Written Answers To Questions
Friday, 11th December, 1964
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Anglo-Soviet Agreement (Exchange Of Information)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what agreement has been reached with the Soviet Government on the exchange of information on agricultural scientific research; and whether he will make a statement.
I am afraid that I cannot yet add to the reply I gave the right hon. Member on 18th November.
Milk
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what variation existed between the price of Channel Islands milk and other milk in 1954; and what variation now exists.
In 1954, the maximum price of Channel Islands milk—other than farm-bottled—was 1d. per pint higher than ordinary pasteurised milk; today it is 1½d. per pint higher.
Channel Islands (Milk)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, whether he will now decontrol the price of Channel Islands milk, and allow it to find its own level in the market.
No
Farne Islands Seals
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the cost of the recent cull of seals on the Farne Islands; to whom the payments were made; and what are the future plans of his Department in regard to the seals on the Fame Islands.
Final figures are not available but the estimated net cost, excluding salaries and travelling expenses of the Ministry officials, after taking into account the payments due from the firm which collected the carcases, is of the order of £1,200.The payments will be made to the B.E.A. for the hire of a helicopter and to a local boatman.
With regard to the last part of the Question I have nothing to add to my reply of 26th November to the hon. Member for Newcastle-upon-Tyne, West (Mr. Popplewell).
Sheep Dips
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheres and Food what alternative preparation of equal effectiveness can be used by sheep farmers in place of the dieldrin preparation; and what is its cost and availability.
Several formulations to replace dieldrin in sheep dips are in various stages of trial and one is due to be marketed very soon. I have no information as to the price at which any of these formulations may be marketed.
Swine Fever
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many outbreaks of swine fever there have been, month by month, since January, 1964, up to the latest convenient date; and what has been the cost of the slaughter of pigs in implementing this policy.
:From January, 1964, until the end of November 367 outbreaks of swine fever were confirmed in Great Britain, as follows:
| January | … | … | … | 35 |
| February | … | … | … | 44 |
| March | … | … | … | 72 |
| April | … | … | … | 46 |
| May | … | … | … | 35 |
| June | … | … | … | 29 |
| July | … | … | … | 15 |
| August | … | … | … | 12 |
| September | … | … | … | 29 |
| October | … | … | … | 28 |
| November | … | … | … | 22 |
Subsidies (Late Claims)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many claims for cereal deficiencies, ploughing grants, hill cow subsidies and calf subsidies have been refused by his Department since 1963 up to the latest convenient date, owing to non-receipt by his Department before the due closing date; what is the amount of subsidy consequently lost to the agricultural industry; and if he will make a statement regarding future policy.
Figures for the numbers of late claims rejected in 1964 are not yet available, but I will send them to the hon. Member as soon as they are ready.I can, however, give the numbers of late claims rejected in 1963, in relation to the total number of claims; these are:
| — | Total claims received | Total late claims received | Late claims received |
| Cereals | 140,000 | 350 | 183 |
| Ploughing grants | 103,000 | 731 | 454 |
| Hills Cow subsidy | 15,000 | 207 | 77 |
Zambia
British South Africa Company (Mineral Royalties)
asked the Secretary of State for Commonwealth Relations what is the position regarding payment of the British Government's ex-gratia contribution to the settlement of the question of the mineral royalties in Zambia, formerly owned by the British South Africa Company.
Provision for this payment will be sought formally in the winter Supplementary Estimates. Should it be necessary to make payment before these Estimates are approved recourse will be had to the Civil Contingencies Fund.
Economic Affairs
Railway Communications, North-East (Consultation)
asked the First Secretary of State and Secretary of State for Economic Affairs, in view of the importance of communications in development plans for the North-East region, what steps he has taken to ensure that adequate consultation takes place between his Department, local authorities and British Railways before closure proposals are submitted.
As my hon. Friend has already been told, the North-East Development Group meets British Railways regularly to discuss railway communications in the North-East. As my right hon. Friend the Minister of Transport announced on 4th November, he has arranged for the Railways Board to give him particulars of passenger closure proposals before they are published, so that he may consider whether any particular case is clearly unacceptable at the outset. My Department will be fully consulted at this stage. In August, 1963, the local authorities, through their associations, were invited to inform the Minister of Transport, and any other Ministers affected, of their views on the non-hardship aspects of individual passenger closure proposals. On hardship matters, their representations are made to the Transport Users Consultative Committees.
Ministers Of State For Foreign Affairs
asked the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs if he will state the functions and terms of appointment of each of the four Ministers of State in the Foreign Office and the cost to Her Majesty's Government arising from each of those appointments.
My noble Friend, Lord Caradon, who receives a salary of £3,750, is the permanent United Kingdom representative at the United Nations in New York. My noble Friend Lord Chalfont, who also receives a salary of £3,750, deals expressly with disarmament. My hon. Friend the Member for Ogmore (Mr. Padley) and I, who at present act without salary or payment, have general responsibilities within the Foreign Office. In as far as there are terms attached to our appointments, they are those which apply to all members of Her Majesty's Government.
Home Department
"Murder" (Tables)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will bring up to the end of the year 1963 the figures given in the principal tables of the Home Office report "Murder" published in 1961.
Nine of the main tables in this publication have been enlarged to cover murders known to the police up to the end of 1963 and are reproduced below, together with an explanatory note.
Explanatory Note
1. The figures below have been compiled on the same basis as those in the Home Office Research Unit Report "Murder" (H.M.S.O. 1961), and the tables have been numbered to correspond with those in that report, to which page references are given. For purposes of comparison with previous years, convictions of manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility have been included in the same way as in the Report.
| 2. | Table 1
| (Murder, p. 4). |
Table 3
| (Murder, p. 6). | |
Table 4
| (Murder, p. 6). | |
Table 5
| (Murder, p. 7). |
The numbers of deaths finally recorded as murder which became known to the police in 1961, 1962 and 1963 showed only variations within the range that might be expected. The numbers of cases of diminished responsibility were unusually high in 1962 and 1963. In 1963 the high figure of 56 cases was balanced by a fall in the number of deaths eventually found not to be murder on some other ground. Although all diminished responsibility cases are included as murder for purposes of com- parison with earlier years, these will include cases which might have resulted in convictions for other manslaughter but for the availability of this special defence under the Homicide Act, 1957; this defence may now he increasingly used in place of others which would result in a reduction to manslaughter, such as provocation.
3. The number of suspects who committed suicide was unusually high in 1962, but reverted to normal in 1963. In 1960, 1961 and 1962 the number of suspects charged was greater than the associated number of victims, while in previous years the reverse was generally true; but in 1963 there was a return to the previous pattern.
4. Table 6 (Murder, p. 8).
As before, cases have been classified as "capital" and "non-capital" by the circumstances of the offence; the figures include cases in which the suspect committed suicide or was found to be mentally abnormal and was therefore not convicted of murder. The proportion of "capital" murders was slightly lower than usual in 1962 and 1963, but the fluctuations are no greater than might be expected.
5. Table 10 (Murder, p. 10).
The figures relate, as before, to convictions for capital murders which became known to the police in the year stated, even if the final conclusion was reached only in a later year. As before, convictions for capital murder have been analysed by type. Murders in the course of furtherance of theft amounted to 4 in 1961, 1 in 1962, and 2 in 1963. There have been similarly low figures in previous years, except for 1960. and no trend is apparent. Murder by shooting provided the usual 1 or 2 cases a year among those convicted. Most murders by shooting are, however, done by those who commit suicide or are mentally abnormal (Murder, paragraph 56).
| 6. | Table 25 | (Murder, p. 25). |
| Table 26 | (Murder, p. 26). |
There was a continuation of the tendency for diminished responsibility to replace insanity as a defence. The proportion of mentally abnormal offenders was unusually high in 1963, owing to the large number of cases of diminished responsibility. Table 26 shows that both before and after the Homicide Act the proportion of offenders actually convicted of murder remained at 31 per cent.
7. Table 41 (Murder, p. 38).
The proportion of non-capital murderers with previous convictions was rather higher in recent years than previously, and the proportion of capital murderers with previous convictions was rather lower.
Conclusion
The inclusion of three more years has not materially altered the picture provided by "Murder", except for the increase in verdicts of diminished responsibility, which may possibly be replacing other verdicts of manslaughter. The proportion of capital murders has not changed appreciably.
| TABLE 1 | ||||||
| FINALLY ADJUSTED NUMBERS OF MURDERS KNOWN TO THE POLICE, AND NUMBER OF OFFENCES REDUCED TO MANSLAUGHTER BY REASON OF DIMINISHED RESPONSIBILITY UNDER S. 2 OF THE HOMICIDE ACT 1957 | ||||||
| No. of victims | No. per million of homo population (a) of England and Wales | |||||
| Murder | s. 2 Manslaughter | Total | Murder | Murder and s. 2 Manslaughter | ||
| 1931–10 | annual average | 130 | — | 130 | 3·2 | 3·2 |
| 1941–50 | 152 | — | 152 | *
| *
| |
| 1951–55 | 137 | — | 137 | 3·1 | 3·1 | |
| 1956 | … | 150 | — | 150 | 3·4 | 3·4 |
| 1957 | … | 151 | 23 | 174 | 3·3 | 3·9 |
| 1958 | … | 125 | 28 | 153 | 2·8 | 3·4 |
| 1959 | … | 141 | 20 | 161 | 3·1 | 3·5 |
| 1960 | … | 135 | 31 | 166 | 3·0 | 3·7 |
| 1961 | … | 130 | 29 | 159 | 2·8 | 3·4 |
| 1962 | … | 142 | 37 | 179 | 3·0 | 3·8 |
| 1963 | … | 133 | 56 | 189 | 2·8 | 4·0 |
* No figure for home population is available for the war years, since this represents persons actually living in the country at the time. | ||||||
| TABLE 3 | ||||||||
| COMPARISONS BETWEEN DEATHS PROVISIONALLY AND FINALLY RECORDED AS DUE TO MURDER | ||||||||
| Deaths provisionally recorded as murder | Deaths found not to be murder excl. s. 2 cases) | Deaths found to be manslaughter under s. 2 (diminished responsibility) | Deaths finally recorded as murder | |||||
| No. | Per cent. | No. | Per cent. | No. | Per cent. | No. | Per cent. | |
| 1952 | 180 | 100·0 | 39 | 21·7 | — | — | 141 | 78·3 |
| 1953 | 174 | 100·0 | 34 | 19·5 | — | — | 140 | 80·5 |
| 1954 | 166 | 100·0 | 21 | 12·7 | — | — | 145 | 87·3 |
| 1955 | 152 | 100·0 | 19 | 12·5 | — | — | 133 | 87·5 |
| 1956 | 179 | 100·0 | 29 | 16·2 | — | — | 150 | 83·8 |
| 1957 | 224 | 100·0 | 50 | 22·3 | 23 | 10·3 | 151 | 67·4 |
| 1958 | 184 | 100·0 | 31 | 16·9 | 28 | 15·2 | 125 | 67·9 |
| 1959 | 192 | 100·0 | 31 | 16·2 | 20 | 10·4 | 141 | 73·4 |
| 1960 | 217 | 100·0 | 51 | 23·5 | 31 | 14·3 | 135 | 62·2 |
| 1961 | 214 | 100·0 | 55 | 25·7 | 29 | 13·6 | 130 | 60·7 |
| 1962 | 238 | 100·0 | 59 | 24·8 | 37 | 15·5 | 142 | 59·7 |
| 1963 | 225 | 100·0 | 36 | 16·0 | 56 | 24·9 | 133 | 59·1 |
| TABLE 4 | ||||||
| COMPARISON BETWEEN DEATHS PROVISIONALLY AND FINALLY RECORDED AS DUE TO MURDER BEFORE AND AFTER THE HOMICIDE ACT 1957 | ||||||
| Before Homicide Act: 1st January, 1952, to 20th March, 1957 | After Homicide Act: 21st March, 1957, to 31st December, 1963 | |||||
| No. | Annual Average | Percent. | No. | Annual Average | Percent. | |
| Deaths provisionally recorded as murder | 888 | 170 | 100 | 1,457 | 215 | 100 |
| Deaths found not to be murder or manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility (s. 2) | 150 | 29 | 16·9 | 305 | 45 | 20·9 |
| Deaths finally recorded as murder or man-slaughter by reason of diminished responsibility (s. 2) Murder | 735 | 140 | 82·8 | 931 | 137 | 63·9 |
| S. 2 Manslaughter | 3 | 1 | 0·3 | 221 | 33 | 15·2 |
| Total | 738 | 141 | 83·1 | 1,152 | 170 | 79·1 |
| TABLE 5 | ||||||||||
| NUMBER OF VICTIMS RELATED TO NUMBERS OF SUSPECTS | ||||||||||
| Deaths provisionally recorded as murder | Murders not cleared up | Death found not to be murder or s. 2 manslaughter | Murders cleared up (including s. 2 manslaughter) | |||||||
| No proceedings taken | Proceedings taken | |||||||||
| No. of victims | No. of victims | No. of victims | No. of victims | No. of suspects who committed suicide | No. of suspects who died or were detained in mental hospital | No. of victims | No. of suspects | |||
| 1952 | … | … | 180 | 8 | 39 | 48 | 36 | — | 85 | 76 |
| 1953 | … | … | 174 | 10 | 34 | 53 | 37 | 2 | 77 | 66 |
| 1954 | … | … | 166 | 10 | 21 | 59 | 38 | 1 | 76 | 72 |
| 1955 | … | … | 152 | 10 | 19 | 46 | 32 | 1 | 77 | 70 |
| 1956 | … | … | 179 | 11 | 29 | 56 | 39 | — | 83 | 85 |
| 1957 | … | … | 224 | 17 | 50 | 54 | 39 | — | 103 | 95 |
| 1958 | … | … | 184 | 15 | 31 | 46 | 38 | 2 | 92 | 89 |
| 1959 | … | … | 192 | 11 | 31 | 50 | 35 | — | 100 | 97 |
| 1960 | … | … | 217 | 9 | 51 | 45 | 39 | — | 112 | 126 |
| 1961 | … | … | 214 | 11 | 55 | 42 | 33 | 1 | 106 | 107 |
| 1962 | … | … | 238 | 13 | 59 | 58 | 45 | 2 | 108 | 112 |
| 1963 | … | … | 225 | 18 | 36 | 47 | 35 | 1 | 124 | 122 |
| Before Homicide Act (1.1.52 to 20.3.57): Annual Average | 170 | 9 | 29 | 52 | 36 | — | 80 | 74 | ||
| After Homicide Act (21.3..57 to 31.12.63): Annual Average | 215 | 14 | 45 | 49 | 38 | — | 107 | 108 | ||
| TABLE 6 | ||||||||||
| MURDERS KNOWN TO THE POLICE TOGETHER WITH OFFENCES REDUCED TO MANSLAUGHTER BY REASON OF DIMINISHED RESPONSIBILITY | ||||||||||
| ESTIMATED NUMBERS OF CAPITAL AND NON-CAPITAL OFFENCES | ||||||||||
| Capital | Non-capital | Total | ||||||||
| No. | Per cent. | No. | Per cent. | No. | Per cent. | |||||
| 1952 | … | … | … | … | 17 | 12·1 | 124 | 87·9 | 141 | 100·0 |
| 1953 | … | … | … | … | 17 | 12·1 | 123 | 87·9 | 140 | 100·0 |
| 1954 | … | … | … | … | 22 | 15·2 | 123 | 84·8 | 145 | 100·0 |
| 1955 | … | … | … | … | 15 | 11·3 | 118 | 88·7 | 133 | 100·0 |
| 1956 | … | … | … | … | 30 | 19·9 | 120 | 80·0 | 150 | 100·0 |
| 1957 | … | … | … | … | 23 | 13·2 | 151 | 86·8 | 174 | 100·0 |
| 1958 | … | … | … | … | 19 | 12·4 | 134 | 87·6 | 153 | 100·0 |
| 1959 | … | … | … | … | 23 | 14·3 | 138 | 85·7 | 161 | 100·0 |
| 1960 | … | … | … | … | 31 | 18·7 | 135 | 81·3 | 166 | 100·0 |
| 1961 | … | … | … | … | 20 | 12·6 | 139 | 87·4 | 159 | 100·0 |
| 1962 | … | … | … | … | 21 | 11·7 | 158 | 88·3 | 179 | 100·0 |
| 1963 | … | … | … | … | 22 | 11·6 | 167 | 88·4 | 189 | 100·0 |
| Before Homicide Act (1st January, 1952 to 20th March, 1957): Annual Average | 20 | 14·4 | 121 | 85·6 | 141 | 100·0 | ||||
| After Homicide Act (21st March, 1957 to 31st December, 1963): Annual Average | 23 | 13·5 | 147 | 86·5 | 170 | 100·0 | ||||
| TABLE 10 | |||||||
| CONVICTIONS FOR CAPITAL MURDER AND SIMILAR CONVICTIONS BEFORE THE HOMICIDE ACT | |||||||
| Convictions for capital murder under the Homicide Act 1957 | |||||||
| S. 5(a) | S. 5(b) | S. 5(c) | S. 5(d) | S. 5(e) | |||
| Murder in the course or furtherance of theft | Murder by shooting | Murder in the course of resisting arrest | Murder of policeman in course of duty | Murder of prison officer in course of duty | |||
| 1957 | Executed | … | 2 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Reprieved | … | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | |
| H.M.P. | … | 1 | — | — | — | — | |
| Total | … | 4 | 2 | — | — | — | |
| 1958 | Executed | … | 4 | — | — | 1 | — |
| Reprieved | … | 1 | — | — | — | — | |
| Total | … | 5 | — | — | 1 | — | |
| 1959 | Executed | … | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Reprieved | … | 1 | — | — | — | — | |
| Total | … | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | — | |
| 1960 | Executed | … | 6 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Reprieved: | … | 1 | — | — | 1 | — | |
| H.M.P. | … | 2 | — | — | — | — | |
| Total | … | 9 | 1 | — | 1 | — | |
| 1961 | Executed | … | 2 | 2 | — | — | — |
| Reprieved | … | 1 | — | — | — | — | |
| H.M.P. | … | 1 | — | — | — | — | |
| Total | … | 4 | 2 | — | — | — | |
| 1962 | Executed | … | 1 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Total | … | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | |
| 1963 | Executed | … | 2 | — | — | — | — |
| Reprieved | … | — | 2 | — | — | — | |
| Total | … | 2 | 2 | — | — | — | |
| Similar Convictions for murder before the Act | |||||||
| 1955 | Executed | … | 1 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Reprieved | … | 1 | — | — | — | — | |
| Total | … | 2 | 1 | — | — | — | |
| 1956 | Reprieved | … | 4 | 5 | — | — | — |
| H.M.P. | … | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | |
| Total | … | 5 | 6 | — | — | — | |
| 1957 | Reprieved | … | 2 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Total | … | 2 | 1 | — | — | — | |
| TABLE 25 | ||||||||||||
| DISPOSAL OF SUSPECTS IN CASES FINALLY CLASSIFIED AS MURDER OR AS MANSLAUGHTER BY REASON OF DIMINISHED RESPONSIBILITY | ||||||||||||
| Date at which crime became known to Police | Committed suicide | Insane | Convicted of murder and | Convicted of manslaughter under s. 2 | Acquitted or discharged | Other | Total | |||||
| Executed | Imprisoned | H.M.P. * | ||||||||||
| 1955 | … | … | … | 32 | 41 | 9 | 14 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | 103 |
| 1956 | … | … | … | 39 | 30 | — | 31 | 4 | — | 16 | 4 | 124 |
| 1957 | … | … | … | 39 | 20 | 3 | 32 | 1 | 20 | 16 | 3 | 134 |
| 1958 | … | … | … | 38 | 19 | 5 | 20 | 1 | 27 | 16 | 3 | 129 |
| 1959 | … | … | … | 35 | 25 | 4 | 40 | 1 | 19 | 8 | — | 132 |
| 1960 | … | … | … | 39 | 22 | 7 | 36 | 3 | 30 | 27 | 1 | 165 |
| 1961 | … | … | … | 33 | 19 | 4 | 34 | 2 | 27 | 21 | 1 | 141 |
| 1962 | … | … | … | 45 | 15 | 2 | 40 | 2 | 33 | 20 | 2 | 159 |
| 1963 | … | … | … | 35 | 12 | 2 | 33 | 1 | 52 | 21 | 2 | 158 |
| Before Homicide Act (1st January, 1955 to 20th March, 1957) | 78 | 73 | 9 | 55 | 5 | 3 | 22 | 6 | 251 | |||
| After Homicide Act (21st March, 1957 to 31st December, 1963 | 257 | 130 | 27 | 225 | 11 | 205 | 128 | 11 | 994 | |||
* Persons under 18 ordered to be detained during Her Majesty's Pleasure. | ||||||||||||
| TABLE 26 | |||||
| CATEGORIES OF OFFENDER AND ANNUAL AVERAGES | |||||
| NUMBER OF OFFENDERS | |||||
| Date at which crime became known to police | Committed suicide | Insane | Convicted of manslaughter under s. 2 | Convicted and sentenced for murder | Total |
| Before Homicide Act (1.1.55 to 20.3.57): | |||||
| Number | 78 | 73 | 3 | 69 | 223 |
| Percent | 35·0 | 32·7 | 1·4 | 30·9 | 100·0 |
| Annual Average | 35 | 33 | (1) | 31 | 100 |
| After Homicide Act(21.3.57to 31.12.63): | |||||
| Number | 257 | 130 | 205 | 263 | 855 |
| Per cent. | 30·0 | 15·2 | 24·0 | 30·8 | 100·0 |
| Annual Average | 38 | 19 | 30 | 39 | 126 |
| TABLE 41 | ||||||
| TYPES OF PREVIOUS CONVICTIONS AMONG MEN CONVICTED OF CAPITAL AND NON-CAPITAL MURDER (SINCE THE HOMICIDE ACT, 1957) | ||||||
| — | Capital murder | Non-capital murder | ||||
| Number | Per cent. | Number | Per cent. | |||
| Previous offences: | ||||||
| Sexual | … | … | 1 | 2·5 | 13 | 6·0 |
| Violent. | … | … | 6 | 15·0 | 48 | 22·3 |
| Both | … | … | 3 | 7·5 | 7 | 3·3 |
| All offences against the person | … | … | 10 | 25·0 | 68 | 31·6 |
| Offences against property only | … | … | 19 | 47·5 | 62 | 28 8 |
| No previous convictions | … | … | 11 | 27·5 | 85 | 39·6 |
| Total | … | … | 40 | 100·0 | 215 | 100·0 |
Employment
Swansea
asked the Minister of Labour how many disabled people are registered for, but unable to find, employment in Swansea.
On 9th November the number of registered disabled persons registered as unemployed at the Swansea Employment Exchange and Youth Employment Bureau was 329.
asked the Minister of Labour what proportion of workers is employed in manufacturing, and what proportion in service trades, in Swansea; and how these figures compare with national figures.
The following table gives the position at mid-1963 the latest date for which figures are available.
| Area | Manufacturing Industries | Service Industries |
| Per cent. | Per cent. | |
| Swansea Employment Exchanges | 25·3 | 73·6 |
| Great Britain | 38·2 | 56·3 |
asked the Minister of Labour how many, and what proportion of Swansea school leavers obtained apprenticeships this year; and how these figures compared with the national proportion.
The figures for 1st January to 31st October 1964 are as follows:
| — | Boys | Girls | ||
| Number | Per cent. | Number | Per cent. | |
| Swansea | 212 | 20·6 | 33 | 3·8 |
| Great Britain | 110,729 | 36·6 | 16,279 | 5·8 |
Pensions And National Insurance
National Assistance
asked the Minister of Penions and National Insurance on what assumptions regarding the number of people eligible for National Assistance and the amounts they will be paid her estimates of the total cost of increasing national assistance rates were based.
The estimate of the cost of the proposed increases in National Assistance rates given in the Explanatory Memorandum (Cmnd. 2522) published with the draft National Assistance (Determination of Need) Amendment Regulations, 1964, is, as stated in the memorandum, related to existing cases. As for assumptions about future numbers, I would refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave him on 8th December.
Post Office
New Office, Blyth
asked the Postmaster-General what progress has been made with the new post office at Blyth; and what are the prospects of its being put into use at an early date.
The new public counter is expected to be ready during February, 1965, and the sorting office about a month later. I am arranging for my hon. Friend to be kept informed of progress.An additional temporary office is being brought into use during Christmas.
Transport
River Mersey, Stockport (Fencing)
asked the Minister of Transport what progress has so far been achieved in his consultations with the Mersey River Board and the Borough of Stockport to provide effective fencing along the Gorsey Bank stretch of the River Mersey at Stockport and thus give reasonable protection to the residents and particularly to school children.
I have not engaged in any such consultations, nor am I aware that I have any responsibility in this matter. I have, however, written to my hon. Friend.
National Finance
General Election (Cost)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the estimated cost to public funds involved in the holding of the General Election.
About £1,850,000.
North-East (Government Bookshop)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in view of the future development in the North-East, if he will place a retail sales branch of Her Majesty's Stationery Office in the region.
The present demand for official publications in the North-East would not justify the opening of a Government Bookshop there, but developments in the region will be kept under review by Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
Corporation And Capital Gains Taxes
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what calculation he has made of the reduction in the cost of the investment allowance and other capital allowances that will result from the arrangements for a corporation tax;(2) what calculation he has made of the loss of net income, if any, that will be suffered by charitable and similar organisations as a result of the introduction of a corporation tax on the profits of companies;(3) whether the capital gains tax will provide for the level of tax to be related to the period for which the assets are held before realisation;(4) whether, in order to avoid double taxation, in all cases where the overseas tax paid by a corporation exceeds the amount it is liable to pay in corporation tax, he will arrange for the excess to be offset in computing the tax liability of shareholders on dividends distributed, or otherwise.
I have nothing further to add to my Answer of 8th December.
Wales
Local Authority Areas (White Paper)
asked the Secretary of State for Wales whether he intends to publish a White Paper showing Her Majesty's Government's proposals for reconsidering the functions and boundaries of local authority areas.
These matters are being carefully considered, and in due course I hope to publish a White Paper.
Council For Wales
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what are Her Majesty's Government's proposals regarding the future functions of the Council for Wales.
I shall review the position of the Council in the light of the new economic planning machinery that is to be created. For the time being I have asked that the Council should continue the work it is already doing under its original terms of reference.