Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 725: debated on Monday 28 February 1966

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Monday, 28th February, 1966

Channel Islands (Concentration Camp Detainees)

7.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs why compensation is being denied to citizens of the Channel Islands deported to Germany during the Second World War, notwithstanding the agreement between Her Majesty's Government and the Federal Republic of Germany on 9th June 1964.

Persons from the Channel Islands are eligible to receive compensation on the same terms as other United Kingdom nationals, that is to say, if they were detained in Concentration Camps or comparable institutions. A number have qualified. The conditions of eligibility are set out in the Notes for Guidance of which I have sent my hon. Friend a copy.

Peru (Mantaro River Project)

39.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what representations he has made to the Government of Peru relating to the cancellation of the Mantaro River project, in which British firms are concerned; and with what effect.

The Mantaro River project as such has not been cancelled. The Peruvian Government have terminated the negotiations with the Anglo-German Consortium which were to have proceeded in accordance with the contract signed with them in 1962. Under this contract the Consortium was to undertake the Mantaro project, and work had already been started. The Consortium is now endeavouring to reach an understanding as to the present position in negotiations with the Peruvian authorities. There are at present no grounds for representations to the Peruvian Government by Her Majesty's Government.

Council Of Europe (Working Party Recommendation)

40.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what steps he is taking to implement Recommenda- tion 448 of the Council of Europe Working Party, with particular reference to paragraph 6, where it is stated that the Council of Europe provides a suitable framework for certain measures of co-operation between the European Economic Community and the European Free Trade Association.

I have nothing to add to my reply to the hon. Member for Cheltenham (Mr. Dodds-Parker) on 21st February.

War Graves Cemetery, Mount Scopus

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what progress has been made towards obtaining the agreement of the Governments of Israel and Jordan to effective and permanent arrangements for the rehabilitation and maintenance of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission's cemetery on Mount Scopus; and if he will make a statement.

I am glad to be able to tell the hon. Member that through the good offices of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organisation arrangements have now been agreed upon for the rehabilitation and maintenance of this cemetery. The Commonwealth War Graves Commission team, who will undertake the work, have arrived.

Arabian Peninsula (British Interests)

42.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what arrangements he is making to protect British interests in the Arabian peninsula.

Her Majesty's Government are satisfied that existing arrangements for protecting British interests in the Arabian Peninsula are adequate. We maintain close and friendly ties with all States in the peninsula.

Yemen

43.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what initiative he is taking to promote a peaceful settlement of the war in the Yemen and thus to protect British interests.

None. Our policy in the Yemen remains one of non-involvement. As I told the House on 13th December, it is our hope that the Yemenis themselves will be able to achieve a peaceful settlement of the conflict.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what action is being taken by Her Majesty's Government, directly or through the United Nations, to help those who have suffered from the war in the Yemen.

The international Committee of the Red Cross have been active in relief work in the Yemen. Her Majesty's Government make an annual contribution of £10,000 to the International Committee's administrative expenses.

Rhodesian Information Office, Washington

44.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what representations have been made to the United States Government by Her Majesty's Government about the opening of the Rhodesian Information Office in Washington; and what reply was received.

We have expressed to the United States Government our concern at the opening of this office in Washington. The latter have explained that they have no legal power to close it. At the same time they have made it clear in a public statement that the fact that here are these legal obstacles in no way implies that the United States Government recognise the régime about which the Office purports to provide information or approve of its activities.

Rhodesia (South African Oil Supplies)

45.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what official representations have been made to the Republic of South Africa about supplies of oil going from there to Rhodesia; and what reply was received.

Her Majesty's Ambassador in South Africa has expressed our serious concern to the South African Government about the movement of petrol, oil and lubricants from South Africa to Rhodesia. My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister spoke similarly to the South African Ambassador in London on 19th February. The South African Government have reaffirmed their policy of not participating in boycotts.

Consular Officers

46.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs if he will state, by such regional groupings as may be convenient, but including the United States of America separately, what are the theoretical and average current actual periods consuls-general and consuls spend in each post.

The length of tours varies according to conditions at the post, the needs of the Service, and the personal circumstances of the officers concerned. Normally, however, it is the aim that Consular officers should spend in the:

U.S.A.Four years
South-East Asia and Far EastThree to four years
Western EuropeFour years
Sino-Soviet blocTwo years
Middle EastThree to four years
East AfricaThree to four years
The expense of calculating the actual average period spent over an arbitrary period of, say, ten years would not in my opinion be justified.I have no reason to suppose that practice differs significantly from theory.I should be glad to consider the case of any particular officer whom my hon. Friend has in mind, though I must point out that the Secretary of State must reserve the right to lengthen or shorten the tours of individual officers, as he sees fit, to meet the needs of the Service.

Vietnam

48.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs if he will make a statement on his discussions with the United States Government's representatives in Washington; and, in particular, what is the Government's policy regarding the resumption of the bombing of North Vietnam by United States forces.

I have nothing to add to the statements made by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister and myself during the debate on 8th February.

51.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs if he will publish in HANSARD that part of his letter to the hon. Member for Barking, dated 4th February, 1966, referring to the use of chemical sprays in Vietnam.

I am arranging for the whole of my letter to the hon. Member for Barking (Mr. Driberg) of 4th February to be published in the OFFICIAL REPORT. The hon. Member has agreed that his letter should be published with it.Following are the letters:27th January, 1966.The Rt. Hon. Michael Stewart, M.P.,Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs,Downing Street, S.W.1.I should be obliged if you would consider the enclosed letter from a correspondent who is a constituent of Peter Agnew's, to whom he has also written.Is it, in fact, the case that the Americans are spraying the rice-fields—presumably with poison—in order to create starvation? If so, is such action justifiable, even on the loosest interpretation of what is legitimate in war, and is it likely to enlist for the Americans and the South Vietnamese Government the sympathy of the possibly neutral peasants, whose main source of food is thus destroyed?I hope that it may be possible for you to exercise some influence on the American Government to check this inhumane practice.Yours sincerely, (Signed)TOM DRIBERG, M.P.Foreign Office, S.W.1.4th February, 1966.Tom Driberg, Esq., M.P.Thank you for your letter of 27th January with which you enclosed a letter from a correspondent about Vietnam.I understand that measures are taken to destroy rice crops or rice stores which are known to support the Viet Cong in South Vietnam. The aim is certainly not to create starvation amongst the people, but to cut off the supplies which sustain the Viet Cong guerrillas. I understand too that the spray is designed to kill the rice but is not poisonous: it is equivalent to burning or blowing up a store of rice once collected and held for Viet Cong supplies.Nevertheless such activities inevitably must sometimes hurt the innocent and I would only say once more what I have said on many occasions in the past year, that the conflict in Vietnam causes terrible and widespread suffering which we should all be determined to bring to an end; the only way to bring this to an end is to stop the fighting and it is those who insist on continuing the fighting who must bear the ultimate responsibility for the devastation now caused. We have just seen the failure suffered in recent weeks by the United States in their efforts to bring about negotiations. In earlier months we saw the failure of the efforts from many different quarters to persuade the North Vietnamese to negotiate. We must continue to hope that they will change their attitude. Meanwhile the British Government will continue whatever the disappointments to strive for an end of hostilities in Vietnam and a settlement which will at last bring a secure peace to that country.(Sgd.) Michael Stewart.

58.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether, in view of the facts that the policy of publicly supporting the United States war in Vietnam while privately working for peace in Washington has failed to check the intensification and spread of the war and of its menace to world peace, and that this policy has left Great Britain in a small minority on the Security Council and in the Commonwealth, and is rejected by a wide section of the British people, he will now reconsider this policy.

Our objective remains the promotion of a negotiated settlement in Vietnam and I am confident that this will continue to enjoy the support, both at home and abroad, of all those who reject the idea of a military solution.

Laos (American Air Attacks)

52.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs if he will bring to the attention of the Security Council, as a threat to international peace, the attacks made by the United States Air Force on Laos.

Syria (British Subjects)

54.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs if he will make a statement on the safety of British subjects as a result of the recent coup d'état in Syria.

Our Ambassador in Syria has been in touch with a substantial number of British subjects in Damascus and they are all safe and sound.Her Majesty's Consul at Aleppo, who was in touch with our Embassy at Ankara by telephone on the morning of 24th February, reported that all is well with the British community there.

Kuwait (Exchange Of Notes)

55.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs if he will specify the nature of the treaties and understandings under which an obligation exists to assist Kuwait, as referred to in Chapter II, paragraph 3, of Part II of the Statement on the Defence Estimates.

The reference is to the Exchange of Notes of 19th June, 1961 (Cmnd. 1409). The relevant subparagraph reads:

"Nothing in these conclusions shall affect the readiness of Her Majesty's Government to assist the Government of Kuwait if the latter request such assistance."
The full text of the Exchange of Notes is available in the Library of the House.

Bahrain, Qatar And The Trucial States (Defence Obligations)

56.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs if he will specify the nature of the treaties and understandings under which obligations exist to defend Bahrain, Qatar, Muscat and Oman, and the Trucial States, respectively, as referred to in Chapter II, paragraph 3, of Part II of the Statement on the Defence Estimates.

Our defence obligations to Bahrain, Qatar and the Trucial States derive from various treaties and agreements dating back as far as 1820, copies of which are to be found in the Library of the House. We have no treaty obligation to defend Muscat and Oman but we have a long history of friendship with the Sultanate and we have on a number of occasions in the past provided assistance when requested to do so in the general interest of peace and stability in this area of the Middle East.

Slavery (Ratification Of Convention)

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether the Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade and Institutions and Practices similar to Slavery have been ratified by the United Kingdom or not; in the latter case, what are the reasons for the delay; and what steps must be taken to ensure its ratification in the near future.

Ilo Conventions (Ratification)

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether the International Labour Organisation Convention concerning the Abolition of Forced Labour has been ratified by the United Kingdom or not; in the latter case, what are the reasons for the delay; and what steps must be taken to ensure its ratification in the near future.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs (1) whether the International Labour Organisation Convention concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation has been ratified by the United Kingdom or not; in the latter case, what are the reasons for the delay; and what steps must be taken to ensure its ratification in the near future;(2) whether the International Labour Organisation Convention concerning Equal Remuneration for Men and Women Workers for Work of Equal Value has been ratified by the United Kingdom or not; in the latter case, what are the reasons for the delay; and what steps must be taken to ensure its ratification in the near future.

The United Kingdom has not ratified either the I.L.O. Convention on discrimination in respect of employment and occupation or that on equal remuneration. Her Majesty's Government fully accept the general principles set out in the Convention concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation and the principle of equal pay for equal work. They are, however, unable to ratify either Convention at present because, in the matter of equal pay, the present position in the United Kingdom is not fully in accordance with all the detailed requirements of these instruments. In this connection I would refer the hon. Member to the reply by my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Labour on 31st January to the hon. Member for Clapham (Mrs. McKay).

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether the International Labour Organisation Convention concerning Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise has been ratified by the United Kingdom or not; in the latter case, what are the reasons for the delay; and what steps must be taken to ensure its ratification in the near future.

Discrimination In Education (Unesco Convention)

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, whether the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation Convention against Discrimination in Education has been ratified by the United Kingdom or not; in the latter case, what are the reasons for the delay; and what steps must be taken to ensure its ratification in the near future.

The United Kingdom deposited an instrument of acceptance on 14th March, 1962. In addition, the United Kingdom accepted the Protocol to the Convention, instituting a Conciliation and Good Offices Commission, on 8th January, 1964.

Genocide (Un Convention)

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide has been ratified by the United Kingdom or not; in the latter case, what are the reasons for the delay; and what steps must be taken to ensure its ratification in the near future.

As my hon. Friend the Minister of State said in the House on 15th November, 1965, Her Majesty's Government have decided that the United Kingdom should accede to this Convention. It is now necessary to introduce legislation to bring our domestic law into line with the Convention. This will be done as soon as the legislative programme permits. Accession will take place as soon as possible after the legislation has been enacted.

Political Rights Of Women (Un Convention)

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether the Convention on the Political Rights of Women has been ratified by the United Kingdom or not; in the latter case, what are the reasons for the delay; and what steps must be taken to ensure its ratification in the near future.

I have nothing to add at the present time to the replies of 31st January and 11th February given by my hon. Friend the Minister of State to the hon. Member for Clapham (Mrs. McKay).

Racial Discrimination (United Nations Convention)

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination has been ratified by the United Kingdom or not; in the latter case, what are the reasons for the delay; and what steps must be taken to ensure its ratification in the near future.

The United Kingdom has not ratified this Convention which was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 21st December, 1965. The question of possible United Kingdom ratification is now being studied. It is necessary to ensure that law and practice both in the United Kingdom and in the overseas territories are broadly in line with the terms of the Convention before it can be ratified.

Western European Union Assembly (Recommendation)

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what action he has taken, as recommended by paragraph 3, page 3, of Document 354 of the Western European Union Assembly, to evolve a common European approach to the problems of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and other international issues.

This recommendation is under consideration by the Council of Western European Union, where Her Majesty's Government are discussing it with their allies.

British Visitor's Passport

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs to what extent British visitor's passports continue to be in demand; and whether any change is proposed in the procedure for obtaining them.

These simplified passports continue to be very popular. About 600,000 were issued in 1965 and it is very possible that the number may be even higher in 1966.Unhappily there has been increasing evidence that some people have obtained British Visitor's Passports fraudulently. I have therefore arranged that from 1st March all applicants will be required to produce for inspection one of the following: a National Health Service medical card or a birth certificate or, in the case of retired persons, a Retirement Pension Book. It will also be necessary in the case of joint passports for the wife to attend at the issuing office with her husband so that her photograph and signature on the passport, as well as those of the husband, may be verified at the time of issue.The British Visitor's Passport will continue to be obtainable on demand from any local office of the Ministry of Labour, provided the necessary documents are produced, and the fee will remain 7s. 6d. (compared with £1 10s. 0d. for a normal passport).

Land And Natural Resources

Land Commission Bill

61.

asked the Minister of Land and Natural Resources whether, in view of the fact that the replies sent by his Department to individual inquirers, as to the likely effect of the Land Commission Bill on transactions taking place before and after the proposed Appointed Days under that measure, relate in many cases to matters akin to taxation and may be of commercial value to the recipients, he will publish in an appropriate form the general purport and effect of these replies.

No. Most of the inquiries sought clarification of the White Paper's intentions pending publication of the Bill, and the answers are generally to be found in the Bill itself. My Department has tried to be as helpful as possible in all cases, and I know of none where an inquirer has been given any unfair commercial advantage. If the right hon. Gentleman has any such case in mind I hope he will let me know of it.

Hospitals

Young Chronic Sick

63.

asked the Minister of Health if he will ask the regional hospital boards to provide statistics of the number of young chronic sick in the different age groups in long stay in general wards, so that a more thorough study of the problems of the young chronic sick can be made.

A study of the hospital needs of the young chronic sick is in progress and the information mentioned is being obtained.

Physics Technicians

asked the Minister of Health how many persons were taken into training during each of the last five years as hospital physics technicians at regional radiotherapy departments; how many of such trainees completed their training; how many of such trainees, having completed their training, remain in service with the National Health Service; and whether he is satisfied with the present level of recruitment and remuneration of hospital physics technicians.

I regret that information is not available in the form required nor separately for radiotherapy departments. A recent inquiry shows that at 30th September, 1965, there were 67 technicians-in-training in post against establishements of 69 although in the year since 30th September, 1964, 22 trainees had left the hospital service, 11 of them before completing one year's training. The total number of hospital physics technicians has increased by about 10 per cent. each year since 1961 but further expansion is needed. Salary scales are currently under review by the Whitley Council.

asked the Minister of Health what is the establishment for hospital physics technicians at the Newcastle, Birmingham, and Clatterbridge regional radiotherapy departments; to what extent such establishments are sufficient for departmental needs now and 18 months hence; what is the present number of vacancies at each such establishment; and what steps he is taking to recruit sufficient hospital physics technicians to fill existing vacancies at each such establishment.

Establishments in the radiotherapy departments at the Newcastle, Birmingham and Clatterbridge centres are 7, 5 and 11 and vacancies are 4, 2 and 1 respectively. Establishments are a matter for each hospital authority; future establishments have not been fixed but generally more technicians are required for this expanding service. The employing authorities are responsible for recruitment but my Department supports their efforts by distributing careers literature.

Physics And Medical Laboratory Technicians (Pay)

asked the Minister of Health whether he will set out in the OFFICIAL REPORT a table showing the basic and maximum rates of pay during each of the last five years for hospital physics technicians and medical and laboratory technicians, respectively, and the percentage increase in such rates of pay during the same periods.

The rates during the period since January 1961 are:

Physics Laboratory TechnicianMedical Laboratory Technician
Basic Grade MinimumTop Grade MaximumBasic Grade MinimumTop Grade Maximum
££££
19615701,1305951,230
19626301,2506751,600
19636491,2887001,665
19646681,3277211,715
19656681,3278051,975
The average increase over that period for each class is:—

Physics Laboratory TechnicianMedical Laboratory Technician
17·2 per cent.45 per cent.
The 1965 salary scales of medical laboratory technicians were announced in July, 1965. The salary scales of physics laboratory technicians are currently under review by the Whitley Council.

Elderly And Mentally Disordered Patients

asked the Minister of Health what guidance he has given to hospital authorities concerning the practice of removing spectacles, dentures and hearing aids from elderly or mentally disordered patients.

Hospital authorities have been advised that mentally disordered or elderly confused patients should be allowed to retain such aids and other personal belongings; and where it is necessary, exceptionally, to remove them, that this should only be done on medical advice.

St Cross Hospital, Rugby (X-Ray Equipment)

asked the Minister of Health what is the cost of the X-ray equipment lying in packing cases in a corridor of St. Cross Hospital, Rugby, for the last 18 months; and when it is proposed to commence the construction of a building in which use can be made of it.

The equipment cost £12,551. Construction of accommodation for it is expected to start in April.

Hospital Development (East Anglia)

asked the Minister of Health in what regards the Hospital Plan has been increased for East Anglia, in view of the Government's population expansion schemes.

I would ask the hon. Member to await the result of the current review.

Child Patients, Wales (Mothers' Accommodation)

asked the Minister of Health how many hospitals in Wales with children's wards have one bed normally available for visiting mothers; and how many have more than one such bed available.

Four and seven respectively. A further fifteen are able to make special arrangements when required.

asked the Minister of Health what proportion of hospitals in Wales which have children's wards have beds normally available for visiting mothers; and how this proportion compares with the United Kingdom figures.

Twenty-four per cent., compared with 30 per cent., for England and Wales together. Figures for the United Kingdom are not readily available.

Ministry Of Health

Cervical Cancer

64.

asked the Minister of Health if he will make a statement on the detection of cervical cancer, following the survey carried out by the Office of Health Economics.

My policy is that a routine screening service for the detection of cervical cancer should be made available to all women at risk.

Disabled (Training Of Handcraft Teachers)

65 and 66.

asked the Minister of Health (1) whether he will seek to make a grant in aid to the Handcrafts Advisory Association for the purpose of training teachers of the disabled;(2) whether he will initiate a system of recognised training for handcraft teachers of the disabled.

My right hon. Friend is not yet satisfied that the functions of this type of staff are sufficiently well defined to justify formal training arrangements or the making of a grant for the purpose.

General Practitioners (Practice Expenses)

67.

asked the Minister of Health what repayment is made to a doctor under the National Health Service when he makes a telephone call to get a free ambulance to take a National Health Service patient to have a free out-patient consultation.

The practice expenses of general medical practitioners, including the cost of telephone calls, are credited to the central pool of remuneration and included in the calculation of the gross fees payable to them.

Day Nurseries

asked the Minister of Health what was the total cost, in the last year for which figures are available for England and Wales, of the provision and maintenance and operation of day nurseries under the National Health Service Act 1946 and the Nurseries and Child-Minders Regulation Act 1948; and what proportion and part of such total costs were borne, respectively, by local authorities, by the Exchequer and by persons availing themselves of the services referred to.

The total cost of day nurseries provided by local health authorities under the National Health Service Act 1946 was approximately £5 million in 1964–65, of which about one-fifth was borne by persons using the service. Some 60 per cent. of the expenditure of local authorities as a whole on this and other general grant services is borne by the Exchequer through the General and Rate Deficiency Grants.Information about the cost of nurseries registered under the Nurseries and Child-Minders Regulation Act, 1948 is not available.

Prescriptions

asked the Minister of Health to what extent the increase in the number of prescriptions dispensed by pharmacists in general practice is due to the number of out-patient departments which, because of inadequate staff, have been obliged to issue E.C.10 prescription forms to meet the requirements of their patients.

Between 1st February and 30th November, 1965, retail chemists dispensed 576,435 more prescriptions for hospital out-patients than in the corresponding period in 1964. This constituted 1·8 per cent of the total increase in the number of prescriptions dispensed by retail chemists.

Doctors (Emigration)

asked the Minister of Health what is the most recent estimate of the number of British doctors emigrating overseas.

The best estimate available is that on average the net loss of British doctors by emigration is between 300 and 350 a year. My Department is engaged on studies to provide more exact statistics.

Incorrect deductions have been drawn from the inclusion in the Report of the Oversea Migration Board for 1964 of an estimate of a net balance of 900 doctors leaving the United Kingdom for all destinations for one year or more. This figure relates to people who described themselves to interviewers as doctors, and not all of whom will have been qualified medical practitioners; it covers moreover people who are citizens of the United Kingdom and Colonies of whom some would not normally be resident in Britain and others would not be emigrating for good. The sample used for purposes of the report was in any event so small that, as the report indicates the estimated total derived therefrom is subject to a wide margin of error.

Cervical Cancer Screening Service (Sherborne)

asked the Minister of Health what cervical cancer screening service is available to women at risk in the Sherborne district.

A screening service is available now, and is being increasingly used.

Cervical Cancer Screening Service (Southampton)

asked the Minister of Health what cervical cancer screening service is available to women at risk in the Southampton district.

A diagnostic service only is provided at present, but a screening service will be started in May.

Cervical Cancer Screening Service (Clevedon)

asked the Minister of Health what cervical cancer screening service is available to women at risk in the Clevedon district.

Clevedon is served by the Southmead Hospital Group laboratory which examines smears taken from patients attending gynaecological and obstetric out-patient departments and women attending Family Planning Clinics. Laboratory facilities at Southmead are being expanded to support the introduction of full-scale screening and I am about to approve Somerset County Council's proposals to start clinics as soon as these facilities are available.

Cervical Cancer Screening Service (Woking)

asked the Minister of Health what cervical cancer screening service is available to women at risk in the Woking district.

A local authority clinic should be open later this year. A diagnostic service is already available for women with symptoms.

Ministry Of Labour

Selly Oak Employment Exchange

68.

asked the Minister of Labour whether he is aware that on days when there are large numbers of men waiting for payment of benefit at the Selly Oak employment exchange, the facilities there are inadequate and involve long waits in conditions of discomfort; and what plans he has for immediate improvements.

The premises at Selly Oak Employment Exchange are adequate for normal business. The number of unemployed registering at this office sometimes fluctuates violently, however, because of temporary stoppages of work in the motor industry. It would be uneconomical permanently to maintain large premises to deal with these relatively infrequent and short-term increases of unemployment, but every effort is made to reduce inconvenience to the public to a minimum. The local arrangements at Selly Oak to deal with this type of situation are being reviewed.

Shipyards

69.

asked the Minister of Labour what were the numbers of persons employed in the United Kingdom shipyards in 1965; and how these figures compare with 1964, 1963, 1962, and 1961, respectively.

It is estimated there were 163,000 employees in employment in shipbuilding and ship-repairing in the United Kingdom in mid-1965. Corresponding figures for the four preceding mid-years were 156,000 in 1964, 161,000 in 1963, 179,000 in 1962 and 189,000 in 1961. A revised estimate for 1965 will be available in the near future and I will write to the hon. Member to give him the figures.

Aircraft Industry

70.

asked the Minister of Labour how many men have left the aircraft industry since October, 1964; and how many of these have found other employment in British export industries.

Provisional estimates show that males employed in the aircraft industry fell by 10,600 between October, 1964 and November, 1965. Information on workers who have entered other industries is available only in respect of those who became redundant following the cancellation last year of certain aircraft orders and whose new employment is known to our local offices. 19 per cent. were re-employed in the aircraft industry, 52 per cent. went into metal-using industries other than aircraft and 29 per cent. into other industries. I cannot say how many went into work connected with exports.

Dismissal Procedures

71.

asked the Minister of Labour what steps he proposes to take to ensure that all employees enjoy proper safeguards against arbitrary dismissal.

The subject of dismissal procedures is being considered by a Committee of my right hon. Friend's National Joint Advisory Council. When the Committee reports he will consider with the Council what action should be taken.

Restrictive Practices

72.

asked the Minister of Labour what success he has so far had in securing the abandonment of the restrictive labour practices that are identified in reports of the National Board for Prices and Incomes.

As the reports make clear, these are problems which must be tackled jointly by the managements and unions in the industries concerned. The Government will continue to encourage the necessary action by managements and unions and my right hon. Friend is always ready to give any help he can in negotiations.

Banks (Five-Day Week)

asked the Minister of Labour what representations have been made to him regarding the question of the five-day week for those engaged in the banking services; if he will give favourable advice to the banking organisations concerned; and if he will make a statement.

I have received no representations regarding a five-day working week for bank employees. This is a matter for discussion between employers and the organisations representing their staff. I would refer my hon. Friend to the answer given to the hon. Member for Aberdeen, North on Monday, 21st February.

Ministry Of Defence

F111 Aircraft

74.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether the F111 will be armed with nuclear bombs; whether they will be capable of being used in the tactical nuclear rôle; and whether they will be available for use without prior consultation with the United States or any other of Great Britain's allies.

As I have often said, our primary need is to replace the Canberra as a tactical strike/reconnaissance aircraft carrying conventional weapons. But the F111 will be able to carry British nuclear weapons. The answer to the final part of the question is "yes".

75.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what will be the main differences as regards avionics between the first 10 F111A aircraft and the remaining 40 which are to be purchased.

76.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what will be the difference between the unit ceiling price of the first 10 F111A aircraft and the subsequent purchase of 40.

As indicated on page 11 of Part I of the Statement on the Defence Estimates 1966 (Cmnd. 2901), the ceiling unit price applies to the total purchase.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what are the credit terms he has negotiated with the United States Government, including the rate of interest and the rate of payment of instalments, for the purchase of 50 F111 As.

The credits will cover the capital cost of the aircraft and associated equipment. The repayment terms, which apply to the Hercules-Phantom-F111A programme taken as a whole, provide that the bulk of repayments will fall due in the period 1968–78, being spread as evenly as possible. Interest is at 4¾ per cent.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what arrangements he has negotiated with the United States Government for the purchase of spare parts for the F111A, and the prices to be charged for them.

Under our arrangement with the United States, we have the opportunity to enter into a co-operative logistics supply support agreement under which we will enjoy the same production price and other benefits as the U.S.A.F. in respect of the supply of spare parts, modification kits, repair and overhaul services, and engineering support.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what tactical nuclear weapon will be carried by the F111A.

I would refer the hon. Member to the Answer I have given today to a similar Question by the hon. Member for Dorset, North (Sir Richard Glyn).

Departmental Staff (Service Personnel)

77.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many service personnel are at present employed in his Department.

Dog-Handling Establishments

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what personnel are employed in his Department's dog-handling establishments; what is the total annual sum of their pay; and whether this sum was included in the figures for the annual cost of running dog-handling establishments which he has given.

The total number of personnel employed full time in Ministry of Defence dog-handling establishments is 2,497. Except for two members of the Admiralty Constabulary, who are employed as dog trainers, these personnel are at Army and Royal Air Force units, where they are specifically established to handle or look after dogs. The total annual cost of their pay and allowances, which was included in the figures I gave in reply to the hon. Member's Question on 18th February, is £1,970,000. The balance of £16,000 given in my Answer related to an assessment of the cost of the time spent by Admiralty Constabulary looking after dogs. The cost of maintaining all the dogs is additional to the figure given in my earlier Answer and is estimated at about £100 per dog per year on average, mainly for food.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he is satisfied with the cost effectiveness of the dog-handling establishments run by his Department; and if he will make a statement.

Police dogs and handlers play a vital part in guarding Service establishments both at home and abroad. Each dog and his handler is as effective as five men in this work. The saving by using dogs is, therefore, very considerable.

Baor (Nuclear Weapons)

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what tactical nuclear weapons are to be available for the British Army of the Rhine in the immediate future and in the 1970's; and whether he is satisfied that these will be adequate to protect British troops from attack by overwhelming conventional forces.

The British Army of the Rhine is equipped with the surface-to-surface guided weapon, Corporal, the free flight rocket, Honest John, and the 8-inch howitzer, all of which have a nuclear capability. Corporal, an obsolescent weapon system, is being withdrawn at the end of this year without replacement. Honest John and the 8-inch howitzer will continue in service into the 1970s.An attack by overwhelming conventional forces would be met by the combined forces of the N.A.T.O. Alliance.

Nato Infrastructure Depot

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he will situate the new North Atlantic Treaty Organisation infrastructure depot, mentioned in Command Paper No. 2902, at Londonderry; and whether he will make a statement.

No; this depot has already been built at Glen Douglas in Scotland.

Hms "Sea Eagle"

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has formulated to implement his policy of bringing alternative civilian employment to Londonderry following his decision to close H.M.S. "Sea Eagle"; and whether he will reconsider that decision.

The decision to move "Sea Eagle" stands. We have three years before it takes effect in which to find new jobs for Londonderry.

Neatishead Radar Station (Fire)

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the estimated cost of the equipment damaged and destroyed and the structural damage suffered in the fire at Neatishead Radar Station on 16th February.

The exact extent of the damage caused by the fire to buildings and equipment is being determined by the Royal Air Force Board of Inquiry. Until the findings of the Board are available, I am unable to give an estimate of the cost of the damage. However, preliminary enquiries show that the original investment in equipment and buildings was about one million pounds and extensive damage has been caused by the fire.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether, in view of the fact that the Royal Air Force Board of Inquiry into the fire at Neatishead Radar Station will be reporting on the fire precaution arrangements at the station, he will arrange for the Fire Brigades Union to be represented at the inquiry on behalf of the relatives of the firemen who lost their lives and those who were injured.

Royal Air Force Boards of Inquiry are domestic investigations conducted in accordance with statutory rules. Civilian witnesses may be represented by a lawyer when they are giving evidence. The Board may hear evidence from any persons who they think will help them in their inquiries and if the Fire Brigades Union wish to give evidence they should get in touch with the President of the Board of Inquiry.

Phantom, Hercules And F111 Aircraft (Cost)

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the total estimated cost, respectively, of the Phantom, Hercules and F.111 aircraft which the Government have ordered or announced a decision to order, since October, 1964; and how much approximately in each case is due to be paid before April, 1970.

For the 50 F.111 As which the Government have decided to order, the total costs of the aircraft including supporting equipment and initial spares, and our share of United States research and development costs is expected to be £150 million, of which about £20 million will be paid before April, 1970. The cost of the Hercules order will be about £70 million of which £20 million will be paid before 1970. No final decision has been taken on the exact size of orders for Phantom aircraft, but it is likely that the corresponding figures, on the same basis, will be £300 million and £160 million. The last figure reflects the fact that nearly half the Phantom content will be of British origin.

Commonwealth Relations

African Countries (Military Aid)

asked the Secretary of State for Commonwealth Relations what is the total cost annually of current military aid to Zambia and to other parts of Africa which are not mentioned in Tables 1, 3 and 5 of Annex H in Part II of the statement on the Defence Estimates.

I can only answer for Commonwealth countries in Africa.The most general form of military aid to Commonwealth countries in Africa is attributable to loan of military personnel to these countries for which the C.R.O. pays about half the cost and the receiving country pays the other half. In some cases also the C.R.O. pays for the tuition fees of the Commonwealth military students in the United Kingdom. The estimated cost to the United Kingdom of such loans and military training in Africa in 1965–66 is about £1·45 million.The only other form of military aid to an African Commonwealth country is £2·6 million to Kenya as part of the Independence settlement.

Cyprus

Constitution

78.

asked the Secretary of State for Commonwealth Relations if he will make a statement about Great Britain's continuing responsibility as co-guarantor of the constitution of Cyprus.

This responsibility derives from the Treaty of Guarantee (Cmnd. 1253), which was one of the Treaties comprising the 1960 Cyprus settlement. In Her Majesty's Government's view, these Treaties remain valid until altered by the mutual agreement of all the signatories.

Situation

79.

asked the Secretary of State for Commonwealth Relations whether he will make a statement on the present situation in Cyprus and the extension of the United Nations peace keeping force after the end of March.

Although the situation in Cyprus is at present relatively calm, little progress has been made towards a settlement of the dispute and the danger continues that armed conflict between the two sides may be renewed. As regards the extension of the United Nations peacekeeping force after the expiry of its current mandate on 26th March, I have nothing to add at present to the reply given by my hon. Friend on 14th February to the Member for Moray and Nairn.

Treaty Of Establishment

asked the Secretary of State for Commonwealth Relations if he will specify the nature of each of the treaties and understandings under which an obligation exists to consult and co-operate in the defence of Cyprus, as referred to in Chapter II, paragraph 3, of Part II of the Statement on the Defence Estimates.

The obligation referred to is that in Article 3 of the Treaty of Establishment (Cmnd. 1252). This article reads:

"The Republic of Cyprus, Greece, Turkey and the United Kingdom undertake to consult and co-operate in the common defence of Cyprus".
Under the Treaty of Guarantee (Cmnd. 1253) the United Kingdom also undertook to consult the other guaranteeing powers in the event of a breach in the provisions of the Treaty.

Malaysia

Defence And Mutual Assistance

asked the Secretary of State for Commonwealth Relations if he will specify the nature of each of the treaties under which an obligation exists to defend Malaysia, as referred to in Chapter II, paragraph 3, of Part II of the Statement on the Defence Estimates.

An Agreement on External Defence and Mutual Assistance was concluded between the Governments of the United Kingdom and the Federation of Malaya on 12th October, 1957 (Cmnd. 263). This was extended to all territories of Malaysia by Article VI of the Malaysia Agreement of 9th July, 1963 (Cmnd. 2094).

Malta

Defence And Mutual Assistance

asked the Secretary of State for Commonwealth Relations if he will specify the nature of the treaty or understanding under which an obligation exists to assist in the defence of Malta, as referred to in Chapter II, paragraph 3, of Part II of the statement on the Defence Estimates.

The British Government and the Government of Malta concluded an Agreement on Mutual Defence and Assistance in 1964. Under Article 2 of that Agreement each Government undertakes to afford to the other assistance for mutual defence and to consult together on the measures to be taken jointly or separately to ensure the fullest co-operation between them for that purpose.

Brunei

Defence Agreement, 1959

asked the Secretary of State for Commonwealth Relations if he will specify the nature of the treaty of understanding under which an obligation exists to protect Brunei, as referred to in Chapter II, paragraph 3, of Part II of the statement on the Defence Estimates.

Under the Brunei Agreement, 1959. Her Majesty's Government has responsibility for the protection and defence of Brunei.

Local Government

Town Centre Development (Basingstoke)

80.

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government when he will announce his decision regarding the compulsory purchase order necessary to enable the Basingstoke town centre development to go forward.

The Inspector's report reached my right hon. Friend last month. He expects to announce a decision very shortly.

Proposed Reservoir, Draycote

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government if he is aware of the inconvenience and hardship caused by the delay in announcing a decision of the public inquiry held last May on the proposed reservoir at Draycote, near Rugby, proposed by the Rugby and Southam Joint Water Board; and when a decision will be made.

My right hon. Friend is sorry he has not yet been able to announce a decision. He will do so as soon as he can.

Shop Windows (Advertising)

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government if he will take steps, by legislation or otherwise, to preserve amenities by limiting the extent to which shop windows are used for advertising matter.

Discussions on this matter are going on between the Department and representatives of local planning authorities and of the advertising industry.

Housing

Lower Interest Loans (Backdating)

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government which local authorities are to benefit by backdating of the lower interest loans on their housing programmes.

The number of English local authorities which will qualify for this special treatment will be very small.The full list is still being worked out. It will include the following authorities:—

RegionAuthority
NorthernGateshead C.B.
Hebburn U.D.
Jarrow B.
West Hartlepool C.B.
Yorkshire and HumbersideBradford C.B.
Halifax C.B.
Kingston-upon-Hull C.B.
Sheffield C.B.
North WestBlackburn C.B.
Liverpool C.B.
Manchester C.B.
Oldham C.B.
Rochdale C.B.
St. Helens C.B
Salford C.B.
Stockport C.B.
Warrington C.B.
West MidlandsBirmingham C.B.
Warley C.B.
East MidlandsNorthampton C.B.
LondonCamden L.B.
Greater London Council
Greenwich L.B.
Hackney L.B.
Hammersmith L.B
Islington L.B.
Kensington and Chelsea L.B.
Lambeth L.B.
Lewisham L.B.
Southwark L.B.
Tower Hamlets L.B.
Wandsworth L.B.
Westminster L.B.

Housing provided, under overspill arrangements, for the relief of congestion or overcrowding in the areas of these authorities will qualify for the concession, equally with housing provided by the authorities themselves.

Council Houses

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government if he will give the total number of council houses in Great Britain, showing the proportion that were built less than five years ago, between five and 10 years ago, between 10 and 15 years ago, between 15 and 20 years ago, and more than 20 years ago.

The information is as follows:—

LOCAL AUTHORITY AND NEW TOWN CORPORATION DWELLINGS GREAT BRITAIN
MillionsPer cent. of total stock
Built between 1st January, 1961 and 31st December, 1965·6613·5
Built between 1st January, 1956 and 31st December, 1960·7214·7
Built between 1st January, 1951 and 31st December, 19551·0220·8
Built between 1st January, 1946 and 31st December, 1950·6413·1
Built before 1st January, 1946 (estimated)1·8637·9
Total stock of dwellings (estimated)4·90100

Rent Assessment Panel (Kent)

asked the Minister of Housing and Local Government when the members of the rent assessment panels will be appointed for the county of Kent.

The work of selecting members for the Kent Rent Assessment Panel is now proceeding and my right hon. Friend expects the initial appointments to be made in the next few weeks.

Ministry Of Aviation

Lockheed C130 Aircraft

81.

asked the Minister of Aviation whether he will now publish the number of Lockheed C130 aircraft ordered for the Royal Air Force; when delivery will be completed; what is the agreed ceiling unit price for the basic aircraft; and what credit terms have been agreed.

Production orders have been placed with the United States for the first batch of C130 aircraft out of total buys of about 200 Phantoms and 66 C130s for delivery by the end of 1968. A formula has been agreed with the U.S. Government by which final unit costs of these aircraft will in each case be calculated on the basis of average unit costs of production of broadly comparable U.S. and U.K. aircraft. Costs of the U.K. purchases will be met by credit arrangements, the terms of which were announced by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence on 11th February, 1965.

Trs2 Contracts

asked the Minister of Aviation what was the cost of the development of the TSR2 up to its cancellation; and what were the cancellation charges paid.

Payments on all TSR2 contracts up to the time of cancellation amounted to £125 million. Since cancellation we have paid out a further £40 million for work done and cancellation charges in respect of severance, unrecovered overheads and the like. However, the final amounts are still the subject of negotiation between my Department and all the companies concerned and it may be some months yet before final settlement is reached.

Phantom Aircraft

asked the Minister of Aviation whether he will now publish the number of Phantom aircraft ordered for the Royal Air Force and the Fleet Air Arm; when delivery will be completed; what is the agreed ceiling unit price for the basic aircraft; and what credit terms have been agreed.

I would refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave him today in answer to a similar Question relating to Lockheed C130 aircraft.

Railways

Train Fire (Inquiry Evidence)

82.

asked the Minister of Transport how many passengers in- volved in the fire on the 08.07 train from Harpenden to St. Pancras on Wednesday 9th February gave evidence at the inquiry held on 24th February; and what arrangements were made to obtain evidence from such witnesses.

One. He volunteered to give evidence and was invited to do so. The Inspecting Officer is prepared to receive evidence from any other passenger who wishes to give it.

Passenger Services (Closures)

asked the Minister of Transport if she will list those railway passenger services proposed for closure in sections 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of Appendix II of the Report, the Reshaping of British Railways, and similar proposals made since the publication of the Report, on which the shortened procedure announced by the Minister on 4th November, 1964 has been applied, and where at the Minister's request the Board has agreed to defer publication.

The following is the information:PROPOSALS FOR CLOSURES OF RAIL PASSENGER SERVICES TO WHICH THE PROCEDURE FOR EXAMINATION BEFORE PUBLICATION UNDER SECTION 56 OF THE TRANSPORT ACT, 1962, HAS BEEN APPLIED.Bournemouth West station.Gateshead West station.Netherfield and Colwick—Nottingham Victoria.Tollerton station, Yorks.Cheltenham Spa Malvern Road—Cheltenham Spa St. James.Great Central Line.Yatton—Clevedon.Ipswich—Lowestoft.Saxmundham—Aldeburgh.Todd Lane Junction station, Lancs.Shelford—Marks Tey.

* Crewe—Derby.

* Preston—Barrow/Windermere, via Carnforth.

* Crewe—Carlisle.

Entwistle station, Lanes.

Gobowen—Oswestry.

‡Liverpool Exchange—Ormskirk—Preston.

Dereham—King's Lynn.

* Norwich—Dereham.

Glasgow St. Enoch station.

Tayport station, Fife.

Wrexham Central—Chester Northgate—New Brighton.

Kentish Town (St. Paul's Road Junction)—King's Cross (LT. 'C' Box).

‡* Liverpool Lime St.—Manchester Exchange.

* Wigan Wallgate—Rochdale.

Manchester Victoria—Accrington.

Manchester Victoria—Bacup.

Swinton Junction—Mexborough No. 1 Signal Box.

Mexborough No. 1 Signal Box—Mexborough No. 3 Signal Box.

Mexborough West Junction—Dearne Junction.

Rotherham Central station, Yorks.

Glasgow Buchanan St. station.

* Leeds Central—Bradford Exchange.

Maiden Newton—Bridport.

St. Erth—St. Ives.

Southampton—Fawley.

* Leeds City—Cudworth—Sheffield Midland.

Hessle Road Junction—Cottingham South Junction (Hull).

Liskeard—Looe.

* Leeds Central—Doncaster Central.

Alnmouth—Alnwick.

†* Newcastle—Alnmouth—Berwick.

* Newcastle—Hexham—Haltwhistle—Carlisle.

Stanley Junction—Forfar—Kinnaber Junction.

King's Lynn—Wisbech.

Perth Princes Street station.

* Cambridge—Ipswich.

Bodmin Road/Bodmin North—Padstow.

Northam station, Hants.

Southampton Terminus station, Hants.

Ferryhill station, Co. Durham.

‡Edinburgh—Hawick—Carlisle.

‡Kilmarnock—Ayr.

Coldham station, Cambs.

* Glasgow (Queen St.)—Edinburgh (Waverley).

Manea station, Cambs.

Stonea station, Cambs.

Ashford (Kent)—New Romney.

Norton Bridge station, Staffs.

South Aylesbury Halt, Bucks.

Hemingbrough station, Yorks.

Wressle station, Yorks.

Bogside station, Ayrshire.

Gailes Halt, Ayrshire.

Birmingham Snow Hill/Moor St.—Henley-in-Arden—Stratford-upon-Avon.

Birmingham Snow Hill—Priestfield—Wolverhampton Low Level.

Irk Valley Junction—Smedley Viaduct Junction.

Ardrossan Town station and line between Castlehill Junction and Parkhouse Junction.

Ardrossan Montgomerie Pier station and line between Stevenston Junction and Montgomerie Pier station.

Stranraer Harbour Junction—Stranraer Town.

Kingskettle station, Fife.

Springfield station, Fife.

‡Manchester—Hayfield/Macclesfield.

* London St. Pancras—Nottingham Midland.

Monkwearmouth station, Durham.

Cheadle Heath station, Lancs.

Bootle Junction—Edge Hill.

Bentley station, Suffolk.

‡Ibrox station, Glasgow.

Seaton Carew station, Durham.

Throsk station, Clackmannanshire.

Falkirk Camelon station, Stirlingshire.

‡Laurencekirk station, Kincardineshire.

Elliot Junction station, Angus.

Easthaven station, Angus.

West Ferry station, Angus.

‡Birkenhead Woodside—Rock Ferry.

‡Stanlow and Thornton—Helbsy with the closure of Birkenhead, Woodside, Bebbington and New Ferry, Spital, Ince and Elton, Helsby and Upton-by-Chester stations.

Upper Greenock station, Renfrewshire.

‡* Machynlleth—Pwllheli.

Manchester Central station.

‡Arkleston Junction—Renfrew Wharf.

‡Penarth—Cadoxton Junction.

‡Bridgend—Treherbert.

‡Lewes—Crowborough—Hurst Green.

‡Eridge—Tonbridge.

‡Manchester Piccadilly—Woodhead—Sheffield Victoria.

‡Ecclesfield West station, Yorks.

‡Wembley Station loop line.

‡Low Street station, Essex.

†Exeter—Okehampton.

†Exeter—Barnstaple.

‡Scarborough (Londesborough Road) station.

* Withdrawal of services from certain stations only.

†The Board have been asked to defer publication of these proposals.

In the case of the Newcastle—Berwick proposal this request only applies to Cramlington station.

‡The Minister's decision has not yet been given.

In all cases not otherwise noted the Minister has agreed to the Railways Board's request.

asked the Minister of Transport if she will give a list to date of the railway passenger services proposed for closure in sections 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Appendix II of the British Railways Board Report, The Reshaping of British Railways, and similar proposals made since the publication of the Report, indicating the latter in each case, which have been the subject of closure application by British Railways Board, showing the date of application in each case which has been the subject of hearings of objections by the transport users' consultative committees, showing the date of the last day of the hearing in each case, in respect of which hearings transport users' consultative committees have forwarded their report to the Minister of Transport, showing the date of which it was received in each case, to which consent was given, indicating the date on which the Board has withdrawn any services, and to which consent was refused, giving the date of the Minister's decision in each case.

PROPOSALS FOR CLOSURES OF RAILWAY PASSENGER SERVICES OF WHICH NOTICE WAS GIVEN UNDER SECTION 56 OF THE TRANSPORT ACT 1962 BETWEEN 1ST JUNE 1963 AND 25TH FEBRUARY 1966

Proposal

Date of publication

Date of last day of hearing

Date of report received by Minister

Date of decision

Date of withdrawal

Harrogate-Crossgates via Wetherby14.6.6320.8.639.9.6318.10.636.1.64
Church Fenton-Wetherby14.6.6320.8.639.9.6318.10.636.1.64
Selby-Goole14.6.633.9.632.10.6312.2.6415.6.64
Hull-Withernsea12.7.636.1.646.2.6431.7.6419.10.64
Hull-Hornsea12.7.632.12.6330.12.6331.7.6419.10.64
Leeds Central-Pudsey-Bradford Exchange11.7.634.11.632.12.631.4.6415.6.64
Wakefield-Goole23.8.6319.2.648.4.64
Leeds City-Knottingley23.8.6319.2.648.4.64
Bradford Exchange-Wakefield via Batley27.9.6310.3.648.4.6429.6.647.9.64
Leeds Central-Castleford-Pontefract
Leeds City/Bradford-Ilkley-Skipton6.12.6327.5.644.8.6410.9.64 Part deferred22.3.65
‡Leeds City-Shipley-Bradford Forster Square6.12.6327.5.644.8.6410.9.6422.3.65
‡Leeds City/Bradford Forster Square-Keighley-Skipton6.12.6327.5.644.8.6410.9.6422.3.65
York-Hull20.12.632.7.6410.9.643.8.6529.11.65
Selby-Driffield20.12.632.7.6410.9.6426.2.6514.6.65
Huddersfield-Clayton West/Penistone6.3.6410.9.6422.10.64
Bradford-Mirfield-Huddersfield13.3.6410.9.6422.10.6429.1.6514.6.65
‡Bradford-Halifax-Huddersfield13.3.6410.9.6422.10.6429.1.6514.6.65
Haigh Station, Yorks.21.8.6410.11.648.1.6521.7.6513.9.65
Crigglestone Station, Yorks.21.8.6410.11.648.1.6521.7.6513.9.65
Rosegrove-Todmorden21.8.648.12.6422.1.6528.7.651.11.65
Bolton Percy Station, Yorks.21.8.6410.11.648.1.6521.7.6513.9.65
Ferrybridge Station, Yorks.21.8.6410.11.648.1.6521.7.6513.9.65

*Ulleskelf Station, Yorks.

21.8.6410.11.648.1.6521.7.65—
Earby-Barnoldswick4.9.648.12.6422.1.6519.7.6527.9.65
Sherburn-in-Elmet Station, Yorks.21.8.6410.11.648.1.6521.7.6513.9.65
York-Harrogate23.9.642.3.6514.5.65
Harrogate-Northallerton23.9.642.3.6514.5.65
†Farnley Junction-Spen Valley via Heckmondwike24.10.64—12.3.6519.7.652.8.65
Bramley Station, Yorks.30.7.6510.11.6531.12.65
Great Central Line12.8.6522.10.652.12.65
Armley Moor Station, Yorks.30.7.6510.11.6531.12.65
Laisterdyke Station, Yorks.30.7.6510.11.6531.12.65
‡Leeds-Doncaster9.9.6512.1.66
‡Rotherham Central Station, Yorks.30.7.6510.11.6531.12.65
†Dearne Junction-Mexborough West30.7.6510.11.6531.12.65
†Swinton Junction-Mexborough No. 1 Signal Box30.7.6510.11.6531.12.65
†Mexborough No. 1 Signal Box-Mexborough No. 3 Signal Box30.7.6510.11.6531.12.65
Wivenhoe-Brightlingsea17.7.6317.9.6311.11.632.3.6415.6.64
Sheringham-Melton Constable16.8.6330.10.6314.12.6324.1.646.4.64
North Walsham-Mundesley-on-Sea16.8.6329.10.6312.12.6330.6.645.10.64
Dereham-Wells-next-the-Sea12.9.6315.11.6314.12.632.3.645.10.64
Swaffham-Thetford20.9.6326.11.639.1.6427.2.6415.6.64
Audley End-Bartlow20.9.6331.12.636.3.6421.5.647.9.64
Witham-Maldon East3.10.635.2.6418.3.646.8.647.9.64
Cambridge-St. Ives-March20.12.6324.3.6426.5.64
‡Oxford-Bletchley-Cambridge7.2.6421.7.6428.10.648.7.65

*Felixstowe Beach, Station

9.5.6425.8.6416.10.6429.12.64
‡Ipswich-Norwich26.6.6427.10.6417.2.65
‡Ely-Newmarket3.9.648.12.6414.1.659.7.6513.9.65
Ipswich-Lowestoft23.4.6528.9.6520.12.65
Saxmundham-Aldeburgh23.4.6528.9.6520.12.65
Shelford-Marks Tey23.4.6512.8.6527.10.65
†Dereham-King's Lynn21.5.659.11.6525.1.66
‡Norwich-Dereham21.5.65No hearing2.11.65
†King's Lynn-Wisbech East13.8.6511.1.66
‡Cambridge-Ipswich13.8.6514.12.65
†Coldham Station, Cambridge3.9.65—8.12.6531.12.65
†Manea Station, Cambridge24.9.658.3.66
†Stonea Station, Cambridge24.9.658.3.66
†Bentley Station, Suffolk4.2.65
Buckingham-Bletchley5.7.638.10.6311.11.6324.7.647.9.64

Proposal

Date of publication

Date of last day of hearing

Date of report received by Minister

Date of decision

Date of withdrawal

Derby Friargate-Nottingham Victoria8.7.6329.10.6319.12.6330.6.647.9.64
Northampton Castle-Peterborough12.7.6315.10.635.12.632.3.644.5.64
Northampton Castle-Wellingborough Midland Road12.7.6315.10.635.12.632.3.644.5.64
‡Cleethorpes-New Holland Pier19.7.6312.11.6321.1.64
Cleethorpes-Immingham Dock19.7.6312.11.6321.1.64
Barton-on-Humber-New Holland Town19.7.6312.11.6321.1.64
Lincoln Central-Woodhall-Firsby19.7.6326.11.6310.2.64
‡Banbury-Woodford Halse1.8.6310.12.6324.2.6411.5.6415.6.64
Castlethorpe Station, Bucks23.8.634.2.6414.4.6417.7.647.9.64
Roade Station, Bucks30.8.634.2.6414.4.6417.7.647.9.64
Wolverton-Newport Pagnell23.8.634.2.6414.4.6425.6.647.9.64
Leicester London Road-Burton-on-Trent27.9.6326.2.6427.4.6431.7.647.9.64
Nottingham Midland-Worksop14.11.6311.3.6422.6.644.9.6412.10.64
‡Didcot-Leamington Spa23.1.6414.4.6422.6.6417.8.642.11.64
‡Oxford-Stratford-upon-Avon24.1.6428.5.6421.8.6431.8.653.1.66
Worcester Shrub Hill
‡Stratford-upon-Avon-Honeybourne
‡Derby Midland-Sheffield Midland27.1.6410.6.645.12.64
‡Nottingham Midland-Sheffield Midland
Pye Bridge-Kirkby-in-Ashfield East21.7.656.9.65
Peterborough-Grimsby10.3.6415.9.6414.12.64
Firsby-Skegness10.3.6415.9.6414.12.64
Willoughby-Mablethorpe10.3.6415.9.6414.12.64
‡Lincoln Central-Barnetby10.4.6410.11.6411.2.6518.8.651.11.65
†Lincoln Central-Grantham10.4.6410.11.6411.2.6518.8.651.11.65
‡Leicester London Road-Wellingborough Midland Road24.9.6428.9.6528.10.65
‡Kettering-Nottingham via Melton Mowbray25.9.6417.2.652.6.6517.12.65
‡Kettering-Leicester via Melton Mowbray25.9.6417.2.652.6.6517.12.65
Rugby-Peterborough9.10.642.3.6522.7.6517.12.65
Seaton-Stamford9.10.6423.3.6522.7.6517.12.65
‡Leicester-Peterborough9.10.642.3.6522.7.6517.12.65
‡Derby Midland-Nottingham Midland12.10.644.5.659.8.6517.12.6514.2.66
†‡ Netherfield and Colwick-Nottingham Victoria20.1.6520.7.6521.8.65
†South Aylesbury Halt, Bucks30.12.65
†Killamarsh-Pyewipe Junction27.1.66
†Tuxford West Junction-Tuxford North Junction27.1.66
†Shirebrook Junction-Warsop Junction27.1.66
Kemble-Cirencester6.6.6313.9.6324.10.6313.1.646.4.64
Kemble-Tetbury
Taunton-Barnstaple17.6.6331.10.634.12.6310.9.64
Tiverton Junction-Tiverton17.6.6330.8.6324.10.6310.8.645.10.64
Bristol Temple Meads-Bath Green Park13.6.638.10.636.1.646.9.65
Bath Green Park-Bournemouth west18.10.6318.12.64
Highbridge-Evercreech Junction
‡Taunton-Exeter St. Davids17.6.6324.9.6324.10.6310.8.645.10.64
Taunton-Yeovil Pen Mill17.6.6325.9.6324.10.6327.2.6415.6.64
‡Bristol Temple Meads-Gloucester Eastgate1.8.6312.12.6324.2.647.9.644.1.65
‡Gloucester Eastgate-Worcester Shrub Hill
Berkeley Road-Lydney Town1.8.6312.12.6324.2.647.8.642.11.64
Puxton and Worle Station, Somerset14.8.63—1.1.6427.2.646.4.64
‡Taunton-Weston-super-Mare13.8.6321.11.631.1.6410.8.64 Part refusal5.10.64
Gloucester-Hereford8.8.6331.11.6418.3.6416.7.642.11.64
‡Plymouth-Penzance12.9.6319.2.6418.3.6430.7.645.10.64
Ford Station, Devon12.9.6319.2.6413.3.6418.6.647.9.64
Devonport (King's Road) Station, Plymouth
Lostwithiel-Fowey14.10.6320.2.6413.3.6410.9.644.1.65
Bristol Temple Meads-Portishead31.10.6319.3.6414.4.6416.7.647.9.64
‡Bath-Swindon18.12.638.5.6411.6.6410.9.644.1.65
‡Gloucester-Swindon20.12.639.4.647.5.6430.7.642.11.64
Halwill-Torrington14.11.632.9.6422.9.6429.12.641.3.65
Kingskerswell Station, Devon3.1.6429.5.6418.6.6431.7.645.10.64

Proposal

Date of publication

Date of last day of hearing

Date of report received by Minister

Date of decision

Date of withdrawal

‡Bristol T.M.-Avonmouth Dock21.12.631.5.6411.6.644.9.6423.11.64
‡Bristol T.M.-Patchway-Pilning
Severn Beach-Pilning
Brent Station Devon30.1.6429.5.6418.6.6431.7.645.10.64
Okehampton-Bude23.4.642.9.641.10.6422.12.65
Halwill-Wadebridge23.4.643.9.641.10.6422.12.65
Barnstaple Junction-Torrington16.7.645.11.641.12.6415.2.654.10.65
Tipton St. John's-Exmouth20.8.6425.2.658.4.6522.12.65
‡Salisbury-Exeter20.8.6425.3.655.7.656.9.65
Yeovil Junction-Yeovil Town20.8.6412.1.659.3.6531.8.65
Seaton Junction-Seaton20.8.6427.1.659.3.656.9.65
Okehampton-Bere Alston1.10.6426.4.6518.6.65
‡Bedwyn-Westbury27.8.645.4.6520.5.6517.12.6518.4.66
‡Patney and Chirton-Holt Junction27.8.645.4.6520.5.6517.12.6518.4.66
Yeovil Town-Yeovil Pen Mill20.8.6412.1.659.3.6531.8.6529.11.65
Chippenham-Calne27.8.6412.3.6513.5.6523.7.6520.9.65
Sidmouth Junction-Sidmouth20.8.6412.2.6524.3.6522.12.65
‡Chippenham-Westbury27.8.6412.3.6513.5.6517.12.65
‡Bristol T.M.-Bath-Weymouth25.8.649.12.6425.1.65
Callington-Gunnislake30.9.6426.4.6518.6.65
†Cheltenham Spa (Malvern Road)-Cheltenham Spa (St. James)17.3.6510.6.655.7.656.10.653.1.66
Yatton-Clevedon18.3.6515.10.651.11.65
St. Erth-St. Ives7.10.6515.3.66
Liskeard-Looe7.10.651.2.66
Bodmin Road North-Padstow21.10.6530.3.66
St. Margarets-Buntingford12.7.6310.10.6327.1.6410.9.6416.11.64
Harrow and Wealdstone-Belmont15.7.6312.12.6327.5.6410.8.645.10.64
Watford Junction-Croxley Green18.7.6331.10.6327.5.64
Croxley Green-Bushey and Oxhey20.2.6416.7.6414.12.64
Dunstable North-Hatfield25.7.6313.2.6423.9.6429.1.6526.4.65
West Drayton and Yiewsley-Staines West6.9.6328.11.6318.3.6410.9.6429.3.65
Three Bridges-Groombridge18.10.6316.6.6425.3.65

*‡East Brixton Station, London

3.1.6430.4.648.10.6423.6.65

*Romford-Upminster

28.8.6414.1.6528.5.6529.9.65
‡Kentish Town-Kings Cross27.5.6530.9.658.2.66
Crowhurst-Bexhill West8.6.6328.8.6316.10.6322.4.6415.6.64
Salisbury-Fordingbridge-Bournemouth28.6.6317.9.635.11.6327.2.644.5.64
Hurstbourne Station, Hants6.7.6330.10.631.1.6412.2.646.4.64
Brockenhurst-Ringwood-Bournemouth5.7.6317.9.6315.11.6327.2.644.5.64
Romsey-Andover2.8.6330.10.631.1.6421.7.647.9.64
Knowle Halt, Hants21.6.63—1.1.6412.2.646.4.64
Shoreham-by-Sea-Christ's Hospital30.8.6326.2.6416.6.656.9.65
Christ's Hospital-Guildford3.9.6310.3.648.6.641.3.6514.6.65
Eridge-Hailsham18.10.6321.5.6431.8.6426.2.6514.6.65
‡Didcot-Swindon3.10.6318.3.6423.4.6430.7.647.12.64
Ryde (Pier Head)-Cowes22.2.6410.6.6431.8.6423.7.6521.2.66
Shanklin-Ventnor22.2.6410.6.6431.8.6423.7.65

*Ryde (Pier Head)-Shanklin

22.2.6410.6.6431.8.6423.7.65—
†Folkestone East Station, Kent24.7.648.12.644.1.6514.5.656.9.65
Axminster-Lyme Regis20.8.644.11.644.1.656.9.6529.11.65
†Grove Ferry and Upstreet Station, Kent9.10.6410.2.6520.5.6518.8.653.1.66
†Boscombe Station, Hants.16.10.6427.4.6528.5.6518.8.654.10.65
†Bournemouth West Station8.1.6527.4.6525.5.6518.8.654.10.65
†Southampton-Fawley11.6.657.9.659.11.6522.12.6514.2.66
†Northam Station, Hants27.8.659.11.6510.1.66
†Southampton Terminus Station27.8.659.11.6510.1.66
Ashford-New Romney29.10.65
Maiden Newton-Bridport7.10.65
Nunthorpe-Guisborough14.6.6323.8.6312.9.6327.11.632.3.64

*Darlington-Bishop Auckland-Crook

19.7.6310.4.6425.5.6411.9.648.3.65 Part consent
Sunderland-Durham-Bishop Auckland19.7.6311.10.638.11.6328.2.644.5.64
‡Sunderland-West Hartlepool19.7.631.11.6326.11.6327.2.644.5.64
Monkseaton-Blyth-Newbiggin8.11.6319.3.6425.5.6430.7.642.11.64
Newcastle-Newbiggin
Newsham-Blyth
Darlington-Barnard Castle-Middleton-in-Teesdale6.12.6327.2.6414.4.6411.9.6430.11.64

*Newcastle-on-Tyne-Tynemouth via Riverside

17.1.6417.4.6425.5.6411.9.64

Proposal

Date of publication

Date of last day of hearing

Date of report received by Minister

Date of decision

Date of withdrawal

Sunder land-South Shields31.1.6411.5.642.7.6429.12.6414.6.65
Malton-Whitby14.2.648.7.6417.8.6411.9.648.3.65

*Middlesbrough-Whitby

14.2.648.7.6417.8.6411.9.64
Whitby-Scarborough14.2.648.7.6417.8.6411.9.648.3.65

*Darlington-Richmond

11.10.6316.1.645.3.6430.12.64
Brompton Station, Yorks.30.10.6419.3.6529.3.6522.7.656.9.65
†Gateshead (West) Station26.3.6516.7.6522.7.6519.8.651.11.65
Tollerton Station, Yorks.13.3.6516.7.6522.7.6519.8.651.11.65
‡Newcastle-Carlisle27.8.6514.12.6523.2.66
Ferryhill Station, Co. Durham22.11.6517.3.66
†Monkwearmouth Station, Co. Durham9.2.66
Trentham Station, Staffs.26.6.6315.10.6324.10.6315.1.642.3.64
Spon Lane Station, Staffs.25.6.6312.12.6320.12.6330.4.6415.6.64
Leek-Uttoxeter26.6.6329.10.6311.11.6331.8.644.1.65
‡Stoke-on-Trent-Silverdale (Stoke Loop Line)15.7.6314.11.6322.11.6313.1.642.3.64
‡Kidsgrove-Etruria26.6.6315.10.6324.10.6310.1.642.3.64
Normacot Station, Staffs.25.6.6315.10.6324.10.638.1.642.3.64
Walsall-Dudley2.8.6328.11.6316.12.6330.4.646.7.64
Birmingham-Dudley-Old Hill via Swan Village2.8.6328.11.6316.12.6330.4.6415.6.64
Worcester (Shrubs Hill)-Bromyard8.8.6316.1.6422.1.6411.5.647.9.64
†Ettingshall Road-Bilston7.8.6312.12.6320.12.6329.4.6415.6.64
Stafford-Wellington11.10.6313.2.6421.2.6427.5.647.9.64
‡Wellington-Shrewsbury
‡Birmingham (New Street)-Walsall via Penns15.10.6327.2.646.3.6410.9.6418.1.65
Wolverhampton (High Level)-Burton-on-Trent29.10.6312.3.643.4.6410.9.644.1.65

Nuneaton-Coventry-Leamington Spa Avenue

5.12.6324.3.646.5.6410.9.6418.1.65
‡Stourbridge Junction-Worcester-Hereford13.12.6316.4.6430.4.6431.12.645.4.65
Walsall-Rugeley Trent Valley10.1.6430.4.647.5.6410.9.6418.1.65

*‡Crewe-Shrewsbury

14.8.648.12.6421.12.6431.8.65
‡Derby-Tamworth-Birmingham9.9.647.10.6518.10.65

*‡Birmingham (New Street)-Worcester (Shrub Hill)

25.9.6416.3.6526.3.6528.7.65 Part consent

*Birmingham (New Street)-Redditch

25.9.6416.3.6526.3.6528.7.65 Part deferred
‡Birmingham (New Street)-Leicester- Nottingham2.10.6518.3.6510.8.65
4.11.6523.11.65
‡Crewe-Derby30.10.652.12.6516.12.65
Norton Bridge Station, Staffs11.12.65
Porth-Maerdy6.6.633.9.6323.9.6314.1.6415.6.64
Cardiff General-Clarence Road4.6.6328.8.6323.9.6314.1.6416.3.64
Barry-Bridgend5.6.632.9.6323.9.6314.1.6415.6.64

*Cardiff-Coryton

4.6.6328.8.6323.9.6314.1.64
Abercynon-Aberdare5.6.6329.8.6323.9.6314.1.6416.3.64
Carmarthen-Aberystwyth18.6.6325.9.6311.10.6311.9.6422.2.65
Caerphilly-Senghenydd5.6.6330.8.6323.9.6314.1.6415.6.64
‡Clarbeston Road-Fishguard Harbour (local)31.7.6322.10.6314.11.6312.2.64 Part refusal6.4.64
‡Swansea-Milford Haven31.7.6323.10.6314.11.6312.2.6415.6.64
Johnstone-Neyland31.7.6323.10.6314.11.6312.2.6415.6.64
‡Whitland-Pembroke Dock31.7.6322.10.6314.11.6312.2.64 Part refusal15.6.64
Bangor-Amlwch7.8.637.4.6428.4.6411.9.647.12.64
Ruabon-Barmouth18.10.6317.3.6428.4.6411.9.6418.1.65
Bala-Bala Junction
Rossett Station, Denbigh18.11.6317.3.6428.4.6411.9.6426.10.64

*Llandudno-Bl.Ffestiniog

7.12.6327.5.6412.6.6411.9.64 Part consent26.10.64
Bangor-Afon Wen27.12.638.4.6428.4.6411.9.64 Part refusal7.12.64

Proposal

Date of publication

Date of last day of hearing

Date of report received by Minister

Date of decision

Date of withdrawal

Whitchurch-Welshpool11.3.6424.6.6413.7.6411.9.6418.1.65
Llanfyllin-Llanymynech
‡Cheltenham-Swansea16.11.635.2.6421.2.6419.8.64 Part refusal2.11.64
20.3.6415.4.64
‡Shrewsbury-Aberystwyth15.5.6422.9.6423.10.6429.12.64 Part refusal14.6.65
‡Chester-Holyhead15.10.6417.3.6523.4.6519.11.65 Part refusal and part deferred14.2.66
Wrexham-Chester-New Brighton19.11.6524.2.66
†Oswestry-Gobowen25.8.6527.1.66
‡Craigendoran-Arrochar and Tarbet18.6.634.11.6321.12.6328.2.6415.6.64
Aberdeen-Fraserburgh18.6.6313.11.6331.12.6328.7.644.10.65
Fraserburgh-St. Combs18.6.6314.11.6329.11.6328.2.643.5.65

*Kilmarnock-Ayr

22.6.6331.10.6331.12.6328.2.64—
Langholm-Riddings Junction-Carlisle21.6.6318.10.637.11.6327.2.6415.6.64
Maud-Peterhead18.6.6314.11.6327.12.6328.7.643.5.65
Gleneagles-Comrie22.6.6326.11.6321.12.6325.5.646.7.64
Kilmarnock-Ardrossan22.6.631.11.6317.12.6328.2.646.4.64
‡Edinburgh-Berwick-upon-Tweed21.6.6323.10.6321.11.6327.2.644.5.64
Ayr-Dalmellington20.6.631.11.632.12.6327.2.646.4.64
‡Edinburgh (Waverley)-Dunbar21.6.6323.10.6321.11.6327.2.644.5.64
Kilmarnock-Darvel20.6.631.11.6317.12.6327.2.646.4.64
Elgin-Lossiemouth19.6.6314.11.6329.11.6327.2.646.4.64

Stirling-Alloa-Kinross-Perth

3.9.6329.1.644.3.6411.5.6415.6.64
Dumfries-Kirkcudbright7.9.6320.10.6425.11.649.2.653.5.65
†Edinburgh-Kingsknowe6.9.6331.1.6416.3.6425.5.646.7.64
Edinburgh-Musselburgh6.9.6331.1.6416.3.6415.7.647.9.64
Ballinlung-Aberfeldy7.9.631.4.6417.4.6411.8.643.5.65
‡Keith Junction-Elgin via Mulben3.9.6311.2.646.4.6411.9.641.12.64
Leven-Crail-Dundee4.9.6317.2.646.4.6411.2.656.9.65
‡Aberdeen-Inverurie6.9.6310.2.646.4.6411.9.647.12.64
Glasgow Queen Street-Kirkintilloch4.9.6324.1.6426.2.6415.7.64 Part refusal7.9.64
Banff-Tillynaught3.9.6310.2.646.4.6425.5.646.7.64
‡Glasgow-Dumfries-Carlisle4.9.6321.10.6425.11.649.8.65 Part refusal6.12.65
‡Aviemore-Inverness-Elgin26.11.6316.6.6413.7.6411.9.64 Part refusal3.5.65
Aviemore-Forres26.11.6316.6.6413.7.6423.3.6518.10.65
Aviemore-Craigellachie27.11.6317.6.6413.7.6411.9.64 Part deferred18.10.65

*Inverness-Wick/Thurso

27.11.6310.3.6423.3.6415.4.6429.11.65
29.7.64 Part consent

*Inverness-Kyle of Lochcalsh

27.11.639.3.6423.3.6415.4.6417.12.64
29.7.64 Part consent
Aberdeen-Ballater28.11.6323.9.6426.10.6431.8.6528.2.66
Lanark-Muirkirk28.11.6325.5.6410.6.6430.7.645.10.64
‡Glasgow Central-Carlisle28.11.6310.5.6413.7.6411.9.644.1.65
Dumfries-Stranraer28.11.6328.2.6423.3.6417.7.6414.6.65

* Ayr-Stranraer

28.11.6327.2.6423.3.6417.7.64 Part consent6.9.65
Killin-Killin Junction28.11.6317.11.6421.12.6421.7.651.11.65
Oban-Connel Ferry-Ballachulish28.11.637.10.6410.11.6421.2.66

*‡Fort William-Mallaig

28.11.6327.11.643.1.6526.7.65

*Edinburgh Princes Street-Glasgow Central

29.11.6316.9.6426.10.6429.12.641.2.65
6.7.656.9.65
31.8.65 Part consent
‡Edinburgh, Princes Street-Carstairs-Lanark29.11.6315.9.6426.10.6412.11.65
Hamilton-Strathaven-Coalburn29.11.634.11.644.12.6425.3.654.10.65
Coatbridge-Dumbarton29.11.6311.5.641.6.6423.7.645.10.64
Greenhill Station12.3.649.12.641.1.6522.12.65
‡Perth-Blair Atholl-Struan30.11.6317.4.644.5.6411.9.643.5.65
Glasgow-Stirling-Oban10.3.6418.11.6421.12.6421.7.651.11.65

*Glasgow-Paisley West-Elderslie

13.5.6416.2.6517.3.6522.12.65 Part consent14.2.66

Proposal

Date of publication

Date of last day of hearing

Date of report received by Minister

Date of decision

Date of withdrawal

Glasgow-Barrhead-Kilmarnock12.5.6410.2.6517.3.6522.12.65

*Glasgow-East Kilbride

12.5.643.3.659.4.6522.12.65
Glasgow-Dalry-Kilmarnock14.5.6425.1.6519.2.6522.12.65

*Glasgow-Kilmacolm and Greenock- Princes Pier

14.5.6417.2.6517 3.6522.12.65 Part consent14.2.66
Dundee West Station31.8.6414.12.6412.1.6517.2.653.5.65
Edinburgh, Princes Street Station5.2.6521.4.656.5.656.7.656.9.65
Newport East-Tayport7.7.6519.10.6515.11.6514.1.66
Glasgow, Buchanan Street Station29.7.6529.9.6527.10.6522.12.65
Glasgow St. Enoch Station30.6.6529.9.6527.10.6522.12.65
Perth, Princes Street Station10.8.653.11.6524.11.6527.1.6628.2.66
Stanley Junction-Kinnaber Junction (all stations shown in Annex, section 4, but line added later)18.8.6517.11.6523.12.65
Croy, Dullatur, Castlecary, Bonnybridge and Manuel Stations10.2.65
Bogside Station Ayrshire9.12.65
Gailes Halt Ayrshire
Stevenston Junction-Ardrossan Montgo-merie Pier31.12.65
Kingskettle and Springfield Stations31.12.65
Ardrossan Town Station with Castlehill Junction-Parkhouse Junction31.12.65
Elliot Junction, Easthaven and West Ferry Stations2.2.66
Falkirk Camelon2.2.66

*‡Carlisle-Hellifield (local)

5.7.6312.11.6311.12.6316.11.64

*Penrith-Workington

5.7.6326.9.6325.10.6310.1.66 Part consent
25.9.64
Carlisle-Silloth5.7.632.10.6325.10.6327.2.647.9.64
Mow Cop and Scholar Green Station, Cheshire25.6.639.10.6325.10.6323.7.647.9.64
Glazebrook-Stockport Tiviot Dale12.7.6321.1.649.3.6411.9.6430.11.64
Manchester Victoria-Newton Heath-Middleton12.7.636.12.6423.12.6323.7.64 Part deferred7.9.64
‡Manchester Exchange-Tyldesley-Wigan North Western12.7.6322.11.6323.12.6321.8.642.11.64
Southport Chapel Street-Preston10.7.6318.10.634.11.6313.5.647.9.64
Wigan Central-Glazebrook11.7.638.1.645.2.6423.7.642.11.64
Liverpool Central-Manchester Central (Widnes Loop)11.7.635.2.649.3.6413.8.643.10.64
St. Helens Shaw Street-Earlestown-Warrington Bank Quay20.9.635.2.649.3.644.3.6514.6.65

*Manchester Piccadilly-Buxton

7.11.6328.5.6418.6.6431.7.64
‡Blackpool North-Fleetwood28.11.6317.3.644.6.6410.9.642.11.64
Blackpool Central Station27.12.6317.3.6424.4.649.7.642.11.64
‡Liverpool Lime Street-St. Helens-Wigan North Western2.1.6430.6.6529.7.65
Wigan Wallgate-Fazakerley-Liverpool Exchange15.11.639.7.6529.7.65
Woodhead Station6.12.63No hearing24.4.6415.6.6427.7.64
Manchester Piccadilly-Hadfield/Glossop30.1.6420.10.6412.11.64

*Manchester Victoria-Bury Bolton Street

27.2.64No hearing15.12.648.2.65
18.6.6423.4.65
‡Manchester Central-Chinley-Derby Midland5.3.643.3.6526.3.65
Buxton-Millers Dale7.11.633.3.6526.3.65
Liverpool Central-Gateacre12.3.6423.9.6413.10.64
‡ Lancaster-Morecambe-Heysham11.3.641.7.6428.9.6431.8.653.1.66
Liverpool Lime Street-Chester General9.4.6419.11.648.12.64
‡Crewe-Chester General23.4.644.11.6410.12.6422.10.65
†Southport St. Lukes-Pool Hey Junction via Blowick27.6.64No hearing12.11.6420.1.6514.6.65
‡Stockport Edgeley-Stalybridge6.8.6428.1.6522.2.65
Ulverston-Lake Side (Windermere)18.9.6413.1.6527.1.6527.9.653.1.66

*Manchester Victoria-Oldham-Rochdale-Royton-Royton Junction

2.10.647.9.6528.9.65 Part consent Part deferred22.12.65

Proposal

Date of publication

Date of last day of hearing

Date of report received by Minister

Date of decision

Date of withdrawal

Manchester Victoria-Rochdale-Todmorden9.10.6420.5.6521.6.6527.9.653.1.66
‡Manchester Central-Chinley-Hope-Sheffield Midland1.10.6428.4.6526.5.65
18.5.65
Manchester Victoria-Horwich18.9.6414.12.644.1.6530.7.6527.9.65
‡ Liverpool Lime Street-Tyldesley-Patricroft-Manchester Exchange22.10.64
‡ Manchester Exchange-Huddersfield (local)2.10.643.5.65
Manchester Exchange-Stalybridge-Greenfield16.6.65
‡ Leeds (City)-Morecambe-Heysham2.10.6425.2.6526.3.6531.8.653.1.66
Manchester Victoria-Bury-Bacup-including Rochdale-Bacup30.10.6430.9.6520.10.65
‡Wigan Wallgate-Bolton-Bury-Rochdale30.10.6418.11.6531.12.65
Manchester Victoria-Bury-Accrington30.10.6421.10.6511.11.65
Todd Lane Junction Station, Lanes.6.8.6527.1.6616.2.66
Entwistle Station, Lanes6.8.659.12.6531.12.65

Proposals of which the Board gave notice but to which no objections were lodged:—

Newcastle-Washington

Exminster Station, Devon

Flax Bourton Station, Somerset

†Stalybridge-Micklehurst-Diggle

†Hessle Road Junction-Cottingham South Junction (Hull)

†Irk Valley Signal Box-Smedley Viaduct Signal Box

Stranraer Town-Stranraer Harbour Junction

Notes:

* Minister refused consent to closure.

† Added since publication of Reshaping Report.

‡ Withdrawal of services from certain stations.

Roads

A650 (Footbridge)

asked the Minister of Transport if she will take steps to construct a suspension footbridge on the A.650 over the river adjacent to Cottingley Bar Bridge in the urban district of Bingley, so that danger from further accidents, especially to the children attending schools in Bingley, can be obviated.

My right hon. Friend has decided that a footbridge should be provided here. Design and preparation work is being put in hand immediately, but it is likely to be at least 12 months before work can begin.

Accidents (Stepney)

asked the Minister of Transport how many people were killed or seriously injured in road accidents in the Metropolitan Borough of Stepney in each of the years 1955 to 1965; and whether she will give separate figures for children under the age of 11 years.

From 1st January, 1955, to 31st March, 1965, the fatal and serious injury accidents to adults and children in the Metropolitan Borough of Stepney were:

FatalSeriously injured
19557111
19565127
1957289
195814146
19598149
196013145
19618154
196216168
196312149
196411186
1st January to 31st March 1965234
981,468
The figures for children under 11 are readily available only from 1961 onwards. They are:—

FatalSeriously injured
1961—16
1962118
1963—15
1964—31
1st January to 31st March, 1965—4
184
After the 1st April 1965 the figures of accidents in the area of the former Metropolitan Borough of Stepney were included in those for the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, and cannot be readily extracted.

Expenditure

asked the Minister of Transport what has been the year-by-year expenditure on roads in Great

£ MILLION
New construction and major improvementsMaintenance and minor improvements
ExchequerLocal AuthorityTotalExchequerLocal AuthorityTotal
1945–46…….6.3.98.320.829.1
1946–47……1.31.22.518.722.941.6
1947–48……2.81.94.721.027.748.7
1948–49……2.72.65.317.527.244.7
1949–50……3.42.66.020.030.050.0
1950–51……3.72.66.318.930.249.1
1951–52……3.32.96.223.733.357.0
1952–53……3.72.66.325.834.760.5
1953–54……3.74.17.826.535.862.3
1954–55……4.34.79.029.538.668.1
1955–56……7.45.813.231.542.273.7
1956–57……15.07.022.031.944.276.1
1957–58……21.87.629.434.245.980.1
1958–59……47.110.357.432.847.580.3
1959–60……59.612.572.134.850.585.3
1960–61……57.917.275.136.653.490.0
1961–62……71.519.691.141.356.197.4
1962–63……94.821.9116.741.757.098.7
1963–64……119.931.2151.154.569.0123.5
* 1964–65……147.036.0183.053.572.0125.5
*Provisional.
The figures in the table are based on returns made by local authorities shortly after the end of each financial year. The returns indicate the value of roadworks done in the year. Because, in some cases, Exchequer payments to local authorities are made in advance of the work to
£ MILLION
New construction and major improvementsMaintenance and minor improvements
ExchequerLocal AuthorityTotalExchequerLocal AuthorityTotal
1965–70……1,100.0215.01,315.0325.0345.0670.0

Transport

70 Mph Speed Limit

asked the Minister of Transport what organisations have made protests against the 70 miles per hour speed limit; and if she will issue an interim report on the experiment so far.

I would refer my hon. Friend to the Answer given on 2nd February to the hon. Member for Richmond, Yorks (Mr. Kitson), and on 9th Britain since 1946 by central Government and by local government on major improvements and new construction, and on minor improvements and maintenance, respectively; and what expenditure is likely over the period 1965–70.

The following table gives the expenditure since 1946:—which they are appropriate, the figures given above for Exchequer expenditure are different from the figures given annually in the Appropriation Account for payments from the Exchequer.Expenditure over the period 1965–70 is likely to be:—February to my hon. Friend the Member for Meriden (Mr. Rowland), the right hon. Member for Berwick and East Lothian (Sir W. Anstruther-Gray) and the hon. Members for Leominster (Sir Clive Bossom), Westmorland (Mr. Jopling) and Gillingham (Mr. Burden).

Testing Stations

asked the Minister of Transport what progress is being made towards the establishing of Ministry of Transport testing centres, under the new regulations; and if she will make the city of Carlisle a centre.

Possible sites for testing stations are now being inspected. A station is planned for in or near Carlisle if a suitable site can be found.

Economic Affairs

Military Equipment (Imports From America)

83.

asked the First Secretary of State and Secretary of State for Economic Affairs what allowance for imports of military equipment from the United States of America was contained in the initial calculation of total imports in 1970 in the preparation of the National Plan; and to what extent it was necessary to adjust this in the light of the results of the industrial inquiry and other factors.

I would refer the hon. Member to the reply given to his previous Question on 24th February, by my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Secretary.

National Finance

Agriculture Bill (Money Resolution)

84.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he proposes to introduce the new money resolution for the Agriculture Bill.

The additional Money Resolution will be tabled as soon as it is ready and the date of its submission to the House for approval announced in the usual way.

Finance Act, 1965

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will issue interim guidance on those provisions of the Finance Act 1965 to which he intends to propose amendments in the 1966 Finance Bill.

Gross Fixed Capital Formation

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will give the proportion of total gross domestic fixed capital formation in Great Britain which has been going into the public sector in each of the last 10 years.

The division of total gross fixed capital formation between the public and private sectors for the years 1954 to 1964 inclusive is shown in Table 49 of the Blue Book "National Income and Expenditure, 1965". Figures for the year 1965 are not yet complete but estimates for the first three quarters of that year are given in Table 6 of the Monthly Digest of Statistics.

Consumer Price Index

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will give the percentage increase in the consumer price index for each year over the previous year for the years 1947 to 1965, inclusive.

I would refer the hon. Member to the Answer given to the hon. Member for Louth (Sir C. Osborne) on 25th February.

Income Tax (Child Allowances)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the estimated cost of the Income Tax child allowances for the year 1965–66; and what would have been the cost if allowances had been given for the first or only child exclusively.

Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

Annual Review (Cost Changes)

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what are the headings under which cost changes are considered at each annual review; and for which of these are increases to be taken into account at the current review.

Cost changes are usually grouped under the following headings: labour, rent and interest, machinery expenses, feedingstuffs, seeds, fertilisers, haulage and marketing, and miscellaneous. In the last 12 months there has been some increase under each heading.

British Wool Marketing Scheme (Report)

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he will publish the Report of the commissioner who presided at the public inquiry held on 20th September 1965 to consider objections to amendments to the British Wool Marketing Scheme proposed by the British Wool Marketing Board.

South Arabia

Unfederated States (Treaty Of Friendship And Protection)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies if she will specify the nature of the treaties and understandings under which an obligation exists to protect certain unfederated states in South Arabia, as referred to in Chapter II, Paragraph 3, of Part II of the Statement on the Defence Estimates.

There are Treaties of Friendship and Protection with the unfederated States of South Arabia which include undertakings by the British Government to protect the territories concerned and undertakings by the rulers not to enter into relations with foreign powers without the consent of the British Government. These Treaties would come to an end on independence.

Treaty Of Friendship And Protection

asked the Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies if she will specify the nature of the treaties and understandings under which an obligation exists to protect the Federation of South Arabia, as referred to in Chapter 11, Paragraph 3, of Part II of the Statement on the Defence Estimates.

The only obligation to protect the Federation is that contained in the Treaty of Friendship and Protection between the United Kingdom and the Federation of South Arabia concluded on 11th February, 1959 (Cmnd. 2451). There are also older Protectorate Treaties with all save two of the individual States, which are still in force, but only to the extent that they are not inconsistent with the 1959 Treaty. All these Treaties will come to an end at independence.

Education And Science

Married Women Teachers

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science how many qualified married women have returned to teaching, full-time and part-time, respectively, in each of the years 1961 to 1965.

The information is given in the table:

QUALIFIED WOMEN TEACHERS RETURNING TO SERVICE
Year ended 31st JanuaryFull-timePart-timeTotal
19622,7521,9104,662
19633,4072,1505,557
19643,2732,2345,507
19653,4352,9966,431
19663,4413,7847,225

Residential Colleges Of Education (Costs Per Student)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will state the average cost per student in the residential colleges of education, and the average cost per student in the day training colleges.

In the current academic year these estimated average costs per student borne on the funds of the colleges are £615 in residential colleges of education and £425 in day colleges. Because board and lodging is provided in residential colleges the maintenance grants paid to day students are higher than those paid to resident students. When account is taken of these grants the estimated average costs per student are £780 in residential colleges and £755 in day colleges.

Nursery Schools (Place Cost)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what is the estimated average cost per place in nursery classes maintained by local education authorities.

In 1963–64 the total average cost of a place in nursery schools maintained by local education authorities was about £130.

University Of Bradford (Draft Charter)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what progress is being made toward completion of the Charter for the technological University of Bradford; and what consideration is being given to representations from the students' union in framing its terms.

The draft charter for the proposed University of Bradford is under consideration by a committee of the Privy Council, of which my right hon. Friend is a member. Student representations are receiving most careful consideration.

Free School Dinners (Hull)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will give the number of children in Hull schools who are receiving free school meals or meals at reduced prices; and what percentage of these children have fathers who are regularly employed, in receipt of unemployment benefit, in receipt of National Assistance benefits and dead, respectively.

The latest return, which relates to a day in the autumn term 1965, shows that the number of children in Hull

Metropolitan Police DistrictCity of London
TotalUnder 1818 and Under 21TotalUnder 1818 and Under 21
Number of convictions…29,6961901,39820812

Fires In The Home (Female Deaths)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many women died during each of the last three years as a result of burns received in the home;(2) how many women who died during each of the last three years as a result of burns received in the home were over the age of 60 years;(3) how many women over 60 years of age who died during each of the last schools receiving free school dinners under the national arrangements for remission of the dinner charge was 4,134. The information requested in the second part of the Question is not available in the Department.

Home Department

Coroners Courts (Jurisdiction)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he is satisfied with the continuance of the present criminal jurisdiction of the coroners courts, in view of the fact that it can give rise to injustice; and if he will make a statement.

This matter comes within the terms of reference of the Committee on Death Certification and Coroners. Until that Committee has reported it would be premature to consider any changes.

Drunkenness (Convictions)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the number of convictions for drunkenness, and convictions for the age groups under 18 years and between 18 and 21 years, in the Metropolitan Police district, and in the City of London, respectively, during the calendar year 1965.

The provisional figures for the year 1965 are as follows:three years as a result of burns received in the home lost their life as a result of night attire catching fire;(4) if he will introduce legislation making the manufacutre of flameproof night attire for old women compulsory.

The only particulars available are given below. As regards regulations dealing with night-wear for the elderly, I have nothing to add to the statement I made on 27th January in reply to Questions by my hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle-upon-Tyne, East.

196319641965
Deaths of females from burns received in the home547455434
Deaths of females over the age of 60 from burns received in the home382274270
Deaths of females over the age of 60 as a result of their nightwear catching fireFigures not available39

Telephone Service

Kiosks, Belfast (Vandalism)

asked the Postmaster-General (1) how many public telephones and kiosks, respectively, have been wilfully damaged in Belfast during each of the past five years; and what has been the value of such damage;(2) how many public telephone cash boxes have been wilfully broken into in Belfast in each of the last five years; and what additional precautions he plans to prevent recurrences of this practice.

In 1965 the number of cases of wilful damage to kiosks was some 500, which is about twice that in 1964. This excludes minor incidents2C 10 cash-containers were stolen.Detailed information for earlier years and their cost is not readily available.Measures are in hand to strengthen the coin-boxes.

Ministry Of Power

Coal (Chemical Resources Research)

asked the Minister of Power if he is aware that in the United States of America oil companies are buying coal mines to exploit the extensive chemical resources available from coal; if he is satisfied that adequate funds are devoted to this particular field in this country to ensure the fullest possible research; and if he will make a statement.

Yes: I would refer my hon. Friend to the Answers I gave on 3rd December, 1965, to my hon. Friend the Member for Hemsworth (Mr. Beaney).

Area Electricity Boards (Initial Connection Charges)

asked the Minister of Power what total sum the area electricity boards recovered by way of initial charges for effecting connection of electricity supplies to new dwellings during the year 1964–65; and what percentage of total revenue from sales of electricity this amount represented.

I am informed by the Electricity Council that in 1964–65 area electricity boards received approximately £500,000 in respect of initial charges for connecting new dwellings, excluding charges for excess lengths of cable under Section 27(1) of the Schedule to the Electric Lighting (Clauses) Act, 1899, and contributions agreed for projects involving exceptionally heavy capital outlay. The amount represents 0·06 per cent. of total revenue from sales of electricity in 1964–65.

asked the Minister of Power what representations he has received from the Consumer Council in regard to the policy of the electricity supply industry in charging for connection of supplies to new dwellings; and what reply he has sent.

The Consumer Council informed my Department on 22nd March, 1965, that it was opposed to the giving of discriminatory discounts by electricity boards to induce builders to build "all-electric" houses, on the ground that these discounts encourage a limitation of consumer choice which cannot be justified on general economic grounds. The Council was informed that I was most anxious to bring about a settlement of the problem of free choice of fuels when housing estates were developed, and that it was being pursued on my behalf with the Chairmen of the Electricity and Gas Councils.

National Coal Board (Deficit)

asked the Minister of Power if he will give an estimate of the deficit which will be incurred by the National Coal Board in 1965–66.

I have no reason to disagree with the figures in the Report of the National Board for Prices and Incomes published on 24th February. This indicated an estimated gross deficit of about £58 million for 1965–66. Of this total, some £30 million will have been covered by the capital reconstruction under the Coal Industry Act, 1965. Moreover the balance of the deficit up to £25 million will be written off against the reserve created under capital reconstruction, as indicated in paragraph 9 of Command 2805.

South-East Asia (Peace Negotiations)

asked the Prime Minister, in view of his recent efforts to promote peace negotiations in South-East Asia, on what day and in what terms he communicated with the Prime Minister of the People's Republic of China to assure him of the good intentions of President Johnson in his desire for a settlement and end to the war in South-East Asia.

I made no direct communication to the Prime Minister of the People's Republic of China. Chinese denunciation not only of American but even of Russian efforts to promote peace had made it clear that there was no scope for a constructive exchange of messages with the Chinese Prime Minister.

Sterling (Reserves)

asked the Prime Minister why he did not inform Parliament that the run on sterling last April was so great that the reserves could have held out for only a few days longer; how much of the reserves were lost; how much remained; whose and what action ended the run, and so prevented devaluation; what steps he has taken to prevent this happening again; and if he will make a statement.

It is not the case that there was a run on sterling so great that the reserves could have held out for only a few days longer either last April or at any other time last year. As I pointed out in my speech to the Overseas Bankers Club on 7th February, that was what was mistakenly believed in some quarters in July and August. The figures of the reserves and the assistance taken month by month have been published in the Bank of England Bulletin, a copy of which is in the Library.

Vietnam

asked the Prime Minister what assurances he received from President Johnson in exchange for support in the Vietnam war; if he is satisfied that Great Britain gains advantage from this policy; and if he will make a statement.

None. Her Majesty's Government recognise the value of the United States help to South Vietnam and support their readiness to enter into negotiations which it is the aim of British policy to promote. The advantages to Britain and the whole world of achieving peace in Vietnam are self-evident.

Ministries (Division Of Responsibility)

asked the Prime Minister if he will define the divisions of responsibility between the Ministry of Land and Natural Resources and the Ministry of Housing and Local Government.

The general principle of the division is well expressed in the respective titles of the two Departments. If the hon. Member is in doubt over any particular aspect and will write to me about it, I will go into the details for him.

Scotland

House Purchasers (Local Authority Loan Schemes)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland which local authorities in Scotland have schemes for granting loans to house purchasers; which have had to suspend these schemes since October 1964; and for how long each of these suspensions lasted.

The following 110 Scottish local authorities have schemes for granting loans to house purchasers:

Town Councils (82)
AberdeenAlva
AbernethyAnnan
AirdrieBanff
AlloaBarrhead
BishopbriggsKilsyth
BlairgowrieKilwinning
Bo'nessKirkcaldy
Bonnyrigg and BasswadeKirkcudbright
Bridge of AllanKirkintilloch
BuckieKirkwall
CallanderLanark
Castle DouglasLangholm
ClydebankLerwick
CoatbridgeLoanhead
DalbeattieLochgilphead
DalkeithMilngavie
Denny and DunipaceMonifieth
DingwallMotherwell and Wishaw
DollarMusselburgh
DumbartonNairn
DunbarNewmilns and Greenholm
DunblaneNewport
DundeeNorth Berwick
East KilbridePaisley
EdinburghPerth
ElginPeterhead
ForfarPort Glasgow
Fort WilliamRothesay
FraserburghRutherglen
GalashielsSanquhar
GirvanStevenston
GlasgowStirling
GourockStonehaven
GrangemouthStranraer
GreenockStromness
HaddingtonThurso
HamiltonTillicoultry
HawickTroon
InvernessTurriff
IrvineWick
Johnstone
Kilmarnock
County Councils (28)
AberdeenKinross
AngusKirkcudbright
ArgyllLanark
BanffMidlothian
BerwickMoray
ButePerth
CaithnessRenfrew
ClackmannanRoss and Cromarty
DumfriesRoxburgh
DunbartonStirling
East LothianSutherland
FifeWest Lothian
InvernessWigtown
KincardineZetland
Since October, 1964, the following authorities have suspended their schemes:—Hamilton Town Council. Suspended in December 1964: resumed in March 1965.Glasgow Corporation. Suspended in April 1965: resumed in June 1965.Haddington Town Council. Suspended in September 1965: not yet resumed.Dumfries County Council. Suspended in December 1965: not yet resumed.

Housing Subsidy (£12 Basic Rate)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether he will give a list of the local authorities who qualified for only the £12 basic housing subsidy for houses built in 1965.

Claims by 130 local authorities for the basic subsidies under the Housing (Scotland) Act, 1962, have so far been settled for the financial year 1964–65. Of these, the following 43 authorities have qualified for the basic rate of £12 per house:

Counties
Banff.Nairn.
East Lothian.Sutherland.
Large Burghs
Inverness.
Small Burghs
Ardrossan.Leslie.
Banff.Leven.
Buckhaven.Linlithgow.
Burntisland.Loanhead.
Campbeltown.Lockerbie.
Cockenzie.Lossiemouth.
Coupar Angus.Macduff.
Cowdenbeath.Monifieth.
Cumnock.Nairn.
Cupar.Oban.
Dalkeith.Penicuik.
Fraserburgh.Portknockie.
Inverurie.Rosehearty.
Kilsyth.Rothesay.
Kilwinning.St. Andrews.
Kirkintilloch.Stornoway.
Kirriemuir.Tayport.
Largs.Turriff.
Lerwick.Wick.

Agricultural Houses

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many houses were built for agricultural purposes during each of the last 10 years; and by which local authorities they were built.

Twenty-one houses were completed by Scottish local authorities with the help of the special subsidies for agricultural workers during the last ten years, as in the table below. Other local authority houses which may be occupied by agricultural workers, but which do not qualify for the special subsidies, cannot be separately identified.1955–56—11 (Aberdeen County 3; Lanark County 8).1956–57—4 (Aberdeen County).1957–58—4 (Stirling County).1958–59—Nil.1959–60—2 (Roxburgh County).1960–61—Nil.1961–62—Nil.1962–63—Nil.1963–64—Nil.1964–65—Nil.

Heifers (Veterinary Surgeon's Certificate)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland why it is necessary in many cases for farmers to produce at their own expense a veterinary surgeon's certificate proving a dairy type heifer to be clean before his Department's graders will accept the animal for certification; and if he will make a statement.

Farmers are not required to produce a veterinary surgeon's certificate for this purpose but are free to do so if they dispute the grader's view that an animal is not clean (i.e. that it has been used for breeding) and they wish to submit other evidence for consideration in support of their claim. The hon. Member may wish to read the report of the adjournment debate on 3rd February, 1964 (HANSARD, cols. 938–948), where the considerations governing this aspect of the Fatstock Guarantee Scheme are set out in detail.

Houses (Additional Subsidy)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many houses have qualified for the additional grant for the use of local stone in each of the last three years; and which local authorities have built them.

In the last three financial years the numbers of houses on which additional subsidy has been paid under the Housing Acts in respect of measures taken, including the use of stone, to preserve the character of the surroundings are as follows:—

Financial year/Numbers of Houses
Local Authority1962–631963–641964–65
Cities
Glasgow48——
Counties
Midlothian12——
Renfrew—5—
Stirling404—
Large Burghs
Dumfries——50
Stirling——31
Small Burghs
Forfar——2
Galashiels35——
Fraserburgh——4
Peterhead——23
Thurso——9
1359119

Technology

Maddock Committee

asked the Minister of Technology why he did not inform the House of Commons of the setting up of the Maddock Committee.

It is not the practice to inform the House about working parties set up in the normal course of Departmental business.

asked the Minister of Technology if he will give the date on which the Maddock Committee was set up, its terms of reference, the names of its members, and the dates of its meetings.

I would refer the hon. Member to the Answer I gave today to the hon. Member for Cirencester and Tewkesbury (Mr. Ridley).

Fast Reactor (Prototype)

asked the Minister of Technology on what date he expects tenders to be invited for the construction of the prototype fast reactor and its fuel production plant.

This comes within the field of the Authority's management responsibility. The Authority informs me that there will be numerous individual contracts for civil engineering work and for plant and equipment for the two projects. Invitations to tender will be issued over several months, starting almost immediately.

Board Of Trade

Journal (Parliamentary Answers)

asked the President of the Board of Trade why, in the section Parliamentary Answers of the Board of Trade Journal of 16th February, the name of the Minister giving the answer is printed in 24 answers quoted, whereas the name of the questioner is never given; and whether in future he will print neither or both.

The present arrangements have been in force for many years. They are convenient and I see no reason to change them.

Advance Factories (Bellshill Industrial Estate)

asked the President of the Board of Trade when the two advance factories will be started in the Bellshill Industrial Estate; what will be the starting and finishing dates; what applications have been received for tenancy; and if he will make a statement.

Construction of the 40,000 sq. ft. and 12,500 sq. ft. advance factories on the Bellshill Estate commenced in November and December 1965 respectively. The smaller factory is expected to be completed by September and the larger by October. Details of both have been given to a number of enquirers but so far applications have not been received for either factory.

Pit Closures South Ayrshire (Alternative Employment)

asked the President of the Board of Trade what plans he now has for providing jobs for those who will be put out of work by forthcoming pit closures in South Ayrshire.

I understand that the National Coal Board will offer alternative employment within daily travelling distance of their homes to most of the men effected by colliery closures in South Ayrshire. An advance factory now being built at Cumnock has already been allocated and the Board of Trade are negotiating the purchase of another industrial site there. Negotiations are also in hand for a site for an advance factory at Girvan. I very much hope that these developments will provide ample employment for those miners who are unable to remain in the coal industry.

Industrial Development Certificates (Ayr And Prestwick)

asked the President of the Board of Trade how many applications for industrial development certificates have been received and granted in Ayr and Prestwick since this area was made a development district; and what is the total value of these proposed developments.

Insurance Premiums (South African Clients)

asked the President of the Board of Trade what information he has now obtained on the failure of South African clients to renew insurance premiums, since the embargo on payment of claims in Rhodesia.

Rhodesia (Insurance Claims)

asked the President of the Board of Trade if he will give an estimate of the total amount of claims accepted by British insurance companies which cannot at present be remitted to Rhodesia because of the embargo on the sending of funds to Rhodesia.

I understand that there are very few such claims, but it is not possible to estimate the amount involved.