Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 39: debated on Thursday 24 March 1983

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Thursday 24 March 1983

Trade

Light Bulbs (Yugoslavia)

asked the Minister for Trade if he will list in the Official Report the value and number of domestic light bulbs over 28 volts imported from Yugoslavia from 1978 to the most recent convenient date.

The available information is as follows:

United Kingdom imports from Yugoslavia of filament light bulbs exceeding 28V
19781979198019811982
Value £ thousand cif47665
Number, thousand7001,105

Source: Overseas Trade Statistics of the United Kingdom, SITC (R2) Item 778.21 (part).

Note: —=zero; 0=number less than 500.

Coastguard Resource Control Review

asked the Secretary of State for Trade if he is consulting the relevant unions on the report on the coastguard resource control review; and when he expects to be able to publish the report.

The review team report on the resource control review of Her Majesty's Coastguard was sent to my departmental trade union side on 9 March, with a request for its views before I take decisions on its recommendations. I am placing a copy of the report in the Library, and I shall make further copies available on request.

Exports

asked the Secretary of State for Trade whether he will publish in the Official Report a table showing for each of the past two years the increase in United Kingdom exports to the oil producing countries, together with his forecast for the current year in the light of the fall in the price of oil.

The value of exports to the oil exporting countries from 1975 to 1982 is set out in the March issue of the "Monthly Review of External Trade Statistics"—table B.19. I prefer not to venture an estimate for 1983.

Scotland

Employment Statistics

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people were unemployed in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area in February 1983, expressed (a) numerically and (b) as a percentage; and what are the corresponding figures for males and females, respectively.

The following table provides the information requested on the numbers of unemployed claimants in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area on 10 February 1983:

MaleFemaleTotal
Number of people unemployed22,8989,76232,660
Unemployment percentage rate14·27·711·6

Note:

The Edinburgh travel-to-work area comprises the employment office areas of Edinburgh, Leith, Portobello, Dalkeith, Loanhead, Musselburgh and Penicuik.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the percentage increase in (a) total and (b) male unemployment in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area and Scotland, respectively, between January 1982 and January 1983.

The percentage increase in (a) total and (b) male unemployed claimants—the new basis of the count—in Scotland between January 1982 and January 1983 was nine per cent. and 8·9 per cent., respectively. Figures for the Edinburgh travel-to-work area are not available on a comparable basis. but the following table gives the numbers of (a) total and (b) male unemployed registrants—the old basis of the unemployment count—at January 1982 and the number of unemployed claimants—the new basis—at January 1983.

Numbers Unemployed in Edinburgh travel-to-work area
TotalMales
January 1982 (registrants)32,47022,746
January 1983 (claimants)33,35123,520

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) what has been the numerical and percentage change in the numbers employed by age group in both Dundee and Scotland between May 1979 and the latest available date;(2) what has been the numerical and percentage change in the numbers employed per standard industrial classification order in both Dundee and Scotland between May 1979 and the latest available date.

Rateable Values

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what changes there were in industrial rateable values in each Scottish region in the financial years 1979–80, 1980–81 and 1981–82.

Information confined to industrial rateable values alone is not available centrally. The following table gives rateable values relating to industrial and freight transport subjects in the authorities concerned as at 1 April 1979, 1980 and 1981.

Rateable values of industrial and freight transport subjects

Authority

Rateable values 1 April 1979

Rateable values 1 April 1980

+ or -

Per cent.

Rateable values 1 April 1981

+ or -

Per cent.

£

£

£

£

£

Borders1,623,6761,627,298+3,622+0·21,644,883+17,585+1·1
Central23,678,87023,667,352-11,518-0·0425,344,881+ 1,677,529+7·1
Dumfries and Galloway2,185,2822,292,846+107,564+4·92,359,479+66,633+2·9
Fife10,742,59411,108,239+365,645+ 3·411,275,794+ 167,555+ 1·5
Grampian11,823,99411,533,978-290,016-2·512,161,847+627,869+ 5·4
Highland4,652,6844,621,588-31,096-0·74,938,601+ 317,013+6·9
Lothian14,768,18614,171,354-596,832-4·014,449,900+278,546+ 1·9
Strathclyde72,364,33670,547,043-1,817,293-2·564,577,844-5,969,199-8·5
Tayside7,741,7687,225,759-516,009-6·77,318,655+92,896+ 1·3
Orkney5,779,6291,914,961-3,864,668-66·91,911,408-3,553-0·2
Shetland787,004488,976-298,028-37·9450,979-37,997-7·8
Western Isles296,278320,056+23,778+8·0335,341+ 15,285+4·8

Parliamentary Constituencies

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether an Order in Council has now been made in the terms of the draft Parliamentary Constituencies (Scotland) Order.

Yes. The Parliamentary Constituencies (Scotland) Order 1983 was made on 16 March.

Schools Inspectorate

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he has considered the future role of Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Schools in Scotland; and if he will make a statement.

I am today publishing a policy statement on the role and future operation of the inspectorate. This follows the completion of a scrutiny of the inspectorate within the programme co-ordinated by Lord Rayner. Copies of the statement and the scrutiny report are available in the Library.It is important that the country gets value for the massive resources which are invested in education, and the inspectorate has a key role to play in this. It will provide an audit of the system by assessing and reporting on the quality of education being provided. It will identify cost-effective ways of meeting educational needs and indicate desirable and attainable norms of quality. It is already nearing completion of a study of the management of secondary schools and further work of this kind will be undertaken.The education system has to adapt to meet changing needs and has to find ways of improving the quality of education. The inspectorate plays a crucial part in the system and the value of its work has been widely recognised. It has to give a lead in bringing about change as in the implementation of the Government's action plan for 16 to 18-year-olds.Its findings must be made more readily available to the customers of the education system—pupils, students, parents and employers. One way in which this will be achieved is by publishing promptly reports of general inspections of schools and colleges. Not only will this influence the institutions inspected, but other schools and colleges will examine their own standards in the light of the reports, and parents and employers will be better informed about what they should require of the education service. This will lead to greater accountability to the general public.To carry out the enhanced role of the inspectorate there will have to be careful matching of staffing resources to the tasks being undertaken. It is important that staffing should be flexible and that it should be possible to bring in teachers and others who are leaders in their field to work on particular projects.Copies of the policy statement are being sent to each education authority and to a wide range of other bodies concerned with education.

Unemployed Voluntary Action Fund

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will increase the resources allocated to the unemployed voluntary action fund.

I had already announced that £300,000 would be allocated to the fund in 1983–84. In the light of representations received from the trustees, I have now decided to increase that figure to £500,000 and, in addition, I am making available a further £50,000 in the present financial year. I hope that this increase in the level of funding will enable many more worthwile projects to get under way.

Atorney-General

Public Records

asked the Attorney-General what proportion of papers, considered worthy of preservation, are retained by Government Departments for periods in excess of 30 years for administrative purposes or other special reasons.

Departments may, subject to the Lord Chancellor's approval, retain 30-year-old records under the provisions of section 3(4) of the Public Records Act 1958. Details of the categories of papers retained under these provisions are given in a leaflet for readers to be issued shortly by the Public Record Office. I am sending a copy of the final draft of this leaflet to the hon. Member and I shall place a further copy in the Library.

asked the Attorney-General if he will list the categories of papers considered worthy of preservation which are normally retained by Government Departments for periods in excess of 30 years for administrative purposes or other special reasons.

This varies widely between Departments, but the overall proportion is estimated to be no more than 1 per cent. of all records selected for permanent preservation in any one year.

Anglo-Argentine Relations (Public Records)

asked the Attorney-General which Cabinet, Cabinet Committee, or Chief of Staff Committee and sub-committee files relating to the Falklands or Anglo-Argentine relations have been removed from public scrutiny at the Public Record Office.

[pursuant to his reply, 3 March 1983, c. 177–178]: I understand that records falling into these categories which had been temporarily returned to the Departments concerned under the provisions of section 4(6) of the Public Records Act 1958 have now been restored to the Public Record Office.

Prime Minister

Engagements

Q4.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q5.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q6.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q7.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q8.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q9.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q10.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q13.

asked the Prime Minister whether she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q14.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q15.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q16.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q17.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q18.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q19.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q20.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q21.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q22.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q23.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q24.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q25.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q26.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q27.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q28.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q29.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q30.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q32.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q33.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q36.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q37.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q38.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q39.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q40.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

Q41.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q42.

asked the Prime Minister whether she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

Q43.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 24 March.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 24 March.

This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in the House, I shall be having further meetings later today. This evening I shall be attending a dinner given by President Kaunda.

Trades Union Congress

Q11.

asked the Prime Minister if she plans to meet the Trades Union Congress general council.

Seaside Towns

Q12.

asked the Prime Minister how many official visits she has paid to seaside towns in the United Kingdom since 1979.

Textile And Clothing Industries

Q31.

asked the Prime Minister if, in the course of her visit to the north-west announced in her answer of 8 February, Official Report, c. 295, she will meet representatives of both sides of the textile and clothing industries.

I visited the north-west on 17–18 February. I did not hold a meeting of the kind suggested.

Wages Councils

Q34.

asked the Prime Minister if she will make a statement on recent proposals by wages councils for increased wages in their respective industries.

Wages councils should take account of the effects of increases in minimum rates on employment. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Employment emphasised that when he wrote recently to the two retail wages councils.

European Parliament

Q.35

asked the Prime Minister when Her Majesty's Government will be replying to the House of Lords report on direct elections to the European Parliament; and if she will make a statement.

The European assembly's proposals for a uniform electoral procedure would require member states to hold European assembly elections under a list system of proportional representation with three to 15 member constituencies and to give the vote to all their nationals irrespective of their place of residence in the community. The report on these proposals by the House of Lords Select Committee on the European Communities makes no recommendation on the electoral system and does not therefore call for a reply. On the franchise, the Committee recommends that the Government should give the vote in time for the 1984 European Parliament elections to all

"British subjects"—
British citizens and other Commonwealth citizens—
"who have within a fixed period of, say, 10 years, been registered as electors for parliamentary elections in the United Kingdom".

As my noble Friend the Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department said in another place on 14 March—[Vol. 440, c. 558]—the Government's view is that legislation in this field must wait for agreement to be reached in the Council of Ministers. The Committee did not recommend a debate.

Disarmament Talks

Q.44

asked the Prime Minister if she is satisfied with the progress being made at the disarmament talks.

It would be wrong to expect quick results from negotiations for balanced and verifiable agreements, but the response of the Soviet Union to the far-reaching Western proposals has so far been disappointing. We must continue to negotiate with patience and determination.

Mail (Surveillance)

asked the Prime Minister if she is satisfied that the arrangements for the surveillance of mail to Ministers and Government Departments are adequate to ensure the safety of staff and Post Office staff handling such mail.

We are always seeking to improve our arrangements for screening mail, but our system has prevented serious injuries to staff for many years and the vast majority of postal bombs have been intercepted.

Information Technology (Ministerial Responsibilities)

asked the Prime Minister what are the responsibilities of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Lord Privy Seal and the Secretary of State for Industry for information technology in the Government service.

The responsibility for identifying, implementing and managing the application of information technology in Government Departments rests with the Ministers in charge of those Departments.The Chancellor of the Exchequer is responsible for approving supply for those Departments—including information technology equipment, services and related administrative expenditures—and for the technical advice and procurement support given to Departments by the central computer and telecommunications agency of the Treasury.The Lord Privy Seal is responsible for general policies on Civil Service management, efficiency and personnel work—one aspect of which will be the impact of information technology—and for the training support given to Departments by the management and personnel office. The Secretary of State for Industry has no direct responsibility for information technology in Government. He seeks to promote the use of information technology in the private and public sectors wherever it can improve performance and be of real help.

No 10 Downing Street (Cycle Parking)

asked the Prime Minister what facilities are provided for cycle parking at No. 10 Downing Street for visitors and staff.

Staff who cycle to work are able to park their bicycles on the premises, and there is usually no problem over the parking of visitors' bicycles.

Government Buildings (Cycle Parking)

asked the Prime Minister if she will list those headquarters buildings within central Government with cycle parking facilities for (a) staff and (b) visitors.

I regret that the information requested by the hon. Member is not readily available an could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Timex Factory (Redundancies)

asked the Prime Minister if Her Majesty's Government will reverse the decision that workers at the Timex factory, Dundee who accepted voluntary redundancy received an ex gratia payment that is part of their final pay to be considered as pay in lieu of notice, in order to allow them to qualify for unemployment benefit; and if she will make a statement.

Decisions on unemployment benefit entitlement are made not by the Government, but by the statutorily appointed independent adjudicating authorities and I am unable to intervene in their decisions.

Taoiseach (Talks)

asked the Prime Minister if she will make a statement on the substance and outcome of her talks with the Prime Minister of the Republic of Ireland in Brussels on Tuesday 22 March.

My meeting with Dr. FitzGerald, which took place in the margins of the European Council, lasted about 45 minutes. The talks were informal and introductory in character and covered a number of matters of concern and interest to us both.

European Council

asked the Prime Minister whether she will make a statement following the meeting of the European Council in Brussels on 21 and 22 March.

I attended the European Council in Brussels on 21–22 March with my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. Copies of the conclusions have been placed in the Library.The Council took place against the background of the European monetary system realignment at which my right hon. and learned Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer played a distinctive role.The Council discussed the Community strategy for reestablishing economic stability and encouraging productive activity without renewed inflation. It agreed on the need for effective action to improve employment prospects for young people and called for a report by June on the progress achieved by the Community and its member states.In a preliminary discussion of the forthcoming economic summit in Williamsburg it was agreed that the Community should make a substantial effort to support the recovery of the international economy which is now appearing. The Council judged that falling oil prices could make a positive contribution to such recovery provided excessive changes in prices were avoided and efforts to conserve energy and develop new sources were not impaired.The Council heard a report of recent discussions between the Community and the United States on made in agricultural products and noted arrangements for these discussions to continue.Progress was made on removing the obstacles in the way of Spanish and Portuguese accession to the Community, notably in respect of arrangements for olive oil, fruit and vegetables. Agriculture Ministers have been asked to take early decisions on these matters.On the budget, it was agreed that the Commission would now make specific proposals about the long-term future financing of the Community to include a lasting solution to the British budget problem. The Foreign Affairs Council will report its conclusions to the next meeting of the European Council in June and will also then report its decisions on the arrangements for the interim period until the lasting solution can be implemented. Provision for refunds for the 1983 budget year will be incorporated in the draft Community budget for 1984.With regard to the middle east, it was agreed that the parties must seize the present opportunity to achieve the urgent objectives of the withdrawal of all foreign troops from the Lebanon and a resumption of negotiations for a comprehensive peace settlement. A declaration by the Palestinian people and the PLO that they were in favour of peace negotiations would be a major step forward, as would a commitment by Israel to refrain from enlarging existing settlements or creating new ones in the occupied territories.

Education And Science

Departmental Efficiency

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list and describe the studies from within or without his Department relating to the effectiveness and efficiency of his Department together with the recommendations and action taken on those recommendations.

[pursuant to his reply, 22 November 1982, c. 341–42]: My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales and I are today publishing a policy statement on the functions and future operations of Her Majesty's inspectorate. This follows the completion in 1981 of a scrutiny of the inspectorate within the programme co-ordinated by Lord Rayner, the report of which is also being published. Copies of both documents are available in the vote office.We are all aware that, despite much dedicated effort, standards of education need to be improved. Families as well as the education system have a vital part to play. Much can be and is being done to improve the performance of our schools and colleges and their ability to ensure that each pupil receives an education appropriate to his or her needs both as an individual and in relation to the society in which he or she will live. In this task of securing higher standards, the inspectorate plays an important and effective role which this Government intends to strengthen.

The Government have given a vigorous lead. We have increased parental choice and are taking steps to improve the quality of the teacher force. We have asked LEAs to review their policies for the school curriculum and have launched pilot projects for the 40 per cent. of pupils for whom external examinations are not generally appropriate. We are taking steps to improve the system of examinations at 16-plus and 18-plus and for the prevocational education of those over compulsory school age. Our new initiative in the provision of technical and vocational education will start in September.

Her Majesty's inspectorate makes a crucial contribution by the advice it gives to us and the help it gives to the rest of the education system and those who use it. Its effectiveness depends on a sound and up-to-date knowledge of the education system, a proper sense of standards and the choice of priority targets. Inspection needs to be directed not only towards current policy concerns but particularly to the safeguarding for all children of suitable education opportunities. The inspectorate continues to be much occupied with improving the effectiveness of the initial training of teachers and their induction into the service; with the changes needed to meet new demands arising from technological change and youth employment; and with the effective education of ethnic minority pupils and of children with special needs.

But none of the inspectorate's activities can have its full effect on the education system without the understanding and action of those who have responsibility for providing education. The inspectorate can help them understand better how far the system on the ground matches the legitimate aspirations of the community and provides value for money. To this end the inspectorate's audit function will be more sharply focused through the recently introduced programme of whole LEA inspections as well as inspections of individual institutions.

Formal inspections will continue at their current rate of some 260 each year in England and Wales. The publication of the inspectorate's reports is being speeded up and, most importantly of all, since the beginning of this year we have made those reports publicly available and have introduced more systematic arrangements for ensuring effective follow-up.

Copies of the policy statement are being sent to each local education authority and to a wide range of other bodies.

17-Plus Examination

[pursuant to his oral reply, 22 March 1983, c. 715]: I have today invited the Business and Technician Education Council and the City and Guilds of London Institute to establish joint arrangements for a national system of pre-vocational education which will include the Certificate of Pre-Vocational Education—17-plus—qualification, on behalf of and accountable to my right hon. Friends the Secretaries of State for Education and Science and for Wales.These arrangements will fill an important gap in our provisions for young people who wish at 16 to stay on in school or go to FE college for a year in order to continue their full-time education so as better to prepare themselves for the world of work, or for specific vocational courses.The central role in the system will be played by a joint board for pre-vocational education accountable to my right hon. Friends through the councils of the two bodies. The board will have a chairman and 13 other members. The chairman will be appointed by my right hon. Friends. The chairman and members will act in a personal capacity and will reflect the interests of teachers from schools and FE, the local authorities, industry and commerce and Wales. Five members will be nominated by the Business and Technician Education Council and five by the City and Guilds of London Institute. The Royal Society of Arts, the GCE boards collectively and the CSE boards collectively are entitled to nominate one member each. The Government's support for the work of the board will be reflected by the appointment of assessors from the Education Departments, Her Majesty's inspectorate, and the Manpower Services Commission.The joint board will have three essential tasks:

  • 1. to accredit courses, normally of one year full-time duration, for young people in schools and FE colleges from September 1983, of necessity building very closely on existing provision;
  • 2. to develop more complete and coherent arrangements as urgently as possible, preferably by September 1984 and no later than September 1985, which will include the replacement of those grouped pre-vocational courses being offered by bodies for which there is provision for representation on the joint board;
  • 3. to ensure co-ordination and, where appropriate, common curriculum content with relevant part-time provision and with provision made in association with the Manpower Services Commission.
  • My right hon. Friends are prepared to make available a grant not exceeding £150,000 per annum for three years beginning in April 1983 to help meet the launching and development costs of the joint board in its early phase of operation.

    Church Schools

    asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list his powers and the powers of local education authorities in respect of proposals to withdraw funding from or close Church schools.

    Where a local education authority intends to cease to maintain any voluntary school it must publish proposals for that purpose in accordance with section 12 of the Education Act 1980. These proposals fall to my right hon. Friend to decide; he has no powers to require the closure of any maintained school other than through approving proposals published by the local authority concerned.

    Industry

    Industrial Assistance

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry when the changes announced by the Chancellor of the Exchequer in his Budget speech will be available in updated pamphlets covering all forms of assistance to industry and new enterprise, such as the enterprise allowance.

    The Budget changes will be reflected in the British Business "Guide to Industrial Support" which is being published on Friday 25 March, and in the booklet "How to make your business grow" issued on the same day as part of the current campaign to market small firms measures. Pamphlets on individual schemes will be revised as and when details are settled.

    Civil Service

    Non-Industrial Staff (Leeds)

    asked the Minister for the Civil Service when volume two of the report on the pilot ethnic survey of certain non-industrial civil servants in Leeds, covering applicants for Civil Service posts in the area, will be published; and what action the Government intend to take next.

    I am pleased to tell my hon. Friend that volume two of "Ethnic Monitoring in the Civil Service: A Survey in Leeds" is published today. Copies of the report have been placed in the Library. This volume covers the survey of applicants for civil Service posts in Leeds for the period 1 May to 30 September 1982. Of those issued with the questionnaire 89·1 per cent. completed the ethnic origin question, 5·3 per cent. of whom classified themselves as belonging to an ethnic minority.The Government have decided to gain broader experience of ethnic monitoring by arranging to hold surveys of the ethnic origin of non-industrial civil servants in the north west economic planning region and in the county of Avon during the autumn. some recruitment schemes in both areas will also be monitored.

    Employment

    Wages Councils

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) if he will give, for each wages council and for each division of the wages inspectorate; (a) the number of establishments covered by wages council orders, (b) the numbers of workers covered by wages council orders, (c) the numbers and percentages of wages council firms inspected and found to be infringing wages council orders, (d) the numbers and percentages of workers found to be underpaid, and (e) the numbers of workers paid arrears and the amount of such arrears;(2) if he will publish for each year from 1977 to 1982 information on the numbers and proportions of inspections by wages inspectors which

    (a) included a visit to the establishment or (b) were carried out by post; whether there was any significant variation in these proportions either between different wages council industries or between different regions of the wages inspectorate; and whether there are any planned changes in these proportions in 1983.

    Newham (Long-Term Unemployment)

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will give the figures for the number of unemployed in Newham for 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and the number in each year who were under the age of 25 years and the number each year who had been continuously unemployed for 12 months or more.

    The following table gives, for the East Ham, Plaistow and Stratford jobcentre areas, which correspond closely to Newham, the total number of registered unemployed, together with the number who were aged under 25 years and the number who had been unemployed for more than 52 weeks. The figures relate to October in each of the years specified.

    Registered unemployed
    Totalof which
    aged under 25 yearsunemployed for more than 52 weeks
    October 19786,2412,3281,401
    October 19795,5822,0601,184
    October 19809,2163,8271,181
    October 198114,4636,1913,121
    October 198216,0386,5565,494

    Small Firms Employment Subsidy

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment through the operation of the small firms employment subsidy, what was the estimated ratio of sustained new jobs to the total number of jobs subsidised.

    I regret the information requested is not available and could only be obtained at a disproportionate cost.

    Manufacturing Industry

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what proportion of employees in employment were in manufacturing industry in each year from 1972 to 1982.

    The following table gives, for Great Britain, at September in each of the years specified, the proportion of employees in employment in manufacturing industries.

    Employees in Employment
    Manufacturing industries as a percentage of all industries
    September 197235·2
    September 197334·7
    September 197434·5
    September 197532·8
    September 197632·4
    September 197732·4
    September 197831·9
    September 197931·1
    September 198029·5
    September 198128·0
    September 1982*27·3
    * provisional estimate

    Unemployment Statistics

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what was the percentage increase in (a) total and (b) male unemployment in the United Kingdom between January 1982 and January 1983.

    Between January 1982 and January 1983 there was an increase of 10·9 per cent. in the number of male unemployed claimants and 11·4 per cent. in the total number of unemployed claimants in the United Kingdom The figures on which these percentages are based include school leavers and are not seasonally adjusted.

    Community Programme

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people have been employed since October 1982 under the auspices of the community programme who live within each of the areas covered by the Hereford city council and the south Herefordshire district council respectively; and how many schemes are involved.

    In the area covered by Hereford city council there are two community programme projects which will employ 12 people, and in the area covered by south Herefordshire district council one project employing one person. Nine workers have started on the programme since October 1982.It is expected that a further 30 places will be created by Hereford and Worcester county council and a similar number by local voluntary organisations. In addition, Hereford city council has decided to set up a community programme agency, and is considering how many places to apply for.

    Wales

    Rate Support Grant (Gwynedd)

    asked the Secretary of Sate for Wales what is the annual estimate of population for the county of Gwynedd (a) on which the rate support grant settlements have been made for each year from 1970 to 1983 and (b) on the basis of latest available census information.

    The county of Gwynedd came into existence on 1 April 1974. The estimates of population used in the rate support grant settlements since that date, and the dates to which the estimates refer, are as follows:

    SettlementEstimatePopulation
    1974–75June 1972219,890
    1975–76June 1974223,500
    1976–77June 1975224,600
    1977–78June 1976225,700
    1978–79June 1976225,700
    1979–80June 1977226,800
    1980–81June 1978226,400
    1981–82June 1979226,300
    1982–83June 1980226,700
    1983–84June 1981233,000
    The June 1981 estimate used for the 1983–84 settlement was based on the 1981 census and is the latest available estimate. The basis of estimation was population usually resident in the county. Estimates for earlier years were based in the 1971 census and the basis of estimation was population present in the county. The rate support grant settlements for the years 1974–75 to 1980–81 were dealt with by the Department of the Environment for all local authorities in England and Wales. Since 1981–82 the rate support grant settlements for Welsh local authorities have been dealt with by the Welsh Office.

    Suicides

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many suicides there were in Wales in each of the last 10 available years.

    Cause of death is classified by the international classification of diseases—ICD. Information on suicide and self-inflicted injury, ICD 950–959, is given in the following table:

    Number of deaths from suicides and self-inflicted injury in Wales
    Numbers
    1971206
    1972189
    1973218
    1974222
    1975189
    1976207
    1977269
    1978249
    1979232
    1980236

    Area Health Authorities (Properties)

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is his estimate of the numbers of dwellings currently owned by area health authorities in Wales.

    Hydatidosis

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales what provision is being made to control hydatidosis in mid-Wales.

    The sum of £35,000 is included, as a new service, in the 1983–84 Estimates for agricultural support, Wales—Class XVI, Vote 2. Pending parliamentary approval of the 1983–84 Estimate, expenditure of up to £15,000 required from April onwards to continue a control programme previously funded locally, will be met by repayable advances from the Contingencies Fund.

    House Of Commons

    Members (Travel Costs)

    asked the Lord President of the Council what is the total cost per annum for the travel of hon. Members on parliamentary and constituency duties.

    The total cost of hon. Members' travel on parliamentary and constituency duties during 1981–82 amounted to £2,538,900.

    Overseas Development

    India (Laparoscopes)

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to the answer of the Minister of State, Official Report, 14 March, c. 27, when the agreement was made with the Government of India to provide 100 laparoscopes.

    Officials of the Government of India were informed in a series of discussions with our high commission in Delhi in early March of our readiness to supply the laparoscopes. Details of supply arrangements are now being discussed with the Indian authorities and a formal agreement will follow.

    Tanzania

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the occasions in the last year when a Minister in his Department has discussed with the Tanzanian high commissioner the subject of bilateral British aid to Tanzania.

    The Tanzanian high commissioner called on my predecessor, my right hon. Friend the Member for Banbury (Sir N. Marten) on 28 July and 1 September 1982, and I had the pleasure of a call from him on 21 March.

    Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

    Research Establishments (Grants And Loans)

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list all research establishments receiving grants or loans from his Department with the amount of assistance provided in 1981–82 and planned for 1982–83.

    A grant of £169,400 was paid to Long Ashton research station in 1981–82. Since then no grants or loans have been made to any research establishments. My Department commissions research on contract with a number of establishments and organisations, including the Agricultural Research Council, the Natural Environment Research Council, the Sea Fish Industry Authority, food research associations, Hydraulics Research Station Ltd. and various universities.

    Intensive Farming

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food to what extent Her Majesty's Government have reviewed and revised policy towards the conclusions of the Brambell report on conditions of animals in intensive farming.

    The Government's policy on animal welfare in intensive farming was set out in their White Paper (Cmnd. 8451) responding to the Agriculture Committee's report on animal welfare in poultry, pig and veal calf production. Following the advice of the Farm Animal Welfare Council—FAWC—and with approval of Parliament, the Government have revised the welfare codes of recommendations for cattle and pigs and issued new regulations controlling certain mutilations of farm animals. Comments on proposals for revision of the codes for domestic fowls and turkeys are being considered. The FAWC is reviewing the welfare codes to recommend those parts that may most suitably be made mandatory.

    Animals (Exports)

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether he has made a re-examination of the rules and enforcement methods applying to the export of live animals.

    Yes. In the light of that re-examination the Agriculture Ministers in Great Britain made the Export of Animals (Protection) Order 1981. We also actively supported the adoption of the further European Community measures to protect animals during international transport which were adopted by the Council of Ministers as directive 81/389/EEC.

    Milk

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what percentage of milk produced in the European Community is not consumed in the Community.

    It is estimated that Community milk production in 1982 represents 4,113,000 tonnes of butterfat and 9,368,000 tonnes of solids not fat. The equivalent of 14·6 per cent of the butterfat production and 11·7 per cent. of the solids not fat production were exported in 1982 and were thus not consumed in the Community.

    Transport

    Local Railway Schemes (Funding)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport what funding is available to local authorities or passenger transport authorities wishing to finance, or part-finance, the development of railway schemes within their local authority area.

    The sources of funding are:

  • (a)the authorities' own resources, which are supplemented by
  • (b)rate support grant and
  • (c)in England and Wales, transport supplementary grant
  • In addition, authorities may apply for grants from the European regional development fund to finance specific schemes.

    New Construction Costs

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport why the proportion of new construction cost assessed by his Department in the annual road track statements allocated to goods vehicles has fallen from 26·9 per cent. in 1975–76 to 21·4 per cent. in 1982–83.

    The proportion of new construction costs allocated to goods vehicles over 3·5 tonnes gross vehicle weight has fallen from 25·9 per cent. in 1975–76 to 22·8 per cent. in 1982–83 because during this period the number of these goods vehicles fell while the number of cars, light vans and motor cycles increased. As a result, the latter vehicles now carry a greater share of road cost.

    Lead-Free Petrol

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will introduce legislation requiring that (a) all new cars sold in the United Kingdom from 1 January 1985 are equipped to run on lead-free petrol and (b) all petrol stations have lead-free available for sale no later than 1 January 1985.

    No. The decisions already announced by this Government will reduce the annual lead emissions from motor vehicles from 1986 onwards to around one third of the average level during the 1970s.

    Roads (Capital Spending)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport what was the percentage change in real terms in capital spending on trunk roads and motorways in England since 1978–79.

    There has been an impressive increase on the previous Administration's performance in 1978–79. At constant prices capital spending is expected to be more than 17 per cent. higher in 1982–83 than it was in 1978–79. The following table gives the details for each year since 1978–79.

    Capital Expenditure on English Trunk Roads and Motorways since 1978–79
    Trunk Roads and Motorways
    1978–79528
    1979–80519
    Percentage(-1·8)
    1980–81479
    Percentage(-9·4)
    1981–82557
    Percentage(+5·5)
    1982–83*650
    Percentage(+23)
    * Forecast

    Note: Percentages show changes since 1978–79 in each case.

    Environment

    Rates

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the local authorities in order of the level of rates they impose starting with the highest.

    The following is a list of local authorities placed in order of the level of their local rates-precepts in 1982–83, along with the actual level of these local rates-precepts in that year.

    List of local authorities placed in order of the level of their local rates-precepts in 1982–83
    Local rate precept poundage in 1982–83 (pence)
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne197·5
    Manchester186·2
    Sheffield181·8
    Haringey181·8
    Rochdale173·5
    North Tyneside163·8
    Brent161·1
    Waltham Forest160·8
    Walsall158·1
    Newham157·0
    Avon156·0
    Wigan154·0
    Humberside153·0
    Sunderland151·8
    Cleveland150·0
    Cheshire149·4
    Northumberland149·0
    Tameside149·0
    Bury147·5
    Bedfordshire147·2
    Doncaster146·9
    Liverpool144·0
    Barnsley143·5
    Isles of Scilly143·3
    Cumbria143·0
    Berkshire142·8
    St. Helens140·8
    Gateshead139·8
    Derbyshire139·0

    Local rate precept poundage in 1982–83 (pence)

    Nottinghamshire139·0
    Durham137·0
    Bradford136·6
    Knowsley136·5
    Coventry135·7
    Staffordshire134·0
    Hertfordshire134·0
    Dorset133·0
    Sandwell131·9
    Gloucestershire131·5
    Hereford and Worcester131·5
    Oxfordshire131·5
    Calderdale131·2
    Suffolk130·5
    Northamptonshire130·0
    Leicestershire129·5
    Warwickshire129·3
    South Tyneside1290
    East Sussex128·6
    Hampshire128·4
    Buckinghamshire128·1
    Wirral127·5
    Isle of Wight127·0
    Lancashire126·5
    Rotherham126·5
    Wolverhampton125·9
    Essex125·9
    Birmingham125·5
    Wakefield125·5
    North Yorkshire125·0
    Harrow125·0
    Devon124·8
    Somerset124·0
    Kent123·5
    Shropshire123·5
    Wiltshire122·6
    Oldham122·1
    Surrey121·3
    Hounslow121·2
    Cambridgeshire121·0
    Lincolnshire121·0
    Bolton120·1
    Norfolk120·0
    West Sussex119·0
    Cornwall117·5
    Leeds117·0
    Dudley116·1
    Stockport115·6
    Salford115·5
    Solihull114·5
    Kirklees113·2
    Trafford112·5
    Bexley111·8
    Sefton111·4
    Hillingdon108·5
    Havering105·6
    Barking and Dagenham105·4
    Enfield101·7
    Ealing97·2
    Barnet96·3
    Merton94·2
    Sutton92·4
    Redbridge89·4
    Bromley87·0
    Kingston-upon-Thames85·5
    Richmond-upon-Thames81·4
    Southward80·6
    Hackney78·3
    Camden74·7
    I.L.E.A.71·0
    South Yorkshire69·8
    Tower Hamlets69·3
    Croydon67·2
    Greenwich62·3
    Lewisham59·9

    Local rate precept poundage in 1982–83 (pence)

    Lambeth59·2
    Islington59·1
    Hammersmith and Fulham57·5
    Merseyside54·0
    Tyne and Wear51·2
    Thamesdown50·6
    Wansbeck46·0
    Harlow45·1
    West Yorkshire44·5
    Greater Manchester42·0
    West Midlands40·3
    Derwentside40·2
    Burnley40·1
    Darlington40·0
    Middlesbrough39·5
    Langbaurgh39·2
    Sedgefield37·9
    Stevenage37·6
    City of London37·3
    Blackburn37·0
    Norwich36·8
    Wear Valley35·6
    Kensington and Chelsea35·2
    Leicester34·7
    Crawley34·5
    Greater London CL34·4
    Brighton34·2
    Reading34·0
    Rossendale33·2
    Carlisle33·0
    Hyndburn32·8
    Chester le Street32·8
    Chesterfield32·5
    Basildon32·4
    Bristol32·2
    Adur31·3
    Great Yarmouth31·2
    Harrogate30·8
    Hertsmere30·5
    Scunthorpe30·0
    Blyth Valley29·5
    Corby29·0
    Cleethorpes28·8
    Easington28·6
    Pendle28·0
    Peterborough28·0
    Durham27·7
    Thanet27·6
    Copeland27·4
    Portsmouth27·1
    Nuneaton and Bedworth26·5
    Mansfield26·5
    N.E. Derbyshire26·2
    Bassetlaw26·2
    Wyre Forest26·1
    Dartford26·1
    Bolsover26·1
    Kingston-upon-Hull25·7
    Ipswich25·6
    Stockton on Tees25·1
    Hartlepool25·0
    Elmbridge25·0
    Eastbourne25·0
    Blackpool25·0
    The Wreckin24·8
    Westminster24·7
    Bournemouth24·5
    Lincoln24·0
    Warrington24·0
    Hereford23·8
    Welwyn Hatfield23·6
    Preston23·6
    Thurrock23·5
    Lancaster23·5
    Chester23·4

    Local rate precept poundage in 1982–83 (pence)

    Watford22·8
    Canterbury22·7
    Rushcliffe22·6
    Northampton22·5
    Ribble Valley22·4
    Allerdale22·1
    South Wight22·1
    Halton22·0
    Barrow in Furness22·0
    Rushmoor22·0
    Worcester22·0
    Worthing22·0
    Scarborough21·9
    Newcastle under Lyme21·7
    Shepway21·6
    Southampton21·5
    Ashfield21·4
    High Peak21·3
    Crewe and Nantwich21·1
    Ellesmere and Neston21·0
    Redditch21·0
    Tonbridge and Mailing20·9
    Sevenoaks20·9
    Erewash20·8
    Derby20·7
    Luton20·6
    Glanford20·5
    North Warwickshire20·4
    Richmondshire20·2
    North West Leicester20·2
    Three Rivers20·0
    East Yorkshire20·0
    Medina20·0
    Wellingborough20·0
    East Hertfordshire19·8
    Milton Keynes19·7
    Basingstoke and Deane19·6
    Vale Royal19·5
    Nottingham19·5
    Botthferry19·4
    Ashford19·2
    Kettering19·2
    Epsom and Ewell19·1
    Wychavon19·1
    Tynedale19·1
    Fareham19·0
    Tendring18·9
    Rother18·9
    West Derbyshire18·9
    Gedling18·8
    Melton18·8
    Gravesham18·7
    Oxford18·7
    Hart18·5
    South Bedfordshire18·4
    Waverley18·4
    Tunbridge Wells18·4
    West Lindsey18·2
    Amber Valley18·1
    Woodspring18·1
    West Norfolk18·0
    Southend on Sea18·0
    Stratford-on-Avon17·9
    Dacorum17·8
    North Wiltshire17·7
    Rugby17·6
    Epping Forest17·5
    Great Grimsby17·5
    Stoke-on-Trent17·5
    Craven17·5
    Shrewsbury and Atcham17·4
    Bracknell17·3
    North Hertfordshire17·3
    South Holland17·1
    East Staffordshire17·1

    Local rate precept poundage in 1982–83 (pence)

    Weymouth and Portland17·0
    Hastings17·0
    North Bedfordshire17·0
    Congleton16·9
    East Lindsey16·6
    West Lancashire16·6
    Christchurch16·5
    Tamworth16·5
    Wyre16·5
    Lichfield16·5
    Alnwick16·4
    Leominster16·4
    Carrick16·2
    East Hampshire16·2
    Guildford16·2
    Rutland16·1
    Winchester16·1
    Newark16·0
    St. Albans16·0
    Beverley16·0
    Poole16·0
    Castle Point16·0
    Runnymede16·0
    Daventry15·9
    Fylde15·9
    North Norfolk15·9
    Teesdale15·9
    Castle Morpeth15·8
    Dover15·8
    Waveney15·8
    South Shropshire15·8
    Wandsworth15·8
    South Derbyshire15·7
    Mid Sussex15·7
    Gosport15·7
    Mid Suffolk15·7
    Surrey Heath15·6
    Lewes15·6
    Cheltenham15·5
    Caradon15·5
    Eastleigh15·5
    Warwick15·5
    Restormel15·5
    Rochford15·4
    Woking15·4
    Slough15·4
    Teignbridge15·4
    Hambleton15·3
    Kerrier15·2
    Penwith15·2
    North Shropshire15·2
    Broxtowe15·1
    Charnwood15·1
    North Kesteven15·0
    Macclesfield15·0
    Boston15·0
    Maidstone15·0
    South Kesteven15·0
    Stafford14·9
    North Devon14·9
    Horsham14·9
    Harborough14·9
    Northavon14·9
    Reigate and Banstead14·9
    Swale14·8
    Braintree14·7
    Spelthorne14·7
    Mole Valley14·7
    Torbay14·5
    Oswestry14·5
    Bromsgrove14·4
    Ryedale14·4
    Malvern Hills14·4
    Bridgnorth14·3
    Arun14·3

    Local rate precept poundage in 1982–83 (pence)

    Test Valley14·2
    Sedgemoor14·2
    Fenland14·2
    Staffs. Moorlands14·2
    Torridge14·1
    South Ribble14·1
    South Hams14·1
    St. Edmundsbury14·1
    Vale of White Horse14·0
    Mid Bedfordshire14·0
    Forest of Dean14·0
    Taunton Deane13·9
    Chorley13·8
    Blaby13·7
    Newbury13·6
    North Cornwall13·5
    Mid Devon13·5
    Huntingdon13·5
    Oadby and Wigston13·5
    Plymouth13·4
    Rochester upon Medway13·4
    Havant13·4
    Kennet13·4
    Holderness13·4
    Stroud13·3
    Chichester13·1
    South Staffordshire13·0
    Exeter13·0
    Cambridge13·0
    Broxbourne12·9
    Wokingham12·8
    East Devon12·8
    South Oxfordshire12·6
    York12·5
    Cannock Chase12·5
    Berwick-upon-Tweed12·5
    Tandridge12·3
    Tewkesbury12·1
    New Forest12·1
    South Bucks12·1
    Salisbury12·1
    Cotswold12·0
    Forest Heath11·9
    Chiltern11·9
    Eden11·9
    Hinckley and Bosworth11·8
    West Somerset11·8
    Colchester11·8
    Cherwell11·8
    West Devon11·7
    Hove11·7
    Purbeck11·7
    Aylesbury Vale11·6
    Windsor and Maidenhead11·6
    Suffolk Coastal11·5
    Wycombe11·4
    Maldon11·3
    Breckland11·3
    East Northampton11·3
    Brentwood11·2
    Wimborne11·0
    Kingswood11·0
    Babergh10·8
    Wansdyke10·7
    South Norfolk10·6
    Broadland10·6
    South Lakeland10·5
    South Herefordshire10·4
    Selby10·3
    West Oxfordshire10·1
    Wealden9·9
    South Northampton9·8
    West Wiltshire9·6
    Uttlesford9·3
    South Cambridgeshire9·2

    Local rate precept poundage in 1982–83 (pence)

    Gloucester9·0
    West Dorset8·8
    Mendip8·3
    East Cambridgeshire8·2
    Yeovil7·9
    Chelmsford7·9
    Bath7·7
    North Dorset7·6
    Gillingham6·1

    Intensive Livestock Units

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what criteria he uses to decide whether intensive livestock units require specific planning permission; and if he will make a statement.

    Class VI of the General Development Order 1977 gives a general planning permission for the erection of agricultural buildings on agricultural land, subject to certain restrictions about size, height, and so on, where the land is more than one acre in area and the buildings are

    "requisite for the use of that land for the purposes of agriculture".
    An application for specific planning permission has to be made for a building which is not so requisite, or which falls outside the other restrictions in Class VI.There can be no categorical answer to the question whether intensive livestock units come within Class VI. Each case has to be considered on its own facts. The meaning to be given to the phrase

    "requisite for the use of that land for the purposes of agriculture"

    is clearly important. In the past, my right hon. Friend has applied two different criteria in deciding whether intensive livestock units come within Class VI. Until recently, the criterion was that a certain proportion of the foodstuffs for the animals in the intensive livestock units should be produced on the surrounding agricultural land. The second criterion, which was adopted when the first was seen to be incorrect in law, was that intensive livestock units had the same permitted development rights as other, more traditional farm buildings—that is, that the building must be intended for a purpose which is part of the agricultural activities carried out on the unit as a whole. Following a reconsideration of the matter in the light of legal proceedings, the view now is that the proper interpretation of Class VI requires a further modification of the criteria to be applied in determining whether an agricultural building is permitted by the GDO.

    For a building to be

    "requisite for the use of that land for the purposes of agriculture",

    the use of the building should be reasonably necessary, in the sense of being subordinate, ancillary or subservient, for the purposes of an agricultural activity carried out on the open land comprised in that agricultural unit. Although it will be a matter of fact and degree whether a particular building meets that test, it will be necesary for there to be a direct link between the building and the agricultural activities carried out on the open land at the time of the erection of the building.

    Rate Support Grant Settlement, Trafford

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he has concluded his consideration of the representations made to him by the metropolitan borough of Trafford about the treatment of expenditure on non-advanced further education in the rate support grant settlement for 1983–84.

    I have received representations from a number of authorities, including Trafford, that losses of grant arising from the new definition of the numbers of students undertaking non-advanced further education, used for the first time in the 1983–84 settlement, should be included within the safety net on grant changes.I have consulted the local authority associations on this issue. There was support for the change, provided it could be done without losses to the existing grant expectations of other authorities. My Department has now assessed the grant returns from 405 authorities and it is clear that the total claim for grant in 1983–84 will be some £57 million less than the total provision in the cash limit.This therefore makes it possible to agree to the proposal for the inclusion of the non-advance further education losses in the safety net for 1983–84. The authorities concerned are being advised of this today. The changes will be incorporated at the supplementary report stage.The effect of shortfall in grant applications is that instead of the clawback of grant that had been a feature of all recent grant settlements there will be in this year an increase in the grant entitlement for all grant-receiving authorities and they are being advised accordingly. This is a result of the effective operation of the grant system.

    Single Homeless People

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what was the total number of single homeless people in London in each of the past five years; and what is the estimated number for each of the next five years.

    I regret that information on the numbers of single homeless people is not available.

    Home Department

    Public Disorder (London)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will call for a report from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis concerning incidents of public disorder which occurred in Kilburn, London, on Wednesday 10 March; and if he will make a statement on the contents of the report.

    We understand from the Commissioner that at about 3.30 pm on Wednesday 9 March three youths in Salusbury Road NW6, who had apparently themselves had abuse shouted at them by another person, in turn shouted abuse at pupils leaving a secondary modern school. This led to a fight between the youths and about six of those from the school, which two police officers in a car came upon and attempted to stop. The officers had, however, to call for reinforcements. Whilst making an arrest, one of the additional officers was injured in an eye, requiring immediate surgery.During the disturbance four of the youths from the school were arrested. As a result, a crowd of about 150 people gathered outside Kilburn police station. Others attempted to find the three youths who had allegedly started the fight; the three were arrested by the police before any further confrontation could take place. Community leaders and teachers made efforts to persuade the crowd to behave peacefully, and they calmed down considerably when they learnt of the further arrests, although a substantial number of people remained outside the police station until late at night.Six of those arrested have been charged with offences under the Public Order Act 1936 and remanded on bail until 14 April; the seventh has been referred to the juvenile bureau for a decision on whether he should be charged.The injured officer has lost part of an eyelid but I am pleased to say that we understand that he is making good progress and that his sight will be unimpaired. And we welcome the readiness of responsible local people to assist the police in persuading others to moderate their behaviour.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will call for a report from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis concerning incidents of public disorder which occurred in Hackney on Saturday 12 March; and if he will make a statement on the contents of the report.

    We understand from the Commissioner that at 1.45 pm on 12 March about 180 people, with an open lorry carrying supporters at their head, began a march from Mare street, Hackney, calling for a public inquiry into the death of Mr. Colin Roach. The number of marchers had grown to about 275 by about 2.45 pm when they reached Stoke Newington police station, outside which they stopped and were addressed by a person on the lorry before resuming the march. Apart from a minor incident in Northwold road in which two people were arrested, the marchers had confined themselves to shouting abuse and allegations at the police. But, for reasons which are unclear, at about 4.45 pm, in Kingsland high street, there was some disorder at the front of the march, with scuffles between marchers and the police, attempts to free people who were being arrested and fighting between marchers. The incident lasted no more than one or two minutes. At the same time, the driver of the lorry was arrested as a result of an incident with a police officer, and the lorry was driven away, as prisoner's property, by the police. With order restored the marchers proceeded to Hackney town hall for a meeting, addressed from the steps by a number of speakers, which ended, without incident, at about 5.15 pm.One of the speakers had called for a march to City road police station in support of the people being held there who had been arrested earlier in the afternoon. At about 5.25 pm about 75 people set off on the march, growing to about 150 in number when they arrived, about 45 minutes later, outside the police station, where they mounted a noisy demonstration. About half the demonstrators left at 7 pm when they learnt that a number of the arrested people were to be released. At 7.15 pm the police moved to reopen the roadway outside the police station. There were some scuffles with the demonstrators and three arrests were made. The demonstrators then gradually left the area, without further incident.Altogether, 24 people were arrested in the course of the events and charged with offences including assault, the possession of offensive weapons, obstruction and the use of threatening behaviour. Six of the people were held in custody over the weekend and one of these was remanded in custody on Monday 14 March but released the following day. All 24 are now bailed, to appear in court on various dates. A total of 574 police officers were deployed throughout the duration of events on 12 March; 13 incurred minor injuries.My right hon. Friend shares the concern that the true circumstances of Mr. Roach's tragic death should be established and be widely accepted. But he does not believe that events such as those on 12 March serve these purposes. There is to be an inquest, which itself will be an occasion for a full, independent examination in public of both the medical and circumstantial causes of the death. Whilst that is the subject of a coroner's investigation, it would not be appropriate to establish another, separate inquiry into it or matters related to it. The local commander has demonstrated his desire to establish a relationship of trust between the police and all sections of the local community and my right hon. Friend hopes that all those who share his concern that there should be effective, responsible and responsive policing in Hackney will feel able to support and encourage his efforts.

    Sergeant O'leary (Correspondence)

    33.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member for Newham, North-West on 16 March, Official Report, c. 173, concerning the salary and allowances paid to suspended Sergeant O'Leary since 11 January 1979, what was contained in his letter to the hon. Member which was not available at the time when he replied to the parliamentary question; and whether he will now publish in the Official Report the letter to the hon. Member for Newham, North-West.

    As promised in my reply to the hon. Member's written question on 16 March—[Vol. 39, c. 173]—my noble Friend will write to the hon. Member. He will place a copy of that letter in the Library of the House.

    Truancy

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what information is collected by his Department on the number of offenders found guilty of offences related to truancy under the Education Act 1944; and if he will make a statement.

    The information referred to in the reply I gave to the hon. Member on 3 March—[Vol. 38, c. 1821—can be subdivided in various ways, including according to the area in which proceedings took place. It is considered that the majority of the findings of guilt under the Education Act 1944 were for offences related to truancy. The Department keeps in close touch with the Department of Education and Science and the Department of Health and Social Security about problems associated with truancy.

    Mr Joshua Nkomo

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department why Mr. Joshua Nkomo was met by four special branch officers, two immigration officers, two police inspectors, two sergeants, and two constables when he landed at Heathrow airport on 13 March; and what were the costs involved.

    Mr. Nkomo was met by, and had a brief discussion with, two Metropolitan police special branch officers. Immigration officers and other special branch and local police officers were carrying out their normal duties at Heathrow airport. No additional costs were incurred.

    Police Stations (Lay Visitors)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will consider introducing in the Metropolis the system of lay visitors to police stations being developed in Greater Manchester.

    My Department followed up my welcome for Lord Scarman's recommendation by consulting the local authority associations and police representative bodies. These consultations revealed broad agreement about both the benefits which lay visiting schemes might confer and the practical basis on which they could operate. The police made it clear that they would be willing to co-operate in arrangements which, while not hampering their work, might help to dispel suspicions about their treatment of suspects held in their custody.All consulted wished, however, to see arrangements narrower that those proposed by Lord Scarman in one respect. They believed that the presence of lay visitors at interviews of suspects would have drawbacks which would considerably outweigh its advantages.With this proviso, all those consulted were agreed that lay visiting arrangements should be tested in practice as quickly as possible. As my hon. and learned Friend has already indicated to Standing Committee J, at c. 928, I have concluded that the next step should be for pilot schemes to be set up in a number of areas, with the agreement and co-operation of the police authorities, on the basis of broad guidelines prepared by the Home Office in consultation with those concerned. I intend to establish at least one such scheme within the Metropolitan police district. I have received a helpful proposal from the community police consultative group for Lambeth in this connection and I am giving it careful consideration.I shall keep the House informed of progress.

    Civil Defence Volunteers (Training Aids)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what films, audio-visual programmes and publications are available from Government sources for training community civil defence volunteers; and when they were made.

    The Government expect the training of community civil defence volunteers to be undertaken by local authorities' emergency planning officers. A training package for use by emergency planning officers is under consideration. At present no specific material is provided for this purpose, but publications such as "Protect and Survive" and "Nuclear Weapons", and some of the Home Office circulars in the emergency series, will be valuable.

    Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what will be the estimated reduction in the numbers of people receiving compensation under the criminal injuries compensation scheme as a result of raising the minimum level for compensation awards from £250 to £400.

    I refer my hon. Friend to the reply I gave to a question by the hon. Member for Ormskirk (Mr. Kilroy-Silk) on 3 March.—[Vol. 38, c. 361–62.]

    Jurors

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will take urgent steps to introduce legislation to disqualify convicted criminals from jury service.

    The Government hope that the Juries (Disqualification) Bill, which received a Second Reading on 25 February, will be successful in strengthening the present statutory requirements.

    Voting Rights

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how soon he will complete his discussions regarding the grant of voting rights for British citizens living in other European Community countries; and if he will make a statement.

    This matter is now being examined by the Select Committee on Home Affairs as part of its inquiry into the Representation of the People Acts. We look forward to studying what the Committee has to say.

    Parliamentary Constituencies

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether Orders in Council have now been made in the terms of the draft Parliamentary Constituencies (England) Order and the draft Parliamentary Constituencies (Wales) Order, respectively.

    Mentally Disordered Persons

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he has yet reached any conclusion about the central collection of statistics of persons detained by the police under section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1959.

    I am unable to add at this stage to the answer I gave to the hon. Member on 3 February.—[Vol. 136, c. 169] When my right hon. Friend is in a position to announce his conclusions, he will do so.

    Prisoners (Suicides)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what are the terms of reference of the inquiry set up by Her Majesty's Chief inspector of prisons into suicides in prison; and if he can yet state when he expects to receive the report.

    I refer the hon. Member to the reply my right hon. Friend gave to a question by my right hon. Friend the Member for Spelthorne (Mr. Atkins) on 22 February 1983.—[Vol. 37, c. 400] Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Prisons expects to complete his study by the end of this year.

    Detained Persons

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what were the charges against each of the five men who have been on remand in custody for over two years and which are the prisons in which they are located.

    [pursuant to his reply, 15 February 1983, c. 89]: Of the five individuals mentioned in my reply of 27 January—[Vol. 35, c. 490–91.]—to the hon. Member, further investigation has shown:

  • (a) The total should have been four, as one had been dealt with in the intervening period for the initial offence and so should not have been included;
  • (b) Of the remaining four, two were in Brixton prison on 30 November 1982, one of whom was charged with assault and the other with robbery, attempted robbery, possession of firearms and conspiracy to possess firearms; one was in Pentonville prison charged with theft and going equipped for theft; and one was in Wandsworth prison charged with conspiracy to defraud and fraudulent trading;
  • (c) None of these four men had been on continuous remand in custody for the period of over two years: all of them had spent very substantial periods either on bail or unlawfully at large.
  • Social Services

    Mentally Disordered Persons

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people on a regional basis were detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1959 in the last three years.

    The only information I have relates to hospital admissions. The number of admissions under the section to National Health Service mental illness hospitals and units was as follows:

    Regional Health Authority197919801981
    Northern67127127
    Yorkshire292932
    Trent253435
    East Anglia412922
    North West Thames426484524
    North East Thames477504469
    South East Thames151284311
    South West Thames314291305
    Wessex151414
    Oxford125
    South Western183322
    West Midlands233328
    Mersey481
    North Western61011
    Boards of Governers (Special Health Authorities since 1 April 1982)1
    Totals1,5981,8801,906
    In addition, there were admissions to mental handicap hospitals as follows: One in North East Thames region and two in North Western region in 1979; one in North Western Thames region in 1980; one in North Western Thames region in 1981. There were no admissions to special hospitals under section 136 in any of these years.

  • 1. Some patients will have been counted more than once if re-admitted under section 136 during the year.
  • 2. Figures for 1982 are not yet available.
  • National Health Service

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if registers are kept within National Health Service hospitals and other establishments of goods in and goods out; and how many staff are employed in this connection.

    It is common practice for health authorities to maintain registers of goods received and stores control records; but it is known that movements of articles in use are frequently not documented and recent guidance has called for much more stringent security strategies to be developed. Information about the number of staff employed on this work is not available centrally.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he has considered the announcement of the chairman of the North West Thames regional health authority about the provision of resources for the Health Service, a copy of which has been sent to him by the hon. Member for Brent, South; and if he will make a statement.

    The total revenue allocation, including joint finance, made to North West Thames regional health authority for the financial year 1983–84 is £663·743 million. This total takes account of efficiency savings of 0·5 per cent. amounting to £3·308 million, which the regional health authority in common with all regional health authorities in England and Wales, has agreed to find from within the current revenue baseline. The region has been allocated growth money of £1·945 million which will be available for the development of new and improved services within the region. The authority is also continuing to allocate resources between districts so as to improve services in less well-provided districts. The regional health authority is responsible for the allocation of resources to district health authorities within the region and is allocating resources in line with the broad policies that it has agreed with Government in the course of the annual regional review process.

    Medical Students

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many cases there have been of medical students being sued by relatives of patients who died allegedly because they were treated by students.

    I have seen press reports to this effect but I am not aware of any such cases.

    Bone Marrow Unit (Northern Region)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if there are any plans to form a bone marrow unit within the Northern regional health authority.

    I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for South Shields (Dr. Clark) on 15 March 1983.—[Vol. 39, c. 147–48.]

    Solvent Abuse

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the number of (a) school-aged children and (b) others who were admitted to hospital as a result of solvent abuse for the last three years for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement.

    Information on hospital admissions relating solely to solvent abuse is not available.

    Invalidity Benefit Trap

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if the elimination of the invalidity benefit trap will be retroactive; and whether time already spent on invalidity benefit before the implementation date will qualify towards the years waiting period.

    Time spent on invalidity benefit before the implementation date will qualify towards the year's waiting period, but there will be no retrospective entitlement to the long-term scale rate.

    Benefits

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services to what extent social security payments, state pensions and other benefits have kept in line with price rises since 1979; and if he will publish figures.

    I refer the hon. Member to tables 5·1 to 5·10 of the Department's "Abstract of Statistics for Index of Retail Prices, Average Earnings, Social Security Benefits and Contributions", a copy of which is in the Library. These show for each uprating date to November 1982 the equivalent value of the principal benefit rates at November 1982 prices.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will estimate the extra number of people who will become eligible for supplementary benefit as a result of increasing pensions in line with the retail price index and supplementary benefit in line with the retail prices index, minus the housing element; and what will be the extra cost of administration.

    It is not possible to make such an estimate until the new benefit rates are known.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the latest cost of allowing all unemployed supplementary benefit claimants who have been on benefit for 12 months or more to claim the long-term rate of benefit.

    Unemployed men aged 60 or over already receive the long-term scale rate after they have been in receipt of supplementary benefit at the ordinary rate for one year. If this provision were extended to all unemployed claimants the estimated additional cost in 1983–84 would be £395 million—at November 1982 benefit rates, on the basis of the assumptions in "The Government's Expenditure Plans 1983–84 to 1985–86", Cmnd. 8789.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will update, in the light of decisions announced in the Budget statement, the figures given in his answer to the hon. Member for St. Pancras, North on 18 November 1982, Official Report, c. 289–90. concerning savings on benefits and pensions.

    The figures to which the hon. Member has referred cannot be updated. Moreover, since they were given, the circumstances have changed following the announcement of the Government's intention to restore the historic, or actual method of uprating social security benefits using, as the basis, the acutal movement in prices between May of one year and May of the next year. The 1983 uprating will not be determined until the increase in prices in the year to May 1983 is known in mid-June.

    Seat Belts (Kidney Donors)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what effect the compulsory wearing of seat belts has had on the supply of kidneys for transplants so far; what is his estimate of the future effect; what steps he is intending to take to increase efficiency in finding potential donors; and if he will make a statement.

    The average weekly number of kidney transplants notified to the United Kingdom transplant service in the seven weeks from 31 January 1983, when the wearing of seat belts became compulsory, was 21·6 compared with a weekly average of 22·1 in the 12 weeks immediately before that date. This is well within the margin of variation that normally occurs in these figures and provides no basis yet for estimating the future effect of the legislation.On the question of steps to increase the number of potential donors, I refer the right hon. Member to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Rugby (Mr. Pawsey) on 10 March. [Vol. 38, c.

    483–84.] We are working on a number of other initiatives directed at maintaining the recent improvement in the supply of kidneys for transplantation.

    Camberwell Resettlement Unit

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many Camberwell resettlement unit users have been resettled in other accommodation as part of the running down of the unit; and if he will make a statement on his plan to close the unit and replace it with smaller units run by voluntary organisations.

    The programme for the replacement of Camberwell resettlement unit announced by my predecessor on 20 November 1981—[Vol. 13, c. 264]—included proposals for the provision over the next five years of 985 bed spaces in hostels, the funding of which would be provided by the Department of the Environment, the Housing Corporation and the DHSS. To date 24 projects providing 214 bed spaces have been approved. All but two of these are expected to become operational between now and the spring of 1984 During this period there will be a commensurate running down of the accommodation provided at Camberwell.

    Single Homeless Persons

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many bed spaces are currently available for occupation by single homeless men and women in London in (a) Department of Health and Social Services resettlement units; (b) local authority hostels and (c) hostels run by voluntary organisations; and what are the corresponding figures for each of the past five years, and the expected figues for each year up to 1985.

    I am advised by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment, who is responsible for policy on hostels, that information in the form requested at (b) and (c) is not held by his Department.The figures for resettlement units are as follows:

    Unit

    Number of bed spaces

    1978

    1979

    1980

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1984 Proposed

    1985 Proposed

    Camberwell850550550550550

    *300

    †300
    Spur House150150150150150150150150
    Pound Lodge8080808080808080
    Bridge House120120120120120120120120
    Lancelot Andrews House6060606060606060
    West End House80808080805050120
    Cedars Lodge:
    men7070707070

    *100

    100100
    women3030303030

    *

    Camden: women3535353535404040
    TOTAL
    men1,4101,1101,1101,1101,110

    *860

    †860660
    women6565656565

    *40

    4040

    * Proposed figures as from autumn 1983.

    † A further reduction in capacity at Camberwell will be made during 1984.

    Note:

    Under the Camberwell replacement scheme the Housing Corporation, Department of the Environment and DHSS will be funding 985 new hostel bed spaces over the next five years to replace Camberwell resettlement unit.

    Local Authorities (Joint Funding Allocations)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what are the criteria for a local authority receiving an increased joint funding allocation through deprived inner city weighting.

    Ten per cent. of the funds available for joint finance in England are distributed with a bias towards those regions which contain partnership or programme authorities as designated by the Department of the Environment. Health authorities are advised to take account of local circumstances when making funds available for schemes, including social deprivation and relative deficiencies in primary health care and related social services.

    Sexually Transmitted Diseases

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services on what professional advice candidiasis, scabies, hepatitis B, cytomegalovirus, entamoeba, and treponemal diseases are listed as sexually transmitted diseases in the annual report of the chief medical officer of the Department of Health and Social Security for the year 1981, "On the State of the Public Health"; and if he will make a statement.

    The section on sexually transmitted diseases in the annual report of the chief medical officer for 1981 reflects the advice of his consultant adviser on genito-urinary medicine. All the diseases mentioned in that part of the report are considered to be communicated by sexual contact, although it is generally recognised that some are also transmitted in other ways.

    Still-Born Babies (Burial)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will make a statement on the arrangements for the burial of still-born babies in the nine-month period ended November 1982 on behalf of the Mid-Essex district health authority and the Basildon and Thurrock district health authority.

    Recent disturbing allegations are being investigated by the authorities concerned and the police will be asked to assist if prima facie evidence of possible criminal offences emerges. It would not be right for me or the authorities to comment further until investigations are concluded.

    Washwood Heath Local Office (Staff)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many reserve staff were working at the local office of his Department at Washwood Heath on 31 January, 14 February, 28 February and 14 March, respectively.

    The information requested is as follows:

    Number of regional reserve staff working at the Washwood Heath office
    CBSB
    31 January 19833 LOIIs
    14 February 19833 LOIIs
    28 February 19833 LOIIs
    14 March 19831 LOI1 LOI
    3 LOIIs5 LOIIs
    In addition, the following volunteer staff from other offices were working at Washwood Heath.
    CBSB
    31 January 19831 LOI1 LOII
    14 February 19831 LOI2 LOIIs
    28 February 19833 LOIIs
    14 March 19833 LOIIs

    Mr Peter Large (Letter)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, pursuant to his reply to the right hon. Member for Manchester, Wythenshawe, on 21 March, Official Report, c. 349, why he decided not to place a copy of Mr. Peter Large's letter in the Library; and if he will make a statement.

    It is not my usual practice to publish letters addressed to me unless the writer has indicated his willingness for me to do so. I now have Mr. Large's permission and have placed a copy of his letter dated 6 March 1983 in the Library of the House.

    Defence

    Falkland Islands

    34.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the reply to the hon. Member for West Lothian, Official Report, 6 December, c. 346, whether he is now able to add to the reply to the hon. Member for South Ayrshire (Mr. Foulkes) on 11 November, Official Report, c. 247, on the cost of the Falkland Islands war.

    For the most recent assessment of the extra costs of the Falklands operation and garrison in 1982–83, I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for South Ayrshire (Mr. Foulkes) on 21 February 1983.—[Vol. 37, c. 368–69.]

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for Basildon of 14 February, Official Report, c. 37, when he expects the board of inquiry to report on the incident concerning eight medium dump trucks in Port Stanley harbour on 1 February 1983; when he expects to be in a position to estimate the final cost of the incident to public funds; and if he will make a statement.

    The board of inquiry's proceedings have encountered some delays, and its conclusions are not now expected before the end of this month. Five out of the eight vehicles involved in the incident are now back in use. The probable loss to public funds is estimated to be in the region of £100,000.

    Admirals And Fighting Vessels (Ratio)

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the present ratio between admirals and fighting vessels; and what this ratio was 10 years ago and 20 years ago, respectively.

    Ratios of rear admirals and above to major warships, including submarines, are as follows:

    AdmiralsShipsRatios
    1963691931 : 2·80
    1973601121 : 1·87
    198347971 : 2·06
    These figures exclude those admirals of the fleet who have ceased active employment.

    Ascension Island

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he is satisfied with accommodation and facilities for Nimrod crews at Ascension Island.

    Yes. However, we are improving and extending the facilities for service men generally on Ascension Island.

    National Finance

    Budget

    15.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received since his Budget on the financial position of war widows.

    None as yet, though the extension of the widow's bereavement allowance has been warmly welcomed.

    18.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received as to the distributional effects of the Budget.

    I refer the hon. Member to the answer given earlier today to the hon. Member for Blackburn (Mr. Straw).

    21.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received on the effect of his Budget proposals on the total burden of direct and indirect taxation.

    The proposals my right hon. and learned Friend the Chancellor put forward on 15 March will reduce the overall burden of both direct and indirect taxation.

    22.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received as to the impact of the Budget upon the living standards of the elderly.

    The proposals put forward on 15 March have been generally welcomed. They will reduce the overall burden of taxation. Higher tax allowances will help the lower paid. It is too early to say what the increase in the pension will be, but we expect that our pledge to maintain the value of the pension will be more than fulfilled in this Parliament.

    23.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he expects the policies proposed in his Budget to lead to a reduction in unemployment.

    It is not the practice to publish unemployment forecasts. The Budget should be seen within the framework of the medium term financial strategy, which is designed to lay secure foundations for sustainable growth in output and employment.

    27.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what effect on unemployment will result from his Budget proposals.

    It is not the practice of this or previous Governments to publish estimates of the overall effect of Budgets on unemployment. Such estimates are too dependent on a range of unpredictable factors to be other than misleading. However, the Budget introduced by my right hon. and learned Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursues our economic strategy aimed at fostering a substantial recovery of output and employment.

    29.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many representations he has received since the Budget concerning the number of people paying tax.

    The proposals that my right hon. and learned Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer put forward in his Budget Statement have been generally welcome. There will be 1¼million fewer income taxpayers in 1983–84 than if allowances had remained at their 1982–83 levels.

    30.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received as to the impact of the Budget on investment in manufacturing industry.

    The CBI has welcomed the general encouragement my Budget has given to enterprise, the measures taken to reduce business costs and the specific encouragement given to investment by small firms. The Institute of Directors has also welcomed the Budget, and the help it provides for increased business profits, and more investment and jobs.

    32.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he is satisfied with the general reaction and response to the proposals of his recent Budget.

    Yes. It is recognised that I have been able to propose significant reductions in taxation while maintaining the sound financial disciplines that are necessary to continue reducing inflation and to help sustain economic recovery.

    Taxpayers (Addresses)

    16.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what steps are taken by the Inland Revenue to keep an up to date register of taxpayers' addresses.

    Records of the current addresses of taxpayers with whom they have dealings are kept by individual tax offices.

    International Debt (Imf Committee)

    17.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he is satisfied with progress being made in the interim committee of the International Monetary Fund with regard to the problems of international debt.

    The interim committee at its meeting in Washington on 10–11 February discussed the difficulties many developing countries face in arranging external finance. It stressed the importance of the fund's role both in providing balance of payments assistance to member countries that engage in adjustment programmes and in exercising surveillance over policies. The increase in fund quotas agreed in Washington has equipped the fund with adequate resources to perform this role.

    Inflation

    19.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his latest estimate of the rate of inflation.

    Over the 12 months to February 1983, the retail prices index increased by 5·3 per cent.

    European Community (Budget Contribution)

    20.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether any progress was made at the European Community meeting on 21 and 22 March towards securing a rebate from the 1983 European Community net budget contribution.

    Yes. I refer my hon. Friend to yesterday's statement by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the net contribution of each country to the European Community budget in 1981 and 1982; and how the United Kingdom refunds affect these figures.

    On the basis of the latest Commission estimates, member states' net contributions to (—) and receipts from (+) the Community's allocated budgets for 1981 and 1982, before and after allowing for the effect of United Kingdom refunds, were as follows:

    Million European Currency Units*
    Before refundsAfter refunds
    1981198219811982
    Belgium+276+262+205+202
    Denmark+279+294+242+262
    Germany-1,684-2,085-2,185-2,442
    Greece+173+698+161+682
    France+576+14+139-366
    Ireland+582+721+568+708
    Italy+788+1,586+549+1,373
    Luxembourg+239+248+236+245
    Netherlands+190+302+94+218
    United Kingdom-1,419-2,040-9-883
    * The average £/ecu exchange rates in 1981 and 1982 were as follows:
    1981 1 ecu=£0·5531982 1 ecu=£0·560

    Civil Servants (Taxation And Pay)

    24.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether it is proposed to increase civil servants' pay to compensate them for income tax they will have to pay on perquisites.

    No. The question currently under consideration is whether certain allowances paid to civil servants to cover expenses they incur as part of their jobs should be taxed. The Government's view is that there should be no difference between the public and private sectors in the tax treatment of this sort of allowance. At issue is a sum of some £10 million, rather than the £250 million which has somehow gained currency and which my hon. Friend has quoted in previous exchanges in the House. The Inland Revenue's view is that the present law requires allowances worth some £10 million to be taxed, in which case it is clearly right to consider whether the net sums payable are appropriate to the level of expenses incurred.

    Free Ports

    25.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he has yet completed his consideration of the working party's report on free ports.

    I refer my hon. Friend to my right hon. and learned Friend's Budget Speech—[Vol. 39, c. 153–541—in which he announced that the Government intended to take powers to enable the setting up of a limited number of experimental free ports. The Government are currently preparing criteria by which applicants for free port designation under the experimental scheme will be judged. These criteria will be announced shortly for the guidance of potential operators. In order to ensure that all bids are dealt with on the same basis, applications made prior to this announcement will not be considered, and should, where appropriate, be resubmitted in the light of the criteria.

    Local Enterprise Agencies

    26.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received since the Budget on the need to encourage industry and commerce to make donations to locally based enterprise agencies.

    Public Expenditure

    28.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his latest estimate of the percentage increase in public expenditure between 1978–79 and 1982–83; and how this compares with the percentage increase in the retail price index between February 1979 and February 1983.

    The estimated outturn for the planning total for 1982–83, as published in the Financial Statement and Budget Report is £112·5 billion. This represents an increase of 71·1 per cent. on the corresponding figure for 1978–79. This compares with a percentage increase of 56·6 per cent. in the retail prices index between February 1979 and February 1983.

    International Monetary Fund (Interim Committee)

    31.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he expects the next meeting of the interim committee of the International Monetary Fund to be held.

    The next meeting of the interim committee will be held in Washington on 25 September.

    Divorced And Separated Husbands

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many separated husbands are currently still in receipt of the married man's tax allowance.

    Company Cars (Taxation)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what was the total yield from the taxation of benefit in kind received from private use of a company-financed car in each of the last three years for which the information is available;(2) how many people were taxed for receipt of the benefit in kind of private use of a company-financed car in each of the last three years for which the information is available.

    Estimates of yields from the taxation of the benefit derived from the private use of company cars and the numbers of people who were taxed on the benefit are as follows:

    Yield £ millionNumbers
    1980–8185635,000
    1981–82110700,000
    1982–83140750,000
    Yields are estimated for a full year at the levels of income, personal allowances, thresholds and scale charges of the respective year. Estimates are subject to a fairly wide margin of error and figures for 1981–82 and 1982–83 are provisional.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many people paid no tax for the benefit in kind which they enjoy from private use of a company-financed car in each of the last three years for which the information is available, because their annual income was less than the minimum above which tax liability commences.

    The number of people who paid no tax on the benefit derived from the private use of company cars for each of the last three years is not precisely known. However, it is thought to be of the order of 850,000.

    Value Added Tax

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list (a) the goods and services initially exempt from value added tax which are now within the scope of the tax and (b) the goods and services initially within the scope of value-added tax which are now exempt.

    Some of the changes which have been made to the VAT exemption schedule since 1 April 1973 simply clarify or make minor technical amendments to existing exemptions, or provide for adjustments between exemption and zero rating. The main changes between exemption and the standard rating of supplies are as follows:

    (a) Supplies initially exempt but now chargeable at the standard rate of VAT.

    • The provision of holiday accommodation in a houseboat.
    • The granting of housing, mooring and storage facilities for aircraft or ships.
    • The provision of sites or space at exhibitions or similar events.
    • The provision of facilities for the playing of a gaming machine.
    • The supply of gold coins which are legal tender in the place of issue.

    (b) Supplies initially chargeable at the standard rate of VAT but now exempt

    • The provision of reinsurance by authorised insurers.
    • The provision of insurance and reinsurance by the Export Credit Guarantee Department.
    • The handling of insurance claims by authorised insurance brokers and agents.
    • Supplies of instalment credit finance under certain hire purchase, conditional sale or credit sale agreements.
    • Research by a school, university or non-profit making body.
    • Professional training by a non-profit making body.
    • Private tuition in subjects normally taught in a school or university.
    • Provision by an association of youth clubs of the facilities available to its members.
    • The provision of deputies for doctors.
    • Medical services supplied by a person who is not a registered practitioner where the services are performed or directly supervised by a person who is so registered.

    In addition, the following groups of items which were regarded as outside the scope of the tax in 1973 are now categorised as exempt supplies:

    • Supplies of services to their members by trade unions and certain professional bodies.
    • Grants of the right to enter certain sporting and physical recreational competitions.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if the European Commission has instigated infraction proceedings against Luxembourg in respect of the continued exemption of zero rating for value added tax on gold coins.

    Advance Petroleum Revenue Tax

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether the deemed market price for advanced petroleum revenue tax is a variant of the recommended reference price for North sea crudes or of spot market prices.

    The same valuation rules apply for advance petroleum revenue tax as apply for petroleum revenue tax. For oil sold at arm's length tax is based on the actual sale proceeds. Oil disposed of other than at arm's length or appropriated for the producer's own use is valued at market value—that is, the price at which the oil could have been sold to a willing buyer at that time in a sale at arm's length. The valuation is based on all relevant evidence of prices charged in comparable and contemporary transactions between parties at arm's length.

    Building Society Directors

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will introduce legislation to give additional information in respect of financial interests of building society directors in relation to AR 11 documents.

    Section 89 of the Building Societies Act 1962 already requires a society to show in its annual return details of loans made in the year in question in which a director, manager or secretary of the society has a significant interest. The annual return also shows the business occupations and other directorships held by the directors and those officers.The questions of whether there should be further disclosure of loans in which directors have an interest or of the financial interests of directors, either publicly or in a confidenial return to the registry, are matters which will be considered when building societies legislation is next being prepared.

    Britannia Building Society

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) whether the Registrar of Friendly Societies is studying advances from other building societies to the Bernard Clarke group of companies in connection with the inquiry into the Britannia building society;(2) whether, when the inquiry into the connection between the Britannia building society and the Bernard Clarke group of companies is completed, he will place a copy in the Library;(3) whether the Registrar of Friendly Societies will be consulting counsel in relation to the inquiry into the Britannia building society and the Bernard Clarke group of companies;(4) what is the nature of the inquiry which is being held into the relationship between the Britannia building society and the Bernard Clarke group of companies; and when he expects it to be completed;(5) on what date the inquiry is expected to commence in respect of the Britannia building society and the Bernard Clarke group of companies;(6) what specialist staff will be used, particularly in accounting disciplines, in connection with the inquiry into the Britannia building society and the Bernard Clarke group of companies.

    It would be contrary to the public interest to give information about the monitoring by the registry of particular societies except where the Chief Registrar has used his statutory powers to restrict the operations of a society, or following the appointment of inspectors.

    Re-Insurance Premiums (Taxation)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he expects to answer the two questions from the hon. Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr on taxation of reinsurance premiums of 9 February, Official Report, c. 365 following the letter sent to him on 10 February by the hon. Member as requested.

    I am sorry that the hon. Gentleman has not yet had a reply, but I hope to be in a position to send him one very shortly.

    Budget (Unemployment)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received since the Budget about the effect of his proposals on the level of unemployment.

    I refer the hon. Member to the oral answer I gave to the hon. Member for Bothwell (Mr. Hamilton) earlier today.

    Leith (Free Port Status)

    (Leith) asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received supporting free port status for Leith.

    Taxation

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the answer of 15 March, Official Report, c. 131–32, if he will disaggregate the gains or losses made by average taxpayers in each of the income categories quoted in each of the Budgets 1979 to 1983, inclusive.

    Personal Disposable Income

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the annual change in real personal disposable income for (a) the unemployed and (b) those still in work, since 1975.

    Social Security

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if, in the light of decisions announced in his Budget statement, he will revise the figure of £180 million estimated savings in the social security budget in the part-year 1983–84, given in his autumn economic statement, paragraph 2.25.

    Tax Avoidance

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will discuss with the Finance Ministers of the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man the elimination of the avoidance of United Kingdom taxes by United Kingdom nationals abusing the laws of the islands.