Written Answers To Questions
Tuesday 22nd January 1980
"Buy British" Campaign
Q4.
asked the Prime Minister if she will initiate a "Buy British" campaign.
Of course I hope that people will buy British wherever possible, but British industry should aim to sell its products on their merits.
Mauchline
Q5.
asked the Prime Minister if she has any plans to visit Mauchline.
I have at present no plans to do so.
Prime Minister (Engagements)
Q6.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 22 January.
Q10.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 22 January.
Q11.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 22 January.
Q12.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 22 January.
Q13.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 22 January.
Q14.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagement for Tuesday 22 January.
Q15.
asked the Prime Minister whether she will list her official engagements for 22 January.
Q17.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 22 January.
Q18.
asked the Prime Minister whether she will list her official engagements for 22 January.
Q19.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 22 January.
Q20.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 22 January.
21.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 22 January.
Q22.
asked the Prime Minister what are her official engagements for Tuesday 22 January.
Q23.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 22 January.
Q24.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 22 January.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 22 January.
I refer my hon. Friends and the hon. Members to the reply which I gave earlier today to the hon. Member for Blackburn (Mr. Shaw).
Political Parties (Financial Assistance)
Q7.
asked the Prime Minister what requests she has received from political parties for increased State finance.
An approach has been made through the usual channels for an increase in the present amount of financial assistance given to Opposition parties to help in carrying out their parliamentary work at Westminster. There has otherwise been no request for further State financing of political parties.
Nuclear Materials (Export)
Q8.
asked the Prime Minister if she will discuss with other member countries of the London Group of Nations the formation of policy to restrict the export of items which could make possible nuclear proliferation.
The members of the Nuclear Suppliers Group—the "London Club"—have agreed to act according to common principles, made public in January 1978, when considering the export of nuclear material equipment or technology. In doing this they were aware of the need to contribute to the development of nuclear power while avoiding contributing in any way to the dangers of proliferation of nuclear weapons.
Kingsthorpe
Q9.
asked the Prime Minister whether she will pay an official visit to Kingsthorpe.
I have at present no plans to do so.
Ministerial Appointments
Q16.
asked the Prime Minister if she has any plans to announce ministerial changes.
No.
Quangos
asked the Prime Minister what was the total cost of the report "Non-Departmental Public Bodies", Cmnd. 7797, prepared by Sir Leo Pliatzky, broken down into (a) Sir Leo's salary, (b) other staff salaries incurred by the inquiry team, (c) the cost of the time of those called in by the inquiry and (d) printing and office costs.
The cost of completing the report was £34,500 including Sir Leo Pliatzky's salary of £9,360 and the salaries of his support staff of £16,600. No estimate of the cost of the time of those called in by the inquiry is available.
Preparation of the report for printing and the publishing costs were £27,500 made up of costs to Her Majesty's Stationery Office of £22,500, the bulk of which it is expected will be recovered from sales of the report, and other costs to the Civil Service Department of £5,000.
Home Department
Immigration
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people are at present held in custody and awaiting deportation for immigration offences.
The information requested could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. However, information is published annually in "Prison Statistics" on the number of receptions and the average daily population of persons held under the Immigration Act 1971 in prison department establishments in England and Wales—for example, table 1.1 of the issue for 1978, Cmnd. 7626; these persons include some not awaiting deportation and some who have not committed an immigration offence.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many non-patrials refused entry in each of the last three years were diagnosed as suffering from (a) mental illness or mental disorder, (b) subnormality, (c) fits, (d) conduct disorder and (e) senility.
Information is not available in the form requested. The available information is given in the following table:
| REFUSALS OF LEAVE TO ENTER THE UNITED KINGDOM ON MEDICAL GROUNDS—COMMONWEALTH CITIZENS AND FOREIGN NATIONALS | |||
| Number of refusals | |||
| Mental disorder* | Others—medically unsuitable* | Total refusals | |
| 1976 | 102 | 39 | 11,534 |
| 1977 | 128 | 54 | 12,942 |
| 1978 | 150 | 66 | 15,729 |
| * As recommended by the port medical inspector. | |||
Policewomen
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether women police officers are expected to undertake the same physical risks and activities as men; and what assessment he has received as to their effectiveness.
Ability, not sex, should be the criterion for the allocation of police duties, including those involving physical risks. I am convinced that women police officers make an essential and effective contribution to the police service.
Prisoners
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the general privileges removed from persons serving long-term prison sentences since May; and if he will make a statement.
Revised instructions were issued to all prison department establishments last April with the aim of rationalising privileges and simplifying arrangements for their administration.No privileges which were generally available in the prison system were withdrawn from long-term prisoners. Indeed, some privileges previously permitted only after completion of three years of a sentence are now allowed from the outset.Many long-term prisoners serve their sentences in dispersal prisons where it has been the practice over a number of years to allow prisoners extra privileges including the right to retain rather more personal possessions than are generally permitted in the rest of the prison system. However, the range of items that prisoners may retain has varied substantially between dispersal prisons. In his report on the riot at Her Majesty's prison, Hull, the Chief Inspector of Prisons identified the disparity in this practice between the various dispersal prisons as a source of discontent in these prisons, and he recommended that there should be a greater uniformity of practice. The opportunity was taken to implement this recommendation when the revised instructions on privileges were issued. As a consequence of harmonisation, many long-term prisoners will benefit from the wider availability of additional personal possessions, but it would not have been possible to do this without withdrawing some items from a few prisoners in particular dispersal prisons, because the availability of these items could not be extended to all dispersal prisons.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department on the most recent data, for which figures are available, how many prisoners were (a) in cellular confinement as a punishment, (b) confined to cell because they had been deprived of associated work as a punishment, (c) segregated for their own protection, (d) segregated for the maintenance of good order and discipline, or (e) confined to their cells because they were unemployed owing to unavailability of work or of workshop staff, giving the figures for unconvicted and convicted separately if possible.
On 30 November 1979, 807 male and two female prisoners were segregated for their own protection; and 104 males and 9 females were segregated for the maintenance of good order and discipline. I regret that the other information requested is not readily available and could not be obtained without disproportionate cost.
Police Pensions (Convicted Persons)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what are the criteria applied in respect of the payment of pensions, or part pensions, to a convicted person who was, prior to conviction, a police officer.
A convicted person's entitlement to a police pension may be forfeited if the conviction is for offences:
Special Patrol Groups
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will recommend chief constables to make sure that all members of police special patrol groups, and similar groups under different names, receive training in community relations.
All police officers receive training in community relations during their probationary period. There is an element of community relations training in both the initial and continuation courses provided at Home Office police training centres, and this is supplemented in a number of forces by locally arranged training. It is for chief officers of police to determine the precise form and content of local training in community relations, but where new recruits are concerned forces are recommended to follow a special standard syllabus drawn up by a Home Office working party.
Mentally-Ill Prisoners
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is the annual average cost of maintaining in prisons in England and Wales a prisoner who fits the criteria set out in section 72(1)(a) and (b) of the Mental Health Act 1959.
A prisoners who fits the criteria set out in section 72(1)(a) and (b) of the Mental Health Act 1959 is detained in a prison appropriate to his security category and the cost of his maintenance is not separately identified. The average annual cost of keeping a person in prison in England and Wales during 1978–79 was £5,894.
Recidivists Anonymous
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department in which prisons groups of the organisation Recidivists Anonymous operate; and what arrangements are made to encourage staff to become involved in their work.
One group operates in Standford Hill prison. The concept of Recidivists Anonymous, as an organisation run by prisoners for their mutual help, limits the scope for involvement of staff in its activities.
High Courts (Trial Costs)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will give, for the longest and most convenient period of time, the number of cases prosecuted by the Crown in the High Courts and costs of each case; and what action he has taken or intends taking to reduce these costs in accordance with the Government's policy of reducing public expenditure.
I assume the hon. Member is referring to prosecutions in the Crown court.The number of cases disposed of in the Crown court in 1978 is published in table B1 of Judicial Statistics, England and Wales, 1978 (Cmnd. 7627). The costs of each case are not centrally recorded. The Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure is examining the prosecution process and its terms of reference include the need for the efficient and economical use of resources.
Home Defence
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what monitoring he carries out as to local authorities' plans for home defence; if he is satisfied with these plans and local authorities' preparedness; and if he will make a statement.
My Department's scrutiny of the payment of specific grant-in-aid affords some appraisal of the performance of duties under the Civil Defence (Planning) Regulations 1974, and there is considerable informal contact between my officials and local authority staffs responsible for home defence planning. I am satisfied that progress is being made in most areas in improving local preparedness. The current review of home defence arrangements includes the vital contribution made by local government.
Parkhurst Prison
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is the reason for the delay in implementing the £2½ million scheme for modernising Parkhurst Prison, Isle of Wight.
Industrial action by prison service staff has delayed the start of major works inside the prison.
"Prisons And The Prisoner"
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he endorses the views contained in "Prisons and the Prisoner".
The introduction to this account of the prison services in England and Wales makes clear that the content reflects developments up to early 1977. If the hon. Member wishes to pursue a particular aspect of this publication, I will be glad to consider his further inquiry.
"A Review Of Criminal Justice Policy"
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he endorses the views contained in "A Review of Criminal Justice Policy".
This Home Office working paper, prepared under the previous Administration, consists for the most part of an analysis of objectives in the criminal justice field and a summary of the findings of research completed at that time. I broadly agree with the main conclusions set out in paragraph 17 of the working paper. If the hon. Member wishes to raise any point on other sections of the paper, I shall be glad to consider his further inquiry.
Prison Population
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the evidence given by his Department to the Expenditure Committee on the reduction of the prison population.
I have no plans to make any such statement.
Crime Policy Planning Units
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department on what subjects the Crime Policy Planning Unit compiled reports; and if these will be published.
Subjects with which the Crime Policy Planning Unit has recently been concerned include the prospects for the criminal justice system over the next decade; ways of reducing the prison population; and the development of a co-ordinated criminal justice research programme. The unit is not primarily engaged in producing formal reports, but contributes in a variety of ways to the work of the Department as a whole. I have no plans at present to publish any material arising from the unit's work.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will take steps to ensure that other Departments are represented on the committees of the Crime Policy Planning Unit to ensure that the importance of education, social services, employment and housing are fully taken into account in planning crime prevention policy.
The Crime Policy Planning Unit, like the rest of the Home Office, retains close contacts with other Departments on all subjects of common interest, including crime prevention. There is no set practice about how other Departments are associated with the unit's work, and I think it best to leave the arrangements flexible.
Life Prisoners
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the average term served at release on licence by prisoners sentenced to life imprisonment who were released in each of the last five years in England and Wales.
The average periods of detention, calculated from the date on which each prisoner was first remanded in custody were as follows:
| Average period of detention | ||
| Year | Years | Months |
| 1975 | 10 | 7 |
| 1976 | 10 | 4 |
| 1977 | 9 | 10 |
| 1978 | 9 | 9 |
| 1979 | 9 | 8 |
Northern Ireland
Teachers
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what is the present number of teachers registered as
| Employment Services Office Area | Males | Females | Total | |||||
| Antrim | … | … | … | … | 6 | 19 | 25 | |
| Armagh | … | … | … | … | 3 | 14 | 17 | |
| Ballymena | … | … | … | … | 5 | 13 | 18 | |
| Ballymoney | … | … | … | … | 2 | 9 | 11 | |
| Ballynahinch | … | … | … | … | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Banbridge | … | … | … | … | 0 | 8 | 8 | |
| Bangor | … | … | … | … | 8 | 39 | 47 | |
| Belfast | … | … | … | … | 77 | 148 | 225 | |
| Carrickfergus | … | … | … | 3 | 8 | 11 | ||
| Coleraine | … | … | … | … | 11 | 33 | 44 | |
| Cookstown | … | … | … | … | 4 | 10 | 14 | |
| Downpatrick | … | … | … | … | 3 | 9 | 12 | |
| Dungannon | … | … | … | … | 10 | 21 | 31 | |
| Enniskillen | … | … | … | … | 7 | 26 | 33 | |
| Kilkeel | … | … | … | … | … | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Larne | … | … | … | … | … | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Limavady | … | … | … | … | 6 | 16 | 22 | |
| Lisburn | … | … | … | … | 2 | 37 | 39 | |
| Londonderry | … | … | … | … | 19 | 22 | 41 | |
| Lurgan | … | … | … | … | 4 | 13 | 17 | |
| Magherafelt | … | … | … | … | 6 | 10 | 16 | |
| Newcastle | … | … | … | … | 2 | 12 | 14 | |
| Newry | … | … | … | … | … | 12 | 26 | 38 |
| Newtownards | … | … | … | 2 | 24 | 26 | ||
| Omagh | … | … | … | … | 8 | 23 | 31 | |
| Portadown | … | … | … | … | 0 | 14 | 14 | |
| Strabane | … | … | … | … | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| Northern Ireland Total | 210 | 572 | 782 | |||||
Constitutional Conference
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how much money has been claimed or paid to the participants at the conference taking place at Stormont.
£1,355 up to 20 January.
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what have been the takings in the two bars provided for participants at the conference taking place at Stormont.
£59 up to 9 January.
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will give an estimate of the cost of (a) re-locating staff from Parliament Building, Stormont, in preparation for his conference, (b) decorating and refurbishing the rooms used for the conference, (c) decorating and refurbishing the rooms used by the parties involved, (d) decorating and refurbishing the rooms used by the press, unemployed in each region of Northern Ireland.
The information is as follows:Unemployed teachers in Northern Ireland on 6 December 1979:(
e) the construction of two bars, and ( f) the security of the conference.
The information is as follows:
Education And Science
European Community (Overseas Students)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list the member States of the EEC which do not impose fees on foreign students studying at universities within their country.
According to our information, Denmark and Luxembourg do not charge fees either for their own or foreign students; France, Italy, the Netherlands and West Germany charge the same fees for all students; Belgium's policy, in general, is to charge foreign students the same fees as home students up to a limit of 2 per cent. of the number of Belgian students and thereafter full cost fees; and the Republic of Ireland charges differential fees.
School Meals (London)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what is the number of children attending Inner London Education Authority schools and taking school meals; and how many of these are free meals.
On a day in October 1979, 299,047 children were attending schools maintained by the Inner London Education Authority, of whom 186,832—62·5 per cent.—took a school meal. The number receiving free school meals was 67,362—22·5 per cent. of those in attendance.
School Buildings (Temperature Ranges)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will seek to lower the recommended specific temperature ranges for school buildings.
No. Regulations and published departmental guidance lay down temperature values which are appropriate for different categories of educational premises and the children and staff who use them. The efficient use of fuel and energy within this range of specified temperatures can be best achieved by following the advice contained in my Department's publications on energy conservation.
Computer Languages
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science how many of the staff of his Department of the rank of under secretary and above have one year or more of practical experience of the use of each of the following computer languages: ALGOL, COBOL, BASIC, FORTRAN, PILOT, TUTOR, PASCAL and FORTH.
One, in ALGOL and FORTRAN.
State Schools (Pupil Costs)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will publish an estimate of the average weekly cost to parents of sending a child to a State school, taking into account the costs of school uniform and sports equipment, subscriptions and outings, school meals and average transport costs.
This information is not available.
Statutory Walking Distances
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what percentage of school children live within the statutory walking distances from the schools which they attend; and how this figure compares with the position 10 years ago.
Information is not available to answer the question in this form, but a special survey conducted in 1972 showed that in England and Wales about 90 per cent. of primary and secondary school pupils lived within the statutory walking distances of their schools. No comparable information exists for any other years.
Universities
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if, pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member for Rother Valley on 19 December 1979, he will explain why, despite his undertakings made on 26 November 1979 to keep the trade union side of the Central Council for Non-Teaching Staffs in Universities informed of matters affecting universities, no notification was or has been given of an announcement concerning supplementary payments which was made within 48 hours of the undertaking being made.
In the light of the undertaking given at the meeting on 26 November 1979, arrangements were put in hand on 27 November for the trade union side of the central council to be informed of matters affecting universities, but those arrangements were not fully implemented by 28 November when the announcement of supplementary grants to universities was made.—[Vol. 974, c. 648.] I infer from the hon. Members' question that the central council is none the less aware of the announcement and, presumably, of its content.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what expenditure he expects will have been incurred by universities in England and Wales during the current year; by how much he expects this sum to exceed the original estimates; and by how much support will be increased to meet the deficiency.
I explained in the reply which I gave to the hon. Member on 19 December 1979 that it was not possible at this stage to estimate the total expenditure of universities in the current financial year. £63 million has been added to the universities' recurrent grant in this financial year towards the cost of pay and price increases higher than those assumed when the grants for the academic year 1978–79 and 1979–80 were originally settled.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what payments of value added tax were made in 1978–79 and have been or could be made in the current year by universities in England and Wales; and by how much the increased payments in the current year will be compensated.
No central record is kept of payments of value added tax by universities and the information, if available at all, could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. During this financial year no additional grant will be made for price rises higher than those assumed in the grants as originally settled.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if, pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member for Rother Valley on 19 December 1979, he will now list the numbers of staff, other than teaching and research staff, at each university in England and Wales.
This information is not available in my Department.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science how many people employed at universities in England and Wales are currently at risk through failure to meet the requirements of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act or of fire precautions.
The Department has no information on this subject. Each university is responsible for making its own arrangements to comply with the requirements arising from legislation on fire precautions and health and safety at work.
Handicapped Children Integration Schemes
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will publish a report on the progress of the three-year study of existing integration schemes begun in September 1978, stating the interim findings of that study and how it relates to his consideration of submissions on the Warnock report and the implementation of section 10 of the Education Act 1976.
A three-year study of current provision for handicapped children in ordinary schools, sponsored by my Department, was started in September 1977 by the National Foundation for Educational Research. It is not intended to publish a report until after the study has been completed later this year. I shall consider at that time whether to make any statement on the study.
Overseas Students
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he plans to exempt overseas students currently on GCE, non-advanced or foundation courses in the United Kingdom from the proposed 100 per cent. plus increases in tuition fees in 1980–81 when they proceed to higher level courses.
No.
Postgraduate Students
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he plans to include polytechnic postgraduates in the special arrangements to allow selected students to pay home fees; and whether these arrangements will be in addition to a continued programme of fees awards for postgraduates from developing countries operated by the Overseas Development Administration.
Initially these arrangements apply only in universities. I will be prepared to consider with those concerned whether similar arrangements might be introduced in maintained institutions. The scheme is quite distinct from
| Visits by Secretary of State (Mr. Mark Carlisle, Q.C.) | ||||
| 9 May 1979 | … | … | … | Grange School, Northwich. |
| 14 July 1979 | … | … | … | King Edward's School, Birmingham. |
| 14 September 1979 | … | … | St. John's Roman Catholic School, Warrington. | |
| 21 September 1979 | … | … | St. Nicholas' Roman Catholic School, Northwich. | |
| 26 September 1979 | … | … | Cavendish School, Hemel Hempstead. | |
| 5 October 1979 | … | … | Appleton High School. Warrington. | |
| 8 October 1979 | … | … | Lytham High School. | |
| 8 October 1979 | … | … | Queen Mary's School, Lytham. | |
| 11 October 1979 | … | … | Kirkham Grammar School, Preston. | |
| 11 October 1979 | … | … | Highfield Priory School, Preston. | |
| 27 October 1979 | … | … | Mostyn House School, Parkgate, Cheshire. | |
| 2 November 1979 | … | … | Bradford Grammar School | |
| 23 November 1979 | … | … | Heath School, Runcorn, Cheshire. | |
| 25 November 1979 | … | … | Mount Carmel School, Alderley Edge, Cheshire. | |
| 26 November 1979 | … | … | Hounslow Heath Infant School. | |
| 26 November 1979 | … | … | Belmont Junior Mixed and Infant School, Chiswick. | |
| 26 November 1979 | … | … | Martindale School for the Handicapped, Hounslow. | |
| 7 December 1979 | … | … | Kenton Bar Primary School, Newcastle. | |
| 7 December 1979 | … | … | Kenton Comprehensive School, Newcastle. | |
| 10 December 1979 | … | … | Pimlico School, London S.W.1. | |
| 14 December 1979 | … | … | Wirral Grammar School. | |
| Visits by Minister of State (Baroness Young) | ||||
| 2 July 1979 | … | … | … | Townfield School, Hayes. |
| 2 July 1979 | … | … | … | Queensmead School, Ruislip |
| 9 July 1979 | … | … | … | Upton House School, Hackney. |
| 9 July 1979 | … | … | … | Skinners' Company School, Hackney. |
| 18 September 1979 | … | … | West Horndon County Primary School, Essex. | |
| 18 September 1979 | … | … | Anglo-European School, Ingatestone, Essex. | |
| 20 September 1979 | … | … | Chipping Camden School, Gloucestershire. | |
| 3 October 1979 | … | … | Sevenoaks School, Kent. | |
| 15 October 1979 | … | … | Kings School, Canterbury. | |
| 17 October 1979 | … | … | Henry Fanshawe School, Derbyshire. | |
| 1 November 1979 | … | … | Eaton School, Norwich. | |
| 22 November 1979 | … | … | Castle Donington High School, Leicester. | |
| 22 November 1979 | … | … | Burleigh College, Loughborough. | |
| 27 November 1979 | … | … | Onslow School, Hertfordshire. | |
| 27 November 1979 | … | … | Watford Boys' Grammar School, Hertfordshire. | |
| 4 December 1979 | … | … | Corporation Road Nursery School, Durham. | |
| 4 December 1979 | … | … | Queen Elizabeth Sixth Form College, Durham. | |
| 4 December 1979 | … | … | Salters Lane Special School, Durham. | |
| 4 December 1979 | … | … | Newton Aycliffe Byerley Park Junior and Infants School, Durham. | |
| 4 December 1979 | … | … | Greenfield Comprehensive School, Durham. | |
| 11 December 1979 | … | … | Eleanor Palmer Nursery School, London N.W.5. | |
| 11 December 1979 | … | … | Highgate Nursery, London N.6. | |
| 14 December 1979 | … | … | St. Michael's Convent, Finchley. | |
| Visits by Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Dr. Rhodes Boyson) | |||
| 11 September 1979 | … | … | Oliver Goldsmith School, Kingsbury. |
| 18 October 1979 | … | … | Sir Robert Southwell School, London N.W.9. |
| 19 October 1979 | … | … | Eton College. |
| 9 November1979 | … | … | Highbury Grove School, London N.5. |
| 14 November 1979 | … | … | Wembley High School. |
| 5 December 1979 | … | … | Jewish Free School, London N.W.1 |
| 12 December 1979 | … | … | Wolver Hampton Grammar School. |
any other arrangements for awards to overseas postgraduates.
Ministers (Visits To Schools)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will publish in the Official Report a list of the schools which he and each other Minister in his Department has visited since assuming office.
The information requested is as follows:
Visits by Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Mr. Neil Macfarlane) | |||
| 20 September 1979 | … | … | Holsworthy Church of England Primary School, Devon. |
| 20 September 1979 | … | … | Chulmleigh School, Devon. |
| 20 September 1979 | … | … | North Devon College. |
| 20 September 1979 | … | … | Exeter College, Devon. |
| 31 October 1979 | … | … | Christ's School, Richmond |
Industry
Manufacturing Industry
asked the Secretary of State for Industry what has been the level of investment in manufacturing industry at 1965 prices in each year since 1945.
Statistics of manufacturing investment are not compiled at 1965 prices. The figures given below have been derived by reducing the published 1975 price based series to 1965 price levels by applying a constant factor. This adjustment rescales the series to the general level of 1965 capital expenditure prices, but retains the year to year percentage movements of the original 1975 price series.The table is from 1955, the earliest year for which this adjustment can be made.
| Gross Domestic Fixed Capital Formation by Manufacturing Industry at 1975 prices resealed to 1965 prices £ million | |
| 1955 | 917 |
| 1956 | 1,063 |
| 1957 | 1,125 |
| 1958 | 1,065 |
| 1959 | 1,016 |
| 1960 | 1,183 |
| 1961 | 1,406 |
| 1962 | 1,299 |
| 1963 | 1,136 |
| 1964 | 1,283 |
| 1965 | 1,423 |
| 1966 | 1,460 |
| 1967 | 1,425 |
| 1968 | 1,521 |
| 1969 | 1,628 |
| 1970 | 1,754 |
| 1971 | 1,636 |
| 1972 | 1,415 |
| 1973 | 1,444 |
| 1974 | 1,588 |
| 1975 | 1,478 |
| 1976 | 1,403 |
| 1977 | 1,527 |
| 1978 | 1,617 |
Wales
National Parks (Access Agreements)
asked the Secretary of State for Wales when he expects an access agreement to the Nantlle Ridge in Snowdonia to be completed.
Access agreements to the Nantlle Ridge are primarily the responsibility of Gwynedd county council, which has been negotiating with tenants of agricultural holdings within my right hon. Friend's ownership. Three holdings, known as Drws-y-Coed Isaf, Talymignedd Uchaf and Drws-y-Coed Uchaf, are affected and I understand that agreement has been reached on the areas of land to be included and the means of access thereto. Negotiations are proceeding on the valuation of the consideration payment and access agreements are expected to be concluded later this year.
Lambs And Sheep
asked the Secretary of State for Wales how much money was paid to sheep producers in Wales during 1979 through the guaranteed deficiency payment scheme for lambs and sheep; what were the corresponding figures for each of the last 10 years; and if he will make a statement.
The amount of money paid in respect of sheep presented at certification centres in Wales during 1979 and the corresponding figures for each of the last 10 marketing years is as follows:
| Marketing Year (April/March) | Amount (£ million) |
| 1968/69 | 0·80 |
| 1969/70 | 0·36 |
| 1970/71 | 1·35 |
| 1971/72 | 2·21 |
| 1972/73 | 0·28 |
| 1973/74 | NIL |
| 1974/75 | 1·39 |
| 1975/76 | 1·18 |
| 1976/77 | 0·03 |
| 1977/78 | 0·09 |
| 1978/79 | 0·01 |
| 1979/80 to 31.12.79 | 1·81(estimate) |
Development Board For Rural Wales
asked the Secretary of State for Wales from what sources he supplemented the grant of the Development Board for Rural Wales for the year 1979–80.
The supplement came from the October 1977 construction package and from resources released by adjustments made to other Welsh Office programmes.
Civil Service
Pensions (Convicted Persons)
asked the Minister for the Civil Serivce what are the criteria applied in respect of the payment of pension, or part pension, to a convicted person who was, prior to conviction, in the service of the Crown.
Pension benefits may be withheld wholly or in part if a civil servant or former civil servant is convicted of a serious offence in connection with his employment. Such cases are rare and no set criteria have been laid down for determining when and to what extent these discretionary powers should be used. Each case is considered individually according to the nature and seriousness of the offence, the penalties imposed by the courts and the personal circumstances and past record of the individual. In certain cases, the Minister is required to certify that the offence was either gravely injurious to the State or was liable to lead to serious loss of confidence in the public service.
Overseas Development
Poliomyelitis
asked the Lord Privy Seal what support his local overseas offices are giving towards the elimination of poliomyelitis throughout the world; and if he will make a statement.
Our contribution is being made through support of the WHO expanded programme of immunisation and the stop polio campaign undertaken by the Save the Children Fund in close co-operation with the World Health Organisation, other international agencies and the overseas Governments concerned.
Employment
Job Creation
13.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what contribution the Employment Protection Act 1976 has made towards the creation of new jobs.
I believe the overall effect of this Act, now consolidated, has been to inhibit rather than encourage the creation of new jobs—especially in small businesses. The provisions of the Employment Bill, when enacted, will relieve this.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment, in money terms and in terms of numbers affected under each heading, what is the effect on (a) the North-West, (b) Merseyside (c) Kirkby and (d) Ormskirk of his cuts in job promotion, job protection and training schemes, giving that information itemised for each scheme.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
Young People (Training)
14.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether his Department has carried out a survey of the different types of training schemes for young people which have been pioneered by employers and voluntary bodies; and if he will make a statement.
I am informed by the Manpower Services Commission that a number of surveys relating to training provision have been carried out in recent years, in particular those which preceded the introduction of the youth opportunities programme and the training for skills programme for action. A survey has also recently been completed by the National Foundation for Educational Research for the MSC and the Department of Education and Science on the development of the unified vocational preparation schemes.
North-West Region
16.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what the latest unemployment rates are for the North-West of England.
At 10 January the provisional unemployment rate in the North-West region was 7·6 per cent. The rates for males and females were 9·0 and 5·6 per cent., respectively.
Temporary Short-Time Working Compensation Scheme
17.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment when he expects to conclude his review of the temporary short-time working scheme.
The annual review of the temporary short-time working compensation scheme has not yet been completed, but I hope to make an announcement about the scheme shortly.
Construction Industry
18.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what plans he has to reduce unemployment in the construction industry on Merseyside.
The strength of the construction industry on Merseyside is linked to the overall strength of the economy. Merseyside however may benefit particularly from the measures taken to promote urban development.
Employment Bill
19.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what consultations he has had with the Trades Union Congress and other trade union representatives since the Employment Bill received a Second Reading on 17 December last.
My right hon. Friend had a further meeting with representatives of the TUC on Thursday, 10 January to discuss the Employment Bill.
Small Firms
20.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he is satisfied with the employment practices of small firms; and if he will make a statement.
I have no grounds for criticising the employment practices of small firms generally.
Unemployed Persons
21.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the current level of unemployment
At 10 January the provisional number of people registered as unemployed in Great Britain was 1,404,439.
26.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the latest estimate of the numbers and percentage unemployed in the United Kingdom; and what measures the Government intend to take to reduce these figures.
At 10 January the provisional number of people registered as unemployed in the United Kingdom was 1,470,621, a percentage rate of 6·1. The Government will continue their fiscal and monetary policies to provide the right economic climate for an expansion of real jobs.
32.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people currently are unemployed, and how many unfilled vacancies exist, in the county of South Yorkshire.
At 10 January the provisional number of people registered as unemployed in the county of South Yorkshire was 38,115. At 4 January there were 2,148 vacancies remaining unfilled at employment offices and 229 at careers offices. Vacancies notified to employment offices are estimated to be about one-third of all vacancies in the country as a whole. Because of possible duplication the vacancy figures at employment offices and careers offices should not be added together.
35.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is his expectation of the changes in the level of unemployment in 1980; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend has made no secret of his view that unemployment will rise during 1980. However, it lies within the power of both sides of industry working together to improve their productivity and competitiveness and this would offer the best hope of bringing unemployment down.
Secret Ballots
22.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many letters he has received supporting the legislative proposals regarding the use of the secret ballot in trade union matters.
Well over 100 letters about the use of secret ballots by trade unions have been received either by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister or myself.
25.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many trade unions make no provision in their rules for a secret ballot of their members.
I regret that a completely comprehensive answer would involve disproportionate cost. However, of the 42 unions which have 50,000 members or more, and cover nearly 90 per cent. of union members, six have rules which omit any reference to provision for secret ballots of their members.
Job Release Scheme
23.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether he plans to continue the job release scheme beyond 31 March 1980; and if he will make a statement.
A decision about the future of the job release scheme will be made as part of the annual review of the special employment and training measures, which has not yet been completed. My right hon. Friend hopes to make an announcement about the scheme shortly.
Electrical Equipment (Certification)
24.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what progress he has made in reducing the delays in processing applications for the approval and certification of equipment by the British Approval Service for electrical equipment in flammable atmospheres.
To speed up certification work at BASEEFA it is necessary to recruit and train suitably qualified people. Further progress has been made in that direction by engaging five professional staff since October. This is additional to the secondment and recruitment of five staff earlier in the year. The benefits of these measures should be felt once the staff are fully experienced.
Thirty per cent. more certifications were issued in the last quarter of 1979 than in the corresponding quarter of 1978.
Strike Pay
27.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what discussions he has had with the trade unions on the provision of strike pay.
None.
Bradford
28.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what steps he is taking to limit unemployment in Bradford.
I am very much aware that the difficulties experienced by the textile industry have contributed to Bradford's current unemployment problems and in this connection the forthcoming redundancies at Associated Weavers are a matter of concern. We remain convinced, however, that the solution to unemployment lies in a positive response to the Government's economic policies from both management and work forces in seizing market opportunities and increasing productivity and quality of output linked with sensible wage bargaining. Only with the wholehearted co-operation of both sides of industry and commerce can we achieve a healthy economy which will provide the new jobs which are needed in Bradford and elsewhere in the country.
Industrial Disputes (Lost Working Days)
29.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what was the total of working days lost as a result of strikes in 1979.
The total for 1979 is not yet available. In the first 11 months of 1979 27·7 million working days were lost through industrial disputes in the United Kingdom.
Tuc
30.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment when next he plans to meet the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress.
I keep in frequent contact with members of the TUC and am ready to meet them at any time.
Energy
Energy Conservation
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what is the total sum presently being spent by the Government to encourage the conservation of energy; and what are the Government's plans for encouraging the more efficient use of energy by industry and commerce.
The energy conservation programme is expected to cost some £125 million in 1979–80. The greater part of this expenditure is on conservation in homes in both the public and private sectors, and in other public sector buildings. The Government believe that the economic pricing of energy provides the main stimulus to the more efficient use of energy by industry and commerce. This incentive is reinforced by information and advisory services such as the energy survey scheme, the energy quick advice service, and a wide range of publications, including the Department of Energy's monthly newspaper Energy Management. In addition, a programme of projects aimed at promoting new energy-saving technology is being funded by the Government under the energy conservation demonstration projects scheme.
Oil (Refined Products)
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what is the percentage share of United Kingdom refiners in the EEC market for refined products;
| Refined petroleum products* 1976 | ||||||||||
| Mode of transport | Million tonnes | Percentage of total inland deliveries | ||||||||
| Road | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | 49·2 | 61·2 |
| Rail | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | 16·7 | 20·8 |
| Water— | ||||||||||
| Coastal | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | 29·2 | 36·4 | |
| Inland | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | 5·1 | 6·4 | |
| Inland pipeline | … | … | … | … | … | … | 22·4 | 28·0 | ||
| Total inland deliveries | … | … | … | … | … | 80·3 | ||||
| Source: UKPIAC return. | ||||||||||
| * Because of un quantified double handling the tonnage figures are in excess of total inland deliveries for the year and the quoted percentages sum to more than 100: they give the proportions of total inland deliveries that were transported, at least part way, by each mode. | ||||||||||
North Sea Oil And Gas
asked the Secretary of State for Energy, pursuant to his answer, Official Report, 20 December 1979, c. 295, what is his estimate of the royalty oil available to him in the second half of 1980 and on an annual basis thereafter.
The amount of royalty oil available is expected to be a little under 12½ per cent. of total production from United Kingdom continental shelf oil-fields in the periods concerned.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what has been the estimated total value, respectively, of North and what are the figures for the preceding five years.
The marketable output of petroleum products from United Kingdom refineries is expressed as a percentage of the EEC consumption of petroleum products for each of the years 1974 to 1978 and for the latest available period in 1979.
| Percentage | |||||
| 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 |
| January-June | |||||
| 21·2 | 18·3 | 17·8 | 17·5 | 17·5 | 16·8 |
| Source: OECD quarterly oil statistics | |||||
asked the Secretary of State for Energy, of the total volume of refined products for the last year for which figures are available, what tonnage and percentage were moved by road, coastal shipping, pipeline and rail.
The inquiry for collecting data on the transport of refined petroleum products has been discontinued. The latest year for which figures are available is 1976.Sea oil and gas reserves at current prices each year since 1965 and at constant 1980 prices; and what percentage these figures represent of the gross national product.
[pursuant to his reply, 18 January 1980]: Comparable estimates of total recoverable reserves of oil and gas on the United Kingdom continental shelf are not available annually from 1965, and reserve estimates are subject to a wide margin of error. However, in 1978 reserves of oil were valued at around £200,000 million at current prices, equivalent to about 140 per cent. of 1978 GNP. At average 1979 prices these oil reserves would be worth around £250,000 million or about 160 per cent. of the latest GNP estimate—1979 third quarter rate. At January 1980 prices oil reserves would be worth around £350,000 million or about 220 per cent. of the latest GNP estimate.The value of gas reserves at oil-equivalent prices is estimated to be approximately half that of oil reserves.
Transport
Inland Waterways (Exhibition)
asked the Minister of Transport if he will arrange for an exhibition relating to inland waterways to be displayed in the Upper Waiting Hall.
Yes. An exhibition prepared by the Canals and Waterways Alliance will be on display in the Upper Waiting Hall during the week commencing 21 January.
Roads (Maintenance)
asked the Minister of Transport if he will make a statement on the Government's intentions regarding the safety of road users in the light of the excessive damage caused to roads by the increasing numbers of heavy vehicles and lack of spending or maintenance.
Local authorities are spending over £550 million a year on road maintenance—on local roads and as agent authorities on roads for which my right hon. Friend is responsible. Urgent motorway repairs are receiving prority attention because of the effects or increased volumes of heavy vehicles.Road safety continues to be a major consideration in determining priorities.
Tyres
asked the Minister of Transport if he is satisfied that his Department has taken sufficient interest in the encouragement of car and truck tyre developments in the areas of grip on wet roads, road damage and protection from blowout punctures.
The Department has in hand various work on tyres. The Transport and Road Research Laboratory is examining the wet-grip performance of a range of truck tyres and, based on earlier work at the laboratory, we have put proposals to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe for possible international standards for the wet-grip performance of motor-cycle tyres. The laboratory has also investigated the influence of tyre size and design on road damage, but concluded that this was slight. I welcome development and use of "run-flat" tyres and devices to maintain deflated tyres on the wheel-rim while a damaged vehicle is brought to a halt. The Department is assessing various of these in co-operation with the industry.
British Railways (Electrification)
asked the Minister of Transport when he expects to receive detailed electrification proposals from British Railways; and whether he will view maximum electrification proposals with favour if a good economic case is made.
The case for a programme of main line electrificaton is currently the subject of a joint study by the Railways Board and my Department. An interim report was published in September and the final report should be published during the summer. Sir Peter Parker and I will consider this very carefully, taking into account the outlook for the economy as a whole and the prospects of the main railway business, especially its major commercial sectors. Meanwhile, I am willing to consider any individual electrification proposals which the Railways Board may wish to submit to me.
Bypasses
asked the Minister of Transport how many towns and villages are known to suffer such heavy traffic that they need bypasses immediately; to what extent the expected growth in traffic will increase that total of towns and villages by 1990; to what extent his Department's plans will fulfil that need for bypasses by 1990; and what is the estimated cost of providing all of these bypasses.
There are no precise criteria of need for a bypass. Schemes in the trunk road programme would provide bypasses for almost all the communities for which they are, or are likely to become, justified on economic and environmental grounds. On timing and cost, I must ask the hon. Member to await the forthcoming White Paper. Bypasses on non-trunk roads are the responsibility of the local highway authorities.
National Freight Corporation
asked the Minister of Transport if he will list the directors of the National Freight Corporation and the dates on which their appointments expire.
The board of directors of the National Freight Corporation, and the dates on which their appointments expire, are as follows:
| Date of end of current term | |
| Mr R. L. E. Lawrence C.B.E. | 31.12.81 |
| Mr V. G. Paige C.B.E. | 14.2.82 |
| Mr J. S. Flemming | 9.9.81 |
| Mr. F. S. Law | 8.12.80 |
| Mr. D. G. MacDonald | 31.1.80 |
| Mr. J. E. B. Sieve | 14.2.83 |
| Mr. P. H. Spriddell | 9.9.81 |
| SirRonald Swayne M.C. | 8.12.80 |
asked the Minister of Transport by how much the net assets of the National Freight Corporation exceed its liabilities.
I refer my hon. Friend to the NFC's report and accounts for 1978, which contain on pages 36 to 37 a consolidated balance sheet for 31 December 1978. This indicates that liabilities exceed net assets by £10·9 million at 31 December 1978.
asked the Minister of Transport how many people are at present employed by the National Freight Corporation; and what were the equivalent figures in each of the last five years.
The NFC and its subsidiaries employ approximately 36,000 people. The equivalent figures in each of the last five years are as follows:
| 1974 | 49,400 |
| 1975 | 44,600 |
| 1976 | 41,700 |
| 1977 | 40,100 |
| 1978 | 36,500 |
Road Track Costs
asked the Minister of Transport, in the compilation of total road track costs for 1979–80, what sums were included under motorway mainten- ance for (a) lighting, (b) sweeping and cleaning and (c) patrolling.
The three-year average of road expenditure used in the track cost calculations for 1979–80£2,171 millions—include estimated expenditure on the following items for motorways, sweeping, cleaning and patrols £2·0 million, lighting £3·5 million. Patrol costs cannot be separated.
Heavy Vehicles
asked the Minister of Transport when the Transport and Road Research Laboratory hopes to report on the studies begun in 1978 into possible damage to gas mains, water mains and other underground pipelines from heavy vehicles.
It is hoped to issue a report by the end of this year on the first phase of research on stresses resulting from rolling and static wheel loads from heavy goods vehicles. Work on the second phase concerning the effects of impact loading caused by road irregularities has just commenced.
asked the Minister of Transport whether the Transport and Road Research Laboratory or any other body at the request of his Department is conducting research into the effects on older buildings of ground borne or airborne vibration from heavy vehicles; and if any such research is planned for 1980–81.
No. The scope for research in this field is being reviewed at present.
asked the Minister of Transport when the Government are going to act on the recommendations of the Foster committee report of November 1978 on the licensing of heavy lorries.
asked the Minister of Transport whether he has completed his assessment of Professor Fosters' recommendations of November 1978 for better enforcement of controls on lorry operators; and if he will now announce his intentions.
My assessment is now virtually complete and I shall be publishing the Government's response to the Foster report as soon as possible. This will set out in detail the changes I propose to introduce.
Scotland
Employment (Orkney And Shetland)
40.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what are his estimates of the numbers who will be directly employed in handling oil from the North Sea in (a) Orkney and (b) Shetland by 1985.
On present plans I am advised by the oil companies concerned that by 1985 employment at Flotta, Orkney, and Sullom Voe, Shetland, oil terminals will be 450 and 550 respectively. In addition, 210 will be engaged in the operation of the Sullom Voe Harbour.
Skillcentres
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what changes he has in mind in the foreseeable future in the provision of courses and places at skill-centres in Scotland.
A review of skillcentre provision is being made by the Manpower Services Commission, in which Dumbarton skillcentre (133 available places), Port Glasgow skillcentre (99 available places) and Hillington Annexe (98 available places) have been identified as candidates for possible closure, but no decisions have yet been taken. A new skillcentre at Rutherglen is planned which will provide nearly 200 places, including 76 transferred from Hillington skillcentre; and about 100 extra places should be available in the coming year as a result of class changes. There are no plans to reduce the available range of courses.
Family Planning
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is his estimate of the cost of providing a free family planning service in Scotland.
Family planning advice and materials are provided free under the National Health Service at present except that prescription charges are payable for drugs and appliances. The estimated net cost to the Service in Scotland in the current financial year is £6·7 million, exclusive of the hospital costs of sterilisations undertaken for family planning purposes.
Teachers
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the present number of teachers registered as unemployed in each region of Scotland.
The numbers of teachers registered as unemployed in each region and island authority in Scotland on 6 December 1979—the latest date for which unemployment figures analysed by occupation are available—are set out in the table below.
| Region | Teachers registered as unemployed |
| Borders | 12 |
| Central | 65 |
| Dunfries and Galloway | 28 |
| Fife | 86 |
| Grampian | 113 |
| Highland | 48 |
| Lothian | 297 |
| Strathclyde | 429 |
| Tayside | 99 |
| Orkney | 2 |
| Shetland | 3 |
| Western Isles | 1 |
| Scotland | 1,183 |
Prescription Charges
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how much the abolition of prescription charges would cost the National Health Service in Scotland.
On the basis of the existing prescription charges the estimated cost would be £6·2 million per annum.
Dundee (Emigration)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what has been the net emigration from Dundee in each year since 1970; and what percentage of the total number was in the age group 16 to 35 years.
There are no data available from which to make firm estimates of annual migration flows at district level, but it is possible to derive from the Registrar General's annual estimates of population some indication of the estimated net migration and the figures are given in the table below. Because the figure for any individual year may include revisions relating to earlier years, the year-to-year variations are not significant, but the figures taken together give a general indication of the migration flow. No information for 1970–71 is available because the population estimates for that year were based directly on the 1971 census; estimates for 1979 are in course of preparation. Analysis by age is not generally available, but estimates made in 1975–76 and 1976–77 indicate that, respectively, 71 per cent. and 92 per cent. of the total numbers fell into the 16 to 35 ace group.
| Estimated Net Migration, Dundee City District | |
| (years to 30 June) | |
| 1971–72 | -1,100 |
| 1972–73 | -1,200 |
| 1973–74 | +400 |
| 1974–75 | -1,200 |
| 1975–76 | -300 |
| 1976–77 | -400 |
| 1977–78 | -1,100 |
Primary Schoolchildren
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is his estimate of the number of five-year-olds who will be enrolling for school in each of the next four years.
The estimated number of children who will be enrolling for the first time in education authority primary schools in Scotland in each of the next four years is given in the table below.
| Estimated number of children enrolling in education authority primary schools | |
| Year | |
| 1980–81 | 65,500 |
| 1981–82 | 61,900 |
| 1982–83 | 60,400 |
| 1983–84 | 62,900 |
Non-University Tertiary Education (Dundee)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on the future of the following institutions as autonomous bodies: the Duncan of Jordan stone college of art, Dundee, the Dundee college of education, the Dundee college of commerce, and the Dundee college of technology.
The overall provision of non-university tertiary education in the Dundee area is at present being considered by a working party containing representatives of all the institutions to which the hon. Member refers. It would be premature to comment in advance of the working party's report.
Company Closures (Dundee)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will name the companies in Dundee which have closed over the past two years; and how many jobs were lost in each case.
Closures of units in Dundee notified from 1 January 1978 to 31 December 1979 were:
| Jobs Lost | |
| Post Card and Variety Stores Ltd | 21 |
| Logan Engineering Ltd | 89 |
| John R. Adam | 16 |
| Cuthbert and Co | 18 |
| Clares Carlton | 33 |
| Buist Spinning Co. Ltd. | 122 |
| British Bakeries Ltd | 12 |
| Taybridge Products Ltd | 37 |
| Pearl Services (Dundee) Ltd | 25 |
| Hamish Murray | 27 |
| Allied Suppliers Ltd | 23 |
| Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Ltd | 14 |
Education (Costs)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the average cost of educating a pupil at (a) primary school and (b) secondary school; and how this compares with five years ago in real terms.
In 1978–79 the figures, at November 1978 prices, were:
Youth Unemployment (Dundee)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what action he has taken to reduce youth unemployment in Dundee since May 1979.
Since May 1979 a total of 1,390 young people have taken part in the youth opportunities programme in the Grampian and Tayside regions. Information about the number participating in the programme in Dundee is not readily available.These measures supplement the steps being taken by the Government to encourage industrial expansion in Dundee and to create more permanent jobs for young people and adults, which were outlined in my answer to the hon. Member on 5 November 1979.—[Vol. 973, c. 66.]
Ambulances
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what so far has been the impact of the restrictions on the use of ambulances; and what respresentations he has received about the restrictions.
Transport by ambulance continues to be available to any patient whose doctor considers this necessary. Steps were, however, taken in October to encourage economies in the use of this service, and these have led to a number of representations arising from the misunderstanding that the service was being cut, which is not the case. It is too early yet to say what effect these measures have had.
Life Imprisonment
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the average term served at release on licence by prisoners sentenced to life imprisonment who were released in each of the last five years in Scotland.
The average term served at release on licence by prisoners sentenced to life imprisonment who were released in each of the last five years in Scotland is as follows:
| 1975 | 9 years |
| 1976 | 9 years 5 months |
| 1977 | 10 years 6 months |
| 1978 | 10 years 1 month |
| 1979 | 10 years 4 months |
Unemployment (Lanarkshire)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish the annual average unemployment figures for Hamilton subdistrict of Lan- arkshire and Larkhall subdistrict of Lanarkshire; and if he will express these figures as actual and percentages of the total.
It is not possible to provide information in the precise form requested since separate unemployment rates for the Hamilton and Larkhall sub districts are not available. In 1979 the average numbers unemployed in these areas were 2,717 and 935, respectively. The average percentage rate in 1979 for the North Lanarkshire travel-to-work area, which also includes Airdrie, Bellshill, Blantyre, Coatbridge, Motherwell, Shotts, Uddingston and Wishaw employment office areas, was 11·7 per cent.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish the actual and percentage unemployment figures for Lanarkshire district for May 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978 and 1979.
The figures for which the hon. Member asks will require calculation and I shall write to him as soon as possible.
Devolution
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what progress has been made to establish talks about the government of Scotland.
Following discussions between the Government and the other parties represented in Scotland talks are to be established on ways of improving the government of Scotland through changes in the way Scottish business is handled in Parliament. The Labour Party has already agreed to take part and my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and I still hope to secure the participation of the other two parties.
Scottish Law Commission (Research Projects)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many of the research projects on the social aspects of diligence, conducted by the central research unit of the Scottish Office on behalf of the Scottish Law Commission have now been finalised; and when the results were forwarded to the Commission.
I have been asked to reply.Draft reports on five of the eight projects referred to in paragraph 37 of the thirteenth annual report of the Scottish Law Commission were received by the Commission between September 1979 and January 1980. Draft reports on the remaining three projects—the Edinburgh University study of the social impact of diligence on debtors, the Central Research Unit review of creditors' policies, and the role of helping organisations in providing an advisory and counselling service for debtors—are being prepared. All these reports are expected to be finalised during 1980.
Environment
Derelict Mineral Workings (Restoration)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will indicate for the last year for which figures are available the grants paid for the restoration of derelict mineral workings in the United Kingdom and payment for each of the preceding five years.
Information for the whole of the United Kingdom is not readily available in the form requested. In particular, information about grants paid specifically for the restoration of derelict mineral workings is not recorded separately from information about grants for other types of reclamation.For England, total grant paid in the last six years for the reclamation of all forms of dereliction arising from past industrial activities was as follows:
| 1973–74 | £ 4·4 million |
| 1974–75 | £ 4·5 million |
| 1975–76 | £ 7·5 million |
| 1976–77 | £ 8·7 million |
| 1977–78 | £10·5 million |
| 1978–79 | £13·0 million |
Soviet Embassy
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will now withdraw planning permission for the extension to the Soviet Embassy following the Soviet Government's invasion of Afghanistan.
As the embassy is on Crown land, any planning consents relat- ing to it would be dealt with under the non-statutory procedures described in my Department's circular 7/77, a copy of which is in the Library. No such planning consents have been granted in recent years.
Nuclear Waste
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if, further to his reply to the hon. Member for Wolver Hampton, North-East (Mrs. Short) Official Report, 3 December 1979, column 81, he will explain why British Nuclear Fuels Ltd. is designing new plant to reduce substantially the discharges to sea of the more radiologically significant isotopes such as cassium and strontium, given that he claims such discharges to be environmentally of low significance.
My reply to the hon. Member for Wolver Hampton, North-East (Mrs. Short) stated that the discharges to sea from Wind scale of plutonium 241 are environmentally of low significance. BNFL's new plant is designed to reduce the discharges to sea of the more radiologically significant isotopes such as caesium and strontium. Discharges of these isotopes are within the limits authorised jointly by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment and my right hon. Friend the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food under the Radioactive Substances Act 1960, and do not constitute a hazard to public health. The authorising Departments, however, follow the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection in requiring that disposal practices should be optimised to ensure that radiation exposure resulting from discharges is kept as low as is reasonably achievable. The liquid discharge authorisation for Wind-scale will therefore be revised when the new plant comes into operation.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he intends to allow the extension of the area at Drigg in Cumbria for the disposal of more low-level nuclear waste or to use that site for the burial of medium-level waste and plutonium.
I am not aware of any proposals by British Nuclear Fuels Limited to extend the area of the Drigg disposal site or to use the site for the burial of medium-level waste or low-level waste containing more than minute traces of plutonium.
Wildlife And Countryside Bill
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he intends to place the Wildlife and Countryside Bill before Parliament.
Due to pressure on parliamentary time, the introduction of the Wildlife and Countryside Bill has had to be postponed. I intend to introduce the Bill, however, as soon as parliamentary time permits.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has completed his consultations on the Wildlife and Countryside Bill; and if the Bill will be introduced in the present Session.
As my right hon. Friend said in his reply today to my hon. Friend the Member for Huntingdonshire (Mr. Major), the introduction of the Wildlife and Countryside Bill has had to be postponed. This will provide an opportunity for further consultations on some of the proposals. My right hon. Friend intends to introduce the Bill as soon as parliamentary time permits.
Air Crash (Wisbech)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish in the Official Report the loss to the various local services entailed by the Wisbech air disaster of 21 September; and when and by whom compensation was effected.
I do not have this information. The local authorities and other bodies responsible for the provision of local services may be able to inform the hon. Member.I understand that Cambridge shire county council, the Fenland district council and the Anglian water authority are preparing to submit claims for compensation to the Ministry of Defence.
Community Land (Release)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is his policy in regard to making land available for the private sector which is at present in the hands of local authorities, having been acquired under the Community Land Act, but is not being used for housing purposes.
Authorities should dispose of such land as quickly as possible.
Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs
British Passport (Zambia)
asked the Lord Privy Seal if he will inquire into the circumstances and reason for issue of passport CO 85232 by the British High Commission in Zambia; and what rights attach to this passport.
Passport No. CO 85232A was issued at the British High Commission at Lusaka on 1. February 1978 under the special arrangements made for the issue of concessionary United Kingdom passports to citizens of Rhodesia, announced in the House by the then Attorney-General on 17 June 1968. The issue of such a passport confers no new rights on the holder.
Saudi Arabia, Somalia And Kenya
asked the Lord Privy Seal if he has had any recent consultations with Saudi Arabia, Somalia or Kenya regarding co-operation in defence matters.
My right hon. Friend has had no recent discussions regarding co-operation in defence matters with these countries. However, as my hon. Friend will be aware, my right hon. and noble Friend recently visited Saudi Arabia and defence was one of the issues discussed.
Mr Peter Young
asked the Lord Privy Seal if he will make a statement about the detention of Mr. Peter Young, a student at Aberdeen university by the Polish authorities at Warsaw airport and elsewhere; what investigations his Department made into the circumstances of Mr. Young's detention; whether Mr. Young was, or was not attempting to take prohibited crystal out of Poland; and whether Mr. Young's conduct, or that of the Polish authorities, was, or was not, in breach of the Helsinki agreement.
Mr. Young had already been released before we were informed of his short detention. On return to London he called at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and gave a brief account of the incident. He has not yet provided sufficient information to indicate whether the actions of the Polish authorities were in accordance with the Helsinki Final Act.
Soviet Embassy
asked the Lord Privy Seal what is the current size of the staff at the Soviet Embassy; what it has been in each of the last 10 years; and what steps he proposes to take to ensure its reduction following the Soviet Government's invasion of Afghanistan.
Strict limits on the size of the Soviet Embassy in London were imposed by the British Government in September 1971. Since then, the embassy has had 47 diplomatic staff and 46 non-diplomatic staff. Numbers in the immediately preceding period were:April 1971:83 diplomatic staff61 non-diplomatic staffOctober 1970:79 diplomatic staff56 non-diplomatic staffThe Government have no plans at present to seek further reductions.
Diplomatic Personnel
asked the Lord Privy Seal how many Soviet Union diplomatic personnel are in the United Kingdom; and how many United Kingdom diplomatic personnel there are in the Soviet Union.
Forty-seven members of the Soviet Embassy in London have diplomatic status as against 48 members of the British Embassy in Moscow. In addition, the Soviet Embassy in London has 46 non-diplomatic staff and the British Embassy in Moscow 38.
Cyprus
asked the Lord Privy Seal when Her Majesty's Government last consulted the two other guarantor powers under the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee concerning independence and territorial independence of the Republic of Cyprus; and when next they intend to do so.
The last formal consultations with the other guarantor powers took place in July 1974. The Government have no plans for further formal consultations, though we are in regular contact with all parties concerned about the Cyprus problem.
Uganda (Diplomatic Relations)
asked the Lord Privy Seal if the Government of Uganda are a party to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961.
Yes. Uganda acceded to the convention on 15 April 1965.
Iraq (Diplomatic Relations)
asked the Lord Privy Seal if the Government of Iraq are a party to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961.
Yes. Iraq ratified the convention on 15 October 1963.
Rhodesia
asked the Lord Privy Seal which countries have not yet lifted sanctions against the colony of Southern Rhodesia.
We are not aware of any country, whose trade is potentially significant to Rhodesia, which has indicated that it will continue to apply sanctions.
asked the Lord Privy Scat whether he will list the alleged breaches of the ceasefire in Southern Rhodesia, indicating the nature of the breach, the area in which it took place, the alleged wrongdoers and the general source of the information on which the Governor relied.
There have been incidents, some of them minor, almost daily. I do not think any useful purpose would be served by trying to tabulate them at any one particular moment. Information is primarily received from the monitoring force, but also from the military commanders of the Patriotic Front and Rhodesian forces.Of the average daily level of incidents since the ceasefire came into force on 28 December, in which violence has been used or threatened, a high proportion has been attributable to ZANLA.
asked the Lord Privy Seal whether the Governor of Southern Rhodesia has publicised any steps to be taken to deal with the members of the Patriotic Front who volunteered to go to the assembly areas after the deadline.
Yes. On completion of the disengagement from the rendezvous points to the assembly places the Governor issued a statement announcing that any members of the Patriotic Front who had not assembled should identify themselves to the local authorities, the police or the monitoring force. Provided they conducted themselves peacefully, they would be conducted, without their weapons, to join the Patriotic Front forces who had already assembled.
asked the Lord Privy Seal whether the Governor of Southern Rhodesia has ordered that those who wished to go to assembly areas after the deadline should give up their weapons.
Yes.
asked the Lord Privy Seal on how many occasions the Governor of Southern Rhodesia has asked (a) the former Rhodesian security forces and (b) the former ZANLA or ZIPRA forces to assist in dealing with alleged breaches of the ceasefire; and whether these requests have all been approved by all the leaders of the respective forces.
The details which the hon. Member seeks are not readily available. The Governor has made extensive use of Patriotic Front military commanders and liaison officers to deal with potentially dangerous situations. Under the Lancaster House agreement it is the responsibility of the police to maintain law and order. But where they are unable to cope the Governor is entitled to use such other forces as have accepted his authority. It is a matter for the Governor's judgment which forces to use in the light of the situation.
asked the Lord Privy Seal whether the Governor of Southern Rhodesia has obtained a report from the Commonwealth monitoring force in Southern Rhodesia on the incident in which several ZIPRA guerillas who volunteered to go to an assembly area were shot dead; and if so, whether he will now publish it.
This incident is being investigated. The ZIPRA group was not complying with the ceasefire regulations.
asked the Lord Privy Seal whether the Election Commissioner has investigated whether Bishop Muzorewa's ANC has booked all the buses in Rhodesia during the election campaign; and, if so, what steps the Governor intends to take.
I have consulted the Election Commissioner, to whom no party has submitted any complaint on this matter. All parties in Rhodesia have held election rallies throughout the country in recent weeks, using large numbers of buses, and there is no evidence locally that transport has not been and is not still readily available to all.
asked the Lord Privy Seal whether the Governor intends to set financial limits for the parties in the forthcoming election in Rhodesia; and whether the parties will be forced to divulge the source of their funds.
No. The only commitment under the Lancaster House agreement is for parties to disclose the level of their election expenditure but not the source of their funds.
asked the Lord Privy Seal whether the Governor will use his powers to ensure that the parties have equal access to offices, telephones, printing facilities, broadcasting, press facilities and public address systems during the forthcoming election campaign in Rhodesia.
It has been agreed that all parties contesting the common roll seats will be allocated equal broadcasting time. Any complaints about alleged unfair treatment concerning the election campaign may be raised in the Election Council. The Election Commissioner will then decide what action to take.
asked the Lord Privy Seal why it is necessary for the United Nations Commissioner for Refugees to make an appeal for funds to cope with the problems of the refugees returning to Southern Rhodesia.
The United Nations High Commisioner for Refugees' co-ordinating role in the repatriation of refugees imposes a financial burden over and above his general fund budget.
asked the Lord Privy Seal whether the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees will have any role in ensuring that refugees returning to Southern Rhodesia get the vote in the election.
Refugees who have returned to Rhodesia by the time of the elections and meet the qualifications for voting will be able to do so.
asked the Lord Privy Seal whether Her Majesty's Government have responsible for refugee citizens of Southern Rhodesia wishing to return from Zambia, Botswana and Mozambique.
The responsibility for ensuring the return of refugees and making arrangements for their reception will be shared by Her Majesty's Government, the neighbouring States and international organisations. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees has agreed to undertake the co-ordination.
asked the Lord Privy Seal if the continual call-up of Southern Rhodesians to the Southern Rhodesia security forces is being carried out with the consent of the Governor.
Yes. The routine call-up continues in order to maintain forces under the Governor's control in an efficient State.
asked the Lord Privy Seal if the Governor will arrange for refugees from Mozambique, Botswana and Zambia, whom the responsible authorities do not return to Southern Rhodesia in time for the elections, to be able to vote while in those neighbouring countries.
The Government have concluded that this would not be practicable. The aim is to secure the return to Rhodesia of as many refugees as possible before the elections.
asked the Lord Privy Seal when South Africans with heavier weapons were first deployed on the Southern Rhodesian side of the Be it bridge, and on whose initiative.
The Government's concern is with the present position, which is that a detachment of South African forces is deployed with the Governor's authority to defend the bridge. This follows consultation with the South Africans.
Defence
North Sea (Defence)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he is satisfied that British North Sea interests are sufficiently protected from surprise attack; and if he will make a statement.
Royal Navy vessels and Royal Air Force Nimrod aircraft carry out regular deterrent and surveillance patrols of our installations in the North Sea. Specially trained forces are also available to intervene on them at short notice if needed. This capability will be further enhanced following the formation of a new Royal Marine company in May whose duties will include reacting to incidents on offshore rigs. I am satisfied that these arrangements respond suitably to the need to protect our interests in the North Sea from surprise attack and to deal with possible emergencies.
Iranian Service Men (Training)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will cease to provide facilities for training Iranian Service men.
I refer the hon. Gentleman to the answer which my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister gave to the hon. Member for Ormskirk (Mr. Kilroy-Silk) on 18 January.—[Vol 976, c. 870.]
Russian Spy Trawlers
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many Russian spy trawlers he estimates are currently situated off the British coast.
For much of the year a specially equipped Soviet intelligence collection vessel (AGI) is stationed on patrol in the Malin Head area. A second AGI has occasionally been stationed in the area of the English Channel and North Sea. No AGI has been stationed in either area since late October 1979.
Air Crash (Wisbech)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence (1) if he will explain his reasons for not making a statement on the findings of the Wisbech air crash as promised in his correspondence over the last 16 weeks;(2) what he meant in internal memorandum D/D58/2064(16/80), sent to the hon. Member for Isle of Ely by the sentence
"this PQ has been tabled to permit a written reply to be published".
It would have been improper to have made any form of statement until the inquest had been completed on 14 January. It then proved impossible to make an oral statement as soon as I would have wished and rather than delay matters further it was decided to make a full written statement in reply to the question by my hon. Friend the Member for Perth and East Perthshire (Mr. Walker).
asked the Secretary of State for Defence why he sent to the hon. Member for Isle of Ely a draft answer and four pages of press cuttings on the Wisbech air crash when his Department had promised to provide an advance copy of his reply to a written parliamentary question.
I regret that a clerical error in my office caused the hon. Member to receive a copy of internal departmental correspondence, rather than the material which I had intended he should receive. For this I tender my apologies.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence why, in his written answer to the hon. Member for Perth and East Perthshire (Mr. Walker) he decided to omit the section on claims in the original draft.
In the event I decided, after considering the advice I had received, not to omit the material on claims.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will explain the omission of one or two of the courtesies which are not really called for in a written reply as set down in his memorandum from the Head of DS8, which was sent to the hon. Member for Isle of Ely.
Because it is customary for written answers to parliamentary questions to adopt a style slightly different from that used for oral statements.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will give the reasons for the 16-week delay between the Wisbech air crash and the publication of his Department's findings at the coroner's inquest.
The accident investigation was pursued as swiftly as possible, but it was not complete until shortly before Christmas. Thereafter it would have been improper to have released information on the outcome of the investigation in advance of the reconvened inquest.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish in the Official Reportthe names of the pilots of the Harrier aircraft which collided over Wisbech on 21 September; and why representatives from his Department did not attend the inquest into the deaths of three civilians caused by the crash.
It has never been the practice to release the names of the RAF pilots involved in accidents such as this, nor would it assist parliamentary or public understanding of the circumstances were we to do so. My Department was represented formally at the inquest by a solicitor acting for the Department and by a senior RAF officer who was called as a witness. MOD officials were also present as observers.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish in the Official Reportdetails of the composition of the board of inquiry into the Wisbech air crash of September, the date on which it met, the duration of these meetings and the number of people who gave evidence.
No. This would not be in accordance with normal practice.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what was the total sum paid in compensation to the relatives of the victims of the Wisbech air crash of 21 September.
A total of £31,500 has so far been paid to the relatives of those who died. Negotiations are continuing on other claims.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish in the Official Reportthe dates upon which compensation was paid to the various householders whose homes were demolished in the Wisbech air crash of 21 September and set out the reasons for the individual delays.
Three houses were demolished as a result of the crash on 21 September. Initial payments were made to two of the families on 26 and 27 September, the third family having said that a preliminary payment was not required. Further payments, mainly for loss of houses and contents, were made to all three families, either as they requested them or as parts of their claims reached the settlement stage, on 5 and 7 November, 11, 18 and 19 December, 7, 11—two payments—and 15 January.A substantial interim offer made to one of the families on 20 December has not yet been taken up. Some payments have also been made by insurance companies, who will no doubt seek recovery from my Department. I am sorry that negotiations to reach agreed valuations of two of the demolished houses took longer than I would have hoped.
Offshore Patrol Vessel
asked the Secretary of State for Defence when he expects to announce his decision on the choice of an offshore patrol vessel to replace the Ton class vessel; and if he will make a statement.
Interdepartmental consideration of the options is well advanced and I expect a decision to be made in the near future.
Harrier Aircraft
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the cost of replacing two Harrier aircraft.
It will not be necessary to purchase extra Harrier aircraft—beyond those already delivered or on order—specifically to replace those lost in the Wisbech accident.
Thrust Vectoring Exercises
asked the Secretary of State for Defence why thrust vectoring exercises do or should take place over land rather than over the sea.
Among RAF aircraft only the Harriers have the capability of thrust vectoring in forward flight. The technique has been in use for some 10 years and is not intrinsically dangerous. The Harrier is also a relatively short range aircraft and those parts of the airspace over the southern North Sea which are within range of their base at Wittering already containa considerable density of other air traffic and airspace restrictions. For these practical reasons Harriers must continue to perform such training overland. Some other aircraft with longer range do, however, carry out a good deal of air combat training over the sea.
Pilot Error (Disciplinary Action)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what degree of pilot error would cause disciplinary action to be taken by the Royal Air Force.
Error, amounting to neglect in relation to flying duty, which is both blameworthy and deserving of punishment and which can be proved by evidence admissible in a court of law to the degree of certainty required in a criminal case.
Olympic Games (Moscow)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will take steps to ensure the security and safe return of the many British nationals who will be on Russian soil during the Olympic Games in Moscow.
I have been asked to reply.On such occasions we look to the Government of the host country to fulfill their responsibility for the well-being of British nationals on their soil.
Social Services
Special Hospitals
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many patients currently detained in each of the special hospitals have been in special hospitals for (a) less than five years, (b)
| Broadmoor | Rampton | Moss Side | Park Lane | |||||
| 0–5 years | … | … | … | … | 328 | 294 | 132 | 20 |
| 5–10 years | … | … | … | … | 215 | 283 | 113 | 30 |
| 10–15 years | … | … | … | … | 91 | 136 | 73 | 14 |
| 15–20 years | … | … | … | … | 40 | 53 | 22 | 2 |
| 20–25 years | … | … | … | … | 19 | 27 | 14 | 0 |
| 25–30 years | … | … | … | … | 12 | 16 | 11 | 1 |
| 30–40 years | … | … | … | … | 13 | 11 | 4 | 0 |
| Over 40 years | … | … | … | … | 2 | 15 | 4 | 0 |
| Total | … | … | … | … | 720 | 835 | 373 | 67 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many patients were transferred from special to local hospitals during 1976, 1977 and 1978; and how many were accepted by each area health authority.
The number of patients transferred from special to local hospitals was as follows:
| 1976 | 148 |
| 1977 | 142 |
| 1978 | 166 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he is satisfied that patients who are less than 16 years of age in special hospitals are receiving adequate full-time education.
There are only two patients under the age of 16 years. Both regularly attend the hospital school—which is managed by the local education authority—to the maximum extent to which the responsible medical officer, in consultation with the teaching staff and between five and 10 years, (c) between 10 and 15 years, (d) between 15 to 20 years, (e) between 20 and 25 years, (f) between 25 and 30 years, (g) between 30 and 40 years. and (h) more than 40 years.
At 31 December 1979, patients in the special hospitals had been detained for the following periods:other members of the clinical team responsible for their treatment, think desirable having regard to their mental condition and to other treatment needs. I am advised that at the moment both the boys are currently attending classes for at least as long a period as it is likely they would were they not in hospital, taking account of the longer school term at the hospital.
Brent And Harrow Area Health Authority
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) why the sum of £1,100,000 was withheld from the payments due from his Department to the Brent and Harrow area health authority; and if he will make a statement;(2) why he has spread the repayment of funds due to the Brent and Harrow area health authority over a period of four years; what is his estimate of the extra interest incurred as a result of his decision; and if he will now increase the funds to the area health authority by the sum that has been thereby lost.
This arises from a review of the special funding of Northwick Park hospital as a national research centre. This funding is being carried out in stages. I will be glad to let the hon. Member have the full details by letter.
Invalid Tricycles
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) how many engine-powered tricycles are in the reserve stock; and what is the average intake at the latest date available;(2) how many engine-powered tricycles have been taken from the reserve stock to be used as replacements during July 1979 and to the last available date.
Some 1,750 three-wheelers are held locally for temporary loan and approximately 1,000 petrol-engined three-wheelers are stored centrally. Although weekly movements into and out of store have averaged, respectively, 20 and 14 over the past six months, only 12 were issued during last July. The vehicles in store will provide an essential source of replacements for several years for existing users who continue to use three-wheelers and to whom an undertaking has been given that they will not become immobilised unless increasing disablement makes this inevitable.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many approved repairers of invalid tricycles were on the Government list in July 1976 compared with the same month in 1979.
107 and 97 respectively.
St Bartholomew's Hospital
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what emergency casualty services are available at St. Bartholomew's hospital, London, at night; what representations he has received about services provided by the hospital; and if he will make a statement.
St. Bartholomew's hospital maintains a full 24-hour accident and emergency service. Various representations have been made to me about certain reductions in some of the hospital's services as part of the economy measures taken by the City and East London AHA(T). Health authorities are required to plan their expenditure to keep within their cash limits. They are expected to look at their priorities carefully and to make any savings necessary in ways which will do the least damage to patient services.
Sterilisation (Children)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many children aged 16 years or under were sterilised in each of the years 1975 to 1979 inclusive.
This information is not available centrally. A sample of hospital in-patient episodes is collected centrally for the age group 0–14 but the sampling error with the extremely small number involved is considered to be too large to give reliable estimates.
Children In Care
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will estimate (a) the current number of children in care, (b) the percentage of parents who makes a contribution to their child's support even though the child is in care and (c) the average size of such payments.
It is estimated that approximately 95,000 children are currently in care in England. In the financial year 1977–78 local authorities in England collected parental contributions of £2·2 million towards the cost of maintaining children in care, but information about the number of parents contributing is not available centrally.
Rampton Hospital (Review)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will make a statement about the work and progress of the Rampton review team in the light of Sir John Boynton's current commitments in Zimbabwe-Rhodesia.
As I explained in my reply to the hon. Member for Grimsby (Mr. Mitchell) on 17 December last, the review team has been working in small groups studying different aspects of the hospital's reorganisation.—[Vol. 976, c. 90.] Sir John Boynton is keeping in close touch with progress and is available for consultation on matters of importance. The team's vice-chairman, Dr. J. M. Roberts, is acting for Sir John in his absence. The team still hopes, as it announced after its first meeting in September, to report not later than the summer of this year.
Departmental Research
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what was the research budget of his Department for the last five years and the next year, broken down by major groups; what projects on electronic communications aids have been funded by his Department in the last two years; and what discussion his Department has had with a view to developing exports of electronic aids for handicapped people.
Details of the Department's research budget for the financial years 1975–76 to 1980–81 are given in the following table. This is followed by a list of the projects on electronic communication aids funded in the two years 1978–79
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SECURITY RESEARCH EXPENDITURE | ||||||||||
| £000 | ||||||||||
| Subject | 1975–76 | 1976–77 | 1977–78 | 1978–79 | 1979–80* | 1980–81* | ||||
| Health services | … | … | … | 3,433 | 3,684 | 4,134 | 4,364 | 4,999 | 5,896 | |
| Personal social services and services to children, elderly and handicapped persons | … | … | 2,153 | 2,594 | 2,887 | 3,456 | 4,968 | 6,486 | ||
| Social security | … | … | … | 278 | 280 | 329 | 352 | 400 | 450 | |
| National Health Service building and engineering | … | … | … | 735 | 922 | 850 | 1,260 | 1,439 | 1,495 | |
| National Health Service equipment and appliances and supplies | … | 1,991 | 2,316 | 1,764 | 1,825 | 2,955 | 3,342 | |||
| Computers in National Health Service | … | … | … | … | 2,543 | 2,800 | 2,094 | 2,005 | 2,356 | 2,830 |
| Research commissioned on the Medical Research Council | … | 8,128 | 8,936 | 8,920 | 10,740 | 11,346 | 12,165 | |||
| Locally organised research scheme | 1,863 | 2,098 | 2,103 | † | † | † | ||||
| TOTAL | … | … | … | 21,124 | 23,630 | 23,081 | 24,002 | 28,463 | 32,664 | |
| * Provisional figures. | ||||||||||
| † Decentralised to the National Health Service. | ||||||||||
| PROJECTS FUNDED BY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SECURITY IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AIDS DURING 1978 AND 1979:— | ||||||||||
| Study of design features of post-aural hearing aids (Royal National Institute for the Deaf). | ||||||||||
| Evaluation of frequency transposing hearing aid (Goldsmith College, London). | ||||||||||
| Evaluation of aids for daily living for the deaf. | ||||||||||
| Graded dynamic compression in hearing aids (National hospital for nervous diseases, London). | ||||||||||
| Acoustic modifications to hearing aids to give improved performance. | ||||||||||
| Evaluation of Palantype as a communication aid for the profoundly deaf. | ||||||||||
| Studies on various aspects of hearing aid earmoulds and also of patterns of use of hearing aids. | ||||||||||
Unemployment Review Officers
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many unemployment review officers work for his Department; what are their functions; and how many people were reviewed by them in 1979.
Not all unemployment review officers are engaged full-time on unemployment review, but the number is now roughly the equivalent of 600 full-time posts. These officers help and encourage supplementary benefit claimants who have been unemployed for lengthy periods to return to work. We shall soon be extending these procedures to people receiving un supplemented unemployment benefit and initially 60 1979–80. The Department has regular discussions with manufacturers concerned with the export of a wide range of medical equipment including electronic aids. Problems of communication for the handicapped are also considered in the Department's continuous liaison with the Post Office and the National Physical Laboratory. Although primarily directed towards the needs of our own handicapped population, any outcome—for example, the NPL "MASCOT"—should have export potential.officers will be allocated to handle these cases.During 1978 unemployment review officers invited for interview 218,598 unemployed supplementary benefit claimants. The number reviewed during 1979 is not yet available.
Industrial Disputes (Benefits)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when he expects to bring forward proposals to amend the entitlement of those engaged in industrial disputes to claim supplementary benefits on behalf of their dependants.
I cannot yet say when our review of this matter will be completed.
Ambulance Service (Greater London)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish in the Official Reporta table showing the amount spent by the ambulance service on hired cars and taxis in each of the districts within the area health authorities in the Greater London area in 1979.
This information is not available centrally.
Married Women (Invalidity Pension)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he has now received the report of the National Insurance Advisory Committee on non-contributory invalidity pension for married women; and if he will publish its recommendations.
I have not yet received this report and I refer my hon. Friend to my reply to the hon. Member for Grimsby (Mr. Mitchell) on 10 December.—[Vol. 975, c. 487–8.]
Vaccine-Damaged Children
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what compensation presently exists for vaccine-damaged children; what proposals he has for the future; and if he will make a statement.
Under the Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 provision exists for payment of £10,000 in respect of persons who are severely damaged by vaccination and who meet the requirements of the Act. Some 350 awards have been made and 1,100 claims await review by independent tribunals.My right hon. Friend has no proposals for further legislation specifically about vaccine damage, but improved provision for the disabled generally, including the vaccine-damaged, will be one of the Government's priorities when resources become available.
Hospitals (Closures)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, in the light of the fact that separately identified costs are not available for cottage or community hospitals, if he will undertake not to agree to the closure of any such hospitals until such costs have been fully evaluated.
The terms "cottage" and "community" are not recognised in the hospital classification scheme under which statistics are collected by the Department; thus, no estimate can be made of national average costs in such hospitals. Health authorities will, however, know the running costs of individual hospitals for which they are responsible and I would expect such information to be taken fully into account by them when considering possible hospital closures.
Child Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what would be the net cost of increasing child benefit to (a) £6, (b) £8 and (c) £10 per week; and what would be the net cost of making such increases payable only in respect of second and subsequent children.
The net cost would be of the order of:
| £ billion | ||
| all children | second and subsequent children | |
| (a) | 1¼ | ½ |
| (b) | 2½ | 1 |
| (c) | 3¾ | 3¾ |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish a table comparing, at constant November 1979 prices, for a single-wage married couple with two children aged 8 years and 12 years, and for a single-wage married couple with three children aged 8, 12 and 17 years, the value of £4 child benefits with the value of family allowance/child benefit plus child tax allowances in April 1960, April 1970, April 1976 and November 1978, assuming (a) standard rate taxpayers in each case and (b) that the families earned 50 per cent., 75 per cent. and 100 per cent. of average male manual earnings in each case.
I shall let my hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.
Maternity Payment
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is his estimate, for each of the past 10 years, of the number of babies born to mothers dependent on supplementary benefit, and not eligible for maternity grant.
The information requested is not available. However, for the purpose of a recent exercise, it was estimated from all the available data for 1978 that the number involved was broadly of the order of 12,000.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he intends to make standard conditions governing the authorisation and value of exceptional needs payments to expectant mothers dependent on supplementary benefit, and ineligible for maternity grant.
Under the Social Security Bill, which is currently before the House, all rules governing exceptional needs payments will be standardised in regulations.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish a table showing rates of pre-natal, post-natal and maternity allowances, as appropriate, in each member State of the EEC and in Sweden, expressed in local currencies.
| Ages | |||||||||
| Number | 17–24 | 25–34 | 35–44 | 45–54 | 55–59 | 60–64 | |||
| Camden | … | … | 29 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Cedars Lodge | … | 16 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | — | |
| Total | … | … | 45 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 3 |
| Weeks in residence | ||||||||
| Less than 1 | 1 but less than 6 | 6 but less than 13 | 13 but less than 26 | 26 but less than 52 | 52 or more | |||
| Camden | … | … | 11 | 8 | 5 | 5 | — | — |
| Cedars Lodge | … | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | |
The rates of such allowances in each of the member States of the EEC are set out in "Comparative Social Security Tables for Member States of the European Communities" published by the Department. A copy of the latest version of the tables, showing the position at 1 January 1979, is available in the Library of the House.The latest information we have on rates of benefit in Sweden relates to June 1976. At that date, an expectant mother satisfying the insurance and other conditions for parenthood benefit could receive between 25 Kr. and 179 Kr. a day—according to income—from the 60th day before the expected birth to the 29th day after the birth. Thereafter the benefit could be paid to whichever parent had care of the child, up to a maximum of 210 days in total.
Reception And Resettlement
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many women were in each reception centre or resettlement unit on the latest available date; what their ages were; how long each had been in residence; and what was the number in each institute who fell within section 2 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977.
There are only two centres which accommodate women, Camden and Cedars Lodge. The information requested is as follows. The figures relate to 30 November 1979.
Homeless Persons
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many of the 600 homeless single persons in reception centres on the night of 21 June who fell within section 2 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977, were women; and if be will state their ages and disability.
The figure of 600 includes 24 women who, if discharged from the reception centres, might have been regarded as in priority need as defined in section 2 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977. Of these, one was pregnant and the others were considered by the lay staff of the centres to be vulnerable because of their apparent mental and physical condition. Their ages were as follows:
- 17–24, 2
- 25–34, 6
- 35–44,7
- 45–54, 3
- 55–59, 2
- 60 and over, 4
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many beds for single homeless women are provided by the voluntary sector.
The Department does not collect information about accommodation but for some of the information he is seeking I refer the hon. Member to my reply to his question of 24 October about caring services and facilities for the homeless.—[Vol. 972, c. 213–4.]
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what was the total cost in the last year for which figures are available of meeting the rent of those homeless single people staying in private hostels, lodging homes, hotels and so on; what was the number of individuals so housed; if there is a list of approved private hostels, lodging houses and similar establishments and so on; and if so, if he will place a copy of the list in the Library.
The information requested is not available. There is no list of approved private hostels, lodging houses and so on.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many single homeless people are on Merseyside; what are the numbers of (a) reception centres, (b) resettlement units, (c) hostels, (d) lodging houses and (e) hotels and so on; catering for them on a temporary basis; how many beds are in each; and how many individuals by sex there are in each facility, in each case for the last year for which figures are available.
On Merseyside the Supplementary Benefits Commission administers on my right hon. Friend's behalf one reception centre of 61 beds for single homeless men without a settled way of living; 1,719 persons were admitted in the 12 months ended 30 November 1979. The Supplementary Benefits Commission does not administer any resettlement units in the area. The other information requested is not available.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what the number of day case centres for the single homeless is; and what financial support is given to them by his Department.
The Department does not maintain such a list. I refer the hon. Member to my reply of 24 October.—[Vol. 972, c. 213–4.]The Department does not normally fund local projects. Local authorities have the power to do so under section 65 of the Health Services and Public Health Act 1968, and the Department will contribute only exceptionally, and for a limited period, where a project is judged to be innovatory or experimental. Since 1978–79 it has been contributing on that basis to the running costs of the Coventry day centre, at a rate of £20,000 per annum, and made a capital grant of £11,000. The support will continue for a maximum of three years, after which decisions on funding will fall on the local authority.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many single homeless persons by sex were received into the Fazakerley reception centre and resettlement unit in the last year for which figures are available; how many of these fell within priority need, as defined in section 2 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977; how many of the latter were rehoused by local housing authorities, listing the housing authorities and the number each housed; and if any Merseyside local housing authorities refused to take single homeless persons from the centre-unit.
In the 12 months ended 30 November 1979, 1,719 men were admitted to Fazakerley reception centre. No estimate can be made of the number of those who, on leaving the centre might have fallen within priority need as defined in section 2 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977. However, in the period, 12 men left the centre to go direct into accommodation provided by the Liverpool city council. No Merseyside local housing authority has refused to take a man from the centre when asked to do so. Women are not accommodated at this centre.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what plans he has to ensure that those homeless single people who fall within section 2 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977 and are currently in reception centres and resettlement units actually obtain permanent council accommodation.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to his earlier related question on 29 October 1979.—[Vol. 972, c. 445.] My right hon. Friend, on whose behalf the Supplementary Benefits Commission administers reception centres—including resettlement units—similarly has no responsibility for finding permanent accommodation for people temporarily accommodated in such centres. But in appropriate cases the staff do what they can to help.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will make a statement on his policy towards the single homeless and indicate what steps he proposes to take to deal with the problem.
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Social Services is responsible for the social and health needs of the single homeless but their housing needs are the responsibility of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment. Their joint policy is to encourage co-operation at local level between social services, housing and health authorities and other agencies concerned and particularly voluntary organisations. To the extent that available resources and competing priorities permit, social services and health authorities may meet the social and health needs of single homeless people through their main programmes, enhanced, where appropriate, but the urban and joint financing programmes, and health and local authorities have powers to assist voluntary organisations. The Department is also prepared to make grants towards the headquarters costs of certain national voluntary organisations concerned and to encourage experimentation and research, and is taking part in the LBA/GLC working party on provision in London for people without a settled way of living.
Blood
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if private hospitals and clinics are now paying for blood provided by the National Health Service; if so, what price they are charged; and what the economic cost of blood is.
No charge is made to private hospitals and clinics for blood which is donated free to the National Health Service. I shall consider the question of processing and handling charges in the light of information being assembled by the Department.
Poliomyelitis
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what co-operation is being given by his Department in the Save the Children "Stop Polio" campaign; if he will institute consultations between the various national organisations concerned with such health problems; and if he will make a statement.
I wish the campaign every success; co-ordination of such international efforts is primarily the responsibility of the World Health Organisation but the Overseas Development Administration is making a financial contribution.
Chronically Sick And Disabled Persons Act
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member for Exeter of 19 December, and in view of the concern among disabled people about the possible repeal or amendment of section 2 of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act and the way in which some local authorities are cutting personal social services, if he will give an assurance that the Government will not repeal or amend section 2 and that his Department will issue guidelines to local authorities on the implementation of section 2 to ensure adequate protection of the elderly, chronically sick and disabled.
I regret that I do not expect to be in a position to add, for some considerable time, to the reply I gave to my hon. Friend on 19 December.—[Vol. 976, c. 267–8.]
Fuel Assistance Schemes
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will introduce a comprehensive scheme which will assist those excluded from the new fuel assistance scheme; and if he will make a statement.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what additional steps are proposed to help old people and large families on low incomes cope with the consequences of higher prices for gas and electricity.
I cannot at present add to what my right hon. Friend said in his statement to the House on 22 October, that the Government are aware of the need to take the cost of energy into account in developing their social policies, and will keep under review the range of help available to assist poor consumers with fuel bills.—[Vol. 972, c. 35–6.]
Departmental Transactions (Post Offices)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many transactions his Department conducted with members of the general public through post offices during the latest year for which a reliable estimate of the figure can be given.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Benefits (Payments)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether, in his review of arrangements for paying social security benefits, he will avoid taking action which would cause personal hardship for recipients or which would reduce the viability of sub-post offices, especially in rural areas.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to my hon. Friend, the Member for Huntingdonshire (Mr. Major) on 18 January.—[Vol. 976, c. 885–6.]
Abortion
asked the secretary of State for Social Services what progress has been made in authorising daycare abortion treatment in private nursing homes; and whether he will make a statement.
I am authorising day-care treatment for early abortion in eight commercial nursing homes and one nursing home belonging to a charitable trust. I am satisfied that at these nursing homes acceptable arrangements have been made for day care. Applications for approval from a further five nursing homes are under consideration.I recognise the many anxieties expressed by hon. Members in the House about late abortions and hope that these authorisations, already proved acceptable by controlled trials, will reduce to some extent the number of late abortions which can be so distressing.
Mrs June Wyatt
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what representations he has received from the hon. Member for Uxbridge and others concerning the application by Mrs. June Wyatt of 17 High Road, Cowley, Uxbridge, for additional financial assistance to enable her to make greater use of aids and equipment provided on medical advice; and if he will make a statement.
I have received representations from my hon. Friend, the Member for Uxbridge, enclosing others on the same subject. As this is, as my hon. Friend says, a difficult and complex matter I shall write to my hon. Friend as soon as possible.
Regional Health Authorities
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he ill list, separately, the number of employees of each regional health authority.Sir George Young: The information will take some little time to collect and I shall let my hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.
Chiropodists
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many trained chiropodists are employed by each local authority; how many trained and untrained chiropodists, respectively, are employed on an agency basis within the areas of each authority; and what number of full-time chiropodists each of these figures represent per 1,000 population over 65 years of age.Sir George Young [
pursuant to his reply, 22 October 1979. c. 107–109]:
Following is the table of corrected figures:
| CHIROPODISTS (WHOLE-TIME EQUIVALENT) WORKING IN EACH AREA HEALTH AUTHORITY AND PER 1,000 POPULATION IN EACH AREA OVER AGE 65 AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 1977 | ||
Chiropodists
| ||
Region and area (a) | Whole-time equivalent (b) | Whole-time equivalent per 1,000 time population over 65(c) |
| NORTHERN | ||
| Cleveland | 7·0 | 0·11 |
| Cumbria | 26·0 | 0·36 |
| Durham | 20·4 | 0·24 |
| Northumberland | 14·3 | 0·33* |
| Gateshead | 5·1 | 0·17* |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | 12·1 | 0·27 |
| North Tyneside | 5·1 | 0·18 |
| South Tyneside | 2·0 | 0·08 |
| Sunderland | 6·5 | 0·17* |
| YORKSHIRE | ||
| Humberside | 31·9 | 0·27 |
| North Yorkshire | 22·1 | 0·23 |
| Bradford | 28·9 | 0·38* |
| Calderdale | 8·1 | 0·26* |
| Kirklees | 19·3 | 0·35* |
| Leeds | 31·5 | 0·29 |
| Wakefield | 12·1 | 0·31 |
| TRENT | ||
| Derbyshire | 24·4 | 0·20 |
| Leicestershire | 29·4 | 0·27 |
| Lincolnshire | 27·3 | 0·36* |
| Nottinghamshire | 103·7 | 0·78 |
| Barnsley | 5·9 | 0·20 |
| Doncaster | 11·7 | 0·33 |
| Rotherham | 6·7 | 0·22 |
| Sheffield | 17·9 | 0·21 |
| EAST ANGLIA | ||
| Cambridgeshire | 16·9 | 0·26 |
| Norfolk | 37·6 | 0·29 |
| Suffolk | 36·5 | 0·50 |
| NORTH-WEST THAMES | ||
| Bedfordshire | 22·6 | 0·42 |
| Hertfordshire | 27·8 | 0·26 |
| Barnet | 14·3 | 0·23 |
Chiropodists
| ||
Region and area (a) | Whole-time equivalent (b) | Whole-time equivalent per 1,000 population over 65 (c) |
| Brent and Harrow | 21·0 | 0·33 |
| Ealing, Hammersmith and Hounslow | 11·6 | 0·10 |
| Hillingdon | 10·0 | 0·32 |
| Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster | 8·6 | 0·13 |
| NORTH-EAST THAMES | ||
| Essex | 48·7* | 0·25 |
| Barking and Havering | 17·8 | 0·33 |
| Camden and Islington | 43·7 | 0·77 |
| City, Hackney, Newham and Tower Hamlets | 21·3 | 0·24* |
| Enfield and Haringey | 9·5 | 0·13* |
| Redbridge and Waltham Forest | 11·1 | 0·15 |
| SOUTH-EAST THAMES | ||
| East Sussex | 28·7 | 0·19* |
| Kent | 39·5 | 0·18 |
| Bexley and Greenwich | 27·8* | 0·46 |
| Bromley | 16·0 | 0·36* |
| Lambeth, Lewisham and Southwark | 51·8 | 0·44 |
| SOUTH-WEST THAMES | ||
| Surrey | 35·6 | 0·24 |
| West Sussex | 29·7 | 0·24 |
| Croydon | 16·5 | 0·37* |
| Kingston and Richmond | 17·8 | 0·43 |
| Merton, Sutton and Wandsworth | 47·0 | 0·44* |
| WESSEX | ||
| Dorset | 12·3 | 0·10 |
| Hampshire | 37·4 | 0·22 |
| Wiltshire | 21·6 | 0·22 |
| Isle of Wight | 3·0 | 0·13 |
| OXFORD | ||
| Berkshire | 12·8 | 0·15 |
| Buckinghamshire | 33·9 | 0·62* |
| Northamptonshire | 28·9 | 0·43 |
| Oxfordshire | 19·0 | 0·31 |
| SOUTH-WESTERN | ||
| Avon | 35·2 | 0·30 |
| Cornwall and Scilly Isles | 17·1 | 0·24 |
| Devon | 34·5 | 0·19 |
| Gloucestershire | 19·9 | 0·28 |
| Somerset | 20·2 | 0·34 |
| WEST MIDLANDS | ||
| Hereford and Worcester | 33·9 | 0·41 |
| Salop | 16·1 | 0·31* |
| Staffordshire | 34·2 | 0·28 |
| Warwickshire | 13·2 | 0·23 |
| Birmingham | 18·2 | 0·12 |
| Coventry | 10·0 | 0·24* |
| Dudley | 6·4 | 0·17* |
| Sandwell | 12·0 | 0·27* |
| Solihull | 9·3 | 0·47 |
| Walsall | 9·2 | 0·30 |
| Wolverhampton | 4·2 | 0·12 |
| MERSEY | ||
| Cheshire | 27·4 | 0·24 |
| Liverpool | 28·7 | 0·35 |
| St. Helens with Knowsley | 14·6 | 0·36* |
| Sefton | 9·4 | 0·21 |
| Wirral | 14·1 | 0·26 |
Chiropodists
| ||
Region and area(a) | Whole-time equivalent(b) | Whole-time equivalent per 1,000 population over 65(c) |
| NORTH-WESTERN | ||
| Lancashire | 82·4 | 0·36 |
| Bolton | 15·3 | 0·41 |
| Bury | 15·3 | 0·62 |
| Manchester | 45·3 | 0·61 |
| Oldham | 12·8 | 0·40 |
| Rochdale | 9·4 | 0·34 |
| Salford | 26·1 | 0·69 |
| Stockport | 16·5 | 0·42 |
| Tameside | 14·9 | 0·43 |
| Trafford | 9·9 | 0·32 |
| Wigan | 18·2 | 0·46* |
* Corrected figures. | ||
Disabled Persons (Telephones)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list the number of telephones supplied to elderly disabled people by Cheshire and Lancashire county councils and each metropolitan district council in Greater Manchester and Merseyside.
The information is not available in the form requested. However, households assisted, containing persons aged 65 or over, not all of whom were necessarily disabled during 1978–79, were as follows:
| Cheshire county council | 188 |
| Lancashire county council | 671 |
| Metropolitan country | |
| Greater Manchester | |
| Bolton district | 73 |
| Bury district | 52 |
| *(Manchester district | 352) |
| Oldham district | 33 |
| Rochdale district | 27 |
| Salford district | 41 |
| Stockport district | 82 |
| Tameside district | 63 |
| Trafford district | 38 |
| Wigan district | 143 |
| Metropolitan county | |
| Merseyside | |
| Knowsley district | 35 |
| Liverpool district | 491 |
| Sefton district | 88 |
| St. Helens district | 53 |
| Wirral district | 149 |
| * The figure for Manchester metropolitan district council represents the total number of households assisted. | |
National Finance
British Gas Corporation
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he proposes to introduce either a windfall profits tax or an excess profits tax to cover surplus earnings of the British Gas Corporation.
I keep all taxation proposals under review.
Family Income
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the proportion of income, including family allowance or child benefit, paid in tax and national insurance contributions for each year since 1945 by (a) a single person, (b) a childless couple, (c) a couple with one child aged under 11 years, (d) a couple with two children, both aged under 11 years, (e) a couple with two children, one aged under 11 and one aged 11 to 16 years and (f) a couple with four children, two aged under 11 and two aged 11 to 16 years on half average earnings, three-quarters average earnings, average earnings and one and a half times average earnings, and twice average earnings.
The figures are shown in the tables. I regret that figures for every year between 1945–46 and 1964–65 could be provided only at disproportionate costs.For years up to 1969–70, the average earnings are the average weekly earnings of male manual workers aged 21 and over in manufacturing and certain other industries at October in each year. For 1970–71 to 1978–79 the figures are the averages of the figures obtained in the new earnings survey of the average weekly earnings of full-time adult male manual workers at the April of the beginning and end of each year. For 1979–80 the estimated level of earnings for September 1979—the latest month for which a figure of average earnings is available—has been used. This has been obtained by updating the figure in the new earnings survey for April 1979 of average earnings of full-time adult male manual workers taking account of the movements in a centred three-month moving average of the monthly index of average earnings of all employees covering the whole economy. Where appropriate, the figures of income include family allowance or child benefit, in addition to earnings.It has been assumed that the employees were not contracted out of the earnings-related or graduated pension schemes.
| PERCENTAGE OF INCOME PAID IN TAX AND NATIONAL INSURANCE CONTRIBUTIONS | |||||||||||||
Half average Earnings
| Three-quarters Average Earnings
| Average Earnings
| One and a half times Average Earnings
| Two times Average Earnings
| |||||||||
| Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | ||||
Single Person
| |||||||||||||
| 1945–46 | … | … | … | 12·6 | 3·1 | 18·1 | 2·0 | 23·0 | 1·6 | 30·4 | 1·0 | 34·1 | 0·8 |
| 1950–51 | … | … | … | 2·6 | 6·5 | 8·0 | 4·4 | 11·0 | 3·3 | 17·5 | 2·2 | 22·1 | 1·6 |
| 1955–56 | … | … | … | 3·7 | 5·9 | 8·6 | 3·9 | 12·7 | 3·0 | 18·9 | 2·0 | 22·4 | 1·5 |
| 1960–61 | … | … | … | 6·1 | 6·8 | 11·0 | 4·6 | 15·1 | 3·4 | 20·1 | 2·3 | 22·6 | 1·7 |
| 1964–65 | … | … | … | 7·1 | 6·5 | 12·8 | 5·7 | 17·2 | 5·3 | 21·5 | 3·6 | 23·6 | 2·7 |
| 1965–66 | … | … | … | 8·4 | 7·4 | 14·5 | 6·3 | 18·9 | 5·4 | 23·3 | 3·6 | 25·5 | 2·7 |
| 1966–67 | … | … | … | 8·9 | 7·2 | 15·1 | 6·3 | 19·3 | 5·5 | 23·6 | 3·7 | 25·7 | 2·8 |
| 1967–68 | … | … | … | 9·7 | 7·5 | 16·0 | 6·6 | 20·0 | 5·5 | 24·0 | 3·8 | 26·0 | 2·8 |
| 1968–69 | … | … | … | 10·6 | 8·2 | 17·1 | 7·4 | 20·8 | 5·6 | 24·6 | 3·9 | 26·5 | 2·9 |
| 1969–70 | … | … | … | 11·5 | 8·4 | 18·2 | 7·1 | 21·7 | 5·7 | 25·1 | 4·1 | 26·9 | 3·0 |
| 1970–71 | … | … | … | 13·7 | 8·0 | 19·8 | 6·7 | 22·9 | 5·8 | 26·0 | 4·0 | 27·5 | 3·0 |
| 1971–72 | … | … | … | 14·6 | 7·7 | 19·8 | 6·5 | 22·4 | 5·8 | 25·0 | 4·4 | 26·2 | 3·3 |
| 1972–73 | … | … | … | 10·8 | 7·3 | 17·3 | 6·4 | 20·5 | 5·9 | 23·4 | 4·8 | 25·3 | 3·6 |
| 1973–74 | … | … | … | 13·2 | 7·0 | 18·8 | 6·3 | 21·6 | 5·9 | 24·4 | 4·8 | 25·8 | 3·6 |
| 1974–75 | … | … | … | 17·0 | 6·5 | 22·3 | 6·1 | 25·0 | 5·9 | 27·7 | 4·7 | 29·0 | 3·5 |
| 1975–76 | … | … | … | 20·0 | 5·5 | 25·0 | 5·5 | 27·5 | 5·5 | 30·0 | 4·2 | 32·6 | 3·1 |
| 1976–77 | … | … | … | 20·5 | 5·7 | 25·3 | 5·8 | 27·8 | 5·8 | 30·2 | 4·0 | 33·0 | 4·0 |
| 1977–78 | … | … | … | 17·8 | 5·8 | 23·2 | 5·7 | 25·9 | 5·8 | 28·6 | 5·3 | 31·0 | 4·0 |
| 1978–79 | … | … | … | 14·5 | 6·5 | 20·7 | 6·5 | 23·7 | 6·5 | 26·8 | 6·0 | 28·4 | 4·5 |
| 1979–80 (September) | … | 15·0 | 6·5 | 20·0 | 6·5 | 22·5 | 6·5 | 25·0 | 5·9 | 26·3 | 4·4 | ||
| MARRIED COUPLE WITHOUT CHILDREN | |||||||||||||
Half average Earnings
| Three-quarters Average Earnings
| Average Earnings
| One and a half times Average Earnings
| Two times Average Earnings
| |||||||||
| Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | ||||
| 1945–46 | … | … | … | 0·1 | 3·1 | 9·9 | 2·0 | 14·7 | 1·6 | 24·0 | 1·0 | 29·3 | 0·8 |
| 1950–51 | … | … | … | — | 6·5 | 2·1 | 4·4 | 6·5 | 3·3 | 12·1 | 2·2 | 18·1 | 1·6 |
| 1955–56 | … | … | … | — | 5·9 | 3·2 | 3·9 | 7·0 | 3·0 | 14·0 | 2·0 | 18·8 | 1·5 |
| 1960–61 | … | … | … | 1·0 | 6·8 | 5·8 | 4·6 | 10·2 | 3·4 | 16·7 | 2·3 | 20·1 | 1·7 |
| 1964–65 | … | … | … | 1·0 | 6·5 | 7·4 | 5·7 | 12·2 | 5·3 | 18·2 | 3·6 | 21·2 | 2·7 |
| 1965–66 | … | … | … | 2·2 | 7·4 | 8·6 | 6·3 | 14·0 | 5·4 | 20·0 | 3·6 | 23·1 | 2·7 |
| 1966–67 | … | … | … | 2·7 | 7·2 | 9·2 | 6·3 | 14·7 | 5·5 | 20·5 | 3·7 | 23·4 | 2·8 |
| 1967–68 | … | … | … | 3·3 | 7·5 | 10·0 | 6·6 | 15·5 | 5·5 | 21·1 | 3·8 | 23·8 | 2·8 |
| 1968–69 | … | … | … | 4·6 | 8·2 | 11·6 | 7·4 | 16·7 | 5·6 | 21·8 | 3·9 | 23·4 | 2·9 |
| 1969–70 | … | … | … | 5·9 | 8·4 | 13·1 | 7·1 | 17·8 | 5·7 | 22·6 | 4·1 | 25·0 | 3·0 |
| 1970–71 | … | … | … | 5·8 | 8·0 | 14·5 | 6·7 | 18·9 | 5·8 | 23·3 | 4·0 | 25·5 | 3·0 |
| 1971–72 | … | … | … | 7·9 | 7·7 | 15·3 | 6·5 | 19·0 | 5·8 | 22·7 | 4·4 | 24·6 | 3·3 |
| 1972–73 | … | … | … | 4·9 | 7·3 | 13·3 | 6·4 | 17·5 | 5·9 | 21·7 | 4·8 | 23·8 | 3·6 |
| 1973–74 | … | … | … | 8·1 | 7·0 | 15·4 | 6·3 | 19·0 | 5·9 | 22·7 | 4·8 | 24·5 | 3·6 |
| 1974–75 | … | … | … | 10·9 | 6·5 | 18·3 | 6·1 | 21·9 | 5·9 | 25·6 | 4·7 | 27·5 | 3·5 |
| 1975–76 | … | … | … | 13·7 | 5·5 | 20·8 | 5·5 | 24·4 | 5·5 | 27·9 | 4·2 | 30·6 | 3·1 |
| 1976–77 | … | … | … | 13·6 | 5·7 | 20·8 | 5·8 | 24·3 | 5·8 | 27·9 | 5·3 | 30·7 | 4·0 |
| 1977–78 | … | … | … | 9·0 | 5·8 | 17·3 | 5·7 | 21·5 | 5·8 | 25·7 | 5·3 | 28·1 | 4·0 |
| 1978–79 | … | … | … | 8·0 | 6·5 | 16·3 | 6·5 | 20·5 | 6·5 | 24·6 | 6·0 | 26·7 | 4·5 |
| 1979–80 (September) | … | 7·5 | 6·5 | 15·0 | 6·5 | 18·7 | 6·5 | 22·5 | 5·9 | 24·4 | 4·4 | ||
| MARRIED COUPLE WITH ONE CHILD UNDER 11 | |||||||||||||
Half average Earnings
| Three-quarters Average Earnings
| Average Earnings
| One and a half times Average Earnings
| Two times Average Earnings
| |||||||||
| Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | ||||
| 1945–46 | … | … | … | — | 3·1 | 3·1 | 2·0 | 9·6 | 1·6 | 18·7 | 1·0 | 25·3 | 0·8 |
| 1950–51 | … | … | … | — | 6·5 | — | 4·4 | 2·7 | 3·3 | 8·4 | 2·2 | 14·6 | 1·6 |
| 1955–56 | … | … | … | — | 5·9 | — | 3·9 | 2·9 | 3·0 | 9·4 | 2·0 | 15·1 | 1·5 |
| 1960–61 | … | … | … | — | 6·8 | 2·1 | 4·6 | 6·1 | 3·4 | 13·3 | 2·3 | 17·5 | 1·7 |
| 1964–65 | … | … | … | — | 6·5 | 2·6 | 5·7 | 7·7 | 5·3 | 15·0 | 3·6 | 18·8 | 2·7 |
| 1965–66 | … | … | … | — | 7·4 | 4·2 | 6·3 | 9·3 | 5·4 | 19·6 | 3·6 | 20·7 | 2·7 |
| 1966–67 | … | … | … | — | 7·2 | 4·9 | 6·3 | 10·1 | 5·5 | 17·5 | 3·7 | 21·1 | 2·8 |
| 1967–68 | … | … | … | — | 7·5 | 5·7 | 6·6 | 11·3 | 5·5 | 18·2 | 3·8 | 21·7 | 2·8 |
| 1968–69 | … | … | … | 0·3 | 8·2 | 7·0 | 7·4 | 12·7 | 5·6 | 19·2 | 3·9 | 22·4 | 2·9 |
| 1969–70 | … | … | … | 0·6 | 8·4 | 8·2 | 7·1 | 14·2 | 5·7 | 20·1 | 4·1 | 23·1 | 3·0 |
| 1970–71 | … | … | … | — | 8·0 | 10·2 | 6·7 | 15·7 | 5·8 | 21·2 | 4·0 | 23·9 | 3·0 |
| 1971–72 | … | … | … | 0·4 | 7·7 | 10·3 | 6·5 | 15·3 | 5·8 | 20·2 | 4·4 | 22·7 | 3·3 |
| 1972–73 | … | … | … | — | 7·3 | 9·0 | 6·4 | 14·3 | 5·9 | 19·6 | 4·8 | 22·2 | 3·6 |
| 1973–74 | … | … | … | 2·4 | 7·0 | 11·65 | 6·3 | 16·2 | 5·9 | 20·8 | 4·8 | 23·1 | 3·6 |
| 1974–75 | … | … | … | 4·8 | 6·5 | 14·2 | 6·1 | 18·9 | 5·9 | 23·6 | 4·7 | 25·9 | 3·5 |
| 1975–76 | … | … | … | 8·4 | 5·5 | 17·2 | 5·5 | 21·7 | 5·5 | 26·1 | 4·2 | 28·9 | 3·1 |
| 1976–77 | … | … | … | 7·7 | 5·7 | 16·8 | 5·8 | 21·3 | 5·8 | 25·9 | 5·3 | 28·8 | 4·0 |
| 1977–78 | … | … | … | 5·5 | 5·6 | 14·8 | 5·6 | 19·6 | 5·7 | 24·3 | 5·2 | 26·9 | 3·9 |
| 1978–79 | … | … | … | 6·5 | 6·1 | 14·7 | 6·2 | 19·2 | 6·3 | 23·7 | 5·9 | 26·0 | 4·4 |
| 1979–80 (September) | … | 6·9 | 6·0 | 14·2 | 6·2 | 18·0 | 6·2 | 21·9 | 5·7 | 23·9 | 4·3 | ||
| MARRIED COUPLE WITH TWO CHILDREN UNDER 11 | |||||||||||||
Half average Earnings
| Three-quarters Average Earnings
| Average Earnings
| One and a half times Average Earnings
| Two times Average Earnings
| |||||||||
| Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | ||||
| 1945–46 | … | … | … | — | 3·1 | — | 2·0 | 4·4 | 1·6 | 13·4 | 1·0 | 21·4 | 0·8 |
| 1950–51 | … | … | … | — | 6·1 | — | 4·2 | 0·5 | 3·2 | 6·2 | 2·2 | 11·6 | 1·6 |
| 1955–56 | … | … | … | — | 5·5 | — | 3·8 | 0·4 | 2·9 | 6·1 | 1·9 | 11·8 | 1·4 |
| 1960–61 | … | … | … | — | 6·5 | 0·1 | 4·4 | 3·2 | 3·3 | 10·2 | 2·2 | 15·1 | 1·7 |
| 1964–65 | … | … | … | — | 6·2 | — | 5·6 | 4·5 | 5·2 | 12·1 | 3·5 | 16·3 | 2·6 |
| 1965–66 | … | … | … | — | 7·1 | 1·1 | 6·1 | 5·9 | 5·3 | 14·1 | 3·6 | 18·5 | 2·7 |
| 1966–67 | … | … | … | — | 7·0 | 1·5 | 6·1 | 6·5 | 5·4 | 14·7 | 3·6 | 19·0 | 2·7 |
| 1967–68 | … | … | … | — | 7·3 | 2·2 | 6·4 | 7·4 | 5·7 | 15·6 | 3·7 | 19·6 | 2·8 |
| 1968–69 | … | … | … | — | 8·0 | 5·2 | 7·0 | 10·8 | 5·6 | 17·7 | 3·8 | 21·2 | 2·8 |
| 1969–70 | … | … | … | — | 7·8 | 6·7 | 6·8 | 12·5 | 5·5 | 18·9 | 3·9 | 22·1 | 2·9 |
| 1970–71 | … | … | … | — | 7·5 | 8·5 | 6·4 | 14·2 | 5·7 | 20·0 | 4·0 | 23·3 | 3·0 |
| 1971–72 | … | … | … | — | 7·2 | 7·6 | 6·2 | 13·1 | 5·6 | 18·7 | 4·3 | 21·5 | 3·2 |
| 1972–73 | … | … | … | — | 6·9 | 6·6 | 6·2 | 12·3 | 5·8 | 18·2 | 4·7 | 21·1 | 3·5 |
| 1973–74 | … | … | … | — | 6·7 | 9·6 | 6·1 | 14·6 | 5·8 | 19·7 | 4·7 | 22·2 | 3·5 |
| 1974–75 | … | … | … | 1·1 | 6·3 | 11·5 | 6·0 | 16·8 | 5·8 | 22·1 | 4·6 | 24·8 | 3·5 |
| 1975–76 | … | … | … | 5·6 | 5·2 | 15·1 | 5·3 | 20·0 | 5·4 | 24·9 | 4·1 | 27·4 | 3·1 |
| 1976–77 | … | … | … | 4·2 | 5·5 | 14·1 | 5·6 | 19·3 | 5·6 | 24·4 | 5·3 | 27·4 | 4·0 |
| 1977–78 | … | … | … | 2·5 | 5·4 | 12·6 | 5·5 | 17·8 | 5·6 | 23·1 | 5·2 | 25·8 | 3·9 |
| 1978–79 | … | … | … | 5·2 | 5·8 | 13·3 | 6·0 | 17·9 | 6·1 | 22·8 | 5·8 | 25·3 | 4·4 |
| 1979–80 (September) | … | 6·4 | 5·6 | 13·5 | 5·9 | 17·3 | 6·0 | 21·3 | 5·6 | 23·4 | 4·2 | ||
| MARRIED COUPLE WITH ONE CHILD 11 AND ONE CHILD 11–16 YEARS | |||||||||||||
Half average Earnings
| Three-quarters Average Earnings
| Average Earnings
| One and a half times Average Earnings
| Two times Average Earnings
| |||||||||
| Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | ||||
| 1945–46 | … | … | … | — | 3·1 | — | 2·0 | 4·4 | 1·6 | 13·4 | 1·0 | 21·4 | 0·8 |
| 1950–51 | … | … | … | — | 6·1 | — | 4·2 | 0·5 | 3·2 | 6·2 | 2·2 | 11·6 | 1·6 |
| 1955–56 | … | … | … | — | 5·5 | — | 3·8 | 0·4 | 2·9 | 6·1 | 1·9 | 11·8 | 1·4 |
| 1960–61 | … | … | … | — | 6·5 | — | 4·4 | 2·5 | 3·3 | 9·4 | 2·2 | 14·5 | 1·7 |
| 1964–65 | … | … | … | — | 6·2 | — | 5·6 | 3·7 | 5·2 | 11·5 | 3·5 | 16·0 | 2·6 |
| 1965–66 | … | … | … | — | 7·1 | 0·4 | 6·1 | 5·2 | 5·3 | 13·4 | 3·6 | 18·0 | 2·7 |
| 1966–67 | … | … | … | — | 7·0 | 0·9 | 6·1 | 5·8 | 5·4 | 14·1 | 3·6 | 18·5 | 2·7 |
| 1967–68 | … | … | … | — | 7·3 | 1·6 | 6·4 | 6·7 | 5·7 | 14·9 | 3·7 | 19·2 | 2·8 |
| 1968–69 | … | … | … | — | 8·0 | 4·4 | 7·0 | 9·9 | 5·6 | 17·2 | 3·8 | 20·8 | 2·8 |
| 1969–70 | … | … | … | — | 7·8 | 5·9 | 6·8 | 11·8 | 5·5 | 18·4 | 3·9 | 21·7 | 2·9 |
| 1970–71 | … | … | … | — | 7·5 | 7·6 | 6·4 | 13·5 | 5·7 | 19·6 | 4·0 | 22·6 | 3·0 |
| 1971–72 | … | … | … | — | 7·2 | 6·8 | 6·2 | 12·5 | 5·6 | 18·2 | 4·3 | 21·2 | 3·2 |
| 1972–73 | … | … | … | — | 6·9 | 5·9 | 6·2 | 11·8 | 5·8 | 17·8 | 4·7 | 20·9 | 3·5 |
| 1973–74 | … | … | … | — | 6·7 | 9·0 | 6·1 | 14·1 | 5·8 | 19·3 | 4·7 | 22·0 | 3·5 |
| 1974–75 | … | … | … | 0·2 | 6·3 | 10·9 | 6·0 | 16·3 | 5·8 | 21·8 | 4·6 | 24·6 | 3·5 |
| 1975–76 | … | … | … | 4·9 | 5·2 | 14·6 | 5·3 | 19·6 | 5·4 | 24·6 | 4·1 | 27·5 | 3·1 |
| 1976–77 | … | … | … | 3·5 | 5·5 | 13·7 | 5·6 | 18·9 | 5·6 | 24·2 | 5·3 | 27·2 | 4·0 |
| 1977–78 | … | … | … | 2·0 | 5·4 | 12·2 | 5·5 | 17·5 | 5·6 | 22·9 | 5·2 | 25·6 | 3·9 |
| 1978–79 | … | … | … | 4·8 | 5·8 | 13·0 | 6·0 | 17·7 | 6·1 | 22·6 | 5·8 | 25·3 | 4·4 |
| 1979–80 (September) | … | 6·4 | 5·6 | 13·5 | 5·9 | 17·3 | 6·0 | 21·3 | 5·6 | 23·4 | 4·2 | ||
| MARRIED COUPLE WITH TWO CHILDREN UNDER 11 AND TWO CHILDREN 11–16 YEARS | |||||||||||||
Half average Earnings
| Three-quarters Average Earnings
| Average Earnings
| One and a half times Average Earnings
| Two times Average Earnings
| |||||||||
| Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | Tax | NIC | ||||
| 1945–46 | … | … | … | — | 3·1 | — | 2·0 | — | 1·6 | 5·8 | 1·0 | 13·4 | 0·8 |
| 1950–51 | … | … | … | — | 5·4 | — | 3·9 | — | 3·0 | 2·0 | 2·1 | 6·3 | 1·6 |
| 1955–56 | … | … | … | — | 4·8 | — | 3·4 | — | 2·7 | 1·1 | 1·8 | 6·0 | 1·4 |
| 1960–61 | … | … | … | — | 5·7 | — | 4·1 | — | 3·1 | 3·8 | 2·1 | 9·5 | 1·6 |
| 1964–65 | … | … | … | — | 5·6 | — | 5·2 | — | 5·0 | 5·5 | 3·4 | 11·4 | 2·6 |
| 1965–66 | … | … | … | — | 6·4 | — | 5·7 | — | 5·1 | 7·4 | 3·5 | 13·4 | 2·6 |
| 1966–67 | … | … | … | — | 6·4 | — | 5·8 | 0·5 | 5·0 | 8·2 | 3·5 | 14·0 | 2·7 |
| 1967–68 | … | … | … | — | 6·6 | — | 6·0 | 1·3 | 5·1 | 9·5 | 3·6 | 14·9 | 2·7 |
| 1968–69 | … | … | … | — | 6·7 | 1·2 | 6·4 | 5·9 | 5·2 | 14·0 | 3·6 | 18·3 | 2·7 |
| 1969–70 | … | … | … | — | 6·8 | 3·0 | 6·1 | 8·3 | 5·1 | 15·7 | 3·8 | 19·6 | 2·8 |
| 1970–71 | … | … | … | — | 6·6 | 4·0 | 5·9 | 12·4 | 5·0 | 17·1 | 3·8 | 20·7 | 2·9 |
| 1971–72 | … | … | … | — | 6·5 | 1·4 | 5·8 | 10·2 | 5·0 | 15·0 | 4·1 | 18·6 | 3·1 |
| 1972–73 | … | … | … | — | 6·3 | 1·2 | 5·8 | 9·9 | 5·4 | 14·9 | 4·5 | 18·6 | 3·4 |
| 1973–74 | … | … | … | — | 6·1 | 4·8 | 5·7 | 12·3 | 5·5 | 16·8 | 4·5 | 20·0 | 3·4 |
| 1974–75 | … | … | … | — | 5·9 | 5·5 | 5·7 | 13·7 | 5·6 | 18·7 | 4·5 | 22·2 | 3·4 |
| 1975–76 | … | … | … | — | 4·8 | 10·3 | 5·0 | 17·6 | 5·1 | 22·0 | 4·0 | 25·3 | 3·0 |
| 1976–77 | … | … | … | — | 5·1 | 8·4 | 5·3 | 16·4 | 5·4 | 21·2 | 5·1 | 24·6 | 3·9 |
| 1977–78 | … | … | … | — | 5·0 | 7·7 | 5·2 | 16·6 | 5·7 | 20·2 | 5·0 | 23·6 | 3·8 |
| 1978–79 | … | … | … | 2·3 | 5·3 | 10·1 | 6·5 | 15·2 | 5·8 | 20·7 | 5·5 | 23·6 | 4·2 |
| 1979–80 (September) | … | 5·6 | 4·9 | 12·3 | 5·3 | 16·1 | 5·6 | 20·3 | 5·3 | 22·5 | 4·1 | ||
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list for each year since 1969–70 including his estimate for 1979–80 the average real weekly net income, expressed in December 1979 prices, of a man on half average earnings, three-quarters average earnings, average earnings, one and a half times average earnings and twice average earnings who
| AVERAGE REAL WEEKLY NET INCOME AT NOVEMBER 1979 PRICES | |||||||
| Single | Married | Married with one child under 11 years | Married with two children under 11 years | Married with two children, one under 11, one 11–16 years | Married with four children, two under 11, two 11–16 years | ||
| 1969–70— | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| ½ Average earnings | … | 33·90 | 36·30 | 38·60 | 41·90 | 41·90 | 48·70 |
| ¾ Average earnings | … | 47·50 | 50·70 | 53·90 | 57·70 | 58·10 | 66·80 |
| Average earnings | … | 61·50 | 64·80 | 67·90 | 72·00 | 72·70 | 81·90 |
| 1½ Average earnings | … | 90·10 | 93·30 | 96·40 | 100·50 | 101·20 | 110·40 |
| 2 X Average earnings | … | 118·80 | 122·10 | 125·20 | 129·30 | 130·00 | 139·20 |
| 1970–71— | |||||||
| ½ Average earnings | … | 35·00 | 38·50 | 41·10 | 44·00 | 44·00 | 50·30 |
| ¾ Average earnings | … | 49·30 | 52·80 | 55·70 | 59·50 | 60·10 | 68·80 |
| Average earnings | … | 63·70 | 67·20 | 70·10 | 73·90 | 74·60 | 83·20 |
| 1½ Average earnings | … | 93·80 | 97·40 | 100·30 | 104·10 | 104·70 | 112·70 |
| 2 X Average earnings | … | 124·20 | 127·70 | 130·60 | 134·40 | 135·10 | 143·70 |
| 1971–72— | |||||||
| ½ Average earnings | … | 35·30 | 38·30 | 41·70 | 44·50 | 44·50 | 50·30 |
| ¾ Average earnings | … | 50·20 | 53·20 | 56·60 | 60·90 | 61·40 | 71·00 |
| Average earnings | … | 65·20 | 68·20 | 71·60 | 75·90 | 76·40 | 86·00 |
| 1½ Average earnings | … | 96·10 | 99·20 | 102·50 | 106·80 | 107·40 | 116·0 |
| 2 X Average earnings | … | 127·80 | 130·90 | 134·20 | 138·50 | 140·10 | 148·60 |
| 1972–73— | |||||||
| ½ Average earnings | … | 39·50 | 42·40 | 44·70 | 47·20 | 47·20 | 52·60 |
| ¾Average earnings | … | 55·30 | 58·10 | 61·30 | 65·30 | 65·80 | 74·70 |
| Average earnings | … | 71·00 | 73·90 | 77·00 | 81·00 | 81·50 | 90·40 |
| 1½ Average earnings | … | 103·50 | 106·40 | 109·50 | 113·50 | 114·00 | 122·90 |
| 2 X Average earnings | … | 137·30 | 140·10 | 143·20 | 147·20 | 147·80 | 156·60 |
| 1973–74— | |||||||
| ½ Average earnings | … | 40·20 | 42·70 | 45·60 | 49·00 | 49·00 | 54·00 |
| ¾ Average earnings | … | 56·50 | 59·10 | 62·00 | 65·50 | 66·00 | 73·90 |
| Average earnings | … | 72·90 | 75·50 | 78·30 | 81·90 | 82·40 | 90·30 |
| 1½ Average earnings | … | 106·90 | 109·50 | 112·30 | 115·90 | 116·40 | 124·30 |
| 2 X Average earnings | … | 142·10 | 144·70 | 147·50 | 151·10 | 151·60 | 159·50 |
| 1974–75— | |||||||
| ½ Average earnings | … | 39·70 | 42·90 | 46·00 | 49·80 | 50·30 | 54·60 |
| ¾Average earnings | … | 55·70 | 58·80 | 62·00 | 65·80 | 66·20 | 74·50 |
| Average earnings | … | 71·70 | 74·90 | 78·00 | 81·80 | 82·30 | 90·50 |
| 1½ Average earnings | … | 105·40 | 108·50 | 111·70 | 115·50 | 115·90 | 124·20 |
| 2 X Average earnings | … | 140·00 | 143·30 | 146·50 | 150·20 | 150·70 | 159·00 |
| 1975–76— | |||||||
| ½ Average earnings | … | 37·80 | 40·90 | 43·60 | 47·40 | 47·80 | 55·40 |
| ¾ Average earnings | … | 52·80 | 56·00 | 58·70 | 62·50 | 62·90 | 70·80 |
| Average earnings | … | 68·00 | 71·10 | 73·80 | 77·50 | 77·90 | 85·80 |
| 1½ Average earnings | … | 100·00 | 103·20 | 105·90 | 109·70 | 110·00 | 118·00 |
| 2 X Average earnings | … | 130·20 | 134·30 | 137·70 | 141·80 | 142·30 | 150·60 |
| 1976–77— | |||||||
| ½ Average earnings | … | 36·60 | 40·10 | 43·00 | 46·90 | 47·20 | 53·40 |
| ¾Average earnings | … | 51·40 | 54·80 | 57·70 | 61·60 | 61·90 | 70·00 |
| Average earnings | … | 66·10 | 69·50 | 72·50 | 76·32 | 76·70 | 84·70 |
| 1½ Average earnings | … | 96·20 | 99·60 | 102·50 | 106·40 | 106·70 | 114·80 |
| 2 X Average earnings | … | 125·40 | 129·80 | 133·50 | 137·90 | 138·30 | 146·90 |
is ( a) single, ( b) married with no children, ( c) married with one child aged under 11 years, ( d) with two children aged under 11 years, ( e) with two children, one aged under 11 and one aged 11–16 years and ( f) with four children, two aged under 11 and two aged 11 to 16th years.
The figures are as follows:
| Single | Married | Married with one child under 11 years | Married with two children under 11 years | Married with two children, one under 11, one 11–16 years | Married with four children, two under 11, two 11–16 years | ||
| 1977–78— | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| ½Average earnings | … | 37·10 | 41·40 | 44·30 | 47·60 | 47·90 | 52·80 |
| ¾ Average earnings | … | 51·80 | 56·00 | 58·90 | 62·30 | 62·60 | 69·50 |
| Average earnings | … | 66·40 | 70·70 | 73·60 | 76·90 | 72·20 | 84·20 |
| 1½ Average earnings | … | 96·40 | 100·60 | 103·50 | 106·90 | 107·20 | 114·10 |
| 2 X Average earnings | … | 127·00 | 132·00 | 135·20 | 138·80 | 139·10 | 146·20 |
| 1978–79 | |||||||
| ½ Average earnings | … | 39·70 | 43·80 | 47·40 | 51·00 | 51·20 | 58·50 |
| ¾ Average earnings | … | 55·20 | 59·30 | 63·10 | 66·90 | 67·10 | 74·90 |
| Average earnings | … | 70·70 | 74·80 | 78·60 | 82·40 | 82·60 | 90·40 |
| 1½ Average earnings | … | 102·40 | 106·60 | 110·30 | 114·10 | 114·40 | 122·20 |
| 2 X Average earnings | … | 136·70 | 140·90 | 144·60 | 148·40 | 148·70 | 156·50 |
| 1979–80 (September)— | |||||||
| ½ Average earnings | … | 39·30 | 43·10 | 47·10 | 51·20 | 51·20 | 59·20 |
| ½ Average earnings | … | 55·20 | 59·00 | 63·00 | 67·10 | 67·10 | 75·10 |
| Average earnings | … | 71·10 | 74·90 | 78·90 | 83·00 | 83·00 | 91·00 |
| 1½ Average earnings | … | 103·80 | 107·60 | 111·70 | 115·70 | 115·70 | 123·80 |
| 2 X Average earnings | … | 138·90 | 142·70 | 146·70 | 150·80 | 150·80 | 158·80 |
Public Expenditure (Employment Prospects)
38.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will initiate a study into the effects of inflation, interest rates and public expenditure on the level of unemployment.
These effects are kept under continuous review by the Treasury and other Departments. They are also of considerable interest to bodies outside the Government.
39.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what percentage of the current level of unemployment is attributable to cuts in public expenditure.
Even if cuts in public expenditure have some temporary effect on output it would not be possible to cal- culate the effect on unemployment with any tolerable degree of accuracy as the relationship between output and employment has become very unstable.
Car Allowances
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the estimated annual yield from the taxation of car allowances paid to employees using their cars for business purposes; and what is the estimated annual cost of collection.
I regret that the information on which to base estimates is not available.
Oil Revenues
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will publish his estimates of Government oil revenues from royalties, petroleum revenue tax and corporation tax for each fiscal year from 1979–80 to 1984–85.
I have nothing to add to my reply to the hon. Member for Norwich, South (Mr. Garrett) on 4 December 1979.—[Vol. 975, c. 187.]
Investment Income Surcharge
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the loss to the Revenue if the investment income surcharge were abolished.
The most recent estimate is about £230 million for a full year at 1979–80 income levels.
Tax Rates
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the loss to the Revenue if the rate of tax at 25 per cent. were charged on incomes of £2,000 after present allowances.
If the width of the lower rate band were increased from £750 to £2,000 the cost at 1979–80 income levels would be about £1,175 million for a full year.
Unemployment Benefit
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the yield to the Revenue if tax of 25 per cent. were charged on unemployment benefit.
About £125 million in a full year at 1979–80 income levels if the maximum rate of tax on the benefit were 25 per cent.
Tobacco
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the extra yield of tobacco duty if the whole of duty was increased by 10 per cent.
The extra revenue, including the additional receipts of VAT, would be about £160 million in a full year.
Petrol
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer why value added tax is added to petrol prices at the pumps when a substantial tax has already been imposed on this fuel at source.
Under the provisions of the Finance Act 1972—asamended—value added tax is chargeable on the total VAT-exclusive price of petrol. This reflects the general rule—both in the United Kingdom and in the rest of the European Community—that the value for VAT purposes includes any other taxes or duty which may be payable—for example, excise duty or import duty. At a time when it is vital to conserve energy, there could be no justification for relieving petrol from the operation of the normal VAT rules.
Credil Cards
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether the Bank of England in its prudential supervision of the banking system obtains details of the amount of loss resulting from the fraudulent use of and bad debts on credit cards incurred by commercial banks.
The Bank of England monitors and receives information on banks' bad debts including those arising from the use of credit cards. This information is confidential between the Bank and the reporting banks as is provided for under section 19 of the Banking Act 1979. Such bad debts, although not separately identified, are reflected in the banks' published accounts.
Stamp Duty
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will soon seek to abolish stamp duty on conveyancing transactions.
I have noted my hon. Friend's suggestion.
Money Supply
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the increase in the money supply (M3) in each year since 1945.
Statistics of money supply M3, as those for M1 dealt with in my answer to my hon. Friend on 17 January, have been officially compiled only from 1963. The sources of the statistics of M3 since 1963 are the same as those for M1 given in that answer.Figures on a more approximate basis for M3 outstanding at end-of-year from 1951 to 1962, compiled from less comprehensive information from banks than is available for 1963 onwards, are given in
Bank of England Statistical Abstract number 1 1970, page 81.
£ Sterling
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if it is his policy to maintain the external value of the £ sterling at a particular level; and, if not, on what criteria the Bank of England intervenes in the foreign exchange market in ways which affect the external value of the £sterling.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer my right hon. and learned Friend gave on 19 July to the hon. Member for Oldham West (Mr. Meacher) and of my hon. Friend the Member for Melton (Mr. Latham).—[Vol. 970, c. 795.]
Allowances And Benefits
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) if he will publish figures tabulating (a) costs in the current financial year of (1) single person's tax allowance married person's tax allowance, wife's earned income allowance and child benefits and (b) the additional net costs if each of these were increased by 20 per cent. from April 1980, after taking into account the savings on national insurance child additions, children's supplementary benefits and other means-tested benefits;(2) what would be the net tax expenditure saving in the current financial year if the present single, married and wife's earned income tax allowances were replaced by a uniform adult tax allowance of (
a) £700, ( b) £900 and ( c) £1,000, which married couples could aggregate against the incomes of either spouse, plus a householder's tax allowance of £500, which could be claimed by all ratepayers.
I shall let my hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.
Inter-Parliamentary Union
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the total British contribution to the Inter-Parliamentary Union in the financial year 1979–80; what proportion is for administrative costs; and if he proposes to review the anticipated expenditure for 1980–81, in the light of Her Majesty's Government's policies on public expenditure.
The British contribution for 1979–80 to the central fund of the Inter-Parliamentary Union, which is financed by contributions from the 88 member countries in accordance with an agreed international formula, is £40,326. Some 79 per cent. of the expenditure is on administrative costs. The expenditure of the British group for 1980–81 has been reviewed in the light of the Government's public expenditure policies.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the expenditure out of public funds for travel and subsistence for Member of both Houses of Parliament and officials, for attendance at meetings for the Inter-Parliamentary Union 1979–80 and if he will make a statement.
The cost out of public funds for travel and subsistence for Members and officials of the British group of the Inter-Parliamentary Union for attendance at meetings of the union in 1979–80 is expected to be £30,300. My right hon. and learned Friend, the Chancellor, has no plans to make a statement.
Prices And Wages
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the annual rise in prices and wages since 1945.
I shall let my hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.
Income Tax
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what increase would be required to the rate of income tax to make up for the abolition of capital gains tax.
[pursuant to his reply, 21 January 1980]: Less than 1p on the basic rate. This assumes that corporation tax on chargeable gains would be retained.
Capital Gains Tax
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many Inland Revenue staff are engaged on the administration of capital gains tax.
[pursuant to his reply, 21 January 1980]: Much of the work in administering the taxes on income, profits and capital gains is carried out for the purpose of more than one tax, and some staff are employed on more than one tax. It is estimated that the total man-years spent on CGT—excluding corporation tax on chargeable gains—over the Department as a whole in 1978–79 was about 1,070.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish a regional breakdown showing where the staff of the Inland Revenue engaged in the administration of capital gains tax are based.
[pursuant to his reply, 21 January 1980]: I regret that this information is not available.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the cost of collecting capital gains tax compared with other taxes collected by the Inland Revenue.
[pursuant to his reply, 21 January 1980]: On the basis explained in paragraph 43 of the report of the Commissioners of Inland Revenue for the year ended 31 March 1978—Cmnd. 7473—the estimated cost of collecting capital gains tax—excluding corporation tax on chargeable gains—in the year 1978–79 was about £8·4 million. This represents about 2·38 per cent. of the net yield of tax in that year. For comparison, the estimated cost/yield ratio for the other main Inland Revenue taxes in 1978–79 was:—
| Per cent | |
| Income tax and corportation tax | 1·98 |
| Petroleum revenue tax | 0·16 |
| Capital transfer tax and estate duties | 3·49 |
| Stamp duty and capital duty | 1·07 |
Oil And Gas
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the contribution from offshore oil and gas activities to the Exchequer in each year since 1970–71 to date; and what is his forecast of the contributions for each year from 1980–81 to1990–91.
[pursuant to his reply, 14 January 1980, c. 643]: Following are the figures up to 1978–79:
| £milion | |
| 1970–71 | 3 |
| 1971–72 | 10 |
| 1972–73 | 15 |
| 1973–74 | 15 |
| 1974–75 | 20 |
| 1975–76 | 25 |
| 1976–77 | 81 |
| 1977–78 | 238 |
| 1978–79 | 521 |
187.]
It is not the practice to publish estimates of tax receipts in the coming year in anticipation of the Financial Statement and Budget Report nor, in view of the uncertainties involved, to give estimates for individual future years.
Expenditure
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether, in view of the Government's declared policy of cutting and saving Government expenditure, he will appoint Mr. Leslie Chapman, to see to what extent he can plan for cuts in Government expenditure by reducing wasteful expenditure on the same basis as he has recently proposed for the London Transport services.
I have been asked to reply.My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister has already appointed Sir Derek Rayner to assist her and other Ministers in promoting efficiency and eliminating waste. All Ministers are committed to this. It is an important part of the continuing work of the Civil Service Department.
Earnings Limit
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will seek to increase the earnings limit ruling as it applies to retired people; and if he will make a statement.
I have been asked to reply.The earnings rule limit applicable to retirement pensioners in the first five years after pension able age—60 for women, 65 for men—was increased from £45 a week to £52 a week in November 1979. It will be increased again in November 1980 in line with the expected movement of earnings over the 12 months from November 1979. The Government are committed to phasing out the rule in the lifetime of this Parliament.
Trade
Spent Nuclear Fuel (Marine Transportation)
41.
asked the Secretary of State for Trade if he will ask the Health and Safety Executive to make an assessment of the report on the hazards of the marine transport of spent nuclear fuel to the United Kingdom prepared for Green-peace by Mr. Peter Taylor.
The containment and transport of spent nuclear fuels by sea is subject to internationally agreed safety standards and to the requirements of the Merchant Shipping (Dangerous Goods) Rules 1978. The interim report to which the right hon. Member refers will, nonetheless, be studied with interest.
Companies Bill
asked the Secretary of State for Trade what provisions of the Companies Bill [Lords] will seek further to prevent a director or directors from bankrupting a company in difficulties and then buying back at a low price the fixed assets of that company through another company in which the director or directors have an interest.
The Companies Bill [Lords] does not contain any provisions which are directly concerned with this question. The sale and disposition of the assets in a liquidation are primarily matters for the liquidator, and the committee of inspection to deal with in the interests of the creditors and shareholders of the company.Whether additional grounds are needed to enable disqualification orders to be made against directors, or whether other obligations should be imposed upon them, are matters which will be considered when the committee, presently reviewing insolvency law, submits its report later this year.
Russian Vessels
asked the Secretary of State for Trade how many Russian (a) trawlers and (b) other ships enter into British territorial waters on average each month.
Soviet trawlers have no fishing rights within the United Kingdom's 200-mile fisheries zone but Soviet fishing support ships enter our territorial waters to buy and sell fish. The number varies according to the season reaching between 20 and 30 at peak periods. During 1979 the monthly average of Soviet merchant ships entering our ports was about 70 making about 120 calls. Most of these ships are engaged on the short sea trades and call at ports in the Thames and Humber regions.
Oil Carriers
asked the Secretary of State for Trade if he is satisfied with the present arrangements for the safe passage of shipping, particularly large crude oil carriers, around Great Britain's shores; and if he will make a statment.
My Department keeps all arrangements for the safe passage of shipping around the United Kingdom's coastline under constant review with the assistance of expert advice from the United Kingdom Safety of Navigation Committee. Large crude oil carriers already report their presence in the English Channel and Dover Strait to the coastguard and their passage through the Dover Strait is kept under surveillance by shore-based radar. My Department also plays a leading role in the inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organisation in order to gain international acceptance and implementation of measures to improve safety standards.
Mv "Hero"
asked the Secretary of State for Trade what action he is to take in regard to the formal investigation into the sinking of the MV "Hero".
The report of the court of formal investigation into the loss of the MV "Hero" contained four recommendations. One of these, concerning the marking of life raft canopies, is already being implemented with the co-operation of life raft manufacturers. The two concerned with boat drills and the carriage of life rafts are the subject of current consultation with the industry. The feasibility of issuing positive instructions on the safe boarding of life rafts is under consideration within my Department.
Pencils
asked the Secretary of State for Trade what progress is being made in the application by the British Pencil Manufacturers Association for restrictions on the importation of pencils from Eastern Europe and the Far East.
The British Pencil Manufacturers Association, with the assistance of this Department's antidumping unit, is currently preparing an anti-dumping complaint against pencils imported from Eastern Europe. As soon as this is ready, it will be submitted to the European Commission for appropriate action.
Herbicide2,4,5-T
asked the Secretary of State for Trade (1) what was the quantity of 2,4,5-T imported into the United Kingdom for each of the years 1975 to 1979;(2) what was the quantity of 2,4,5-T exported, country by country, in each year for the period 1975 to 1979.
This information is not available, as the substance in question is not separately distinguished in the Overseas Trade Statistics.
European Community
asked the Secretary of State for Trade what measures he proposes to improve the United Kingdom's balance of trade with the EEC.
Our balance of trade with the EEC, as with our trading partners generally, depends on our industries being internationally competitive. The Government's policies are directed to creating the conditions appropriate to that requirement.
General Agreement On Tariffs And Trade
asked the Secretary of State for Trade if there has been any change in the competence of the EEC Commission to sign the general agreement on tariffs and trade trade agreements and associated codes in the latest round of the general agreement on tariffs and trade multilateral trade negotiations as compared with the previous round of such negotiations.
Only two of the agreements reached in 1967 at the end of the Kennedy round are comparable with agreements reached in 1979 in the Tokyo round.The position on competence in respect of the tariff concessions was the same each time—the protocols were signed by the EEC in respect of products covered by the EEC Treaty, and by the member States in respect of those covered by the European Coal and Steel Community(ECSC) treaty.In 1967 both the member States and the EEC were parties to the anti-dumping agreement, as the powers of the Commission under the ECSC treaty in relation to dumping had not then been exercised. By 1979 they had been, and only the EEC was a party to the 1979 anti-dumping agreement. The change involves no practical difference in the operation of anti-dumping procedures.
Andrews Hydraulics International Ltd
asked the Secretary of State for Trade if, pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr, Official Report, 13 December 1979, columns 737–8, he will make a statement on the latest position regarding the depositing of accounts and returns of Andrews Hydraulics International Ltd. at Companies House.
An annual return, made up to 10 May 1979, was delivered to the Registrar of Companies on 19 December 1979, and accounts, made up to 31 December 1978, were delivered on 8 January 1980.
Airports (South-East)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade what is the source of the statistics showing that approximately 80 per cent. of people using airports in the South-East are domiciled in that region; how the data was collected; and if he will cause to be published the exact nature of the questions asked.
The statistics are based on surveys of passenger origins and destinations carried out by the Civil Aviation Authority at the principal airports in the United Kingdom. The results of the most recent survey (1978) will be published shortly together with a description of the sampling techniques and the questionnaires used, as has been the practice in the past. However, the data so far available indicate that 78 per cent. of the passengers using the London airports, excluding those simply transferring between international flights, had surface origins or destinations within the South-East economic planning region. These results do not differ significantly from the figures obtained in the last comparable survey in 1972.
New Zealand Lamb (Imports)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade what is the average quantity of lamb imported from New Zealand each month; how these quantities vary from month to month; what his estimates are of the average amount to be imported each month in the future; what the variation from month to month will be; and what price is paid for each ewe carcase from New Zealand.
[pursuant to his reply, 14 January 1980, c. 6I7]: During the period January to November 1979, the monthly average of United Kingdom imports of lamb consigned from New Zealand was 17,315 tonnes. Details for the individual months are shown in the table below. I prefer not to venture an estimate of the future levels of these imports.I understand that the wholesale price for the two grades of New Zealand lamb regularly quoted at Smithfield market averaged 49·9 pence per pound during 1979. These grades include lambs within a weight range of 17·5 to 35·5 lbs. No comparable information is available for ewe carcase prices.
| Tonnes | |
| January 1979 | 14,509 |
| February 1979 | 27,967 |
| March 1979 | 25,964 |
| April 1979 | 21,290 |
| May 1979 | 15,626 |
| June 1979 | 21,140 |
| July 1979 | 12,395 |
| August 1979 | 11,665 |
| September 1979 | 18,068 |
| October 1979 | 10,089 |
| November 1979 | 11,751 |
| Note:The effects of industrial action have led to distortions in the pattern of trade recorded in the first eight months of 1979, and the figures for individual months must be interpreted with particular caution. | |