Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 103: debated on Thursday 30 October 1986

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Thursday 30 October 1986

Prime Minister

Long Lawford

26.

asked the Prime Minister if she has any plans to make an official visit to Long Lawford near Rugby

Tropical Forests

72.

asked the Prime Minister if she will make it the policy of Her Majesty's Government to seek to promote the preservation of tropical forests through the co-ordination of aid policies in the form of incentives to projects for viable agriculture and forestry schemes in rain forest zones, with trade policies for the encouragement of commerce in sustainably produced tropical hardwoods; and if she will make a statement.

The Government's commitment to the wise use and replenishment of the world's tropical forests was confirmed by my right hon. Friend the Member for Aylesbury (Mr. Raison), then Minister for Overseas Development, on 19 May, at column 18. We already support forest management projects in rain forest zones through the aid programme and are ready to consider further proposals. The Government have also given their support to the Food and Agriculture Organisation's tropical forestry action plan.The Government ratified the international tropical timber agreement in 1984 and are a member of the related Tropical Timber Organisation, which was established in 1986. One of the principal functions of this organisation is to encourage trade in tropical hardwoods on the basis of sustainable and renewable resources.

World Food Conference

121.

asked the Prime Minister what response she has made to the proposal of Sir Henry Plumb, a member of the European Parliament, for a world food conference to consider the food surpluses of the developed world against the background of famine in the developing world.

We very much share the concerns expressed by Sir Henry Plumb and we have already taken initiatives in the appropriate organisations. But famine prevention and agricultural surpluses are separate issues and must therefore be tackled separately.

Engagements

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 October.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 October.

asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 30 October.

This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in this House, I shall he having further meetings later today.

Eurotunnel Plc

asked the Prime Minister what recent discussions she or her Ministers have had with Eurotunnel plc on the structure of the company; and if it remains the policy of Her Majesty's Government not to invest directly in the consortium.

Neither I nor any other Ministers have had discussions with Eurotunnel plc about the structure of the company. As I made clear to the House on Tuesday, no Government money will be involved in the project.

Education And Science

Aids

asked the Secretary of State for Education and science what plans he has to educate children as to the possible health hazards of (a) promiscuity and (b) homosexuality, with specific reference to acquired immune deficiency syndrome; and if he will make a statement.

The Government have made it clear, in their recent draft circular on sex education at school and in the booklet "Children at School and problems related to AIDS", circulated under cover of "Administrative Memorandum 2/86", that schools should see it as part of their task to warn pupils of the health risks of promiscuous sexual behaviour, whether heterosexual or homosexual, and should provide factual information about the AIDS virus (HIV) and modes of transmission of infection.

Single Sex Education

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will make a statement on Government policy on single sex school education.

The Government wish to preserve existing opportunities for parents to opt for single sex schools where the demand warrants it and where the schools are educationally effective.

Rothampsted Experimental Research Station

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science to what extent cuts in expenditure have affected Rothampsted experimental research station; and whether further cuts are contemplated.

Rothampsted experimental station (RES) is a grant-aided institute of the Agricultural and Food Research Council (AFRC). I understand from the AFRC that reductions in funding have resulted in the termination, deferment and curtailment of some work at RES. This includes work on the regulation of plant processes, soil properties and composition, soil fertility and plant nutrition, crops and their environment, yield variation and aerobiology, pests of non-cereal arable crops and soil management and cultivation.

The work programme of the soil survey and land resources centre (SSLRC), located at RES, is being curtailed following reductions in the funds for work commissioned by my right hon. Friend the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.

Decisions about future financial provision for RES will be taken by AFRC once my right hon. friend, on the advice of the Advisory Board for the Research Councils, has decided the level of the council's grant-in-aid for 1987–88. These decisions will be taken towards the end of this calendar year.

Liverpool

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will make a statement on his recent discussion with a delegation of Liverpool parents about the problems facing the education system in that city.

I met members of the Liverpool Association of Parent Governors and Representatives on 27 October. They expressed concern about aspects of school provision in Liverpool. Following the meeting I undertook to write to the association about a number of the points raised by the members.

Literacy

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will give the level of Government funding of the adult basic literacy unit for the current and three previous financial years; and what is the estimated contribution for 1987–88.

The adult literacy and basic skills unit (ALBSU) is jointly funded by the DES and the Welsh Office. The information requested is as follows:

Financial yearDES grant £Welsh Office grant £Total grant £
1983–841,439,26738,1601,477,427
1984–851,361,93751,8431,413,780
1985–861,638,000Nil1,638,000
11986–872,052,000118,0002,170,000
11987–882,052,000123,0002,175,000
1 Estimated contributions.

Adult Education

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what funding has been given in each of the last three years to the National Institute for Adult and Continuing Education for local development projects for the unemployed.

The funding was £119,206 in the financial year 1984–85 (the first year of the REPLAN programme), £528,671 in 1985–86, and (on present plans) up to £583,000 in the current financial year. These figures include contributions from the Welsh Office and the Manpower Services Commission.

Council For The Accreditation Of Teacher Education

asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will make a statement on the future of the Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education.

I am of course aware of the views expressed in the third report from the Education, Science and Arts Committee (House of Commons 40–1) and the Government will offer a full response to this report in due course. I do not propose to anticipate that in any detailed way, but I do wish to make plain my confidence in the council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. The council was established only after the fullest consultation with all the major interest groups and there was similar wide consultation about the basis for its scrutiny of teacher training programmes. I believe that the council is contributing substantially to the improvement of initial teacher training. It is carrying out that important task effectively and with tact and consideration. It has my full confidence. In due course the council will complete its remit. I will then review the position, but meantime I propose no change in its terms of reference or the criteria to which it is working.

Attorney-General

Magistrates Courts (London)

asked the Attorney-General under what powers prosecutions in magistrates courts in London were conducted under the title of the Crown Prosecution Service before 1 October.

Commencing in the latter part of 1985, the Director of Public Prosecutions began to establish a network of local offices in the Metropolitan police and Surrey constabulary areas. They were grouped in three areas (inner London, outer London north and outer London South-Surrey) corresponding with the proposed areas for the Crown Prosecution Service. Although such offices may sometimes have been referred to as the Crown Prosecution Service, they in fact constituted part of the Department of the Director of Public Prosecutions and each area was headed by an assistant director of public prosecutions; the discharge of their duties was governed by the Prosecution of Offence Act 1979 and the regulations made thereunder. Section 4 of the Act empowers the director to assume responsibility for any prosecutions irrespective of who may have instituted the proceedings.

Hackney Council Chamber (Firearms Incident)

asked the Attorney-General if he will call on the Director of Public Prosecutions to investigate the circumstances surrounding the firing of a loaded pistol in the council chamber of the London borough of Hackney on 22 October.

No. The director has neither the facilities nor the powers necessary for the investigation of alleged crime. That is the function of the police, and I understand that an inquiry is in progress.

Bbc (Libel Action)

asked the Attorney-General what action he proposes to take on the representations he has received concerning alleged interference with witnesses in the cases of Hamilton v. BBC and Howarth v. BBC.

I have received no representations of the nature mentioned in the question. The position is as stated in my reply to the hon. Member for Workington (Mr. Campbell-Savours) on 29 October 1986.

Newspapers (Prosecutions)

asked the Attorney-General if he will institute proceedings under the Race Relations Act against the Daily Express, Daily Mail, and the Sun in the light of material published by them between 14 and 17 October regarding the introduction of the new visa system for visitors from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria and Ghana; and if he will make a statement.

Although my consent is required for the institution of proceedings under section 5A of the Public Order Act 1936, the investigation of any such alleged offences is, as with any other alleged criminal offence, a function of the police and not the Director of Public Prosecutions or myself. If the hon. Member considers that an offence may have been committed, the proper course is for him to refer the matter to the police so that if, after proper investigation, it is appropriate, a report may be submitted to the Crown Prosecution Service with a view to obtaining my consent for proceedings.

Solicitor-General For Scotland

Mr William Mccrae

asked the Solicitor-General for Scotland how many police reports were made on the death of Mr. William McCrae in April 1985; by whom; and on which dates.

I am unable to provide this information. Reports submitted to the procurator fiscal by the police or any other investigating body or individual are confidential.

asked the Solicitor-General for Scotland if he will place in the Library a copy of (a) the pathologist's report and (b) the police reports into the death of Mr. William McCrae, a solicitor, in April 1985.

asked the Solicitor-General for Scotland on whose authority the decision was taken not to hold a fatal accident inquiry into the death of Mr William McCrae in April 1985; and when that decision was taken.

The decision not to hold a fatal accident inquiry was taken on 24 June 1985 on the authority of the Lord Advocate as required in terms of the Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths Inquiry (Scotland) Act 1976.

Home Department

Durham Prison

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will state (a) how many women on Durham H wing have been diagnosed as suffering from amenorrhoea during the past 24 months and (b) how many women on Durham H wing have undergone hysterectomies within the last 24 months.

I am advised by the Director of Prison Medical Services that he would consider it a breach of medical confidentially to publish sensitive medical information relating to patients in a particular establishment or unit because of the risk of identification of individual patients. If the hon. Member is concerned about a particular case or cases and will write to me I will endeavour to assist her.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the ages of the women who have been detained in Durham H wing during the past 24 months.

The ages on reception of the women who have been detained in Durham H wing during the past 24 months are as follows:

Age on receptionNumber
181
194
204
213
223
237
242
252
265
271
282
292
302
316
322
333
341
353
363
371
381
392
401
431
461
512
532
532
541
562
571
631

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many women have been detained in Durham H wing during the past 24 months.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many prisoners at Durham prison have relatives living within a 50-mile radius of the prison.

This information is not held separately and could not be obtained without incurring disproportionate cost.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many strip searches were carried out in Durham prison H wing within the last 12 months on (a) all prisoners and (b) category A prisoners; and what unlawful materials were found as a result of these searches.

Strip searching is a routine security measure, and establishments are not required to record all such searches. However, Durham has, exceptionally, begun to keep records of strip searches in respect of category A female inmates. These, together with earlier records of cell changes and cell searches (which would normally involve a strip search), indicate that during the 12 months ending 30 September there were 53 strip searches of category A female prisoners in Durham.I understand that records covering the same period show that a quantity of cannabis was found on one occasion during a strip search of a non-category A prisoner. But the justification for strip searching lies not only in the fact that staff do discover items (such as drugs, syringes, plastic knives sharpened into daggers, and scissors) which they would not otherwise find, but in the deterrent effect which such searching undoubtedly has.

Independent Television

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he expects to be able to announce the timetable for tendering for the Independent Television franchises due to end in 1989.

As my right hon. Friend made clear in announcing the Government's initial response to the Peacock committee's report, we are anxious that the option for change in the arrangements for the award of Independent Television contracts should remain open. This would not be the case if the IBA arranges new contracts to take effect from the beginning of 1990 for the maximum of eight years permitted under present law. Accordingly, my right hon. Friend has been considering with the IBA possible alternative arrangements under which contracts would be awarded for a shorter period. He hopes to be able to announce his conclusions before too long.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what consideration his Department has given to separating the Teletext service, and subscription user group facilities, from the Independent Television programme franchises after 1989.

We shall be looking at these matters, amongst others, in our consideration of the report of the Committee on Financing the BBC.

Visitors

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the total number of those who were admitted as visitors in 1985 from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria and Ghana; how many of these stayed on without permission; and what was the percentage involved.

In 1985 the number of passengers who were admitted as visitors from these countries was:

Number
India169,000
Pakistan81,100

Number

Bangladesh11,200
Ghana27,100
Nigeria164,000

I regret that the other information requested is not available.

Iba (Deputy Chairman)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the appointment of the last deputy chairman of the Independent Broadcasting Authority expired; and when he intends to appoint a replacement.

The deputy chairman resigned on 7 October 1985. We hope to appoint a replacement shortly.

Police Interviews (Tape Recording)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he intends to introduce a national scheme of tape recorded interviews between police and suspects; and if he will give a date for its commencement.

Yes. We have circulated to police forces and other interested parties a draft code of practice on tape recording of interviews by police officers in police stations with persons suspected of criminal offences. After considering comments, we intend to lay the code before Parliament early next year for approval, in accordance with section 60 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984.Tape recording is already under way on a trial basis in areas of several forces. So far some 34 police forces have been allocated funds for the current financial year to prepare interview rooms for use for tape recording. Further funds will be allocated to extend and complete coverage over a five-year period up to 1991.

Teaching Posts, Brent

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many new teaching posts have been agreed for the London borough of Brent under section 11 of the Local Government Act; and if he will give details.

Approval in principle was given on 14 August for grant under section 11 of the Local Government Act 1966 to be paid on 177 posts which Brent intended to establish. These included teaching posts in schools, a programme director, two assistants and five tutors for in-service training. Our understanding was that the aim of these posts was to tackle under-achievement among pupils of Commonwealth origin. Since then, allegations have been made that the council intends to use the posts in ways that go beyond this. I have, therefore, sought further information from Brent. No grant will be paid unless I am satisfied that the posts meet our usual criteria.

Ports Of Entry (Security)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many Securicor staff are retained by the Home Office on security work at ports of entry; what is the nature of their duties; and what has been the total annual cost in each of the past five years.

Securicor Limited is contracted to the Home Office to provide staff who act as orderlies for passengers under examination by an immigration officer and for the purpose of guarding and escorting persons detained under the Immigration Act 1971.There are 37 Securicor posts at ports of entry. These are covered by shift work, some for 24 hours per day, so the actual number of personnel employed is greater. The cost of the service is a matter of contract, which it would not be right for me to disclose.

Employment

South Africa

asked the Paymaster General what action is being taken to discourage the promotion of tourism to South Africa.

Following the recent Commonwealth review meeting in London, the British Government decided to put a "voluntary ban" on the promotion of tourism to South Africa. I would like to explain the reasons for this and what it means for the travel trade and the public.Over the years Britain, along with our Commonwealth and EC partners, has adopted a number of restrictive measures against South Africa. These measures have been designed to impress upon the South African Government the compelling need to dismantle the system of apartheid and to erect the structures of democracy and racial justice in South Africa. The Commonwealth review meeting came to the conclusion that, regrettably, there had not been adequate progress towards the abolition of apartheid, and that further measures were necessary.In Britain we live in a free society and it would not be right for us to take powers to restrict freedom of travel. In introducing what therefore has to be a voluntary measure, the Government are seeking the co-operation of all those involved that they will not promote South Africa in this country as a tourist destination, that is to say as a destination for leisure travel. It is not intended that those who decide to visit South Africa, for whatever reason, should be prevented from doing so.I am therefore appealing directly to those in Britain involved in the travel business — travel agents, tour operators and carriers—not to promote South Africa as a tourist destination. I also appeal to the media to refrain from carrying advertisements or other material which promotes South Africa as a tourist destination. My right hon. and noble Friend will be asking ABTA and representatives of the advertising industry to bring the Government's policy to the attention of their members.I very much hope that those involved will refrain from promoting tourism to South Africa, as a demonstration of the strong opposition in Britain to the principles and practice of apartheid. The decision whether to refrain from promoting tourism to South Africa is one for the individuals, companies and organisations concerned to take.Meanwhile, if the South African Government were to take those steps for which we and our partners have called, in order to establish a process of dialogue across racial lines, we have made clear, in the Commonwealth communiqué, that we stand ready to review the situation and if appropriate to rescind the measures we have adopted.

Hotel And Catering Industry

asked the Paymaster General what is the average earnings in the hotel and catering industry; and how this compares with the average for all other sectors of the economy.

The latest available information on average weekly earnings is that for April 1985 and relates to full-time adult employees working a full week. Information on the average earnings in the hotel and catering industry and all other sectors of the economy is published in table X2 of the report, "New Earnings Survey 1985", part B, a copy of which is available in the Library.

asked the Paymaster General what proportion of hotel and restaurant employers visited by the Wages Inspectorate were underpaying workers during the past year; what was the average pay for waitresses during the past year; and what was the average pay for female kitchen staff last year.

No estimates of the proportion of employers paying workers less than the wages councils' minimum rates have been made. However, Wages Inspectorate statistics for 1985 show that 37·3 per cent. of establishments covered by the Licensed Residential Establishment and Licensed Restaurant Wages Council which were visited by wages inspectors were found to have underpaid one or more workers. This figure is not representative of all establishments covered by wages councils because the Wages Inspectorate tends to concentrate on the firms more likely to be underpaying.The latest available information on gross average earnings for waitresses and female kitchen staff is that for April 1985 and is published in table 9 of part A of "New Earnings Survey 1985", a copy of which is available in the Library.

Inner City Pilot Projects

asked the Paymaster General what progress has been made in the eight inner city pilot projects; and if he will make a statement.

The eight inner city task forces have made considerable progress in drawing up, and now starting to implement, plans to achieve the objectives of the inner cities initiative. The task forces are ensuring that existing Government resources are targeted more effectively on their areas, and are also looking for new ways of encouraging employment and enterprise. Already some 34 projects involving about £1·3 million of the inner cities initiative budget have been approved for support. There have also been major projects financed by, for example, the Department of Environment, the Home Office and the Manpower Services Commission under other mainstream programmes in the task force areas as part of our extra attention to those areas.We are addressing a number of further particular issues:

Plans are advanced for a scheme using local labour on an urban development project in Handsworth. This will ensure that local people benefit from the jobs available. We intend to carry forward this approach in other task force areas.
A number of projects aim to encourage enterprise, particularly among young people and ethnic minorities. These include support for black enterprise agencies, skill training facilities and managed workshops, and the Industrial Society's "Headstart in Business" courses which we are supporting in six task force areas.
We are particularly concerned to encourage sponsorship by private sector firms of projects under the community programme. At least 10 of the 20 pilot community programme projects with improved funding to encourage private sector involvement will be in task force areas.
I have also reached an agreement with the Association of British Insurers to set up contact points to deal locally with problems of the availability of insurance for businesses in our inner cities.

Action For Jobs (Advertising Campaign)

asked the Paymaster General how much has been spent on the Action for Jobs advertising campaign, nationally arid regionally; how he expects to assess its effects; and what effects he expects it to have.

So far about £6·5 million has been spent on Action for Jobs advertising. This represents less than 0·01 per cent. of the total expenditure of £3 billion this year on more than 30 employment, enterprise and training measures described in the Action for Jobs booklet. Since this is a national campaign, no regional breakdown is available.The purpose of the campaign is to increase awareness of the wide range of opportunities on offer and to encourage people to pick up the Action for Jobs booklet. We are monitoring closely the effectiveness of the campaign.

Open College

asked the Paymaster General on what date he now expects the Open College (College of the Air) to (a) begin enrolling students and (b) start broadcasting; and if he will make a statement.

The Open College (the agreed name for what was initially known as the College of the Air) will begin operations (including broadcasting) in September 1987. The detailed arrangements for enrolling students, including timing, are still under consideration. These and other aspects of the college's programme will be announced in due course.

asked the Paymaster General what funds have so far been made available to the Open College (College of the Air), either directly from Government funds or through the Manpower Services Commission; what public funds are anticipated to be required for the Open College for the remainder of this financial year; and what funds have so far been made available from private sources.

While its own staff are being recruited, preparations for the launch of the college are being undertaken by staff of the Manpower Services Commission under the guidance of the college chairman. As yet MSC staff costs represent the only significant element of expenditure on this project. The precise level of expenditure on the college this financial year and in succeeding years will depend on the outcome of the detailed planning and discussions which are now in progress. However, I am pleased to say that the indications so far are that there is substantial private sector interest in sponsoring or otherwise supporting the college's activities.

asked the Paymaster General who determined the level of salary proposed for the chief executive of the Open College (College of the Air).

The chairman of the Open College was advised by independent recruitment consultants that this level of remuneration would need to be offered in order to attract applicants of the required calibre and experience.

Manpower Services Commission

asked the Paymaster General how many jobs have been created by the Manpower Services Commission's voluntary projects programme sponsored Instant Muscle programme; and how much each job created has cost the Government.

In 1985 Instant Muscle helped 220 young people into self-employment, jobs or the community programme at a cost of around £980 per job. In the first half of 1986, 270 people have entered employment at a cost of around £611 per job.

asked the Paymaster General if he will make a statement on the Manpower Services Commission's voluntary projects programme decision not to increase its funding of Instant Muscle Ltd. of Slough above that of the 1985 level.

The voluntary projects development programme, from which Instant Muscle is funded, has a similar budget in 1986–87 to that for 1985–86. With other approaches to fostering enterprise within the programme proving successful, it is not possible at present to expand one particular approach.

Environment

Land Register (Searches)

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has about the length of time each London borough takes to reply to local searches in the local land charges register and to standard additional inquiries.

My Department does not collect such information, but I understand that the Law Society publishes in its Gazette the names of those authorities taking one month or more to respond to such applications.

Property Services Agency

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the present number of personnel employed by the Property Services Agency in north Yorkshire, and their locations.

The present number of PSA personnel in north Yorkshire is 748 (including 27 non-industrial staff on site control and 447 industrial staff) employed at the following locations:

LocationNon-industrialIndustrialTotal
Area Works Office, York6868
District Works Office, York162137
Area District Works Office, Strensall51116
Area District Works Office, Leconfield62228
Driffield outstation11
District Works Office, Fylingdales38121159
Area District Works Office, Staxton Wold112839
District Works Office, Disforth91625
Area District Works Office, RAF Catterick314
Area District Works Office, RAF Leeming82028
Area District Works Office, RAF Topcliffe549
Area District Works Office, Linton on Ouse6713
District Works Office, Harrogate161127

Location

Non-industrial

Industrial

Total

Area District Works Office, Menwith Hill193453
Area District Works Office, Ripon51217
District Works Office, Catterick35139174
Area Estates, Catterick2323
Full Sutton Site Control77
Menwith Hill Site Control22
Catterick (MQs and RAF) Site Control77
York (Imphal) Site Control22
York (IBAP Store) Site Control11
Staxton Wold Site Control11
RAF Topcliffe Site Control33
Steeplebush Site Control11
RAF Leeming Site Control33
301447748

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the total cost of overheads in the running of the Property Services Agency in (a) north Yorkshire and (b) the Leeds area during the last financial year.

Overheads (as per PSA management accounts) for 1985–86 were:

£ million
(a) North Yorkshire2·830
(b) Leeds2·850

Local Authorities (Compulsory Tendering)

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what arrangements have been followed in respect of consultation with those concerned in local authorities with the introduction of compulsory tendering in computer services, architectural services, local authority transport, printing and refuse disposal.

I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to the hon. Member for Liverpool, West Derby (Mr. Wareing) on 22 October, at cols. 877–78.

Departmental Vote

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he has any further proposals to revise the cash limit for class 10, vote 2.

Subject to parliamentary approval of the necessary Supplementary Estimate, the cash limit for class X, vote 2 will be increased by £445,000 from £180,646,000 to £181,091,000 to include the extra resources for the UK2000 initiative I announced on 14 July 1986, at cols. 683–89. The increase will be within the Department's existing public expenditure provision and will not add to the planning total of public expenditure.

Ordnance Survey

asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what financial targets he has set the Ordnance Survey for the four years from 1986–87 to 1989–90; and how these will be achieved.

After discussion with the Treasury, I have set the following targets for Ordnance Survey:

  • 1. To recover not less than 40 per cent. of the total cost of core activities by 1989–90.
  • 2. To maximise revenue on commercial activities and to recover not less than 110 per cent. of total costs of that category.
  • 3. To recover 100 per cent. of the total cost of public sector repayment work at home and overseas.
  • The Ordnance Survey plan for 1987–90 based on these targets has been approved and a copy has been deposited in the Library.

    Education Pooling

    asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he proposes to make any changes to the 1986–87 cash limit for rate support grants to local authorities in England in respect of education pooling.

    My right hon. Friend the then Secretary of State for Education and Science announced in December 1985 the revised contributions of local authorities to the education pools for 1985–86. The Inner London education authority's contribution was reduced by £31·5 million. The sum has now been refunded to ILEA; the balancing amounts will be recovered from other education authorities early in 1987–88.Subject to parliamentary approval of the necessary Supplementary Estimate, the 1986–87 cash limit for class X vote 6 will therefore be increased by £31,500,000 from £9,246,000,000 to £9,277,500,000. Expenditure on this Vote is not classified as public expenditure and so there are no implications for the Reserve.

    House Of Commons

    Banqueting And Dining Facilities

    asked the Lord Privy Seal for how long the register of bookings for dining rooms and other banqueting facilities in the House of Commons is kept after the period to which it refers.

    State Opening Of Parliament (Photograph)

    asked the Lord Privy Seal whether there are plans for marking the occasion of the next Opening of Parliament with a photograph of the House in session; and if he will make a statement.

    Yes. Following a resolution of the Services Committee in June, I understand that arrangements have been made for a photograph of the House in session to be taken between 2.30 and 3 pm on the afternoon of Wednesday 12 November, the day of the State Opening of Parliament. I am informed that the photograph will show the traditional view of the Chamber from a position behind the Serjeant at Arms Chair. It is intended that prints will be offered for sale to Members.The attention of hon. Members will be drawn to these arrangements by notices in the

    All Party Whip.

    Energy

    British Gas (Flotation)

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will list all those companies involved in the flotation of British Gas giving, in each case, the level of fees agreed and the arrangements governing the level of such fees; and if he will make a statement.

    I refer the hon. Member to the answer that my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State gave to the hon. Member for Holborn and St. Pancras (Mr. Dobson) on 13 June, at column 408, which listed the firms giving advice to my Department on the sale of British Gas. A number of other firms are involved in the detailed preparations for the sale. It is not the Government's practice to publish the fees paid to individual firms on privatisation exercises, as these are commercially confidential.

    Mersey Barrage

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will make a statement on progress being made towards the construction of a Mersey barrage.

    The Department and the Mersey Barrage Company have combined on an equal sharing basis to fund over £800,000 towards further studies into a Mersey barrage. I exchanged the relevant contract documents with the chairman of the Mersey Barrage Company at a ceremony in Liverpool on Monday 20 October.The principal objective of the studies will be to assess whether there is any overriding impediment to the construction of the barrage and to select a preferred line. The consulting managers appointed by the company are now in process of inviting tenders and letting contracts for the study of these and related topics affecting the estuary.

    Wiltshire (Oil Exploration)

    asked the Secretary of State for Energy if he will make a statement on the recent progress of exploration for oil in Wiltshire.

    There have been three recent exploration wells, two drilled in 1985, at Norton Ferris south-west of Warminster and at Netherhampton near Salisbury, and this year at Urchfont near Devizes. The results of the drilling are being evaluated.

    Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs

    South Africa

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what action was taken by Her Britannic Majesty's Government's delegation to the recent conference of the International Red Cross at Geneva in connection with the expulsion of the South African Government's delegation.

    The United Kingdom delegation emphasised that all states parties to the Geneva conventions had the right to attend the conference. When a vote was forced, the delegation voted against a motion to suspend the South African Government delegation for failing to observe the principles of the Red Cross and humanitarian law by pursuing its apartheid policy.

    Visas

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many officers were in post in embassies and consulates in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan to deal with the issuing of visas on 15 October.

    The number of officers dealing with long and short term visas in these posts on 15 October is as follows:

    Bangladesh

    Dhaka

    • 1 First Secretary
    • 3 Second Secretaries
    • 17 Entry Clearance Officers

    India

    New Delhi

    • 1 First Secretary
    • 5 Entry Clearance Officers

    Bombay

    • 1 Second Secretary
    • 7 Entry Clearance Officers

    Madras

    • 3 Entry Clearance Officers

    Calcutta

    • 1 Entry Clearance Officer

    Pakistan

    Islamabad

    • 1 First Secretary
    • 2 Second Secretaries
    • 17 Entry Clearance Officers

    Karachi

    • 4 Entry Clearance Officers

    Northern Ireland

    Unemployed Families

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he can estimate the number of children in unemployed families for the latest date possible in Northern Ireland.

    The information requested is not available in the form requested. However, on 12 December 1984 the number of children under 16 years in unemployed families receiving supplementary benefit was 76,500.

    Police Complaints Board

    asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he proposes to publish the triennial review report of the Police Complaints Board for Northern Ireland.

    Under article 11(6) of the Police (Northern Ireland) Order 1977, the Police Complaints Board for Northern Ireland is required to keep under review the working of part II of the order—Complaints Against the Police, and to make to the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland a report thereon at least once every three years after the coming into force of the article. The third review report of the Police Complaints Board for Northern Ireland has been made to me and as has been the practice with the two previous reports I have arranged for it to be published today and copies to be placed in the Libraries of both Houses.

    Trade And Industry

    British Overseas Trade Board

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will state (i) the gross financial resources in real terms available to the British Overseas Trade Board for each year since 1979 and (ii) the projections for the British Overseas Trade Board budget in real terms for the next five years.

    The following figures show gross and net expenditure by the British Overseas Trade Board in constant price terms:

    £ million (September 1979)
    YearGross expenditureNet expenditure
    1979–8025·721·2
    1980–8119·816·1
    1981–8219·215·2
    1982–8320·816·3
    1983–8420·515·3
    1984–85124·5118·7
    1985–8624·2217·1
    1986–8724·716·2
    1 Expenditure on publicity and promotion was transferred to the BOTB budget from the COI with effect from 1984–85. On a constant price basis the expenditure amounted to £1·5 million in 1984–85.
    2 Export Intelligence Service revenue was transferred to the BOTB budget from another DTI budget with effect from 1985–86. On a constant price basis this reduced net expenditure by £0·3 million in 1985–86.
    The level of the BOTB budget for the years 1987–88 to 1989–90 is being reviewed as part of the 1986 Public Expenditure Survey which will be completed shortly.

    Ault And Wiborg (Paint Factory)

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what representations he has received concerning the efforts of Berger to take over the Ault and Wiborg paint factory at Perivale; and if he will make a statement.

    I have received a number of representations from hon. Members and others about this proposed acquisition. They have been drawn to the attention of the Director General of Fair Trading, who is currently examining the proposal.

    Independent Television Companies

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what representations his Department has received suggesting technical, commercial and industrial advantage which would arise from a separation of the teletext service and subscription users group facilities from the Independent Television programme companies.

    My Department has not received any formal representations on this issue but is aware of the various suggestions which have been put forward concerning the use of teletext and subscription user group facilities.

    General Agreement On Tariffs And Trade

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement on the recent General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade made in Punta del Este.

    Contracting parties to the GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) met at ministerial level in Punta del Este, Uruguay, on 15 to 20 September. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry presided over meetings of European Community Ministers during the conference and I represented the United Kingdom.The contracting parties agreed unanimously to launch the eighth round of multilateral trade negotiations in GATT, to be known as the "Uruguay round". This launch is the result of three years' hard preparatory work. The success of the negotiations is vital to the preservation and strengthening of the world trading system.The negotiations are scheduled to be completed within four years. The agenda will cover trade not only in goods but also in agricultural products and services.The Ministerial declaration, a copy of which has been placed in the Libraries of both Houses, provides for discussion of all matters to which the Government attach importance.

    South Africa

    asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a further statement on the voluntary ban on new investment in South Africa to which Her Majesty's Government agreed at the Commonwealth Heads of Government review meeting in August; and if he is taking any further action in this regard.

    The member states of the EC have agreed that the measure will cover new direct investment in the RSA by natural or legal persons resident in any member state. In accordance with this and our undertaking at the Commonwealth Heads of Government review meeting, the British Government are taking action to dissuade United Kingdom firms from making new, direct investments and to ask all the companies concerned to comply fully with this measure.Under the terms of the intergovernmental decision agreed by the member states of the EC, new direct investment includes new acquisitions of share and loan capital of South African companies, and also includes loans and capital injections through inter-company and branch/head office accounts.Financial transactions and hank lending in support of normal trading activity are not included. Also excluded are investments in training, health and social sectors in line with the positive measures agreed in the EC last year and this.I believe that British industry, which has repeatedly supported calls for fundamental social and political reform in South Africa, is ready to play its part in helping to bring this about by non-violent means. Given the extent of existing United Kingdom investment in South Africa, wholehearted co-operation by British companies with the voluntary ban on new investment should have considerable impact.Meanwhile, if the South African Government were to take those steps for which we and our partners have called, in order to establish a process of dialogue across racial lines, we have made clear in the Commonwealth communiqué that we stand ready to review and, if appropriate, to rescind the measures we have adopted.

    Diplomatic Documents (Sale)

    asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he intends to take action to prohibit the sale of diplomatic passports, visas and honourary consulships by British-based companies.

    [pursuant to his reply, 27 October 1986, c. 34]: If the hon. Member will write to me, I shall consider the matter further.

    Scotland

    Cervical Cancer

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he has any plans to spend more money on advertising the availability of cervical cancer screening in Scotland; and if he will make a statement.

    A Scottish Health Service planning council working group has been reviewing the cervical cytology service in Scotland and will shortly be submitting its report. We shall consider its recomendations very carefully including any views it may express on the need to advertise this service.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the cost of cervical cancer screening in Scotland in the last financial year.

    Figures on the total cost of cervical cancer screening in Scotland are not available centrally.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many women have been screened for cervical cancer in Scotland in 1986.

    356,746 cervical smears were examined in Scotland in 1985, the latest year for which details are available. This figure includes repeat smears and does not represent the total number of women screened, for which figures are not available.

    Strathclyde Island Population

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what percentage of the island population in Strathclyde were born on the island on which they now live.

    I regret that the information is not available in the detail requested. The 1981 census of population asked for country of birth: the results showed that approximately 86 per cent. of the residents of islands in Strathclyde were born in Scotland.

    Mental Illness

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many patients were accommodated in mental illness hospitals in 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985.

    This information is as follows:

    Number of patients resident in menial illness hospitals in Scotland
    Numbers
    198015,766
    198116,103
    198215,678
    198315,631
    198415,536
    The figures for 1985 are not yet available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how much money was spent by each local authority in providing community care for those suffering from mental illness in 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many women were admitted to mental illness hospitals in 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985.

    This information is as follows:

    Number of women admitted to mental illness hospitals in Scotland
    1st admissionRe-admissionAll admissions
    19805,4568,80414,348
    19815,5769,07214,709
    19825,2128,18213,475
    19835,5459,23914,823
    19845,4119,40215,000
    The figures for 1985 are not yet available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what recent representations he has received concerning the extent and quality of community care for those patients discharged from mental illness hospitals.

    Representations and inquiries are received from time to time on the general subject of community care, but there have been no recent representations relating specifically to the care of persons discharged from hospital following treatment for mental illness.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how much money was made available by the Government for local authorities to provide for those suffering from mental illness in 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985.

    Rate support grant is not hypothecated to individual services; it is for local authorities to determine priorities within the resources available to them.

    Mental Health Hospitals

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how much money was spent on mental health hospitals in 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985.

    This information is published annually in "Scottish Health Service Costs", copies of which are available in the Library.

    Community Psychiatric Nursing Service

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what recent representations he has received regarding the community psychiatric nursing service.

    Geriatric Care Beds

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland how many beds were available for geriatric care in (a) public and (b) private sector hospitals in Scotland in each of the years 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984 and 1985.

    The number of beds available for geriatric care in NHS hospitals as at 30 September in each of the years in question was as follows:

    YearNumber of Available Beds
    19809,767
    19819,995
    198210,146

    Year

    Number of Available Beds

    198310,401
    198410,700
    198510,690

    Comparable information for private sector hospitals is not centrally available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what recent representations he has received about the number of beds available for geriatric care in Scotland.

    Only one representation about the number of beds available for geriatric care in Scotland has been received in the last six months.

    Scottish Institute For Adult And Continuing Education

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what funding his Department has provided for the Scottish Institute for Adult and Continuing Education for local development projects for the unemployed in each of the last three years.

    Adult Basic Education

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the level of funding by his Department for the Scottish adult basic education unit over each of the last three financial years; and what funds his Department is making available for adult basic education in the current year.

    Grants offered to the Scottish adult basic education unit for each of the last three years were as follows:

    YearRecurrent GrantSupplementary Grant
    1983–84£152,000£7,000
    1984–85£160,650
    1985–86£165,500
    From 1 April 1986 the work of the unit was integrated with that of the Scottish Community Education Council. The aggregate grant to the council for 1986–87 is £542,000, an overall increase of almost 4 per cent.

    Physical Education

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what are the unit costs at Jordanhill Scottish school of physical education as compared with Dunfermline college; what further costs to public funds will arise following the integration of physical education students at the Cramond site; and what financial appraisals were carried out before he announced his decision on 17 July.

    Centrally held unit cost figures for colleges of education are only available for complete institutions; for the 1985–86 financial year the net costs are £3,781 at Jordanhill college of education and £4,796 at Dunfermline college of physical education. I do not expect additional costs to the Exchequer to arise as a direct consequence of the integration of PE students at the Cramond site. The Scottish Education Department examined the financial consequences of various options for the future arrangements for PE training before my right hon. and learned Friend announced his decision on 17 July, in reaching which he had regard also to educational and accommodation factors.

    Rate Support Grant

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the percentage level of rate support grant made available to Inverclyde district council and Scotland overall in 1980 and at the latest date.

    [pursuant to his reply, 29 October 1986]: Rate support grant for Inverclyde was 47·1 per cent. of relevant expenditure, including loan charges in 1980–81 and 27·4 per cent. of budgeted relevant expenditure in 1986–87. The corresponding figures for Scotland are 57·6 per cent. for 1980–81 and 47 per cent. for 1986–87. These figures do not include specific grants which are included in the calculation of aggregate Exchequer grants. The grant figures used for 1986–87 are based on the Rate Support Grant (Scotland) (No. 4) Order 1985. No adjustment has been made for grant penalties, since they will be restored if authorities bring their expenditure down to guideline on outturn.

    Transport

    Safety Barriers (Motorways)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he is satisfied with the types of safety fencing currently used on motorways and other trunk roads, particularly in central reservations; if he has any plans to introduce concrete barriers on motorways on an experimental basis in the next 12 months; and if he will make a statement.

    I am generally satisfied with the types of safety fences used in the central reserves and verges of motorways and trunk roads and have no plans to introduce concrete barriers on an experimental basis. The Department has a programme of research and development of safety fences and barriers of different types, including concrete barriers. Satisfactory results may lead to changes in the future.

    Aircraft (Disabled People)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will set out the rules govening the proportion and seating position and seating positions of disabled passengers carried on scheduled flights.

    It is the Civil Aviation Authority which is responsible for air safety. There are no rules about the proportion of disabled passengers carried on scheduled flights. However, the CAA issues notices and other guidance to holders of air operators certificates on such matters as cabin crew training and the seating of handicappped and able-bodied passengers in relation to emergencies.

    Aircraft (Engines)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he has given any instructions to the Civil Aviation Authority with regard to extended twin-engined aircraft operations, about the guarantees required by the Authority to ensure that data on precautionary and enforced shutdowns is accurate and includes all such shutdowns as required under CAP 513.

    The Civil Aviation Authority is statutorily responsible for aviation safety and I do not give it instructions about it. The CAA's civil aviation publication 513 contains guidelines for the approval of extended range operations by United Kingdom-registered twin engined aircraft. Under article 85 of the Air Navigaton Order 1985 all precautionary and enforced shut-downs of engines on such aircraft must be reported to the authority. Civil Aviation publication 382 gives details of this procedure.

    SiteLocation of contraflowStart dateProgrammed completion date
    J14–15Northbound carriageway1 October 1986Mid November 1986
    J22–23Northbound carriageway6 October 198625 November 1986
    J27–28Southbound carriageway7 September 198616 November 1986
    J31–33Both carriagewaysMid October 1986End of January 1987

    Motorways (Maintenance)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will issue guidelines to motorway contractors asking them to ensure that all motorways keep open at least two lanes during maintenance work; and if he will make a statement.

    The Department's standards for traffic management at motorway maintenance sites already ensure that on three-lane motorways at least two lanes in each direction are kept open wherever possible. Reductions to one lane are permitted only as a last resort, and then we try to keep them in off-peak periods. Reductions to one lane are sometimes necessary on two-lane motorways in order to provide a safety zone between the traffic stream and the work site.

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport (1) if he will list the contracts and the number of personnel working on the M5 between junctions 21 and 23 on Saturday 25 October;(2) if he or one of his Ministerial colleagues will visit the M5 between junctions 21 and 23; and if he will take urgent action to open the M5 to two lanes between these two junctions;(3) if he will review the progress of maintenance work on the M5 between junctions 21 and 23; and who are the consulting engineers for this maintenance contract;(4) on what basis his Department gave permission for the reduction of the M5 to one lane between junctions 21 and 22, and 22 and 23, on Saturday 25 October.

    There are three separate maintenance operations currently in progress on the M5 between junctions 21 and 23. The larger works are the replacement of a 2 km length of the wearing surface of the inside lane between junctions 21 and 22. In addition two smaller works are in progress, similarly replacing the wearing course at the approaches to the bridges over the rivers Brue and Huntspill.In the interests of safety to both workmen and road users it is essential in each situation to close two lanes, leaving only one for traffic during working hours. The contractors are instructed, however, to open two lanes to

    M1 (Contraflow Systems)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport how many contraflow systems are working between London and Wakefield northbound and southbound; what are their locations; how long they will be operating; and on what estimated dates thay will be terminated.

    The information requested is as follows:traffic on ceasing work for the day. I am satisfied that the work, which is being supervised for my Department by Somerset county council, is being properly carried out. It is inevitable that there will be some delays to traffic. The contractors, Messrs Asfare and Roberts and Son, had 12 operatives including drivers working on the site on Saturday 25 October. This work is scheduled for completion by 5 November.

    Westminster Bridge

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what criteria he used in determining that the present pedestrian crossing on Westminster bridge road opposite Belvedere road requires special approval for its retention;(2) to whom the responsibility for switching on lights at the cycle facility on Westminster bridge road has been transferred following the abolition of the Greater London council;(3) what criteria he used in deciding to instruct the London borough of Lambeth to close the space in the centre island of Westminster bridge road opposite Belvedere road;(4) why he has instructed the traffic control systems unit to remove the cycle signals on Westminster bridge road at its junction with Belvedere road.

    All signalled pedestrian crossings in London and elsewhere that are not pelican crossings require my right hon. Friend's approval under the provisions of the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 1981. My right hon. Friend is also responsible for all traffic light signals in London. There is a difficult design problem still to be resolved about the appropriate pedestrian and cycle crossing facilities at the southern end of Westminster bridge, where Lambeth borough council became the highway authority last April. This has to be worked out between my Department, the traffic control systems unit and Lambeth council. The sole consideration in the Department's actions since the original authorisation was given has been to ensure that lives are not put at risk by the present incomplete state of the facility.

    A49 (Callow Hill)

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will indicate, in respect of the A49 trunk road rebuilding contract currently being executed at Callow hill, Herefordshire, whether there have been any alterations to the specification to that set out in the tender documents against which the contract was let; and whether he anticipates the contract will be completed on the schedule called for in the contract.

    There have been no major specification changes. There have been two minor changes to the method of working as set out in the tender documents:

  • (i) The rolled asphalt roadbase is being laid in three layers instead of two as originally specified. This enables earlier protection of the road sub-base to be provided.
  • (ii) The sequence of stockpiling excavated material has been modified to better suit the contractor's programme.
  • Both these variations have been agreed with the contractor with no increase in contractual cost. We cannot at this stage preclude the possibility of delay. No formal extension of contract has been granted so far.

    Uttoxeter Bypass

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport why he will not earmark specific funds for the construction of a bypass of Uttoxeter in the near future.

    It is for Staffordshire county council, as the local highway authority, to make a bid for capital funding of a bypass of Uttoxeter when it is ready to proceed with a scheme. At that stage it would be considered for support along with other schemes as part of the annual transportation policies and programme process. As I indicated in my reply on 24 October, Staffordshire county council is not yet in a position to make such a bid.

    Syrian Arab Airlines

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport whether he will ban flights to the United Kingdom by Syrian Arab Airlines.

    Flights of Syrian Arab Airlines have currently been discontinued. The Government are considering whether any further formal steps should be taken.

    Airport Rail Link, Manchester

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport what further information he has received about the prospects for a rail link to Manchester international airport; and if he will make a statement.

    I understand that the parties concerned with the proposed rail link have recently made considerable progress on a possible cost-sharing arrangement, but I have yet to see exactly what is proposed.

    Public Transport, London

    asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make it his practice to place a copy of the current working timetable of London Underground Ltd. and London Buses Ltd. in the Library.

    No. A wide range of current timetables for particular travel needs are issued by London Underground Ltd. and London Buses Ltd. and are readily available from bus and Underground stations. It is a matter for the Library to decide which of these it should acquire.

    National Finance

    Banking Industry

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) if he will place in the Library copies of the consultative papers he sent out to interested parties in the course of his discussions with the banking industry on the Leigh-Pemberton Committee's report, together with a list of the persons and institutions to which each of those papers was sent;(2) what consultations he had with interested parties before he published in his White Paper on Banking Supervision, Cmnd. 9695, the proposal that only institutions with £5 million paid up equity be allowed to use the word bank as part of their name; and if he will list the persons and institutions to whom he addressed requests for comment on this point.

    I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given by the Chancellor of the Exchequer to the hon. Member for Stafford (Mr. Cash) on 19 July 1985, col. 289. The consultative papers in question were sent to all institutions at that time authorised to take deposits under the Banking Act 1979; to major United Kingdom accounting firms; to a number of United Kingdom Government Departments and supervisory authorities in other countries; and to the following bodies:

    • The British Bankers Association
    • The Committee of London Clearing Bankers
    • The Committee of Scottish Clearing Bankers
    • The Finance Houses Association
    • The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
    • The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland
    • The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Scotland
    • The National Association of Security Dealers and Investment Managers
    • The Registry of Friendly Societies
    • The Securities and Investments Board
    • The Stock Exchange
    The Bank of England also invited representations from any other interested individuals, institutions or representative bodies. All institutions were invited to comment on all matters in the consultative papers. Copies of the consultative papers were placed in the House Library at the time they were issued. The proposal that only institutions with £5 million paid-up equity capital be allowed to use the word "bank" as part of their name was made in the light of representations received following the issue of the consultative papers.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish a list of the currently authorised deposit factors that fall outside the £5 million limit in paid-up equity which he now proposes to apply before allowing the use of the word "bank" as part of their name.

    The Government intend to bring forward as soon as practicable legislation to implement the proposals in the White Paper "Banking Supervision" (Cmnd. 9695), but I will write to my hon. Friend after the Bill is published.

    Unemployment

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make it his policy to include a forecast of the level of unemployment in 1987–88 in his next Budget.

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make it his policy to include a forecast of future levels of unemployment in his next Budget; and if he will make a statement.

    No. It has not been the practice of this or previous Governments to publish forecasts of unemployment.

    Chargeable Gains (Taxation)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will estimate the change in revenue in a full year if capital gains tax and corporation tax on chargeable gains were repealed and replaced by a charge to income tax and corporation tax, respectively, on gains computed in a like manner, on assets disposed of within one year of acquisition.

    Revenue from capital gains tax and from corporation tax on chargeable gains would be reduced by more than 90 per cent.

    Trustee Savings Bank

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what information he has as to the number and size of shareholdings in the Trustee Savings Bank immediately following flotation.

    Estimates of take-up of supplementary benefit for 1983
    Total likely to be entitled at any one timeProportion receiving benefit at that timeNumber eligible but not receiving benefitEstimated benefit unclaimedAverage weekly amount
    ThousandsPer cent.Thousands£ million per annum£
    (i) Pensioners12,240677501303·40
    (ii) Non-pensioners—total23,1408355043015·30
    (iii) Sick and disabled24080503010·30
    (iv) Unemployed2,2508142035015·90
    (v) One-parent families not included in (iii) and (iv)48091403012·70
    Total for all groups5,380761,2905708·40
    1 The estimates shown for pensioners are uncertain as explained under the heading "pensioners".
    2 This total is slightly greater than the sum of lines (iii), (iv) and (v) because it includes a small residual group of miscellaneous cases.
    Estimates of take-up of supplementary benefit for 1981
    Total likely to be entitled at any one timeProportion receiving benefit at that timeNumber eligible but not receiving benefitEstimated benefit unclaimedAverage weekly amount
    ThousandsPer cent.Thousands£ million per annum£
    (i) Pensioners12,480678102105·00
    (ii) Non-pensioners-total22,3507558055018·10
    (iii) Sick and disabled290671007014·30
    (iv) Unemployed1,5807540041019·60
    (v) One-parent families not included in (iii) and (iv)40088504015·30

    Information is given in a press release, issued on 29 September by Lazard Brothers and Co. Ltd. on behalf of the Trustee Savings Bank central board, a copy of which is in the Library of the House.

    Privatisation

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the total cost of pre-flotation publicity for each of the concerns privatised by the Government since 1979.

    Social Services

    Benefits

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish the latest take-up estimates for supplementary benefit and one-parent benefit.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people eligible for supplementary benefit do not claim it.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish the estimated take-up or supplementary benefit derived from the 1983 family expenditure survey on the same basis as his reply of 30 November 1983, Official Report, column 532, to the hon. Member for Mitcham and Morden (Mrs. Rumbold.)

    The figures for supplementary benefit are shown in the tables. These are derived from the 1983 family expenditure survey and are compared with the 1981 figures. Figures for one-parent benefit will be provided shortly.

    Total likely to be entitled at any one time

    Proportion receiving benefit at that time

    Number eligible but not receiving benefit

    Estimated benefit unclaimed

    Average weekly amount

    Thousands

    Per cent.

    Thousands

    £ million per annum

    £

    Total for all groups4,820711,39076010·50

    1 The estimates shown for pensioners are uncertain as explained under the heading "pensioners".

    2 This total is slightly greater than the sum of lines (iii), (iv) and (v) because it includes a small residual group of miscellaneous cases.

    Notes

  • 1. Estimates of those with an unclaimed entitlement are based on DHSS analysis of income and other information recorded by respondents to the family expenditure survey (FES). The estimates of those in receipt are derived from the supplementary benefit annual and quarterly statistical enquiries.
  • 2. The estimates relate only to people living in private households; people in institutions are not sampled by the FES.
  • 3. Estimates are subject to sampling error, particularly those based on the FES.
  • 4. Calculation of entitlement to supplementary benefit is based on the appropriate scale rates plus age-related heating additions and also in 1983 other heating additions which can be identified from FES information.
  • 5. For 1981 calculation of entitlement included housing costs, except where the family would have been better off claiming housing rebates. For 1983 rent and rates are excluded to take account of the introduction of housing benefit which began in November 1982.
  • 6. In 1981 FES participants were not asked about the amount of capital they had, only about income received from capital, and assumptions had to be made from this information about such capital holdings. In 1983 additional questions were asked about some forms of capital from which no income was received e.g. National Savings Certificates.
  • 7. The estimates for 1983 exclude housing benefit supplement recipients and entitled non-recipients, for which no reliable estimates can be made because of the transitional arrangements which operated in several parts of the country following the introduction of housing benefit.
  • Comparisons between 1981 and 1983

    In 1981 supplementary benefit requirements included rent and domestic rates, but ceased to do so with the introduction of housing benefit, partially from November 1982 and fully from April 1983. Supplementary benefit householders then received housing benefit to cover such housing costs. For this reason no direct comparison can be made between the 1981 and 1983 take-up estimates (see notes 5 and 7 to the tables).

    Amounts of benefit unclaimed

    Take up increases as the amount of entitlement increases. In 1983 the estimated proportion of benefit taken up was 89 per cent., and thus higher than the proportion of those entitled at any one time who actually claimed-76 per cent. The estimated proportion of benefit taken-up by the different groups was as follows:

    Estimated proportion of benefit taken up

    per cent.

    (i)Pensioners79
    (ii)Non-pensioners—total90
    (iii)Sick and disabled89
    (iv)Unemployed89
    (v)One-parent families not included in (iii) and (iv)97

    Pensioners

    The 1983 take-up estimate for pensioners is uncertain because of apparent deficiencies in the information obtained by FES from pensioner respondents. Comparison between figures based on FES data and the supplementary benefit annual and quarterly statistics indicate that a substantial number of FES pensioner respondents failed to report that they were receiving supplementary benefit. The FES figures have therefore been adjusted to make an allowance for this, but the adjustment must to some extent be speculative. The indications are that the FES figures fail to identify receipt of supplementary benefit by some 350,000 pensioners. For technical reasons, partly to do with lack of precision in such a complex survey as FES, the estimate of entitled non-recipients could not just be reduced by 350,000. Statisticians have adjusted the figures by reducing the estimated number of entitled non-recipients by 160,000. A technical note explaining this adjustment is being placed in the Library. There must be some doubt whether the estimate that 67 per cent. of pensioners were claiming 79 per cent. of their entitlement to supplementary benefit is correct. The indications are, however, that the average entitlement of non-claiming pensioners is small. £3·40 a week, including some 60 per cent. entitled to less than £3.

    Non-pensioners

    In 1983 it is estimated that at one time 83 per cent. of non-pensioners claimed 90 per cent. of their supplementary benefit entitlement. It is notable that 91 per cent. of one-parent families claimed 97 per cent. of their entitlement. It must be doubtful to what extent take-up by this group could be improved. The reasons for non take-up are complex. Analysis of the characteristics of unemployed people who had not taken up their entitlement to supplementary benefit shows that a high proportion, about 60 per cent., were living in other people's households, and in the majority the income of the household as a whole was well above supplementary benefit levels. Take-up increased to 90 per cent. for those unemployed more than three months. The information on which the take-up figures is based is given by FES respondents at one point of time. Those who have not taken up their entitlement at that point of time may do so at another time.

    Measures to Promote Take-up

    We continue to promote take-up by issuing a claim form to all retirement pensioners and widows, all unemployed claimants and all sickness benefit, invalidity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants. We co-operate at local level with well organised take-up campaigns mounted by local authorities. A postal claim form procedure has been introduced for all claimants to make it easier and more convenient for them to claim if they prefer not to be interviewed about their claim in a social security office or at home.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will make a statement about the latest figures for the take up of benefits by people aged 16 to 25 years.

    [pursuant to the reply, 21 October 1986, c. 859]: Estimates of the take-up of housing benefit and family income supplement for 16 to 25 year olds are not practicable because of the limited number of sample cases available in the family expenditure survey. However, take-up of supplementary benefit for this age group was 80 per cent. in 1983.

    Supplementary Benefit

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what has been the percentage change in the amount paid out under regulation 9, Supplementary Benefit Regulations to people in private residential care, from (a) 1979 to (b) the latest estimated figures that are available.

    Information is not available in the form requested. Annual supplementary benfit expenditure on residents in private and voluntary residential care homes and nursing homes who are not sponsored by a local authority has increased from £10 million in 1979 to £200 million in 1984, the last year for which information is available.

    (Thousands)
    197919811983
    No.Per cent.No.Per cent.No.Per cent.
    Number of supplementary benefit assessment units living in Scotland:
    In receipt of Supp B or HBS290123001237014
    Not in receipt of Supp B or FIBS with RNR <140 (includes RNR <100)380165102066025
    Of which: not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR <100110511052208
    Number of persons living in Scotland:
    In receipt of Supp B or HBS4509480961013
    Not in receipt of Supp B or FIBS with RNR <140 (includes RNR < 100)620131,030201,08023
    Of which: not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR <100170416033006

    Notes:

    (i) The Scottish samples have been translated into population estimates using factors based on data for Great Britain as a whole. Since the Family Expenditure Survey response rate may differ from that for Great Britain as a whole and since the extent of the difference may vary from one year to another, it follows that Scottish estimates may be more vulnerable to grossing error than data for Great Britain as a whole. Taken together, these two sources of statistical error make both trends and levels in the Scottish estimates peculiarly difficult to interpret. These statistical problems will be considered as a part of the Low Income Technical Review.

    (ii) The assumptions on which these estimates are based are the same as those contained in the "Low Income Families—1983" tables lodged in the Library of the House.

    (iii) RNR = Relative net resources. For a full definition of this term see paragraphs 4 and 5 of "Low Income Families—1983".

    (iv) HBS = housing benefit supplement.

    (v) A supplementary benefit assessment unit is usually either a single person or a couple with their dependent children if they have any. Dependent children are those aged less than 16 or 19 if still in full-time non-advanced education.

    (vi) "Other" is composed of single-parents, full-time students, full-time workers away from work on part or no pay, those of non-pension age not working and not seeking work and the sick and disabled.

    (vii) Classifications by employment status and assessment type are mutually exclusive and non-additive.

    (viii) "*" denotes a figure of less than 10,000.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people were living in families below supplementary benefit level, on supplementary benefit, with incomes up to 140 per cent. of supplementary benefit, classified by both employment status and family type in 1983 on the latest basis and on a basis comparable with 1981 and 1979; and, in each case, what proportion of the total population in each category they represent.

    Industrial Diseases

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when the Government were last advised on the prescription of industrial diseases by the Industrial Injuries Advisory Council; and if he will make a statement.

    We last received advice from the Industrial Injuries Advisory Council earlier this year when it submitted its report on occupational lung cancer. Arrangements are being made to publish this report before the end of the year.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish a table showing the number and percentage of households and persons in Scotland below, at, or up to 40 per cent. above supplementary benefit level in 1979, 1981 and 1983.

    [pursuant to his reply, 6 May 1986, c. 73]: Estimates are provided in the tables. All of these estimates are subject to sampling error, but the Scottish estimates of low income assessment units that are not receiving supplementary benefit are particularly prone to this statistical problem. This is because of the small number of sample cases available in the Family Expenditure Survey.

    Aids

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether a decision has yet been reached about future stages of the acquired immune deficiency syndrome information campaign; and whether a television advertising campaign and a leaflet for households will be included.

    I refer the hon. Member to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Stockport (Mr. Favell) on 28 October.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what assessment he has made of the impact of the latest publicity campaign about acquired immune deficiency syndrome (a) generally and (b) on school-children.

    I refer my hon. Friend to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Bury, South (Mr. Sumberg) on 21 October at column 858.

    Cervical Screening

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will reduce the recommended interval for screening of women for cervical cancer from five years to three years; what would be the additional cost involved; and if he will make a statement.

    The recommended interval for cervical cancer screening is currently under review. We will announce the outcome of that review in due course.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will reduce the period within which health authorities must instal computerised call and recall systems for cervical cancer screening from two years to one year; what would be the additional cost involved; and if he will make a statement.

    All health authorities in England have reported that they plan to implement computerised call and recall systems for cervical cancer screening within the next seventeen months, that is no later than March 1988. This is an ambitious but realistic timetable. There would be severe practical difficulties, for example in staff recruitment and training, in any attempt at further acceleration of the timetable.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will issue guidance to procure the issue of the Lerner spatula within the National Health Service for cervical smear tests in place of the present Ayre spatula.

    We are aware of suggestions that various spatulas, one of which is the Lerner spatula, may be more effective than the Ayre spatula for taking cervical smears. We shall he asking the independent expert committee on gynaecological cytology for their advice.

    Skoal Bandits

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when he intends to conclude an agreement with the manufacturers of Skoal bandits enabling a health warning to be printed on the containers of this product; and if he will make a statement.

    General Practice (Ancillary Staff)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) what information he has concerning the

    (a)(b)(c)(d)
    Value in April 1955 money termsColumn (a) expressed at July 1986 prices1Value in July 1986 money termsColumn (c) as Index Column (b) = 100
    Comparative levels of Social Security Benefits and Values of Tax Allowance to Basic Rate Taxvavers
    £££
    Married couple retirement pension (per week)3·2529·4561·95210·4
    Single person tax allowance (per annum)2274·002,482·502,335·0094·1
    Married couple tax allowance (per annum)2374·003,388·553,655·00107·9
    Family Allowance 1 Child Benefit plus Child Tax Allowances (where appropriate) for a married couple plus 2 children aged under 11

    number of ancillary staff who are employed by doctors in general practice and who are the spouse or other relation of the doctor concerned;

    (2) what information he has concerning the average reimbursement to doctors in general practice for ancillary staff to whom they are related; and how that average reimbursement compares to that which is paid on average for unrelated staff;

    (3) if he will introduce legislation to ensure that equal payments are made for the ancillary staff of doctors in general practice regardless of whether they are relations of the doctor or not; and if he will make a statement;

    (4) what recent discussions and correspondence have been entered into by his Department with interested parties concerning payments for ancillary workers who are related to doctors in general practice.

    In 1984–85, the latest year for which figures are available, 282 related ancillary staff were employed at some stage during that year. The allowance currently payable to practitioners for employing related staff is £2,005 per annum, provided such staff work not less than 19 hours a week.We have no centrally held information about hours worked by related ancillary staff, so it is difficult to make valid comparisons between the allowances paid to doctors in respect of their related and unrelated staff. However the fact that a "pay differential" exists is acknowledged. Indeed my predecessor met representatives of the General Medical Services Committee of the BMA and of the Doctors' Wives Association to discuss the matter on 19 February 1986. It was agreed that the Department, in conjunction with the GMSC, should draw up detailed proposals for reimbursing doctors for their related ancillary staff in the same way as unrelated staff, provided this could be done with reasonable safeguards against abuse and at no extra cost to the National Health Service. The GM SC and the Doctors' Wives Association accepted that proposals would be drawn up subject to these constraints. On 25 June 1986 officials wrote to the GMSC with proposals and we await their response.

    Benefits And Allowances

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will update to July 1986, at assumed July 1986 prices, the information on the value of benefits and allowances provided in the reply of 23 December 1982, Official Report, column 690, to the hon. Member for Eltham (Mr. Bottomley).

    (a)

    (b)

    (c)

    (d)

    Value in April 1955 money terms

    Column (a) expressed at July 1986 prices

    1

    Value in July 1986 money terms

    Column (c) as Index Column (b) = 100

    In work (per week)31·1110·0614·20141·2
    Sick (per week)41·15510·4414·2013·60
    Standard rate taxpayer1·90617 2114·2082·5

    1 Based on the movement in the General Index of Retail Prices.

    2 Tax allowances available to all earners in 1955 comprised three elements; the personal allowance, national insurance relief and earned income relief, and all are included. Earned income relief is that for average earnings.

    3 In respect of average earnings of £1087. Estimates of average earnings have been obtained by interpolation between October estimates, using the seasonally adjusted monthly index of average earnings (older series) published by the Department of Employment.

    4 Includes dependency allowance for children.

    5 Rates as at May 1955, when Sickness Benefit was increased. Real value at July 1986 (Column (b) of table) calculated from May 1955 base.

    6 Child tax allowance for the family illustrated would have been £200 per annum in 1955. It has been assumed that the family's income subject to tax is more than £200 below the top of the standard rate tax band.

    Mobility Allowance

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will be introducing legislation to allow recipients of the mobility allowance to retain it beyond the age of 75 years.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many applications for mobility allowance were made in Scotland in 1985; of these how many were (i) granted and (ii) refused; of the claimants whose applications were refused how many subsequently appealed to the medical boards; in how many of these cases the original refusal was overturned; and in how many cases a refusal by a medical board was subsequently overturned by the Medical Appeals Tribunal.

    I regret that this information can be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

    Invalid Care Allowance

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many married women have now claimed invalid care allowance following his decision to extend it to them; what steps he is taking to ensure that all married women entitled to this benefit will have entered their claim before the end of the year; and if he will make a statement.

    A total of around 75,000 married and cohabiting women have claimed invalid care allowance, 60,000 of these claims have been made since my right hon. Friend's announcement on 23 June at column 21. We have sent individual letters to some 400,000 attendance allowance beneficiaries, asking them to pass on details of the extension to their carer. In addition there has been a national press campaign in newspapers and journals, including women's magazines. All the publicity has explained the ability to claim back to 22 December 1984 if the claim is received in the Department by 31 December 1986.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what is his estimate of the level of the earnings limit for the invalid care allowance at April 1987 had it risen in line with changes to the retail price index since it was last increased in November 1982.

    British Council Of Organisations Of Disabled People

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what assistance his Department gives to the British Council of Organisations of Disabled People; what his plans are for any future assistance; and if he will make a statement.

    The British Council of Organisations of Disabled People is currently in receipt of a two year grant from the Department for the years 1985–86 and 1986–87 of £9,000 and £10,000 respectively towards their central costs in establishing a development worker post. We have received an application from BCODP for a grant towards their international activities and towards a proposed meeting of the World Council of the Disabled People's International in the United Kingdom in 1987. These applications are currently being considered.

    Local Authorities (Ministerial Meetings)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will reconsider his practice of agreeing to meet only one representative of local authority social services committees in those local authorities where there is no overall majority; and if he will make a statement.

    Our practice is to hold informal meetings about three times a year with Chairmen of Social Services Committees and Directors of Social Services with the aim of meeting representatives of every local authority over a period of two years. The invitations are addressed to chairmen and it is for them to decide if they wish to send a substitute. We value this opportunity to exchange views on personal social services issues with a wide range of authorities and we would not wish to make changes which would reduce their informality or prolong the rotation period beyond two years.

    Housing Benefit

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish from the 1983 family expenditure survey (a) the number and percentage of those eligible claiming certificated, and standard housing benefit and housing benefit supplement, (b) the total amount of benefit unclaimed and (c) the average weekly amount of benefit unclaimed broken down according to the different groups of beneficiaries.

    The 1983 family expenditure survey data are not regarded as reliable in respect of estimates of the take-up of housing benefit, as the survey was carried out in the same year as the changeover to the new scheme. The first take-up estimates of housing benefit are expected shortly, however, based on analysis of data from the 1984 family expenditure survey.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what has been the rent and rate increase each year since 1982; by how much the housing benefits needs allowance has been increased in each of these years, taking account of his statement of 22nd October; how many persons have lost each year that the the former has exceeded the latter; what was the total saving; what was the average individual loss and how many lost more than: (a) £1, (b) £2, and (c) £3 per week.

    I think there may be a misunderstanding underlying the hon. Member's question. Increases in rent and rate levels are reflected in standard housing benefit entitlement in two ways. 60 per cent. of the claimant's actual rent and rates are reflected automatically in the benefit calculation, and this has never been altered. In addition, 40 per cent. of the national average rents and rates were reflected in the needs allowances under the traditional uprating formula which was used each year from November 1982 to November 1985 inclusive. For last July's interim uprating it was not possible to use the traditional formula, as was explained at the time, because the measurement period for the uprating did not include the month of April when rents and rates normally increase. The approach used for next April's uprating, together with details of the effects, were explained fully in my right hon. Friend's statement to the House, and subsequent exchanges, on 22 October.

    Family Income Supplement

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish from the 1983 family expenditure survey (a) the number of those eligible claiming family income supplement, (b) the total amount of benefit unclaimed and (c) the average weekly amount of benefit unclaimed broken down into one and two parent families.

    An analysis of the data derived from the 1983 and 1984 family expenditure surveys in relation to take-up of family income supplement is almost complete. I hope to announce the results very shortly.

    Heart Pacemakers

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) whether he will ask for a report from Leeds western health authority on the provision of heart pacemakers; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he will ask for a report from the Yorkshire regional health authority on the provision of heart pacemakers in Leeds Western district health authority; and if he will make a statement.

    This is a matter for the Yorkshire regional health authority. May I suggest therefore that the hon. Member writes to the regional health authority chairman for the information he requires.

    Nhs (Beds)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish in the Official Report the number of beds available in the National Health Service at the present time; and how this compares with 1979.

    In 1985, the latest year for which information is available centrally, the average daily number of available beds in National Health Service hospitals in England was 325,487. The corresponding figure for 1979 was 361,670. The number of in-patient cases treated per available bed per year increased from 14·9 to 19·5 between 1979 and 1985. The number of inpatient cases treated in 1979 was 5,400,120 compared with 6,353,812 in 1985.

    J E Hanger And Co (Dispute)

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will list and give the dates of approaches made by Ministers and officials respectively, to J. E. Hanger and Co. since 16 September about the current lock-out, together with the company's response in each case.

    Under my direction officials in the Department's headquarters and in the Department's artificial limb and appliance centres have been in daily contact with J. E. Hanger and Co. Ltd. centrally and locally since the dispute at the Roehampton works began. Oral and written requests have been put to the management of the company from the first week enquiring what action the company were taking to maintain supply. Hanger management has not been prepared to go further than to make general assurances that they were making strenuous efforts to maintain the service.As far as patients are concerned, however, co-operation between the Department's artificial limb and appliance centre staff and local Hanger branch management is very good. All urgent cases drawn to the attention of the company have been and are being dealt with expeditiously.

    Low Income Families

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he will update in the Official Report the information on the income level of poorer households provided in his reply of 24 October 1983 to the hon. Member for Dundee, West (Mr. Ross) Official Report column 51, as soon as the 1983 low income families tables are placed in the Library;(2) how many people in Scotland in 1983 were (i) below, (ii) at and (iii) up to 140 per cent. of the supplementary benefit level on the latest basis and on a basis comparable with 1979 and 1981; what percentage of the total population they represent in each case; what his estimate is of the number of children living in such households in each case; and what percentage of total children they represent in each case;(3) how many children in Scotland were living in families below supplementary benefit level, on supplementary benefit, and with incomes up to 140 per cent. of supplementary benefit level, classified by employment status; whether they were in one or two parent families in 1983 on the latest basis and on a basis comparable with 1981 and 1979; and what proportion these children made up of the total number of children.

    [pursuant to his replies, 17 March 1986 c65, and 21 July 1986 c 79–80 and c 89]: Estimates are provided in the tables. All of these estimates are subject to sampling error, but the Scottish estimates of low income assessment

    Table 1
    Numbers of supplementary benefit assessment units (with or without children):—
    thousands
    1983Number of Unitsper cent. of all UnitsNumber of children
    Great Britain
    In receipt of Supp B or HBS3,640131,630
    Not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR < 140 (includes RNR < 100)5,740212,250
    of which: Not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR < 1001,8807400
    Scotland
    In receipt of Supp B or HBS37014180
    Not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR < 140 (includes RNR < 100)66025220
    of which: Not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR < 100220840
    Table 2
    Number of persons living in Scotland
    thousands
    1979per cent. Of total population1981per cent. of total population1983per cent. of total population
    In receipt of Supp B or HBS4509480961013
    Not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR < 140 (includes RNR < 100)620131,030201,08023
    of which: Not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR < 100)170416033006
    Table 3
    Number of children living in supplementary benefit assessment units in Scotland:—
    thousands
    Where the head is:
    In full-time workUnemployedOther1 parent familyone of a couplepercentage of all children
    1979
    In receipt of Supp B or HBS6050n/an/a8
    Not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR < 140 (includes RNR < 100)40204020808
    Of which: Not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR < 100**2010102
    1981
    In receipt of Supp B or HBS9060n/an/a11
    Not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR < 140 (includes RNR < 100)20040504025021
    Of which: Not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR < 100*10**101
    1983
    In receipt of Supp B or HBS9090808016
    Not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR < 140 (includes RNR < 100)16020402019020
    Of which: Not in receipt of Supp B or HBS with RNR < 1003010**303

    Notes:

    (i) The Scottish samples have been translated into population estimates using factors based on data for Great Britain as a whole. Since the Family Expenditure Survey response rate may differ from that for Great Britain as a whole and since the extent of the difference may vary from one year to another, it follows that Scottish estimates may be more vulnerable to grossing error than data for Great Britain as a whole. Taken together, these two sources of statistical error make both trends and levels in the Scottish estimates peculiarly difficult to interpret. These statistical problems will be considered as a part of the Low Income Technical Review.

    (ii) The assumptions on which these estimates are based are the same as those contained in the "Low Income Families—1983" tables lodged in the Library of the House.

    units that are not receiving supplementary benefit arc particularly prone to this statistical problem. This is because of the small number of sample cases available in the family expenditure survey.

    (iii) RNR = relative net resources. For a full definition of this term see paragraphs 4 and 5 of "Low Income Families—1983".

    (iv) HBS = housing benefit supplement.

    (v) A supplementary benefit assessment unit is usually either a single person or a couple with their dependent children if they have any. Dependent children are those aged less than 16 or 16 to 19 if still in full-time non-advanced education.

    (vi) "Other" is composed of single-parents, full-time students, full-time workers away from work on part or no sick pay, those of non-pension age not working and not seeking work and the sick and disabled.

    (vii) Classifications by employment status and assessment type are mutually exclusive and non-additive.

    (viii) "*" denotes a figure of less than 10,000.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he will publish a table showing for 1983 (a) the numbers of families with one, two, three, four or more children living below, at, and up to 140 per cent. of the supplementary benefit level on the latest basis and a basis comparable with 1981 and 1979, (b) how many of these families were in work or out of work and (c) the total number of families with one, two, three, four or more children, on the same basis as his reply of 16 May 1985 to the hon. Member for Thurrock, Official Report, column 224;(2) if he will provide a breakdown from the low income families 1983 table of the main reasons for people falling below the supplementary benefit level on the same basis as his reply of 14 December 1983 to the hon. Member for Kensington (Sir B. Rhys Williams)

    Official Report, column 517;

    (3) how many children were living in families below supplementary benefit level, on supplementary benefit, with incomes up to 140 per cent. of supplementary benefit level, classified by employment status, and whether they were in one or two-parent families in 1983 on the latest

    Number of Supplementary Benefit Assessment Units with children in Great Britain

    Thousands

    Thousands

    1979

    1 or 2 children

    1

    3 or more children

    In receipt of Supp B
    Head in FTW
    Head not in work360120
    Not in receipt of Supp B with RNR <100
    Head in FTW7020
    Head not in work6010
    Not in receipt of Supp B with RNR <140
    Head in FTW310170
    Head not in work18040

    1981

    1 child

    2 children

    3 children

    4+ children

    In receipt of Supp B
    Head in FTW
    Head not in work34026013070
    Not in receipt of Supp B with RNR <100
    Head in FTW30603010
    Head not in work60402010
    Not in receipt of Supp B with RNR <140
    Head in FTW15032014070
    Head not in work50704020

    1983

    In receipt of Supp B
    Head in FTW
    Head not in work42032014070
    Not in receipt of Supp B with RNR <100

    basis and on a basis comparable with 1981 and 1979; and what proportion these children make up of the total number of children.

    [pursuant to his reply, 18 July 1986, c. 665–66]: Estimates are provided in the tables. Amongst those supplementary benefit assessment units that are not in receipt of supplementary benefit with incomes below supplementary benefit level, the majority of those that are entitled to supplementary benefit or housing benefit supplement are pensioners failing to claim small amounts. Of the non pensioner minority within this group a significant number are living in wider relatively well-off households. Of those that are in full time work or self employed, 140,000 are single adults, 40,000 are couples without children and 110,000 are couples with children. Of these couples with children, some 60,000 would not have incomes below supplementary benefit level if they had claimed their entitlement to family income supplement. Those with capital in excess of the prescribed supplementary benefit limit have at least £3,000 available to them and thus have the means of support for day to day living. About 80 per cent. of those unoccupied for no apparent reason and who are required to be available for work are single persons without children.

    Thousands

    Thousands

    Head in FTW30303020
    Head not in work40301010
    Not in receipt of Supp B with RNR < 140
    Head in FTW22034020070
    Head not in work100702020

    1 A more detailed sub-classification by numbers of children cannot be provided without incurring excessive costs.

    Total number of families with children in Great Britain

    1 child

    2 children

    3 children

    4+ children

    19792,8752,978993344
    19812,9202,970940300
    19832,9002,900880270

    Supplementary Benefit Assessment Units not in receipt of supplementary benefit with incomes below supplementary benefit level analysed by benefit entitlement status—Great Britain 1983

    Thousands

    Total number apparently entitled to supplementary benefit or housing benefit supplement but not claiming:1,120

    Number of children living in Supplementary Benefit Assessment Units In Great Britain

    Thousands

    Where the head is

    In full-time work

    Unemployed

    Sick or disabled

    Other

    One parent

    One of a couple

    Percentage of all children

    1979

    In receipt of Supplementary Benefit3401004205803107
    Not in receipt of Supplementary Benefit with RNR < 100140402090602302
    Not in receipt of Supplementary Benefit with RNR < 1409601201402502001,28011

    1981

    In receipt of Supplementary Benefit650904206205409
    Not in receipt of Supplementary Benefit with RNR < 100210150301401104204
    Not in receipt of Supplementary Benefit with RNR < 1401,4603902103503002,12019

    1983

    In receipt of Supplementary Benefit9809054077086013
    Not in receipt of Supplementary Benefit with RNR < 10016012020100503503
    Not in receipt of Supplementary Benefit with RNR < 1401,4403101303602102,04018

    Notes:

    (i) The assumptions on which these estimates are based are the same as those contained in the "Low Income Families—1983" tables lodged in the Library of the House. Due to rounding the sum of the components may not equal the total.

    (ii) RNR = relative net resources. For a full definition of this term see paragraphs 4 and 5 of the notes of "Low Income Families—1983".

    (iii) FTW = full-time work.

    (iv) A supplementary benefit assessment unit is usually either a single person or a couple with their dependent children if they have any. Dependent children are those aged less than 16 or 16 to 19 if still in full-time non-advanced education.

    (v) Classification by employment status and assessment unit are mutually exclusive and non-additive.

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he can estimate, following the publication of the low income family tables for 1983, to what level (a) family income supplement and (b) child benefit would need to be raised to ensure that all working families with children have an income above the

    Thousands

    Total whose income is below supplementary benefit level but who are not eligible:
    (i) Full-time work or self employed290
    (ii) Those with capital in excess of prescribed limits200
    (iii) Those unoccupied for no apparent reason who are required to be available for work270

    supplementary benefit entitlement, on the same basis as his reply of 30 July 1984 to the hon. Member for Birkenhead (Mr. Field) Official Report, column 109.

    [pursuant to his reply, 21 July 1986, c. 79–80]:In 1983, around 110,000 full time working assessment units with children has net resources below supplementary benefit level. Some 60,000 of these had an unclaimed entitlement to family income supplement or standard housing benefit. In most cases claim to these entitlements would have raised their net resources above supplementary benefit level. If all entitlements to family income supplement and housing benefit were claimed, then it would be possible to raise the net resources of almost 90 per cent. of the total number of assessment units to above the supplementary benefit level by (a) increasing child benefit by 40 per cent. or (b) increasing the family income supplement prescribed amounts by 30 per cent. If however claimed entitlements to family income supplement and housing benefit remained at present proportions then raising the family income supplement prescribed amounts would have only a negligible effect on the numbers below supplementary benefit level. Raising child benefit by 200 per cent. would raise the net resources of 90 per cent. of assessment units above supplementary benefit levels.

    Supplementary Benefit

    asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he will give the numbers of people receiving supplementary benefit in each of the 36 metropolitan districts for each year from 1979 to 1986;(2) if he will give the numbers receiving supplementary benefits per thousand head of population in each of the 36 metropolitan districts for each year from 1979 to 1986;(3) if he will list the numbers of children in each of the 36 metropolitan districts who are dependent upon supplementary benefit claimants for each year from 1979 to 1986;(4) if he will list the numbers of children dependent upon people receiving supplementary benefit per thousand head of population in each of the metropolitan districts for each year from 1979 to 1986.

    [pursuant to the reply, 22 October 1986, c. 903–4]: Information to enable a breakdown of supplementary benefit cases by metropolitan district area began to be collected only in 1981. The available information is given in the four tables:

    Table 1. Claimants receiving supplementary benefit
    Estimated numbers (thousands)
    Metropolitan districts19811982198319841985
    Greater Manchester
    Bolton2024242725
    Bury1112131312
    Manchester5867688277
    Oldham1517192121
    Rochdale1720212121
    Salford2327273131
    Stockport1619202321
    Tameside1720202223
    Trafford1416171716
    Wigan2024262830
    Merseyside
    Knowsley2326272628
    Liverpool7079838989
    St. Helens1416171918
    Sefton2427283032
    Wirral2833353738
    South Yorkshire
    Barnsley1416182120
    Doncaster1923252928
    Rotherham1721232425

    Metropolitan districts

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1984

    1985

    Sheffield4655606464

    Tyne and Wear

    Gateshead2023252726
    Newcastle3033373840
    North Tyneside1720202423
    South Tyneside1720212224
    Sunderland2834354040

    West Midlands

    Birmingham98116124140137
    Coventry2733353738
    Dudley2126272930
    Sandwell2836393939
    Solihull911131013
    Walsall2026282828
    Wolverhampton2329313234

    West Yorkshire

    Bradford3844474749
    Calderdale1315161716
    Kirklees2427303129
    Leeds5966686969
    Wakefield1922232526

    Table 2. Claimants receiving supplementary benefit per 1,000 head of population

    Estimated numbers

    Metropolitan districts

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1984

    1985

    Greater Manchester

    Bolton78909310296
    Bury6070727872
    Manchester125145150180171
    Oldham6978869698
    Rochdale8394101102103
    Salford94110111127131
    Stockport5564697872
    Tameside789392104106
    Trafford6372778072
    Wigan6678849397

    Merseyside

    Knowsley130149156156169
    Liverpool136154164179182
    St. Helens75869210294
    Sefton799193100107
    Wirral8397102110113

    South Yorkshire

    Barnsley6272789292
    Doncaster6581899599
    Rotherham68818710098
    Sheffield85101111119118

    Tyne and Wear

    Gateshead95110121129127
    Newcastle106118130136143
    North Tyneside8499105121119
    South Tyneside107124135142155
    Sunderland93114118132134

    West Midlands

    Birmingham96114122139136
    Coventry85103111119122
    Dudley6985919799
    Sandwell89117127128130
    Solihull4558675066
    Walsall7597104106107
    Wolverhampton91114121125135

    West Yorkshire

    Bradford8195100102105
    Calderdale7080858783
    Kirklees6373798277
    Leeds8392969797
    Wakefield6170738084

    Table 3. Dependants (excluding partners) of supplementary benefit claimants

    Estimated numbers (thousands)

    Metropolitan districts

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1984

    1985

    Greater Manchester

    Bolton911121413
    Bury45665
    Manchester2732333940
    Oldham79121213
    Rochdale911111112
    Salford1111111314
    Stockport67889
    Tameside69999
    Trafford57768
    Wigan711121315

    Merseyside

    Knowsley1518181718
    Liverpool3136384340
    St. Helens679109
    Sefton1010131414
    Wirral1316181718

    South Yorkshire

    Barnsley677910
    Doncaster911121414
    Rotherham810111213
    Sheffield1418202123

    Tyne and Wear

    Gateshead88101010
    Newcastle1113141616
    North Tyneside68889
    South Tyneside6781011
    Sunderland1518172021

    West Midlands

    Birmingham4960708278
    Coventry1414171618
    Dudley810111314
    Sandwell1015171920
    Solihull67757
    Walsall1113171715
    Wolverhampton1214161818

    West Yorkshire

    Bradford1926302829
    Calderdale57888
    Kirklees1215151615
    Leeds2429292832
    Wakefield89111114

    Table 4. Dependants (excluding partners) of supplementary benefit claimants per thousand head of population

    Estimated

    Metropolitan districts

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1984

    1985

    Greater Manchester

    Bolton3542445450
    Bury2227323332
    Manchester5870718689
    Oldham3040545357
    Rochdale4553525656
    Salford4347465659
    Stockport2125292831
    Tameside2742404142
    Trafford2432342935
    Wigan2436394248

    Merseyside

    Knowsley86106106102108
    Liverpool6171768682
    St. Helens3137455449
    Sefton3334444746
    Wirral3947524954

    Metropolitan districts

    1981

    1982

    1983

    1984

    1985

    South Yorkshire

    Barnsley2529304243
    Doncaster2937414750
    Rotherham3441424953
    Sheffield2633373942

    Tyne and Wear

    Gateshead3639494947
    Newcastle3747515658
    North Tyneside3239423945
    South Tyneside3543516573
    Sunderland4961576869

    West Midlands

    Birmingham4858698277
    Coventry4544535059
    Dudley2534384345
    Sandwell3350546267
    Solihull3037352635
    Walsall4150636557
    Wolverhampton4853617370

    West Yorkshire

    Bradford4256656162
    Calderdale2837414144
    Kirklees3239394339
    Leeds3440414045
    Wakefield2729373644

    Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

    Farmers (Radiation Compensation)

    33.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on compensation to hill farmers in Cumbria for losses arising from the Chernobyl incident.

    35.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what recent representations he has received regarding compensation of farmers for losses incurred as a result of restrictions on the movement, sale and slaughter of sheep; and if he will make a statement.

    Folllowing discussions with industry representatives, we have introduced three schemes of compensation for sheep producers in the areas in which movement and slaughter restrictions have been imposed. The first scheme helps producers of those finished lambs which, through being held back, were subsequently rejected for variable premium on the ground of over-fatness when the areas were released from restrictions. The second scheme compensates producers for their market price losses on marked sheep released from the designated areas which were presented at store markets and sales, as well as liveweight certification centres. The third scheme provides assistance towards the direct costs incurred by producers of finished lambs and cast ewes. The Government consider that these compensation arrangements represent a fair and balanced response to the needs of sheep producers whose marketing, prices and costs have been affected by the restrictions.

    Butter

    2.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how much butter is currently stored in intervention in the United Kingdom; and what percentage change this represents over 1985.

    There were 267,675 tonnes of butter in intervention in the United Kingdom on 29 October, representing a 32 per cent. increase over the same week in 1985.

    Agricultural Surpluses

    3.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether he has submitted any proposals to the European Commission to reduce the cost to the European community of surplus agricultural production.

    I have consistently argued for policies which would restrain the production and budgetary cost of surpluses within the European Community.

    23.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is his latest estimate of the cost of European Economic Community agricultural surpluses for 1986–87; and what was the comparable cost for 1984–85 and 1985–86.

    The 1986 Community budget and the 1987 draft budget provide 14,048 mecu and 14,488 mecu respectively for expenditure on public storage and disposal of those products which are in structural surplus (cereals, sugar, wine, beef and milk products). The comparable figures for 1984 and 1985 were 11,432 mecu and 12,464 mecu respectively.

    Chernobyl Disaster

    12.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he has received any information on the implications for agriculture of the Chernobyl disaster from his opposite number in the Soviet Union and on any lessons to be learnt, and if he will make a statement.

    Cereals

    13.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is his latest estimate of the likely cereal harvest in 1986.

    41.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on the 1986 cereal harvest.

    I refer the hon. Members to the reply I gave earlier to my hon. Friend the Member for Suffolk, South (Mr. Yeo).

    16.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on the implementation of the cereal co-responsibility levy; and if he will make a statement.

    I refer the hon. Member to the reply 1 gave earlier today to my hon. Friend the Member for Dorset, North (Mr. Baker) and the hon. Member for Rhondda (Mr. Rogers).

    21.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what information he has as to the percentage change in the cereal prices received by farmers in Germany, France and United Kingdom, respectively in the current year as compared with 1985.

    Percentage change in market prices between July—September 1985 and July—September 1986.

    United Kingdom

    France

    Germany

    Breadmaking Wheat-7·0+ 5·9-3·0
    Feed Wheat+3·4N/A-2·8
    Feed Barley+3·5+4·5-4·0
    Malting Barley+13·1N/A+8·2
    Oats+21·0N/A-1·0

    Ex-farm price data are not available. The percentage above are based on average market prices derived from prices supplied by member states to the European Commission. The 1986–87 market prices used are inclusive of co-responsibility levy.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what assessment he has made of the implications of the cereals co-responsibility levy for the economic viability of (a) farms and (b) grain merchants.

    As the levy has been in force for only four months I am reluctant to attempt generalisations about its effect. Farmers themselves are not normally liable to pay the levy, which is collected at the stage of processing, export, or sale into intervention. But it was designed to reduce the incentive to cereals production for all but the smallest farmers. The distortions and complications which it threatens in other areas — especially for grain merchants and users—is one reason why I have always favoured achieving this objective through direct action on prices.

    Council Of Agriculture Ministers

    14.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on progress on his priorities as President of the Council of Ministers.

    27.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on progress on his priorities as President of the Council of Agriculture Ministers.

    My priority as president is the expeditious handling of the Commission's proposals for CAP reform, particularly of the beef and dairy regimes, and of measures which contribute to the completion of the internal market.

    25.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement about the decisions taken by the Council of Agriculture Ministers since he assumed the Presidency.

    I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to him by my right hon. Friend the Member for Suffolk, Coastal (Mr. Gummer) on 16 July, at column 555, and to press notices issued by my Department on 17 September and 16 October, recording the outcome of the September and October Agriculture Councils respectively, copies of which have been placed in the Library of the House.

    British Food (Marketing)

    15.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what plans he has to improve the marketing of British food.

    The Government established Food From Britain in 1983 to improve the marketing of British food. We are providing some £14 million to FFB during the five years to 1987–88 and financial commitments have now been made by the food and agricultural industries. Provided their contributions reach at least £3 million in 1988–89, further Government funds will be available until 1990–91. FFB has made an encouraging start, and I believe that it will continue to build on its initial successes.

    Advisory Services

    17.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what revenue he now expects to be yielded by charging for advisory services.

    As stated in my reply to the hon. Member for Wentworth (Mr. Hardy) on 12 June 1986, at column 284, new charges for ADAS advisory and promotional work are expected to raise at least £5 million in 1987–88. I have every confidence that this target can be achieved.

    Cocoa, Chocolate And Confectionery Alliance

    18.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he last met the president of the Cocoa, Chocolate and Confectionery Alliance; and if he will make a statement.

    My right hon. Friend the Minister last met the president of the Cocoa, Chocolate and Confectionery Alliance on 25 October 1985. I was present at this year's joint annual luncheon on 24 October and will be meeting the president on 13 November.

    Radiation Levels

    19.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether any arrangements have been introduced for the monitoring of radiation in soft fruits since the Chernobyl incident.

    Soft fruits have been included in this Department's intensive testing programme carried out since the Chernobyl incident. The results have been published regularly and are available in the Library of the House. These show levels of radioactivity to be very low and of no cause for concern.

    28.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what radiation detection equipment is held by his Department for the measurement of levels of radiation in a Chernobyl-type disaster.

    The Ministry's laboratories at Lowestoft and Weybridge are equipped to the highest international standards for radiological analysis. Most measurements made following the Chernobyl accident have employed high resolution solid state gamma spectrometry. Radiochemical separation followed by low-level alpha or beta counting is undertaken for radionuclides which are not gamma emitters.The Ministry is undertaking monitoring of live animals and agricultural materials in field conditions using portable single channel scintillation rate meters supplied to Ministry specifications.

    31.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he proposes to simplify the terms used for the measurement of radiation levels in food and livestock; and if he will make a statement.

    No. My Department uses the international system of units (SI units) in common with other United Kingdom and international organisations. This system of units is unambiguously understood throughout the world and introduction of new units would create confusion. The amount of radioactivity present is measured in bequerels (Bq). One bequerel is equivalent to one radioactive disintegration per second. Concentrations of radioactivity in food and livestock are expressed in units of bequerels per kilogram (abbreviated to Bq/kg) in solids or bequerels per litre (abbreviated Bq/1) in liquids.

    Food Additives

    20.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what recent discussions he has had with food manufacturers about the inclusion of additives in food.

    I and my officials regularly receive representations from a wide range of persons and organisations interested in the use of food additives. My right hon. Friend the Minister spoke at the annual luncheon of the Food and Drink Federation on 18 September. I have had no discussions with food manufacturers on this subject.

    Land (Set Aside Schemes)

    22.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether he will make a statement on progress regarding set aside schemes for land, designed to curtail agricultural surpluses.

    I put forward a paper on the diversion of land from cereals for discussion at the recent informal meeting of Community Agriculture Ministers. I was encouraged by the constructive and thoughtful reception that it received. I hope that discussion of the issues which it raises will now be continued within the Community.

    Confectionery

    24.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is the estimated value of United Kingdom produced confectionery for each year since 1979; and if he will make a statement.

    My Department does not collect this information. However, the Cocoa, Chocolate and Confectionery Alliance publishes estimates of the value of United Kingdom manufacturers' home sales and exports. The sum of these will overstate the value of production, which is not published, to the extent that United Kingdom manufacturers merchant imported confectionery.

    Home SalesExports
    £1 million£ million
    19791,082177
    19801,182176
    19811,249
    19821,346175
    19831,412201
    19841,543224
    19851,702234

    Fisheries Policy

    26.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether he will make a statement on the outcome of EEC Council of Fisheries Ministers meetings held during the summer recess.

    I have nothing to add to the reply given to the hon. Member for Greenock and Port Glasgow (Dr. Godman) earlier today.

    38.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what progress has been made in reconsidering the effect of the proposed 90mm mesh size on inshore fisheries.

    I have nothing to add to the reply given to the hon. Member for Greenock and Port Glasgow (Dr. Godman) earlier today.

    Agricultural Land

    29.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is his latest estimate of the annual loss of all grades of agricultural land to any non-agricultural or non-forestry development.

    For England, the average annual loss of agricultural land to non-agricultural or non-forestry development for the five-year period ending June 1985 is estimated to be 14,600 hectares (36,000 acres).

    Farm Wardens

    30.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what role farm wardens would play in the case of an incident in the United Kingdom similar to that which occurred at Chernobyl; and what training they are given.

    Farm wardens are part of my Department's wartime organisation and there are no plans at present to appoint them for other purposes.

    32.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if, in the light of the lessons of the Chernobyl disaster, he proposes to increase the number of farm wardens and to enhance their training; and if he will make a statement.

    Farm wardens are part of my Department's wartime organisation. There are no plans at present to appoint them for other purposes or to increases the numbers already estimated to be required in time of war.

    Beef Variable Premium Scheme

    34.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on the future of the beef variable premium scheme.

    As part of this year's price fixing decisions, the Council of Ministers agreed that the European Commission's proposals for reforming the beef regime should be studied further with a view to decisions being taken by 31 December 1986. The regulations governing the beef variable premium scheme were accordingly extended to that date. The Commission's proposal for changes to the beef regime include a Community-wide premium scheme which is intended to replace the variable premium. The Commission has, however, undertaken to propose a continuation of the variable premium scheme, taking account of the budgetary situation, if changes to the regime are not agreed in time be brought into effect by the end of the year. Discussions on the proposals are continuing and we are pressing the merits of a slaughter premium scheme in that context.

    Milk Quotas

    36.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on the operation of milk quotas.

    Dairy farmers in the United Kingdom have generally adapted well to the milk quota system. The rising trend in milk production in the European Community has been checked, but there is still a substantial excess of supply over demand. Reductions in the level of quota were agreed earlier this year, and the Council of Ministers is now considering ways to tighten up the operation of the quota system to make it more effective.

    Straw Burning

    37.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he is satisfied with current measures to reduce the adverse impact of straw burning; and if he will make a statement.

    Yes. Although there have been isolated exceptions, the indications are that there has been less careless or inconsiderate burning of straw during this year's harvest season. I believe that a combination of strengthened byelaws, the publicity campaign mounted by my Department, and the code of practice issued by the National Farmers Union have contributed greatly to this improvement in the situation. Moreover, as the results of our continuing research and development work on alternative methods of disposal have been made known to the industry, an increasing number of farmers have been able to avoid straw and stubble burning altogether. These are encouraging trends, but we shall keep the matter under review.

    Intervention Costs

    39.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the total amount spent on intervention in 1985–86; and what proportion of this was recovered from European funds.

    United Kingdom expenditure on all aspects of intervention was £823 million net of recovery of VAT and of sales receipts, some of which will have related to produce purchased in earlier years, of £163 million. The Community does not meet the cost of purchases, but does contribute towards the financing cost of the stocks held, losses on sale, devaluation of stocks and storage and related costs. These contributions amounted to £310 million of which £75 million was for financing.

    Common Agricultural Policy

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what plans he has to propose changes in the common agricultural policy following the recent agreement reached by the member countries of the general agreement on tariffs and trade at Punta del Este; and if he will make a statement.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will give the latest estimate of the amount of the EEC budget for 1986 to be spent on the common agricultural policy.

    The EC budget for 1986 provides 23,104 mecu for expenditure under the common agricultural policy. This is about 66 per cent. of the total budget.

    Forestry Commission

    40.

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how much land the Forestry Commission owns in England; and how much has been sold since May 1979.

    The Forestry Commission does not own any land. Ownership is vested in England, in the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, and the land is formally placed at the disposal of the forestry commissioners to manage in accordance with their statutory duties.As at 31 March 1986, the Forestry Commission managed 285,685 hectares of land in England. Some 20,300 hectares were sold between 1 May 1979 and 21 September 1986.

    Animals (Export)

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) what steps his Department is taking in conjunction with British and French customs authorities, to ensure that animals are not illegally being transported to Spain, or any other country where the slaughterhouses do not come up to British standards;(2) to which countries, apart from Spain, the ban on the export of live animals applies for welfare reasons.

    It is my Department's policy to license exports of farm livestock for immediate slaughter or for further fattening only to member states of the European Community where they will have the protection of Community safeguards on welfare in transit and at the place of slaughter. Since Spain and Portugal have not yet implemented the relevant directives, we have not licensed any exports to them.In view of the recent reports that live sheep exported to France have in fact been sent on from that country to an abbatoir in Spain, we have told exporters of sheep to France that before any further licence is granted they will have to provide documentary proof from the French importer that the consignment is going to a destination in France and will not be sent on to any other country.

    Export Licences

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what penalties have been imposed for false declaration of country of destination when applying for an export licence; and how many prosecutions there have been for such false declarations.

    My Department is not aware that any prosecutions have been taken under the Export of Animals (Protection) Order 1981 for false declarations of country of destination. Recent allegations are currently being investigated.

    Nuclear Radiation

    asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he proposes to publish a report on the lessons learnt from the Chernobyl disaster so far as his responsibilities for agriculture are concerned; and if he will make a statement.

    My Department is playing its full part in the Government's review of contingency arrangements following the Chernobyl accident and will make any necessary changes to its emergency plans. Any revision of the Department's emergency arrangements would be notified to those required to implement them, as well as other Departments and emergency services.

    Defence

    Nimrod Programme

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the calibre of the scientific and technical staff of his Department overseeing the development of the Nimrod system; and if he will make a statement.

    I have every confidence in the scientific and technical staff employed by the Ministry of Defence.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence to what he attributes the cost overspends and the overruns on the Nimrod programme.

    These can be largely attributed to what was with hindsight a significant underestimation at the outset of the project in 1977 of the technical difficulty and hence the timescale and cost of completing the work. The absence of contractual incentives was also a contributory factor.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence to what extent the Nimrod programme required technological innovations; and what account was taken of this when assessing the extent and level of scientific and technical supervision from his Department.

    When it was authorised in 1977, the Nimrod AEW project was considered to he technologically ambitious, but nonetheless achievable within the state of the art at that time. In recognition of the degree of technological innovation required, considerable scientific and technical resources were made available both from the Department's research and development establishments and from headquarters staff.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence to what extent poor performance by contractors and failure to follow Ministry of Defence supervision has contributed to delays in the Nimrod programme; and what action was taken by his Department in response to each such incident.

    The performance by GEC Avionics Ltd. on the Nimrod programme has to be viewed against the background of an initial underestimate of the technical difficulties involved. However, it is because we were dissatisfied with the action being taken to resolve these difficulties that we initiated the current competition and negotiated the interim risk-sharing contractual arrangements under which development work is currently proceeding.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has for the application of the outcome of research programmes for Nimrod in areas other than to defence; and if he will make a statement.

    The research work undertaken in support of the Nimrod AEW project has led to significant advances in a number of technical areas, including antennae, high power transmitters and radar signal processing. These are expected to be of value in both civil and military applications. The general aim of encouraging exploitation of defence research for civil benefit has been further enhanced recently by the creation of Defence Technology Enterprises Ltd. which was set up as a joint initiative between MOD and industry.

    Aircraft Crashes

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he will make a statement about the Tornado aircraft crash which occurred on the Otterburn range on 21 October, and resulted in two deaths; and whether, in the light of the nine fatalities which have occurred in military aircraft crashes in north-east England in the last nine years, he will institute a full review of the safety regulations applied to such low flying.

    The Tornado aircraft involved was from the German Air Force which, according to established practice, has convened an inquiry, which will be assisted by the RAF, to establish the cause of the accident. It would not be appropriate for me to comment further on the circumstances of the accident until the inquiry is completed, other than to express my regret at the tragic loss of life. Safety regulations for military flying, both over designated range areas and more generally, are a matter to which I attach great importance and are kept under close and continual review.

    Russian Speakers

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the present number of fluent Russian language speakers in each of the armed services compared to the number approximately three years ago.

    There are a total of 148 fluent Russian speakers currently in the regular armed forces. This compares with a total of 143 in 1983. A breakdown by Service and year is:

    Royal NavyRoyal MarinesArmyRoyal Air ForceTotal
    198624210616148
    19832629916143

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the number of seagoing Her Majesty's ships whose complement includes a qualified Russian linguist.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the number of full-time instructors of the Russian language in each of the armed services for each of the last three years.

    Details of the number of full-time instructors of the Russian language in each of the armed services for each of the last three years are as follows. Considerable use is also made of Ministry of Defence employed civilian instructional staff for language tuition for the Armed Services. Details of the number of such civilian staff engaged in full-time Russian language tuition are as follows:

    Service198619851984
    Royal Navy000
    Army11118
    Royal Air Force110
    MOD Civilian242018

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the number of qulaified Russian language speakers at present actively serving in the Royal Naval Reserve, and the numbers who have completed training commitments for each of the last three years.

    There are at present 10 Russian language speakers qualified to interpreter standard serving in the Royal Naval Reserve, all of whom have completed their training commitments for each of the past three years.

    Raf Upwood

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he has any plans to convert all or part of RAF Upwood base in Cambridgeshire into a United States wartime contingency hospital.

    RAF Upwood is used by the United States air force for a variety of support functions, including use as a peacetime storage facility and as a hospital which would be activated in an emergency.

    Raf Cosford

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if there are any plans to convert all or part of RAF Cosford base in Shropshire into a United States wartime contingency hospital.

    Nuclear Missiles

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list by variant the number of (a) short range nuclear weapons with a range of up to 200 km and (b) medium range nuclear missiles with a range of between 200 km and 1,000 km that have been removed from Europe as a result of the 27 October 1983 Montebello decision of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation nuclear planning group.

    Departmental Contracts

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will name and describe the procedures of financial appraisal and checking of commercial reliability applied to a company wishing to supply goods or services under contract to his Department, specifying when each procedure is applied; and if he will make a statement.

    Companies wishing to supply goods or services to the Ministry of Defence and to be registered on the defence contractors list are required to complete application forms (standardised across all Government departments) providing details of their financial standing, technical capabilities and quality systems. Bank and trade references are taken up and the audited accounts provided are appraised by the Ministry's professional accountants.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish a list showing, for each of the last three years (a) the number of his Department's contracts made for the supply of goods or services, (b) the total number of companies receiving such contracts and (c) the number of companies receiving contracts totalling £5 million or more in value.

    The information is as follows:

  • (a) The number or MOD headquarters contracts and financial amendments placed for the supply of goods and services for financial years 1983–84 and 1984–85 are as shown in table 2.10 of the statement on the Defence Estimates 1986. For financial year 1985–86 the number is 116,552.
  • (b) The total numbers of companies receiving individual contracts worth more than £5,000 in value were approximately 4,120 in 1983–84, 4,215 in 1984–85 and 4,410 in 1985–86. Information is not readily available for lower value contracts.
  • (c) The numbers of companies receiving contracts totalling £5 million or more in value were some, 115 in 1983–84; 75 in 1984–85 and 140 in 1985–86.
  • The figures given in

    (a) exclude local purchase orders, which totalled 495,413 in 1983–84, 505,880 in 1984–85 and 435,395 in 1985–86. The number of companies receiving such orders is not available.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will describe what statistical information is available about the work load and results of the procedures of financial appraisal and checking of commercial viability applied to companies in relation to the supply of goods or services to his Department; and if he will make a statement.

    In 1985–86 the Ministry's professional accountants undertook some 700 financial appraisals of accounts (including where necessary those of parent and holding companies) of companies wishing to become suppliers of goods or services to the Ministry of Defence. As a result of these appraisals the Ministry declined applications from some 40 companies. In the

    YearOrderedLocationTotal in operation
    19791xCray1AAWRE Aldermaston1xCray1A
    19801xCray1A
    19811xCray1A
    19821xCray1A
    19831xCray1SFAE Farnborough1xCray1A, 1xCray1S
    19831xCray1SRARDE Fort Halstead2xCray1S, 1xCray1A
    19841xCrayXMPAWRE Aldermaston2xCray1S, 1xCray1A, 1xCrayXMP
    19852xCray1S, 1xCray1A, 1xCrayXMP
    198612xCray1S, 1xCray1A, 1xCrayXMP
    1 To date.

    same year the Ministry's accountants appraised some 240 accounts of contractors who are regularly employed by the Ministry on larger value non-competitive contracts.

    asked the Secretary of' State for Defence if he will describe what information is available about contracts for the supply of goods or services that have been broken in recent years, including contracts that have been broken by a company becoming insolvent; and if he will make a statement.

    The information could not be provided without disproportionate time and effort.

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence (1) if he will name and describe the procedures of financial appraisal and checking of commercial viability applied to a company engaged to supply goods or services to his Department when the ownership or control of the company changes; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he will identify the procedures of financial appraisal and checking of commercial viability applied to a company wishing to supply goods or services under contract to his Department which include some examination of ownership or control of the company; and if he will make a statement.

    When the Ministry is made aware of a change in the ownership of a defence contractor, copies of audited accounts provided by the new owner are appraised by the Ministry's professional accountants in the same manner as for a new applicant for registration.When a change of ownership takes place during the currency of a contract, any legal action necessary is taken to transfer formally the relevant contract after, the financial and technical competence of the new company has been established. Changes in the control of a company, but not its ownership, do not require re-registration procedures since any existing contractual obligations would be unaffected.Companies seeking registration arc required to provide details of all associated companies, directors and major shareholders. Amendments to this information are sought if there is a change in the ownership of a company already registered on the defence contractor's list.

    Cray Computers

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish a list showing for each year since 1979, the numbers and types of Cray computers (a) on order for his Department and (b) operational within his Department specifying the location of each such computer operational in the period; and if he will make a statement.

    Northern Ireland

    asked the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to his written answer of 11 July, Official Report, columns 303–4, whether he has anything to add concerning the figures for the strength of the armed forces of the Crown in Northern Ireland in each of the months in the period September 1985 to May 1986.

    [pursuant to his reply, 11 July 1986, c. 303–4]: I regret that the figures quoted in my answer have been found to contain errors. The correct figures are as follows:

    The numbers of armed forces personnel in Northern Ireland (as at end of each month) are as follows:

    RN/RM

    Army

    RAF

    UDR

    Total

    1985

    September1918,8731,0006,45116,515
    October1899,0449886,50316,724
    November1859,0149896,47816,666
    December1848,9129946,50816,598

    1986

    January1849,4701,0546,54217,250
    February1889,9189986,54717,651
    March1889,9069846,56217,640
    April18810,1229716,55917,840
    May18810,1611,0256,54117,915