Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 5: debated on Tuesday 2 June 1981

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Tuesday 2 June 1981

Overseas Development

African Development Bank

asked the Lord Privy Seal whether he will make a further statement regarding the United Kingdom's proposed membership of the African Development Bank.

As I told the House on 13 May—[Vol. 4, c. 279–80]—the United Kingdom intends, subject to the approval of Parliament, to accede to membership of the African Development Bank. This decision was taken on the understanding that the amended agreement establishing the Bank, enabling non-regional countries to join, had entered into force.However, during the recent annual meeting of the bank's board of governors, held in Lomé from 11 to 15 May, the president of the bank told representatives of non-regional countries, including the United Kingdom, that ratification by the required number of regional members necessary to amend the bank's articles so as to allow non-regional countries to join, and to subscribe to its capital stock, had not in fact yet been completed. The president hoped that these would be completed soon so that non-regional accession could proceed.In the light of this, Her Majesty's Government will therefore await confirmation that the amendments have entered into force before asking parliamentary approval for the draft statutory instrument and the draft Order in Council referred to in my previous reply.

Commonwealth Development Corporation

asked the Lord Privy Seal whether the 1980 annual report and accounts of the Commonwealth Development Corporation have been published; and if he will make copies available to hon. Members.

The report and accounts were published on 28 May and copies were laid before the House. I will arrange for copies to be placed in the Library of both Houses.

Development Council

asked the Lord Privy Seal what was the outcome of the European Community Development Council in Luxembourg on 28 April.

The Council adopted a resolution on world hunger, reaffirming its determination that the Community should contribute actively to the resolution of the problem. The Council agreed the Community's food aid programme for 1981 and discussed a draft framework regulation on food aid policy and management. It also agreed to undertake periodic evaluations of Community aid programmes. There were exchanges of views on North-South issues, on the forthcoming Paris conference on the least developed countries, and on Community aid to refugees, in the light of the outcome of the recent United Nations conference on assistance to African refugees.

World Food Council

asked the Lord Privy Seal what international steps the Government supported at the recent ministerial World Food Council to solve the problem of world hunger; and what conclusions the council reached.

In my speech I strongly supported the IMF's decision to introduce compensatory financing for cereals imports, the conclusion of an effective new wheat trade convention, with special provisions for developing countries, an extended food aid convention and a more assured international emergency food reserve with additional contributions from new donors, the more effective use of food aid to support the agricultural sector, and greater help for food and agriculture from the multilateral lending institutions. I am glad to say that all these steps, together with detailed proposals for national action by developing countries, were commended in the final conclusions of the council. I am placing copies of these conclusions, and of what I said, in the Library.

Trade

Company Registrations

asked the Secretary of State for Trade on what grounds and on what evidence he has based his proposals for changing the present criteria on which the Registrar of Companies can refuse to register a company name.

Section 17 of the Companies Act 1948 provides that

"no company shall be registered by a name which, in the opinion of the"
—Secretary of State—
"is undesirable."
With the growth of the register it has become impossible to administer satisfactorily this totally subjective test and to satisfy requests for provisional approval. The Companies (No. 2) Bill, now before the House, contains provisions in clause 22 which would put the matter on a more objective basis, by indicating names which would be unacceptable or acceptable only where appropriate conditions were met.

Company Liquidations

asked the Secretary of State for Trade how may liquidations were declared during the year May 1979 to May 1980; what figures are available for the first quarter of 1981; and if he will break these figures down as between (a) compulsory liquidations and (b) voluntary liquidations, giving separate figures for England, Wales and Scotland.

Numbers of company liquidations are given in the table below. I regret that figures for England and Wales separately are not available.

12 months May 1979 to April 1980

1st quarter 1981

England and Wales

Compulsory liquidations23591017
Creditors' voluntary liquidations26821595
Members' voluntary liquidations*3800†1295

Scotland

Compulsory liquidations8336
Creditors' voluntary liquidations18466
Members' voluntary liquidations*24172

* in members voluntary liquidations, the company is not insolvent;

† approximate figure.

Air Navigation (Safety)

asked the Secretary of State for Trade if he will make a statement on the activities of the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation, of which the United Kingdom is a member.

Copies of the seventeenth annual report of the Eurocontrol Organisation, summarising its activities during 1979, have been placed in the Library of the House.

Attorney-General

Magistrates

asked the Attorney-General, further to his reply to the hon. Member for Jarrow, 12 May 1981, Official Report, column 231, in which years there were more applicants than magistrates required; what method was used to determine the final list; and whether precautions were used to ensure that applicants did not wrongly assume that they had been turned down on the grounds of unsuitability.

In each of the three years 1978, 1979 and 1980 there were more applicants than new magistrates required for the South Tyneside bench, the number of appointments being respectively seven, nine and seven. It is the function of the Lord Chancellor's advisory committee to select for his consideration those candidates thought after interview to be the most suitable to fill the vacancies on the bench having regard to their personl qualities and the need to maintain reasonable balances of age, sex, occupation and geographical spread. It is made clear to candidates when they are interviewed that they will be considered among others and that, as the number of justices is limited, and the selection is influenced by the balances sought to be maintained, many who may be qualified and otherwise suitable cannot be recommended to the Lord Chancellor for appointment. Candidates are told that failure to gain appointment does not necessarily imply personal unsuitability.

Civil Service

Pay Research Unit

asked the Minister for the Civil Service whether the work in compiling the data for the public servants' Pay Research Unit review was fully completed or not.

The Civil Service Pay Research Unit has completed its work for the 1980 review, but following the suspension of the operation of the pay agreements the data it had collected were not delivered to the parties or processed by them under the normal procedures.

Select Committees

asked the Minister for the Civil Service how much time in terms of total man-hours and as a percentage of total man-hours available has been spent by staff in each Department on work for each Select Committee in the last year for which figures are available.

This information is not available. Records do not exist in all Departments of the staff-time each one has spent on work for each of the Select Committees with which it has dealt.

Prime Minister

Engagements

Q5.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 2 June.

Q6.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q7.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q8.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q9.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 2 June.

Q11.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 2 June.

Q12.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q14.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q15.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 2 June.

Q16.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 2 June.

Q17.

asked the Prime Minister what are her official engagements, for 2 June.

Q18.

asked the Prime Minister whether she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q19.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q20.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q21.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 2 June.

Q22.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 2 June.

Q23.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q24.

asked the Prime Minister what are her official engagements for 2 June.

Q25.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q27.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 2 June.

Q28.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 2 June.

Q29.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q30.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 2 June.

Q31.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 2 June.

Q34.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q35.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q36.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 2 June.

Q37.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 2 June.

This morning I had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in the House I shall be having further meetings later today, including one with the Sultan of Brunei.

Trades Union Congress

Q13.

asked the Prime Minister whether she has any plans to meet leaders of the Trades Union Congress.

Civil Service Pay

Q26.

asked the Prime Minister what proportion of the Civil Service receives annual increments; and what the average value of increment is as a percentage of average Civil Service pay.

All but 1½ per cent. of non-industrial civil servants are on incremental scales, and about half are due for an annual increment during this financial year. On average increments are worth about 2·3 per cent. of total basic pay but the net cost this year allowing for savings from wastage and replacement by staff on lower incremental points is expected to be about ½ per cent. of the non-industrial pay bill.

Mexico Summit Meeting

Q32.

asked the Prime Minister whether she expects population matters to be taken as a separate item on the agenda at the forthcoming Mexico summit.

The agenda for the Mexico summit in October will be discussed at a meeting of the Foreign Ministers of all participating countries in early August. It is not possible to forecast the outcome.

Factory Closures

asked the Prime Minister how many hon. Members she has seen on matters relating to factory closures since she last answered oral questions; and how many jobs are expected to be lost in the closures discussed.

Northern Ireland

Unemployed Young Persons

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many young people under 18 years of age are unemployed in Northern Ireland at the most recent date; what plans he has to reduce this figure; and if he will make a statement.

On May 1981, 8,799 young people under 18 years of age were registered as unemployed. This included 6,665 school leavers who had not been previously employed. The total number of unemployed school leavers this year may be expected to follow the usual yearly pattern with substantial increases this month and in the next two months, followed by a gradual decrease thereafter.The Government are expanding the youth opportunities programme in Northern Ireland in 1981–82 to provide 10,000 places for unemployed 16 and 17-year-olds. This is an increase of 3,000 places on the level of provision in 1980–81, and is additional to other special employment measures and support for industrial development.

Terrorism (Fatalities)

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many (a) soldiers, (b)policemen and (c) civil servants have been killed on duty in Northern Ireland in the last 10 years.

[pursuant to his reply, 21 May 1981, c. 179]: Records are not kept in such a way that those soldiers and police officers who were killed whilst on duty can be readily identified: such information could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. However, the total number of soldiers killed during the period 1 May 1971 to 31 May 1981 is 449; two of these were also civil servants. During the same period 145 police officers were killed. In addition to the two civil servants mentioned above, 11 others were killed whilst on duly during the same period. The figures do not include persons employed by statutory agencies of the Government in the Province; nor prison officers—none of whom has been killed whilst actually on duty.

Home Department

Studies And Reports (Costs)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much, in the most recent convenient year, was expended by his Department in commissioning studies and reports by outside organisations or individuals.

Estimated expenditure in 1980–81 totalled £1·6 million, including £1 million on police scientific and technical support services and £0·35 million on law services research.

Assistant Commissioner Of Police Of The Metropolis (Member's Correspondence)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will call for a report on the reasons why the assistant commissioner of police of the Metropolis took until 13 May (Ref. No. TF 167/79/483 (BI)) to send a formal acknowledgement of the letter of the hon. Member for Newham, North-West of 24 April, which contained only the information that the letter's contents had been noted; what action has been or is to be taken on the matters raised; when a full reply will be sent; and whether he will arrange for such letters to be replied to more promptly.

Education And Science

Higher Education (Modern Languages)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science how many students entered universities, polytechnics and other institutions of higher education, respectively, to study modern languages in the latest year for which figures are available.

The following information is in respect of entrants to study modem foreign languages in 1979–80 and the full-time figures cover both home and overseas students.

Full-time and sandwichPart-time (including evening only)
Great Britain
Universities
Undergraduate6,678414
Postgraduate925307
England and Wales
Advanced
Polytechnics1,104361
Further Education
Other institutions393349

Universities (Student-Staff Ratios)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science by what percentage the student to staff ratio has increased since May 1979 in British universities; and to what extent this has reduced the cost per student.

The provisional student to staff ratio in universities in Great Britain for the academic year 1979–80 is unchanged from its 1978–79 level of 9·3. The latest available recurrent unit cost comparison is for the financial years 1978–79 and 1979–80; in each case the figure was £4,175 at November 1980 prices.

Student Grants

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what factors his Department took into account in its decision to increase student grants by 7 per cent.

In coming to his decision to increase student grants for 1981–82 by an average 7 per cent. over the rates for 1980–81 my right hon. and learned Friend took into account the expected rise in living costs for students but he also allowed for an abatement of about 3 per cent. as a contribution to the Government's policy of restraining public expenditure.

Research Councils (Purchasing Policy)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what advice he has given to the research councils about buying British goods.

Public purchasing policy is the responsibility of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Industry. The policy has been set out in a memorandum issued on 4 March 1981 by the National Economic Development Council. Officers of my Department have brought the policy to the notice of officers of the research councils by letter and in discussion.

Natural Environment Research Council

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science why the Natural Environment Research Council has decided to have its new replacement vessel built in a Norwegian shipyard and not in a British one.

No decision has been made by the Natural Environment Research Council on the acquisition of a replacement vessel, nor on where the contract for such a vessel might be placed.

16 To 19-Year-Olds

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science (1) what would be the net cost to the Exchequer of a 10 per cent. increase in participation in full-time education of 16 to 19-year-olds, taking into account savings in youth opportunity programme expenditure;(2) if he will estimate the marginal cost of a 10 per cent. increase in participation in full-time education amongst 16 to 19-year-olds, taking into account the use of capacity released by falling rolls.

No simple calculation is possible, because spare capacity is unevenly distributed throughout the country and not all will be suitable for the needs of those in the age group currently not participating in full-time education.On the assumption that the 50,000 additional students were distributed as at present between schools and further education, and the staffing ratios implied in current public expenditure plans were maintained for the whole of the age group, and that the expansion took place entirely in areas where appropriate spare physical capacity existed, the cost of expansion might be of the order of £65 million in a full year, 1982–83.It is not possible to give any estimate of possible compensating savings under the youth opportunities programme. Whilst an increase in staying on in full-time education would probably have some effect on the level of youth unemployment, the effect on the need for provision under the youth opportunities programme is not at all easily quantifiable, and could vary greatly as between areas of the country and types of opportunities available, with consequent unpredictable financial effects. Moreover, any savings would depend on the extent to which young people could be encouraged, in the absence in most cases of any financial incentives, to take advantage of additional educational provision in preference to a place on the programme.

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what is the total cost to local eduation authorities in England and Wales of educational maintenance allowances for 16 to 19-year-olds participating in full-time education; and what will be the estimated costs for the next three years.

Educational maintenance allowances to school pupils over 16 in England and Wales under section 81 of the Education Act 1944 amounted to £3·7 million in the financial year 1979–80 at outturn prices. Figures of expenditure on discretionary grants to students in further education are not available separately for specific age groups. Estimates of expenditure for the next three years are not available centrally but the Government's expenditure plans allow for relevant provision per pupil-student to be maintained.

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what would be the total gross costs to local education authorities in England and Wales of paying to 16 to 19-year-olds currently participating in full-time education an educational maintenance allowance equivalent to the level of (a) supplementary benefit and (b) youth opportunities programme allowance.

Further Education (Costs)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what is the average and gross cost per student in full-time education beyond the age of 16 years in (a) school, (b) sixth form college and (c) a college of further education.

Separate figures are not available for the different kinds of sixth form provision. Average apportioned figures for all over-16s in maintained secondary schools and further education are as follows:

Gross institutional recurrent cost per full-time equivalent pupil/student over 16 years in England and Wales*—Financial Year 1979–80
At November 1980 prices £
Maintained Secondary Schools1,340
Major Establishments of Further Education (excluding polytechnics) Non-advance work1,760
* Includes all direct and indirect costs of tuition but excludes pupil and student support, debt charges and local authority central administration which would together increase the costs shown be about £200.
8

Mathematics (Teaching)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science when he expects to receive the report of the Cockcroft inquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools.

National Finance

Commercial Bank Of Wales

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received, and what response he has given, concerning the status of the Commercial Bank of Wales.

My right hon. and learned Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer has received many representations expressing concern that the present status of the Commercial Bank of Wales is threatened by the Bank of England's decision to grant it a deposit-taking licence rather than recognition as a bank under the Banking Act 1979. In reply the relevant provisions of the Banking Act have been explained together with the fact that the Bank of England's decision does not prevent the Commercial Bank of Wales from providing banking services or carrying on its existing business. In addition, the replies have explained that the Commercial Bank of Wales has appealed to the Chancellor under section 11 of the Banking Act against the Bank of England's decision, that the Chancellor has appointed the persons to hear this appeal on his behalf and that in these circumstances it would obviously not be right for him to comment on the Bank's decision until he has received the appointed persons' report. However, the representations received will be referred to the appointed persons so that the appointed persons can take them into account, as appropriate, in their report to the Chancellor.

Education Costs (Tax Relief)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will consider tax relief for all parents investing in the full-time education of their children as an alternative to the assisted places scheme.

No. Those who benefit most from the assisted places scheme are the least likely to benefit from tax relief.

Value Added Tax

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many traders registered for value added tax have an annual turnover of £30,000 or less.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will give an estimate of how much revenue would be lost if he were to raise the value added tax registration threshold from his proposed £15,000 to £30,000.

It is estimated that, if (i) the deregistration limit also was raised to £30,000 taxable turnover over a year and (ii) the proportion deregistering of those eligible to do so was similar to the proportions when the limit was raised in the past, the revenue loss would be about £60 million in a full year. Such a large increase in the limits could, however, cause such a change in the nature of the tax as to result in a substantially larger loss of revenue.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will investigate the reason for the delay of the refund of £2,428·37 of value added tax alleged to be due to Mr. Gareth Rose, trading as Reflex Windows at 6A Bird Street, Lichfield, Staffordshire, value added tax registration No. 307336867; and if he will indicate the date by which any refund due will be made.

[pursuant to his reply, 22 May 1981, c. 187]: I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given to my hon. Friend the Member for Enfield, North (Mr. Eggar) on 6 April.—[Vol. 2, c. 186.]

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations have been made to him regarding the payment of interest on outstanding value added tax owed to the farming industry; and whether he will ensure that, where sums of money are owed on value added tax repayments, other tax demands will be offset until the Government manage to repay these moneys.

[pursuant to his reply, 22 May 1981, c. 187]: Representations have been received from the National Farmers Union, the Confederation of British Industry and three hon. Members on behalf of farmers in respect of interest on outstanding repayments of VAT.As regards the last part of the question, I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given to my hon. Friend the Member for Enfield, North (Mr. Eggar) on 6 April 1981.—[Vol. 2, c. 186.1

Gold And Currency Reserves

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the current value of United Kingdom gold and currency reserves.

At the end of May the United Kingdom official reserves stood at $26,487 million.

Husbands And Wives (Taxation)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will provide a table illustrating the distributional effect between husbands and working wives of a change to independent taxation proposed in the Green Paper in taxation of husbands and wives in terms of the numbers gaining or losing under schemes 1 to 4.

One-Armed Bandits

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what he estimates would be the net extra yield of doubling the tax on one-armed bandits in clubs and public houses in the United Kingdom.

[pursuant to his reply, 21 May 1981, c. 128]: It is estimated that doubling the rates of licence duty on gaming machines, including those in clubs and public houses, would yield about £15 million in a full year.

Tax Evasion And Avoidance

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will update the answer given on 12 June 1979, Official Report, c. 181–82, to the hon. Member for Birkenhead on the Inland Revenue anti-avoidance work.

[pursuant to his reply, 21 May 1981, c. 128]: There are at present 311 staff employed in the inquiry branch, boards investigation office and the special offices—this figure includes 20 secretarial support staff at inquiry branch not included in the answer given to the hon. Member on 12 June 1979. The second London special office was opened in September 1979 and the sixth special office opened in Sheffield in June 1980. A seventh is due to be opened in Croydon this month.

Clearing Banks (Charging Policies)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will take powers to intervene with the charging policies of the clearing banks and other financial monopolies.

[pursuant to his reply, 21 May 1981, c. 128]: No. In general, the Government look to competition to protect the interests of the consumer and do not believe in interfering with commercial decisions taken in the competitive marketplace. Powers to investigate monopolies and abuses of market position are already available under the Fair Trading and Competition Acts. I would, however, hope that given the importance of the clearing system in providing means of payment, the clearing banks would give reasonable notice of any changes in their tariffs.

North Sea Oil (Company Taxation)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he is satisfied with the current rate and scale of payment of (a) petroleum revenue tax and (b) corporation tax by the major companies operating in the North Sea.

[pursuant to his reply, 1 June 1981]: Yes, after the Budget proposals for changes to taxes on oil production.

Wales

Marginal Land

asked the Secretary of State for Wales (1) whether, in the survey of agricultural marginal land areas in Wales, all of those counties are being surveyed which presently contain areas designated under the European Economic Community less favoured areas directive;(2) if the Welsh Office Agriculture Department in its survey of agricultural marginal lands has survyed or intends to survey, land classified as grade 4 and 5 on the agricultural land classification map on Anglesey in the county of Gwynedd;(3) when, following the survey of possible additional areas to be included within the European Economic Community less favoured areas directive, a case for these additional areas is likely to be presented to the European Commission.

asked the Secretary of State for Wales whether the Welsh Office Agriculture Department in its survey of agricultural marginal land has surveyed or intends to survey all land classified as grade 4 and 5 on the agricultural land classification map which lies outside the areas designated under the European Economic Community less favoured areas directive in the country of Gwynedd.

The survey has been completed in the "old counties" of mainland Wales all of which contain areas designated under the European Community's less-favoured areas directive. All land classified as grades 4 and 5 on the agricultural land classification map was included in the survey. The position of Anglesey is being considered as a separate but related issue. The Government have not given any undertaking either that the present less-favoured areas will be extended or that if they are, extra public funds will be available. Any case for extending the less-favoured areas in the United Kingdom as a whole could be ready for submission to the European Commission by the end of the year.

LocalityLocal AuthorityNumber of dwellingsFuel
LlanedeymCardiff1,700Oil
PentwynCardiff950Oil
Rose Row, AberdareCynon Valley184Coal
Manchester PlaceCynon Valley225Coal
Riverside Estate, BagilltDelyn105Oil
Flint CentralDelyn248*Oil
236†Oil
DuffrynNewport984Oil
Wildmill, BrigendOgwr479Coal
Eastside, BettwsOgwr90Coal
Lewistown, OgmoreOgwr177Coal
PenrhysRhondda949Coal
PenlanSwansea297Natural Gas
Gibbonsdown, BarryVale of Glamorgan351Natural Gas
Cwmbran New TownDevelopment Corporation137Oil
* Phase I.
† Phase II.
The schemes are all controlled by local housing authorities. Four authorities are known to have undertaken detailed assessments which have led to proposals to replace the heating system with individual units.

Arans (Access)

asked the Secretary of State for Wales, pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member for Stockport, North on 21 May, Official Report, c. 173, what information he has as to when consultations on access to the Arans in Mid-Wales are likely to be completed.

We understand from the Snowdonia national park authority that proposals for public access to the Arans have been put to the Aran Society, and that the authority is awaiting a response.

Welsh Water Authority

asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will list the powers of the district auditor in relation to the Welsh water authority.

The powers of the district auditor when auditing the accounts of the Welsh water authority

Housing Investment Programmes

asked the Secretary of State for Wales how much of their single block housing investment programme allocations for 1980–81 each of the Welsh districts spent; and what was the distribution of Welsh districts of the recent extra allocation for 1981–82 made in addition to the initial allocation of £79·3 million.

Final expenditure by each Welsh district authority on housing in 1980–81 is not yet known. On the question of the supplementary allocations, I refer the hon. Member to my answer of 27 March to my hon. Friend the Member for Anglesey (Mr. Best).

District Heating Schemes

asked the Secretary of State for Wales, further to his answer of 18 May regarding district heating schemes, Official Report, c. 15, where these schemes are in operation; by whom they are run; and what assessment has been made of their effectiveness.

The information is as follows:are described in sections 154 to 167 of the Local Government Act 1972, which are applied to water authorities by virtue of paragraph 39 of schedule 3 to the Water Act 1973.

Energy

Mining Subsidence

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will list those countries in the European Economic Community where coal is mined on a commercial scale, indicating in each case whether or not the owners or operators of the coal mines are liable for all mining subsidence damage, including consequential loss and depreciation in value of property.

Four countries, other than the United Kingdom, produce coal on a commercial scale in the European Economic Community: France, Federal Republic of Germany, Belgium and the Republic of Ireland. The regime governing liability for mining subsidence damage in each of these is as follows:

France: Mine operators are responsible for all material damage resulting from mining operations, but are not normally responsible for non-material damage.

Federal Republic of Germany: Current law varies from region to region, with responsibility for all damage, in the majority of cases, falling on the owner of the land being mined and the mine operator. From 1 January 1982, a new federal law makes mine operators responsible for all damage resulting from mining operations.

Belgium: Mining companies are responsible for all damage caused by mining operations including depreciation if it was shown that this was directly caused by mining activities.

Republic of Ireland: There is no specific legislation relating to mining subsidence.

Nuclear Power Stations

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing (a) the historic cost for the initial fuel charge on each reactor, (b) the year or years in which the payments were made in each case and (c) the date when the initial fuel charge was loaded for each reactor for each of the following nuclear stations: Dungeness B, Hartlepool, Heysham, Hinckley Point B, Dungeness A, Sizewell, Hinckley Point A, Oldbury, Trawsfynydd and Wylfa.

Hydroelectric Power Stations

asked the Secretary of State for Energy, further to his answer of 15 May, Official Report, c. 381, regarding hydroelectric power stations in Wales, what are the five possible locations for (a) hydroelectric plants and (b) pumped storage schemes which are being reviewed; what is their respective potential installed generating capacity and electricity output; and whether the cheap energy produced will be used primarily for the benefit of the local community by promoting industrial development through the use of electricity.

Five potential locations for hydroelectric stations were examined in the early 1950s, in addition to Rheidol. I am informed by the CEGB that the sites were on the Conway Dwyryd, Glaslyn, Mawddach and Nant Ffrancon rivers. Of these, the scheme based on the Dwyryd was subsequently developed as the Ffestiniog pumped storage scheme. On the basis of these earlier estimates the potential installed capacity of the scheme at Nant Ffrancon was assessed to be of the order of 35 MW and that of the other three schemes of the order of 50 MW each.With respect to the Bowydd and Croesor pumped storage projects, generating capacities of over 2,000 MW were tentatively ascribed by the board to each scheme, but no need is seen at present for additional pumped storage capacity. Should any of these projects be developed, they would be fuly integrated into the national grid for the benefit of all consumers.

Oil Production

asked the Secretary of State for Energy whether the Government have decided to introduce oil production cuts.

No decision has been taken to impose production cuts. I shall review the position in the autumn and I shall give the industry proper notice of my intentions.

Energy Conservation

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he has any plans to develop the role of the voluntary organisations in promoting energy conservation.

I am pleased to announce that the Department of Energy proposes to spend £104,500 in 1981–82 to stimulate the activities of voluntary organisations in promoting energy conservation. I believe that the voluntary sector can make an important contribution in this area.This expenditure is in three parts. First, the Department of Energy and the Manpower Services Commission will each contribute £11,500 this year towards the costs of the neighbourhood energy action programme. This has been set up by the National Council for Voluntary Organisations, to develop community energy projects the purpose of which is to make available information and advice on practical self-help in energy saving, and to sponsor home insulation schemes. Secondly, I have allocated £18,000 for seed-corn grants, to encourage the establishment of new home insulation projects, through regional workshops and conferences, and the training of project leaders. Thirdly, up to £75,000 is available for project grants to meet the starting-up costs of particular insulation schemes sponsored by voluntary organisations, mainly using the long-term unemployed under MSC schemes. It is intended that these schemes should principally be of help to the elderly and disabled and others on low incomes.

British Gas (Retailing Activities)

asked the Secretary of State for Energy how many jobs he envisages would be lost in the event of British Gas being divested of its entire retailing activity.

[pursuant to his reply, 1 June 1981]: The Government are currently considering the British Gas Corporation's role in the retail of domestic gas appliances, following the Monopolies and Mergers Commission report on the supply of domestic gas appliances. No decisions have yet been taken. The numbers employed in the corporation's retailing activities are a matter for British Gas, and I will ask the chairman to write to the hon. Member.

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will ensure that the safety and standards of servicing and installation work on gas appliances will be maintained in the event of British Gas having no role in such work if it lost its retailing activity.

[pursuant to his reply, 1 June 1981]: The Gas Safety Regulations 1972 lay down safety standards which must be complied with by all installers of gas appliances.

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will make a statement on the involvement of British Gas in retailing activity; and if he will state what its future role should be.

[pursuant to his reply, 1 June 1981]: The Government are considering the British Gas Corporation's role in the retail of domestic gas appliances in the context of the Monopolies and Mergers Commission report on the supply of domestic gas appliances. No decisions have yet been taken. We have no plans to restrict any of the BGC's other retailing activities.

Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

Tartrazine

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list in the Official Report the foods which contain Tartrazine.

Tartrazine is used in a wide range of manufactured foods, including breakfast cereals, biscuits and flour confectionery, chocolate and sugar confectionery, ice cream and ice lollies, dessert products, table jellies, dried and powdered food mixes, canned soups and vegetables, meat and fish products, pickles and sauces, preserves, snack foods and soft drinks. The colour is used only in some products in each of these categories, not all.

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will require all food manufacturers to indicate on labels when Tartrazine is used in the product.

No. The Government's independent advisory committees have classified this additive among those acceptable for use in food. The committees are however reconsidering the labelling of additives generally.

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what evidence he has for the statement made by one of his officials in a letter of 28 October 1980 that food manufacturers, who are well aware of reports of reactions to Tartrazine, are usually very helpful in advising people who need to avoid it that the ingredient is present in their product.

My Department is constantly in touch with all interests concerned with the food industry as producers, manufacturers, sellers, or consumers and is therefore familiar with trade practice. In connection with the case the right hon. Member refers to, confirmation was obtained from a number of major food manufacturers that they would supply the information on request.

Food Additives

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is his estimate of the costs of labelling the presence of specific additives in food.

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list in the Official Report the names of the additives used in food in the United Kingdom.

Most classes of additives are controlled by regulations made under the Food and Drugs Act 1955, specifying the additives which may be used and, as appropriate, the foods in which they may be used and the conditions of use.

Food (Ingredient Labelling)

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list in the Official Report the main reasons why generic terms, rather than specific additives, are permitted in the ingredient listing of food.

The regulations on food labelling have been made in the light of advice by the Government's independent advisory committees on what is necessary or desirable. The committees are at present reconsidering the labelling of additives.

Food (Colouring)

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if the recommendation of the Food Additives Committee, that no colours be permitted in food specially prepared for infants and young children, has been fully accepted; and if colours are now excluded from all such foods.

The Food Additives and Contaminants Committee has been considering representations by all interested parties on this and the other recommendations made in its interim report on the review of the Colouring Matter in Food Regulations. We expect to issue proposals for new regulations after the completion of the committee's consideration. The majority of baby foods sold in the United Kingdom do not contain added colours, and the committee took the view that their use was not necessary.

Injurious Food And Drugs

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he is satisfied that section 1 of the Food and Drugs Act 1955 is being fully observed.

Enforcement of section 1 of the Food and Drugs Act 1955 is the responsibility of the local food and drugs authorities, but I have no reason to believe that it is not generally being observed.

Employment

Unemployment (London)

17.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the current level of unemployment in London compared with May 1979.

At 14 May 1981 the provisional number of people registered as unemployed in Greater London was 270,590, compared with 134,050 at 10 May 1979.

26.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the latest estimate of the number of people under 25 years unemployed in the Greater London travel-to-work area.

At 9 April, the latest date for which an age analysis is available, the number of people under 25 years of age registered as unemployed in Greater London was 91,652.

Health And Safety Commission

18.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment when he plans to appoint the ninth member of the Health and Safety Commission.

The commission as presently constituted is working well and the Act does not require the appointment of a ninth member. The local authorities already have two seats, and although one can see the arguments for appointing a ninth member with professonal and/or scientific experience, it would be difficult to find one who would adequately represent the great number of fields involved. In any event it is the Government's view that the interests of special groups are better covered by the commission's various advisory committees.

European Community (Computer Training)

19.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what funds the European Community has made available for the promotion of training in computer skills in the United Kingdom.

In 1980, allocations under the European social fund to the United Kingdom which can readily be identified as specifically for training in computer skills amounted to £689,697. In addition, a proportion of the fund's overall allocation goes towards computer skill training which forms part of other, more comprehensive training schemes. However, it is not possible to identify these further sums separately.

Industrial Training Boards

20.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what timetable he has in mind regarding individual training boards, following the enactment of the Employment and Training Bill.

My right hon. Friend expects to receive the report of the Manpower Services Commission on future training arrangements in July. We will take and implement decisions on the future of individual industrial training boards as soon as possible after that, subject to progress on the Employment and Training Bill. The timing of any orders affecting individual boards will vary with the circumstances of the board.

Training Centres

30.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will take steps to ensure that training centres operated by industrial training boards are not closed down as a result of the current slump in manufacturing industry.

It is mainly up to industry itself to ensure that sufficient training centres are maintained to cater for future skill needs. However the 25,000 places for apprentices and other long term trainees being supported under the Manpower Services Commission's training for skills programme help to preserve a considerable number of training facilities. Training centres operated by industrial training boards are also being used by the commission under its youth opportunities programme.

Wage Bargaining

21.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment when next he plans to meet the chairman of the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service to discuss future developments in wage bargaining.

My right hon. Friend meets the chairman of ACAS from time to time to discuss a range of industrial relations issues. He has, however, no present plans to meet Mr. Lowry to discuss this specific matter.

Lost Working Days

22.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what the number of days lost due to industrial disputes was in the second two months of 1981 compared with the same period in 1979.

The provisional estimate of the number of working days lost through industrial stoppages in March and April 1981 is 1·2 million compared with 2·2 million in the corresponding period in 1979.

Young Persons (Training)

23.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will introduce a universal two-year training programme for young people at the age of 16 years who are not in full-time education.

A major objective of the proposals for new training initiatives published on 21 May is to move towards a position where all young people under the age of 18 who do not continue in full-time education have the opportunity of entering training or a period of planned work experience combining work-related training and education.

Closed Shop

24.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he is satisfied with the provisions of the Employment Act 1980 relating to the closed shop.

The closed shop provisions of the Employment Act 1980 and the code of practice on closed shop agreements and arrangements have only been in effect since 15 August and 17 December 1980 respectively. When representative bodies in industry have commented upon the Green Paper on trade union immunities Cmnd. 8128 we will be in a better position to assess the overall impact of these measures.

47.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will take steps to prevent the extension of the closed shop without reference to the opinions of employers concerned through restrictive clauses inserted into invitations to tender.

The Government deplore the practice of compelling non-union employees to become trade union members by restricting invitations to tender to firms employing union labour only. This is one of the areas for possible further legislation discussed in the Green Paper on trade union immunities. Consultations on the Green Paper are due to end on 30 June and I hope that everyone with direct experience of these practices will let me have his views.

Trade Unions (Immunities)

25.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many representations he has received to date concerning the Green Paper "Trades Union Immunities"; and if he will make a statement.

I refer my hon. Friend to the reply I gave to my hon. Friends the Members for Dartford (Mr. Dunn) and for Mid-Sussex (Mr. Renton) earlier today.

Manufacturing Industry (Productivity)

27.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what information he has on the changes in employee productivity in manufacturing industry in the current recession 1980–81 compared with that of 1974–75.

In the first quarter of 1981 output per head in manufacturing industries was nearly 6 per cent. below its average 1979 level. Between the peak and trough of the previous recession in 1973–75 it fell by nearly 5 per cent. Figures for output per man hour are not available, because no comprehensive information on hours worked exists which covers both manual and non-manual employees. However, the average weekly hours worked by an operative in manufacturing industries in the first quarter of 1981 was nearly 6 per cent. below its average 1979 level, a similar fall to that in output per head. The fall in average hours worked by an operative in the previous recession was just over 4 per cent., slightly less than the fall in output per head.

Picketing

28.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what representations he has received on the picketing provisions of the Employment Act 1980.

We have had very few representations on the picketing provisions of the Employment Act. But it is clear that the vast majority of people believe that it was right to restrict lawful picketing to a picket's own place of work.

Working Population

29.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the number of people at work, giving the proportion of the population of working age at work for years at convenient intervals over the past 35 years.

Following is the information readily available:

Employed Labour Force* (June), Great Britain
YearThousandsAs per cent, of population of working age†
195123,05673
195523,75175
1959 (a) old basis23,81175
1959 (b) current basis23,22973
196023,64374
196524,65976
197024,19775
197524,37477
198024,15674
* The employed labour force comprises employees in employment, the self-employed and Her Majesty's Forces. It will include some persons over working age.
† The population of working age consists of men aged 15 to 64 and women aged 15 to 59 for the years to 1970 and of men aged 16 to 64 and women aged 16 to 59 for the later years shown.

Secretary Of State (Visit To Germany)

31.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will make a statement on his recent official visit to the Federal Republic of Germany.

The visit, from 12 to 15 April, provided an opportunity to see West German vocational training facilities; to talk to those in the Federal Ministry of Labour and the Federal Labour Institute who administer the vocational training system; and to discuss matters of mutual interest with Dr. Ehrenberg, the Federal Minister of Labour and Social Affairs.

Redundant Apprentices (Training)

32.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what means are available to apprentices made redundant by their firms to continue their training and obtain the necessary technical qualifications.

The main responsibility for helping redundant apprentices lies with the industry concerned assisted by the appropriate industrial training board. In the majority of cases continued training with another employer leading to the necessary technical qualifications is arranged. Where the industry's efforts are unsuccessful the Manpower Services Commission considers the provision of financial support to preserve the continuity of training. This support can take the form of grants to encourage placement with an employer or stopgap training whilst an employer is sought.

Redundancies (Stockport)

33.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many redundancies have been declared by firms engaged in the engineering industry within the metropolitan borough of Stockport between May 1979 and May 1981.

There are no comprehensive statistics of redundancies. The number of redundancies in the engineering industry*, involving 10 or more employees, so far reported to the Manpower Services Commission as due to occur in the metropolitan borough of Stockport† between May 1979 and April 1981 inclusive is 762‡.

Notes:

* Standard Industrial Classification orders VII, VIII, IX.

† Approximated by Stockport and Marple employment office areas.

‡This total includes provisional figures for March and April 1981.

Disabled Persons

34.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what progress has been made so far in the Manpower Services Commission's programme to persuade employers to employ more registered disabled workers.

The Manpower Services Commission's "Fit for Work" campaign is designed to create awareness amongst employers of the abilities and potential of disabled workers, and thus to encourage the provision of more and better employment opportunities for all disabled people including those not registered as disabled. The campaign therefore encourages employers to retain, train, and promote and develop their disabled employees as well as to recruit disabled workers.It is not possible to establish a direct link between the campaign and the figures for disabled people in jobs because of the many other factors involved. But I nevertheless believe that there will be a continuing need for campaigns like "Fit for Work" to ensure that disabled people obtain equal access to the opportunities available. It is for that reason that my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State and my noble Friend the Minister of State were both pleased to participate recently in a joint initiative launched by the Manpower Services Commission and BBC radio where programmes in one week focused on the need to encourage employers to consider the abilities of disabled people in all aspects of their employment.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he is satisfied that the 3 per cent. disablement quota is being properly met on Merseyside, Ormskirk and in Kirkby; and what further steps he proposes to take so as to ensure that disabled people find employment.

In the areas in question the proportions of employers subject to a quota who employed 3 per cent. or more registered disabled people on 1 June 1980, the latest date for which information is available, were as follows: Merseyside 40·2 per cent., Ormskirk 48·4 per cent., Kirkby 62·8 per cent. The comparable figure for Great Britain was 35·1 per cent.The Manpower Services Commission is currently reviewing the quota scheme. I look forward to receiving the commission's recommendations soon on a future strategy for helping disabled people whether registered or unregistered to get and keep suitable jobs.I am not convinced that enough is being done generally to provide equality of opportunity for disabled people in all aspects of employment. The Government therefore fully endorsed the Manpower Services Commission's "Fit for Work" campaign on behalf of disabled people, which encourages employers to consider abilities first, rather than disabilities.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if, in view of anxieties regarding the future provision of employment for disabled people, he is satisfied that a two-year period will be adequate for the new committees for employment of disabled people to be tried out adequately; and if he will make a statement.

Community Industry

35.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what consideration is being given to increasing the budget of community industry.

The overall size of the community industry scheme and its budget will be reviewed by the Government later this year as part of their general review of special measures for the unemployed.

Restrictive Practices

36.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment to what extent restrictive practices in British industry have diminished during the last two years, and whether he will make a statement.

There are difficulties about defining restrictive labour practices and measuring their incidence and my Department does not attempt to collect statistics on this subject. There is however some evidence that awareness is increasing on both sides of industry of the need to review existing practices in order to improve competitiveness. We have consistently urged managers to improve communications with their work force in order to create a greater understanding of the need for such changes.

Consultative Procedures (Code Of Practice)

37.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what progress has been made towards drafting a code of practice on improved consultative procedures at work.

My right hon. Friend and I have consistently urged management to improve voluntarily its consultative and other arrangements for employee involvement and have drawn its attention to the many valuable guides and codes of good practice which have been issued in the past two years by bodies such as the CBI, the British Institute of Management, the Industrial Participation Association, the Industrial Society and the Institute of Personnel Management.

New Industrial Skills

38.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he is satisfied that there are sufficient opportunities for people to acquire new industrial skills and that these newly acquired skills meet recognised standards.

No. The Government and Manpower Services Commission are anxious both to develop initial skill training arrangements so that more young people have access to training to recognised standards in a broad range of skills, and to open up more opportunities for adults to acquire, increase or update their skills during the course of their working lives. The commission recently published, with Government support, a consultative document—"A new Training initiative"—to encourage debate and action on these vital issues. Meanwhile, though recognising that it is primarily industry's responsibility to train and retrain sufficient people to meet changing skill needs, the Government are giving substantial assistance, notably through the Manpower Services Commission's training opportunities and training for skills programmes and the Department of Industry's microprocessor applications project.

Civil Service Dispute

39.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people of principal rank and above have taken official industrial action in his Department during the current dispute.

A total of 102 people of principal rank and above in my Department, including MSC, HSE and ACAS, were reported on strike on Monday 9 March out of a total of 478 in those grades. No other information is available in the form requested.

Unemployment (Preston)

40.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the current rate of unemployment in the Preston travel-to-work area.

At 14 May the provisional unemployment rate in the Preston travel-to-work area was 10·5 per cent.

Unemployment Statistics

41.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will make a statement on the current unemployment figures.

The causes of high unemployment are deep seated and include, among other things, overmanning and inflationary pay awards in the past. The only sure basis for future prosperity and secure jobs is a reduction in the rate of inflation and the establishment of a climate in which the creation of new productive employment is encouraged. These are the objectives of current Government policies. There are already signs of success and the rate of increase in unemployment is lower than it was. But there is, of course still a long way to go.

48.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what was the total number of unemployed, including school leavers, in the United Kingdom for May 1979 and for the latest available date.

At May 1979 the number of people registered as unemployed, including school leavers, in the United Kingdom was 1,299,282. The corresponding figure, which is provisional, was 2,558,405 at May 1981.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the total number of registered unemployed in the United Kingdom; and what is his latest estimate of the non-registered unemployed.

At 14 May the provisional number of people registered as unemployed in the United Kingdom was 2,558,405. I have nothing to add to the answer about estimates of the non-registered unemployed which my right hon. Friend gave to the hon. Member on 27 January 1981.

Industrial Training

42.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he expects the Manpower Services Commission to complete its review of industrial training boards this month.

43.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he has received the Manpower Services Commission's review of its training procedures.

Following representations made to me by the Manpower Services Commission about difficulties it was facing in meeting the Government's request in June, I have agreed that its report should be sent to me in July.

>Professional And Executive Register

44.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what decision has been made about the future of the Manpower Services Commission's Professional and Executive Register.

A decision on the future of PER will be made following a review by the commission in September 1981 of the restyled service, which became fully operational in October last.

Employment Statistics

45.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many vacant jobs as registered in employment offices were filled during the month of April; and how this compares with the figures for April 1980 and April 1979.

The number of vacancies filled by jobcentres and employment offices in Great Britain during the period 7 March to 3 April 1981 was 142,247. Comparable figures for 1979 and 1980 were 152,396 and 143,510 respectively.

Arbitration Procedures

46.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will meet the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress to discuss improved arbitration procedures in industry.

My right hon. Friend has no plans to do so. I am not aware that either trade unions or employers generally are dissatisfied with existing arrangements for arbitration.

Vehicle Light Bulbs (Imports)

49.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether his Department has undertaken any studies about the effects on employment resulting from increased imports of vehicle light bulbs from Eastern Europe and the Far East.

No, but my right hon. Friend the Minister of Transport is considering adopting United Nations Economic Commission for Europe regulation No. 37, which will prescribe standards for most vehicle bulbs. I understand that British manufacturers of vehicle light bulbs consider this regulation will help them to compete with Far Eastern manufacturers who at present are known to be supplying bulbs of indifferent quality.

Redundancy Payments

50.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what proposals he has for amending the statutory redundancy payments scheme, and if they will remove the anomaly that causes reduced payments to workers whose redundancy is preceded by extended short-time working.

None, since I am not aware that any anomaly exists. I refer the right hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Hemsworth (Mr. Woodall) on 23 February 1981.—[Vol. 999, c. 283.]

Youth Opportunities Programme

asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) if, in calculating the hourly rate per trainee, he will include administration and direct costs incurred by employers organising life and social skills training in work experience on employers' premises schemes in the youth opportunities programme;(2) what is the cost per trainee hour of the life and social skills training within the work experience on employers' premises module of the youth opportunities programme;(3) if he will give the latest available statistics on the percentage of youth opportunities programme graduates getting jobs

(a) immediately and (b) within six months after course completion in the United Kingdom as a whole in each region and in each of the special programme board areas.

Mrs R Griffin

asked the Secretary of State for Employment, following his letter to the hon. Member for Hackney, South and Shoreditch, indicating that Mrs. R. Griffin would have to wait seven weeks for her benefit payment as a result of a lost Girocheque, if he will ensure that full interest will be paid on the sum due when the seven-week period has expired; and if he will make this his practice in every such case.

[pursuant to his reply, 1 June 1981]: Interest is not normally paid when a Girocheque reported as not received is replaced. An immediate replacement may be made, for instance in cases of hardship, but when an immediate replacement is not made it would not be appropriate to pay interest in respect of circumstances often outside the control of my Department.There is, however, a scheme for payment of interest when, exceptionally, arrears of unemployment benefit amounting to at least £50 have not been paid within 12 months.We do not propose to change these arrangements.

Lost Girocheques

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what representations he has made to the Post Office regarding the frequency of lost Girocheques from his Department due for payment to people living in Hackney, South and Shoreditch.

[pursuant to his reply, 1 June 1981]: None. The position is kept under review and representations made in the light of local or national circumstances. There have been individual cases of delay in Hackney, South and Shoreditch, but no recent bulk postal delays.

Defence

Northern Ireland

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the latest estimated cost of the British Army in Northern Ireland.

The estimated extra cost of military operations in Northern Ireland in 1980–81 was £111 million.

Torpedoes

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he has reached a decision on a new torpedo for the Royal Navy submarine fleet.

No. The current assessment of the two competing options for the Royal Navy's new heavyweight torpedo is not due to be completed until later this year.

Environment

Regional Water Authorities

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the powers of the district auditor in relation to the English regional water authorities.

Paragraph 39 of schedule 3 to the Water Act 1973 provides that water authorities shall be audited in accordance with part VIII of the Local Government Act 1972 by a district auditor or an approved auditor. A district and approved auditor's powers in relation to a water authority are the same as they are in relation to a local authority under sections 154 to 167 of the 1972 Act.

Greater London Council (Town Expansion Schemes)

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he has completed discussions with the local authorities involved in the Greater London Council town expansion schemes; and whether he will make a statement.

As I announced on 14 December 1979, the Government concluded that the various schemes whereby local authorities receive population from Greater London should be terminated as quickly as possible. I set out the categories of transitional arrangements proposed, and my Department notified each local authority concerned which category was proposed for it.The majority of local authorities were content with the category proposed. My Department has since discussed the question with each of the others.The termination of these schemes does not, in any way weaken the ability of local authorities to promote the economic growth of their areas since the effects are limited to ending certain special assistance for housing and amenities related to the movement of families from Greater London, and particular arrangements for industrial development certificates which has lost most of its significance as a result of changes in IDC control, particularly those announced by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Industry on 17 July 1979 and 6 August 1980.In the light of the views expressed by the local authorities we have concluded that there is no case for changing the proposed transitional arrangements.Termination of the agreement between the Greater London Council and the local authority is a matter for the two parties. Where the Government are involved, the position in the light of our conclusions will be as follows:

  • (i) Those which have already terminated or where the special arrangements will be brought to an end forthwith:
    • Basingstoke
    • Braintree and Witham
    • Grantham (South Kesteven)
    • Houghton Regis (South Bedfordshire)
    • Plymouth
    • Thetford (Breckland)
  • (ii) Those where there will be a transitional period of up to three years for the special arrangements for industrial development certificates and of five years within which councils can submit new claims for amenity grants:
    • Andover (Test Valley)
    • Ashford (Kent)
    • Aylesbury (Vale of Aylesbury)
    • Banbury (Cherwell)
    • Bodmin (North Cornwall)
    • Bury St Edmunds (St Edmundsbury)
    • Gainsborough (West Lindsey)
    • Haverhill (St Edmundsbury)
    • Huntingdon
    • St Neots (Huntingdon)
    • Kings Lynn (West Norfolk)
    • Melford and Sudbury (Babergh)
    • Mildenhall and Brandon (Forest Heath)
    • Sandy (Mid Bedfordshire)
    • Swindon (Thamesdown)
    • Wellingborough
  • (iii) One scheme which will not be terminated at this stage (because it would be faced with serious difficulties) and has signed a revised agreement with the GLC:
    • Hastings

    Transport

    Midland Link Motorways

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if, pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr, on 12 January 1981, Official Report, column 491, any further cases of dropped steel beams on the elevated sections of the Midland link motorways have been discovered.

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether any further evidence of structural failure has been discovered on the elevated sections of Midland link motorways, and if he will make a statement.

    No. The only significant development since my hon. and learned Friend's reply of Wednesday 4 February, is that referred to in the reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Meriden (Mr. Mills) on 16 April 1981.—[Vol. 3, c. 266.]

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if the inspections of concrete support pillars of the Midland link motorways will result in any repair work of any nature to any of the pillars; and if so, whether he will give details.

    Yes. Full details of the items involved will not be available until all the principal inspection reports are received later his year.

    Industry

    Foundry Industry

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many foundry closures there have been in the past three years; and how many works remain in the United Kingdom.

    Estimated figures for the United Kingdom are as follows:

    Foundries closed 1978 to 1980Foundries remaining in production
    Iron104550
    Steel874
    Non-ferrous7not known

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry what is the level of grants or aid to the foundry industry.

    The foundry industry has received the following amounts under the sectoral aid scheme:

    Ferrous Foundries £ millionNon-ferrous Foundries £ million
    Actual paid46·19·7
    Estimate of residual payments1·851·9
    Regional development grants, assistance under section 7 of the Industry Act and assistance under the product and process development scheme and the microprocessor applications scheme are among the schemes of grant or aid for which foundries may be eligible, but details of how much has been paid in total to the industry under such schemes are not available.

    Forging Companies (Energy Use)

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry what is the total of energy used by forging companies represented by (a) gas and (b) electricity; and what was the cost of energy expressed as a percentage of operating costs.

    Detailed assessments are not available, but it is thought that gas and oil represent around 80 per cent. of the total energy used by forging companies and electricity around 20 per cent. The average cost of energy is 15 to 30 per cent. of operating costs depending upon the type of forging made by the company.

    Castings (Imports)

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry to what extent British industry is dependent upon castings imported from Europe; and if he will compare the position over the past decade.

    Comparable figures are not available for all types of ferrous castings, but in 1980 imports of iron castings into the United Kingdom from Europe represented about 6 per cent. of domestic production. Recorded tonnages increased from around 29,000 tonnes in 1972 to around 110,000 tonnes in 1980. Total direct exports from the United Kingdom, however, increased slightly from 120,000 tonnes in 1972 to 135 tonnes in 1980. Figures for non-ferrous castings are not available without investigation at disproportionate cost.

    British Telecommunications (External Financing Limit)

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he will now make a statement about British Telecommunications' external financing limit.

    As stated in "The Government's expenditure plans 1981–82 to 1983–84", Cmnd. 8175, British Telecom's external financing limit of £180 million and the related figures in the White Paper assumed that BT would make a real return on net assets of 6 per cent. in 1981–82. Following a reappraisal by BT of volume prospects in the light of the recession, the Government recognise that it would not be reasonable to expect BT to make this level of return in the current financial year. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has accordingly agreed with the chairman that BT's financial target in 1981–82 should be set at a real return of 5 per cent. defined as profit before interest but after historic and supplementary depreciation, expressed as a proportion of net assets at replacement cost.Reflecting this reduced financial return, my right hon. Friend has also agreed that BT's external financing limit should be raised by £200 million to £380 million in order to enable BT to maintain its planned investment programme, which, following revised demand forecasts by BT, now stands at a little over £1,900 million in 1981–82. The funds are being found from the contingency reserve within the planned totals of public expenditure.As a condition of the increased external financing limit the chairman has agreed to make the necessary arrangements to ensure that the additional sums are used exclusively for capital expenditure. British Telecom has undertaken to look urgently at ways of closing any remaining financing gap; in particular it is at my request asking two groups of external consultants who are already advising on aspects of BT's operations to include in the scope of their investigations a close look at possible cost savings and efficiency improvements which could be achieved in the present financial year, and, more importantly, in later years as well.

    I am sure that the House will welcome these measures which underline the recognition by the Government and BT of the central importance of telecommunications investment to this country's future economic performance.

    Loan Guarantee Scheme

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he is in a position to give more details of the loan guarantee scheme.

    The Government's new loan guarantee scheme is now open for applications from small businesses. The scheme is designed to enable the participating banks and the ICFC to make loan facilities available to new and existing customers in cases where they would not have been able to do so without the Government's guarantee. I have made it clear that I am very willing to consider applications from other banks not at present included within the scheme who have experience of lending to the small business sector. The scheme provides for new term-loans repayable over two to seven years and will be open to all types of small businesses—from the limited company to the sole trader—in most sectors of the economy including manufacturing, construction and retail distribution; the number of excluded activities is comparatively small. The scheme is described in a new Department of Industry leaflet, which lists the excluded activities, available from bank branches, ICFC area offices and through the DoI small firms service, telephone Freefone 2444.

    British Gas

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many companies he estimates would be adversely affected through a loss of British Gas marketing support for their manufactures in the event of British Gas being divested of its entire retailing activity; what effect he estimates this would have on imports; and if he will make a statement.

    [pursuant to his reply, 1 June 1981]: I have received some representations from manufacturers and others about the possible effects of a cessation of British Gas' entire retailing activities. These views are being taken into account in the Government's consideration of this question, but I cannot anticipate the outcome.

    Social Services

    Households (Unemployed Persons)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is his estimate of the number of children living in households where at least one adult member is unemployed.

    I regret that a reply cannot be given in the form requested. However, information is available about the number of children for whom a dependency increase of unemployment benefit was being paid at the date when a count was made, or who were included in the calculation of the requirements of an unemployed person getting a supplementary allowance—that is, broadly,

    Table 1
    Merseyside (1980)—Appeals Lodged, Withdrawn and Revised
    Subject of AppealTotal Appeals Lodged of each typeWithdrawn of each typeAnd as percentage of Column 2Revised and not heard of each typeAnd as percentage of Column 2
    Appeals against amount/refusal of benefit—unspecified items3,71172919·61,36036·6
    Appeals against specified item
    Single payments for Exceptional Needs3,35035010·448514·5
    Exceptional circumstances additions1101017·32926·4
    "Living together"68811·8913·2
    Trade disputes68811·8913·2
    Allowances for rent831619·32327·7
    Issue of benefit to third party1132219·52118·6
    Condition of registration for work24312·5833·3
    Payment of benefit in kind2----
    Recovery of emergency payments5360·0
    Recovery of emergency payments1282519·54031·3
    Recovery of overpayments1352619·35137·7
    Report under Section 10(1)9111·1111·1
    Total7,8041,20515·42,05026·3
    It would be very misleading to attach undue importance to percentages based on small numbers of cases.
    TABLE 2
    Merseyside—Appeals heard and success rates (all cases)
    Total appeals heardAppeallant successfulAppellant unsuccessful
    Subject of appeal197719781979198019771978197919801977197819791980
    Total appeals5,7056,5964,7874,4198581,2438688624,8475,3533,9193,557
    Appeals against amount/ refusal of benefit—unspecified items2,0802,1531,7421,5441502051591841,9301,9481,5831,360
    Specified items:
    Single payments for exceptional needs3,3203,3702,5242,4796759656506292,6452,4051,8741,850
    Exceptional circumstances additions47809660716231440647346
    "Living together"3547384010114725363433
    Trade disputes466881084911964566910249
    Allowance for rent191641426561313113529
    Issue of benefit to third party3472536421131032615054
    Condition of registration721251213126182410
    Payment in Kind221212222
    Recovery of emergency payments2372111362
    Recovery from NI benefits485265611147526560
    Recovery of overpayments649285574813260847255
    Report under section 10(1)1271117

    those children who were dependent on an unemployed adult. At November 1980 it is estimated that about ¾ million children were in such circumstances.

    Supplementary Benefit

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish in the Official Report appeal statistics for (a) Merseyside and (b) Liverpool, on a similar basis to those contained on pages 168 to 172 of the Supplementary Benefits Commission annual report for 1979.

    I regret that information is not readily available in the form requested. Information about the Liverpool supplementary benefit appeal tribunal could be obtained only at a disproportionate cost. The following tables give information about Merseyside:

    TABLE 3

    Merseyside—Appeals heard and success rates (allowance cases*)

    Total appeals heard

    Appellant successful

    Appellant unsuccessful

    Subject of appeal

    1977

    1978

    1979

    1980

    1977

    1978

    1979

    1980

    1977

    1978

    1979

    1980

    Total appeals5,3116,1794,4844,1637621,1188027954,5495,0613,6823,368
    Appeals against amount/ refusal of benefit—unspecified items1,9472,0191,6511,4631331891451761,8141,8301,5061,287
    Specified items:
    Single payments for exceptional needs3,0873,1262,3522,3536028606055802,4852,2661,7471,773
    Exceptional circumstances additions4170854161420735566534
    "Living together"3545383910104725353432
    Trade disputes466881084911964566910249
    Allowance for rent151640364561111113425
    Issue of benefit to third party3270485721131030594547
    Condition of registration721251213126182410
    Payment in kind22121222
    Recovery of emergency payments2372111362
    Recovery from NI benefits464763601145476359
    Recovery of overpayments50726442179149655541
    Report under section 10(1)1271117

    *Includes 'unemployed' and 'other' allowance cases.

    TABLE 4

    Merseyside—Appeals heard and success rates (pension cases)

    Total appeals heard

    Appellant successful

    Appellant unsuccessful

    Subject of appeal

    1977

    1978

    1979

    1980

    1977

    1978

    1979

    1980

    1977

    1978

    1979

    1980

    Total appeals394417303256961256667298292236189
    Appeals against amount/ refusal of benefit—unspecified items133134918117161481161187773
    Specified items:
    Single payments for exceptional needs23324417212673105454916013912777
    Exceptional circumstances additions6101119123758812
    "Living together"21111
    Trades disputes
    Allowance for rent41622214
    Issue of benefit to third party22572257
    Condition of registration
    Payment of emergency
    Recovery of emergency payments
    Recovery from NI benefits25212521
    Recovery of overpayments14202115314111191714
    Report under section 10(1)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the number of beneficiaries, set out under the headings of recipients and dependants for (a) Merseyside and (b) Liverpool in a similar format to that of table 8.1 of the Supplementary Benefits Commission annual report, 1979, for the years 1979 and 1980.

    Information about dependants is not available, but information on recipients of supplementary benefit from local offices in the two areas in November 1979 and December 1980 is as follows:

    Merseyside*Liverpool
    1979198019791980
    Thousands
    Supplementary Pensions1101093030

    Merseyside*Liverpool

    1979

    1980

    1979

    1980

    Thousands

    Unemployed70912833
    Sick161655
    NI widows under 602211
    One parent families242578
    Others2211

    * Includes Liverpool.

    Source: 100 per cent. count.

    Note:- These are the figures for DHSS offices in the local authority areas. It should be noted that DHSS office boundaries are not always conterminous with those of the local authorities.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish in the Official Report for (a) Merseyside and (b) Liverpool for 1979 and 1980 an analysis of the results of appeals to supplementary benefit appeals tribunals under the following heads (i) total number of appeals, (ii) appeals withdrawn or not admitted, (iii) appeals revised and not heard by tribunals, (iv) cases heard by tribunals, (v) decisions revised by tribunals and (vi) decisions confirmed by tribunals.

    The following table gives the information requested for Merseyside. Similar information for the Liverpool supplementary benefit appeal tribunal could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

    Appeals by Type of Clearance (Merseyside region and Liverpool SBAT)
    Type of ClearanceMerseysideLiverpool
    1979198019791980
    (i)
    Total number of appeals8,6847,804
    (ii)
    Appeals withdrawn or not admitted1,4491,335
    (iii)
    Appeals revised and not heard by tribunals2,4482,050
    (iv)
    Cases heard by tribunals4,7874,4193,0052,635
    (v)
    Decision revised by tribunals868862
    (vi)
    Decision confirmed by tribunals3,9193,557
    Thousands
    19791980
    FebruaryMayAugustNovemberFebruaryMayAugustNovember
    Merseyside*73689070727210491
    Liverpool2827322828273533
    * includes Liverpool.

    Source: 100 per cent. count.

    Note:

    These are the figures for DHSS offices in the relevant local authority areas. It should be noted that DHSS office boundaries are not always conterminous with those of the local authorities. Information on the number of registered unemployed for comparable areas is not available, and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish in respect of supplementary benefit appeal tribunals for (a) Merseyside and (b) Liverpool, for 1979 and 1980, an analysis of attendance and representations at hearings, an analysis of appeals against decisions on exceptional needs payments and an analysis of appeals against decisions on living together as

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he will publish in the Official Report for (a) Merseyside and (b) Liverpool the deductions made for fuel direct and voluntary savings for 1979 and 1980 in a similar format to the national figures contained in table 10.2 of the annual report of the Supplementary Benefits Commission, 1979;(2) if he will publish in the

    Official Report the number, cost, and average amount of exceptional needs payments in (a) Merseyside and (b) Liverpool in each year from 1968;

    (3) if he will publish in the Official Report for (a) Merseyside and (b) Liverpool a table showing the number of reckonable expenses taken into account in cases in which exceptional circumstances additions were in payment on the same basis as table 16·1 of the; annual report of the Supplementary Benefits Commission for 1979.

    This information is not available and could not be obtained without disproportionate expense.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what was the number of unemployed people in receipt of supplementary benefit in thousands and as a percentage of all registered unemployed in (a) Merseyside and (b) Liverpool in February, May, August and November 1979, and in the same months of 1980.

    Information on the number of unemployed people in receipt of supplementary benefit from local offices in Merseyside and Liverpool is as follows:husband and wife, on a comparable basis to the tables published on pages 124 and 125 of the Supplementary Benefits Commission annual report, 1979.

    The following table gives the information that is available. An analysis of attendance and representation for Merseyside, and the information requested for the Liverpool supplementary benefits appeal tribunal, could be obtained only at a disproportionate cost.

    Merseyside—Appeals Against Decisions on Exceptional Needs Payments

    1979

    1980

    No. of Appeals Lodged

    No. of Appeals Heard

    Percentage Heard in which Decision Confirmed

    No. of Appeals Lodged

    No. of Appeals Heard

    Percentage Heard in which Decision Confirmed

    Pensions

    *

    17273

    *

    12661
    Allowances

    *

    2,35274

    *

    2,35375
    Total3,5502,524743,3502,47974

    * Not possible to give individual regions.

    † Notpossibletoseparate"unemployed"and"other"allowancecases.

    Mersey side—Appeals Against "Living Together"

    Year

    Appeals

    Withdrawn or not Admitted*

    Revised and not heard by Tribunal*

    Cases Heard by Tribunal

    Decisions Revised by Tribunals†

    Decisions Confirmed by Tribunals†

    19797312(16)23(32)384(11)34(89)
    1980666(9)20(30)407(17)33(83)

    * Figures in brackets shown as percentage of Column 1.

    † Figures in brackets shown as percentage of Column 4.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish for (a) Merseyside and (b) Liverpool the percentage clearance of supplementary benefit appeals achieved in three, four, five and six or

    Percentage of Appeals Cleared within the Periods Stated—Merseyside Region and Liverpool Supplementary Benefits Appeal Tribunal
    No. of weeks from lodging appeal to 1st tribunal hearingMerseysideLiverpool
    *19771978197919801977197819791980
    323·724·052·241·328·729·660·250·2
    450·346·373·960·460·152·877·666·7
    568·962·885·080·277·366·486·186·7
    6 or more100·0100·0100·0100·0100·0100·0100·0100·0
    * Calendar Years.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the number of unemployed claimants and the distribution of duration on supplementary benefit for (a) Merseyside and (b) Liverpool in 1979 and 1980, on a similar basis to the national figures contained in table 5.3 of the Supplementary Benefits Commission annual report, 1979.

    This information is not available, and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services in how many cases housing costs were paid direct to the landlord by the Supplementary Benefits Commission in (a) Merseyside and (b) Liverpool in 1979 and 1980.

    I am afraid that the information requested is not readily available and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

    more complete calendar weeks from the date the appeal was lodged for the years ended 31 March 1978, 31 March 1979, 31 March 1980 and 31 March 1981.

    I regret that information is not available in the form requested, but the following table gives the information for the immediately preceding calendar years.

    Incomes In Cornwall

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what is his estimate, at the latest available date, of the number of families and individuals in Cornwall with an income (a) below their equivalent supplementary benefit level, (b) less than 10 per cent. above their equivalent supplementary benefit level and (c) less than 40 per cent. above their equivalent supplementary benefit level;(2) what is his estimate at the latest available date of the number of individuals and families in Cornwall in which the head of household is in full-time work but whose income is

    (a) below his equivalent supplementary benefit level, (b) less than 10 per cent. above his equivalent supplementary benefit level and (c) less than 40 per cent. above his equivalent supplementary benefit level.

    I regret that the information requested is not available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

    War Disabled Persons (Benefits)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will estimate the number of limbless and severely disabled of the 1914–18 war; if he will give an estimate of the total supplementary benefits paid to such survivors; if he will give an estimate of the net cost of upgrading benefits to these survivors to the levels paid to 1939–45 survivors or to the highest levels currently paid; if he is satisfied that rates paid to 1914–18 survivors adequately reflect their needs; if he will take steps to update the benefit to such 1914–18 survivors; and if he will make a statement.

    The number of severely disabled war pensioners, defined as those assessed at 40 per cent. or more, who served in the 1914 war is 7,150, including 1,680 limbless war pensioners. They are all in receipt of age allowance, and an estimated 5,000 other supplementary allowances are in payment to them under the war pensions scheme.The rates of war pension payable in respecF CD17t of service in the 1914 war do not differ from those payable for the 1939–45 war. These rates are reviewed annually so as to ensure that the living standards of war pensioners are maintained.

    Safety Of Medicines

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he will list in the Official Report the names of the products which the Committee on Safety of Medicines recommended should not be used for the treatment of allergic conditions;(2) if he will seek to ensure that details of any inactive ingredients in drugs, which are known to harm some patients, should be declared on package labels.

    I regret that it would be disproportionately costly to prepare the list requested by the right hon. Gentleman. In advising the licensing authority on product licence applications, the Committee on Safety of Medicines take into account the effects on allergic conditions of both the active and inactive ingredients. Where there is reason to believe that one of the ingredients might affect an allergic condition it advises either that the drug should not be given to patients suffering from that condition or that a warning be included in product literature and labelling. Before agreeing to any extension of this practice, I would need to be satisfied that any additional labelling of medicinal products was essential and practicable.

    Food Additives

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what is his estimate of the percentage of the population which suffer (a) mild and (b) serious side effects from tartrazine dyes in food and drugs;

    (2) what evidence he has for his statement in a. letter of 2 January that other food additives, in addition to tartrazine, may be just as capable of provoking adverse reactions;

    (3) if he will name those food additives which are known to be capable of provoking adverse reactions;

    (4) what further investigations have been made into the possibility of reactions to tartrazine since the interim report in 1979 by the Food Additives and Contaminants Committee; when the definitive report will be published; and if he will make a statement.

    The mechanism for the production of adverse reactions to tartrazine is not yet fully understood. No suitable diagnostic tests are available to detect sensitivity to it. Hence no information exists to show what percentage of the United Kingdm population may suffer side effects to tartrazine dyes in food and drugs. Studies carried out in other countries on selected groups of patients suggests that 0·03 per cent. to 0·15 per cent. of the general population may be sensitive to tartrazine. This should be compared with the estimated 1 per cent. to 3 per cent. of the general population who suffer allergies to foods such as milk and eggs. Most of the documented reactions to tartrazine have been mild. Serious side effects are rare.The United Kingdom is represented on the working party set up by the European Community Commission to consider the problem of adverse reactions to food additives. Its report will, later this year, be reviewed by the relevant United Kingdom advisory committees. Their advice will be considered by my right hon. Friend, the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and myself. I cannot go into details about the food additives which can cause adverse reactions until the advice of the committees is available. However, published reports on relevant studies include:Freedman, B. J.—1977: Clin Allergy Vol. 7 407–415Mikkelsen, H. et al—1978: Arch. Toxicol Supp. I 141–143.Juhlin, L. 1981: Brit. J. Dermatol Vol. 104.

    Nurses (Pay)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what has been the annual net increase in remuneration for each category of nurse in the National Health Service in each of the last three years; and what was the actual pay in each case.

    Information is not available in the precise form requested. The following table shows the basic salary maxima of the main nurses and midwives Whitley pay grades effective from 1 April in each of the years 1978, 1979 and 1980 and the increase over the 1 April figure in the previous year. The figures for 1978 and 1979 relate to a 40-hour week. The 1980 figure relates to a 37½-hour week: additional payments were made in that year at plain time rates for hours worked in excess of 37½. Various additional payments, including premium rates for conditioned hours worked at night or at weekends or on bank holidays and a wide range of allowances, were also increased in the period in question.

    1 April 1978

    1 April 1979

    1 April 1980

    Whitley Pay Grade

    Basic Salary Maximum £

    Increase over 1 April 1977 £

    Basic Salary Maximum £

    Increase over 1 April 1978 £

    Basic Salary Maximum £*

    Increase over 1 April 1979 £

    Regional Nursing Officers:
    R110,9961,51216,8155,81920,6833,868
    R210,7291,47616,4055,67620,1783,773
    Area Nursing Officer:
    AT110,3961,43415,9485,55219,6163,668
    AT210,1381,39815,6315,49319,2263,595
    A110,0601,35215,1505,09018,6353,485
    A29,5681,01414,2754,70717,5583,283
    A39,07394813,7504,67716,9133,163
    SDAT10,1381,39815,6315,49319,2263,595
    SDA19,8441,13614,6704,82618,0443,374
    SDA29,37098713,9614,59117,1723,211
    SDA38,93593013,5294,59416,6413,112
    District Nursing Officer:
    DT10,0601,35214,6704,61018,0443,374
    D19,37098713,7504,38016,9133,163
    D28,93593013,0864,15116,0963,010
    D38,46487012,0653,60114,8402,775
    D47,7117719,9282,21712,2112,283
    Regional Nurse:
    R/N18,5608829,31375314,4785,165
    R/N28,4048619,14474014,1254,981
    Area Nurse:
    A/NT8,2038348,92572213,3394,414
    A/Nl8,2038348,92572212,6773,752
    A/N27,9308018,62869812,2613,633
    Divisional Nursing Officer:
    I7,3397237,98564611,9383,953
    II6,8656607,46960411,1643,695
    III6,3825976,94456210,3823,438
    IV6,0285526,5585309,8063,248
    Senior Nursing Officer:
    I5,4074715,8834767,9832,100
    II5,2064445,6644587,6872,023
    Nursing Officer:
    I4,9784145,4164387,3501,934
    II4,8254115,2504257,1241,874
    Nursing Sister/Charge Nurse:
    I4,8254115,2504257,1241,874
    II4,4293724,8193906,8071,988
    Deputy Nursing Sister/Charge
    Nurse3,8263174,1633375,8811,718
    Staff Nurse3,3852793,6832985,1191,436
    Senior State Enrolled Nurse3,3852793,6832985,1191,436
    State Enrolled Nurse3,0162313,2812654,5611,280
    Nursing Auxiliary/Assistant2,5841952,8112273,790979
    Student Nurse2,3561742,5632073,390827
    Pupil Nurse2,2481652,4461983,234788
    Director of Nurse Education:
    I7,7867808,47168512,6654,194
    II7,4117328,06365212,0543,991
    III7,0546847,67562111,4733,798
    IV6,5236157,09757410,6093,512
    Assistant Director of Nurse
    Education6,4576067,02556810,5033,478
    Senior Tutor5,5334866,0204878,1702,150
    Tutor5,1584385,6124547,6162,004
    Clinical Teacher4,8254115,2504257,1241,874

    Note:

    * The 1980 figure includes staged increases from the Standing Commission award and the normal April 1980 settlement.

    Hot Water Cylinders (Insulation)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he has any plans to help people on supplementary benefit with the cost of insulating their hot water cylinders.

    My right hon. Friend proposes to make grants available for the cost of hot water cylinder jackets

    from next November to certain people receiving supplementary benefit. The elderly, the disabled, the chronically sick, families with children under 16, pregnant women and the long-term unemployed will be eligible for these grants. We shall make the necessary amendment to the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Regulations shortly.