Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 971: debated on Monday 23 July 1979

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Monday 23 July 1979

European Assembly

asked the Prime Minister, in the light of the fact that Government Departments are inaccurately describing the Assembly of the EEC as the European Parliament, what instructions she proposes to issue to ensure that the institution is correctly described.

None.The term "Assembly" appears in the Treaties and is legally correct: but the institution has described itself since 1962 as the European Parliament and this term is generally in use throughout the Community. The Government accept the common usage, which does not affect the nature of the institution; we shall con-

TOTAL EXPENDITURE WITHIN THE AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION AND SCIENCE (1973–78)
Financial years£ million at 1978 survey prices
1973–741974–751975–761976–771977–78
Total capital and recurrent expenditure7,4817,5087,6137,6047,341
Capital expenditure as a proportion13·7 per cent.10·3 per cent.9·5 per cent.8·5 per cent.6·7 per cent.

School Populations

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list counties in terms of estimated increases or decreases in secondary school and primary school populations, respectively, for each of the next three years, showing in each case the estimate percentage increase or decrease.

Detailed projections of pupils in schools for individual county authorities are not prepared by my Department.

Nursery, Primary And Secondary Education

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science (1) if he will list the per capita expenditure per local education authority in England and Wales on nursery education;(2) if he will list the per capita expenditure per local education authority in England and Wales on primary education;(3) if he will list the per capita expenditure for each local education authority in

tinue to use the term "Assembly" in legal Acts or where it is necessary to distinguish that institution from Parliament at Westminster.

Education And Science

Departmental Budget

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will publish in the Official Report for each year since 1973 (a) the total budget administered by his Department and (b) the proportion of that budget spent on capital projects, both measured in terms of constant prices.

My Department does not prepare figures of expenditure for each local education authority. Certain analyses of their estimates and expenditure are contained in the education statistics published annually by the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, copies of which are available in the Library.

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will issue a circular advising local education authorities to maintain and extend nursery provision.

No: such advice would be inconsistent with the present need to reduce public expenditure.

Examination (16 Years-Plus)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what action he proposes to take in respect of proposals for a single system of examining at 16 years-plus to replace the present GCE O-level and CSE examinations; and if he will make a statement.

I recognise that the present dual system of examining at 16-plus is unsatisfactory in a number of respects, for reasons such as those set out in chapter I of the report of Sir James Waddell's steering committee (Cmnd 7281). The Government believe it to be right to seek to remedy these deficiencies, provided this can be done without putting educational standards, particularly those represented by GCE O-levels, and public confidence in those standards, at risk. I am not satisfied that the previous Government's proposals, set out in the White Paper "Secondary Schools Examinations: A Single System at 16 Plus" (Cmnd. 7368) would necessarily accomplish this. Together with my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales I shall therefore initiate further consultations with the major interested parties before the Government reach decisions on this matter.

School Meals

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether the school meals service will remain as a statutory service under the relevant legislation.

The present statutory requirements in respect of the provision of school meals are under consideration in the context of the review of public expenditure.

Overseas Development

Aid Programme

asked the Lord Privy Seal if he can now announce where the cuts in the overseas aid programme will occur; and if he will give details.

I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply given to the hon. Member for Glasgow, Queen's Park (Mr. McElhone) on 16 July.

Tanzania

asked the Lord Privy Seal what response he will now make to the request from the Government of Tanzania for special aid to help offset the consequences of the conflict with Uganda.

Development aid cannot be used directly or indirectly for military purposes. What we can do is to assist Tanzania with her general development requirements, and this is already being done on a substantial scale. The Tanzanian special request has been received, and will require co-ordinated consideration by the international community. Our own response must to some extent be dependent on the outcome of the public expenditure review.

Chewton Glen Hotel, Hants (Conference Expenditure)

asked the Lord Privy Seal what was the final hotel bill at the Chewton Glen Hotel, New Milton, Hants., for the conference organised last year by the right hon. Member for Lanark (Mrs. Hart).

Indonesia

asked the Lord Privy Seal if he intends to review the provision of aid to Indonesia in the light of the record of the Indonesian Government in East Timor where a significant percentage of the population has been killed as the result of the Indonesian invasion.

Indonesia is still one of the poorest developing countries and we have a continuing programme there. Human rights will be among the many factors taken into account in considering our future aid programmes.

Industry

Manufacturing Industry

5.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what measures he is taking to create a climate conducive to a higher level of output in manufacturing industry.

The measures we have taken and those which we are now considering seek to reduce Government intervention and cut public expenditure as part of our broad economic strategy to reduce inflation, to release resources for productive use and to stimulate enterprise.

40.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what measures he is taking to create a climate conducive to a higher level of output in manufacturing industry.

The measures we have taken and those which we are now considering seek to reduce Government intervention and cut public expenditure as part of our broad economic strategy to reduce inflation, to release resources for productive use and to stimulate enterprise.

Sector Working Parties

14.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what is his policy towards the sector working parties of the National Economic Development Office.

The effectiveness of sector working parties is now being reviewed by the director general of the National Economic Development Office. He will present his recommendations to the National Economic Development Council in due course.

European Regional Development Fund

29.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what is the total value of grants towards projects in England received from the European regional development fund since 1975.

£130·2 million. This includes £55·8 million in respect of industrial projects and £74·4 million in respect of infrastructure projects.

Regional Assistance

31.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry when he expects to make a statement on regional assistance.

Details of the Government's approach to regional assistance were given in the announcement which my right hon. Friend made on 17 July.

43.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what studies he has made of the effectiveness of previous policies towards regional aid.

I refer to the answer given earlier today to my hon. Friend the Member for Southampton, Test (Mr. Hill).

Intermediate Regions

25.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will make a statement on which regions will lose their intermediate status.

My right hon. Friend announced on 17 July the results of the Government's review of regional industrial policy including the future pattern of intermediate areas.

West Midlands

28.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will make a statement outlining prospects for manufacturing industry in the West Midlands for the rest of the current year.

Prospects for manufacturing industry in the West Midlands will be enhanced by the measures which we are currently taking to improve the general economic climate. Industry in the West Midlands should also benefit from the increase in exemption limit for industrial development certificates which my right hon. Friend announced on 17 July.

British Steel Corporation

33.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry when he intends to meet the chairman of the British Steel Corporation.

34.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry when he intends to meet Sir Charles Villiers, chairman of the British Steel Corporation.

My right hon. Friend has frequent contact with the chairman on a wide range of matters affecting the corporation.

Small Businesses

32.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how he intends to create a climate in which small businesses can prosper.

Our Budget measures to make risk-taking more worthwhile and measures to remove obstacles to growth relate to the start-up of small businesses and their subsequent development. We are consulting interested parties about the interim report of the Wilson committee, which examines the financial aspects of small firms, and these views will influence our future policy.

49.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what representations he has received from small business organisations on relieving them of time-consuming form filling imposed by Government Departments.

A number of representations have been received from small business organisations as well as from individual small firms.

National Enterprise Board

35.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry when he intends next to meet the chairman of the National Enterprise Board.

Steel Industry

36.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he is satisfied that British Steel is making sufficient progress towards reducing overmanning and excess capacity.

The corporation will have to work hard to achieve its targets. We shall monitor progress and judge by results.

38.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry which financial aids to the United Kingdom steel industry will be discontinued following the acceptance by the Government of the Common Market code governing national aids to steel industries.

The Government are still considering the decision but have no reason to believe that accepting it would lead to any particular form of aid being discontinued. Individual cases would be judged by the European Commission against Community criteria.

45.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what plans he has for any restructuring of or mergers within the steel industry.

None. It is for the industry itself to plan for and manage its own future.

London Boroughs Association

37.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what plans he has to meet the officers of the London Boroughs Association to discuss future industrial development in London.

My right hon. Friend has at present no plans to meet representatives of the London Boroughs Association.

Post Office

39.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he is satisfied that the existing monopoly powers of the Post Office are in the public interest.

As my hon. Friend the Under-Secretary of State stated in reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Louth (Mr. Brotherton) on 4 July, we are looking into these matters with the aim of ensuring an efficient service at a reasonable cost.

44.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he is satisfied that the existing monopoly powers of the Post Office are in the public interest.

As I stated in reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Louth (Mr. Brotherton) on 4 July, we are looking into these matters with the aim of ensuring an efficient service at a reasonable cost.

46.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry when he expects to meet Sir William Barlow, chairman of the Post Office.

I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave earlier today to my hon. Friend the Member for Romford (Mr. Neubert).

48.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what measures he is considering in order to increase productivity in the Post Office.

I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given earlier today to my hon. Friend the Member for Epsom and Ewell (Mr. Hamilton).

Ministerial Role

41.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what role he will play as a result of his non-interventionist policies in industry.

Merseyside

42.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what steps he proposes to take to regenerate industry on Merseyside.

Since most of the present Merseyside special development area will remain a special development area, it should benefit from the changes in regional policy announced by my right hon. Friend on 17 July, as the incentives will now be focused on those places with the worst problems.

Shipbuilding Industry

47.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he has yet reached a decision regarding the advisability or otherwise of a scrap and build scheme for the shipbuilding industry.

British Leyland

50.

asked the Secretary or State for Industry whether he will make a statement on the British Leyland corporate plan, a copy of which was placed in the Library on 2 April.

No. A parliamentary statement was made by the previous Administration on 2 April and no further comment was felt necessary by this Administration on entering office.

Docklands

51.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will make a statement for regenerating industry in docklands.

Our policies are designed to create a proper climate in which commerce and industry can flourish. This will help regenerate industry in docklands as elsewhere.

Iron Foundry Industry

52.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what plans he has for a reorganisation of the iron foundry industry; and if he will make a statement.

None. It is for the industry itself to plan its own future. However, the existing scheme, under section 8 of the Industry Act, aimed at assisting foundries with their modernisation projects, will be allowed to run its course.

Corby (Steelworks)

53.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he will consider visiting Corby, Northamptonshire, to discuss the proposed closure of the steelworks; and if he will make a statement.

My right hon. Friend has no present plans to visit Corby. It is for the management to make decisions about the future of the steelworks, consulting the trade unions as appropriate.

British Aerospace

54.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will make a statement on the future of British Aerospace.

I refer the hon. Member to the statement made by my right hon. Friend earlier today.

St Helens

55.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will give the reasons why St. Helens, formerly a special development area, has been downgraded to development area status in the light of the fact that it has a growing unemployment problem with one major industry making every effort to reduce its labour force.

As with a number of other of the special development areas, we considered that St. Helens' position no longer justified indefinite continuation of this grading. That part of the St. Helens travel-to-work area—Haydock—which used to be an intermediate area, has, however, been made a development area.

Concorde

56.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what is preventing the release for airline use of the remaining Concorde production aircraft.

Of the two unsold British assembled Concordes, one has been allocated to British Airways and is currently being modified to British Airways fleet standard. A decision on the other awaits the development by British Airways of financially acceptable proposals for its utilisation.

Post Office (Chairman)

57.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry, in view of the fact that the chairman of the Post Office refuses to reply to the letters he receives from hon. Members who make complaints on behalf of their constituents of failings in the postal services, on the grounds that he has a large volume of correspondence from, among others, hon. Members, whether to relieve him of this, he will dismiss him forthwith.

No. It is a matter for the chairman of the Post Office to decide how to deal with correspondence addressed to him. I understand that where correspondence from Members of Parliament concerns matters specifically relating to one of the constituent businesses, the chairman decides whether it is likely to be of most help if the reply comes directly from the business concerned, and, if he feels this is the case, he makes the appropriate arrangements.

Committee For Industrial Technology

asked the Secretary of State for Industry (1) what are the activities of the corrosion committee; how many people it employs; and what is its cost to public funds in the latest year for which figures are available;(2) what are the activities of the committee for materials handling; how many people it employs; and what is its cost to public funds in the latest year for which figures are available.

The committee for materials handling and the committee on corrosion were operating committees of the Committee for Industrial Technology—CFIT—with volunteer members drawn from the industrial and academic worlds. CFIT and its operating committees were disbanded at the end of its promotional campaign in November 1978. There were no people employed by the committees other than the secretariat provided by the Department. It is not practicable to give the expenditure of individual CFIT committees except at disproportionate cost, but the budgeted figure for CFIT for the financial year 1978–79 was £265,000.

Microelectronics (Training Programme)

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what representations he has received from the Trades Union Congress for a microelectronic training programme; and whether he will make a statement.

The Department of Industry has agreed to support a TUC microelectronic education and training programme covering some 65,000 union officers and representatives.

West Midlands Economic Planning Council

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what representations he has received from the West Midlands economic planning council following his statement on changes in regional industrial policy on 17 July.

British Shipbuilders (Corporate Plan)

asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will make a statement on the Government's plans for the future of the shipbuilding industry; and if he will place in the Library a copy of British Shipbuilders' latest corporate plan.

My hon. Friend the Minister of State has made a statement today. He has concluded that British Shipbuilders' corporate plan should not be published, but will be placing a copy of its report and accounts for 1978–79 in the Library later this week.

National Enterprise Board (Dundee)

asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will list the companies in Dundee in which the National Enterprise Board has a financial interest; and if he will list the number of people currently employed in these companies in Dundee.

Assisted Areas

asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he will publish the criteria used in deciding the changes in the boundaries and gradings of assisted areas announced on 17 July.

The criteria which we used are those statutorily prescribed in the Industry Act 1972:

"all the circumstances actual and expected including the state of employment and unemployment, population changes, migration and the objectives of regional policies."

Tent Manufacturing

asked the Secretary of State for Industry (1) whether his Department has received a copy of the statement issued by the tent manufacturing industry of the EEC which met in London on 17 January for the purpose of considering the serious crisis in the West European tent making industry; and, if so, if he will state his policy on the proposals;(2) what representations have been made to his Department by the United Kingdom tent manufacturing industry; what assistance has been granted to the industry; and if he will make a statement.

There is close and regular contact between the Department of Industry and the Made Up Textiles Association, the trade association which includes tent-making among the industries it represents. We are fully aware of the difficulties facing this sector.According to our records, in the last 18 months the industry has been offered some £35,000 in selective financial assistance and is likely to have benefited from regional development grants, although details are not readily available.A copy of the statement issued by the EEC tent makers after their meeting on 17 January was sent to the Department. Several issues are raised.As far as imports from low-cost sources are concerned, tents are dealt with under the regime applied by the Community to textiles and clothing generally under the multi-fibre arrangement—MFA—and associated measures.We are concerned to ensure that these arrangements are applied by the Community as effectively as possible for tents as for other textile and clothing products. However, there is no prospect of any special treatment for tents outside these arrangements, and it would not be practicable to renegotiate the bilateral agreements which have been reached with supplying countries. We shall, however, bear in mind the proposals in the statement when we come to consider the arrangements which will succeed the current multi-fibre arrangement when it expires at the end of 1981.On enlargement of the Community, the Greek accession treaty has now been signed. Spain and Portugal are not expected to join the Community until after the present multi-fibre arrangement runs out.The statement also refers to origin labelling for tents. While there is no universal origin marketing requirement under existing legislation, imported goods sold here under a United Kingdom mark or anything likely to be taken as such are already required to be accompanied by a conspicuous indication of their origin. However, the points made by the industry in the statement have been noted.On the question of Community rules of origin for tents, following detailed discussions with the industry new EEC non-preferential origin rules for sails and tents have been agreed in Brussels and it is expected that the new regulation will be published in the Official Journal shortly.

Regional Aid

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many factories or works in the Penistone constituency area have received, or are currently receiving, regional aid; what will be the effects of the recent policy direction of the Government to take this area out of intermediate status; and how many persons are having to lose their jobs because of this decision.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many regional development grants were made in Wales in the last four years on individual items of machinery or plant costing less than £500 and on individual buildings, extensions of buildings, adaptations or works costing less than £5,000; and what was their total value.

Waste Management Advisory Council

asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he will make a statement on the future of the Waste Management Advisory Council.

The Government's current planning envisages the continuation of the Waste Management Advisory Council.

Yorkshire And Humberside

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what effect his statement of 17 July and the accompanying written answer will have on the areas of Yorkshire and Humberside in terms of financial resources and jobs, with special reference to the textile and clothing manufacturing industries.

asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will quantify the effects, in financial and job terms, of his statement and the accompanying written answer of Tuesday 17 July and their effect on the engineering and metal industries of Yorkshire and Humberside.

It is not practicable to relate future expenditure on regional incentives or changes in such expenditure to levels of employment and unemployment in particular industries in individual English regions.

Public Expenditure (Wales)

asked the Secretary of State for Industry what estimate he has made of the savings in public expenditure in Wales as a result of the changes in regional industrial policy announced on 17 July.

Aid To Industry

asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many firms were in receipt of (a) regional development grant and (b) selective assistance to individual industries, firms and undertakings, in 1972–73, 1973–74, 1974–75, 1975–76, 1976–77, 1977–78 and 1978–79; and how many jobs are estimated to have been saved or created in each of these years by (i) payment of regional development grant and (ii) payment of selective assistance to individual industries, firms and undertakings.

pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 16 July], gave the following answer:Information on the number of firms obtaining regional development grant under part I of the Industry Act 1972 is not readily available. Such grants are not in any case linked to employment.The number of firms and undertakings receiving offers of assistance under part II of the Industry Act 1972 is as follows:

YearSection 7Section 8
1972–73111
1973–7479513
1974–75731127
1975–76766169
1976–77939546
1977–781,038836
1978–791,1161,948
Information is available on the estimated employment associated with projects supported under section 7 of the Industry Act 1972, but the proportion of these projects which would have gone ahead without assistance is not known. Under the new criteria for section 7, we shall ensure that assistance is provided only for those projects where it can be clearly demonstrated that it is needed for the project to go ahead and will provide more efficient and secure jobs.

Grants under section 8 of the Act are not directly linked to employment.

Home Department

Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what are his intentions with regard to the future of the criminal injuries compensation scheme; whether he has any plans for addditional help for the victims of crime; and if he will make a statement.

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Scotland and I have decided to publish a revised scheme based on the recommendations of the interdepartmental working party whose review of the criminal injuries compensation scheme was published last year. The revised scheme, which will come into effect on 1 October 1979, is set out below. The principal change to which I should call attention is the extension of the scheme to the victims of family violence. This will be on an experimental basis only in the first instance and the safeguards included to guard against the possibility of collusion or abuse will be reviewed in the light of experience. Other changes are mainly of a procedural nature and do not substantially alter the amount of compensation payable except that the limit on earnings which may be taken into account in assessing compensation has been raised.The Government accept the recommendation of the Royal Commission on civil liability and compensation for personal injury that the scheme should be made statutory but do not intend to introduce the relevant legislation until there has been sufficient experience of the revised scheme to enable any problems to be identified and solved. The Government also accept the Royal Commission's recommendation that compensation under the scheme should continue to be based on tort damages and will consider applying to the scheme any changes in tort damages which may be made as a result of the Royal Commission's other recommendations.The Government are determined to see that the victims of crime are not over- looked. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Social Services and I have jointly agreed to give grant aid towards the administrative costs of the National Association of Victims' support schemes, which will set standards for and offer help and advice to the many local victims' support schemes at present being set up throughout the country. In addition, I am about to issue revised guidance to magistrates' courts in England and Wales on lines recommended by the Magistrates' Association replacing previous Home Office advice which was to the effect that in order to give the offender a fresh start, compensation orders outstanding against young offenders sentenced to borstal training or to detention in a detention centre should not normally be enforced. The revised guidance will place the emphasis on continued effort to secure the enforcement of the order in the interests of the victim.

Revised Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme

Administration

1. The Compensation Scheme will be administered by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, which will be assisted by appropriate staff. Appointments to the board will be made by the Secretary of State* , after consultation with the Lord Chancellor and, where appropriate, the Lord Advocate. The chairman and members of the board, who will be legally qualified, will be appointed to serve for five years in the first instance, and their appointment will be renewable for such periods as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. The board members and chairman will not serve on the board beyond the age of 72, or after retirement from legal practice, whichever is the earlier, except that, where the Secretary of State considers it to be in the interests of the scheme to extend a particular appointment beyond the age of 72 or after retirement from legal practice, he may do so. The Secretary of State may, if he thinks fit, terminate a member's appointment on the ground of incapacity or misbehaviour.

2. The board will be provided with money through a grant-in-aid out of which payments for compensation awarded in accordance with the principles set out below will be made. Its net expenditure will fall on the Votes of the Home Office and the Scottish Home and Health Department.

3. The board will be entirely responsible for deciding what compensation should be paid in individual cases and their decisions will not be subject to appeal or to ministerial review. The general working of the scheme will, however, be kept under review by the Government and the board will submit annually to the Home Secretary and the Secretary of State for Scotland a full report on the operation of the scheme, together with their accounts. The report and accounts will be open to debate in Parliament.

* In practice this function will be exercised, as appropriate, by the Home Secretary or the Secretary of State for Scotland.

Scope of the Scheme

4. The board will entertain applications for ex gratia payments of compensation in any case where the applicant or, in the case of an application by a spouse or dependant—see paragraphs 15 and 16 below—the deceased, sustained in Great Britain, or on a British vessel, aircraft or hovercraft or on, under or above an installation in a designated area within the meaning of section 1 subsection (7) of the Continental Shelf Act 1964 or any waters within 500 metres of such an installation, or in a lighthouse off the coast of the United Kingdom, personal injury directly attributable

  • (a) to a crime of violence (including arson or poisoning) or
  • (b) to the apprehension or attempted apprehension of an offender or a suspected offender or to the prevention or attempted prevention of an offence or to the giving of help to any constable who is engaged in any such activity.
  • Applications for compensation will be entertained only if made within three years of the incident giving rise to the injury, except that the board may in exceptional cases waive this requirement. A decision by the chairman not to waive the time limit will be final. In considering for the purpose of this paragraph whether any act is a criminal act, any immunity at law of an offender, attributable to his youth or insanity or other condition, will be left out of account.

    5. Compensation will not be payable unless the board is satisfied that the injury was one for which the total amount of compensation payable after deduction of social security benefits, but before any other deductions under the scheme, would not be less than the minimum amount of compensation. This shall be £150 except for cases of violence within the family under paragraph 8 below, where the minimum shall be £500. The application of the minimum level shall not, however, affect the payment of funeral expenses under paragraph 15 below.

    6. The hoard may withhold or reduce compensation if it considers that:—

  • (a) the applicant has not taken, without delay, all reasonable steps to inform the police, or any other authority considered by the board to be appropriate for the purpose, of the circumstances of the injury and to co-operate with the police or other authority in bringing the offender to justice; or
  • (b) the applicant has failed to give all reasonable assistance to the board or other authority in connection with the application; or
  • (c) having regard to the conduct of the applicant before, during or after the events giving rise to the claim or to his character and way of life—and, in applications under paragraphs 15 and 16 below, to the character, conduct and way of life of the deceased and of the applicant—it is inappropriate that a full award, or any award at all, be granted.
  • Furthermore, compensation will not be payable:—

    (d) in the case of an application under paragraph 4(b) above where the injury was sustained accidentally, unless the board is satisfied that the applicant was at the time taking an exceptional risk which was justified in all the circumstances.

    7. In order to determine whether there was any responsibility, either because of provocation or otherwise, on the part of the victim, the board will scrutinise with particular care all applications in respect of sexual offences or other offences which arise out of a sexual relationship or where the relationship between the victim and the offender is such that there may be difficulty in establishing the facts or it seems possible that the offender might benefit from any award of compensation made to the applicant. In such cases the board will especially have regard to any delay that has occurred in submitting the application. Compensation will not be payable unless the board is satisfied that the offender will not benefit from an award.

    8. Where the victim and any person responsible for the injuries which are the subject of the application—whether that person actually inflicted them or not—were living in the same household at the time of the injuries as members of the same family, compensation will be paid only where:

  • (a) the person responsible has been prosecuted in connection with the offence, except where the board considers that there are practical, technical or other good reasons why a prosecution has not been brought; and
  • (b) the injury was one for which compensation—as assessed under paragraph 5 above—of not less than £500 would be awarded; and
  • (c) in the case of violence between adults in the family, the board is satisfied that the person responsible and the applicant stopped living in the same household before the application was made and seem unlikely to live together again; and
  • (d) in the case of an application under this paragraph by or on behalf of a minor, that is a person under 18 years of age, the board is satisfied that it would not be against the minor's interests to make a full or reduced award.
  • For the purposes of this paragraph, a man and a woman living together as husband and wife shall be treated as members of the same family.

    9. If in the opinion of the board it is in the interests of the applicant—whether or not a minor or a person under an incapacity—so to do, the board may pay the amount of any award to the trustee or trustees to hold on such trusts for the benefit of all or any of the following persons, namely, the applicant and any spouse, widow or widower, relatives and dependants of the applicant and with such provisions for their respective maintenance, education and benefit and with such powers and provisions for the investment and management of the fund and for the remuneration of the trustee or trustees as the board shall think fit. Subject to this the board will have a general discretion in any case in which they have awarded compensation to make special arrangements for its administration. In this paragraph "relatives" means all persons claiming descent from the applicant's grandparents and "dependants" means all persons who in the opinion of the board are dependant on him wholly or parially for the provision of the ordinary necessities of life.

    10. The board will consider applications for compensation arising out of acts of rape and other sexual offences both in respect of pain, suffering and shock and in respect of loss of earnings due to consequent pregnancy, and, where the victim is ineligible for a maternity grant under the national insurance scheme, in respect of the expenses of childbirth. Compensation will not be payable for the maintenance of any child born as a result of a sexual offence.

    11. Applications for compensation for personal injury attributable to traffic offences will be excluded from the scheme, except where such injury is due to a deliberate attempt to run the victim down.

    Basis of compensation

    12. Subject to the other provisions of this scheme, compensation will be assessed on the basis of common law damages and will normally take the form of a lump sum payment, although the board may make alternative arrangements in accordance with paragraph 9 above. More than one payment may be made where an applicant's eligibility for compensation has been established but a final award cannot be calculated in the first instance—for example, where only a provisional medical assessment can be given. In a case in which an interim award has been made, the board may decide to make a reduced award, increase any reduction already made or refuse to make any further payment at any stage before receiving notfication of acceptance of a final award.

    13. Although the board's decisions in a case will normally be final, it will have discretion to reconsider a case after a final award of compensation has been accepted where there has been such a serious change in the applicant's medical condition that injustice would occur if the original assessment of compensation were allowed to stand, or where the victim has since died as a result of his injuries. A case will not be reopened more than three years after the date of the final award unless the board is satisfied, on the basis of evidence presented with the application for reopening the case, that the renewed application can be considered without a need for extensive enquiries. A decision by the chairman that a case may not be re-opened will be final.

    14. Compensation will be limited as follows:

  • (a) the rate of net loss of earnings or earning capacity to be taken into account shall not exceed twice the gross average industrial earnings at the date of assessment— as published in the Department of Employment Gazette and adjusted as considered appropriate by the Board;
  • (b) there shall be no element comparable to exemplary or punitive damages.
  • 15. Where the victim has died in consequence of the injury, no compensation other than funeral expenses will be payable for the benefit of his estate, but the board will be able to entertain applications from his spouse and dependants. For this purpose, compensation will be payable, in accordance with the other provisions of this scheme, to any person entitled to claim under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 or any Act repealed by that Act or under the relevant Scottish law. For the avoidance of doubt "spouse" will not include for the purposes of this paragraph or paragraph 1 so-called common law wives or persons alleged to be married by habit and repute. Funeral expenses to an amount considered reasonable by the board will be paid in appropriate cases, even where the person bearing the cost of the funeral is otherwise ineligible to claim under this scheme. Applications may be made under this paragraph where the victim has died from his injuries even if an award has been made to the victim in his lifetime. Such cases will be subject to the conditions set out in paragraph 13 for the re-opening of cases and compensation payable to the applicant will be reduced by the amount paid to the victim.

    16. Where the victim has died otherwise than in consequence of the injury, the board may make an award in respect of loss of wages, expenses and liabilities incurred before death as a result of the injury whether or not application for compensation in respect of the injury has been made before the death.

    17. Compensation will be payable for loss of or damage to clothing and other personal adjuncts arising from the injury. Personal adjuncts do not include jewellery, watches or rings lost or damaged, whether at the time of the offence or afterwards or in the course of medical or other treatment arising from the offence. Save as aforesaid, compensation will not be payable for loss of or damage to property.

    18. The cost of private medical treatment will be payable by the board only if the board considers that, in all the circumstances, both the private treatment and the cost of it are reasonable.

    19. Compensation will be reduced by the full value of any present or future entitlement to:

  • (a) United Kingdom social security benefits
  • (b) compensation awards under the Criminal Injuries (Compensation) (Northern Ireland) Order 1977
  • (c) social security benefits, compensation awards or similar payments whatsoever from the funds of other countries, or
  • (d) payments under insurance arrangements except as excluded below
  • which may accrue, as a result of the injury or death, to the benefit of the person to whom the award is made. In assessing this entitlement, account will be taken of any income

    tax liability likely to reduce the value of such benefits and, in the case of an application under paragraph 15, the value of such benefits will not be reduced to take account of prospects of remarriage. If, in the opinion of the board, an applicant may be eligible for any such benefits the board may refuse to make an award until the applicant has taken such steps as the board considers reasonable to claim them. Subject to paragraph 18 above, the board will disregard moneys paid or payable to the victim or his dependants as a result of or in consequence of insurance personally effected, paid or and maintained by the personal income of the victim or, in the case of a person under the age of 18, by his parent.

    20. Where the victim is alive compensation will be reduced to take account of any pension accruing as a result of the injury. Where the victim has died in consequence of the injury, and any pension is payable for the benefit of the person to whom the award is made as a result of the death of the victim, the compensation will similarly be reduced to take account of the value of that pension. Where such pensions are taxable, one-half of their value will be deducted; where they are not taxable, for example where a lump sum payment not subject to income tax is made, they will be deducted in full. For the purposes of this paragraph, "pension" means any payment payable as a result of the injury or death, in pursuance of pension or other rights whatsoever connected with the victim's employment, and includes any gratuity of that kind and similar benefits payable under insurance policies paid for by employers. Pension rights accruing solely as a result of payments by the victim or a dependant will be disregarded.

    21. When a civil court has given judgment providing for payment of damages or a claim for damages has been settled on terms providing for payment of money, or when payment of compensation has been ordered by a criminal court, in respect of personal injuries, compensation by the board in respect of the same injuries will be reduced by the amount of any payment received under such an order or settlement. When a civil court has assessed damages, as opposed to giving judgment for damages agreed by the parties, but the person entitled to such damages has not yet received the full sum awarded, he will not be precluded from applying to the board, but the board's assessment of compensation will not exceed the sum assessed by the court. Furthermore, a person who is compensated by the board will be required to undertake to repay them from any damages, settlement or compensation he may subsequently obtain in respect of his injuries. In arriving at its assessment of compensation the board will not be bound by any finding of contributory negligence by any court, but will be entirely bound by the terms of the scheme.

    Procedure for determining applications

    22. Every application will be made to the board in writing as soon as possible after the event on a form obtainable from the board's office. The initial decision on the amount of any compensation awarded will be taken by one member of the board and and where an award is made the applicant will be given a breakdown of the assessment of compensation, except where the board considers this inappropriate, and where an award is refused or reduced reasons for the decision will be given. If the applicant is not satisfied with the decision, he will be entitled to a hearing before three members of the board other than the member who made the initial decision. An application for a hearing must be made within three months of notification of the initial decision; however the board may waive this time limit where an extension is requested with good reason within the three month period, or where it is otherwise in the interests of justice to do so. A decision by the chairman not to waive the time limit will be final. It will also be open to the single member where he considers that he cannot make a just and proper decision himself, to refer the application to three other members of the board for a hearing. An applicant will have no title to an award offered until the board has received notification in writing that he accepts it.

    23. It will be for the applicant to make out his case at the hearing, and where appropriate this will extend to satisfying the board that compensation should not be withheld or reduced under the terms of paragraph 6 or paragraph 8. The applicant and a member of the board's staff will be able to call, examine and cross-examine witnesses. The board will be entitled to take into account any relevant hearsay, opinion or written evidence, whether or not the author gives oral evidence at the hearing. The board will reach its decision solely in the light of the evidence brought out at the hearing, and all the information and evidence made available to the board members will be made available to the applicant at, if not before, the hearing. While it will be open to the applicant to bring a friend or legal adviser to assist him in putting his case, the board will not pay the costs of legal representation. It will, however, have discretion to pay the expenses of the applicant and witnesses at a hearing. If one of the three designated members is unable to take part in a hearing, the hearing may proceed, if the applicant consents, with two members.

    24. Procedure at hearings will be as informal as is consistent with the proper determination of applications, and hearings will in general be in private. The board will have discretion to permit observers, such as representatives of the press, radio, and television, to attend hearings provided that written undertakings are given that the anonymity of the applicant and other parties will not in any way be infringed by subsequent reporting. The board will have power to publish information about its decisions in individual cases; this power will be limited only by the need to preserve the anonymity of applicants and other parties.

    Implementation

    25. The provisions of this scheme will take effect from 1 October 1979. Applications in respect of injuries incurred on or after 1 October 1979 will be dealt with under the terms

    of this scheme. Applications in respect of injuries incurred before that date will be dealt with under the terms of the scheme which came into operation on 21 May 1969, except that after 31 December 1979 applications relating to injuries incurred more than three years previously will be entertained only where the board considers it appropriate exceptionally to waive this time limit. Where a decision by a single member in respect of an injury incurred before 1 October 1979:

  • (a) is notified after that date, the time limit of three months under the terms of paragraph 22 of this scheme will apply to any application for a hearing;
  • (b) was notified, but not accepted, before that date, an application for a hearing will not be entertained after 31 December 1979 except where the board considers there is a good reason to extend this time limit.
  • Cases in respect of injuries incurred before 1 October 1979 may be reopened, subject to the conditions set out in paragraphs 13 and 15 of this scheme, for review under the terms of the scheme which came into operation in May 1969. A decision by the chairman not to waive or extend the time limits referred to in this paragraph will be final.

    Chronic Alcoholics

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what new steps he plans to announce in services to divert chronic alcoholics from the penal system to community and treatment facilities.

    The treatment of chronic alcoholic offenders in the penal system and outside is being kept under review in discussions between the Home Office and the Department of Health and Social Security. It would be premature to announce any new steps before we have a better understanding of the effect of existing facilities.

    Drunkenness

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has to designate further police districts, in addition to those in Leeds and Manchester, as areas in which the police may divert habitual drunken offenders from the courts to treatment centres.

    None at present: consideration will be given to the desirability of further designations in the light of research currently being undertaken in Leeds and Manchester.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the total number of persons convicted of public drunkenness offences—excluding offences connected with driving—for the years 1958, 1963, 1965, 1969, 1973 and 1978.

    The information is published annually in the "Criminal Statistics, England and Wales" (table 1(a) of the volume for 1977, Cmnd. 7289). Information for 1978 is not yet available.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the total number of persons committed to prison in default of fines imposed by the courts for drunkenness offences during the year ended 31 December 1978.

    The information requested will be published shortly in "Prison Statistics: England and Wales 1978".

    Prisoners (Letters)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department on how many occasions in the last year for which figures are available letters to or from prisoners have been referred to headquarters for a decision on whether or not they can be allowed.

    The information requested is not readily available and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.

    Juvenile Offenders

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what proposals he has to introduce more detention centres for the short-term treatment of juvenile offenders.

    We have no present plans to introduce additional detention centres, but we are considering introducing a more vigorous regime in certain of the existing centres.

    Prisoners (Petitions)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Deparment if he will specify the topics on which prisoners petitioned his Department in the last year for which figures are available.

    The most recent information on the topics on which prisoners petition is contained in the results of a survey carried out in the quarter ended 31 December 1977, under 55 different subject headings. The main topics, on each of which over 50 petitions were received, were as follows:

    • Transfer to another prison.
    • Parole.
    • Punishment awards.
    • Production at courts etc.
    • Medical matters.
    • Personal property.
    • Calculation of sentence.

    Northern Ireland

    Natural Gas Pipeline

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what conclusions the Government have reached on the proposal to construct a natural gas pipeline from Great Britain to Northern Ireland; and whether he will make a statement.

    The Government have reviewed the case for a natural gas pipeline from Great Britain to Northern Ireland. They have concluded that public expenditure in the region of £100 million at present-day prices to provide a pipeline and the ancillary works in Northern Ireland would not be justified in terms of additional security of energy supply, the price at which natural gas could be economically provided or the total number of consumers who might hope to benefit. This conclusion has been reached in the context of a wide-ranging review of energy policy for Northern Ireland. I have today placed in the Library a statement which sets out more fully the Government's approach to this problem and their proposals for action.

    Harland And Wolff Ltd

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement about the Government's proposals for the future of Harland and Wolff Limited.

    Plans for Harland and Wolff Limited have been formulated in parallel with those for British Shipbuilders announced in the House today by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Department of Industry.Harland and Wolff faces the same severely depressed market prospects as the rest of the United Kingdom shipbuilding industry. While the present order book consists of eight ships, the last of which is due for delivery in the spring of 1981, some parts of the yard will run out of work well before this if no new orders are obtained. Consequently, the process of contraction at the yard may well have to continue further.New orders cannot be won, even at a subsidised price, unless delivery dates can be met. I am concerned to learn that production targets at Harland and Wolff have recently been missed and that, for a variety of reasons, productivity generally has been slipping. This has been reflected in heavy trading losses which the Government have met, but cannot continue to meet indefinitely.I feel confident that it should be possible, given an all-out effort by all concerned, to achieve improved efficiency and enable the yard to remain in operation. The Government have therefore decided to continue financial support of the company and to make proposals to the EEC Commission for an intervention fund for subsidies on new orders over the next two years if they can be won. Strict limits will, however, be imposed on the funding of losses and other expenditure by the company. The overall limit for the current financial year will be £22 million. The company must show early and marked improvements in performance if any new orders are to be won and if there is to be a chance of survival in the longer run.Some further decline in the shipbuilding work force is inevitable. As in Great Britain, the Government have extended the special redundancy payments scheme to the full period authorised under the Shipbuilding Redundancy Payments Act. It is, of course, open to the company to minimise the decline in overall employment by engaging in diversification wherever possible, and I have been glad to see that some initial progress has already been made in this direction.

    The way ahead is difficult and, while the Government have their part to play, the real challenge is now upon every man at the yard to strive to ensure its survival.

    Police Complaints Board

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland when the 1978 annual report of the Police Complaints Board for Northern Ireland will be published.

    The report is being laid before Parliament and published today.

    Director Of Public Prosecutions

    65.

    asked the Attorney-General whether he is satisfied with the establishment and staffing of the Department of the Director of Public Prosecutions.

    No. The Director's staff is still under strength and has difficulty in maintaining the necessary standards of service and efficiency both in respect of his advisory and prosecution functions in the face of a continuing growth in the number of cases of both types submitted to him. However, the Director's department has been exempted from the temporary ban on recruitment and he is seeking to recruit more staff.

    Mr James Taylor

    61.

    asked the Attorney-General if he will make a statement on the failure of the Director of Public Prosecutions to prosecute those responsible for the killing of Mr. James Taylor at Coagh on 30 September 1978.

    Upon consideration of the evidence reported by the Chief Constable in relation to the fatal shooting of Noel Samuel James Taylor by a soldier on 30 September 1978 the Director concluded that the evidence did not warrant the institution of any criminal proceedings in respect of the fatal shooting of Mr. Taylor. Accordingly a direction of "no prosecution" was given on 18 April 1979.My predecessor agreed with this conclusion, and I have since read the papers and also agree with the Director's decision.Writs claiming damages have been issued against the Ministry of Defence by Margaret Taylor, the widow, and William Robert Devenny, William George Hamilton McCollum and Given Hamilton Shuter, who were involved in the incident. Pleadings have now been closed but notices of trial have not yet been served.I would like to add that the accounts of this incident put out by the press do not tell the whole story, but in view of the forthcoming inquest and High Court actions I do not feel it right to go into the details of the incident.

    Members' Correspondence

    66.

    asked the Attorney-General when he expects to provide the information further to his answer to the hon. Member for Holborn and St. Pancras South on 3 July.

    I expect to be in a position to write to the hon. Member later this week.

    Parliamentary Privilege

    67.

    asked the Attorney-General if he will bring forward proposals to remove the absolute privilege attaching to statements in either House for the purpose of the law of defamation, and to replace it with qualified privilege.

    Regina V Deakin

    68.

    asked the Attorney-General what further inquiries he is making into the apparently contradictory statement regarding what transpired in discussions between the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions and a solicitor for Mr. Bessell, a witness in the case of Regina v. Deakin and others, concerning a proposed agreement between Mr. Bessell and the Sunday Telegraph concerning a book; and whether he will make a statement.

    None. No. I refer the right hon. and learned Member to the written answer I gave to my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Blackpool North (Mr. Miscampbell) on 18 July.

    asked the Attorney-General whether, in the light of the judge's comments at the recent Thorpe trial, he will refer to the Director of Public Prosecutions with a view to prosecution for a charge of perjury the evidence of Mr Peter Bessell.

    A transcript of the proceedings to which the hon. Member refers has not been prepared but I am not aware of any evidence that would justify my making such a reference nor has the learned judge himself made one, as he was entitled to do.

    Extradition Proceedings

    69.

    asked the Attorney-General if he will instruct the Director of Public Prosecutions not to represent foreign Governments in extradition proceedings in the United Kingdom when the issue involved is one which may ultimately have to be determined on political grounds by the Secretary of State for the Home Department.

    A growing number of agreements on extradition between Her Majesty's Government and foreign Governments make provision, on a reciprocal basis, for the Director to represent the foreign Government on an application made to this country. The arrangements normally allow the Director to exercise his discretion whether to act himself for the applicant or pass the papers to others. It is not necessary for me to give any directions to the Director as the policy he pursues is that if he has any doubts about the propriety of his acting he will pass the papers to a private solicitor to act on behalf of the foreign Government.

    Witnesses' Statements (Purchase)

    asked the Attorney-General whether, in view of the recent non-observance of the Press Council's declaration of principle concerning the buying of witnesses' statements, he will now reconsider his view that the matter be left in the first instance to the Press Council for consideration; whether he will now introduce legislation; and if he adheres to his view that the Press Council should consider the matter, how much time he intends to allow it.

    I do not know to what specific matter the right hon. and learned Member is making reference but I have not changed the views I have already expressed in the House on the most appropriate approach to the only such current matter of which I have knowledge. It is not the Government's intention, at the present time, to introduce legislation. I do not propose to set a time limit; I have been assured by the Press Council that it is pursuing its inquiries as a matter of urgency.

    Regina V Rastall (Cost)

    asked the Attorney-General what was the approximate cost to the public funds of the prosecution case brought against Mr. Richard Rastall and two others which was stopped and the accused acquitted after four days' trial at the Leeds county court sitting at Knaresborough in June.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 25 June 1979], gave the following answer:I have now ascertained that the total taxed costs of the proceedings against all three accused was £4,695. It is not possible to apportion these costs between them. Following the acquittal of Mr. Rastall by the direction of the judge, the proceedings continued against the other two accused and ended in convictions after a trial lasting more than two weeks.

    Civil Service

    Professional And Technical Officers (Pay)

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service whether acceptance by professional and technical officers of salary awards below those granted to administrative and executive officers would involve the former groups in reductions of conditions of service with regard to annual leave, subsistence allowances, accommodation at sea and overtime payments in so far as those are established by comparability of grades between professional and technical officers and administrative and executive officers.

    The level of leave entitlement for a civil servant has been calculated by reference to a grade's relationship with various "key" administration group grades. However, in a letter of 2 May 1979 to the national staff side the CSD pointed out that for the time being this "key grade" system was frozen pending review. Thus at present acceptance of the CSD's offer for the grades concerned would entail no change in any P and T officer's leave entitlement.As far as overtime conditions are concerned the CSD offer would not worsen the position of the P and T staff. Subsistence levels—and eligibility for first-class travel and other similar conditions of service—are also based on key grades. The CSD policy has been, and is, to assess whether any change is likely to be of an enduring nature before any change is made to the conditions of grades of staff who are apparently affected. In the past this has meant that least two pay policy-free years have elapsed before a change is made. The current CSD offer will therefore not affect any of these conditions of service this year.

    Pay Research Unit

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service how the pay research unit takes account of the fact that some civil servants receive overtime pay which is not available in comparable occupations in the private sector.

    No account is taken by the pay research unit of overtime pay when collecting evidence on which the basic pay of civil servants is determined. The Civil Service grades which are eligible to receive overtime pay correspond broadly to salary levels at which overtime is generally paid outside the Service.

    Dispersal

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service if he will list the units in the proposed Civil Service dispersal programme which are at present being reviewed by Department, the number of posts, the present location, the new location and the proposed date when the move would be completed.

    DepartmentApprox. No. of postsReceiving locationBuildings ready for occupation
    Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food1,250Merseyside1983–84
    Civil Service Department500Norwich1982–83
    Customs and Excise500Southend1977–78 to 1984–85+
    Ministry of Defence4,250Cardiff1983–84
    5,000Glasgow1983–84 to 1987–88
    Department of Education:
    Agricultural Research Council190Merseyside1983–84
    Department of Employment:
    Health and Safety Executive1,000MerseysideDates not yet determined
    Manpower Services Commission1,900Sheffield1979–80, 1981–82+
    Department of the Environment:
    Council for Small Industries in Rural Areas140Salisbury1979–80+
    Property Services Agency3,000Teesside1983–84 to 1984–85
    1,000Regional OfficesVarious dates up to 1984–85
    Exports Credits Guarantee Department800Cardiff1976–77+ 1979–80
    Foreign and Commonwealth Office500Merseyside1983–84
    Overseas Development Administration650East Kilbride1980–81
    Directorate of Overseas Surveys350Glasgow AreaDates not yet determined
    Department of Health and Social Security500Newcastle1977–78+
    980Blackpool1978–79, 1982–83+
    Home Office1,000Merseyside1981–82 to 1983–84
    Inland Revenue1,260Not identifiedDates not yet determined
    Office of Population Censuses and Surveys500Southport1981–82+
    Stationery Office, HM380Norwich1978–79+
    Departments of Trade and Industry600Cardiff/Newport1978–79 to 1981–82+
    Laboratory of the Government Chemist360West Cumbria1984–85

    Notes:

    +indicates those dispersals in progress.

    All the posts referred to above are scheduled to be dispersed from the London area except 3,880 from the Ministry of Defence which it is proposed be dispersed from the following locations:

    a.Bath850
    b.Didcot175
    c.Winchester215
    d.Various locations in the South from Army Pay, Manning and Record Office740
    e.Common Services at locations a. to d.270
    f.Ashton-under-Lyne150
    g.Droitwich55
    h.Harrogate1,170
    i.Leeds70
    j.Common Services at locations f. to i.185

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service if he has any plans to hold an urgent meeting with the Society of Civil and Public Servants concerning the dispersal of 7,000 jobs to Scotland.

    I met a deputation representing the Society of Civil and Public Servants at national level on 10 July to

    The information is as follows:discuss the Government's review of me dispersal programme.

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service when a positive decision will be taken on the dispersal of the 7,000 Civil Service jobs from London to Glasgow and East Kilbride.

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service (1) when he expects to be able to make a statement on his plans for the Exchange station site in Liverpool, intended for the dispersal of civil servants to Merseyside;(2) when he expects to be able to make a statement on the policy of Her Majesty's Government concerning the dispersal of Civil Service jobs to Merseyside.

    I refer my hon. Friend and the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the right hon. Member for Sheffield, Park (Mr. Mulley) on 20 July that the Government hope to make an announcement before the end of July.

    Expenditure

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service (1) when he expects to be able to announce the outcome of his review of the 10 per cent., 15 per cent. and 20 per cent. options for cuts in Civil Service expenditure;(2) if he will give an assurance that the review of 10 per cent., 15 per cent., and 20 per cent. options for cuts in Civil Service expenditure will not lead to redundancies.

    As I indicated to the hon. Member on 18 July—[Vol. 970, c. 1775]—a statement will be made in the autumn.No undertakings can be given about redundancy in the context of this exercise. However, the aim will be to proceed by natural wastage as far as possible.

    Administrative Efficiency (Review)

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service when he expects the review being carried out by Sir Derek Rayner into administrative efficiency and the elimination of waste to be completed; and if he will publish its findings and recommendations.

    My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister has asked Sir Derek Rayner to assist her and other Ministers in promoting efficiency and eliminating waste. No term has been set on his appointment. His assignment does not consist of a single review; he will however, make reports to Ministers from time to time and some of these may be published.

    Institution Of Professional Civil Servants (Dispute)

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service, pursuant to his reply on 9 July to the hon. Member for Poole (Mr. Ward), if he will publish the correspondence between his Department and the Institution of Professional Civil Servants relating to the pay of principal scientific officers and senior scientific officers.

    The hon. Member will know that agreement has now been reached between my Department and the Institution of Professional Civil Servants on the pay of the scientific Civil Service. I have arranged for copies of the correspondence referred to in my reply of 9 July 1979, to my hon. Friend the Member for Poole (Mr. Ward) to be placed in the Library together with copies of the correspondence embodying the agreement.

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service what steps he is taking to ensure that, following the resumption of work at St. Stephen's Parliamentary Press, the members of the Institution of Professional Civil Servants who were involved in the recent dispute shall not be entitled to overtime payments in respect of the arrears of work now to be completed.

    The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office will be ensuring that the minimum amount of overtime will be worked at the St. Stephen's Parliamentary Press, consistent with the need to complete the outstanding work within a reasonable time.

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service if his Department has consulted the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service in order to resolve the current dispute with the Institution of Professional Civil Servants.

    Official Publications

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service what steps he intends to take to improve services given by Her Majesty's Stationery Office and the Government bookshop to those who wish to purchase official publications including Acts of Parliament.

    The services given are as good as the present distribution arrangements allow. Her Majesty's Stationery Office is already implementing plans for the improvement of these arrangements; but the relocation of the London warehouse, the change in the operating procedures and the staff negotiations involved mean that there must inevitably be a considerable delay in achieving the improvement which I recognise as essential.

    "The Civil Service Year Book"

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service whether he will arrange a reprint of "The Civil Service Year Book" immediately to reflect the change of Government and Ministers, or at least a corrective addendum thereto.

    "The Civil Service Year Book", abridged and updated edition, mid-1979 is due to be published by Her Majesty's Stationery Office next month and will reflect the change of Government and Ministers.

    Cash Limits

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service by how much the overall cash limit for the Civil Service for 1978–79 has been reduced by the 3 per cent. reduction in the pay component announced in May;(2) if he will give an assurance that the 3 per cent. reduction in the pay component of the Civil Service cash limit will not lead to redundancies.

    The revised cash limits for 1979–80 published on 26 June 1979 included reductions of £105 million in the Civil Service pay component before adjustment was made to accommodate the costs of the non-industrial pay settlement.It is not envisaged that any redundancies will result from this exercise.

    Bingham Report

    asked the Attorney-General whether the Director of Public Prosecutions has completed consideration of the Bingham report; and if he will make a statement.

    Trade

    Company Returns

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade in view of the fact that many limited companies are failing to file annual returns or supplying accounts, and that action against them by his Department only appears to follow complaints from consumers or third parties, if he will make a statement of his policy on this matter.

    Enforcement action is not limited to cases in which there have been complaints. In the last 12 months, about 12,000 reminder letters were issued following complaints and about 200,000 because records indicated that returns or accounts were overdue. In the same period, 613 directors were convicted on charges involving default: fines and costs imposed exceeded £155,000.

    National Quality Strategy

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade what were the results of the inquiry into a national strategy for quality; and whether it is his intention to create a British quality board.

    Some 360 organisations and individuals have replied to the consultation document—"A National Strategy for Quality". As the replies are still being analysed I am not yet in a position to make a statement.

    Weights And Measures

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade what is the present delay between the presentation of a new pattern for weights and measures equipment and its approval; and what effect on the delay will flow from the public expenditure reductions and the moratorium on recruitment of civil servants.

    The delay before examination starts of new patterns of weighing or measuring equipment is currently averaging 16 months, within a range of from 12 to 19 months. Public expenditure reductions are unlikely to affect the delay period which arises mainly from a shortage of engineers. The moratorium on recruitment does not apply in this sector and we are continuing to seek to recruit staff to fill the vacancies. I hope that the new pay scales, when agreed, will assist.

    Tent Manufacturing

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade whether his Department has received a copy of the statement issued by the tent manufacturing industries of the EEC which met in London on 17 January 1978 for the purpose of considering the serious crisis in the West European tent making industry; and, if so, if he will state his policy on the proposals.

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade what was the quantity and the value of tents wholly or predominantly of cotton or other than cotton imported into the United Kingdom during the latest 12 months for which figures are available.

    Details of imports of cotton tents and of tents of other textile materials are published against tariff headings 6204 2300 under SITC(Rev 2) Item 658.21—and 6204 7300—under SITC(Rev 2) Item 658.29—respectively, in table IV of the monthly issues of the "Overseas Trade Statistics of the United Kingdom", copies of which are in the House of Commons Library.

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade what representations have been made to his Department by the tent manufacturing industry in the United Kingdom about the penetration of the home market by low-cost products from the Far East, especially South Korea.

    My Department received representations from one manufacturer about tents from South Korea in July and September 1978.

    General Agreement On Tariffs And Trade

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade when he expects the United States of America to ratify the package agreed in the recent general agreement on tariffs and trade regulations.

    The Trade Agreements Bill 1979 to incorporate the results of the MTN agreements into United States law is currently before Congress. If it is approved, as we hope, we can expect the United States to be prepared to signify its acceptance of the MTN package, by signature towards the end of the year, in time for the main agreements to come into effect on 1 January 1980.

    Third London Airport

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade (1) when the economic and environmental appraisals which will indicate where the third London airport is to be located will be available;(2) on what basis the economic and environmental appraisals of the siting of the proposed third London airport are to be made; and if he will make a statement.

    On 18 May the study group on South-East airports issued a progress report on the selection of sites for a third London airport, which explained the way in which it is carrying out its work. I expect to receive the study group's final report in the autumn.

    Civil Aviation Policy

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade whether paragraph 21 of the guidance given to the Civil Aviation Authority in the White Paper "Future Civil Aviation Policy", Cmnd. 6400, still applies; and whether in view of paragraph 78 of the Authority's decision dated 18 May 1978 on application 1A/20196, he will give a more precise indication of the weight that the Authority should give to it.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 19 July 1979; Vol. 788, c. 970], gave the following information:Since no changes have been made in guidance given to the Authority under section 3 of the Civil Aviation Act 1971, paragraph 21 still has effect. I am considering what changes, if any, should be made to the guidance.

    Scotch Whisky

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade what is the average duty on a bottle of Scotch whisky imported into the United States of America; and in the absence of any other tax changes by how much that duty would be reduced by the elimination of the wine gallon method of assessment.

    A 75 cl bottle of Scotch whisky imported into the United States of America at 86·4° US—74·6° Sykes—carries a customs duty of 10 cents and internal revenue tax of $2·10; a total of $2·20. Abolition of WGA would reduce the total tax to $1·90–86·4 per cent. of $2·20—a saving of 30 cents.

    Scotland

    Uranium (Orkney Islands)

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland (1), outside the Stromness area of the Orkney Islands, whether there are any other locations in the United Kingdom where the uranium content of the ore is more than 0·2 per cent. and above;(2) what is the length and width of the uranium corridor in the Orkney Islands and the grade of agricultural land; and whether the uranium ores extend on to the continental shelf;(3) at what depth is the uranium ore in the Stromness area; and what are the types of mineralisation and the strengths of radiation emitted;(4) how many mines will be required for exploiting uranium in the Stromness area; where waste materials would be located; and how radon gas would be disposed of and water pollution;(5) what is his estimate of the uranium reserves on the Orkney Islands.

    These questions relate to the policy on uranium set out in the Orkney structure plan which is at present before my right hon. Friend, and the issues raised by my hon. Friend were discussed during an examination in public of the plan earlier this year. The report of the examination, which has recently come to my right hon. Friend, will be published in due course along with his decision on the structure plan.

    Cancer (Orkney Islands)

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether the incidence of cancer on the Orkney Islands differs from the national average.

    The average annual incidence of cancer in males in Scotland between 1974 and 1977 was 359 per 100,000 population and in Orkney 409 per 100,000 population; when adjustment is made to allow for differences in the age structure between Orkney and Scotland—normal age standardisation—the average annual incidence for males in Orkney falls to 323 per 100,000. For females the average incidence over the same period was 344 for Scotland and 375 for Orkney; with the adjustment for age the Orkney rate becomes 351.

    Scottish Development Agency

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland when he proposes to publish details of the new guidelines for the Scottish Development Agency.

    As soon as current consultations with the Agency have been completed.

    Employment

    Retraining

    59.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what new plans he has for Government encouragement of retraining in industry.

    I am informed by the Manpower Services Commission that encouragement of adult retraining in industry is one of the aims of the Commission's "Training for Skills" programme which is administered through the industrial training boards and other national training bodies. Government funds are available where needed to meet key objectives.

    Intermediate Areas

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) how many jobs in the development and special development areas in the United Kingdom, redesignated as intermediate areas in the Secretary of State for Industry's statement of 17 July, are currently being supported under the following provisions; special temporary employment programme, temporary short-time working compensation scheme and small firms employment subsidy, respectively;(2) how many jobs in the development and special development areas in Cumbria, redesignated as intermediate areas in the Secretary of State for Industry's statement of 17 July, are currently being supported under the following provisions: special temporary employment programme, temporary short-time working compensation scheme and small firms employment subsidy, respectively;(3) how many jobs in the development and special development areas in the Northern region, redesignated as intermediate areas in the Secretary of State for Industry's statement of 17 July, are currently being supported under the following provisions: special temporary employment programme, temporary short-time working compensation scheme and small firms employment subsidy, respectively.

    Assisted Areas

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will publish the current unemployment levels for each employment office area and travel-to-work area which has had its assisted area status reduced or removed as a result of the regional review announced on 17 July; and if he will also relate those levels to the average for Great Britain, taking that average as 100.

    Small Firms Employment Subsidy

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list those travel-to-work areas from which the small firms employment subsidy will be or has been withdrawn.

    Employment Protection

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what representations he has had on the working of schedule 11 to the Employment Protection Act; whether he has any plans to amend this schedule; and if he will make a statement.

    My right hon. Friend has received representations about schedule 11 to the Employment Protection Act 1975 from the CBI and from individual employers and employers' associations. The schedule is being considered as part of the Government's general review of industrial relations legislation.

    Unions (Membership)

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will seek to amend the law to strengthen the protection which may be offered by industrial tribunals to persons harassed by their former unions when they wish to join another union recognised by their management, in the light of the action taken by the National Union of Journalists against Mr. Peter Brown to seek to prevent him from joining the Institute of Journalists.

    The Government's working paper on proposed changes in the law on the closed shop contains a number of proposals which may be of assistance to individuals in circumstances of this kind. Copies of the working paper, on which consultations are now taking place, were deposited in the Library on 9 July.

    Tent Manufacturing

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many persons are employed by the United Kingdom tent manufacturing industry directly and how many by fabric manufacturers supplying the industry; and what redundancies have occurred during the last 12 months.

    Youth Opportunities

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will provide his estimate of the net cost per person per week of employing young people in community industry after taking into account the savings in unemployment and other benefits.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 19 July 1979; Vol. 970, c. 800], gave the following answer:I am informed by the Manpower Services Commission that the estimated net cost per young person per week of community industry was estimated to be less than £25 during 1978–79. This represents about half of the latest estimate of the average gross cost of £52.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will define precisely how savings will be made in the youth opportunities programme by shifting provision marginally towards less expensive opportunities.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 19 July 1979; Vol. 970, c. 801], gave the following answer:I am informed by the Manpower Services Commission that in the first three months of 1979–80 about 65 per cent. of entrants to the youth opportunities programme went into work experience on employers premises—WEEP—which is less expensive than most of the other training available in the programme. This compares with a forecast of about 52 per cent. contained in area plans.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will provide an analysis of the youth opportunities programme places providing work experience on employer's premises, by standard industrial classification.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 19 July 1979; Vol. 970, c. 801], gave the following answer:I am informed by the Manpower Services Commission that the new places approved during 1978–79 on schemes providing work experience on employers' premises—WEEP—came from the private sector—85 per cent.—the public sector—13 per cent.—and voluntary and charitable organisations—2 per cent. An analysis of these places by standard industrial classification is not available but the table below gives a broad analysis of the private sector places only:

    Percentage of private sector WEEP places approved from April 1978 to March 1979
    Industrial Classification
    Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing8
    Engineering and Metal Manufacture12
    Other Manufacturing14
    Construction and Mining7
    Distributive Trades31
    Financial and Professional Services5
    Miscellaneous Services23
    All Private Sector WEEP100

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many young people who left school at Easter or summer 1978 have (a) not been offered a place on the youth opportunities pro- gramme and (b) been refused a place on the youth opportunities programme.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 19 July 1979; Vol. 970, c. 801], gave the following answer:I am informed by the Manpower Services Commission that on 5 April 1979, the date of the concluding count of progress towards the Easter undertaking, there remained about 1,600 unemployed 1978 school leavers who had not had the chance of an opportunity under the youth opportunities programme and for whom an offer would have been appropriate. This represented less than 1 per cent. of the 200,000 unemployed school leavers in August 1978 who were potentially covered by the undertaking.It was estimated that about 40 per cent. of the remaining group of 1,600 young people had been considered by sponsors for one or more opportunities and had been turned down.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will provide the best available estimate of the net cost per person per week of each of the component elements of the youth opportunities programme, after taking into account savings in social security and other benefits.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 19 July 1979; Vol. 970, c. 801], gave the following answer:I am informed by the Manpower Services Commission that reliable estimates of the net cost per person per week of the different elements of the youth opportunities programme cannot be made. Taking the programme as a whole, the estimated average net cost per person per week during the second half of 1978–79 was £20 to £25. Estimates of the average gross cost per person per week during that period of the different elements of the programme are given in the table below:

    Estimated average gross cost (£) per person per week during second half of 1978–79
    Type of YOP Scheme
    Work Experience on Employers' Premises21
    Project-based Work Experience40
    Training Workshops48
    Community Service41
    Employment Induction Courses56
    Short Industrial Courses60
    Other Courses86

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will provide whatever information is available on how many people who have been employed under the special temporary employment programme have progressed into permanent employment.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 19 July 1979; Vol. 970, c. 801], gave the following answer:I am informed by the Manpower Services Commission that a survey of people's employment after leaving the programme is currently being made, but no information is yet available.

    Employment Agencies

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many prosecutions have been brought by his Department for offences against employment agency legislation; what is the total of fines which have been imposed; and if he will make a statement.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 20 July 1979], gave the following answer:Prosecutions under the Employment Agencies Act 1973 have been brought against 24 persons. Twenty-three of these were successful and fines totalling £3,125 were imposed. Payment of a total of £916 in costs has been ordered and in one case compensation amounting to £60 was awarded to workers.The 23 successful prosecutions were in respect of 20 instances of carrying on an employment agency and/or employment business without a current licence and 20 other offences under the Act and the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 1976.

    Gateshead And Felling

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many females are unemployed in Gateshead; and how the figure compares with the same period in 1978.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 19 July 1979; Vol. 970, c. 801], gave the following answer:

    At 14 June, 1,380 females were registered as unemployed in the Gateshead employment office area, compared with 1,409 in June 1978.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) what is the total number of people unemployed in Gateshead; what percentage of those available for work this represents; and how the figures compare with the same period in 1978;(2) what is the total number of people unemployed in Felling-on-Tyne; what percentage of those available for work this represents; and how the figures compare with the same period in 1978.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 19 July 1979; Vol. 970, c. 803], gave the following answer:The following table gives the numbers of people registered as unemployed in the Gateshead and Felling employment office areas and unemployment rates for the South Tyneside travel-to-work area, which includes both of these places.

    Number Gatesheadunemployed FellingUnemployment rates for South Tyneside (per cent.)
    June 19785,2111,23311·3
    June 19795,0651,14010·9
    Unemployment rates are available only for the whole of a travel-to-work area, not separately for its constituent parts. They are calculated by expressing the numbers registered as unemployed as percentages of the total of employees, employed and unemployed.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many school leavers in Gateshead have yet to find employment; and how the number compares with the same period last year.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 19 July 1979; Vol. 970, c. 803], gave the following answer:At 14 June, 862 school leavers under 18 years of age were registered as unemployed in the Gateshead employment office area, compared with 936 in June 1978.

    Imi (Kynoch) Ltd

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will indicate how long he thinks it will take to complete the investigation into the explosion at the Witton factory of IMI (Kynoch) Ltd; if he is aware of the anxiety amongst local residents arising from this explosion; and if he will therefore make the report public when received.

    pursuant to his reply, [Official Report, 20 July 1979; Vol. 970, c. 842], gave the following answer:I am informed by the chairman of the Health and Safety Commission that the detailed laboratory examination of certain pieces of equipment, to which I referred in my previous answer on 19 June, is not yet complete. The latest estimate is that it will be mid-August before the inspector is able to complete his investigation.I can well understand the anxiety amongst local residents arising from this explosion. I am informed by the Commission that, by reason of the design of the factory and other licensing require-

    Numbers registered as unemployedPercentage rates of unemployment
    Employment Office areasMalesTotalMalesTotal
    Barnsley2,8474,116
    Hoyland360480
    Wombwell573889
    Barnsley travel-to-work area3,7805,4857·36·8
    Doncaster4,1776,938
    Thorne9681,556
    Doncaster travel-to-work area5,1458,4947·27·7
    Goldthorpe6491,007
    Mexborough1,2962,101
    Mexborough travel-to-work area1,9453,1089·610·2
    Chapeltown355466
    Dinnington589856
    Firth Park491699
    Sheffield8,25912,123
    Woodhouse522644
    Sheffield travel-to-work area10,21614,7885·75·0
    Maltby4877498·28·2
    Rotherham3,2564,8568·68·0
    COUNTY TOTAL24,82937,4806·76·4

    ments made by the Health and Safety Executive, any explosion within the factory is unlikely to have any external consequence affecting residents. I shall however, bear this point in mind when I receive the report of the HSE investigation and consider the question of its publication.

    South Yorkshire

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the present level of overall unemployment and of male unemployment in every employment office area and travel-to-work area in the county of South Yorkshire.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 20 July 1979; Vol. 970, c. 842], gave the following answer:The following table gives for each employment office area in South Yorkshire the numbers registered as unemployed at 14 June. Unemployment rates are given for these areas either singly or grouped into travel-to-work areas. Rates can be calculated for the whole of a travel-to-work area but not separately for its constituent parts.

    National Finance

    Tax Allowances

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the cost of increasing to the same level in real terms as it was set in 1973–74 at £100 the income tax allowance given to a widow—or widower—in respect of a relative resident with her—or him—or an unrelated person employed by, and resident with, her—or him—in the capacity of a housekeeper; and what that level would now be.

    About £1 million after the changes proposed in the Budget. On the basis of the change in the retail price index between April 1973 and April 1979 the new value would be £233.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the cost of increasing to the same level in real terms as it was set in 1973–74 at £55 the income tax allowance for the services of a daughter or son resident with, and maintained by, a claimant, whose services the claimant is compelled to depend on because of old age or infirmity; and what that level would now be.

    About £150,000 after the changes proposed in the Budget. On the basis of the change in the retail price index beween April 1973 and April 1979 the new value would be £128.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the cost of increasing to the same level in real terms as it was set in 1973–74 at £100—or £145 in respect of certain women claimants—the income tax allowance given in respect of a dependant who is a relative maintained by a claimant and is incapacitated by old age or infirmity; and what that level would now be.

    About £35 million after taking into account the changes proposed in the Budget. On the basis of the change in the retail price index between April 1973 and April 1979 the new value would be £233—£337 in respect of certain women claimants.

    Local Authorities (Land Acquisition)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he is satisfied that the standard form of letter used by the valuation office of the Inland Revenue notifying an owner of an authority's wish to acquire an interest in land or land and buildings, makes it sufficiently clear that all professional fees incurred by the owner will be paid by the acquiring authority; and, if not, whether he will consider amending the standard form letter specifically to advise the owner of the subject property to seek the advice of a solicitor or a quantity surveyor and valuer, or both.

    District valuers do not use a standard form when opening negotiations for the purchase of an interest in land. If, however, it appears that the owner is entitled to be reimbursed for professional fees reasonably incurred, the district valuer will, at the outset of negotiations, inform the owner that he will so recommend.

    Value Added Tax

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the expected yield in a full year from the imposition of value added tax at 15 per cent. on toys specially and exclusively made for the use of disabled children; and if he will consider removing this impost at an early date.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in view of the international yearling horse sales taking place within the next few months and owners making decisions regarding the countries in which their horses will be trained, what progress has been made following representations made to the European Commission regarding British bloodstock and value added tax; and if he will now make a statement.

    pursuant to his reply [Official Report, 19 July; Vol. 970, c. 818], gave the following answer:Following the assurance given to the House during the debate in Committee on the Finance Bill on 3 July, my right hon. and learned Friend has written to the EEC Commissioner concerned with VAT and to the President of the Commission emphasising both the importance and the urgency which the United Kingdom Government attach to securing early harmonisation of those aspects of VAT treatment of bloodstock in France and Ireland which in our view do not conform with the EEC sixth directive. It is too early to expect a reply.

    Income Tax

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what amount of income tax was paid (a) per household in each financial year since 1973–74 and (b) per capita in each financial year since 1973–74.

    Following is the information:

    Net payment of income tax and surtax
    Per householdPer capita
    ££
    1973–74389133
    1974–75536187
    1975–76773270
    1976–77862305
    1977–78872312
    1978–79 (provisional)935336

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many taxpayers paid income tax in each of the three top bands in 1974, and in the latest year for which figures are available.

    The number of people paying a marginal rate of tax corresponding to the top three rates of income tax in 1974–75 and in 1979–80 is estimated as follows:

    Thousands
    1974–75
    68 per cent.36
    73 per cent.26
    83 per cent.26
    1979–80*
    50 per cent.110
    55 per cent.40
    60 per cent.60
    *Provisional

    European Community (United Kingdom Investment)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the total direct investment by United Kingdom firms in the six original members of the EEC in each year since 1970; and what has been the total direct investment of the EEC Six in the United Kingdom in the same period.