Written Answers Toquestions
Thursday 30 July 1981
Church Commissioners
Income
asked the hon. Member for Wokingham (Sir W. van Straubenzee), as representing the Church Commissioners, if he will list the income of the Church Commissioners for each financial year from 1960; and if he will also represent these data in real terms and as an index with 1960=100.
The commissioners' income for the: period 1960 to 1980, excluding trust income and money contributed by dioceses and parishes which passed through the commissioners' accounts was as follows:
| Year | £ million | Index of Church Commissioner's income adjusted by RPI |
| 1960 | 13·4 | 100 |
| 1961 | 14·8 | 108 |
| 1962 | 15·3 | 107 |
| 1963 | 16·1 | 110 |
| 1964 | 16·8 | 113 |
| 1965 | 18·9 | 121 |
| 1966 | 19·9 | 123 |
| 1967 | 20·4 | 122 |
| 1968 | 20·6 | 119 |
| 1969 | 21·7 | 118 |
| 1970 | 22·9 | 118 |
| 1971 | 23·7 | 112 |
| 1972 | 25·4 | 112 |
| 1973 | 26·8 | 109 |
| 1974 | 28·4 | 102 |
| 1975 | 30·1 | 89 |
| 1976 | 33·4 | 82 |
| 1977 | 36·9 | 77 |
| 1978 | 40·0 | 77 |
| 1979 | 46·2 | 81 |
| 1979 | *41·7 | 64 |
| 1980 | 59·3 | 79 |
| *9 Months. | ||
Trade
Japanese Car Exports
asked the Secretary of State for Trade, whether he has received any representations on the level of Japanese exports of cars and vans to the United Kingdom since the meeting between the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders and the Japanese Automotive Manufacturers Association; and if he will make a statement.
I have discussed this matter with representatives of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders who were reasonably satisfied with the outcome of their talks with the Japanese Automobile Manufacturers Association. The levels of these imports from Japan are expected to fall significantly; my Department will continue to monitor progress closely.
Cost Escalation Cover Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Trade if he plans to place the cost escalation cover scheme on a permanent basis.
Representations to this effect have been made by industry and will be fully considered in the review now taking place of the scheme's future when the power to operate it expires next March. The conclusions of this review will be announced in due course.
Exports
asked the Secretary of State for Trade what proportion of United Kingdom exports of manufacturers are being sold at or below the cost of production and sale.
I regret that this information is not available.
Exports (Appreciation Of Sterling)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade what proportion of United Kingdom imports of manufactures have not been reduced in price fully in line with the appreciation of the £ sterling since 1978.
I regret that this information is not available.
European Community Manufacturers
asked the Secretary of State for Trade what was the average rate of increase in the volume of imports and exports of manufactures, respectively, from and to the European Community Six in the periods 1959 to 1972 and 1972 to 1979.
I regret that this information is not available.
Companies Registry, Cardiff
asked the Secretary of State for Trade (1) why a system of rationing permits for searches at the Companies Registry, Cardiff has been instituted; and on what criteria allocations for searches have been made as between company registration agents;(2) why
(a) the Solicitors Law Stationery Ltd. And Oyez Services, (b) Dawglen Managements Ltd. and its associated companies (c) Waterlows Ltd. have been omitted from the list of companies allocated quotas for searches at the Companies Registry, Cardiff.
(3) if he will list the companies which have been granted quotas for searches at the Companies Registry, Cardiff with the reason for their inclusion in each case.
I shall reply to my hon. Friend as soon as possible.
Ships (Standards)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade in what way failures to maintain standards on (a) small ships and (b) foreign ships are discovered other than by general discretionary surveys.
In addition to random general inspections by Department of Trade surveyors, defects and deficiencies are sometimes brought to the attention of the Department through complaints by individual members of crew, and their national or international representative organisations, or through reports from other Administrations and port authorities. In addition, the investigation of a marine casualty may also bring to light a failure to maintain standards.
Grimsby Marine Survey Office
asked the Secretary of State for Trade what response he has made to the urgent request made on 21 July for a meeting between unions and the official side on the proposed closure of the Grimsby marine survey office.
I have not myself been approached by the trade union side. My officials will be responding to the request for a meeting addressed to them.
Detained Ships (Boston And Grimsby)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade how many vessels have been detained with serious defects in (a) Boston and (b) Grimsby in the last 10 years.
From 1975 to date four ships have been detained at Grimsby, and one at Boston. Figures for earlier years are not readily available and could only be extracted with disproportionate effort.
European Community (Newly Industrialising Countries)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade if he will list the figures for imports into the European Economic Community from newly industrialising countries over the past 10 years.
[pursuant to his reply, 28 July 1981]: The information is as follows:
| Imports into the European Community* from the Newly Industrialising Countries† | |
| $ billion | |
| 1971 | 11·5 |
| 1972 | 14·5 |
| 1973 | 21·9 |
| 1974 | 30·7 |
| 1975 | 30·9 |
| 1976 | 37·3 |
| 1977 | 42·2 |
| 1978 | 48·2 |
| 1979 | 58·0 |
| 1980 | 65·4‡ |
| Notes: | |
| * Including Greece. | |
| † As defined in government Economic Service Working Paper No. 18 but excluding Greece (now a member of the European Community) and Malta for which information is not readily available. | |
‡ OECD estimate
Source:
OECD Trade Series 'A'
Overseas Development
Jordan
asked the Lord Privy Seal what further aid is being offered to Jordan by Her Majesty's Government.
A new loan of £8 million has been offered to the Government of Jordan, to be used during the period of its next five-year-plan.
Prime Minister
Engagements
Q4.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 July.
Q5.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 July.
Q6.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 July.
Q7.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 July.
Q8.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 30 July.
Q10.
asked the Prime Minister what are her official engagements for 30 July.
Q12.
asked the Prime Minister whether she will list her official engagements for 30 July.
Q14.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 30 July.
Q15.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 July.
Q16.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 July.
Q17.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 July.
Q18.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 July.
Q19.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 30 July.
Q20.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 July.
Q21.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 July.
This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in this House I shall be having meetings later today with the Prime Ministers of Australia and Guyana. This evening I am giving a dinner for a number of visiting Heads of State and Government.
Economic Policy
Q9.
asked the Prime Minister if she will undertake a major review of the economic policies of her Administration.
I have nothing to add to the speeches made on behalf of the Government in the debate last Monday.
Government Priorities
Q11.
asked the Prime Minister if she will make a statement outlining the main priorities for action by her Majesty's Government, other than economic policies, for the remainder of the present Parliament.
Forthcoming legislative proposals will be set out in the Gracious Speech at the beginning of the next parliamentary Session.
Cbi
Q13.
asked the Prime Minister when last she met the leaders of the Confederation of British Industry.
I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply I gave him on 23 July.
Gold Reserves
asked the Prime Minister what total amount of gold reserves in the name of the United Kingdom Government is held in the United States of America.
It is not Government practice to disclose information on the distribution of the gold reserves.
Liverpool (Ministerial Visit)
asked the Prime Minister if she will estimate the total costs involved in the visit to Liverpool made by the Secretary of State for the Environment, the Minister of State, Home Office, and the officials concerned.
The investigation by the Secretary of State for the Environment, the Minister of State, Home Office, and their small official supporting team is not complete. I cannot yet give a firm estimate of the expenses which will be incurred during their extended visit to the area, but they are making use of the existing facilities of the regional offices and the Merseyside urban development corporation.
Wales
Psychogeriatrics
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will take steps to appoint psychogeriatrics as an independent specialty in order to meet the increasing numbers of the elderly needing specialist geriatric treatment.
I do not propose to take steps to designate psychogeriatrics as an independent specialty. Health authorities already have the power to appoint to approved posts consultant psychiatrists with a special interest in psychogeriatrics.
Employment (Elderly Persons)
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is his estimate of (a) the total number of men over 60 years of age and (b) the total number of women over 60 years of age, who are currently in employment in Wales; how many of these are employees and how many self employed.
The latest available information on employees by age is based on the Welsh Housing and Dwelling Survey and relates to April 1979. The estimated number of men aged 60 and over in employment at that time was 51,600, the total being made up of 39,700 employees and 11,800 self-employed. The corresponding figures for women were 19,500, 16,200 and 3,300.
Construction Industry
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is his estimate of the total number of persons currently unemployed in Wales who were previously employed in the construction industry.
26,265 on 14 May 1981.
Welsh Development Agency
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will publish a table showing for the years 1978–79, 1979–80 and 1980–81 the weighted average rate of return on capital employed by the Welsh Development Agency in manufacturing industry, in line with the guidelines issued by his Department announced in the Official Report, 3 August, 1978, Vol. 955, columns 661–63; whether he still expects the agency to achieve this target rate of return by the end of the financial year 1981–82 as originally stipulated; and, if not, what plans there are to vary the target rate of return.
The Welsh Development Agency has, in accordance with its existing financial duties published the weighted average rate of return for all companies in which the agency has held or holds investments in its annual reports for 1978–79, 1979–80 and 1980–81.As I told the hon. Member on 22 July the financial duties to be effective from 1 April 1981 are currently under review.—[Vol. 9, c. 148.]
Welsh Language
asked the Secretary of State for Wales when he expects to publish a statement on his policy towards the place of Welsh in schools.
I have today published a statement entitled "Welsh in Schools". Copies have been placed in the Library of the House. The document takes account of comments made on the consultative paper "Welsh in the School Curriculum" published last year. It provides guidance to local education authorities and schools in Wales and is complementary to the guidance contained in "The School Curriculum" which my right hon. and learned Friend the Secretary of State for Education and Science and I published earlier this year.
Attorney-General
Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948
asked the Attorney-General if he will introduce legislation to repeal section 2(4) of the Law Reform (Personal Injuries) Act 1948, as recommended by the Pearson Report.
No.
Scotland
Male Unemployment
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how the current percentage rate of total and male unemployment in Scotland compares with other European Economic Community countries.
Information is not available in the form requested. On 14 May 1981 the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate in Scotland was 12.3 per cent. and the comparable rate for male unemployment was 14·5 per cent.The following table shows the percentage rates for total and male unemployment in the United Kingdom and other member countries of the European Economic Community for May 1981, the latest month for which information is available. These rates are not comparable with the Scottish seasonally adjusted rate since they have been partially standardised.
| Percentage unemployment rates | ||
| Total | Male | |
| Belgium | 10·5 | 7·0 |
| Denmark | 7·8 | 8·5 |
| France | 7·2 | 5·8 |
| Germany | 4·2 | 3·4 |
| Greece | 0·8 | 0·8 |
| Ireland | 10·1 | 10·8 |
| Italy | 8·4 | 6·7 |
| Luxembourg | 0·8 | 0·6 |
| Netherlands | 6·5 | 6·4 |
| United Kingdom | 9·8 | 11·7 |
Less Favoured Areas
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether the survey into the less favoured areas in Scotland has yet been completed; and when he expects to publish the results.
The survey work in Scotland is nearly completed, but the results will have to be correlated with those for the other parts of the United Kingdom and supporting economic and demographic data assembled and tested against the criteria in the less-favoured area directive. My right hon. Friends and I expect to decide before the end of the year whether a case should be put to the European Commission for an extension of the United Kingdom less-favoured areas.
Planning Inquiry Commission
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what criteria he uses when determining whether to set up a planning inquiry commission under section 45 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1972; how many have been set up since 1972; and what were the subjects of these commissions.
The criteria for referring a planning matter to a planning inquiry commission are set out in section 45(2) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1972. No planning inquiry commissions have been constituted since 1972.
Football Matches (Crowd Behaviour)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether the introduction of the measures contained in part V of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 1980 has brought about any improvement in behaviour at football matches; and if he will make a statement.
I am most encouraged by the reports which I have received from the football authorities and from the police which indicate clearly that the new measures, which have been in effect only since 1 February 1981, have led to a marked improvement in behaviour at sports grounds throughout Scotland. There is less evidence of drunkenness and of drink-related offensive behaviour both at designated grounds and on coaches travelling to and from those grounds.It is imperative that this good start be maintained during the forthcoming season. If spectators continue to co-operate so readily with the police, the football authorities and the clubs themselves, I am sure that we can look to further success in these efforts to bring about a return to civilised behaviour at football matches.
Consultative Committee On Freshwater Fisheries
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he has reappointed the consultative committee on freshwater fisheries to advise him on proposals for protection orders under the Freshwater and Salmon Fisheries (Scotland) Act 1976.
I am pleased to say that Mr. I. A. Duncan Millar, whom I have asked to serve as chairman, and the following members have accepted my invitation to serve on the reconstituted consultative committee:
- Mr. John Reid
- Mr. A. E. Campbell
- Mr. W. Brown
- Mr. K. Burns
- Mr. T. E. Mathie
- Mr. A. V. Tokely
- Mr. I. A. Lyall
- Mr. J. R. Little
Education And Social Work
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he intends to publish this year the annual reports on education and social work in Scotland.
I have decided to discontinue the publication of the annual reports on education and social work as a contribution to economies in staffing and administrative costs. Much of the information in those reports will still be available in the White Paper on public expenditure, in statistical bulletins and in other departmental publications. The Scottish Education Department issues a regular list of current departmental circulars and memoranda, covering both education and social work, which will in future also include details of other departmental publications; a copy will be placed in the Library. I shall continue to make an annual report to Parliament on the working of community service orders, as required by section 11 of the Community Service by Offenders (Scotland) Act 1978.
Local Authorities (Political Donations)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will legislate to prevent local authorities from seeking information from potential contractors on contributions they may have made to political parties; and if he will make a statement.
I know of only one local authority—Lothian regional council—which has sought such information, and I hope that it will not be necessary to legislate solely on its account.The selection of contractors for inclusion on an approved list for tender purposes should be made solely on the basis of an appraisal of their likely ability to carry out the required work within the tender price, up to specification, within the law and on time. The information requested by Lothian regional council seems to me to be entirely irrelevant to the assessment of such questions of technical capacity.I understand that many companies have refused to provide it and I believe that this response is justified. I hope that when the regional council considers the matter again it will agree to drop its ill-advised request.
Energy
Gas-Gathering Pipeline
26.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy whether he will enter into guarantees sufficient to facilitate an immediate start on a gas-gathering pipeline from the North Sea.
Work on the North Sea gas-gathering pipeline project was started last year by the members of the organising group—British Gas, BP and Mobil—and is continuing. On financing, the organising group is examining the responses of oil companies invited to consider participation in the project.
Home Department
Sunday Trading Laws
25.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether, in view of the statement made by the Minister of State, Home Office the hon. Member for Aylesbury (Mr. Raison) on 7 May that he hoped to make a statement about the Sunday trading laws before the Summer Recess, he is now in a position to do so.
I regret that my right hon. Friend is still not in a position to make this statement, but aims to do so after the Summer Recess.
Civil Disorder (Control Equipment)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the gaseous sensory irritants, lacrimators and sternutators available to the police in controlling riots, together with their primary actions and the prolonged atoxic effects which they could have on innocent bystanders.
The only such material available to the police at the present time is CS-orthochlorobenzylidene malononitrile. A detailed assessment of the medical and toxological aspects of the use of this agent is contained in the "Report of the enquiry into the Medical and Toxicological aspects of CS", Cmnd 4173 and 4775.
Parole Board (Chairman)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether, in view of the party political activities of the chairman of the Parole Board, he will dismiss him from office.
No.
Voluntary Organisations
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the total grant to the Voluntary Services Unit in 1980; what organisations he supported; and by how much.
I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given to a question by the hon. Member for Dundee, East (Mr. Wilson) on 6 March and to the reply to a question by the right hon. Member for Manchester, Wythenshawe (Mr. Morris) on 8 April. In addition, the Voluntary Services Unit administers grants-in-aid to the Women's Royal Voluntary Service and the National Council for Voluntary Organisations. Grant-in-aid to WRVS was £3,576,000 and to NCVO £663,000 in 1980–81.
Metropolitan Police (Fingerprint And Photographic Records)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement setting out the procedures followed by the Metropolitan Police concerning the retention of fingerprint and photographic records, respectively, affecting persons who have been released following arrest or acquitted of the charge in respect of which the arrest took place.
Fingerprints and photographs are retained by the Metropolitan Police if criminal proceedings are instituted and result in a conviction. Subject to the following three exceptions, they are destroyed in all other circumstances. First, fingerprints and photographs taken under the provisions of the Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1976 are retained. Secondly, the photographs—but not the fingerprints—of a person charged with an offence under section 6(3) of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 or section 22 of the Theft Act 1968 are retained for a limited period in the event of his acquittal. Thirdly, if a case on indictment is ordered by a court to remain on the file, not to be proceeded with without leave, fingerprints and photographs are retained for five years, unless the circumstances of the case justify their earlier destruction, if a plea of not guilty has been entered, and retained indefinitely otherwise.
Council Elections (Costs)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is the average cost to public funds of a whole council election (a) in a non-metropolitan district, (b) in a non-metropolitan county, and (c) to the Greater London Council.
The cost of local elections is not recorded centrally and the information could be made available only at disproportionate cost.
Citizens Band Radio
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what communications he has received from the European Economic Community or interested parties in the European Economic Community on the subject of citizens band radio.
The European Commission has received a complaint alleging that our plans for introducing a legal citizens band service constitute a barrier to trade under the Treaty of Rome, and has asked us for our comments. We have also been asked to take part in a survey of practices within the member States of the Community carried out by a firm of consultants on behalf of the Commission. At an earlier stage, the European Citizens Band Federation, whose membership I understand to extend beyond the Community, urged me to adopt a specification which it favoured and which was well outside that recommended by CEPT.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is his estimate of the number of illegal citizens band radio sets in use in the United Kingdom at present.
I have nothing to add to the answer I gave to a question by my hon. Friend on 28 July.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what manufacturers will be able to supply frequency synthesis circuits for the legal 27MHz citizens band service within six months of the legalisation of this service.
We understand that several companies plan to have available in quantity CB sets conforming to the legal specification in the autumn.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department, in view of the fact that following his announcement that United Kingdom citizens band radio was to use 27MHz many importers have bought 27MHz antennae for sale in the United Kingdom which are to be illegal under his proposed regulations, if he will reconsider his proposals for vehicle antennae since interference from high-gain antennae does not involve mobile stations.
I have the question of aerials for CB equipment under review, and hope to announce my decision shortly.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he is satisfied that the 27MHz sets in illegal use at present can be easily converted to the new legal FM frequency.
My responsibility is only to ensure that proper specifications for equipment are made for the protection of other users of radio.
Police Activity (Railton Road)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he was consulted before the police activity in Railton Road on 15 July.
No. This was properly a matter under the operational control of the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis.
Citizenship Applications (Report)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will publish the report of the departmental scrutiny under the guidance of Sir Derek Rayner into the handling of applications for citizenship of the United Kingdom and Colonies; and whether he will make a statement.
I have arranged for copies of the report to be placed in the Libraries of both Houses, together with a note of the action taken as a result of the report.The report made a number of detailed recommendations. A large proportion have been implemented or agreed. Others are still being pursued. In addition, every effort is being made, in the spirit of the report, to improve and simplify further the procedures followed in the processing of applications for citizenship.
The report concluded that in general the existing procedures were necessary and operating with due regard for economy in manpower; that the nationality division was likely to continue to face the receipt of applications at a higher level than current staff levels could absorb; and that the alternatives appeared to be the provision of additional staff or the acceptance of longer delays.
The number of applications for citizenship increased from about 32,500 in 1977 to about 50,500 in 1980. The number of applications in the first five months of 1981 was about 37,000 compared with about 22,500 in the corresponding period in 1980.
The Government must have regard to the overriding need to contain public expenditure, which among other things means limiting the size and the cost of the Civil Service. It will not be possible at present to provide additional staff to the extent necessary to reduce the present lengthy delays. Whilst the report's recommendations and subsequent review have helped to speed up the processing of individual applications, I regret that for as long as the number of applications continues at its present high level and arrears increase it is unlikely that there will be any improvement in overall waiting times in the near future. Rather, the position is likely to deteriorate. The average time taken to complete consideration of an application for the naturalisation or discretionary registration of an adult is now 25 months. It is likely to be 28 months by the end of this year, and may be three years by the end of 1982. Other applications for registration now take 13 months and may take two years by the end of 1982.
Rainbow Theatre (Police Action)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for Northampton, North, on 22 July, whether any police were present at the Rainbow theatre at the time a young man was murdered there on 13 July; and, if so, what action they took.
I understand from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis that no police were present inside the Rainbow theatre on 13 July. There were police outside the theatre for the purpose of controlling traffic and crowds. On learning of the incident involving injury to the young man they entered the theatre and commenced their investigations.
Police (Complaints)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the outcome of the discussion in the: Police Advisory Board for England and Wales on 15 July about the procedure for investigating complaints against the police.
As I explained at the time of the publication on 18 March of the report of the Plowden working party, I intended, in the light of that report, and against the background of the general considerations mentioned in the Police Complaints Board's triennial review report, to examine further, in consultation with the Police Advisory Board, what changes, if any, might be necessary in the present arrangements. On 15 July the board, which includes representatives of the local authority associations as well as of the police representative bodies, considered two papers. The first dealt with the main recommendations of the triennial review report and the Plowden working party report, and the second dealt with a number of subsidiary complaints and police discipline matters, some of which had been put to the Police Advisory Board before. Having discussed the issues briefly, the board decided they would all benefit from a further study by a sub-group of the board under the chairmanship of my noble Friend the Under-Secretary of State.Accordingly, in consultation with the bodies represented on the board, I propose to set up a working group with terms of reference requiring it to consider the matters before the board on 15 July and report upon them to the board. I hope that this further period of study will help secure a greater measure of agreement amongst board members about the future development of complaints procedures. It remains my view that it is vital to maintain public confidence in the complaints system. Accordingly I look forward to the working group producing a report as soon as practicable.
Industry
British Telecommunications
asked the Secretary of State for Industry what measures he intends to take in respect of the postal monopoly after enactment of the British Telecommunications Bill.
In my right hon. Friend's statement to the House on 16 July 1980 he set out the Government's intention to remove certain categories of mail from the scope of the postal monopoly. The British Telecommunications Act also contains provisions which give the Secretary of State the power to make further relaxations to the monopoly in certain circumstances.After consultation with all interested parties, including the Post Office, I now propose to take the following measures to remove certain categories of mail from the scope of the monopoly:
I shall shortly issue the general licences and lay the statutory instrument for the suspension of the monopoly in respect of time sensitive-valuable mail.
In addition to these specific derogations, my right hon. Friend also announced on 16 July 1980 that he would be seeking to amend the law relating to the Post Office letter monopoly in order to provide for powers to make relaxations in respect of certain further categories of mail and to remove the monopoly either in a local area or nationally in the event of actions within the control of the Post Office which result in a cessation or serious decline in the quality of service, or if, after due warning, the Post Office fails for reasons within its control to satisfy him as to its performance in serving the public. The criteria which will be used in deciding whether to make further derogations are still under consideration.
The Post Office has already taken steps to become more responsive to customer needs. These measures and the powers taken to make further relaxations where customer needs require will reinforce these steps and will ensure that the nation has a postal service dedicated to providing good service at a reasonable price.
asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he intends to implement the recommendations in Professor Beesley's report on the British Telecommunications network; and whether he will make a statement.
I refer my hon. Friend to the statement I gave earlier today.
Engineering Council
asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he will make a statement on the proposed Engineering Council.
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Industry has sent the Lord President of the Council a draft Royal Charter which would establish the Engineering Council, and has recommended that the Privy Council advise Her Majesty The Queen to grant that charter. I have placed a copy of the draft charter in the Library of the House.I am very pleased to announce that Sir Kenneth Corfield has agreed to become chairman designate of the Engineering Council.The draft charter provides that the objects of the council would be to advance education in, and to promote the science and practice of engineering—including relevant technology—for the public benefit and thereby to promote industry and commerce in the United Kingdom. The council's task would, therefore, be to advance what the Finniston report called the "engineering dimension"—to help to harness this country's engineering expertise into the production and marketing of internationally competitive products and into wealth creation.For this purpose the Government see the need for the close involvement of employers and senior managers in industries in which engineers and technicians play an important part; of those in the various sectors of the education system concerned with the preparation of engineers and technicians; and of engineers and technicians themselves and their representative bodies.The proposed Engineering Council is intended to be a focal point with which and through which all can co-operate in the national interest. The council would promote the development of academic courses and industrial training programmes for new entrants to engineering. Even more important in the short term, as the Finniston report recognised, would be the task of updating and developing the existing stock of engineers. The Government would look to the council to ensure that opportunities are available by part-time study and continuing education for engineers and technicians to obtain and enhance their levels of qualification and to update their knowledge. By involving all those concerned the council would seek to ensure that engineers and technicians were better equipped to deal with rapidly changing technologies and that their skills were effectively used to improve the performance of industry.The draft charter would require the council to establish a national register, open to anyone meeting the council's standards and criteria, with three sections: professional engineers; technician engineers; and engineering technicians. Within each of these sections, registration would be at three stages: stage 1 for those who had achieved appropriate standards of engineering education; stage 2 for those who had also achieved appropriate standards of engineering training; and stage 3 for those who had acquired appropriate experience as engineers or technicians.I am confident that the council would attach high priority to determining, in collaboration with all those concerned, the standards and criteria for admission to its register. The draft charter provides that the council should endeavour to complete this task as soon as practicable and at most within two years.Under the draft charter it would be the council that controlled the accreditation of academic courses, industrial training programmes and arrangements for experience satisfying its standards and criteria. But the council would use as its agents, to the maximum extent possible, engineering institutions and other bodies which it nominated for this purpose. The transition period mentioned above would enable those bodies wishing to seek nomination to make any necessary changes in their arrangements.Many engineers are already registered by the Engineers Registration Board. The draft charter would safeguard their position by providing that they shall be admitted at stage 3 of the appropriate section of the council's register. The charter also provides for the council to admit to its register members of other bodies which the council is satisfied meet the appropriate standards.In view of the widespread interest which has been expressed, I should explain what is envisaged would happen to the title of "Chartered Engineer". At present this is granted by the Council of Engineering Institutions under its Royal Charter. The discussions with the leaders of the profession have been on the basis that the title should be made available to the Engineering Council at the end of the transition period, although this change would require a petition to The Queen which would have to be approved by the membership of the CEI. Once the title was available to the Engineering Council anyone on its register as a professional engineer at stage 3 would then be able to call himself a "Chartered Engineer" provided that he was a member of a nominated chartered engineering institution or an affiliate; or, if there was no such body for the branch of engineering concerned, of a body affiliated to the council. This latter possibility would cater for new disciplines emerging as a result of new technologies. Any such person who did not wish to join such a body would still be able to indicate that he was a registered professional engineer at stage 3.The draft charter requires that the membership of the council should provide a reasonable balance amongst those having experience and knowledge of the major areas of industry, the significant engineering disciplines and their learned societies, and those concerned with the education and training of engineers and technicians.To facilitate the council's establishment, under the draft charter my right hon. Friend would be responsible for making appointments to the council for the first three years: he would make such appointments as individuals and not as representatives of any particular interest group. It is envisaged that Sir Kenneth Corfield's appointment as chairman would run until the end of that period.After the initial three years, the chairman and other members—between 15 and 24 in number—would be selected by the council in accordance with its byelaws. At least one half of the membership would have to have experience as employers or managers of practising engineers and engineering technicians; and the chairman and at least two-thirds of the other members would have to be chartered engineers, selected from a list of names put forward by employers' organisations, educational institutions or nominated chartered engineering institutions.The Government would help finance the council's initial running costs, but the firm intention is that the council should become financially independent as soon as possible.The draft charter is the result of consultation with employers' organisations, educational interests, the engineering institutions, trade unions and others. For the council to be a success, it needs the broad support of the interests concerned. I am confident that everyone would now wish the council well and that it would be able to depend on their support in order to achieve the improvements in our engineering practices which are so vital to the national interest.
Textiles And Chemicals (Capital Investment)
asked the Secretary of State for Industry what was the capital per employee expressed in thousands of £. sterling at constant prices in (a) textile manufacturing and (b) chemicals in the United Kingdom in 1978, 1979, 1980 and 1981.
The information is as follows:
| Gross Capital Stock at 1975 replacement cost per employee | ||
| £000 | ||
| Textiles Industries | Chemicals and Allied Industries | |
| end 1978 | 14·6 | 33·9 |
| end 1979 | 15·5 | 35·3 |
| end 1980 | 18·5 | 39·1 |
Sources:
Capital stock: Central Statistical Office
Employment: Monthly Digest of Statistics
Note:
Estimates of gross capital stock are on an ownership basis and therefore do not include assets held by manufacturers on lease from the service industries.
Manufacturing Capacity
asked the Secretary of State for Industry (1) whether he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the current level of manufacturing capacity and the level each year since 1970, based on 1970=100, the corresponding level of output as a percentage of capacity, and his estimate of the amount by which output could be increased in 1982 and 1983 if a market could be found for everything that industry could produce;(2) whether he will publish a table in the
Official Report showing the changes in manufacturing capacity since May 1979, broken down into minimum list headings.
The information requested is not available. Some indication of the extent of the under-utilisation of manufacturing capacity is given by the published analyses of the responses to the survey by the Confederation of British Industry on industrial trends, copies of which are available in the Library.
Manufacturing Industry
asked the Secretary of State for Industry what has been the reduction in output per head in manufacturing industry since May 1979.
Estimates of output per head are published quarterly. Output per head in manufacturing industry fell by 7½ per cent. between the second quarter of 1979 and the first quarter of 1981. However, because of changes in the number of hours worked, this is not indicative of changes in productivity.
asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will publish a table showing for each of the last five years the average rate of return on capital invested in manufacturing industry in the United Kingdom.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
British Shipbuilders
asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he has received British Shipbuilders' annual report and accounts for 1980–81.
My right hon. Friend today, in accordance with sections 17(9) and 18(6) of the Aircraft and Shipbuilding Industries Act 1977, has laid before each House copies of British Shipbuilders' annual report and accounts for 1980–81.
Post Office Pension Fund
asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he has yet taken a decision on the future of the Post Office pension fund.
I have sent the following letter to Sir Henry Chilver, the chairman of the Post Office.
You wrote to Keith Joseph on 26 January with the Post Office Board recommendation that the present pension fund should be split into two following the creation of British Telecommunications. Your letter also contained other possible solutions for the future of the Fund. Since then, Bryan Stanley of the POEU, has written to Keith reflecting the views of five of the unions involved and Sir Daniel Pettit wrote on behalf of the Trustees. We have also had letters from Kenneth Glynn of SPOE and the pensioners organisations, and either Michael Marshall or I have held meetings with all interested parties so that everyone has been able to explain their views. The whole subject of pensions has also been debated in both Houses of Parliament on a number of occasions during the passage of the BT Act.
This is a complex problem, and one that is rightly viewed as one of the most important decisions consequent on the reorganisation of the Post Office. I have been greatly helped in understanding the issues involved by the meetings that I have had with you, the Trustees and the unions. Pensions affect the lives of all who work in the Post Office and British Telecommunications, and the need to safeguard the position of all pensioners and members of the fund is reflected in the BT Act. As you know, section 33(3) requires the Secretary of State to amend any order which would otherwise place any individual in a worse position than he would have been in if the order had not been made.
I would very much have preferred to use the powers in the Act to implement a solution which had the consent of all parties but my discussions have shown that is not possible. It is clear to me, as I think to everyone else, that there will be a need to maintain discrete accounts of the pension liabilities and assets relating to the staff and pensioners of each corporation. That will be necessary to meet the requirements of the Inland Revenue. Having given very careful thought to all the arguments that have been advanced I also believe that the unions and management of each corporation should be free to consider pensions and related benefits without being obliged by the pension arrangements themselves to have reference or regard to the other corporation.
For these reasons, I think there should be separate pension schemes for BT and the Post Office, each with its own trust deed and separate body of trustees. To my mind, and without prejudice to the nature of the investment arrangements, this implies that there should be scope for the two sets of trustees to adopt different investment policies, should they wish to do so. The Trust Deed for the Post Office will remain substantially unchanged but a new deed will have to be prepared for BT. I need hardly say that I would not, indeed could not, approve any new scheme for BT which did not embody the same level of pensions and other benefits and the same level of funding arrangements as the present Post Office scheme. I would be grateful if you could begin the preparation of such a scheme and the associated trust deed in consultation of course with the unions.
This does, of course, leave open the question of the investment arrangements for the two schemes, and in particular whether there should be a common investment organisation and fund. The arguments here seem finely balanced and I have an open mind. In any case I should much prefer the question to be resolved by those most directly involved, that is the trustees, members of the scheme, and the corporations who carry the onus of making good any deficiencies. I hope, therefore, that you can begin consultations with the unions and the present trustees on the investment arrangements for the two schemes.
I think it important that the uncertainty about the future investment arrangements should be removed as quickly as possible. I would like to see the period within which the interim measures operate kept to a minimum and the new arrangements in force, if at all possible, within a year from the appointed day. This points to an early decision on the investment arrangements and I would be grateful if you would report the results of your consultations before the end of September.
I would be prepared to give effect to any reasonable agreed solution and the Lords amendments to the previous pensions clause were designed to make sure that all likely options are indeed possible.
I am copying this letter to the General Secretaries of the unions and to Sir Daniel Pettit, and also to Sir George Jefferson and Ron Dearing.
Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs
Republic Of Ireland (Foreign Minister)
asked the Lord Privy Seal when next he expects to meet the Foreign Minister of the Republic of Ireland.
The Irish Minister for Industry, Commerce and Tourism, Dr. Kelly, is acting Foreign Minister until the Foreign Minister designate, Professor Dooge, has his appointment confirmed by the Irish Parliament. I expect next to meet them at the Foreign Affairs Council in Brussels on 14–15 September.
Maze Prison (United States Government)
asked the Lord Privy Seal whether he has had any recent contacts with the United States Government on matters arising from the hunger strike in Her Majesty's prison, Maze.
No.
Mediterranean-Dead Sea Canal
asked the Lord Privy Seal what is the policy of Her Majesty's Government to the proposal by Israel to build a canal linking the Mediterranean to the Dead Sea.
The project as planned is contrary to international law, as it involves unlawful works in occupied territory and infringes Jordan's legal rights in the Dead Sea and neighbouring regions. No official support will be given by Her Majesty's Government in respect of the project.
Diplomatic Service (Language Training)
asked the Lord Privy Seal if he will make a statement on the comments on language training in the Diplomatic Service made by the Foreign Affairs Committee in its recent report.
The Committee's recommendations will be studied carefully. Its views on language training in the Diplomatic Service are generally helpful. But certain percentage figures as presented in this report may be misleading.The most important question in this field is whether those Diplomatic Service staff whose official duties bring them into regular contact with foreign Governments have the knowledge of the local language they need. In Paris and Bonn, to which the Committee refers, all such staff have these linguistic skills. The staff who do not are among those whose work does not bring them into regular contact with the French and German Governments.Many of the Diplomatic Service linguists are very fluent. We are well served by them.
Diego Garcia
asked the Lord Privy Seal whether he will announce details of the United States of America's plans to expand their facilities on Diego Garcia.
As I told the hon. Member for West Lothian (Mr. Dalyell) on 17 June 1980, the previous United States Administration consulted us about plans for a programme to expand the facilities on Diego Garcia. This programme involves numerous construction projects extending over several years. They include improving the services and utilities on the island, including refuelling arrangements, expansion of storage, warehousing, maintenance and wharf installations, and the upgrading of runway and other airfield support facilities to a standard which will allow use of the facility as required by a wide range of heavy aircraft including B52s. We have agreed to these plans.The present United States Administration have confirmed that they intend to proceed with this development programme and are now seeking budgetary authority to set work in hand. Projects expected to start in 1981–82 include the construction of a new airfield taxiway and parking apron to B52 specifications and the construction of extra accommodation for United States personnel. The Government welcome these plans to improve the facilities on Diego Garcia which fills an important role in the protection of Western interests in the area.
European Community
Council Of Ministers
asked the Lord Privy Seal if he will publish in the Official Report a statement of forthcoming business in the European Community Council of Ministers.
No meetings of the Council of Ministers are planned for August, and at present seven meetings of the council are scheduled for September and October. The usual written forecast was deposited in the House on 28 July.The Foreign Affairs Council will meet on 14–15 September and 26–27 October.The September Council is expected to carry forward work on the 30 May mandate and discuss arrangements for low-cost textile imports from the Community's preferential suppliers and for outward processing of textiles. The Council is also expected to discuss North-South issues, with particular reference to the forthcoming summit meeting in Mexico, arrangements for trade with Cyprus for 1982–83, and a proposal to improve the procedures for administering the Community's food aid programme. Ministers may also consider whether the Community should join the international tin agreement.The October Council is expected to discuss a Commission mandate to negotiate voluntary restraint arrangements covering exports of steel from certain Yhird world countries to the Community in 1982; post-1981 arrangements for low-cost textile imports, including renewal of the multi-fibre arrangement; the outcome of the North-South summit meeting and draft guidelines on the European Regional Development Fund. Ministers are also likely to discuss economic aspects of the Euro-Arab dialogue and preparations for the ministerial meeting proposed for later in the year; continue discussion on the 30 May mandate; give further consideration to whether the Community should join the international tin agreement and continue the negotiations with Spain on her accession to the Community. The Council is also expected to approve a new method of calculating staff pay and may be asked to approve directives on rights of establishment for transport auxiliaries and an amending directive on rights of establishment for the medical professions.The Finance Council is expected to meet on 17 September and 19 October. The September Council is expected to discuss a Community position in preparation for further negotiations on changes to the international consensus on export credits and continue consideration of the draft non-life insurance services directive and the new Community instrument. The October Council is expected to discuss the Commission's proposals for restructuring the Community budget contained in the Commission report on the 30 May mandate.The Agriculture Council is expected to meet on 28 September to discuss various commodity, structures and animal health matters. It will meet again on 19–20 October when it is expected to discuss the Commission's report on the 30 May mandate as well as a range of other matters.The Fisheries Council is expected to meet on 29 September to discuss proposals for a revised common fisheries policy and relations with third world countries.
Paymaster General
Pensions
asked the Paymaster General if he will now take steps to ensure that public service pensioners can obtain their pensions from post offices or other Government Departments during the present Civil Service dispute.
Details of emergency arrangements for the issue of public service pensions have been published in the national press and displayed in post offices. These include the issue of an advance to pensioners, in case of need, who write to my office at Crawley. Weekly paid pensioners should apply to their usual post office for emergency payments. I regret that it is impracticable for the emergency issue of pensions to be made through other Government Departments.
House Of Commons
Hon Members (Travelling Costs)
asked the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster whether the issue of season tickets for travel in the Greater London area between home arid Westminster to hon. Members over the age which qualifies for free travel on London Transport will now cease.
The issue of permits for free travel on London Transport to persons of pensionable age is subject to a number of conditions, one of which precludes travel before 9.30 am on weekdays. Such a restriction is unlikely to be acceptable to hon. Members generally, but it is of course open to any hon. Member who is prepared to accept this limitation to make personal application to a post office for a permit and to surrender his season ticket to the Fees Office so that a refund may be obtained.
Broadcasting Costs
asked the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what is the annual cost to public funds of the broadcasting of parliamentary proceedings.
For the financial year 1980–81 expenditure incurred by the Department of the Environment on the sound broadcasting of parliarnentary proceedings totalled £43,520. In addition, the cost of the transcription of evidence and the fees and expenses of specialist advisers to the Select Committee on Sound Broadcasting totalled £1,166. That Committee also has the part-time services of one Clerk and one personal secretary. The parliamentary sound archives are staffed by three full-time members and one part-time member of the House of Lords Record Office, all of whom have general duties in that office in addition to their work on the archives. Details of the costs borne by the broadcasters are matters for them.
Employment
"Payments Of Benefits To Unemployed People"
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will summarise reactions during the consultation period to the report "Payments of Benefits to Unemployed People"; and if he will announce the Government's decisions on the report's recommendations.
The three major proposals in the report were that registration for employment at a jobcentre should no longer be a pre-condition of entitlement to benefit; that administration of unemployment benefit and supplementary benefit for unemployed people should be centred on one office; and that abuse of the benefit system should be measured and more resources devoted to combating it. The report was published on 20 March and comments invited. Some 70 organisations and individuals responded, most of them concentrating on the three main proposals.As far as making registration for employment voluntary is concerned, comments have varied widely between those who oppose it, generally on the ground that it may reduce the help given to unemployed people, including those who are disabled. Concern has been expressed that the need in present circumstances for controls against possible abuse of benefits should not be exaggerated and the positive role of the public employment service be given insufficient emphasis.In the light of these varied comments, the Government have decided to accept the recommendation that for those aged 18 and over registration for employment should no longer be a condition for receipt of unemployment and supplementary benefits. Legislation will be introduced with the aim of implementing the recommendations in October 1982. The Government consider that this change will bring advantages both for the employment service and for unemployed people, while at the same time making useful economies through the elimination of unnecessary procedures.The Government have also decided to accept the recommendation that, as part of the move to voluntary registration, there should be a test of availability in benefit offices when a claim is first made and amendment of the rules on restricted availability. The precise changes to these latter rules have still to be decided and proposals will be put to the social security advisory committee in due course.On further consideration, the Government have decided to increase the number of unemployment review officers in the Department of Health and Social Security by 50, instead of the 300 recommended in the report, and to allocate 250 staff to the public employment service to provide additional help to longer-term unemployed people in finding jobs, working in co-operation with the UROs.As regards unemployed disabled people, the Government intend, under voluntary registration, to give them particular encouragement to use the services available to them in jobcentres publicising these services fully at both unemployment benefit and social security offices.The consultations have reflected widespread agreement with the principle that unemployed people should have to deal with only one office for their benefits, but some concern that, while unemployment benefit offices are the appropriate contact point for unemployed people, assessment of supplementary benefit for unemployed people should remain in DHSS offices linked to the main social security system. In their initial response to the report, the Government accepted the principle of the recommendation, but set in hand further work to see how this principle might best be achieved. The results of this further work are now being considered and the Government's decision will be made known as soon as possible. Meanwhile, the Government will be going ahead with a number of procedural changes which, while they would be achieved as part of the one office proposal, could also be made independently.The comments have tended to reflect the Government's own doubts about the statistical accuracy of the report's estimate of the level of benefit fraud and to agree on the need for more soundly based estimates. At the same time these is concern that genuine claimants—the vast majority—should not suffer. The Government have carefully considered, in the light of the comments made, how best to obtain more soundly based estimates of the level of benefit fraud and have concluded that it would be wrong to investigate for this purpose unemployed people where there is no cause for suspicion. Investigations under the exercise will therefore concentrate on cases where the papers held by the Department of Employment or the Department of Health and Social Security give some grounds for thinking that the claim could be fraudulent. Full details of the exercise have still to be worked out.As regards the report's recommendation that more staff should be engaged in special reviews of cases in areas of high fraud risk, 30 additional staff will be employed on this work in the Department of Employment as a first step. In the Department of Health and Social Security some 150 existing fraud specialists will be redeployed to this work.Some recommendations in the report require further study, taking account of the comments. There are, however, many procedural changes with which progress can be made, and the Government intend to move on these as quickly as possible. Overall, the change to voluntary registration and the procedural recommendations in the report which the Government have already decided to implement will lead to staff savings of around 1,650, representing an annual saving of some £13 million. In addition, the procedural changes which the Government are pursuing independently of the one office proposal could, depending on the outcome of further work, save about an additional 2,000 staff, representing an annual saving of £15 million.
Disabled Persons
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is his estimate of (a) the total number of registered disabled persons who are currently in employment and (b) the number of such persons who are registered unemployed.
The number of registered disabled persons who are currently in employment is unknown. The register of disabled people, at 21 April 1981, the latest date available, totalled 460,178. At 11 June 1981 there were 72,742 registered disabled people unemployed. The remaining 387,436 registered disabled people included not only those who are in employment, but also others who are sick or no longer in the employment field.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will give, for the latest available date, the numerical and percentage change in the numbers of (a) registered, (b) unregistered and (c) total disabled people who have been unemployed since May 1979.
[pursuant to his reply, 28 July 1981]: The information requested on the number of disabled people unemployed, as at 10 May 1979, and 11 June 1981, the latest date for which the information is available, is as follows:
| Registered Disabled People | Unregistered Disabled People | Total | |
| 10 May 1979 | 61,801 | 72,155 | 133,956 |
| 11 June 1981 | 72,742 | 106,986 | 179,728 |
| Change | +10,941 | +34,831 | +45,772 |
| Percentage change | +17·7 | +48·3 | +34·2 |
Unemployment Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many were unemployed at the latest available date in the construction industry and also in the brick, timber, glass and furniture industries, respectively; and what were the corresponding figures two years earlier.
The following table gives for May 1979 and May 1981, the latest date for which the information is available, the numbers registered as unemployed in the United Kingdom who last worked in the industries specified. The analysis is based on minimum list headings (MLHs) of the 1968 standard industrial classification.
| May 1979 | May 1981 | |
| Construction (MLH 500) | 174,656 | 381,285 |
| Bricks, fireclay ard refractory goods (MLH 461) | 2,483 | 5,342 |
| Glass (MLH 463) | 3,277 | 8,746 |
| Timber (MLH 471) | 3,546 | 8,300 |
| Furniture and upholstery (MLH 472) | 5,185 | 12,671 |
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list all the travel-to-work areas in Great Britain in descending order according to the latest percentage unemployment rate in each; and in each case if he will give the designation in terms of qualification for Government assistance.
I shall reply to the right hon. Member as soon as possible.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the unemployment level in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries, excluding the European Economic Community; and how this compares with the level in the European Economic Community.
The latest available information published by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, based on national definitions, relates to the first quarter of 1981. The rate including member countries of the European Community was 7 per cent.; a rate excluding European Community countries is not available. For the same period the corresponding rate published by the Statistical Office of the European Community for the 10 European Community countries was 7·5 per cent. The rates are not directly comparable because of national differences in coverage, concepts and methods of compilation.
Paper And Board Industry
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people working in the United Kingdom paper and board industry were made redundant in 1980; and how many have been made redundant so far in the current year.
There is no comprehensive statistics of redundancies. The number of redundancies, involving 10 or more employees, reported to the Manpower Services Commission as due to occur in the paper and board industry—SIC minimum list heading 481—in Great Britain in 1980 is 5,271; in 1981 up to and including June the number so far reported is 3,153* including provisional figures for May and June.
* Note: Figures for February 1981 or later are not fully comparable with those for January 1981 and earlier, because of improvements in data collection designed to secure a better coverage of reported redundancies which are actually expected to take place.
Manufacturing Industry
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the proportion of operatives to other workers in manufacturing industry; what has been the increase in productivity in each case since May 1979 in terms of output per head and output per person hour; and whether he expects the increase in productivity of non-operatives to catch up with that of the operatives and over what period.
In October 1980, the latest date for which figures are available, operatives made up 70 per cent. of all employees in manufacturing industries. Since it is not possible to apportion output between operatives and other workers, the productivity of the two groups cannot be compared.
Beverley (Job Vacancies)
Wall asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list the total number of registered job vacancies in Beverley and provide a breakdown by standard industrial classification.
The following is the information for the Beverley employment office area at 8 May, the latest date for which an industrial analysis is available.
| Standard Industrial Classification 1968 | At the Employment Office | At the Careers Office |
| Mechanical engineering | 1 | — |
| Metal goods not elsewhere specified | 1 | — |
| Construction | 2 | 1 |
| Gas, electricity and water | 2 | — |
| Transport and communication | 4 | — |
| Distributive trades | 7 | 1 |
| Insurance, banking, finance and business services | 2 | 1 |
| Professional and scientific services | 9 | — |
| Miscellaneous services | 16 | — |
| Public administration | 4 | — |
| Total | 48 | 3 |
Vacancies notified to employment offices are estimated to account for about one-third of all vacancies in the economy as a whole. The number of vacancies unfilled at a particular date takes no account of the flow of vacancies being notified, filled or withdrawn during the preceding month, which would reflect activity more closely.
Work Experience Scheme (Newcastle-Under-Lyme)
asked the Secretary of State for Employment which is the largest employer in the area of Newcastle-under-Lyme borough council under the work experience scheme.
The employer providing the largest number of work experience places under the youth opportunities programme in the area of Newcastle-under-Lyme is the Staffordshire county council.
Industrial Training Boards
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will announce decisions to abolish those industrial training boards which are no longer required in order to end uncertainty about future training arrangements.
I have received from the Manpower Services Commission the report on its sector by sector review of arrangements for industrial and commercial training, which is published today. Copies have been placed in the Library of the House. I welcome the Commission's thorough discussion of the needs of each sector, and the views of those involved. I shall need to study the report carefully, and to consider representations from those concerned. However, it is now very important to end uncertainty, and to announce decisions as soon as is consistent with giving proper consideration to the issues involved. Those who wish to express views on the report, or to put forward or develop proposals for alternative training arrangements, are requested to do so during September to me and the Commission, so that I can be in a position to announce decisions early in the new Session.
Careers Service (Manpower)
asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether the staffing of the careers service will be further strengthened in view of the expansion of the youth opportunities programme announced by the Prime Minister on 27 July.
Yes. In agreement with my right hon. Friends the Secretaries of State for Scotland and Wales I am arranging for a further 125 posts to be made available under the Government's scheme to strengthen the careers service. The Government will be considering the staffing implications for the careers service of further changes to the youth opportunities programmme in 1982–83.
Social Services
One-Parent Families
Howell asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will bring up to date the table on one-parent families' spending power given in a written answer to the hon. Member for Norfolk, North, Official Report,3 July 1980, columns 730–32, under the same assumptions but with work expenses at (a) £16·50, (b) as in the tax-benefit model tables and under the assumption that free school meals entitlement (c) is linked only to family income supplement and (d) operating as on the pre-Education Act 1980 scales.
The information requested is set out in the following tables. The figures are based on the assumptions indicated by my hon. Friend. If the figures are quoted, it will, of course, be necessary also to quote the assumptions.
| Table 1 | |
| Net weekly spending power (£) of a lone mother, with two children aged 4 and 6, receiving supplementary allowance (ordinary rate) and earning £6 (net) a week | |
| £ | |
| Supplementary allowance | 39·10 |
| Child benefit and one parent benefit | 12·50 |
| Net earnings | 6·00 |
| Rent | 11·05 |
| Rates | 4·25 |
| Free school meals | 2·25 |
| Free welfare milk | 1·30 |
| Net weekly spending power | 45·85 |
| Table 2 | |
| Net weekly spending power (£) of a lone mother, with two children aged 4 and 6, receiving supplementary allowance (long-term rate) and earning £6 (net) a week | |
| £ | |
| Supplementary allowance | 44·95 |
| Child benefit and one parent benefit | 12·50 |
| Net earnings | 6·00 |
| Rent | 11·05 |
| Rates | 4·25 |
| Free school meals | 2·25 |
| Free welfare milk | 1·30 |
| Net weekly spending power | 51·70 |
Note on Tables 1 and 2:
Of the net earnings of £6, £5 are disregarded in the calculation of the supplementary allowance.
Table 3
| ||||||||||
Net weekly spending power (£) of a lone mother, with two children aged 4 and 6, working full-time with £16·50 work expenses
| ||||||||||
Gross earnings
| Tax
| National insurance contributions
| Family income Rent supplement (F1S)
| Rent rebate
| Rate rebate
| Free welfare milk
| Free school meals limited to FIS
| Net weekly spending power
| Free school meals on pre 1980 Act basis
| Net weekly spending power
|
| 30·31* | — | 2·35 | 18·50 | 11·05 | 4·09 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 45·85 | 2·25 | 45·85 |
| 35·00 | — | 2·71 | 18·50 | 10·26 | 3·71 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 49·01 | 2·25 | 49·01 |
| 40·00 | — | 3·10 | 17·00 | 9·38 | 3·43 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 50·96 | 2·25 | 50·96 |
| 50·00 | 2·63 | 3·88 | 12·00 | 8·13 | 3·03 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 50·90 | 2·25 | 50·90 |
| 60·00 | 5·63 | 4·65 | 7·00 | 6·88 | 2·63 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 50·48 | 2·25 | 50·48 |
| 70·00 | 8·63 | 5·43 | 2·00 | 5·95 | 2·31 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 50·45 | 2·25 | 50·45 |
| 74·00 | 9·82 | 5·74 | — | 5·61 | 2·19 | — | — | 46·94 | 2·25 | 49·19 |
| 80·00 | 11·63 | 6·20 | — | 4·59 | 1·83 | — | — | 49·29 | 2·25 | 51·54 |
| 80·40† | 11·75 | 6·23 | — | 4·52 | 1·81 | — | — | 49·45 | 2·25 | 51·70 |
| 8615† | 13·47 | 6·68 | — | 3·54 | 1·46 | — | — | 51·70 | 2·25 | 53·95 |
| 90·00 | 14·63 | 6·98 | — | 2·89 | 1·23 | — | — | 53·21 | 2·25 | 55·46 |
| 100·00 | 17·63 | 7·75 | — | 1·19 | 0·63 | — | — | 57·14 | 2·25 | 59·39 |
| 105·00 | 19·13 | 8·14 | — | 0·34 | 0·33 | — | — | 59·10 | 2·25 | 61·35 |
| 107·00 | 19·73 | 8·29 | — | — | 0·21 | — | — | 59·89 | 2·25 | 62·14 |
| 110·00 | 20·63 | 8·53 | — | — | — | — | — | 61·54 | 2·25 | 63·79 |
Table 4
| ||||||||||
Net weekly spending power (£) of a lone mother, with two children aged 4 and 6, working full-time with £4·50 fares to work
| ||||||||||
Gross earnings
| Tax
| National insurance contributions
| Family income supplement (FIS)
| Rent rebate
| Rate rebate
| Free welfare milk
| Free school meals limited to FIS
| Net weekly spending power
| Free school meals on pre 1980 Act basis
| Net weekly spending power
|
| 15·80* | — | — | 18·50 | 11·05 | 4·25 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 45·85 | 2·25 | 45·85 |
| 21·65† | — | — | 18·50 | 11·05 | 4·25 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 51·70 | 2·25 | 51·70 |
| 35·00 | — | 2·71 | 18·50 | 10·26 | 3·71 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 61·01 | 2·25 | 61·01 |
| 40·00 | — | 3·10 | 17·00 | 9·38 | 3·43 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 62·96 | 2·25 | 62·96 |
| 50·00 | 2·63 | 3·88 | 12·00 | 8·13 | 3·03 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 62·90 | 2·25 | 62·90 |
| 60·00 | 5·63 | 4·65 | 7·00 | 6·88 | 2·63 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 62·48 | 2·25 | 62·48 |
| 70·00 | 8·63 | 5·43 | 2·00 | 5·95 | 2·31 | 1·30 | 2·25 | 62·45 | 2·25 | 62·45 |
| 74·00 | 9·82 | 5·74 | — | 5·61 | 2·19 | — | — | 58·94 | 2·25 | 61·19 |
| 80·00 | 11·63 | 6·20 | — | 4·59 | 1·83 | — | — | 61·29 | 2·25 | 63·54 |
| 90·00 | 14·63 | 6·98 | — | 2·89 | 1·23 | — | — | 65·21 | 2·25 | 67·46 |
| 100·00 | 17·63 | 7·75 | — | 1·19 | 0·63 | — | — | 69·14 | 2·25 | 71·39 |
| 105·00 | 19·13 | 8·14 | — | 0·34 | 0·33 | — | — | 71·10 | 2·25 | 73·35 |
| 107·00 | 19·73 | 8·29 | — | — | 0·21 | — | — | 71·89 | — | 71·89 |
| 110·00 | 20·63 | 8·53 | — | — | — | — | — | 73·54 | — | 73·54 |
Notes on tables 3 and 4:
These tables show the net weekly spending power on two bases:
Child benefit of £9·50 and one-parent benefit of £3 are payable throughout.
The annotation * shows the gross earnings needed to provide net weekly spending power equivalent to that with supplementary allowance at the ordinary rate, as in table 1.
The annotation † shows the gross earnings needed to provide net weekly the gross earnings needed to provide net weekly spending power equivalent to that with supplementary allowance at the long term rate, as in table 2
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will give the latest available figures on the number of one-parent families receiving one-parent benefit; how many do not benefit financially from receiving it; and how many lone parents, who would benefit financially from one-parent benefit, do not receive it.
The latest figure of the number of one-parent families receiving one-parent benefit and the estimate of the number not receiving it who would gain if they claimed remain as stated in my recent reply to the hon. Member on 6 July.—[Vol. 8, c. 33–34.] Of those in receipt of one-parent benefit, 128,000 do not gain financially from receiving it.
Ambulance Services (Survey)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will set up a study into the use of the ambulance services, in the light of a recent survey of 1,000 ambulance calls which found that half were unwarranted.
A National Health Service working party has recently completed a study of the ambulance service and 1 expect its report to be published in the autumn. I understand that the working party found little evidence in its own surveys, or in others which have been carried out, to suggest that there is widespread misuse. The survey to which the hon. Member refers was carried out in 1978 and the results reported last year. It was concerned with patients brought following 999 calls to one particular district general hospital, and I have nothing to add to my reply to the hon. Member's question on this subject on 16 July 1980.—[Vol. 989, c.201–2.]
Dr Brian Jarman
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services why his Department has refused financial help for the London-based general practitioner Dr. Brian James to complete his studies into the value for money obtained from bettering general practitioner services by forming group practices in reducing the need for hospitalisation.
I assume that the hon. Member is referring to Dr. Brian Jarman.The Department funded, until 30 June 1981, a research project into prescribing costs in general practice, under the directorship of Dr. Conrad Harris of the department of general practice at St. Mary's hospital medical school; Dr. Brian Jarman was a member of the research team. The final report is awaited.Dr. Harris has requested an extension of funding to 31 December 1981 to enable him to keep his team together while they work up a new research proposal on
"Admissions to Hospital and the extent to which these are determined by General Practitioner's attitudes and Practice organisations".
This request is still under consideration. The Department's research budget for 1981–82 is under severe strain and decisions on all research proposals must await the outcome of a review of priorities now nearing completion. Dr. Harris will be told of the decision on his application at the earliest possible moment.
Cervical Cancer
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the present incidence of cervical cancer; and if he will publish figures showing whether there has been an increase or a decrease in this form of cancer when compared with 1971.
The latest available figures for numbers and for the rates of new registrations for cervical cancer per 100,000 of the female population of all ages are:
| ICD 180 Malignant neoplasm of cervix uteri excluding in situ | ICD 234.0 Carcinoma in situ of cervix uteri | |||
| Year | No. | Rate | No. | Rate |
| 1971 | 4,090 | 16·3 | 2,214 | 8·8 |
| 1972 | 3,943 | 15·6 | 2,320 | 9·2 |
| 1973 | 4,065 | 16·1 | 2,580 | 10·2 |
| 1974 | 4,042 | 16·0 | 2,991 | 11·8 |
| 1975 | 4,031 | 16·0 | 3,186 | 12·6 |
| 1976 | 3,964 | 15·7 | 3,634 | 14·4 |
Family Income Supplement
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what was the average weekly family income supplement payment to one-parent and two-parent families in Scotland in each of the past three years.
I regret that figures are not readily available in the form requested. However, the hon. Member may find it helpful to have the following details of the average weekly payments of family income supplement (FIS) on awards which were current in Scotland at the end of March in each of the past three years.
| Average Weekly Payments of FIS—Awards Current at the end of March Scotland | ||
| Awards current at | One-parent families £ | Two-parent families £ |
| 31 March 1981 | 11.76 | 9.31 |
| 25 March 1980 | 8.92 | 7.50 |
| 27 March 1979 | 5.50 | 4.87 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will give the latest available figures for the numbers of (a) one-parent families and (b) two-parent families in receipt of family income supplement; what was the average payment; and how many received the maximum payment.
The information is given in the following table:
| Families Receiving Family Income Supplement at 31 March 1981 Great Britain | |||
| One-parent families | Two-parent families | All families | |
| Number of families receiving FIS | 53,790 | 50,200 | 103,990 |
| Average weekly payment | £11.09 | £9.40 | £10.27 |
One-parent families
| Two-parent families
| All families
| |
| Number of families receiving maximum payment | 7,750 | 5,290 | 13,040 |
Spending Power
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish figures comparing net weekly spending power when at work, and when unemployed drawing supplementary benefit for (a) a married man with two children aged 11 and 13 years, and (b) a married man with four children aged 4, 6, 11 and 13 years, assuming work expenses of £10, an £18,000 mortgage, and earnings when at work of £90, £100, £110 and £120 per week.
I regret that I could not justify the cost and work involved in the calculation of net weekly spending power where my hon. Friend's specification of the hypothetical details extends to the complex field of mortgages.
Mortgage Interest (Supplementary Benefit Claimants)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether there is an upper limit on the amount of mortgage interest payable by his Department on behalf of supplementary benefit claimants.
There is no upper limit on the amount of mortgage interest which can be included in the assessment of an owner occupier's supplementary benefit housing requirement. Regulation 21 of the Supplementary Benefit (Requirements) Regulations, as amended, provides for restriction of an amount applicable to housing requirement where this is excessive.
Polluted Bathing Water
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he will now provide additional funds to undertake research into the association between polluted bathing water and damage to health.(2) which contagious diseases can be spread by bathing waters polluted by sewage.
As I indicated in my reply to the hon. Member for Wolverhampton, North-East (Mrs. Short) on 17 July—[Vol. 8, c. 500]—our closely integrated services for the surveillance and investigation of infectious disease have produced no evidence that contagious diseases are being spread in this country by bathing in water contaminated with sewage.As to research, preliminary consideration has shown that there are serious doubts about the feasibility of mounting a meaningful study. Even if it were found to be feasible, such a project would be very expensive, and in view of the minimal health risk I do not consider that the use of scarce research funds would be justified.
Ear, Nose And Throat Service (London)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what consideration he has given to the fact that after September 1981 there will be only one ear, nose and throat surgeon in the City and East London health area, and after April 1981 none at all; and what he proposes to do about it.
On 1 September 1981 the City and East London area health authority (teaching) is expected to have eight consultant ear, nose and throat surgeons in post. However, the hon. Member may also be referring to the Newham health district. The AHA(T) is considering proposals to provide inpatient ear, nose and throat services for this district at St. Bartholomew's and the London hospitals and does not plan therefore to make new permanent consultant appointments for this district. The AHA(T), however, does intend to maintain the existing service until decisions on the new proposals are taken and will, if necessary, make locum appointments.
Personal Information (Computer Storage)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what plans his Department has, or what proposals he is considering, for increasing the amount of personal information stored on computer about claimants and all members of the population with a national insurance number.
The Department seeks to use the most secure, efficient and cost-effective methods—computer or non-computer—for holding any necessary personal information. The taxation of benefits for the unemployed and pilot scheme to enable certain local office benefits to be paid automatically will involve additional computer-held claimant information. The introduction of automated credit transfer will involve holding bank account numbers on computer. It is also hoped to computerise FIS payment records. For longer-term proposals involving the use of computers, I refer the hon. Member to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Somerset, North (Mr. Dean) on 8 December 1980.—[Vol. 995, c. 493–95.]
Health Education Council
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what consultations take place before appointments are made to the Health Education Council;(2) what are the criteria by which members of the Health Education Council are appointed;(3) what are the names of the present members of the Health Education Council, the appointments they hold and the duration of their membership of the council.
Health Education Council members are appointed after consultation with my right hon. and my right hon. and learned Friends the Secretaries of State for Wales, Northern Ireland, and Education and Science, and professional and other organisations representing a wide range of interests including medical, nursing, dental, health education and local government. The criteria for selection are the personal qualities of the candidates and the need for the council to reflect the many professional and other interests that contribute to the development of an effective health education service.The members of the council and the date of their first appointment are as follows:
Name
| Date of first appointment
| |
| Dr. Brian B. Lloyd, MA, Dsc, | Chairman of the Health Education Council | 1 July 1979 |
| Miss J. A. Beak. SRN, SCM, | Chairman of Council of Royal College of Midwives | 1 January 1981 |
| J. C. Cain, Esq, MSc, | Controller, Corporate Affairs BBC | 1 January 1978 |
| I. Davies, Esq, OBE, JP, LLB, | Chairman, Gwynedd Area Health Authority | 1 January 1978 |
| Professor J. A. Davis, MSc, MB, Bs, FRCP, | Professor of Paediatrics, Cambridge University | 1 January 1978 |
| Miss P. B. Dempster, | Deputy Director, Bedford College of Higher Education | 1 January 1981 |
| P. M. England, Esq, Dip, H.Edn, | Area Health Education Officer Humberside AHA | 1 January 1981 |
| Miss S. Goodwin, SRN, NDN Cert, HV Cert, | ||
| FWTCert, | Health Visitor, Ealing, Hammersmith, Hounslow AHA | 1 January 1981 |
| Professor of Child Dental Health University Dental Hospital of | ||
| Professor P. J. Holloway, PhD, BDS, | Manchester | 1 January 1975 |
| Professor W. I. N. Kessel, MD, FRCP, | ||
| FRCPE, FRC Psvch, | Professor of Psychiatry, University of Manchester | 1 January 1979 |
| A. H. Kirkman, Esq, FEHA, | Chief Environmental Health Officer, Poole Borough Council | 1 January 1978 |
| Mrs J. M. Leighton BA, BEd, | Headmistress, Newlands School, Maidenhead | 7 June 1978 |
| Professor of Oncology and Cancer Studies, The Queens | ||
| Professor W. S. Lowry MSc, FRCR, FRCPI, | University, Belfast | 10 September 1976 |
| Community Physician, Oxfordshire Area Health Authority | ||
| DR J. A. Muir Gray, MB, ChB, DPH, | (Teaching) | 1 January 1981 |
| Mrs A. Parker, BA, Dip SA, | Director of Berkshire Social Services Department | 1 January 1981 |
| A. S. D. Service, Esq, | General Secretary, Family Planning Association | 12 August 1976 |
| D. N. Sharpe, Esq, FPS, | President of Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain | 1 January 1981 |
| Dr S. A. Smail, MA, MRCGP, DCH, Dobst, | Senior Lecturer in General Practice at Welsh National School of | |
| RCOG, | Medicine | 1 January 1981 |
| E. A. G. Spanswick, Esq, JP, | General Secretary, Confederation of Health Service Employees | 1 January 1978 |
| K. Tones, Esq, PhD, | Principal Lecturer in Health Education, Leeds Polytechnic | 1 January 1981 |
Supplementary Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many persons currently receive an extra weekly amount for an additional requirement in respect of laundry needs, as allowed for in schedule 3, part II, paragraph 17 of the Supplementary Benefit (Requirements) Regulations 1980.
The most recent information is that on 3 December 1980 about 100,000 such additions were in payment.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) how many persons currently receive an extra weekly amount for an additional requirement in respect of special wear and tear on clothing, as allowed for in schedule 3, part II, paragraph 18 of the Supplementary Benefit (Requirements) Regulations 1980;(2) how many single payments made under the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payment) Regulations 1980 have been made at amounts exceeding the amounts specified in column 2 of schedule 2 of the regulations, as allowed for under the terms of regulation 27(2);(3) how many single payments for clothing and footwear have been made under regulation 27(1) (a) (iv) of the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Regulations 1980; and how many have been made to sick or disabled people; and how many of the latter are receiving benefit at the short-term rate;(4) how many single payments for clothing and footwear have been made under regulation 27(1) (a) (ii) of the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Regulations 1980; how many have been made to sick or disabled people; and how many of the latter are receiving benefit at the short-term rate.
I am unable to provide these items of information.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what measures have been taken to monitor the position of persons who are chronically sick or disabled and who are dependent on supplementary benefit payments.
We have made extensive arrangements to monitor the working of the revised supplementary benefit scheme as it relates to all claimants, commissioning external research and special internal studies to supplement normal management information. Many chronically sick or disabled people are claimants, arid I would expect the results of our monitoring programme to help us to judge how these people, along with other groups of claimants, have fared.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many persons currently receive an extra weekly amount for an additional requirement: in respect of a special diet, as allowed for in schedule 3, part II, paragraph 13 of the Supplementary Benefit (Requirements) Regulations 1980.
The most recent information is that on 3 December 1980 about 365,000 such additions were in payment.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many persons currently receive an extra weekly amount for art additional requirement in respect of heating; how many of these extra payments have been made in accordance with paragraph 1(1) of schedule 3, part I, of the Supplementary Benefit (Requirements) Regulations 1980; and how many have been made in accordance with paragraph 1(2) of schedule 3, how many in accordance with paragraph 1(3) of schedule 3 and how many in accordance with paragraph 6 of part I of schedule 3.
Some of the information is not available in the form requested. On 3 December 1980 the following heating additions were in payment.
Type
| Rate
| Number
|
| Age-related heating addition | 1·40 | 386,000 |
| Other basic rate heating additions | 1·40 | *642,000 |
| Disabled Person's heating addition | 3·40 | †37,000 |
| Other higher rate heating additions | 3·40 | ‡335,000 |
| Central heating addition (1–4 rooms) | 1·40 | 297,000 |
| Central heating addition (5 or more rooms) | 2·80 | 272,000 |
| Other rates | various | 68,000 |
| Total | 2,037,000 | |
Notes:
| ||
*This figure includes additions made under Schedule 3, Part I, paragraphs 1(1) and 2(a). | ||
| †This is the number of additions made under Schedule 3, Part I, paragraph 6. | ||
| ‡This figure includes additions made under Schedule 3, Part I, paragraphs 1(2), 1(3), and 2(b) as well as cases where the criteria in both paragraphs 1(1) and 2(a) are satisfied. | ||
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many single payments have been made under regulation 30 of the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payment) Regulations 1980; how many have been made to sick or disabled people; and how many of the latter are receiving benefit at the short-term rate.
I refer the right hon. Gentleman to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Anglesey (Mr. Best), on 15 July.—[Vol. 8, c. 404.] It is not known how many of these payments have been made to sick or disabled people.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what guidance or instruction is given to benefit officers in order that they may recognise whether a single payment, under regulation 30 of the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Regulations is the only means by which serious damage or serious risk to the health or safety of any member of an assessment unit may be prevented; and what guidance or instruction has been given to chairmen and members of supplementary benefit appeal tribunals.
Guidance to benefit officers on the interpretation of regulation 30 is contained in the Chief Supplementary Benefit Officer's Memorandum or the Single Payments Regulations which has been published and is available in the Library of the House. Copies of the memorandum have also been sent to the chairmen and members of supplementary benefit appeal tribunals.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is his estimate of the additional cost of extending the long-term supplementary benefit rate to all people who are required to sign only quarterly on account of physical or mental handicap following his decision in relation to unemployed people aged 60 years and over announced in his reply to the hon. Member for Barking (Miss Richardson) on 20 July, Official Report, column 34.
I regret that I am unable to supply this information, as it is not possible to identify separately people who are required to sign only quarterly because of physical or mental handicap.
Disabled Persons (Quarterly Attendance)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list the criteria on which disabled people may be offered the facility of quarterly signing by his Department despite the fact that they do not meet the criteria operated by the Department of Employment.
The normal attendance requirements are relaxed or waived to allow certain long-term unemployed claimants and "credits-only" claimants to claim quarterly.So long as a claimant is entitled to unemployment benefit he cannot qualify for quarterly attendance and the facility is therefore offered to persons who fulfil certain conditions and who are not entitled to unemployment benefit but who are getting supplementary allowance. In every case it is confirmed by the Department of Employment with the DHSS area office that on the basis of its records quarterly attendance may be approved.DHSS either on the basis of its own records or because the disablement resettlement officer has so advised may identify a supplementary allowance claimant who does not qualify for quarterly attendance under the normal rules and ask the benefit office to confirm his suitability under modified conditions. These are:
In the case of "credits only" claimants a person handicapped by physical or mental disability must be living in an area where it is known that job opportunities for people with that handicap are very limited, have little prospect of finding suitable work in the near future, have done no work during the preceding 12 months—part-time work of four hours per week or less may be disregarded—and have registered for work for at least nine months during the 12-month period.
Handicapped Persons (Registration)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is his estimate of the proportion of persons who are entitled to register as handicapped under section 29 of the National Assistance Act 1948 who register.
I refer the hon. Member to the survey by the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, "Handicapped and Impaired in Great Britain"—HMSO 1971—and to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Brigg and Scunthorpe (Mr. Brown) on 4 March.—[Vol. 1000, c. 123.]
Regional Structure
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what will be the number of jobs lost in the Department following the proposed changes in the regional structure disclosed to the unions on 16 July; if these losses can be classified on a regional basis; and where the northern regional office will be situated following the implementation of the proposed changes.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Caernarvon (Mr. Wigley) on 23 July—[Vol. 9, c. 226.]—the terms of which apply generally to all the proposed mergers of social security regions.
Health Care (Finance)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what progress he is making with his review of alternative means of financing health care.
My Department is in the process of completing its studies of health care financing in other Western countries, which form the groundwork for consideration of what options there may be to improve health care financing and delivery in this country. In view of the advanced state of this work, I am now able to announce the formation of an interdepartmental working party which will consider, on the basis of these findings, a range of possible proposals for improvement. When this second stage of the review is completed, which I expect to be by the beginning of 1982, I and my colleagues will be in a better position to establish which if any of many possible approaches is likely to be of value here, and to select options for more detailed examination. I shall make a further statement about the progress of the review at that stage.Officials will be assisted in their work by two specialist consultant advisers with experience of the private health sector in this country. The review will be based on the premise that an adequate standard of health care will continue to be provided for all, regardless of means, and will seek to keep the best in the present system while looking for new ways of tackling its weaknesses. Its key objective will be to identify means of improving health standards and giving greater weight to the wishes of the individual consumer but at the same time recognising the need to contain public expenditure and reduce taxation overall.The issues involved are complex and of considerable public interest. There will be full consideration and discussion of any proposals which emerge but I believe that the aim of providing better health care for all the people of this country is one with which everyone will agree.
Rampton Hospital Review Board
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he is able to announce the names of the remaining members of the Rampton Hospital Review Board.
Yes. I am pleased to be able to announce that Mrs. Annette Noskwith JP, of Sandiacre, Nottingham, Mr. George Hemsley of Mapperley, Nottingham and Mr. Wilfred Rawcliffe MBE, JP, of Chorley, Lancs, have accepted my invitation to become
| Common Levy* | MCA† | Total Import Levy | ||||
| Item and CCT No. | £/MT | P/LB | £/MT | P/LB | £/MT | P/LB |
| Common Wheat (10.01A) | 44·921 | 2·04 | 11·381 | 0·52 | 56·302 | 2·56 |
| Barley (10.03) | 33·886 | 1·54 | 10·126 | 0·46 | 44·012 | 2·00 |
| Maize (10.05B) | 33·454 | 1·52 | 10·126 | 0·46 | 43·580 | 1·98 |
| White Sugar (17.01A) | 76·797 | 3·48 | 32·800 | 1·49 | 109·597 | 4·97 |
members of the Rampton Hospital Review Board. These appointments complete my proposals for the board's membership, which will now begin its work.
Mentally Handicapped Persons (Bolton)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what facilities are available for mentally handicapped persons who require secure accommodation in the Bolton area;(2) what plans have been put forward by Brockhall hospital to increase the accommodation there for mentally handicapped persons requiring secure places.
[pursuant to his reply, 27 July 1981, c. 343–44]: Bolton is the catchment area of Brockhall hospital, in Lancashire area health authority, for mental handicap services. Two wards at Brockhall hospital are available for mentally handicapped patients from the Bolton area who are considered unsuitable for care in open wards—a 30-bed female ward which has been upgraded to accept patients requiring secure accommodation and a 35-bed male ward which is, however, insufficiently secure for the most difficult patients. Where a male patient requiring secure accommodation is referred to Brockhall but can not be accepted there, attempts are made to provide suitable accommodation elsewhere in the Lancashire area. Proposals have been put to the Lancashire area health authority to improve facilities on the 35-bed male ward and these will be considered along with other proposals for capital developments.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many mentally handicapped persons from the Bolton area have been offered secure accommodation at Brockhall hospital.
[pursuant to his reply, 27 July 1981, c. 343–44]: In the last 12 months, eight applications were made to Brockhall hospital for the admission of seven patients from the Bolton area. Five were accepted and three refused, in one case because the consultant concerned did not consider Brockhall to be suitable, in the others because hostel accommodation and a work centre place were considered more appropriate.
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
European Community (Payments And Levies)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether he will bring up to date the information on European Economic Community levies, monetary compensatory amounts and United Kingdom net levies supplied to the reply to the hon. Member for Newham, South (Mr. Spearing) Official Report, 21 November 1979, c. 230–2.
The following is the information requested for the United Kingdom as at 25 July 1981:
Common Levy*
| MCA†
| Total Import Levy
| ||||
Item and CCT No.
| £/MT
| P/LB
| £/MT
| P/LB
| £/MT
| P/LB
|
| Butter 82–84 per cent. fatcontent (04.03A)‡ | 874·951 | 39·69 | 206·460 | 9·36 | 1,081·411 | 49·05 |
| Cheddar Cheese (04.04 EIb lbb) | 1,081·812 | 49·07 | 160·070 | 7·26 | 1,241·882 | 56·33 |
| Skimmed Milk (Powder (04.02 AIIb1) | 323·525 | 14·67 | 86·040 | 3·90 | 409·565 | 18·57 |
| Boneless Frozen Beef (02.01 AIIb4bb33) | 1,274·774 | 57·82 | 192·100 | 8·71 | 1,466·874 | 66·53 |
| Lard (15.01 AII) | 40·531 | 1·84 | 25·730 | 1·17 | 66·261 | 3·01 |
| Pigmeat Carcases (02.01 AIIIa1) | 126·575 | 5·74 | 80·420 | 3·65 | 206·995 | 9·39 |
| Salted Bacon Sides (02.06 BIa2aa) | 162·011 | 7·35 | 102·940 | 4·67 | 264·951 | 12·02 |
| Eggs (04.05AIb)§ | 99·554 | 4·52 | 25·850 | 1·17 | 125·404 | 5·69 |
| Poultrymeat 70 per cent. Chickens (02.02 AIb)║ | 107·694 | 4·88 | 22·170 | 1·01 | 129·864 | 5·89 |
Footnotes
| ||||||
* Conversion from European currency units into sterling has been made using the representative rate 1 ECU = £0·618655, and multiplying the resultant figure by the current monetary coefficient of 0·895. | ||||||
| † Currently, monetary compensatory amounts, MCAs, act as a levy on imports. | ||||||
| ‡ There is a special rate for New Zealand butter. | ||||||
| § Includes a supplementary levy applicable to imports from certain countries of origin. Regulations provide for supplementary levies to operate in this sector when average free-at-frontier offer prices fall below the sluice gate price. | ||||||
| ║ Does not include a supplementary levy which at present applies only to imports from Spain. | ||||||
Fertilisers
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the percentage rise in use for all fertilisers in 1980; and what is his Department's estimate of the increased percentage crop yield which accrues from using fertilisers.
Annual estimates of fertiliser use are derived from the survey of fertiliser practice, which covers England and Wales.The latest report produced by Rothamsted experimental station gives results for 1980. The figures shown are percentage changes in fertiliser usage compared with the previous year and those for 1978 and 1979 are included for comparison.
| Type of Fertiliser | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 |
| Per cent. | Per cent. | Per cent. | |
| Nitrogen | +2·7 | +6·1 | +2·5 |
| Phosphate | +5·4 | -2·6 | +2·6 |
| Potash | +5·1 | -2·4 | +2·5 |
| Total | +3·7 | +2·6 | +2·5 |
Sheep
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what has been the total amount paid out to sheep farmers under (a) the European Economic Community scheme and (b) national schemes; what is the current sheep population in the United Kingdom; what it was before the European Economic Community scheme was introduced; what is the division of the sheep population between hill pastures and other pastures in each case; and what was the division of the moneys between hill farmers and others in each case.
In respect of the 1979–80 marketing year United Kingdom sheep fanners received £11 million through the national fat sheep guarantee scheme and £44 million from the 1980 payments of hill livestock compensatory allowances—which are partly funded from Community agricultural guidance funds.The European Community sheepmeat regime was introduced on 20 October 1980. In the 1980–81 marketing year up to that date £33 million was paid to United Kingdom sheep farmers under the FSGS. Payments under the regime of about £48 million in sheep variable premium and about £9 million in sheep annual premium are expected to be made in respect of the period from 20 October 1980 to the end of the 1980–81 marketing year. The 1981 payments of hill livestock compensatory allowances on sheep totalled £50 million.The December census figures for the United Kingdom total sheep population were 21,721,000 in 1979 and 21,722,000 in 1980. Hill livestock compensatory allowances are paid only to hill farmers in the less-favoured areas designated under the terms of European Community directive 75/268. It is not possible to divide the other figures given between hill farmers and others.
Currencies (Green Value)
asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food by what percentage the green value of each currency varies from the unit of account used in determining the common price under the common agricultural policy.
The percentage differences between the green rate for each currency and its central rate or as appropriate, its average market rate during the reference period 22 to 28 July, are shown below, together with the resulting monetary compensatory amounts applicable from 3 August.
| Percentage difference | Applied MCA percentage | |
| United Kingdom | +10·4 | +9·4 |
| Germany | +4·2 | +3·2 |
| Percentage difference | Applied MCA percentage | |
| Italy | -2·1 | +1·0 |
| Greece | -0·2 | 0 |
| Others | 0 | 0 |
Defence
Aldermaston (Laser)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the generating capacity in watts of the laser at Aldermaston used in nuclear holocaust simulation experiments.
The high power laser—HELEN—at Aldermaston is not used in "nuclear holocaust simulation" experiments but in high temperature physics experiments relevant to nuclear weapon design. The laser is capable of a maximum output of 2 terawatts, but is currently operating at 1 terawatt. The duration of the pulse is less than one thousand-millionth of a second.
Radioactive Material (Transportation)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the accidents involving the transportation of radioactive material to and from and within the United Kingdom in the past year.
There have been no accidents involving radioactive materials being transported to, from or within the United Kingdom for defence purposes during the past year. Questions about the movement of other radioactive materials by rail or road are a matter for the Secretary of State for Transport and by sea and air for the Secretary of State for Trade.
Unused Service Camps
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish a list of Ministry of Defence camps at present not being used, indicating the total accommodation in each.
Ministry of Defence camps currently not being used, but available for occupation are listed below with their rank and file capacity.
| Number | |
| Kiwi Barracks, Bulford, Wiltshire | 330 |
| Gaza/Jaffa Barracks, Catterick, Yorks | 540 |
| Old Sarum Camp, near Salisbury, Wilts | 120 |
| Lucknow Barracks, Tidworth, Wilts | 460 |
| Mooltan Barracks, Tidworth, Wilts | 540 |
| Thorney Island, West Sussex | 900 |
| Ty-Croes Camp, Anglesey | 400 |
Regular Army Reservists (Pay)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence why Regular Army Reservists are not paid the Army rates of pay which are paid to members of the Territorial Army.
It would be inappropriate to do so as their peacetime liability is quite different from that of members of: he Territorial Army. Regular Army Reservists are at present required to report one day a year under the individual reinforcement plan. They receive a reporting grant which replaced the previous systems of Regular Reservists pay. The training liability of members of the Territorial Army is more extensive and their remuneration reflects this. Details were set out in my answer to the hon. Member on 21 July.—[Vol. 9, c. 96–97.]
Northern Ireland (Terrorist Attacks)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence on how many occasions in the past year the Ulster Defence Regiment in Northern Ireland has been fired at by terrorists; on how many occasions it returned fire; and how many terrorists were killed or injured as a result.
In the year 1 July 1980 to 30 June 1981 members of the UDR have been fired at on 28 occasions. They have returned fire four times. One terrorist is thought to have been wounded, but escaped.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence on how many occasions in the past year the Army in Northern Ireland has been fired on by terrorists; on how many occasions it returned fire; and how many terrorists were killed or injured as a result.
In the year 1 July 1980 to 30 June 1%1 members of the Regular Army in Northern Ireland have been fired at on 166 occasions. They have returned fire on 51 occasions. Two terrorists have been killed, and four wounded in exchanges of fire. In addition there is evidence of further, but uncomfirmed, terrorist casualties caused by the Army in such exchanges.
Ulster Defence Regiment
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many members of the Ulster Defence Regiment have been killed or injured on duty; and how many have been killed or injured off duty since the formation of the regiment.
24 members of the Ulster Defence Regiment have been killed on duty and 90 whilst off duly since the formation of the regiment. 232 soldiers from the regiment have been injured by terrorist action: 126 of there on duty and 106 off.
Ulster Defence Regiment And British Army (Northern Ireland Placement)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many members of the Army and the Ulster Defence Regiment serve in each of the six counties in Northern Ireland: and how many serve in Belfast.
Of the six resident major units of the Regular Army in Northern Ireland, two are based near Belfast—at Aldergrove, Co. Antrim and Holywood, Co. Down; two are based in Co. Londonderry—one in Londonderry itself and the other at Ballykelly—and one each in Co Tyrone—Omagh—and Co. Down—Ballykinler. The three roulement major units are based, one in Belfast, one in Co. Armagh and the third partly in Co. Fermanagh and partly in Co. Tyrone. The Maze Prison Guard Force is, of course, in Co. Antrim. The supporting elements of the Regular Army are located with these units and elsewhere in the Province.
The eleven battalions of the UDR are based throughout the Province—two in Belfast and nine outside.
The exact number of soldiers serving in any single part of the Province varies constantly, depending upon the RUC's requirement for military support.
National Finance
Financial Targets
2.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will report progress towards achieving the financial targets in the medium term financial strategy; and if he will make a statement.
Although the present monetary position is distorted by the effects of the Civil Service strike, we estimate that underlying monetary growth is within the 6 to 10 per cent. target range. We are therefore on course towards achieving the progressive deceleration in rates of monetary growth outlined in the medium term financial strategy.
Economy
3.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will make a statement about the state of the economy.
I am much encouraged by the success in reducing inflation, and the indications that productivity is increasing. These are the foundations of sustainable recovery.
Government Departments (Insurance)
12.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he has given any consideration to introducing insurance for damage, destruction and fire risk to Government Departments.
This is considered from time to time, but I see no need for a change of policy. The risks are widely spread and the cost of insuring the whole range of physical assets of Government Departments would exceed the likely benefits.
Economic Policies
16.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he is satisfied with the current effects of Her Majesty's Government's economic policies.
The conditions for sustainable recovery are being established and will be of lasting benefit to the economy.
Unemployment
17.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the estimated total annual cost to the Exchequer of the current level of unemployment.
Estimates of the Exchequer cost of a 100,000 change in the level of unemployment in the private sector were published in the February edition of the economic progress report. As explained in that article, it would be totally misleading to gross up these estimates to give a figure for the total cost of the current level of unemployment.
Exchange Rate
18.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his policy over the control of the exchange rate.
The Government's policy continues to be to allow the exchange rate to be determined primarily by market forces. Whether the rate is rising or falling, intervention by the authorities is limited to smoothing to moderate excessive fluctuations and preserve orderly markets.
Interest Rates
19.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the present level of interest rates.
Both short and long-term interest rates have risen in the last month. But there have been some signs of easing this week and United Kingdom rates remain lower than those prevailing in the economies of many of our principal competitors. The House will recall that my Budget speech foreshadowed a number of changes in our system of monetary control, the principal objective being to allow the market a greater role in determining the structure of short-term interest rates. Recent developments have begun to show the way in which these arrangements will operate in practice. I expect the full system to come into operation on 20 August, the first day of banking September.
Public Sector Borrowing Requirement
20.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he is satisfied that the current Treasury projections confirming a rise in the public sector borrowing requirement for 1982–83 are in line with his current strategy.
Treasury projections were published in the Financial Statement and Budget Report. They show, on the assumptions used in the PSBR, a fall in the public sector borrowing requirement from 4¼ per cent. of GDP this year to 3¼ per cent. in 1982–83, which is in line with the Government's strategy of achieving declining monetary growth at acceptable interest rates.
Inflation
21.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what further steps he is taking to reduce the level of inflation; and if he will make a statement.
23.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what further proposals he has to reduce the rate of inflation.
I am confident that the policies we are already pursuing are those best directed to further reducing the level of inflation.
£ Sterling
22.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the movement of the £ sterling against the United States dollar and the basket of currencies, respectively, since 1 January.
Since 2 January, the £ sterling has fallen by around 22 per cent. against the dollar and by around 10 per cent. in effective terms.
Ottawa Economic Summit
24.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the implications of the Ottawa economic summit for the economy.
The Prime Minister's 23 July statement on the Ottawa economic summit, and the Ottawa declaration itself, show that there is an international consensus embracing the economic objectives and policies being implemented in the United Kingdom. In particular, it is clearly recognised that it is necessary to defeat inflation if unemployment is to be reduced and that this requires control of monetary aggregates and of budgetary deficits. The declaration foresaw the prospect of moderate economic growth in the coming year.
Agricultural Premises (Rating)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the Government's policy in respect of the rating of agricultural premises used for the purposes of farm gate sales of agricultural produce and of preparation and storage of produce for such sale; and in what ways, if any, this policy has been reviewed or revised since May 1979 in the form of any instructions to the Inland Revenue valuation departments.
Retail marketing is not an "agricultural operation" for the purposes of the General Rate Act 1967 or the Rating Act 1971. Farm shops and premises used for the preparation and storage of produce for sale in such shops have always been liable to rates. There has, however, been some doubt about premises situated on art exempt agricultural holding used for the retail sale of produce exclusively from that holding, and such premises have not been assessed unless the goods sold had been treated or prepared for sale in more than a minor degree. The law has, however, been clarified by the decision in Corser (VO) v. Gloucestershire Marketing Society (Court of Appeal, 1980) and valuation officers have been advised that prima facie all such premises are rateable.
Cash Mileage Allowances (Judgment)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the current attitude of the Inland Revenue to the apportionment of road tax and insurance where a cash mileage allowance is paid to an employee to use his own car on business, in the light of the judgment in Perrons v Sparkman.
The Inland Revenue has always accepted that when a car is used partly for business and partly for private purposes all the overhead expenses incurred by an employee, including Vehicle Excise Duty and insurance, may be apportioned on a mileage basis between the two uses and that part attributed to business use allowed as a deduction in computing the employee's taxable income regardless of whether or not the employee is paid a mileage allowance. It has no plans to change this approach.
Family Benefit
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the net cost per £1 of introducing (a) a taxable benefit for families including a child aged under 5 years assuming a system of mandatory independent taxation and (b) a tax-free benefit for families including a child aged under 5 years.
At 1981–82 income levels the net cost of such benefits would be approximately:
National Insurance Contributions
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will specify those categories where class I employers' secondary national insurance contributions, being money not wholly and exclusively laid out or expended for the purposes of trade, profession or vocation, are not lax deductible; and to what percentage of the total work force this applies.
Secondary class I national insurance contributions paid by an employer in respect of a non-business employee—eg. a housekeeper or similar domestic help—do not qualify for tax relief. I understand that this group represents approximately 0·5 per cent. of the total work force.
Taxation And Social Security Contributions (International Comparisons)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will provide information on the percentage contribution made to the gross national product at factor cost in each EEC country by taxation and social security contributions.
The latest available estimates of taxes and social security contributions as a percentage of the gross national product at factor cost for the member countries of the European Community are given in the following table:
| 1978 | Percentage |
| Belgium | 47·4 |
| Denmark | N. A. |
| France | 43·6 |
| German Federal Republic | 44·6 |
| Greece | *30·8 |
| Irish Republic | *39·7 |
| Italy | 36·2 |
| Luxembourg | *41·8 |
| Netherlands | 52·3 |
| United Kingdom | 39·1 |
| * Figures relate to 1977. | |
Economic Trends.
Members Of Parliament (Travel Costs)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what are the reasons for the difference in treatment for tax purposes of (a) hon. Members in respect of travel warrants for rail travel between their homes and Westminster when their home is neither in their constituency nor on the route between the constituency and Westminster and (b) of Members of the House of Lords in respect of travel from home to Westminster.
Members of Parliament, as paid office holders receiving reimbursement of the cost of travelling between their homes—other than in their constituency—and Westminster, are taxable on these reimbursed expenses as emoluments in the same way as any holder of a paid office or employment receiving such payments. Members of the House of Lords, like other holders of unpaid offices, are not taxable on the reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the duties of their office.
Member's Correspondence
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when a full reply will be sent to the letter dated 11 May and addressed to the Minister of State, the hon. and learned Member for Dover and Deal (Mr. Rees) by the hon. Member for Goole about clause 34 of the Finance Bill.
I have sent a reply to the hon. Member today.
Graduated Pensions (Taxation)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether a graduated pension paid in arrears for preceding years, either in error or because of failure to claim, is taxed as for the year it was due, or for the year it is paid.
National Insurance retirement pension paid in arrears is taxable by reference to the tax year in which it is due.
Manufacturing Wages And Salaries
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the total increase in manufacturing wages and salaries per unit of output in the United Kingdom since June 1979; and whether he will give comparable figures for France, West Germany and Japan over the same period.
Unit wage and salary costs in United Kingdom manufacturing rose by 32 per cent. between June 1979 and March this year compared with 9 per cent. for West Germany and 3 per cent. for Japan. The latest figure for France relates to the fourth quarter of 1980 and shows an increase of 21 per cent. since the second quarter of 1979.
Income Tax
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many persons paid income tax in 1980–81; and what proportion of these was over pension age.
About 25½ million people paid income tax in 1980–81—counting husband and wife separately, if they each had income subject to tax.A breakdown of income tax payers by age is not available. However, tax records do distinguish single people who are 65 or over and married couples with at least one partner who is 65 or over; it is also possible to distinguish single women—but not widows or married women—aged 60 to 64 who have a retirement pension. Amongst these groups, there were about 3 million people paying tax in 1980–81.
North Sea Resources (Exploitation)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his latest estimate of the real increase in tax and other revenues accruing to the Government for the exploitation of North Sea resources for each of the financial years 1981–82 to 1985–86.
The latest available forecasts of total Government revenues from North Sea oil and gas production are those in the Treasury's March 1981 economic progress report. These are:
| Constant (1979–80 prices) £ billion | ||
| Forecast revenues | Increase over 1980/81 | |
| 1980–81 | 3¼ | — |
| 1981–82 | 4½ | ¾ |
| 1982–83 | 4¾ | 1½ |
| 1983–84 | 5¼ | 2 |
Review Of Functioning Of Financial Institutions
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when the Government will be publishing a formal reply to the recommendations of the committee chaired by the right hon. Member for Huyton. (Sir H. Wilson).
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Isle Of Man And Channel Islands
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will state for each of the last 10 years the per capita expenditure in the United Kingdom on defence and foreign relations; and what the figures would be for (a) the Isle of Man and (b) the Channel Isles on the basis of expenditure at the same per capita level.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Foreign Student (Value Added Tax)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will consider exempting foreign students at English language schools from having to pay value added tax on their tuition fees.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
National Savings Certificates
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he has any plans to extend the age eligibility of second index-linked national savings certificates.
Yes. From 7 September there will be no age restriction at all. In addition, trustees, registered friendly societies and eligible charitable and other bodies will also be able to hold second index-linked national savings certificates. At the same time, the Government have increased their target for net inflows into national savings in the current financial year from £3 billion to £3½ billion.
European Community (Subsidies And Grants)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the European movements in the United Kingdom which obtain subsidies or specific grants from the EEC under chapter 2.9 of the Community budget, and if he will detail the amounts they received in the most recent annual period for which figures are available.
[pursuant to his reply, 20 July 1981, c. 42]: The provision included in chapter 29 of the 1981 Community budget, which covers expenditure throughout the Community, amounts to 2,679,800 Ecus—about £1,686,576 at the rate of exchange used for 1981 budget estimates of £1 = 1·5889 Ecus. Administration of this fund is the responsibility of the Commission and the details required by my hon. Friend are not available to Her Majesty's Government. Like all other Community expenditure it is subject to audit by the Court of Auditors whose report on the annual accounts of the Community is deposited in the Library.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the European movements in the United Kingdom which receive payments from the European Economic Community Commission for research, promotional or advisory activities, and if he will detail the amounts they received in the most recent annual period for which figures are available.
[pursuant to his reply, 20 July 1981, c. 42]: Provision is included in article 291 of the 1981 Community budget to meet expenditure on subsidies to European movements throughout the Community. The amount included for this purpose in the 1981 Community budget is 207,000 Ecus—about £130,279 at the rate of exchange used for 1981 Budget estimates of £1–1·5889 Ecus. The administration of these funds is the responsibility of the Commission and the details required by my hon. Friend are not available to Her Majesty's Government. Like all other Community expenditure it is subject to audit by the Court of Auditors whose report on the annual accounts of the Community is deposited in the Library.
European Community Budget
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what was the United Kingdom's gross contribution in £ sterling and in European currency units to the European Economic Community budget for each European Economic Community budget year, 1980 and 1981, what were the United Kingdom's receipts or current estimates of receipts for 1980 and 1981, and what therefore was the United Kingdom's net contribution in each year.
[pursuant to his reply, 23 July 1981, c. 192]: Estimates for the European Community budget for 1981, expressed both in European currency units and sterling, were published in table II of the statement on the 1981 Community budget (Cmnd. 8187) as follows:
| Million Ecus | £ million | |
| United Kingdom gross contribution | 3984·3 | 2507·5 |
| United Kingdom total receipts | 3076·6 | 1936·2 |
| United Kingdom net contribution | 907·7 | 571·3 |
45]. It would not be realistic to try to convert these figures to European units of account as they are the actual payments and receipts in sterling and would need to be converted at the actual sterling-Eua rates ruling at the time of each payment-receipt. The figures for receipts in both 1980 and 1981 include refunds payable under the 30 May 1980 agreement. These refunds are, however, paid in arrears and are, therefore, not wholly shown against the year to which they relate.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if, having regard to the fact that the Federal Republic of Germany's gross domestic product is twice that of the United Kingdom and that France's gross domestic product is 50 per cent higher, he will explain the reasons why Germany's value added tax contribution to the European Economic Community budget is only 23 per cent. larger than that of the United Kingdom and that of France is 9 per cent. greater.
[pursuant to his reply, 23 July 1981, c. 192]: The difference between the various gross domestic products is not as great as my hon. Friend suggests. The figures vary from year to year; at present exchange rates, German GDP exceeds that of the United Kingdom by about a half and France's GDP does so by about one-fifth. The VAT contributions to the Community's finances are derived from the member States' shares in the harmonised VAT base. This is closely related to consumer expenditure and the ratio of consumer expenditure to GDP is not the same in each member country, so that there is unlikely to be a close fit between GDP shares and VAT shares in any particular year. The VAT shares are also sharply affected by changes in the exchange rates used in the calculations. For example, in the 1981 draft amending budget just established by the budget Council, the German VAT base is estimated at 69 per cent. greater than that of the United Kingdom; whereas in the 1982 draft Budget it is estimated as only 24 per cent. greater. The corresponding percentages for the French VAT base were 33 per cent. greater and 9 per cent. greater respectively.
Public Corporations (Privatisation)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list those public companies which have been formed since May 1979 out of assets previously owned by public: corporations; and if he will list in each case the percentage of their shares held by the Government and their agencies.
[pursuant to his reply, 24 July 1981]: Three Companies Act companies which are, or may become, public companies have been formed. These are British Aerospace Limited, the National Freight Company Limited and Gleneagles Hotels Limited. British Aerospace Limited was formed as a public company on 1 January of this year and a 52 per cent. shareholding was sold on 13 February leaving a 48 per cent. Government shareholding. The National Freight Company became a Companies Act company on 1 October 1980. The Government currently own 100 per cent. of the shareholding in the company, but are at present considering an offer for the shares from a management-led consortium. Gleneagles Hotels Limited was formed as a public company on 22 June 1980. One third of the shares are owned by British Rail, the remainder being held by a range of private sector investors. British Rail has also established a new wholly owned subsidiary, British Rail Investments Limited, which will be handling the introduction of private capital into others of its subsidiaries.
Corporation Tax
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the estimated annual cost to the Exchequer of introducing a graduated scheme of corporation tax, without marginal rate penalty, for all unquoted United Kingdom resident trading companies on the basis of the bands of taxable profits and reduced rates of tax set out in the proposed new clause 22 to the Finance Bill.
[pursuant to his reply, 27 July 1981]: It is not possible to estimate the eventual cost for companies which might qualify. The direct cost if the proposal applied to all companies would be about £400 million. There would also be consequential costs which it has not been possible to estimate.
Manufacturing Industry
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer why he believes that the manufacturing sector is more important to the health of the economy than the service sector.
[pursuant to his reply, 27 July 1981]: We consider both the manufacturing sector and the services sector make an important contribution to the health of the economy. If in asking this question my hon. Friend had a particular point to raise, perhaps he would like to write to me.
Pay-As-You-Earn Tax (Unrecovered Debt)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much pay-as-you-earn income tax was written off as an unrecovered debt in the accounting year ending 31 October 1980.
[pursuant to his reply, 28 July 1981]: The total amount of pay-as-you-earn income tax remitted or written off as irrecoverable in the year ending 31 October 1980 is estimated at £11·9 million.
National Insurance Charges
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the amount collected in national health insurance charges and surcharges from employers and employed, respectively, in the last financial year.
I have been asked to reply.
The national health and national insurance surcharge elements of the national insurance contribution in 1980–81 are estimated to be £1,034 million and £3,477 million respectively of which £4,084 million was contributed by employers.
Education And Science
Engineering Education
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will make a statement about engineering education.
Following the Finniston report, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Industry has been taking the lead in discussions about a proposed new Engineering Council while my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Employment has been considering with the Manpower Services Commission certain training implications. I have been examining in consultation with my right hon. Friends the Secretaries of State for Scotland and Wales the educational questions and those related to post graduate training for intending professional engineers.The Finniston report was a landmark in this vital area of national life. Many recommendations affected education and I therefore arranged for the national conference on engineering education and training—NCEET—to consider and report on these issues. I am most grateful to Mr. Dick Morris, who chaired the steering committee of the national conference, and to all those involved in making it a success and in producing its very clear and compelling report.The questions raised in this debate require consideration and action at different levels in the education system: by engineering departments in institutions of higher and further education, by the institutions themselves—the universities, polytechnics, Scottish central institutions, and other colleges of higher and further education—by examining and validating bodies, by the University Grants Committee, and by the local education authorities. The role of the Government is not to dictate the response of the education system and its component parts, but to give a clear lead by their own approach.At the same time, the message of the Finniston report, strongly endorsed by the national conference, was that the formation of engineers cannot be a matter for the education system and the profession alone. Industry must be brought into active partnership in designing courses to meet its own requirements and in co-operating with educational establishments in the conduct of courses, especially those parts of them concerned with giving students practical experience. It was, above all, to make a reality of that partnership that Finniston proposed the creation of a new body responsible for registration of engineers and the accreditation of their professional formation.My hon. Friend the Under-Secretary for Industry is today making an announcement about the proposed establishment of an Engineering Council by Royal charter. This council would have a very important role in promoting developments in engineering studies in the directions proposed by Finniston and the national conference. It is clear that the education system stands ready and willing to extend a welcome to an Engineering Council, and will collaborate fully with it in the accreditation of courses.
As in all other areas, the Government approach these issues with the determination to improve our national economic health within the limits of what we can afford. One of the main messages to come out of the responses to the Finniston report and the discussion at the NCEET is the need to improve quality rather than to increase quantity. The education service must therefore concentrate its efforts building on existing strengths and developing new strengths to match changing needs. Engineering education of high quality must be available throughout the country for potential engineers of all kinds—professional engineers, technician engineers and technicians.
The NCEET recognised that the quality of engineering education depends crucially on what the schools can do to arouse the interest and ambitions of pupils, and to equip them with a broad range of knowledge and skills. The Secretary of State for Wales and I are seeking to promote this important function of the schools by the action we are taking in relation to the school curriculum, and we are also encouraging closer collaboration between schools and industry through such bodies as the science and technology regional organisations. In Scotland, my right hon. Friend is taking similar action. In a statement on the Munn and Dunning reports, which he made in the House on 31 March 1980, he said that the Government considered it essential that all pupils in the last two years of compulsory education should study mathematics and science. On schools-industry liaison, he welcomed the increasing effectiveness of activities at local level involving schools, industry and voluntary bodies.
In the professional preparation of engineers, the main question for the education system is the broad pattern of future engineering degree courses. Finniston proposed two streams at degree level leading to a bachelor of engineering—BEng—degree for the main body of engineers after three years and the master of engineering—MEng—degree for the future leaders of the profession after four. Both streams would incorporate important elements of what Finniston called engineering applications.
Our consultations have revealed strong support for the inclusion in engineering degree courses of a greater element of engineering practice, but little for the precise BEng-MEng split. The NCEET report endorsed the principle of enhancement, but favoured a range of first degree courses, full-time and sandwich, varying in theoretical and practical content according to the needs of the sectors of industry which they serve. The majority of first degree courses would be of the same length as at present, but the range would include a small number of extended courses. The NCEET saw the MEng as a one-year postgraduate course for the high fliers with the potential to lead technically oriented businesses. The report also proposed that consideration should be given to the introduction of a distinctive practically-oriented stream for technician engineers leading to the award of bachelor of technology—BTech.
The Government generally favour the approach of the NCEET which may be seen as a development of Finniston's proposals, permitting greater flexibility. Some existing courses, particularly sandwich courses, already give an emphasis to the application of engineering principles. Sandwich courses are threatened, however, by the shortage of suitable industrial placements for students, and the education departments and the MSC are currently studying the implications and ways of overcoming this difficulty. We endorse the NCEET' s proposal that ad engineering departments should review their courses, both internally and with industry and the profession, against the objective of a greater emphasis on applications, while bearing in mind the different needs of the various branches of engineering, and their students' interests and abilities. We hope that the proposed Engineering Council would have particularly in mind this objective in accrediting first degree courses, but we also hope that its accreditation arrangements would be flexible, and that it would co-operate with validating bodies, such as the CNAA. An important consideration is maintaining and, where necessary, improving opportunities for those who wish or need to obtain or enhance their qualifications through part-time study. We look to all responsible for the management and financing of higher education institutions to respond constructively so far as resources allow to proposals for the enhancement of engineering degree courses. We look to them also, in collaboration with the new Engineering Council, to develop a consistent and co-ordinated approach across the whole higher education system.
Particular attention has been paid by commentators to the question of the length of engineering degree courses and the problem of encompassing within them a wider range of engineering knowledge. There are already precedents, not only in Scotland, for courses taking four years. The Government recognise that a number of further courses will contain essential material making a longer duration than three years necessary. Such courses should be clearly distinctive in terms of staff and student quality and should be of demonstrable value to industry. The Government's view is that their numbers should be limited, and that normal engineering education should continue to take the form of three-year bachelor courses—or of sandwich courses—followed by structured training and experience. In the present financial climate there can, in any case, be no question of the Government providing extra resources to extend engineering degree courses. The enhancement and extension of courses will have to accomplished within the funds available; and institutions and those who fund them must weigh the cost of raising quality against the number they wish to accept on their courses. The Government have been glad to note the University Grants Committee's statement that numbers in the universities in engineering and technology should increase slightly over the next three years and that, within total numbers, universities should decide the extent to which the lengthening of courses can be justified.
The Government endorse the importance attached by both Finniston and the NCEET to the structured two-year training period after graduation as part of an engineer's basic formation. Industry will have to be prepared to increase its training places if sufficient provision is to be achieved.
The Government also endorse fully the emphasis in the Finniston and NCEET reports on the continuing formation of engineers as the most effective way of raising the general level of competence in the engineering profession. The development of professional skill and knowledge must continue beyond registration, and demands a provision for integrated education and training to match the needs of industry. Educational institutions and employers must be partners in the design of such provision.
My Department has recognised the need for the expansion of relevant continuing education at all levels and is actively pursuing the programme of action outlined in its document on post-experience vocational education published last October. But we consider that Finniston was right in saying that the main impetus must come from the engineers and their employers, who together must pursue the essential integration of employment, education and training. We agree with the NCEET report that the promotion of that integration, and of continuing formation, should be a vital role for the proposed Engineering Council.
Continuing formation may or may not lead to higher degree qualifications, but these principles should apply to the future development of such qualifications. Proposals for the development of M.Eng courses and for the future of M.Sc courses should be evolved to a great extent in partnership between employers and educational institutions, as the NCEET recommended. We support particularly the emphasis on planning postgraduate courses of all kinds in modular form to make it easier for more practising engineers, including those at senior levels, to undertake them.
As both Finniston and the NCEET fully recognised, there is a need for an effective and expert corps of technician engineers and technicians to support professional engineers, and the proposed Engineering Council would maintain a register which recognised all three levels of qualification. The Government have welcomed the MSC's consultative document on the Open Tech. They agree with the NCEET report that qualifications in this area should continue to be the responsibility of the Technician Education Council and the Scottish Technical Education Council, and that the TEC and SCOTEC higher diplomas should be developed and accepted as the principal replacements for the existing higher national diplomas.
I have mentioned the NCEET's proposal for a new practically-oriented degree, the B.Tech. This was seen as a full degree course but corresponding to the technician engineer level of employment. Views at the conference differed widely on this issue, and the NCEET report's recommendation acknowledges the need for further consideration. One thing is clear, and this is that there is a significant demand for additional high quality technician engineers in a number of sectors of engineering. There are, however, different views about the need for such a special qualification: its precise nature; its relevance to the needs of employers; even its title. It would be premature for the Government to take a view on a proposition as yet incompletely defined. We urge the universities, polytechnics and validating bodies to give this matter careful consideration in consultation with the proposed Engineering Council.
A statement even of this length cannot cover in detail all the recommendations of the Finniston and NCEET reports. Its objective is to indicate the general approach which the Government will adopt in promoting the further development of engineering education and training.
Scottish Universities (Student Costs)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what has been the expenditure per student at each Scottish university in each of the past three years.
The figures are as follows:
| Average gross recurrent cost per full-time equivalent student at Scottish universities | |||
| £ November 1980 prices | |||
| 1977–78 | 1978–79 | 1979–80* | |
| Aberdeen | 4,250 | 4,350 | 4,400 |
| Dundee | 4,750 | 5,025 | 5,500 |
| Edinburgh | 3,925 | 3,950 | 4,225 |
| Glasgow | 3,800 | 4,200 | 4,225 |
| Heriot Watt | 3,500 | 3,800 | 3,950 |
| St. Andrews | 3,375 | 3,800 | 3,825 |
| Stirling | 3,400 | 3,475 | 3,600 |
| Strathclyde | 3,425 | 3,675 | 3,625 |
| * Provisional. | |||
Universities (Grants)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what was the total amount spent in 1980–81 on grants to universities (a) from the University Grants Committee and (b) from local authorities for fees and so on; how much was spent on grants from local authorities to students for maintenance; and what he expects the comparable figure to be for 1983–84.
Recurrent and capital grants to universities totalled £1,040 million in the financial year 1980–81. Information on payment of fees and maintenance by local authorities in that year is not yet available. As indicated in Cnmd. 8175, the detailed implications of the Government's expenditure plans for the university and non-university sectors are under discussion with the University Grants Committee and local authority associations and the exact apportionment of the total resources available in 1983–84 has yet to be settled.
Young Persons
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science many young people will have reached and will reach the age of 18 years in each of the 10 years commencing 1978.
The following information, published in "Population Projections 1979–2019", page 2, No. 11—Her Majesty's Stationery Office—related to 18-year-olds in England and Wales as at mid-years.
| (000's) | |
| 1978 | 745 |
| 1979 | 776 |
| 1980 | 795 |
| 1981 | 813 |
| 1982 | 832 |
| 1983 | 832 |
| 1984 | 813 |
| 1985 | 811 |
| 1986 | 782 |
| 1987 | 787 |
University Grants Committee
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what representations he has received from the hon. Member for Eccles on behalf of constituents, members of universities and others regarding the allocation of grants by the University Grants Committee; and if he will publish his considered reply on this matter.
My right hon. and learned Friend has received 15 letters from the hon. Member for Eccles (Mr. Carter-Jones) about the allocation of grants by the University Grants Committee. In view of the total volume of correspondence on this subject, it may be some time before he receives any reply. The Government's policy on the financing of the universities was explained in the debate on 8 July and my right hon. and learned Friend does not intend to publish replies to individual letters from hon. Members in the Official Report.
Universities (Statistics)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what was the average percentage rise in applications to universities in Great Britain in 1981–82 as compared with 1980–81; and what was the percentage rise in applications to the university of Keele in the same period.
Total applications by home and overseas candidates received by 31 March 1981 were 1 per cent. down over the same period in 1980. Applications by home candidates showed an increase of 4 per cent. These figures relate to applications made through the universities central council on admissions for undergraduate level courses in the United Kingdom universities and exclude some applications which are made direct to the university concerned. The council does not make available figures for applications to individual universities.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what percentage of undergraduates nationally are women; and what percentage of undergraduates at the university of Keele are women.
In 1979–80, 38 per cent. of full-time and sandwich undergraduates in the universities of Great Britain were women. At the university of Keele the figure was 45 per cent.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what percentage of undergraduates nationally are mature; and what percentage of undergraduates at the university of Keele are mature.
For the purposes of higher education planning, mature undergraduate students are defined to be those aged 21 or over on entry to their course. In 1979–80, 16 per cent. of full-time and sandwich new entrants to undergraduate courses in the universities of Great Britain were aged 21 and over. At the university of Keele the figure was 19 per cent.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science which universities have an electronics and recording studio equipped for computer syntheses.
I shall write to the hon. Member with the information that she requests.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science which universities offer courses enabling undergraduate students to transfer to degree courses in chemistry, mathematics, physics and Russian.
Keele university offers transfer sessional courses to students who wish to take a science, a language or music as a principal subject in their degree and who have not obtained an A-level qualification.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science which universities offer a four-year course, the first year of which is devoted to general studies.
The university of Keele offers just such a course and the university of Sussex offers a four-year course with a two-term preliminary arts or science course during the student's first year.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science in which universities a science course is an obligatory part of first degrees.
Undergraduates at Keele university, whatever their course, must at a minimum study one science subject at subsidiary level for one year.
Russian And Electronics (Joint Degree)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list the universities in England and Scotland where undergraduates can read for a joint degree in Russian and electronics.
Yes. The university Keele.
University Of Keele
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what percentage of students at the university of Keele graduate in two or more principal subjects.
In the year ended December 1979, about 90 per cent. of the first degrees awarded by the university of Keele involved a combination of any subjects.
Handicapped Pupils
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what steps the Government are taking to draw attention to the current Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development project on the education of the handicapped adolescent; and if he will make a statement.
British experts are participating in a number of international conferences and seminars which form part of the second phase of this project, and the Government are joint sponsors with OECD of a conference on the handicapped adolescent to be held in Cardiff this September. The conference will be hosted by the South Glamorgan county council and my noble Friend the Minister of State, Department of Education and Science and my hon. Friend the Under-Secretary of State for Wales, the Member for Cardiff, North-West (Mr. Roberts) have agreed to speak. Participants have been invited from a wide range of public authorities, voluntary bodies and others interested in the subject.
Northern Ireland
Departmental Organisation
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland whether he will make a further statement about his proposals for departmental organisation in Northern Ireland.
In my reply to a question by the hon. Member on 19 March I announced that I was proposing to merge the control functions of the Northern Ireland Departments of Finance and of the Civil Service and was examining how this merger would be put into effect.I now propose to set up a Department of Finance and Personnel. This would be responsible for resource planning for the whole range of my functions in Northern Ireland, for control of both money and manpower in respect of the Northern Ireland Departments, and also for all the other general personnel matters at present the responsibility of the Department of the Civil Service. This means that it would compromise all the functions—and staff—of that Department and the financial planning, control and economic and social research divisions of the existing Department of Finance. Most of the divisions concerned with the miscellaneous functions of the existing Department of Finance would be transferred to other Departments. Principal among these are works division, ordnance survey, rating division, the Land Registry and Registry of Deeds which would be transferred to the Department of the Environment (NI); the Public Record Office to the Department of Education; and the General Register Office and miscellaneous licensing functions to the Department of Health and Social Services. The valuation office, Ulster savings, the office of law reform and charities branch which are at present the responsibility of the Department of Finance would be included in the Department of Finance and Personnel. The staff organisations have been informed of these proposals.I will in due course be publishing a proposal for an Order in Council constituting the Department of Finance and Personnel and carrying through the transfer of functions with the aim that the changes should become effective on 1 April 1982.I am satisfied in the light of the review of social affairs that no major departmental reorganisation is required, but I propose to improve the existing machinery of coordination between the Departments with responsibility in the field of social affairs to ensure the development of more cohesive policies and the most effective overall use of resources.I am still considering the recommendations in the review of the organisation required to deal with economic development and will be making an announcement as soon as possible.As I stated previously my overall objective is to improve the machinery of government in Northern Ireland and make it more accountable to my direction and control. I am confident that the changes proposed will be important steps towards that objective.
Police (Complaints Procedure)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many hours were spent in investigating complaints against the police and at what total cost during the past year; and if he will review the complaints procedure with a view to improving the system.
During 1980 a total of 2,077 complaints were made by members of the public against the police under section 13(1) of the Police Act (Northern Ireland) 1970. It is not possible without disproportionate cost to calculate either the total number of hours spent on investigating complaints or the total costs involved.During 1980 the Royal Ulster Constabulary complaints and discipline department was inspected by one of Her Majesty's inspectors of constabulary. His recommendations have been accepted by the chief constable and are being implemented in so far as they relate to the Royal Ulster Constabulary.The Home Secretary is currently considering a recommendation by the Police Complaints Board for England and Wales that there be an independent element in the investigation of complaints of serious injury. The Secretary of State will consider whether and how any proposals the Home Secretary may make for modifying the complaints system should be implemented in Northern Ireland.
Sheltered Dwellings
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will ascertain from the Northern Ireland Housing Executive the number of sheltered dwellings in each region, the number under construction in each region and the number required to meet the present need in each region; and what plans the Northern Ireland Housing Executive has to meet the need in each region by 1986.
The chairman of the Northern Ireland Housing Executive informs me that 74 units of sheltered accommodation are under construction in the Belfast region. Further schemes will be included in the planned 5-year programme. The executive has no plans to provide sheltered accommodation in the other five regions.The number of sheltered dwellings and the waiting list for each region are as follows:
| Region | Number of Dwellings | Waiting List (Group B 3 only)* |
| Belfast | 289 | 43 |
| South East | 58 | 22 |
| South | 44 | 9 |
| North East | — | 4 |
| North West | 6 | 4 |
| West | — | — |
| * Elderly persons in need of warden supervised accommodation. | ||
Baton Rounds
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many baton rounds have been fired by the police in Northern Ireland since 1 January to the latest available date.
16,588 plastic baton rounds have been fired by the police in Northern Ireland from 1 January to 23 July 1981.
Terrorism (Explosive Devices)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many landmines, booby traps,
| Police Div. | Land Mines | Trip-wire Booby Traps | Mortar Attacks | Blast Incendaries | Blast Bombs | Car Bombs | Cassette Incendiaries |
| A | — | — | — | — (3) | — | 1 | — |
| B | — | — | — | 9 (3) | 13 | 1 | — |
| C | — | — | — | 24 (3) | 1 | — | |
| D | — | — | — | 13 (4) | —(2) | — | — |
| E | — | 1 | — | 11 (1) | 1 | — | — |
| F | 1 | — | — | 5 | 1(1) | — | — |
| G | — | —(1) | — | —(1) | 1 | — | — |
| H | 11 | 3(2) | 1(1) | 29 (8) | 14(5) | 5(1) | — |
| J | — | 1 | — | — | 1(1) | 1 | — |
| K | 1 | 1(1) | — | 20 (9) | 4(2) | 3 | —(1) |
| L | 2 | 1(1) | — | 6 (1) | 1 | 2(1) | — |
| M | — | — | — | 15 (6) | —(2) | 4(1) | — |
| N | — | —(1) | — | 26(10) | 1(1) | 1(1) | —(1) |
| O | — | — | — | 9 (6) | 2 | — | — |
| P | — | — | — | —(1) | 1 | 1 | — |
| R | — | 1 | — | 4 (1) | 4 | —(1) | — |
Economic Council
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will list the various reports completed by the Economic Council; and how many of its recommendations he has implemented.
The following reports have been completed by the Northern Ireland Economic Council since its reorganisation in 1977:
- Representations to Government on some problems of Agriculture (February 1978).
- Annual Statement of Work 1977–78 (September 1978).
- Recommendations on Energy Policy in Northern Ireland (September 1978)
- The Development of Horticulture in Northern Ireland—some comments by the Economic Council (January 1979).
- Statement of views on Air Passenger Service (February 1979).
- Statement of views on Sea Ferry Services (May 1979).
- Economic and Social Progress in Northern Ireland: A response to the Government's Discussion Paper (June 1979).
- Annual Report 1978–79 (September 1979).
- Government Statement on Energy Policy in Northern Ireland: Comments by the Economic Council (September 1979).
- The Availability, Supply and Development of Management for Industry and Commerce in Northern Ireland (November 1979).
- The Clothing Industry in Northern Ireland (December 1979).
- Industrial Development Policy (April 1980).
- Energy Conservation (April 1980).
- Unemployment in Northern Ireland 1974–1979 (September 1980).
- Annual Report 1979–1980 (October 1980).
- Further Study of Gas Pipeline (September 1980).
- Advanced Technology (November 1980.)
- Public Expenditure Comparisons between Northern Ireland and Great Britain (January 1981).
- The Northern Ireland Construction Industry (March 1981).
- Economic Assessment (April 1981).
- Public Expenditure Priorities—Roads (April 1981).
- Public Expenditure Priorities—Housing (May 1981).
- Employment Patterns in Northern Ireland 1950–1980 (June 1981).
mortars, blast incendiaries, blast bombs, car bombs and incendiary devices were used by terrorists in 1980 in each Royal Ulster Constabulary division.
The information requested is as follows:The Economic Council has a most useful role to play as a source of advice for the Government on the development of economic policy and monitoring of economic planning in Northern Ireland. Its reports are studied carefully. Both I and my team of Ministers always welcome the opportunity of discussions with the chairman and members of the council.Within the constraints of public expenditure limits full cognisance is taken of the Northern Ireland Economic Council's reports in the evolution of policy.
Government Policy (Publicity)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland whether he will engage public relations consultants to improve the presentation of the case for the continuance of Northern Ireland within the United Kingdom.
The majority of the people of Northern Ireland have indicated clearly through the ballot box that they wish to remain part of the United Kingdom. The Government take every opportunity to explain both at home and abroad the constitutional position of the Province within the United Kingdom. I have no plans to appoint public relations consultants.
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what publications have been issued to present the case for the continuance of Northern Ireland within the United Kingdom; and what is their distribution at home and abroad.
The constitutional position of Northern Ireland within the United Kingdom, its history and the legislation under which it is governed are clearly set out in two Government publications. Both of these—the Ulster Year Book and a booklet entitled Northern Ireland—are given a wide distribution both at home and abroad, particularly in the United States of America. The position is also frequently presented through Government statements which are widely publicised in the media in the United Kingdom and overseas.
Diplomats (United States)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what attachments have been made from his Department to Her Majesty's embassy in Washington and to consular and other posts in the United States of America.
One member of the Northern Ireland Civil Service is currently on secondment to Her Majesty's embassy, Washington. Two officials from the Department of Commerce, Northern Ireland, currently work full-time at the Northern Ireland Industrial Development Office in New York, and six further Department of Commerce officials are attached to Her Majesty's consulates general in New York, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Los Angeles and San Francisco.
Maze Prison
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many pamphlets setting out Her Majesty's Government's policies on the H-blocks have been distributed; and to whom.
Six booklets have been issued setting out the Government's position on the Maze prison and the hunger strikes. They have been widely distributed among hon. Members, Members of the House of Lords, Members of the European Parliament and to Government posts overseas. Distribution has also covered the local, national and international media. The publications are as follows: H Blocks—the Facts: H Blocks—the Reality: Day to Day life in Northern Ireland Prisons: What the Papers Say—two editions giving international editorial comment on the hunger strikes: and Scope for Further Improvements in Prison Life.
Health And Social Services Boards
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what has been the total amount donated and spent in free funds in each of the four health and social services boards for the past four years.
The information, from the audited accounts of the health and social services boards, is as follows:
| Donations | ||||
| £,000 | ||||
| Financial Year | ||||
| Board | 1976–77 | 1977–78 | 1978–79 | 1979–80 |
| Northern | 48 | 43 | 57 | 101 |
| Eastern | 185 | 139 | 212 | 380 |
| Western | 22 | 26 | 34 | 48 |
| Southern | 29 | 37 | 31 | 36 |
Expenditure
| ||||
£, 000
| ||||
Financial Year
| ||||
Board
| 1976–77
| 1977–78
| 1978–79
| 1979–80
|
| Northern | 77 | 61 | 63 | 106 |
| Eastern | 267 | 411 | 265 | 342 |
| Western | 27 | 21 | 34 | 44 |
| Southern | 19 | 29 | 25 | 28 |
Pupil-Teacher Ratios (East Belfast)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what is the pupil-teacher ratio for primary schools in east Belfast; and what it was in 1979 and 1980.
Pupil-teacher ratios in primary schools in East Belfast are as follows:
| Pupil-teachers ratio | |
| 1978–79 | 21·7 |
| 1979–80 | 22·1 |
| 1980–81 | 22·0 |
Grammar Schools
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what was the total amount paid out in capital expenditure grants to A and B group grammar schools, respectively, in 1980–81 in each education board area.
Capital grants for buildings paid to group A grammar schools are as follows:
| £ | |
| Belfast | 420,000 |
| North-Eastern | 460,000 |
| South-Eastern | 244,000 |
| Southern | 168,000 |
| Western | 261,000 |
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (1) what was the total number and total cost of grammar school scholarships in each education board area for 1979–80;(2) what was the total amount of salary grant paid out to voluntary grammar schools in 1979–80.
1. Nothing. Grammar school scholarships were abolished with effect from 1 September 1978.2. School year 1979–80, £7,441,392.
Handicapped Pupils
asked the Secretary of State for Ireland (1) how many handicapped pupils were receiving home tuition in 1980–81 in each area; why such tuition is necessary; and what assistance is given by the Department of Education;(2) how many handicapped pupils from Northern Ireland were educated in 1980–81 in the Republic of Ireland; and what was the location of each school, the number attending each school and the total cost to each area board in the same period.
1. The number of pupils receiving home tuition in 1980–81 in each education and library board area was as follows:
| Number of pupils | |
| Belfast | 27 |
| North-Eastern | 32 |
| South-Eastern | 45 |
| Western | 48 |
| Southern | 58 |
| School | Pupils 1980–81 |
| St. Joseph's School for deaf Boys, Cabra, Dublin | 12 |
| St. Mary's School for hearing-impaired children, Cabra, Dublin | 14 |
| St Joseph's School and Home for the Blind, Drumcondra, Dublin | 2 |
| St. Michael's School, Chapelisod, Co. Dublin | 1 |
| St. Mary's School for the visually impaired, Merrion Road, Dublin | 1 |
| St. Augustine's Residential Special School, Blackrook, Co. Dublin | 1 |
| St. Raphael's, Celbridge, Co. Kildare | 2 |
| Total | 33 |
| 1980–81 | |
| £ | |
| Belfast | 6,200 |
| North-Eastern | 5,800 |
| South-Eastern | 6,700 |
| Western | 20,600 |
| Southern | 22,600 |
Special Service Award
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what has been the result of his consideration of the suggestion to recommend the creation of a special service award to members of the Royal Ulster Constabulary Reserve and the Royal Ulster Constabulary who have served in Northern Ireland during the present troubles.
The suggestion remains under consideration.
Industrial Strategy Review
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (1) if he will make a statement on the industrial strategy review, published in January 1981;(2) whether he considers the 48,000 jobs planned in the next five years by the industrial strategy review sufficient, in view of the present figure of over 100,000 unemployed;
(3) if he is satisfied that his Department will be able to create 48,000 jobs in the next five years in Northern Ireland as envisaged in the industrial strategy review.
I shall reply to the hon. Gentleman as soon as possible.
Bakery Industry
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, in view of the threat to jobs in the bakery industry caused by the smuggling of loaves from the Republic of Ireland into Northern Ireland, if he will take steps to rectify the situation.
I shall reply to the hon. Gentleman as soon as possible.
Baird Report
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland in what ways he proposes to implement the recommendations of the Baird report.
Responsibility for the implementation of the recommendations rests mainly with the health and social services boards and professional and training organisations in Northern Ireland. Consultations with these bodies are now complete. The boards have given the recommendations a high priority. They appointed special advisory groups to oversee the early implementation of those recommendations without major resource implications and planning for the remainder. Implementation is proceeding as resources permit.
Queen's University (Belfast)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what increase or reduction is expected in the funds to be made available to the Queen's university of Belfast for the academic year 1981–82.
I shall reply to the hon. Gentleman as soon as possible.
Hunger Strikers
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will set out what is on offer to the Irish Republican Army hunger strikers if they end their strike.
I shall reply to the hon. Gentleman as soon as possible.
Carrickfergus (Grant-Aid)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, in view of the larger percentage of unemployed at Carrickfergus compared with Antrim, why he has refused to give a similar 50 per cent. aid grant to Carrickfergus to that which he has given to Antrim.
I shall reply to the hon. Gentleman as soon as possible.
Mota-Regda
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement on the negotiations he has had with the German company Mota-Regda for location of its factory in Carrickfergus; and whether he has any information why the firm chose Buncrana in the Republic of Ireland.
I shall reply to the hon. Gentleman as soon as possible.
Kilroot Power Station
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement on the future of the Kilroot power station.
I shall reply to the hon. Gentleman as soon as possible.
Housing Executive (Rent Debt)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what are the reasons why the rent debt on Housing Executive houses has risen by £2 million to £12 million since 1980; and if he will take immediate steps to reclaim this amount.
I shall reply to the hon. Gentleman as soon as possible.
Security Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland whether the security statistics for the first six months of 1981, together with details of convictions obtained during the period, are now available.
| Statistics on security Part I | |||||||
| Yearly figures | |||||||
| 1971 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | 1977 | |
| Shooting incidents | 1,756 | 10,628 | 5,018 | 3,206 | 1,803 | 1,908 | 1,081 |
| Explosives | 1,022 | 1,382 | 978 | 685 | 399 | 766 | 366 |
| Bombs neutralised | 493 | 471 | 542 | 428 | 236 | 426 | 169 |
| Weight of explosives (in lbs)*: | |||||||
| In explosions | 10,972 | 47,462 | 47,472 | 46,435 | 13,753 | 17,596 | 2,839 |
| Neutralised | 3,001 | 19,978 | 32,450 | 27,094 | 11,159 | 16,252 | 2,188 |
| Armed robberies | 437 | 1,931 | 1,215 | 1,231 | 1,201 | 813 | 591 |
| Amount stolen £ | 303,787 | 790,687 | 612,015 | 572,951 | 572,105 | 545,497 | 446,988 |
| Malicious fires† | — | — | 587 | 636 | 248 | 453 | 432 |
| Deaths: | |||||||
| Civilians† | 115 | 322 | 171 | 166 | 216 | 245 | 69 |
| Army/UDR | 48 | 129 | 66 | 35 | 20 | 29 | 29 |
| RUC/RUC'R' | 11 | 17 | 13 | 15 | 11 | 23 | 14 |
| Injuries: | |||||||
| Civilians | 1,838 | 3,813 | 1,812 | 1,680 | 2,044 | 2,162 | 1,027 |
| Army/UDR | 390 | 578 | 548 | 483 | 167 | 264 | 188 |
| RUC/RUC'R' | 315 | 485 | 291 | 235 | 263 | 303 | 183 |
| * Estimated weight only. | |||||||
| † Consolidated figures not available for earlier years. | |||||||
| Statistics on security part I | ||||
| Yearly Figures | ||||
| 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | January-June 1981 | |
| Shooting Incidents | 755 | 728 | 642 | 403 |
| Explosives | 455 | 422 | 280 | 223 |
| Bombs Neutralised | 178 | 142 | 120 | 51 |
| Weight of Explosives (in lbs)* | ||||
| In explosions | 5,343 | 11,180·75 | 9,059 | 2,948·89 |
| Neutralised | 5,860·5 | 4,530·5 | 6,404·8 | 3,562·12 |
| Armed Robberies | 439 | 434 | 412 | 256 |
| Amount Stolen £ | 232,650 | 568,359 | 496,829 | 333,312 |
| Malicious Fires† | 269 | 315 | 275 | ‡ |
| Deaths: Civilians | 50 | 51 | 50 | 24 |
Yes. The information is as follows:
Statistics On Security
Part I— Statistics of Terrorist Activity
- Yearly totals for 1971–1980
- Six-monthly Total for January-June 1981
Statistics for terrorist activity comprise the following:
Part II— Statistics of Security Forces' Activity
- Yearly totals for 1971–1980
- Six-monthly Total for January-June 1981
Statistics for Security Forces' activity comprise the following:
Yearly Figures
| ||||
1978
| 1979
| 1980
| January-June 1981
| |
| Deaths: Army/UDR | 21 | 48 | 16 | 15 |
| Deaths: RUC/RUC'R' | 10 | 14 | 9 | 12 |
| Injuries: Civilians | 548 | 555 | 513 | 538 |
| Injuries: Army/UDR | 135 | 153 | 77 | 97 |
| Injuries: RUC/RUC'R' | 302 | 165 | 194 | 236 |
* Estimated Weight only. | ||||
| † Consolidated figures not available for earlier years. | ||||
| ‡ No figure available. | ||||
Statistics on Security Part II
| ||||||||
Yearly Figures
| ||||||||
1971
| 1972
| 1973
| 1974
| 1975
| 1976
| 1977
| 1978
| |
| Houses Searched (2) | 17,262 | 36,617 | 74,556 | 71,914 | 30,092 | 34,939 | 20,724 | 15,462 |
| Finds: Firearms | 717 | 1,264 | 1,595 | 1,260 | 825 | 837 | 590 | 400 |
| Finds: Ammunition (rds) | 157,944 | 183,410 | 187,399 | 147,202 | 73,604 | 70,306 | 52,091 | 43,512 |
| Finds: Explosives (lbs) | 2,748 | 41,488 | 38,418 | 26,120 | 11,565 | 21,714 | 3,809 | 2,108 |
Persons charged with serious security type offences (1)
| |||||||
1972
| 1973
| 1974
| 1975
| 1976
| 1977
| 1978
| |
| Murder | 13 | 71 | 75 | 138 | 120 | 131 | 60 |
| Attempted Murder | 16 | 85 | 75 | 88 | 121 | 135 | 79 |
| Firearms Offences | 242 | 631 | 544 | 460 | 353 | 301 | 225 |
| Explosives Offences | 86 | 236 | 161 | 100 | 215 | 146 | 79 |
| Theft Act | 111 | 186 | 232 | 314 | 188 | 203 | 151 |
| Other | 63 | 205 | 275 | 97 | 279 | 392 | 249 |
| TOTAL | 531 | 1,414 | 1,362 | 1,197 | 1,276 | 1,308 | 843 |
(1) These figures are not available in consolidated form for earlier years.
(2) Includes occupied and unoccupied houses searched.
Statistics on Security Part II
| |||
Yearly Figures
| |||
1979
| 1980
| January-June 1981
| |
| Houses searched† | 6,452 | 4,106 | 1,536 |
| Finds: Firearms | 301 | 203 | 195 |
| Finds: Amunition (rds) | 46,280 | 28,078 | 25,829 |
| Finds: Explosives (lbs) | 1,996·25 | 1,810 | 3,020·3 |
Persons Convicted and Sentences Imposed at Belfast Crown Court
January-June 1981
Notes on the Tables:
Imprisonment
| ||||||||||
Offence
| Number convicted
| Non-custodial sentence
| Borstal or Training Centre
| Less than 5 years
| 5 years and less than 7 years
| 7 years and less than 10 years
| 10 years and less than 15 years
| 15 years and less than 20 years
| 20 years and over
| Life
|
| Murder | 27 | 27 | ||||||||
| Attempted Murder | 11 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |||||
| Conspiracy to Murder | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
| Manslaughter | 10 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
Persons charged with serious security type offences*
| |||
1979
| 1980
| January-June 1981
| |
| Murder | 45 | 63 | 16 |
| Attempted Murder | 39 | 59 | 41 |
| Firearms Offences | 177 | 112 | 59 |
| Explosives Offences | 40 | 39 | 24 |
| Theft Act | 159 | 128 | 93 |
| Other | 210 | 149 | 239 |
| Total | 670 | 550 | 472 |
* These figures are not available in consolidated form for earlier years. | |||
| † Includes occupied and unoccupied houses searched. | |||
Offence
| Number convicted
| Non-custodial sentence
| Borstal or Training Centre
| Less than 5 years
| 5 years and less than 7 years
| 7 years and less than 10 years
| 10 years and less than 15 years
| 15 years and less than 20 years
| 20 years and over
| Life
|
| Wounding with Intent to do Grievous Bodily Harm | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Causing Grievous Bodily Harm | 8 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Assault Occasioning Grievous Bodily Harm | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Causing Explosion | 10 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | |||||
| Placing Explosive | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| Possessing Explosives with Intent | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | ||||||
| Other Explosive Offences | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Possessing a Firearm with Intent | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Possessing a Firearm | — | |||||||||
| Carrying a Firearm with Intent | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Other Major Firearms Offences | 44 | 17 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 1 | |||
| Minor Firearms Offences | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Robbery | 81 | 31 | 19 | 22 | 4 | 3 | 2 | |||
| Aggravated Burglary | — | |||||||||
| Hi-Jacking | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||||||
| Arson | 18 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Petrol Bomb Offences | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Criminal Damage | 12 | 6 | 6 | |||||||
| Escape Offences | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Assisting Offenders | 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| Intimidation | ||||||||||
| Withholding information | 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| Possessing Prohibited Articles | ||||||||||
| Common Law Riot | ||||||||||
| Assault | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Membership of Illegal Organisations | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||||||
| Unlawful Collection of Information | 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| Illegal Training | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Kidnapping and False Imprisonment | — | |||||||||
| Contributing to Resources of a Proscribed Organisation | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Malicious Damage | — | |||||||||
| TOTAL | 292 | 92 | 47 | 46 | 24 | 20 | 21 | 6 | 8 | 28 |
Housing Executive (Building Programme)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (1) how many houses the Northern Ireland Housing Executive plans to build in the boroughs of Castlereagh, Ards, Lisburn and North Down and the district council area of Down;(2) how many homes are planned to be built by the Northern Ireland Housing Executive for applicants requiring housing in the East Belfast, North Belfast, South Belfast and West Belfast areas.
[pursuant to his reply, 21 July 1981, c. 115]: These are matters for the Northern Ireland Housing Executive, but I understand from the chairman that the "new build" programme for 1981–82 includes plans for new dwellings shown as follows. And the executive is preparing a five-year programme to be submitted in the autumn.
Dwellings
| |
| Castlereagh | 78 |
| Ards | 199 |
| Lisburn | 372 |
| North Down | 108 |
| Down | 78 |
| East Belfast District 2 | 466 |
| North Belfast Districts 4 and 6 | 536 |
| South Belfast District 7 | 261 |
| West Belfast Districts 3 and 5 | 389 |
Transport
Orange Badge Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will now announce his proposals for curbing abuse of the orange badge scheme.
The orange badge scheme is an extremely valuable aid to mobility for the disabled which allows certain exemptions from parking regulations for vehicles carrying disabled and blind people who would otherwise have great difficulty in making important visits by car. However, the Government have been concerned by evidence of growing abuse of the scheme and misuse of the badges by able-bodied people. This leads to unnecessary proliferation of the badges and traffic congestion for other motorists. Misuse also tends to bring the whole scheme into disrepute and puts at risk the sympathetic treatment and the benefits which disabled people should expect from it.The Government have therefore already introduced a provision into the Disabled Persons Act 1981 which has just received Royal Assent to make misuse of the orange badge by people who are not entitled to it a specific and additional traffic offence with penalties. At the moment, misuse of the badge gives rise only to an ordinary parking offence.This measure is, however, only one element of a wider package of measures to reduce abuse and to improve the operation of the scheme generally. We propose to reduce abuse in the issue of badges by defining more clearly in regulations the categories of people entitled to them. Badges would in future be available to recipients of mobility allowance, to the blind, to those using vehicles supplied by Government Departments or receiving grants towards their own vehicles, and to other people with a permanent and substantial disability which causes very considerable difficulty in walking, except for children under 2 years of age. This should simplify the task of issuing authorities and applicants, because apart from the last category, where we would expect medical advice to be sought in the more difficult cases, entitlement would be virtually automatic.We also propose, in new regulations, to clarify the circumstances in which local authorities may refuse to issue a badge and emphasise their power to require the return of a badge in the event of misuse. We also propose to alter the design of the badge, making the expiry date more prominent as an aid to enforcement, and to increase the discretionary fee for the issue of a badge from £1 to £2.At the same time local authorities would be provided with clear guidance about the issue of badges and about administration of the scheme generally. They would be asked to discontinue the issue of the non-statutory rear badges, which have been a source of complaint, and be encouraged to provide transparent adhesive containers to permit badges to be removed more easily from the windscreen when not in use. Applicants for badges would be issued with a new explanatory leaflet emphasising their obligations as well as privilieges under the scheme.These proposals are the outcome of wide-ranging consultations with all the interested organisations, and with the all-party disablement group, and include a number of modifications to take account of their views, to the extent that it is possible to reach a consensus on such a sensitive matter. There are clearly conflicting interests. The problem has been to strike a fair balance between the needs of disabled people and those of other road users. We have also taken particular care to ensure that, in tackling problems of abuse, people with genuine mobility problems are not deprived of their entitlement to a badge.We believe that these proposals ought to achieve a wide measure of support, particularly amongst disabled people themselves. We are therefore glad to be able to announce them during the International Year of Disabled People. We shall be consulting interested bodies on the draft of the new regulations very shortly, and we shall take careful notice of their views before laying regulations before the House.
Civil Service Dispute (Driving Licence Applications)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what was the statutory basis for his decision that the driver and vehicle licensing centre, Swansea, could advise motorists that receipt of licence applications at Swansea post office would be an adequate defence against legal action for not having a licence during the period of the Civil Service dispute.
Anyone who has previously held a licence and is still entitled to drive may do so, under section 84(4) of the Road Traffic Act 1972, once his application has been received by the Secretary of State. I intend to extend this entitlement to first-time applicants by regulations when the Transport Bill receives Royal Assent. It is open to me to designate any person to carry out the function of receiving applications on my behalf. I have therefore designated the head postmaster at Swansea to receive any mail addressed to the driver and vehicle licensing centre which cannot be delivered during the current period of industrial action, and have requested him to hold it for me in secure conditions.
British Railways (Expenditure And Employment)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what is the current level of capita] expenditure and the number of employees in British Railways.
The current public expenditure White Paper—Cmnd 8175—shows that the board forecasts a capital requirement in 1981–81 of £291 million—1980 survey prices. Latest manpower figures show a corporate total of 236,154 employees, of whom 213,715 are employed in the rail businesses—including British Rail Engineering Ltd.
Midland Link Motorway
asked the Secretary of State for Transport on what dates, since May, he has discussed with the chairman of highways of West Midlands county council the problems of the Midland link motorways.
I discussed the problems of the Midland links motorways with the chairman of highways, West Midlands county council, on 7 July 1981.
Signposts
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what recommendations his Department has given to local authorities about the replacement of signposts with the traditional arms.
There is no need to replace any of these signposts until they are in need of repair or replacement. At that stage we recommend retention of these signposts, wherever possible, on roads in rural areas with light traffic and low speeds.
Motorways
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many miles of motorway are due to be (a) started and (b) completed in 1981.
In England 45 miles of motorway should have been started by the end of the year, including 2·6 miles of local authority motorway for which 100 per cent. grant is being provided by my Department. In addition, advanced works are starting on two schemes for which the main works, totalling eight miles should start in 1982. Thirty-six miles are expected to open during 1981, including one mile of 100 per cent. grant-aided motorway.
Road Accidents (Statistics)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport (1) if he will give estimates for 1980 for (a) road accidents by severity, (b) rates of vehicle involvement in accidents, by class of vehicle, and (c) accident rates, by class of road;(2) how many injury accidents there were in 1980 in Great Britain on
(a) motorways and A(M) roads, (b) roads in built up areas; and (c) roads in non-built up areas.
The information requested will be published later this year in "Road Accidents Great Britain 1980". In the meantime, I shall write to the hon. Member.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many fatal accidents in the last year for which figures are conveniently available involved (a) motor cycles, (b) cars and (c) heavy goods vehicles.
The available information is as follows:
| Vehicles involved in fatal accidents: Great Britain 1979 | |
| Number | |
| Two-wheeled motor vehicles | 1,431 |
| Cars | 5,494 |
| Goods vehicles (over 1½ tons unladen weight) | 1,042 |
Environment
Council House Sales
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many council houses have been sold to sitting tenants since May 1979.
Separate information on sales to sitting tenants is not available for the whole period, but a total of about 140,000 local authority and new town dwellings in Great Britain were sold in April 1979 to March 1981. In April 1980 to March 1981, 72,000, sales out of the total of 80,000, were to sitting tenants.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement about the recent meeting between officials of his Department and representatives of Scunthorpe borough council relating to the rate of progress of council house sales.
The council's representatives provided information, which we are considering, on arrangements which the council is making to accelerate its timetable for implementing the right to buy.
Construction Industry
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is his assessment of the reasons why the number of new commissions in the construction industry in the Midlands fell by 6·2 per cent. in the first quarter of 1981 when the figure for Great Britain as a whole showed an increase of 22·1 per cent.
The hon. Member is presumably referring to the results of the quarterly survey of new commissions for private architects carried out by the Royal Institute of British Architects. As this is an independent survey undertaken by members of the architectural profession for its own information, the hon. Member is advised to approach the institute directly for any further analysis or assessment of its findings.
Asbestos
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if his Department is sponsoring any research on the health hazards of asbestos in water; and if he will make a statement.
Neither I nor my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Social Services is sponsoring any such research. However, I am supporting a limited survey to determine the levels of asbestos in drinking water in the United Kingdom.The Environmental Protection Agency in the United States has been engaged for nearly eight years on research into possible health hazards presented by asbestos in drinking water. So far no hazard has been proved.My Department and the Department of Health and Social Security continue to keep the problem under review.
Housing Improvements
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the current number of houses or flats without (a) an indoor lavatory and (b) an indoor bathroom or shower; how many of these homes are in the private sector and the public sector, respectively; and by what date such facilities might be expected to be universally available, assuming present rates of improvement progress.
The available information from the 1976 English house condition survey is as follows:
| England | |||
| Thousand dwellings | |||
| Amenity lacked | Rented from local authority or new town | Other (including housing associations and vacant dwellings | All dwellings |
| WC inside dwelling | 157 | 926 | 1,083 |
| Bath or shower in a bathroom | 45 | 755 | 800 |
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will estimate the cost to public funds of instituting a programme to provide every home in England and Wales, whose occupants wish it, with an indoor lavatory and an indoor bathroom or shower by the end of 1986, to be financed by a specially high rate of improvement grant of 90 per cent., it being understood that this rate would only be paid if the work were completed by 31 December 1986, following which the higher level of grant would not be available.
It is not possible to provide such an estimate until the information is available from this year's house condition surveys in England and Wales on the number of homes currently without lavatories and bathrooms. Intermediate grants towards the cost of installing these amenities are already available at the rate of 75 per cent., or 90 per cent. in cases of hardship, and these grants are mandatory.
Construction Industry (Unemployment)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the level of construction industry unemployment, particularly in that part of the industry which deals with improvement; and what action he proposes to take to reduce it.
I shall answer this question shortly.
Lead (Screening Programme)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he will publish the detailed results of the United Kingdom part of the first campaign in the European Community population screening programme for lead.
A report entitled "European Community Screening Programme for lead: United Kingdom Results for 1979–80" will be published early in August. Copies will be placed in the Library of the House. The report fills in the detail which underlay the summary of results which was placed in the Library last year.The blood-lead levels of the population screened were generally well within the reference level prescribed by the European Community directive which governed the campaign: and the results, which were taken into account before my right hon. Friend the Minister for Local Government and Environmental Services made his statement about lead on 11 May, provide no cause for alarm. Given however that about 1 per cent. of the sample population registered blood-lead levels above the reference level of 35 micrograms per 100 millilitres, they confirm the need for continued vigilance, especially where people are exposed to lead from a number of sources at once.The second and final campaign of the screening programme has just been completed. Provisional results will be announced as soon as they are available, with detailed results to follow.
Rent And Rates (Rebates And Allowances)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is his latest best estimate for the number (a) one-parent families and (b) two-parent families receiving rent rebates and allowances and rates rebates; and if he will give in each case those receiving benefit as a percentage of those eligible.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply that I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Norfolk, North (Mr. Howell) on 1 December 1980.—[Vol. 995, c. 87–88.]
Riot Damage
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will assist those county councils which will face financial difficulties because of riot damage by making a contribution to them on a similar basis to that made when storms and floods create similar problems.
We will certainly consider sympathetically the case of any authority which faces an undue financial burden locally as a result of riot damage.
Mortgage Defaulters
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will give the latest available figures for the number of (a) one-parent families, (b) two-parent families, and (c) other households who were accepted as homeless because of mortgage default.
The following are the latest available estimates:
| Households accepted by local authorities as homeless who lost their last accommodation because of mortgage default: England: 1st half 1980 | |
| Number | |
| 1-parent families* | 300 |
| 2-parent families† | 600 |
| Other households | 100 |
| Total households | 1,000 |
| * Households in which the applicant is a lone parent with children aged 16 or less. | |
| † Households with children aged 16 or less, where the applicant's spouse-cohabitee is a member of the household. | |
Housing Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what are the latest figures for the numbers and proportions of (a) one-parent families, and (b) two-parent families living in (i) private rented housing, (ii) local authority housing, (iii) owner-occupied housing with a mortgage, (iv) owner-occupied housing owned outright, (v) shared accommodation, and (vi) housing association accommodation.
The following is the latest available information:
| Families by tenure: Great Britain 1977–78 | ||
| Percentages | ||
| 1-parent family | 2-parent family | |
| Private rented unfurnished or from housing association | 8 | 4 |
1-parent family
| 2-parent family
| |
| Private rented furnished | 3 | 1 |
| Rented with job or business | 2 | 4 |
| Local authority | 56 | 30 |
| Owned with mortgage | 20 | 51 |
| Owned outright | 12 | 9 |
| All tenures | 100 | 100 |
Source: General Household Survey (OPCS)
The Office of Population Censuses and Surveys estimates that in mid-1979 there were 860,000 one-parent families in Great Britain. The total number of families, estimated from child benefit records, was 7·2 million.
Airey Houses (Demolition)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will take steps to compensate owner-occupiers from demolition orders resulting from a local authority decision concerning structural defects in Airey houses.
The provisions for compensation for owners of houses subject to demolition orders are laid down by law. Owner-occupiers, subject to certain qualifying requirements, would normally be eligible for an owner-occupier supplement equivalent to the market value of the property less the land which they would retain. They may also qualify for other assistance—for example, home loss payments, disturbance payments and help with rehousing.
Burns Committee Report
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he intends to publish the Burns committee report "The Review of Local Authority Assistance to Industry and Commerce" and at what price per copy.
Copies of the report were placed in the Library on 27 April 1981. Since that date copies have been made freely available in response to bona fide inquiries from members of the public. It is not intended to publish the report formally or to charge for copies unless there is an expectedly high demand in future.
Royal Wedding
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether, in view of the fact that the Government's declaration of the Royal Wedding day as a public holiday is causing financial difficulties to those public authorities which have to maintain essential public services by paying double time, and as this is adversely affecting the cash limits, he will give the reason why he will not investigate how these public authorities may be financially assisted.
The Government do not make special provision for public holidays in addition to whatever Exchequer support is normally paid to public authorities in support of their accepted or approved expenditure. I have had no indication from the authorities for which I am responsible to suggest any need to consider whether to depart from this principle in respect of the public holiday on 29 July for the Royal Wedding.
Alkali Inspectorate
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if, in view of the broad support from the National Society for Clean Air, the Institution of Environmental Health Officers, the Confederation of British Industry and others, for the recommendations of the Royal Commission on environmental pollution that the Alkali Inspectorate be returned to the direct control of his Department, he will take steps to make this transfer; and when he will make an announcement.
My right hon. Friend is aware of the various views of interested parties on the recommendations in the fifth report of the Royal Commission on environmental pollution including those relating to the Alkali and Clean Air Inspectorate. The Government will respond to those recommendations as soon as practicable and an announcement will then be made.
Public Expenditure
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will give as much detailed information as may be readily available showing the extent to which public money has increased or decreased, at monthly intervals since May 1979, in the Brixton, Finsbury Park, Forest Gate, Woolwich and Wood Green areas of London, in Toxteth, Liverpool, and in Moss Side, Manchester; and if he will compare the annual totals with the totals for the previous two years.
Information substantially in the form requested is either unavailable or could not be provided except at disproportionate expense.
Toxteth (Ministerial Visits)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment on how many occasions he has visited Liverpool, Toxteth, since taking office; and whether he plans to visit any further areas where disturbances have taken place.
I visited Liverpool on six occasions before the present extended visit; during three of these I visited parts of Toxteth. In the last two weeks I have visited many areas of Merseyside, including Toxteth.
Local Authority Circulars
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on his progress in reducing circulars to local authorities.
In the 12 months ended 30 April 1981, Government Department issued 614 circulars and other communications to local authorities in Great Britain. Compared with the 1,873 communications issued during the last 12 months of the previous Administration, this is a reduction of 67 per cent. Government advice is continuing to be confined strictly to matters on which local authorities really need information and guidance.I take this opportunity of correcting the figures given in my right hon. Friend's written answer of 29 July 1980.—[Vol. 989, c.
628.] The number of communications issued in the 12 months ended 30 April 1980 was 671, representing a reduction of 64 per cent. on the previous 12 months.
Inner Cities (Private Housing)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will take further steps to draw the attention of local authorities to the need for land to be released for private housing in inner city areas.
I would draw the attention of local authorities to an inner cities research programme report from the department of land economy in Cambridge university published by my Department today. I have placed copies in the Library.Entitled "Report No. 4—Private Housing Development Process: a case study" and based on research in Nottingham, it identifies two key ways in which local authorities can help overcome some of the housing problems in inner city areas—first, by being willing to release land in their ownership to private house builders and, secondly, by giving more information on possible development sites. The report concludes that the majority of potential housing sites in inner Nottingham are in local authority ownership and that the most obvious way of alleviating problems over land availability is for the authority itself to release more land.The study finds that many developers are not solely interested in taking up "green field" sites and would be ready to build in the inner city.On the provision of more information on potential sites for house building, the use of the land registers of under-used land in public ownership which my right hon. Friend is publishing for 33 districts and London boroughs will help house builders to identify sites suitable for private housing in the diner cities. To date, 29 registers have been published revealing nearly 2,000 sites totalling 17.500 acres. The Department's initial assessment indicates that nearly half of this land appears to have potential for development or use, and of that over a quarter might be suitable for housing.
New Towns (Disposals)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what use he intends to make of the extended powers in the Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980 to give consents to disposals by new towns.
The Secretary of State has now issued a general consent to freehold disposals and leasehold disposals up to 150 years by new town development corporations and the Commission for the New Towns. Except for disposals to other public authorities—where special rules have applied since 1962—this requires them to be satisfied that the consideration for a disposal is riot less than the best that can reasonably be obtained. In consequence, my Department will no longer be examining proposed negotiated disposals which are otherwise in accord with the Government's general policy.
Housing Investment Programme Allocation
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what consequences there would be for a local authority's housing investment programme allocation if it were to pay a building society's valuation fee on behalf of a tenant exercising his right to buy in order to maximise the private financing of sales of council houses and hence the local authority's capital receipts.
I understand that such a scheme is under consideration by the metropolitan borough of Dudley. Such fee payments would not in our view count against en authority's housing investment programme allocation. The local authority would of course need to satisfy itself as to the powers under which such payments could properly be made.