Written Answers To Questions
Thursday 7 June 1984
Home Department
Body Belt Restraints
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department in what circumstances body belt restraints may be used in prisons; and on whose authority.
The circumstances in which body belts and other restraints may be used, and the ways in which their use must be authorised, are set out in rule 46 of the Prison Rules 1964, as amended.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the prisons in which body belt restraints were used in 1983.
Central records indicate that the following establishments used body belts in 1983:
Prison Establishment
- Bedford
- Birmingham
- Blundeston
- Bristol
- Camp Hill
- Canterbury
- Chelmsford
- Cookham Wood
- Deerbolt
- Durham
- Exeter
- Gartree
- Hull
- Leicester
- Lewes
- Lincoln
- Long Lartin
- Maidstone
- Northallerton
- Parkhurst
- Pentonville
- Preston
- Rochester
- Stafford
- Wandsworth
- Winchester
- Wormwood Scrubs
Immigration Rules
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he expects to complete his review of paragraphs 87 of the Immigration Rules.
The relevant instructions to immigration officers are being amended to ensure that they are consistent with paragraph 87 of the Immigration Rules.
Police (Training)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will estimate the cost of the initial training of a police officer.
Information on the total costs of initial training, which will vary from force to force, is not collected centrally. The cost of the 14 weeks initial course at a district police training centre, which a recruit to a provincial force in England and Wales attends as part of the two-year training programme for probationer constables, is estimated to average £2,500 per trainee in this financial year.
Police
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he is satisfied that the present strength of the police forces in England and Wales is sufficient to deal with extra demands upon their services of a substantial and sustained character without prejudice to the fulfilment of their normal duties.
Chief officers are expected to deploy manpower flexibly to meet changing priorities in day-to-day policing. Substantial additional demands are met by overtime and rest-day working and greater use of the Special Constabulary and sometimes by help fro other forces. Although some forces are better placed than others to meet major increases in their work load, we are satisfied with the overall strength of the police service in England and Wales, which was 121,122 on 30 April 1984.
British Courts (Jurisdiction)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department on what occasions in the last five years an accused person has in a criminal case been allowed to leave the jurisdiction of British courts before trial; and if he will make a statement.
The information requested is not available. The Bail Act 1976 envisages that a defendant may wish to leave the United Kingdom during the period before his trial; in such a case section 3(5) empowers the court to require him to give security for his return to stand trial.
Political Refugee Status
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what are the criteria for the granting of political refugee status; and if he will make a statement.
The criteria are those set out in the 1951 convention relating to the status of refugees and its protocol of 1967. They are reflected at paragraph 73 of the published Immigration Rules (HC 169).
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many Iranians have applied for political refugee status since 1979 to the latest date; and how many have been granted this status.
Between 1 January 1979 and 31 December 1983, 7,945 applications were received from Iranian nationals, of whom 4,164 have been recognised as refugees and 998 granted asylum without refugee status. In addition, some of those whose applications were refused have been allowed to stay on an exceptional basis; 1,152 cases were outstanding at the end of 1983.
Mentally Handicapped Persons (Imprisonment)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many mentally handicapped persons are currently detained in Her Majesty's prisons; and if he will make a statement.
The number of mentally handicapped inmates is not recorded. However, prison medical officers made six-monthly returns of inmates whom they consider to be mentally disordered within the meaning of the Mental Health Act 1983. On 29 September 1983, the most recent date for which these statistics are available, there were 316 inmates who were considered by medical officers to be mentally disordered within the terms of the Mental Health Act 1959, which was then still in force. Of these, two were assessed as severely subnormal and 21 as subnormal.
Metropolitan Police
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is the current strength of the Metropolitan police and the S division, respectively; and how these figures compare with each of the last five years.
The information requested is as follows:
| Metropolitan police—number of officers at 31 May | ||
| Metropolitan police | 'S' district | |
| 1979 | 22,306 | 610 |
| 1980 | 22,853 | 607 |
| 1981 | 24,339 | 662 |
| 1982 | 25,765 | 697 |
| 1983 | 26,479 | 699 |
| 1984 | 26,784 | 724 |
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how the serious crimes recorded in the Metropolitan police S district in 1983 compared with those committed in 1982.
I understand from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis that the number of notifiable offences recorded by the police in S district—Barnet and Hertsmere — was 20,000 in 1983 compared with 20,900 in 1982.
Council Of Europe (Madrid Conference)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on his participation in the Council of Europe 14th conference of European Ministers of Justice in Madrid and the conclusions reached by that conference.
With my right hon. and learned Friend the Attorney-General and my hon. and learned Friend the Solicitor-General for Scotland I attended this conference, which was held on 29 to 31 May.On my initiative, the conference discussed the question of a common approach to the problem of terrorist activities, including those committed by abuse of diplomatic privileges and immunities. I urged the need for member states to act in concert against this new and dangerous threat to peace and security—for example, by refusing to accept as diplomats those who have been expelled from any other member state on grounds of involvement in terrorism, and by improving the existing arrangements for exchange of information between us about threatened terrorist acts and the Governments or groups who pose such threats.The Ministers of Justice of the 21 Council of Europe nations subsequently unanimously agreed on the need for a concerted approach to action against all forms of terrorism and international organised crime, including acts of violence against diplomats and the abuse of diplomatic immunities and privileges for terrorist purposes, recognising in particular the urgent need to improve the exchange of information between member states. They recommended to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe that these questions should be studied urgently by an ad hoc body open to all Ministers exercising responsibilities relating to terrorism.I also presented on behalf of the United Kingdom a paper on maintaining the effectiveness of the administration of criminal justice at a time of increasing crime, a copy of which I am putting in the Library of the House. The conference accepted the main conclusions set out in this paper, and agreed that the European Committee on crime problems should keep these considerations in mind in the planning of conduct of its future work.The conference also agreed on the need for further study of the scope for harmonisation of bankruptcy law, and for the simplification of procedures for executing civil judgments.
Parole
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department with regard to his announcement concerning parole in October 1983, how many prisoners serving more than five years for offences of violence or drug trafficking have been considered exceptional and have been recommended for release on parole; and what have been considered to be exceptional circumstances.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to a question from the hon. Member for Knowsley, North (Mr. Kilroy-Silk) on 3 May at column 209. The results of the assessment of the working of the new policy will be made available after the summer recess.
Magistrates' Courts (Sentencing Powers)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will review the operation of section 1(7) of the Justices of the Peace Act 1968 by magistrates' courts in England and Wales; and if he will make a statement.
The Law Commission is engaged in a review of the powers of magistrates' courts to bind over to keep the peace or be of good behaviour. My right hon. and learned Friend proposes to await the completion of this review.
Mentally Disturbed Prisoners
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will draw up a definition, for use in prisons, of the management of prisoners who appear to be mentally disturbed; and if he will make a statement.
Inmates who suffer from some form of degree of mental disturbance do not form a single homogeneous group and I doubt that a single definition of this kind would be practicable or desirable. The medical care of inmates is the responsibility of the medical officer concerned, who is in the best position to judge how to meet their particular needs.
Wpc Yvonne Fletcher (Memorial)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is the latest position over a fitting memorial in St. James's square to police officer Yvonne Fletcher; and if he will make a statement.
I understand that this proposal is being considered by the trustees of the Police Memorial Trust, and the trustees of the St. James's square gardens. I hope that agreement can be reached.
Coal Industry Dispute
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many plain clothes police officers are operating within National Union of Mineworkers' picket lines.
I understand from chief officers of police that police officers in plain clothes are sometimes being used in the policing of events arising from the miners' dispute to help the police to identify those who are engaged in or threatening violence. Information about the numbers of officers performing such duties is not available centrally.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many Metropolitan police officers are employed on duties associated with the policing of the current mining dispute.
The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis tells me that since the dispute began the number of his officers having to be deployed on duties arising from it has varied from day to day. The maximum deployment on any one day has been some 1,000 officers, assisting other police forces.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the total number of police officers involved in duties associated with the current mining dispute in each of the weeks since the dispute began.
The number of police officers deployed has varied from day to day, and some officers have performed relevant duties on more than one day in a week. The table gives, to the nearest 100, the maximum number of officers from other forces deployed to assist those forces most affected by the dispute during each week from 14 March to 5 June inclusive. Large numbers of local officers have also been deployed.
| Maximum number of officers from other forces deployed on any one day | |
| Week | Number |
| 14 March to 18 March | 6,900 |
| 19 March to 25 March | 7,500 |
| 26 March to 1 April | 5,800 |
| 2 April to 8 April | 5,500 |
| 9 April to 15 April | 5,600 |
| 16 April to 22 April | 4,800 |
| 23 April to 29 April | 3,700 |
| 30 April to 6 May | 4,500 |
| 7 May to 13 May | 4,800 |
| 14 May to 20 May | 4,300 |
| 21 May to 27 May | 5,100 |
| 28 May to 3 June | 4,800 |
| 4 June to 5 June | 5,800 |
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will call for reports from chief constables as to how many pickets arrested, since the beginning of the miners' dispute, in Warwickshire were arrested by (a) officers from the Warwickshire police area and (b) officers from outside the Warwickshire police area; and if he will provide a breakdown of the nature of the charge in each case for (a) and (b).
The chief constable of Warwickshire tells me that of the 83 arrests made in Warwickshire between 14 March and 5 June inclusive in relation to events arising from the dispute, 24 were made by police officers from his force, and 59 by officers from other forces. The following tables provide information about the charges subsequently brought.
| Arrests by Warwickshire officers | |
| Charges brought | Number |
| Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1936 (conduct conductive to a breach of the peace) | 11 |
| Criminal damage | 1 |
| Attempted criminal damage | 1 |
| Assault | 2 |
| Obstruction of the highway | 1 |
| Firearms offence | 1 |
| Not proceeded with | 7 |
| 24 | |
| Arrests by other officers | |
| Charges brought | Number |
| Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1936 | 42 |
| Criminal damage | 2 |
| Assault | 1 |
| Obstruction of the highway | 6 |
| Obstruction of the police | 8 |
| 59 | |
Anti-Apartheid Demonstration (Police Deployment)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many police were deployed on 2 June for the anti-apartheid demonstration against the visit of P. W. Botha; what was the cost involved; what was the size of the demonstration; and how many arrests were made.
The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis tells me that 1,536 police officers were deployed during the demonstration; that the estimated additional cost of the deployment was some £180,000; that the estimate is that some 14,000 people took part in the demonstration; and that there were 28 arrests.
Police (Anti-Corruption Squad)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if, following the Countryman inquiry, a permanent anti-corruption squad has been set up.
No. Operation Countryman, which began in 1978, was a police investigation under section 49 of the Police Act 1964 to inquire into specific allegations of corruption against menbers of the City of London and Metropolitan police forces. Although many serious allegations were made against London police officers and a number of officers were prosecuted or disciplined, the inquiries did not reveal evidence of widespread or systematic corruption and there has been no evidence to suggest a need for a permanent specialist squad of anticorruption investigators.Each police force has within it a centralised complaints and discipline department to conduct inquiries into allegations of all kinds including corruption. Chief officers may request that officers from another force be provided where necessary to ensure a properly independent investigation. A major new independent element in the supervision of complaint investigations will be provided by the police complaints authority, to be set up under the Police and Criminal Evidence Bill now before Parliament.
Energy
Radiation Protection
asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he is satisfied with the level of protection against radiation given to workers in all sections of nuclear power stations; and if he will make a statement.
The Health and Safety Executive imposes requirements under its nuclear site licence conditions to protect workers at nuclear power stations in England and Wales and to control radiation doses to well within the limits recommended internationally. I am satisfied that these measures continue to be adequate. Nuclear power stations in Scotland are a matter for my hon. Friend.
North Sea Oil (Licences)
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what criteria will determine the allocation of licences for the next round of North sea oil explorations; when he expects these new licences to be granted and in what numbers; and if he will make a statement.
The criteria for the ninth round are set out in the text of the Gazette Notice referred to in the reply I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Cardiff, Central (Mr. Grist) on 24 May. As I said in that reply, I expect to license some 80 of the 195 blocks on offer. The awards are likely to be completed in the spring of 1985.
National Finance
Agriculture (Budget)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what effect he estimates the 1983 Budget will have on United Kingdom agriculture and on United Kingdom farmers.
A number of measures in the Budget will be of considerable help to United Kingdom agriculture and United Kingdom farmers — the increase in the basic thresholds, the abolition of investment income surcharge, the reduction in the top rate of capital transfer tax and the increase in the development land tax threshold. The longer-term effects will depend upon various factors, for example, the scope for making further reductions in income tax in future Budgets.
Charities
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many charities received refunds of income tax during the latest financial year for which figures are available.
I regret that precise information is not avialable, since the central record of claims is not maintained in charity order. In the year ended 30 September 1983 there were about 105,000 claims of repayments made by charities, but individual charities may have made more than one claim in the year.
Taxation
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the annual amount of revenue gained by the Exchequer by making the benefits taxable in the hands of taxpayers paying tax above the standard rate.
About £100 million in a full year at 1984–85 levels of income and tax thresholds.
Departmental Staff
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many of the employees in his Department are the holders of degrees or diplomas which were awarded by the Open University.
Eleven of the staff employed in the Treasury have Open University degrees.
Economic Statistics (International Comparisons)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will provide, further to the answer to the hon. Member for Oldham, West on 16 May, Official Report, column 183, comparative data on gross domestic product, manufacturing, wages, prices, productivity, investment and wages and prices per unit of output for each of the countries listed for the period 1980 to 1983.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Interest Rates
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will take action to hold down interest rates; and if he will make a statement.
We continue to give high priority towards encouraging lower interest rates. Maintaining sound fiscal and monetary conditions is the best way to ensure a downward trend in inflation and interest rates over the medium term. But interest rates are bound to fluctuate if we are to keep control of monetary growth.
Duchy Of Cornwall
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he expects to lay the accounts of the Duchy of Cornwall before Parliament.
The revenue and capital accounts of the Duchy of Cornwall for the year ended 31 December 1983 were laid before the House on 18 May 1984 and printed as HC 426 on that date.
Public Expenditure Plans
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he has any intention of altering his public expenditure plans for 1984–85.
No.
Ec (Finance Council)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement about the meeting of the European Community Finance Council in Luxembourg on 4 June.
I represented the United Kingdom at this Council.Ministers exchanged views on issues to be discussed at the London economic summit, including the US budget deficit, interest rates and international debt.The Council agreed in principle to increase the ceiling on the Community loan mechanism from 6 billion to 8 billion ecu (£4·8 billion).Ministers also discussed: the options for implementing a system of stricter budgetary discipline as provisionally agreed at the March European Council; tax measures to encourage co-operation between undertakings in different member states; European innovation loans; and non-life insurance services.
Company Cars
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what proportion of the tax revenue of £280 million derived in 1983–84 from taxing the benefit of company cars available for private use was attributable to the vehicle rather than to fuel; from how many cars this revenue was raised; what revenue would have been raised, excluding that raised from fuel, if the benefit had been taxed at its full worth, assuming the same number of cars in this category; and from how many more cars revenue would have been raised if people earning less than £8,500 had not been exempt.
[pursuant to his reply, 6 June 1984, c. 185]: About two thirds (£190 million) of the estimated total yield in 1983–84 was from taxing the benefit of company cars available for private use rather than from fuel.A provisional estimate, based on the family expenditure survey, suggests that in 1983–84 there were about 1½ million company cars available for private use. It is estimated that in 1983–84 about 1 million such cars attracted a tax charge under the special rules for taxing benefits in kind in the hands of directors and those employees earning at a rate of £8,500 or more a year.I regret that information is not available on which to base a reliable estimate of the yield if the benefit from the private use of company cars were to be taxed at its "full worth".
Vat Registration
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer under what circumstances it is possible for commercial bodies acting in contravention of the law to be registered for value added tax purposes; and how it is possible for so-called pirate radio stations to be so registered.
I shall let my hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.
Pirate Radio Stations
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether the Inland Revenue recognises expenditure on so-called pirate radio stations for tax purposes.
I shall let my hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.
Hard Drugs (Illegal Importation)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he now has any plans to increase the number of Customs and Excise officers concerned with the illegal import of hard drugs.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Education And Science
Cambridge University Medical School
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what representations he has received opposing the proposal to close the neurochemical pharmacology unit at Cambridge university medical school; what action he intends to take; and if he will make a statement.
No representations have been received to date about any proposal to close the Medical Research Council's neurochemical pharmacology unit at Cambridge. It is for the MRC to decide on priorities for medical research within the cash sums allocated to it annually from the science budget. I understand from the MRC that the future of the unit is under consideration but that no final decisions have yet been taken.
Barnett Janner Trophy Competition
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he will arrange for an exhibition to be displayed in the Upper Waiting Hall of entries for the Barnett Janner trophy competition.
I understand that arrangements have been made with the authorities of the House for the exhibition to be held in the Upper Waiting Hall for one week commencing Monday 11 June.
Wales
Young Persóns
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is his latest assessment of the number of young persons who have reached the age of 16 years but not yet reached the age of 21 years in Wales.
239,400.
Milk Quotas
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will take steps to accelerate the availability of precise milk quota information to farms that are at present up for sale.
Details of milk quotas for all eligible holdings will be announced as quickly as possible following consultation with the interests concerned.
Education Expenditure
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what was the amount spent per secondary pupil in Wales in 1978–79 and in 1983–84, expressed in 1983;–84 terms.
The information is as follows:
| Net recurrent institutional costs per pupil at maintained secondary schools in Wales: 1983–84 prices | |
| 1978–79 | £930 |
| 1983–84 | *£985 |
| * Provisional estimate. | |
Prime Minister
Pay Review Bodies
asked the Prime Minister if she will make a statement on the reports of the pay review bodies.
The first reports of the new Review Body for Nursing Staff, Midwives, Health Visitors and Professions allied to Medicine, and the reports of the Doctors and Dentists Review Body, the Armed Forces Pay Review Body and the Top Salaries Review Body have been published today. Copies are now available in the Vote Office. The Government are grateful to the members of the review bodies for these reports and for the time and care which they have put into their preparation.The report on nursing staff, midwives and health visitors recommends new rates of pay which will add 7·5 per cent. to the estimated pay bill for 1984–85. In the report on professions allied to medicine the equivalent figure is 7·8 per cent. The Government have decided to accept the recommendations in full with effect from 1 April 1984.The reports of the Doctors and Dentists Review Body, the Armed Forces Pay Review Body and the Top Salaries Review Body on the higher Civil Service, senior armed forces officers and the judiciary recommend increases which would add 6·9 per cent., 7·6 per cent., and just under 6·5 per cent., respectively, to the estimated 1984–85 pay bills for the groups concerned. Bearing in mind the overall cost and the clear need for continued restraint in public expenditure, the Government consider that it would not be right to implement the recommendations in full from 1 April 1984. The increases payable from that date for all groups will be 3 per cent., and the recommended rates will be paid from 1 November 1984. Pensions will be based on the salaries actually in payment in accordance with the principle set out in my written answer on 13 April 1984 at column
383. The average increase in pay received by these groups over the 12 months beginning 1 April 1984 is estimated to be for doctors and dentists 4·63 per cent.; for the armed forces 4·92 per cent.; and for the higher Civil Service, senior armed forces officers and the judiciary 4·46 per cent.
In the case of the armed forces and generally for the top salary groups the costs of these increases will be contained within existing departmental programmes. In the case of the NHS groups, health authorities will be expected to find from efficiency savings part of the cost in excess of existing provision and the balance will be charged to the reserve.
The pay rates and scales resulting from these decisions will be promulgated as soon as possible. The Government will be considering separately certain recommendations on points of detail.
Engagements
Q7.
asked the Prime Minister what are her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q8.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q9.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q10.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q11.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q12.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q13.
asked the Prime Minister what are her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q14.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q15.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q16.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q17.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q18.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official duties for 7 June.
Q19.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q20.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q21.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q22.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q23.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q24.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q25.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q26.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q27.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q28.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q29.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q30.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q32.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q33.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q34.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q35.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q36.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q37.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q38.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q39.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q40.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q41.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q43.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q44.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q45.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q46.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q47.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q48.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q49.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q50.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q51.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q52.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q54.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q55.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q56.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q57.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q58.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
Q59.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for 7 June.
Q60.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 7 June.
I have been asked to reply.This morning my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister presided at a meeting of the Cabinet. This afternoon she will be receiving Heads of Government in preparation for the economic summit meeting.
Turkey
Q31.
asked the Prime Minister if she will extend an invitation to the Turkish Head of Slate to visit the United Kingdom.
I have been asked to reply.There are no plans for the President of the Turkish Republic to visit this country in the immediate future.
European Community (Heads Of Government)
Q42.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list the number of times she has had meetings with European Heads of Government since 3 May 1979.
I have been asked to reply.My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister has had 105 such meetings.
Soviet Union
Q53.
asked the Prime Minister when she expects to visit the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and have talks with the Soviet leadership.
I have been asked to reply.My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister has no present plans to visit the Soviet Union.
Atomic Explosions (Western Australia)
asked the Prime Minister what discussions she has had with the Australian Government concerning the atomic explosiions in Western Australia, at Maralinga, in the 1950s; and if she will make a statement.
I have had recent discussions with the Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs on the atomic explosions conducted in Australia in the 1950s. More detailed discussions and exchanges have taken place at both ministerial and official levels. It has been made clear that the British Government will provide to the Australian Government all available information about these atomic explosions, and much of this information is already in Australian hands; only classified material which relates directly to nuclear weapon design will be withheld.
Ec (Budget Refund)
asked the Prime Minister what progress is being made in obtaining a refund from the European Community of the United Kingdom's outstanding budgetary contributions.
Heads of Government in the European Council entered into a clear commitment to pay refunds to the United Kingdom for 1983. We expect the agreement to be honoured and the refunds paid during the current year. We shall not agree to any increase in own resources which does not have as its counterpart a satisfactory budget settlement, including the 1983 refunds.
Dairy Industry
asked the Prime Minister whether the Government will set up a scheme to compensate employees in the dairy industry for the loss of their jobs as a result of the reduction in output consequent upon decisions in the European Economic Community.
Whether there will be any job losses in the dairy industry following the introduction of the supplementary levy arrangements will depend on how the industry decides to adjust to the new supply situation. But provision for the compensation of employees who lose their jobs already exists in the form of the statutory scheme for redundancy payments provided for under the terms of the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978.
Transport
Greenham Common
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a copy of the plans about road widening at Greenham common air base available in the Library.
I am sending a copy of the traffic regulation order and related plan to the hon. Member.
London-Riyadh (Scheduled Air Services)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he is prepared to implement the provisions of section 64(2) of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 to enable a British airline to continue to fly scheduled services between London and Riyadh; and if he will make a statement.
Since the reply I gave to the hon. Member on 11 May, at column 476, consultations between the aeronautical authorities of the United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia have been held, on 26 and 27 May, to consider arrangements for services by British Caledonian Airways between London and Riyadh. Arrangements have been made for a further round of consultations to take place in July. It remains my hope that these consultations will succeed. Use of the provisions of section 64(2) of the Civil Aviation Act enabling the Civil Aviation Authority to grant an exemption from the requirement to hold an air transport licence would be inappropriate in these circumstances.
London Regional Transport
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how Londoners will be informed of the decisions of London Regional Transport; whether its meetings will be open to the public; and whether London's elected local representatives will have access to that body.
Board meetings of nationalised industries, of which London Regional Transport will be one, are not normally open to the public.
LRT will, however, be required by statute to consult local authorities and the London Regional Passengers' Committee (LRPC) in preparing its strategy statement, to publish an annual business plan and an annual report and to inform local authorities and the LRPC of its current plans with respect to the general level of fares and services.
In addition to its statutory obligations, I have no doubt that LRT will want to meet local authorities and the LRPC whenever necessary to discuss matters of mutual concern.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how he will ensure that London Regional Transport has regard to borough council planning policies.
Clause 7 of the London Regional Transport Bill requires LRT to consult London boroughs in the preparation of its strategy statements and to have regard to the development plan for any district which appears to LRT to be affected by any policies, proposals or plans which it proposes to set out in the statement.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he envisages any redundancies in public transport in London as a result of the establishment of London Regional Transport.
Redundancies will be a matter for management decision by the board of London Regional Transport. I note, however, that the options presented by London Transport in the three-year plan for 1985–86 to 1987–88, which it has now submitted to the GLC, all envisage reductions in staff numbers over the period of the plan.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will give details of the extent of the British Rail London network that he proposes to transfer to London Regional Transport under clauses 36 and 37 of the London Regional Transport Bill.
I refer the hon. Member to the statement in paragraph 32 of the White Paper "Public Transport in London" (Cmnd. 9004). We have no plans at present to use the powers in clauses 36 and 37 of the Bill.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what percentage of London Regional Transport costs he intends to set as a target to be covered by fare revenue; and how this compares with the present position in London Transport.
It is not my right hon. Friend's intention to set a target in the form envisaged by the hon. Member. The proportion of London Regional Transport's costs to be met from fare revenue will depend on its success in cutting those costs. The greater its success in this, the easier it will be to hold fare levels down and to make available additional resources for capital investment.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport on what date London Regional Transport will take control of the British Rail network in London in accordance with clauses 36 and 37 of the London Regional Transport Bill if it becoms law.
We have made it clear that the powers in clauses 36 and 37 of the London Regional Transport Bill are reserve powers and that we hope not to have to use them. We have no plans to do so at present.
Traffic Management (London)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport (1) how he will use his reserve and default powers in the event of the London boroughs refusing to establish a voluntary joint committee to deal with traffic management initiatives if the Greater London council is abolished;(2) if he has given any further consideration to his proposals for changes to the trunk road network in Greater London;(3) whether, in the event of the abolition of the Greater London council, he proposes to continue to consult the borough councils, and keep them informed, about the studies on priority schemes for London's roads mentioned in the consultation paper;(4) what authorities would be responsible for strategic traffic policy in London if the Greater London council were abolished;(5) if he will list his reserve and default powers in the event of the London boroughs refusing to establish a voluntary joint committee to deal with traffic management initiatives if the Greater London council is abolished;(6) if he will elaborate on his proposals in the consultation paper for a voluntary joint committee of the borough councils to manage London-wide traffic issues; and if he will make a statement;(7) what arrangements he proposes for the provision of the Greater London transport survey data if the Greater London council is abolished;(8) what provision there will be for the collection and distribution of on and off-street parking data for use in transport planning and for parking policy purposes if the Greater London council is abolished;(9) if he is now able to make a statement on the precise arrangements he proposes for major highway improvements including the Hayes bypass and north-south route in Enfield and Haringey, if the Greater London council is abolished.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply my right hon. Friend gave to him on 24 May 1984 at column 454.
Station Modernisation (London)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will provide appropriate extra finance for British Rail to continue to modernise some of its most dilapidated stations in London, along the lines of the present Greater London council/British Railways programme of modernisation.
Not specifically; but expenditure budgeted by British Rail will be eligible for support, within the annual cash limit, through the Government's public service obligation grant. It will also be open to the London boroughs to provide finance for station improvements in their areas.
Integrated Fare System
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if it is his intention that the recent move towards an integrated fare system and the introduction of the Travelcard should be reversed if the London Regional Transport Bill becomes law.
No.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will allow the Greater London council's proposed extension of the Travelcard to British Rail services in London if the London Regional Transport Bill becomes law.
When the provisions of the London Regional Transport Bill are brought into force, the Greater London council will lose its power to subsidise schemes such as the one it has proposed.
Public Transport Policy (London)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how individual boroughs will be able to influence public transport policy in their own areas and how they will be able to raise finance for individual schemes if the London Regional Transport Bill becomes law.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply my right hon. Friend gave him to the same question of 24 May at column 453.
British Registered Shipping (Persian Gulf)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many vessels registered in the United Kingdom have entered the Persian Gulf since air attacks on shipping began; how many have been subjected to such attacks; what steps he is taking to protect British seamen; and if he will make a statement.
My Department does not keep records of movements of United Kingdom shipping, but, on the data available, we believe that United Kingdom-registered merchant vessels have made about 70 visits to the Gulf since the beginning of February. None of these vessels has been subject to air attack while in the Gulf. The Charming, a Channel Isles registered ship flying the British flag, was attacked on 1 March.The Government have, since the beginning of
hostilities between Iraq and Iran, watched the situation closely. I have no powers to protect British ships or seamen, but I have issued advice through the General Council of British Shipping to British shipowners. Most recently I informed the House on 24 May, at column 459, that my latest advice was:
"The Iran/Iraq conflict continues to present a threat to shipping. A Panamanian vessel was sunk on 19 May following an attack which took place near Kharg Island. The obviously underlines the heightened risks involved in operating in the Gulf. These risks are likely to persist. The Government therefore advises masters and owners to pay particular attention to this development before deciding to send their vessels into this area."
M25 (Reigate-Leatherhead)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when she now expects the Reigate to Leatherhead section of the M25 to be completed; and if he will make a statement.
The contract completion date is 1 July 1985. The actual completion date will depend on the contractor's progress.
British Railways Board
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he has yet settled the amount of the public service obligation grant to be paid to the British Railways Board in 1984; and if he will make a statement.
I am glad to announce that I have accepted the board's claim for central Government PSO grant for 1984 at £837·3 million, subject to adjustment for certain factors to be settled with the board.The claim is £25 million less than the cash limit for 1984 which I set last December, and £18 million less than the board's final claim for 1983. It includes £55 million of transtional expenditure on reducing the underlying cost of running the railway. I welcome the evidence this gives of the progress the board is making to improve the cost effectiveness of the railway and the value for money it represents to customers and the taxpayer.Of the total grant settlement, about £162 million is in respect of the board's inter-city business, £272 million for the London and south-east sector and £403 million for provincial services, excluding those financed separately by the passenger transport executives.
Northern Ireland
Departmental Staff
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many of the employees in his Department are the holders of degrees or diplomas which were awarded by the Open University.
Of the Home Civil Servants within the Northern Ireland Office, two officers have degrees which were awarded by the Open University.In respect of the Northern Ireland Civil Service, the information is not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Dairy Industry
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many registered milk producers in Northern Ireland currently have development plans to extend their enterprise.
Statistical records of approved developmet plans do not readily provide an analysis of the various enterprises on which the plans are based. However, there are currently some 3,500 extant plans of which it is estimated that approximately 60 per cent. include dairy related investments. The promoters of such plans are likely to be registered milk producers although they are not required to identify themselves as such in their application for admission to the development scheme.
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many registered milk producers in Nothern Ireland have completed their five-year development plans to improve their farms.
Since the inception of the farm and horticulture development scheme in 1974, which was replaced by the agriculture and horticulture development scheme in 1980, 1,422 plans which can operate for a period of one to six years have been completed. Registered milk producers are not separately identified on entry to the scheme and statistical records do not provide an analysis of the enterprise on which plans are based. However, it is estimated that approximately 60 per cent—about 850—of the all approved plans are likely to include dairy related investments.
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many registered milk producers applied for grant aid in the past 12 months to expand their herd size under the five-year development programme.
Information specifically about plans by registered milk producers is not readily available. However, in the 12 months ended 31 May 1984, 215 plans, which included dairy related investment, were approved.
Defence
Cruise Missiles
asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he will put a limit on the number of sea-based cruise missiles that can be in British territorial water at any time.
No. Under international law, all ships enjoy the right of innocent passage in territorial waters.
Mining Industry Dispute
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many serving military personnel are working with the police in connection with the current dispute within the mining industry.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to the hon. Member for Barnsley, East (Mr. Patchett) on 21 May 1984, at column 372.
Greenham Common
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what orders are given to patrolling sentries with regard to talking to the Greenham common women.
Service men at RAF Greenham common are briefed to confine exchanges to those necessary in the course of their duties.
Overseas Development
Indonesia
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the meeting of the Inter-Governmental Group on Indonesia held at The Hague on 4 and 5 June.
The delegations reviewed the performance of the Indonesian economy in the difficult circumstances of 1983 and agreed in congratulating the Government on the results of its adjustment measures. The Indonesian delegation introduced the new five-year development plan for 1984–89; and its broad objectives of equity, economic growth and stability were endorsed by the group. It was recognised that Indonesia's development efforts would continue to require considerable external assistance. The British delegation promised continuing technical co-operation to the value of £12·5 million over the next three years, in addition to various other forms of aid. The total of the pledges of official assistance by the members of the group exceeded the World Bank's recommendation of US$2·4 billion.
Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs
Libyan People's Bureau
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what attempts were made by his Department to obtain a clear statement from the Libyan authorities, or from the persons purporting to represent the people's bureau of the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, as to the exact status or functions of the occupants, following the publicly announced take-over of the bureau in St. James's square earlier in the current year; and with what results.
On 20 February 1984 the Libyan Foreign Liaison Bureau told our embassy in Tripoli that a new committee had temporarily assumed charge of the people's bureau in London. We immediately made clear our dissatisfaction at this development. Since it was unacceptable for a diplomatic mission to be run by a committee, we asked the Libyans to nominate an individual in charge. We also said that until this had taken place we would not be able to accept any new notifications of appointment. Those members of the new committee who had not been previously notified to us did not therefore have any diplomatic status.We repeatedly reminded the Libyans of the need to clarify the position and to nominate an individual in charge. In the end, a senior official of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office met two members of the bureau on 11 March. He made it clear that we expected the issue to be resolved without further delay. I reiterated this to Mr. Fitouri on 12 March.After further prompting, Her Majesty's ambassador in Tripoli was informed orally on 8 April that Mr. Muftah Fitouri had been appointed acting secretary. No written confirmation of this had, however, reached the Foreign and Commonwealth Office by 17 April.
Mr Adem Kuwiri
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what response was made by the Libyan authorities to Her Majesty's Government's request for clarification of the Libyan statement that Mr. Adem Kuwiri had ceased to hold the position of chargé d'affaires on 20 February 1984; and, in the absence of any satisfactory explanation, what further diplomatic moves were made to try to resolve the position.
Numerous requests for the notification of the name of the replacement of Mr. Adem Saleh Kuwiri were made in Tripoli and in London. On 23 February the foreign liaison bureau in Tripoli promised to give the British embassy the names of the new committee members later that day. No names were put forward and, in spite of continuing pressure, it was only on 8 April that the foreign liaison bureau in Tripoli informed Her Majesty's ambassador orally that Mr. Muftah M. Fitouri had been temporarily appointed acting secretary of the Libyan people's bureau.
Indonesia
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the dossier on human right violations committed by the Government of Indonesia sent to him by the parliamentary human rights group.
I understand the strength of the concern of the parliamentary human rights concern group on the issues raised in the dossier. However, we do not believe that the Inter-Governmental Group on Indonesia is an appropriate forum to raise the subject, as it suggests.The Indonesian Government are well aware of our general attitude towards human rights violations.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if Her Majesty's Government raised the question of East Timor with the Australian Government at the recent inter-governmental conference on Indonesia held at The Hague.
As far as the inter-governmental conference is concerned, I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to his earlier question. I have, however, had recent bilateral discussions with the Australian Foreign Minister about matters of mutual interest to the region, including Indonesia.
Trade And Industry
Kearney And Trecker Marwin Ltd
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what plans he has for the Government's shareholding in Kearney and Trecker Marwin Ltd.
The Department's holding of 1,233,935 "C" redeemable preference shares of £ 1 each was redeemed by the company in 1983.Under arrangements made in 1976 the Department still holds 800,000 "B" redeemable preference shares of £1 each and 100,000 "D" redeemable preference shares of £l each. The terms of the 1976 arrangements require these shares to be redeemed by 31 December 1986.The Department keeps its shareholding under regular review.
Jobs And Exports
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will estimate the statistical correlation between the value of United Kingdom exports and the number of jobs in the United Kingdom, indicating how much correlation is established.
United Kingdom employment levels are affected by many factors, of which the level of exports is only one. It would be very difficult to identify the relationship between the level of exports and employment in isolation from all the other influences on employment levels.
Silica Sand
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he is satisfied that there is sufficient competition in the United Kingdom silica sand extraction industry.
The Director General of Fair Trading is responsible for keeping competition in trade and industry under review, and he has the power to initiate investigations of monopoly situations and anti-competitive practices. I understand that he has no evidence of lack of competition in the silica sand extraction industry that would justify an investigation.
Dunlop Rubber Co Ltd
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what steps he is taking to ensure that British interests are protected following negotiations between Dunlop Rubber Co. Ltd. and Sumitomo for the takeover of Dunlop's tyre interests by the Japanese group; and if he will make a statement.
I see no basis for intervening in the arrangements concluded between Dunlop and Sumitomo, which are commercial matters between the companies. They should result in the retention of more soundly based employment than would otherwise be the case.
Ship Wireless Licences
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how long his Department is currently taking to deal with applications for the issue of ship wireless licences.
Five to six weeks during the current peak licensing period.
Manufactures
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether he will publish in the Official Report a table showing imports and exports of manufactures less precious stones from the European Economic Community in the first four months of 1984 compared with the first four months of 1983; and if he will gross up the 1984 figure at an annual rate and compare it with the figure for 1983.
Balance of payments-based estimates are not available monthly. Figures on the Overseas Trade Statistics basis are in the table; estimates derived from annualised data are unreliable.
| United Kingdom trade with the European Community: Manufactures* less precious stones‡ | ||||
| (Overseas Trade Statistics basis) | ||||
| £ million, not seasonally adjusted | ||||
| Exports | Imports | |||
| 1983 | 1984 | 1983 | 1984 | |
| January—April | 4,728 | 5,348 | 7,360 | 8,605 |
| Year | 14,640 | ‡16,000 | 22,811 | ‡25,800 |
| *Standard International Trade Classification sections 5 to 8. | ||||
| †Standard International Trade Classification division 667. | ||||
| ‡Estimate based on January—April at annual rate. | ||||
Source: Overseas Trade Statistics.
Copperclad Aluminium Cables
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether he has had any reports of failure or inadequacy in copper-clad aluminium cables; and if he will make a statement.
No such reports have been drawn to my attention.
Union Of Communications Workers
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will ensure that no impediment is placed by the Government on the pay negotiations currently proceeding between the Union of Communications Workers and the Post Office.
The pay negotiations are a matter for the Post Office.
British Aerospace
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what is the Government's policy towards the announcement by the General Electric Company about the company's discussions with British Aerospace of the possible acquisition of the share capital of British Aerospace by the General Electric Company.
I made a statement to the House on 16 May about the Government's attitude towards the announcement of discussions between Thorn EMI and British Aerospace. The considerations set out in that statement would also apply to any proposal to acquire the share capital of BAe put to the shareholders of BAe by GEC. Subject to the considerations being satisfied, the Government's policy towards any proposals made by GEC to the shareholders of BAe would be the same as that set out in the final paragraph of my statement.
Environment
National Mobility Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the effectiveness of the national mobility scheme; and which local authorities are not actively taking part.
Since the scheme was introduced in 1981, 12,713 moves across county boundaries have been recorded, and 25,134 moves within counties, of which 21,408 were under the long established arrangements for moves within London. In England only two councils do not participate in the scheme, Torbay and Liverpool.
Building Research Establishment
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will make a statement on the work to date of the new panel of visitors advising the Building Research Establishment which he announced to the House on 28 July 1983; and whether he will list the names of those serving on the panel.
The constitution, terms of reference and operation of the BRE visitors panel are agreed and appointments are now completed. The following will serve as panel members:
- Dr. R. E. Rowe, CBE
- Professor R. W. K. Honeycombe, FRS
- K. Newman, BSc, MICE
- D. Quinion, BSc
- P. A. Green, BSc, FICE
- D. W. Lazenby, DIC, FICE, FIStructE
- C. Izzard, FCIBS
- Professor V. B. Torrance
- D. Lush
- Professor P. Gray, FRS
- Dr. W. A. Allen, CBE, FRIBA
- Sir Kenneth Holland, CBE, QFSM
- Dr. D. S. Belford Professor
- T. Markus Dr. W. W L. Chan
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will make a statement on progress to date on transferring the facilities of the Princes Risborough laboratory to the Building Research Establishment, Garston; what is the programme of work for 1984–85 of the laboratory; what financial and staffing resources have been allocated specifically for timber research during the 1984–85 financial year; and how they compare with the 1983–84 outturn.
Regarding the move of the Princes Risborough laboratory, further detailed studies for accommodating the full range of PRL facilities at Garston have been completed and a satisfactory scheme has been agreed. I have recently received a deputation from trade union representatives who wished to represent to me their views on the proposal to move PRL. I have decided that the move should be made. The current programme envisages completion by autumn 1987.The 1984–85 programme of work of the Princes Risborough laboratory will be described in the Building Research Establishment's research programme 1984–85 which is due to be published on 8 June. I will send my hon. Friend a copy of this publication.Thirty-four staff will be working on timber research in the 1984–85 financial year compared with 31 staff last year. BRE's outturn expenditure on timber research in 1983–84 was £1,075,210 including the costs of work carried out in-house and that carried out externally. The comparable figure for 1984–85 will be approximately £1,248,000.
Housing Expenditure (London)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish details in the Official
| Housing Investment Programme Allocations and Prescribed Proportion of Housing Capital Receipts | ||||||
| £ million cash | ||||||
| Authority | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | 1984–85 | ||
| Allocation | Receipts | Allocation | Receipts | Allocation | Allocation | |
| Barking | 3·2 | 1·5 | 3·7 | 5·8 | 2·6 | 2·5 |
| Barnet | 8·3 | 2·9 | 8·7 | 4·4 | 6·8 | 6·6 |
| Bexley | 5·2 | n/a | 5·7 | 3·1 | 5·0 | 4·8 |
| Brent | 24·0 | 2·3 | 27·1 | 3·8 | 24·6 | 26·1 |
| Bromley | 6·6 | 3·4 | 7·2 | 7·0 | 5·2 | 5·1 |
| Camden | 34·5 | 4·0 | 35·1 | 7·5 | 33·5 | 33·1 |
| Croydon | 8·2 | 2·5 | 9·3 | 3·5 | 8·1 | 7·8 |
| Ealing | 13·9 | 3·6 | 17·5 | 6·4 | 14·5 | 15·1 |
| Enfield | 8·3 | 1·5 | 9·4 | 3·4 | 7·0 | 6·8 |
| Greenwich | 14·9 | 1·3 | 16·8 | 15·1 | 14·5 | 16·1 |
| Hackney | 21·6 | 1·0 | 36·3 | 2·2 | 23·6 | 26·4 |
| Hammersmith | 17·1 | 4·6 | 24·9 | 4·6 | 18·8 | 18·8 |
| Haringey | 27·5 | 3·0 | 35·4 | 4·8 | 29·6 | 31·3 |
| Harrow | 4·0 | 1·3 | 6·2 | 2·1 | 4·0 | 5·1 |
| Havering | 3·8 | 2·2 | 4·1 | 5·3 | 3·2 | 3·1 |
| Hillingdon | 8·9 | 5·6 | 9·1 | 10·3 | 8·4 | 8·1 |
| Hounslow | 9·7 | 0·7 | 9·8 | 3·6 | 8·0 | 9·5 |
| Islington | 34·6 | 4·3 | 56·0 | 5·1 | 35·1 | 34·5 |
Report of (a) the loan sanctions granted to London boroughs for housing capital expenditure from 1971–72 to 1977–78, inclusive, (b) the loan sanctions granted to London boroughs for non-housing capital expenditure from 1971–72 to 1980–81, inclusive, (c) the housing investment programme allocations and, where appropriate, the prescribed housing capital receipts, for each London borough from 1978–79 to 1984–85, inclusive, and (d) the non-housing capital allocations and the prescribed non-housing capital receipts for each London borough from 1981–82 to 1984–85, inclusive.
The information available is given in the tables. Data on (a) and (b) are not held centrally.
| Housing Investment Programme Allocations (£ million at cash prices) | ||||
| 1977–78 | 1978–79 | 1979–80 | 1980–81 | |
| Barking | 2·5 | 2·5 | 5·5 | 4·1 |
| Barnet | 16·2 | 13·3 | 12·0 | 9·0 |
| Bexley | 2·9 | 3·2 | 5·5 | 5·8 |
| Brent | 25·0 | 29·2 | 31·4 | 27·6 |
| Bromley | 7·4 | 9·1 | 9·7 | 8·1 |
| Camden | 47·8 | 52·0 | 57·8 | 44·7 |
| Croydon | 7·4 | 6·7 | 9·1 | 8·4 |
| Ealing | 15·1 | 16·2 | 18·2 | 17·4 |
| Enfield | 10·4 | 10·4 | 11·9 | 10·4 |
| Greenwich | 21·5 | 23·5 | 25·9 | 20·4 |
| Hackney | 27·1 | 30·1 | 30·3 | 30·4 |
| Hammersmith | 18·5 | 22·4 | 24·1 | 21·7 |
| Haringey | 29·2 | 34·4 | 31·5 | 34·7 |
| Harrow | 5·9 | 5·2 | 6·6 | 5·0 |
| Havering | 5·5 | 5·1 | 4·2 | 5·2 |
| Hillingdon | 22·6 | 23·5 | 15·6 | 11·8 |
| Hounslow | 14·7 | 15·5 | 14·1 | 12·2 |
| Islington | 42·5 | 50·3 | 53·9 | 48·2 |
| Kensington | 16·6 | 24·5 | 29·7 | 27·1 |
| Kingston | 2·9 | 2·7 | 2·6 | 2·6 |
| Lambeth | 39·2 | 43·0 | 56·3 | 54·9 |
| Lewisham | 24·9 | 30·9 | 35·6 | 29·0 |
| Merton | 12·2 | 10·1 | 9·2 | 9·7 |
| Newham | 16·7 | 18·9 | 25·9 | 25·7 |
| Redbridge | 5·8 | 5·4 | 6·0 | 6·9 |
| Richmond | 4·9 | 6·2 | 6·1 | 5·4 |
| Southwark | 43·1 | 47·7 | 54·1 | 41·7 |
| Sutton | 6·0 | 4·5 | 5·4 | 4·0 |
| Tower Hamlets | 13·4 | 14·4 | 13·8 | 12·6 |
| Waltham Forest | 12·9 | 12·7 | 17·0 | 12·9 |
| Wandsworth | 29·4 | 32·8 | 26·6 | 24·7 |
| Westminster | 16·1 | 17·6 | 18·3 | 20·7 |
£ million cash
| ||||||
Authority
| 1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84
| 1984–85
| ||
Allocation
| Receipts
| Allocation
| Receipts
| Allocation
| Allocation
| |
| Kensington | 19·3 | 2·0 | 24·0 | 3·2 | 18·0 | 18·0 |
| Kingston | 2·4 | 1·2 | 3·4 | 2·5 | 2·1 | 2·1 |
| Lambeth | 39·7 | 1·0 | 43·3 | 3·2 | 41·0 | 40·2 |
| Lewisham | 23·4 | 1·3 | 25·9 | 4·3 | 23·9 | 24·6 |
| Merton | 6·7 | 3·6 | 7·5 | 4·1 | 6·3 | 5·1 |
| Newham | 1·8 | 2·6 | 22·2 | 10·2 | 20·3 | 23·3 |
| Redbridge | 4·9 | 3·1 | 5·1 | 4·1 | 3·9 | 4·7 |
| Richmond | 4·7 | 1·9 | 5·6 | 3·8 | 4·5 | 4·2 |
| Southwark | 26·5 | 11·0 | 41·5 | 6·8 | 31·8 | 31·0 |
| Sutton | 2·9 | 1·9 | 3·7 | 3·2 | 2·5 | 2·5 |
| Tower Hamlets | 6·5 | 0·4 | 10·5 | 1·6 | 12·0 | 12·3 |
| Waltham Forest | 9·1 | 2·6 | 9·1 | 4·4 | 8·6 | 8·9 |
| Wandsworth | 17·7 | 9·2 | 21·2 | 9·1 | 18·4 | 19·3 |
| Westminster | 16·5 | 2·0 | 18·3 | 3·7 | 17·0 | 17·3 |
Notes:
(i) 1981–82 allocations to Newham, Southwark and Tower Hamlets reflected the expected level of receipts from the London Docklands Development Corporation.
(ii) Authorities have since 1 April 1981 been free to increase their allocations on account of the prescribed proportion of their capital receipts.
(iii) Additional allocations may be made retrospectively for 1983–84 for expenditure on improvement grants and on enveloping schemes in the light of outturn information.
(iv) Information is not yet available on 1983–84 full year receipts.
Non-Housing Capital Allocations
| ||||
£ million cash
| ||||
Authority
| Transport
| Education
| Personal Social Services
| Other Services
|
1981–82
| ||||
| Barking | 0·283 | 2·661 | 0·264 | 0·857 |
| Barnet | 0·301 | 5·102 | 0·580 | 1·388 |
| Bexley | 1·816 | 0·932 | 0·397 | 1·082 |
| Brent | 1·541 | 1·176 | 0·566 | 1·851 |
| Bromley | 0·959 | 1·569 | 0·581 | 1·529 |
| Camden | 0·520 | — | 0·782 | 1·448 |
| Croydon | 0·878 | 0·581 | 0·640 | 1·390 |
| Ealing | 2·174 | 1·465 | 0·484 | 1·959 |
| Enfield | 0·290 | 1·077 | 0·056 | 1·181 |
| Greenwich | 1·097 | — | 2·097 | 7·260 |
| Hackney | 0·371 | — | 0·759 | 4·596 |
| Hammersmith | 1·138 | — | 0·914 | 2·521 |
| Haringey | 0·394 | 2·403 | 0·418 | 1·697 |
| Harrow | 0·875 | 0·543 | 0·364 | 1·077 |
| Havering | 0·399 | 0·373 | 0·377 | 2·861 |
| Hillingdon | 1·943 | 1·719 | 0·987 | 1·167 |
| Hounslow | 0·583 | 1·983 | 0·181 | 1·110 |
| Islington | 0·342 | — | 0·335 | 3·579 |
| Kensington | 0·194 | — | 0·204 | 0·824 |
| Kingston | 0·973 | 1·315 | 0·248 | 0·927 |
| Lambeth | 1·499 | — | 0·382 | 5·405 |
| Lewisham | 0·589 | — | 0·707 | 2·895 |
| Merton | 0·237 | 0·712 | 0·206 | 0·817 |
| Newham | 1·750 | 3·163 | 2·000 | 3·324 |
| Redbridge | 0·742 | 0·545 | 0·451 | 1·065 |
| Richmond | 0·290 | 1·320 | 0·143 | 0·843 |
| Southwark | 2·629 | — | 0·727 | 7·316 |
| Sutton | 2·007 | 0·196 | 0·111 | 0·889 |
| Tower Hamlets | 0·825 | — | 1·066 | 5·646 |
| Waltham Forest | 0·354 | 1·710 | 0·572 | 1·247 |
| Wandsworth | 0·221 | — | 1·404 | 1·629 |
| Westminster | 5·182 | — | 0·372 | 1·877 |
1982–83
| ||||
| Barking | 0·134 | 3·126 | 0·304 | 0·652 |
| Barnet | 0·489 | 3·604 | 0·744 | 1·259 |
| Bexley | 3·451 | 0·679 | 0·559 | 1·543 |
| Brent | 0·215 | 1·782 | 0·186 | 6·434 |
| Bromley | 0·703 | 0·947 | 0·222 | 1·433 |
| Camden | 0·251 | — | 0·072 | 1·288 |
| Croydon | 1·063 | 0·358 | 0·633 | 1·424 |
| Ealing | 2·056 | 1·817 | 0·723 | 2·394 |
| Enfield | 0·239 | 0·457 | 0·203 | 1·253 |
| Greenwich | 0·267 | — | 1·319 | 6·045 |
| Hackney | 1·765 | — | 1·350 | 17·060 |
| Hammersmith | 0·379 | — | 1·553 | 6·929 |
Authority
| Transport
| Education
| Personal Social Services
| Other Services
|
| Haringey | 0·253 | 3·106 | 0·483 | 2·045 |
| Harrow | 1·678 | 0·577 | 0·947 | 1·927 |
| Havering | 0·703 | 0·390 | 0·512 | 3·029 |
| Hillingdon | 3·922 | 1·685 | 1·202 | 1·109 |
| Hounslow | 1·072 | 2·263 | 0·190 | 1·346 |
| Islington | 0·611 | — | 0·636 | 8·909 |
| Kensington | 0·412 | — | 0·451 | 0·899 |
| Kingston | 1·723 | 1·982 | 0·486 | 0·801 |
| Lambeth | 0·503 | — | 1·014 | 6·179 |
| Lewisham | 0·397 | — | 1·063 | 2·364 |
| Merton | 1·136 | 0·386 | 0·223 | 3·456 |
| Newham | 1·875 | 2·501 | 2·092 | 1·966 |
| Redbridge | 1·547 | 0·912 | 0·463 | 1·151 |
| Richmond | 0·160 | 0·611 | 0·401 | 1·092 |
| Southwark | 4·446 | — | 1·370 | 9·297 |
| Sutton | 1·005 | 0·157 | 0·202 | 0·878 |
| Tower Hamlets | 0·684 | — | 1·346 | 2·556 |
| Waltham Forest | 1·312 | 1·761 | 1·171 | 1·780 |
| Wandsworth | 0·595 | — | 0·739 | 3·509 |
| Westminster | 4·319 | — | 0·301 | 1·979 |
1983–84
| ||||
| Barking | 0·221 | 2·928 | 0·307 | 0·650 |
| Barnet | 0·392 | 1·538 | 0·841 | 1·573 |
| Bexley | 2·307 | 1·633 | 0·253 | 1·251 |
| Brent | 0·542 | 1·180 | 0·998 | 4·007 |
| Bromley | 1·499 | 0·841 | 0·349 | 1·596 |
| Camden | 0·318 | — | 0·200 | 1·258 |
| Croyden | 0·597 | 0·800 | 0·477 | 1·392 |
| Ealing | 2·078 | 0·693 | 0·655 | 2·164 |
| Enfield | 0·243 | 0·311 | 0·225 | 1·213 |
| Greenwich | 0·000 | — | 0·541 | 3·037 |
| Hackney | 0·472 | — | 0·697 | 8·382 |
| Hammersmith | 3·073 | — | 1·249 | 3·664 |
| Haringey | 0·351 | 1·597 | 0·597 | 1·369 |
| Harrow | 2·779 | 0·305 | 0·652 | 0·973 |
| Havering | 0·500 | 0·299 | 0·713 | 1·193 |
| Hillingdon | 4·870 | 0·896 | 0·894 | 1·118 |
| Hounslow | 0·412 | 2·611 | 0·260 | 1·237 |
| Islington | 0·404 | — | 0·643 | 6·548 |
| Kensington | 0·651 | — | 0·442 | 1·137 |
| Kingston | 1·933 | 2·270 | 0·513 | 1·062 |
| Lambeth | 0·739 | — | 0·600 | 7·693 |
| Lewisham | 0·341 | — | 0·917 | 1·574 |
| Merton | 2·329 | 0·408 | 0·089 | 2·774 |
| Newham | 1·580 | 2·084 | 0·933 | 1·376 |
| Redbridge | 1·241 | 0·872 | 0·387 | 0·999 |
| Richmond | 0·192 | 0·557 | 0·384 | 0·641 |
| Southwark | 3·114 | — | 0·618 | 3·312 |
| Sutton | 0·864 | 0·266 | 0·551 | 0·812 |
| Tower Hamlets | 1·105 | — | 0·663 | 2·437 |
| Waltham Forest | 0·837 | 1·624 | 0·849 | 1·161 |
| Wandsworth | 0·427 | — | 1·140 | 2·536 |
| Westminster | 2·800 | — | 0·278 | 1·871 |
1984–85
| ||||
| Barking | 0·136 | 1·442 | 0·690 | 0·640 |
| Barnet | 0·112 | 2·453 | 0·590 | 1·268 |
| Bexley | 2·912 | 0·845 | 0·481 | 1·124 |
| Brent | 0·515 | 1·678 | 1·155 | 1·501 |
| Bromley | 0·440 | 0·492 | 0·606 | 1·422 |
| Camden | 0·086 | — | 0·470 | 1·430 |
| Croyden | 0·459 | 1·227 | 0·781 | 1·423 |
| Ealing | 0·657 | 1·347 | 0·547 | 1·229 |
| Enfield | 0·137 | 0·576 | 0·308 | 1·177 |
| Greenwich | 0·000 | — | 1·099 | 1·107 |
| Hackney | 0·101 | — | 1·011 | 0·962 |
| Hammersmith | 0·452 | — | 1·154 | 1·030 |
| Haringey | 0·105 | 1·090 | 0·472 | 1·117 |
| Harrow | 4·260 | 0·523 | 0·992 | 0·934 |
| Havering | 0·882 | 0·216 | 0·485 | 1·095 |
| Hillingdon | 3·264 | 1·068 | 1·401 | 1·136 |
| Hounslow | 1·239 | 3·063 | 0·484 | 0·901 |
| Islington | 0·193 | — | 1·185 | 1·149 |
| Kensington | 0·343 | — | 0·293 | 0·778 |
| Kingston | 1·195 | 1·330 | 0·059 | 0·956 |
Authority
| Transport
| Education
| Personal Social Services
| Other Services
|
| Lambeth | 0·154 | — | 1·438 | 1·664 |
| Lewisham | 0·243 | — | 1·037 | 1·203 |
| Merton | 1·558 | 0·993 | 0·076 | 1·294 |
| Newham | 1·173 | 2·039 | 1·150 | 1·367 |
| Redbridge | 0·160 | 1·006 | 0·527 | 1·165 |
| Richmond | 0·336 | 0·735 | 0·344 | 0·714 |
| Southwark | 0·963 | — | 0·692 | 1·076 |
| Sutton | 1·215 | 0·451 | 0·463 | 0·759 |
| Tower Hamlets | 0·152 | — | 1·136 | 1·076 |
| Waltham Forest | 0·352 | 0·889 | 0·702 | 0·942 |
| Wandsworth | 0·496 | — | 1·045 | 1·301 |
| Westminster | 5.389 | — | 0·415 | 1·691 |
Note: Details of urban aid block allocations not yet available.
Prescribed proportion of non housing capital receipts
| ||
£ million cash
| ||
Authority
| 1981–82
| 1982–83
|
| Barking | 0·4 | 1·0 |
| Barnet | N/A | 1·1 |
| Bexley | N/A | 0·8 |
| Brent | 6·7 | 0·2 |
| Bromley | 4·8 | 3·6 |
| Camden | 6·5 | 5·7 |
| Croydon | 21·9 | 6·7 |
| Ealing | 6·6 | 3·4 |
| Enfield | 0·7 | 1·1 |
| Greenwich | 1·5 | N/A |
| Hackney | 0·3 | N/A |
| Hammersmith | 6·3 | 1·4 |
| Haringey | 1·6 | 2·1 |
| Harrow | 2·2 | 0·9 |
| Havering | 0·7 | 1·1 |
| Hillingdon | 6·0 | 18·6 |
| Hounslow | 1·9 | 2·8 |
| Islington | 1·3 | 0·7 |
| Kensington | 1·6 | 0·3 |
| Kingston | 1·9 | 3·3 |
| Lambeth | 0·7 | 2·5 |
| Lewisham | 0·6 | 0·5 |
| Merton | 1·0 | 0·3 |
| Newham | 3·7 | 0·9 |
| Redbridge | 1·1 | 1·8 |
| Richmond | 1·6 | 0·7 |
| Southwark | 3·7 | 9·4 |
| Sutton | 4·2 | 2·0 |
| Tower Hamlets | 2·2 | 0·6 |
| Waltham Forest | 0·9 | 0·5 |
| Wandsworth | 2·8 | 1·9 |
| Westminster | 2·9 | 6·4 |
Note: Information is not yet available on 1983–84 full year receipts.
Housing (Fire Escapes)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has yet completed his consultations about the means of escape from fire in houses in multiple occupation; and if he will make a statement.
I refer my hon. Friend to the reply of 2 May, at column 148, by my hon. Friend the Minister for Housing and Construction.
Royal Docks (Industrial Relocation)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what is the number of firms in that portion of the royal docks owned by the London Docklands development corporation who have already been requested to relocate and whom the corporation intends to relocate, respectively; and if the firms concerned or other statutory bodies have or will be informed of the purposes of any such request;(2) what is the number of firms in the area of the royal docks who have been requested to relocate by the London Docklands development corporation or other statutory body since 1 January 1983; if the London borough of Newham was informed of any such requests and the reasons for them, respectively; how many firms so affected were relocated inside and outside the docks area, respectively; and if financial assistance was available.
Thirteen firms, all of which are tenants on land owned by LDDC in the royal docks, have been requested to consider relocation and it is intended to approach two more. There are nine other firms in operation in the Royal Victoria dock which it is not currently considered necessary to relocate. The purpose of relocation would be to make way for major infrastructure works needed to bring new roads and replacement services into the area in order to support any major regeneration scheme and attract new jobs. The firms concerned are informed that advice is available from LDDC's business development officers and the London borough of Newham's industrial liaison officer. Compensation is offered analogous to the disturbance payment provisions of the Land Compensation Act 1973 together, where appropriate, with other forms of assistance to businesses under the Inner Urban Area Act 1978.
Lddc (Grant-Applications)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has as to the number of grant applications made by the London borough of Newham to the London Docklands development corporation in respect of small businesses which have been refused; if in each case a visit was made to the firm in question; and if reasons for any refusal were given to the borough of Newham.
LDDC has dealt with requests for assistance from 37 firms in the Newham area of docklands of which four applications, all involving sites in the royal docks, have been refused. No visits were made to the firms concerned by LDDC's business development officers as such visits are carried out where necessary by borough officers. I understand that the borough of Newham, which processes grant applications in the area under arrangements agreed with LDDC, is aware that requests for assistance are unlikely to be supported by LDDC if the purpose is to enable firms to set up or expand in areas where the possibility of redevelopment within five years is foreseen. The corporation is, of course, willing to consider requests for assistance in respect of alternative locations in the area.
Royal Albert Docks
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has as to the approximate area in square feet within the 1¼ miles of north quay of the Royal Albert docks which is appropriate for use as a cargo shed, engineering workshop, canteen, office or welfare facilities, respectively; and what are the numbers of units currently let, together with an estimate of the number of full-length containers that could be stacked on suitable hard standing.
There are 24 commercial tenants on the north quay of the Royal Albert dock occupying some 460,000 sq. ft. of accommodation. The information to answer the rest of the hon. Member's question is not available.
Royal Docks (Demolition)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has as to the demolition work in progress, or planned, by the London Docklands development corporation in that portion of the royal docks owned by the corporation; and if the corporation has informed the London borough of Newham or local residents of the purpose of any such demolition.
The corporation wrote to both the London borough of Newham and the Docklands Forum on 9 December 1983 informing them that LDDC intended to demolish certain unusable tin sheds, some of which were in a dangerous state, together with a number of small brick buildings. This demolition work is still in progress. No decisions have been taken about the possibility of further demolitions in the Royal Victoria dock, where studies are under way on the usefulness of the remaining buildings.
London Docklands (Public Open Space)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has as to what consultations have taken place between the London Docklands development corporation and the London borough of Newham concerning the provisions of any additional waterside public open space on the north bank of the River Thames between Bow and Barking Creeks.
Regular informal discussions take place between LDDC and the London borough of Newham. Amongst the issues raised has been the possibility of more open space in north Woolwich. I understand that LDDC also fully supports the GLC and Newham's intentions that the surplus Thames barrier lands should be laid out as open space.
Royal Docks (Shipping Access)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if, in pursuit of its policy encouraging waterborne transport, it is the intention of the London Docklands development corporation to encourage, or to ensure, the continued access to the royal group of docks of ships up to 800 ft in length.
I understand that LDDC has no proposals to alter or to discourage the use of the King George V shiplock and other port equipment needed to enable ships that have hitherto been able to enter the royal docks to continue to do so. These installations are the responsibility of the Port of London Authority.
Royal Docks (Connaught Swing Bridge)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has as to the action taken by the London Docklands development corporation concerning the maintenance, repair, or adaptation of the Connaught swing bridge in the royal docks and at which respective dates; from what date the bridge was non-operational; when it is expected to be so; and what estimate has been made of the costs (a) to convert the railway to a roadway and (b) to restore the bridge to operation.
The Connaught road swing bridge, which is understood to be no longer operational, is the property of the Port of London Authority and it is responsible for its maintenance and repair. The LDDC has commissioned two studies of the structure. One, carried out by the London borough of Newham and received by LDDC in January 1984, was concerned with the feasibility of converting the railway part of the bridge width to a roadway. A later study by engineering consultants has been examining a wide range of measures to improve transport access across the Connaught cut area and is still in progress.The cost of converting the railway part of the bridge width to a roadway has been estimated at £.510,000. LDDC does not have an estimate of the costs of restoring he bridge to operation, but restoration is under consideration as part of wider studies of means of crossing the Connaught area.
Sewerage Schemes
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish a table showing the amount of grants paid from Treasury funds towards the cost of sewerage schemes in rural areas in the year 1973–74 and in the year 1982–83 at the 1973–74 price base.
The following are the figures for England:
| Year | Total RWSSA grant £ |
| 1973–74 | 5,058,000 |
| 1982–83 | *3,729,000 |
| * This is revalued to the 1973–74 price base using the public works (non-roads) index. | |
London Borough Of Barnet (Central Government Funds)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what was the total of central Government funds paid to the London Borough of Barnet in each year between and including 1978–79 to 1983–84; and what is his latest estimate for 1984–85.
The available information is given in the table.
£ million
| |||||||
1978–79
| 1979–80
| 1980–81
| 1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84
| 1984–85
| |
| 1. Grants taken to rate fund revenue account* | |||||||
| RSG† | 39·2 | 42·8 | 49·6 | 48·2 | 48·5 | 41·7 | 37·5 |
| Specific grants‡ | 5·8 | 6·3 | 7·6 | 7·9 | 7·1 | 7·1 | 7·5 |
| Rate rebates grant | 0·8 | 1·0 | 1·3 | 1·9 | 3·0 | ║3·4 | ║3·7 |
| 2. Housing subsidies | |||||||
| Housing subsidy¶ | 4·2 | 6·7 | 6·8 | 4·5 | 2·0 | 1·5 | 0·3 |
| Modified rent rebates¶ | 1·1 | 1·3 | 1·9 | 2·1 | 2·8 | — | — |
| 3. Capital grants | 1·2 | 2·4 | 0·8 | 0·6 | 0·7 | — | — |
* Figures for 1978–79 to 1982–83 are derived from the authority's outturn returns. Those for 1983–84 and 1984–85 are derived from the authority's budget returns. | |||||||
| † The figures for 1978–79 to 1980–81 comprise the needs and resources and domestic elements. For later years they comprise block grant and domestic rate relief grant. In the years 1978–79 to 1981–82, grant allocated in respect of expenditure by London precepting authorities was paid directly to the London boroughs. In 1982–83, grant allocated in respect of the Metropolitan police authority was paid to the boroughs. Since 1983–84, London boroughs have received grant only in respect of their own expenditure. | |||||||
| ‡ For 1978–79 to 1982–83 the figures include all relevant (for RSG purposes) and non-relevant specific grants. For 1983–84 and 1984–85 they include relevant grants and mandatory student awards grant. | |||||||
| ║ Estimated from budget returns. | |||||||
| ¶ Figures for 1978–79 to 1981–82 are based on final audited claims. Figures for 1982–83 are pre-audit. Figures for 1983–84 and 1984–85 are provisional. | |||||||
| Including some housing association grants. | |||||||
Woodlands
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what data his Department has received from the Nature Conservancy Council concerning the loss of broadleaved woodland in England, Scotland and Wales.
I have not received from the Nature Conservancy Council any information relating to loss of broadleaved woodlands in general. However, some data on changes in areas of such woodlands are contained in the consultative paper on "Broadleaves in Britain" recently published by the Forestry Commission.
Unitary Development Plans
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has any plans to introduce unitary district development plans into the non-metropolitan counties in England and Wales.
No.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if the London boroughs will have a statutory duty to prepare the unitary development plans he announced on 4 May; and what extra staff resources he expects they will require to do this.
Under the proposed arrangements each London borough would only be required by statute to prepare a unitary development plan for its area upon the making of a commencement order by the Secretary of State. This would not be issued until a new plan for the area was necessary. It will be for individual boroughs to decide what staff resources should be allocated to the preparation of the plans.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how long he expects it to be before the current Greater London development plan is superseded by the 33 adopted unitary borough development plans which he is now proposing.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply that my hon. Friend gave him on 24 May at column 466.
London Planning Commission
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will announce the terms of reference of his proposed London planning commission, the composition of its membership, the time scale for it to prepare its advisory strategic guidance for London once it is established and the staffing resources it will require to do this.
Decisions on these matters remain to be taken.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if the proposed London planning commission will be required to vet each unitary borough development plan before it is adopted by the responsible borough council; if it will appear at inquiries into such plans in order to ensure that strategic policies are given their due weight; and what monitoring by the commission of borough planning decisions will be necessary to ensure the successful implementation of strategic policies.
The role of the London planning commission will be purely advisory, and it will have no powers in relation to the borough councils.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will bring forward proposals to enforce the non-statutory advice of the proposed London planning commission if the Greater London council is abolished.
No.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when the London planning commission will be set up and what will be its proposed membership from (a) the private sector, (b) environment groups, (c) local authorities and (d) trades unions.
Decisions on these matters remain to be taken.
Greater London Development Plan
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what views he has received from each of the London boroughs on bringing up to date the Greater London development plan.
In its response to the White Paper "Streamlining the Cities", Islington has expressed the view that it would not be economic to abandon the GLC's draft alterations to the Greater London development plan. No other views from London boroughs have been received.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will estimate the cost of abandoning the work carried out by officers in his Department and the Greater London council of updating the Greater London development plan.
No.
Local Government Reform
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what will be the effect on the implementation and monitoring of the Department of the Environment's circular 21/82 "Guidelines for Aggregate Provision in England and Wales", in the event of the abolition of the Greater London council.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to him on 24 May, at column 464.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment, in the event of the abolition of the Greater London council, what arrangements he proposes to make for the provision of scientific services on a metropolitan scale.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my right hon. Friend, in reply to a question from my hon. Friend the Member for Bury, North (Mr. Burt) on 4 May, at columns 264–66.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment, in the event of the abolition of the Greater London council, what authority will service the office of Lord Lieutenant of London.
The Government are consulting representatives of the Lords Lieutenants about arrangements for support after the abolition of the GLC and the metropolitan county councils.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will clarify the Government's policy on grant-related expenditure assessments for those boroughs which inherit a rate burden greater than current expenditure levels approved by the Government in the event of the abolition of the Greater London council.
The boroughs will need increased GREs to take account of the functions they take on from the GLC. These will be determined on the same principles as apply to authorities elsewhere in the country, subject to allowances for higher labour costs in London. The Government would be glad to consider representations about GREs for specific services.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the London borough councils counted as being in favour of the proposal and those counted as being against the proposal in table 4 (housing) of part II of the report of the consultation on "Streamlining the Cities", Cmnd. 9063.
I shall answer this question shortly.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment which local authority association is counted as against the proposal in table 4 (Housing) of part II of the report of the consultation on "Streamlining the Cities", Cmnd. 9063.
I must ask the hon. Member to seek the views of the local authority associations direct.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many responses to the Government's consultation paper "Streamlining the Cities: Housing" supported the proposal to repeal without replacement the Greater London council's statutory duty to undertake and provide housing research and information; and how many expressed concern about it or opposed it.
One and 26 responses, respectively.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many of the responses received from other groups and individuals referred to in table 4 (housing) of part II of the report of the consultation on "Streamlining the Cities", Cmnd. 9063, concerned Greater London council provision for the single homeless.
Out of all the responses received from bodies other than local authorities and their associations to the consultation paper "Streamlining the Cities: Housing", some 90 concerned Greater London council provision for the single homeless.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what responses he has received from the Confederation of British Industry and the London chamber of commerce and industry to the planning proposals for London in the White Paper Cmnd. 9063 "Streamlining the Cities".
The views of the Confederation of British Industry and the London Chamber of Commerce and Industry on the planning proposals for London form part of their general response to the White Paper, and the hon. Member should approach those bodies for details of that response.
Civil Defence
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) when was the last occasion his Department requested or required any sewerage authority to fulfil its duties under Regulation 2(a)(iv) of the Civil Defence (Sewerage) Regulations 1949 in relation to planning such additional works and installations to bypass vulnerable points or to supplement existing services as may seem necessary in areas likely to be subject to hostile attack; (2) when was the last occasion his Department required any statutory water authority to fulfil its duty under Regulation 2
(a)(i) of the Civil Defence (Water Supplies) Regulations 1949 in relation to planning such control centres and stores for dispersal of stocks and such additional works for the purpose of by-passing vulnerable
points or supplementing existing supplies of water, as may seem necessary in areas likely to be subject to hostile attack.
Water authorities were asked in May 1983 to draw up civil defence plans by mid-1985, and I shall be asking them soon to report their progress.
Local Authority Expenditure
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will list those local authorities whose gross revenue expenditure has risen by (a) less than the rate of inflation as measured by the retail price index, (b) less than 10 per cent. above the rate of inflation and (c) less than 20 per cent. above the rate of inflation over the period 1978–79 to 1982–83;(2) if he will publish, for the years 1978–79 to 1982–83, the outturns of local authority gross revenue expenditure for England and Wales and the proportions of that expenditure financed by (i) domestic ratepayers, (ii) domestic relief grant, (iii) industrial ratepayers (iv) commercial ratepayers, (v) other non-domestic ratepayers, (vi) specific grants (vii) supplementary grants, (viii) needs and resources/block grant, (ix) housing subsidy, (x) rent rebate grant, (xi) rents, net of rebate grant, (xii) fees and charges, (xiii) other income and (xiv) balances.
I shall answer these questions shortly.
Rate Support Grant
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list for (i) each London borough, (ii) London in total, (iii) England excluding Greater London and (iv) those authorities in his Department's top 20 most deprived local authority areas, rate support grant as a percentage of total expenditure for the financial years 1978–79, 1979–80, 1980–81, 1981–82, 1982–83 and 1983–84.
Total expenditure information is not available in a consistent reliable form for years prior to 1981–82. In the table the figures for 1981–82 are based on outturn expenditure; those for 1982–83 and 1983–84 are based on local authorities' budgets.
| Block grant (after holdback) as a percentage of total expenditure | |||
| 1981–82 per cent. | 1982–83 per cent. | 1983–84 per cent. | |
| (i) London Boroughs: | |||
| City of London | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camden* | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Greenwich | 53·0 | 47·6 | 36·1 |
| Hackney* | 59·6 | 50·9 | 52·4 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham* | 56·9 | 52·7 | 57·6 |
| Islington* | 31·2 | 33·9 | 28·5 |
| Kensington and Chelsea* | 13·2 | 15·4 | 27·6 |
| Lambeth* | 48·2 | 47·8 | 40·5 |
| Lewisham* | 59·4 | 56·4 | 55·9 |
| Southwark* | 39·7 | 44·1 | 32·4 |
| Tower Hamlets* | 41·9 | 32·7 | 35·2 |
| Wandsworth* | 66·6 | 70·0 | 75·2 |
| Westminster | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barking and Dagenham | 41·9 | 42·0 | 43·7 |
| Barnet | 36·3 | 38·9 | 34·7 |
| Bexley | 50·9 | 51·4 | 55·6 |
| Brent* | 37·1 | 41·8 | 36·5 |
| Bromley | 47·3 | 48·8 | 46·6 |
1981–82 per cent.
| 1982–83 per cent.
| 1983–84 per cent.
| |
| Croydon | 46·7 | 45·9 | 41·6 |
| Ealing | 43·3 | 48·9 | 48·3 |
| Enfield | 41·7 | 41·7 | 44·4 |
| Haringey* | 48·7 | 46·8 | 39·3 |
| Harrow | 38·0 | 38·0 | 42·3 |
| Havering | 48·2 | 50·4 | 49·4 |
| Hillingdon | 25·8 | 24·0 | 22·9 |
| Hounslow | 24·9 | 23·6 | 24·3 |
| Kingston-upon-Thames | 37·5 | 40·0 | 36·9 |
| Merton | 45·9 | 47·5 | 45·1 |
| Newham* | 53·5 | 55·8 | 54·4 |
| Redbridge | 50·0 | 52·1 | 51·9 |
| Richmond-upon-Thames | 42·5 | 41·7 | 35·7 |
| Sutton | 46·6 | 48·0 | 45·8 |
| Waltham forest | 50·0 | 50·8 | 57·5 |
| (ii) London in total | 31·4 | 27·9 | 25·3 |
| (iii) England excluding Greater London | 48·6 | 45·4 | 44·6 |
| (iv) "the top 20 most deprived local authority areas': those London boroughs marked * in (i) above and | |||
| Birmingham | 47·9 | 44·5 | 48·7 |
| Coventry | 53·2 | 50·9 | 49·6 |
| Leicester | 56·0 | 37·1 | 33·0 |
| Liverpool | 56·2 | 51·8 | 54·0 |
| Manchester | 47·0 | 42·8 | 39·5 |
| Sandwell | 35·6 | 40·0 | 44·6 |
| Wolverhampton | 42·3 | 45·5 | 45·4 |
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will give the amount of rate support grant paid per head of population in (i) each London borough, (ii) London as a whole, (iii) England excluding Greater London and (iv) England in the latest year for which information is available.
The information requested by the hon. Member is as follows. The figures are the amount of block grant per head in 1984–85, on the basis of local authorities' budgets for the year, before the implementation of any grant abatement.
| £ | |
| (i) City of London | 0 |
| Camden | 0 |
| Greenwich | 148 |
| Hackney | 238 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 208 |
| Islington | 113 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 52 |
| Lambeth | 188 |
| Lewisham | 184 |
| Southwark | 156 |
| Tower Hamlets | 139 |
| Wandsworth | 175 |
| Westminster | 0 |
| Barking and Dagenham | 168 |
| Barnet | 105 |
| Bexley | 203 |
| Brent | 238 |
| Bromley | 139 |
| Croydon | 129 |
| Ealing | 190 |
| Enfield | 157 |
| Haringey | 291 |
| Harrow | 151 |
| Havering | 171 |
| Hillingdon | 78 |
| Hounslow | 108 |
£
| |
| Kingston upon Thames | 118 |
| Merton | 157 |
| Newham | 344 |
| Redbridge | 165 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 108 |
| Sutton | 147 |
| Waltham Forest | 286 |
| (ii) London as a whole | 161 |
| (iii) England excluding Greater London | 185 |
| (iv) England | 181 |
Seaside And Country Homes Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has reached a conclusion as to which body or bodies will run the seaside and country homes scheme, and the London wide mobility scheme, and take decisions over the joint funding of voluntary housing groups if the Greater London council is abolished.
Our proposals for the operation of the mobility and seaside and country homes schemes after the abolition of the GLC will be put to the authorities concerned in due course. It will be for the London boroughs collectively to decide on the funding of voluntary bodies eligible for consideration under the arrangements announced by my right hon. Friend on 11 April at columns 406–7.
Environmental Protection
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he is satisfied with his Department's record of achievement on environmental protection.
Yes. The United Kingdom has for many years adopted a progressive and effective approach to environmental problems. My Department has therefore published today a booklet which seeks to describe what has been achieved in the past, and outlines our approach to current environmental issues. Copies are available in the Library of the House.
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Milk Consumption
8.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food which member state of the European Community has the lowest consumption of liquid milk.
On the basis of statistics relating to 1981, which is the latest year for which figures are available for all member states of the EC, Greece has the lowest per capita consumption in the Community.
Pig And Poultry Producers (Feed Prices)
15.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what effect the recent agreement on agriculture support prices and other matters will have on feed prices to the pig and poultry producers.
The price of feed is, of course, affected by a wide range of factors. But, as one of these, the agreement reached by the Council of Ministers on 30 and 31 March is likely in itself to have a small downward effect on grain prices. In addition, Ministers agreed that subsidy should be payable on concentrated skimmed milk fed to pigs on terms similar to those affecting liquid skimmed milk at present. The Commission is expected to come forward shortly with detailed rules for the implementation of this scheme.
Cereals
16.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is the policy of Her Majesty's Government towards proposals to reduce support prices for cereals.
The Government pressed for a price reduction for cereals at this year's agricultural price negotiations in Brussels, and obtained agreement to a cut of 1 per cent. for most feed grains, and more in the case of breadmaking wheat. Further stringent restraint on support levels will be needed if expenditure on the cereals regime is to be controlled and the right balance restored between the arable and livestock sectors.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will estimate the quantity of each United Kingdom grown cereal exported to third countries from the United Kingdom in 1983, together with the relevant cost to guarantee funds; and if he will tabulate, in respect of wheat, each recipient country importing more than 10 per cent. of the total together with the relevant proportion of the total export subsidy.
Exports to third countries amounted to 752,000 tonnes of wheat and 1,383,000 tonnes of barley at a cost in export refunds and monetary compensatory amounts of £48 million and £89 million respectively. Those countries receiving more than 10 per cent. of the total quantity for wheat were as follows. A breakdown of expenditure on export refunds by country of destination is not readly available.
1983 United Kingdom wheat exports to third countries
| |
Country of Destination
| Tonnage
|
| Poland | 140,000 |
| Egypt | 116,000 |
| Algeria | 107,000 |
| GDR | 101,000 |
| Tunisia | 85,000 |
Common Agriculture Budget
17.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he is yet able to say what effect the agricultural agreement will have on the common agriculture budget for 1984–85.
The provision in the 1984 Community budget for expenditure on the common agricultural policy has not been changed as a result of the prices settlement. The settlement itself is expected to reduce expenditure below the level which would otherwise have obtained, although market developments are tending to have the opposite effect.
Dairy Farmers
18.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he now expects to announce details of an outgoers scheme for United Kingdom milk producers.
20.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether he will now outline any help which he proposes to give by way of national aids to milk producers following the recent agricultural price settlement.
26.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he has any plans to pay compensation to dairy farmers for loss of business; and if he will make a statement.
I refer my hon. Friends and the hon. Gentleman to my reply on 25 May, at column 559, to my hon. Friend the Member for Dorset, North (Mr. Baker).
22.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he intends to reply to the recent letter from the hon. Member for Christchurch about dairy farmers.
My hon. Friend should by now have received a reply to his recent letter. I regret that it was not possible to reply more quickly.
23.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he is now satisfied with the prospects for the smaller dairy farmer.
I refer my hon. Friend to the arrangements I announced on 25 May, at column 559, in reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Dorset, North (Mr. Baker).
24.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how much the United Kingdom's share of total European Economic Community milk production will decline as a result of the regulations imposing production quotas; and if he will make a statement.
The production quotas agreed for milk give milk producers a guaranteed quantity to which Community price support arrangements apply. Although production beyond that limit will be levied it will not be prohibited. It is thus not possible to say how levels of United Kingdom production will compare with total levels of European Community production.
27.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what arrangements he is making about the transferability of milk production quotas.
Discussions are taking place with the various interests concerned to see what arrangements would be appropriate to our circumstances.
30.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether he is now in a position to announce details regarding the ownership, sale and transferability of milk production quotas.
We are considering with the interests concerned what provision would be suitable in our circumstances.
34.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether, in laying down criteria for assessing appeals over milk quota allocations, he will give special consideration to those areas of the country for which 1983 was a poor year for milk production.
The criteria for producers who wish to be considered as special cases are set out in Council regulation (EEC) No. 857/84 and Commission regulation (EEC) No. 1391/84. Special consideration to those for which 1983 was a poor year for milk production can be given only if they meet the criteria laid down.
38.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations he has received on allocation of quotas to the moderately-sized dairy producer who has not expanded in the last few years.
A number of representations have been received suggesting that dairy farmers who have not expanded their production since 1981 should receive an allocation effectively reflecting their 1981 production level.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is his estimate of the capital value of the average small dairy farm, as defined for the purposes of table 27 of the latest annual review White Paper, Cmnd. 9137, for sale as a going concern before the quotas were introduced.
Balance sheets for samples of farms are obtained as part of farm management surveys. The average valuations shown by the survey in England and Wales of total farm business assets, including owner occupied land valued at conservative market prices, on small dairy farms as defined in table 27 of the White Paper on the "Annual Review of Agriculture 1984" (Cmnd. 9137), at an average valuation date in February 1983 were approximately £59,500, £141,000 and £119,000 per farm for tenanted, owner-occupied and mixed tenure farms respectively and £114,000 for all tenure types taken together. The corresponding figure for all tenure types taken together in Great Britain is £115,500.
Agricultural Surpluses
19.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether there has been any increase in the quantities of agricultural products in surplus within the European Economic Community since the answer to the hon. Member for Dumfries (Sir H. Monro) on 3 May, Official Report, column 192.
In terms of days' supply, stocks of butter have risen, but stocks for all other products, except beef, have fallen.The revised figures are as follows:
| Days' Supply | |||
| Commodity | Date | Public Storage | Assisted Private Storage |
| Butter | 17 May 1984 | 227 | 0 |
| Skimmed Milk Powder | 17 May 1984 | 170 | 0 |
| Wheat | 10 May 1984 | 34 | 0 |
| Barley | 10 May 1984 | 2 | 0 |
| Rye | 10 May 1984 | 28 | 0 |
| Beef | 30 April 1984 | 18 | 1 |
| Wine | 31 March 1984 | 0 | 113 |
Coal Mining Subsidence
21.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food which organisations he will be consulting about the implications for agriculture contained in the Waddilove report on coal mining subsidence.
Compensation for mining subsidence damage is a matter for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Energy, who will shortly be consulting interested parties on the recommendations of the Waddilove committee. My Ministry will be involved in these consultations.
Straw And Stubble Burning
25.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on progress towards developing procedures to be followed by farmers who burn straw stubble during the coming year.
My right hon. Friend announced on 20 March the issue of revised model byelaws for straw and stubble burning. I understand from the Home Office that the uptake of these model byelaws by the local authorities in England and Wales has been encouraging. The National Farmers Union has revised its code of practice on straw and stubble burning to comply with these new byelaws and this will be published shortly and distributed to all cereal growers. The Agricultural Training Board has just announced its new training video to help farmers and their employees to carry out straw burning safely. These organisations and this Ministry will be taking every opportunity both before and during the coming harvest to bring the details of the byelaws and the NFU code to the attention of the farming community.
Lobsters
28.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations he has received since 1 January from lobster fishermen seeking the introduction of a licensing system in their industry.
Following representations from a number of organisations in the industry, both since 1 January and previously, my noble Friend the Minister of State, Scottish Office and I met representatives of the National Federation of Fishermen's Organisations and the Scottish Fishermen's Federation on 23 February to discuss the question of licensing in the lobster fishing industry. Subsequently those organisations were advised by letter that we had decided not to introduce a general national licensing scheme.Since then I have received no further representations on the matter.
Monetary Compensatory Amounts
29.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what has been the maximum and minimum percentage monetary compensatory amounts payable in agricultural trade between the United Kingdom and other member states of the community since 1980.
The maximum and minimum monetary compensatory amount percentage applied to United Kingdom trade with other member states since 1980 has been +18·2 in February 1981 and —3·5 in January 1980 respectively.
Pesticides
31.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on progress towards new arrangements for evaluating and clearing for safety imported pesticides.
The Government are hoping to introduce legislation during the next Session of Parliament to ensure the safe and efficient use of all pesticides, whether imported or home-produced.
Balance Of Trade
32.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what has been the improvement in £ sterling in the balance of trade in agricultural and food products since 1979.
I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given to my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Mid-Bedfordshire (Mr. Lyell) on 3 May.
Agricultural Development Advisory Service
33.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether he has any plans to modify the training given to members of the staff of the Agricultural Development Advisory Service to assist them in helping farmers to plan their production.
Staff of the Agricultural Development and Advisory Service will continue to be trained to meet the changing needs of the industry.
Prawn Fishery
35.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what steps he proposes to take to protect the prawn fishery on the accession of Spain and Portugal to the European Economic Community.
Fisheries aspects of the negotiations for Spain and Portugal's accession to the Community are still at a very early stage.
We are seeking to ensure that the arrangements for Spanish and Portuguese accession will include adequate safeguards for the existing fishing opportunities of United Kingdom fishermen, including the prawn fishery.
Fishing Industry
36.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what proposals he has to give special help to the Grimsby fishing industry to ensure the survival of a vigorous fishing industry in that port.
Various measures, including grants for vessel construction and modernisation, already exist to help the fishing industry at Grimsby and other ports. In addition, our recent announcement of sectoral quotas demonstrates our willingness to adapt the arrangements for management of North sea white fish quotas to meet the needs of fishermen at Grimsby and elsewhere. Above all, the stability provided by the common fisheries policy will enable vessel owners to plan ahead with renewed much greater confidence in the future of the industry.
Wildlife And Countryside Act
37.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he is satisfied with the response of the agriculture industry to the workings of the Wildlife and Countryside Act.
The countryside today owes its distinctive character to farming practices as they have developed over the years. In accordance with the voluntary approach of the Wildlife and Countryside Act, the agriculture industry continues to make a major contribution to countryside conservation and this is being reinforced by the advisory efforts of my Ministry.
Departmental Staff
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many of the employees in his Department are the holders of degrees or diplomas which were awarded by the Open University.
Our records show that 33 officers hold Open University degrees or diplomas.
Milk
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what has been the total value of milk produced by the United Kingdom dairy farmers in each of the last 10 years.
The following table shows the value at the farmgate of United Kingdom output of milk and milk products for human consumption.
| Calendar year | £ million |
| 1974 | 837 |
| 1975 | 1,064 |
| 1976 | 1,292 |
| 1977 | 1,484 |
| 1978 | 1,620 |
| 1979 | 1,764 |
| 1980 | 1,960 |
| 1981 | 2,100 |
| 1982 | 2,383 |
| 1983 | *2,486 |
Source: "Annual Review of Agriculture White Papers 19790–84 Output, Input and Income Table".
* Forecast.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what has been the average yield per dairy cow of milk in each of the countries in the EEC in each of the last five years.
Figures showing the average yield per cow in each member state of the EEC are set out in table 23 of "EEC Dairy Facts and Figures 1983". Information for 1983 is not yet available.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what has been the total utilisation of United Kingdom produced milk in each of the last 10 years in (a) butter production, (b) cheese production, (c) dried milk production, (d) liquid consumption, (e) cream production, (f) condensed milk production, (g) confectionery production and (h) other uses.
Figures showing the utiisation of United Kingdom produced milk are set out in tables 68 and 86 of "United Kingdom Dairy Facts and Figures 1983" published by the Federation of United Kingdom Milk Marketing Boards and available in the Library of the House. Separate information in respect of confectionery production is not available.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) what has been the average price per litre of milk produced paid to farmers in each of the last 15 years at current value rates;(2) what has been the average price per litre of milk produced paid to farmers in each of the last 15 years.
The information on average prices paid to farmers requested by my hon. Friend is set out in the following table. This shows the annual average net price received for milk by wholesale producers in the United Kingdom in each of the last 15 years at both actual and current values.
| (a) Net price received for milk by wholesale producers in the United Kingdom with (b) prices in 1982–83 current value terms using the RPI as deflator | ||
| (pence per litre) | ||
| April/March | (a) | (b) |
| 1968–69 | 3·553 | 17·415 |
| 1969–70 | 3·528 | 16·447 |
| Dairy cow numbers at *December ('000 head) | |||||||
| Country | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 |
| Germany | 5,388 | 5,417 | 5,442 | 5,443 | 5,469 | 5,438 | 5,532 |
| France | 7,627 | 7,512 | 7,491 | 7,452 | 7,120 | 7,054 | 7,202 |
| Italy | 2,897 | 2,945 | 3,010 | 3,074 | 3,013 | 3,016 | 3,044 |
| Netherlands | 2,197 | 2,212 | 2,308 | 2,343 | 2,356 | 2,407 | 2,482 |
| Belgium | 986 | 974 | 981 | 978 | 977 | 965 | 964 |
| Luxembourg | 66 | 68 | 68 | 67 | 69 | 68 | 71 |
| United Kingdom | 3,318 | 3,327 | 3,392 | 3,333 | 3,277 | 3,293 | 3,345 |
| Irish Republic | 1,436 | 1,484 | 1,513 | 1,503 | 1,449 | 1,458 | 1,513 |
| Denmark | 1,102 | 1,087 | 1,100 | 1,056 | 1,066 | 1,020 | 1,014 |
| Greece | n/a | 475 | 419 | 385 | 242 | 242 | 221 |
| Total Ten† | ‡25,017 | 25,501 | 25,724 | 25,634 | 25,038 | 24,962 | 25,386 |
April/March
| (a)
| (b)
|
| 1970–71 | 3·819 | 16·619 |
| 1971–72 | 4·213 | 16·771 |
| 1972–73 | 4·362 | 16·209 |
| 1973–74 | 5·082 | 17·107 |
| 1974–75 | 6·233 | 17·790 |
| 1975–76 | 7·804 | 17·863 |
| 1976–77 | 9·263 | 18·405 |
| 1977–78 | 9·820 | 17·107 |
| 1978–79 | 10·429 | 16·776 |
| 1979–80 | 11·436 | 15·884 |
| 1980–81 | 12·533 | 14·965 |
| 1981–82 | 13·623 | 14·592 |
| 1982–83 | 14·641 | 14·641 |
Sources:
(a) "United Kingdom Dairy Facts and Figures" published annually by the Federation of Milk Marketing Boards;
(b) Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what has been the total milk production of each of the member countries of the EEC in each of the last five years for which figures are available; and by how much this production has exceeded the domestic demand in each country in those years.
Total cows' milk production for each member state of the EC for the five years 1978 to 1982 are given in table 25 of the 1983 edition of "EEC Dairy Facts and Figures" which is published by the Milk Marketing Board and is available in the Library of the House. Because milk is consumed as a range of products in which the butterfat and solids-not-fat proportions are different from those in whole milk, it is not meaningful to to produce a single figure for each country of milk consumption compare with these production figures. However, estimates of self-sufficiency on the basis of butterfat production and requirements, and solid-not-fat production and requiremens are given in table 39 of the 1983 edition of "EEC Dairy Facts and Figures".
Dairy Herds
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what has been the total size of the dairy herd in each of the countries in the EEC in each of the last seven years.
The information requested is set out in the following table. Similar information for 1983 is not yet available.
* December data is the usual basis for international comparisons of this kind.
†Due to roundings items do not always add to totals.
‡EC Nine.
Source: "EEC Dairy Facts and Figures" 1981, 1982 and 1983—table 16.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what has been the total size of the dairy herd in each of the last 20 years in (a) Scotland, (b) England, (c) Wales and (d) Northern Ireland.
The information requested is set out in the following table:
| Dairy herd population at June ('000 head) | ||||
| Year | England | Wales | Scotland | Northern Ireland |
| 1962 | 2,362 | 365 | 361 | 201 |
| 1963 | 2,338 | 359 | 356 | 194 |
| 1964 | 2,257 | 349 | 343 | 198 |
| 1965 | 2,298 | 352 | 340 | 197 |
| 1966 | 2,283 | 348 | 332 | 199 |
| 1967 | 2,329 | 357 | 329 | 200 |
| 1968 | 2,335 | 360 | 329 | 201 |
| 1969 | 2,379 | 363 | 328 | 204 |
| 1970 | 2,357 | 357 | 321 | 208 |
| 1971 | 2,352 | 356 | 310 | 215 |
| 1972 | 2,424 | 363 | 312 | 225 |
| 1973 | 2,510 | 372 | 319 | 235 |
| 1974 | 2,480 | 359 | 315 | 241 |
| 1975 | 2,357 | 344 | 302 | 239 |
| 1976 | 2,344 | 345 | 298 | 242 |
| 1977 | 2,368 | 351 | 296 | 250 |
| Milk yield per cow by herd size 1968–69 to 1982–83—England and Wales | ||||||||
| April—March Years | ||||||||
| Litres/Cow | ||||||||
| Herd Size Cow herd | 1968–69 | 1972–73 | 1976–77 | 1977–78 | 1978–79 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 |
| 10–19 | 3,360 | 3,651 | 3,570 | 3,697 | 3,820 | 3,997 | 4,000 | 4,221 |
| 20–29 | 3,801 | 3,828 | 3,892 | 4,147 | 4,095 | |||
| 30–39 | 3,769 | 4,023 | 4,072 | 4,297 | 4,348 | 4,522 | 4,227 | 4,525 |
| 40–49 | 3,787 | 4,019 | 4,177 | 4,515 | 4,514 | 4,926 | 4,934 | 4,993 |
| 50–59 | 3,819 | 4,151 | 4,244 | 4,495 | 4,506 | 4,965 | 4,877 | 5,009 |
| 60–69 | 3,996 | 4,123 | 4,405 | 4,754 | 5,052 | 5,000 | 4,832 | 5,258 |
| 70–99 | 4,087 | 4,342 | 4,582 | 4,950 | 5,095 | 5,241 | 5,116 | 5,420 |
| 100–199 | 3,696 | 4,560 | 4,786 | 5,043 | 5,123 | 5,500 | 5,454 | 5,714 |
| 200+ | 4,114 | 4,800 | 5,028 | 5,100 | 5,511 | 5,447 | 5,730 | |
| All herds | 3,769 | 4,119 | 4,396 | 4,701 | 4,819 | 5,107 | 5,034 | 5,321 |
Sources:
National Investigations into The Economics of Milk Production in England and Wales:—
Report on Costs and Efficiency in Milk Production 1976–77—Her Majesty's Stationary Office
Milk Production 1980–81—Her Majesty's Stationary Office
Milk Production 1981–82—Supplementary Information to the 1980–81 Milk Costs Survey—Milk Marketing Board
Milk Production 1982–83—Supplementary Information to the 1980–81 Milk Costs Survey—Milk Marketing Board
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what has been the average milk yield per dairy cow in each of the last 10 years in (a) England, (b) Wales, (c) Scotland and (d) Northern Ireland.
Average annual milk yields per dairy cow in each of the five milk marketing board areas are set out in table 18 of "United Kingdom Dairy Facts and Figures 1983" published by the Federation of United Kingdom Milk Marketing Boards and available in the Library of the House. This table provides information up to 1982–83. Similar information for 1983–84 is not yet available. Figures for England and Wales separately are not available.
Year
| England
| Wales
| Scotland
| Northern Ireland
|
| 1978 | 2,367 | 354 | 297 | 257 |
| 1979 | 2,379 | 359 | 290 | 265 |
| 1980 | 2,324 | 352 | 282 | 270 |
| 1981 | 2,286 | 356 | 278 | 270 |
| 1982 | 2,323 | 365 | 282 | 280 |
| 1983 | 2,373 | 377 | 289 | 294 |
Note: Figures are for statistically significant holdings only, except for (i) England and Wales for 1978 onwards and (ii) Northern Ireland before 1973.
Source: June agricultural census. This is a full census, whilst December herd data are based on a sample census.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what has been the average milk yield per dairy cow in each of the last 10 years of cows in herds of (a) under 30 cows, (b) 30 to 49 cows, (c) 50 to 69 cows, (d) 70 to 99 cows and (e) 100 cows and over in the United Kingdom.
Information is not available in the precise form requested by my hon. Friend. However, the following table sets out the average milk yield per cow by herd size recorded by sample surveys sponsored by my Department.
Dairy Farms
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the increase in net farm income per dairy farm between 1979–80 and 1982–83 in real terms; and what effect this has had on the production of milk.
Information on the change in net farm income per dairy farm in real terms between 1979–80 and 1982–83 is given in table 26 of the "Annual Review of Agriculture 1984" White Paper (Cmnd. 9137). Production of milk is affected not only by the level of farm income but by various other factors, notably the weather. Figures for total sales of milk off farms in the United Kingdom are given in table 49 of "Dairy Facts and Figures 1983" published by the Federation of United Kingdom Milk Marketing Boards and available in the Library of the House.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether he will publish in the Official Report a table showing for the years ended February 1981 and February 1982 the same information for dairy farms as is given in table 27 of the annual review White Paper for 1984, Cmnd. 9137, or such information as is available by reference to the size of operation; and
| Farm Accounts: net farm income for Dairy farms. 1979–80 to 1982–83 (years ending February) | ||||||||||||
| Size of business | ||||||||||||
| Small | Medium | Large | ||||||||||
| 4–7·9 ESU | 8–15·9 ESU | 4–15·9 ESU | 16–39·9 ESU | 40 ESU and over | ||||||||
| Country/Year | Total Area (hectares) | £ per farm | Annual labour units | Total Area (hectares) | £ per farm | Annual labour units | Total Area (hectares) | £ per farm | Total Area (hectares) | £ per farm | Total Area (hectares) | £ per farm |
| England | ||||||||||||
| 1979–80 | 25 | 2,051 | 1·16 | 38 | 4,816 | 1·54 | 34 | 4,103 | 71 | 7,745 | 181 | 17,488 |
| 1980–81 | 26 | 3,104 | 1·12 | 38 | 5,565 | 1·53 | 35 | 4,930 | 72 | 8,959 | 185 | 19,014 |
| 1980–81 | 25 | 2,832 | 1·23 | 38 | 5,006 | 1·59 | 35 | 4,436 | 72 | 9,345 | 176 | 17,518 |
| 1981–82 | 26 | 3,533 | 1·25 | 38 | 6,411 | 1·64 | 35 | 5,656 | 72 | 12,093 | 178 | 22,518 |
| 1981–82 | 30 | 3,389 | 1·19 | 39 | 6,368 | 1·67 | 37 | 5,599 | 71 | 11,734 | 172 | 22,472 |
| 1982–83 | 30 | 4,300 | 1·15 | 39 | 7,631 | 1·70 | 37 | 6,771 | 71 | 13,734 | 174 | 29,891 |
| Wales | ||||||||||||
| 1979–80 | 23 | 1,463 | 1·35 | 37 | 4,561 | 1·66 | 32 | 3,490 | 67 | 9,292 | 151 | 18,859 |
| 1980–81 | 23 | 1,737 | 1·30 | 37 | 4,399 | 1·64 | 32 | 3,479 | 68 | 10,279 | 156 | 20,062 |
| 1980–81 | 25 | 2,407 | 1·35 | 37 | 3,776 | 1·80 | 33 | 3,298 | 72 | 10,723 | 149 | 21,823 |
| 1981–82 | 25 | 2,443 | 1·37 | 38 | 6,172 | 1·76 | 33 | 4,869 | 73 | 12,853 | 149 | 27,263 |
| 1981–82 | 25 | 2,565 | 1·51 | 38 | 6,595 | 1·71 | 33 | 5,237 | 73 | 12,831 | 144 | 25,047 |
| 1982–83 | 26 | 2,125 | 1·50 | 40 | 8,683 | 1·72 | 35 | 6,474 | 74 | 14,928 | 145 | 30,975 |
| Scotland | ||||||||||||
| 1979–80 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 73 | 2,265 | 155 | 6,275 |
| 1980–81 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 73 | 4,827 | 156 | 8,368 |
| 1980–81 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 75 | 5,082 | 158 | 7,753 |
| 1981–82 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 76 | 9,095 | 158 | 21,801 |
| 1981–82 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 77 | 7,797 | 147 | 21,922 |
| 1982–83 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 78 | 10,920 | 151 | 23,109 |
| Northern Ireland | ||||||||||||
| 1979–80 | 30 | 424 | 1·46 | 39 | 2,392 | 1·63 | 35 | 1,210 | 62 | 8,067 | n.a. | n.a. |
| 1980–81 | 30 | 458 | 1·35 | 40 | 2,999 | 1·55 | 35 | 1,743 | 64 | 9,710 | n.a. | n.a. |
| 1980–81 | 26 | 242 | 1·20 | 39 | 3,877 | 1·51 | 33 | 2,005 | 66 | 9,483 | n.a. | n.a. |
| 1981–82 | 27 | 3,038 | 1·16 | 40 | 7,593 | 1·48 | 34 | 5,393 | 68 | 16,594 | n.a. | n.a. |
| 1981–82 | 28 | 3,061 | n.a. | 41 | 7,194 | n.a. | 35 | 3,827 | 65 | 14,897 | n.a. | n.a. |
| 1982–83 | 28 | 3,857 | n.a. | 41 | 10,889 | n.a. | 35 | 7,598 | 67 | 20,396 | n.a. | n.a. |
Notes:
1. The figures are derived from identical samples of farms for pairs of years, each farm being classified by type of farming and size of business according to its stocking and cropping in the second year of each pair.
2. For size of business definitions see note (b) to table 27 of the White Paper "Annual Review of Agriculture" (Cmnd. 9137).
3. Annual labour units (ALU). These are the estimated number of full time worker equivalents of persons working on the holding during the year. One ALU represents the activity of a person working normal full-time hours throughout the year. Part time workers are converted to full-time equivalents in proportion to their actual working time relative to that of a full-time worker.
4. Total area includes rough grazing.
5. n.a. —Figures not available.
Source: Farm Management Surveys.
if he will give a further breakdown of the figure for small farms to distinguish those which were almost entirely one-man units in each of the three years.
Information on dairy farms, on the same basis as in table 27 of the "Annual Review of Agriculture" White Paper Cmnd. 9137 is as follows for the years ending February 1981, February 1982 and February 1983. Data are also shown separately for the two size groups which comprise the small farms category. It is not possible to distinguish those holdings which were one man units in each of the three years, but average annual labour units are shown in each case.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether he will publish in the Official Report the estimated return on capital employed in dairy farming for each of the categories specified in table 27 of the latest annual review White Paper, Cmnd. 9137.
The estimated return on capital in 1982–83 derived by expressing management and investment income as a percentage of average tenants capital is as follows for the categories of dairy farm specified in table 27 of the "Annual Review of Agriculture" White Paper, Cmnd. 9137.
| Estimated return on capital on dairy farms 1982–83 (year ending February 1983) | |||
| Size of business | |||
| Country | Small per cent. | Medium per cent. | Large per cent. |
| England | 6 | 12 | 14½ |
| Wales | 6 | 14½ | 18 |
| Scotland | * | 8½ | 14 |
| Northern Ireland | * | * | * |
| * Figures not available. | |||
Notes:
1. Return on capital is defined as management and investment income as a proportion of average tenants capital, using data from the 1982–83 farm management survey. M and II is here defined provisionally as the value of total farm output including breeding livestock stock appreciation minus all inputs except salaries of paid management and interest on farming loans but including the manual labour input of farmers and their spouses.
2. See notes to tables 26 and 27 of annual review White Paper (Cmnd. 9137) for definition of business sizes.
Calf Prices
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what estimate he has made of the impact on calf prices of the European Economic Community agreement on milk production.
It is not my Department's practice to publish estimates of future market prices. Calf prices have, however, strengthed noticeably in recent weeks.
Uss Sam Rayburn (Collision)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on the collision between the USS Sam Rayburn and dumped nuclear waste barrels off the south-west coast of England; and what action has been taken as a result.
I have found no factual basis for the story that appeared in the Daily Express on 16 April of a collision off the south-west coast of England between the USS Sam Rayburn and dumped nuclear waste.
Gatt
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is the policy of Her Majesty's Government towards the proposals of the general agreement on tariffs and trade to bring trade in agricultural products within its rules.
The United Kingdom subscribed to the declaration by the contracting parties to the general agreement, in November 1982, which called for a two-year work programme designed to bring agriculture more fully within the multilateral trading system by improving the effectiveness of the rules, provisions and disciplines of the general agreement and through their common interpretation. The Government hope for a successful outcome of the current discussions on this issue.
Scotch Whisky
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many representations he has received to the latest available date about regulations on the minimum alcoholic strength of Scotch whisky.
We have received many representations on our minimum alcoholic strength proposals for Scotch whisky; some have been in favour and other against.
Employment
Manufacturing Industry (Wages)
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how much of the 10 per cent. increase in earnings of manual workers in manufacturing industry in the year to Q4 1983 is attributable to (a) longer hours worked, (b) a reduction in the basic working week, (c) increased hourly rates and (d) other factors.
The available information on the factors underlying the increase in average weekly earnings of manual workers in manufacturing industry is as follows.The survey of manual workers' earnings and hours in October 1983 showed, for full-time male employees on adult rates, the following:
| Percentage increase on a year earlier | |
| Per cent. | |
| Average weekly earnings | 9·75 |
| Average hourly earnings | 8·00 |
Labour Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what proportion of the long-term unemployed (a) in the west midlands and (b) nationally have been out of work for two years and over.
On 5 April 1984, the latest date for which an analysis by duration of unemployment is available, of the numbers of unemployed claimants in the west midlands region and the United Kingdom who had been unemployed for over 52 weeks, 57·2 per cent. and 53·8 per cent., respectively, had been unemployed for over 104 weeks.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what proportion of unemployed people in the west midlands are long-term unemployed; and how the figures compare with the proportions nationally and in the assisted areas.
On 5 April 1984, the latest date for which an analysis by duration of unemployment is available, of the total number of unemployed claimants in the west midlands region, 46·3 per cent. had been unemployed for over 52 weeks. The corresponding proportions for the United Kingdom and the assisted areas were 39·2 per cent. and 41·9 per cent., respectively.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list the figures for the number of unemployed in the Houghton and Washington constituency, and the Houghton and Washington jobcentres, by age, sex, and duration of unemployment for 1 January 1984 and 1 January 1979.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people with disabilities were registered as unemployed in January 1983 and in January 1984 in the Greater London area, both in total and by borough.
On 4 March 1983 there were 20,431 disabled people who were unemployed and registered for employment at jobcentres and careers offices in the Manpower Services Commission's London region, and on 2 March 1984 the comparable figure was 8,193.I regret that information is not available broken down by London borough.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people with disabilities were placed in employment by disablement resettlement officers in the Greater London area in the 12 months to December 1982 and in the 12 months to December 1983.
In the 12 months to December 1982, 4,033 disabled people were placed into employment by disablement resettlement officers in jobcentres in the Manpower Services Commission's London region. In the 12 months to December 1983, these officers placed 3,120 disabled people into employment. In addition, a significant number of disabled people will have found jobs with the help of non-specialist employment service staff, in particular through the use of self-service vacancy displays in jobcentres.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many women with disabilities are seeking employment in the Greater London area; and what is the proportion of these who are registered as unemployed.
The information sought is not available as statistics of disabled people seeking employment do not show men and women separately.
Working Hours
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if there is any correlation between reduction in the length of the basic working week in all industries and changes in the total number of hours worked.
Many factors affect the actual number of hours worked each week on average by each worker. They include changes in technology, in productivity, and in the economy, as well as changes in the length of the basic work. It is difficult to disentangle the effects of these different factors, but it is clear that if the length of the basic week is reduced in a way which increases unit labour costs, our competitiveness, and thus job prospects, will be put at risk.
Benefits
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people ceased claiming unemployment benefit in the last month for which figures are available.
In the five-week period to 10 May 1984 a total of 411,212 unemployed people ceased to claim benefit in the United Kingdom.
Youth Training Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) how many people are employed on mode B1 and mode A youth training scheme schemes in the Houghton and Washington constituency and the Sunderland borough, by boys and girls and by age group;(2) how many places were allocated by the Manpower Services Commission to the borough of Sunderland for the youth training scheme for mode A and mode B1; and how many places were taken up.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will provide a list of mode B1 youth training scheme schemes closed down, being closed down or being reduced in size in the Greater London area.
Information is available centrally on the following mode B1 schemes in Greater London for which closure or reduction during 1984–85 is currently planned:
Planned Closures
- Age Concern (Bexley)
- Brixton Youth Families Housing Association
- NACRO Lewisham
- London Union of Youth Clubs
- Southwark Training Workshop
- Enfield Horticultural YTS
- Stanwork Project
- Tottenham Green Training Workshop
- Dr. Barnados Training Workshop (Brent)
- Kensington Action Force
- Oldfield Training Workshop
- Rotamobility
Planned Reductions
- Springboard Thamesmead
- NACRO Bexley
- NACRO Croydon
- YMCA Croydon
- NACRO Greenwich
- NACRO Lambeth
- Lambeth Ross Training Workshop
- Cranston Training Workshop
- Springboard Southwark
- Workbase (Enfield)
- Haringey Training Project
- Barnet Community Project
- NACRO Brent
- Brent Voluntary Services Council
- Paddington Churches Housing Association
- Camden Ventures
- First Rung (Enfield)
- Willoughby Project (Finsbury Park)
- NACRO Haringey
- Roxeth District Scout Council
- Stopgap (Westminster)
- Hounslow Training Workshop
- Hounslow Community Project
- FCHO
- Ealing Community Relations Council
- Ealing Voluntary Services Council
- Sandsend Training Workshop
- Fulham Training Workshop
- Sam Morris
- Merton Training Workshop
- Putney Training Workshop
- St. Annes Training Workshop
- Tooting Training Workshop
- NACRO Wandsworth
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will provide a list of mode B1 youth training scheme schemes closed down or being closed down by the Manpower Services Commission since the inception of the scheme, according to whether their managing agent is public sector, private sector, private training provider, or voluntary organisation.
Information is available centrally on the mode B1 schemes in Great Britain listed as follows for which closure during 1984–85 is currently planned. Information on schemes closed during 1983–84 and on the type of sponsors of each scheme listed is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Scotland
- Broughty Ferry Training Workshop
- Cumbernauld and Kilsyth DC
- Strathkelvin DC
- Kilmarnock Painting Scheme
- Garnock Valley Painting Scheme
- Brassneck Workshop
- Community Help Scheme
- Central RC
- Silverburn Project
- Fibrecare Training Workshop
- Kennoway Training Workshop
Wales
- Heritage Coast at Polytechnic of Wales
- Glamorgan Heritage Coast
- Welsh Industrial Maritime Museum
Midlands
- South Normanton CPA
- Dronfield CPA
- Derbyshire CC
- St Marks Community Project
- Great Central Railway
- Holyhead Employment Project
- Shrewsbury Council of Churches
- Atcham BC
- Bridgnorth Boys Club
- Hereford and Worcester Country Park Scheme
- Muslim Trust
- Unity Scheme
- Zip Theatre
North West England
- Dunham Park Scout Camp
- WRVS
- National Elfrida Rathbone Society (Gorton Baths)
- National Elfrida Rathbone Society (Premier Road)
- St Marys Centre
- Hulme Community Opportunities
- Dovecot Resident Association
- Salford Employment Trust
- Florence Institute
- Gladstone Community Association
- Age Concern (Rochdale)
- Kirkdale YTS
- Old Swan Boys Club
- Rural Preservation Association
- St Cleophas Workshop
- SHAP
- Spirit of Merseyside
- Merseyside Training Ltd
- Age Concern (Bolton)
- YMCA (Wirral)
- Conservation and Construction
- Stepping Stones
- Rescue and Use
- Vale Royal CVS
- Northwich YTS
- Warrington and Runcorn Development Corporation Warrington Sports Council
- Bronte Neighbourhood Organisation
- Charles Street Playgroup
Northern England
- Peterlee Development Corporation
Yorkshire and Humberside
- South Yorkshire Scouts Association
- Hartfleet Care and Help
- YMCA Grimsby
- British Trust for Conservation Volunteers
- Metro Action Central
London
- Dr Barnado's (Brent)
- Enfield Horticultural YTS
- Tottenham Green Training Workshop
- Stanwork Scheme
- Age Concern (Bexley)
- Southwark Training Workshop
- London Union of Youth Clubs
- Brixton Young Families Housing Association
- NACRO (Lewisham)
- Kensington Action Force
- Oldfield Training Workshop
- Rotamobility
South East England
- White Lion YTS
- Rye Council of Voluntary Services
- St Marys PCC
- Bassingborn Village College
- Bedfordshire CC Forestry
- Age Concern (Luton)
- Cherwell Pathfinder
- GWS
- Oxford CC Forestry
South West England
- Youth Workshop Trust
Wages Councils
asked the Secretary of State for Employment whether his Department's policy on the future of statutory wages councils has now been formulated; and if he will make a statement.
The future of wages councils is still under consideration. The Government are deeply concerned about the many reports they receive that the system reduces job opportunities, especially for young people, and will be considering all available evidence and opinion on this issue before making any decisions.
Community Programme
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will make a statement on the extent to which training is being offered to participants in the Manpower Services Commission community programme scheme, with reference to (a) the amount of time participants spend in training, (b) the quality and type of training which is being offered, (c) the costs of providing such training and the source of funding of these costs, (d) regional variations in these figures and (e) variations between types of sponsor and training offered.
Detailed information about training on the community programme is one of the subjects covered by a recent survey of its participants. I am informed by the Manpower Services Commission that the results will be published in the near future, and I shall then write to the hon. Member.
Homeworking (London)
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many people are employed in the homeworking sector in Greater London; and what provisions are made to ensure that their pay and conditions do not fall below the statutory minimum provisions.
It is estimated that in 1981 there were 112,000 people in the homeworking sector in Greater London. This figure includes those working from home —using their home as a base—those working on their own account, those working in the family business and those working for an outside firm.The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 requires the supplier of homework, as far as is reasonably practicable, to ensure the health and safety of homeworkers with regard to the work, material and equipment with which he supplies them. The Act is enforced by local authorities and Health and Safety Executive inspectors.Pay and other terms and conditions of employment are, in general, matters to be agreed between employer and workers — or their representatives — without statutory intervention. However, the Wages Inspectorate carries out checks on the pay of homeworkers in the wages council trades as part of its inspection programme.
Women Workers
asked the Secretary of State for Employment how many full-time and part-time women workers are now employed in the public sector; and what the figure was in 1979.
The figures for mid-1983, the latest available and mid-1979 were published in the March 1984 and November 1980 issues, respectively, of Economic Trends, copies of which are in the Library.
"Occupational Exposure Limits 1984"
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will take steps to reduce the price of the new Health and Safety Executive guidance note EH40, "Occupational Exposure Limits 1984", and if he will make a statement.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
Social Services
Electric Breast Pumps
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will ensure that the electric breast pumps approved by the National Childbirth Trust are freely available under the National Health Service for women who need to express their breast milk for medical reasons.
The provision and choice of medical equipment for use in the National Health Service, including breast pumps for mothers who need to express their milk for medical reasons, is a matter for individual health authorities in consultation with the doctors concerned.
General Practice (Vocational Training)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether it is the Government's intention to reduce the number of places available on the vocational training scheme for general practice.
We have no plans at present to reduce the number of places.
Benefit Claimants
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member for Norfolk, North of 14 May about benefit claimants, Official Report, columns 80–82, why he is unable to gave figures for 1982 and 1983.
Regular analysis of "Family Expenditure Survey" data for these purposes are only made in alternate years. Information for 1983 is not yet available; the latest is for 1981.
Hospitals (Staffing Levels)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if there are fixed minimum ratios for staffing levels in hospitals which specify the minimum qualification levels of staff.
There are no prescribed norms for staffing levels in NHS hospitals and I see no need for them. Health authorities must determine what staffing levels are necessary in the light of local circumstances. The minimum qualification requirements will depend on the type and level of post involved.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what evidence he has that adequate staffing levels are not able to be maintained in any National Health Service hospital.
None.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what evidence his Department has of nurses having to perform work outside the duties for which they are paid, and of student nurses being given the responsibilities of trained staff because of inadequate staffing levels.
None, although detailed information about the duties performed by individual nursing staff is not available centrally. It is for individual health authorities to determine the duties performed by such staff, the appropriate staffing levels and the best mix of qualified and other nursing staff to meet service needs. An integral part of student nurses' training consists of practical work in the clinical situation and this practical work involves a degree of responsibility which increases as the students gain experience during their training. They would not be expected to perform duties which were beyond their capabilities.
Benefits (Take-Up)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list in the Official Report the detailed statistics of the claimants who claimed extra benefit as a
| Claims for Weekly Payments* | ||||||
| Toxteth | Wavertree | Liverpool City | ||||
| Awarded | No Entitlement | Awarded | No Entitlement | Awarded | No Entitlement | |
| Pensioners | 17 | 114 | 23 | 154 | 9 | 71 |
| Unemployed claimants | 1 | 79 | 2 | 31 | 1 | 12 |
| Others | Nil | 81 | 4 | 118 | 3 | 93 |
| Total | 18 | 274 | 29 | 303 | 13 | 176 |
| Claims for Single Payments | ||||||
| Toxteth | Wavertree | Liverpool City | ||||
| †Awarded | Amount £ | †Awarded | Amount £ | †Awarded | Amount £ | |
| Pensioners | 109 | 6,669 | 67 | 3,834 | 65 | 3,026 |
| Unemployed claimants | 277 | 20,397 | 151 | 16,565 | 143 | 10,663 |
| Others | 219 | 15,615 | 85 | 10,811 | 77 | 6,036 |
| TOTAL | 605 | 42,681 | 303 | 31,210 | 285 | 19,725 |
| * Either claims for increase of benefits already in payment, or new claims. | ||||||
| † Records are not kept of refusals of single payments. | ||||||
Nhs (Manpower Reductions)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many (a) doctors, (b) nurses and (c) other health service workers have either (i) been made redundant, or (ii) not been offered a job in the Health Service which would otherwise have been available, following reductions in manpower made on his instructions and required to be completed by 31 March.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
St George's Hospital
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will take steps to make good the deterioration in the fabric of the former St. George's hospital at Hyde park corner; and if he will make a statement.
A minimal level of basic maintenance is carried out on that part of the empty listed building fronting the site which is owned by the Department. More substantial restorative work will need to await the outcome of negotiations for the sale of the Department's interest in the site.
result of the 1983 Merseyside county council take-up campaign at the Toxteth, Wavertree and Steen House offices, respectively.
For the Toxteth, Wavertree and Liverpool city (Steen house) local offices the following information is available:
| Total Number of Postcards Received | ||
| Toxteth | Wavertree | Liverpool City |
| 1,456 | 915 | 922 |
Furniture Grants
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what action he is taking to review claims on his Department for grants for furniture made since 1981; and if he will make a statement.
Any applications for review which are received will be dealt with according to the relevant legislation and the case law established by decisions of the social security commissioners, and in line with guidance on single payments for furniture and household equipment issued to local offices by the Chief Adjudication Officer. The most recent guidance, reflecting the recent decision by the Social Security Commissioners on regulation 10(1)(b) of the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Regulations 1981, is contained in circular S19/84, a copy of which is in the Library.
Social Security Regulations
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what has been the cost of re-examining claims on his Department arising from the ruling of social security commissioners that changes in social security regulations in 1981 had been ultra vires.
I assume the hon. Member is referring to the social security commissioners' ruling on the Supplementary Benefit (Single Payments) Regulations. Information is not held centrally about the number of claims which have been reviewed, and this could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Health Authorities (Merger)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what communications he has received from the North-West Thames regional health authority about a possible merger between the Victoria and Hammersmith and Fulham health authorities.
The chairman of the North-West Thames regional health authority, Dame Betty Paterson, wrote to my right hon. Friend on 1 June recommending that Victoria and Hammersmith and Fulham health authorities be amalgamated. We will of course consider all aspects of the case carefully before making a final decision.
Elderly Persons
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will estimate the numbers of additional elderly people likely to require care under the National Health Service in each of the next 10 years; what plans he has to meet their needs; and if he will make a statement.
The numbers of people age 65 and over are projected to grow as follows over the next 10 years and these projected increases can be expected to influence the numbers likely to require health care:
| People age 65 and over (percentage increase projected over previous year) | |
| Numbers | |
| 1985 | 1·9 |
| 1986 | 1·5 |
| 1987 | 1·0 |
| 1988 | 0·6 |
| 1989 | 0·4 |
| 1990 | 0·3 |
| 1991 | 0·4 |
| 1992 | 0·0 |
| 1993 | -0·1 |
| 1994 | -0·1 |
Patients (Travel Costs)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will extend his review of the scheme applying to travelling expenses for patients attending a hospital or clinic to cover visits to a general practitioner's surgery.
I shall let my hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.
Occupational Pensions
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now review the operation of section 5 of the Social Security (No. 2) Act 1980 so that those who are aged over 60 years and receive unemployment benefit are not penalised by having an occupational pension.
No. The provision affects only those with occupational pensions of substantial value. We are keeping in mind the arguments for raising the level, currently £35, at which such pensions start to affect benefit, but this has to be considered in comparison with other demands on resources.
Pensions
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will make a statement on the effects on pensioners who receive their pensions by direct credit to bank accounts of strike action currently being undertaken by his Department's staff at Newcastle.
Under the emergency arrangements now in operation, direct crediting is continuing to the accounts of those pensioners who were being paid by the credit transfer method before the industrial action began. If, however, a credit does not arrive on the expected date, the pensioner should contact his local social security office.Pensioners who had applied for payment by credit transfer, but for whom no credit had been made before the industrial action began, should contact their local social security office. They should take their old order book with them, if they have one.
Thalidomide
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will consider banning the use of the drug thalidomide in the United Kingdom.
We have been considering the regulatory status of thalidomide again recently and we intend to consult the Committee on Safety of Medicines on the issue.
Giro Payment Books
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many Giro payment books have gone astray in the north Manchester area during the past 12 months.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Spectacles
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what ways he is considering of excluding unregistered sellers from supplying glasses for the blind and partially sighted; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 24 May 1984 c. 508.]: At the Committee stage of the Health and Social Security Bill I gave an undertaking that we would find some suitable way of reserving dispensing to registered blind people to registered opticians. We will consult on the exact terms of the necessary orders.
People who are registered partially sighted will usually be advised by their medical advisers to obtain glasses from a qualified dispensing optician, but we are not at the moment convinced that the law should deprive all registered partially sighted of the right to choose where they should obtain their spectacles and expose them to possible extra financial costs which might be avoided by the rest of the population. I am still considering representations on the matter.
Public Accounts Commission
National Audit Office
asked the the right hon. Member for Taunton, as Chairman of the Public Accounts Commission, whether the commission has yet appointed an auditor for the National Audit Office.
Yes. The Commission has appointed the firm of Spicer and Pegler. The appointment will be for a period of up to five years from 1 April 1984.
Scotland
Forestry Assets (Sale)
39.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what guarantees he can give that the sale of forestry assets by the Forestry Commission will not damage historic, scenic and scientific woodlands.
There is no evidence to suggest that woodlands of historic, scenic or scientific value will be put at risk if they are transferred from public to private ownership.
Oak Wilt Disease
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether he will outline the action being taken by his Department to prevent the introduction into the United Kingdom of oak wilt disease.
Oak wilt disese is causing the death of oaks in the United States of America, but is not known to occur in any other country. Scientists on both sides of the Atlantic believe that the risk of transmission of the disease on imported sawn oak wood is extremely remote. Nevertheless, the present controls on imports into Great Britain, exercised by the Forestry Commission, are very strict. Oak logs from North America are banned and sawn oak may be imported only if the bark has been removed and the wood has been totally square-edged or has been kiln dried or sterilised by hot water or hot air. Each consignment has to be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the American or Canadian plant health authorities confirming that these requirements have been fulfilled. In addition, the Forestry Commission aims, through its plant health inspections, to examine all consignments of sawn oak wood from North America. Similar controls are exercised by the Department of Agriculture, Northern Ireland.
Ash Die-Back
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what action or research his Department has commissioned into the threat to ash trees through the phenomenon known as die-back; and what is the number of trees thought to have been lost so far as a result of this.
A detailed survey of the incidence of Ash die-back was carried out in east and central England in early 1983 by the department of forestry at Oxford university. It is currently undertaking a research programme, to which the Forestry Commission has made a financial contribution, to identify and examine the main cause or causes of this phenomenon.Although Ash die-back can be found throughout Great Britain, no reliable information is available on the number of trees affected.
Forestry Commission
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will minimise the delay in the presentation to Parliament of the Forestry Commission annual report.
The delays in presenting the Forestry Commission's annual reports to Parliament over the last three years (1980–81, 1981–82 and 1982–83) have been due entirely to difficulties experienced in the preparation of the forestry enterprise accounts. These difficulties were not wholly within the commission's control. The timetable for the preparation of the accounts for the year 1983–84 should allow the next annual report to be presented to Parliament before Christmas 1984.
Labour Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people are currently registered as unemployed in Rutherglen and Cambuslang; and what this figure is in percentage terms.
On 10 May 1984, the latest date for which information is available, there were 2,634 and 1,958 unemployed claimants in the Rutherglen and Cambuslang jobcentre areas respectively. As unemployment rates are only calculated for complete travel-to-work areas, they are not separately available for Rutherglen or Cambusland. On 10 May 1984 there were 94,960 unemployed claimants in the Glasgow travel-to-work area of which Rutherglen and Cambuslang are part, giving a percentage rate of 16·3 per cent.
Jobcentres
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what plans he has for the jobcentres at Rutherglen and Cambuslang.
At its meeting on 26 April the Manpower Services Commission accepted the strategy underlying proposals for the future development of the public employment service. Plans for the jobcentre network in Scotland will be formulated over the coming months in consultation with interested parties. It is not possible at this stage to say what the final plans will be for particular areas. It is the intention, however, to maintain a service in each locality currently served by a jobcentre.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list the districts presently covered by the jobcentres at Rutherglen and Cambuslang.
The Rutherglen and Cambuslang jobcentres cover the district wards of Rutherglen, Fernhill, Cambuslang, Halfway and the eastern fringes of Toryglen and Kings Park. However, they are used by jobseekers from a wider area of Glasgow and display vacancies which occur over most of Glasgow and much of Lanarkshire as well as selected vacancies elsewhere across the country.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many inquiries were dealt with at the two jobcentres in Rutherglen and Cambuslang in the last 12 months for which figures are available.
In the year April 1983 to March 1984 Rutherglen jobcentre and Cambuslang jobcentre dealt with 45,479 and 9,479 jobseeker inquiries respectively. In addition 1,587 vacancies were formally notified by employers to Rutherglen jobcentre and 733 vacancies were similarly notified to Cambuslang jobcentre.
Rural Development Areas
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will now introduce new rural development areas for Scotland similar to those for England and Wales announced by COSIRA on Monday 4 June.
The Scottish Development Agency has a wide range of powers to assist rural areas throughout Scotland, and the Highlands and Islands Development Board operates similar powers within its own area. Further assistance is available through local authorities and other public bodies, and my right hon. Friend has no plans to introduce new rural development areas in Scotland.
Special Development Areas
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list in the Official Report the special development areas in Scotland showing the number of projects approved in each area in the past three years; and if he will show the capital value of each project and the number of jobs actually created.
I shall reply to the right hon. Member as soon as possible.