Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 42: debated on Thursday 12 May 1983

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Thursday 12 May 1983

Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

Farm Borrowings

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food by how much farm borrowings have increased in the past year.

The average level of hank advances outstanding to United Kingdom agriculture increased in 1982 by £618 million or 18 per cent. compared with 1981. In addition, outstanding loans by the Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and similar bodies, together with estimated instalment credit, increased between the two years by £30 million or 5 per cent., giving an increase of 17 per cent. in borrowings from these sources taken together. The continuing increase in bank advances, though at a slower percentage rate than in recent years, reflects, first, the recovery in the industry's new investment in fixed assets, secondly, the growth in its working capital requirements, and thirdly, the increased share supplied by the banks of the total credit needs of agriculture. The banks have recently increased their long-term lending and mortgage lending to agriculture. But the statistics of farm borrowings have to be kept in perspective. Survey results have shown that the industry's external liabilities bear the same relationship to the value of its total assets now as they did in the mid-1970s.

Butter

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the value to the British consumer of butter subsidies granted under the various Community schemes in 1981 and 1982.

In 1982 the total value of Community subsidies and price and levy reductions on butter supplies in the United Kingdom was £101 million. The comparable figure for 1981 was £85 million.

Wales

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many times he has paid official visits to Wales since May 1979; and if he will make a statement.

The Secretary of State for Wales is of course responsible for agriculture in Wales, and throughout the last four years he and I have had close liaison on all matters concerned with Welsh agriculture. I have frequently met Welsh farm leaders and held regular meetings with the chairman of the Agricultural Advisory Panel for Wales. In 1982 I visited dairies in the Llandyrnog area and I am currently considering an invitation to visit the Pembrokeshire branch of the National Farmers Union.

Self-Sufficiency (Temperate Foodstuffs)

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list in the Official Report the present extent of United Kingdom self-sufficiency in the production of all major temperate foodstuffs; and how it compares with similar figures 10 years previously.

The information requested is given in the following table. Further details are contained in tables 8 to 18 of the Annual Review of Agriculture 1983 —Cmnd. 8804.

United Kingdom production as a percentage of total new supplies for major agricultural products
Average of 1971–731982 (forecast)
Wheat53106
Barley94128
Potatoes9585
Beef and Veal7990
Mutton and Lamb4464
Pork97101
Bacon and Ham4441
Butter2064
Cheese5571
Eggs98100

Source: Annual Review of Agriculture 1983 (Cmnd. 8804).

Cmnd. 8804 also includes information—table 1 — about the aggregate value of home produced food as a percentage of all indigenous type food consumed in the United Kingdom: this measure of self sufficiency in food increased from 62 per cent. in 1971–73 to 76 per cent. in 1981–82.

Home Department

Vietnamese Refugees

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether the alleged refugees from Vietnam who have landed in Hong Kong will in due course be able to claim entry into the United Kingdom as Hong Kong citizens.

The dependencies do not have separate citizenships. The acquisition of British dependent: territories citizenship in a dependency is a matter for the authorities of that country. Entry to the United Kingdom for those subject to control under the Immigration Act: 1971 is governed by the published immigration rules—House of Commons Paper 169.

Ira (Demonstration)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will call for a report from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis on the circumstances of the demonstration by supporters of the Provisional Irish Republican Army in London on Saturday 7 May.

We understand from the Commissioner that on the afternoon of Saturday 7 May approximately 1,200 supporters of the "Britain Out of Ireland Movement" marched from Hyde park via Whitehall to Jubilee gardens, where several speakers addressed the crowd. Five arrests were made for minor offences by protesters, but there were no reports of violent behaviour or damage to property.

Iran And Iraq Citizens

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will refuse permission to enter the United Kingdom to any Iranian or Iraqi whom he understands to be a member of their countries' armed forces and whose purpose in entering the United Kingdom is to undergo training which will be of military use.

Any application to enter the United Kingdom from a person who is subject to immigration control is considered in accordance with the immigration rules.

Matthew Paul

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how long Matthew Paul had been in custody when he was found hanged on Friday 6 May in Leman street police station; whether he had been charged; whether charges were contemplated; and, if so, what those charges were.

We understand from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis that Matthew Paul was arrested at 2.5 am on 5 May in connection with a murder investigation. Three other persons were arrested in relation to the same matter later that day. Matthew Paul was found dead in his cell at 1.50 pm the following day, 6 May. He had not been charged, but the three others were charged with murder on 7 May.

Animals (Experiments)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will publish the Government's proposals for new legislation on scientific procedures on living animals; and if he will make a statement.

In a White Paper published today I propose new legislation to control scientific experiments on living animals. This legislation, which will be introduced as soon as parliamentary time permits, will repeal the Cruelty to Animals Act 1876 and bring in completely new controls.I believe that the measures proposed will greatly strengthen protection for animals without unduly prejudicing the undoubted benefits to humanity of the necessary minimum of animal procedures.The main changes proposed will be as follows.Controls are to be imposed on a wider range of procedures involving animals in laboratories. For the first time suppliers of animals for use in laboratories will have to be registered. Animals commonly used for experimentation will have to be obtained from these registered suppliers. All aspects of the regulation of accommodation and care of animals in laboratories will be put on a statutory basis.A new system of licensing for all projects is proposed to ensure that suffering is kept to an irreducible minimum, and that reliable alternative methods not involving animals are used whenever practicable. Particularly stringent controls will apply to all applications for project licences to test cosmetics on animals.A new statutory committee, the Animals Procedures Committee, is to be established, and will have wide powers to advise on any matters which I refer to it as giving rise to special concern. For example, all applications to test cosmetics on animals will be referred to this committee.The Home Office Inspectorate will be strengthened and will have new and enhanced duties in operating the new controls.The White Paper is based on a wide range of representations I have received, especially on the recommendations of my Advisory Committee on Animal Experiments, and on the draft Council of Europe convention for the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. I am proposing stricter controls than the minimum the convention would permit, particularly in refusing to allow any exception to the prohibition on the infliction upon animals of pain which is both severe and enduring.

Energy

Coal And Nuclear Power Stations

asked the Secretary of State for Energy how much (a) coal fuel costs and (b) nuclear fuel costs have risen since 1973.

I am advised by the CEGB that coal and nuclear fuel cycle costs in pence per unit of output from its coal and nuclear power stations for 1973–74 were as follows:

Coal (p/kwh)Nuclear (plkwh )
0·37460·1165
The relative costs for nuclear fuel in 1981–82 are not directly comparable because of accounting changes. These are set out in the notes, and after incorporating the changes the figures for 1981–82 are as follows:

Coal (p/kwh)Nuclear (p/kwh)
1·83661·4471
The nuclear fuel costs largely reflect those for Magnox stations as these account for the bulk of nuclear generation. They do not therefore reflect the more efficient fuel use in the AGR and the considerably lower fuel costs for the AGR as against the most recent coal stations. The most recently commissioned coal and nuclear stations show costs as follows:

Coal (plkwh) Drax (first half)Nuclear (p/kwh) Hinkley Point B
1981–821·590·77

Notes:

1. For nuclear fuel the following changes in accounting practice took place:

(a) From 1975–76—Charges have been made in the accounts for future long term storage of waste products.

(b) From 1975–76—Charges have been made in the accounts for the future reprocessing of fuel remaining in reactors at station shutdown.

(c) From 1976–77—The annual charge which writes off the cost of the initial nuclear fuel was reallocated from depreciation to fuel costs.

(d) From 1980–81—the CEGB adopted current cost accounting and accordingly fuel costs were based on current replacement rather than average historic costs.

2. Coal costs include the cost of coal, coal transport, handling and ash disposal. Nuclear costs include fuel burnt (the cost of ore and manufacture, treatment of waste products and a proportionate charge for initial fuel load).

Magnox Reactors

asked the Secretary of State for Energy what has been the mass of spent fuel discharged from each Magnox reactor of the Central Electricity Generating Board and the South of Scotland Electricity Board for each year of operation and for each station.

In my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Bedford (Mr. Skeet) on 9 March 1983, I stated that the quantity and isotopic composition of the plutonium exported to the United States under the barter arrangements between 1959 and 1970 could not be

te U
YearBradwellBerkeleyHinkley point ATrawsfynyddDungeness ASizewellOldburyWylfaTotal
1971–7268104136514513512814672
1972–73871109811901469260694
1973–7467115160228102134143981,047
1974–7581891651351461331031801,032
1975–768110012710212813610985868
1976–777410413672123129101184923
1977–7884381641306111512591809
1978–796161113986510277113690
1979–8044791171123181115192771
1980–8133714447130108256725
1981–82610198186691209589
1982–835222112129878191227801
7088591,4501,2279961,3891,2831,7099,621

Notes:

(i) Figures for individual reactors are not available.

(ii) The figures do not include the reactors of the SSEB which are the responsibility of the Secretary of Stale for Scotland.

asked the Secretary of State for Energy what has been the net feed of uranium into each Magnox reactor of the Central Electricity Generating Board and the South of Scotland Electricity Board for each year of operation and for each station.

It is the practice with Magnox refuelling to replace the fuel discharged with an equal quantity of new fuel. In general, therefore, there is no net feed of uranium to the reactor beyond the initial charges of fuel which were as follows:

te U
Bradwell478·8
Berkeley461·4
Hinkley Point A706·0
Trawsfynydd587·0
Dungeness A613·5
Sizewell641·0
Oldbury583·8
Wylfa1,191·8
TOTAL5,263·3
There are two exceptions to this situation (i) in one or two instances modification of the fuel element design has given rise to a small net input of uranium during the period of changeover and (ii) small quantities of uranium—about 1 per cent.—are either fissioned or converted to plutonium during irradiation in the reactor.

Notes:

  • (i) Figures for individual reactors are not available.
  • (ii) The figures do not include the reactors of the SSEB which are the responsibility of the Secretary of State for Scotland.
  • revealed for national security reasons in view of the relationship of this information to the quantity of haghly enriched uranium received by the United Kingdom for defence purposes. The information now requested by the hon. Member for the years up to 1970–71, taken together with that provided in answer to his question of 1 April 1982, would enable a calculation to be made of the quantity of plutonium exported to the United States under the barter arrangements. For that reason, it would not be in the national interest to disclose information for the years up to and including 1970–71. The mass of spent fuel discharged from each CEGB Magnox station for each year of operation from 1971–72 onwards is as follows:

    Standing Charges

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy, in view of the decision of the South Eastern electricity board not to implement the Government's preferred rebate scheme for low consumers of electricity, if he will issue a directive to the industry which will ensure comparable treatment to all users of electricity, irrespective of their home area.

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy, pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for St. Pancras, North (Mr. Stallard) on 11 April, Official Report, c. 324, whether the South Eastern electricity board is among those which have not adopted his proposal that standing charges should be limited to a maximum of half of any bill.

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy, pursuant to the reply to the hon. Member for St. Pancras, North (Mr. Stallard) on 11 April, Official Report, c. 324, whether the South Eastern electricity board is among those that have not adopted his proposal that standing charges should be limited to a maximum of half of any bill; which the other boards are; and whether, in the interests of comparability throughout the United Kingdom, he will consider using his powers of direction in this matter.

    My right hon. Friend's proposal was that standing charges should be limited to a maximum of half of a domestic consumer's bill. The South Eastern electricity board has adopted a different approach, giving less relief from standing charges. I understand also that the North Eastern electricity board is not applying the rebate scheme to prepayment customers. I regret that these boards have not adopted my right hon. Friend's proposal in full.

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy, further to his answer to the hon. Member for St. Pancras North on 11 April, Official Report, c. 324–5, which consumer representatives were consulted about standing charges.

    Discussions were held with the chairman of the Electricity Consumers Council and the National Gas Consumers Council.In addition, we took account of the views on various aspects of standing charges put to us on various occasions by a large number of other organisations. I refer the hon. Member to the reply from my hon. Friend the Member for Putney (Mr. Mellor) to the hon. Member for Liverpool, Scotland Exchange (Mr. Parry) dated 19 November, 1982 —[Vol. 32, c.

    317–18.]

    North Sea Oil

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy what was the price of a barrel of North sea oil in May 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982; and what is the present price.

    The price of Brent blend, the current United Kingdom reference crude, sold under term contracts was as follows:

    US $ f.o.b.
    May 197918·30
    May 198034·25
    Before 20 May 198136·25
    From 20 May 198139·25
    May 198236·60
    May 198330·00

    Geothermal Energy Experiments

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy when he will announce a decision regarding the future of the geothermal energy experiments in Cornwall.

    The current three-year phase of geothermal energy experiments in Cornwall will not be completed until the end of September. Proposals for further work to be carried out by the Camborne school of mines over the next three years are under active consideration. An announcement will be made as soon as possible.

    British Nuclear Fuels Ltd (Chapelcross Site)

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy for what purpose British Nuclear Fuels Ltd. has recently fenced in additional land at its Chapelcross site and applied for a new site licence from the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate.

    The recent fencing of land already in BNFL ownership at Chapelcross was for managerial purposes related to security and the organisation of the site; in particular, the opportunity has been taken to bring part of an effluent discharge pipeline within the fenced area. It is not connected with the site licence. The issue of a new site licence followed a review initiated by the Health and Safety Executive into inspection and control arrangements which is part of normal NII procedure for the updating of licences.

    Alternative Energy Sources

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy what financial or other encouragement is provided for research into alternative sources of power such as that from wind and waves.

    I refer my hon. Friend to the Official Report for 9 May 1983, c. 621–22, giving details of the £13 million to £14 million my Department expects to spend in 1983–84 on research and development into new and renewable energy sources. In the period 1979–80 to 1982–83 my Department spent £50 million in this area. In addition to this financial support, my Department encourages the use of renewable energy sources by making available information on our research, in the form of reports and journal articles, to the extent that commercial confidentiality allows.

    Western Approaches And Cornwall (Operations)

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will list the offshore and onshore investigative and research operations in all forms of energy and activity affecting the Western Approaches and Cornwall as notified to his Department since May 1979.

    I am having the information gathered and I shall write to my hon. Friend as soon as possible.

    National Coal Board (Social Grants)

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy what procedures have been adopted for the payment of social grants to the National Coal Board following the improvements in redundancy terms effective from 11 March 1981.

    I indicated during the Committee stage of the Coal Industry Bill — 11 February 1982, Official Report, c. 49–51—that the National Coal Board has negotiated with the mining unions very substantial improvements in the benefits payable under the industry's pension schemes to or in respect of persons becoming eligible for the RMPS on or after 11 March 1981, and that the Government would agree with the board the procedures for reimbursing the cost of paying these early and enhanced pensions. I made it clear in bringing the 1982 Bill before the House that social grant payments are expected to continue and that suitable statutory powers will be sought to permit this.I can now report that the Government have agreed with the board a set of ground rules for determining the amount of the board's cost of paying the pensions that would normally be reimbursed. It provides for the cost to the appropriate pension scheme associated with the additional benefits payable to, or in respect of, a new entrant to the RMPS, estimated on an actuarial basis, to be paid by the Government in instalments, starting after the end of the year in which the redundancy took place. This arrangement means that the cost of each new redundant person will be met in 10 annual instalments and thus there will be continuing payments of social grants in respect of these cases.Payments to the staff superannuation scheme in respect of non-industrial staff, half the cost of which the Government reimburses under section 6 of the Coal Industry Act 1977 in cases where redundancy arises in relation to pit closures, are being reorganised in the same way, by 10 annual instalments with continuing payment of grants.

    International Energy Agency (Meeting)

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will make a statement about the meeting of the governing board of the International Energy Agency at ministerial level which he attended in Paris on 8 May.

    The governing board of the International Energy Agency—IEA—met at ministerial level in Paris on Sunday 8 May under the chairmanship of Mr. William Birch of New Zealand. I represented the United Kingdom. Copies of the communiqué are available in the Libraries of both Houses.Ministers considered the current position in the world oil market. They agreed that the easing of the oil market was a welcome development for the world economy. However, they expressed concern over the longer term possibility of renewed instability in energy and oil markets, with adverse effects on the world economy. They therefore reaffirmed their intention to pursue policies of oil substitution, energy conservation and energy research and development. The IEA will monitor developments in the oil market closely.Ministers also considered energy requirements and security for the next two decades. They recognised the continued likelihood of heavy reliance on imported energy, particularly oil but also gas, and agreed on the need for balanced policies including the use of gas on an acceptably secure basis. OECD Ministers heard a report on these discussions by the chairman of the IEA meeting the following day.

    Severn Barrage

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy what representations have been made to him following the publication of the Severn barrage committee's report in July 1981; and if he will make a statement.

    Many comments were received on the report from local authorities, organisations and individuals. Most of these supported the committee's recommendation of further studies to establish the viability of a barrage from Brean Down to Lavernock Point and to look at the wider implications. I have given careful consideration to all the views expressed.I have also received detailed proposals for a jointly funded study from the Severn tidal power group. This group comprises Sir Robert McAlpine and Sons, GEC Power Engineering, Taylor Woodrow Construction, Northern Engineering Industries and Balfour Beatty. The study would be directed towards the assessment of the technical and financial viability of a barrage built and operated by the private sector.I have decided that this is the right way to proceed. Subject to agreement on the terms and conditions of contract, matching funds will be provided for this study from my Department's non-nuclear R and D budget, up to a total of £250,000 over two years. This support will be given on the understanding that no Government commitment will exist after the two-year study is complete.The initiative taken by the STPG in this matter is most welcome. The Severn barrage could make a significant contribution to our future electricity needs, and offer a valuable complement to coal-fired and nuclear power stations.Private sector involvement at this early stage will ensure that the commercial implications of the project are realistically evaluated.Details of the proposed study will be worked out over the next few months. Local Authorities and other interested parties will be consulted.

    Education And Science

    Her Majesty's Inspectors Of Schools (Reports)

    asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if, pursuant to his answer of 26 April , Official Report, c. 721–2, he can yet say when the report of Her Majesty's Inspectors of Schools will be published.

    Her Majesty's Inspectorate has not yet completed its report on the effects of local authorities' expenditure policies on education in England in 1982. As I stated on 26 April, it was my intention, had the election not intervened, to publish the report.

    Mandatory Awards

    asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he has any plans to extend mandatory awards to students on higher national diploma three-year sandwich courses, so that the middle year training element is covered by a mandatory award; and if he will make a statement.

    asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will make a statement about the rate of mandatory awards for the academic year 1983–84.

    I announced on 8 November 1982 —[Vol. 31, c. 42]—that the main rates of grant would be increased by 4 per cent. for the academic year 1983–84 and the parental contribution scale would be adjusted upwards by 8 per cent. in line with earnings over the past year. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Scotland and I have therefore agree that the main rates of grant for 1983–84 should be increased as follows:

    For students:
  • (i) living away from home and attending an establishment in London: from £1,900 to £1,975;
  • (ii) living away from home and attending an establishment outside London: from £1,595 to £1,660;
  • (iii) living in the parental home: from £1,225 to £1,272.
  • The minimum maintenance payment will remain at the same level as for 1982–83, £410.There will be no other changes with significant financial implications in the awards regulations for 1983–84. Further consideration will be given to the method of reimbursement of students' travel costs, which will remain unchanged for 1983–84.

    Capital Transfer Tax (Objects In Lieu)

    asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he will seek powers to transfer the responsibility from his Department to the Museums and Galleries Commission for administering acceptances of heritage objects in satisfaction of capital transfer tax; and whether he will make a statement.

    Any transfer of ministerial responsibilities under the National Heritage Act 1980 would require legislation in a future Parliament. Departmental arrangements for administering those responsibilities are always open to review and the hon. Member's suggestion could be considered in the next Parliament.

    Wales

    A487 (Penygroes)

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales what representations he has had on the parking problem on the A487 road at Penygroes; and if he will make a statement.

    The Gwynedd county council, which maintains the trunk road through Penygroes as my right hon. Friend's agents, has reported that it has received a few representations, including one from the hon. Member, favouring relaxation of the existing parking restrictions. A substantial car park has been provided recently and there is no need to relax the restrictions.

    Hip Joint Replacement

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is the average waiting time for a hip joint replacement operation at each of the main centres in Wales where this operation is carried out; how many such operations were carried out at each centre during each of the past five years; and how many patients are on the waiting list of each consultant who carries out this particular operation in Wales.

    Free School Meals

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many students are currently (a) entitled to free school meals and (b) receiving free school meals in (i) mid-Glamorgan and (ii) Wales.

    Information on the number of pupils entitled to free school meals is not available centrally. The number of pupils in maintained schools in mid-Glamorgan who received a free school meal on 24 September 1982, the latest census date, was 16,605. The corresponding figure for all maintained schools in Wales is 76,276.

    Price Review Negotiations

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many times since May 1979 Ministers from his Department have attended European Community price review negotiations; and if he will make a statement.

    None. My Department participates at ministerial and official level in the formulation of the United Kingdom negotiating stance. The delegation led by my right hon. Friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food negotiates on behalf of all the United Kingdom Agriculture Departments.

    Distalgesic

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will institute an inquiry into the effects of the drug Distalgesic on patients in Wales.

    No. The Committee on Safety of Medicines is currently reviewing the safety of distalgesic and I have no doubt will recommend any action it considers necessary.

    Council House Sales (Cardiff)

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many (a) council houses, and (b) flats were sold in the Cardiff district to sitting tenants in each of the last five years.

    The numbers of dwellings sold to sitting tenants in each of the last five years were as follows:

    Number
    1978131
    1979186
    198016
    1981298
    19821,420
    Separate figures for houses and flats are not available for the years 1978 to 1980. In 1981 and 1982 no flats were sold.

    Doctors

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many general practitioners were in practice in Wales in 1979 and at the latest date.

    At 1 October 1979, the number of unrestricted principals was 1,339: the corresponding figure in 1982 was 1,431.

    Labour Statistics

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in each of the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the constituency of Brecon and Radnor.

    In best fit terms the information is as follows:

    May 1979March 1983
    Travel-to-work areaRegistrants unemployedper cent.per Claimantsper cent.
    Brecon3414·86228·7
    Llandrindod Wells4065·497212·9

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories: (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the constituency of Brecon and Radnor.

    Travel-to-work area

    Up to 26 weeks

    Over 26 and up to 52 weeks

    Over 52 and up to 104 weeks

    Over 104 and up to 156 weeks

    156 weeks and over

    April 1979 (Registrants Unemployed)

    Brecon20054431230
    Llandrindod Wells21899512943

    January 1983 (Claimants Unemployed)

    Brecon331116974042
    Llandrindod Wells4891611717450

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many (a) school leavers, (b) people under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 54 years and (e) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January

    TTWASchool LeaversUnder 2525 to 44 Years45 to 54 Years55 Years and Over
    April 1979 (Registrants Unemployed)
    Brecon7971293875
    Llandrindod Wells210015261127
    January 1983 (Claimants Unemployed)
    Brecon1322423164107
    Llandrindod Wells2531335489189

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many (a) school leavers, (b) people aged under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 54 years and (e) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983,

    TTWASchool LeaversUnder 2525 to 44 Years45 to 54 Years55 Years and Over
    April 1979 (Registrants Unemployed)
    Cardiff4025,2735,4961,8402,253
    January 1983 (Claimants Unemployed)
    Cardiff1,06611,27210,4403,0993,750

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies (a) Ynys Môn and (b) Clwyd South West, respectively.

    In best fit terms the information is as follows:

    May 1979March 1983
    TTWARegistrants Unemployedper cent.Claimants Unemployedper cent.
    (a)
    Holyhead2,30912·04,37222·7
    (b)
    April 1979 (Registrants Unemployed)
    TTWASchool leaversUnder 2525 to 44 years45 to 54 years55 years and over
    (i) Holyhead33757852325422
    (ii) Denbigh11714257104
    Llangollen721455997
    Wrexham981,5141,720550862

    1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the constituency of Brecon and Radnor.

    In best fit terms the information is as follows:respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the parliamentary constituency of Cardiff, Central.

    In best fit terms the information is as follows:

    May 1979March 1983
    TTWARegistrants Unemployedper cent.Claimants Unemployedper cent.
    Denbigh3955·872910·6
    Llangollen3617·577216·1
    Wrexham4,61210·28,44818·7

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many (a) school leavers, (b) people aged under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 54 years and (e) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies: (i) Ynys Môn and (ii) Clwyd South West.

    TTWA

    School leavers

    Under 25

    25 to 44 years

    45 to 54 years

    55 years and over

    January 1983 (Claimants Unemployed)
    (i) Holyhead1691,6881,773575511
    (ii) Denbigh3725823791144
    Llangollen26215280103127
    Wrexham3723,2953,1079241,331

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories: (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks, and (e)

    April 1979 (Registrants Unemployed)
    TTWAUp to 26 weeksOver 26 weeks and up to 52 weeksOver 52 and up to 104 weeksOver 104 and up to 156 weeks156 weeks and over
    (i) Holyhead971491413164317
    (ii) Denbigh22277512644
    Llangollen16474593145
    Wrexham2,030990765305556
    January 1983 (Claimants Unemployed)
    (i) Holyhead2,053794873417410
    (ii) Denbigh3621041376265
    Llangollen3541441245251
    Wrexham3,5631,4591,5711,213851

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the parliamentary constituency of Cardiff, Central.

    In best fit terms the information is as follows:

    May 1979March 1983
    Travel-to-workRegistrants unemployedClaimants unemployed
    areaNumberper cent.Numberper cent.
    Cardiff14,5877·327,89413·9
    Travel-to-work areaUp to 26 weeksOver 26 and up to 52 weeksOver 52 and up to 104 weeksOver 104 and up to 156 weeks156 weeks and over
    April 1979 (registrants unemployed)
    Cardiff7,1803,7432,193825921
    January 1983 (claimants unemployed)
    Cardiff12,6225,6035,3152,7352,286

    Welsh Development Agency

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will state up to the latest convenient date the number of factories completed by the Welsh Development Agency, the number now under construction and the number of those constructed which have been allocated.

    At the end of March 1983 the Welsh Development Agency had completed 1,093 advance factories, bespoke units and extensions, and another 132 were under construction. Of the total number completed, 777 have been allocated.

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will state the total cost of all factories which

    over 156 weeks, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies: (i) Ynys Môn and (ii) Clwyd South West.

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the parliamentary constituency of Cardiff, Central.

    In best fit terms the information is as follows:have been built in Wales, up to the latest convenient date, by the Welsh Development Agency; and what will be the cost of those factories to be built by the agency and now under construction.

    Between January 1976 and March 1983 the Welsh Development Agency spent £183 million on factory construction. Factories under construction or planned will cost about £20 million.

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will make a statement about the future plans of the Welsh Development Agency.

    I have reviewed in detail the achievements and future intentions of the agency with its chairman and board members. The agency intends to diversify its activities so as to make Wales more attractive as a location for inward investment and high technology development. I have already announced the setting up of WINvest: Wales Investment Location—to unify and develop arrangements for attracting inward investment. I am also considering the establishment of a technology centre, perhaps named WlNtech to provide a point of focus for such development, acting in collaboration with other organisations already in the field. A fuller statement on these matters has been placed in the Library of the House.

    Manufacturing Output

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales what has been the fall in manufacturing output in Wales since May 1979.

    As measured by the Welsh index of industrial production, manufacturing output in Wales is estimated to have fallen by 21 per cent. between the second quarter of 1979 and the last quarter of 1982.

    Monuments

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales, pursuant to his reply of 15 June 1982 to the hon. Member for Brecon and Radnor, Official Report, c. 229, whether he has secured progress in making monuments in his care more attractive to visitors.

    Last autumn I commissioned a consultant, John Brown Tourism Marketing and Development Services, to carry out a study of the presentation and promotion of the ancient monuments in my care with a view to making them more attractive to visitors. I recently received the consultant's report. It is detailed and wide ranging; stimulating and constructive. It recommends a completely new approach to the presentation of monuments in Wales and makes over 100 detailed recommendations intended to make the monuments more enjoyable, more enlightening and more profitable, without detracting from their historic and cultural value. It points the way to the long term future of ancient monuments in Wales.Certain of the detailed recommendations can and will be implemented without delay. I accept in principle the new approach which the report suggests. My Department is considering ways of implementing this approach. It could involve a variety of arrangements bringing in local authorities, other public bodies, as well as private organisations and individuals. In Wales the ancient monuments can be a real asset to tourism. It is vital to ensure that this asset is used to the best advantage.Copies of the report are being placed in the Library.

    Special Heating Allowance

    asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many persons in (a) mid-Glamorgan and (b) Wales are currently in receipt of a special heating allowance.

    I have been asked to reply.The numbers of cases in action in the Department's offices situated in Mid Glamorgan and in Wales on 15 May 1979 and on 15 February 1983 were as follows:

    (Thousands)

    15 May 1979

    15 February 1983

    Mid Glamorgan35·352·7
    Wales180·6264·2

    Source: 100 per cent. count of cases in action.

    The most recent figures on heating additions payable with supplementary benefit in those offices come from the December 1982 annual statistical inquiry. They are as follows:

    Number

    Mid Glamorgan32,000
    Wales153,000

    Source: Annual statistical inquiry December 1982 (provisional figures).

    Industry

    North East Region

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he will provide an analysis under appropriate headings of the £1·7 billion of aid provided to the north east by the Government referred to on 31 March, Official Report, c. 487.

    The figure was made up of industrial and other assistance to the northern region under national and regional schemes during the period May 1979 to March 1983 amounting to some £705 million, and public expenditure in the region on infrastructure provision directly relating to industrial development estimated at £1,000 million.The £705 million is made up as follows:

    £ million
    Regional Development Grants469
    Urban Programme102·5
    Regional Selective Assistance (S7)*51
    National Selective Assistance (S8)*†2·5
    English Industrial Estates Corporation47
    Temporary Short Time Working Compensation Scheme32
    Support for Innovation1
    705
    * Value of offers.
    † Excluding expenditure in Cumbria.

    Call Boxes

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will give (a) the number of public call boxes for each of the last 10 years for which figures are available and (b) the loss to British Telecom attributable to maintaining them for each year.

    The information for the years up to 31 March 1982 has been published in the British Telecom publication "Statistics 1982" and in its annual reports and accounts for the various years. The information for 31 March 1983 is not yet available.

    South Africa (Investment)

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry what is his estimate of the level of South African investment in United Kingdom industry.

    The latest available information on the level of South African direct investment in the United Kingdom relates to the position at the end of 1978. This is published in table 14 of "Business Monitor MA4, 1978 Supplement, Census of Overseas Assets 1978", a copy of which is in the Library. The figure is £333·4 million, excluding oil, banking, and insurance.

    Telecommunication Equipment

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will seek to expedite the production by the British Standards Institution of its specification for telecommunications equipment; and if he will make a statement.

    I keep under constant review the possibilities for expediting the drafting of standards for telecommunications apparatus. Some slippage has occurred because of the complexity of the task and because of the need to obtain consensus. However, seven standards are complete, a number are close to completion and the programme as a whole as targeted by the 1981 Act is substantially on course.

    Industrial Output

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry what changes have taken place in industrial output over the last year in the United Kingdom; and how such changes compare with those in other leading European countries.

    NLF and PDC and other loansSubsidies under section 7 and 8 etc.Construction grants under section 11 etc.Shipbuilding redundancy payments
    1977–7827·40·3
    1978–79 NLF*5510·60·34·7
    1979–80 NLF*/PDC†18131·20·115·5
    1980–8111039·90·120·1
    1981–8210745·90·314·4
    1982–837643·816·0
    Total 1979–80 to 1982–83‡474160·80·566·0
    * National loans fund advanced on an interim basis.
    † Net. All outstanding NLF loans were repaid in full with interest on 21 December 1979 and were replaced by PDC.
    ‡ Does not include payments made in 1983–84.

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry what provision the Government are making to help British Shipbuilders obtain orders in current market conditions.

    We already provide considerable assistance. Since early 1979 British Shipbuilders has received £700 million of taxpayers' money to help meet its losses, and to restructure. This includes support through the intervention fund, which enables BS to quote prices which do not cover its costs. Support is also given through the home shipbuilding credit scheme, which encourages United Kingdom owners to place their orders in United Kingdom yards.The Government are currently considering detailed proposals from the chairman of BS for extra help in the light of the deterioration of the market. These will need to be considered against the background of a full business plan for the future of the corporation, which BS is now preparing, and in the light of our international obligations. I have told Sir Robert Atkinson that in the meantime the

    Between the three months ended February 1982 and the three months ended February 1983, industrial production in the United Kingdom rose by two per cent.Between the same two periods, industrial production in Italy fell by seven per cent., in Germany by five per cent. and in France by one per cent.

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry what are the prospects for United Kingdom manufacturing output through 1983.

    The most recent official assessment of the prospects for United Kingdom manufacturing output is contained in the Financial Statement and Budget Report 1983–84. This suggested that over the forecast period, output in the manufacturing sector could rise at much the same rate as the rest of the economy, increasing by about 1·5 to 2 per cent. in 1983 as a whole.

    British Shipbuilders

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he will update the figures for public money provided to British Shipbuilders, given to the hon. Member for Tynemouth on 25 October 1982, Official Report, c. 291–92 and show the total of funds under each heading in pounds of current value.

    The following table gives details of support for BS through the national loans fund, public dividend capital and other loans, subsidies under the Industry Act 1972 and payments made under the shipbuilding redundancy payments scheme.Government will give careful consideration to specific requests for help on a case by case basis within the framework of the international rules.

    Tin Mining

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will list the specific policies implemented since May 1981 that have been aimed at assisting the growth of the Cornish tin mining industry.

    Among items known to the Department are that the method of assessing the rateable value of tin mines has been reviewed and made more equitable from 1 April 1983. Financial assistance has been provided to a mumber of companies under both the Industry Act 1972 and the Mineral exploration and Investment Grants Act 1972. Through the auspices of the Department, South Crofty Ltd. received a major loan from the European Investment Bank to assist in modernisation of its mine.

    Cornwall

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he will list by size, location and cost (a) all factories constructed and (b) all land acquired for industrial purposes by his Department and the English Industrial Estates Corporation in the Falmouth-Camborne-Hayle special development area since May 1979.

    The information is as follows:

    LocationUnitsSize (sq ft)
    1. Falmouth Special Development Area
    (a) Tretoniggie Industrial Estate, Falmouth2@23,278 each
    Parkengue, Kernick Road Industrial Estate, Penryn122,873
    3@9,817 each
    10@500 each
    10@1,000 each
    Total26113,880
    (b Bicklan, Water Road, Falmouth10·75 acres
    2. Camborne Special Development Area
    (a) Druids Road, Poole Industrial Estate, Camborne189,943
    Wilson Way, Poole Industrial Estate, Camborne148,129
    120,609
    Total3158,681
    (b) Nil
    EC aid to Cornwall
    YearEuropean Regional Development Fund Grants*European Investment Bank Loans
    Grants £ millionNumber of ProjectsLoans £ millionNumber of Projects
    19806·87NilNil
    19815·177·35
    19821·59NilNil
    * Grants committed under the quota section of the European regional development fund in respect of approved industrial and infrastructure projects in the assisted areas.
    † Loans disbursed to firms investing in projects which create or safeguard employment in the assisted areas.

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry how much money, in total, has been offered to firms in the Falmouth-Camborne-Hayle special development area in the form of (a) loans, and (b) grants since May 1979.

    Some of the assistance which has been made available to industry in the Redruth travel-to-work area—which includes Camborne and Hayle—and Falmouth under the Industrial Development Act 1982—formerly the Industry Act 1972—since May 1979 is as follows:

    £ million
    Payments of regional development grants4·8
    Section 7 grants offers of regional selective assistance2·4
    Section 8 grants offers of selective financial assistanceNIL

    Location

    Units

    Size (sq ft)

    3. Hayle Special Developments Area
    (a) Guildford Road Industrial Estate113,750
    110,236
    4@2,711 each
    14,908
    110,312
    Total850,050
    (b) Nil

    I have asked the corporation to supply the information on costs direct to my hon. Friend as this is not immediately available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry how much aid has been given by the EC to Cornwall, and for what projects, during each of the most recent years for which figures are available.

    The following table provides, for each of the years 1980 to 1982, the number of projects in Cornwall in respect of which grants or loans have been received from the European regional development fund and the European Investment Bank, respectively, and the total amounts granted.Detailed analyses by project of the allocations from the European regional development fund were published in "British Business" for 22 February 1980, 27 June 1980, 6 February 1981, 6 March 1981, 17 July 1981, 5 February 1982, 2 July 1982 and 14 January 1983.Principles of commercial confidentiality preclude the disclosure of the particular projects which have benefited from European Investment.Firms in the area can also benefit from national schemes of assistance under the Science and Technology Act 1965; and there are also many other ways in which firms could benefit, as for example under the small engineering firms investment scheme and the loan guarantee scheme. But details cannot be identified without disproportionate cost.

    Regional Development Fund

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry what is Scotland's share of the development aid made available under the second series of European regional development fund non-quota measures—1983 to 1987—as a proportion of the total available to the United Kingdom.

    These Commission proposals for a second series of ERDF non-quota measures are still being considered by member states. The amount of aid for eligible areas in Scotland cannot be established until agreement has been achieved. The Government are pressing for an early decision.

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry if, in relation to the European regional development fund non-quota measures 1983 to 1987, he will support in the Council the European Parliament's proposals for a new non-quota section aimed at favouring remote and sparsely populated areas.

    The European Commission has proposed that eligibility for non-quota section aid should be widened to include areas affected by serious problems arising from their situation as peripheral or insular regions or their depopulation. Provided that other United Kingdom interests were also adequately covered, the Government would be able to support this proposal.

    Phoenix 2

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry (1) if talks are still going on between his Department, the British Steel Corporation and private steel firms on the proposed Phoenix 2 joint venture;(2) when he expects to receive proposals from the British Steel Corporation and private steel firms on the proposed Phoenix 2 joint venture;(3) when he expects to announce a conclusion to current talks between his Department, the British Steel Corporation and private steel firms on the proposed Phoenix 2 joint venture;(4) if he will make a statement on the progress of current talks between the British Steel Corporation and private steel firms on the proposed Phoenix 2 joint venture.

    Talks are going on between BSC and private steel companies on a possible Phoenix 2 joint venture. However, no firm proposals from the companies have been received by my Department.

    Advisory Services

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry if he is now able to comment on the experiment on joint management of advisory services between the small firms service and the Council for Small Industries in Rural Areas.

    My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment and I are now able to announce the results of the experiment on the joint management of the advisory services of the small firms service and the council for small industries in rural areas. The experiment was conducted to see whether there was wasteful duplication between these two public sector advisory organisations. A copy of the full report has been placed in the Library of the House.The results of the experiment, including the use of CoSIRA's initiatory approach in the urban environment of south Bristol, have been encouraging. The different objectives, working methods and skills of the two organisations have been found to be complementary rather than a wasteful duplication. The two organisations are now building on, and broadening, their present co-operation. Increasingly they appear together at promotional events and co-operate on publications for small firms. Where appropriate the SFS uses CoSIRA offices and is represented on CoSIRA county committees. Senior management of the two organisations meet regularly. Together the organisations represent to Government the interests of small firms. The main conclusions are that although, in theory, the possibility of duplication exists, it is not a material factor in practical terms, and that there is no justification for radical changes to existing successful operations.

    Heat Recovery Technology

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry whether he will extend his Department's awareness schemes to include heat recovery technology.

    Government assistance under the support for innovation arrangements for manufacturing firms using substantial amounts of energy and wishing to commission consultants to undertake design, specification and tender work in connection with a heat recovery project in their factory will be introduced on 1 June. The help will cover consultancy to a value of £3,000 plus half the cost of necessary additional work above that figure, subject to a maximum Government grant of £10,000 for consultancy on any one project. Notes for the guidance of applicants for this support will be published in due course.

    "How To Make Your Business Grow"

    asked the Secretary of State for Industry (1) how many of the schemes listed in his Department's publication "How to make your business grow" provide Government cash; how many provide advice; and what is the number of north Staffordshire businesses that have taken advantage of each category of schemes since May 1979;(2) what has been the cost in each year since 1979, of the schemes listed in his Department's publication "How to make your business grow"; and what proportion of it has been spent in north Staffordshire.

    [pursuant to his reply, 10 May 1983, c. 240]: Of the schemes summarised in the booklet "How to make your business grow", 58 concern financial assistance and 19 relate to advisory services. There are many difficulties in making cost estimates of the sort requested: of definition, of — in some schemes —distinguishing between large and small firm beneficiaries, of deciding how to allocate "costs" in loan guarantee and some taxation measures, of lack of existing information in some cases, and so on.It is not therefore possible to give figures either of total cost or cost for each year since 1979, nor are figures available on a travel-to-work area basis for either take-up rates or spending under the schemes.A study which I have commissioned is now under way and I hope that it will be possible eventually to give some estimates and analysis. But the total will not be available on a travel-to-work area basis, though figures for some schemes may be.

    Trade

    Pilotage Service

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will make a statement on the proposals to provide compensation for pilots put forward at his request by Samuel Montagu; what the details of those proposals are; what consideration, and by whom, is now being given to those proposals, and when he expects to reach a conclusion; what proposals his Department has to introduce more voluntary and less compulsory regimes into pilotage in light of technological and navigational advances; and what consideration the Pilotage Commission, following discussion with himself, is now giving to reorganisation of the pilotage service.

    My hon. Friend's question raises the three central and difficult problems of pilotage that have vexed shipping in United Kingdom ports for many years, namely alleged overmanning, alleged restrictions and high cost arising out of pilotage, and the most flexible and effective way to organise the pilotage services. I am glad to be able to tell my hon. Friend that important advances are now being made in all three areas.Last August I invited the merchant bankers, Samuel Montagu, to look at financial proposals originally put forward by the Pilotage Commission. This involved Samuel Montagu in investigating whether the present number of some 1,400 marine pilots was surplus to the commercial needs of shipping in British ports. Samuel Montagu carried out a widespread investigation of the present number and activities of pilots, and suggested a reduction of some 40 per cent., that is about 600 pilots, who might be surplus to the commercial needs of shipping in British ports today. The cost of this commercially unnecessary number of pilots places a heavy extra cost on shipping at a time when I have been undertaking a continuing and widespread campaign to increase the competitiveness of the Merchant Navy by the removal of burdens upon it. Samuel Montagu has put forward an interim scheme for the compensation of piliots which succeeds in fulfilling three important criteria namely, first, that it should be voluntary as far as pilots taking it up is concerned; second, that it succeeds in removing a substantial part of the cost of pilotage from the shipowners; and third, that it places no extra burden on Government funds. I have invited the Pilotage Commission to take the report forward in consultation with the interested parties. I hope that all parties will be able to reach agreement quickly, and thus help to end a very long-standing and complex complaint for shipping using United Kingdom ports.Regarding compulsory or voluntary pilotage regimes, many experts believe that the advance of modern navigational aids has, and can increasingly be expected to, reduce the needs in certain circumstances for a pilot. Compulsory pilotage regimes that were once regarded as essential for safety reasons may no longer be so. I am therefore now considering under what circumstances, and to what extent, there should be a shift away from compulsory regimes to voluntary ones.The Pilotage Commission has proposed that a widespread reappraisal of the pilotage service should be undertaken. In particular, the commission believes that the possibility of a central pilotage authority which would be the pilots' employer, and responsible for the provision of all pilotage services in the United Kingdom, should be examined.

    Heathrow Airport (Charter Flights)

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will make a statement about the request from the Heathrow Airline Scheduling Committee that there should be some relaxation of the present ban on charter flights from Heathrow.

    After careful consideration, I have decided that there should be a modest relaxation of the ban on whole-plane charters at Heathrow first introduced on 1 April 1978. From 1 June 1983 airline operators will be allowed to mount ad hoc sole use or special event charters from that airport for a trial period. This relaxation will not apply to series charters or inclusive tour whole-plane charter flights and the Heathrow scheduling committee has agreed to ensure that none of the modest number of additional flights anticipated will operate during the current night-quota period. These arrangements will be kept under review each year and will end when the proposed 275,000 air transport movement limit is introduced with the completion of the fourth terminal at Heathrow. In all other respects, the Government's Heathrow-Gatwick policy remains as set out in the then Secretary of State for Trade's statement on 13 May 1981 and, in particular, the requirement that no airline that is not presently operating scheduled international passenger services to Heathrow is allowed to start such services from that airport.

    Departmental Responsibilities

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will set out the principal achievements of Her Majesty's Government within his Department's responsibilities since May 1979.

    In each year of this Government, Department of Trade Ministers have undertaken a very substantial programme of overseas visits to promote our export trade and support the efforts of British industrialists. Ministers, in some cases with a group of industrialists, visited over 30 countries during 1982 alone.There are encouraging signs of an increased uptake of our services to exporters. The Department's work in assisting exporters, under the guidance of the British Overseas Trade Board, has settled down well under the new organisation of the five overseas trade divisions. The organisation provides an extensive range of assistance and services covering information and advice on world markets, practical help in entering new markets and establishing a sales operation, and a continuing flow of selling opportunities from overseas. As a result of reorganisation, some careful management planning, and the greater use of data processing, we have been able to maintain and expand the level of our services while achieving a significant reduction in manpower consistent with the Government's plans to reduce the size of the civil service overall.A particularly important area has been our support for companies seeking overseas project business. Our projects and export policy division focuses the whole range of Government services, including ECGD support and the aid and trade provision, in support of our firms pursuing overseas projects. Taking only projects valued at £50 million or more, the Department was last year associated with successes worth about £1·4 billion to the United Kingdom which will generate over 55,000 man years of work for contractors, subcontractors and equipment suppliers throughout the country.Our export competitiveness has been helped by the significant increase in productivity of industry in the past few years, accompanied by much more realistic pay settlements. The recent record has been a good one with a growth in the volume of our exports of 2 per cent. last year at a time when world trade probably declined by 2 per cent. With some of our major markets beginning to show signs of expansion and the improvement in cost competitiveness we are now well poised to take further advantage of opportunities overseas.The Department supported the European Commission in the successful conclusion of the Tokyo round of multilateral trade agreements in 1979 which updated and reinforced the General Agreement on Tariff and Trade. The Department has, with the Commission, subsequently participated fully in the various GATT committees implementing the GATT agreements resulting from the Tokyo round.The Department participated fully in the European Community's preparations of the ministerial meeting of the GATT in November 1982. This meeting saw realistic commitments in the ministerial declaration to support the open trading system and the setting up of a useful work programme to build on and supplement the results of the Tokyo round, including the work in GATT on the service industries of great importance in United Kingdom employment and overseas earnings.We have participated fully in the renegotiation of the European Community's instruments for the protection of our industries from increases in imports from third country sources.The Department, with the Department of Industry, has ensured the tightest possible protection for the United Kingdom clothing and textile industries in the renegotiation of the GATT multi-fibre arrangement. It has put forward United Kingdom interests in the renegotiation of the Community's bilateral agreements with supplying countries under the arrangement, and in the complementary arrangements with the Mediterranean countries.We have continued to help British industry pursue complaints against injury by dumped or subsidised imports and to claim the benefits of duty relief and duty suspension available under Community legislation. In January 1983 the Department set up an anti-counterfeiting unit.The Department had a leading role in the agreement reached in 1980 to establish a common fund for commodities, which the United Kingdom ratified on 31 December 1981.The Department contributed to the exercise resulting in the Chancellor of the Exchequer's announcement about new facilities for free ports in the United Kingdom.The Department has continued to pursue maximum benefits for United Kingdom interests under our treaty rights and obligations as members of the European Community and under its preferential trade agreements, particularly with EFTA and Spain. It has played its full part in pressing for the strengthening of the internal market of the Community, including in the field of services.In July 1982 the Department published the White Paper on standards quality and international competitiveness— Cmnd. 8621—setting out the Government's proposals for strengthening our national standards system as a means of improving the international competitiveness of British Industry. The proposals were well received and the Department is co-ordinating action within Government to put them into effect. This includes the national quality campaign launched last month, as well as other measures of support for the whole standards initiative.The Department has pursued matters of concern to consumers.The Department has given financial support for organisations representing the consumer interest and published a strategy for reform of nationalised industry consumer councils. It has developed and refined the law relating to the sale and supply of goods and services and to weights and measures, arranged implementation of the average system of quantity control over packaged goods and enhanced its service for the design approval of weighing and measuring equipment. Liaison with the Director General of Fair Trading has been maintained on a wide range of subjects including the development of voluntary codes of practice. New safety regulations and prohibition orders have helped to reduce the sale of dangerous goods to the public.The Competition Act 1980 abolished the Price Commission and instituted new methods for efficiency audits of nationalised industries and other bodies. Six reports have been published; a further three are in train.The Department has taken steps to encourage a healthy and competitive civil aviation industry. The Civil Aviation Act 1980 paved the way for privatisation of British Airways and other steps have been taken to restore the airline to profitability. The Act also redefined the statutory framework of the licensing of air transport. The Secretary of State on appeal has directed the Civil Aviation Authority to license additional carriers on some important routes: this offers a wider choice to the traveller. He has also authorised a large programme of capital expenditure at many of our major airports, and has terminated the aviation security fund.In international discussions we have carried forward our commitment to the liberalisation of air services, particularly within Europe, with the aim of giving our airlines greater freedom to follow their own commercial judgment. We have secured routes from London to several major European destinations for a second United Kingdom carrier and have opened up the Hong Kong route to British Caledonian and Cathay Pacific in addition to the existing British Airways service. Within the European Community we have maintained our attempts to make progress in securing liberalising measures on regional services, air fares and competition to secure an approach that is in better harmony with the spirit of the Treaty of Rome.The Department was heavily involved in the part the Merchant Navy played in the operations in the south Atlantic last year. Planning with our NATO allies on the use of merchant shipping in time of emergency and war has been developed. The Merchant Shipping (Liner Conference) Act 1982 will enable the United Kingdom to implement the United Nations convention on a code of conduct for liner conferences, which will come into force in October 1983. In the field of maritime safety and the prevention of pollution the Department has played a leading role in the work of the International Maritime Organisation on adequate international standards, and in negotiating a European understanding on a common system of enforcement of those standards on ships visiting our ports, in order to eliminate the threat of substandard ships. Measures have been introduced to protect the health and safety of merchant seamen at work. More effective provisions have been made for dealing with maritime pollution incidents.In tourism, one of our leading service industries, we have made a start on removing duplication between the British Tourist Authority and English Tourist Board, increased the budget for section 4 project assistance and made it available to the whole of England.A wide-ranging review of policy towards the film industry has been started. In companies legislation, the Department has promoted two major measures: the Companies Act 1980 and 1981. The 1980 Act included provisions making insider dealing illegal, required fuller disclosure of directors' interests and gave better protection for minority shareholders. The 1981 Act provided a facility for companies to purchase their own shares; strengthened the law on disclosure of interests in shares; improved the companies inspection system; and extended the powers for the courts to disqualify directors. Since the relevant provisions were brought into force 10 months ago over 100 companies have bought their own shares and the Inland Revenue has approved in principle over 450 applications. In addition, the Department took advantage of these two measures to implement the second European company law directive on the distinction between private and public companies and the capital of public companies; and the fourth European company law directive on company accounts.In the field of securities trading, Professor L. C. B. Gower was commissioned in July 1981 to review the legal protection of the investor. The Department has just issued new regulations governing licensed dealers in securities and has brought to a satisfactory conclusion negotiations on the European directives dealing respectively with the particulars to be published when securities are submitted to official stock exchange listing; and to be published subsequently on a regular basis.In respect of insurance, the Department has promoted substantial legislative measures, the Insurance Companies Acts 1980, 1981 and 1982. The first extended aspects of supervisory provisions to Northern Ireland, the second implemented the European life establishment directive, as well as containing useful improvements in domestic law; the third was a consolidation measure.The Department has continued to develop the supervision of insurance, particularly by the issue of new regulations covering increased reporting to the Department by insurance companies; the most recent extended substantially the reporting of reinsurance and the controls on advertising by offshore insurers.The Department has continued to negotiate actively on a European directive on freedom of services, and on other European matters of concern to British insurers.In 1981 the Department published a comprehensive Green Paper—Cmnd. 8302—on the reform of the law on copyright, designs, and performers' protection; a wide range of response is now being analysed. The Department has continued to advance the British interest in patents, trade marks and copyright in international negotiations.The Department published in 1982 the report of the insolvency law review committee—Cmnd. 8558—and initiated public consultation on the recommendations on comprehensive proposals to produce a modern and reformed body of insolvency law.The Department has, since May 1979, reduced the number of its staff by just over 11 per cent.

    National Association Of Citizens Advice Bureaux

    asked the Minister for Trade what information he has as to the proportion of central Government funds used by the National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux for the purpose of salaries, wages and expenses in the last year for which figures are available; and how many staff were employed by the National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux in that year.

    Grant-in-aid to NACAB in 1981-82—excluding grant for SACAB and GLCABS—was spent as follows:

    £000per cent.
    Staff costs1,85344·8
    Travel and entertainment1884·5
    Office expenses2385·7
    Books and publicity1162·8
    Capital equipment360·8
    Establishment expenses (rent, rates, lighting, heating, office maintenance)1954·7
    Grant to bureaux1,21429·4
    Other2997·3
    4,139100
    At 31 March 1982 the numbers of staff employed by NACAB were as follows:

    Full-timePart-time
    Central Office9310
    Area Offices11914
    Total21224

    Manufactures (Statistics)

    asked the Minister for Trade why the United Kingdom share of world trade in manufactures has declined since 1979; and if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the United Kingdom's share of world trade in manufactures in each year since 1970 and for 1982 in whole or in part on (i) 1975 weights and (ii) current weights.

    Extremely difficult trading conditions have prevailed in world markets throughout this period. However the hon. Member will be pleased to note that the United Kingdom share increased during 1982. The figures are as follows:

    United Kingdom share of volume of world*exports of manufacturesper cent.
    Current weighted1975 weighted
    197010·412·1
    197110·412·3
    19729·511·2
    19739·411·2
    19748·910·6
    19759·110·7
    19768·810·4

    Current weighted

    1975 weighted

    19778·710·4
    19788·19·8
    19797·99·4
    19807·79·1
    19816·98·2
    ‡19827·28·4
    * Taken as the 12 main manufacturing countries.
    † Taken as standard international trade classification sections 5 to 8.
    ‡ First nine months.

    asked the Minister for Trade whether he will publish in the Official Report a table showing for the first three months of 1983 and for the 12 months ended on 31 March 1983 the United Kingdom trading deficit with the rest of the world, respectively, in manufactures less precious stones and in total trade less crude oil and precious stones.

    The information is as follows:

    United Kingdom Balance of Trade
    £ million, balance of payments basis
    European Community (original six)Rest of the world
    Visible balanceVisible balance
    3 months ending 31 March 1983
    (a) Manufactures less precious stones*-1,914+1,230
    ProposalObjectStage Reached
    Proposal for a Council Directive concerning the authorisation of scheduled international air services for the transport of passengers, mail and cargo between Member States.To liberalise Community airlines' access to air routes between regional airports in the Community and to provide more flexible procedures for governments' approval of fares charged on these routes.Under consideration by the Council; expected to be considered again June 1983.
    Proposal for a Council Directive on tariffs for scheduled air transport between Member States.To liberalise procedures for governments' approval of tariffs for the carriage of passengers and cargo by Community scheduled airlines on inter-Community routes.Under consideration by a Council Working Group.
    Amended proposal for a Council Directive on the co-ordination of the laws of Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents.The approximation of Member States' laws etc. concerning the relationship between commercial agents and their principals in order to facilitate contracts where parties are in different Member States; facilitate trade in goods between Member States under single market conditions; and improve the economic position of agents vis-a-vis their principles.Under consideration by a Council Working Group.
    Proposal for a Council Directive on the co-ordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities other than of the close-ended type.To permit certain unit trust-type funds to be marketed freely throughout the Community provided they have been authorised by one Member State in accordance with agreed minimum standards.Under consideration by a Council Working Group.
    Proposal for a Council Directive on the co-ordination of requirements for the drawing up, scrutiny and distribution of the prospectuses to be published when securities are offered for subscription or sale to the public.To require persons offering unlisted securities to the public, to prepare prospectuses along the lines of those required for listed securities, and to have them vetted by a competent authority before publication.Under consideration by a Council Working Group.
    Proposal for a Council Directive on the approval of persons responsible for carrying out statutory audits of the annual accounting documents of certain types of companies.To require Member States to introduce minimum standards for company auditors.Under consideration by a Council Working Group.

    European Community (original six)

    Rest of the world

    Visible balance

    Visible balance

    (b) Total less crude oil and precious stones*-1,978- 104

    12 months ending 31 March 1983

    (a) Manufactures less precious stones*-5,834+6,828
    (b) Total less crude oil and precious stones*-6,466+2,535

    * Standard international trade classification, division 66.

    European Community (Draft Directives)

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing those draft directives currently under discussion in the European Community dealing with services and insurance, the object of each proposal and the stage in the legislative or consultative process which each has reached.

    Information concerning the outstanding proposals for Council directives within the area of my Department's responsibility is set out in the following table:

    Proposal

    Object

    Stage Reached

    Proposal for a second Council Directive on the co-ordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance and laying down provisions to facilitate the effective exercise of freedom to provide services.To liberalise cross-frontier insurance for large industrial, commercial and professional risks.Under consideration by the Council.
    Proposal for a Council Directive on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to insurance contracts.To establish a common framework of laws in Member States relating to insurance contracts.Has been under consideration by a Council Working Group.
    Proposal for a Council Directive ammending as regards credit insurance the First Directive (73/239/EEC) on the co-ordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking-up and pursuit of the business of direct insurance other than life assurance.To require Member States to end requirements for specialisation in credit insurance and the exemption of state-backed export credit organisations from the 1973 Non-life Insurance Establishment Directive.Deferred to a Council Working Group.
    Amended proposal for a Council Directive on the co-ordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to legal expense insurance.To require Member States to end requirements for specialisation in the field of legal expense insurance.Under consideration by a Council Working Group.
    Proposal for a Council Directive amending the First Directive (73/239/EEC) on the co-ordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking-up and pursuit of the business of direct insurance other than life assurance, particularly as regards tourist assistance.To bring within the scope of the 1973 Non-life Insurance Establishment Directive those undertakings offering assistance schemes, which have the characteristics of insurance but offer benefits in kind.Under consideration by a Council Working Group.

    Cars (Imports-Exports)

    asked the Minister for Trade which countries impose higher tariffs on the import of European Community cars than is imposed by the European Community on imports to the European Community from those countries.

    I regret that this information is not readily available in the form requested. The majority of third countries have higher tariffs on imports of motor cars than does the Community. However, no tariff is payable on Community exports to the EFTA countries or to Japan; and the duty in the USA is only 2·8 per cent.

    Monopolies And Mergers Commission (General References)

    asked the Minister for Trade if, in the light of recent concern about the continued growth of buying power by larger firms, he will make a further reference of this matter to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission under section 78 of the Fair Trading Act 1973.

    The Commission's last investigation took nearly four years; its report "Discounts to Retailers" was published only two years ago. A further investigation of the same kind would not yet be justified, given the Commission's clear conclusion in 1981 that non-costrelated discounts had not in general operated against the public interest. But I continue to monitor developments closely.

    Petrol (Price)

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will ask the Director General of Fair Trading to investigate as an anti-competitive practice the agreement of the major petrol companies to fix the price of four star petrol at 179.1p.

    The Director General is keeping competition in the petrol market under review. I understand he has no evidence that there is a price-fixing agreement among the major petrol companies. If the hon. Member has any such evidence he should get in touch with the director general.

    Takeovers

    asked the Minister for Trade whether he will take steps to arrange that before the Monopolies and Mergers Commission issues its reports on takeover cases referred to it, it seeks the views of the workers in the concerns under investigation, or their trades unions.

    The Commission invariably invites evidence from the Trades Union Congress on mergers referred to it for investigation.

    Textile Industry

    asked the Minister for Trade whether Her Majesty's Government have made any representations to the French Government about their introduction of aid to their textile industry through the reduction in the social security charges normally borne by companies.

    In accordance with article 93 of the EEC treaty, we made representations about the French scheme to the Commission. The latter have since referred the matter to the European court of justice. The judgment of the court is awaited.

    Merchant Navy

    asked the Minister for Trade (1) if he will place in the Library a copy of the speech made by the hon. Member for Aberdeen, South (Mr. Sproat) to the Mercantile Marine Service Association in Liverpool on 4 May;(2) how he considers the decline of the Merchant Navy can be halted and reversed;(3) if he will set out the conclusions he has reached regarding the effect on the competitiveness of the United Kingdom Merchant Navy of the subsidies given by other countries to their fleets.

    I have today placed in the Library a copy of the speech I gave at the Mercantile Marine Service Association's annual general meeting on 4 May.In my speech, I outlined four major ways in which the present decline of the merchant fleet could certainly be halted and reversed.First, the fleet needs to be more competitive and more subsidies are not an answer: they would merely confirm the fleet in its commercial uncompetitiveness. Second, I rejected a feeble retreat into protectionism: the United Kingdom fleet already gets some 68 per cent. of its international earnings from cross-trades, and if we protected our trades, other countries would protect their trades against us, and that 68 per cent. would be gravely put at risk. Third, I showed that the United Kingdom fleet was in far too many cases seriously overmanned—25 per cent. overmanning was not unusual—vis-a-vis the best of our European competitors. I said this overmanning and other high crew costs, such as repatriation costs, were seriously undermining our competitiveness, and that this must be sorted out by the industry itself. I also listed the wide range of measures I had recently taken to reduce the Government's burden on shipping. Fourth, I said that the industry must make a sharp analysis of those parts of the world shipping market where a high-cost fleet like ours could still prosper because of its easier access to capital, its higher technology and skills.I said that the only realistic strategy for the future is for all sides to put the good of the whole industry first, before vested interests, and agree on the ways necessary to achieve the goal of increased competitiveness. We have fallen behind others, and however painful the transitional phase, must make ourselves more competitive by comparison with the best of our developed world competitors.Our competitors have not overtaken us by virtue of governmental subsidies. I outlined the subsidies that other countries enjoy in a similar speech I distributed at the MNAOA conference on 10 May 1983, which proves this point, and I am setting these out below: In the United States there is a range of measures including direct production aids to shipbuilding, home credit arrangements which are more favourable than OECD terms, and an operating subsidy; Belgium also has favourable home credit arrangements and grants operating subsidies; Sweden, too, operates favourable home credit arrangements as well as a recently introduced income tax rebate scheme which has the same effect as operating subsidies; Norway, too, has its own home credit arrangements and grants direct production aids to shipbuilding; Japan and. Greece have favourable home credit arrangements; and France, Spain, Italy, and Brazil all have beneficial home credit arrangements as well as, direct production aids to shipbuilding.I have concluded, therefore, that while the aggregate of varied subsidies, and other Governments' policies, around the world does, beyond dispute, have an effect on our competitive position, it is equally clear that it is not an excess of subsidy by other nations over that which we ourselves provide that prevents the United Kingdom merchant navy from doing better. It is not a major, nor even hardly a minor, reason for the superiority of those merchant navies at present larger than ours.The main reason our fleet is declining is that it is uncompetitive vis-a-vis the best European fleets. The main constituent part of that uncompetitiveness is high crew costs. In my speech, I invited the GCBS and the seafaring unions to meet together with the Department of Trade to discuss ways and means of improving the position of the Merchant Navy.

    Textiles

    asked the Minister for Trade (1) what was the percentage change in the United Kingdom visible trade balance in textiles with other members of the European Community from 1979 to 1980, 1980 to 1981 and 1981 to 1982;(2) what was the percentage change in the United Kingdom visible trade balance in clothing with other members of the European Community from 1979 to 1980, 1980 to 1981 and 1981 to 1982.

    This information is set out below:

    United Kingdom trade in textiles and clothing, 1980-82, with rest of European Community
    Values, £ million
    198019811982
    Textile goods
    Exports, fob716594586
    Imports, cif8521,0331,178
    Crude Balance-136-439-592
    Change over previous year, per cent.+42-323-135
    Clothing
    Exports, fob419391393
    Imports, cif313368418
    Crude balance+105+23-25
    Change over previous year, per cent.+137-78-210

    Source: UK Overseas Trade Statistics, SITC (R2): textile goods: Division 65, Groups 266, 267 and 268.7 (part), and Item 847.11; clothing: Division 84 less Group 848 and Item 847.11.

    Note: The European Community is defined as currently constituted.

    Scottish Association Of Citizens Advice Bureaux

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will exempt the Scottish Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux from the coming review, in view of its autonomy and of the fact that it has undergone two reviews in the past three years.

    The review team may wish to invite evidence from SACAB; but as the right hon. Member points out the association's staffing and management structure were examined last year, and will not be reviewed again.

    Information And Advice Centres

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will take steps to study the level of provision of information and advice centres and the level of funding of those that exist.

    I am currently considering the National Consumer Council's recent report on information and advice services, which comments on these matters.

    Cornwall

    asked the Minister for Trade how much money, in total, has been made available for tourism in Cornwall in the form of (a) loans and (b) grants since May 1979.

    Loans and grants towards the capital costs of selected tourism projects in England are made through the scheme of financial assistance administered by the English Tourist Board under section 4 of the Development of Tourism Act 1969. The Government also provide exchange risk cover for loans from the European investment bank for tourism projects.Since May 1979 grants to the value of £1,634,000 have been approved by the English Tourist Board for capital projects located in Cornwall under the section 4 scheme. In addition, the Government have provided exchange risk cover on £1,600,000 of European investment bank loan finance during this period.The English Tourist Board also makes an annual subvention from its grant-in-aid towards the funding of the non-statutory West Country tourist board. These contributions have amounted to £403,000 for the four years from 1979-80 to 1982-83. In addition, Cornwall benefits from the genera] promotion of domestic tourism carried out by the English Tourist Board.

    Oil Supplies

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will estimate how much less oil and gas tanker tonnage is currently required to meet the fuel needs of the United Kingdom as a result of the development of the oil reserves of the North sea.

    I regret that no reliable estimate can be made of the additional tanker tonnage that would be required in the absence of the development of the oil reserves of the North Sea.

    Falklands Campaign

    asked the Minister for Trade if Falklands campaign medals have now been issued to those non-British merchant seamen who served in the south Atlantic on board the SS Uganda and SS Canberra.

    Medals have now been issued to all those non-British merchant seamen who served in the south Atlantic on board the SS Uganda and the SS Canberra and whose Governments have indicated that their citizens may receive them.

    Civil Aviation Authority

    asked the Minister for Trade when he expects to make an announcement about the appointment of a full-time chief executive to the Civil Aviation Authority.

    My right hon. and noble Friend and I are discussing with the chairman of the Civil Aviation Authority a number of aspects of the authority's board, including the possibility of appointing a full-time chief executive, but we have not yet reached any firm conclusions.

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will make a statement about the review of the Civil Aviation Authority's activities by the chairman of the Civil Aviation Authority, Mr. John Dent; when he expects to receive the Monopolies and Mergers Commission report on the civil activities of the National Air Traffic Service; and what further action he proposes following his consideration of these two reports.

    The chairman of the Civil Aviation Authority has written a number of letters to me on the subject of his own review of the authority. I have asked him to consider how his conclusions can be made known to interested parties and how we should consult them about the proposals.The Monopolies and Mergers Commission was initially given until 30 June to complete its report. The Commission has just sought an extension of two months, which we are considering. When the report is made to my right hon. and noble Friend the Secretary of State it will be presented to Parliament in the normal way, and the Civil Aviation Authority will be asked for its comments before my right hon. and noble Friend makes a statement on the recommendations, and on the necessary follow-up action. The recommendation of the MMC will be considered together with Mr. Dent's proposals, and with any further comments that interested parties may have on the way in which the CAA conducts its activities. Further action will depend on the conclusions reached after this consideration.

    asked the Minister for Trade when he expects to know the decision of the Civil Aviation Authority about the removal of the Civil Aviation Authority from London to Milton Keynes, or any other sites outside London, which have been considered; and what the cost-benefits are of each site outside London, respectively.

    I am glad to be able to tell my hon. Friend that I understand that the authority has decided in Principle to move its headquarters to a site outside central London, provided that certain practical operational problems, which it is now examining, can be overcome. Among the sites being considered are Milton Keynes, Farnborough and Uxbridge.Initial estimates suggested a saving of several million pounds per year might be achieved by a move from central London to Milton Keynes or a similar location. The authority is currently involved in a detailed financial appraisal of the various sites and a decision will be announced in due course.

    Domestic Air Services (Deregulation)

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will make a statement on the latest situation regarding deregulation of domestic air services in the United Kingdom; what response he has had from the Civil Aviation Authority; when the Civil Aviation Authority will be deciding what document it will submit to aviation interests on the subject of deregulation; whether he will seek to ensure that consumer interests are fully consulted; and if he has anything to add to his parliamentary answer on deregulation in November following his visit to the United States to study deregulation there.

    If it is decided that the Civil Aviation Authority should issue a new statement of policy on air transport licensing, in accordance with section 69(3) of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 the authority will have to consult both the civil air transport industry and users of air transport services.My right hon. and noble Friend the Secretary of State and I are considering whether the authority should be required under section 69(3) to publish a revised statement within six months.I have nothing further at this time to add to my parliamentary answer on 10 November 1982 to my hon. Friend the Member for Tynemouth (Mr. Trotter), when I explained that it was my conclusion that, following my study of aviation deregulation in the United States, deregulation had proved on balance to be a substantial benefit to both passengers and airlines in the United States.

    British Airports Authority

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will now give consideration to the privatisation of the British Airports Authority.

    Aerodromes (Privatisation)

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will make a statement on his programme for privatising the Civil Aviation Authority's aerodromes in Scotland; whether any local authorities have shown interest in acquiring a part interest in any aerodromes; and whether he would be prepared to consider offers for the whole or part interest in any aerodrome from an airline.

    [pursuant to the reply, 9 May 1983, c. 195]: Following the announcement, on 28 March 1983, in a parliamentary answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Fife, East (Mr. Henderson) that the Government intended to privatise the Civil Aviation Authority's aerodromes in Scotland, the Authority's chairman and I have been approached by a number of persons and groups who are interested in considering acquiring one or more of these aerodromes. I have made it clear that the Government and the CAA would be willing to consider offers that included local authority participation. Mr. Dent would certainly be prepared to consider any offer by an airline to acquire one or more of the aerodromes. I regard it as essential that, on privatising these aerodromes, the interests of the local communities are properly safeguarded. The Government decided to offer these aerodromes to the private sector, with or without local authority participation, because it believes that commercial organisations should be able to run them more cost-effectively, and this would be of benefit to the taxpayer, since all but one of these aerodromes are in receipt of a subsidy from the Scottish Office; the airlines, because a more cost-efficient operation could mean lower landing charges; and the passenger, because fares, following lower costs on the airlines could come down. All those persons or groups interested in acquiring Tiree, Islay, Wick, Sumburgh, Inverness, Stornoway, Benbecula and Kirkwall—or any one of them, or a combination of them—should get in touch with Mr. John Dent, chairman of the CAA at CAA House, 45-49 Kingsway, London WC2B 6TE.

    Liverpool (Ministerial Visit)

    asked the Minister for Trade if he will make a statement on the Under-Secretary of State's recent visit to Liverpool.

    [pursuant to the reply, 11 May 1983]: I visited Liverpool on 4 May to address the annual general meeting of the Mercantile Marine Services Association.

    Company Directors

    asked the Minister for Trade how many applications have been made in each of the last six years to disqualify persons from acting as company directors under the provisions of section 9 of the Insolvency Act 1976.

    [pursuant to the reply, 11 May 1983, c. 293]: Since 1 October 1977, when section 9 of the Insolvency Act 1976 came into effect, the following numbers of applications have been made to the courts:

    PeriodNumber of Applications
    1 October 1977 to 31 December 1977Nil
    Year to 31 December 1978Nil
    Year to 31 December 19792
    Year to 31 December 19801
    Year to 31 December 19811
    Year to 31 December 19829
    1 January 1983 to 30 April 19834

    National Finance

    Personal Taxation

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many (a) tax units and (b) individuals taken out of tax by his recent Budget had children.

    About 120,000 fewer tax units with dependent children will pay income tax in 1983-84 than if personal allowances had remained at 1982-83 levels. Of these, about 15,000 are single-parent families.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will update to 1983-84 the information on tax reliefs provided in his answer of 21 December 1982 to the hon. Member for Kensington (Sir B. Rhys Williams), Official Report, c. 499.

    The yield in a full year at 1983-84 income levels from restricting all personal allowances to the basic rate is estimated at about £325 million. For other allowances and reliefs, information is available only in respect of the reliefs for mortgage interest, retirement annuity premiums, and superannuation contributions. It is not possible to estimate precisely the combined effect of restricting these reliefs and personal allowances to the basic rate, but the yield is thought to be in the region of £675 million. On the basis of the Budget proposals, which will be implemented when we return after the election, the figures are £300 million and £600 million respectively.These estimates are on the basis of thresholds and allowances in the Finance Bill now before Parliament.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the net saving in 1983–84 of abolishing the married man's tax allowance for those below pension age and introducing a partially transferable tax allowance equal to 56 per cent. of the single person's allowance.

    The net tax yield in a full year, at 1983–84 levels of income, allowances, and so on, of replacing the married man's tax allowance for those below pension age by the single person's allowance plus a transferable allowance equal to 56 per cent. of the single person's allowance would be approximately £1,250 million, assuming independent taxation of husbands and wives.

    Overseas Earnings (Taxation)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, further to his reply dated 16 March, Official Report, c. 163–66, concerning payment of tax on income earned overseas, whether he will estimate the increase in the asset base held overseas in each of those years on which tax is payable to the United Kingdom authorities.

    I regret that the information requested is not available. Capital transfer tax and capital gains tax are both levied on the change of ownership or disposal of assets. No statistical information is available on the extent of such changes in the years requested. Income tax may or may not be related to the possession of assets. Income from assets is not always distinguished from that derived from trading. It is impossible, therefore, to provide information on the assets which generated the income.

    Income Tax

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much PAYE income tax was written off as irrecoverable debt in the most recent year for which figures are available.

    The latest available figure is £13 million, for the year ended 31 October 1981.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will update his reply to the hon. Member for Kensington of 17 February 1982, Official Report, c. 150, showing the amount by which he estimates that the income tax base in 1982–83 was reduced on account of the income tax allowances, reliefs and exemptions listed in the public expenditure White Paper, Cmnd. 8789-II, table 4.7.

    [pursuant to his reply, 10 May 1983, c. 283.]: Estimates for 1982–83 are not yet available. For 1981–82, the total income of households is estimated at approximately £205 billion and this is reduced by around £105 billion by those income tax allowances, reliefs and exemptions relevant to the household sector. Some of the exemptions and so on listed in table 4.7 of Cmnd. 8789-II relate to institutions rather than to members of households — for example charities, life assurance funds. The income of these institutions has not been included in the total of £205 billion.

    Borrowing Requirement

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will estimate the effect on the money supply and the exchange rate over a period of 12 months of not funding the borrowing requirement at a rate of interest in excess of the equivalent to 6 per cent. for 20-year gilt-edged securities in proportion to the present yield curve.

    Any quantification of the effects would be subject to wide margins of error, because there is no direct historical experience of an attempt to raise finance at interest rates considerably below those ruling in the market.

    Company Share Ownership

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent representations he has received calling for further assistance for employees wishing to obtain share ownership in their companies.

    We receive a variety of such representations from time to time, but in general the changes which the Government have introduced to encourage further employee share ownership have been warmly welcomed.

    Bank For International Settlements

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to his answer of 5 May, Official Report, c. 112, if he will list in the Official Report the 29 countries with voting or representative rights in relation to the Bank for International Settlements; if he will list the circumstances in which others may exercise such rights; and if he will make a statement.

    Details of the United Kingdom's interest in the Bank for International Settlements were published in the Official Report on 26 April—[Vol. 41, c. 291] — but holdings of BIS shares by other central banks are a matter for the central banks concerned and the BIS. The central banks of Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom are represented on the board of directors of the BIS. Should the central bank of any country not wish to exercise its rights to vote at the general meeting, they may be exercised by a financial institution of widely recognised standing and of the same nationality appointed by the board of directors of the BIS and not objected to by the central bank in question.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to his answer of 5 May, Official Report, c. 112, if he will take steps to obtain details of present shareholdings and of changes since May 1979 in the Bank for International Settlements; and if he will make a statement.

    Since ownership of Bank for International Settlements shares does not automatically confer voting or representative rights detailed knowledge about other countries shareholdings would be of little practical significance. The operations of the Bank for International Settlements are a matter for its board of directors.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what information he has as to the constitution and operations of the Bank for International Settlements; if, pursuant to the answer of 5 May, Official Report, c. 112, he will give precise details of the circumstances in which shareholdings confer voting or representative rights; and if he will make a statement.

    A summary of the Bank for International Settlements' activities is included in the published annual report. The constitution of the BIS was set down in the statutes, given in a White Paper in 1931, Cmnd. 3766. A few changes have since been made, principally to allow more central banks to subscribe to shares and to give the board more flexibility in setting the annual dividend. Under the statutes the right of representation and of voting, in proportion to the number of shares subscribed in each country, may be exercised by the central bank of the country or its nominee.

    Overseas Companies (Shares)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether the acquisition by the Bank of England of shares in companies registered abroad requires his consent; and if he will make a statement.

    Taxation Revenue

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will state the estimated revenue in 1983–84 from (a) taxation of unemployed benefit and (b) capital transfer tax.

    An estimate of the yield from taxation of unemployment benefits for 1983–84 was set out in the answer given to my hon. Friend the Member for Chippenham (Mr. Needham) on 21 December 1982.—[Vol. 34, c. 497.] The estimated yield from capital transfer tax on the basis of the proposals in the Budget can be found in table 5.11 of the Financial Statement and Budget Report for 1983–84. The estimate mentioned there should be increased a little for the short time that the Finance Act 1983 remains in force.

    Privatisation

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the reply to the right hon. Member for Swansea, West (Mr. Williams) on 19 January, Official Report, c. 330–31, which privatisation arrangements have involved extra expenditure; and what was the amount.

    Cost information on individual privatisations is not available centrally, but service-wide figures for net savings—that is pay bill savings minus any extra expenditure — are given in note 5 of the seventh report, 1980–81, and the first special report, 1982–83, of the Treasury and Civil Service Committee.

    Scottish £1 Coin

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will give the Scottish variant £1 coin, due to be minted in 1984, an inscription on the side of the coin in Gaelic rather than in Latin.

    I shall let the right hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.

    Non-Industrial Civil Servants (Pay)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if a settlement has now been reached in the 1983 pay negotiations for non-industrialised civil servants.

    Yes. The Council of Civil Service Unions has formally accepted the offer put to it on 31 March which its negotiating team had undertaken to recommend to constituent unions. The settlement, which covers the bulk of non-industrial civil servants, is worth on average 4·86 per cent.

    Departmental Staffs

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the number of staff in post in central Government Departments on 1 April.

    At 1 April 1983 there were 648,700 staff-in-post — 518,300 non-industrial and 130,400 industrial; that is a reduction of 3,800 since 1 January 1983. The number of civil servants has fallen by 83,600, of 11·4 per cent., since the Government came to office. This means that we now have the smallest Civil Service for 20 years.

    Holiday Lettings

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he has anything to add to the answer of 28 April, Official Report, c. 428, about the tax treatment of holiday lettings.

    I refer my hon. Friend to the statement I made during the debate on the Finance Bill on 11 May. —[Vol. 42, c. 841.]

    Income Tax (Mortgage Interest Relief)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will estimate (a) the amount of income tax deferred from 1982–83 to 1983–84 as a result of the Inland Revenue discontinuing the adjustment of pay-as-you-earn codes for mortgage interest relief on changes in the rate of interest and (b) the number of taxpayers affected.

    [pursuant to his reply, 9 May 1983, c. 184]: Some £200 million, involving 4½ million PAYE taxpayers.

    Cash Limits

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will give the revised cash limits for 1983–84 which take account of (a) the reduction in national insurance surcharge announced in the Budget, and (b) the establishment by the Management and Personnel Office of a centralised occupational health nursing service for the Civil Service.

    A list of revised cash limits is shown in the following table.The total reduction in cash limits in respect of the change in national insurance surcharge is £45 million. In addition there are savings in votes not subject to cash limits totalling about £1½ million. On de minimis grounds, cash limits are not being reduced where the effect of the national insurance surcharge reduction is less than £50,000 unless changes are being made for other reasons.

    As mentioned in the introductory note to Class XIII, Vote 12, a centralised occupational health nursing service has been established under the aegis of the Civil Service medical advisory service with effect from 1 April 1983. Accordingly the cash limit for Class XIII, Vote 12, Central Management of the Civil Service, etc., is increased by £171,000. This increase is entirely offset by reductions in 9 other cash limits as marked in the table. There is therefore no increase in public expenditure.

    The effect on the cash limit for Class XIII, Vote 12, taking account of both changes in a net increase; all the other changes shown in the table are reductions.

    Revisions to 1983–84 cash limits resulting from the reduction in national insurance surcharge, the establishment of an occupational health nursing service and some other changes A. Voted expenditure £ thousand

    Class

    Vote

    Accounting Department

    Description of expenditure

    Current cash limit

    Reduction

    Revised cash limit

    I1Ministry of Defence *Pay etc. of the armed forces and civilians, stores, supplies and miscellaneous services6,134,88411,3316,123,553
    I2Ministry of Defence*Procurement7,557,9401,1607,556,780
    I4Property Services Agency*Defence accommodation services915,996181915,815
    I5Ministry of Defence*Dockyard services427,520695426,825
    II1Foreign and Commonwealth Office†Overseas representation: diplomatic, consular and other foreign and commonwealth services328,904245328,659
    II3Foreign and Commonwealth OfficeBritish Broadcasting Corporation: external services77,1779577,082
    III6Forestry CommissionForestry59,52116059,361
    III7Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and FoodDepartmental administration193,555358193,197
    IV4Department of TradeDepartment of Trade196,604228196,376
    IV6Department of IndustryScientific and technological assistance309,66165309,596
    IV7Department of EnergyScientific and technological assistance: nuclear energy210,570279210,291
    IV13Department of EmploymentLabour market services499,1401,068498,072
    IV16Department of EmploymentManpower Services Commission1,211,4415361,210,905
    IV17Department of EmploymentAdministration187,013291186,722
    IV18Department of Industry†Central and miscellaneous services75,81516375,652
    IV19Department of Energy†Administration and miscellaneous services22,7783222,746
    IV23Department of EmploymentHealth and Safety Commission87,99312087,373
    VI2Department of TransportTransport services and central administration114,854195114,659
    VI4Department of Transport†Driver and vehicle licensing100,01511999,396
    VIII2Department of the EnvironmentCentral environmental services etc.117,708106117,iS02
    VIII4Department of the EnvironmentRoyal palaces, royal parks, historic buildings, ancient monuments and the national heritage72,63321072,423
    VIII5Department of the Environment†Central administration and environmental research170,762450170,312
    IX1Lord Chancellor's DepartmentAdministration of justice, England and Wales85,5549985,455
    IX8Home OfficePrisons, England and Wales538,3761,132537,244
    IX11Home OfficeCentral and administrative services164,986289164,697
    XI1Department of Health and Social SecurityHealth and personal social services, England8,552,82313,5738,539,250
    XII5Department of Health and Social SecurityAdministration and miscellaneous services714,1731,151713,022
    XIII4TreasuryEconomic and financial administration42,9416542,876
    XIII5Customs and Excise DepartmentEconomic and financial administration321,723712321,011
    XIII6Inland Revenue†Economic and financial administration753,4811,562751,919
    XIII10Department for National Savings†Economic and financial administration144,5421,195143,347
    XIII12Management and Personnel Office†Central management of the Civil Service30,749113630·85
    XIII17Land RegistryRecords, registrations and surveys64,93314364,790
    XIII23Ordnance Survey†Records, registrations and surveys17,3598417,275

    The revised cash limit for Class XI, Vote 1, Health and Personal Social Services England includes an addition of £1,427,000 to allow for additional capital expenditure by health authorities on their share of joint financed urban programme projects. This increase has been offset by a reduction in local authority capital expenditure, and will not therefore add to public expenditure.

    Three other cash limit reductions, resulting from a revised assessment of the appropriate level of expenditure, are also included in the table. These are as follows:

    • Class VIII, Vote 4—a reduction of £140,000
    • Class VIII, Vote 5—a reduction of £251,000
    • Class XIII, vote 10—a reduction of £1,000,000

    Class

    Vote

    Accounting Department

    Description of expenditure

    Current cash limit

    Reduction

    Revised cash limit

    XIV1Property Services AgencyCivil accommodation repayment services278,23567278,168
    XIV2Property Services AgencyAdministration and miscellaneous services314,746441314,305
    XV4Scottish Economic Planning DepartmentManpower Services Commission, Scotland137,25566137,189
    XV14Scottish Home and Health DepartmentPrisons, hospitals and community health services, etc. Scotland1,363,1372,6411,360,496
    XV24Scottish OfficeScottish Office administration94,43020594,225
    XVI1Welsh OfficeTourism, roads and transport, housing, other environmental services, education, libraries, arts, health and personal social services, Wales718,1381,016717,122
    XVI4Welsh OfficeManpower Services Commission, Wales70,8953570,860
    XVI7Welsh OfficeOther services: Welsh Office31,2445531,189
    XVII1Northern Ireland OfficeLaw, order, protective and miscellaneous services390,313599389,714

    * The four cash limited defence votes are each seperate cash limits, but by agreement with the Treasury, they are managed as a global cash limit.

    † These are the cash limits affected by the establishment of the centralised occupational health nursing service.
    ‡In the case of this vote the £136,000 is an increase rather than a decrease to the cash limit. The increase in the cash limit due to the establishment of the nursing service is partly offset by the reduction in national insurance surcharge.

    B. Other central Government expenditure £ million

    Cash block

    Department

    Description of expenditure

    Current cash limit

    Reduction

    Revised cash limit

    BOE1Bank of EnglandBank of England administration costs in respect of note issue, exchange equalisation account and debt management78·00·177·9
    NID1Northern Ireland DepartmentsServices analogous to Great Britain services covered by cash limits1,977·62·21,975·4

    Scotland

    Social Science Studies (Reassessment)

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if, in view of his public statement concerning a national reassessment of the provision of social science and applied social studies courses in Scottish central institutions, he will (a) publish the plan upon which this is based, (b) list the professional bodies consulted, (c) list the educational institutions consulted, (d) name the members of the advisory review body and (e) explain the basis of the decisions already taken with regard to the social science and applied social studies degrees at Paisley college of technology.

    The proposed reassessment of social science provision and the decision to discontinue approval of the BA degree in social science at Paisley college of technology are in accordance with the Government's aim to improve the output of graduates qualified in the technical and managerial disciplines necessary for the country's economic recovery. The reassessment will be

    Table 1
    Unemployment by duration at 5 April 1979
    ConstituencyTravel-to-work areaUp to 26 weeks26 to 52 weeks52 to 104 weeks104 to 156 weeksOver 156 weeks
    AyrAyr2,0481,025595259349
    Edinburgh, CentralEdinburgh8,9003,2642,2668611,294
    Edinburgh, West
    Edinburgh Pentlands
    Aberdeen, SouthAberdeen3,086925514115113
    Glasgow, CathcartGlasgow25,41410,1017,4172,9974,864

    conducted by the Scottish Education Department in consultation with the college authorities and the appropriate professional bodies.

    Labour Statistics

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories: (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (i) Ayr, (ii) Edinburgh, Central, (iii) Edinburgh, West, (iv) Edinburgh, Pentlands, (v) Aberdeen, South, (vi) Glasgow, Cathcart and (vii) Cunninghame, North, respectively.

    The information requested is set out in the tables below. The figures for April 1979 are based on the number of unemployed people registered at jobcentres and careers offices—the old basis of the count; those for January 1983 are based on the number of claimants at unemployment benefit offices — the new basis of the count.

    Constituency

    Travel-to-work area

    Up to 26 weeks

    26 to 52 weeks

    52 to 104 weeks

    104 to 156 weeks

    Over 156 weeks

    Cunninghame, NorthGreenock2,7001,089731258353
    Irvine2,8331,240704249367

    Table 2

    Unemployment by duration at 13 January 1983

    Constituency

    Travel-to-work area

    Up to 26 weeks

    26 to 52 weeks

    52 to 104 weeks

    104 to 156 weeks

    Over 156 weeks

    AyrAyr3,2621,4181,499808686
    Edinburgh, CentralEdinburgh15,9136,6865,9972,6362,119
    Edinburgh, West
    Edinburgh Pentlands
    Aberdeen, SouthAberdeen6,2001,8111,068416307
    Glasgow, CathcartGlasgow40,19919,29118,41510,58610,163
    Cunninghame, NorthGreenock3,7431,4501,598802932
    Irvine4,7832,2421,9311,031763

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many (a) school leavers, (b) people under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 54 years and (e) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (i) Ayr, (ii) Edinburgh, Central, (iii) Edinburgh, West,

    Table 1
    Unemployed at 5 April 1979
    ConstituencyTravel-to-work areaSchool leavers (aged under 18)Aged under 25Aged 25 to 44Aged 45 to 54Aged 55 and over
    AyrAyr2051,5311,330499916
    Edinburgh, CentralEdinburgh3086,1126,0621,9312,480
    Edinburgh, West
    Edinburgh Pentlands
    Aberdeen, SouthAberdeen401,7551,872554572
    Glasgow, CathcartGlasgow2,00020,07518,5756,7825,361
    Cunninghame,NorthGreenock3202,0641,848690529
    Irvine3132,2421,969612567
    Table 2
    Unemployed at 13 Janaury 1983
    ConstituencyTravel-to-work areaSchool leavers (aged under 18)Aged under 25Aged 25 to 44Aged 45 to 54Aged 55 and over
    AyrAyr5113,0582,6248601,131
    Edinburgh, CentralEdinburgh2,27914,46511,2763,1944,416
    Edinburgh, West
    Edinburgh Pentlands
    Aberdeen, SouthAberdeen3964,0033,6281,1121,059
    Glasgow, CathcartGlasgow7,34442,40333,95511,89010,406
    Cunninghame,NorthGreenock7753,7852,8521,021957
    Irvine7064,3833,9621,3071,098

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in each of the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (a) Ayr, (b) Edinburgh, Central, (c) Edinburgh, West, (d) Edinburgh, Pentlands, (e) Aberdeen, South, (f) Glasgow, Cathcart and (g) Cunninghame, North, respectively.

    (iv) Edinburgh, Pentlands, (v) Aberdeen, South, (vi) Glasgow, Cathcart, and (vii) Cunninghame, North, respectively.

    The information requested is set. out in the tables following. The figures for April 1979 are based on the number of unemployed people registered at jobcentres and careers offices — the old basis of the count; those for January 1983 are based on the number of claimants at unemployment benefit offices.

    The information requested is set out in the table following.The figures for May 1979 are based on the number of unemployed people registered at jobcentres and careers offices—the old basis of the count—and are therefore not directly comparable with the figures for March 1983, which are based on the number of claimants at unemployment benefit offices — the new basis of the count.

    Unemployment in March 1983 and May 1979

    Constituency

    Travel-to-work

    10 March 1983

    10 May 1979

    Area

    Actual

    per cent.

    Actual

    per cent.

    AyrAyr7,59016·23,9738·5
    Edinburgh, CentralEdinburgh31,99511·115,6345·4
    Edinburgh, West
    Edinburgh, Pentlands
    Aberdeen, SouthAberdeen9,6427·34,4963·4
    CathcartGlasgow96,04916·548,5258·3
    Cunninghame, NorthGreenock8,27817·14,96510·2
    Irvine10,29824·44,85411·5

    Note:

    The travel-to-work areas comprise the following employment office areas:

    Ayr—Ayr and Troon.

    Edinburgh—Edinburgh City, Portobello, Leith, Dalkeith, Loanhead, Musselburgh and Penicuik.

    Aberdeen—Aberdeen.

    Glasgow—Glasgow City, Barrhead, Clydebank, Cumbernauld, East Kilbride, Kilsyth and Kirktilloch.

    Greenock—Greenock, Largs and Port Glasgow.

    Irvine—Irvine, Kilwinning and Saltcoats.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many (a) school leavers, (b) people under 25 years, (c) those aged 25 to 44 years, (d) those aged 45 to 54 years, and (e) those aged over 65 years, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983 in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the constituency of Stirling.

    The constituency of Stirling corresponds most nearly to the Stirling travel-to-work area — which comprises the employment office areas of Stirling and Alloa. The information requested is set out in the following table.

    Unemployed by age in the Stirling Travel-to-Work Area
    5 April 197913 January 1983
    School leavers under 18 years150664
    Total number under 25 years*1,3513,667
    Aged 25 to 44 years1,0762,563
    Aged 45 to 54 years326731
    Aged 55 years and over360848
    * Including the school leavers shown in the previous line.

    Notes:

    1. Separate figures are not available for unemployed people aged 65 years; they are included in the figures for people aged 55 years and over which have been provided instead.

    2. The figures for April 1979 are based on the numbers of unemployed people registered at jobcentres and careers offices—the old basis of the unemployment count—in the Stirling travel-to-work area; those for January 1983 are based on the numbers of claimants at unemployment benefit offices—the new basis of the count.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many (a) school leavers, (b) people aged under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 54 years and (e) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the parliamentary constituency of Edinburgh, South.

    The information requested is set out in the following table. The Edinburgh, South constituency falls within the Edinburgh travel-to-work area—which comprises the employment office areas in Edinburgh, together with the Leith, Portobello, Dalkeith, Loanhead, Musselburgh and Penicuik employment office areas.

    Numbers of Unemployed People, by age, in the Edinburgh Travel-to-Work Area

    5 April 1979

    13 January 1983

    School leavers under 18 years3082,279
    Total number under 25 years*6,11214,465
    Aged 25–44 years6,06211,276
    Aged 45–54 years1,9313,194
    Aged 55 years and over2,4804,416

    * Including the school leavers shown in the previous line.

    Note:

    The figures for April 1979 are based on the number of unemployed people registered at Jobcentres and Careers Offices—the old basis of the count—in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area and are therefore not directly comparable with the figures for January 1983 which are based on the number of claimants at unemployment benefit offices—the new basis of the count.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the parliamentary constituency of Edinburgh, South.

    The Edinburgh, South constituency falls within the Edinburgh travel-to-work area — which comprises the employment office areas within Edinburgh city, together with the Leith, Portobello, Dalkeith, Loanhead, Musselburgh and Penicuik employment office areas.On 10 May 1979, the number of people registered as unemployed — the old basis of the count — in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area was 15,634, and the unemployment rate was 5·4 per cent. At 10 March 1983, the number of unemployed claimants—the new basis of the count — in the same area was 31,995 and the unemployment rate was 11·1 per cent.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories: (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the parliamentary constituency of Edinburgh, South.

    The constituency of Edinburgh, South forms part of the Edinburgh travel-to-work area. The information requested is set out in the following table.

    Unemployed by duration of unemployment in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area:
    5 April 197913 January 1983
    up to 26 weeks8,90015,913
    26 to 52 weeks3,2646,686
    52 to 104 weeks2,2665,997
    104 to 156 weeks8612,636
    Over 156 weeks1,2942,119

    Note:

    Figures for April 1979 are based on the numbers of people registered at jobcentres and careers offices—the old basis of the count—in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area; those for January 1983 are based on the number of claimants at unemployment benefit offices—the new basis of the count.

    Gross weekly earnings (£) of full-time employees whose pay was not affected by absence in April each year

    Men (age 21 and over)

    Women (aged 18 and over)

    Modal range

    *

    Percentage of employees

    Modal range

    *

    Percentage of employees

    197860–701540–5029
    197970–801350–6025
    198090–1001160–7020
    1981100–1101060–7018
    1982100–110960–7016

    Source: New Earnings Survey.

    * The range (in units of £10) containing the largest number of employees.

    Mitsubishi (Electric) Ltd

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on his Department's negotiations with Mitsubishi (Electric) Ltd. about proposals to site a new video recorder manufacturing plant at Haddington, East Lothian.

    Mitsubishi Electric corporation announced in January last that it planned to produce video tape recorders in Scotland. The details of the project have not yet been made public.Discussions between my Department and individual companies are commercially confidential.

    Electricity Boards

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether he has set any objectives for the Scottish electricity boards.

    In keeping with the statement by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Industry on the relationship between the Government and the nationalised industries, I have now set objectives for the South of Scotland electricity board and the North of Scotland hydro-electric board.In view of the close collaboration that exists between the two boards, it seemed most appropriate to set the objectives as a common list applicable to both boards. Each board will, of course, retain the responsibility for ensuring that the objectives are met within their own organisations.

    Distalgesic Drug

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will institute an inquiry into the effects of the drug distalgesic on patients in Scotland.

    No. The Committee on Safety of Medicines is currently reviewing the safety of Distalgesic and I have no doubt will recommend any action it considers necessary.

    Average Earnings

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if, pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for Glasgow, Central (Mr. McTaggart) on 28 April, Official Report, c. 373–74, he will give figures to show the average level of earnings for men and women in the five-year period in terms of modal range.

    The information is set out in the following table.The objectives have been set in the following terms:OBJECTIVES FOR THE SCOTTISH ELECTRICITY BOARDS

    In accordance with their statutory obligations the primary duty of the Boards is to develop and maintain an efficient, coordinated and economic system for the secure supply of electricity to consumers in Scotland. In complying with this and their other statutory duties, there are a number of objectives which the Government wish the Boards to pursue.
  • 1. The Boards must ensure that their operations are carried through with maximum efficiency, paying close and continuing attention to the control and reduction of costs, including the setting of challenging cost control targets, and to the need to achieve the performance aims set by the Government. In this context, the Boards should keep under review the standards of service to which they operate. A plan should also be prepared for the matching of generating capacity (including any excess capacity) with expected demand in such a way that existing assets are used in the most efficient and economic way to minimise costs. In their dealings with suppliers the Boards should also aim to minimise their costs whilst maintaining adequate levels of stock and the security of supply of fuel and ancillary materials.
  • 2. In developing capital investment proposals the Boards' objective should be the supply of electricity at the lowest possible cost consistent with maintaining adequate standards and with the required rate of return on new Investment. The Boards should continue to set out their capital investment proposals comprehensively for approval by the Secretary of State, giving an account of the strategic framework against which these proposals have been developed. The Boards should also continue to pay close attention to the methodology used in appraising their capital investment proposals and this methodology should be agreed with the Scottish Economic Planning Department. Every effort should be made to ensure that all capital projects are completed on time and within budget. In particular, SSEB should ensure that Torness is commissioned successfully on time and within budget and, for their part, NSHEB should take all practicable steps to reduce the cost of diesel generation.
  • 3. The Boards' plans for efficient operation, and cost reducing investment, should be developed in the light of their annual discussions with the Government of a document reviewing the strategic options open to the Boards. This document should be submitted by 31 December each year in advance of the Investment and Financing Review. In preparing their plans, the Boards should aim to meet the financial targets and performance aims agreed with the Government and take full account of their external financing limits. The Boards should ensure regular and effective information flows to assist the Government to monitor performance in relation to those targets and limits.
  • 4. The Boards should, in consultation where appropriate with the Government, develop and promote a framework of electricity pricing principles within which the Boards set their prices so as to reflect the costs at the margin of meeting demand on a continuing basis, and so as to be consistent with the financial framework set by the Government. The Boards should pay careful attention to the costs of supplying different categories of consumers at different times, and the structure of the Boards' tariffs should be assessed against these costs.
  • 5. To increase the scope for competition and ensure the efficient use of resources, the Boards should consider the prospects for the injection of private investment into areas of the Boards' operations and make positive recommendations to the Government wherever possible. The Boards should also seek to develop co-operation with private generators, ensuring that adequate commercial and technical arrangements exist to take full economic advantage of their potential contribution to supply.
  • 6. Subject to objective 5. above, the Boards should seek to ensure that both their contracting and appliance retailing activities are carried out efficiently and economically so as to yield a proper return on the assets employed.
  • 7. The Boards should do all possible to explore and exploit to full potential of nuclear power to contribute to the cheap, effective and safe production of electricity, ensuring the maximum use of the nuclear power capacity presently available to the Boards and that currently under construction.
  • 8. The Boards should also encourage the conservation of electrical energy, the development of renewable sources of electricity, and economic schemes for combined heat and power and the use of surplus heat from power stations having regard, where appropriate, to the financial criteria applied by the Boards in relation to other expenditure.
  • 9. In their dealings with domestic consumers the Boards should comply with the provisions of the Electricity Supply Industry's Code of Practice on Disconnections.
  • 10. The conclusions and recommendations of the recent efficiency audits of both Boards should be discussed with SEPD and arrangements made for the implementation of those recommendations which are accepted. A report on the progress made in implementing these recommendations should be submitted to the Secretary of State before the end of 1984.
  • Either the Boards or the Government may propose revised or additional objectives from time to time, and any consequent adjustments to existing objectives would be a matter for discussion between the Boards and the Government. The Government may also wish to impose constraints from time to time, for wider reasons, on the Boards' ability to achieve one or other of these objectives.

    Prime Minister

    Engagements

    Q5.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q6.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q7.

    asked the Prime Minister what are her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q8.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q9.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q10.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will state her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q11.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q12.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q14.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q15.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q16.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q17.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q19.

    asked the Prime Minister whether she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q20.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q22.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q23.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q25.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q27.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q28.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q29.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q30.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q31.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q32.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q33.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q34.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q35.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q36.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q37.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q38.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q39.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q40.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q41.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q42.

    asked the Prime Minister what are her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q43.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q44.

    asked the Prime Minister whether she will state her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q46.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q47.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q48.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q50.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q51.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q52.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q53.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q54.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q55.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q57.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    Q58.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    Q59.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 12 May.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 May.

    This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in the House, I shall be having further meetings later today.

    British Isles Forum

    Q13.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will make it her policy to propose to the Taoiseach the setting up of a British Isles forum.

    There are already institutional arrangements under which meetings between United Kingdom Ministers and Ministers of the Irish Republic take place to discuss matters of common concern.

    Leith

    Q21.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will consider making an offical visit to Leith.

    European Community (Heads Of Government Meeting)

    Q24.

    asked the Prime Minister if she will make a statement setting out the main priorities for decision at the meeting of the European Community Council of Heads of Government meeting in early June.

    The last meeting of the European Council in March concluded that the Heads of Government would reach decisions in June on the future financing of the Community, including the solution for 1983 and later of the budget problem. Other major subjects for discussion set out in the conclusions were: the enlargement negotiations, youth employment, energy, research and development policy, completion of the internal market and certain environmental questions.

    Factory Closures

    Q26.

    asked the Prime Minister how many hon. Members she has met to discuss factory closures since she last answered oral questions; and how many jobs and factories were involved.

    European Council

    Q49.

    asked the Prime Minister when she next intends to meet her Common Market colleagues in the European Council.

    Republic Of Ireland (Nato)

    asked the Prime Minister whether the statement made by the Secretary of State for Defence regarding the Republic of Ireland's attitude to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation represents the policy of Her Majesty's Government.

    I assume that the hon. Member is referring to the remarks made by my right hon. Friend at the end of his visit to Northern Ireland. In commenting on the position of neutral states in Europe, he drew attention to the lessons of the 1939–45 war, and argued that the right course for the United Kingdom is to contribute to NATO. I readily affirm that it is the conviction of this Government that Europe's best defence rests with the NATO Alliance.

    Health And Social Security (Advice Offices)

    asked the Prime Minister if she will set up an interdepartmental working party to consider whether there should be an independent advice office in every local Department of Health and Social Security office.

    No, but the Department of Health and Social Security will continue to seek practical and effective ways of improving its own advice and information services, and the Government will be considering such services generally in the light of the recent report by the National Consumer Council.

    Local Authorities (Revenue)

    asked the Prime Minister what revenue totals were raised by local authorities in Scotland, England and Wales, respectively, in the last year for which figures are available.

    Latest estimates of revenue raised from rates by local authorities, excluding rate rebates and domestic rate relief grant — in Scotland, domestic element of rate support grant—in 1982–83 are as follows:

    £ million
    Scotland1,458
    England10,348
    Wales426

    Geoffrey Arthur Prime

    asked the Prime Minister whether she has received the report of the Security Commission on the case of Geoffrey Arthur Prime; and whether she will make a statement.

    In my statement to the House on 11 November 1982, I announced that, after consultation with the right hon. Gentleman the Leader of the Opposition, I had asked the Security Commission to investigate the circumstances in which breaches of security had, or might have, occurred arising out of the case of Geoffrey Arthur Prime, who was convicted on 10 November 1982 of offences under the Official Secrets Act 1911, and to advise in the light of that investigation whether any change in security arrangements was necessary or desirable.The commission has completed its task and submitted its report. I am most grateful to Lord Bridge of Harwich, Lord Justice Griffiths, Lord Allen of Abbeydale, and General Sir Hugh Beach for their work. I assured the House on 11 November that the commission's findings would be laid before the House to the fullest extent compatible with national security. A Command Paper is being published this afternoon. It contains the full text of the commission's report, but not the appendices to the report which contain classified information which it would not be in the public interest to publish.Prime was employed in the public service from 1956 to 1977, first in the Royal Air Force and subsequently, from 1968 to 1977, in Government Communications Headquarters—GCHQ. The functions of GCHQ, which are carried out under the ministerial responsibility of my right hon. Friend the Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary, are to ensure the security of the United Kingdom's military and official communications, and to provide signals intelligence in accordance with requirements laid upon it by the Government in support of the Government's defence and foreign policies. From 1968 to 1977, Prime worked on signals intelligence in GCHQ, and during that time and until November 1981 he passed a great deal of his knowledge of this most sensitive area to the Russians. There is no doubt that his disclosure caused exceptionally grave damage to the interests of this country and its allies.The commission says that there is no positive evidence to contradict Prime's statement that he acted alone. There have been intensive and extensive investigations, but no evidence had so far come to light to suggest that Prime had an accomplice or that the Soviet Union has, or had, another source of information within GCHQ. Nevertheless, investigations are continiung with a view to being as certain as possible on this point.Prime was first given positive vetting clearance by the RAF in 1966. During the time that Prime was spying for the Russians, his positive vetting status was reviewed four time, in 1968, 1973, 1974 and 1976, but on no occasion was any doubt cast on his reliability. The commission examined closely all these vetting clearances. They concluded that the fact Prime's espionage activities were not discovered was not attributable to any failure to operate the positive vetting procedures properly.In the course of the investigations that have taken place since Prime's trial, his first wife has disclosed that Prime confessed to her in 1973 that he was a spy. Her close friend, Miss Barsby, has admitted that the then Mrs. Prime reported this confession to her at that time. Neither woman came forward to denounce Prime. The then Mrs. Prime was not seen in the course of the subsequent PV investigations, but Miss Barsby was: indeed, Prime nominated her as one of his referees. Not only did she not volunteer her knowledge of Prime's confession but she took the positive step of telling the investigator who interviewed her that she had no reason to think Prime should not be entrusted with secret Government work. Had she acted differently, Prime's spying could have been brought to an end in 1973.The commission says that it can attach no blame to the investigation officer who carried out the 1973 review. The officer concerned is no longer living, but he seems from the records to have put all the relevant questions to Miss Barsby, and there appears to have been no reason why he should have suspected that Miss Barsby was deliberately lying to him, or should not have accepted her assurances as to Prime's character and reliability.One other matter which, if it had emerged during the PV review, might have resulted in Prime's clearance being withdrawn was the fact that he had consulted a psychiatrist in November 1972. The psychiatrist's report cast doubt on Prime's stability. Prime should have reported this visit under staff regulations but he did not do so, and GCHQ had no other means of finding out.The commission also identified weaknesses in physical and document security at GCHQ. In particular, it criticises the control of photocopying facilities at one period in the past and refers to infrequency of spot musters of particular documents. Tighter controls in this area would have been unlikely to lead to Prime being detected, but they might have restricted his activities.The commission recognises that personnel security measures, no matter how rigorous, can never provide an absolute guarantee against disloyalty. It has nevertheless recommended a number of measures to improve our defences. The Government accept the commission's recommendations, and will implement them as quickly as possible.Some of these recommendations fall within the framework of the existing security system. These cover;

    • —the wider use of random searches of staff leaving Government buildings where staff handle highly classified material in substantial quantities;
    • —more emphasis on the responsibility of managers for security supervision; and
    • —procedures for access, with the individual's consent, to medical records.

    These recommendations are of general application to all Government Departments and staff with access to highly classified information. The commission recommends that more radical screening procedures should be applied to staff in intelligence and security agencies with access to the most sensitive categories of information. These recommendations include;

    • —more rigorous standards for PV in those agencies;
    • —consideration of the introduction of psychological testing in security screening of applicants for employment in these agencies who would have access to information of the highest classification;
    • —the extension of PV investigations in relation to such applicants to include interviews with independent witnesses other than the referees named by the person to be vetted; and
    • —a pilot scheme to test the feasibility of polygraph security screening in the intelligence and security agencies.

    The commission concludes that the polygraph is the only measure of which it could be said with any confidence that it would have protected GCHQ from Prime's treachery, because it would either have deterred him from applying to join or could have exposed him in the course of examination. In view of this and of the extreme gravity of the damage caused by Prime, the Government accept the commission's recommendation that a full and thorough pilot scheme should be carried out. The commission recognises that a polygraph examination is generally regarded as a disagreeable experience and would be seen by some as an unwarranted invasion of their privacy. But we are dealing with matters of the highest national security, and those who have access to the nation's most sensitive secrets must expect to be subject to the most rigorous vetting procedures. Moreover, the commission proposes that questioning under the polygraph should be limited to counter-intelligence examination—such as exposure to approaches by hostile intelligence services—and should not extend to questions of life-style, such as criminality, drug taking, sexual matters and financial affairs. It also recommends that in no case should a supposedly adverse polygraph indication be treated by itself as a ground to withhold clearance without independent confirmation from some other source. The Government are in full agreement with the commission that safeguards of this nature must be incorporated in the pilot scheme.

    All security procedures imply some degree of encroachment upon the rights and freedom of the individual. We have to decide how to strike the balance between those considerations and the need to protect national security, in laying down security procedures that will be as effective as possible within the limits of what is acceptable in a free and democratic society. In doing so we have to bear in mind that no system of security can be guaranteed to confer absolute protection. I believe that the commission's recommendations are reasonable, and I commend them to the House as necessary to strengthen the security arrangements which exist to protect our free and democratic society.

    Pay Review Bodies

    asked the Prime Minister if she will make a statement on the reports of the review bodies on the pay of the armed forces, the doctors and dentists and top salaries.

    asked the Prime Minister when she intends to announce the decision on the Doctors and Dentists Pay Review Body; and if she will be accepting the recommendations of the board.

    The reports of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body, the Doctors' and Dentists' Review Body and the Top Salaries Review Body on certain top salary groups and on parliamentary pay and allowances have been laid before the House today and will be published as Command Papers shortly. Copies are now available in the Vote Office. The Government are grateful to the members of the review bodies for these reports and for the time and care which they have put into their preparation.The report of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body recommends new rates of pay for service men and women applicable from 1 April 1983 which will add 7·2 per cent. to the estimated pay bill for 1983–84.The Government accept the report, and the necessary steps to implement the new rates of pay, and inform service men of the details of the report, will be taken as soon as possible.The report of the Doctors' and Dentists' Review Body recommends with effect from 1 April 1983 increases in the pay of doctors and dentists which the review body estimates would add 6 per cent. to the pay bill over and above the costs of implementing in full its recommendations for 1 April 1982; in addition it recommends changes in certain supplementary payments to take account of the hours worked by junior hospital doctors and dentists, which will add a further 1 per cent. to the total pay bill.The House will recall that since 1981 there has been an abatement of the review body's recommendations for doctors and dentists which now amounts to 2·7 per cent. of the pay bill. The review body has strongly urged that this abatement should now be made good. The Government accept the recommended increases for this year with effect from 1 April 1983. It proposes to make good the abatement with effect from 1 January 1984.The scales and rates resulting from these decisions will be promulgated as soon as possible.The two reports from the Top Salaries Review Body, one dealing with the salaries of the higher Civil Service, senior officers in the armed forces and the judiciary, and the other dealing with the salaries of Members of Parliament and of Ministers and other office holders and parliamentary allowances, will be for consideration after the election.So far as the proposed salaries for Cabinet Ministers are concerned, members of the Cabinet take the view that the increases proposed are of a magnitude which they could not possibly accept, and trust that Members of Parliament will take a similar view about recommendations affecting their own salaries. The Government believe that any decisions which are reached in the new Parliament about resettlement arrangements should apply also to Members of the present Parliament in relation to their present salaries. The Government acknowledge the need to consult opinion widely before the House reaches a conclusion on the recommendations.

    Cruise Missiles

    asked the Prime Minister whether she will make a further statement with respect to the arrangements for joint control of cruise missiles in the event of their deployment in the United Kingdom.

    The existing understandings between the United Kingdom and the United States governing the use by the United States of nuclear weapons and bases in this country have been jointly reviewed in the light of the planned deployment of cruise missiles. We are satisfied that they are effective. The arrangements will apply to United States cruise missiles based in the United Kingdom whether on or off bases. The effect of the understandings and the arrangements for implementing them is that no nuclear weapon would be fired or launched from British territory without the agreement of the British Prime Minister.

    Overseas Development

    Public Opinion (Survey)

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether his Department has recently sponsored any survey of public opinion in the United Kingdom towards overseas aid; and if he will make a statement.

    A public opinion poll sponsored by the Overseas Development Administration and commissioned by the Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys, was recently undertaken as part of a Gallup poll omnibus survey. The fieldwork was done in January 1983 and based on a sample population of 1,862. I have placed copies of the results of the survey in the Library of both Houses.

    Population Projects

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what percentage of gross public expenditure on overseas aid was represented by expenditure on population projects in each of the financial years from 1976–77 to the latest available date.

    As I explained to the hon. Member on 28 Aprilߞ[Vol. 41, c. 408]—population aid statistics are compiled on a calendar year basis. In 1976, population projects represented about 0·8 per cent. of gross public expenditure on overseas aid; in 1977—0·9 per cent; in 1978 and 1979—1·0 per cent; 1980—0·9 per cent; and in 1981—0·6 per cent.

    Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs

    Spain And Portugal

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the state of negotiations on each of the main dossiers relating to the accession of Spain and Portugal to the European Community.

    The information for which my hon. Friend asked is set out in the following table:

    ChapterPortugalSpain
    Capital MovementsAgreed in fullAgreed in full
    TransportAgreed in fullAgreed in full
    Regional PolicyAgreed in fullAgreed in full
    EuratomAgreed in fullTo be negotiated
    Rights of EstablishmentSubstantially agreedAgreed in full
    EcofinSubstantially agreedSubstantially agreed
    TaxationSubstantially agreedGood progress
    Customs UnionSubstantially agreedGood progress
    ECSCSubstantially agreedGood progress
    External RelationsSubstantially agreedGood progress
    Harmonisation of LawsIn progressSubstantially agreed
    Social AffairsIn progressTo be negotiated
    AgricultureTo be negotiatedTo be negotiated
    FisheriesTo be negotiatedTo be negotiated
    Own ResourcesTo be negotiatedTo be negotiated
    InstitutionsTo be negotiatedTo be negotiated

    Republic Of Ireland

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether he will make a statement on the official complaint made by the Government of the Republic of Ireland at the United Kingdom's condemnation of the Republic's attitude to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation; and what reply Her Majesty's Government have sent or intend sending to the Government of the Republic of Ireland.

    The Irish authorities have been left in no doubt of the Government's position on this question.

    Zimbabwe

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent representations he has made to the Government of Zimbabwe about the detention and treatment of those members of the Zimbabwe air force accused of sabotage who are British passport holders; and if he will make a statement about their state of health and the opportunity for their families and his officials to visit them.

    We have already made clear to the Zimbabwe Government at the highest level our concern about earlier allegations of ill-treatment and our hope that these men would be brought to trial soon. I understand that the trial is now due to take place later this month.We do not have the right of consular access as, although some of the men concurrently hold British citizenship, all are Zimbabwean citizens. However we understand that they are being properly treated and are in a reasonable state of health, and that wives are allowed to visit their husbands once a week.

    Iran-Iraq War

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether he will give details of any representations which Her Majesty's Government have made to the Governments of Iran and Iraq regarding the continuing severe loss of life in the war between those countries; and if there have been any occasions when the United Kingdom, as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has requested a meeting of the Security Council to seek a resolution of this conflict.

    We want to see an early end to the war and to avoid further loss of life, injury and material destruction. We have made this clear to both sides. The Security Council has met three times to discuss the war at the request of countries other than the United Kingdom. We have been and still are active at the United Nations in trying to find ways of achieving a cease-fire and a realistic settlement.

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether he will list the United Nations Security Council resolutions currently in place which call for an immediate cease-fire in the war between Iran and Iraq; and what action Her Majesty's Government, as a permanent member of the Security Council, are taking to bring about the implementation of any existing resolutions or the passage of any new one.

    The United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 479 in 1980 and Resolutions 514 and 522 in 1982 on the war between Iran and Iraq. The United Kingdom voted in favour of all three. Both parties should in our view be willing to set aside their real grievances in the interests of reaching a negotiated settlement as soon as possible.

    1979–801980–811981–821982–83April 1983
    £££££
    (A) total drink/drive publicity expenditure1,252,8001,754,7001,282,7501,499,2505,600
    (B) total road safety publicity expenditure5,616,9005,142,1005,016,500*4,442,300*550,O00
    percentagepercentagepercentagepercentage
    (C) (A) as percentage of (B)22·334·125·633·7

    Sporting Activities (Patronage)

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is his policy towards the patronage of local sporting activities by Her Majesty's High Commissioners in Commonwealth countries; and if he will make a statement.

    There are no general rules laid down in this area. Where cases arise, they would normally be considered on their merits.

    Monsignor Bruce Kent

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he or Ministers or officials in his Department have discussed with Cardinal Hume or any other senior churchman the involvement of Monsignor Bruce Kent or any other churchman in the activities of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.

    Endangered Species Convention (Hong Kong)

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether Her Majesty's Government have signed the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species on behalf of the Hong Kong Government; and if he will make a statement.

    The United Kingdom signed the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora on 3 March 1973. The signature was deemed to have included all the territories for whose foreign relations Her Majesty's Government was responsible. Hong Kong was included in Her Majesty's Government's ratification of the Convention on 2 August 1976.

    Transport

    Drink-Drive Campaigns

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he will set out in the Official Report the total expenditure for publicity on the drink and drive campaigns undertaken by his Department for each of the following financial years; 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82 and 1982–83; how much has been spent to date in the financial year 1983–84 and how much is budgeted for the current year; what was the total expenditure by his Department for each of the years concerned; and what percentage the publicity expenditure on the drink and drive campaigns represented of that total expenditure.

    *Estimated.

    The allocation for anti-drink/drive publicity in 1983–84 is £1,600,000.
    The total road safety publicity budget for 1983–84 is £5,583,700.
    †Percentage would be meaningless, as concentration of early summer months spend is on child pedestrian safety.

    Seat Belts

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport what has been the total expenditure on the advertising campaign relating to seat belts undertaken by his Department in each year from 1979–80 to 1982–83; how much has been spent so far in 1983–84; how much is

    1979–801980–811981–821982–83April 1983
    £££££
    (a) total seat belt publicity expenditure1,758,200341,5001,584,450*689,950Nil
    (b) total road safety publicity expenditure5,616,9005,142,1005,016,500*4,442,300*550,000
    percentagepercentagepercentagepercentagepercentage
    (c) (a) as percentage of (b)31·36·631·615·5Nil
    *Estimated.
    There is no allocation for seat belt publicity in 1983–84. The road safety publicity budget for 1983–84 is £5,583,700.

    Mersey Docks And Harbour Company (Debt)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport by how much he intends to reduce Mersey Docks and Harbour Company's debt to the Government under the terms of the Ports (Reduction of Debt) Act 1983.

    In the light of the further detailed work carried out by my consultant accountants, Messrs Peat, Marwick, Mitchell, and after discussions with the company, I have decided to write off loans for which the outstanding principal amounted to £30 million at 1 January this year.

    Roads Programme

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he has completed the longer term review of the road programme promised in "Roads; England 1982".

    Over recent months, we have been reviewing the prospects for the trunk road programme in the light of the excellent progress made recently. The results of this review are set out in a statement I am publishing today, copies of which are being placed in the Library and the Vote Office.Completion of the present programme will come close to ensuring that, by the early 1990s, the trunk roads provide a national system of longer distance routes able to meet the needs of traffic to the end of the century and beyond, and to keep through traffic, including heavy lorries, out of built-up areas where it has no business. But gaps would need to be filled, and more towns to be bypassed. I am, therefore, adding over 40 new schemes to the active programme, and putting in hand studies of certain other problems. Details are set out in the statement.But trunk roads are only part of the road system as a whole. Work continues, and will be reported to Parliament, on the needs of the rest of the primary route network which are to be discussed further with the local authority associations, on the needs of the major urban areas generally and London in particular, and on what this

    budgeted for the current year; what was the total expenditure of his Department for each of the years concerned; and what percentage this publicity expenditure represented of that total expenditure.

    The information requested on road safety publicity expenditure is as follows:may imply for the balance of expenditure in the longer term between trunk and local roads and between new construction and maintenance.

    Imported Cars (Type Approval Information)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport what progress he has made in his discussions with the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders about arrangements for importers of cars to have prompt access to type approval information.

    I have agreed a voluntary code of practice with the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders under which type approval information will be provided, by manufacturers, to individuals and independent traders importing cars. This is designed to help overcome difficulties when licensing such imported cars for the first time.The Government are concerned to ensure that all vehicles used in this country meet our safety and environmental standards through compliance with the appropriate type approval requirements. But it is also anxious that the purchasers' choice of supply should not be impeded. The arrangements set out in the code of practice are designed to enable both these goals to be achieved.The code will operate from 31 May on a trial basis and will be reviewed in conjunction with the SMMT towards the end of the year.When I am satisfied that these new arrangements are working effectively and will continue to do so, I will review the terms of the personal import exemption from national type approval.

    Severn Bridge

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he has received the final consultants report on the Severn bridge; and if he will make a statment.

    My hon. Friend told the House last November that we had received the interim report from the consulting engineers, the Flint and Neill Partnership, who had been appointed to consider strategies for strengthening the Severn bridge and the other parts of the Severn crossing. We have now received the final report from Flint and Neill and I am placing copies in the House of Commons Library.I am glad to be able to inform the House that the report confirms that it will be technically feasible to strengthen the crossing so that it can carry, without restrictions on the flow of traffic, considerably higher loads than at present.The report puts forward alternative engineering options for achieving a higher loading standard. They will have to be evaluated and examined in detail. That work will proceed at once.

    Coastal Storage And Transportation (Control)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he has completed his review of arrangements for dealing with proposals to moor large vessels in coastal waters for storage and transportation purposes.

    Last year, following widespread concern over a proposal to moor a large tanker in the Solent for the storage and transhipment of liquefied petroleum gas, the Prime Minister asked me to consider with colleagues whether there was any scope for improving the present arrangements for dealing with such developments.A working party of officials has now completed a review of the present administrative and statutory controls. Copies of its report have been placed in the Library. It confirms that existing arrangements need strengthening to deal with this new type of industrial development. Legislation is recommended to establish new controls over offshore industrial projects of the kind which already apply to similar developments on land. Such controls would enable the environmental and amenity aspects to be taken into account, and bring the procedures for consideration within ministerial control. New administrative arrangements are recommended to deal with any cases that may arise in the meantime.The Government broadly endorse the working party's recommendation. In particular, they accept, in principle, that new statutory powers will be needed and that the Department of Trade should take the lead in preparing the necessary legislation. The form of the new controls will need careful consideration to avoid overlap with existing provisions, and this will necessarily take time. The Government therefore accept that improved administrative arrangements are needed in the meantime. The new procedures, within the framework of existing legislation, recommended in the report will be put into effect forthwith and will be co-ordinated by the Department of Trade.

    Cycle Schemes

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list the cycle schemes which his Department has financed in each local authority area; how much Government funds have been made available; how much local authority money is involved in each scheme; and what is the distance of each cycle provision made.

    The Department funds directly the innovative elements of local authority cycle schemes. Any associated local authority expenditure is eligible for support through transport supplementary grant, but details of such expenditure are not recorded centrally. The Department's expenditure up to 31 March 1983 was as follows:

    County and Scheme

    Department of Transport funding

    Length

    £

    km.

    Bedfordshire

    Bedford, Fenlake cycle route9,3601·8

    Cambridgeshire

    Cambridge, Trumpington Road1,5001·7
    Cambridge, Huntingdon Road3,0002·3
    Cambridge, Downing Street/ Pembroke Street5,0000·4
    Cambridge, Fen Causeway crossing13,500
    Cambridge, Hills Road/Brooklands Avenue Junction20,200

    Cleveland

    Middlesbrough, Marton West Beck cycle route19,4286·0

    Derbyshire

    Derby, Central area cycle/bus lanes2,800

    Essex

    Chelmsford, Odeon4,824

    Greater London Council

    London, Albert Gate53,400

    Lancashire

    Preston, Ringway junction5,338

    North Yorkshire

    York, Fishergate Bar/Dixon Lane cycle route12,4250·3

    Nottinghamshire

    Nottingham, Clifton to City Centre cycle route34,1505·6

    Surrey

    Hersham, Barley Mow Roundabout1,204

    West Sussex

    Chichester, Northgate Gyratory14,300

    Cycle Tracks

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list the cycle tracks now available to the public on British Rail land, the cost of each scheme and the distance of each; and which other railway tracks are being considered for cycling provisions.

    The consultant responsible for our study of disused railways tells us that, in England, 36 conversions totalling 180 miles are now open to the public, that work is currently under way on 25 conversions totalling 83 miles, and that a further 67 conversions totalling 270 miles are being considered. Details of cost are not readily available, but other information about the conversions open to the public is as follows:

    Local AuthorityConversionLength (Miles)
    AvonBitton to Bath5
    Staple Hill to Bitton4
    BuckinghamshireWolverton to Newport Pagnell1
    CheshireWhitegate Way7

    Local Authority

    Conversion

    Length (Miles)

    Cornwall

    Wadebridge to Padstow6

    Cumbria

    Cumbria Cycleway2

    Derbyshire

    Tissington Trail12
    High Peak Trail16

    Devon

    Barnstaple to Braunton4

    Durham

    Derwent Way7
    Brandon to Bishop Auckland9
    Deemess Walkway7
    Waskerley Way9
    Lancaster Valley5

    East Sussex

    East Grinstead to Groombridge10

    Greater Manchester

    Whitworth Road1
    Altwood1
    Monton Green Walkway1

    Hertfordshire

    Cole Green Way4
    Ayot Green Way4
    St. Albans to Hatfield2
    Harpenden to Hemel Hempstead1

    Kent

    Whitstable1

    Leicestershire

    Great Central Railway1

    Lincolnshire

    Spa Trail3

    Norfolk

    Hellesdon to Attlebridge4
    Aysham to Stalham10

    North Yorkshire

    Scarborough to High Hawsker19

    Oxfordshire

    Banbury Mineral Railway1
    Cycle Track

    Staffordshire

    Manifold Trail8

    Tyne and Wear

    Newburn Cycleway1

    West Midlands

    West Bromwich Parkway3
    Kingswinford Branch3
    Dudley to Priestfield1

    West Sussex

    Worthway5

    Wiltshire

    Swindon Old Town to Toothill2

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many miles of cycle tracks are now available in London and Greater London; and what plans there are for extending cycle provisions through and around the London and Greater London parks.

    Lengths of cycle track have been provided in the past alongside a number of trunk roads in London, but only a few miles are reserved exclusively for use by cyclists. The needs of cyclists are now considered during the preparation of all new trunk road schemes.Provision of other cycle schemes in London is the responsibility of the Greater London council and the London boroughs, and details are not available in the Department. However, we are funding innovaative elements of the GLC's ambassador route at Albert gate and Albion gate.

    Serpell Report

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he is now in a position to respond to the various options proposed for the future of British Rail in the Serpell report; and if he will make a statement.

    The Serpell report presented broad illustrations about the cost of the rail network, not policy options. The report also identified scope for substantial cost savings while keeping the railway at broadly its present size. So the future of a modern and efficient railway does not mean providing ever increasing subsidies from the taxpayer. Nor does it require embarking on a major programme of route closures; and the Government do not intend to do so.

    Railway Wagons

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member for Wood Green on 15 March, Official Report, c. 105, how many of the wagons specified were built, or are planned to be built, outside the United Kingdom.

    Of the 428 new wagons referred to in that reply, one order for 25 wagons was placed outside the United Kingdom.Contracts are placed by the grant applicant, not the Government, and I cannot forecast the source of wagons not yet ordered.

    Volvo Cars (Investigations)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transort whether he will make a statement on the progress of investigations into apparent faults on the automatic transmission of certain Volvos 343 and 345; and whether, until the problem is cleared and his investigation proves that no danger or damage to the public or drivers of these vehicles is involved, he will seek to make a temporary order banning these vehicles from the public highway.

    My Department is investigating the allegation that Volvo 300 series cars fitted with automatic transmission can move off from rest at an uncontrolled speed. The investigation is being carried out in co-operation with Volvo Car Concessonaires Ltd., the Motor Industry Research Association and Volvo BV, the Dutch manufacturers. As yet no cause for these cars behaving in this way has been identified, but the investigations are being pursued as quickly as possible.

    House Of Commons

    Select Committees

    asked the Lord President of the Council if he will publish the Government's reply to the report of the Liaison Committee on the Select Committee system.

    The Government's reply, which was conveyed in a letter dated 27 April from me to my right hon. Friend the Member for Taunton (Mr. du Cann) as Chairman of the Liaison Committee was as follows:

    "I am writing to let you know the outcome of the consideration which Ministers have recently been giving to the recommendations made by the Liaison Committee in their First Report (Session 1982–83) on the select committee system. This report is acknowledged as a most valuable and comprehensive progress report on the work of the Departmental select committees since their establishment in 1979.
    It is noted that the Committee's principal conclusion is that the work of the new committees, whilst making great demands on Members, has 'considerably extended the range of the House's activity, strengthened its position relative to that of the Government, and deepened the quality of its debates'. The Committee's view confirms that of the Government that the Departmental committees have now established themselves as an important part of the general structure of Parliamentary scrutiny. The importance of the position they occupy in relation to Ministerial accountability to Parliament is indicated by the fact that there had by November 1982 been 190 Ministerial appearances before them.
    The Government recognise, furthermore, the significant part that has been played by the Liaison Committee itself in the achievements of the new select committee system; in facilitating co-ordination and the avoidance of overlap between select committee enquiries (paragraph 81); in encouraging the economic use of resources (paragraph 76); and generally in serving as a focal point for the consideration of matters affecting select committees as a whole. I am particularly pleased in this respect to see the references in the report to the productive exchanges which have taken place between the Committee and the Government, and with the House of Commons Commission. The Government share the Committee's view (paragraphs 83 and 84) that in order to help facilitate further co-ordination in the work of select committees it is desirable that individual committees should in future be able to show their evidence to other committees, and that they should be given the power to join with other committees in order to take evidence, deliberate or make reports. It is proposed to table the necessary amendments to Standing Orders in due course.
    The first six specific conclusions and recommendations made in the report (Paragraphs 24, 27, 40, 42, 33 and 39) all relate to various aspects of the structure of the select committee system. Of these recommendations it is proposed that two should be decided by a new Parliament—those relating to the question of whether the terms of reference of the Home Affairs Committee should be extended to include the Law Officers Department and the Lord Chancellor's Department (paragraph 24) and the proposed changes in sizes of membership of select committees (paragraph 33). It would also seem appropriate that, as I said recently in the House (OR, 30 March, 1983, cols. 396–7) with reference to the contrary recommendation made by the Select Committee on Standing Orders (Revision), any decision by the House with regard to the repeal of the sub-section of the Standing Order relating to the Nationalised Industries Sub-Committee (paragraph 40) should take account of the outcome of the Parliamentary Control of Expenditure (Reform) Bill now before the House. I have also noted the Committee's comments (paragraph 23) about the Industry and Trade Committee.
    The Committee also recommend (paragraph 39) that the House should have a further opportunity to decide whether more Departmental select committees should have the power to appoint a sub-committee. The Government fully recognise that this question must ultimately be for the House to decide. Their concern remains, however, to achieve the necessary balance between any further extensions of the select committee system at the present time and the Government's aim of maintaining strict control over the running costs of public administration, including manpower.
    The following two recommendations, those relating to paragraphs 48 and 50, refer to matters concerned with the submission of Government evidence to select committees. The first concerns the need for committees to be able to bring to the Floor of the House disputes between Ministers and select committees about the disclosure of information. The Government welcome the Committee's acknowledgement (paragraph 48) that the Government's commitment to make every effort to ensure that the fullest possible information is made available to the select committees has been satisfactorily honoured. For their part the Government are pleased to recognise the manner in which it has generally proved possible to reach agreement on these matters within the longstanding conventions that have applied in this field under successive administrations.
    Nevertheless, as the Committee point out, there is always the possibility of differences of opinion arising between Ministers and select committees as to whether it would be in the public interest for particular information to be disclosed. The Government recognise the importance of the undertaking they have given to seek to provide time on the Floor, if there should be evidence of widespread general concern in the House regarding an alleged Ministerial refusal to disclose information to a select committee.
    As regards the Committee's recommendation (paragraph 50) that the Central Policy Review Staff should inform the appropriate select committees of the conclusions they reach in their investigations, and should make available to committees the evidence they have gathered, the Government remain of the view that reports made by the CPRS are generally in the nature of confidential advice to Ministers, and that it would accordingly be contrary to the conventions applying to the disclosure of information to select committees for such reports to be made available to them.
    On a further matter relating to evidence to select committees, it would be wrong for me to pass over without comment the statement in paragraph 25 of the report that "one Government activity which already falls within the ambit of the Departmental select committees is the work of the security services". It is by no means clear to me that the security and intelligence agencies are to be regarded as being within the ambit of any of the Departmental select committees. Even, however, if it was accepted that they were to be so regarded, the Government's view is that the committees would be right to continue to refrain from inquiries in this field, for the reasons which the report indicates. As you know, there is a long-standing convention under which the Government do not provide information or answer questions in Parliament on matters of security and intelligence, and the Government would regard itself as bound by that convention in relation to Departmental select committees no less than in relation to Parliament itself.
    With regard to the other recommendations made in the report, the Government note the Committee's view (paragraph 58) that the House should make clear that it would not expect paired Members, who are absent abroad on select committee work, to break short visits in order to participate in a division. It is appreciated that the recall of Members in such circumstances can involve expense and the risk of apparent discourtesy. In some cases such recalls may be considered essential, but it is hoped that discussions through the usual channels can avoid this whenever possible.
    As regards the recommendation that the Government should give an undertaking that "more days will be made available for debates on select committee repors in future" (paragraph 65), this is clearly one aspect of the need to which the Committee attach cardinal importance and in which the Government fully concur —"that the House and its committee system should not work in isolation from each other". As the report recognises, however, it is by no means necessary that a select committee report should be specifically debated in order for it to be influential on the formation of views in the House or elsewhere or to provide the basis of informed debate.
    For example, the reports of the Foreign Affairs Committee on the British North America Acts were highly relevant to the debates on the Canada Act. Reports made by the Treasury and Civil Service Committee have been of great value to the House in the consideration of the Government's Public Expenditure White Papers; and reports by the Defence Committee have provided a similar background for debates on Defence expenditure.
    It would, in the Government's view, be inappropriate, in view of the pressures of other urgent matters on Parliamentary time, for time on the Floor to be allocated in advance each session to the debate of a fixed number of select committee reports. I would hope, however, that it may be possible in future to provide more time for such debates, especially when a report arouses particular interest.
    In respect of debates in the Scottish and Welsh Grand Committees, the Committee's suggestion that at least one day a session might usefully be devoted to debates on reports made by the Scottish Affairs and Welsh Affairs Committees has also been noted. The topics for debates in the Welsh Grand Committee and for Matter Day debates in the Scottish Grand Committee are at present decided following discussion between the Government and the Opposition. As the report acknowledges, however, on two occasions during 1982, when the Scottish Grand Committee debated youth unemployment and training, and road and sea transport, these debates were closely related to enquiries made by the Scottish Affairs Committee.
    The Government also note the view of a majority of the Committee that the work of select committees might, in certain circumstances, be considerably enhanced by being televised. The House gave leave to Mr. Austin Mitchell on 13 April, under the "10-minute rule" Bill procedure, to bring in a Bill for this purpose.
    Proposals for televising proceedings, whether on the Floor or in Committee, have been regarded by successive administrations as a House, rather than a Government, matter. But Members will no doubt wish to consider the Committee's majority view in the light of the progress of Mr. Mitchell's Bill, and assess whether they would wish the further consideration of this issue to be in the context of a further general debate on the televising of Parliamentary proceedings. If the House decided in principle in favour of the televising of proceedings, whether generally or only in respect of proceedings in select committees, a decision could then be taken as to whether the question of the method of implementation should be referred to the Committee on Sound Broadcasting.
    In conclusion, I recall that when the new system of select comittees was first established the then Leader of the House, Norman St. John-Stevas, gave an undertaking that all Ministers would seek to make it a success, and to co-operate fully in the provision of official evidence. I would like to take the opportunity provided by this progress report to renew, on behalf of the Government, the observations made on that occasion.
    With regard to the future, it would seem clearly of great importance as emphasised in the report, that the work of the Departmental select committees should, wherever possible, be integrated with the other work of the House and with other procedural changes aimed at strengthening Parliamentary powers of scrutiny. The part which select committees are able to play in relation to the new "Estimates Days", and other changes designated to strengthen Parliamentary control over expenditure, will no doubt be significant in this respect.
    I noted some time ago a comment quoted in a review of the new select committee system by the Outer Circle Policy Unit that "nowhere else are Ministers and their senior civil servants questioned so closely and so publicly about their activities; or their replies evaluated so critically". It is clearly of the highest importance to the House that this reputation is maintained and enhanced.

    Northern Ireland

    Political Developments

    1.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will consider approaching the major political parties of the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland to discuss the developing situation in Northern Ireland.

    I am always ready to discuss developments in Northern Ireland with representatives of the constitutional parties in the United Kingdom. I am also happy to explain Government policy to representatives of such parties from the Republic of Ireland and to hear their views. But I must emphasise that the constitutional future of Northern Ireland is a matter for the people of Northern Ireland, and the Government and Parliament of the United Kingdom.

    Kinsale Gas

    2.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland when he expects to reach an agreement with the Republic of Ireland Government concerning the piping of Kinsale gas to Northern Ireland.

    Negotiations between the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland Government on the terms of a supply of Kinsale natural gas to Northern Ireland have been continuing during recent weeks. Both parties have been faced with areas of real difficulty, but I very much hope that negotiations will be concluded one way or the other as soon as possible.

    Substandard Housing

    6.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many houses are currently classed as substandard in Northern Ireland.

    The house condition survey 1979 indicated that 142,588 dwellings required substantial repair, improvement or renewal.

    Labour Statistics

    9.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many young people between the ages of 16 and 18 years were unemployed in Northern Ireland at the latest available date.

    At 14 April 1983 there were 13,614 unemployed claimants in Northern Ireland between the ages of 16 and 18 years inclusive.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement on the latest unemployment figures in the Province.

    At 14 April 1983 there were 116,373 unemployed claimants in Northern Ireland, which was 20·9 per cent. of all employees. That was an increase of 2,704 since last month, accounted for in part by the influx of Easter school leavers.

    Finance Allocation

    10.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what are the principal reasons that led Her Majesty's Government to decide on the level of allocation of moneys to Northern Ireland which do not apply to the rest of the United Kingdom.

    The public expenditure allocation for Northern Ireland is decided as part of the annual public expenditure survey. The allocation is a positive response to Northern Ireland's special needs, which are a unique combination of social and economic disadvantages coupled with a necessarily high expenditure on law and order.

    Management Development Programme

    17.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he has any plans to review the range of aids available under the management development programme in Northern Ireland.

    It is hoped to expand the scope of the management development programme later this year and the programme is also under review to determine whether any modification in its application to particular sectors might be desirable.

    Improvement Grants

    21.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he has any plans to relax the floor area conditions for dwellings on which improvement grants are being paid.

    Security

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement on the security situation in Northern Ireland.

    I refer the hon. Gentleman to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Basildon (Mr. Proctor) earlier today.

    Deputy Returning Officers

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland whether he has reconsidered the rules governing the appointment of town clerks as deputy returning officers in district council elections as promised in a letter dated 4 January 1982 to Mr. Austin Currie; and whether he is satisfied that deputy returning officers will now be prevented from participating in fund-raising functions for political parties in Northern Ireland.

    I am keeping these matters under review, but I have no immediate plans to change the law governing the appointment of deputy returning officers for elections to district councils.Deputy returning officers are responsible to the Chief Electoral Officer. Total impartiality is required from them in the performance of their duties.

    Teachers

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many (a) primary and (b) secondary school teachers have been made redundant in Northern Ireland since 1979.

    The information is not readily available in the form requested, but redundancy payments were made to 332 primary school teachers and 158 secondary school teachers in the school years 1978–79 to 1981–82.

    Elections (Identification System)

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland whether her Majesty's Government have any plans to introduce a formal system of identification for elections in Northern Ireland in the light of high incidence of impersonation.

    It is not practicable to introduce such a system in advance of the general election. It would require amendment of the Representation of the People Act 1983. But this issue will be kept under close and continuing review.

    Pupils (Travel Assistance)

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many qualifying children from the catchment area of Lurgan college have been granted assistance to travel to grammar schools outside that area during the years 1980 to 1982; and what has been the estimated total cost each year.

    The information is as follows:

    YearNumber of childrenCost of Travel £
    1980182,018
    1981222,716
    1982273,340

    Rivers Roe And Owenreagh (Restocking)

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what progress has been made in restocking the river Roe and river Owenreagh; how many fish, of which species, sizes and ages, have been involved; what has been the cost of (a) the restocking and (b) the monitoring of other living creatures in these rivers; and if he will make a statement.

    The following fish stocks have been placed in these rivers since 1 January 1983:

    Number
    Salmon
    Eyed Ova118,000
    Under 1 year old40,000
    Over 1 year old30,000
    Brown Trout
    Under 1 year old20,000
    Over 2 years old400
    Subject to agreement with local angling interests a further 4,000 brown trout are available for stocking in the near future.The cost of restocking to date has been £29,255.The cost of monitoring other aquatic life in these rivers since 11 September 1982 has amounted to approximately £2,300.The effects of the restocking will be reviewed over the 1984, 1985 and 1986 seasons.

    Terrorism

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will publish figures for each month from 4 May 1979 to 4 May 1983 showing the number and type of terrorist incidents which occurred in Northern Ireland.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will publish a table in the Official Report showing the number and type of terrorist incidents which occurred in Northern Ireland between 4 May 1979 and 31 August 1981 and 1 September 1981 and 4 May 1983 or for the nearest equivalent period.

    Information is not readily available in the form requested, but the following relates to approximately equivalent periods.

    Incidents1 July 1979 to 30 June 19811 July 1981 to 31 December 1982
    Shooting incidents1,411796
    Explosions674389
    Bombs neutralised258174
    Armed robberies881911
    Malicious firesNot available974
    Deaths
    Civilian10887
    Army/UDR6336
    RUC/RUC 'R'2521
    Injuries
    Civilian1,420753
    Army/UDR243169
    RUC/RUC 'R'486223

    Land Classification (Maps)

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland whether any large scale maps of land classification have been published for Northern Ireland by his Department.

    Less Favoured Areas (Ordnance Survey Map)

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will issue an ordnance survey map of six inches to the mile scale or equivalent, showing the boundary line he proposes between the less favoured areas of Northern Ireland and the rest of Northern Ireland.

    No; 1 inch to the mile maps are available for inspection at county agricultural executive offices.

    Coal

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what is the current level of consumption of coal in Northern Ireland.

    Youth Community Project

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will list the youth community projects presently in operation in county Armagh and identify the sponsoring groups.

    The following organisations are operating youth community projects in county Armagh:

    • Lurgan—
      • Craigavon area hospital
      • Phoenix youth centre
      • Shankill community Association
    • Portadown—
      • Portadown YMCA.
    In addition, the following projects have been approved:

    • Armagh—
      • Northern Ireland Association for the Care and Rehabilitation of Offenders
      • Armagh city hospital.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how the figure of 800 places allocated to youth community projects in Northern Ireland was calculated; and how many places have been taken up.

    The target figure of 800 full-time training places represents the maximum which can be developed within the resources presently available to the scheme. To date some 590 places have been allocated to sponsors and proposals for a further 175 places are currently under consideration.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will list the allocation of the 800 places on youth community projects by each travel-to-work area in Northern Ireland; and in how many areas the complement has been taken up.

    The allocation of YCP places in travel-to-work areas is as follows:

    Travel-to-work areaYCP allocation
    Belfast305
    Antrim33
    Armagh14
    Ballymena27
    Ballymoney18
    Ballynahinch6

    Travel-to-work area

    YCP allocation

    Banbridge16
    Bangor17
    Carrickfergus24
    Coleraine24
    Cookstown12
    Downpatrick6
    Dungannon15
    Enniskillen16
    Kilkeel3
    Larne18
    Limavady17
    Lisburn30
    Londonerry62
    Lurgan21
    Magherafelt18
    Newcastle3
    Newtownards20
    Newry25
    Omagh14
    Portadown14
    Strabane22

    The complement has been taken up in three areas:

    • Londonderry
    • Lurgan
    • Kilkeel

    In four other areas—Armagh, Enniskillen, Omagh and Portadown—there are sufficient approved places to meet the target figures. Development work to achieve target figures in the remaining areas is being actively pursued.

    Census

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many of the persons who refused to complete their census return forms in the 1981 census were prosecuted for failure to complete such forms; what percentage this is of the total who did not comply with the legal requirements; what were the sentences passed; and in how many remaining cases legal proceedings are in progress.

    [pursuant to his reply, 6 May 1983, c. 167–68]; None. The Government's overriding consideration is to make the census as comprehensive as possible. Difficulties in taking the census prevented many people making returns at the appropriate time. In these circumstances it was decided to give all house-holders who had not made returns ample opportunity to do so. This approach has been successful and the number of outstanding returns was reduced from 65,000 in April 1981 to 5,971 by May 1982; in only 1,006 of these cases was there refusal to complete a return. Until the follow-up was completed it was not possible to identify those who genuinely intended to make returns and those who did not. Prosecution of those who did not is now time barred.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (1) how many persons in Northern Ireland refused to complete their census returns at the 1981 census;(2) how many persons in each council area in Northern Ireland refused to complete their census forms in the 1981 census.

    [pursuant to his reply, 6 May 1983, c. 167–68]; 1,006 persons refused to complete their census forms. The numbers in each district council area were:

    Area

    Number

    Antrim23
    Ards2
    Armagh12
    Ballymena5
    Ballymoney8
    Banbridge1
    Belfast533
    Carrickfergus1
    Castlereagh6
    Coleraine7
    Cookstown38
    Craigavon4
    Down10
    Dungannon39
    Fermanagh18
    Larne
    Limavady18
    Lisburn47
    Londonderry75
    Magherafelt34
    Moyle2
    Newry and Mourne52
    Newtownabbey9
    North Down2
    Omagh39
    Strabane21
    1,006

    Environment

    House Condition Survey

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what proportion of (a) all dwellings inspected and (b) dwellings judged to be unfit during the 1981 English house condition survey were visited by (i) environment health officers and (ii) private sector surveyors.

    51 per cent. of the dwellings inspected were visited by environmental health officers and 49 per cent. by private sector surveyors. Of the dwellings judged to be unfit 62 per cent. were visited by environmental health officers and 38 per cent. were visited by private surveyors.

    Industrialised And System-Built Dwellings

    asked the Secretary of the State for the Environment how many systems of industrialised dwellings have been developed by his Department or Government agencies; if he will name these systems; and whether any defects are presently associated with them.

    Government Departments and agencies have developed only a very limited number of housebuilding systems which have subsequently been put into production. The information readily available is as follows:

  • (a) A prefabricated aluminium bungalow was produced in substantial numbers by the aircraft industry under Government sponsorship at the end of the second world war; these subsequently encountered problems of corrosion;
  • (b) Early in the 1960s the Ministry of Housing and Local Government developed the 5M and 12M systems, the latter in collaboration with John Laing Construction Ltd. There were some problems with the cladding panels used in the 5M system, but, so far as is known, there have been no recent reports of defects inherent in the design of either system.
  • Local Authorities (Expenditure)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has anything to add to his reply of 21 December 1982, Official Report, c. 377–78, to the hon. Member for Norfolk, North West to the questions on local authority expenditure; and if he will make a statement.

    These data will be available shortly; and will be published by CIPFA in "Finance and General Statistics 1983–84" in the summer.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish the original planned level of (a) rate support grant current and (b) public expenditure survey current expenditure as implied by Cmnd. 7841, table 1.5, and paragraph 46 of part I (i) in November 1979 survey prices and (ii) at estimated outturn prices for 1980–81, 1981–82, 1982–83 and 1983–84 for local authorities in England.

    All available figures for planned local authorities' public expenditure were published in Cmnd. 7841. A comparison between RSG current and YES current expenditure was given in table 4.5 for the period 1974–75 to 1980–81, but was not available for later years. In March 1980 cash planning had not been introduced, and plans in cash were not available.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish the inflation factors which express the movement in pay and prices, overall, between November 1978 and November 1979 prices, November 1979 and November 1980 prices, November 1980 and November 1981 prices, November 1981 and November 1982 estimated prices and the implied November 1982 to November 1983 prices factor for rate support grant current expenditure for local authorities in England and Wales.

    Following are the changes in local authorities' pay and prices within net current expenditure (RSG basis):

    Price basesper cent.
    November 1978 to November 1979+14·9
    November 1979 to November 1980+24·5
    November 1980 to November 1981+10·1
    November 1981 to November 1982+6·7
    November 1982 to November 1983n/a

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what was the estimated outturn of local government capital expenditure in England in 1982–83; and what was the quarter by quarter total of capital expenditure from the start of the 1979–80 financial year to the end of 1982–83.

    Following is the readily available information:

    Gross capital expenditure £ millionGross capital receipts £ millionNet capital expenditure £ million
    1981–82
    First quarter777269508
    Second quarter932352580
    Third quarter925345580
    Fourth quarter1,283445838

    Gross capital expenditure £ million

    Gross capital receipts £ million

    Net capital expenditure £ million

    1982–83
    First quarter722412310
    Second quarter899468431
    Third quarter1,093521572

    The information is based on the capital payments returns. It excludes law and order services but includes housing association grants. Returns for the January to March 1983 quarter are not yet available.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish his Department's best estimate of the total of local authority total expenditure in 1983–84, the total of estimated holdback consistent with 1983–84 original budgets and the estimated level of clawback.

    Budgeted total expenditure for 1983–84 by local authorities in England is £20,905 million; the estimated total of grant holdback consistent with these budgets, but before taking account of exempted urban programme expenditure, is £289 million. There will be no clawback of grant this year; the total of grant claims—before holdback—is £57 million less than the total block grant available for distribution. Accordingly, a positive close ending adjustment to grant claims is being made. Initially, all grant claims will be increased by a factor of 1·006556. However, at the first supplementary report, the opportunity will be taken to reset the national poundage schedule.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish his best estimate of the outturn of local authority relevant expenditure in 1982–83 and of the total Exchequer grants, rate support grant, specific and supplementary grants, for that year.

    Following is the latest available information for local authorities in England for 1982–83:

    £ million
    Relevant expenditure21,718*
    Aggregate Exchequer grants:
    Rate support grants8,982†
    Specific and supplementary grants2,209*
    * Provisional estimate based on local authorities' revised estimates for 1982–83.
    † Domestic rate relief grant and block grant after holdback from the "Rate Support Grant Supplementary Report, (England) 1982–83".

    Anti-Litter Campaign

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will set out in the Official Report the total expenditure on publicity for the anti-litter campaign undertaken by his Department for each of the following financial years: 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82 and 1982–83; how much has been spent to date in the financial year 1983–84 and how much is budgeted for the current year; what was the total expenditure of his Department for each of the years concerned; and what percentage the publicity expenditure on the anti-litter campaign represented of that total expenditure.

    The Department makes an annual grant to the Keep Britain Tidy Group to support the national litter abatement campaign. The group determines the level of its expenditure on publicity and promotions, having regard to the extent to which contributions from other sources are earmarked for particular types of work. National promotions are normally arranged jointly by the group in association with major companies and voluntary organisations which share the costs involved. The grants made in the financial years referred to were as follows —except as indicated, no specific sums were earmarked for publicity purposes:

    £000
    1979–80275
    1980–81*250
    1981–82275
    1982–83†292
    * Plus an additional £30,000 for a poster campaign in the London area.
    † Plus a contribution of £50,000 to the "Beautiful Britain 1983" Campaign.
    I announced the amount of the grant proposed for 1983–84 in an answer today to my hon. Friend the Member for Carshalton (Mr. Forman).

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he is now in a position to increase his Department's grant to the Keep Britain Tidy group for 1983–84.

    I have now completed my review of the level of the Department's grant to the Keep Britain Tidy Group for 1983–84.I am concerned that the group should be able to increase its litter abatement work and I accept the desirability of the group increasing its promotional activities through an expansion of its regional organisation. The group estimates that its proposals to achieve such an expansion would require an increase in the grant for 1983–84 of £125,000 to a total of £525,000. As forecast in the answer to the hon. Member for Liverpool, West Derby (Mr. Ogden) on 27 April—[Vol. 41, c. 855–56]—I have been considering increasing the grant and I am now prepared to make available the additional £125,000, subject to the normal scrutiny of the expenditure involved. Such an increase would be offset by savings elsewhere in Class VII 2 and does not involve any increase in the planned total of public expenditure.I have asked the group to renew its efforts to obtain increased financial sponsorship from the private sector.

    Derelict Land

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how much private sector investment on current plans will be generated by derelict land grant approvals under the new category A scheme introduced in 1982–83.

    In 1982–83 I approved 33 category A schemes involving local authority expenditure of £15 million, which will lead to private sector expenditure on development totalling some £81 million, a ratio of 1:5 of public to private sector funds. For 1983–84 I have approved 46 schemes involving £30 million of local authority expenditure, which will lead to some £200 million of private sector investment, a ratio of over 1:6; I placed details of those schemes in the Library on 15 February.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will set out in the Official Report the total derelict land grant programme allocations for each year from 1979–80 to date; and if he will break this down by region.

    The amount allocated for approved derelict land reclamation schemes for the years in question was:

    Region1979–801980–811981–821982–831983–84
    £ million£ million£ million£ million£ million
    Northern6·47·56·56·510·0
    North West6·28·113·016·1*30·75
    Yorkshire and Humberside2·72·93·73·45·0
    West Midlands4·55·15·46·912·25
    East Midlands1·82·54·06·97·5
    South West0·40·40·50·51·0
    London1·22·83·54·26·0
    South East and East Anglia0·30·30·30·20·5
    Total23·529·636·944·773·0
    * This includes a special provision of £10 million for reclamation on Merseyside.
    Allocations of the funds available for non-local authority schemes were not regionally allocated.

    Urban Development

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list partnership and programme authorities and districts designated under the Inner Urban Areas Act 1978; together with details on an annual basis from 1980–81 to 1983–84 of the resources allocated to them.

    Total urban programme resources for the years in question were £ 202 million, £ 215 million, £ 305

    Urban Programme Resources (England) 1980–81—1983–84
    Allocations in £ million, cash
    1980–811981–821982–831983–84Total 1980–81 to 1983–84
    Partnerships (1)
    Birmingham17·316·925·724·184·0
    Docklands*26·228·317·08·079·5
    Hackney15·415·010·3511·0
    Islington10·3510·472·5
    Lambeth9·09·212·513·544·2
    Liverpool17·617·626·824·186·1
    Manchester/Salford17·516·824·124·582·9
    Newcastle/Gateshead12·914·021·018·065·9
    Programme Authorities (1)(2)
    Blackburn†0·340·540·781·092·75
    Bolton2·112·563·673·3911·73
    Bradford3·333·126·24·1816·83
    Brent†0·350·651·551·584·13
    Coventry‡0·140·210·851·182·38
    Hammersmith and Fulham3·334·275·325·6318·55
    Hull2·623·404·44·4714·89
    Knowsley‡0·150·470·371·252·24
    Leeds3·563·755·14·1316·54
    Leicester3·834·166·55·4319·92
    Middlesbrough2·713·435·44·6216·16
    Nottingham3·413·755·44·8517·41
    Oldham2·432·853·83·6612·74
    Rochdale†0·550·931·462·405·34

    £ million

    Local authority only1979–8023·5
    Local authority only1980–8129·6
    Including £644,000 for non-local authority schemes1981–8237·6
    Including £1 million for non-local authority schemes1982–8345·7
    Including £2 million for non-local authority schemes1983–8475·0

    The allocations for local authority expenditure in each region were:

    million, and £348 million within those figures. The UP resources allocated to partnership, programme authorities and other designated districts in England are shown in the following table. The figures for 1982–83 include the latest available estimate of the take-up of additional capital resources, following the invitation to bid for such resources issued to local authorities in October 1982. The 1983–84 allocations shown in the table will be increased by specific allocations for approved urban development grant projects, for which £60 million of the total urban programme resources for that year have been reserved.

    1980–81

    1981–82

    1982–83

    1983–84

    Total 1980–81 to 1983–84

    Sandwell†0·830·982·812·346·96
    Sheffield3·443·494·94·0115·84
    Sunderland2·602·683·43·1711·85
    Tower Hamlets||0·350·320·511·782·96
    North Tyneside2·252·343·023·1210·73
    South Tyneside2·512·995·33·9314·73
    Wandsworth†0·480·501·101·603·68
    Wirral2·672·794·23·6713·33
    Wolverhampton2·933·225·64·4416·19
    Other Designated Districts (1)(2)
    Barnsley0·400·501·290·883·07
    Bumley‡0·040·010·280·080·41
    Doncaster0·320·350·820·431·92
    Ealing0·250·350·900·712·21
    Greenwich||0·200·140·350·551·24
    Haringey0·290·761·440·873·36
    Hartlepool0·570·651·140·863·22
    Langbaurg‡0·020·250·27
    Lewisham||0·240·420·400·651·71
    Newham||0·210·320·760·571·86
    Rotherham0·280·710·900·782·67
    Sefton0·510·230·411·55
    Southward||0·330·370·650·551·90
    St. Helens0·410·410·970·492·28
    Walsall‡0·180·381·000·341·90
    Wigan0·620·601·170·462·85

    * The figure of Docklands includes only the resources of the former Docklands partnership.

    † Former other designated district—for years 1980–81 to 1982–83.
    ‡ New designation announced on 15 February 1983.
    || Allocations for projects outside the Docklands partnership area in 1980–81 and 1981–82, and outside the LDDC area in 1982–83 and 1983–84.

    Notes:

    (1) Figures include urban programme expenditure by metropolitan counties and in some cases health authorities in those areas.

    (2) Figures for other designated districts, newly designated authorities and programme authorities which were formerly other designated districts include allocations under the traditional urban programme for the appropriate years, but exclude urban programme resources received in those years for continuing projects approved under earlier traditional urban programme circulars.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the schemes approved under the urban aid programme, and the sums allocated for all projects completed, commenced or approved in the Carrick and Kerrier districts of Cornwall.

    Capital CostsRevenue Costs
    ££
    Carrick District Council
    1982Cornwall Youth Adventure Project (Holiday Project)1,975 (one year only)
    1983Cornwall Youth Adventure Project (Holiday Project)2,500 (one year only)
    Kerrier District Council
    1975–76Council for community service (playgroup, old persons club, commission on homelessness)900 (one year only)
    1981–82Redruth Community Centre7,914 (for 5 years)
    Cornwall County Council
    1971–72Fairfield Nursery School (Kerrier)31,058
    1980–81Redruth Youth and Community Centre (Kerrier)20,000
    1981–82Full time youth worker Redruth and District (Kerrier)7,770 (for 5 years)
    1981–82Workshop for 16+ ESN (M) and disadvantaged (Kerrier)100,000
    1982–83Extensions to Truro Nursery School (Carrick)33,000

    Enterprise Zones

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment in which local authorities enterprise zones have been established; and for which others firm proposals have been announced.

    Enterprise Zone and Local Authority/Authorities Corby

    • Corby District Council

    Dudley

    • Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

    Hartlepool

    • Hartlepool Borough Council

    Isle of Dogs

    • Tower Hamlets Borough Council
    • Newham Borough Council

    Newcastle/Gateshead

    • City of Newcastle upon Tyne
    • Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council

    Salford/Trafford

    • City of Salford
    • Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council

    Speke

    • Liverpool City Council

    Wakefield

    • Wakefield Metropolitan District Council

    In addition, the Government have announced its intention to establish further enterprise zones in England, as follows:

    Enterprize Zone and Local Authority/Authorities Middlesbrough

    • Middlesbrough Borough Council

    North East Lancashire

    • Burnley Borough Council
    • Hyndburn Borough Council
    • Pendle Borough Council
    • Rossendale Borough Council

    North West Kent

    • Gillingham Borough Council
    • Gravesham Borough Council
    • Rochester-upon-Medway City Council

    Rotherham

    • Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

    Scunthorpe

    • Scunthorpe Borough Council

    Telford

    • District of the Wrekin Council

    Wellingborough

    • Borough Council of Wellingborough

    Workington

    • Allerdale District Council

    I have now issued statutory invitations to all the above local authorities, with the exception of the district of the Wrekin council, to prepare schemes for the development of the new zones.

    Surplus Crown Land

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the practice of Her Majesty's Government for establishing the value of surplus Crown land prior to its disposal; and if he will make a statement.

    The understanding of successive Governments has been that it is not open to the Crown to seek a planning permission under the Town and Country Planning Acts in respect of Crown land in order to establish its value prior to disposal. That understanding has recently been confirmed by an opinion of the Law Officers. The Government are advised that where there is no interest in land held otherwise than by or on behalf of the Crown relevant statutory provisions relating to Crown landsection 266(1)(b) of the 1971 Act, which relates to England and Wales, and section 253(1)(b) of the 1972 A ct, which relates to Scotland — preclude any grant of planning permission, and that it is open neither to the Crown nor to any third party to apply for permission in such circumstances.In the light of this advice the Government will continue, when disposing of land, to use the present informal procedures for obtaining opinions from local planning authorities on what development if any they would regard as acceptable. These are laid down for England and Wales in circular 49/63 of the former Ministry of Housing and Local Government. It will also be necessary to consider the validity of any planning appeals or called in planning applications which may have been made by third parties in relation to Crown land. Local authorities, too, will need to consider the validity of any applications in relation to Crown land which are currently before them. They may also in due course wish to consider sympathetically any fresh applications submitted in respect of former Crown land in cases where the validity of a permission previously granted is in doubt.It is proposed to give further and more detailed guidance to local authorities on planning aspects of Crown development and disposal of Crown land.

    Land Commission (Leeds Site)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether the site in Leeds previously owned by the Land Commission referred to in the reply by the hon. Member for Pudsey (Mr. Shaw) on 13 July 1982 has now been sold; when; and for what consideration.

    Negotiations for the disposal of this land are well advanced and I hope to be able to let my hon. Friend know the outcome shortly.

    Betterment Levy

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will bring up to date the reply given by the hon. Member for Pudsey (Mr. Shaw) on 13 July 1982, Official Report, c 332, regarding transactions subject to betterment levy cun-ently under consideration by his Department.

    As at 31 March 1983 there were 292 transactions subject to betterment levy under consideration. Of these:

  • (a) 272 were determined assessments still unpaid;
  • (b) 20 were in dispute but still under negotiation, and
  • (c) Nine of the determined assessments still unpaid have been the subject of a decision of the Lands Tribunal.
  • asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether, supplementary to the reply by the hon. Member for Pudsey (Mr. Shaw) on 13 July 1982, Official Report, c. 332, he is now in a position to discontinue the collection of betterment levy under part Ill of the Land Commission Act 1967.

    The number of cases outstanding continues to decline, but the amount of levy being collected and remaining to be collected is still significant. I cannot yet predict when collection can be discontinued.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will bring up to date the figures given by the hon. Member for Pudsey (Mr. Shaw) on 13 July 1982, Official Report, c. 333, regarding the yield, related staffing and cost of collection of betterment levy.

    Levy and interest thereon collected in the last three years has been as follows:

    £
    1980–8183,630
    1981–8232,569
    1982–83251,970
    The overall administrative costs of collection in 1982–83 are estimated at about £28,000.

    Rate Support Grant

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how much was added to the originally planned level of local authority current rate support grant expenditure for the succeeding year and subsequently built into the rate support grant settlements for 1981–82, 1982–83 and 1983–84.

    Following is the available information for local authorities in England.

    Increase in net current expenditure provision between previous spring and the RSG settlement
    £ million
    1981–82n/a*
    1982–831,000
    1983–841,100
    * In 1980, public expenditure plans were expressed in November 1979 prices and direct comparison with the figures in the 1981–82 settlement is not available.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish rate support grant current expenditure totals for local authorities in England, in total, for 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82, 1982–83 (best estimate) and 1983–84 (original budgets), giving the current expenditure equivalent of the total of targets for 1981–82, 1982–83 and 1983–84.

    Following is the information for local authorities in England.

    RSG current expenditure
    £ million outturn prices
    Outturn/BudgetsProvision in RSG Settlement
    1979–8012,976
    1980–8115,682
    1981–8217,47116,180
    1982–83*19,22818,000
    1983–84*20,55719,692
    * Definition changed: includes interest receipts on services —assumed to be £19 million in 1982–83, and £15 million in 1983–84.
    † Local authority revised estimates, provisional figures.
    ‡Local authority budgets, provisional figures.

    Local Authority Pay

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if, pursuant to the answers of 14 April, Official Report, c. 451–52 and 27 April, Official Report, c.337–38, he will give details of the factors which led to the increase of £800 million in local authority pay between 1978–79 and 1981–82; and to what the remaining £300 million increase was attributed.

    The increase in pay of £800 million —in 1981–82 cost terms—results almost entirely from the increase in local authority pay rates, which rose faster than the GDP deflator in the period 1978–79 to 1981–82. The increase in pay rates covers the effects of pay settlements for the many pay groups employed by local authorities.The remaining £300 million is an estimate of the increase, in 1981–82 cost-terms, in local authorities' running expenses — including subsidies from the rate fund — less the change in sales, fees and charges, adjusted to the same price basis.

    Double Glazing

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has any estimate of the costs of replacing sealed unit double glazing installations with installations which can be opened.

    Sports Council

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if, in view of the circumstances of the resignations of the director and deputy director of the Sports Council, he will withhold further payments of grant pending an inquiry into these circumstances.

    I understand that both officers decided to retire early. These matters are strictly the responsibility of the Sports Council and the individuals concerned. In these circumstances I see no justification for an enquiry or for withholding grant from the Sports Council as suggested.

    Council House Sales

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many council houses have been (a) sold, or (b) are in process of sale to tenants of Carrick district council and Kerner district council, since 1980; what percentage of the respective housing stock was thus sold; and what was the average realisation price per dwelling.

    Sales to sitting tenants, April 1980 to December 1982

    Sale Completed

    RTB Sales in progress at end of period

    Number

    Percentage of LA stock at 1 April 1982

    Average selling price

    £

    Carrick1694808·6

    *9,400

    Kerrier1103638·58,900

    *Average for sales completed up to September 1982.

    Carrick And Kerrier District Councils

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how much money, in total, has been made available in (a) loans, and (b) grants to Carrick district council and Kerrier district council since May 1979; and if he will also state the total of central Government funds paid, respectively, to each of these councils annually from

    Department of the Environment grants and borrowing approvals to Carrick D.C.
    1979–801980–811981–821982–831983–84
    £ million£ million£ million£ million£ million
    GRANTS
    Rate Support Grant:
    Needs and Resources*1·39*1·56
    Block Grant†2·16†1·76†1·89
    Domestic Rate Relief0·890·910·920·940·96
    Capital Grants:0·070·030·05ֵֵ
    Housing‡
    Housing subsidy0·780·860·120ֵ
    Modified Rent Rebates0·400·540·540·60ֵ
    Rent allowance subsidy0·100·110·040·03ֵ
    Homes insulation scheme0·030·030·040·06ֵ
    Improvement contributions0·320·310·360·47ֵ
    Other:
    Coastal Protection0·03000ֵ
    Rate Rebates0·180·250·250·31ֵ
    Rate Rebates for the disabled00·010·030·05ֵ
    Derelict Land0000·60ֵ
    Total Grants4·194·614·510·60ֵ
    BORROWING APPROVALS
    Housing||1·701·501·401·811·80
    Other¶n/an/a0·160·860·30
    Total Borrowing Approvals1·562·672·10
    Department of the Environment grants and borrowing approvals to Kerrier D.C.
    1979–801980–811981–821982–831983–84
    £ million£ million£ million£ million£ million
    GRANTS
    Rate Support Grant:
    Needs and Resources*1·46*l·62
    Block Grant†1·85†1·82†1·83
    Domestic Rate Relief0·850·870·880·900·91
    Capital Grants:0·330·310·48ֵֵ
    Housing‡
    Housing subsidy0·750·740·370ֵ
    Modified Rent Rebates0·340·400·350·46ֵ
    Rent allowance subsidy0·120·140·050·06ֵ
    Slum clearance subsidy0·020·020·020·03ֵ
    Homes insulation scheme0·020·030·030·03ֵ
    Improvement contributions0·320·310·300·46ֵ
    Other:
    Urban Programme000·010ֵ

    1979–80 to 1982–83 (i) including rate support grant, (ii) excluding support grant, and (iii) money paid for all other projects and special activities in those years; and what is the estimated spending on each of these categories for 1983–84.

    1979–80

    1980–81

    1981–82

    1982–83

    1983–84

    £ million

    £ million

    £ million

    £ million

    £ million

    Rate Rebates0·160·250·270·32ֵ
    Rate Rebates for the disabled00·020·070·06ֵ
    Derelict Land0000·01ֵ
    Total Grants4·374·714·68ֵֵ
    BORROWING APPROVALS
    Housing||1·601·401·701·962·00
    Other¶n/an/a0·390·400·32
    Total Borrowing Approvals2·092·362·32

    Notes to Both Tables

    * Figures for 1979–80 and 1980–81 include needs element and that part of the resources element that remained in the district after precepts had been taken.

    † 1981–82: second supplement report; 1982–83 first supplementary report; 1983–84: main report.
    All housing related grants: All figures are from the lates available claim forms; 1981–82 and 1982–83 figures are provisional, 1981–82 from pre-audit forms and 1982–83 from advance forms.
    || (i) Allocations before 1981–82 are not directly comparable with succeeding years because authorities were able to increase their allocations using capital receipts.
    (ii) Further allocations for 1982–83 will be made to authorities for expenditure on housing improvement grants when outturn information is received.
    (iii) Authorities have been advised that additional allocations will be available to any authority whose expenditure on home improvement grants in 1983–84 exceeds its indicative figures and whose total housing expenditure exceeds its housing investment programme allocation. The Chancellor of the Exchequer has also announced that any enveloping scheme which is approved will also receive an additional capital allocation for the costs of works to be undertaken in 1983–84.
    ¶ In 1979–80 and 1980–81 borrowing approvals for other services were granted to county areas: distribution between authorities within the county was determined locally.

    Special Housing Courts

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has given any consideration to the establishment of special housing courts covering the public and the private sector.

    My Department said in response to the report of the Select Committee on the Environment on the private rented housing sector in September 1982, first report, Session 1981–82, that the Government would consider further the idea of a housing court raised by the Committee.

    Compulsory Purchase

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many times the compulsory purchase powers in section 91 of the Local Government Planning and Land Act 1980 have been used to acquire land.

    Section 91 substituted new subsections for section 112(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1971, which dealt with compulsory acquisition by local authorities of land for development and allied purposes. The new subsections came into force on 13 November 1980.Between 1 January 1981 and 31 March 1983 my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State decided 147 orders—126 confirmed, 21 rejected; a further 23 orders were withdrawn before the decisions were taken. I understand that in the same period my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales confirmed six orders and rejected one; two others were withdrawn. Some of these orders would have been submitted under the former section 112 before the section 91 amendments took effect.Information on how many of the confirmed orders have been used is not readily available.

    Building Research Establishment Advisory Committee

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when was the last meeting of the Building Research Establishment advisory committee; whether he proposes to continue with its services; and if he intends to create a new board to assist in the management of the Building Research Establishment.

    [pursuant to his reply, 25 April 1983, c. 276]: I shall write to my hon. Friend.

    London Borough Of Tower Hamlets

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what have been the allocations for housing expenditure, in constant prices, to the London borough of Tower Hamlets in each year since 1972; and what is the estimate for 1983.

    [pursuant to his reply, 28 April 1983, c. 390]: I shall write to the right hon. Member.

    Housing Expenditure

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what have been the allocations for housing expenditure, in constant prices, to each London borough and the Greater London council and the total for these authorities in each year since 1974; and what is the estimate for 1983.

    [pursuant to his reply, 5 May 1983, c. 148]: I shall write to the hon. Member.

    Urban Development Grant

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list urban development grant scheme approvals by authority, showing the estimated amounts of urban development grant and private sector resources to be invested in each scheme.

    The following table gives details of the projects I have so far approved for urban authorities concerned of terms and conditions. The projects marked with an asterisk are those where the amounts of UDG and

    Local authorityDeveloperDescription of projectTotal estimated project costMaximum estimated UDGTotal estimated private sector investment
    (£ 000s)(£000s)(£ 000s)
    West Midlands
    BirminghamMidland Industrial Association Ltd.Conversion of vacant listed industrial building into 30 workshop units Frederick Street.490,000151,000339,000
    BirminghamFocol Developments Ltd.Conversion of listed Georgian house into offices and refurbishment of industrial building for conversion into flats, St. Paul's Square.735,000103,000632,000
    BirminghamR. J. Whitehead and CompanyDemolition of obsolete factory and construction of light industrial units, at Warstone Parade East.674,000112,000562,000
    BirminghamHarrowby Street PropertiesConversion and refurbishment of obsolete industrial building to provide small workshop studio/units, Spencer Street/ Augusta Street.292,00038,000254,000
    BirminghamFocol Developments Ltd.Conversion of a redundant factory into 22 starter nursery units, Factory Road.388,00065,000323,000
    BirminghamTibbats and CompanyRestoration of three derelict properties to provide a restaurant and offices, 3, 4, 5 St. Paul's Square.366,000102,000264,000
    BirminghamW. A. Blackburn LimitedConversion of derelict industrial premises into 6 storey office buildings, Whitthall Street.3,160,000530,0002,630,000
    Birmingham*Henry Boot Projects LimitedComprehensive redevelopment of Paradise Circus for offices, a hotel car parking, civic facilities and completion of shopping mall.33,865,0004,680,00024,036,000
    DudleyHardanger Properties LimitedDevelopment of derelict industrial site as High Street shopping centre, High Street/Moor Street, Brierley Hill.3,359,000453,0002,906,000
    DudleyPrecitition LimitedExpansion of roller skate manufacturing company—construction of new building, Victoria Road, Halesowen.153,00038,000115,000
    DudleyBelgrave (Blackheath) plcRemoval of plant and equipment from an outdated manufacturing site in Belgrave Road, Halesowen, and redevelopment of the site to provide 29 houses for sale.811,00064,000747,000
    Sandwell*Wimpey Homes Holdings LimitedReclamation of derelict site and development of 152 dwellings for sale, Dudley Road West Tividale.3,464,000155,0003,087,000
    SandwellPilkington Industrial EstatesConstruction of seven industrial units on site of derelict glass works, Crystal Drive, Smethwick.641,000141,000500,000
    WolverhamptonAirmark and Company (Engineering Limited)Construction of finishing bay for sheet metal products, Freeman Street, Heath Town.120,00025,00095,000
    WolverhamptonWest Midlands Trucks (Salvage and Spares Limited)Construction of new repair workshop, Colliery Road.304,00054,000250,000
    London
    Brent*Lesser LandRedevelopment of run-down site to provide new shopping centre High Street/Manor Park Road/Tavistock Road, Harlesden.8,706,000To be settled
    Brent*Farrow Property Developments LimitedSupermarket, car park and open space for recreation at Willesden Green.2,984,000To be settled

    private sector resources remain to be settled and those where public expenditure other than UDG will be involved.

    I have now approved 72 projects for urban development grant representing total investment of some £153 million in the inner cities and other urban areas.

    Local authority

    Developer

    Description of project

    Total estimated project cost

    Maximum estimated UDG

    Total estimated private sector investment

    (£000s)

    (£000s)

    (£000s)

    EalingSection Build LimitedConversion of empty factory building into 51 small workshops, Bridge Road, Southall.1,200,000365,000835,000
    GLCLEntA PropertiesConversion of derelict printing works into studio workshop/office accommodation 70 Rosebery Avenue Islington.378,000140,000238,000
    GreenwichDelta Rods LimitedDivision of cleared site into small parcels and provision of services Tunnel Avenue.1,448,000190,0001,258,000
    HackneyChurch CommissionersConstruction of workshop and factory units together with office accommodation, Scrutton Street/Phipp Street South Shoreditch.2,012,000460,0001,552,000
    HackneyThe Prudential Assurance Company Ltd.Redevelopment of terrace into four shops with flats above, 53–61 Broadway Market.266,000127,000139,000
    HackneyBritish Rail Property BoardConversion of underused railway arches into low cost industrial units, 173–182 Bohemia Place.321,00089,000232,000
    HackneyMoledene Ltd.Refurbishment and conversion of a disused industrial building in Sylvester Road, Hackney, into 18 small industrial units.371,00071,000300,000
    LambethOK/DIYConstruction of petrol rilling station in Streatham Place and provision of DIY car repair workshop and training facilities.808,000223,000562,000
    LewishamPaul Dunstall Organisation Ltd.Construction of 18 nursery industrial units, 78a Blackheath Hill, East Deptford.310,00085,000225,000
    SouthwarkAquis Securities LimitedProvision of a spine road and initial development of the 75-acre Bricklayers arms site.7,480,0001,400,0006,080,000
    Southwark*Estates Property Investment Co. plcConstruction of a supermarket, up to 20 smaller shops, new banking premises and car parking spaces in Denmark Hill, Camberwell.4,650,000To be settled
    Tower HamletsMoledene Ltd.Refurbishment and conversion of a disused industrial building in Three Colts Lane, Tower Hamlets; into small industrial and office units.1,328,000120,0001,208,000
    WandsworthAdvance Services picNew headquarters and distribution centre for laundry company, Frogmore.3,710,000500,0003,210,000

    East Midlands

    NottinghamNorfolk Place Properties (Nottingham) Ltd.Conversion of former Head Post Office into office accommodation, Queen Street.3,189,000750,0002,439,000
    NottinghamCostain Homes Ltd.Construction of 52 new houses and conversion of disused factory into 52 fiats, Turney's Factory, London Road.4,383,000488,0003,895,000
    NottinghamSanden Construction Ltd.Construction of 32 starter homes and 20 industrial units, Gadd Street/Southey Street, Hyson Green.1,079,000198,000881,000
    NottinghamNottingham Ice Stadium Ltd.Installation of new refrigeration equipment and improvement and modernisation of stadium, Gadd Street.434,000131,000303,000

    Yorkshire and Humberside

    BradfordFasdish Ltd.Conversion of disused Victorian wool warehouse into workshop units, 47 Well Street.545,000155,000390,000
    HullWykeland Ltd.Refurbishment of listed bonded warehouse for use as craft workshops, 42/43 High Street.109,00023,00086,000
    Hull*Naburn Marina Ltd. Trust Houst Forte Ltd. Abbey National Housing AssociationComprehensive redevelopment of 60 acres of derelict and unused land adjoining the Humber for a Marina, hotel, housing, industrial and office development, relocation of Hull fruit market and associated road infrastructure.14,579,0001,370,00013,059,000

    Local authority

    Developer

    Description of project

    Total

    Maximum

    Total

    estimated project cost

    estimated UDG

    estimated private sector investment

    (£ 000s)

    (£000s)

    (£ 000s)

    Leeds*Cartwright Developments Ltd.Redevelopment of derelict site to provide industrial units at Balm Road and Beza Road.4,942,000To be settled
    Leeds*Barratt Leeds Ltd.Conversion of three listed warehouses in Dock Street into 110 flats for sale; the facades of the warehouses to be retained.2,416,000592,0001,734,000
    RotherhamTaylor Woodrow DevelopmentsCascades Centre1 shopping development, Howard Street, Effingham Street, Bridgegate.4,600,000500,0004,100,000
    SheffieldAckroyd & Abbott Ltd.rection of 26 houses for sale at Dearne Street.539,000146,000393,000
    South YorkshireHenry Witham Ltd.Provision of new steel stockyard and gantry crane for Henry Witham Ltd., Carbrook Street, Sheffield, together with security fencing and landscaping.130,00020,000110,000
    Wakefield*Wakefield Theatre TrustRefurbishment of Wakefield Opera House to bring it back into use, Westgate.620,000200,000320,000
    WakefieldRunnymeade Holdings LimitedConstruction of 17,200 sq.ft. of industrial units Flanshaw Way.423,00059,000364,000
    WakefieldH. AneleyConstruction of three nursery industrial units, Savile Road, Castleford.150,00030,000120,000
    WakefieldJohn A. Waters (Builders Limited)Construction of two nursery industrial units Wakefield Road Kinsley.52,00013,00039,000
    WakefieldTrinity Services and Agencies Limited/Lemmeleg LimitedRefurbishment of semi-derelict terrace to provide 8 self-contained office suites, Cheapside, Cliff Parade.557,00090,000467,000

    Northern

    GatesheadCameron Hall Developments LimitedRetail showroom development Oakwellgate/Gateshead Highway/East Street.740,000100,000640,000
    GatesheadBowey Homes LimitedConstruction of 28 low cost homes on derelict site Duncan Street.575,00062,000513,000
    GatesheadFaircloughs Building LimitedDevelopment of Metro Shopping Centre, Wylam Street, to provide a supermarket, smaller shops, offices and car parking.4,848,000305,0004,543,000
    GatesheadBullock Developments LimitedRedevelopment of Felling High Street for retail, offices, housing and car parking.1,796,000200,0001,596,000
    MiddlesbroughM. Y. MehdiConversion of former bakery into 31 shops and a restaurant, Linthorpe Road.768,000250,000518,000
    MiddlesbroughFreighthire LimitedConstruction of three industrial units on former petrol station site, Stockton Road.170,00035,000135,000
    MiddlesbroughG. N. Crass and P. HeskethConstruction of two-storey office building 148–150 Borough Road.118,00012,000106,000
    Newcastle-upon-TyneLondon and Manchester Securities LimitedRefurbishment of a group of listed buildings to provide offices, 2–12 Grey Street/21 Mosley Street.997,000135,000862,000
    Newcastle-upon-TyneFairclough Building LimitedRefurbishment of Clarendon House, Clayton Street West, to provide 45 flats for sale.1,201,000169,0001,032,000
    Newcastle-upon-TyneBarratt Newcastle LimitedDevelopment of 59 flats, 2 shops and car parking in Charlotte Square Newcastle.1,313,000324,000989,000
    Newcastle-upon-TyneBellway plcRefurbishment of the Low Delaval Estate to provide 1722-bedroom flats for sale.1,788,000410,0001,378,000
    North TynesideCecil M. Yuill LimitedRefurbishment of nine difficult-to-let five-storey blocks of flats to provide 108 flats for sale, Percy Main.2,281,000868,0001,413,000
    North TynesideVoluntary and Christian Service Housing Association LimitedRehabilitation of run-down, vacant Council housing estate for low cost home Engine Inn Road.836,000189,000647,000
    South TynesideLongbarr Developments LimitedRedevelopment of Catherine Street, South Shields for retail and offices.825,030150,000675,000

    North West

    BoltonFairclough Estates LimitedDemolition of outmoded industrial buildings and construction of new industrial and warehouse units, High Street.1,023,000160,000863,000
    BoltonLyn Town LimitedConstruction of six industrial units on land register site Lostock Lane.1,472,000150,0001,322,000

    Local authority

    Developer

    Description of project

    Total

    Maximum

    Total

    estimated project cost

    estimated UDG

    estimated private sector investment

    (£ 000s)

    (£ 000s)

    (£ 000s)

    KnowsleyLockwoods Construction (Liverpool) LimitedConversion of block of maisonettes into 10 two-storey homes for sale, Roseheath Drive, Halewood.176,00019,000157,000
    Knowsley*Lionise LimitedRe-establishment football and social facilities at Kirkby Town FC.324,000To be settled
    Manchester*Northern Counties Housing AssociationConversion of empty office building into 163 flats, Blackfriars Street.5,010,000To be settled
    ManchesterNorthern Counties Housing AssociationConversion of vacant listed cotton warehouse into 62 flats, Granby Road.1,319,000301,0001,018,000
    MerseysideRadio City (Sounds of Merseyside) PLCEstablishment of museum to commemorate the Beatles, Stanley Street.399,00040,000319,000
    OldhamEric Wright Developments LimitedConversion of former fire-station into offices, Peter Street.484,00090,000394,000
    RochdaleJohn Bright and Brothers LimitedConversion and refurbishment of redundant Moss Mill to provide 100 small industrial units.692,000229,000463,000
    WiganP. J. Morris and Sons (England) LimitedConstruction of shops, offices and flats on derelict site, Smithy Green, Manchester Road, Ince.325,000105,000220,000
    WiganA. L. Gibson Investments (Wigan) LimitedConversion of derelict listed warehouse into offices, Terminal Warehouse Wigan Pier.300,00099,000201,000

    Defence

    Tornado (Torpedo Programme)

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is his latest estimate of the total cost of the programmes for (a) Tornado and (b) new torpedoes.

    As reported to the Public Accounts Committee in 1982, the total estimated production cost to the United Kingdom of the Tornado aircraft programme is £6,175 million at forecast average 1982–83 prices; the total estimated cost of the new torpedo programme was given as £2,320 million on the same price base.

    Union Of Soviet Socialist Republics

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what evidence is available to his Department about any aggressive intentions of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics towards the United Kingdom.

    The Soviet Union has deployed within range of the United Kingdom nearly 500 intermediate range ballistic missiles—comprising some 250 SS4 and SS5 and 243 SS20 with 729 warheads—together with 300 medium bombers, as well as land and sea-based strategic missiles. The size and disposition of Soviet forces in Europe are far in excess of what is necessary for defence alone. The massive and continuing effort to build up these forces, Soviet readiness to use force — as in Czechoslovakia and Afghanistan — and their commitment to an ideology that envisages the ultimate triumph of the Soviet version of communism constitute a threat to the security of this country that cannot be ignored.

    Victoria Barracks, Windsor

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has for the rebuilding of Victoria barracks, Windsor, for occupation by a regiment of the Household division; and when he expects the rebuilding to be completed and the regiment in residence.

    We plan to start rebuilding Victoria barracks, Windsor, in the middle of 1985. Demolition of the existing barracks is due to start this year, and on present plans the rebuild should be completed in 1988. A regiment of the Household division is due to take up residence early in 1989.

    Ship Repair Facilities (Falmouth)

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list by name, date and value of work, vessels of the Royal Navy and the Royal Fleet Auxiliary utilising ship repair facilities at Falmouth since May 1979.

    Since May 1979, Falmouth Shiprepair Ltd has received 39 contracts from the Department for the repair of ships and craft, as follows. The work exceeded £3 million in value but it is not the practice to disclose individual contract sums.

    YearMonthName of Vessel
    1979MayRMAS Clovelly
    JuneRMAS Instow
    JulyHMS Bronnington
    JulyRMAS Instow
    JulyRMAS Alnmouth
    AugustUSAMFA Barges
    SeptemberRMAS Typhoon
    OctoberRMAS Datchet
    NovemberRMAS Datchet
    DecemberRMAS Dolwen
    1980JanuaryHMS Hecate
    JanuaryRMAS Headcom
    JanuaryRMAS Ixworth
    MayUSAMFA Tug
    JuneRMAS Instow
    JulyHMS Gavinton
    SeptemberUSAMFA Floating Crane
    SeptemberRMAS Loyal Moderator
    OctoberRMAS Instow
    1981FebruaryUSAMFA Tug
    AprilHMS Venturer
    JuneUSAMFA Crane
    JuneRFA Olwen

    Year

    Month

    Name of Vessel

    USAMFA Floating
    AugustCrane
    AugustHMAV Arakan
    AugustRMAS Toron
    AugustRMAS Heather
    AugustRMAS Clovelly
    AugustRMAS Instow
    SeptemberRFA Pearleaf
    NovemberHMS Wilton
    1982JuneRMAS Instow
    AugustUSAMFA BARGE
    SeptemberMV Contender Bezant
    OctoberRMAS Instow
    OctoberRMAS Datenet
    NovemberMV Astronomer
    1983JanuaryRFA Sir Caradoc
    MayRMAS Ixworth

    Type 21 Frigates

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence how much expenditure has already been incurred on repairing the aluminium superstructure of the Navy's six type 21 frigates and how much is the total estimated cost; whether it is expected that this will shorten the working life of the frigates; and how long it is expected this work will take to complete.

    The estimated cost of the measures currently in hand to strengthen type 21 frigates is approximately £1·5 million, of which some £250,000 has already been spent. On current plans this work will be completed over the next two years. It is not expected to reduce the in-service life of the ships.

    Capenhurst Enrichment Plant

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence when he expects the enrichment plant under construction at Capenhurst to be completed.

    It is planned that construction of the Capenhurst plant will be completed in 1985.

    Trident Submarines

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what plans exist for the development of the special communications systems for Trident submarines; and how much they will cost.

    The communications fit for our Trident submarines will be based on that currently provided for Polaris, exploiting, where appropriate, available improvements in technology. For security reasons I am not able to give details.

    Arapaho Project

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement about the Arapaho project.

    The Government have concluded an agreement with the United States Government for the lease to the Royal Navy of the Arapaho system, which the United States navy has developed as a means of converting a container ship into a seagoing helicopter operating and maintenance facility. A container ship — the MV Astronomer—has been chartered to carry the Arapaho equipment, which will shortly be transported to this country for modification and fitted to the ship at Cammell Laird Shipbuilders Ltd., Birkenhead. In preparing the United States equipment for operational use substantial additional equipment for accommodation and support modules will be procured from United Kingdom suppliers. The ship will be manned and operated by the Royal Fleet Auxiliary Service.The Government have taken this step to provide an additional stores support and helicopter operating ship capable of deploying to the south Atlantic to supplement the existing RFAs. Lease of the United States equipment was necessary since there is no equivalent system currently available in the United Kingdom.

    Type 22 Frigates

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the type 22 frigate building programme.

    I am pleased to be able to announce that we propose to procure two further type 22 frigates of batch III design. One of these is the fourth Falklands replacement, of which my right hon. Friend the Member for St. Ives (Sir J. Nott) gave notice on 14 December 1982. —[Vol 33, c. 130.] The second frigate is additional to those already announced in our naval programme. We will be inviting competitive tenders for these two ships during the summer.

    Employment

    Walthamstow And Leyton

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many unfilled vacancies were notified to his offices in the Walthamstow-Leyton area in June 1979 and in March 1983, respectively; and in each case what proportions were in manufacturing and in service industries, respectively.

    The industrial analysis of unfilled vacancies is made quarterly for February, May, August and November. At May 1979, the number of notified vacancies remaining unfilled in the Walthamstow-Leyton area was 1,492, of which 46·3 per cent. were for manufacturing and 49·5 per cent. were for service industries. The corresponding number at February 1983 was 181, of which 29·3 per cent. were for manufacturing and 58·6 per cent. were for service industries. The figures do not include vacancies notified to careers offices. Vacancies notified to jobcentres are estimated to be about one third of all vacancies in the economy as a whole. The numbers of vacancies notified during the course of each month were 1,250 in May 1979 and 562 in February 1983.

    Crewe

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people aged (a) 19 years or younger, (b) 20 to 25 years, (c) 26 to 44 and (d) 45 to 65 years were unemployed in May 1979 and in May 1983, or at the most recent available date, in the Crewe travel-to-work area; and what percentage of each age group this represented.

    The following table gives, for the age groups nearest to those specified, the numbers for registered unemployed at April 1979—not available for May — and the numbers for unemployed claimants at January 1983, the latest available. Percentage rates of unemployment by age are not calculated for local areas.

    Crewe travel-to-work area
    AgeApril 1979January 1983
    19 and under3651,135
    20 to 243741,335
    25 to 447262,254
    45 to 647011,967
    65 and over52

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many (a) skilled manual workers, (b) unskilled manual workers and (c) manual workers were unemployed in May 1979 and at the latest date in the United Kingdom and in the Crewe travel-to-work area; and, in each case, what percentage of the total trained for such work these figures represented.

    Figures available for the United Kingdom relate to unemployed people registered at jobcentres for employment in the groups shown as follows; September 1982 was the last date on which the analysis was made. Corresponding figures for the Crewe travel-to-work area are not readily available. Figures are not available for people trained for the particular groups, which would be needed for the required percentages.

    June 1979September 1982
    Craft and similar occupations123,800415,400
    General labourers429,000863,200
    Other manual occupations274,500766,000

    Labour Statistics

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what has been the percentage change in the number of people employed in the United Kingdom (a)in vehicle manufacture, (b) in textile manufacture and (c)in mechanical engineering between May 1979 and the latest available date.

    Between May 1979 and February 1983 the number of employees in employment in Great Britain—not available for the United Kingdom— decreased by 36·4 per cent. in motor vehicle manufacture, 35·4 per cent. in textiles and 24·6 per cent. in mechanical engineering. The figures are provisional.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) how many (a) school leavers, (b) people under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 54 years and (e) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (i) Birmingham, Erdington, (ii) Crawley, (iii) Cambridge, (iv) Great Yarmouth, (v) Pendle, (vi) Ilford North, and (vii) Gravesham, respectively;(2) how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories

    (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (i) Birmingham, Erdington,

    (ii) Crawley, (iii) Cambridge, (iv) Great Yarmouth, (v) Pendle, (vi) Ilford North and (vii) Gravesham, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) how many (a) school leavers, (b) people under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 54 years and (e) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (i) Gloucestershire, West, (ii) Hornsey and Wood Green, (iii) Rugby and Kenilworth, (iv) Watford, (v) Coventry South-West and (vi) Langbaurgh, respectively;(2) how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories

    (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks in each of the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (i) Gloucestershire, West, (ii) Hornsey and Wood Green, (iii) Rugby and Kenilworth, (iv) Watford, (v) Coventry South-West and (vi) Langbaurgh, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) how many (a) school leavers, (b) people under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 55 years, and (e) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (a) Ilford, South, (b) Southampton, Test, (c) Erewash, (d) Putney, (e) High Peak, (f) Bolton North-East, and (g) Croydon, North-West, respectively;(2) how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983 respectively, in each of the following categories

    (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (i) Ilford, South, (ii) Southampton, Test, (iii) Erewash, (iv) Putney, (v) High Peak, (vi) Bolton North-East and (vii) Croydon, North-West, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many (a) school leavers, (b) people aged under 25 years, (c) those aged 25 to 44 years, (d) those aged 45 to 54 years, and (e) those aged over 65 years, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983 in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the constituencies of (i) Hornchurch, (ii) Luton South, (iii) Stockton, South, (iv) Birmingham, Selly Oak and (v) Glanford and Scunthorpe, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) how many (i) school leavers, (ii) people aged under 25 years, (iii) people aged 2 to 44 years, (iv) people aged 45 to 54 years and (v) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (a) Oxford, East, (b) Corby, (c) Nottingham, East, (d)Slough, (e) Mitcham and Morden, (f) Hertfordshire West, (g) Batley and Spen, (h) The Wrekin, (i) Ealing, North, (j) Southampton, Itchen, (k) Stevenage, (l) North-West Leicestershire, (m) South Derbyshire, (n) Halifax, (o) Edmonton, (p) Lewisham, West, and (q) Ellesmere Port and Neston, respectively;

    (2) how many people were unemployed in April 1974 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (a) Oxford, East, (b) Corby, (c)Nottingham, East, (d) Slough, (e) Mitcham and Morden, (f) Batley and Spen, (g) Hertfordshire, West, (h) The Wrekin, (i) Ealing, North, (j) Southampton, Itchen, (k)Stevenage, (l) Ellesmere Port and Neston, (m) Northwest Leicestershire, (n) Derbyshire, South, (o) Halifax, (p) Edmonton and (q) Lewisham, West, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) (a) how many school leavers, (b) people aged under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 54 years and (e) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies: (a) Elmet, (b) West Lancashire, (c) Brentford and Isleworth, (d) Northampton, North, (e) Newark, and (f) Jarrow, respectively;(2) how many

    (a) school leavers, (b) people aged under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 54 years and (e) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies: (i) Stockport, (ii) Dartford, (iii) Manchester, Withington, (iv) Streatham, (v) South-East Staffordshire, (vi) Dover, (vii) Wallasey, and (viii) Jarrow, respectively;

    (3) how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies: (i) Stockport, (ii) Dartford, (iii) Manchester, Withington, (iv) Streatham, (v) South-East Staffordshire, (vi) Dover, (vii) Wallasey, and (viii) Jarrow, respectively;

    (4) how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the parliamentary constituencies of (i) Elmet, (ii) West Lancashire, (iii) Brentford and Isleworth, (iv) Northampton, North, (v) Newark, and (vi) Jarrow, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) how many (a) school leavers, (b) people aged under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 54 years and (e) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies: (i) Birmingham, Yardley, (ii) Chorley, (iii) Norwich, North, (iv) Crewe and Nantwich, (v) Rossendale and Darwen, and (vi) Newcastle, Central, respectively;(2) how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories

    (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks

    in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies: (i) Peterborough, (ii) Eltharn, (iii) Bury, North, (iv) Norfolk, North-West and (v) Wansdyke, respectively;

    (3) how many (a) school leavers, (b) people aged under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 54 years and (e) people aged 55 years and over, respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies: (i) Peterborough, (ii) Eltham, (iii) Bury, North, (iv) Norfolk, North-West and (v) Wansdyke, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) how many (a) school leavers, (b) people aged under 25 years, (c) people aged 25 to 44 years, (d) people aged 45 to 54 years and (e) people aged over 55 years and over respectively, were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies: (i) Medway, (ii) Lincoln, (iii) Hampstead and Highgate, (iv) Bristol, North-West, (v) Enfield, North, (vi) Bolton, West, (vii) Littleborough and Saddleworth, and (viii) Whitehaven, respectively;(2) how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories

    (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the parliamentary constituencies of (i) Medway, (ii) Lincoln, (iii) Hampstead and Highgate, (iv) Bristol, North-West, (v) Enfield, North, (vi) Bolton, West, (vii) Littleborough and Saddleworth, and (viii) Whitehaven, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people were unemployed in April 1979 and January 1983, respectively, in each of the following categories (a) up to 26 weeks, (b) 26 to 52 weeks, (c) 52 to 104 weeks, (d) 104 to 156 weeks and (e) over 156 weeks in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies: (i) Birmingham, Yardley, (ii) Chorley, (iii) Norwich, North, (iv) Crewe and Nantwich, (v) Rossendale and Darwen and (vi) Newcastle, Central, respectively.

    It has not been possible to provide the information requested in the time available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in each of the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (a) Birmingham, Erdington, (b) Crawley, (c) Cambridge, (d) Great Yarmouth, (e) Pendle, (f) Ilford, North, and (g)Gravesham, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in each of the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (a) Gloucestershire, West (b) Hornsey and Wood Green, (c) Rugby and Kenilworth, (d) Coventry, South-West, (e) Watford and (f) Langbaurgh, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in each of the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (a)Ilford, South, (b)Southampton, Test, (c)Erewash, (d)Putney, (e)High Peak, (f)Bolton, North-East, and(g)Croydon, North-West.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people were unemployed and what was the perentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in each of the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the following constituencies: (a)Oxford, East, (b)Corby, (c)Nottingham, East, (d)Slough, (e)Mitcham and Morden, (f)Hertfordshire, West, (g)The Wrekin, (h)Ealing, North, (i)Ellesmere Port and Neston, (j)Southampton, Itchen, (k)North-West Leicestershire, (l)South Derbyshire, (m)Halifax, (n)Edmonton, (o)Lewisham, West, (p)Stevenage and (q)Batley and Spen, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies: (a)Peterborough, (b)Eltham, (c)Bury North, (d)Norfolk, North-West and (e)Wansdyke, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the parliamentary constituencies of (a)Birmingham, Yardley, (b)Chorley, (c)Norwich, North, (d)Crewe and Nantwich, (e)Rossendale and Darwen and (f)Newcastle, Central, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most nearly corresponding to the following parliamentary constituencies: (a)Medway, (b)Lincoln, (c)Hampstead and Highgate, (d)Bristol, North-West, (e)Enfield, North, (f)Bolton, West, (g)Littleborough and Saddleworth and (h)Whitehaven, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the parliamentary constituencies of (a)Elmet, (b)West Lancashire, (c)Brentford and Isleworth, (d)Northampton, North, (e)Newark and (f)Jarrow, respectively;(2) how many people were unemployed and what was the percentage rate in May 1979 and March 1983, respectively, in the travel-to-work areas most closely corresponding to the parliamentary constituencies of

    (a)Stockport, (b)Dartford, (c)Manchester, Withington, (d)Streatham, (e)South-East Staffordshire, (f)Dover, (g)Wallasey, and (h)Jarrow, respectively.

    The March 1983 figures for all the travel-to-work areas in England were published in table 2.4 of the labour market data section of the April 1983 issue of Employment Gazette, a copy of which is in the Library. The May 1979 figures for the corresponding areas are given in the following table.

    Number

    Percentage rate

    South East

    *Aldershot

    1,9892·4
    Alton2362·5
    Andover4862·6
    Ashford (Kent)1,0373·9
    Aylesbury9742·2
    Banbury1,2354·5
    Basingstoke1,3372·9

    *Bedford

    2,6133·1

    *Braintree

    1,1993·4

    *Brighton

    7,7705·7
    Buckingham1092·2

    *Canterbury

    1,9024·8

    *Chatham

    6,6015·6

    *Chelmsford

    1,9702·9

    *Chichester

    1,7973·8
    Clacton-on-Sea1,4978·4
    Colchester2,5144·4
    Cranbrook2764·5

    *Crawley

    3,1822·0
    Dover9714·2

    *Eastbourne

    1,5323·7

    *Folkestone

    1,5885·9

    *Greater London

    134,0503·5

    *Guildford

    1,9512·1

    *Harlow

    2,2003·0
    Harwich2963·5

    *Hastings

    2,5005·8

    *Hertford

    6761·8

    *High Wycombe

    1,7391·9

    *Hitchin

    1,3692·6

    *Luton

    5,3164·0
    Lymington6144·9
    Maidstone2,3252·9
    Margate1,5599·1
    Milton Keynes2,5305·9
    Newbury9553·6

    *Newport (IOW)

    2,1235·2

    *Oxford

    6,7463·8

    *Portsmouth

    9,9434·9

    *Ramsgate

    2,4647·1

    *Reading

    4,2012·5
    Sheerness8618·1

    *Sittingbourne

    1,2575·3

    *Slough

    2,2351·9

    *Southampton

    7,7433·6

    *Southend-on-Sea

    10,9695·6

    *St. Albans

    1,5831·8
    Stevenage1,3183·4

    *Tunbridge Wells

    2,1582·6

    *Watford

    2,8192·3

    *Worthing

    2,1043·6

    East Anglia

    *Beccles

    3964·1
    Bury St. Edmunds8773·2
    Cambridge2,0562·4
    Cromer6608·2
    Dereham6848·4
    Diss4494·3
    Downham Market4056·8
    Ely4414·6
    Fakenham5247·2
    Great Yarmouth2,6947·2
    Halesworth2766·6
    Haverhill3193·1
    Hunstanton37610·5
    Huntingdon8473·7

    *Ipswich

    3,8813·6
    Kings Lynn1,8216·4
    Leiston2675·4
    Lowestoft1,6025·7
    March4115·1

    *Newmarket

    5883·7
    North Walsham3724·6

    *Norwich

    5,1524·1
    Peterborough3,3995·0

    Number

    Percentage rate

    St. Neots3483·2
    Sudbury4863·8

    *Thetford

    8654·5
    Wisbech1,1327·4

    South West

    *Axminster

    4127·8
    Barnstable1,2415·6
    Bath2,4295·2
    Bideford9157·8
    Blandford2984·1
    Bodmin4286·7

    *Bournemouth

    6,2864·5

    *Bridgwater

    1,5765·7
    Bridport4176·5

    *Bristol

    16,8945·3
    Bude4579·8
    Camelford29011·5
    Chard3164·0

    *Cheltenham

    2,6323·7

    *Chippenham

    1,1674·2
    Cirencester3643·5
    Dartmouth24810·8
    Devizes2803·2
    Dorchester3912·6
    Dursley3653·3

    *Exeter

    3,6645·0
    Falmouth1,27311·4

    *Forest of Dean

    7683·9
    Frome4485·1
    Gloucester2,7214·1
    Helston87615·9
    Honiton5496·8
    Ilfracombe50211·9
    Kingsbridge4219·9
    Launceston3707·3

    *Liskeard

    4977·7
    Midsomer Norton5064·8
    Minehead3424·3
    Newquay8579·2
    Okehampton2546·0
    Penzance1,25010·9

    *Plymouth

    9,6137·9

    *Redruth

    2,34110·5

    *Salisbury

    1,5664·1
    Shaftesbury3155·7
    St. Austell1,3296·5
    St. Ives42112·5

    *Stroud

    9674·1
    Swindon4,3155·4
    Taunton1,5663·8
    Tiverton7196·4

    *Torbay

    5,3567·7

    *Trowbridge

    8763·4
    Truro1,2467·5
    Wadebridge3419·7

    *Wareham

    2643·2
    Warminster4534·1

    *Wells

    5872·8
    Weston-Super-Mare1,9557·5
    Weymouth1,2086·3

    *Yeovil

    1,5413·8

    West Midlands

    *Birmingham

    40,1495·7
    Burton-upon-Trent1,2733·5

    *Coventry

    15,4296·3

    *Dudley and Sandwell

    12,2193·9
    Evesham3992·8
    Hereford1,8805·2

    *Kidderminster

    1,9855·0
    Leamington1,8903·8
    Ledbury2265·6
    Leek5504·0
    Leominster3856·7
    Ludlow4906·3
    Market Drayton3497·0

    Number

    Percentage rate

    *Oakengates

    4,4607·8
    Oswestry7205·4
    Redditch1,5334·6
    Ross-on-Wye3045·8
    Rugby1,4914·8
    Shrewsbury1,5373·7

    *Stafford

    1,6893·0

    *Stoke-on-Trent

    8,0694·1
    Stratford-on-Avon4842·7
    Uttoxeter2493·4

    *Walsall

    8,4295·1
    Whitchurch2194·3

    *Wolverhampton

    8,1815·6

    *Worcester

    3,1004·3

    East Midlands

    Alfreton1,1054·7
    Boston1,5766·5

    *Buxton

    5192·5

    *Chesterfield

    4,1195·0

    *Coalville

    1,5453·3
    Corby2,0186·5

    *Derby

    5,0033·4
    Gainsborough9087·4
    Grantham1,0555·0
    Hinkley8093·2
    Holbeach3455·2
    Horncastle1856·2
    Kettering1,0543·5

    *Leicester

    10,9004·7
    Lincoln3,9416·2
    Loughborough1,2792·9
    Louth3784·9
    Mablethorpe46212·7
    Mansfield3,5185·8
    Market Harborough2072·4

    *Matlock

    3862·3
    Melton Mowbray5694·4
    Newark9664·3

    *Northampton

    3,1463·0

    *Nottingham

    16,1924·8
    Retford6154·2
    Rushden2701·7
    Skegness1,30410·4
    Sleaford5496·0
    Spalding7025·2

    *Stamford

    1,0214·7
    Sutton-in-Ashfield1,3153·8
    Wellingborough9663·9
    Worksop1,4085·2

    Yorkshire and Humberside

    *Barnsley

    5,1686·4

    *Bradford

    10,3576·2
    Bridlington9259·2

    *Castleford

    3,6025·8

    *Dewsbury

    2,9944·6

    *Doncaster

    7,9877·2
    Driffield1211·9
    Filey1704·0
    Goole7996·5
    Grimsby4,53260

    *Halifax

    2,6353·6
    Harrogate1,2073·5
    Huddersfield3,4673·8

    *Hull

    14,3007·9
    Keighley1,3424·5

    *Leeds

    16,2224·7
    Maltby7197·9
    Malton2694·0

    *Mexborough

    2,8689·5
    Northallerton5733·7
    Pickering2734·5
    Richmond5806·7
    Ripon2503·8
    Rotherham4,3527·1
    Scarborough1,5896·3

    Number

    Percentage rate

    *Scunthorpe

    3,4135·3
    Selby4503·7

    *Sheffield

    13,2734·5
    Skipton2992·1
    Thirsk2843·9
    Todmorden4274·1

    *Wakefield

    3,5994·9
    Whitby56610·4
    York3,3054·0

    North West

    *Accrington

    1,1814·0

    * Ashton-under-Lyne

    3,8584·1
    Bamoldswick1972·7

    *Birkenhead

    15,79610·1

    *Blackburn

    4,0776·0

    *Blackpool

    6,8656·4

    *Bolton

    6,2265·6

    *Burnley

    2,0464·1

    *Bury

    2,5764·1
    Chester2,9445·5
    Clitheroe1941·7

    *Crewe

    2,1613·4

    *Lancaster

    3,0486·5

    *Leigh

    2,4485·7
    Liverpool57,06011·8
    Macclesfield1,0183·7

    *Manchester

    36,6345·2

    *Nelson

    1,0824·2

    *Northwich

    1,7244·3

    *Oldham

    3,6333·7

    *Ormskirk

    3,35410·8

    *Preston

    6,7994·7
    Rochdale2,8215·4

    *Rossendale

    8924·5
    Southport2,4757·5
    St. Helens5,0807·8

    *Warrington

    3,9085·0

    *Widness

    5,4359·9

    *Wigan

    6,0818·7

    North

    *Alnick

    7927·4
    Barnard Castle2746·2
    Berwick-on-Tweed3744·4
    Carlisle2,5065·0

    *Central Durham

    4,1766·3

    *Consett

    3,28310·5

    *Darlington and South West Durham

    4,9406·1

    *Furness

    2,3545·2
    Haltwhistle1404·9
    Hartlepool5,30811·8
    Hexham4044·0

    *Kendal

    60426
    Keswick1154·0

    *Morpeth

    4,7757·9

    1983

    1979

    5 weeks ended 8 April

    Weekly Average

    5 weeks

    *

    ended 7 April

    Weekly Average

    Hull Jobcentre area9131831,912383
    Hull travel-to-work area1,1802362,184437

    * Converted from four-week period.

    These figures do not represent the total number of vacancies in these areas. Nationally, it is estimated that about one third of all vacancies are notified to jobcentres.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the latest estimate of the number of

    Number

    Percentage rate

    *North Tyne

    18,8817·0
    Penrith4803·8

    *Peterlee

    2,6439·9

    *South Tyne

    18,07910·2

    *Teesside

    19,2208·5

    *Wearside

    16,04411·1

    *Whitehaven

    2,0817·1

    *Workington

    2,1637·1

    *Travel-to-work area comprising two or more jobcentre areas.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the male and female unemployment for the Hull employment office area and travel-to-work area, percentage and absolute for 14 April 1983; and what were the comparable figures for 14 April 1979.

    The following table gives the number of males and females unemployed in the Hull jobcentre area and the numbers and percentage rates for the Hull travel-to-work area. Rates of unemployment are calculated only for complete travel-to-work areas.

    NumberPercentage rate
    MaleFemaleMaleFemale
    Hull jobcentre area
    April 1979 (registered unemployed)9,1932,978**
    April 1983 (unemployed claimants)16,7705,578**
    Hull travel-to-work area
    April 1979 (registered unemployed)11,1513,5549·85·2
    April 1983(unemployed claimants)22,1297,42520·010·6
    * Not available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many vacancies were notified to the jobcentres and employment offices in the Hull employment office area and the Hull travel-to-work area during the five weeks ended 8 April 1983; and what was the average number per week and for the same period in 1979.

    The information requested is as follows:people in employment in Cornwall; and how this compares with the mid-year figures for 1979, 1980, 1981, and 1982, respectively.

    The most recent figures show 125,300 employees in employment in Cornwall at June 1978. I regret that estimates for 1979 and later years are not available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people in the Keighley travel-towork area have been unemployed for (a) up to six months, (b) six months to 12 months, (c) 12 months to 18 months, (d)18 months to two years and (e) over two years, at the most recent practicable date and at May 1979.

    The following is the information for the Keighley jobcentre area at April 1979—not available for May—and at January 1983, the latest available.

    Unemployed by durationRegistered unemployed April 1979Unemployed claimants January 1983
    Up to 26 weeks7332,009
    Over 26 and up to 52 weeks239790
    Over 52 and up to 78 weeks94508
    Over 78 and up to 104 weeks42191
    Over 104 weeks186567

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many redundancies in (a) the textile industry, (b) machine tool engineering, (c) general engineering, (d) service trades and (e) steel fabrication work have been made in the Keighley travel-to-work area since May 1979.

    The number of redundancies, involving 10 or more employees, reported as due to occur in the Keighley travel-to-work area in the industries specified, between May 1979 and March 1983* is as follows:

    Number
    (a) Textiles (Order XIII)1,128
    (b) Machine tool engineering (MLH 332)381
    (c) Mechanical engineering (Order VII)634
    (d) Service industries (Orders XXII-XXVII)14
    (e) Steel manufacture (MLH 311)nil
    * This includes provisional figures for March 1983. Information relating to April is not yet available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many young persons age 16 to 18 years are currently unemployed in the Keighley travel-to-work area.

    At 13 January 1983, the latest date for which an analysis by age is available, there were 463 unemployed claimants aged 18 years and under in the Keighley jobcentre area.

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what was the increase in the level of unemployment between May 1979 and the most recent practicable date in the travel-to-work area which includes Ilkley in west Yorkshire.

    Between May 1979 and October 1982 the number of registered unemployed in the Leeds travel-towork area, which includes Ilkley, increased by 29,009. Between October 1982 and April 1983 the number of unemployed claimants in the area increased by 1,138.

    Huddersfield

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) if he will estimate the number of jobs lost through redundancies and closures in the Huddersfield travel-to-work area since 1979; and if he will make a statement;(2) how many job losses through redundancies and closures have been notified to his Department for the Huddersfield travel-to-work area since May 1979; and if he will make a statement.

    A total of 11,731 redundancies, involving 10 or more employees, were reported to the Manpower Services Commission as due to occur in the Huddersfield travel-to-work area between 1 January 1979 and 31 March 1983 (these statistics include provisional figures for March 1983). Of these, 2,243 were due to closures. The equivalent figures since May 1979 are 11,514 and 2,229, respectively. Estimates of redundancies and closures not reported to the MSC are not available.

    Unemployment Benefit

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people were in receipt of unemployment benefit from the Huddersfield employment office in May 1979, May 1980, May 1981, May 1982 and the latest month for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement.

    Information is not available in the precise form requested. The following table gives the numbers registered as unemployed in the Huddersfield jobcentre area at may each year from 1979 to 1982, and the numbers of unemployed claimants at April 1983.

    Number
    May 19793,467
    May 19805,451
    May 19819,922
    May 198211,575
    April 198311,648
    Note: Claimants cover those people claiming unemployment benefit, supplementary benefits and national insurance credits.Registrants, in addition to claimants, include non-claimants registered for full time work.

    Slough Skillcentre (Instructor)

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether he has yet been able to fill the vacancy for an instructor in industrial testing and service mechanics at Slough skillcentre; what are the prospects for an improvement in the number of places available on this course; and if he will make a statement.

    I understand that the Manpower Services Commission has not yet found a suitable candidate for this post but hopes to do so shortly. Once an appointment is made, the class will cater for 12 trainees. There are no immediate plans to increase the number of places on this course beyond that level.

    Jobcentre Placements

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many job placements have been made by the jobcentres at Falmouth, Redruth, Camborne and Hayle, respectively, from March 1979 to the most convenient recent date for which figures are available.

    The information requested for the four years ended 4 March 1983 is as follows:

    Jobcentre

    Placings

    Falmouth7,066
    Redruth4,825
    Camborne4,245
    Hayle1,699

    There is likely to have been a substantial number of people who found jobs in these areas other than through the jobcentres.

    Temporary Short-Time Working Compensation Scheme

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many jobs have been supported in the Falmouth-Camborne-Hayle special development area since March 1979 by the temporary short-time working compensation scheme.

    In the period from 1 April 1979 to 31 March 1983 the temporary short-time working compensation scheme provided support for 597 jobs in the Falmouth-Camborne-Hayle special development area as follows:

    Number
    Falmouth Employment Office Area153
    Camborne Employment Office Area281
    Hayle Employment Office Area163

    Job Release Scheme

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many vacancies have been created in the Falmouth-Camborne-Hayle special development area since the introduction of the job release scheme.

    I regret that the information is not available in the form requested. Detailed statistics on coverage are not held on a cumulative basis below regional level. However, 19,504 people have taken advantage of the scheme in the south west region of the employment division of the the Manpower Services Commission since the scheme was introduced on 3 January 1977. Some 7,566 people within the region are currently receiving payments of the job release allowance; 132 are in the office areas covered by the jobcentres at Camborne, Falmouth and Hayle.

    Blackpool

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the number of people at present registered as unemployed in Blackpool.

    At 14 April, the number of unemployed claimants in the Blackpool jobcentre area was 5,170.

    Students (Grants)

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he has any plans to extend Manpower Services Commission funding so that the Manpower Services Commission can give a grant to employers who offer placements to students completing the training element of their three-year higher national diploma course so that students can be paid; and if he will make a statement.

    The Manpower Services Commission provides financial support to employers who offer industrial placements to college-based sandwich course students at degree or HND level in engineering, technology or computer science. Grants are made available through industry training organisations, which may have to decide priorities for support within the criteria laid down by the commission. Payment to students is, however, a matter between student and employer.

    Equal Pay Act 1970

    asked the Secretary of State for Employment what conclusions he has reached following consultations over his proposals to amend the Equal Pay Act 1970.

    I have studied carefully the comments I have received. It will not be possible to lay the order amending the Equal Pay Act before the dissolution of Parliament.In the light of the consultations I have concluded that changes in the draft regulations circulated in February are necessary, first, in respect of where the onus in equal value cases should lie to show that any difference is one of sex; and, second, the right of women to claim under the new arrangements where they are covered by existing job classifications. In addition I have concluded that the regulations should come into force on 1 January 1984.In particular I have in mind to provide that:

  • (a) a woman claiming equal pay under the arrangements introduced by the amendment would not have the burden of showing that the variation between her contract and that of the man with whom she sought comparison was due to the difference of sex. Instead it would be open to an employer to justify his case by showing that a variation was due to any material factor other than sex, not just a factor personal to the woman;
  • (b) it would be possible for a woman to claim equal pay under the new arrangements even if her job and that of her male comparator were already covered by a job classification system, provided it was shown that the system discriminated on grounds of sex.
  • Social Services

    Supplementary Benefit

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many persons were in receipt of supplementary benefit in (a) Mid Glamorgan and (b) Wales at the latest available date and in May 1979.

    The numbers of cases in action in the Department's offices situated in Mid Glamorgan and in Wales on 15 May 1979 and on 15 February 1983 were as follows:

    (Thousands)
    15 May 197915 February 1983
    Mid Glamorgan35·352·7
    Wales180·6264·2

    Source: 100 per cent. count of cases in action.

    The most recent figures on heating additions payable with supplementary benefit in those offices come from the December 1982 annual statistical inquiry. They are as follows:

    Number

    Mid Glamorgan32,000
    Wales153,000

    Source: Annual Statistical Inquiry December 1982 (provisional figures).

    Private Contractors

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list those companies which have now been awarded contracts for the provision of services previously provided by direct labour under the auspices of health authorities; and if he will make a statement.

    This information is not available centrally, but any contracts which are awarded at a lesser cost for equivalent service mean more money for patient care.

    Publicity Campaigns

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) how much was spent by his Department on publicity campaigns relating to health care in 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82 and 1982–83, respectively; how much has been spent and how much is budgeted for the current year; and what percentage the publicity expenditure on health care campaigns represented of total expenditure by his Department;(2) if he will give details of each of the health care publicity campaigns undertaken by his Department in 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82 and 1982–83; how much was spent on each and is budgeted for each in the current financial year; and what percentage of the total publicity expenditure each of those campaigns represented in each of the years concerned;(3) if he will break down the publicity expenditure by his Department on each of the health care campaigns undertaken in 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82, 1982–83 and 1983–84, indicating how much has been allocated to posters, radio and television advertising, newspaper advertising, magazine advertising, leaflets and circulars to relevant authorities; and what percentage each represents of the total publicity expenditure for each of the campaigns;(4) whether he will set out in the

    Official Report the total expenditure for all the publicity campaigns relating to the social security benefits which his Department makes available for each of the financial years 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82 and 1982–83; how much has been spent in the

    Year and campaigns

    Press advertising

    Media and costs TV and radio advertising

    Leaflets an posters

    Total expenditure

    £

    £

    £

    £

    1979–80: Total DHSS Expenditure

    26·9 billion
    1.German measles vaccination154,00013,000167,000
    2.Overseas travel and health65,000

    *60,000

    125,000
    3.NHS charges and exemptions96,000

    *66,000

    184,000
    4.Free milk and vitamins22,000

    All Health Care publicity

    476,000

    As a percentage of DHSS total

    0·0018 per cent.
    5.Family income supplement125,000169,0003,000297,000
    6.Mobility allowance159,0002,000161,000
    7.Miscellaneous social security†628,000623,000

    financial year 1983–84; how much is budgeted for the current year; and what percentage the publicity expenditure on the social security benefit campaigns represented of total expenditure by his Department in each year;

    (5) whether he will set out in the Official Report details of each of the social security benefits publicity campaigns undertaken by his Department for each of the financial years 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82 and 1982–83, including details of expenditure; how much has been spent for each in the financial year 1983–84; how much is budgeted for each in the current financial year; and what percentage of the total publicity expenditure each of those campaigns represented in each of the years concerned;

    (6) how much was allocated in each social security benefit publicity campaign in the financial years 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82, 1982–83 and 1983–84 to posters, radio and television advertising, newspaper advertising, magazine advertising, leaflets, and circulars to relevant authorities; and what percentage each represents of the total publicity expenditure for each of the campaigns.

    The amounts spent or budgeted on publicity related to health care and social security benefits for the financial years 1979–80 to 1983–84 inclusive are shown in the table. The table also shows the total amounts spent on health care and social security benefits publicity as percentages of total DHSS expenditure for each year.The health care publicity figures do not include expenditure by the Health Education Council, which is the official body responsible for most publicity of this sort. Nor do the figures include expenditure on other DHSS health-related publicity, for example on blood or organ donor recruitment or nursing careers.The social security figures do not include expenditure on national insurance contributions-related advertising. However, it would be disproportionately expensive to analyse the production costs of the hundreds of leaflets produced over the five-year period to extract those related to particular benefit publicity campaigns. The figures shown in the table at 7, 13, 21, 31 and 39 are therefore the approximate total amounts spent on the production of all social security leaflets, covering both benefits and contributions, and often including forms. Poster costs are also included in these figures, but would never exceed 10 per cent. of the amount shown.Official circulars are not considered to be publicity and costs are not readily obtainable.

    Year and campaigns

    Press advertising

    Media and costs TV and radio advertising

    Leaflets an posters

    Total expenditure

    £

    £

    £

    £

    All Benefits publicity

    1,086,000

    As a percentage of DHSS total

    0·0040 per cent.

    1980–81: Total DHSS Expenditure

    33·1 billion
    8. Overseas travel and health

    *70,000

    70,000
    9. NHS charges and exemptions37,000

    *79,000

    116,000
    10. Free milk and vitamins
    11. Ethnic minority health education‡26,00026,000

    All Health Care publicity

    212,000

    As a percentage of DHSS total

    0·0006 per cent.
    12. Family income supplement153,000180,0003,000336,000
    13. Miscellaneous social security†736,000736,000

    All Benefits publicity

    1,072,000

    As a percentage of DHSS total

    0·0032 per cent.

    1981–82: Total DHSS Expenditure

    39·4 billion
    14. Overseas travel and health

    *40,000

    40,000
    15. NHS charges and exemptions

    *87,000

    87,000
    16. Free milk and vitamins
    17. Ethnic minority health education‡4,0004,000

    All Health Care publicity

    131,000

    As a percentage of DHSS total

    0·0003 per cent.
    18. Family income supplement174,000294,00014,000482,000
    19. Help for handicapped people14,00014,000
    20. Emergency—civil service strike222,0001,00015,000238,000
    21. Miscellaneous social security‡832,0O0832,000

    All Benefits publicity

    1,566,000

    As a percentage of DHSS total

    0·0040 per cent.

    1982–83: Total DHSS Expenditure

    44·3 billion
    22. Whooping cough vaccination105,000123,000228,000
    23. Overseas travel and health77,00024,000

    *200,000

    301,000
    24. NHS charges and exemptions

    * 103,000

    103,000
    25. Free milk and vitamins
    26. Ethnic minority health education‡4,0004,000
    27. Solvent abuse prevention (estimate)‡50,00050,000

    All Health Care publicity

    686,000

    As a percentage of DHSS total

    0·0016 per cent.
    28. Family income supplement218,000286,0002,000506,000
    29. Housing benefits293,000See 31293,000
    30. Statutory sick pay155,000314,000See 31469,000
    31. Miscellaneous social security†1,376,0001,376,000

    All Benefits publicity

    2,644,000

    As a percentage of DHSS total

    0·0060 per cent.

    1983–84: Projected DHSS Expenditure

    46·9 billion
    32. Overseas travel and health15,000100,000115,000
    33. NHS charges and exemptions100,000100,000
    34. Free milk and vitamins
    35. Ethnic minority health education‡40,00010,00050,000
    36. Solvent abuse prevention‡5,0005,00010,000

    All Health Care publicity (Budget)

    275,000

    As a percentage of DHSS total

    0·0006 per cent.
    37. Statutory sick pay (estimate)141,000344,000See 39485,000
    38. Family income supplement546,000See 39546,000
    39. Miscellaneous social security317,000†1,185,0001,502,000

    All Benefits publicity (Budget)

    2,533,000

    As a percentage of DHSS total

    0·0054 per cent.

    * Actual costs not available in detail. Estimated total costs shown.

    † Approximate total cost for all social security leaflets, including those for campaigns intemised individually in the table, and for posters.
    ‡ Film or video.

    Mobility Allowance

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) how many persons applied for mobility allowance in the Strathclyde region, Scotland and Great Britain for each of the following years: 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 to date;(2) how many persons who applied for mobility allowance in the Strathclyde region, Scotland and Great Britain had an initial medical examination and were subsequently successful in each of the following years, namely: 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 to date; and what percentage of the total who applied and of those who had an initial medical examination were successful for each of those years;(3) how many persons who applied for mobility allowance in the Strathclyde region, Scotland and Great Britain for each of the following years made successful appeals to the medical board; and what percentage they were of those who had originally applied in 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 to date;(4) how many persons who applied for mobility allowance in the Strathclyde region, Scotland and Great Britain made subsequent appeals to the medical appeal tribunal for each of the following years; and what percentage of the total applicants for mobility allowance the appellants represented in each year: 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 to date;(5) how many persons who applied for mobility allowance in the Strathclyde region, Scotland and Great Britain subsequently made successful appeals to the medical appeal tribunal for each of the following years; what percentage of total applicants for the mobility allowance the successful appellants represented; for each year how many were represented and how many were not; and what percentage they represented of the total number of applicants in each case in 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 to date;

    123456
    Claims decidedNumber allowed without a medical examinationCol. 2 as per cent. of col. 1Number allowed after initial medical examinationCol. 4 as per cent. of col. 1Col. 4 as per cent. of those who had an initial medical examination
    197649,900Nil34,6406969
    197747,0001,3802·929,1506264
    197858,20021,40037·020,7003556
    197961,9001,8903·038,3006264
    198085,7004,9805·851,9806164
    198160,8002,3803·936,0705962
    198288,1002,4602·852,2705961
    1983 (to 30 April)29,2007902·717,4006061
    789101112
    Awards after appeal to medical boardCol. 7 as per cent. of col. 1Appeals to medical appeal tribunalCol. 9 as per cent. of col. 1Successful appeals to medical appeal tribunalCol. 11 as per cent. of col. 1
    19763900·783300·66900·18
    19775001·15901·21800·38
    19786201·17901·31900·33
    19791,3202·18401·32250·36
    19802,7003·11,9102·25200·6
    19812,3003·82,4504·06901·1
    19823,6004·12,6603·07000·8
    1983 (to 30 April)1,3604·67602·62500·8

    (6) how many persons who applied for mobility allowance in the Strathclyde region, Scotland and Great Britain for each of the following years made unsuccessful appeals to the medical appeal tribunal; and what percentage they represented of the total number of applicants and the total number of appellants in 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 to date;

    (7) how many persons who applied for mobility allowance in the Strathclyde region, Scotland and Great Britain for each of the following years were successful in appealing to the Social Security Commissioner for the allowance; and what percentage they represented of all those applying and of all those appealing to the Commissioner in 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 to date;

    (8) how many persons who applied for mobility allowance in the Strathclyde region, Scotland and Great Britain for each of the following years were unsuccessful in appealing to the Social Security Commissioner for the allowance; and what percentage they represented of all those applying and of all those appealed to the Commissioner in 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 to date;

    (9) how many persons who applied for mobility allowance in the Strathclyde region, Scotland and Great Britain for each of the following years were unsuccessful; and what percentage they represented of all those applying for the allowance in 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 to date.

    The information for Great Britain from 1976, when the benefit was introduced, is as follows. I reget that separate figures for Strathclyde region and Scotland are not available.

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    Unsuccessful appeals to medical appeal tribunal

    Col. 13 as per cent. of col. 1

    Col. 13 as per cent. of col. 9

    Successful appeals to the Social Security Commissioner

    Col. 16 as per cent. of col. 1

    Successful appeals as a per cent. of all appeals to the Social Security Commissioner

    19762400·4873n/an/an/a
    19774100·8769n/an/an/a
    19786001·076n/an/an/a
    19796151·073n/an/an/a
    19801,3901·673150·0288
    19811,7602·972230·04100
    19821,9602·274400·0487
    1983 (to 30 April)5101·767190·0695

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    Unsuccessful appeals to the Social Security Commissioner

    Col. 19 as per cent. of col. 1

    Unsuccessful appeals as a per cent. of all appeals to the Social Security Commissioner

    Unsuccessful claims

    Col. 22 as per cent. of col. 1

    1976n/an/an/a14,78030·0
    1977n/an/an/a15,80033·5
    1978n/an/an/a15,26026·0
    1979n/an/an/a20,15032·5
    198020·0021225,52030·0
    1981019,36031·5
    198260·0071329,06033·0
    1983 (to 30 April)10·00359,39032·0

    Notes:

    All figures relate to decisions given in the relevant years, not to the results of claims made in those years.
    Col. 1—Initial claims only.
    Col. 2—Those awarded mobility allowance under the Mobility Allowance (Vehicle Scheme Beneficiaries) Regulations 1977.
    Col. 4—Figures include awards made by medical boards after a reference by the insurance officer.
    Col. 7 and Col. 9—Figures include renewal claims. Separate information on initial claims is not available.
    Col. 11—Figures for appellants represented at medical appeal tribunals are not available.
    Cols. 16 to 21—Figures do not include applications for leave to appeal to the Commissioner. Appeals to the Commissioner are on a point of law only. Successful appeals are referred back to a medical appeal tribunal to decide the medical questions.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many claims in each of the last three years for mobility allowance have been refused on the grounds that the claimant's condition did not permit him from time to time to benefit from enhanced facilities for locomotion.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people in each of the last three years had mobility allowance withdrawn on the grounds that their condition no longer permitted them from time to time to benefit from enhanced facilities for locomotion.

    Postcards/leaflets issued (Approx figure)Supplementary benefit claims receivedNew awards of supplementary benefit madeSingle payments authorised to existing supplementary benefit recipients
    Strathclyde (1980)100,00022,0003406,000
    (approximately)
    Coventry (1981)120,0004,334131978

    The information for 1981 and 1982 is as follows. I regret that figures for 1980 are not available.

    19813
    19827

    Welfare Benefit Campaign

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many welfare benefit campaigns his Department has been aware of since May 1979; if he will list them, giving the amount of additional claims resulting from the campaign and the cost of the campaign; and to what extent his Department monitors such campaigns.

    It would involve disproportionate cost to provide the information requested for every welfare benefits campaign since May 1979. Details of the major campaigns which have taken place are as follows:

    Postcards/leaflets issued (Approx figure)

    Supplementary benefit claims received

    New awards of supplementary benefit made

    Single payments authorised to existing supplementary benefit recipients

    Wolverhampton (1981)90,0002,551194613
    Newcastle (1982)125,0001,52763642
    Cleveland (1982)212,000931150281
    Birmingham (1982)430,00019,5031,2135,444

    The adminstrative cost of dealing with claims prompted by take-up campaigns is not separately recorded and the Department has sought information about the costs falling on organisers of them. The Department monitors campaigns in the simple way exemplified by the above table. Its local administration naturally becomes more or less closely involved in the organisation of take-up campaigns, and the Government welcome well-targeted ones.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how much his Department has spent in each of the last five years on encouraging take-up of welfare benefits by (a) advertisement and (b) advice; and how much expenditure is planned for the future.

    The amount spent by the Department on advertising to encourage the take-up of welfare benefits is as follows:

    £
    1978–79396,000
    1979–80570,000
    1980–81371,000
    1981–82469,000
    1982–83†1,304,000
    1983–84*†1,257,000
    * (budgeted)
    It is not possible to estimate how much has been spent, directly and indirectly, on providing advice.
    † Includes expenditure connected with the launch of Housing Benefit and Statutory Sick Pay.

    Information And Advice

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what plans he has for increasing the amount of information and advice provided locally by his Department.

    Improving the quality of service to the public has been set as one of the Department's key management priorities for 1982–83 and 1983–84. All the Department's local offices have been encouraged to experiment with different ways of providing information and advice. Details of the successful initiatives taken in the first year will be disseminated to all offices by means of a handbook of good practice.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will request all information and advice centres to keep his Department informed about the level and nature of social security inquiries with which they deal.

    The Department has already established close links at national and local level with information and advice agencies. Such links will normally include discussion about the level and nature of social security inquiries being dealt with and I do not therefore think that a separate, formal, approach is necessary.

    Disabled Persons

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what recent representations he has had about waiting lists for help under the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act; and what action he has taken.

    I have had two representations expressing concern about the possibility there were waiting lists for the provision of telephones in Liverpool. I am currently pursuing inquiries with the local authority.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what advice he has given to local authorities about charging for home helps provided under section 2 of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act in cases where the disabled person concerned as on supplementary benefit and unable to meet the charge.

    No specific advice has been issued to the local authorities about charging in such circumstances, but as my hon. and learned Friend said during the Report debate on the Health and Social Services and Social Security Adjudications Bill on 11 May — [Vol. 42, c. 884–51]—in general we would prefer authorities not to charge people on supplementary benefit for most of the range of day and domiciliary services including home helps. We feel that the local authority associations are the most appropriate bodies to provide general guidance for their members on charging for day and domiciliary services and they have been invited to do so. So far one association has accepted but another has declined this request.

    Benefits

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will seek to extend to foreign nationals resident in the United Kingdom who have rnade the necessary national insurance contributions the right to benefit when temporarily absent in another member state of the European Community; and if he will make a statement.

    A foreign national, who is not a national of another European Community member state, is not covered by the European Community regulations on social security for migrant workers. Whether benefit is payable to him when he is temporarily absent from the United Kingdom will depend on the provisions of any bilateral convention on social security between the United Kingdom and the member state involved.If the right hon. Member has a specific situation in mind, and provides me with details, I shall send him a full reply.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will amend regulation 18 of the Housing Benefit Regulations 1982 in order to allow local authorities to waive non-dependant deductions where a housing benefit claimant is receiving residential assistance from a close relative; and if he will make a statement.

    Under regulation 22 of the Housing Benefit Regulations local authorities already have discretion in standard cases to grant additional amounts of housing benefit, if they consider that the tenant's circumstances are exceptional. Discretion exists to add back the amount of the non-dependant deduction made under regulation 18. Regulation 18 of the Housing Benefit Regulations 1982 provides that no deduction shall be made in a certificated case where a non-dependant is giving residential assistance. This carries forward a provision which existed in the supplementary benefit scheme prior to the introduction of housing benefit. There is no equivalent provision for standard cases, and none existed under the old rebate and allowance schemes.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what special benefits are provided for ex-Far East prisoners of war for suffering and privation; what is the take-up of these benefits; and if he will give more publicity to the extra benefits so provided.

    Ex-far eastern prisoners of war are entitled to the full range of war pensions provision for any disablement due to their service. In addition the Department arranges, on request, a special hospital checkup to ascertain whether or not the ex-prisoner of war is suffering from a tropical disease. It is not possible to say what the take-up rate is, but these arrangements have been substantially expanded recently, the investigation centres being increased from three to 10, and over 1,100 ex-prisoners of war availed themselves of the facility in 1982. There has already been considerable publicity. More will be considered as appropriate. I keep in close touch with the ex-service organisations, notably the National Federation of Far Eastern Prisoner of War Clubs and Associations, on these matters.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) how many people were in receipt of invalidity benefit in the Hull travel-to-work area in each quarter for the past five years;(2) how many people taken off invalidity benefit in the Hull travel-to-work area over the past four years had a wife or husband or other person with whom they were sharing a household in full time or casual employment.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people were called for examination by his Department's doctors at the Government Buildings, Spring Bank, Hull; and how many were subsequently recommended to lose their invalidity benefit, in each quarter for the past four years, to the most convenient date, being expressed both as a percentage and absolute figure.

    The Department's regional medical service gives an opinion on fitness for work and the independent statutory authorities decide whether invalidity benefit should cease to be payable. Records of those called for examination are only retained for two years and at Government Buildings, Spring Bank, Hull these totalled 5,617 for the past two years.Information on the ultimate outcome could be obtained only by naming each claimant and tracing outcomes on an idividual basis and collated information per quarter per year is not available and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he will estimate the level to which children's rates of supplementary benefit would be increased by an increase in expenditure of £395 million;(2) if he is now able to provide a substantive reply to the question of the hon. Member for Birkenhead to which he gave a holding answer on 31 March,

    Official Report, c. 261.

    [pursuant to his reply, 31 March 1983, c. 261]: If an increase in expenditure of £395 million were used solely to increase by a standard amount the supplementary benefit scale rates for dependent children, including children aged 16 or over, the rates could be increased by £4·15 a week. This figure is based upon provisional estimates of the number of dependent children in families in receipt of supplementary benefit in December 1982 and an estimate of the number of additional claims which would be attracted by an increase in the children's scale rates, based on an analysis of the 1979 family expenditure survey.No allowance has been made for the cost of any consequential increases in the other scale rates. If the scale rates for dependent children aged 16 or over were increased by £4·15 a week they would be higher than the rates for non-householder claimants of that age, and the rate for a dependent child aged 18 would be only £1 less than the rate for a single householder.

    Medical Service Committee Case No 50

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when he expects to reach a decision in respect of Medical Service Committee case No. 50, for which an oral hearing was conducted in Doncaster on 25 February.

    Death Grant

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether, in view of the position particularly of those on low income, he will take steps to expedite Her Majesty's Government's decision on the death grant.

    Special help with funeral costs is already available to bereaved families on supplementary benefit. The changes in the supplementary benefit capital limits announced by my right hon. and learned Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer on 15 March 1983—[Vol. 39, c.144]—will assist those on supplementary benefit who have sought to provide for funeral costs either through savings or life assurance. The Government are still considering the future of the death grant in the light of public response to the proposals in the consultative document which were themselves designed to ensure that available funds were used to give greater help to those in greatest need.

    Factor Viii

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what is the annual cost of providing factor VIII for the treatment of haemophiliacs; what resources have been allocated to increase the existing production of factor VIII towards self-sufficiency; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he has any plans to make additional resources available in order to secure national self-sufficiency in the production of factor VIII; and if he will make a statement.

    The blood products laboratory at Elstree is being up-graded at a cost of £2 million and will, over the next three years be redeveloped at a cost of £21 million. When completed, the new Laboratory will be of a size capable of making England and Wales self-sufficient in blood products, including factor VIII. Information about the annual cost of providing factor VIII is not available centrally.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many units of factor VIII have been used for the treatment of haemophiliacs in each of the last three years; what is the estimated annual requirement for such treatment; and what assistance is being given to health authorities to secure adequate supplies.

    The latest available figures for usage of factor VIII are: 1980–57·7 million units and 1981–65·7 million units. There is no evidence that the requirements for adequate treatment are not being met.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many units of factor VIII were (a) imported and (b) manufactured in the United Kingdom in each of the last three years.

    Details of imports of factor VIII are not held centrally. However, 35·5 million units of imported factor VIII were used in 1981, the latest year for which figures are available.In 1981–82 22 million units of factor VIII were manufactured by the blood products laboratory. Figures for earlier years are not immediately available.

    Joint Finance

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how much was spent on joint finance in each year since its inception, in pound sterling and as a percentage of the Government allocation for joint finance.

    The information is as follows:

    YearTotal Spent (£ million)Percentage Cumulative Take-up
    1976–774·252
    1977–7817·575
    1978–7931·183
    1979–8039·888
    1980–8160·192
    1981–8272·894
    1982–83*88·7*96
    * (estimated)
    Any unspent money is carried forward to the following year.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, pursuant to his remarks in Standing Committee B of 1 March 1983, Official Report, c. 124, what proportion of joint finance money is currently being used for recycling of projects existing prior to the allocation of joint finance money.

    This information is not readily available. We are taking steps to improve the recording of joint finance schemes and the information on joint finance expenditure available to the Department. I do not regard the so-called recycling of projects as the best use of joint finance funds and joint consultative committees should devote the increased resources being made available to support new projects caring for people in or near their own homes who might otherwise be long-stay residents in hospitals.

    Orthotists

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many orthotists were employed by the National Health Service in each of the last 10 years; how many district health authorities contract out for this service; and what are the current recommended establishment levels for the National Health Service in this field.

    Orthotists are not separately identified in NHS manpower returns, and no establishment levels have been recommended to authorities. Information about the arrangements authorities make with outside contractors for orthotic seriices is not collected centrally.

    Earnings Rule

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what would be the cost of uprating the earnings rule limit for retirement pensions to its 1979 level.

    Prescription Charges

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what the prescription charges were on 5 May 1983 and the charges for dental treatment and glasses; and what were the comparable figures for 5 May 1979.

    The information is as follows:

    1.Prescription Charges
    May 1979May 1983
    ££
    Prescription Charge0·201·40
    Pre-Payment Certificate
    Four monthlyN/A7·50
    Six monthly2·00N/A
    Annual3·502150
    Elastic Stockings (Single)0·501·60
    Elastic Hosiery (excluding stockings)0251·40
    Wigs and Fabric Supports
    Full bespoke human hair wig7·5049·00
    Partial human hair wig7·5030·50
    Stock modacrylic wig2·501500
    Abdominal and spinal support2·0011·00
    Surgical brassiere2·007·00

    2. Dental Charges

    May 1979

    May 1983

    £

    £

    Maximum for routine treatment5·0013·50
    Crown Inlays'
    pinlays, gold10·0050·00
    others10·0026·00
    Synthetic resin dentures
    1–3 teeth10·0022·00
    4–8 teeth11·0023·00
    over 8 teeth12·0024·00
    Maximum for more than one denture20·0038·00
    Metal denture and bridges
    1–3 teeth15·0040·00
    4–8 teeth16·0042·00
    over 8 teeth17·0044·00
    Maximum for more than one denture30·0080·00
    Overall maximum charge for any one course of treatment30·0095·00

    3. Optical Charges

    a. Lenses

    May 1979

    £

    Description of Lens

    Single vision lens (including single vision lenticular, frosted and chavasse lenses)2·90
    Fused glass bifocal lens5·50
    Lens of any other description615

    Single Vision Glass Lenses (Curved or Flat,—May 1983

    *

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    (4)

    Spherical Power (plus or minus)

    Spherical

    Cylindrical or Sphero-cylindrical Cylindrical Power (plus or minus)

    0·25 to 2·00

    2·25 or more

    £

    £

    £

    Piano to 2·004·004·455·65
    2·25 to 4·004·154·656·10
    4·25 to 6·004·355·256·55
    6·25 or more7·008·058·95

    * This table is not directly comparable with the one for 1979 because of the restructuring of charges in the intervening period.

    Solid glass bifocal lenses

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    Segment size

    Spherical

    Astigmatic

    £

    £

    38mm11·6512·70
    45mm14·0515·10
    22mm15·5015·50

    Other lenses

    (1)

    (2)

    Description of lens

    Amount of charge

    £

    Single vision Plastic, lenticular, frosted or chavasse lens4·65
    Fused glass spherical bifocal lens9·60
    Fused glass astigmatic bifocal lens10·30
    Lens of any other description9·20

    Additional charges in respect of prisms or tints clinically necessary

    (1)

    (2)

    (3)

    Description of lens

    Incorporation of worked prism

    Incorporation of tint

    £

    £

    Single vision lens up to 6.00 spherical or 4.00 cylindrical2·802·40
    Over 6.00 spherical or 4.00 cylindrical1·702·40
    Bifocal lens1·204·80

    3.Optical Charges—b. Frames

    May 1979

    May 1983

    £

    £

    Plain Gold Filled

    Pad bridge; curl sides centre or high joint4·5012·00
    Pad bridge; cellulose acetate tipped hockey end sides, centre or high joint4·2810·95
    Half-eye, flat section eyewire, pad bridge; curl sides4·5010·05
    Half-eye, flat section eyewire, pad bridge; celluslose acetate tipped hockey end sides4·509·0

    Gold Filled Windsor (Cellulose Acetate Trim) Centre or High Joint

    Pad bridge; curl sides4·5012·40
    Pad bridge; cellulose acetate tipped hockey end sides4·2811·40
    Pad bridge; half covered curl sides4·5013·05

    Plastics (Cellulose Acetate)

    Pad bridge; reinforced hockey end sides1·572·05
    Pad bridge; gold filled super comfort curl sides and reinforced cellulose acetate butts2·593·28
    Saddle, flush or inset bridge; reinforced hockey end sides7·508·19
    Saddle, flush or inset bridge, gold filled super comfort curl sides and reinforced cellulose acetate butts8·109·01
    Half-eye regular bridge; reinforced hockey end sides6·507·10
    Half-eye, pad bridge; reinforced hockey end sides2·873·47

    Social Security Regulations

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will consider as a matter of urgency making a change in the social security regulations, particularly regulation 3 of the aggregation regulations, so that students continuing in non-advanced education who reach 19 years after the start of the academic year are not regarded as being dependent upon their parents; and if he will make a statement.

    No. The proposed amendment to regulation 3(5) of the Supplementary Benefit (Aggregation) Regulations 1981 would mean that a family on supplementary benefit with a child who wished to remain at school or college for the academic year in which his 19th birthday fell, would lose the dependency addition for that child as soon as he reached age 19. The family would thus be left without financial support for the child part-way through the year, and he might be compelled to give up his course.

    Free School Clothes

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what increase there has been in the application for, or supply of, free school clothes.

    Single payments of supplementary benefit for distinctive school uniform or sports clothes are specifically excluded under regulation 6(2((b) of the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Regulations 1981. This is because local education authorities have powers to help with clothing for school children. Payments of supplementary benefit for other types of clothing can be made in certain limited circumstances, provided the conditions laid down in the regulations are satisfied. No records are kept of any specific claims which may be for single payments for help with school clothing.

    Social Workers And Children In Care

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, in the latest year for which figures are available, how many social workers there were, how many children were in residential care, and how many children were boarded out and how many were adopted or fostered.

    There were 22,950 whole time equivalent qualified and unqualified social workers employed by local authority social services departments on 31 September 1981. This does not include directing and managerial grades—a further 3,838.On 31 March 1981, the number of children in the care of local authorities who were accommodated in community homes, provided, controlled and assisted by local authorities, voluntary homes, residential nurseries and accommodation for handicapped children was 32,277. The number of children in care who were boarded out with foster parents was 35,749.The number of adoption orders made in the year ended 31 March 1981 was 9,600. The number of privately fostered children known to local authorities on 31 March 1981 was 4,174.All figures are for England.

    Christmas Bonus

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what plans the Government have to pay the Christmas bonus in the current year.

    The Christmas bonus was introduced in 1972. It was not paid in 1975 and 1976 but in 1979 was made a statutory annual entitlement. A Christmas bonus of £10 will therefore be paid this year to people who for the week commencing 28 November are receiving one of the qualifying benefits. It was necessary for this decision to be taken in advance of decisions relating to the November benefit uprating because, for operational reasons pension order books including the Christmas bonus will begin to be issued next week.

    Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Regulations

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether the Social Security Policy Inspectorate has completed its study of the operation of the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Regulations; and if he will make a statement.

    The social security policy inspectorate has completed its study, which forms part of the Department's monitoring of the changes in the supplementary benefit scheme introduced in 1980, and is designed to complement external research — not yet completed— into single payments. While it found the expected teething problems, the inspectorate detected no major deficiencies in the new regulated system of single payments and were encouragingly optimistic about its future. It found that the standard of work in local offices on single payments was generally high.The report suggests a number of changes, all of which have either been implemented or are being considered by the Department. The main suggestions are as follows. First, the inspectorate found that the standard of work on cases where a single payment was refused was less good than on those where a single payment was awarded. It recommended that refusals should be subject to the same monitoring and control as awards. Since the inspectorate carried out the field work for its enquiry, towards the end of 1981, the Department has introduced new and more structured procedures for dealing with single payment claims including those which are unsuccessful. The inspectorate's recommendation on monitoring and control will be considered further in the light of experience of these new procedures.Secondly, the inspectorate recommended that more copies of the regulations should be available in local offices. This has been done; over 850 extra copies of the "Yellow Book" containing all the supplementary benefit regulations were distributed to local offices in 1982.Finally, the inspectorate concluded that guidance on the interpretation of some of the single payment regulations was needed from the chief supplementary benefit officer. Further guidance has now been issued on a number of the regulations, and is being incorporated in the new "S manual" to be published in June.I have arranged for copies of the inspectorate's report to be placed in the Library of the House. Copies have also been sent to the social security advisory committee. In view of the widespread interest in the single payments regulations, I have decided to publish the report and copies are available to the public (price £1·70) from my Department's leaflet unit at Canons Park.

    Cervical Cancer

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what provision he intends to make for computers to recall women for a screening test for cervical cancer.

    I am pleased to announce today, details of a computer scheme to provide local recall arrangements for cervical cancer screening. The Department and the Department of Industry are making £500,000 available to regional health authorities for the purchase of mirco computers for cervical cytology recall. Each regional health authority in England will be offered at least one micro computer to be used by a family practitioner committee for recalling women due for a cervical smear.It is important that women at risk of cervical cancer are examined regularly. The introduction of computers will help ensure that women who have had a cervical smear will be recalled regularly every five years. This initiative shows the Government's commitment to preventive medicine and, in particular, cervical cancer screening.Each of the 14 regional health authorities in England will be offered one micro computer, with a second one as funds permit for the regions where proportionately fewer women have in the past been included in the cervical screening programme in the order Mersey, South Western, Northern, West Midlands, East Anglia and Yorkshire. The regional health authority, in consultation with the district health authorities and family practitioner Committees, will allocate the micro computer to a family practitioner committee which will run a local recall scheme. The computers are expected to be in use towards the end of the year.Government funds will pay for the development of a computer system at the Exeter family practitioner service computer unit and will meet most of the installation and maintenance costs for three years of the micro computers to be allocated. Health authorities will be expected to spend up to £3,000 per micro computer installation as a contribution towards these costs. The same software package will be available free of charge for cervical cytology recall elsewhere but health authorities will have to buy the hardware at normal prices.

    Numbers of patients on in-patient waiting lists
    England
    Urgent casesNon-urgent cases
    Date and SpecialtyTotalOn list for more than one monthTotalOn list for more than one yearTotal Cases
    31 March 1978
    Geriatrics1,5566043,7062695,262
    Mental illness4433031,4413681,884
    Mental handicap6806571,8341,5172,514
    Child and adolescent psychiatry454128832333
    30 September 1978
    Geriatrics1,2726793,2803174,552
    Mental illness5593001,4092381,968
    Mental handicap6696491,8781,5472,547
    Child and adolescent psychiatry291726634295
    31 March 1979
    Geriatrics1,7468004,3113186,057
    Mental illness4752391,6683462,143
    Mental handicap5475281,8201,4592,367
    Child and adolescent psychiatry503425429304
    30 September 1982
    Geriatrics7423882,3352843,077
    Mental illness5474191,8614622,408
    Mental handicap3263151,5501,3651,876
    Child and adolescent psychiatry24171285152

    Responsibility for operating the scheme for recalling women in priority groups—all those over 35 and those under 35 who have been pregnant on three or more occasions—who are due for a further cervical smear test is currently being transferred from the National Health Service central register to district health authorities. Many district health authorities are likely to use family practitioner committees as their agents.

    Hospital Waiting Times

    asked how many people were on hospital waiting lists for (a) renal failure treatment, (b) geriatric care, (c) mental illness, (d) mental handicap and (e) child and adolescent psychiatry; and how many of these had been waiting for (i) over six months and (ii) over one year (1) at the latest available date, (2) in May 1979 and (3) in 1978.

    [pursuant to his reply, 10 May 1983, c. 267–8]: There is no waiting list for treatment for chronic renal failure since by the nature of this condition patients will die within a few weeks unless placed on a dialysis or given a kidney transplant. I understand that the number of patients in the United Kingdom who were on dialysis and had been notified to the United Kingdom transplant service as awaiting a kidney transplant were as follows:

    Numbers
    1 May 19781,192
    1 May 19791,266
    1 May 19832,332
    Information as to the length of time spent awaiting a transplant is not available in the form requested.Information on other waiting lists is not held centrally in the form requested. The available information is given in the following table: