Written Answers To Questions
Wednesday 7 April 1982
Trade
Export Credit Scheme
asked the Secretary for Trade if he intends to make changes under the sterling fixed rate export credit scheme; and if he will make a statement.
Following discussions with the main banking associations, the Government have reviewed the rate of return payable to the banks under the Export Credits Guarantee Department scheme for sterling fixed rate export credits. As a result, the Government have decided that the banks' margin on new fixed rate lending will be reduced from 1¼ per cent. over three-month sterling LIBOR to a maximum of ⅞ per cent. for credits involving repayment periods of less than 12 years. For credits of 12 years or more, the maximum margin will be ⅞ per cent. for the first 12 years and 1 per cent. thereafter. At the same time as these changes are introduced, arrangements will be made for interest make-up payments to the banks to be made by ECGD on a quarterly rather than half-yearly basis. In addition, certain detailed changes will be introduced to the methods of calculating amounts payable to the banks.These changes will apply to new facilities and my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Industry has asked me to confirm that they will also apply to the home shipbuilding scheme.ECGD and the Department of Industry will be writing shortly to the banks participating in the schemes notifying them of the new arrangements and of the date on which they will come into force.
Cars (Exports-Imports)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade if he will set out in tabular form for 1981, or the latest available 12-month period (a) the number of cars exported from the United Kingdom to the Union of Soviet Socialists Republics and Czechoslovakia, respectively, and (b) the number of cars imported into the United Kingdom from those two countries over the same period.
The available information is as follows:
| United Kingdom Trade in Motor Cars March 1980—February 1981 | ||
| Country whence consigned/country of destination | (Number) | |
| Imports | Exports | |
| Soviet Union | 11,201 | 36 |
| Czechoslovakia | 6,384 | 11 |
Source, Overseas Trade Statistics of the United Kingdom, SITC (R2) 781.0 and 784.1 [part].
World Trade (Statistics)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade what is his best estimate of the United Kingdom's share of world trade in manufactures in the fourth quarter of 1981 in terms of volume and his estimate of the extent to which this was affected by any speeding up of notifications of exports.
According to Treasury estimates, based on incomplete data, the United Kingdom share in the fourth quarter of 1981 was about 7·5 per cent; the effect on this of the speeding up of notifications was neglible.
Mr W Shiel (Survey Fee)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade why the survey fee for a passenger-carrying boat operated by Mr. W. Shiel of Seahouses, Northumberland, has increased from £191 to £250 in the current year.
The figures quoted are not strictly comparable. In 1981–82 the fee for a renewal survey on a class VI passenger ship was fixed at £191. From 1 April 1982, as in the case of most survey fees, the charge will be determined by the amount of time, including travelling time, required to complete the work, assessed at an hourly rate of £33·35 up to a maximum fee of £250. The fee for the survey of Mr. Shiel's ship may not therefore amount to £250; if the maximum fee is payable, it will reflect the fact that the costs involved will be equal to or exceed that figure.
Japanese Imports
asked the Minister for Trade whether he will now list, in specific, numerical terms in respect of major industries such as electronics, toys and motor manufacturing the detailed steps which Japan has indicated to him it intends to take to reduce her imports into the United Kingdom in both real and monetary terms in the financial year 1982–83 compared with 1981–82; and what action his Department intends to take to ensure that those reductions are fully achieved.
I shall reply to my hon. Friend as soon as possible.
Ministers (Overseas Visits)
asked the Minister for Trade whether he will set out in tabular form details of the visits undertaken by the present Minister for Trade and his immediate predecessor since May 1979 to overseas countries in their official capacities; on which visits the Minister was accompanied by United Kingdom business men; what was the cost to public funds of each visit; and what is the value of the orders obtained by United Kingdom firms, where known, as a result of each visit.
I shall reply to my hon. Friend as soon as possible.
Competition Act 1980
asked the Minister for Trade how many reports have been published by the Office of Fair Trading under section 3(10) of the Competition Act 1980.
Four.
asked the Minister for Trade on how many occasions he has passed on to the Director of Fair Trading representations received alleging anticompetitive practice covered by section 3(1) of the Competition Act 1980.
No separate record is kept of the number of representations received alleging anti-competitive practices within the meaning of section 2 of the Competition Act 1980. Those received by my Department are normally passed on to the Director General of Fair Trading or his officials.
asked the Minister for Trade what has been the average length of time taken by the Director of Fair Trading to complete investigations under section 3 of the Competition Act 1980.
The average length of time between the announcement of an investigation and publication of the Director General's report has been about 30 weeks.
asked the Minister for Trade on how many occasions he has exercised his powers under section 3(5) of the Competition Act 1980.
I have never directed the Director General not to proceed with an investigation under section 3.
asked the Minister for Trade how many representations from hon. Members he has received alleging anti-competitive practices defined under section 3(1) of the Competition Act 1980.
No separate record is kept of representations relating to anti-competitive practices. I understand that many hon. Members write to the Director General direct.
asked the Minister of Trade how many investigations have been instituted under section 3 of the Competition Act 1980; and, of these, how many have been related to newspapers.
Nine investigations have been announced; two involve newspapers.
Home Department
Police Equipment
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing, for each police authority area, expenditure in the years 1980 and 1981, respectively, on anti-riot equipment, including helmets, body armour and shields, personnel carriers and CS gas.
The Home Office has estimates of numbers of items of equipment. Details of expenditure are not held centrally, but by each police authority. The cost of assembling that information would be disproportionate.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing, for each police authority area, expenditure in the years 1980 and 1981 on telecommunications equipment and computers for all types of police work.
Total police authority expenditure in England and Wales on police vehicles, plant and machinery in the years 1979–80 and 1980–81 was £33·5 million and £40 million respectively. Central records do not show the proportion of that expenditure which was attributable to telecommunications equipment and computers and the information could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
False Imprisonment
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what account is taken of damage to a person's reputation when calculating compensation for false imprisonment;(2) if the wrongful conduct of a responsible public servant is taken into account when assessing compensation for anyone falsely imprisoned; and if the awards include any element of exemplary or punitive damages.
The procedure followed by the independent assessor, who advises the Secretary of State on the amount of compensation to be paid on a particular case, and the factors which he takes into account are explained in a memorandum which is sent to all persons to whom it has been decided in principle to pay compensation. The text of this memorandum was published in the Official Report in answer to a written question on 29 July 1976.—[Vol. 916, c. 328.] I am sending a copy to the right hon. Member.
Senior Police Officers
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether any rules apply to chief constables or other senior policemen who submit articles of political controversy to journals or newspapers which may be read by the general public; and in what circumstances such officers may be paid fees for such articles.
The Government are not responsible for articles written by chief constables or other senior policemen.
Police Activities (Public Interest)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will introduce legislation to prevent chief constables from denying to the news media access to police activities or public interest, such as riot control exercises, subject to his discretion; and if he will make a statement.
No.
Prison Population
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the prison population at the latest available date.
About 44,200 on 2 April 1982.
Murder Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department in how many cases, since the abolition of the death penalty, persons convicted of murder have subsequently been pardoned or had their conviction quashed.
Since the abolition of the death penalty in 1965 Timothy Evans is the only person convicted of murder to have been granted a free pardon on the recommendation of a Home Secretary. That part of the question relating to convictions quashed by the Court of Appeal is a matter for the Lord Chancellor; but I understand that the figures are not readily available and could not be obtained without disproportionate expense.
Civil Defence (Wales)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the answer of 26 November 1980, Official Report c. 114, what funds have been allocated for the provision of accommodation in sub-regional civil defence headquarters in Wales.
The precise amount required for North Wales in 1983–84 and 1984–85 in the sub-regional headquarters building programme has not yet been determined.
Citizenship Fees
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department why, following his statement about increases in the fees for registration or naturalisation, Official Report, 10 March, c. 423–24, the necessary forms were not made available until the increases had come into effect, thus imposing additional charges of £20 and £50, respectively, with immediate effect.
Forms were available to meet demands from individual applicants, but if the hon. Member has a particular case in mind I shall be glad to look into it.
Community Projects Foundation
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will publish in the Official Report the following details about the community projects foundation (a) date of incorporation, (b) terms of reference, (c) details of its constitution, (d) the names and addresses of trustees, (e) details of trust deed, including the extent of financial responsibility of the trustees, (f) details of the foundation's financial position and (g) date of submission of the latest set of accounts to the Charity Commission.
The community projects foundation, originally known as the young volunteer force foundation, was constituted on 12 December 1967 with the object of involving young people in service to the community. On 21 November 1977 the name was changed to community projects foundation and the activities were broadened to encompass a range of community work.While maintaining a programme of practical projects, the foundation also has a demonstration role in disseminating good practice. It is governed by a board of trustees appointed by my right hon. Friend, which is responsible for operations headed by a director. The trustees are:
- The Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede
- Mr. Ross Flockhart
- Mr. Francis J. C. Amos, CBE
- The hon. Member for Greenwich
- Mr. Geoffrey Drain, CBE, JP
- Mr. Colin Gilbraith
- My hon. Friend the Member for Saffron Walden (Mr. Haselhurst)
- Professor Walter James, CBE
- The Lady McCarthy
- Mr. A. David Owen
- Mr. Cecil Ross, MBE
- Mrs. Margaret Wingfield, CBE, JP
In 1981–82 the CPF received a grant of £695,000 from VSU. I shall send further details, with a copy of the trust deed, to my hon. Friend.
Energy
British Gas Corporation
asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he has any plans for an outside scrutiny of the efficiency of the British Gas Corporation.
My hon. Friend the Financial Secretary to the Treasury announced on 30 November 1981—[Vol. 14, c. 48–49]—that the efficiency of each nationalised industry is in future to be subject to outside scrutiny at least once every four years. Such scrutinies are to be carried out either by the Monopolies and Mergers Commission or by management consultants.In the case of British Gas, I have agreed with the corporation that my Department and the corporation will jointly commission an independent study by management consultants of the corporation's efficiency.The consultants who will be carrying out the study have yet to be selected, but it is my intention that they should begin their examination this year.
National Coal Board
asked the Secretary of State for Energy when the deferred deficit and operating grants in respect of 1981–82 will be paid to the National Coal Board.
The deferred grant of £198 million will be paid as soon as possible. Some £109 million will be met from the Vote on Account for Class IV, Vote 5. The remainder will be paid from a repayable advance from the Contingencies Fund pending parliamentary approval of the main Estimates for 1982–83.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy how the recent Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen dispute affected the National Coal Board's external financing requirement in 1981–82; and what change will be made to the board's 1982–83 external financing limit to reflect this and other factors.
The NCB's audited accounts for 1981–82 are not yet available, but the board has told me that the effects of the ASLEF dispute were responsible for £121 million of its external cash requirement in 1981–82 of £1,238 million. When account is taken of this, NCB's performance was consistent with its EFL of £1,117 million. The Government will not expect the NCB to recoup this £121 million in 1982–83, except to the extent that NCB recover sales lost in 1981–82.My right hon. Friend the Chief Secretary to the Treasury announced today the change of the NCB's EFL of £1,026 million for 1982–83, which was announced on 2 December last, to £962 million, to take account of a number of factors, including the recovery of sales after the ASLEF dispute, which the NCB expects to make in 1982–83, and the reduction in the employers' national insurance surcharge, and assistance for foundry coke producers, which were announced on 9 March.I shall announce in due course an appropriate adjustment to the board's deficit grant for 1982–83.
Central Electricity Generating Board (Coal Supplies)
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what steps he has taken to offset the effect of the rail stoppages earlier this year on supplies of coal to the Central Electricity Generating Board.
The Government have decided to make a grant of up to £17 million to cover the net cost of additional oil consumed by the board in generating electricity from 11 February to 3 March 1982 to offset in part the effect of the rail stoppages. Parliamentary approval of the grant will be sought in a Supplementary Estimate for the Industrial Support; Department of Energy Vote 1982–83, Class IV, 5. The grant will be accommodated within the industry's external financing limit, so no increase in public expenditure will be involved. Pending that approval the grant will be paid from a repayable advance from the Contingencies Fund.
Prime Minister
Council Of Ministers
asked the Prime Minister if she will list in the Official Report the actions taken by the Council of Ministers in furtherance of the framework decisions taken by each meeting of the European Council, over the past two and a half years.
It is normal for meetings of the European Council to ask the Council of Ministers or the Commission to take action in a number of fields. The list requested by my hon. Friend covering eight meetings of the European Council could be produced only at disproportionate expense, but progress at meetings of the Council on these and other topics is regularly reported to the House.
Royal Ulster Constabulary (Weapons)
asked the Prime Minister when Her Majesty's Government last asked the United States Government to release the Ruger pistols and rifles for the Royal Ulster Constabulary which formed part of the order frozen by President Carter in 1979; and when it is intended to raise the matter again.
The Government have left the United States Administration in no doubt of their view on this matter. It was discussed most recently in June 1981. As far as the future is concerned, as my hon. Friend the Under-Secretary of State for Northern Ireland indicated on 25 March, the Royal Ulster Constabulary has adequate and sufficient weapons: any request from the police authority for more weapons or weapons of a different sort will be sympathetically considered.
Information Technology
asked the Prime Minister which Departments are currently concerned with the promotion of information technology; what activities each is responsible for; what were their budgets in 1981–82; and what are their proposed budgets in 1982–83 for information technology.
The Department of Industry takes lead responsibility for the promotion of information technology outside Government Departments; it provides financial assistance for this and for the development of new IT products and services, and funding for the IT Year committee. The Treasury, through the Central Computer and Telecommunications Agency, is responsible for the promotion of IT applications within Government Departments, but each Department is also responsible for keeping its own operations under review in order to identify cost-effective IT applications. Many Departments are also contributing to IT Year activities.IT is generally not a separately identifiable item of Departmental expenditure. However, the Department of Industry allocated £19 million specifically for the development and application of information technology products in 1981–82 and has allocated a further sum of approximately £25 million for 1982–83. For information on allocations to other Department of Industry schemes within the broader IT field, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given her by the Minister of State, Department of Industry on 8 March 1982.
Government Hospitality Fund
asked the Prime Minister whether she will make a statement about the departmental responsibility for the Government hospitality fund.
Responsibility for this fund passed from the Minister for the Civil Service to my right hon. and noble Friend the then Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary on 1 April 1982. The fund will continue to arrange hospitality for distinguished overseas visitors invited to this country as official guests of the Government.
Industry
State Ownership
asked the Secretary of State for Industry what is the percentage State ownership of the following industries, by turnover: steel, metalworking, base chemicals, synthetic textiles, plastics, fine chemical, pharmaceuticals, glass, construction materials, cardboard, foundry, machine tools, capital goods, heavy engineering, arms, computer and office equipment, power generating equipment, electronics, consumer durables, shipbuilding and aircraft.
This information is not readily available and can be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
European Community (Grants And Aid)
asked the Secretary of State for Industry what sums of money were paid by way of grants or aid to industry from the European Economic Community to organisations in the Morecambe and Lonsdale constituency in the last year for which figures are available.
No grants from the European regional development fund were made in respect of industrial projects in the Morecambe and Lonsdale constituency during 1981. Such grants are in any case payable only in respect of projects which have already received United Kingdom regional aid, and are retained by the Government as a contribution thereto, as provided for in the fund regulation. There were no applications for loans from the European Investment Bank from firms in this area.
Inmos Ltd
asked the Secretary of State for Industry if the National Enterprise Board has any plans to raise additional funds from the private sector for investment in Inmos Ltd.
This is a matter for the NEB.
asked the Secretary of State for Industry when an announcement will be made on the siting of the second Inmos production unit in the United Kingdom.
This is a matter for the company. However, my right hon. Friend has received assurances from the company that its second United Kingdom production unit will be located in an assisted area, although it is too early to say what the actual location will be.
Hanson Trust
asked the Secretary of State for Industry what regional aid grant has been made to the Hanson Trust and for what purpose; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 6 April 1982, c. 286]: No regional development grants and no selective financial assistance under section 7 of the Industry Act 1972 has been made to date to the Hanson Trust.
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Common Agricultural Policy
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will support common agricultural policy price increases on products in surplus.
The Council of Agriculture Ministers has held three meetings to discuss the Commission's price proposals for 1982–83 and on each occasion we have urged the need for prudent price increases for products in surplus.
European Community (Grants And Aid)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what sums of money were paid by way of grants or aid to agriculture from the European Economic Community to organisations in the Morecambe and Lonsdale constituency in the last year for which figures are available.
I regret that the information requested is not available.
European Community (Exports To Russia)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if, pursuant to his replies of 2 March, Official Report, c. 66, and 19 February, Official Report, c. 235 to the hon. Member for Southend, East concerning export rebates for food exported to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, he has now received the comparable figures for 1981 from the Commission in respect of the other member States of the European Economic Community.
[pursuant to his reply, 24 March 1982, c. 204–5]: The Commission services have now given, as requested, an estimate of the cost of refunds paid for exports to the Soviet Union from the European Economic Community—excluding the United Kingdom—in the period January-September 1981. These are aggregate figures for the whole Community for each commodity, since I understand that the Commission does not have the figures broken down by individual member States. The figures that I have received are as follows:
| Tariff heading and Product | Estimated total cost (million ECU) |
| 02 Meats: | |
| Beef | 98·51 |
| Poultry | 9·68 |
| 04 Milk products: | |
| WMP | 26·70 |
| 08 Fruit: | |
| Lemons | 1·32 |
| 10 Cereals: | |
| Wheat | 11·33 |
| Barley | 17·84 |
| 11 Processed cereals: | |
| Flour | 40·67 |
| Malt | 8·52 |
| 15 Oils and fats: | |
| Olive oil | 0·10 |
| 17 Sugar: | |
| White sugar | 85·42 |
| Raw sugar | — |
| 21 Diverse food products | 50·0 |
| 22 Drinks: | |
| Wine | 9·76 |
| 23 Residues etc.: | |
| Soya cake | — |
| Animal feed | 18·22 |
| 379·07 |
Defence
British Antarctic Territory
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will consider affording extra protection to the British Antarctic Territory.
Article 1 of the Antarctic treaty prohibits any measures of a military nature in Antarctica. The United Kingdom, together with 24 other States—including Argentina—is bound by this provision.
Equipment Exhibition (New York)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if, in view of the adverse effect on the United Kingdom's negotiating position of holding an exhibition to promote sales of military equipment at the same time as the United Nations special session on disarmament in New York, is taking place, he will postpone the British Army equipment exhibition due to take place from 21 to 25 June.
No. There is no conflict of interest between these two events. We are fully committed to the pursuit of arms control and disarmament, but we have always recognised that, until multilateral agreements on disarmament that maintain the security of nations at lower levels of forces are achieved, the United Kingdom and other countries around the world will have to rely on adequately equipped armed forces to protect our independence and deter aggression. Just as we need to buy arms from our allies from time to time, so countries without their own defence industries will look to the United Kingdom and other industrialised nations to supply them with the equipment they need to defend themselves, and it would be inconsistent for us to deny them the right to adequate means of defence.
Baor (Television Service)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the cost of maintaining the British Army of the Rhine's television service for 1980–81 and 1981–82; what is the estimated cost for 1982–83; and what is the size of its audience.
The costs of the English language television service for British Forces, Germany, including those incurred on related works services both here and in Germany by the Property Services Agency, were £5·5 million in 1980–81, and are estimated to be £3·9 million in 1981–82 and £4·7 million in 1982–83. The service is now estimated to reach an audience of 158,000.
Aircraft Flight Recorders
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will ensure that a flight recorder be lodged in every military aircraft.
No. Although most new aircraft are fitted with accident data recorders, it is not practicable to fit them into older ones.
Cruise Missiles
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the weight of a cruise missile; and what will be the approximate total weight of any road transporter carrying such a missile.
The General Dynamics Tomahawk ground launched cruise missile weighs approximately 3,000 lb. The weight of the transporter-launcher which will carry the missiles will be about 30 tons—that is, about the same weight as a large commercial vehicle.
Mcv 80
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the state of progress with the MCV 80 project; and whether any problems have been encountered.
MCV 80 entered full development in 1979. Work is proceeding satisfactorily.
Argentine Navy (Warships)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list all British-built warships, by name and class, that are now in the possession of the Argentine Navy.
The Argentine Navy possesses two United Kingdom-built type 42 destroyers the ARA "Hercules" and the ARA "Santisima Trinidad", six ex-RN Ton class coastal minesweepers and an ex-RN Colossus class aircraft carrier purchased from the Netherlands Navy.
Argentina (Defence Equipment Sales)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he is now prepared to answer questions on the volume of defence equipment sales in respect of Argentina.
All defence sales to Argentina have been suspended. In the present exceptional circumstances I am prepared to consider questions on our past sales to Argentina on their merits.
Falkland Islands
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will indicate in detail the number and function of all Armed Services personnel available in the Falkland Islands at the time of the invasion.
A detachment of 75 Royal Marines together with a small survey party of Naval personnel from HMS "Endurance" were on the Falkland Islands at the time of the invasion.The function of the detachment was to assist the Governor of the Falkland Islands in maintaining the seat of government and to support him in his role as commander-in-chief in resisting any incursion.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will give the latest estimate of the number and functions of the Argentinian force which invaded the Falkland Islands.
I do not believe it would be in the public interest to disclose this information.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what steps are being taken to keep essential personnel in the Royal Navy who would otherwise be entitled to leave the Service during the Falkland Islands operation.
Steps are being taken to extend the service of those Royal Navy and Royal Marine officers who are nearing the end of their commissions but who are needed for the current operation. In addition, we intend to invoke the powers under section 4 of the Armed Forces Act 1966, and under schedule 7, paragraph 4A of the Army Act 1955 to retain in service ratings of the Royal Navy and Royal Marine other ranks for a period not exceeding 12 months from the date they would otherwise be entitled to be discharged or fall to be transferred to the Royal Fleet Reserve. The reason for these actions, beyond ensuring the continuance in service of all essential personnel, is to protect their status as members of Her Majesty's Armed Forces. We intend to use these powers only in the case of those who are needed for this operation, and to release them as soon as they can be spared.
Employment
Women
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will estimate the total number of unemployed women who are not registered at employment exchanges.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Wolverhampton, North-East (Mrs. Short) on 11 February 1982.—[Vol. 17, c. 437.]
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will estimate the number of women aged 16 to 59 years in employment as a percentage of the total female population for that age group for each of the past four years.
Estimates of the numbers of women in employment aged 16 to 59 years represented as a percentage of the total female population for that age group are given in the following table:
| Female employed labour force aged 16 to 59 as a percentage of total female population aged 16 to 59 (Great Britain) | |
| Percentage | |
| June 1978 | 59 |
| June 1979 | 60 |
| June 1980 | 59 |
| June 1981 | 56 |
Wages Councils
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many establishments in Wales come within the scope of wages councils.
On 31 December 1981 there were 22,001 establishments in Wales known to be within the scope of wages councils.
Wages Inspectors
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many wages inspectors are employed in Wales; and how many were employed in each of the last three years.
Currently five wages inspectors are employed in Wales. There were seven in 1979, five in 1980 and five in 1981.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many establishments in Wales were visited by wages inspectors in each of the past three years.
Information is not available in the precise form requested because some visits are advisory or explanatory in nature and these are not always recorded for statistical purposes, and because some inspections involve more than one visit.However, the following figures are available for establishments in Wales inspected by visit in each of the last three years:
| Number | |
| 1979 | 2,079 |
| 1980 | 2,131 |
| 1981 | 1,753 |
Information Technology
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what courses on information technology are sponsored by the Manpower Services Commission; how many people attended such courses in 1981; and what are the target figures for 1982.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
Retail Trade (Sunday Working)
asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether he is satisfied that adequate arrangements exist to detect infringements of the retail food and retail non-food wages council orders concerning payment for work on Sundays by employers who contravene the provisions of part IV of the Shops Act 1950.
Yes. I regard the current arrangements for detection of all infringements of wages council orders as adequate.
Dock Workers (Severance Scheme)
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what representations he has received from the National Association of Port Employers about the financing of the national voluntary severance scheme for dock workers; and if he will make a statement.
I have had two meetings and some correspondence with the National Association of Port Employers on this issue this year. The Government have not been prepared to agree to grant aid severances outside the ports of London and Liverpool. But to put the national voluntary severance scheme on to a sound financial footing and in recognition of the difficulties for the NVSS stemming from the special problems of the ports of London and Liverpool, I have told NAPE that for three years the Government will waive interest payments on the NVSS, defer capital repayments due and accept that the National Dock Labour Board shall raise from employers for severance purposes the same cash sum as they raised in 1981. I have also told it that the Government will seek parliamentary authority as necessary to extinguish NVSS debt of the order of £22 million in respect of past severances in the ports of London and Liverpool. The terms of this assistance are conditional on agreement regarding maximum severance payments.
Young Workers Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Employment when the first payments will be made to employers under the young workers scheme.
The scheme is a new employment measure announced by the Prime Minister in the House on 27 July 1981 and introduced in January of this year. Quarterly payments in respect of initial applications will begin this month. Provision has been made in the 1982–83 Supply Estimates under Class IV, Vote 14, subhead A5. Pending parliamentary approval of the Estimate, expenditure will be met by repayable advances from the Contingencies Fund.
Jobcentres And Private Employment Agencies
(Co-Operation)
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will make a statement on co-operation between the Manpower Services Commission's jobcentres and private employment agencies.
I am glad to be able to say that, from 13 April, licensed private employment agencies and employment businesses will be able to display details of their services in jobcentres. In return, these private establishments will provide reciprocal facilities for publicising Manpower Services Commission services. I warmly welcome these arrangements because they will assist jobs seekers in making use of all possible sources of help in finding jobs. I hope that as many private agencies as possible will come forward to take part in the scheme.
Overseas Development
World Development Fund
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what progress is being made in international negotiations on the concept of a world development fund as suggested by the Brandt Commission.
The Secretary-General of the United Nations has prepared a report on the proposal for a world development fund. At its thirty-sixth session the General Assembly unanimously adopted a decision taking note of this report.
World Bank
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what increase in front-end fees required by the World Bank has been made in the past 12 months; and whether increases are envisaged in the course of 1982.
The executive board of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development agreed on 5 January to establish a front-end fee of 1·5 per cent. on new IBRD loans, the fee being a one time charge due on the date of effectiveness of a loan. Borrowers may elect to capitalise the fee and have it financed from the loan. The amount and the continued existence of the front-end fee is subject to periodic review by the executive board in the light of the bank's income prospects. There are no immediate plans to increase or decrease it.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much more will be paid to the World Bank by developing countries in 1983, as compared with 1982, on account of higher interest charges and lower disbursements from IDA funds.
About $10 million more will be paid by developing countries in 1983 than in 1982 in respect of the new service fee on undisbursed balances of IDA loans which was agreed in January. It is not possible, however, to quantify how much more they will pay as a result of the introduction of the front-end fee on new IBRD loans as borrowers have the option of deferring payment and capitalising the fee as part of the loan.To compensate for the expected shortfall in IDA commitments during the World Bank financial year to 30 June 1982, lending by the IBRD to developing countries is being increased by $800 million over this period. Current terms for IBRD loans are repayment averaging about 17 years, including a four-year grace period, at 11·6 per cent. interest—which has remained unchanged this year—and the 1·5 per cent. front-end fee. This compares with IDA terms of repayment over 50 years, including a 10-year grace period, at no interests, with a service charge of ¾ per cent. on disbursed balances and the ½ per cent. fee on undisbursed balances. The amount of interest payable in 1983 on the new IBRD loans will depend on the timing and rate of their drawdown, and any variation in the interest rate for loans not yet approved.
Sudan And Sahel Region (Desertification Measures)
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if his Department would be prepared to assist the cultivation of jojoba in the Sudan and the Sahel region to combat desertification.
Subject to the priorities attached to the use by the recipient Governments of our bilateral aid, we would be prepared to consider requests to assist in combating desertification. Whether this would include the cultivation of jojoba would depend on the particular characteristics of the area involved. We already provide assistance for international research, including institutions concerned with arid and semi-arid regions.
Ethiopia
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he has anything to add to the reply of the Lord Privy Seal on 24 March, Official Report, column 183, relating to the figure for aid being given to the Government of Ethiopia.
Total expenditure in 1981–82 is now expected to be about £75,000. This represents the fulfilment of long-standing commitments and comprises £40,000 for places on extended training courses begun some years ago but not completed until 1981 or 1982, and £35,000 towards a commitment of £100,000 towards the total costs of a building connected with water resources. The remaining £65,000 of this latter commitment is expected to be spent in 1982–83; and the final expenditure on the training awards will be about £4,000. Ethiopia also benefits from aid from multilateral organisations to which Britain contributes.
Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs
Nuclear Test Ban
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether Her Majesty's Government will support the proposal by Japan at the United Nations committee on disarmament in Geneva that the committee should make use of the seismological data and telecommunications system which the World Meteorological Organisation possesses in order to facilitate the seismological verification of a comprehensive nuclear test ban.
Yes. The United Kingdom has already joined in two experiments using the World Meteorological Organisation's global telecommunications system to exchange seismic data on a trial basis. We support the fullest possible use of the World Meteorological Organisation network and will continue to seek progress on verification issues relating to a comprehensive test ban.
Falkland Islands
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what was the substance of the agreement between the Minister of State and his Argentine counterpart reached at the negotiations in New York in March and to which his predecessor referred in his speech in the House of Lords on 3 April.
At the New York talks the two sides considered in detail an Argentine proposal on procedures, including the setting up of a negotiating commission at ministerial level, for a more rapid tempo to negotiations on the dispute. We agreed to consider this proposal and to give a reply to the Argentine Government.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what was the substance of the sealed orders held by the governor of the Falkland Islands to be opened in the event of an Argentine invasion.
The governor was given instructions to make his dispositions as he thought fit to resist an invasion. As commander-in-chief he was given discretion to carry on resistance for as long as he considered to be in the interest of the Falkland Islanders. The Marines resisted and repulsed an attempt to seize Government House. There were casualties on the Argentine side. The order to cease fire was only given when the defenders were surrounded by overwhelming odds and further resistance would have caused needless loss of life to both the civilian and military population.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what exchanges, including those at an informal level, have taken place between Her Majesty's Government and that of the Argentine since the invasion of the Falkland Islands.
Following the severance of diplomatic relations, British interests in Argentina are represented by the Swiss embassy, which is in touch with the Argentine authorities as necessary on our behalf. In London the Brazilians are the protecting power for the Argentines. There have been no exchanges of substance between ourselves and the Argentines since the breaking of diplomatic relations, although we have been in touch about arrangements for respective embassy staff.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many British citizens are in the Falkland Islands; and what steps are proposed to ensure their safety.
The latest Falkland Islands census showed 1,723 British nationals and Commonwealth citizens resident in the islands. The safety of the islanders is of the highest priority to the British Government and all possible steps will he taken to assure their protection.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many residents of the Falkland Islands have the right of abode in the United Kingdom under the Immigration Act 1971.
Of the 1,800 residents of the Falkland Islands, about 1,400 have the right of abode in the United Kingdom. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department has given an assurance that no Falkland Islander, whether he has the right of abode or not, will have any difficulty over admission to this country.
Civil Service
Efficiency
asked the Minister for the Civil Service if she has been able to quantify the improvement in Civil Service efficiency since 1979.
Yes, wherever possible. Examples were given in the White Paper "Efficiency in the Civil Service"—Cmnd. 8293—and, as my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister told the House on January 28—[Vol. 16, c. 400]—savings from firm decisions on the programme of scrutinies introduced by Sir Derek Rayner have so far amounted to £130 million a year and £28 million once-for-all. We are also particularly concerned to remove underlying obstacles to efficiency by means of the programme of lasting reforms.
Education And Science
School Meals
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what proportion of children entitled to free school meals do not claim; and how much revenue is saved as a consequence.
Information is not available on the take-up rate of this benefit.
Micros In Schools (Training)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science (1) how many teachers received in-service training into the use of micros in schools in 1981; and how many he estimates will do so in 1982 and subsequent years;(2) if he is satisfied that there are sufficient teaching staff trained in information technology; and whether steps are at present being taken to encourage further training.
It is estimated that some 3,000 teachers attended short pilot courses of in-service training supported by the micro electronics education programme—MEP—during the financial year 1981–82. In each of the following years—1982–83 and 1983–84—11,000 teachers are likely to benefit from similar MEP schemes. Comprehesive information about the training arrangements made by local education authorities independently of the MEP is not centrally available, but the number of teachers receiving some form of training is likely to increase steadily as more schools purchase microcomputers subsidised by the Department of Industry. In 1981–82 at least two teachers from 1,500 schools received some training as a condition of participation in the micros in schools scheme, and this number is likely to be exceeded in 1982–83. Longer in-service training courses in polytechnics, colleges of higher education and universities, concerned with information technology and/or computer applications in schools., provided places for some 1,300 teachers in 1981–82; and a further 100 teachers attended DES short courses organised by Her Majesty's inspectorate. It is likely that the demand for such courses will increase, and, although my right hon. Friend has at present no plans to earmark additional resources, there is evidence that in-service training of this kind is already receiving a measure of priority from local education authorities. Government support through MEP will continue until 1984–85.
Information Technology
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he has had discussions about the extension of information technology into wider areas of the curriculum.
This is an important objective of the Government's microelectronics education programme sponsored by the DES, the Welsh Office and the Department of Education, Northern Ireland. The programme is concerned with ways of using the microcomputer as an aid to teaching and learning in a wide range of subjects as well as with the introduction of new elements in subjects such as electronics and craft design technology, in order that as many young people as possible become familiar with information technology and its applications. Consideration of this issue by local education authorities forms part of their responsibility for curriculum policy, and is likely to receive particular attention in 1982 as part of Information Technology Year.
Schoolchildren (Dependent Territories)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science, further to his reply to the hon. Member for Liverpool, Scotland Exchange, on 31 March, Official Report, c. 129, if he will publish in the Official Report the text of his Department's circular 1/81.
The text of the relevant annex is as follows:ANNEX THE ADMISSION TO MAINTAINED SCHOOLS OF CHILDREN FROM OVERSEAS AND THE ADMISSION OF TEACHERS FROM OVERSEAS1. This guidance replaces that given in Administrative Memorandum 4/73.Admission of Children from Overseas to Maintained Schools
Statutory Duties
2. Section 8 of the Education Act 1944 places a duty on every local education authority to secure the availability for their area of sufficient schools for providing primary and secondary education for all pupils. Section 6 of the Education Act 1980 places local education authorities and school governors under a duty to admit children to the school of their parents' choice except in specified circumstances (see paragraph 8 of the Circular). Section 36 of the 1944 Act places parents under a duty to cause their child to be educated by regular attendance at school or otherwise and section 37 of that Act places local education authorities under a duty to ensure that parents carry out their section 36 duty, by serving a school attendance order "if in the opinion of the authority it is expedient that (the child) should attend school". None of these duties is qualified so as to limit application to persons who are exempt from immigration control or who have been resident in the country for a particular length of time, or who have a particular status under the Immigration Rules.
3. Other statutory provisions which local education authorities (and governors where they are responsible for admissions) should bear in mind when considering applications for the admission of children from overseas are:
Admission of Children as Students*
4. Under the Immigration Rules a passenger may be admitted to this country as a student if he produces evidence to satisfy each of the following conditions:
5. As will be seen, local authority maintained schools are not among those listed in the Immigration Rules as qualifying a passenger for admission to this country as a student and it follows that a child who does not meet the requirements for entry in any other capacity will not be admitted as a student for studies at a maintained school. It will clearly be desirable to avoid a situation in which a passenger arrives in the United Kingdom expecting to enter on this basis and offers of places should not be made to children overseas. Where a child was given leave to enter as a student to attend an independent or private educational institution, the Home Office will not normally grant an extension of stay on transfer to a maintained school.
Admission of Children Accompanied by their Parents
a. Visitors
6. The circumstances in which children are admitted to this country with their parents as visitors (and as such are here for a limited stay) will obviously vary, as the parents may be here for a few days holiday or several months stay. Each application for admission will need to be considered on its merits in the light of the practicability of providing a place and the expediency of doing so (in terms of the educational welfare of the child). The likely length of stay of the child in this country will clearly need to be taken into account: under the Immigration Rules the maximum length of stay allowed to a visitor is one year.
7. The decision whether or not to admit a child to a maintained school is a matter for authorities (and governors where they are responsible for admissions) in the light of their statutory duties and subject to any decision by an appeal committee constituted under section 7 of the 1980 Act. However, should a complaint be made by parents to the Secretary of State that a child has been refused admission to a maintained school merely on the grounds that he was likely to be in the area for a short time (however that period may be defined), the Secretary of State would be bound to investigate the case on its merits and, if he was satisfied that the authority's or governors' action amounted to a failure to discharge a duty laid upon them, could direct that the child be admitted to a maintained school.
b. European Community (EC) Nationals
8. EC nationals are usually admitted to this country, without qualifications, for six months by means of a written notice (form IS120). They may then apply for a residence permit to remain in this country. When considering applications for the admission to a maintained school of a child accompanying EC nationals, therefore, LEAs will need to bear in mind that the length of stay in this country may be greater than the period shown on their own or their parents' notice. Where parents are employed in this country, the provisions of Article 12 of EEC Regulation 1612/68 will apply (see paragraph 3 above).
9. An EC child who seeks to come to this country in his own right to receive education has the same status as the children of other nationals (see paragraph 4 above), but is free to remain for employment if he wishes.
c. Others
10. Parents admitted to this country otherwise than as visitors (eg as students or to take up employment) can normally be expected to stay for longer than those admitted as visitors. Their duration of stay is therefore more likely to be such as to make the provision of education practicable and they may expect their child to be offered a place if they wish him to attend a maintained school. A parent has no entitlement to remain in the United Kingdom simply because his child is studying here and must qualify to remain in his own right under the Immigration Rules.
Approved Exchange Schemes
11. While, in general, overseas students are not admitted to this country to attend maintained schools, no objection is normally raised to students being admitted as visitors, within the meaning of the Immigration Rules, to attend a maintained school where this is under the auspices of a student exchange scheme. Such schemes should be agreed in advance by the local education authority. A student participating in an exchange scheme would normally be expected not to stay in this country for more than one year.
TEACHERS
12. Teachers from overseas, other than those who are nationals of EC countries, who wish to work in the United Kingdom need to hold a work permit issued by the Department of Employment relating to a specific post with a specific employer, before they can enter the country. However, members of religious orders engaged in teaching at establishments maintained by their order do not require work permits (although they must arrive in the United Kingdom in possession of an entry clearance issued for the purpose, and if they are to be otherwise engaged in teaching a work permit will be required). Additionally, work permits are not required for teachers and language assistants coming to schools in the United Kingdom under exchange schemes approved by the Central Bureau for Educational Visits and Exchanges or the League for the Exchange of Commonwealth Teachers, or for young Commonwealth citizens aged 17 to 27 who are seeking temporary posts which are incidental to a holiday in this country and who do not intend to stay more than two years. Generally speaking, persons admitted for temporary purposes (for example, visitors and students) will not be permitted to remain in employment.
* See paragraphs 8 and 9 for admission of European Community (EC) nationals.
Victoria And Albert Museum (Acquisition Fund)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what was the total sum of grants made available to local museums during the financial year ended 31 March from the fund for acquisitions by them which is administered by the Victoria and Albert museum and for which £1 million was provided in the Supply Estimates for 1981–82; and what was the unallocated balance, if any, standing on 31 March to the credit of the fund administered by the Victoria and Albert museum for the purpose of making grants towards acquisitions by local museums.
The total paid to local institutions during the financial year ending 31 March 1982 was £1,612,890. The balance in the fund on that date was £181,819, of which £61,313 was provisionally earmarked for particular grants. The sum available for payment in 1981–82 was £1,794,709, comprising the grant-in-aid of £1 million for that year, a balance of £787,914 carried over from the previous year in accordance with normal grant-in-aid practices, and a sum of £6,795 repaid during the year from grants previously made.
Objects In Lieu Of Tax
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he will specify the objects and property accepted in satisfaction of estate duty or capital transfer tax during the financial year ended 31 March; and if, in listing them, he will specify (a) the amount of tax
| Property accepted in lieu of tax | Amount of tax satisfied £ | Conditions as to destination |
| Two water-colours by J. M. W. Turner entitled respectively "Salisbury" and "Flint Castle" | 50,662 | None |
| Six drawings: | ||
| (i) The Dream of Human Life, a black chalk drawing by Michelangelo | 628,887 | Offer conditional on allocation to the Home House Society |
| (ii) Christ on the Cross, a black chalk drawing by Michelangelo | ||
| (iii) Landscape with Two Mules, a pen and ink drawing by Pieter Bruegel the Elder | ||
| (iv) Landscape with an Artist sketching, a pen and ink drawing by Pieter Bruegel the Elder | ||
| (v) Alpine Landscape, a pen and ink drawing by Pieter Bruegel the Elder | ||
| (vi) View of Antwerp from the Sea, a pen and ink drawing by Pieter Bruegel the Elder | ||
| Twenty-eight paintings: | ||
| Landscape by Frederick Lee | 53,277 | None |
| Landscape by Edmund Bristow | ||
| Lord Sefton, his brother and son by Richard Ansdell RA | ||
| Portrait of a dark bay horse outside a loose box by Richard Ansdell RA | ||
| Lord Sefton and his brother mounted by Richard Ansdell RA | ||
| Landscape by Richard Ansdell RA | ||
| Portrait of a member of the Molyneux family by Richard Ansdell RA | ||
| Landscape at Altcar by John Ferneley | ||
| Landscape by John Skeaping RA | ||
| Ghillie with a pony by Richard Ansdell RA | ||
| Boy with his dogs, by Richard Ansdell RA | ||
| Portrait of a member of the Molyneux family (English school) | ||
| A river landscape with a mill by Frederick Richard Lee RA | ||
| Portrait of the 6th Earl of Sefton by John A. Berrie | ||
| Jewel, a dark bay hunter by Frank Paton | ||
| Portrait of Hugh, 7th Earl of Sefton by W. Llewellyn | ||
| Portrait of Osbert, 6th Earl of Sefton by J. A. Berrie | ||
| A pair of portraits of young girls by J. C. Morre | ||
| A portrait of the Sefton children by Richard Ansdell RA | ||
| Portrait of Isabella, Countess of Sefton by John Russell RA | ||
| Portrait of the Countess of Sefton by A de Solome | ||
| Portrait of Hugh, 7th Earl of Sefton, by Philip de Lazslo | ||
| Portrait of Cecil Molyneux RN by Philip de Lazslo | ||
| Two views of a Scottish house and two landscape sketches by Richard Ansdell RA | ||
| Romantic river landscape with fisherman, by Barreth | ||
| Highland loch landscape by Frederick Richard Lee RA | ||
| The river Lyon by Frederick Richard Lee | ||
| Four studies of a stag's head by Richard Ansdell RA | ||
| A painting by Sir Anthony Van Dyck, 'The Betrayal of Christ' | 702,635 | Offer conditional on painting remaining in situ at Corsham Court, near Bath |
| A late fourteenth century English rectangular ivory diptych | 12,813 | None |
| Some 128 acres of marshland at Brightlingsea, in Essex | 60,955 | None |
| A framed watercolour by J. M. W. Turner depicting an Italian scene | 15,150 | None |
satisfied in each case, (b) whether any offers of objects accepted carried conditions as to destination and (c) the total of tax thus satisfied during the financial year in question.
Since 1 April 1981, with the agreement of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment, the following property has been accepted, in satisfaction of estate duty or capital transfer tax:
Transport
Cycle Tracks
9.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many miles of cycle track have been constructed by local authorities on disused railway track in the most recent period for which figures are available.
We do not maintain such records centrally, but a recent consultant's study commissioned by my Department has shown the scope for converting disused railway lines into cycle tracks. I hope that publication of the report will encourage more local authorities to take up this idea.
Headlights
16.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will introduce legislation to compel road users to drive with headlights at all times during the hours of darkness.
No. Headlights are already required at night where the street lighting is inadequate. I do not think motorists should be compelled to use headlamps in well-lit urban areas. The problems of dazzle and the reduction in street light effectiveness are being studied, but at present the decision to use headlamps in well-lit urban areas must be left to the judgment of the driver. If a driver is uncertain, then he will be well advised to use his dipped headlights.
Railways (Electrification)
18.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to make a statement on main line electrification.
As and when I am satisfied that the financial targets set out in the business plans are realistic, that the necessary productivity gains have been achieved and that the particular investments are worth while.
39.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he next expects to meet the chairman of British Railways to discuss further electrification.
I meet the chairman frequently to discuss this and other matters of mutual interest.
Road-Rail Freight Interchanges
20.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what representations he has received from, or discussions he has held with, the Association of Metropolitan Authorities about the future siting of major road-rail freight interchanges involving his Department; and whether he will make a statement.
I have seen the association's report on road and rail freight and I agree with it on the importance of coordination between local authorities, British Rail and industry on the development of road-rail interchanges. I understand that a working group set up by the association and British Rail is now studying this subject.
A564 (Blythe Bridge-Uttoxeter)
22.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he is satisfied with the progress of the preparatory work for the Blythe bridge to Uttoxeter section of the A564 Stoke to Derby link.
Yes. We expect to be ready to start construction before the end of the year.
London Transport (Fares)
23.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what further representations he has received about London Transport fares since the increase on 21 March.
I continue to receive correspondence and newspaper coupons about London Transport fares, which are a GLC responsibility, generated by the GLC's misleading propaganda campaign which has already cost ratepayers £250,000 and to which I understand it is now voting fresh sums.
26.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he plans to discuss the revised fares scheme with London Transport, following the change in the fares structure on 21 March.
London Transport fares are a matter for the London Transport Executive and the GLC; but I have made it clear that I deplore the increase in faxes which they have judged necessary to put London Transport's finances back into order following the follies and extravagance of the last few months. So that Londoners are not faced with further irresponsible cost rises and fare increases, I have asked the GLC to prepare a proper and well considered plan for London Transport that will make more effective and responsible use of the very considerable resources available to it.
32.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he last met the leader of the Greater London Council to discuss fare levels in London.
I met him on 8 January when the LT budget, approved by the GLC and from which the fare levels flow, was among the subjects discussed. I also met him on 8 March when I asked him to consider how, by adjusting services better to real need and by containing costs, it would be possible to reduce fares.
Seat Belts
24.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will seek to allow insurance industrial branch agents to be exempt from the seat belt provisions of section 27 of the Transport Act 1981 when they are collecting cash door to door in built-up urban areas.
In response to my statement of proposals for implementing compulsion, I have received comments from three organisations representing insurance agents and I am carefully considering their views, along with others I have received, before laying the necessary regulations before Parliament for approval.
Channel Tunnel
25.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to make an announcement on his policy towards the Channel tunnel.
29.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to make an announcement on his policy towards the Channel tunnel.
Next month.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many letters he has received on the subject of the Channel tunnel.
Over 1,100.
Vehicle Testing
27.
asked the Secretary of State, for Transport whether, in the light of two reports from the Transport Committee stating that no interested organisation has changed its fundamental opposition to the privatisation of testing and that the Committee believes that the present system within his Department should be retained, he will review his proposal to sell heavy goods vehicle testing stations to the private sector.
I have welcomed the Select Committee's valuable reports, and have taken up several of its recommendations. I have, however, no plans to modify my basic proposal to move the heavy goods vehicle testing stations out of the public sector.
M6 (Heysham)
28.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement about the M6 link to Heysham.
We have carefully considered the arguments for constructing a link road, but the scale of operations at Heysham and the amount of heavy traffic to and from the port are insufficient to justify trunk road status. There are seasonal traffic problems in the Lancaster and Morecambe areas, but these could be resolved by improvements to the existing local road network. Improvements to local roads are, of course, a matter for the local highway authority.
London Transport (Grants)
30.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what was the total amount of Government grants paid to London Transport in 1980–81 and 1981–82.
London Transport operates on a calendar year basis. The total amount of grants, including concessionary fare payments, paid to London Transport in 1980 was £229 million and in 1981 about £250 million, of which some £100 million came from the taxpayer through the transport supplementary grant and rate support grant system. In addition, London travellers benefited from some £150 million annual support to BR London and South-East services.
British Railways
31.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to nominate the chairman of the independent inquiry into British Railways' finances.
I hope to do so shortly.
38.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he next plans to meet the chairman of British Railways.
I meet the chairman from time to time and discuss a number of issues.
Road Construction (Private Funding)
33.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he has come to any decision on proposals for the private funding of roads; and if he will make a statement.
We are considering possible methods of tapping private finance for road building, but have not yet reached any decision.
Sealink Uk Ltd
34.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he is yet able to make a statement on his plans for the sale of Sealink UK Ltd.
Not at present. The Railways Board is in the lead in working out how to implement the policy, and I await its proposals.
Trunk Roads (Budget Underspend)
35.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what steps he is taking to avoid future repetition of the underspend of the 1981–82 trunk road construction budget.
We have added several schemes, mainly bypasses, to the programme and revived others on which work had been temporarily suspended. Both the main programme and the reserve list for the current two-year period are substantially larger, both in value and number of schemes, than were those for 1980 and 1981.
Central Line (Epping-Ongar)
36.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if there is to be a further public inquiry or hearing at which travellers and others will be able to put forward their objections before he makes any new decision on the future of the Epping-Ongar section of the Central Line.
In the event of closure proposals being made, the usual statutory procedures will be followed, which include a public hearing.
Roads (Condition)
37.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether there is any indication that there has been an overall deterioration in road conditions between 1980 and 1981.
The 1981 national road maintenance condition survey indicates a slight overall deterioration in road conditions between 1980 and 1981, but conditions have remained broadly constant over the last five years. The survey did not include the effects of the bad weather in December 1981.
41.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether the national road maintenance condition survey has demonstrated any increase in the level of defects for trunk roads since 1979.
The national road maintenance condition survey indicates a slight overall increase in the level of defects for trunk roads since 1979 but with no real change since the survey started in 1977. The latest report does not cover the effects of the recent spells of bad weather.
"Policy For Roads"
40.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what response he has had to the document "Policy for Roads: England 1981", Cmnd. 8496.
The replies received have generally been very favourable.
Roads (Construction)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he has made any estimate of the effects on employment of his road spending policies.
No. The number of workers needed for road construction varies greatly according to the characteristics of particular schemes. The indirect effects on employment elsewhere in the economy are even more difficult to quantify, but the Government's first priority for road investment is schemes which aid economic recovery and development.
Roads (Maintenance)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how the maintenance spending on local roads has varied in each year in real terms since 1973.
Figures for spending on local road maintenance—including lighting—in England in £ million at November 1979 prices are as follows:
| £ million | |
| 1973–74 | 660 |
| 1974–75 | 638 |
| 1975–76 | 623 |
| 1976–77 | 576 |
| 1977–78 | 554 |
| 1978–79 | 593 |
| 1979–80 | 578 |
| 1980–81 | 566 |
Driving Examination (Goole)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when a reply will be sent to the letter dated 22 February and addressed to the Under-Secretary of State by the hon. Member for Goole, and enclosing a further letter from one of the hon. Member's constituents about the conduct of a driving examination.
The reply to this letter was sent on 6 April.
Trunk Roads Programme
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when the English trunk road programme will be completed at current rates of expenditure.
I expect almost all the schemes in the current main programme and reserve lists to be completed or under construction by the end of the decade, and most schemes on which work has been temporarily suspended could also be started by the early 1990s. The programme is, however, subject to revision from time to time.
Motor Cycle Test
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if, with the ending of the RAC-ACU motor cycle scheme, he will introduce measures to encourage more training organisations to participate in part I of the new motor cycle test.
We agreed to make available to the British Motorcycle Safety Foundation a significant proportion of the £143,000 originally allocated for the payment of grant to the RAC in respect of motor cycle training during the current financial year. This will enable the foundation to help defray the initial expenditure of training organisations—including many former RACACU centres—which wish to take part in the new training and testing scheme.
National Express And National Holidays
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what progress he has made in setting a financial target for National Express and National Holidays.
I have today set the following financial target for the National Express and National Holidays divisions of the National Bus Company:
The achievement of this target will involve a significant improvement in real terms over the contribution achieved by National Express and National Holidays in 1981, which was itself a very substantial improvement on the 1980 result. The target thus represents a demanding objective for these two businesses, both of which operate in highly competitive markets. I am confident that the National Bus Company will make every effort to achieve it."A contribution to long run unavoidable costs of £7 million at outturn prices."
National Bus Company
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether the National Bus Company achieved its performance aim in 1981; what performance aim he has set for 1982; and if he will make a statement.
My predecessor announced on 22 May 1981—[Vol. 1, c. 201]—that he had set the National Bus Company a performance aim of a reduction in operating costs per vehicle mile of 3 per cent. in real terms in 1981. The company estimates that the actual reduction in its operating costs per vehicle mile last year was no less than 3·8 per cent. in real terms. Although this is still a provisional figure, it is clear that the company not only met but surpassed the challenging aim set for it. I am delighted to pay tribute to that achievement, which has been of great benefit to the travelling public.I have now agreed with the company that its performance aim for 1982 should be a further reduction in operating costs per vehicle mile of 1½ per cent. in re al terms. in the different circumstances of 1982 this, too, will present the company and its work force with a real challenge. I am sure that it will again do its utmost to meet it.
National Freight Company Ltd
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what was the total amount paid to the pension funds out of the proceeds of sale of the National Freight Company Ltd.
The proceeds of sale of the National Freight Company were £53·5 million. The total paid, as provided for under section 49 of the Transport Act 1980, to fund deficiencies in the NFC's pension schemes is £48,673,000. This total was made up of an immediate payment on sale of £47,297,000 and an adjustment to meet certain transfer payments not quantified at the date of sale but now settled of £1,376,000.
Environment
Property Services Agency
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether, in the light of the evidence given at the Old Bailey trial affecting Garry Harrison, former professional and technical officer with the Property Services Agency, and the allegations of bribery and corruption within this service made at the trial, he will set up a full and completely independent investigation into all aspects of the Property Services Agency, its officers, and the organisation which this agency replaced.
I take a serious view of corruption or alleged corruption in my Department. I am commissioning an independent review of the Property Services Agency's internal procedures for safeguarding against financial misconduct. I shall announce details shortly.
Homes Insulation
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will estimate the costs of providing grants for draught-proofing of doors and windows under the homes insulation scheme for dwellings which (a) have no loft insulation, (b) reach the standard specified by the homes insulation scheme and (c) have some insulation but less than that specified under the homes insulation scheme
It is not possible to estimate the costs of grant-aiding draught-proofing because the amount of work required varies widely with the state of repair of the dwelling and the types of doors and windows.
Local Authority Expenditure
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is his estimate of the total percentage of all local authority expenditure to be met by central Government grant during 1982–83 (a) in England and Wales, excluding Greater London and (b) in Greater London.
On the basis of preliminary expenditure estimates from block grant claim forms so far received block grant will meet about 30 per cent. of planned "total" expenditure—defined for block grant purposes—of London authorities in 1982–83 and about 47 per cent. of the planned total expenditure of English authorities outside London. These estimates are before any grant holdback. Grants to authorities in Wales are the responsibility of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales.It is not possible at this early stage in the financial year to calculate local authority expenditure outside the total expenditure definition used for block grant or to estimate grants other than block grant payable to authorities.
Woolwich Prison
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he expects to be able to announce the outcome of the public inquiry into the proposal to build a prison at Woolwich.
The inquiry into this proposal closed on 4 March and the inspector is currently preparing his report, which is likely to be submitted to my right hon. Friend later this month. A decision will be announced as soon as the report has been fully considered.
Housing Expenditure
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will give estimates of each individual figure for public expenditure on housing given in table 2.7 of Cmnd. 8494, "The Government's Expenditure Plans, 1982–83 to 1984–85," for 1982–83 for England at 1980 survey prices;(2) if he will give an estimate of the total housing public expenditure for England given in table 2.7 of Cmnd. 8494 for 1983–84 and 1984–85 at 1980 survey prices;3) if he will give an estimate of the cost of rent allowances and rent rebates, including rate fund contributions for 1982–83, at 1980 survey prices.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given on 31 March by my right hon. and learned Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer to the right hon. Member for Stepney and Poplar (Mr. Shore).—[Vol. 21, c. 124.]
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what are the latest available figures for the distribution of Exchequer subsidies for local authority housing, including and excluding rent rebates, and of tax relief plus option mortgage subsidy by income of head of household and wife, in a form comparable to the figures for 1974–75 given in "Housing Policy" technical volume 1, 1977, tables iv.36 and iv.37.
The latest available figures are for 1976–77 and are as follows. Figures for more recent years could be produced only at disproportionate cost.
| Estimate of full historic cost rents compared with rents (Net of rebate) paid: England and Wales 1976–77 | ||||
| Income of Household Head and Wife | Number of Households ('000) | Average full historic cost rent (£) | Average Subsidy (including rebate) (£) | Average Net Rent (£) |
| Under £1,000 | 580 | 387 | 274 | 113 |
| £1,000–£1,499 | 850 | 430 | 265 | 165 |
| £1,500–£1,999 | 550 | 458 | 247 | 211 |
| £2,000–£2,499 | 370 | 454 | 232 | 222 |
| £2,500–£2,999 | 410 | 472 | 253 | 219 |
| £3,000–£3,499 | 430 | 466 | 231 | 235 |
| £3,500–£3,999 | 440 | 474 | 227 | 247 |
| £4,000–£4,999 | 710 | 493 | 228 | 265 |
| £5,000–£5,999 | 400 | 515 | 235 | 280 |
| £6,000 and over | 210 | 517 | 242 | 275 |
| All incomes | 4,950 | 460 | 233 | 227 |
Estimate of mortgage payments gross and net of tax relief and option mortgage subsidy: England and Wales 1976–77
| ||||
Income of Household Head and Wife
| Number of Households ('000)
| Gross Payments £
| Tax Relief or Subsidy £
| Net Payments £
|
| Under £1,500 | 120 | 275 | 92 | 183 |
| £1,500–£ 1,999 | 120 | 308 | 108 | 200 |
| £2,0O0–£2,499 | 200 | 415 | 145 | 270 |
| £2,500–£2,999 | 330 | 367 | 130 | 237 |
| £3,000–£3,499 | 490 | 406 | 143 | 263 |
| £3,500–£3,999 | 620 | 448 | 158 | 290 |
| £4,000–£4,999 | 1,230 | 468 | 165 | 303 |
| £5,000–£5,999 | 840 | 570 | 201 | 369 |
| £6,000–£7,499 | 870 | 598 | 232 | 366 |
| £7,500 and over | 480 | 988 | 542 | 446 |
All incomes
| 5,300
| 528
| 207
| 311
|
Means-Tested Benefits
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish in the Official Report more recent figures on means-tested benefits than those for 1979 given in the reply to the hon. Member for Norfolk, North (Mr. Howell) on 1 December 1980, Official Report, columns 87–88.
I shall answer this question shortly.
Housing
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the incidence of poor or inadequate housing, as defined for the purposes of calculating grant from central Government to local authorities under the rate support grant formula, for each local authority in England.
The incidence of poor or inadequate housing is not an indicator used directly in the assessment of grant related expenditure. Estimates of the numbers of children under five in housing lacking amenities or overcrowded—indicator C7—and the numbers of elderly people in housing lacking amenities—indicator C14—are used in the assessment of grant related expenditure for the personal social services. In addition, use is made in the GRE components for several services of a standard index of relative housing and social conditions comprising eight separate indicators.For exact descriptions of the composition of these indicators, I refer the hon. Member to the "Rate Support Grant Report (England) 1982–83." For a description of the way in which the indicators are used in the assessment of GRE, I refer the hon. Member to the Department's publication "Grant Related Expenditure: How the Expenditure Needs of Local Authorities are assessed for Block Grant 1982–83". Copies of both documents are available in the library.I have placed in the Library figures showing the value of each of the indicators C7 and C14 for each authority.
Rescue Archaeology
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how much public money has been made available to rescue archaeology in each of the last 10 years.
My Department's grants for rescue archaeology for the years from 1976–77 are shown in the following table. Figures for earlier years are not readily available.
| Year | £ |
| 1976–77 | 1,902,000 |
| 1977–78 | 1,998,000 |
| 1978–79 | 2,566,000 |
| 1979–80 | 2,933,000 |
| 1980–81 | 3,656,000 |
| 1981–82 | *4,500,000 |
| * Estimate. | |
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how much from public funds has been spent in recording findings from State-funded archaeological digs; and if he will make a statement.
A total of £2,057,000 has been spent in post-excavation work and publication of findings from State-funded archaeological digs during the period from 1 April 1977 to 31 March 1982. Figures for earlier years are not readily available. This money is part of the total expenditure by my Department on rescue archaeology. It relates to work which is essential to complete the purpose of archaeological excavation; that is, preservation of the historical and archaeological environment either by preservation and protection in situ or by publication of excavation reports and storage or archives.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the current level of establishment in the Department of the Environment for archaeology and related matters; what is the establishment of bodies funded by the Department for the same purpose; and what is the total sum spent on salaries in each year for each body.
The Department's main input to archaeological work is carried out from within those 66 members of the inspectorate of ancient monuments and historic buildings who are engaged primarily on the wide range of work in connection with ancient monuments and their preservation. The work includes the giving of advice on scheduling and on monuments in the care of or grant - aided by the Department. Supervision of a programme of rescue archaeology undertaken by various outside bodies is also exercised within that group.Establishment numbers and costs of bodies in receipt of rescue excavation grants are not the responsibility of my right hon. Friend.
Park Court, Coventry
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when the dispute as to the liability for the repairs needed at the Inland Revenue premises, Park Court, Coventry, will be resolved.
It is not possible at present to indicate when the dispute as to liability for the repairs needed to Park Court, Coventry, will be resolved.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when the scaffolding now erected at the premises in Park Court, Coventry, and occupied by the Inland Revenue and the Department of Employment was placed in position; what, to date, has been the cost of hiring the scaffolding; what would have been the cost of purchasing the scaffolding at the date of erection; and when it will be removed.
The scaffolding was first placed in position in October 1979. The total cost of hire to date is approximately £57,000. We estimate it would have cost between £80,000 and £100,000 to purchase in 1979. It is not possible to say when it will be removed.
Public Health Act (Electrical Supply)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what representations he has received urging the making of the lack of an adequate or safe system of electrical supply a statutory defect under the Public Health Act; and what response he has made.
My right hon. Friend has received occasional representations about the lack of specific powers enabling local authorities to take action against defective electrical installations in houses. In particular, the Minimum Housing Standards Bill, which the hon. Member for Liverpool, Edge Hill (Mr. Alton) introduced in May 1981, sought to bring electrical wiring within the remit of the statutory nuisance provisions of the Public Health Act 1936. Authorities have powers under the Housing Acts to deal with disrepair in houses, and this could include defective electrical wiring. In particular, we extended the powers of authorities by the Housing Act 1980 to enable them to take action, following a representation, against defects which interfered materially with the personal comfort of an occupying tenant. My advice is that this power will enable authorities to deal with defective electrical wiring provided it is so far defective as to interfere materially with the tenant's personal comfort, including his safety and security.
Domestic Premises (Electric Wiring)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is his estimate of the number of homes in England and Wales which still retain rubber covered electrical cables or are otherwise in need of electrical rewiring.
I shall write to the hon. Member as soon as the information for England is available. The estimate for Wales is a matter for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales.
International Conference Centre
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he has concluded his negotiation on the financing of the international conference centre at Broad Sanctuary; and if he will make a statement.
The Government have now decided to finance the construction of this very specialised building from public funds. Whilst the detailed terms negotiated with the Pearl Assurance Company were in line with the offer, the Government concluded that, in view of the special nature of the building, this was a project more appropriately financed from public funds. Construction is now proceeding.
Liverpool (Property Development And Conservation)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what stage has been reached in his consideration of the compulsory purchase orders on properties in Ranelagh Street, Cases Street, Church Street, Parker Street, Clayton Square, Elliot Street and Charlotte Street initiated by the Liverpool city council following an agreement made by the city council and Wimpey Property Holding Developers; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 6 April, c. 321]: In January this year Liverpool city council made a compulsory purchase order on the land still required for a proposed redevelopment to provide a shopping and entertainments complex in this area. The council recently submitted it to me for confirmation, and it is at present under consideration by my Department. A large number of objections have been received, and before coming to a decision on confirmation I expect to order a public local inquiry to be held. I cannot, therefore, at this stage comment on the merits of the order.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how much partnership money has been spent on the rehabilitation of premises in Ranelagh Street and Church Street, Liverpool, and their environs; for what purposes; and when it was spent.
[pursuant to his reply, 6 April, c. 321]: In the Ranelagh Street-Church Street areas of Liverpool 10 projects totalling £115,000 have been funded through the Liverpool partnership in 1980–81 and 1981–82 to improve visual amenity. However, only one of these projects, for the improvement of the frontages of a number of shops at the junction of Church Street and Ranelagh Street, is within the area affected by the current Clayton Square redevelopment scheme and the related compulsory purchase order. The cost to the urban programme of works to these properties was £2,500.
House Of Commons
Select Committees
asked the Lord President of the Council if he will set out for each three-month period since March 1981 the number of meetings held by each departmental Select Committee and the number of pages of (a) evidence and (b) reports each has so far produced.
The information is as follows:
| 1 April—30 June 1981 | |||
| Committee | No. of meetings | Pages of evidence published | Pages of reports published |
| Agriculture | 10 | 203 | 6 |
| Defence | 15 | 357 | 45 |
| Education | 14 | 203 | — |
| Employment | 12 | 232 | — |
| Energy | 11 | — | — |
| Environment | 7 | 43 | — |
| Foreign Affairs | 10 | 112 | 23 |
| Overseas Development | |||
| Sub-Committee | 10 | 104 | N/A |
| Home Affairs | 11 | 72 | 14 |
| Sub Committee on Race | |||
| Relations and | |||
| Immigration | 12 | 145 | N/A |
Committee
| No. of meetings
| Pages of evidence published
| Pages of reports published
|
| Industry and Trade | 12 | 143 | 41 |
| Scottish Affairs | 11 | 221 | 7 |
| Social Services | 17 | 482 | — |
| Transport | 15 | 146 | 3 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 12 | 152 | 25 |
| Treasury and Civil Service Sub-Committee | 6 | 21 | N/A |
| Welsh Affairs | 5 | 265 | — |
1 July to 30 September 1981
| |||
Committee
| Number of meetings
| Pages of evidence published
| Pages of reports published
|
| Agriculture | 3 | 40 | 52 |
| Defence | 5 | 120 | — |
| Education | 9 | 67 | — |
| Employment | 4 | 40 | 2 |
| Energy | 9 | 426 | 15 |
| Environment | 3 | 27 | 88 |
| Foreign Affairs | 7 | 128 | 237 |
| Overseas Development | |||
| Sub-Committee | 4 | 37 | N/A |
| Home Affairs | 4 | 212 | 133 |
| Sub-Committee on Race | |||
| Relations and | |||
| Immigration | 4 | 21 | N/A |
| Industry and Trade | 3 | 141 | 6 |
| Scottish Affairs | 6 | 433 | — |
| Social Services | 5 | 445 | 18 |
| Transport | 3 | 333 | 34 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 5 | 366 | 35 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | |||
| Sub-Committee | 3 | 86 | N/A |
| Welsh Affairs | 5 | 86 | 74 |
1 October-31 December 1981
| |||
Committee
| No. of meetings
| Pages of evidence published
| Pages of reports published
|
| Agriculture | 6 | 24 | 5 |
| Defence | 7 | 139 | — |
| Education | 14 | 101 | 3 |
| Employment | 7 | 65 | 5 |
| Energy | 10 | 345 | 2 |
| Environment | 4 | 111 | — |
| Foreign Affairs | 9 | — | 17 |
| Overseas Development Sub-Committee | 6 | 31 | N/A |
| Home Affairs | 5 | 43 | 41 |
| Sub Committee on Race | |||
| Relations and | |||
| Immigration | 7 | 31 | N/A |
| Industry and Trade | 6 | 133 | — |
| Scottish Affairs | 4 | — | 48 |
| Social Services | 7 | 234 | 106 |
| Transport | 7 | — | — |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 7 | 80 | 5 |
| Treasury and Civil Service Sub-Committee | 9 | 91 | N/A |
| Welsh Affairs | 7 | 123 | — |
1 January-31 March 1982
| |||
Committee
| No. of meetings
| Pages of evidence published
| Pages of reports published
|
| Agriculture | 8 | 230 | — |
| Defence | 12 | 232 | 10 |
| Education | 11 | 147 | 104 |
| Employment | 9 | 138 | 5 |
Committee
| No. of meetings
| Pages of evidence published
| Pages of reports published
|
| Energy | 16 | 241 | 14 |
| Environment | 10 | 184 | — |
| Foreign Affairs | 9 | 138 | — |
| Overseas Development | |||
| Sub-Committee | 9 | 70 | N/A |
| Home Affairs | 9 | 140 | 1 |
| Sub Committee on Race | |||
| Relations and | |||
| Immigration | 4 | 89 | N/A |
| Industry and Trade | 12 | 201 | 17 |
| Scottish Affairs | 11 | 148 | — |
| Social Services | 14 | 313 | — |
| Transport | 10 | 193 | 5 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 12 | 16 | 4 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | |||
| Sub-Committee | 6 | 271 | N/A |
| Welsh Affairs | 11 | 197 | — |
asked the Lord President of the Council what is the average period that has elapsed from the publication of reports of the new Select Committee to the departmental response; and if he will give a breakdown of the average period elapsing relating to each of the new departmental Select Committees.
Details of the time elapsing between publication of individual Select Committee reports and of the departmental responses in Sessions 1979–8(1 and 1980–81 were given in reply to the right hon. Member for Taunton (Mr. du Cann) on 1 March.—[Vol. 9, c. 1–6] Details for the current Session to date are attached:
| Report | Date of Publication | Government Response |
| Agriculture | ||
| — | — | — |
| Defence | ||
| First | 19 March 1982 | |
| Education | ||
| First | 7 December 1981 | *1 February 1982 |
| Second | 16 February 1982 | |
| Third | 8 March 1982 | |
| Fourth | 15 March 1982 | |
| Employment | ||
| (to the First Report, Session 1980–81) 17 March 1982 *(to the Third Report, Session 1980–81) | ||
| 18 March 1982 | ||
| First | 15 December 1981 | |
| Energy | ||
| First | 16 February 1982 | No reply required |
| Second | 11 March 1982 | *1 April 1981 |
| Environment | ||
| — | — | — |
| Foreign Affairs | ||
| *(to the Seventh Report, Session 1980–81) | ||
| 15 February 1982 | ||
| First | 18 January 1982 | |
| Home Affairs | ||
| First | 15 December 1981 |
Report
| Date of Publication
| Government Response
|
Industry and Trade
| ||
| First | 4 March 1982 | |
| Second | 25 February 1982 | |
| Third | 1 March 1982 | |
Scottish Affairs
| ||
| First | 23 December 1981 | 19 February 1982 |
Social Services
| ||
Transport
| ||
| First | 11 March 1982 | No reply required |
Treasury and Civil Service
| ||
| First | 18 December 1981 | No reply expected |
| Second | 15 March 1982 | |
| Third | 1 April 1982 | |
Welsh Affairs
| ||
| — | — | — |
* Indicates the date on which the Committee received the response, which has not yet been published. | ||
asked the right hon. Member for Middlesbrough as representing the House of Commons Commission if he will list the number of temporary Select Committee assistants appointed for each of the departmental committees, their salary scales and the period for which they have been appointed.
Details of the temporary assistants that have so far been appointed to departmental Committees are given below:
| Select Committee | Number of Temporary Assistants |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 2 |
| Environment | 1 |
| Social Services | 1 |
| Education, Science and Arts | 1 |
| Transport | 1 |
Northern Ireland
Fluoridation
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will estimate the numbers for Northern Ireland of (a) children who are of an age where the health of their teeth may benefit from fluoridated water supplies living in areas where that water is fluoridated and (b) the number of persons over 16 years of age whose teeth cannot benefit.
Information on the numbers of children and adults in Northern Ireland living in areas where water is fluoridated is not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. The dental profession considers that all adults with natural teeth benefit to some extent from fluoridation of water supplies.
Terrorism
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (1) if he will list by date and address the terrorist type crimes committed in Northern Ireland in each of the past three years, to the latest available date;(2) if he will list by date and name and address in the
Official Report the persons who have been murdered by terrorists in Northern Ireland since 1 January 1969 to the latest available date; and where they died or where their bodies were found.
The information requested is not readily available in this form, and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. Some information on the more serious terrorist crimes is given in the annual reports by the Chief Constable, which are available in the House of Commons Library.
Rape
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will review the level of damages awarded in Northern Ireland to victims of rape in view of the fact that awards in these cases appear to be lower than those in other criminal injury cases.
I have no reason to believe that awards of compensation paid to victims of rape are disproportionate to awards made to other victims of criminal injuries. Applicants for criminal injuries compensation who are dissatisfied with the amount awarded may take the matter to the county court and ultimately to the High Court.
Nurses
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for Norfolk, North, 11 February, Official Report, column 419, regarding the total number of nurses employed by the National Health Service in Northern Ireland, if he will give further details of the factors which prevent him from making comparisons between years on a constant price basis.
As I explained in my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Norfolk, North, on 11 February, staging of some pay settlements makes comparisons on a constant price basis impossible from the information held centrally by the Department. Compiling such an analysis from data held by the health and social services boards could only be done at disproportionate cost.—[Vol. 17, c. 419.]
National Finance
Monetary Growth And Pay
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether there is a relationship between his recently announced guidelines of 8 to 12 per cent. monetary growth for 1982–83 and his 4 per cent. guideline for public sector pay.
The considerations underlying the 8 to 12 per cent. monetary growth target for 1982–83 are set out in the Financial Statement and Budget Report, published on 9 March 1982. The target is consistent with a growth in money GDP of 10 per cent. a year, which is in turn consistent with continued progress in reducing inflation and a strengthening of the recovery in the real economy. The public expenditure planning total of about £115 billion for 1982–83, also announced at Budget time, provides broadly for increases in the total sum available for public servants' pay from due settlement dates of 4 per cent. In turn, this total for public spending is intended to allow for a reduction in the PSBR in 1982–83 to about £9½ billion, which will allow the monetary target to be achieved while maintaining downward pressure on interest rates.
Tax Allowances
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would have been the saving in a full year if only the first £1,375 of the married man's tax allowance had been increased by 14 per cent. in the Budget; and how much of that saving would be attributable to non-pensioners.
The saving in a full year at 1982–83 income levels would be £410 million; this estimate also includes the yield from indexing only that part of the aged married allowance equivalent to the aged single allowance. It is not possible to distinguish non-pensioners, only those aged under 65; £360 million of the total saving would be attributable to this group.
"Economic Progress Report"
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, further to his written reply dated 23 March, Official Report, column 324–27, showing actual figures used in preparing charts in the January issue of "Economic Progress Report", whether he will publish in the Official Report the comparison of changes over successive cycles for the four sectors.
Comparisons of changes in output, employment and output per head over successive cycles for the four sectors within manufacturing shown in chart 5 of the January 1982 issue of the "Economic Progress Report" can be constructed using the data published in the relevant table—"Indices of Output, Employment and Productivity"—in back issues of the Department of Employment Gazette or alternatively in table 7.2 of the CSO's Monthly Digest of Statistics.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, further to his written reply dated 23 March, Official Report, column 324–27, showing the actual figures used in preparing the charts in the January issue of "Economic Progress Report", whether he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the increases in manufacturing productivity in the last 12 months on the index weights of production in the third quarter of 1981 for the sectors contained in the index instead of the 1975 weights.
Figures showing the increase in manufacturing productivity, based on weights of production in the third quarter of 1981, are not available.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, further to his written reply dated 23 March, Official Report, c. 324–27, showing the actual figures used in preparing charts in the January issue of "Economic Progress Report", whether he will now publish in the Official Report(i) the index weight of iron and steel in the metals figures and the output, and so on, figures for this part of the industry and (ii) the aggregate figures for known profits or losses of the main chemical companies over this period in respect of their United Kingdom operations.
The index weights of, and loss of production in, the ferrous metal manufacturing industries—the most detailed breakdown within the metals sector for which production data are published—are shown in table 7.1 of the CSO's Monthly Digest of Statistics. Employment figures for the ferrous metal manufacturing industries can be constructed by adding together the employment figures for iron and steel—general—steel tubes and iron castings, as published in the Employment Gazette. A series for output per head in ferrous metal manufacturing is not available, but can be constructed from the output and employment series. This would not, however, be entirely consistent with the published output per head series for metal manufactures published in the Employment Gazette—table 1.8—since the production series for ferrous metal manufacture is not adjusted for changes in the level of stocks.A broad measure of the aggregate profits and losses in the main chemical companies can be found in present and past issues of "Business Monitor PA 1000, Report on the Census of Production" published by the Business Statistics Office. Table 1 of that publication gives gross value added and wage and salary costs in the chemical and allied industries. The difference between these two series gives profits in those industries. The series are based on information provided by the major chemical companies, though some adjustment is made for the smaller companies.
Unit Labour Costs And Prices
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, further to his written reply dated 24 March, Official Report, c. 191–93, concerning output per head for the total working population, whether he will publish in the Official Report figures for each quarter since the second quarter of 1979.
A series for output per head, obtained by dividing the output measure of gross domestic product by estimates of the average working population—that is the employed labour force plus the registered unemployed, other than adult students—during each quarter, is provided in the following table:
| (1975=100, seasonally adjusted) | |
| Whole economy: Output per head of working population | |
| 1979 | |
| 2nd quarter | 109·9 |
| 3rd quarter | 108·0 |
| 4th quarter | 108·8 |
| 1980 | |
| 1st quarter | 108·1 |
| 2nd quarter | 106·6 |
| 3rd quarter | 104·9 |
| 4th quarter | 103·5 |
| 1981 | |
| 1st quarter | 103·3 |
| 2nd quarter | 103·3 |
| 3rd quarter | 103·8 |
Sources:
Derived from Employment Gazette, March 1982, and Central Statistical Office estimates of gross domestic product, issued by press notice on 22 March 1982.
Places Of Worship
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether, in view of the fact that places of worship belonging to the Exclusive Brethren are now being valued for rates assessments, he will set out the guidelines for such valuations adopted by valuation officers working for the Inland Revenue.
The Lands Tribunal ruled in 1980 that two meeting halls occupied by the Exclusive Brethen could not be said to be places of public religious worship, and were therefore rateable. In those cases and in the cases of other halls where the facts are broadly analogous the valuation officer is applying the normal principles of rating valuation to assess the rateable values.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish the criteria by which valuation officers determine whether premises certified as places of religious worship are used as places of public worship.
Where a property is certified as a place of religious worship it is a question of fact whether it is used for public worship. However, in considering that question the valuation officer has regard to decisions of the courts.
Capital Taxation
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will set out the proportion of Government revenue derived from capital taxation in each year since 1970–71 and including an estimate for 1982–83.
Following is the information:
| A | B | ||
| Capital Taxation | Government Revenue | A as a percentage of B | |
| £ million | £ million | ||
| 1970–71 | 591 | 15,843 | 3·7 |
| 1971–72 | 673 | 16,932 | 4·0 |
| 1972–73 | 763 | 17,178 | 4·4 |
| 1973–74 | 941 | 18,226 | 5·2 |
| 1974–75 | 926 | 23,570 | 3·9 |
| 1975–76 | 849 | 29,417 | 2·9 |
| 1976–77 | 865 | 33,778 | 2·6 |
| 1977–78 | 912 | 38,773 | 2·4 |
| 1978–79 | 923 | 43,088 | 2·1 |
| 1979–80 | 1,105 | 54,331 | 2·0 |
| 1980–81 | 1,227 | 66,213 | 1·9 |
| 1981–82* | 1,651 | 76,288 | 2·2 |
| 1982–8† | 1,370 | 82,895 | 1·7 |
| * Estimated Outturn | |||
| †Forecast | |||
Life Assurance (Taxation Relief)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will bring up to date the information on life assurance taxation relief given in the reply dated 19 December 1979, Official Report, c. 210–11, to the hon. Member for Grimsby.
The reply referred to related to the year 1978–79. Since 1979–80, life assurance relief has been obtained by deduction on payment of the premium by the individual and no information on the distribution of relief by income range is available. The total cost of the relief in a full year at 1982–83 income levels is estimated at £600 million.
Import Duties
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, further to the written reply dated 23 March, Official Report, c. 328, concerning duties levied on imports of manufactures from non-EEC countries, whether he will publish in the Official Report his best estimate for the further reduction in the average rate of duty for each section which can be expected as a result of the Tokyo round assuming that the pattern of trade remains the same and the reductions are fully implemented.
At the Tokyo round of the GATT there was agreement to tariff changes for a multiplicity of goods. To calculate the effect on the average rate of duty on United Kingdom imports for each section of the Standards International Trade Classification would cost disproportionate time and effort.
Civil Service
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what proportion of civil servants receive annual increments, as distinct from rises in salaries.
About 45 per cent. of all non-industrial civil servants are due to receive an increment in this financial year.
Company Car Taxation
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he considered applying the principles he announced on 26 March, Official Report, c. 425, on company car taxation to Ministers of the Crown, top civil servants, former Prime Ministers, top police officers, officers of the Army, the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force, judges and other public servants; and if he is satisfied that these groups of public servants do not benefit unfairly from their present access to free car services.
The same principles are applied in the tax treatment of cars used by Ministers and other public servants as to employees generally. No tax is charged on the use of pooled cars by public servants or other employees if the conditions in section 65, Finance Act 1976 are met.
Contingencies Fund
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list in the Official Report, the amount of the Contingencies Fund in each financial year since he took office, together with the purposes for which it has been used in each year and the amounts allocated for each purpose; what is the level of the Contingencies Fund for the financial year 1982–83; what commitments have already been set against it; and whether there has been any change in policy in connection with the use of the fund during the present Government.
Under the Contingencies Fund Act 1974 the capital of the Contingencies Fund shall not at any time exceed an amount equal to 2 per cent. of the authorised Supply expenditure for the previous financial year. This amount, the purposes for which the fund has been used, and the amounts used, are given in the following table. Gross advances from the fund during a year as a whole may be greater than the capital limit. This is because sums repaid to the fund may be re-used, provided the limit is not exceeded at any one time. The audited accounts for 1979–80 were published on 16 April 1981—HC 300—and those for 1980–81 on 5 April 1982—HC 261. The annual accounts contain further details of transactions during the year.The limit on the capital of the fund at any one time in 1982–83 is £1·526 million. Advances outstanding on 1
| 1979–80 | 1980–81 | *1981·82 | |
| Limit on the capital of the Fund at any one time | 937 | 1,093 | 1,355 |
| The purposes for which the Fund has been used are as follows: | |||
| 1. In anticipation of votes of Parliament | |||
| (a) to meet expenditure in excess of the amount granted in the Vote on Account | 36 | 333 | 90 |
| (b) to meet expenditure during the Vote on Account period on new services for which provision has been made in the original Estimate | — | 16 | — |
| (c) to meet expenditure on unforeseen new services | 17 | 19 | 84 |
| (d) to meet expenditure in excess of the provision on those subheads which may not be financed from savings on other subheads† | 34 | — | — |
| (e) to meet further expenditure on existing services when the cash provision on the Vote is exhausted† | 216 | 633 | 385 |
| (f) to meet expenditure to be financed ultimately from receipts pending the accrual of those receipts | — | 11 | 32 |
| (g) to finance working balances over the turn of the financial year | 138 | 128 | 179 |
| (h) To meet stamp duties remitted in respect of public departments etc, and other expenses | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2. In anticipation of revenue (if repayments and other expenditure on a particular day exceed receipts) | |||
| Customs and Excise | 790 | 1,077 | 1,494 |
| Inland Revenue | 73 | 569 | 352 |
| Total | 1,305 | 2,787 | 2,617 |
| * Provisional | |||
| † The definitions of categories (d) and (e) to some extent overlap and, where this has occurred, advances have been attributed to the more relevant category. | |||
Mortgage Interest Relief
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will provide an estimate (a) of the total cost of tax relief on mortgage interest payments for 1982–83 for England at both expected outturn prices and 1980 survey prices and (b) of the cost per mortgagor and per owner-occupied dwelling for 1982–83 at outturn and 1980 survey prices.
Provisional estimates in cash terms are as follows:
| Tax relief for mortgage interest, England, 1982–83 | ||
| Total Cost | Cost per mortgagor receiving tax relief | Cost per owner-occupied dwelling |
| £ million | £ | £ |
| 1950 | 375 | 190 |
April 1982 were £181·2 million. Of this £178·4 million were advances to finance departmental working balances over the turn of the financial year, £2·3 million was in respect of a payment to the budget of the European Communities, about which a statement was made to Parliament by the Lord Privy Seal on 3 February 1982—[Vol. 17, c. 305]—and the remainder was for expenditure in excess of voted provision in 1981–82 for which Parliament will be asked to approve excess votes in due course.
There has been no change in policy in connection with the use of the Contingencies Fund during the present Government
Imf Loans (Developing Countries)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what steps have been taken by the International Monetary Fund in the past six months to tighten conditionality lending to developing countries; and in particular what is the policy of Her Majesty's Government towards the terms to be offered to Costa Rica by the fund.
The International Monetary Fund last reviewed its conditionally guidelines in 1979 and there has been no formal change in the fund's emphasis on the need for conditionally in the six months since the last annual meetings. The interim committee in September 1981 stressed the need for strong and comprehensive adjustment policies in order to reduce the present unsustainable current account imbalances. Although many developing countries have made substantial adaptations, further progress is needed. In this context, it is noteworthy that where programmes have been most successful, the adjustment has been brought about in an orderly way through the early adoption of policy measures.It is not the practice of Her Majesty's Government to comment on negotiations between member States and the fund itself. The Government will, however, give careful consideration to any programme agreed with Costa Rica at such time as is is brought before the executive board.
Nationalised Industries
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement about revised external financing limits for the nationalised industries for 1982–83 following his announcement in the Budget speech that these would be reduced to take account of the cut in the national insurance surcharge.
The revised external financing limits for the nationalised industries in 1982–83 are set out in the following table. The amendments include certain changes in addition to those consequent upon the national insurance surcharge reduction. These include reductions in the external financing limits for British Rail, as already announced by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Transport on 4 March, to take account of an overrun in 1981–82 now expected to be £40 million following recent industrial action by ASLEF; for the National Coal Board to take account of delayed sales from 1981–82; and for the Scottish electricity boards following the closure of the Invergordon aluminium smelter. The adjustment for British Airways also reflects lower repayment requirements in respect of the special severance facility granted in 1981–82.
| Industry | 1982–83 External Financing Limit £ million |
| National Coal Board | 962 |
| Electricity (England and Wales) | -243 |
| North of Scotland Hydro-Electric Board | 9 |
| South of Scotland Electricity Board | 211 |
| British Gas Corporation | -83 |
| British National Oil Corporation | -85* |
| British Steel Corporation | 350† |
| British Telecom | 320 |
| Post Office and Girobank | -38 |
| British Airways Board | -8 |
| British Airports Authority | 47 |
| British Railways Board | 897 |
| British Transport Docks Board | -7 |
| British Waterways Board | 39 |
| National Bus Company | 69 |
| Scottish Transport Group | 20 |
| British Shipbuilders | 123 |
| * The British National Oil Corporation figure is an external financing requirement, and does not represent a formal limit. | |
| † The £350 million figure published at the time of the Budget is still provisional and subject to review in the light of final decisions on the industry's Corporate Plan. The effect of the NIS reduction should be to reduce the industry's external financing needs by £7 million. This will be taken into account when the final EL is set. | |
| Public Corporation | 1982–83 External Financing Limit (£ million) |
| Water Authorities (England and Wales) | 414·5 |
| Urban Development Corporations | 63·8 |
| Civil Aviation Authority | 30·9 |
Taxation (Enforcement)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many people have been employed on tax evasion and fraud work by the Inland Revenue in each year since 1975; what was the average amount consequently recovered per person employed in each year; and what was the total cost of this work for the years in question.
[pursuant to his reply, 1 April 1982, c. 163]: The detection of tax evasion forms part of the normal duties of the majority of the staff and most of the tax recovered, including interest and penalties, arises from investigation carried out in local offices. the following table relates only to the specialised investigation units and sets out: a. the numbers of staff employed in those units as at 31 October each year. The present total is approximately 340; b. the approximate average yield per person employed in those units for the years ending 31 October.
| Year ended 31 October | ||
| a. | b. £000's | |
| 1976 | 251 | 41 |
| 1977 | 268 | 88 |
| 1978 | 269 | 88 |
| 1979 | 279 | 109 |
| 1980 | 297 | 141 |
| 1981 | 321 | 173 |
Energy (Tax Incentives)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what financial incentives there are in the taxation system to encourage people to use renewable energy and energy conservation systems.
[pursuant to his reply, 6 April 1982, c. 289.]: Capital expenditure on new energy systems for business purposes normally qualifies for the 100 per cent. first-year allowance which applies to machinery and plant generally.The cost of adding any insulation against loss of heat to an existing industrial building also qualifies for a special 100 per cent. first-year allowance.
Government Expenditure (Scotland)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish in the Official Report tables analysing (a) the £67 million classification and public sector borrowing requirement neutral change on programme 15, Scotland, shown in column 3 of table 4.7 of Cmnd. 8494, "The Government's Expenditure Plans 1982–83 to 1983–84," (b) the difference between the £5,956 million revised cash plan for programme 15, Scotland, for 1982–83 announced on 2 December 1981 and the £5,920 million shown on table 4.7 of Cmnd. 8494 and (c) the difference between Her Majesty's Government's estimate of £5,855 million given in December 1981 as the Cmnd. 8175 provision for 1982–83 revalued into cash and the £5,956 million given on that date as the revised programme.
I have been asked to reply.
I shall write to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
Wales
Roads (Construction And Maintenance)
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will publish in the Official Report a comparison between the cash budget and the actual cash spent for (a) motorway and trunk road construction, (b) motorway and trunk road
| Road construction, improvement and maintenance, Wales | ||||||
| £ million cash | ||||||
| 1976–77 | 1977–78 | 1978–79 | 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | |
| CENTRAL GOVERNMENT | ||||||
| Motorways and Trunk Roads* | ||||||
| New construction and improvement | ||||||
| 1. Planned expenditure | 60 | 59 | 62 | 64 | 82 | 94 |
| 2. Actual expenditure | 59 | 46 | 51 | 63 | 81 | ‡88 |
| 3. Shortfall (-)/Excess (+) as percentage of 1 | -2% | -22% | -18% | -2% | -1% | -6% |
| Road maintenance† | ||||||
| 1. Planned expenditure | 8 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 17 |
| 2. Actual expenditure | 7 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 11 | ‡20 |
| 3. Shortfall (-)/Excess (+) as percentage of 1 | -13% | — | +50% | +20% | — | +18% |
| LOCAL AUTHORITY BIDS | ||||||
| New construction and improvement* | ||||||
| 1. Planned expenditure | 24 | 28 | 40 | 47 | 54 | 50 |
| 2. Actual expenditure | 29 | 27 | 34 | 43 | 50 | ║46 |
| 3. Shortfall (-)/Excess (+) as percentage of 1 | + 21% | -4% | -15% | -9% | -7% | -8% |
| Road maintenance† | ||||||
| 1. Planned expenditure | 36 | 34 | 38 | 44 | 52 | 70 |
| 2. Actual expenditure | 31 | 37 | 44 | 48 | 53 | ¶ |
| 3. Shortfall (-)/Excess (+) as percentage of 1 | -14% | +9% | +16% | +9% | +2% | |
| * Including lighting installation. | ||||||
| † Including lighting maintenance, snow clearing and gritting. | ||||||
| ‡ Provisional outturn. | ||||||
| ║ This represents the Department's estimate of outturn, based on local authority returns. For 1981–82 local authorities were given the freedom to switch capital provision between roads and their other services. | ||||||
| ¶ Not yet available. | ||||||
Employment (Gwynedd)
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what representations he has received concerning the employment situation in Gwynedd over the past three months.
My right hon. Friend received memoranda from Arfon borough council and Gwynedd county council, which formed a basis for his meeting with local authorities in the area on 17 February. Since then a letter from Dwyfor district council on 10 March drew attention to local economic circumstances, as did the hon. Member's letter of 5 March. maintenance, (c) local authority road construction and (d) local authority road maintenance for each year since 1976–77, with the latest estimate for 1981–82, showing in each case the percentage under or over spend; and if he will make a statement on the reasons for any differences between the estimated outturn for 1981–82 and the budget provision.
The information is estimated to be as follows:
Job Creation
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is his estimate of the number of jobs (a) created and (b) lost in Wales since May 1979; and if he will list them in the travel-to-work areas.
Comprehensive information is not available. Information on the net change m employment levels is best obtained from the estimates of the number of employees in employment compiled by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Employment and published on a regular basis in the Employment Gazette. These estimates indicate that between June 1979 and September 1981—the latest available figure—there was a decrease of 113,000 in the number of employees in employment in Wales. Comparable figures are not available at the local level.
Industry (Financial Assistance)
asked the Secretary of State for Wales whether, when making decisions on public funding of sensitive areas of industry such as the furniture industry, he will take into full account any adverse effects on firms in the same industrial sector which do not receive any aid from public funds.
The Welsh Office is responsible for determining applications for regional selective assistance under section 7 of the Industry Act 1972. To qualify for this type of assistance projects must contribute some net economic benefit to the regional and national economy. The effect which projects are likely to have on existing United Kingdom producers is taken into account in assessing whether or not they satisfy this criterion.
Public Bodies (Funding)
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will make it his practice to inform hon. Members in advance of members of the public of any substantial change in his policy on the funding of public bodies.
This is my invariable practice.
Welsh Development Agency
asked the Secretary of State for Wales when he took his decision to increase the finances available to the Welsh Development Agency; and what programme is to be cut back in order to cover this increase.
The finances available to the Welsh Development Agency for 1982–83 were decided in the course of the 1981 public expenditure survey and were published in the Supply Estimates of 9 March. There has been no increase since that date.
Under-Fives
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is the total population of children under 5 years of age in each local authority with social services responsibilities in Wales.
The information is as follows:
| Local Authority | Population aged under five years of age (Thousands) |
| Clwyd | 23·1 |
| Dyfed | 18·5 |
| Gwent | 26·0 |
| Gwynedd | 13·5 |
| Mid Glamorgan | 35·3 |
| Powys | 6·2 |
| South Glamorgan | 23·3 |
| West Glamorgan | 22·0 |
District Health Authorities
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will publish a table showing the revenue cash limits and the capital cash limits for district health authorities in Wales for 1982–83; and how these compare with 1981–82.
The provisional revenue and capital cash limits for health authorities in Wales for 1982–83 and their equivalent cash limits for 1981–82 are as follows:
| Table 1 | ||
| Revenue and capital limits for district health authorities 1982–83 | ||
| District health authority | Revenue cash limits (provisional) £ million | Capital cash limits (provisional) £ million |
| Clwyd | 62·123 | 0·992 |
| East Dyfed | 39·230 | 0·624 |
| Gwent | 79·011 | 1·256 |
| Gwynedd | 35·760 | 0·568 |
| Mid Glamorgan | 89·000 | 1·416 |
| Powys | 18·332 | 0·296 |
| South Glamorgan | 106·889 | 1·680 |
| West Glamorgan | 61·180 | 0·968 |
| Pembrokeshire | 12·724 | 0·200 |
| Total | 504·249 | 8·000 |
| Revenue and Capital Cash Limits for Area Health Authorities 1981–82 | ||
| Area health authority | Revenue cash limits (provisional) £ million | Capital cash limits (provisional) £ million |
| Clwyd | 59·000 | 0·750 |
| Dyfed | 48·043 | 0·618 |
| Gwent | 73·235 | 0·942 |
| Gwynedd | 33·047 | 0·426 |
| Mid Glamorgan | 82·904 | 1·068 |
| Powys | 16·929 | 0·216 |
| South Glamorgan | 98·475 | 1·254 |
| West Glamorgan | 56·532 | 0·726 |
| Total | 468·165 | 6000 |
Notes:
i. The cash limits for 1982–83 reflect the reorganisation of health services in Dyfed which came into effect on 1 April 1982.
ii. The capital cash limits are those which are allocated to health authorities for their discretionary use. Authorities receive other capital funds on a non-discretionary basis for such purposes as energy conservation and they also benefit from the all-Wales capital programme of upper category schemes which is managed centrally by the Welsh Office.
iii. Provisional—that is, beginning of the year—figures have been given in respect of both years for ease of comparison, because the end of year cash limits for 1981–82 are complicated by supplementary allocations during the course of the year as a result of the release of revenue funds from central reserves for health service developments and the recycling of capital funds following periodic reassessments of expenditure on the all-Wales capital programme and by transfers of funds by health authorities between their revenue and capital allocations.
iv. The increase in the capital cash limits between the two years incorporates additional provision which has been made available for authorities discretionary—that is, lower category—schemes so as to facilitate an increase in the delegated limit for such schemes from £600,000 to £1 million in accordance with the recommendations of a "Rayner"review.
Day Nurseries
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is the percentage of social service day nursery places available per thousand children under 5 years of age in each local authority in Wales with social services responsibility.
The information requested is as follows for 31 March 1981:
Rate per 1,000*
| ||||||||
Places provided by local
| Other places
| Places with childminders
| Total
| |||||
Full care
| Sessional care
| Full care
| Sessional care
| Full care
| Sessional care
| Full care
| Sessional care
| |
| Clwyd | 0·6 | — | 8·2 | 166·0 | 15·7 | — | 24·5 | 166·0 |
| Dyfed | — | 8·2 | — | 136·6 | 11·8 | 9·3 | 11·8 | 154·1 |
| Gwent | 3·3 | — | 0·3 | 79·4 | 6·6 | — | 10·2 | 79·4 |
| Gwynedd | — | — | 3·0 | 161·6 | 11·0 | — | 14·0 | 161·6 |
| Mid Glamorgan | — | 3·4 | 3·6 | 61·6 | 13·9 | 3·3 | 17·5 | 68·2 |
| Powys | — | — | 1·6 | 175·2 | 81 | 182·7 | 9·7 | 357·9 |
| South Glamorgan | 1·2 | — | 15·3 | 125·2 | 27·1 | — | 43·6 | 125·2 |
| West Glamorgan | 1·3 | — | 0·7 | 33·0 | 5·0 | — | 7·0 | 33·0 |
| WALES | 0·9 | 1·6 | 4·4 | 104·3 | 13·0 | 8·5 | 18·4 | 114·4 |
* Places available per 1,000 children aged under five. | ||||||||
Signle Patents
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is the incidence of single parents in each local authority with social services responsibility in Wales.
The information is contained in table 39 of the "Welsh Housing and Dwelling Survey", a copy of which is in the Library.
| Indicators of Poor Housing used for the 1982–83 RSG Distribution (Welsh Counties) | |||
| Persons lacking sole use of basic amenities | Under-18s in poor housing conditions | Pensioners lacking sole use of basic amenities | |
| Per cent. | Per cent. | Per cent. | |
| Clwyd | 3·70 | 3·06 | 0·55 |
| Dyfed | 6·20 | 3·96 | 0·89 |
| Gwent | 7·20 | 5·65 | 0·98 |
| Gwynedd | 6·10 | 5·48 | 1·05 |
| Mid Glamorgan | 12·90 | 10·42 | 1·43 |
| Powys | 7·30 | 5·22 | 0·97 |
| South Glamorgan | 7·60 | 4·91 | 0·81 |
| West Glamorgan | 7·10 | 5·18 | 0·89 |
Source: "Welsh Housing and Dwelling Survey 1978–79".
Indicators of Poor Housing used for the 1982–83 RSG distribution (Welsh Districts)
| ||
Persons lacking use of basic amenities
| Households lacking sole use of basic amenities (1971)
| |
(per cent.)
| (number)
| |
| Alyn and Deeside | 2·70 | 2,525 |
| Colwyn | 3·00 | 1,840 |
| Delyn | 3·40 | 3,155 |
| Glyndwr | 5·70 | 2,335 |
| Rhuddlan | 0·50 | 1,445 |
| Wrexham Maelor | 4·00 | 5,250 |
| Carmarthen | 10·00 | 3,859 |
| Ceredigion | 5·60 | 4,525 |
| Dinefwr | 7·70 | 3,365 |
| Llanelli | 5·30 | 6,055 |
| Preseli | 2·60 | 2,883 |
| South Pembroke | 5·70 | 2,163 |
| Blaenau Gwent | 10·20 | 7,616 |
| Islwyn | 12·40 | 5,886 |
Housing
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is the incidence of poor or inadequate housing, as defined for the purposes of calculating grant from central Government to local authorities under the rate support grant formula, for each local authority in Wales.
The 1982–83 grant-related expenditure formula for both counties and districts incorporates indicators reflecting poor housing conditions. The values of these indicators for each authority are as follows:
| Persons lacking use of basic amenities (per cent.) | Households lacking sole use of basic amenities (1971) (number) | |
| Monmouth | 3·50 | 2,765 |
| Newport | 3·50 | 7,915 |
| Torfaen | 5·20 | 4,980 |
| Aberconwy | 3·70 | 2,385 |
| Arfon | 6·40 | 4,415 |
| Dwyfor | 7·50 | 2,335 |
| Merionnydd | 5·20 | 2,315 |
| Ynys Mon | 4·00 | 3,770 |
| Cynon Valley | 18·40 | 9,585 |
| Merthyr Tydfil | 17·10 | 8,166 |
| Ogwr | 7·30 | 7,820 |
| Rhondda | 22·90 | 15,205 |
| Rhymney Valley | 900 | 9,018 |
| Taff-Ely | 7·80 | 6,360 |
| Brecknock | 5·60 | 2,660 |
| Montgomery | 7·60 | 3,995 |
| Radnor | 8·00 | 1,470 |
Persons lacking use of basic amenities (per cent.)
| Households lacking sole use of basic amenities (1971) (number)
| |
| Cardiff | 6·20 | 21,630 |
| Vale of Glamorgan | 3·00 | 4,920 |
| Afan | 8·90 | 3,715 |
| Lliw Valley | 5·40 | 5,435 |
| Neath | 6·20 | 6,239 |
| Swansea | 6·10 | 13,065 |
Notes:
1. The number of persons in households lacking the use of one or more basic amenities is expressed as a percentage of the general population. Source: "Welsh Housing and Dwelling Survey 1978–79".
2. The number of households lacking sole use of basic amenities in 1971 is taken from the 1971 census.
Community Nurseries
asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many community nurseries exist in Wales; and in which local authorities.
There is no agreed definition of the term community nursery. Information on places provided by each authority in Wales has been given to the hon. Member today in reply to a separate question.
Grosvenor Chater Paper Mill
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if, consequent upon receiving the deputation of management and labour in Mold, Clwyd, recently, of Grosvenor Chater paper mill, Greenfield, Holywell, he will make a statement concerning the efforts made to keep the mill open and to find a buyer for the establishment.
My Department is continuing its discussions with the company and has indicated its willingness to consider a request for financial assistance from any potential purchaser.
Welsh Water Authority
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will now appoint to membership of the Welsh water authority persons to represent the interests of the county and district councils for areas served by the authority.
asked the Secretary of State for Wales when he expects to announce the names of the four local authority members of the Welsh water authority.
In seeking nominations for the four persons to represent the interests of the counties and districts covered by the Welsh water authority, I have been concerned to ensure that the interests of the whole area covered by the Welsh water authority, including the English part, are properly represented. In considering the names submitted to me by the local authority associations, therefore, it has been my duty to ensure a reasonable geographical spread among the local authority representatives, both in Wales and in that part of England in which the authority is responsible for water services. I have been concerned also to ensure that both districts and counties are equally represented.I have concluded that the names submitted to me, while providing a satisfactory spread of representation in Wales itself, do not adequately meet the commitment to representation for that part of England which is most concerned, the county of Hereford and Worcester.
In order that the newly reconstituted authority may begin its work with as close as possible to a full complement of local authority representatives, I now intend to offer appointment to the following persons nominated by the county and district councils:
- Councillor J. C. Espley, JP—Clwyd county council
- Councillor. J. D. A. Thompson, JP—Radnor district council
- Councillor G. Jones—Afan borough council
One vacancy, therefore, remains to be filled, and I have invited the Association of County Councils to nominate urgently a suitable person from Hereford and Worcester to represent the interests of the English counties concerned. Should a suitable candidate not emerge, I shall make an appointment after consulting the Hereford and Worcester county council.
Scotland
Fluoridation
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland, further to the reply of 18 March, Official Report, column 160, if he will estimate the numbers for Scotland of (a) children who are of an age where the health of their teeth may benefit from fluoridated water supplies living in areas where that water is fluoridated and (b) the number of persons over 16 years of age whose teeth cannot benefit.
Information on the number of children living in areas where the water is fluoridated is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. Expert dental opinion is that the benefit of fluoride to the teeth of children and adults is continuous.
Roads
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he has studied the statement contained in the Strathclyde regional council's transport policies and programme submission that reducing allocations aggravate a deteriorating condition of highways and structures; if he has any evidence that reduced road maintenance budgets have led to deteriorating roads in the regions; and if he will authorise an increased maintenance budget for Strathclyde.
I am aware of the regional council's view. My right hon. Friend took account in the Rate Support (Scotland) Order 1982 of local authority concern on this matter and of the priority given to road maintenance by authorities in previous years. It is for Strathclyde regional council to determine local priorities in the light of the settlement and of other relevant factors.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland to what extent his road construction policy objectives take account of greater distances in Scotland than in the rest of the United Kingdom.
My right hon. Friend's objective is to carry out a balanced programme of trunk road and motorway construction and improvement, taking full account of the distances involved as well as of other relevant factors, such as the need for bypasses. The programme always contains a proportion of work on the main long distance strategic routes.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what recent representations he has received about the condition of trunk and local roads.
My right hon. Friend has received a small number of representations from members of the public about the condition of local roads, and some local highway authorities have expressed concern in their transport policies and programmes submissions about the level of resources available for road maintenance. He has received no recent representations relating to trunk roads.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish in the Official Report a
| 1976–77 | 1977–78 | 1978–79 | 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | ||
| Motorways and Trunk Roads | |||||||
| New Construction and Improvements | |||||||
| Cash Budget | £ million | 43·5 | 58·2 | 61·3 | 64·0 | 75·9 | 92·7 |
| Actual Expenditure | £ million | 43·8 | 57·5 | 58·6 | 68·0 | 72·2 | *72·1 |
| Under/overspend | Percentage | +0·7 | -1·2 | -4·4 | +6·2 | -4·9 | -22·2 |
| Maintenance | |||||||
| Cash Budget | £ million | 10·9 | 12·1 | 13·1 | 15·4 | 14·5 | 24·5 |
| Actual Expenditure | £ million | 10·7 | 12·3 | 14·1 | 15·1 | 17·7 | *29·8 |
| Under/overspend | Percentage | -1·8 | + 1·7 | +7·6 | -1·9 | +22·1 | +21·6 |
| Local Authority Roads and Transport | |||||||
| Capital Expenditure | |||||||
| Capital Allocation†‡ | £ million | 75·6 | 77·1 | 94·6 | 102·6 | 106·6 | 131·7 |
| Actual Expenditure† | £ million | 69·3 | 67·6 | 93·0 | 103·7 | 93·8 | *125·8 |
| Under/overspend | Percentage | -8·3 | -12·3 | -1·7 | + 1·1 | -12·0 | -4·5 |
| Actual Expenditure (new construction and improvement of roads) | £ million | 42·0 | 39·1 | 46·8 | 62·8 | 63·9 | Not available |
| Maintenance (Roads) Actual Expenditure** | £ million | 41·1 | 61·7 | 57·1 | 63·3 | *90·9 | Not available |
Notes:
* Provisional outturn
†Includes public transport
‡Capital allocations are not split between roads and public transport
** Cash budget figures are not available on the same basis
1981–82 Outturn
The underspend of about £20 million in 1981–82 on new construction of motorways and trunk roads has been mainly caused by the very keen contract prices which have been obtained, compared with the forward estimate and by delays resulting from the severe weather during December and January. Some large schemes were also unexpectedly delayed by procedural difficulties, but this was partly offset by bringing forward some additional but smaller schemes. A sum of £5 million was transferred within the overall roads cash block to allow additional expenditure on essential maintenance and to cover the additional cost of snow clearing during the severe winter. The net underspend for the cash block is therefore £15 million or 13·3 per cent. As regards the local authority figures, the reasons for any difference between budgeted and actual expenditure are a matter for the individual local authorities.
Local Authority Expenditure
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish in the Official Report an analysis for the years 1976–77 to 1982–83 of the diffence between local authority expenditure in Scotland as shown in table 2.15.1 of Cmnd. 8494, "The Government's Expenditure Plans
| Current Expenditure | |||||||
| £ million cash | |||||||
| 1976–77 | 1977–78 | 1978–79 | 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | |
| Agriculture, fisheries, food and forestry | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Industry, energy, trade and employment | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Housing benefit | 17 | 33 | 31 | 37 | 41 | 64 | 75 |
| Total current expenditure | 25 | 41 | 39 | 44 | 49 | 73 | 83 |
comparison between the cash budget and the actual cash spent for (a) motorway and trunk road construction, (b) motorway and trunk road maintenance, (c) local authority road construction and (d) local authority road maintenance for each year since 1976–77, with the latest estimate for 1981–82, showing in each case the percentage under or overspend; and if he will make a statement on the reasons for any differences between the estimated outturn for 1981–82 and the budget provision.
The information requested is as follows:1982–83 to 1984–85", and local authority expenditure within programme 15, Scotland, included within table 2.15 of Cmnd. 8494.
The following tables set out the expenditure contained in table 2.15.1 of Cmnd. 8494 that is not included in Table 2.15. There is no local authority expenditure in table 2.15 that is not included in table 2.15.1.
Capital Expenditure
| |||||||
£ million cash
| |||||||
1976–77
| 1977–78
| 1978–79
| 1979–80
| 1980–81
| 1981–82
| 1982–83
| |
| Industry, energy, trade and employment | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 |
| Transport | 12 | 16 | 15 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 2 |
| Total capital expenditure | 12 | 16 | 15 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish in the Official Report breakdowns of table 2·15 of Cnmd. 8494, "The Government's Expenditure Plans 1982–83 to 1984–85", showing (a) an analysis by spending authority and (b) an analysis by economic category within spending authority, showing the same analysis as in table 1·12.
| (a) Total Expenditure within Specretary of State's Responsibility by Sending Authority (£ million) | |||||||
| 1976–77 | 1977–78 | 1978–79 | 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | |
| Central Government | 1,285 | 1,400 | 1,586 | 1,947 | 2,393 | 2,639 | 2,768 |
| Local Authority | 1,678 | 1,755 | 2,008 | 2,378 | 2,788 | 2,985 | 3,188 |
| Certain Public Corporations | 97 | 79 | 84 | 99 | 111 | 97 | 107 |
| Total* | 3,060 | 3,234 | 3,679 | 4,423 | 5,292 | 5,722 | 6,062 |
| * Because of rounding, totals may not corresond exactly to sums of their parts. | |||||||
| Total expenditure within the Secretary of State's responsibility by spending authority and economic category £ million cash | |||||||
| 1976–77 | 1977–78 | 1978–79 | 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981·82 | 1982–83 | |
| Central Government | |||||||
| Currrent: | |||||||
| Goods and services | 712 | 809 | 926 | 1,097 | 1,404 | 1,612 | 1,730 |
| Subsidies and grants | 420 | 382 | 420 | 555 | 645 | 587 | 569 |
| Capital: | |||||||
| Goods and services | 98 | 109 | 121 | 141 | 150 | 201 | 211 |
| Grants | 56 | 94 | 118 | 151 | 194 | 233 | 246 |
| Net lending to nationalised industries and some other public corporations | — | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 12 |
| Other net lending and capital transactions | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Total excluding debt interest etc. | 1,285 | 1,400 | 1,586 | 1,947 | 2,393 | 2,639 | 2,768 |
| Local Authority | |||||||
| Current: | |||||||
| Goods and services | 1,086 | 1,179 | 1,383 | 1,615 | 1,983 | 2,090 | 2,297 |
| Subsidies and grants | 75 | 87 | 102 | 143 | 192 | 200 | 188 |
| Capital: | |||||||
| Goods and services | 495 | 462 | 484 | 574 | 561 | 606 | 586 |
| Grants | 14 | 17 | 28 | 24 | 25 | 41 | 49 |
| Net lending and other capital transactions | 8 | 10 | 12 | 23 | 28 | 58 | 67 |
| Total excluding debt interest etc. | 1,678 | 1,755 | 2,008 | 2,378 | 2,788 | 2,985 | 3,188 |
| Certain Public Corporations | |||||||
| Capital: | |||||||
| Goods and services | 84 | 72 | 72 | 75 | 79 | 86 | 78 |
| Grants | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net lending and other capital transactions | 13 | 6 | 13 | 25 | 32 | 11 | 29 |
| Total | 97 | 79 | 84 | 99 | 111 | 97 | 107 |
| Total expenditure on programmes | 3,060 | 3,234 | 3,679 | 4,423 | 5,292 | 5,722 | 6,062 |
Note:
Because of rounding, totals may not correspond exactly to sums of their parts.
Decisions about the allocation of expenditure in the later years have not been made in sufficient detail for these analyses to be extended beyond 1982–83. The information for the years 1976–77 to 1982–83 is as follows:
Unemployment Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the current (a) total and (b) male unemployment rate for Scotland; and what were the corresponding rates for May 1979.
The information is set out in the following table:
| Unemployment percentage rate for Scotland (seasonally adjusted) | ||
| March 1982 | May 1979 | |
| Male | 16·2 | 8·4 |
| Total | 13·7 | 7·4 |
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is (a) the total number and (b) the number of men unemployed in Kilmarnock; what percentage unemployment rates they represent; and what were the corresponding figures for May 1979.
The information is set out in the following table:
| Numbers registered as unemployed in Kilmarnock (not seasonally adjusted) | ||
| March 1982 | ||
| Total | Percentage | |
| Male | 4,863 | 23·2 |
| Total | 6,984 | 19·5 |
| May 1979 | ||
| Total | Percentage | |
| Male | 1,909 | 9·0 |
| Total | 2,937 | 8·1 |
Under-Fives
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the total population of children under 5 years of age in each local authority with social services responsibilities in Scotland.
Provisional estimates, which make use of the results of the 1981 Census, are given in the following table:
| Population under 5 Years of Age at 30 June 1981 | |
| (thousands) | |
| Borders | 5·5 |
| Central | 16·9 |
| Dumfries & Galloway | 8·3 |
| Fife | 21·6 |
| Grampian | 30·4 |
| Highland | 13·7 |
| Lothian | 42·0 |
| Strathclyde | 148·8 |
| Tayside | 22·7 |
| Orkney | 1·2 |
| Shetland | 1·8 |
| Western Isles | 20 |
| Scotland | 315·1 |
Council House Sales
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he has received the report on the progress of council house sales in East Lothian district following the recent public inquiry; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend has received the inquiry report and it is now being considered.
Day Nurseries
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the percentage of social service day nursery places available per thousand children under 5 years of age, in each local authority in Scotland with social services responsibility.
The information requested is as follows:
| Regional Islands Authority | Local Authority Day Nursery places available per thousand children under five years of age |
| Borders | — |
| Central | 21·8 |
| Dumfries and Galloway | — |
| Fife | — |
| Grampian | 9·5 |
| Highland | 0·4 |
| Lothian | 22·1 |
| Strathclyde | 11·1 |
| Tayside | 23·2 |
| Orkney | — |
| Shetland | — |
| Western Isles | 2·9 |
| Scotland | 12·0 |
Single Parents
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the incidence of single parents in each local authority with social services responsibility in Scotland.
This information is not at present available, but I shall let the hon. Member have it as soon as it is to hand.
Housing
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the incidence of poor or inadequate housing, as defined for the purposes of calculating grant from central Government to local authorities under the rate support grant formula for each local authority in Scotland.
The incidence of poor or inadequate housing is not part of the calculation of rate support grant payable to local authorities in Scotland. The present method of distributing grant is set out in the Rate Support Grant (Scotland) Order 1982.
Community Nurseries
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many community nurseries exist in Scotland; and in which local authorities.
The term "community nursery" is not one which is commonly used in Scotland, and it could be taken to apply to a number of different facilities provided for children under five. If the hon. Member could be more specific about the type of facility that he has in mind I shall ascertain whether the information that he requests is available.
Forestry Commission
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) what is the total estimated net gain, or loss, each year over the next decade, of planted Forestry Commission land in Scotland, taking the proposed planting and harvesting programmes in Scotland into account;(2) what is the current area of Forestry Commission plantations in Scotland; what proportion of this area is covered by mature forest; what is the projected total area under plantation in Scotland over the next 10 years; and what proportion of this total is intended to be covered by mature forest;(3) what is the current capital value of
(a) land in Scotland owned by the Forestry Commission and (b) the trees on Forestry Commission plantations in Scotland;
(4) if he will publish in the Official Report details of the Forestry Commission's new planting programme in Scotland for each year over the next decade;
(5) what is the Forestry Commission's harvesting programme in Scotland over the next decade in terms of volume; and what the value will be in cash terms at current prices;
(6) how many employees were employed in Scotland by the Forestry Commission in 1970, 1975, 1980, and at the most recent available date; and if he will categorise them by type of work;
I shall reply to the right hon. Member as soon as possible.
Water And Sewerage Services
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is his estimate of the total annual cost of rate support grant in Scotland which is associated with Scottish local authorities' expenditure on water and sewerage services.
I refer the hon. Member to the report on the Rate Support Grant (Scotland) Order 1982—HC 143 of the 1981–82 Session—which explains that rate support grant is paid in aid of the revenues of local authorities generally and is not hypothecated to individual services. Appendix B to the report lists the breakdown of relevant expenditure by main service for 1982–83 at estimated cash prices.
Social Services
Blind Persons
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many persons were registered as blind in 1979, 1980 and to the nearest available date in 1981.
The number of people who were registered by local authorities in England as blind in 1979 and 1980 were
| Year ending March 1979 | 105,270 |
| Year ending March 1980 | 107,765 |
Abortions
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will take steps to ensure that women are able to obtain a therapeutic termination of a pregnancy under the National Health Service in all areas of the United Kingdom with equal facility and convenience.
The level of provision of abortion facilities is for health authorities to decide in the light of local needs and priorities and the availability of resources.
Family Income Supplement
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many persons in Devon are in each of the 16 occupational categories into which family income supplement recipients are divided.
I regret that the information requested is not available. My hon. Friend may, however, find it helpful to know that, at 29 December 1981, the latest date for which figures are available, there were about 132,000 recipients of family income supplement in Great Britain. The following table shows the breakdown by occupational category. About 11,000 of the 132,000 were in the former DHSS South West region, but I am unable to say how many in the region were in each category.
| Occupational Category | Number |
| 1 Agricultural | 11,000 |
| 2 Industry (heavy) | 3,000 |
| 3 Industry (light) | 10,000 |
| 4 Craftsmen | 3,000 |
| 5 Textile and clothing | 4,000 |
| 6 Food and drink trades | 3,000 |
| 7 Construction and building | 4,000 |
| 8 General unskilled, warehousemen and packers | 17,000 |
| 9 Drivers, transport and communication | 11,000 |
| 10 Clerical and office | 15,000 |
| 11 Shop assistants and sales | 12,000 |
| 12 Catering, domestic and cleaners | 22,000 |
| 13 Service, sport and recreation | 5,000 |
| 14 Nurses | 1,000 |
| 15 Administrators, social, professional and technical | 9,000 |
| 16 Others | 2,000 |
| TOTAL | 132,000 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what proportion of those eligible for family income supplement are estimated not to claim their entitlement; and how much family income supplement, in money terms, is not claimed as a result.
The latest official estimate and an analysis of the take-up of family income supplement, including an estimate of the amount thought to be unclaimed, were published by the Department in "The Take-up of Family Income Supplement: Note on the estimate derived from the Family Finances Survey" on 6 July 1981. Copies of this note were placed in the Library of the House.The family finances survey was conducted over the period of 12 months from October 1978 to September 1979. In the succeeding periods of 12 months, the numbers of awards rose substantially, as the following table shows:
| Period | Number of FIS awards | Percentage increase in second and third periods compared with the first |
| 1. October 1978 to September 1979 | 73,520 | — |
| 2. October 1979 to September 1980 | 89,440 | 21·6 |
| 3. October 1980 to September 1981 | 123,540 | 68 |
Health Service Price Index
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish the Health Service price index used by his Department, indicating the index's movements over the last five years, and the basis on which the index is calculated.
The Health Service price index is produced monthly by the Department. It is based on the pattern of non-staff expenditure in the hospital and community health service. The HSPI is made available to health authorities and is sent to other interested bodies on request. A copy is placed each month in the Library of the House. The index has been improved and modified since it was introduced in November 1976 when it superseded the hospital prices index.
Benefits
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what delays continue to exist in the payment of benefits, especially child benefit, as a result of industrial action in Newcastle; and if he will make a statement.
None, as far as I am aware. If the hon. Member has a particular case in mind, perhaps he will let me have details.
Heart Stimulators
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will take steps to make batteries for heart stimulators available on prescription.
No. The batteries form an integral part of a cardiac pacemaker and usually last about six to seven years. If a pacemaker should fail for whatever reason it would be removed and replaced, complete with batteries, free of charge to the patient.
Fuel-Direct Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he is now in a position to give details of the changes to the fuel-direct scheme that he has agreed with the fuel industries and which were announced by the Under-Secretary of State for Energy on 29 March, Official Report, c. 25.
My right hon. Friend today laid the necessary amendments to the Supplementary Benefit (Claims and Payments) Regulations before the House.It has long been a source of concern to us that some fuel boards have maintained limits on the size of debt which they were prepared to accept for fuel-direct, so increasing the risk of disconnections among poor people dependent on supplementary benefit. I am pleased to confirm that, as part of a package of changes, the fuel industries have now agreed to remove the remaining limits.Under the fuel-direct scheme deductions within specified limits can be made from a claimant's supplementary benefit and paid direct to the fuel authority where it appears to the benefit officer to be in the interests of the claimant and his family. The deduction normally consists of two amounts: one to clear outstanding debts and the other to cover current fuel consumption.The deduction for outstanding debts is limited to 5 per cent. of the single householder rate—currently £1·20—for each of a gas debt and an electricity debt. Under the new regulations claimants who come on to fuel-direct from the date at which the regulations come into force will, provided they only have one fuel debt, have 10 per cent. of the single householder rate—£2·40 a week—deducted from their benefit rather than £1·20 as at present. This will enable the debt to be cleared sooner.Provision is, however, made so that if a second debt arises this doubled deduction will be halved. In this way the maximum total deduction that can be made for outstanding fuel debts is not increased. The regulation also provides that existing fuel-direct cases should not be subject to the doubled deduction, even if they have only one fuel debt.In respect of a deduction for current consumption, the regulations provide more flexibility by enabling it to be periodically adjusted upwards or downwards to take account of any credit or further debt that has accrued as a result of unforeseen fluctuations in the claimant's pattern of fuel consumption.The rule whereby total fuel deductions cannot exceed 25 per cent. of the claimant's basic benefit without the claimant's agreement will continue to apply.We are making these regulations now as a matter of urgency to assist in putting the changes into effect as soon as possible so that the new provisions may help with large fuel bills resulting from the past winter. The Social Security Advisory Committee has been kept informed about our consultations with the fuel boards. It has for some time been pressing for the removal of fuel boards' debt limits and it wishes to see this done with all possible speed. It recognises the need for an urgent change in the regulations and has asked that the regulations be referred to it as soon as they have been made.We shall be monitoring the effect of these changes to see whether any further improvements to fuel-direct need to be made in due course.
Under-Fives
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the total population of children under 5 years of age in each local authority with social services responsibilities in England.
The latest official set of estimates for such local authorities, relating to mid-1980, has been published in table 5 of "Population Estimates, 1980"—HMSO, Series PP1 No. 5. However, the results of the 1981 census of population, which are now being published, show that the estimates need to be revised. A new set of estimates based on the census results and relating to mid-1981 will be available in the autumn.
Benefit Claimants
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, for each of his Department's local offices serving the Coventry North-East constituency, the current number of non-pensioner and pensioner claimants; and if he will give comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981 where available.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, for each of his local offices serving the Birmingham, Erdington, constituency, the current number of non-pensioner and pensioner claimants; and if he will give comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981 where available.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report for each of his Department's local offices serving the Birmingham, Ladywood constituency the current number of non-pensioner and pensioner claimants; and if he will give comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981 where available.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, for each of his Department's local offices serving the Coventry South-East constituency, the current number of non-pensioner and pensioner claimants; and if he will give comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981 where available.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, for each of his Department's local offices serving the Birmingham, Small Heath constituency, the current number of non-pensioner and pensioner claimants; and if he will give comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981 where available.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report,for each of his Department's local offices serving the Coventry, North-West constituency, the current number of non-pensioner and pensioner claimants; and if he will give comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, for each of his Department's local offices serving the Birmingham, Stechford constituency, the current number of non-pensioner and pensioner claimants; and if he will give comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981 where available.
I shall let the hon. Members have a reply as soon as possible.
Departmental Staff
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, each of his Department's local offices serving the Coventry, North-East constituency, the current number of persons employed; and if he will give where available the comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981.
The information requested is as follows:
| Number of staff at offices dealing with the Coventry North-East Constituency | ||||
| Office | 1 April 1982 | 1 April 1981 | 1 April 1980 | 1 April 1979 |
| Coventry (East) ILO | 231 | 233 | 236 | 251 |
| Coventry (West) ILO | 172 | 171 | 168 | 182 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, for each of his Department's local offices serving the Birmingham, Erdington, constituency, the current number of persons employed; and if he will give, where available, the comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981.
The information requested is as follows:
| Number of staff at offices dealing with the Birmingham, Erdington Constituency | ||||
| Office | 1 April 1982 | 1 April 1981 | 1 April 1980 | 1 April 1979 |
| Erdington | 163 | 193 | 179 | 191 |
| Perry Barr | 117 | Not open | Not open | Not open |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, for each of his Department's local offices serving the Birmingham, Ladywood, constituency, the current number of persons employed; and if he will give where available the comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981.
The information requested is as follows:
| Number of staff at offices dealing with the Birmingham, Ladywood Constituency | ||||
| Office | 1 April 1982 | 1 April 1981 | 1 April 1980 | 1 April 1979 |
| Edgbaston | 178 | 152 | 153 | 161 |
| Handsworth | 197 | 236 | 223 | 244 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, for each of his Department's local offices serving the Coventry South-East constituency, the current number of persons employed; and if he will give, where available, the comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981.
The information requested is as follows:
| Number of staff at offices dealing with the Coventry South-East constituency | ||||
| Office | 1 April 1982 | 1 April 1981 | 1 April 1980 | 1 April 1979 |
| Coventry (East) ILO | 231 | 233 | 236 | 251 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, for each of his Department's local offices serving the Birmingham, Small Heath constituency, the current number of persons employed; and if he will give, where available, the comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981.
The information requested is as follows:
| Number of staff at offices dealing with the Birmingham, Small Heath constituency | ||||
| Office | 1 April 1982 | 1 April 1981 | 1 April 1980 | 1 April 1979 |
| Bradford Street | 62·5 | 59 | 58 | 66 |
| Handsworth | 197 | 236 | 223 | 244 |
| Number of staff at offices dealing with the Birmingham, Stechford constituency | ||||
| Office | 1 April 1982 | 1 April 1981 | 1 April 1980 | 1 April 1979 |
| Erdington | 161 | 193 | 179 | 191 |
| Washwood Heath | 130 | 159 | 182 | 195 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, for each of
| Number of staff at offices dealing with the Birmingham, Perry Barr constituency | ||||
| Office | 1 April 1982 | 1 April 1981 | 1 April 1980 | 1 April 1979 |
| Perry Barr* | 117 | Not open | Not open | Not open |
| Erdington | 163 | 193 | 179 | 191 |
| Handsworth | 197 | 236 | 223 | 244 |
| * Opened October 1981. | ||||
Office
| 1 April 1982
| 1 April 1981
| 1 April 1980
| 1 April 1979
|
| Ladywood | 164 | 139 | 140 | 153 |
| Sparkhill | 95 | 98 | 99 | 106 |
| Washwood Heath | 130 | 159 | 182 | 195 |
The figures for 1 April 1982 reflect the number of staff employed on that date. Comparable information is not available for earlier years and details supplied are of the number of staff authorised to cope with the work loads then current.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, for each of his Department's local offices serving the Coventry North-West constituency, the current number of persons employed; and if he will give, where available, the comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981.
The information requested is as follows
| Coventry North-West constituency | ||||
| Office | 1 April 1982 | 1 April 1981 | 1 April 1980 | 1 April 1979 |
| Coventry (West) ILO | 172 | 171 | 168 | 182 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now list in the Official Report, for each of his Department's local offices serving the Birmingham, Stechford constituency, the current numbers of persons employed; and if hr will give, where available, the comparable figure for 1979, and 1981.
The information requested is as follows:his Department's local offices serving the Birmingham, Stechford constituency, the current numbers of persons employed; and if he will give, where available, the comparable figure for 1979, 1980 and 1981.
:[pursuant to his replay, 30 March 1982, c 93]: The information requested is as follows:
The figures for 1 April 1982 reflect the number of staff employed on that date. Comparable information is not available for earlier years and details supplied are of the number of staff authorised to cope with the work loads then current.
Free Welfare Milk
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what proportion of those families entitled to free welfare milk on low income grounds do not claim it; and how much revenue is saved as a result.
The total number of people in the United Kingdom claiming free milk on low income grounds rose from 16,600 in 1977 to 29,630 in 1980, an increase of nearly 80 per cent. Up-to-date statistics on the number of potential beneficiaries are, however, not available at present and it is therefore not possible to provide a reliable estimate of the proportion of families not claiming it.
Supplementary Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish a more recent estimate for the take-up of supplementary benefit than that published by the Supplementary Benefits Commission for 1979 indicating (a) what proportion of those entitled to supplementary benefit do not claim and (b) how much supplementary benefit in money terms is not claimed as a result.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Brighton, Kemptown (Mr. Bowden) on 5 April 1982.—[Vol. 21, c. 247–50.]
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will give the latest figures for the number of unemployed people receiving supplementary benefit, the number of these heading families, and the number of children in such families; and if he will give separate figures for one and two-parent families and for individuals and heads of one and two-parent families unemployed for more than one year.
In December 1981, about 1.3 million unemployed people were receiving supplementary benefit*. I regret that more specific information for December 1981 is not yet available; the latest available detail remains that given to the right hon. Member by my hon. Friend, the Member for Wallasey (Mrs. Chalker) on 21 December 1981.—[Vol. 15, c. 295.]
* Source: DHSS Quarterly Statistical Enquiry, December 1981.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will give the number of exceptional circumstances allowances and exceptional needs payments made during the first year of the amended supplementary benefit scheme; if he will categorise these according to the status of the recipient and according to the purpose of the allowance or payment; and if he will give comparable figures for the last year of the old scheme.
I regret that information relating to the first year of the new supplementary benefit scheme will not be available until later in the year when the results of the Department's annual statistical enquiry have been processed.Information relating to 1980 is available in tables 34.44, 34.45 and 34.97 of "Social Security Statistics 1981", which is available in the Library.
Prescription Charges
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what proportion of those entitled to exemption from prescription charges on grounds of low income do not apply for exemption; and how much revenue is saved as a result.
It is not known how many people might be entitled to exemption on grounds of low income. Some people with entitlement to exemption may not apply simply because they do not need to visit their doctors.At present, over 68 per cent. of all prescription items are dispensed free-of-charge under the exemption arrangements and a further 6 per cent. to holders of "season tickets".
One-Parent Families
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what percentage of those entitled to one-parent benefit who would benefit from receiving it do not claim it; and how much one-parent benefit, in money terms, is not claimed as a result.
Provisional figures for Great Britain for December 1981 indicate that about 30 per cent. of persons who would gain from receiving one-parent benefit had not claimed it. This represents unclaimed benefit of the order of £25 million in the present financial year.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the incidence of single parents in each local authority with social services responsibility in England.
The only information currently available for each area of the country is that from the 1981 census relating to numbers of private households in which there were usually resident only one person aged 16 years or over plus one or more children aged under 16. Most of such households comprise one-parent families. However, it is estimated that for the country as a whole such households account for just under one half of all one-parent families.1981 Census: households comprising only one person aged 16 or over, plus one or more children under 16 for metropolitan counties and districts, London boroughs and non-metropolitan counties in England.
| Number | Per cent, of all households | |
| English Metropolitan Counties | 95,301 | 2·3 |
| Greater Manchester | 23,183 | 2·5 |
| Bolton | 2,131 | 2·2 |
| Bury | 1,352 | 2·1 |
| Manchester | 5,274 | 3·2 |
| Oldham | 2,227 | 2·7 |
| Rochdale | 2,111 | 2·8 |
| Salford | 2,172 | 2·4 |
| Stockport | 2,166 | 2·1 |
| Tameside | 1,785 | 2·2 |
| Trafford | 1,754 | 2·2 |
| Wigan | 2,211 | 2·0 |
| Merseyside | 13,272 | 2·5 |
| Knowsley | 1,888 | 3·4 |
| Liverpool | 4,981 | 2·8 |
| St Helens | 1,379 | 2·1 |
Number
| Per cent, of all households
| |
| Sefton | 2,152 | 2·1 |
| Wirral | 2,872 | 2·3 |
| South Yorkshire | 9,215 | 1·9 |
| Barnsley | 1,493 | 1·8 |
| Doncaster | 2,290 | 2·2 |
| Rotherham | 1,814 | 2·0 |
| Sheffield | 3,618 | 1·8 |
| Tyne and Wear | 10,017 | 2·4 |
| Gateshead | 1,643 | 2·1 |
| Newcastle-upon-Tyne | 2,600 | 2·5 |
| North Tyneside | 1,818 | 2·4 |
| South Tyneside | 1,344 | 2·3 |
| Sunderland | 2,612 | 2·5 |
| West Midlands | 22,043 | 2·4 |
| Birmingham | 9,751 | 2·7 |
| Coventry | 2,933 | 2·6 |
| Dudley | 1,631 | 1·5 |
| Sandwell | 2,112 | 1·9 |
| Solihull | 1,786 | 2·6 |
| Walsall | 1,777 | 1·9 |
| Wolverhampton | 2,053 | 2·3 |
| West Yorkshire | 17,571 | 2·4 |
| Bradford | 4,129 | 2·5 |
| Calderdale | 1,649 | 2·3 |
| Kirklees | 2,966 | 2·2 |
| Leeds | 6,422 | 2·4 |
| Wakefield | 2,405 | 2·1 |
| Greater London | 67,424 | 2·7 |
| Inner London | 34,497 | 3·6 |
| City of London | 11 | 0·5 |
| Camden | 2,139 | 3·1 |
| Hackney | 3,351 | 4·9 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 2,050 | 3·4 |
| Haringey | 2,557 | 3·3 |
| Islington | 2,500 | 3·9 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 1,455 | 2·6 |
| Lambeth | 4,418 | 4·6 |
| Lewisham | 3,045 | 3·4 |
| Newham | 2,270 | 3·1 |
| Southwark | 3,520 | 4·2 |
| Tower Hamlets | 1,898 | 3·6 |
| Wandsworth | 3,528 | 3·6 |
| Westminster | 1,755 | 2·4 |
| Outer London | 32,927 | 2·1 |
| Barking and Dagenham | 1,301 | 2·3 |
| Bamett | 2,019 | 1·9 |
| Bexley | 1,328 | 1·7 |
| Brent | 2,840 | 3·2 |
| Bromley | 1,988 | 1·8 |
| Croydon | 2,761 | 2·4 |
| Ealing | 2,342 | 2·3 |
| Enfield | 1,840 | 1·9 |
| Greenwich | 2,408 | 3·1 |
| Harrow | 1,168 | 1·7 |
| Havering | 1,540 | 1·8 |
| Hillingdon | 1,618 | 2·0 |
| Hounslow | 1,694 | 2·3 |
| Kingston-upon-Thames | 919 | 1·8 |
| Merton | 1,299 | 2·0 |
| Redbridge | 1,453 | 1·8 |
| Richmond | 1,146 | 1·8 |
| Sutton | 1,162 | 1·8 |
| Waltham Forest | 2,101 | 2·6 |
Number
| Per cent, of all households
| |
| English Non-Metropolitan Counties | 190,889 | 1·9 |
| Avon | 6,846 | 2·1 |
| Bedfordshire | 3,547 | 2·0 |
| Berkshire | 4,263 | 1·8 |
| Buckinghamshire | 3,702 | 1·9 |
| Cambridgeshire | 3,982 | 1·9 |
| Cheshire | 6,294 | 1·9 |
| Cleveland | 4,763 | 2·4 |
| Cornwall and Isles of Scilly | 2,849 | 1·8 |
| Cumbria | 3,074 | 1·8 |
| Derbyshire | 5,696 | 1·7 |
| Devon | 6,601 | 1·9 |
| Dorset | 3,620 | 1·6 |
| Durham | 4,425 | 2·0 |
| East Sussex | 4,745 | 1·8 |
| Essex | 10,077 | 1·9 |
| Gloucestershire | 3,278 | 1·8 |
| Hampshire | 10,324 | 2·0 |
| Hereford and Worcester | 4,230 | 1·9 |
| Hertfordshire | 6,089 | 1·8 |
| Humberside | 6,139 | 2·0 |
| Isle of Wight | 803 | 1·8 |
| Kent | 9,622 | 1·8 |
| Lancashire | 10,422 | 2·1 |
| Leicestershire | 5,924 | 2·0 |
| Lincolnshire | 3,248 | 1·6 |
| Norfolk | 4,722 | 1·8 |
| Northamptonshire | 4,306 | 2·3 |
| Northumberland | 1,810 | 1·7 |
| North Yorkshire | 3,981 | 1·6 |
| Nottinghamshire | 7,619 | 2·1 |
| Oxfordshire | 3,254 | 1·8 |
| Shropshire | 2,506 | 1·9 |
| Somerset | 2,648 | 1·7 |
| Staffordshire | 6,263 | 1·7 |
| Suffolk | 3,521 | 1·6 |
| Surrey | 5,400 | 1·5 |
| Warwickshire | 3,077 | 1·8 |
| West Sussex | 3,884 | 1·6 |
| Wiltshire | 3,335 | 1·8 |
| ENGLAND | 353,614 | 2·1 |
Nursery Education
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the percentage of social service (lay nursery places available per 1,000 children aged under 5 years in each local authority in England with social services responsibilty.
The following table shows the number of full-time day nursery places provided by English local authorities at 31 March 1981, and the rates per 1,000 children aged under five:
| Day Nurseries—31 March 1981 | ||
| Local Authority | Places | Rate per thousand aged under 5 |
| England | 28,252 | 10·2 |
| Cleveland | 270 | 6·9 |
| Cumbria | 141 | 5·5 |
| Durham | 150 | 4·1 |
| Northumberland | 40 | 2·2 |
| Gateshead | 110 | 8·9 |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | 250 | 15·9 |
| North Tyneside | 91 | 8·4 |
Local Authority
| Places
| Rate per thousand aged under 5
|
| South Tyneside* | 200 | 22·8 |
| Sunderland | 220 | 11·0 |
| Humberside | 40 | 0·8 |
| North Yorkshire | 136 | 3·9 |
| Bamsley | 0 | 0·0 |
| Doncaster | 25 | 1·4 |
| Rotherham | 0 | 0·0 |
| Sheffield | 372 | 13·4 |
| Bradford | 452 | 13·7 |
| Calderdale | 85 | 7·5 |
| Kirklees | 186 | 7·7 |
| Leeds | 450 | 11·0 |
| Wakefield | 70 | 3·6 |
| Cheshire | 514 | 8·9 |
| Lancashire | 1,389 | 16·9 |
| Bolton | 215 | 12·7 |
| Bury† | 110 | 9·8 |
| Manchester | 1,217 | 45·5 |
| Oldham | 233 | 16·1 |
| Rochdale | 320 | 21·4 |
| Salford | 406 | 29·9 |
| Stockport | 152 | 8·5 |
| Tameside | 450 | 35·2 |
| Trafford | 240 | 18·8 |
| Wigan | 195 | 9·6 |
| Knowsley | 420 | 32·1 |
| Liverpool | 908 | 31·6 |
| Sefton | 286 | 16·8 |
| St Helens | 77 | 6·3 |
| Wirral | 220 | 11·1 |
| Hereford/Worcester | 61 | 1·6 |
| Salop | 0 | 0·0 |
| Staffordshire | 340 | 5·5 |
| Warwickshire | 0 | 0·0 |
| Birmingham | 1,443 | 22·4 |
| Coventry | 519 | 24·9 |
| Dudley | 0 | 0·0 |
| Sandwell | 140 | 7·5 |
| Solihull | 60 | 5·1 |
| Walsall | 120 | 7·8 |
| Wolverhampton* | 125 | 7·4 |
| Derbyshire | 425 | 7·9 |
| Leicestershire | 505 | 9·5 |
| Lincolnshire | 80 | 2·6 |
| Northamptonshire* | 100 | 2·8 |
| Nottinghamshire | 565 | 9·8 |
| Bedfordshire | 254 | 70 |
| Berkshire | 134 | 3·0 |
| Buckinghamshire | 50 | 1·3 |
| Cambridgeshire | 181 | 4·7 |
| Essex | 266 | 3·0 |
| Hertfordshire | 386 | 6·6 |
| Norfolk | 40 | 1·0 |
| Oxfordshire | 90 | 2·9 |
| Suffolk | 70 | 1·9 |
| Camden | 616 | 77·1 |
| Greenwich | 215 | 15·5 |
| Hackney | 546 | 39·3 |
| Hammersmith | 538 | 64·9 |
| Islington | 640 | 65·4 |
| Kensington | 354 | 60·1 |
| Lambeth† | 720 | 49·7 |
| Lewisham | 240 | 18·2 |
| Southwark | 572 | 46·9 |
| Tower Hamlets | 395 | 40'8 |
| Wandsworth | 667 | 420 |
| Westminster | 510 | 630 |
| City of London | 0 | 0·0 |
| Barking | 145 | 16·0 |
| Barnet | 281 | 16·8 |
| Bexley | 45 | 3·8 |
| Brent | 862 | 55·0 |
| Bromley | 50 | 3·2 |
| Croydon | 179 | 9·0 |
| Ealing | 352 | 20·8 |
| Enfield | 145 | 9·4 |
Local Authority
| Places
| Rate per thousand aged under 5
|
| Haringey | 280 | 21·6 |
| Harrow | 110 | 9·7 |
| Havering | 190 | 13·5 |
| Hillingdon | 250 | 17·4 |
| Hounslow | 191 | 14·9 |
| Kingston upon Thames* | 96 | 13·6 |
| Merton* | 139 | 14·8 |
| Newham | 253 | 16·7 |
| Redbridge | 70 | 5·6 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 131 | 18·5 |
| Sutton | 52 | 5·4 |
| Waltham Forest | 285 | 20·1 |
| Dorset | 105 | 3·6 |
| Hampshire | 339 | 3·9 |
| Isle of Wight | 0 | 0·0 |
| Kent | 32 | 0·4 |
| Surrey | 123 | 2·3 |
| East Sussex | 171 | 5·7 |
| West Sussex | 0 | 0·0 |
| Wiltshire | 0 | 0·0 |
| Avon | 550 | 10·5 |
| Cornwall | 0 | 0·0 |
| Devon | 74 | 1·5 |
| Gloucestershire† | 75 | 2·6 |
| Isles of Scilly | 0 | 0·0 |
| Somerset | 70 | 3·1 |
* 1979 figures. | ||
| † 1980 figures. | ||
Community Nurseries
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many community nurseries exist in England; and in which local authorities.
The statistics we collect from local authorities about day care show:
Community Dietitians
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many community dieticians posts there are; and what increase this represents over each of the last three years.
I regret that this information is not centrally available.
Food And Health Policy
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what guidance his Department gives to general practitioners, health visitors and community nurses about food and health policy.
In 1978 the Department published "Eating for Health"; one of the series of discussion papers flowing from publication of the "Prevention consultative document and Health—Everybody's Business". "Eating for Health" was prepared as a contribution to nutrition education for the general public and as information for doctors, health visitors, nurses and other health professionals who are in a position to influence attitudes to diet. It is also a source document for the Health Education Council.The Department also frequently produces reports on more detailed aspects of nutrition. These results from the deliberations of the Committee on Medical aspects of Food Policy—a body which advises the Chief Medical Officer on matters concerned with nutrition and public health.
Hospitals (Food)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) whether he has given advice to health authorities on giving hospital in-patients information about the health aspects of food;(2) if he is satisfied with the health aspects of hospital food; and if he gives guidance to health authorities on this subject;(3) if he will introduce a pilot scheme in the catering department of one hospital to emphasise the health promoting role of food.
I am satisfied that health authorities are conscious of the need to provide nutritious meals for hospital patients. Most authorities employ dietitians who are available to give guidance to patients.The Department updated its advice manual to health authorities on nutrition and modified diets in 1980 and issued a special edition on catering for minority groups in 1981. Further guidance is being prepared for issue to health authorities on how patients might be made more aware of the nutritional value of different foods. I do not consider that in these circumstances a pilot scheme is necessary.
Computers
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if, pursuant to the reply of the Prime Minister on 16 March, Official Report, column 71, relating to computers in the National Health Service, he will take steps to collect statistics on their numbers.
A register of computers in the National Health Service will come into operation in June.
| Table 1: Families not receiving Supplementary Benefit Great Britain | ||||||||||
| 1979 average | ||||||||||
| Thousands | ||||||||||
| Employment category | Below supplementary benefit level | Above supplementary benefit level but within 10 per cent, of it | Above supplementary benefit level but within 20 per cent, of it | Above supplementary benefit level but within 40 per cent, of it | Total below supplementary benefit and above supplementary benefit level but within 40 per cent, of it | |||||
| Families with | Families | Children | Families | Children | Families | Children | Families | Children | Families | Children |
| In full-time work or self-employed | ||||||||||
| One parent | [*] | [*] | [*] | [10] | [*] | [10] | [10] | [10] | [10] | [10] |
| Two parents | 70 | 150 | [40] | [90] | 90 | 250 | 330 | 800 | 400 | 950 |
| One and two parents | 80 | 160 | [40] | [100] | 100 | 250 | 330 | 810 | 410 | 960 |
| Sick or disabled for more than three months | ||||||||||
| One and two parents | [*] | [*] | [10] | [20] | [20] | [40] | [40] | [90] | [40] | [90] |
| Unemployed for more than three months | ||||||||||
| One and two parents | [20] | [30] | [10] | [20] | [20] | [30] | [20] | [40] | [40] | [70] |
| Others | ||||||||||
| One parent | [†] | [†] | [†] | [†] | [†] | [†] | [†] | [†] | 90 | 160 |
Income Levels
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) pursuant to the reply of 23 October 1981, if the figures for 1979 are now available which will show how many children were living in families below the supplementary benefit level, on supplementary' benefit with incomes up to 10 per cent., 20 per cent. and 40 per cent. above supplementary benefit level, classified by the employment status of the head of the family; and whether there were one or two parents;(2) pursuant to the replies of 23 October 1981,
Official Report, column 202, and 25 January, Official Report, column 281, on the basis of the 1979 family expenditure survey, how many children were living in families with incomes below supplementary benefit level and with incomes above but within 10 per cent., 20 per cent. and 40 per cent. of it, classified by the unemployment status of the head of the family and by whether there were one or two parents.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the latest estimate of the number of children (a) living below supplementary benefit level, (b) living in families receiving supplementary benefit and (c) living in families whose income is less than 40 per cent. above supplementary level.
[pursuant to the replies, 25 January 1982, c. 281, and 25 February 1982, c. 491]: The information requested is shown in the following two tables. For families not receiving supplementary benefit—table 1—it is not possible to give reliable estimates for all of the categories, because some of the samples are too small. For families receiving supplementary benefit, a full breakdown is shown in table 2.The figures are based on estimates contained in a set of tables under the general heading "Low Income Families—1979". I am sending copies to the right hon. Member and the hon. Member, from which they will note that a change in the method of arriving at the estimates has been introduced, in order to give a truer indication of the extent of low incomes. The change is explained in the notes accompanying the tables. I have also placed copies in the Library of the House.
Employment category
| Below supplementary benefit level
| Above supplementary benefit level but within 10 per cent, of it
| Above supplementary benefit level but within 20 per cent, of it
| Above supplementary benefit level but within 40 per cent, of it
| Total below supplementary benefit and above supplementary benefit level but within 40 per cent, of it
| |||||
Families with
| Families
| Children
| Families
| Children
| Families
| Children
| Families
| Children
| Families
| Children
|
| Two parents | [†] | [†] | [†] | [†] | [†] | [†] | [†] | [†] | [20] | [20] |
| One and two parents | [40] | [70] | [10] | [20] | [10] | [30] | 60 | 110 | 110 | 180 |
Total numbers of families and children
| ||||||||||
| One parent | [40] | [60] | [20] | [20] | [30] | [60] | 80 | 140 | 120 | 200 |
| Two parents | 100 | 200 | 50 | 130 | 120 | 290 | 380 | 900 | 490 | 1,100 |
| One and two parents | 140 | 260 | 70 | 150 | 150 | 360 | 460 | 1,040 | 600 | 1,300 |
Notes:
* Indicates that the number in the group is below 10,000.
† Indicates that the sample is too a reliable estimate to be made.
The figures shown in square brackets are subject to very considerable proportionate statistical error.
Table 2: Families receving Supplementary Benefit Great Britain—1979 average
| ||||||
Thousands
| ||||||
Employment category
| One-parent families
| Two-parent families
| One and two-parent families
| |||
Families
| Children
| Families
| Children
| Families
| Children
| |
| Sick or disabled for more than three months | [*] | [*] | [10] | [20] | [10] | [20] |
| Unemployed for more than three months | [*] | [10] | 110 | 280 | 120 | 280 |
| Others | 310 | 570 | [*] | [10] | 320 | 580 |
| Totals | 320 | 580 | 130 | 310 | 450 | 880 |
Notes:
* indicates that the number in the group is below 10,000.
The figures shown in square brackets are subject to very considerable proportionate statistical error.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what percentage of families in the following groups have incomes within 20 per cent. above supplementary benefit level (a) elderly single people, (b) elderly couples, (c) single adults, (d) couples without children, (e) couples with children and (f) single-parent families;(2) what percentage of families in the following groups have incomes at supplementary benefit level or below
(a) elderly single people, (b) elderly couples, (c) single adults, (d) couples without children, (e) couples with children and (f) single-parent families.
Great Britain
| |||
Family group
| Percentage of families in each family group not in receipt of supplementary benefit but
| ||
with incomes above but within 20 per cent, of the supplementary benefit level
| with incomes below the supplementary benefit level
| in receipt of supplementary benefit
| |
| OVER PENSION AGE | |||
(a) Single persons | 18 | 16 | 33 |
(b) Married couples | 20 | 11 | 14 |
| UNDER PENSION AGE | |||
(c) Single persons without children | 2 | 5 | 5 |
(d) Married couples without children | 1 | 1 | 1 |
(e) Married couples with children | 2 | 2 | 2 |
(f) Single persons with children | 4 | 5 | 38 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when he expects to publish the latest family
[pursuant to the reply, 10 December 1981, c. 463]: The percentages requested are shown in the following table. The figures are based on estimates contained in a set of tables under the general heading "Low Income Families—1979". I am sending a copy to the right hon. Gentleman, from which he will note that a change in the method of arriving at the estimates has been introduced, in order to give a truer indication of the extent of low incomes. The change is explained in the notes accompanying the tables. I have also placed copies in the Library of the House.expenditure survey data on the numbers of poor households; and if the material is ready for publication, if he will publish it in the
Official Report.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he is now able to update the information contained in tables 47·04 and 47·08 of the 1978 Social Security Statistics which give the estimated numbers of families and persons with income at or below the supplementary benefit level.
[pursuant to the replies, 17 November 1981, c. 115, and 17 February 1982, c. 141.]: The estimates requested have been set out in a series of comprehensive tables under the general heading "Low Income Families—1979". I regret that I am unable to justify the cost of reproducing these tables in the Official Report. I am therefore placing copies in the Library of the House and sending personal copies to the hon. Members. The hon. Members will note that a change in the method of arriving at the estimates has been introduced, in order to give a truer indication of the extent of low incomes. The change is explained in the notes accompanying the tables.