Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 93: debated on Thursday 13 March 1986

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Thursday 13 March 1986

Transport

A46 Leicester Bypass

asked the Secretary of State for Transport when a public inquiry will be held into whether or not to proceed with the A46 Leicester western bypass.

GrantRate per cent.1985–86 £ millionPurposeBiddingHypothecation
Transport Supplementary Grant50160To support highways capital spending on roads of more than local importanceThrough Transport Policies and Programme submissionsBlock grant, not hypothecated to particular schemes
Transport Facilities Grant50*6To support new or improved public transport facilities costing over £5 millionBy specific submission containing financial and economic appraisalSpecific grant
Basic Service Grant30*l·5To support industrial estate access-roads in assisted areasBy specific submissionSpecific grant
* Forecast outturn.

A38 Ripley Bypass

asked the Secretary of State for Transport what information was available about the stability of the route chosen for the A38 Ripley bypass at the time of the public inquiry.

The Department was aware of the geological conditions which existed on the line of the Ripley bypass at the time of the public inquiry in 1972.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport how much the repairs to the recent slippage on the A38 Ripley bypass are likely to cost: and how long they are expected to take.

Temporary remedial measures are now being carried out to stabilise the cutting where the recent slippage has occurred. The northbound inside lane of A38 was closed on 5 March 1986 as a safety measure. The temporary repairs are expected to be completed by 26 March when two-lane traffic flow will be restored.I am awaiting a report from our agents, Derbyshire county council, on the permanent remedial works required. Preliminary estimates indicate a total cost, including temporary works, of around £100,000. The permanent measures will take approximately eight weeks and may be delayed until completion of carriageway strengthening works on A38. These are currently scheduled to be carried out between the middle of May and end of July.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he intends to hold a public inquiry into the recent slippage on the A38 Ripley bypass.

It is not considered necessary to hold a public inquiry into the recent slippage.

We hope to publish the draft line and side roads orders for the A46 Leicester western bypass towards the end of this year. If required, a public inquiry would be held about nine months later.

Local Authorities (Grants)

asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list all specific type grants paid by his Department to local authorities, showing the size of each grant, which were hypothecated to any individual service or services or where local authorities had to bid for specific grants.

The table shows the specific grants for which my Department is responsible.

Seat Belts

asked the Secretary of State for Transport what information he has on regulations relating to the wearing of seat belts or restraining harnesses by children aged under 14 years in(a) Europe and (b) the United States of America.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport (1) if he has any plans to seek to amend the age conditions governing the compulsory wearing of a seat belt in the front seat of a motor vehicle;(2) if he has any plans to seek to amend the age conditions governing the compulsory use by a child in the front seat of a motor vehicle of child restraining harnesses.

No. I do want to encourage motorists to fit and use child restraints in the rear of their cars. We shall shortly be launching national press advertising and a revision of the leaflet "Protect Your Child in the Car". I shall make the leaflet widely available.The safest place for young children to travel is in the rear seat of the car, wearing approved child restraints appropriate to their age.If restraints are not fitted in the rear, it is safer for children to wear an adult belt in the front with a booster cushion as necessary to ensure the belt fits.

Motor Vehicles (Children)

asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many children aged under 14 years were killed or seriously injured in a motor vehicle in the last three full years for which figures are available.

Child* motor vehicle occupants, killed or seriously injured, 1982–1984:

Great Britain
198219831984
Killed707674
Seriously injured1,3211,1421,295
* aged between 0 and 13, inclusive.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport what representations he has had suggesting the introduction of legislation concerning the restraining of children in the back of motor vehicles.

The regulations made in January will require the fitting of rear seat belts or child restraints to all new cars manufactured from this October. A small number of individuals and road safety organisations have suggested that we should also introduce legislation requiring the wearing of rear belts or restraints. Compulsory fitting will make it easier for parents to follow the safe course and use restraints in the back of the car. It is sensible and often easy to fit rear seat belts or child restraints to older cars.

Home Department

Water Cannon, Greenwich

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether the Metropolitan police have requested the removal of the two water cannon sited at the Riverway centre in Greenwich; what scientific tests are proposed on the use of these water cannon; and whether live animals will be used in these tests.

The Metropolitan police are working with the Home Office in evaluating the two prototype water cannon with the aim of establishing whether water cannon have a role to play in the policing of serious public disorder. In this connection, the two prototypes have been temporarily moved from Greenwich. There are no plans for tests involving live animals.

Metropolitan Police (Baton Rounds)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will publish the results of the Metropolitan police review of equipment and procedures for the firing of baton rounds.

The Commissioner's review is not yet complete. The principles governing the use of plastic baton rounds were set out most recently in the reply given to a question from the hon. Member for Liverpool, Riverside (Mr. Parry) on 25 November, at column 391.

Police Air Support

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he expects the review of policy air support to be completed; what are its terms of reference; which persons sit on the review body; in what capacities; and from whom they are taking evidence.

I understand that the safety aspects of police air support are under review by the Civil Aviation Authority with the assistance of officials of the Department and representatives of the police service. Detailed questions about the review should be addressed to the authority.

Court House, Basildon

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the provision of a new court house in Basildon.

There is nothing to add to the reply given to a question from my hon. Friend on 23 January, at column 268. Further action on the scheme still rests with Essex county council.

Beat Police Officers (County Durham)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will call for a report from the chief constable of Durham concerning the number of home beat police officers who are currently operating in County Durham; and if he will make a statement.

The term "home beat officer" is not used by Durham constabulary. I understand from the chief constable that there are currently 35 sergeants and 270 constables in his force whose responsibilities equate to those of home beat officers.

Independent Broadcasting Authority

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he last met the chairman of the Independent Broadcasting Authority.

My right hon. Friend the Home Secretary last met the chairman of the Independent Broadcasting Authority on 16 January.

Local Authorities (Grants)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list all specific type grants paid by his Department to local authorities, showing the size of each grant, which were hypothecated to any individual service or services, or where local authorities had to bid for specific grants.

Details of the Home Office specific grants are as follows, together with the amounts provided for England and Wales in Class IX, votes 6 and 7 of the Supply Estimates 1985–86 and the Supply Estimates 1985–86, Supplementary Estimates:

£ million
Police1,399·724
Magistrates' courts128·606
Probation129·539
Commonwealth immigrants (section 11 of the Local Government Act 1966)89·424
Civil Defence11·989
Grants under section 11 of the Local Government Act 1966 are paid towards the salaries of staff in a range of local authority services, following applications to the Home Office. The other grants are paid on the basis of expenditure on the services identified.

Cigarette Sales (Children)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many prosecutions were brought in during the years 1980 to 1984 against retailers under section 7 of the Children and Young Persons Act for selling cigarettes to children.

The information available to me, which may be incomplete, is published annually in "Criminal Statistics, England and Wales, Supplementary Tables, Volume 1" (table S1.1(A) of the issue for 1984 under offence classification 144 and corresponding tables for earlier years).

Smoking (Fire Accidents)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the total number of injuries and fatalities in fires caused by smoking for the most recent year for which figures are available.

The readily available information is of accidental fires, attended by local authority fire brigades, for which the source of ignition was reported as cigarettes, lighters, cigars or other similar smokers' materials, other than matches. In 1984 there were 262 fatal and 1,874 non-fatal casualties from such fires in the United Kingdom.

Sunday Trading

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what additional funds have been set aside contingently for local authorities during the financial year 1986–87 to provide such services as may be required for Sundays and weekends in the event that the Shops Bill [Lords] is passed;(2) what estimates have been supplied to him by local authorities of the additional costs likely to arise to them in providing municipal services if the Shops Bill

[Lords] is enacted; and what information he has as to the nature of additional services that will be required.

Consultations with local authority associations have shown that no reasonable estimates of any additional services or expenditure can be prepared until the extent of additional opening of shops can be assessed.The Auld committee concluded that any increase in the cost of public services would be trivial; subsequently, one association, the Association of County Councils, has suggested that something over £1 million could be required and another, the Association of District Councils, predicts no marked effect on the rate burden.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many representations the Government have received from hon. and right hon. Members writing on behalf of their constituents concerning the proposed legislation on Sunday trading.

Since the publication of the Shops Bill the Government has received 974 representations from right hon. and hon. Members concerning the proposed legislation on Sunday trading.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what have been the average fines for convictions for Sunday trading in each of the last three years.

The information readily available indicates only the number of persons fined within specified monetary limits. I shall write to the hon. Member when I have the information he seeks.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what information he has as to the costs to local authorities in each of the last three years arising from enforcement of the Shops Act.

I regret that I have no information on the costs to local authorities of enforcing the Shops Act.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what information he has on the current state of compliance with Sunday trading legislation; and if he will make a statement.

In 1984, the last year for which information is available, there were 743 convictions for illegal trading on a Sunday. It is clear, however, that this does not reflect the extent to which the law is being disregarded. The Auld committee concluded (Cmnd. 9376, paragraph 25) that the existing law was not generally enforced by local authorities and was being widely disregarded by shopkeepers all over the country.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what representations he has received from shops as to the anticipated changes in turnover and profit expected to arise from unrestricted Sunday trading and as to the likely additional costs to them, particularly wages costs.

Since the Shops Bill [Lords] was published the Govenment have received 44 representations from retailers about possible changes in turnover, profits and costs. Some expect increased turnover and profits, others fear increased costs.

Data Protection Act 1984

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many representations he has received from businesses about alleged difficulties in understanding the requirements of the Data Protection Act 1984; and whether he will take steps to simplify registration requirements.

Since the beginning of this year we have received six letters about alleged problems created by the Data Protection Act 1984. The Data Protection Registrar, who is responsible for the arrangements for registration under the Act, is keeping the procedures under review and will be looking to simplify the procedures if that proves possible from experience of the working of the Act.

Small Businesses (Fire Precautions)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what representations he has had from businesses, especially small businesses, in response to his consultation on the Fire Precautions Act 1971; and how these representations are being taken into account.

The Home Office has received responses from 19 business organisations (including three specifically representing small businesses) and from 13 companies, commenting on various aspects of the proposals made in the consultative document on the review of the Fire Precautions Act 1971. All the responses are being carefully considered and my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Scotland and I will be reporting the outcome of the consultative exercise in a further document to be published later in the spring.

Metropolitan Police

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what restrictions have been imposed upon working overtime of Metropolitan police officers in each year since 1979, what effect such restrictions have had upon the amount of crime being investigated or not investigated, categorised in the most convenient form; and what effect such restrictions have upon individual police officer's enquiries and upon policing as a whole.

[pursuant to his reply, 19 February 1986, c. 178]: It has been the policy of successive Commissioners of Police of the Metropolis that overtime should be authorised only when it is operationally necessary. In May 1985, as part of a package of planned expenditure reductions, the force's overtime budget for 1985–86 was reduced from £58 million to £49 million. It is not possible to quantify the effect which this measure has had on the investigation of crime or on policing as a whole in London. The strength of the Metropolitan police increased between 31 May and 31 January by 171 officers.

Education And Science

Foreign Language Teaching

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science how many students currently studying at colleges of education have a formal qualification in the Japanese or Chinese language.

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he has any proposals to seek to increase the awareness of teaching Japanese, Chinese and other Asian languages in primary and secondary schools.

The range of languages on offer in schools is an important issue and will be among those matters addressed in a forthcoming statement of policy on foreign languages in the school curriculum.

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science (1) how many pupils have qualified with an O-level or A-level GCE in Japanese or Chinese in each of the past 10 years;(2) how many pupils in 1985 entered the General Certificate of Educaion O-level and A-level examinations in Japanese or Chinese.

The information requested is not available centrally for school pupils. The table gives, for the most recent five years for which information is

GrantPurposeSize of Grant in 1985–86 (£ million)How allocated
Education Support GrantTo support specific activities in the interest of education in England and Wales. The activities are specified in the Education Support Grant Regulations.27·5LEAs are invited by Departmental circular to bid for grant support.

available, the numbers of graded results in Chinese and Japanese at GCE O and A-level achieved by all candidates entered for home examinations set by the English examination boards. The table also shows the numbers of entries for those examinations for the latest available year.

GCE O-level and A-level graded results in Chinese and Japanese Summer examinations

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

O-LEVEL

Chinese (Modern)

higher graded results*1,5971,2781,0491,1451,236
all graded results†1,7961,3881,1721,2681,362
entries1,381

Chinese (Classical)

higher graded results4947158
all graded results4948177
entries178

Japanese (Modern)

higher graded results8482121138103
all graded results8484129144104
entries106
A-LEVEL

Chinese (Modern)

graded results ‡162185178144184
entries196

Chinese (Classical)

graded results32
entries2

Japanese (Modern)

graded results4168707891
entries94

Source: Survey of Examining Boards in England.

Notes:

* higher graded results are defined as O-level grades A-C.

† graded results are defined as O-level grades A-E.

‡ graded results are defined as A-level grades A-E.

Local Authorities (Grants)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list all specific type grants paid by his Department to local authorities, showing the size of each grant, which were hypothecated to any individual service or services, or where local authorities had to bid for specific grants.

The Department is responsible for two specific grants: education support grants and the in-service teacher training grant; and for the grant paid on the mandatory awards to students. All these can only be paid to local education authorities and are hypothecated to specific activities. The other information is as follows:

Grant

Purpose

Size of Grant in 1985–86 (£ million)

How allocated

In-service Teacher Training GrantTo encourage the release of teachers for in-service training in the priority areas specified in the Education (Grants for Teacher Training) Regulations.17·5LEAs are notified of the sums up to which they may claim grant in respect of the specified areas of training.
Mandatory Student AwardTo support LEAs in providing for the maintenance and tuition fees of students in higher education, where LEAs have a statutory duty to pay grant, as laid down in the Education (Mandatory Awards) Regulations.640Grant is paid at a 90 per cent. rate on actual expenditure incurred.

Medical Research Council

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science, pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member for Eccles on 20 February, Official Report, column 286, about the composition of Medical Research Council boards, when a reply from the Medical Research Council can reasonably be expected; if he expects to receive a copy; and if he will make a statement.

I understand that the Medical Research Council replied to the hon. Member on 11 March. I have received a copy of the council's letter.

Hearing-Impaired Students

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will request the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals to provide him with information on the extent and nature of the provision that is made to meet the special needs of hearing-impaired students at the colleges and universities for which they are responsible.

Provision for the particular needs of hearing-impaired students has to be planned on an individual basis and the Government see this as the responsibility of the universities themselves. The Government would, however, encourage universities to consider carefully and sympathetically what provision they can make to ensure that well-qualified applicants with hearing impairment can benefit from a course of higher education.

Standards And Achievements

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will publish the reports of Her Majesty's inspectors who have visited other countries in order to compare standards and achievements of schools there with standards and achievements of schools in the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement.

Her Majesty's inspectors undertake a number of visits abroad each year, for a variety of purposes. None is concerned directly to compare standards and achievements in schools, although some do focus on aspects of provision and assessment which bear on these issues. They are often short, informal visits by one or two HMI which do not lead to full written reports. However, in June 1985 a group of Her Majesty's inspectors spent two weeks in the Federal Republic of Germany studying curriculum and examinations for 16 to 19-year-olds in ordinary schools and arrangements for the periodic assessment of pupils aged 10 to 19 throughout the school system. It is hoped that a report of that visit will be published later this year.

Local Education Authorities (Rates)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he has any plans to introduce legislation to require local education authorities to pay rates on maintained schools and other educational institutions; and if he will make a statement.

No. Local education authorities already pay rates on the schools and other educational institutions which they maintain.

Teachers (Salaries)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what is a teacher's salary at scale one, at the new rates recently negotiated, expressed per hour and per day, of actual attendance at school.

The following table shows the salary of teachers at scale 1 (points 0, 6 and 13) at 31 March 1986, expressed per annum, per hour and per day.The length of the school year or day is not strictly prescribed, nor is detailed information on practice collected by the Department. Maintained schools are, however, required to open for a minimum of 190 days a year. For illustrative purposes, this has been taken as the number of days worked. The length of the timetabled school week is also not prescribed. A typical primary timetable might involve 25 hours per week, excluding midday and other breaks and after-school activities. A typical secondary timetable on the same basis would be about 27 hours. For the purposes of this table an average of 26 hours per week has been taken. It must be stressed that these figures represent a minimum assumption.

Scale 1 Teachers salaries at 31 March 1986
Rates per annum £Rates per day [annual salary ob/ 190] £Rates per hour [(daily salary X 5) ob/ 26] £
Minimum point 05,90431·075·98
Point 6 (graduate new entrants)7,30538·457·39
Maximum point 139,28548·879·40

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will publish a table showing the level of teachers' salaries at each scale in June 1983, and what they will be when the recent increases are implemented; and if he will show the proportionate increases at such scale, allowing for the increase in the cost of living.

The following table sets out the level of teachers' salaries in April 1983 (there was no change between April and June of 1983) and April 1986. The information is provided for the minimum and maximum point on each of the teachers' scales and for selected groups of deputy headteachers and headteachers. The increase in all cases—allowing for minor rounding—is 14 per cent. This figure should be compared with an increase in the retail prices index of 12·45 per cent. from April 1983 to April 1985 (not April 1986 as there has not yet been a pay settlement for the year beginning April 1986). The real increase in teachers' pay at all levels over the period concerned is thus 1·55 per cent.

Teachers' salary rates at 1 April 1983 and 31 March 1986
1 April 198331 March 1986
Minimum £Maximum £Minimum £Maximum £
Scale 15,1788,1425,9049,285
Scale 25,9499,1326,78310,413
Scale 37,35910,4978,39111,970
Scale 48,75411,7639,98413,413
Senior teacher9,43512,74410,75814,532
Deputy head groups 1–36,4779,2797,38610,581
Deputy head group 1414,62215,87916,67418,108
Head group 19,10810,13710,38611,559
Head group 1420,61021,82823,50224,891

Note:

Although the minimum—point 0—of scale 1 is quoted it should be noted that the majority of new entrant teachers begin on point 6 of scale 1. This group received £6,405 on 1 April 1983 and shall receive £7,305 from 31 March 1986.

Postgraduate Certificate Of Education (Physics)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science how many applicants there are for postgraduate certificates of education in physics (a) in the current year and (b) on average; how many of these are considered likely to proceed into teaching; and how many physicists left the teaching profession in 1985 other than through retirement.

The available information is as follows. Up to 26 February 1986 the Graduate Teacher Training Registry had received 272 applications for entry to postgraduate certificate in education courses in physics beginning in September 1986. Students still have some months in which to make applications for any courses which are not yet full. It is not possible to estimate how many of these applications will be accepted as this is a matter for the admitting institutions. At the same time last year, 367 applications had been received.In recent years some 80 per cent. of students who entered PGCE courses of all kinds completed their training successfully and entered teaching in the maintained sector; there is some evidence that wastage from physics courses may be higher than average.During the year ending 31 March 1984, 311 physics graduates aged under 60 gave up teaching in full-time posts in maintained nursery, primary and secondary schools in England. This includes teachers taking premature retirement. Figures for the year ending 31 March 1985 are expected to be available shortly.

Gcse Examination

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether it remains his intention that the general certificate of secondary education examinations should go ahead as planned; and if he will make a statement.

The GCSE will start this year as planned, so that the benefits of this important reform can be achieved as soon as possible.To ensure the successful start of the new examinations, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales and I have established a national programme of in-service training for teachers unprecedented in its scale and scope. That training is currently under way.In response to requests from local education authorities and many others for more help with the preparations and with resources, we have decided upon the following additional measures.First, I will be proposing to the local authority associations that, subject to the consent of Parliament, £20 million of expenditure in England be supported by education support grants in the first two to three years of GCSE courses in order to help secondary schools purchase necessary additional books and equipment. My right hon. Friend is making similar arrangements for Wales.Secondly, we will be making available a further £200,000 to the GCSE examining groups to enable them to mount additional training seminars for subject representatives from schools who failed to take advantage of seminars held since January—provided that the groups have reason to believe that those teachers will use this second opportunity.Thirdly, in view of the wholly exceptional nature of this large reform of the school examinations system, we will be bringing regulations before the House to enable local education authorities in England and Wales to close their schools to pupils for two days in the summer term in order to allow teaching staff to undertake more GCSE in-service training than would otherwise be possible.We are taking these measures in order to ensure that pupils starting GCSE courses this autumn gain maximum benefit from this new educational opportunity. We call upon all concerned to take advantage of these steps and to work together to make the GCSE the success it deserves to be.

Assisted Places Scheme

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science how much has been spent on the assisted places scheme in each local education authority in England in each year since the scheme was introduced.

[pursuant to his reply, 10 March 1986, c. 334]: The further information requested is as follows:

Total expenditure (£) (school year)
Local Education Authority1981–821982–83
Barking and DagenhamNilNil
Barnet18,34567,735

Total expenditure (£) (school year)

Local Education Authority

1981–82

1982–83

BexleyNilNil
BrentNilNil
Bromley50,805110,147
Croydon84,925188,756
Ealing38,07872,645
EnfieldNilNil
Haringey11,37326,989
Harrow30,17768,218
HaveringNilNil
Hillingdon4,58110,766
HounslowNilNil
Kingston-upon-Thames29,90567,956
Merton28,87174,336
NewhamNilNil
Redbridge33,58969,742
Richmond-upon-Thames59,762149,155
Sutton16,11831,098
Waltham Forest12,62270,835
Inner London Education Authority548,9791,233,290
Birmingham78,770170,052
Coventry35,15959,433
DudleyNilNil
SandwellNilNil
SolihullNilNil
WalsallNilNil
Wolverhampton50,258124,294
KnowsleyNilNil
Liverpool110,923239,869
St. HelensNilNil
Sefton88,109200,738
Wirral91,219253,149
Bolton61,074152,737
Bury42,98896,384
Manchester151,008347,348
Oldham48,765121,553
RochdaleNilNil
SalfordNilNil
Stockport58,24087,045
TamesideNilNil
Trafford16,70456,351
WiganNilNil
BarnsleyNilNil
DoncasterNilNil
RotherhamNilNil
Sheffield17,59637,275
Bradford35,18875,531
CalderdaleNilNil
Kirklees35,00373,279
Leeds81,613212,972
Wakefield49,94296,755
GatesheadNilNil
Newcastle-upon-Tyne131,692308,038
North TynesideNilNil
South TynesideNilNil
SunderlandNilNil
Avon258,109590,698
Bedfordshire94,027191,355
Berkshire40,29195,592
Buckinghamshire3,8717,300
Cambridgeshire42,561107,284
Cheshire69,297141,646
ClevelandNilNil
Cornwall39,07182,440
Cumbria48,261109,460
Derbyshire65,757133,904
Devon113,758230,225
Dorset40,74185,603
DurhamNilNil
East Sussex46,950121,915
Essex89,389181,486
Gloucestershire18,84942,615
Hampshire152,871491,727
Hereford and Worcester87,656204,057
Hertfordshire154,549367,393
Humberside50,281108,979

Total expenditure (£) (school year)

Local Education Authority

1981–82

1982–83

Isles of ScillyNilNil
Isle of WightNilNil
Kent56,284185,988
Lancashire136,972312,806
Leicestershire40,605101,137
Lincolnshire15,83443,912
Norfolk62,344136,285
North Yorkshire31,24346,406
Northamptonshire51,593125,403
NorthumberlandNilNil
Nottinghamshire32,50968,281
Oxfordshire83,324208,739
Shropshire18,58334,332
Somerset112,242267,005
Staffordshire91,398220,689
Suffolk86,197194,552
Surrey160,029389,468
Warwickshire43,714137,934
West SussexNilNil
Wiltshire14,94134,555

Prime Minister

Westland Plc

Q46.

asked the Prime Minister if any consideration was given to bringing into the public domain the letter of 7 January from the Solicitor-General to the then Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Henley, (Mr. Heseltine) immediately after a copy of the letter was received in her office; and if she will make a statement.

I have nothing to add to the account which I gave to the House in my statement on 23 January at columns 449–60, and in the debate on 27 January, at columns 651–58.

Northern Ireland

Q48.

asked the Prime Minister (1) if she will take steps to institute an Ulster Grand Committee; and if she will make a statement;(2) if she will take steps to seek to replace the current procedure for Northern Ireland legislation with a system based on primary legislation applicable throughout the United Kingdom or applicable only to Northern Ireland, as appropriate in the particular circumstances of each case; and if she will make a statement.

I made it clear on 25 February that I am willing to discuss with leaders of the Ulster Unionist party and the Democratic Unionist party the arrangements for handling Northern Ireland business at Westminster.

asked the Prime Minister if she will seek to arrange an early meeting of the Anglo-Irish Intergovernmental Conference to be attended by Defence Ministers to arrange staff talks aimed at concerted military action against terrorism on both sides of the border, including specifically co-ordination of military and police intelligence, arrangements for over-flying of the border by the Irish Air Corps, Royal Air Force and Army Air Corps and the pursuit of suspected terrorists across the border by the armed forces of the irish Republic and the United Kingdom, and co-ordination of maritime patrols for the interception of terrorists and their shipments in Irish Republic and United Kingdom territorial waters and on the high seas.

The Intergovernmental Conference has already discussed security co-operation and the co-ordination of security force activity on both sides of the border. In both jurisdictions it is the police who have primary responsibility for dealing with terrorism under the law. The Chief Constable and Garda Commissioner have been meeting about a programme of work to be undertaken by their respective police forces aimed at enhancing co-operation in a range of areas. I am satisfied this is the right way of taking forward our mutual interest in eradicating terrorism.

European Parliament (Members' Salaries)

asked the Prime Minister what information she has about the annual salary of Members of the European Parliament in each of the countries of the European Community, expressed in pounds sterling.

Information of this kind is not readily available because the salaries of Members of the European Parliament are determined and paid by their national Governments. The latest information, based on July 1985 figures, is as follows:

£
Belgium24,154
Denmark*14,089
France29,400
Germany25,368
Greece11,400
Ireland14,012
Italy30,630
Luxembourg16,500
Netherlands21,000
PortugalNot known
SpainNot known
United Kingdom†16,904
* Plus variable tax-free living expenses supplement of approximately £2,200.† Now £17,702, wef 1 January 1986.

Engagements

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 13 March.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 13 March.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 13 March.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 13 March.

This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in this House I shall be having further meetings later today.

Dr Anahita Ratebzad

asked the Prime Minister if Her Majesty's Government will grant permission to Dr. Anahita Ratebzad for a visit to the United Kingdom to publicise Afghanistan's peace proposals; and if she will make a statement.

We do not regard the Karmal regime as a legitimate regime. It would not, therefore, be appropriate for Dr. Anahita Ratebzad, as a senior member of that regime, to visit this country. If the Karmal regime were sincere about peace it would open the way to progress in the United Nations negotiations by agreeing to the withdrawal of the 118,000 Soviet troops currently occupying Afghanistan.

Employment

Devon And Cornwall (Ec Aid)

asked the Paymaster General if he will indicate for the years 1976 to 1985 the aid granted by the European Community under the European social fund for projects in Devon and Cornwall separately.

Allocation from the European social fund to vocational training and job creation schemes in Devon and Cornwall from 1983 to 1985 were as follows:

YearDevon £Conwall £
19837,00056,531
1984339,80458,106
1985654,53731,072
Fund assistance to training schemes run by the Manpower Services Commission on a national basis (including Devon and Cornwall) are not included in the above figures.Allocations from the fund were not analysed on a county basis before 1983.

Work Permits

asked the Paymaster General if he will introduce legislation imposing a requirement that companies obtaining work permits for the employment of foreign nationals should state what steps they will take to train a citizen of the United Kingdom to take over the job at the expiry of the work permit.

In many cases it is not practical to fix an expiry date, nor is it always reasonable to expect the employer to replace the overseas worker.

Labour Statistics

asked the Paymaster General if, further to his answer to the hon. Member for Ross, Cromarty and Skye of 10 March, he will publish in the Official Report all relevant recent analysis from the 1984 labour force survey into the numbers of unemployed people who had previously been self-employed and are thus excluded from the unemployed count; and if he will make a statement.

The labour force survey showed that in Great Britain in the spring of 1984 there were about 30,000 previously self-employed people without jobs and seeking work who were excluded from the unemployment count. However, there were also some 20,000 previously self-employed claimants included in the count who were not actively looking for work and a further 30,000 claimants who did some paid work in the reference week and said they were self-employed.

Bitter And Whisky (Prices)

asked the Paymaster General if he will list the average price used in compiling the retail prices index of (a) a pint of ordinary bitter, 1037 original gravity, and (b) of a standard measure, one-sixth of a gill, of a typical blended Scotch whisky in the years 1960, 1965, 1970, 1975, 1980 and 1985.

[pursuant to his reply, 12 March 1986, c. 476]: National average prices for beer and whisky are not used in the compilation of the retail prices index. Average prices are compiled and published only for certain items of food.

Trade And Industry

Steel Industry (Ec Aid)

asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether the European Community Commission has reached a decision on further non-quota aid under the European regional development fund for areas in the United Kingdom affected by the decline of the steel industry.

Yes. The EC Commission has announced that in principle this further aid will be made available in respect of the counties of Clwyd and Gwent in Wales, Cleveland, Humberside (together with that part of the old travel-to-work area of Scunthorpe situated in the county of Lincolnshire), South Yorkshire (including all the old travel-to-work area of Sheffield) and the Scottish region of Strathclyde.The United Kingdom should receive about £7·5 million from the ERDF as a result of this decision. The aid will be available after the amendments required to the existing five-year programme under Council regulation (EEC) 216/1984, and the proposals for the division of aid between qualifying areas, have been drawn up by the Government and agreed with the Commission. In drawing up these proposals the Government intend to concentrate the aid available in respect of Humberside on Scunthorpe TTWA and that in respect of Strathclyde on the districts of Strathkelvin, Motherwell, Monklands and Hamilton.In accordance with the regulation the aid will be for the clearance of rundown areas, the conversion of disused industrial buildings, the modernisation of premises for small and medium-sized enterprises, and also for aid to small firms, including grants for consultancy, the establishment or development of common services, the promotion of innovation, and market research.

Council Of Industry Ministers

asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement on the outcome of the European Community Council of Industry Ministers on 3 March.

The Industry Council, at which I represented the United Kingdom, provided an opportunity for a preliminary exchange of views on the Community regime for state aids to shipbuilding which should apply after the fifth directive expires at the end of 1986. A further discussion will take place in the June Council.The Council also discussed the trade in steel between Spain and Portugal and the 10 other member states. Small increases in the limits to Spanish and Portuguese exports were agreed. I registered the United Kingdom's opposition to the increase in the Spanish limit, but the decision was taken on a majority vote.The Council made limited progress in agreeing the terms of the draft directive on the mutual acceptance of test data for the type approval of telecommunication terminal equipment and heard a progress report on the draft directive for legal protection against the copying of semiconductor chip designs. A regulation proposing a non-energy raw materials exploration loans scheme was also discussed but not agreed. I maintained our reserve on this proposal which has a low priority for the United Kingdom.

Multi-Fibre Arrangement

asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what information he collects, an the context of the multi-fibre arrangement, concerning the comparative average annual incomes for industrial workers in (a) Brazil, (b) Turkey, (c) India, (d) Pakistan, (e) Korea, (f) Hong Kong, (g) Taiwan and (h) the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement.

[pursuant to his reply, 12 March 1986, c. 491]: Data on the earnings of United Kingdom manual employees is published in Employment Gazette. The Government do not collect data on the incomes of workers in the other countries, although some information is available from the OECD's monthly publication "Main Economic Indicators".

Defence

Departmental Telephones

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has further to safeguard information communicated on his Department's telephones; and if he will make a statement on the present arrangements.

I have nothing to add to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for South Ribble (Mr. Atkins) on 28 February 1986, at column 709.

Heart Disease (Army Personnel)

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will institute a departmental inquiry into the rate of coronary heart disease among Army personnel and its correlation with the rate of cigarette smoking; and if he will make a statement.

During the last few years the rate of smoking among Army personnel has decreased steadily. It now approximates to the civilian rate. At the same time, possibly as a direct result, the rate of death from ischaernic heart disease amongst Army personnel has also decreased and is now lower than the rate in the comparable civilian population.The importance of achieving further reduction in smoking amongst Army personnel is fully appreciated. Considerable effort is made to reduce smoking, including films and discussions led by medical personnel during educational periods. Initiatives such as the national no smoking day are fully supported by the services.In the light of these considerations, an inquiry is not considered necessary.

Fulbeck Airfield

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if there are any restrictive covenants or any other user restrictions which limit the use to which Fulbeck airfield may be put by his Department or anybody acting with its authority.

Nuclear Submarines

asked the Secretary of State for Defence what obligations United Kingdom nuclear submarine commanders have to report immediately any leaks of radioactivity or accidents likely to endanger the public.

There are established procedures for the immediate reporting to the Ministry of Defence of all nuclear incidents or accidents likely to endanger the public involving Royal Navy nuclear submarines.

Scotland

Radioactive Milk (Holy Loch)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what recent information he has as to the levels of radioactivity in milk from cows in the areas adjacent to the Holy Loch.

The source of man-made radioactivity in milk produced around the Holy Loch is atmospheric fall-out which affects the whole of the United Kingdom. The concentrations in milk from the area are similar to those in other areas of the country of comparable rainfall.Measurements are made of milk produced at representative dairies throughout Scotland by the National Radiological Protection board as part of its programme of surveillance of environnmental radioactivity. The most recent published results are for 1983 and they are available in the report entitled "Environmental Radioactivity Surveillance Programme: Results for UK for 1983" (NRPB-R174). The main contributors to the radioactivity are strontium 90 and caesium 137 and the average concentrations during 1983 are shown in the following table:

Concentration, becquerels per litre
CountryStrontium 90Caesium 137
England0·070·05
Scotland0·100·07
Wales0·130·08
Northern Ireland0·100·10
I understand that the most recent results, which will be published in detail in due course, show that the concentrations of strontium 90 have not changed
Health boardRecurrent expenditure (net) £ millionOrdinary capital programme (net) £ millionTotal £ million
Argyll and Clyde104·1722·700106·872
Ayrshire and Arran75·4402·23077·670
Borders21·5760·61022·186
Dumfries and Galloway37·0450·93037·975

significantly since 1983 whilst those of caesium 137 have decreased. The levels remain of no concern radiologically and are equivalent in terms of dose of people to a tiny fraction of that due to naturally occurring background radiation.

Regular monitoring of the Holy Loch itself has continued on my behalf by the fisheries research laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. The most recent results are published in the report entitled "Radioactivity in Surface and Coastal Waters of the British Isles, 1984" (Aquatic Environment Monitoring Report No. 13, MAFF, Lowestoft, 1985) which is available in the Library. They confirm that the very small discharges of low level radioactive waste from the US base have no significant effect on the environment.

Greater Glasgow Health Board

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he has any plans to reduce (a) the amount of money available to and (b) the number of administrators working for the Greater Glasgow health board.

I have no such plans. I announced today a net revenue allocation to the Greater Glasgow health board for 1986–87 of £380·323 million, £21·083 million more than the corresponding figure for 1985–86. The staffing complement is a matter for the health board, and I understand that the board has a policy of no compulsory redundancies.

Agricultural Colleges

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on his policy towards the proposal that the three Scottish agricultural colleges should be combined within a unified structure, with particular reference to the financial arrangements if any one of the colleges were to remain outside the proposed new structure.

Health Boards

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what financial allocations he has made to health boards for 1986–87.

I have allocated £1,445 million to health boards to meet their gross recurrent expenditure commitments on hospitals and community health services in 1986–87, and a gross amount of £37 million for their ordinary capital programmes. After expected income is taken into account, the net cash limited allocations to individual health boards are as follows:

Health board

Recurrent expenditure (net) £ million

Ordinary capital programme (net) £ million

Total £ million

Fife70·7212·03072·751
Forth Valley67·6381·72069·358
Grampian129·1023·130132·232
Greater Glasgow380·3236·890387·213
Highland53·4081·30054·708
Lanarkshire118·0583·640121·698
Lothian232·0755·280237·355
Orkney3·9910·1304·121
Shetland4·7890·1604·949
Tayside134·2182·990137·208
Western Isles7·4400·2107·650
TOTAL*l,439·99633·9501,473·946

* Includes £13·5 million allocated for specific commitments.

In addition to these sums I shall be allocating a further £20 million to health boards specifically for the improvement and upgrading of the NHS estate.

Northern Ireland

Lands Tribunal (Member's Correspondence)

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland when the Lands Tribunal for Northern Ireland will be in a position to reply to the letter of 16 January from the right hon. Member for Strangford in which he requested that the order following the decision of the Lands Tribunal be forwarded to Mr. Robert James Magilton of 87 Mountain Road, Whitespots, Newtownards, Co. Down, with reference to the case LDV/4/1977.

Montefibre Plant, Coleraine

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what is the total of financial support given to the Montefibre plant in Coleraine by Government agencies during and since the takeover of that plant by the Montefibre Company.

The Government were not in a position, because of the European Community's control on state aid to the synthetic fibre industry, to provide selective financial assistance or standard capital grant in respect of the acquisition of the business or any capital expenditure since. The only financial support given to the plant relates to an extensive programme of research and development which was primarily designed to find new products for the Coleraine plant. The company had a total research and development budget of £2·265 million; the Industrial Development Board's contribution to this programme amounted to some £0·448 million. The company is now liable to repay these grants.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what was the total level of investment by the Montefibre Company in the Coleraine plant since it took over, excluding the purchase price and Government grants.

It is estimated that the company has invested £920,000 in fixed assets since the takeover of the Coleraine plant; in addition, the Industrial Development Board has verified over £1·07 million of research and development expenditure. Thus, total investment by the company, excluding the purchase price, is £1·99 million which includes some £0·448 million of research and development grants, which are now repayable.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement outlining fully what investigations the Department of Economic Development made into the profitability of the Montefibre plant in Coleraine.

From its examination of the audited accounts the Industrial Development Board is aware that, despite an increased turnover, the company lost £858,000 in 1985. The Industrial Development Board has also discussed the prospects for the future with the company both at local and headquarters level and is satisfied that the company has been unable to identify a way of reversing the loss-making trend.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement outlining fully what investigations the Department of Economic Development has made into alternative uses for the Montefibre site in Coleraine.

The Montefibre site is owned by the company. The Industrial Development Board in discussions with the company has offered to co-operate in an effort to ensure that the site is utilised in the most beneficial way for the community.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement outlining what assessment the Department of Economic Development has taken of the market for the fibres produced at Montefibre, Coleraine.

The Industrial Development Board has not made a separate assessment of the market for the fibres produced at Montefibre Coleraine. After discussion with the Montefibre management the Industrial Development Board considers that the company has taken into accord all the relevant factors in arriving at its decision.

Alcoholism

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement outlining how his Department's aim of building care in the community is to be pursued in relation to the treatment of alcoholism and funding for centres for advice, treatment, education and research on alcoholism.

The recently issued strategic planning guidelines drew the attention of health and social services boards to the need for a shift in emphasis and transfer of resources from hospital care towards the development of community alternatives. The need to change the balance of care applies to services for a wide range of problems including those caused by alcohol abuse. Boards have been asked to reflect this objective in the future planning of services.Substantial financial support is provided to three voluntary agencies working in the field of alcohol advice, treatment, education and research. The Department and boards will continue liaising with those bodies to ensure that such resources are being used efficiently and effectively.

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement on the future of the three alcohol advice centres in the western area administered by the Northlands centre in Derry.

The Department of Health and Social Services will continue to fund the centres for a further three-month period when the present temporary arrangement for support ends on 31 March. The limited extension of departmental funding will enable consideration to be given by the Western health and social services board and the Department to the arrangements which might be appropriate in providing financial assistance in the future to the Northlands centre.

Armagh Prison

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland whether he will give a monthly breakdown of the numbers of women prisoners in Armagh prison during 1985 and January 1986 falling into the following categories: (a) on remand, (b) attending remand hearings, (c) attending trials, (d) attending appeal hearings, (e) attending bail hearings, (f) on pre-release or compassionate home visits, (g) on interprison visits, (h) on visits to outside hospitals, (i) attending pre-release programmes, (j) attending police stations and (k) serving prison sentences.

Information is not easily available in the form requested. The same prisoners could fall into more than one of the categories specified in any one month, and could attend a number of remand, appeal or other hearings during the same period.

Tobacco Industry

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many persons were employed in the tobacco industry in Northern Ireland at the latest date for which figures are available.

I would refer the hon. Member to the reply that I gave him on 17 February 1986, at column 11.

Energy

Sellafield

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will indicate what proportion of the protective coating (a) above ground and (b) below ground of pond 5 at British Nuclear Fuels Ltd., Sellafield, is in steel; what proportion only in concrete; and if he will make a statement.

I am advised by BNFL that there are three main operations in pond 5, which are fuel receipt, fuel storage and fuel decanning. All these operations are carried out above ground level in concrete shielded structures. The structures for both fuel receipt and fuel decanning consist of enclosed concrete shielded rooms. These rooms are steel lined across the base and partially up the walls. The structure of storage facilities consist of water retaining concrete ponds in which the fuel is stored in enclosed steel boxes under water.

Plutonium

asked the Secretary of State for Energy whether any plutonium has been exported from the United Kingdom to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics since 1962.

British Gas Corporation

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if, when he next meets the chairman of the British Gas Corporation, he will raise with him the corporation's action in advising employees in the gas industry that they should not offer comment upon the subject of privatisation outside working hours; and if he will make a statement.

No. Employee relations are a matter for the British Gas Corporation.

asked the Secretary of State for Energy what is his estimate of the expenditure which will be incurred in promoting the sale of British Gas during the next financial year and in meeting the costs, fees and charges to which this sale will lead.

Estimates povision for expenditure on the sale of British Gas will be sought in the usual way. Main supply estimates for the Department's expenditure in 1986–87 will be published on 18 March.

asked the Secretary of State for Energy what information has been provided by his Department to foreign stock markets in regard to preparations for the privatisation of the British Gas Corporation.

Goldman Sachs, Wood Gundy, Nomura and Swiss Bank Corporation International have been appointed to advise on possible overseas sales of British Gas shares. Foreign stock markets have not yet been approached.

asked the Secretary of State for Energy what estimate he has now made of the receipts which will accrue from the planned sale of British Gas in each of the next three financial years.

I refer the hon. Member to the answer that I gave him on 16 January at column 634.

Sizewell Inquiry

asked the Secretary of State for Energy what is his latest estimate of the date when the report of the Sizewell inquiry will he submitted to him.

[pursuant to the reply, 19 November 1985, c. 101]: I now have the advice of the inspector on when he expects to deliver to me his report on the Sizewell B public inquiry.Sir Frank Layfield has recently reviewed progress to date and what remains to be done. The inquiry over which he presided was the longest ever planning inquiry in this country; it sat for 340 days and received as evidence some 5,000 documents. It dealt with an extremely complex set of issues and Sir Frank envisages that his report will contain over 100 chapters.The inspector has assured me that he has been provided with all the resources that were required for the work that had to be done up to now. He has discussed with the assessors arrangements that can now be made to assist him in the final stages of the work on the complex nuclear safety issues in particular. I will, of course, facilitate those arrangements so that the report can be completed as soon as possible.The inspector has told me that, on that basis, he now hopes to deliver his report to me in September. When I receive it, I intend to reach my decisions on the inspector's report as soon as I possibly can.Arrangements are already in hand for my Department to have available the resources that will be required for an urgent examination of the report.

Environment

Sports Sponsorship

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has about voluntary or statutory restrictions on sponsorship of sport by tobacco companies in other European Economic Community countries; and if he will make a statement.

I understand that sports sponsorship by the tobacco industry is controlled in the majority of member states of the Community, whether by law or by voluntary restrictions as in the United Kingdom. I have recently seen the Tobacco Products (Control of Advertising, Sponsorship and Sales Promotion) Regulations 1986 which come into force in Eire on 1 July 1986; I am seeking further detailed information on the practice in other member states. I shall write to my hon. Friend.

Cadmium (Research)

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list any research projects he is funding, has funded or intends to fund on the effects of cadmium on, and its occurrence in (a) agricultural livestock, (b) wildlife and (c) cereal crops.

My Department has funded a number of investigations of cadmium contamination at various sites. These investigations included measurements of cadmium levels in soil and vegetables. The most important investigations were at Shipham (Somerset), Beaumont Leys (Leicestershire), C1assington (Oxfordshire) and Royston (Hertfordshire). Investigations of the possible toxic effects on, and measurements of accumulations of cadmium in, agricultural livestock, wildlife and cereal crops were not included in these studies. No further work is planned.The main responsibility for the health of crops and of farm animals and for the quality of food lies with the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, which supports research relevant to this responsibility.

River Rother (Pollution)

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what are the concentrations and quantities of (a) tributyltin and (b) dieldrin released into the River Rother during pollution incidents in 1985; and if he will state the source of the pollution.

In October 1985 there was a leakage of tributyltin and dieldrin from a timber treatment tank into the Newmill Channel, a tributary of the River Rother. Prompt action by the Southern water authority contained the spillage, and none entered the River Rother until it had been diluted very considerably. No adverse effect was observed in the River Rother.

Anti-Fouling Paints

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the brand names and manufacturers of products banned from retail sale under legislation relating to the use of tributyltin anti-fouling paints for yachts and small boats.

The Control of Pollution (Anti-fouling Paint) Regulations 1985 set maximum levels of organotin compounds in anti-fouling paints which may be sold by retail. It follows that any anti-fouling paint which does not meet the criteria set out in the regulations is banned from retail sale. I understand that British manufacturers of antifouling paints have withdrawn the following brands since the intention to regulate was announced in July 1985:

Blakes Paints Ltd.— Tiger Anti-fouling
Hempels Marine Paints Ltd.— Hard Racing
International Paint plc— Micron Clear 25
In addition, I understand that other products have been reformulated to comply with the regulations. A list of paints which manufacturers and distributors have indicated comply with the regulations was given in my answer to the question from my hon. Friend the Member for South Hams (Mr. Steen) on 27 February 1986, at columns

673–75. This same list, together with a circular, has now been sent to all local authorities, as an aid in enforcing the regulations.

Land (Darlington)

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many acres of land are in public ownership in the borough of Darlington; and how many were so in March 1983.

Information about the amount of land in public ownership is not available centrally. The register of unused or underused publicly owned land for the borough of Darlington contains details of 559 acres of such land. Comparable information for March 1983 is not available, but in January 1983 the register for Darlington contained details of 728 acres of land.

Country Footpaths

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what discussions he is having with county councils to seek to open up more country footpaths; and if he will make a statement.

Local authorities are empowered to create new footpaths in the light of the needs of their area. The Department's circular 1/83 reminds county councils of their duties and responsibilities, including advice that obstructions on existing public rights of way should be removed promptly.In addition, the Countryside Commission grant-aids the improvement of footpaths. The recently announced farm and countryside initiative will also be considering the improvement of local footpaths.

Enterprise Agencies

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has on the estimated cost of each job created by each of the enterprise agencies established by the metropolitan county councils.

The metropolitan county councils and some other local authorities have established enterprise boards which they fund under discretionary powers. There is no statutory requirement to notify their actions and my Department does not maintain records of the cost of each job that an enterprise board may have helped to create.

Greater London Enterprise Board

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what estimate he has of the total rights and liabilities to be transferred to the residuary body arising from the activities of the Greater London enterprise board.

No liabilities in relation to the Greater London enterprise board will pass to the London Residuary Body.The London Residuary Body will have rights to receive payments in respect of mortgage loans made to the Greater London enterprise board by the Greater London council and, in the event of a winding up of the board, to receive the company's net assets.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many consents he has given under section 137 of the Local Government Act 1985 in respect of grants to the Greater London enterprise board; and for what sums.

My right hon. Friend has given five consents to the GLC under section 7 of the Local Government (Interim Provisions) Act 1984 to expenditure totalling £11·092 million by the GLC under section 137 of the Local Government Act 1972 in relation to the Greater London enterprise board. They are as follows:1.—27 FEBRUARY 1985£4·896 million—sufficient to:

  • (a) meet GLEB's staffing and overheads costs first quarter of 1985–86;
  • (b) allow GLEB to discharge all its 1985–86 section 137 contractual liabilities;
  • (c) provide for some continuation investment.
  • 2.— 5 JULY 1985

    £1·107 million maintenance funding for GLEB's existing company investments.

    3.—25 JULY 1985

    £0·964 million for GLEB's staffing and overheads for the second quarter of 1985–86.

    4.—14 OCTOBER 1985

    £2 million for the balance of GLEB's staffing and overheads costs in 1985–86.

    In addition, consent was given on 14 October 1985 for the GLC to provide continuation funding of £2·125 million for the five technology networks set up by GLEB. This funding will be via GLEB's subsidiary Technet Ltd.

    Consent to a further grant to GLEB for £8 million was refused on 12 March 1986.

    Radioactive Waste

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if, pursuant to his reply of 6 March, Official Report, column 271, he will list the annual quantity of authorised discharges of uranium and other radioactive materials for each of the sites referred to since 1980.

    Details of the amount of radioactive waste discharged from these sites are not held centrally. However, authorisations issued under the Radioactive Substances Act 1960 specify the amounts of radioactive waste which may be discharged and I am placing copies of the relevant authorisations in the Library of the House.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he expects the final report of his Department's study into the best practicable environmental options for the management of radioactive wastes to be made public.

    The report of the study carried out under my Department's direction, to establish the best practicable environmental options (BPEO) for the management of low and intermediate level radioactive wastes, is being made available today. Copies have been placed in the Library of the House.This report is an essential element in our proposals for increasing public understanding of and involvement in the development of our policies for managing radioactive wastes. The House of Commons Select Committee on the Environment, in its report published yesterday, laid great stress on the importance of a well-informed, open and public debate, and welcomed this study in that context.It demonstrates that for every type of waste several storage and disposal options are practicable and safe. All the main options for the disposal and storage of low-level and intermediate level wastes were examined. A range of assumptions about future growth in nuclear power and the level of reprocessing were considered.Costs and radiological impacts were calculated; since the BPEO is a matter of judgment of relative priorities options were evaluated using four different sets of weights. These reflect a range of views, from those who would wish to minimise costs to those who would wish to minimise risks, local impact, or the widespread dispersion of radioactivity in the environment.The other main conclusions of the report are that:

  • i. long-term storage is least attractive on economic and radiological grounds. It is attractive only if an ability to retrieve wastes easily is an overriding concern;
  • ii. on economic and radiological grounds an optimum strategy for storage and disposal would involve early use of all disposal options, including sea disposal;
  • iii. the BPEO for most low-level and some short-lived intermediate level waste is near-surface disposal, as soon as practicable, in appropriately designed trenches;
  • iv. no preference can be established between deep cavity disposal or off-shore borehole disposal for those intermediate level wastes with more alpha-emitting radionuclides than is acceptable for near-surface disposal or sea disposal;
  • v. the division, at the margin, between what is suitable for near-surface disposal in an engineered trench and deep disposal can only be explored in more detail when site-specific information is available;
  • vi. if future sea disposal operations are carried out this could be the preferred option for about 15 per cent. of the intermediate level waste expected to arise by 2030.
  • Local Government Reform

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what was the cost of the leaflets on the new structure of government in the metropolitan areas, published by his Department in March; how many have been printed so far; to whom they will be delivered; and what will be the cost of delivery.

    Seven million leaflets have been produced at a total cost of £74,454. I have no plans to have further copies printed. The leaflets are being distributed to all households and business premises in the Greater London and metropolitan county areas at a total cost, including VAT, of £158,504.

    Non-Domestic Rates

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish the total of non-domestic rates paid to local authorities in Great Britain in each year from 1974–75 to 1985–86 (a) gross and (b) net of all tax relief.

    Estimates of non-domestic rates are as follows:

    Non-domestic rate income—Great Britain
    £'000 million
    1974–751·7
    1975–762·2
    1976–772·4
    1977–782·7
    1978–793·5
    1979–804·0
    1980–815·1
    1981–826·2
    1982–837·0
    1983–847·4
    1984–857·9
    1985–868·5

    Note: The estimates are derived from total rate income allocated to the non-domestic sector on the basis of its rateable value share.

    Non-domestic rates are treated as a normal business expense and there is no separately identified tax relief on rates.

    Voluntary Organisations (Funds)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has any plans to allocated additional funds to approved voluntary organisations in cases where district councils have declined to make up the difference between their provisional allocations and their final allocations.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will take steps to restore the amount of transitional grant to voluntary organisations in Greater Manchester to the level provisionally allocated in November 1985.

    No. The final allocations were based on the detailed bids made by authorities in Greater Manchester. The provisional allocations issued last year were purely illustrative.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment why final funding falls short of 75 per cent. of operating budgets for voluntary organisations in Greater Manchester for 1986–87.

    Local authorities are expected to fund voluntary bodies out of their own resources, as supplemented by rate support grant. Transitional grant is temporary additional assistance directed at local, not countrywide, projects taken on by individual districts. Six of the 10 Greater Manchester authorities got allocations which fully matched their bids for eligible projects. Final funding of voluntary projects in Greater Manchester depends entirely on the decisions of local authorities.

    African Methodist Evangelical Church (Grant)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he will make a decision on the consent for a grant from the Greater Manchester council to the African Methodist Evangelical Church under the Local Government (Interim Provisions) Act 1984.

    Further information on this application is awaited from Greater Manchester council. A decision will be reached as quickly as possible after this has been received.

    Gateshead (Urban Renewal)

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he has reached a decision on proposals submitted to his urban housing renewal unit by Gateshead metropolitan borough council; and if he will make a statement.

    I am pleased to announce my right hon. Friend's favourable response to a proposal for a scheme in Gateshead which the metropolitan borough council has worked up in close consultation with my Department's urban housing renewal unit. We hope to reach agreement with the council on further schemes in due course.The estate which will benefit from today's decision is the Old Fold estate in Gateshead. The council has already introduced responsive locally-based management arrangements on the estate, and is seeking to deliver a comprehensive housing service and to involve the residents in day-to-day decisions which affect their lives. The proposal agreed with the unit will be a major further step in the process of improving the quality of life on this rundown estate.The Old Fold estate is a cottage estate of 492 dwellings built in the 1930s. The estate will benefit from a community refurbishment scheme, the aim of which is to enable unemployed people drawn mainly from the estate to work on improvements to the environment and communal areas. This scheme will provide up to 100 jobs, and will be funded by the Government's community programme, subject to the agreement of the Manpower Services Commission's area board, and my Department's urban programme. Resources of the order of £1,245,000 will be involved, including some £714,000 of urban programme funding, which I am pleased to approve in principle.I warmly welcome the development of this package, and the close co-operation between the council and my Department's regional office and the staff and consultants of the urban housing renewal unit, which has made it possible.

    Bonamy Estate, Southwark

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what are the results of the recent survey of demand for owner-occupation on the Bonamy estate, Southwark.

    The results show that over half (53 per cent.) of all tenants aged between 18 and 30 and over a third (38 per cent.) of those between 31 and 50 might try to buy a house or flat within the next 10 years, either privately or through the council. The results also show that if new houses were available this year at adjoining Bramcote Grove 31 Bonamy households would be prepared to buy. I have written to Councillor Ritchie, leader of Southwark council, expressing the hope that the new development can start soon. I have also offered to meet him.

    Chemical Leak, Belvedere

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has received any representations following the recent chemical leak at Belvedere.

    [pursuant to her reply, 7 March 1986, c. 287]: I have received one letter, which has been redirected to the Secretary of State for Employment, since the leak, which affected employees of the factory concerned. This is a matter for investigation by the Health and Safety Executive.

    Social Services

    Stanley Royd Hospital (Inquiry)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he has received the reports of the Wakefield health authority and the Yorkshire regional health authority on points raised by the Stanley Royd inquiry; whether they are to be published; and if he will make a statement.

    I have received a letter from the chairman of the Yorkshire regional health authority enclosing both reports. The authorities are publishing their reports and the letter today. I have placed copies in the Library.The district's report records a wide range of changes designed to achieve the highest possible catering and hygiene standards in the kitchens at Stanley Royd and elsewhere in the district. They include the production of comprehensive written instructions relating to all aspects of catering and good hygiene practice throughout the district; regular training; frequent unannounced inspections by supervisors and managers; the introduction of quality control procedures; and the appointment of a district catering manager with full responsibility and authority for catering services. The Stanley Royd kitchen staffing level and bonus scheme are being reviewed as recommended in the report. A replacement kitchen is being built at Stanley Royd and is due to be completed early next year. Substantial interim improvements to the kitchen structure and equipment have been made.The RHA has instituted the quarterly review of capital schemes recommended by the inquiry and has made other changes designed to improve its capital planning. It has also appointed a regional catering hygiene adviser from 7 April to be responsible for ensuring high standards throughout the region. Each of the districts in the region has responded to a request from the regional health authority that it considers the inquiry report's recommendations and a summary of what went wrong at Stanley Royd. The RHA will follow up these responses.I am pleased to note that the ratio of nurses to patients at Stanley Royd has improved considerably since September 1984 and that further improvements are being sought. The district's report reiterates that problems of recruitment rather than finance are the source of difficulty. On finance, the RHA's response confirms that it is to review its policy for the withdrawal of funds from institutions as patient numbers fall.The responses record that the authorities decided that eight individuals should be the subject of disciplinary investigation. Subsequently, it has been decided that no further action should be taken in the case of one of these individuals while another has been dismissed as a result of disciplinary proceedings which were already in train.The inquiry report showed that the basic cause of the outbreak was a failure in management. As the chairman of the RHA said in his letter,

    "there can be no doubt that the root cause of that failure lay in the defective system of management, common throughout the health service, in which accountability and the roles of both officers and authorities was unclear".

    The reports show that both authorities are making substantial changes to their management arrangements. In the case of the regional health authority the changes extend to the nature of its relationship with districts and to the development of a monitoring policy, though it is clear that much more work remains to be done on the details of monitoring. I welcome the broad thrust of the changes being made.

    In the short time since the publication of the inquiry report on 21 January it would not have have been practicable for the two authorities to complete all relevant action. However, their reports show that substantial progress on a wide front has been made since the outbreak occurred: in particular, great efforts have been made to raise standards of kitchen hygiene in Wakefield's hospitals. This progress reflects close collaboration with the local environmental health officers who are satisfied that every effort is being made to raise standards at Wakefield to the highest levels.

    More generally, as the House is aware, on 6 February I announced the Government's intention to bring forward legislation to apply the requirements of the Food Act 1984 to health authorities. This legal change, along with the strengthened guidance which we shall be issuing on hygiene issues, will underpin the new management measures being introduced by Wakefield and Yorkshire health authorities.

    Departmental Office, Camberwell New Road

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he is satisfied with the level of staffing and speed of response to public inquiries at his Department's office at Camberwell new road, SE5.

    I refer the hon. Member to the reply by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Social Services to my hon. Friend the Member for Nuneaton (Mr. Stevens) on 7 March at column 322 in which he gave details of an extra 5,000 posts for local offices in the Department for 1986–87. I am confident that this increase will result in satisfactory staffing levels in individual local offices, including the local office at 6 Camberwell new road, SE5. The office's speed of response to public inquiries has shown a steady and considerable improvement since the beginning of the year.

    Greenock And Port Glasgow

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people are at present awaiting the hearing of tribunal appeal cases at the Greenock and Port Glasgow offices of his Department; and how many people have experienced delays of three, four, five and six months respectively.

    There are 41 social security benefit appeals outstanding at the Greenock office and 76 at the Port Glasgow office.The latest available statistics giving the period between the lodgement of an appeal and the subsequent hearing are for the quarter ended 31 December 1984 and relate to Scotland. Equivalent figures are not available for localities smaller than a social security region.

    Clearance rate (in weeks) from lodgement of appeal to hearing
    WeeksGreat BritainScotland
    191
    219
    31679
    472235
    51,50797
    62,150122
    72,169123
    82,182133
    91,91690
    101,73386
    111,45386
    121,31969
    131,16861
    Over 139,626445
    Average13·913·3

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many claims for single payments have been made in each quarterly period for the last three full years for which figures are available at the Greenock and Port Glasgow offices of his Department.

    The following figures relate to decisions on single payment claims—separate figures for claims are not kept—for each four-week period in the past three years. Figures are not kept quarterly.

    Single Payment Decisions
    Four Weeks EndingGreenockPort Glasgow
    15 March 1983423359
    12 April 1983401307
    10 May 1983393281

    Four Weeks Ending

    Greenock

    Port Glasgow

    7 June 1983413269
    5 July 1983485359
    2 August 1983246246
    30 August 1983565328
    27 September 1983493365
    25 October 1983490390
    22 November 1983551336
    20 December 1983624402
    17 January 1984315172
    4 February 1984565444
    13 March 1984599374
    10 April 1984549388
    8 May 1984604503
    5 June 1984578628
    3 July 1984661775
    31 July 1984722610
    28 August 1984888601
    25 September 1984885445
    23 October 1984979713
    20 November 1984973702
    18 December 19841,119848
    15 January 1985526398
    12 February 19851,080845
    12 March 19851,142845
    9 April 19851,232688
    7 May 19851,010707
    4 June 19851.096792
    2 July 19851,155877
    30 July 19851,221797
    27 August 19851,000719
    24 September 19851.092606
    22 October 19851,140935
    19 November 19851,277999
    17 December 19851,3181,185
    14 January 1986477638
    11 February 19861,4411,415

    Notes:

    (1) A single payment claim may result in more than one decision.

    (2) These figures include decisions not to pay single payments.

    (3) The basis for recording decisions changed on 11 April 1984. Up to then only one decision resulted from a claim covering items under different single payment regulations. Since then a decision has been recorded for each appropriate single payment regulation covered by the claim.

    asked the Secretary or State for Social Services how many new claims for social security were made in the past 12 months to the Greenock and Port Glasgow offices of his Department; how many of these are still awaiting assessment; and how long they have, on average, been awaiting assessment.

    The following figures relate to supplementary benefit claims:

    GreenockPort Glasgow
    Decisions given in 12 months up to 11 February 1986*12,9695,723
    Awaiting assessment on 11 February 1986507229
    Average clearance times10 days7½ days
    * Separate figures are not collected for supplementary benefit claims received.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many live claims for social security the Greenock and Port Glasgow offices of his Department are currently handling.

    On 11 February 1986 the supplementary benefit live load at Greenock was 11,386 and at Port Glasgow 5,030. The figures are marginally higher than the numbers of live claims being handled at that time because they include some claims which had recently finished.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many requests for home visits have been received by the Greenock and Port Glasgow offices of his Department in the past 12 months; how many are currently outstanding; and on average, for how long they have been outstanding.

    Information is not available in the precise form requested because records are not kept of the number of requests for home visits. In the 12 months up to 11 February 1986, 7,685 home visits were made (including those initiated by the Department), 317 are currently outstanding and the average clearance time was just under

    Greenock ILO
    Number of Cases in Action
    ComplementStaff in PostSupplementary BenefitShort-term BenefitsSevere Disablement AllowanceDisablement Benefit
    19801341406,465N/AN/A472
    19821441468,480N/AN/A555
    198516217610,6643,380370573
    198616417211,3864,023442560

    Port Glasgow ILO

    As Port Glasgow ILO did not open until October 1981, information is provided from 1982 onwards.

    Number of Cases in Action

    Complement

    Staff in Post

    Supplementary Benefit

    Short-term Benefits

    Severe Disablement Allowance

    Disablement Benefit

    198271743,813N/AN/A375
    198570764,8261,501232423
    198674745,0301,647272391

    Note: Complement and staff in post relate to March in the stated year. All other figures relate to February.

    Abbreviation: N/A—Not Available; ILO—Integrated Local Office.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many urgent needs payments have been made to claimants in the last 12 months by the Greenock and Port Glasgow offices of his Department; and how many are currently outstanding.

    In the 12-month period up to 11 February 1986, 884 urgent needs payments were made at Greenock and 380 at Port Glasgow. Neither office had any outstanding on that date.

    Community Care

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, of the money set aside for the help the community to care scheme, how much of the original sum has been spent; and on what projects.

    I refer the right hon. Member to my reply to him on 27 January at columns 397–98.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what consideration has been given to giving funding to organisations whose work load has increased as a consequence of the help the community to care project, notably the Association of Crossroads Care Attendant Schemes.

    It is open to any organisation, including Crossroads, to charge for its services when its help or advice is sought by those managing individual elements of the helping the community to care programme. In general,

    12 days. The comparable figures for Port Glasgow show that 3,293 home visits were made, 53 are currently outstanding and the average clearance time was just over 11 days.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will state the approved and actual staffing levels at the Greenock and Port Glasgow offices of his Department in March 1980, March 1982, March 1985 and the latest available date; and if he will give the number of live claims in the two offices for each of these dates.

    The information requested is as follows:we provide core support to national voluntary organisations through our scheme of grants under section 64 of the Health Services and Public Health Act 1968. I am pleased that we have been able to increase our grant to Crossroads under that scheme to £75,000 a year.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how much money from the help the community to care scheme has been given to (a) Age Concern, (b) the British Red Cross, (c) the King's Fund Centre, (d) MENCAP, (e) Dr. Barnardo's, (f) the Save the Children Fund and (g) Crossroad Care Attendant schemes in the last year.

    Figures for 1985–86 are not yet available, but the table shows the payments made to the bodies concerned in 1984–85:

    £
    Age Concern13,500
    King's Fund Centre20,984
    MENCAP50,000
    Save the Children Fund82,000

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what plans the Government have to encourage the growth of community care.

    For a detailed discussion of our aims and our action in relation to community care for mentally handicapped and mentally ill people, I refer my hon. Friend to the Government response to the second report from the Social Services Committee, on community care (Cmnd. 9674), published in November last year. We seek to encourage the development of good quality integrated local services to meet a range of needs by publicising policies, disseminating good practice, and promoting cooperation between statutory bodies and between them and voluntary bodies and the private sector in making the best use of the available resources.

    Health Authorities

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what are the names of those district health authorities where the most senior adviser to the health authority is the director of nurse education;(2) what are the names of those district health authorities which, consequent on the Griffiths committee recommendations, have

    (a) abolished the post of chief nursing officer or its equivalent and (b) appointed such officers but have not made them members of the district management board.

    Every health authority has identified a chief nursing adviser to be the principal source of professional advice on nursing matters to the authority and to be responsible for monitoring professional standards of nursing care throughout the authority. Titles vary although I understand that 73 health authorities have retained the title of chief or district nursing officer. Where the chief nursing adviser is not a full member of an authority's management board or team it should be by agreement locally. I regret that information is not held centrally on the members of authorities where this is the case, or where the chief nursing adviser role is also combined with that of director of nurse education although I understand that only a small number of authorities are involved.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list in the Official Report the numbers of district health authority chairmen and chairwomen who wished to continue in office but who were not reappointed in each year since 1979, together with their length of service.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what are the names of those health authorities which, consequent on the implementation of the Griffiths committee's recommendations, have proposed early retirement or required termination of employment of nurses, together with the relevant number in each authority.

    I regret that no information is held centrally on termination of employment other than by early retirement. To date my Department has been informed of nine early retirements of nurses resultant to the implementation of general management, one in each of the following health authorities:

    • North West Durham
    • Great Yarmouth and Waveney
    • Peterborough
    • South West Hertfordshire
    • Hillington
    • Isle of Wight
    • Winchester
    • Cheltenham
    • Solihull

    Residential Care

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what Government regulations there are on the opening and operation of private residential care homes; and whether the Government carry out regular inspections of the homes.

    I refer my hon. Friend to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Leicester. East (Mr. Bruinvels) on 16 December 1985 at column 80.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the amount given to National Health Service residential care homes for the mentally handicapped; and what it was in 1984 and 1985.

    The term "residential care home'' is defined in the Registered Homes Act 1984 in connection with private and voluntary sector homes and not used for National Health Service provision. We are planning, for 1985–86, for the first time to collect and analyse information on expenditure in respect of small National Health Service units in the community for mentally handicapped people. Information on the allocation of funds to these units is not available centrally.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what are the qualifications necessary to work in a National Health Service residential care home; what they are to work in a private home; why the qualifications differ; and whether the Government have any intention of changing this.

    No specific qualifications are laid down centrally for the staff of residential homes, which are either operated by local authorities (not by the National Health Service) or are privately owned and registered with local authorities. It is for local authorities to decide what qualifications or experience they require of their own staff and whether the staff of homes registered with them are suitably qualified and competent. In a circular, LAC (86) 6, about to be issued, local authorities are reminded that they should be broadly consistent about standards across the public and private sectors and should not expect higher standards in registered homes than they have in their own homes. A copy of the circular will be placed in the Library.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the increase of residential places provided by local authorities since 1981 for the elderly, the mentally ill and the handicapped.

    The increase in residential places provided by local authorities between 31 March 1981 and 31 March 1985, the latest date for which provisional figures are available, is shown in the table.

    Places in Local Authorities Homes in England
    at 31 March 1981at 31 March 1985 (provisional)
    Elderly/disabled people114,921116,100
    Mentally handicapped people12,71215,200
    Mentally ill people3,9814,400

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what are the Government's reasons for giving board and lodging benefits to those in private residential care homes.

    Supplementary benefit is paid to people without enough resources to meet their requirements as specified in regulations. The regulations define the requirements of people in homes as equivalent to the charge they have to pay, subject to maximum limits which are related to the types of care which the home is registered to provide.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what changes have been made in benefits to those in private residential care homes since 1979.

    The history is given in the introduction to the report of the joint working party on supplementary benefit and residential care, publication of which I announced in my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Mid-Kent (Mr. Rowe) on 28 January at column 501. A copy of the report is in the Library.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the current waiting period for someone seeking admission into National Health Service homes for the elderly and into National Health Service homes for the mentally ill in Hertfordshire.

    I am sorry I cannot give my hon. Friend the information he seeks in precisely the form requested. Information available centrally concerns the numbers of persons awaiting admission to consultant departments of NHS hospitals and is given in the table.

    Number of cases* on in-patient waiting list for selected specialties—NHS hospitals in Hertfordshire at 30 September 1985 (provisional)
    SpecialtyAll casesCases on list for more than one year
    Geriatrics33
    Mental illness2216
    Psychogeriatrics7
    * None of these cases was reported as urgent.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what amount of money has been given in supplementary benefit to people receiving care in private homes for the elderly, the mentally ill and the handicapped; and what was the increase from 1984 and 1985.

    In 1983 the amount paid in supplementary benefit to people in all private voluntary residential care and nursing homes was £102 million. The estimated figure for 1984 is £190 million. No figures are yet available for 1985. It is not possible to break down the figures by all the client groups requested, or to distinguish between private and voluntary homes.

    Carers

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what changes have been made in benefits to those caring for the elderly, mentally ill or disabled persons since 1979.

    Eligibility for invalid care allowance was extended in 1981 to those caring for non-relatives. In 1982 the amount that beneficiaries are allowed to earn was doubled from £6 to £12 a week. As regards supplementary benefit, the qualifying period for moving from the ordinary to the long-term scale rate was reduced from two years to one year in 1980.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services as invalid care allowance is not extended to married women, what steps are taken to ensure that married women are able to have the necessary home help, such as a visiting nurse.

    Domestic help is available for those who are assessed to be in need of it from local authority home help services. It rests with district health authorities to assess, in individual cases, the need to provide community nursing services.

    Rotherham Health Authority

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he is satisfied with the discharge of its functions by Rotherham health authority.

    The regional health authority concerned is generally responsible for monitoring the way in which individual district health authorities discharge their functions but I am not aware of any general dissatisfaction with the Rotherham health authority.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services for what reasons the services of Mr. Vernon Thomas as chairman of the Rotherham health authority are being terminated.

    Supplementary Benefit

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people are in receipt of supplementary benefit in the area of Oxted, Surrey.

    Separate figures showing the number of people receiving supplementary benefit in Oxted, Surrey, are not available. Oxted forms a small part of the area covered for supplementary benefit purposes by the Department's office at Redhill. On 11 February 1986, the latest date for which information is available, there were 7,945 people receiving supplementary benefit from Redhill office.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people are presently awaiting single payments in the north-west region of his Department and nationally; and how many have been waiting for more than four weeks, eight weeks and 12 weeks, respectively.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many single payments were made from the Huyton office of his Department during each of the last five years and in 1986 to date.

    Severe Weather Payments

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people successfully claimed exceptionally severe weather payments in Oxted, Surrey, in 1985; and what was the average amount paid.

    The information is not available in the form requested. Oxted, Surrey, forms part of the area covered by Redhill local office. In 1985 that office paid 174 claimants an average of £11·71 in respect of extra fuel used during the period of exceptionally severe weather.

    Departmental Achievements

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when he expects to answer the question concerning his Department's achievements tabled by the hon. Member for Crawley on 18 February.

    Smoking-Related Diseases

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many days were lost from work in 1985 through emphysema, bronchitis and other chest and heart diseases which have connections with cigarette smoking.

    Most recent figures for the main conditions are:

    Days of Certified Incapacity for Sickness and Invalidity Benefit: Great Britain—5 April 1982 to 2 April 1983
    CauseICD Code*Million Days
    Emphysema4921·9
    Bronchitis490,49119·9
    Other Obstructive Lung Disease4961·4
    Malignant Neoplasm of Trachea, Bronchus and Lung1620·3
    Ischaemic Heart Disease410–41430·9
    * International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision.No information is available on uncertified absences from work.

    Drugs

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he intends to implement the proposals made to him by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry to terminate the parallel import of drugs.

    I am not aware of any such proposals from the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what changes are intended in National Health Service pharmaceutical prices and distribution costs from 1 April; what are his intentions for the recovery of discounts on parallel import drugs; and if he will make a statement.

    There will be no general change in the manufacturers' prices of medicines covered by the pharmaceutical price regulation scheme (PPRS) until the present negotiations for a renewal of the scheme are completed and the changes thus agreed are implemented. These negotiations continue, with a view to introducing a renewed scheme during 1986–87.

    The majority of NHS medicines are subject to control under the PPRS, but prices reimbursed to pharmacies for generic medicines are determined separately. Agreement has been reached with representatives of generic manufacturers on a number of changes, which will reduce the average NHS price of generic medicines. Agreement has also been reached with representatives of NHS community pharmacies for an interim increase of 1·5 per cent. in the average rate of deduction from their reimbursement to reflect the discounts now widely obtainable on the published prices of pharmaceutical products generally. The new rates of discount recovery will average nearly 7·5 per cent. and are subject to revision in the light of the results of a full inquiry into discount levels which will start shortly and be completed by early 1987. Details of the changes in generic prices and the discount recovery scale will be published in the April amendment to the drug tariff. Taken together, these changes should bring a saving of nearly £30 million in NHS expenditure.

    I also intend to establish an informal working group involving representatives of manufacturers, wholesalers and NHS retail pharmacies which will assess more generally and for the longer term the arrangements for the financial regulation of NHS pharmaceutical distribution. I have invited the interests concerned to nominate members of the working group, and hope to appoint an independent chairman. I expect the group to report this summer.

    Estimates from various sources suggest that parallel imports account for a small fraction of NHS medicines. All discounts on both domestic and parallel imported drugs will be identified by the discount inquiry. When this information is available I will consider how to modify the reimbursement system to ensure that the arrangements are fair to all concerned.

    National Maritime Board

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services on what date the National Maritime Board obtained the status of a community health council; and by which statutory instrument that status was given effect.

    The National Maritime Board has not been granted the status of a community health council.

    Technical Services Agency Ltd

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish in the Official Report a copy of his response to the letter dated 5 March from the Technical Services Agency Ltd., Glasgow, on Scottish climate and severe weather energy penalties in tenanted housing.

    The letter dated 5 March from the Technical Services Agency Ltd., was received on 11 March. This is being considered and I will send the hon. Member a copy of the reply.

    Nhs Hospitals (Private Patients)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many private patients had appointments with consultants in National Health Service hospitals in the west midlands region in each of the last seven years; what sums were paid to each authority in the region for the use of rooms for such consultations; and what was the length of the waiting lists for different categories of treatments in each authority each year during the same period.

    [pursuant to his reply, 7 March 1986, c. 317.]: The available information is given in the tables.

    Numbers of cases on in-patient waiting list for admission to NHS hospitals in West Midland RHA at 30 September
    Specialty197919801981198219831984*1985
    General medicine228126223217179135203
    Paediatrics72363
    Dermatology6680987153106154
    Neurology269221405408356405273
    Cardiology591458386384370339318
    Rheumatology190182149224258376101
    Geriatrics752770710436327204181
    Younger disabled1020342019715
    General surgery23,74522,25720,68822,60621,64920,03518,567
    ENT13,82111,86013,33914,24713,89914,15915,020
    Traumatic and Orthopaedic17,05215,45115,20416,80716,82416,53115,937
    Ophthalmology7,1246,3335,9806,7057,0107,6667,055
    Radiotherapy1261418658491720
    Urology2,1042,2002,1202,7502,8863,0763,315
    Plastic surgery4,2704,2304,4704,2423,4022,9432,845
    Thoracic surgery821816580646597609399
    Oral surgery2,7182,5242,7643,1422,7553,3813,536
    Neurosurgery5726176198419861,004914
    Gynaecology11,16810,65910,48412,18911,59411,79811,728
    Psychiatry children2311519617
    Mental handicap80644226236
    Mental illness220250241184175149120
    Adolescent psychiatry33
    GP other1,4751,4571,045
    Other specialist units258210278337175161253
    Total87,69380,93779,95286,54483,59883,11980,974
    * Provisional.

    Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

    Common Agricultural Policy (Budget)

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what would be the reduction in each case in the common agricultural policy budget for 1986 as a result of a 1 per cent. price reduction on the EEC Commission's price proposals for each of the following commodities: cereals, milk, beef and olive oil

    Dairy Products (Subsidy)

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if, pursuant to his reply of 10 March

    United Kingdom imports of chicken and broiler meat
    198319841985
    Ports of entryTonnes£'000Tonnes£'000Tonnes£'000
    London90782019
    Medway178150402355421395
    Ramsgate171373635751

    Private out-patients attending at NHS hospitals in West Midlands RHA

    Year

    Total attendances

    19783,001
    19794,245
    19804,907
    19815,761
    19826,629
    19837,795
    19848,828

    concerning the decision of the Commission not to publish the rates of subsidy for export of dairy products, it will still be the practice of Her Majesty's Government to make such details available to hon. Members in reply to parliamentary questions; and if he will make a statement.

    We intend to continue to answer hon. Members' questions in the usual way.

    Broilermeat And Chickenmeat

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list the imports of broilermeat and chickenmeat in Scotland, England and Wales in the years 1983, 1984, 1985 and to the nearest available date in 1986; and if he will give the ports of entry.

    [pursuant to his reply, 11 March 1986, c. 437]: The table shows the information requested.

    1983

    1984

    1985

    Ports of entry

    Tonnes

    £'000

    Tonnes

    £'000

    Tonnes

    £'000

    Dover11,9189,50611,2139,6908,7308,192
    Folkestone2729851036084
    Newhaven34417266610
    Portsmouth38301,2421,0251,5281,238
    Southampton161338
    Poole8578052,1111,9604,8654,294
    Weymouth19159174
    Plymouth1,0949774,8954,1779,7068,107
    Newport271529320710463
    Dundee2020
    Greenock4234
    Grangemouth1,6221,4771,2471,229666669
    Fishguard118
    Leith4033961,6141,663
    Blyth1715
    Fleetwood1916
    Tyne1,6161,2717836692,3001,964
    Middlesborough4904445751
    Hull1,1989732,7562,6142,5322,435
    Immingham157129281255375340
    Grimsby4,5843,8712,6862,4671,9931,792
    Felixstowe8,1186,6967,0836,3775,9075,676
    Great Yarmouth239190
    Ipswich16144373897369
    Harwich8,5557,0785,8415,2286,5535,762
    Liverpool981211
    Holyhead1411
    Guernsey151134144139134123
    Jersey332310329323365360
    Irish Land Boundary1,104928754670684657
    Heathrow24
    Other air ports88106
    Total42,51435,20243,25938,52048,86244,105

    Notes:

    1. No information is available for 1986.

    2. Figures for broiler meat and chicken meat are not recorded separately.

    3. Imports into Scotland, England and Whales are not recorded separately but only by mainland port of entry.

    Source: UK Trade Statistics.

    Pesticides

    asked the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in which counties in England and Wales pesticide registration authorities require products for home and garden use to be packed in child-restraint packages and rodenticides to be used only in tamper-proof bait stations; and what proposals are presently being considered by his Department under the Food and Environment Protection Act 1985 to control packaging on a nationwide basis.

    [pursuant to his reply, 12 March 1986, c. 483]: There are no local pesticide registration authorities in the United Kingdom. Registration of pesticides is at present carried out on a nationwide basis under the non-statutory pesticides safety precautions scheme. It has not been possible to control packaging precisely as the hon. Member suggests under these non-statutory arrangements, but it has been a fundamental principle of the scheme that only low toxicity products in small volume packs are cleared for home and garden use and that the labels carry warnings to keep the products or baits away from children or pets. In addition, certain products are supplied in child-resistant bait stations.It is proposed that under the regulations to be made under part III of the Food and Environment Protection Act 1985 it be made a condition of the approval of a pesticide that the container in which it is supplied be approved by the Government for that purpose; supply in a different container thus becoming a criminal offence. In setting standards for containers the Government will rely on the advice of the Advisory Committee on Pesticides and the newly constituted Panel on Labelling and Container Design.

    National Finance

    Construction Industry

    16.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent representations he has received from the construction industry about the incidence of taxation on that industry.

    My right hon. Friend has received a number of representations, covering a variety of proposals.

    Income Tax

    17.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the yield of all taxation from those earning £30,000 or more in 1985–86.

    The total income tax yield in 1985–86 from individuals with taxable income above £30,000 is £4½ billion, of which nearly £2 billion is paid on taxable income in excess of £30,000. It is not possible to estimate the yield of other taxes from this group.

    33.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what changes there have been in the number of people paying income tax since 1979; how this compares with the previous five year period; and if he will make a statement.

    The estimated numbers of individual taxpayers (including earning wives) since 1973–74 are as follows:

    (thousands)
    Individual taxpayers
    1973–7423,100
    1974–7524,300
    1975–7625,300
    1976–7725,900
    1977–7824,800
    1978–7925,900
    1979–8025,900
    1980–8125,200
    1981–8224,800
    1982–8324,600
    Earnings after income tax*, national insurance contributions and child benefit
    SingleMarried couple (two earners)‡ no childrenMarried couple (one earner) two children║
    Earnings†At current prices £At constant (1978–79) prices £As per cent. of gross income Per cent.At current prices £At constant (1978–79) prices £As per cent. of gross income Per cent.At current prices £At constant (1978–79) prices £As per cent. of gross income Per cent.
    50 per cent. average earnings
    1978–7935·4835·4876·563·9863·9884·245·2645·2697·5
    1979–8042·1536·3977·175·5765·2584·253·9046·5498·6
    1980–8149·4936·7375·389·0366·0881·962·4846·3895·1
    1981–8253·3435·5173·195·5163·5979·167·6545·0492·7
    1982–8357·2335·5972·7102·9464·0179·073·2545·5593·1
    1983–8462·4537·0973·0113·0467·1479·680·4647·7994·1
    1984–8567·9938·4573·5123·2269·6880·487·8849·7095·0
    1985–8673·6639·3073·7134·8971·9681·594·6850·5194·8
    1986–87¶78·6840·5573·6143·9674·2081·3100·5051·8094·0
    75 per cent. average earnings
    1978–7949·5149·5171·187·2787·2776·659·4159·4185·4
    1979–8059·5051·3772·6104·1789·9477·371·2561·5286·9
    1980–8170·2752·1671·3123·3991·5975·783·2661·8084·5
    1981–8276·0550·6369·5133·1088·6273·590·3660·1682·6
    1982–8381·3350·5768·9142·8588·8373·197·3560·5482·5
    1983–8488·5352·5969·0156·3592·8773·4106·5363·2883·1
    1984–8596·2054·4069·3169·9596·1174·0116·1065·6583·7
    1985–86104·1355·5569·5184·0498·1874·2125·1566·7683·5
    1986–87¶111·2857·3669·4196·56101·3174·0133·1068·6083·0
    100 per cent. average earnings
    1978–7963·5563·5568·5110·26110·2672·573·4573·4579·1
    1979–8076·8566·3570·3132·68114·5573·988·6076·5081·1
    1980–8191·0467·5869·3157·75117·0972·6104·0377·2279·2
    1981–8298·7665·7567·7170·70113·6570·7113·0675·2777·5
    1982–83105·4465·5767·0182·75113·6470·1121·4575·5277·2
    1983–84114·6168·0867·0199·66118·6070·3132·6178·7777·5
    1984–85124·4270·3667·3216·67122·5370·7144·3181·6178·0
    1985–86134·6071·8167·4234·50125·1070·9155·6283·0277·9
    1986–87¶143·8974·1767·3250·56129·1570·8165·7085·4177·5
    150 per cent. average earnings
    1978–7992·8792·8766·7155·37155·3768·1102·77102·7773·8
    1979–80113·4397·9369·2189·61163·7170·4125·18108·0876·4
    1980–81134·77100·0468·4224·27166·4768·8147·76109·6875·0
    1981–82145·6396·9666·5242·92161·7367·0159·94106·4973·1
    1982–83155·0596·4265·7258·89160·9966·2171·06106·3772·5
    1983–84168·70100·2165·8282·39167·7466·3186·70110·9072·8
    1984–85183·32103·6766·1305·97173·0366·6203·21114·9173·2

    (thousands)

    Individual taxpayers

    *1983–8424,300
    *1984–8524,050
    *1985–8624,000

    * Provisional,

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his estimate of the effects of changes in personal taxation on disposable incomes for each year since 1978–79 for single people, married couples (both working, without children) and married couples (husband only working, with two children) on 50 per cent., 75 per cent., 100 per cent., 150 per cent., 200 per cent. and 500 per cent. of average earnings expressed in current and constant prices and as a percentage of gross earnings; and what is his estimate for 1986–87 on the basis of the conventional assumptions of index-linked allowances and duties.

    Single

    Married couple (two earners)‡ no children

    Married couple (one earner) two children║

    Earnings†

    At current prices £

    At constant (1978–79) prices £

    As per cent. of gross income Per cent.

    At current prices £

    At constant (1978–79) prices £

    As per cent. of gross income Per cent.

    At current prices £

    At constant (1978–79) prices £

    As per cent. of gross income Per cent.

    1985–86198·66105·9866·3331·34176·7666·8219·68117·1973·3
    1986–87¶212·31109·4366·2354·16182·5566·7234·13120·6873·0

    200 per cent. average earnings

    1978–79123·06123·0666·3202·10202·1066·5133·85133·8572·1
    1979–80151·30130·6369·2248·39214·4669·2163·44141·1174·8
    1980–81178·75132·6868·0295·81219·5768·1193·23143·4373·5
    1981–82191·26127·3465·5318·34211·9565·9207·58138·2071·1
    1982–83206·28128·2765·5341·73212·5065·6232·99144·8874·0
    1983–84225·86134·1666·0374·02222·1665·8245·80146·0071·9
    1984–85244·54138·2966·1404·21228·5866·0266·64150·7872·1
    1985–86264·03140·8566·1436·69232·9666·0287·45153·3571·9
    1986–87¶281·95145·3365·9466·59240·5065·9306·30157·8871·6

    500 per cent. average earnings

    1978–79221·83221·8347·8396·19396·1952·1237·79237·7951·2
    1979–80312·45269·7657·2536·54463·2459·7327·95283·1560·0
    1980–81366·09271·7455·7633·40470·1558·3383·52284·6758·4
    1981–82390·72260·1453·6676·97450·7256·0409·47272·6256·1
    1982–83425·72264·7354·1737·02458·3156·6446·82277·8556·8
    1983–84469·43278·8454·9813·52483·2257·3493·26292·9957·7
    1984–85506·02286·1554·7875·63495·1757·2532·54301·1557·6
    1985–86543·98290·2054·5942·16502·6256·9572·21305·2657·3
    1986–87¶580·53299·2354·31,005·68518·3656·8609·96314·3957·1

    Notes

    *Estimates do not include income-related benefits to which some taxpayers may be entitled.

    †Earnings are based on adult rates for those in full time work with pay unaffected by absence.

    ‡Assuming husband and wife have earnings at the same multiple of the earnings distribution for full time males and full time females respectively.

    ║Child benefit assumes two children aged under 11.

    ¶Average earnings are assumed to increase by 7 per cent. between 1985–86 and 1986–87, as in the Autumn Statement, 1985.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his estimate of the effects of changes in personal taxation on disposable incomes for each year since 1978–79 for single people, married couples (both working, without children), and married couples (husband only working, without children), for the lowest decile, lowest quartile, median, upper quartile, median, upper quartile and highest decile of all males and females, expressed in current and constant prices and as a percentage of gross earnings; and what is his estimate for 1986–87 on the basis of the conventional assumptions of index-linked allowances and duties.

    Information in the following tables is based on estimates of earnings for those in full-time work

    Earnings after income tax, National Insurance contributions and Child Benefit
    SingleMarried Couple (two earners)† No ChildrenMarried Couple (one earner) 2 Children*
    At current prices £At constant April 85 prices £As per cent. of gross income Per cent.At current prices £At constant April 85 prices £As per cent. of gross income Per cent.At current prices £At constant April 85 prices £As per cent. of gross income Per cent.
    Lowest Decile of earnings
    April 7839·3575·6174·573·17140·5980·748·7193·5992·3
    April 7944·0976·9673·981·77142·7379·855·9097·5893·6
    April 8053·4776·6674·398·48141·1979·765·9394·5291·6
    April 8157·6773·7972·2105·71135·2777·071·6291·6589·6
    April 8261·9572·4571·7114·03133·3676·877·5390·6789·7
    April 8366·9175·2472·1123·66139·0677·684·4394·9491·0

    paid at adult rates, with pay unaffected by absence. Estimates are based on information from the annual new earnings surveys. Latest information is for April 1985.

    Income tax rates and allowances for April 1979 are those specified in the Finance Act 1979, later replaced by those announced in June 1979; for other Aprils, they are the rates and allowances for the financial year immediately following. Taxpayers are assumed to have no reliefs or allowances other than the appropriate personal allowance. National insurance contributions are at the contracted-in rate.

    The calculations take no account of income-related benefits to which those at the lowest decile and quartile may be entitled. Changes in the purchasing power of net earnings have been calculated by reference to movements in the general index of retail prices between Aprils.

    Single

    Married Couple (two earners)† No Children

    Married Couple (one earner) 2 Children*

    At current prices £

    At constant April 85 prices £

    As per cent. of gross income Per cent.

    At current prices £

    At constant April 85 prices £

    As per cent. of gross income Per cent.

    At current prices £

    At constant April 85 prices £

    As per cent. of gross income Per cent.

    April 8471·9676·9472·7133·29142·5178·591·5997·9392·5
    April 8576·8376·8373·1144·46144·4679·997·7497·7493·0

    Lower Quartile of earnings

    April 7846·5589·4471·983·70160·8277·455·91107·4286·4
    April 7952·6291·8571·394·36164·7176·564·43112·4787·3
    April 8064·1091·9072·2114·17163·6876·976·55109·7586·2
    April 8169·4488·8670·3123·08157·4974·583·39106·7184·4
    April 8274·9387·6369·6133·26155·8574·190·51105·8584·1
    April 8381·0091·0969·9144·58162·5874·698·52110·7985·0
    April 8487·2193·2570·3157·02167·8975·3106·84114·2386·2
    April 8593·7993·7970·6168·99168·9975·6114·70114·7086·3

    Median of earnings

    April 7856·29108·1569·799·13190·4774·265·65126·1481·2
    April 7963·94111·6169·1115·73202·0175·775·75132·2381·9
    April 8078·52112·5770·4137·00196·4174·390·97130·4281·5
    April 8185·56109·4868·6148·67190·2472·199·51127·3379·8
    April 8293·00108·7767·8161·99189·4571·5108·58126·9979·2
    April 83100·64113·1768·0175·81197·7071·8118·17132·8879·8
    April 84109·53117·1168·2192·88206·2372·1129·17138·1180·4
    April 85118·13118·1368·4208·33208·3372·3139·04139·0480·5

    Upper Quartile of earnings

    April 7868·75132·0967·8118·91228·4771·578·11150·0877·0
    April 7978·28136·6467·4135·07235·7770·990·08157·2477·5
    April 8097·62139·9568·8167·43240·0472·0110·07157·8077·6
    April 81108·72139·1267·2185·64237·5569·9122·67156·9775·8
    April 82118·36138·4366·3202·47236·8069·1133·94156·6575·0
    April 83127·91143·8466·3219·37246·6869·4145·43163·5475·4
    April 84139·42149·0766·5242·08258·8369·4159·06170·0775·9
    April 85150·76150·7666·6262·68262·6869·7171·68171·6875·9

    Highest Decile of earnings

    April 7885·50164·2866·7144·40277·4569·394·86182·2674·0
    April 7996·89169·1366·5161·13281·2668·0108·69189·7374·5
    April 80123·64177·2668·2206·57296·1570·2136·09195·1175·1
    April 81139·36178·3366·4228·91292·9167·1153·32196·1973·0
    April 82151·76177·4965·6249·29291·5566·3167·34195·7172·3
    April 83165·83186·4865·7273·97308·0866·8183·36206·1972·6
    April 84181·85194·4366·0302·48323·4166·8201·48215·4273·2
    April 85196·28196·2866·2324·88324·8866·9217·19217·1973·3
    * Both children under 11.
    † Assuming husband and wife have earnings at the same quantile of the earnings distribution for full-time males and full-time females respectively.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will estimate the increase in take-home pay for (a) a single person and (b) a married couple from an increase of 10 per cent. in the threshold for the basic rate of income tax.

    For basic rate taxpayers in 1986–87 the increase would be £1·27 per week for a single person and £2·02 per week for a married couple.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what a single person earning £140 a week would pay now, in income tax and national insurance contributions, at current rates, allowances and rate bands; and what such a person would pay at 1978–79 rates, allowances and rate bands;(2) what a single person earning £8,500 a year would have to pay in income tax

    (a) at current rates, allowances and rate bands and (b) at rates, allowances and rate bands obtaining in June 1979.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what percentage of average earnings has been represented by personal income tax allowances in each of the last 20 years for which figures are available; and what was the percentage change in such allowances in each of those years on the previous year's figures.

    [pursuant to his reply, 5 February 1986, c. 185]: The information is given in the table. Tax thresholds are shown as percentages of both average manual earnings and (for 1970–71 onwards) average earnings for all occupations.

    Tax thresholds 1966–67 to 1985–86—Single person and married man without children

    Single person

    Married man without children

    Threshold at current prices

    Percentage increase on previous year

    Threshold as percentage of average manual earnings*

    Threshold as percentage of average earnings† for all occupations

    Threshold at current prices

    Percentage increase on previous year

    Threshold as percentage of average manual earnings*

    Threshold as percentage of average earnings† for all occupations

    Tax year

    £

    Per cent.

    Per cent.

    Per cent.

    £

    Per cent.

    Per cent.

    Per cent.

    1966–672830·026·8na4370·041·4na
    1967–682830·025·5na4370·039·3na
    1968–692830·023·7na4370·036·5na
    1969–7032815·925·4na48210·337·3na
    1970–7141827·428·726·159824·141·037·3
    1971–724180·025·823·75980·037·033·9
    1972–7359141·432·129·677128·941·838·6
    1973–745950·728·026·47750·536·534·3
    1974·756255·024·422·786511·633·731·4
    1975–766758·021·419·895510·430·328·0
    1976–777358·920·619·11,08513·630·528·2
    1977–7894528·624·422·51,45534·137·634·7
    1978–799854·222·020·41,5355·534·331·8
    1979–801,16518·322·220·51,81518·234·531·9
    1980–811,37518·022·720·12,14518·235·431·4
    1981–821,3750·020·618·12,1450·032·128·3
    1982–831,56513·821·819·12,44514·034·129·9
    1983–841,78514·123·120·12,79514·336·131·4
    1984–852,00512·324·120·83,15512·937·932·8
    1985·86‡2,20510·024·621·23,4559·538·533·3
    * Full time males aged over 21 working a full week
    † Full time males paid at adult rates working a full week
    ‡ Provisional

    Job Creation

    18.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent representations he has received from the Confederation of British Industry concerning the scale of resources currently allocated to measures designed to deal with unemployment.

    My right hon. Friend has received a number of representations from the Confederation of British Industry in recent weeks.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he is able to give an estimate of the number of jobs created as a result of the measures introduced by each Budget statement since 1979.

    Changes in employment since 1979 have been due to a whole range of factors. It is not possible to attribute the changes directly to the various measures announced in successive Budget statements since that time.

    29.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent representations he has received concerning the effect of his taxation policies on employment.

    My right hon. Friend has received a number of representations on this issue.

    Mortgage Interest Relief

    19.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received advocating the abolition of income tax relief on mortgage interest.

    Public Sector Borrowing Requirement

    20.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the level of the public sector borrowing requirement over the last 10 months.

    Public sector borrowing in the first 10 months of 1985–86 was £3·2 billion, as announced on 18 February.

    Public Expenditure

    21.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent representations he has received about his latest forecasts for public expenditure.

    I refer my hon. Friend to the reply I gave earlier to my hon. Friend the Member for Bolton, West (Mr. Sackville).

    22.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the increase in central Government's current spending in each year since 1980; and what are the corresponding figures for local government.

    Between 1980–81 and 1984–85 central Government current spending rose by 46·3 per cent. and local authority current spending relevant for RSG by 37·5 per cent. Two of the major factors behind the increase in public expenditure—defence and the increase in numbers unemployed—have had a significant impact on central Government current spending. The 1984–85 figures are also affected by the impact of the coal strike. The full figures are given in the table.

    Current expenditure: central and local government

    £ billion except where stated

    1980–81 outturn

    1981–82 outturn

    1982–83 outturn

    1983–84 outturn

    1984–85 outturn

    Central government

    Current spending*61·270·378·282·089·5
    Increase in cash9·27·93·87·5
    Percentage increase+15·0+11·2+4·9+9·1

    Local authority

    Current spending18·721·022·824·325·8

    Relevant for RSG*

    Increase in cash2·21·91·51·4
    Percentage increase+11·8+8·9+6·6+5·9
    * Including finance for public corporations.

    32.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement about representations he has received on public expenditure in 1986–87.

    I refer my hon. Friend to the reply I gave earlier to my hon. Friend the Member for Bolton, West (Mr. Sackville).

    34.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will review the working of the public expenditure territorial block formulae.

    The working of the territorial block formulae is kept under constant review.

    35.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received about the public expenditure in 1985–86; and if he will make a statement.

    We receive representations on public expenditure matters throughout the year. The latest estimated outturn for 1985–86 will be given on Budget day.

    Departmental Staff

    23.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the reduction in the number of staff in post in central Government Departments between May 1979 and the latest date for which figures are available; and which is the last year in which a lower number was in post.

    At 1 January 1986 (against a target of 600,475 on 1 April 1986), there were 596,506 staff in central Government Departments, a reduction of 135,769 since 1 April 1979. There was a lower figure at 1 October 1985 (595,764). The next comparable figure was in 1939 when there were 347,000 staff in Government Departments. No figures are available for the years 1940–43, but by 1 April 1944 staff in post numbers had risen to nearly 1·2 million.

    Gross Domestic Product

    24.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the United Kingdom's gross domestic product per

    1979–80 outurn1980–81 outturn1981–82 outturn1982–83 outturn1983–84 outturn1984–85 outturnPer cent. 1985–86 estimated outturn
    Central Government Current28½30½3232½323332

    head; and how this compares with each of the United Kingdom's Community partners in the latest year for which figures are available.

    25.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what information he has on the gross domestic product per head of population for (a) the United Kingdom, (b) Puerto Rico, (c) Yugoslavia and (d) Taiwan for the latest year for which figures are available.

    In 1984 United Kingdom gross domestic product per head stood at £5,600. The table gives a set of comparative figures for the countries requested.

    CountryGNP per head 1984 (US dollars)
    Denmark10,690
    Germany, Federal Republic10,030
    Luxembourg9,240
    France8,910
    Netherlands8,530
    Belgium7,700
    United Kingdom7,500
    Italy6,110
    Ireland4,990
    Spain4,190
    Puerto Rico*3,890
    Greece3,380
    Taiwan*2,600
    Portugal1,910
    Yugoslavia*1,640
    * Figures are for 1983: 1984 figures are not yet available.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish the proportion of gross domestic product taken by (a) central Government current expenditure, (b) central Government capital expenditure, (c) local government current expenditure, (d) local government capital expenditure and (e) all public expenditure in each year from 1979–80 to 1985–86.

    General Government expenditure, and the components requested, as a percentage of GDP are as follows:

    1979–80 outurn

    1980–81 outturn

    1981–82 outturn

    1982–83 outturn

    1983–84 outturn

    1984–85 outturn

    Per cent. 1985–86 estimated outturn

    Capital331
    Local authorities
    Current1010½10½10½10½10½10
    Capital221
    General Government expenditure43½4646½46½4645½44½

    It should be noted that central Government current spending includes most defence expenditure, much of which is of a capital nature, and that both central government and local authority capital spending include sales of physical assets. This particularly affects local authority capital spending which is reduced as a result of council house sales. Table 1.14 of the 1986 public exenditure White Paper adjusts for these factors.

    International Monetary Conference

    26.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received concerning the need for an international monetary conference.

    My right hon. Friend has received no such representations recently.

    Infrastructure Projects

    27.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he has any plans to bring forward measures to increase investment in public infrastructure projects; and if he will make a statement.

    The 1986 public expenditure White Paper (Cmnd. 9702) set out the Government's spending plans for future years. It showed increases over previous plans in capital spending, notably on housing renovation and roads.

    Civil Service Catering Organisation

    28.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he is satisfied with the working of the Civil Service Catering Organisation; how he monitors its effectiveness; and if he will make a statement.

    I am satisfied with the working of the Civil Service Catering Organisation. Catering is one of the services which is subject to competition and the organisation now operates on an almost wholly commercial basis. Having only a token Vote, the organisation is required to meet all its expenditure from the receipts from restaurant customers and the Departments it serves. The chief executive reports to me regularly throughout the year on its performance. In addition, the organisation has developed value for money indicators and established targets for 1985–86 which it has more than met. Further improvements are expected in 1986–87.

    Share Ownership

    30.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what plans he has to increase share participation by employees in their own and other publicly quoted companies; and if he will make a statement.

    I cannot anticipate my right hon. Friend's Budget statement. However the Government remain firmly committed to supporting both employee share ownership and wider share ownership generally. Our policies have already encouraged the introduction and operation of large numbers of employee share schemes, and have enabled millions of people to obtain shares in privatised companies.

    Vat And Income Tax

    31.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received on the levels of value added tax and income tax for 1986–87.

    Manufacturing Output

    36.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what measures he intends taking to encourage an increase in United Kingdom manufacturing output.

    Our policies to exert downward pressure on inflation and to stimulate the supply side of the economy will continue to maintain an environment in which all sectors of the economy can flourish. Supply side policies promote the flexible operation of labour, goods and financial markets by sharpening incentives, encouraging competition and enterprise, and promoting deregulation. Measures include privatisation, contracting out of public services, the simplification of taxes to remove distortions and improve incentives to work, and reforms to ease rigidities in the labour market. The fall in oil prices and its effects will of course bring substantial benefits to the manufacturing sector. The Government also provide substantial direct assistance to manufacturing industry. In 1984–85 over £2 billion, largely going to manufacturing industry, was provided through regional and territorial spending, through support to particular sectors, support to exports and through expenditure on training. [A detailed breakdown is given in the annex to the Government's reply to the report of the House of Lords Select Committee (Cmnd. 9697).]

    Oil

    37.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will make a statement on the role of oil in the United Kingdom economy.

    Like other industrialised countries the United Kingdom is a major oil consumer. Unlike most of the other countries the United Kingdom is also an oil producer. But North sea oil and gas accounts for only 5 to 6 per cent. of national income and only 5 per cent. of our capital investment. Net oil exports make up 8 per cent. of total exports. North sea revenues constitute 8½ per cent. of total United Kingdom tax revenues. And North sea related employment represents under ½ per cent. of total United Kingdom employment.

    Unemployment Costs

    38.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his estimate of net average cost to the Treasury of an unmarried man who is unemployed, as against one in employment on average earnings.

    The estimated average cost per beneficiary of benefits paid in respect of unemployment is £2,400 for 1985–86. The corresponding figure for an unmarried man is not available. It is not possible to estimate the revenue foregone.

    Public Sector Investment

    39.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his most recent estimate of the proportion of gross domestic product spent on public sector investment.

    Total public sector capital spending, as shown in table 1.14 of the 1986 public expenditure White Paper, was some £21 billion in 1984–85, representing 6·5 per cent. of GDP.

    Petrol (Revenue Tax And Duty)

    40.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what are the current yields of petrol revenue tax and petrol duty.

    Receipts of petroleum revenue tax (including advance payments) and petrol duty in 1984–85 were £7,177 million and £4,680 million respectively.

    Inflation

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement about the current level of inflation.

    Over the 12 months to January 1986, the retail prices index increased by 5·5 per cent.

    Devon And Cornwall (Ec Aid)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list separately for the counties of Devon and Cornwall for the period 1976 to 1985 the moneys received in each of the counties as loans from the European investment bank.

    The value of loans signed for the period 1976 to 1985 is shown in the following table:

    Direct loans from EIB Own Resources
    £ million
    DevonCornwall
    19764·0
    19772·5
    19784·0
    19797·2
    1980*2·1*3·9

    Devon

    Cornwall

    1981*2·1*6·9
    1982*3·6*1·4
    19834·0
    1984*7·6*1·4
    198510·0
    Total40·620·1
    * Includes EIB rough estimate of allocations to Cornwall/Devon in respect of four EIB loans for water

    supply and sewerage treatment in the south-west region

    conducted by the South West water authority.

    In addition, the two counties may have benefited from global loans to help small and medium-sized enterprises in the assisted areas, but detailed information on these loans is not readily available.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will indicate for the years 1976 to 1985 the value of aid granted for projects in Devon and Cornwall separately by the European Community under the supplementary measures.

    Supplementary measures did not begin until 1980, when the United Kingdom's transitional own resources arrangements agreed on accession expired.Payments under the 30 May 1980 agreement to reduce the United Kingdom's net contribution by supplementary measures were made in respect of the 1980, 1981 and 1982 budgets. They included expenditure in support of public expenditure programmes in the assisted areas of the south-west region, that is the whole of Cornwall and the western part of Devon. The total money involved was

    £ million
    1980 (paid in 1981)1981 (paid in 1982)1982 (paid in 1983)
    Roads programme0·36·4
    Rail programme3·70·6
    Electricity2·0
    Water & sewerage5·37·63·9
    Telecommunications13·812·85·1
    Total22·822·716·0
    Most of these programmes covered a large number of small projects and it is not possible to allocate them between Devon and Cornwall. Two projects in Cornwall which did receive specific support from the 1980 and 1981 refunds were the St. Neots-Colliford impounding reservoir and the Camborne-Redruth main drainage scheme.Arrangements for refunds in respect of 1983 were different, and the payments were all allocated to individual projects. Those in the Devon and Cornwall area which received support were work on the M5 near Tiverton (Devon) (£4·7 million) and work on the A38 at the Tamar bridge (£10·8 million).

    Westland Plc

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he has had any discussions with the Governor of the Bank of England regarding the role of the bank in the financial restructuring of Westland plc; and if he will make a statement.

    Council House Sales

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will introduce legislation to permit private developers involved in the refurbishment or redevelopment for sale of local authority housing to pass on value added tax invoices to the local housing authority for recovery of the tax; and if he will make a statement.

    Budget

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many representations he has received about his forthcoming Budget.

    £ billion
    Customs and Excise duties
    Personal income taxValue added taxOtherLocal authority ratesOther taxes (including royalties)Miscellaneous incomePublic sector borrowing requirement
    1979–8020·910·110·06·912·816·410·0
    1980–8124·911·810·98·714·919·612·7
    1981–8228·613·513·311·019·222·38·6
    1982–8330·414·514·412·220·425·18·9
    1983–8431·316·115·912·321·327·69·7
    1984–8532·618·317·013·024·529·710·1

    Spirits (Excise Duty)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his latest forecast of receipts from excise duty on spirits in 1985–86; and how much of this figure is attributable to the change in the rate of duty in the Finance Act 1985.

    I have nothing further to add to the reply I gave my hon. Friend on 20 December 1985, at column 361.

    Savings Schemes (Advertising)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the amount of money spent on advertising each of the different Government savings schemes together with a table of the interest paid on capital for each scheme.

    Revenue

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish the estimated total yield of (a) income tax, (b) value added tax, (c) all other taxes, (d) all Customs and Excise duties, (e) all miscellaneous income to the Exchequer (other than borrowing), (f) public sector borrowing and (g) rates in each year from 1979–80 to 1985–86.

    Customs Officers (Drug Enforcement)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many Customs officers were permanently assigned to drug enforcement duties at the latest available date; and how many were so assigned (a) five and (b) 10 years ago.

    The number of Customs investigators and preventive staff will be 3,262 at 31 March 1986; five years ago it was 3,179; the figure for 10 years ago is not available. Within these totals, effectiveness has been increased by shifting resources to specialist drugs investigation, where numbers have more than doubled, and to mobile and other specialised units supported by improved training and equipment.A further 300 preventive officers are being appointed in the course of 1986–87, and £10 million is being made available for the development and purchase of drugs detection equipment over the next three years.