Written Answers To Questions
Wednesday 12 May 1982
Trade
Roadside Advertising Services
asked the Minister for Trade whether he has decided what action to take on the report of the Monopolies and Mergers Commission on roadside advertising services; and if he will make a statement.
The Director General of Fair Trading has now completed the discussions which my right hon. Friend the then Secretary of State invited him to undertake, following the publication of the commission's report on 1 July 1981, with British Posters Ltd. and its 10 member companies and with the two trade associations mentioned in the report. As a result of these discussions, British Posters Ltd. and the two trade associations have given certain undertakings to my right hon. and noble Friend.The commission found that scale and complex monopoly situations existed in favour of British Posters Ltd. and its member companies and concluded that these monopoly situations operated against the public interest.The commission noted that certain of the adverse effects on the public interest arose from the existence of British Posters Ltd. in its present form, and it was satisfied that it would not be possible to amend its constitution whilst retaining its existing membership or a broadly similar membership, without retaining the substance of these adverse effects. The commission therefore recommended that British Posters Ltd. should cease to exist and should not be reformed. My right hon. Friend the then Secretary of State accepted the recommendation, and at his request the Director General secured the following undertakings from British Posters Ltd.:
In addition to the main findings against British Posters Ltd. and its member companies, the commission found a complex monopoly situation to exist in favour of the two trade associations covering all the significant poster contractors—the British Poster Advertising Association and the Solus Outdoor Advertising Association—by virtue of provisions in their joint standards of conduct requiring their members not to bid or negotiate for, nor interfere with, sites occupied by a fellow member of either association. This restricted competition in the acquisition of sites and the commission took the view that this feature operated against the public interest. My right hon. Friend the then Secretary of State accepted this view, and at his request the Director General secured undertakings from the two associations that they would delete the offending provisions—clauses (a)-(d) of their 1980 standards—and not introduce anything to a like effect.
In addition to negotiating the closure of British Posters Ltd., the Director General also held discussions with the member companies of British Posters Ltd. aimed at establishing criteria for the future joint marketing of roadside advertising panels which did not give rise to the adverse effects upon competition which the Monopolies and Mergers Commission had identified in respect of British Posters Ltd. However, although the individual companies approached these discussions in a constructive and co-operative manner, the Director General was unable to reconcile the conflicting commercial interests of the 10 member companies with an outcome which he could recommend to my right hon. and noble Friend. He therefore reported that it was not possible to reach an acceptable solution and advised on alternative courses of action.
My right hon. and noble Friend has weighed these carefully and has accepted the Director General's advice that it would not be appropriate for him to use his powers under section 56 of the Fair Trading Act to impose criteria upon the industry. Following the announcement by British Posters Ltd. that it would cease trading on 31 March 1982, a number of new methods of packaging poster sites have come onto the market. These include the major companies offering regional campaigns with sites contracted in from other companies, and a greater role for the independent specialist poster bureaux. In these circumstances, my right hon. and noble Friend believes that it is right to allow the industry a period during which it can react to the closure of British Posters Ltd. and the changes to the trade associations standards of conduct before deciding whether further Government intervention is necessary or desirable. He has therefore asked the Director General to keep a close watch on developments over the next two years and to advise within that period on what action, if any, Is desirable. In order to enable the Director General to monitor developments, he has asked him to obtain undertakings from each of the 10 members of British Posters Ltd. that they will inform him of any joint marketing arrangement to which they become a party.
Laid-Up Tonnage
asked the Minister for Trade what is his estimate of the tonnage of British-registered tankers and cargo vessels at present laid up.
Figures published by the General Council of British Shipping show United Kingdom registered deadweight tonnage laid up for lack of employment of 131,000 dwt for dry cargo vessels and 1,643,000 dwt for tankers at 31 March 1982.
Mr B E Calvert
asked the Minister for Trade (1) pursuant to the answer to the right hon. Member for Manchester, Wythenshawe, on 10 November, Official Report, c. 58, concerning the appointment and conduct of liquidators and the case of Mr. B. E. Calvert, when he expects the final report of the Insolvency Law Review Committee to be published;(2) whether the inquiries under section 165 of the Companies Act 1948 into Corporate Management Planning Ltd., referred to in the answer of 21 January to the right hon. Member for Manchester, Wythenshawe, about the case of Mr. B. E. Calvert,
Official Report, c. 156–7, have now been completed; and if he will make a statement;
(3) whether his Department has completed the inquiries into the books and papers of Corporate Management
Planning Ltd. under section 109 of the Companies Act 1967, referred to in the answer to the right hon. Member for Manchester, Wythenshawe, on 10 November, Offical Report, c. 58, about the case of Mr. B. E. Calvert; and if he will make a statement;
(4) whether his Department has now completed the inquiries into Chancery Lane Registrars (Northern) Ltd. under section 109 of the Companies Act 1967, referred to in the answer to the right hon. Member for Manchester, Wythenshawe, on 19 November, Official Report, c. 211, concerning the case of Mr. B. E. Calvert; and if he will make a statement.
I shall reply to the right hon. Member as soon as possible.
Northern Ireland
Cervical Cancer
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland whether he has considered the gross annual variations in recent years in the incidence of cervical cancer; and if he will promote investigations to ascertain the explanation.
I regret that my reply to the hon. Member for Eccles (Mr. Carter-Jones) on 27 April 1982 gave incomplete information for 1979 and 1980.—[Vol. 22, c. 256–57.] This arose because until 1979 only one record was kept of cervical cancer cases which, unlike the Great Britain records, did not distinguish between malignant neoplasm and carcinoma in situ and details of the latter type were omitted from the table. It has now been decided to maintain records on a common basis throughout the United Kingdom. The corrected statistics are shown in the following table:
| 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | |
| 15–24 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 12 |
| 25–34 | 14 | 14 | 27 | 44 | 36 |
| 35–44 | 15 | 14 | 17 | 29 | 29 |
| 45–54 | 21 | 16 | 22 | 17 | 23 |
| 55–64 | 25 | 25 | 24 | 19 | 21 |
| 65–74 | 18 | 13 | 15 | 19 | 8 |
| 75+ | 8 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 7 |
| Total | 107 | 95 | 121 | 144 | 136 |
Scotland
Salmon Fisheries
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland to what extent the Government's policy towards the
| Numbers of young people under 18 years of age registered as unemployed in Scotland | |||||
| Year | January | April | July | October | Average |
| 1975 | Not available | 21,989 | |||
| 1976 | 18,394 | 30,491 | |||
| 1977 | 24,411 | 37,960 | |||
| 1978 | 26,949 | 36,506 | 19,726 | ||
proposals in the Salmon Fisheries (Protection) (Scotland) Bill [Lords] reflect the views expressed in any consultations he has conducted with fishermen who may be affected by the Bill.
The Salmon Fisheries (Protection) (Scotland) Bill is a Private Member's measure and consultation with particular interests about the Bill's provisions is a matter for the proposers. Nevertheless, the Bill's main purpose—to ban the use of gill nets, however set, for the taking of salmon in Scottish waters—is consistent with a proposal made in the Government's discussion document issued in December 1979. The discussion document was widely published and has been the subject of extensive consultation. The need to tighten the law on the use of gill nets for catching salmon attracted considerable support from a range of salmon interests.
Unemployment Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the average monthly total of registered unemployed in Scotland in 1970, 1974, 1978 and 1981, respectively.
The information is set out in the following table.
| Year | Numbers registered as unemployed in Scotland (annual average) |
| 1970 | 90,900 |
| 1974 | 88,400 |
| 1978 | 184,700 |
| 1981 | 307,200 |
Note 1 The 1974 average has been calculated on the basis of 11 months; because of industrial action at certain Department of Employment Offices information for December 1974 is not available.
Note 2 The 1970 and 1974 figures include adult students registered for vocational employment.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the average monthly total of youth unemployment in Scotland in each of the last seven years.
It is not possible to calculate a monthly average of youth unemployment, since before mid-1978 the unemployment register was only analysed by age twice yearly and since then the analysis has been undertaken quarterly. The following table gives the numbers of young people under 18 years of age who were registered as unemployed in Scotland in the months for which information is available. Because of the incidence of school leaving dates January and July are peak months for youth unemployment in Scotland and consequently meaningful annual averages can only be calculated for 1979 and later years.
Year
| January
| April
| July
| October
| Average
|
| 1979 | 22,373 | 14,745 | 32,905 | 17,681 | 21,926 |
| 1980 | 22,436 | 16,087 | 41,799 | 26,417 | 26,685 |
| 1981 | 30,623 | 23,685 | 38,486 | 31,000 | 30,949 |
Note: Information for January 1975 is not available because of industrial action at some Department of Employment Offices.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the average monthly total of registered unemployed women in Scotland in each year since 1970.
The information is set out in the following table.
| Numbers of females registered as unemployed in Scotland | |
| Year | (annual average) |
| 1970 | 17,200 |
| 1971 | 24,300 |
| 1972 | 29,100 |
| 1973 | 21,000 |
| 1974 | 17,500 |
| 1975 | 28,400 |
| 1976 | 43,000 |
| 1977 | 57,100 |
| 1978 | 61,000 |
| 1979 | 62,800 |
| 1980 | 78,600 |
| 1981 | 99,000 |
Note 1:
The 1974 and 1975 averages have been calculated on the basis of 11 months only; because of industrial action at certain Department of Employment offices information for December 1974 and January 1975 is not available.
Note 2:
The figures for 1970 to 1975 include adult students registered for vacation employment.
Law, Order And Protective Services (Expenditure)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the total expenditure on law, order and protective services in Scotland, at constant 1979 prices in each of the last five years; and what are the projected estimates for 1982–83 and 1983–84.
The information is as follows:
| Year | £ million (at cash prices) |
| 1977–78 | 170 |
| 1978–79 | 192 |
| 1979–80 | 243 |
| 1980–81 | 302 |
| 1981–82 | *345 |
| 1982–83 | *403 |
| 1983–84 | *440 |
Note:
* Forecast: in the case of 1981–82 final outturn not yet available.
Public expenditure is now planned in terms of cash, and a constant price series of figures as used in previous public expenditure White Papers is no longer maintained. Published figures at 1979 prices in respect of law, order and protective services in Scotland were contained in the minutes of evidence taken before the Committee on Scottish Affairs in June 1981—HC 364 Session 1980–81, page 29.
Education And Science
Teachers (Assaults By Pupils)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will take steps to require each local education authority to maintain and publish regularly registers of violent assaults by pupils or parents against teachers; and if he will provide a working definition of an assault for this purpose.
The incidence and nature of assaults on teachers are rightly matters of concern for local education authorities. My right hon. Friend has no power to make a requirement on the lines proposed.
Pupil-Teacher Ratio
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what is the current average pupil to teacher ratio in State primary schools; and how this compares for every year since 1970.
Pupil-teacher ratios within maintained primary schools in England for each year from 1970 to 1981 are as follows. The ratio for 1982 will not be available until the Autumn.
| January | Pupil-teacher ratio within maintained primary schools* |
| 1970 | 27·5 |
| 1971 | 27·0 |
| 1972 | 26·2 |
| 1973 | 25·5 |
| 1974 | 24·9 |
| 1975 | 24·2 |
| 1976 | 24·0 |
| 1977 | 23·9 |
| 1978 | 23·6 |
| 1979 | 23·1 |
| 1989 | 22·7 |
| 1981 | 22·6 |
| * From January 1971 qualified teachers only. | |
Civil Service
Government Departments (Sexual Harassment)
asked the Minister for the Civil Service whether any talks are taking place between her Department and the Civil Service unions on the setting up of a survey to determine whether there is sexual harassment, male and female, at places of work within Government Departments; and what would be the cost of such survey.
No. A joint review group of management and trade unions is presently considering all aspects of the employment of women in the Civil Service, and the trade unions have suggested that the question of sexual harassment should be considered as a possible problem.
House Of Commons
Members (Pay)
asked the Lord President of the Council if he will make a statement on the salaries of hon. Members.
The Top Salaries Review Body has not been asked to make recommendations this year on the pay of Members of Parliament and it is necessary to come to a conclusion about the right levels of salary for 1982. The Government therefore propose that the House should accept an increase of 4 per cent. in pay, and in the allowances payable to MPs for secretarial assistance, in line with the pay factor included in Estimates.The pay and allowances of Ministers have broadly followed the pattern of increases accepted by the House in recent years. We intend to propose, therefore, at the appropriate time, that the pay and allowances of Ministers should be increased by the same 4 per cent. pay factor as we recommend to the House for the pay of Members of Parliament.
Wales
Plutonium Waste (Cancer)
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will instigate inquiries into the incidence of cancer among people living along the Welsh coastline, following the recent report by the Political Ecology Research Group suggesting an increase in the incidence of cancer along the Irish Sea coast as a result of the dumping of plutonium waste in the sea at Windscale; and if he will make a statement.
No. As the report itself states, any increased incidence of cancer from this cause would not be detectable amongst a background of high cancer rates generally.
Home Department
Police Stations (Lay Visitors)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list all those individuals and organisations he has consulted about the Scarman report's recommendation that lay visitors be allowed into police station detention areas.
Preliminary consultations have taken place with all chief police officers and police authorities in England and Wales. In addition, we have noted the views expressed on this matter by individuals and organisations whom Home Office officials met in the course of recent visits to a number of police force areas to discuss Lord Scarman's recommendations for local liaison committees.
Jury Panels
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the reply of the Solicitor-General to the hon. Member for Newham, North-West (Mr. Lewis) on 26 April, Official Report, c. 175, if he will introduce legislation to provide for jury panels to reflect the racial mix of the area of the court's jurisdiction.
No.
Wormwood Prison (Television Film)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will cause an investigation to be made to ascertain how and why Independent Television was allowed to make a film at Her Majesty's prison Wormwood Scrubs, shown on Sunday 2 May on the "South Bank Show", in which prisoners serving life sentences for murder were enabled to take part with professional actresses in sexually titillating scenes; and whether he will prevent such actions in the future, especially in the top security wings of prisons.
No. We are satisfied that the action taken in granting facilities to the television company was in accordance with our policy on these matters; and that the work of the stage class in D Wing, of which this production formed part, is valuable and should continue.
Post Office Act 1969
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department in what instrument he has set out and publicised the conditions under which he exercises his power under section 3(3) of the Post Office Act 1969.
It has been found necessary to provide general guidance on the circumstances in which wireless telegraphy licence fees may be refunded under section 3(3) of the Post Office Act 1969 only in relation to television licences. The circumstances are set out on the back of the television licence form.
British Citizenship
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many application forms for British citizenship were in stock on 31 March.
About 158,000.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will give a breakdown on a monthly basis for the last year for which information is available of the number of applicants for British citizenship and the number who were successful.
The information for 1981 is as follows:
| Number of applications | Certificates issued | |
| January | 6,353 | 2,565 |
| February | 6,341 | 2,371 |
| March | 8,246 | 4,572 |
| April | 8,780 | 2,020 |
| May | 7,389 | 2,831 |
| June | 5,017 | 3,129 |
| July | 4,768 | 4,737 |
| August | 4,070 | 4,669 |
| September | 4,760 | 5,170 |
| October | 4,919 | 7,396 |
| November | 4,709 | 5,740 |
| December | 4,740 | 4,136 |
| Total | 70,092 | 49,336 |
Immigration
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent complaints he has had about the difficulty experienced by people wishing to re-enter the United Kingdom after previously being given leave to stay for an unlimited period; and what steps he has taken.
Following our review of policy on returning residents, we announced last December certain changes designed to overcome some of the difficulties experienced by such people. We are not aware of any recent general complaints on this subject; complaints about individual cases are considered on their merits.
Prime Minister
Top Salaries Review Body (Report)
asked the Prime Minister if she has any further statement to make about the report of the Top Salaries Review Body.
I informed the House last week that the Government were considering the report of the Top Salaries Review Body on the pay of the higher Civil Service, senior officers of the Armed Forces and the judiciary. I am now able to announce our decisions.The report recommends increases in the pay of the higher Civil Service and senior officers of the Armed Forces averaging 13 per cent., and for the judiciary 20 per cent., above the levels recommended as appropriate at 1 April 1980.Because the 1980 recommendations have, for the most part, not been fully implemented, the recommended increases over the salaries currently in payment are somewhat larger: 19·4 per cent. for the Civil Service and the Armed Forces and 24·3 per cent. for the judiciary. In its report the TSRB argues cogently that substantial increases in the salaries of these groups are now justified. The Government agree. It is in the national interest to ensure an adequate supply of candidates of sufficient calibre for appointment to judicial office and to provide an adequate career structure and suitable differentials in the higher reaches of the Civil Service and the Armed Forces. The House will remember that, after many years of restraint, the pay of these groups is still on average 5 per cent. below the levels considered appropriate as long ago
| Top Salaries Review Body Groups: Schedule of New Salaries | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Current salary | TSRB recommendation for 1 April 1980 | TSRB recommendation for 1 April 1982 | New salary | Percentage increase over current salary | Percentage increase over TSRB 1980 | Number in group | |
| £ | £ | £ | |||||
| a. Senior grades of the higher Civil Service | |||||||
| Permanent Secretary to the Treasury | 35,845 | 37,000 | 45,000 | 42,000 | 17 | 14 | 2 |
| Secretary to the Cabinet | |||||||
| Permanent Secretary | 33,170 | 34,000 | 40,000 | 37,750 | 14 | 11 | 22 |
| Second Permanent Secretary | 30,495 | 31,000 | 37,000 | 35,000 | 15 | 13 | 16 |
| Deputy Secretary | 26,215 | 27,000 | 32,000 | 30,250 | 15 | 12 | 141 |
| Under Secretary | 21,935 | 23,500 | 26,000 | 25,000 | 14 | 6 | 524 |
| b. Senior officers in the Armed Forces | |||||||
as 1 April 1980. This situation is unique among public servants and, in the Government's view, its continuation would carry unacceptable risks of long-term damage to our ability to attract and retain individuals of the high calibre needed to fill these vital posts.
There are sound management reasons for bringing these salaries up to date quickly and for keeping them up to date in future. But the immediate increases needed for this purpose are large; and, as I announced last week, the Government have felt obliged to cut back the salaries recommended for doctors and dentists in the most recent DDRB report. Accordingly, we have decided that we must ask the TSRB groups also to accept some abatement in their salaries this year. The precise level of abatement o be applied is a matter of judgment. A table showing the conclusions to which the Government have come is appended to this answer. We were particularly concerned with the need to provide adequate pay differentials between the lowest grades of the Civil Service and the Armed Forces covered by the report and their colleagues immediately below them in their respective organisations. For the rest we have applied an abatement of about one-third of the proposed increase at the highest levels in each group and have settled intermediate salaries broadly in line with the pattern of differentials proposed in the review body's report. We recognise that this abatement will be one of the factors to be taken into account by the review body in the course of its next review.
The Government's decisions mean weighted average increases in the salaries of the higher Civil Service and senior officers of the Armed Forces of 8 per cent. above the rates of salary recommended for 1 April 1980 and 14·3 per cent. above the salaries currently in payment. The equivalent figures for the judiciary are 14·5 per cent. and 18·6 per cent. The new rates of salary will come into effect from 1 April 1982. The cost of implementing the Government's proposals will be about £7·5 million. In the case of the Civil Service and the Armed Forces, the increases represent less than 0·05 per cent. of their combined pay bills.
The report of the Top Salaries Review Body has been laid before the House today and will be published as a Command Paper shortly. Copies in typescript are now available in the Vote Office.
1
| 2
| 3
| 4
| 5
| 6
| 7
| |
Current salary
| TSRB recommendation for 1 April 1980
| TSRB recommendation for 1 April 1982
| New salary
| Percentage increase over current salary
| Percentage increase over TSRB 1980
| Number in group
| |
£
| £
| £
| |||||
| Admiral of the Fleet | 35,845 | 37,000 | 45,000 | 42,000 | 17 | 14 | 1 |
| Field Marshal | |||||||
| Marshal of the Royal Air Force | |||||||
| Admiral | 33,170 | 34,000 | 40,000 | 37,750 | 14 | 11 | 20 |
| General | |||||||
| Air Chief Marshal | |||||||
| Vice-Admiral | 26,215 | 27,000 | 32,000 | 30,250 | 15 | 12 | 37 |
| Lieutenant General | |||||||
| Air Marshal | |||||||
| Medical Rear Admiral | 23,005 | 23,500 | 26,000 | 25,000 | 9 | 6 | 17 |
| Medical Major General | |||||||
| Medical Air Vice-Marshal | |||||||
| Rear Admiral | 21,935 | 23,500 | 26,000 | 25,000 | 14 | 6 | 141 |
| Major General | |||||||
| Air Vice-Marshal | |||||||
c. Judiciary
| |||||||
| Lord Chief Justice | 44,500 | 43,000 | 56,000 | 52,500 | 18 | 22 | 1 |
| Mater of the Rolls | 41,000 | 40,000 | 51,500 | 48,250 | 18 | 21 | 11 |
| Lord of Appeal | |||||||
| Lord President of the Court of Session (Scotland) | |||||||
| Lord Chief Justice (Northern Ireland) | 39,000 | 38,500 | 50,000 | 47,000 | 21 | 22 | 2 |
| President of the Family Division | |||||||
| Lord Justice of Appeal | 37,500 | 36,500 | 48,500 | 45,500 | 21 | 25 | 22 |
| Lord Justice Clerk (Scotland) | |||||||
| Lord Justice of Appeal (Northern Ireland) | |||||||
| Vice-Chancellor | 37,500 | 36,000 | 48,500 | 45,500 | 21 | 26 | 1 |
| High Court Judge | 35,000 | 35,000 | 45,000 | 42,500 | 21 | 21 | 99 |
| Judge of the Court of Session (Scotland) | |||||||
| Puisne Judge (Northern Ireland) | |||||||
| President, Lands Tribunal (England and Wales) | 25,500 | 26,000 | 31,500 | 30,000 | 18 | 15 | 4 |
| President, Transport Tribunal | |||||||
| Chief Social Security Commissioner (England and Wales and Scotland) | |||||||
| President, Industrial Tribunals (England and Wales) | |||||||
| President, Industrial Tribunals (Scotland) | 24,750 | 25,250 | 30,500 | 29,000 | 17 | 15 | 9 |
| Sheriff Principal (Scotland) | |||||||
| Chairman, Scottish Land Court | |||||||
| President, Lands Tribunal (Scotland) | |||||||
| Official Referee (London) | 24,500 | 24,500 | 30,500 | 29,000 | 18 | 18 | 10 |
| Vice-Chancellor of the County Palatine of Lancaster | |||||||
| Recorder of Liverpool | |||||||
| Recorder of Manchester | |||||||
| Senior Circuit Judge, Newington Causeway | |||||||
| Recorder of Belfast (Northern Ireland) | |||||||
| President of the Lands Tribunal (Northern Ireland)* | |||||||
| Chief Social Security Commisssioner (Northern Ireland)* | |||||||
1
| 2
| 3
| 4
| 5
| 6
| 7
| |
Current salary
| TSRB recommendation for 1 April 1980
| TSRB recommendation for 1 April 1982
| New salary
| Percentage increase over current salary
| Percentage increase over TSRB 1980
| Number in group
| |
£
| £
| £
| |||||
| Circuit Judge | 23,250 | 24,000 | 29,000 | 27,750 | 19 | 16 | 385 |
| Chief Metropolitan Magistrate | |||||||
| Member, Lands Tribunal (England and Wales and Scotland) | |||||||
| Social Security Commissioner (England and Wales and Scotland) | |||||||
| Judge Advocate General | |||||||
| Sheriff A (Scotland) | |||||||
| County Court Judge (Northern Ireland) | |||||||
| Master of the Court of Protection | |||||||
| Senior and Chief Masters and Registrars of the Supreme Court | |||||||
| Registrar of Criminal Appeals | |||||||
| President, Industrial Tribunal (Northern Ireland)* | |||||||
| Member, Lands Tribunal (Northern Ireland)* | |||||||
| Social Security Commissioner (Northern Ireland)* | |||||||
| Sheriff B (Scotland) | 23,250 | 23,500 | 29,000 | 27,750 | 19 | 18 | 56 |
| Regional Chairmen, Industrial Tribunals (England and Wales and Scotland) | 22,750 | 23,500 | 27,000 | 25,750 | 13 | 10 | 17 |
| Chairman, Foreign Compensation Commission | |||||||
| Vice-Judge Advocate General | 22,000 | 22,500 | 27,000 | 25,750 | 17 | 14 | 1 |
| Masters and Registrars of the Supreme Court | 20,750 | 22,500 | 25,000 | 24,000 | 16 | 7 | 181 |
| Metropolitan Magistrate | |||||||
| Chairmen, Industrial Tribunals (England and Wales and Scotland) | |||||||
| Provincial Stipendiary Magistrate | |||||||
| Resident Magistrate (Northern Ireland)* | |||||||
| Chairman, Industrial Tribunal (Northern Ireland)* | |||||||
| Master, Supreme Court (Northern Ireland)* | |||||||
| County Court Registrars and District Registrars of the High Court | 20,500 | 22,000 | 25,000 | 24,000 | 17 | 9 | 153 |
Note:
* These appointments were added to the remit after report No. 14. The salaries shown for the appointments in column 2 are those recommended in report No. 16 in 1 April 1980 terms.
Falkland Islands
asked the Prime Minister, in view of the fact that the Argentine Government have been condemned by the United Nations for having committed unprovoked aggression and are still refusing to implement United Nations decisions, what guarantees Her Majesty's Government consider necessary to ensure that, even if the Argentine Government promise withdrawal and the establishment of the status quo, this action will actually be taken.
The Government regard it as of the greatest importance that any ceasefire arrangements or agreement in settlement of the dispute should contain satisfactory provisions for ensuring that what has been agreed is implemented in full.
asked the Prime Minister what has been the total cost of the Falklands operation so far.
It is not possible at this stage to give an accurate assessment of the total cost of the Falklands operation. However, the extra costs so far represent a small proportion of total public expenditure, and can and will be financed without departing from the Government's economic strategy.
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Farm Incomes
asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, further to his reply dated 20 April, Official Report, c. 65–66, concerning the reduction in the real incomes of farmers since 1970, if he will publish a table in the Official Report in terms of persons or holdings or otherwise showing farming income for different sectors and in particular the returns on cereals, milk and livestock products.
The figures I gave in reply to the hon. Member's previous question were derived from the output, input and income tables of successive annual review of agriculture White Papers. These do not apportion farming income between individual sectors, and it is not therefore possible to provide comparable information on the lines requested. Information on the average net income of different types of farm is however given in paragraphs 11–13 and in table 24 of the "Annual Review of Agriculture 1982" White Paper, Cmnd. 8491.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, further to the reply of 20 April, Official Report, c. 62, showing the change in the real incomes of farmers since 1970, whether and to what extent the figures represent a change in the actual standards of living of farmers in terms of disposable incomes; whether he collects figures of incomes in a form which enables them to be classified by income groups; and whether he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the distribution of farm incomes on the same or as near the same basis as given by the hon. Member for Cirencester and Tewkesbury (Mr. Ridley) in his reply of 8 March, Official Report, c. 299–300.
The figures which I gave in my previous reply to the hon. Member were based on the farming income figure in successive annual review of agriculture White Papers. The farming income calculation does not measure the disposable income of individual farmers and it follows that the figures may not represent changes in actual standards of living. Nor does the calculation permit classification by income groups. Information is however available from the farm management surveys about the distribution of full-time farms according to the level of net farm income as defined in the surveys. The latest published analyses are given, for England, in table 3 "Farm Management Survey in England, Supplementary Analyses 1979/80"; for Scotland in table 3 of "Farm Accounts 1979/80 and 1980/81, Analysis by type and size for full time farm businesses"; and for Northern Ireland in table 5 of "Farm Accounts Northern Ireland 1979/80 and 1980/81". Copies of these documents are in the Library of the House.
European Community (Surplus Wine)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) whether he is satisfied that the European Economic Community Commission will be able to police the arrangements for the disposal of alcohol distilled from wine resulting from the 1982 exceptional distillation operation, in view of the problems encountered in similar operations;
(2) whether consideration was given to embodying the EEC Council's and Commission's undertakings on the United Kingdom ethyl alcohol industry in the EEC regulation (701/82) authorising the exceptional distillation of 6·5 million hectolitres of wine;
(3) whether he is satisfied with the terms of the guarantee from the EEC Council and Commission concerning the United Kingdom ethyl alcohol industry, under which the Commission retains sole judgment on whether the ethyl alcohol market will be disturbed, and which contains no provision whereby the agreement of Her Majesty's Government is required before a disposal is made;
(4) why the undertaking of the EEC Council and Commission concerning the United Kingdom ethyl alcohol industry contains no condition that Community aid for wine alcohol disposal be limited so that its floor price is equal to the grain alcohol price, in view of the implications for the United Kingdom ethyl alcohol and Scotch whisky industries;
(5) why the guarantee received from the EEC Council and Commission concerning the United Kingdom ethyl alcohol industry is in the form of a joint draft declaration by the Council and Commission; why it refers only to 1982; and why it is stated to be without prejudice to the proposed amendment (COM(81) 408 Final) to the 1979 wine regulation.
The undertakings made by the Council and Commission in connection with the exceptional distillation under regulation 701/82 were designed to protect the markets for ethyl alcohol, of which the United Kingdom is a major producer, and were included at my request. No such safeguards applied to previous distillations. I am satisfied with the legal framework and administrative procedures for applying these safeguards.Safeguards appropriate to future distillations are still under discussion in Brussels in the context of the reform of the wine regime.
Northern Wales (Radioactivity Levels)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is the assessment of his Department of the effect of radioactive discharges from the Windscale plant of British Nuclear Fuels Ltd. on radioactivity levels of the sea along the coast of Northern Wales.
A marine monitoring programme of radioactive discharges is undertaken by my Department and by the site operators. I am satisfied that no group of individuals living along the coast of North Wales is currently exposed to more than a small fraction of the radiation dose limit recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection as a result of discharges from Sellafield—formerly Windscale—and the nuclear power station at Wylfa.
Margarine
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, in view of the high precentage of fish oil being used in margarine, if he will take steps to provide for the ingredients on a package of margarine to be identified on the packaging; and if he will make a statement.
We shall be reviewing the regulations governing the composition and labelling of margarine in the light of the recently published report of the food standards committee on margarine and other table spreads. I shall bear in mind the point my hon. Friend has made.
Intervention Board (Disposal Policy)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, further to his answer of 2 April, Official Report c. 210, if he has now obtained from the Commission the information in relation to the amount of food, fish and wine which was destroyed or otherwise disposed of by each of the other member States of the European Economic Community in 1981; and if he will publish the figures in the Official Report.
| Butter | Cheese | |||
| Year | Tonnes | Percentage of total United Kingdom supply | Tonnes | Percentage of total United Kingdom supply |
| 1971 | 146,700 | 30·9 | 71,408 | 19·0 |
| 1972 | 117,700 | 24·8 | 64,315 | 16·5 |
| 1973 | 130,895 | 25·9 | 47,344 | 11·7 |
| 1974 | 117,358 | 20·9 | 16,600 | 4·0 |
| 1975 | 110,790 | 18·4 | 30,300 | 6·6 |
| 1976 | 130,980 | 22·9 | 30,600 | 6·8 |
| 1977 | 137,713 | 24·6 | 13,200 | 3·1 |
| 1978 | 125,000 | 21·1 | 2,076 | 0·5 |
| 1979 | 119,503 | 22·3 | 101 | 0·03 |
| 1980 | 107,971 | 22·9 | 7,149 | 1·6 |
Footnote: Due to differences in recording practices, some of these figures do not correspond exactly to the entitlements allowed for under the arrangements operated by the European Community.
Council Of Agriculture Ministers
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the outcome of the Council of Agriculture Ministers meeting in Brussels on 10–11 May; and if he will make a statement.
I refer my hon. Friend to the statement which I made in the House earlier today.
European Community
Harmonisation Agreements
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the harmonisation agreements that have been established between the United Kingdom and the EEC, collectively and individually, since the United Kingdom signed the Treaty of Accession.
All European Community harmonisation measures are published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. The largest group of agreements are those directives, adopted under article 100 of the Treaty, which are intended to eliminate technical barriers to Trade. Parliament, through the scrutiny procedure, is given an opportunity to study such directives before their adoption. All such directives are listed in the 23 April 1982 edition of British Business, published by the Departments of Trade and Industry. I am sending a copy to the right hon. Gentleman, marked to indicate the directives already adopted.
The information has not yet been obtained from the Commission.
Butter And Cheese
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how much (a) butter and (b) cheese were imported into the United Kingdom from New Zealand for each of the past 10 years; and what percentage these imports constitute of total United Kingdom supply, including domestic production.
The quantities of butter and cheese imported into the United Kingdom from New Zealand as recorded by Her Majesty's Customs and Excuse during the period 1971–1980 and the percentages the se imports represented of total supply were as follows:
National Finance
Land Registry
44.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will increase the number of civil servants in the Land Registry.
Provision has been made for the number of civil servants in the Land Registry to increase by 255 in 1982–83.
Input Costs
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what proportion of the input costs of (a) manufacturing, (b) industrial output other than minimum list heading 104 and (c) goods and services is accounted for by (i) goods and services supplied by the nationalised industries other than the British National Oil Corporation and (ii) the public sector generally.
I refer the hon. Member to the 1974 input-output tables for the United Kingdom—Business Monitor-PA 1044—where a breakdown of input purchases by industry is given.
European Community (Finance Council)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement about the meeting of the European Community Finance Council in Brussels on 11 May.
The Budget Council met on 11 May; I represented the United Kingdom. The Council considered and agreed the position it should adopt in discussions with the European Parliament on the classification of expenditure and certain other aspects of the budgetary procedure. The objective of the present discussions is to reach agreement on procedures, which should pave the way for finding an agreed solution to the 1982 budget dispute and avoid disagreements occurring in the future over the adoption of the Community budget.
National Insurance
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what proportion of (a) employer's and (b) employee's national insurance contributions, less the pension element, is contributed by the public sector.
I have been asked to reply.The best estimate using 1979–80 data—the latest available—is that 30 per cent. respectively of the revenue from
(a) employers and (b) employees national insurance contributions, excluding the national insurance surcharge, was paid by the public sector. No part of the national insurance contribution is specifically allocated as a pension element.
Development Land Tax
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what were the annual administration costs of the Development Land Tax Office in each of the last three years.
[pursuant to his reply, 11 May 1982, c. 214]: The latest estimates of these costs for the years 1979–80 to 1981–82 are:
| £ million | |
| 1979–80 | 1·261 |
| 1980–81 | 1·319 |
| 1981–82 | 1·304 |
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what proportion of the yield from development land tax in 1980–82 was attributable to deemed disposals; and what was the yield from actual disposals.
[pursuant to his reply, 11 May 1982, c. 214]: I regret that the information on which to base a more precise estimate is not readily available and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. The proportion attributable to deemed disposals is probably of the order of 20 per cent.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the expected total yield from development land tax in the finacial years (a) 1981–82 and (b) 1982–83.
[pursuant to his reply, 11 May 1982, c. 214]: The figures are as follows:
Overseas Development
Zimbabwe
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what support has been given by Her Majesty's Government towards the building of a rehabilitation centre for limbless ex-Servicemen in Zimbabwe; how much money has been allocated to the project; what representations he has received from the British Limbless Ex-Servicemen's Association on the matter; and if he will make a statement.
The British Limbless Ex-Servicemen's Association made a number of representations last year on the need for assistance to the limbless in Zimabawe.The Zimbabwe Government have not asked us for financial support for a rehabilitation centre. However, they did ask us last year to consider the need for a chief orthopaedic technician for the Parirenyatwa hospital in Harare and, at the same time, to assess a proposal from the Zimbabwe Ministry of Health for the construction of a national rehabilitation centre.The expert's report recommended that as the Zimbabwe Ministry of Labour and Social Services was already constructing a new rehabilitation centre—at an estimated cost of $ (Zimbabwe) 6 million—it would be appropriate for the Ministry of Health to colloborate with this project rather than to build a second centre. The requirement for a chief orthopaedic technician was confirmed and a suitable candidate is being sought for appointment under our technical co-operation arrangements.
Energy
Hydroelectric Generating Plants
asked the Secretary of State for Energy, in the light of the report by Professor Wilson of Salford university, whether his Department has any plans for constructing small-scale hydroelectric generating plants in Wales; what locations are under consideration; what system of control would be developed for them; and what would be the distribution plans for any electricity thus produced.
The Department has no plans for constructing small-scale hydroelectric generating plant in Wales, this being the responsibility of individual site owners or the electricity board.However, following the publication of the Salford university report to establish the practical potential of low head hydro in Wales, Salford university was asked by the Department to carry out a further study. The object of this study is to identify specific schemes in England and Wales to establish their economics and their suitability for the demonstration of the latest technology. This work is still in progress.
Domestic Heating
asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will estimate the percentage of heat that a house in Glasgow requires to maintain it at a comfortable temperature compared with an identical house in Dumfries, taking into account air temperature, wind exposure, rain and sunshine.
It is estimated that a house in Glasgow requires 103 per cent. of the heating energy of a similar house in Dumfries which is similarly sited and heated to the same standard after taking account of differences in air temperature, wind exposure, rain and sunshine.
North Sea Oil (Depletion Policy)
asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will list the North Sea development approvals between Hutton in August 1980 and Central Cormorant in April 1982; and whether the rate of approvals reflects any change in Her Majesty's Government's depletion policy.
The last new development programme to 'be approved was that for Hutton in August 1980. Drainage of the central area of the Cormorant reservoir through an underwater manifold centre is part of the development programme of the South Cormorant field which commenced operations in December 1979. Depletion policy remains as set out in the statement by the then Secretary of State for Energy on 23 July 1980.
Marcoule Nuclear Reactor (Leakage)
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what information he has received from the French authorities about the recent malfunction of their experimental nuclear reactor at Marcoule involving sodium leakage.
[pursuant to his reply, 10 May, c. 171]: The United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority has been advised by the French authorities that there was an incident at their experimental nuclear reactor at Marcoule, called Phenix, which started with a small leak of steam from a reheater tube of one of the three secondary sodium cooling circuits. It was detected by instruments installed for this purpose. The reactor was shut down. Some 24 hours later there was a small leak of sodium into the steam side causing a minor fire which was rapidly extinguished. Substantial provision is made in the design of the Phenix reactor for dealing with leaks of steam or water into the sodium. Any damage to the plant is thought to have been confined to the affected steam generator unit. The French authorities have emphasised that there have been no significant external effects of this leak.
Environment
Public Information Films (Industrial Action)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what public information films he has produced for the purpose of advising householders of their rights to buy council houses or to qualify for grant aid for home improvements so far have not been seen on television because of blacking by members of the Association of Cinematograph, Television and Allied Technicians.
Showings of a television advertisement for the Department's "Right to Buy" booklet have been partially affected by the industrial action to which my hon. Friend refers. Publicity for the new rates of home improvement grant announced by my right hon. and learned Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer in his Budget Statement will be by way of newspaper rather than television advertisements.
Water Charges
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish a table showing for each water authority the percentage increase in charges for domestic water consumers between 1973–74 and the present financial year.
The following table shows the percentage increase in the average households bill for water services for the period from 1974–75 to 1982–83.
| Percentage increase | |
| Authority | per cent. |
| North-West | 251·3 |
| Northumbrian | 300·4 |
| Severn-Trent | 239·7 |
| Yorkshire | 302·8 |
| Anglian | 230·9 |
| Thames | 252·7 |
| Southern | 186·0 |
| Wessex | 250·9 |
| South-West | 233·0 |
| Welsh | 246·1 |
Council House Sales
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many council houses have been sold so far by each housing authority on Merseyside and by West Lancashire district council.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my hon. Friend the Under-Secretary of State to my hon. Friend the Member for Paddington (Mr. Wheeler) on 6 April 1982.—[Vol. 21, c. 321.]
Elderly Persons Dwellings
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many applications to purchase local authority elderly persons dwellings have been referred to him for determination under schedule 1 to the Housing Act 1980; in how many of these the right-to-buy has been granted; in how many cases the right-to-buy has been refused; and how many cases are still outstanding.
As at 30 April 1982 the Department had received 1,739 applications from landlords under this provision. The breakdown is as follows:
| Applications submitted out of time | 183 |
| No decision required (following withdrawal of either party) | 358 |
| Dwellings excluded from the right-to-buy | 68 |
| Dwellings included in the right-to-buy | 357 |
| Applications still under consideration | 273 |
| 1,739 |
Nature Conservancy Council
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how much money he proposes to allocate during the current financial year to the Nature Conservancy Council for compensation payments in connection with the establishment of sites of special scientific interest in England and Wales.
I refer my hon. Friend to the answer given to the hon. Member for Stockport, North (Mr. Bennett) on 17 February.—[Vol. 18, c. 279.]
Countryside Commission
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how much money he proposes to allocate during the current financial year to the Countryside Commission for management agreements.
Subject to the approval of Parliament, the Countryside Commission's grant-in-aid for the current financial year will amount to £10·834 million. The grant-in-aid will cover the whole range of the commission's activities and no part of it has been specially allocated for purposes related to management agreements.
Architectural Competitions (Exhibitions)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will arrange for an exhibition relating to achitectural competitions to be displayed in the Upper Waiting Hall.
I understand that arrangements have been made with the House authorities for the exhibition to be held in the Upper Waiting Hall from 17 to 21 May.
Urban Aid Programme
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the criteria and allocation of the additional urban programme money for each authority of the £70 million announced at the beginning of April.
Guidance notes on the new arrangements will be issued soon. Bids for assistance will be competitive against the total resources available. I hope to make decisions on the bids received within three months of the closing date for applications, due in September.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what are the criteria on which urban programme money is allocated between programme and partnership authorities and urban development corporations and other authorities designated under the Inner Urban Areas Act 1978.
There are no simple criteria on which we base resource allocations to local authorities under the urban programme, but we take account of such factors as the scale, concentration and nature of the problems in the areas concerned, the quality of authorities' proposals for tackling those problems, and their performance in previous years. Resources for urban development corporations, which do not form part of the urban programme, are allocated separately taking account of the corporations' proposals for dealing with the severe problems they face in securing the regeneration of their areas.
Priority Estates Project
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what progress is being made with his Department's priority estates project.
My Department has today published "Priority Estates Project 1982: a summary of aims and progress". This very valuable report by Anne Power, one of the Department's consultants for this project, describes how three difficult to let estates in Bolton, Hackney and Lambeth are being turned round and made much more acceptable to tenants. The report is being made available to all local authorities and copies have been placed in the Library. I hope it will be widely read and acted upon.
Greater London Council (County Hall Roof Display)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what planning consents were required and obtained by the Greater London Council to display announcements from the roof of county hall.
As far as I know, no planning consent was sought or obtained for this purpose, but it would be for the Greater London Council in the first instance to decide whether consent was needed and it has powers to grant itself permission.
Planning Appeals
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many appeals were made to him in 1981 from each district council area in the counties of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire against planning refusals; in how many of these cases refusal was upheld by him; in how many instances the decision was reversed; and in how many instances the appeals were (a) withdrawn or (b) remained undecided.
I regret that the information required is not readily available. Intake figures are only available by county. They are as follows, for 1981:—
| Berkshire | 459 |
| Buckinghamshire | 315 |
| Oxfordshire | 305 |
| Appeals received, withdrawn and decided, 1981 | |
| Number | |
| Appeals in hand 1 January | 8,746 |
| Received | 16,637 |
| Withdrawn | 3,305 |
| Decided | 14,451 |
| In hand 31 December | 7,627 |
| Local Authority decision reversed | 33 per cent. |
Warren Spring Laboratory
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what financial support was given to the air pollution division at the Warren Spring laboratory for each of the last three years at constant prices; and what is the value of the contract for 1982–83.
[pursuant to his answer, 10 May1982]: The payments by DOE for air pollution work at Warren Spring laboratory were as follows:
| £ million | ||
| Cash terms | at 1981–82 prices | |
| 1979–80 | 1·05 | *1·6 |
| 1980–81 | 1·3 | 1·42 |
| 1981–82 | 1·37 | 1·37 |
* A new basis for charging overheads was introduced in 1980–81. In order to show the trend on a consistent basis the figure for 1979–80 has been calculated on the same basis, allowing also for inflation.
It is expected that the payment for 1982–83 will be £1·3 million at 1982–83 prices.
Air Pollution
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will give details of any discussions in which his Department is participating at present taking place in Europe on the question of reducing air pollution.
[pursuant to his reply, 11 May 1982]: My Department is currently engaged in discussions within the European Community on proposals for:A directive for air quality standards for leadA decision on the exchange of information on air pollutionA decision regarding chlorofluorocarbons in the environmentIt is also participating in the discussions of an ad hoc working group on air pollution from motor vehicles. In the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe my Department is involved in discussions on the long range transmission of air pollution.
Photographic Museum (Bradford)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether his Department is supporting the application by Bradford council for EEC regional fund assistance towards the photographic museum to be established in Bradford; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his answer, 6 May 1982, c. 115]: We have not so far felt able to put this project forward because we have had other projects of higher priority, bearing in mind the criteria governing the funds operation. But we shall look at it again, in the context of fresh applications to be made to the Commission.
Social Services
Depo-Provera
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services why he has rejected the advice of the Committee on Safety of Medicines to approve Depo-Provera for contraceptive use; and if he will make a statement.
The licensing authority has given very careful consideration to the advice of the Committee on Safety of Medicines that Depo-Provera should be licensed as a long-term contraceptive. The authority, however, is of the view that in these circumstances the risk of using Depo-Provera appears to outweigh the benefit from such use. It considers that it is particularly important that, in a case such as this, the risk/benefit ratio should be clearly favourable. The committee's recommendation, on the other hand, had been a very guarded one. It had also advised that the administration of the drug should be restricted to a group of women many of whom would have difficulty in giving informed consent to their treatment.The licensing authority therefore proposes to refuse the licence application. The company however has the right to make representations in writing or at a hearing before a person appointed for the purpose by the licensing authority in respect of this proposal.
Claimants (Ormskirk)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list in the Official Report for each of his Department's local offices serving the Ormskirk constituency the current number of non-pensioner and pensioner claimants; and if he will give comparable figures for 1979, 1980 and 1981.
The information requested is as follows:
| Number of non-pensioner and pensioner claimants at offices dealing with the Ormskirk constituency | ||||
| Office | 16 March 1982 | 17 March 1981 | 18 March 1980 | 20 March 1979 |
| Supplementary Benefits Office | ||||
| Bootle AO | ||||
| Non-pensioners | 8,982 | 7,638 | 6,039 | 6,336 |
| Pensioners | 5,023 | 5,202 | 5,199 | 5,188 |
| Crosby ILO | ||||
| Non-pensioners | 5,504 | 4,302 | 3,370 | 3,344 |
| Pensioners | 3,437 | 3,402 | 3,337 | 3,347 |
| Kirkby ILO | ||||
| Non-pensioners | 8,451 | 6,192 | 5,309 | 5,391 |
| Pensioners | 2,348 | 1,748 | 1,699 | 1,714 |
| St. Helens ILO | ||||
| Non-pensioners | 9,176 | 7,112 | 5,318 | 5,431 |
| Pensioners | 5,777 | 5,633 | 5,724 | 5,834 |
| Skelmersdale ILO | ||||
| Non-pensioners | 5,560 | 4,180 | 3,393 | 3,303 |
| Pensioners | 2,507 | 2,441 | 2,499 | 2,442 |
| Contributory Benefits Office | ||||
| Bootle NIO | ||||
| Non-pensioners | 2,399 | 3,028 | 3,373 | 4,634 |
| Pensioners | 340 | 338 | 359 | 380 |
| Crosby ILO | ||||
| Non-pensioners | 1,140 | 1,165 | 1,533 | 2,027 |
| Pensioners | 226 | 118 | 244 | 209 |
| Kirkby ILO | ||||
| Non-pensioners | 1,278 | 1,213 | 1,582 | 2,277 |
| Pensioners | 155 | 113 | 108 | 115 |
| St. Helens ILO | ||||
| Non-pensioners | 3,551 | 3,946 | 5,108 | 5,978 |
| Pensioners | 569 | 582 | 572 | 609 |
| Skelmersdale ILO | ||||
| Non-pensioners | 1,453 | 1,516 | 1,722 | 2,342 |
| Pensioners | 204 | 188 | 231 | 236 |
National Health Service (Land Sales)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many sports grounds and playing fields were sold as surplus to requirements by the National Health Service in the last year.
None.
Family Practitioner Committees
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he is in a position to publish any investigations carried out by Sir Derek Rayner into the efficiency of the working and financing of family practitioner committees.
No. The start of this study was unavoidably delayed and so far only preliminary work has been undertaken.
Consultant Treatment (Waiting Time)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if his Department will investigate the procedure by which consultants recall their patients for review in order to increase selectivity and consequently enable patients on waiting lists for first appointments to be seen appreciably sooner, so reducing waiting time.
Decisions about follow-up appointments are for the clinical judgment of the doctor concerned. I am not convinced that an investigation by the Department is justified, though we are always ready to consider specific evidence about ways in which performance can be improved.
Kidney Patients
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) in view of the fact that over half of the patients who develop renal failure are over 55 years of age, if he will provide more resources so that a greater percentage of people of this age can be given modern treatments;(2) if he is satisfied with the present management of end-stage renal failure in the United Kingdom in view of the fact that only five-eights of such patients receive transplants or renal dialysis; if he is satisfied with the number and distribution of renal units; and if he will seek to provide more funds and facilities.
The annual number of patients starting treatment for chronic renal failure in the United Kingdom has increased steadily, but there are still not sufficient facilities to meet all the estimated needs. Most of the shortfall is in the older age groups, though in the past few years the number of older patients accepted has increased appreciably. I am not satisfied with the present level of services, but the priority to be given to expanding them is primarily for health authorities to judge. The number of transplants is constrained mainly by the supply of donor kidneys and we are continuing our efforts to improve this. As regards additional resources, I refer the hon. Member to the reply he received from my hon. Friend the Member for Reading, South (Dr. Vaughan) on 3 February 1982.—[Vol. 17, c. 159.]
Medical Graduates
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he has studied the report by the Irish Medical Association that medical school intake should be halved and that every EEC country was over-producing medical graduates; and if he will reconsider the rate of medical student entry in the United Kingdom.
I am not aware of a report such as that to which the hon. Member refers but I would not accept that the United Kingdom is over-producing medical graduates.
St Helens And Knowsley Community Health Council
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if, in view of the fact that the St. Helens and Knowsley community health council serves two metropolitan district councils, he will increase the size of its membership.
The size of community health councils is for regional health authorities to determine in line with the guidance we issue. I understand the St. Helens and Knowsley district councils will each appoint four members to the community health council covering their districts, which will have 20 members in all.
Bust Enlargement Operations
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many bust enlargement operations were performed for National Health Service patients during each of the most recent five years for which figures are available.
This information is not collected centrally.
Mobility Allowance
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many mobility allowance cases have been approved in (a) England and Wales and (b) Scotland under the criteria of regulation 3(1)(b) of the Mobility Allowance Regulations 1975.
This information is not available.
Terminally Ill Patients (Staff Training)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether there have been any studies carried out within the Health Service on the training to be given to medical staff in the emotional care of the terminally ill, similar to those existing with the hospice movement.
I am not aware of any studies made within the National Health Service, but the publication in 1980 of the report of the Standing Medical Advisory Committee's working group on terminal care has stimulated attention to the needs of the dying and their families. It recommended that the training of doctors and nurses should place greater emphasis on the care of such patients, including the emotional aspects. A range of training opportunities is available in this field.
Effective Prescribing (Report)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish his Department's report on effective prescribing.
My right hon. Friend is still considering the report produced by the informal working group on effective prescribing.
Benefits
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what would be the net additional cost in 1982–83 of raising child benefit to £11·70 per week per child (a) if the benefit were subject to tax at the basic rate and (b) if the benefit were subject to tax at each taxpayer's top rate.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will amend regulation 19 of the Social Security Act 1975 in order to recognise the predicament of unemployed people in areas with seasonal work, and to ensure that genuinely unemployed people do not lose unemployment benefit in winter by virtue of their taking up seasonal jobs in the summer.
My right hon. Friend is satisfied that additional conditions for receipt of unemployment benefit by seasonal workers are necessary to ensure that benefit is not paid to those seasonal workers who are not in employment during their off-seasons. The National Insurance Advisory Committee considered the seasonal worker rules and concluded, in 1977, that additional conditions were still neeeded for that purpose and that it was not possible to distinguish between those who deliberately adopt a seasonal pattern of work and others who become seasonal workers while still trying to obtain regular employment. The committee recommended, however, certain changes in the rules. The last Administration did not implement them because of the cost involved and, with the need to make savings in social security expenditure, we have had to postpone a decision about their implementation.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the latest number of recipients of supplementary pension or allowance and family income supplement; what is the estimated number of their dependants; how many persons would be entitled to claim certificates of exemption on income grounds from prescription charges; and how many have claimed certificates of exemption on grounds of low income for ophthalmic or dental treatment.
[pursuant to his reply, 19 April 1982, c. 43]: Provisional estimates are now available of the numbers dependent on supplementary benefit at December 1981. These are shown in the table below, together with the estimated numbers dependent on family income supplement at that date.
| Estimated number of beneficiaries and their dependants in Great Britain at December 1981 | ||
| Recipients | Dependants | |
| Supplementary pension | 1·7 million | 0·3 million |
| Supplementary allowance | 2·0 million | 2·1 million |
| Family income supplement | 132,000 | 351,000 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if it is his policy that workers on short-time working, that is two weeks at work and one week off for which they receive unemployment pay, should not receive supplementary benefit; under what circumstances social security officers are using regulation 9(2)(D) of the Supplementary Benefit (Resources) Regulation 1981 and not regulation 9(2)(A); if he is satisfied that the practice in applying the regulations is consistent between social security offices; and if he will instruct social security officers to cease applying regulation 9(2)(D) in these cases and take steps retrospectively to reimburse those workers who have been deprived of benefit.
[pursuant to his reply, 26 April 1982, c. 213]: The Department's policy is that a person who is on short-time working and is receiving either unemployment benefit or payments under the temporary short-time working compensation scheme should be able to receive supplementary benefit if he is not working more than an average of 30 hours a week—35 for certain disabled people—and his average income is less than his supplementary benefit level. The regulations are designed to achieve this end.The chief supplementary benefit officer, who is responsible for advising supplementary benefit officers on the interpretation and application of the law, has advised that, in taking into account earnings—including short-time working payments—of a person on short-time working, resources regulation 9(2)(D) should be used, rather than regulation 9(2)(A). I have no power to intervene or to instruct supplementary benefit officers, but this advice is consistent with the Department's policy. It follows the practice of the former Supplementary Benefits Commission, the broad purpose of which—together with the averaging of hours worked—was to ensure equality of treatment between those working whole weeks on and whole weeks off and those working part of each week.We are not aware that the regulations are being applied inconsistently, but I understand that the chief supplementary benefit officer will be issuing further guidance designed to re-affirm his advice.
Employment
Prison Officers
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will give figures for the number of unemployed prison officers.
At 11 March there were 48 unemployed people registered at employment offices in the United Kingdom for employment as prison officers.
Visiting Orchestras Consultative Association
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the cost to public funds of the Visiting Orchestras Consultative Association; what secretariat support is provided by his Department; and whether he will publish the minutes of the association and its executive committee.
The income of the Visiting Orchestras Consultative Association is derived from subscriptions of £46·75 per annum per member plus a service charge of £1·50 per concert payable by the member submitting the proposed visit by an overseas orchestra to the association for its views. There is therefore a cost to public funds as a result of there being local authority members of the association, but not otherwise. My Department provides no secretarial assistance to the association. The minutes of the meetings of the association and its executive committee are not confidential and are circulated to all members of the association and to the Department. Wider circulation is a matter for the association.
Plymouth Engineering Training Centre
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will give details of the intake of unemployed youngsters taking part in courses at the Plymouth engineering training centre; and if he is satisfied with their progress.
In the course of the last academic year about 80 unemployed youngsters received training at the Plymouth engineering training centre. At present eight are undergoing training. Reasonable progress has been made: about 38 per cent. of the trainees achieved a sufficiently high standard in the basic engineering course to go on to the advanced course.
Youth Opportunities Programme
asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) how many young people eligible to take part in the youth opportunities programme are not doing so (a) in the Portsmouth travel-to-work area and (b) on Portsea Island;(2) how many vacant places are on offer on the youth opportunities programme
(a) in the Portsmouth travel-to-work area and (b) on Portsea Island.
I regret that the information is not available at present, but I shall reply to my hon. Friend as soon as possible.
Transport
British Rail (Chairman)
12.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he next plans to meet the chairman of British Railways to discuss the future financing needs of British Railways with particular reference to the introduction of flexible rostering.
13.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he next expects to meet the chairman of British Railways to discuss investment in the railways.
I meet the chairman frequently to discuss matters of mutual interest.
London Transport
15.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make funds available specifically to ensure that London Transport services which lie outside the Greater London Council area are not subjected to closure or reductions in service as a result of economies made by the Greater London Council following the judgment of the House of Lords.
It is for the county councils in whose areas the services operate to decide whether to provide financial support for them. My right hon. Friend has told the GLC to prepare plans for 1983 on the assumption of a level of subsidy similar to that reflected in the transport supplementary grant settlement this year. I see no need, therefore, for the draconian economies and massive closures or reductions in services put about in alarmist GLC propaganda.
39.
Cox asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he is due to hold his meeting with the chairman of the Greater London Council transport committee to discuss future Government help to Greater London Council transport services.
I have had several meetings with both members and officials of the GLC to discuss this issue and am always ready for future meetings. Meanwhile, I am awaiting the plan I have asked the GLC to prepare urgently, taking as a guideline the level of resources indicated in my allocation of TSG to London this year.
Rail Closures
16.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he has received any further proposals for the closure of rail services; and if he will make a statement.
No further proposals have come before my right hon. Friend beyond those that I listed in my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Skipton (Mr. Watson) and the hon. Member for Whitehaven (Dr. Cunningham) on 1 April.
British Rail Finances
17.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he has yet received the report he has commissioned on the future of British Railways' finances from Mr. James Butler.
I do not expect to receive Mr. Butler's report until mid-July.
28.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he is yet in a position to announce the name of the chairman of the review into the finances of British Railways.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer that my right hon. Friend gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Louth (Mr. Brotherton) on 5 May.—[Vol. 23, c. 83.]
33.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he will make a statement about British Railways' future financial position following the publication of the board's annual report.
The annual report and accounts for 1981 indicate the seriousness of the board's financial situation. The chairman's commentary makes clear just how much this has been made worse by the ASLEF dispute earlier in the year, and highlights the need for progress in modernising working practices.
Motec Livingston
18.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether, pursuant to the answer on 7 April to the hon. Member for West Lothian, Official Report, c. 941, the Under-Secretary of State has been able to arrange a visit to MOTEC road transport industry training board, Livingston, before any final decision for closure is taken.
A senior official of my Department visited the establishment on 13 April and, following that visit, I wrote to the hon. Member on 29 April.
British Rail (Branch Line Investment)
19.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he has received representations from British Railways specifically for capital investment in new forms of diesel unit and rolling stock for use on branch lines.
We have recently received from the Railways Board a request for authority to build 40 lightweight diesel multiple units as the first stage in a replacement programme; my right hon. Friend is studying this application carefully.
British Railways Board (Asset Sales)
21.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will take steps to ensure that when the British Railways Board sells off assets, pursuant to Government policy, adequate steps are taken to ensure that the public are made aware of the sales taking place and the best price is obtained in every case.
The British Railways Board is responsible for devising the best way of disposing of assets no longer needed for running the railway. I understand that it is the board's practice to advertise the sale of properties where appropriate in the national press, technical journals and in local papers.
New Dock, Falmouth
22.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what representations he has received objecting to the building of the new dock at Falmouth; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend has received and noted representation from the 6/561 branch of the Transport and General Workers' Union opposing the proposed new port development at Falmouth. This scheme is one that requires his authorisation under section 9 of the Harbours Act 1964. He is currently considering the promoters' application and will take account of all relevant considerations in reaching a decision.
Royal Docks
23.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what approaches he has had from the London dockland development corporation concerning the future of the royal docks.
None to me. Nor would I expect an approach because the future development of these and other redundant docks is a matter best pursued by the authorities most directly concerned, the Port of London Authority, the development corporation and the local authorities. I understand that they are already in touch.
Heavy Goods Vehicle Businesses (Licensing)
24.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement as to the criteria to be adopted for the licensing of heavy goods vehicle businesses.
The Transport Act 1968 lays down the criteria that the licensing authorities must take into account in considering an application for a road haulage operator's licence. Proposals in the Transport Bill now before the House will extend these criteria to include environmental considerations.
Burscough Bypass
25.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he anticipates that a start will be made on the bypass of Burscough.
It is too early to say when construction might begin but design work will resume soon. The bypass is in the reserve list of schemes to start from 1986 onwards.
Cornton And Bridge Of Allan (Level Crossing)
26.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to reply to the correspondence from the hon. Member for West Stirlingshire about the railway level crossing between Cornton and Bridge of Allan.
A reply was sent on 30 April 1982.
British Railways Board (External Financing Limits)
27.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what indications he has received from the British Railways Board about its ability to operate within its external financing limits; and if he will make a statement.
It is for the British Railways Board to operate within the external financing limits laid down.
Settle-Carlisle (Rail Services)
29.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what proposals he has received from the British Railways Board on the future of rail services on the Settle-Carlisle line since his reply to the hon. Member for Keighley (Mr. Cryer) on 7 April, Official Report, column 942; and if he will make a statement.
Since 7 April, I have received no proposals from the Railways Board about rail services on the Settle-Carlisle line; I have nothing to add to my statement on that occasion.
Holyhead
30.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will seek a meeting with representatives of British Railways and other interested parties to discuss the future of railways and shipping services to and from Holyhead.
The provision of rail and shipping services are a matter for British Rail and the other transport operators involved. There are frequent and regular rail-connected ferry services from Holyhead and I see no reason to seek a meeting.
Public Transport Grants
31.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what was the total amount of central Government grants for public transport in the major conurbations for each of the past five years.
With permission I will publish the figures in the Official Report.In deciding the allocation of transport supplementary grant it has been our objective to make it possible for the PTEs to maintain a reasonable level of services in their areas, given realistic fare policies. But we will not provide Government money to support extravagant policies that shift the burden of public transport costs unfairly from the passenger to the ratepayer and the taxpayer.
Following are the figures:
Central Government provide support for public transport mainly in the form of transport supplementary grant. The total of this grant paid to the GLC and metropolitan counties was:
Year
| £ million |
| 1977–78 | 186·5 |
| 1978–79 | 197·5 |
| 1979–80 | 214·0 |
| 1980–81 | 238·1 |
| 1981–82 | 295·3 |
These payments represented grant at a rate of 70 per cent. above a per capita threshold in respect of the total transport expenditure accepted by the Secretary of State. The grant covered expenditure on highways as well as public transport but of the total accepted expenditure the following percentages represented revenue support to bus and rail services:
Year
| per cent.
|
| 1977–78 | 27·2 |
| 1978–79 | 27·8 |
| 1979–80 | 27·3 |
| 1980–81 | 28·6 |
| 1981–82 | 27·0 |
In addition some of the capital expenditure accepted for TSG was public transport capital expenditure—but it is not possible to distinguish this. British Rail services in London benefit from part of the Government's general public service obligation grant to BR passenger services.
There were also specific Government grants to public transport operators in London and the metropolitan counties, in the form of new bus grant and fuel duty rebate. Taken together these amounted to:
Year
| £ million |
| 1977–78 | 40·8 |
| 1978–79 | 43·9 |
| 1979–80 | 45·9 |
| 1980–81 | 56·3 |
| 1981–82 | 59·4 |
Local authority expenditure on public transport is also, like local authority expenditure, supported by the rate support grant. Since this is a block grant to all local authority expenditure it is not possible to say how much should be attributed to public transport.
Heavy Lorries
32.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will estimate the date on which he expects that the heaviest lorries proposed to be introduced will meet their full track costs; and if he will make a statement.
The Government's approach to the taxation of any new heavier lorries that Parliament might approve will be announced as part of our overall strategy for controlling heavy lorries. Our general policy is that all classes of lorry should at least meet their road costs.
Road Building (Private Finance)
34.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what are the possible methods of tapping private finance for road building which he is considering; what are the advantages and disadvantages of each; and if he will make a statement.
I see advantages in increasing the diversity of funding for road building if we can attract genuine private sector finance at reasonable cost. The most hopeful method, at least in the immediate future, involves private funding of construction paid for by royalties on the use of the road. We shall very shortly be consulting the construction industry and others to see whether such a scheme can be developed for trunk roads that meets the needs of all concerned.
Road Resurfacing
35.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many miles of non-motorway trunk roads will be resurfaced in 1982; and how this compares with the figure for 1978.
In 1982–83 we are planning to spend £36 million repairing the surface of non-motorway trunk roads. Because of the variation both in the number of lanes to be resurfaced and in methods of repairs, a count of the mileage would have little meaning and no such figure is available.
Road Damage (Severe Weather)
36.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether any estimate has been made of the cost of making good the damage to all categories of road by the severe winter weather.
It is too early to assess the full effect of the severe weather on all categories of road. Many local authorities have yet to complete their surveys and estimates.
Vehicle Excise Duty (Evasion)
37.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he is satisfied with his Department's procedures for dealing with vehicle excise duty evasion.
I share my hon. Friend's concern about evasion. My Department's administration has been reorganised and strengthened and we have received wide police co-operation in our efforts to deter and catch evaders.Local campaigns are all leading to an increase in relicensing and thus revenue, and the apprehension of those who fail to respond to our warnings. We would welcome any suggestions for further initiatives and improved procedures.
British Railways Engineering Ltd
38.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what effects the level of the external financing limit will have on British Railways' subsidiary companies, in particular British Railways Engineering Ltd., in 1982–83 and subsequently.
It is for the board to allocate the resources available to it between the various businesses, as it considers necessary.
Trunk Road Contracts
40.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what is the latest value of trunk road contracts expected to be let in 1982–83.
About £300 million.
Roads (Construction And Improvement)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what is the actual expenditure in 1981–82 on each scheme listed in table 1 of the appendix to 1981–82 Class VI, 1 section of the Supply Estimates; and how this compares with the estimated provisions in each case.
The information is as follows:
| New Construction and Improvement: Motorways and Trunk Roads | ||
| Supply Estimate Provision 1981–82 | Actual Expenditure 1981–82 | |
| £'000 | £'000 | |
| Motorways | ||
| Schemes in progress (contracts let by 31 October 1980) | ||
| M1 London-Yorkshire Motorway | ||
| Breakspear-Berry grove | 11,791 | 10,257 |
| M20 Mid Kent Motorway | ||
| Ashford-Folkestone | 7,083 | 12,983 |
| M25 London Outer Orbital Motorway | ||
| Yeoveny-Airport Spur | 10,211 | 10,060 |
| A10-M11 | 33,452 | 27,646 |
| A12-A13 | 25,047 | 23,574 |
| M11-A12 | 22,129 | 19,979 |
| A111-A10 | 5,668 | 8,749 |
| M63 Manchester Outer Ring Road | ||
| Stockport East/West Bypass, Stage 2 | 3,473 | 3,800 |
| Stockport East/West Bypass, Stages 4/5 | 8,402 | 9,892 |
| M67 Hyde and Demon By-pass Motorway | ||
| Denton Relief Road, Stage 1 | 3,228 | 3,650 |
| M531 Ellesmere Port Motorway | ||
| Southern Extension (100 per cent. Grant Scheme) | 6,540 | 6,709 |
| M602 Salford-Eccles Motorway | ||
| Extension to Salford Docks (100 per cent. Grant Scheme) | 9,170 | 8,146 |
| Proposals to start (contracts let after 31 October 1980) | ||
| M25 London Outer Orbital Motorway | ||
| Chertsey to Reigate-Chertsey to Wisley Section | 10,115 | 5,684 |
| M27 South Coast Motorway | ||
| Chilworth to Hedge End | 9,836 | 2,331 |
| M54 Telford Motorway | ||
| Telford-M6 | 15,866 | 11,543 |
| M65 Calder Valley Route | ||
| Hyndburn-Bumley (including Accrington Easterly Bypass (Northern Section) | 13,753 | 10,255 |
| TRUNK ROADS | ||
| Schemes in progress (contracts let by 31 October 1980) | ||
| Proposed Colchester-Harwich Road | ||
| Colchester Eastern and Elmstead Market Bypass (Essex) | 9,724 | 11,313 |
| London-Tilbury Road | ||
| Mar Dyke-East of Grays (Essex) | 9,733 | 10,369 |
| East of Snaith-Sunderland Road | ||
| Billingham Diversion (Cleveland) | 7,142 | 7,846 |
| London-Canterbury-Dover Road | ||
| Canterbury Southern Bypass (Kent) | 3,168 | 3,768 |
| Winchester-Preston Road | ||
| Kingsworthy-Bullington (Sutton Scotney Bypass) (Hants.) | 5,664 | 5,545 |
| Felixstowe-Weedon and London-Yarmouth Roads | ||
| Ipswich Southern and Eastern Bypass (Suffolk) | 22,416 | 22,495 |
Supply Estimate Provision 1981–82
| Actual Expenditure 1981–82
| |
£'000
| £'000
| |
| Manchester-Burnley Road | ||
| Haslingdon Bypass (Lancashire) | 5,982 | 5,891 |
| Girton-Godmanchester Road | ||
| Bar Hill-Godmanchester (Cambridgeshire) | 3,904 | 1,064 |
| Kendal-Doncaster Road | ||
| Skipton Western and Northern Bypasses (N. Yorkshire) | 5,366 | 5,263 |
Proposals to start (contracts let after 31 October 1980)
| ||
| Sheffield-Grimsby Road | ||
| Brigg-Grimsby (Humberside) | 6,741 | 8,811 |
| London-Carlisle-Glasgow-Inverness Road | ||
| Derby Ring Road | 4,047 | 2,245 |
| London-Fishguard Road | ||
| Gloucester Northern Bypass | 3,812 | 4,746 |
| Manchester-Bumley Road | ||
| Accrington Eastern Bypass (Southern Section) | 101 | — |
| Liverpool-Leeds-Hull Road | ||
| South Docks Road, Hull (Humberside) | 4,945 | 4,252 |
| Total | 288,509 | 268,866 |
The estimates themselves included on off-setting allowance of £10·9 million for work which might not in the events be undertaken in the year, though this covered smaller schemes as well as those costing over £10 million each.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will update with his latest estimates table 2 of the appendix to the 1981–82 Class VI, 1 of the 1981–82 Supply estimates; and if he will publish on the same basis similar figures for 1982–83.
The information is attached:—
| The following is an updated version of table 2 of the appendix to Class VI, 1 of the 1981–82 Supply Estimates: | |||
| Motorways and Trunk Roads | Current estimate of total cost | Expenditure to 31 March 1981 | Actual expenditure in 1981–82 |
| £000 | £000 | £000 | |
| Work in progress at 1 April 1981 on schemes costing more than £1million | 826,713 | 322,740 | 246,051 |
| New schemes proposed to start in 1981–82 costing more than £1million | 439,212 | 13,206 | 85,758 |
| Residual expenditure on completed schemes and preliminary expenditure on land, etc. for future schemes costing £1 million or more | — | — | 48,819 |
| TOTAL | 1,265,925 | 335,946 | 380,628 |
Motorways and Trunk Roads
| Current estimate of total cost
| Expenditure to 31 March 1981
| Actual expenditure in 1981–82
|
£000
| £000
| £000
| |
| Other schemes costing less than £1 million each | — | — | 25,259 |
| Less: Allowance for services which may not be carried out in the year | — | — | — |
| TOTAL—Subhead A1 | 405,887 |
Notes:
(1) The column giving the estimated requirements at survey prices has been omitted because public expenditure figures are now presented solely on a cash basis.
(2) The expenditure figures for 1981–82 are provisional.
The following table gives similar figures for 1982–83
| |||
Motorways and Trunk Roads
| Current estimate of total cost
| Expenditure to 31 March 1982
| Actual expenditure in 1982–83
|
£000
| £000
| £000
| |
| Work in progress at 1 April 1982 on schemes costing more than £1million | 747,622 | 324,783 | 265,826 |
| New schemes proposed to start in 1982–83 costing more than £1million | 636,088 | 12,978 | 116,344 |
| Residual expenditure on completed schemes and preliminary expenditure on land, etc. for future schemes costing £1 million or more | — | — | 68,895 |
| TOTAL | 1,383,710 | 37,761 | 451,065 |
| Other schemes costing less than £1 million each | — | — | 33,489 |
| Less: Allowance for services which may not be carried out in the year | — | — | 10,000 |
| Total—Subhead A1 | 474,554 | ||
Notes:
See note 1 to the previous table.
"Roads, &C England" Vote
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will present in the Official Report estimates for the 1981–82 outturn for each of the following sub-heads of the "Roads, &c. England" Vote (a) new construction and improvement, (b) preparation and supervision, (c) box girder bridges, (d) maintenance, (e) retrospective commission, (f) total (a) to (e), (g) road lighting, (h) road safety, (i) roads, other expenditure, (j) principal and other roads, (k) total (f) to (j), (l) total appropriations in aid and (m) net total, showing in each the provision made in the 1981–82 Supply Estimates and the percentage difference
The information is as follows. The 1981–82 outturn figures are provisional at this stage
| Provision | Provisional Otturn | Provisional Percentage Difference | |
| £ | £ | ||
| (a) New construction and improvement | *479,491,000 | 405,887,326 | *-15 |
| (b) Preparation and supervision | 58,925,000 | 47,413,190 | -20 |
| (c) Box girder bridges | 349,000 | 139,840 | -60 |
| (d) Maintenance | *138,539,000 | 172,186,951 | *+24 |
| (e) Retrospective compensation | 3,270,000 | 824,671 | -75 |
| (f) Total (a)-(e) | 680,574,000 | 626,451,978 | -8 |
| (g) Road lighting | 11,336,000 | 10,857,202 | -4 |
| (h) Road safety | 531,000 | 532,317 | — |
| (i) Roads: other expenditure | 4,513,000 | 2,261,368 | -50 |
| (j) Principal and other roads | 10,148,990 | 11,365,795 | +12 |
| (k) Total (f)-(j) | †707,103,000 | 651,468,660 | -8 |
| (l) Appropriations in aid | -11,707,000 | ‡-11,707,000 | — |
| (m) Net total | 695,396,000 | 639,761,660 | -8 |
| Notes: | |||
| * Early in the financial year £21 million was transferred from new construction to maintenance to allow additional urgent structural maintenance work to be undertaken; | |||
| † This figure includes a token estimate of £10 million for payments from the European regional development fund; | |||
| ‡ Actual appropriations in aid were £17,178,161 (47 per cent. more than the provision), but in accordance with the usual practice, receipts in excess of the voted provision are surrendered to the Consolidated Fund. | |||
Severn Bridge
asked the Secretary of State for Transport on how many days in 1979, 1980, 1981, and in 1982 to the latest date, there have been restrictions on the Severn bridge for repairs and maintenance.
Restrictions have been imposed on the Severn bridge on 43 occasions during the period April to November 1981 for repairs and maintenance. The information for the remaining periods is not available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.Repairs and maintenance are pre-planned and carried out in off peak periods so far as is practicable.
Road Investment (Returns)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what work his Department has conducted into before and after studies of highway schemes which compare estimated with achieved returns on road investment.
In addition to the arrangements now in force for monitoring before and after traffic flows for all new trunk road schemes, my Department has carried out two detailed studies that allow actual and predicted economic benefits to be compared. These were on the A38 Chudleigh bypass and the M25 Godstone-Sevenoaks.
Details of the former were published in 1977 and referred to in the Leitch report. The latter has just been completed and the results will be made available shortly. These studies broadly support our overall evaluations.
Economic Research Projects
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list in the Official Report the transport economic research projects (a) currently being undertaken by his Department and (b) completed since 1980, together with their cost, estimated completion date and brief description.
A large proportion of the Department's research projects, whether carried out by its own staff or externally under contract, include some elements of economic analysis; the attached list is restricted to projects in which the development of economic techniques or the valuation of commodities not normally traded in money terms is a primary objective.
Completed
(1) An initial assessment of the adequancy of data and concepts underlying the values of time currently in use by the Department in forecasting and economic appraisals, and identifying areas for further improvement. Cost £72,000.
(2) Economic evaluation of vehicle delays due to road maintenance, to aid the development of a technique for forecasting life cycle costs of carriageway pavements for different construction and maintenance strategies. Cost £31,000.
(3) Development of a framework for the assessment of local public transport policies, for use by local authorities in allocating support to services in non-metropolitan areas. Cost £171,000.
In progress
(4) Further development and improvement to accident costings and evaluation fundamental to cost benefit analyses, aimed at identifying more precisely the cost placed by society on injury and death. Estimated cost £40,000. Completion: September 1982.
(5) Development and maintenance of a computer program for the economic evaluation of the Department's road programme, including trial applications in the design of several major schemes. Cost—estimated 1980–82—£170,000, continuing.
(6) Evaluation of the effects of different levels of public transport subsidy in a range of metropolitan areas, Cost—estimated 1980–82—£50,000, continuing.
Airedale Route
asked the Secretary of State for Transport on which date in May he now expects to announce a decision on the Airedale route; and what form the announcement will take.
I shall be announcing the Airedale decision before the end of the month. There will be a press release and objectors will be informed.
Road Construction And Maintenance
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what proportion of gross domestic product was devoted to (a) road construction and (b) road maintenance for each member State of the European Community in (i) the latest available calendar year and (ii) 1975.
The latest figures currently available are for 1978.The following table has been derived from figures published in the national accounts of OECD countries and from reports of the Commission of the European Communities on transport expenditure:
| 1975 | 1978 | |||
| country | *New Maintenance | *New Maintenance | ||
| Construction | construction | |||
| Per cent | Per cent | Per cent | Per cent | |
| Belgium | 1·3 | 0·5 | 1·1 | 0·6 |
| Denmark | 0·8 | 0·5 | 0·8 | 0·6 |
| West Germany | 1·4 | 0·3 | 1·2 | 0·3 |
| France | 1·3 | 0·3 | 0·8 | 0·4 |
| Ireland | 0·5 | 0·8 | 0·5 | 0·8 |
| Italy | 0·8 | 0·6 | 0·5 | 0·6 |
| Luxembourg | 2·0 | 1·1 | 1·8 | 1·1 |
| Netherlands | 1·3 | 0·6 | 0·9 | 0·6 |
| United Kingdom | 0·8 | 0·5 | 0·4 | 0·5 |
| * Includes new construction and reconstruction and renewal. | ||||
Parking
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list those road users who have been granted exemptions in the various traffic orders to park on the highway.
Highway authorities have wide discretion to grant exemptions from orders imposing waiting restrictions. Exemptions are normally specified for disabled persons' vehicles under the orange badge scheme, for emergency services, stage carriage and statutory undertakers' vehicles, and in some places for vehicles being loaded or unloaded. Where on-street parking is restricted, special parking facilities are sometimes provided for residents, doctors, disabled persons, diplomats, solo motorcycles, and taxis.