Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 517: debated on Tuesday 7 July 1953

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Tuesday, 7th July, 1953

British Army (No 1 Dress)

2.

asked the Secretary of State for War if he will permit the blue walking-out uniforms worn by lance-corporals and privates in the Coronation procession to be retained by them; and what other plans he has for their use in future.

I regret that I cannot agree to this. No. 1 Dress is being provided for the Regular Army rank by rank and this year we are using these uniforms to make a start on issues to corporals.

Trade And Commerce

New Factories, Peterlee (Applications)

13.

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether he is now in a position to make a statement on the provision of new industries in the new town of Peterlee.

Two applications for Government-financed factories in Peterlee are at present under consideration.

Commonwealth Tobacco Imports

asked the President of the Board of Trade what steps he will take to promote the import of tobacco from British Commonwealth territories, in order to restrict dollar expenditure on tobacco.

The import of dollar tobacco is severely restricted on account of our balance of payments. This is a strong inducement to manufacturers to increase their use of tobacco from Commonwealth countries in the sterling area. United Kingdom manufacturers have bought increasing quantities of tobacco from the sterling area and my right hon. Friend expects this trend to continue.

National Finance

Canada (Payments To United Kingdom)

25.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer the separate totals of Treasury receipts of Canadian dollars arising out of export sales and Canadian investment income for each annual accounting period since the end of the war.

It is not the practice to publish details of United Kingdom estimates of the balance of payments with single countries. The yearly figures published by the Dominion Bureau of Statistics as to Canadian payments to the United Kingdom on account of imports and interest and dividends are, however, as follows:

CANADIAN* PAYMENTS TO THE U.K.
(Can. $ millions)
Imports f.o.b.Interest and dividends
194613854
194718253
194828750
194930055
195039955
195141757
195235056
* Including Newfoundland from 1949.

Japan (Uk Capital Transfer)

29.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what transfers he has authorised of capital from this country for the purpose of investment in industry in Japan within the past year.

Only one transfer is recorded as having been authorised for investment in Japan within the last 12 months. It is not, however, the practice to give details of individual transactions between firms or persons and Exchange Control.

Auckland Bridge Project (Refused Loan Issue)

30.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will give the reasons why he refused authority for a loan to be floated in this country in connection with the construction of a bridge at Auckland, New Zealand.

I would refer the hon. Member to the reply given by my hon. Friend the Economic Secretary to the hon. Member for Middlesborough. West (Mr. Simon) on 12th March.

Local Government

Local Authorities (Insurance Funds)

48.

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government how many local authorities have obtained by local Acts powers to establish insurance funds; how many of these local authorities have in fact established them; and if he will arrange to supply information as to the financial condition of these funds.

Central records of powers to establish insurance funds do not go back earlier than 1925; but since that date 401 local authorities have obtained these powers. Figures of rural authorities are not available, but at March, 1952, 83 county and urban authorities possessed insurance funds. The figures showing the position of each of these funds at that date are as follows:

LOCAL AUTHORITY INSURANCE FUNDS 1951–52
Balances in hand
On 1st April, 1951On 31st March, 1952
££
County Councils
Cumberland2,6264,255
Essex22,70225,446
London1,167,2141,179,077
Middlesex47,76653,195
County Borough Councils
Barrow-in-Furness18,80218,221
Birkenhead5,7175,782
Birmingham52,70354,574
Blackpool12,64910,123
Bolton35,13332,793
Bournemouth1,7501,750
Bradford250,009251,012
Brighton20,76724,761
Bristol311,847321,795
Burnley8,2387,553
Bury100,237102,129
Darlington28,48827,188
Dewsbury14,31315,967
Dudley2,2853,554
Eastbourne21,96521,470
Gloucester17,33119,164
Great Yarmouth36,15835,967
Halifax95,27894,738
Hastings19,70420,768
Kingston-upon-Hull57,50260,134
Leeds167,718174,315
Leicester199,864203,332
Lincoln22,04623,372
Liverpool395,868406,775
Manchester106,192112,639

Balances in hand
On 1st April, 1951On 31st March, 1952

County Borough Councils—cont

££
Middlesbrough53,64559,310
Newcastle-upon-Tyne39,14244,227
Northampton47,20649,165
Nottingham186,615198,172
Oldham2,2312,205
Plymouth56,24257,729
Portsmouth124,655123,544
Preston63,17363,530
Rotherham16,23018,754
St. Helens2,9813,040
Salford12,87214,168
Sheffield373,275388,421
Southampton79,40983,263
Southend-on-Sea24,89726,862
South Shields2,1872,394
Stockport33,21335,757
Stoke-on-Trent34,69839,347
Wallasey55,12650,780
Warrington9,64011,841
West Bromwich14,12816,853
West Ham105,067110,535
West Hartlepool11,71512,513
Wigan29,49133,117
York18,46520,591
WALES
Cardiff40,51446,364
Swansea53,94555,856

Non-County Boroughs

Accrington23,64223,832
Bacup10,20310,837
Brentford and Chiswick2,905
Chichester681798
Colne6,8857,419
Crewe4,5325,923
Dagenham7,6739,107
Darwen4,0504,093
Eccles12,83113,548
Hendon45,84950,954
High Wycombe5,1136,393
Jarrow4,9625,930
Loughborough3,0103,526
Richmond (Surrey)10,83811,724
Rowley Regis12,31013,424
Scarborough33,23234,331
Stourbridge1,4952,189
Swindon373787
Taunton590794
Weston-super-Mare6,3737,070
Weymouth6,3147,365
Widnes19,58620,569
Winchester11,68613,226
Workington2,4023,285

Urban District Councils

Enfield4,7765,699
Shipley2,583
Wombwell1,0481,388

Rural District Council

Eton1,0001,027

Tees Valley Water Board (Grant Application)

44.

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government whether he has reached a decision on the application of the Tees Valley Water Board for grant under Section 3 of the Distribution of Industry Act. 1945.

Cooling Towers, Cardiff (Nuisance)

49.

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government whether he is aware of the continuing nuisance suffered by the inhabitants of Caerphilly Road, Cardiff, and its neighbourhood, as a result of vibration of machinery and damp produced by cooling towers owned by the British Oxygen Co. Ltd.; that representations made by the local authority have not had the effect of terminating the nuisance which is damaging the property and health of many citizens of Cardiff; and what action he proposes to take.

No, but if my hon. Friend will supply me with particulars I will have inquiries made.

Sewage Schemes

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government how many new sewage schemes, or extensions of existing sewage schemes, have been approved by his Department during the past 12 months; what is the capital expenditure involved; how many such schemes have been submitted, but are still awaiting approval; and what capital expenditure is involved.

Five hundred and seventy-eight schemes were authorised to start during the twelve months ending on 31st May, 1953, at a total capital cost of £173/4 million. I regret that the information asked for in the second part of the Question is not readily available.

Derating

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government if he is aware that from 1930 to March 1953, the county borough of West Ham had a loss of rates, due to derating, of £2,395,602; and how soon he anticipates being able to introduce legislation to remove that burden on war-damaged boroughs.

I cannot accept the figures, and in any event the derating loss was taken into account in the block grant and the equalisation grant. On the second part of the Question, I would refer the hon. Member to the reply given to the hon. Member for Leicester, Northwest (Mr. Janner) on 17th March.

Housing

Derequisitioning (Completion)

46.

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government how many local authorities have indicated that they can comply with the recommendations of the Working Party on Requisitioned Houses and complete their derequisitioning by 10th December, 1953.

All but 27 of the 585 local authorities concerned have given my right hon. Friend an assurance to this effect.

47.

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government whether he will extend by six months the terminal date for the derequisitioning of houses in the case of the borough of Stockton-on-Tees.

No, for the reasons which my right hon. Friend has already explained to the hon. Member.

Softwood

51.

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government if he will give an estimate of the saving in the cost of house building which could be made if softwood were made freely available for all purposes.

At present prices of softwood it is estimated there would be no saving.

Prospective Tenants (Financial Conditions)

52.

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government if he is aware of the practice of some landlords and house agents to require from prospective tenants advance deposits of rent, payments for furniture and other financial conditions; if he will make an investigation into these practices; and what action he proposes to take to deal with this matter.

To demand a premium or an excessive payment for furniture is already illegal under Section 3 of the Landlord and Tenant (Rent Control) Act, 1949, and my right hon. Friend has not received many representations on this point. Last year he received a number of representations about demands of rent in advance for long periods. He made inquiries and found that most of the cases came from bogus letting agencies. The activities of these bodies have been greatly curtailed by the prosecutions the police undertook, and will be still further restricted by the Accommodation Agencies Act. It is to be hoped that this particular abuse will come to an end with them.If the hon. Gentleman will send me details of the cases he has in mind, I will look into them.

Mortgages (Local Authority Guarantees)

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government if he will make a further statement on the total number of houses in respect of which local authorities have since 1919 given guarantees to building societies to cover part of the advance, and the total charge that has fallen on the Exchequer in consequence.

On the latest information available, local authorities have guaranteed advances on 31,635 houses. In addition they have given joint guarantees with the Treasury on advances for 21,482 houses. The loss to the Exchequer from the joint guarantees is £1,902.

Brick Output

59.

asked the Minister of Works if he is aware of the continuing shortage of bricks in many parts of the country; and what further action he is taking to expand production.

I am aware that the expansion in building all over the country calls for increased supplies of building materials. The output of bricks this year is substantially above last, and nearly 20 per cent. more than in 1951. There are signs that the rising output has not yet reached its peak.

Employment

Transferred Workers (Lodging Allowances)

60.

asked the Minister of Labour what changes have recently taken place in regard to subsistence allowances to transferred workers.

The only recent change is that lodging allowances under the general scheme for transferred workers who have home commitments are now granted only to those placed by my Department in vacancies of exceptional urgency and importance and not, as previously, to those transferred to first preference vacancies in general. Those who were receiving lodging allowances before the change made on 11th May are not affected.

Travel Vouchers

asked the Minister of Labour if he will arrange for travel vouchers to be issued to those registering for work who are sent considerable distances to be interviewed by prospective employers.

A travel voucher for an interview with a prospective employer may be issued in certain circumstances to disabled persons and generally if the employer has given a written undertaking to repay the fare or has deposited the amount of the fare with the Department's local office.

Night Baking

asked the Minister of Labour when he proposes to introduce legislation to give effect to the recommendations contained in the Report of the Committee on Night Baking, Command Paper No. 8378.

I would refer the hon. and learned Member to the reply my right hon. and learned Friend gave to the hon. Members for Sunderland, North (Mr. Willey) and Islington, South-West (Mr. A. Evans) on 23rd June, 1953.

Prescot

asked the Minister of Labour the numbers registering as unemployed at the Prescot local office of his Department for October, 1951, October, 1952 and each month of 1953.

The following table gives the information desired:

NUMBERS OF PERSONS REGISTERED AS UNEMPLOYED AT PRESCOT EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE AND YOUTH EMPLOYMENT OFFICE AT THE UNDERMENTIONED DATES.
DateMalesFemalesTotal
15th October, 1951170179349
13th October, 1952422326748
12th January, 19535844431,027
16th February, 1953522440962
16th March, 19535254771,002
13th April, 19535504651,015
11th May, 1953420440860
15th June, 1953384389773

Scotland

Rural Electrification Expenditure

63.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will consult the British Electricity Authority to ascertain what proportion of the additional capital approved for rural electrification will be devoted to South-East Scotland; and if he will, after consultation, make a statement in regard to increased supplies for that area.

I would refer my hon. and gallant Friend to the reply given on 1st July to my hon. and gallant Friend the Member for Berwick and East Lothian (Major Anstruther-Gray).

Hydro-Electric Board

64.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether he will state the aggregate installed capacity, M.W.I., of all hydro-electric works owned by the North of Scotland Hydro-Electric Board at 1st July, 1953, or latest convenient date; the capital expenditure incurred by the Board to that date; the capital vested in the Board at 1st July, 1953; and what part of it, and the amount, is represented by sums advanced, or otherwise invested, by the National Debt Commissioners.

I am informed by the Board that the total installed capacity at 1st July, 1953, of all hydro-electric works owned by them was 397 megawatts. The capital expenditure incurred at that date including expenditure on assets transferred to the Board on nationalisation, expenditure on distribution and expenditure on works not yet in operation was approximately £88·5 million; and the Board's issued capital was £82 million, of which £57 million of stock was issued to the National Debt Commissioners and £25 million of stock was a public issue. In addition, approximately £8·5 million of compensation stock was issued to the public by the British Electricity Authority in respect of assets vested in the Board, who will be issuing stock of the same value to the authority in due course.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the average load factor of all water-power establishments, excluding thermal and diesel power stations, owned by the North of Scotland Hydro-Electric Board, and measured as an average over the first six months of 1953, or nearest comparable period; and what special efforts he is making to raise the relatively low load-factor of such new establishments as those in the Moriston and Breadalbane schemes.

As I indicated in reply to my hon. Friend's Question on 17th February last, the average load factor in 1952 of all hydro-electric works owned by the Board was 27·7 per cent., including Sloy—which was designed as a peak load station—or 36·4 per cent., excluding Sloy. I am informed that the figures for the first six months of this year are approximately the same. The load factor of the demand in the Board's area in 1952 was about 38 per cent., and, as the load factors of the Moriston and Breadalbane Schemes will be about 43½ per cent. and 40 per cent. respectively, I cannot agree that they are relatively low.

Crofters, Armadale (Water Supply)

65.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland why he has rejected Sutherland County Council's scheme to bring water to the crofters in Armadale who are Government tenants, none of whom have piped water and all of whom are dependent on a defective and contaminated supply.

The scheme was not approved for grant because of the disproportionate cost. I have no information about the quality of the present supply and have called for a report on this matter from the county council.

School Places (Completions)

66.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many secondary school places and primary school places, respectively, were completed in 1951 and 1952.

7,790 secondary and 11,435 primary places were completed in 1951. 4,972 secondary and 10,780 primary places were completed in 1952.

House Building Programme

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many two, three, four and five-apartment houses, respectively were built by local authorities from October, 1952, to March, 1953.

Of 13,268 local authority houses approved during the period in question, 765, or 5·8 per cent., were of one and two apartments: 6,498, or 49 per cent. were of three apartments; 5,581, or 42 per cent., were of four apartments; and 424, or 3·2 per cent., were of five or more apartments.

Civil Aviation (Public Relations Staff)

67.

asked the Minister of Civil Aviation how many people in his Department are now engaged on public information and Press relation duties.

Five, and these are assisted by three members of the clerical and secretarial staff.

Shipbuilding

68.

asked the Minister of Transport if his attention has been called to the cancellation of contracts for shipbuilding; if he is aware that this is due to rising costs and that British shipowners cannot compete successfully in the world's freight markets because of the many restrictions and heavy taxation imposed by Government control; what action he proposes to take; and if he will make a statement.

I know that certain shipowners have pointed to the high cost of new tonnage as a reason for the cancellation of shipbuilding contracts.The only important Government restrictions on British shipping are on the transfer of ships from the British register and on the carriage of strategic materials to China and North Korea, which are both essential in present world conditions. I have no evidence that either these controls or the weight of taxation are preventing British ships from competing successfully in the world's freight market. As regards shipbuilding costs I would refer my hon. Friend to what was said on the Adjournment on 26th June by my hon. Friend the Civil Lord of the Admiralty.

Embakasi Airport, Kenya (Labour)

asked the Secretary of State for the Colonies what type of labour is to be employed in the construction of the airport at Embakasi in Kenya.

As work must be found for convicts, whose number has almost doubled in the last year, the construction of this airport has been advanced by the Kenya Government and for a time a proportion of the labour employed on it will consist of convicts. The remainder will be ordinary labour at current wage rates.

Colonial Empire (Sugar Derationing)

asked the Secretary of State for the Colonies which of the Colonies have been able to deration sugar since the end of the war; and which still maintain the rationing of this commodity.

pursuant to his written reply [OFFICIAL REPORT, 14th April, 1953; Vol. 514, c. 7], supplied the following information:Sugar has been derationed since the end of the war in the following territories with which I am concerned:Bahamas, Bermuda, Brunei, Falkland Islands, Gambia, Kenya, Federation of Malaya, North Borneo, Northern Rhodesia, Sarawak, Seychelles, Tanganyika. It is still rationed in Cyprus, Gibraltar, Hong Kong, Malta, St. Helena, Singapore and Zanzibar.It is still rationed in Cyprus Gibraltar, Hong, Malta, St. Helena, Singapore and Zanzibar.

Nazi Victims (Compensation)

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what report he has now had from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees regarding the Federal German Government's Bill to give compensation to victims in Germany of Nazi persecution; and whether he is now satisfied that there is no discrimination in this Bill between Germans and non-Germans.

On 25th June the United Nations High Commission for Refugees sent a report to the Allied High Commission drawing their attention to the fact that the Federal German Government's Bill to give compensation to victims of Nazi persecution does not, in its present form, cover all victims of concentration camps. This Bill is however intended to satisfy the obligations assumed by the German Federal Republic under the Bonn Conventions and it appears to fulfil this requirement. However,

YearExpenditure of Local Education AuthoritiesPercentage of Local Education Authority Expenditure (Col. 2)Percentage of local rates spent on EducationNet estimates of Education Departments (England and Wales and Scotland) as percentage of ordinary expenditure (United Kingdom)
met from ratesmet from Government grant
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
£'000Per cent.Per cent.Per cent.Per cent.
1949–50 (revised)237,39239·061·032·96·3
1950–51247,41239·460·633·46·7
1951–52291,94839·360·736·35·6
1952–53 (estimated)323,53538·461·637·15·6
Comparable figures to those given in column (6) above for the years: 1900–01, 1910–11, 1920–21, 1930–31, 1937–38 are 5·9, 9·5, 4·4, 6·6 and 6·8.

the matter raised by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees is under urgent consideration and I would refer my hon. and gallant Friend to the reply given yesterday to my hon. and gallant Friend the Member for Merton and Morden (Captain Ryder).

Education (Public Expenditure Statistics)

asked the Minister of Education to give the figures that will bring up to date the statistics of public expenditure on education provided in Table 100 of Command Paper 8244, 1951.

The figures are as follows, including revised figures for 1949–50 based on actual, instead of estimated, expenditure, and with the figures in the last column adjusted to compare the net expenditure of the two education Departments (England and Wales and Scotland) with the total of Exchequer ordinary expenditure (United Kingdom):