Written Answers To Questions
Tuesday 4 November 1986
Overseas Development
Tropical Development Research Institute
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will give details of any changes made in plans for the concentration of units of the Tropical Development Research Institute at Chatham since he made the initial announcement.
There have been no changes to the plan announced by my right hon. Friend the Member for Aylesbury (Mr. Raison), the then Minister for Overseas Development, on 5 September 1985 for the relocation of the Tropical Development and Research Institute and the Land Resources Development Centre to a single site at the Chatham maritime development area. Detailed planning is continuing and the move is expected to be completed during 1988.
Education And Science
Teacher Numbers
44.
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what steps he intends to take to increase the numbers of teachers of physics, chemistry, mathematics and other sciences.
The consultative document "Action on Teacher Supply in Mathematics, Physics and Technology" set out our proposals for those secondary subjects experiencing the most serious supply difficulties. Some of the measures discussed in the document are relevant to other science provision. We shall continue to monitor the demand for teachers of all subjects and to consider where further action might be necessary.
Literacy
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science (1) if he will rank in ascending order by his country the number of weekly hours of reading time for each of the age groups (i) 15 to 24, (ii) 25 to 34, (iii) 35 to 44, (iv) 45 to 54, (v) 55 to 64 and (vi) 65 years and over in those Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries for which he has information;(2) if he will rank in ascending order by country the total number of weekly hours of reading time in those Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries for which he has information;(3) what information his Department holds on the incidence of functional illiteracy by age group for the British population.
This information is not available centrally.
School Closures
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list the number of schools closed for each year from 1979–80 to 1985–86 inclusive, and the percentage of these closures which involved rural schools.
Information on school closures is kept by calendar year. Numbers of closures approved by the Secretary of State or determined by local education authorities since 1979 are shown in the table.
| Year | Total school closures | Rural school closures | Rural school closures as a percentage of all closures |
| 1979 | 77 | 26 | 33·8 |
| 1980 | 110 | 45 | 40·9 |
| 1981 | 225 | 89 | 39·6 |
| 1982 | 247 | 76 | 30·8 |
| 1983 | 295 | 131 | 44·4 |
| 1984 | 259 | 103 | 39·8 |
| 1985 | 210 | 56 | 26·7 |
| 11986 | 98 | 36 | 36·7 |
| 1 To end of September. | |||
Academic Year
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science if there are any plans to alter the current three-term academic year; and if he will make a statement.
The National Association of Head Teachers, the Association of County Councils and, very recently, the National Union of Teachers have all issued consultative documents on this subject. I understand that the NAHT will be discussing the matter shortly with representatives of examining and validating bodies. We shall be interested to see the outcome of the consultations.
Teachers (Pay)
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what recent representations he has received regarding the position in the talks on the pay of teachers in England and Wales.
My right hon. Friend has received some 200 letters since the Coventry meeting in July. Nearly all have been critical of the Coventry heads of agreement The most common criticism has been the reduced differentials for the present scale 4 and senior teachers. Other criticisms have included the long period of assimilation to the proposed new pay scale, and the reduced opportunities for promotion.
Single Sex Schools
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science how many single sex schools there are in England; if he will break down the numbers into local education authority areas, showing the number of schools (a) for boys and (b) for girls; and if he will make a statement.
The number of maintained single sex schools in England in January 1986 was 616. The breakdown by local education authority is as follows:
Boys Schools
| Girls Schools
| |
| Barking | 1 | 1 |
| Barnet | 3 | 5 |
| Bexley | 3 | 3 |
| Brent | 2 | 2 |
| Bromley | 8 | 8 |
| Croydon | 7 | 7 |
| Ealing | 1 | 1 |
| Enfield | 4 | 3 |
| Haringey | 1 | 1 |
| Harrow | 2 | 2 |
| Havering | 2 | 2 |
| Hillingdon | 1 | 1 |
| Hounslow | 2 | 3 |
| Kingston Upon Thames | 4 | 4 |
| Merton | 4 | 4 |
| Newham | 3 | 3 |
| Redbridge | 1 | 1 |
| Richmond Upon Thames | 1 | |
| Sutton | 7 | 5 |
| Waltham Forest | 5 | 5 |
| Birmingham | 12 | 13 |
| Coventry | 3 | 3 |
| Dudley | 1 | |
| Sandwell | 1 | 1 |
| Walsall | 1 | 1 |
| Wolverhampton | 1 | |
| Knowsley | 1 | 1 |
| Liverpool | 11 | 11 |
| St. Helens | 2 | 2 |
| Sefton | 2 | 2 |
| Wirral | 9 | 8 |
| Manchester | 3 | 3 |
| Stockport | 1 | 1 |
| Tameside | 3 | 2 |
| Trafford | 8 | 8 |
| Bradford | 2 | 2 |
| Kirklees | 1 | 1 |
| Leeds | 4 | 5 |
| Newcastle Upon Tyne | 1 | 1 |
| Sunderland | 1 | 1 |
| Inner London | 38 | 41 |
| Avon | 3 | 4 |
| Bedfordshire | 1 | 1 |
| Berkshire | 6 | 8 |
| Buckinghamshire | 7 | 7 |
| Cambridgeshire | 1 | 1 |
| Cheshire | 1 | |
| Cornwall | 1 | |
| Derbyshire | 2 | 2 |
| Devon | 5 | 5 |
| Dorset | 7 | 7 |
| East Sussex | 2 | 2 |
| Essex | 10 | 9 |
| Gloucestershire | 6 | 6 |
| Hampshire | 5 | 6 |
| Hertfordshire | 7 | 11 |
| Humberside | 6 | 5 |
| Kent | 33 | 36 |
| Lancashire | 6 | 5 |
| Leicestershire | 1 | 1 |
| Lincolnshire | 6 | 7 |
| Norfolk | 1 | 1 |
| North Yorkshire | 2 | 1 |
| Northamptonshire | 3 | 3 |
| Nottinghamshire | 1 | 2 |
| Oxfordshire | 2 | 2 |
| Shropshire | 2 | 1 |
| Somerset | 1 | |
| Surrey | 3 | 2 |
| Warwickshire | 2 | 2 |
| West Sussex | 3 | 3 |
| Wiltshire | 2 | 2 |
| England | 303 | 313 |
A And O-Level Passes
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science pursuant to the answer of 22 October to the hon. Member for Leicester, East Official Report, column 885, if he will now give comprehensive figures detailing the number of passes attained in A and 0-levels for Leicester and the east midlands.
This information is not collected centrally.
City Technology Colleges
asked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what representations he has received from the policy sub-committee of Manchester Education Committee concerning his proposal to establish city technology colleges; what reply he is sending; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend has recently received a letter from Councillor Harris, Chair of the Policy Sub-Committee of the Manchester City Council Education Committee. He will be replying shortly, and a copy of his reply will be placed in the Library.
Transport
Orange Badge Scheme
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what information he has about the number of orange badges issued to people who are registered blind in (i) inner London, (ii) outer London, (iii) metropolitan districts, (iv) non-metropolitan counties in England, (v) Wales and (vi) Scotland.
Information is not collected centrally in the form requested. In the light of details supplied by some local authorities it is estimated there are currently some 24,000 such badge holders throughout Britain.
Road Assessment Studies, London
asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he now expects to publish the consultants' reports on the four London road assessment studies.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply that I gave to the hon. Member for Greenwich on 27 October at column 40.
Channel Tunnel
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what plans his Department has to improve communications, other than by rail, from the north east to the Channel tunnel.
Our aim is to ensure that the network of motorways and trunk roads is adequate to meet current and future needs. These include the need to provide access to the Channel tunnel from all parts of the country. The current construction programme includes schemes to upgrade existing north-south routes and roads to the tunnel in Kent.
Marine Pilotage
asked the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what safeguards he intends to introduce to ensure that commercial pressures on ports to reduce costs will not reduce standards within the marine pilotage service;(2) if he has any plans to change the current arrangements for marine pilotage so as to improve safety of navigation.
The Government intend to introduce proposals for legislation as soon as possible which will transfer responsibility for pilotage to the harbour authorities. The legislation will require authorities to provide the pilotage services which are necessary to secure safety of navigation, and there is no reason to believe that the authorities will act irresponsibly in meeting this requirement.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will now list those harbour authorities to which he intends to transfer pilotage responsibilities.
The terms of the new legislation will determine which harbour authorities will become responsible for pilotage. A list of the relevant authorities will be made available when the legislative proposals are published.
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list information available to him as to which harbour authorities have experience in running pilotage services.
Of the 45 pilotage authorities which have responsibility for pilotage, 29 are harbour authorities; those harbour authorities which are active in this capacity are as listed:
- Aberdeen Harbour Board
- Associated British Ports
- Berwick Harbour Commissioners
- Bristol Port Authority
- Coleraine Harbour Commissioners
- Dundee Port Authority
- Fenland District Council
- Fraserburgh Harbour Commissioners
- Grampian Regional Council
- Inverness Harbour Trust
- Irvine Harbour Company
- King's Lynn Conservancy Board
- Lancaster Port Commissioners
- Lerwick Harbour Trust
- Littlehampton Harbour Board
- Londonderry Port and Harbour Commissioners
- Manchester Ship Canal Company
- Mersey Docks and Harbour Company
- Montrose Harbour Trust
- Orkney Islands Council
- Peterhead Harbour Trust
- Shetland Islands Council
- Wick Harbour Trust
asked the Secretary of State for Transport what estimate he has made of cost savings arising from economies in administration and operation as a result of the proposed integration of pilotage with other port services.
I refer to my right hon. Friend's reply to my hon. Friend's earlier question on 25 July at column 515.
Legislative Proposals (Savings)
asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make it his policy to quantify estimated savings expected to be achieved from legislative proposals emanating from his Department.
It is already my right hon. Friend's policy to do so wherever possible.
Employment
Community Industry Scheme
asked the Paymaster General if he will consider the extension of the community industry scheme to allow participants to stay on the scheme for two years instead of one.
No.
Holidays
asked the Paymaster General if he will rank in ascending order for the most recent year for which figures are available the number of public holidays and days of annual leave entitlement per year per employee in each Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development country for which he has information.
Different countries apply different conventions to the definition and measurement of holidays so their statistics are not wholly comparable. However, the table gives the latest information which is available ranked in ascending order of annual leave entitlement.
| Number of public holidays and days of annual leave | ||
| Annual entitlement per employee in 1980 (unless otherwise stated) | ||
| Public holidays | Annual leave entitlement | |
| Japan | 12 | 6–203 |
| Germany | 11–132 | 18–333 |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 204 |
| Norway5 | 9 | 203 |
| Canada6 | 10·6 | 20·33 |
| Italy | 9–10 | 20–2617 |
| Portugal | 12–14 | 21–301 |
| Netherlands | 8 | 233 |
| Denmark | 9·5 | 241 |
| France | 10 | 241 |
| Belgium | 10 | 241 |
| Sweden | 10 | 251 |
| Luxembourg | 10 | 2531 |
| Austria6 | 12 | 263 |
| Notes: | ||
| 1 Statutory minimum. | ||
| 2 Varies according to state. | ||
| 3 Average entitlement. | ||
| 4 Leave to which over 85 per cent. of full-time employees in Great Britain were entitled in 1981. | ||
| 5 Figures for 1978. | ||
| 6 Figures for 1977. | ||
| 7 Varies according to industry. | ||
Source for other countries: Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development ( Living Conditions in OECD Countries, 1986).
Hours Of Work
asked the Paymaster General what information his Department collects on the trends in average hours actually worked per week per employed person and activity sector for England and Wales.
An index of average weekly hours worked by operatives in manufacturing industries in Great Britain (but not in England and Wales separately) is published each month in table 1.12 of the labour market data section of Employment Gazette. This index is based on the average basic hours worked by operatives covered by national wage agreements, together with the hours of overtime worked and hours lost through short-time working.Table 5.6 of the labour market data section of Employment Gazette gives information from the new earnings survey, which is conducted each April, on average weekly hours of full-time employees in Great Britain in manufacturing industries and all industries and services. Table 5.4 gives similar information for certain industries for full-time manual employees by industry in the United Kingdom for October.Estimates of the average hours worked by persons in employment in all industries in England and Wales in the spring of each year can also be derived from the labour force survey.
Special Employment Measures
asked the Paymaster General what estimates there are for expenditure on each special employment measure, including YTS, for each year from 1980 for each area manpower board in England, Wales and Scotland.
I regret that it is not possible to provide the information requested except at a disproportionate cost.
Self-Employment
asked the Paymaster General if he will make a statement on Her Majesty's Government's policy towards self-employment, with specific reference to current Inland Revenue practice in relation to assessment for income tax and national insurance contributions.
The Government is committed to encouraging self-employment as an important source of enterprise and innovation, new business formation and jobs. I welcome the marked increase in the number of self-employed people, from just over 1·8 million in 1979 to more than 2·7 million now. More than 179,000 self-employed people have benefited from our enterprise allowance scheme.Paragraph 6.12 of the White paper "Building Businesses … Not Barriers" (Cmnd. 9794) recorded progress being made by Inland Revenue and DHSS to improve tax and national insurance procedures for the self-employed. The Government remain committed to seeking further such improvements where these are possible.
Long-Term Unemployed Persons
asked the Paymaster General what plans there are to assist more easily and generously long-term unemployed men and women to relocate to take up employment.
Long-term unemployed people, like other jobseekers, may apply for assistance under the travel to interview scheme, which pays fares to jobseekers attending interviews with employers beyond daily travelling distance of their homes. Restart interviewers give long-term unemployed people advice about this scheme in appropriate cases. There are no plans at present to extend this scheme.
asked the Paymaster General how many men and women over 50 years of age who had been long-term unemployed are now in full-time employment in the northeast region.
The information requested is not available.
Disabled People
asked the Paymaster General if he will list the total number of exemption permits issued by the Manpower Services Commission in relation to the requirement of employers to employ a minimum of 3 per cent. registered disabled people in each of the last seven years for which figures are available.
Information is not collected centrally on the number of permits issued under the terms of the quota scheme. However, figures are available on the numbers of employers who were below quota on 1 June and to whom permits had been issued during the previous 12 months. Figures for the last seven years are set out in the table. The issue of a permit enables an employer who is not employing the 3 per cent. quota of registered disabled people lawfully to engage a specified number of workers who are not so registered. However, the permit does not exempt the employer from the duty under the provisions of the Disabled Persons (Employment) Act to employ the quota.
| Number of employers issued with permits in the 12 months to 1 June | |
| Year | Number |
| 1980 | 22,001 |
| 1981 | 21,183 |
| 1982 | 19,796 |
| 1983 | 18,536 |
| 1984 | 18,769 |
| 1985 | 18,681 |
| 1986 | 18,840 |
asked the Paymaster General if he will list those companies with 1,000 or more employees for which an exemption certificate in respect of employment of disabled people was issued during the last 12 months for which this information is available.
Information about the application of the quota scheme provisions of the Disabled Persons (Employment) Act to individual employers has been treated by successive Governments as confidential and is not disclosed without their agreement.
Minimum Wage Policy
asked the Paymaster General what assessment he has made of the employment consequences of a minimum wage policy.
Using the earnings information from the 1985 new earnings survey, we estimate that a national minimum wage of £80 per week (the level implied in the TUC/Labour party document "Low Pay: Policies and Priorities") could result in job losses ranging between 60,000 and 600,000 over a period of time. This large range reflects uncertainty about the effect of a minimum wage on the structure of earnings, and the extent to which higher paid workers would be able to secure compensating wage increases to restore previous differentials.
Labour Statistics
asked the Paymaster General if he will indicate the nature of each change in the basis of the calculation of the total number of unemployed persons since 1979 and the effect, in terms of numbers, on the unemployed register consequent upon each change.
A full description of all the changes since 1979 which have so far affected the published unemployment figures was given on page 422 of the October 1986 edition of Employment Gazette, a copy of which is the Library.
Availability For Work Regulations
asked the Paymaster General in which department, within the local office, the claim advisers administering the new availability for work regulations will be; and who will be their line managers.
Claimant advisers will operate from unemployment benefit offices and will replace unemployment review officers in the DHSS advising on benefits and re-employment opportunities. They will be managed separately by team managers who will report directly to their respective regional offices.
Trade And Industry
Manufacturing Industry
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will indicate the nature and size of the current deficit in the balance of trade in manufactured goods.
In September, trade in manufactures showed a deficit of £0·6 billion.
Post Office
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what are the financial targets set for the Post Office for 1985–86 and 1986–87, respectively.
As I announced on 24 July 1985, at columns 565–66, each of royal mails and counters was required to secure a 4·5 per cent. return on turnover, on the current cost accounting convention, before tax, but after interest for the financial year 1985–86.As to 1986–87, I announced on 31 July this year that the postal business of the Post Office had been set an overall target of securing a return on turnover of 3·25 per cent. before interest and tax in each of the years 1986–87 to 1988–89. The full text of my announcement was as follows:
"Last year the Post Office moved towards the separation of the Royal Mail and Counters businesses, and earlier this year it announced its decision to divide Royal Mail into two separate businesses, Letters and Parcels. The process of establishing these three businesses and of separating their accounts will not be complete for about another two years. This limits the robustness of the available figures.
But after consulting the Post Office I have decided that the time is right for separate medium-term targets to be set for the three businesses for the three years 1986–87 to 1988–89. National Girobank is already targeted separately.
Last year the Government set the Royal Mail business the performance aim of reducing its real unit costs by 2·2 per cent. in 1985–86 compared with 1984–85, and the Counters business was targeted for a reduction of 1·5 per cent. compared with 1984–85. In the event, Counters achieved its target and Royal Mail bettered its target by 0·2 per cent. I congratulate the management and work force of the Post Office on their achievement.
Nevertheless, I am confident that those employed n the Post Office understand that in order to protect the future of the businesses, it is essential to retain existing customers and attract new work. Further improvements in efficiency remain the key to maintaining and improving the Post Office's competitiveness.
Accordingly I have set the Post Office the target of achieving a reduction of 5·5 per cent. in the real unit costs of the postal business at the end of 1988–89, compared with 1985–86, with at least a 1·5 per cent. reduction to be achieved by the end of 1986–87. I have agreed with the Post Office that the component businesses should be set individual targets to reduce real unit costs over the same period. These will be 6 per cent. for Letters; 5·4 per cent. for Parcels; and 3·7 per cent. for Counters.
The lengthy process of separating the accounts of the new businesses raises problems in attempting to set financial objectives. The review that was announced in July last year of the financial objective for Royal Mail and Counters concluded that the appropriate overall objective was a return on turnover of 3·25 per cent. before net interest and tax, on the current cost accounting basis, in each of the years 1986–87 to 1988–89.
Although the Post Office has proposed profit targets for each of the three businesses in each of those years there must be uncertainty about the reliability of the underlying assumptions until further progress has been made with the new information systems.
To support the overall target of 3·25 per cent. in 1986–87 I have agreed with the Post Office that the three businesses should secure returns in that year on the same basis as the overall target. These will be 3 per cent. for Letters; 6 per cent. for Parcels; and 13 per cent. for Counters.
It is my intention before the end of March next year to agree with the Post Office and announce target returns for the three businesses for 1987–88."
Post Office (Investment)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will state the amount of Post Office investment approved for each year, individually since 1983, together with his estimate of the amount to be approved for 1986–87 and 1987–88; what the amount will be in 1988; and if he will make a statement.
The annual public expenditure White Paper states the level of investment in fixed assets agreed for the succeeding financial year for individual nationalised industries. For the Post Office's postal business the figures for the years 1982–83 were as follows:
| £ million | |
| 1982–83 | 115·0 |
| 1983–84 | 130·0 |
| 1984–85 | 156·8 |
| 1985–86 | 134·0 |
| 1986–87 | 98·0 |
Productivity
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what information he has as to the comparative productivity of foreign-owned firms operating in the United Kingdom and British firms over the past five years; and if he will make a statement.
The table compares the value added per employee in United Kingdom manufacturing industry by United Kingdom and foreign owned enterprises for 1981 and 1983. Data are available only for every second year, the most recent being 1983. The apparent significant difference between the productivity of United Kingdom and foreign firms may, at least in part, be explained by the disproportionate presence of foreign owned firms in high value added sectors of the economy.
| Gross value added per employee by United Kingdom and foreign owned enterprises in the United Kingdom manufacturing industry | ||
| 1981 | 1983 | |
| £ | £ | |
| United Kingdom owned enterprises | 9,631 | 12,323 |
| Foreign owned enterprises | 12,355 | 16,626 |
Source: Annual Censuses of Production.
Cigarette Sales
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what was the volume of cigarette sales in the United Kingdom in 1980–81, 1985–86 and in the first three months of the present financial year; and what proportion of the total volume of those sales was met by imported cigarettes in each of those periods.
The information available on quantities of cigarettes released for consumption in United Kingdom as compiled by Her Majesty's Customs and Excise is as follows:
| Quantities of cigarettes released for home consumption | ||
| Total clearances | Proportion accounted for by imports | |
| Million | Per cent. | |
| 1980–81 | 119,185 | 1·5 |
| 1985–86 | 96,304 | 11·0 |
| 1986–87 April-June | 13,190 | 8·1 |
Source: Her Majesty's Customs and Excise.
Chemical Exports (Iraq)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will list in the Official Report the chemicals which are on the restricted list for export to Iraq.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
Lawnmowers (Noise)
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what advice he is providing to retailers about the steps which they should take in relation to lawnmowers in stock at the time of implementation of the Lawnmowers (Harmonisation of Noise Emission Standards) Regulations 1986; and if he will make a statement.
The Lawnmowers (Harmonisation of Noise Emission Standards) Regulations 1986 applies to lawnmowers manufactured on or after 1 July 1987. Retailers existing stock at the time of implementation will therefore not be affected.
Retailers association along with other interested organisations are kept informed of the progress of the lawnmowers directive and the regulations through our normal general circulars.
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if batch sampling of new lawnmowers will be permitted after the implementing of the Lawnmowers (Harmonisation of Noise Emission Standards) Regulations.
I shall reply to my hon. Friend as soon as possible.
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement outlining the policy objectives which Her Majesty's Government are seeking to achieve by making the Lawnmowers (Harmonisation of Noise Emission Standards) Regulations 1986.
The regulations arise from the requirement on the United Kingdom to implement EC directive 84/538/EEC. The directive removes those technical barriers to trade between member states which arise because member states have different national rules on noise levels which they apply to lawnmowers. Thus, the UK policy objective of the regulations is to gain the advantage for British lawnmower manufacturers of guaranteed access to markets in member states without having to comply with many different standards. It is also part of the general UK policy to complete the internal market by 1992. This policy was affirmed by heads of member states at the treaty conference in December 1985.
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what estimate he has made of the cost to public funds in travel and accommodation of public servants during the negotiations in the EEC of the directive on lawnmower harmonisation of noise emission standards; and how many official and ministerial meetings took place in the course of negotiations.
No such estimate can be made. The lawnmowers proposal was one of a package adopted in 1984 and was negotiated (over a number of years) together with others in a sometimes sporadic fashion. Meetings attended by United Kingdom officials usually covered more than just the lawnmowers proposal.
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many testing centres he plans to authorise to conduct tests in accordance with the Lawnmowers (Harmonisation of Noise Emission Standards) Regulations 1986; and what criteria he will apply in determining the location of such centres.
Nine test laboratories have already been appointed to carry out tests. Any test organisation can apply to be appointed and one of the criteria for appointment is satisfying the national measurement accreditation service requirements. There are no criteria for determining the location of the laboratories.
asked the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1) what steps he is taking to control the level of charges levied for testing lawnmowers under the Lawnmowers (Harmonisation of Noise Emission Standards) Regulations 1986; and if he will make a statement;
(2) what estimate he has made of the additional costs which will be required to be borne by the lawnmower manufacturing industry in consequence of the Lawnmowers (Harmonisation of Noise Emission Standards) Regulations 1986; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 3 November 1986]: The additional cost to manufacturers will depend largely on the extent to which their lawnmowers already meet the specified noise levels.The Lawnmower (Harmonisation of Noise Emission Standards) Regulations 1986 implements the European Communities article 100 directive, which was adopted in September 1984 and comes into force on 1 July 1987. The purpose of this directive is to harmonise member states' laws relating to the permissible sound power level of certain categories of lawnmower. Prior to being placed onto the market, lawnmowers will have to be tested and certified to show they conform to the requirements of the directive. Conforming products will have free access to the Community market. Obviously it is hoped that the advantages to be gained by the United Kingdom's Lawnmower industry from a more open Community market will outweigh the initial additional costs.With regard to the control of charges for tests, my Department has agreed with the manufacturers and the appointed test laboratories to allow for market forces to dictate the charges. Manufacturers are therefore able to shop around and negotiate an acceptable price.
Environment
Sports Ministers (Conference)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the outcome of the fifth conference of European Ministers responsible for sport.
The United Kingdom was represented by officials from the Department and the director general of the Sports Council. The agenda was divided into two themes: progress in European sports co-operation 1984–1986; and items of current political concern. A number of resolutions were adopted, all of which were acceptable to the United Kingdom.In particular, the conference agreed on the need to extend the impact of the European anti-doping charter for sport adopted at the last conference in Malta in 1984. Doping remains one of the intractable problems facing sport today. Although the ultimate sanction lies with the national and international sports federations, Governments can and should help through concerted international action. To this end the conference welcomed the positive contribution made by the Canadian Minister of Sport, and his offer to act as an intermediary to spread the Council of Europe's-and Canada's-work to other nations, including the United States of America and the Eastern block.Another important agenda item was apartheid in sports. On the point of principle there was nothing between us: we all abhor apartheid and wish to see it ended in South Africa.There were, however, differences — inspired by differences of constitution — in the way Governments viewed their locus in trying to prevent sporting contacts with South Africa. The resolution adopted is acceptable to the United Kingdom, and is compatible with Commonwealth and Her Majesty's Government's policy on sporting contacts with South Africa as enshrined in the "Gleneagles Agreement."There was a useful discussion about the operation of the European convention on spectator violence and misbehaviour at sports events. Continuing political impetus was given to the work on violence associated with sport in general, and in particular to a study of the reasons behind violence with an aim to prevention.The conference also adopted resolutions on ways to increase the impact of "Sport for All" policies with reference to participation by specific target groups. In particular, it endorsed the "European Charter for Sport for All: Disabled Persons"; and passed a resolution on "Sport for Prisoners and Young Delinquents". The conference agreed more generally the need to assess ways in which healthy participation for all might be promoted in a co-ordinated European programme through the study of injuries and their prevention.Conference also supported resolutions on: international sports competitions, recognising that Governments share some concern for the wider implications of staging of major sports events; new partnerships in sport, conscious of the respective roles of Government, sport, commerce and media to the development of sport , sport and the environment, recognising the importance of reconciling sporting and environmental interests when and where these are in conflict; the 1988 Olympic Games, reaffirming support for the Olympic movement both now and in the future; and the future activities of the Council of Europe in the field of sport.I shall place copies of these resolutions in the Library once the final texts have been issued by the conference secretariat.
Noise
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will arrange for his Department to collect and publish information on the percentage of the British population exposed to (a) road traffic noise and (b) aircraft noise.
The "Digest of Environmental Protection and Water Statistics", published annually by my Department and available in the Library of the House, includes statistics relating to noise from road traffic and aircraft. While my Department's research programme includes studies aimed at identifying more precisely the nature and scale of noise nuisance from various sources, we have no plans to expand these statistics at present.
Rate Support Grant
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment how many changes have been made in the contents and method of calculating rate support grant for 1987–88.
The Secretary of States proposals for the 1987–88 rate support grant settlement were set out in his consultation paper issued on 3 October, copies of which are in the Library. By comparison with the 1986–87 settlement, substantial increases are proposed in the provision for local authority expenditure, and in the aggregate amount available for grant. A number of changes in the method of distributing grant are also proposed.
Travellers Caravans
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will set out the number of travellers caravans on (a) authorised and (b) unauthorised sites in (i) Greater London and (ii) the London borough of Greenwich as revealed by the July 1986 census.
Returns were received from 31 out of the 32 London boroughs. The figures are:
| Caravans on authorised sites | Caravans on unauthorised sites | |
| Greater London | 598 | 413 |
| London Borough of Greenwich | 78 | 66 |
Mrs B Johnston
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when the hon. Member for Rugby and Kenilworth can expect a reply to his two letters of 1 May and 25 July with reference to Mrs. B. Johnston of Age Concern, Rugby.
My hon. Friend's letter of 1 May was received in the Department and was identified as a matter for which the Department of Health and Social Security has responsibility. The correspondence then appears to have gone astray in the process of arranging its transfer. The Department can find no record of the further letter of 25 July. I apologise unreservedly for any difficulty that may have been caused to my hon. Friend, and I shall write to him so that we can now deal speedily with the issues raised by him and his constituent.
Grant-Related Expenditure
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish the percentage change in grant-related expenditure for each local authority between 1986–87 and 1987–88, ranked from biggest increase to biggest decrease.
The figures are as follows:
| Per cent. change 1986–87 to 1987–88 | |
| Provisional GREs | |
| City of London | 47·8 |
| West Yorkshire Police | 23·6 |
| Merseyside Police | 21·6 |
| Easington | 18·4 |
| South Yorkshire Police | 13·5 |
| Greater Manchester Police | 12·0 |
| South Yorkshire Fire | 11·1 |
| Tyne & Wear Fire | 9·6 |
| West Yorkshire Fire | 9·4 |
| Metropolitan Police | 9·0 |
| Merseyside PTA | 8·9 |
| Greater Manchester Fire | 8·9 |
| Merseyside Fire | 8·7 |
| West Midlands Fire | 8·3 |
| Newham | 8·2 |
| West Midlands PTA | 7·8 |
| Greater London Fire | 7·6 |
Provisional GREs
| |
| Northumberland | 7·1 |
| Derbyshire | 6·6 |
| Suffolk | 6·6 |
| Hounslow | 6·2 |
| Cornwall | 6·1 |
| Dorset | 6·1 |
| Greater Manchester PTA | 6·1 |
| Gloucestershire | 6·0 |
| Lincolnshire | 6·0 |
| Lancashire | 5·7 |
| Cambridgeshire | 5·7 |
| Islington | 5·7 |
| Norfolk | 5·7 |
| Buckinghamshire | 5·6 |
| Tower Hamlets | 5·5 |
| Staffordshire | 5·5 |
| Cheshire | 5·3 |
| Essex | 5·3 |
| Cleveland | 5·3 |
| Leicestershire | 5·3 |
| North Yorkshire | 5·3 |
| Somerset | 3·5 |
| Durham | 5·3 |
| Warwickshire | 5·2 |
| West Sussex | 5·2 |
| Wandsworth | 5·2 |
| Berkshire | 5·1 |
| Waltham Forest | 5·1 |
| Devon | 5·1 |
| Kent | 5·0 |
| Brent | 5·0 |
| Surrey | 5·0 |
| Humberside | 4·9 |
| Cumbria | 4·9 |
| Hackney | 4·8 |
| South Tyneside | 4·8 |
| Nottinghamshire | 4·7 |
| Barking and Dagenham | 4·7 |
| Sefton | 4·7 |
| Oxfordshire | 4·7 |
| Northamptonshire | 4·7 |
| Wiltshire | 4·6 |
| Lambeth | 4·6 |
| Shropshire | 4·6 |
| Sheffield | 4·6 |
| Bradford | 4·5 |
| Hereford and Worcester | 4·5 |
| Avon | 4·5 |
| Sunderland | 4·4 |
| Enfield | 4·4 |
| Birmingham | 4·4 |
| West Yorkshire PTA | 4·3 |
| Hillingdon | 4·3 |
| Wolverhampton | 4·3 |
| Bedfordshire | 4·3 |
| Hertfordshire | 4·3 |
| Hampshire | 4·3 |
| Bexley | 4·2 |
| East Sussex | 4·2 |
| Wigan | 4·2 |
| Redbridge | 4·1 |
| Kingston-upon-Thames | 4·0 |
| Wakefield | 4·0 |
| Rotherham | 4·0 |
| Bury | 3·9 |
| Dudley | 3·9 |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | 3·9 |
| Sandwell | 3·8 |
| South Yorkshire PTA | 3·8 |
| Knowsley | 3·8 |
| Kirklees | 3·7 |
| Havering | 3·7 |
| Stockport | 3·7 |
| ILEA | 3·6 |
| Camden | 3·5 |
| Salford | 3·5 |
Provisional GREs
| |
| Croydon | 3·5 |
| Coventry | 3·5 |
| Rochdale | 3·5 |
| Bolton | 3·5 |
| Calderdale | 3·5 |
| Richmond-upon-Thames | 3·5 |
| Manchester | 3·4 |
| Isle of Wight | 3·4 |
| Bromley | 3·4 |
| Merton | 3·4 |
| Walsall | 3·4 |
| Doncaster | 3·4 |
| North Tyneside | 3·3 |
| Barnet | 3·3 |
| Ealing | 3·3 |
| Barnsley | 3·2 |
| Oldham | 3·2 |
| Harrow | 3·2 |
| Haringey | 3·1 |
| Solihull | 3·1 |
| Sutton | 3·1 |
| St Helens | 3·0 |
| Trafford | 3·0 |
| Westminster | 2·9 |
| Leeds | 2·7 |
| Tameside | 2·6 |
| Ashford | 2·5 |
| Wirral | 2·4 |
| Gateshead | 2·0 |
| Liverpool | 1·8 |
| Greenwich | 1·7 |
| Southwark | 0·8 |
| Blackpool | 0·7 |
| South Holland | 0·2 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 0·2 |
| Lewisham | 0·0 |
| West Midlands Police | -0·2 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | -1·1 |
| Eastbourne | -1·1 |
| Boston | -1·4 |
| Horsham | -1·7 |
| Thamesdown | -1·9 |
| Bassetlaw | -2·3 |
| South Shropshire | -2·5 |
| Warrington | -2·7 |
| King's Lynn and West Norfolk | -3·0 |
| Plymouth | -3·1 |
| Stockton-on-Tees | -3·2 |
| Hinckley and Bosworth | -3·3 |
| Welwyn Hatfield | -3·4 |
| Tendring | -3·4 |
| Barrow in Furness | -3·5 |
| North Cornwall | -3·6 |
| Huntingdon | -3·7 |
| Broxbourne | -3·8 |
| Thurrock | -3·8 |
| Lancaster | -3·8 |
| Torbay | -3·9 |
| Fylde | -4·0 |
| Fenland | -4·0 |
| Blackburn | -4·1 |
| Mansfield | -4·1 |
| Poole | -4·1 |
| Bracknell | -4·3 |
| West Somerset | -4·3 |
| West Derbyshire | -4·4 |
| Peterborough | -4·4 |
| Forest Heath | -4·4 |
| Preston | -4·5 |
| Dacorum | -4·5 |
| South Lakeland | -4·5 |
| Wellingborough | -4·5 |
| Wimborne | -4·6 |
| North Hertfordshire | -4·6 |
| Crawley | -4·6 |
| Halton | -4·7 |
Provisional GREs
| |
| Shepway | -4·7 |
| St. Albans | -4·7 |
| East Devon | -4·7 |
| West Oxfordshire | -4·7 |
| Middlesbrough | -4·8 |
| Southampton | -4·8 |
| East Hertfordshire | -4·8 |
| South Hams | -4·8 |
| Northumbria Police | -4·9 |
| New Forest | -4·9 |
| Harrogate | -4·9 |
| Bournemouth | -5·0 |
| Kingswood | ·5·0 |
| Worcester | -5·0 |
| Thanet | -5·0 |
| Rushcliffe | -5·0 |
| Carlisle | -5·0 |
| Rossendale | -5·0 |
| East Lindsey | -5·0 |
| North Kesteven | -5·1 |
| Weymouth and Portland | -5·1 |
| Boothferry | -5·1 |
| Oxford | -5·2 |
| Stratford on Avon | -5·2 |
| Durham | -5·2 |
| Sedgefield | -5·3 |
| Teignbridge | -5·3 |
| South Kesteven | -5·3 |
| Gosport | -5·3 |
| Erewash | -5·3 |
| Rutland | -5·4 |
| Penwith | -5·4 |
| York | -5·4 |
| Selby | -5·4 |
| North Dorset | -5·4 |
| Watford | -5·4 |
| Harborough | -5·4 |
| Portsmouth | -5·5 |
| Brighton | -5·5 |
| Christchurch | -5·5 |
| Great Yarmouth | -5·5 |
| Wear Valley | -5·5 |
| Craven | -5·5 |
| East Cambridgeshire | -5·5 |
| Eden | -5·5 |
| Breckland | -5·6 |
| Hastings | -5·6 |
| Norwich | -5·6 |
| Stevenage | -5·6 |
| Blyth Valley | -5·6 |
| Colchester | -5·6 |
| West Dorset | -5·6 |
| Ashfield | -5·7 |
| Stoke-on-Trent | -5·7 |
| Vale of White Horse | -5·7 |
| Oswestry | -5·7 |
| Blaby | -5·7 |
| Scarborough | -5·7 |
| Redditch | -5·7 |
| Richmondshire | -5·7 |
| Lewes | -5·7 |
| Lincoln | -5·7 |
| South Bedfordshire | -5·8 |
| Rochford | -5·8 |
| Wychavon | -5·8 |
| Hereford | -5·8 |
| Fareham | -5·8 |
| Southend-on-Sea | -5·9 |
| Maldon | -5·9 |
| Nottingham | -5·9 |
| Shrewsbury and Atcham | -5·9 |
| Wyre | -5·9 |
| St. Edmundsbury | -5·9 |
| Adur | -5·9 |
| Winchester | -5·9 |
| Chorley | -5·9 |
Provisional GREs
| |
| Rother | -5·9 |
| Reading | -5·9 |
| Newbury | -6·0 |
| Melton | -6·0 |
| Alnwick | -6·0 |
| Three Rivers | -6·0 |
| Wokingham | -6·0 |
| Derby | -6·0 |
| Gelding | -6·0 |
| Cheltenham | -6·0 |
| Bath | -6·0 |
| South Cambridgeshire | -6·0 |
| Northampton | -6·0 |
| Darlington | -60 |
| Canterbury | -6·0 |
| Chester | -6·1 |
| Berwick-upon-Tweed | -6·1 |
| Carrick | -6·1 |
| Tynedale | -6·1 |
| Restormel | -6·1 |
| Chesterfield | -6·1 |
| Hertsmere | -6·1 |
| Stafford | -6·2 |
| Windsor and Maidenhead | -6·2 |
| Babergh | -6·2 |
| Gloucester | -6·2 |
| Congleton | -6·2 |
| South Norfolk | -6·2 |
| Stroud | -6·2 |
| Glandord | -6·2 |
| Pendle | -6·3 |
| North Devon | -6·3 |
| North West Leicestershire | -6·3 |
| Harlow | -6·3 |
| Worthing | -6·3 |
| Epping Forest | -6·3 |
| Waverley | -6·4 |
| Suffolk Coastal | -6·4 |
| Macclesfield | -6·4 |
| Cambridge | -6·4 |
| Ryedale | -6·4 |
| Salisbury | -6·4 |
| Ipswich | -6·4 |
| Cannock Chase | -6·4 |
| Rugby | -6·4 |
| Mendip | -6·4 |
| Epsom and Ewell | -6·4 |
| East Hampshire | -6·4 |
| Reigate and Banstead | -6·4 |
| Woodspring | -6·5 |
| Eastleigh | -6·5 |
| Chichester | -6·5 |
| Sedgemoor | -6·5 |
| Cherwell | -6·5 |
| Burnley | -6·5 |
| Forest of Dean | -6·5 |
| Cotswold | -6·6 |
| North Shropshire | -6·6 |
| Purbeck | -6·6 |
| North Wiltshire | -6·6 |
| North Bedfordshire | -6·6 |
| Brain tree | -6·7 |
| North Norfolk | -6·7 |
| Tandridge | -6·7 |
| South Somerset | -6·7 |
| West Wiltshire | -6·7 |
| Arun | -6·7 |
| Guildford | -6·7 |
| Lichfield | -6·7 |
| Oadby and Wigston | -6·7 |
| Torridge | -6·8 |
| Caradon | -6·8 |
| Mid Sussex | -6·8 |
| Rushmoor | -6·8 |
| Vale Royal | -6·8 |
| Waveney | -6·8 |
Provisional GREs
| |
| Bridgnorth | -6·9 |
| Charnwood | -6·9 |
| Northavon | -6·9 |
| South Ribble | -6·9 |
| Mid Devon | -6·9 |
| Crewe and Nantwich | -7·0 |
| Tonbridge and Mailing | -7·0 |
| Newcastle-under-Lyme | -7·0 |
| East Northamptonshire | -7·0 |
| South Derbyshire | -7·0 |
| West Devon | -7·0 |
| Warwick | -7·1 |
| Cleethorpes | -7·1 |
| Bristol | -7·1 |
| Exeter | -7·1 |
| Wealden | -7·1 |
| South Oxfordshire | -7·1 |
| Tyne and Wear PTA | -7·2 |
| Wansbeck | -7·2 |
| Daventry | -7·2 |
| Wansdyke | -7·2 |
| Medina | -7·2 |
| Kerrier | -7·2 |
| Dover | -7·2 |
| Gillingham | -7·2 |
| Woking | -7·2 |
| Mid Bedfordshire | -7·3 |
| Elmbridge | -7·3 |
| West Lindsey | -7·3 |
| Brentwood | -7·3 |
| Swale | -7·3 |
| Test Valley | -7·3 |
| Surrey Heath | -7·4 |
| Nuneaton and Bedworth | -7·4 |
| Aylesbury Vale | -7·4 |
| Derwentside | -7·5 |
| Newark | -7·5 |
| Broadland | -7·5 |
| East Yorkshire | -7·5 |
| South Staffordshire | -7·5 |
| Wyre Forest | -7·5 |
| East Staffordshire | -7·6 |
| Castle Point | -7·6 |
| Spelthorne | -7·6 |
| Chester-le-Street | -7·6 |
| Slough | -7·7 |
| Hambleton | -7·7 |
| Bromsgrove | -7·7 |
| Beverley | -7·7 |
| Malvern Hills | -7·7 |
| High Peak | -7·7 |
| Chelmsford | -7·7 |
| Leominster | -7·7 |
| South Wight | -7·7 |
| Maidstone | -7·8 |
| Uttlesford | -7·8 |
| Holderness | -7·8 |
| Broxtowe | -7·8 |
| Rochester upon Medway | -7·8 |
| The Wrekin | -7·9 |
| Castle Morpeth | -7·9 |
| Taunton Deane | -7·9 |
| Hartlepool | -8·0 |
| Mole Valley | -8·0 |
| Amber Valley | -8·0 |
| Hove | -8·0 |
| West Lancashire | -8·1 |
| Great Grimsby | -8·1 |
| Basingstoke and Deane | -8·1 |
| Kettering | -8·1 |
| Dartford | -8·1 |
| North Warwickshire | -8·1 |
| Basildon | -8·2 |
| Tunbridge Wells | -8·2 |
| Copeland | -8·2 |
| Scunthorpe | -8·4 |
Provisional GREs
| |
| Leicester | -8·4 |
| Tewkesbury | -8·4 |
| Gravesham | -8·4 |
| Teesdale | -8·5 |
| Havant | -8·6 |
| Milton Keynes | -8·7 |
| Runnymede | -8·7 |
| South Northamptonshire | -8·7 |
| Corby | -8·8 |
| Chiltern | -8·8 |
| North East Derbyshire | -8·8 |
| Kennet | -8·9 |
| South Bucks | -8·9 |
| Hart | -9·0 |
| Ribble Valley | -9·0 |
| Tamworth | -9·0 |
| Ellesmere Port and Neston | -9·1 |
| Sevonoaks | -9·1 |
| Langbaurgh | -9·1 |
| Allerdale | -9·3 |
| Luton | -9·3 |
| Kingston upon Hull | -9·5 |
| South Herefordshire | -9·6 |
| Staffordshire Moorlands | -10·2 |
| Wycombe | -10·5 |
| Bolsover | -10·6 |
| Mid Suffolk | -11·6 |
| Hyndburn | -13·2 |
| Isles of Scilly | -19·5 |
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what was (a) the total and (b) the percentage year-on-year change in the grant-related expenditure of (i) the Inner London education authority and (ii) the Metropolitan police, in each year from 1981–82.
The figures are as follows:
| Inner London education authority | Metropolitan police | |||
| Percentage change on previous year | Percentage change on previous year | |||
| £ million | per cent. | £ million | per cent. | |
| 1981–82 | 468·477 | — | 273·606 | — |
| 1982–83 | 509·273 | +8·7 | 327·191 | +19·6 |
| 1983–84 | 516·489 | +1·4 | 345·921 | +5·7 |
| 1984–85 | 533·033 | +3·2 | 366·547 | +6·0 |
| 1985–86 | 556·388 | +4·4 | 384·948 | +5·0 |
| 1986–87 | 545·294 | +2·0 | 421·270 | +9·4 |
| 11987–88 | 564·731 | +3·6 | 459·352 | +9·0 |
| 1 Provisional· | ||||
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish the national grant-related expenditure assessments of London Regional Transport in 1985–86, 1986–87 and 1987–88, consistent with the grant-related poundage reduction for spending at grant-related expenditure shown for each year; and if he will list the reasons for the changes between the years.
The notional grant-related expenditure assessments (GREs) for London Regional Transport (LRT) in 1985–86, 1986–87 and 1987–88 are as follows:
| £ million | |
| 1985–86 | 292·3 |
| 1986–87 | 489·3 |
| 11987–88 | 365·6 |
| 1 Provisional. | |
The increase in the notional GRE from 1985–86 to 1986–87 was due mainly to the introduction in 1986–87 of a new element relating to London Underground services, following a change made to the notional GRE formula to take account of rail services other than British Rail services supported under section 20 of the Transport Act 1968.
The fall in GRE in 1987–88 reflects the proposed change in the method of calculating the cost of financing LRT capital to bring it into line with the way that local authority capital expenditure is treated in GREs generally.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will publish (a) the total current expenditure and (b) total capital expenditure of each residuary body in 1986–87;(2) if he will publish the relevant, total, current and grant-related expenditure of local authorities in total at plan, budget and at all later stages in each year from 1981–82 to 1987–88, estimated.
I shall answer these questions shortly.
Local Government Finance
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish the responses to Cmnd. 9714, "Paying for Local Government"; and if he plans to publish a further White Paper on the subject of local government finance.
I do not have the permission of respondents to publish their views. I shall, however, publish a summary of the representations received in due course. Further statements of Government policy on this subject will be made as and when appropriate.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will estimate the total cost to his Department of all preparatory work, both internal and external, and subsequent costs of the Green Paper, "Paying for Local Government" (Cmnd. 9714).
The costs attributable to the division in my Department responsible for the Green Paper between 1 November 1984 and 30 September 1986 were £773,100. This includes the cost of salaries, travel and subsistence, stationery, typing, cartographic, printing and computing services.
Rate Support Grant (Hertfordshire)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment what recent discussions he has had with the Hertfordshire county council regarding its level of rate support grant; and if he will make a statement.
My hon. Friend the Minister for Local Government has agreed to meet a delegation from Hertfordshire county council on Thursday 6 November to discuss the RSG settlement.
Newham (Direct Labour Organisation)
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment whether, following his request for a special report on Newham's direct labour organisation, he has reached a decision on that organisation's future.
The special report provided by the London borough of Newham shows that Newham's direct labour organisation made losses on major new construction schemes totalling some £3·3 million over the period 1982–83 to 1984–85 with a loss in 1984–85 alone of over £2 million. The council has stopped awarding new major construction projects to its DLO for the time being, but despite this anticipates a further loss of around £2 million in 1985–86.Having considered the report my right hon. Friend has today informed the borough, in accordance with his powers under section 17(5) of the Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980, that with immediate effect its direct labour organisation shall no longer have power to undertake major new building work except as necessary to complete work already awarded to it.
asked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish the total of local authorities' capital receipts at the end of each financial year from 1981–82 to 1985–86, showing the proportion of receipts backed by cash.
Local authorities' capital receipts against the DOE-LA1 cash limit in each of the years 1981–82 to 1985–86, including receipts from health authorities and repayments of grants and advances, were as follows:
| £ million | |
| 1981–82 | 1,335 |
| 1982–83 | 2,235 |
| 1983–84 | 2,230 |
| 1984–85 | 2,150 |
| 1985–86 | 2,318 |
Northern Ireland
Health Services
asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will give the revenue expenditure on health and community health services for each year from 1974–75 giving information adjusted by (a) the gross domestic product deflator, (b) National Health Service pay and prices and (c) the gross domestic product retail price index for Northern Ireland.
The information requested is as follows:
Health and personal social services expenditure
| ||||
£ million
| ||||
Cash adjusted (at 1985–86°1) prices) by:
| ||||
Cash
| GDP deflator
| HPSS pay and price factors 1
| RPI 2
| |
| 1974–75 | 108 | 366 | 385 | 360 |
| 1975–76 | 154 | 414 | 430 | 410 |
| 1976–77 | 179 | 426 | 440 | 414 |
| 1977–78 | 202 | 421 | 455 | 409 |
| 1978–79 | 234 | 441 | 481 | 438 |
| 1978–79 | 289 | 467 | 496 | 468 |
| 1980–81 | 373 | 508 | 506 | 519 |
| 1981–82 | 420 | 520 | 523 | 524 |
| 1982–83 | 452 | 522 | 527 | 526 |
| 1983–84 | 485 | 536 | 538 | 539 |
| 1984–85 | 508 | 539 | 535 | 538 |
| 1985–86 | 537 | 537 | 537 | 537 |
| 1986–87 | 569 | 549 | n.a.2 | n a.2 |
1 There is no separate Health Service Index or Retail Price Index for Northern Ireland, and national indices have therefore been used. | ||||
2 Indices not yet available. | ||||
Home Department
New Prison, Arncott
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will give an estimated timetable of the construction of the new prison at Arncott.
The construction of the new prison at Arncott (Bicester) is planned to commence in the autumn of 1987 and to be completed in the latter half of 1991.
Operation Condor
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if he will provide figures detailing arrests resulting from the searches conducted at the Afro-Caribbean Club and other property and premises searched during Operation Condor;(2) how many people were arrested as a result of Operation Condor directly; and how many were arrested and subsequently charged with public order offences.
I understand from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis that there were 86 arrests on 24 July arising from Operation Condor. None of those arrested was subsequently charged with any public order offence.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many locations other than the Afro-Caribbean Club were searched by the police as part of Operation Condor; and if he will list these other locations.
I understand from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis that a total of 12 locations were searched under warrant, including the Afro-Caribbean Club. Eight of these locations were within the Brixton division and four elsewhere in south London. It would not be appropriate to publicise the addresses.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the number of arrests for the evening of 24 July in the police divisions which cover the London borough of Lambeth.
I understand from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis that during the period 4.30 pm to midnight, 43 people were arrested and taken to police stations within the Lambeth division. A further 37 people were arrested and taken to police stations outside the division.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many officers were used during Operation Condor; and if he will provide the information by rank and police division.
798. The officers were drawn from divisions and branches throughout the Metropolitan police district and it would be possible to give a breakdown by rank and division only at disproportionate cost.
Plastic Bullets (Lambeth)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department where plastic bullets are stored in Lambeth and in what quantities; what officers in Lambeth police district are trained in the use of plastic bullets; at what level decisions are made for their deployment; and what criteria are used in reaching a decision for deployment.
It is not the practice to disclose where in the Metropolitan police district plastic baton rounds are stored or which officers have been trained in their use. As to the other points raised, I would refer the hon. Member to the reply which my right hon. Friend gave to a question by my hon. Friend the Member for Lancashire, West (Mr. Hind) on 19 May 1986 (Official Report, columns 15–16.)
Alcohol Test Computers
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the implications of the use of breath check alcohol test computers, by private individuals, for road safety.
It is open to individuals to use such self-test equipment as they wish. The report of the Blennerhassett committee pointed out limitations of self-testing equipment, particularly that alcohol will be underestimated if a test is carried out before the alcohol consumed has been absorbed.
Conservative Party Conference
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he has conducted an analysis of the total security costs relating to the 1986 Conservative party conference in Bournemouth; what proportion of this will be borne by Her Majesty's Government; and whether he has any proposals to change the basis on which the costs of security at the major party conferences are funded.
We have not conducted such an analysis. 51 per cent. of expenditure incurred by the Dorset police authority on the policing of the conference will be met by the Home Office through police grant in the usual way. Block grant from the Department of the Environment makes a further contribution to the costs. There are no plans to make any special arrangements for the funding of such costs. Certain expenditure incurred by the Conservative party on security at the conference may qualify for reimbursement from central funds under the scheme announced by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister in her reply to a question by my right hon and learned Friend the Member for Southport (Sir I. Percival) on 25 July.
Deportation
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if, in the light of the information supplied by the hon. Member for Hartlepool, he will deport the individual named on the ground that his presence is not conducive to the public good; and if he will make a statement.
I am writing to the hon. Member.
Prisoners (Deaths)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) pursuant to the answer of 23 October, if he will break down the number of deaths for each year other than from natural causes, by cause and by coroner's verdict;(2) if he will list in each year from 1980 to 1985 the number of deaths from non-natural causes in each prison in England and Wales.
I will write to the hon. Member.
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he has had any representations in respect of the number of suicides in prisons; and if he will make a statement.
We receive very few representations about the number of suicides in prison. The interpretation of statistics on prison suicide was one of the issues considered in the report of the Working Group on Suicide Prevention, published on 5 September.
Crimes And Offences (Fines)
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department what are the current maximum fines which can be imposed by the courts for (a) soliciting, (b) prostitution, (c) criminal damage, (d) drunk driving, (e) speeding, (f) assault and (g) selling lawnmowers which do not conform to the Lawnmowers (Harmonisation of Noise Emission Standards) Regulations; and what plans he has for reviewing the maximum levels of fines for crimes and offences.
The information requested is set out in the table, except as regards prostitution which in itself is not an offence. For the more serious offences of assault and criminal damage, imprisonment is also available as a sanction.We keep maximum penalties under constant review.
| Offence | Enactment | Maximum Fine |
| Soliciting (of male by female) | Section 1 of the Street Offences Act 1959 | Level 2 on the standard scale (£100) for first offence, level 3 (£400) for second or subsequent offence. |
| Soliciting (of male by male) | Section 32 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 | Statutory maximum (£2,000) if prosecuted summarily; unlimited fine on indictment. |
Offence
| Enactment
| Maximum Fine
|
| Persistent soliciting of women/kerb crawling | Sections 1 and 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 1985 | Level 3 on standard scale (£400). |
| Criminal Damage | Section 1 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 (for damage of more than £400); (for damage of £400 or less). | Unlimited fine on indictment; statutory maximum (£2,000) when tried summarily.Level 4 on the standard scale (£1,000). |
| Driving when unfit through drink/ with excess alcohol | Sections 5 (1) and 6{1)(a) of the Road Traffice Act 1972 | Level 5 on the standard scale (£2,000). |
| Exceeding speed limit | Section 89(1) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 | Level 3 on the standard scale (£400). |
| Common assault | Section 42 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 | Level 3 on the standard scale (£400). |
| Assault occasioning actual bodily harm | Section 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 | Unlimited fine on indictment; statutory maximum (£2,000) if tried summarily. |
| Sale of Lawnmowers contrary to the Lawnmowers (Harmonisation of Noise Emission Standards) Regulations 1986 | £1,000 | |
Scotland
Aids
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) how many cases of acquired immune
| Revenue Expenditure on Hospital and Community Health Services | ||||
| £ million | ||||
| Cash | Adjusted to 1985–86 prices by GDP Deflator | Adjusted to 1985–86 prices by NHS pay and prices index | Adjusted to 1985–86 prices by Retail Price Index | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| 1974–75 | 317 | 1,074 | 1,152 | 1,055 |
| 1975–76 | 414 | 1,115 | 1,167 | 1,104 |
| 1976–77 | 470 | 1,118 | 1,164 | 1,087 |
| 1977–78 | 540 | 1,128 | 1,231 | 1,096 |
| 1978–79 | 616 | 1,162 | 1,281 | 1,153 |
| 1979–80 | 736 | 1,188 | 1,270 | 1,190 |
| 1980–81 | 949 | 1,292 | 1,280 | 1,320 |
| 1981–82 | 1,063 | 1,317 | 1,325 | 1,326 |
| 1982–83 | 1,136 | 1,312 | 1,329 | 1,323 |
| 1983–84 | 1,205 | 1,333 | 1,342 | 1,341 |
| 1984–85 | 1,285 | 1,362 | 1,352 | 1,361 |
| 1985–861 | 1,358 | 1,358 | 1,358 | 1,358 |
| 1 Provisional | ||||
Chernobyl (Warnings)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what action he intends to take in the light of the report by Mr. David Webster on the performance of deficiency syndrome were recorded in Scotland at the latest date for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement;(2) what information he has about the trend in the number of cases of acquired immune deficiency syndrome in Glasgow and the west of Scotland at the latest date for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement.
By 31 October, 13 cases of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) had been recorded in Scotland. Five of these were from Glasgow and the west of Scotland. It is not possible to establish trends from this small number of cases. The Government's public education compaign is intended to warn the public generally, and particularly groups at special risk, of the danger that AIDS presents to the whole population. We are continuing to give this serious disease our urgent attention.
Health Services
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will give the revenue expenditure on health and community health services each year from 1974–75 giving information adjusted by (a) the domestic product deflator, (b) National Health Service pay and prices and (c) the retail price index for Scotland.
The information is given in the table. No separate NHS pay and price factors are maintained for Scotland. The figures at column 3 have therefore been constructed using NHS pay and price index data maintained for England by the Department of Health and Social Security. The amounts at column 4 have been converted using the Retail Price Index, which is constructed on a United Kingdom basis. Since the RPI measures the movement in the cost of goods and services purchased by an average domestic household, it is not an appropriate indicator of cost movements in Health Service expenditure.Government agencies in giving advice to the public concerning dangers arising from radioactive fallout from Chernobyl; and if he will make a statement.
The Government are examining carefully their response to the Chernobyl accident to consider what lessons can be learnt from all aspects of the event, including the giving of advice and information to the public, for application in any possible future accident involving the release of radioactivity.
Torness (Survey)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland what will be the scope of the survey and data to be provided by the common services agency of the Scottish Health Service to the South of Scotland electricty board and the Lothian health board as a base line health survey in the area around Torness power station; what is the estimated cost of this survey; and if his Department will meet this cost.
The initial base line study of data for the area around Torness power station which will be conducted by the Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service is an examination of the incidence of all cancers in young persons (0–24 age group) and leukaemia and selected other cancers in adults in the period 1975–84 within 12·5 km and between 12·5 km and 25 km of the proposed reactor site.The analysis will make use of existing data sets and the cost (estimated to be about £550) of this initial study will be met by the Common Services Agency.
Social Services
Health Authorities (Membership)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how he intends to invite recommendations for membership of health authorities in the future.
In accordance with schedule 5 of the National Health Service Act 1977 we shall invite nominations by direct invitation to a number of specific interested bodies. As has been our practice in the past, we shall also invite hon. and right hon. Members to submit nominations, In accordance with the wishes of my right
| Number of deaths with underlying cause of carcinoma of cervix uteri (ICD1(9) 180 j to women usually resident in the Peterborough Health Areas 1979–1985 | |||||||
| age-group | |||||||
| Area of usual residence | Year | 15–24 | 25–44 | 45–54 | 55–64 | 65–74 | 75–84 |
| Peterborough Health District | |||||||
| 1979 | — | 2 | 2 | — | — | 1 | |
| 1980 | — | 1 | — | — | 2 | 1 | |
| 1981 | — | — | — | — | 2 | — | |
| Peterborough District Health Authority | |||||||
| 1982 | — | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 3 | |
| 1983 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | |
| 1984 | — | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1985 | — | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | |
| 1 International Classification of Diseases 9th revision. | |||||||
Housing Benefit
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish, in the same format as the answer of 5 July 1985, Official Report, columns 301–3, the latest available estimates of: (a) recipients of housing benefit not on supplementary benefit, (b) the numbers of households affected by the rent taper change to be introduce in April 1987 and (c) the number of households
hon. Friend the Prime Minister, we shall be seeking to appoint women to a larger proportion of the appointments than in the past. We shall also, of course, always seek to ensure that each health authority's membership reflects as far as possible the community it serves.
Royal Herbert Hospital, Woolwich
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how long the Royal Herbert hospital, Woolwich, hs been empty; what is the annual cost of maintaining the buildings; and what uses have been, or arc likely to be, considered for the site.
The Royal Herbert hospital at Woolwich is the responsibility of the South East Thames regional health authority, which is awaiting the result of an application for listed building consent for demolition. If successful, the planning permission already given for development will be put into action for disposal of the site. If consent is not obtained then alternative uses would have to be considered.I am informed that the hospital closed down at the end of 1979. £22,000 per year is spent on security and a minimal sum on maintenance.
Cervical Cancer
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish in the Official Report for the following age categories (a) 15 to 24 years, (b) 25 to 44 years, (c) 45 to 54 years, (d) 55 to 64 years, (e) 65 to 74 years and (f) 75 to 84 years, the number of deaths from cervical carcinoma in the Peterborough health authority for each year since 1979.
The information is shown in the table. Figures prior to 1982 are not comparable with those of later years as the Peterborough health district is not contermininous with the Peterborough district health authority.losing entitlement to rent rebates; if he will give information on the changes to the housing benefit needs allowance by publishing a table showing the April 1987 needs allowances and disregards and the level at which they would stand if the updating formula previously used were still in force; and if he will also publish a table giving a detailed breakdown of the numbers of households losing: (i) less than 26p, (ii) 26 to 50p, and (ii) 51p to £1 and such other ranges of losses as may be appropriate as a combined result of both the taper and needs allowance changes, distinguishing as far as possible between pensioners, working and other households.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Operating Department Assistants
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) if he will make a statement on the pay, conditions and hours of service of operating department assistants in the National Health Service;(2) if he will list in the
Official Report for each year since 1979 the number of operating department assistants leaving the service with the corresponding figures for recruitment.
Remuneration and conditions of service of operating department assistants are matters for the Professional and Technical Staffs `B' Whitley Council. A copy of the council handbook has been placed in the Library. Information about such staff leaving and entering the National Health Service is not collected centrally. Over the past few years the number of those employed in England has remained constant at around 2,700.
Pensions
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if, pursuant to the answer of 29 October, he will define the term "pay day" in relation to the timing of the payment of retirement pension; and what estimate he has made of the maximum amount which could be lost between a pensioners' qualifying birth date and the first relevant pay day.
The pay day is the day for each individual pensioner from which weekly sums of retirement pension become payable. The prescribed pay day for those retiring at present is Monday. Since pension is payable weekly in advance, the first pension payment is at most six days after the qualifying birthday and the date of retirement. The maximum difference is, therefore, six-sevenths of the weekly pension rate. However, pension is a weekly benefit and is never calculated on a daily basis.The Department's leaflet NP 32, a copy of which is in the Library and which is sent automatically to all pensioners some three months before they reach pensionable age, advises pensioners that any delay between the date of retirement and the first pension pay day can be avoided by choosing the pension pay day as the date of retirement.
Resource Allocation Working Party
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will make a statement on the progress of the resource allocation working party review.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Twickenham (Mr. Jessel) on 21 October 1986 at column 854.
Aids
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what steps he is taking to ensure that the public are better aware of the dangers of acquired immune deficiency syndrome, and how to avoid the risk of becoming infected by the virus.
I refer my hon. Friend the my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Stockport (Mr. Favell) on 28 October 1986 at column 123.
General Household Survey
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will publish the result of the 1985 general household survey questionnaire section on carers on pages 46 to 57 inclusive.
Analysis of the 1985 general household survey questionnaire section on carers will be published in the 1985 general household survey report which is expected to be ready at the end of next year.
Health Services
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will give the revenue expenditure on health and community health services for each year from 1974–75 giving information adjusted by (a) the gross domestic product deflator, (b) National Health Service pay and prices and (c) the retail price index for (i) England and (ii) Wales.
I shall let the hon. Member have a reply as soon as possible.
Artificial Limbs (Review)
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when he expects to respond to the detailed recommendations of the McColl Committee on its review of the artificial limbs and appliances services; and if he will make a statement.
I refer my hon. Friend to my reply to the right hon. Member for Manchester, Wythenshawe (Mr. Morris) on 29 October 1986 at column 187.
Mentally Handicapped Children
asked the Secretary of State for Social Services (1) how many mentally handicapped children remain in long-stay hospitals;(2) when he expect his Department's information paper on mentally handicapped children in long-stay hospitals to be published;(3) if he will set a date for letting all mentally handicapped children out of long-stay hospitals and into appropriate community facilities; and if he will make a statement;(4) if he will meet representations from Exodus, the organisation pressing to bring mentally handicapped children out of long-stay hospitals; and if he will make a statement;(5) when he last consulted with regional health authority chairmen about transferring all mentally handicapped children from long-stay hospitals to the community; and what conclusions were reached;(6) how many mentally handicapped children have been transferred from long-stay hospitals to the community in each of the last seven years; and if he is satisfied that adequate community provision has been made for them.
[pursuant to her reply, 22 October, columns 905–6]: Mental handicap hospitals and units are not classified by the length of time residents stay. At 31 December 1985 there were 585 children aged under 16 years resident in National Health Service mental handicap hospitals and hospital units, and a further 293 children resident in small National Health Service mental handicap units in the community. The figures include children admitted for short-term care or assessment, and those who spend part of their time at home and part in a National Health Service unit. Separate figures are not available centrally for these categories of residents, nor are the numbers of children discharged from mental handicap hospitals into the community. However, the total number of discharges (including transfers) from mental handicap hospitals and units included in the DHSS booklets "Mental health Statistics for England" (copies in the Library) show that the great majority of these follow lengths of stay of less than six months, which could be for assessment, short-term treatment, or family respite care. Discharges after a longer stay may be for resettlement in the community, and these were as follows:—
| Children aged under 16 discharged from National Health Service mental handicap hospitals, with duration of stay one year or more. | |
| Year | Number |
| 1979 | 166 |
| 1980 | 169 |
| 1981 | 139 |
| 1982 | 141 |
| 1983 | 135 |
| 1984 | 110 |
| 1985 | 122 |
Energy
Nuclear Power Generation
asked the Secretary of State for Energy what estimate he has of the number of people directly and indirectly employed in nuclear power generation.
The CEGB and SSEB currently employ over 11,000 people directly for nuclear power generation. Both the UKAEA and BNFL also generate electricity from some of their nuclear plant, but given the nature of their respective operations it is not possible to give a precise figure for the numbers employed in the generation of electricity. Overall, the nuclear industry directly employs about 44,000 people. Many thousands more are employed on the industry's major capital projects, in maintaining and servicing the industry's existing sites and in providing local infrastructure. Well over 100,000 jobs depend directly or indirectly on the industry.
Prime Minister
Bournemouth
Q79.
asked the Prime Minister when she last visited Bournemouth in an offical capacity.
On Monday 6 October, when I visited the site of the new Bournemouth district general hospital.
Scotland (Oil-Related Activity)
Q86.
asked the Prime Minister if she will make a statement on the current level of oil-related economic activity in Scotland.
The production of oil from the United Kingdom continental shelf is continuing at a broadly constant level. Daily average production expressed in million barrels per day was 2·692 during January 1986 and 2·508 during August 1986, with an average over the eight months of 2·525. The level of development and exploration of new fields is lower as a result of retrenchment by companies in reaction to low oil prices. This downturn in offshore activities has resulted in reduced demand for equipment, goods and services, particularly in the fabrication and supply companies, many of which are based in Scotland. Various proposals for fiscal and other measures have been put to the Government by the oil industry and others and these are being considered.
Engagements
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 4 November.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 4 November.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagments for Tuesday 4 November.
asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 4 November.
This morning I had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in this House I shall be having further meetings later today. This evening I hope to have an audience of Her Majesty The Queen.
Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs
Reykjavik Summit
45.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what consultations took place between his Department and the United States Administration concerning the arms control position adopted by the United States Government at Reykjavik.
In addition to the usual and continuous process of Alliance consultation, senior United States officials briefed the North Atlantic Council shortly before the Reykjavik meeting. Since then close consultation has continued, including bilateral contacts, the meeting of the North Atlantic Council on 13 October with Secretary Shultz, and the nuclear planning group meeting on 21–22 October. My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister is visiting the United States on 15 November for discussions with President Reagan.
47.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what consultations he has had with his European colleagues in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation about the proposals made at the Reykjavik summit; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence met NATO Defence Ministers of the nuclear planning group at its meeting at Gleneagles on 21–22 October.I also attended a meeting of the North Atlantic Council on 13 October, which discussed the Reykjavik outcome with Secretary Shultz.
Trident
46.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs under what prevailing international circumstances Her Majesty's Government would now consider Trident to be negotiable in arms control talks.
We have repeatedly stated that if the Soviet and United States strategic arsenals were to be very substantially reduced and if no significant changes had occurred in Soviet defensive capability we would want to review our position and consider how best we could contribute to arms control in the light of the reduced threat. That remains the position. As my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister said on 30 October, the independent nuclear deterrent is vital to our future defence.
Nuclear Missiles
48.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the Government's position on developments towards British participation in any intermediate range nuclear force arms negotiations.
The Geneva nuclear and space talks are bilateral negotiations between the United States and the Soviet Union. There is no question of British participation.
49.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether the Government still support the zero-zero option for intermediate range nuclear forces in Europe.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on Her Majesty's Government's position on the intermediate range nuclear forces negotiations with particular reference to the United States negotiating line at the Reykjavik summit.
The Alliance has consistently made clear its criteria for an acceptable INF agreement. These include the need for equal and global limits, appropriate constraints on shorter range INF and effective verification.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether Her Majesty's Government have been involved, or intend to become involved, in any discussions with the United States Administration concerning the reinterpretation or otherwise of the ABM treaty in relation to the SDI programme; and if he will make a statment.
We are not a party to the ABM treaty, although we have discussed ABM treaty issues with the United States Administration and will continue to do so as appropriate.
Falkland Islands
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether, following the Government's support for the United Nations General Assembly resolution calling for demilitarisation in the south Atlantic, he plans to reduce the British military presence in the Falkland Islands.
Our support for the United Nations resolution declaring a zone of peace and co-operation in the south Atlantic area reflects our desire to work for the reduction of tension in the region. As we made clear at the United Nations, we do not regard the new zone as affecting basic rights under the United Nations charter, which include that of self-defence.Force levels in the Falklands reflect the continuing need for a military presence sufficient to deter aggression and to defend the islands against attack.
Baha'i Community (Iran)
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent action he and his Community colleagues have taken on behalf of the Baha'i community in Iran.
As Presidency of the European Community we were instrumental in presenting a demarche to the Iranian Government on 26 August expressing our concern at the treatment of minority groups in Iran, and in particular the continued persecution of members of the Baha'i sect.At the United Nations General Assembly this autumn we shall again make clear that we look to the Government of Iran to respect the human rights standards set out in the international instruments to which they are party.
"Living Conditions In Oecd Countries"
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has yet updated table 7·5 bis on pages 76 and 77 of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Social Policy Studies No. 3: "Living Conditions in OECD Countries."
No. The OECD has no plans to update this particular table. But information on OECD unemployment is contained in the "Employment Outlook" and statistical background published by the OECD each September.
Hong Kong
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what will be the role of the Heung Yee Kuk in the New Territories, Hong Kong, after 1997; and if he will make a statement.
There is no specific provision in the Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong concerning the future of the Heung Yee Kuk after 1997. This is essentially a matter for the Government of the future Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will place in the Library a copy of the reports of the UMELCO of Hong Kong visits to North America, Europe and Japan to study nuclear power projects.
A copy will be placed in the Library as soon as possible.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the policy of the Hong Kong Government on the Daya Bay nuclear power plant.
The Hong Kong Government's policy towards the Daya Bay nuclear power plant has been set out in the speeches given by the Financial Secretary in the Legislative Council of Hong Kong on 16 July and 15 October 1986. Copies will be placed in the Library of the House.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will arrange for a referendum to be held on the proposed nuclear power plant at Daya Bay; and if he will make a statement.
No. We do not believe this would be appropriate. The proposed nuclear power station is to be located in the People's Republic of China.
Nepal
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on Her Majesty's Government's relations with Nepal.
Relations between Britain and Nepal have traditionally been close and friendly; they continue to be so.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if the Government of Nepal have made any representations concerning the dismissal of the soldiers of the Gurkha Regiment based in Hong Kong.
The Government of Nepal have made no such representations. We informed them at an early stage and have remained in close contact.
British Council
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what annual savings will result from the closure of the British Council's offices in Damascus; and whether the money saved will be retained for the use of the British Council.
The maximum annual gross saving that may eventually result from closing the British Council office in Damascus is of the order of £0·4 million. However, in 1986–87 there will be no savings and funds may be needed in 1987–88 to cover residual costs.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether the Government intend to cover the cost of increased security for the British Council; what estimate he has received from the British Council of such costs; how much money he proposes to make available for this purpose; and if he will make a statement.
In 1986–87 the council asked for £820,000 additional to its voted provision for the year to cover the cost of increased security. Parliamentary approval will be sought to provide a substantial proportion of this money. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has in principle accepted the council's case for enhanced security in the years 1987–88 to 1989–90 but the results of the public expenditure survey cannot be anticipated. Further details will be published in the public expenditure White Paper and in the Supply Estimates to be submitted for parliamentary approval.
India
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what further action he intends to take following the Government of India's refusal to grant visas to the two British drugs liaison officers; and if he will make a statement.
We have been promised a definitive response from the Indian Government in the very near future on whether the drug liaison officers can take up their posts.
Falkland Islands
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will publish a White Paper concerning the policy of Her Majesty's Government concerning fisheries in the Falklands including details of the negotiations conducted under the auspices of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.
I refer the hon. Member to the statement my right hon. and learned Friend made to the House on 29 October, at columns 323–33, in which he made clear our policy and drew attention to our support for a study by the Food and Agriculture Organisation on fish stocks in the south-west Atlantic.
Attorney-General
Tubero V Toomey
asked the Attorney-General what has been the result of the investigation into allegations made by the hon. Member for Hackney, South and Shoreditch (Mr. Sedgemore) regarding the case of Tubero v. Toomey and others.
I apologise for the length of this answer.On 19 December last the hon. Member for Hackney, South and Shoreditch (Mr. Sedgemore) made in this House serious allegations against the senior master of the Supreme Court Mr. J. R. Bickford Smith, TD concerning his handling of two interlocutory applications in the Queen's Bench division in two separate actions between the same parties. The hon. Member had given no previous notice of his allegations, and it is understood that the rule of the House forbidding adverse references to the higher judiciary except on substantive resolution does not apply to masters of the Supreme Court. Later the hon. Member wrote to the Lord Chancellor enclosing a report from the solicitors acting for the plaintiffs in the proceedings. The Lord Chancellor has made extensive inquiries about these allegations, involving the solicitors for the defendants and counsel representing both parties in the proceedings as well as the senior master himself and Sir Neil Lawson, who heard the appeal in chambers on the first summons.Both sets of proceedings arose from a claim by a Mr. Tubero and an associated company ("the plaintiffs") against the thousands of members of over 40 syndicates at Lloyd's, of whom only three were named as representing the rest. One of the defendants, but not one of those named, was a Mr. John Bickford-Smith who was a member of at least one of these syndicates. (I refer to the defendants collectively as "the defendants" and to Mr. Bickford-Smith as "Mr. Bickford-Smith the under-writer").The claim arose from a contract of insurance against theft by the defendants in connection with the plaintiffs' jewellery business in Los Angeles. The claim was based on an allegation that the plaintiffs had suffered loss from a theft of jewellery at their Los Angeles premises on 4 August 1981.Origially the claim was pursued against the dependents in the United States district court of South Florida. The defendants (then sued as "Lloyd's of London") disputed the claim on a number of grounds, including a denial that the alleged theft had taken place. On 17 May 1984 and 24 September 1984 the plaintiffs lost in interlocutory proceedings in their proceedings in the district court. The plaintiffs themsleves have never pursued these proceedings further since by an order dated 23 May 1985 the European American Bank were substituted as plaintiffs. Subsequently the plaintffs started separate proceedings in the state courts of Florida and New York. Those in the state court of Florida were dismissed as "duplicitous". It has not been ascertained exactly what became of the New York proceedings. On 1 August 1984 the plaintiffs commenced the first set of English proceedings in the Queen's Bench division of the High Court in London, by writ No. 1904 M 2943. These proceedings were founded on the same cause of action as those in the Florida district court. On 28 November 1984 the defendants issued a summons to dismiss these proceedings as an abuse of the process of the court. This was heard by the senior master on 13 December 1984. He allowed the summons and dismissed the action. The plaintiffs subsequently appealed but on 25 March 1985 the appeal was dismissed by Sir Neil
Lawson sitting as judge in chambers. In a letter to the Lord Chancellor enclosing a note of his ex tempore judgment, Sir Neil Lawson describes the case as the
"clearest possible case of abuse of the process".
The allegations concerning the first English proceedings
In his remarks to the House of 19 December 1985 the hon. Member alleged that in relation to the hearing in December 1984 the senior master had "grabbed" the case and insisted that he should deal with it. There is no truth whatever in this allegation. The case had originally been assigned to Master Turner, but in accordance with everyday practice in the Queen's Bench division, the defendants requested the masters' secretary to arrange for the senior master to take the case in view of his knowledge of United States law and procedure.
The hon. Member also suggested that the senior master had an interest in the case which he failed to disclose. There is no truth whatever in this. The senior master had no such interest. It appears, though accounts differ, that in one way or another counsel for the plaintiffs told the senior master that one of the defendants was a Mr. J. Bickford-Smith, but it does not appear that this was by way of objection but to avoid any conceivable embarrassment, since the senior master's initials are "J.R." and his name Bickford Smith though not hypenated is also identical. The senior master has a clear recollection to the effect that he explained that the underwriter was probably a cousin of his.
That the point was not seriously pursued before the senior master is clear not only from the recollections of counsel but also from the fact that it was not raised again in the proceedings.
The relationship allegation
In the course of his speech on 18 December the hon. Member for Hackney, South and Shoreditch said
"I have had a genealogist check the position and I can report that the grandfather of both of them—
that is both the senior master and Mr. Bickford-Smith the underwriter—
"was George Smith"
This would have made them first cousins and if true it would have been at best a serious reflection on the judgment of the senior master if (which did not happen) either party had objected to his taking the case and he had insisted on hearing it. But it is not true. Whilst it is not suggested that the hon. Member wilfully misled the House, the information of the genealogist disclosed by the hon. Member shows a very different situation.
It is true that the two Bickford-Smiths had a common ancester in one George Smith. He was not the grandfather of either and therefore they are not first cousins. He was the great great grandfather of Mr. Bickford-Smith the underwriter and the great grandfather of the senior master. The two men are thus second cousins once removed. That Mr. Bickford-Smith the underwriter, one of at least 15,000-odd defendants, had a minute interest in the proceedings is undeniable but can hardly be held to justify the intemperate criticism to which the senior master was subjected by the hon. Member. When these facts were brought to the hon. Member's notice in case he wished to make a personal statement to the House, he attributed his error to a "slip". Since the correct genealogy was apparently in his possession at the time, it may be thought to be rather worse than that.
The allegation that the senior master lied
The hon. Member also said:
"Master Bickford Smith lied to counsel. Yes, he lied. He said: 'You will not find another master in this corridor, nor a single judge in this building, who is not a Lloyd's underwriter.'"
The attribution of this remark to the senior master rests solely on the evidence of the solicitor appearing for the plaintiffs. It appears to be wholly incorrect as well as irrelevant and is in fact nonsensical. The senior master emphatically denies that he made this statement, and the solicitor's recollection is challenged by every counsel in the case, including the plaintiffs' own counsel. In fact it was clearly not made. The senior master is himself not an underwriter and would therefore be a living disproof of the assertion. The hon. Member was unable to provide any supporting evidence for this allegation except the solicitor in question. The alleged "lie" was never told. The allegation is clearly either fantasy or fabrication.
The allegation concerning the defendants' solicitors
The third allegation related to the defendants' Solicitors.
The hon. Member said:
"Further, what is happening in this case when of the solicitors, Elborne Mitchell, Elborne is a member of Lloyd's council, is a consultant in the case and is also a defendant in the case".—[Official Report, 18 December 1985; Vol. 89, c. 464–65.]
Again this is incorrect. Mr. Elbone was not a consultant in the case. At no stage did Mr. Elborne deal with the proceedings. Messrs. Elborne Mitchell and Co. were indeed the defendants' solicitors on the record, but the proceedings were dealt with by another partner.
The plaintiffs, who had lost their case before the senior master and had their action dismissed as an abuse of the process of the court, appealed to Sir Neil Lawson. Neither the notice of appeal nor anything said at the hearing of the appeal bears any trace of the matters complained of by the hon. Member, and though Sir Neil Lawson gave leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal the plaintiffs made no attempt to do so.
The second set of English proceedings
Instead of making use of the leave to appeal granted them on 4 April 1985 the plaintiffs proceeded to issue a second writ against the defendants (serial number 1985 M 1458). Their cause of action was different from that in the first English proceedings and inconsistent with it. This second writ seems to have contained a claim that on 19 March 1985 (about a week before the hearing by Sir Neil Lawson on 25 March) an agreement in writing by way of accord and satisfaction had been made between the two firms of solicitors settling the plaintiffs claim for $US 2 million. It is difficult to see how this could ever have matched with the plaintiffs' conduct a week later in prosecuting their appeal before Sir Neil Lawson in the first proceedings which as stated above was in respect of the original loss and not on the alleged agreement.
The second writ was also the subject of an application to dismiss or strike out the claim as an abuse of the process of the court. On 11 June 1985 the senior master ordered all previous proceedings to be struck out and for technical reasons a fresh statement of claim to be delivered. The plaintiffs were ordered to pay £300 in costs. In spite of the adverse order by the senior master the plaintiffs complied with it and did not appeal. Nor did they raise at the hearing any contention as to the suitability of the senior master to deal with the summons. It seems inconceivable that they should have acted in this manner had there been any substance in any of the serious allegations made against the senior master.
The revised statement of claim delivered as the result of the hearing on 11 June 1985 was met by a further application by the defendants to dismiss the second English proceedings as an abuse of the process of the court. This case came before the senior master on 9 and 17 October 1985. In the event the plaintiffs again lost. The senior master dismissed the action, which then permanently disappeared. Again no objection was made to the senior master taking the summons. Again the judgment was not appealed. The senior master concluded that the proceedings disclosed a "crude attempt" by the solicitors to the plaintiffs to obtain by trick wording money for their clients to which they knew they were not entitled at the expense of a United States bank to which the plaintiffs (or one of them) was or were indebted and of the underwriters, and the senior master expressed disapproval of the conduct of the plaintiffs' solicitors.
It is worth recording that the district judge in the United States district court had formed a similarly unflattering view of the plaintiffs and their advisers. Inter alia the district judge said (23 May 1985):
"It is painfully obvious that the affidavit submitted by Tubero is false. It should also be noted that the officer who notarised the affidavit is Robert H. Anderson II, Tubero's counsel…
It is clear on the face of the record in the main action that there has been a total lack of good faith prosecution (sic) in the main action…
The actions of Tubero's Counsel, Robert H. Anderson II are among the most unprofessional that this Court has witnessed. His behaviour can only be described as a blight on the reputation of the general legal community. It is the undersigned's opinion that Anderson's actions herein raise, serious questions regarding his fitness as a member of the legal profession".
Other matters
I turn to two other matters referred to by the hon. Member in his speech of 19 December. The first is the reference to freemasonary which appears to savour more of fantasy than fact. Contrary to what he has suggested Sir Neil Lawson is not a freemason, and, so far as can be ascertained, none of the counsel is a freemason.
The second other matter is a criticism of a letter as "pathetic" which it is alleged that the plaintiffs received from the Lord Chancellor's Office. This can only refer to one or both of two letters dated respectively 10 May 1985 and 4 September 1985 and written respectively 10 May 1985 and 4 September 1985 and written respectively to Mr. Tubero and to the American attorney Robert H. Anderson II (referred to above). In both of these the plaintiffs were properly advised that any objections to the hearing of a proceeding by a particular judge should be taken at the hearing in accordance with advice received.
Conclusion
The Lord Chancellor has looked into this case closely and can find no foundation whatever for the allegations which the hon. Gentleman has made against the senior master. Nor is there any evidence that Sir Neil Lawson, of the members of the Bar concerned in the case, or the defendants' solicitors, failed to deal with the matters before them on their merits, or that there was anything improper in their approach. The hon. Member cites a theory of some masonic conspiracy in support of his allegations. There is no basis for such a theory. So far as is known to the Lord Chancellor freemasonry is a perfectly lawful organisation and in any case, apart from the senior master, none of the persons involved in the proceedings appear to be freemasons. In particular, Sir Neil Lawson who disposed on appeal of the first proceedings is not. Though this has not influenced him in any way, the Lord Chancellor has asked me to say that he personally is not, nor has he never been, a freemason, but that he is a name at Lloyd's though not a member of any of the syndicates involved in the proceedings.
I regard it as most unfortunate that such serious and damaging remarks of this kind, which on investigation are apparently without any foundation whatever, should have been made in the House about a member of the judiciary. There is a well understood rule in the House that senior judges may not be attacked in debate save on a substantive motion. Whether or not a similar rule should apply to other judges and if so of which grades could only be decided by the House itself. But it may at least be thought that to make allegations of this kind under cover of parliamentary privilege in the middle of the night without prior notice to the Minister charged with replying, if not a misuse by the hon. Member of his rights, is at least contrary to the elementary rules of natural justice and fair play.
Lord Chancellor's Department (Running Costs)
asked the Attorney-General what change is proposed for the 1986–87 running costs limit for the Lord Chancellor's Department.
Subject to parliamentary approval of the necessary Supplementary Estimate the gross running costs limit for the Lord Chancellor's Department will be increased by £2,000,000 from £190,919,000 to £192,919,000. The increase is required for additional manpower to staff new courtrooms for the Crown court and to deal with increasing criminal and civil business. The extra costs will be offset by additional fee income and therefore there is no net change in public expenditure.
Land Registry (Running Costs)
asked the Attorney-General what change is proposed for the 1986–87 running costs limit for the Land Registry.
Subject to parliamentary approval of the necessary Supplementary Estimates, the running costs limit for the Land Registry will be increased by £1,835,000 from £82,840,000 to £84,675,000. Almost all the increase is required for temporary staff and overtime costs because the number of applications for registration in 1986–87 is now expected to reach 2,521,000, which exceeds the total originally anticipated, 2,292,000, by over 9 per cent. The increased running costs will be fully offset by the extra fee revenue that the greater workload will generate. No net additional public expenditure is therefore involved.
The Arts
Cleveland County Museums Service
asked the Minister for the Arts if he has made arrangements for an exhibition relating to the Cleveland County Museums Service's International Drawing Biennale to be displayed in the Upper Waiting Hall.
I understand that arrangements have been made with the authorities of the House for the exhibition to be held in the Upper Waiting Hall between 15 and 19 December 1986.
National Finance
Exchange Controls
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the new employment generated in the United Kingdom as a result of outward investment since the abolition of exchange controls.
I shall let my hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.
Taxation
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what progress has been made in the consolidation of the Income and Corporaton Taxes Act 1970 and the subsequent Finance Acts, and when he expects to publish a consolidated Bill.
On present plans, it is hoped to introduced a Bill consolidating the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1970 and subsequent legislation early in the 1987–88 Session of Parliament.
Betting
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what was the revenue from (a) off-course betting duty and (b) on-course betting duty for 1985–86; and what was the change from the previous year;(2) what information he has on the betting turnover
(a) off-course and (b) on-course for 1985–86; and what was the change from the previous year;
(3) what information he has on the betting turnover (a) off-course and (b) on-course for the six months, 5 April 1986 to 5 October 1986; and what was the change from the corresponding period for the previous year;
(4) what was the revenue from (a) off-course betting duty and (b) on-course betting duty for the six months 5 April 1986 to 5 October 1986; and what was the change from the corresponding period the previous year.
I shall let my hon. Friend have a reply as soon as possible.
Personal Income
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will detail the total of personal income going to the top 1 per cent., 2 per cent., 3 per cent., 4 per cent., and 5 per cent., respectively, before and after tax of each year since 1978–79.
[pursuant to his reply, 31 October 1986, c. 268]: Information is given in the tables. The quantile groups have been determined by reference to the distribution of income before tax (table 1) or after tax (table 2) of those single people and married couples for whom the Inland Revenue has records in each year. The figures are based on surveys of personal incomes.
| Table 1: Income before tax | |||||||
| £ billion (percentage shares) | |||||||
| Quantile group of tax units1 | 1978–79 | 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | 1984–85 |
| Top 1 per cent. | 5·3 | 6·5 | 7·8 | 8·6 | 9·7 | 10·3 | 10·9 |
| (5·1) | (5·3) | (5·5) | (5·7) | (5·9) | (5·8) | (5·7) | |
| Top 2 per cent. | 8·4 | 10·3 | 12·2 | 13·5 | 15·2 | 16·2 | 17·9 |
| (8·1) | (8·4) | (8·6) | (8·9) | (9·2) | (9·1) | (9·4) | |
| Top 3 per cent. | 11·1 | 13·5 | 16·0 | 17·8 | 19·8 | 21·3 | 23·4 |
| (10·6) | (11·0) | (11·3) | (11·8) | (11·9) | (12·0) | (12·2) | |
| Top 4 per cent. | 13·5 | 16·5 | 19·4 | 21·6 | 23·9 | 25·9 | 28·4 |
| (12·9) | (13·4) | (13·8) | (14·2) | (14·4) | (14·5) | (14·8) | |
| Top 5 per cent. | 15·7 | 19·2 | 22·6 | 25·1 | 27·7 | 30·1 | 33·0 |
| (15·0) | (15·6) | (16·0) | (16·5) | (16·7) | (16·9) | (17·2) | |
| 1ie counting married couples as one and combining their incomes. | |||||||
| Table 2: Income after tax | |||||||
| £ billion (percentage shares) | |||||||
| Quantile group of tax units1 | 1978–79 | 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | 1984–85 |
| Top 1 per cent. | 3·1 | 4·2 | 4·9 | 5·3 | 6·0 | 6·4 | 7·2 |
| (3·6) | (4·2) | (4·3) | (4·4) | (4·5) | (4·5) | (4·6) | |
| Top 2 per cent. | 5·3 | 7·0 | 8·1 | 8·8 | 9·9 | 10·6 | 11·9 |
| (6·3) | (6·9) | (7·1) | (7·3) | (7·4) | (7·5) | (7·7) | |
| Top 3 per cent. | 7·3 | 9·5 | 11·0 | 11·9 | 13·3 | 14·4 | 16·0 |
| (8·7) | (9·4) | (9·6) | (9·8) | (10·0) | (10·1) | (10·4) | |
| Top 4 per cent. | 9·1 | 11·8 | 13·7 | 14·8 | 16·5 | 17·9 | 19·8 |
| (10·8) | (11·6) | (11·9) | (12·2) | (12·4) | (12·5) | (12·8) | |
| Top 5 per cent. | 10·9 | 13·9 | 16·1 | 17·5 | 19·4 | 21·1 | 23·3 |
| (12·9) | (13·8) | (14·1) | (14·4) | (14·6) | (14·8) | (15·1) | |
| 1ie counting married couples as one and combining their incomes. | |||||||
Privatisation
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what selection procedure is used to obtain legal and financial advice from sources outside Her Majesty's Government in connection with privatisation proposals.
[pursuant to his reply, 3 November 1986]: The usual practice is that appointments by Departments of financial and legal advisers on privatisation are made following competitions.
Wales
Drug Addiction
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will publish in the Official Report the number of beds in each hospital in Wales allocated specifically for the treatment of drug addiction.
This information is not available centrally.
Drug Addicts
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will publish in the Official Report the number of registered drug addicts in each health authority in Wales for each of the past five years.
The numbers of new and former narcotic drug addicts notified to the Home Office are published annually. A copy of the Home Office's publication "Statistics on the Misuse of Drugs United Kingdom: Supplementary Tables 1984", which contains data for the most recent five years, is in the Library. Information relates to police force area and is not available by district health authority.
British Iron And Steel Federation Houses
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will publish in the Official Report the sums of money that his Department has allocated for the refurbishment of the British Iron and Steel Federation houses that are privately owned in Wales during each of the past five years.
Allocations have not been made for this purpose. A recent report by the Building Research Establishment found that the majority of BI SF houses are structurally sound.
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will publish in the Official Report the sums of money allocated by his Department to each local authority in Wales for the improvement of council-owned British Iron and Steel Federation houses during each of the past five years.
No specific allocations have been made for this purpose. Local authorities are free to decide their own expenditure priorities within the total allocations made available to them.
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if his Department has any plans to make grants available for the removal of asbestos in privately owned British Iron and Steel Federation houses.
Asbestos is generally present in BISF homes only as a small proportion of the composition of the roof material. These roofs are not considered to constitute a hazard and there are no plans for specific grants to be made available.
Aids
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if any persons in Wales have received transfused blood contaminated with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome virus.
Since 14 October 1985 the National Blood Transfusion Service has screened all blood donations for antibody to the AIDS virus.No cases of patients receiving transfusions of contaminated blood have been reported in Wales.
Regional Development Grant
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he will publish in the Official Report for each year since the introduction of the regional development grant, the percentage of the working population of Wales residing in assisted areas qualifying for that grant.
The regional development grant system introduced in 1972 was replaced by a new system introduced in November 1984, based on a combination of regional development grants and regional selective assistance. The proportion of the economically active population of Wales residing in assisted areas qualifying for that grant has been as follows during the period:
| Per cent. | |
| Before August 1982 | 100 |
| August 1982 to November 1984 | 93 |
| Post November 1984 | 38 |
Alcohol
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if his Department has undertaken any studies to assess the number of working days lost in Wales annually as a result of alcohol consumption.
No. However, a study into the health, social and economic costs of alcohol misuse in England and Wales has been funded from the DHSS/Welsh Office research and development budget. (cf McDonnell, R; Maynard, A (1985) "The Costs of Alcohol Misuse", British Journal of Addiction, 80, 27–35, a copy of which is in the Library).
Garden Festival
asked the Secretary of State for Wales if he intends to announce his decision on the site of the 1992 garden festival before 30 November.
I am giving very careful consideration to the four short-listed bids and hope to announce my decision soon—whether before or after 30 November I cannot yet say.
Mentally-Ill People (Consultative Paper)
asked the Secretary of State for Wales on what date he proposes to issue his consultative paper on the mentally ill in Wales.
The consultation paper will address a range of complex issues and will be published as soon as work on them has been completed.
Perinatal Mortality (Report)
asked the Secretary of State for Wales on what date he intends to publish the perinatal mortality report.
The report is in the course of final preparation and will be published as soon as is practicable.
Morriston Hospital, Swansea
asked the Secretary of State for Wales on what date the plastic and burns unit will be established at Morriston hospital, Swansea.
The transfer to Morriston hospital is presently expected to take place in 1992.
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Small Farmers
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many small farmers there are in England; and what percentage this is of the total of registered agricultural holdings.
Some 39,000 holdings are usually classified as small, about 26 per cent. of the total.
Meat Inspection
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what criteria he used in fixing the increase in meat inspection charges at 65 per cent.; and if he will make a statement.
The Government have made no such increase in charges. The European Commission has published proposals for minimum levels of charges for health inspections in slaughterhouses engaged in intra-Community trade. As has been explained to representatives of the meat trade, we consider the proposed minimum levels to be excessive and we will be seeking changes to the proposals.
Swine Fever
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a further statement on the outbreaks of swine fever during 1986, including details of the number of cases identified, the number of pigs slaughtered and the reasons why Her Majesty's Government did not impose a ban on imports during the period of the outbreak.
Ten outbreaks of classical swine fever were confirmed between 10 April and 25 June this year. 7,820 pigs were slaughtered. The action taken by the Government ensured that the outbreaks were quickly stamped out.There were two reasons why the European Community provisions for restricting imports could not be invoked on this occasion. The disease situation in the countries from which we import pigmeat products was not worsening. Also, though there was strong circumstantial evidence to link the outbreaks with feeding of waste scraps from imported pigmeat products, there is no proof that these came from any particular country. A ban on imports would therefore have been legally unsound.
Herring (Irish Sea)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food why he has opposed, at the European Economic Community Council of Ministers, the Commission's proposal that herring spawning grounds in the north Irish Sea should remain open until 21 September each year; and if he will make a statement on this decision of the Council of Ministers to reject the Commission's proposal and instead to close the grounds from I September.
Fishing for herring is prohibited in two areas of the North Irish sea to protect the spawning grounds. When the closures for 1986 were proposed, the United Kingdom requested a starting date of 1 September in order to safeguard the traditional drift net fishery on the Mourne spawning grounds. Subsequently, at the request of the Northern Irish fishing industry, we asked the Commission to put forward a proposal to amend the starting date for the closure of the Douglas bank spawning grounds to allow this area to remain open until 21 September. The Commission was unwilling to put such a proposal forward for 1986, but I am hopeful that it will do so in its proposals for the quota arrangements for 1987.
Intervention Stocks
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is the value of grain held currently in intervention stocks in the United Kingdom; how many companies are holding such stock; and what monitoring there is to ensure that there is no misappropriation of the stock.
Based on the buying-in price then current, the value of United Kingdom stocks of intervention grain on 17 October 1986, the latest date for which figures are available, was £520 million, of which grain to the value of £479 million was held in commercial stores by 90 companies, the balance in Government-owned stores. The quality and quantity of the stock is monitored by regular visits by the board's agents, the Home Grown Cereals Authority, and by an annual volumetric stocktaking.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) on how many occasions companies involved in holding intervention stocks of agricultural produce have been found to be in financial difficulties; how many have gone into liquidation or are threatened with it; and if he will name the companies involved and state in each case the action taken by officials to safeguard public money and the amount of public money that has been or is likely to be lost as a result of the liquidations that have taken or are likely to take place;(2) if he will make a statement on the extent of public involvement with the company Trent Grain which holds intervention stocks of agricultural produce, stating
(a) whether any public money is likely to be lost, (b) whether there is evidence of any stock loss, (c) when officials first appreciated the nature of the firm's problems, (d) what action was subsequently taken to limit the extent of possible public financial loss and (e) whether officials studied the company reports of the last three years.
I shall reply to the right hon. Member as soon as possible.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will publish in the Official Report details of the financial monitoring arrangements of companies holding intervention stocks of agricultural produce; how frequent and of what nature are the contacts; what financial information is requested; and at what level responsibility is taken for ensuring that all such companies being paid public money are financially stable.
The Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce makes use of the services of a private business reporting agency in monitoring the financial status of companies offering storage facilities. The board's professional accountants provide advice on the reports received which vary both in content and frequency according to circumstances.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many firms hold intervention stocks of agricultural produce; where they are located; what is the total annual amount paid to such companies; and what is the average amount.
On 30 September 1986, the latest date for which details are available, 249 companies held United Kingdom intervention stocks at the locations listed. The Intervention Board's 1986–87 Supply Estimate contains provision for about £110 million for payments to commercial storekeepers for the handling and storage of intervention produce, an average of £442,000 per company.
| Aberdeen | Blackburn |
| Abingdon | Bloxwich |
| Ahoghill | Bristol |
| Airdrie | Boroughbridge |
| Alford | Bourne |
| Ancaster | Boston |
| Annalong | Braintree |
| Antrim | Bridge of Allan |
| Arbroath | Bridgwater |
| Augher | Bressingham |
| Avonmouth | Bury St. Edmunds |
| Aylesford | Buxton |
| Ballymena | Caine |
| Banbridge | Camborne |
| Banbury | Cannock |
| Bardney | Cardiff |
| Basildon | Chipping Warden |
| Belfast | Chard |
| Belford | Chester |
| Bellshill | Christchurch |
| Bicester | Cleveland |
| Billingham | Clopston |
| Bishop's Stortford | Cockermouth |
| Coleraine | Leicester |
| Colnbrook | Leith |
| Colsterworth | Leven |
| Corby | Lincoln |
| Coventry | Linton |
| Craigavon | Lisburn |
| Crymych | Little Saxham |
| Cullhampton | Liverpool |
| Cumbernauld | Llandysul |
| Dagenham | Llanelli |
| Dalcross | Locharbriggs |
| Darlington | London |
| Downham Market | Londonderry |
| Driffield | Long Eaton |
| Droitwich | Lostwithiel |
| Drumlithie | Lowestoft |
| Dudley | Lurgan |
| Dungannon | Luton |
| Duns | Lutterworth |
| Dysart | Lympne |
| Earls Colne | Magherafelt |
| Eastleigh | Maidstone |
| Edinburgh | Maldon |
| Ely | Manby |
| Elsworth | Manchester |
| Evanton | March |
| Exeter | Market Drayton |
| Eye | Market Harborough |
| Fakenham | Market Rasen |
| Fearne | Melmerby |
| Felixstowe | Membury |
| Fleetwood | Milford Haven |
| Finmere | Milton Keynes |
| Ford | Minworth |
| Foulsham | Misson |
| Fraserburgh | Mistley |
| Frome | Monmouth |
| Fulbourn | Newport |
| Gainsborough | Newry |
| Gateshead | Newton Abbey |
| Gillingham | Newton Abbot |
| Glasgow | Newbury |
| Glenrothes | Newcastle |
| Gloucester | Newmachar |
| Grantham | Newmarket |
| Granton | Normanton |
| Grateley | Northallerton |
| Grimsby | North Shields |
| Hadleigh | Norwich |
| Hadstock | Nuneaton |
| Halesworth | Oldbury |
| Halstead | Omagh |
| Hardingstone | Ormiston |
| Haresfield | Oswestry |
| Hartlebury | Owmby |
| Hayes | Paddock Wood |
| Heighington | Pebmarsh |
| Hemswell | Penrith |
| Hereford | Penicuik |
| Heywood | Peterborough |
| Hillsborough | Peterhead |
| Hotton-le-Clay | Pickerham |
| Honeyborne | Pinhoe |
| Horncastle | Pockingtom |
| Hoveringham | Plymouth |
| Hull | Pontefract |
| Huntingdon | Portadown |
| Immingham | Prees Heath |
| Ingham | Preston |
| Inverness | Quarrington |
| Ipswich | Rackheath |
| Keith | Raydon |
| Kings Lynn | Reading |
| Kingswinford | Redcar |
| Kirkcaldy | Retford |
| Kirknewton | Rhyl |
| Kirton Lindsey | Ringwood |
| Lampeter | Rochdale |
| Leeds | Roydon |
| Leek | Royston |
| St. Clears | Torrington |
| St. Helens | Towcester |
| St. Ives | Tranent |
| Salisbury | Turiff |
| Scunthorpe | Truro |
| Sevenoaks | Tuxford |
| Sheffield | Ulcaby |
| Sherborne | Uttoxeter |
| Shrewsbury | Walsall |
| Skegness | Walsingham |
| Sleaford | Warrington |
| Sherpness | Warwick |
| Snetterton | Watford |
| Soham | Wednesbury |
| Southampton | Wellingborough |
| South Wigston | Wellington |
| Staughton | Wells |
| Stoke Ferry | Westbury |
| Stourport | West Bromwich |
| Stourmarket | West Hallam |
| Strabane | West Wratting |
| Stracathro | Whitchurch |
| Stockton on Tees | Whittlesford |
| Stonehouse | Whittlesey |
| Stretham | Whitland |
| Stroud | Wigan |
| Sudbury | Wigston |
| Swaffham | Wimblington |
| Swansea | Wingham |
| Swinderby | Wisbech |
| Swindon | Witham |
| Tadcaster | Witney |
| Tamworth | Wolverhampton |
| Tangmere | Woodbridge |
| Taunton | Wroughton |
| Telford | Wymeswold |
| Thetford | Yeovil |
| Tewkesbury | York |
Meat (Chemical Treatment)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will review his decision not to ban the process of tenderising beef by injection into the jugular vein while the animal is still alive, under constraint in a crush while its head is pulled up.
The proposal to permit formed part of our response to the Farm Animal Welfare Council's report on the slaughter of red meat animals. Our response was issued to interested organisations for comment and we are reviewing our proposals in the light of representations received.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) if he will bring in regulations to enable the consumer to specifically identify meat that has been tenderised by the process of injection of enzymes before the animal was slaughtered;(2) if he envisages any action to enable consumers to identify meat which has been tenderised by the injection of enzymes.
The Food Labelling Regulations 1984 already require the name used for any meat which has been treated with proteolytic enzymes or which is derived from an animal that has been so treated shall include or be accompanied by the word "tenderised".
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if any research is currently sponsored by his Department to complete the work which had been undertaken until spring 1986 at the Institute of Animal Research at Newbury into the development of more sensitive tests capable of picking up low residual levels of hormones and antibiotics in carcasses after slaughter.
Research is currently in progress at the Ministry's central veterinary laboratory, Weybridge, on the development and improvement of analytical methods capable of detecting low residual levels of hormones and antibiotics in tissues and body fluids of slaughtered animals.
Environmentally Sensitive Areas
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) what forestry development is currently proceeding or is in process of preparation within environmentally sensitive areas; and if he will make a statement;(2) what drainage projects are planned or proceeding on wetland of ecological or environmental attraction within environmentally sensitive areas;(3) what current developments are taking place within environmentally sensitive areas which he assesses are likely to be injurious to the present character of such areas; and which of these projects are supported by grants from public funds.
I shall reply to the hon. Member as soon as possible.
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make it his policy to refuse to make grants towards land drainage or commercial forestry operations within environmentally sensitive areas where such development could be injurious to the quality of the area concerned; and if he will make a statement.
Under existing arrangements, grants for new drainage or forestry work require prior written consent. That consent will be given in environmentally sensitive areas only to developments which are compatible with the environmental features of the area concerned.
Wild Mink
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) at what rate it is estimated that wild mink are increasing in the United Kingdom;(2) what representations he has received about wild mink in British waterways;(3) what action he intends to take to reduce the numbers of wild mink;(4) what reports of damage caused by wild mink he has received over the past three years.
Mink are now well established in the wild in England and Wales, but my Department has no reliable scientific data on the numbers of mink involved, and comprehensive information about the damage caused is not readily available.Although not a significant agricultural pest, mink are predators of wildfowl, poultry, fisheries and game and in some cases they may cause damage to certain individual enterprises. The Ministry provides specialist advice to anyone experiencing damage and traps are at present loaned free of charge. Responsibility for control of pests none the less rests with the occupier of land.I am not aware of any recent representations about wild mink in British waterways.
Management Information Systems
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food whether he is now able to make available the 1986 returns of his top management information systems.
I am pleased to say that a copy of the 1986 MINIM returns, which cover the objectives and resources used by the Ministry's programmes, has been placed today in the Library of the House.
Fishing Fleet (Decommissioning Scheme)
asked the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how much cod, haddock, saithe and whiting was caught and landed by vessels which are no longer active in the fleet by virtue of their having been decommissioned since the decommissioning scheme was introduced.
[pursuant to his reply, 28 October 1986, c. 85.]: Over 200 vessels have been decommissioned since the scheme was introduced. Details of the total catches by those vessels of the species listed are not readily available and cannot be obtained from the records held by MAFF and DAFS except at disproportionate cost.
Defence
Warship Procurement
12.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement outlining his plans for the future of warship procurement over the next five years.
We intend to maintain a substantial warship procurement programme over the next five years, as we have done over the last seven.
Type 23 Frigates
13.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence when he expects to attain the required ordering pattern of three type 23 frigates per year in order to preserve a proper age structure for a 50 surface ship fleet.
16.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if, pursuant to his statement in July on the placement of orders for type 23 frigates 02, 03 and 04, he will now make a statement on the position in the ordering programme of frigates 05, 06 and 07.
Following the announcement I made earlier this year, there are now four of the new class of type 23 frigates on order. No decisions have yet been taken on the size or timing of further orders of follow-on type 23s, but these will, as always, be dependent upon the availability of resources.
Royal Naval Dockyards
14.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a further statement on the privatisation of royal naval dockyards.
The timetable for the introduction of commercial management is being achieved. Six tenders have been submitted by companies bidding for the contract to manage the dockyards, and negotiations on the term contract are now in progress. It is hoped to announce a successful contractor for each dockyard at the end of the year, and for that contractor to assume responsibility for the management of the dockyard on vesting day, 6 April 1987.
Fylingdales Early Warning System
15.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what progress has been made towards modernisation of the Fylingdales early warning system.
Since the statement I made on 22 May in reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Scarborough (Sir M. Shaw), a notice of proposed development has been submitted to the North Yorkshire Moors national parks committee and a memorandum of understanding concluded with the Government of the United States.
Nato Air Bases
17.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation has made of the implications of removing United States air bases from Britain.
As stated in the declaration of Alliance Heads of State and Government following the North Atlantic Council meeting in Bonn in 1982:
"The presence of North American armed forces in Europe and the United States strategic nuclear commitment to Europe remain integral to Allied security."
Reykjavik Summit
18.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the implications for United Kingdom defence policy of the proposals put forward at the Reykjavik summit.
21.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the defence implications of the Reykjavik mini-summit.
25.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what are the implications for United Kingdom defence policy of the Reykjavik summit discussions.
I refer my hon. Friend and the hon. Members to the statement I made in the House on 23 October. The implications for our defence policy of the arms control process, including the Reykjavik talks, are being fully and continuously considered.
Holy Loch
19.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what communications he has had with the United States Government relating to the future of Holy Loch.
I refer the hon. Member to my reply to him on 23 October.
33.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what discussions have taken place regarding the future of the United States submarine base on the Holy Loch.
41.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement concerning the future of the United States base in Holy Loch.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to the hon. Member for Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley (Mr. Foulkes) earlier today.
Nato (Nuclear Planning Group)
20.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation nuclear planng group's recent meeting at Gleneagles.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Minister of State for the Armed Forces, to the right hon. Member for Llanelli (Mr. Davies) on 23 October, at column 1293.
27.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement concerning the meeting of the nuclear planning group at Gleneagles.
30.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation nuclear planning group meeting at Gleneagles on 20–21 October.
I refer the hon. Members to the answer which I gave earlier today to the hon. Member for Orkney and Shetland (Mr. Wallace).
Strategic Defence Initiative
22.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the progress of United Kingdom involvement in research and development related to the United States strategic defence initiative.
So far SDI research awards to the United Kingdom amount to $17 million. Other prospects involving both Government research establishments and United Kingdom companies and research organisations are at advanced stages of negotiation, across a broad spectrum of research areas.
34.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he has had discussions with the United States Secretary of Defence concerning the progress of the strategic defence initiative programme since 13 October.
My right hon. Friend had a very useful discussion with Mr. Weinberger on a range of issues, including the SDI research programme, at the nuclear planning group meeting in Gleneagles on 21–22 October. The details are confidential.
42.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he has any plans to discuss the strategic defence initiative with his United States counterparts; and if he will make a statement.
I have no immediate plans to do so. However, the strategic defence initiative is a subject covered in the frequent contacts between Ministers and officials of the British and United States Governments. Most recently it was discussed during the ministerial meeting of NATO's nuclear planning group at Gleneagles on 21–22 October. A copy of the communique of that meeting has been placed in the Library.
Raf (Flying Hours Restriction)
23.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if the restriction on flying hours in the Royal Air Force imposed when oil prices were high has been modified in the light of lower fuel costs.
There has been no restriction on flying hours in the Royal Air Force since July 1985.
Intermediate Range Nuclear Missiles
24.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what talks he has held recently with the United States Government concerning cuts in intermediate range nuclear missiles.
My right hon. Friend had discussions on intermediate range forces with the US Defence Secretary and other NATO Defence Ministers at the recent meeting of the NATO nuclear planning group. A copy of the communiqué issued at the end of that meeting is in the Library.
Service Residences (Malvern)
26.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many of the residences up for sale at Malvern are still empty and without offers to purchase; and if he will make a statement.
All 22 of the Army's surplus married quarters at Wood Farm camp are empty. They have been passed to the Property Services Agency for disposal, and so far 17 have been advertised and offered to service men for sale under the armed forces discounted sales scheme, offers for 16 properties are being processed, and one property for which there is no bid will be sold on the open market by the Property Services Agency. The remaining five surplus quarters will be offered for sale shortly under the discounted sales scheme, and any not sold under the scheme will be sold on the open market.
Raf (Female Pilots)
28.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he plans to change present Royal Air Force policy so as to allow female members of the Royal Air Force to fly aeroplanes.
Women have been eligible for some time to fly as air loadmasters in the RAF. Girls were also given the opportunity to fly following the 1985 reorganisation of the university air squadrons. We have no plans, however, to change our present policy and employ female members of the RAF as pilots or navigators.
Gruinard Island
29.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will report on progress towards the decontamination of Gruinard Island; and if he will make a statement.
Treatment of the island was completed in August. Soil samples have been taken and are now being studied. The results of these studies will be considered by the Ministry of Defence and its independent advisory group before any decision is taken about the future of the island.
Defence Review
31.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has for a defence review.
None.
Reykjavik Summit
32.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether he is satisfied that the defence of the United Kingdom would be fully safeguarded if the reductions in nuclear weapons proposed at the Reykjavik summit were all implemented.
The Government fully endorse the bold attempt of the President of the United States to seek far-reaching arms control agreements with the Soviet Union. We have also made it clear that there is obviously a direct relation between major reductions in strategic nuclear forces and conventional forces and it is essential that the two are seen together. Such reductions must also go hand in hand with an improvement of East-West relations generally.
Royal Ordnance Factories
35.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement concerning the Royal Ordnance factories.
I have nothing to add to the answer given to the hon. Member for Blackburn (Mr. Straw) on 24 October 1986, at column 967.
Combined Cadet Force
36.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he has any plan to review his Department's funding of the Combined Cadet Force in schools; and if he will make a statement.
We are presently reviewing the organisation and funding of the Combined Cadet Force to see whether the current arrangements are the most efficient and effective to enable the aims and objectives of the force to be fully realised.
Trident
37.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment his Department has made of the capability of Soviet defences to counter the Trident missile when it is deployed.
No developments in Soviet anti-ballistic missile defences are currently foreseen which are likely to negate the deterrent effect of the Trident force within the lifetime of the system.
39.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what representations he has received about the relative economics of Trident as the future nuclear deterrent option.
None. Trident is the most cost-effective way of providing Britain with the necessary minimum deterrent after Polaris.
Nuclear Deterrent
38.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the purpose of the nuclear deterrent.
I refer my hon. Friend to the description of NATO strategy on pages 12–14 of volume I of the "Statement on the Defence Estimates 1985".
Northern Ireland
40.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement about the role and operations of Her Majesty's Forces, including the Ulster Defence Regiment, in support of the civil power in Northern Ireland.
The role of Her Majesty's forces in Northern Ireland is to provide support to the Royal Ulster Constabulary in the fight against terrorism. Nine Regular battalions, one Royal Marine Commando and nine battalions of the Ulster Defence Regiment, together with specialist support from other units, such as the Royal Engineers, are currently deployed in the Province. Elements of the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force also make an important contribution.
Abbott Self-Propelled Gun
43.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence when the 105 mm Abbott Self-Propelled gun will be replaced in the British Army of the Rhine.
We expect to commence phasing out the 105 mm Abbott Self-Propelled gun around the end of this decade.
Missile Launchers
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will identify and quantify the number of missile launchers with a range of up to 200 km currently in Europe credited to North Atlantic Treaty Organisation forces that are (a) non-reloadable and (b) reloadable.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will identify and quantify the number of missile launchers with a range of up to 200 km currently credited to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation armed forces in the United States of America and Europe that are (a) non-reloadable and (b) reloadable.
The "Statement on the Defence Estimates 1986" shows that there are 90 Lance missile launchers with a range of up to 200 km deployed with NATO forces in Europe. We also understand there are about 12 Lance missile launchers in the United States of America which could reinforce those in Europe. Lance missile launchers are reloadable.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will identify and quantify the number of missile launchers with a range of up to 200 kilometres currently in Europe credited to Warsaw Pact forces that are (a) non-reloadable and (b) reloadable.
Launchers for nuclear missiles with a range of up to 200 km currently deployed with Warsaw Pact forces in Europe are Frog and SS21. The number deployed is shown in the "Statement on the Defence Estimates 1986" (annex A, figure 15 under short range systems) as 700. All the launchers are reloadable.
Nuclear Weapons
asked the Secretary of State for Defence whether approval has been given for the construction of underground nuclear weapons storage vaults at Royal Air Force Lakenheath, Royal Air Force Upper Heyford and Royal Air Force Bentwaters.
My Department is involved in continuing discussions with the US Government on possible storage facilities. No decisions have been taken.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list by variant the number of (a) short range nuclear weapons with a range of up to 200 km and (b) medium range nuclear missiles with a range of between 200 km and 1000 km that have been removed from Europe as a result of the 27 October 1983 Montebello decision of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation nuclear planning group.
[pursuant to his reply, 30 October 1986, c. 262.]: The withdrawals of the following categories of NATO nuclear weapons in Europe since the Montebello decision have been announced to date:
Hong Kong (Ministerial Visit)
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the recent visit to Hong Kong by the Minister of State, the right hon. Member for Tonbridge and Mailing (Mr. Stanley).
I visited Hong Kong from 27 to 29 August 1986. The main purpose of my visit was to see and talk to personnel from all three services in the Hong Kong garrison, and to have discussions with the Commander British Forces and members of the Hong Kong Government.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if the Minister of State, the right hon. Member for Tonbridge and Mailing (Mr. Stanley), met members of the Gurkha Regiment on his recent visit to Hong Kong.
Yes. I had the pleasure of visiting the 6th Queen Elizabeth's Own Gurkha Rifles, the 1st and 2nd Battalions 7th Duke of Edinburgh's Own Gurkha Rifles, and the 10th Princess Mary's Own Gurkha Rifles, and I also met members of the Queen's Gurkha Signals and the Queen's Gurkha Engineers.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence if the Minister of State, the right hon. Member for Tonbridge and Malting (Mr. Stanley), met representatives of the anti-nuclear lobby concerning the proposed construction of the Daya Bay nuclear power plant on his recent visit to Hong Kong.
No.
Gurkha Regiment
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many members of the Gurkha Regiment are based in Hong Kong at the latest date.
On 31 August there were about 5,000 Gurkhas stationed in Hong Kong, including trainees.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many Gurkha soldiers served in Hong Kong since 1956 to 1986; and how many have been dismissed the service.
Some 29,000 Gurkha soldiers have served in Hong Kong since 1956. Of these, a total of 156 men since 1980 have been dismissed or discharged on disciplinary grounds while serving in Hong Kong. This includes the 110 members of 1st/7th Gurkha Rifles discharged in August this year. Records kept prior to 1980 do not specify location at time of discharge.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence how many Gurkha soldiers have been dismissed from Her Majesty's forces since 1956.
Since 1956, 369 Gurkha soldiers have been dismissed or discharged on disciplinary grounds from Her Majesty's forces.
Employment Statistics
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has of the number of people directly and indirectly employed in (a) maintaining the independent nuclear deterrent, (b) the servicing of United States bases in the United Kingdom and (c) the Trident programme.
It is estimated that (a) 11,000 MOD civilians are directly employed in maintaining the independent nuclear deterrent, (b) United States bases and service men and their British employees provide about 30,000 direct and indirect jobs including those generated by the purchase of goods and services in the United Kingdom, (c) the Trident programme will create an average of 8,000 direct and 7,000 indirect job opportunities throughout its procurement period, rising to 15,000 and 12,000 in the peak years of the programme. The number of people indirectly employed in maintaining the independent nuclear deterrent is not known.
Nimrod
asked the Secretary of State for Defence (1) whether the Nimrod AEW mission system avionics are now operating at an acceptable standard;(2) what is his assessment of the present efficiency of the GEC avionics radar in the AEW Nimrod programme;(3) if he is considering accepting the Nimrod AEW at a lower level of performance specification than originally required.
I shall answer shortly.
asked the Secretary of State for Defence what is the latest available information of the current cost of the AEW Nimrod programme.
To date, some £930 million (VAT included) at current prices has been spent or committed on the Nimrod AEW project.