Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 934: debated on Wednesday 6 July 1977

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Wednesday 6th July 1977

Industry

Industrial Development Certificates

asked the Secretary of State for Industry (1) how many applications for industrial development certificates were withdrawn in the United Kingdom in each of the past three years;(2) how many applications for industrial development certificates were refused in England in each of the past three years;(3) how many applications for industrial development certificates were granted in the United Kingdom in each of the past six years.

The table below shows the number of industrial development certificates granted and refused for the years 1971–76, and for the first five months of this year, for schemes of 15,000 sq. ft. and over in Great Britain. The control does not operate in Northern Ireland.

YearGrantedRefused
19711,25455
19721,49041
19731,77273
19741,24657
197586016
19761,0625
1977 (January-May)4824
The number of industrial development certificates refused in England in each of the above years is the same as the number refused in Great Britain.Statistics are not available in respect of applications withdrawn.Since July 1972, IDCs have not been required in the development and special development areas. Following the design designation of the Edinburgh and Cardiff areas in August 1974, the IDC control ceased to apply in those areas.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many applications for industrial development certificates were refused for the Leek parliamentary constituency in each of the past six years.

Statistics for industrial development certificates are not available in respect of parliamentary constituencies. In the employment office areas of Biddulph, Cheadle, Leek and Kidsgrove, which approximate to the parliamentary constituency of Leek, no industrial development certificates have been refused during the past six years.

asked the Secretary of Stale for Industry how many applications for industrial development certificates were refused in the Bristol area over the last six years; and if he will list them.

Only three applications for industrial development certificates have been refused in the Bristol area since 1971—one in each of the years 1971, 1975 and 1976. Applications for industrial development certificates are normally made to the Department in confidence, and information concerning the applications, including the applicants' names, cannot be disclosed.

British Steel Corporation

asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he will give a general direction to the British Steel Corporation not to seek political references on potential employees.

Government Aid

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many applications have been received under the clothing industry scheme; what is the total amount of assistance offered since the commencement of the scheme; and how many applications have been rejected.

By 24th June 1977, 346 applications for assistance had been received; £2,117,000 had been offered towards the costs of approved projects; and 45 applications had been rejected.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many applications have been received under the poultrymeat processing scheme; what is the total amount of assistance offered since the commencement of the scheme; and how many applications have been rejected.

124 applications have been received under the poultrymeat processing scheme. The total amount of assistance offered since the commencement of the scheme is £2,597,306 and the number of applications rejected is four.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many applications have been received under the textile machinery industry scheme; what is the total amount of assistance offered since the commencement of the scheme; and how many applications have been rejected.

21 applications have been received under the textile machinery industry scheme, of which two have been withdrawn or rejected. The total amount of assistance offered to date is £47,000.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many applications have been received under the paper and board industry scheme; what is the total amount of assistance offered since the commencement of the scheme; and how many applications have been rejected.

By 4th July, 43 applications had been received. Assistance totalling £5·56 million has been offered since the commencement of the scheme. Two applications have been rejected.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many applications have been received under the printing machinery industry scheme; what is the total amount of assistance offered since the commencement of the scheme; and how many applications have been rejected.

23 applications have been received under the printing machinery industry scheme, of which three have been withdrawn or rejected. The total amount of assistance offered to date is £677,000.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many applications have been received under the machine tool industry scheme; what is the total amount of assistance offered since the commencement of the scheme; and how many applications have been rejected.

226 applications have been received under the machine tool industry scheme, of which 19 have been withdrawn or rejected. The total amount of assistance offered to date is £6,224,000

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many applications have been received under the ferrous foundry industry scheme; what is the total amount of assistance offered since the commencement of the scheme; and how many applications have been rejected.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many applications have been received under the non-ferrous foundry industry scheme; what is the total amount of assistance offered since the commencement of the scheme; and how many applications have been rejected.

52 applications have been received to date since this scheme was announced on 24th January. Applications are being processed and no offers of assistance have yet been made. Five applications have been rejected as being ineligible under the terms of the scheme.

Steelworks (Closures)

asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he has any plans for replacing the jobs being lost by the intended closure of the British Steel Corporation plant at Greenwich.

pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 5th July 1977; Vol. 934, c. 483], gave the following information:The Manpower Services Agency will do everything possible to help those made redundant. Qualifying firms in Greenwich stand to benefit from the various schemes of assistance to promote investment in individual industries as well as from the selective investment scheme. Schemes to be assisted under the policies for inner cities outlined in Cmnd. 6845 may also provide jobs for the people concerned.

Scotland

Arbroath Infirmary

20.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if, in response to the continuing widespread opposition in South Angus to the Tayside Health Board's proposals to alter the status and function of Arbroath Infirmary, he will make a statement on his reasons for agreeing to these Tayside Health Board proposals.

Before agreeing in principle with Tayside Health Board's ultimate aim to withdraw specialist in-patient services from Arbroath Infirmary, my right hon. Friend took account of all the representations which have been made. The over-riding consideration is that specialist in-patient services should be provided in hospitals where a full range of trained staff and supporting services for the basic specialties and 24-hour cover by doctors are available. The investment of resources on this scale cannot be justified in hospitals of the size of Arbroath Infirmary.

Scottish Assembly

21.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what has been spent so far on adapting the Royal High School for an Assembly; and how much further expenditure is planned in the present financial year.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what the total expenditure is, to the latest available date, on the conversion of the Royal High School in Edinburgh to other purposes.

Expenditure to mid-June is £1·087 million including £0·65 million for purchase. Expenditure planned for the present financial year is the balance of the estimate of the total cost of £2 million which was announced in the reply to my hon. Friend the

AVERAGE UNREBATED RENT (£ PER ANNUM) OF COUNCIL HOUSES IN SCOTLAND
Adjusted by percentage change in average earnings in manufacturing industry
DateRentSeptember 1976April 1977
28th November 197074175186
28th November 1974138186197
30th September 1976180180191
The average unrebated rent at April 1977 was estimated to be at least £190.

Crofters Commission

24.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he intends to fill the vacancies on the Crofters Commission; and whether he will consider appointing two women.

My right hon. Friend is satisfied that the present mem- Member for Kirkcaldy (Mr. Gourlay) on 7th April.—[Vol. 929; c. 653–4.]

Aberdeen

23.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what representations he has had regarding the downgrading of Aberdeen's development area status.

Representations have been received from a number of sources, including some hon. Members, local authorities, and from industry in the area.

Rents

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) what the average rent of council houses in Scotland would now be if the average figures for 1970 and 1974 respectively, had been increased in an equivalent percentage to the increase in average industrial earnings over the period concerned;(2) what was the average rent of council houses in Scotland in 1970 and 1974, respectively, and at the latest convenient date.

The information is as follows:bership of seven is sufficient to enable the Commission to carry out its functions. It will continue to be his practice to consider the appointment of women members when vacancies occur.

Herring Fishing

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what discussions he has had with, and what representations he has had from, the Dutch authorities regarding the North Sea herring ban.

None, other than the discussions which took place at the relevant meetings of the Council of Ministers.

Transport Services (Orkney And Shetland)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how much of the grants paid for transport services in Orkney and Shetland in 1976–77 were in respect of capital projects.

The breakdown of expenditure on transport services for Orkney and Shetland in 1976–77 in terms of capital and revenue accounts was as follows:

£000
CapitalRevenue
Sea, including improvements to piers and harbours1,159323
Air272119

Crime

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland in view of the concern, particularly in Strathclyde Region, about the rise in crime and the serious shortage of police, what steps he will take to remedy the situation.

I share the concern about the present level of crime in Scotland, and in Strathclyde in particular. I understand that Strathclyde Regional Council and the Chief Constable are considering together whether improvements can be made in police cover.

Housing Expenditure

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what net increase in

SUPPORT FOR BUS SERVICES IN SCOTLAND
£ million at outturn prices
1972–731973–741974–751975–761976–77
Local Authority Revenue Support Payments*0·72·64·38·48·2
Fuel Duty Rebate3·03·34·45·35·8
New Bus Grant1·72·92·93·96·5
* Includes payments to local authorities' own undertakings and to the Greater Glasgow Passenger Transport Executive.
The Government's proposals for the future are set out in the White Paper on

public expenditure on housing he expects, from that forecast in the most recent Public Expenditure Survey Committee forecast, as a result of the changes outlined in the Green Paper on Housing Policy in Scotland.

The Green Paper has been published as a basis for discussion with the many interests concerned. Whether there will be any significant effect on public expenditure on housing depends on decisions yet to be taken.

Police

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what represetations he has had from the Strathclyde Regional Council about the shortage of police; and if he will make a statement.

Capital And Corporal Punishment

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will seek powers to hold a referendum on the reintroduc-tion of capital and corporal punishment; and if he will make a statement.

Buses

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how much public money has been made available for public bus services in Scotland in each of the last five years to the latest available date; and if he will make a statement.

The following is the information:Transport Policy presented to Parliament on 27th June.

Trade Unions

asked the Prime Minister (1) if, pursuant to his answer, Official Report, 30th June column 541, that a man should be free within limits not to join a trade union, if he will define the limits;(2) if, pursuant to his reply,

Official Report, 30th June, column 540, that until it was proved to the contrary that there was every reason to believe that people at Grunwick had been dismissed for membership of trades unions, he will state the reasons for his belief.

Northern Ireland

Drugs (Costs)

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what was the value of drugs prescribed under the National Health Service by chemists in Northern Ireland for the past three years.

pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 5th July 1977] gave the following information:The estimated ingredient cost of drugs dispensed by chemists in Northern Ireland in the last three years is:

£ million
19748·7
197511
197614·4
These figures do not include the cost of dressings or appliances, allowances for containers, or dispensing fees, profits or allowances for overhead expenses.

Prices And Consumer Protection

Lamps

asked the Secretary of State for Prices and Consumer Protection if, in view of the fact that British lamp manufacturers have adopted undesirably low standards of durability and reliability for their products, as illustrated in an article entitled "Throwing light on planned obsolescence" in the New Scientist on 2nd June 1977, he will refer to the Director-General of Fair Trading the matter of the quality and reliability of British-made lamps.

I am unable to accept that British manufacturers of discharge lamps have adopted undesirably low standards of durability and reliability for their products.

Price Control

asked the Secretary of State for Prices and Consumer Protection whether he will make a further statement on price control, setting out the reasons why he now expects success with the policy.

My right hon. Friend's views were set out at length during the Report stage and Third Reading debates on the Price Commission Bill. There is nothing further to add at this stage.

Trade

Whisky

asked the Secretary of State for Trade if he will list in the Official Report the exports of Scotch whisky to Australia, by value and volume, and by bottle and bulk, for each of the last five years.

Exports of Scotch and Northern Irish whisky—which are not shown separately in the overseas trade statistics—to Australia were as follows:

BulkBottled
Thousand proof gallons£ million f o bThousand proof gallons£ million f o b
19721,3163·54281·5
19731,8194·54391·7
19741,8185·64942·2
19751,8296·84942·5
19762,0216·93562·4

Insurance (Long-Term Policies)

asked the Secretary of State for Trade what policy he is adopting in considering applications from insurers under Section 68(4) of the Insurance Companies Act 1974 for alteration of the requirements of regulations governing long-term policies.

The purpose of the Insurance Companies (Linked Properties and Indices) Regulations 1975 (S.I. 1975 No. 929) is to safeguard the interests of the policyholder by ensuring that benefits under linked long-term insurance policies may only be determined by reference to the value of suitable assets or to suitable indices of asset values. This is also my overriding concern in considering dispensations from these Regulations under Section 68(4).The regulations restrict the assets and indices of asset values by reference to which benefits under linked long-term policies may be determined to a list that follows closely the suggestions made in paragraph 137 of the Report of the Committee on Property Bonds and Equity-Linked Life Assurance chaired by Sir Hilary Scott (Cmnd. 5281). In the light of events since the Scott Committee reported in 1973, I am adopting a cautious line in considering future requests from insurers for dispensations under Section 68(4).I will be guided by the following principles, which are to be read together: (i) I should not permit benefits to be linked to any asset not already permitted under the regulations that is not a permitted investment for a unit trust authorised in Great Britain—in other words, not a security within the meaning of Section 26 of the Prevention of Fraud (Investments) Act 1958.(ii) As for unquoted securities, in which authorised unit trusts are permitted to invest a limited proportion of their assets, I do not consider it appropriate for me to attempt to identify those which are acceptable as assets to which benefits may be linked in the way suggested in paragraph 137 of the Scott Committee report. I do not, therefore, propose to use my powers under Section 68(4) to permit benefits under policies to be linked to securities for which there is no quotation on a recognised stock exchange, unless the security is simply a vehicle for investing in permitted assets.(iii) In the case of all other applications for the linking of benefits to non-permitted assets, including applications in respect of unquoted securities that are simply a vehicle for investing in permitted assets, I shall only be prepared to exercise my powers under Section 68(4) where I can readily be satisfied that the proposal is likely to be advantageous to prospective policyholders and not detrimental to other sections of the public, and that the following criteria are met: (a) that a generally acceptable and reasonably reliable market value for the property can be obtained; (b) in the case of types of property for which there is no continuously available market price, that there is a professional body whose members are qualified to act as independent valuers for that property; (c) that the market in the property is not too narrow or specialised; and (d) that the proposal does not increase the chance of loss to the policyholder through fraud or conflict of interest.In a few cases benefits under existing schemes are already, with my consent, linked to the value of assets not permitted under the regulations. I am considering whether these schemes meet the criteria in paragraph 2 above; if not, I shall be prepared to consider transitional arrangements.

Developing Countries

asked the Secretary of State for Trade what steps his department is taking to combat the recent substantial loss of trade with the non-oil producing developing world.

pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 4th July 1977; Vol. 934, c. 440], gave the following information:We are currently examining how we can increase our exports to developing countries.

Social Services

National Health Service (Administration)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people are presently employed in the administration of the National Health Service; and what were the comparable figures in each of the past nine years.

I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Hor-sham and Crawley (Mr. Hordern) on 24th March.—[Vol. 928, c. 655–9.] I regret that, because of collection and validation difficulties, figures for 1976 are not yet available. For years before 1971, a comparable series cannot be constructed because of the reclassification as administrative and clerical of some staff formerly allocated to other staff groups and because comprehensive statistics are not available for England alone on administrative and clerical staff of former local health authorities.

Supplementary Benefits Commission Reception And Re-Establishment Centres

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many persons have attended a Supplementary Benefits Commission reception centre more than once in each of the last four years; and what are the criteria for re-visits.

Information about the number of repeat admissions to reception centres is not available, but the criteria for a person's readmission are the same as for his or her initial admission

WAITING TIMES—SEPTEMBER 1976
Region by Area Health AuthorityTotal numbers of all casesPercentage of urgent cases waiting more than one monthPercentage of non-urgent cases waiting more than one yearMean waiting time in weeks for cases discharged in 1974*
Northern
Cleveland513317
Cumbria50
Durham19
Northumberland2810037
Gateshead4
Newcastle4212
North Tyneside14100
South Tyneside2
Sunderland
Regional Total21075122·4
Yorkshire
Humberside24
North Yorkshire4
Bradford27
Calderdale12
Kirklees28
Leeds4625
Wakefield59
Regional Total200232·1
Trent
Derbyshire2724
Leicestershire2160100
Lincolnshire4213
Nottinghamshire13861
Barnsley5915
Doncaster
Rotherham
Sheffield1136
Regional Total29853112·0
East Anglia
Cambridgeshire14
Norfolk7123
Suffolk10710
Regional Total192153·1
North West Thames
Bedfordshire14416
Hertfordshire1884425
Barnet4138
Brent/Harrow2
Ealing/Hammersmith/Hounslow10
Hillingdon30
Kensington/Chelsea/Westminster39
Regional Total45427165·6

namely, being without a settled way of living and requiring temporary board and lodging.

Geriatrics

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will provide figures to show the number of elderly people awaiting admission to a hospital bed or in need of geriatric accommodation in each health authority area; and if he will indicate the average waiting time in each case.

Following are the figures for patients waiting for admission to geriatric departments in hospitals:

Region by Area Health Authority

Total numbers of all cases

Percentage of urgent cases waiting more than one month

Percentage of non-urgent cases waiting more than one year

Mean waiting time in weeks for cases discharged in 1974*

North East Thames

Essex10754
Barking/Havering6541
Camden/Islington18
City and East London2
Enfield and Haringey5
Redbridge and Waltham Forest16
Regional Total213442·6

South East Thames

Lambeth/Southwark/Lewisham2626
Greenwich and Bexley5513
Kent113152
East Sussex425
Bromley3
Regional Total2391391·4

South West Thames

Surrey113208
West Sussex47
Croydon2124
Kingston and Richmond6
Merton/Sutton/Wandsworth1355
Regional Total3221753·2

Wessex

Dorset13751
Hampshire145152
Wiltshire22
Isle of Wight16
Regional Total3204413·2

Oxford

Berkshire25
Buckinghamshire1331
Northamptonshire10
Oxfordshire
Regional Total

48

92·1

South Western

Avon577921
Cornwall617015
Devon158
Gloucestershire34
Somerset18
Regional Total3287354·0

West Midlands

Hereford and Worcester7520
Salop22239
Staffordshire4023537
Warwickshire895533
Birmingham32
Coventry388
Dudley39
Sandwell337932
Solihull
Walsall16
Wolverhampton5
Regional Total95144302·6

Mersey

Sefton7128
Wirral578
Cheshire7517
Liverpool565
St. Helens and Knowsley17
Regional Total2762593·1

Region by Area Health Authority

Total numbers of all cases

Percentage of urgent cases waiting more than one month

Percentage of non-urgent cases waiting more than one year

Mean waiting time in weeks for cases discharged in 1974*

North Western

Lancashire171263
Bolton41
Bury
Manchester89752
Oldham
Rochdale
Salford4934
Stockport44603
Tameside3
Trafford13
Wigan21
Regional Total4314123·8

* Source: Hospital In-patient Enquiry (the only source of mean waiting times) contains figures for mean waiting times at national and regional levels only.

Data on waiting time for those currently waiting for admission are limited to the number and percentage of urgent cases waiting more than one month and the number and percentage of non-urgent cases waiting more than one year. Figures are available for the mean waiting time for admission for cases discharged in 1974.
A dash in any position ndicates that there are no cases in that category or, for percentages, that the figure is less than 0·5.

Doctor-Patient Ratio (Leek)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he remains satisfied with the doctor-patient ratio in the Leek parliamentary constituency; and how it compares with the res; of the United Kingdom.

Information is not available in the form requested for the Leek parliamentary constituency. Relevant figures about the number of doctors providing services in the National Health Service are as follows:

Hospital doctors per 100,000Doctors providing the full range of general medical services per 100,000
Staffordshire Area Health Authority (includes Leek Parliamentary Constitu ency)*38
England and Wales59 (64)†44
* Figures for hospital medical staff are not held centrally for non-teaching areas.
† Whole time equivalent (with actual number given in brackets) at 30th September 1976.
We are not satisfied with these disparities and the Government remains committed to reducing inequalities in the distribution of medical staff across the country.

Disabled Persons (Vehicles)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when he expects to make an announcement authorising those who have been provided with an invalid car since 1976 to surrender the vehicle and secure a private car allowance.

There are three categories. Those whose tricycle was supplied under the rules of the old scheme, which ended at the beginning of 1976, are already free to switch to a private car allowance under those rules. They will also be able to switch to the mobility allowance under regulations which will be laid before the House shortly. Those who were found eligible for mobility allowance under the new scheme but chose to have a tricycle instead can switch to the mobility allowance—but not to a private car allowance —at any time. Those whose tricycle was provided under the new scheme transitional arrangement for giving tricycles to people in age groups not yet able to claim the mobility allowance can switch to cash only by claiming mobility allowance once their age group has been phased into the scheme.

Hospitals (Medical Equipment)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will state the items of medical equipment which are in shortest supply in NHS hospitals; where the most severe shortages are; and what is the estimated cost of meeting the shortages.

Health authorities decide their own priorities and the items of medical equipment to be purchased having regard to their other commitments and the funds available. If the hon. Member has any particular item of equipment in mind and will let me know, I will look into it.

National Health Service (Expenditure)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what steps he is taking to encourage cost-consciousness throughout the National Health Service; and if he will make a statement.

My right hon. Friend and I attach the utmost importance to the most effective use of resources in the National Health Service and to the need to concentrate resources on direct patient care. Among our immediate objectives are the more effective use of the domestic, laundry, catering and purchasing activities, a reduction in the amount of expenditure on sales promotion which pharmaceutical companies can charge to the National Health Service, and savings in management costs. Like other areas of public expenditure, most of the National Health Service has had to discipline itself to live within cash limits, and in 1976–77 health authority current spending was within ½ per cent. of the revenue cash limit of £3,500 million.

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, of the £863,944 spent in the financial year 1975–76 on domestic and other general services in National Health Service hospitals in England, how much was attributable to the hospitals' own labour and materials and how much to independent contractors.

The expenditure is not identified in this way in the accounts submitted to my Department, but it is estimated that the total of nearly £864 million spent on these services in 1975–76 included payments to independent contractors of up to £32 million.

National Health Service (Staff)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many staff employed in National Health Service hospitals are currently engaged on domestic services, housekeeping services, home warden services and ancillary services; and what is the cost of the same.

The whole-time equivalent number of staff employed in the Health Service in the categories requested is given below. I regret that it is not possible to provide statistics for hospital staff alone.

ENGLAND, 30TH SEPTEMBER 1975
Domestic Services—
in the Administrative and Clerical Group, excluding home wardens and assistants1,292
home wardens440
home warden assistants139
1,871
in the Ancillaries Group 65,690
67,561
Catering Services—
in the Administrative and Clerical Group1,306
in the Ancillaries Group 29,270
30,576
Laundry Services—
in the Administrative and Clerical Group330
in the Ancillaries Group 8,991
9,321
Other Ancillary Staff (e.g. porters, drivers, Central Sterile Supplies Department staff, stores staff)63,775
Total173,103
Information is not separately available on the cost of the staff in those services who form part of the Administrative and Clerical Group. However, the total cost in 1975–76 of all staff in the Ancillaries Group, who form the great majority of those listed, was £535·8 million. For the overall cost of the services referred to, I would refer the hon. Member to my hon. Friend's reply to him on 16th May.—[Vol. 932, c.

55–6.]

European Community

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list any unilateral actions taken by any member of the EEC since 1st January 1973 in areas for which his Department is responsible for negotiating on behalf of the United Kingdom, following inability of all EEC members to agree on common action.

My Department maintains no systematic record of unilateral actions which may have been taken by member States in default of Community agreement.

Infant Mortality

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what was the rate of infant mortality in the area covered by the Macclesfield constituency in the most recent year for which figures are available; and how this figure compares with the previous four years.

The infant mortality rates —deaths of children under one year of age per thousand live births—for the area in question are as follows:

197110·6
197210·2
197317·0
197418·8
197511·1

Education And Science

Further Education (Staffordshire)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what extra resources will be allocated to Staffordshire to assist the education authorities to provide additional places in further education.

As announced by my right hon. Friend last week, the Government's response to the MSC working party's report "Young People and Work" has two consequences for education. The extra capital and recurrent resources being made available to provide additional places in further education colleges to assist the needs of the young unemployed will be fully reflected in further education building programmes and in the 1978–79 and subsequent rate support grant settlements. In addition, the extra resources will be made available to reimburse local education authori-ites for their contributions to the MSC programme of opportunities for young people. The allocation of these resources will be determined locally according to what needs to be provided by the education service to support individual parts of the programme.

Southampton Conferences

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science (1) what is her policy towards the initiative of the Southampton Steering Committee for In-Service Education and Training, representing all teacher's organisations, the college of education, the university's education department, the Quinculum Development Centre and the local education authority, in arranging a series of regional conferences on educational matters;(2) whether she intends to accept the invitation to attend any of the regional conferences on education organised by the Southampton Steering Committee for In-Service Education and Training.

My right hon. Friend welcomes local initiatives of this kind. My right hon. Friend was invited to address one of a series of conferences organised by the Southampton Steering Committee but was unable to attend. I agreed to attend in her place. I was later informed by an officer of the Hampshire LEA that the LEA as such had not been aware of the arrangements for the conferences, and on behalf of the authority he withdrew the invitation. I understand that arrangements to hold the conference are, however, still under discussion.

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if she will set out fully the circumstances leading to the withdrawal of the Undersecretary of State from opening the discussion conference of teachers and representatives of the local community planned to take place in Southampton on 12th July 1977.

I was invited to address one of a series of conferences organised by the Southampton Steering Committee but I was unable to accept the invitation. My hon. Friend the Undersecretary of State agreed to attend in my place. She was later informed by the area education officer of the Hampshire LEA that the invitation was withdrawn on the grounds that the timing was inappropriate.

Home Department

Interpol

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) to what extent his cuts in expenditure for 1977–78 will reduce the increased expenditure for Interpol in 1977 of £159,825; and when these cuts are likely to be implemented;(2) why, in the light of cuts in Government expenditure, he has increased the grants and costs to Interpol from £96,655 in 1976 to £159,825 in 1977.

The General Assembly of Interpol decided in 1976 that the cost of the budgetary unit upon which all members' subscriptions are based should be increased in 1977 to meet the increased costs of Interpol's General Secretariat. The change in the cost of the unit accounts for most of the increase in the British contribution. The remaining increase is due to changes in the exchange rate. I am satisfied that, within the overall limits of public expenditure for the Home Office, and taking into account the value of Interpol to the police in the detection of crime, the increased contribution is justified.The contribution for 1977 has been paid as provided in the approved Estimate for the General Protective Services, England and Wales 1977/78 Class IX, Vote 8.

Motoring Offences

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many convictions there were for motoring offences in the Leek parliamentary constituency in each of the past three years.

In 1975 and 1976 there were 2,951 and 2,922 convictions respectively for motoring offences in the magistrates' courts at Biddulph, Cheadle, and Leek in the Leek parliamentary constituency. Figures for 1974 could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many convictions there were for dangerous driving in the United Kingdom in each of the past three years.

The information in relation to England and Wales is as follows:

19749,797
197510,269
197610,126

European Parliament (Electorate)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is the proposed number of electors per member of the European Parliament in Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and each of the regions of England, on the basis of the regional list proposal recently published by the Government.

The information requested is as follows, and is based on the provisional 1977 electorate:

RegionProposed number of Electors per Member ('000s)
Scotland473
Wales514
Northern Ireland344
Northern England465
Yorkshire and Humberside513
North-West England533
West Midlands535
East Midlands550
East Anglia438
South-West England526
South-East England513
Greater London523

Soliciting

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many convictions have been recorded for soliciting by women and for importuning by men, respectively; and if he will consider amending legislation so that prosecution for soliciting or importuning must be corroborated by the complainant and not just by the usual plain clothes police officers.

In 1975 in England and Wales 3,289 females were found guilty of offences against Section 1 of the Street Offences Act 1959 and 614 males of offences against Section 32 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956. I do not consider it appropriate that there should be a requirement that the complainant should give evidence in such cases.

Police (Pay)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will announce the terms of the proposed review of the negotiating machinery for police pay and the names of those who are to undertake it.

I hope that very shortly I shall be able to announce the terms of reference and membership of the review.

Circuses

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he is satisfied that existing statutory provision is effectively preventing ill-treatment of performing wild animals in circuses.

I have no reason to believe that the Performing Animals (Regulation) Act 1925, the Protection of Animals Act 1911 and the Protection of Animals (Scotland) Act 1912 are inadequate. If the hon. Member has evidence to the contrary, I should be glad if he would write to me.

Overseas Development

"Overseas Development"

asked the Minister of Overseas Development how many copies of the publication "Overseas Development" are printed; to whom they are distributed; and what is the total cost.

There are six issues a year, each of 9,000 copies. Distribution is:

Foreign Governments, international organisations3,425
Ministry of Overseas Development and allied staffs1,411
Other Government Departments504
United Kingdom non-governmental organisations1,372
Subscribers (e.g. commercial companies, educational institutions, individuals)1,450
Members of Parliament (at their request)80
The printing and distribution costs amount to £7,500. Approximately £1,300 is recovered from non-official subscribers.

Bolivia

asked the Minister of Overseas Development if she has reached a decision about aid to Bolivia whilst the mining areas remain occupied by the army.

Environment

Local Authority Mortgages

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment with reference to the arrangements for local authority lending for house purchase in 1977–78 under which English local authorities will receive mortgage allocations totalling £273 million for 1977–78, of which £157 million is expected to be provided by the building societies, what part of this latter £157 million is classified as public expenditure.

Advances by the building societies to applicants referred to them by local authorities under the new support scheme do not count as public expenditure.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what arrangements have been made to ensure that local authorities are advised promptly as to how applications to building societies for mortgage finance under the arrangements between the authorities and the societies have been treated so that the authorities can take full advantage of their total allocation on a month-by-month basis.

The close liaison arrangements which we asked the local authorities and building societies to set up should provide for the supply of this information.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what allocations have been made to district councils in Nottinghamshire, to the Nottingham City Corporation and to the Nottinghamshire County Council for 1977–78 both for direct lending by the authorities and for lending by building societies to applicants referred to them by the authorities out of the total of £157 million expected to be provided by the societies; and what allocations have been made by the Government.

The following mortgage lending allocations have been made to councils in Nottinghamshire for their own direct lending and for building society support lending in 1977–78:

Direct lending allocation £000Building society support lending allocation £000
Nottinghamshire County Council150Nil
Ashfield District Council 286557
Bassetlaw District Council189369
Broxtowe District Council 449872
Gedling Borough Council277539
Mansfield District Council139274
Newark District Council160Nil
Nottingham City Council4741,053
Rushcliffe Borough Council202393

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he is satisfied with the operation of the arrangements for local authority mortgage lending in 1977–78, in particular with regard to mortgage finance for small terraced properties in the industrial North.

The arrangements announced by my right hon. Friend on 8th February this year place special emphasis on the need to provide mortgage finance for the purchase of older property. A thorough-going review of progress is now being undertaken by the Department.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will introduce new arrangements for local authority lending for house purchase under which the building societies make a block loan available to local authorities so that they are able to lend and administer money in accordance with provisions for which they are solely responsible.

Sums made available to local authorities under such an arrangement would count against the overall public expenditure provision for house purchase loans. However, the building societies have approved loans totalling £156 million in the past 18 months under the support scheme and agreed to lend £157 million in the financial year 1977–78 to house purchasers nominated by local authorities in England. The Green Paper on housing policy urges building societies and local authorities to build on this foundation of co-operation.

House Purchase And Improvement (Coventry)

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what consideration he will give to increasing the allocation of funds for house purchase and improvement loans to Coventry City Council for the year 1977–78.

On completion of a review of the lending arrangements of local authorities in England, we shall decide, after consulting the local authority associations, what adjustments might appropriately be made in the individual financial allocations. The needs of all local authorities will be carefully examined.

Royal Parks

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he can give an estimate as to the extent catering establishments in the Royal parks are used by visitors from overseas.

No statistics are available, but the caterers for the central parks think that 50 per cent. of their customers may be overseas visitors.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will employ a full-time catering expert to supervise catering operations in the Royal parks;(2) if he will arrange for some competent person or persons to inspect and report on the standards of cleanliness in the catering establishments in the Royal parks.

The Civil Service Catering Organisation at present gives the Department expert advice on Royal parks catering arrangements. A working party is reviewing all aspects of the administration of this catering, and my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State will wish to have the benefit of its report —which should be available soon—before reconsidering the present arrangements.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will terminate the contracts for Trust Houses Forte to run the catering in Hyde Park, Regent's Park and Hampton Court as soon as possible, having regard to the opinion expressed by one of the judges in a competition recently arranged by his Department that they have an unspeakably low standard and the adverse opinions of other judges.

When the judges' comments have been fully considered, they will be discussed with the caterers concerned.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment why catering contracts for the Royal parks are given to the catering compam'es which will give his Department the largest percentage of the profits, in the light of the likely effects on the quality of the catering.

Otters

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will take any action in response to the advice of the Nature Conservancy Council regarding the position of the otter in England and Wales;(2) if he has received advice from the Nature Conservancy Council in regard to the inclusion of the otter in Schedule 1 to the Conservation of Wild Creatures and Wild Plants Act, or about the position and population of the otter in England and Wales.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether, in view of the Joint Otter Group's report that otters in England and Wales are endangered including by factors restricted under the Conservation of Wild Creatures and Wild Plants Act 1975, he will place the otter on Schedule 1 to that Act.

Following the publication of the report of the Joint Otter Group, the Nature Conservancy Council has advised that the otter is endangered in certain areas by a variety of factors and that steps should be taken to prevent any further decline in its numbers and, if possible, to improve its status. The council will now be actively participating in a programme of habitat restoration and management, which I understand will include the establishment of otter havens on a non-statutory basis. I welcome these practical conservation measures, and my Department is ready to offer what help it can towards their implementation.The council also recommended that statutory protection should be given to the otter in England and Wales, but I am seeking further information from the council about its conclusions to enable a decision to be taken on whether the otter can properly be added to Schedule One to the Conservation of Wild Creatures and Wild Plants Act 1975.

Housing Survey

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will give details of the dwelling and housing survey referred to in the Green Paper on Housing Policy.

The survey will provide up-to-date information on housing circumstances in England at national and regional level and in the larger areas of housing stress. About 375,000 households will be interviewed. In each of the London boroughs and in areas of housing stress outside London—listed below— sample sizes will average about 7,000 households.First results are likely to be available early next summer. The total estimated cost is £2 million to £2½million

STRESS AREAS TO BE SURVEYED
RegionArea
NorthernNewcastle
NorthernSunderland
Yorks and HumbersideSheffield
Yorks and HumbersideBradford
Yorks and HumbersideKirklees
Yorks and HumbersideLeeds
Yorks and HumbersideWakefield
South WesternBristol
West MidlandBirmingham
West MidlandDudley
West MidlandSandwell
North WesternLiverpool
North WesternManchester
North WesternSalford
North WesternWigan

Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs

Rhodesia

25.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what conclusions he has been able to reach on prospects for successful negotiations on Rhodesia following the recent visits by the group of British and American officials.

The Anglo/US Consultative Group has returned to Africa for further discussions. The Group will report back within the next few days, and on the basis of its findings, and of other urgent consultations now taking place, my right hon. Friend will decide how best to proceed with the present initiative.

South Africa

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether he has any further plans to visit South Africa.

My right hon. Friend has no firm plans to visit South Africa. In the context of Rhodesia, my right hon. Friend has made it clear that he is ready to return to Africa later this month if it would help to achieve a negotiated settlement.

Terrorists

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if Her Majesty's Government intend to ratify the Geneva Convention extending prisoner-of-war status to terrorists.

There is no Geneva Convention extending prisoner-of-war status to terrorists. The First Additional Protocol to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, which was adopted by consensus at the end of the Fourh Session of the Diplomatic Conference on the ReafBrmation and Development of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict at Geneva, contains a provision—Article 44—which would extend prisoner-of-war status to guerrilla or resistance fighters who are members of organised armed forces taking part in armed conflicts of an international character. As I stated in my reply to the hon. Member for Epping Forest (Mr. Biggs-Davison) on 3rd May, the protocol in which this provision is included does not apply to terrorist activities in peacetime. The question of signature and eventual ratification of the protocol is under consideration.

Helsinki Final Act

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the steps taken to implement the recommendation in Basket II, aims of co-operation, of the Helsinki agreement, fields of co-operation, with regard to fundamental research, monitoring, forecasting and assessment of environmental changes.

I have been asked to reply.The United Kingdom participates in the United Nations Environment Programme's "Earthwatch" which embraces monitoring, research, information exchange, and evaluation and review of environmental changes. We co-operate actively with the USSR on scientific aspects of monitoring under the UK/ USSR Joint Environmental Protection Agreement, and in the work of other international bodies. If the hon. Member requires further information on any specific aspect I shall be ready to write to him.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the steps taken to implement the recommendations in Basket II, aims of co-operation, of the Helsinki agreement, fields of co-operation, with regard to improvement of environmental conditions in areas of human settlement.

I have been asked to reply.The relevant work programmes of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) are currently being restructured in the light of the recommendations of the Helsinki agreement on the improvement of environmental conditions in areas of human settlement. The United Kingdom participates actively in these programmes, and also in co-operative activities in this field, through UNEP, the EEC and other international organisations. This is also an area for joint work under the bilateral UK/USSR Environmental Protection Agreement. If the hon. Member requires further information on any specific aspect I shall be ready to write to him.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the steps taken to implement the recommendations in Basket II, aims of co-operation, of the Helsinki agreement, fields of co-operation, with regard to nature conservation and nature reserves.

I have been asked to reply.In the field of nature conservation and nature reserves the United Kingdom participates actively in the co-operative work of the Council of Europe, UNESCO and UNEP. This is also an area for active co-operation under the UK/USSR Environmental Protection Agreement. If the hon. Member requires further information on any specific aspect I shall be ready to write to him.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the steps taken to implement the recommendations in Basket II, aims of co-operation, of the Helsinki agreement, fields of co-operation, with regard to land utilisation and soils.

I have been asked to reply.The relevant work programmes of the ECE are now directed toward implementation of the environmental recommendations of the Helsinki agreement. The United Kingdom participates fully in all projects concerned with land utilisation and soils, and also participates in co-operative activities in this field sponsored by UNESCO, the UN Food and Agricultural Organisation, the Council of Europe, and land reclamation is a co-operative work area under the UK/USSR Environmental Protection Agreement. If the hon. Member requires any further information on any specific aspect I shall be ready to write to him.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the steps taken to implement the recommendations in Basket II, aims of co-operation, of the Helsinki agreement, fields of co-operation, with regard to protection of the marine environment.

I have been asked to reply.The United Kingdom plays an active role in regional studies under the auspices of the International Council of the Exploration of the Sea and the Inter-gevernmental Oceanographic Commission. We have ratified the Oslo Convention on the prevention of pollution by dumping from ships and aircraft at sea, and the London Convention on the prevention of pollution by dumping of wastes and other matters. We are a signatory to the Paris Convention on the prevention of marine pollution from land based sources. We are also considering with the USSR under the UK/USSR Environmental Protection Agreement possible co-operative studies on aspects of marine pollution which do not duplicate the work of other international bodies. If the hon. Member requires any further information on any specific aspect I shall be ready to write to him.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the steps taken to implement the recommendations in Basket II, aims of co-operation, of the Helsinki agreement, fields of co-operation, with regard to water pollution control and fresh water utilisation.

I have been asked to reply.The United Kingdom participates fully in the work programmes of the ECE concerned with water pollution control and fresh water utilisation. We participated fully in the recent UN Water Conference, and play a full part in other international activities in the UN, the EEC and other international bodies. The prevention of water pollution and the use of water resources is one of the co-operative work areas under the UK/USSR Joint Environmental Protection Agreement. If the hon. Member requires further information on any specific aspect I should be ready to write to him.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the steps taken to implement the recommendations in Basket II, aims of co-operation, of the Helsinki agreement, fields of co-operation with regard to control of air pollution.

I have been asked to reply.The United Kingdom is participating fully in the work of the ECE's Air Pollution Working Party, and in particular in its co-operative programme for the monitoring and evaluation of the long-range transmission of pollutants in Europe. The prevention of air pollution is one of the co-operative work areas under UK/USSR Joint Environmental Protection Agreement. We also participate in the work of the World Meteorological Organisation, the EEC and other international bodies in this field. If the hon. Member requires further information on any specific aspect, I shall be ready to write to him.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the steps taken, with reference to Basket II, possibilities for improving co-peration, of the Helsinki agreement, in regard to envirnmental research.

I have been asked to reply.The United Kingdom participates fully in the co-operative environmental research work of the EEC and generally in the EEC's continuing efforts to fulfil the tasks allotted to it in the Final Act. The United Kingdom also co-operates actively through the EEC and other international organisations, and bilaterally with the USSR under the UK/USSR Environmental Protection Agreement, in research on problems related to the human envirop-ment. If the hon Member requires further information on any specific aspect I shall be ready to write to him.

Transport

Driving Tests (West Wickham)

26.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport what is currently the first available date for driving tests at the West Wickham, Kent, test centre; how the present length of the waiting list compares with the position at this centre in July 1976; and what steps he is taking to reduce the waiting time for learner drivers in the Bromley area.

18 weeks, compared with 28 weeks a year ago. If the demand for tests continues at about its present level, the waiting time should continue to fall over the next six months.

Motorways (Fog Warning Lights)

asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he is satisfied with the operation of the fog warning lights on motorways; and if he will make a statement.

Control of hazard warning lights rests with chief officers of police, and we are satisfied that their operation is making a major contribution to motorway safety. Earlier flashing amber warning lights are being progressively replaced by more informative remote-controlled signals with an additional panel to show lane closures, diversions, and the maximum speed at which it is advisable to drive.

Road Accidents (Lorries)

asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many juggernaut lorries have been involved in road accidents with other vehicles and have resulted in the death or serious injury of occupants of vehicles or pedestrians over the past five years, on roads other than motorways, indicating the class of the road and whether the accident occurred in a dual carriageway.

I regret that this information is not available in the form requested, since there is no generally accepted definition of the term "juggernaut". The following figures of fatal or serious accidents involving vehicles over 1½ tons unladen weight are available for 1976:

HEAVY GOODS VEHICLES† INVOLVED IN FATAL OR SERIOUS ACCIDENTS*: GREAT BRITAIN: 1976
Number
A Roads
Dual Carriageway513
All3,077
B Roads
Dual Carriageways14
All511
Other Roads‡
Dual Carriageway25
All…1,034
† Over 1½ tons unladen weight.
* Excluding single vehicle accidents where no pedestrian injured, and one vehicle and pedestrian accidents.
‡ Excluding motorways and A(M) roads.
It is not possible to provide figures for earlier years except at disproportionate cost.In general, vehicles over 1½ tons unladen are less involved than cars or light vans in accidents per distance travelled, but when they are so involved the accident is much more likely to lead to fatal or serious injuries.

Subsidies (London)

asked the Secretary of State for Transport what subsidies and grants were paid (a) for capital purposes and (b) for revenue purposes from the Exchequer for transport in the London area last year.

I would refer the right hon. Gentleman to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Islington, North (Mr. O'Halloran) on Friday 27th May.—[Vol. 932, c. 658.] Infrastructure grant and principal roads specific grant were paid for capital purposes. Transport supplementary grant is given for transport purposes generally and is not allocated between capital and revenue expenditure.

Cambridge Park, Wanslead

asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he will announce the holding of a public inquiry into his Department's proposals for the widening of Cambridge Park. Wanstead.

Palace Of Westminster (Staff)

asked the Lord President of the Council whether he will list, by office or by title, all those employed within the Palace of Westminster, other than those in the service of the House of Lords, who are in receipt of a salary in excess of £6,200 per annum.

pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 23rd June 1977; Vol. 933, c. 555–6], gave the following further information:The statement referred to is in the Library, not the Vote Office.

Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

European Community

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list any unilateral actions taken by any member of the EEC since 1st January 1973 in areas for which his Department is respon- sible for negotiating on behalf of the United Kingdom, following inability of all EEC members to agree on common action.

My Department maintains no systematic record of unilateral actions which may have been taken by member States in the absence of Community agreement.

National Finance

Post-War Credits

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what action has been taken to date to trace the owners of post-war credits;(2) what further action is planned to trace the owners of post-war credits.

The possibility of the Inland Revenue taking the initiative in tracing post-war credit holders has been considered, but the great majority could not be found, and for the small residue, the work could only be undertaken at prohibitive cost. The credits are recorded under the war-time names and addresses of the credit holders. In the vast majority of cases the taxpayer can no longer be traced at that address, and many women credit holders will have married and changed their names. It follows that the initiative for claiming repayment must rest with the credit holder.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if proposals have been considered about contingency plans for distributing the £48 million post-war credits plus £19 million interest currently still held.

No. No fund is set aside for the repayment of post-war credits, which are repaid out of the Consolidated Fund.

Family Incomes

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish a table showing the net income after tax, national insurance contribution and family allowance or child benefit of a married couple with two children and a married couple with four children as a percentage of the net income of a single person in 1960–61 and in 1977–78. assuming earnings equal to 50 per cent. and 100 per cent. of average male manual earnings in each case.

Net income as a percentage of the corresponding net income of a single person for
YearEarnings(a)Married couple with 2 children(b)Married couple with 4 children
1960–61Half x Average earnings113·1129·4
Average earnings117·8130·0
1977–78Half x Average earnings127·5145·2
Average earnings115·2125·6
Net income is earnings plus family allowance or child benefit less income tax and national insurance contributions.
For 1960–61 average earnings are taken from the Department of Employment's survey in April 1960 of the average earnings of full-time adult male manual workers. For 1977–78 the April 1976 New Earnings Survey estimate of the average earnings of similar workers has been updated to April 1977 by the monthly index of average earnings.
The figures for 1977–78 assume the full implementation of the Budget proposals.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish a table showing the effect of tax changes and of phases 1 and 2 of the incomes policy, on the net income after tax, national insurance contribution and family allowance or child benefit, but excluding means-tested benefits, of a

Gross weekly earnings in April 1975Net weekly income
(a)single person(b)Married couple with 2 children not over 11
April 1975April 1976April 1977April 1975April 1976April 1977
£££££££
2519·4123·3225·6225·1230·3433·11
3525·3629·2431·7531·1036·2639·24
4531·3135·1737·9137·0542·1945·40
5537·2641·0944·3443·0048·1151·83
6543·2147·0250·7748·9554·0458·26
For the purposes of the calculations it has been assumed that gross weekly earnings were increased by £6 between April 1975 and April 1976, and by 5 per cent., subject to a minimum increase of £2·50 and a maximum increase of £4, between April 1976 and April 1977.
Net weekly income is gross earnings plus family allowance or child benefit less income tax and national insurance contributions. For April 1977 the figures assume full implementation of the Budget proposals.

Income Tax And National Insurance

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the grossed-up starting rate of income tax plus national insurance contribution, having regard to the fact that the latter is paid out of taxed income.

Assuming a basic rate of income tax of 35 per cent. the rate of total deductions from each additional £1 earned is 40·75 per cent., including national insurance contributions of 5·75 per cent. With a basic rate of 33 per cent. the percentage rate of deductions would be 38·75. If insurance contributions are expressed as a percentage

Assuming that none of the children is over 11 years of age the figures are as follows:single person and a married couple with two children, assuming incomes in April 1975 of £25, £35, £45, £55 and £65 respectively, and assuming in each case that the maximum allowable wage increases have been paid.

The figures are as follows:of incremental income after basic rate tax the percentages are 8·85 and 8·58 respectively.

Income Tax

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what percentage of single persons, married couples and married couples with one, two, three and four children, who were either employed or self-employed, paid income tax in 1950, 1960, 1970 and the latest date for which the information is available.

I regret that the precise information required is not available. The figures in the table show the percentages who paid tax in the given years of all the cases in each group whose incomes were reviewed for tax by the Inland Revenue. The single and married without children categories contained

Percentage of taxpayers
Married
Single(no children)No children1 child2 children3 children4 or more children
1969–70829193939080
1974–75829395949081

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will estimate the cost in revenue terms compared with the revenue estimated for the 1977 Budget proposals with the 33 per cent. basic rate assumption, of moving to an income tax structure under which the first £10,000 of taxable income would be charged at 30 per cent., the next £5,000 at 40 per cent. and the balance at 50 per cent.

pursuant to his [Official Report, 30th June 1977; Vol. 934, c. 313], gave the following information:At 1977–78 income levels the cost would be about £2,250 million.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will provide estimated figures for 1977–78 on the same basis as those provided for earlier years in the Written Answer given to the hon. Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Rooker) Official Report, 27th June, c. 91.]

pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 4th July 1977; Vol. 934, c. 403], gave the following information:The estimates for 1977–78 are:

'000
Number taken out of income tax Budget changes625
Number liable to income tax Married couples are counted as one.20,855

Housekeeper Allowance

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the cost of extending the housekeeper allowance at a current rate at £200 per annum, at £300 per annum and at £400 per annum, respectively, to women with children under 11 years of age and to women in work who care for elderly dependants.

significant proportions of pensioners many of whom were economically inactive. The proportion of taxpayers was lower in these pensioner groups. There are no comparable figures for the earlier years.

pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 29th June 1977; Vol. 934, c. 231], gave the following information:It is not possible to make precise calculations, but the costs for 1977–78 would be of the following orders of magnitude:

£ millions
£10010
£20020
£30030
£40040

Widows

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much tax has been paid by widows in each of the last five years.

pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 27th June 1977; Vol. 934, c. 87], gave the following information:The latest estimates of income tax on all sources of income from widows are as follows:

£ millions
1972–73180
1973–74200
1974–75330
1975–76400
1976–77500

Pensioners

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much tax was paid by State retirement pensioners in each of the last five years.

pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 27th June 1977; Vol. 934, c. 86], gave the following information:Estimates for retirement pensioners alone are not available, but the latest estimates of tax paid on all forms of income from those aged 65 and over, and from those under 65 with national

insurance retirement pensions or widows' benefits are as follows:

£ millions
1972–73780
1973–74930
1974–751,380
1975–761,650
1976–772,000

Employment

Unemployed Persons

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will make a statement about the implementation of the Holland Report on measures to assist young unemployed persons.

As my right hon. Friend announced in the House on 29th June, the Manpower Services Commission has been asked to operate a new opportunities programme for unemployed young people on the lines of its proposals based on its Working Party's report on "Young People and Work". This programme will provide a range of work experience and work preparation courses. It will be in full operation by September 1978 when, with other programmes for young people, it will provide up to 130,000 places which should benefit over 230,000 young people a year. Those participating will be paid an allowance of £18 a week and the full programme will cost about £160 million a year.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether he has any further plans to reduce unemployment; and if he will make a statement.

On 29th June my right hon. Friend announced in this House the further measures which the Government have decided to take to reduce unemployment. These include a new youth opportunities programme which will give up to 230,000 unemployed youngsters each year a chance of work experience or training. This is about double the provision for young people under the present scheme. The emphasis of the programme will be on helping those who are least qualified and with the poorest employment prospects. It is the Government's firm intention that no summer or Easter school leavers who remain unemployed the following Easter should be without the offer of a place under the programme. In addition the youth employment subsidy scheme will be extended to 31st March 1978.My right hon. Friend also announced two new provisions to help unemployed adults, replacing the existing job creation programme. The first will provide 8,000 places for adults from the unemployment register to instruct and supervise youngsters on work experience schemes. The second, the special temporary employment programme (STEP) will provide temporary employment opportunities of up to 12 months for those aged 19 and over. In addition, the job release scheme has been extended to 31st March 1978, but from 1st July it will only apply to those in employment in the assisted areas.

Job Creation

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what criteria he uses in giving details about job creation programmes in certain particular areas and not in others.

The pressure of work on the staff. At present it is most important that the staff concentrate so far as possible on the development of the Commission's new programme to assist unemployed young people.

Staffordshire

asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many teenagers are at present employed in Staffordshire.

I regret that the information is not available. The employment returns do not require firms to provide information about the age of employees.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is his estimate of the trend of teenage unemployment in Staffordshire until Christmas.

I regret that it is not possible to make reliable estimates of this kind. This will depend not only on general economic conditions but also on the response of employers and others to the new youth opportunities programme.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list in the Official Report the number of teenagers who were unemployed in Staffordshire in each of the last 10 years at midsummer and at Christmas; and if he will express these in percentage terms.

The only figure, of those asked for, which is available is that for July 1976. This is as follows:

Number unemployed in Staffordshire under 20 years of age
July 19766,310
It is not know what percentage this is of young people who are unemployed, but it is known that it represents 32·5 per cent. of all those unemployed in Staffordshire in July 1976.These figures should be viewed against the background that they include large numbers of school leavers; and yet employers do not generally start school leavers until later in the summer.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will publish in the Official Report, in rank order, the amount of money devoted to each county to reduce unemployment among teenagers.

The information is not available in the form requested and could not be obtained without disproportionate cost.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what share of the new schemes, and extensions of existing schemes, which he announced on 29th June, will accrue to Staffordshire.

Allocation of funds for the youth employment subsidy and the job creation and work experience programmes are not made on a county basis, and the amount going to Staffordshire will depend on the extent to which people and organisations in the county come forward with applications under the schemes. The job release scheme, which applies to those living in Staffordshire but working outside in an assisted area, has been extended to 31st March 1978, with the proviso that it will in future apply only to the employed. I am informed by the Manpower Services Commission that detailed implementation of the new programme announced on 29th June has still to be worked out. However, it is intended that the allocation of resources for the new programme for young people should be related to local variations in levels of youth unemploy- ment. The resources of the special temporary employment programme (STEP) for adults will be concentrated in areas of particularly high unemployment. Both programmes will, of course, operate throughout the country.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many extra unemployment specialist posts are to be allocated to Staffordshire.

Allocation of the 170 extra posts which my right hon. Friend announced on 29th June 1977 has not yet begun.

Footwear

asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether he has had any discussions with the Chairman and officers of the Central Arbitration Committee regarding the case of equal pay that was submitted by the Managerial, Administrative, Technical and Supervisory Association for the Dunlop Footwear workers, Liverpool, especially as the Committee met on 25th February and to date a reply has not been sent.

I have had no discussion with the Chairman or officers of the Central Arbitration Committee about this case, and as the CAC is an independent statutory body it would not be right for me to do so. The decision in the case referred to was notified to the parties on 1st July.

Dock Work Regulation Act 1976

asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether he will make a statement about the implementation of the Dock Work Regulation Act 1976.

Consultations as required under the Act have been taking place about the appointments to be made to the reconstituted National Dock Labour Board for which the Act provides. These have now been completed, and I have today made the Dock Work Regulation Act 1976 (Commencement No. 1) Order 1977 bringing into force those sections of the Act dealing with matters concerning the establishment of the reconstituted Board and providing for the preparation of a new dock labour scheme. These sections of the Act will come into force on 1st August, and appointments to the new Board will take effect from that date. I hope very shortly to announce the membership of the Board.The remaining and main sections of the Act, and in particular those relating to the classification of dock work, will be brought into force as soon as the new Board has had the opportunity to decide what administrative arrangements will be necessary to carry out the duties placed upon it by these provisions. Work is proceeding on the drafting of a new dock labour scheme, and a draft scheme will in due course be published as required by the Act, so that persons interested may make representations about it before it is laid before Parliament for approval.

Job Release Scheme

asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether bearing in mind the proposed changes in social security payments and retirement pensions in November, it is proposed to increase the rate of allowance paid under the job release scheme.

From 14th November 1977 the rate of allowance will be increased to £26·50 a week tax free.

Energy

Gas Explosions

asked the Secretary of State for Energy how many gas explosions causing injury or damage were reported in each of the past three years.

Explosions causing injury or damage valued at £100 or more totalled 100 in 1974–75, 128 in 1975–76 and 111 in 1976–77. Further information about gas explosions can be obtained from the Report of the Inquiry into Serious Gas Explosions, copies of which, as my right hon. Friend announced to the House on 28th June— [Vol. 934, c. 111.]—have been placed in the Library of the House.

Electricity (Price And Consumption)

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will set out in tabular form (a) the movement in the real price of electricity from 1945 to the latest available date and (b) in a parallel table, the movement in electricity consumption per capita over the same period.

pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 29th June 1977; Vol. 934, c. 215], gave the following information:The figures are:

ELECTRICITY
(a)(b)
YearMovement in real price to domestic consumersAverage consumption per domestic consumer in Great Britain
Pence per KWh(1976money)KWh
19482·5541,229
19492·6461,187
19502·4801,245
19512·2471,364
19522·2861,316
19532·3631,325
19542·3581,366
19552·2351,459
19562·2421,587
19572·2421,617
19582·2771,793
19592·2401,902
19602·1462,157
19612·0922,406
19622·0592,827
19632·0643,187
19642·0933,127
19652·0753,353
19662·0603,442
19671·9853,520
19682·1373,702
19691·9613,947
19701·8024,158
19711·7704,306
19721·7514,571
19731·6814,754
19741·6734,775
19751·9514,532
19762·1484,267
(a) is derived from the average net selling value per KWh in Great Britain and estimates of "The Internal Purchasing Power of the Pound". The former is published in the "Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics" and the latter is given in the leaflet of that name published by the Central Statistical Office. The average net selling value—revenue divided by consumption—is influenced by variations in consumption and changes between tariffs by consumers as well as by changes in tariff charges.
It is regretted that there are no figures on average net selling values or average consumption for domestic consumers in Great Britain before 1948.

European Community

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will list any unilateral actions taken by any member of the EEC since 1st January 1973 in areas for which his Department is responsible for negotiating on behalf of the United Kingdom, following inability of all EEC members to agree on common action.

My Department maintains no systematic record of unilateral actions which may have been taken by member States.

PUBLIC EXPENDITURE AT £ MILLION 1976 SURVEY PRICES
1973–74 (Outturn)1977–78 (Cmnd. 5519)1977–78 (Cmnd. 6721)
(a) Local authority improvement investment492215318
(b) Improvement grants18917872
(c) Loans and grants to housing associations for improvement work20100100
The figures are based on Cmnd. 6721 with the additional expenditure of £30 million in 1977–78 announced by the Secretary of State for the Environment on 2nd May.
The figures for improvement grants include small amounts for housing associations not included in line (c).
The figures in line (c) are approximate as records are not kept so as to identify precisely the improvement element in housing association schemes.
The figures for 1977–78 from Cmnd. 5519, published in December 1973, have been revalued to 1976 Survey Prices.

Wales

Farmers' Union Of Wales

asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will now grant full recognition to the Farmers' Union of Wales for Government purposes, as representing, together with the NFU, farming interests in Wales.

My right hon. Friend the Minister of Agriculture and I are currently considering the union's request. There are, however, many factors to be taken into account, and I cannot yet say when a decision will be reached. Meanwhile, there are long-standing informal arrangements whereby the union is able to make its views known.

Environment

Housing (Expenditure)

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what was the value at 1976 survey prices of Government expenditure on (a) local authority investment on improvements (b) improvement grants for private owners and (c) housing association loans and grants for improvement in 1973–74 and 1977–78.

Information relating to England is as follows:lime was used on Welsh land in each of the years from 1956 to 1976.

The information requested is as follows:

Year ended 31st MayThousand Tons
1956452
1957420
1958470
1959387
1960464
1961336
1962350
1963318
1964300
1965318
1966299
1967250
1968222
1969234
1970210
1971236
1972262
1973279
1974281
1975234
1976267

Road Construction Programme

asked the Secretary of State for Wales what other road projects have been given the go-ahead by his Department following the recent completion of a major portion of the M4 motorway in Wales.

Since the opening of the M4 Pontardulais bypass on 29th April 1977 tenders have been invited for the following major schemes:

  • M4, Castleton-Coryton section.
  • M4, Bridgend northern bypass (advance works).
  • A5, Britannia Bridge and approach roads.
  • A40, St. Clears bypass.
Other major schemes programmed to start during the current financial year are:

  • A40/A470, Brecon southern and eastern bypass.
  • A55, Casino junction improvement.
  • A55, Diversion east of Abergele.
  • A487, Caernarfon inner relief road.
  • A550, Queensferry interchange.

Defence

Helsinki Agreement

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what notification of military movements, as suggested in Basket I of the Helsinki Agreement, has

Sponsoring CountryName and period of manoeuvre
Major manoeuvres
Federal Republic of GermanyGrosser Baer—6th-10th September 1976.
Smaller Scale Manoeuvres
Turkey*Deep Express—12th-28th September 1975.
NorwayBatten Bolt—3rd-7th October 1975.
NorwayAtlas Express—24th February-23rd March 1976.
NorwayTeam Work 76–10th–24th September 1976.
* Deep Express was notified jointly by the United Kingdom and Turkey.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list all occasions since the signing of the Helsinki Agreement in which the United Kingdom, or any other member of NATO, has received prior notification of military manoeuvres by members of the Warsaw Pact, or other signatory country of the Helsinki Agree-

Sponsoring CountryName and period of manoeuvre
USSRCaucasus—26th January-6th February 1976.
USSRSever—14th-18th June 1976.
PolandShield 76–9th–16th September 1976.
USSRNo name notified—31st March-5th April 1977.
USSRCarpathia—11th-16th July 1977.

been given by any signatory country of the Helsinki Agreement to any other signatory country, other than military manoeuvres.

We are aware of no military movements which have been notified in accordance with the voluntary provision on the notification of major military movements contained in the Helsinki Agreement.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list all the occasions on which the United Kingdom has given notification of military manoeuvres in advance, or had notification regarding military manoeuvres in which it was taking part given, to other signatories of the Helsinki Agreement, as required under Basket I, Confidence-Building Measures, of the Helsinki Agreement.

The United Kingdom has held one manoeuvre since the Helsinki Agreement which was notified under the terms of the provision on the notification of military manoeuvres. The manoeuvre known as "Spearpoint" took place between 2nd and 11th November 1976 and was notified with more than 21 days' notice to all signatory countries.United Kingdom forces have taken part in five other notified manoeuvres sponsored by NATO countries. These were:ment, as required under Basket I, Confidence-Building Measures, of the Helsinki Agreement.

Warsaw Pact countries have notified signatories to the Helsinki Agreement of five major military manoeuvres—defined as involving more than 25,000 toroops. These were:

Hungary has also notified signatories to the Helsinki Agreement of two smaller-scale military manoeuvres in April and October 1976. However, the period of advance notice was 24 hours or less in both cases.

Sponsoring Country

Name and period of manoeuvre

Major Manoeuvres

SwitzerlandNo name notified—10th—18th November 1975.

Smaller-Scale Manoeuvres

YugoslaviaNo name notified—21st-25th October 1975.
YugoslaviaGolija 76–20th–23rd September 1976.
SwedenPoseidon—2nd-6th October 1976.
SwedenVonn 77–4th–9th March 1977.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list, with reference to Basket I, Questions Relating to Disarmament, of the Helsinki Agreement, which of the signatory countries have, respectively, increased or decreased their armed forces' expenditure since the signing of the Helsinki Agreement, giving his estimate of the percentage increase or decrease in the case of each signatory country; and what is his estimate of the percentage spent by each such country on defence.

The only figures which are available for comparison of the defence expenditure of countries signatory to the Helsinki Agreement before and after that agreement are those for 1975 and 1976 respectively. The defence expenditures of NATO countries as a percentage of Gross National Products were:

19751976
Belgium3·43·4
Canada2·32·3
Denmark3·03·0
France4·44·3
Germany4·13·8
Greece7·1
Italy3·02·8
Luxembourg1·11·0
Netherlands3·93·7
Norway3·73·5
Portugal5·84·6
Turkey(1974: 4·1)
United Kingdom5·55·5
United States6·56·4
The percentages of gross national products expended on defence by the Warsaw Pact countries in 1975 and 1976 are estimated to have been:

USSR11–13
Bulgaria3
Czechoslovakia5
GDR6
Hungary3
Poland4
Romania2

Neutral and non-aligned countries have notified a total of five manoeuvres. In all cases the advanced period of notification was at least that required by the Helsinki Agreement. The manoeuvres were:

The defence burdens of the neutral countries expressed as percentages of gross national products were:

1975

1976

Switzerland1·81·8
Sweden4·04· 0
Yugoslavia5·2
Spain1·92· 3
Finland1·41·3
Austria1·01·1

The lists omit the smaller CSCE participants.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what confidence-building measures, other than notification of military manoeuvres and movements, have been made by any signatory country of the Helsinki Agreement, as suggested in Basket I, under the heading Other Confidence-Building Measures, of the Helsinki Agreement.

The other confidence building measures referred to involve the exchange of military personnel between countries signatory to the Helsinki Agreement. Before and since the Helsinki Agreement there have been many such exchanges, which seek to promote better mutual understanding. In implementing the Final Act provisions, the United Kingdom has endeavoured to continue and develop on a reciprocal basis the exchanges which it had already promoted prior to the Helsinki Agreement.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list all occasions on which any observers from any Warsaw Pact country have attended any military manoeuvres by, respectively, United Kingdom forces, NATO forces, including occasions when no British forces took part, and forces of neutral countries which signed the Helsinki Agreement, as required under Basket I, Confidence-Building Measures of the Helsinki Agreement.

Observers from Warsaw Pact countries have been invited on five occasions to attend NATO manoeuvres, including three in which United Kingdom forces took part. None of these invitations was accepted. Warsaw Pact countries have, however, despatched observers in response to invitations to attend a Swiss manoeuvre in November 1976, a Yugoslav manoeuvre in September 1976 and a Swedish manoeuvre in March 1977.

Sponsoring CountryName and period of manoeuvre
USSRCaucasus—26th January-6th February 1976.
USSRSever—14th-l8th June 1976.
PolandShield 76–9th–16th September 1976.
USSRCarpathia—llth-16th July 1977.
We are not aware of any occasion on which NATO or neutral observers have not been dispatched in response to invi-

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list all occasions when, respectively, observers from the United Kingdom, or other NATO, or neutral signatory countries, have attended military manoeuvres in which any armed forces of the Warsaw Pact took part, as required under Basket I, Confidence-Building Measures, of the Helsinki Agreement.

Observers from the United Kingdom have not been invited to any Warsaw Pact military manoeuvres.Observers from other NATO and neutral countries have been invited on four occasions to Warsaw Pact manoeuvres:tations to attend Warsaw Pact manoeuvres.