Written Answers To Questions
Friday, 12th April, 1957
Ministry Of Health
National Health Service (General Practitioners)
asked the Minister of Health how many general practitioners employed in the National Health Service have lists of between 3,000 and 3,500, how many between 1,000 and 2,000 and how many under 1,000.
I regret that information is not available precisely in the form requested but the following figures may be helpful. On 1st July, 1956, the number of general practitioners in England and Wales with lists of between 2,500 and 3,500 patients was 5,385; the number with lists of between 1,500 and 2,500 was 5,218; and the number with lists of 1,500 or under was 5,500, of whom about 540 had lists of 500 or under.
Agriculture
Rabbits
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he is aware that the rabbit pest is again becoming serious in various parts of Kent; and if he will make suggestions as to how this pest can now be eradicated.
My right hon. Friend is aware that there has been some increase in the number of rabbits in Kent, particularly in woodlands on the North Downs. Kent has been designated a rabbit clearance area under the Pests Act and it is the responsibility of occupiers to destroy rabbits on their land. My right hon. Friend would again stress the importance of taking action before it is too late. The Agricultural Executive Committee and the pests officers in Kent will continue to provide advice and, where appropriate, to take enforcement action.
Employment
Earnings And Productivity
asked the Minister of Labour if he will publish in the OFFICIAL REPORT a table showing the average weekly earnings of adult male workers in manufacturing industries in October, 1945, and in October of each subsequent year, beside columns showing the rise in weekly earnings based on 100 in October, 1945, and similar figures for productivity.
The following table gives the figures in respect of average weekly earnings.
| Date | Average weekly earnings of adult male workers in manufacturing industries | |||
| s. | d. | Index | ||
| July, 1945* | … | 126 | 7 | 100 |
| October, 1946 | … | 126 | 7 | 100 |
| October, 1947 | … | 134 | 5 | 106 |
| October, 1948 | … | 143 | 4 | 113 |
| October, 1949 | … | 148 | 1 | 117 |
| October, 1950 | … | 156 | 8 | 124 |
| October, 1951 | … | 172 | 1 | 136 |
| October, 1952 | … | 184 | 9 | 146 |
| October, 1953 | … | 196 | 7 | 155 |
| October, 1954 | … | 212 | 3 | 168 |
| October, 1955 | … | 231 | 1 | 183 |
| October, 1956 | … | 245 | 7 | 194 |
| * Figures of average weekly earnings in October, 1945, are not available. | ||||
| 1948 = 100 | |||||
| 1946 | … | 95 | 1952 | … | 109 |
| 1947 | … | 94 | 1953 | … | 115 |
| 1949 | … | 105 | 1954 | … | 121 |
| 1950 | … | 111 | 1955 | … | 125 |
| 1951 | … | 113 | 1956 | … | 123 |
European Common Market (Overseas Territories)
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs on what date Her Majesty's Government were first informed of the French proposal to include French, Belgian, and Dutch overseas territories in the plan for a common market.
The question of the relationship to the Common Market of those overseas territories which have constitutional or economic links with the metropolitan Powers involved was first raised by the French Delegation at the Venice Conference of the six Messina Powers which met on 30th-31st May, 1956, to discuss future action on the Report of the Brussels Inter-governmental Committee (the Spaak Report). No proposals were put forward and the whole question was referred to experts for further study.
Towards the end of November, Her Majesty's Government became aware that Franco-Belgian proposals on the association of overseas territories with the proposed Messina Customs Union had just been submitted for consideration to the four other member countries, although it was not known whether these proposals or any others would be acceptable to the other member countries. Indeed, until the Press communiqué issued on 20th February following the meeting of the Prime Ministers of the six Messina Powers, Her Majesty's Government had no reason to believe that any detailed provisions for the association of overseas territories would be included in the Customs Union Treaty.