Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 100: debated on Friday 4 July 1986

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Friday 4 July 1986

Education And Science

Teachers' Salaries

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what a scale 1 teacher was paid on 1 May of each year since 1974, at outturn and at current prices.

The table shows the salary (excluding all allowances) of teachers in maintained and primary and secondary schools at point 13 of scale 1 on 1 May of each year since 1974 in cash prices and in 1986 prices (adjusted by reference to the RPI).

1 MayCash pricesConstant prices*
£ per annum£ per annum
19742,5539,159
19753,74410,745
19764,05610,088
19774,2399,005
19784,6629,195
19795,0829,086
19806,2289,134
19817,3179,603
19827,7559,296
19838,1429,412
19848,5569,409
19859,1479,400
19869,8049,804
* RPI-adjusted to April 1986 level.

Notes:

(1) Although point 13 is the maximim point for scale 1, there are two further points on the scale which are granted to teachers who are good honours graduates.

(2) The 1974 figure excludes the Houghton award which was implemented with effect from 24 May.

Educational Maintenance Allowances

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what would be the estimated cost of providing an educational maintenance allowance of £27 at 1985–86 prices for all pupils remaining in schools or colleges for one year after the school leaving age, for one week, 38 weeks, 40 weeks, 46 weeks and 52 weeks, after deducting child benefit and existing educational maintenance allowances; and if he will give projections on the same basis for each of the next three years.

The estimated cost, based on provisional 1985–86 pupil and student numbers and projected numbers for the following three years, would be as follows:

£ million
Weeks
138404652
1985–866230243283322
1986–876222235273312
1987–886229242281320
1988–896219231269307

Note: These costs are based on the proposed allowance of £27 per week, less child benefit at the current rate of £7 per week, and assume no change in the estimated 1984–85 level of local authority spending on maintenance grants, which has been converted to 1985–86 prices for the purpose of the current calculations.

Mature Students (Grants)

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what was the average grant paid to a mature student in full-time higher education for the last year for which a figure is available.

The mandatory awards regulations do not define a mature student. However, from their mid-20s, students may, in addition to a full grant, receive certain supplementary allowances, including an older students allowance and an allowance for dependants. In the academic year 1984–85 the average allowance paid to students in these categories was £530 and £1,355, respectively. This was in addition to a grant (for students not living with their parents) of £2,100 (London rate) of £1,775 (elsewhere rate).

Education Budget

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what proportion of gross domestic product has been spent on the education budget in 1984–85 and 1985–86.

Total public expenditure on education in the United Kingdom was 5·1 per cent. of gross domestic product in 1984–85. Final figures for 1985–86 are not yet available, but on the basis of estimates published in the public expenditure White Paper and the financial statement and Budget report, outturn for public expenditure on education in that year represents 4·8 per cent. of gross domestic product.

Schizophrenia

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science how much the Government will be spending in the current year on research into the causes of schizophrenia; if he has any plans to increase this amount; and if he will make a statement.

The Medical Research Council (MRC), which receives its grant-in-aid through the Department, is the main Government agency for the promotion of medical research in the United Kingdom. I understand that in the financial year 1985–86, the latest year for which information is available, the MRC spent £525,000 on projects exclusively on research into schizophrenia and a further £1,573,000 on projects which have schizophrenia as a minor component. The MRC is always willing to consider soundly based scientific proposals in competition with other applications.Research work relevant to schizophrenia is also being conducted in universities and medical schools, financed from the block grant to universities allocated for teaching and research on advice from the University Grams Committee. Figures are not available.I would also refer the right. hon. Member to my reply of 1 July at c.

469 to my hon. Friend the Member for Bournemouth, East (Mr. Atkinson).

Defence

Airborne Early Warning Radar System

asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make it his policy that all bidders for the airborne early warning radar system will be subject to identical deadlines in all respects; and if he will make a statement.

asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he has extended the deadline for the testing of airborne early warning radar systems in operational environmental conditions beyond 3 September; and if he will make a statement.

Military Bands

asked the Secretary of State for Defence how much is being spent currently by his Department on military bands and musical training in the armed forces.

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my hon. Friend to the hon. Member for Meirionnydd Nant Conwy (Mr. Thomas) on 24 March at c. 395.Costs of musical training in the armed forces cannot be separately identified.

Energy

British Gas

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will provide details of the provisions for employee shareholdings to be made for the chairman and senior and area management of British Gas under privatisation.

I refer the hon. Member to my right hon. Friend's announcement on 18 June at columns 537–39. The chairman and management of British Gas will be eligible for the Government share offers on the same basis as other staff.

Domestic Consumers (Disconnections)

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will discuss with the gas and electricity boards measures to prevent disconnection of a consumer when the contents of a pre-payment meter have been stolen.

The code of practice on disconnections ensures that disconnection is used only as a last resort; the options that are examined before disconnection is pursued are shown in this code. The British Gas Corporation and the electricity supply industry consider individually each case of theft from a meter. Where they are satisfied that the theft was the work of a third party, unconnected with the household, they may waive the obligation on the consumer to make good the losses.

Northern Engineering International Nuclear Systems

asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will discuss with the chairman of British Nuclear Fuels Ltd. the implications for standards of quality and safety of the proposed closure of Northern Engineering International Nuclear Systems, Gateshead, and the consequential transfer to other suppliers of 11 of a 15-module order for the thermal oxide reprocessing plant at Sellafield, currently in production; and if he will make a statement.

Overseas Development

Guyana

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the amount of aid given by Her Majesty's Government to Guyana in each of the past five years.

Gross British official aid to Guyana was as follows:

£'000
19812,475
19821,724
19831,555
1984419
1985354

Afghan Refugees

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what financial and other assistance the United Kingdom is providing to Afghan refugees in Pakistan.

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave my hon. Friend the Member for Lewisham, East (Mr. Moynihan) on 21 April at column 35.

Jamaica

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the cost of the emergency relief Her Majesty's Government have provided to Jamaica to assist in the repair of damage caused by recent floods; if he is proposing any long-term rehabilitation schemes to follow the immediate assistance; and if he will make a statement.

The total cost of the emergency relief is expected to be around £300,000. In response to a request from the Jamaican Government, we have also provided 150 tonnes of Bailey bridging and associated material under an additional £250,000 programme aid loan. The bridging has already been shipped. We have no current plans for assisting with long-term rehabilitation.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he expects the 150 tonnes of Bailey bridging materials Her Majesty's Government are providing to replace bridges destroyed by the recent floods in Jamaica to arrive.

The Bailey bridging materials are expected to arrive in Jamaica on 27 July.

Wales

Technical And Vocational Education Initiative

asked the Secretary of State for Wales how much has been spent in Wales on the technical and vocational education initiative and community programme vocational education schemes in each year since their inception.

I am advised by the Manpower Services Commission that expenditure under the technical and vocational education initiative for the financial years 1983–84, 1984–85 and 1985–86 was £1,449,568, £2,375.573 and £3,105,377, respectively.The CPVE is administered by the Joint Board for Pre-Vocational Education and figures for the Board's expenditure in Wales are not separately available. The Welsh Office contributes to the grant paid by the Department of Education and Science to the joint board for the development of the CPVE. For the financial years 1983–84, 1984–85 and 1985–86 the contribution was £48,000, £41,000 and £57,000, respectively.

asked the Secretary of State for Wales how much money has been spent on provision for Welsh-medium instruction of the technical and vocational education initiative and community programme vocational education schemes in Wales in each year since their inception.

It is not possible separately to identify expenditure on provision for Welsh medium teaching under the TVEI and CPVE schemes.

Northern Ireland

Housing Executive (Offices)

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what was the'tender price accepted for the building of the new offices of the Northern Ireland Housing Executive at Coleraine; and what has been the final cost for the completion of the building.

A fluctuating price tender of £492,918.91 was accepted by the Northern Ireland Housing Executive on 24 October 1984 for the construction of a new office building at Coleraine. The building reached practical completion on 20 June 1986. The estimated final cost is £534,250.

Housing Legislation

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what is the nature of the legislation on housing which the chief executive of the Northern Ireland Housing Executive announced on 20 June soon to be introduced.

The chief executive of the Northern Ireland Housing Executive was referring to the Government's previously announced intention to introduce legislation on homelessness for Northern Ireland.

Voting Rights

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement about the discussion by the Anglo-Irish Intergovernmental Conference of the voting rights of Irish citizens in Northern Ireland.

Before the meeting of the Intergovernmental Conference on 17 June, the Irish Government put forward proposals concerning the voting rights of certain Northern Ireland residents in some Northern Ireland elections. The position of those voters (both British and Irish citizens) who may vote at parliamentary and European elections but not at local government or Northern Ireland Assembly elections, was subsequently discussed at that meeting. The United Kingdom representatives confirmed the Government's view that the provisions governing the franchise for parliamentary elections throughout the United Kingdom should also be applied to local government elections in Northern Ireland, as they are in Great Britain, and to elections to the Northern Ireland Assembly; and they stated their intention of taking appropriate legislative action.

Irish Language

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement about the discussion by the Anglo-Irish Intergovernmental Conference of the treatment of the Irish language in Northern Ireland.

The Irish Government put forward proposals concerning the position of the Irish language in Northern Ireland at the conference on 10 January. At its meeting on 17 June the United Kingdom Government described current administrative practice, and indicated as areas for possible future development the provision of dual language street names where the local community so desires; ascertaining more precisely the number of Irish speakers in Northern Ireland; and financial support for Irish language-related cultural activities.

Flags And Emblems

asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make a statement about the discussion of flags and emblems by the Anglo-Irish Intergovernmental Conference.

The Irish Government put forward proposals relating to flags and emblems at the conference on 10 January. At its meeting on 11 March the United Kingdom Government described the public order legislation for Great Britain before Parliament; explained the desirability of bringing Northern Ireland public order legislation so far as possible into line with that for Great Britain; and indicated that the question of flags and emblems would be considered in the context of the extension, as appropriate, by Order in Council, of this legislation to Northern Ireland. That remains the position.

Trade And Industry

British Shipbuilders

asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what current discussions are taking place between his Department and British Shipbuilders about contracts for (a) new merchant vessels and (b) merchant vessel refits.

British Shipbuilders keeps my Department in close touch about possible contracts. Details are commercially confidential.

South Africa

asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1) what account has been taken by Her Majesty's Government in estimating the net number of jobs at risk from the possible imposition of sanctions against South Africa, of any offsetting job gains resulting from the manufacture in the United Kingdom of goods previously imported and the investment in the United Kingdom of capital previously exported to South Africa; and if he will make a statement;(2) what method of calculation has been used to arrive at a figure of 120,000 job losses in the United Kingdom if full economic sanctions were applied to South Africa.

asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if any contingency plans exist for alternative sources of supplies of strategically important minerals currently supplied by South Africa; and if he will make a statement.

Telecommunications Act (Licences)

asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what action he intends to take in respect of pre-1984 Telecommunications Act licences which will cease to be valid on 5 August.

I shall be making an order under the 1984 Act which will have the effect of extending their validity by up to a further three years depending on the licence involved.

Transport

Safety Barriers

asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many motorway and trunk road cross-over accidents have occurred in the past five years involving the rupture or crossing of safety barriers; and what form of construction was used for those road barriers.

The most recent figures available are given in the table.

YearMotorways'A' Road Dual Carriageways*
19802832
19813826
19822143
19834052
19842956
* Includes both trunk and non-trunk roads, because separate statistics are not collected for these categories of roads.
National statistics on the types of barriers involved in cross-over accidents are not collected. For motorways the barrier would almost certainly have been a steel safety fence or either the tensioned corrugated beam or untensioned open box beam type, as these designs are used most widely. For dual carriageways it is reasonable to assume that in most cases the barriers would have been of the types mentioned above.

Air Travel Reserve Fund Agency

asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he has received the annual report and accounts of the Air Travel Reserve Fund Agency for 1985–86.

Yes. The agency's final report is published today and copies are available in the Library. In acknowledging the report I would like to pay tribute to the work undertaken on behalf of holidaymakers by the chairman Sir Kenneth Selby, the members of the agency and their few executive staff. The history of the agency included in the report is itself testimony to the agency's efforts over the past 11 years.I have read with interest the important points which Sir Kenneth has made in the report and I am sure that the trustees of the new Air Travel Trust, and the independent committee which advises them, will consider the report carefully. The committee will benefit from the expertise of members who were also members of the agency, and their presence will ensure an element of continuity with the experience of the agency.

Catholic Church, Biddlestone, Northumberland

asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether the Forestry Commission has completed the sale of the Catholic chapel at Biddlestone, near Harbottle, Northumberland; and if he will make a statement.

I have been asked to reply.Contracts for the sale of the chapel have been exchanged, but the sale is not yet completed.

Prime Minister

"The Soe In Scandinavia"

asked the Prime Minister what representations Her Majesty's Government have received about the accuracy of the volume of the official history of the war entitled "The SOE in Scandinavia"; what response has been made; and if she will make a statement.

Nuclear Accidents (Effects)

asked the Prime Minister, pursuant to her reply to the hon. Member for East Lothian on 30 June, if she will now provide the information requested concerning estimates of the possible scale of the financial, material and human costs of an accident at a British nuclear installation of similar magnitude to that which began at Chernobyl on 26 April; and if she will make a statement.

I have nothing to add to my previous answer on 30 June at column 412.

Nuclear Reactors

asked the Prime Minister, pursuant to her reply to the hon. Member for East Lothian on Monday 30 June, if she will specify the fundamental differences between the nuclear steam supply system in the reactor at Chernobyl and those reactors operating in the United Kingdom.

The Chernobyl design involves cooling the nuclear fuel by boiling water. The water and fuel are contained in pressure tubes running through the reactor core. The steam from the boiling water goes directly to the turbine generators in a direct cycle system.BNFL's and generating boards power reactors operate at much lower pressures and moderator temperatures and are cooled by carbon dioxide gas. This gas heats separate boilers to produce the steam, and this steam, which is never in contact with the nuclear fuel, drives the turbine generators.

Civil Service

Civil Servants (Political Adherence)

asked the Minister for the Civil Service in what circumstances he collects information on the political adherence of civil servants.

I shall let my hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.

Items accepted since I January 1986
ItemConditionsAllocation
Collar Chain of a K.CMGUnconditionalImperial War Museum
Chattels at Hagley HallIn situBirmingham District Council
Sir Arthur Bryant CorrespondenceConditionalImperial War Museum
Items Awaiting Allocation
Portrait by Sir Thomas LawrenceUnconditional—wish expressed to remain in situ9 April 1986
Archives from the Dukes of Portland and NewcastleUnconditional—wish expressed that they remain at Nottingham University Library, Bodleian Library Oxford, Nottinghamshire Record Library, Hampshire Record Library14 March 1986
9 Paintings by Ben NicholsonUnconditional12 February 1986
Hans Arp Bronze SculptureUnconditional—wish expressed to go to Tate12 March 1986
A press notice will be issued on 4 July 1986 to publicise this information.

Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs

Guyana

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations Her Majesty's Government have recently made to the Government of Guyans concerning human rights; and if he will make a statement.

None. We have regularly made clear at the United Nations and in other international human rights bodies our concern that human rights should be respected in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the two international covenants on human rights, to which Guyana is a party. The Guyanese Government are well aware of our views.

The Arts

Objects In Lieu Of Tax

asked the Minister for the Arts whether he will specify the allocations made to public institutions in the United Kingdom during the half-year ended 30 June of individual works of art and museum objects preeminent for national, scientific, historic and artistic interest which have been accepted in satisfaction of capital transfer tax, together with information, where applicable, as to the conditions or wishes expressed in the matter of allocation by testators and executors; and whether he will list the works of art and museum objects which are still awaiting allocation, with the respective dates of their acceptance in satisfaction of capital transfer tax.

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the United Kingdom's relations with Guyana.

We enjoy good relations with Guyana and are represented by a high commissioner resident in Georgetown.

South Africa

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if, when he visits South Africa, he will make it his policy to refrain from meeting any person who has given support to the practice of murder by the placing of burning tyres around the neck of a living human being; and if he will make a statement.

We have consistently condemned the use of violence on all sides in South Africa. My right hon. and learned Friend's visit, on behalf of the Twelve member states of the European Community, is a further effort to promote the dialogue and the suspension of violence that are so urgently needed.

Test Ban Treaty

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much money was allocated in 1985–86 for research on verification of a comprehensive test ban treaty.

I have been asked to reply.The most important verification technology is seismology. Government expenditure on unclassified work in this area during 1985–86 was £1·5 million. The Government also undertake classified work in related areas, details of which cannot be revealed on grounds of national security.

Home Department

Psychopathically Disordered Prisoners

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many psychopathically disordered patients were resident in the four English special hospitals at the time of the implementation of the Mental Health Act 1983; how many patients since that time have been discharged from hospital by the mental health tribunals; and of those cases discharged by the mental health tribunals, how many are known to have subsequently offended by committing an offence similar in nature and equal or worse in degree compared to their index (admission) offences.

Information is not available in precisely the form requested. At the end of 1983 there were 411 patients suffering from psychopathic disorder in special hospitals in England, of whom 339 were subject to the special restrictions set out in section 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983. Two restricted patients admitted to special hospitals by reason of psychopathic disorder were discharged by a mental health review tribunal between the coming into force of the Act on 30 September 1983 and the end of 1983; 24 were so discharged in 1984; and the provisional figure for 1985 is 12. Of these 38 patients, four are known to have committed subsequently a serious offence of a similar nature to their index offence.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many convicted prisoners in the last five consecutive years for which figures are available have been transferred to the four English special hospitals for treatment of their psychopathic disorder; of these cases, what was the average time, to the nearest month, which

Number of persons accepted for settlement in the United Kingdom, 1980 to 1985
Nationality198019811982198319841985
Pakistan9,0808,9707,7506,4405,5106,680
India7,9306.5905,4105,3805,1405,500
Bangladesh5,2105,8107,0204,8704,1805,330
Barbados1008060405060
Guyana240220180190190200
Jamaica590440320310290350
Trinidad and Tobago150150150120150160

Crime Prevention

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the crime prevention initiatives taken since May 1979.

elapsed between their conviction and transfer to the special hospital; and of these, how many remained in special hospitals after the expiry date of their sentence.

The number of such prisoners and the average time between their conviction and transfer are as follows:

PrisonersMonths
19811024
1982627
1983724
19841331
1985*1921
* Provisional.
Information about how many of these prisoners remained in hospital after the end of their sentence is not readily available.

India (Kabbadi)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (I) if he will grant limited entry into the United Kingdom for amateur sportsmen from the Indian sub-continent who are kabbadi players;(2) why he is insisting on work permits to be presented by amateur kabbadi players from the Indian sub-continent coming to Britain every summer.

Whether sportsmen require work permits depends on the terms of their engagement. I have considered the question of the admission of kabbadi players and have decided that they may be admitted without work permits unless the immigration officer is not satisfied that they meet the requirements of the immigration rules as visitors.

Immigration

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what are the latest figures for permanent settlement in the United Kingdom from (a) the West Indies, (b) Pakistan, (c) India and (d) Bangladesh; and how they compare with the comparable figures for settlement in each of the past five years.

The numbers of persons accepted for settlement in the United Kingdom, by nationality, are published annually in Command Paper "Control of Immigration: Statistics, United Kingdom". The following table gives the figures for the nationalities requested where they are separately identified in the published statistics.

Among the many crime prevention initiatives taken since May 1979 are the following:

  • —the establishment of the Home Office crime prevention unit to undertake research, formulate policy, monitor implementation and to provide advice;
  • —the expansion of the Home Office crime prevention centre at Stafford which trains police officers in crime prevention matters;
  • —the formation of the ministerial group on crime prevention to carry forward the crime prevention strategy and to review the arrangements within and outside of Government of the co-ordination, development and implementation of initiatives;
  • —the holding of two national seminars at No. 10 Downing street;
  • —encouraging the expansion of neighbourhood watch and similar schemes;
  • —raising the profile of crime prevention in the community at large by way of conferences and seminars;
  • —stimulating crime prevention activities and initiatives now being carried forward by non-Government bodies;
  • —encouraging the production of British standards on the security of buildings and vehicle security;
  • —the dissemination of crime prevention advice and guidance: through leaflet, poster, press, radio and television publicity campaigns;
  • —the provision of funds for crime prevention measures under the urban programme and through the urban housing renewal unit;
  • —the approval of some 5,000 places for crime prevention projects under the communty programme;
  • —the dissemination of information about good practice in police and local authority crime prevention schemes;
  • —the setting up of working groups, to report to the Home Office standing conference on crime prevention, on residential burglary, car security, commercial robbery, shop theft and the prevention of violence associated with licensed premises;
  • —the production of revised guidelines for crime prevention panels;
  • —the establishment of five local demonstration projects to stimulate a multi-agency involvement in tackling crime problems of particular concern to communities in specific locations;
  • —urging local authorities, commerce, voluntary groups, industry, trade unions and all other sectors of the community to identify and act upon the crime prevention potential within their fields of activity.

Passports

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what means have been employed to ascertain the demand for bilingual passport application forms.

The two passport offices serving Wales have sought to record requests for forms in Welsh and receipt of forms completed in Welsh. Since 1980 they have recorded three requests for such forms and receipt of two forms completed in Welsh.

Mentally Ill People

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will call for a report from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and the chief constable of the West Midlands police as to the number of people who have been escorted to police custody for behaviour or offences warranting detention in a mental hospital or psychiatric institution under section 136 of the Mental Health Act; and what proportion of them were, after consultation in police custody with a psychiatrist or social worker (a) committed to one of the above establishments and (b) sent home.

Statistics of persons detained by the police under section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 are not maintained locally or centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. 1 would refer the hon. Member to the reply given to a question from the hon. Member for St Helens, South (Mr. Bermingham) on 19 May at c. 13.

Prisons (Mother And Baby Units)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many mother and baby units there are in each prison accommodating female prisoners.

The Prison Department has three mother and baby units — at Holloway, Styal and Askham Grange.

Afghan Refugees

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many Afghan refugees have been granted asylum in the United Kingdom.

The information requested was published in tables 2 and 3 of Home Office statistical bulletin No. 12/86, "Refugee Statistics, United Kingdom, 1985" on 1 May 1986.

Prisoners (Drugs)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the average weekly dose by volume per capita of each of the main categories of drugs given in (a) each prison for male prisoners and (b) each prison for female offenders, during the last year for which figures are available.

Medicines administered to prisoner patients are not statistically recorded by volume. Information on the use of medicines in prison service establishments, including information about the use of certain categories of medicines, is published annually in the report on the work of the Prison Department, copies of which are in the Library. The most recently published report is that for 1984–85 (Cmnd. 9699).

Immigration Rules

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will amend the immigration rules to prevent men who come here as visitors and who then advertise for a bride being allowed to settle in the United Kingdom on the basis of marriage.

No. The immigration rules already prevent marriage being used in this way as a device to obtain settlement. One of the requirements of the existing rules is that the Secretary of State must be satisfied that the marriage was not entered into primarily to obtain settlement here. A man who entered this country as a visitor and advertised for a bride would be most unlikely to be able to satisfy that requirement of the rules if he then applied to remain permanently on the basis of the marriage.

Scotland

Life Sentence Prisoners

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will give details of the average period of time taken to make review board decisions in the case of prisoners serving life sentences in Scotland (a) from 1979 until 1984 and (b) from 1984 onwards; and if he will make a statement.

Information is not available in the form requested. The initial review of the suitability or otherwise of an indeterminate sentence prisoner for release on life licence is carried out by a local review committee at the penal establishment concerned. Detailed reports and consideration by the local review committee normally take about 3 to 4 months to complete. The time taken to complete other stages of the review process, which under statute has to include consultation with the judiciary and a favourable recommendation from the Parole Board for Scotland before a provisional release date is granted by my right hon. and learned Friend, varies according to the circumstances of the individual case and the number and complexity of cases currently under consideration.A new form of record keeping introduced last year has shown that in recent months the time taken to complete reviews has increased, but steps are being taken to improve the turnover as quickly as possible.

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will give details of the average period of time taken to make review board decisions in the case of those categories of prisoners serving a minimum life sentence of 20 years following legislation introduced in 1984 (a) in Scottish prisons and (b) in Saughton prison, Edinburgh; and if he will make a statement.

Information is not available in the form requested.On 18 December 1984, at columns

90–91, my right hon. and learned Friend announced that he had made clear to the Parole Board for Scotland that only in exceptional circumstances would he feel that release earlier than 20 years would be appropriate for a prisoner sentenced to life imprisonment for certain categories of murder (in particular, murders of police officers or prison officers, murder by terrorists, sexual or sadistic murders of children or murders committed by firearm in the commission of crime). These cases are subject to the same procedures of review as those of other indeterminate sentence prisoners although the timing of reviews may reflect the longer period in custody which the individual may be expected to serve.

Reviews of cases for especially grave offences may take longer to complete because of their serious nature or the potential risk to public safety on release.

European Regional Development Fund

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will give details of the total European regional development fund moneys for each year since 1979 for Scotland.

Total awards from the European regional development fund for Scotland from 1979 are as follows:

£ million
TotalInfrastructureIndustryNon-Quota
197937·935·92·0
198027·917·110·8
198170·755·315·4
198271·661·71·98·0
198383·563·919·6
1984103·259·433·810·0
1985121·4*100·421·0
Total516·2393·7104·518·0
* Including £68·2 million for the Glasgow national programme of community interest.

Homelessness

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many families were placed in bed-and-breakfast type accommodation for homeless people in 1985 in (a) Strathclyde and (b) Scotland.

3,019 households in Scotland who applied during 1985 under the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977 were housed initially in bed-and-breakfast accommodation. Of these, 2,781 were in Strathclyde region.

Employment

Community Programme

asked the Paymaster General how many community programme managing agents or sponsors have been excluded from the scheme or had their work curtailed since 1983; and what were the reasons for exclusion.

Information on the number of managing agents and sponsors whose scheme contracts have not been renewed, or which have terminated early, is not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Labour Statistics

asked the Paymaster General what is the rate of unemployment in the south of England, defined as south of a line from Bristol to the Wash; and what is the rate in the rest of the United Kingdom.

On 8 May 1986 the rate of unemployment in the South of England, defined as those counties* south of a line from Bristol to the Wash, was 10·3 per cent. The corresponding figure for the rest of the United Kingdom was 15·9 per cent.

* Avon, Bedfordshire, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Cambridgeshire, Cornwall, Devon, Dorset, East Sussex, Essex, Greater London, Hampshire, Hertfordshire, Isle of Wight, Kent, Norfolk, Northamptonshire, Oxfordshire, Somerset, Suffolk, Surrey, Wiltshire and West Sussex.

asked the Paymaster General what has been the change in numbers and percentage in the size of the civilian employed labour force in the south of England, defined as south of a line from Bristol to the Wash, since 1966 and since 1976, respectively; and what are the comparable figures for the rest of the United Kingdom.

Civilian employed labour force
Change between June 1966 and June 1985Change between June 1976 and June 1985
NumbersPercentageNumbersPercentage
South of England*544,0005·3551,0005·3
-1,408,00-
Rest of the United Kingdom0-9·6-973,000-6·9
* South East. East Anglia and South West regions.

asked the Paymaster General how many unemployed people under 25 years old drawing benefit there have been in the south-east for each of the last 10 years; and what percentage this was of (a) south-east unemployment and (b) United Kingdom unemployment.

The following information is in the Library. The table shows the numbers of unemployed claimants aged under 25 years in the south-east region for April of each year from 1983. The figures relate to unemployed persons claiming unemployment benefit, supplementary benefit or national insurance credits at unemployment benefit offices. Comparisons over the period are affected by the change in the timing of compilation of unemployment statistics in March 1986. Analyses of unemployed claimants are not available before October 1982.

Unemployed Claimants—under 25 years
South EastPercentage of South East TotalPercentage of United Kingdom Total
AprilNumberPer cent.Per cent.
1983261,08935·78·2
1984265,62736·38·5
1985275,66535·28·4
1986262,71433·17·9

Part-Time Employment

asked the Paymaster General what is the official definition of part-time employment.

Part-time employment is not defined as such in employment legislation. The criterion most widely used in the Department of Employment's statistics is whether an individual works 30 hours a week or less, excluding overtime, but other definitions are also in use.

Lost Working Days

asked the Paymaster General what criteria his Department uses to define a strike for the purposes of the statistics of the numbers of working days lost due to industrial disputes.

The statistics relate to stoppages of work in the United Kingdom due to industrial disputes between employers and workers, or between workers and other workers, connected with terms and conditions of employment. No distinction is made between lawful and unlawful stoppages, and both are included in the statistics.

The available information is as follows:Disputes which do not result in a stoppage of work--for example, work-to-rules and go-slows — are not included in the statistics, as their effects are not readily quantifiable. Stoppages involving fewer than 10 workers or lasting less than one day are excluded, unless the total number of working days lost in the dispute is greater than 100.In measuring the number of working days lost, account is taken of the time lost in the basic working week by workers both directly and indirectly involved at the establishments where the dispute occurred; workers indirectly involved are those who are not themselves parties to the dispute but are unable to work as a result of the dispute. Overtime work is not included and neither is weekend working where this is not normal. Allowance is made for public and known annual holidays — for example, factory fortnights.In disputes where an employer dismisses his employees and replaces them with another work force, it is assumed that no further working days are being lost once the new work force is recruited.

Environment

Local Authority Housing

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list in the Official Report details of money held back from use by local authorities in England for housing purposes through the capital receipts limitation imposed at the present time; and if he will make a statement.

Information about local authorities' accumulated capital receipts is available only in respect of the position on 31 March 1985. At that time, the total spending power theoretically available to authorities in England, from their accumulated housing receipts was £4·1 billion but £1·3 billion of this had been used for purposes such as debt repayment. All accumulated receipts are available over time to permit additional capital expenditure, but the Government have set limits on the rate at which they can be used for this purpose, so as to minimise adverse effects on the public sector borrowing requirement.

Housing Investment Programme

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list in the Official Report the bids submitted for housing investment programmes since 1981 and the respective allocation made in each case.

In their housing investment programme submissions local authorities are asked to specify the total programme of capital expenditure they propose to undertake in the relevant year. The figures are therefore intended to cover not only expenditure financed from allocations, but also the very considerable amount of expenditure financed from other sources. Proposed programmes and allocations for the years 1981–82 to 1986–87 have been as follows:

£ million
Proposed ProgrammesAllocations
1981–82*2,9171,795
1982–83†2,9682,192
1983–843,5592,233
1984–854,4811,853
1985–864,8681,600
1986–875,4161,465
All figures are in cash terms unless otherwise indicated.
* November 1979 prices.
† November 1980 prices.

Urban Development

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what appraisal his Department has undertaken to assess how far, and in what respect, housing projects for which urban development grant aid has been provided have helped urgent local housing needs; and what information is available to his Department concerning the proportion of dwellings provided under such projects which have been (a) let, or (b) sold under a low cost home ownership scheme, or (c) sold at open market value to (1) homeless households, (2) households registered on local authority waiting lists, (3) households registered on local authority transfer lists and (4) first-time buyers.

All housing projects which have been supported by urban development grant (UDG) have been approved on the basis that the dwellings concerned would be sold or let under assured tenancies at full market value. Information about the personal circumstances of purchasers is not available at present but some housing projects are included in current research into the impact of UDG.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment according to what criteria his Department assesses whether housing projects submitted by local authorities for urban development grant aid would be economically unviable were such grant aid not made available; and what appraisal his Department has undertaken to evaluate whether, when urban development grant aid has been provided for housing projects, it has in practice proved essential for their execution.

All applications for urban development grant (UDG) receive a detailed development appraisal in order to establish whether the project could

AppraiserFirmPeriod of secondment
D. BarkerNorwich Union Insurance GroupOctober 1982—April 1983
J Cooper*Hillier Parker May & RowdenOctober 1982—April 1983
P. HillingAuthur Young McClelland Moores & Co.October 1982—October 1983

or would not proceed without grant. Research into the outcome of a representative sample of completed UDG projects is under way.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list any housing projects for which urban development grant aid has been provided where the local authority has clawed back profits from the developer under the terms of grant aid and list in each case (a) the profit allowed to the developer under the terms of the grant before clawback, (b) the profit clawed back by the local authority and (c) the profit retained by the developer.

Almost all offers of urban development grant for housing projects have included conditions requiring grant to be repaid to the local authority if during the period between grant approval and the completion of the project house prices increase more rapidly than building costs. It is not the practice to disclose financial details of individual projects, but clawback conditions are known to have come into operation in five cases.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list any housing project for which urban development grant aid has been provided where the developers' approved expenses for the project have included (a) the provision of white goods in the dwellings, (b) the establishment of a show house and the running expenses for a sales office and (c) advertising and agent fees for the dwellings; and if he will list in each case the reasons why his Department judged such expenses to merit urban development grant aid.

Urban development grant is not paid in respect of specific items of expenditure but rather to cover the gap between the total costs that the developer will have to incur in order to carry out the project and the estimated value of the completed project. Housing projects invariably involve marketing expenses and some projects have included "White goods" packages. Such expenditure would normally reduce rather than increase the grant requirement because it enables the completed housing to be sold sooner or at a higher price than would otherwise be the case.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will list those firms from which members of his Department's urban development grant appraisal team have been seconded, the members seconded, and the periods of their secondment;(2) if he will list any former members of his Department's urban development grant appraisal team who to his knowledge have subsequently been employed as consultants by local authorities wishing to submit urban development grant applications.

The following have been or are members of the Department's urban development grant appraisal team whilst on secondment to the Department:

Appraiser

Firm

Period of secondment

A. H. Mallinson*Thomson McLintock AssociatesOctober 1982—March 1984
J. F. Reid*Costain Group Ltd.April 1983—March 1985
N. F. SmithDrivers JonasMay 1983—May 1984
T. A. S. Russell*King & Co.July 1983—January 1985
R. N. C. CowleyPeat Marwick Mitchell & Co.August 1983—December 1984
M. C. GlosterGrimley & SonMay 1984—August 1985
M. J. BarringtonSpicer and PeglerOctober 1984—July 1986
N. J. SadlerRichard EllisJanuary 1985—March 1986
A. G. ViningJohn Laing Construction Ltd.April 1985—April 1987
G. M. SeeffStoy Hayward AssociatesJuly 1986—to be determined.

* Former appraisers known to have acted for local authorities in connection with applications, or prospective applications, for Urban Development Grant.

There is in general no restriction on former appraisers or their firms acting for local authorities or other persons in connection with applications for urban development grant, but the terms of secondments preclude former appraisers from getting involved in any way with projects which were before the Department during their periods of secondment.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether his Department has received a copy of the recent report by the district auditor to members of Langbaurgh borough council, drawing attention to the financial implications of their decision to dispose of part of the Spencerbeck housing estate to Barratt (Urban Renewal Northern) Ltd for refurbishment for sale with urban development grant aid; and what steps his Department plans to take to ensure that in future before urban development grant aid is approved for such projects, that the short and long term financial implications of the disposal of its housing stock for refurbishment for sale have been fully appraised.

The Department has not received a copy of the auditor's report. It is for local authorities to assess the impact that disposals for sale will have on their housing revenue accounts.

Public Buildings And Works (Expenditure)

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what proportion of annual expenditure on public buildings and works is spent in the south of England, defined as south of a line from Bristol to the Wash.

Council House Building

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what proportion of council house building in (a) England and Wales and (b) Scotland was represented by (i) public direct labour schemes and (ii) private contractors' schemes in the period 1982 to 1984.

In the period 1982 to 1984 it is estimated that for England and Wales the proportion of council house building, measured in current values, carried out by direct labour organisations was about 8 per cent. and by private contractors 92 per cent. For Scotland the corresponding figures were 2 per cent. and 98 per cent.

Nursing And Rest Homes

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list for each local authority in England the total amount of rate relief granted under the Government's obligations to provide reimbursement of 90 per cent. of such relief to (a) registered nursing homes and (b) registered rest homes.

Information is not available for particular types of premises receiving rate relief under the Rating (Disabled Persons) Act 1978. Figures are given for the amount of relief for all institutions, and the amount reimbursed to the local authority by my Department, for each local rating authority in England for the latest available year, 1984–85. In some cases the figures are still subject to audit.

Subsidy to Local Authority (90 per cent.)Benefit paid by Local Authority (100 per cent.)
Adur65,07972,310
Allerdale55,76461,960
Alnwick19,97722,197
Amber Valley54,02260,024
Arun206,869229,855
Ashfield109,900122,111
Ashford53,51659,462
Aylesbury Vale121,008134,453
Babergh60,12366,803
Barking and Dagenham167,787186,430
Barnet371,374412,638
Barnsley168,134186,816
Barrow in Furness61,51468,349
Basildon43,27548,083
Basingstoke and Deane58,74065,267
Bassetlaw71,79079,767
Bath141,132156,813
Berwick upon Tweed15,98617,762
Beverley93,646104,051
Bexley89,06198,957
Birmingham451,353501,503
Blaby10,54411,716
Blackburn157,738175,264
Blackpool181,251201,390
Blyth Valley38,56742,853
Bolsover29,54032,822
Bolton181,633201,814
Boothferry33,37737,086
Boston23,89426,549
Bournemouth398,103442,337
Bracknell77,28885,876
Bradford501,777557,530
Braintree78,42587,139
Breckland44,04148,934
Brent486,729540,810
Brentwood24,71027,455
Bridgnorth30,83734,263

Subsidy to Local Authority (90 per cent.)

Benefit paid by Local Authority (100 per cent.)

Brighton227,886253,206
Bristol666,384740,427
Broadland56,95863,287
Bromley229,131254,590
Bromsgrove113,545126,161
Broxbourne45,47150,523
Broxtowe70,75978,621
Burnley95,213105,792
Bury214,348238,164
Calderdale161,006178,896
Cambridge83,37192,635
Camden453,570503,967
Cannock Chase28,62631,807
Canterbury127,204141,338
Caradon39,90944,343
Carlisle100,280111,422
Carrick59,25565,838
Castle Morpeth85,70895,231
Castle Point46,73751,930
Charnwood76,80785,341
Chelmsford37,11641,240
Cheltenham125,537139,486
Cherwell60,77667,529
Chester80,90689,895
Chester le Street24,00126,668
Chesterfield55,09661,218
Chichester139,961155,512
Chiltern179,636199,596
Chorley61,01067,789
Christchurch31,07934,532
Cleethorpes23,56126,179
Colchester21,11423,460
Congleton44,75649,729
Copeland56,73163,034
Corby27,69630,773
Cotswold54,48060,533
Coventry450,517500,574
Craven41,94846,609
Crawley51,81757,574
Crewe and Nantwich119,596132,884
Croydon297,193330,214
Dacorum106,509118,343
Darlington134,916149,907
Dartford62,43769,375
Daventry19,86322,070
Derby102,659114,066
Derwentside75,59183,990
Doncaster269,246299,162
Dover80,78689,762
Dudley211,496234,996
Durham70,76278,624
Ealing285,154316,838
Easington54,95661,062
East Cambridgeshire23,14825,720
East Devon124,882138,758
East Hampshire127,534141,704
East Hertfordshire157,471174,968
East Lindsey88,81698,685
East Northamptonshire15,66417,404
East Staffordshire60,14066,822
East Yorkshire95,706106,340
Eastbourne130,989145,543
Eastleigh55,14061,267
Eden35,90239,891
Ellesmere Port58,73465,260
Elmbridge118,884132,093
Enfield202,147224,608
Epping Forest102,183113,537
Epsom and Ewell44,18649,095
Erewash101,657112,952
Exeter202,296224,773
Fareham44,53149,479
Fenland55,69261,880
Forest Heath16,77818,642
Forest of Dean58,06064,511

Subsidy to Local Authority (90 per cent.)

Benefit paid by Local Authority (100 per cent.)

Fylde86,34495,938
Gateshead213,615237,350
Gedling72,92581,028
Gillingham31,49234,991
Glanford52,05957,843
Gloucester64,30271,447
Gosport37,11341,237
Gravesham33,65337,392
Great Grimsby62,06668,962
Great Yarmouth47,69752,997
Greenwich266,228295,809
Guildford123,970137,744
Hackney355,967395,519
Halton92,255102,505
Hambleton47,84953,166
Hammersmith and Fulham198,726220,807
Harborough39,36343,737
Haringey324,521360,579
Harlow40,31344,792
Harrogate212,215235,795
Harrow172,427191,585
Hart39,80444,227
Hartlepool65,39772,663
Hastings128,417142,686
Havant62,96769,963
Havering159,954177,727
Hereford78,42787,141
Hertsmere145,281161,423
High Peak61,69168,546
Hillingdon306,220340,244
Hinckley and Bosworth30,76034,178
Holderness29,61432,905
Horsham136,694151,882
Hounslow191,088212,320
Hove267,530297,256
Huntingdon54,58560,650
Hyndburn64,65171,835
Ipswich87,90897,675
Isles of Scilly00
Islington312,726347,474
Rennet43,21348,015
Kensington and Chelsea252,170280,189
Kerrier88,64898,498
Kettering57,86564,295
King's Lynn and West Norfolk55,31261,458
Kingston upon Hull294,032326,702
Kingston upon Thames110,722123,024
Kingswood60,46067,177
Kirklees228,193253,548
Knowsley104,535116,150
Lambeth580,361644,845
Lancaster133,210148,011
Langbaurgh64,68771,875
Leeds562,514625,016
Leicester220,623245,137
Leominster43,70648,562
Lewes176,085195,650
Lewisham313,905348,783
Lichfield84,06993,410
Lincoln75,99284,435
Liverpool666,315740,350
London City00
Luton00
Macclesfield175,386194,874
Maidstone40,14244,602
Maldon23,50426,116
Malvern Hills119,954133,282
Manchester809,666899,629
Mansfield119,925133,250
Medina57,78864,209
Melton21,52923,921
Mendip63,06070,067
Merton94,500105,000

Subsidy to Local Authority (90 per cent.)

Benefit paid by Local Authority (100 per cent.)

Mid Bedfordshire83,93693,262
Mid Devon50,77456,415
Mid Suffolk41,78246,425
Mid Sussex129,043143,381
Middlesbrough91,162101,291
Milton Keynes57,11163,457
Mole Valley175,800195,333
New Forest125,516139,462
Newark and Sherwood18,28520,317
Newbury78,46187,179
Newcastle under Lyme80,37389,303
Newcastle upon Tyne612,601680,668
Newham272,972303,302
North Bedfordshire102,726114,140
North Cornwall51,28456,982
North Devon86,07095,633
North Dorset37,96142,179
North East Derbyshire3,9034,337
North Hertfordshire75,90484,338
North Kesteven51,36557,072
North Norfolk93,095103,439
North Shropshire29,97533,306
North Tyneside242,204269,115
North Warwickshire45,82050,911
North West Leicestershire37,08441,205
North Wiltshire109,198121,331
Northampton382,460424,955
Northavon107,753119,726
Norwich125,963139,959
Nottingham515,976573,307
Nuneaton and Bedworth70,34678,162
Oadby and Wigston45,54950,610
Oldham278,483309,426
Oswestry29,50732,786
Oxford131,145145,717
Pendle44,94049,934
Penwith43,62748,474
Peterborough136,838152,042
Plymouth194,101215,668
Poole193,020214,467
Portsmouth207,919231,021
Preston99,345110,383
Purbeck51,97457,749
Reading120,233133,592
Redbridge174,045193,383
Redditch35,31439,237
Reigate and Banstead202,045224,494
Restormel78,17286,858
Ribble Valley46,24051,378
Richmond upon Thames153,070170,078
Richmondshire25,58128,424
Rochdale208,340231,489
Rochester on Medway37,39741,552
Rochford27,40730,452
Rossendale31,56135,068
Rother142,463158,292
Rotherham218,506242,785
Rugby92,216102,462
Runnymede35,46339,403
Rushcliffe96,759107,510
Rushmoor32,15235,724
Rutland26,94129,935
Ryedale30,62034,022
Salford228,048253,387
Salisbury85,83195,367
Sandwell204,300227,000
Scarborough175,365194,850
Scunthorpe41,17245,747
Sedgefield71,06778,963
Sedgemoor89,42199,357
Sefton423,753470,837
Selby27,07230,080
Sevenoaks130,266144,740
Sheffield851,583946,203

Subsidy to Local Authority (90 per cent.)

Benefit paid by Local Authority (100 per cent.)

Shepway109,196121,329
Shrewsbury and Atcham97,249108,054
Slough74,11282,347
Solihull152,053168,948
South Bedforshire86,09995,666
South Bucks78,28986,988
South Cambridgeshire191,177212,419
South Derbyshire18,43120,479
South Hams68,88476,538
South Herefordshire21,82124,246
South Holland44,13949,043
South Kesteven48,04153,379
South Lakeland84,64394,048
South Norfolk19,58421,760
South Northamptonshire8,6309,589
South Oxfordshire122,269135,855
South Ribble58,54065,044
South Shropshire32,41136,012
South Somerset106,408118,231
South Staffordshire60,14766,830
South Tyneside145,852162,058
South Wight54,72060,800
Southampton179,284199,204
Southend on Sea269,638299,598
Southwark517,500575,000
Spelthornc60,22366,914
St. Albans140,964156,627
St. Edmundsbury61,51368,348
St. Helens185,206205,784
Stafford90,980101,089
Staffordshire Moorlands70,04977,832
Stevenage83,79193,102
Stockport265,046294,495
Stockton on Tees40,15944,621
Stoke on Trent346,150384,611
Stratford on Avon79,15587,950
Stroud106,775118,639
Suffolk Coastal54,25660,284
Sunderland357,947397,719
Surrey Heath73,82282,025
Sutton120,298133,664
Swale43,12347,914
Tameside160,943178,826
Tamworth21,11723,463
Tandridge127,808142,009
Taunton Deane83,55692,840
Teesdale10,28011,423
Teignbridge144,465160,517
Tendering184,677205,197
Test Valley136,607151,786
Tewkesbury45,59850,665
Thamesdown128,407142,674
Thanet192,246213,607
Three Rivers84,98394,426
Thurrock42,35047,056
Tonbridge and Mailing127,616141,795
Torbay253,420281,578
Torridge20,62822,920
Tower Hamlets213,856237,618
Trafford146,853163,170
Tunbridge Wells121,673135,192
Tynedale53,27459,193
Uttlesford60,72367,470
Vale of White Horse64,40771,563
Vale Royal115,356128,174
Wakefield241,544268,382
Walsall240,566267,296
Waltham Forest128,546142,829
Wandsworth304,764338,627
Wansbeck66,46273,847
Wansdyke73,24781,385
Warrington99,233110,259
Warwick130,261144,734
Watford69,02676,696
Waveney84,78494,205

Subsidy to Local Authority (90 per cent.)

Benefit paid by Local Authority (100 per cent.)

Waverley172,839192,044
Wealden106,948118,831
Wear Valley33,43437,148
Wellingborough66,48773,874
Welwyn Hatfield102,940114,378
West Derbyshire37,13841,264
West Devon39,60444,004
West Dorset76,16484,626
West Lancashire60,81367,570
West Lindsey58,90165,446
West Oxfordshire70,11077,901
West Somerset32,18435,760
West Wiltshire59,53966,155
Westminster453,326503,696
Weymouth and Portland73,68181,868
Wigan316,800352,000
Wimborne45,74750,830
Winchester124,139137,932
Windsor and Maidenhead120,230133,589
Wirral202,313224,792
Woking67,34974,832
Wokingham141,528157,253
Wolverhampton662,935736,595
Woodspring241,899268,776
Worcester102,165113,517
Worthing205,136227,929
Wrekin83,94893,275
Wychavon78,87187,635
Wycombe64,80072,000
Wyre69,03876,709
Wyre Forest92,675102,972
York97,472108,302
Totals46,235,75651,373,067

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the working of the Rating (Disabled Persons) Act 1978 in so far as it relates to the relief from rates of registered nursing homes and registered rest homes.

The Rating (Disabled Persons) Act 1978 was amended by the Rates Act 1984. As amended, section 2 provides for full or partial rate relief for institutions accepted by the local rating authority as being used wholly or predominantly for specified purposes, mainly the accommodation or employment of ill or disabled people.Nursing homes, rest homes and similar premises fall within the scope of the relief when they are used wholly or predominantly to provide residential nursing and domestic care for people who are or have been suffering from illness or who are disabled, but not if their clients are there solely because of factors such as age, being otherwise fit. No distinction is drawn between public sector and private sector institutions. Last year, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Social Services strengthened the regulatory and inspection procedures for such institutions under the provisions of the Registered Homes Act 1984.To minimise the effect on local resources, particularly in areas where such premises are concentrated, my Department reimburses to local authorities 90 per cent. of the amount of the relief. The remaining 10 per cent. is taken into account when block grant entitlement is calculated.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has as to how many cases relating to the Rating (Disabled Persons) Act 1978 have been heard in the High Court since the Act came into operation; and what effect the outcome of these cases has had on the working of the legislation.

I am aware of six cases. Only two of them have affected the operation of the Act: Morgan v. Windsor and Maidenhead Royal Borough Council and Glenherne Nursing Services Ltd. v. Same, heard together in 1981. The judgment clarified the meanings of "care" and "illness" defined in section 2 of the Act in such a way as to bring within its scope premises providing for those who, as a result of illness or disability, could no longer live at home. A number of local authority and privately-run institutions which had previously been thought not be eligible have since successfully applied for relief.

Local Government Finance

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish, for each class of local authority and for local authorities in total, the percentage of increase in current expenditure in cash between (a) 1978–79 and 1986–87 and (b) 1981–82 and 1986–87.

The information based on returns made by English authorities is as follows:

Percentage changes in net current expenditure
Class of authority1978–79 to 1986–871981–82 to 1986–87
Shire counties*114·738·1
Metropolitan areas†118·536·5
ILEA128·540·9
Metropolitan police193·552·7
Greater London area‡121·341·3
Shire districts||101·140·8
England118·338·9
*Northumbria police authority expenditure is included in shire counties in 1978–79, 1981–82 but in the metropolitan area in 1986–87.
†Comprising MCC's and metropolitan districts in 1978–79. 1981–82 and metropolitan districts and joint metropolitan authorities for fire, transport and police (including the Northumbria police authority) in 1986–87.
‡Comprising GLC (excluding ILEA) City, inner and outer London boroughs in 1978–79,1981 -82; inner and outer boroughs and London fire and civil defence in 1986–87.
║Including Isles of Scilly.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will rank in descending order, using their 1986–87 budgets, all English local authorities on the basis of the percentage above or below their grant-related expenditure assessments for 1986–87.

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will place in the Library copies of expenditure performance and growth tables for 1981–82 to 1986–87, showing also the figures from 1978–79 to 1986–87.

Faslane Bay

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he is now in a position to make a statement about dredging in Faslane bay and the means by which he intends to dispose of the waste, and in particular that part of it which is contaminated with asbestos.

[pursuant to his answer, 30 June 1986, c. 361–62]: The contract for dredging in Faslane bay was not in fact let on that day but will be let shortly.

Mortgage Repossessions

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has as to how many mortgage repossessions have taken place in each of the years 1979 to 1985 in (a) England, (b) Scotland and (c) Wales; and if he will make a statement.

[pursuant to his answer, 1 July 1986, c. 459]: Information is available only in respect of England and Wales and cannot be shown separately for the two countries. The following figures include both domestic and non-domestic premises, and do not refer to domestic premises only, as stated in the heading to the table in my reply to the hon. Member for Fulham (Mr. Raynsford) of 10 June at column 129.

County Court Actions for recover), of possession: mortgage possessions: Warrants executed, England and Wales
Number
19792,460
19802,540
19813,480
19823,700
19835,080
19847,960
198510,160

Source: Lord Chancellor's Department.

Housing Associations

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) how many homes were owned for rental by housing associations in England and Wales at the latest available date; and what were the figures for the same period for each of the last three years;(2) how many homes have been built by housing associations for sale or shared ownership in each of the last three years;(3) what is the total number of homes owned by the housing associations at the latest available date; and what were the figures for the same period for each of the last three years.

[pursuant to his answer, 3 July 1986]: The available information for England is as follows:

Housing associations: England
thousands
Estimated Stock of Dwellings for rent at end of yearSales for shared ownership in year*
19824322
19834517
19844743
1985†4934
* Built for sale, "shared ownership of the shell" and "do-it-yourself shared ownership", including leasehold schemes for the elderly.
Source: Housing Corporation.
† Provisional.

Co-ownership and shared ownership housing association dwellings are included)n the owner-occupied stock statistics and are not separately identified.

For information on housing associations in Wales, I refer the right hon. Member to my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales.

Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

Swine Fever

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what consideration he has given to the imposition of import restrictions on possible sources of swine fever; what recent discussions he has had with other European Community countries to seek to improve the effectiveness of measures designed to combat the disease; and if he will make a statement.

Measures for eradicating classical swine fever and rules for preventing its spread by intraCommunity trade in pigs, fresh pigmeat and pigmeat products are the subject of Community directives. Representations have been made to me that I should take national action to restrict imports of certain pigmeat products. However, although the source of all hut the most recent outbreak has been linked directly or indirectly to the feeding to pigs of imported pigmeat products, it is impossible to say from which country the infected imports came. In present circumstances I am advised that we would not be justified in making use of the relevant safeguard clause to impose additional restrictions and that any attempt to do so would be legally unsound, and would be overruled in Brussels.I am, however, in touch with the Commissioner for Agriculture in the European Commission to underline the Government's serious concern at the classical swine fever situation which has existed in other member states for a number of years. I am urging on him the need for more stringent measures to be applied in the Community to stamp out disease when it occurs, and for a fresh assessment to be made of the degree of processing required to render pigmeat products safe. Officials are also pursuing these matters in the standing veterinary committee and direct with the member states concerned.

Radiation

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will publish a report on his Department's reaction to the Chernobyl emergency with particular reference to its state of readiness to monitor radioactive fallout from any source, the suitability of the relevant resources and contingency plans and the need for national and international agencies to adopt common and comprehensible measurements of contamination and standards of safety for exposure to or ingestion of contaminated materials.

No. I am satisfied that my Department's contingency plans enabled us to detect immediately the presence of radioactivity arising from the accident at Chernobyl, and to make a prompt and realistic assessment of its implications for food and agriculture. The safety levels applied in the United Kingdom were agreed by the Government on the advice of the National Radiological Protection Board and are derived from recommendations published by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Discussions were held on 22–23 May by a group of Community scientists under article 31 of the Euratom treaty to discuss the trigger level for Community control measures, and my officials will be considering how best to participate in any work following up the European Council's consideration of the need for tolerance levels to be set on a scientific basis within the appropriate international fora.

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in how many instances readings of 1,000 becquerels per kilogram or higher have been found in vegetables following the Chernobyl disaster; and what action his Department took in consequence.

[pursuant to his reply, 1 July 1986, c. 514]: One result from Cumbria relating to a mixed sample of cabbages and leeks taken on 8 May 1986 showed the combined radiocaesium level of 1165 Bq/kg. This was a transient contamination and well below the level at which action would need to be considered. Subsequent results for the monitoring of vegetables in the area showed lower levels of caesium.

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will place in the Library the results of radioactivity monitoring on cows milk, sheep milk, sheep and vegetables for May 1985 for Cleveland, Cumbria, Durham and Northumberland.

[pursuant to his reply, 2 July 1986, c. 572]: My Department's terrestrial monitoring programme commenced in January 1986. No data are therefore available for the period requested for milk, meat and vegetables. This complements the environmental monitoring programme conducted by nuclear site operators as a condition of their licence under the Radioactive Substances Act 1960. The results of this monitoring are published annually by the site operators.

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he increased the monitoring of vegetables in Cumbria following the discovery of readings of 1100 bq/kg of caesium 137 and 895 bq/kg of iodine 131 on cabbages and leeks in Cumbria on 9 May.

[pursuant to his reply, 2 July 1986, c. 572]: The readings of 1100 bq/kg of caesium 137 and 895 bq/kg of iodine 131 found in cabbages and leeks in Cumbria on 8 May represented a transient contamination well below the level at which action would need to be considered. Subsequent results for the monitoring of vegetables in the area showed lower levels of caesium.

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is his advice regarding the safety of eating whimberries, wild bilberries, wild raspberries and black berries growing in north Wales or the lake district, as well as garden fruits, in the light of radioactive fallout in May in those areas.

[pursuant to his reply, 2 July 1986, c. 572]: Levels of radioactivity in all crops tested are now extremely low in all parts of the country. However, we are continuing to test commercial fruits and wild berries as they come into season to ensure they are safe for human consumption.

Sheepmeat (Caesium Levels)

asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, for the area of Cumbria in which there is a ban on the movement of lamb, what is (a) the total lamb population, (b) the total number of lambs sampled on each occasion a sample is taken to test for radioactivity, (c) an analysis of the radioactivity levels by convenient range of radioactivity within these samples for each day on which testing has taken place since 1 May.

The information requested is as follows:

  • (a) approximately 400,000 lambs under one year of age are in the designated area in Cumbria.
  • (b) Ministry staff have been taking 100 to 200 lambs per week for testing within the designated area since the introduction of the emergency order on 20 June. All animals taken as samples are analysed for radioactivity.
  • (c) Information on the number of samples taken and the results obtained were published by my Department in a press notice on 20 June, a copy of which is in the Library of the House. The results of further monitoring will be published by my Department on a regular basis.
  • Butter

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the total value of the subsidy on open market butter purchased by non-profit-making organisations during 1985.

    [pursuant to his reply, 2 July 1986, c. 571]: The amount of subsidy paid in 1985 on open market butter purchased by non-profit-making organisations was £5·689 million.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the subsidy on each 250 gramme packet of butter on the open market purchased by non-profit-making organisations during 1985.

    [pursuant to his reply, 2 July 1986, c. 57]: During 1985 the subsidy on open market butter purchased by non-profit-making organisations was 24p per 250 gramme pack from January to May and 23p per 250 gramme pack from June to December.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what percentage of non-profit-making organisations have claimed the subsidy on butter purchased on the open market; and if he will make a statement.

    [pursuant to his reply, 2 July 1986, c. 571]: I regret this information is not available. Records are kept only of those non-profit-making organisations claiming subsidy under Commission regulation 2191/81. We have no means of establishing the total number of organisations which might be eligible to apply.

    Fish Quotas

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what are the present European Community quotas for each type of fish imposed on the sea-fishing industries of each of the member states; and which of the quotas have been exceeded to date.

    [pursuant to his reply, 3 July 1986]: The information regarding quotas is set out in the annexes to the following Council regulations:(a)

    Community Waters

    • Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3721/85 dated 20 December 1985
    • Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3777/85 dated 31 December 1985

    (b) External Waters

    • Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3551/85 dated 12 December 1985
    • Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3725/85 dated 20 December 1985
    • Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3730/85 dated 20 December 1985
    • Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3732/85 dated 20 December 1985
    • Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3783/85 dated 31 December 1985
    • Council Regulation (EEC) No. 114/86 dated 20 January 1986 extended the validity of Regulations (EEC) Nos. 3721/85, 3730/85, 3734/85 and 3777/85 until 31 December 1986.

    The regulations were published in the Official Journals of the European Communities, Nos. L 339 of 18 December 1985, L 361 and L 363 of 31 December 1985 and L 17 of 23 January 1986, copies of which are available in the Library.

    Official catch returns by member states are made available by the Commission of the European Communities on a monthly basis. The most recent figures, covering the period January to April 1986, indicate that the following quotas have been exceeded:

  • (a) Netherlands: Cod in I.C.E.S. Areas VII (excluding Vita) and VIII (EC zone)
  • (b) Netherlands: Whiting in I.C.E.S. Area VII (excluding VIIa)
  • (c) Germany: Saithe in I.C.E.S. Areas Vb(EC zone) and VI.
  • Further fishing by vessels of these two countries for the stocks concerned have been prohibited by Commission regulation.

    United Kingdom catch returns are available for the period January to May 1986 and they show that no quotas have been exceeded.

    Fish Sizes

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what steps are being taken by Her Majesty's Government and other European Governments to ensure that no fish below the minimum size allowed to be caught are fished in European waters.

    [pursuant to his reply, 3 July 1986]: In its report of 16 June 1986 to the Council of the European Communities, the Commission has underlined the need for effective enforcement of the total allowable catch/quota system and the technical conservation measures if the common fisheries policy is to work fairly. The Government fully endorses that approach.The report, which was laid before the House on 2 July (document 7717/86), has identified various shortcomings in the way some member states enforce control on undersized fish. The Commission intends, where the circumstances require, to undertake infringement proceedings against member states in the European Court.The United Kingdom is regarded as having effectively discharged its enforcement obligations, although we are criticised for taking little action on the landing of undersized nephrops tails in Northern Ireland. We will be discussing this criticism with the Commission to determine what further measures, if any, are necessary.

    Persistent Plastics (Dumping Convention)

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what methods are being used by Her Majesty's Government to monitor the effectiveness of the London and Oslo dumping convention in respect of persistent plastics.

    [pursuant to his reply, 3 July 1986]: The effectiveness of these conventions is regularly reviewed by member countries on the basis of statistical data and scientific assessment of the state of the sea. Both organisations recognise that persistent plastics enter the sea mainly from coastal tipping, littering, or from ships' garbage, and not from sea dumping as such.

    Social Services

    Supplementary Benefit

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what was the number of supplementary benefit claimants, and the value of the claims, for claimants (a) under 26 years and (b) 26 years and over in receipt of the no fixed abode allowance for 1981, and in each subsequent year to the latest convenient date.

    Separate statistical information on this subject is not maintained and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. However, our monitoring of the impact of the 1985 boarder changes does not show any evidence of general increases in homelessness among young people attributable to those changes.

    Pensions

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will estimate the additional full-year costs of advancing the date of qualification for retirement pension to the beginning of the week within which the qualifying birthday falls.

    To advance the date of qualification for state retirement pension in this way would entail paying pensions for periods for which no entitlement exists, because the qualifying birthday is the minimum age at which state retirement pension becomes payable. The gross full year cost would be in the order of £20 million on the benefit rates applicable from July 1986.

    Housing Benefit

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people in Burnley at the latest date for which figures are available were receiving (a) rate rebates, (b) rent rebates and (c) rent allowances; and how many of these are certificated claims.

    On the basis of information from Burnley borough council's latest subsidy claim_ it is estimated that the average number of people in receipt of rate rebate, rent rebate and rent allowance is:

    Rent rebate

    Rent allowance

    Rate rebate

    Certificated2,9301,0506,260
    Standard2,3305704,640
    Total5,2601,62010,900

    Unemployment Benefits

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, for the latest year for which figures are available, what is the total number of unemployed people who, during the course of the year, exhausted their unemployment benefit entitlement but were not subsequently eligible for supplementary allowance.

    The precise information requested is not available, but it is estimated that of those who exhaust their entitlement to unemployment benefit something like 15 to 20 per cent. are not subsequently eligible for supplementary allowance.

    Hospital Schemes

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will identify and list in the Official Report (a) the hospital schemes started and completed since May 1979, and (b) the hospital schemes of more than £2 million now being planned, designed or constructed; and if he will give the costs of all these schemes in (a) and (b).

    The information held centrally is as follows. Cost estimates for schemes in planning and design are not published in advance of the invitation to tender.

    Table A
    Hospital schemes started and completed since May 1979 each with a building and engineering cost of over £2 million
    Regional Health Authority and SchemeEstimated total cost £ million
    Northern
    Fenham Blood Transfusion Service Centre4·6
    Hartlepool District General Hospital Scheme 1 Phase 15·9
    North Tyneside Scheme 1 Phase 113·5
    Queen Elizabeth Gateshead Scheme 1 Phase 17·9
    Yorkshire
    Staincliffe District General Hospital Energy Centre4·0
    Trent
    Bassetlaw District General Hospital Phase 16·3
    Glenfield District General Hospital Phase 116·0
    Leicester General MIU3·4
    Lincoln County Phase 111·7
    Northern General Phase 1c7·9
    Rotherham District General Hospital Phase 28·5
    East Anglian
    Addenbrookes Geriatric Unit4·7
    West Suffolk Bury St. Edmunds Stage 12·3
    Great Yarmouth District General Hospital 25·4
    Hinchingbrooke Hospital Huntingdon Phase 313·9
    Ipswich Phase 1 Heath Road Wing (Nucleus)8·0
    Rosie Maternity—Cambridge6·3
    North West Thames
    Charing Cross Hospital North Block5·1
    Lister Maternity Unit (Nucleus)3·4
    St. Charles Hospital4·2
    St. Mary's W2 Phase 1A3·3

    Regional Health Authority and Scheme

    Estimated total cost £ million

    Watford (Shrodells Wing) Phase 317·5

    North East Thames

    Broomfield Phase 39·7
    Clacton district Phase 1 Stage 1 and 23·7
    Colchester District General Hospital Phase 214·3
    Colchester District General Hospital Phase 3 Residential3·3
    Homerton Hospital Phase 118·5
    Newham Hospital Phase 1 (Nucleus)11·8
    Newham Hospital Phase 2 (Nucleus)5·6

    South East Thames

    Archery House40
    Kent and Sussex-Tunbridge Wells Phase 16·6
    Orpington Hospital Phase 18·0
    Maidstone District General Hospital Phase 1 (Nucleus)14·0

    South West Thames

    Croydon Mayday District General Hospital (Nucleus)11·0
    Queen Mary's Roehampton Phase 14·0
    St. Georges Blocks G2 and F Phase 213·3

    Wessex

    Odstock Hospital Spinal Injuries Unit4·2
    Swindon Laundry3·3

    Oxford

    Milton Keynes District General Hospital Phase 116·4
    Wexham Park ENI2·9
    Wexham Park Maternity Unit6·1
    Wexham Park Paediatric Department and Stores2·8

    South Western

    Bristol Eye Hospital5·5
    Torbay District General Hospital Maternity Unit3·0

    West Midlands

    Bromsgrove Redditch District General Hospital Phase 120·5
    Kidderminster District General Hospital Phase 53·4
    New Cross Wolverhampton Wards and Theatres2·7
    New Cross Wolverhampton Wards 1 and 24·0
    St. Georges Stafford Phase 22·8

    Mersey

    Halton District General Hospital Phase 2 (Nucleus)7·9
    Macclesfield Development (Nucleus)11·4
    Regional Stores3·2

    North Western

    Hope Hospital Salford Phase 115·1
    Manchester Royal Infirmary Phase 13·1
    Blackpool Victoria Phase 44·5
    Fleetwood ESMI2·4
    Park Hospital Geriatric Rehabilitation3·4
    Regional Blood Transfusion Centre4·3
    Royal Lancaster Infirmary Phase 23·6

    Non Regional Health Authority

    Moorfield Eye Hospital City Road Development Phase 17·3

    Table B

    Hospital schemes over £2 million which are under construction

    Regional Health Authority and Scheme

    Estimated total cost £ million

    Northern

    Blyth Community Hospital and Health Centre5·5
    Freeman Hospital3·7
    Furness General Scheme 2 Phase 17·9

    Regional Health Authority and Scheme

    Estimated total cost £ million

    Hartlepool District General Hospital Scheme 3 Phase 13·1
    Jarrow Community Hospital4·3
    North Tyneside Scheme 2 Phase 15·4
    South Cleveland General Scheme 2 Phase IB8·0

    Yorkshire

    Bradford Royal Infirmary Nucleus Wards and Theatres3·0
    Bridlington New Community Hospital14·5
    Friarage Hospital Phase 1 (Nucleus)6·4
    Goole New Community Hospital12·6
    Regional Blood Transfusion Centre Seacroft Phase 12·8
    Scarborough District General Hospital Phase 1 (Nucleus)8·1
    Scunthorpe District General Hospital Phase 3A Service Centre5·3
    Staincliffe District General Hospital Phase 1 (Nucleus)17·1

    Trent

    Chesterfield and North Derby Royal Hospital Phase 2B8·1
    Derby City Phase 115·4
    Derby Royal Infirmary Phase 210·9
    Ilkeston Community Hospital5·9
    Kings Hill District General Hospital Phase 23·5
    Lincoln County MIU—Phase 1C3·3
    Lincoln County Phase 1A and 1B4·2
    Northern General Geriatric7·8
    Pilgrim (Boston)—Phase 33·4
    Victoria Mansfield—Phase 12·6

    East Anglian

    Ipswich Phase 3 Heath Road Wing (Nucleus)5·0
    Peterborough 2nd District General Hospital Phase 116·8

    North West Thames

    Hemel Hempstead Phase 17·7
    St. Marys W2 Phase 1B26·5

    North East Thames

    Harold Wood Hospital Phase 19·5
    North Middlesex—Kitchen, Dining and Geriatric Accommodation5·2
    Rochford Geriatric Wards5·1

    South East Thames

    Bassetts Residential Centre—MH Services4·8
    Buckland District General Hospital3·0
    Crystal Palace (Bowley Close)—MH Centre3·8
    Lewisham District General Hospital Phase 1A7·9
    Lewisham District General Hospital Phase 1B3·5

    South West Thames

    St. Georges' Block H Phase 2A22·0

    Wessex

    Andover Community Hospital4·0
    Bournemouth District General Hospital Phase 118·4
    Royal Hants County Winchester Phase 4 (Nucleus)11·6
    Royal South Hants Southampton Phase 312·9
    Royal United—Bath5·1
    St. Marys—Isle of Wight—Phase 3B (Nucleus)20·7
    West Dorset District General Hospital Phase 113·6

    Oxford

    Heatherwood MI/EMI4·8

    South Western

    Cheltenham General Phase 1B8·6
    West Somerset (Musgrove Park) District General Hospital Phase 17·6

    Regional Health Authority and Scheme

    Estimated total cost £ million

    Weston-Super-Mare New Hospital14·8

    West Midlands

    Cheadle New Geriatric Unit4·3
    City General Stoke Surgical Accommodation (Nucleus)17·7
    George Eliot Nuneaton Phase 2 (Nucleus)5·8
    Good Hope Phase 13·9
    Rubery Hill Regional Psych. Intensive Care Unit5·0
    Telford District General Hospital Phase 123·8
    Walsall Phases 4A and 4B (Nucleus)19·0
    Wordsley—Obstetrics5·9
    Walsgrave Radiotheraphy Treatment Unit3·9

    Mersey

    North Sefton District General Hospital Southport Phase 1 (Nucleus)21·5
    St. Catherine's Birkenhead Redevelopment Phase 13·8

    North Western

    Burmley General Hospital Phase 35·4
    Fairfield Phase 15·4
    Oldham District General Hospital Phase 116·6
    Queens Park Blackburn Phase 1 Paediatric4·0
    Royal Albert Edward Infirmary Wigan Phase 15·5
    Tameside General Phase 214·8

    Non Regional Health Authorities

    Hammersmith Hospital Redevelopment Phase 116·0

    Table C

    Hospital Schemes Over £2 million in design

    Regional Health Authority and Scheme

    Northern

    • Ashington Low Energy Hospital (Nucleus) Hartlepool DGH
    • Scheme 3 Phase 2
    • Kendal (Westmorland) General Scheme 1 Phases 1 & 2
    • Royal Victoria Infirmary Scheme 1 Phase 5
    • South Shields General Scheme 3 Phase 1

    Yorkshire

    • Scunthorpe DGH Phase 3B A&E Block
    • Scunthorpe DGH Phase 4B (1) Ward Block
    • St. James University Hospital Leeds New Renal Unit

    Trent

    • Bolsover Community Hospital Development
    • Coalville Community Hospital
    • Glenfield DGH Phase 2
    • Kings Mill DGH Phase 3
    • Leicester Royal Infirmary Phase 4B

    N. W. Thames

    • Central Middlesex Psychiatric Unit
    • St. Albans City Hospital Development Phase 2

    N.E. Thames

    • St. Ann's Geriatric Unit
    • Whipps Cross Phase 1
    • Whittington Redevelopment Phase 1

    S.E. Thames

    • Eastbourne New DGH Phase 2
    • Eastbourne New DGH Pre-Phase 2
    • Hastings DGH Main Phase
    • Hastings DGH Pre-Phase Works
    • Hastings DGH Residence & Education
    • Medway DGH Phase 3B
    • Medway DGH Phase 3c
    • St. Thomas Hospital—South Wing

    SW Thames

    • Mid Sussex Phase 1
    • Royal Surrey County Guildford Phase 2

    Wessex

    • Royal United Bath—Operating Theatres

    Oxford

    • John Radcliffe—Phase 3
    • Milton Keynes DGH—MI Unit
    • Milton Keynes DGH—OPD
    • Milton Keynes DGH Phase 2

    S. Western

    • Frenchay DGH Phase 1
    • Gloucester Royal Phase 4B
    • Gloucester Royal Phase 4B Sub-Phases 1&2

    W. Midlands

    • Anchor Meadow Community Hospital
    • Bradwell New Geriatric Unit (Nucleus)
    • Cannock Community Hospital
    • Edward Street—Psychiatric/Geriatric
    • Good Hope Phase 2
    • Good Hope Phase 3
    • Queen Elizabeth Birmingham—Reg. Specialties/Labs
    • RJAH Wards and Theatres
    • Rowley Regis Community Hospital Sandwell
    • Warwick DGH—Phase 1 (Nucleus)

    Mersey

    • Alder Hey—Child Health Institute
    • Broadgreen Development Phase 1
    • St. Helens Redevelopment Phase 1 Boiler House
    • Warrington DGH Phase 1

    North Western

    • Bolton DGH ESMI and Geriatric Unit
    • Bolton DGH Manufacturing Pharmacy and HSDU
    • Bolton DGH Phase 1
    • Fairfield Catering and HSDU
    • Fylde Community Hospital
    • Leigh Infirmary Phase 1
    • Manchester Royal Infirmary Phase 2
    • Manchester Royal Infirmary Service Complex
    • North Manchester General Boiler House
    • Peel Hall ESMI
    • Pendle Community Hospital
    • Queens Park Blackburn Phase 2 Geriatric
    • Whelley Hospital Phase 1

    Non Regional Health Authority

    • Great Ormond Street—Boiler Plant Replacement
    • Moorfields Eye Hospital Redevelopment Phase 2B
    • National Heart and Chest Centre Brompton Phase 1

    Table D

    Hospital schemes costing over £2 million in planning

    Regional Health Authority and Scheme

    Northern

    • North Tyneside Scheme 3 Phase 1
    • Sunderland General Scheme Phase 2

    Yorkshire

    • Bradford St. Lukes Development Phase 1 (Nucleus)

    Trent

    • Derby City Phase 2
    • Kendary Hospital—phase 2

    England and Wales 1981–1985

    Number of accidental deaths of children aged under 15 years from falls from or out of building or other structure (1CD(9) E882) and falls from balcony, by age group.

    Age group

    Year

    Under 1

    1–4

    5–9

    10–14

    Total under 15

    E882 Fall from or out of building or other structure
    19812259
    1982112316
    1983171725

    East Anglian

    • Sudbury—Hospital Services Phase 1

    North West Thames

    • Clayponds Geriatric Unit
    • Ealing Maternity Department

    North East Thames

    • Goodmayes General Hospital

    South West Thames

    • Bognor Community Hospital

    Wessex

    • Salisbury District General Hospital Phase 1
    • St. Margaret's Hospital—Mental Illness Unit

    West Midlands

    • Bromsgrove Community Hospital
    • Burton-On-Trent District General Hospital Phase 2
    • East Birmingham Obstetrics
    • Kidderminster District General Hospital Phase 6
    • Lichfield and Tamworth District General Hospital (Nucleus)
    • Queen Elizabeth Birmingham—Psychiatric Services

    North Western

    • Ormskirk District General Hospital Phase 1

    Drug Abuse

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what evaluation has been made of the impact which anti-drug abuse videos have had on teenagers' attitudes to drugs; and if he will make a statement.

    The Institute for the Study of Drug Dependence holds information in its library about videos which have been evaluated. In January 1986 this Department launched a drug misuse video package for 12 to 15-year-olds. Over 4,700 secondary schools in England and Wales have applied for a free copy. We shall be evaluating our package when schools have had sufficient time to make proper use of it.

    Children's Deaths (Balconies)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many children have (a) been injured and (b) died through falling off balconies during each of the last five years for which records are available; and of what ages they were.

    I regret that information is not available on the numbers of children injured through falling off balconies. The table shows the total number of accidental deaths registered with an underlying cause of death as "fall from or out of building or other structure" in England and Wales in each of the last five years for children aged under 15 years, and also, of those, the number specifically stating -fall from balcony" or similar term.

    Age group

    Year

    Under 1

    1–4

    5–9

    10–14

    Total under 15

    198484119
    1985125320
    E882 (part) Fall from balcony
    1981
    198211
    198322
    198411
    198511

    Computerisation

    Short asked the Secretary of State for Social Services which officials in his Department are to be offered increments in pay of £1,000 for helping to administer new computerisation methods and procedures; what salaries

    Salary ScaleADP allowance paid after Qualifying period of 1 year
    1st year2nd year3rd year
    Executive Officer£5,250-£9,685£700£1,400£1,800
    Higher Executive Officer£9,430-£ 11,941£600£1,200£1,500
    Senior Executive Officer£ll,639-£ 14,629£500£1,000£1,200
    The Department is also considering, as are other Departments, the payment of a discretionary allowance on top of the current ADP allowances; the terms and conditions for making payments have yet to be decided.

    Mental Patients

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people have been detained in a mental hospital or psychiatric unit in each of the last seven years under the provisions of section 36 of the Mental Health Act.

    Section 36 of the Mental Health Act 1983 was implemented on 1 October 1984. Between that date and the end of 1984 there were six admissions to mental illness hospitals and units in England. Figures for 1985 are not yet available.

    Single Payments

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the current average length of time for a decision on an application for a single payment in (a) Greenock and Port Glasgow, (b) Strathclyde, (c) Lothian and (d) Scotland as a whole.

    Claims for single payments are determined as soon as possible after all the information required has been collected; and urgent claims are given priority. Owing to a recent upsurge in claims in Scotland, resulting from a number of "take-up" campaigns mounted by local authorities and other agencies, claims are taking longer than usual to process.Decisions on urgent claims are being given in one to two and two to three weeks, respectively at the Port Glasgow and Greenock local social security offices. Routine claims are taking longer, up to 15 and 8 weeks, respectively. Similar figures for Strathclyde, Lothian and Scotland are not available.

    they currently earn; what consultations he has had with Civil Service unions about these new methods and procedures; and what was the outcome.

    In line with other Departments, this Department pays automatic data processing (ADP) allowances to the following specialist computer staff:

    Children (Malnutrition)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many children have been (a) admitted to hospital and (b) diagnosed as suffering from malnutrition in each of the last five years.

    I will let the right hon. Member have such information as can be obtained without incurring disproportionate cost as soon as possible.

    Food (Nutritional Content)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what studies are currently being undertaken into the nutritional content of the food eaten by pensioners, those on low incomes and those on supplementary benefit.

    A dietary and medical survey of adults aged 16 to 64, beginning in October, will provide data on a randomly selected sample of the United Kingdom population, including those on low incomes and supplementary benefit. In addition, consumption in low income and pensioners' households is included in the continuing survey undertaken by the national food survey committee. Details appear in its annual report.

    Schizophrenia

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will make a statement on his policy towards resources to combat schizophrenia in the light of the launch of "Schizophrenia: A National Emergency".

    A substantial proportion of the £1 billion which is spent annually on mental illness services is spent on the care and treatment of people with schizophrenia. We do not have statistics available centrally that would indicate the precise proportion. We mean to ensure that these funds are used to the best possible advantage. Early this year we set aside £6 million over the next three years to establish mental illness development projects in each National Health Service region, to assist their progress towards improved patterns of care. (This supplements three projects, specifically on aftercare for schizophrenia, which were launched in 1983.)When the development projects were launched we also set aside resources for additional research studies in mental illness; four new studies—all including people with schizophrenia and one including such people only —are already under way. We welcome the progress that has been made in recent years towards understanding this disease and finding the most effective methods of care.We welcome, too, the part which voluntary bodies can play in the mental illness field, in co-operation with the statutory authorities both in raising additional funds and in increasing the knowledge of the public in a non-sensational way, so dispelling unfounded fears.

    Residential Care Homes

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what steps he has taken, in the context of the Government's policy towards deregulation and in the light of the recommendations contained in the White Papers on that subject, Cmnd. 9571 and 9794, to review the regulations covering old people's residential homes; what assessment he has made of the implications of any relaxation in those regulations for the control of abuses; and if he will make a statement.

    I refer my hon. Friend to the reply by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister to the hon. Member for Birmingham, Ladywood (Ms. Short), on 12 June at column 288, and reaffirm that there are no proposals to deregulate residential care homes.I further refer my hon. Friend to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Leicester, East (Mr. Bruinvels), on 3 June at column

    548, on the two-year study which is being carried out by the Social Services Inspectorate. When the inspectorate's further report is available the regulatory arrangements will be reviewed and account will then be taken of the responses to the enterprise and deregulation unit's recent consultation with local authorities and other interested bodies in connection with the review of licensing described in the White Paper "Building Business … Not Barriers".