Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 98: debated on Thursday 5 June 1986

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Thursday 5 June 1986

Scotland

Residential Homes

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people are at present resident in local authority homes; what was the comparable figure in 1979; and what is the present average occupancy of such residences.

On 31 March 1985, the latest date for which information is available, the number of residents in local authority homes was as follows:

19791985Occupancy Rate 1985 per cent.
Elderly8,7458,98592
Children2,6591,72073
Mentally handicapped50672592
Mentally ill11712971
Other5459
Total12,02711,61388

Nhs (Land Sales)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the income to the Health Service in Scotland from the sale of land and properties owned by health authorities during each of the past five years.

Income from the sale of surplus NHS land and property is as follows:

£ million
1981–820·454
1982–831·791
1983–841·750
1984–851·889
1985–862·432

Burglaries

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many Scottish homes have reported burglaries in each of the past 10 years.

The available information relates to cases of housebreaking, in both residential and commercial property, recorded by the police, and is as follows:

Cases of housebreaking recorded by the police—Scotland
Number
197679,820
197791,150
197875,710
197976,635
198078,446

Number

198195,681
1982106,271
1983108,520
1984112,104
1985100,698

Benefits (Crimes)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people in Scotland in each of the past 10 years have been convicted of crimes related to the claiming of supplementary or unemployment benefit.

I regret that the information is not maintained in the form requested. The information that is available is set out in the table.

Persons against whom charges were proved Social Security and Supplementary Benefits Offences
Number
1976583
1977593
19781,108
1979774
19801,518
1981981
1982498
1983317
1984419
1985463

Haemophiliacs

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how much money the Scottish Office makes available to centres run by health authorities in Scotland at which haemophiliacs are treated and supported in counselling centres.

No specific funds have been made available for this purpose. It is for individual health boards to decide on the allocation of their resources, according to their priorities and their knowledge of local needs.

Social Services (Expenditure)

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the amount spent in Scotland per head on personal social services in the last year for which figures are available; and what are the comparable figures for (a) England and Wales and (b) each of the English and Welsh regions.

The last financial year for which relevant figures are available for Scotland and Wales is 1984–85 and for England 1983–84. In 1984–85 the gross amount per head of the population spent in Scotland by local authorities in the discharge of the responsibilities arising directly from the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968 or referred to therein was £63. The equivalent figure for Wales is £55. 1983–84 figures for Scotland, Wales and England and for areas in England corresponding approximately to those of regional health authorities are as follows:

Approximate Gross Amount Spent per Head on Personal Social Services in 1983–84 (rounded to the nearest £)

England (by regions)

£

Northern55
Yorkshire49
Trent50
East Anglia37
North West Thames68
North East Thames75
South East Thames68
South West Thames51
Wessex37
Oxford40
South Western42
West Midlands45
Mersey53
North Western57
Average for England53
Wales53
Scotland59

The figures are not directly comparable relating to Scotland include expenditure on other services for offenders which are as i the social work programme for Scotland but and Wales.

Commonwealth Games

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish the exchange of letters between himself and the chairman of the Commonwealth Games Committee regarding the anticipated shortfall in financing the Commonwealth Games in Edinburgh: and if he will make a statement.

No. The chairman of the Commonwealth Games Organising Committee and I agree that our correspondence is confidential. I am confident that the Edinburgh Games will be a resounding success.

Fishing Vessels

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what is his estimate of the numbers of British fishing vessels engaged in monofilament net fishing in (a) North sea fishing grounds north of the Scottish border and (b) Scottish waters in each of the last three years: and what is his estimate of the value and volume of the catch landed in Scotland from such vessels.

Transport Grants

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what arrangements he proposes for the operation in Scotland of the grants provided for by section 108 of the Transport Act 1985; and if he will make a statement.

I have provided £170,000 for these grants in 1986/87. The grant scheme will be used to assist in the establishment, continuance or improvement of any public passenger transport project for the benefit of persons residing in rural areas of Scotland. The particular conditions of the scheme, which has been established after consultation with local authorities and interested organisations, are set out in the explanatory note which accompanies application forms. I have placed copies in the Library of the House.

Energy

Coal Prices

asked the Secretary of State for Energy whether he is now in a position to make a statement on the agreement on coal prices reached between the Central Electricity Generating Board and the National Coal Board.

The Government have encouraged British Coal and the CEGB in their efforts to reach a commercial agreement covering the supply of coal, which takes due account of the recent fall in the price of oil. I am pleased to be able to announce that agreement has been reached. The agreement is firm for the first two years, from 1 April 1986, and it is the clear intention of the industries to continue it for a further three years. In the first year it will result in a reduction of some £300 million in the cost of coal to the CEGB and there will be a similar decrease in the second year. The Government have endorsed the agreement during the first two years when it is firm.Electricity prices will fall as a result of this agreement. The Electricity Council is today recommending to the area boards an immediate reduction. I understand that this will mean a reduction of some 3·5 per cent. on the unit rate, with consumers on Economy 7 benefiting even more. The average reduction for industrial consumers is likely to be 5 per cent. (7 per cent. to 8 per cent. for those on contracted load terms). Monthly-billed industrial and commercial consumers will begin to benefit at once as a result of the fuel price adjustment clause in their tariff. The area boards expect to announce shortly the reduction in their prices to quarterly-billed, including domestic, consumers.

Euratom Budget

asked the Secretary of State for Energy how much of the current Euratom budget is allocated to (a) promoting nuclear energy and (b) safety.

There is no seperate Euratom budget. Community research into nuclear fission is funded through the overall Community budget. Some 80 per cent. of the current nuclear fission programme of around £275 million is safety-related with sub-programmes on reactor safety, the management and storage of radioactive waste and the safeguarding of fissile materials. The remainder of the programme is devoted to research into nuclear fuels and decommissioning of nuclear installations. Euratom does not devote resources to promoting nuclear energy.

Electricity Industry (Investment Capital)

asked the Secretary of State for Energy (1) if he will give the latest available information held by his Department on the comparative availability of investment capital for Electricite de France in France and the Central Electricity Generating Board's external financing limits;

(2) if he will set out his Department's latest information on the size and composition of Electricité de France's investment debt arising from the French nuclear energy programme's reactor construction schedule.

The CEGB conducts its capital investment in accordance with a programme for which it is required to obtain my right hon. Friend's approval. My right hon. Friend has agreed that the board may spend £640 million on its capital programme in 1986/87. I cannot comment on the comparative availability of investment capital for Electricité de France or on the size of its debts.

Nuclear Power

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will list those categories of questions on civil nuclear power and nuclear materials that are matters to be raised directly with the appropriate chairman of the Central Electricity Generating Board and the South of Scotland Electricity Board.

Questions which relate specifically to matters within the management competence of the Central Electricity Generating Board or the South of Scotland Electricity Board, or where the answer requires detailed information not available in my Department or in the Scottish Office, are normally referred to the chairman of the board concerned.

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will give details of how he calculated the stated figure of a £1 billion advantage to French industry of its nuclear energy programme.

A reduction in the proportion of nuclear generation in the French electricity system from the present 65 per cent. to the 20 per cent. in Britain would add approximately 0.5p to the cost of a kilowatt hour of French electricity. This is broadly the difference between French and United Kingdom industrial electricity tariffs as detailed in the CBI report on "European Industrial Energy Prices" published in February 1985. When multiplied by electricity consumption in French industrial and commercial concerns, this yields a saving close to £1 billion.

National Finance

Review Board For Government Contracts

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the outcome of the report on the second annual review by the Review Board for Government Contracts.

The review board in its report on the fouth general review proposed that the triennial reviews of the target profit rate should be supplemented by limited annual reviews so that changes in the rate of return elsewhere in the economy and in other economic circumstances can be reflected more quickly in the profit rate. The review board submitted the second of these interim reviews to the Treasury in January.The board recommended that the target rate of profit should be 13 per cent. on capital employed in semi-CCA terms, with an assumed average CP/CE ratio of 2·40 to 1. The semi-CCA basis of the profit formula allows for historic cost figures to be adjusted by the inclusion of current cost based depreciation and fixed asset values; and the average cost of production to capital employed (CP/CE) ratio is used in determining the components of the profit formula applicable to risk and non-risk work (that is the rates of return allowed on capital employed and cost).In its first annual review the board found that, although there were not sufficient data to support the view that Government profit formula work generally required less capital than contractors' other work, there were some significant divergences in individual cases arising almost entirely from a small number of large and exceptional projects, both defence and non-defence. The board recommended that these divergences should be addressed by negotiating more relevant units for the calculation of contractors' individual CP/CE ratios rather than by adjusting the target rate of return in the profit formula. To avoid distortion by the exceptional projects until more relevant units are established and start to affect negotiations on individual CP/CE ratios, the board has again recommended, in its second annual review, that a transitional adjustment should be made to the average CP/CE ratio. Specifically, the board recommended that the observed ratio of 2·32 to 1 should be increased to 2·40 to 1.Progress has been made with the introduction of more relevant units, but it is not certain that this action alone will eliminate the exceptional problems reported by the board. The Government and industry have therefore asked the board to conduct a further study of capital employed as part of the fifth general review which will take place later this year. Meanwhile, it is essential that the overstatement of capital employed already identified by the board should be reflected in the profit formula. Accordingly, after careful consideration, and following representations from industry, the Government have decided to leave unchanged the formula introduced on 1 May 1985. The target rate of profit will therefore remain at 12 per cent. on capital employed on a semi-CCA basis, and the components of the profit formula applicable to risk and non-risk work will also be unchanged.Copies of the review board report have been placed in the Library.

Sick Leave

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his latest estimate of the cost of sick leave in the public sector; and what would be the public expenditure savings if public sector employees were restricted to statutory sick pay, instead of the present arrangements.

The information sought by the hon. Member is not held centrally and I regret that this information cannot be provided without a disproportionate expenditure of time and resources.

Public Expenditure

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will give details of total public expenditure, at current prices and real prices, using 1979 as 100, for each of the years 1978–79 to 1985–86.

The public expenditure planning total figures expressed in current prices and in real terms, using 1978–89 as 100, are as follows:

Current prices

Real terms*

1978–79100100
1979–80118101
1980–81141102
1981–82158104
1982–83172106
1983–84183107
1984–85197111
1985–86204108

* Cash figures adjusted for general inflation as measured by the GDP deflator at market prices.

Eastern Bloc Imports

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the reply, 22 May, Official Report, columns 306–7, what information he has about the nature of the cargoes imported from Europe and the Eastern bloc for each of the ports of entry in Scotland.

National Insurance Contributions

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the additional cost in 1986–87 of income tax relief for class 4 National Insurance contributions if the upper annual limit were abolished.

Data Protection

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many registrations his Department has made under the Data Protection Act; how many people are involved with implementing the legislation in his Department as a significant part of their job description; and how much he estimates it will cost to conform with the eight data protection principles.

The Treasury made three registrations under the Data Protection Act. There are four people involved with implementing the legislation within the Department. The majority of the data protection principles echo good practice and were adhered to by the Treasury prior to the introduction of the Act. The only principle likely to cause extra cost in future is principle 7, referring to subject access. The Treasury does not envisage any significant expenditure on this, as most of the subjects are members of staff who see the information held on them as a matter of course.

Government Departments (Staff)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the number of staff in post in central Government Departments at 1 April 1986.

At 1 April 1986 there were 594,365 staff in post — 498,223 non-industrials and 96,142 industrials. The number of Civil Servants has fallen by 137,910, or 18.8 per cent, since 1 April 1979.

Transport

Plutonium (Liverpool-Dounreay)

asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on the flying of plutonium fuel from Liverpool to Dounreay.

These shipments are made in full compliance with the national and international safety regulations, which require the containers to be so designed as to prevent any harmful effect, due to radioactive contents, even in event of a serious accident.

Stats 19 System

asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether, in view of the current difficulties in extracting separate accident information from the national data base on minibuses, coaches and public service vehicles he will make the necessary arrangements to amend the STATS 19 system accordingly.

The STATS 19 system is currently under review and this is one of the aspects under consideration.

Fishing Vessels

asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many Spanish fishing vessels have been registered as United Kingdom vessels in each year since 1980; and how many are currently on the United Kingdom registry.

The numbers of fishing vessels previously registered in Spain, and subsequently registered in the United Kingdom following their transfer to United Kingdom registered companies in which there is a controlling Spanish interest, in each year since 1980, have been:

Number
19804
198120
198224
19831
1984
19852
Eleven of these vessels were subsequently removed from the United Kingdom register, but seven were later reregistered. In this period, too, a further 17 United Kingdom registered fishing vessels, not previously registered in Spain, were acquired by United Kingdom registered companies in which the controlling shareholding is Spanish. Eight of these vessels have since been removed from the United Kingdom register. Thus a total of 56 fishing vessels that are owned by United Kingdom registered companies with controlling Spanish shareholdings are currently on the United Kingdom register.

asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he has proposals for legislation to confine British registration to fishing vessels beneficially owned in the United Kingdom.

My Department is considering this difficult problem, in consultation with representatives of the fishing industry and the Departments that are directly concerned with fisheries matters. I shall consider what legislation might be appropriate in the light of the recommendations that are put to me.

Education And Science

Public Expenditure

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what proportion of gross domestic product has been spent on the education budget in each year since 1970.

The following table shows total public spending on education expressed as a percentage of the gross domestic product from 1970–71 to 1983–84.

United Kingdom—Financial Years
Per cent.
1970–715·2
1971–725·3
1972–735·5
1973–745·7
1974–756·2
1975–766·3.
1976–776·0
1977–785·5
1978–795·3
1979–805·1
1980–815·4
1981–825·4
1982–835·3
1983–845·2

Local Authorities (Capital Expenditure)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what has been the level of local authority expenditure on education in each year since 1976 in cash and constant 1985–86 prices.

The information requested is shown in the table.

Local authority capital expenditure on education
£ millions
Financial yearCash termsConstant† 1985–86 prices
England and Wales*
1970–71273·31,391·0
1971–72327·61,526·1
1972–73398·21,719·0
1973–74473·51,907·3
1974–75437·81,477·6
1975–76477·51,282·1
England
1976–77433·81,029·3
1977–78375·8783·1
1978–79349·7658·7
1979–80394·0635·0
1980–81495·2671·9
1981–82406·4501·4
1982–83446·8515·2
1983–84461·1509·0
1984–85465·1493·0
* For the years prior to 1976–77 figures for England alone are not available.
† Calculated using the gross domestic product (market prices) deflators.

Environment

Trading Accounts

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will place a copy of the Peat Marwick report in April 1985, "Ordnance Survey: Review of the Format and Design of Trading Accounts" in the Library.

On 23 April last year my hon. Friend the then Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State announced that an Executive summary of the Peat Marwick Mitchell report had been placed in the Library. The summary was prepared because the full report contained some information that is classified as commercial in confidence. The summary includes all recommendations of the full report.

Listed Buildings

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has received any recent representations concerning a possible removal of ecclesiastical exemption for listed buildings; and if he will make a statement.

Discussions continue with church bodies and some other interested organisations. My right hon. Friend will make a statement when it becomes appropriate to do so.

Ordnance Survey

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how he monitors the commercial activities of the Ordnance Survey; and if he will make a statement.

The Ordnance Survey management board monitors these activities against a financial target set by the Government. In addition, I also have regular meetings with the director general to discuss overall departmental performance.

Local Government Finance

asked the Secretary of State for- the Environment if he will increase the grant-related expenditure assessments and provide additional rate support grant to boroughs and districts in order to facilitate greater expenditure on litter prevention, street cleaning, refuse collection, disposal and amenity services.

I believe that local authorities are receiving fully adequate support from the Government through the grant-related expenditure and block grant arrangements to allow them to undertake all their services for 1986–87, including litter prevention, street cleaning, refuse collection, disposal and amenity services.Consultations with the local authority association; on the level of relevant expenditure for all local government services, including environmental services, for 1.987–88 are currently in progress.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will state the total amount to date which has been withheld from (a) all local authorities, (b) local authorities in the northern region and (c) the borough of Sunderland in the form of penalties which were imposed on councils for spending in excess of required amounts.

[pursuant to her reply, 3 June 1986]: The following are the amounts of grant holdback incurred by local authorities in England, in the northern region, and by the borough of Sunderland for the years 1981–82 to 1985–86; that is those years for which expenditure guidance and holdback of grant are applicable.

England £ mllionNorthern region £ millionSunderland £ milllion
1981–82123·00017·0232·206
1982–83232·00028·2463·303
1983–84281·00050·2043·614
1984–85276·02026·2572·938
1985–86435·35974·3019·939
Figures for 1981–82 and 1982–83 are final entitlements; figures for 1983–84 onwards are latest estimates in the relevant supplementary rate support grant reports.Northern region includes local authorities in the counties of Cleveland, Durham, Northumberland and Tyne and Wear.

National Clean-Up Scheme

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what consultations have taken place or are proposed between his Department and the local authority associations and organisations representing the voluntary sector about the national clean-up scheme;(2) if he will make a statement giving details of the national clean-up scheme;(3) if he will list those organisations consulted before Mr. Richard Branson was invited to chair the national clean-up scheme; what resources are being made available to the campaign; and from what areas they have been transferred.

I expect to make an announcement about the details of the scheme shortly.

BoroughEstateTargetted UHRU HIP allocation £Description of works
HaringeyBroadwater Farm (1,063 dwellings)505,000Security and anti-vandal measures; refurbishment of community facilities; environmental improvements.
HaringeyTiverton (938 dwellings)515,000Security measures; provision of neighbourhood office.
WandsworthDoddington (964 dwellings)1,609,000Physical restructuring; provision of 183 dwellings for sale; refurbishment and provision of community rooms; environmental and security improvements.
NottinghamRadford and Clifton flats (525 dwellings)238,000Security and anti-vandal measures.
NewcastleMcCutcheons Court (200 dwellings)285,000Security measures; provision of community facilities and estate office; environmental improvements.
These five schemes bring the total number of schemes so far approved in principle to 23 with UHRU targetted HIP resources of £12·137 million.

Trade And Industry

Bsc (Industry) Ltd

asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many jobs have been created in the northern

Conservation Orders

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what measures he proposes to take pursuant to recommendation 12 of the first report from the House of Commons Environment Committee, Session 1984–85.

The Government's reply to that report (Cmnd. 9522) indicated that further consideration would be given to the introduction of legislation to enable national park authorities to apply for landscape conservation orders to be made as a power of last resort. We now propose, as an essential step in this process, to publish a consultation paper later this year to seek public views. The paper will include the details of a possible approach to an order-making scheme, and will set out the circumstances in which the Government believe that legislation for this purpose might be justified.

Housing

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he will be approving any further proposals submitted to his urban housing renewal unit; and if he will make a statement.

I am pleased to announce my right hon. Friend's favourable response to proposals for a further five schemes submitted by the London boroughs of Haringey and Wandsworth, Nottingham city council and Newcastle city council. All these schemes, which have been worked up in close collaboration with the Department's urban housing renewal unit and regional offices, involve improved housing management from local estate-based offices.The estates which will benefit from today's decisions and resources to be made available in 1986–87, which have been agreed in principle, are:region by BSC (Industry) Ltd. in each year since it was established; and how many are expected to be created in the current year.

The information is not available in the form requested. I shall write to my hon. Friend when I have the information.

Shipbuilding Intervention Fund

asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry to which corporation or companies payments have been made from the shipbuilding intervention fund in each of the last three years.

Companies to which payments were made from the shipbuilding intervention fund between:

1 April 1983—31 March 1984

  • Appledore Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Austin & Pickersgill Ltd.
  • Clelands Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Cochrane Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Cubow Ltd.
  • Ferguson-Ailsa Ltd.
  • Goole Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Govan Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Henry Robb Ltd.
  • McTay Marine Ltd.
  • Richard Dunston (Hessle) Ltd.
  • Richards (Shipbuilders) Ltd.
  • Scott Lithgow Ltd.
  • Smiths' Dock Ltd.
  • Sunderland Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Swan Hunter Shipbuilders Ltd.

(ii) 1 April 1984—31 March 1985

  • Appledore Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Austin & Pickersgill Ltd.
  • Cleland Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Cochrane Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Ferguson-Ailsa Ltd.
  • Goole Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Govan Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • McTay Marine Ltd.
  • Richard Dunston (Hessle) Ltd.
  • Richards (Shipbuilders) Ltd.
  • Smiths' Dock Ltd.
  • Sunderland Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Swan Hunter Shipbuilders Ltd.

1 April 1985–31 March 1986

  • Appledore Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Austin & Pickersgill Ltd.
  • Cochrane Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Ferguson-Ailsa Ltd.
  • Govan Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • James W. Cook & Co. (Wivenhoe) Ltd.
  • McTay Marine Ltd.
  • Richard Dunston (Hessle) Ltd.
  • Richards (Shipbuilders) Ltd.
  • Smiths' Dock Ltd.
  • Sunderland Shipbuilders Ltd.
  • Swan Hunter Shipbuilders Ltd.

Competition Policy

asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what plans he has to review competition policy; and if he will make a statement.

The Government believe that in general existing competition law has operated effectively and served the economy well. However, mergers policy has attracted attention in recent months, particularly in the light of the present high level of merger activity. In addition, the restrictive trade practices legislation has now been in operation for 30 years, and it has been criticised on a number of grounds, such as its inflexibility and its limited effectiveness in controlling seriously anti-competitive agreements between firms. I therefore believe it would now be right to undertake a review of these areas. The review will investigate both the scope for changes in policy under existing legislation and the desirability of changes in the law.I am anxious that the review should be open to wide public debate and should benefit from all the expert knowledge available, whether inside or outside Government. I therefore intend to invite a number of outside experts to act as consultants on particular issues. In addition, I invite all interested organisations and individuals to contribute their view in writing, in the first instance no later than the end of July.I shall keep the House informed as conclusions are reached.

Bsc And Bs (Grants And Loans)

asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what estimate he has of the total amount of aid in grants and loans provided to (a) the British Steel Corporation and (b) British Shipbuilders in respect of their operations in the northern region (i) since 1979 and (ii) since 1983.

[pursuant to his reply, 3 June 1986, c. 406]: The following is the information for British Shipbuilders in the northern region and the British Steel Corporation in the north-east. Information from British Steel Corporation in Cumbria is not readily available.

1979–80 to 1984–851983–84 to 1984–85
£ million£ million
British Shipbuilders
Regional Development Grants92·5
Intervention Fund*12320
Public Dividend Capital†374160
British Steel Corporation
Regional Development Grants2511
Subscription of Capital†455112
* To May 1986.
† Estimated: public dividend capital for British Shipbuilders (provided under section 16 of the Aircraft and Shipbuilding Regulations 1977) and capital subscribed for the British Steel Corporation (under section 18 of the Iron and Steel Acts 1975 and 1982) is general finance, for instance, for capital investment and operating losses in subsidiary companies. It is not, in the main, allocated for specific purposes or areas. The British Shipbuilders public dividend capital estimate does, however, include £58 million towards the construction of the submarine facilities project at Vickers Shipbuilding and Engineering Ltd. at Barrow.
Other funding for working capital and to meet redundancy and closure costs has been provided by British Shipbuilders and British Steel Corporation in the northern region, but is not recorded on a regional basis.

Social Services

Child Benefit

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if child benefit will be regarded as income for the purpose of calculating family credit under the terms of the Social Security Bill.

The intention is that child benefit will be taken into account in setting the level of the child credit rates, and it will therefore not be counted as income in the calculation of family credit in individual cases.

Oriel Lodge, Sudbury

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what information he has on the circumstances surrounding the closure of Oriel Lodge Sudbury; and if he will make a statement.

The Registered Homes Act 1984 places responsibility for registering and inspecting residential care homes on local social services authorities. I would suggest therefore that my hon. Friend pursues his inquiries about the situation at Oriel Lodge with the Suffolk county council.

Residential Homes

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will introduce a system of minimum and maximum charges for the provision of services by private residential care homes and nursing homes: and if he will make a statement.

No. Provided that services and facilities appropriate to the care the resident or patient needs are available, the type of accommodation that is occupied and the charges paid are a matter between those running the homes and the person, or his relatives meeting the charges. The charges could be expected to reflect the services and facilities available as determined by market forces.

Students (Benefits)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when he will publish his Department's response to the Social Security Advisory Committee's report on the Social Security White Paper's proposals on student entitlement to social security and housing benefit.

I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Denton and Reddish (Mr. Bennett) on 3 June, at column 718.

National Insurance Contributions

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what would be the increased revenue from class 1, 2 and 4 national insurance contributions in a full year at the rates ruling in 1986–87 resulting from the abolition of the upper earnings limit for employee contributions and of the annual upper limit for class 4 contributions.

Benefits (Foreign Nationals)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services under what conditions foreign nationals are entitled to supplementary benefit or unemployment benefit.

Foreign nationals living in Great Britain who have paid the relevant contributions are entitled to unemployment benefit subject to the normal rules. Some foreign nationals are helped to qualify under the European social security regulations and the reciprocal arrangements on social security with certain other countries. Supplementary benefit has no residence, nationality or contribution test and the entitlement of foreign nationals is dependent upon their immigration status.

Benefits (Fraud)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is his best estimate of the numbers drawing unemployment or supplementary benefit who are also working without disclosing their work.

It is a criminal offence for any claimant to draw unemployment benefit or supplementary benefit without declaring that he is working. In 1981, in his report on payments of benefits to unemployed people, Sir Derek Rayner estimated that a minimum of around 8 per cent. of claimants are working while claiming benefit. The Department is making substantial efforts to reduce the level of fraud in this area and the Secretary of State has recently announced the allocation of 500 additional fraud staff to augment the Department's overall anti-fraud effort.

Alcohol Abuse

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will provide figures indicating the amount of Government grant given to agencies working to combat alcohol abuse for the years 1980–1985 inclusive.

[pursuant to his reply, 26 February 1986. c. 604]: I regret that my reply to my hon. Friend understated the amounts of Government grant made available. The corrected information is as follows:

£
1980–811,245,018
1981–82927,821
1982–83899,221
1983–84908,908
1984–85795,379
1985–86*825,876
* Estimated figure.

Nhs (General Services)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if, in the manner of the answer to the hon. Member for Norfolk, North of 21 December 1984, at columns 412–14, he will provide figures for expenditure by the family practitioner services, the Dental Estimates Board, the Prescription Pricing Authority and other special health authorities providing National Health Service central services for 1983–84; and if he will also publish comparable figures, at current and at 1983–84 prices, and comparable percentages for 1960 and 1970, for the above categories and those in the original answer.

[pursuant to his reply, 15 May 1986, c. 533]: The figures for 1983–84, and those for the earlier years at 1983–84 prices, were given in my predecessor's reply to my hon. Friend on 19 March 1985, at columns 452–58. I assume that my hon. Friend requires the equivalent information for 1984–85. This is given in the tables.The figures for 1960–61 and 1970–71 at 1984–85 prices are calculated from the base year's figures by adjusting for general inflation as measured by the gross domestic product deflator at market prices.Comparisons over this long period cannot be entirely reliable because of changes in the structure of GDP and in the organisation of the National Health Service.

Table 1

Current expenditure by health authorities analysed subjectively (ie by type)

1960–61

1970–71

1984–85

From annual accounts

At 1984–85 prices

Proportion of total

From annual accounts

At 1984–85 prices

Proportion of total

From annual accounts

Proportion of total

£ million

£ million

Per cent.

£ million

£ million

Per cent.

£ million

Per cent.

PAY
NHS Staff salaries and wagesn.a.n.a.6,697·973·32
Non-NHS staff (Agency etc.)78·50·86
Chairmen's remuneration2·00·02
Total286·22,101·669·23706·03,390·374·496,778·474·20
NON-PAY
Drugs14·8108·73·5827·4131·62·89278·83·05
Medical Gases10·90·12
Dressings6·229·80·6550·00·55
Medical and surgical equipment—purchases and maintenance contracts16·4120·43·9743·4208·44·58306·03·35
X-Ray equipment, film and materials— purchases and maintenance contracts51·60·57
Patients' appliances63·00·69
Laboratory equipment, instruments and materials—purchases and maintenance contracts and services80·60·88
Provisions—purchases and contract catering37·5275·59·0846·0220·94·85178·01·95
Staff uniforms and patients clothing3·626·40·876·832·60·7244·50·49
Fuel, light and power29·4215·917·142·1202·24·44301·73·30
Laundry-equipment, materials and contracts12·70·14
Cleaning-equipment, materials and contracts39·40·43
Engineering maintenance-equipment, materials and contracts24·5179·95·9238·6185·44·7110·31·21
Building maintenance-equipment, materials and contracts91·81·00
Grounds and Gardens maintenance-equipment materials and contracts5·80·06
Computers—purchases, maintenance and licencing fees5·943·31·4315·072·01·5821·90·24
Office equipment31·10·34
Printing, stationery and postage70·60·77
Telephone-rental etc. and call charges70·20·77
Transport—fuel and oil. maintenance-equipment, materials and contracts etc.2·014·70·484·722·60·5053·70·59
Travelling, subsistence and removal expenses1·410·30·342·813·40·29152·81·67
Rates6·245·51·5014·167·71·49137·01·50
Rent22·00·24
Contractual arrangements for patient care2·921·30·705·024·00·5339·50·43
Other expenses11·282·22·7119·493·22·05311·13·41
Total155·81,144·137·69271·51,303·828·642,535·027·75
Total Pay and Non-Pay442·03,245·7106·92977·54,694·1103·139,313·4101·95
Less direct credits (Staff lodging charges, canteen and other sales etc.)(28·6)(210·0)(6·92)(29·7)(142·6)(3·13)(178·5)(1·95)
Total413·43,035·7100·00947·84,551·5100·009,134·9100·00

Notes to table 1

1. The figures for 1960–61 and 1970–71 do not include expenditure on community health and ambulance services which prior to NHS re-organisation on 1 April 1974 were the responsibility of local government authorities.
2. The administrative expenses of executive councils which were responsible for the administration of family practitioner services are included in the table as such costs are reflected in the annual accounts of health authorities from 1974–75. For 1960–61 an apportionment of composite England and Wales figures was necessary to derive figures for England only.
3. For years prior to 1974–75 the analyses of expenditure by type provided by the annual accounts are less detailed than those for later years.
4. "Other expenses" for 1960–61 and 1970–71 includes the total non-pay expenditure on the blood transfusion and mass radiography services for which component details are not readily available—£1·0 million 1960–61 and £1·8 million 1970–71 (£7·3 million ad £8·6 million at 1984–85 prices).
5. Total capital expenditure by the authorities whose current expenditure is included in the table was £25·1 million in 1960–61, £119·2 million in 1970–71 (£184·3 million and £572·4 million at 1984–85 prices) and £795·4 million in 1984–85.

Table 2

Expenditure of family practitioner services

1960–61

1970–71

1984–85

From annual accounts

At 1984–85 prices

Proportion of total per cent.

From annual accounts

At 1984–85 prices

Proportion of total per cent.

From annual accounts

Proportion of total per cent.

£ million

£ million

£ million

£ million

£ million

A. General medical services
1. Payments to general mecial practitioners
a. Basic practice allowance and additions38·4184·49·50232·17·59
b. Standard capitation fees66·0316·916·34334·210·94
c. Payments or our of hours responsibilities79·4583·138·9411·555·22·8575·12·46
d. Direct payment for practice accommodation and ancillary staff11·454·82·82165·95·43
e. Other payments, fees and allowances14·569·63·59137·04·48
2. Superanuation contributions (authorities share)4·936·02·407·134·11·7638·61·26
3. Payments to contractors for disposable sterile syringes0·21·00·051·00·03
Total84·36·19·141·34149·1716·036·91983·932·19
B Pharmaceutical services
1. Supply and dispensing of drugs and appliances by pharmacists75·3552·936·93167·8805·841·541,434·446·93
Less charges to patients (retained by pharmacists)(10·8)(79·3)(5·30)(14·3)(68·7)(3·54)(104·3)(3·41).
2. Supply and dispensing of drugs and appliances by medical and dental practitioners2·518·41·238·440·42·08113·23·70
3. Bacic practice allowance20·40·67
4. Superannuation contributions (authorities' share)0·10·70·050·31·40·071·00·03
5. Other expenditure0·32·20·153·90·13
Total67·4494·933·06162·2778·940·151,468·648·05
C. General dental services
1. Fees to dental practitioners49·5363·524·2790·0432·222·28624·720·44
Less charges to patients (retained by dentists)(9·0)(66·1)(4·41)(16·2)(77·8)(4·01)(173·5)(5·68)
2. Salaries of dental practitioners practising at health centres, etc.0·10·70·050·10·50·021·20·04
3. Superannuation contributions (authorities' share)1·914·00·933·215·40·7919·20·63
4. Other expenditure1·10·04
Total42·5312·120·8477·1370·319·08472·715·47
D. General opthalmic services
1. Fees for sight testing4·734·52·318·942·72·2082·32·69
2. Supply and repair of glasses10·274·95·0016·981·24·1892·73·4
Less charges to patients (retained by opticians)(5·2)(38·2)(2·55)(10·2)(49·0)(2·52)(44·9)(1·47)
3. Superannuation contributions (authorities' share)0·30·01
4. Other expenditure0·60·22
Total9·771·24·7615·674·93·86131·04·29
Total expenditure on family practitioner services203·91,497·3100·00404·01,940·1100·003,056·2100·00

Notes to Table 2

1. The table shows payments made to doctors, pharmacists, dentists, opticians and others contracted to the NHS to provide family practitioner services (FPS).
2. Annual accounts of health authorities (and their predecessor executive councils) provide one analysis only of such expenditure which assigns it functionally to service.
3. The table shows 1960–61 and 1970–71 FPS expenditure categorised as far as practicable in the same format as that of the annual white papers on the summarised accounts of health authorities since 1974–75. Thus, charges to patients retained by pharmacists, dentists and opticians are reflected in the table but other items of FPS income collected by health authorities (or executive councils) such as charges to patients for dental treatment at heath centres and receipts from the sale of prescription charge pre-payment certificates, are excluded.
4. For 1960–61 the accounts provide separate services totals for England and similar totals for Wales with detailed analyses of only the composite England and Wales totals. It has therefore been necessary to derive the detailed figures for England prorata.
5. All spending on FPS is regarded as current expenditure. Some relatively insignificant costs strictly of a capital nature (relating only to certain payments made to general medical practitioners for practice accommodation) are however included.

Table 3

Expenditure by the Dental Estimates Board, the Prescription Pricing Authority and other special health authorities providing NHS central services

1960–61

1970–71

1984–85

From annual accounts

At 1984–85 prices

Proportion of total

From annual accounts

At 1984–85 prices

Proportion of total

From annual accounts

Proportion of total

£ million

£ million

Per cent.

£ million

£ million

Per cent.

£ million

Per cent.

1. Expenditure by the Dental Estimates Board

(a) Salaries and wages

0·75·187·501·99·173·0810·790·68

(b) Non-pay

0·10·712·500·73·426·921·19·32
Total0·85·8100·002·612·5100·0011·8100·00
2. Expenditure by the Prescription Pricing Authority

(a) Salaries and wages

0·75·187·501·67·788·8912·0087·59

(b) Non-pay

0·10·712·500·21·011·111·712·41
Total0·85·8100·001·88·7100·0013·7100·00

1960–61

1970–71

1984–85

From annual accounts

At 1984–85 prices

Proportion of total

From annual accounts

At 1984–85 prices

Proportion of total

From annual accounts

Proportion of total

£ million

£ million

Per cent.

£ million

£ million

Per cent.

£ million

Per cent.

3. Expenditure by other special health authorities providing NHS central services

(a) Salaries and wages

n/an/a4·735·61

(b) Non-pay

n/an/a8·564·39
Totaln/an/a13·2100·00

Notes to table 3

1. The table shows summaries of the detailed accounts of the Dental Estimates Board (DEB), the Prescription Pricing Authority (PPA) and its predecessor Joint Pricing Committee for England (JPC); together with a composite summary of the accounts for 1984–85 only of other special health authorities providing NHS central services.
2. (a) Other special health authorities providing NHS central services comprise:
(i) the Central Blood Laboratories Authority (CBLA)—established 1 December 1982.
(ii) the Mental Health Act Commission—established 1 September 1983.
(iii) the Rampton Hospital Review Board—established 11 June 1981.
(iv) the Rural Dispensing Committee—established 1 April 1983.
(v) the National Health Service Training Authority—established 1 October 1983.

(b) The expenses of the Health Service Supply Council (established on 14 July 1980) which are met in full from charges made to regional health authorities are excluded.

(c) The functions of all these special health authorities are either new or were devolved by the Department and comparable figures for 1960–61 and 1970–71 are consequently not available.

3. Capital expenditure by the DEB and the JPC was not separately identifiable and is included in the totals for 1960–61 and 1970–71. The amounts are known to be insignificant except that there was substantial capital expenditure by the DEB in 1970–71.
For 1984–85 the PPA and the CBLA recorded capital expenditure of £2·3 million and £16·6 million. These sums are excluded from the table.

Special Claims (Staff)

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many of the 5,000 additional staff at the Department of Health and Social Security local offices will be posted to the special claims section; and if he will break this down by region.

[pursuant to his reply, 19 May 1986, c. 63]: The 500 extra staff for fraud work are separate from the 5,000 additional local office staff for general work. None of the 5,000 will be used on fraud work. As regards the disposition of the 500, I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for St. Albans (Mr. Utley) on 15 May, at column 533.

Employment

Parental And Family Leave

asked the Paymaster General what response Her Majesty's Government will make at the European Commission of the Council of Ministers meeting in June on the European Economic Community parental and family leave directive; and if he will make a statement.

The draft directive is not on the agenda for discussion at the June meeting of the EC Council of Labour and Social Affairs Ministers. The Government's opposition in principle to the draft directive is well known and in the event of it being raised for discussion at the Council the Government's response would, of course, be based on this position.

Labour Statistics

asked the Paymaster General how many (a) men and (b) women over the age of 50 years have been unemployed for over one, two, three, four, five and more than five years, respectively.

The following information is in the Library. Figures are given showing the numbers of male and female claimants aged over 50 years in the United Kingdom who, on 10 April 1986, had been unemployed for the durations requested.

MalesFemales
Over one year252,74583,640
Over two years180,57958,364
Over three years129,59640,291
Over four years89,82225,489
Over five years*58,21414,881
* These figures are affected by industrial action in 1981 and consequent emergency computer procedures.

Tourism

asked the Paymaster General what is his Department's estimate of the relationship between the sterling exchange rate with the dollar and the number of United States visitors to the United Kingdom; and if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the percentage change in the number of United States visitors to the United Kingdom since 1970.

Movements in exchange rates are only one of a number of complex factors which affect the decisions of tourists, and no attempt to quantify the relationship has been made.The number of visits by United States residents to the United Kingdom increased by 109 per cent. between 1970 and 1985 to 3,166,000 in 1985.

asked the Paymaster General what evidence he has as to the effectiveness of expenditure by the British Tourist Authority on promotion in the United States in increasing the number of visitors to the United Kingdom.

It is not possible to quantify the effects of the British Tourist Authority's expenditure. A number of factors influence international tourism flows, but the level of growth in traffic from the United States to the United Kingdom over a number of years in comparison with other European destinations suggests that the British Tourist Authority's sustained efforts in promoting the United Kingdom have been to good effect. The BTA enjoys a high standing in the tourism industry and the substantial contribution which the industry makes to the cost of the BTA's activities abroad shows that its effectiveness is recognised.

Job Release Allowance

asked the Paymaster General what was the job release allowance in 1980 and in each subsequent year up to the present date.

The following table gives the weekly job release allowances for each year since 1980.

TaxfreeTaxable
HigherLowerHigherLower
££££
198045·5036·0053·0043·00
198150·5040·0059·0047·50
198255·0043·5064·0052·00
198357·7545·7067·2054·60
198460·6548·0070·5557·35
198563·0049·9571·1558·35
198665·5051·9574·0060·65

asked the Paymaster General what has been the percentage increase in the level of the job release allowance for each year since 1980; and what were the percentage increases in the retail prices index for the corresponding years.

The following table gives the information requested.

Percentage Increases
(April)Tax-freeTaxableRetail price
HigherLowerHigherLowerIndex
1980–8111·011·0011·310·512·00
1981–828·98·88·59·59·4
1982–835·05·05·05·04·0
1983–845·05·15·05·05·2
1984–853·94·10·91·76·9
1985–864·04·04·03·93·0

Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs

Mr Raoul Wallenberg

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will raise the case of Mr. Raoul Wallenberg at the United Nations General Assembly; and if he will make a statement.

As I said in answer to a question from my hon. Friend on 12 February, we will continue to assist the Swedish Government in any way which may be appropriate in their efforts to establish the fate of Mr. Raoul Wallenberg.

South African Embassy

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will seek the removal of the military attaches from the South African embassy.

As my hon. Frind the Minister of State, the Member for Wallasey (Mrs. Chalker), told the hon. Member for Cynon Valley (Mrs. Clwyd) on 5 March, we agreed with our European partners to withdraw our military attaches from Pretoria and not to grant accreditation to military attaches from South Africa. The continued presence of South African military attaches in Britain remains under review.

Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

Southall Horse Market

asked the Minister of Agriculture. Fisheries and Food what recent inspections have been made of Southall horse market; what their results have been; and if he will make a statement.

My veterinary staff have inspected this market several times this year, most recently on 14 May, when it was noted that 18 new partitioned stalls had been erected for the separation of shod horses. Efforts have been made by the auctioneers to improve handling and prevent unauthorised access to the sale ring. Veterinary staff will continue to attend the market regularly to monitor and encourage compliance with the voluntary code of practice on horse markets.

Fishing Vessels (Registration)

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what information he has about restrictions existing in France and Denmark on foreign fishing vessels registering as French or Danish; and what rights such vessels have to participate in French and Danish fishing quotas.

I understand that for a fishing vessel to be registered in France it must be at least 50 per cent. owned by French nationals resident in a territory of the French Republic for a minimum of six months a year. Where the vessel is company-owned, 51 per cent. of the shares must be held by French nationals; and personnel, for example the president of the board of directors, the majority of directors and all the general managers, must also be French nationals. Once a vessel is registered it is entitled to fish against the French quota.In the case of Denmark, I understand that the entitlement to register a fishing vessel is confined to owners who are Danish nationals or are foreign nationals resident in Denmark. Where the owner is a body corporate, two thirds of the shares must be held by such persons. In order to fish against the national quota, a fishing vessel owner must also be registered and as a prerequisite to such registration he must be a Danish national or have lived in Denmark for at least two years and his income in the previous year must have been wholly earned from fishing.

Church Commissioners

Property Sales

asked the hon. Member for Workingham, as representing the Church Commissioners (1) whether diocesan officers consult the commissioners as to the choice of estate agents to handle the proposed sale of diocesan property;(2) whether, in decisions as to whether to approve sales of property proposed by individual diocesan parsonage boards, the commissioners take account of the estate agent whom the board proposes to use for the disposal of the property; and if he will make a statement.

Prime Minister

Rochester-Upon-Medway

Q86.

asked the Prime Minister if she has any plans to visit the city of Rochester-upon-Medway.

Engagements

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 5 June.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 5 June.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 5 June.

This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in this House I shall be having further meetings later today, including one with the Prime Minister of New Zealand.

House Of Commons

Private Bill Procedure

asked the Lord Privy Seal whether he has any plans to institute a review of private Bill procedure; and if he will make a statement.

Following consultations with the Chairman of Ways and Means, with my noble Friend the Lord President of the Council and the Lord Chairman of Committees, as well as discussions through the usual channels, I propose that there should be a general review of private Bill procedure to be carried out by a Joint Committee of both Houses. The Committee would examine the processes of enacting private legislation and consider whether:

  • (a) there are any matters of a kind at present dealt with by private Bill which could more appropriately be dealt with some other way, taking account of the interests both of promoters and other affected parties;
  • (b) any changes are desirable in private Bill procedure; and
  • (c) any amendments are desirable to the Private Legislation Procedure (Scotland) Act 1936 and the procedure thereunder.
  • It would also consider whether any amendments are desirable to the Statutory Orders (Special Procedure) Act 1945.

    I shall be tabling the appropriate motion later today.

    The Arts

    Sadler's Wells Theatre

    asked the Minister for the Arts what representations he has received on the funding of Sadler's Wells theatre: and if he will make a statement.

    I have received numerous representations about Sadler's Wells during my time as Minister for the Arts, but I am confident that the plurality of funding being provided by the Arts Council, private sponsorship and other sources will enable Sadler's Wells to continue as a receiving theatre in London

    Attorney-General

    Mortgage Arrears (Possession Orders)

    asked the Attorney-General, for each of the years for which figures are available since 1980 (a) how many possession orders have been sought and (b) how many possession orders have been granted, in respect of mortgage arrears in the county courts of Middlesbrough, Stockton and Hartlepool.

    The information requested is available only for individual county courts for years since 1982. Figures for 1982 to 1985 are given in the table.

    Applications entered and orders for possession granted in respect of mortgage arrears* at Hartlepool, Middlesbrough and Stockton county courts, 1982 to 1985.
    1982198319841985
    Hartlepool
    Applications entered367492151
    Orders granted20346270
    Middlesborough
    Applications entered313304386423
    Orders granted212212340352
    Stockton
    Applications entered160209269250
    Orders granted103116176200
    * Figures include both Local Authority and private mortgages

    Home Department

    Prisoners

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department, of those prisoners who died from natural causes in each of the years 1981 to 1985, respectively, how many applied for early release on the grounds of such illness; how many such applications were granted and refused, respectively; and how many of such refusals were referred to him for futher consideration.

    Information about the number of cases in which the royal prerogative of mercy was exercised to allow a terminally-ill prisoner to be released early was given in answer to the hon. and learned Member's question of 12 March, at columns 466–67. The other information requested is not immediately available, but I will see what relevant information can be obtained and I shall write to the hon. and learned Member.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) by what methods he is making sure that cases of terminally-ill prisoners needing urgent consideration are clearly identified;(2) by whom case workers in the criminal department have been reminded of the need to give cases of prisoners who are terminally-ill urgent and sympathetic consideration; and whether he will place a copy of such reminder in the Library;(3) when he proposes to give a reminder to prison department establishments of the need to give urgent and sympathetic consideration to cases involving the release of terminally-ill prisoners on similar lines to the reminder given to case workers in the criminal department.

    I would refer the hon. and learned Member to the answer given yesterday to his related questions on the subject of terminally-ill prisoners.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the estimated population of untried prisoners in Prison Department establishments in England and Wales on 19 April, or the latest date for which figures are available, by length of time since initial reception into custody.

    [pursuant to his reply, 28 April 1986, c. 304]: The information is given in the table.

    Estimated population* of untried prisoners in Prison Department Establishments in England and Wales on 28 February 1986. Length of time since initial remand in custody.†
    Estimated number‡
    Up to 3 months5,250
    Over 3, up to 6 months1,800
    Over 6, up to 9 months600
    Over 9, up to 12 months200
    Over 12 months60
    Total7,920
    * Based on records held centrally which are approximate, detailed checking of individual cases would involve disproportionate cost.
    † Including any time which may have been spent on bail after the initial remand in custody.
    ‡ Rounded estimates; the components do not add to the total because they have been rounded independently.

    Criminal Injuries Compensation Board

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many claims have been dealt with by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board at the latest available date in England and Wales.

    The provisional figure for the number of applications in respect of injuries incurred in England and Wales resolved by the board from 1 August 1964 to 31 March 1986 is 262,907.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many claims to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board are pending at the latest date.

    I would refer the hon. Member to the reply given to a question from my hon. Friend the Member for Bury St. Edmunds (Sir E. Griffiths) on 23 April 1986, at columns 149.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many claims to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board have been successful in England and Wales at the latest date.

    The provisional figure for the number of awards made by the board in respect of injuries incurred in England and Wales from 1 August 1964 to 31 March 1986 is 212,757.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is the highest settlement made by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board in England and Wales to the latest available date.

    The highest award made to date amounted to £303,500, in the financial year 1984–85.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many claims have been made to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board in (a) Liverpool and (b) Merseyside at the latest date;(2) what is the highest award made by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board in

    (a) Liverpool and (b) Merseyside to date;

    (3) how many claims to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board have been (a) successful and (b) rejected in Liverpool and Merseyside to date.

    Stastistics are not available on the place of residence of applicants to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is the longest waiting time to date for a claim to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board.

    Of applications currently outstanding, the longest waiting time is for one submitted to the board in August 1970. Regular interim awards have been paid, including one in May 1986, but the applicant's medical condition has not yet stabilised sufficiently for a final award to be made.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what is the current waiting time for appeals to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board at the latest date;(2) how many appeals are outstanding to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board at the latest date.

    At 30 April 1986 about 5,000 applications were awaiting hearing by the board. The length of time between an applicant refusing a single member's adjudication and a hearing varies between six and 18 months.

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what is the total cost to date of the running of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board;(2) if he will list the cost of the running of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board on an annual basis to the latest date.

    Costs of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme 1 August 1964 to 31 March 1986

    Financial year

    Administration

    Compensation

    £

    £

    *1964–65

    16,41233,431
    1965–6659,537402,718
    1966–6793,534914,161
    1967–68122,2791,293,772
    1968–69178,1971,672,958
    1969–70207,6861,996,584
    1970–71228,9522,114,189
    1971–72298,2283,282,172
    1972–73356,1823,457,519
    1973–74441,0144,077,125
    1974–75629,3135,145,851
    1975–76911,1656,476,680
    1976–771,157,6019,677,389
    1977–781,266,78910,106,513
    1978–791,577,54613,045,641
    1979–801,915,56015,737,363
    1980–812,930,21021,462,464
    1981–823,242,72621,976,696
    1982–833,742,15929,444,675
    1983–843,776,42432,820,772
    1984–854,163,29335,293,451
    †1985–864,384,00041,965,000
    Total31,698,807262,397,124

    * From 1 August.

    † Provisional.

    Northeye Prison

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many prisoners evacuated from Northeye prison are currently at Send; what changes have been made in security; and what plans he has for the dispersal of these prisoners.

    On 3 June 1986 there were 86 ex-Northeye prisoners at Her Majesty's prison Send. Security improvements at Send since 1 May consist of the provision of a UHF radio net, the fitting of grilles to the windows of the visits room and an increase of 12 in the authorised staffing level. The ex-Northeye population at Send will be gradually depleted by discharges and by transfers to other establishments. It is provisionally proposed that they will all have been discharged or removed by the end of August.

    Detention Centre Regime

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is his latest assessment of the detention centre regime introduced four years ago.

    Following the evaluation of the experimental tougher regime in selected detention centres between 1980 and 1984, a consistent detention centre regime was introduced in March 1985. We are satisfied that the regime, which is kept under routine review, is being positively developed along lines suitable for those young offenders on whom the courts impose short custodial sentences.

    Public Order

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) whether he has any plans to seek to amend the Public Order Bill (a) to make mass trespass on to farmland a criminal offence or (b) make trepans on to residential premises a criminal offence; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he will call for reports from the chief constables of Avon and Somerset, Dorset and Wiltshire on the recent incidents involving a hippy convoy in their areas, and as to the extra costs of policing which have arisen.

    I would refer my hon. Friend to the reply given to a private notice question by my hon. Friend the Member for the New Forest (Mr. McNair Wilson) on 3 June, at columns 733–34. On the separate issue of trespass on residential premises, we have no plans to bring forward legislation to amend the criminal law.I shall write to my hon. Friend about the cost of the police operations.

    Police-Immigration Operations

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what arrangements there are in the Metropolitan area for keeping records, both locally and centrally, of joint police-immigration operations.

    I understand from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis that he holds central records of all joint operations. The immigration service holds local records of all joint operations; additionally, central records are maintained of all major joint operations.

    Southall Horse Market

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many successful prosecutions for breaches of animal protection laws there have been since 1979 of horse and pony vendors at Southall horse market; and if he will make a statement.

    The information requested is not separately available from the information collected centrally.

    Road Traffic Offences

    asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what action he proposes to take during European Road Safety Year 1986 to increase vehicle users' perception of the risk of being detected for road traffic offences.

    The enforcement of road traffic law is the responsibility of individual chief officers of police. The Government's rolling programme of publicity on road safety includes the theme of police enforcement.

    Northern Ireland

    Tourism

    12.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what was the estimated number of non-United Kingdom visitors to Northern Ireland in 1985; and if he will make a statement.

    The Northern Ireland Tourist Board's estimate of non-United Kingdom visitors to Northern Ireland in 1985 is 444,000. This was a drop of 59,000 compared with the 1984 figure, largely arising from a drop of 81,000 in the number of visitors from the Republic. Visitors from the rest of the world increased by 22,000.

    Northern Ireland Assembly

    13.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement on the outcome of his discussions with Northern Ireland political parties on the future of the Northern Ireland Assembly.

    The leaders of the Ulster Unionist Party and the Democratic Unionist Party declined my invitation of 27 May to the parties participating in the Northern Ireland Assembly to discuss its future. I met the Leader of the Alliance party on Monday to hear his views. I also saw yesterday the Leader of the Social Democratic and Labour party with some of his colleagues and discussed among other matters the prospects for devolved government. I shall consider the position of the present Assembly.

    Small Firms

    14.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he plans any change in Government support for small firms in Northern Ireland, following the recent launch of a loan fund for small firms by Shell United Kingdom.

    I commend the initiative of Shell United Kingdom, in arranging for these funds to be made available. The provision of 18 per cent. of total fund to Northern Ireland — a total of £90,000 — is a vote of confidence in the Province and in the enterprise of its young people. I have no immediate plans for adding to the existing comprehensive range of support for small firms in the Province.

    Labour Statistics

    15.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many vacancies are currently on offer at careers offices in Northern Ireland.

    At 4 April 1986, there were 576 unfilled vacancies for young people aged under 18 at employment service jobmarkets in Northern Ireland. On the same date there were also 2,206 unfilled vacancies for adults.

    Anglo-Irish Agreement

    16.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what have been the effects on Northern Ireland industry arising from the Anglo-Irish agreement.

    We hope that the agreement, which was widely welcomed abroad, will lead to increased investment. Investment is, however, less likely to take place if there is further disruption such as that which took place on 3 March.

    21.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what have been the economic and social benefits for the people of Northern Ireland arising from the first six months of the Anglo-Irish agreement.

    Within the framework of the Intergovernmental conference the Irish Government have put forward views on matters of significant or special interest to the minority community in relation to economic and social policy, as well as in the fields of education, health and housing, as has been reported in the communiqués. We are now considering these further. The conference has also discussed possible ways of enhancing co-operation in the promotion of tourism.

    Rothmans Factory, Carrickfergus

    17.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps the Government are taking to alleviate the effect on the work force in view of the announcement of redundancies at Rothmans factory in Carrickfergus.

    As I announced on 6 May I have asked a group of officials to examine the situation with a view to alleviating the effects of the redundancies at Carrickfergus. We have already provided on the spot information about job vacancies and offered job and new business development counselling to those who wish to avail themselves of it.I have also decided to increase from 45 per cent. to 50 per cent. the rate of industrial development grant available in the Carrickfergus area.

    Trade Missions

    18.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement about the outcome of trade missions arranged by the Industrial Development Board in 1985–86.

    During 1985–86 the industrial development board arranged five trade missions to Europe and north America. Orders received by companies participating in these missions amounted to £1·5 million, and further orders with an anticipated value of around £8 million are expected.

    Job Clubs

    19.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what has been the outcome of the job clubs experiment in Northern Ireland.

    Job clubs have been operating in Belfast and Londonderry job markets since 6 January on a trial basis. To date 122 long-term unemployed persons have joined and of this number 63 have obtained jobs or places on training schemes.

    Security

    20.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement on cross-border security.

    Recently there has been a number of serious terrorist incidents close to the Border in Northern Ireland. These emphasise the importance of the steady development of closer co-operation between the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the Garda Siochana which has been set in hand under the Anglo-Irish agreement.

    Financial Services

    22.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland when he next intends to meet the Irish Justice Minister to discuss financial services between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.

    It is not our normal practice to give advance notice of meetings with Irish Ministers.

    Political Parties (Talks)

    23.

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what discussions he has had recently with representatives of Northern Ireland political parties.

    I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given to his question on I May. The leaders of the Ulster Unionist Party and the Democratic Unionist Party declined my invitation of 27 May to the parties participating in the Northern Ireland Assembly to discuss its future. I met the Leader of the Alliance Party on Monday to hear his views. I also saw yesterday the Leader of the Social Democratic and Labour Party with some of his colleagues and discussed among other matters the prospects for devolved government.

    Prison Officers

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many prison officers have been (a) injured and (b murdered in each of the past 10 years; and if he will make a statement.

    Information on staff injuries is not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. The number of staff murdered in each of the past 10 years is as follows:

    Number
    19763
    19773
    19782
    19799
    19802
    19810
    19822
    19831
    19841
    19851
    1986*0
    *To date.
    Protection of prison staff is a matter of high priority and much emphasis has been put on the provision of appropriate security arrangements, both at and way from the prison establishments.

    Defence

    Sa-80

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if there will be any limits placed on the prime contractor for the SA-80 as to how much of the order may be subcontracted abroad.

    Yes. While United Kingdom prime contractors will be permitted to include overseas subcomponents with the exception of any deemed essential to the maintenance of a United Kingdom small arms manufacturing capability, potential tenderers have been informed that United Kingdom content will be an important factor in assessing the overall value for money which determines our procurement policies.

    Small Arms And Ammunition

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what percentage of his Department's small arms and ammunitions requirement he intends to open to competition in 1986–87, 1987–88, 1988–89 and 1989–90, respectively.

    Our intention is that small arms requirements in the period in question will wherever practicable be open to competition, and this is expected to encompass the bulk of such purchases. With regard to small arms ammunition for 1986–87 I have nothing to add to my answer of 16 May 1986, at column 565. Future decisions will be taken and announced in due course.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence on what basis he decided the specific percentages of small arms and ammunition requirements which would be open to competition in 1986 and 1987, respectively.

    Such decisions are taken on the basis of the policy stated by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister on 13 January, at column 517.

    Challenger Tank

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the dates and numbers of orders placed for the Challenger main battle tank; and if he will make a statement.

    Production orders for Challenger MBT have been as follows:

    Date
    April 1982To equip four regiments
    November 1982
    June 1984To equip fifth regiment
    July 1985To equip sixth regiment
    In addition to the operational requirements, these orders have included tanks to meet repair and training needs.

    Multi-Launch Rocket System

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence to what he attributes the delay in the placing of a contract by the pilot nation for the multi-launch rocket system phase 1 system; when he now expects this contract to be placed; what are the implications of the delay for the planned procurement of this system for the United Kingdom regiments; and if he will make a statement.

    As reflected in the reply to the hon. Member for Orkney and Shetland (Mr. Wallace) on 30 January 1986, at column 630, the contract award was planned for May this year. As I announced last week, the contract was duly awarded by Germany, the pilot nation, on behalf of the European partners, to the Europaische Produktions Gesellschaft mbH (EPG) on Tuesday 27 May 1986.