Written Answers To Questions
Thursday 25 October 1984
Home Department
Custodial Remands (Statistics)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) women and (b) girls are on remand in custody at the latest available date; and how many have been on remand (a) up to one month, (b) one to two months, (c) two to three months, (d) three to four months, (e) four to six months. (f) six to nine months, (g) nine to 12 months and (h) over 12 months.
The most recent information available is given in the following table:
| Estimated population*of untried and convicted unsentenced females in prison department establishments inEnglandandWaleson31 August 1984, by age and length of time since initial remand in custody | ||
| Number† | ||
| Age | ||
| Length of time since initial remand in custody‡ | Under 18 | 18 and over |
| Up to 1 month | 10 | 140 |
| Over 1 month up to 2 months | 5 | 80 |
| Over 2 months up to 3 months | — | 50 |
| Over 3 months up to 4 months | — | 30 |
| Over 4 months up to 6 months | — | 35 |
| Over 6 months up to 9 months | — | 20 |
| Over 9 months up to 12 months | — | 5 |
| Over 12 months | — | — |
| Total | 15 | 350 |
| * Based on records held centrally which are approximate; detailed checking of individual cases would involve disproportionate cost. | ||
| † Rounded estimates; the components do not always add to the totals because they have been rounded independently. | ||
| ‡ Including any time which may have been spent on bail after the initial remand in custody. | ||
Women Prisoners
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if he has any estimate of the number of children belonging to the women in prison at the latest available date;(2) if he has any estimate of the number of children currently taken into care because of the imprisonment of their mother.
This information is not kept centrally and reliable estimates could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many women are currently in prison with their children, where they are located, what are the ages of the children, and what were the offences for which the mothers were charged or convicted.
On 12 October 1984, the latest date for which this information is available, there were 20 women in custody with their children. Six were in Styal, of whom four had been convicted of drugs-related offences, one for wounding and one for burglary. Their children's ages ranged from three days to 18 weeks. Eight were in Askam Grange, of whom four had been convicted of deception, two of theft, one of supplying drugs and one of manslaughter. Their children's ages ranged from six weeks to 14 months. Six were in Holloway, of whom three had been convicted of the importation of drugs, two of theft and one of arson. Their children's ages ranged from three days to eight months.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many pregnant women are currently in prison; where they are located; whether they are on remand or serving a sentence; and what are the offences for which they have been charged or convicted.
Forty-four in custody on 12 October 1984 were known to be pregnant. Ten were on remand: two in Pucklechurch, two in Risley and six in Holloway. Thirty-four were sentenced: one in Low Newton, three in Drake Hall, four in Holloway, 12 in Askham Grange and 14 in Styal. The main offences with which these 44 women were charged or convicted were: theft (16), burglary (6), deception (3), drugs-related offences (3), customs evasion (2), forgery (2), arson, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, failure to comply with a community service order, conspiracy, criminal damage, conspiracy to defraud, false representations, forgery, unlawful taking of a motor vehicle, perjury, handling of stolen goods, breach of a suspended sentence and wounding.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many women who gave birth while in prison awaiting trial or sentence in 1983 and so far in 1984 were (a) acquitted and (b) given non-custodial sentences; how long each had been in custody; and what were the offences with which they were charged or convicted.
I am advised that information about the outcome of court proceedings is available in respect of 13 of the 14 unsentenced women who gave birth whilst in custody between 1 January 1983 and 12 October 1984, as follows. One was acquitted of manslaughter after one month in custody and one acquitted of a drugs-related offence after six months in custody. Two were convicted of burglary and soliciting and given non-custodial sentences, both after two months in custody. Two received hospital orders after three and a half and four and a half months in custody after convictions for arson and deception respectively. Seven were given custodial sentences after one and a half, four, four and a half, five, six, eight and 12½ months in custody. Their convictions related to the handling of stolen goods, theft, drugs-related offences, burglary, robbery and murder.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many women who gave birth to babies in 1983 and so far in 1984 were (a) serving a prison sentence, (b) in borstal, (c) awaiting trial or sentence in custody; and if any children were born in prison.
Of the 121 women who gave birth whilst in custody in the period 1 January 1983 to 12 October 1984, 80 were serving terms of imprisonment and 27 were serving sentences or borstal training or youth custody: 14 were awaiting trial or sentence. All but one was in an outside hospital at the time of delivery.
Asbestos
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will take steps to ensure a standard procedure for prompt liaison between fire services and local authority environmental health officers when asbestos hazards arise from fires such as the one at Claremont industrial estate, Cricklewood, London NW2 on 24 August.
Detailed procedures for liaison between the fire and environmental health services must be decided by local authorities in the light of the particular circumstances. The Department has issued guidance to fire authorities on the dangers from asbestos and how to minimise them. Our officials will now discuss with the fire service, wider local authority interests and the Health and Safety Executive how this guidance might best be supplemented after the Cricklewood experience.
London Fire Brigade
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many London authorities or local authority organisations included in their responses to Cmnd. 9063 comment supporting the retention of a single London-wide fire brigade in London; how many were opposed to the retention of a single fire brigade; and how many suggested special organisation changes for London's Fire Brigade when commenting on section 2.19 of Cmnd. 9063.
Responses to Cmnd. 9063 indicated little support for change in the organisation of the London Fire Brigade. No London borough or local government organisation was opposed to the retention of a London-wide brigade or suggested special organisational arrangements for its management by the joint fire board.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if it is the Government's intention that the setting up of four area committees within the proposed London joint board for fire, combined with the ability of groups of London boroughs to run their own local fire brigades at some future date, should lead to the eventual disbandment of the London Fire Brigade.
No.
British Nationality Act
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent representations he has had concerning the working of the British Nationality Act; and if he will make a statement.
Last week my right hon. and learned Friend and I had a useful discussion with representatives of the General Synod of the Church of England on the working of the British Nationality Act 1981 and the immigration rules.
Local Police Authorities
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will seek powers to remove a chairman of a local police authority; and if he will make a statement.
No. The appointment or removal of a chairman of a police authority is entirely a matter for the authority itself.
Immigration (Mental Disorder)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many persons were refused entry into the United Kingdom on the grounds of mental disorder in each of the last three available years.
The numbers of persons refused leave to enter the United Kingdom on the grounds of mental disorder, as recommended by the port medical inspector, were 124 in 1981, 126 in 1982 and 129 in 1983.
Prison Hospital Officers
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether prison hospital officers who are not professionally qualified nurses attend courses on psychiatric nursing in a secure environment.
Yes. Basic training for hospital officers includes seven weeks, training in psychiatric nursing, involving placements in a special hospital and secure unit as well as a psychiatric hospital.
Mentally Handicapped Prisoners
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what figures are kept by the prison department of the number of mentally handicapped people in prison; how such people are defined for the purpose of keeping such figures; and if he will provide such figures for the last three years, broken down by age, sex and prison.
Figures are kept for the number of prisoners assessed by prison medical officers as severely mentally impaired, and mentally impaired for the purposes of part III of the Mental Health Act 1983. Prior to the enactment of the Mental Health (Amendment) Act 1982 (consolidated in the 1983 Act) the equivalent classifications were severely subnormal and subnormal.On 31 March 1984 there was one severely mentally impaired male prisoner aged 20 held in Swansea prison.The number of subnormal mentally impaired prisoners on 31 March for the last three years, broken down by age, sex and establishment are as follows:
| 31 March 1982 | |||
| Establishment | Subnormal | Age | Sex |
| Ashford | 1 | 20 | Male |
| Blundeston | 2 | 29 | Male |
| 25 | Male | ||
| Cardiff | 1 | 34 | Male |
| Cookham Wood | 1 | 37 | Female |
| Dartmoor | 1 | 38 | Male |
| Gartree | 2 | 27 | Male |
| 25 | Male | ||
| Glen Parva | 1 | 20 | Male |
| Gloucester | 1 | 34 | Male |
| Holloway | 1 | 35 | Female |
| Leicester | 1 | 28 | Male |
| Lewes | 2 | 25 | Male |
| 19 | Male | ||
| Oxford | 2 | 21 | Male |
| 21 | Male | ||
| Reading | 1 | 36 | Male |
Establishment
| Subnormal
| Age
| Sex
|
| Stafford | 2 | 42 | Male |
| 24 | Male | ||
| Swansea | 1 | 21 | Male |
| Wandsworth | 2 | 30 | Male |
| 31 | Male | ||
| Winchester | 1 | 36 | Male |
| Wormwood Scrubs | 1 | 23 | Male |
| TOTAL | 24 |
31 March 1983
| |||
Establishment
| Subnormal
| Age
| Sex
|
| Ashford | 1 | 18 | Male |
| Bedford | 1 | 18 | Male |
| Brixton | 1 | 24 | Male |
| Bullwood Hall | 1 | 19 | Female |
| Dartmoor | 1 | 39 | Male |
| Gartree | 1 | 26 | Male |
| Glen Parva | 1 | 19 | Male |
| Holloway | 6 | 26 | Female |
| 20 | Female | ||
| 38 | Female | ||
| 34 | Female | ||
| 21 | Female | ||
| 38 | Female | ||
| Maidstone | 1 | 45 | Male |
| Manchester | 2 | 20 | Male |
| 37 | Male | ||
| Norwich | 2 | 50 | Male |
| 35 | Male | ||
| Onley | 2 | 20 | Male |
| 20 | Male | ||
| Pucklechurch | 1 | 22 | Female |
| Reading | 1 | 47 | Male |
| Styal | 2 | 21 | Female |
| 30 | Female | ||
| Wakefield | 1 | 37 | Male |
| Wandsworth | 2 | 39 | Male |
| 23 | Male | ||
| Winchester | 1 | 17 | Male |
| TOTAL | 28 | ||
31 March 1984
| |||
Establishment
| Mentally Impaired
| Age
| Sex
|
| Holloway | 10 | 28 | Female |
| 19 | Female | ||
| 18 | Female | ||
| 24 | Female | ||
| 24 | Female | ||
| 20 | Female | ||
| 39 | Female | ||
| 25 | Female | ||
| 28 | Female | ||
| 23 | Female | ||
| Lewes | 1 | 27 | Male |
| Lincoln | 1 | 26 | Male |
| Manchester | 4 | 18 | Male |
| 26 | Male | ||
| 20 | Male | ||
| 47 | Male | ||
| Pucklechurch | 2 | 22 | Female |
| 33 | Female | ||
| Risley | 1 | 20 | Male |
| Styal | 1 | 31 | Female |
| Wakefield | 2 | 38 | Male |
| 21 | Male | ||
| Wymott | 2 | 36 | Male |
| 21 | Male | ||
| TOTAL | 24 | ||
Energy
Natural Gas
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what is his latest estimate of the earliest and latest dates, respectively, when he expects domestic production of natural gas to be less than current or projected demand.
Domestic production of natural gas has been lower than demand in every year since UKCS production started. This is likely to continue for some time to come.
Ncb (Enterprise) Ltd
asked the Secretary of State for Energy whether there is anything in the constitution of the new enterprise company which forbids it operating before the end of the current miners' strike.
No.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy (1) when the new enterprise company will begin operation in mining districts;(2) who will appoint the chief executive and senior officers of the new enterprise company; and when such appointments can be expected.
The appointment of the chief executive and senior officers of NCB (Enterprise) Ltd. will be made by the National Coal Board. I understand that it has almost completed assembling the board of directors. The appointment of the chief executive has been advertised to meet the procedures agreed within the industry. The details of the appointment have to be made known to the management of the NCB so that they can have an opportunity of applying for the post.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy how the new enterprise company will be financed; and how much money it will have at its disposal annually.
The National Coal Board is providing initial funds of £5 million, but this figure will be reviewed as the activities of the company develop.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy how many people the new enterprise company will employ.
The staffing structure has not yet been fixed, but the new enterprise company will be able to draw on the skills of the management of the whole of the National Coal Board and outside professional consultancy firms if necessary, as well as staff it employs directly.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy how the new enterprise company will decide where and on which projects it will spend resources.
This will be a matter for the company.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy with which bodies the Government and National Coal Board consulted before setting up the new enterprise company to fund projects in mining areas.
The new enterprise company will establish communications with all Government and other agencies which provide finance, advice and trading facilities in the localities where the company will be operating.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy who may apply to the new enterprise company for finance for job creation projects in mining areas; and by what criteria applications will be judged.
Any person or firm interested in a project which will bring benefit to a mining community will be able to approach the new enterprise company. The applications will be judged on their potential for providing jobs in these communities.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy whether the new enterprise company is intended to be a permanent feature within the coal mining industry; and if he will make a statement.
It is certainly intended to be a feature for the forseeable future.
New Industry (Castleford)
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what plans there are to introduce new industry into the Castleford travel-to-work area to replace the jobs lost by the pending closure of Glasshoughton colliery and the partial closure of Ackton Hall colliery.
Many miners who chose to take the excellent voluntary redundancy terms available are older men who wish to retire immediately. Others, of course, wish to look for new work, and it was to help them that the new company NCB (Enterprise) Ltd. was set up. NCB (Enterprise) Ltd. supports and initiates job creation efforts in coal industry areas affected by closures and where unemployment is substantial.
Coal Stocks
asked the Secretary of State for Energy how much coal is presently stocked at power stations; and whether he has been informed by the Central Electricity Generating Board of plans to augment those stocks after 25 October.
The latest published figures are for stocks of coal at power stations in Great Britain at the end of August. These show stocks of 15½ million tonnes. The Central Electricity Generating Board has been doing all it can to conserve its coal stocks since the strike began. It has of course kept me informed of the broad position.
Sizewell Inquiry
asked the Secretary of State for Energy if Her Majesty's Government will now consider meeting the cost of the Sizewell public inquiries, including objectors' costs.
The administrative costs of the Sizewell inquiry are being met by my Department and the Central Electricity Generating Board. It is not the Government's policy to meet the costs of parties to public inquiries.
Nuclear Waste
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what studies have been made by or for Her Majesty's Government of the feasibility of safe land storage of nuclear waste; and which of them have been published.
I have been asked to reply.Nuclear wastes can be, and are, stored safely and successfully prior to disposal provided appropriate precautions are taken to safeguard workers and the general public. At sites licensed under the Nuclear Installations Act 1965, it is the responsibility of the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate to regulate such storage. A comparative assessment of alternative waste storage concepts for non-heat generating wastes was made in a report for my Department in April 1983 by Electrowatt Engineering Services (UK) Ltd. (DOE/RW/83.078), which is available in the National Lending Library. Studies on storage of heating-generating waste are described in the published progress reports on my Department's research programme, which are in the Library of the House.
Prime Minister
Wildlife And Conservation
Q30.
asked the Prime Minister if she is satisfied with the co-ordination between the Department of the Environment and the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, in matters relating to wildlife and conservation; and if she will make a statement.
There is always room for improvement.
Liverpool
Q57.
asked the Prime Minister if she has any plans to visit Liverpool.
I visited Liverpool on 2 October 1984. I have at present no further plans to do so.
Engagements
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 25 October.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 25 October.
This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in the House I shall be having further meetings later today. This evening I shall be attending a dinner given by President and Madame Mitterrand.
Chester
asked the Prime Minister if she will make a statement on her recent visit to Chester.
In the course of my visit to Chester and Clwyd on 21 September I saw in operation a variety of youth training and technical education schemes. These were based at British Aerospace (Broughton), Browns department store in the city of Chester, Ysgol Maes Garmon at Mold, and the Wrexham information technology centre.
I was greatly impressed by the effectiveness of these schemes in training young people for jobs, by the enthusiasm of the trainees, and by the dedication of those providing the training.
International Garden Festival
asked the Prime Minister if she will list the names of members of the Government who have visited the International Garden Festival, Liverpool.
In addition to myself the following members of the Government visited the festival:
- The right hon. Michael Heseltine MP
- The right hon. Patrick Jenkin MP
- The right hon. Tom King MP
- The right hon. Michael Jopling MP
- The right hon. Peter Rees QC MP
- John Stradling Thomas Esq MP
- The Lord Bellwin
- The right hon. Kenneth Baker MP
- The right hon. Paul Channon MP
- Mrs. Peggy Fenner MP
- The right hon. The Lord Belstead
- Sir George Young BT MP
- Allan Stewart Esq MP
- Wyn Roberts Esq MP
- The Lord Skelmersdale
Italian Prime Minister (Talks)
asked the Prime Minister if she will make a statement on her recent talks with the Italian Prime Minister, Signor Bettino Craxi.
My talks with Signor Craxi on 18 and 19 October confirmed the excellent state of Anglo-Italian relations. We discussed in depth European Community issues, prior to Italy's assumption of the Presidency of the Community, and how to create an economically successful Europe. We discussed also East/ West relations and other international issues. We agreed that there were good possibilitiies for industrial collaboration following the successful launch of the EH101 helicopter.
Ec Budget
asked the Prime Minister if she will make a statement outlining the progress made in seeking a solution to the European Economic Community budget problem since the Fontainebleau summit.
I have nothing to add to the answer I gave my hon. Friend on 23 October, at column 538.
Libya (British Citizens)
asked the Prime Minister what representations she has received from families of British citizens detained in Libya; what reply she has given; and if she will make a statement.
I have received four letters from the next of kin and at my invitation saw five of them on 17 October. Following a thorough discussion of the situation I assured them that I would pursue every avenue to secure the release of the detainees.
Social Security Commissioners
asked the Prime Minister whether she will consider changing the arrangements for administering the office of the Social Security Commissioners.
I have decided to transfer responsibility for administering the office from the Secretary of State for Social Services to the Lord Chancellor in relation to England and Wales, and for Scotland to the Secretary of State for Scotland. Since the Lord Chancellor is already responsible for advising on the appointment of the commissioners, it makes sense for their office to be administered by his Department. In Scotland, the office will be administered by the Scottish Courts Administration.The necessary transfer of functions order is in preparation, to take effect from 1 January 1985.
Wales
Milk Quotas
asked the Secretary of State for Wales how many farming units, which produced less than 200,000 litres in 1983, have benefited by the reallocation of the quotas that have become available through the surrender of quotas under the outgoers scheme in (a) Wales, (b) Dyfed and (c) the former county of Carmarthen.
The purpose of the outgoers scheme is to purchase 2¼ per cent. of the England and Wales quota which will then be reallocated to those producers who delivered less than 200,000 litres in 1983, in order to return them to their 1983 level of production.Letters of acceptance under the outgoers scheme have been issued to the following prospective outgoers:
| Number | ||
| (a) | Wales | 540 |
| (b) | Dyfed | 252 |
| (c) | The former county of Carmarthen | 97 |
Secondary Schools (Dyfed)
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is the capitation allowance for each of the secondary schools in Dyfed (a) in total and (b) per pupil, for the current year 1984–85; how this compares with the money made available in 1983–84 and in 1979–80, respectively; and how the change compares with the rate of inflation since 1983–84 and 1979–80, respectively.
This information is not held centrally.
Multiple Sclerosis
asked the Secretary of State for Wales (1) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for neuro physiotherapy; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement;
(2) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for nutritional advice; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement.
This information is not held centrally. It is for district health authorities to provide and develop appropriate clinical facilities for those with multiple sclerosis, as indeed for other patients with disabling neurological conditions. Service provision is normally made available from district general hospitals.
asked the Secretary of State for Wales (1) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for group therapy; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement;(2) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for telephone counselling by trained counsellors who have personal experience of the disease; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement.
This information is not held centrally. The development of any specialised scheme would be a matter for local or health authorities as appropriate working in concert with clients and voluntary effort, taking account of local needs.
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for hyperbaric oxygen therapy; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement.
Information on specialist facilities for hyperbaric oxygen therapy is not held centrally. Whilst its effects in the treatment of multiple sclerosis have yet to be assessed and established, hyperbaric oxygen is not made generally available from district general hospitals in Wales.
Trade And Industry
Motor Vehicle Parts
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what information he has as to the extent to which the Monopolies and Mergers Commission's ruling to free franchise holders for motor vehicle parts has affected the percentage of components and, in particular, replacements for imported vehicles, supplied by United Kingdom sources.
Statistical information on replacement car parts of the kind sought by the hon. Member is not readily available at present. However, the Office of Fair Trading is currently conducting a survey with a view to assessing the effect of the Car Parts Order (SI 1146/1982).
Information Technology (Report)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what action he proposes to take in response to the NEDO Report "Crisis facing UK Information Technology"; and if he will make a statement.
The NEDO report acknowledged the significant programmes of support that this Government have established for IT and the success of the many Government initiatives taken. Over the past five years there has been a significant shift in Government resources towards IT but we are not complacent about the problems created by the growth in international competition. We share NEDO's objective of seeking to create a climate in which the UK IT industry will increase its international competitiveness and we shall continue to pursue this objective vigorously.The Government have already given a full response to NEDO's earlier report "A Policy for the UK Information Technology Industry" and we are considering whether any further action needs to be taken in the light of NEDO's latest report. In particular, we share NEDO's concern about the issue of skill shortages in this industry and have therefore established a committee under the chairmanship of my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary to explore the extent of any problems and to propose action to tackle them.NEDO's report has already been discussed at a meeting of the NEDO Council and also in the course of the debate in this House on 21 June, and I see no need to make a further statement.
Value Added Tax
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether his Department has made a study of the potential effects on the book and publishing industry of an imposition of value added tax at (a) the current rate and (b) 5 per cent.; and if he will make a statement on his findings.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
Southend United Football Club
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry when his Department commenced its inquiry into the affairs of the Southend United football club; what were the terms of reference; and when the report of the inquiry will be completed.
My Department is not at present carrying out any inquiries into Southend United Football Club Ltd. Certain matters have recently been brought to the Department's attention and consideration is being given as to whether there is any action my Department needs to take.
Colour Film
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether the undertakings given following the Monopolies Commission report on the supply of colour film in 1966 have been reviewed.
Following publication of the MC report on the supply of colour films in 1966. Kodak gave five undertakings to the Secretary of State. The Director General of Fair Trading has recently reviewed these undertakings and has recommended that Kodak should be released from two of them.The undertakings concerned are the undertaking not to exceed a gross profit level of 61·5 per cent. of the value of sales and the undertaking to abandon resale price maintenance and to reduce recommended prices. Regarding the first of these the Director General considers that it no longer places a real constraint on Kodak's pricing or provides useful information by which to monitor Kodak's performance. He considers the second undertaking was made redundant by Kodak's price reduction in 1966 and the resale prices legislation which imposes a general ban on the maintenance of minimum resale prices.The three undertakings that the Director General recommends should remain in force are an undertaking not to discriminate between retail outlets for colour film products subject to normal commercial considerations; an undertaking to make colour films available to the retailer at prices both inclusive and exclusive of a charge for processing and an undertaking to consider genuine requests for technical help from independent processors who might wish to undertake the processing of Kodak colour films. Undertakings similar to the last two of these were also given by six other companies following the MMC report. The Director General recommends that the undertakings given by these other companies should also remain in force.My right hon. Friend has accepted the Director General's recommendations that Kodak should be released from two of its undertakings but that the other three undertakings given by Kodak and the two undertakings given by the other companies should remain in force. The Director General will continue to keep the colour films market, including the remaining undertakings, under review.
Bus And Coach Council (Radio Frequencies)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if the channel centre frequencies assigned to the Bus and Coach Council confirmed in the letter of 12 September from the Directorate of Radio Technology to the Bus and Coach Council will enable operators to purchase new equipment in good time for a smooth and painless transfer to band III.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
Car Prices
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what representations he has received about proposals to equalise car prices within the European Economic Community; what his response has been; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to the reply 24 October 1984, c.593]: Many representations have been received from manufacturers, dealers, consumer organisations and other interests about the European Commission's proposed regulation to exempt motor vehicle selective distribution systems from the prohibition on restrictive agreements in the European Community's competition rules.In response, we have made clear that in determining its attitude to the Commission's proposals the Government have had to take proper account of the interests of all those likely to be affected by the regulation.Our objective is to achieve a regulation which will prove beneficial to the operation of the EC internal market but which reflects the advantages of selective distribution for motor cars. The Government are continuing to participate in discussions with the Commission to achieve a satisfactory and workable regulation.
Northern Ireland
Multiple Sclerosis
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (1) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for telephone counselling by trained counsellors who have personal experience of the disease; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement;(2) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for neuro physiotherapy; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement;(3) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for nutritional advice; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement;(4) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for group therapy; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement;(5) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for hyperbaric oxygen therapy; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement.
The information is as follows:
The Arts
Books (Vat)
asked the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State answering in respect of the Arts whether the Minister for the Arts has made a study of the potential effects of the imposition of value added tax on books at (a) the current rate and (b) 5 per cent. on national and local library provision; and if he will make a statement.
Local authorities reclaim VAT on their non-trading activities, so that the imposition of value added tax on the purchase of books would not increase the costs of public libraries. The costs of the British Library would be increased by £500,000 per year if value added tax was imposed on books at the current rate, and £167,000 if the tax was levied at a rate of 5 per cent.
English National Opera
asked the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State answering in respect of the Arts what discussions took place between the Office of Arts and Libraries and representatives of the English National Opera, concerning possible financial support from Her Majesty's Government for the English National Opera's recent North American tour.
The chairman of the English National Opera has kept my right hon. and noble Friend regularly informed of the financial situation of the company.
South Bank Board
asked the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State answering in respect of the Arts, pursuant to his reply of 1 August, Official Report, column 302, which individuals have been approached with a view to becoming members of the proposed South Bank Board should the Greater London council be abolished.
None as yet.
asked the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State answering in respect of the Arts, pursuant to his reply of 1 August, Official Report, column 302, what progress has been made in the setting up of the South Bank Board to administer the south bank should the Greater London council be abolished.
Discussions are taking place with the Arts Council.
South Bank Arts Complex
asked the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State answering in respect of the Arts what legal inquiries have been made concerning ownership of the south bank arts complex.
Particulars have been requested of the council's title to properties on the south bank.
Museum Service
asked the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State answering in respect of the Arts, pursuant to his reply of 27 July, Official Report, column 856, if he will detail what discussions have taken place between the Department of Arts and Libraries and district councils concerning the maintenance of an integrated museum service in the event of the abolition of the metropolitan county councils; and how much central funding will be made available.
It is a matter of regret to the Government that the district councils in the Tyne and Wear area have not yet sought discussions on the maintenance of an integrated service after abolition. My right hon. and noble Friend hopes that the successor authorities will react positively to the Government's initiative, to which I referred in my reply of 27 July; and that they will approach him in the near future. Provided satisfactory arrangements can be agreed, the appropriate level of central support would, of course, be part of these discussions.
Kenwood (Open Air Concerts)
asked the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State answering in respect of the Arts what arrangements will be made for the continuation of open air concerts at Kenwood should the Greater London council be abolished.
Ownership and management of Kenwood house and the grounds attaching to it will pass to the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission following the abolition of the GLC. Responsibility for future events at Kenwood will rest with the commission but its chairman, Lord Montagu of Beaulieu, has indicated that he would like the lakeside summer concerts to continue.
National Portrait Gallery
asked the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State answering in respect of the Arts, pursuant to his reply of 5 March, Official Report, column 601, if the Minister for the Arts has had any discussions concerning the construction of a new national portrait gallery on the south bank.
Not yet. The national portrait gallery trustees are also considering other possible ways of providing additional accommodation elsewhere, and will no doubt make proposals to my right hon. and noble Friend when they have assessed the alternatives. It is intended that the option of a south bank site should meanwhile remain open.
Education And Science
Higher Education (Parental Contribution)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what is the revenue saved by the parental contribution to higher education.
It is estimated that in the academic year 1984–85 parents will be asked to contribute about £250 million towards the cost of the higher education of their children.
Education Costs (Assistance)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what conditions apply for public servants, including defence personnel, to be eligible for public funds to assist with their children's secondary school education; and if he will make a statement.
There is no single Government scheme for assisting public servants with the costs of boarding education for their children in the limited circumstances where this is required. Various schemes operate and are the responsibility of the relevant Departments.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what is the number of pupils of secondary school age of public servants, including service personnel currently being publicly funded, and the cost to public funds; and what are the corresponding figures for October 1979 and October 1974.
Information is not collected centrally in the form requested.
Teachers (Salaries)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science (1) if he will publish a table showing the cost of teachers' salaries as a proportion of total expenditure on education, each year since 1979 to the latest convenient date;(2) if he will publish a table showing the cost of teachers' salaries, and the percentage increase, each year since 1979 to the latest convenient date.
The expenditure since 1979 by local education authorities in England on the salaries of school teachers as a proportion of their total net expenditure on schools, and the yearly percentage increases in salaries are as follows:
| Year | Expenditure on Teachers' Salaries (England)*(£ million Cash) | Col. (a) as percentage of Total Net Expenditure on Schools (per cent) | Increase in Expenditure on Teachers' Salaries over the Previous Year (per cent) |
| (a) | (b) | (c) | |
| 1978–79 | 2,709 | 59·5 | 11·2 |
| 1979–80 | 3,066 | 58·9 | 13·2 |
| 1980–81 | 3,880 | 60·9 | 26·5 |
| 1981–82 | 4,302 | 61·7 | 10·9 |
| 1982–83 | 4,550 | 61·7 | 5·8 |
| *Includes salaries plus employers' contributions to national insurance and superannuation. | |||
Books (Vat)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether his Department has made a study of the potential effects of the introduction of value added tax at the current rate and at 5 per cent. on (a) school libraries, (b) university libraries and (c) students in higher education; and if he will make a statement.
The Department has made no such study.
Student Grant
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what are the criteria by which his Department calculates the extra weeks' allowance element of the student grant.
The criterion for calculating the allowance for extra weeks of study is that it should cover those items of expenditure which a student could reasonably be expected to incur as a result of his additional study, including board and lodging and travel.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what is the financial disparity for a medical student during the clinical period of his training between th weekly grant-income, assuming a full grant, and the amount received as the extra weeks' aallowance; and what would be the estimated cost to his Department, expressed as a percentage of the total cost of student grants and as a monetary total, of increasing the extra weeks' allowance to the level of the weekly grant-income.
In 1984–85 for those students living away from home and studying outside London the weekly grant income, assuming a full grant, exceeds the extra weeks' allowance by £14·50. At present grant rates, to increase the extra weeks' allowance for all students to the level of the weekly grant income is estimated to cost about £11 million per annum; this represents approximately 2·3 per cent. of the total estimated cost of undergraduate student maintenance in the current academic year. The cost of increasing the extra weeks' allowance for clinical medical students cannot be separately identified.
Assisted Places Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he will list in the Official Report (a) how many schools are taking part in the assisted places scheme in the academic year 1984–85 and (b) how many schools which wished to take part could not meet the requirement that 60 per cent. of the aided pupils formerly attended maintained schools.
There are now 226 schools in England in the scheme. The answer to the second part of the question cannot be known.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what cost-benefit analysis his Department has carried out of the expenditure involved in the assisted places scheme; to what conclusions it pointed; and if he will make a statement.
The average cost to the public funds of an assisted place is broadly comparable to the average unit cost of educating a pupil in a maintained school. The widening of opportunities which the scheme offers to low-income families represents good value for money.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science on what basis his Department records and studies the examination results of children educated under the assisted places scheme; whether these results have been compared with those of children at maintained schools; and what conclusions he has come to concerning educational standards as a result of the scheme.
Very few assisted pupils have as yet taken public examinations and it would be premature to draw conclusions on the results collected to date. Even with a larger sample, however, great care would be needed in interpreting such output measures.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he will list in the Official Report (a) how many pupils are taking part in the assisted places scheme in the academic year 1984–85 and (b) of these, how many and what percentage attended non-maintained schools (i) at some time in their educational history and (ii) immediately prior to taking up an assisted place.
Returns are not yet available from all schools to permit the first part of the question to be answered. Information is not, however, collected which would permit an answer to the second part of the question in the terms specified.
Examination Results
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether his Department has reached its conclusions about possible methods of comparing examination results from different types of school system; and if he will make a statement.
The Department's work on this is almost concluded and I hope to make a statement soon.
Secondary Schools (Amalgamation)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science in which cases he has rejected proposals put forward by local authorities to close or amalgamate secondary schools pursuant to the Education Act 1980; and what are the reasons for his rejections.
I shall reply to the right hon. Member as soon as possible.
"Parental Influence At School"
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list in the Official Report those organisations and individuals who responded to the Green Paper, "Parental Influence at School" (Cmnd 9242); how many of these submissions supported the proposal that parents should elect, from amongst themselves, the majority of the members of school governing bodies; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 23 October 1984, c. 532–3]: By 22 October, responses had been received from the organisations listed as follows and from 179 individuals. A substantial number of respondents favoured increased parental representation on school governing bodies: 33 expressed themselves clearly in favour of a parental majority. The Government are now considering the way forward in the light of the various comments received.
- Abbott Primary School, Colleyhurst—governors
- Acacias Primary School, Manchester—governors
- Advisory Centre for Education
- Adwick School Parents Association, Doncaster
- Aldingbourne Parish Council
- Alfred Sutton Primary School Association, Reading
- All Saints Junior School Maidenhead—staff
- Alma Park Primary School, Manchester—governors
- Alwyn Infants School, Maidenhead—governors
- Arden Sixth Form College, Manchester—governors
- Ascot Heath Infants School, Ascot—governors
- Ashbury Primary School, Manchester—governors
- Assistant Masters and Mistresses Associations
- Association of Colleges of Further and Higher Education
- Association of County Councils
- Association of District Councils
- Association of District Secretaries—education working group
- Association of Education Officers
- Association of London Voluntary Schools Parents
- Association of Metropolitan Authorities
- Association of Voluntary Aided Secondary Schools
- Aston Branch Labour Party
- Athelney and Elfrida Schools, SE6—governors
- The Avenue School, Reading—governors
- Avon LEA
- Bank Meadow J&I School, Manchester—governors
- Barking & Dagenham Federation of Parent and Parent/ Teacher Associations
- Barnet LEA
- Barnsley LEA
- Bartholomew School, Eynsham—governors
- Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
- Beaver Road Junior School, Manchester—governors
- Beech Grove Primary School, Wellington—governors
- Beechwood J&I Schools, Reading—governors
- Benchill Infant and Junior Schools, Wythenshawe—governors
- Berkshire LEA
- Bexley LEA
- Bidbury Middle School, Havant—governors and staff
- Bilton Primary School, Hull—governors
- Binfield Primary School—governors
- Birches School, Manchester—governors
- Birchfields Junior School, Manchester—governors
- Birmingham Chamber of Industry and Commerce
- Birmingham LEA
- Bishop Wordsworth's School, Salisbury—governors
- Blagdon Nursery School, Reading
- Blakedown First School, Kidderminster—governors
- Bolton LEA
- Boreham Wood Headteachers' Association
- Boston Spa Comprehensive School—governors
- Bournemouth Grammar Schools—governors
- Bowker Vale Primary School, Manchester—governors
- Boyne Hill and All Saints Schools, Maidenhead—governors
- Bradstow School, Broadstairs—governors
- Brent LEA
- Brighton Polytechnic
- Briscoe Land J&I School, Manchester—governors
- British Federation of University Women
- "
- Broadhurst Primary School, Machester—governors
- Broad Oak Primary School, Manchester—governors
- Bromley LEA
- Bromsgrove Education Group
- Brookbury Primary School, Manchester—governors
- Brunel University Department of Government
- Buckden Parish Council
- Buckden School, Buckden
- Buckinghamshire Federation of Head Teachers Associations
- Bucklebury Primary School—governors
- The Bulmershe School, Reading—staff
- Burgess Becker Primary, School, Manchester—governors
- Burnage High School, Manchester—governors
- Burwash Parish Council
- Bury LEA
- Calcot Primary School, Reading—governors
- Calderdale LEA
- Cambridge City Council
- Cambridgeshire Inter-PTA
- Cambridgeshire LEA
- Campaign for the Advancement of State Education (and 4 local groups)
- Campsmount School, Doncaster—governors
- Canterbury Diocesan Education Committee
- Carlisle Diocesan Education Committee
- Castle Camps Parish Council
- Castle Park Primary School, Kendal—governors
- Castleview School, Slough—governors
- Castor School, Peterborough—governors
- Catholic Education Council
- Caversham Nursery School—governors
- Caversham Primary School Association
- Caversham Primary School—governors
- Central Council of Haringey Parent and Parent-Teacher Associations
- Centre for Policy Studies
- Chase Bridge Junior School, Twickenham—governors
- Chelmsford Diocesan Education Committee
- Cheltenham Bournside School—governors
- Cheshire Federation of Parent-Teacher Associations
- Cheshire LEA
- Chevassut Primary School, Manchester—governors
- Chichester Association of Parish Councils
- Chichester High School for Girls—governors
- Children's Legal Centre
- Chorlton Park Primary School, Manchester—governors
- Christchurch Primary School, Caversham—governors
- Christs College School Finchley Parents Association Committee
- Churchend Primary School Reading—governors
- Churches Joint Education Policy Committee
- Church of England Board of Education
- Cippenham First School, Slough—governors
- Cippenham First School, Slough—staff
- Cippenham Middle School, Slough—governors
- Clanfield Middle School, Portsmouth—governors
- Claremont Infants and Junior Schools, Manchester—governors
- Cleveland LEA
- Clwyd Federation of PTAs
- Clwyd LEA
- Coleshill School, Birmingham—staff
- Coley Primary School, Reading—governors
- College Town Infant and Junior Schools, Camberley—governors
- Colleton Primary School, Twyford—governors
- Comberton Parish Council
- Confederation of British Industry
- Conservative Trades Unionists North Humberside Teachers Group
- Conservative Women's National Committee
- Cornwall LEA
- Coventry LEA
- Crazies Hill and Wargrave Schools, Reading—governors
- Crowcombe First School, Taunton—parents and governors Croydon LEA
- Curridge Primary School, Berkshire—governors, parents and teachers
- Darrell Primary School, Richmond—staff
- Davenant Foundation School, Loughton—governors
- Dee High School Action Committee, Cheshire
- Denmead Middle School, Hampshire—governors
- Derbyshire LEA
- Desborough School, Maidenhead—governors
- Devon LEA
- Diocese of Bath and Wells Education Committee
- Diocese of Bristol Education Committee
- Diocese of Durham Board of Education
- Diocese of St. Edmundsbury and Ipswich Education Committee
- Dodford School, Bromsgrove—governors
- Dorset LEA
- Ducie Central High School, Manchester—governors
- Dunnington J&I School, Evesham—governors
- Durham Joint Consultative Committee Teacher Associations
- Durham LEA
- Dyfed LEA
- Ealing Education Advisory Committee
- Ealing Federation of Head Teachers
- East Sheen Primary School, Richmond—governors
- East Sussex LEA
- Eccleston Parish Council
- Elmbrook Junior School, Wokingham—governors
- Elm Road Primary School, Wisbech—governors
- Elstree and Boreham Wood Advisory Committee for Education
- Emmbrook Infant School, Wokingham—governors
- Emmbrook School, Wokingham—governors
- Enborne School, Newbury—governors
- Enfield District Manufacturers Association
- Enfield Grammar School—governors
- Ermysted's Grammar School, Skipton—governors
- Fairlawn Primay School, Lewisham—governors
- Farnham College, Surrey—governors
- The Fawcett Society
- Fernhill School, Farnborough—governors
- Fourfields Primary School, Yaxley—governors
- Fowlmere Parish Council
- Foxhills First School, Southampton—staff
- Foxhills Middle School, Southampton—PTA
- Foxhills Middle School, Southampton—governors
- Friary-Grange School, Lichfield—parents
- Garland School Association, Reading
- Garland School, Reading—governors
- Gateshead LEA
- George Palmer Infants School, Reading—governors
- Gloucestershire LEA
- Gorse Ride Junior School, Wokingham—staff
- Gorse Ride Schools Association, Wokingham
- Gorton Brook School, Manchester—governors
- Gosforth Central Middle School PTA, Newcastle
- Grammar School of King Edward VI, Stratford—governors
- Grange School, Manchester—governors
- Greater London Area Conservative Education Advisory Committee
- Greater London Council Staff Association
- Great Linford School, Milton Keynes—governors
- Greycoat Hospital School, Westminster—governors
- The Grove School, Cambridge—governors
- Grovelands Infant School, Reading—governors
- Gwynedd LEA
- Hampshire Association of Parish Councils
- Hampshire LEA
- Hankham Primary School, Eastbourne—governors
- Haringey Association for the Advancement of State Education
- Haringey Community Relations Council
- Haringey LEA
- Hayes School Parent-Teacher Association, Bromley
- Harrow LEA
- Hatfield School—governors
- Havering LEA
- Haverstock Secondary School, Camden—governors
- Heaton Manor School Association, Newcastle
- Helpston Parish Council
- Hereford and Worcester LEA
- Hereford/Worcester Education Coordinating Group
- Heron Hill Primary School. Kendal—governors
- Herstmonceux Primary School—governors
- High Ham Primary School, Somerset—governors
- Hillside School, Boreham Wood—staff
- Holly Spring Schools, Bracknell—governors
- Holmes Chapel Parish Council
- Holyport Primary School, Berkshire—governors
- Hounslow LEA
- Humberside LEA
- The Hurst School, Baughurst—governors
- Ian Ramsey School, Stockton
- Ilfracombe School—governors
- Information for Organising Office
- Inner London Education Authority
- ILEA Parents Central Consultative Committee
- Inner London Teachers' Association
- Institute of Directors
- Institute of Personnel Management
- Isle of Wight LEA
- Isles of Scilly LEA
- John O'Gaunt School, Hungerford—governors
- John Rankin Infant and Junior Schools, Newbury—governors
- The Judd School, Tonbridge—governors
- Keighley School Governors Support Group
- Kendal Liberal Association
- Kendal Town Council
- Kennet School PTA, Thatcham
- Kent LEA
- Kettlebridge Nursery First School, Sheffield—staff
- The King Alfred School, Burnham-on-Sea—governors
- Kingston LEA
- Kirklees LEA
- Lambeth Conservative Education Advisory Committee
- Lancashire County Council Conservative Group
- Lancaster Royal Grammar School—governors
- The Latymer School, Edmonton—governors
- Leacroft Special School, Manchester—governors
- Leeds LEA
- Leicestershire LEA
- Liberal Education Association
- Liberal Party Education Panel
- Lichfield Diocesan Education Council
- Lincoln Diocesan Board of Education and Training
- Lincolnshire LEA
- Linton Parish Council
- Linton Village College, Cambridgeshire—governors
- Lister Primary School Parents Association, Cleveland
- Little Shelford Parish Council
- Liverpool Socialist Education Association
- Llandaff Diocesan Council for Education
- London Borough of Greenwich Education Sub-Committee
- London Borough of Southwark
- London Diocesan Board for Schools
- Longsight Park School Manchester—governors
- Lymm High School, Warrington—governors
- Lynch Hill First and Middle School, Slough—governors
- Manchester Diocesan Council for Education
- Manchester LEA
- Mandeville Headteachers Liaison Group
- The Manor School, Long Hanborough—governors
- Margaret Ashton College, Manchester—governors
- Marish First School, Slough—governors
- Mengham First School, Hayling Island—governors
- Menston Schools, Ilkley—governors
- Merseyside Association of Local Councils
- Merton LEA
- Methodist Church Division of Education and Youth
- Mid Glamorgan LEA
- Mill House Assessment School, Manchester—governors
- Mill Rythe First and Middle Schools, Hayling Island—governors
- Montsaye School, Northamptonshire—governors
- Moorlands Primary School, Tilehurst—governors
- NAS/UWT
- National Association of Governors and Managers: Sheffield and Inner London Branches
- National Association of Head Teachers: and 6 local groups
- National Association of Inspectors and Educational Advisers
- National Association of Local Government Officers
- National Confederation of Parent-Teacher Associations
- National Confederation of Parent-Teacher Associations (Wales) and one local group
- National Association for Primary Education National Consumer Council
- National Council of Women of Great Britain
- National Deaf Children's Society
- National Educational Association
- National Federation of Women's Institutes
- National Union of Conservative and Unionist Associations: five local or regional Advisory Committees for Education
- National Union of Public Employees (Humberside County Executive Committee)
- National Union of Teachers
- National Viewers and Listeners Association (Midlands Regional Branch)
- Newcastle Federation of PTAs
- Newcastle LEA
- Newham LEA
- Newnham Croft Primary School, Cambridge—governors
- Norcot and Beenham Primary Schools
- Norfolk LEA
- Northamptonshire Chamber of Commerce and Industry
- Northamptonshire LEA
- North Bedfordshire Borough Council
- North Bromsgrove High School—governors
- Northolt First and Middle Schools, Ealing—governors
- North Manchester College—governors
- North Manchester High School for Boys—governors
- North Manchester High School for Girls—governors
- North Tyneside LEA
- Northumberland LEA
- North West Associated Education Authorities
- North West Leeds High School—governors
- North Yorkshire LEA
- Norwich Diocesan Council for Education
- Nottinghamshire Federation of Parent Teacher Associations
- Nottinghamshire LEA
- Nuneaton Conservative Association
- Oakfield First School, Windsor—governors
- Oakfield School, Frome—governors
- Oldham LEA
- Orleans Infant School, Twickenham—governors
- Orton Head Teachers Association, Peterborough
- Owlsmoor School, Berkshire—governors
- Oxfordshire Federation of PTAs
- Oxfordshire LEA
- Pangbourne J & I Schools, Berkshire—governors and staff
- Park Lane Primary School, Peterborough—governors
- Parkside First School, Boreham Wood—governors
- Pendle Primary School, Clitheroe—governors
- Pershore High School—staff
- Peterborough Diocesan Board of Education
- The Pines Junior School, Bracknell—governors
- Plant Hill High School, Manchester—governors
- Prince Albert Governors, Birmingham
- Princess Infant School, Manchester—governors
- Professional Association of Teachers
- Professional Association of Teachers (Wales and one local group)
- Putney Labour Party
- Queen Mary's College, Basingstoke—staff
- Radyr Comprehensive School Association, Cardiff
- Rainford Parish Council
- Ramsey Spinning Infants School, Ramsey—governors
- Reading School Parents Association
- Rectory School, Hampton—governors
- Redbridge LEA
- Regent Farm First School PTA, Gosforth
- Reigate Conservative Association
- Richmond upon Thames LEA
- Richmond upon Thames Federation of Parent and School Associations
- RICE The Right to Comprehensive Education
- Ridgeway Primary School, Reading—governors
- Rivermead School, Reading—governors
- Rochdale LEA
- Rochester Diocesan Board of Education
- Rockcliffe School, Carlisle—governors
- Rodney House School, Manchester—governors
- Rookwood Infant School, Eastleigh—governors
- Royal Grammar School, High Wycombe—governors
- Royce Primary School, Manchester—governors
- Sacred Heart Junior School, W6—governors
- St. Annes Church Council, Baslow
- St. Dunstans Primary School, Manchester—governors
- St. Edwards School, Romford—governors
- St. Helens LEA
- St. Ives Town Council
- St. James Primary School, Gorton—governors
- St. Johns Primary School, Wallingford—governors
- St. Jude's Primary School, Ancoats—governors
- St. Mark's Primary School, Cheetham—governors
- St. Martin's Primary School, Caversham Park—governors
- St. Michael's Primary School, Reading—governors—staff
- St. Michael's Primary School, Withyham—governors
- St. Pius High School—governors
- St. Thomas Primary School, Groombridge—governors
- Salford Priors Infant and Junior School, Worcestershire—governors
- Salford RC Diocese Schools Commission
- Sandwell LEA
- SDP
- Secondary Heads Association
- Secondary Heads Association (Wales)
- Sefton Schools Parents Association
- Service Children's Education Authority
- Senely Green Parish Council
- Settle High School—governors
- Sheffield Chamber of Commerce
- Sheffield LEA
- Sheffield University Division of Continuing Education
- Shropshire Education Watchdog
- Shropshire LEA
- Skinners School, Tunbridge Wells—governors
- Slough Secondary Heads Association
- Society of Education Officers
- Socialist Educational Association
- Solihull LEA
- Somerset County Council Labour Group
- Somerset LEA
- Somerton Infants School, Somerset—governors
- Southcote Primary School, Reading—governors
- South-East Hants First School Headteachers Group
- South Glamorgan LEA
- South Lake Infants School, Woodley—governors
- South Lake Junior School, Woodley—governors
- South Manchester High School—governors
- Southwell Diocesan Education Committee
- South Western Education Committees
- Spalding Grammar School—governors
- Speenhamland School, Newbury—governors
- Springfield Primary School, Reading—governors
- Staffordshire LEA
- Stockport LEA
- Stoke Holy Cross Parish Council
- Stoke Poges First and Middle School—governors
- Stogumber First School, Taunton—governors
- Suffolk Association of Local Councils
- Suffolk LEA
- Summerswood School, Boreham Wood—governors
- Sunderland LEA
- Surrey LEA
- Sutton Education Association
- Sutton LEA
- Swaffhani Prior Parish Council
- Tarnerland Nursery School, Brighton—governors
- Tiffin School, Kingston upon Thames—governors
- Trades Union Congress
- Trafalgar Infants School, Twickenham—governors
- Trafalgar Junior School, Twickenham—governors
- Trelai Junior School, Cardiff—staff
- Turnpike School, Newbury—governors
- UCAC Gwynedd
- Upcroft Junior School, Tilehurst—staff
- Upminster and Cranham Ratepayers and Residents Association
- Waingels Copse School, Woodley—governors
- Walsall LEA
- Walter County Infants School, Wokingham—governors
- Wandsworth Association of School Parents
- Wandsworth Conservative Group
- Warwickshire LEA
- Welsh Consumer Council
- Wessex Infants School, Maidenhead—governors
- Westgate School, Slough—governors
- West Midlands CEOs Group
- Westminster City School—governors
- West Oxfordshire Conservative Association
- West Sussex Association of Parent and Parent-Teacher Associations
- West Sussex LEA
- Westwood Farm Junior and Infant Schools, Reading —governors
- West Wratting Parish Council
- Whitehall Infants School Parents Association, Uxbridge
- Whitworth Park School, Manchester—governors
- Wildridings School, Bracknell—governors
- Willink School, Burghfield Common—governors
- Wiltshire LEA
- Wimblington Parish Council
- Windle Parish Council
- Wirral Federation of Parent-Teacher Associations
- Wirral LEA
- Wirral West Conservative Executive
- Women's Engineering Society
- Woodbridge High School PTA, Essex
- Wyre Forest Constituency Conservative Association
- Yaxley Parish Council
- Yearsley Grove Infant and Junior Schools, York —governors
- York Parents Association
Employment
Community Programme
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he is satisfied with the number of placings on the community programme by the East Ham jobcentre during 1984.
There are no community programme projects in the immediate area served by East Ham jobcentre, but the jobcentre is assisting in filling community programme vacancies in other parts of the London borough of Newham and other nearby London boroughs. Between 1 January and 5 October 1984 the jobcentre placed 42 applicants on to community programme projects.
Newham
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will give the number of those aged under 20 years who were unemployed in the London borough of Newham in May 1979 and at the latest available date; and what is the percentage increase.
The following table gives the figures for unemployed claimants in July 1984, and the figures for registered unemployed in July 1979 (not available for May) in the area covered by East Ham, Plaistow and Stratford jobcentres, which corresponds closely to the London borough of Newham.
| number aged under 20 years | |
| Registered unemployed | |
| July 1979 | 1,569 |
| October 1982 | 3,258 |
| Percentage change | + 107·6 per cent. |
| Unemployed claimants | |
| October 1982 | 3,285 |
| July 1984 | 3,194 |
| Percentage change | - 2·8 per cent. |
Labour Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what were the unemployment figures for the Liverpool travel-to-work area at the latest date.
On 13 September 1984 the total number of unemployed claimants in the Liverpool travel-to-work area was 106,822 and the unemployment rate was 21·1 per cent.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will make a statement on the latest unemployment figures for Merseyside.
It must be recognised that an important influence on the number of jobs is the level of wages. This affects firms' profits, and thus their investment decisions, and competitiveness. In Merseyside, for instance, the average earnings of manual males rose by 7·8 per cent. between April 1983 and April 1984, 2·6 per cent. more than the rate of inflation. In the latter half of 1983, and the first quarter of 1984, our unit wage costs in manufacturing increased significantly whilst those of some of our main competitors were stable or falling.Moderating the growth of real wages will have a significant impact on unemployment, in Merseyside and throughout the country.
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what were the total number of males and females unemployed at each of the employment exchanges in the London Docklands in July 1981, July 1982, July 1983 and July 1984, respectively.
| Males | ||||||
| Jobcentre area | Registered unemployed | Unemployed claimants | ||||
| July 1981 | July 1982 | October 1982 | October 1982 | July 1983 | July 1984 | |
| Bermondsey | 1,659 | 1,913 | 2,023 | 2,326 | 2,484 | 2,579 |
| East Ham | 3,073 | 3,554 | 3,778 | 3,824 | 4,109 | 4,314 |
| Plaistow | 3,254 | 3,762 | 3,634 | 3,113 | 3,114 | 3,224 |
| Poplar | 4,393 | 5,054 | 5,318 | 4,182 | 4,538 | 4,726 |
| Stepney | 4,609 | 5,488 | 4,888 | 4,407 | 4,728 | 4,239 |
| Females | ||||||
| Jobcentre area | Registered unemployed | Unemployed claimants | ||||
| July 1981 | July 1982 | October 1982 | October 1982 | July 1983 | July 1984 | |
| Bermondsey | 416 | 534 | 601 | 637 | 721 | 840 |
| East Ham | 1,142 | 1,237 | 1,465 | 1,530 | 1,757 | 1,954 |
| Plaistow | 1,190 | 1,348 | 1,297 | 995 | 1,043 | 1,092 |
| Poplar | 1,293 | 1,592 | 1,683 | 1,404 | 1,525 | 1,653 |
| Stepney | 912 | 1,000 | 923 | 819 | 883 | 930 |
"Poverty Wages On Merseyside"
asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he has studied the pamphlet "Poverty Wages on Merseyside" published by the Low Pay Unit, a copy of which has been sent to him; and what steps he intends to take in response to this report.
I have read the pamphlet. It discusses a number of issues relating to poverty and low pay. The statistics quoted for the area covered by the north-west (west) division of the Wages Inspectorate (which includes Merseyside) do not give a complete picture. In 1983, 6·6 per cent. of the workers whose pay was checked by inspectors were found to have been underpaid. This is near the national figure of 6·3 per cent. The inspectorate increased visiting activity in the division during 1983 and is doing so again this year.
Youth Training Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Employment what percentage of young people who left the youth training scheme between 1 April and 31 July went into full-time education and training.
A recent sample survey of young people in nine Manpower Services Commission areas who left individual programmes within the youth training scheme between 1 April and 31 July showed that of those who responded 4 per cent. had joined another youth training scheme programme and 2 per cent. had entered
The following table gives the figures for males and females unemployed for the jobcentre areas which correspond most closely to the London Docklands. Figures are also given for October 1982 on both registration and claimant bases. The comparisons are affected by the change in the basis of the unemployment count in October 1982, and the male unemployment figures by the 1983 Budget provisions which meant that some men aged 60 and over no longer had to sign on in order to receive supplementary benefit or national insurance credits.full-time education or training. A further 7 per cent. indicated that they were intending to take up full-time education or training.
Travel-To-Work Areas
asked the Secretary of State for Employment (1) what consideration was given, when drawing up the proposal to include Hinckley within the newly defined Coventry travel-to-work area, to the published information from the 1981 census, indicating that Hinckley has stronger links with other parts of Leicestershire;(2) what consideration was given to the numbers of people travelling to work to Leicester from Hinckley and from Hinckley to Coventry and Nuneaton when the proposal was drawn up to place Hinckley in the Coventry travel-to-work area.
The definition of the new Coventry and Hinckley travel-to-work area was derived from an analysis of the 1981 census data on journeys to work. The methods used in this analysis, which took account of journeys between Hinckley and all other areas, are fully described in "Occasional Supplement No. 3" published with the September edition of Employment Gazette; a copy of which is in the Library.
Overseas Development
Aid (Joint Funding Scheme)
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what the response has been to his decision to allocate an extra £1 million in the current year to projects jointly funded with British voluntary agencies.
There has been an excellent response. In view of the large number of good projects which have been submitted I have decided to make available a further £250,000 for the joint funding scheme in 1984–85.
Scotland
University Of Edinburgh (Dental Hospital And School)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if, further to his reply of 19 December, Official Report, column 78, he will make a statement about the recommended proposal for the establishment of the University of Edinburgh dental hospital and school put forward by the joint university-Lothian health board working party.
A revised proposal for a new purpose-built dental hospital and school was submitted by the Lothian health board to the Scottish Home and Health Department in July. The proposal, together with the other options considered by the joint working party, is being considered by the Department, and discussions have taken place with officials of the University Grants Committee and representatives of the joint working party. A number of important issues require further detailed examination. Substantial capital and revenue costs would be involved in the proposal favoured by the University of Edinburgh and the Lothian health board. The final decision must relate these costs to the expected level of demand for dental graduates in the country as a whole and to the nature and volume of demand for dental services in south-east Scotland.
Standard Grade Courses
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on any representations he has received from grant-aided and independent schools on the operation of standard grade courses.
Throughout the period of preparation, development and introduction of standard grade there has been opportunity for interested bodies to make known their views on the proposed system, on the implementation time table, and on proposals for individual courses. A large number of representative bodies, individual schools, subject departments within schools, and individual teachers have written from time to time on these issues. Letters received from grant-aided and independent schools have not been separately recorded and to do so now would involve disproportionate costs.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what has been the amount of public money given to each grant-aided and independent school to enable participation in the various computer education schemes for schools.
Only George Watson's college, Edinburgh, is involved in the piloting of ordinary grade and standard grade courses in computing studies. Materials at a cost of approximately £250 have been provided.Of the 68 project centres established under the Scottish microelectronic development programme, for which £300,000 was made available, three were in independent schools. No detailed allocation of the resources between centres is available but the value of the equipment provided to the independent schools was about £5,000.The Department of Trade and Industry introduced a 50 per cent. grant in 1981 to help secondary schools acquire computers and associated equipment. The scheme expired in December 1982 and a similar scheme for primary schools expires on 11 January 1985. Separate information on the cost of equipment provided to independent and grant-aided schools is not readily available.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list the grant-aided and independent schools which (a) have participated in pilot schemes associated with standard grade courses and (b) are currently offering foundation level courses.
George 'Watson's college, Edinburgh, is the only school in the grant-aided and independent sector which has been or is participating in the piloting of standard grade courses. It is one of the 23 pilot schools for the proposed foundation course in computing studies. Which grant-aided and independent schools are offering courses at foundation level will start to become clear in 1986 only when candidates are presented for the first examinations, although details of courses offered are usually to be found in the prospectuses produced by such schools.
Grant-Aided And Independent Schools
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what has been the average annual number of teachers employed in grant-aided and independent schools in Scotland in each year since 1980.
The numbers, which are expressed in terms of full-time equivalents and exclude teachers at grant-aided and independent special schools, are as follows:
| Year | No. of teachers (FTE) |
| 1980 | 2,574 |
| 1981 | 2,567 |
| 1982 | 2,509 |
| 1983 | 2,454 |
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what has been the number of pupils attending grant-aided and independent schools in Scotland in each year since 1980.
The numbers, which exclude pupils who attended grant-aided and independent special schools, are as follows:
Year
| Number of pupils
|
| 1980 | 33,587 |
| 1981 | 32,949 |
| 1982 | 32,006 |
| 1983 | 31,808 |
The figure for 1984 is not yet available.
Assisted Places Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the amount awarded to each participating school in 1984 to operate the assisted places scheme.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Strathkelvin and Bearsden (Mr. Hirst) on 9 May 1984, at column 408.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the current number and percentage of places at schools participating in the assisted places scheme expressed in terms of the school roll in each case.
Information about the current roll at a number of the schools participating in the assisted places scheme is not yet available and I shall provide the required figures as soon as they are to hand.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will now publish information on the socioeconomic group by occupation of parents gaining assisted places for their children.
Information about the occupations of parents of assisted pupils is not held centrally.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish in the Official Report a table concerning the assisted places scheme for each participating school showing (a) the number of places made available, (b) the number of applications for places and (c) the number and percentage of applications from parents for children already attending a fee-paying school and the corresponding information for Scotland in total.
Information on the number of places made available in participating schools in the current school session is not yet available, but I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as it is to hand. Information about applications for places made to participating schools is not collected centrally.
Multiple Sclerosis
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for group therapy; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement;(2) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for nutritional advice; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement;(3) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for hyperbaric oxygen therapy; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement;(4) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for telephone counselling by trained counsellors who have personal experience of the disease; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement;(5) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for neuro pysiotherapy; where they are situated; and what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement.
Details of local provision for conditions of this kind are not held centrally, but within their overall assessment of resources and priorities health boards endeavour to provide and develop the range of specialist facilities for the treatment of multiple sclerosis which the hospital consultants concerned consider appropriate. Clinical trials are in progress to evaluate the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Counselling by persons who have directly experienced multiple sclerosis is normally available only through voluntary organisations such as the Multiple Sclerosis Society.
Greenock And Port Glasgow
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list in the Official Report, past, present and future Scottish Development Agency-funded environmental improvement projects in Greenock and Port Glasgow.
Since 1975 the SDA has completed 27 environmental improvement projects valued at £1·77 million in the Greenock and Port Glasgow area. The agency's expenditure plans for 1985–86 include provision for a further seven projects in the area, valued at £630,000.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the approximate total number of jobs created in the past five years by Scottish Development Agency investments in companies in Greenock and Port Glasgow.
The agency estimates that some 600 jobs are associated with the investments which it has made since 1975 in the Greenock and Port Glasgow area. This excludes investments by the agency's small business division, for which details are being obtained. My hon. Friend will reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list in the Official Report past and present Scottish Development Agency investments in companies in Greenock and Port Glasgow.
Since 1975 the SDA has invested a total of £930,000 in seven companies in Greenock and Port Glasgow. This does not include investments by the agency's small business division, for which information is being obtained. My hon. Friend will reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
Coal Industry Dispute
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing for the duration of the miners' strike in (a) Ayrshire and (b) Scotland the numbers of people (i) arrested, (ii) arrested and charged with an offence, (iii) convicted, (iv) acquitted, (v) who applied for legal aid, (vi) who were refused legal aid and for what reason, (vii) given unconditional bail and (viii) given conditional bail; and of those given conditional bail how many had been convicted of previous offences.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible with such information as is available.
Inverleith House
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement about the future use of Inverleith house following the removal of the gallery of modern art.
I am aware of the public interest in the future of Inverleith house, and have considered a number of suggestions regarding its future use. It is my intention that the character of this fine Georgian mansion should be preserved and that the public should continue to have access to it.Accordingly, I have decided that the house should be cared for and maintained by the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, in whose grounds the house stands. The normal exhibition area will reopen to the public next spring following minor internal alterations. There will be two major exhibitions in 1985, one featuring the entries to the Rosyth church architectural competition run by the Property Services Agency, and the other relating to the centenary of the Scottish Office. Details of these will be announced separately.In the longer term, the Royal Botanic Garden will establish standing exhibitions of horticultural and botanical interest. These will include aspects of garden design, including gardens and plants of Scotland, which should be of considerable public interest. I believe that the development of this facility would be unique in the world. The house will also be used from time to time to accommodate exhibitions sponsored by other bodies.
National Finance
Motor Cycle Testing (Vat)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received on the decision to introduce value added tax on part 1 motor cycle testing; and if he will make a statement.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Commonwealth Finance Ministers' Meeting, Toronto
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the Commonwealth Finance Ministers' meeting in Toronto and the annual meeting of the International Monetary Fund.
I attended both meetings, and useful progress was made.
International Debt
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what proposals for inter-governmental action to deal with the international debt crisis he has made; and if he will make a statement.
The British Government have played a leading role in promoting co-operation between Governments, international institutions and banks to tackle the problem of international debt. This co-operation has helped the international financial system respond swiftly and flexibly. The soundest way to create conditions for renewed growth and development is to build on the strategy developed thus far.
Manpower Changes
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) if he will publish an analysis of Civil Service manpower changes for the years 1979–80 to 1983–84 using the same categories as in note 5 in the Treasury's annual report on manpower reductions to the Treasury and Civil Service Committee;(2) if he will publish an analysis of manpower changes in central Government trading funds for the years 1979–80 to 1983–84 using the same categories as in note 5 in the Treasury's annual report on manpower reductions to the Treasury and Civil Service Committee;(3) if he will publish an analysis of manpower changes in the Ordnance Survey for the years 1979–80 to 1983–84, using the same categories as in note 5 of the Treasury's annual report on manpower reductions to the Treasury and Civil Service Committee.
Information in the form requested is not available for 1979–80. For subsequent years it is contained in successive annual reports to the Treasury and Civil Service Select Committee on manpower reductions in the Civil Service. The reports for the financial years 1980–81 and 1981–82 were published as House of Commons Papers Nos 423 (Session 1980–81) and 46 (Session 1982–83); those for 1982–83 and 1983–84 were not published by the Select Committee but copies were placed in the Library of the House for the convenience of hon. Members.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish a table comparable to note 2 of the Treasury's annual report in manpower reductions to the Treasury and Civil Service Committee, showing (a) the numbers employed by individual Departments for each 1 April for the years 1979 to 1984 and (b) changes in employment in numbers and in percentages over the five-year period ending 1 April 1984.
Information in the form requested for the years 1980–81 to 1983–84 is set out in successive annual reports to the Treasury and Civil Service Select Committee on manpower reductions in the Civil Service. The reports for the financial years 1980–81 and 1981–82 were published as House of Commons Papers Nos 423 (Session 1980–81) and 46 (Session 1982–83); those for 1982–83 and 1983–84 were not published by the Select Committee but copies were placed in the Library of the House for the convenience of hon. Members. Departmental manpower numbers covering the financial year 1979–80 are detailed in the Treasury quarterly staff returns for that year, copies of which are available in the Library of the House.
Central Government Trading Funds (Staff)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish a table giving separately the number of employees in each central Government trading fund and the predecessor organisations at 1 April for the years 1970 to 1984.
Following are the staff-in-post figures for each of the four central Government trading funds at 1 April for the years 1970 to 1984. HMSO was granted trading fund status on 1 April 1980, The Crown Suppliers, formally PSA Supplies, on 1 April 1976, the Royal Mint on 1 April 1975 and the royal ordnance factories on 1 July 1974:
| HMSO | The Crown Suppliers | Royal Mint | Royal Ordnance Factories | |
| 1970 | 7,716 | *4,043 | 1,779 | 20,590 |
| 1971 | 7,689 | 3,939 | 1,457 | 19,275 |
| 1972 | 7,440 | 4,111 | 1,387 | 18,963 |
| 1973 | 7,329 | 3,968 | 1,305 | 18,578 |
| 1974 | 7,139 | 3,717 | 1,149 | 18,200 |
| 1975 | 7,183 | 3,792 | 1,402 | 19,014 |
| 1976 | 7,412 | 4,196 | 1,132 | 21,682 |
| 1977 | 7,219 | 4,013 | 1,332 | 22,758 |
| 1978 | 6,864 | 3,722 | 1,444 | 22,851 |
| 1979 | 6,689 | 3,596 | 1,375 | 22,963 |
| 1980 | 6,236 | 3,274 | 1,337 | 21,754 |
| 1981 | 5,956 | 2,996 | 1,286 | 20,804 |
| 1982 | 5,191 | 2,134 | 1,167 | 19,430 |
| 1983 | 4,361 | 1,981 | 1,061 | 18,547 |
| 1984 | 3,660 | 1,970 | 969 | 17,961 |
| * Staff-in-post at 1 November 1970. | ||||
Tax Allowances
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will provide an up-to-date estimate of the cost of the married man's tax allowance in 1984–85; and if he will indicate the amount which represents the cost of the difference between the married man's and single person's allowance.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Mortgage Interest Tax Relief
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if, in the light of increased mortgage interest rates, he will provide the latest estimate of the cost of mortgage interest tax relief in 1984–85 and for the preceding five years.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Child Benefit
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) if he will estimate the administrative cost of taxing child benefit (a) for all taxpayers and (b) for higher rate taxpayers; and in each case how many extra civil servants would be required;(2) what proportion of those currently in receipt of child benefit pay tax; and how many non-tax paying child benefit recipients would be brought under the tax threshold if child benefit were subject to tax.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Value Added Tax
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he has any plans to impose value added tax on certain foodstuffs; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 24 October 1984, c.604]: I refer the hon. Member to the Prime Minister's reply of 12 June to my hon. Friend the Member for Winchester (Mr. Browne), at column 756.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) if he has any plans to levy value added tax on passenger transport fares; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he has any plans to levy value added tax on books and journals; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 24 October 1984, c. 604]: Although the Government are committed to a shift in the burden of taxation from taxes on earnings to taxes on spending, we have no set views at present on how this might best be done.
Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs
Zimbabwe
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on United Kingdom citizens and passport holders detained and imprisoned in Zimbabwe, giving the length of incarceration in each case and the judicial proceedings brought against them, and the result.
The British High Commission in Harare has been notified of seven mono-British citizens detained in Zimbabwe. They have been tried in the Zimbabwean courts and five were found guilty, receiving sentences ranging from life to 15 months, although one of the five is detained in the psychiatric wing of the prison hospital. Judgment has not yet been passed on the sixth. The seventh is now detained under the emergency powers regulations.
Libya
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on United Kingdom citizens and passport holders imprisoned with and without trial in Libya.
Four British citizens are currently serving prison sentences, three following conviction in 1982 and one following conviction in 1984 for offences committed in Libya. A fifth has been charged but not yet brought to trial.Four other British citizens have been in detention since mid-May without charges having been preferred against them. As I said in the reply I gave on 23 October to the hon. Member for Liverpool, Riverside (Mr. Parry) at column 547 we have made, and continue to make, use of every opportunity to pursue the release of the hostages.
Firstland Oil And Gas Plc
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will publish in the Official Report the letter of 9 October 1984 from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary to the hon. Member for Linlithgow about Firstland Oil and Gas plc.
Yes. It is as follows:
In his Written Answer to your Parliamentary Question on 23 July about the licence issued by the Falkland Islands Government to Firstland Oil and Gas plc for on-shore oil prospecting (OfficialReport, Vol 64 c. 507), Ray Whitney undertook to write to you once we had received precise details of the terms of the licence. These have now arrived.
The licence was issued on 19 July and covers an area of about 136,000 acres owned by Falkland Islands Properties Limited, and known as Douglas Station. Its terms may be summarised as follows. It confers on Firstland Oil and Gas plc the exclusive right, subject to compliance with detailed terms and conditions, to explore for and win oil and gas from the area for four years. A work programme with which the licensee must comply is stipulated. The Civil Commissioner may annually renew the licence for a maximum of a further three years, subject to the agreement of a further work programme. Thereafter, the licensee may be granted an oil mining lease. Rents and any royalities due from oil and gas discovered are payable to the Falkland Islands Government.
Iran (Support Vessels)
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he is satisfied that the two support vessels constructed in the United Kingdom under contract for the Iranian Government cannot be used in the Arab conflict in the Gulf war; and if he will make a statement.
The two vessels currently under construction for the Iranian Government at Yarrow Shipbuilders are unarmed support vessels, particularly suited for disaster relief operations, with extensive medical facilities.We do not consider that they have any relevance to the conflict between Iran and Iraq, nor to attacks on shipping in the Gulf.
Cyprus (Foreign Radio Stations)
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is his policy towards requests from foreign Governments to site their radio stations within Britain's two military bases on Cyprus; and if he will make a statement.
In considering any request, we would need to take into account all relevant factors, including British commitments in connection with the treaty of establishment.
South Africa
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what action Her Majesty's Government now intend to take arising from the decision of the South African authorities not to allow the four South Africans who were charged with various criminal offences back to face trial in the United Kingdom.
I refer the hon. Member to the statement I made on 23 October at column 65.
Terrorists (Central America)
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is his policy regarding the admission to Great Britain of terrorists from Central America.
I have been asked to reply.Any person subject to control under the Immigration Act 1971 against whom there is evidence of involvement in terrorist activities is liable to be refused admission on the ground that his exclusion is conducive to the public good.
Transport
Roadworks (Expenditure)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will publish in the Official Report a comparison of public expenditure in percentage terms on roadworks in the United Kingdom and other member states in the European Economic Community.
The Department does not keep records of this kind. However, information on infrastructure spending on roads in each member state of the European Community can be found, for the period up to 1981, in the eleventh report from the Commission to the Council on "Expenditure on and Utilization of Rail, Road and Inland Waterway Infrastructures" issued earlier this year—reference COM(84)282. My hon. Friend may find the summary tables on pages 80 and 81 of particular interest. Definitions of public expenditure vary widely from country to country, so direct comparisons of spending rates could be misleading.
Rothwell (Bypass)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what steps he has taken to review the case for a bypass to the town of Rothwell, Northamptonshire.
A preliminary study is currently being carried out into the case for a bypass for Rothwell.
Air Fares
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on his decision to reject the application by British Airways and other airlines to cut the winter's transatlantic air fares.
Over the past few months a number of British and American airlines operating scheduled north Atlantic passenger services sought approval from the United Kingdom and United States Governments for permission to make significant reductions in a number of economy fares. When the fares were filed, Virgin Atlantic objected to them as being predatory.In assessing the fares, the CAA therefore looked carefully at the economics of the proposals but concluded that in the context in which they were being offered, the fare levels appeared to be generally acceptable. Nevertheless, there was concern about the possible risk that, even with the approval of these fares by both Governments, British airlines could still be faced with United States anti-trust actions based on allegations of predation under United States anti-trust laws. Her Majesty's Government do not accept that such anti-trust actions would be consistent with Bermuda II, but in view of the current actions being pursued in the United States in connection with the collapse of Laker Airways it seemed prudent to seek reassurance from the United States Government that the proposed new fares could not be used as a basis for future anti-trust actions. The United States Government have not yet provided this reassurance.I am naturally very disappointed that the lack of response by the United States Government to date deprives travellers of the benefits of these lower fares. I hope, however, that the necessary reassurance will be forthcoming shortly in terms which will allow the airlines to refile their proposals.
Airline Passengers (Baggage Rules)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what is the policy of Her Majesty's Government towards the new personal baggage rules proposed for airline passengers by the Civil Aviation Authority; if he will seek to ensure that such rules are introduced by all international airlines; and if he will make a statement.
The Civil Aviation Authority has a statutory responsibility for regulations relating to the carriage and stowage of cabin baggage in British registered aircraft. The amount of hand baggage passengers are taking into the cabin has tended to increase and the authority is consulting the aviation industry and associated organisations about amendments to articles 27 and 33 of the Air Navigation Order 1980, which it proposes to recommend to the Secretary of State.The carriage of cabin baggage on foreign registered aircraft is the responsibility of the state of registry through its national regulations and not of Her Majesty's Government. We can of course seek to persuade other countries to follow the example of any changes which we adopt.
Public Transport Integration, London
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what steps are being taken to ensure the earliest possible introduction of further measures of public transport integration in London.
British Rail and London Regional Transport have a duty under the London Regional Transport Act 1984 to co-operate for the purposes of coordinating the passenger transport services they provide. My right hon. Friend has set the chairmen of BR and LRT objectives for closer co-operation, and a programme of work is being carried forward under the new London Passenger Transport Group. BR and LRT have already agreed on the early introduction of a new joint BR/LRT travelcard.
London Regional Transport
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make available submissions and communications which he receives from London Regional Transport in a similar manner to that adopted by the Greater London council when London Transport was under its control.
Subject to the specific requirements of the London Regional Transport Act 1984, we shall be guided by principles similar to those followed for nationalised industries generally when deciding what submissions or communications from London Regional Transport to make public. It is the Government's policy to make available as much information as possible, while preserving the confidentiality essential to the effective working of government.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many submissions or communications he has received from London Regional Transport since it was established.
My Department does not keep a record of the number of communications received from London Regional Transport. My officials are in close touch with LRT over a wide range of matters.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to receive London Regional Transport's first business plan in accordance with section 29 of the London Regional Transport Act 1984.
It is for LRT management to decide when to publish its first annual business plan. I understand that it has it in mind to publish a plan before the end of the year.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what has been the response from London Regional Transport to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission report, published on 1 February, on the arrangements made by the then London Transport Executive (LTE) for the maintenance of buses and coaches; and if he will make a statement.
London Regional Transport, which took over the responsibilities of the former London Transport Executive on 29 June 1984, has considered the report and prepared a response, copies of which I am placing in the Library of to House. The response demonstrates LRT's ready acceptance of most of the commission's recommendations and the considerable action that has already been taken to implement many of them. I welcome LRT's positive response to the report so far. My Department will continue to monitor developments and I shall make another statement next year on the further progress made in implementing the commission's recommendations.The commission found that the cost acounting and management control systems employed by the then London Transport Executive were inadequate and recommended a number of substantial improvements, including in particular the establishment of engineering cost centres for each garage and the introduction of cost reduction targets in such a form that their achievement largely rests with the management at the individual garages and works. This is a matter of fundamental importance. I welcome the action which LRT has already taken towards the introduction of a rigorous cost accounting system with clearly defined levels of accountability and the application of cost reduction targets at district and garage level, and I look forward to the achievement of further progress in this area.The commission drew attention to the need for an improvement in maintenance standards, noting that a high proportion of LTE vehicles were at that time failing Department of Transport spot inspections. Proposals to improve performance in spot inspections are in hand, and I shall expect to see the necessary improvement achieved and sustained.The commission made a number of recommendations for improving the efficiency of LTE's maintenance at garages and workshops. LRT is in the process of reviewing the efficiency of maintenance at its garages and is implementing a bus workshops restructuring programme which is intended to secure major improvements in productivity. It recognises that further progress is still required to reduce overmanning and improve working practices. I am encouraged by the progress which has been made so far and look forward to the effective implementation by LRT of the further measures which it has in hand.The commission was critical of LTE's complex industrial relations structure which it identified as a source of inflexibility and reluctance to change. It commented on the need for management to adopt a much more positive approach to the management of change. I am pleased to note that LRT accepts this criticism. While recognising the need for a sensitive approach which commands general consent, I expect to see substantial progress in this area.I am grateful to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission for this thorough and constructive report, which is already leading to considerable improvements in the efficiency of the bus maintenance activities which are now the responsibility of LRT.
London Transport Executive
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether any of the members of the London Transport Executive who were removed from office by him when London Transport was nationalised have been paid compensation in accordance with section 70(3) of the London Regional Transport Act 1984.
My right hon. Friend hopes to settle very shortly the final amounts payable in compensation to the members of the London Transport Executive whose appointments terminated on the formation of London Regional Transport.
River Thames
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he is now in a position to publish his conclusions concerning the future management, replacement and additions to ferries, bridges, tunnels and piers of the river Thames currently the responsibility of the Greater London council.
I am considering the views of London boroughs in response to the document which I sent them on 31 July. I shall announce as soon as possible my conclusions.
Stansted Airport
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many representations he has received about the development of a third London airport at Stansted; how many have been (a) favourable to such a development and (b) unfavourable; and if he will make a statement.
Twenty one letters have been received since the close of the Stansted/Heathrow terminal 5 public inquiries specifically supporting or opposing the development of Stansted. Of these, 19 have been opposed to the development of the airport.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what discussions he has had with the North of England regional consortium about its opposition to the development of a third London airport at Stansted; and if he will make a statement.
None. It would not be appropriate for me to discuss the merits of the British Airports Authority's planning application to develop Stansted with any of the parties to the recent public inquiries in view of the Secretary of State for Transport's statutory responsibility for the decision on the planning application.
Seafarers (Medical Standards)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what further action he intends to take following the report of the working party set up by the faculty of occupational medicine of the Royal College of Physicians on medical standards for seafarers; and if he will make a statement.
The report has generally been welcomed by both sides of the industry, subject to some reservations. I expect to appoint soon a medical adviser whose main job will be to promote the consistent application of the medical standards partly through an exchange of information between the medical referees. The adviser will also keep the medical standards under review. One of the recommendations of the report is that the number of approved doctors should be reduced. To this end the shipowners have agreed to review the list of doctors submitted by them, and new approvals will be made only in case of real need. Finally, I am giving favourable consideration to the recommendation that medical referees should ask the advice of an appropriate consultant in every case of an appeal.
Heathrow Airport
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what progress has been made with plans for the construction of a terminal 5 at Heathrow airport; and if he will make a statement.
A planning application submitted by Uttlesford district council for the construction of a fifth terminal at Heathrow was considered at the recent public inquiries that also heard evidence on the British Airports Authority's planning application to develop Stansted. The inspector's report on these inquiries is expected shortly.
Civil Aviation
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he intends publishing a White Paper on civil aviation; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend published on 5 October a White Paper on "Airline Competition Policy", (Cmnd. 9366).
British Airways (Falkland Islands Contract)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on the respective roles of his Department and the Civil Aviation Authority in the awarding of the contract to British Airways to convey cargo and passengers between the United Kingdom and the Falklands Islands; and if he will make a statement.
The contract Ito which the hon. Member refers is a matter for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence. My Department, as sponsor of British Airways, is kept informed of the negotiations, but the Civil Aviation Authority is not involved.
Nuclear Waste
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will order a public inquiry into the proposed transport of nuclear waste material from Torness power station by rail.
No. Transport of nuclear waste material takes place under well-established safety regulations and I know of no need for a further inquiry.
British Midland Airways
asked the Secretary of State for Transport on what occasions in the last two years he has met representatives from British Midland Airways; and what subjects were discussed.
The Secretary of State has met British Midland Airways representatives on five occasions in the last two years to discuss subjects of common interest.
Scottish Lowland Airports
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether any assurances have been given to British Midland Airways concerning the review of Scottish lowland airports.
No.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether the review of Scottish lowland airports was discussed at any of the meetings held by his Department on the subject of the Civil Aviation Authority report.
No.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what representations he has received from British Midland Airways concerning the review of Scottish lowland airports.
None.
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Agricultural Land
14.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food by how many acres the estimate of all land classified as agricultural has increased or decreased in the last 12 months for which figures are available.
For England, the average annual loss of agricultural land to development or other uses for the five-year period ending June 1983 is estimated to be 14,000 hectares—35,000 acres.
Conservation
15.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will bring forward proposals to encourage and assist farmers to continue conservation of the rural environment.
My Department already plays a major role in encouraging good farming practices which are beneficial to the rural environment. I attach great importance to this.
Milk Quotas
16.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement about progress in determining additional milk quotas for dairy farmers considered to be special cases.
Good progress is being made by the Dairy Produce Quota Tribunal and its local panels. We have taken steps to increase the number of members of the tribunal and panels to assist them in their task. All applications are being dealt with as quickly and as fairly as possible.
20.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what steps is he taking to deal with flexibility of milk quotas either by sale or leasing.
Under the present Community rules, quota can only be transferred with an appropriate amount of land. We are very much aware of the inflexibility this imposes and will be seeking changes in the light of discussions we shall be having with the United Kingdom industry.
21.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on the manner in which the dairy quotas are being implemented in other Common Market countries.
The EC regulations on dairy quotas provide for two ways of implementing the system, either through a levy on each individual producer's excess of production over quota—formula A—or by a levy on each dairy's excess of purchases over quota—formula B. All member states except Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in respect of Northern Ireland have opted for formula B. Italy has not yet made a final choice. The Agriculture Commissioner has made it clear that most member states have the necessary national legislation in force to implement these requirements, and that considerable progress has been made in establishing the administrative procedures.We have repeatedly stressed, most recently at the Agriculture Council this week, that it is essential that the levies be applied by all member states according to the agreed rules. This is fully supported by the Commission and increasingly, as we make the point, by the great majority of member states. We shall continue to watch the situation carefully and to keep pressing this aspect to which we attach great importance.
Agricultural Surpluses
18.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what steps he is taking to use the discipline of price to avoid the growth of common agricultural policy surpluses other than milk.
I shall continue to press for price restraint for CAP commodities as the best way of reducing agricultural surpluses and containing CAP costs.
Bread-Making Wheat
19.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on the intervention price for bread-making wheat.
In our view, intervention buying for bread-making wheat at a price higher than that for feed grains is unnecessary. We welcomed the agreement at this year's price-fixing to reduce the gap between the two prices from 10·3 per cent. to 7 per cent. We will continue to press for the further reduction, and preferably the elimination, of this gap.
Glasshouse Growers (Gas Prices)
22.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what action he proposes to take to defend the interests of British glasshouse growers in view of the agreement made by the Dutch Gas Corporation to reduce the price of gas for Dutch growers; whether he regards this action as fair trading; what representations he is making to the European Economic Community about it; and if he will make a statement.
On the day the decision to reduce gas prices to Dutch growers was announced, I took the matter up with both the European Communities Commission and the Dutch Minister of Agriculture in Luxembourg. I followed this up in writing and, with Ministers of other member states, re-emphasised at the EC Council on 23 October the urgent need for the Dutch to comply with the agreed arrangements for determining the gas price for their horticulturists. I have made clear how seriously we view this issue; and it is helpful that other member states have also made strong representations.The Commission has asked the Dutch Government to provide information to justify their action by the end of this week. This request will be considered the first step in a case by the Commission against the Dutch Government if the information received is not satisfactory. I intend to take all possible steps to ensure that the matter is pursued vigorously and speedily.
Environment
Telecommunications Development
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he has reached decisions on the extensions to the general development order proposed in respect of telecommunications development in his Department's consulation paper of 23 January.
My right hon. Friend and I have been considering very carefully the many responses received to the consultation paper on proposed amendments to the general development order, including those relating to telecommunications. It is our aim to ensure that the planning system reflects this Government's policy of liberalising telecommunications development while at the same time providing adequate protection for environmentally sensitive areas. Against this background, and in the light of representations received, we have concluded that permitted development rights should be granted on the following lines in a revised GDO.The installation of minor telecommunications apparatus by telecommunication operators to whom the powers in the telecommunications code have been applied will become permitted development. This will cover the installation of and replacement of apparatus underground; the installation of new telecommunication apparatus above ground, provided that apparatus does not exceed 15 m in height; the replacement of existing apparatus, up to 15 m or the height of what is replaced, whichever is the greater; and the use of land in an emergency for stationing mobile apparatus. When apparatus is erected on buildings, these permitted development rights will apply provided that the apparatus does not increase the height of the building by more than a specified amount (6 m for buildings of up to 15m; 8 m for buildings of 15m or more but less than 30 m; and 10 m for buildings of 30 m or more). The GDO permission will also extend to the installation of minor telecommunications apparatus on land owned by telecommunications code operators. This general permission will not however cover mircowave aerials, which I shall deal with later in the answer.Code operators carrying out work under the powers in the code will be required to act in accordance with the conditions of the licence issued to them under the Telecommunications Act, which will include such conditions as the Secretary of State considers requisite or expendient to protect the physical environment and the natural beauty and amenity of the countryside. These conditions, which are subject to public consultation before a licence applying code powers is granted, will have the effect of restricting the operation of the GDO permission in certain circumstances. By way of example, the BT licence already granted lays down procedures (including consultation with he local planning authorities) which the operator must follow if he wishes to install apparatus in, for example, conservation areas. National parks, or areas of outstanding natural beauty. We consider that the system of licence conditions, which the Secretary of State can amend if it is necessary to do so in order to ensure that the environment is properly protected, provides the flexibility for dealing with the needs of locally sensitive areas; it would be unduly complex and impracticl to spell out all these differing conditions in the GDO itself. We intend however that the GDO permission for development by code operators should be tied to development which is carried out in accordance with the conditions in the licence relating to the exercise of code powers.The consultation paper proposed permitted development rights for small mircowave aerials on non-domistic buildings of not less than 15 m high. In the light of consultation we are persuaded that the requirements of telecommunications justify some slight relaxation of the limits proposed in the paper. We therefore intend to make this right available for up to two microwave dishes per non-domestic building, bearing in mind that in many cases two aerials may be necessary to enable reception and onward transmission of signals, provided that those aerials do not exceed 1·3 m in diameter; and that they do not increase the height of the building by more than 3 m. We are also considering imposing a general condition that these aerials should be sited to minimise visibility from the highway. This additional permission will not apply in relation to such aerials in national parks, areas of outstanding natural beauty, on listed buildings or in conservation areas.I am satisfied that these proposals represents a reasonable balance between the requirements of modern telecommunications and those of the environment. We intend to lay these amendments before the House as soon as possible—probably early next year. In the interests of ensuring that new telecommunications developments can take place within a clearly defined planning framework, we shall if necessary lay these amendments before the further amendments and consolidation of the GDO proposed in the January consultation paper. In the meantime, we shall look to local authorities and telecommunications operators to bear these intentions in mind when considering proposals for development.I understand that my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales agrees that these provisions should also apply in his area of jurisdiction; and my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Scotland intends to lay amendments to the Town and Country Planning General Development (Scotland) Orders 1981–1984 incorporating substantially the same provisions, at about the same time.
Local Government Reform
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the estimated cost to the Liverpool city council of taking on the liabilities of the Merseyside county council in event of abolition; if these costs will include further rate-capping penalties; and if he will make a statement.
It is too early to say. Much will depend on how Merseyside organises its spending next year—its last year of existence.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he intends to consult the Greater London council, the London boroughs, the local authority associations and voluntary housing bodies over the changes to his proposals to abolish the Greater London council housing role from those outlined in "Streamlining the Cities", Cmnd. 9063.
The changes we have announced have been designed to meet many of the concerns expressed by those responding to "Streamlining the Cities" and the associated consultation paper. When making the announcements, we promised further consultation with those affected on the details of the new arrangements.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what response was made by the London boroughs of Greenwich and Bexley to the proposal in paragraph 18 of his consultation paper "Streamlining the Cities: Housing" that the Greater London council's dwellings at Thamesmead should be transferred to one or both of the boroughs in which they lie in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
Greenwich foresaw practical problems in taking on the public sector housing stock, which would require a considerable lead-in period. Bexley considered that, pending a review of boundaries, management of the stock should pass to Greenwich alone.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he expects to announce his proposals for the future of Thamesmead in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
We have already announced that we are now exploring in detail the possibility of transferring ownership to a trust along the lines of the Stockbridge village trust at Knowsley. We intend to undertake full consultation with the tenants at Thamesmead before reaching a decision.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many responses he received from consortia of private developers to the invitation extended in paragraph 19 of the consultation paper "Streamlining the Cities: Housing" to contact him concerning the possible sale of the development land at Thamesmead.
The responses we received are regarded as being a matter of commercial confidence.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) which body will be responsible for assessing the housing requirements of London as a whole, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;(2) what account he has taken of the response received to the proposals in "Streamlining the Cities; Housing" to repeal without replacement the Greater London council's statutory duty to carry out research and provide information on London's housing in formulating his latest proposals for abolishing the Greater London council.
We have carefully considered the responses received but concluded that we should adhere to our original proposals.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how he intends to ensure that the London Planning Commission will have adequate up-to-date London-wide data on which to base its advice on strategic minerals policies matters in the event of the abolition of the Greater London council.
It will be for the London Planning Commission to decide how best to advise my right hon. Friend on strategic issues such as minerals planning.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if, in taking account of the Greater London council's statutory duty to renovate the housing stock transferred to the London boroughs in the mechanism to ensure that the broad financial effects of the Greater London council's obligatory revenue contributions are maintained in the event of the Greater London council being abolished, he will ensure that individual boroughs receive the same annual sum as they would have received from the Greater London council in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;(2) if he will ensure that no individual London borough suffers any additional net cost as a result of the removal of the Greater London council's statutory obligations to make revenue contributions under the housing transfer orders in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;(3) what will be the mechanism for maintaining the broad financial effects on transferred authorities of the Greater London council's obligatory revenue contribution under the housing transfer orders in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
We intend that the broad financial effect on individual boroughs of the GLC's obligatory revenue contributions should be maintained through the arrangements for rate support grant distribution following the GLC's abolition.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what factors he will take into account in setting the upper limit for expenditure on the collective funding of voluntary bodies by the London boroughs, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
The consultation paper issued on 20 September set out the Government's preliminary view that a limit of £10 million a year in Greater London would be appropriate. We have undertaken to consider this further when more detail about existing grant-giving becomes available and in the light of plans for the use of the collective arrangements.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if spending by individual boroughs under the proposed arrangements for the collective funding of voluntary housing bodies in the event of the Greater London council being abolished will count against their spending targets.
No decisions have been taken on the formulation of spending targets, if any, for 1986–87 and for subsequent years.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what method will be used to distribute to the London boroughs that part of the Greater London housing investment programme allocation which would have gone to the Greater London council, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;(2) if London borough housing investment programme allocations will be increased so as to allow ex-Greater London council housing stock transferred to the London boroughs to be renovated to modern standards by 1992 with no detrimental effect on other borough capital programmes, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;(3) what effect his proposals for abolishing the Greater London council will have on commitments to renovate ex-Greater London council housing stock transferred to the London boroughs, as set out in the transfer orders.
The entire London housing investment programme allocation will be distributed among the boroughs, taking account of their needs for capital expenditure on housing, including such liabilities as they inherit from the Greater London council. It will be for the borough councils to decide the purposes for which they use the capital resources available to them, in the light of local needs and priorities.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many different bodies will assume responsibility for part of the Greater London council's housing activities in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
In addition to the councils of London boroughs and the corporation of the City of London, the councils of non-metropolitan districts with GLC seaside and country homes—which already have housing responsibilities—my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State, the Greater London residuary body and possibly a trust for Thamesmead. It will be for these bodies to decide whether, within their powers, to involve other organisations in the exercise of these responsibilities.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if capital receipts from the sale of Greater London council housing land would be made available to the London boroughs to supplement their housing programmes in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
We intend that in general the prescribed proportion of receipts generated by the Greater London residuary body through the disposal of surplus property should be made available to the boroughs.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if the ownership of the Greater London council seaside and country homes will pass to the district councils in which they lie in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
This is the intention, subject to the vesting in the Secretary of State of nomination rights to the great majority of the lettings.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what proposals will be made for funding voluntary housing bodies active in more than one borough if the prescribed majority of London boroughs decided not to utilise the proposed statutory machine for collective funding in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
If the London boroughs decided not to use the proposed machinery for collective grant-giving, voluntary organisations would have to seek funding from individual boroughs and other existing funding bodies. One of the objectives of abolition is to put these kinds of decision into the hand of the most accountable elected local councillors, which is where they properly belong. The London Boroughs Association has already announced its decision to invite 61 organisations providing for the single homeless to apply for grants under the proposed collective arrangements.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will ensure that the distribution to the London boroughs of capital receipts from the Greater London council mortgage account will reflect the location of housing association schemes originally funded by the Greater London council and needing additional funding for repair works, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;(2) if he will ensure that the distribution to the London boroughs of capital receipts accruing to the Greater London council mortgage account will match the current pattern of the Greater London council's spending of those receipts, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;(3) if all the prescribed proportion of the capital receipts accruing to the Greater London council mortgage account will be distributed to the London boroughs in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;(4) which body will be responsible for distributing to the London boroughs the capital receipts accruing from the Greater London council mortgage account in the event of the Greater London council being abolished; and on what basis the distribution will be made.
Paragraphs 2.6.6 of my Department's publication of 31 July on the transfer of functions announced that in general the capital receipts associated with the Greater London council's mortgage account would become available to the councils of the London boroughs. The detailed arrangements involved will be announced in due course.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what will happen to the capital receipts from housing association schemes originally funded by the Greater London council, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;
(2) which bodies will be responsible for funding repair work on housing association schemes originally funded by the Greater London council, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;
(3) when he expects to announce his proposals for the arrangements for dealing with housing association schemes originally funded by the Greater London council in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
An announcement about the arrangements for housing association schemes will be made as soon as possible.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what plans he has to consult individual mortgagors over his proposal to transfer the Greater London council's mortgage account to a successor body, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
I shall answer this question shortly.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what practical measures he proposes to increase the attraction of the eastern sectors of Greater London and to steer developments to those sectors in line with his letter of 23 March to the chairman of the erstwhile standing conference on London and south-east regional planning; in the event of the Greater London council being abolished, what effective strategic machinery will be provided to this end; and what additional resources will be made available to increase the attractiveness of the eastern side of Greater London.
My right hon. Friend's letter of 23 March to the standing conference was strategic guidance of the sort which might well be issued to local planning authorities post-abolition, following advice to my right hon. Friend from the proposed London planning commission. As the letter pointed out, the effective attraction of development towards the eastern sector of Greater London will require the active co-operation of all the agencies involved, in conjunction with the development control policies of the local planning authorities throughout the region. It was the failure of the GLC to provide effective machinery for increasing the attractiveness of London's east end which led this Government to establish the London Docklands Development Corporation.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has set up a Greater London department within the Department of the Environment.
No.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what assessment he has made of the additional professional staff in his Department who will be required to prepare and consult on the strategic policy guidance he proposes to issue to the London boroughs in the event of the abolition of the Greater London council, to co-ordinate the preparation of their separate unitary plans, to check that the unitary plans are in conformity with it and to ensure a satisfactory coverage of unitary plans throughout Greater London.
The need for any additional staff in the Department as a result of the new planning arrangements for London will be minimal, and will be more than offset by the huge savings in staff at present employed by the GLC.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how the content of the strategic guidance he proposes to issue to borough and district authorities for incorporation into their unitary plans in the event of the abolition of the Greater London council will differ from the provisions of a structure plan prepared under existing provisions.
It is too early to say. Any strategic guidance that my right hon. Friend issues will be the subject of consultation with the London boroughs and will be directed to helping them prepare their unitary plans which will replace the Greater London development plan.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list by name those who commented on the White Paper "Streamlining the Cities", Cmnd. 9063, with specific reference to minerals planning issues, distinguishing (a) those who believed that a single strategic mineral planning authority for London would be desirable after the abolition of the Greater London council and (b) those who thought that powers should be devolved to the London boroughs.
No. It is for those who have made comments to decide whether the content of these should be revealed.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment on what basis the members of the residuary bodies in the proposals for the abolition of the Greater London council will be selected.
My right hon. Friend will appoint members of the Greater London residuary body with the personal qualifications appropriate to discharging the responsibilities laid upon them.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he expects to announce the figure deemed to be the prescribed majority of the London boroughs, which would be required for his proposals for the collective funding of voluntary bodies to function, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished; and what factors he will take into account in fixing the level in the prescribed majority.
The consultation paper issued on 20 September set out the Government's proposal that the required majority should be a two-thirds majority of all the councils in an abolition area.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what default powers he intends to take to compel individual London boroughs to contribute to the cost of funding voluntary housing bodies following agreement by the prescribed majority of boroughs under the proposed statutory provision for collective funding, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
The Government intend to provide in legislation that once a grant has been agreed under the collective arrangements it will be mandatory on all boroughs to contribute the appropriate proportion.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will seek statutory powers to ensure that the statutory housing improvement areas declared by the Greater London council continue in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
No. It will be for individual borough councils to decide, in the light of local needs and priorities, whether such areas should be continued or terminated.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what will be the short-term net additional cost to the taxpayer of transferring responsibility for the Greater London council's statutory housing improvement areas to the London boroughs if the Greater London council is abolished.
None.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what representations he has received about his proposals for unitary plans in Greater London; and how many have been favourable to the Government's policy.
The proposals for unitary development plans were published in the "Revised Proposals Paper" on "The Reallocation of Planning Functions in the Greater London Council and Metropolitan County Council Areas". This was a response to consultation carried out last autumn and it did not invite further representations.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what discussions he has now held with boroughs over collective arrangements for the funding of vountary housing bodies in the event of the Greater London council being abolished; if he will list the boroughs which have participated; and if he intends to consult the Greater London council and the boroughs in membership of the Association of London Authorities over the proposed statutory provision for collective funding by boroughs.
We have held a number of discussions with the London Boroughs Association. A consultation document discussing the Government's proposals in relation to local authority support for the voluntary sector generally after abolition, including the proposed statutory provision for collective funding by boroughs, was sent to all London borough councils and the GLC on 20 September. A copy has been placed in the Library of the House.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he is now in a position to make a statement flout when he will announce the terms of reference of the proposed London Planning Commission; what is the time scale for it to prepare its advisory strategic guidance for London once it is established; and what are the staffing resources it will require to do this;(2) if he is now in a position to make a statement on when the London Planning Commission will be set up; and what will be its proposed membership from
(a) the private sector, (b) environment groups, (c) local authorities and (d) trades unions.
Decisions on these matters remain to be taken.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he is now in a position to make a statement on his consultations with representatives of the lords lieutenant concerning arrangements for support after the abolition of the Greater London council and the metropolitan county councils.
Discussions have been held with the lord lieutenants and I have no reason to suppose that problems will arise.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he is now in a position to make a statement on whether he will list the London borough councils counted as being in favour of the proposal and those counted as being against the proposal in table 4 (Housing) of part II of the report of the consultation on "Streamlining the Cities", Cmnd. 9063.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave on 13 June at column 493.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the voluntary bodies which have informed him that they are reassured by the letter from the London Borough's Association to the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State concerning collective funding of voluntary bodies by the London boroughs in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
We have received no comments from any of the 61 voluntary organisations which the London Boroughs Association has already decided to apply for grants under the proposed collective funding arrangements.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) when he expects to announce who would run the Greater London council seaside and country homes scheme in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;(2) which body would be responsible for monitoring the London-wide housing mobility scheme in the event of the Greater London council being abolished; and which body would approve the fixing of quotas to individual boroughs;(3) when he expects to announce which body would be responsible for running a London housing mobility scheme in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;(4) what administrative and financial benefits he anticipates will accrue from his proposal for housing mobility in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
An announcement about the detailed administrative arrangements will be made in due course.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what powers he intends to take to ensure that vacancies in the Greater London council's seaside and country homes are made available to elderly Londoners in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
We intend that the main abolition legislation should vest in the Secretary of State rights to nominate tenants to vacancies arising.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has consulted individually the district councils in whose areas lie the Greater London council's seaside and country homes, over the future of those dwellings in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
No. I have consulted the Association of District Councils.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will ensure that all the Greater London council's seaside and country homes remain available for letting and that lettings will be restricted to the elderly, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished;(2) what provision he intends to make regarding profits accruing from the sale of any of the Greater London council's seaside and country homes in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
As I said in my speech of 17 May at columns 621–22, we intend that the London boroughs collectively should have access to the lion's share of the lettings and that fair financial arrangements should be made reflecting the benefits obtained.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if the proposed London-wide housing mobility scheme will relate to ex-Greater London council stock or to all local authority stock in London in the event of the Greater London council being abolished; and if the proportions of vacancies will be the same as those due to be incorporated into the London area mobility scheme;(2) if the pool of lettings for the proposed London-wide housing mobility scheme will be a proportion of all new vacancies in that part of London's local authority housing stock chosen for inclusion in the scheme in the event of the Greater London council being abolished; and if there will be control over the quality of stock in the pool similar to that for the Greater London mobility scheme.
We intend that the main abolition legislation should confer on the Secretary of State nomination rights equivalent to those held by the GLC under the GLC Housing Transfer Orders 1980–83.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment who will be responsible for remedying major technical problems in housing transferred from the Greater London council to district councils outside London in the event of the Greater London councl being abolished.
The district councils to which the property belongs, with the benefit of the financial arrangements proposed at paragraph 2.6.3 of my Department's publication of 31 July on the transfer of functions.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished, he will ensure that authorities with town development schemes and districts in receipt of housing stock transferred from the Greater London council will incur no net additional cost as a result of the abolition of the Greater London council.
I refer the hon. Member to paragraphs 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 of my Department's publication of 31 July on the transfer of functions, a copy of which has been placed in the Library.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment to whom financial liability for defects in housing in town development schemes will pass after the London residuary body has been wound up, in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
As paragraph 2.27.4 of my right Friend's July paper makes clear, it will be for the Greater London residuary body to propose arrangements for the subsequent allocation of any town development scheme liabilities which it has not been able to discharge during its own period of operation; and for my right hon. Friend to make provision accordingly.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what is the number of civil servants in his Department he expects to be employed on work associated with processing expenditure incurred by the Greater London council and the metropolitan county councils under section 137 of the Local Government Act 1972 after May 1985;(2) how many civil servants in his Department are employed on work associated with processing financial transactions of over £100,000 arising from the Greater London council and the metropolitan county councils.
Sufficient to ensure that applications referred to the Department under the Local Government (Interim Provisions) Act 1984 are dealt with expeditiously.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the London boroughs which did not comment on particular housing issues in their response to "Streamlining the Cities" but indicated their general view of opposition to the proposal to abolish the Greater London council.
Barking, Brent and Hounslow.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how much staff time he anticipates the 11 London borough councils with mineral workings will need to devote to minerals planning issues if the Greater London council is abolished.
This cannot be quantified. The work load will depend on a number of factors including how many planning applications are made for mineral extraction in the future.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if a decision has yet been taken as to responsibility for the honouring of Greater London council warranties in respect of purchasers of ex-Greater London council dwellings in the event of the abolition of the council.
We intend that valid warranties issued to purchasers in respect of ex-GLC dwellings prior to today's date and the responsibility of the GLC on 31 March 1986 should thereafter become the responsibility of the Greater London residuary body. We shall consider in due course the position of any warranties issued or extended by the GLC from today.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if the proposed statutory provision for collective funding by the London boroughs of voluntary housing groups in the event of the Greater London council being abolished will include a forum at which such decisions will be taken.
It will be for the boroughs to decide on the working arrangements to be adopted, but the consultation papers of 20 September suggested that they might nominate a single authority or a joint committee to handle applications for grant.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he is yet able to make a statement on the management of mortgages after the abolition of the Greater London council and the metropolitan county councils.
My right hon. Friend has decided that the estimated 60,000 mortgages of residential property held by the GLC should be transferred to the residuary body which will manage the residual affairs of the GLC after its abolition.All the rights of borrowers under their mortgage deeds will be preserved. About half of the mortgages held by the GLC are on fixed interest rate terms. Those terms will be unaffected by the transfer. We will give directions to the residuary body as to its management of the transferred mortgages. In particular, it will be directed to charge rates of interest on variable rate loans on the same basis as now applies to local authority mortgages generally.Directions will also be given as to the treatment of those falling into mortgage arrears. The residuary body will be required to have regard to guidance based on the existing best practice of the major mortgage lenders, including local authorities.It will be the task of the residuary body to secure, so far as possible, the refinancing of the transferred mortgages with reputable private sector lenders. However, we recognise the legitimate concern of house owners as to who will take over their mortgage and the terms on which they do so, and no mortgage will be transferred unless the individual borrower has given his approval.I am confident that, with an imaginative approach by the residuary body, a large proportion of the outstanding loans can be refinanced on this basis. Borrowers will gain the advantage of easier access to further loans for home improvement or to move house. The capital receipts generated by the disposals will increase the resources available to the London boroughs.When the residuary body itself comes to be wound up, some mortgages are likely to remain in its stewardship. We have reached no firm view as to which public authority should become responsible for those mortgages. A final decision will be taken in the light of the number of mortgages then remaining.The metropolitan county councils are not housing authorities and the number of residential mortgages held by them is very much smaller. Comparable arrangements to those described above will be applied to such holdings, however.The arrangements we are proposing provide reassurance to borrowers from the GLC and MCCs that they need have no concern about their mortgage affairs as a result of the abolition of these authorities.
Newham (Land)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will take steps to require the London Docklands Development Corporation to make some of the land included within the compulsory purchase orders for Newham available to the London Borough of Newham for building for housing for rent.
No. However, it is the corporation's policy to make land available to local authorities, should they wish to purchase it for building for housing for rent, provided the local authority is able to match the corporation's planned development timescale for the site concerned. Such an offer has already been made to the London borough of Newham.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what consultations took place with the London borough of Newham and the Greater London council prior to the announcement of the London Docklands Development Corporation's intention to issue compulsory purchase orders for land in the docklands area of the London borough of Newham.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to him on 22 October 1984 at column 485.
Housing Development, Beckton
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what adjustments were made by the London Docklands Development Corporation to the market price of land sold to housebuilders in the first phase of the private housing development at Beckton.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Newham, North-West (Mr. Banks) concerning the temporary evacuation of one of LDDC's administrative offices.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) how many residents are now in occupation of new private housing in Beckton built on London Docklands Development Corporation-owned land; and how many of them were on the housing waiting list of the London borough of Newham;(2) how many residents now in occupation in new private housing in Beckton built on London Docklands Development Corporation land come from the waiting lists of London boroughs other than Newham;(3) how many residents occupying new private housing in Beckton built on London Docklands Development Corporation land were immediate previous tenants of the London borough of Newham.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Newham, North-West (Mr. Banks) on 8 June at column 319. LDDC is conducting a survey to establish which of the new owners were immediate previous tenants of the London borough of Newham. I shall ask the corporation to make the results of this survey available to the hon. Member in due course.
London (Strategic Housing Authority)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has recently received any reports from voluntary housing bodies arguing the case for a strategic housing authority for London; and if he will make a statement.
I have recently received a copy of such a report published by SHAC, the London Housing Aid Centre.
London Housing Authorities
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will give, at 1984–85 prices, the total capital resources available to London housing authorities from initial housing investment programme allocation and the prescribed proportion of housing capital receipts accruing in each year, for each of the years 1979–80 to 1983–84, inclusive; and if he will estimate the resources likely to be available in 1984–85.
The figures requested, at 1984–85 prices, are as follows:
| Initial housing investment programme allocation | Prescribed proportion of housing receipts | Total | |
| £ million | £ million | £ million | |
| 1979–80 | 1,361·9 | — | 1,361·9 |
| 1980–81 | 996·0 | — | 996·0 |
| 1981–82 | 646·6 | 159·2 | 805·8 |
| 1982–83 | 616·5 | 224·7 | 841·2 |
| 1983–84 | 562·3 | n/a | n/a |
| 1984–85 | 544·7 | n/a | n/a |
| £ million | |
| 1981–82 | 3·5 |
| 1982–83 | 88·7 |
| 1983–84 | 53·5 |
| 1984–85 | 15·1 |
Redundancies (Docklands)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many redundancies in total, including those not notified to the Department of Employment, occurred in the London Docklands Development Corporation area in 1982–83 and 1983–84.
LDDC has to rely on data provided by the Department of Employment concerning redundancies in Docklands. I am unable therefore to add to the answer which I gave to the hon. Member on 8 June at column 316.
Housing (Docklands)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what percentage of new housing that has been built or is currently being built on land acquired by the London Docklands Development Corporation is of timber frame construction;(2) how many tenders have been submitted for the development of each private housing site on land acquired by the London Docklands Development Corporation;(3) which housing developments on docklands have now received planning approval from the London Docklands Development Corporation for densities at or above 100 habitable rooms per acre; and how many housing units are included in these developments.
I will write to the hon. Member: the LDDC is unable to provide this information as one of its administrative offices has been temporarily evacuated.
Docklands (Dentists)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether the London Docklands Development Corporation has reviewed dental services in docklands; and what action the London Docklands Development Corporation proposes to take to improve these services and provide suitable accommodation for dentists.
The provision of dental services in docklands is not the responsibility of the LDDC. The corporation is however willing to consider giving financial assistance to projects which make a contribution to the regeneration of the area. The corporation provided £53,000 for the puhchase of dental equipment by the Tower Hamlets district health authority.
London Boroughs (Housing Stock)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what account was taken of the location of ex-Greater London council housing stock in the formula used to make housing investment programme allocations to individual London boroughs for 1984–85.
In most cases the GLC is responsible for capital expenditure on the repair and renovation of this stock, and this liability was taken into account in determining the allocation to that authority.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the latest estimate of the total cost of renovating to modern standards the housing stock which has already been transferred and which is to be transferred from the Greater London council to the London boroughs, from the beginning of the financial year 1983–84.
The latest formal estimate prepared by the Greater London council is some £1,070 million.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is his estimate of the additional number of staff that will have to be recruited by the London boroughs to enable them to continue the Greater London council's programme of renovation to the transferred housing stock in the event of the Greater London council being abolished.
My right hon. Friend will publish his estimates of the overall costs and savings associated with abolition with the explanatory and financial memorandum to the main abolition Bill.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many privately owned dwellings in London were recorded by local authorities in their housing investment programme forms as being in an unsatisfactory condition on 1 April 1983; and what proportion this represented of the total privately owned housing stock in London.
The total number of private sector dwellings in London recorded by local authorities in their HIP forms as being in an unsatisfactory condition on 1 April 1983 was 493,800, which represented 27·9 per cent. of total private sector dwellings in London.
Housing Expenditure (Renovation)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is his estimate of the proportion of local authority housing capital expenditure which was spent on the renovation of existing local authority stock in England in 1983–84; and what proportion of the general needs index used to make housing investment programme allocations was accounted for by poor quality local authority stock in 1984–85.
Local authorities' housing investment programme returns for 1984 show that 35 per cent. of their total capital expenditure in 1983–84 was on the improvement, conversion and repair of their own stock. The stock condition indicators which are used in the generalised needs index are based on the condition of all the housing stock not just that owned by local authorities. They accounted for 59 per cent. of the GNI total.
Glc (Mutual Exchange Bureau)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the authorities which have ceased to operate a housing exchange scheme due to their participation in the Greater London council's mutual exchange bureau.
This information is not held centrally.
South-East Regional Aggregates Working Party
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what mechanism is proposed to ensure that the south-east regional aggregates working party will assist London boroughs underlain with terrace deposits of sand and gravel to carry out their mineral planning responsibilities with due regard to wider issues including circular 21/82 and to liaise together where it is desirable for them to do so.
It will be for the London boroughs to decide how best to carry out their mineral planning responsibilities and to liaise together on wider issues. I am sure that the south-east regional aggregates working party will be glad to advise these boroughs, as it does other mineral planning authorities in the south-east.
Superstores And Hypermarkets
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what studies his Department has undertaken or commissioned, during the last five years, of the impact of large new stores located outside town centres, of the multiple impact of more than one superstore or hypermarket being located within the same shopping catchment area, and of out-of-centre discount retail warehouses; and when any such studies have been published or will be published and to which geographical areas they relate.
None. But a number of studies on the impact of individual shopping centres have been prepared by universities, local authorities, and other firms or bodies.
Housing Investment Programme (Allocations)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment which authority received the highest housing investment programme allocation in England for 1984–85 in money terms; and what was the amount of the allocation.
I shall answer this question shortly.
Council House Sales
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what studies of the effect of council house sales in London have been made by his Department; and what information he has of any such studies undertaken by other bodies.
I shall answer this question shortly.
Housing Stock (Renovation)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the five English local authorities with the highest level of capital expenditure on the renovation of local authority housing stock in 1983–84 from amongst those authorities from which he already has information, together with the amount of expenditure by each of the five authorities.
The information, as reported on local authorities' 1984 housing investment programme returns is set out below:
| £ million | |
| Greater London Council | 71·1 |
| Southwark | 36·7 |
| Birmingham | 31·7 |
| Liverpool | 30·2 |
| Islington | 29·0 |
Stockbridge Village Trust
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what steps he has taken to monitor the management and financial performance of the Stockbridge village trust; and when he expects to publish an assessment of its progress.
Stockbridge village trust is a company limited by guarantee and is run by a board of management. The board is responsible for the general and financial management of the trust whose first annual report and accounts was published in August this year. A copy of that report can be obtained from the trust. The Merseyside task force liaises closely with the trust and I and my colleagues are informed regularly of developments and progress, including all financial aspects of the trust's development programme. In addition, my Department is about to start a research and monitoring project into a number of aspects of the Stockbridge village initiative, including management and finance. This exercise is scheduled for completion in spring 1986 and my right hon. Friend will consider publication of a report at the appropriate time.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment from what public sources the Stockbridge village trust is funded; and how much has been paid to the trust so far.
Stockbridge village trust's contribution to the five year development programme—1983–84 to 1987–88—for the estate is supported in part by the urban programme through Knowsley borough council. An element of the works by the trust has also been eligible for derelict land grant. Since the trust was established in April 1983 urban programme support has been approved to costs of £2·464 million, and derelict land grant to the trust has been approved to costs of £55,635. This support stands alongside the trust's own resources generated through rents and sales.
English House Condition Survey (Repair Costs)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what method was used to assess repair costs in the English house condition survey of 1981; and which body was responsible for devising the methodology.
The method used is described on page 36 of housing survey report No. 12 published by my Department. It selected and adapted a methodology that was devised by the GLC for the 1979 Greater London house condition survey, carried out jointly with the Department.
London Docklands Development Corporation
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will introduce legislation to extend the Public Bodies (Admission to Meetings) Act to the London Docklands Development Corporation; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he will place in the Library the minutes of the London Docklands Corporation board meetings.
No.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he will release the 1984–85 corporate plan of the London Docklands Development Corporation.
It is up to the London Docklands Development Corporation to decide whether to publish its corporate plan. As I told the hon. Member on 17 September, whilst it had been LDDC's intention to publish the 1984–85 plan in July, the corporation decided it would make more sense to delay publication until the next update of the plan was available, looking ahead to 1985–86. The first volume of the updated version of the plan was published on 5 October. I understand that the second volume—the detailed operational plan—is expected to be published in a few weeks.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what steps the London Docklands Development Corporation has taken to ensure that revenue funding for health schemes initiated by the docklands joint committee continues to be available.
The London Docklands Development Corporation is not the statutory authority for the provision of health facilities in Docklands, although the corporation is willing to consider giving financial assistance to projects which make a contribution to the regeneration of the area. In accordance with the normal rule applying to urban programme expenditure, projects which need continued support once U.P. finance expires are expected to seek alternative sources of funding including, where appropriate, support under local authority main programmes. The LDDC is willing to consider cases which cannot be treated in this way on their merits, but it is not the corporation's policy to support particular projects merely because they have been supported in the past. Such a policy would make it impossible to accommodate new projects.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will arrange for the publication of reports produced by officers of the London Docklands Development Corporation that come before the London Docklands Development Corporation board;(2) if he will publish the dates of future London Docklands Development Corporation board meetings;(3) what are the dates of the next three meetings of the London Docklands Development Corporation board;(4) what are the dates of the next three meetings of the London Docklands Development Corporation housing and planning committees;(5) if he will make available to the public the minutes of London Docklands Development Corporation board meetings;(6) if he will make available to the public the agendas of the next three board meetings of the London Docklands Development Corporation.
No. These are matters for the London Docklands Development Corporation.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) whether the London Docklands Development Corporation has funded any capital expenditure or additional services in the new health centres in docklands; and what measures the London Docklands Development Corporation propose to implement to ensure that such health centres provide a full range of services;(2) what plans the London Docklands Development Corporation has for joint projects with district health authorities in docklands.
The LDDC has not directly funded any capital or additional services in the new health centres in docklands. It has, however, provided funds to a number of voluntary organisations over the past year including £19,796 for the pathway officer to the Society for the Mentally Handicapped, £18,746 to McMillan's Service for professional assistance to the terminally ill and assistance with minibus and transport costs to organisations including Helping the Homeless, Salvation Army, West Ham Central Mission and Charterhouse Mission.The corporation is discussing with the GLC, the London borough of Tower Hamlets and the Tower Hamlets district health authority the provision of a "core and cluster" project for mentally handicapped residents in Tower Hamlets. It is also assisting with the provision of general practitioners' rooms in a new housing development in Wapping, in conjunction with the Tower Hamlets district health authority.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what steps have been taken by the London Docklands Development Corporation to prevent the closure, or movement out of the area, of firms who make use of the river or dock facilities in the London Docklands Development Corporation area since the corporation was established;(2) how many companies that make use of the river Thames or dock facilities in the London Docklands Development Corporation area have ceased trading since the London Docklands Development Corporation was established;(3) how many firms that make use of the river or dock facilities in the London Docklands Development Corporation area have moved from the docklands area since the London Docklands Development Corporation was set up.
The LDDC has assisted four firms which make use of the river or dock facilities, under the Inner Urban Areas Act 1978, preserving 241 existing jobs and creating 53 new jobs at a total cost of £31,250. In addition, the corporation has invested in an improved river wall and lock facilities, and is discussing with new firms the use of the river and dock facilities. I understand that one firm—which began trading after the corporation was established—has since ceased trading, and that two firms have moved from the area—to Chatham and to Greenwich—since the corporation was established.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what sources of information are available to him in estimating the number of new jobs created in the London Docklands Development Corporation area since July 1981.
The estimates of numbers of new jobs created in the London Docklands Development Corporation area since July 1981 are derived by LDDC from regular telephone surveys of individual firms in the area undertaken by corporation staff.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what action the London Docklands Development Corporation took to prevent or reduce the number of redundancies in the London Docklands Development Corporation area in 1982–83 and 1983–84.
The corporation has set up a comprehensive business and information service for local employers which includes the provision of free advisory services to the local business community and the formation of a business club with the aim of improving business opportunities in the docklands area. Between July 1981 and March 1984, the corporation has offered assistance to local firms under the Inner Urban Area Act 1978 which is expected to result in the preservation of at least 570 existing jobs.The corporation has appointed three industrial liaison officers who are in daily contact with business communities throughout docklands.The corporation was closely involved earlier this year, though unsuccessfully, in seeking to prevent the loss of some 500 jobs at Crosse and Blackwell in Newham.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether in London Docklands Development Corporation is monitoring closures and job loss in existing firms in docklands; and whether the London Docklands Development Corporation has any estimates of job losses in the area since July 1981.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 8 June 1984, at column 316, for the years 1982–83 and 1983–84.In 1981–82 the corresponding figures are:
| Firm closures | |
| Number of firms | 5 |
| Jobs lost | 327 |
| Other redundancies | 524 |
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what were the occupations of those made redundant within the London Docklands Development Corporation area in 1982–83 and 1983–84.
The information requested is not available.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what plans the London Docklands Development Corporation is making to safeguard land for the provision of health and related community facilities;(2) what steps the London Docklands Development Corporation is taking to safeguard sites to meet the housing needs of the elderly, people with disabilities, the mentally ill and the mentally handicapped.
The London Docklands Development Corporation has allocated land for the community centres in Cyprus, Mid-Beckton and Surrey docks and schools in Wapping and Surrey docks in response to requests from the relevant authorities, and has allocated land for building by the Royal British Legion Housing Association in Rotherhithe, as well as the rehousing of a family with a disabled family member to new housing in Southwark.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what plans the London Docklands Development Corporation has for implementing the report which it commissioned on the needs of the elderly in docklands.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Bow and Poplar (Mr. Mikardo) on 12 June 1.984 at column 427.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what further reports the London Docklands Development Corporation is commissioning on health and welfare needs in docklands.
In September 1984, the LDDC commenced a joint survey of the Isle of Dogs communities with the assistance of local community groups. A similar survey is scheduled for the Southwark area this winter.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what trends the London Docklands Development Corporation has observed, from its monitoring of changes in land values in docklands.
Information supplied by the district valuer suggests that the average values of two samples of sites in the docklands boroughs—inside and outside the urban development area—in each case rose by about 5 per cent. between April 1983 and April 1984. It is likely that on certain sites, particularly in the enterprise zone, Land values will have risen more steeply although comparable figures are not available.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what plans the London Docklands Development Corporation has for the land covered by the proposed compulsory purchase order for the royal docks area in Newham;(2) whether it is the intention of the London Docklands Development Corporation to move out the majority of existing firms from the land included in the compulsory purchase order for the royal docks area of Newham;
(3) how many existing firms and jobs are located on the land covered by the proposed compulsory purchase order for the royal docks area in Newham.
I can add nothing to the reply I gave to the hon. Member for Newham, South (Mr. Spearing) on 22 October at column 485.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment on how many acres of land in London Docklands Development Corporation ownership development has been completed.
At the end of March 1984, 125 acres of land which had been in LDDC's ownership had been developed, as follows:
| Acres | |
| Housing | 59 |
| Services, environmental and community use | 56 |
| Industrial/commercial | 10 |
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many acres of land owned by the London Docklands Development Corporation have been acquired from the Central Electricity Generating Board.
None.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if the London Docklands Development Corporation will receive delegations at board meetings.
This is a matter for the LDDC.
Private Rental Housing (London)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what surveys have been carried out by his Department into the extent of Rent Act evasion or harassment in privately rented housing in London; and if he is aware of any such surveys being undertaken by other bodies.
The Department has undertaken no such surveys. There is a variety of sources of information about harassment and illegal evasion, but I am always ready to receive new evidence about them.
London (Housing Needs)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what assessments of London's housing requirements have been made by his Department since 1979, or are currently in preparation.
I refer the hon. Gentleman to my reply to the hon. Member for Battersea (Mr. Dubs) on 24 October, at column 685.
London Boroughs' Association
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what was the total of expenditure by the London Boroughs' Association in each of the financial years 1982–83 and 1983–84 on the funding of voluntary housing bodies; and how many housing bodies received funding from the London Boroughs' Association in each of those years;(2) how many applications were received in 1983–84 by the London Boroughs' Association from voluntary housing groups seeking funding; and how many were approved.
This is a matter for the London Boroughs Association.
Inner Urban Areas Act
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what sums were paid out in each London borough in each financial year since 1978–79 in respect of grants made under the Inner Urban Areas Act; and how many jobs were preserved or created by such grants in each borough in each financial year.
Returns supplied by London boroughs, the Greater London council, and the London Docklands Development Corporation on a calendar year basis for the United Kingdom's annual report to the European Community on the operation of the Inner Urban Areas Act 1978 indicate that expenditure under that Act in Greater London has been as follows:
| £ million | |
| 1978–80 | 4–558 |
| 1981 | 1·689 |
| 1982 | 2·126 |
| 1983 | *2·001 |
| £ million | |
| 1978–80 | 6,819 |
| 1981 | 4,000 |
| 1982 | 5,042 |
| 1983 | *3,111 |
| * One borough has not provided returns for 1983. | |
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what sums have been approved in grant-aid to firms under the Inner Urban Areas Act in each financial year since the creation of the London Docklands Development Corporation; and what proportion of those sums was paid out.
The information is as follows:
| Approved | Paid | |
| £ | £ | |
| 1981–82 | 158,170 | 123,200 |
| 1982–83 | 200,204 | 199,904 |
| 1983–84 | 383,179 | 207,680 |
| 1984–85 (to date) | 335,043 | 163,729 |
| Total (to date) | 1,076,796 | 694,513 |
Scotswood House
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if it is his intention to designate the Scotswood house under the provision of the Housing Defects Act 1984.
We have no evidence of defects in the Scotswood house—which uses a load-bearing timber frame clad with plywood—which would justify designation under section 1 of the Housing defects Act 1984. If my hon. Friend has any evidence which he would like to submit, my right hon. Friend will of course consider it.
International Garden Festival, Liverpool
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the future of the Liverpool International Garden Festival site.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer which I gave on 23 October to the hon. Member for Liverpool, Riverside (Mr. Parry) at columns 552–53.
Council Houses (Rents)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the average rent obtained for council-owned houses and flats in Stockton-on-Tees; what is the deficit or surplus on the Stockton council's housing revenue account; and how much is received in housing benefit.
Based on returns from the Stockton-on-Tees borough council, at April 1984 the average weekly rent per council dwelling was £13·90. The council made a rate fund contribution to its housing revenue account of £1,571 in 1983–84 and has estimated that there will be no rate fund contribution, nor will there be a HRA surplus, in 1984–85. As to main housing subsidy—housing benefit involves no income to the council—the authority had no entitlement in 1983–84 or 1984–85.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the average rent obtained for council-owned houses and flats in Liverpool; what is the deficit or surplus on the Liverpool housing revenue account; and how much is received in housing benefit.
Based on the last returns submitted by the Liverpool city council, at April 1984 the average weekly rent per council dwelling was estimated at £17·09. The council made a rate fund contribution to its housing revenue account of £8 million 1983–84 and has estimated a 1984–85 contribution of £5·6 million. As to main housing subsidy—housing benefit involves no income to the council—the authority has estimated its entitlement for 1983–84 at £1·7 million, and has claimed £5·2 million—subject to validation—in respect of 1984–85.
Development Land
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how much land, suitable for development, but for which there are no immediate plans for development, is held by local authorities, and other public sector bodies.
The registers of unused public land on sites of an acre or more include some 32,000 acres of local authority land and 16,000 acres of land owned by other public bodies which have been assessed as having potential for development. Other land held by public bodies may also be suitable for development but no information is available centrally.The information on the land registers for individual sites indicates plans for development where there are such plans, but the total acreage for which development is not planned cannot readily be ascertained.
Stansted Inquiry (Report)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he now expects to receive the report of the inspector who presided over the Stansted/T5 inquiries and to announce the Government's decision relating thereto.
My right hon. Friend and my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Transport expect to receive the inspector's report on the Stansted/T5 inquiries shortly and will announce their decisions as soon as possible.
Cantril Farm Estate
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how much was paid by the Stockbridge village trust for the Cantril farm estate.
The district valuer's valuation of £7·4 million.
Planning Decisions
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what are the reasons for collecting statistics of the planning decisions of the City of London and the 32 London boroughs; and what use is made of them.
These returns were introduced to meet the criticisms in the Dobry report that the Department was insufficiently informed as to the workings of the development control system. The figures are published to provide a broad picture of the operation of the system; those for individual local authorities provide useful yardsticks for them to judge the effectiveness of their own performance.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what percentage of the total number of planning applications in the Greater London area took longer than the statutory eight weeks before a decision was issued over the last year.
Fifty per cent. of planning applications in the Greater London area took longer than eight weeks before a decision was issued in 1983.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what percentage of the total number of planning applications in the Greater London area took longer than 13 weeks before a decision was issued over the last three years.
Twenty-one per cent. of planning applications in the Greater London area took longer than 13 weeks before a decision was issued in the period 1981 to 1983.
Royal Commission On Environmental Pollution (Report)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment, pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member for Leeds, North-West (Dr. Hampson) on 28 February, Official Report, column 150, whether he will respond to the 10th report of the Royal Commission on environmental pollution before the end of the Session.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Southwark and Bermondsey (Mr. Hughes) on 24 October.
Ordnance Survey
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish a table giving the number of employees in the Ordnance Survey at 1 April for the years 1970 to 1984.
The information requested is given in the following table:
| Date | Ordnance Survey manpower total |
| 1 April 1970 | 4,720 |
| 1 April 1971 | 4,672 |
| 1 April 1972 | 4,646 |
| 1 April 1973 | 4,671 |
| 1 April 1974 | 4,547 |
| 1 April 1975 | 4,577 |
| 1 April 1976 | 4,453 |
| 1 April 1977 | 4,183 |
| 1 April 1978 | 3,813 |
| 1 April 1979 | 3,630 |
| 1 April 1980 | 3,475 |
| 1 April 1981 | 3,371 |
| 1 April 1982 | 3,151 |
| 1 April 1983 | 2,970 |
| 1 April 1984 | 2,814 |
Parliamentary Questions
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will estimate the cost of answering all the parliamentary questions tabled for answer by him on Thursday 25 October.
One hundred and forty-six parliamentary questions tabled for my answer were answered today, including 127 tabled by the hon. Member for Newham, North-West (Mr. Banks). I estimate the cost of answering these 146 questions to be of the order of £2,700.
Uddens Heath, Ferndown
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the use of his emergency conservation powers in so far as they relate to Uddens Heath, Ferndown, Dorset; and what steps he intends to take to prevent further similar occurrences elsewhere.
The Nature Conservancy Council advised my Department on 19 October that Uddens Heath, which forms part of a proposed site of special scientific interest, was being bulldozed, and requested that a nature conservation order under section 29 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act be made to prevent any further damage. The site supports a number of rare localised plant species and a varied fauna including the sand lizard and the smooth snake, which are protected species. It was in my view essential to preserve the nature conservation interest of this important site, and an order prohibiting certain specified operations likely to harm such interest was made and came into effect on 22 October. My right hon. Friend will not hesitate to make similar orders to protect other threatened sites whenever he is satisfied such action is appropriate. I am, however, concerned about the vulnerability of such sites during the three-month loophole in section 28 of the Act, and I am currently considering how best to strengthen the protection afforded to existing and proposed SSSIs.
Home Improvement Grants
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what representations he has received about the home improvement grants programme; and if he will make a statement.
Home improvement grant programmes are run by individual local authorities, which decide how much to allocate for this purpose from within the total capital resources available to them. My Department has received representations from a variety of sources covering a range of issues, including the consequences of the call for voluntary restraint on capital expenditure in July and the future level of resources. No decisions have yet been taken about the level of resources for future years.
Demolished Dwellings
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what action he intends following the consultation with local authority associations in July about a proposed change in housing subsidy policy for demolished dwellings.
My right hon. Friend is prepared to consider applications from local authorities for special determinations to allow housing subsidy to be paid towards loan charges on buildings which are demolished. In considering applications he will have in mind the circumstances in which demolition is proposed and will wish to be satisfied that the alternatives, including disposal to the private sector, have been examined fully. The continuation of subsidy towards loan charges will help those authorities, for example, which have defective dwellings which cannot be repaired economically. My Department will be writing to local authorities about the arrangements for applying for special determinations.
Rateable Values
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) when he now expects to publish his consultation paper on revaluation of domestic rates;(2) what progress has been made on the revision of non-domestic rateable values; when he expects to be able to announce the next steps; and when he estimates that revised values will come into force.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Birmingham, Perry Barr (Mr. Rooker) on 22 October at column 491.
"The Rates Act: Protecting The Ratepayer"
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many copies of the leaflet entitled "The Rates Act: Protecting the Ratepayer" were printed; and what was the cost of production and distribution.
More than 4 million leaflets were printed and arrangements made to deliver them to all households in areas covered by authorities selected for rate limitation. The cost of production of the leaflet was £42,140. The cost of distribution was £106,490.
Office Development
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if, pursuant to the reply, Official Report 5 July, column 261, regarding main use office permissions, he will explain why the data requested by the hon. Member for Newham, North-West could be assembled only at disproportionate cost; and if he will make a statement.
My Department does not maintain data on office permissions in the form requested.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what data he has available (a) on the current status of main use office developments of over 10,000 sq ft in central London for which planning permission was granted over the period 1971 to 1983 and (b) of other permissions granted in the period for the purpose of (i) considering appeals and (ii) considering local plans; if he is satisfied with the quality and quantity of the available information; and if he will make a statement.
The Department produces detailed information on levels of office floor space stock, for each region, county and local authority, in commercial and industrial floor space statistics published annually. The latest edition gives information to 1 April 1983, and statistics are given by size band, and reasons for changes in stock levels.Information on the future office supply and availability and take up of office premises is published regularly by a number of leading firms of surveyors and market analysts. The supply of, and demand for, offices is essentially a matter to be determined by the market, which is best equipped to monitor major over and under supplies of office space.My Department is actively considering the need for research into development policy, including the question of office permissions and supply and demand in London and elsewhere.
Social Services
Wheelchairs
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will set up a feasibility study into the demand for an outdoor powered wheelchair that can be operated by the occupant, which is also lightweight and capable of being carried in a car boot.
The scope of the Department's wheelchair service is being considered by a working party that is reviewing the services provided by artificial limb and appliance centres. I am drawing its attention to the hon. Member's suggestion.
Binder Hamlyn Report
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now publish the Binder Hamlyn report on family practitioner services.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Holborn and St. Pancras (Mr. Dobson) on 23 October at column 574.
Nhs (Pay Settlements)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what has been the effect of National Health Service provision following his decision that health authorities had to find the extra £36 million to accommodate the pay settlement.
The Government have increased authorities' cash limits to cover 80 per cent. of the additional cost of the pay settlement. The remaining costs to health authorities in England should be met from savings produced by health authorities' own proposals for cost improvements through greater efficiency and better productivity, which amount to some £100 million at least.
Children (Long-Stay Hospitals)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many children under the age of 16 years have been admitted to long-stay hospitals in each regional health authority in the last 12 months.
On the assumption that the hon. Member is referring to admissions to mental handicap hospitals, the latest available information is given in the following table. This covers all mental handicap hospitals and NHS units. The figures include a considerable number of admissions for short periods for family relief, assessment and/or treatment.
| Admissions of Children Aged Under 16 to Mental Handicap Hospitals and Units in England in 1972 | |
| Regional Health Authority | Number |
| Northern | 1,000 |
| Yorkshire | 604 |
| Trent | 1,468 |
| East Anglian | 469 |
| N.W. Thames | 236 |
| N.E. Thames | 244 |
| S.E. Thames | 906 |
| S.W. Thames | 202 |
| Wessex | 1,059 |
| Oxford | 931 |
| South Western | 1,157 |
| West Midlands | 1,478 |
| Mersey | 68 |
| North Western | 432 |
| Total | 10,254 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many children under the age of 16 years who were previously resident in long-stay subnormality hospitals have been discharged in each regional health authority since 1980.
The available information is given in the table. This covers all mental handicap hospitals and NHS units as such hospitals and units are not classified by the length of time patients stay. The figures include discharges of children admitted for short periods as well as those who had been long-term residents.
| Discharges of children aged under 16 from mental handicap hospitals and units in England | |||
| Regional Health Authority | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 |
| Northern | 933 | 1,029 | 1,004 |
| Yorkshire | 411 | 502 | 585 |
| Trent | 1,198 | 1,419 | 1,462 |
| East Anglian | 533 | 463 | 459 |
| NW Thames | 232 | 189 | 237 |
| NE Thames | 330 | 271 | 235 |
| SE Thames | 649 | 850 | 902 |
| SW Thames | 242 | 193 | 205 |
| Wessex | 637 | 792 | 1,030 |
| Oxford | 687 | 814 | 904 |
Regional Health Authority
| 1980
| 1981
| 1982
|
| South Western | 667 | 929 | 1,136 |
| West Midlands | 1,011 | 1,149 | 1,450 |
| Mersey | 150 | 86 | 73 |
| North Western | 358 | 301 | 425 |
| Totals | 8,038 | 8,987 | 10,107 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) how many schemes have been approved under the pound-for-pound matching funds for voluntary organisations to establish projects for transferring mentally handicapped children out of long-stay hospitals: and how many children these involve;(2) if he will extend the pound-for-pound matching funds scheme for voluntary organisations to establish projects for transferring children out of long-stay hospitals.
Seven schemes have so far been approved which will eventually enable over 60 children to leave hospital. Funds are still available under the scheme and voluntary organisations are invited to submit further projects. There is therefore no need to extend the scheme at present.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how much additional funding has been made available for bringing children out of long-stay hospitals since the publication of the consultative document "Care in the Community" in 1981.
In addition to finance which health authorities may provide from within their normal allocations, a sum of £9 million has been made available over a period of three years to help health authorities get mentally handicapped children out of long-stay hospitals and a total of £1 million is available to voluntary organisations over a four year period for capital expenditure to match on a pound-for-pound basis funds they raise for the same purpose. In addition, some £100 million joint finance has been made available in 1984–85 to develop community based services in general.
Multiple Sclerosis
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for nutritional advice; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement.
Details of dietetic advice facilities for multiple sclerosis sufferers are not held centrally, but such advice forms part of the general services available from health authorities' dietetics departments.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for hyperbaric oxygen therapy; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to his question on 10 April at column 203–4 about facilities for hyperbaric oxygen therapy. We will be reviewing our position on the provision of this therapy within the NHS in the light of the results of the controlled clinical trials being supported by voluntary bodies and of any other relevant developments.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for telephone counselling by trained counsellors who have personal experience of the disease; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement;(2) what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for group therapy; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement.
Information on the local provision of specialist services to multiple sclerosis sufferers is not held centrally. The development of such services is a matter for local decision.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what specialist facilities are available to people with multiple sclerosis for neuro physiotherapy; where they are situated; what action he is taking to develop such facilities; and if he will make a statement.
There are facilities for physiotherapy in every health district and the great majority of health districts employs at least one physiotherapist with special skills in the treatment of neurological problems. The development of these facilities is a matter for health authorities.
Family Income Supplement
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is his estimate of the loss accruing to those on full rate of family income supplement with (a) no children, (b) one, (c) two and (d) three or more children by applying or renewing an application for family income supplement (i) one week before 27 November, (ii) two weeks, (iii) three weeks, (iv) four weeks and (v) five weeks and those being paid for most of the next year after 27 November at the old rates; whether he would advise such people to delay their applications until 27 November; and what is his estimate of the total saving from continuing those cases which come up to 27 November at the old rates for the next year.
All families entitled to the maximum rate of family income supplement (FIS) would have received £1 a week extra, regardless of the number of children they have (although FIS recipients must have at least one dependent child), if existing awards at 27 November were to be increased to take account of the new prescribed levels.Families who have a renewal award commencing one week before 27 November will receive the full benefit of the new levels, under special arrangements. Those whose renewal awards are due to commence either two or three weeks before 27 November will have again under special arrangements, the option of a continuation award at the old levels or a 52-week award from 27 November at the new levels. All these families are receiving an individual letter explaining the choice. Those renewing an award four weeks or more before 27 November will receive £1 a week less than they would have done for the period of their award still to run after 27 November; a total of £48 if renewal was four weeks before, £47 if renewal was five weeks before and so on.It is estimated that the savings resulting from not applying the new levels to all awards commencing in November this year would be about £500,000 but the savings from those cases receiving the maximum rate would be only a small proportion of this.As families' circumstances can change, it would not be appropriate to advise whether it would be in their interests to delay making a claim.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when he intends to write to all family income supplement recipients renewing their application before 27 November, setting out the advantages of delaying the application in order to draw family income supplement at the new rate after 27 November; how many people and how many weeks of renewals are involved in this; and if he will estimate the cost involved.
We have written to all 200,000 family income supplement recipients, only a proportion of which are due to renew their claims before 27 November, explaining the general effect of the change. The number of weeks each award has to run will vary. This, together with the fact that family circumstances may well change, makes it inappropriate to advise claimants whether or not to break the cycle of their awards. But we advise any family on request of the factors which may influence their decision.There will be transitional arrangements applying to some 10,000 recipients who it is estimated will be entitled to renewal awards from 6, 13 or 20 November. The effect of the special arrangements has been fully and individually explained to all those who may be affected. Those successfully renewing their claims from either 6 or 13 November will be given details of the amounts payable under the old and new rates, and of any break involved. Those entitled to renewal awards from 20 November will receive the full benefit of the new rates from 27 November.The administrative costs of this work are expected to be small.
Benefits (Scale Margin)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) how many representations he has received objecting to his intention to double the average scale margin applied to certain social security benefits; and if he will make a statement;(2) how many representations he has received objecting to his intention to apply the average scale margin to heating allowances; if he will reconsider his decision; and if he will make a statement.
We have received about 260 letters, including about 220 from hon. and right hon. Members, about the changes we are making to the available scale margin in November. The majority of these representations does not not distinguish between the increase in the margin and its application to heating additions. We have no plans to reconsider the decision to apply the margin to heating additions. The reasons for the changes we are introducing were explained by my right hon. Friend in his statement to the House on 18 June at column 21. These changes formed only one part of the package announced by my right hon. Friend, the full effect of which was to increase expenditure on social security by some £1,600 million.
Supplementary Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what steps he is taking to give publicity to the Supplementary Benefits (Urgent Cases) Regulations 1981 as amended by S.I. 1981, No. 1529 and S.I. 1982, Nos. 907 and 914; and if he will make a statement.
Information about urgent needs payments is available in the "Supplementary Benefits Handbook". More detailed guidance is contained in the Department's published "S Manual" which is available for inspection at local offices and is also held by citizens advice bureaux and larger public libraries. Leaflets SB1 and SB2 which are generally available advise claimants to make a direct approach to the local office if money is needed urgently. In addition, the Department's freefone service, which is available countrywide (except for the London area) provides general advice and information on all social security benefits including the help which can be given by way of urgent needs payments.
Invalidity Pension
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what steps he has taken to inform disabled people of their right to claim either non-contributory invalidity pension or the housewives' non-contributory invalidity pension prior to the introduction of the severe disablement allowance; and if he will make a statement.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to him on 23 October at column 570–71.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many disabled people have applied for (a) the non-contributory invalidity pension, and (b) the housewives' non-contributory invalidity pension since 1 January; and how many were successful in their claim.
I regret that information is not available in the form requested. However, some 14,000 new and renewal claims for housewives' non-contributory invalidity pension were received in the period up to the end of September and the number of awards was 10,500. During the same period some 12,000 claims for non-contributory invalidity pension were received. No details are available of the number of awards, but a large proportion of claims are likely to be successful.These figures are in addition to those of the claims arriving out of our special exercise for people currently on supplementary benefit, on which I answered a question from the hon. Member on 23 October at column
570–71.
Severe Disablement Allowance
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services why his Department's advertisement drawing attention to the new severe disablement allowance made no reference to the requirement that a recipient would need to be 80 per cent. disabled.
The purpose of the advertisement was to draw attention to the fact that the new benefit is being introduced, and to encourage all potential claimants to send for the appropriate leaflet and claim form. The leaflet explains the benefit requirements in full.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how mentally handicapped persons are to be assessed for the severe disablement allowance; and if he will make a statement.
Most mental handicap is present from birth or the early development years, and people so affected can normally expect to qualify for severe disablement allowance before the age of 20 on a test of incapacity for work alone. Those who first become incapable later in life will normally fall to have their level of disablement assessed in accordance with criteria similar to those already used in the industrial injuries and war pensions schemes. The assessment will be made not only in relation to such conditions as are prescribed in regulations but also by comparison with a normal healthy person of the same age and sex.The adjudicating medical authorities will aim to build up a complete picture of the condition, based on statements provided by the claimant and those who care for him and, where necessary, information from other sources, including doctors' reports and hospital case-notes.
Attendance And Mobility Allowances
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many claims there have been since 1 January for (a) attendance allowance and (b) mobility allowance; and how many were granted in each case.
The requested information at the latest dates for which it is available is as follows:
Industrial Injuries Compensation
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people were awarded industrial injuries compensation during each of the years 1979 to 1983; and how many were 80 per cent. or more disabled.
Figures for 1983 are not yet available. Information for the years 1979–1982 is as follows:
| 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | |
| Number of people awarded disablement benefit* | 85,440 | 74,620 | 64,770 | †62,560 |
| Number of people with disablement of 80 per cent, and over | n.a. | 250 | 210 | †190 |
| * Includes weekly pensions where assessments are 20 per cent, or over the lump-sum gratuities where assessments are 19 per cent, or less. | ||||
| † provisional. | ||||
| n.a. not available. | ||||
Health Authorities (Chairmen)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he will list all regional health authority members, regional health authority chairmen and district health authority chairmen, indicating whether or not they live or work in the area served by the health authority on which they serve;(2) if he will list the occupations of regional health authority chairmen, regional health authority members and district health authority chairmen.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Health Authorities (Ancillary Service Costs)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he will give for 1983–84 in total and for each health district and region the total expenditure on laundry and the expenditure on services provided by private laundry companies; and if, in each case, he will present the latter figure as a percentage of the former.(2) if he will give for 1983–84 in total and for each health district and region the total expenditure on catering and the expenditure on services provided by private catering companies; and if, in each case, he will present the latter figure as a percentage of the former;(3) if he will give for 1983–84 in total and for each health district and region the total expenditure on cleaning and the expenditure on services provided by private cleaning companies; and if, in each case, he will present the latter figure as a percentage of the former.
Figures derived from health authorities' annual accounts for 1983–84 will be available shortly, and I will write to the hon. Member.
Heating Allowances
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is his estimate of the savings arising from the deduction of the first £ sterling of heating allowances for supplementary benefit beneficiaries in the year after the start of the deduction.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given by my hon. Friend the Member for Brent, North (Dr. Boyson) to the hon. Member for Pontypridd (Mr. John) on 21 June at columns 241–43.
Coal Industry Dispute
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when, in view of the High Court ruling that the miners' strike in Yorkshire is unofficial, he proposes to pay to miners and their families the £15 per week benefit withheld because their union was deemed to have paid them strike pay.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Bolsover (Mr. Skinner) on 23 October at column 571.
Benefits (Uprating)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what would be the cost of uprating benefits on 19 November instead of 26 November.
The cost of advancing the uprating would be about £30 million for each week.
Urgent Cases Regulations
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what are the main conclusions of his Department's review of the Urgent Cases Regulations; and whether he will lodge a copy of the review report in the Library.
I will write to the hon. Member.
Social Security Advisory Committee (Recommendations)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list all the reports of the Social Security Advisory Committee and indicate all recommendations by the committeeommittee which have not been implemented by Her Majesty's Governent either in whole or in part.
As the hon. Member is aware, the Social Security Advisory Committee normally reports on most changes in social security regulations. Its reports, together with the Government's response to its recommendations, are published as Command Papers. A list of the titles and numbers of such papers published to date is as follows:In addition the committee has published two annual reports, containing wider observations on social security administration and policy, which the Government take into account in their own consideration of these matters.
Special Hospital
| Sex
| Age
| Section of the Mental Health Act 1983
| Date of Admission
| Offence (where appropriate)
|
| Rampton | F | 16 | 3 | 16 October 1984 | — |
| Moss Side | M | 16 | 3 | 18 May 1984 | — |
| M | 16 | 3 | 29 March 1984 | — | |
| M | 16 | 37/41 | 27 October 1983 | Arson, criminal damage, burglary | |
| M | 16 | 3 | 29 August 1980 | — | |
| M | 16 | 37/41 | 13 September 1983 | Rape | |
| M | 17 | 3 | 20 December 1983 | — | |
| M | 17 | 37/41 | 28 October 1983 | Manslaughter | |
| M | 17 | 37/41 | 22 October 1982 | GBH, sexual intercourse without consent, unlawful sexual intercourse |
Note: The titles given above are those of the reports as made to the Secretary of State. In some cases regulations were amalgamated under a different title when finally made and the Command paper title therefore differs slightly from the titles of the constituent reports.
Special Hospitals
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services why staff at the special hospitals are required to sign the Official Secrets Act; and whether there are any plans to change this.
Staff in the special hospitals are in the employment of the Crown. They are therefore required to sign the Official Secrets Act declaration in the same way as other Crown employees. This does not, however, inhibit informed discussion of the work of the special hospitals. Responsibility for authorising publications and lectures on the work of these hospitals has been delegated to the local managers who are encouraged by the Department to contribute to informed public discussion of the work which they undertake.There are no plans to change the present arrangements.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will give a breakdown of the number of juveniles in special hospitals by the hospital, sex, age, section under the Mental Health Act under which they were admitted and date of admission, where the juvenile was admitted following an appearance in court; and what was the offence of which the juvenile was convicted.
The information is as follows:
Special Hospital
| Sex
| Age
| Section of the Mental Health Act 1983
| Date of Admission
| Offence (where appropriate)
|
| Park Lane | M | 17 | 37 | 28 August 1984 | Burglary, ABH, possession of a firearm |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether there is any industrial action by trades unions which continues to impede the transfer of special hospital patients to National Health Service hospitals; how prevalent this problem is; and what steps are being taken to facilitate the transfer of special hospital patients.
We are not aware of any industrial action which is currently impeding the transfer of special hospital patients to NHS hospitals. On the general question of patient transfers, I would refer the hon. Member to my reply to him on 23 July at column 416–38.
Mr Michael Martin
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) how many patients from black and ethnic minority communities are detained in each special hospital;(2) if he is satisfied with the training received by staff at Broadmoor hospital into the physical handling of patients; and what steps he will be taking to remedy any deficiencies;(3) if he will take steps to prevent the administration in any circumstances of the emergency medication 500 mg sodium amytal and 200 mg sparine;(4) if he will make a statement about the death of Michael Martin on 6 July at Broadmoor hospital; whether his Department, as managers of the hospital, will be holding their own inquiry into the incident; and whether the findings will be made public;(5) what guidance is available for the management of disputes between patients or between patients and staff and which lead or are likely to lead to violence; and what charges, if any, are envisaged as a result of the death of Michael Martin on 6 July at Broadmoor hospital;(6) if he will explain in detail the arrangements at Broadmoor hospital under which nurses can prescribe and administer medication in emergencies, and, in particular indicate if there is a list of patients to whom such procedures can be applied;(7) on how many times urgent treatment under section 62 of the Mental Health Act 1983 has been administered at Broadmoor hospital since 30 September 1983;(8) what is his policy about the use of seclusion in special hospitals; if he will set out in detail what it is for each special hospital; and what amendments will be made in the light of the verdict of the Bracknell coroners' court in the inquest into the death of Michael Martin at Broadmoor hospital.
We are considering whether to hold an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the death of Mr. Michael Martin and what form the inquiry might most appropriately take, in the light of the inquest verdict. We shall announce our decision shortly. The purpose of any inquiry would be to help draw out whatever lessons are to be learned. It is likely that the findings of an inquiry would be made public. I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible to those of his questions which would not require prior consideration by any inquiry team.
Homeless Persons (Board And Lodging)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what was the total amount paid out by his Department in each of the years 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 to guest houses, hostels or hotels to provide board and lodging for the homeless;(2) what was the total amount paid out by his Department in each of the years 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982 and 1983 to guest houses, hostels and hotels to provide board and lodging for the homeless in the borough of Croydon.
Supplementary benefit payments in respect of board and lodging costs are, with rare exceptions, made to the individual claimant rather than to the establishments. I regret that separate records are not kept in respect of people who enter board and lodging accommodation because they are homeless.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will consider ensuring that his Department's grants payable for board and lodging in respect of homeless persons will in future be paid direct to the provider of that board and lodging rather than to the homeless person concerned.
I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given by my hon. Friend the Member for Brent, North (Dr. Boyson) to my hon. Friend the Member for Devon, North (Mr. Speller), on 13 July at column 254.
Secure Units (Research)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, of the research into interim and regional secure units that he is aware of, and particularly research sponsored by his Department, what are the general conclusions so far; and, in particular, if he will provide a breakdown of the figures of sources of admission to the units, namely from prison, special hospitals, local National Health Service hospitals or the community.
A research study of the functioning of the Lyndhurst interim secure unit at Knowle, Hampshire which was sponsored by the Department has recently been completed. That study related to an individual unit and its role in the range of provisions to be made within one NHS region. A more general study of the development of regional secure units also sponsored by the Department and covering seven NHS regions is currently in progress. No results are yet available from that study. The information requested in the final part of the question is not available centrally, although sources of referral are expected to feature in the general research study to which I have referred.
Residential Places
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will give the latest figures for the number of residential places provided by local authorities and by voluntary organisations which will accept mentally ill or mentally handicapped offenders.
It is not possible to give figures: we would expect those responsible for hostels etc. which care for mentally ill or mentally handicapped people to decide about the admission of a former offender on the merits of the individual case.
Nhs (Privatisation)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will meet a deputation of Merseyside hon. Members to discuss privatisation in the national health Service.
One of the Ministers responsible in our Department will be happy to meet such a deputation. We await details of the hon. Member's proposals for a meeting.
Housing Benefits
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what action he is taking to preserve the real value of housing benefits; and if he will make a statement.
Housing benefit is being uprated in line with the usual arrangements next month. The needs allowances will go up 4·8 per cent., reflecting the increase in the long-term supplementary benefit householder scale rate and movements in certain housing costs.
Nhs (Genetic Services)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services at which three centres the Department is funding the project in the development of genetic services within the National Health Service referred to in the reply to recommendation 24 in the third report from the Social Services Committee, Cmnd. 9371; what is the expenditure involved; and when the programme will be completed.
The three carrying out the project being funded are:
- Department of Medical Genetics, St Manchester (Professor R. Harris)
- Institute of Child Health, University of London (Dr. M. E. Pembrey)
- University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff (Professor R. Harper)