Written Answers To Questions
Wednesday 16 March 1983
Civil Service
Civil Service Unions (Meeting)
38.
asked the Minister for the Civil Service what matters he expects to discuss at his next meeting with the Civil Service unions.
asked the Minister for the Civil Service what subjects he expects to discuss at his next meeting with trade union representatives of the Civil Service.
I hope to meet the CCSU on 30 March to discuss the Civil Service motor mileage allowance arrangements.
Complaints Procedure
39.
asked the Minister for the Civil Service if he will consider making changes to allow civil servants to raise complaints of maladministration with the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration.
No. Civil servants are excluded from the jurisdiction of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration only on personal matters. The Government share the view of successive Administrations that the commissioner was not established to investigate relations between the state as employer and its employees. The means of redress available to civil servants is in no way inferior to those available to workers generally, and it is not considered appropriate for this group to have the right, not available to others, to invoke the parliamentary commissioner's intervention in personal grievances.
Transport
Severn Bridge (Tolls)
16.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what recent representations he has received, and from what bodies, concerning toll charges on the Severn bridge; what reply he has sent; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend received a letter from the Royal Automobile Club which he answered by explaining the Government's continuing intention to recover the full costs of the bridge through tolls.
Humber Bridge
17.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what plans he has to reduce the outstanding debt on the Humber bridge.
Responsibility for the debt rests with the Humber Bridge Board, which has, by statute, 60 years in which to repay all the loans. It is too early to conclude that it will be unable to meet its obligations, particularly if tolls continue to be pitched at a sensible level which takes account of the considerable savings in time and money made by those who use the bridge.
British Rail
21.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what matters he intends to discuss when he next meets the chairman of the British Railways Board.
I shall discuss a number of flatters of mutual interest at my next meeting with the chairman.
Lorries (Mudflaps)
24.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he will now consider bringing in legislation to require lorry manufacturers to fit spray-reducing mudguards and flaps on all heavy vehicles built in the United Kingdom and requiring similar fittings on all imported vehicles.
A committee of the British Standards Institution is currently preparing a technical standard for spray suppression and I shall introduce regulations as soon as that standard is available.The regulations will apply to both United Kingdom-built and imported vehicles.
British Rail (Rolling Stock)
25.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he next expects to meet the chairman of British Rail to discuss investment in new rolling stock.
I frequently meet the chairman of British Railways Board to discuss matters of mutual interest, including plans for investment in new rolling stock.
Roads (Hampshire)
26.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on motorway and trunk road development in Hampshire.
The M27 will be completed next year. We plan to let the main contracts for the construction of the M3 extension to Bar End very shortly and the A34 Whitway diversion this summer. We are generally making good progress on the remaining schemes in the programme.
Drink-Drive Campaign
28.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if, in the light of the control system used over the Christmas-new year period where a drink-drive campaign was confined to certain areas of the country, he is now able to measure the effectiveness of this type of campaign.
The results of the evaluation which we are carrying out should be available in the next 2 to 3 months.
Merseyside
29.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what representations he has received from the Merseyside county council concerning the effects of the proposals in the Transport Bill on levels of fares and services on Merseyside.
The leader of the council wrote to my hon. Friend the Under-Secretary of State on 1 February, and on 24 February the chief executive sent the Department copies of papers that had been put to the council's transport committee.
Serpell Report
30.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to conclude his consideration of the Serpell report.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave earlier today to the hon. Member for Swansea, East (Mr. Anderson).
Road Construction (Private Capital)
31.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what progress has been made concerning the introduction of private capital into the road construction industry.
We are continuing to discuss the practical possibilities and problems involved in the introduction of royalty finance with the Federation of Civil Engineering Contractors and the City.
British Rail Engineering Ltd
32.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a specific provision within the public services obligation grant to British Rail for a sufficient level of investment expenditure to retain a level of orders from British Rail Engineering Ltd. to maintain the existing railway workshop capacity at Shildon, Horwich, Temple Mills and Swindon.
No. The decline in demand for the products of these workshops has arisen because of the changing needs of the railway businesses, and not because of limitations in the funds available for investment.
Transport Supplementary Grant
33.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether the policy used to determine the revenue support element for buses of the transport supplementary grant to form part of the protected expenditure limit under the current Transport Bill will be identical to that used for determining the revenue support element of the transport supplementary grant for the English shire counties; and what is that policy.
In deciding how much revenue support expenditure to accept for transport supplementary grant, whether for a metropolitan county or a shire county, I take account of the public transport needs of the area, and of the likely costs and benefits of the policies and programmes set out in the annual TPP submission.
"The Future Of The Bus"
34.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on the submission from the Bus and Coach Council in its report, "The Future of the Bus".
I refer the hon. Member to the answer which my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Harrow, Central (Sir Anthony Grant) earlier today.
M25 Motorway
35.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he is satisfied that in the surfacing of the M25 the materials and techniques used throughout are such as to keep noise and vibration to a minimum.
Yes.
M40 (Transport Study)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether Colin Buchanan and Partners has begun its study of methods of road and rail investment appraisal with special reference to the Birmingham via Oxford and Reading to the south coast and London-Paddington routes; and whether he will withhold approval of the extension of the M40 until he has considered its report.
Colin Buchanan and Partners began work on a pilot study of the problems of developing a menthodology for appraising rail and trunk road investments on a comparable basis in December 1982. The study, which was commissioned by the Department of Transport at the request of the standing advisory committee on trunk road assessment, is due to finish by the end of March 1983.The work is being based on a case study and because much data are known to exist and some relevant work has already been done in respect of the Oxford-Birmingham corridor it has been selected as the appropriate case. The purpose of the study is, however, to throw light on methodological problems. The more directly relevant question for the M40 inquiry is whether any additional investment in rail projects could seriously affect the return on the M40 scheme. This issue has already been covered in studies by the Department and the British Railways Board which show that substantial improvements in rail services on the Southampton-Oxford-Birmingham route, the west coast main line and the midland main line would have only a very small impact on road traffic in the M40 and M1 corridors and hence on the benefits of the M40.The Colin Buchanan and Partners study will take account of this earlier work but will not in any way supersede it. It is therefore unlikely to have any direct relevance to the inquiry into the extension of the M40.
Road Construction Contracts
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list the 20 contractors who have received the largest share of motorway and trunk road construction contracts in each of the last three years, giving for each contractor the value of the contracts received.
During each of the three years 1980, 1981 and 1982 contracts over £100,000 in value for motorway and trunk road construction in England were awarded as follows:
| £ million | |
| 1980 | |
| 1. Costain Civil Engineering Ltd. | 69 |
£ million
| |
| 2. John Laing Construction Ltd. | 38·2 |
| 3. Tarmac Construction (UK) Ltd. | 36·8 |
| 4. Balfour Beatty Ltd. | 14·8 |
| 5. Dowsett Engineering Construction Ltd. | 12 |
| 6. Sir A. McAlpine and Son Ltd. | 7·5 |
| 7. A. Monk and Co. Ltd. | 1·56 |
| 8. Marples Ridgway Ltd. | 1·3 |
| 9. Sheldon Contracting Co. Ltd. | 0·85 |
| 10. Cumbrian Industrials Ltd. | 0·6 |
| 11. Cornwall CC DLO. | 0·44 |
| 12. Fitzpatrick and Son Ltd. | 0·4 |
| 13. Reed and Mallik Ltd. | 0·39 |
| 14. Allmacadams Ltd. | 0·38 |
| 15. Staffordshire CC DLO. | 0·29 |
| 16. C. J. Pearce and Co. Ltd. | 0·2 |
| 17. Clee Hill Contractors Ltd. | 0·2 |
| 18. Robert Hobbs Ltd. | 0·17 |
| 19. Leicestershire CC DLO. | 0·17 |
| 20. Durham CC DLO. | 0·15 |
1981
| |
| 1. John Laing Construction Ltd. | 48·99 |
| 2. Cementation Construction Ltd. | 44·40 |
| 3. A. Monk and Co. PLC. | 39·69 |
| 4. Tarmac Construction Ltd. | 37·96 |
| 5. Balfour Beatty Ltd. | 24·99 |
| 6. Sir Alfred McAlpine and Son. Ltd. | 20·60 |
| 7. Fairclough Civil Engineering Ltd. | 18·67 |
| 8. A. F. Budge (Contractors) Ltd. | 12·92 |
| 9. Costain Civil Engineering Ltd. | 10·23 |
| 10. John Mowlem and Company PLC. | 8·24 |
| 11. R. M. Douglas Construction Ltd. | 8·09 |
| 12. Miller Construction Northern Ltd. | 7·42 |
| 13. M. J. Gleeson Group PLC. | 6·48 |
| 14. Border Engineering Contractors Ltd. | 5·08 |
| 15. Roadworks (1952) Ltd. | 5·06 |
| 16. Peter Birse Ltd. | 3·08 |
| 17. May Gurney and Co. Ltd. | 2·70 |
| 18. Brims and Co. Ltd. | 2·41 |
| 19. Cumbrian Industrials Ltd. | 2·19 |
| 20. Amey Roadstone Construction Ltd. | 2·18 |
Fairclough Civil Engineering Ltd. and Sir Alfred McAlpine and Son Ltd. in consortium have been awarded one other contract valued at £21·37 million.
£ million
| |
1982
| |
| 1. A. Monk and Co. PLC. | 33·4 |
| 2.Sir Alfred McAlpine and Son Ltd. | 29·9 |
| 3.Tarmac Construction Ltd. | 21·1 |
| 4. John Laing Construction Ltd. | 20·1 |
| 5. John Mowlem and Co. Ltd. | 18·5 |
| 6.Fairclough Civil Engineering Ltd. | 15·5 |
| 7.Balfour Beatty Ltd. | 14·1 |
| 8. Cementation Construction Ltd. | 9·5 |
| 9.Norwest Hoist Civil Engineering Ltd. | 7·8 |
| 10.M. J. Gleeson Group PLC. | 5·9 |
| 11.May Gumey and Co. Ltd. | 4·6 |
| 12. Roadworks (1952) Ltd. | 3·9 |
| 13.R. M. Douglas Construction Ltd. | 3·26 |
| 14.Dowsett Engineering Construction Ltd. | 3·25 |
| 15.Peter Birse Ltd. | 3·0 |
| 16.Galliford and Sons Ltd. | 2·6 |
| 17.Marples Ridgway Ltd. | 2·2 |
| 18.Costain Civil Engineering Ltd. | 2·1 |
| 19.Eden Construction Ltd. | 1·8 |
| 20.Droitwich Construction Co. Ltd. | 0·9 |
Fairclough Civil Engineering Ltd. and Sir A. McAlpine and Son Ltd. in consortium have been awarded one other contract valued at £19·4 million.
Roads (Greater London)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he has received any representation from the Greater London council concerning the detrunking of all roads within the Greater London council area.
The Greater London council wrote on 6 January notifying the Department of Transport of certain resolutions passed by the appropriate committees of the council concerning the transfer to the council of responsibilities for trunk roads in London.
A40 (Improvement Schemes)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he hopes to be able to start public consultation procedures on the A40 Western circus and Gipsy corner junction improvement schemes in Ealing.
Public consultation will take place between 5 April and 24 May, and there will be a public exhibition of possible schemes between 12 and 16 April.
South Woodford-Barking Relief Road
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to be able to announce his decision on the South Woodford to Barking relief road public inquiry; and when he expects construction of the road to commence.
We have not yet received the inspector's report, and my right hon. Friend will then, in conjunction with the Secretary of State for the Environment, want to consider carefully the details of this very major scheme. I would hope a decision could be reached by the end of the year. Thereafter, if the decision is favourable, there will be some months of detailed planning work before construction can begin.
Port Of London Authority
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he next expects to meet the chairman of the Port of London Authority to discuss the future of the royal dockyards.
I meet the chairman of the Port of London Authority from time to time on matters of common interest, but I have at present no plans for such a meeting.
Vehicle (Testing)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what recent representations he has received about the proposal to dispose of the heavy goods vehicle and public service vehicle testing facilities to Lloyd's register testing authority.
Since the turn of the year I have received two letters—one from the hon. Member dated 22 February and one from my right hon. Friend the member for Gloucester (Mrs. Oppenheim) dated 2 March.
Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs
Disarmament Conference
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement about the visit of the Minister of State to the disarmament conference in Geneva.
During his visit to Geneva from 9 to 11 March my right hon. Friend addressed the committee on disarmament, where he put forward a new British initiative designed to help the negotiations on a convention to ban chemical weapons. He also met the heads of the United States delegations to the INF and START talks, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the president of the International Red Cross.
Diplomatic Service
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to the answer of 9 March, Official Report, c. 435–6, concerning transfers of staff from the home Civil Service to the Diplomatic Service posts, in which grades in the Diplomatic Service he considers it necessary to fill from within the Diplomatic Service on all occasions; and how many posts this represents.
The grades in the Diplomatic Service which it is normally necessary to fill from within the Diplomatic Service on all occasions are the senior grades—heads of mission and Ministers overseas and officers of the under-secretary rank at home—certain counsellor posts—heads of smaller missions overseas and heads of Department at home—and the majority of posts in the training and recruitment grades. These together represent about 450 posts out of the total of 2,432 posts at third secretary level and above.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Hazel Grove on 9 March, Official Report, c. 435–6, if he will break the figures down of transfers of posts from the home Civil Service to the Diplomatic Service to indicate how many such staff were transferred in each year.
The number of secondments which have taken place from the home Civil Service to the Diplomatic Service in each year since May 1979 is as follows:
| Year | Number of Secondments to the Diplomatic Service |
| 1979 (May-December) | 39 |
| 1980 | 38 |
| 1981 | 44 |
| 1982 | 46 |
| 167 |
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will take steps to increase the numbers of exchanges between industry and commerce and commercial and economic posts in the Diplomatic Service.
The number of these exchanges has increased over the past year, during which there have been five new secondments from the Diplomatic Service to industry and commerce and one new secondment from industry to the Diplomatic Service. As stated in the answer which my right hon. Friend gave to my hon. Friend on 9 March—[Vol. 38, c. 436]—we have plans for further secondments in both directions.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will set out the respective responsibilities of a first secretary (economic) and a first secretary (commercial) in the Diplomatic Service.
The task of a first secretary (economic) is the reporting and analysis of economic, financial and trade policy issues, as well as making representations for Her Majesty's Government's views on such matters. A first secretary (commercial) is concerned with the promotion of United Kingdom exports, the provision of advice to business men, and the stimulation of inward investment in the United Kingdom. In practice, the two areas of responsibility frequently overlap. In many posts, first secretaries (commercial) also cover economic reporting; in others, first secretaries (economic) work part-time on trade promotion.
Consultants
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether any of the consultants engaged by his Department since May 1979 were engaged other than by a process of competitive tender; and, if so, whether he will list them.
Consultants are engaged on the basis of competitive tender except where the field of relevant expertise or the time constraints make this impossible. Of the consultants listed in my right hon. Friend's letter of 21 February in reply to the hon. Member's question of 15 February, Howarth and Howarth (UK) Ltd., Mr. J. Cornforth and Professor P. Thody were engaged by the diplomatic wing of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office without tender. Of the contracts let by the Overseas Development Administration, the assignment for computer studies went to P. A. Computer and Telecommunications Limited as a result of competitive tender. The remaining contracts with individuals or groups of individuals, who advised the ODA, were let without competition.Aid-financed technical co-operation consultancies are subject to competitive tender wherever this is feasible and desirable. Whenever a waiver is proposed, there are clear procedures to be followed. About half the contracts of this kind referred to in my right hon. Friend's letter were let without competition.
Foreign Affairs Council
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the outcome of the Foreign Affairs Council of 14 and 15 March.
The Foreign Affairs Council met in Brussels on 14 March. I represented the United Kingdom, and my hon. and learned Friend the Minister for Trade was present for the discussions on trade items.There was a ministerial negotiating conference on 15 March with Portugal. My right hon. Friend the Minister of State represented the United Kingdom at this, and at the subsequent meeting of Ministers to discuss the Genscher-Colombo proposals.I am pleased to report that the Council reached agreement on the two regulations which provided the legal base for paying the refunds amounting to £568 million for 1982. As a result we are on course to receive payment by the end of this month. Ministers also had a full and valuable discussion of the future financing of the Community and the budgetary problems. I stressed the need for rapid progress. The subject will be discussed further at next week's European Council on the basis of a report from the presidency and the Commission.The Commission reported to the Council on the Spanish Government's welcome move in relation to problems which have arisen concerning the implementation of the 1970 EC-Spain agreement and the imbalance of trading opportunities arising under it. This is the subject of a separate answer by my hon. and learned Friend the Minister for Trade.The Council had a further discussion of the question of extending the franchise for the 1984 European elections. No agreement was reached, but Foreign Ministers will consider the question again in the margins of the European Council.New regulations for energy demonstration projects up to 31 December 1983 were agreed by Ministers. There was also agreement on a draft mandate for the Community to participate in the negotiations for a new international sugar agreement and on reconstruction aid to the Lebanon for a water supply project in Damour near Beirut.Ministers took note of the presidency's report on the state of work on Greenland's application to withdraw from the Community and called for a more detailed report in time for discussion at the April Council.
| Married man with two children | |||||
| Average manual earnings | Income tax | NIC* | Net income† | £ per week Real net income* (at 1979–80 prices) | |
| 1979–80 | 101·10 | 19·14 | 6·57 | 83·39 | 83·39 |
| 1980–81 | 117·60 | 22·90 | 7·94 | 95·31 | 81·94 |
| 1981–82 | 128·60 | 26·20 | 9·97 | 102·30 | 78·89 |
| 1982–83‡ | 140·2 | 27·95 | 12·27 | 110·92 | 79·79 |
| * National insurance contributions are at the not contracted-out rate. | |||||
| † After income tax, NIC and child benefit. | |||||
| ‡ Provisional. | |||||
Taxation (Overseas Assets)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will publish in the Official Report such information as he has available showing the increase in the amount of (a) income tax, (b) capital gains tax and (c) capital transfer tax which has accrued since the removal of exchange control as a result of the increase in the
Ministers also discussed proposals for a new trade regime between the Community and Cyprus and for a new financial protocol with Malta. Both subjects were remitted for further consideration by the committee of permanent representatives.
The Commission reported on the state of its negotiations with Spain for a voluntary restraint arrangement covering imports of Spanish steel in 1983. These negotiations are to continue and a further report will be made to the April Council.
At the ministerial negotiating conference with the Portuguese in the margins of the Council, Community declarations on outstanding points on taxation and direct investment were presented to the Portuguese.
Finally, Ministers had a further discussion of the remaining outstanding points on the Genscher-Colombo proposals on which the presidency will make a report to the European Council.
National Finance
Weekly Earnings
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what were the average weekly earnings for an adult male manual worker for 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982; how much tax was payable on each such level of earnings by a married man with two children under 11 years of age; and what was the residual net income and the real purchasing power of the residual net income.
Information is in the following table, which assumes that the taxpayer has no income tax allowances or reliefs other than his personal allowance and that his wife is not working. Child benefit has been included at the average level for the financial year.proportion of income earning and other assets held overseas by persons normally resident or domiciled in the United Kingdom; whether the increase in revenue is consistent with the known outflow of capital from the United Kingdom over this period; and if he will include in the
Official Report details of the number of inquiries which were initiated by the Inland Revenue in each of the past three years under the double taxation agreements referred to in the reply of 2 December 1981 to the hon. Member for Grimsby, Official Report, c. 130.
Income tax payable on income from overseas charged to tax under cases IV and V of schedule D for the two years ended 5 April 1981 was £31 million and £.38.8 million, respectively. In general, the amounts assessed would have been based on the income declared for the two years ended 5 April 1980.
Income tax payable on foreign and public revenue dividends paid by or through United Kingdom paying and collecting agents in the four years ended 5 April 1982 amounted to £84 million, £85·9 million, £108 million and £140·3 million, respectively. The amounts assessed would have been based on the amounts arising in the years in question. These figures include tax paid by corporate, as well as individual, investors and it is not possible to report the amounts which relate to each category. Information is not available on the amount of capital gains tax or capital transfer tax attributable to gains or transfers of overseas assets.
As these figures are incomplete, it is not possible to answer the second part of the hon. Member's question. No precise record of the number of requests for information by the Inland Revenue under our network of double taxation agreements is maintained, but it is estimated that in the three years ended 5 April 1982 they totalled about 375, 450 and 600, respectively.
Tax Evasion
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many prosecutions there have been for tax evasion in each of the last five years.
The number of prosecutions brought (a) by the Board of Inland Revenue and (b) by the Board of Customs and Excise in respect of fraudulent VAT evasion, for each of the last five years, is as follows:
| Year ending | (a) | (b) |
| 31 March 1978 | 158 | 142 |
| 31 March 1979 | 197 | 107 |
| 31 March 1980 | 157 | 109 |
| 31 March 1981 | 208 | 120 |
| 31 March 1982 | 192 | 98 |
Free Ports
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will consider the advantages of Glasgow airport and the container terminal at Greenock when he studies the recommendations of the working party on free ports.
[pursuant to his reply, 14 March 1983, c. 66]: If the Government decided to implement the recommendations of the working party on free ports, careful consideration would be given to all bids for the experimental facilities envisaged in its report.
Seafarers (Taxation)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will consider policies pursued in Sweden and in other countries to reduce the direct cost of employing indigenous seafarers by the introduction of a special seafarers' tax liability; and if he will introduce similar policies in the United Kingdom.
[pursuant to his reply, 14 March 1983, c. 65]: I am aware of the policies pursued in Sweden, but have no plans to introduce a similar measure in the United Kingdom.
Industry
Ferrous Foundries (Closures)
asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many ferrous foundries closed in 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 to the most recent practicable date; and how many redundancies were created as a result of these closures.
The following table lists the ferrous foundries closed in 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982. Information on redundancies created directly by these closure is not available but the overall reduction of employees in ferrous foundries given includes those due to cut-backs by other foundries which have continued in business.
| Number of foundries closed | Number of employees reduced by: | |
| 1979 | 54 | 6,688 |
| 1980 | 47 | 11,523 |
| 1981 | 51 | 7,994 |
| 1982 | 46 | 6,524 |
Loan Guarantee Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Industry how many applications under the small firms loan guarantee scheme have been made to the most recent practicable date; how many have been approved; and how many guarantees have been required.
At the end of February 1983, the Department of Industry had issued 8,861 guarantees in respect of £295 million of bank lending. It is not possible to give a figure for the number of applications or potential applications that are considered and rejected by the banks. Very few applications are rejected by the Department. At the end of February 1983 the Department of Industry had authorised payment on 450 claims under the guarantee arrangements.
asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will make a statement on the outcome of the review of the loan guarantee scheme.
As my right hon. and learned Friend the Chancellor said in yesterday's Budget statement, I have now completed my review of the loan guarantee scheme. During the review I took full account of the available statistics, I held a number of meetings with the participating banks and the main small firms organisations, and I received many comments and representations about the scheme's progress. In addition I was able to draw on two helpful and constructive reports by chartered accountants, Robson Rhodes, following studies commissioned by the Department of Industry and the clearing banks. One report relates to an analysis of some early claims under the scheme, the other is a commentary on a second telephone survey conducted by the Department of Industry. Both reports have provided an important input to my review and both were published today. Copies have been made available in the Library of the House.My review of the scheme has shown that the scheme has, so far, achieved its objectives and continues to operate well. The feedback I have received from the small business community suggests that the scheme has been well received and its catalytic effect on the provision of
other forms of finance has been welcome. I have no doubt that the scheme is proving to be a worthwhile experiment. Following the review I have decided on the following, but I should stress that the main features remain unchanged:
First, as from today, the number of sectors covered by the scheme is to be widened to include vocational training—including business and management training; driving and flying schools; film production, distribution and exhibition; radio and television services, theatre, and so on; sports facilities and sports instruction and other recreational services but excluding betting and gambling.
Secondly, banks and potential borrowers are to be reminded that in carrying out their commercial appraisal the banks will want to take full account of the personal commitment of scheme borrowers to their business. However, personal commitment need not always be measured in terms of financial commitment and the banks will need to consider specific cases on their individual merits. However, the total ban on the taking of personal assets or guarantees as security for scheme loans is to stay.
An important conclusion to be drawn from my review is that both the banks and borrowers have needed time to assess the advantages of the scheme and to learn how to use it to best effect. Awareness and experience have improved since my previous review, but it is still too early to carry out a full appraisal of some important aspects of the scheme's operation and impact. It has therefore been decided that the scheme should continue until closer to the end of the three-year period ending in May 1984, originally envisaged for the pilot phase of the scheme. The Chancellor has therefore agreed to increase the ceiling for guarantees thereby providing support for an additional £300 million of bank lending and bringing the total to £600 million.
An encouraging element to emerge from the review is the attention drawn by the banks, the small firms organisations and others, to the employment benefits derived from the scheme. The investigations of the consultants confirmed the contribution of the scheme to promoting output and new jobs. While accepting that all the estimates so far compiled must be very tentative, they nevertheless demonstrate the considerable job creation potential of the scheme.
Robson Rhodes suggested that the failure rates on early scheme loans are likely to be high—it estimates 1 in 5—but it acknowledged, and I share this view, that it is too early to forecast where such rates may settle and it felt that there are reasons for expecting them to turn down for more recent lending. Clearly the losses on early scheme loans must be put into context in relation to the wider economic benefits of the scheme. The consultants have also confirmed the conclusions of an earlier study that about 80 per cent. of scheme borrowers would either not have found other forms of finance or would have had to give personal guarantees to do so.
Robson Rhodes also identified a need to improve the access of small firms to sources of advice; and to establish a simple but robust appraisal and monitoring procedure for application by the banks. I see merit in both of these recommendations. I have discussed them with the banks and we are now exploring ways in which they can be accommodated.
Energy
Nuclear Accidents
asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he is satisfied with emergency procedure in relation to nuclear accidents.
Yes. Emergency arrangements at nuclear installations have recently been reviewed by the Government with all the organisations concerned. These arrangements are described in a booklet published in 1982 by the Health and Safety Executive entitled "Emergency Plans for Civil Nuclear Installations". A copy of this booklet has been placed in the Library.
Environmental Pollution
asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he has completed his consideration of the sixth report of the Royal Commission on environmental pollution; and if he will make a statement.
I have been asked to reply.The response of the Government of the day to the sixth report was contained in the White Paper "Nuclear Power and the Environment"—Cmnd. 6820—published in May 1977. Our views on the subject are set out fully in the White Paper "Radioactive Waste Management"—Cmnd. 8607—published in July last year.
House Of Commons
House Of Commons Commission
asked the right hon. Member for Middlesbrough, as representing the House of Commons Commission, pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member for Welwyn and Hatfield on 7 March, Official Report, c. 560, in what ways staff of the House who are not members of trade unions may make representations to the Commission.
There is an ultimate right of direct access to the Commission for each individual member of staff of House Departments, whether or not a trade union member, in the event of unresolved and unresolvable conflict with his or her head of Department. Where representations are made collectively by staff in grades not represented by trade unions, the Commission will refer them to the relevant head of Department. Submissions may be made to the Commission by heads of Departments on behalf of any of their staff.
Education And Science
Welsh Language Forms
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list in the Official Report the forms, leaflets and pamphlets published by his Department which are available in either a Welsh language or a bilingual Welsh/English version.
None is produced by the Department, because my responsibility for education in Wales extends only to the university sector. Responsibility for education in the Principality, other than in the university sector, lies with my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales.
Higher Education
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what proportions of the age groups 22, 23 and 24 years are studying for a second or higher degree.
In the academic year 1981–82, 1·1 per cent. of 22-year-olds, 1·0 per cent. of 23-year-olds and 0·8 per cent. of 24-year-olds in Great Britain were on full-time study for postgraduate qualifications.
Library Service (Hersham)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether, in view of the recent cutbacks affecting the Hersham public library and its failure to provide a comprehensive and efficient library service, he will take steps to ensure that the statutory responsibilities of the Surrey county council to provide such a service are properly discharged.
I understand that Surrey county council has been making an experimental change in the public library service in Hersham, and that the experimental period will end on 12 April. I do not consider that this indicates a failure by the council to carry out its statutory duties under the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964.
Medical Students
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether, in view of the fact that they study for a greater proportion of the year than other students, he will raise grants to medical students.
Medical students are one group, among many, who have to attend their courses for longer than that allowed for in the main rates of mandatory award. The Education (Mandatory Awards) Regulations already provide for payment of an extra week's allowance to such students. My right hon. Friend announced on 8 November 1982 that the main rates of grant will be increased by 4 per cent. for the academic year 1983–84; the rates for extra weeks allowance are still being considered.
University Grants
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will make funds available to the University Grants Committee to enable the financial penalties imposed on those universities which exceeded student numbers set by the University Grants Committee to be lifted.
The University Grants Committee's decision involves a redistribution of the funds available for the universities. It does not alter their total.
School Allocations (Appeals)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will now publish the results of the survey carried out into school allocation appeal procedures referred to on 20 December 1982, Official Report, c. 806–807, and place copies in the Library.
The main results of this informal survey were set out in my reply earlier today to my hon. Friend the Member for Brighouse and Spenborough (Mr. Waller). There will be no formal report for publication.
Textile Technology
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what is the current number of students on university undergraduate courses in textile technology; what was the number in 1981–82; and what is the projected figure for 1983–84.
This information is not readily available.
Schools (Admissions And Appeals)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will make a statement on the first year's experience of the school admission and appeal provisions of the Education Act 1980.
Inquiries of local education authorities by the Department indicate that in general the new arrangements for admission to schools, parental appeals and the publication of information about schools introduced under the 1980 Education Act have worked well. The role of parents and their rights in relation to school admissions have been enhanced. Some 9,000 parents dissatisfied with school admission decisions for the autumn of 1982 had recourse to the new local appeal committees where some 3,000, about one in three, were successful. There has also been a significant extension in the quality and range of information made available to parents about schools and about local authority policies and arrangements for education in their areas. In the light of their experience last year local education authorities will, I believe, be in a position further to improve the operation of their arrangements in the interests of parents.
Home Department
Mr Clive Moore
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether, pursuant to the reply to the hon. Member for Newham, North-West of 2 March, Official Report, c. 143, a decision has yet been made on charging Mr. Clive Moore for possessing a firearm without a firearms certificate; whether any disciplinary action has been or is to be taken against him; and whether he will make a statement.
We understand that the Director of Public Prosecutions, to whom the papers were referred by the Commissioner, has advised that the interests of justice do not require the institution of criminal proceedings in this case. The Commissioner informs us that disciplinary proceeding have been instituted against Mr. Moore.
Greenham Common Protesters
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what arrangements have recently been made for reception into prison of women from Greenham Common charged with breach of the peace.
Females given custodial sentences or committed to prison by courts in the south east part of England are normally received into Holloway prison for allocation either to another prison department establishment or to another part of Holloway. The women from Greenham Common who were recently committed to prison for breach of the peace were received into Holloway in this way.
Constituency Electorates
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the standard deviation from the mean for individual constituency electorates at the time of the last Boundary Commission recommendations for
| standard deviation* of electorates | |||
| Recommendations of second periodical reports (1968 electorates) | Electorates of present constituencies (1982) | Recommendations of third periodical reports (1982 electorates) | |
| England | 8,767 | 16,228 | 6,755 |
| Scotland | 13,342 | †15,821 | †7,907 |
| Wales | 11,160 | 14,711 | 7,234 |
| * The standard deviation is a measure of the spread of a set of figures about their mean value. A standard deviation is calculated as the square root of the average of the squared differences between each figure and the mean value. | |||
| † Published in table 4 of the third periodical report of the Boundary Commission for Scotland. Volume 1, Cmnd. 8794. | |||
British Citizens (Police Information)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether there are any circumstances in which information held by the police about British citizens is made available to foreign embassies.
It is not the practice of the police to disclose such information to foreign embassies.
Prisons (Staff)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list for each prison in England and Wales the approved prison officer staffing and the vacancies for such staff that exist in each prison.
The information requested, relating to all forms of prison department establishment in England and Wales as at 28 February 1983, is as follows:
| Establishment | Authorised staffing levels: prison officers | Vacancies |
| Acklington | 154 | 4 |
| Albany | 306 | 41 |
| Aldington | 45 | 7 |
| Ashford | 238 | 34 |
| Ashwell | 72 | 11 |
| Askham Grange | 45 | 4 |
| Aylesbury | 131 | 14 |
| Bedford | 206 | 41 |
| Birmingham | 389 | 20 |
| Blantyre House | 47 | 5 |
| Blundeston | 155 | 26 |
| Bristol | 263 | 8 |
| Brixton | 670 | 79 |
| Brockhill | 108 | 28 |
| Buckley Hall | 48½ | 1½ |
| Bullwood Hall | 91 | 16 |
| Camp Hill | 206 | -3 |
| Campsfield House | 41 | 4 |
| Canterbury | 164 | 0 |
| Cardiff | 219½ | 16½ |
| Channings Wood | 127 | 6 |
| Chelmsford | 183 | 15 |
| Coldingley | 180 | 39 |
| Cookham Wood | 63 | 10 |
| Dartmoor | 237 | 22 |
constituencies in England, Wales and Scotland, respectively; what are the comparable figures for present constituency electorates; and what are the comparable figures under the current Boundary Commission proposals.
The information requested is given in the following table. The figures for Scotland have been supplied by my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Scotland.
| Establishment | Authorised staffing levels: prison officers | Vacancies |
| Deerbolt | 132½ | 27½ |
| Dorchester | 95 | 6 |
| Dover | 114½ | 9½ |
| Drake Hall | 68 | 1 |
| Durham | 384 | -5 |
| East Sutton Park | 26½ | ½ |
| Eastwood Park | 53½ | 7½ |
| Erlestoke House | 96½ | 12½ |
| Everthorpe | 110 | 11 |
| Exeter | 234 | 13 |
| Featherstone | 159 | 29 |
| Feltham | 173½ | 21½ |
| Ford | 97 | 8 |
| Foston Hall | 40½ | 5½ |
| Frankland | 335 | 58 |
| Gartree | 269 | 54 |
| Gaynes Hall | 62 | 27 |
| Glen Parva | 279½ | 39½ |
| Gloucester | 143 | 4 |
| Grendon (including Spring Hill) | 176 | 30 |
| Guys Marsh | 69½ | 11½ |
| Haslar | 48 | 2 |
| Hatfield | 92 | 9 |
| Haverigg | 125 | 23 |
| Hewell Grange | 55 | 3 |
| Highpoint | 82 | 6 |
| Hindley | 118 | 19 |
| Hollesley Bay | 245 | 50 |
| Holloway | 330 | 28 |
| Hull | 291 | 31 |
| Huntercombe | 68½ | 5½ |
| Kingston (Portsmouth) | 68 | 4 |
| Kirkham | 81 | 4 |
| Kirklevington | 51 | 5 |
| Lancaster | 93 | 2 |
| Latchmere House | 86 | 9 |
| Leeds | 380 | 36 |
| Leicester | 245 | 20 |
| Lewes | 216 | 15 |
| Leyhill | 60 | 5 |
| Lincoln | 251 | 28 |
| Liverpool | 458 | 68 |
| Long Lartin | 356 | 46 |
| Lowdham Grange | 89½ | -6½ |
| Low Newton | 127 | 18 |
Establishment
| Authorised staffing levels: prison officers
| Vacancies
|
| Maidstone | 207 | 3 |
| Manchester | 493 | 54 |
| Medomsley | 46 | 7 |
| New Hall | 44 | 2 |
| Northallerton | 87 | 14 |
| Northeye | 100 | 11 |
| North Sea Camp | 69 | 9 |
| Norwich | 254 | 13 |
| Nottingham | 125 | -14 |
| Onley | 165 | 23 |
| Oxford | 115½ | 13½ |
| Parkhurst | 365 | 69 |
| Pentonville | 437 | 109 |
| Portland | 180 | 22 |
| Preston | 149 | 5 |
| Pucklechurch | 118 | 8 |
| Ranby | 132 | 18 |
| Reading | 162 | 23 |
| Risley | 474 | 32 |
| Rochester | 144 | 0 |
| Rudgate | 65 | 10 |
| Send | 49½ | 6½ |
| Shepton Mallet | 84½ | 5½ |
| Shrewsbury | 115½ | 4½ |
| Stafford | 219 | 16 |
| Standford Hill | 128 | 23 |
| Stoke Heath | 148½ | 25½ |
| Styal | 147 | 8 |
| Sudbury | 71 | 2 |
| Swansea | 143½ | 4½ |
| Swinfen Hall | 113 | 28 |
| Thorp Arch | 111 | 13 |
| Usk | 81 | 8 |
| The Verne | 135 | 10 |
| Wakefleld | 464 | 59 |
| Wandsworth | 392 | 48 |
| Wellingborough | 123 | 7 |
| Werrington | 46 | 9 |
| Wetherby | 79 | 6 |
| Whatton | 85 | 6 |
| Winchester | 306 | 16 |
| Wormwood Scrubs | 536 | 100 |
| Wymott | 227 | 27 |
Note:
(1) One hundred and forty-six of the posts listed above as vacant are officer instructor posts presently occupied by civilian instructors.
(2) The figures given may be misleading where (a) very recent increases in complement have been made and the additional staff concerned have yet to be posted in; (b) the complement levels are artifically high because part of the establishment is not currently in use or, in the case of new accommodation, has not yet been taken into service; or (c) where the staff in post figures used to derive the numbers of vacancies include newly joined staff spending an initial period at an establishment for familiarisation before undergoing training.
Police Sergeant O'leary
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department, on the basis of Sergeant O'Leary's first suspension on 11 January 1979 until June 1981 and again on 21 July 1981 until the present date, on full pay and allowances, what have been the total drawings of money and allowances by this Metropolitan police sergeant; and whether he will make a statement.
My noble Friend will write to the hon. Member.
Minimum Sentences
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will give, for the longest available period of time, the number of cases where a judge has recommended a minimum sentence, and, of these, the number where the minimum recommended sentence was in fact served.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to his question on 24 February.—[Vol. 37, c. 489–90.] Of such prisoners so far released, two have been detained for at least the minimum period recommended by the trial judge.
Commonwealth Citizens
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many Commonwealth citizens were admitted to and debarred from entry to the United Kingdom in the most recent year for which figures are available; and in the latter case, what was the reason for the refusal of permission to enter.
Figures for Commonwealth citizens of admissions by category and of total refusals of leave to enter at ports are published annually in "Control of Immigration: Statistics"—table 1(a) of the issue for 1981, Cmnd. 8533. The following table gives an analysis of the reasons for refusal.
| Commonwealth citizens admitted and refused leave to enter at ports 1981 | |
| Number of journeys | |
| Total admissions | 1,500,000 |
| Total refusals | 5,788 |
| of which | |
| Insufficient means for visit or not genuine visitor | 3,585 |
| Transit passenger thought to be unable or not intending to proceed at once to another country and assured of entry there | 1,153 |
| Intention to study not genuine or unsatisfactory arrangements for study | 156 |
| Seeking employment without a work permit | 48 |
| Other reasons | 846 |
Squatters
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will introduce legislation to enable the owners of property to call upon the police to have squatters evicted.
My right hon. Friend has no present plans to do so. It is already a criminal offence for a person who has entered premises as a trespasser to fail to leave when required to do so by a displaced residential occupier or protected intending occupier, and the police have power to arrest such a person. Otherwise trespass is largely a matter for the civil law, but the police may assist owners to eject trespassers. My right hon. Friend is currently undertaking a review of the law relating to trespass on residential premises, in connection with which he issued a consultant paper on 2 February.
Trafalgar Square (Crowd Safety)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he has reached any conclusion about the suitability of Trafalgar Square under present conditions for the accommodation in safety of very large crowds following his receipt of the coroner's verdict on deaths in the square in connection with last new year's eve celebrations; and if he will make a statement.
I have asked the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis for a report when he has completed an examination of the events in Trafalgar Square, and of the police operation, during the celebrations. The purpose of the examination, which is taking account of the inquest findings, is to assist in the identification and adoption of any necessary lessons for the future. I shall report to the House when I have received and considered the Commissioner's report.
Parliamentary Elections (Spending Limits)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will issue a circular drawing to the attention of returning officers for the new parliamentary constituencies the spending limits for parliamentary elections for each candidate and the rules governing the spending of money in any pre-election campaign period.
Home Office officials informed all returning officers of the current maximum permitted election expenses on 16 March 1982. It is, however, not the acting returning officer's function to advise candidates or their agents on the conduct of an election campaign.
Coroners' Courts
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will introduce legislation to require coroners to publish the costs of provisions of defence solicitors and banisters where these are paid for from public funds;and if he will make a statement.
No. I know of no authority at present enabling the costs of legal representation in proceedings before a coroner's court to be paid for from public funds.
Scotland
Health Boards (Allocations)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish the allocations to health boards under the Scottish health authorities revenue equalisation system for each of the last four years.
Total allocations to health boards to meet their revenue and capital expenditure commitments in the years requested are as follows:
| £'000 | ||||
| Health Boards | 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 |
| Argyll and Clyde | 54,936 | 69,759 | 79,487 | 85,475 |
| Ayreshire and Arran | 31,898 | 44,576 | 51,453 | 56,743 |
| Borders | 10,416 | 13,606 | 15,466 | 16,925 |
| Dumfries and Galloway | 19,364 | 25,629 | 28,035 | 30,416 |
| Fife | 34,564 | 44,471 | 51,135 | 55,452 |
| Forth Valley | 32,224 | 45,600 | 50,478 | 53,990 |
| Grampian | 64,633 | 85,296 | 94,855 | 103,618 |
| Greater Glasgow | 209,017 | 267,770 | 297,561 | 315,778 |
| Highland | 28,813 | 36,772 | 40,461 | 42,590 |
| Lanarkshire | 60,002 | 79,633 | 88,087 | 95,332 |
| Lothian | 122,026 | 158,862 | 176,912 | 190,604 |
| Orkney | 1,851 | 2,414 | 2,857 | 3,083 |
| Shetland | 2,761 | 3,074 | 3,518 | 3,869 |
| Tayside | 75,681 | 99,134 | 108,124 | 113,816 |
| Western Isles | 3,341 | 4,573 | 5,218 | 5,745 |
| Total | 753,547 | 981,169 | 1,093,647 | 1,173,436 |
Note:
These figures comprise allocations determined by the Scottish Health Authorities Revenue Equalisation formula and also amounts allocated to boards for the maintenance of national specialty services, for support finance projects and for other minor expenditure commitments.
Expenditure by boards on major building projects is provided for separately by the Scottish Home and Health Department.
Dental Treatment
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many courses of dental treatment were carried out under the National Health Service in Scotland on 16 to 20-year-olds during the years 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982.
The available information is set out in the following table. Details are not yet available for 1982, and the figures for 1981 reflect the lowering of the upper age for free dental treatment from 21 to 18 which took effect on 1 April 1981.
| Numbers | |
| 1979 | 338,680 |
| 1980 | 349,467 |
| 1981 | *92,225 |
| 1981 | †153,700 |
| * 16 to 20-year-olds to 31 March 1981. | |
| † 16 to 18-year-olds from 1 April 1981. | |
Suicides
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many suicides and attempted suicides there were in Scotland for the years 1975 to 1982, inclusive; and if he will break down the figures by region.
Figures for 1975 to 1981 are published in the annual reports of the Registrar General for Scotland—table C2.16—copies of which are in the Library. Final figures for 1982 are not yet available. Statistics on the number of attempted suicides in Scotland are not available centrally.
Women's Aid
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list in the Official Report the total amount allocated in each of the years 1979–80, 1980–81 and 1981–82 by his Department to Women's Aid.
The information is as follows:
| Year | £ |
| 1979–81* | 27,990 |
| 1981–82 | 23,000 |
| * 18-month period to take account of change in Scottish Women's Aid financial year. | |
Health Boards
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what financial allocations he has made to health boards for 1983–84.
I have allocated to health boards £1,221 million—£1,217 million net—for revenue expenditure and £32 million for locally managed capital expenditure on the hospitals and community health services programme in 1983–84. After taking account of boards' income on revenue account, the net cash limited allocations to individual health boards are as follows:
| Health Board | Revenue | Ordinary Capital | Total |
| Expenditure | Programme | ||
| £ million (net) | £ million | £ million | |
| Argyll and Clyde | 88·440 | 2·595 | 91·035 |
| Ayrshire and Arran | 59·679 | 2·128 | 61·807 |
| Borders | 17·555 | 0·586 | 18·141 |
| Dumfries and Galloway | 31·175 | 0·848 | 32·023 |
| Fife | 57·596 | 1·933 | 59·529 |
| Forth Valley | 56·550 | 1·568 | 58·118 |
| Grampian | 105·661 | 2·909 | 108·570 |
| Greater Glasgow | 327·130 | 6·873 | 334·003 |
| Highland | 44·937 | 1·181 | 46·118 |
| Lanarkshire | 98·427 | 3·213 | 101·640 |
| Lothian | 195·369 | 4·992 | 200·361 |
| Orkney | 3·185 | 0·112 | 3·297 |
| Shetland | 3·968 | 0·141 | 4·109 |
| Tayside | 115·777 | 2·736 | 118·513 |
| Western Isles | 5·955 | 0·185 | 6·140 |
| Total | *1,211·404 | 32·000 | 1,243·404 |
| * Not yet allocated £6 million. | |||
Attorney-General
Retired Judges (Legal Advice)
asked the Attorney-General if he will give the reasons why he will not seek to make it a condition of the receipt by retired members of the judiciary of publicly funded pensions that they should not give formal legal advice or take professional part in legal proceedings.
There is no need whatever for such action.
Welsh Language Forms
asked the Attorney-General if, in view of the fact that courts in Wales do not send out bilingual or Welsh language documentation and correspondence to persons requesting notification of court action through the medium of the Welsh language, he will take steps to ensure that all standard documents sent out by the courts in Wales are printed in a bilingual format.
At commencement of proceedings issued in the county courts and in the Crown court in Wales, litigants are notified, by means of a bilingual notice, that a Welsh language version of the documents will be provided on request. The Lord Chancellor would be glad to receive from the hon. Member particulars of any cases in which it is claimed that this has not been done. Since High court documents are served by the parties themselves, no such bilingual notice is attached to High court documents issued in Wales, but if any party seeks a Welsh translation, the court will arrange for this to be provided.
asked the Attorney-General if he will list in the Official Report those forms, leaflets and pamphlets published by his Department which are available in a Welsh language or a bilingual Welsh/English format.
My Department does not publish forms, leaflets or pamphlets.
Judge Robert Charles Chope
asked the Attorney-General if, in view of the fact that his Honour Judge Robert Charles Chope pleaded guilty and was sentenced on 3 March for two offences, the Lord Chancellor will dismiss him from the bench.
Judge Chope was convicted at Penrhyn magistrates court on 2 March 1983 of driving without reasonable consideration to other road users and not having a test certificate. He was fined £60 and his licence endorsed with two penalty points. The suggestion contained in the question is quite unacceptable to the Lord Chancellor.
Conspiracy And Protection Of Property Act 1875
asked the Attorney-General how many times the Conspiracy and Protection of Property Act 1875 has been used to prosecute individual trade unionists in the past five years.
The Director of Public Prosecutions has not instituted any proceedings under the Conspiracy and Protection of Property Act 1875 during the past five years. I have no information concerning such proceedings by other prosecuting authorities.
Wales
Medical Practitioner Committee
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will take steps to set up a Wales (Welsh) medical practitioner committee, in view of the fact that doctors from the Principality have only a single representative on the London-based medical practitioner committee.
The medical practices committee covers the whole of England and Wales and has only two members from the London area. With one member out of eight on the committee, my right hon. Friend and I do not consider that doctors from Wales are under-represented. Nevertheless, we will shortly be consulting interested bodies in Wales on the desirability or otherwise of establishing a-separate committee for Wales.
Roads
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will list for the years-1980, 1981 and 1982 the number of kilometres of (a) trunk motorways, (b) other trunk roads, (c) local authority motorways, (d) other principal roads and (e) other roads in Wales.
The figures are as follows:
| 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | |
| Trunk motorways | 94 | 107 | 120 |
| Other trunk roads | 1,627 | 1,641 | 1,645 |
| Local authority motorways | — | — | — |
| Other principal roads | 2,454 | 2,457 | 2,445 |
| Other roads | 27,164 | 27,665 | 27,829 |
Teachers (Unemployment)
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is the present number of qualified teachers registered as unemployed in Wales in aggregate and in the various categories such as secondary, primary, pre-primary and special education teachers and the numbers unemployed in aggregate and in the same categories in March 1975 and March 1979, respectively.
The latest available information relates to September 1982 and is as follows:
| Numbers of Qualified Teachers Registered as Unemployed | |||
| Sept. 1982 | March 1979 | March 1975 | |
| Secondary | 1,108 | 466 | 54 |
| Primary | 1,164 | 419 | 54 |
| Pre-Primary | 15 | 3 | 9 |
| Special education teachers | 37 | 18 | 4 |
| Total | 2,324 | 906 | 121 |
Environment
Wild Plants
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what publicity is being provided on the protection of wild plants protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act.
New measures for the protection of wild plants were brought into force on 28 September 1982 and were announced in a press notice and set out more fully in a circular to local authorities. About 100,000 copies of a booklet "Wildlife the Law and You", published by the Nature Conservancy Council, have been distributed widely, including a copy to every primary and secondary school and to every university and college library. Under the auspices of the NCC, the voluntary conservation movement has also produced a number of leaflets and wall charts.
Sheltered Housing
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has given consideration to the recruitment, training and qualifications of sheltered housing wardens, with a view to making recommendations to local authorities on the matter.
The recruitment, training and qualifications of sheltered housing wardens employed by local authorities are matters for the individual authorities concerned. No central Government recommendations in this area are planned.However, I understand that recommendations to local authorities on the training of sheltered housing wardens were made in a report sent to all authorities by the local government training board in 1980.
Prime Minister
Genetic Manipulation Advisory Group
asked the Prime Minister if, when considering proposals that the genetic manipulation advisory group join the Health and Safety Executive, Her Majesty's Government will seek to ensure that its effectiveness is not diminished.
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Education and Science, in partnership with the Health and Safety Commission, will shortly be starting consultations on the future of the genetic manipulation advisory group. We are determined that any new arrangements for advising on genetic manipulation shall meet current and foreseeable needs and be effective in operation.
Employment
Housing Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how the change to the new housing benefit from 1 April will affect the calculation of the housing component of the retail price index.
The method of calculation of the retail prices index follows the recommendations of the retail prices index advisory committee. Apart from some changes in the methods of data collection, the calculation will not be affected by the change to the new housing benefit as it comes into effect.
Weekly Earnings
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list the value of the lowest decile of all earnings expressed as a percentage of average earnings, both male and female earnings combined, for each of the last 10 years.
The available information in respect of full-tithe male employees aged 21 and over and full-time female employees aged 18 and over is as follows:
| April | Lowest decile*of gross weekly earnings as a percentage of average gross weekly earnings |
| 1973 | 49 |
| 1974 | 51 |
| 1975 | 54 |
| 1976 | 55 |
| 1977 | 56 |
| 1978 | 55 |
| 1979 | 55 |
| 1980 | 54 |
| 1981 | 54 |
| 1982 | 53 |
| Source: New Earnings Survey. | |
| * The figure below which the 10 per cent. of employees with the lowest gross weekly earnings lie. | |
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is his latest estimate of the average industrial weekly earnings for (a) a male manual worker over 21 years old, (b) a female manual worker over 21 years old, (c) a male non-manual worker aged over 21 years and (d) a female non-manual worker aged over 21 years.
The latest estimates, which relate to April 1982, are those published in tables 10 and 11 of part A of the report on the new earnings survey 1982, a copy of which is in the Library.
Miss K Hardcastle
asked the Secretary of State for Employment, pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Keighley, Official Report, 7 March, c. 325, if he will ensure that the Manpower Services Commission considers offering support to Miss K. Hardcastle, the details of whose course in radio journalism have been supplied to him.
It is for the Manpower Services Commission to determine which specific courses to support. In assessing priorities for support with public money, it takes into account the benefits likely to be gained both by the economy and by individual trainees.
Employment Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) how many persons were employed in the machine tool manufacturing industry in 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982; and if he will give the most recent available figure for 1983;(2) how many persons were employed in woollen textiles for 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982; and what is the most recent available figure for 1983.
The latest available figures are for December 1982 and the following table gives the information for Great Britain at December each year from 1977.
| Employees in employment | ||
| December each year | Manufacture of metal-working machine tools (*MLH 332) | Woollen and worsted industry (*MLH 414) |
| 1977 | 65,100 | 80,100 |
| 1978 | 65,100 | 75,400 |
| 1979 | 65,300 | 68,700 |
| 1980 | 59,500 | 55,800 |
| 1981† | 51,600 | 51,300 |
| 1982† | 46,100 | 46,400 |
| * Minimum list heading of the 1968 standard industrial classification. | ||
| † Provisional. | ||
| United Kingdom | |||||||
| Antenatal leave | Postnatal leave | Qualifying conditions for cash benefits | Cash benefits to employees | Duration of cash benefit | Qualifying conditions for reinstatement | Reinstatement period | Alternative re-engagement conditions |
| 11 weeks 734 | 29 weeks | Maternity Pay | Maternity Pay | Maternity Pay | As for right to maternity pay and must inform employer in writing, 21 days before absence begins that she intends to return. She must also advise employer, in writing at least 21 days before date of intended return. | At any time before the end of the period of 29 weeks of beginning with the week in which the date of confinement fails. | Reinstatement period may be extended by four weeks by employer or (if sick) by employee. |
| The employee must continue to be employed by her employer, whether or not she is at work, until immediately before the beginning of the eleventh week before the expected week of confinement, as certified by a midwife or doctor in a Certificate of Expected Confinement. She does not need to leave at that time but may continue her employment even up to the date of confinement providing that she can do her job adequately and is not contravening health and safety requirements. | 90% of weekly wage less flat rate maternity allowance £25 per week. | First six weeks of absence. | |||||
Special Employment Measures
asked the Secretatry of State for Employment if he will publish a table showing, in constant money terms, the expenditure incurred by his Department on special employment measures for each year from 1977–78 to 1982–83, estimated, inclusive.
[pursuant to his reply, 15 March 1983, c. 124]: The following table shows the expenditure on the special employment measures adjusted by applying the gross domestic product deflator at market prices, with 1981–82 as the base year:
| £ million | |
| 1977–78 | 528 |
| 1978–79 | 511 |
| 1979–80 | 516 |
| 1980–81 | 880 |
| 1981–82 | 912 |
Employment
Maternity Leave And Pay
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list such information as he has for each European country on (a) total maternity leave, (b) the duration of leave which is paid and (c) pay or allowances as a percentage of weekly earnings.
The following table, drawn from the most recent information available, shows the provisions relating to maternity leave, including the right to return to work and maternity pay, in the European Community countries. Information on other European countries is not readily available.It is however hazardous to make simple comparisons between levels of benefit in different countries because account must be taken of differences in wage levels, standards of living, taxation treatment and other social conditions, such as benefits available in the social security systems as a whole. The comparative table should therefore be treated with caution.The rates of exchange used in the table are those reported in London in December 1981, when the most recent information available was gathered.
Antenatal leave
| Postnatal leave
| Qualifying conditions for cash benefits
| Cash benefits to employees
| Duration of cash benefit
| Qualifying conditions for reinstatement
| Reinstatement period
| Alternative re-engagement conditions
|
| She must have been continuously employed by her employer for at least two years immediately before the beginning of the eleventh week before the expected week of confinement if she works 16 hours or more a week, or for at least five years if she works less than 16 hours a week but not less than eight hours. | Maternity grant £25 | Maternity grant Lump sum payment | The employer may also request in writing, not less than 49 days after the notified expected week or notified expected week or notified date of confinement, confirmation that employee still intends to return. Employee must reply within 14 days, failure to do so within that time or as soon as reasonably practicalbe will lose her right to return. | ||||
| At least 21 days before she stops work, she must tell her employer (in writing if requested) that she intends to stop work because of her condition. If it is not reasonably practicable to give three weeks' notice she may inform her employer of her intention less than three weeks before she stops work, or as soon as practicable after she stops work. | |||||||
| Women who are entitled to maternity allowance automatically qualify for maternity grant. | |||||||
Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| |||||
| a. At least 26 paid contributions if insured before 6 April 1975 or | £25·00 a week. Plus 1 Adult dependent — £15·45 a week. Each child—£0·30 a week. | At least 18 weeks (from 11 weeks before expected week of confinement). | |||||
| b. Contributions must have been paid or credited in the appropriate tax year, amounting to at least 50 times minimum weekly contribution for that year. | If the confinement is later than expected, the allowance may be paid for up to 6 weeks after the week of confinement. | ||||||
| A married woman residing with her husband cannot be paid any increase of maternity allowance, either for her husband or for a child, unless her husband is incapable of self-support. | |||||||
| Child benefit payable in addition. |
Belgium
| |||||||
Antenatal leave
| Postnatal leave
| Qualifying conditions for cash benefits
| Cash benefits to employees
| Duration of cash benefit
| Qualifying conditions for reinstatement
| Reinstatement period
| Alternative re-engagement conditions
|
| 6 weeks | 8 weeks | Maternity grant Insured with family allowance fund. | Maternity grant 1st child-22,345 BFr (£307·25) | Maternity grant Lump sum payment | Woman must advise employer as soon as she is aware that she is pregnant, not necessarily in writing She must produce a medical certificate showing 'expected week of confinement'. For period of absence, contract suspended and absence treated as sickness. | 8 weeks after confinement. | |
| 2ndchild-15,412BFr (£211·92) | |||||||
| Each subsequent child 8,290 BFr (£113·99) | |||||||
Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| |||||
| 6 months' contributions. | 79·5% of earnings | Manual worker— | |||||
| 1 week full pay from employer, then maternity allowance for 13 weeks. | |||||||
Non-manual worker— | |||||||
| 1 month full pay from employer, then maternity allowance for ten weeks. | |||||||
| Payable for up to 14 weeks (including 8 obligatory weeks after birth). | |||||||
Denmark
| |||||||
Antenatal leave
| Postnatal leave
| Qualifying conditions for cash benefits
| Cash benefits to employees
| Duration of cash benefit
| Qualifying conditions for reinstatement
| Reinstatement period
| Alternative re-engagement conditions
|
| 4 weeks | 14 weeks | Maternity allowance All employed women. Yearly income which would have entitled claimant to at least 10% of daily allowance or earnings at this rate in 6 of the Last 12 months and in the last 4 weeks before absence. | Maternity allowance 90% of average weekly earnings. | Maternity allowance 4 weeks before confinement and 14 weeks after. | Provided due notice of intention to return given, entitled to return to previous job. | The period for which a woman's job may be considered to be protected after confinement remains to be tested in the courts. | |
Maximum benefit 1,850 KR (£130·23) a week. | |||||||
| Women who carry out domestic work in their own homes for at least one other person; insured for 10 months. | According to rate of contribution. | 4 weeks after birth. | |||||
Maximum benefit 910 KR (£65·12) a week. | |||||||
Federal Republic of Germany
| |||||||
Antenatal leave
| Post-natal leave
| Qualifying conditions for cash benefits
| Cash benefits to employees
| Duration of cash benefit
| Qualifying conditions for reinstatement
| Reinstatement period
| Alternative re-engagement conditions
|
| 6 weeks | 8 weeks | Maternity grant Insured women. Members of insured persons families, who earn less than 410 DM (£95·35) a month. | Maternity grant 100 DM (£23–26) | 4 weeks before the end of the maternity leave the mother is expected to inform the employer of her intentions to continue working. She may then give notice to the end of that period. For two months thereafter protection against dismissal is valid. If a woman wishes extension of maternity leave of up to six months after confinement, she must apply in writing giving two weeks notice. | 8 weeks after confinement or at the latest when child has become six months old. | ||
| 12 weeks in the case of multiple and pre mature births. | |||||||
| Additional leave may be requested by mother up to the day when child is six months old. | Maternity allowance 1. Employed women who were insured for 12 weeks between 10th and 4th month before confinement. | Maternity allowance 1. 100% of average of last 3 months wages Maximum-25 DM (£5·81) a day Minimum-3·5 DM (£0·81) a day. If still employed, employer pays supplement equal to difference between benefit and net wages. | Maternity allowance 6 weeks before expected date of confinement, then for the duration of maternity leave, i.e. up to the date on which the child is 6 months old. | ||||
| 2. Insured women who are not employed but who are entitled to sickness benefit. | 2. Maternity allowance payable equal to sickness benefit. | ||||||
| 3. Insured women not entitled to sickness benefit. | 3. Lump-sum of 150 DM ££34·88) | ||||||
| 4. Insured person's dependants who earn less than 410 DM (£95·35) a month. | 4. Lump-sum of between 35 DM (£8·14) and 150 DM (£34·88). | ||||||
France
| |||||||
Ante-natal leave
| Post-natal leave
| Qualifying conditions for cash benefits
| Cash benefits to employees
| Duration of cash benefit
| Qualifying conditions for reinstatement
| Reinstatement period
| Alternative re-engagement conditions
|
| 6 weeks | 10 weeks | Pre-natal allowance ALL WOMEN | Pre-natal allowance 3 instalments of 548·24 Fr (£50·41) 1,096·48 Fr (£100·83) and 822·36 Fr (£75·62) respectively, after each medical examination. | Employee must produce "Expected week of confinement" certificate and send it by registered post before commencing maternity leave. | 10 weeks after confinement | If woman wishes to extend leave, she loses any right to reinstatement but retains a right to priority of re-engagement during year following end of maternity leave. | |
| May be extended to 8 weeks if there are pathological problems connected with pregnancy | May be extended to 14 weeks if there are pathological problems connected with the pregnancy | Pregnancy must be declared by end of the 15th week, and 3 medical examinations must be carried out (before the end of the 15th week of pregnancy, during the 6th month and the first pan of the 8th month). | No automatic right to old job. Replacement cannot be dismissed. Employee must advise employer by registered post, at least two weeks before intended return. Employer under obligation to offer first vacancy. | If the child remains in hospital up to end of the sixth week following the birth, the woman may put back to the date of the end of hospitalisation the whole or part of the holiday to which she is already entitled. | |||
| May be extended by 2 weeks in the case of multiple births. | Post-natal allowance ALL WOMEN 3 medical examinations of the child afterbirth. | Post-natal allowance 2,292·64 Fr (£210·82) 473·48 Fr (£43·54) and473·48Fr(£43·54) respectively, after each medical examination plus in the case of multiple births, 2,467·08 Fr (£226·86) for the second infant and 5,694·22 Fr (£523·61) for the 3rd and any others. | |||||
Ante-natal leave
| Post-natal leave
| Qualifying conditions for cash benefits
| Cask benefits to employees
| Duration of cash benefit
| Qualifying conditions for reinstatement
| Reinstatement period
| Alternative re-engagement conditions
|
| In connection with the birth of a third child, women have a new right to 26 weeks' leave, eight of which are to be taken before the birth and the remainder afterwards. | Maternity allowance INSURED WOMEN 200 hours of employment in the 3 months or the calendar quarter before the beginning of the 9th month preceding the expected date of confinement or the beginning of the maternity allowance period. 10 months of insurance or equivalent before the expected date of confinement. | Maternity allowance 90% insurable earnings | Maternity allowance 16 weeks including 10 weeks before confinement. (2 weeks more in cases of multiple births.) | ||||
Greece
| |||||||
Antenatal leave
| Postnatal leave
| Qualifying conditions for cash benefits
| Cash benefits to employees
| Duration of cash
| Qualifying conditions for benefit reinstatement
| Reinstatement period
| Alternative re-engagement conditions
|
Maternity grant All insured women; some urban self-employed women; dependants of insured persons. | Maternity grant 18,750 Dr (£173·28). | Maternity grant Lump sum benefit. | |||||
| Special schemes for those employed in agriculture, the public service and parts of the private sector. | |||||||
| a. 50 days of contribution in last calendar year or in tbe 12 months before the last three months. | |||||||
| b. Payable also in cases of miscarriages or medically approved abortion after 6 months pregnancy. | |||||||
Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| |||||
| All insured women; some urban self-employed women. | 50% of earnings according to wage class plus 10% of benefit for each dependant up to a maximum of 4. | Up to 42 days before and 42 days after confinement. | |||||
| Special schemes for those employed in agriculture, the public service and parts of the private sector. | |||||||
| 200 days of contributions in last 2 years. | |||||||
Minimum benefit 252 Dr (£2·33) a day. | |||||||
Maximum benefit 1,260 Dr (£11·64) a day. | |||||||
Maternity allowance supplement Insured women. | Maternity allowance supplement
| Maternity allowance supplement
| |||||
| In receipt of maternity allowance and grant from IKA and under a contract of employment before the period of absence for pregnancy and confinement. | The difference between maternity allowance and earnings. | Up to 42 days before and 42 days after confinement. | |||||
Ireland
| |||||||
Antenatal leave
| Postnatal leave
| Qualifying conditions for cash benefits
| Cash benefits to employees
| Duration of cash benefit
| Qualifying conditions for reinstatement
| Reinstatement period
| Alternative re-engagement conditions
|
| At least 4 weeks before expected week of confinement | At least 4 weeks after expected week of confinement | Maternity grant
| Maternity grant
| Maternity grant
| Employee must inform employer, in writing, not later than 4 weeks before the date on which she expects to return to work, of her intention to return to work and of the date on which she expects to return to work. | At any time before the end of the 14 week maternity leave period provided that at least 4 weeks the expected week of confinement. | Reinstatement period may be extended by a maximum period of 4 weeks by employee. |
| Insured women. | IR £8·00 (£6·62) IR £300·00 (£248·24) for triplets and IR £400·00 (£333·99) for quadruplets; for which no insurance conditions are required. | ||||||
| Wives of insured persons. | |||||||
| The grant is paid on either the mother's own insurance, or ther husband's. If both are insured two grants may be payable. | |||||||
| Total maternity leave of 14 consecutive weeks—employee can choose how to apportion provided that the above minima are adhered to. | Contributions paid in at least 26 weeks insurable employment before the date of confinement. | This notification must be confirmed in writing not earlier than 4 weeks and not later than 2 weeks before the date on which the employee expects to return to work. | |||||
Antenatal leave
| Postnatal leave
| Qualifying conditions for cash benefits
| Cash benefits to employees
| Duration of cash benefit
| Qualifying conditions for reinstatement
| Reinstatement period
| Alternative re-engagement conditions
|
| Employee may opt to take further leave of up to 4 more consecutive weeks running on from end of basic leave period. Notice must be given to employer at time of notification of basic leave or not later than 4 weeks before employee would be expected to return to work if additional leave were not taken. | Contributions paid or credited in at least 26 weeks of the last complete contribution year before the beginning of the benefit year in which the confinement takes place or is any subsequent complete contribution year before the date of confinement. | ||||||
Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| |||||
| Insured women. | IR £23·30 (£20·94) a week. | From 6 weeks before the expected date of confinement until 6 weeks after. May be extended if confinement occurs later than expected. | |||||
| Contributions paid in at least 26 weeks of the last complete contribution year before the beginning of the benefit year in which the confinement takes place or in any subsequent complete contribution year before the date of confinement. | |||||||
Pay-related supplement Insured women. | Pay-related supplement
| Pay-related supplement
| |||||
| Claimant must have title to flat-rate maternity allowance and earnings of more than IR £20.000 (£16·55) a week. | First 147 days—40% of insurable earnings between IR £20·00 (£16·55) and IR £170·00 (£140·67) a week. Next 78 days — 25% of above earnings. Final 78 days—20% of above earnings. | Payable for 6 days a week for up to 381 days in a period of interruption of employment, starting from 13th day. For this purpose when spells of unemployment or incapacity for work or the maternity allowance period are separated by not more than 13 weeks they are linked together to form one period of interruption of employment. | |||||
Other medical benefits
| |||||||
| All mothers with income under IR £8,500 (£7,033·51) in the tax year ended 5 April 1981 are entitled to general practitioner services during pregnancy and infant welfare services free of charge. | |||||||
Maximum total benefit 100% of insurable earnings. | |||||||
Maximum benefit total 100% of insurable earnings. | |||||||
Maternity allowance scheme for women in employment
| |||||||
| Insured women in employment are on maternity leave from work under the Maternity Protection of Employees Act, 1981 and entitled to resume work with the same employer at the end of the maternity leave period. | |||||||
| The claimant must satisfy the contribution conditions for the receipt of maternity allowance under the general scheme or the claimant must have contributions paid in at least 26 weeks of insurable employment in the 12 months immediately preceding the first day of a period of maternity leave. | |||||||
| 80% of earnings in the relevant income tax year subject to a minimum payment of IR £45·75 (£37·86) a week. In 1982 the relevant income tax year is the 1980–81 year. | |||||||
| Payable for 14 weeks. The leave may commence as early as the 10th week but not later than the beginning of the 4th week before the expected confinement. | |||||||
Italy
| |||||||
Ante-natal leave
| Post-natal leave
| Qualifying conditions for cash benefits
| Cash benefits to employees
| Duration of cash benefit
| Qualifying conditions for reinstatement
| Reinstatement period
| Alternative re-engagement conditions
|
| 2 calendar months. | 3 calendar months. | Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| 5 months (2 months before and 3 months after the confinement). Optional absence for another 6 months until child is one year old. | Entitled to returns to her old job. | 3 calendar months after confinement women may exercise option to take further leave for any six months period up to child's first birthday. | If the woman exercises her option to take further leave (see previous column) employer must keep her job open for her. |
| Maternity leave may start earlier than the eight week before confinement if the Labour Inspectorate considers continued working "too onerous" and "detrimental" to the woman concerned. | Domestic workers must have at least 52 weekly insurance contributions in the 24 months, or 26 in the 12 months preceeding first day of leave. | Employee must have produced to employer a copy of certificate showing "Expected week of confinement" and must, within 15 days of confinement, produce a copy of the certificate of confinement. | |||||
| Unemployed women if insured and employment ended not more than 60 days before the beginning of antenatal leave, or not more than 18 days before where they are in receipt of unemployment benefit or have paid at least 26 contributions in the past two years. | |||||||
Netherlands
| |||||||
Antenatal leave
| Postnatal leave
| Qualifying conditions for cash benefits
| Cash benefits to employees
| Duration of cash benefit
| Qualifying conditions for reinstatement
| Reinstatement period
| Alternative re-engagement conditions
|
| 6 weeks | 6 weeks | Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| Entitled to return to her old job. | 6 weeks after confinement. | Leave following confinement may be extended if it is considered "medically necessary" |
| Insured women. | 100% of insurable earnings. | 12 weeks (6 weeks before and after confinement). | |||||
Maximum benefit
| |||||||
| 253·44 F1 (£53–64) a day, payable 5 days a week. | |||||||
Luxembourg
| |||||||
Antenatal leave
| Postnatal leave
| Qualifying conditions for cash benefits
| Cash benefits to employees
| Duration of cash benefit
| Qualifying conditions for reinstatement
| Reinstatement period reinstatement
| Alternative re-engagement conditions
|
| 8 weeks | 8 weeks | Maternity grant
| Maternity grant
| After maternity leave a woman is entitled to return to "the same or an equivalent job". | 8 weeks after confinement. | In the case of premature or multiple births or where the mother is breastfeeding the child leave following the confinement may be extended by 4 weeks. | |
| All residents. | 36,399 LFr (£500·50) payable in 3 instalments of 12,133 LFr (£166·83) each. | ||||||
1st instalment—paid when mother-to-be has had all the medical examinations required by law. | |||||||
2nd instalment—paid after the birth of the child. If desired the first and second instalments may be paid together after the birth of the child. | |||||||
3rd instalment—paid when the child has had the six medical examinations required by law. | |||||||
Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| Maternity allowance
| |||||
| Employed women. | 100% of earnings. | Usually 16 weeks (8 weeks before and 8 weeks after confinement but can be extended to 20 weeks. | |||||
| Insurance during 6 months in the year preceding confinement. | |||||||
Trade
Spain
asked the Minister for Trade what assessment he has made of the prospects for early improvements in the balance of trading opportunities with Spain.
I am happy to report a number of developments which will, I believe, result in a useful improvement in the opportunities for exports to Spain in advance of Spain's accession to the European Community.First, the Spanish Government have told the Community that they will shortly open duty quotas for a total of 15,000 cars from the Community for a period of 12 months. For 5,000 cars sold as between 1300 cc and 1600 cc the duty will be almost halved to 19 per cent. For 10,000 cars sold as between 2000 cc and 2600 cc the duty will be reduced by about a third to 25 per cent. It is the Spanish Government's intention to extend such quotas for further yearly periods. This does not constitute a renegotiation of the 1970 agreement between Spain and the European Community, but it is a unilateral gesture by the Spanish Government in response to growing expressions of concern by the Community and in particular by the United Kingdom.Secondly, the Spanish Government have expressed their firm intention to introduce VAT before the end of 1984. There has long been concern that certain Spanish fiscal practices have discriminated against imports generally, and in particular against imports of cars, and have added to Spain's protective barriers. This discrimination should disappear on the introduction of VAT. In the case of cars covered by the quotas, we believe it will result in a further reduction in the level of protection by at least five percentage points.
Thirdly, the Spanish Government have agreed to remove the discrimination in the maturation period required of imported, as compared with domestic, whiskies. We regard this as a helpful move in respect of an important British export.
Finally, the Spanish Government have agreed to remove three quotas—for special purpose motor lorries and vans, gold and rolled gold, and spirit varnishes—and undertaken to improve the administration of those which remain.
Tourism (Consultants' Review)
asked the Minister for Trade if he will announce his conclusions following the consultants' review of the British Tourist Authority and the English Tourist Board.
Estimates for 1983–84, published yesterday, included in the Department of Trade's Vote a provision for tourism which was prepared before I had reached my conclusions on the review of expenditure by the British Tourist Authority and the English Tourist Board carried out by the consultants Arthur Young McClelland Moores and Co. I have now completed my study of the consultants' report, and concluded that it is possible to make significant reductions in the published grants-in-aid to the BTA and the ETB for 1983–84, while in fact improving and increasing their ability to carry out what they were originally intended to do under the Development of Tourism Act 1969.My hon. and learned Friend will be glad to know that, in view of the great importance which this Government place on developing our tourist industry, the total sum available for the Department of Trade's suupport to tourism in the coming financial year should be maintained at the level shown in the Estimates, but that the expenditure on individual elements of support will reflect a substantial change in priorities, and a redeployment of resources.I intend to achieve these substantial improvements, with the agreement of the BTA and the ETB, by making a start in cutting out areas of waste, non-priority activities, overmanning, and needless duplication of effort by both boards and by redirecting the resources elsewhere towards the promotion of tourism.As regards the BTA, I intend to see increased the proportion of money which the BTA spends on promoting Great Britain abroad, which is its prime role, and to cut the amount of executive time, energy, and money which it spends within Great Britain, often duplicating work done, or which could be done, by other boards, organisations or by the trade. I have told the BTA that I wish it to withdraw from a range of activities within this country. For example, I have asked the BTA to withdraw completely from "Britain in Bloom", and other activities which I shall detail to it, and to close its information centre in St. James' street. For the BTA, the basic grant-in-aid for the next financial year will be £15·5 million, compared with £17·6 million shown in the Estimates published yesterday. There will be a consequential reduction in staff. The BTA will now be discussing the employment implications with its staff. However, I have also invited the BTA to propose an additional programme of overseas promotions, for which I intend to provide up to £1 million in 1983–84, making a total grant in aid of £16·5 million.
As regards the ETB, I have asked it, similarly, to change the balance of its activities, and to redeploy resources so that less money is spent on administration and on non-priority activities. For example, I have asked the ETB to withdraw its financial support from all point of entry information centres, except the one at Victoria station, London, which is operated by the London Tourist Board. The ETB is exploring what alternative financial arrangements can be made for the other centres affected. The ETB will increase the subvention to the regional tourist boards in England during 1983–84.
The ETB will give additional funds in particular to the London tourist board, whose role as the board presiding over this country's single most important tourist destination—a magnet for attracting tourists to the United Kingdom who, after visiting London, spread out to other parts of the country—I regard as especially important.
The ETB's grant-in-aid in 1983–84 will be £8 million as compared with the £9·7 million shown in the Estimates. There will be a consequential reduction in posts. The ETB will now be discussing the employment implications with its staff. At the same time, however, I propose to increase the amount of money available, through the ETB, to the tourist industry, under section 4 of the 1969 Act, from £5·3 million to just over £8 million in 1983–84. This should be of substantial benefit to the private sector and to local authorities' tourist projects.
Both the BTA and the ETB will now be submitting their detailed operating budgets for 1983–84 on the basis of these new figures.
This parliamentary answer must be seen in the context of further, far-reaching proposals I have in mind for the development of tourism in Britain. There is an increasing awareness that tourism will play a vital part in Britain's economic future. We must ensure that new resources flow into tourism and leisure development, and that our tourist institutions are in a position to meet new challenges. I shall return to the fundamental steps needed to put the growth of tourism on a sound footing in a future statement, giving my conclusions on these and other aspects of my review, next month.
Consumer Credit
asked the Minister for Trade if he will consider, in conjunction with the Glass and Glazing Federation, a system of vetting applications for licences under the consumer credit licensing system in order to protect consumers purchasing double glazing.
The Consumer Credit Act 1974 requires each applicant for a licence to satisfy the Director General of Fair Trading that he is fit to engage in the activities covered by the licence. I see no reason to make any change in the licensing system.
Aviation Facilities
asked the Minister for Trade when he expects to publish his Department's review into the need for and availability of business aviation facilities in southeast England.
I shall reply to my hon. Friend as soon as possible.
Textile Goods
asked the Minister for Trade what was the balance of trade in textile goods for 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
Northern Ireland
Agriculture (Smuggling)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement on the problems associated with the smuggling of agricultural produce in Northern Ireland; and whether he has reached any conclusions in his discussions with Ministers and officials of the Republic of Ireland in respect of this matter.
The smuggling of agricultural produce between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland to avoid payment of United Kingdom monetary compensatory amounts—MCAs—is of concern to the Governments of both the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland.Officials of the Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Customs and Excise, the Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce and the Ministery of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food have held meetings with Republic of Ireland officials to devise measures to prevent the avoidance of MCAs. These meetings resulted in the very helpful introduction by the Irish authorities of controls over the ultimate use of commodities to combat the abuse of traffic in certain of them. United Kingdom MCAs have been negative since 14 March and a meeting was held some days ago to consider measures to deal with the possible consequences of this development
Animal Health
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what progress he has made in his discussions with Ministers and officials of the Republic of Ireland concerning animal health affecting the Republic and Northern Ireland.
The discussions which take place on a regular basis between Northern Ireland officials and their counterparts in the Republic of Ireland on all aspects of animal health matters affecting Northern Ireland and the Republic are helpful in the maintenance of the high animal and poultry health status in both jurisdictions.
Prisons (Staff)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will list for each prison in Northern Ireland the approved prison officer staffing and the vacancies for such staff that exist in each prison.
As at 25 February 1983 the approved staffing levels and vacancies were as follows:
| Approved level | Vacancies | |
| Her Majesty's prison, Belfast | 517 | 40 |
| Her Majesty's prison, Armagh | 150 | 17 |
| Her Majesty's young offenders centre | 222 | 35 |
| Prison service college | 12 | Nil |
The staffing levels at Her Majesty's prisons at Maze and Magilligan are currently under review, and it is not possible to give figures for these eastablishments at this stage.
Social Services
National Insurance
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what, in each case, would be the estimated increase in revenue in 1983–84 from raising the maximum employee's and employer's contribution for national insurance to £1,260 and £1,435, respectively, on a contracted-out basis.
It is not clear what the hon. Member means by "a contracted-out basis" in this context. The maximum contributions given could be achieved by various combinations of changes to the upper and lower earnings limits and the rates of contribution, and the effect on revenue cannot be estimated without more detail of what the hon. Member has in mind.
Supplementary Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list the income disregards, capital limits and other specific sums mentioned in the supplementary benefits regulations, the dates at which these sums were fixed at their present level, and the amounts to which they would have to be raised in November 1983 to make good their loss of value since they were fixed at their present level, assuming 5 per cent. inflation in the year to November 1983.
The information requested in respect of resources which are partially disregarded under the supplementary benefit resources and single payments regulations is as follows:
| Resource | Present level of disregard | Date fixed at present level | Level of disregard needed at November 1983* |
| £ | £ | ||
| Capital: | |||
| for weekly benefit | 2,500 | November 1982 | 2,625 |
| for single payments | 300 | November 1978 | 507·26 |
| for single payments | |||
| for voluntary | |||
| repatriation | 50 | November 1975 | 118·72 |
| Earnings: | |||
| unemployed claimants | 4 | November 1980 | 5·00 |
| single parents | 4 plus ½ earnings from 4 to 20 | November 1980 | 24·98 |
| others | 4 | November 1975 | 9·50 |
| Miscellaneous income: | |||
| (war and industrial pensions, charitable payments etc.) | 4 | November 1975 | 9·50 |
| Occasional gifts | 100 | November 1982 | 105 |
| Educational maintenance allowances: | |||
| children at school | 7·50 | September 1979 | 11·01 |
| young people at college | 9·50 | September 1979 | 13·95 |
| Student grants † | 2 | September 1976 | 4·26 |
* on the basis of the assumptions in the question to give same real value as at date fixed (measured by retail prices index to November 1982 and by assumed 5 per cent, increase in retail prices November 1982 to November 1983). | |||
| † where student is a single parent or is disabled or is the partner of the claimant and has a dependent child. |
The upper limit on the amount of a single payment payable for repairs to a claimant's home was set at £225 in November 1978. It would need to be raised to £380·45 on the assumptions in the question.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will estimate the numbers of people who would no longer claim supplementary benefit if (a) the earnings related supplement scheme were restored at the level immediately prior to its abolition and (b) the present abatement of national insurance benefits were restored.
For the effect of the abatement of national insurance benefits alone I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Stockport, North (Mr. Bennett) on 9 February 1983.—[Vol. 36, c. 402–3] No information is available on the effect of the abolition of earnings-related supplement—ERS—but, so far as unemployment benefit—UB—is concerned, the first retailed statistics which show the extent of dependency on supplementary allowance following the abolition of ERS will be available soon. This should enable a broad assessment to be made of the extent to which the abatement and abolition of ERS have increased the number of UB recipients claiming supplementary benefit. I will write to the hon. Member when this has been prepared.
Benefits
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many married couples are receiving supplementary benefit in (a) England, (b) Scotland and (c) Wales at the latest available date; what were the figures in March 1982; and what is the estimated cost in this financial year and for the last financial year.
The numbers at December 1981, the latest date for which information is available, and the approximate costs for the year 1981–82 were as follows:
| England | Scotland | Wales | |
| Number (thousands) | 695 | 76 | 49 |
| Approximate cost (£ million) | 1,270 | 140 | 90 |
Source:
Annual statistical inquiry and expenditure in 1981–82—regular weekly payments of supplementary benefit only.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish a table in the Official Report showing for (a) England, (b) Scotland and (c) Wales the number of children in respect of which supplementary benefit is being paid in each part of the
| Benefit | Date of highest rate in real terms | Actual rate at date in col. (2) | Rate at November 1982 prices | Actual rate at November 1982 | Net cost raising November 1982 rate to rate in col. (4) in a full year |
| (£ per week) | (£ per week) | (£ per week) | (£ million) | ||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| Invalidity benefit | November 1979 | 23·30 | 31·97 | 31·45 | 25 |
| Sickness benefit | November 1977 | 14·70 | 25·58 | 25·00 | 6 |
United Kingdom in each of the age bands, under 11 years, 11 years to 15 years, 16 years to 17 years and those over 18 years, indicating for each band and area the total sums estimated for the current financial year and the sums required for the last financial year.
The numbers of dependent children in families receiving supplementary benefit at December 1981, the latest date for which information is available, were as follows:
| England thousands | Scotland thousands | Wales thousands | |
| Under 11 years | 870 | 103 | 69 |
| 11–15 years | 374 | 51 | 26 |
| 16–17 years | 45 | 4 | 31 |
| 18–19 years | 4 | * | * |
| * Less than 500. | |||
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many single householders in (a) England, (b) Scotland and (c) Wales, respectively, are receiving supplementary benefit at the latest available date; what were the figures in March 1982; and what is the estimated cost in the current financial year and the cost for the last financial year.
The numbers at December 1981, the latest date for which information is available, and the approximate costs for the year 1981–82 were as follows:
| England | Scotland | Wales | |
| Number (thousands) | 1,747 | 188 | 114 |
| Approximate cost (£ million) | 2,030 | 210 | 125 |
Source: Annual statistical inquiry and expenditure in 1981–82—regular weekly payments of supplementary benefit only.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he will publish in the Official Report a table showing for each class of benefit the highest rate payable since 1975 in real terms and his estimate of the cost in 1983–84 of raising the benefit to this rate.
In the majority of benefits the highest rate payable since 1975 in real terms is the November 1982 rate currently in force. The following table shows those benefits which had a higher real value at an earlier date since 1975 and the net cost of increasing the current rates to these levels:
| Benefit | Date of highest rate in real terms | Actual rate at date in col. (2) | Rate at November 1982 prices | Actual rate at November 1982 | Net cost raising November 1982 rate to rate in col. (4) in a full year |
| {£ per week) | (£ per week) | (£ per week) | (£ million) | ||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| Unemployment benefit | November 1977 | 14·70 | 25·58 | 25·00 | 30 |
| Maternity allowance | November 1977 | 14·70 | 25·58 | 25·00 | 4 |
| Child benefit | April 1979 | 4·00 | 6·09 | 5·85 | 125 |
Housewives (Invalidity Benefit)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what percentage of claimants for the housewives non-contributory invalidity benefit unsuccessful at a local tribunal were finally awarded the benefit by the Social Security Commission in each of the last five years in Wales;(2) how many claimants in Wales have been successful in obtaining the housewives non-contributory invalidity benefit; what percentage of the total claims for each year the successful claimants represent; and what percentage of failed claims are successful after going through an appeals procedure before a local tribunal for each of the last five years;(3) how many claimants in Wales received the housewives non-contributory invalidity pension; how many received in addition extra payments for adult dependants; and how many receive extra benefits for children.
I regret that the information is not available as the statistics are held only for Great Britain as a whole.
Zomax
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he was satisfied with the safety of the drug Zomax when it was given a product licence; and what new circumstances have arisen since then;(2) if he will make a statement on the reasons for the withdrawal of the drug Zomax in the United Kingdom;(3) how many adverse reactions and deaths have been reported from the drug Zomax; and what is his estimate of the actual totals, whether or not reported;(4) if he intends to revoke the product licence of the drug Zomax, or allow it back on the market at a later date;(5) why the notification to doctors of the withdrawal of the drug Zomax has been left to the drug company; and if he will take the necessary steps to ensure that all doctors are notified of the decision immediately;(6) what discussions he has had with the United States medical authorities about the drug Zomax;(7) whether he or the drug company concerned initiated discussions which led to the withdrawal of the drug Zomax.
The drug Zomax has been withdrawn in the United Kingdom by Ortho-Cilag Pharmaceutical Ltd. following the company's decision to withdraw the drug in the United States of America. In neither country was this withdrawal at the instigation of the drug regulatory authorities although officials in the two countries have since been in close touch on the matter. The company has said that the withdrawal is temporary, pending discussions about changes in prescribing information in the United States of America. The decision followed reports in the United States of America of five cases in which patients had suffered severe allergic reactions and had died.The pattern of adverse reactions reported to be associated with Zomax in the United Kingdom is similar to other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Prescribing information here includes warnings that allergic reactions may occur, particularly in patients known to be sensitive to aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The Committee on Safety of Medicines has received 512 reports of adverse effects associated with the drug, five of which were fatal. I must emphasise that these reports do not necessarily indicate a causal relationship between the drug and the suspected reaction. Twenty-two of the reports concerned suspected severe allergic reactions similar to those described in the United States, but none was fatal.It is not possible to use reports to the committee to estimate the actual incidence of adverse reactions to a drug, because not all reactions are recognised or reported, and the degree of under-reporting is not known.The licensing authority was satisfied that the benefits of Zomax outweighed the risk when the drug was given a product licence and, on the basis of the evidence currently available to us, that remains the case. The licensing authority is therefore not proposing at present to take any action to revoke or vary the product licence and I understand that the United States Food and Drug Administration takes a similar view.
Overseas Service Volunteers
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will consider introducing regulations which would make it possible for Voluntary Service Overseas and other such organisations to continue the payment of class 1 contributions on behalf of the volunteers whilst they are on service overseas, in order to make those requiring it eligible for unemployment benefit upon their return to the United Kingdom.
Voluntary workers are treated in the same way as other people going abroad. They pay class 1 contributions during the first 52 weeks abroad if they work under a contract of service for an employer who has a place of business in the United Kingdom, if they are ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom and if they were resident in the United Kingdom immediately before their employment abroad began. Anyone who pays 52 class 1 contributions in these circumstances will be treated as having paid class 1 contributions throughout his period abroad and will generally qualify for unemployment benefit on his return to the United Kingdom. After the first 52 weeks, or if he is not liable to pay class 1 contributions, a person can pay voluntary class 3 contributions to protect his future rights to retirement and widows pensions. Anyone who is not entitled to unemployment benefit on his return to this country and is suffering financial hardship can claim supplementary benefit. We have no plans to alter the present rules.
Chromosomal Disorders
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will consider financing extra centres, in addition to University College hospital, where early abnormal chromosomal disorders, such as Down's syndrome, can be detected, to enable early termination of pregnancy to be offered to mothers when such chromosomal defects are present.
Techniques are already being developed in a number of centres for detecting, early in pregnancy, foetal abnormalities that may be caused by genetic factors.
Dental Treatment (Anaesthesia)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will introduce legislation to make it mandatory for qualified anaesthetist to be present at all dental extractions or procedures when general anaesthesia is practised.
No. The Government do, however, support the action now being taken by the General Dental Council to draw up guidance to the dental profession, as part of its disciplinary rules, on the administration of general anaesthesia. This will provide that the doctor or dentist who administers a general anaesthetic should be appropriately trained or, for teaching purposes, under the direct supervision of such a person. It will also be laid down that, other than in exeptional circumstances, the anaesthetic should not be administered by the operating dentist.
Abortion Counselling (Merseyside)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will recommend to the Mersey regional health authority that a counselling service be resumed at the Mersey regional day care abortion unit in accordance with his circular, "Health Service Development Arrangements for Counselling of Patients Seeking Abortion".
The Mersey regional health authority is aware of the problems which have arisen at the regional day care abortion unit following the resignation of four lay counsellors. The authority has established a panel to examine the issue. That panel is still taking evidence and discussing the problems with those involved.
Widows (Contributions And Benefit)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many widows pay reduced rate contributions; whether entitlement to reduced rate in the case of widows is confined to those who are entitled to widows benefit under the national insurance scheme; and whether widows benefit is payable regardless of the level of earnings or other income.
Provisional figures—excluding members of Her Majesty's forces—show that 156,000 widows paid reduced rate contributions in 1980–81. Entitlement to continue to pay at the reduced rate after an initial period is confined to widows who are entitled to widow's benefit or an industrial or war widow's pension at least equal to the standard rate of basic national insurance widow's pension. Widow's benefit is payable regardless of the level of earnings or other income.
Geriatric Care
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many day care geriatric departments now function; and how many patients they serve in total.
This information is not collected centrally.
Family Planning Clinics
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he will require family planning clinics to seek information from persons under 16 years as to (a) whether the general practitioner was informed, (b) whether advice was received as well as contraception, (c) whether the patient feared she was pregnant, (d) whether the parents were aware that the patient was attending the clinic, (e) whether the patient agreed that the parents should be told, (f) what the reasons were if the parents were not told, and (g) whether the patient subsequently became pregnant.
I refer my hon. Friend to my replies to him on this subject on 27 October 1982—[Vol. 29, c. 436–37.] As I indicated then, the Department's existing guidance stresses the need not to undermine parental responsibility and family stability in the provision of contraceptive advice to young people, and the consequential importance of involving parents as closely as possible. I do not consider that further guidance is necessary.
Histopathologists (Leeds)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many histopathologists there are in Leeds; and if he is satisfied that a sufficient level of cover is being maintained.
Full information on the number of histopathologists working in the two Leeds health districts is not held centrally.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what effect the University Grants Committee cuts on histopathology departments in the university of Leeds will have on National Health services in Leeds.
I understand that in the light of the resources available to it the university of Leeds has reduced its establishment in histopathology by one lecturer post with honorary registrar status: and that the clinical duties of the post holder are being absorbed by existing NHS staff.
Elderly Persons (Vitamin Intake)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will establish a departmental investigation into the effects of low vitamin intake in the elderly.
The Department has already carried out studies on the relationship between vitamin intake and health in the elderly. The results were published by Her Majesty's Stationery Office in 1972 and 1979 in the series "Reports on Health and Social Subjects" Nos. 3 and 16. When vitamin deficiency leading to malnutrition occurs in this group, it is almost invariably associated with clinical disease or conditions such as depression following bereavement.
Dental Treatment (Waiting List)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people in Grimsby are at present waiting for an appointment with a dental specialist; how many were waiting on 1 March 1981 and 1 March 1979; and what was the average waiting time for such appointments at each date.
Statistics are compiled on a district and regional basis. For Grimsby health authority the latest information available shows that, at 31 March 1982, 175 patients were on a waiting list for treatment by a dental specialist. At 31 March 1981 and 31 March 1979 the figures were 97 and 127, respectively. Information on average waiting time is not collected by the Department.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people in Oxford are at present waiting for an appointment with a dental specialist; how many were waiting on 1 March 1981 and on 1 March 1979; and what was the average waiting time for such appointments at each date.
Statistics are compiled on a district and regional basis. For Oxfordshire health authority the latest information available shows that, at 31 March 1982, 259 patients were on a waiting list for treatment by a dental specialist. At 31 March 1981 and 31 March 1979 the figures were 280 and 418, respectively. Information on average waiting time is not collected by the Department.
Nurses (Special Hospitals)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many nurses convicted of assault against patients are employed in the special hospitals; and if he will list the offences concerned.
Three Rampton hospital nurses convicted of ill-treatment of patients under section 126 of the Mental Health Act 1959 are currently suspended from duty pending the outcome of their appeals against conviction.
Heating Allowances
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how much has been spent on supplementary heating allowances since the inception of the scheme.
The information requested is readily available only for the last five years. Government expenditure on supplementary benefit heating additions between April 1978 and April 1982 was £623 million; it is estimated that expenditure in the year 1982–83 will be £325 million. Further information could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Pensioners
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people in Great Britain were of pensionable age in 1978, 1980 and 1982.
The estimated number of people in Great Britain who were of pensionable age—that is, aged 65 or more if male, and aged 60 or more if female—was 9,439,700 in mid-1978, and 9,606,400 in 1980. These figures will be revised later this year as a result of the 1981 census. Estimates for mid-1982 will be published later this year, but the latest projected figure, based on the results of the 1981 census, is 9,903,000.
Mr G Bowskill
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he will ensure that Mr. G. Bowskill will not be re-employed at Rampton hospital at any time in the future.
No decisions have yet been taken on Mr. Bowskill's future employment.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether Mr. G. Bowskill is at present working in a National Health Service hospital with mentally handicapped patients in his care.
Yes. I refer the hon. Member to my reply to his earlier question on 27 October last year.—[Vol. 29, c. 433.]
Nurses
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what information he has as to the movement of nurses from the National Health Service to private hospitals and nursing homes; and if he will make a statement.
Information is not available centrally about the movement of nurses between the National Health Service and the private sector of health care.
Consultants
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he has any information as to the number of consultants employed wholly in the private sector in each year since 1975; and if he will make a statement.
No.
Orthotists
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) whether he will seek to adjust the Whitley pay scales to increase the number of orthotists employed in the National Health Service;(2) if he will make a statement about the reasons for the shortage of qualified orthotists at the Royal National orthopaedic hospital.
I know of no evidence that suggests that services to patients generally, which have traditionally been provided by a combination of relatively few directly employed staff and a preponderance of staff employed by independent contractors, would be improved by the recruitment of more orthotists to the NHS. However, I am asking the Department and the Whitley council concerned to consider problems of recruitment and retention in NHS centres where special work is undertaken, such as the Royal National orthopaedic hospital.
Male Midwives
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what conclusions he has reached following the consultation with health authorities' professional bodies and other interested parties on the report "Male Midwives: A Report of Two Studies".
The conclusion we have drawn is that the present restrictions on the training and employment of men as midwives should now be lifted. We shall be presenting orders to the House later this year under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 to enable this change to be made with effect from 1 September 1983. We will be asking health authorities to ensure that women have the right to choose to be attended by a female midwife. We shall also be asking health authorities to make provision for male midwives to be chaperoned as necessary.
Occupational Pension Schemes
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he has reached a decision regarding the representations made to him about the premiums payable from 6 April 1983 by occupational pension schemes which buy back into the state scheme.
Following technical discussions between the Government Actuary and the pensions interests, I have today laid before the House amending regulations which limit to 25 per cent. the premium increases to be phased in from 6 April 1983.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when he intends to ban the practice known as the franking of benefits by occupational pension schemes.
Draft regulations have today been referred to the Occupational Pensions Board for its advice and report.The draft regulations affect all people who leave contracted-out employment before state pension age but after the regulations come into operation, and ban the practice of "franking" in respect of the guaranteed minimum pension—GMP—rights they have accrued in that employment since 6 April 1978. "Franking" is the practice, now widely regarded as objectionable, whereby the statutory requirement to revalue GMP rights from the time of leaving up to pension age is met by reducing, or sometimes extinguishing, the pension rights in excess of the GMP.The regulations also limit the deductions for state scheme benefit which are made from deferred pensions by schemes which provide a target pension including the state pension.In making these changes, the regulations will fully implement the recommendation made on franking by the Occupational Pensions Board in its report on early leavers—Cmnd. 8271. They carry forward the undertaking I made to the House, in my reply to my hon. Friend on 19 October 1982—[Vol. 29, c.
71]—that the Government would prohibit the practice of franking in
relation to pension rights accruing in the future. In fact the regulations will, as I have said, apply to all GMP rights accrued in the relevant employment since April 1978 up to the date of leaving but will apply only to future early leavers.
The regulations, which I hope will come into operation later this year, will ensure a fairer deal for the early leaver. I hope also that schemes will consider whether they can avoid further franking for those who have already left.
Defence
Nuclear Deterrent (Costs)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what percentage of defence equipment costs were attributed to the British nuclear deterrent in each of the years 1970 to 1982; and what are the latest estimates of the percentage of those costs borne by (a) the British nuclear deterrent and (b) so far as is consistent with security, for the Trident programme in each of the years until 1995.
It is not the practice to provide a detailed year by year breakdown of our expenditure on the strategic nuclear deterrent. For information about total projected expenditure on the strategic nuclear force and the Trident programme over the period 1980 to 1995, as a proportion of planned equipment expenditure, I refer my hon. Friend to the 1982 Statement on the Defence Estimates—Cmnd. 8529–1—(figure 4) and Defence Open Government Document 82/1(figure 6).
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what percentage of defence costs were attributed to the British nuclear deterrent in each of the years 1970 to 1982; and what are the latest estimates of the percentage of those costs borne by (a) the British nuclear deterrent and (b) so far as is consistent with security, for the Trident programme in each of the years until 1995.
I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave ny hon. Friend the Member for Cheltenham (Mr. Irving) on 24 January 1983.—[Vol. 35, c. 353] The estimated percentage of the defence budget absorbed by the nuclear strategic force in the financial year 1970–71 was 1·4 and in the financial year 1971–72, 1·3.
Public Relations
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what was the total expenditure and number of staff employed by his Department on public relations activities in 1981–82; and what were the comparable figures for 1976–77 with expenditure given at 1982 prices.
I refer ny hon. Friend to the reply given to my hon. Friend the Member for Cheltenham (Mr. Irving) on 24 January 1983.—[Vol. 35, c. 353–54] Figures for past years are not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate expense.
"Nuclear Defence—Key Points
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how the availability of the pamphlet "Nuclear Defence—Key Points" was brought to the attention of the British Atlantic Committee, the Council for Arms Control, the Coalition for Peace through Security and the Conservative party.
At the time of publication, in October 1982, copies of this aide memoire were sent to the bodies concerned.
Binary Nerve Gas Weapons
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if Her Majesty's Government will make it their policy not to agree to the deployment in the United Kingdom of the binary nerve gas weapons for which the President of the United States is seeking congressional approval in his budget proposal FY 84 CW.
Her Majesty's Government have received no approach from the United States Government about the possible deployment of United States chemical weapons in the United Kingdom, and none is expected.
Mycotoxins
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make available to the House the results of the investigations by scientists in his Department, under the auspices of the United States of America, into the alleged use of mycotoxins, yellow rain, as weapons in Laos and Kampuchea.
No investigations are being carried out by Ministry of Defence scientists under the auspices of the United States of America. Our independent investigations are continuing, but we are not yet in a position to make a statement about the results.
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Food Prices
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food by how much food prices increased in 1980, 1981 and 1982, respectively.
In the 12 months to January 1981. retail food prices rose by 8·9 per cent., in the 12 months to January 1982 by 11 per cent., and in the 12 months to January 1983 by only 1·9 per cent.
Council Of Agriculture Ministers (Meeting)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the outcome of the Council of Agriculture Ministers meeting in Brussels on 14 and 15 March; and if he will make a statement.
Together with my right hon. Friend the Minister of State, I represented the United Kingdom at the meeting of the Agriculture Council in Brussels on 14 and 15 March.The Council continued its discussion of the Commission's price proposals for 1983–84. I stressed that the Commission's latest figures, which point to a level of FEOGA guarantee expenditure in 1983 substantially above the budget provision, strongly reinforce our view on the need for price restraint, particularly for those commodities in structural surplus. The Council will resume its discussion on these matters at its next meeting on 28 March.The Council finally adopted a regulation permitting the full implementation of the New Zealand butter quota for 1983 of 87,000 tonnes which had been agreed in principle last October.There was also some discussion, following an intervention by the French Minister, on the link between the operation of the milk marketing boards and the high level of liquid consumption in the United Kingdom. After I had pointed out that consumption in the other member states would benefit if they adopted similar arrangements to those in this country, the Commission undertook to produce a report on the level of consumption in the different areas of the Community.