Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 58: debated on Thursday 26 April 1984

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Thursday 26 April 1984

Prime Minister

Engagements

Q6.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q7.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q8.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q9.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q10.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q11.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

Q12.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q13.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q14.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q15.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

Q16.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q17.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q18.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q19.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q20.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q21.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q22.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q23.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q24.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

Q25.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q26.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q27.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q28.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

Q29.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q30.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q31.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

Q32.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q33.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q34.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q35.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

Q36.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q37.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q38.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q39.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q40.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

Q41.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

Q42.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q43.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q44.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q45.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q46.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q47.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

Q48.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q49.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q52.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q53.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

Q55.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q56.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q57.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q58.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q59.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q60.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q61.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

Q62.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q63.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q64.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q65.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

Q66.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

Q67.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 26 April.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 26 April.

This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in the House I shall be having further meetings later today.

Cornhill

Q50.

asked the Prime Minister if she will make an official visit to Cornhill in the area of the Banff and Buchan district.

Staffordshire

Q51.

asked the Prime Minister if she has any plans to pay an official visit to Staffordshire.

New Ireland Forum

Q68.

asked the Prime Minister if she intends to discuss the report of the New Ireland Forum with the Prime Minister of the Republic of Ireland.

The report of the New Ireland Forum has not yet been published, and the Government of the Republic of Ireland have made no proposals for discussions based upon it.

Housing (Wales)

asked the Prime Minister what special factors lead to expenditure on housing in Wales being proportionately less than in other parts of the United Kingdom.

The allocation of provision to individual services within the Wales "block" is a matter for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales.There is no necessary relationship between the levels of spending on a particular service in different parts of the United Kingdom.However, since 1979–80 on a per capita basis total net capital expenditure on housing in Wales has been broadly comparable to that in England, though less than that in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Manpower Services Commission

asked the Prime Minister if she has any plans to merge the Manpower Services Commission with the Departments responsible for education; and if she will make a statement.

There are no plans to merge the Manpower Services Commission with the Department of Education and Science. We do not believe that such a further change in the structure of Government is required. Good communications already exist between the Department of Employment, the Department of Education and Science and the Manpower Services Commission. As we announced in the recently published White Paper "Training for Jobs" these will be further strengthened in the future.

Falkland Islands

asked the Prime Minister if Her Majesty's Government will allow Argentine fishermen to resume fishing in the near future in their traditional fishing grounds around the Falkland Islands; and if she will make a statement.

When the Falkland Islands protection zone was established, on 22 July 1982, it was made clear that Argentine warships and military aircraft should not enter the zone; Argentine civil aircraft and shipping were requested not to do so, unless with our prior agreement. No such agreement has been sought.

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Prime Minister what steps she has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by the Cabinet Office and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

The Cabinet Office took part in the surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon announced by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury in the House on 24 March 1983, at column 461. The Department's policies and procedures were reviewed before the CRE's code of practice became operative, and additional guidance and instructions have been issued. Equal opportunity officers have also been designated within the Department. We shall consider further action once the results of these surveys have been evaluated. The kind of positive action which the code recommends can be undertaken only where under-representation can be demonstrated.

Security Commission (Bettaney Inquiry)

asked the Prime Minister what terms of reference are being given to the Security Commission for its inquiry into the Bettaney case.

The terms of reference are:

"To investigate the circumstances in which breaches of security have or may have occurred arising out of the case of Michael John Bettaney, who was found guilty on 16 April 1984, of offences under the Official Secrets Act 1911; and to advise in the light of that investigation whether any change in security arrangements is necessary or desirable."
Unemployed claimants
9 February 19848 March 1984
MalesFemalesTotalMalesFemalesTotal
(a) Scotland242,296108,800351,096236,315106,991343,306
(b) Edinburgh travel-to-work area22,98910,69333,68222,46310,44632,929

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people were unemployed in (a) Scotland and (b) the Edinburgh travel-to-work area in February and March 1984, respectively; and what are the corresponding figures for men and women.

Unemployment percentage rates
9 February 19848 March 1984
MalesFemalesTotalMalesFemalesTotal
(a) Scotland18·711·615·718·311·415·4
(b) Edinburgh travel-to-work area14·38·411·714·08·311·4

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people have been unemployed for (a) over 26 weeks and (b) over 52 weeks at the latest available date in Scotland and the Edinburgh travel-to-work area, respectively; and what are the corresponding figures for men and women.

The information is not available in the precise form requested. The following table shows the number of unemployed claimants by duration of unemployment in Scotland and in the Edinburgh travel-to-work area at 12 January 1984, the latest date for which information is available in this detail.

Unemployment at 12 January 1984
MalesFemalesTotal
Scotland
26–52 weeks42,32624,17266,498
over 52 weeks99,62829,517129,145

British Airways

asked the Prime Minister if she will publish a record of correspondence, notes of discussions and other documentation to which British Airways was party concerning the arrangements for dealing with the British Airways pension scheme consequent upon privatisation.

Scotland

Labour Statistics

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people were unemployed in (a) Scotland and (b) the Edinburgh travel-to-work area in February and March 1984, respectively; and what are the corresponding figures for men and women.

The information is set out in the following table.

MalesFemalesTotal
Edinburgh travel-to-work area
26–52 weeks4,3162,3146,630
over 52 weeks8,7302,58811,318

Drug Addiction

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many official National Health Service rehabilitation centres presently exist in (a) Edinburgh, (b) Leith and (c) Scotland generally, which deal with the drug addiction problem; and how many are planned for the future by the National Health Service.

There are no officially designated National Health Service rehabilitation centres in Scotland which deal with the drug addiction problem. Drug addicts are normally referred to consultant psychiatrists who see, assess, treat and rehabilitate them on an outpatient or day patient basis. Each consultant psychiatrist has one or two beds which are used for addicts who require inpatient treatment for short periods. Drug addicts in Edinburgh and Leith are mainly referred to the Royal Edinburgh hospital for treatment and addicts in the rest of Scotland to their nearest NHS premises providing psychiatric treatment.

Fluoridation

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether he will name the fluorides which he is considering permitting authorities in Scotland to put in public water supplies.

I cannot anticipate what the proposed legislation on fluoridation of public water supplies might contain about fluorides. I understand that the compounds used previously in Scotland and in use in England and Wales are hexafluorosilicic acid H2 Si F6 and sodium hexafluorosilicate Na2 Si F6.

Drug Addicts

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland which hospitals in the west of Scotland have the facilities for the treatment of drug addicts.

All mental illness hospitals in the west of Scotland have facilities for the assessment, and where appropriate, the treatment of drug addicts.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many drug addicts under the age of 20 years have been treated in hospitals by year, since 1979; and what percentage of the total number of drug addicts treated this represents.

The number of admissions of persons under the age of 20 years to mental illness hospitals and psychiatric units in Scotland with a principal diagnosis of drug dependence for the years 1979 to 1982 (the latest year for which the information is available centrally) and the percentage of the total number of admissions of drug addicts this represents was:

NumberPer cent.
19793720
19803017
19814326
1982*3214
* Provisional figures.
Information is not available centrally about the number of drug addicts who have been treated as outpatients.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many drug addicts have been treated in hospitals, by year, since 1979.

The number of admissions to mental illness hospitals and psychiatric units in Scotland with a principal diagnosis of drug dependence for the years 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1982 (the latest year for which the information is available centrally) was 181, 179, 168 and 226 respectively. The 1982 figure is provisional. Information is not available centrally about the number of drug addicts who have been treated as outpatients.

Scott Lithgow (Surplus Land)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will give an assurance that Inverclyde district council and Strathclyde regional council will be consulted with regard to any plans Trafalgar House may have for land surplus to the requirements of the Scott Lithgow business.

At the request of my right hon. Friend, the Scottish Development Agency is discussing with Trafalgar House the possible acquisition of any land surplus to Scott Lithgow's requirements with a view to the initiation of measures to help the Inverclyde economy, in which the agency will be co-operating fully with the local authorities and other interests.

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what steps he has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

A statement on procedures and policies on race relations within the Civil Service has already been circulated throughout my Department. An equal opportunities officer has been designated within the Department but no ethnic monitoring has been undertaken. Copies of the commission's code of practice will shortly be distributed to personnel management staff in my Department. Future action on ethnic monitoring will be considered once the surveys carried out in the north-west and Avon have been evaluated. The kind of positive action which the code recommends is appropriate only where under-representation can be demonstrated.

Social Services

Drugs (Parallel Imports)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what savings will result from his plans to control the parallel importation of drugs into the United Kingdom;(2) what studies of the effects on investment, employment and the balance of payments were undertaken by his Department before he announced Her Majesty's Government's policy on parallel drug imports.

My right hon. Friend's announcement on 5 April in reply to a question from my hon. Friend the Member for Northampton, South (Mr. Morris), at columns 647–48, was concerned solely with plans to ensure the safety of imported medicines. It is very unlikely that any savings to public funds will accrue directly from the exercise of the proposed controls as the present practice of parallel importing does not involve any additional cost to public funds. We consider the effects on investment and employment in the British pharmaceutical industry and on the balance of payments whenever we make any policy changes in this area together with the interests of the taxpayer as customer and the paramount importance of patient safety.

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what steps he has taken, since the coining into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

The Department took part in the surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon announced by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury in the House on 24 March 1983, at column 461. The Department's policies and procedures were reviewed before the Commission for Racial Equality's code of practice became operative and additional guidance and instructions have been issued. Equal opportunity officers have also been designated within the Department. We shall consider further action once the results of these surveys have been evaluated.The kind of positive action which the code recommends can be undertaken only where under-representation can be demonstrated.

Single Payments Scheme

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he has any plans to amend the regulations governing single payments for essential furniture and household equipment.

When the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payment) Regulations were consolidated in 1981, the wording of what is now regulation 10(1)(b) was changed with the intention of clarifying the effect of the regulation concerning the circumstances in which single payments for essential furniture and household equipment could be made to supplementary benefit claimants. A recent decisron of a social security commissioner has ruled that the effect of the regulation in force before 1981 was different from what it was believed and intended to be at the time, that the effect of the regulation was therefore unintentionally changed on consolidation, and that the current regulation is invalid to the extent of that change. My right hon. Friend has therefore today laid before Parliament the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Regulations 1984, which restore what was originally intended to be the effect of this provision, as reflected in the wording of the current consolidated regulations. These regulations will come into effect on 27 April 1984 and are today being referred to the Social Security Advisory Committee under the provisions of section 10(7) of the Social Security Act 1980. The committee will report on them to my right hon. Friend in due course.

Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

Milk

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) if he has decided on the percentage of the national milk productivity quota to keep back for hardship cases and on the method of allocation to hardship cases and their right of appeal;(2) if he has now decided on what yearly production will be the basis for calculating farm quotas on milk production under the new European Economic Community system.

Difficult decisions have had to be taken to bring the Community milk surplus under control. Despite the efforts to restrain the milk surplus, including such earlier measures as the co-responsibility levy, milk production in the Community has continued to outrun consumption. Unless something had been done immediately, milk deliveries to dairies in 1984 could have been expected to rise to over 106 million tonnes. At the same time, consumption looked like being only about 86 million tonnes. This substantial surplus is extremely cosily to get rid of and the markets for it are very limited indeed The aim of the supplementary levy is to cut back the deliveries to dairies over the next 12 months to just under 100 million tonnes. In the discussions leading up to this decision the United Kingdom pressed the case for price cuts to right the balance of the market and to stimulate consumption. None the less, I do not think we should underestimate the difficulties that this course of action, supported by the MMB, would have caused. There is no painless solution to an acute surplus problem. However, most Community countries were opposed to the size of price cut that would have been necessary and a supplementary levy and quota scheme as proposed by the Commission was the only possible alternative. It had been under detailed consideration in Brussels since July last year and subject to extensive discussion in Parliament and with the interests concerned. As adopted by the Council the scheme provides for a higher ceiling for quotas in the first year. To have extended the transitional period would have greatly increased the financial cost of the surplus production. As it is, it has been necessary to increase the co-responsibility levy to finance the extra disposal costs involved.The decisions taken in the Council of Ministers lay down the main framework of the new quota scheme, but a number of important details have still to be settled. These are being discussed urgently in the management committee in Brussels and officials are keeping in close touch with representatives of the industry and the trade. In the meantime I have sent all milk producers a note (a copy of which I have placed in the Library) explaining as fully as possible at this stage how the scheme will work.In England and Wales the Milk Marketing Board will be responsible for implementing the supplementary levy, both for those producers who sell their milk to the board and for those who sell direct. The board has sent to each individual producer who sells direct to the board an indication of his provisional initial quota, together with an indication of how the board will administer the scheme. In England and Wales a reserve of some 2·5 per cent of the total MMB quota will be set aside to make some allowance for special cases and, after making allowance for that, the average producer selling through the MMB will be given an initial provisional quota 9 per cent. less than his 1983 deliveries.Those producers who sell milk direct will be notified of their individual provisional quotas as soon as the relevant details have been settled in Brussels.

Imports (Tariffs And Levies)

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, whether he will publish in the Official Report a table showing imports into the European Economic Community and the United State of America respectively of milk products, cotton, sugar and groundnuts, together with the quotas and tariffs levies applicable in each case.

The information requested on volumes of imports into the European Community and the United States is shown for 1982 in the following table.

SITC headingEuropean Community imports 000 tonnesUnited States imports 000 tonnes
Butter0231091
Cheese024104115
Milk powder022·4232
022·43
Condensed milk022·4923
Sugar (white sugar equivalent)611,3632,372
Groundnuts2223541

Sources: EC. Eurostat; US, FAO and UN.

All these items enter the Community free of duty. Variable levies are payable on milk products and sugar; these are set to reflect the difference between Community and third country offer prices.

A reduced rate of levy applies to a specific quantity of butter imported from New Zealand; the volume fixed for 1982 was 92,000 tonnes. Similarly reduced rates of levy applied in 1982 on up to 34,200 tonnes of certain cheeses imported from specific third countries. In addition, unlimited access to the European Community market, at reduced rates of levy, is allowed for certain cheeses from various third countries.

Under protocol No. 7 of the ACP/EEC convention, specific quantities of sugar which originate in certain ACP states are imported free of levy. The total annual quantity of sugar covered by this arrangement, is 1·3 million tonnes white sugar equivalent. A wide range of tariffs and quantitative restrictions apply to imports into the United States. Rates of duty can vary according to source, size of consignment, date of importation and for other reasons: details are contained in the "Tariff schedules of the United States (1984)" but these cover many pages and could not reasonably be reproduced.

Trade policy on cotton is a matter for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry.

European Community (Production Targets)

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether he will publish

Application of guarantee threshold in cereals, rapseed (colza) and milk
Cereals
Marketing yearThreshold figure Threshold adjusted for imports of cereal substituties Three year production average Action triggered by scheme at beginning of next marketing year
million tonnesmillion tonnesmillion tonnes
1982–83119·50119·50120·851 per cent, abatement of intervention and reference prices in 1983–84.
1983–84120·61121·98120·93None.

in the Official Report a table showing the production targets referred to in paragraph 36 of the 1983 "Report on the Agricultural Situation in the Community", the amount actually produced and the reducton in prices made in cases where production exceeded the target.

The information on "production targets" concerning cereals, rapeseed (colza) and on milk is as follows:

Cereals

In the "Guidelines for European Agriculture" of 23 October 1981 the Commission invisaged a medium-term production objective of 130 million tonnes for all cereals in 1988–89. This figure has most recently been revised to 126 million tonnes in 1989–90 for all cereals excluding durum wheat.
With effect from the 1982–83 marketing year a guarantee threshold scheme was introduced for all cereals other than durum wheat. This involves the setting of a short-term production target—or guarantee threshold—against which average production in the three most recent years is compared. For each million tonnes by which the production average exceeds the threshold, intervention and reference prices are abated in the following year by 1 per cent. up to a maximum of 5 per cent. The threshold itself is, however, increased by the amount, if any, by which imports of cereals substitutes exceed 15 million tonnes in the year preceding that in which it is fixed. Details of thresholds, average production and the effects of the scheme are shown in the table below.

Rapeseed

With effect from the 1982–83 marketing year a guarantee threshold scheme was introduced for rapeseed. Details are given in the following table. The Commission's price proposal for 1983–84 was for an increase of 5·5 per cent. but less 1 per cent. (that is an increase of 4·5 per cent.) as a result of the application of the guarantee threshold. The outcome of the CAP price-fixing for 1983–84 was lower still, at 4 per cent. The Commission's price proposal for 1984–85 was for an increase of 1 per cent. but less 2 per cent. (that is an increase of - 1 per cent.) as a result of the application of the guarantee threshold. The outcome of the CAP price fixing for 1984–85 was lower still, at—2 per cent.

Milk

With effect from the 1982–83 marketing year a guarantee threshold scheme was introduced for milk. Details are given in the following table. The Commission's final price proposal for 1983–84 was for an increase of 5·5 per cent. in the target price for milk and the prices for products going into intervention, but less about 3 per cent. (that is an increase of 2·33 per cent.) as a result of the application of the guarantee threshold. A quota -supplementary levy scheme has been introduced with effect from the beginning of the 1984–85 marketing year. Full details of these measures and of prices for 1984–85 for all commodities covered by the CAP will be contained in a note by my Department, a copy of which will be deposited shortly in the Library of the House.

Rapeseed

Marketing year

Threshold figure

Three year production average

Action triggered by scheme at beginning of next marketing year

million tonnes

million tonnes

1982–832·152·221 per cent, abatement of intervention and target price proposed;1½ per cent, abatement realised.
1983–842·292·412 per cent, abatement of intervention and target price proposed; 3 per cent, abatement realised.

Milk

Marketing year

Threshold figure

Deliveries

Action triggered by scheme at beginning of next marketing year

million tonnes

million tonnes

1982–8396·899·73 per cent, abatement of target and intervention prices.
1983–8497·2103·7Introduction of quota—supplementary levy.

Sugar

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when the quota system for sugar was introduced; what are the quotas for each country in the European Economic Community; and if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing production and consumption of sugar in each country each year since the quotas were introduced, together with the amount exported from the European Economic Community as a whole to third countries.

Quotas were included in regulation (EEC) 1009/67 of 21 December 1967 and applied from the

Table A
'000 metre tonnes white sugar equivalent
YearDenmarkFederal Republic of GermanyFranceGreeceIrelandItalyNetherlandsBelgium-LuxembourgUnited KingdomTotal
1968–693141,8192,625881621,1856625268978,278
1969–702791,9082,9391341431,2657046198618,852
1970–712681,8922,8601731411,0956575519068,543
1971–722992,1563,2281421731,1537727721,0869,781
1972–733152,0423,1121181571,1846966168869,126
1973–743382,2583,2591461771,0377667189639,662
1974–753822,2463,0361721349307165585688,742
1975–763902,3373,3092821871,3398416596419,985
1976–773832,5153,0853551741,60687067469610,358
1977–785202,8304,2622711681,24783272894911,807
1978–794072,7584,1173261881,5019518301,02212,100
1979–804532,8474,3312931751,5628539141,15412,582
1980–814272,7494,2051741481,7798757991,10612,262
1981–824803,3965,4473231682,0481,0441,0301,09215,028
1982–835373,2994,7552962221,1801,1301,1051,41813,942
1983–84*3462,5063,8352971961,2457427821,06311,012
*Provisional.

Source: EC Commission.

1968–69 marketing year. The current quotas for each country in the European Community are set out in Regulation (EEC) No. 1785/81, which appeared in the Official Journal of the European Communities No. L 177/4 of 1 July 1981. Production of sugar in each of the current member states since quotas were introduced is shown in table "A".

Table "B" shows the consumption of sugar in each of the current member states over the same period.

Table "C" shows total exports of sugar from the European Community to third countries in the same period.

Table B

'000 metric tonnes white sugar equivalent

Year

Denmark

Federal Republic of Germany

France

Greece

Ireland

Italy

Netherlands

Belgium-Luxembourg

United Kingdom

Total

July-June

1968–692422,0471,7701591351,4217123562,6769,518
1969–702472,0431,8791671361,4536683672,7229,682
1970–712522,1412,0701761391,5276693432,72310,040
1971–722462,1141,8071801471,5236073462,6489,618
1972–732512,0911,9042231461,5836123512,6159,776

October-September

1973–742392,2352,1252461501,8276334152,79010,660
1974–752372,1751,9782461341,6476103582,4229,807
1975–762602,1512,0282271431,7036083352,3079,762
1976–771772,0521,8372551471,5125763152,4209,291
1977–781982,2101,9312701511,6555633292,4449,751
1978–791982,2171,9792801501,7515763362,3379,824
1979–801862,1821,9923101451,6785743462,3119,724
1980–811952,2121,9512981381,6275613512,2119,544
1981–822032,2771,9902751431,5055643572,2839,597
1982–83*1962,1931,9382771371,5205683652,3089,502

*Provisional.

Source: EC Commission.

Table 'C

'000 metric tonnes

(white sugar equivalent)

Year

*Total

July-June

EC 6

1968–69737
1969–70727
1970–71932
1971–721,521
1972–731,307

Oct-Sept

EC 9

1973–741,232
1974–75329
1975–761,637
1976–771,898
1977–783,706
1978–793,529
1979–804,073
1980–814,872

EC 10

1981–825,473
1982–83†5,540

* Includes sugar exported in processed products.

† Provisional.

Source: EC Commission.

Dairy Industry

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many farmers came into dairying in the two 12 months periods, 1 October 1981 to 1 October 1982 and 1 October 1982 to 1 October 1983; and how many cows this represents.

No information is available on the number of new entrants into dairying nor how many cows this might represent.

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many farmers went out of dairying in the two 12-month periods, 1 October 1981 to 1 October 1982 and 1 October 1982 to 1 October 1983; and how many cows this represents.

The information required is not available in the form requested. The only details available relate to numbers of dairy holdings and the numbers of dairy cows on them. This information as at the June census for England and Wales is as follows:

YearNumber of Dairy HoldingsNumber of Dairy Cows
198147,1692,637,869
198245,8332,683,540
198345,2972,744,597

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what steps he has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

My Department took part in the surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon announced by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury in the House on 24 March 1983, at column 465. My Department's policies and procedures were reviewed before CRE's code of practice became operative, and additional guidance and instructions have been issued. Equal opportunity officers have also been designated within the department. We shall consider further action once the results of these surveys have been evaluated. The kind of positive action which the code recommends can be undertaken only where under-representation can be demonstrated.

Correspondence

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many letters which have been with his Department for four, six, eight, 10 and over 12 weeks, respectively, as at 10 April and which were from Members of Parliament remain without substantive replies from his Department.

[pursuant to his reply, 25 April 1984]: At 10 April 1984, five letters sent to my Department from Members of Parliament had not received substantive replies. Of these, three had been with the Department for four weeks and two for six weeks. At 24 April only two of these remained without substantive replies.

Transport

Civil Air Transport (Review)

asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he plans to implement any recommendations by the Civil Aviation Authority in its review of civil air transport in advance of receiving the inspector's report on Stansted; and if he will make a statement.

I cannot say in advance of receiving the authority's report on its review when we might implement any recommendations.

Harbour Development Control (Abolition)

asked the Secretary of State for Transport what consultations he has had with representatives of port workers concerning his proposal to repeal section 9 of the Harbours Act 1964; and if he will make a statement.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport what representations he has received objecting to the proposed repealing of section 9 of the Harbours Act 1964.

Very few. I have received one letter from the British Ports Association and another from the General Council of British Shipping, both favouring the retention by the Government of their powers under section 9, but each proposing that only sparing use should be made of them. I have also noted the motion on the Order Paper in the name of the hon. Member and other hon. and right hon. Members.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport, before he lays the order to revoke the control of harbour development orders which give effect to section 9 of the Harbours Act 1964, if he will meet a deputation of hon. Members representing port areas and trade union representatives as a matter of urgency.

The Control of Harbour Development (Revocation) Order 1984 was laid on 17 April but is subject to the annulment procedure by virtue of section 54(2) of the Harbours Act 1964. I am willing to meet a deputation of hon. Members and trade union representatives at any time.

Falmouth Container Terminal

asked the Secretary of State for Transport if there has been any recent application to construct a container terminal at Falmouth; and if he will make a statement.

Falmouth Container Terminal Ltd. reapplied for authorisation under section 9 of the Harbours Act 1964 on 7 October last.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what effect the construction of a container terminal at Falmouth will have on the port of Liverpool;(2) if he will estimate the effects of the construction of a container terminal at Falmouth on the port of London.

If it were to be constructed, the effect of a container terminal at Falmouth on other ports would depend on how much, and what type of traffic it secures, where such traffic comes from and on the competitiveness of any such container terminal.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what new traffic is expected to be attracted to any proposed new development of the Falmouth container terminal;(2) what evidence he has received that any new traffic will be attracted to any proposed container terminal at Falmouth.

Falmouth Container Terminal Ltd. has provided us, in confidence, with information on its assessment of the potential use of its proposed terminal. It would not be proper for me either to disclose or to comment on that information.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport if the Falmouth Container Terminal Ltd. has made any application under the European regional development fund and section 8 of the Railways Act 1974 for financial assistance towards any application to construct a container terminal at Falmouth.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport what is the estimated total cost of the construction of a container terminal at Falmouth.

The estimated cost quoted by Falmouth Container Terminal Ltd. in its Harbours Act reapplication of October 1983 was £71 million.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many jobs will be created by the development of a container terminal at Falmouth.

The promoters have estimated upwards of 200 jobs inside the terminal with spin-off effects in the locality.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport if any public money will be given towards any proposed new road network if a container terminal is constructed at Falmouth.

It is too soon to speculate what needs might arise if and when this terminal is built. Expenditure by county councils on new roads is eligible for transport supplementary grant. It would be for the Cornwall county council to decide whether to include any new road in the transport policy and programme it submits to my right hon. Friend each year. The promoters of the terminal envisage that most of the traffic will be transhipped by sea or carried by rail to inland destinations.

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for Transport what steps he has taken since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

My Department took part in the surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon announced by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury in the House on 24 March 1983 at column 461. We shall consider further action, once the results of these surveys have been evaluated. The kind of positive action the code recommends can be undertaken only where under-representation can be demonstrated. My Department's policies and procedures were reviewed before the CRE's code of practice became operative. An equal opportunity officer has also been designated within my Department.

Orange Badge Scheme

asked the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the answer of 3 April, Official Report, column 441–2, to the hon. Member for Glanford and Scunthorpe, if he has any plans to review eligibility rules for the orange badge scheme.

This would be premature for the reason stated in the reply I gave my hon. Friend on 9 April at column 27.

Ballycastle (Coastguard Station)

asked the Secretary of State for Transport why the coastguard station at Ballycastle is not manned during adverse weather conditions; whether there is another permanently manned station on that part of the coast; how long it takes to have the Ballycastle station manned when an incident occurs; and what assurances he can give to the inhabitants of Rathlin island regarding their safety should they be caught by adverse weather while crossing to or from the mainland of Northern Ireland.

[pursuant to the reply, Wednesday 25 April 1984, c. 520]: The auxiliary coastguard lookout at Ballycastle (in common with nearly all similar stations in the United Kingdom) is manned only when circumstances make it necessary. There is continuous VHF distress coverage off the Antrim coast from the Belfast maritime rescue sub-centre. This is the only permanently manned coastguard station in Northern Ireland.A regular coastguard sector officer is based at Ballycastle; he is responsible for an auxiliary coastguard team who can man the Ballycastle station at a few minutes' notice.Vessels plying between Rathlin island and the mainland should be properly equipped for this open sea passage: they should carry VHF radio, amongst other safety equipment, and with its aid would be able to keep in touch with the Belfast centre throughout their crossing. By this means, if the need occurred, the rescue services would be alerted very quickly. There is an auxilliary coastguard unit based on Rathlin island itself.

Northern Ireland

Secondary Schools (Strangford)

15.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what proposals he has for capital investment in secondary schools in the constituency of Strangford.

The Department of Education for Northern Ireland has approved in principle proposals for major capital schemes at Comber high school, Movilla high school, Newtownards and St. Columba's high school, Portaferry. Discussions have taken place with the governors of Lagan college about additional accommodation for that school but a capital scheme has not yet been approved.

Prisoners (Terrorist Offences)

18.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many prisoners in prisons in Northern Ireland are serving sentences for terrorist offences.

Out of 1,960 sentenced inmates in custody on 11 March just over 1,400— approximately 72 per cent.—were serving sentences for scheduled offences.

New Ireland Forum

19.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he has any plans to visit the Republic of Ireland after the report of the New Ireland Forum is published; and if he will make a statement.

I have at present no plans to visit the Republic of Ireland, but I expect to meet members of the Government there from time to time within the framework of the Anglo-Irish Intergovernmental Council to consider matters of mutual concern.

Unemployment

20.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement about proposals to reduce unemployment in Northern Ireland.

Economic activity in the Province is improving and this is helping to stabilise the employment situation. However the rate of unemployment remains high. This is partly due to the increased number of people of working age who have entered the labour market in recent years. However there are some encouraging signs.The small business sector has been particularly buoyant and the Local Enterprise Development Unit has demonstrated marked success in fostering new business start-ups. Despite the difficult economic times there are welcome signs of re-investment with the support of the Industrial Development Board by major companies already established in Northern Ireland. I have also been heartened by the ability of Shorts, and Harland and Wolff, to compete for and win business in the most competitive of industrial sectors. Government intend to build on this progress and to strengthen and develop the local industrial base to ensure that the Province can take full advantage of the growing national and international economic recovery.

In the shorter term a comprehensive range of employment and training measures directly reduces the level of unemployment and develops skills which will be needed in a period of renewed economic growth.

Noraid

21.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland whether he has made representations to the United States Government regarding the raising of funds in the United States of America for Noraid; and if he will make a statement.

We are concerned about any support, moral or financial, which may be given to terrorist organisations in Northern Ireland. My right hon. Friend spoke to the United States ambassador about these matters in February. We are grateful for the forthright condemnation of terrorism in Northern Ireland by President Reagan just before St. Patrick's Day.

Security

22.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement on the security situation in Northern Ireland.

25.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement on the security situation in Northern Ireland.

27.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement on the security situation in Northern Ireland.

I refer the hon. Gentlemen to the reply I gave my hon. Friend the Member for Berkshire, East (Mr. MacKay) earlier today.

23.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland whether he will make a statement about the co-ordination of security with the Republic of Ireland.

The professional co-operation between the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the Garda continues to be close and mutually beneficial.

Students (Travel Grants)

24.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will maintain the present system of travel grants to students for Northern Ireland.

No. The system of travel grants to Northern Ireland students will be changed from 1 September 1984, the date on which the same changes will be introduced in England and Wales.

Government Buildings (Flags)

26.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps he takes to ensure that the flag is flown on all Government buildings in Northern Ireland on the prescribed days.

All Government buildings in Northern Ireland are issued with a copy of the rules for hoisting the national flag, together with a list of the prescribed days on which the flag is to be flown in Northern Ireland. Arrangements exist for the notification of Government Departments on those occasions when the flag is to be flown by special command of Her Majesty.

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps he has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

Trade And Industry

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for trade and Industry what steps he has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

My Department took part in the surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon announced by my hon. Friend, the Minister of State, Treasury in the House on 24 March 1983, at column 461. My Department's policies and procedures were reviewed before CRE's code of practice became operative, and additional guidance and instructions have been issued. Equal opportunity officers have also been designated within the Department. We shall consider further action once the results of these surveys have been evaluated. The kind of positive action which the code recommends can be undertaken only where under-representation can be demonstrated.

Defence

Overseas Postings

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will estimate the savings to public funds that would arise if service postings abroad were on an unaccompanied basis in (a) the British Army of the Rhine, (b) the rest of Europe and (c) the remainder of the world; and if he will show separately the estimated savings in foreign exchange.

There are approximately 50,000 armed forces personnel serving overseas with their families. The introduction of an unaccompanied postings policy would represent a fundamental change in conditions of service with significant adverse effects on morale, recruitment and retention, and such a policy is not therefore under consideration. Furthermore, it would require a large-scale study to establish the net financial effects of an unaccompanied postings policy, taking into account many areas of additional costs as well as savings, and I regret that such information could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Times Tribune Corporation

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether his Department offered guidance to former military personnel, including Air Vice Marshal S.W. B. Menaul or Admiral Sir James Eberle about the sponsorship of a conference sponsored by the Times Tribune Corporation under the title of CAUSA or World Media Conference in October 1983.

No. My Department had no prior knowledge that former military personnel were being invited to attend.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether any Ministers or civil servants in his Department attended a conference sponsored by the Times Tribune Corporation under the title of CAUSA or World Media Conference in October 1983.

Nimrod Aircraft

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he is now able to make a statement on the maintenance, modification and updating of the Nimrod fleet.

The maintenance of Nimrod aircraft, including minor modifications, is normally carried out by the Royal Air Force, but major modifications are carried out by industry. We are, however, examining the scope for putting Nimrod major servicing out to competitive tender. Modifications and equipment updates will continue throughout the service life of all marks of Nimrod aircraft in order to maintain their capability and to meet changes in the threat.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he has any plans for upgrading the Nimrod aircraft or finding an alternative aircraft; and if he will make a statement.

A major programme to update the capability of Nimrods employed in the maritime reconnaissance role is nearing completion, and further enhancements are being considered. We are also studying options in the longer term for supplementing the aircraft in this role, but there are at present no plans to replace Nimrods with other aircraft. The maritime reconnaissance version should have another 20 years' life and the airborne early warning version has not yet entered service.

Bae Woodford (Work Force)

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what proposals he has for strategic reasons to maintain the existing work force at Woodford; and if he will make a statement.

Whilst I have every confidence in, and respect for, the work done at Woodford, which I visited recently, it is the case that the size of the work force maintained at Woodford is a matter for British Aerospace.

Airbus Industrie

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what studies have been made of the possibilities of Airbus Industrie providing the aircraft for carrying early warning equipment and undertaking maritime patrol duties; and if he will make a statement.

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what steps he has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

My Department took part in the surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon announced by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury in the House on 24 March 1983, at column 461. My Department's policies and procedures were reviewed before CRE's code of practice became operative, and additional guidance and instructions have been issued. Equal opportunity officers have also been designated within the Department. We shall consider further action once the results of these surveys have been evaluated. The kind of positive action which the code recommends can be undertaken only where under-representation can be demonstrated.

Environment

Sites Of Special Scientific Interest

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will give a list of the sites selected by the Nature Conservancy Council to be sites of special scientific interest which have been damaged or destroyed within the period of three months following the service of a notice under section 28 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

I am advised by the Nature Conservancy Council that the following 11 proposed sites of special scientific interest were either damaged or destroyed during the three-month period following service of a notice under section 28(2) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act. In some cases the damage has been slight: in two cases—Gillet's meadow and Kingsthorpe scrub field — the NCC considers that the scientific interest of the whole site has been destroyed.

  • Ripon Parks, North Yorkshire
  • Jeffrye Bog, North Yorkshire
  • Kingsthorpe Scrub Field, Northants
  • Gillet's Meadow (Yardley Hastings), Northants
  • Radmore Farm Marsh, Northants
  • Black Mountains, Hereford and Worcester
  • Rhos Derlwyn-Fawr, Dyfed
  • Comins Capel-Betws, Dyfed
  • Gwyneunydd Hafod-Wen, Powys
  • Torrs Warren, Wigtown, Dumfries and Galloway
  • Dalbeath Marsh, Dunfermline

Nature Conservation

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether the review of land drainage and conservation guidance notes on procedures for water authorities, internal drainage boards, Nature Conservancy Council and Countryside Commission, section 22 of the Water Act 1973 as amended by section 48 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, has been completed; and whether, in the light of this review, a revised version is to be produced.

The review of the land drainage and conservation guidance notes is not yet complete. The views of the Nature Conservancy Council, Countryside Commission, water authorities, internal drainage boards and various voluntary conservation bodies have been received and are being considered.

Essex (Green Belt Policy)

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if, in the light of the completion of parts of the M25 in Essex, it is his policy to relax development in the green belt in that county; and if he will make a statement.

I have no intention of relaxing control over development in green belt following the completion of the M25. I have recently published guidance about the M25 and land use planning in the south-east. This makes it plain that the general presumption against inappropriate development in the green belt is not affected by the M25. There should continue to be the strongest restraint on development there in accordance with the advice of MHLG 42/55.

Caravan Sites Act 1968

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list those London boroughs so far exempted from the provisions of the Caravan Sites Act 1968; and if he will make a statement.

There are no longer provisions to exempt authorities from the duty to provide accommodation for gipsies under the 1968 Act. These provisions were repealed by the Local Government Planning and Land Act 1980. Three London boroughs—Camden, Islington and Westminster—have been designated under section 12 of the 1968 Act without the need to provide sites. The effect of designation is to provide the designated authority with specific powers to control unauthorised gipsy encampments.

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what steps he has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

My Department took part in the surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon announced by my hon. Friend, the Minister of State, Treasury in the House on 24 March 1983 at column 465. We shall consider further action, once the results of these surveys have been evaluated. The kind of positive action the code recommends can only be undertaken where under-representation can be demonstrated. My Department's policies and procedures were reviewed before the CRE's code of practice became operative. An equal opportunity officer has also been designated within my Department.

Wales

Drug Addicts

asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is the percentage increase in the number of registered drug addicts in Wales since 1970; what is his estimate of the increase in drug-taking in Wales; and if he will make a statement.

I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply given to the hon. Member for Alyn and Deeside (Mr. Jones) on 13 April 1984, at column 433.

Business Confidence

asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will make a statement about current business confidence in Wales.

My contacts with individual companies generally indicate that business confidence in Wales is increasing and the most recent CBI industrial trends survey for Wales, in January this year, reported improvement in business optimism amongst Welsh manufacturers and expectations of increases in new orders and volume of output. The measures announced by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer in his Budget statement provide a sound basis for further growth in confidence and optimism in the business community.

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for Wales what steps he has taken since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on a April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

My Department's policies and procedures were reviewed before CRE's code of practice became operative, and additional guidance and instructions are being issued. An equal opportunity officer has also been designated within the Department. We have not carried out any ethnic monitoring. We shall consider further action once the results of surveys in the north-west and Avon announced by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury, in the House on 24 March 1983, at column 461, have been evaluated. The kind of positive action which the code recommends can be undertaken only where under-representation can be demonstrated.

Employment

Census Of Employment

asked the Secretary of State for Employment when he will publish the 1981 census of employment by travel-to-work area.

Although they do not form part of the published set of results, 1981 census of employment data for travel-to-work areas have been available to inquirers since March. A redefinition of travel-to-work areas, based on the commuting patterns recorded in the 1981 census of population, is currently being undertaken and 1981 census of employment data will be made available for the new areas when the redefinition is complete.

Youth Training Scheme

asked the Secretary of State for Employment upon what evidence the Manpower Service Commission based its decision that social skills training is useful or feasible and that it should be applied to youth training scheme trainees.

The inclusion of personal and life skills in youth training scheme programmes was recommended by the youth task group as one means of contributing to the successful achievement of the aims of the scheme. The youth training scheme does not advocate training in social skills as has been practised in the past. It places considerable emphasis on personal effectiveness and communication skills which are developed by experience in the workplace.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the net cost of each filled and each unfilled place in each category and subcategory of the youth training scheme.

The estimated cost to the Manpower Services Commission of a filled place for a full year on the youth training scheme in 1983–84 is as follows:

£
Mode A1,950
Mode B1
Community Projects3,500
Training Workshop3,900
Information Technology Centres4,200
Mode B1 overall3,600
ModeB22,200
These figures exclude VAT, the cost of unfilled places, travel costs, lodging allowances and so on.A payment of £100 is made to managing agents for each contracted mode A place, whether or not the place is filled. In addition, compensation may be paid to managing agents for the inescapable costs of vacated places.The Manpower Services Commission pays for the cost of a mode B1 scheme (other than trainee allowances) according to the number of approved places on the scheme whether or not they are filled. The average annual cost of unfilled mode B1 places has been estimated as follows:
£
Community Projects1,850
Training Workshops2,200
Information Technology Centres2,450
Weighted average2,000
The cost of unfilled mode B2 places is restricted to certain fee payments to providers. About £50 per approved place is paid, irrespective of whether or not it is filled.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment how the social skills training undertaken by the Manpower Services Commission as part of the youth training scheme is being evaluated to assess its worth; and if he is satisfied that those conducting the evaluation are properly qualified to do so.

The extent to which youth training scheme programmes help trainees to develop personal effectiveness is assessed as an integral part of the monitoring of scheme performance. We are satisfied that Manpower Services Commission staff are able to make sound judgments about the overall effectiveness of youth training scheme programmes.

asked the Secretary of State for Employment if the Manpower Services Commission requires those who teach social skills training as part of the youth training scheme to be properly qualified.

Those providing guidance and assisting in the development of personal effectiveness and communication skills in the workplace will not necessarily be formally qualified but will be responsible adults with experience of working life.

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for Employment what steps he has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

My Department took part in the surveys in the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon announced by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury in his reply to my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Burton (Mr. Lawrence) on 24 March 1983, at column 465. We shall consider further action once the results of these surveys have been evaluated. The kind of positive action which the code recommends can be undertaken only where under-representation can be demonstrated. My Department's policies and procedures were reviewed before the code came into effect; additional guidance and instructions have been issued and equal opportunities officers have been designated.

Central Arbitration Committee

asked the Secretary of State for Employment when he expected to receive the annual report of the Central Arbitration Committee.

I have received the CAC report for 1983, which will be published and laid before both Houses of Parliament today. Copies are available from the Vote Office.

Attorney-General

Northern Ireland (Jury Trials)

28.

asked the Attroney-General if he will publish a discussion paper on jury trial in Northern Ireland of civil cases which are tried without jury in England and Wales.

It is clear from informal consultations with the judiciary, the legal profession, industry, trade unions and other interested persons and bodies that no agreement would at present be reached on proposals to change the law on jury trials in civil actions in Northern Ireland. However, the Northern Ireland Supreme Court Rules Committee is considering amendments to the rules of court on lodgment and on the pre-trial exchange of medical reports which, if adopted, could increase the proportion of cases which are settled before going to trial and hence reduce costs.

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Attorney-General what steps he and the Lord Chancellor have taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by their Departments and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

The Lord Chancellor's Department took part in the surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon announced by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury, in the House on 24 March 1983 at column 461. The Lord Chancellor will consider further action once the results of these surveys have been evaluated. The kind of positive action the code recommends can only be undertaken where under-representation can be demonstrated.Of the other three Departments for which I answer—the Law Officers' Department, the Treasury Solicitor's Department and the Department of the Director of Public Prosecutions—both the Treasury Solicitor's Department and the Director's Department reviewed their policies and procedures before the CRE's code of practice became operative and they issued additional guidance and instructions. Equal opportunity officers have also been designated within both Departments. None of the three Departments has carried out any ethnic monitoring, but future action will be considered once the results of the surveys have been evaluated.

Education And Science

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what steps he has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

The Department took part in the surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon announced by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury, in the House on 24 March 1983 at column 461. The Department's policies and procedures were reviewed before CRE's code of practice became operative, and additional guidance and instructions have been issued. Equal opportunity officers have also been designated within the Department. We shall consider further action once the results of these surveys have been evaluated. The kind of positive action the code recommends can only be undertaken where under-representation can be demonstrated.

Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs

Competition

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether he will list measures to encourage competition being considered by his Department.

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office will encourage competition wherever possible by promoting, in the relevant international organisations and in bilateral diplomatic relations, policies which will enable British companies to compete more effectively and profitably worldwide through unhindered trade in goods and services.

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps he has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

The Liverpool passport office, then part of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, took part in the surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon announced by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury, in the House on 24 March 1983. My Department's policies and procedures are being reviewed to ensure they are consistent with the CRE's code of practice. Equal opportunity officers have also been nominated within the Department. We shall consider further action in respect of ethnic monitoring once the results of the surveys mentioned have been evaluated.

Home Department

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what steps he has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

My Department took part in the recent surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and in the county of Avon, and I am considering, in consultation with my colleagues, what further action to take in the light of the information obtained from these surveys.

Solicitor-General For Scotland

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Solicitor-General for Scotland what steps the Lord Advocate has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by the Lord Advocate's Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

My Department's policies were reviewed before CRE's code of practice became operative, and additional guidance and instructions have been issued. An equal opportunities officer has also been designated within the Department. We have not carried out any ethnic monitoring. We shall consider further action once the results of surveys in the north-west and Avon announced by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury, in the House on 24 March 1983, at column 465, have been evaluated. The kind of positive action the code recommends can only be undertaken where under-representation can be demonstrated.

Energy

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Secretary of State for Energy what steps he has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensure compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

My Department's policies and procedures were re-examined before the code of the Commission for Racial Equality became operative, and additional guidance and instructions have been issued. An equal opportunity officer has been designated within the Department. My Department took part in the surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon announced by my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury in the House on 24 March 1983 at column 461. We shall consider further action once the results of these surveys have been evaluated. The kind of positive action the code recommends can only be undertaken where under-representation can be demonstrated.

National Finance

Shipping Industry

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what he assesses the effect of the change of capital allowances and the removal of free depreciation will be upon the United Kingdom shipping industry.

The changes in the capital allowances proposed by my right hon. Friend are part of a wider reform of business taxation, which includes substantial reductions in the rates of corporation tax together with the abolition of the national insurance surcharge and stock relief. The precise net effect of these changes on tax liabilities of shipping companies in future years will depend, amongst other things, on the rate of new investment, the rate of disposal of existing vessels, the level of profits and the extent of tax exhaustion.

Creche Facilities (Income Tax)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether it is the policy of the Inland Revenue, where a taxpayer is assessed to income tax in respect of creche facilities provided as a benefit in kind by his employer, and where those facilities have been provided for his use in earlier years than that in which such as assessment is first made, to raise similar assessments in respect of the earlier years.

Tax law does not distinguish between a benefit in kind which takes the form of free or subsidised creche facilities and other benefits provided by employers. Where benefits have escaped tax it is the Revenue's normal practice to seek tax for back years in worthwhile cases.

Seafarers (Income Tax)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what it would cost to maintain the relief from income tax under case I of schedule E in relation to short or intermittent absences abroad for registered British seafarers.

Value Added Tax

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much it would cost to exempt all recipients of mobility allowance from value added tax on the purchase of a motor car for their own use.

Relieving all current recipients of mobility allowance of the VAT chargeable on a car costing £5,000 would reduce the revenue by about £200 million. (This estimate includes relief on cars for the benefit of recipients of mobility allowance too young to drive).

Vehicle Excise Duty

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much it would cost to exempt all recipients of mobility allowance who own a motor car from vehicle excise duty.

Exemption from vehicle excise duty already applies in respect of any car used by or for the purposes of a person who is in in receipt of mobility allowance.

Taxation

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer(1) what is his estimate of the total amount of taxable income upon which income tax will be levied in 1984–85; what is his estimate of the tax that will be paid; what were the corresponding figures, in each case, in 1978–79; and if he will express these latter figures in 1984–85 prices;(2) what is his estimate of the total amount of taxable profits upon which corporation tax will be levied in 1984–85; what is his estimate of the corporation tax which will be paid; what were the corresponding figures, in each case, in 1978–79; and if he will express these latter figures in 1984–85 prices;(3) what proportion of the real increase in taxes on expenditure of £9·2 billion between 1978–79 and 1984–85 is attributable to changes in the rates of these taxes; and what proportion is attributable to changes in the amounts of expenditure for which the taxes are levied;(4) what is the estimated yield from all sources of taxation for 1983–84 revalued at 1984–85 prices; and what was the comparable yield in 1978–79 revalued at 1984–85 prices.

Drug Seizures

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he is satisfied with the establishment of Her Majesty's Customs and Excise and in respect of the drug seizures made in Liverpool and Merseyside over recent years; and if he will make a statement.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he can estimate the value of the drug seizures made by Her Majesty's Customs and Excise in (a) Liverpool and (b) Merseyside in each of the past five years.

The estimated values are as follows. They are based on what Customs believe to be the street level prices when the drugs were seized.

LiverpoolMerseyside
££
19791,920,007
19802,780,01250,062
19814,978,15093
19824,681,000603,750
19832,175,3422,860,002

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the amount and type of drugs impounded by Her Majesty's Customs and Excise in (a) Liverpool and (b) Merseyside in each of the past five years.

The information is as follows:

LiverpoolMerseyside
kgskgs
1979
Herbal cannabis1,536·19
Cannabis resin0·005
1980
Herbal cannabis1,886·9540·05
Cannabis resin209·2152·564
Cannabis oil0·466
1981
Herbal cannabis3,717·0860·059
Cannabis resin162·1990·010
Amphetamines0·790
1982
Herbal cannabis3,732·18143·0
Cannabis resin8·067274·968
LSD0·0057
1983
Herbal cannabis1,235·3032·3
Cannabis resin3·1831,737·1
LSD284 tablets
Amphetamines0·5
Cocaine0·1
Heroin6·1982·545

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many drug seizures have been made by Her Majesty's Customs and Excise in (a) Liverpool, and (b) Merseyside in each of the past five years to the latest date.

The information is as follows:

LiverpoolMerseyside
197932
1980504
1981693
1982422
19833310
1984 to date121

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the country of departure of ships, and what flags they carried, on which drugs have been seized by Her Majesty's Customs and Excise in Liverpool and Merseyside over the past five years.

The recorded countries of departure of ships from which drugs were seized in Liverpool and Merseyside over the past five years are as follows. The list is not exhaustive and the country shown may not always be the place of original departure. Details of the flags of the vessels are not kept centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate costs:

AustraliaMorocco
BrazilNew Zealand
CanadaNigeria
DoudlaPakistan
FranceRepublic of Ireland
GhanaSouth Africa
GreeceSudan
HollandTurkey
ItalyU.S.A
KenyaWest Germany
Lebanon

Customs Officials

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many Customs officials were employed in (a) Liverpool and (b) Merseyside in April 1979 and April 1984, respectively.

I regret that separate figures for Liverpool and Merseyside are not maintained. The numbers of Customs and Excise staff employed on customs work in Liverpool collection as a whole (defined by the 1979 boundaries) were:

Number
1 April 1979322
1 April 1983241
Corresponding figures for 1984 are not yet available.

Ethnic Monitoring And Positive Action

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what steps he has taken, since the coming into effect of the code of the Commission for Racial Equality on 1 April, to ensre compliance by his Department and, in particular, with the recommendations in respect of ethnic monitoring and of positive action, respectively.

The Treasury has not carried out any ethnic monitoring. However the Inland Revenue, the Department for National Savings, Her Majesty's Stationery Office and Her Majesty's Customs and Excise, took part in the surveys of the ethnic origins of non-industrial civil servants in the north-west and the county of Avon which I announced in the House on 24 March 1983 at column 461. We shall consider further action, once the results of these surveys have been evaluated. The kind of positive action the code recommends can be undertaken only where under-representation can be demonstrated.

Personal Income

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the average income after tax per head in each of the standard economic regions in 1979 and at the latest available date.

I refer the hon. Member to table 9.7 of "Regional Trends" 1984, which shows the latest available information. There is a copy in the Library of the House.

Gross Domestic Product

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will tabulate the gross domestic product per head as a percentage of the United Kingdom average in 1979 and at the latest available date, for each of the standard economic regions.

I refer the hon. Member to table 9·2 of "Regional Trends 1984", which shows the latest available information. There is a copy in the Library of the House.

Construction Industry (Vat)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will assess the effect of the proposals in the Finance Bill with regard to value added tax on construction as they affect listed buildings.

Repair and maintenance work to listed buildings, which is what is needed to keep them in a good state, has always been liable to VAT at the standard rate. The withdrawal of the relief for other work to existing buildings must be seen in that context.

Government Contracts (Research And Development Expenditure)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer why he has rejected the recommendations of the independent review board on the arrangements for remunerating Government contracts relating to private venture research and development expenditure; and if he will make a statement.

[pursuant to his reply, 12 April 1984, c. 349]: I assume my hon. Friend is referring to the report on the fourth general review of the profit formula for non-competitive government contracts prepared by the review board for government contracts, which was the subject of a reply on 29 March at column 249–50.Two recommendations in the report relating to the private venture research and development are unacceptable to the Government.One recommendation could have led to substantial additional claims by contractors for over heads attributed to Government non-competitive contracts, as a result of classifying as applied research work which has hitherto been defined as product development. As explained in the report, product development is recovered by a direct charge to the product concerned rather than a charge to the total output (including Government non-competitive contracts) of the product group. Where the Government buy such a product the price includes a fair share of the contractor's development cost. The Government saw no case for increasing the amount of private venture product development expenditure recovered in overheads on Government non-competitive contracts.The other recommendation on PVR&D was the change proposed to the existing arrangements which would have allowed the acceptance of abortive product development expenditure as overheads, even where the Government receive no benefit from the expenditure.Apart from minor points of clarification, the only other recommendations which the Government were unable to accept related to the treatment of intangible fixed assets. It has not been government practice to allow the costs of depreciation on intangible assets, such as trademarks and patents, in overheads attributable to Government noncompetitive contracts. Nor do the Government consider that there is a case for extending the existing convention and thereby increasing the amount allowed for patents and trademarks in capital employed for the purposes of calculating the profit paid on non-competitive contracts.Acceptance of the various recommendations described above would have considerably eroded the savings resulting from the reduced target profit rate.

South Africa (Arms Sales)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will stop the Board of the Customs and Excise compounding penalties in situations of omission of export licences of sales of arms to South Africa.

[pursuant to his reply, 25 April 1984]: No. The criteria which the commissioners apply in deciding deciding whether to compound were explained in the answer that I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Leicester, East (Mr. Bruinvels) on 25 April 1984.

Taxation

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if any benefit in kind from an employer is taxable on any employee who is not a director or categorized as higher paid for income tax purposes.

[pursuant to his reply, 25 April 1984]: Benefits in kind provided for employees who are neither directors nor "higher-paid" employees for the purposes of part III, chapter II of Finance Act 1976 are assessable to tax when the benefit is convertible into cash; represents the meeting of an employee's pecuniary liability; is provided by way of a "voucher" or "credit-token"; or takes the form of provided living accommodation.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when the definition of higher paid for income tax purposes was last changed; and what would be its value in 1984–85 prices or earnings terms.

[pursuant to his reply, 25 April 1984]: The current threshold figure of £8,500 has applied since 6 April 1979. If this figure had been index-linked by reference to the retail price index, its estimated value for 1984–85 would be in the region of £13,000.

Value Added Tax

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will set out the most up-to-date information regarding value added tax on take-away meals or meals eaten out in the member States of the European Community showing the rate applicable to different types of (a) food or (b) packaging.

[pursuant to the reply, 25 April 1984]: Following inquiries of the tax administrations of other EC Member States, the most recent information is shown in the following table. In the case of take-away meals, I regret that much of the information is at variance with that given in reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Devon, North (Mr. Speller) on 7 February at column 561–62 and I apologise for having inadvertently misled the House.

Take-away meals per cent.Restaurant meals per cent
Belgium617
Denmark2222
France*5·518·6
Germany714
Greece
Ireland‡023
Italy1010
Luxembourg66
Netherlands║/19/55
United Kingdom¶015
* In the case of establishments providing facilities, however minimal, for on the spot consumption, the 18·6 per cent, rate is normally applied to all dishes sold for consumption on or off the premises. If however the establishment keeps a separate account for take-away sales, the 5·5 per cent, rate may be charged. Take-away drinks except milk are taxed at 18·6 per cent.
† VAT not yet introduced.
‡ Except for take-away chips, which are taxable at the lower rate of 23 per cent.
║ Take-away snacks, e.g. chips and sausage rolls, are taxed at 19 per cent.; whole meals are taxed at 5 per cent.
¶ Hot take-away food and drink are taxable at the standard rate of 15 per cent, with effect from 1 May.
The rates of tax applicable to packaging for take-away food cannot be readily ascertained.