Written Answers To Questions
Friday, 29th June, 1962
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Old Orchards, East Sussex
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what acreage of old orchard in East Sussex has been grubbed up with the assistance of a grant during each of the last two years; and what were the costs in each case.
The only information available relates to grants made under the Horticulture Improvement Scheme. This is that during 1960–61 4½ acres of orchard were grubbed up in East Sussex at a total cost of £158 on which grant amounted to £53, and in 1961–62 applications involving the grubbing up of 10 acres were approved at a total estimated cost of £411 on which grant would be £137.
Laos (Release Of British Prisoners)
asked the Lord Privy Seal whether he will make a statement concerning the four British subjects who have been reported prisoners of the Pathet Lao and the possibility of securing their release.
I am glad to say that all four prisoners have now been released and have arrived in Vientiane. Her Majesty's Ambassador has reported that they have been well treated and are all in good health.
Vietnam (Control Commission)
asked the Lord Privy Seal if he will publish as a White Paper or in the OFFICIAL REPORT the text of the two British notes to the Soviet Government concerning the recently published Special Report of the International Commission for Supervision and Control in Vietnam.
Yes. The texts are as follows:
Note to the Soviet Government on the International Control Commission's Special Report on Vietnam (delivered in Moscow on 23rd June).
Her Britannic Majesty's Embassy present their compliments to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the U.S.S.R. and have the honour to refer to the Embassy's Note No. 407 of the 14th of June in which it was proposed that the Special Report from the Chairman of the International Commission for Supervision and Control in Viet Nam to the Joint co-Chairman of the Geneva Conference should be published in Moscow and London on the 21st of June. Since the Soviet Government had not yet replied to this Note publication did not take place on the date proposed.
Her Britannic Majesty's Embassy understand that the Soviet Government will eventually be sending a reply, covering both the question of publication and the Soviet Government's comments on the substance of the report. Her Majesty's Government await with interest the comments of the Soviet Government but would prefer that publication should not be delayed further.
It is now over two weeks since the report was handed over in New Delhi and various incomplete accounts of it have already appeared in the Press throughout the world. In order to remove any possibility of misapprehension as to the contents of the report Her Majesty's Government consider that a complete text should be published as soon as possible and they therefore intend to release the text of the report in London at 11.00 hours, G.M.T., on Monday, 25th June, together with their Note of 14th June.
Note to the Soviet Government on the International Control Commission's Special Report on Vietnam (delivered in Moscow on 14th June)
Her Britannic Majesty's Embassy present their compliments to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the U.S.S.R. and have the honour to draw their attention to the Special Report addressed to the Co-Chairmen of the Geneva Conference of 1954 by the Chairman of the International Commission for Supervision and Control in Vietnam dated 2nd June.
Her Majesty's Government endorse the conclusions of the Commission's report and wish to draw the attention of the Soviet Union to certain important aspects of it. The Commission have decided that there is sufficient evidence to show beyond reasonable doubt that the People's Army of Vietnam (i.e., the North Vietnamese) has violated Articles 10, 19, 24 and 27 of the Cease Fire Agreements in specific instances. The Report shows that the North Vietnamese have sent armed and unarmed personnel, arms, munitions and other supplies into South Vietnam with the object of supporting, organising and carrying out hostile activities, including armed attacks directed against the armed forces and administration of the Government of the Republic of Vietnam. Furthermore the North Vietnamese have permitted the zone in the North (i.e., North Vietnam) to be used for encouraging and supporting hostile activities in the South aimed at the overthrow of the administration in the South (i.e., the Republic of Vietnam) in violation of Articles 19, 24 and 27 of the Cease Fire Agreement.
While the report also refers to the violations of the Geneva Agreement by the Republic of Vietnam in receiving increased military aid from the United States it produces no evidence of any violation of the territory of North Vietnam by the Government of the South.
Her Majesty's Government draw special attention to the dates quoted in the report relating to the illegal activities of the North Vietnamese authorities and to the intensification of United States assistance. It is evident that the complaints of Northern subversion are of long standing. Reference to them was made as early as the 10th Interim Report which deals with the period beginning 1st February, 1959, whereas the intensification in United States assistance did not begin until December, 1961—in other words long after the threat from North Vietnam had developed and after the Government of Vietnam had felt obliged, in face of the extensive plan of subversion and terrorism deliberately embarked upon by the Hanoi authorities, to request the Government of the United States to furnish assistance of a military nature to meet this threat.
The Report thus confirms the view expressed in Her Majesty's Government's Note of 3rd November, 1961, and their Aides Méntoires of 16th February and 19th April, 1962, that the activities of the North Vietnamese authorities were the root cause of the present troubles.
Her Majesty's Government, as Co-Chairman of the Geneva Conference, have twice requested the Government of the Soviet Union to join with them in appealing to the North Vietnamese to call a halt to their campaign in the South. The Soviet Union have, however, ignored these requests, which can now be shown to have been based upon a true interpretation of the situation. Moreover, the North Vietnamese authorities have, despite the overwhelming evidence, consistently denied responsibility for their activities in South Vietnam; these denials can now be seen in their true light. In contrast, the Government of the Republic of Vietnam have never sought to conceal the fact that they were obliged to call upon the United States Government for assistance to improve their defences to meet the threat from the North. In an exchange of letters, which was published on 15th December, 1961, between the President of the Republic of Vietnam and the President of the United States, the defensive nature of this assistance and the reasons for it were clearly described. It is particularly significant that, in his letter President Kennedy stated expressly that if the Communist authorities in North Vietnam would stop their campaign to destroy the Republic of Vietnam, the measures the United States were taking to assist the South Vietnamese defence efforts would no longer be necessary. In a communication to the Commission dated 9th December, 1961, the South Vietnamese Government stated inter alia, "These measures can end as soon as the North Vietnam authorities will have ceased their acts of aggression and will have begun to respect the Geneva Agreement". Furthermore, in a statement on 1st March, 1962, the American Secretary of State. Mr. Rusk, added that the United States have no desire for bases or other United States military advantages in Vietnam.
In the light of these assurances and of the findings of the Commission, Her Majesty's Government consider that the conclusion to be drawn is that urgent measures should be taken to ensure that the North Vietnamese authorities return to the observance of the Cease Fire Agreement. Her Majesty's Government invite the Soviet Co-Chairman to consider the desirability of addressing a joint message from the Co-Chairmen to the Chairman of the Commission recommending that the immediate task of the Commission should be to ensure that further violations of the Cease Fire Agreement are not committed by the North Vietnamese authorities. To this end it is suggested that the Commission should be invited to consider methods of dealing expeditiously with complaints by the Republic of Vietnam about current subversive activities, and, in order to put a stop to further infiltration of personnel, arms and equipment, that the Commission should be invited to consider the stationing of mobile teams on the borders of Vietnam. It is also proposed that the Co-Chairmen should invite both sides to return to a policy of co-operation with the Commission.
Her Majesty's Government propose to circulate copies of the Commission's Special Report to the Governments of the Republic of Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, France and the United States and that the report should be published in London and Moscow on 21st June.
Hospitals
Committee Of Inquiry
asked the Minister of Health if he will give the names and designations of the persons serving on the Committee of Inquiry into the administrative and clerical staffing arrangements of the hospital service; how many meetings have been held; when the report is expected; and if he will make a statement.
The membership of the Committee was announced on 26th January. I am sending the hon. Member a copy of the announcement. Three meetings have been held. The Committee is still receiving written evidence, and has begun taking oral evidence. It is too early to say when a report can be expected.
Rubery Hill Hospital (Inquiry)
asked the Minister of Health whether he proposes to publish the Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the differences between the Chairman of the Birmingham No. 6 Group Hospital Management Committee and the Group Medical Committee; what are the inquiry committee's recommendations; and what action he proposes to take on them.
Yes, the Report and a Supplementary Report as to the allegation concerning a motion of censure on a certain doctor are being made available to the Press today and two copies will be placed in the Library of the House. The Committee found no ground for criticism of the Chairman's personal integrity and paid a tribute to his hard work and enthusiasm, but concluded that the work of the hospitals would be prejudiced if he continued as Chairman. The principal conclusions and recommendations of the Reports are that the Chairman of the Hospital Management Committee should be changed, that the recognised constitutional procedures should henceforth be followed by Chairman, Committee and officers, that the membership of the Committee should be strengthened, that consideration should be given to the re-grouping of the hospitals, that the Group Medical Committee should revert to its proper function, that the Regional Hospital Board should establish and maintain close supervision of the administration of this Group, and, as regards the motion of censure, that the action of the Medical Superintendent at Rubery Hill Hospital was wholly unjustified.I accept these conclusions. The recommendations are being brought to the attention of all concerned in acting upon them. I have invited the Regional Hospital Board to submit to me urgently proposals for re-grouping the hospitals.
Nyasaland
Housing
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (Central African Office) how many African homes have now been provided in Nyasaland by the Colonial Development Corporation; and what plans there are for the expansion of this programme.
1,328 houses have so far been built from the Colonial Development Corporation loan of £1 million and about 250 more will be built during 1962–63. This will exhaust the loan. Plans for further housing now under consideration are dependent upon the availability of additional finance.
Home Department
Commonwealth Immigrants
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the number of Commonwealth immigrants for the period 1st January to 31st May 1962; from which countries they principally came; and how these figures compare for each country with those of the corresponding period in 1961.
The following is the information requested:
| Estimated net inward movement from: | 1st January— 31st May | ||
| 1961 | 1962 | ||
| West Indies | … | 26,000 | 23,500 |
| East African territories | … | 650 | 1,100 |
| West African territories | … | 900 | 4,350 |
| Cyprus | … | 1,800 | 900 |
| Gibraltar | … | - 150 | - 180 |
| Malta | … | 230 | 500 |
| Aden | … | 70 | - 30 |
| Hong Kong | … | 650 | 1,560 |
| Malaya | … | Nil | 450 |
| Singapore | … | 280 | 430 |
| India | … | 6,700 | 13,650 |
| Pakistan | … | 6,000 | 19,050 |
| Ceylon | … | 120 | 720 |
| Miscellaneous territories | … | 200 | 1,500 |
| 43,450 | 67,500 | ||
| Notes: | |||
| 1. A minus sign denotes a net outward movement. | |||
| 2. Figures are not available in respect of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland. | |||
Telephone Service
Waiting List (Business Subscribers)
asked the Postmaster-General how many applications from potential business subscribers were placed on the telephone waiting list during 1961; how many potential business subscribers were on the waiting list as at 1st June, 1962; and what percentage of these have been waiting for under three months, under six months, under 12 months, under two years, and two years or more respectively.
Regular records giving this information are not maintained; I do not think that a special inquiry to obtain it would be justified, especially as the composition of the waiting list is constantly changing and business applications are given priority.
Capital Expenditure
asked the Postmaster-General what is the target for the rate of growth in the number of telephones for the next five years.
My present plans for capital exenditure include provision for an average rate of growth in the number of telephones of 5 per cent, per annum over the next five years.
asked the Postmaster-General what is the estimated capital expenditure on trunk and junction circuits, local lines, subscriber's circuits, exchange equipment, inland telegraph equipment and overseas services, respectively, in the years 1962–63, 1963–64, 1964–65 and 1965–66, respectively.
My present plans for capital expenditure include the following:
| —— | 1962–1963 | 1963–1964 | 1964–1965 | 1965–1966 |
| £m. | £m. | £m. | £m. | |
| Trunk and junction circuits | 20 | 23 | 25 | 25 |
| Local lines | 24 | 29 | 34 | 36 |
| Subscribers' circuits | 28 | 31 | 36 | 39 |
| Exchange equipment | 24 | 28 | 32 | 34 |
| Inland telegraph equipment | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Overseas services | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| The figures for 1964–65 and 1965–66 form part of public investment programmes which have still to be approved by the Government. | ||||
Telex Service
asked the Postmaster-General what steps he is taking to bring the advantages of the Telex service to the notice of manufacturers and merchants engaged in exporting.
Every appropriate medium of publicity, including press advertisements, demonstrations and direct mail, is used to emphasise the advantages of the Telex service.
Scotland
Council For Research In Education
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will state the amount of the grant to the Scottish Council for Research in Education; by what percentage this has been increased over the most recent convenient period; and if he will give details of the additional programme of practical research at present being planned.
In the current financial year the Exchequer grant to the Council is expected to be about £5,000, an increase of two-thirds over last year's figure of £3,000. New projects which the Council has recently decided to undertake cover studies in the teaching of mathematics and of teaching by television. Additional subjects for investigation which my Department has proposed to the Council include the age of transfer of pupils from primary to secondary education and the use of attainment tests; the optimum size of class and of school; and the validity of examinations other than the traditional external written examination and the comparability of examinations in various subjects.
British Army
Baor Personnel (German Language)
asked the Secretary of State for War how many commanding officers in British forces in Germany have given instructions in writing to their officers to learn the German language, and after a period to take an examination on the subject; and when such orders were given.
So far as I am aware no such instructions have been given; but officers in Germany are given every encouragement and facility to learn German; and cash awards are made to all ranks who pass an examination at colloquial standard.