Written Answers To Questions
Wednesday 30 November 1983
Energy
Pre-Payment Meters
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what is the total number of pre-payment (a) electricity and (b) gas meters installed in the homes of domestic users throughout the United Kingdom.
This is a matter for the industries concerned. I am asking the chairman of the Electricity Council and the British Gas Corporation to write to the hon. Member.
Gas Meters
asked the Secretary of State for Energy how many gas meters were questioned by domestic consumers for their accuracy in 1980, 1981, 1982 and to the nearest available date in 1983.
The total numbers of disputed gas meters submitted to my Department for testing were as follows:
| Numbers | |
| 1980 | 6,124 |
| 1981 | 7,286 |
| 1982 | 8,472 |
| *1983 | 13,537 |
| * Up to 31 October 1983. | |
Coal Industry
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what will be the Government subsidy to the coal industry in the financial years to 31 March 1984 and 1985.
The NCB's deficit grant limit for 1983–84, as provided for in the Estimates, is £409 million for 1984–85, the Government expect to make Estimates provision for a limit of at least as much as this year.
Departmental Staff
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what were the manpower levels in his Department in June 1983; and what are his plans for those levels in June 1984.
Staff in post at the nearest date for the quarterly manpower count was 1,088 at 1 July 1983. The manpower figures planned for 1984–85 are 1,110 at 1 April 1984 and 1,106 at 1 April 1985; no specific figure is planned for June 1984.
Coal Imports
asked the Secretary of State for Energy (1) how many tonnes of coal have been imported from (a) China, (b) Morocco, (c) Sweden and (d) the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics to the nearest available date in 1983;(2) what is the average value of a tonne of coal imported into the United Kingdom from
(a) China, (b) Morocco, (c) Sweden and (d) the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
With respect to the first nine months of 1983 the information requested is as follows:
| Volume (000 tonnes) | Average value, cif (£ per tonne) | |
| China | 5 | 104 |
| Morocco | 12 | 86 |
| Sweden | 1 | 89 |
| Union of Soviet Socialist Republics | 16 | 78 |
Corby
asked the Secretary of State for Energy how many schemes have been approved and how much grant was payable under section 13 of the Industrial Development Act 1982 and section 7 of the Local Employment Act 1972 in the Corby development area within his Department's area of responsibility in each year since 1979–80.
None.
British Gas Corporation (Financial Targets)
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what price for new industrial gas contracts he has taken into account in formulating his proposals on new financial targets for the British Gas Corporation.
The current freeze on industrial contract gas prices is due to end on 31 December 1983. Decisions about any extension to the freeze or any increase in prices are a matter for the British Gas Corporation.
Domestic Gas Market (Revenue)
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what is the current average revenue per therm for the domestic gas market.
The British Gas Corporation's latest annual report and accounts show that, in 1982–83, the average revenue per therm in the domestic gas market was 37·9 per therm.
Gas Connections
asked the Secretary of State for Energy how many domestic gas consumers and how many firms are currently waiting to be connected.
This is a matter for the British Gas Corporation. I am asking the chairman to write to my right hon. Friend.
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Aid
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will now give the details he promised in his statement of 17 November of the additional aid proposed for the glasshouse industry and the marginal land areas and the proposed changes to the capital grant schemes.
We have today laid statutory instruments before Parliament modifying the capital grant schemes to reflect new orders of priority and changing circumstances and to continue the process of simplification begun by my predecessor. With the exception of the agriculture and horticulture co-operation scheme—AHCS—the changes, which are detailed in the following schedule, will come into effect immediately and will apply under the agriculture and horticulture grant scheme—AHGS—to expenditure incurred after 30 November and under the agriculture and horticulture development scheme—AHDS—to new applications or to variations received under that scheme or the farm and horticulture development scheme—FHDS—after that date.To assist the glasshouse sector, we propose to increase the rate of grant under the AHGS from 22·5 per cent. to 37·5 per cent. for the replacement or improvement of existing heated glasshouses, including thermal insulation, and allow businesses to invest up to about £30,000 above the present six-year ceiling of about £100,000 where this extra investment is wholly incurred for eligible energy saving facilities. Under the AHDS the rate of grant for the replacement of existing heated glasshouses will be increased from 32·5 per cent. to 50 per cent., but there will be no change in the investment ceiling for individual businesses. These changes are in line with the Government's policy of encouraging economy in the use of energy and their specific commitment to help the glasshouse industry. Their value to the industry is estimated at some £2 million per year.We wish to provide greater incentive for hedge planting and improvement, the construction and rebuilding of stone walls and planting of shelter belts in recognition not only of their agricultural importance but of their value in enhancing the upland landscape. Consequently, the less favoured areas rate of grant on these items will be increased by 10 percentage points to 60 per cent. At the same time, grant aid for hedge removal, where this is carried out as an essential part of another improvement, will be discontinued. Grant aid towards hedge removal has, since 1976, been restricted to this one item, and continuation is no longer justified. Its withdrawal will eliminate from the capital grant schemes all forms of assistance towards the costs of removing hedges.
| Schedule of Changes to Capital Grant Schemes | |||
| Standard Rate | Less Favoured Areas Rate | Horticultural Business Rate | |
| per cent. | per cent. | per cent. | |
| A. EEC Scheme | |||
| The replacement of or improvement to existing heated greenhouses (including the supply and installation of thermal insulation) | nil | nil | 50 (32·5) |
| The provision, replacement or improvement of permanent hedges, walls (and associated gates) | 32·5 (32·5) | 60·0 (50·0) | 32·5 (32·5) |
As part of our policy of concentrating incentives on the most important items of capital investment, only the main framework of buildings will in future qualify for AHGS grant, and not the internal fixtures and fittings. Furthermore, in order to bring the AHGS into line with the AHDS, pig and dairy units above a certain size will no longer qualify for grant under the AHGS for any items which directly benefit those particular enterprises. They may, however, continue to qualify for grant on investment in field drainage and other land works.
Grant will no longer be available under AHGS, AHDS and FHDS for the drying and storage of grain to be sold off the farm, or for machinery, plant and equipment, except for boilers and energy saving equipment for glasshouses and facilities for market preparation of harvested horticultural produce being sold fresh. The reclamation of land and the improvement of grassland outside the less favoured areas will also cease to be eligible under the AHGS. Finally, the standard rate of grant under the AHGS will be reduced from 22·5 per cent. to 20 per cent., except in the case of the time-limited orchard replanting scheme introduced earlier this year, for which grants will remain at 22·5 per cent.
We will continue to make provision under the AHCS for investments by cereals co-operatives, but at reduced rates of grant. We are also making consequential reductions in grant where similarities exist with the other grant schemes. From next April we are also making available an additional £200,000 for applications for non-capital grant.
These changes will, as I announced on 17 November, save about £30 million per year. Nevertheless, we are satisfied that these modified capital grant schemes will continue to help the industry to modernise and adapt, as they have done now so successfully for many years. We will, however, be assessing the effect of these changes on investment in the sectors affected.
We can also announce our plans for providing additional assistance to the marginal areas, in the 1984–85 financial year, in recognition of their special difficulties. When these areas are given less favoured area status by the Community, they will become eligible for LFA rates of capital grants, with the one exception of the provision of roads, grids, bridges and so on, for which the new standard rate of grant will apply. In addition, the Government will introduce HLCAs in marginal areas. For planning purposes we have in mind headage payments of about half the present LFA rates, but the actual rates would fall to be determined as part of the autumn 1984 review of the HLCAs. We have always keenly recognised the case for helping the marginal areas and we are sure that the measures proposed will restore confidence there.
Standard Rate
| Less Favoured Areas Rate
| Horticultural Business Rate
| |
per cent.
| per cent.
| per cent.
| |
| and shelter belts | 5·0 (5·0) | 60·0 (50·0) | 32·5 (32·5) |
| B. NATIONAL SCHEME | |||
| Provision etc, of: agricultural buildings | 20·0 (22·5) | 20·0 (22·5) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| buildings for drying and storage of grain for consumption by livestock kept on land | 20·0 (22·5) | 20·0 (22·5) | nil (nil) |
| The replacement of or other improvement to existing horticultural production buildings (including thermal insulation) | nil (nil) | nil (nil) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| The replacement of or improvement to existing heated greenhouses (including the supply and installation of thermal insulation) | nil (nil) | nil (nil) | 37·5 (22·5) |
| The provision etc. of buildings for horticultural use other than horticultural production buildings | nil (nil) | nil (nil) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| Electricity or gas supply | 20·0 (22·5) | 20·0 (22·5) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| Waste disposal systems | 20·0 (22·5) | 20·0 (22·5) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| Water supply and storage | 20·0 (22·5) | 50·0 (50·0) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| Field Drainage | 30·0 (37·5) | 60·0 (70·0) | 30·0 (37·5) |
| Flood prevention works | 20·0 (22·5) | 50·0 (50·0) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| (For Scotland only) | 50·0 (50·0) | 60·0 (70·0) | nil (nil) |
| Land Works: | |||
| roads, paths etc. | 20·0 (22·5) | 40·0 (50·0) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| pens, dips, stells etc. | 20·0 (22·5) | 50·0 (50·0) | nil (nil) |
| hedges, walls and associated gates | 20·0 (22·5) | 60·0 (50·0) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| permanent fences and associated gates | 20·0 (22·5) | 50·0 (50·0) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| shelter belts | nil (nil) | 60·0 (50·0) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| grassland works (including reclamation) | nil (22·5) | 50·0 (50·0) | *nil (22·5) |
| Orchard grubbing | 20·0 (22·5) | 20·0 (22·5) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| Stakes and wirework for hops | 20·0 (22·5) | 20·0 (22·5) | nil (nil) |
| Watercress beds | nil (nil) | nil (nil) | 20·0 (22·5) |
| C. COOPERATIVE SCHEME | |||
| Provision etc. of: | |||
| Buildings, facilities or land improvements, other than for grain storage or drying | 30·0 (32·5) | n/a | n/a |
| Buildings, facilities or land improvements for grain storage or drying | 15·0 (22·5) | n/a | n/a |
| Plant and equipment for grain storage or drying | 10·0 (15·0) | n/a | n/a |
* Reclamation etc. only. | |||
Items no longer eligible for grant are:
Common Agricultural Policy (Market Regulation)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will provide details of expenditure in 1982–83 and 1983–84 by the Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce and the agricultural departments on market regulation under the common agricultural policy.
Details of the outturn for 1982–83 and the latest forecast of outturn for 1983–84 are as follows:
Outturn 1982–83
| Latest forecast of outturn 1983–84
| |
£ million
| £ million
| |
(i) Expenditure by the Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce
| ||
| Cereals | 337·2 | 112·8 |
| Beef and Veal | 93·8 | 214·3 |
| Pigmeat | -39·8 | -19·9 |
| Sugar | 60·6 | 53·7 |
Outturn 1982–83
| Latest forecast of outturn 1983–84
| |
£ million
| £ million
| |
| Processed products | 27·4 | 35·1 |
| Milk products | 342·5 | 625·8 |
| Oil seeds | 76·3 | 78·3 |
| Sheepmeat | 126·1 | 126·9 |
| Others | 19·4 | 20·1 |
| Total | 1,043·5 | 1,247·1 |
(ii) Expenditure by the Agricultural Departments
| ||
| Milk non-marketing premiums | 17·8 | 13·4 |
| Suckler cow premium scheme | 16·4 | 16·6 |
| Annual premium on ewes | 21·4 | 79·7 |
| Total | 55·6 | 109·7 |
| Grand Total | 1,099·1 | 1,356·8 |
Expenditure includes the beef and sheepmeat variable premium schemes, (net of clawback for sheepmeat), the premium schemes for the non marketing of milk and the conversion of dairy herds, suckler cow premium scheme, annual premium on ewes, refunds on imports and exports (net of levies), the butter and school milk subsidies, and the net cost of buying commodities into intervention less proceeds from sales. It also takes account of certain receipts treated as negative expenditure, namely monetary compensatory amounts levied on intra-Community trade and the co-responsibility levy on milk producers. Of the estimated outturn for 1983–84 £1,015·5 million is expected to be financed from the European agricultural guidance and guarantee fund (EAGGF), the balance being financed from Exchequer funds. In 1982–83 £783·7 million was financed from EAGGF. Some of the expenditure shown above benefits consumers and trade interests rather than United Kingdom producers.
Grants And Subsidies (Expenditure)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will give details of expenditure in 1982–83 and 1983–84 by the agricultural departments on agricultural grants and subsidies excluding market regulation under the common agricultural policy.
Details of the outturn for 1982–83 and the latest forecast of outturn for 1983–84 are as follows:
| £ million | ||
| Outturn 1982–83 | Latest forecast of outturn 1983–84 | |
| Price guarantees | ||
| Wool | 6·2 | 3·2 |
| Potatoes | 1·9 | 10·9 |
| Total | 8·1 | 14·1 |
| Support for Capital and other improvements | ||
| Agriculture and Horticulture Development Scheme | 100·3 | 94·0 |
| Guidance Premiums | 5·5 | 4·4 |
| Farm Accounts | 1·9 | 1·7 |
| Farm Structure | 0·6 | 0·5 |
| Northern Ireland Agricultural Development Programme | 11·2 | 7·3 |
| Agriculture and Horticulature Grant Scheme | 83·6 | 84·4 |
| Co-operation Grants | 2·4 | 4·1 |
| Others | 0·5 | 0·8 |
| Total | 206·0 | 197·2 |
Outturn 1982–83
| Latest forecast of outturn 1983–84
| |
Support for Agriculture in Special Areas
| ||
| Hill Livestock Compensatory allowances | 88·3 | 93·9 |
| Additional benefit to farmers in special areas under AHDS, NIADP and AHGS | 28·7 | 22·2 |
| Others | 2·6 | 4·7 |
| Total | 119·6 | 120·8 |
| Grand Total | *333·7 | *332·1 |
* Some of this expenditure attracts contributions from the European agricultural guidance and guarantee fund. These are mainly received in the following year. In 1983–84 £67 million is expected to be received from the fund compared with £21·1 million in 1982–83. | ||
Humber Laboratory, Hull
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what decision he has reached on the future of the Humber laboratory, Hull.
I have considered carefully the views that have been put to me about the future of the Humber laboratory. I have concluded that it would be a more efficient use of resources if the work currently undertaken at that laboratory were transferred to the parent Torry research station, Aberdeen. Arrangements are therefore being put in hand for the Humber laboratory to be closed by 1 July 1984.
National Finance
Capital Gains Tax Roll-Over Relief
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he proposes to amend the rules for capital gains tax roll-over relief so that, when joint owners of land who farm it in partnership partition that land, roll-over relief will be available in those cases where they continue farming in partnership as well as those cases where the original partnership is dissolved and a new partnership is formed by the individual former partner.
I have noted this suggestion. If my hon. Friend has a particular case in mind, perhaps he would write to me about it.
"Official Report"
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer why copies of the Official Report for 18 November are no longer available in the Vote Office; and if he is arranging for a reprint of that day's edition.
The Vote Office received its normal supply of 750 copies of the Official Report for 18 November. In the interests of economy the Vote Office aims to avoid excessive holdings, and this quantity normally satisfies demand.A reprint of the
Official Report for 18 November has been completed and copies are now available from the Vote Office.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the print run for the Official Report for Friday 18 November and for each of the preceding four Fridays.
The information is as follows:
- Friday 18 November = 5,280
- Friday 11 November = 5,290
- Friday 4 November = 5,280
- Friday 28 October = 5,280
- Friday 29 July = 5,280
Safety Shoes (Taxation)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will zero-rate for value added tax purposes safety shoes on the same basis as safety boots are currently zero-rated.
No.
Local Government Expenditure
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will give a breakdown by country, England, Scotland and Wales, of the total of local authority excess of outturn 1982–83 over planned provision, detailed in his autumn statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 17 November 1983, c. 509]: The figures are not given in the autumn statement. The following table sets out the position.
| LA RSG-relevant current expenditure | ||
| Planned Provision £ million | Estimated outturn £ million | |
| England | 18,000·0 | 19,231 |
| Scotland | 2,429·0 | 2,562 |
| Wales | 1,129·2 | 1,158 |
| Total | 21,558·2 | 22,951 |
asked the the Chancellor of the Exchequer what inflation assumptions he has made in determing the overall level of provision for local authorities, announced in his autumn statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 17 November 1983, c.509]: The economic background is set out in the autumn statement.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what is the change in percentage terms in local authority public expenditure 1983–84 provision over 1982–83 outturn, in: (a) cash, (b) cost and (c) volume terms.
[pursuant to his reply, 17 November 1983, c. 509]: Provision for local authority RSG-relevant current expenditure in 1983–84 represents a 3¼ per cent. increase in cash over 1982–83 estimated outturn, after taking account of the reduction in National Insurance Surcharge payments between the two years. Using the GDP deflator this represents a cost terms reduction of just under 2 per cent. Provision is no longer made in volume terms.
Prime Minister
Ministerial Engagements
asked the Prime Minister how many Ministers who are hon. Members cancelled, curtailed or postponed official engagements on Friday 18 November; and if she will list them.
I have been asked to reply.The engagements undertaken by Ministers on 18 November would have taken account of the expectation that members of the Government would support the Government's view of the business that came before the House on that day.
Education And Science
Clinical Students
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he is satisfied with the current rate of the supplementary grant paid to clinical students; and whether he will increase the level of the grant to take account of the lower amount of rent and rate rebate they receive compared with other students as a result of their higher annual income.
My right hon. Friend is well aware of the particular problems faced by clinical students and will keep their needs in mind when deciding the level of the supplementary grant in the academic year 1984–85, in the light of the resources available. The student grant provides an average amount in respect of board and lodging to all students: a student's entitlement to housing benefit depends upon the total resources available to him, including his grant, and will vary according to individual circumstances.
Student Awards
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will introduce regulations to ensure that no local education authority shall implement a decision to terminate an award, or withhold payment due under an award, made in pursuance of the power accorded by regulation 16 of the Education (Mandatory Awards) Regulations 1983 before the authority has given the student concerned the opportunity to submit orally or in writing at the option of the student reasons why the decision should not be implemented.
No. It is in the nature of the provisions of regulation 16 that a student will always have an opportunity to say why he thinks his award should not be reduced or terminated.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will introduce regulations to ensure that a student adversely affected by a decision of a local education authority to terminate an award or withhold payment under an award made in pursuance of the power accorded by regulation 16 of the Education (Mandatory Awards) Regulations 1983 shall have a simple and inexpensive means of making an appeal against that decision.
No. It is already open to a student to ask the local education authority concerned to review its decision, to ask the Commissioner for Local Administration to intervene if he thinks there has been maladministration and to ask my right hon. Friend to intervene if he thinks the authority has acted unreasonably.
Universities (Clinical Salaries)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what provision has been made to enable universities to maintain the 1968 agreement and grant clincial academic salary increases in line with the increases given to National Health Service hospital doctors.
Recurrent grant to the universities for the academic years 1983–84 and 1984–85 provides a contribution to the extra cost of the pay settlement for university clinical staff, following the increases agreed for NHS doctors and dentists after the 13th report of the Review Body for Doctors and Dentists Pay.
Universities (Funding)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what consideration the Government have given to the level of funding for the universities in the next five years; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 22 November 1983, c.58]: The following figures of recurrent grant are given in financial years as the grant for the academic year 1986–87 depends partly on the next public expenditure survey:
| £ million | |
| 1984–85 | 1,249 |
| 1985–86 | 1,289 |
| 1986–87 | 1,320 |
Transport
Highway Budget
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he is satisfied that his Department's highway budget will be fully utilised in the current year in accordance with present plans; and if he will make a statement.
Yes. Progress in 1983–84 has been excellent. Thanks to the good summer and acceleration of work, some eight major schemes are likely to be completed this year instead of next, as planned, and a further nine schemes due for completion in 1984–85 are ahead of schedule.
British Transport Police
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if the British Transport police are subject to the police complaints procedure.
Yes.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport under what arrangements the British Transport polices are issued with guns.
A procedure exists under which a small number of British Transport police officers who have been trained by the Metropolitan police and who hold firearms certificates can, in strictly controlled and very limited circumstances, be issued with guns from the Metropolitan police armoury on the authority of a senior officer of the Metropolitan police.
Severn Bridge
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if his Department has entered into any negotiations with British Rail regarding contingency planning in respect of the Severn bridge to utilise the Severn tunnel to convey heavy lorries from a railhead near Bristol parkway and unloading at Severn tunnel junction.
No, although in 1982, my Department consulted British Rail about the potential rail capacity if customers chose to direct more of their traffic to rail. Special rolling stock would be needed to convey heavy lorries through the tunnel.
Disabled Persons (Dial-A-Ride)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will ensure that the London dial-a-ride for disabled people unable to us London Transport will continue to be funded if the Greater London council is abolished.
I am very conscious of the special transport needs of disabled people in London. I shall be giving special consideration, after consultation with representatives of disabled people, to how those needs can most effectively be met in the future.
Wales
Radioactive Waste
asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many sites in Wales are licensed for the disposal of radioactive wastes; what is the exact location of each of these sites; who owns them; when their current licences are due for renewal; and whether any of the sites that have been licensed are as yet unused.
There are no sites in Wales licensed for the disposal of radioactive wastes. Authorisations for the disposal of radioactive waste issued by the Welsh Office under the Radioactive Substances Act 1960 relate only to the disposal of those wastes from specified premises. Authorisation under the Radioactive Substances Act 1960 are not given unless the Radiochemical inspectorate is fully satisfied that the proposed method of disposal is safe and appropriate for the wastes in question.
Language Courses
asked the Secretary of State for Wales whether he is satisfied with the provision and results of Welsh and foreign language teaching in Welsh secondary schools.
There is always room for improvement and the need to develop provision further in these areas was a theme of both the guidance document "Welsh in Schools" and the consultation document "Foreign Languages in the Schools Curriculum". The forthcoming circular on the school curriculum will ask local education authorities to review and report on policies developed in recent years.
Trade And Industry
Trade Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether the indices for unit values and volume in the annual supplement to the Monthly Review of External Trade Statistics are arithmetically linked in cases where there has been a change in the base year or whether the early years have been recalculated on the most recent weights.
The 1975 based series of unit value and volume index numbers contained in the 1983 annual supplement were calculated using the 1975 weights from 1973 onwards. Figures for earlier years were obtained by simple resealing.The 1980 base series currently in use were calculated using 1980 weights from 1978 onwards, figures prior to 1978 being the resealed 1975 series. Historic data on this basis will be published in the 1984 annual supplement in the spring of 1984. For base changes prior to 1975 the index numbers were normally recalculated only from the base year onwards.
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether he will publish in the Official Report a table bringing up to date the figures shown in tables F2 and F5 of the January 1978 issue of the Monthly Review of External Trade Statistics.
Figures for the SITC(R) headings used in the January 1978 edition of the Monthly Review of External Trade Statistics are no longer compiled. Comparable figures based on SITC(R2) have been appended as tables D4–D7 to the unpublished index
| Main Manufacturing Countries Exports: Individual Percentage Shares | ||||||||||||
| Year | Total US$ million | United Kingdom | Federal Republic of Germany | Belgium/Luxembourg | France | Italy | Netherlands | Sweden | Switzerland | United States of America | Canada | Japan |
| SITC 5: Chemicals and Related Products | ||||||||||||
| 1976 | 56,259 | 9·7 | 22·3 | 7·2 | 10·8 | 5·1 | 10·7 | 1·6 | 5·7 | 17·7 | 2·6 | 6·7 |
| 1977 | 63,592 | 10·6 | 22·4 | 7·3 | 11·3 | 5·0 | 9·9 | 1·5 | 5·6 | 17·0 | 2·7 | 6·8 |
| 1978 | 77,109 | 10·5 | 21·8 | 7·4 | 11·5 | 4·8 | 9·6 | 1·5 | 6·2 | 17·5 | 2·7 | 6·5 |
| 1979 | 101,506 | 10·3 | 22·1 | 6·5 | 11·5 | 5·7 | 10·2 | 1·4 | 5·3 | 18·2 | 2·9 | 5·9 |
| 1980 | 113,983 | 10·8 | 21·3 | 6·5 | 11·6 | 4·8 | 9·9 | 1·4 | 5·0 | 19·7 | 3·1 | 5·8 |
| 1981 | 107,795 | 10·0 | 20·4 | 6·0 | 11·3 | 4·8 | 9·7 | 1·4 | 5·1 | 21·3 | 3·7 | 6·2 |
| 1982* | 100,951 | 10·6 | 21·0 | 6·1 | 11·6 | 4·6 | 9·9 | 1·5 | 5·4 | 19·7 | 3·4 | 6·2 |
| SITC 6: Manufactured Goods by Material | ||||||||||||
| 1976 | 112,307 | 9·3 | 18·5 | 10·2 | 10·1 | 7·5 | 5·4 | 4·1 | 2·5 | 10·0 | 5·8 | 16·8 |
| 1977 | 126,720 | 10·3 | 18·1 | 10·1 | 10·5 | 8·3 | 5·1 | 4·0 | 2·8 | 8·9 | 5·7 | 16·3 |
| 1978 | 153,822 | 10·6 | 18·6 | 10·3 | 10·4 | 9·0 | 5·2 | 3·9 | 3·1 | 8·2 | 5·6 | 15·1 |
| 1979 | 186,763 | 10·8 | 18·7 | 10·3 | 10·9 | 9·1 | 4·9 | 4·1 | 3·1 | 8·9 | 5·2 | 14·0 |
| 1980 | 218,295 | 10·9 | 18·0 | 10·1 | 10·9 | 8·5 | 4·6 | 3·9 | 3·1 | 10·3 | 5·5 | 14·3 |
| 1981 | 194,421 | 7·7 | 17·5 | 9·1 | 10·7 | 9·3 | 4·5 | 3·9 | 2·7 | 10·9 | 6·3 | 17·3 |
| 1982* | 177,718 | 7·8 | 18·6 | 8·9 | 10·4 | 9·5 | 4·7 | 3·9 | 2·7 | 9·7 | 6·2 | 17·5 |
| SITC 7: Machinery and Transport Equipment | ||||||||||||
| 1976 | 226,747 | 8·0 | 21·4 | 3·6 | 9·2 | 5·6 | 3·4 | 3·6 | 2·2 | 21·8 | 5·3 | 15·8 |
| 1977 | 257,761 | 8·4 | 21·9 | 3·5 | 9·2 | 5·9 | 3·2 | 3·3 | 2·2 | 19·8 | 5·2 | 17·4 |
| 1978 | 307,895 | 8·6 | 21·6 | 3·5 | 8·1 | 6·0 | 3·0 | 3·0 | 2·5 | 19·0 | 5·0 | 18·9 |
| 1979 | 353,344 | 8·9 | 21·8 | 3·7 | 9·9 | 6·2 | 3·1 | 3·2 | 2·4 | 19·6 | 4·6 | 16·5 |
| 1980 | 410,642 | 9·6 | 20·8 | 3·4 | 9·0 | 6·1 | 3·1 | 3·0 | 2·3 | 20·2 | 4·1 | 18·5 |
| 1981 | 419,828 | 7·8 | 18·7 | 2·9 | 8·0 | 5·8 | 2·6 | 2·8 | 2·0 | 22·3 | 4·7 | 22·3 |
| 1982* | 404,366 | 7·8 | 20·4 | 2·9 | 7·8 | 5·6 | 2·7 | 2·8 | 2·1 | 21·5 | 5·4 | 21·1 |
number supplement to the 1983 annual supplement, a copy of which has been placed in the House of Commons Library.
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the United Kingdom share of world trade by volume in 1953, 1963, 1973 and each year from 1973 and his estimate of the United Kingdom share in each quarter of the current year.
Data for 1953 and 1963 are not readily available. The shares from 1973, based on 1980 prices, are as follows:
| United Kingdom snare of MMC* Exports of Manufactures at 1980 Prices | |
| Percentages | |
| 1973 | 11·7 |
| 1974 | 11·2 |
| 1975 | 11·4 |
| 1976 | 11·0 |
| 1977 | 11·1 |
| 1978 | 10·4 |
| 1979 | 9·9 |
| 1980 | 9·7 |
| 1981 | 8·8 |
| 1982 | 9·1 |
| 1983 Q1 | 8·7 |
| 1983 Q2 | 8·4 |
| * Main Manfacturing Countries. | |
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether he will publish in the Official Report a table bringing up to date for 1976 and subsequent years and the latest quarter for which figures are available the information given in tables C20 to C26 of the January 1978 issue of the Monthly Review of External Trade Statistics.
This information is no longer available quarterly. Because of the revision of the standard international trade classification it is not possible to provide a consistent breakdown of section 7 throughout the period. The annual information is as follows:
Year
| Total US$ million
| United Kingdom
| Federal Republic of Germany
| Belgium/ Luxembourg
| France
| Italy
| Netherlands
| Sweden
| Switzerland
| United States of America
| Canada
| Japan
|
SITC 8: Miscellaneous Manufactured Articles
| ||||||||||||
| 1976 | 47,216 | 9·1 | 18·9 | 5·3 | 9·8 | 15·1 | 5·5 | 2£·4 | 5·7 | 14·0 | 1·5 | 12·8 |
| 1977 | 56,935 | 9·5 | 18·8 | 5·0 | 9·7 | 16·0 | 4·9 | 2·1 | 5·8 | 13·0 | 1·2 | 14·1 |
| 1978 | 70,735 | 9·7 | 18·9 | 4·6 | 9·9 | 16·9 | 4·5 | 2·1 | 6·9 | 14·1 | 1·4 | 11·0 |
| 1979 | 86,164 | 9·8 | 18·6 | 4·4 | 10·1 | 18·8 | 4·5 | 2·1 | 6·1 | 14·4 | 1·5 | 9·7 |
| 1980 | 101,101 | 10·4 | 17·8 | 4·4 | 10·0 | 16·5 | 4·3 | 2·1 | 6·0 | 16·1 | 1·6 | 10·7 |
| 1981 | 96,823 | 9·8 | 16·5 | 4·0 | 9·2 | 16·4 | 4·0 | 2·0 | 6·2 | 17·0 | 1·8 | 13·0 |
| 1982* | 93,685 | 9·6 | 17·1 | 3·9 | 8·9 | 17·4 | 4·2 | 1·9 | 5·9 | 16·7 | 1·9 | 12·4 |
SITC (Rev 1) 71: Machinery other than Electric
| ||||||||||||
| 1976 | 89,410 | 10·2 | 24·9 | 2·6 | 8·8 | 6·8 | 2·9 | 3·4 | 3·8 | 24·6 | 3·4 | 8·6 |
| 1977 | 100,320 | 10·6 | 25·3 | 2·6 | 8·7 | 7·4 | 2·9 | 3·2 | 3·8 | 22·2 | 3·4 | 10·1 |
SITC (Rev I) 72: Electrical Machinery
| ||||||||||||
| 1976 | 47,088 | 7·6 | 20·0 | 3·5 | 8·5 | 5·5 | 6·1 | 3·8 | 3·0 | 19·7 | 1·8 | 20·5 |
| 1977 | 54,205 | 8·1 | 20·4 | 3·3 | 8·4 | 5·8 | 6·2 | 3·4 | 3·2 | 19·0 | 1·5 | 20·8 |
SITC (Rev I) 73: Transport Equipment
| ||||||||||||
| 1976 | 90,249 | 6·1 | 18·7 | 4·6 | 10·0 | 4·5 | 2·5 | 3·7 | 0·2 | 20·2 | 9·0 | 20·5 |
| 1977 | 103,236 | 6·3 | 19·5 | 4·5 | 10·1 | 4·6 | 1·9 | 3·2 | 0·2 | 17·9 | 9·0 | 22·7 |
SITC (Rev 2) 71: Power Generating Machinery
| ||||||||||||
| 1978 | 24,165 | 14·0 | 20·3 | 1·5 | 8·9 | 4·5 | 2·0 | 2·4 | 2·8 | 24·1 | 6·0 | 13·3 |
| 1979 | 26,702 | 14·2 | 200 | 1·9 | 9·7 | 4·2 | 2·1 | 2·7 | 3·0 | 26·1 | 5·2 | 10·9 |
| 1980 | 30,719 | 16·9 | 17·3 | 2·0 | 8·8 | 4·8 | 2·1 | 2·5 | 2·8 | 27·8 | 3·8 | 11·3 |
| 1981 | 32,362 | 15·9 | 14·4 | 2·1 | 8·2 | 4·7 | 1·7 | 2·4 | 2·2 | 29·6 | 5·0 | 13·8 |
| 1982 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
SITC (Rev. 2) 72: Machinery for Specialised Industry
| ||||||||||||
| 1978 | 39,769 | 10·5 | 26·5 | 3·7 | 7·8 | 8·2 | 2·6 | 2·8 | 5·3 | 20·4 | 2·9 | 9·3 |
| 1979 | 46,614 | 10·6 | 25·9 | 3·6 | 7·6 | 8·6 | 2·6 | 3·0 | 4·9 | 21·2 | 3·2 | 9·0 |
| 1980 | 53,639 | 11·2 | 23·0 | 3·2 | 7·4 | 8·7 | 2·5 | 2·9 | 5·1 | 23·4 | 3·2 | 9·5 |
| 1981 | 53,900 | 9·3 | 20·4 | 2·6 | 6·6 | 8·3 | 2·3 | 2·7 | 4·7 | 28·5 | 3·7 | 11·0 |
| 1982 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
SITC (Rev. 2) 73: Metalworking Machinery
| ||||||||||||
| 1978 | 9,734 | 7·6 | 33·5 | 2·2 | 6·6 | 8·6 | 1·4 | 2·7 | 9·7 | 12·4 | 1·1 | 14·3 |
| 1979 | 11,522 | 7·1 | 33·0 | 2·1 | 7·2 | 8·5 | 1·5 | 2·8 | 9·8 | 12·3 | 1·5 | 14·4 |
| 1980 | 11,311 | 8·5 | 30·3 | 2·1 | 6·8 | 9·4 | 1·6 | 2·7 | 9·8 | 13·5 | 1·4 | 14·0 |
| 1981 | 12,954 | 7·7 | 26·8 | 1·9 | 5·6 | 9·5 | 1·4 | 2·6 | 8·4 | 16·9 | 1·6 | 17·7 |
| 1982 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
SITC (Rev. 2) 74: General Industrial Machinery
| ||||||||||||
| 1978 | 39,533 | 8·9 | 25·0 | 2·5 | 10·0 | 8·2 | 3·3 | 4·0 | 3·9 | 19·3 | 1·7 | 13·1 |
| 1979 | 45,014 | 9·3 | 24·9 | 2·3 | 10·2 | 9·0 | 3·4 | 4·3 | 3·6 | 19·5 | 1·9 | 11·6 |
| 1980 | 53,566 | 10·1 | 24·0 | 2·2 | 9·6 | 9·3 | 3·3 | 4·4 | 3·4 | 20·0 | 1·7 | 12·1 |
| 1981 | 52,134 | 8·6 | 21·5 | 1·9 | 8·7 | 9·1 | 3·0 | 4·2 | 3·1 | 21·2 | 1·9 | 16·9 |
| 1982 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
SITC (Rev 2) 75: Office Machines, ADP Equipment
| ||||||||||||
| 1978 | 15,814 | 11·2 | 14·7 | 1·4 | 8·2 | 4·9 | 5·4 | 2·8 | 1·5 | 31·5 | 3·2 | 15·3 |
| 1979 | 20,005 | 12·4 | 14·1 | 1·3 | 8·3 | 5·3 | 5·4 | 2·9 | 1·1 | 32·1 | 3·5 | 13·6 |
| 1980 | 25,483 | 12·3 | 13·2 | 1·3 | 7·4 | 6·9 | 4·5 | 2·8 | 1·0 | 33·9 | 3·1 | 13·5 |
| 1981 | 25,909 | 9·7 | 12·2 | 1·2 | 7·1 | 4·5 | 4·2 | 2·2 | 0·9 | 37·6 | 3·6 | 16·7 |
| 1982 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
SITC (Rev. 2) 76: Telecommunications and Reproducing Equipment
| ||||||||||||
| 1978 | 21,841 | 6·5 | 14·4 | 4·7 | 4·4 | 3·2 | 6·5 | 4·1 | 1·5 | 12·3 | 2·0 | 40·6 |
| 1979 | 24,059 | 6·5 | 14·6 | 4·6 | 5·1 | 3·3 | 6·4 | 4·4 | 1·6 | 12·3 | 2·5 | 38·8 |
| 1980 | 28,655 | 5·8 | 13·5 | 4·7 | 4·7 | 3·0 | 5·9 | 3·9 | 1·3 | 12·0 | 2·6 | 42·7 |
| 1981 | 31,542 | 5·1 | 10·8 | 3·5 | 3·7 | 2·3 | 3·9 | 3·3 | 1·3 | 12·2 | 2·9 | 51·0 |
| 1982 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
SITC (Rev. 2) 77: Electrical Machinery
| ||||||||||||
| 1978 | 35,913 | 7·5 | 25·3 | 3·1 | 10·2 | 7·2 | 6·0 | 2·4 | 4·1 | 16·6 | 1·0 | 16·6 |
| 1979 | 42,052 | 7·4 | 24·0 | 3·2 | 11·1 | 7·5 | 6·1 | 2·5 | 3·9 | 17·2 | 1·2 | 15·9 |
| 1980 | 48,473 | 8·6 | 22·2 | 2·9 | 10·5 | 6·6 | 5·6 | 2·4 | 3·7 | 17·7 | 1·3 | 18·5 |
| 1981 | 47,574 | 7·2 | 19·4 | 2·5 | 9·4 | 7·2 | 5·0 | 2·3 | 3·4 | 19·9 | 1·6 | 22·3 |
| 1982 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
SITC (Rev. 2)78: Road Vehicles
| ||||||||||||
| 1978 | 94,242 | 6·3 | 22·0 | 5·8 | 10·5 | 5·4 | 1·2 | 2·8 | 0·2 | 14·1 | 10·6 | 21·2 |
| 1979 | 108,564 | 6·2 | 23·4 | 6·1 | 11·4 | 5·6 | 1·4 | 3·2 | 0·2 | 13·9 | 8·9 | 19·9 |
| 1980 | 119,102 | 6·2 | 22·9 | 5·5 | 10·9 | 5·2 | 1·4 | 3·0 | 0·2 | 12·2 | 7·7 | 24·7 |
| 1981 | 120,278 | 51 | 21·6 | 4·9 | 9·1 | 4·4 | 1·2 | 30 | 0·2 | 13·4 | 9·1 | 280 |
| 1982 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
SITC (Rev. 2) 79: Other Transport Equipment
| ||||||||||||
| 1978 | 26,884 | 10·5 | 9·8 | 0·5 | 6·7 | 2·9 | 3·0 | 3·3 | 0·4 | 32·8 | 2·4 | 27·6 |
| 1979 | 28,812 | 13·3 | 9·4 | 0·7 | 12·7 | 2·7 | 3·3 | 2·8 | 0·6 | 36·4 | 3·8 | 14·3 |
| 1980 | 35,955 | 15·4 | 10·6 | 1·3 | 7·8 | 2·2 | 3·8 | 1·6 | 0·5 | 39·0 | 4·0 | 13·9 |
| 1981 | 41,470 | 8·1 | 11·7 | 0·9 | 8·8 | 3·8 | 3·2 | 1·9 | 0·5 | 39·4 | 3·2 | 18·3 |
| 1982 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | D.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Note: As a result of changes in the compilation of United Kingdom statistics in respect of aircraft in 1981, there is a discontinuity in Division 79 with earlier years.
1. 1976 and 1977 are on Rev 1. Later years Rev 2.
2. As a result of changes in the compilation of United Kingdom statistics in respect of aircraft and diamonds in 1981, there is a discontinuity in Sections 6 and 7 with earlier years.
* estimated figures.
Source: OECD; Eurostat.
Tokyo Round
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether he monitors the effect on imports of reductions in tariffs agreed under the Tokyo round.
The White Paper "General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, The Multilateral Negotiations 1973–1979"—Cmnd. 7724 of 1979—estimated that the average trade weighted external tariff of the European Community would fall from 9·8 per cent. to 7·5 per cent. over the period of the Tokyo round. The trade weighting was carried out using 1976 trade volumes as a basis. No detailed monitoring has been carried out because of the difficulties of isolating the effects of the Tokyo round tariff reductions from the many other influences on trade patterns and volumes since then.
Tin Plate
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will publish in the Official Report the details of quota systems within the countries of the European Community for the production of tin plate.
The production of tin plate is not subject to the ECSC article 58 quota regime.
Alvey Directorate
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether he will take steps to ensure that the Alvey directorate includes a representative of the small firms sector.
The Alvey directorate includes many individuals on secondment from industry, largely at the expense of their firms, but they have been appointed for their particular expertise rather than as representatives of different sectors of industry. Individual small firms are already involved in the preparation of the detailed strategies and in a number of studies carried out on behalf of the directorate.
Council Of Ministers
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement on the outcome of the Council of Ministers meeting on the internal market which took place on Friday 25 November.
The meeting of the Council on 25 November, which I attended, made useful progress. Discussion concentrated on the outstanding priority areas identified by the two previous European Councils: the reduction of frontier formalities, agreement on a series of article 100 directives, which have been held up over the question of Community certification of products of third country origin, and the proposed new common commercial policy regulation.The Council agreed the frontier facilitation directive and adopted the temporary use regulation. The former will improve co-ordination between customs posts at adjacent frontiers and includes a number of other measures to reduce waiting times for goods vehicles at intra-Community frontiers. The latter will enable professional effects and, in certain circumstances, exhibition goods, to be imported temporarily into another member state without payment of taxes and without requiring any form of financial guarantee.In the context of the proposals for a single administrative document for customs formalities, agreement was reached on the amount of information that could be required in intra-Community trade. I also pressed for an early timetable for the adoption of a document which would bring practical benefits to business by reducing the amount of paperwork needed to conduct trade within the Community.Agreement in principle was reached on 15 of the article 100 directives hitherto blocked by the question of Community certification of products from third countries. The fifteen concerned are proposals for directives relating to seamless steel gas cylinders; seamless aluminium alloy gas cylinders; welded unalloyed steel gas cylinders; non-electric appliances for heating, cooking and hot water production; appliances using gaseous fuels for the instantaneous production of hot water; for the common provisions for lifting and mechanical handling appliances; electrically operated lifts; for the common provisions for construction plant and equipment; permissible sound levels for pneumatic concrete-breakers and picks, for current generators for welding; for current generators for power supply; for compressors; for tower cranes; and for lawn mowers; and to a directive relating to electro-medical equipment used in human or veterinary medicine.Adoption of these directives will need to proceed in parallel with agreement on the proposed common commercial policy regulation on which the Council had a brief exchange of views and on which decisions will have to be taken in due course.A large majority of member states were able to agree on a series of proposals for improving European standards making to facilitate trade within the Community. I hope that the outstanding issues on these proposals can be resolved quickly.I made clear the United Kingdom's concern that there should be progress in liberalising trade in services as well as making progress in parallel towards completely free trade in goods. Free trade in services such as insurance and air transport is an essential part of the completion of the Community's internal market.I hope and expect that further meetings of the Council on internal market matters will be held in the new year under the French Presidency of the Community, to resolve the outstanding issues and to carry forward work where the recent meetings of the Council have suggested fresh initiatives. I believe it to be essential that further progress be made within a reasonable time.
European Community (Steel Ministers)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement on the Council of European Community steel Ministers held in Brussels on 29 November.
The Council which my hon. Friend the Minister of State for Industry and I attended, reaffirmed its commitment to restructuring the European steel industry. It also recognised the need for further action to restore price stability on the European steel market. It agreed that officials should examine the Commission's proposals on mandatory minimum prices and monitoring of the market, in preparation for a further Council meeting on 14 December. I made it clear that there could be no lasting solution to the problems of the EC steel industry while excess European capacity persisted.The Council also agreed on a more rigorous mandate for the Commission to negotiate voluntary restraint arrangements with the EC's main steel supplying countries in 1984. It also agreed that the Commission should make a further effort to obtain adequate compensation in GATT for the United States measures on special steels, and to secure improvements to meet the concerns of EC exporters. The Council agreed that, if there is no satisfactory conclusion to these negotiations by 15 January 1984, the EC should take retaliatory action in GATT.
Consumer Credit Advertisements And Quotations Regulations
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry when he plans to lay regulations amending from £30 to £50 the monetary amounts in the consumer credit advertisements and quotations regulations.
I have today laid the following statutory instrument:SI 1983/1721 Consumer Credit (Advertisements and Quotations) (Amendments No. 2) Regulations 1983.
Northern Ireland
Radioactive Waste
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many sites in Northern Ireland have been licensed for the disposal of radioactive wastes; what is the exact location of each site; who owns them; when the current licences are due for renewal; and whether any of the sites that have been licensed are as yet unused.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
Londonderry (Further Education)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement about the report of the Cowan review group which has been considering the needs of advanced further education in Londonderry.
The report is being published today and copies have been placed in the Library. The main recommendation is that, for an initial period of five years, there should be joint provision of courses by the North West college of technology and the proposed University of Ulster.I will give the report urgent consideration and I am consulting the Western Education and Library Board and the steering group planning the merger of the New University of Ulster and the Ulster polytechnic.
Electricity Service (Efficiency Audit)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he has considered the report of the efficiency audit of the Northern Ireland Electricity Service's activity commissioned by him and carried out by Beecom Management Consultants Ltd.; and if he will make a statement.
The report of the consultants was published on 22 September and copies were placed in the Library. The consultants' overall conclusion was that NIES' s activities were generally organised and performed effectively and economically within existing constraints. The report also contains a number of recommendations aimed at further improvement of the service's performance. The Northern Ireland Department of Ecomomic Development and NIES are together following up these recommendations with a view to agreeing medium-term strategic objectives for the service.
Non-Governmental Bodies (Payments)
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will list the statutory powers under which he is authorised to make payments of any kind to non-Government bodies, including individuals, the total amount paid under each such statutory power in 1982–83 and the number of staff involved in making such payments.
[pursuant to the reply, 24 November 1983, c. 317]: The information as requested is not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. However, the following information is available in respect of non-statutory bodies.
| Statutory power | Amount paid in 1982–83 |
| £ | |
| Housing (NI) Order 1981 | 29,155,157 |
| Housing and Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (NI) 1946 | 120,854 |
| Housing (NI) Order 1983 | none |
| Road Traffic (NI) Order 1981 | 85,095 |
| Wild Birds Protection Acts (NI) 1931–68 | 27,652 |
| The Amenity Lands Act (NI) 1966 | 61,208 |
| Social Need (Grants) Act (NI) 1970 | none |
| Recreation and Youth Service (NI) Order 1973 | 1,122,873 |
| Recreation and Youth Service (NI) Order 1973 as amended by the Recreation (NI) Order 1975 | 827,589 |
| Community Relations (Amendment) (NI) Order 1975 | 152,072 |
| Education and Libraries (NI) Order 1972 and the Education and Library Services, etc., Grants Regulations (NI) 1973 | 3,310,698 |
| Agriculture Act (NI) 1949 | 205,902 |
| Seed Potato (Improvement) Scheme (NI) 1982 | 133,000 |
| Health and Personal Social Services (NI) Order 1972 | 1,439,700 |
| Children and Young Persons Act (NI) 1968 | 315,559 |
| Employment and Training Act (NI) 1950 | 15,772,013 |
| Health and Safety at Work (NI) Order 1978 | 4,322 |
| Industrial Relations (NI) Order 1976 | 35,000 |
| Disabled Persons (Employment) Act (NI) 1945 | 390,900 |
| Industrial Development (NI) Order 1982 | 50,405 |
| Appropriation (NI) Order 1982 and the Appropriation (No. 2) (NI) Order 1982 | 907,482 |
| Children and Young Persons Act (NI) 1968 and the Probation Act (NI) 1950 | 298,007 |
Environment
Urban Programmes
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many projects to date are covered by urban development grants; how much public expenditure is involved in the current financial year; and how much is committed thereby in future years.
My Department has so far given final approval to 52 projects for urban development grant. A further 58 projects have received offers of grant to which responses from local authorities remain outstanding. The estimated total costs of these 110 projects are more than £300 million, of which some £63 million would be met by urban development grant and other public funds, spread over several years. Eleven other projects have received offers of grant but will not now be proceeding.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will provide a detailed breakdown of the total urban programme for the financial years 1978–79 to 1983–84—estimated;(2) if he will list the outturn urban programme grants paid to each partnership and programme authority and designated district since 1979–80, the estimated figure for 1983–84, and the total grant paid to all English local authorities in these years.
| Table 1 | ||||||
| Breakdown of the urban programme 1978–79 to 1983–84 | ||||||
| £ million cash | ||||||
| 1978–79 | 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84* | |
| Partnerships | 37 | 100 | 116 | 118 | 137 | 134 |
| Programme authorities | 56 | 32 | 44 | 49 | 59 | 73 |
| Traditional urban programme | 30 | 33 | 42 | 47 | 52 | |
| Other designated districts | 3 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | |
| Urban development grant | — | — | — | — | — | 60 |
| Additional allocations | — | 10 | 4 | — | 19 | 23 |
| 93 | 165 | 202 | 215 | 270 | 348 | |
| * Provisional. | ||||||
| Table 2 | ||||||
| Urban programme resources (England) 1979–80/1983–84 | ||||||
| Allocation in £ million, cash | ||||||
| 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 (Provisional) | Total 1979–80/1983–84 | |
| Partnerships (1) | ||||||
| Birmingham | 13·2 | 17·3 | 16·9 | 25·6 | 24·1 | 97·1 |
| Docklands* | 20·5 | 26·2 | 28·3 | 17·0 | 8·0 | 100·0 |
| Hackney | 11·8 | 15·4 | 15·0 | 12·1 | 11·0 | 84·3 |
| Islington | 9·7 | 10·4 | ||||
| Lambeth | 6·8 | 9·0 | 9·2 | 10·4 | 13·5 | 48·9 |
| Liverpool* | 12·6 | 17·6 | 17·4 | 24·8 | 24·1 | 96·5 |
| Manchester/Salford | 13·0 | 17·5 | 16·8 | 23·6 | 24·5 | 95·4 |
| Newcastle/Gateshead | 9·1 | 12·9 | 14·0 | 19·8 | 18·0 | 73·8 |
| Programme Authorities (1) (2) (3) | ||||||
| Blackburn† | — | 0·34 | 0·54 | 0·78 | 1·09 | 2·75 |
| Bolton | 1·66 | 2·11 | 2·56 | 2·99 | 3·39 | 12·71 |
| Bradford | 2·63 | 3·33 | 3·12 | 5·97 | 4·18 | 19·23 |
| Brent† | — | 0·35 | 0·65 | 1·55 | 1·58 | 4·13 |
| Coventry‡ | — | 0·14 | 0·21 | 0·85 | 1·18 | 2·38 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 2·63 | 3·33 | 4·27 | 4·78 | 5·63 | 20·64 |
| Hull | 2·06 | 2·62 | 3·40 | 3·89 | 4·47 | 16·44 |
| Knowsley‡ | — | 0·15 | 0·47 | 0·37 | 1·00 | 2·79 |
| Leeds | 2·70 | 3·56 | 3·75 | 4·63 | 4·14 | 18·78 |
| Leicester | 2·78 | 3·83 | 4·16 | 5·77 | 5·43 | 21·97 |
| Middlesbrough | 2·06 | 2·71 | 3·43 | 4·98 | 4·62 | 17·80 |
| Nottingham | 2·62 | 3·41 | 3·75 | 4·98 | 4·85 | 19·61 |
| Oldham | 1·78 | 2·43 | 2·85 | 4·36 | 3·66 | 15·08 |
| Rochdale† | — | 0·55 | 0·93 | 1·46 | 2·40 | 5·34 |
| Sandwell† | — | 0·83 | 0·98 | 2·81 | 2·34 | 6·96 |
| Sheffield | 2·65 | 3·44 | 3·49 | 4·86 | 4·01 | 18·45 |
| Sunderland | 1·77 | 2·60 | 2·68 | 2·95 | 3·17 | 13·17 |
| Tower Hamlets║ | — | 0·35 | 0·32 | 0·51 | 1·78 | 2·96 |
| North Tyneside | 1·57 | 2·25 | 2·34 | 3·07 | 3·39 | 12·62 |
| South Tyneside | 1·90 | 2·51 | 2·99 | 4·82 | 3·93 | 16·15 |
| Wandsworth† | — | 0·48 | 0·50 | 1·10 | 1·60 | 3·68 |
| Wirral | 2·07 | 2·67 | 2·79 | 4·42 | 4·47 | 15·62 |
| Wolverhampton | 1·76 | 2·93 | 3·22 | 5·52 | 4·44 | 17·87 |
A detailed breakdown of the total urban programme by cash allocations for the years 1978–79 to 1983–84 is shown in table 1. The total amount allocated to local authorities in this period is £1,293 million.The urban programme resources allocated to partnership and programme authorities and other districts designated under the Inner Urban Areas Act 1978 for the years 1979–80 to 1983–84 are listed in table 2. Outturn figures are shown where available for 1982–83 and earlier years. Grant is paid in arrears on 75 per cent. of the cost of approved projects, or on loan charges where projects are financed by borrowing.
1980–81
| 1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84 (Provisional)
| Total 1980–81/1983–84
| |
| Other Designated Districts (1) (2) (3) | |||||
| Barnsley | 0·40 | 0·50 | 1·29 | 0·88 | 3·07 |
| Burnley‡ | 0·04 | 0·01 | 0·28 | 0·08 | 0·41 |
| Doncaster | 0·32 | 0·35 | 0·82 | 0·43 | 1·92 |
| Ealing | 0·25 | 0·35 | 0·90 | 0·71 | 2·21 |
| Greenwich║ | 0·20 | 0·14 | 0·35 | 0·55 | 1·24 |
| Haringey | 0·29 | 0·76 | 1·44 | 0·87 | 3·36 |
| Hartlepool | 0·57 | 0·65 | 1·14 | 0·86 | 3·22 |
| Langbaurgh‡ | — | — | 0·02 | 0·25 | 0·27 |
| Lewisham║ | 0·24 | 0·42 | 0·40 | 0·65 | 1·71 |
| Newham║ | 0·21 | 0·32 | 0·76 | 0·57 | 1·86 |
| Rotherham | 0·28 | 0·71 | 0·90 | 0·78 | 2·67 |
| Sefton | 0·51 | 0·23 | 0·41 | 0·37 | 1·52 |
| Southwark║ | 0·33 | 0·37 | 0·65 | 0·55 | 1·90 |
| St. Helens | 0·41 | 0·41 | 0·97 | 0·71 | 2·50 |
| Walsall‡ | 0·18 | 0·38 | 1·00 | 0·34 | 1·90 |
| Wigan | 0·62 | 0·60 | 1·17 | 0·66 | 3·05 |
* The figures for London Docklands and Merseyside authorities exclude allocations to the London Docklands and Merseyside Development Corporations; they also exclude other special projects to promote economic regeneration, improve housing and the environment, and develop the tourist potential of Merseyside. | |||||
† Former "Other Designated District" (for years 1979–80 to 1982–83). | |||||
‡ New designation announced on 15 February 1983. | |||||
| ║ Allocations for projects outside the Docklands partnership area in 1980–81 and 1981–82 and outside the LDDC area in 1982–83 and 1983–84. | |||||
Notes:
(1) Figures include urban programmes expenditure by metropolitan counties and in some cases health authorities in those areas.
(2) Figures for other designated districts, newly designated authorities and programme authorities which were formerly other designated districts include allocations under the traditional urban programme for the appropriate years, but exclude urban programme resources received in those years for continuing projects approved under earlier traditional urban programme circulars.
(3) Figures for other designated districts for 1979–80 are not available for individual authority. The total made available to other designated districts for 1979–80, including allocations under the traditional urban programme, is £7·6 million.
"Empty Houses—No Excuses!" (Exhibition)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will arrange for the display of a photographic exhibition in the Upper Waiting Hall on the subject of empty property, entitled "Empty Houses—No Excuses!"
I understand that the necessary arrangements will be made with the authorities of the House as soon as dates for the display can be agreed.
Council House Sales
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he has plans to extend the periods which may be taken into account for right-to-buy qualification and discount purposes to include periods spent in accommodation provided by a police authority.
I draw my hon. Friend's attention to the statement I made in Standing Committee B on 25 October.—[Official Report, c. 249–250.] The Government intend to bring forward amendments to the Housing and Building Control Bill on Report which will allow secure tenants exercising the right to buy to count towards their qualification and discount entitlement periods spent in certain other public sector tenancies. It is our intention to include periods spent in accommodation provided by a police authority.
Radioactive Waste
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many sites in England are licensed for the disposal of radioactive wastes; what is the exact location of each site; when their current licences are due for renewal; whether any sites are as yet unused; and who owns each of the sites.
Authorisations for the disposal of radioactive waste are issued by my Department under the Radioactive Substances Act 1960. They relate solely to the disposal of specified wastes from or on specified premises, and do not constitute a general permission for the use of a particular site for that purpose. Such authorisations are not given unless the Radiochemical Inspectorate of my Department is fully satisfied that the proposed method of disposal is safe and appropriate for the wastes in question.Where the method involved is disposal with ordinary household refuse or controlled burial on a normal landfill site, the authorisation is not given unless the Radiochemical Inspectorate consider that the waste will be safe without continued surveillance and monotoring. Many authorisations relate to a single consignment of waste or are time-limited; otherwise an authorisation remains in force until varied or revoked, whether or not it is used. Because of the nature and low-level of the radioactivity involved, the sites to which authorised disposals are made with householder refuse or by controlled burial are not comprehensively listed.In his statement on 25 October—[Vol. 47, c. 156–57]—my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State said that disposal sites developed by NIREX for solid radioactive wastes from the nuclear industry would in addition be licensed by the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate of the Health and Safety Executive. At present however, pending the making of appropriate regulations, disposal facilities for solid wastes are not in themselves licensable. The site owned and operated by British Nuclear Fuels Ltd. at Drigg in Cumbria is licensed by NII because it is also used for the storage of bulk quantities of radioactive matter.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how often the radiochemical inspectorate inspects licensed sites for the disposal of radioactive wastes; if he will provide details of the results of the latest visits to each of the sites; whether any of the sites registered radiation levels above those cited as safe in the Radioactive Substances Act 1960; and what radiation levels were registered for each site.
Sites used for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste by controlled burial are inspected before an authorisation is given in order to assess their suitability. Subsequent inspections are carried out in order to ensure that the procedures specified in the authorisation have been complied with, and in some cases in order to carry out monitoring as an additional reassurance or precaution. In general, the number of visits is determined by the radiological significance of the disposal.In the case of the sites operated by Cleveland county council and ICI Ltd. at Cowpen Bewley in the hon. Member's constituency, the inspector for the area made routine visits last week and satisfied himself that they are being properly managed.The 1960 Act does not itself specify safe radiation levels, but radiological protection objectives for waste management were published in the annex to the White Paper on radioactive waste mangement—Cmnd. 8607—in July 1982, and are based on the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection as interpretated by the National Radiological Protection Board. In practice, doses to the public from disposal of low-level radioactive solid waste would be, at most, only a very small fraction of the limits stated there. When the inspector visited the Cowpen Bewley sites last week, he found that the surface radiaction level at the county council site is not raised above the natural background level. At the ICI site surface radiation levels result primarily from the presence of naturally radioactive materials which are nevertheless of a sufficiently low level of activity to be exempt from control under the Act.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list al those sites which have in the past been licensed for the disposal of radioactive wastes, giving the dates of their original licensing by his Department and when their licences expired; what facilities and procedures exist for the continued periodical monitoring of these sites for radioactive levels; and if he will list the owners of these sites.
I assume the hon. Member has in mind sites on which controlled burial of radioactive waste has taken place in accordance with authoristation under the Radioactive Substances Act 1960.Because of the form in which the relevant information is held, the comprehensive lists requested are not readily available. Normally long-term monitoring is not necessary because of the low level and relatively short life of the activity involved.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what procedures exist to inspect and monitor the work of the private contractors engaged in the transportation and disposal of radioactive wastes to licensed sites throughout the country; if he will provide a list of all those contractors who are authorised to carry out such work; and if he will further break this list down by source of waste, nature of waste and disposal site concerned.
There is no system of authorisation for contractors. The transport of radioactive materials is subject to general regulations which are the responsibility of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Transport, and the precautions required by those regulations are proportionate to the nature and level of the radioactivity involved. Before an authorisation is given to the relevant waste producer for the disposal of specified wastes, the Radiochemical Inspectorate considers all aspects of the proposed arrangements, including any transport arrangements. Contractors are also subject to the provisions of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. Where that is justifiable, a radiochemical inspector is present while the disposal operation is being carried out, and he may check the site subsequently.
Radiochemical Inspectorate
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will give a breakdown of the manpower and financial resources available to the radiochemical inspectorate; and how these figures have changed annually since the inspectorate was set up.
There are 14 radiochemical inspectors at the moment. Financial resources are made available to cover the costs incurred by the inspectorate for monitoring, travel and purchase of instruments. This cost is expected to be about £324,000 in the current financial year. Comparable figures for the period from 1979–80 are given in table 1. Before 1979–80 records were not kept in a form that allows the costs of manpower of the inspectorate to be separately identified.
| Table 1 | ||
| Number of radiochemical inspectors | Resources | |
| £ | ||
| 1982–83 | 14 | 399,000 |
| 1981–82 | 12 | 270,000 |
| 1980–81 | 9 | 204,000 |
| 1979–80 | 7 | 151,000 |
Urban Programme
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will ensure that a substantially greater part of the traditional urban programme allocation for 1984–85 is allocated to urban areas rather than rural areas.
As in previous years, resources will be allocated following consideration of the individual bids required in the context of the special social need in the urban areas they are designed to serve.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will agree to meet representatives from the voluntary sector in Southwark to discuss future funding under the traditional urban programme.
I have no plans to do so. Officials in my Department have already had a number of meetings with representatives of the voluntary sector in Southwark in recent months in order to help in the working up of suitable projects for urban programme support and to ease the problems of projects which have received approval.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make provision to enable local authorities in inner city areas to provide grants for voluntary and self-help projects which are time-expired under the urban programme and for which his Department decides not to resume direct funding.
No.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will ensure that funding for new and renewed projects under circular 24, under the traditional urban programme, is not at a lower level in real terms than for new projects and renewals under circular 23.
I expect details of the distribution between the different categories of urban programme expenditure to be announced within the next few weeks.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what representations he has received in the last six weeks from organisations and individuals concerned about the Government's proposals on future funding under the urban programme.
The Department has received about 30 letters in similar terms, most of them as a result of the efforts of the Southwark council of voluntary services. They comment on the false speculation in the Financial Times of 19 September that the urban programme was about to be halved.
Housing Starts
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many new housing starts there have been in the London borough of Brent in each of the past five years.
The total numbers of dwellings started in Brent in the five years 1978 to 1982 were 425, 111, 378, 184 and 335, respectively.
Home Department
Parole Policy
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a further statement on his proposals to restrict the release on parole of violent offenders and drug traffickers and on the release of life sentence prisoners.
On 4 August 1975, the right hon. Member for Glasgow, Hillhead (Mr. Jenkins) as Home Secretary, made a statement about the ways in which he proposed to exercise the discretion given him in the Criminal Justice Act 1967 with regard to the release of prisoners on parole. That statement was made after consulting the Parole Board and agreeing with it new guidelines for parole selection.Since then the numbers of prisoners released on parole licence have steadily increased, and in 1982, of all prisoners released from sentences which qualified them for parole consideration, 66·3 per cent. had been granted parole. I do not propose to exercise my discretion in ways which will significantly affect this trend since it accords with my broad strategy for dealing with crime and offenders.I must, however, take account of the general public concern about the increase in violent crime and the growing criticism of the gap between the length of sentences passed and the length of sentences actually served in certain cases. I have therefore decided to use my discretion to ensure that prisoners serving sentences of over five years for offences of violence or drug trafficking will be granted parole only when release under supervision for a few months before the end of a sentence is likely to reduce the long-term risk to the public, or in circumstances which are genuinely exceptional. The offences concerned are those where the Secretary of State may not order the early release of prisoners under section 32 of the Criminal Justice Act 1982 and are set out in schedule 1 to that Act. In 1982 about 240 prisoners sentenced for these offences were recommended for parole before their final review. In future, there will have to be the most compelling reasons before I would agree to parole being granted in such cases.I have consulted the Parole Board about how this objective might best be achieved in a way that ensures that the crucial role of the board in the parole scheme is maintained. The Parole Board expressed a wish to continue to see all of the cases that are currently scrutinised by the board, following the initial review by the local review committees, in order to give full consideration to the circumstances of each individual prisoner. Accordingly, I have agreed that the present practice should continue on the understanding that the reviews will take account of the policy contained in this statement. Under the statute the acceptance or rejection of a Parole Board recommendation is, of course, a matter for me.I am asking the Parole Board to implement this new policy with immediate effect. This statement will be issued to local review committees for their guidanc. The board intends to pubish the text in its next annual report as an addition to the detailed "Criteria for Selection for Parole", in which there will also be some minor consequential amendments.
Life Sentence Prisoners
The release of life sentence prisoners is at the discretion of the Home Secretary, subject to a favourable recommendation by the Parole Board and to consultation with the Lord Chief Justice and, if he is available, the trial judge. Taking account again of the public concern about violent crime, in future I intend to exercise my discretion so that murderers of police or prison officers, terrorist murderers, sexual or sadistic murderers of children and murderers by firearm in the course of robbery can normally expect to serve at least 20 years in custody; and there will be cases where the gravity of the offence requires a still longer period. Other murders, outside these categories, may merit no less punishment to mark the seriousness of the offence.
At present I look to the judiciary for advice on the time to be served to satisfy the requirements of retribution and deterrence and to the Parole Board for advice on risk. I shall continue to do so.
The joint Parole Board/Home Office committee was established in 1973 to give initial consideration, usually after a life sentence prisoner had been detained for about three years in custody, to the date for the first formal consideration of the case by the Parole Board machinery. The Lord Chief Justice has agreed with me that this is the appropriate time to obtain an initial judicial view on the requirements of retribution and deterrence. In future, therefore, I shall decide the date of the first reference of a case to a local review committee following the initial consultation with the judiciary. The joint committee has therefore been disbanded.
The first local review committee review will normally take place three years before the expiry of the period necessary to meet the requirements of retribution and deterrence. This would give sufficient tine for preparation for release if the Parole Board recommended it, having considered risk. The judiciary will also be consulted when release is an actual possibility to meet fully the requirements of section 61 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967.
These new procedures will separate consideration of the requirements of retribution and deterrence from consideration of risk to the public, which always has been, and will continue to be, the pre-eminent factor determining release. They will continue to be, the pre-eminent factor determining release. They will enable the prison and other staff responsible for considering and reporting on life sentence cases, the local review committees and the Parole Board, to concentrate on risk. The judiciary will properly advise on retribution and deterrence. But the ultimate discretion whether to release will remain with me.
Life sentence prisoners who already have a provisional date of release are unaffected by these new arrangements. Those who have reached the stage of being held in an open prison are similarly unaffected, because the four prisoners whose release in the relatively near future would not have accorded with my view of the gravity of their offences have already been returned to closed prisons. Life sentence prisoners whose cases the joint committee had asked to consider again will, at the time fixed for that consideration have a date fixed for their first local review committee review after consultation with the judiciary as I have outlined. Those who have a date for review by the local review committee already fixed will be reviewed as arranged, but the judiciary will be consulted on retribution and deterrence before the case is referred to the Parole Board.
When a date for a first, or subsequent, formal review is set for several years ahead, the Home Office will review the case on the basis of reports of the kind now prepared for formal reviews, at regular, and in any event not longer than three-year, intervals. Moreover, governors will be told to report at once any exceptional development requiring action. These procedures will ensure that I can consider any special circumstances or exceptional progress which might justify changing the review date. But except where a prisoner has committed an offence for which he has received a further custodial sentence, first formal review date will not be put back. In any event, Ministers will review every case when a life sentence prisoner has been detained for 10 years.
Sentencing Policy And Parole
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what representations he has received since 11 October 1983 on the questions of longer sentences and withdrawal of parole.
We have received some 99 letters of a general nature on the proposals made on 11 October. Of these, 58—including one from an hon. Member—have expressed approval of the proposals and 29 have suggested that they are too lenient. We have also received 64 representations about the effect of the proposals on individual prisoners.
Refugees (Asylum)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what arrangements are made for the deportation of asylum seekers who are refused refugee status; and if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the number of such persons, their country of origin and the destination to which they were deported for each of the last five years.
People whose applications for asylum are refused may nevertheless be allowed to remain in this country exceptionally or may leave voluntarily. There are no special arrangements for deportation of such people. Cases are considered in the normal way under paragraphs 148 to 171 of the Immigration Rules, which provide in certain circumstances for deportation to a country other than that of which the person is a national. Deportations of such people are not recorded separately and the information requested could be obtained only at disproportinate cost.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many asylum seekers were given refugee status and domicile; how many were rejected in the last year; and if he will make a statement.
During the 12 months to 30 June 1983, 1,498 persons were granted refugee status, 617 others were granted asylum and 1,723 applications were refused.
Live Animals (Experiments)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list those interested organisations from which he has had responses on the White Paper, "Scientific Procedures on Living Animals", and when he expects to introduce legislation arising from it.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he plans to introduce legislation to replace the Cruelty to Animals Act 1876.
The major organisations which have submitted comments on the White Paper are as follows. In some cases responses have come from more than one department of the same place. Legislation will be introduced as soon as parliamentary time permits.UNIVERSITIES
- Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals of the Universities of the United Kingdom
- Aberdeen University
- Birmingham University
- Cambridge University
- Glasgow University
- Liverpool University
- London University
- Guy's Hospital Medical School
- Hammersmith Hospital
- Royal Postgraduate Medical School
- Imperial College of Science and Technology
- Middlesex Hospital Medical School
- Royal Veterinary College
- St. Mary's Hospital Medical School
- Newcastle upon Tyne University
- Surrey University
SCIENTIFIC AND PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES
- Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists
- Biochemical Society
- Biological Council
- British Laboratory Animals Veterinary Association
- British Psychological Society
- British Toxicology Society
- British Veterinary Association
- Institute of Biology
- Laboratory Animals' Science Association
- Mammal Society
- Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain
- Physiological Society
- Research Defence Society
- Royal College of Pathologists
- Royal College of Surgeons of England
- Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons
- Society for Experimental Biology
INDUSTRY AND ASSOCIATED ORGANISATIONS
- Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry
- Association of Independent Contract Research Organisations
- Beecham Pharmaceuticals
- Boots Company plc
- British Agrochemicals Association
- British Industrial Biological Research Association
- Celltech Ltd
- Chemical Industries Association
- Ciba-Geigy Pharmaceuticals Division
- Cosmetic, Toiletry and Perfumery Association Ltd
- FBC Ltd
- Fisons plc
- Glaxo Group Research Limited
- Hazelton Laboratories (Europe) Ltd
- Hoechst UK Ltd
- ICI plc
- Miles Laboratories Ltd
- Roche Ltd
- Searle Research and Development
- Wellcome Research Laboratories
ANIMAL WELFARE ORGANISATIONS
- Animal Aid
- British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection
- Committee for the Reform of Animal Experimentation
- Crusade Against All Cruelty to Animals Ltd
- Farm Animal Welfare Co-ordinating Executive
- Flesh and Blood
- Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments
- National Anti-Vivisection Society Ltd
- Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
- Scottish Anti-Vivisection Society
- Scottish Society for the Prevention of Vivisection
- Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
OTHERS
- Agricultural Research Council
- British Association for Cancer Research
- General Synod of the Church of England
- Medical Research Council
- Medical Research Council (MRC Radiobiology Unit)
- Natural Environment Research Council
- Nature Conservancy Council
- Pharmaceuticals Economic Development Committee
- University Grants Committee
Detained Persons
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) men, (b) women and (c) juveniles where being held in police and court cells at the latest available date; and at which locations.
On the night of 24–25 November there were 478 prisoners in police cells of whom 452 were adult males, nine males under 21, 14 adult females and three females under 21. Prisoners were held by the Metropolitan, City, Kent, Sussex, Essex, Thames Valley, Hampshire, Hertfordshire, Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Suffolk, Lincolnshire, Leicestershire, Warwickshire, West Midlands, Wiltshire and Avon and Somerset forces.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the number of police officers employed in dealing with remand prisoners held in police and court cells at the latest available date.
This information is not collected centrally, and it could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he still expects to be able to end the use of police and court cells to house remand prisioners by the end of the year.
This remains our intention.
Private Security Firms (Licensing)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will introduce a licensing system for private security firms; and if he will make a statement.
No. The Government support self-regulation by the industry. Both the British Security Industry Association and the International Professional Security Association require their members to adhere to professional standards and codes of conduct, and each has set up an inspectorate to monitor compliance.
Violent Crimes
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many persons have been convicted of violent crimes so far in 1983.
This information is not yet available.
Police (Effectiveness And Efficiency)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what steps he is taking to promote effectiveness and efficiency in the police service.
The number of police officers and expenditure on the police service have increased substantially in recent years, and most forces have been able to recruit up to their establishments. It is a major aim of my policy to ensure that these increased resources are used as effectively and eficiently as possible. I have today issued a circular to police authorities and chief officers of police inviting them to review their objectives and priorities and to ensure that resources are allocated and police and civilian manpower deployed in a way that will most effectively and efficiently secure those objectives and priorities. The circular has been prepared in consultation with representatives of the local authority associations and of chief officers of police. I have placed a copy in the Library of the House.
Repatriation
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many persons, identified as families and
| Persons Travelling Singly | |||||||||||||
| *1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | †1983 | Total | |
| Australia | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Bangladesh | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| Barbados | — | 1 | — | — | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 20 |
| Canada | — | 1 | 1 | 10 | 9 | — | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | 23 |
| Dominica | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | — | 4 |
| Fiji | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | 1 |
| Gambia | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| Ghana | 1 | — | 1 | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| Grenada | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | — | 11 |
| Guyana | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | 1 | — | — | 2 |
| India | — | — | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| Jamaica | 3 | 7 | 13 | 10 | 29 | 38 | 9 | 28 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 28 | 217 |
| Mauritius | — | 1 | — | — | — | 1 | — | 1 | — | — | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3 | — | — | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | 1 | 24 |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1 | — | — | 2 | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | — | — | 6 |
| Sierra Leone | — | — | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | 3 |
| Somalia | — | — | — | — | 4 | 6 | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | 11 |
| South Africa | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| St. Lucia | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| St. Vincent | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | 1 |
| Trinidad | — | 1 | 1 | — | — | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | — | 13 |
| United States | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Yemen | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Zimbabwe | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 3 | 2 | 13 |
| Total | 8 | 15 | 19 | 22 | 53 | 66 | 24 | 44 | 25 | 33 | 42 | 41 | 392 |
| Persons Travelling as Part of a Family | |||||||||||||
| *1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | †1983 | Total | |
| Algeria | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| Argentina | — | — | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | — | — | 9 |
| Australia | — | 4 | — | —. | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | 6 |
| Bangladesh | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | — | 6 |
| Barbados | 6 | 9 | 11 | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 10 | — | 63 |
| Canada | — | — | 12 | 84 | 178 | 23 | 7 | 3 | 6 | — | — | — | 313 |
| Dominica | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 2 | — | 10 |
| Fiji | — | — | 8 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | 11 |
| Ghana | 5 | 11 | — | — | 6 | — | — | 4 | — | — | — | — | 26 |
| Grenada | — | — | — | — | 6 | — | 2 | 4 | 10 | — | 6 | — | 28 |
| Guyana | — | 2 | 10 | — | 9 | — | — | 13 | — | — | 2 | 8 | 44 |
| India | 5 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | — | 14 |
| Jamaica | 4 | 85 | 69 | 14 | 83 | 55 | 33 | 76 | 52 | 34 | 75 | 42 | 622 |
| Malaysia | — | — | — | — | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | — | 9 |
| Mauritius | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | — | — | 6 | 8 | 6 | — | 26 |
| Nigeria | 23 | 40 | 88 | 32 | 19 | 67 | 31 | 26 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 346 |
| Pakistan | — | — | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 |
| Seychelles | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 |
| South Africa | — | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Sri Lanka | — | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 |
| St. Lucia | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | — | — | 4 |
| St. Vincent | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | — | 4 |
| Trinidad | — | — | 6 | — | — | 5 | 10 | 5 | 5 | — | 4 | — | 35 |
| United States | — | 4 | — | 3 | 3 | 4 | — | — | — | 3 | 6 | 4 | 27 |
| Zimbabwe | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 55 | 4 | 79 |
| Total | 43 | 164 | 213 | 133 | 314 | 168 | 88 | 143 | 95 | 97 | 184 | 61 | 1,703 |
Notes:
1. The tables show departures by the year in which they were confirmed to the Home Office by International Social Service of Great Britain which operates the voluntary repatriation scheme under section 29 of the Immigration Act 1971 on the Government's behalf.
single persons, have been repatriated to which countries by name under section 29 of the Immigration Act 1971 in each year since the Act came into effect.
[pursuant to his reply, 24 November 1983, c. 234]: The available information about the number of persons who have received financial assistance with their return overseas under section 29 of the Immigration Act 1971 is as follows:
2. From the information available it is not possible to determine how many of the persons travelling singly were unmarried.
* From 1 April.
† To 31 October.
Scotland
Secondary Schools (Pupil Costs)
1.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how much was spent per pupil in secondary schools in Scotland in the most recent year for which figures are available; and how this compares with the figure for 1978–79, at constant prices.
In 1982–83 net expenditure per pupil in secondary schools in Scotland at outturn prices was £1,267—excluding Orkney and Western Isles, for which information is not yet available. The out-turn figure for 1978–79 was £695. This represents an increase of 2·9 per cent. over the equivalent expenditure in 1978–79, at 1981–82 price levels.
Dryburgh Abbey Hotel
2.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement about the sale of the Dryburgh Abbey hotel, St. Boswells.
The Scottish Transport Group has now sold this hotel, which did not operate profitably in recent years and which was peripheral to its main areas of business.
Job Prospects
15.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he has had recent discussions with the Confederation of British Industry in Scotland about job prospects.
I have not recently had formal discussions with the Confederation of British Industry in Scotland about job prospects, but I do, of course, frequently meet representatives of the CBI. On Monday 7 November I addressed members of the CBI and their guests on the occasion of the highly successful CBI national conference in Glasgow.
Blood Supplies
16.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the estimated amount of blood likely to be required annually to meet the needs of the new Ross Hill private hospital in Glasgow; and what steps he is taking to ensure that no profit is made by anyone on the supply of such blood.
The hospital estimates that it will require about 1,000 units per annum. The agreement drawn up by the Common Services Agency includes the provision that blood supplied by the blood transfusion service will not be sold to patients, nor to any other establishment either within the United Kingdom or overseas.
Carstairs Hospital
17.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he is satisfied with the admissions procedures at Carstairs hospital.
Yes.
South Of Scotland Electricity Board
18.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will discuss with the chairman of the South of Scotland Electricity Board the need for a more rapid programme to remove overhead cables in built-up areas on main roads.
My right hon. Friend has no immediate plans to do so. My officials meet the board's senior officials regularly to discuss its general plans but any programme to remove overhead cables in built-up areas on main roads is the responsibility of the board.
Hamilton College Of Education
19.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a further statement about the sale of the former Hamilton college of education buildings and land.
Sale of the residential accommodation to Miller Homes Northern Ltd. is conditional on the granting of necessary planning and building consents. I understand that Millers has received the appropriate building warrant but has not as yet received relevant planning clearances from Hamilton district council.
Elderly Persons
20.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he is satisfied with the provision of appropriate accommodation for the elderly in Scotland; and if he will make a statement.
The level and standard of provision is reasonably satisfactory in most areas and the resources made available to local authorities and health boards will enable them to take into account the needs of the elderly in developing services.
Primary Schools
21.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many primary schools have been closed in Scotland during the past 12 months.
Detailed information on school closures is no longer held centrally. Between the annual school censuses taken in September 1982 and September 1983 the total number of education authority primary schools in Scotland fell from 2,489 to 2,459, but these figures do not separately identify closures or new openings.
Departmental Staff
22.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many of his Department's civil servants are employed in Scotland; and what percentage of the total numbers this constitutes.
10,159 at 1 November 1983. This constitutes 99·6 per cent. of the Scottish Office staff in post at that date.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what were the manpower levels in his Department in June 1983; and what are his plans for those levels in June 1984.
Staff in post in the Scottish Office at the nearest date for the quarterly manpower count was 10,270 at 1 July 1983. The manpower figures planned for 1984–85 are 9,800 at 1 April 1984 and 9,909 at 1 April 1985; no specific figure is planned for June 1984. The figures include staff in the Scottish prison service.
Community Programme
23.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people are employed under the community programme in Scotland at the most recent convenient date; and what percentage this number represents of the original quota target set for Scotland for 1983–84.
At 31 October 1983, 15,490 people were employed on the community programme in Scotland. This represents 101 per cent. of the original target for Scotland for 1983–84.
Greater Glasgow Health Board
24.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland when he last met with the chairman of the Greater Glasgow Health Board to discuss the reorganisation of the Board's structure.
The chairman of Greater Glasgow health board was present at the meeting which I had with all chairmen on 8 November. Following that meeting, and with the concurrence of the chairmen, my right hon. Friend announced that he would be instructing all health boards to abolish their district level of management.
Labour Statistics
25.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on current unemployment figures in the Grampian region.
On 13 October 1983 the number of unemployed persons in Grampian region was 15,594. The unemployment rate was 8·5 per cent., well below the overall Scottish figure of 14·9 per cent. The region is in approximately the same position as the same time last year when the number of unemployed claimants stood at 15,000 and the percentage rate was 8·3 per cent. The general trend in Scotland is that the rate of increase in unemployment is slowing down and the available evidence supports the same pattern in Grampian region.
33.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list the total increase in unemployment in the Highland region since June 1979.
With the introduction of voluntary registration in October 1982 the basis for compiling unemployment statistics changed from registrants to claimants and the figures before and after that date are not therefore comparable.The increase in the number of registrants in the Highland region from June 1979 to October 1982 was 4,598. The increase in the number of unemployed claimants between October 1982 and October 1983, the latest date for which information is available, was 11.
34.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what progress he expects in the reduction of unemployment in Scotland in the next year.
It has not been the practice of this or previous Governments to forecast unemployment. Recent figures, however, are encouraging: over the past year the rise in unemployment in Scotland has moderated very considerably and in fact the seasonally adjusted total in October was over 2,000 lower than in July.
Agriculture Industry
26.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will meet the president and executive members of the Scottish National Farmers Union to discuss the situation in the agriculture industry.
My right hon. Friend and my right hon. and noble Friend have discussions with the president and other union representatives on a wide range of matters as the need arises. My right hon. and noble Friend met the president and the union's general purposes committee on Friday, 11 November.
Highlands And Islands Development Board
27.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland when he last met the chairman of the Highlands and Islands Development Board; and what subjects were discussed.
My right hon. Friend has had a number of recent contacts with the chairman of the Highlands and Islands Development Board but their last meeting to deal with specific issues affecting the board was on 22 April 1983, when fisheries matters were discussed. My right hon. and noble Friend the Minister of State, who has special responsibilities for the Highlands and Islands, meets the chairman regularly, most recently on 28 October 1983.
Rural Areas
28.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what action he is taking to promote development in the rural areas of Scotland.
29.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what action he is taking to promote development in rural areas.
I refer the hon. Gentlemen to the reply I have given today to the hon. Member for Orkney and Shetland (Mr. Wallace).
Schools (Composite Classes)
30.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will arrange to meet teachers' organisations to discuss composite classes.
No. School organisation is primarily the responsibility of the education authorities.
Housing Repair Grants
31.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on his discussions with housing authorities in Scotland over the financial implications of the Scottish Office circular letter on improvement repair grants.
I met representatives of Glasgow and Edinburgh district councils on 16 and 21 November respectively to discuss this matter. I shall take into account all their views, and those of other authorities who have met my officials or made representations, in determining their capital allocations for 1984–85.
Company Liquidations
32.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many companies have been reported as going into receivership since 9 June 1982; and if he will make a statement.
The number of companies that have gone into receivership between July 1982 and September 1983—inclusive—which is the period for which figures are available, is 3,789 in Great Britain and 210 in Scotland. The appointment of a receiver does not necessarily mean liquidation, as sometimes a buyer can be found for a company in receivership.
Council House Sales
35.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many houses were sold by Kirkcaldy district council to the latest available date; and what is the number of applications to purchase which are still outstanding.
A total of 1,575 houses were sold by Kirkcaldy district council between 1 April 1979 and 30 September 1983. Of these, 808 applications to purchase were current at the end of September 1983; missives had been concluded on 30 of these cases.
Alcoholism
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if there have been any measureable consequences in terms of alcoholism and drink-related offences since the Licensing (Scotland) Act 1976 came into operation.
In Scotland since 1976 the upward trend in alcohol-related diseases has slowed; drunkenness offences have decreased; and drunk driving offences show a slower rate of increase than for motoring offences overall. I cannot, however, say to what extent these changes may result from the provisions of the 1976 Act because of the many variables affecting the relevant statistics.
Divorce
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland when he intends to introduce legislation to implement changes in the law concerning financial provision after divorce, in line with recommendations made by the Scottish Law Commission in November 1981.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply which I gave to the hon. Member for Clackmannan (Mr. O'Neill) on 28 November.
Radioactive Waste
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many sites in Scotland are licensed for the disposal of radioactive wastes; what is the exact location of each site; who owns the sites; when their current licences are due for renewal; and whether any of the sites that have been licensed are as yet unused.
In Scotland disposals of these wastes have to be authorised by my right hon. Friend under the Radioactive Substances Act 1960. The disposal of certain low activity wastes, rising mainly from medical establishments, research institutes and universities, is authorised at 11 sites in Aberdeen, Clackmannan, Dundee, East Kilbride, East Lothian, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Kirkcaldy, Stirling and Strathkelvin. All the sites are owned or managed by district councils, which are waste disposal authorities in Scotland. Authorisations in most cases do not require renewal, and according to the information available to me all the sites are at present in use. The use of all of these sites has been the subject of consultations with the relevant local authorities and the methods of disposal followed by them are as outlined in the booklet "Radioactive Substances Act 1960: A guide to the administration of the Act" as published in 1982.
Housing
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the total amount of housing support grant to Scottish local authorities; and what was the average amount of housing support grant per council tenant in 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82, 1982–83 and 1983–84, respectively.
The information is as follows:
| Year | Total Housing Support Grant* | Average Housing Support Grant per Council Tenants† |
| £ | £ | |
| 1979–80 | 213,400,000 | 239 |
| 1980–81 | 228,200,000 | 255 |
| 1981–82 | 161,900,000 | 181 |
| 1982–83 | 104,632,870 | 118 |
| 1983–84 | 72,135,479 | 82 |
| * The figures for the years 1979–80 to 1982–83 include the provision made in both the main orders and subsequent variation orders. The figure for 1983–84 is that prescribed under the main order. | ||
| † Based on local authority returns of housing stocks to Scottish Development Department. | ||
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the total amount of local authorities' rate fund contribution to their housing revenue accounts in Scotland; and what was the average amount of rate fund contribution to the housing revenue account per council tenant, in 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82, 1982–83 and 1983–84, respectively.
The information is as follows:
| Year | Total Rate Fund Contribution to Housing Revenue Accounts £ | Average Rate Fund Contribution to Housing Revenue Account per Council Tenant £ |
| 1979–80 | 72,923,733 | 82 |
| 1980–81 | 82,068,711 | 92 |
| 1981–82 | 106,827,354 | 120 |
| 1982–83 | 123,556,485 | 140 |
| 1983–84 | 125,700,850 | 144 |
Source: 1979–80–1982–83—Local Returns to Scottish Development Department.
1983–84—Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy Rating Review (June 1983).
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the average unrebated rent paid by tenants of local authorities, new towns and the Scottish Special Housing Association in each year since 1978–79.
Information on unrebated rent as at 30 September from 1978 to 1982 is published in "Scottish Housing Statistics"—Nos. 8, 12, 16 and 20—which are available in the Library. For 1983 the average annual unrebated rent for local authorities is estimated to be £512·16, the figure for new towns being £660·62, and for Scottish Special Housing Association, £622·14.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the average subsidy, excluding rent and rate
| Housing Revenue Account | |||||
| Year | Loan charges | Supervision and management | Repairs and maintenance | Other expenditure | Total |
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| 1978–79 | 278,309,471 | 31,447,622 | 97,018,592 | 9,585,218 | 416,360,903 |
| 1979–80 | 343,009,867 | 38,925,339 | 126,288,576 | 9,868,743 | 518,092,525 |
| 1980–81 | 400,128,704 | 51,316,757 | 146,398,608 | 17,481,885 | 615,325,954 |
| 1981–82 | 413,826,369 | 55,855,786 | 165,464,754 | 16,208,820 | 651,355,729 |
| 1982–83 | 415,902,903 | 57,391,693 | 178,562,070 | 18,408,825 | 670,265,491 |
| 1983–84 | 415,163,471 | 67,834,084 | 173,805,486 | 15,415,275 | 672,218,316 |
Source:
1978–79–1982–83—Local Authority Returns tc Scottish Development Department.
1983–84—Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy Rating Review (June 1983).
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what the total amount of income in Scotland to local authority housing revenue accounts from housing support
| Housing Revenue Account | |||||
| Year | Housing support grant | Rate fund contributions | Rents | Other income | Total |
| £ | £ | £ | £ | £ | |
| 1978–79 | *142,706,504 | 55,614,509 | 205,759,512 | 12,280,378 | 416,360,903 |
| 1979–80 | 200,249,983 | 72,923,733 | 227,526,487 | 17,392,322 | 518,092,525 |
| 1980–81 | 228,233,985 | 82,068,711 | 272,882,782 | 32,140,476 | 615,325,954 |
| 1981–82 | 161,900,030 | 106,827,354 | 355,954,353 | 26,674,022 | 651,355,729 |
| 1982–83 | 104,353,253 | 123,556,485 | 414,340,310 | 28,015,443 | 670,265,491 |
| 1983–84 | 72,498,715 | 125,700,850 | 449,375,992 | 24,642,759 | 672,218,316 |
| * This figure represents subsidies appropriate to housing revenue account prior to introduction of HSG in 1979–80. | |||||
Source:
1978–79–1982–83—Local Authority Returns to Scottish Development Department.
1983–84—Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy Rating Review (June 1983).
Motor Cycle Casualties
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was his response to the recent letter to him from the Scottish committee of the Medical Commission on Accident Prevention about motor cycle casualties.
My Department has written to the committee thanking it for its congratulations on the steps taken by the Government with regard to seat belts and the regulations introduced to try to reduce motor cycle
rebates, to new town, Scottish Special Housing Association and housing association tenants in 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82, 1982–83 and 1983–84, respectively.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what the total amount of local authority housing revenue account expenditure in Scotland on loan charges, supervision and management, repairs and maintenance and other sources in 1978–79, 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82, 1982–83, and 1983–84, respectively.
The information is as follows:grant, rate fund contributions, rents and other sources in 1978–79, 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82, 1982–83, and 1983–84, respectively.
The information is as follows:accidents; noting a reduction in the number of motor cycle casualties—of all severities—between 1981 and 1982; and assuring the committee that my right hon. Friend will continue his efforts to reduce road accidents and their consequences.
Solicitor-General For Scotland
Prosecution Policy
40.
asked the Solicitor-General for Scotland what guidance he has given to procurators fiscal with regard to the prosecution of more than one individual for offences which could have only been committed by one person.
I have given no general guidance to procurators fiscal with regard to such prosecutions.
Salmon
41.
asked the Solicitor-General for Scotland how many prosecutions there have been, in the last convenient year, for salmon poaching in Scotland.
There are no figures available for the number of prosecutions for salmon poaching as such. However, in 1981, which is the last year for which figures are available, 364 persons were proceeded against for offences relating to salmon and freshwater fisheries.
Police (Complaints)
42.
asked the Solicitor-General for Scotland when he last met the procurators fiscal to discuss the investigation of complaints against the police.
I last met all the senior procurators fiscal to discuss investigation of complaints against the police in November 1982. Since then I have met individual procurators fiscal to discuss particular cases.
Sexual Assaults
43.
asked the Solicitor-General for Scotland what discussions he has had concerning the Scottish Office social research study "Investigating Sexual Assault".
| Numbers in Training | ||||||
| TOPS* | ||||||
| Skillcentre | Operational Places | Initial Training | Skillplus | Sponsored | YOP/YTS† | Total |
| Barking | 152 | 129 | — | 4 | 3 | 136 |
| Deptford | 186 | 111 | — | — | 39 | 150 |
| Enfield | 276 | 206 | 12 | 13 | 1 | 232 |
| Perivale | 212 | 124 | 8 | 13 | 4 | 149 |
| Twickenham | 188 | 131 | 5 | 14 | 3 | 153 |
| Hounslow Annexe | 92 | 72 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 82 |
| Waddon | 136 | 107 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 113 |
| Sydenham Annexe | 98 | 70 | 4 | 8 | — | 82 |
| Total | 1,340 | 950 | 34 | 54 | 59 | 1,097 |
| * Training opportunities scheme. | ||||||
| † Youth opportunities programme and youth training scheme. | ||||||
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many female instructors are currently engaged at skillcentres (a) in the Greater London area and (b) in the Deptford skillcentre.
I have been considering this report, which focuses on the police investigation of sexual assault complaints and which raises matters of considerable importance. Discussions are to be held with the Association of Chief Police Officers (Scotland), to examine matters raised by the report and any action required.
Employment
West Midlands (Training)
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what provision the Manpower Services Commission is making for the training in new technology of those in, as well as those out of work, in the west midlands.
The Government are currently providing support for around 600 adults to train in computing and new technology skills in the west midlands. In addition, 360 places are available for young people to train in new technology skills at nine information technology centres and 11 more centres, providing up to 400 more places, are planned.Although separate figures are not available for the west midlands, we are also providing support under a number of national schemes designed to train employed people in new technology skills. Two major projects under our open tech programme are located in the west midlands.
Skillcentres
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will provide a table in the Official Report showing the numbers of training places available in each skillcentre in the Greater London area and the current number of trainees undergoing courses in each skillcentre.
Currently 1,340 operational training places are available in skillcentres in the Greater London area. On 25 November 1,097 trainees were undergoing courses in these skillcentres. Details for each skillcentre are shown in the following table:
One female skillcentre instructor is currently employed in the Greater London area at the Deptford skillcentre. All posts are open to men and women.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) how many skillcentres have nursery or creche facilities available; and how many infants are at present attending them;(2) if he will make a statement about the funding of creche facilities located in skillcentres
(a) by the Manpower Services Commission and (b) by local authorities.
There are no nursery or creche facilities in skillcentres.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many (a) women and (b) men are currently undergoing training courses at skillcentres in the Greater London area; and how many are currently undergoing courses at the Deptford skillcentre.
Currently 921 men and 63 women are undergoing training courses at skillcentres in the Greater London area, including 99 men and 12 women at the Deptford skillcentre.
Women (Training)
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what steps his Department are taking to encourage the training of women for employment in nontraditional areas.
Government training programmes, including the youth training scheme and the training opportunities scheme, are open equally to men and women. The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 allows certain training bodies to provide training or give encouragement to women to enter areas of work where they have been under represented in the previous 12 months. My right hon. Friend designates training bodies for this purpose. To date, 45 such bodies have been so designated.
Greater London (Training)
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many (a) women and (b) men are currently receiving training at colleges in the Greater London area and are sponsored by the Manpower Services Commission.
Currently 2,51'7 women and 1,512 men are receiving training under the training opportunities programme at colleges in Greater London. Some 432 young women and 709 young men are also receiving training on mode B2 schemes sponsored by colleges in Greater London under the youth training scheme, and on some work skills courses under the youth opportunities programme.
Careers Service Advisory Council For England
asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether he will make a statement about the reconstitution of the careers service advisory council for England.
I have decided not to reconstitute the council as I believe that it is better to consult interested organisations on particular issues as they arise.
Youth Training Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list in the Official Report the companies which are providing youth training scheme places through the large companies unit; and what are the number of trainees involved in each case.
[pursuant to his reply, 25 November 1983, c. 339]: So far the large companies unit has negotiated the establishment of over 85,000 training places under 149 contracts with companies and other organisations. Information about individual managing agents' schemes is treated in confidence by the Manpower Services Commission. However, the commission is considering compiling a national directory of managing agents, to be made publicly available with the agreement of the organisations concerned.
Social Services
Leukaemia
44.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what was the waiting list for treatment for people suffering from leukaemia in the Mersey area health authority at the latest date.
The information is not available centrally.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many beds there are in the Mersey regional area health authority for the treatment of leukaemia; and if he is satisfied with the present level of provision.
It is for individual health authorities to decide on the level of provision of beds within the allocations they receive. I suggest the hon. Member writes to the chairman of the Mersey regional health authority who may be able to give him the required information.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the average waiting time for those awaiting National Health Service treatment for leukaemia in the Mersey region at the latest date.
The information requested is not available centrally, but it is estimated that 94 per cent. of all admissions for leukaemia in the Mersey regional health authority in 1981 were either immediate admissions or cases with a given date of admission at the time the decision to admit was made. The hon. Member may wish to contact the chairman of Mersey regional health authority who may be able to give him more detailed information.
North Staffordshire Royal Infirmary
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) whether any new procedures or facilities have been introduced at the North Staffordshire royal infirmary following criticisms by the coroner that a live baby was not accorded proper attention at birth;(2) whether any disciplinary action was taken against the senior house officer at North Staffordshire royal infirmary, who was criticised by the coroner for altering the notes which recorded the birth of a live baby on 21 May 1983 so that all reference to life was obliterated.
The North Staffordshire health authority instituted new procedures for nursing staff soon after the birth in question, and asked the consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist to review urgently procedures for medical staff. The authority has also taken disciplinary action against a member of the junior medical staff regarding falsification of records. I will be sending the hon. Member full details shortly.
Health Authorities (Capital Projects)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if regional health authorities are obliged to inform him of capital projects deferred following expenditure and staff reductions in the current year.
Major capital projects under construction are monitored by the Department and any delays or deferments are notified to us. There is no obligation on health authorities to inform us of deferments of proposed capital developments. I do not believe that any authority need defer an essential capital project because of staffing or expenditure arrangements this year. Financial provision for capital spending next year is based on a planned 2 per cent. increase in real terms.
Hospital Closures
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how may hospitals in England and in the North-East Thames regional health authority, respectively it is proposed to close as a result of the 0·5 per cent. reduction in expenditure based on efficiency, the 1 per cent. reduction in expenditure announced by the Chancellor and staff reductions in the current year.
Proposals for the permanent closure of hospitals are made for a variety of reasons including replacement of old or dilapidated stock, changes in the pattern of medical treatment, greater efficiency in the delivery of services and the redeployment of services to match movement in population. Ministers would not approve the permanent closure of hospitals simply as a result of the expenditure arrangements referred to by the hon. Member.
Unemployment Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he will instruct his Department's offices to deduct Territorial Army earnings from benefits due to unemployed persons after and not before payment for training has been received.
Unemployment benefit is not payable for any day on which a claimant is engaged in any employment with earnings exceeding £2 for that day. This is because such days—when the claimant is engaged in employment which cannot be regarded as minimal—are not to be treated as days of unemployment. We have no plans to amend the law in this respect, which would have repercussions for other national insurance benefits. As regards supplementary benefit, different considerations apply, and that benefit is not reduced until earnings, whether from Territorial Army or other activities, are received.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will estimate the percentage of the unemployed who are actually receiving unemployment benefit.
This information is given in the "Quarterly Analysis of Unemployed Claimants", a copy of which is in the Library of the House. That shows that at August 1983, the latest date for which information is available, 31·2 per cent. of unemployed claimants were currently receiving unemployment benefit. Another 7·1 per cent. had claimed unemployment benefit, but their claims had not yet been determined on the day the count was made.
Nhs (Early Retirement Costs)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what was the cost to the Yorkshire regional health authority of early retirement in 1982–83.
The Yorkshire regional health authority was not required to meet the costs of superannuation and compensation payments for officers retiring prematurely in the region, since these are met from central funds. Employing authorities are responsible for redundancy payments to those prematurely retired employees so entitled. Details of redundancy payments are not held centrally.
Expenditure
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the expenditure per head of population in the area health authority which has (a) the lowest expenditure per head in the United Kingdom and (b) with the highest.
It is not clear what information is required in addition to that given in my reply, and the replies of my right hon. Friends the Secretaries of State for Scotland and Wales to my hon. Friend on 14 November 1983—[Vol. 48, c. 298–300,324,336–338.] Health services are organised differently in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Area health authorities in England and Wales were abolished in 1982.If my hon. Friend cares to write to me, I will endeavour to provide him with such additional information as he requires.
Benefits (Earnings Limit)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the earnings allowed before reduction of benefit for those on (a) state pension and (b) supplementary benefit payable to the long-term unemployed; and if he will include figures for each year since 1970, in terms of 1983 prices.
The following table shows the earnings limit for retirement pension and the earnings disregard for supplementary benefit current in 1970 and subsequently in those years when the levels were revised, together with the value of these in October 1983, rounded to the nearest 10p.
Date of introduction
| Retirement Pension Earnings limit £ weekly
| Value in October 1983 terms £ weekly
|
Retirement pension
| ||
| November 1969 | 7·50 | 36·70 |
| September 1971 | 9·50 | 39·90 |
| July 1974 | 13·00 | 40·40 |
| April 1975 | 20·00 | 52·80 |
| April 1976 | 35 00 | 77·70 |
| November 1977 | 40·00 | 72·70 |
| November 1978 | 45·00 | 75·70 |
| November 1979 | 52·00 | 74·50 |
| November 1982 | 57·00 | 59·60 |
| November 1983 | 65·00 | — |
Supplementary benefit
| ||
| November 1966 | 1·00 | 5·50 |
| November 1975 | 2·00 | 4·70 |
| November 1980 | 4·00 | 5·00 |
Supplementary Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what was the average rent and rates addition paid with supplementary benefit in 1982–83.
An overall average for 1982–83 is not available because of the partial start of the housing benefit scheme. The average amount of housing requirement for tenants added into the supplementary benefit assessment in a week in August 1982* was £16.14. The housing requirement is the amount included in the assessment of requirements after deducting income from sub-tenants, charges for amenities, rent and rate rebates in payment to the claimant and attributable contributions from non-dependents in the household.
* Source: August Quarterly Statistical Inquiry.
Kidney Patients
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many patients with end renal failure were being treated by dialysis and/or transplantation by each of the regional health authorities in England and Wales on 1 December 1981, 1 December 1982 and on 1 June 1983; and what proportion these figures represent per million of population served by each authority.
The latest figures available from the European Dialysis and Transplantation Association are for 31 December 1981 and are as follows:
| Region | Patients on all forms of dialysis | Patients with functioning transplant | ||
| Number | Per million population | Number | Per million population | |
| Northern | 308 | 99 | 232 | 75 |
| Yorkshire | 242 | 67 | 139 | 39 |
| Trent | 467 | 104 | 175 | 39 |
| East Anglian | 156 | 82 | 204 | 107 |
| North West Thames | 248 | 71 | 291 | 83 |
| North East Thames | 476 | 128 | 341 | 92 |
| South East Thames* | 376 | 107 | 486 | 139 |
| South West Thames* | 76 | 25 | 35 | 12 |
| Wessex | 140 | 52 | 113 | 42 |
| Oxford | 183 | 79 | 179 | 78 |
| South Western | 214 | 71 | 111 | 37 |
| West Midlands | 279 | 54 | 271 | 52 |
| Mersey | 165 | 69 | 133 | 55 |
| North Western | 238 | 59 | 172 | 43 |
| * Patients from the South West Thames region are also treated in units in South East Thames. | ||||
Supplementary Benefits (Board And Lodging Limits)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he is satisfied that the guidance issued by the chief supplementary benefit officer following the Secretary of State's suggestion in Cmnd. 8978 is encouraging the improvements he accepted were needed, particularly the need for the local board and lodging limits to reflect the acutal cost of available commercial establishments; and if he is satisfied that recent increases in the board and lodging limit in central London meet that need.
Yes. The guidance issued by the chief supplementary benefit officer has led to the setting of realistic upper limits for supplementary benefit payments to people living in board and lodging accomodation, including those in central London.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what representations he has received alleging abuse of supplementary benefits paid to homeless people living in bed and breakfast hotels; and if he will seek to refute such allegations.
I have received several letters expressing concern that supplementary benefit claimants may misuse the payments they receive to pay their board and lodging charges. I have no evidence that there is any significant abuse of these payments.
Urgent Need Payments
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many payments for urgent needs have been made in the years 1978 to 1982 inclusive; and under what provisions of the relevant regulations they have been made since November 1980.
I regret that the information is not available. Data collected on the number of supplementary payments made do not separately identify those made under the urgent cases regulations.
Hospital Treatment Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether, in the absence of information later than the year 1980, he will make a sample check of the principal National Health Service hospital in each region equipped for treating retinal detachments and defects to establish for a recent week how many patients were treated for such ailments, the number who had paid in whole or in part for examination and/or treatment, and the delay between first examination and treatment in the fee-paying and non-fee-paying categories.
No. I have already told the hon. Member that I have no evidence of significant delays.—[Vol. 48, c. 570–71.]
Private Bodies (Government Assistance)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will detail the financial provision provided by Government in the financial years 1981–82, 1982–83 and 1983–84 to the following organisations: (a) the Children's Legal Centre, (b) the Family Planning Association, (c) the Brook Advisory Centre and (d) Family Forum.
The information relating to grants by the Department is as follows:
| 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | |
| £ | £ | £ | |
| Children's Legal Centre | 9,500 | 9,500 | 14,750 |
| Family Planning Association | 124,500 | 99,600 | 74,700 |
| Brook Advisory Centre | 30,000 | 22,500 | 30,000 |
| Family Forum | 22,749 | 16,915 | 27,800 |
Note: The amounts shown for 1983–84 represent sums approved for payment. Grants to the Family Planning Association are also made by my right hon. Friends the Secretaries of State for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Housing Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services why the ownership of capital is disregarded in considering eligibility for housing benefit; and if, in view of the fact that some individuals with substantial capital which does not generate income are claiming benefit, he will review the criteria for eligibility.
Although capital is not taken into account when assessing entitlement to housing benefit, any interest which that capital earns counts in full as income, and so reduces benefit.We have no current plans to review this aspect of the scheme.
Kidney Transplants
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what steps he now intends taking to increase the supply of kidneys for transplant; what extra sum of money he is making available for this work; and if he will make a statement.
We are planning a new publicity campaign early in 1984 to increase awareness of the importance of organ donation and the benefits of transplantation. We enjoy good co-operation with a number of outside agencies in the voluntary promotion of the donor card scheme, and are continuing our efforts to increase these outlets. We are also funding as a pilot project the appointment of a number of consultants to act as part-time transplant advisers with the job of improving hospital liaison procedures. The cost of kidney transplants is met from the ordinary allocations of health authorities and I understand that most renal transplant units have the capacity to perform more operations if they had more donor kidneys. The number of kidney transplants performed in the United Kingdom in 1982 was 1,030, a new record, and returns to the United Kingdom transplant service for 1983 so far suggest that even this figure will be exceeded.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he will ask each health authority to supply the names of the staff they consulted regarding the development of additional facilities for kidney treatment; and if he will include this in his report to Parliament;(2) when he expects to receive a report from the various health authorities regarding their provision for the care of kidney patients; if he will seek assurances from each of the authorities that the medical and nursing staff concerned with the treatment of kidney patients have been consulted; and if he will make a statement;(3) what action he is taking to monitor renal services; and if he will seek evidence direct from renal consultants.
We have written to all regional health authorities seeking details of current plans for developing both kidney transplantation and renal dialysis provision. My right hon. Friend will be reviewing these plans. We have asked authorities to indicate how far plans are agreed with consultants specialising in the treatment of end stage renal failure, and I would expect consultants to have discussed this with the nursing staff of their units. We are not asking authorities for the names of people consulted.
End Stage Renal Failure
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what representations he has received concerning the adequacy of facilities for the treatment of end stage renal failure; what reply he has given; and if he will make a statement.
I received a deputation led by the hon. Member on 1 November, and we have received about 150 letters on the subject this year. We have referred in our replies to the various ways in which we are seeking to improve these services, a number of which are mentioned in my replies to the hon. Member's other questions today.
Renal Services
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services on what date his advice to regional health authorities to give priority to renal services was given; what form it took; and if he will publish it in the Official Report.
We asked regional health authorities in our circular HC(83)4, issued in January 1983, to make sure that proper provision was made for the funding of regional specialties and other supra-district services which, because they meet the needs of a wider population than the district in which they are located, may not necessarily be given the right priority by "host" district health authorities with a natural desire to concentrate resources on services that meet the needs of their own population. The application of this to renal dialysis was made clear by my right hon. Friend in his reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Beaconsfield (Mr. Smith) on 24 January.—[Vol. 35, c. 288–89.]
Funeral Costs
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services on how many occasions in 1978 and in 1982 or for the last year for which figures are available there were supplementary benefit single payments to help with funeral costs; if he will categorise the claimants to whom they were made; and if he will give the average amount paid and the range of amounts.
The following information was obtained from the December 1978 and December 1982 annual statistical inquiries. It records single payment awards made during the preceding 12 months to claimants who were still in receipt of benefit on the date the exercises were carried out. It does not therefore record all such payments made during those years.
| December 1978 | Supplementary Pension Claims | Supplementary Allowance Claims |
| Number of single payments for funeral expenses | 4,000 | 2,000 |
| Average amount | £88 | £88 |
| Range of payments (of those in the sample) | £24–£158 | £21–£217 |
| December 1982 | ||
| Number of single payments for funeral expenses | 7,500 | 5,000 |
| Average amount | £214 | £204 |
| Range of payments (of those in the sample) | £2–£407 | £9–£505 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many widows made a claim for a supplementary benefit single payment to help with their husband's funeral expenses in 1982; and how many claims were successful.
Information is available only on those claims which are successful. Claimants are recorded by reference to statistical groups, according to their main source of income and many widows will therefore be recorded as retirement pensioners. The numbers and amounts of single payments for funeral expenses to supplementary benefit claimants classified as widows that were recorded in the December 1982 annual statistical inquiry are as follows:
| Number of single payments for funerals to those recorded as widows | Average amount | Range of payments* |
| 7,000 | £229 | £2 to £505 |
| * Of those in the sample. | ||
Widow's Allowance
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services from what date after the death of a husband a widow's allowance is normally paid.
Widow's allowance is payable in respect of the 26 weeks starting with the Tuesday of, or following, the husband's death. The allowance is paid weekly in advance.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what would be the total annual cost of paying widow's allowance from the date of the husband's last social security benefit, if they were receiving social security, and from the date of their deaths if they were not.
The cost would depend upon the types and amounts of benefits payable in respect of the periods immediately before and immediately after the 26 weeks for which widow's allowance is payable under current provisions. The information is not available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Widows (Benefits)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many widows in 1982 were (a) widowed, (b) entitled to widow's allowance, (c) immediately eligible for supplementary benefit, (d) became eligible for supplementary benefit after 26 weeks when the widow's allowance ceased and (e) wives of men who were dependent on social security payments at the time of their death.
About 180,000 women were widowed in 1982. The number of widows who became entitled to widow's allowance in 1982 is not yet known but is expected to be of the order of 60,000. The difference between the two figures is mainly due to the age of the husband and/or the widow and in most of the cases another benefit such as retirement pension would be payable.The other information is not available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, in circumstances in which a husband dependent on social security dies and his wife becomes entitled to widow's allowance, what is the average number of days between the last payment of benefit to the husband and the first payment of benefit to the widow; and in approximately how many cases annually there are such days for which neither the husband nor the widow receive any social security benefit.
This information is not available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Benefits
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services in how many known cases an error by an official of his Department has led to a person claiming benefits incurring a debt which would not otherwise have been incurred in the last year for which figures are available.
Cases of this kind are not identifiable from the records kept about wrongly paid benefits. Generally, overpayments of benefit resulting from departmental error or omission are not treated as debts incurred by claimants, but are regarded as irrecoverable; where official error leads to an underpayment, the mistake is rectified. If the right hon. Member has a particular case in mind, I shall be glad to consider it.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now publish the take-up estimate of supplementary benefit derived from the 1981 family expenditure survey compared with the 1979 figures; and if he will make a statement.
Take-up estimates for 1981, together with those for 1979, are as follows:
Estimates of take-up of supplementary benefit for 1981
| ||||||
Total likely to be entitled at any one time
| Proportion receiving benefit at that time
| Number eligible but not receiving benefit
| Estimated benefit unclaimed
| Average weekly amount unclaimed
| ||
(000's)
| (per cent.)
| (000's)
| (£ million per annum)
| (£)
| ||
| (i) | Pensioners | 2,480 | 67 | 810 | 210 | 5·00 |
| (ii) | Non-pensioners*, total | 2,350 | 75 | 580 | 550 | 18·10 |
| (iii) | Sick and disabled | 290 | 67 | 100 | 70 | 14·30 |
| (iv) | Unemployed | 1,580 | 75 | 400 | 410 | 19·60 |
| (v) | One-parent families not included in (iii) and (iv) | 400 | 88 | 50 | 40 | 15·30 |
| Total for all groups | 4,820 | 71 | 1,390 | 760 | 10·50 | |
Estimates of take-up of supplementary benefit for 1979
| ||||||
Total likely to be entitled at any one time
| Proportion receiving benefit at that time
| Number eligible but not receiving benefit
| Estimated benefit unclaimed
| Average weekly amount unclaimed
| ||
(000's)
| (per cent.)
| (000's)
| (£ million per annum)
| (£)
| ||
| (i) | Pensioners | 2,590 | 65 | 900 | 145 | 3·10 |
| (ii) | Non-pensioners*, total | 1,420 | 78 | 320 | 210 | 12·70 |
| (iii) | Sick and Disabled | 300 | 63 | 110 | 90 | 15·40 |
| (iv) | Unemployed | 700 | 81 | 130 | 70 | 10·50 |
| (v) | One-parent families not included in (iii) and (iv) | 370 | 85 | 60 | 30 | 10·20 |
| Total for all groups | 4,010 | 70 | 1,210 | 355 | 5·60 | |
* This total is slightly greater than the sum of lines (iii), (iv) and (v) because it includes a small residual group of miscellaneous cases. | ||||||
Notes:
1. Estimates of those with an unclaimed entitlement are based on DHSS analysis of income and other information recorded by respondents to the family expenditure survey (FES). The estimates of those in receipt are derived from the annual statistical inquiry of supplementary benefit claimants.
2. The estimates relate only to people living in private households; families and persons in institutions are not sampled in the FES.
3. Estimates are subject to statistical error; all figures are rounded to the nearest 10,000.
4. Calculation of entitlement to supplementary benefit is based on the appropriate scale rates—ordinary for allowances and long-term for pensioners—with no allowance for additional requirements, except where heating additions would be automatically provided on age grounds. Disregards of income are allowed under the normal rules.
5. FES participants are not asked about the amount of capital they have, only about income received from capital, and assumptions have to be made from this information about capital holdings.
6. No entitlement to supplementary benefit is assumed if the family would be financially better off claiming housing rebates.
Pensioners
Direct comparisons cannot be made between the 1979 and 1981 figures. The 1979 entitlement was estimated without reference to heating additions because it could not be established from survey data whether such additions were appropriate. By 1981 heating additions for pensioners aged 70 and over had become automatic and were therefore taken into account in the calculation of entitlement. However, if the heating additions are excluded from the calculation, the increase in the take-up figures between 1979 and 1981 is seven percentage points—an increase in 1981 from 65 per cent. to 72 per cent. This represents a welcome improvement in take-up between the two dates.
Non-Pensioners
None of the changes in the estimated take-up percentage between 1979 and 1981 for non-pensioners, either as a whole or in the three separate categories shown, is statistically significant. Analysis of the characteristics of those with unclaimed entitlement suggests that non take-up of benefit may be due to the fact that potential claimants are in very short-term need or are living in reasonably well-off households. For instance, of sick and disabled non-claimants, 50 per cent. had jobs to return to; take-up by that group was negligible, compared with an estimated take-up of 80 per cent. among those with no job to return to. Of the unemployed with unclaimed entitlement, a third had been unemployed for four weeks or less. Over half of the sick and disabled and unemployed non-claimants were living in other people's households. These aspects are dealt with further in a paper prepared by DHSS statisticians for the Social Services Committee—"Take up of supplementary benefit—characteristics of non-claimants"—a copy of which is being placed in the Library.
Amount Of Benefit Unclaimed
Take-up tends to be higher as the amount of entitlement increases. The estimated proportion of benefit taken up in 1981–85 per cent.—was higher than the proportion of those entitled at any one time who actually claimed—71 per cent. With the exception of the sick and disabled group the average amount of unclaimed benefit increased between 1979 and 1981 at a faster rate than the rise in supplementary benefit scale rates. There were two reasons for this. First, housing costs increased ever the period at a faster rate than the scale rates. Secondly, there were changes in the family composition of the non-claimants; there were proportionately more married couples, who tend to be entitled to more benefit than single persons, in 1981. The reduction in the average amount of unclaimed benefit by the sick and disabled is also due to change in family composition; in 1981 a higher proportion of non-claimants were single people than in 1979.
Measures To Promote Take-Up
We continue to seek to promote take-up by issuing a claim form to all retirement pensioners and widows, all unemployed claimants and all sickness benefit claimants, and by co-operating as fully as possible at local level with well organised take-up campaigns mounted by local authorities.
As in 1979, the indications are that many of the pensioners with unclaimed entitlement in 1981 were receiving housing rebates or allowances. For them the changes made on the introduction of housing benefit should have subsequently improved the position. Local authorities have been given a formula which will enable them to identify housing benefit claimants who might also have entitlement to supplementary pensions or housing benefit supplement.
In December 1982 a new postal claim procedure was introduced for unemployed people to make it easier and more convenient for them to claim; this avoids the need for them to attend a social security office in person. We are setting up pilot schemes to assess the effect of extending the postal claims procedure to pensioners and other groups of claimants.
Hospital Waiting Times
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list the length of waiting time in each of the specialities at hospitals in the Bolton district health authority; how these waiting times compare with the other district health authorities in the North West region; and if he will publish in the Official Report a table of each speciality.
The information requested is not available centrally. I suggest the hon. Member writes to the chairman of the North Western regional health authority who may be able to give him the required information.
Bone Marrow Transplants
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how much has been spent by Her Majesty's Government for bone marrow transplants in the Mersey region since 1979 on an annual basis to the latest available date.
There has been one bone marrow transplant since 1979 in the Mersey region. This was in 1982 at a cost of £4,200. Arrangements have been made to sponsor a further 24 operations over the the next three years at a cost of £100,000, to be met from trust funds. A start should be made in early 1984.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what was the current waiting list for bone marrow transplants in the Mersey area health authority at the latest available date.
The information is not available centrally.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what was the average waiting time for those awaiting bone marrow transplants in the Mersey region at the latest date for which figures are available.
The requested information is not available centrally.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will establish bone marrow transplant facilities in the Mersey area health authority; and if he will make a statement.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Staffordshire Moorlands (Mr. Knox) on 2 November.—[Vol. 47, c. 456–457.
Housing Benefit (Scotland)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many council house, Scottish Special Housing Association, new town and private rented tenants are now receiving housing benefit in Scotland.
We estimate that there are approximately 550,000 local authority tenants, including tenants of the Scottish Special Housing Association and the new towns, and 60,000 private tenant receiving housing benefit in Scotland.
Camberwell Resettlement Unit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many (a) available bed spaces and (b) daily admissions of casuals, namely, non-residents, there were at the Camberwell resettlement unit during the month of November for the past 10 years.
Records of daily admissions are available only from 1978. The figures for that and subsequent years are as follows:
| Year | Bed spaces earmarked for casuals | Range of numbers of Daily Admissions for the month of November | |
| Minimum | Maximum | ||
| 1978 | 300 | 90 | 200 |
| 1979 | 300 | 83 | 232 |
| 1980 | 300 | 97 | 206 |
| 1981 | 300 | 76 | 163 |
| 1982 | 300 | 54 | 150 |
| 1983 | 100 | 45 | 123 |
| up to and including 27th | |||
Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Amendment Regulations 1983
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what was the cause of the urgency which led him to decide that it was inexpedient to refer the proposals contained in the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Amendment Regulations 1983 to the Social Security Advisory Committee.
As I explained in my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Cardiff, North (Mr. Jones) on 4 November—[Vol. 47, c. 485–86]—the effect of the regulations was to restore the legal position to what it had always, prior to a recent decision of the social security commissioners, been believed to be, that single payments of supplementary benefit should not be payable for medical or similar requirements. To have left the law unamended would have meant changing the policy intended by successive Governments and the former supplementary benefits commission. It was necessary to make the regulations urgently in order to keep to a minimum the number of claims which would need to be determined in accordance with the commissioners' decision and any uncertainty which would have resulted.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will withdraw the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Amendment Regulations 1983 until they have been considered by the Social Security Advisory Committee.
No.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what savings are expected to accrue in a year as a result of the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Amendment Regulations 1983
The regulations produce no savings as such, although an additional cost, the amount of which cannot be estimated, would have been likely to be incurred if they had not been made.
Christmas Bonus
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he is satisfied with the arrangements for payment of Christmas bonus in respect of retirement pensioners' wives who are aged over 60 years and not in receipt of either a retirement pension or a dependency addition.
Departmental instructions were clarified in 1981 and I am satisfied with the present arrangements. A very small number of such wives had claims wrongly turned down in earlier years and corrective action was taken in the cases identified. There is still a possibility that some may have been missed. If any do come to light, the Department would like to know about them and payment for any earlier years will be made where the non-payment was due to departmental error.
Overseas Personnel
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether his Department maintains, or supports the maintenance of, any offices or personnel abroad.
[pursuant to his reply, 17 November 1983, c. 569]: The final word of the given answer was in error. The correct reply should read as follows:
Yes. Currently the Department is maintaining the war pensions office at Dublin and the 25 personnel who work there. In addition, three officers maintained by the Department are working within the EC organisation in Brussels. Information about National Health Service personnel abroad is not held centrally.
Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs
El Salvador
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make representations to the Government of El Salvador concerning the whereabouts and welfare of three men connected with the national university of El Salvador; Pedro Flores Pena, a law student and member of the university council, Hugo Francisco Carrillo Cabrera, the head of foreign relations at the law faculty, and Amilcar Martinez Arguera, professor of foreign relations; all of whom have recently disappeared.
As these persons are Salvadorean nationals we have no consular standing to make representations to the Salvadorean authorities about them. We have nevertheless frequently made direct representations to these authorities to underline our concern at continuing human rights abuses in that country.
Military And Diplomatic Service (Boarding Education Allowances)
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the total Government expenditure for 1983–84 on allowances for the boarding education of the children of military and diplomatic personnel.
The total estimated cost to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office of boarding school allowances for all its personnel, including those in the communications division and the ODA, is £6,735,050 in 1983–84.Costs for children of military personnel are a question for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence.
Human Rights
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs to which countries Her Majesty's Government have made representations during the last year about breaches of human rights.
We have made representations about breaches of human rights to many countries during the last year and will continue to do so. It is often most effective to express such concerns privately. Any list we could publish would therefore given an incomplete and misleading picture.
Council Of Ministers
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will publish in the Official Report a statement of forthcoming business in the European Community Council of Ministers.
The usual written statement was deposited in the House earlier today. Heads of State and Government will meet at the European Council in Athens on 4 to 6 December. At present 12 meetings of the Council of Ministers are planned for December.Two Transport Councils are to be held in December. The Council meeting on 1 December is expected to consider a resolution on inland transport, a regulation on infrastructure support, the Community road haulage quota, hired vehicles, road haulage tariffs, vehicle weights and dimensions, negotiations between the Community and Austria, Greek frontier traffic and Community air transport policy. The Council meeting on 20 December is expected to consider two shipping matters—the application of the treaty's competition articles to shipping and the resolution on relations with third countries—and recommendations concerning the railways in the Community, as well as any business left over from the 1 December meeting.The Labour and Social Affairs Council is due to meet on 8 December to discuss a draft recommendation on working time, a draft resolution on youth employment, a proposal on social aspects of the Greek memorandum, and the draft Vredeling directive.The Consumer Affairs Council will meet on 12 December to discuss an early warning system for dangerous consumer products, and the draft directives on misleading advertising, doorstep selling and product liability.The Economic and Finance Council is expected to meet on 12 December to adopt the annual report on the economic situation in the Community. Ministers might also consider EMS interest rate subsidies, the Community loan mechanism designed to support the balance of payments of member states, the promotion of the financial integration of the European Community, and the Commission proposal on the financing of European innovation loans.The Agriculture Council is next expected to meet on 12–13 December to consider agricultural structures which include aids for investment in agricultural holdings, measures for forestry and the protection of the environment. It is also expected to consider extensions for less favoured areas, New Zealand butter quotas and the Commission report on the sheepmeat regime.The Research Council is due to meet on 13 December. It will consider non-nuclear energy research and development, structures and procedures for management of R and D programmes, ESPRIT, two aspects of the joint research centre—its programme and its board of governors, and two aspects of fission—the decommissioning of nuclear plants and reactor safety. It might also discuss industrial technology.The Fisheries Council is next expected to meet on 14 December to consider herring quotas, 1983 total allowable catches—TACs—and third country arrangements.The Steel Council is expected to meet on 14 December to continue its discussion on new short-term measures for steel.The Environment Council is due to meet on 16 December to consider a draft regulation on the supervision and control of transfrontier shipment of hazardous wastes and a draft directive on the discharge of mercury into the aquatic environment.The Energy Council is expected to meet on 19 December to continue its discussions on the solid fuels initiative, including coking coal, and on energy demonstration projects.The Foreign Affairs Council will meet on 19–20 December when Ministers are expected to consider measures needed to follow up the conclusions reached at the Athens European Council and a report on the latest state of the negotiations for Greenland's withdrawal from full membership of the Community. Ministers will also be asked to approve a negotiating position for the ministerial meeting with Spain which is due to take place in the margins of the Council.In addition, the Council may discuss the arrangements for determining the Community's annual food aid programme, and continue its discussions of the state of negotiations on the renewal of the European Community/China textiles agreement, and of a supplementary import quota for newsprint for 1983.
Special And Foreign Affairs Councils
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the outcome of the Special and Foreign Affairs Councils of 28 and 29 November.
With my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer I represented the United Kingdom at the Special Council which met in Brussels on 28–29 November. The Foreign Affairs Council on 29 November was attended by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, my right hon. Friend the Minister for Trade and my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Department of Trade and Industry.This was the last meeting of the Special Council before next week's European Council. Discussion centred on trying to narrow down the list of essential points on which Heads of Government need to take decisions. These relate primarily to the control of Community expenditure, including agricultural spending and to the correction of budgetary inequities. Interesting new proposals for an effective mechanism for controlling Community expenditure were tabled by the French Government. On budgetary imbalances, some progress was made in establishing the framework in which decisions must be taken. I again made clear that agreement on a package of decisions at Athens must depend upon our being satisfied on overall control of expenditure including agricultural spending and on a solution to the present budget inequity. There as further discussion on new Community policies as well as on the structural funds. These subjects, along with the main issues under discussion, will be incorporated in a Presidency text for submission to Heads of Government.Given the limited time available after the Special Council for discussion of Foreign Affairs Council business, steel issues—the Commission's proposals for negotiating the renewal of voluntary restraint arrangements for steel imports from third countries in 1984, and for short-term measures for steel, including mandatory minimum prices, and also the problem of United States measures against special steel imports—were discussed at a separate session within the framework of the Foreign Affairs Council. This session is the subject of a separate reply by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry to my hon. Friend the Member for Staffordshire, South-East (Mr. Lightbown).In the general session of the Council, Ministers considered progress in the negotiations for Greenland's withdrawal from the Community. It was agreed that every effort should be made to ensure rapid progress towards a mutually satisfactory agreement. The Council will discuss this further in December.Ministers reviewed the progress on a number of proposals submitted by the Commission designed to meet the demands made in the Greek memorandum of 19 March 1982. Not all the proposals foreshadowed by the Commission at the European Council at Stuttgart in June have yet been submitted. Further work is needed on those that have before they will be ready for decision.The Council discussed the working of the EC/Cyprus association agreement in the light of the Turkish Cypriot declaration of statehood. It was agreed that a Commission delegation should visit Nicosia for discussions with the Government of Cyprus.Ministers agreed that the EC/ACP ministerial meeting, which had been scheduled for December, should be postponed until early in 1984. They also agreed on the admission to the Lomé sugar protocol of the Ivory Coast and on the restoration of a preferential sugar quota to India. Agreement by the Council on the Commission's proposal for a supplementary import quota for newsprint for 1983—a matter of particular importance to British users of newsprint—was prevented by the continued opposition of one member state. The issue will be considered further by the Committee of Permanent Representatives, where we shall continue to press urgently for a decision.Ministers noted the measures announced by the Japanese Government to stimulate domestic demand and appreciated the will to encourage imports that these measures represented, but remained profoundly concerned by the continued deterioration in the balance of trade between the Community and Japan. Ministers also noted the assurances of moderation given by Japan concerning the export of certain sensitive products to the EC in 1984, and agreed that they would need to be monitored closely.The Council approved the Commission's proposal to increase the tariff on digital audio discs. It reaffirmed the importance it attached to the international declarations on the rollback of protectionist measures, considered that the Commission proposal had substantial merits and expected to take a decision at an early opportunity after further consideration at official level.Ministers reconfirmed the Commission's negotiating mandate for the renewal of the textiles agreement with China.The Council agreed declarations on agriculture and social affairs which were presented to the Portugese at a ministerial meeting in the margins of the Council.
Defence
Cruise
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if military instructions for the use of weapons by United States troops guarding cruise missiles are the same as those applying to United Kingdom troops in similar circumstances.
Yes.
Territorial Army
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will seek to ensure that a member of the Territorial Army is not liable to be made redundant by his employer as a result of attendance at annual camp.
I do not believe this is necessary. Happily, the vast majority of employers are sympathetic towards releasing employees for training with the Territorial Army. However, a member of the Territorial Army might risk dismissal if he takes time off work without his employer's consent in order to attend annual camp. In such circumstances the Territorial Army member may be able to seek redress through an industrial tribunal under the terms of the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978, depending upon the individual circumstances.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will seek to ensure that a member of the Territorial Army does not become liable to expulsion from his trade union as a result of attendance at annual camp.
I am not aware of any instances of Territoral Army members being expelled from their union because of attendance at annual camp. If my hon. Friend has details, I will be glad to consider them.
Ships (Disposal)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will give a revised list of Her Majesty's ships and Royal Fleet Auxiliaries due for disposal in the period up to the end of 1986.
Plans for the withdrawal of ships from the active fleet are kept under review. On current plans, however, the following ships of the Royal Navy and Royal Fleet Auxiliary are to be withdrawn from the active fleet during 1984 and 1985:
| 1984 | |||
| Royal Navy | |||
| GURKHA | — | Tribal Class Frigate | |
| TARTAR | — | Tribal Class Frigate | |
| ZULU | — | Tribal Class Frigate | |
| LONDONDERRY | — | Rothesay Class Frigate | |
| ANTRIM | — | County Class Destroyer | |
| FALMOUTH | — | Rothesay Class Frigate | |
| BEACHAMPTON | — | Coastal Patrol Craft | |
| CROFTON | — | Coastal Minesweeper | |
| WASPERTON | — | Coastal Patrol Craft | |
| WOTTON | — | Coastal Minesweeper | |
| YARNTON | — | Coastal Patrol Craft | |
| WATERWITCH | — | Tender to University | |
| Royal Navy Unit | |||
| WOODLARK | — | Tender to University | |
| Royal Navy Unit | |||
| 1985 | |||
| Royal Navy | |||
| AJAX | — | Leander Class Frigate | |
| BERWICK | — | Rothesay Class Frigate | |
| LOWESTOFT | — | Rothesay Class Frigate | |
| PLYMOUTH | — | Rothesay Class Frigate | |
| ROTHESAY | — | Rothesay Class Frigate | |
| TORQUAY | — | Type 12 Frigate | |
| LEWISTON | — | Coastal Miiesweeper | |
| MONKTON | — | Coastal Patrol Craft | |
| SHAVINGTON | — | Coastal Minesweeper | |
| UPTON | — | Coastal Minesweeper | |
| WOLVERTON | — | Coastal Patrol Craft | |
| ECHO | — | Inshore Survey Craft | |
| EGERIA | — | Inshore Survey Craft | |
| ENTERPRISE | — | Inshore Survey Craft | |
| Royal Fleet Auxiliary | |||
| PEARLEAF | — | Support Tanker | |
| SIR LAMORAK | — | Logistic Landing Ship | |
Departmental Staff
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what were the manpower levels in his Department in June 1983; and what are his plans.
United Kingdom-based staff in post at the nearest date for the quarterly manpower count was 206,403 at 1 July 1983. This figure includes 18,609 staff employed in the royal ordnance factories. No specific figure is planned for June 1984. But we aim to achieve, or better, the planned manpower figures of 200,000 at 1 April 1984 and 179,000 at 1 April 1985. The reduction of 21,000 in 1984–85 includes the removal of the royal ordnance factory organisation from the Department's strength—about 18,500 staff—following the change to Companies Act status during the course of the year.In addition to the United Kingdom-based staff at 1 July 1983 the Department employed 33,841 locally engaged civilians overseas; no significant changes are expected to this number over the next 12 months.
Dartmoor Steering Group (Report)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish the fourth annual report of the Dartmoor steering group.
I have today placed a copy of this report in the Library. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment and I are glad to express the Government's appreciation of the steering group's work. The military use of parts of Dartmoor remains a contentious issue, and the steering group provides an important forum in which the interested parties may seek, as far as practicable, to reconcile the needs of the armed forces with those of conservation. My right hon. Friend and I will continue to examine whether there are ways the Government may assist to this end.
Falklands Airport
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the ownership of the site on which the Falklands airport is being built; and what contractual agreement Her Majesty's Government has with the owners.
The land for the new airfield is being purchased by the Crown from the Falkland Islands Company. The contractual agreement will be the contract of sale.