Written Answers To Questions
Thursday 16 January 1986
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Drugs
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations he has received from the British Veterinary Association, the National Farmers Union, and the Consumers Association, about a black market in the growth-boosting drugs, after the European Economic Community hormone ban; and if he will make a statement.
I am aware of the concern felt in many quarters on this aspect, and we have drawn it to the attention of the Council of Ministers, although no formal representations have recently been made to me.
Crayfish
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) what action his Department has taken under the Import of Live Fish (England and Wales) Act 1980 to prevent the import of American signal crayfish;(2) what action he is taking following the observations in the 11th report of the Nature Conservancy Council on the spread of crayfish plague in British waters; and if he will make a statement.
Unfortunately, the considerable practical difficulties involved in combating a disease which attacks wild fish in their natural environment mean that efforts now to eradicate crayfish plague would almost certainly be unsuccessful. Moreover, the necessary restrictions on all imports of live crayfish, including those for the table, and controls on their movement throughout England and Wales would be highly disruptive to trade and expensive to enforce. For these reasons we have not taken any action to control imports of signal crayfish or to restrict or monitor their movements in this country.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food why his Department has continued to provide support from public funds for an organisation which markets American signal crayfish in view of the health record of imports of such fish.
In 1981 the Government contributed towards the cost of a feasibility study into the co-operative marketing of crayfish matured in this country. The grant was made under the agricultural and horticultural cooperation scheme which was then administered by the Central Council for Agricultural and Horticultural Cooperation (now Food from Britain). As a result, the British Crayfish Marketing Association was established and in 1982 it received a very small grant towards its formation costs. My Department has made no further payments to the BCMA.
River Mersey (Silt Dumping)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on the current position regarding the issuing of a dumping licence for silt dredged from the River Mersey, its adjacent docks, locks and channels.
The licences issued under the Dumping at Sea Act 1974 for the disposal to sea of dredge spoil from the River Mersey and its environs expired on 31 December 1985. Applications for their renewal were not received until well into the month of December. As it usually takes about two months for applications to be fully considered by our scientific advisers, the old licences were extended until 28 February to allow time for proper assessments to be made.Under the Food and Environment Protection Act 1985, which now governs the issue of licences for sea disposal, Ministers are required to have regard to the protection of the marine environment, the living resources which it supports and human health. We shall take full account of these considerations and all other relevant factors in coming to decisions on these applications, which we expect to reach well before the end of February.
Nets
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he plans to seek further controls over the use of nylon monofilament nets in England and Wales.
[pursuant to his reply, 15 January 1986, c. 579]: No. I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given to my hon. Friend the Member for Eastleigh (Sir D. Price) on 29 November 1985, at column 702.
Attorney-General
Official Secrets Act
asked the Attorney-General whether he will refer the apparent breach of any security involved in the disclosure of the contents of the recent letter of the Solicitor-General to the right hon. Member for Henley (Mr. Heseltine) to the Director of Public Prosecutions for his consideration and advice as to whether a decision to prosecute under section 2 of the Official Secrets Act should be taken.
An internal inquiry has been instituted into the matter to which the right hon. and learned Gentleman refers. When it has been completed —and it is still some considerable way from being completed—I shall be in a position to consider whether it is appropriate to follow the procedure which he suggests.
Scotland
Summerston Shopping Centre, Glasgow
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland when the Scottish Development Agency hopes to complete its arrangements with Glasgow district council for landscaping the coup at the Summerston shopping centre, Glasgow.
The agency is re-appraising all proposed new projects and expects to reach decisions by March on the priority to be accorded to this project, and, if it is to go ahead, on the time scale for undertaking it.
Ruchill Hospital, Glasgow
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what further consideration his Department has given to proposals from Greater Glasgow health board for providing a psychiatric day unit at Ruchill hospital, Glasgow and an inpatient unit to serve the north-west of the city.
Formal proposals for a psychiatric development at Ruchill are still awaited from the health board. I understand, however, that the board is now actively working on these proposals, which will require to be set in the context of an overall strategy for the development of psychiatric services in the area.
Lothian Regional Council (Rsg)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the total value of rate support grant paid to Lothian regional council in 1979 and 1985, respectively; and what percentage of the expenditure of the council those figures represented.
Total rate support grant paid to Lothian regional council in respect of 1979–80 was £134·1 million. The grant paid in respect of 1985–86 will not be known until final expenditure information is available. The grant payable for 1985–86 on the basis of the Rate Support Grant (Scotland) Order 1985 is £182 million. This has already been adjusted for grant penalties and interest rate changes and will be further adjusted for these reasons as necessary. These grant figures are 52·6 per cent. of total expenditure, including loan charges, in 1979–80 and 45·6 per cent. in 1985–86.
Wales
Parrot Corporation
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will report the outcome of Mr. Douglas Baker's internal investigation into the Welsh Development Agency's handling of its investment in the Parrot Corporation.
I announced on 28 October, at columns 313–14, that I had invited Mr. Douglas Baker, chairman of Touche Ross and Co., to examine the Welsh Development agency's handling of its investment in the Parrot Corporation and the agency's supervision of its investment, having special regard to the provisions of the WDA Act 1975, the investment guidelines laid down by the Welsh Office and the WDA's own investment manual; and to report to me.Mr. Baker has now completed his investigation. I have expressed my gratitude to him for the thoroughness with which he has undertaken this task.As I earlier informed the House, Mr. Baker was asked to undertake an internal investigation. His report contains material that is of a commercially confidential nature. In view of this and the continuing police investigation into the cirumstances of the original investment and the conduct of individuals it would not be appropriate to publish his internal advice to me. I undertook to report further to the House.Mr. Baker found that the transaction between the Parrot Corporation and Northern Trust involving a collateralised deposit was most unusual from a commercial viewpoint and that it could not reasonably have been anticipated by the agency. I have no reason to dispute that finding. Mr. Baker also found that the WDA Act 1975 and the investment guidelines had been followed. However, although Mr. Baker also concluded that even the most elaborate procedures may not have been sufficient to prevent the circumstances that arose, he did find that certain of the procedures followed by the WDA in its handling of the investment and in its subsequent monitoring were deficient.I have discussed these findings with the chairman of the WDA. It is clear that for the future there must be arrangements to ensure that the deficiencies identified are not repeated. The chairman has informed me that a number of measures have already been taken by the agency: in particular, arrangements with respect to the appointment of non-executive directors and their responsibilities have been substantially clarified and a new system to improve the monitoring of investments has been established within the agency. In the light of Mr. Baker's findings, the chairman has also informed me that steps will be taken to ensure that the agency obtains reports from outside accountants in all appropriate investment cases and to allow closer supervision of the legal aspects of completion deals. By these means the agency has taken or is in the process of taking steps to ensure that the deficiencies identified by Mr. Baker have been dealt with.
Cervical Screening
asked the Secretary of State for Wales (1) what expenditure will be incurred during the current year and for 1986–87, by each health authority in Wales, on the cervical smear programme;(2) what was the total expenditure incurred by the National Health Service on its cervical smear programme, by health authority, in Wales, for each of the last five years.
The information is not available centrally.
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will make a statement on the extent to which the current level of funding of the cervical smear programme in each of the area health authorities in Wales for the current year admits of the completion of the service, tests and follow-up reporting to all patients requesting or referred by their general practitioners for such tests.
The level of funding for this service is essentially a matter for the individual health authorities to determine in the light of other demands on their resources.
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what proportion of the total expenditure incurred on the cervical smear programme in Mid Glamorgan is accounted for by the laboratory testing of smears; and which centres are used for tests conducted for each of the districts within the Mid Glamorgan area health authority.
Information in respect of expenditure on the cervical smear programme is not available centrally. Pathology laboratories at the following hospitals in Mid Glamorgan conducted cervical cytology tests during 1984: Prince Charles, East Glamorgan general and Bridgend general.
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what arrangements exist in each of the Welsh health authorities for follow-up reporting of results to National Health Service patients who have received cervical smear tests.
Responsibility for the administration of this service lies with the health authorities. The report of the joint NHS-Welsh Office working party which was published last July recommended certain follow-up action and safeguards that should be
| Health district/Management Unit | Number of Tests | ||||
| 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | |
| Mid Glamorgan | |||||
| Ogwr | 7,002 | 6,688 | 6,274 | 6,974 | 8,317 |
| Taff-Ely | 8,606 | 9,678 | 9,277 | 10,948 | 11,298 |
| Rhondda | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
| Merthyr Cynon | 6,817 | 7,631 | 6,830 | 7,751 | 10,836 |
| Rhymney Valley | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
| Total | 22,425 | 23,997 | 22,381 | 25,673 | 30,451 |
| Clwyd | 19,390 | 20,435 | 19,144 | 20,821 | 22,304 |
| East Dyfed | 17,650 | 18,920 | 17,974 | 19,372 | 16,319 |
| Pembrokeshire∗ | .. | .. | Nil | Nil | Nil |
| Gwent | 22,506 | 23,569 | 23,241 | 25,112 | 27,828 |
| Gwynedd | 8,763 | 9,825 | 9,684 | 10,451 | 12,791 |
| Powys | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
| South Glamorgan | 28,877 | 32,036 | 30,724 | 31,920 | 38,632 |
| West Glamorgan | 19,495 | 20,536 | 18,882 | 21,026 | 23,055 |
| Wales | 139,106 | 149,318 | 142,030 | 154,375 | 171,380 |
Local Authority Finance
asked the Secretary of State for Wales what is the additional capital allocation proposed for local authorities in Wales for 1986–87 compared with 1985–86; and what is his estimate of (a) the additional annual loans charges and (b) the other revenue cost consequences arising which will arise from this increased capital allocation.
The total of capital allocations available to local authorities in Wales for 1986–87 is £322·8 million, compared with £263·3 million in 1985–86; an increase of some £60 million, or 23 per cent. Additional capital expenditure may increase revenue expenditure in two ways—loan charges to repay any borrowing, and current expenditure, arising from increases in associated manpower and running expenses. Provision for this expenditure increased by £25·7 million and £59·1 million respectively between 1985–6 and 1986–87. The precise effect on current expenditure will depend on the nature of the schemes undertaken. Indeed, in announcing allocations for individual authorities on 16 December I emphasised that authorities should give priority to revenue saving schemes, such as projects to eliminate surplus school places. In the case of housing, a substantial part of the additional resources have been incorporated into local procedures. Some authorities have commented on the working party's findings and these are being considered prior to the issue of a circular advising authorities on the implementation of the recommendations.
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will state for each of the last five years the number of cervical smear tests conducted in each district of the Mid Glamorgan health authority and the total number for each of the other Welsh area health authorities.
The number of cervical cytology tests reported by pathology laboratories for each of the years 1980 to 1984 are given in the table. It is not possible to relate these figures to the district of residence of the patients tested. earmarked for public and private sector renovation, which does not, of course, result in increased current expenditure.
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will specify the mechanism by which grant moneys which are withheld from local authorities in Wales will be credited back to local authorities in due course, and not redirected for use by other public services in Wales.
If aggregate expenditure by local authorities in Wales exceeds the level of provision in the rate support grant for 1986–87, there will be a net under-claim on block grant. As I indicated in my statement to the House on 18 December, any such surplus grant will be made available for local government spending in Wales. I shall await the budget returns of authorities before determining how this surplus might be distributed.
Rate Support Grant
asked the Secretary of State for Wales when he proposes to issue the final settlement figures for the rate support grant for local authorities in Wales for the year 1984–85; and why there has been a delay in this matter.
There has been no delay. In accordance with the timetable agreed with the Welsh local authority associations, I expect to lay the final supplementary report for 1984–85 in July of this year, after the customary audit of local authorities' accounts has been completed.
Departmental Cash Limits
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he proposes to change any of his Department's cash limits for the current year, in respect of rate support grants, national parks supplementary grants, and transport supplementary grants.
Yes. Subject to parliamentary approval of the necessary Supplementary Estimates, the following amendments are proposed. The cash limit for national parks supplementary grants (class 18, vote 4) will be increased by £29,000, from £2,000,000 to £2,029,000. The cash limit for transport supplementary grants (class 18, vote 10) will be increased by £9,000, from £26,500,000 to £26,509,000. These increases will be matched by a corresponding reduction of £38,000 to the cash limit for RSG (class 18, vote 2), from £828,600,000 to £828,562,000.
Home Department
Police Cells (Detained Persons)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he last visited remand prisoners in police cells; where; and if he will make a statement.
My noble Friend Lord Glenarthur visited the cells at Horseferry road magistrates court on 30 July 1985.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department which police forces outside of the metropolitan area have detained prisoners in police cells in 1985; where they were detained; and what were their age and sex.
| Adult males | Adult females | Males under 21 | |||||
| Metropolitan police | Other Forces | Metropolitan police | Other Forces | Metropolitan police | Other Forces | Total | |
| October | |||||||
| 18–21 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | 36 |
| 21–22 | 6 | — | 5 | — | — | 11 | 22 |
| 22–23 | 20 | — | — | — | — | 9 | 29 |
| 23–24 | 5 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 10 |
| 24–25 | — | — | 11 | — | 2 | — | 13 |
| 25–28 | — | — | 12 | 3 | — | — | 15 |
| 28–29 | 3 | — | 11 | 2 | — | — | 16 |
| 29–30 | — | — | 6 | — | — | — | 6 |
| 30–31 | 12 | — | 15 | 1 | — | — | 28 |
| 31–1 | 5 | — | 13 | — | — | 7 | 25 |
| November | |||||||
| 3–4 | 12 | 3 | — | 3 | — | 9 | 27 |
| 4–5 | 3 | — | 6 | — | — | 5 | 14 |
| 5–6 | 6 | — | 9 | 2 | 2 | — | 19 |
| 6–7 | 7 | — | 13 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 28 |
| 7–8 | — | — | 21 | — | 1 | 2 | 24 |
| 8–11 | 24 | — | 18 | 3 | — | — | 45 |
| 11–12 | 2 | — | 14 | 1 | — | 2 | 19 |
| 12–13 | 3 | — | 20 | — | — | 7 | 30 |
| 13–14 | 1 | — | 20 | 1 | 2 | — | 24 |
| 14–15 | — | — | 24 | 1 | 3 | — | 28 |
| 15–18 | 27 | — | 36 | — | — | — | 63 |
| 18–19 | 19 | — | 15 | 1 | — | — | 35 |
| 19–20 | 24 | — | 16 | 4 | — | — | 44 |
The number of prisoners held in police cells by provincial police forces between 18 October 1985 (that is since my reply to a similar question by the hon. Member on 28 October) and 31 December 1985 was as follows:
| counties | Adult | Under 21 | Adult | Under 21 |
| Males | Males | Females | Females | |
| Bedfordshire | — | — | 2 | — |
| Cambridgeshire | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dorset | — | — | 6 | — |
| Essex | 35 | — | 2 | 3 |
| Hampshire | — | — | 11 | 4 |
| Hertfordshire | 29 | — | — | — |
| Kent | — | — | 3 | 1 |
| Leicestershire | — | — | — | — |
| Norfolk | — | — | — | — |
| Northampton | — | — | — | 1 |
| Suffolk | — | — | 8 | — |
| Surrey | 11 | — | — | — |
| Sussex | 54 | — | — | 1 |
| Thames Valley | — | — | 7 | — |
| Wiltshire | — | — | 1 | — |
| Total | 129 | — | 42 | 10 |
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the longest period of time that a person was detained in police cells in 1985.
Twenty-nine nights.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the number of (a) men, (b) women and (c) juveniles in custody in police cells on each day in 1985 by location.
The number of prisoners held in police cells in 1985 after 18 October, the last occasion on which I answered this question for the hon. Member, was as follows:
| Adult males | Adult females | Males under 21 | |||||
| Metropolitan Police | Other Forces | Metropolitan Police | Other Forces | Metropolitan Police | Other Forces | Total | |
| 20–21 | 8 | — | 24 | 1 | — | 1 | 34 |
| 21–22 | 13 | — | 22 | — | — | — | 35 |
| 22–25 | 36 | — | 45 | 6 | — | — | 87 |
| 25–26 | 40 | — | 19 | 6 | — | 2 | 67 |
| 26–27 | 41 | — | 26 | 1 | — | 1 | 69 |
| 27–28 | 16 | 5 | 31 | 1 | 3 | — | 56 |
| 28–29 | — | — | 36 | 2 | 3 | — | 41 |
| 29–2 | 45 | — | 48 | — | — | — | 93 |
| December | |||||||
| 2–3 | 44 | 3 | 20 | 3 | — | 3 | 73 |
| 3–4 | 77 | 16 | 24 | 2 | 4 | — | 123 |
| 4–5 | 87 | 21 | 19 | — | 6 | 3 | 136 |
| 5–6 | 57 | 26 | 10 | — | — | 3 | 96 |
| 6–9 | 111 | 9 | — | 3 | — | 3 | 126 |
| 9–10 | 37 | — | 6 | 1 | — | 11 | 55 |
| 10–11 | 37 | — | 7 | — | — | — | 7 |
| 11–12 | 2 | — | 9 | — | — | — | 11 |
| 12–13 | 16 | — | 15 | — | — | — | 31 |
| 16–17 | 16 | — | 1 | — | — | 3 | 20 |
| 17–18 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | 9 |
| 18–19 | 5 | — | 4 | — | — | — | 9 |
| 19–20 | 8 | — | 6 | — | — | 1 | 15 |
| 20–23 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 |
| 23–24 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | 7 |
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the number of (a) men, (b) women and (c) juveniles in custody in police cells on each day in 1986 by location.
| Adult Females | Adult Males | Males Under 21 | ||||||
| Metropolitan Police | Other Forces | Metropolitan Police | Other Forces | Metropolitan Police | Other Forces | Total | ||
| January | ||||||||
| 1–2 | 15 | 15 | — | — | — | — | 15 | |
| 2–3 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | |
| 7–8 | 3 | — | — | — | 1 | — | 4 | |
| 10–13 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | |
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is the latest cost of holding a person in police cells.
The average cost per night of holding a prisoner in police cells based on the latest accounts submitted by the Metropolitan police, is £176.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the number of police officers deployed in 1985 in guarding persons detained in police cells.
This information is not recorded centrally.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the total expenditure on prisoners in police cells in the last financial year.
Total expenditure incurred by the Department in the financial year 1984–85 on holding prisoners in police cells was £3,358,560.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on conditions in which unconvicted and unsentenced persons are held in police and court cells.
As at 13 January 1986, prisoners have been held in police cells as follows:
We are conscious of the fact that court cells are not designed to hold prisoners for more than a few hours and that the medical and other facilities leave much to be desired. The police, however, are doing everything they can under difficult circumstances to provide the best possible facilities.
Racially Motivated Attacks
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if he will call for a report from each chief of police listing the number of racially motivated attacks that have been recorded in each of the last five years; and what special measures they have taken to deal with this problem;(2) if he has knowledge of any police force that does not record racially motivated attacks;(3) what advice or guidelines have been issued to police forces in the recording of and the dealing with racially motivated attacks.
Information on the incidence of racially motivated attacks and on the recording practices of individual police forces is not held centrally. However, in October last year the Association of Chief Police Officers issued guidance on the handling of racial attacks. The guidance, a copy of which I am placing in the Library, emphasised the importance of a vigorous and sympathetic police response, and drew attention to the need for collecting and collating reliable local information about racial incidents. My right hon. Friend has asked the Chief Inspector of Constabulary to pay particular attention in his annual inspections to the steps taken in each force to record and monitor racially motivated incidents.
Prison Officers (Training Courses)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many regionally organised training courses for prison officers have been suspended as a result of the prison department's decisions communicated to prison governors in August 1985.
Two hundred and eleven courses, of varying content and duration, have been cancelled.
Holloway Prison
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will list for each prisoner at Holloway prison the number of (a) baths or showers allowed per week and (b) changes of clothes allowed per week.
The number of baths or showers allowed at Holloway is generally in excess of the statutory requirement of one per week. On average, each inmate is allowed four per week: inmates assigned to certain work parties are allowed a daily bath. All inmates may change their clothes for clean ones each day.
Immigration
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is the waiting list as at 1 January for entry clearance at (a) Dacca, (b) Islamabad and (c) Delhi; and what were the comparative figures for 1 January 1985 and 1 January 1984.
Information for end-December 1985 is not yet available; the other information requested and that for end-September 1985 are given in the following table:
| 20 December 1985 to 3 January 1986 | 20 December 1984 to 3 January 1985 | |||
| Passengers arrived | Refused entry | Passengers arrived | Refused entry | |
| Heathrow | ||||
| Terminal 1 | 107,000 | 74 | 101,000 | 69 |
| Terminal 2 | 117,000 | 204 | 109,000 | 150 |
| Terminal 3 | 182,000 | 401 | 174,000 | 322 |
| Gatwick | 197,000 | 177 | 187,000 | 111 |
| Dover (Eastern docks, Western docks and Hoverport) | 145,000 | 160 | 143,000 | 119 |
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many arrivals from Bangladesh were stopped at (a) Heathrow, (b) Gatwick and (c) Dover between 20 December 1985 and 3 January 1986.
| Persons awaiting a decision on their application for entry clearance to the United Kingdom* | |||
| Number | |||
| end December 1983 | end December 1984 | end September 1985 | |
| Dacca | 11,400 | 13,300 | 12,800 |
| Islamabad | 6,400 | 7,000 | 7,000 |
| New Delhi | 2,000 | 1,700 | 1,600 |
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he intends to introduce visa requests for arrivals from Bangladesh.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to a question from my hon. Friend the Member for Brigg and Cleethorpes (Mr. Brown) on 5 December, at column 311.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the visa requests for arrivals from Sri Lanka will be lifted.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to a question from him on 17 December, at column 132.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many arrivals from (a) Bangladesh, (b) Pakistan, (c) India and (d) Sri Lanka were held in detention at (i) Harmondsworth and (ii) Ashford during the period 20 December 1985 to 3 January 1986.
The available information relates to passengers detained at Harmondsworth who were citizens of the countries concerned, and is as follows: (a) 49; (b) 83: (c) 64; (d) 12. Statistics of persons held in Ashford remand centre do not differentiate between passengers and others held under the powers contained in the Immigration Act 1971.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many persons were denied entry to the United Kingdom at (a) Heathrow, (b) Gatwick and (c) Dover between 20 December 1985 and 3 January 1986; what was the total number of passengers arriving; and what were the comparative figures for 1984–85.
Precise statistics for passengers arriving during the period in question are not yet available. Those given are approximate.
I assume the hon. Member is referring to the number of Bangladesh citizens who were refused entry at the ports listed during this period.The information is as follows:
| Number | |
| Heathrow | |
| Terminal 1 | 0 |
| Terminal 2 | 1 |
| Terminal 3 | 60 |
| Gatwick | 5 |
| Dover (Eastern docks, Western docks and Hoverport) | 13 |
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent instructions have been given to the immigration service dealing with the arrival of people from Bangladesh.
Those issued at Heathrow terminal 3 about liaison with the Bangladesh high commission, about falsified documents and about the need for faster handling of representations from right hon. and hon. Members.
Vegan Diets
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he is satisfied with the adequacy of the vegan diets being received by inmates of East Sutton Park open prison.
Sentenced prisoners may be allowed a vegan diet at the governor's discretion. On 14 January 1986 a vegan diet was being taken by two prisoners at East Sutton Park and a vegetarian diet by a further four prisoners, all at their own request. I understand that none of the prisoners concerned has complained about her food and that on the basis of his regular inspections the medical officer is satisfied with the nutritional quality of the diets.
Community Radio
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will publish in the Official Report the membership of his advisory committee on community radio.
The members of the advisory panel on community radio are:
Mr. Stephen O'Brien (Chairman), Mr. Ray Beaty, Mrs. Diana Eccles, Mr. Bevan Jones, Mrs. Jill McIvor and Mr. Richard Wade.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what consultations have been held between representatives of minority community groups and the advisory committee on community radio.
I understand that the advisory panel on community radio has held a number of useful meetings with interested individuals and groups from the ethnic minority communities.
Hong Kong
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement regarding the rights of Hong Kong British Dependent Territories citizens in the light of the motion passed by the Legislative Council of Hong Kong at its session on Wednesday 8 January.
The Government's proposals for the future nationality status of Hong Kong British Dependent Territories citizens and related matters were set out in a White Paper (Cmnd. 9637) published on 17 October 1985. I am aware of the motion passed by the Legislative Council of Hong Kong on 8 January. The House will have an opportunity to consider all these matters when it debates the White Paper later today. The Government will take careful account of the views expressed.
Housing (Fire Safety)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he plans to issue a national code of guidance on means of escape in case of fire from houses in multiple occupation; what representations he has received from local authorities and others on the subject; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend plans shortly to issue a draft code of guidance on fire safety in certain houses in multiple occupation for consultation. Most representations have inquired about progress on the preparation of the code, which has taken longer than was expected.
Bbc
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what estimate he has as to the amount of money which might be expected to be raised by allowing advertising on BBC television.
A number of recent published studies, including two commissioned by the committee on financing the BBC, have offered various estimates of the potential revenue which might be derived from introducing advertising on BBC television. My right hon. Friend, of course, awaits the committee's own assessment of this evidence and of the financial and other implications of financing the BBC partly or wholly out of advertising revenue or from other sources.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what steps he intends to take to protect the editorial independence of the BBC; and if he will make a statement.
I am not aware that any steps are necessary.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what discussions the Minister has had with the governors of the BBC and the IBA over the introduction of advertising on BBC.
My right hon. Friend's discussion with the chairman of the BBC's board of governors arid of the IBA about various broadcasting issues have not included any substantive consideration of the questions now being studied by the committee on financing the BBC, whose report it is well understood he awaits with an open mind.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if the BBC will continue to be allowed to retain any revenues derived from any source other than the licence fee.
The BBC's charter provides for the corporation to receive and use revenue derived from sources other than the television licence fee, and includes no provision for such revenue to be surrendered.
Peacock Committee (Report)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the Peacock committee is expected to report.
I understand that the committee expects to submit its report in the summer.
Mr Louis Farrakhan
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will use his powers to deny entry to the United Kingdom to Mr. Louis Farrakhan, an American citizen, on the ground that his presence would not be in the public interest or of good race and community relations.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether, in view of his anti-Semitic comments, he will refuse permission for Mr. Louis Farrakhan to enter the United Kingdom on the ground that his presence would not be conducive to the public good; and if he will make a statement.
I have decided, in the light of Mr. Farrakhan's public statements, that his presence in the United Kingdom would not be conducive to the public good, and have given instructions that he should be refused leave to enter if he seeks admission to the United Kingdom.
Local Government
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement as to his policy towards funding posts within Lancashire under section 11 of the Local Government Act 1966.
All applications from local authorities for grant under section 11 of the Local Government Act 1966 are considered in accordance with the criteria set out in Home Office circular No. 97/1982, a copy of which is in the Library.
Prime Minister
Engagements
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 16 January.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 16 January.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 16 January.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 16 January.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 16 January.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 16 January.
This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in this House I shall be having further meetings later today. This evening I shall be giving a dinner for His Majesty King Hussein of Jordan.
Select Committees
asked the Prime Minister how many staff are engaged principally in liaison with departmental Select Committees in each Department, and if he will estimate the number of working days spent by each Department on the overall requirements of departmental Select Committees.
Liaison with departmental Select Committees forms part of the duties of some staff in all Departments. In 1985 six individuals are reported by Departments to have spent more than half their time solely on this work. A study was carried out in 1980–81 to determine the amount of time spent by all officials on departmental Select Committee work, and a copy of the report on this was placed in the Library on 10 December 1982. It would not be possible to update this information without an extensive new study at disproportionate cost; however, in general the work occasioned by departmental Select Committees in 1985 has not changed markedly from the year on which this study was based.
Mr Mohammed Fayed
asked the Prime Minister why Mohammed Fayed was invited to a Downing street dinner to mark the state visit of President Mubarak of Egypt; and if she will make a statement.
It is the normal practice to invite prominent nationals of the country represented by a foreign visitor to such occasions.
asked the Prime Minister if Mr. Mohammed Fayed attended a function at Downing street in March or April 1985.
asked the Prime Minister if she has ever met Mr. Mohammed Fayed in an official capacity.
I met Mr. Al-Fayed in the context of the visit of the Sultan of Brunei on 25 January 1985, and subsequently at a dinner for President Mubarak of Egypt at Downing Street on 14 March 1985.
Brunei (Sterling Deposits)
asked the Prime Minister if any members or representatives of the British Government had any meetings with members or representatives of the Government of Brunei in relation to sterling deposists; and if she will make a statement.
The contents of meetings between members or representatives of Her Majesty's Government and other Governments are confidential.
Gifts
asked the Prime Minister what gifts the Prime Minister has received from representatives of foreign Governments and overseas Heads of State; and on what dates.
I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply I gave yesterday to the hon. Member for Bolsover (Mr. Skinner).
Sultan Of Brunei
asked the Prime Minister on what occasions since 1979 she met the Sultan of Brunei.
I met the Sultan of Brunei in June 1981 when he was in London studying the structure and operation of British government as part of the preparations for Brunei's independence. I also met the Sultan on three occasions last year: in January, when he was on a visit to London; in April, during the course of my tour of south and south-east Asia; and in October at the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting.
Nuclear Tests (Report)
asked the Prime Minister if she has completed consideration of the Australian Royal Commission's report on British nuclear tests; if she has any plans to meet Senator Gareth Evans; and if she will make a statement.
No. Officials had preliminary discussions in Canberra last week, which provided a useful opportunity for an initial exchange of views and for clarification of a number of matters. Senator Gareth Evans, Australian Minister for Resources and Energy, is to have discussions with my right hon. and learned Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, my hon. Friend the Minister of State for Defence Procurement and Baroness Young, Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, whilst he is in Britain next week.
Energy Conservation
asked the Prime Minister if she will take steps to harmonise the provisions of financial inducements for household energy conservation throughout the United Kingdom on the basis of the scheme operating in Northern Ireland; and if she will make a statement.
The Government already provide financial assistance towards household energy efficiency in the rest of the United Kingdom on the same basis as in Northern Ireland.
Westland Plc
asked the Prime Minister if the recent letter from the Solicitor-General to the Secretary of State for Defence about Westland was covered by the Official Secrets Act.
Yes.
Information Leaks (Inquiries)
asked the Prime Minister how many inquiries into leaks have been initiated since June 1979; on what dates; and with what outcome.
As I have made clear on a number of previous occasions, it has not been the practice of successive Governments to disclose information of this kind.
Transport
Channel Fixed Link
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what individuals and bodies, including fire authorities, have been consulted about the risk from fire and other emergencies in each of the proposed solutions to the cross-Channel link.
During the course of the Government's assessment of the promoters' proposals, views on the risk from fire and other emergencies were obtained from the Chief Inspecting Officer for Railways, the Home Office fire service inspectorate, the chief fire officer for Kent, the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority's safety and reliability directorate and Lloyd's Register.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list the dates when he received the final complete proposals from each of the promoters for the proposed cross-Channel link.
Four proposals for fixed link schemes were submitted in accordance with the "Invitation to Promoters" on 31 October 1985. In response to the joint Anglo-French assessment all promoters proposed, or agreed to, adaptations of their schemes to meet the various concerns of the two Governments. No time limit was imposed on such adaptations.
Airport Security
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what recent discussions he has had on security of United Kingdom airports; and if he will make a statement.
On 16 July in reply to a question from my hon. Friend the Member for Beaconsfield (Mr. Smith) my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State outlined some of the steps that were being taken to enhance the already high standard of security at British airports. Most of the measures to which he referred are now in place (for example, the reconciliation of passengers and baggage is now a legal requirement). We are keeping all aviation security measures continually under review; I am currently involved in discussions on security arrangements at United Kingdom airports following the attacks on EL AL check-in desks at Vienna and Rome.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will undertake an immediate review of recent security lapses at Manchester airport; and if he will make a statement.
Manchester airport has been asked to report to my Department details of recent lapses in security and the remedial action they are taking. My Department will then consider whether any further action is necessary.
Avon Bridge (Tolls)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will consider the introduction of toll charges on the M5 over the Avon bridge.
No. I have no power to introduce such tolls. Moreover, I have no wish to risk causing significant volumes of traffic to divert from the M5 to unsuitable local roads in and around Bristol.
Cars
asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many private cars were registered in Wales in 1979 and in the latest year for which figures are available.
The total number of private cars registered in Wales in December 1979 was 726,398. The total as at 30 September 1985 (the last date for which figures are available) was 810,243.
Navigation Lights
asked the Secretary of State for Transport (1) if he is satisfied that the navigational beacon at Minsters rock on the Rubha Na Leachaig on the west coast of Scotland is suitable for all weather conditions; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he is satisfied with the efficiency of the navigational lights into Loch Inchard and Kinlochbervie on the west coast of Scotland; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to the reply, 15 January 1986, c. 580]: These lights are provided by the Highland regional council in its capacity as a local lighthouse authority. The Northern lighthouse board has a statutory duty to inspect these lights and I understand that it found them to be satisfactory in all respects when examined in August last. This is a matter for the board's judgment.
Ml (Signpost Damage)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to his answer of 14 November, Official Report, column 263, why the direction signpost at junction 30 of the southbound section of the M1 between Wakefield and London has still not been repaired.
My reply of 14 November referred to the direction sign at the southbound exit to junction 30 which had been reported damaged on 9 October and was repaired on 28 October. I understand, however, that the right hon. Gentleman may have been referring to the one-mile advance warning sign at this junction which has also been damaged. It will be repaired as part of a larger re-signing scheme which I expect to be completed by the end of March 1986. The damage to this sign involves no threat to road safety and I have no information as to when it was damaged.
Motorways (Signs)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what sources of information he uses in replying to parliamentary questions on the state of road signs on motorways; and what checks his Department carries out to confirm the information provided.
Details are obtained from the county councils which maintain the motorways as my agents. My Department's regional offices also periodically carry out their own inspections of motorways.
Trade And Industry
Manufacturing Production
49.
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what are the latest available statistics of manufacturing production.
The index of output for manufacturing in the three months up to October 1985 stood at 103, based on 1980 equal to 100.
Airbus
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much launch aid is planned for British Aerospace in connection with development of the European airbus project; and if he will make a statement.
In accordance with the statement to the House on 1 March 1984 by my right hon. Friend, the former Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, financial provision has been made in the Department's Vote for launch aid of up to £250 million in respect of participation by British Aerospace in the Airbus A320 programme.
Aerospace Industry
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1) what information he has concerning the share of the total world market which has been held by the United Kingdom aerospace industry in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available;(2) what information he has concerning the share of the total European aerospace market which has been held by the United Kingdom aerospace industry in each of the last five years for which figures are available.
I shall reply to my hon. Friend as soon as possible.
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what information he has concerning the percentage of turnover which is represented by exports from the United Kingdom aerospace industry.
The most recent information that I have is for 1983 when 56 per cent. of the value of the United Kingdom aerospace industry's turnover was exported.
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what information he has concerning the total value of aerospace exports from the United Kingdom in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available; and what was the percentage change in value on the previous year's figures in each of those years.
According to the information I have, the figures in current money terms are as follows:
| UK aerospace exports £million | Per cent. growth over previous years | |
| 1975 | 801 | 21·2 |
| 1976 | 903 | 11·3 |
| 1977 | 1,038 | 13·0 |
| 1978 | 1,170 | 11·3 |
| 1979 | 1,269 | 7·8 |
| 1980 | 1,775 | 28·5 |
| 1981 | 2,547 | 30·3 |
| 1982 | 3,110 | 18·1 |
| 1983 | 3,194 | 2·6 |
| 1984 | 3,514 | 9·1 |
London Commodity Exchange (Exhibition)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will arrange for an exhibition relating to the London commodity exchange to be displayed in the Upper Waiting Hall.
Arrangements have been made for such an exhibition in the Upper Waiting Hall to take place from 24 February to 28 February 1986.
Materials And Processes
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what is his Department's policy on the wider application of new and improved materials and processes in the light of his Department's review of its support for innovation scheme and the publication of the materials advisory group report.
The materials advisory group drew attention to the very important field of materials technology and identified within it areas of particular opportunity to a wide range of UK industries. This has made a major contribution to my Department's continuing assessment of research priorities. While I am unable to accept that progress in this field can only be made by the provision of additional Government funding on the scale suggested by the group, I consider that there is considerable scope for obtaining greater benefit from the already substantial amount of work in the materials field by the redirection and more efficient use of Government resources.The Department will therefore be: re-orientating its existing resources towards materials work; seeking to improve awareness of new materials and to develop collaborative projects which will accelerate commercial application; collaborating more closely with the science and engineering research council to guide university research and promote technology transfer; working with the Ministry of Defence with a view to commercial exploitation of military materials developments; seeking the fullest UK participation in European Community and other international collaborative programmes; and working for improved specification standards where these offer opportunities for exploitation of new materials.In the discussion which has been concluded in the European Community's research council on an extension of the Community's primary raw materials programme I particularly emphasised the importance which the UK attaches to the new section on advanced materials. In the four year research action programme on materials which we agreed, over 40 per cent. of the total budget of £40 million will be devoted to this section, thus providing a useful further stimulus to advanced materials work.
Imperial Tobacco Ltd
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will refer the takeover bid by Hanson Trust for Imperial Tobacco Ltd. to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission; and if he will make a statement.
The proposed takeover is currently being considered by the Director General of Fair Trading. My right hon. and learned Friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry will make his decision on whether it should be referred for further investigation by the Monopolies and Mergers Commission in the light of that advice.
Airbus Projects (Launch Aid)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much launch aid Her Majesty's Government proposes to make available to British Aerospace in connection with the development of (a) the TA9 airbus project and (b) the TA11 airbus project; and if he will make a statement.
The supervisory board of Airbus Industries has yet to make any decision on the launch of these projects. The question put by my hon. Friend is thus premature.
House Of Fraser
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry why the application by Lonhro to bid for the House of Fraser was delayed by the Secretary of State for three months in November 1984.
The extension of the period for the Monopolies and Mergers Commission to report on the merger reference of Lonrho and House of Fraser by three months, to 28 February 1985, was granted in the normal way, in response to a request for an extension from the MMC.
Energy
British Gas
50.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what sum he now expects will be received from the sale of British Gas in 1986–87 and 1987–88; and what is his estimate of the total fees and charges which will be received by City institutions involved in the sale.
I cannot speculate on the value the market will place on British Gas. Total fees and charges will depend on the precise structure of the offer, on which decisions have not yet been taken.
Renewable Energy Sources (Research And Development)
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what has been the annual expenditure on research and development in renewable sources of energy since 1979–80, including the current year and any projected expenditure.
Information about expenditure between 1975–76 and 1984–85 was given in reply to the question from the hon. Member for Bootle (Mr. Roberts) on 13 June 1985 at columns 533–34. Actual expenditure in 1984–85 was the same as the estimate provided in that answer. Expenditure on research and development on renewable energy in 1985–86 is forecast to be at a similar level.
Petrol (Lead Content)
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what additional capital investment has been incurred by the United Kingdom oil industry as a result of the reduction in the maximum lead content of petrol from 0·4 to 0·15g per litre from January.
The United Kingdom oil industry's most recently published figure indicates capital expenditure of the order of £300 million.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will estimate the extra energy, in terms of barrels of crude oil, that will be consumed at the refinery each year as a result of the reduction in the maximum lead content of petrol from 0·4 to 0·15g per litre from 1 January and, subsequently from 0·15g per litre to unleaded, when the transition to unleaded petrol is complete.
For a petrol demand of 20·2 million tonnes, the additional crude oil required per year, when lead levels are reduced, is estimated to be:
From 0·40 to 0·15g per litre (g/1) of lead—some 3·7 million barrels.
From 0·15g/1 of lead to unleaded—some 4·9 million barrels.
asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will estimate the increase in price that the United Kingdom oil industry will need to charge for each gallon of petrol as a result of the reduction in the maximum lead content of petrol from 0·4 to 0·15g per litre and, subsequently from 0·15g per litre to unleaded, when the transition to unleaded petrol is complete.
The manufacturing costs incurred in reducing the lead content from 0·40 to 0·15g per litre are believed to be about 2p to 3p per gallon. For the subsequent move to unleaded petrol, the costs are estimated to be in the order of a further 2p to 5p per gallon.However, the extent to which pump prices may be increased is purely a matter for individual petrol retailers.
Solicitor-General For Scotland
Law Changes
asked the Solicitor-General for Scotland what change will be made to the 1985–86 cash limit for class IX, vote 10, Law Charges, Scotland.
The outturn for this vote for 1984–85 showed expenditure of £107,000 in excess of that year's cash limit. The overspend arose as a result of insufficient provision necessary to meet greater manpower costs brought about by the increase in serious crime, unavoidable expenditure incurred through the provision of necessary accommodation and the establishment of Crown Office fraud and internal audit units. In accordance with normal practice, the cash limit for this Vote for this financial year is reduced by the amount of the previous year's overspend. The cash limit will therefore be reduced by £107,000 from £13,773,000 to £13,666 ,000.
Employment
Baking Industry
asked the Paymaster General what representations he has received on the Baking Industry (Hours of Work) Act 1954; and what response he has given.
The Baking Industry (Hours of Work) Act 1954 is currently being considered in the context of the proposal to repeal restrictions on women's hours of work. Consultations with employers' associations and trade unions involved in the industry are in progress. I have received written representations from four employers' associations and two trade unions. Meetings have been held. The Health and Safety Commission and the Equal Opportunities Commission have also given their views.
asked the Paymaster General what exemptions have been granted in North Staffordshire to the Baking Industry (Hours of Work) Act 1954; and if he will make a statement.
Information relating to North Staffordshire is not available. In Staffordshire as a whole, 11 employers are recorded as being exempted from the Act's provisions.Since 1980, there have been very few inquiries about the operation of the Act, no formal complaints requiring investigation have been received and no exemptions have been granted.
Aerospace Industry (Manpower)
asked the Paymaster General how many people have been employed in the United Kingdom aerospace industry in each of the last 20 years for which figures are available; and what percentage of the total numbers employed in manufacturing industry this figure represents in each of those years.
The following table gives, for the dates specified, the estimated number of employees in employment in the aerospace equipment manufacturing and repairing industry in Great Britain (figures are not available for the United Kingdom for some of the years). The Department's employment statistics are analysed according to the Standard Industrial Classification. The figures for June 1966 to June 1981 are for minimum list heading 383 of the 1968 SIC, while those for June 1982 to June 1985 are for activity heading 3640 of the 1980 SIC. The figures for September 1981 are given on both bases.
| Employees in Employment—Aerospace equipment manufacturing and repairing Great Britain | |||
| 1968 SIC MLH 383 | 1980 SIC AH 3640 | As a percentage of employees in employment in manufacturing industries per cent. | |
| June 1966 | 239,000 | ∗ | 2·8 |
| June 1967 | 244,000 | ∗ | 3·0 |
| June 1968 | 239,000 | ∗ | 3·0 |
| June 1969 | 237,000 | ∗ | 2·9 |
| June 1970 | 227,000 | ∗ | 2·8 |
| June 1971 | 211,400 | ∗ | 2·7 |
| June 1972 | 201,000 | ∗ | 2·6 |
| June 1973 | 195,400 | ∗ | 2·5 |
| June 1974 | 203,400 | ∗ | 2·6 |
| June 1975 | 204,400 | ∗ | 2·8 |
| June 1976 | 197,300 | ∗ | 2·8 |
| June 1977 | 186,300 | ∗ | 2·6 |
| June 1978 | 183,900 | ∗ | 2·6 |
| June 1979 | 187,600 | ∗ | 2·6 |
| June 1980 | 190,100 | ∗ | 2·8 |
| June 1981 | 184,800 | ∗ | 3·0 |
| September 1981 | 184,300 | 185,000 | 3·1 |
1968 SIC MLH 383
| 1980 SIC AH 3640
| As a percentage of employees in employment in manufacturing industries per cent.
| |
| June 1982 | ∗ | 173,200 | 3·0 |
| June 1983 | ∗ | 161,700 | 2·9 |
| June 1984 | ∗ | 155,200 | 2·9 |
| June 1985 | ∗ | 152,300 | 2·8 |
∗Not available
Community Programme (Finance)
asked the Paymaster General if he will approve sufficient increases in the operating costs of community programmes in their training budgets and in the wages of their employees to take account of the inflation rate since the inception of the community programmes.
We keep under review the maximum levels of approved costs which can be reimbursed under the community programme and make changes whenever this would improve the cost-effective use of taxpayers' money.
Community Programme (Ex-Service Men)
asked the Paymaster General if he will review the regulations governing the community programme to ensure that ex-service men who are in
| Table 1: Employees in employment: changes between June 1979 and June 1985 | ||||
| All industries and services | Manufacturing Industries | Service Industries | Metal Goods Engineering and Vehicles | |
| South East | —213,000 | —337,000 | 200,000 | —151,000 |
| East Anglia | 4,000 | —29,000 | 48,000 | —10,000 |
| South West | —57,000 | —71,000 | 31,000 | —39,000 |
| West Midlands | —312,000 | —289,000 | 13,000 | —182,000 |
| East Midlands | —137,000 | —116,000 | 14,000 | —50,000 |
| Yorkshire and Humberside | —263,000 | —199,000 | —7,000 | —71,000 |
| North West | —309,000 | —295,000 | 33,000 | —102,000 |
| North | —220,000 | —125,000 | —31,000 | —60,000 |
| Wales | —133,000 | —110,000 | 8,000 | —39,000 |
| Scotland | —163,000 | —171,000 | 54,000 | —77,000 |
| Table 2: Employees in Employment: percentage changes between June 1979 and June 1985 | ||||
| All industries and services per cent. | Manufacturing industries per cent. | Service industries per cent. | Metal Goods Engineering and Vehicles per cent. | |
| South East | —3 | —18 | +4 | —16 |
| East Anglia | +1 | —14 | +12 | —11 |
| South West | —4 | —16 | +3 | —18 |
| West Midlands | —14 | —29 | +1 | —30 |
| East Midlands | —9 | —19 | +2 | —21 |
| Yorkshire and Humberside | —13 | —28 | —1 | —29 |
| North West | —12 | —31 | +2 | —26 |
| North | —18 | —31 | —5 | —33 |
| Wales | —13 | —35 | +1 | —32 |
| Scotland | —8 | —28 | +4 | —30 |
Ex-service men in receipt of service pensions are already able to participate in the community programme if their circumstances accord with the criteria for priority entry. We keep these criteria under review but have no present plans for change.
Labour Statistics
asked the Paymaster General if he will publish a table showing (a) the number and percentage of jobs lost by regional area between June 1979 and June 1985 in (i) all manufacturing industries, (ii) service industries, (iii) all industries, (iv) shipbuilding and (v) engineering industries and (b) the numbers of long-term unemployed by regional area in June 1979 and June 1985.
Information about job gains and job losses is not available from the Department's statistics, but an indication of the net changes can be seen by comparing levels of employment at different dates.Tables 1 and 2 give, for the areas, dates and categories specified, the net numerical and percentage changes in the numbers of employees in employment.Separate estimates of employees in employment in the shipbuilding and engineering industries are not available for regions, and the figures are combined with other activities within the metal goods, engineering and vehicles division of the 1980 standard industrial classification.
July 1979 and July 1985 are not comparable because of the change in the basis of the count in October 1982, the 1983 Budget provisions which mean that some men, mainly
aged 60 or over, no longer need to sign on at unemployment benefit offices to receive benefit, and the change to the new ward-based system.
| Table 3: Persons unemployed for over 12 months | ||
| Region | Registrants— July 1979 | Claimants—July 1985 |
| South East | 59,850 | 279,206 |
| East Anglia | 7,210 | 27,366 |
| South West | 23,349 | 68,318 |
| West Midlands | 33,753 | 162,576 |
| East Midlands | 19,934 | 79,114 |
| Yorkshire and Humberside | 30,475 | 126,246 |
| North West | 61,612 | 201,431 |
| North | 32,521 | 106,502 |
| Wales | 23,043 | 75,882 |
| Scotland | 48,796 | 142,645 |
Tuc Education Service
asked the Paymaster General how much grant the Trades Union Congress education service receives; and what were the figures for 1982–83, 1983–84 and 1984–85.
The Trades Union Congress education service estimates that it will take up £1·599 million of the £1·704 million grant made available to it by the Government for education and training by the TUC and affiliated unions in 1985–86. In the years 1982–83, 1983–84 and 1984–85, the totals of grant paid were £1,598,571, £1,545,726 and £1,532,962 respectively.
Jobcentre Registrations
asked the Paymaster General how many people are registered with jobcentres in England and Wales at the latest available date.
On 3 January 1986 there were 379,385 persons registered at jobcentres in England and Wales.
Health And Safety At Work Etc Act 1974
asked the Paymaster General whether he will seek to amend section 6 of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
Yes.
Departmental Office (North Stockport)
asked the Paymaster General what steps he is taking to ensure the health and welfare of staff and claimants using the Department of Employment unemployment benefit office at Wellesley house, Wellington road, North Stockport, in view of the problems being faced in that office.
I am not aware of any particular problems facing the unemployment benefit offices in Wellesley house at the moment.
Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs
India (British Citizens)
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is his latest estimate of the number of British overseas citizens in India.
There are an estimated 36,000 British overseas citizens resident in India.
Entry Clearance
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the estimated cost of administering entry clearance at overseas posts in 1986–87.
The estimated cost of administering entry clearance at overseas posts in 1986–87 is £17·4 million. This includes the cost of local support staff and services.
Special Quota Vouchers
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what provision exists to ensure that, where special quota vouchers in India are not taken up by those to whom they are allocated, the full number of 600 is issued.
In order to ensure that the quota of vouchers is issued a greater number of vouchers is offered to applicants. The non take-up rate has remained steady in recent years at around 25 per cent.
Staff Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many permanent staff are engaged principally in work related to (a) foreign and Commonwealth affairs and (b) specifically relating to the Overseas Development Administration; and whether this has changed since 1979.
The average estimated provision for permanent United Kingdom-based staff employed by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in 1985–86 is 9,885. Of these, 8,330 are principally engaged in Foreign and Commonwealth affairs, and 1,555 in Overseas Development Administration. The overall reduction in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office staff provision since 1979 is 14 per cent.
Overseas Development
Shared Scholarship Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many of the 50 additional scholarships made available under the Overseas Development Administration shared scholarship scheme have been applied for by polytechnics or other local authority higher education colleges; and if he will make a statement on the level of response.
Only two polytechnics applied to join with the ODA in offering awards under the scheme for study to begin in the academic year 1986–87. They requested and were allocated one award each. All universities and polytechnics (central institutions in Scotland) were invited to participate in the scheme. The overall response was good but that from the polytechnics and central institutions was disappointing. We are considering ways of encouraging a better response from them in future.
Defence
Select Committee On Defence
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many permanent staff are engaged primarily in work related to the Defence Committee; and whether this has changed (a) since 1979 and (b) since the situation pertaining during the period of the Expenditure Subcommittee on Defence and External Affairs 1970 to 1979.
Two of my Department's permanent staff's duties are primarily related to the Defence Select Committee. The corresponding figure for the number of staff so engaged prior to early 1983, including the period of the Defence and External Affairs Sub-Committee of the Select Committee on Expenditure, was three.
Merchant Shipping
asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether it was on his authority that the Royal Navy has expressed to the official Broadsheet concern about the decline of British merchant shipping; and if he will make a statement.
The Government expressed their concern about the possible defence implications of the decline of the United Kingdom's merchant fleet continuing for several more years at the present rate in paragraph 459 of volume I of the "Statement on the Defence Estimates 1985" (Cmnd. 9430).
Broadsheet 85, which is published annually by the Royal Navy, reflects this concern.
Hms Challenger
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if any major repairs or refit work is due for HMS Challenger; and if he will make a statement.
Improvements are required to be made in the diving system of HMS Challenger. Following competitive tendering the contract has been awarded to Thorn-EMI and the work will take place, under subcontract, at Humber Shiprepairers.During 1986 HMS Challenger is also due to undergo a short docking period for routine maintenance.
Low-Flying Aircraft
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many low-flying sorties were flown by military aircraft over land in the United Kingdom during the Christmas and new year period in 1985–86.
Between 24 December 1985 and 2 January 1986 inclusive, military low flying took place in the United Kingdom on 30 and 31 December, and 2 January. The total number of sorties flown was 356.
Submarines
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he made of the implications for the maintenance of competition in the market for United Kingdom built conventional submarines of the placing of the orders for three follow-on Upholder class patrol submarines with a single yard; and if he will make a statement.
Three yards tendered for the recent order. We fully expect to be able to place future Upholder class submarine orders by competition.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence when he expects the next tenders will be sought for further Upholder class patrol submarines; and if he will make a statement.
No decisions have yet been taken on the size and timing of future orders for this class, but I would expect that these orders would be placed in the early 1990s.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence (1) if he will indicate the discounts offered for a batch order of three follow-on Upholder class patrol vessels recently offered by (a) Cammell Laird-Vickers Shipbuilding and Engineering, (b) Scott Lithgow and (c) Yarrows, respectively;(2) if he will estimate the saving to public funds of placing the three recent orders for Upholder class patrol vessels with a single yard as against dividing them between yards.
Details of individual tenders are commercially confidential. The overall cost is, however, some £20 million below the figure which my Ministry was expecting to have to pay for these submarines, about one half due to competition and one half to batch ordering.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the manner in which the Cammell Laird-Vickers tender for three follow-on Upholder class patrol submarines represented significantly the best value for money to his Department.
Competition was strong, but after full assessment of all the tenders received we concluded that the Cammell Laird-Vickers bid offered substantially the best value for money to the defence budget.
Scott Lithgow (Shipping Orders)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence (1) when he currently plans to place with Scott Lithgow the orders for (a) the range mooring vessel and (b) each of the powered mooring lighters; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he will make it his policy to place the orders with Scott Lithgow for the range mooring vessel and the two powered mooring lighters not later than the spring of 1986; and if he will make a statement;(3) what account he has taken of the work currently available to the Scott Lithgow yard in deciding the timing of placing there of orders
(a) for the range mooring vessel and (b) each of the powered mooring lighters; and if he will make a statement.
In view of the wider and more relevant factors the Government have decided to place an order for a range mooring vessel with Scott Lithgow later this year, followed by two lighters, subject to the negotiation of satisfactory terms and conditions. This timing reflects our operational requirements. Scott Lithgow will continue to be invited to tender for all MOD new construction and refit work which it is capable of undertaking. But it must be competitive if it is to win future orders.
Departmental Staff (Holiday Vetting)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether any employees in his Department have to be vetted by the American Central Intelligence Agency before they are allowed to go on holiday to Warsaw pact or other countries.
No.
Fife Region (Civil Servants)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list for each office or establishment of his Department in the Fife region the number of Civil Service posts at the following grades (a) clerical assistant, (b) clerical officer, (c) executive officer, (d) higher executive officer, (e) senior executive officer, (f) principal, (g) deputy principal and (h) senior deputy principal; and what is the current rate of turnover in staff.
[pursuant to his reply, 20 December 1985, c. 380]: I regret that the information requested is not held centrally in the form requested; and refer the hon. Member to the information supplied to him in a letter from my hon. Friend the Minister of State, Treasury dated 7 January 1986.
Education And Science
School Meals
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list in the Official Report the average cost of a school meal in each local education authority in England.
The Department does not have the information from which to calculate the average cost of a school meal.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will make a statement on the nutritional standard of school meals provided by local education authorities with particular reference to the provisions of the Education Act 1980.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my hon. Friend the Minister of State to the hon. Member for Leeds, West (Mr. Meadowcroft) on 17 December 1985 at column 113.
University Applicants
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science how many university applicants there were in each year since 1978–79; and how many candidates were finally accepted in each of those years.
Applicants and acceptances through the Universities' Central Council on admissions scheme for universities in the United Kingdom were as follows:
| Academic year of entry | Applicants | Acceptances |
| 1978 | 157,506 | 80,530 |
| 1979 | 166,362 | 82,398 |
| 1980 | 168,354 | 84,695 |
| 1981 | 167,096 | 80,341 |
| 1982 | 171,496 | 77,752 |
Academic year of entry
| Applicants
| Acceptances
|
| 1983 | 172,738 | 74,860 |
| 1984 | 173,674 | 77,431 |
| 1985 | 176,553 | 82,889 |
Assisted Places Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will provide figures relating to the percentage distribution of parents of children participating in the assisted places scheme according to the contributory scales used by the Department, for the latest three years for which figures are available.
The information requested is as follows:
| Relevant income bands (at 1984 prices) £ | Percentage distribution | ||
| 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | |
| Up to 6,046 | 38·3 | 36·2 | 39·7 |
| 6,047–6,390 | 2·7 | 3·0 | 3·4 |
| 6,391–6,910 | 5·2 | 6·2 | 5·1 |
| 6,911–7,950 | 11·2 | 12·0 | 10·4 |
| 7,951–9,550 | 17·7 | 17·9 | 16·9 |
| 9,551–11,630 | 17·0 | 17·4 | 16·2 |
| 11,631 upwards | 7·9 | 7·3 | 8·3 |
Replan Programme
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he will make a statement about the future of the REPLAN Programme.
The programme now known as REPLAN, which seeks to encourage the development of educational opportunities for unemployed adults, was announced on 5 March 1984 at column 411, initially as a three-year programme. The programme, which covers England and Wales, is jointly funded by the Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office, with the Manpower Services Commission contributing to the cost of certain projects. REPLAN's main elements so far have included the appointment of a team of advisory field officers employed by the National Institute of Adult Continuing Education; programmes of development projects (64 approved so far) managed by NIACE and the further education unit; staff development programmes organised by NIACE in collaboration with the regional advisory councils and the Welsh joint education committee; and an associated programme of education support grants under which 80 local education authorities have received approval for projects concerned with the planning, co-ordination and development of provision for the unemployed.My right hon. Friends the Secretaries of State for Education and Science and for Wales have now reviewed REPLAN's work to date. They are satisfied that the programme has already provided valuable support for those seeking to develop educational provision for the unemployed, and is helping the development of coordinated local responses between the many institutions and agencies involved.My right hon. Friends have agreed that the duration of REPLAN should be extended, in the first instance, to December 1988. In the light of a further review of progress, a decision will be taken during 1986 on whether to extend the programme to December 1989; and the case for further 12 month extensions will be considered annually thereafter in the same way. Under this arrangement, the REPLAN Programme will be assured of a three-year planning horizon for so long as the annual reviews suggest that a continuing need for the programme can be foreseen.
Research Funding
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what action he is taking on the Science and Engineering Research Council report about the current level of funding of research into (a) new alloys and ceramics and (b) optical computers.
These areas of research were included amongst the growth points mentioned in the Science and Engineering Research Council's corporate plan published in December.On the advice of the ABRC the Secretary of State has increased the funds available to the SERC for strategic research in science and technology for 1986–87 by £8 million and increases have also been made to the Council's planning figures for 1987–88 and 1988–89. The precise distribution of these additional funds between competing priority areas is a matter for decision by the council but I understand that the two areas raised in the question are among those likely to benefit.
Higher And Further Education (Statistics)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what information he has regarding the numbers of schoolchildren in (a) Derbyshire and (b) Amber Valley who went on to higher/further education in 1985, compared with 1979.
Figures for the academic year 1984–85 are not yet available. Information for 1978–79 and 1983–84 for Derbyshire is as follows. Data are not available centrally for areas smaller than local education authorities.
| Leavers from maintained schools in Derbyshire intending to pursue full-time courses of further or higher education | ||
| Academic year | Number (000s) | Percentage of total leavers |
| 1978–79 | 2·63 | 19·0 |
| 1983–84 | 3·75 | 26·7 |
Secondary Education Certificates (Examination Results)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what information he has regarding the recent trend in the proportion of pupils in (a) Derbyshire and (b) Amber Valley gaining A-levels, 0-levels and certificate of secondary education.
Information for 1981–82, 1982–83 and 1983–84 for Derbyshire is as follows. Data are not available centrally for areas smaller than local education authorities.
Examination achievements of leavers maintained schools in Derbyshire Percentage of total leavers
| |||
Academic year
| |||
1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84
| |
| 1 or more A level | 12·3 | 13·2 | 11·9 |
| No A level 5 or more higher grade passes at O level or CSE | 9·7 | 11·3 | 11·4 |
| 1-4 higher grade passes at O level or CSE | 27·9 | 26·2 | 28·1 |
| No higher grades, but 1 or more other grade | 41·6 | 39·4 | 41·0 |
| No graded result | 8·5 | 9·9 | 7·5 |
Sacred Heart Of Mary Girls' School, Upminster
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will approve the expenditure which is necessary for the enlargement of the Sacred Heart of Mary girls' school at Upminster; and if he will state when the decision will be taken and announced.
Allocations under the 1986–87 education capital expenditure programme were announced on 18 December 1985. Unfortunately it did not prove possible, within the resources available, to include an amount for the project at the Sacred Heart of Mary girls' school.
Refugees (Grants)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will take steps to extend mandatory educational grants to refugees in the United Kingdom who are not granted refugee status but given exceptional leave to remain in the United Kingdom because of the dangers they might encounter in their own country.
There is no intention to exempt those granted exceptional leave to remain from the requirement that all students, except those granted refugee status, must he resident in this country for three years in order to be eligible for a mandatory award.
National Finance
Income Tax
13.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on his policy towards the taxation of families.
We shall be putting forward our views on this issue in the Green Paper in due course.
21.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the effective marginal tax rate on earnings of those in the lower tax band; and how this compares with other major industrialised countries.
The marginal income tax rate on earnings for those in the lowest tax band in this country is 30 per cent. This is the second highest rate amongst the OECD countries.
24.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received in the last six months on the level of income tax; and if he will make a statement.
We have received a wide range of representations on this issue in the last six months.
27.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what would be the effect on the net disposable income of a single man earning £100 per week gross of the Government devoting £1 ,200 ,000 ,000 to (a) raising income tax thresholds uniformly or (b) reducing the basic rate of income tax.
A single man would get an increase in net income of 69p and 55p per week, respectively, based on the illustrative allowances shown in the autumn statement.
30.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what increase in take-home pay would be received by a person earning £140 a week if the basic rate of income tax were reduced from 30 per cent. to 28 per cent.
46.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what increase in take-home pay would be received by a person earning £140 a week if the basic rate of income tax were reduced from 30 to 28 per cent.
£1·90 per week for a single person or working wife and £1·39 for a married man in 1986–87, based on the illustrative allowances shown in the autumn statement.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what proportion of tax units do not pay any income tax; what were the equivalent figures for each year since 1978–79; and what was the average income of each tax unit in this group in each year at constant prices.
Estimates of the proportion of tax units who do not pay income tax are as follows. The figures exclude young people aged under 16 and those over 16 still at school. I regret that there is insufficient information to provide reliable estimates of the average income of this group.
| Year | Percentage of tax units∗ who do not pay income tax |
| 1978–79 | 26·5 |
| 1979–80 | 26-5 |
| 1980–81 | 29·4 |
| 1981–82 | 31·0 |
| 1982–83 | 31·4 |
| 1983–84 | 33·1 |
| 1984–85 | 34·0 |
| 1985–86 | 34·5 |
Companies (Government Holdings)
14.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how those companies in which Her Majesty's Government retain a minority shareholding but previously had a majority shareholding have performed since the disposal by Her Majesty's Government of their majority stake.
The recent results of privatised companies have generally been excellent.
United States (Budget Deficit)
17.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what discussions he has had with United States officials, since he last answered questions, about the United States budget deficit; and if he will make a statement.
I welcome the moves made by the United States Administration to reduce their budget deficit, but it is clear that further progress is necessary.
Economic Strategy
18.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his assessment of the effect of recent changes in oil prices on his economic strategy.
I have nothing to add to what my right hon. Friend the Chancellor said in answer to an earlier question.
Taxation
19.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the proportion of gross domestic product taken in taxation compared with that in the United States of America and in Japan.
The latest available data, published by OECD, for 1983 are as follows:
| Percentage of GDP at market prices | ||
| Total tax revenue and social security contributions | Total tax revenue excluding social security contributions | |
| United Kingdom | 37·8 | 31·1 |
| United States of America | 29·0 | 20·7 |
| Japan | 27·7 | 19·4 |
Source: OECD "Revenue Statistics of OECD Member Countries 1965–1984" page 82.
Inflation Restraint
20.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what are the implications of his policy on restraining the rate of inflation for his policies towards the levels of other economic indicators.
The Government's success in reducing inflation, together with their supply-side policies, has led to a sustained expansion of output and employment.
Value Added Tax (Evasion)
22.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the estimated loss of revenue from value added tax evasion.
By the very nature of tax evasion, it is not possible to give a reliable estimate. Customs and Excise has, however, indicated that the VAT revenue lost may total between £300 million and £500 million a year.
Free Ports
23.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the progress of the experimental free ports.
Six experimental free zones were designated on 6 August 1984. Four —Liverpool, Southampton, Belfast and Prestwick —are already operational, and another—Birmingham—is expected to be operational later this year.
Johnson Matthey Bankers
25.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what study he has made of the latest set of accounts from Johnson Matthey Bankers; and if he will make a statement.
My hon. Friend has read them with interest.
29.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if, when he next meets the Governor of the Bank of England, he will raise with him the latest annual report of Johnson Matthey Bankers Limited; and if he will make a statement.
The Chancellor and the Governor meet regularly and discuss a wide range of matters, but it is not the practice to disclose them.
43.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the proposed sale of Johnson Matthey Bankers by the Bank of England.
The proposed sale of JMB is a matter for the Bank of England.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many statutory returns were submitted by the Johnson Matthey Bank in the 12-month period preceding its collapse and rescue.
[pursuant to his reply, 15 January 1986, c. 594]: I assume the hon. Member has in mind returns submitted to the Bank of England, although the White Paper "Banking Supervision" (Cmnd. 9695) explained that such returns are not strictly statutory. I understand from the Bank of England that in the 12 months preceding 1 October 1984 about 100 returns of about 23 different types were submitted by JMB for a variety of purposes including the preparation of monetary and economic statistics as well as banking supervision.
Johnson Matthey Metals
26.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent representations he has had from the Governor of the Bank of England regarding Johnson Matthey Metals; and if he will make a statement.
None.
Inflation
28.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent representations he has received on the likely trend of inflation in 1986.
Most outside forecasts are broadly in line with the autumn statement which forecasts the annual rate of increase in the RPI declining to 3¾per cent. by the fourth quarter of 1986.
37.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he makes as to the relative impact of inflation on those of (a) below average and (b) above average incomes.
Apart from the pensioner price indices, measures of inflation for separate income groups are not compiled.
39.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his estimate of the inflation rate for 1986.
A forecast of 3¾per cent. for the rate of inflation, as measured by the increase in the retail prices index, in the fourth quarter of 1986 was given in the autumn statement.
42.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he will make a statement on the current factors affecting the rate of inflation.
Many factors affect inflation, but further progress on reducing it requires the maintenance of sound financial conditions. The prospects for inflation are set out in the autumn statement.
45.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the current inflation rate.
Over the 12 months to November 1985, the retail prices index increased by 5·5 per cent.
Central Computer And Telecommunications Agency
31.
asked the Chancellor of the Excehequer what are the objectives of the Central Computer and Telecommunications Agency; how he monitors its effectiveness; and if he will make a statement.
I refer my hon. Friend to the publications "Information Technology in the Civil Service", IT series Nos. 8 and 11, copies of which are in the Library.
Job Creation
32.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what tax measures he has taken to encourage the creation of new jobs.
The whole thrust of our tax policy has been to promote the creation of new job opportunities and to improve incentives to work.
Shareholders
33.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what information he has as to the number of individual shareholders in 1979 and at the latest date for which figures are available.
According to Inland Revenue data, the number of individual shareholders in 1979 was about 1½million. This number has probably at least doubled since then although recent market research suggests that the figure may now be much higher.
Exchange Rates
34.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the present exchange rate between the pound sterling and the deutschmark.
The deutschmark/sterling exchange rate was 3·5432 at close of business on 15 January.
41.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what changes there have been over the past two months in the value of the pound on the foreign exchange.
The sterling index closed at 79·5 on 15 November and 78·0 on 15 January.
Local Authorities (Capital Receipts)
35.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what are the Treasury reasons for seeking to ensure that local authorities are not allowed to spend their capital receipts as they see fit.
The Government are committed to tight control of public expenditure of which capital expenditure by local authorities forms part. In order to be able to plan expenditure and to ensure these plans are met, the Government must ensure that receipts are drawn down and spent at an orderly rate. There is no restriction on the investment of the cash or its use to repay debt, or on the services for which receipts can be used to justify additional spending, within local authorities' normal powers.
Economic Growth
36.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what are the latest projections for the growth of demand in the economy over the coming year.
47.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the level of total demand in the economy.
The Government's latest projections for growth in the economy are as in the autumn statement, where the forecast for 1986 growth in output is 3 per cent.
Bradford
38.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when a Treasury Minister last paid an official visit to Bradford; and for what purpose.
My right hon. Friend the Chancellor visited Bradford on 7 December 1984 during a regional tour in Yorkshire.
| Business Expansion Scheme Investments | ||||
| 1983–84 | 1984–85* | |||
| Number of companies | Amount invested | Number of companies | Amount invested | |
| £million | £million | |||
| Scotland | 59 | 4·8 | 37 | 2·6 |
| United Kingdom total | 715 | 105·0 | 507 | 100·1 |
| Per cent. | Per cent. | Per cent. | Per cent. | |
| Scotland as percentage of United Kingdom total | 8 | 5 | 7 | 3 |
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his policy towards the use of the business expansion scheme for the provision of bed and breakfast accommodation for homeless families; and whether the use of the scheme for this purpose is limited to people designated as homeless under the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Personal Allowances
40.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will introduce legislation to establish transferability of personal allowances between husband and wife.
This is one of the subjects which will be discussed in the Green Paper on personal taxation.
Bank Of England
44.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he last met the Governor of the Bank of England; and what topics were discussed.
My right hon. Friend the Chancellor meets the Governor regularly for confidential discussions about a wide range of matters.
Privatisation
48.
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he has revised the sum he expects to raise from sales of assets during 1986–87 quoted in the autumn statement.
No.
Business Expansion Scheme
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the total spent in Scotland under the business expansion scheme and the number of applicants from Scotland who benefited for the last year for which figures are available; and if he will give the Scottish totals in each case as a percentage of those for the United Kingdom as a whole.
The table gives the final estimates for investments made in 1983–84. Information for 1984–85 is not yet complete and the figures are based on the information currently available.
Select Committees (Reports)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many copies of each of the departmental Select Committees' reports have been sold to the public, distributed to Government Departments and distributed via the Vote Office in the current Parliament to date.
The information is as follows:
| Select Committee | Number of Reports Published | Average Number of each Report Sold | Average Number of each Report Supplied to Vote Office |
| Agriculture | 14 | 385 | 125 |
| Defence | 13 | 653 | 148 |
| Education Science & Arts | 6 | 553 | 125 |
| Employment | 14 | 394 | 140 |
| Energy | 24 | 570 | 130 |
| Foreign Affairs | 16 | 611 | 145 |
| Home Affairs | 10 | 560 | 137 |
| Trade & Industry | 17 | 507 | l25 |
| Social Services | 16 | 867 | 136 |
| Transport | 14 | 498 | 25 |
| Treasury & Civil Service | 32 | 506 | 36 |
| Scottish Affairs | 7 | 479 | 25 |
| Welsh Affairs | 5 | 376 | 125 |
| Environment | 19 | 556 | 125 |
| Parliamentary Commissioner For Administration | 8 | 437 | 125 |
Note:
All copies are regarded as sold except those provided to the Vote Office on initial publication.
Productivity Statistics
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the level of output per man hour in the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Japan, Germany, France, Italy and Sweden for each year since 1955; and what has been the percentage change each year for each country.
Figures of hours worked and hence of output per man hour for the whole economy are not available for the United Kingdom. Index numbers of output per man are compiled and published in Economic Trends, with information on percentage changes given in the national accounts Blue Book. Index numbers of output per man hour for manufacturing industry are published in Economic Trends.Information of the kind requested for the other countries is not available in the main international statistical publications. However, the most recent (December 1985) issue of the OECD "Economic Outlook" provides some information on productivity developments in manufacturing since the 1960s for the countries requested (table 18, page 47.)All the publications referred to are available in the Library of the House.
New Cross Building Society
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if, in the light of subsequent events, he has any reason to modify the statement in Cmnd. 9033 on the New Cross building society that in a matter of months the society might not have been able to repay investors; if he plans to publish evidence if the statement remains justified; and if he will make a statement.
The passage to which my hon. Friend refers (paragraph 4 "New Cross building society", Cmnd. 9033) summarised fairly the conclusions which the Chief Registrar had reached in his decision on the proposed statutory orders against the New Cross Building Society (reprinted as appendix 5 to Cmnd. 9033, specifically in paragraph 15·5). Subsequent events have done nothing to cast doubts on the Chief Registrar's assessment.
Orphans (Taxation)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will seek to amend sections 16 to 18 of the Finance Act 1973 so as to reduce tax payable by orphaned children who receive low incomes from their parents' estate.
I am not sure what the hon. Member has in mind. Under sections 16 to 18 Finance Act 1971 the income of certain discretionary or accumulation trusts is subject to tax at the additional rate of 15 per cent. as well as the basic rate of 30 per cent. A payment to a beneficiary is treated as having suffered tax at 45 per cent., but where the beneficiary is not liable to pay tax, or is liable at less than 45 per cent., he or she can then reclaim all or part of the tax paid by the trustees.
Value Added Tax
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what amounts included within the totals shown in the 1985 annual report of Her Majesty's Customs and Excise of under declarations of tax discovered on control visits represent no loss to the Exchequer because the value added tax charged would have been recoverable by another.
Exact figures are not available since it is impracticable to classify precisely underdeclarations of tax discovered on control visits in order to identify with certainty the tax which would have been recoverable by another registered trader. However, a statistical sampling exercise conducted by Customs and Excise in 1983–84 suggests that the figure is probably of the order of 10 per cent. (£40 million). The total of underdeclarations shown in the annual report (£409 million) does not include the preventive effect of control visiting which is estimated to provide additional revenue of at least an equivalent value.
Unleaded Petrol
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if, pursuant to his reply to the hon. Member for Ellesmere Port and Neston on 14 May 1985, Official Report, column 86, the Government have yet decided whether to tax unleaded petrol, when it is available, at the same rate as leaded petrol; and if he will make a statement.
No decision has yet been taken on the tax treatment of unleaded petrol. This was one of the points on which the Government invited comment in the discussion paper issued last year, and the responses to this paper are still being examined.
Diorama
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what plans the Crown Estate Commissioners have for the redevelopment of the Diorama; and what representations he has received from those opposed to the scheme.
I understand that the Crown Estate Commissioners have made a planning application to redevelop the Diorama. Their intention is to restore and preserve the remaining original features whilst converting much of the interior to high quality residential accommodation. Provision will be made for an exhibition area, with public access, and two proposed atria will give a view of part of the interior of the building.I have not received any representations on the Commissioners' proposals.
Ec (Budget Contributions)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the total net payment made by the United Kingdom to the EEC since 1 January 1973; if he will express this as a net amount per day of membership; and what estimate he has made of the comparable net daily cost in 1987.
[pursuant to his reply, 13 January 1986, c. 511.]: The latest available figure for the United Kingdom's net contribution to the Community budget is for the period 1 January 1973 to 30 September 1985. It is £6,527 million. This represents an average net payment of £1·40 million a day since accession. These figures do not take into account the United Kingdom's 1,000 mecu (£604 million) abatement paid over the period 31 December 1985 to 6 January 1986.Projections of our net contribution to the Community budget for future calendar years are not published. Information on our net contribution in the financial year 1987–88 is contained in the public expenditure White Paper published on 15 January.
Environment
Sensory Handicap
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what study is taking place on the needs of the sensory handicapped regarding the appropriation of incorporating special requirements in building access regulations, and the provision of telephones which can be used by the hearing-impaired; and if he will make a statement.
No formal study is under way on the incorporation in building access regulations of special requirements for people with sensory handicaps.
| Supply Area | Parameter |
| Anglian water authority Dersingham and Snettisham | Nitrate |
Building regulations apply only to buildings when they are constructed or structurally altered and they contain no powers of continuing control over buildings in use. The regulations are principally concerned therefore with the structure. The access regulations which came into force last year require certain structural measures such as ramps which will help disabled people gain access to and within buildings. The British Standard code of practice, BS5810 which supports these provisions does, however, also contain general design recommendations for additional nonstructural features which will assist people with sensory impairments.
In my earlier replies to the hon. Member of 2 July, 1985 at column 98 and 22 October, 1985 at column 88 I explained that licensing arrangements already exist to ensure that emergency telephones in lifts can be inductively coupled to hearing aids. In addition, British Telecom require that telephones in all public call boxes, should be capable of being inductively coupled to hearing aids.
Water Supplies
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will indicate the geographical area of the five water supplies in Lincolnshire in respect of which action has had to be taken to reduce the concentration of nitrates and if he will make a statement on the progress made to date by the Anglian water authority to comply with the relevant European Community directives.
The geographical areas are as follows:
two areas in and around Sleaford;
the Potterhanworth supply area;
the Waneham Bridge-Saltersford supply area;
Action has been taken by the Anglian water authority to reduce the nitrates content of water supplies to these areas below 80mg per litre on a three-monthly average. This is considered by our medical advisers to be an acceptable level. A small supply in Norfolk was taken out of use recently because the nitrate level was unacceptable.the Horbling supply area in South Kesteven.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will furnish details of the geographical areas covered by those water supplies in respect of which applications for derogations from the maximum admissible concentrations have been made by the Anglian water authority and the Yorkshire water authority; and if he will indicate which of these applications for derogations were refused.
Details of the relevant areas are attached. No applications have been refused but a number have been modified or withdrawn as a result of discussions with the Department. Applications have also been approved subject to conditions. Programmes of improvement have accompanied many of the applications including all those relating to the microbiological parameters.
Supply Area
| Parameter
|
| Docking | Nitrate |
| East Wretham | Nitrate |
| Heacham and Hunstanton | Nitrate |
| Moulton and Kennet | Nitrate |
| Wisbech | Nitrate |
| Habrough | Nitrate |
| Aswarby-Saltersford | Nitrate |
| Barrow | Nitrate |
| Binbrook | Nitrate |
| Bully Hill-Barnoldby | Nitrate |
| Bully Hill-Otby | Nitrate |
| Clay Hill-Drove | Nitrate |
| Lane Sleaford | Nitrate |
| Drove Lane Sleaford | Nitrate |
| Potterhanworth | Nitrate |
| Saltersford | Nitrate |
| Waneham Bridge-Saltersford | Nitrate |
| Bucklesham | Nitrate |
| Grundesburgh-Ufford-Melton | Nitrate, Iron, Nitrite |
| Horbling | Nitrate |
| Ely and Littleport | Nitrate |
| Habrough-Covenham | Nitrate |
| Halstead-Urban | Potassium |
| Braintree | Iron |
| Braintree-Northern Rural | Iron |
| Braintree-Kelvedon-Tiptree | Iron |
| Colchester-Lexden | Ammonia, Potassium |
| Colchester-Greenstead | Odour, Taste, Trihalomethanes |
| Colchester-South | Odour, Taste, Trihalomethanes |
| Colchester-West Bergholt | Iron, Potassium |
| Colchester-North | Iron, Potassium |
| Bures | Iron, Potassium |
| Baylham-Kirby Rise | Iron |
| Baylham-Winston | Iron |
| Bowthorpe | Nitrate |
| Belstead | Trihalomethanes |
| Heigham-Kirby Cane | Iron, Manganese |
| Heigham-Thorpe | Nitrate |
| Mattishall | Iron, Manganese |
| Mundesley | Manganese |
| Pettistree | Nitrite, Iron |
| Raydon, Belstead, Alton and Great Wenham | Odour, Taste, Trihalomethanes |
| Rushall-Bunwell | Iron |
| Stowmarket | Iron, Manganese |
| Tuddenham-Bucklesham | Nitrate |
| West Bradenham | Iron, Manganese |
| King's Lynn | Odour, Trihalomethanes |
| Alford-Driby | Iron |
| Elkesley-Grove-Newton-Ordsall Road | Iron |
| Everton | Iron |
| Gainsborough | Iron |
| Grove-Ordsall Road | Iron |
| Ordsall Road | Iron |
| Scarle | Iron |
| Winterton Holmes | Sulphate |
| Winterton Holmes-Barrow | Sulphate |
| Yorkshire WA Bulk | Iron |
| Maltby-Le-Marsh | Manganese |
| Mumby-Fordington | Iron, Manganese |
| Driby-Fordington | Iron, Manganese |
| Otby | Nitrate |
| Otby-Waddington | Nitrate |
Yorkshire water authority (southern division)Dunford Bridge Spring Source | Colour, Iron, Manganese |
| *Ewden Treatment Works Supply System | Colour, Aluminium, Manganese |
| *Ingbirchworth Treatment Works (Barnsley rural) | Aluminium, Manganese |
| *Ingbirchworth Treatment Works (Barnsley urban) | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Loxley Treatment Works Supply System | Colour, Aluminium, Manganese |
| Mossley Borehole Supply System | Iron, Manganese |
| Racecommon Borehole Supply System | Iron, Manganese |
| Rivelin Treatment Works Supply System | Aluminium, Manganese |
| Royd Moor Treatment Works | Colour, Aluminium, Iron, Manganese |
Supply Area
| Parameter
|
| Wilson Treatment Works Supply System | Manganese |
| *Agden Ram Spring Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| *Cranworth Service Reservoir Supply System | Total Coliforms |
| *Kimberworth (No. 1) Service Reservoir Supply System | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| *Moonshine Service Reservoir Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| *Sandtoft Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Stannington Service Reservoir Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Wadsley Service Reservoir Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Wickersley Service Reservoir Supply System | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
Yorkshire water authority (central division)
| |
| Eccup Supply System | Manganese |
| Hanger Lane Supply System | Manganese |
| Headingley Supply System | Colour, Iron |
| Jaw Hill Supply System | Aluminium, Iron, Fecal Coliforms |
| Gypsey Lane Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Hazelwood Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| John O'Gaunts Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Middleton Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Moortown East Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Calverley Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Garforth (1) Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms |
| Garforth (2) Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Park Hill (2) Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Tins Hill (1) Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Tinshill (3) Service Reservoir Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
Yorkshire Water Authority (North and East division)
| |
| Boltby Treatment Works Supply Area | Colour, Aluminium, Manganese |
| Stalling Busk Spring Supply System | Colour, Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Mickley Borehole Supply Area | Manganese |
| Harlow Hill/Irongate Bridge Treatment Works | Iron, Manganese |
| Baldersby Borehole Supply Area | Nitrates |
| Countersett Spring Supply Area | Colour, Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| *Kirby Malzeard Supply Area | Iron, Manganese |
| Yorkshire Derwent Grid Supply System | Total Hardness |
| Filey Borehole Supply Area | Iron |
| *Norwood Treatment Works Supply Area | Colour, Turbidity, Aluminium, Iron, Manganese, Fecal Coliforms |
| Crumma Spring Supply Area | Colour, Fecal Coliforms |
| Fossdale Spring Supply Area | Colour, Total Coliforms, Fecal |
| Marsett Spring Supply Area | Colour, Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| *Middlesmoor Spring Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Gayle Spring Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Lofthouse Spring Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Carperby Spring Supply Source | Total Coliforms |
| Cranehow Bottom Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Ellingstring Spring Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Newbiggin Spring Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Feldom Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| *Horsehouse Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Sowden Beck Spring Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| West Burton Spring Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| *Ganton Wold Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms |
| *Cockmoor Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms |
| *North Coates Road Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms |
| *Dunnington Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| *Kexmoor Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Sicklingham Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Green Hammerton Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms |
| *Gallowate Service Reservoir Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Osmotherley Service Reservoir Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
Yorkshire water authority (western division)
| |
| Addingham Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Manganese |
| High Bentham Spring Supply Area | Iron |
| *Brownhill Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium |
| Burnsall Spring Supply Area | Iron |
| Carr Bottom Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Manganese, Fecal Coliforms |
Supply Area
| Parameter
|
| Graincliffe Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Manganese |
| Fixby Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium |
| Helwith Bridge Spring Supply Area | Colour |
| Digley Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Manganese |
| Holmstyes Treatment Works Supply Area | Manganese |
| *Longwood Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Iron, Manganese |
| Moor Top Borehole Supply Area | Manganese |
| *Oldfield Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Iron |
| Panorama Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Fecal Coliforms |
| Reva Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium |
| Thornton Moor Treatment Works Supply Area | Colour, Iron |
| March Ghyll Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Manganese |
| Thornton Pressure Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium |
| Blackmoorfoot North Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Manganese, Fecal Coliforms |
| Blackmoorfoot South Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Manganese, Fecal Coliforms |
| Deerhill Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Iron, Manganese |
| Haugh Top Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Manganese |
| Withens Clough Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Manganese |
| Embsay Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Manganese |
| Hollin Hall Treatment Works Supply Area | Colour, Aluminium, Manganese |
| Ogden Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Manganese |
| Thrum Hall Treatment Works Supply Area | Aluminium, Manganese |
| Austwick Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| *Bentham High Level Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| *Bentham Low Level Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| *Blackhouse Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Burnsall Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Chapel le Dale Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| *Grassington Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Hawkswick Spring Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| Ingleton Low Level Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| *Langcliffe Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Baw Head Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Oughtershaw Spring Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Blackhill Service Reservoir Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| *Moor Lane-Menston Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| *Clough Head-Goldcar Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| *Cowersley Service Reservoir Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Gledhill Service Reservoir Supply Area | Fecal Coliforms |
| Kirkburton Service Reservoir Supply System | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
| *Star Inn Service Reservoir Supply Area | Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms |
∗Application submitted but no decision yet given.
London Borough Of Greenwich (Glc Finance)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will set out details of each payment to the London borough of Greenwich for which the Greater London council has sought his consent under section 91 of the Local Government Act 1985, indicating which have received his approval.
The following applications have been received from the GLC for consent under section 91 of the Local Government Act 1985 in respect of payments to the London borough of Greenwich:
| Scheme | Value£ |
| Parks and Open Spaces | 1,262,507 |
| Playgrounds and Fixed Equipment | 348,140 |
| Library/Community Centre building and Lake edge treatment | 335,517 |
| Homelessness initiative | 184,507 |
| Tramshed Theatre | 18,720 |
| Environmental Improvements, Woolwich High Street | 9,386 |
| Manager for Thistlebrook Traveller Caravan Site | 7,475 |
Empty Dwellings
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has about the length of time the numbers of empty dwellings in the answer of 19 December, Official Report, columns 263–4, have been empty.
Estimates based on local authorities' 1985 housing investment programme returns indicate that, of the 116,500 local authority dwellings vacant as at 1 April 1985, 26,100 had been vacant for more than a year and, of these, 13,500 had been vacant for more than two years. I do not have information about the length of time other dwellings have been empty as this is not collected centrally.
Hainault Forest
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what arrangements have been made for the management and ownership of Hainault forest in the wake of the Greater London council's abolition; and if he is satisfied that the arrangements will safeguard the forest's role and character.
Failing agreement on a single successor authority among the local authorities in whose areas Hainault forest lies, the draft general property transfer order provides for its ownership to be transferred to the London boroughs of Redbridge and Havering and to Essex county council. Management arrangements for the forest are for the three authorities to develop. A supplementary transfer order could be considered before 1 April making different provision if the authorities concerned are agreed.
Local Government (Access To Information) Act 1985
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he proposes to issue a departmental circular in respect of the provisions of the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985 before the Act comes into force on 1 April.
Yes. My Department has now received comments from the local authority associations and other bodies on a draft of the circular sent to them on 29 November 1985. This was the subject of a departmental news release (No. 592 of 1985) a copy of which is available in the Library.
Housing Revenue Account Dwellings
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what was the value of Exchequer subsidies and rate fund contributions, separately, to local authorities' housing revenue account dwellings, on a per dwelling basis, for the years 1978–79 to 1985–86, and the
| 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | 1984–85 | 1985–86 | |
| Greater Manchester Bury | 0 | 0 | 0 | 138,700 | 0 |
| Merseyside St. Helens | 0 | 887,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| South Yorkshire | |||||
| Tyne and Wear South Tyneside | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,841,278 | 1,327,550 |
| West Midlands | |||||
| Birmingham | 0 | 0 | 0 | 273,300 | 0 |
| Dudley | 0 | 0 | 1,000,000 | 1,750,000 | 0 |
| West Yorkshire | |||||
| Kensington and Chelsea | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 247,540 |
| Barking and Dagenham | 0 | 1,138,713 | 2,840,000 | 2,544,000 | 4,323,500 |
| Barnet | 0 | 428,492 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bexley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,268,100 | 8,000 |
| Bromley | 48,064 | 69,855 | 159,080 | 2,294,956 | 0 |
| Ealing | 0 | 218,349 | 183,974 | 682,892 | 983,700 |
| Havering | 216,660 | 1,651,025 | 1,917,311 | 1 | 329,960 |
| Hillingdon | 1,129,757 | 693,033 | 954,514 | 1,112,610 | 1,902,180 |
| Kingston-upon-Thames | 0 | 1,894,601 | 1,321,994 | 1,884,789 | 2,445,200 |
| Merton | 0 | 0 | 1,030,903 | 1,313,855 | 0 |
| Redbridge | 0 | 0 | 12,000 | 90,000 | 90,000 |
| Sutton | 0 | 191,169 | 321,408 | 367,360 | 347,600 |
| Avon | |||||
| Wansdyke | 0 | 0 | 464,500 | 1,926,800 | 1,366,200 |
| Woodspring | 300,784 | 1,060,398 | 809,979 | 635,723 | 683,390 |
| Bedfordshire South Bedfordshire | 0 | 0 | 30,517 | 65,646 | 76,485 |
The available information is as follows. It is based on information provided by local authorities in their housing subsidy claim forms. The 1985–86 figures are estimates; estimates for 1986–87 are not yet available.
| Year | Housing subsidy per dwelling £ | Net rate fund contribution per dwelling£ |
| 1978–79 | 198·27 | 40·73 |
| 1979–80 | 253·10 | 65·43 |
| 1980–81 | 281·36 | 86·77 |
| 1981–82 | 175·96 | 82·06 |
| 1982–83 | 90·61 | 88·47 |
| 1983–84 | 69·04 | 85·88 |
| 1984–85 | 83·00 | 92·06 |
| 1985–86 | 95·89 | 95·19 |
Housing Revenue Account Surpluses
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list all the local authorities in England which showed a surplus on their housing revenue account in each year since 1981–82, giving the figures in each case.
The available information is as follows. It is based on information provided by local authorities in their housing subsidy claim forms:
1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84
| 1984–85
| 1985–86
| |
Berkshire
| |||||
| Bracknell | 168,900 | 60,000 | 14,000 | 91,345 | 295,700 |
| Newbury | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 143,700 |
| Reading | 0 | 0 | 0 | 437,924 | 445,000 |
| Slough | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 0 | 0 |
| Windsor and Maidenhead | 137,190 | 111,692 | 521,044 | 817,145 | 1,030,000 |
| Wokingham | 9,484 | 40,436 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Buckinghamshire
| |||||
| Beaconsfield | 76,330 | 71,333 | 809,678 | 611,539 | 167,265 |
| Wycombe | 1,109,000 | 0 | 0 | 400,000 | 420,000 |
Cambridgeshire
| |||||
| East Cambridgeshire | 453,560 | 735,240 | 590,965 | 450,000 | 625,000 |
| Fenland | 206,800 | 0 | 0 | 393,120 | 421,660 |
Cheshire
| |||||
| Congleton | 345,000 | 217,685 | 222,500 | 272,500 | 461,500 |
Cleveland
| |||||
| Stockton on Tees | 48,344 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Cornwall
| |||||
| Carrick | 0 | 72,460 | 86,520 | 12,800 | 12,940 |
| Kerrier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13,451 | 18,450 |
| Penwith | 0 | 0 | 99,306 | 113,442 | 114,000 |
| Restormel | 108,059 | 72,195 | 75,682 | 68,263 | 73,400 |
Cumbria
| |||||
| Barrow in Furness | 0 | 0 | 65,611 | 69,430 | 0 |
| South Lakeland | 8,561 | 267,541 | 503,862 | 730,462 | 546,500 |
Derbyshire
| |||||
Devon
| |||||
| East Devon | 0 | 89,556 | 101,036 | 200,568 | 202,470 |
| Exeter | 92,881 | 142,704 | 160,718 | 157,106 | 182,850 |
| North Devon | 0 | 79,879 | 90,737 | 139,020 | 95,470 |
| Plymouth | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79,590 | 125,770 |
| South Hams | 0 | 78,144 | 77,470 | 70,980 | 68,210 |
| Mid Devon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 332,600 |
| Torbay | 0 | 299,650 | 445,007 | 230,710 | 580,000 |
Dorset
| |||||
| Bournemouth | 200,970 | 798,642 | 174,770 | 350,000 | 400,000 |
| Christchurch | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30,000 | 50,000 |
| North Dorset | 29,177 | 4,796 | 738 | 1,890 | 1,500 |
| Poole | 0 | 0 | 499,705 | 610,769 | 133,805 |
| Purbeck | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64,400 | 50,000 |
| West Dorset | 0 | 0 | 100,000 | 200,000 | 210,000 |
| Wimborne | 105,027 | 85,842 | 80,247 | 109,378 | 119,290 |
Durham
| |||||
East Sussex
| |||||
| Brighton | 26,244 | 21,562 | 15,411 | 20,000 | 0 |
| Eastbourne | 48,841 | 227,926 | 230,339 | 262,250 | 0 |
| Hove | 39,420 | 88,606 | 87,080 | 115,497 | 124,335 |
| Lewes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150,000 |
| Rother | 0 | 0 | 5,921 | 53,000 | 0 |
Essex
| |||||
| Brentwood | 2,835 | 77,565 | 232,492 | 137,000 | 0 |
| Castle Point | 32,692 | 31,310 | 347,171 | 171,770 | 0 |
| Colchester | 533,857 | 548,596 | 850,960 | 1,163,280 | 1,153,000 |
| Epping Forest | 1,380,000 | 660,540 | 0 | 40,000 | 1,500,000 |
| Maldon | 0 | 0 | 100,000 | 120,000 | 100,000 |
| Rochford | 158,999 | 169,551 | 182,789 | 218,335 | 340,900 |
| Southend on Sea | 0 | 0 | 0 | 199,453 | 207,250 |
| Tendring | 118,255 | 194,748 | 0 | 44,174 | 40,540 |
| Thurrock | 0 | 158,095 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Gloucestershire
| |||||
| Cheltenham | 86,308 | 500,000 | 540,000 | 570,000 | 570,000 |
| Gloucester | 115,476 | 117,526 | 0 | 500,000 | 0 |
| Tewkesbury | 0 | 93,891 | 156,836 | 143,350 | 98,384 |
1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84
| 1984–85
| 1985–86
| |
Hampshire
| |||||
| Basingstoke and Deane | 613,032 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eastleigh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20,000 |
| Gosport | 106,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Havant | 468,249 | 0 | 312,893 | 391,203 | 399,200 |
| Portsmouth | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12,000 | 395,360 |
Hereford and Worcester
| |||||
| Hereford | 4,273 | 9,535 | 3,375 | 0 | 0 |
| Leominster | 0 | 0 | 181,586 | 0 | 0 |
| Redditch | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 115,430 |
| Worcester | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94,930 | 101,360 |
Hertfordshire
| |||||
| Broxbourne | 0 | 14,178 | 922,629 | 1,233,887 | 1,071,230 |
| Dacorum | 1,000,000 | 559,000 | 324,000 | 324,000 | 324,000 |
| East Hertfordshire | 272,765 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| North Hertfordshire | 400,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61,410 |
| Three Rivers | 219,830 | 130,376 | 162,979 | 167,638 | 202,550 |
| Welwyn Hatfield | 0 | 0 | 0 | 250,000 | 0 |
Humberside
| |||||
| Glanford | 8,365 | 25,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| North Wolds | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94,630 |
Isle of Wight
| |||||
| South Wight | 0 | 47,000 | 60,500 | 95,286 | 78,400 |
Kent
| |||||
| Ashford | 0 | 29,810 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Canterbury | 300,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dartford | 0 | 79,109 | 0 | 0 | 109,365 |
| Shepway | 0 | 50,000 | 50,000 | 52,300 | 70,000 |
| Tonbridge and Mailing | 861,330 | 861,330 | 900,000 | 850,000 | 850,000 |
| Tunbridge Wells | 0 | 80,999 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lancashire
| |||||
| Blackpool | 85,573 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hyndburn | 0 | 0 | 0 | 82,240 | 99,705 |
| Lancaster | 0 | 220,111 | 124,106 | 138,343 | 188,976 |
| Rossendale | 0 | 0 | 190,000 | 0 | 0 |
| West Lancashire | 0 | 20,000 | 200,000 | 122,235 | 266,430 |
Leicestershire
| |||||
| Charnwood | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 472,960 |
Harborough
| 53,000 | 63,000 | 68,000 | 97,672 | 71,500 |
| Hinckley and Bosworth | 0 | 298,633 | 82,429 | 69,044 | 51,421 |
| Melton | 0 | 0 | 350,000 | 215,000 | 251,000 |
| Oadby and Wigston | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30,000 | 100,000 |
| Rutland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100,000 | 100,000 |
Lincolnshire
| |||||
| Boston | 300,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lincoln | 240,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| South Holland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 182,579 |
| South Kesteven | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100,000 | 200,000 |
Norfolk
| |||||
| Breckland | 34,198 | 0 | 0 | 150,000 | 150,000 |
| North Norfolk | 28,015 | 0 | 0 | 111,770 | 0 |
| South Norfolk | 0 | 0 | 16,770 | 14,250 | 14,400 |
Northamptonshire
| |||||
| Northampton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87,690 |
| South Northampton | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 60,000 |
Northumberland
| |||||
| Castle Morpeth | 0 | 0 | 52,060 | 0 | 0 |
North Yorkshire
| |||||
| Hambleton | 0 | 0 | 63,271 | 76,461 | 76,740 |
| Harrogate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 258,000 |
| Ryedale | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85,000 | 85,000 |
| Scarborough | 0 | 0 | 116,495 | 151,551 | 132,270 |
Nottinghamshire
| |||||
| Mansfield | 0 | 343,103 | 249,991 | 0 | 0 |
1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84
| 1984–85
| 1985–86
| |
| Rushcliffe | 0 | 105,405 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Oxfordshire
| |||||
| Cherwell | 0 | 140,000 | 18,970 | 214,690 | 0 |
| South Oxfordshire | 448,015 | 506,884 | 736,011 | 1,234,799 | 1,203,300 |
| Vale of White Horse | 167,270 | 91,900 | 109,450 | 82,778 | 80,510 |
| West Oxfordshire | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,000,000 | 0 |
Salop
| |||||
| North Shropshire | 48,186 | 64,731 | 72,739 | 64,978 | 65,000 |
| Shrewsbury and Atcham | 149,525 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Somerset
| |||||
| Sedgemoor | 87,048 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| West Somerset | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,004 | 0 |
Staffordshire
| |||||
| East Staffordshire | 150,000 | 172,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lichfield | 114,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Newcastle under Lyme | 206,795 | 66,358 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Staffs. Moorlands | 850,000 | 600,000 | 450,000 | 450,000 | 0 |
Suffolk
| |||||
| Forest Heath | 47,935 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ipswich | 229,776 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Suffolk Coastal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100,000 |
Surrey
| |||||
| Elmbridge | 0 | 220,871 | 259,306 | 248,961 | 220,070 |
| Epsom and Ewell | 8,720 | 86,947 | 157,516 | 265,011 | 202,000 |
| Guildford | 154,902 | 0 | 150,000 | 0 | 50,000 |
| Reigate and Banstead | 0 | 0 | 26,387 | 521,989 | 9,000 |
| Runnymede | 46,021 | 81,011 | 125,602 | 274,536 | 322,(545 |
| Spelthorne | 109,000 | 410,683 | 443,000 | 116,590 | 0 |
| Surrey Heath | 247,250 | 79,090 | 484,885 | 452,116 | 93,440 |
| Tandridge | 0 | 499,430 | 499,430 | 999,430 | 999,430 |
| Waverley | 103,205 | 121,486 | 177,003 | 154,025 | 196,870 |
| Woking | 0 | 60,000 | 139,084 | 124,940 | 0 |
Warwickshire
| |||||
| Stratford-on-Avon | 835,260 | 88,000 | 176,320 | 27,793 | 30,800 |
West Sussex
| |||||
| Adur | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 120,435 |
| Arun | o | 0 | 0 | 50,000 | 100,000 |
| Chichester | 0 | 250,000 | 143,575 | 476,438 | 465,900 |
| Horsham | 253,900 | 605,506 | 298,840 | 0 | 0 |
| Mid Sussex | 17,500 | o | 200,124 | 19 174 | 19,137 |
| Worthing | 0 | 20,000 | 57,857 | 55,456 | 60,600 |
Wiltshire
| |||||
| West Wiltshire | 119,751 | 130,769 | 162,955 | 210,480 | 209,412 |
Property Services Agency (Berkshire)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the current acreage and location of sites and properties in Berkshire at the disposal of or administered by the Property Services Agency.
The information requested is as follows:
| Address | Acreage (Hectares) | ALA (M2) |
| Crown | ||
| Reading | ||
| Crown Buildings, Coley park | 8·620 | 11,050 |
| Bennett Road | 0·200 | 33 |
| 35 Ardler Road | 0·910 | 58 |
| South Street | 0·121 | 522 |
| Newbury | ||
| Land Adjoining Eastfield | 0·200 | 300 |
Address
| Acreage (Hectares)
| ALA (M2)
|
| Reading | ||
| Land for Skill Centre | 1·720 | 5,410 |
| Artillery House | 0·635 | 2,386 |
| Bradfield | ||
| UKWMO | 0·031 | 11 |
| Newbury | ||
| UKWMO | 0·030 | 11 |
| Streatley | ||
| UKWMO | 0·030 | 11 |
| Statfield Targis | ||
| UKWMO | 0·030 | 11 |
Newbury
| ||
| Reception Centre | 0·730 | 1,225 |
| HGVTS Turnpike Lane, Shaw | 1·246 | 2,524 |
Address
| Acreage (Hectares)
| ALA (M2)
|
| 33 Chandros Road | 0·070 | 80 |
| Reading | ||
| Met Office Training School | 20·581 | 10,333 |
| Donnington | ||
| Donnington Castle | 2·158 | |
| Slough | ||
| MSC Skill Centre | 5·900 | |
| Sub District Works Office (ACO) | 73 | |
Holdings from other Government Departments (MOD)
| ||
| Hermitage | ||
| PSA Works Office SMS | 254 | |
| Arborfield | ||
| District Works Office | 638 | |
Leased
| ||
| Slough | ||
| Upton Lodge | 2,504 | |
| 64 Stoke Road | 112 | |
| Chalfont House 1st Floor | 483 | |
| Prudential Buildings | 397 | |
| 72 High Street | 307 | |
| 172-177 Buckingham Avenue | 0·911 | 4,314 |
| Windsor Road Slough | 680 | |
| Garth House | 279 | |
| Bracknell | ||
| Fitzwilliam House | 1,800 | |
| 29 Charles Square | 365 | |
| Western Road | 0·702 | 3,929 |
| Maidenhead | ||
| Marlow House | 705 | |
| Thames House | 2,328 | |
| 3 Park Street | 1,111 | |
| Wokingham | ||
| 13 Peach Street | 100 | |
| 37 Broad Street | 124 | |
| Reading | ||
| Reading Bridge House | 2,149 | |
| Fountain House Butts Centre | 6,012 | |
| 79–81 Basingstoke Road | 694 | |
| BSM (Ground and 1st Floor) | 1,107 | |
| Market Place House | 4,540 | |
| 1 Station Road 22 Friar Street | 517 | |
| Sun Alliance House 60 Oxford Road | 449 | |
| 30–31 Friar Street | 360 | |
| 76 School Road Tilehurst | 70 | |
| Bam and 2 Garages | 206 | |
| Wessex House | 1,699 | |
| Terrapin Building | 298 | |
| Atlas House Silver Street | 787 | |
| Scottish Life House | 430 | |
| Premier House | 1,451 | |
| 20 The Butts Centre | 136 | |
| 21–23 Valpy Street—1–12 Beaconsfield Buildings | 3,723 | |
| Quebec House, 3 Silver Street | 714 | |
| 161–163 Friar Street | 2,205 | |
| 47–57 Queens Road | 5,613 | |
| 26–30 Kings Road | 1,915 | |
| City wall House 26–30 West Street | 1,161 | |
| Abbey Hall, Kings Road | 639 | |
| 10 Friars Walk | 2,690 | |
| Monarch House, 77–79 Caversham Road | 731 | |
| Units A-F The Butts Centre | 686 | |
| Slough | ||
| 24 Farnham Road | 0·327 | 395 |
Address
| Acreage (Hectares)
| ALA (M2)
|
| Crown Building 2 Farnham Road | 0·89 | 3·292 |
| Hurworth House London Road | 4·650 | 8·699 |
| Newbury | ||
| 15 Kings Road West | 63 | |
| Bracknell | ||
| London road | 0·204 | 15·604 |
| Met Office Eastern Road | 1·399 | 5,477 |
| Met Office East Hampstead | 33·259 | 3,381 |
| Crowthorne | ||
| TRRL Crowthorne | 103·765 | 43,080 |
| Sunningdale | ||
| Sunningdale Park | 42·177 | 10,020 |
Holdings from other Government Departments
| ||
| Bracknell | 42 | |
| Sub District Works Office PSA | ||
| Broadmoor | ||
| Sub District Works Office PSA | 531 | |
| Reading | ||
| Sub Depot PSA | 1,787 | |
| Thatcham | ||
| Sub Depot PSA | 43 | |
| Newbury | ||
| 22 Oxford Street Cromwell House | 622 | |
| 1–3 The Broadway | 407 | |
| Elizabeth House 41 West Street | 1,335 | |
| Hillview House West Street | 1,503 | |
| County Court Offices Kings Road | 141 | |
| Reading | ||
| 10 Cremyll Road | 961 | |
| New Warehouse | 1,640 | |
| 8A St. Mary's Butts | 157 | |
| Heron House 41–45 Queens Road | 7,282 | |
| Old Shire Hall The Forbury | 762 | |
| Balmore House | 961 | |
| Windsor | ||
| Crown House Victoria Street | 991 | |
| Shinfield Cattle Breeding Centre | 1·363 | 672 |
MOD held for disposal
| ||
| The Meadows Sandhurst | 76·290 (acres) | |
| Maywood Avenue White Waltham Maidenhead (39 Houses) | 5·480 (acres) | |
| Whitley Wood Reading (12 Houses) | 2·992 (acres) | |
| 60 Houses at various locations in Newbury Thatcham and Reading |
Grant-Related Expenditure
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish a table showing (a) grant-related expenditure per head (b) actual expenditure per head in 1985–86, (c) proposed block grant per head in 1986–87 and (d) the difference in block grant per head proposed compared with 1985–86 in the 10 shire metropolitan or London authorities with (i) the highest and (ii) the lowest grant-related expenditure per head proposed for 1986–87.
The available information is shown in the following table: the amount of grant to be paid in 1986–87 will depend on authorites own spending decision.
GRE head* 1986–87 settlement £
| Expenditure per head* 1985–86 2nd Supplementary Report £
| Grant per ÷ 1985–86 2nd Supplementary Report £
| |
Highest GRE per head
| |||
| City of London | 4,369·25 | 10,703·85 | –8,653·72 |
| Isles of Scilly | 761·50 | 645·62 | 377·92 |
| Newham | 674·25 | 628·06 | 299·34 |
| Tower Hamlets | 662·19 | 448·35 | 169·23 |
| Haringey | 632·54 | 664·62 | 214·38 |
| Brent | 603·32 | 584·08 | 179·32 |
| Manchester | 576·83 | 548·16 | 203·22 |
| Islington | 570·89 | 526·88 | 172·75 |
| Hackney | 566·49 | 522·70 | 256·80 |
| Camden | 542·50 | 670·14 | 80·26 |
Lowest GRE per head
| |||
| Wandsworth | 364·66 | 247·72 | 209·00 |
| Hertfordshire | 364·42 | 342·51 | 59·65 |
| Avon | 362·91 | 349·47 | 97·72 |
| Suffolk | 357·77 | 322·92 | 120·30 |
| Dorset | 352·63 | 310·51 | 95·53 |
| East Sussex | 352·43 | 306·86 | 82·49 |
| West Sussex | 347·38 | 298·21 | 77·06 |
| Oxfordshire | 337·78 | 317·04 | 70·35 |
| Surrey | 333·39 | 307·42 | 32·72 |
| Greenwich | 316·58 | 308·36 | 167·11 |
Footnotes:
* Comparisons of GRE and expenditure per head between different classes of authorities are misleading because functions differ between classes.
òIncludes payments to and receipts from the London Resource Equalisation Scheme.
Council House Sales
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make it his policy to refuse permission to local authorities seeking powers to prevent home owners personalising their homes.
As reflected in the provisions of the town and country planning general development order, our policy is that many types of alteration to the appearance of dwellings do not need to be subject to specific planning control.
Water Catchment Areas (Sales)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what representations he has received critical of his proposal that regional water authorities should offer for sale water catchment areas; what steps he is taking to preserve for sport and recreational use such land holdings as would be affected; and if he will make a statement.
I have received representations from local authorities, and sport and recreation interests in the North West, mostly through hon. Members. I expect water authorities to consult sporting and recreational interests when considering the disposal of land in their catchment areas. I have commended to them some guidelines which show how such interests can be given due consideration.
Home Insulation Grants
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list those councils that have applied for supplementary grant under the 1985–86 home insulation grant programme; and what proportion of the £7 million allocated to the reserve programme has been distributed.
The information is as follows:
To date, the following local authorities have applied for additional allocations from the Home Insulation Scheme.
- Northern
- Langbaurgh
- Middlesbrough
- Stockton-on-Tees
- Tynedale
- Alnwick*
- Chester-le-Street
- Darlington
- Yorkshire and Humberside
- Beverley
- Cleethorpes
- East Yorkshire
- Glanford
- Holderness
- Scunthorpe
- Hambleton
- Scarborough
- Selby
- Barnsley
- Doncaster
- Sheffield*
- Bradford
- Calderdale*
- Kirklees*
- Wakefield
- Kingston upon Hull
- Craven
- Harrogate
- Ryedale York
- East Midlands
- Amber Valley
- Erewash*
- North-East Derbyshire
- West Derbyshir
- Blaby
- Charnwood
- Melton
- North West Leicestershire
- Oadby and Wigston
- North Kesteven
- West Lindsey Corby
- Kettering
- Northampton
- Wellingborough
- Ashfield
- Bassetlaw
- Broxstowe
- Gedling
- Mansfield
- Newark
- Nottingham
- South Northamptonshire
- Bolsover
- Chesterfield
- Derby
- High Peak
- Harborough*
- Rutland
- Boston
- East Lindsey*
- South Kesteven
- Daventry
- East Northamptonshire
- Rushcliffe
- Eastern
- Luton
- North Bedfordshire
- South Bedfordshire
- Mid Bedfordshire
- Chiltern
- South Buckinghamshire
- Wycombe*
- Fenland
- Basildon
- Brentwood
- Castle Point
- Colchester
- Harlow
- Maldon
- Southend on Sea
- Tendring
- Uttlesford
- Broxbourne
- Dacorum
- St. Albans
- Stevenage
- Welwyn Hatfield
- Breckland
- Broadland
- Great Yarmouth
- Norwich
- South Norfolk
- Babergh*
- Forest Heath
- Ipswich
- Mid Suffolk
- St. Edmundsbury
- Suffolk Coastal
- Waveney
- North Hertfordshire
- Aylesbury Vale
- Huntingdon
- Chelmsford
- Thurrock
- Hertsmere
- North Norfolk*
- Greater London
- Bromley
- Ealing
- Havering
- Lambeth
- Redbridge
- Brent
- South Eastern
- Bracknell
- Windsor and Maidenhead
- Wokingham
- Eastbourne
- Rother
- Wealden
- Basingstoke and Deane
- East Hampshire
- Eastleigh
- Fareham
- Havant
- New Forest
- South Eastern
- Southampton
- Test Valley
- Winchester
- Medina
- Ashford
- Canterbury
- Dartford
- Dover*
- Gillingham
- Maidstone
- Sevenoaks
- Thanet
- Tunbridge Wells
- South Oxfordshire
- Vale of White Horse
- West Oxfordshire*
- Elmbridge
- Epsom and Ewell
- Guildford
- Mole Valley*
- Reigate and Banstead
- Runnymede
- Spelthorne
- Surrey Heath
- Waverley
- Woking
- Adur
- Arun
- Chichester
- Horsham
- Mid-Sussex
- Worthing
- Lewes
- Portsmouth
- South Wight
- Tonbridge and Mailing
- Tendridge Hove*
- South West
- Woodspring
- Carrick*
- Mid Devon
- North Devon
- Torridge
- Christchurch
- North Dorset
- Poole
- West Dorset
- Wimborne
- Stroud*
- Taunton Deane
- Kennet
- Wansdyke
- Caradon
- Kerrier
- East Devon
- South Hams*
- Bournemouth*
- Thamesdown
- West Midlands
- Bromsgrove
- Hereford
- Leominster
- Malvern Hills
- Redditch
- Worcester
- West Midlands
- Wychavon
- Wyre Forest
- Bridgnorth
- Shrewsbury and Atcham
- South Shropshire
- The Wrekin
- Cannock Chase*
- Lichfield
- Newcastle under Lyme
- South Staffordshire
- Nuneaton and Bedworth
- Stratford on Avon*
- Warwick
- Coventry*
- Dudley
- Sandwell*
- North Shropshire
- East Staffordshire
- Stafford
- Tamworth
- North Warwickshire
- Rugby
- North West
- Congleton
- Crewe and Nantwich
- Ellesmere Port and Neston
- Halton
- Warrington
- South Lakeland
- Fylde*
- Hyndburn
- Rossendale*
- Wyre
- Bolton
- Rochdale
- Bury*
- Salford*
- Wigan
- Sefton
- Macclesfield
- St. Helens
- Wirral
- Oldham
* These authorities have not received any additional allocation as a result of applications they have made. They have however been invited to re-apply when it is clearer that their existing allocations will soon be exhausted.
Some 83 per cent. of the reserve has been allocated.
Background note
Mr. Speller asked an identical question in June 1985 (PQ 2824/84/86) and this draft answer simply updates the information previously provided in reply.
Service Charges
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he expects to complete consideration of the Nugee report; and if he will introduce legislation on the subject of service charges at an early date.
My right hon. Friend and I are still considering the many recommendations in the Nugee report in consultation with colleagues in other Departments which have an interest. I will make a statement as soon as possible, but I cannot say at this stage when it will be possible to introduce legislation on this subject.
Merseyside Residuary Body
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he is satisfied with the progress being made by the Merseyside Residuary Body; and if he will make a statement;(2) why he dismissed Mr. Leslie Pocock as chairman of the Merseyside Residuary Body.
I shall answer these quesions shortly.
Local Government Reform
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish a table of the latest estimate of financial gains or losses likely to be incurred by each London borough arising out of the abolition of the Greater London council; and if he will make a statement.
Savings following the abolition of the GLC will depend on decisions by each of the successors.
London Residuary Body (Interim Budget)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will issue to all hon. Members in London the interim budget statement for 1986–87 of the London Residuary Body; if he will publish in the Official Report the impact on each London borough of the interim budget; and if he will make a statement.
No. The London Residuary Body is continuing to modify its budget in the light of discussion with boroughs and others directly concerned.
Mary Rose
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will list, by subsection and paragraph, the powers under which he acted in providing funds towards the cost of recovering the Mary Rose:
The grant offered by my predecessor to the Mary Rose trust was within the powers of section 24(2) of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 which enables contributions to be made towards the cost of removing ancient monuments to another place for the purposes of preservation. Section 61(12) defines an "ancient monument" as either a scheduled monument (section I of the 1979 Act) or "any other monument which in the opinion of the Secretary of State is of public interest by reason of the historic, architectural, traditional, artistic or archaeological interest attaching to it". The Mary Rose fell within the definition of "monument" in section 61(7)(a) and the exclusion in section 61(8)(b) concerning protected wrecks does not apply to this subsection. The Mary Rose was clearly of public interest and a grant could thus lawfully be made. This conclusion was reached before the grant was offered; payments were not made until 1982. No protected wrecks have been scheduled.The responsibility for making grants was transferred to the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission on 1 April 1984 and the present policy on aid to private charities is a matter for the Commission.
Local Government Bill
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what discussions he has had with the Audit Commission about the implementation of part 2 of the Local Government Bill.
Informal discussions about the Local Government Bill were held between officers of my Department and the Audit Commission last December.
Docklands Light Railway
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the total number of local people currently employed on the construction of the Docklands light railway.
[pursuant to his reply, 18 November 1985, c. 61]: The number of people currently employed on the construction of the London Docklands railway at December 1985, based on postal areas, is shown in the table:
| Postal Area | Numbers Employed |
| London East | 232 |
| London South East | 14 |
| London South West | 6 |
| London West | 13 |
| London North | 31 |
| London North West | 38 |
| Home Counties | 69 |
| Elsewhere | 37 |
| Total | 440 |
Water Authorities
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the organisations which commented on the document titled "Water Privatisation A Discussion Paper", indicating which supported privatisation and which opposed it.
[pursuant to his reply, 15 January 1986, c. 573]: Responses have been received from the following:
- The Water Authorities Association
- Anglian Water Authority
- North West Water Authority
- Northumbrian Water Authority
- Severn Trent Water Authority
- South West Water Authority
- Southern Water Authority
- Thames Water Authority
- Welsh Water Authority
- Wessex Water Authority
| 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | 1984–85 | 1985–86 to date | |
| Agriculture | 6 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | — |
| Defence | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Education | 39 | 0 | 46 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Employment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Energy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Environment | 8 | 131 | 20 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Foreign Affairs | 31 | 13 | 50 | 0 | 24 | 12 | 0 |
| Home Affairs | 15 | 12 | 15 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Scottish Affairs | 8 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 93 | 72 | 0 |
| Social Services | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trade and Industry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Transport | 0 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 55 | 49 | 0 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 2 | 22 | 18 | *6 | 6 | 37 | 3 |
| Welsh Affairs | 0 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 7 | 3 |
| * This figure does not include 69 divisions on a report which was not in the event made to the House. | |||||||
- Yorkshire Water Authority
- The Water Companies Association
- British Water Industries Group
- National Joint Industrial Committee for the Water Industry (Trade Union Side)
- Institute of Water Engineers and Scientists
- British Effluent and Water Association
- Association of Chief Technical Officers
- Association of Consulting Engineers
- Association of District Councils
- Association of Metropolitan District Engineers
- Basildon Council
- Camden District Council
- Confederation of British Industry
- Countryside Commission
- Deloitte Haskins and Sells
- Food Manufacturers Federation
- Institute of Directors
- John Laing Construction Ltd/Société Lyonnaise des Eaux
- London Boroughs Association
- London Borough of Merton
- Metropolitan Borough of Knowsley
- National Anglers Council
- National Consumer Council
- National Farmers Union
- Salmon and Trout Association
- South Derbyshire District Council
- Southern Water Retirement Association
- Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council
- United Kingdom Petroleum Industry Association Ltd.
- Environmental Group
In addition, responses have been received from four private individuals.
Of the total of 43 responses, seven supported the principle of privatisation and eleven opposed it. The remaining 25 commented on practical issues, without expressing a view on the merits of privatisation itself.
House Of Commons
Select Committees
asked the Lord Privy Seal how many Divisions have taken place in each Session on reports for each departmental Select Committee; and how many reports have been approved unanimously, for each year since their appointment.
The number of divisions which have taken place on reports for each departmental Select Committee in each Session is as follows:
1979–80
| 1980–81
| 1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84
| 1984–85
| 1985–86 to date
| |
| Agriculture | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
| Defence | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 1 |
| Education | 4 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Employment | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Energy | 2 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 0 |
| Environment | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| Foreign Affairs | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 |
| Home Affairs | 4 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Scottish Affairs | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Social Services | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0 |
| Trade and Industry | 4 | 9 | 16 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 2 |
| Transport | 3 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 0 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 2 |
| Welsh Affairs | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
asked the Lord Privy Seal what is the percentage attendance rate and percentage turnover of members of each departmental Select Committee and their Sub-Committees for each Session since their appointment;
| 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | 1984–85 | |
| Agriculture | 84 | 77 | 75 | 72 | 68 | 62 |
| Defence | 72 | 72 | 75 | 73 | 69 | 74 |
| Education | 71 | 68 | 72 | 63 | 76 | 68 |
| Employment | 74 | 69 | 70 | 70 | 81 | 82 |
| Energy | 72 | 73 | 53 | 63 | 73 | 67 |
| Environment | 69 | 67 | 68 | 68 | 76 | 64 |
| Foreign Affairs | 87 | 69 | 84 | 78 | 66 | 75 |
| Sub-Committee Overseas Develpment* | 45 | 75 | 84 | 83 | — | — |
| Home Affairs | 92 | 84 | 75 | 73 | 82 | 75 |
| Sub-Committee Race Relations and Immigration | 89 | 89 | 87 | 92 | 83 | 80 |
| Scottish Affairs | 85 | 78 | 74 | 71 | 72 | 67 |
| Social Services | 73 | 66 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 66 |
| Trade and Industry | 84 | 81 | 71 | 67 | 63 | 57 |
| Transport | 73 | 69 | 74 | 65 | 73 | 67 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 92 | 88 | 85 | 85 | 77 | 78 |
| Sub-Committee | 75 | 73 | 61 | 71 | 79 | 92 |
| Welsh Affairs | 81 | 75 | 76 | 79 | 83 | 80 |
Note:
* Where a Member ceases to be able to attend a Committee, but until his replacement technically remains a Member, the above attendances are thereby depressed.
The turnover percentages for each departmental Select Committee and their Sub-Committees for each Session since their appointment are:
1979–80
| 1980–81
| 1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84
| 1984–85
| 1985–86 to date
| |
| Agriculture | 0 | 33 | 11 | 0 | 18 | 9 | é18 |
| Defence | 0 | 9 | 27 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Education | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 18 | 0 |
| Employment | 0 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Energy | 9 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 0 | 27 | 9 |
| Environment | 18 | 18 | 64 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 0 |
| Foreign Affairs | 0 | 18 | 18 | 36 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Committee on Overseas Development* | 25 | 17 | 33 | 40 | — | — | — |
| Home Affairs | 0 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 |
| Sub-Committee on Race | |||||||
| Relations and Immigration | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 |
| Scottish Affairs | 0 | 30 | 25 | 15 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| Social Services | 11 | 22 | 11 | 22 | 0 | 27 | é18 |
| Trade and Industry | 0 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 27 | 9 | 0 |
what is the overall attendance rate; and what is the total number of members who have served on each Select Committee.
The attendance percentages for each departmental Select Committee and their Sub-Committees for each Session since their appointment are as follows:
| 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | 1984–85 | 1985–86 to date | |
| Transport | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 0 | 18 | 27 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Sub-Committee | 14 | 14 | 57 | 0 | * | * | * |
| Welsh Affairs | 12 | 0 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
members who have served on each Committee are:
| Overall Attendance | Number of Members | |
| Agriculture | 73 | 25 |
| Defence | 72·5 | 17 |
| Education | 71·5 | 22 |
| Employment | 74 | 23 |
| Energy | 66·1 | 27 |
| Environment | 69·2 | 26 |
| Foreign Affairs | 74 | 24 |
| Sub-Committee Overseas Development | 72 | 16 |
| Home Affairs | 80 | 28 |
| Sub-Committee Race Relations and Immigration | 80 | 12 |
| Scottish Affairs | 74·5 | 27 |
| Social Services | 69·8 | 24 |
| Trade and Industry | 70 | 24 |
| Transport | 70 | 19 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 81 | 22 |
| Sub Committee | 76 | 16 |
| Welsh Affairs | 79 | 23 |
asked the Lord Privy Seal which reports of departmental Select Committee and their subcommittees, where appropriate, have been debated; when they were debated; what percentage of the total number of reports this represents; and which reports have been mentioned on the Order Paper as relevant to debate.
Information requested is as follows: The following reports of departmental Select Committees and their Sub-Committees have been debated on substantive motions:
Second Report (1979–80) from the Home Affairs Committee on 'Race Relations and the 'Sus' law' debated 5 June 1980. Second Report (1979–80) from the Social Services Committee on 'Perinatal and Neonatal Mortality' debated 5 December 1980.
Fourth Report (1980–81) from the Social Services Committee on 'Medical Education' debated 18 June 1982.
Fifth Report (1984–85) from the Employment Committee on 'Wages Councils' debated 6 June 1985.
This represents 0·9 per cent. of the total number of reports.
The following reports have been mentioned on the Order Paper as relevant to debate:
Agriculture
First Report (1980–81) on 'Animal Welfare in the Poultry, Pig and Veal Calf Industries' debated 19 November 1982.
Defence
Second Report (1979–80) on 'Statement on the Defence Estimates 1980' debated 28 and 29 April 1980.
Second Report (1980–81) on 'Statement on the Defence Estimates 1981' debated 19 and 20 May 1981.
First Report (1983–84) on 'Statement on the Defence Estimates 1984' debated 18 and 19 June 1984.
Third Report (1983–83) on 'Ministry of Defence Reorganisation' debated 22 October 1984.
First Report (1984–85) on 'The Use of Merchant Shipping for Defence Purposes' debated 12 and 13 June 1985.
Third Report (1984–85) on 'Defence Commitments and Resources and the Defence Estimates 1985–86' debated 12 and 13 June 1985.
Education
Eighth Report (1981–82) on "Public and Private Funding of the Arts" debated 14 June 1984.
First Report (1982–83) on "Prison Education" debated 4 July 1984.
Second Report (1983–84) on "Observation on the Government Reply to the First Report of the Education, Science and Arts Committee 1982–83" debated on 4 July 1984.
Employment
First Report (1983–84) on "GCHQ" debated 27 February 1984.
Energy
Second Report (1983–84) on "Department of Energy Supplementary Estimate in Respect of the Coal Industry" debated 8 March 1984.
Fourth Report (1984–85) on "Department of Energy Winter Supplementary Estimate in respect of the British National Oil Corporation" debated 18 December 1984.
Fifth Report (1984–85) on "Government Oil Price Policy and the Department of Energy Spring Supplementary Estimate in respect of the British National Oil Corporation" debated 14 March 1985.
Environment
Second Report (1983–84) on "Department of the Environment Main Estimates 1984–85" debated 4 July 1984.
Third Report (1983–84) on "Property Services Agency Main Estimates 1984–85" debated 17 July 1984.
Fourth Report (1983–84) on "Acid Rain" debated 11 January 1985.
Third Report (1984–85) on "Department of the Environment Main Estimates 1985–86" debated 11 July 1985.
Fourth Report (1984–85) on "Property Services Agency Main Estimates 1985–86" debated 11 July 1985.
Foreign Affairs
Fifth Report (1980–81) on "Mexico Summit: the British Role in the light of the Brandt Commission" debated 24 July 1981.
First Report (1980–81) on "British North American Acts: Role of Parliament" debated 17 February 1982.
Second Report (1980–81) on "British North America Acts: Role of Parliament" debated 17 February 1982.
First Report (1981–82) (1980–81) on "British North America Acts: Role of Parliament" debated 17 February 1982.
Second Report (1982–83) on "Turks and Caicos Islands: Airport Development on Providenciales" debated 14 March 1983.
Second Report (1983–84) on "Grenada" debated 17 July 1984.
Fourth Report (1984–85) on "FCO/ODA Estimates 1984–85" debated 17 July 1984.
Fifth Report (1983–84) on "Falkland Islands" debated 14 March 1985.
Fifth Report (1984–85) on "United Kingdom Membership of UNESCO" debated 22 November 1985.
Second Report (1984–85) on "Famine in Africa" debated 17 December 1985.
First Report (1985–86) on "Winter Supplementary Estimates 1985–86" debated 17 December 1985.
Social Services
Third Report (1981–82) on "Age of Retirement" debated 25 November 1983.
First Report (1983–84) on "Griffiths NHS Management Enquiry Report" debated 4 May 1984.
Second Report (1984–85) on "Community Care" debated 11 July 1985.
Trade and Industry
Third Report (1984–85) on "Trade with China" debated 18 July 1985.
Transport
First Report (1984–85) on "Road Safety" debated 15 November 1985.
First Report (1985–86) on "The Channel Link" debated 9 December 1985.
Treasury and Civil Service
Second Report (1979–80) on "The Budget and the Government's Expenditure Plans 1980–81 to 1983–84" debated 7 May 1980.
Fifth Report (1980–81) on "The 1981 Budget and the Government's Expenditure Plans 1981–82 to 1983–84" debated 9 April 1981.
Third Report (1981–82) on "Efficiency and Effectiveness in the Civil Service" debated on 28 October 1983.
Fourth Report (1981–82) on "The 1982 Budget" debated 6 April 1982.
Fifth Report (1981–82) on "The Government's Expenditure Plans 1982–83 to 1984–85" debated 21 April 1982.
Second Report (1982–83) on "The Spring Supplementary Estimates" debated 14 March 1983.
Third Report (1982–83) on "The Government's Expenditure Plans 1983–84 to 1985–86" debated 9 March 1983.
| 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | Total | |
| Agriculture | 0 | 19 | 16 | 14 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 94 |
| Defence | 0 | 29 | 20 | 26 | 17 | 34 | 24 | 150 |
| Education | 0 | 20 | 40 | 30 | 14 | 22 | 21 | 147 |
| Employment | 0 | 22 | 27 | 23 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 120 |
| Energy | 0 | 16 | 23 | 19 | 14 | 17 | 25 | 114 |
| Environment | 0 | 11 | 4 | 14 | 14 | 30 | 29 | 107 |
| Foreign Affairs | 1 | 22 | 15 | 22 | 9 | 29 | 30 | 128 |
| Sub-Committee Overseas Development | 0 | 16 | 13 | 13 | 5 | — | — | 47 |
| Home Affairs | 2 | 16 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 16 | 10 | 77 |
| Sub-Committee Race Relations and Immigration | 2 | 26 | 20 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 11 | 97 |
| Scottish Affairs | 1 | 18 | 17 | 19 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 94 |
| Social Services | 0 | 19 | 38 | 23 | 19 | 29 | 17 | 145 |
| Trade and Industry | 0 | 26 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 23 | 25 | 119 |
| Transport | 0 | 30 | 25 | 18 | 16 | 30 | 28 | 147 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 1 | 22 | 14 | 25 | 11 | 18 | 22 | 113 |
| Sub-Committee | 0 | 11 | 13 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 12 | 64 |
| Welsh Affairs | 0 | 27 | 26 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 9 | 105 |
asked the Lord Privy Seal if he will list the occupations at appointment of specialist advisers who have assisted the various departmental Select Committees since their appointment, together with the number in each occupation.
The information is as follows:
| Number | |
| Academics | 120 |
| Consultants | 18 |
| Journalists | 3 |
| Headmasters | 2 |
| Businessmen | 3 |
| Arts Administrators | 2 |
| Retired Civil Servants | 18 |
| Retired LEA Inspector | 1 |
Fourth Report (1982–83) on "International Monetary Arrangements: International Lending by Banks" debated 18 April 1983.
Fifth Report (1982–83) on "The 1983 Budget" debated 14 April 1983.
First Report (1983–84) on "The Government's Economic Policy: Autumn Statement" debated 6 March 1984.
Third Report (1983–84) on "The Government's Expenditure Plans 1984–85 to 1986–87" debated 6 March 1984.
Fourth Report (1983–84) on "The 1984 Budget" debated 10 April 1984.
Seventh Report (1983–84) on "The Fontainebleau Summit Agreement" debated 10 July 1984.
First Report (1984–85) on "The Government's Economic Policy: Autumn Statement" debated 6 December 1984.
Third Report (1984–85) on "Special Supplementary Estimates Class II, Vote 10 (Budget of the European Community)' debated 22 January 1985.
Sixth Report (1984–85) on "The Government's Expenditure Plans 1985–86 to 1987–88" debated 4 March 1985.
Eighth Report (1984–85) on "The 1985 Budget" debated 29 April 1985.
Second Report (1985–86) on "The Government's Economic Policy: Autumn Statement" debated on 12 December 1985.
asked the Lord Privy Seal what is the number of formal evidence sessions for each of the departmental Select Committees for each year since their establishment, together with the total figure for 1979 to 1985; and if he will give similar data for Sub-Committees since their appointment.
The following table shows the number of formal evidence sessions held by each departmental Select Committee and their Sub-Committees, with a total for the years 1979–85:
| Number | |
| Retired College Principal | 1 |
| Education Officer | 1 |
| Retired Her Majesty's Inspector | 1 |
| Director of Administration (London Zoo) | 1 |
| Consulting Engineers | 6 |
| Retired | 2 |
| Authors | 2 |
| Non-Government Organisation | 2 |
| Buildings Officer | 1 |
| Doctor | 1 |
| Regional Nursing Officer | 1 |
| Solicitor | 1 |
| Director of Social Services | 1 |
| Social Scientists | 4 |
| Accountants | 4 |
| Economists | 22 |
| Adviser on GEEC Affairs | 1 |
Number
| |
| Director CIPFA | 1 |
| Director NIESR | 1 |
| Director of Studies RIIA | 1 |
| Local Government Officer | 1 |
| Director-General RIPA | 1 |
| Research Analyst | 1 |
| Administrative Sub-Dean | 1 |
| Administrator | 1 |
| Other | 5 |
asked the Lord Privy Seal if he will name the advisers appointed by each Select Committee since their appointment; what was the total cost of (a)remuneration and (b) expenses to each Select Committee of advisers for each Session; and if he will indicate those advisers who are currently appointed to advise each committee.
The information requested is given in the following tables.The following people have been appointed as specialist advisers by the departmental Select Committees since their establishment. Those advisers currently appointed are indicated with an asterisk.
- Agriculture
- Professor J. Ashton.
- Professor D. K. Britten.
- Mr. E. Neville-Rolfe.*
- Professor C. R. W. Spedding.
- Professor A. J. F. Webster.
- Mr. I. Sturgess.
- Defence
- Mrs. Valerie Adams.*
- Colonel Jonathan Alford.*
- Air Vice Marshal Anthony Caillard, CB.*
- Professor Lawrence Freedman.*
- Rear Admiral E. F. Gueritz, CB, CBE, DSC.*
- Air Vice Marshal R. Harding.
- Dr. Keith Hartley.*
- Brigadier K. Hunt.
- Mr. S. Jenkins.
- Major General Patrick Kay.
- Sir Peter Matthews.
- Major General Sir Jeremy Moore, KCB, OBE, MC.*
- Mr. Chapman Pincher.
- Mr. Anthony Preston.
- Mr. Keith Thomas.
Education
Mr. M. Lightfoot, *Mr. J. Myerscough, Professor W. Brammer, Mr. B. Hanson, Dr. J. Crichton Campbell, Mr. A. Travers, Mr. A. C. Morris, Mr. M. Shattock, *Mr. S. Heaven, Dr. J. F. Harbinson, Dr. S. Worrall, Mr. P. Shea, Mr. J. Dawson, Professor Vickery, Mr. C. Rainbow, Dr. P. Andrews, Mr. P. Mann, Mr. A. Garrett, Mr. D. Dougan, Dr. C. Andrew, Professor R. Floud, *Mr. N. Thomas.
Employment
Mike Hanson, Roy Lewis, Dr. Charles Hanson, Paul McCormick, Hubert Scholes, Dr. Keith Ewing, Ian Hudson, Professor Bryan Harvey, Gilmour Warnock, *Professor Charles Handy, Frank Wilkinson, Roger Tarling, Andrew Likierman, *Professor Richard Layard and *Professor David Metcalf.
Energy
Professor D. Burn, *Mr. J. Chesshire, Mr. H. Gott, Dr. N. Dombey, *Professor A. Kemp, *Professor G. Manners, *Professor W. Murgatroyd, *Professor P. O'Sullivan, *Mr. W. Orchard, *Professor J. Surrey and *Mr. S. Lumby.
Environment
Mr. V. Watts: Senior Partner in Arthur Anderson & Co., Mr. J. Stevenson: Director of Economic Affairs, National Federation of Building Trades Employers,
Mr. A. Murie: Academic, University of Bristol,
Mr. D. Webster: Principal Scientific Officer, Centre for Environmental Studies,
Mr. A. Bovaird: Lecturer in Economics, University of Aston in Birmingham,
Dr. Christine Whitehead: Lecturer in Economics, London School of Economics,
Mr. M. Harloe: Academic, University of Essex,
*Dr. Ken Young: Academic, Policy Studies Institute,
*Mr. A. J. Rosenfeld CB: Civil Servant (retired), Principal Finance Officer,
*Dr. J. N. Bell: Academic, Department of Botany, University of London,
*Professor A. Williams: Academic, Department of Fuel and Energy, Leeds University,
*Dr. J. Mather: Academic, Natural Environment Research Council (NERC),
*Mr. W. Patterson: Consultant and author on nuclear physics,
Mr. M. Grant: Academic, Southampton University.
Foreign Affairs
Mr. David Watt, *Mrs. Jocelyn Statler, Mrs. Carol Geldart, Dr. Karen Darwisha, Mrs. Nancy Crawshaw, Brigadier Frank Henn CBE, Dr. John Finnis, *Mr. E. G. White, Dr. George Hills, Dr. A. J. Payne, Dr. Colin Clarke, Dr. David Browning, Dr. Walter Little, Professor E. D. Brown, Professor Charles Elliott, Dr. Paul Howell, Mr. Anthony Bottrall, Mr. John Cathie, Mr. John Mitchell. Dr. Paul Mosley, Mr. J. D. Stephen, Dr. C. L. Colclough, Mr. Gordon Bridger, Sir Melvyn Rosser, Professor J. M. Hirst, Dr. N. Clark, Mr. Rupert Bristow, Mr. S. Jones, Mr. G. Hunter, Professor Rosalyn Higgins, *Sir Curtis Keeble, *Mr. Michael Kaser, *Mr. Phil Williams, *Mr. Richard Pollock.
Home Affairs
Dr. S. D. McConville, Dr. D. Williams.
Sub-Committee on Race Relations and Immigration Dr. D. Smith
Scottish Affairs
Professor T. Carbery, Dr. Tony Cockerill, Diane Dawson, Ian Falconer, David Heald, Professor L. Hunter, Jim Ross, *Charlotte Lythe, Professor D. Mackay, Tony Mackay, Malcolm Maclennan, Alan McGregor, John More
Social Services
Mr. K. Shuttleworth, Professor E. O. R. Reynolds, Professor R. Beard, Professor E. Alberman, Professor R. Klein, *Mr. M. O'Higgins, Professor T. Clark, Professor J. Parkhourse, Mr. N. Hendry, Mr. S. Engleman, Mr. M. Fogarty, Mr. H. Billing, Mrs. B. Kahan, Mrs. D. Rawstron, Mr. D. Allen, Professor J. Wing, Mr. D. Plank, Miss J. Young, Dr. M. Mitcheson, *Mr. R. Berthoud, *Mr. J. Kay, *Professor J. Bradshaw, *Professor J. Gunn, *Dr. J. MacKeith, *Professor R. Bluglass.
Trade & Industry
Mr. A. G. Thorne, Mr. J. M. Jamieson, Mr. J. J. B. Barrett, Mr. G. Firth, Mr. T. A. J. Cockerill and *Professor D. Garel Rhys.
Transport
Mr. C. D. Brown, Mr. A. Muir Wood (later Sir Alan Muir Wood), Mr. W. R. Shirrefs, Mr. A. Likierman, Dr. S. Glaister, Mr. A. Bull, Professor A. D. May, *Professor K. M. Gwilliam.
Treasury and Civil Service
Professor M. Artis, Professor A. B. Atkinson, Professor M. Beesley, Dr. D. Begg, Mr. A. J. C. Britton*, Dr. A. Budd, Professor W. Buiter, Mr. P. J. Butler, Mr. A. Doig, Mr. J. Ermisch*, Mr. J. E. Hansford, Mr. D. Heald, Professor D. Hendry, Mr. S. G. B. Henry, Mr. N. Hepworth, Mr. C. Johnson*, Mr. A. J. Jones, Mr. J. Kay, Mr. G. G. Leighton-Boyce, Mr. A. Likierman*, Mr. M. Marks, Mr. W. E. Martin*, Mr. R. Matthews, Professor M. Miller, Dr. P. Neild, Mr. P. Ormerod, Mrs. Hermione Parker, Mr. W. Plowden*, Mr. J. Redwood, Dr. W. Robinson*, Professor H. Rose, Mr. H. C. Salter, Mr. D. Savage*, Mr. S. Stewart, Mr. M. F. Stonefrost, Professor B. Tew, Mr. W. J. L. Wallace, Mr. T. Ward*, Professor J. Williamson.
Welsh Affairs
Mr. B. Moore, Mr. J. Rhodes, Mr. D. R. Thomas, Mr.
Special advisers—Fees and Expenses by Session
| ||||||||||||||
Committee
| 1979–80
| 1980–81
| 1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84
| 1984–85*
| 1985–86*
| |||||||
Fees
| Expenses
| Fees
| Expenses
| Fees
| Expenses
| Fees
| Expenses
| Fees
| Expenses
| Fees
| Expenses
| Fees
| Expenses
| |
£
| £
| £
| £
| £
| £
| £
| £
| £
| £
| £
| £
| £
| £
| |
| Agriculture | 4,330 | 3,883 | 2,820 | 929 | 2,800 | 963 | 1,750 | 386 | 1,282 | 463 | 1,640 | 882 | — | — |
| Defence | 3,387 | 321 | 6,667 | 628 | 10,069 | 942 | 7,147 | 938 | 10,007 | 1,111 | 10,429 | 1,172 | 830 | 109 |
| Education, Science and Arts | 8,594 | 3,269 | 10,302 | 2,951 | 16,916 | 3,052 | 10,212 | 1,644 | 2,988 | 54 | 3,453 | 84 | — | — |
| Employment | 2,198 | 357 | 5,607 | 1,185 | 2,783 | 199 | 1,054 | 437 | 1,560 | 106 | 4,398 | 60 | — | — |
| Energy | 6,696 | 648 | 11,926 | 2,593 | 13,531 | 3,109 | 5,900 | 1,075 | 7,829 | 1,262 | 11,343 | 3,636 | 1,026 | 53 |
| Environment | 10,950 | 1,322 | 6,611 | 1,415 | 6,563 | 1,030 | 3,589 | 79 | 3,832 | 184 | 4,952 | 280 | — | — |
| European Legislation | 1,480 | 62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Foreign Affairs | 8,582 | 2,713 | 17,430 | 2,402 | 17,987 | 3,733 | 10,512 | 3,522 | 2,295 | 130 | 2,548 | 586 | — | — |
| Home Affairs | 1,769 | 261 | 1,882 | 256 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| House of Commons (Services) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,050 | 446 | 200 | 27 | — | — |
| Computer Sub-committee | ||||||||||||||
| Industry and Trade | 3,355 | 961 | 6,187 | 2,041 | 6,660 | 2,653 | 3,350 | 1,589 | 2,499 | 1,311 | 3,960 | 1,773 | — | — |
| Scottish Affairs | 1,755 | 1,378 | 2,025 | 1,753 | 2,070 | 2,737 | 2,337 | 1,461 | 1,367 | 1,965 | 1,557 | 2,157 | — | — |
| Social Services | 9,442 | 1,813 | 14,936 | 12,296 | 4,704 | 1,104 | 4,669 | 828 | 4,671 | 623 | 4,002 | 349 | — | — |
| Sound Broadcasting | 800 | 125 | 495 | 129 | 2,000 | 288 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Transport | 1,975 | 700 | 4,635 | 6,4 | 4,920 | 479 | 1,860 | 355 | 400 | 66 | 2,680 | 1,237 | — | — |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 8,557 | 1,777 | 9,686 | 2,178 | 9,690 | 2,193 | 12,953 | 4,645 | 10,515 | 1,693 | 11,353 | 2,431 | 652 | 5 |
| Welsh Affairs | 2,652 | 969 | 300 | 23 | 3,430 | 1,175 | 3,358 | 1,346 | 4,031 | 1,758 | 4,616 | 1,104 | 522 | 141 |
| *The Accounts for 1984–85 and 1985–86 are not yet complete. | ||||||||||||||
asked the Lord Privy Seal how many memoranda have been submitted by Government Departments to Select Committees other than those appointed to examine their activities for each Session since their appointment.
| 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | 1984–85 | 1985–86 | |
| Agriculture | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Defence | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Education | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Employment | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Energy | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 0 |
| Environment | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 4 | — |
| Foreign Affairs | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 1 |
| Sub-Committee Overseas Development | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | — | — | — |
| Home Affairs | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Sub-Committee Race | |||||||
| Relations and Immigration | 0 | 14 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 17 | 3 |
| Scottish Affairs | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Social Services | 1 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Trade and Industry | 6 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 20 | — |
| Transport | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 2 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 24 | 8 | 0 |
| Welsh Affairs | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — |
asked the Lord Privy Seal how many memoranda have been presented by Government Departments to each departmental Select Committee and Sub-Committee for each Session since their appointment.
| 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | 1984–85 | 1985–86 | |
| Agriculture | 18 | 7 | 19 | 10 | 7 | 14 | 6 |
| Defence | 32 | 30 | 18 | 12 | 54 | 65 | 14 |
| Education | 21 | 24 | 35 | 21 | 5 | 6 | 2 |
| Employment | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| Energy | 18 | 11 | 17 | 21 | 19 | 11 | 2 |
| Environment | 2 | 6 | 9 | 11 | 32 | 29 | — |
| Foreign Affairs | 51 | 53 | 49 | 48 | 41 | 62 | 8 |
J. J. Boyd Barrett, Mr. F. H. Wise, Mr. J. Lloyd, Professor R. Mace, Mr. W. Dyfri Jones, Professor D. Morris, Professor R. E. Thomas, Mr. R. R. MacKay, Mr. W. S. Cole*, Dr. D. Stickler, Professor B. Archer*, Dr. S. Wanhill, Mr. D. Jones, Mr. P. Algar.
The number of memoranda submitted to departmental Select Committees in each Session since 1979 by Government Departments other than that which they were appointed to examine is as follows:
The number of memoranda presented to the departmental Select Committees and their Sub-Committees in each Session since 1979 by Government Departments is as follows:
| 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | 1984–85 | 1985–86 | |
| Sub-Committee Overseas Development | 25 | 37 | 28 | 32 | — | — | — |
| Home Affairs | 8 | 11 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 1 |
| Sub-Committee Race | |||||||
| Relations and Immigration | 2 | 24 | 23 | 12 | 18 | 9 | 4 |
| Scottish Affairs | 3 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 4 | 7 | — |
| Social Services | 17 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 17 | 12 | 1 |
| Trade and Industry | 65 | 34 | 54 | 19 | 10 | 32 | — |
| Transport | 9 | 12 | 18 | 14 | 13 | 11 | — |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 33 | 43 | 71 | 26 | 55 | 44 | 5 |
| Sub-Committee Welsh Affairs | * | * | * | * | 8 | 5 | 1 |
| Welsh Affairs | 5 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 12 | — |
| *It is not possible to apportion memoranda between the Committee and the Sub-Committee for this period. | |||||||
asked the Lord Privy Seal how many committee temporary assistants are employed by each of the Select Committees; how many have been appointed since the new committees were established; what is the cost each year; and how many have had their appointments extended beyond the initial two years.
I shall reply as soon as possible.
asked the Lord Privy Seal what is the average period that has elapsed from publication of reports of departmental Select Committees to receipt of the Government response; and what is the average period elapsing relating to each of the committees.
The average period elapsing between the publication of reports of departmental Select Committees and the receipt of the Government response is 109 days. The average period elapsing for each individual Committee is as follows:
| Average No. of Days for each Committee | |
| Agriculture | 112 |
| Defence | 88 |
| Education | 184 |
| Employment | 89 |
| Energy | 80 |
| Environment | 84 |
| Foreign Affairs | 74 |
| Home Affairs | 123 |
| Scottish Affairs | 89 |
| Social Services | 145 |
| Trade and Industry | 83 |
| Transport | 158 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 81 |
| Welsh Affairs | 182 |
asked the Lord Privy Seal what is the total number of witnesses who have appeared before each of the
| Committee | Full-time staff | Clerks | Higher Executive Officers/Chief Office Clerks | Office Clerks | Secretaries | Specialist Assistants |
| Agriculture | 3 | 2 | — | — | 1 | — |
| Defence | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Education, Science and Arts | 4 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Employment | 3 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Energy | 4 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Environment | *6 | *3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Foreign Affairs | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Home Affairs | 4 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
The information is as follows:
| Government Departments | Associated Public Bodies | Others | |
| Agriculture | 118 | 68 | 266 |
| Defence | 348 | 0 | 224 |
| Education | 170 | 75 | 666 |
| Employment | 51 | 92 | 372 |
| Energy | 130 | 106 | 196 |
| Environment | 111 | 63 | 364 |
| Foreign Affairs | 170 | 29 | 163 |
| Sub-Committee Overseas Development | 78 | 22 | 69 |
| Home Affairs | 77 | 5 | 245 |
| Sub-Committee Race Relations & Immigration | 141 | 88 | 405 |
| Scottish Affairs | 127 | 81 | 267 |
| Social Services | 114 | 0 | 856 |
| Trade and Industry | 122 | 162 | 250 |
| Transport | 96 | 83 | 481 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 107 | 14 | 112 |
| Sub-Committee | 78 | 5 | 101 |
| Welsh Affairs | 78 | 118 | 218 |
asked the Lord Privy Seal how many full-time staff are engaged principally in work for each of the departmental Select Committees; what is the number within each grade; and what is the total staff employed within the Committee Office.
The permanent staff working for the departmental Select Committees, and their grades, are shown in the following table:
| Committee | Full-time staff | Clerks | Higher Executive Officers/Chief Office Clerks | Office Clerks | Secretaries | Specialist Assistants |
| Scottish Affairs | 3 | 2 | — | — | 1 | — |
| Social Services | 4 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Trade and Industry | 4 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Transport | 5 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Treasury and Civil Service | 6 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 2 |
| Welsh Affairs | 3 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Total | 59 | 27 | 11 | 2 | 14 | 5 |
asked the Lord Privy Seal which reports of departmental Select Committees have been noticed on the Order Paper as relevant to debate on the Estimates days provided for in Standing Order No. 19(1).
The information is as follows:
First Report, Session 1982–83 of the Education, Science and Arts Committee, "Prison Education" together with the Second Report of the Committee Session 1983–84 "Observation on the Government Reply to the First Report for the Education. Science and Arts Committee, Session 1982–83". Debated on 4 July 1984.
Second Report from the Energy Committee on the Department of Energy's Supplementary Estimate for £230 million in respect of the Coal Industry—8 March 1984.
Fourth Report from the Energy Committee on the Department of Energy's Winter Supplementary Estimate for £45 million in respect of the British National Oil Corporation—18 December 1984.
Fifth Report from the Energy Committee on Government Oil Price Policy and the Department of Energy's Spring Supplementary Estimate for £20 million in respect of the British National Oil Corporation—14 March 1985.
"Department of the Environment's Main Estimates, 1984–85" (Second Report, Session 1983–84, HC 414)—4 July 1984.
"Property Services Agency Main Estimates 1984–85" (Third Report, Session 1983–84, HC 444)—17 July 1984.
"Department of the Environment's Main Estimates, 1985–86" (Third Report, Session 1984–85, HC 414)—11 July 1985.
"Property Services Agency Main Estimates 1985–86" (Fourth Report, Session 1984–85, HC 415)—11 July 1985.
Second Report (1982–83) Turks and Caicos Islands: Airport Development on Providenciales (HC 112) (Est).
Second Report (1983–84) Grenada; and Fourth Report (1984–85) FCO/ODA Estimates 1984–85 (HC 226, 421) (Est).
Second Report (1984–85) Famine in Africa; and First Report (1985–86) Winter Supplementary Estimates 1985–86 (HC 123) (Est).
Community Care, Second Report 1984–85, from the Social Services Committee.
Third Report 1984–85: Trade with China, from the Trade and Industry Committee.
Second Report, Session 1982–83, Spring Supplementary Estimates, from the Treasury and Civil Service Committee.
Social Services
Claimants
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) how many claimants were the responsibility of the Harlesden office of his Department as at May 1979, December 1984 and the latest available date; and how many staff there were in the office for the same period;(2) how many claimants were the responsibility of the Neasden office of his Department as at May 1979, December 1984 and the latest available date; and how many staff there were in the office for the same period;
(3) how many claimants were the responsibility of the Cricklewood office of his Department as at May 1979, December 1984 and the latest available date; and how many staff there were in the office for the same period;
I shall let the right hon. Member have replies as soon as possible.
Social Security Reform
asked the Secretary of State fcr Social Services if he will provide the figures, for all the cases analysed in tables P1 to P6 of the technical annex to the "Reform of Social Security", published 16 December 1985, for an unmodified state earnings related pension scheme on the same basis as those quoted for a modified state earnings related pension scheme.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish in the Official Report figures similar to those given in tables P1 to P6 of the technical annex of the "Reform of Social Security" on the basis of a rate of return of 1½ per cent. , 2 per cent. and 2½ percent.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Dunfermline, East (Mr. Brown) on 20 December at columns 435–436.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish figures, for all categories listed in the technical annex to the "Reform of Social Security", for changes in disposable income following the White Paper proposals by comparison with current benefit levels in 1985–86.
The figures in the technical annex already illustrate these changes.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services on what basis the rate of return figures quoted in tables P1 to P6 of the technical annex to the "Reform of Social Security" are calculated.
The rate of return figures used in tables P1 to P6 of the technical annex to the White Paper "Reform of Social Security" are calculated in real terms net of increases in prices.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services at what levels of gross income entitlement to family credit will cease for a family with one, two, three and four children.
These levels would depend on the ages of the children and would, therefore, vary between families of the same size. They would be determined by the actual decisions about benefit rates to be taken nearer the time of implementation in April 1988. However, using the illustrative figures contained in the technical annex to the social security White Paper, some examples would be as follows:
| Level of gross income* at which entitlement to family credit ceases£ | |
| Family with one child aged 3 | 129 |
| Family with two children aged 4 and 6 | 141 |
| Family with three children aged 3, 8 and 11 | 165 |
| Family with four children aged 3, 8, 11 and 16 | 197 |
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what arrangements are planned under the family credit scheme to deal with (a) those who move in and out of short-term or temporary jobs, (b) lay-offs, (c) those employed in more than one part-time job, (d) those whose employers are not liable to pay tax and national insurance contributions and (e) cases of marriage break-up where the parent in receipt of family credit is not the parent who has care of the child or children.
Detailed procedures have not been finalised. On (a), to be entitled to family credit a person will have to be engaged and normally engaged in remunerative work. If a person in a short-term or temporary job fulfils the "normally engaged" condition and family credit is payable, he will be subject to the rule in paragraph 3·83 of the White Paper "Reform of Social Security" (Cmnd. 9691) that an award will end if the payee loses his job or moves to a new employer. The situations in (b),(c) and (d) all concern payment of family credit through employers, and the detailed procedures in this area are to be the subject of further consultations with employers. On(e), the intention is that there will be provision for family credit to be withdrawn in this sort of situation.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he will be consulting interested voluntary organisations as well as local authorities on the unresolved housing benefit questions listed in paragraph 3.64 of Cmnd. 9691.
Many of the matters which we will be discussing with local authority interests involve very detailed questions of administrative practice and procedure. But where it seems appropriate, we will certainly consider seeking the views of other organisations on an informal basis.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what procedures will be used to calculate family credit where a claimant is on emergency tax coding.
Detailed procedures have not been finalised, but as family credit will be based on normal net earnings it is anticipated that there will be provision for an estimate to be made of what the normal tax deduction would be.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will provide a breakdown by gross income level of the totals illustrated in the bottom line of tables 3(i)B, 3(ii)B, and 12(ii)B of the technical annex to the White Paper on the reform of social security, distinguishing, where possible, between couples and single parents, using the following or similar gross weekly income bands: under £50, £50– £74, £75– £99, £100–124 and –125 plus.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will provide estimates of the numbers of losers resulting from the changes to standard housing benefit proposed in the White Paper on the reform of social security, Cmnd. 9691, including the suggested 20 per cent. rate contribution; how many of these would lose entitlement to housing benefit altogether; and if he will break the above estimate down into the following categories: (a) pensioners, (b) working households with children, distinguishing between couples and single parents, (c) working households without children, (d) others with children, distinguishing between couples and single parents and (e) others without children.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many households currently claiming housing benefit will lose entitlement to (a) rent rebate and (b) rate rebate, under the proposals in Cmnd. 9691; and, in each case, what is the number of pensioner households and the number of working households with and without children.
[pursuant to his reply, 15 January 1986, c. 596]: Using the illustrative assumptions in the technical annex to the White Paper*, including a minimum contribution to domestic rates of 20 per cent., the estimated numbers losing entitlement are shown below. In the case of working households with children, the loss of entitlement would often arise because of increased income through the proposed family credit, and would be more than offset by the increased entitlement in that respect.
| Thousands | ||
| Rent Rebate/Allowance | Rate Rebate | |
| Total | 460 | 810 |
| —pensioners | 140 | 330 |
| —working households with children | 170 | 290 |
| —working households without children | 80 | 70 |
Note: *Cmnd. 9691.
Maternity Allowance
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what savings are expected to accrue from the proposed changes in maternity allowance; and what estimate Her Majesty's Government have made of income arising as a result of taxation of the statutory maternity allowance.
These estimates will depend on decisions to be taken following the outcome of the consultations on maternity allowance currently under way with employers' and other interested organisations. I shall write to my hon. Friend when these decisions have been taken.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many women eligible for the maternity allowance under current arrangements are expected to lose by the proposed changes; and how many women currently ineligible are expected to gain under the new arrangements.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will provide estimates of the numbers of gainers and losers resulting from the proposed changes to the maternity allowance.
Provisonal estimates are that some 75,000 to 85,000 women will no longer qualify for the allowance. These almost entirely be women who were not in fact working when their pregnancies began, and who therefore do not come within the category for whom such an earnings-replacement benefit was intended. We estimate that between 5,000 and 10,000 will be entitled to the allowance for the first time.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will provide an estimate of the public expenditure saving as a result of the changes proposed to the maternity benefits including the abolition of the maternity grant (a) in total and (b) for each benefit.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Housing Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether, following his reply of 25 July 1985 to the hon. Member for Hornchurch, Official Report, column 742, he is now in a position to clarify whether nondependent deductions made from the housing benefit of households with non-dependent income support claimants living with them will be abolished.
We are still considering the future arrangements for non-dependent contributions.
Hospital Fires
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services to what factors he attributes the increase of 9 per cent. in the number of fires in hospitals and nursing homes between 1981 and 1983.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Visually Handicapped Persons
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he intends to publish his Department's fact-finding exercise on services for the visually handicapped.
I cannot yet add to my reply to the hon. Member on 20 December at column 411.
School Nurses
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services to what factors he attributes the decrease in the number of children seen by school nurses in 1984 as compared with 1980.
The decrease of 2 per cent. between 1980 and 1984 in the number of children seen by school nurses in England coincided with a fall of 10 per cent. in the maintained school population. The percentage of pupils seen by nurses rose from 54 per cent. in 1980 to 59 per cent. in 1984.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether the figures for the number of children seen by school nurses in 1979 in his answer of 18 December 1985, Official Report, column 237, is strictly comparable with those for the succeeding years.
1979 was the first year for which this information was collected centrally and reporting was less complete than in later years. I am sorry that an explanatory note to this effect was not included in my previous reply.
Radiation (Studies)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether the studies being undertaken by the committee on the medical aspects of radiation in the environment particularly relating to the incidence of leukaemia and lymphatic cancer in young people living close to the royal ordnance factory Burghfield and Atomic Weapons Research Establishment Aldermaston will be made public; and when he expects the committee to report.
I shall let my hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.
Prescription Charges
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will introduce legislation to provide that prescription charges should be set at £2 or the actual cost of the prescribed drug, whichever is the lower; and if he will make a statement.
No. On average the total cost to the National Health Service of each item dispensed in 1984 was £4.39p.
Kidney Transplants
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will give the number of kidney transplants in 1985; if he has now completed his consideration of the provision of a national computer register; and if he will make a statement.
According to information supplied by the United Kingdom transplant service, the provisional number of kidney transplants performed in the United Kingdom in 1985 was 1,338. Although this is 8 per cent. lower than the record level in 1984, it still shows a 17 per cent. increase on the 1983 figure and we are confident that the overall trend is still rising. Further initiatives to publicise the organ donor card scheme are being prepared.We have studied estimates of the costs of establishing a free-standing national computer register of potential organ donors, and we are not convinced that at the present time the benefits would justify the large expenditure required. We are, however, exploring other methods of using computer facilities to identify potential donors, but do not expect to be able to make an announcement in the immediate future.
Consultants
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many cases of prima facie evidence of the failure of a consultant to meet the terms of a contract have been referred by him to the employing authority in each year since 1979.
I am not aware of any such cases and do not believe that an extensive search of records would be justified.
Cervical Screening
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, further to his answer of 19 December 1985, Official Report, column 324, which health authorities are running call and recall schemes for cervical cancer screening.
In my reply to the hon. Member on 19 December at columns 324–325 I listed those health authorities that in June 1985 either had implemented computerised call and recall systems or had firm plans to do so by the end of 1985. Health authorities will next be asked to report their progress towards implementing such systems in June 1986, as part of the normal planning and accountability process.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish such information as is held by his Department on the times taken by pathology laboratories to process cervical smears.
The information available to the Department is in general neither comprehensive nor in a publishable form. Furthermore, such information rapidly becomes out of date. Limited information from the British Society of Clinical Cytologists gave the result of a survey of 25 laboratories in one of its regions, which indicated that in the first half of 1985 it took less than four weeks to process a cervical smear in 10 laboratories, and between four and nine weeks in 15.All health authorities are to be asked to give priority to improving their cervical cancer screening programmes including ensuring that laboratories can meet demand and avoid backlogs, which should not regularly exceed one month's work.
Surgery Attendances
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what information is held by his Department about the number of patients attending doctors' surgeries.
None, but information is available from the general household survey about the number of consultations.
Kidney Patients
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is the basis of his statement that the incidence of chronic renal failure has not changed since 1978.
The basis of the statement was that we have no evidence, either from general discussion with clinicians in the field or from scientific literature that the incidence has changed. If the hon. Member is aware of any evidence of a change I should be grateful if he would draw it to my attention.
Adopted Children
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services, if he will introduce legislation to allow natural parents access to information about their children which have been adopted.
No. It is entirely up to the adopted person to decide whether he wishes his new identity to be disclosed to his natural parents.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when he proposes to reply to the two letters of 2 October and 29 November 1985 from Mr. and Mrs. Crawley of Hawthorn Crescent, Portsmouth, on the subject of access by natural parents to information about their children who have been adopted.
Mr. and Mrs. Crawley have written a number of letters on this issue since 1983. Their letter of 29 November to my right hon. Friend the Home Secretary was transferred to this Department and a brief reply in acknowledgement was sent to them although there was nothing further that could usefully be added to previous correspondence.
Growth Hormone
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will take steps to make available within the National Health Service for all those lacking sufficient human growth hormone the new genetically engineered growth hormone which came on the market in October 1985.
Biosynthetic growth hormone is available to any patient in the NHS diagnosed as requiring treatment of short stature caused by decreased or absent secretion of pituitary growth hormones by a specialist medical practitioner.
Nhs (General Managers)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many general managers so far appointed in the National Health Service at (i) regional, (ii) district and (iii) unit level, were in their previous jobs (a) doctors, (b) nurses, (c) businessmen, and (d) other occupations; and if he will give a breakdown of the last category.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Supplementary Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he will publish the number of families with children with additional requirements included in their supplementary benefit assessment, by type and average amount of additional requirement;.(2) if he will provide estimates for November 1985 of the number of standard housing benefit recipients, in total and according to the following household types
(a) pensioners, (b) working households with children, distinguishing between couples and single parents, (c)
working households without children, (d) others with children, distinguishing between couples and single parents and (e) others without children.
I shall let the hon. Member have replies as soon as possible.
Single Payments
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish the number and average amount of single payments made in the latest period for which figures are available to families with children, distinguishing between couples and single parents, in total and by type of single payment.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Income Support Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if it is proposed that 16 to 17-year-olds should be entitled to claim benefit in their own right once the income support scheme has come into effect.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Oldham, West (Mr. Meacher) on 13 January at column 495.
Invalid Care Allowance
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what arrangements are being made to deal with the claims made by married or cohabiting women for invalid care allowance since Mrs. Drake was awarded invalid care allowance by a tribunal on 1 March 1985; and if he will make a statement.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Exeter (Mr. Hannam) on 26 July at column 943.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many married and cohabiting women have submitted claims for invalid care allowance pending the European Court of Justice ruling on the Drake case, since 1 March 1985 (a) before 1 October 1985 and (b) before 1 December 1985.
4,588 and 7,632, of which 348 and 567, respectively, have been disallowed because qualifying conditions other than marital status were not satisfied.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what would be the current cost of extending invalid care allowance to married and co-habiting women (i) gross, (ii) net of savings on other national insurance benefits and (iii) net of savings on both means-tested and national insurance benefits.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to her on 24 July at column 603. This is the latest estimate made. There is insufficient information available to break the figures down further in the way requested.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if all claims for invalid care allowance by married or co-habiting women will be back-dated either to the date of claim or 22 December 1985 when the EEC directive 7/79 came into force, if the European Court upholds the Drake case decision; and if he will make a statement.
The date from which an award of a benefit is made is a matter for the independent statutory authorities, subject to the overriding time limits laid down in legislation. A claim for invalid care allowance can be valid for a period of up to three months before the date of claim or, if the adjudicating authorities are satisfied that there was good cause for claiming late, for up to 12 months before the date of claim.
Nhs (Private Contractors)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services why he treats as confidential the names of companies who have fallen down on privatised contracts.
When standards achieved in a contract are unsatisfactory, it is necessary for both the health authority and the contractor to examine what steps need to be taken to put things right. I do not consider this would be helped by publishing the name of the company concerned. If, despite these efforts, a contract has to be terminated, then the name of the contractor will become public.
Mentally Handicapped Children
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many children have been admitted for (a) long-term care and (b) short-term care of less than three months duration, to mental handicap hospitals in the last full year; and if he will name the hospitals and their locations.
[pursuant to his reply, 12 December 1985, c. 759–64]: I regret that the table in my reply contained a number of typing errors.
The heading to the last column should have read "Children admitted during 1984 but not discharged by the end of 1984".
Under South Western regional health authority the entry against Plymouth district health authority should have read "Tamar House" and in the last column the entry should have read 1".
Under Mersey regional health authority the second entry against Crewe district health authority should have read "Cranage Hall".
Primary Care Package
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list the district health authorities areas in which the £9 million primary care package awarded in 1983 has been spent.
[pursuant to his reply, 15 January 1986. c. 602]: Money is being spent from the £9 million primary care package within the following district health authority areas:
- Mersey RHA
- Liverpool
- St. Helen's and Knowsley
- South Sefton
- Wirral
- Northern RHA
- Gateshead
- Newcastle
- North Tyneside
- South Tees
- South Tyneside
- Sunderland
- North Western RHA
- Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley
- Blackpool Wyre and Fylde
- Bolton
- Burnley, Pendle and Rossendale
- Chorley and South Ribble
- Lancaster
- Central Manchester
- North Manchester
- Oldham
- Preston
- Rochdale
- Salford
- Tameside
- Trafford
- West Lancashire
- Wigan
- Trent RHA
- Leicestershire
- Nottingham
- Sheffield
- Southern Derbyshire
- West Midlands RHA
- Central Birmingham
- East Birmingham
- North Birmingham
- South Birmingham
- West Birmingham
- Coventry
- Sandwell
- Walsall
- Wolverhampton
- Yorkshire RHA
- Airedale
- Bradford
- Hull
- Leeds Eastern
- Leeds Western
- South Western RHA
- Bristol and Weston
- North East Thames RHA
- Haringey
- Newham
- Tower Hamlets
- City and Hackney
- Islington
- Hampstead
- Bloomsbury
- North West Thames RHA
- Brent
- Hammersmith and Fulham
- Paddington and North Kensington
- Victoria
- South East Thames RHA
- Greenwich
- West Lambeth
- Camberwell
- Lewisham and North Southwark
- South West Thames RHA
- Richmond, Twickenham and Roehampton
- Wandsworth
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how much of the £9 million primary care package was spent centrally.
[pursuant to his reply, 15 January 1986, c. 602]: Extra provision for primary health care services in inner cities is spread over the period 1983–84 to 1988–89. In the first two years £85,000 has been spent on centrally funded initiatives. It is estimated that about £1·4 million will be spent on such projects over the whole period.
Income Support
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) using the assumptions in paragraph 2·4 of the technical annex to the White Paper, "Reform of Social Security" (Cmnd. 9691), how many claimants who currently receive supplementary benefit will receive no help under the new income support scheme;(2) using the assumptions in paragraph 2·4 of the West technical annex to the White Paper, "Reform of Social Security" (Cmnd. 9691), how many claimants who now receive housing benefit will receive no help under the new income support scheme;(3) using the assumptions in paragraph 2·4 of the technical appendix to the White Paper, "Reform of Social Security" (Cmnd. 9691), how many claimants who now West receive family income supplement will not be entitled to family credit;(4) how many families currently receiving family income supplement will not be entitled to family credit, on the basis of the structural reforms proposed in Cmnd. 9691.
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people will lose all benefit under the White Paper structural reforms taking 20 per cent. rates contribution into account; what is their client group and family status.
[pursuant to his replies, 19 December 1985, c. 318, 20 December, c. 434 and 15 January c. 596]: Using the illustrative assumptions in the technical annex to the White Paper, the information is as follows:
| Decreases in the number receiving income-related benefits ('000 rounded to 10,000) | ||
| Housing benefit | Supplementary benefit/income support | |
| Client group | ||
| Pensioners age 80+ | 20 | 10 |
| Pensioners age 60–79 | 290 | 60 |
| Sick or disabled | 10 | * |
| Lone parent | 70 | * |
| Couples with children: | ||
| —in full-time work | 260 | — |
| —not in full-time work | 10 | * |
| Others: | ||
| —in full-time work | 100 | — |
| —not in full-time work | 50 | 20 |
| Total | 820 | 90 |
| Family status | ||
| Pensioners: | ||
| —single | 130 | 30 |
| —couples | 180 | 40 |
| Non-pensioners with children: | ||
| —lone parents | 70 | * |
| —couples | 280 | * |
| Non-pensioners without children | ||
| —single age 25† | 90 | 10 |
| —single age 25 | 20 | 10 |
| —couples | 50 | 10 |
| Total | 820 | 90 |
The figures in the table do not show the net effects of the changes. They take no account of the people —broadly estimated to number more than 150,000—not now getting supplementary benefit who will qualify for income support, nor of the number—broadly estimated to be rather under 50,000—not now receiving housing benefit who would do so under the new arrangements. Nor do they take account of the fact that, in the case of working families with children, loss of entitlement to housing benefit would often arise because of increased income through the proposed family credit, and would be more than offset by the increased entitlement in that respect.
The number of familieé now getting family income supplement (FIS) who would not receive family credit is so small — probably under 1,000 — that no reliable estimate is possible. We expect family credit to help about twice as many families as now receive FIS.