Written Answers To Questions
Tuesday 12 July 1983
Education And Science
Holy Family Primary School, Leeds
37.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will approve the resources requested for the renovation of the Holy Family Roman Catholic primary school, Leeds.
I understand that the governors' architects intend to submit revised plans for this work to the Department before the end of July. I then expect to be able to make an early decision on this matter.
| Net recurrent institutional expenditure per pupil during the period 1975–1981, at November 1981 prices was (£): | |||||||
| 1975–76 | 1976–77 | 1977–78 | 1978–79 | 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | |
| Primary School Pupils | 535 | 549 | 559 | 581 | 602 | 610 | 618 |
| Secondary School Pupils | |||||||
| (a) under school leaving age | 780 | 781 | 783 | 800 | 811 | 817 | 824 |
| (b) over school leaving age | 1,411 | 1,415 | 1,409 | 1,432 | 1,436 | 1,386 | 1,323 |
Assington School
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will review his decision on the future of Assington School in light of the evidence provided by the parents of children at the school.
No. My right hon. Friend has no power to alter decisions under section 12 of the Education Act 1980 once taken.
Nationalised Industries
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list in the Official Report all nationalised industries, whether statutory corporations, companies, or trading bodies of any sort, in which the Government now have any financial interest or for which they may make financial provision, in whole or part, for which he is the sponsoring Minister; and if he will list all subsidiaries or divisions of those industries which may carry on business under a different name from that of the parent nationalised industry.
None of the nationalised industries as specified in Part 3 of the Government's Public Expenditure White Paper (Cmnd. 8789) operates under the sponsorship of the Department.
Employment
Enterprise Allowance Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will place in the Library copies of all
Education Standards
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what recent representations he has received regarding the maintenance of educational standards in Hertfordshire.
Since my hon. Friend's last such inquiry on 20 October 1982, five letters have been received from hon. Members and others. Hertfordshire in common with many other authorities has responded constructively to pressures on its financial resources, and shares the Government's commitment to providing the highest standard of education from the resources available.
Pupil Costs
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list the cost in 1983 prices of the average primary, secondary and sixth form education per pupil for each of the last 10 years.
It is not possible to give the information either in the exact form or for the period requested. However, the available information is as follows:documents relating to the enterprise allowance scheme
(a) for public distribution and (b) for use by local office staff when responding to enquiries.
I have arranged for copies of all the relevant published documents to be placed in the Library.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what instructions he has given to local offices concerning the release of information about the enterprise allowance scheme prior to 1 August; and if he will make a statement.
Jobcentres were asked to inform those inquiring about the national extension of the enterprise allowance scheme that the basic eligibility conditions will remain broadly the same as in the experimental scheme and to invite them to leave their names and addresses so that more detailed information could be sent to them when available. A new leaflet giving full details of the extended scheme was distributed to jobcentres on 8 July.
Labour Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many and what percentage of men unemployed for (a) over six months, (b) over one year, and (c) over two years, were over 60 years at the latest count; and what percentage of the male work force aged over 60 years these figures represent.
The following table gives at 14 April, the latest date for which the information is available, the numbers of unemployed male claimants aged 60 years and over in the United Kingdom who had been unemployed for the lengths of time specified and expresses these as percentages of the corresponding numbers of unemployed males of all ages. The figures reflect the first effects of the provision in the 1983 Budget for men aged 60 and over no longer having to sign on at an unemployment benefit office solely to secure national insurance credits. The effect was to exclude from the April count some 4,000 in the up to 52 weeks group, 11,000 in the over 52 and up to 104 weeks group and 14,000 in the over 104 weeks group.
| Males aged 60 years and over | ||
| Duration of unemployment | Number | Percentage of all males in group |
| Over 26 and up to 52 weeks | 47,295 | 9·5 |
| Over 52 and up to 104 weeks | 61,838 | 12·9 |
| Over 104 weeks | 59,155 | 13·1 |
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the total number of registered unemployed people in the United Kingdom; and what is the latest estimate of the number of unemployed people who are not registered as such.
The June number of unemployed claimants in the United Kingdom was 2,983,921. Not included in this total were 128,433 new school leavers registered at careers offices who are not yet entitled to benefit.This Department estimates that in Great Britain in 1981, the latest date for which such estimates are available, some 400,000 people who had no jobs were seeking work but were not registered as unemployed. The 1981 labour force survey estimates that, at that time, a similar number of the registered unemployed were not actively looking for work. The 1983 labour force survey will yield corresponding information about job seekers not entitled to unemployment benefit, in place of that above about the unregistered unemployed.
Health And Safety At Work Etc Act
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will introduce legislation to amend the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act so that normal English summer temperatures may not be regarded as causing unfit working conditions in offices.
Section 6 of the Offices, Shops and Railway Premises Act 1963 requires that a reasonable temperature is maintained in every room in which people are employed other than for short periods. Except in quite unusual and extreme circumstances, English summer weather will not produce unreasonable working conditions in offices. It is almost invariably an abuse if high temperatures are taken as an excuse for not working, especially if the public are inconvenienced.
Equal Pay
asked the Secretary of State for Employment which organisations have submitted to him objections to the draft Equal Pay (Amendment) Regulations.
A consultative draft of the regulations was published in February on which we received comments from the following organisations:—
- Equal Opportunities Commission.
- CBI.
- TUC.
- Scottish TUC.
- Association of British Chambers of Commerce.
- Association of County Councils.
- Association of Metropolitan Authorities.
- Association of Professional, Executive, Clerical and Computer Staff (APEX).
- Association of Women Solicitors.
- Birmingham Chamber of Industry and Commerce.
- British Carpet Manufacturers' Association Ltd.
- British Clothing Industry Association Ltd.
- British Federation of University Women.
- British Youth Council.
- City Women's Network.
- Conservative Women's National Committee.
- Council on Tribunals.
- Educational Institute of Scotland.
- Engineering Employers' Federation.
- Equal Pay and Opportunity Campaign.
- Fawcett Society.
- Greater London Council.
- Greater London Employers' Secretariat.
- Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers.
- Institute of Personnel Management.
- Knitting Industries' Federation Ltd.
- Law Society of Scotland.
- League of Jewish Women.
- Local Authorities' Conditions of Service Advisory Board.
- Low Pay Unit.
- Medical Women's Federation.
- National Association of Local Government Officers.
- National Chamber of Trade.
- National Council for Civil Liberties.
- National Council of Women of Great Britain.
- National Graphical Association.
- Rights of Women.
- Soroptomist International of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
- United Kingdom Federation of Business and Professional Women.
- A Woman's Place.
- Women in Media.
- Women's Gas Federation and Young Home Makers.
- Women's National Commission.
- Women's Technology Scheme.
Home Department
Nationality Fees
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he expects to be able to write to the hon. and learned Member for Leicester, West concerning the use to which he intends to put the profit resulting from the increase in nationality fees since April 1982.
My right hon. and learned Friend is considering the assertion that a profit has arisen since April 1982 in the overall context of the third report of the Home Affairs Committee — Session 1982–83. I will write to the hon. and learned Member as soon as I can after this consideration is completed.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many representations he has received during the past 12 months concerning fees for British citizenship; and from whom.
In the 12 months from July 1982 to June 1983 we have received 46 letters from Members and former Members of this House and from members of the public about citizenship fees. In addition, 26 letters have been received from various organisations.
Registration And Nationalisation
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will take steps to reduce the present backlog of applications for registration and naturalisation.
Despite the unprecedented surge of some 70,200 applications between November 1982 and April 1983, the number of outstanding applications is no greater than it was a year ago. We shall keep up our efforts to reduce the number of outstanding cases by seeking ways to improve and simplify procedures. The recommendations of the third report of the Home Affairs Committee —Session 1982–83—are now being considered in this context.
War Planning (Food And Drugs)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what type of regional or other planning has been set up for the control of sources and distribution of food and drugs in the event of war.
Plans in the event of war are contained in the Home Office ES circulars 1/1977 and 1/1979 which are in the Library of the House.
Services (Control)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what contingency plans have been set up by him in the event of the breakdown of present plans for the control of services.
Contingency plans exist for the maintenance of essential supplies in a variety of emergencies. A number of these are described in the Home Office ES circulars which are in the Library of the House.
Nuclear Attack (Emergency Services)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make specific contingency plans for emergency services in the event of nuclear attack for areas where there are United States nuclear bases.
The emergency services make their own plans in consultation with local authorities and other responsible organisations.
Murder Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many persons sent to special hospitals for murder and subsequently discharged are known to have committed a second murder; and how many committed a second murder while in a special hospital, in each case in each of the last 30 years.
In England and Wales during the last 30 years, three persons charged with murder—one found insane on arraignment and two found guilty but insane —and ordered to be detained in a special hospital were subsequently convicted of manslaughter after being discharged from hospital. Two persons were convicted of manslaughter for the second time while detained in a special hospital.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list in the Official Report details of the number of cases during the past five years where convicted murderers, having been sentenced to terms of imprisonment, have subsequently been found to be wrongly convicted and where they have been released.
The conviction for murder of Mr. Albert Edward Taylor in April 1974 was quashed by the Court of Appeal in March 1979, the case having been referred to the court under section 17 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968, and he was released from prison.I should perhaps also mention the case of Mr. David Cooper and Mr. Michael Graham McMahon, although they were not found to have been wrongly convicted. Together with Mr. Patrick Murphy, whose conviction was quashed by the Court of Appeal in 1973 on a reference under section 17 of the 1968 Act, they were convicted in March 1970 of the murder of a Luton sub-postmaster and sentenced to life imprisonment. In July 1980 my noble Friend, then Home Secretary, having regard to the widely felt sense of unease about the case, recommended the exercise of the royal prerogative of mercy to effect the remission of the remainder of their sentences.
Scotland
Public Expenditure
38.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on the likely effect on Scotland of the expenditure proposals made by the Chancellor of the Exchequer on Thursday 7 July.
I expect the total adjustments to the central Government cash limits and nationalised industries' external financing limits for which I am responsible to be around £40 million.
Scottish Development Agency
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will take steps to ensure that the Scottish Development Agency is allowed to continue to make units available with rent-free periods in the Glasgow area to approved firms.
It remains the Government's policy that the Scottish Development Agency should have the discretion to grant rent-free periods for its factories in appropriate circumstances.
Enterprise Zones
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list the firms which have established themselves, or are in the process of establishing themselves, in enterprise zones in Scotland; and how many employees each firm has, or will have, in the zones.
Clydebank is the only enterprise zone which has so far been designated in Scotland. The second report of the enterprise zone monitoring study which was published in April shows that in the period up to 31 December 1982, 116 firms providing a total of 1,102 jobs had established themselves in the zone.Information about employment in individual firms was gathered in confidence and the figures about jobs in each firm cannot be released.A note of the firms which had established themselves in the Clydebank zone is included in the list of firms for all the first group of zones in the United Kingdom which is being sent to my hon. Friend by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment.
Right-To-Buy
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list for each housing authority and new town in Scotland and the Scottish Special Housing Association the percentage of their housing stock to which section 1(7) of the Tenants' Rights, Etc. (Scotland) Act 1980 relates.
This information is not available in precisely the form requested (i.e. houses first let after 15 May 1975). The table below shows the percentage of the housing authority stock completed since July 1975:
| Local authorities | Percentage of housing authority stock completed after 1 July 1975 |
| Berwickshire | 20·7 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 11·5 |
| Roxburgh | 9·9 |
| Tweedale | 6·6 |
| Clackmannan | 3·9 |
| Falkirk | 6·2 |
| Stirling | 3·6 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 22·6 |
| Nithsdale | 6·3 |
| Stewartry | 18·2 |
| Wigtown | 12·2 |
| Dunfermline | 5·0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 5·4 |
| North East Fife | 10·6 |
| City of Aberdeen | 12·7 |
| Banff and Buchan | 23·3 |
| Gordon | 28·2 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 21·6 |
| Moray | 21·2 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 28·1 |
| Caithness | 12·4 |
| Inverness | 15·0 |
| Lochaber | 10·9 |
| Nairn | 16·4 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 22·8 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 24·8 |
| Sutherland | 16·0 |
| East Lothian | 4·7 |
| City of Edinburgh | 2·5 |
| Midlothian | 3·6 |
| West Lothian | 1·4 |
| Argyll and Bute | 12·3 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 19·3 |
Local authorities
| Percentage of housing authority stock completed after 1 July 1975
|
| Clydebank | 2·7 |
| Clydesdale | 5·1 |
| Cumbemauld and Kilsyth | 3·8 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 4·1 |
| Cunninghame | 4·3 |
| Dumbarton | 2·1 |
| East Kilbride | 1·7 |
| Eastwood | 20·5 |
| City of Glasgow | 4·5 |
| Hamilton | 3·7 |
| Inverclyde | 3·4 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 4·0 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 9·8 |
| Monklands | 1·0 |
| Motherwell | 3·0 |
| Renfrew | 2·9 |
| Strathkelvin | 5·8 |
| Angus | 7·2 |
| City of Dundee | 2·8 |
| Perth and Kinross | 7·5 |
| Orkney Islands Area | 34·0 |
| Shetland Islands Area | 37·3 |
| Western Isles Islands Area | 27·5 |
New Towns
| |
| Cumbernauld | 27·0 |
| East Kilbride | 11·2 |
| Glenrothes | 31·4 |
| Irvine | 66·7 |
| Livingston | 50·9 |
| SSHA | 14·0 |
Artificial Limbs
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) in Each of the last three years how many prostheses manufactured overseas were supplied by the limb service in Scotland;(2) if he will give brief descriptions of all prostheses supplied by overseas manufacturers in the last 12 months through the limb service in Scotland.
No complete prostheses have been supplied by overseas manufacturers to the limb service in Scotland. However a range of components manufactured overseas have been used in the last three years by contractors who supply prostheses in Scotland.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the Government's policy with regard to the supply by the Scottish artificial limb service of prostheses manufactured overseas where no limb of a comparable design or containing comparable materials is available from British manufacturers.
A prosthesis containing components on non-British manufacture would normally be supplied by the Scottish artificial limb service where this would be of more benefit to the patient than the standard British-made limb.
Labour Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many persons have been registered unemployed for more than (a) 52 weeks and (b) two years in each of the regions in Scotland for each quarter since January 1982.
[pursuant to his reply, 29 June 1983, c. 84.]: The information is set out in the table below. The figures for 1982 are based on the number of unemployed registrants at jobcentres and careers offices (the old basis of the unemployment count) and those for
| Unemployment in Scotland | |||||||
| Registrants 1982 | Claimants | ||||||
| 1982 | 1983 | ||||||
| January | April | July | October | October | January | April | |
| Highland | |||||||
| more than 52 weeks | 2,425 | 2,517 | 2,599 | 3,005 | 2,264 | 2,659 | 2,953 |
| more than 104 weeks | 1,005 | 1,018 | 1,057 | 1,233 | 952 | 1,078 | 1,143 |
| Shetland | |||||||
| more than 52 weeks | 64 | 69 | 93 | 90 | 82 | 110 | 123 |
| more than 104 weeks | 29 | 35 | 35 | 36 | 38 | 39 | 39 |
| Orkney | |||||||
| more than 52 weeks | 198 | 209 | 220 | 263 | 214 | 258 | 270 |
| more than 104 weeks | 80 | 87 | 99 | 111 | 96 | 125 | 134 |
| Western Isles | |||||||
| more than 52 weeks | 462 | 456 | 539 | 597 | 472 | 573 | 545 |
| more than 104 weeks | 136 | 153 | 163 | 204 | 181 | 196 | 189 |
| Grampian | |||||||
| more than 52 weeks | 3,084 | 3,330 | 3,524 | 4,054 | 2,875 | 3,414 | 3,659 |
| more than 104 weeks | 935 | 1,015 | 1,236 | 1,390 | 1,142 | 1,346 | 1,416 |
| Tayside | |||||||
| more than 52 weeks | 7,399 | 7,901 | 8,292 | 8,971 | 7,618 | 8,334 | 8,560 |
| more than 104 weeks | 2,651 | 3,001 | 3,376 | 3,939 | 3,411 | 3,926 | 4,175 |
| Fife | |||||||
| more than 52 weeks | 4,835 | 5,044 | 5,442 | 5,823 | 5,160 | 5,779 | 5,767 |
| more than 104 weeks | 1,618 | 1,758 | 2,038 | 2,390 | 2,174 | 2,542 | 2,592 |
| Strathclyde | |||||||
| more than 52 weeks | 65,891 | 69,048 | 75,426 | 79,824 | 69,656 | 75,242 | 77,219 |
| more than 104 weeks | 25,884 | 28,810 | 33,133 | 36,920 | 33,469 | 37,691 | 40,051 |
| Lothian | |||||||
| more than 52 weeks | 11,480 | 12,529 | 13,687 | 15,483 | 12,508 | 13,958 | 14,742 |
| more than 104 weeks | 3,973 | 4,353 | 5,043 | 6,144 | 5,153 | 6,105 | 6,465 |
| Central | |||||||
| more than 52 weeks | 4,441 | 4,954 | 5,332 | 6,049 | 5,082 | 5,883 | 6,073 |
| more than 104 weeks | 1,223 | 1,401 | 1,745 | 2,269 | 2,094 | 2,406 | 2,614 |
| Dumfries/Galloway | |||||||
| more than 52 weeks | 2,346 | 2,485 | 2,599 | 2,691 | 2,285 | 2,630 | 2,685 |
| more than 104 weeks | 965 | 1,015 | 1,068 | 1,158 | 1,049 | 1,177 | 1,236 |
| Borders | |||||||
| more than 52 weeks | 817 | 887 | 869 | 987 | 895 | 1,034 | 1,087 |
| more than 104 weeks | 202 | 214 | 245 | 341 | 367 | 427 | 462 |
Note:
The figures for more than 52 weeks also include those who have been unemployed for more than 104 weeks.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many notified job vacancies there were in each employment office in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area in April and May 1983 and 1982, respectively.
[pursuant to his reply, 6 July 1983, c. 124]: The table below shows for each jobcentre in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area the number of notified vacancies which were unfilled on the day of the count in April and May 1982 and 1983 respectively.
1983 on the number of unemployed claimants at unemployment benefit offices (the new basis of the count). The table includes figures for October 1982 on both bases for purposes of comparison.
Ufilled vacancies in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area
| ||||
April 1982
| May 1982
| April 1983
| May 1983
| |
| Edinburgh (includes Leith and Portabello) | 1,503 | 1,572 | 1,488 | 1,573 |
| Loanhead | 47 | 22 | 33 | 44 |
| Musselburgh | 36 | 39 | 84 | 103 |
| Penicuik | 38 | 36 | 33 | 32 |
| Dalkeith | 72 | 78 | 184 | 63 |
Note: The number of vacancies in the three Edinburgh, Leith and Portabello jobcentres cannot be separately identified.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many oung people, aged 18 years and under, were unemployed in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area; and how many were on special employment projects in May 1983.
[pursuant to his reply, 6 July 1983, c. 124]: On 14 April 1983, the latest date for which information is available, there were 4,518 unemployed claimants aged 18 years and under in the Edinburgh travelto-work area.I regret that information on the number of young people on schemes run by the Manpower Services Commission in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area is not readily available and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. It is estimated, however, that at the end of May 1983 approximately 2,720 young people were participating in the youth opportunities programme in Lothian.
Note: The Edinburgh travel-to-work area comprises the jobcentre areas of Edinburgh, Leith, Portabello, Dalkeith, Loanhead, Musselburgh and Penicuik.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the percentage increase in unemployment in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area and Scotland, respectively, from May 1979 to May 1983.
[pursuant to his reply, 6 July 1983, c. 124]: The percentage increase in unemployment in Scotland from May 1979 to May 1983 was 111·3 per cent. this figure is based on an estimate of the number of unemployed claimants — the new basis of the unemployment count—in Scotland at May 1979. It is not possible, however, to estimate the number of unemployed claimants at May 1979 for travel-to-work areas within Scotland; comparable figures for the Edinburgh travel-to-work area are therefore not available.The table below for the Edinburgh travel-to-work area gives the number of unemployed registrants at jobcentres and carreers offices—the old basis of the count—at May 1979 and the number of unemployed claimants at May 1983. Figures on both cases for October 1982 are included for the purpose of comparison.
| Unemployment in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area | |
| Total | |
| May 1979 (registrants) | 15,634 |
| October 1982 (registrants) | 35,235 |
| October 1982 (claimants) | 31,076 |
| May 1983 (claimants) | 30,303 |
Nationalised Industries
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list in the Official Report, all nationalised industries, whether statutory corporations, companies, or trading bodies of any sort, in which the Government now has any financial interest or for which it may make financial provision, in whole or part, for which he is the sponsoring Minister; and if he will list all subsidiaries or divisions of those industries which may carry on business under a different name from that of the parent nationalised industry.
My right hon. Friend is responsible for three nationalised industries: the South of Scotland Electricity Board, the North of Scotland Hydro-Electric Board and the Scottish Transport Group. The electricity boards have no subsidiaries and listed below are those owned by the Scottish Transport Group:
- Scottish Bus Group Limited
- W. Alexander & Sons (Fife) Ltd.
- W. Alexander & Sons (Midland) Ltd.
- W. Alexander & Sons (Northern) Ltd.
- Central SMT Co. Ltd.
- Highland Omnibuses Ltd.
- Scottish Omnibuses Ltd.
- Western SMT Co. Ltd.
- Caledonian MacBrayne Ltd.
- Scottish Transport Investments Ltd.
- MacBrayne Haulage Ltd.
- Sanderson Travel Service Ltd.
- Dryburgh Abbey Hotel Ltd.
- STG Information and Market Services Ltd.
- The SMT Insurance Co. Ltd.
- SMT Insurance (Brokerage) Ltd.
Trade And Industry
Coal Imports
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1) what was the total amount of coal imported to the United Kingdom from (a) the United States, (b) Canada, (c) Australia, (d) Africa, (e) Poland and (f) the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in 1981, 1982 and to the nearest available date in 1983;(2) how many tons of coal have been imported to Scotland from the United States of America during the past 12 months.
On the assumption that the hon. Member's question refers to South Africa rather than to African countries in general, the available information is as follows:
| United Kingdom imports of coal from specified countries | |||
| (tonnes) | |||
| 1981 | 1982 | January-April 1983 | |
| Consigned from: | |||
| USA | 1,933,471 | 1,927,210 | 427,508 |
| Canada | 104 | 30 | 76 |
| Australia | 1,799,879 | 1,131,701 | 338,492 |
| South Africa | 77,178 | 62,869 | 8,009 |
| Poland | 142,225 | 316,624 | 46,474 |
| USSR | — | 8,459 | 1,970 |
Source: Data corresponding to SITC (R2) Sub-groups 322·1 and 322·2 in the United Kingdom Overseas Trade Statistics.
Note: Imports having Scotland as their final destination are not identifiable as the statistics of overseas trade are compiled only for the United Kingdom as a whole.
Microelectric Applications Project
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many companies at the latest count have applied for support under the microelectric applications project scheme in (a) Leeds, (b) Yorkshire/Humberside and (c) each other region; what is the total value of the applications from Leeds and the Yorkshire region, respectively; and how many have been approved.
There have been 151 applications from the Yorkshire and Humberside region for support under the microelectronics application project of projects totalling £16·5 million; 65 of these have been approved, and 14 are under consideration at present. Corresponding figures from Leeds are 24 applications (£2 million), with 10 approvals.The numbers of applications from other regions are: north-east 56; north-west 182; west midlands 166; east midlands 139; south-east 1,147; south-west 182; Scotland 108; Wales 47.
Public Telephone Services
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, whether, before the passage of the Telecommunications Bill, he will make a statement on Her Majesty's Government's policy towards the balance between commercial viability and social obligation in the provision of public telephone services.
The Government's policy is to ensure that after the privatisation of British Telecom loss-making but socially essential services, including the 999 emergency service, public call box services, ship-to-shore services and services in remote rural areas should continue to be made available on a secure financial basis.The Telecommunications Bill therefore imposes duties on the Secretary of State and on the new Director General of Telecommunications to exercise their licensing and other functions in the way best calculated both to secure that these services are provided and to secure that those who provide these services are able to finance them.The Secretary of State intends to fulfil these two duties by including in the licence to be granted to public telecommunication operators conditions which will ensure that those operators provide emergency 999 services, public call box services, ship-to-shore services and services in rural areas.The main burden of meeting these obligations will fall on British Telecom and will be met out of profits on other services. In order to ensure that the arrangements are fair the Government intend that the other public tele-communication operators should pay a share of the losses BT incurs on these services through a system of access fees which will be payable when those operators are provided with services by BT.The Government's policy is to provide a balance between commercial viability and the universal provision of telecommunications services. The Telecommunications Bill therefore imposes a primary duty on the Secretary of State and the Director General of Telecommunications to secure the universal provision of telecommunications services, including emergency services, public call box services, ship-to-shore services and services in rural areas, and to secure that any person providing these services is able to finance their provision. Conditions will be imposed in the licences which the Government will issue to all public telecommunications operators with access to the systems over which these essential services will be provided to contribute towards any losses incurred in their provision. This will ensure that an obligation on a particular licencee to provide loss making but essential services, which the Government are determined to continue, will not be a barrier to fair competition.
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what is the average capital cost of installing a public telephone kiosk; and what level of annual takings British Telecom expects to receive in respect of such a kiosk.
This is a detailed matter for the board of British Telecom and I am inviting British Telecom to write to the hon. Member on these points.
West Midlands
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what new schemes his west midlands regional office is at present considering involving new technology and new products; and what grants have already been made by his Department to help west midlands firms in these areas.
The Government have already introduced generally a comprehensive range of schemes to encourage the use of new technology some of them such as the small engineering firms investment scheme being of particular applicability to areas such as the west midlands. The purpose of the Department's initiative in the region is not to introduce new schemes specific to it, but to ensure that firms there take the maximum advantage of what is already available. The criteria of some schemes such as the manufacturing advisory service have been revised in the region to meet the particular needs of firms there. I will write to the hon. Member about the grants which have been made as soon as possible.
Inmos (Privatisation)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he has received any proposals for the privatisation of Inmos or its sale to a foreign company; and if he will make a statement.
It is for the BTG to consider proposals for the disposal of their holding in Inmos. The policy is that it should dispose of all its holdings to private ownership as soon as commercially practicable.
Nationalised Industries
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will list in the Official Report, all nationalised industries, whether statutory corporations, companies, or trading bodies of any sort, in which the Government now have any financial interest or for which they may make financial provision, in whole or part, for which he is the sponsoring Minister; and if he will list all subsidiaries or divisions of those industries which may carry on business under a different name from that of the parent nationalised industry.
My Department sponsors four nationalised industries: British Telecom, British Shipbuilders, British Steel Corporation and the Post Office. The information requested is contained in the annual report and accounts of the respective corporations.
The Arts
Theatre Museum
asked the Under-Secretary of State answering in respect of the arts, when he expects to commence building of the theatre museum; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 7 July 1983, c. 176]: My noble Friend, the Minister for the Arts, is not yet in a position to say when building work will start on the theatre museum at Covent Garden. As in other areas, its timing will be affected by the Government's 1983–84 cash limit reductions announced on 7 July. My noble Friend is considering the detailed implications of these for the arts and libraries programme.
National Finance
Capital Gains Tax
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the reason for the difference between the basic capital gains tax allowances for individuals and for beneficiaries of a trust.
I assume that my hon. Friend is referring to the difference between the capital gains tax annual exemption for individuals, at present £5,300, and the similar exemption for trustees, at present £2,650. An individual who is a beneficiary under a trust, as well as having assets of his own, could benefit from the full amount of both exemptions in the same year; and if the exemption were the same amount in each case, individuals who were also trust beneficiaries could gain an unfair advantage. On the other hand, if there were no trust exemption at all, an individual all of whose assets were held in trust would be disadvantaged. The trust exemption is set at half the individual exemption in order to strike a balance between these possibilities.
Exchange Rate
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he makes any estimate of the effect on the exchange rate of changes in the rate of interest relative to those of other countries.
The effects of changes in relative interest rates on the exchange rate are both highly uncertain and likely to vary. They will very much depend upon the circumstances prevailing when the change to interest rates takes place. No precise answer can therefore be given.
Financial Statistics (International Companies)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will give, for 1979 onwards, information on the savings ratio and manufacturing output in the United Kingdom and Germany in the manner of the answer of 12 March 1980, Official Report, c. 569–70; and if he will include figures for the United States of America and Japan.
The latest available information is given in the following tables.
Saving ratio
| |||
1979
| 1980
| 1981
| |
Net* | |||
| United Kingdom | 10·1 | 7·8 | 5·7 |
| Germany (Fed. Rep.) | 13·5 | 12·0 | 10·0 |
| United States of America | 8·6 | 5·7 | 6·3 |
| Japan | 21·3 | 21·0 | 20·9 |
Gross† | |||
| United Kingdom | 20·5 | 19·1 | 17·4 |
| Germany (Fed. Rep.) | 23·4 | 22·4 | 21·2 |
| United States of America | 20·0 | 18·1 | 18·6 |
| Japan | 31·8 | 31·6 | 31·7 |
| * Ratio of total net saving (after deducting capital consumption) to net national disposable income. | |||
| † Ratio of total gross saving to gross national disposable income. | |||
Source: OECD National Accounts Main Aggregates 1952–1981.
Manufacturing output Percentage change on preceding year
| ||||
1979
| 1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
| United Kingdom | +0·3 | -8·5 | -6·3 | -1·0 |
| Germany (Fed· Rep) | +5·4 | — | -1·7 | -2·6 |
| United States of America | +4·7 | -4·5 | +2·5 | -8·5 |
| Japan | +7·4 | +4·8 | +0·9 | +0·4 |
Source: United Kingdom—latest estimates
Other countries—OECD Main Economic Indicators
Motoring (Taxes)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much was raised by taxation on cars and petrol in the last year for which figures are available.
It is estimated that in 1982–83 the taxation of cars and petrol raised about £8.300 million.
Government Assets (Sale)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will seek to establish a capital fund into which the proceeds of the sale of Government assets will be placed in order to ensure that capital assets will not be used to defray current expenditure.
I shall let my right hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.
Nationalised Industries
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list in the Official Report, all nationalised industries, whether statutory corporations, companies, or trading bodies of any sort, in which the Government now have any financial interest or for which they may make financial provision, in whole or part, for which he is the sponsoring Minister; and if he will list all subsidiaries or divisions of those industries which may carry on business under a different name from that of the parent nationalised industry.
I shall let my hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.
Banking Statistics
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what share of clearing banking was represented by the top four clearing banks in 1951, 1961, 1971 and 1981, respectively.
[pursuant to the reply, 11 July 1983, c. 254]: I regret that this information is not readily available in the form requested and could only be obtained at disproportionate expense.
Defence
Defence Expenditure
6.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what percentage of the gross nationl product has been spent on defence in each of the last three years; and how this compares with the record of the United Kingdom's main allies.
On NATO definitions, the United Kingdom spent 5·1 per cent. of its GDP on defence in 1980, 4·9 per cent. in 1981 and 5·1 per cent. in 1982. By comparison, in 1982 the United States spent some 6½ per cent. and our major European allies some 3½ per cent. For further details I refer my hon. Friend to the Statement on the Defence Estimates which I published last week.
Gibraltar
10.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the total number of service personnel serving in Gibraltar.
There are some 1,770 United Kingdom personnel stationed on Gibraltar. In addition, there are about 225 Royal Naval personnel serving at sea but based in Gibraltar, some 105 members of the Royal Naval Reserve and about 260 personnel of the Gibraltar Regiment.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will provide additional aircraft, guns, missiles and surveillance radar in Gibraltar for the defence of the Straits of Gibraltar.
I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Beverley (Sir P. Wall) on 27 June.—[Vol. 44, c. 33.]
Falkland Islands
19.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many military personnel ate currently in the Falkland garrison; and what effect this level of deployment will have on the overall defence establishment.
At present, the Falklands garrison comprises over 3,000 personnel ashore. We are taking measures, including adjustments to manning levels, to offset this additional commitment.
22.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he is satisfied with the standard of accommodation available to all service men in the Falklands.
As my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister said on 28 June, the conditions under which our service men are serving in the Falkland Islands are continuously being improved. The provision of coastels has enhanced the accommodation available, and other facilities for the longer term are being studied.
23.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what responsibilities his Department will excercise in relation to the building of the new Falkland Islands airport.
My Department is responsible for formulating the defence requirement for a strategic airfield in the Falkland Islands and allocating the necessary funds and also for the ordering, supply and installation of electronic equipment. The Property Services Agency of the Department of the Environment is responsible for all aspects of construction.
Royal Hospital School, Holbrook
20.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he will announce his decision on the future of the Royal Hospital school, Holbrook.
My noble Friend Lord Trefgarne chaired a meeting of the committee of management of the Royal Hospital school on 29 June which decided that the school should remain at Holbrook, near Ipswich.
Cyprus
21.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what payments are being made in respect of the use of British bases in Cyprus.
None.
Defence Equipment (Sales)
24.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has for improving the "two way street" of reciprocal sales of defence equipment between the United Kingdom and the United States of America.
Since 1978 when the balance of defence trade was 4:1 in favour of the United States it has improved to around 2:1 for the last two years. British defence equipment manufacturers have been competing successfully in United States defence programmes and we shall continue to encourage and support them in this activity. We shall also continue to remind the American Administration that United Kingdom firms should be allowed to compete without restriction in United States programmes in the spirit of the 1975 Memorandum of Understanding.
29.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what are the total sales recorded to the most recent date for which statistics are available of British defence exports to United States Government contracts and of American defence exports to British Government contracts under the current memorandum of understanding between the two countries.
The balance of trade in defence equipment between the United States and Britain has stood at around 2:1 in favour of the United States for the last two years, but it has not been the practice of this or previous Governments to publish detailed figures for our defence trade with individual countries.
Type 23 Frigates
25.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the ordering practice relating to equipment for the type 23 frigate.
Wherever possible, competitive tenders are sought from industry and contracts awareded to the firm which can meet essential naval requirements most effectively at the lowest cost.
Combat Aircraft
26.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he will now state a requirement for a new combat aircraft for the Royal Air Force.
I have nothing to add to the answer I gave the hon. Member on 1 February 1983.— [Vol. 36, c. 67.]
Cruise Missiles
27.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence when he now expects cruise missiles to be deployed in Great Britain.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave earlier today to his hon. Friend the Member for Sheffield, Hillsborough (Mr. Flannery).
30.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what recent representations he has received over the installation of cruise missiles in the United Kingdom.
Since the beginning of May I have received nearly 40 letters from Members of Parliament and from members of the public on matters relating to the deployment of United States cruise missiles in this country.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence when he now expects the first cruise missiles to arrive in Great Britain.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave earlier today to his hon. Friend the Member for Sheffield, Hillsborough (Mr. Flannery).
Harm And Alarm Systems
28.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he is now in a position to make a decision between the HARM and ALARM systems for the Royal Air Force.
34.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what decision he has come to on the new anti-radar missile for the Royal Air Force.
I refer my hon. Friends to the answer I gave earlier today, to our hon. Friend the Member for Ribble, South (Mr. Atkins).
Naval Ship Design
31.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what representations he has received concerning changed priorities in naval ship design, particularly with reference to the new type 23 frigates.
We continue to receive a significant number of representations from hon. Members and from the general public about warship design. During the past year many of these representations have been concerned with fire hazards in ships and with reducing such dangers in new classes such as the type 23.
Departmental Land (Shoeburyness)
32.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what progress has been made in transferring surplus Ministry land in Shoeburyness to the Southend borough council; and if he will make a statement.
Negotiations with Southend borough council over the lease of 85 acres are continuing. There has been some delay because of the presence within the area of a site of special scientific interest, the exact boundary of which is still under discussion with the Nature Conservancy Council.
Argentine (Arms Sales)
33.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he has any plans to discuss with other European Community Defence Ministers their supply of arms to Argentina.
European Community Governments are fully aware of our continuing concern over the supply of arms to Argentina. We shall continue to approach our allies on particular types of equipment as and when appropriate.
Redundancies
35.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many compulsory redundancies he expects to make from the Royal Navy, the Royal Marines, the Army and the Royal Air Force, respectively, in the current and succeeding two financial years.
Fifteen officers of the Royal Navy are due to leave on compulsory redundancy during the current financial year.For future years it is not known how many of the redundancies declared will necessitate compulsory rather than voluntary retirement.
Special Forces
36.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will now answer questions relating to the activities of special forces in overseas countries.
No.
Service Personnel (Cyprus)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many service men in the last 12 months have been convicted in the sovereign base areas in Cyprus of driving impaired by alcohol; and in how many of these the attention of the British authorities has been drawn to discrepancies affecting the official analyst's reports.
Forty-six service personnel were convicted in the sovereign base area court of driving while impaired by alcohol in the period 1 July 1982 to 30 June 1983. One serviceman contested (unsuccessfully) the official analyst's assessment of his blood alcohol level; he did not appeal against conviction. There have been three other cases in which the defendant initially challenged the official analyst's report but subsequently pleaded guilty.
Type 22 Frigate
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he now expects to be able to place an order for two new type 22 frigates with Vosper-Thornycroft shipyard in Southampton.
I have nothing to add at present to the answer given to my hon. Friend the Member for Gosport (Mr. Viggers) on 12 May 1983. — [Vol. 42, c. 472.]
Royal Arsenal, Woolwich
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement about the results of the review of land usage at the Royal Arsenal, Woolwich; and whether an additional office building will now be built on the site.
In order to meet the need for a new headquarters for the quality assurance directorate at the Royal Arsenal (West) and to make the best practicable use of the listed buildings on the site, the Property Services Agency proposed a serious of options, the most attractive of which incorporated a number of listed buildings and promised a measure of public access to see them. Planning has been proceeding on the basis of this option, but progress is subject to the need to take account of a separate proposal to reationalise the procurement executive's quality assurance services, which might affect the requirement for new building at Woolwich. This proposal is currently the subject of consultation with the trade union side, and decisions are expected in the autumn.
Royal Ordnance Depot, Donnington
asked the Secretary of State for Defence when the royal ordnance depot at Donnington was last investigated for fire risk; what was the content of the report; and if he will make a statement.
The last full inspection of the RAOC central ordnance depot at Donnington was carried out by a senior fire prevention officer on 23 to 26 May 1983. While the report itself is classified, I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Harborough (Mr. Farr) on 4 July 1983.—[Vol. 45, c. 26.]
Nuclear Weapons (Convoys)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how often convoys carrying nuclear weapons travel on the A38 between Exeter and Plymouth; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he is satisfied with the level of safety provision with regard to convoys carrying nuclear weapons travelling on the A38 between Exeter and Plymouth, in view of the absence of a crash barrier on the central reservation; and if he will make a statement.
It has been a long standing practice of successive Governments not to comment on the routes and means used to transport nuclear weapons. However, I wish to repeat the assurances on safety and security given by my hon. Friend the Under-Secretary of State for Defence Procurement to the hon. Member for Cumbernauld and Kilsyth (Mr. Hogg) on 6 May,—[Vol. 42, c. 161.]
Nationalised Industries
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list in the Official Report all nationalised industries, whether statutory corporations, companies, or trading bodies of any sort, in which the Government now have any financial interest or for which they may make financial provision, in whole or part, for which he is the sponsoring Minister; and if he will list all subsidiaries or divisions of those industries which may carry on business under a different name from that of the parent nationalised industry.
My right hon. Friend does not sponsor any nationalised industries. He is, however, responsible for the following executive non-governmental public bodies:
- International Military Services Ltd
- The National Army Museum
- The RAF Museum
- The Services Sound and Vision Corporation
Wales
Enterprise Zones
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will list the firms that have established themselves, or are in the process of establishing themselves, in enterprise zones in Wales; and how many employees each firm has, or will have, in the zones.
The second report of the enterprise zone monitoring study published in April 1983 showed that the number of firms and jobs newly established in the Welsh enterprise zone at Swansea between 1 June 1981 and 31 December 1982 was 68 and 705 respectively. The information about employment in individual firms was gathered in confidence and the figures about jobs in each firm cannot be released.My hon. Friend the Under-Secretary of State for the Environment, the Member for Ealing, Acton (Sir G. Young) will be writing to my hon. Friend with a list of all firms newly established in all zones in England, Scotland and Wales up to 31 May 1982, the latest date at which this detailed information is available.
Departmental Expenditure
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will list in the Official Report all the payments made in the last financial year by the Welsh Office to organisations and institutions associated with or representative of local government in Wales.
Six payments to the Welsh joint education committee totalling £159,942 were made during 1982–83. Payments are also made to bodies with more tenuous connections with local authorities, but to list these would involve the Department in a disproportionate cost in staff time and resources.
National Health Service
asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many (a) maintenance and (b) administrative and clerical staff are employed by the National Health Service in Wales; and what are the comparable figures for 1974, 1976, 1980, 1981 and 1982.
The figures are:
Whole-time equivalents
| ||
Number of maintenance staff
| Number of administrative and clerical staff
| |
| September 1974 | 1,480 | 5,353 |
| September 1976 | 1,495 | 5,881 |
| September 1980 | 1,648 | 6,286 |
| September 1981 | 1,683 | 6,390 |
| September 1982 | 1,700 | 6,437 |
| June 1983 | 1,696 | 6,535 |
Agency Nurses
asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many agency nurses are being employed by the National Health Service in Wales.
None.
Artificial Limbs
asked the Secretary of State for Wales (1) in each of the last three years, how many prostheses manufactured overseas were supplied by the limb service in Wales;(2) if he will give brief descriptions of all prostheses supplied by overseas manufacturers in the last 12 months through the limb service in Wales;(3) what is the Government's policy with regard to the supply by the Welsh artificial limb service of prostheses manufactured overseas where no limb of a comparable design or containing comparable materials is available from British manufacturers.
Prostheses and components manufactured overseas may be prescribed where it is decided that they would best meet a patient's special requirements. Information on the kinds and numbers supplied is not readily available.
Nationalised Industries
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will list in the Official Report all nationalised industries, whether statutory corporations, companies, or trading bodies of any sort, in which the Government now have any financial interest or for which they may make financial provision, in whole or part, for which he is the sponsoring Minister; and if he will list all subsidiaries or divisions of those industries which may carry on business under a different name from that of the parent nationalised industry.
The only body for which I am the sponsoring Minister which may fit my hon. Friend's description is the Welsh water authority.
Transport
Warkworth Harbour Revision Order
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether a public inquiry is to be held into the draft Warkworth harbour revision order and the objections made to it.
Yes, unless the objections are withdrawn.
Windscreens
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will estimate how many accidents, in the most convenient three-year period, were caused by defective windscreens.
Defective windscreens are not recorded in reports of accidents submitted to the Department of Transport. It is possible that some police forces may have such information for their own areas, but this is not submitted to the Department.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether there is any evidence to suggest that inclusion of a visual check of windscreen condition in the annual vehicle test would contribute to road safety.
I have no reason to believe that defects in windscreens are a significant safety problem. The condition of the windscreen is examined as part of the test for heavy goods vehicles and public service vehicles. It is not a specific item in the test for motor cars, although testers are required to state on the test report any non testable defects which in their opinion renders the vehicle dangerous for use on the road.
Travel-To-Work Costs
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will estimate the current average weekly travel-to-work cost.
The average weekly travel-to-work cost in Great Britain as at May 1983 is estimated as £4·60.
Roads
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how much was spent on road maintenance and building in the United Kingdom in the last year for which figures are available.
A total of £1,801 million was spent on English roads in 1981–82, including £823 million on new construction and improvement. The figures cover motorways, trunk roads and local authority roads. Final figures for 1982–83 are not yet available. I am not responsible for road expenditure in other parts of the United Kingdom.
Level Crossings (Safety)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he will publish the report of the committee of inquiry into pedestrian safety at level crossings appointed in November 1982 under the chairmanship of the right hon. Member for Gloucester (Mrs. Oppenheim).
I am pleased to say that the report is published today and I have placed copies in the Library. I am very grateful to the committee for its work and I am sure the whole House will welcome its careful analysis of this important subject and, in particular, its findings that automatic crossings have a good pedestrian safety record. The committee's proposals for providing further pedestrian safeguards demand careful study. We will be consulting the British Railways Board, highway authorities and other interests concerned, and will then make a further statement.
Nuclear Waste
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether and how often, nuclear waste passes through Totnes in British Rail wagons; and if he will make a statement.
My Department does not have detailed operational information about rail movements as these are a matter for the railways board.
Electronic Road Pricing
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement about the involvement of his Department in the development of the Transpotech electronic road pricing system.
The Hong Kong authorities, knowing of previous work on road pricing techniques carried out by my Department, approached officials early in 1982 for advice on implementing an electronic read pricing system. After further discussions they asked my Department to arrange for Transpotech to prepare a detailed proposal for a pilot project, and this was submitted earlier this year.I am pleased to report that Transpotech has now entered into a £3·5 million agreement for the work. Staff from this Department have been seconded to Transpotech and four British companies are supplying equipment and expertise.
British Airways
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what is Her Majesty's Government's policy on extending British Airways borrowing powers.
Under the Civil Aviation (Amendment) Act 1982 British Airways' statutory borrowing limit was set at £1,200 million, with further increases permissible by order. Within the present borrowing limit, external financing limits are set for British Airways on a year-to-year basis on the same basis as with other nationalised industries.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether Her Majesty's Government are considering providing additional funds to British Airways to purchase or lease eighteen aircraft to replace the Trident fleet; and if, in view of the current review of marginal routes, he will satisfy himself, before providing any additional funds, that no aircraft will be surplus to requirements.
British Airways is discussing with the Government the possibility of the acquisition of aircraft to replace its Trident fleet. I can assure my hon. Friend that the Government have no intention of providing funds for the acquisition of more aircraft than the airline can expect to operate profitably.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what are Her Majesty's Government's proposals for denationalisation of British Airways; and which will be achieved in (a) 1983–84 and (b) later years; and if he will make a statement.
I shall answer this question shortly.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he proposed to write off any of British Airways losses in 1981–82 and 1982–83 on marginal routes or other losses; and whether he proposes to write off any losses for the current financial year.
I shall answer this question shortly.
Nationalised Industries
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list in the Official Report, all nationalised industries, whether statutory corporations, companies, or trading bodies of any sort, in which the Government now have any financial interest or for which they may make financial provision, in whole or part, for which he is the sponsoring Minister; and if he will list all subsidiaries or divisions of those industries which may carry on business under a different name from that of the parent nationalised industry.
The nationalised industries for which I am the sponsoring Minister are:
- British Airports Authority
- British Airways Board
- British Railways Board
- National Bus Company
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Paramyxovirus
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he expects to conclude his review of a possible vaccination programme against the spread of paramyxovirus in pigeons.
Decisions about permitting the use of vaccine in racing pigeons will be taken in the light of developments, and will depend upon the veterinary assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of such a course of action.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, further to the reply on 30 June, Official Report, c. 684–5, if he will publish in the Official Report such information he has as to the kind of tests carried out on racing pigeons in Belgium, Holland, France and Germany which established the existence of a paramyxovirus associated with Newcastle disease.
Our information is that tests were used in all the countries mentioned to establish the existence of paramyxovirus in racing pigeons. The virus isolates are classified in the paramyxovirus 1 group by the haemagglutination inhibition test and serum neutralisation test.Experimental infection of pigeons with the viruses isolated from affected pigeons have reproduced the disease in Holland.
Pigmeat Imports
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many tons of pigmeat have been imported from Denmark during the last 12 months; what were the corresponding figures for the last five years; and if he will make a statement.
The following is the information requested:
| United Kingdom Imports of Pigmeat from Denmark | |
| May-April | '000 Tonnes* |
| 1977–78 | 287 |
| 1978–79 | 290 |
| 1979–80 | 295 |
| 1980–81 | 275 |
| 1981–82 | 269 |
| 1982–83 | 248 |
| * Carcase weight equivalent | |
Newcastle Disease
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will consider encouraging a vaccination programme to be undertaken in the event of further outbreaks of Newcastle disease.
No outbreaks of Newcastle disease have been confirmed in this country since 1978. As regards the use of vaccine in relation to paramyxovirus in racing pigeons, I refer the hon. Member to my reply today to the hon. Member for Workington (Mr. Campbell-Savours).
Nationalised Industries
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list in the Official Report all nationalised industries, whether statutory corporations, companies, or trading bodies of any sort, in which the Government now have any financial interest or for which they may make financial provision, in whole or part, for which he is the sponsoring Minister; and if he will list all subsidiaries or divisions of those industries which may carry on business under a different name from that of the parent nationalised industry.
I have no sponsoring responsibility for any nationalised industries as set out in part 3 of the public expenditure White Paper.
Flood Prevention
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he is satisfied that sufficient funds are available to water authorities to enable them to carry out flood prevention work; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to her reply, 4 July 1983, c. 45]: Water authorities are subject to the same restraints on expenditure as other public authorities. Funds for water authorities' capital schemes are provided partly from local sources and partly from the Exchequer. Exchequer funds have continued to be available for essential flood prevention work. Funds from local ratepayers have to be balanced with the demands made by other local services.
Prime Minister
Engagements
Q5.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q6.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q7.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q8.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q10.
asked the Prime Minister whether she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q11.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q13.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q14.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q15.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q16.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q17.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q18.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q19.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q20.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q21.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q22.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q23.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q24.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q25.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q26.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q27.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q28.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q31.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q32.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q33.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q35.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q36.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q37.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q38.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q39.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q40.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q42.
asked the Prime Minister whether she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q43.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q44.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q45.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q46.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 12 July.
Q47.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q48.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
Q51.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 12 July.
This morning I had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others, including one with President Burnham of Guyana. In addition to my duties in the House I shall be having further meetings later today. This evening I hope to have an audience of Her Majesty the Queen.
Cruise Missiles
Q9.
asked the Prime Minister what operational control the Government will have over the operation of cruise missiles based in Great Britain.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply that I gave on 12 May to my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Colchester (Mr. Buck). — [Vol. 42, c. 435.]
Privatisation
Q12.
asked the Prime Minister if she will make a statement on progress in the introduction of private capital into the public sector.
We have made clear our willingness to consider the introduction of private capital into the public sector, where this can produce improvements in efficiency at least sufficient to offset any extra costs and provided the finance is raised in fair competition with the private sector. It has not proved easy to identify schemes which meet these criteria, but various proposals are still under discussion. More generally, the privatisation programme outlined in our manifesto remains a key element in our economic strategy, and will be pursued with renewed vigour in this Parliament.
Engagements
Q29.
asked the Prime Minister how many parliamentary questions asking her to list her official engagements for the day she has answered in the current Parliament to date.
The number was 198 up to and including Tuesday 12 July.
Confederation Of British Industry
Q30.
asked the Prime Minister when she next intends to meet the director-general of the Confederation of British Industry.
I have at present no plans to do so.
Middle East
Q34.
asked the Prime Minister whether she envisages any fresh British initiative in conjunction with other European Community countries to bring about a peaceful settlement of outstanding questions in the middle east, including a withdrawal of all foreign armed forces from Lebanon in accordance with the recent agreement between Israel, Lebanon and the United States of America.
No, but we and our partners in the Ten have welcomed the Israel-Lebanon agreement as a positive step forward. And we remain committed to working for the withdrawal of all foreign forces from Lebanon and for a just and lasting peace in the middle east.
Wales
Q41.
asked the Prime Minister if she will take steps to ensure that Government policy in Wales is in line with the wishes of the people of Wales.
The presence of the Secretary of State for Wales in the Cabinet and his accountability to Parliament ensure that the needs and aspirations of people in Wales are taken into account when decisions on Government policy are taken.
Minister Of Fisheries
Q49.
asked the Prime Minister, in view of the present position and the importance of the industry to the United Kingdom, she will give consideration to the appointment of a Minister of fisheries for the United Kingdom.
No. I am confident that the existing allocation of responsibilities between my right hon. Friends will enable the Government to safeguard the interests of the fishing industry as successfully in the future as it has up to now.
Hastings
Q50.
asked the Prime Minister if she will make an official visit to Hastings.
I have at present no plans to do so.
Labour Statistics
asked the Prime Minister if she will estimate the cost of benefits paid out and income lost as a result of the number of unemployed in the London borough of Southwark.
The information requested about the cost of benefits could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. No meaningful estimate of income lost could be made.
Sport And Recreation
asked the Prime Minister if she will abolish the office of Minister with responsibility for sport.
No. My hon. Friend, the Member for Sutton and Cheam (Mr. Macfarlane) will continue to have special responsibility for sport and recreation as a Under-Secretary of State for the Environment.
South Africa
asked the Prime Minister whether it remains the policy of Her Majesty's Government to adhere to the United Nations mandatory arms embargo on South Africa.
Yes.
Top Salaries Review Body
asked the Prime Minister what was the cost of the work of the Top Salaries Review Body in relation to the report of the review of parliamentary pay and allowances; and what was the cost of publishing the report as Cmnd. 8881.
The additional costs arising were £116,000 in respect of consultancy and other expenses, and £53,600 in respect of publication. The secretariat for the review was provided by the Office of Manpower Economics from within its established resources. Members of the review body are unpaid.
Environment
Rate Increases (Legislation)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if, in preparing his legislation to penalise excessive rate increases by local authorities, he will consider the effect on the authorities' costs of agreements between unions and authorities which unreasonably benefit the authorities' employees.
We shll be publishing our proposals for rate limitation shortly. I would ask my hon. Friend to await the White Paper to see how far the proposals will meet his particular concerns.
Enterprise Zones
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the firms which have established themselves, or are in the process of establishing themselves, in enterprise zones in England; and how many employees each firm has, or will have, in the zones.
The second report of the Enterprise Zones monitoring study, published in April 1983, shows that the number of firms and jobs newly established in the English enterprise zones between 1 June 1981 and 31 December 1982 was as follows:
| Zone | Firms | Jobs |
| Salford/Trafford | 44 | 531 |
| Wakefield | 10 | 130 |
| Dudley | 36 | 243 |
| Hartlepool | 34 | 313 |
| Corby | 38 | 495 |
| Tyneside | 53 | 264 |
| Liverpool | 21 | 339 |
| Isle of Dogs | 54 | 254 |
| Totals | 290 | 2,569 |
Dangerous Wild Animals Act
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he is satisfied with the scope of the Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976; and if he is considering making any amendments to the list of animals specified in the schedule thereto.
A review of the schedule is currently being undertaken in consultation with interested organisations.
Local Government (International Organisations)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list in the Official Report the names of all international organisations known to his Department which represent local government or local government activities in Europe.
My Department is aware of the following organisations:
- The International Union of Local Authorities.
- The Council of European Municipalities.
- The Standing Conference of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe.
- The Standing Technological Conference of European Local Authorities.
- The Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of the European Community.
- The Union of Capital Cities of the European Community.
- The Union of Capital Regions of the European Community.
- The United Towns Organisation.
Welwyn Hatfield (Enterprise Zone)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will consider designating Welwyn Hatfield an enterprise zone.
Welwyn Hatfield district council did not submit an application for an enterprise zone on the last occasion that the Government announced its intention to designate further zones. We have no plans at present to invite further applications.
Housing Association Tenants (House Purchase)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what representation he has received regarding extending the right-to-buy opportunity to tenants of housing associations.
Since the autumn last year, over 100 letters have been received in favour of an extension of the right to buy to the tenants of charitable housing associations, and about 200 against such an extension. In addition, some 30 letters have been received requesting an extension of the right to buy to housing association tenants where the landlord does not own the freehold.
Council House Sales
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will take steps to increase the speed of completion of sales under the right-to-buy legislation in Welwyn Hatfield.
My right hon. Friend is continuing to monitor carefully whether tenants of Welwyn Hatfield are having difficulty in exercising their right to buy. I am not aware of any problem in the completion of right-to-buy sales at present, but if my hon. Friend knows of a particular case where delay has occurred, I should be grateful if he will write to me.
Nationalised Industries
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list in the Official Report all nationalised industries, whether statutory corporations, companies, or trading bodies of any sort, in which the Government now have any financial interest or for which they may make financial provision, in whole or part, for which he is the sponsoring Minister; and if he will list all subsidiaries or divisions of those industries which may carry on business under a different name from that of the parent nationalised industry.
I am responsible for the British Waterways Board and for the regional water authorities. The British Waterways Board's subsidiary companies are detailed in Appendix V Statement D of the board's annual report and accounts for 1982, (page 53). The nine regional water authorities have no subsidiary companies or divisions carrying on business under a different name from that of the authority concerned.
Northern Ireland
New University Of Ulster
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what is the effect on the policy of merging the new university of Ulster with the polytechnic of the lack of the necessary majority for the merger in the court of the university,
I have made it clear that even if the court's decision on 27 June is final and pre vents the New University of Ulster from surrendering its charter and petitioning jointly with the polytechnic for a charter for the new university institution, this will not impede the formation of the new institution, for which planning will continue. Following the court meeting, the senate and council of the new university of Ulster have re-affirmed their support for the merger and for their continued involvement in the planning; a further court meeting is to be held on 21 July.
Nationalised Industries
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will list in the Official Report all nationalised industries, whether statutory corporations, companies, or trading bodies of any sort, in which the Government now have any financial interest or for which they may make financial provision, in whole or part, for which he is the sponsoring Minister; and if he will list all subsidiaries or divisions of those industries which may carry on business under a different name from that of the parent nationalised industry.
I shall reply to my hon. Friend as soon as possible.
The Hon Member For Lagan Valley (Speech)
asked the Secreary of State for Northern Ireland whether the police have yet completed their consideration of the speech, delivered by the hon. Member for Lagan Valley, formerly the hon. Member for South Antrim, on 13 July 1982, which he referred to them in 1982 with a view to their taking any action which they might consider necessary; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 11 July 1983, c. 278]: I understand that no evidence was offered to the police, whose inquiries have been completed and a report made to the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland, to connect any person with the murder of the Rev. Robert Bradford. The Director directed that there was no evidence to warrant the initiation of criminal proceedings against any persons.
Organisations (Legal Status)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will list in the Official Report those organisations in the Province whose legal status he keeps under review.
[pursuant to his reply, 11 July 1983,c. 276]: I continue to keep under review organisations whose activities could bring them within the ambit of section 21 of the Northern Ireland (Emergency Provisions) Act 1978, but it would not be appropriate for me to make known which they are.
Security (Cross-Border Co-Operation)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what further progress has been made between Her Majesty's Government and the Government of the Republic of Ireland on cross-border security co-operation; what benefits have resulted from this co-operation in terms of arrests, convictions, extraditions, and so on; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 11 July 1983, c. 276]: Co-operation between the RUC and the Garda Siochana plays a continuing and valuable part in combating terrorist and other crimes in both jurisdictions. An important element is directed at the prevention of crime, and the results are not therefore susceptible to statistical treatment in the terms requested.
Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs
Arab States (Local Regulations And Religious Restrictions)
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will publish the advice given by his Department to British businessmen and tourists visiting each of the Arab States concerning local regulations and religious restrictions.
The Department of Trade publishes advice in its booklets, "Hints to Businessmen". The Consular Department of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and British Consulates in Arab countries give advice in response to specific inquiries from tourists and other visitors from Britain.
Lebanon
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what information he has as to which of the Arab countries have (a) supported the Israel-Lebanon agreement, (b) supported the Lebanese demand for the withdrawal of all foreign troops from its territory, (c) suported Syria's refusal to accede to that request and (d) backed the Palestine Liberation Organisation in its claim to retain a military presence in Lebanon; and whether he will indicate the results of his contacts with each to encourage them to secure the withdrawal of all foreign forces from Lebanon, as outlined in his speech on 28 June, Official Report, c. 485.
It is for the Governments concerned to state their own views on these questions. For our part we have welcomed the agreement between Israel and Lebanon and hope that it will be followed by the complete withdrawal of foreign forces from Lebanon. To that end, we with our European partners remain in close touch with all the countries directly concerned.
Local Government (International Organisations)
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list in the Official Report the names of each international organisation representing local government or local government activities in Europe to which financial contributions are made by (a) his Department and (b) the European Community, together with the amount of the payment made.
The international organisation representing local government and local government activities in Europe to which the Foreign and Commonwealth Office makes contribution is the Council of Europe. The Council of Europe funds the Conference of Local and Regional Authorities of Europe from its ordinary budget. Appropriations under this head in 1982 were French Francs 2,704,000 (£248,639) and French Francs 3,044,500 (£272,935) for 1983. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office contribution to the Council of Europe ordinary budget for the period January to December 1982 was French France 41,484,313 (£4,102,068) and for the same period in 1983 was French Francs 44,822,905 (£4,018,310).We are not aware of any contributions by the European Community to any international organisation representing local government or local government activities in Europe.
Korea
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if Her Majesty's Government will support North Korea's request for negotiations with the United States Government for a permanent peace treaty on the peninsula.
The termination of the present situation in Korea is primarily a matter for the Koreans themselves. We welcomed the proposals for direct contacts between north and south Korea to discuss peaceful reunification made by President Chun Doo Hwan in 1981 and 1982. It will be recalled that United States forces participated in the hostilities there as part of a United Nations command.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the policy of Her Majesty's Government towards the peaceful re-unification of Korea; and if he will make a statement.
We have consistently supported efforts to achieve the peaceful reunification of Korea. The establishment of the necessary confidence and understanding requires direct contact between north and south Korea.
China (Visit)
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he has any plans to pay an official visit to the People's Republic of China.
My right hon. and learned Friend has no present plans to do so.
Bbc External Services
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether he has any proposals for further reductions in the BBC's external services.
As announced by the Chancellor on 7 July, public expenditure is running at a significantly higher level than is consistent with the 1983–84 planning total announced in the Public Expenditure White Paper (Cmnd. 8789), and, in order to bring the total spending closer to the planned path, cash limits for the current year will be reduced. The implications of the Chancellor's announcement for the BBC's external services finances are under consideration.
British Council
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether he has any proposals for reductions in the services provided by the British Council.
As announced by the Chancellor on 7 July, public expenditure is running at a significantly higher level than is consistent with the 1983–84 planning total announced in the Public Expenditure White Paper (Cmnd. 8789), and, in order to bring the total spending closer to the planned path, cash limits for the current year will be reduced. The implications of the Chancellor's announcement for British Council finances are under consideration.
Energy
Fuel Standing Charges
asked the Secretary of State for Energy which area electricity boards are not ensuring that standard charges should be limited to a maximum of half of a domestic consumer's bill.
In response to a proposal by my right hon. Friend the previous Secretary of State, most area electricity boards are limiting standing charges to one half of the total domestic bill. However, the south-eastern board is limiting the standing charge to one half only at zero consumption, with a sliding reduction hereafter; and the north-eastern board is not applying the rebate scheme to prepayment customers. Representations have been received about this, and I regret that these boards have not adopted my right hon. Friend's proposal in full.
Severn Estuary
asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will ensure that the port authorities of the Severn estuary are fully involved in the work of the Severn Tidal Power Group or any similar future study, and that all relevant information arising from its study is provided from time to time to the estuarial port authorities.
The 50 per cent. Government funded two-year study being carried out by the Severn tidal power group (STPG) is to assess the technical and financial viability of a barrage built and operated by the private sector. During the course of the study, the STPG will be consulting interested parties. I have therefore drawn the group's attention to the particular interest of the local port authorities and requested their inclusion in the consultation process.
Pneumoconiosis
asked the Secretary of State for Energy how many men suffering from pneumoconiosis are known to be excluded from the National Coal Board industrial death and retirement scheme by reason of having suffered from the disease prior to 30 March 1970; and if he will make a statement.
This is a matter for the National Coal Board. I have asked the chairman of the board to write to the hon. Member.
Mining Industry
asked the Secretary of State for Energy how many jobs were lost in the mining industry from (a) 1960 to 1971 and (b) 1971 to 1982.
Between the beginning of 1960 and the end of March 1971, the number of men on NCB colliery books fell by 353,781. Between then and the end of 1982, the number fell by 80,686.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy how many persons were recruited into the mining industry in 1981, 1982 and to the nearest available date in 1983.
Recruitment on to NCB colliery books totalled 6,123 in 1981, 6,709 in 1982, and 1,402 in the first half of 1983.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what was the total manpower in the mining industry at the end of March in 1982 and 1983.
At the end of March 1982 there were 212,843 men on NCB colliery books; at the end of March 1983 there were 202,669.
Coal (Subsidies)
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what was the level of subsidy per ton to the coal industry in the following countries in 1982 (a) Belgium, (b) France, (c) West Germany and (d) the United Kingdom.
I refer to the answer that I gave to the hon. Member for Houghton and Washington (Mr. Boyes) on 6 July.—[Vol. 45, c. 103–4.]
Social Services
Unemployment Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list for each of the last 10 years the percentage increase in flat rate unemployment benefit received by a couple and by a couple with two children and the percentage increases in net and gross average earnings.
I refer my hon. Friend to the abstract of statistics for index of retail prices, average earnings, social security benefits and contributions, June 1983, which is in the Library of the House. Table 6.1b provides the figures from which percentage increases may be derived. Both the earnings—gross and net—and the benefit figures in that table, for the couples with children, include family allowance-child benefit; I think that gives a better basis for comparison. My hon. Friend will know that the corresponding benefit rates after the uprating in November will be £43·75 for a married couple and £57·05 for a couple with two children.
Cystic Fibrosis
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what consideration he has given to exempting adult sufferers from cystic fibrosis from prescription charges.
Since taking office in 1979, we have considered several requests to include cystic fibrosis in the list of medical conditions which confer exemption from charges. While we have considerable sympathy for people suffering from this condition, we have to recognise that an argument could be advanced for the inclusion of a large number of conditions. In fairness we cannot take any one in isolation and to include them all would cost the National Health Service a great deal of money. I cannot therefore agree to extend the list.Exemption from charges is not restricted to sufferers from listed medical conditions. Such groups as the elderly and those on low income are also exempt. Overall some 70 per cent. of prescription items are dispensed without charge.
Pneumoconiosis
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many cases of pneumoconiosis were diagnosed by his Department's medical panels in 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982.
The following table shows the number of cases of pneumoconiosis, which includes silicosis and asbestosis, diagnosed by pneumoconiosis medical boards in connection with claims for disablement benefit under the industrial injuries scheme from 1979 to 1982 inclusive:
| Number of cases | |
| 1979 | 795 |
| 1980 | 728 |
| 1981 | 734 |
| 1982 | 733 |
Invalidity Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people in receipt of invalidity benefit are entitled to free prescriptions.
Precise figures are not available. However it is estimated that of the 633,000 people in receipt of invalidity benefit in May 1981, some 8 per cent. were automatically exempt from prescription charges on age grounds and a further 7 per cent were automatically exempt because they were in receipt of supplementary benefit. An unknown proportion of the remainder would have been exempt because they suffered from one of the specified medical conditions, were in receipt of family income supplement or because their income was below the level at which low income exemption was then available.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he will consider making prescriptions free for all people in receipt of invalidity benefit.
While we have considerable sympathy for people whose condition makes them eligible for invalidity benefit, we have to recognise that an argument could be advanced for the extension of exemption from prescription charges to many separate groups of people. In fairness we cannot take any one group in isolation, and to include them all would cost the National Health Service a great deal of money. I cannot therefore agree to extend exemption in the way suggested.
Nhs (Hospital Facilities)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many beds, wards and operating theatres there are within the National Health Service in England; and how many are not being used.
Information on the total complement of beds, and the numbers of wards and operating theatres is not held centrally. The average daily number of available staffed beds in NHS hospitals in England during 1981, the latest year for which information is available, was 351,505.
Housing Benefit Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what representations he has received from metropolitan authorities concerning the full start of the housing benefit scheme; and if he is satisfied with its operation.
The Association of Metropolitan Authorities and the other local authority associations, have asked for an extension of the transitional arrangements to allow some authorities more time to complete the take-on of existing cases onto housing benefit. This has been granted. An up-to-date report on the implementation of the scheme is currently being compiled. I hope to make a statement on it shortly.
Drug Advertisements
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will seek discussions on the ethics of drug advertisements with drug manufacturers to ensure their factual accuracy.
It is an offence under the Medicines Act 1968 to issue a false or misleading advertisement. We work closely with the administrators of the various voluntary codes of practice in the pharmaceutical industry to maintain high ethical standards. Each of these codes contains a requirement that claims in advertisements for medicinal products should be capable of proper substantiation.I am satisfied that the vast majority of the many thousands of advertisements issued each year comply with the high standards of factual accuracy we require. Nevertheless I propose to issue a reminder to all product licence holders of the need for scrupulous and unambiguous consistency with the permitted indications for their products in all advertisements to doctors and dentists.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will seek legislation to impose a requirement on drug companies that the same prominence shall be given in advertisements of drugs to side effects as to the claimed benefits.
Medicines which are permitted to be advertised to the public are considered to be sufficiently safe for self treatment that warnings of side effects in advertisements for them are not necessary.Advertisements for prescription-only medicines are only aimed at professionally qualified medical and dental practitioners. They are required to contain a succinct statement of any relevant entries in the data sheet relating to side-effects, precautions and contra-indications. These advertisements may only be issued if a data sheet has been sent to the practitioner so that he has a document containing the essential information about side-effects and contra-indications. I remain satisfied that existing regulations are sufficient to ensure that essential information is available to professional practitioners on the medicines they are likely to prescribe. I propose to ensure that these regulations are followed and enforced.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will take steps to check the accuracy of advertisements for medical drugs in medical magazines.
A random scrutiny of various journal advertisements is carried out by the administrative section of the Department's medicines division. In addition professional staff within the division recognise the need for vigilance and report any doubtful practices which they observe.I am arranging for a greater concentration of existing resources to be devoted to the examination of advertisements for prescription only medicines.
Attendance Allowance
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will amend the Social Security (Attendance Allowance) (No. 2) Regulations 1975 in order to allow the allowance to be retained by children during the first four weeks in residential care as applies to adults and to children in hospital; and if he will make a statement.
Yes. I refer the hon. Member to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Exeter (Mr. Hannam) on 30 June 1983.—[Vol. 44, c. 144.]
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services why attendance allowance is paid four weekly in arrears when a child receives regular rota-care in a local authority hostel when regulation 18 of the Social Security (Claims and Payments) Regulations 1979 provides for payment in arrears at weekly intervals; whether he has any evidence that families are withdrawing their children from rota-care because of delays in paying the allowance; and if he will make a statement.
Regulation 18 permits payment in arrears at intervals other than weekly in any case where my right hon. Friend so directs. To avoid additional administrative costs for the Department and unduly frequent notifications by claimants, payments in the cases de scribed are made four-weekly in arrears. I have no evidence that parents are withdrawing their children from short-term care because of these payment arrangements. However, the proposed change in the regulations which I announced on 30 June in reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Exeter (Mr. Hannam)— [Vol. 44, c. 144.]—will largely eliminate the difficulty from August and enable us to leave the order book with the parent in most cases.
Trust Sums
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish in the Official Report the rules relating to the treatment of sums held under trust for the purposes of (a) supplementary benefit and (b) residential care charges; whether different rules apply to payments under the Vaccine Damage Payments Act which are held on trust; and if he will make a statement.
The following provisions relating to the treatment for supplementary benefit purposes of sums held under a trust are contained in regulation 4 of the Supplementary Benefit (Resources) Regulations:—
'(6) A member of the assessment unit shall be treated as possessing the whole or any appropriate share calculated in accordance with paragraph (8) of any resources held under a trust, whether created by virtue of a statutory provision or otherwise, under which the trustees have any express or implied discretion to pay him, or apply for his benefit, any income or capital.
(7) A member of the assessment unit shall not be treated as possessing a resource pursuant to paragraph (6) if the trust funds are derived from a payment. whether in pursuance of a court order or otherwise, in consequence of a personal or criminal injury to him, except that if he is the claimant or the partner of the claimant this paragraph shall apply only for the period, not normally exceeding 12 months from the date on which the payment would, but for this paragraph, fall to be taken into account for the purposes of a claim for pension or allowance or a review of a determination pursuant to regulation 4 of the Determination of Questions Regulations, for which, having regard to the intentions of the trustees, it is reasonable that he shall not be treated as so possessing a resource.
Regulation 4(7) was intended to apply where payments under the Vaccine Damage Payments Act and similar payments are held on trust. The intention was that such payments should be wholly disregarded where the parent of the injured person is claiming supplementary benefit and disregarded temporarily where the injured person is himself the claimant and there is an intention to use the payment for some major expense such as the purchase of a car or the adaptation of a house for the injured person's benefit. However, a recent decison of a tribunal of social security commissioners has ruled that where a person is absolutely entitled as sole beneficiary to trust funds—as is the case where a vaccine damage payment is held on trust — regulations 4(6), (7) and (8) do not apply. Instead, the market value of the beneficiary's equitable interest in the trust funds falls to be taken into account as an actual capital resource.My right hon. Friend laid before Parliament on 8 July the draft Supplementary Benefit (Requirements, Resources and Single Payments) Amendment Regulations 1983 which contain a provision designed to secure that the treatment intended under regulation 4(7) of the resources regulations is continued.In assessing a resident's ability to pay charges for local authority residential accommodation provided under part III of the National Assistance Act 1948, the provision relating to trusts in the former schedule 1 to the Supplementary Benefit Act 1976 still applies:(8) A member of the assessment unit to whom paragraph 16) applies shall be treated as possessing a resource either in whole or in part having regard to—(a) the number of beneficiaries under the trust; and (b) the terms of the trust, either express or implied, but no resource shall be treated as possessed by virtue of these paragraphs for such period, not exceeding three months from the date on which it would otherwise have been so treated, as is necessary to enable the trustees to make arrangements for payments to be made to that person'.
"Any sum which is held on a discretionary trust for the benefit of a person may be treated as included in his resources".
Local authorities therefore have discretion in deciding how to treat such trusts when assessing charges. The Department's memorandum of guidance on charging and assessment procedures, which gives guidance on the interpretation and application of the schedule suggests that where a trust deed allows for the release of capital, it would be reasonable to treat its value as part of the person's capital resources to be taken into account in assessing charges for the accommodation. The value of the trust could then be depleted to the level of the amount of capital which is disregarded under the schedule (£1,200) over a period of years. However the guidance is given in non-directive terms; it is for the authorities themselves to decide whether or not to take the value of a trust into account and to consider individual cases in the light of the person's particular needs and circumstances.
Married Women (Disablement Allowance)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will consider making available to widows and single women the equivalent of the married women's disablement allowance.
If the hon. Member has in mind noncontributory invalidity pension this is already available to widows and single women on a test of their incapacity for work. Married women have to satisfy an additional test of their inability to perform normal household duties.
New Hospital, Telford
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the final estimated cost of building and commissioning the new hospital at Telford.
The present estimated capital cost of this scheme prior to tender is £25·5 million. This figure includes the costs of commissioning the hospital apart from RHA and DHA staff costs which are not readily identifiable.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what is the estimated annual running cost of the new hospital at Telford; and when he expects this money to be made available;(2) what savings will be made by the closure of existing hospitals that the new Telford hospital is intended to replace;(3) how many redundancies, and in which categories, will be necessary when the new hospital at Telford is opened and the local hospitals closed;(4) what are the proposed gains and losses in terms of hospital beds and outpatient clinics, specialty by specialty, that will occur with the opening of the new hospital at Telford.
Phase 1 of the proposed new district general hospital at Telford will provide a full outpatient department and 358 beds as follows:
| Specialty | Number of beds |
| General medicine | 82 |
| Paediatric medicine | 33 |
| General surgery | 131 |
| Orthopaedics | 52 |
| Other acute specialities | 12 |
| Geriatrics | 48 |
| Total | 358 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many additional medical and nursing staff will be needed to run the new hospital at Telford.
Phase I of the proposed new district general hospital at Telford will employ about 1,500 people. The hon. Member should contact the Shropshire health authority about any details which interest her.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what consideration is being given in the development of the new hospital at Telford to arrangements for transporting patients from areas now served by the hospitals proposed to be closed.
The West Midlands regional health authority and Shropshire health authority are still considering what closures may be necessary to fund the new hospital at Telford. Any proposed closures would be subject to full consultations locally and the consultation documents would have to set out any arrangements proposed for transporting patients to other hospitals.
War Planning (Funds)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how much money has been allocated, region by region, for war planning; and what restrictions have been given by him for its use.
Each region has been allocated £41,000 at 1983–84 cash levels to appoint staff to undertake home defence planning and co-ordination within the National Health Service. No special restrictions have been placed on the use of this sum.
Thiamin
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will assess the effect of withdrawing the present guaranteed quantities of thiamin from flour will have on the health of the elderly and on (a) men and (b) women suffering diet related diseases.
The Department's medical advisers do not anticipate that, in the context of a varied diet, there would be any measurable effect upon the health of the elderly or any other group if thiamin were not restored to white flour to the amount found naturally in brown flour.
Public Expenditure (Cuts)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services following the Chancellor of the Exchequer's statement on spending levels, what he expects to be the reduction in (a) the hospital and community services revenue budget, (b) the hospital and community services capital budget and (c) in other areas; and what real growth he expects in the current financial year in the hospital and community services revenue budget.
Details have not yet been settled. I will write to the hon. Lady as soon as possible.
Nhs (Property Sales)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he has any plans to encourage the sale of National Health Service property in the light of the Chancellor of the Exchequer's statement on spending levels on 7 July, Official Report, c. 418.
We remain commited to encouraging health authorities to review their land and property holdings and to dispose of these where they are surplus to the requirements of the National Health Service. This commitment pre-dates my right hon. Friend's statement of 7 July and is a policy aimed at maximising resources for the Service.
Pensions
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether it remains the Government's intention to pay small retirement and widows pensions of less than £1 a week annually in arrears; and, if so, what steps are being taken to implement that proposal.
Yes. Disproportionate cost is involved in paying very small pensions of £1 a week or less, as now, by weekly order book, four-weekly payable order or quarterly girocheque or payable order. These arrangements will continue unchanged until December 1983, but from next year payment will be made annually by payable order, except where this would cause undue hardship, when more frequent payment will still be possible. The first annual payment will be made towards the end of 1984 and will be combined with the Christmas bonus payment. Some 150,000 existing pensioners, mainly married women whose husbands have not yet retired, will be affected by the change and a letter explaining the new arrangements will be sent to each of them during July and August 1983.
Industrial Injuries
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what action he proposes to take on the Industrial Injuries Advisory Council's report on neoplasm of the bladder; and whether he will make a statement.
This report, published today, recommends changes to the terms of prescription for neoplasm of the bladder to make clearer which conditions and substances are involved. The aim is to make more people aware that they may be able to claim benefit. The council has also recommended that methylene-bis-orthochloro-aniline should be added to the list of substances prescribed. The new terms of prescription will be incorporated in the revised schedule of occupational diseases to be introduced later this year.
Artificial Limbs
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the estimated average time between receipt of an consultant's referral of a patient for prescription of an artificial limb by an artificial limb and applicance centre or sub-centre and limb fitting centre or sub-centre and (a) the patient's first visit to the centre or subcentre, (b) the despatch to the manufacturer of the order for the artificial limb, (c) the receipt of the artificial limb by the centre or sub-centre and (d) the final fitting of the artificial limb.
Information on which to base estimates is not readily available, but the Department tries to arrange for new patients to attend at a centre within 10 days of receiving a consultant's referral. If the stump is sufficiently healed and the prescription of a limb is indicated, the order is usually handed to he manufacturer and the patient is seen by a prosthetist on his first visit to the centre. In 1982 an average of 49 days was taken to manufacture an artificial limb, excluding days when it was outside the contractor's control.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what is the estimated average number of visits made by amputees to artificial limb and appliance centres or sub-centres and limb fitting centres or sub-centres before an artificial limb is finally fitted;(2) in each of the last three years for which figures are available
(a) how many attendances for the prescription and fitting of artificial limbs there were at artificial limb and appliance centres or sub-centres and limb fitting centres or sub-centres; and if he will break clown this figure by each centre and sub-centre and (b) how many visits to the homes of patients unable to travel were undertaken by the staff of these centres; and sub-centres and if he will break down this figure by each centre and sub-centre.
The information requested is not readily available. However, most new patients needing an artificial leg receive a temporary prosthesis on their second visit to a centre. The provision of a definitive limb requires a minimum of two or three further visits. It is seldom necessary for the staff of centres to visit amputees at home.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services in what proportion of attendances at centres and sub-centres for limb fitting the client used the National Health Service ambulance service; and what other forms of transport are available.
Precise figures are not available, but it is estimated that 50–60 per cent. of limb patients are carried to and from centres by the ambulance service. Depending on patients' needs the ambulance service may arrange transport by various means including the hospital car service, privately contracted services and vehicles used jointly with local authorities.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what investigations into the artificial limb service are currently in progress or have recently ended; and if he intends to publish their findings.
I expect later this year to receive, the results of a survey of patients' experience of the artificial limb service, and we will then consider whether to publish them. I am considering what further study of the service may be needed.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what number of attendances for limb fitting of persons from Lincolnshire, Gloucestershire, Hereford and Worcestershire, Dyfed and Powys took place at the Nottingham, Oxford, Avon, Birmingham, Cardiff and Swansea artificial limb and appliance centres in the last week for which figures are available.
During the week ending Friday 1 July, the number of attendances for limb fitting was:
Nottingham Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre
- 24 patients from Lincolnshire.
Oxford Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre
- 3 patients from Gloucestershire.
Bristol Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre
- 17 patients from Gloucestershire.
- 1 patient from Hereford.
Birmingham Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre
- 22 patients from Hereford and Worcestershire.
Cardiff Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre
- 2 patients from Dyfed.
- 1 patient from Powys.
Swansea Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre
- 9 patients from Dyfed.
- 1 patient from Powys.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) in each of the last three years, how many prostheses manufactured overseas were supplied by the limb service in England;(2) if he will give brief descriptions of all prostheses supplied by overseas manufacturers in the last 12 months through the limb service in England;(3) what is the Government's policy with regard to the supply by the English artificial limb service of prostheses manufactured overseas where no limb of a comparable design or containing comparable materials is available from British manufacturers.
Prostheses and components manufactured overseas may be prescribed where it is decided that they best meet a patient's special requirements. Information on the kinds and number supplied is not readily available.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many artificial limbs were supplied in each of the last three years for which figures are available; and if he will break down this figure (a) by each artificial limb and appliance centre or sub-centre and limb fitting centre or sub-centre and (b) by category of artificial limb.
The information available is given in the following tables:
| Artificial limbs supplied by type of limb and appliance centre | |||
| 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | |
| Metal limb for amputation through hip | |||
| Birmingham | 10 | 5 | 8 |
| Brighton | 6 | 6 | 3 |
| Bristol | 7 | 3 | 1 |
| Cambridge | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Carlisle | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Cleveland | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Exeter | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Gillingham | 8 | 4 | 1 |
| Harold Wood | 7 | 12 | 11 |
| Hull | 1 | 2 | — |
| Leeds | 9 | 9 | 7 |
| Leicester | 5 | 7 | 3 |
| Liverpool | 11 | 9 | 14 |
| Manchester | 15 | 19 | 20 |
| Newcastle | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Norwich | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Nottingham | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Oxford | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| Plymouth | — | 1 | 2 |
| Portsmouth | 1 | 11 | 3 |
| Preston | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Ringwood | — | 1 | 1 |
| Roehampton | 28 | 26 | 25 |
| Sheffield | 6 | 11 | 12 |
| Stanmore | 4 | 9 | 16 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | — | 2 | 1 |
| Wolverhampton | 2 | — | 3 |
| TOTAL | 148 | 173 | 173 |
| 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | |
| Conventional metal limb for above knee amputation | |||
| Birmingham | 96 | 99 | 120 |
| Brighton | 61 | 67 | 111 |
| Bristol | 71 | 62 | 57 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
| Cambridge | 15 | 14 | 18 |
| Carlisle | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Cleveland | 44 | 41 | 44 |
| Exeter | 65 | 51 | 48 |
| Gillingham | 73 | 62 | 44 |
| Harold Wood | 120 | 132 | 131 |
| Hull | 23 | 22 | 18 |
| Leeds | 176 | 125 | 127 |
| Leicester | 29 | 20 | 19 |
| Liverpool | 129 | 87 | 100 |
| Manchester | 58 | 62 | 60 |
| Newcastle | 23 | 22 | 28 |
| Norwich | 13 | 26 | 27 |
| Nottingham | 49 | 29 | 35 |
| Oxford | 101 | 93 | 106 |
| Plymouth | 34 | 41 | 29 |
| Portsmouth | 105 | 74 | 76 |
| Preston | 23 | 44 | 43 |
| Ringwood | 32 | 33 | 30 |
| Roehampton | 196 | 201 | 192 |
| Sheffield | 96 | 93 | 109 |
| Stanmore | 54 | 43 | 37 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 14 | 25 | 23 |
| Wolverhampton | 28 | 25 | 35 |
| TOTAL | 1,734 | 1,600 | 1,675 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Modular limb for above knee amputation
| |||
| Birmingham | 44 | 36 | 43 |
| Brighton | 37 | 16 | 9 |
| Bristol | 11 | 15 | 17 |
| Cambridge | 41 | 51 | 35 |
| Carlisle | 46 | 35 | 41 |
| Cleveland | 42 | 26 | 22 |
| Exeter | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Gillingham | 37 | 29 | 25 |
| Harold Wood | 65 | 39 | 48 |
| Hull | 8 | 17 | 11 |
| Leeds | 42 | 20 | 24 |
| Leicester | 14 | 12 | 15 |
| Liverpool | 125 | 71 | 58 |
| Manchester | 160 | 130 | 117 |
| Newcastle | 106 | 74 | 50 |
| Norwich | 20 | 17 | 15 |
| Nottingham | 60 | 56 | 61 |
| Oxford | 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Plymouth | 1 | — | 1 |
| Portsmouth | 12 | 10 | 11 |
| Preston | 99 | 57 | 42 |
| Ringwood | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| Roehampton | 136 | 130 | 164 |
| Sheffield | 82 | 69 | 56 |
| Stanmore | 102 | 92 | 83 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Wolverhampton | 6 | 12 | 10 |
| TOTAL | 1,308 | 1,036 | 978 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Conventional metal limb for below/through knee amputation
| |||
| Birmingham | 167 | 184 | 174 |
| Brighton | 59 | 69 | 67 |
| Bristol | 219 | 188 | 155 |
| Cambridge | 52 | 57 | 65 |
| Carlisle | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| Cleveland | 45 | 47 | 59 |
| Exeter | 128 | 158 | 121 |
| Gillingham | 118 | 85 | 86 |
| Harold Wood | 112 | 148 | 183 |
| Hull | 32 | 32 | 36 |
| Leeds | 129 | 139 | 121 |
| Leicester | 20 | 21 | 16 |
| Liverpool | 92 | 72 | 83 |
| Manchester | 142 | 138 | 125 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
| Newcastle | 48 | 47 | 55 |
| Norwich | 31 | 40 | 40 |
| Nottingham | 91 | 106 | 95 |
| Oxford | 169 | 175 | 196 |
| Plymouth | 114 | 100 | 110 |
| Portsmouth | 165 | 114 | 162 |
| Preston | 55 | 55 | 60 |
| Ringwood | 58 | 55 | 42 |
| Roehampton | 298 | 293 | 347 |
| Sheffield | 56 | 57 | 80 |
| Stanmore | 79 | 54 | 56 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 24 | 51 | 64 |
| Wolverhampton | 73 | 58 | 53 |
| TOTAL | 2,584 | 2,551 | 2,658 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Wooden limb for all sites of amputation
| |||
| Birmingham | 28 | 30 | 23 |
| Brighton | 16 | 11 | 17 |
| Bristol | 6 | 10 | 5 |
| Cambridge | 6 | 12 | 18 |
| Carlisle | 1 | 5 | 2 |
| Cleveland | 4 | 7 | 3 |
| Exeter | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Gillingham | 17 | 7 | 9 |
| Harold Wood | 20 | 18 | 28 |
| Hull | — | 2 | 1 |
| Leeds | 7 | 8 | 12 |
| Leicester | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Liverpool | 55 | 40 | 24 |
| Manchester | 77 | 45 | 51 |
| Newcastle | 30 | 34 | 29 |
| Norwich | 4 | 8 | 9 |
| Nottingham | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| Oxford | 14 | 17 | 3 |
| Plymouth | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Portsmouth | 15 | 14 | 8 |
| Preston | 13 | 13 | 16 |
| Ringwood | 1 | — | 2 |
| Roehampton | 69 | 85 | 90 |
| Sheffield | 5 | 9 | 10 |
| Stanmore | 24 | 26 | 28 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 2 | 5 | 4 |
| Wolverhampton | 13 | 11 | 5 |
| TOTAL | 448 | 438 | 431 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Conventional limb for below knee amputation
| |||
| Birmingham | 46 | 46 | 35 |
| Brighton | 24 | 43 | 50 |
| Bristol | 13 | 3 | 11 |
| Cambridge | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| Carlisle | 16 | 20 | 30 |
| Cleveland | 45 | 38 | 52 |
| Exeter | 41 | 23 | 15 |
| Gillingham | 41 | 31 | 35 |
| Harold Wood | 60 | 41 | 46 |
| Hull | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Leeds | 84 | 65 | 66 |
| Leicester | 15 | 12 | 16 |
| Liverpool | 76 | 54 | 91 |
| Manchester | 46 | 26 | 36 |
| Newcastle | 151 | 160 | 181 |
| Norwich | 8 | 8 | 15 |
| Nottingham | 26 | 19 | 27 |
| Oxford | 40 | 34 | 39 |
| Plymouth | 37 | 24 | 6 |
| Portsmouth | 33 | 32 | 40 |
| Preston | 26 | 26 | 17 |
| Ringwood | 13 | 8 | 10 |
| Roehampton | 143 | 137 | 149 |
| Sheffield | 6 | 3 | 4 |
| Stanmore | 17 | 22 | 26 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 8 | 6 | 8 |
| Wolverhampton | 12 | 17 | 17 |
| TOTAL | 1,037 | 910 | 1,033 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Modular limb for below knee amputation
| |||
| Birmingham | 163 | 136 | 175 |
| Brighton | 98 | 86 | 45 |
| Bristol | 23 | 18 | 21 |
| Cambridge | 71 | 69 | 48 |
| Carlisle | 16 | 3 | — |
| Cleveland | 21 | 18 | 14 |
| Exeter | 17 | 7 | 12 |
| Gillingham | 116 | 100 | 93 |
| Harold Wood | 165 | 141 | 90 |
| Hull | 29 | 10 | 10 |
| Leeds | 65 | 46 | 33 |
| Leicester | 57 | 62 | 81 |
| Liverpool | 117 | 78 | 59 |
| Manchester | 111 | 106 | 138 |
| Newcastle | 27 | 3 | 4 |
| Norwich | 50 | 54 | 61 |
| Nottingham | 131 | 115 | 162 |
| Oxford | 25 | 10 | 17 |
| Plymouth | 16 | 9 | 7 |
| Portsmouth | 42 | 58 | 33 |
| Preston | 44 | 36 | 42 |
| Ringwood | 25 | 7 | 8 |
| Roehampton | 260 | 231 | 292 |
| Sheffield | 131 | 146 | 129 |
| Stanmore | 158 | 170 | 148 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 21 | 18 | 23 |
| Wolverhampton | 61 | 42 | 49 |
| TOTAL | 2,060 | 1,779 | 1,794 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Primary limb for above knee amputation
| |||
| Birmingham | 113 | 175 | 130 |
| Brighton | 11 | 66 | 51 |
| Bristol | 40 | 25 | 82 |
| Cambridge | 31 | 50 | 66 |
| Carlisle | — | 2 | 1 |
| Cleveland | 2 | 35 | 53 |
| Exeter | 38 | 80 | 76 |
| Gillingham | 79 | 87 | 99 |
| Harold Wood | 61 | 123 | 150 |
| Hull | 8 | 22 | 25 |
| Leeds | 48 | 98 | 119 |
| Leicester | 10 | 22 | 28 |
| Liverpool | 30 | 85 | 81 |
| Manchester | 142 | 183 | 173 |
| Newcastle | — | 63 | 102 |
| Norwich | 27 | 37 | 33 |
| Nottingham | 22 | 38 | 57 |
| Oxford | 15 | 20 | 36 |
| Plymouth | 14 | 39 | 39 |
| Portsmouth | 10 | 33 | 44 |
| Preston | 78 | 78 | 69 |
| Ringwood | 1 | 4 | 9 |
| Roehampton | 68 | 137 | 157 |
| Sheffield | 16 | 47 | 52 |
| Stanmore | 3 | 21 | 98 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 10 | 15 | 21 |
| Wolverhampton | 54 | 65 | 56 |
| TOTAL | 931 | 1,650 | 1,907 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Temporary limb Birmingham (pylon) for new amputees—all sites of amputation
| |||
| Birmingham | 431 | 398 | 344 |
| Brighton | 175 | 156 | 147 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
| Bristol | 247 | 244 | 223 |
| Cambridge | 99 | 135 | 135 |
| Carlisle | 26 | 30 | 25 |
| Cleveland | 135 | 71 | 80 |
| Exeter | 236 | 193 | 171 |
| Gillingham | 223 | 270 | 209 |
| Harold Wood | 472 | 403 | 409 |
| Hull | 76 | 112 | 100 |
| Leeds | 403 | 424 | 356 |
| Leicester | 106 | 134 | 98 |
| Liverpool | 486 | 502 | 471 |
| Manchester | 533 | 507 | 477 |
| Newcastle | 215 | 168 | 138 |
| Norwich | 143 | 122 | 124 |
| Nottingham | 278 | 305 | 273 |
| Oxford | 227 | 238 | 227 |
| Plymouth | 151 | 126 | 151 |
| Portsmouth | 249 | 212 | 208 |
| Preston | 176 | 159 | 204 |
| Ringwood | 67 | 77 | 46 |
| Roehampton | 637 | 603 | 562 |
| Sheffield | 245 | 283 | 247 |
| Stanmore | 289 | 315 | 262 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 56 | 73 | 81 |
| Wolverhampton | 124 | 100 | 119 |
| TOTAL | 6,505 | 6,360 | 5,887 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Limbs/appliances for congenital deformity
| |||
| Birmingham | 26 | 25 | 23 |
| Brighton | 17 | 12 | 9 |
| Bristol | 21 | 9 | 19 |
| Cambridge | 4 | 5 | 8 |
| Carlisle | — | — | — |
| Cleveland | — | — | — |
| Exeter | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Gillingham | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| Harold Wood | 19 | 18 | 24 |
| Hull | 5 | 7 | 1 |
| Leeds | 24 | 16 | 8 |
| Leicester | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Liverpool | 25 | 13 | 42 |
| Manchester | 44 | 44 | 43 |
| Newcastle | 14 | 16 | 11 |
| Norwich | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| Nottingham | 8 | 8 | 6 |
| Oxford | 14 | 18 | 15 |
| Plymouth | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Portsmouth | 13 | 17 | 13 |
| Preston | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Ringwood | 5 | 1 | — |
| Roehampton | 34 | 50 | 48 |
| Sheffield | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Stanmore | 5 | 11 | 7 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Wolverhampton | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| TOTAL | 311 | 306 | 317 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Total number of lower limbs
| |||
| Birmingham | 1,124 | 1,134 | 1,084 |
| Brighton | 504 | 532 | 509 |
| Bristol | 638 | 577 | 591 |
| Cambridge | 327 | 404 | 404 |
| Carlisle | 121 | 106 | 115 |
| Cleveland | 342 | 287 | 333 |
| Exeter | 540 | 537 | 472 |
| Gillingham | 719 | 683 | 609 |
| Harold Wood | 1,101 | 1,075 | 1,120 |
| Hull | 187 | 231 | 205 |
| Leeds | 987 | 950 | 873 |
| Leicester | 261 | 296 | 286 |
| Liveroool | 1,146 | 1,011 | 1,023 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
| Manchester | 1,328 | 1,260 | 1,240 |
| Newcastle | 617 | 589 | 600 |
| Norwich | 302 | 319 | 332 |
| Nottingnam | 678 | 690 | 733 |
| Oxford | 609 | 615 | 646 |
| Plymouth | 376 | 349 | 351 |
| Portsmouth | 645 | 575 | 598 |
| Preston | 521 | 476 | 502 |
| Ringwood | 205 | 191 | 150 |
| Roehampton | 1,869 | 1,893 | 2,026 |
| Sheffield | 649 | 724 | 706 |
| Stanmore | 735 | 763 | 761 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 139 | 202 | 233 |
| Wolverhampton | 376 | 334 | 351 |
| TOTAL | 17,066 | 16,803 | 16,853 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Limb for above/through elbow amputation
| |||
| Birmingham | 32 | 24 | 29 |
| Brighton Bristol | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Cambridge | 12 | 12 | 10 |
| Carlisle | 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Cleveland | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Exeter | 11 | 8 | 1 |
| Gillingham | 6 | 14 | 9 |
| Harold Wood | 18 | 10 | 14 |
| Hull | 10 | 3 | 3 |
| Leeds | 22 | 22 | 20 |
| Leicester | 3 | 4 | — |
| Liverpool | 41 | 11 | 9 |
| Manchester | 28 | 32 | 20 |
| Newcastle | 17 | 18 | 14 |
| Norwich | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Nottingham | 15 | 13 | 12 |
| Oxford | 22 | 17 | 13 |
| Plymouth | 9 | 6 | 11 |
| Portsmouth | 5 | 12 | 12 |
| Preston | 24 | 16 | 17 |
| Ringwood | 2 | 2 | — |
| Roehampton | 59 | 50 | 59 |
| Sheffield | 12 | 9 | 5 |
| Stanmore | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 7 | 5 | — |
| Wolverhampton | — | — | — |
| TOTAL | 399 | 314 | 293 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Limb for below elbow to through wrist amputation
| |||
| Birmingham | 89 | 81 | 06 |
| Brighton | 13 | 15 | 17 |
| Bristol | 39 | 26 | 32 |
| Cambridge | 35 | 28 | 32 |
| Carlisle | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| Cleveland | 14 | 6 | 9 |
| Exeter | 20 | 25 | 25 |
| Gillingham | 17 | 23 | 27 |
| Harold Wood | 48 | 45 | 50 |
| Hull | 11 | 10 | 14 |
| Leeds | 69 | 48 | 38 |
| Leicester | 21 | 16 | 9 |
| Liverpool | 75 | 44 | 46 |
| Manchester | 142 | 119 | 139 |
| Newcastle | 30 | 37 | 33 |
| Norwich | 10 | 15 | 13 |
| Nottingham | 30 | 34 | 39 |
| Oxford | 37 | 37 | 38 |
| Plymouth | 9 | 12 | 9 |
| Portsmouth | 27 | 34 | 27 |
| Preston | 35 | 27 | 17 |
| Ringwood | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Roehampton | 120 | 125 | 138 |
| Sheffield | 38 | 32 | 35 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
| Stanmore | 30 | 23 | 24 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 6 | 11 | 7 |
| Wolverhampton | — | — | 1 |
| TOTAL | 974 | 881 | 898 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Limb for partial hand deformity
| |||
| Birmingham | 65 | 62 | 69 |
| Brighton | 14 | 14 | 11 |
| Bristol | 22 | 22 | 32 |
| Cambridge | 13 | 12 | 12 |
| Carlisle | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| Cleveland | 10 | 10 | 21 |
| Exeter | 23 | 12 | 9 |
| Gillingham | 33 | 45 | 28 |
| Harold Wood | 44 | 55 | 59 |
| Hull | 19 | 27 | 22 |
| Leeds | 66 | 47 | 43 |
| Leicester | 10 | 14 | 10 |
| Liverpool | 52 | 37 | 29 |
| Manchester | 82 | 84 | 73 |
| Newcastle | 27 | 26 | 34 |
| Norwich | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| Nottingham | 39 | 33 | 32 |
| Oxford | 38 | 39 | 20 |
| Plymouth | 11 | 8 | 7 |
| Portsmouth | 28 | 17 | 15 |
| Preston | 34 | 33 | 44 |
| Ringwood | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Roehampton | 120 | 158 | 143 |
| Sheffield | 42 | 34 | 40 |
| Stanmore | 21 | 35 | 33 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Wolverhampton | — | — | — |
| TOTAL | 828 | 838 | 800 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Limb for minor amputations (finger, thumb, etc.)
| |||
| Birmingham | 29 | 35 | 23 |
| Brighton | 4 | 6 | 1 |
| Bristol | 8 | 8 | 11 |
| Cambridge | 7 | 10 | 6 |
| Carlisle | — | — | 4 |
| Cleveland | — | — | — |
| Exeter | 15 | 4 | 3 |
| Gillingham | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| Harold Wood | 15 | 12 | 10 |
| Hull | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Leeds | 8 | 10 | 2 |
| Leicester | 4 | — | 8 |
| Liverpool | 20 | 10 | 6 |
| Manchester | 43 | 62 | 43 |
| Newcastle | 10 | 7 | 8 |
| Norwich | 2 | — | 2 |
| Nottingham | 9 | 9 | 11 |
| Oxford | 15 | 12 | 7 |
| Plymouth | 4 | 1 | 6 |
| Portsmouth | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| Preston | 16 | 20 | 27 |
| Ringwood | 2 | — | — |
| Roehampton | 49 | 66 | 48 |
| Sheffield | 3 | 7 | 12 |
| Stanmore | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 1 | 3 | — |
| Wolverhampton | — | — | — |
| TOTAL | 277 | 292 | 249 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
Myo-electric hand
| |||
| Birmingham | 2 | 2 | 3 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
| Brighton | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Bristol | 9 | 6 | 9 |
| Cambridge | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Carlisle | — | — | — |
| Cleveland | 1 | — | — |
| Exeter | — | — | — |
| Gillingham | — | — | 2 |
| Harold Wood | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Hull | — | — | 1 |
| Leeds | — | — | — |
| Leicester | — | — | — |
| Liverpool | 1 | 2 | — |
| Manchester | 9 | 6 | 26 |
| Newcastle | — | 1 | 3 |
| Norwich | — | — | 1 |
| Nottingham | — | — | 1 |
| Oxford | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Plymouth | — | — | — |
| Portsmouth | 1 | 1 | — |
| Preston | — | 2 | — |
| Ringwood | — | — | — |
| Roehampton | 9 | 12 | 23 |
| Sheffield | — | 1 | — |
| Stanmore | 1 | 1 | — |
| Stoke-on-Trent | — | — | — |
| Wolverhampton | — | — | — |
| TOTAL | 37 | 40 | 79 |
1980
| 1981
| 1982
| |
| TOTAL NUMBER OF UPPER LIMBS | |||
| Birmingham | 217 | 204 | 192 |
| Brighton | 35 | 40 | 40 |
| Bristol | 92 | 67 | 93 |
| Cambridge | 68 | 63 | 62 |
| Carlisle | 18 | 14 | 16 |
| Cleveland | 29 | 18 | 31 |
| Exeter | 69 | 49 | 38 |
| Gillingham | 60 | 83 | 69 |
| Harold Wood | 126 | 123 | 135 |
| Hull | 43 | 42 | 41 |
| Leeds | 165 | 127 | 103 |
| Leicester | 38 | 34 | 27 |
| Liverpool | 189 | 104 | 90 |
| Manchester | 304 | 303 | 301 |
| Newcastle | 84 | 89 | 92 |
| Norwich | 26 | 26 | 24 |
| Nottingham | 93 | 89 | 95 |
| Oxford | 113 | 108 | 79 |
| Plymouth | 33 | 27 | 33 |
| Portsmouth | 62 | 68 | 56 |
| Preston | 109 | 98 | 105 |
| Ringwood | 10 | 8 | 11 |
| Roehampton | 357 | 411 | 411 |
| Sheffield | 95 | 83 | 92 |
| Stanmore | 63 | 67 | 71 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | 17 | 20 | 11 |
| Wolverhampton | — | — | 1 |
| TOTAL | 2,515 | 2,365 | 2,319 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many staff are employed in the artificial limb service at each artificial limb and appliance centre or sub-centre and limb fitting centre or sub-centre; and if he will break down each figure, and the national figure, by occupational category and employer.
The information requested is given in the following table:
Staff employed in the artificial limbs service
| ||||
Executive and clerical
| Medical offices
| Technical offices
| SDOS/Packers
| |
Employed by DHSS
| ||||
| Birmingham | 18 | 3 | — | 6 |
| Brighton | 8 | 1 | — | 3 |
| Bristol | 9 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Cambridge | 6 | 1 | — | 3 |
| Carlisle | 1 | — | — | 1 |
| Cleveland | 6 | 1 | — | 2 |
| Exeter | 7 | 1 | — | 2 |
| Gillingham | 8 | 1 | — | 3 |
| Harold Wood | 13 | 2 | — | 5 |
| Hull | 1 | — | — | 2 |
| Leeds | 16 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Leicester | 1 | — | — | 1 |
| Liverpool | 11 | 2 | — | 3 |
| Manchester | 18 | 3 | — | 4 |
| Newcastle | 12 | 2 | — | 4 |
| Norwich | 2 | 1 | — | 2 |
| Nottingham | 10 | 2 | — | 4 |
| Oxford | 8 | 1 | — | 2 |
| Plymouth | 1 | — | — | 2 |
| Portsmouth | 10 | 1 | — | 3 |
| Preston | 8 | — | — | 2 |
| Ringwood | 1 | — | — | — |
| Roehampton | 36 | 7 | *15 | 12 |
| Sheffield | 9 | 1 | .— | 2 |
| Stanmore | 2 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | — | — | — | — |
| Wolverhampton | 1 | — | 1 | |
| NATIONAL TOTAL | 223 | 36 | 19 | 77 |
| * Nine technical officers are based at Roehampton but travel to other centres. | ||||
Physiotherapists
| Occupational therapists
| Nurses
| Porters
| Medical Secretaries
| |
Employed by NHS
| |||||
| Birmingham | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Brighton | — | — | — | — | — |
| Bristol | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Cambridge | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Carlisle | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cleveland | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Exeter | 1 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Gillingham | — | — | — | — | — |
| Harold Wood | 2 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Hull | — | — | — | — | — |
| Leeds | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Leicester | — | — | — | — | — |
| Liverpool | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Manchester | 2 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Newcastle | 2 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Norwich | — | — | — | — | — |
| Nottingham | 2 | — | — | — | — |
| Oxford | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Plymouth | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Portsmouth | 2 | — | — | — | — |
| Preston | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Ringwood | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Roehampton | 4 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Sheffield | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Stanmore | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wolverhamplon | — | — | — | — | — |
| NATIONAL TOTAL | 27 | 10 | 16 | 1 | 1 |
Administrative and clerical staff
| Prosthetists
| Bench technicians
| |
J. E. Hanger and Co. Ltd.
| |||
| Birmingham | 1 | 6 | 12 |
| Brighton | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Bristol | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| Cambridge | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Carlisle | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Cleveland | — | — | — |
| Exeter | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Gillingham | 1 | 2 | 7 |
Administrative and clerical staff
| Prosthetists
| Bench technicians
| |
| Harold Wood | 2 | 10 | 19 |
| Hull | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Leeds | 1 | 6 | 14 |
| Leicester | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Liverpool | 1 | 5 | 11 |
| Manchester | 1 | 4 | 15 |
| Newcastle | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| Norwich | — | 2 | 2 |
| Nottingham | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Oxford | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Plymouth | — | — | — |
| Portsmouth | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Preston | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Ringwood | — | — | — |
| Roehampton | 6 | 20 | — |
| Sheffield | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Stanmore | — | — | — |
| Stoke-on-Trent | — | — | — |
| Wolverhampton | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| NATIONAL TOTAL | 27 | 88 | 143 |
Administrative and clerical staff
| Prosthetists
| Bench technicians
| |
Chas A Blatchford and Sons Ltd.
| |||
| Birmingham | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Brighton | — | 1 | 2 |
| Bristol | — | — | — |
| Cambridge | — | — | — |
| Carlisle | — | — | — |
| Cleveland | — | — | — |
| Exeter | — | — | — |
| Gillingham | — | 2 | 2 |
| Harold Wood | — | — | — |
| Hull | — | — | — |
| Leeds | — | — | — |
| Leicester | — | — | — |
| Liverpool | — | 1 | 1 |
| Manchester | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Newcastle | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Norwich | — | — | — |
| Nottingham | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Oxford | — | — | — |
| Plymouth | — | — | — |
| Portsmouth | — | 2 | 2 |
| Preston | — | 2 | 1 |
| Ringwood | — | — | — |
| Roehampton | 1 | 6 | 10 |
| Sheffield | — | — | — |
| Stanmore | 1 | 6 | 10 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | — | — | — |
| Wolverhampton | — | — | — |
| NATIONAL TOTAL | 6 | 32 | 57 |
Administrative and clerical staff
| Prosthetists
| Bench technicians
| |
Vessa Ltd.
| |||
| Birmingham | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Brighton | — | 2 | 3 |
| Bristol | — | 3 | 3 |
| Cambridge | — | 4 | 3 |
| Carlisle | — | — | — |
| Cleveland | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Exeter | — | — | — |
| Gillingham | — | 1 | 2 |
| Harold Wood | — | — | — |
| Hull | — | — | — |
| Leeds | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Leicester | — | — | — |
| Liverpool | — | 2 | 2 |
Administrative and clerical staff
| Prosthetists
| Bench technicians
| |
| Manchester | — | 2 | 4 |
| Newcastle | — | — | — |
| Norwich | — | — | — |
| Nottingham | — | 2 | 2 |
| Oxford | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| Plymouth | — | 3 | 4 |
| Portsmouth | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Preston | — | — | — |
| Ringwood | — | — | — |
| Roehampton | 2 | 7 | 10 |
| Sheffield | — | — | — |
| Stanmore | — | — | — |
| Stoke-on-Trent | — | — | — |
| Wolverhampton | — | — | — |
| NATIONAL TOTAL | 7 | 42 | 52 |
Administrative and clerical staff
| Prosthetists
| Bench technicians
| |
J. Stubbs and Sons Ltc.
| |||
| Birmingham | — | — | — |
| Brighton | — | — | — |
| Bristol | — | — | — |
| Cambridge | — | — | — |
| Carlisle | — | — | — |
| Cleveland | — | — | — |
| Exeter | — | — | — |
| Gillingham | — | — | — |
| Harold Wood | — | — | — |
| Hull | — | — | — |
| Leeds | — | — | — |
| Leicester | — | — | — |
| Liverpool | — | — | — |
| Manchester | — | 2 | — |
| Newcastle | — | — | — |
| Norwich | — | — | — |
| Nottingham | — | — | — |
| Oxford | — | — | — |
| Plymouth | — | — | — |
| Portsmouth | — | — | — |
| Preston | — | — | — |
| Ringwood | — | — | — |
| Roehampton | — | — | — |
| Sheffield | — | 3 | 1 |
| Stanmore | — | — | — |
| Stoke-on-Trent | — | — | — |
| Wolverhampton | — | — | — |
| NATIONAL TOTAL | — | 5 | 1 |
Administrative and clerical staff
| Prosthetists
| Bench technicians
| |
F. J. Cossings and Son (Leeds) Ltd.
| |||
| Birmingham | — | — | — |
| Brighton | — | — | — |
| Bristol | — | — | — |
| Cambridge | — | — | — |
Administrative and clerical staff
| Prosthetists
| Bench technicians
| |
| Carlisle | — | — | — |
| Cleveland | — | — | — |
| Exeter | — | — | — |
| Gillingham | — | — | — |
| Harold Wood | — | — | — |
| Hull | — | — | — |
| Leeds | — | 2 | — |
| Leicester | — | — | — |
| Liverpool | — | — | — |
| Manchester | — | — | — |
| Newcastle | — | — | — |
| Norwich | — | — | — |
| Nottingham | — | — | — |
| Oxford | — | — | — |
| Plymouth | — | — | — |
| Portsmouth | — | — | — |
| Preston | — | — | — |
| Ringwood | — | — | — |
| Roehampton | — | — | — |
| Sheffield | — | 1 | — |
| Stanmore | — | — | — |
| Stoke-on-Trent | — | — | — |
| Wolverhampton | — | — | — |
| NATIONAL TOTAL | — | 3 | — |
Administrative and clerical staff
| Prosthetists
| Bench technicians
| |
Hugh Steeper Ltd.
| |||
| Birmingham | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Brighton | — | — | — |
| Bristol | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Cambridge | — | — | — |
| Carlisle | — | — | — |
| Cleveland | — | — | — |
| Exeter | — | — | — |
| Gillingham | — | — | — |
| Harold Wood | — | 1 | 1 |
| Hull | — | — | — |
| Leeds | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Leicester | — | — | — |
| Liverpool | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Manchester | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Newcastle | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Norwich | — | — | — |
| Nottingham | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Oxford | — | — | — |
| Plymouth | — | — | — |
| Portsmouth | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Preston | — | — | — |
| Ringwood | — | — | — |
| Roehampton | 1 | 6 | 11 |
| Sheffield | — | — | — |
| Stanmore | — | — | — |
| Stoke-on-Trent | — | — | — |
| Wolverhampton | — | — | — |
| NATIONAL TOTAL | 9 | 23 | 36 |