Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 659: debated on Friday 18 May 1962

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Friday, 18th May, 1962

Tanganyika

Financial Aid

asked the Secretary of State for Commonwealth Relations whether, as a result of recent discussions between the British Government and the Government of Tanganyika, any modification has been made to the financial settlement with Tanganyika announced by the Secretary of State for the Colonies on 4th August, 1961.

Yes. In order to alleviate financial difficulties arising from delays in the receipt of funds from other sources, and from unforeseen expenditure consequent on floods and famines, the British Government have agreed that the Tanganyika Government may now draw on that part of the special gift of £4 million towards the Development Plan (amounting to £1⅓ million) which, under the terms of the statement to which my hon. Friend refers, would have been drawn between 1st July, 1963, and 30th June, 1964. The Tanganyika Government for their part have undertaken to spend equivalent sums on the purchase of British goods and services.£⅓ million will be made available for payments after 1st May, 1962, for British goods bought in Tanganyika, and £1 million will be paid to the Crown Agents by monthly instalments between May and October this year for the account of the Tanganyika Government, against that Government's undertaking to place through the Crown Agents new contracts for British goods and services to the value of £1 million by 31st October, 1962.Parliament will be asked to vote the necessary funds by a summer Supplementary Estimate. In the meantime the necessary advances will be obtained from the Civil Contingencies Fund.

Ministry Of Health

Vaccination (Fees)

asked the Minister of Health what action he proposes to take to reimburse general practitioners in cases where they have given vaccinations on the understanding that a payment of 5s. per vaccination would be made for all categories of patient, only to find that no payment or payments for restricted categories will be made.

asked the Minister of Health what recent change has been made in the position whereby local health authorities pays a fee of 5s. to a general practitioner in respect of each vaccination notified; and if he will make a statement.

There has been no change. Subject to any general requirements, each local health authority decides the categories of vaccination for which it asks general practitioners to supply individual records. A fee of 5s. is payable by the authority for each such record.

asked the Minister of Health whether the sums deducted from the general practitioners' central pool in respect of fees received from local health authorities are refunded to those authorities making the original payments.

Education

Business Studies (Certificates And Diplomas)

asked the Minister of Education how many National Certificates in Commerce, ordinary and higher, respectively, were awarded in each of the years 1958 to 1961.

The numbers of Ordinary and Higher National Certificates in Commerce awarded in each of the years 1958 to 1961 are as follows:

DateOrdinary National CertificateHigher National Certificate
19583807
19595498
196062822
196188752

Note. The Ordinary National Certificate in Commerce will no longer be awarded after the end of the current session, and the Higher National Certificate in Commerce after the end of the session 1962–63. They are being replaced by the Ordinary National Certificate and Higher National Certificate in Business Studies.

asked the Minister of Education how many schemes have been approved for ordinary and higher national certificates in business studies, and ordinary national diplomas in business studies and how many students are following courses for each of these qualifications at present.

CourseSchemes ApprovedSchemes under considerationTotal applications for approvalNumber of students in November, 1961
Ordinary National Certificate258733318,699
Ordinary National Diploma95381331,011
Higher National Certificate94411351,450
Notes:
1. The number of established courses does not necessarily correspond to the number of schemes approved. Some of those under consideration are already in operation.
2. Some students at present following a Higher National Certificate course in Commerce may choose to transfer to the final year of a Higher National Certificate course in Business Studies in the session 1962–63. The number of such students is not yet known.
3. The Ordinary National Certificate Schemes in Commerce will cease to exist at the end of the current session, and the Higher National Certificate Schemes in Commerce and the Intermediate Certificate Schemes in Management Studies will cease to exist at the end of the session 1962–63. They are being replaced by Schemes for the Ordinary National Certificate and Higher National Certificate in Business Studies.
4. Twenty-five schemes relating to the Higher National Diploma in Business Studies are under consideration. None has yet been approved.
5. The figures given in the Answer for students enrolled in these courses have only recently become available. They confirm what was already evident from information about the number of schemes submitted, namely that the new courses have proved highly successful and mark a major advance.
6. Comparison with the figures given in the Answer to the previous Question gives some indication of the progress achieved. In 1960 and 1961, the last two years of the old Ordinary National Certificate course, somewhat over 1,500 Certificates were awarded; the numbers on the course were between 5,000 and 6,000 over the two years: but only about half of these entered for the Ordinary National Certificate examinations.
7. The Ordinary National Diploma is an entirely new award, and the figures show a gratifying amount of support for it.
8. The figures for the new Higher National Certificate courses are particularly striking, when compared with those shown in the Answer to the previous Question, for the years 1960 and 1961.

Hospitals

Hollymoor And Rubery Hospitals, Birmingham

asked the Minister of Health if he is aware that, since the hearing of the tribunal recently considering the affair of the Hollymoor and Rubery Hospital Group, attempts have been made to interfere with the chairman in the performance of his duties; and what action he proposes to take in the matter.

This is a matter for the Hospital Management Committee in the first instance.

The numbers of schemes approved and under consideration for ordinary and higher national certificates and ordinary national diplomas in business studies, together with the numbers of students following established courses in the current academic year, are set out in the following table:

Local Government

Greater London (Boundaries)

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government and Minister for Welsh Affairs what has been the result of his consideration of the representations made by local authorities who wish their areas to be excluded from his Greater London proposals.

I have already announced that the urban districts of Banstead, Caterham and Warlingham, and Walton and Weybridge should be regarded as falling outside Greater London.

I have now had discussions with representatives of all the other authorities who had asked for the exclusion of areas. I have given the most careful thought to what they have said:

My conclusions are as follows:
The urban districts of Cheshunt, Chigwell (with some boundary adjustment), Esher, Staines and Sunbury-on-Thames should be regarded as outside Greater London.
I have concluded, however, that the borough of Romford and the urban districts of Barnet, Carshalton, Coulsdon and Purley, Feltham, and Yiewsley and West Drayton must be treated as part of Greater London.
Requests were made by the county councils concerned for the exclusion from Greater London of the borough of Surbiton and the urban district of Hornchurch. I have concluded that both these areas should be included—as the borough council and the urban district council themselves desire.
The northern part of the borough of Epsom and Ewell definitely forms, in my view, part of Greater London and must be included Other parts of the borough, including the town of Epsom, can properly be excluded.
All the local authorities concerned have been informed of these conclusions. Provision to give effect to them will be laid before Parliament in the legislation for London government.

Employment

National Coal Board Workshops, Cowdenbeath

asked the Minister of Labour what information he has received from the National Coal Board regarding the future employment requirements of their central workshops at Cowdenbeath.

I understand that the National Coal Board is examining the future employment requirements of these workshops.

Trade And Commerce

Fife

asked the President of the Board of Trade how many applications from Fife for financial assistance under the Local Employment Act, 1960, have been made; how many have been accepted; and how many have been refused.

Applications have been received for financial assistance for seven projects in Fife. Assistance has been offered in two cases, three have been rejected and the other two are under consideration.

Cowdenbeath

asked the President of the Board of Trade how many jobs are likely to be available in the Cowden-heath area in the next six months.

Out of the 1,200 jobs now in prospect from new building and other developments in the Dunfermline group of Employment Exchange areas, which includes Cowdenbeath, it is expected that some 450 to 500 may arise within the next six to twelve months.

Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

Fishing Vessels And Engines (Grants)

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what proposals he has to deal with the present requirement that grant assistance for fishing vessels and engines can be given only for vessels or engines built in the United Kingdom.

It has been decided that having regard to the interests of the fishermen, for whom this assistance is provided, and to our international obligations, this requirement should be removed. It is intended that this decision will be put into effect in the schemes for grant assistance for the purchase of vessels and engines, which will be presented to Parliament under the Sea Fish Industry Bill when it has received the Royal Assent. A similar change will be made in the arrangements governing the provision of loan assistance for these purposes by the White Fish Authority and the Herring Industry Board.Any applicants for grants and loans who propose to have vessels built abroad will be required to provide evidence that British yards have been given an equal chance to compete.