Written Answers To Questions
Wednesday 1 July 1992
Attorney-General
Maxwell Arrests
To ask the Attorney-General what principles the director of the Serious Fraud Office applies on the execution of a warrant for arrest; and whether he will make a statement on the arrest of Mr. Ian Maxwell and Mr. Kevin Maxwell.
It is the policy of the Serious Fraud Office to procure the arrest of persons suspected of serious fraud with the assistance of the police. The process of arrest is an operational matter for the police who will decide questions of timing, whereabouts and related matters as part of their operational duties. Where police are conducting investigations in conjunction with the Serious Fraud Office, they may be advised, but not directed, on such matters by the SFO. Such advice will have regard to the seriousness of the alleged offences, the need to secure evidence at the time of the arrest and any circumstances material to the risk that a suspect may seek to abscond, including the likelihood that such suspect may have the means and ability to do so and to support himself outside the jurisdiction. Each case will be considered impartially on its merits.Ian Maxwell, Kevin Maxwell and Larry Trachtenburg were arrested without warrant on suspicion of having committed the offences for which they have subsequently been charged. Similar principles govern both the execution of warrants of arrest issued by the courts and arrest without warrant.
De Lorean Cars
To ask the Attorney-General what consideration he has given to the remarks of Lord Justice Murray at Belfast Crown Court last week in relation to Fred Bushell, the late Colin Chapman and John de Lorean; what obstacles stand in the way of extraditing Mr. De Lorean from the United States of America to face charges in the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement.
My attention has been drawn to the remarks of Lord Justice Murray in the course of sentencing Federick Bushell at the conclusion of his trial. These followed a joint investigation by the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the Serious Fraud Office. Frederick Bushell resided and was arrested in the United Kingdom.Although the Royal Ulster Constabulary holds a warrant for the arrest of Mr. De Lorean for conspiracy to defraud, I am advised that the laws of the United States provide a limitation period after which extradition is not normally possible. Although the period varies depending on the offence alleged, the period in this case expired before the Serious Fraud Office was created. It was the Serious Fraud Office investigation which produced the evidence justifying the obtaining of the warrant against Mr. De Lorean.
Market Testing
To ask the Attorney-General if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
Proposals for market testing relating to the Departments for which I am responsible are being considered and an announcement will be made later in the year. Any relevant information will be made available, subject to the need to protect commercial confidentiality.
To ask the Attorney-General what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
In 1991 the Crown prosecution service contracted out its headquarters reprographic operation at a saving of around £90,000 per year. No other estimates have been made.
To ask the Attorney-General what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
The cost is £15,500.
Home Department
Asylum
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many additional places he has provided for the purposes of detaining applicants for asylum; and where these places are located.
New accommodation, providing about 300 additional places for detention under Immigration Act powers, will be delivered in phases from September 1992 to spring 1995, and will be located at Harmondsworth, Gatwick airport, Kidlington in Oxford and Stansted airport.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, further to his answer on 24 June, Official Report, columns 193–94, if he will list the organisations with which he has held meetings in connection with proposed legislation on asylum applications.
I have discussed legislation on asylum at meetings with representatives of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Amnesty International and Westminster city council. My right hon. and learned Friend and I are ready to hear the views of interested organisations.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
A provisional programme of areas of work to be market tested in my Department in 1992–93 has been drawn up and promulgated to Home Office staff. As promised in the White Paper "Competing for Quality", departmental targets for market testing in 1992–93 will be announced later this year.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department wht estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
The purpose of the market-testing programme is to test by competition the value for money represented by the present arrangements for undertaking activities and thereby to identify and introduce more effective arrangements. No estimate of likely savings has yet been made.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
The cost of the market-testing initiative in my Department from November 1991 to June 1992 is £150,000.
Racism
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the United Kingdom's position on reducing racism and xenophobia in Europe.
The Government abhor all manifestations of racism and support all the practical steps taken by member states to counter this. We were very pleased to support the European Council declaration on racism and xenophobia agreed at Maastricht in December 1991.
Metropolitan Police (Accidents)
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will provide details of how many accidents involving Metropolitan police vehicles and third parties have been reported for each year since 1985; and on how many occasions in each year the Metropolitan police were held to be liable for the accidents.
The information is not held in the form requested.
Shamrock Farms
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what representations he has received from the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection on Shamrock Farms; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. and learned Friend the Home Secretary has received no representations from the BUAV on Shamrock Farms to date.
Expatriate Voters
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the basis on which expatriate voters were allocated to each constituency.
Overseas electors are registered in the constituency in which they were last registered as electors before leaving the United Kingdom. If they left the country before they were old enough to vote, they are registered in the constituency in which a parent or guardian was registered at the time they left the country.
Animals (Scientific Procedures)
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if he will make it a policy to extend minimal standards of care and accommodation as set out in the code of practice for the housing and care of animals used in scientific procedures to all suppliers of animals;(2) what minimum standards primate traders must meet to be licensed by his office; what are the dimensions of the smallest cage British primate suppliers may legally use; and if he will make a statement.
It is already the practice of the Home Office animals (scientific procedures) inspectorate to seek compliance by designated suppliers with the standards of care and accommodation set out in the Laboratory Animal Breeders Association's guidelines on the care and housing of animals bred for scientific purposes. There is therefore a recognised standard against which such establishments can be assessed.The recommended minimum size of cage is determined by the weight of the primate to be housed. The smallest cage size recommended by the LABA guidelines is for animals up to 700g in weight. The minimum recommended height for such animals is 100 cm, and the minimum recommended floor area is 1,200 sq cm per animal when the animals are housed in groups, or 2,500 sq cm when they are housed singly.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the names of all British primate suppliers and for each the number of primates which (a) were dead upon their arrival to Britain, (b) died before reaching British research laboratories and (c) were slaughtered before research was undertaken.
The Home Office does not hold information on the number of primates imported into Great Britain which are dead on arrival or which have died before reaching British research laboratories.Figures on the number of primates humanely killed after receipt and before use are not collated centrally. The humane killing of primates in British research laboratories in such circumstances is known to be uncommon, but might take place, for example, to terminate suffering from otherwise untreatable disease.It is not our practice to give details of individual establishments designated under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.
Naturalisation
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the outstanding backlog of naturalisation applications as at 1 January 1990, 1991, and 1992 and for the most recent available date; and what is the current rate at which applications are being cleared.
The numbers of outstanding applications for naturalisation on the dates referred to were as follows:
1 Applications awaiting allocation
| Allocated applications
| |
| 1 January 1990 | 2,914 | 64,930 |
| 1 January 1991 | 1,645 | 62,949 |
| 1 January 1992 | 6,266 | 38,382 |
| 1 June 1992 | 582 | 43,569 |
1 It is not possible at this stage to distinguish beween applications for naturalisation and those for registration. | ||
These cases are currently being cleared at the rate of around 2,600 per month.
Operation Container
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) when he now expects Operation Container to end in Greater Manchester;(2) how much Operation Container has so far cost; and what is his estimate of its final cost.
Since April 1990, the total payment made to the Greater Manchester police for holding prisoners in police cells has been £40,121,851.19 This figure does not include payments for Manchester prisoners held by other police forces, information on which was not collected separately. As has been explained to the hon. Member, while the ending of the police cells problem is a matter of the highest priority for the prison service, it is not possible to say exactly when Operation Container will no longer be required or the final cost.
Transport
National Exhibition Centre
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what is the likely completion date of the proposed dedicated access road and signalling system from the M42 to the national exhibition centre; and if he will make a statement.
The contract for the construction of the improved access road from the southway exit of the national exhibition centre to the M42 slip road is due to be let very shortly. This should enable it to be open in time for the motor show in late October. Improvements to the roundabout at the intersection of the A45 and the M42, including the provision of further traffic signals and the widening of the approaches to the roundabout, are currently being designed in detail. These should be completed summer 1993. Together with the other improvements which we have in hand at and around this intersection, access to and from the NEC and the other important facilities in the area will be easier.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
Following the publication of the White Paper "Competing for Quality" in which a new market testing initiative was announced, the efficiency unit will announce the programme for all departments later this year. All relevant information will be made public.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what has been the total cost so far of the market testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
The identified cost since November 1991, mainly consultants' fees, amounts to some £10,000. Other expenditure involving the salaries of civil servants is not kept in a suitable form and ascertaining what it might be could be achieved only at disproportionate cost.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market testing programme.
Since 1986–87 the total estimated savings made to date as a result of the market testing programme amount to approximately £7.3 million.
National Heritage
Disabled Employees
To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage how many and what percentage of officers in grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, respectively, and overall in his Department are registered disabled people.
The Department of National Heritage is still in the process of being set-up and the information to answer this qestion is not yet centrally available.
Equal Opportunities
To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage how many and what percentage of officers in grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, respectively, and overall in his Department are women.
The numbers and percentage of women in grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 are as follows:—
| Grade | Number of officers | Number of women | Percentage of women |
| 1 | 1 | — | 0 |
| 2 | — | — | — |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | 33 |
| 4 | 1 | — | 0 |
| 5 | 15 | 4 | 26 |
| 6 | 3 | 1 | 33 |
| 7 | 46 | 10 | 21 |
Hyde Park (Traffic)
To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage what guidance he has issued to the authorities responsible for Hyde park as to the parking arrangements admissible for coaches in connection with demonstrations and marches in order to ensure the free flow of normal traffic in the surrounding streets.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: That the organisers be asked to make arrangements with the public transport authorities to use public transport to get to and from the park whenever possible to avoid unnecessary disruption in local streets. When coaches have to be used it is recommended that they liaise with the police to organise transfers on to the London public transport system before reaching central London; and as a last resort, arrangements be made for coaches to park at agreed locations close to the park. The possible disruption to traffic and local residents is a key factor in early discussions with organisers before any event takes place.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage who has been appointed as a consultant to his Department for market testing.
[holding answer 29 June 1992]: My Department is in the process of appointing a consultant to assist in preparing its market testing programme.
Bushy Park
To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage if he will set out the opening hours on weekdays and Sundays of the woodland garden in Bushy park; whether the park contractors are obliged to comply with these hours; if he will state why the gates were not open by 9.45 am on Sunday 31 May; and what action will be taken to prevent a recurrence.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: The woodland garden in Bushy park opens at 9 am seven days a week. It closes at dusk.Contractors are obliged to unlock the gates at the stated time. This is a scheduled item within the ground maintenance contract.Due to an oversight on the part of the contractor a member of his staff was not available to open the gates at the required time on Sunday 31 May 1992.The contractor was financially penalised for failure to comply with the contract and subsequently gave assurances that it would not happen again. It has now been agreed with the contractor that in order to make sure all gates are open by 9 am he will start unlocking earlier than hitherto.The client duty officer for the day has also been instructed to pay particular attention to the contractor's performance in this area and report any lapse to the park superintendent.
Environment
Ozone Layer
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the latest estimate of the average depletion of the ozone layer on an annualised basis (a) at British latitudes and (b) at all latitudes; and what are the projections of the extent of depletion over the period 2000 to 2050.
The latest estimates of ozone layer depletion remain substantially the same as published in the 1991 report of the Department's stratospheric ozone review group, copies of which are in the Library. Ozone depletion at British latitudes is at a maximum in the early spring, averaging 0.8 per cent. per year. Ozone levels recover substantially during the summer. The annual average depletion taken over all latitudes is about 0.3 per cent. per year—we do not have an equivalent figure for British latitudes. The extent of ozone depletion in future years will depend on how the Montreal protocol controls are tightened, but the review group estimate that under the present controls the potential for ozone depletion will increase until at least 1997, and then decline slowly over the next century.
Marsham Street Offices
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for Aylesbury (Mr. Lidington) of 19 June, Official Report, column 694, what is his timetable for demolishing the Marsham street Government offices.
The planning and development consultants, whose appointment was announced in the answer of 19 June, have just started work. Their advice will assist in identifying the best alternative uses for the site at 2 Marsham street and thereby in establishing a timetable for the reuse of the site. Until that is established I cannot be precise on the timing of demolition.
Homelessness
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how many persons were registered as homeless in the London borough of Newham for each year since 1979.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Angus, East (Mr. Welsh) on 17 June 1992, Official Report, columns 569–70.
Paris Commission
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how the United Kingdom will be represented at the 21 and 22 September meeting of the Paris commission.
I shall be representing the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland at this meeting, together with officials from my Department, the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food and the Department of Trade and Industry.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment which substances the United Kingdom expects to agree completely to eliminate from discharges to water in the United Kingdom, at or as a result of the 21 and 22 September meeting of the Paris commission.
None.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what information he has on proposals from other countries regarding the complete elimination of certain substances in discharges to water, at or as a result of the 21 and 22 meeting of the Paris commission.
The major business of the meeting is the agreement of a new convention concerning the protection of the marine environment in the north-east Atlantic which will replace the existing Oslo and Paris conventions. There are also a number of recommendations to be considered, but none calls for the complete elimination of substances in discharges to water.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what progress the United Kingdom has made in eliminating discharges to water of substances controlled under agreements of the Paris commission; and if he will publish such data.
The United Kingdom has made good progress in implementing Paris commission decisions and recommendations. At the ministerial meeting of the Oslo and Paris commissions being held in September a number of reports will be published on their activities and these will give details of the data submitted by the United Kingdom.
Air Quality
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what assessment he has made of the impact of (a) motor cars, (b) lorries and (c) buses on air quality in (i) urban and (ii) rural areas.
Motor traffic is a growing source of urban and rural air pollution, and much action is already in hand to tackle it. The current position is conveniently summarised in the air quality chapter of the Department's annual "Digest of Environmental Protection and Water Statistics". A copy of the latest volume has been placed in the Library of the House. In addition, the Royal Commission on environmental pollution reported in September 1991 on emissions from heavy duty diesel vehicles.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer that my right hon. Friend the Chancellor for the Duchy of Lancaster gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridgeshire, South-East (Mr. Paice) on 22 June 1992, Official Report, column 102.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
The full cost of the market testing initiative in my Department since November 1991 is estimated at £223,000.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
No such estimate has yet been made.
United Nations Conference On Environment And Development
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if any Government Ministers or officials attended any of the half-day round table meetings sponsored by UNESCO at the recent United Nations Conference on Environment and Development.
No.
Inner Cities Religious Council
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when the Inner Cities Religious Council will hold its first formal meeting; and what its purpose and membership will be.
The first formal meeting of the Inner Cities Religious Council will take place on Monday 20 July. Members will be drawn from the Christian, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim anhd Sikh faiths, under my chairmanship.The Inner Cities Religious Council will allow representatives of the faith communities to discuss policy and practical issues with Government and each other. It will give consideration to the needs of communities in inner cities and deprived urban areas, and the assistance available to meet them, and will also seek to create opportunities for action in such areas involving faith communities in partnership with other local residents, business, voluntary organisations and local and central Government.
Relocation
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what progress has been made in negotiations about his Department's move to Docklands since his oral answers of 2 June, Official Report, columns 707–13.
My Department's advisers are continuing to negotiate in respect of Harbour Exchange, East India Dock and Canary Wharf. In the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Sheffield, Attercliffe (Mr. Betts) on 9 June, Official Report, column 150, I said that a fourth docklands development at Thomas More square, Wapping had been ruled out on the ground of cost. However, the owners of Thomas More square have now sought my agreement to be allowed to enter into the negotiations on the same terms as the other three contenders in docklands. I have agreed that they may do so.
County Hall, London
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if his Department has considered relocating staff from Marsham street to County hall.
[holding answer 26 June 1992]: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 2 June to the hon. Member for Cardiff, West (Mr. Morgan), Official Report, column 368. In the light of that answer, I am not considering the relocation of staff to County hall.
Recycling
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, pursuant to his answer of 13 May, Official Report, column 126, to the hon. Member for Bristol, South (Ms. Primarolo) when the commissioned study into the use of economic instruments to promote recycling will be published.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: We expect to receive the final version of the study shortly. I will then discuss the next steps with my right hon. Friend, the President of the Board of Trade, whose Department is co-sponsoring the study.
Duchy Of Lancaster
Public Record Office
To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what plans he has to introduce a citizen's charter for the Public Record Office.
There are no plans to introduce a charter for the Public Record Office, though the office has published its quality of service and efficiency targets.
Market Testing
To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
The total cost of the market testing initiative in my Department since November 1991 is estimated to have been £139,300.
To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridgeshire, South-East (Mr. Paice) on 22 June 1992, at column 102.
To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
Market testing in the former Management and Personnel Office and in the Office of the Minister for the Civil Service is estimated to have saved some £290,000 in cash terms between 1986–87 and 1991–92.
Land Holdings
To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, pursuant to his answer of 15 June to the hon. Member for Don Valley (Mr. Redmond), Official Report, columns 360–61, if he will list each individual land or property holding of the Duchy, together with its location and capital value.
It would be impractical to list each individual land and property holding belonging to the Duchy, which amount to over 1,000. A summary of land and property holdings is therefore set out.
| £ per week | |||||||||||||
| 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | |||||||
| £ | per cent. increase | £ | per cent. increase | £ | per cent. increase | £ | per cent. increase | £ | per cent. increase | £ | per cent. increase | £ | |
| Average Earnings1 | 89.60 | 23.0 | 110.20 | 13.3 | 124.90 | 9.3 | 136.50 | 8.6 | 148.30 | 7.4 | 159.30 | 7.3 | 171.00 |
| Senior Civil Servants | |||||||||||||
| Head of the Civil Service | 593.87 | 8.1 | 641.76 | 7.0 | 686.69 | 17.2 | 804.60 | 14.3 | 919.54 | 6.8 | 981.80 | 46.3 | 1,436.78 |
| Permanent Secretary to the Treasury | 593.87 | 8.1 | 641.76 | 7.0 | 686.69 | 17.2 | 804.60 | 14.3 | 919.54 | 6.8 | 981.80 | 36.6 | 1,341.00 |
| Grade 1 | 545.98 | 8.8 | 593.88 | 7.0 | 635.44 | 13.8 | 723.18 | 13.2 | 818.97 | 6.4 | 871.65 | 31.9 | 1,149.43 |
| Grade 1A | 498.08 | 9.6 | 545.98 | 7.0 | 584.19 | 14.8 | 670.50 | 12.9 | 756.70 | 6.3 | 804.60 | 31.0 | 1,053.64 |
There are estates predominately agricultural in nature, in the following counties:
Approximate acreage
| |
| Northamptonshire and Lincolnshire | 3,031 |
| Staffordshire and Cheshire | 10,901 |
| Lancashire | 10,617 |
| Yorkshire | 8,111 |
In addition, the Duchy owns some 15,000 acres of moorland in north Yorkshire and south Wales, most of which are subject to common rights.
The estates include some 273 agricultural tenancies and 3,696 acres of woodland.
Other property ownerships (all of which are freehold except for a long leasehold property in the City of London) may be summarised as follows:
- The freehold of properties in the Manor of the Savoy bounded by Lancaster place, the Embankment, Savoy hill and Strand, including the Savoy chapel, and a building at 2/4 Lancaster place to 137 Strand.
On the question of capital value, the Duchy values its properties for internal purposes only and figures are not published.
National Finance
Top Salaries Review Body
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the percentage increase and actual size in pounds per week, in pay for each main group covered by the Top Salaries Review Body for each year since 1979; and what the comparable figures were for an employee on national average earnings for each of those years.
The information requested is set out in the table.
1979
| 1980
| 1981
| 1982
| 1983
| 1984
| 1985
| |||||||
£
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| |
| Grade 2 | |||||||||||||
| range minimum2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 766.28 |
| range maximum | 431.03 | 8.9 | 469.35 | 7.0 | 502.20 | 15.4 | 579.50 | 13.2 | 656.13 | 6.6 | 699.23 | 15.1 | 804.60 |
| Grade 3 | |||||||||||||
| range minimum2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 593.87 |
| range maximum | 344.83 | 13.9 | 392.72 | 7.0 | 420.21 | 14.0 | 478.93 | 11.0 | 531.61 | 6.3 | 565.13 | 15.3 | 651.34 |
| Senior Officers of the Armed Forces | |||||||||||||
| Admiral of the Fleet | 593.87 | 8.1 | 641.76 | 7.0 | 686.69 | 17.2 | 804.60 | 14.3 | 919.54 | 6.8 | 981.80 | 46.3 | 1,436.78 |
| Field Marshal | |||||||||||||
| Marshal of the Royal Air Force | |||||||||||||
| Admiral | 545.98 | 8.8 | 593.88 | 7.0 | 635.44 | 13.8 | 723.18 | 13.2 | 818.97 | 6.4 | 871.65 | 31.9 | 1,149.43 |
| General | |||||||||||||
| Air Chief Marshal | |||||||||||||
| Vice Admiral | 431.03 | 8.9 | 469.35 | 7.0 | 502.20 | 15.4 | 579.50 | 13.2 | 656.13 | 6.6 | 699.23 | 15.1 | 804.60 |
| Lieutenant General | |||||||||||||
| Air Marshal | |||||||||||||
| Rear Admiral | 344.83 | 13.9 | 392.72 | 7.0 | 420.21 | 14.0 | 478.93 | 11.0 | 531.61 | 6.3 | 565.13 | 15.3 | 651.34 |
| Major General | |||||||||||||
| Air Vice-Marshal | |||||||||||||
| Members of the Judiciary3 | |||||||||||||
| Lord Chief Justice | 708.81 | 8.1 | 766.28 | 11.3 | 852.49 | 18.0 | 1,005.75 | 14.3 | 1,149.43 | 6.7 | 1,226.05 | 17.2 | 1,436.78 |
| Lords of Appeal | 651.34 | 8.8 | 708.81 | 10.8 | 785.44 | 17.7 | 924.33 | 14.0 | 1,053.64 | 6.4 | 1,120.69 | 17.9 | 1,321.84 |
| Lords Justices of Appeal | 593.87 | 8.1 | 641.76 | 11.9 | 718.39 | 21.3 | 871.65 | 14.3 | 996.17 | 6.7 | 1,063.22 | 18.9 | 1,264.37 |
| High Court Judges | 545.98 | 12.3 | 613.03 | 9.4 | 670.50 | 21.4 | 814.18 | 12.9 | 919.54 | 6.8 | 981.80 | 17.1 | 1,149.42 |
| Senior Circuit Judges | 387.39 | 11.3 | 431.03 | 8.9 | 469.35 | 18.4 | 555.56 | 12.9 | 627.39 | 6.9 | 670.50 | 27.1 | 852.49 |
| Circuit Judges | 373.56 | 12.8 | 421.46 | 5.7 | 445.40 | 19.4 | 531.61 | 11.7 | 593.87 | 6.5 | 632.18 | 21.2 | 766.28 |
| District Judges | 330.46 | 11.6 | 368.77 | 6.5 | 392.72 | 17.1 | 459.77 | 11.5 | 512.45 | 6.5 | 545.98 | 7.0 | 584.29 |
£ per week
| ||||||||||||
1986
| 1987
| 1988
| 1989
| 1990
| 1991
| |||||||
per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| |
| Average Earnings1 | 8.0 | 184.70 | 7.7 | 198.90 | 9.8 | 218.40 | 9.7 | 239.70 | 9.8 | 263.10 | 8.2 | 284.70 |
| Senior Civil Servants | ||||||||||||
| Head of the Civil Service | 3.2 | 1,482.76 | 4.7 | 1,551.72 | 5.2 | 1,633.14 | 5.0 | 1,714.56 | 7.0 | 1,834.29 | 9.4 | 2,006.70 |
| Permanent Secretary to the Treasury | 3.4 | 1,386.97 | 4.6 | 1,451.15 | 5.3 | 1,527.78 | 5.0 | 1,604.41 | 6.9 | 1,714.56 | 9.5 | 1,877.39 |
| Grade 1 | 3.5 | 1,189.66 | 4.7 | 1,245.21 | 5.4 | 1,312.26 | 5.1 | 1,379.31 | 6.9 | 1,475.10 | 9.4 | 1,613.98 |
| Grade 1A | 3.3 | 1,088.12 | 4.8 | 1,139.85 | 5.5 | 1,202.11 | 5.2 | 1,264.37 | 7.2 | 1,355.36 | 9.5 | 1,484.67 |
| Grade 2 | ||||||||||||
| range minimum2 | 3.8 | 795.02 | 4.8 | 833.33 | 5.3 | 877.39 | 5.0 | 921.46 | 14.1 | 1,051.72 | 9.5 | 1,151.34 |
| range maximum | 19.4 | 833.33 | 7.7 | 1,034.73 | 5.6 | 1,091.95 | 4.9 | 1,145.59 | 7.5 | 1,231.80 | 9.5 | 1,348.66 |
| Grade 3 | ||||||||||||
| range minimum2 | 4.4 | 619.73 | 5.1 | 651.34 | 5.3 | 685.82 | 5.0 | 720.31 | 16.5 | 839.08 | 9.6 | 919.54 |
| range maximum | 17.6 | 766.38 | 7.5 | 823.75 | 5.3 | 867.82 | 5.1 | 911.88 | 9.5 | 998.08 | 6.9 | 1,067.05 |
| Senior Officers of the Armed Forces | ||||||||||||
| Admiral of the Fleet | 3.2 | 1,482.76 | 4.7 | 1,551.72 | 5.2 | 1,633.14 | 5.0 | 1,714.56 | 7.0 | 1,834.29 | 9.4 | 2,006.70 |
| Field Marshal | ||||||||||||
| Marshal of the Royal Air Force | ||||||||||||
| Admiral | 3.5 | 1,189.66 | 4.7 | 1,245.21 | 5.4 | 1,312.26 | 5.1 | 1,379.31 | 6.9 | 1,475.09 | 9.4 | 1,613.98 |
| General | ||||||||||||
| Air Chief Marshal | ||||||||||||
| Vice Admiral | 3.6 | 833.33 | 4.6 | 871.65 | 5.5 | 919.54 | 5.0 | 965.52 | 9.7 | 1,059.39 | 9.6 | 1,160.92 |
| Lieutenant General | ||||||||||||
| Air Marshal | ||||||||||||
1986
| 1987
| 1988
| 1989
| 1990
| 1991
| |||||||
per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| per cent. increase
| £
| |
| Rear Admiral | 4.0 | 677.20 | 4.7 | 708.81 | 5.4 | 747.13 | 10–5 | 825.67 | 9.7 | 906.13 | 12.1 | 1,015.33 |
| Major General | ||||||||||||
| Air Vice-Marshal | ||||||||||||
| Members of the Judiciary3 | ||||||||||||
| Lord Chief Justice | 3.2 | 1,482.76 | 4.7 | 1,551.72 | 5.2 | 1,633.14 | 5.0 | 1,714.56 | 7.0 | 1,834.29 | 9.4 | 2,006.70 |
| Lords of Appeal | 3.5 | 1,367.82 | 4.7 | 1,431.99 | 5.4 | 1,508.62 | 5.1 | 1,585.25 | 6.9 | 1,695.40 | 9.6 | 1,858.24 |
| Lords Justices of Appeal | 3.6 | 1,310.34 | 4.9 | 1,374.52 | 5.6 | 1,451.15 | 5.0 | 1,522.99 | 6.9 | 1,628.35 | 9.4 | 1,781.61 |
| High Court Judges | 3.5 | 1,189.65 | 4.7 | 1,245.21 | 5.4 | 1,312.26 | 5.1 | 1,379.31 | 6.9 | 1,475.10 | 9.4 | 1,613.98 |
| Senior Circuit Judges | 3.4 | 881.23 | 4.9 | 924.33 | 5.5 | 975.10 | 4.9 | 1,022.99 | 10.3 | 1,128.35 | 16.1 | 1,310.34 |
| Circuit Judges | 3.8 | 795.02 | 4.8 | 833.33 | 5.3 | 877.39 | 5.0 | 921.45 | 10.3 | 1,016.35 | 16.1 | 1,180.08 |
| District Judges | 4.4 | 610.15 | 5.2 | 641.76 | 11.9 | 718.39 | 5.1 | 754.79 | 10.3 | 832.37 | 16.2 | 967.43 |
Notes:
A. All rates quoted are national rates. They do not include a London scale introduced for Civil Service grades 2 and 3 in 1990.
B. All rates quoted were either paid from 1 April or phased in during the following year.
Footnotes:
1 Source New Earnings Survey.
2 Range pay introduced from 1985.
3 Posts shown are key examples of those within the judicial salary structure.
Taxation
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will issue guidelines to local tax offices on the taxation of payments made to employees by way of compensation for breach of contract, classifying the schedule under which such tax is collected; and if he will make a statement.
Payments of compensation for loss of office are chargeable to income tax under section 148 of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988. Local tax offices have detailed instructions on how to deal with such cases.
Business Expansion Scheme
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will provide a table of expenditure on the business expansion scheme cross-referenced to standard regions, showing Greater London as a separate region, for each year from 1984–85 (a) at cash prices and (b) at 1984–85 prices.
I regret that the information requested is not available. Available information is published in chapter 7 of "Inland Revenue Statistics 1991". Regional analyses are given in tables 7.5 and 7.6.
Market Testing
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
An announcement will be made in due course.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
No estimate has yet been made, since details of the programme have still to be settled.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer which parts of his Department are going to be market-tested following the review which has recently been undertaken as a result of 'Competing for Quality'.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: An announcement will be made in due course.
Departmental Staff
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the responsibilities of each of the deputy secretaries in his Department and the numbers and ranks of staff reporting to each.
[pursuant to his reply, 24 June 1992 c. 223–24]: I regret that a column in the table was omitted from the reply. The complete reply is as follows:The responsibilities of each of the deputy secretaries in the Treasury are as follows. The information on the numbers of staff reporting to each is contained in the table.
Deputy Secretary (Overseas Finance):
Responsible for:
- European Community Group
- Aid and Export Finance Group
- International Finance Group
Deputy Secretary (Public Finance)
Responsible for:
- Fiscal Policy Group
- Monetary Policy Group
Deputy Secretary (Public Services)
Responsible for:
- Local Government Group
- Health, Social Services and Territorial Group
- Running Costs Division (part)
- Central Unit on Purchasing
- (also has responsibility for CCTA which is to be transferred to the Office for Public Services and Science in due course)
Deputy Secretary (Civil Service Management and Pay)
Responsible for:
- Pay Group
- Personnel Policy Group
- Management Policy and Running Costs Group
- CS Catering Organisation (Forward)
Deputy Secretary (Industry)
Responsible for:
- Public Enterprises Group
- Industry, Agriculture and Employment Group
- Home and Education Group
Grade
| DS Overseas Finance
| DS Public Finance
| DS Public services
| DS CS Management and pay
| DS Industry
| DS Financial institutions and markets
|
| G3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| G4 | — | — | — | 1 | — | 1 |
| G5 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 5 |
| G6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 1 |
| G7 | 17 | 9 | 16 | 42 | 17 | 16 |
| SE0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 37 | 3 | 6 |
| HEO | 4 | 1 | 10 | 30 | 13 | 13 |
| HEO(D) | 2 | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 |
| AT | — | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| EO | 9 | 4 | 8 | 45 | 10 | 12 |
| SAS | — | — | — | 2 | — | — |
| AS | — | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| SSO | — | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| HSO | — | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| SEA | 2 | 4 | — | — | — | 1 |
| EA | 3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| AO | 11 | 6 | 10 | 43 | 16 | 14 |
| AA | 4 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 6 | 8 |
| SPS | 1 | — | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| PS | 11 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 10 | 8 |
| Typist | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| SB2 | — | — | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Total | 81 | 48 | 87 | 265 | 97 | 97 |
Notes:
1. Staff in post figures as at 1 June 1992, except for Financial Services command which includes latest estimate of staff being transferred from DTI.
2. Figures for part-time staff rounded down.
3. In addition to the above staff there are 761 staff in the following commands:
First Permanent Secretary, Second Permanent Secretary responsible for Public Expenditure (ie, the General Expenditure Policy Group and the Defence Policy and Material Group), Chief Economic Adviser, Chief Accountancy Adviser and the Establishments and Organisation Group.
House Of Commons Commission
Recycled Stationery
To ask the right hon. Member for Berwick-upon-Tweed, as representing the House of Commons Commission if steps will be taken to ensure that stocks of recycled stationery are permanently kept in all the stationery cupboards adjacent to offices.
I understand that steps have been taken for stationery cupboards to be stocked with recycled stationery where a particular demand has been identified.
Prime Minister
Freedom Of Movement (Doctors)
To ask the Prime Minister if he will use the British presidency of the EC Council of Ministers to press for reform of the EC directive granting freedom of movement within Europe to doctors so as to include doctors who qualified in non-EC countries.
Before we could agree to any such proposals we should need to be satisfied with the standard of non-EC qualifications recognised in other member states.
Deputy Secretary (Financial Institutions and Markets)
Responsible for:
- Banking Group
- Securities and Investment Services Group (formerly the Financial Service Division of the DTI, transferred to the Treasury in June 1992).
Our overriding aim must be to ensure that the safety and high quality of medical care provided for NHS patients is not endangered.
The Commission is examining the issue and negotiations are taking place between health officials of member states.
Education
Schools, Buckinghamshire
To ask the Secretary of State for Education when he expects to determine the school standard number reductions proposed by Buckinghamshire county council in respect of (a) Shelburne County first school, High Wycombe, (b) Loudwater County combined school, High Wycombe, (c) Gerrards Cross Church of England combined school, Gerrards Cross and (d) Waddesdon County combined school, New Aylesbury.
My right hon. Friend is currently considering the applications made by Buckinghamshire county council to reduce the standard number at these schools. He hopes to announce his decision on the applications in the very near future.
Examinations
To ask the Secretary of State for Education (1) when he will publish information collected from the 1991 school examination survey.(2) when he will publish information collected from 1991 Form 7d about the national performance in GCSE and A/AS level examinations.
The standard statistical bulletin drawing from the information collected by the 1991 schools examination survey—Form 7d—is expected to be published towards the end of July.
School Governors
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many new school governors he expects to recruit as a result of the school governor recruitment campaign.
Evidence suggests that around 75,000 school governor vacancies will need to be filled in the autumn. Our national campaign to raise awareness of governor issues is proving successful. We are confident that sufficient numbers of potential school governors will come forward.
Grant-Maintained Schools
To ask the Secretary of State for Education (1) what plans he has to bring forward proposals to empower the Audit Commission to audit or appoint auditors for the accounts of grant-maintained schools;(2) how many grant-maintained schools have sought the advice of the Audit Commission under section 220 of the Education Reform Act 1988.
The Audit Commission is empowered to audit grant maintained schools, but it is for the governing body of each school to appoint their auditors. My Department does not have any information on the number of schools that have sought advice from the Audit Commission.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what projections have been made for the number of grant-maintained schools for each year for the next five years.
I expect the numbers of grant-maintained schools to continue to increase markedly over the next few years and to see grant-maintained status become the natural organisational model for schools.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education if he will carry out an investigation into the effect of the grant-maintained status of schools on parental choice in Hillingdon, Ealing and Bromley education authorities.
The option of grant-maintained status for schools enhances choice for parents. We are aware that the allocation of secondary school places for September has taken slightly longer than usual this year in Bromley and Hillingdon. The Department has discussed the position with the two local education authorities and is encouraging co-operation between the LEAs and grant-maintained schools on a voluntary basis in order to minimise delays in allocations without restricting choice. The Department is not aware of any difficulties over parental choice in Ealing.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education whether schools applying for grant-maintained status have to supply him with details of their admissions policy.
All proposals for grant-maintained status must set out the proposed admission arrangements for the school. The arrangements have to be approved by my right hon. Friend as part of the approval of grant-maintained status.
Pupil Exclusions
To ask the Secretary of State for Education if he will establish a national system to monitor the number of exclusions of pupils from schools.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many pupils have been expelled (a) permanently and (b) temporarily from schools in the United Kingdom for each year since 1981; and if he will make a statement.
Where schools in England are concerned, information on temporary exclusions is not collected centrally. Information on permanent exclusions is being collected under the national exclusions reporting system —NERS—over a two-year period beginning with the summer term 1990. Data from year one of the exercise are being analysed; those for year two are still coming in. My right hon. Friend will review the operation of the exclusion provisions of the Education (No. 2) Act 1986 in the light of the NERS data and other evidence.
Further Education Colleges
To ask the Secretary of State for Education if he will make a statement about the role of Coopers and Lybrand in assisting further education and sixth form colleges with their new management responsibilities.
Subject to contract, Coopers and Lybrand Deloitte has been asked to carry out a review of the preparations being made for independence by each of the colleges that will enter the new further education sector on 1 April 1993. It will provide advice and assistance to individual colleges and will assess whether their controls and systems are adequate to safeguard the public funds to be entrusted to them by the Further Education Funding Council.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
A preliminary estimate of the full cost of the market testing initiative within the Department and the Teachers' Pensions Agency since November 1991 is £55,000.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
No such estimate has yet been made.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
As stated in the White Paper "Competing for Quality", targets for the market testing programme for 1992–93 for the Department and the Teachers' Pensions Agency will be announced later this year.
Transitional Funding
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how much money has been allocated to further education councils under transitional funding arrangements; and on what specific projects.
A total of £25 million will be made available to the Further Education Funding Council for England in 1992–93 to meet transitional costs involved in establishing the new further education sector, including grants to FE corporations and the running costs of the council. Funding for the Further Education Funding Council for Wales is a matter for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales. I am advised that he has allocated £2 million to the council for Wales to meet transitional costs in 1992–93.
Special Educational Needs
To ask the Secretary of State for Education if he will publish a list setting out the percentage of children statemented in primary schools in each local education authority area in 1990, 1991 and 1992.
The percentages of pupils with statements of special educational needs in maintained primary schools, in each local education authority in England, in January 1990 and 1991 are shown in the table. Information for January 1992 is not yet available.
| Percentage of pupils with statements of special educational needs in maintained primary schools in each local education authority in England | ||
| 1990 | 1991 | |
| City | — | 0.96 |
| Camden | — | 0.90 |
| Greenwich | — | 0.94 |
| Hackney | — | 1.06 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | — | 0.90 |
| Islington | — | 1.27 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | — | 0.51 |
| Lambeth | — | 1.19 |
| Lewisham | — | 0.52 |
| Southwark | — | 0.99 |
| Tower Hamlets | — | 0.50 |
| Wandsworth | — | 1.50 |
| Westminster | — | 0.59 |
| ILEA | 0.90 | — |
| Barking | 0.41 | 0.63 |
| Barnet | 0.46 | 0.48 |
| Bexley | 0.98 | 0.97 |
| Brent | 0.24 | 0.27 |
| Bromley | 1.64 | 1.71 |
| Croydon | 0.79 | 0.66 |
| Ealing | 0.41 | 0.55 |
| Enfield | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| Haringey | 0.24 | 0.27 |
| Harrow | 0.75 | 0.87 |
| Havering | 0.69 | 0.92 |
| Hillingdon | 0.34 | 0.38 |
| Hounslow | 1.38 | 1.70 |
| Kingston upon Thames | 0.52 | 0.67 |
| Merton | 0.55 | 0.76 |
| Newham | 0.47 | 0.69 |
| Redbridge | 0.20 | 0.25 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 0.90 | 1.02 |
| Sutton | 0.73 | 0.92 |
| Waltham Forest | 0.29 | 0.33 |
1990
| 1991
| |
| Birmingham | 0.35 | 0.34 |
| Coventry | 0.26 | 0.27 |
| Dudley | 0.56 | 0.52 |
| Sandwell | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Solihull | 0.76 | 0.77 |
| Walsall | 0.48 | 0.67 |
| Wolverhampton | 0.73 | 0.76 |
| Knowsley | 0.28 | 0.50 |
| Liverpool | 0.24 | 0.28 |
| St. Helens | 0.56 | 0.65 |
| Sefton | 0.56 | 0.68 |
| Wirral | 0.93 | 0.98 |
| Bolton | 0.29 | 0.37 |
| Bury | 1.39 | 1.55 |
| Manchester | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Oldham | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Rochdale | 0.56 | 0.64 |
| Salford | 0.33 | 0.41 |
| Stockport | 1.25 | 1.46 |
| Tameside | 1.19 | 1.23 |
| Trafford | 0.88 | 0.88 |
| Wigan | 0.50 | 0.94 |
| Barnsley | 0.51 | 0.76 |
| Doncaster | 0.33 | 0.35 |
| Rotherham | 0.52 | 0.78 |
| Sheffield | 0.79 | 0.66 |
| Bradford | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Calderdale | 0.61 | 0.69 |
| Kirklees | 1.06 | 1.24 |
| Leeds | 1.13 | 1.07 |
| Wakefield | 0.43 | 0.45 |
| Gateshead | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | 0.64 | 0.64 |
| North Tyneside | 0.77 | 0.90 |
| South Tyneside | 0.65 | 0.63 |
| Sunderland | 0.51 | 0.55 |
| Isles of Scilly | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Avon | 0.94 | 0.71 |
| Bedfordshire | 0.61 | 0.69 |
| Berkshire | 0.65 | 0.79 |
| Buckinghamshire | 1.05 | 1.17 |
| Cambridgeshire | 0.89 | 0.86 |
| Cheshire | 1.30 | 1.38 |
| Cleveland | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| Cornwall | 2.12 | 2.16 |
| Cumbria | 1.28 | 1.44 |
| Derbyshire | 1.07 | 1.17 |
| Devon | 1.42 | 1.61 |
| Dorset | 0.46 | 0.39 |
| Durham | 0.66 | 0.75 |
| East Sussex | 0.12 | 0.19 |
| Essex | 0.66 | 0.66 |
| Gloucestershire | 0.30 | 0.43 |
| Hampshire | 0.64 | 0.91 |
| Hereford and Worcester | 0.30 | 0.45 |
| Hertfordshire | 0.89 | 0.98 |
| Humberside | 0.53 | 0.55 |
| Isle of Wight | 0.64 | 0.58 |
| Kent | 0.57 | 0.70 |
| Lancashire | 0.70 | 0.84 |
| Leicestershire | 0.74 | 0.83 |
| Lincolnshire | 0.83 | 0.98 |
| Norfolk | 1.50 | 1.65 |
| North Yorkshire | 0.89 | 0.99 |
| Northamptonshire | 0.48 | 0.57 |
| Northumberland | 0.72 | 0.83 |
| Nottinghamshire | 0.06 | 0.12 |
| Oxfordshire | 0.07 | 0.24 |
| Shropshire | 1.01 | 1.37 |
| Somerset | 1.29 | 0.90 |
| Staffordshire | 0.49 | 0.59 |
| Suffolk | 1.51 | 1.41 |
| Surrey | 1.56 | 1.67 |
| Warwickshire | 0.44 | 0.53 |
| West Sussex | 0.37 | 0.40 |
| Wiltshire | 1.79 | 2.02 |
| England | 0.73 | 0.81 |
School Places
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what information he has on the number of schools which do not have sufficient places to meet the demand from parents for their children; and what provisions are proposed to enable schools to expand to meet the demand.
This information is not held centrally.It is for local authorities to ensure that there are sufficient school places within their area to meet the demand. We have recently announced that we intend to make capital resources available to enable good schools which are popular with parents to expand, provided that, for schools which they maintain, the LEA give their application appropriate priority. We have consulted the local authority associations, denominational bodies and others concerned about this. Details of the operation of this initiative will be issued shortly to LEAs and others.
Second-Tier Schools
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to his oral answer of 23 June, Official Report, column 123, what time scale he puts on the elimination of second-tier schools.
The Government are committed to raising standards across the board, in particular through the national curriculum and by maximum delegation of responsibility to individual schools through local management of schools and, increasingly, by the acquisition of GM status. Steady progress is being made towards our objective of the highest possible standards in all schools.
Lord Chancellor's Department
Asylum Bill
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department, if he proposes to appoint any special inspectors in terms of the Asylum Bill introduced in the last Parliament.
There is no provision for special adjudicators in current immigration legislation. The Asylum Bill introduced in the last Parliament fell with the dissolution of that Parliament. The designation of special adjudicators will be addressed after the enactment of the legislation the Government propose to introduce later this Session.
Market Testing
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department, if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested: and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster to my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridgeshire, South-East (Mr. Paice) on 22 June 1992, at column 102.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department, what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
The full cost of the market testing initiative in our Department since November 1991 has been £84,495.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department, what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
No such estimate has been made.
Land Registry
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department, what are the key performance targets for Her Majesty's Land Registry executive agency for 1992–93.
The table sets out the key performance targets that my noble and learned Friend the Lord Chancellor has set for Her Majesty's Land Registry executive agency for 1992–93.
| HM Land Registry Executive Agency Key performance targets 1992–93 | |
| Indicator | Target |
| 1. PRODUCTIVITY | |
| Progressive reduction in unit costs | To achieve or better a 6 per cent. improvement over the 3 year period 1991–92 to 1993–94 |
| Progressive increase in output per post per year | |
| 2. QUALITY OF SERVICE | |
| Speed | |
| Percentage of pre-completion applications handled in three days | 92 per cent. |
| Average handling time for post completion applications | 6 weeks |
| Accuracy | |
| Percentage of pre-completion applications handled free of error | 99.65 per cent. |
| Percentage of post-completion applications handled free of error | 97.50 per cent. |
| Complaints | |
| Number and kind of complaints | Targets to be established |
| 3. DEVELOPMENT OF LAND REGISTRATION | |
| Number of registered titles compared with estimated potential titles1 | Registered 14.50 million |
| Potential 21.00 million | |
| New and converted computerised titles compared with manual stock1 | Computerised 6.00 million |
| Manual 8.50 million | |
| 1 Activity in the conveyancing market and the consequent number of transactions directly affects totals at the year end. | |
Legal Aid
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what contributions to criminal legal aid by defendants over the past 10 years have (a) been ordered by the court and (b) been paid.
For the amount of contributions to criminal legal aid paid by defendants over the last 10 years, I refer my hon. and learned Friend to my reply to the hon. Member for Wallsend (Mr. Byers) on 21 May 1992, Official Report columns 207–8. Information on the amount of contributions ordered by the courts is not collected centrally.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what has been the cost of criminal legal aid to the Exchequer over each of the past
| Criminal legal aid expenditure (£ million) | |||||
| Financial Year | Magistrates' courts payments | Higher courts payments | Other payments | Receipts | Cost to the Exchequer |
| 1982–83 | 56.12 | 51.98 | 5.77 | 1.77 | 112.10 |
| 1983–84 | 62.18 | 58.81 | 7.12 | 2.03 | 126.08 |
| 1984–85 | 68.06 | 67.95 | 10.21 | 1.98 | 144.23 |
| 1985–86 | 81.35 | 75.29 | 15.22 | 1.98 | 169.88 |
| 1986–87 | 87.07 | 91.83 | 29.59 | 2.35 | 206.14 |
| 1987–88 | 114.02 | 100.09 | 37.84 | 2.90 | 249.05 |
| 1988–89 | 127.39 | 119.30 | 39.78 | 3–06 | 283.41 |
| 1989–90 | 151–48 | 135.05 | 47.94 | 3.68 | 330.79 |
| 1990–91 | 174.90 | 157.81 | 56.01 | 4.54 | 384.18 |
| 1991–92 | 212.03 | 187.47 | 76.32 | 3.38 | 472.44 |
Note: It was not possible to divide legal aid expenditure between the Crown and Appeal courts in each of the past 10 years, therefore higher courts expenditure has been provided instead.
Criminal Proceedings
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department, in criminal proceedings over each of the past 10 years (a) what amount of fines have been paid by defendants and (b) what amount of costs have been recovered from defendants.
The total income from fines, fixed penalties and fees, and the total costs recovered from defendants and others in the last 10 years is set out in the table. The substantial fall in the amount of costs recovered between 1985–86 and 1986–87 followed the establishment of the Crown prosecution service: since 1 April 1986 most orders for costs are in respect of costs payable to the Crown prosecution service.
| Year | Fines and fees £ million | Cost recovered £ million |
| 1982–83 | 113 | 3.215 |
| 1983–84 | 128 | 3.379 |
| 1984–85 | 124 | 3.509 |
| 1985–86 | 143 | 3.775 |
| 1986–87 | 159 | 0.057 |
| 1987–88 | 185 | 0.111 |
| 1988–89 | 189 | 0.040 |
| 1989–90 | 241 | 0.044 |
| 1990–91 | 269 | 0.043 |
| 1991–92 | 238 | 0.046 |
War Crimes
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department how many files relating to war crimes in the Channel Islands during world war two are retained by his Department and withheld from the Public Record Office.
No files relating to war crimes in the Channel islands are retained by my Department.
10 years; and how that cost divides between (a) magistrates courts, (b) Crown courts, (c) the Appeal court and (d) others.
In each of the past 10 years, the cost to the Exchequer of criminal legal aid, divided between magistrates' courts, higher courts and others, was as follows:
Court Of Protection
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department whether the Court of Protection produces annual reports or any other review of its performance in managing investments.
Reviews of investment performance for individual portfolios which need active management will normally be undertaken by the appointed stockbroker or financial adviser. These are examined by the receiver and the court.At a more general level, the Lord Chancellor's honorary investment advisory committee meets regularly to review and comment on investment policy.
Public Trust Office
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department if he will set up an inquiry into the way in which the Public Trust Office cares for and protects the assets of people who are, due to mental disorder, incapable of managing their own property and affairs.
The work of the Public Trust Office, and in particular the work connected with the administration of the financial affairs of mentally incapacitated adults, is presently, or is shortly to be, the subject of a number of reviews. The office is being reviewed by officials of the Lord Chancellor's Department as part of the Government's next steps initiative. The Comptroller and Auditor General has begun a value for money study of the work the Public Trust Office undertakes in the care and protection of mental patients' assets. In addition, the Law Commission is also undertaking work in this area. In view of these studies I do not believe it would be right, or necessary, to set up a separate inquiry.
Mentally Incapacitated People
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department when he expects the Law Commission to publish its proposals relating to the adequacy of legal and other procedures for decision-making on behalf of mentally incapacitated adults.
The Law Commission published its consultation paper "Mentally Incapacitated Adults and Decision Making: an Overview" on 30 April 1991. That paper produced a large number of responses in the light of which the commission is now considering its future programme of work on this topic and may undertake further consultation before publishing any final proposals.
Overseas Development
Population Growth
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs in what specific respects the projected new United Nations Sustainable Development Commission takes account of world population growth.
The details of the Sustainable Development Commission will be considered by the United Nations General Assembly in the autumn. The commission will be looking at all aspects of the follow-up to the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, of which population growth is an important part.
Malawi
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what measures Her Majesty's Government have taken to ensure that the humanitarian aid for Malawi is reaching the targeted groups.
The £7 million of United Kingdom bilateral humanitarian aid recently committed to Malawi is being channelled through the World Food Programme and non-governmental organisations which have established procedures and the capacity of targeting beneficiaries and for monitoring the effectiveness of aid delivery.In Malawi, Her Majesty's Government's representatives are participating in a committee, consisting of the Malawi Government, donors and non-governmental organisations which has been established to monitor the drought situation, including the identification and targeting of those most in need.
Population Control
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the sums given to (a) the International Planned Parenthood Federation and (b) the United Nations population fund in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available.
The information is as follows:
| £ thousands | ||
| IPPF | UNFPA | |
| 1981 | 2,150 | 2,250 |
| 1982 | 2,550 | 2,650 |
| 1983 | 2,700 | 2,700 |
| 1984 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| 1985 | 4,500 | 4,500 |
| 1986 | 5,400 | 4,500 |
| 1987 | 6,000 | 5,000 |
| 1988 | 5,479 | 5,250 |
| 1989 | 18,255 | 5,500 |
| 1990 | 17,488 | 26,000 |
| 1991 | 7,2623 | 7,500 |
| 1 From 1989 onwards the figures include contributions to IPPF Aids unit. | ||
| 2 £3 million of 1990 contribution actually paid in February 1991. | ||
| 3 Provisional. | ||
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (1) what sums have been given to the Chinese Government for the purposes of population control;(2) what grants have been given by the International Planned Parenthood Federation and the United Nations population fund partly or wholly for the purpose of aiding population control programmes in China; and what sums are involved.
We have made no bilateral contributions to the Chinese Government for the purposes of population control.The International Planned Parenthood Federation is contributing some US$1 million a year in technical and financial support to the non-governmental Family Planning Association of China. The Chinese FPA's programme covers family life and parenting education, including information on the full range of contraceptive methods provided through the Government services, to help increase people's awareness of the choices available to them. It supplies no clinical services.The United Nations population fund contributes some US$10 million a year focusing on provision of reliable contraceptives, the extension of maternal and child health care and family planning services, development of special income generating and community development projects to improve the lives and status of rural women, and strengthening population education in schools.The British Government do not and will not support coercive approaches to family planning or the use of abortion as a means of contraception: nor do either of these organisations.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what information he has on the refusal of the United States Government to provide funds for both the International Planned Parenthood Federation and the United Nations population fund since 1984; and if he will make a statement.
The United States Government do not support the International Planned Parenthood Federation and the United Nations population fund under its "Mexico City Population Policy" set out in 1984, and the subsequent Kemp-Kasten amendment enacted in 1985. A United States Administration explanation of their policy has been deposited in the Libraries of the House. The United States has not withdrawn from funding population programmes worldwide and remains the largest bilateral aid donor for family planning programmes.
Overseas Aid
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what was the value of (a) 1979–80 and (b) 1989–90 overseas aid budgets expressed in 1991–92 price terms.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: Net expenditure on overseas aid expressed in 1991–92 prices was £1,853 million in 1979–80 and £1,738 million in 1989–90.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what share of gross national product has been devoted to overseas aid in every year since 1979.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: The information is as follows:
| Calendar Year | Net Official Development Assistance as percentage of GNP |
| 1979 | 0.51 |
| 1980 | 0.35 |
| 1981 | 0.42 |
| 1982 | 0.37 |
| 1983 | 0.35 |
| 1984 | 0.33 |
| 1985 | 0.33 |
| 1986 | 0.31 |
| 1987 | 0.28 |
| 1988 | 0.32 |
| 1989 | 0.31 |
| 1990 | 0.27 |
| 1991 | 0.32 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what share of their gross national product is devoted to overseas aid by each OECD and EC country.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: This information is available for countries which are members of the development assistance committee of the OECD, of which 10 are member states of the EC. The latest figures are for 1991:
| Net official development assistance as a percentage of GNP | |
| Country | Per cent. |
| EC member states | |
| Belgium | 0.41 |
| Denmark | 0.96 |
| France | 10.56 |
| Germany | 0.40 |
| Ireland | 0.19 |
| Italy | 0.25 |
| Netherlands | 0.88 |
| Portugal | 0.28 |
| Spain | 0.23 |
| United Kingdom | 0.32 |
| Non-EC member states | |
| Australia | 0.38 |
| Austria | 0.34 |
| Canada | 0£45 |
| Finland | 0.76 |
Country
| Per cent.
|
| Japan | 0.32 |
| New Zealand | 0.23 |
| Norway | 1.14 |
| Sweden | 0.92 |
| Switzerland | 0.32 |
| United States | 0.17 |
1 0.80 if assistance to Overseas Departments and Territories is included. | |
Wales
Rural Housing
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how much money Housing for Wales has invested in the provision of rural housing in each of the last three years; and what proportion that represents of Housing for Wales' overall budget.
Net programme expenditure on rural housing is given in the table:
| Year | £ million | Per cent. |
| 1989–90 | 19.0 | 22.5 |
| 1990–91 | 23.6 | 24.3 |
| 1991–92 | 34.7 | 28.0 |
Homelessness
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many individuals were registered under the homeless persons legislation as being homeless in Cynon Valley in each year since 1979; and what was the percentage change in each year on the previous year.
Numbers of persons in households accepted as homeless by Cynon Valley borough council under the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977 and part III of the Housing Act 1985 are given in the table:
| Number of persons in households accepted as homeless Cynon Valley | ||
| Year | Number | Percentage change on previous year |
| 1979 | 898 | — |
| 1980 | 1,018 | 13.4 |
| 1981 | 965 | -5.2 |
| 1982 | 985 | 2.1 |
| 1983 | 1,207 | 22.5 |
| 1984 | 959 | -20.5 |
| 1985 | 840 | -12.4 |
| 1986 | 942 | 12.1 |
| 1987 | 603 | -36.0 |
| 1988 | 710 | 17.7 |
| 1989 | 530 | -25.4 |
| 1990 | 623 | 17.5 |
| 1991 | 1,017 | 63.2 |
Council Tax
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales (1) what steps he has taken to satisfy himself that districts and boroughs in Wales have received sufficient central Government moneys to enable them to prepare for the council tax; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he will fully reimburse the boroughs and districts of Wales their costs on council tax preparations.
My proposals for assisting local authorities in Wales in preparing for the council tax were debated and approved by the House on 24 June.
Nurses' Grading
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many appeals have been determined in respect of nurse grading (a) in Wales and (b) in each health authority in Wales, in each month since the current process started; and how many, in each case, were (i) allowed and (ii) disallowed in each month.
Information in the form requested on numbers of clinical grading appeals determined by employing authorities is not collected centrally. Current available information on total numbers of appeals heard at employing authority level is shown in the table:
| Year | Month | Appeals heard | Allowed | Disallowed | Failure to agree |
| Clwyd | |||||
| 1990 | October | 12 | — | 1 | 11 |
| 1991 | October | 15 | — | — | 15 |
| 1992 | May | 10 | — | — | 10 |
| TOTAL | 37 | — | 1 | 36 | |
| East Dyfed | |||||
| 1990 | November | 8 | — | — | 8 |
| 1991 | April | 7 | 1 | — | 6 |
| September | 3 | 3 | — | — | |
| October | 7 | — | — | 7 | |
| TOTAL | 25 | 4 | — | 21 | |
| Gwent | |||||
| 1990 | April | 6 | 3 | — | 3 |
| 1992 | February | 27 | 4 | 12 | 11 |
| April | 35 | — | 24 | 11 | |
| May | 7 | 2 | — | 5 | |
| TOTAL | 75 | 9 | 36 | 30 | |
| Gwynedd | |||||
| 1989 | November | 2 | — | — | 2 |
| 1990 | January | 5 | 2 | — | 3 |
| April | 10 | 4 | — | 6 | |
| May | 12 | 1 | — | 11 | |
| August | 15 | 3 | — | 12 | |
| 1991 | January | 15 | 6 | 1 | 8 |
| April | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | |
| June | 10 | 8 | — | 2 | |
| August | 13 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |
| TOTAL | 89 | 32 | 3 | 54 | |
| Mid Glamorgan | |||||
| 1991 | June | 11 | — | — | 11 |
| October | 8 | 4 | 4 | — | |
| 1992 | April | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| TOTAL | 28 | 7 | 6 | 15 | |
| Powys | |||||
| 1990 | May | 12 | 9 | — | 3 |
| 1991 | February | 7 | 4 | — | 3 |
| 1992 | April | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| TOTAL | 28 | 15 | 1 | 12 | |
| South Glamorgan | |||||
| 1990 | October | 8 | — | — | 8 |
| 1991 | January | 15 | — | 2 | 13 |
| July | 2 | — | — | 2 | |
Health authority
| Appeals heard
| Allowed
| Disallowed
|
| Clwyd | 355 | 99 | 256 |
| East Dyfed | 278 | 80 | 198 |
| Gwent | 710 | 86 | 624 |
| Gwynedd | 704 | 54 | 650 |
| Mid Glamorgan | 531 | 64 | 467 |
| Pembrokeshire | 85 | 13 | 72 |
| Powys | 578 | 312 | 266 |
| South Glamorgan | 670 | 84 | 586 |
| West Glamorgan | 293 | 17 | 276 |
| WALES | 4,204 | 809 | 3,395 |
Other appeals have been withdrawn or conceded without a formal hearing.
At the Welsh appeals committee—regional—level 345 appeals have been dealt with and are as follows:
Year
| Month
| Appeals heard
| Allowed
| Disallowed
| Failure to agree
|
| 1992 | May | 1 | — | — | 1 |
| TOTAL | 26 | — | 2 | 24 | |
West Glamorgan
| |||||
| 1990 | September | 5 | 2 | — | 3 |
| 1991 | March | 19 | — | — | 19 |
| July | 5 | — | — | 5 | |
| August | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1992 | February | 2 | 1 | — | 1 |
| March | 2 | 1 | 1 | — | |
| TOTAL | 37 | 5 | 2 | 30 | |
At the national, negotiating council level, six Welsh appeals have been heard and are as follows:
Health authority
| Appeals heard
| Allowed
| Disallowed
| Failure to agree
|
| East Dyfed April 1991 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Gwent January 1991 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Powys April 1991 | 4 | — | — | 4 |
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will he made publicly available.
As promised in the White Paper "Competing for Quality" Cm. 1730, targets for the market testing programme will be announced later this year.
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what has been the total cost so far of the market testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
The estimated cost to date is £76,000.
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result a the market testing programme.
The purpose of the market testing programme is to test by competition the value for money represented by the present arrangements for undertaking non-core activities and thus to identify and introduce more effective arrangements. We have made no estimate of likely savings because no pre-emptive judgment has been made of the relative efficiency of the present arrangements.
Northern Ireland
Cardiac Surgery
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will list in tabular form the number of patients sent for cardiac surgery by the several health and social service boards to hospitals outwith Northern Ireland in the latest year for which figures are available.
The figures for 1991–92 and the current year to date are as follows:
Year
| Northern
| Southern
| Eastern
| Western
|
| 1991–92 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 24 |
| 1992–93 | 4 | 3 | 7 | nil |
Equal Opportunities
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many and what percentage of officers in grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 respectively, and overall in his Department are women.
The information requested is as follows:
| Northern Ireland Civil Service (1) | Home Civil Service (2) | |||
| Grade | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage |
| 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 3 | 1 | 2.4 | 0 | — |
| 4 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| 5 | 14 | 7.4 | 0 | — |
| 6 | 60 | 17.2 | 0 | — |
| 7 | 81 | 9.7 | 4 | 20 |
| OVERALL | 12,661 | 43 | 106 | 50 |
Notes: 1. As at 1 January 1992.
2. As at 1 June 1992.
Wild Birds
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what is target for special protection area designation under the EC directive on the conservation of wild birds during 1992.
Two. These are Swan island, Larne lough, Co. Antrim, which was designated on 10 March 1992 and Sheep island off the north Antrim coast, which will be designated later this year.
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many staff in his Department and of what grades are engaged (a) full time and (b) part time, in preparing designations of special protection areas under the EC directive on the conservation of wild birds.
While there are no staff engaged full time in preparing designations of special protection areas, a portion of time is spent by the following on this work:
| Grade | Number of individuals |
| Senior Principal Scientific Officer | 1 |
| Principal Scientific Officer | 1 |
| Senior Scientific Officer | 2 |
| Higher Scientific Officer | 1 |
| Scientific Officer | 4 |
| Principal Officer | 1 |
| Deputy Principal | 1 |
| Staff Officer | 1 |
| Executive Officer I | 1 |
| Executive Officer II | 1 |
| Administrative Assistant | 1 |
| Board | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | 1984–85 | 1985–86 | 1986–87 | 1987–88 | 1988–89 | 1989–90 | 1990–91 | 1991–92 |
| Belfast | 675 | 675 | 675 | 675 | 675 | 675 | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 |
| Western | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
| North-Eastern | 725 | 725 | 725 | 725 | 725 | 725 | 725 | 725 | 725 | 725 |
| South-Eastern | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 475 | 475 | 475 | 475 |
| Southern | 525 | 525 | 525 | 525 | 525 | 525 | 525 | 525 | 525 | 525 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will provide additional funding for education and library boards to increase provision of nursery school places in Northern Ireland to the same level as nursery provision in England.
Government recognise the value of nursery education but limitations on resources for school building, and the need to give priority to provision for children of compulsory school age, have meant that only limited expansion of nursery provision has been possible in recent years. I can offer no immediate prospect of change.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
As promised in the White Paper "Competing for Quality" departmental targets for market testing in 1992–93 will be announced later in the year.
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
Information on the total cost of the initiative is not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
No such estimate has been made
Cyclists (Helmets)
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what plans he has to make the wearing of helmets compulsory for child cyclists; and if he will make a statement.
None. However, it is Government policy to encourage all cyclists to wear helmets and the Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland's ongoing programme of promoting cycle training for primary school children is designed to raise the child's awareness of the potential dangers of cycling on the road and to encourage the wearing of cycle helmets.
Nursery Schools
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many nursery school places were provided by each education and library board in each of the last 10 years.
The full-time equivalent pupil places provided in controlled nursery schools, by each education and library board, were as follows:—
Health And Social Service Boards
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what is the perceived religious affiliation of the executive and non-executive directors of each of the health and social services boards in Northern Ireland.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: Information is available only on the perceived religious affiliation of executive directors which is as follows:
| Health and Social Services Board | Protestant | Roman Catholic | Not Known |
| Eastern | 2 | 3 | — |
| Northern | 5 | — | 1 |
| Southern | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Western | 1 | 2 | 1 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what is the perceived religious affiliation of persons working in each of the health and social services hoard planning sections in Northern Ireland by grade.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: The perceived religious affiliation of persons working in each of the health and social services boards planning section is as follows:
| Health and Social Services Board | Protestant | Roman Catholic | Not Known |
| Eastern | 11 | 16 | 5 |
| Northern | 16 | 4 | 1 |
| Southern | 4 | 7 | — |
| Western | 4 | 4 | — |
Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs
United Nations
6.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what submissions have been made by Her Majesty's Government to the United Nations Secretary-General following the Security Council's summit initiative of 31 January.
The Secretary-General's report on peacemaking, peacekeeping, and preventive diplomacy which was commissioned by the Security Council summit of 31 January is now available. A copy has been placed in the Library of the House. The 12 member states of the European Community submitted a paper on preventive diplomacy as their contribution to the Secretary-General's work.
Punjab And Kashmir
19.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent representations he has made to the Government of India about human rights in Punjab and Kashmir.
Both bilaterally and with our European Community partners we have raised our concerns about human rights with the Indian Government on some 17 occasions over the last 12 months. I raised this with the Indian High Commissioner in May, and our High Commissioner did so with the Indian Home Affairs Minister in New Delhi in early June.
38.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations the British Government have made to the Indian Government on the question of self-determination for Kashmir.
We take every opportunity of impressing on the Government of India the need for a political process in Kashmir, which will allow the aspirations of its population to be expressed.
30.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what are the relations between the British Government and the Government of Azad Kashmir.
We maintain working contacts with the authorities of Azad Kashmir, as with the authorities of Jammu and Kashmir.
South Africa
20.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what contact he has had with the parties to the Conference for a Democratic South Africa talks in South Africa.
As I indicated earlier, we maintain a close dialogue with all the parties in South Africa.
40.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what plans he has to meet representatives of the African National Congress to discuss the situation in South Africa.
My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister has already been in contact with both Mr. Mandela and President de Klerk. My right hon. and noble Friend Baroness Chalker of Wallasey saw Mr. Walter Sisulu. deputy president of the ANC on 26 June, and Mr. Frank Mdlalose, chairman of Inkatha Freedom party on 19 June.
23.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on Her Majesty's Government's policy towards the Republic of South Africa in the light of the Conference for a Democratic South Africa.
Before the negotiations were suspended CODESA had achieved remarkable progress in agreement on transforming South Africa into a non-racial democratic society. We are deeply concerned about the recent escalation of violence and the tragic loss of life at Boipatong.We note the South African Government's determination to bring to justice those responsible. We believe that the interests of the majority of South Africans are best served by concerted efforts to get negotiations back on track as soon as possible. The South African Government's enormous strides towards representative democracy and considerable progress already achieved at CODESA show that negotiations work.
Nato Information Budget
21.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the level of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation information budget for the current year; and if he will make a statement.
The NATO information budget for this year is about £3 million, to which the United Kingdom will contribute about £570,000.The information budget pays for programmes which complement NATO members' national efforts to explain defence policy, and for programmes to spread NATO's message of dialogue, co-operation and collective security in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.
European Community
22.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he next intends to meet the President of the European Commission to discuss developments in the European Community.
I met the President of the Commission and other Commissioners this morning to discuss the programme for the United Kingdom presidency of the Community. There will be further meetings from time to time.
Middle East
24.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he last met the ambassador of Israel to discuss the middle east peace process.
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs last met the Israeli ambassador in February; we are in frequent contact with the Israeli Government at ministerial level to discuss the peace process.
Japan
25.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how he intends to strengthen the European Community's relations with Japan during the United Kingdom presidency.
We shall be looking to strengthen economic, political and technical co-operation with Japan, building on the 1991 EC-Japan joint declaration. This will be an important theme of the meeting which my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister and the President of the Commission will have with the Japanese Prime Minister in London on 4 July.
29.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether he plans to meet the Prime Minister of Japan to discuss avenues for mutual co-operation.
My right hon. Friends the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary will meet the Prime Minister of Japan in London on the morning of 4 July at the EC-Japan summit. This will be followed by bilateral talks between the British and Japanese Prime Ministers. We intend to use the opportunity to develop further our already close bilateral relationship with Japan and to strengthen co-operation between the EC and Japan.
Cyprus
26.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will encourage the United Nations to help maintain the archaeological heritage located in the north of Cyprus.
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs has no plans to do so.
Ec Presidency
27.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what are the principal objectives of the United Kingdom's presidency of the European Council.
The United Kingdom aims to run an efficient presidency. We shall pursue discussions on the ratification of the Maastricht treaty. Key themes will include the completion of the single market, the future financing negotiations, the successful conclusion of the GATT Uruguay round and developing relations with central and eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.
37.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will outline the objectives of the forthcoming United Kingdom presidency of the European Community.
The United Kingdom aims to run an efficient presidency. We will pursue discussions on the ratification of the Maastricht treaty. Key themes will include the completion of the single market, the future financing negotiations, preparations for enlargement negotiations, the successful conclusion of the GATT Uruguay round and developing relations with central and eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.
Nuclear Material
28.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will outline the steps and initiatives he has taken to ensure redundant nuclear bomb-making material is properly stored, guarded and accounted for in eastern bloc countries.
The security of fissile material from ex-Soviet nuclear weapons is the responsibility of the Russian Government. However, we and our NATO allies have made clear that we are ready to help in various aspects of eliminating surplus nuclear weapons in the former Soviet Union. As part of a wider programme of assistance, the United Kingdom has offered to advise on the safe handling, storage and conversion of fissile material. We also continue to emphasise the importance we attach to early accession to the non-proliferation treaty and application of IAEA safeguards to nuclear materials by all non-Russian republics.
Subsidiarity
31.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what consultations he has held concerning the definition of subsidiarity in the context of the Maastricht agreement; and if he will make a statement.
I refer the hon. Member to the conclusions of the meeting of the European Council held at Lisbon on 26 and 27 June, copies of which have been deposited in the Library of the House.
Committee Of The Regions
32.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions he has held on the proposed EC committee of the regions.
The committee of the regions cannot be established before the entry into force of the treaty on European union. The Government are considering the nomination of the 24 United Kingdom members.
Guyana
33.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps are being taken to monitor the forthcoming elections in Guyana.
The Guyanese Government have invited the Carter centre and Commonwealth secretariat to send observer teams to monitor the forthcoming general election. Diplomats accredited to Guyana will also be permitted access to all stages of the electoral process.
Angola
34.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assistance Her Majesty's Government are giving to aid the electoral processes in Angola.
We are providing bilateral assistance totalling £270,000 in support of the United Nations development programme's special project of assistance to the electoral process in Angola.
Hong Kong
35.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he next intends to visit Hong Kong to discuss the future of the colony.
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs hopes to visit Hong Kong again fairly soon.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what was the total number of people in Hong Kong eligible to register to vote at the recent election; and what was the percentage of those eligible to register to vote who did vote for each of the parties and groups standing for election.
[holding answer 30 June 1992.]: The total number of people in Hong Kong eligible to vote in the Legislative Council elections of September 1991 was 3.7 million, of whom 1.9 million registered. The turnout for the 18 directly elected seats was 39 per cent. of those registered to vote. The votes were distributed between the parties as follows:
| Per cent. | |
| United Democrats | 45.14 |
| Meeting Point | 7.20 |
| Liberal Democratic Federation | 5.09 |
| Association for Democracy and Peoples Livelihood | 4.44 |
| Federation of Trade Unions | 3.28 |
| Hong Kong Citizen Forum | 2.18 |
| Kwun Tong Man Chung Friendship Promotion Association | 1.55 |
| Hong Kong Democratic Foundation | 1.44 |
| New Hong Kong Alliance | 0.87 |
| Independent Liberal Candidates | 9.35 |
| Other Groups and Independent Candidates | 19.43 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when the Public Security Bureau of China was invited to have an official presence in Hong Kong; what are the remit and jurisdictions of the Public Security Bureau in Hong Kong; how many staff are employed in the Hong Kong office of the Public Security Bureau; to whom they are accountable within the Government of Hong Kong; what access the Public Security Bureau will have to information held by the Hong Kong police; and if he will make a statement.
An agreement between the Royal Hong Kong Police (RHKP) and the Chinese Ministry of Public Security (PSB) to send one to three liaison officers to Hong Kong was announced on 9 May 1992. The aim is to enable quicker and more effective co-operation on criminal matters, particularly violent crime and smuggling, which is causing serious public concern in Hong Kong. As with the eight other countries with police liaison officers in Hong Kong, the PSB liaison officers will have no jurisdiction, constabulary powers or operational role. They will have no automatic access to information held by the RHKP.
Malawi
36.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he last met the President of Malawi in order to dicuss progress towards democracy in that country.
My right hon. and noble Friend Baroness Chalker of Wallasey met President Banda of Malawi during a private visit to the United Kingdom on 29 May last year. My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister also met President Banda during the course of his visit.
Switzerland
39.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on United Kingdom relations with Switzerland.
We have excellent relations with the Swiss, who are, not least, important trading partners. We have welcomed Switzerland's application to join the European Community, and during our EC presidency will work towards the opening of formal accession negotiations as soon as possible.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list all the bilateral and multilateral agreements negotiated between the United Kingdom and Switzerland since 1979.
Ten bilateral agreements have been negotiated between the United Kingdom and Switzerland since 1979. In the same period, 136 multilateral agreements were signed or accepted by the United Kingdom and Switzerland or accepted by the United Kingdom on behalf of dependent territories.Copies of computer printouts giving basic details of the agreements have been placed in the Library of the House.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to his answer of 24 June, Official Report, columns 208–9, what information he has on bilateral and multilateral agreements between the United Kingdom and Switzerland.
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has records of 123 bilateral agreements with Switzerland since the early 1800s. There are also records of well over 2,000 multilateral agreements to which the United Kingdom is a party. All would need to be checked to ascertain Swiss involvement. This could not be done except at disproportionate cost.
Croatia
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on relations with Croatia.
We established diplomatic relations with the Republic of Croatia on 24 June and hope to name the first British ambassador at Zagreb shortly.
Israel
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on United Kingdom relations with Israel.
We look forward to cooperating with the new Israeli Government when it is formed. There are important new opportunities in the peace process and we shall of course encourage Israel to make the best of these.
Lebanese Hostages
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent representations he has made to the Israeli Government about the Lebanese hostages, including Sheikh Obeid, held without trial and contrary to United Nations resolutions; and if he will initiate action to obtain their release.
We welcomed the release of the last western hostages. Although that particular episode is closed, we shall continue to call for the release of all those held outside the due process of law. We hope that we shall also see an accounting for those hostages who have died while in captivity.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
No such estimate has been made.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
The cost of the market testing initiative since November 1991 has been £10,600 in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and £15,000 in the Overseas Development Administration. These figures do not include staff costs incurred so far. I intend, however, to monitor the full costs, including staff costs, of implementing the market testing programme.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to the hon. Member for Dundee, East (Mr. McAllion) on 16 June 1992, Official Report, col. 491.
Mozambique
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what contact or communication he or his officials have had with representatives of RENAMO.
United Kingdom officials have contact with RENAMO through the forum of the joint verification commission in Maputo, of which we are members, and in our capacity as observers at the Rome peace talks. In March we began contact with RENAMO leader, Dhlakama, at senior official level in recognition of a more positive attitude by RENAMO to the peace talks in Rome, which we hope will continue. There will be no Ministerial contact with RENAMO until the negotiations have advanced considerably.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations the Government have made since 1979 to the Mozambican Government about the abuse of human rights in the parts of Mozambique under its control.
There continue to be human rights abuses in Mozambique. We have discussed human rights with the Government of Mozambique on several occasions since 1979 notably when my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs raised the matter with President Chissano during his visit to Mozambique in October 1991. We have also raised RENAMO's human rights record with RENAMO.
Lord President Of The Council
Disabled Employees
To ask the Lord President of the Council how many and what percentage of officers in grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 respectively, and overall in his Office are registered disabled people.
I refer the hon. and learned Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Paisley, South (Mr. McMaster) on 4 June at column 638.
Market Testing
To ask the Lord President of the Council (1) if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available;(2) what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in his Department since November 1991;(3) what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to the hon. Member for Birmingham, Hodge Hill (Mr. Davis) on 29 June at column 366.
Social Security
Cold Weather Payments
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many households in the Manchester, Wythenshawe constituency qualify for payments under the cold weather payments scheme.
The administration of the social fund is a matter for Mr. Michael Bichard, the chief executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member with such information as is available and copies will be placed in the Library and the Public Information Office.
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) on what dates and in what parts of the Manchester, Wythenshawe constituency the cold weather payments system was triggered during the winter of 1991–92; and how many households received payments on each occasion;(2) on what dates cold weather payments were made in the Manchester, Wythenshawe constituency in response to a forecast of a qualifying period: and what were the periods taken for payments to be made once the system had been triggered.
Such information as is available is in the Library.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what has been the total cost so far of the market testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
The total cost of the market testing initiative in the Department since November 1991 is estimated as some £215,000.
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market testing programme.
No estimate of the savings has been made.
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster to my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridgeshire, South-East (Mr. Paice) on 22 June 1992 at column 102.
Social Fund
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what was the total amount in allocated social fund budgets which was unspent by local DSS offices in each year of its operation expressed in (a) cash terms, (b) cash terms at 1990–91 prices and (c) as a percentage of the gross social fund budget; if he will list the number of local DSS offices involved; and if he will provide a breakdown by (i) region and (ii) local DSS office.
[holding answer 17 June 1992]: Information expressed in 1990–91 prices is in the tables. Real term figures have been calculated using the current GDP deflater and may alter. The balance of information requested is in the Library.
| Unspent budget allocations March 19891 | |
| Total (1990–91 prices) | |
| London North | |
| Acton | 6,306.29 |
| Aylesbury | 80,590.18 |
| Banbury | 14,753.09 |
| Barking | 219,102.32 |
| Barnet | 15,940.20 |
| Basildon | 215,837.58 |
| Bedford | 131,395.48 |
| Braintree | 88,666.25 |
| Bury St. Edmunds | 65,785.69 |
| Cambridge | 82,201.89 |
| Chelmsford | 74,383.52 |
| Clacton-on-sea | 50,441.81 |
| Colchester | 28,300.55 |
| Cricklewood | 90,110.61 |
| Diss | 32,640.34 |
| Dunstable | 78,642.68 |
| Edgware | 48,362.54 |
| Euston | 144,121.49 |
| Finsbury Park | 282,621.88 |
| Grays | 18,661.49 |
| Great Yarmouth | 4,274.77 |
| Hackney | 360,632.04 |
| Harlow | 80,615.06 |
| Harrow | 116,578.60 |
| Hemel Hempstead | 88,373.29 |
| Hertford | 15,590.48 |
| High Wycombe | 110,389.87 |
| Hoxton | 152,035.05 |
| Ilford | 260,556.06 |
| Ipswich | 17,033.91 |
| King's Lynn | 70,722.93 |
| London, Plaistow | 130,560.60 |
| London, Canning Town | 82,543.50 |
| London, Ealing | 36,436.88 |
| London, Edmonton | 68,083.68 |
| London, Harlesden | 301,049.73 |
| London, Hendon | 72,822.98 |
| London, Highgate | 97,713.47 |
| London, Leytonstone | 198,533.79 |
| London, Notting Hill | 88,440.82 |
| London, Paddington | 13,989.45 |
| London, Poplar | 89,898.43 |
| London, Stoke Newington | 126,653.96 |
| London, Tottenham | 99,221.48 |
| London, Woodgrange Park | 233,778.29 |
| London, Wood Green | 13,958.58 |
| Lowestoft | 27,066.17 |
| Luton | 112,648.46 |
| Milton Keynes | 103,030.33 |
| Neasden | 384,270.02 |
| Norwich Chantry | 111,822.03 |
| Norwich Mountergate | 156,155.75 |
| Oxford | 306,933.37 |
| Peterborough | 229,241.08 |
| Romford | 48,101.96 |
| Shoreditch | 34,722.72 |
| Southall | 155,898.26 |
| Southend on Sea | 49,868.28 |
| St, Albans | 16.096.90 |
| Stepney | 431.48 |
| Stevenage | 89,179.70 |
| Thames North | 10,381.90 |
| Uxbridge | 50,121.20 |
| Walthamstow | 37,396.82 |
| Watford | 44,697.42 |
| Total | 6,667,417.45 |
| Percentage of Gross Expenditure | 2.88 |
| Unspent budget allocations March 19891 | |
| Total (1990–91 prices) | |
| London South | |
| Aldershot | 141,830.87 |
| Andover | 15,421.22 |
| Ashford | 16,469.04 |
| Basingstoke | 55,412.83 |
| Bexley | 57,140.72 |
| Bloomsbury | 121,860.74 |
| Bognor Regis | 60.076.41 |
| Bracknell | 77,711.06 |
| Brighton | 3,151.27 |
| Bromley | 69,109.22 |
| Canterbury | 1,931.48 |
| Chatham | 104,381.80 |
| Chichester | 45,589.28 |
| Crawley | 58,581.04 |
| Croydon | 131,748.94 |
| Dartford | 23,097.25 |
| Dover | 56,839.72 |
| Eastbourne | 165,710.72 |
| Eltham | 19,622.88 |
| Epsom | 57,275.22 |
| Fareham | 64,768.42 |
| Folkestone | 47,312.06 |
| Gravesend | 34,721.81 |
| Greenwich Park | 326,155.96 |
| Guildford | 79,382.01 |
| Hastings | 44,905.66 |
| Havant | 91,164.18 |
| Hither Green | 86,737.56 |
| Hounslow | 180,097.95 |
| Hove | 93,615.35 |
| Isle of Wight | 83,272.76 |
| Kingston | 104,499.83 |
| Lewes | 64,394.47 |
| London City | 65,292.47 |
| London Woolwich | 179,412.11 |
| London Balham | 131,866.88 |
| London Battersea | 112,596.36 |
| London Brixton | 211,860.73 |
| London Camberwell | 234,640.59 |
| London Chelsea | 128,886.37 |
| London Crystal Palace | 234,011.38 |
| London Kennington Park | 43.699.96 |
| London Kensington | 70.089.03 |
| London Lewisham | 446.414.86 |
| London Oval | 214,853.58 |
| London Peckham | 133,643.42 |
| London Southwark | 158,754.13 |
| London Streatham | 265,308.90 |
| London Thames South | 39,998.09 |
| London Wandsworth | 146,407.73 |
| London Westminster | 87,316.77 |
| London Wimbledon | 124,869.75 |
| Maidstone | 60,051.80 |
| Mitcham | 4,241.53 |
| New Forest | 97,570.38 |
| New Malden | 58,082.10 |
| Newbury | 65,290.34 |
| Orpington | 44,718.35 |
| Portsmouth North | 7,595.25 |
| Portsmouth South | 893.73 |
| Reading | 326,265.35 |
| Redhill | 78,231.33 |
| Rochester | 60,866.19 |
| Sittingbourne | 95,097.99 |
| Slough | 91,250.60 |
| Southampton | 245,951.58 |
| Sutton | 47,968.82 |
| Thanet | 6,969.10 |
| Tunbridge Wells | 52,376.03 |
| Twickenham | 69,948.49 |
| Winchester | 54,172.39 |
| Woking | 82,220.70 |
| Worthing | 105,393.91 |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
| Total | 7,269,068.81 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 3.14 |
Unspent Budget allocations March 1989 1
| |
Total (90–91 prices)
| |
| MIDLANDS | |
| Birmingham Bradford Street | 162,392.26 |
| Birmingham Edgbaston | 75,457.63 |
| Birmingham Erdington | 56,152.10 |
| Birmingham Handsworth | 187,775.74 |
| Birmingham Ladywood | 260.16 |
| Birmingham Northfield | 15,753.36 |
| Birmingham Perry Barr | 99,199.34 |
| Birmingham Ravenhurst | 43,317.40 |
| Birmingham South Yardley | 53,261.19 |
| Birmingham Sparkhill | 67,418.40 |
| Birmingham Washwood Heath | 112,287.96 |
| Boston | 71,245.04 |
| Burton on Trent | 1,828.43 |
| Cannock | 95,927.63 |
| Chesterfield | 36,114.61 |
| Corby | 54,398.57 |
| Coventry East | 187,399.11 |
| Coventry West | 235,568.39 |
| Derby Beckct Street | 16,140.55 |
| Derby Heritage Gate | 38,704.18 |
| Derby London Road | 64,569.55 |
| Dudley North | 124,267.56 |
| Dudley South | 90,654.75 |
| Grantham | 76,780.33 |
| Hereford | 79,945.30 |
| Ilkeston | 58,496.14 |
| Kidderminster | 117,144.74 |
| Leamington Spa | 34,343.01 |
| Leicester Burleys Way | 71,394.24 |
| Leicester Lower Hill Street | 80,058.20 |
| Leicester Norton Street | 238,839.90 |
| Leicester Yeoman Street | 263,214.72 |
| Lichfield | 200,457.85 |
| Lincoln Newland | 60,348.73 |
| Lincoln Orchard Street | 61,459.63 |
| Loughborough | 87,113.24 |
| Mansfield | 106,868.35 |
| Newcastle (Staffordshire) | 94,425.05 |
| Northampton | 218,005.95 |
| Nottingham, Castlegate | 9,943.62 |
| Nottingham. David Lane | 22,071.93 |
| Nottingham, Shakespeare Street | 55,789.51 |
| Nottingham. Station Street | 26,175.93 |
| Nuneaton | 95,172. 27 |
| Redditch | 58,031.38 |
| Rugby. | 54,354.43 |
| Shrewsbury | 155,443.85 |
| Skegness | 17,005.20 |
| Smethwick | 251,426.45 |
| Stafford | 48,703.34 |
| Stoke on Trent, North | 17,391.60 |
| Stoke on Trent, South | 15,801.54 |
| Sutton in Ashfield | 40,761.79 |
| Telford | 129,292.79 |
| Walsall, East | 27,267.73 |
| Walsall. West | 63,667.77 |
| Wellingborough | 183,950.35 |
| West Bromwich | 155,781.09 |
| Wolverhampton, North | 173,721.73 |
| Wolverhampton, South | 203,932.31 |
| Worcester | 65,031.56 |
| Worksop | 59,759.94 |
| Total | 5,669,467.36 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 2.45 |
Unspent budget allocations March 1989 1
| |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
North East
| |
| Ashington | 37,618.36 |
| Barnsley East | 161,184.59 |
| Barnsley West | 219,795.31 |
| Berwick-upon-Tweed | 818.33 |
| Bishop Auckland | 155,397.65 |
| Blyth | 28,403.39 |
| Bradford East | 13,376.96 |
| Bradford South | 80,353.97 |
| Bradford West | 106,011.16 |
| Bridlington | 25,979.76 |
| Castleford | 32,272.34 |
| Chester le Street | 31,466.07 |
| Darlington | 257,074.16 |
| Dewsbury | 51,973.37 |
| Doncaster East | 0.00 |
| Doncaster West | 199,368.84 |
| Durham | 42,663.63 |
| Eston | 78,236.66 |
| Gateshead | 125,795.01 |
| Goole | 27,776.20 |
| Grimsby | 190,962.62 |
| Halifax | 4,639.20 |
| Harrogate | 130,845.93 |
| Hartlepool | 81,652.39 |
| Hemsworth | 30,387.48 |
| Hexham | 28,960.29 |
| Houghton le Spring | 32,416.35 |
| Huddersfield | 72,282.12 |
| Hull East | 13,235.29 |
| Hull West | 57,684.01 |
| Jarrow | 134,608.70 |
| Keighley | 293.31 |
| Leeds East | 38,203.56 |
| Leeds North | 141,042.95 |
| Leeds North West | 35,520.31 |
| Leeds South | 27,543.17 |
| Leeds West | 87,635.54 |
| Middlesbrough | 93,022.51 |
| Newcastle East | 72,955.10 |
| Newcastle St, James | 80,191.49 |
| Newcastle West | 41,946.71 |
| North Shields | 93,016.47 |
| Northallerton | 42,404.69 |
| Peterlee | 1,101.56 |
| Pontefract | 11,336.86 |
| Redcar | 14,007.31 |
| Rotherham North | 14,490.57 |
| Rotherham South | 7,741.53 |
| Scarborough | 48,025.73 |
| Scunthorpe | 100,572.64 |
| Seaham | 63.23 |
| Sheffield North East | 263,441.84 |
| Sheffield North West | 156,827.09 |
| Sheffield South East | 37,752.02 |
| Sheffield South West | 263,230.45 |
| Skipton | 13,009.69 |
| South Shields | 18,727.67 |
| Stanley | 55,570.63 |
| Stockton | 8,990.73 |
| Sunderland North | 293,984.87 |
| Sunderland South | 125,092.99 |
| Wakefield | 4,490.30 |
| Wallsend | 58,114.23 |
| Wath on Dearne | 99,577.23 |
| York | 25,067.05 |
| Total | 4,828,232.14 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 2.08 |
Unspent budget allocations March 1989
| |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
North West
| |
| Accrington | 96,496.92 |
| Ashton-under-Lyne | 17,192.01 |
| Barrow in Furness | 8,380.65 |
| Birkenhead North | 39,540.92 |
| Birkenhead South | 17,755.27 |
| Blackburn | 82,642.80 |
| Blackpool North | 39,991.21 |
| Blackpool South | 71,049.35 |
| Bolton | 144,093.39 |
| Burnley | 105,496.24 |
| Bury | 237,268.30 |
| Buxton | 6,970.04 |
| Carlisle | 16,589.48 |
| Chester | 51,936.89 |
| Crewe | 50,962.48 |
| Ellesmere Port | 85,301.84 |
| Farnworth | 40,471.73 |
| Hyde | 121,494.40 |
| Kendal | 32,732.06 |
| Lancaster | 82,652.03 |
| Leigh | 38,342.41 |
| Liverpool City | 95,731.89 |
| Liverpool Bootle | 223,251.10 |
| Liverpool Breckfield | 114,805.53 |
| Liverpool Crosby | 51,411.49 |
| Liverpool Edgehill | 95,228.61 |
| Liverpool Garston | 68,475.13 |
| Liverpool Huyton | 133,406.71 |
| Liverpool Kirkby | 219,063.10 |
| Liverpool Norris Green | 86,339.71 |
| Liverpool Toxteth | 283,089.90 |
| Liverpool West Derby | 23,299.57 |
| Liverpool Belle Vale | 30,644.62 |
| Macclesfield | 34,946.82 |
| Manchester Cheetham | 7,064.76 |
| Manchester Middleton | 50,060.27 |
| Manchester Sale | 28,026.29 |
| Manchester Central | 4,610.57 |
| Manchester Chorlton | 27,600.87 |
| Manchester Failsworth | 68,012.48 |
| Manchester Longsight | 83,596.34 |
| Manchester Openshaw | 63,071.84 |
| Manchester Rusholme | 102,663.05 |
| Manchester Wythenshawe | 60,559.14 |
| Northwich | 85,852.71 |
| Oldham | 8,358.16 |
| Penrith | 11,712.63 |
| Preston North | 44,668.85 |
| Preston South | 42,095.03 |
| Rochdale | 56,118.68 |
| Rossendale | 26,214.30 |
| Salford North | 1,145.62 |
| Salford South | 4,988.05 |
| Skelmersdale | 87,125.53 |
| Southport | 99,402.68 |
| St, Helens | 153,644.24 |
| Stockport North | 86,104.58 |
| Stockport South | 91,359.80 |
| Wallasey | 125,265.79 |
| Warrington | 189,997.30 |
| Whitehaven | 7,472.23 |
| Widnes | 91,753.32 |
| Wigan | 3,691.99 |
| Wilmslow | 7,293.44 |
| Workington | 24,937.17 |
| Total | 4,591,522.26 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 1.98 |
Unspent budget allocations March 1989 1
| |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
Scotland
| |
| Aberdeen North | 45,855.42 |
| Aberdeen South | 84,118.30 |
| Airdrie | 214,078.65 |
| Arbroath | 7,396.19 |
| Ayr | 324,067.42 |
| Bathgate | 163,635.15 |
| Bellshill | 212,547.06 |
| Campbeltown | 5,928.41 |
| Clydebank | 198,311.14 |
| Coatbridge | 184,215.93 |
| Cowdenbeath | 484.81 |
| Cumbernauld | 141,383.08 |
| Dumbarton | 146,653.49 |
| Dumfries | 46,500.19 |
| Dundee East | 61,905.22 |
| Dundee West | 60,615.12 |
| Dunfermline | 44,388.74 |
| East Kilbride | 150,950.31 |
| Edinburgh East | 33,549.20 |
| Edinburgh City | 118,248.50 |
| Edinburgh North | 77,449.01 |
| Edinburgh South | 140,413.71 |
| Edinburgh West | 98,371.04 |
| Elgin | 52,931.68 |
| Falkirk | 299,868.39 |
| Fort William | 7,941.85 |
| Galashiels | 12,087.94 |
| Glasgow Anniesland | 258,666.67 |
| Glasgow Bridgeton | 11,807.89 |
| Glasgow City | 327,002.88 |
| Glasgow Craigton | 251,561.87 |
| Glasgow Cranstonhill | 41,461.25 |
| Glasgow Laurieston | 428,839.28 |
| Glasgow Maryhill | 392,656.97 |
| Glasgow Partick | 107,441.01 |
| Glasgow Provan | 10,701.95 |
| Glasgow Rutherglen | 302,137.42 |
| Glasgow Shettleston | 549,290.93 |
| Glasgow South-side | 202,166.36 |
| Glasgow Springburn | 367,953.94 |
| Greenock | 381,083.17 |
| Hamilton | 639,278.12 |
| Inverness | 36,778.53 |
| Irvine | 264,014.54 |
| Johnstone | 72,842.06 |
| Kilmarnock | 207,725.57 |
| Kirkcaldy | 112,260.38 |
| Lerwick | 8,644.25 |
| Leven | 41,599.61 |
| Motherwell | 218,426.97 |
| Oban | 32,447.83 |
| Paisley | 310,395.01 |
| Perth | 46,887.07 |
| Peterhead | 6,420.68 |
| Port Glasgow | 226,471.03 |
| Stirling | 87,660.41 |
| Stornoway | 7,514.19 |
| Stranraer | 5,208.74 |
| Wick | 26,891.94 |
| Total | 8,918,134.49 |
| Percentage of Gross Expenditure | 3.85 |
Unspent budget allocations March 1989 1
| |
Wales and SW
| Total (1990–91 prices)
|
| Aberdare | 3,874.61 |
| Abertillery | 18,139.98 |
| Aberystwyth | 29,184.36 |
| Ammanford | 3,211.44 |
| Anglesey | 49,220.68 |
| Bargoed | 54,746.60 |
Wales and SW
| Total (1990–91 prices)
|
| Barnstaple | 45,793.72 |
| Barry | 28,961.90 |
| Bath | 94,849.17 |
| Blackwood | 37,512.64 |
| Bournemouth | 84,050.46 |
| Bridgend | 7,473.76 |
| Bridgwater | 45,220.42 |
| Bristol Central | 49,781.01 |
| Bristol East | 57,945.61 |
| Bristol Horfield | 49,689.81 |
| Bristol South | 84,518.20 |
| Bristol West | 33,488.62 |
| Caernarfon | 4,328.37 |
| Caerphilly | 23,039.75 |
| Cardiff Central | 14,789.98 |
| Cardiff East | 25,899.38 |
| Cardiff West | 6,773.73 |
| Carmarthen | 1,686.90 |
| Cheltenham | 56,556.94 |
| Chippenham | 412.99 |
| Colwyn Bay | 55,835.97 |
| Cymbran | 70,928.53 |
| Deeside | 144.38 |
| Ebbw Vale | 54,208.68 |
| Exeter | 88,499.28 |
| Gloucester | 989,829.26 |
| Haverfordwest | 17,040.91 |
| Launceston | 41,026.78 |
| Llanelli | 57,361.45 |
| Merthyr Tydfil | 71,325.15 |
| Morriston | 27,039.94 |
| Neath | 26,532.93 |
| Newport Gwent | 25,016.66 |
| Newtown | 38,865.14 |
| Pembroke Dock | 3,079.09 |
| Penzance | 157,064.52 |
| Plymouth | 112,958.30 |
| Plymouth Crownhill | 5,154.75 |
| Pontypridd | 3,001.50 |
| Poole | 135,552.50 |
| Port Talbot | 466.17 |
| Porth | 22,258.35 |
| Porthmadog | 30,715.94 |
| Rhyl | 5,203.17 |
| Salisbury | 3,576.33 |
| St, Austell | 82,298.44 |
| Stroud | 37,938.85 |
| Swansea | 0.00 |
| Swindon | 21,725.94 |
| Taunton | 105,840.59 |
| Tonypandy | 43,664.01 |
| Torbay | 281,194.59 |
| Trowbridge | 3,643.86 |
| Truro | 93,520.77 |
| Weston-Super-Mare | 33,367.49 |
| Weymouth | 52,272.21 |
| Wrexham | 82,275.93 |
| Yeovil | 24,593.25 |
| Total | 3,816,172.65 |
| Percentage of Gross Expenditure | 1.65 |
| Grand Total | 29,027,827.46 |
| Percentage of Gross Expenditure | 12.52 |
Note: Percentages may not sum due to rounding.
Unspent budget allocations March 1990 1
| |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
London North
| |
| Acton | 28,439.12 |
| Aylesbury | 17,889.19 |
| Banbury | 1,756.57 |
| Barking | 15,324.56 |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
| Barnet | 8,058.75 |
| Basildon | 83,143.63 |
| Bedford | 16,838.47 |
| Braintree | 1,098.99 |
| Bury St, Edmunds | 7,555.72 |
| Cambridge | 38,185.48 |
| Chelmsford | 0.00 |
| Clacton-on-Sea | 1,362.72 |
| Colchester | 433.85 |
| Cricklewood | 24,133.37 |
| Diss | 10,666.45 |
| Dunstable | 25,288.92 |
| Edgware | 49.63 |
| Euston | 0.00 |
| Finsbury Park | 12,276.56 |
| Grays | 17,164.75 |
| Great Yarmouth | 85.33 |
| Hackney | 70,321.00 |
| Harlow | 39,742.27 |
| Harrow | 29,298.29 |
| Hemel Hempstead | 55,333.27 |
| Hertford | 5,109.39 |
| High Wycombe | 15,517.98 |
| Hoxton | 2,416.57 |
| Ilford | 41,481.74 |
| Ipswich | 1.45 |
| King's Lynn | 431.48 |
| London Plaistow | 319.73 |
| London Canning Town | 332.61 |
| London Ealing | 8,210.35 |
| London Edmonton | 161.34 |
| London Harlesden | 33,808.55 |
| London Hendon | 5,650.20 |
| London Highgate | 302.04 |
| London Leytonstone | 26,608.76 |
| London Notting Hill | 5,971.81 |
| London Paddington | 20,422.16 |
| London Poplar | 15,120.34 |
| London Stoke Newington | 5,700.64 |
| London Tottenham | 48,932.04 |
| London Woodgrange Park | 21.90 |
| London Wood Green | 85.36 |
| Lowestoft | 16,882.58 |
| Luton | 9,143.76 |
| Milton Keynes | 3,781.56 |
| Neasden | 12,634.85 |
| Norwich Chantry | 14,174.75 |
| Norwich Mountergate | 54,837.25 |
| Oxford | 39,040.15 |
| Peterborough | 1,169.06 |
| Romford | 42.97 |
| St, Albans | 5,593.43 |
| Shoreditch | 1,568.47 |
| Southall | 4,799.06 |
| Southend on Sea | 1,557.60 |
| Stepney | 4,871.05 |
| Stevenage | 846.99 |
| Thames North | 4,186.74 |
| Uxbridge | 302.04 |
| Walthamstow | 724.13 |
| Watford | 4,643.37 |
| Total | 921,853.15 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 0.36 |
Unspent budget allocations March 1990 1
| |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
London South
| |
| Aldershot | 84,443.85 |
| Andover | 1,018.93 |
| Ashford | 6,032.86 |
| Basingstoke | 11,449.36 |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
| Bexley | 65,887.98 |
| Bloomsbury | 59,650.21 |
| Bognor Regis | 5,339.02 |
| Bracknell | 8,998.47 |
| Brighton | 5,059.13 |
| Bromley | 3,873.48 |
| Canterbury | 2,636.31 |
| Chatham | 79,726.92 |
| Chichester | 4.86 |
| Crawley | 2,285.44 |
| Croydon | 5,915.00 |
| Dartford | 10,850.06 |
| Dover | 8,791.21 |
| Eastbourne | 50,820.82 |
| Eltham | 0.00 |
| Epsom | 12,056.83 |
| Fareham | 13,209.00 |
| Folkestone | 9,933.17 |
| Gravesend | 2,049.35 |
| Greenwich Park | 22,214.37 |
| Guildford | 28,331.25 |
| Hastings | 18,179.24 |
| Havant | 20,478.88 |
| Hither Green | 0.00 |
| Hounslow | 5,313.57 |
| Hove | 2,665.05 |
| Isle of Wight | 55.60 |
| Kingston | 47,130.77 |
| Lewes | 8,915.93 |
| London City | 16,418.64 |
| London Woolwich | 26,310.01 |
| London Balham | 0.00 |
| London Battersea | 113.25 |
| London Brixton | 79,499.76 |
| London Camberwell | 22,762.94 |
| London Chelsea | 1,579.53 |
| London Crystal Palace | 8,972.36 |
| London Kennington Park | 593.91 |
| London Kensington | 15,612.86 |
| London Lewisham | 25,422.82 |
| London Oval | 0.83 |
| London Peckham | 6,764.11 |
| London Southwark | 1,317.97 |
| London Streatham | 38,937.81 |
| London Thames South | 10,813.31 |
| London Wandsworth | 2.99 |
| London Westminster | 25,161.53 |
| London Wimbledon | 4,859.68 |
| Maidstone | 3.81 |
| Mitcham | 4,731.59 |
| New Forest | 15,918.18 |
| New Malden | 35,089.54 |
| Newbury | 25,403.72 |
| Orpington | 6,886.92 |
| Portsmouth North | 519.53 |
| Portsmouth South | 7.84 |
| Reading | 51,168.66 |
| Redhill | 2,169.57 |
| Sittingbourne | 128.84 |
| Slough | 4,175.39 |
| Southampton | 25,089.93 |
| Sutton | 30.77 |
| Thanet | 1,776.75 |
| Tunbridge Wells | 14,760.11 |
| Twickenham | 31,753.84 |
| Winchester | 21,476.79 |
| Woking | 26,134.11 |
| Worthing | 9,368.22 |
| Total | 1,165,055.32 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 0.45 |
Unspent budget allocations March 1990 1
| |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
Midlands
| |
| Birmingham Bradford St, | 7,668.77 |
| Birmingham Edgbaston | 3,727.60 |
| Birmingham Erdington | 19,842.32 |
| Birmingham Handsworth | 14,568.67 |
| Birmingham Ladywood | 849.77 |
| Birmingham Northfield | 4.52 |
| Birmingham Perry Barr | 10,030.94 |
| Birmingham Ravenhurst | 9,624.62 |
| Birmingham South Yardley | 3,754.46 |
| Birmingham Sparkhill | 5,299.82 |
| Birmingham Washwood Heath | 2,183.10 |
| Boston | 5,477.79 |
| Burton on Trent | 6,231.98 |
| Cannock | 2,965.24 |
| Chesterfield | 129.59 |
| Corby | 18,875.06 |
| Coventry East | 0.70 |
| Coventry West | 63,371.85 |
| Derby Becket St, | 5,874.26 |
| Derby Heritage Gate | 6,992.26 |
| Derby London Road | 12,888.68 |
| Dudley North | 28,031.39 |
| Dudley South | 3,819.52 |
| Grantham | 28,354.91 |
| Hereford | 11,636.83 |
| Ilkeston | 21,498.68 |
| Kidderminster | 8,117.31 |
| Leamington Spa | 103.66 |
| Leicester Burleys Way | 117.99 |
| Leicester Lower Hill St, | 400.64 |
| Leicester Norton St, | 40,900.13 |
| Leicester Yeoman St, | 6,318.32 |
| Lichfield | 56,391.26 |
| Lincoln Newland | 303.88 |
| Lincoln Orchard Street | 11,756.09 |
| Loughborough | 5, 957.47 |
| Mansfield | 848.74 |
| Newcastle (Staffs) | 10,420.46 |
| Northampton | 8,588.92 |
| Nottingham Castlegate | 67.30 |
| Nottingham David Lane | 6,866.31 |
| Nottingham Shakespeare Street | 1,300.50 |
| Nottingham Station Street | 15,783.93 |
| Nuneaton | 37.24 |
| Redditch | 13,705.15 |
| Rugby | 20,353.87 |
| Shrewsbury | 48,019.13 |
| Skegness | 37,401.43 |
| Smethwick | 58,664.09 |
| Stafford | 9,422.72 |
| Stoke on Trent North | 10,160.03 |
| Stoke on Trent South | 3,525.87 |
| Sutton in Ashfield | 6,209.82 |
| Telford | 0.00 |
| Walsall East | 3,343.30 |
| Walsall West | 2,562.54 |
| Wellingborough | 83.02 |
| West Bromwich | 899.90 |
| Wolverhampton North | 64,627.48 |
| Wolverhampton South | 33,716.23 |
| Worcester | 43,062.10 |
| Worksop | 104.64 |
| Total | 823,844.81 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 0.32 |
Unspent budget allocations March 1990 1
| |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
North East
| |
| Ashinglon | 51.58 |
| Barnsley East | 34.24 |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
| Barnsley West | 37,767.27 |
| Berwick on Tweed | 789.19 |
| Bishop Auckland | 727.56 |
| Blyth | 2,485.52 |
| Bradford East | 192.36 |
| Bradford South | 9,751.90 |
| Bradford West | 12,013.26 |
| Bridlington | 9.33 |
| Castleford | 3,496.27 |
| Chester le Street | 711.26 |
| Darlington | 13,182.96 |
| Dewsbury | 6.20 |
| Doncaster East | 15,712.27 |
| Doncaster West | 52,430.51 |
| Durham | 222.22 |
| Eston | 1,222.30 |
| Gateshead | 212.68 |
| Goole | 9,794.40 |
| Grimsby | 23,410.93 |
| Halifax | 0.00 |
| Harrogate | 21,756.22 |
| Hartlepool | 15,957.58 |
| Hemsworth | 8,563.95 |
| Hexham | 10,169.37 |
| Houghton le Spring | 4,184.49 |
| Huddersfield | 366.72 |
| Hull East | 5,450.32 |
| Hull West | 183.17 |
| Jarrow | 2,671.17 |
| Keighley | 2,368.34 |
| Leeds East | 66.80 |
| Leeds North | 678.16 |
| Leeds North West | 16,524.51 |
| Leeds South | 4,688.79 |
| Leeds West | 18,207.69 |
| Middlesbrough | 122.37 |
| Newcastle East | 0.66 |
| Newcastle St, James | 1,380.46 |
| Newcastle West | 6.87 |
| North Shields | 810.02 |
| Northallerton | 5,005.06 |
| Peterlee | 202.75 |
| Pontefract | 34.51 |
| Redcar | 3,855.71 |
| Rotherham North | 81.98 |
| Rotherham South | 1.22 |
| Scarborough | 4,736.47 |
| Scunthorpe | 1,367.11 |
| Seaham | 150.45 |
| Sheffield North East | 4,693.94 |
| Sheffield North West | 5,788.89 |
| Sheffield South East | 311.02 |
| Sheffield South West | 45,297.45 |
| Skipton | 476.63 |
| South Shields | 1,805.34 |
| Stanley | 217.49 |
| Stockton | 3,601.20 |
| Sunderland North | 18,127.37 |
| Sunderland South | 12,538.71 |
| Wakefield | 6,728.51 |
| Wallsend | 0.00 |
| Wath on Dearne | 175.13 |
| York | 2,998.86 |
| Total | 416,577.69 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 0.16 |
Unspent budget allocations March 1990 1
| |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
North West
| |
| Accrington | 20,394.74 |
| Ashton-under-Lyne | 15,210.09 |
| Barrow in Furness | 0.00 |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
| Birkenhead North | 5.83 |
| Birkenhead South | 123.64 |
| Blackburn | 18,429.46 |
| Blackpool North | 559.09 |
| Blackpool South | 18,641.47 |
| Bolton | 3,868.83 |
| Burnley | 10,732.51 |
| Bury | 40,052.22 |
| Buxton | 229.71 |
| Carlisle | 5,819.32 |
| Chester | 10,607.77 |
| Crewe | 15,856.85 |
| Ellesmere Port | 188.26 |
| Farnworth | 0.00 |
| Hyde | 31,133.17 |
| Kendal | 8,865.11 |
| Lancaster | 30.28 |
| Leigh | 15,345.27 |
| Liverpool City | 46,445.89 |
| Liverpool Bootle | 48,932.77 |
| Liverpool Breckfield | 11,253.09 |
| Liverpool Crosby | 20,638.37 |
| Liverpool Edgehill | 3,870.30 |
| Liverpool Garston | 5.01 |
| Liverpool Huyton | 25,365.48 |
| Liverpool Kirkby | 9,450.65 |
| Liverpool Norris Green | 53.11 |
| Liverpool Toxteth | 8,805.40 |
| Liverpool West Derby | 48.52 |
| Liverpool Belle Vale | 895.09 |
| Macclesfield | 2,866.24 |
| Manchester Cheetham | 20.52 |
| Manchester Middleton | 9,783.37 |
| Manchester Sale | 32.76 |
| Manchester Central | 0.00 |
| Manchester Chorlton | 1,998.42 |
| Manchester Failsworth | 0.26 |
| Manchester Longsight | 15,410.94 |
| Manchester Openshaw | 6.25 |
| Manchester Rusholme | 44.62 |
| Manchester Wythenshawe | 728.97 |
| Northwich | 2,697.52 |
| Oldham | 18,056.00 |
| Penrith | 5,852.33 |
| Preston North | 179.68 |
| Preston South | 39,614.65 |
| Rochdale | 26.65 |
| Rossendale | 579.40 |
| St. Helens | 6.46 |
| Salford North | 6,699.22 |
| Salford South | 1,262.69 |
| Skelmersdale | 22.40 |
| Southport | 29,677.54 |
| Stockport North | 8,669.43 |
| Stockport South | 13,103.91 |
| Wallasey | 17,270.92 |
| Warrington | 7,772.67 |
| Whitehaven | 473.13 |
| Widnes | 5,640.29 |
| Wigan | 145.00 |
| Wilmslow | 95.08 |
| Workington | 12,654.77 |
| TOTAL | 593,249.40 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 0.23 |
Unspent budget allocations March 1990 1
| |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
Scotland
| |
| Aberdeen North | 26,909.43 |
| Aberdeen South | 5,268.08 |
| Airdrie | 41.49 |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
| Arbroath | 2,271.39 |
| Ayr | 28,895.36 |
| Bathgate | 97.83 |
| Bellshill | 11.89 |
| Campbeltown | 0.08 |
| Clydebank | 5,764.24 |
| Coatbridge | 11,528.26 |
| Cowdenbeath | 3.45 |
| Cumbernauld | 31,700.98 |
| Dumbarton | 17,708.87 |
| Dumfries | 14,255.65 |
| Dundee East | 3,365.57 |
| Dundee West | 49 46 |
| Dunfermline | 11.40 |
| East Kilbride | 1,194.47 |
| Edinburgh East | 145.29 |
| Edinburgh City | 0.00 |
| Edinburgh North | 6.19 |
| Edinburgh South | 18,162.03 |
| Edinburgh West | 13,326.78 |
| Elgin | 2,569.20 |
| Falkirk | 892.06 |
| Fort William | 0.00 |
| Galashiels | 3,052.40 |
| Glasgow Anniesland | 89,410.29 |
| Glasgow Bridgeton | 16,715.43 |
| Glasgow City | 2,641.67 |
| Glasgow Craigton | 32,715.48 |
| Glasgow Cranstonhill | 12,951.65 |
| Glasgow Laurieston | 19,079.73 |
| Glasgow Maryhill | 42,115.30 |
| Glasgow Partick | 7.24 |
| Glasgow Provan | 987.20 |
| Glasgow Rutherglen | 37,691.64 |
| Glasgow Shettleston | 95,686.40 |
| Glasgow South-side | 17.62 |
| Glasgow Springburn | 19,209.17 |
| Greenock | 8.16 |
| Hamilton | 12,527.14 |
| Inverness | 8,534.53 |
| Irvine | 60,288.52 |
| Johnstone | 11,130.42 |
| Kilmarnock | 8,093.01 |
| Kirkcaldy | 2,105.72 |
| Lerwick | 2,882.96 |
| Leven | 62.87 |
| Motherwell | 0.60 |
| Oban | 7,737.38 |
| Paisley | 61,244.70 |
| Perth | 105.80 |
| Peterhead | 3,526.20 |
| Port Glasgow | 15,158.70 |
| Stirling | 2,801.66 |
| Stornoway | 1,047.15 |
| Stranraer | 5,163.23 |
| Wick | 3,803.13 |
| Total | 762,622.57 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 0.29 |
Unspent budget allocations March 1990 1
| |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
Wales and South West
| |
| Aberdare | 3,128.83 |
| Abertillery | 1,092.60 |
| Aberystwyth | 3,338.00 |
| Ammanford | 2,984.98 |
| Anglesey | 19,395.94 |
| Bargoed | 3,744.14 |
| Barnstaple | 3,255.27 |
| Barry | 2,029.89 |
| Bath | 11,777.03 |
| Blackwood | 0.84 |
Total (1990–91 prices)
| |
| Bournemouth | 8,222.91 |
| Bridgend | 372.76 |
| Bridgwater | 4,542.97 |
| Bristol Central | 123.42 |
| Bristol East | 8,710.29 |
| Bristol Horfield | 3,796.69 |
| Bristol South | 7,707.26 |
| Bristol West | 3,650.65 |
| Caernarfon | 946.06 |
| Caerphilly | 1,076.48 |
| Cardiff Central | 37.93 |
| Cardiff East | 28,844.91 |
| Cardiff West | 5,870.55 |
| Carmarthen | 1,348.66 |
| Cheltenham | 23,042.49 |
| Chippenham | 291.67 |
| Colwyn Bay | 8,686.25 |
| Cwmbran | 16,379.12 |
| Deeside | 0.00 |
| Ebbw Vale | 17,978.11 |
| Exeter | 23,866.95 |
| Gloucester | 92,723.82 |
| Haverfordwest | 211.22 |
| Launceston | 912.60 |
| Llanelli | 397.13 |
| Merthyr Tydfil | 207.54 |
| Morriston | 3,390.44 |
| Neath | 1,419.19 |
| Newport Gwent | 6,373.84 |
| Newtown | 8,034.34 |
| Pembroke Dock | 443.90 |
| Penzance | 42,376.10 |
| Plymouth | 11,453.72 |
| Plymouth Crownhill | 0.00 |
| Pontypridd | 4,561.96 |
| Poole | 5,090.63 |
| Port Talbot | 21.35 |
| Porth | 4,914.22 |
| Porthmadog | 32,735.95 |
| Phyl | 16,387.59 |
| St, Austell | 21,292.46 |
| Salisbury | 1,256.77 |
| Stroud | 511.53 |
| Swansea | 0.00 |
| Swindon | 389.04 |
| Taunton | 11,679.92 |
| Tonypandy | 26,823.70 |
| Torbay | 15,082.30 |
| Trowbridge | 8,640.21 |
| Truro | 57.36 |
| Weston-super-Mare | 8,200.58 |
| Weymouth | 226.65 |
| Wrexham | 2,865.71 |
| Yeovil | 7,357.61 |
| Total | 552,283.08 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 0.21 |
| Grand Total | 5,235,486.02 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 2.02 |
Note: Percentages may not sum due to rounding.
Unspent Budget allocations March 1992 1
| |
District name
| Total (1990–91 prices)
|
| Bankside | 85.49 |
| Barking and Havering | 26.45 |
| Barnet | 8,872.95 |
| Barnsley | 2.30 |
| Bedfordshire | 2,483.53 |
| Berkshire | 111.98 |
| Birmingham Chamberlain | 88.77 |
| Birmingham Heartlands | 0.40 |
| Birmingham North West | 23.53 |
District name
| Total (1990–91 prices)
|
| Birmingham South East | 35,997.67 |
| Birmingham South West | 91.14 |
| Blackburn and Accrington | 185.08 |
| Blackpool | 57.09 |
| Bolton | 276.90 |
| Bradford | 1,602.40 |
| Bristol Severnside | 41,838.59 |
| Brunel | 0.00 |
| Buckinghamshire | 47,659.90 |
| Burnley/Pendle/Rossendale | 58.50 |
| Cambridgeshire | 13,993.36 |
| Canterbury and Thanet | 26,062.39 |
| Central Derbyshire | 15,482.12 |
| Central Staffordshire | 12.07 |
| Channel | 16,246.57 |
| Cheshire North West and Central | 0.00 |
| Cheshire East | 0.97 |
| Chesterfield and Worksop | 22.97 |
| City East | 17.91 |
| Clyde Coast and Cowal | 45.67 |
| Coatbridge | 12.59 |
| Cornwall | 75.83 |
| Coventry | 0.00 |
| Cumbria North | 166.50 |
| Cynon Merthyr Rhymney Valley | 1,803.09 |
| Derbyshire North | 22.97 |
| Derbyshire South | 6.04 |
| Devonia | 134.37 |
| Doncaster | 25,484.78 |
| Dorset | 1,605.06 |
| Durham North | 4,946.46 |
| Durham South | 43,115.86 |
| Ealing | 5.66 |
| East Lowlands | 717.44 |
| East Nottinghamshire | ERR |
| East Sussex | 30,048.11 |
| Essex South East | 0.03 |
| Essex South West | 29,285.27 |
| Euston | 0.45 |
| Fife | 6.27 |
| Forth Valley | 4.44 |
| Fulham | 7,840.92 |
| Glamorgan South | 267.75 |
| Glasgow South West | 4.16 |
| Glasgow Anniesland | 793.29 |
| Glasgow City | 19.06 |
| Glasgow East | 36,609.38 |
| Glasgow Laurieston | 21,562.21 |
| Gloucester | 695.23 |
| Grampian and Shetland | 6,941.18 |
| Gwent North and Brecon | 18,388.03 |
| Gwyneddigion | 48,448.43 |
| Hackney and Islington | 326.20 |
| Halifax | 7.53 |
| Hampshire North | 2,705.83 |
| Harrow and Hillingdon | 9,225.05 |
| Hereford and Worcester | 38,173.56 |
| Highlands and Islands | 1,568.24 |
| Hounslow and Kingston | 328.92 |
| Hull | 7.29 |
| Irvine | 19,842.47 |
| Kent North | 23.59 |
| Kirkless | 0.17 |
| Knowsley | 683.35 |
| Lancaster | 4.80 |
| Lea Roding | 3.69 |
| Leaside | 88,016.32 |
| Leeds North | 16,598.45 |
| Leeds South | 102.89 |
| Leicestershire North | 14,097.96 |
| Lewisham and Brixton | 2,507.33 |
| Lincolnshire | 79,420.49 |
| Liverpool Central | 26,615.54 |
| Liverpool North | 15.32 |
| Liverpool South | 17.64 |
| Lomond and Argyll | 323.11 |
| London Central | 1,833.64 |
District name
| Total (1990–91 prices)
|
| Lothian Central | 0.01 |
| Lothian West | 34.10 |
| Manchester Central | 19.08 |
| Manchester North | 26.21 |
| Mid Wales and Maelor | 29,122.79 |
| Motherwell | 19,828.19 |
| Neasden | 13,240.09 |
| Newcastle Upon Tyne | 31.84 |
| Newham | 0.00 |
| North and East Hertfordshire | 8,039.58 |
| North Essex | 643.04 |
| North Staffordshire | 0.61 |
| North Tyneside | 9,362.08 |
| North Wales Coast | 38,885.54 |
| North Yorkshire | 20,295.92 |
| Northamptonshire | 19,076.49 |
| Northumberland | 86.11 |
| Norwich | 5,032.41 |
| Nottinghamshire North | 8,139.65 |
| Nottinghamshire West | 6,796.07 |
| Ogwr Afan Nedd | 2.57 |
| Oldham | 0.78 |
| Oxfordshire | 5.23 |
| Preston | 4.17 |
| Renfrew | 3,741.82 |
| Rother and Dearne | 382.79 |
| South East Hants and Isle of Wight | 32.30 |
| Salford | 11,398.31 |
| Sandwell | 6.29 |
| Sefton | 5,513.37 |
| Sheffield East | 968.23 |
| Sheffield West | 30,085.84 |
| Shettleston | 36,609.38 |
| Shropshire | 0.07 |
| Solent and Forest | 13,319.57 |
| Somerset | 7,525.54 |
| South Cheshire | 1,279.10 |
| South Devon | 50,434.58 |
| South Downs | 6,556.07 |
| South Gwent and Islwyn | 1.87 |
| South Humberside | 3.49 |
| South Leicestershire | 0.01 |
| South Manchester | 37.41 |
| South West Lanes | 0.00 |
| South West Scotland | 30,910.15 |
| South West Thames | 1.36 |
| Springburn | 3.86 |
| Stockport | 250.39 |
| Suffolk | 1.78 |
| Surrey Downs | 7,892.43 |
| Surrey North | 5,346.64 |
| Swansea | 28.23 |
| Taff Rhondda | 6.89 |
| Tameside | 26.39 |
| Tayside | 5.94 |
| Tees North | 3,471.36 |
| Tees South | 1.59 |
| Thameside | 10,515.41 |
| Tyneside | 20,066.67 |
| Wakefield | 612.67 |
| Wales West | 470.33 |
| Walsall | 0.00 |
| Warwickshire | 4,456.30 |
| Wearside | 3,785.11 |
| West Herts | 8,838.76 |
| West Kent | 8,482.97 |
| West Lincolnshire | 34.15 |
| West Pennine | 87.70 |
| West Sussex | 1,408.21 |
| Wigan and Leigh | 81.93 |
| Wiltshire | 0.00 |
| Wirral | 140.19 |
| Wolverhampton | 32,737.21 |
District name
| Total (1990–91 prices)
|
| Worcestershire North | 40,511.15 |
| Yorkshire East | 9.25 |
| TOTAL | 1,333,943.95 |
| Percentage of gross expenditure | 0.42 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is the (a) total number and (b) percentage of eligible applicants who have been awarded a social fund loan in each year since its introduction; and if he will provide a breakdown by (a) region and (b) DSS office.
[holding answer 17 June 1992]: Such information as is available is in the tables. For 1988–89 and 1989–90 only regional summaries are available.
| Region | Number of awards | Percentage of eligible applicants awarded a loan |
| 1988–89 | ||
| Wales and SW | 101,631 | 91.94 |
| Scotland | 165,019 | 89.70 |
| Midlands | 125,850 | 93.80 |
| North West | 150,963 | 88.30 |
| North East | 163,410 | 88.30 |
| London North | 93,844 | 97.40 |
| London South | 78,692 | 97.70 |
| 1989–90 | ||
| Wales and SW | 114,390 | 88.10 |
| Scotland | 192,067 | 86.90 |
| Midlands | 138,704 | 90.00 |
| North West | 172,924 | 86.10 |
| North East | 190,315 | 85.10 |
| London North | 115,873 | 92.10 |
| London South | 102,907 | 92.60 |
| 1990–91 Percentage awards of eligible applicants | ||
| Office name | Awards | Per cent. |
| Aberdare | 1,905 | 88.11285846 |
| Aberdeen North ILO | 3,270 | 91.8797415 |
| Aberdeen South | 2,592 | 94.04934688 |
| Abertillery | 803 | 73.06642402 |
| Aberystwyth | 1,001 | 95.51526718 |
| Accrington | 1,224 | 91.82295574 |
| Airdrie Local Office | 5,337 | 95.88573482 |
| Aldershot | 830 | 89.92416035 |
| Ammanford | 813 | 91.76072235 |
| Andover | 1,042 | 87.05096074 |
| Anglesey | 1,457 | 84.31712963 |
| Arbroath | 1,213 | 85.78500707 |
| Ashford | 1,516 | 88.44807468 |
| Ashington ILO | 2,315 | 95.66115702 |
| Ashton-under-Lyne | 2,114 | 84.3575419 |
| Aylesbury | 927 | 88.36987607 |
| Ayr | 5,900 | 84.15347311 |
| Banbury | 913 | 83.45521024 |
| Bargoed | 1,542 | 75.99802859 |
| Barking | 1,601 | 79.69138875 |
| Barnet | 646 | 90.73033708 |
| Barnsley East | 3,567 | 91.62599538 |
| Barnsley West BO | 2,256 | 95.14972585 |
| Barnstaple | 1,409 | 84.77737665 |
| Barrow in Furness | 1,298 | 87.17259906 |
| Barry | 1,774 | 78.7394585 |
| Basildon | 3,389 | 97.44105808 |
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| Basingstoke | 673 | 82.4754902 |
| Bath | 2,478 | 91.40538547 |
| Bathgate | 5,505 | 90.02452984 |
| Bedford | 1,824 | 92.63585576 |
| Bellshill Area Office | 2,950 | 89.09694956 |
| Berwick on Tweed | 328 | 87.70053476 |
| Birkenhead North | 6,363 | 84.51321557 |
| Birkenhead South | 2,721 | 84.52935694 |
| Birmingham Edgbaston | 3,261 | 89.90901572 |
| Birmingham Erdington | 3,831 | 91.34477825 |
| Birmingham Handsworth | 4,702 | 92.86984002 |
| Birmingham Ladywood | 2,954 | 88.89557629 |
| Birmingham Northfield | 3,389 | 90.44568989 |
| Birmingham Perry Barr | 2,647 | 88.0572189 |
| Birmingham Ravenhurst ILO | 2,836 | 89.07035176 |
| Birmingham South Yardley ILO | 3,155 | 87.66323979 |
| Birmingham Sparkhill ILO | 958 | 90.8056872 |
| Birmingham Washwood Heath | 2,501 | 87.05186216 |
| Bishop Auckland ILO | 3,475 | 82.93556086 |
| Blackburn | 3,002 | 90.23143974 |
| Blackpool North | 3,230 | 90.4508541 |
| Blackpool South | 1,054 | 94.86948695 |
| Blackwood | 872 | 80.96564531 |
| Blylh | 2,159 | 81.25705683 |
| Bognor Regis | 1,320 | 90.34907598 |
| Bolton | 5,532 | 92.5083612 |
| Boston ILO | 799 | 84.1938883 |
| Bournemouth | 3,788 | 92.57086999 |
| Bracknell | 1,281 | 93.2993445 |
| Bradford East | 4,644 | 87.8214826 |
| Bradford South | 3,522 | 85.46469304 |
| Bradford West | 3,700 | 90.06815969 |
| Braintree | 1,228 | 92.67924528 |
| Bridgend | 2,007 | 81.3538711 |
| Bridgwater | 1,681 | 92.10958904 |
| Bridlington | 1,355 | 87.41935484 |
| Brighton ILO | 5,495 | 92.43061396 |
| Bristol Central | 2,490 | 85.36167295 |
| Bristol East | 2,832 | 91.97791491 |
| Bristol Horfield | 1,517 | 89.76331361 |
| Bristol South | 3,474 | 89.6516129 |
| Bristol West | 1,257 | 93.45724907 |
| Bromley | 1,186 | 92.80125196 |
| Burnley | 3,181 | 85.35014757 |
| Burton | 1,013 | 92.51141553 |
| Bury | 1,624 | 93,33333333 |
| Bury St. Edmunds | 1,704 | 93,47229841 |
| Buxton | 494 | 90.80882353 |
1990–91 Percentage awards of eligible applicants
| ||
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| Caernarfon | 1,450 | 84.54810496 |
| Caerphilly | 2,565 | 86.94915254 |
| Cambridge | 2,212 | 94.77292202 |
| Campbeltown | 440 | 85.9375 |
| Cannock ILO | 1,310 | 93.23843416 |
| Canterbury | 1,875 | 90.66731141 |
| Cardiff Central | 2,304 | 87.57126568 |
| Cardiff East | 3,815 | 77.10185934 |
| Cardiff West | 5,025 | 88.28179902 |
| Carlisle | 2,145 | 86.94770977 |
| Carmarthen | 924 | 88.16793893 |
| Castleford ILO | 1,448 | 86.5511058 |
| Chatham | 1,914 | 91.18627918 |
| Chelmsford | 788 | 93.58669834 |
| Cheltenham | 1,075 | 84.37990581 |
| Chester | 2,391 | 89.01712584 |
| Chester le Street | 1,295 | 82.32676414 |
| Chesterfield | 4,108 | 93.19419238 |
| Chichester | 646 | 96.27421759 |
| Chippenham | 1,086 | 82.8375286 |
| Clacton-on-sea | 1,486 | 93.81313131 |
| Clydebank ILO | 3,367 | 89.85855351 |
| Coatbridge | 2,914 | 90.6940554 |
| Colchester | 1,967 | 89.04481666 |
| Colwyn Bay | 1,327 | 86.16883117 |
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| Corby | 1,093 | 90.93178037 |
| Coventry East | 6,474 | 88.28583117 |
| Coventry West | 3,019 | 96.29984051 |
| Cowdenbeath ILO | 1,933 | 90.36933146 |
| Crawley. | 1,372 | 90.20381328 |
| Crewe | 2,083 | 84.91642886 |
| Croydon | 2,106 | 82.75049116 |
| Crystal Palace | 2,245 | 93.58065861 |
| Cumbernauld | 3,730 | 91.13119961 |
| Cwmbran | 2,603 | 84.70549951 |
| Darlington | 3,295 | 86.2565445 |
| Dartford | 1,122 | 90.77669903 |
| Deeside | 1,024 | 87.29752771 |
| Derby Becket St, ILO | 2,638 | 88.31603616 |
| Derby Heritage Gate | 1,267 | 97.23714505 |
| Derby London Road | 3,106 | 93.13343328 |
| Dewsbury ILO | 2,755 | 84.3797856 |
| Diss ILO | 292 | 93.89067524 |
| Doncaster East | 3,325 | 88.66666667 |
| Doncaster West | 2,410 | 96.05420486 |
| Dover | 1,560 | 91.01516919 |
| Dudley North | 2,731 | 89.54098361 |
| Dudley South | 1,496 | 92.5170068 |
| Dumbarton ILO | 3,625 | 87.244284 |
| Dumfries ILO | 1,597 | 83.78803778 |
| Dundee East | 3,159 | 85.28617711 |
| Dundee West | 3,422 | 84.76591528 |
| Dunfermline | 2,370 | 86.24454148 |
| Dunstable | 770 | 94.3627451 |
| Durham ILO | 1,329 | 85.96377749 |
1990–91 Percentage awards of eligible applicants
| ||
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| East Kilbride ILO | 1,550 | 90.80257762 |
| Eastbourne | 1,009 | 96.18684461 |
| Ebbw Vale | 1,404 | 87.58577667 |
| Edgware | 1,488 | 80.91353997 |
| Edinburgh (East) ILO | 3,816 | 86.7864453 |
| Edinburgh City | 5,018 | 94.11102776 |
| Edinburgh North | 3,600 | 90.52049283 |
| Edinburgh South | 2,956 | 88.95576286 |
| Edinburgh West | 3,348 | 92.02858714 |
| Elgin ILO | 2,103 | 92.11563732 |
| Ellesmere Port | 1,309 | 87.73458445 |
| Epsom | 329 | 98.50299401 |
| Eston | 2,228 | 79.77085571 |
| Euston Do | 4,812 | 86.54676259 |
| Exeter | 3,402 | 94.2121296 |
| Falkirk | 4,259 | 82.41099071 |
| Fareham | 1,580 | 89.61996597 |
| Farnworth | 1,432 | 82.77456647 |
| Folkestone | 1,097 | 88.61066236 |
| Fort William | 372 | 89.42307692 |
| Fulham Do | 1,113 | 94.5624469 |
| Galashiels | 1,620 | 91.83673469 |
| Gateshead | 4,523 | 87.08124759 |
| Glasgow Anniesland ILO | 5,225 | 86.95290398 |
| Glasgow Bridgeton | 4,819 | 83.47479647 |
| Glasgow City ILO | 4,227 | 87.49741254 |
| Glasgow Craigton ILO | 5,896 | 95.6676943 |
| Glasgow Cranslonhill | 2,668 | 88.72630529 |
| Glasgow Laurieston | 5,373 | 95.94642857 |
| Glasgow Maryhill | 4,756 | 94.70330546 |
| Glasgow Partick ILO | 2,914 | 90.89207735 |
| Glasgow Provan ILO | 9,377 | 87.72569932 |
| Glasgow Rutherglen | 8,174 | 88.3866782 |
| Glasgow Shettleston | 5,289 | 91.14251249 |
| Glasgow South-Side ILO | 7,054 | 84.34772211 |
| Glasgow Springburn | 8,424 | 88.61771513 |
| Gloucester | 2,163 | 94.28945074 |
| Goole ILO | 792 | 90.82568807 |
| Grantham | 844 | 96.45714286 |
| Gravesend | 970 | 87.7034358 |
| Grays | 2,028 | 94.23791822 |
| Great Yarmouth | 1,773 | 81.36759982 |
| Greenock ILO | 4,881 | 87.17628148 |
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| Grimsby | 4,144 | 81.8487063 |
| Guildford | 1,119 | 95.23404255 |
1990–91 Percentage awards of eligible applicants
| ||
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| Halifax | 3,348 | 87.11943794 |
| Hamilton ILO | 5,969 | 91.31099893 |
| Harlow | 1,457 | 91.63522013 |
| Harrogate | 993 | 96.12778316 |
| Harrow | 1,093 | 88.3589329 |
| Hartlepool | 2,755 | 79.53233256 |
| Hastings | 2,183 | 92.03204047 |
| Havant | 1,644 | 90.72847682 |
| Haverfordwest | 1,428 | 88.42105263 |
| Hemel Hempstead ILO | 887 | 99.3281075 |
| Hemsworth ILO | 1,433 | 82.78451762 |
| Hereford ILO | 1,651 | 97.92408066 |
| Hertford | 1,592 | 93.53701528 |
| Hexham | 336 | 95.45454545 |
| High Wycombe | 1,085 | 92.34042553 |
| Houghton le Spring | 1,449 | 81.63380282 |
| Hounslow | 2,860 | 92.16886884 |
| Hove | 1,474 | 91.26934985 |
| Huddersfield ILO | 4,157 | 88.84377004 |
| Hull East ILO | 5,517 | 89.7510981 |
| Hull West | 5,442 | 85.17764908 |
| Hyde | 3,108 | 89.93055556 |
| Ilford | 1,479 | 98.20717131 |
| Ilkeston | 2,090 | 90.20284851 |
| Inverness | 3,127 | 90.95404305 |
| Ipswich | 3,022 | 88.83009994 |
| Irvine | 3,896 | 85.94749614 |
| Isle of Wight | 1,703 | 90.48884166 |
| Jarrow ILO | 2,976 | 87.8135143! |
| Johnstone | 2,080 | 81.34532655 |
| Keighley ILO | 2,111 | 90.56199056 |
| Kendal | 408 | 96.45390071 |
| Kidderminster | 1,641 | 93.9862543 |
| Kilmarnock ILO | 2,801 | 86.55747837 |
| King's Lynn | 2,382 | 89.54887218 |
| Kingston | 958 | 95.99198397 |
| Kirkcaldy ILO | 2,963 | 88.31594635 |
1990–91 Percentage awards of eligible applicants
| ||
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| Lancaster | 2,827 | 89.71754998 |
| Launceston | 739 | 92.49061327 |
| Leamington Spa ILO | 1,546 | 88.44393593 |
| Leeds East ILO | 4,544 | 88.1645324 |
| Leeds North ILO | 5,024 | 92.2850845 |
| Leeds North West | 3,643 | 91.41781681 |
| Leeds South | 1,972 | 85.62744247 |
| Leeds West | 1,971 | 86.63736264 |
| Leicester Burleys Way | 1,685 | 92.07650273 |
| Leicester Lower Hill Street | 2,251 | 88.032851 |
| Leicester Norton Street | 3,024 | 92.87469287 |
| Leicester (Yeoman) Street | 3,617 | 95.10912438 |
| Leigh | 1,551 | 85.92797784 |
| Lerwick ILO | 275 | 94.50171821 |
| Leven ILO | 1,588 | 76.56702025 |
| Lewes | 871 | 96.13686534 |
| Lichfield | 1,618 | 92.24629418 |
| Lincoln Newland | 2,434 | 92.05748865 |
| Lincoln Orchard Street | 2,669 | 89.5036888 |
| Liverpool City | 3,583 | 95.49573561 |
| Liverpool Bootle | 4,060 | 86.67805295 |
| Liverpool Breckfield ILO | 4,858 | 86.27242053 |
| Liverpool Crosby | 2,785 | 86.08964451 |
| Liverpool Edgehill | 5,435 | 85.7661354 |
| Liverpool Garston | 1,936 | 82.45315162 |
| Liverpool Huyton | 5,109 | 90.8751334 |
| Liverpool Kirkby | 4,997 | 84.68056262 |
| Liverpool Norris Green | 2,630 | 83.65139949 |
| Liverpool Toxteth | 6,766 | 88.96778435 |
| Liverpool West Derby | 1,278 | 85.54216867 |
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| Liverpool (Belle) Vale ILO | 2,884 | 84.77366255 |
| Llanelli | 2,223 | 83.07174888 |
| London Plaistow | 1,906 | 88.65116279 |
| London Balham | 2,869 | 97.22128092 |
| London Battersea | 2,148 | 92.78617711 |
| London Bloomsbury | 959 | 100 |
| London Brixton | 978 | 91.83098592 |
| London Camberwell | 2,224 | 95.61478934 |
| London Canning Town | 1,724 | 85.05180069 |
| London City | 396 | 95.88377724 |
| London Cricklewood | 1,521 | 92.74390244 |
| London Ealing | 6,501 | 85.65217391 |
| London Edmonton | 2,862 | 91.49616368 |
| London Hackney | 2,714 | 91.87542316 |
| London Harlesden | 2,000 | 91.15770283 |
| London Hendon | 1,354 | 82.21007893 |
| London Hoxton ILO | 2,092 | 90.87749783 |
| London Kennington Park | 2,243 | 86.6023166 |
| London Lewisham | 3,338 | 90.97846825 |
| London Leytonstone | 1,862 | 94.18310572 |
| London Peckham | 2,106 | 85.8190709 |
| London Poplar | 2,168 | 77.04335466 |
| London Shoreditch | 2,316 | 90.29239766 |
| London Southwark | 2,565 | 88.29604131 |
| London Stepney | 1,290 | 87.04453441 |
| London Stoke Newington | 1,655 | 94.95123351 |
| London Streatham | 2,033 | 95.85101367 |
| London Thames North | 819 | 91.40625 |
| London Thames South | 803 | 98.52760736 |
| London Tottenham | 4,456 | 91.10611327 |
| London Walthamstow | 1,738 | 85.07097406 |
| London Wandsworth | 1,136 | 88.0620155 |
| London Westminster | 1,028 | 94.39853076 |
| London Wimbledon | 1,116 | 90.07263923 |
| London Wood Green | 1,744 | 77.78768956 |
| London Woodgrange Park | 2,190 | 89.71732896 |
| London Woolwich | 3,846 | 86.11733094 |
| Loughborough | 1,245 | 93.25842697 |
| Lowestoft | 1,941 | 98.22874494 |
| Luton | 2,037 | 79.16828605 |
1990–91 Percentage awards of eligible applicants
| ||
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| Macclesfield | 934 | 94.05840886 |
| Maidstone | 1,601 | 83.29864724 |
| Manchester Cheetham | 2,856 | 79.97759731 |
| Manchester Middleton | 2,237 | 85.25152439 |
| Manchester Central | 1,702 | 92.24932249 |
| Manchester Chorlton | 2,794 | 91.21776037 |
| Manchester Failsworth | 4,774 | 92.69902913 |
| Manchester Longsight | 3,604 | 93.95203337 |
| Manchester Openshaw | 3,465 | 88.1006865 |
| Manchester Rusholme | 3,366 | 97.59350536 |
| Manchester Sale | 1,612 | 87.56110809 |
| Manchester Wythenshawe | 6,642 | 89.62353259 |
| Mansfield | 2,843 | 91.35604113 |
| Merthyr Tydfil | 2,069 | 78.2526475 |
| Middlesbrough | 6,881 | 80.08612663 |
| Milton Keynes | 3,706 | 95.36798765 |
| Mitcham | 898 | 76.62116041 |
| Morriston | 1,870 | 83.51942832 |
| Motherwell ILO | 4,181 | 89.5672665 |
| Neasden ILO | 2,106 | 91.20831529 |
| Neath | 1,151 | 75.67389875 |
| New Forest | 1,114 | 93.53484467 |
| New Malden | 408 | 91.68539326 |
| Newbury | 1,306 | 94.84386347 |
| Newcastle (Staffs) | 1,750 | 88.07247106 |
| Newcastle East | 2,821 | 82.84875184 |
| Newcastle St. James | 3,420 | 84.59065051 |
| Newcastle upon Tyne West | 3,445 | 73.18886764 |
| Newport Gwent | 4,377 | 91.16850656 |
| Newtown | 975 | 93.21223709 |
| North Shields ILO | 2,493 | 84.16610398 |
| Northallerton | 397 | 87.83185841 |
| Northampton | 2,051 | 87.12829227 |
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| Northwich | 2,573 | 96.875 |
| Norwich Chantry | 2,459 | 93.74761723 |
| Norwich Mountergate | 2,603 | 93.53215954 |
| Nottingham Castle Gate | 2,439 | 80.38892551 |
| Nottingham David Lane | 3,005 | 91.56002438 |
| Nottingham Shakespeare St | 3,431 | 87.28059018 |
| Nottingham Station St ILO | 2,387 | 89.53488372 |
| Nuneaton | 2,015 | 88.53251318 |
1990–91 Percentage awards of eligible applicants
| ||
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| Oban ILO | 328 | 86.54353562 |
| Oldham | 3,310 | 89.55627706 |
| Orpington | 766 | 86.65158371 |
| Oxford | 3,433 | 93.51675293 |
| Paisley ILO | 6,109 | 85.01252435 |
| Pembroke Dock | 1,079 | 88.51517637 |
| Penrith | 333 | 95.68965517 |
| Penzance | 1,079 | 91.82978723 |
| Perth | 2,198 | 88.23765556 |
| Peterborough | 5,826 | 93.75603476 |
| Peterhead ILO | 1,337 | 92.01651755 |
| Peterlee | 1,995 | 77.71717959 |
| Plymouth | 4,938 | 93.80699088 |
| Plymouth Crownhill | 3,362 | 82.2407045 |
| Pontefract ILO | 1,608 | 84.27672956 |
| Pontypridd | 1,692 | 91.31138694 |
| Poole | 1,727 | 94.3715847 |
| Port Glasgow | 2,437 | 89.56266079 |
| Port Talbot | 1,111 | 81.27286028 |
| Porth | 836 | 86.7219917 |
| Porthmadog | 467 | 89.46360153 |
| Portsmouth North | 1,159 | 79.71114168 |
| Portsmouth South | 3,033 | 91.85342217 |
| Preston North | 2,713 | 83.27194598 |
| Preston South | 1,908 | 94.08284024 |
| Reading | 2,520 | 96.21993127 |
| Redcar ILO | 1,864 | 79.65811966 |
| Redditch | 871 | 88.51626016 |
| Redhill | 1,334 | 94.81165601 |
| Rhyl | 2,206 | 80.89475614 |
| Rochdale | 3,275 | 87.0790481 |
| Romford | 1,655 | 93.02979202 |
| Rossendale | 967 | 93.33976834 |
| Rotherham North | 1,308 | 82.00626959 |
| Rotherham South | 4,068 | 85.6962292 |
| Rugby | 771 | 93.79562044 |
1990–91 Percentage awards of eligible applicants
| ||
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| South East Thameside DO Bexley | 2,586 | 92.98813376 |
| Salford North | 3,589 | 88.96876549 |
| Salford South | 2,046 | 83.5443038 |
| Salisbury | 1,727 | 92.35294118 |
| Scarborough ILO | 1,816 | 85.21820741 |
| Scunthorpe ILO | 2,672 | 90.27027027 |
| Seaham | 1,152 | 75.59055118 |
| Sheffield North East ILO | 7,528 | 89.80078731 |
| Sheffield North East | 5,164 | 86.45571739 |
| Sheffield South West | 4,812 | 83.02277433 |
| Sheffield South West ILO | 4,774 | 99.91628296 |
| Shrewsbury | 1,911 | 97.94976935 |
| Sittingbourne | 1,539 | 86.46067416 |
| Skegness | 558 | 93.31103679 |
| Skelmersdale | 3,362 | 88.63696283 |
| Skipton | 514 | 92.11469534 |
| Slough | 1,367 | 90.05270092 |
| Smethwick | 2,650 | 91.31633356 |
| South Shields | 4,274 | 81.50266972 |
| Southampton | 4,489 | 87.0467326 |
| Southend on Sea | 1,614 | 84.99210111 |
| Southport ILO | 784 | 95.96083231 |
| St. Albans | 1,366 | 94.92703266 |
| St. Helens | 3,890 | 82.2410148 |
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| St. Austell | 2,508 | 91.83449286 |
| Stafford | 799 | 94.55621302 |
| Stanley ILO | 2,719 | 87.93661061 |
| Stevenage | 1,135 | 90.15091342 |
| Stirling | 2,922 | 87.24992535 |
| Stockport North | 2,951 | 95.37815126 |
| Stockport South | 2,723 | 93.09401709 |
| Stockton | 5,158 | 83.7201753 |
| Stoke on Trent North ILO | 2,955 | 89.11338963 |
| Stoke on Trent South | 2,558 | 86.41891892 |
| Stornoway | 672 | 96.69064748 |
| Stranraer | 1,061 | 78.01470588 |
| Stroud | 1,098 | 87.14285714 |
| Sunderland North | 5,980 | 81.43810432 |
| Sunderland South | 4,367 | 82.39622642 |
| Sutton | 578 | 85.75667656 |
| Sutton in Ashfield ILO | 1,467 | 86.70212766 |
| Swansea | 3,350 | 86.16255144 |
| Swindon | 3,072 | 86.58399098 |
Office name
| Awards
| Per cent.
|
| Taunton | 2,029 | 93.24448529 |
| Telford | 3,267 | 87.77538958 |
| Thanet | 3,382 | 91.01184069 |
| Tonypandy | 1,673 | 85.53169734 |
| Torbay | 2,705 | 87.73921505 |
| Trowbridge | 962 | 93.30746848 |
| Truro | 1,960 | 96.36184857 |
| Tunbridge Wells | 998 | 96.42512077 |
| Twickenham | 375 | 100 |
| Uxbridge ILO | 2,142 | 88.99044454 |
| Wakefield | 2,462 | 93.18697956 |
| Wallasey | 2,105 | 94.8625507 |
| Wallsend ILO | 1,999 | 86.0525183 |
| Walsall East | 2,304 | 85.68240982 |
| Walsall West | 2,769 | 89.23622301 |
| Warrington | 3,341 | 89.81182796 |
| Watford | 1,138 | 90.53301512 |
| Wath on Dearne | 2,336 | 87.58905137 |
| Wellingborough ILO | 2,626 | 91.56206416 |
| West Bromwich ILO | 3,160 | 85.72978839 |
| Weston-Super-Mare | 958 | 94.10609037 |
| Weymouth | 1,721 | 91.01004759 |
| Whitehaven | 775 | 79.8146241 |
| Wick | 854 | 84.72222222 |
| Widnes | 4,765 | 87.72091311 |
| Wigan | 3,541 | 90.10178117 |
| Wilmslow | 700 | 93.08510638 |
| Winchester | 1,082 | 94.74605954 |
| Woking | 1,418 | 94.91298527 |
| Wolverhampton North ILO | 3,843 | 90.33850494 |
| Wolverhampton South | 3,617 | 99.20460779 |
| Worcester | 2,058 | 94.79502533 |
| Workington | 676 | 56.28642798 |
| Worksop | 1,581 | 82.08722741 |
| Worthing | 1,355 | 92.61790841 |
| Wrexham | 2,878 | 80.5034965 |
| Yeovil | 986 | 90.37580202 |
| York | 3,295 | 93.42217182 |
1991–92 Percentage awards of eligible applicants
| ||
District
| Awards
| Percentage
|
| Bankside | 6,790 | 87.692109 |
| Barking and Havering DO | 3,971 | 84.11353527 |
| Barnet | 4,384 | 86.64031621 |
| Barnsley DMU | 6,468 | 90.89376054 |
| Bedfordshire | 6,616 | 86.12340536 |
| Berkshire DO | 8,919 | 93.38289184 |
| Birmingham Chamberlain | 7,735 | 90.34104181 |
| Birmingham Heartlands | 6,670 | 84.4624541 |
| Birmingham North West | 8,050 | 89.5140665 |
| Birmingham South East | 4,353 | 84.40954043 |
| Birmingham South West | 7,371 | 87.98042492 |
| Blackburn and Accrington | 4,850 | 87.43464936 |
| Blackpool DO | 6,127 | 93.84285495 |
District
| Awards
| Percentage
|
| Bolton DO | 7,638 | 90.66951567 |
| Bradford DM | 14,086 | 88.88748659 |
| Bristol Severnside | 10,221 | 91.14499732 |
| Brunel DO | 8,156 | 94.36538239 |
| Burnley/Pendle/Rossendale | 4,929 | 86.58001054 |
| Cambridgeshire | 8,375 | 92.02285463 |
| Canterbury and Thanet | 6,545 | 94.29477021 |
| Central Derbyshire | 8,346 | 90.62873276 |
| Channel | 6,780 | 93.40129494 |
| Cheshire East | 3,809 | 92.60880136 |
| Cheshire North W and Cen A | 9,868 | 87.42801453 |
| City East | 4,207 | 85.1964358 |
| Clyde Coast and Cowal | 7,836 | 82.05235602 |
| Coatbridge | 11,287 | 83.90573892 |
| Cornwall | 8,028 | 94.53603391 |
| Coventry DO | 11,479 | 89.77086103 |
| Cumbria North | 5,113 | 90.80092346 |
| Cynon Merthyr Rhymnney Val | 8,689 | 75.32726485 |
| Derbyshire North | 5,223 | 95.13661202 |
| Derbyshire South District | 5,609 | 91.99606364 |
| Doncaster DMU | 7,963 | 83.5396559 |
| Dorset | 9,664 | 92.63803681 |
| Durham North | 9,184 | 79.40515303 |
| Durham South | 7,739 | 79.890575 |
| East Lowlands | 9,783 | 82.54999578 |
| East Sussex | 3,909 | 91.58856607 |
| Essex South East | 2,791 | 87.35524257 |
| Essex South West | 8,083 | 92.55696782 |
| Euston DO | 11,924 | 91.75130809 |
| Exeter and North Devon District | 5,649 | 88.05923617 |
| Fife | 9,092 | 78.66412874 |
| Forth Valley District | 7,379 | 82.26309922 |
| Fulham DO | 14,543 | 87.92623942 |
| Glamorgan South | 14,678 | 84.38542026 |
| Glasgow (South-West) District | 13,544 | 87.90809372 |
| Glasgow Anniesland | 8,421 | 85.18106413 |
| Glasgow City District | 12,062 | 88.4246023 |
| Glasgow Lauricston | 16,392 | 87.26111259 |
| Gloucester | 5,939 | 85.07377176 |
| Grampian and Shetland | 7,934 | 90.37475795 |
| Gwent North and Brecon DO | 5,671 | 84.6670648 |
| Gwyneddigion | 6,007 | 90.82249773 |
| Hackney and Islington | 10,230 | 89.73684211 |
| Halifax | 8,464 | 89.87046082 |
| Hampshire North | 4,685 | 90.63648675 |
| Harrow and Hillingdon DO | 3,339 | 89.61352657 |
| Hereford and Worcester DO | 4,240 | 90.88960343 |
| Highlands and Islands | 8,373 | 92.18319938 |
| Hordan House, Wirral DO | 15,427 | 86.19880427 |
| Hounslow and Kingston DO | 5,962 | 90.87029416 |
| Hull East | 13,581 | 85.69535588 |
| Irvine DO | 7,331 | 81.45555556 |
| Kent-North Based | 9,004 | 87.29035385 |
| Kirklees MDU | 9,571 | 89.96146254 |
| Knowsley DO | 11,712 | 87.03277105 |
| Lancaster | 5,933 | 91.81367998 |
| Lea-Roding DO | 6,678 | 88.52067869 |
| Leaside DO | 8,629 | 91.49612978 |
| Leeds North | 9,655 | 89.75550804 |
| Leeds South | 9,354 | 83.94507763 |
| Leicester South DO | 8,073 | 91.95808179 |
| Leicestershire North DO | 5,948 | 91 14311983 |
| Lewisham and Brixton DO | 11,064 | 89.11800242 |
| Lincolnshire East | 4,067 | 89.05189402 |
| Liverpool Central | 11,065 | 88.83269107 |
| Liverpool North District O | 11,242 | 88.08964112 |
| Liverpool South | 12,921 | 85.9223301 |
| Lomond and Argyll | 6,965 | 82.24111465 |
| London Central District OFF | 3,105 | 90.41933605 |
| London Ealing | 6,935 | 85.58558559 |
| London Newham District OFF | 7,625 | 88.98354534 |
| Lothian Central | 9,819 | 90.84096586 |
| Lothian West Do | 9,216 | 81.76011356 |
| Manchester Central District | 9,251 | 89.08898305 |
District
| Awards
| Percentage
|
| Manchester North | 5,421 | 85.91125198 |
| Mid Wales and Maelor | 4,780 | 86.87749909 |
| Motherwell District | 11,613 | 86.22661123 |
| Neasden District OFF | 7,551 | 91.64947202 |
| Newcastle Upon Tyne District | 11,981 | 80.37702938 |
| North and East Herts DO | 3,217 | 92.68222414 |
| North Essex District | 5,417 | 91.0267182 |
| North Stalls District OFF | 9,603 | 90.37267081 |
| North Tees | 8,497 | 73.52890273 |
| North Tyneside District | 4,949 | 82.53835891 |
| North Wales Coast | 5,792 | 88.17171563 |
| North Yorkshire | 5,781 | 93.72568093 |
| Northamptonshire | 6,763 | 85.03709292 |
| Northumberland | 6,494 | 89.19104519 |
| Norwich | 8,527 | 87.14358712 |
| Nottinghamshire East | 6,681 | 87.13968958 |
| Nottinghamshire North | 7,361 | 88.2296536 |
| Nottinghamshire West DO | 8,654 | 85.14364423 |
| Ogwr Afan Nedd | 5,615 | 80.58266361 |
| Oldham DO | 9,763 | 89.85734008 |
| Oxfordshire | 6,762 | 92.26361032 |
| Paisley DO | 9,148 | 86.17181613 |
| Preston DO | 5,686 | 92.92368034 |
| Rotherham South ILO | 8,281 | 83.51991931 |
| S.E. Hants and Wight DO | 11,273 | 89.46825397 |
| Salford | 6,703 | 90.92512208 |
| Sandwell DO | 7359 | 88.6626506 |
| Sefton DO | 10,656 | 87.30132722 |
| Sheffield East | 14,501 | 88.96319018 |
| Sheffield West | 11,387 | 90.47354203 |
| Shettleston | 19,224 | 82.48165787 |
| Shropshire DO | 6,130 | 90.34635225 |
| Solent and forest | 9,625 | 89.85250187 |
| Somerset | 6,000 | 94.10288582 |
| South Cheshire | 11,557 | 89.74916518 |
| South Devon | 15,237 | 88.2434702 |
| South Downs | 9,868 | 93.1822474 |
| South Gwent and Islwyn | 7,185 | 86.4412897 |
| South Humberside | 9,047 | 84.18946585 |
| South Manchester | 15,627 | 92.14033019 |
| South Tees | 12,462 | 79.46690473 |
| South West Lanes | 8,108 | 86.11789697 |
| South West Thames | 9,580 | 89.51597832 |
| Springburn DO | 12,879 | 83.07960263 |
| Staffordshire Central DO | 4,797 | 90.74914869 |
| Stockport | 6,560 | 95.40430483 |
| Suffolk DO | 7,623 | 92.08746074 |
| Surrey Downs DO | 5,045 | 92.79014162 |
| Surrey North | 6,586 | 84.31698886 |
| SW Scotland District | 8,013 | 80.25841346 |
| Swansea | 5,606 | 80.76646016 |
| Taff Rhondda DO | 4,928 | 83.56791589 |
| Tameside DO | 6,748 | 87.62498377 |
| Tayside DO | 10,950 | 80.42600073 |
| Thameside | 7,943 | 86.86570429 |
| Tyneside South | 15,177 | 84.03189192 |
| Wakefield DO | 8,420 | 85.83953512 |
| Wales West | 7,290 | 85.33302119 |
| Walsall District | 7,150 | 86.7929109 |
| Warwickshire District | 5,191 | 92.00638072 |
| Wearside | 13,719 | 80.91418461 |
| West Herts DO | 4,381 | 93.59111301 |
| West Kent District | 4,974 | 89.75099242 |
| West Lincolnshire | 7,613 | 92.01111917 |
| West Pennine | 8,784 | 88.74520105 |
| West Sussex | 7,122 | 91.89677419 |
| Wigan and Leigh District | 5,985 | 86.45096057 |
| Wiltshire | 9,122 | 90.98344305 |
| Wolverhampton | 8,999 | 93.84711649 |
| Worcestershire North | 6,766 | 89.32013201 |
| Yorkshire East | 5,136 | 90.16853933 |
Scotland
Housing Expenditure
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the total public expenditure on housing expressed in (a) cash terms, (b) at 1990–91 prices and (c) as a percentage of total Scottish Office expenditure for each year since 1979 inclusive; and if he will provide a breakdown by local authority.
[holding answer 17 June 1992]: The information is in the tables. Table 1 provides details of the total gross public expenditure on housing which lies within the responsibility of my right hon. Friend; tables 2 and 3 provide details of capital expenditure on housing by local authorities in each year since 1979. expressed in cash terms and at 1990–91 prices, using GDP deflators.
| Table 1 | |||
| Column 1 (£ million) | Column 2 (£ million) | Column 3 (per cent.) | |
| 1979–80 | 773 | 1,677 | 17 |
| 1980–81 | 855 | 1,568 | 16 |
| 1981–82 | 923 | 1,544 | 16 |
| 1982–83 | 870 | 1,358 | 13 |
| 1983–84 | 962 | 1,435 | 14 |
| Table 2 | |||||||||||||
| Housing capital expenditure by local authority (cash terms) | |||||||||||||
| £ million | |||||||||||||
| Authority | 1979–80 | 1980–81 | 1981–82 | 1982–83 | 1983–84 | 1984–85 | 1985–86 | 1986–87 | 1987–88 | 1988–89 | 1989–90 | 1990–91 | 1991–921 |
| Borders | |||||||||||||
| Berwickshire | 0.832 | 0.957 | 1.068 | 1.225 | 1.731 | 1.182 | 1.384 | 1.169 | 1.337 | 1.579 | 1.337 | 1.419 | 1.384 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 0.851 | 0.737 | 1.222 | 1.395 | 2.147 | 1.421 | 1.327 | 1.668 | 2.179 | 2.733 | 2.692 | 2.536 | 2.447 |
| Roxburgh | 2.497 | 2.603 | 2.605 | 4.473 | 4.807 | 3.674 | 2.860 | 3.373 | 4.454 | 4.594 | 4.989 | 4.765 | 4.010 |
| Tweeddale | 0.596 | 0.712 | 0.475 | 0.261 | 0.661 | 0.516 | 0.426 | 0.934 | 1.459 | 0.767 | 0.714 | 0.873 | 0.952 |
| Central | |||||||||||||
| Clackmannan | 2.688 | 2.410 | 2.165 | 2.744 | 3.444 | 2.056 | 2.207 | 2.881 | 5.738 | 6.633 | 5.766 | 4.983 | 4.811 |
| Falkirk | 5.085 | 5.034 | 5.819 | 9.426 | 11.790 | 10.110 | 10.842 | 12.746 | 16.990 | 20.448 | 15.105 | 16.745 | 19.011 |
| Stirling | 4.367 | 5.157 | 4.960 | 5.312 | 5.285 | 5.121 | 5.969 | 7.085 | 8.754 | 9.159 | 9.714 | 8.813 | 9.302 |
| Dumfries and Galloway | |||||||||||||
| Annandale and Eskdale | 3.158 | 3.707 | 3.922 | 4.516 | 4.700 | 3.623 | 2.811 | 3.271 | 4.239 | 3.832 | 4.807 | 4.711 | 3.913 |
| Nithsdale | 2.118 | 2.056 | 2.168 | 3.249 | 3.970 | 3.001 | 3.631 | 5.200 | 6.460 | 7.355 | 7.164 | 6.714 | 6.214 |
| Stewartry | 1.311 | 1.278 | 1.560 | 1.576 | 1.954 | 1.565 | 1.682 | 1.698 | 1.976 | 2.202 | 2.229 | 1.887 | 2.144 |
| Wigtown | 1.547 | 1.542 | 1.889 | 2.072 | 3.930 | 2.253 | 2.614 | 3.209 | 3.933 | 3.954 | 3.698 | 3.961 | 3.941 |
| Fife | |||||||||||||
| Dunfermline | 4.951 | 4.257 | 5.453 | 7.037 | 7.949 | 7.978 | 8.928 | 9.622 | 14.627 | 13.019 | 11.244 | 10.836 | 11.143 |
| Kirkcaldy | 5.712 | 5.875 | 8.731 | 11.237 | 10.431 | 8.010 | 8.816 | 9.339 | 13.421 | 14.165 | 13.742 | 13.227 | 11.668 |
| North East Fife | 3.279 | 2.960 | 2.678 | 4.010 | 5.592 | 4.629 | 4.641 | 6.553 | 5.914 | 5.262 | 5.266 | 5.833 | 4.971 |
| Grampian | |||||||||||||
| Aberdeen | 15.678 | 14.618 | 13.418 | 10.162 | 19.144 | 19.334 | 15.177 | 19.269 | 23.680 | 0.000 | 19.457 | 19.096 | 21.192 |
| Banff and Buchan | 4.867 | 5.258 | 4.412 | 5.148 | 5.824 | 5.712 | 5.327 | 5.418 | 5.602 | 5.416 | 5.139 | 5.112 | 6.110 |
| Gordon | 1.688 | 2.338 | 3.777 | 6.023 | 7.897 | 4.856 | 6.892 | 7.339 | 8.500 | 8.619 | 8.890 | 8.266 | 8.307 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 0.838 | 1.212 | 1.884 | 2.913 | 4.063 | 3.732 | 4.330 | 4.235 | 5.212 | 4.504 | 4.803 | 6.566 | 5.090 |
| Moray | 6.465 | 5.933 | 5.247 | 6.479 | 6.545 | 5.624 | 4.777 | 4.950 | 7.538 | 6.924 | 6.446 | 6.116 | 7.007 |
| Highland | |||||||||||||
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 0.810 | 1.014 | 1.479 | 0.939 | 1.201 | 0.933 | 0.720 | 0.655 | 0.902 | 0.754 | 1.779 | 1 .664 | 1.549 |
| Caithness | 1.863 | 2.185 | 1.855 | 3.284 | 6.995 | 4.160 | 3.481 | 4.090 | 4.764 | 4.969 | 4.094 | 3.977 | 3.320 |
| Inverness | 3.130 | 3.473 | 3.231 | 3.940 | 6.364 | 4.228 | 5.051 | 5.564 | 5.570 | 6.144 | 7.794 | 7.988 | 6.390 |
| Lochaber | 1.921 | 2.153 | 2.099 | 1.638 | 2.238 | 2.526 | 3.091 | 3.788 | 4.271 | 4.421 | 5.929 | 4.562 | 3.701 |
| Nairn | 0.389 | 0.520 | 0.987 | 0.617 | 0.669 | 0.884 | 0.924 | 0.835 | 1.194 | 1.227 | 1.226 | 1.275 | 1.279 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 3.594 | 3.401 | 3.793 | 5.244 | 8.500 | 5.672 | 5.959 | 7.299 | 8.317 | 9.275 | 8.773 | 8.642 | 8.390 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 0.790 | 0.674 | 0.844 | 1.116 | 1.841 | 1.508 | 2.289 | 2.591 | 2.743 | 2.949 | 2.773 | 2.654 | 2.762 |
| Sutherland | 0.882 | 0.690 | 0.916 | 1.664 | 1.763 | 2.209 | 2.133 | 2.717 | 2.497 | 2.741 | 3.030 | 2.626 | 2.646 |
| Lothian | |||||||||||||
| East Lothian | 2.975 | 3.696 | 5.059 | 7.540 | 10.409 | 6.706 | 6.860 | 8.765 | 12.847 | 14.907 | 11.107 | 9.759 | 9.805 |
| Edinburgh | 14.328 | 19.401 | 25.963 | 27.034 | 46.977 | 30.361 | 42.521 | 41.148 | 67.142 | 71.995 | 70.282 | 68.770 | 54.263 |
| Midlothian | 1.986 | 2.266 | 2.720 | 4.019 | 5.793 | 5.260 | 4.570 | 5.098 | 6.331 | 6.041 | 5.652 | 7.766 | 6.018 |
| West Lothian | 2.879 | 3.060 | 4.258 | 5.705 | 6.434 | 6.101 | 6.958 | 8.372 | 8.931 | 9.275 | 12.066 | 8.340 | 8.937 |
| Strathclyde | |||||||||||||
| Argyll and Bute | 3.784 | 5.330 | 6.575 | 8.270 | 9.169 | 9.065 | 6.403 | 8.215 | 9.539 | 10.092 | 9.893 | 8.566 | 10.398 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 1.205 | 0.751 | 0.824 | 0.771 | 1.061 | 0.869 | 0.908 | 1.540 | 1.898 | 2.405 | 1.848 | 1.977 | 1.696 |
Column 1 (£ million)
| Column 2 (£ million)
| Column 3 (per cent.)
| |
| 1984–85 | 705 | 1,002 | 10 |
| 1985–86 | 694 | 935 | 10 |
| 1986–87 | 710 | 926 | 9 |
| 1987–88 | 887 | 1,097 | 11 |
| 1988–89 | 913 | 1,053 | 11 |
| 1989–90 | 1,122 | 1,214 | 13 |
| 1990–91 | 1,083 | 1,083 | 11 |
| 1991–92 | 1,246 | 1,081 | 11 |
Notes:
1. Column 1 lists in cash terms the total gross public expenditure on housing in Scotland which lies within the responsibility of the Secretary of State for Scotland. This includes gross capital expenditure by local authorities, new towns. Scottish Homes and it's predecessors, the Scottish Special Housing Association and the Housing Corporation in Scotland, as well as current expenditure on grants and subsidies by central government. The figure for 1991–92 is provisional.
2. Column 2 expresses the figures shown in column 1 in 1990–91 prices, using GDP deflators.
3. Since gross total figures for Scottish Office expenditure are not available. Column 3 expresses the figures shown in Column 1 as a percentage of the total net public expenditure within the responsibility of the Secretary of State for Scotland for the relevant year, expressed in cash terms.
4. The figures for years 1979–80 to 1983–84 are not directly comparable with those for 1984–85 to 1991–92 due to the changes in the definition of the Planning Total announced in Cm 441.
Authority
| 1979–80
| 1980–81
| 1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84
| 1984–85
| 1985–86
| 1986–87
| 1987–88
| 1988–89
| 1989–90
| 1990–91
| 1991–92 1
|
| Clydebank | 1.963 | 2.884 | 2.441 | 3.293 | 4.013 | 3.452 | 4.458 | 5.389 | 6.975 | 7.734 | 7.744 | 7.939 | 7.397 |
| Clydesdale | 1.361 | 1.338 | 1.556 | 2.060 | 3.139 | 2.249 | 2.241 | 2.679 | 3.365 | 4.723 | 4.863 | 4.887 | 4.910 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 1.848 | 0.965 | 1.104 | 1.406 | 1.571 | 1.107 | 1.383 | 1.720 | 2.544 | 2.714 | 2.161 | 2.346 | 2.103 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 1.731 | 1.866 | 1.599 | 1.836 | 1.904 | 1.492 | 1.631 | 2.255 | 3.743 | 3.656 | 3.721 | 3.720 | 3.141 |
| Cunninghame | 5.527 | 6.204 | 6.371 | 4.415 | 8.049 | 5.728 | 6.194 | 7.393 | 11.262 | 13.103 | 14.606 | 14.319 | 13.742 |
| Dumbarton | 2.093 | 2.428 | 2.736 | 2.064 | 3.668 | 2.267 | 2.690 | 4.057 | 6.932 | 6.901 | 8.992 | 9.050 | 8.419 |
| East Kilbride | 0.767 | 0.846 | 0.995 | 1.014 | 1.390 | 0.861 | 0.755 | 0.753 | 0.731 | 0.816 | 0.953 | 1.005 | 1.289 |
| Eastwood | 0.391 | 0.330 | 0.472 | 0.384 | 1.132 | 1.285 | 1.165 | 1.174 | 1.438 | 1.564 | 1.455 | 1.849 | 1.380 |
| Glasgow | 77.250 | 79.770 | 79.614 | 88.167 | 143.049 | 135.365 | 106.981 | 113.465 | 154.780 | 137.208 | 153.598 | 138.079 | 124.443 |
| Hamilton | 6.597 | 6.240 | 5.274 | 5.397 | 5.387 | 4.851 | 6.132 | 6.290 | 11.899 | 11.202 | 13.152 | 13.300 | 11.406 |
| Inverclyde | 5.911 | 5.809 | 5.027 | 6.888 | 11.618 | 5.570 | 6.813 | 7.776 | 8.075 | 9.658 | 11.236 | 10.352 | 11.154 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 3.083 | 2.149 | 2.079 | 2.273 | 4.269 | 3.203 | 4.040 | 4.727 | 6.077 | 7.806 | 8.480 | 8.444 | 7.910 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 4.408 | 3.733 | 4.412 | 4.692 | 6.227 | 4.589 | 5.640 | 6.252 | 9.419 | 8.819 | 8.201 | 7.859 | 8.001 |
| Monklands | 8.862 | 8.524 | 8.394 | 10.425 | 7.516 | 5.077 | 6.235 | 8.363 | 13.030 | 13.075 | 15.913 | 16.414 | 14.239 |
| Motherwell | 10.466 | 9.547 | 9.084 | 8.329 | 8.118 | 6.801 | 8.534 | 10.955 | 12.362 | 18.284 | 19.497 | 19.296 | 19.981 |
| Renfrew | 8.144 | 9.646 | 9.524 | 10.968 | 15.335 | 14.201 | 14.477 | 15.563 | 21.461 | 26.238 | 24.010 | 25.429 | 22.407 |
| Strathkelvin | 4.221 | 4.460 | 4.213 | 3.506 | 5.759 | 3.573 | 4.228 | 5.775 | 6.185 | 6.670 | 6.538 | 6.545 | 5.914 |
Tayside
| |||||||||||||
| Angus | 2.231 | 3.512 | 3.422 | 3.812 | 5.079 | 4.159 | 4.512 | 4.875 | 5.565 | 5.178 | 5.750 | 6.210 | 6.120 |
| Dundee | 7.210 | 9.163 | 9.020 | 11.928 | 16.298 | 13.498 | 14.405 | 15.441 | 22.458 | 21.004 | 26.106 | 28.239 | 24.329 |
| Perth and Kinross | 5.346 | 4.997 | 3.808 | 4.518 | 8.730 | 8.903 | 6.191 | 6.716 | 6.937 | 9.790 | 10.237 | 6.807 | 8.114 |
Islands Areas
| |||||||||||||
| Orkney | 1.721 | 1.761 | 1.605 | 2.005 | 3.011 | 2.731 | 2.060 | 1.433 | 1.808 | 2.201 | 2.401 | 2.124 | 1.316 |
| Shetland | 3.530 | 3.540 | 2.753 | 3.296 | 3.732 | 4.390 | 3.793 | 5.058 | 4.364 | 6.621 | 5.557 | 5.726 | 5.415 |
| Western Isles | 3.097 | 3.609 | 4.982 | 5.835 | 6.719 | 8.103 | 6.721 | 5.893 | 7.867 | 8.859 | 8.748 | 9.096 | 8.101 |
Table 3
| |||||||||||||
Housing capital expenditure by local authority (real terms at 1990–91 prices)
| |||||||||||||
£ million
| |||||||||||||
Authority
| 1979–80
| 1980–81
| 1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84
| 1984–85
| 1985–86
| 1986–87
| 1987–88
| 1988–89
| 1989–90
| 1990–91 1
| 1991–92
|
Borders
| |||||||||||||
| Berwickshire | 1.805 | 1.755 | 1.786 | 1.912 | 2.583 | 1.679 | 1.864 | 1.524 | 1.653 | 1.821 | 1.447 | 1.419 | 1.200 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 1.847 | 1.351 | 2.044 | 2.178 | 3.203 | 2.019 | 1.787 | 2.175 | 2.694 | 3.151 | 2.912 | 2.536 | 2.122 |
| Roxburgh | 5.418 | 4.773 | 4.356 | 6.983 | 7.172 | 5.220 | 3.851 | 4.397 | 5.507 | 5.297 | 5.398 | 4.765 | 3.478 |
| Tweeddale | 1.293 | 1.306 | 0.794 | 0.407 | 0.986 | 0.733 | 0.574 | 1.218 | 1.804 | 0.884 | 0.772 | 0.873 | 0.826 |
Central
| |||||||||||||
| Clackmannan | 5.833 | 4.419 | 3.620 | 4.284 | 5.138 | 2.921 | 2.972 | 3.756 | 7.095 | 7.649 | 6.238 | 4.983 | 4.173 |
| Falkirk | 11.034 | 9.231 | 9.731 | 14.715 | 17.590 | 14.365 | 14.599 | 16.616 | 21.007 | 23.579 | 16.342 | 16.745 | 16.489 |
| Stirling | 9.476 | 9.456 | 8.294 | 8.292 | 7.885 | 7.276 | 8.037 | 9.236 | 10.824 | 10.561 | 10.510 | 8.813 | 8.068 |
Dumfries and Galloway
| |||||||||||||
| Annandale and Eskdale | 6.353 | 6.798 | 6.559 | 7.050 | 7.012 | 5.148 | 3.785 | 4.264 | 5.241 | 4.419 | 5.201 | 4.711 | 3.394 |
| Nithsdale | 4.596 | 3.770 | 3.625 | 5.072 | 5.923 | 4.264 | 4.889 | 6.779 | 7.987 | 8.481 | 7.751 | 6.714 | 5.390 |
| Stewartry | 2.845 | 2.343 | 2.609 | 2.460 | 2.915 | 2.224 | 2.265 | 2.214 | 2.443 | 2.539 | 2.412 | 1.887 | 1.860 |
| Wigtown | 3.357 | 2.828 | 3.159 | 3.235 | 5.863 | 3.201 | 3.520 | 4.183 | 4.863 | 4.559 | 4.001 | 3.961 | 3.418 |
Fife
| |||||||||||||
| Dunfermline | 10.743 | 7.806 | 9.119 | 10.985 | 11.859 | 11.335 | 12.022 | 12.544 | 18.085 | 15.013 | 12.165 | 10.836 | 9.665 |
| Kirkcaldy | 12.394 | 10.773 | 14.601 | 17.542 | 15.562 | 11.381 | 11.871 | 12.175 | 16.594 | 16.334 | 14.867 | 13.227 | 10.120 |
| North East Fife | 7.115 | 5.428 | 4.478 | 6.260 | 8.343 | 6.577 | 6.249 | 8.543 | 7.312 | 6.068 | 5.697 | 5.833 | 4.312 |
Grampian
| |||||||||||||
| Aberdeen | 34.020 | 26.805 | 22.439 | 15.864 | 28.561 | 27.470 | 20.436 | 25.120 | 29.279 | 0.000 | 21.051 | 19.096 | 18.381 |
| Banff and Buchan | 10.561 | 9.642 | 7.378 | 8.036 | 8.689 | 8.116 | 7.173 | 7.063 | 6.927 | 6.245 | 5.560 | 5.112 | 5.300 |
| Gordon | 3.663 | 4.287 | 6.316 | 9.402 | 11.782 | 6.900 | 9.280 | 9.568 | 10.510 | 9.939 | 9.618 | 8.266 | 7.205 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 1.818 | 2.222 | 3.151 | 4.547 | 6.062 | 5.303 | 5.830 | 5.521 | 6.444 | 5.194 | 5.196 | 6.566 | 4.415 |
| Moray | 14.028 | 10.879 | 8.774 | 10.114 | 9.765 | 7.991 | 6.432 | 6.453 | 9.320 | 7.984 | 6.974 | 6.116 | 6.078 |
Highland
| |||||||||||||
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 1.758 | 1.859 | 2.473 | 1.466 | 1.792 | 1.326 | 0.970 | 0.854 | 1.115 | 0.869 | 1.925 | 1.664 | 1.344 |
| Caithness | 4.043 | 4.007 | 3.102 | 5.127 | 10.436 | 5.911 | 4.687 | 5.332 | 5.890 | 5.730 | 4.429 | 3.977 | 2.880 |
| Inverness | 6.792 | 6.369 | 5.403 | 6.151 | 9.495 | 6.007 | 6.801 | 7.254 | 6.887 | 7.085 | 8.432 | 7.988 | 5.542 |
| Lochaber | 4.168 | 3.948 | 3.510 | 2.557 | 3.339 | 3.589 | 4.162 | 4.938 | 5.281 | 5.098 | 6.415 | 4.562 | 3.210 |
| Hairn | 0.844 | 0.954 | 1.651 | 0.963 | 0.998 | 1.256 | 1.244 | 1.089 | 1.476 | 1.415 | 1.326 | 1.275 | 1.109 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 7.799 | 6.236 | 6.343 | 8.186 | 12.681 | 8.059 | 8.024 | 9.515 | 10.284 | 10.695 | 9.492 | 8.642 | 7.277 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 1.714 | 1.236 | 1.411 | 1.742 | 2.747 | 2.143 | 3.082 | 3.378 | 3.392 | 3.401 | 3.000 | 2.654 | 2.396 |
| Sutherland | 1.914 | 1.265 | 1.532 | 2.598 | 2.630 | 3.139 | 2.872 | 3.542 | 3.087 | 3.161 | 3.278 | 2.626 | 2.295 |
Lothian
| |||||||||||||
| East Lothian | 6.455 | 6.777 | 8.460 | 11.770 | 15.529 | 9.528 | 9.237 | 11.427 | 15.885 | 17.190 | 12.017 | 9.759 | 8.504 |
| Edinburgh | 31.090 | 35.576 | 43.417 | 42.202 | 70.086 | 43.848 | 57.256 | 53.643 | 83.017 | 83.019 | 76.038 | 68.770 | 47.066 |
| Midlothian | 4.309 | 4.155 | 4.549 | 6.274 | 8.643 | 7.474 | 6.154 | 6.646 | 7.828 | 6.966 | 6.115 | 7.766 | 5.220 |
| West Lothian | 6.247 | 5.611 | 7.121 | 8.906 | 9.599 | 8.669 | 9.369 | 10.914 | 11.043 | 10.695 | 13.054 | 8.340 | 7.752 |
Strathclyde
| |||||||||||||
| Argyll and Bute | 8.211 | 9.774 | 10.995 | 12.910 | 13.679 | 12.880 | 8.622 | 10.710 | 11.794 | 11.637 | 10.703 | 8.566 | 9.019 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 2.615 | 1.377 | 1.378 | 1.204 | 1.583 | 1.235 | 1.223 | 2.008 | 2.347 | 2.773 | 1.999 | 1.977 | 1.471 |
| Clydebank | 4.260 | 5.288 | 4.082 | 5.141 | 5.987 | 4.905 | 6.003 | 7.025 | 8.624 | 8.918 | 8.378 | 7.939 | 6.416 |
| Clydesdale | 2.953 | 2.454 | 2.602 | 3.216 | 4.683 | 3.195 | 3.018 | 3.493 | 4.161 | 5.446 | 5.261 | 4.887 | 4.259 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 4.010 | 1.770 | 1.846 | 2.195 | 2.344 | 1.573 | 1.862 | 2.242 | 3.146 | 3.130 | 2.338 | 2.346 | 1.824 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 3.756 | 3.422 | 2.674 | 2.866 | 2.841 | 2.120 | 2.196 | 2.940 | 4.628 | 4.216 | 4.026 | 3.720 | 2.724 |
| Cunninghame | 11.993 | 11.376 | 10.654 | 6.892 | 12.008 | 8.139 | 8.340 | 9.638 | 13.925 | 15.109 | 15.802 | 14.819 | 11.919 |
| Dumbarton | 4.542 | 4.452 | 4.575 | 3.222 | 5.472 | 3.221 | 3.622 | 5.289 | 8.571 | 7.958 | 9.728 | 9.050 | 7.302 |
| East Kilbride | 1.664 | 1.551 | 1.664 | 1.583 | 2.074 | 1.223 | 1.017 | 0.982 | 0.904 | 0.941 | 1.031 | 1.005 | 1.118 |
Authority
| 1979–80
| 1980–81
| 1981–82
| 1982–83
| 1983–84
| 1984–85
| 1985–86
| 1986–87
| 1987–88
| 1988–89
| 1989–90
| 1990–91 1
| 1991–92
|
| Eastwood | 0.848 | 0.605 | 0.789 | 0.599 | 1.689 | 1.826 | 1.569 | 1.530 | 1.778 | 1.803 | 1.574 | 1.849 | 1.197 |
| Glasgow | 167.625 | 146.276 | 133.136 | 137.634 | 213.417 | 192.332 | 144.053 | 147.920 | 191.377 | 158.218 | 166.178 | 138.079 | 107.937 |
| Hamilton | 14.315 | 11.442 | 8.820 | 8.425 | 8.037 | 6.892 | 8.257 | 8.200 | 14.712 | 12.917 | 14.229 | 13.300 | 9.893 |
| Inverclyde | 12.826 | 10.652 | 8.406 | 10.753 | 17.333 | 7.914 | 9.174 | 10.137 | 9.984 | 11.137 | 12.156 | 10.352 | 9.675 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 6.690 | 3.941 | 3.477 | 3.548 | 6.369 | 4.551 | 5.440 | 6.162 | 7.514 | 9.001 | 9.175 | 8.444 | 6.861 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 9.565 | 6.845 | 7.378 | 7.324 | 9.290 | 6.520 | 7.594 | 8.150 | 11.646 | 10.169 | 8.873 | 7.859 | 6.940 |
| Monklands | 19.230 | 15.631 | 14.037 | 16.274 | 11.213 | 7.214 | 8.396 | 10.903 | 16.111 | 15.077 | 17.216 | 16.414 | 12.350 |
| Motherwell | 22.710 | 17.507 | 15.191 | 13.002 | 12.111 | 9.663 | 11.491 | 14.282 | 15.285 | 21.084 | 21.094 | 19.296 | 17.331 |
| Renfrew | 17.672 | 17.688 | 15.927 | 17.122 | 22.878 | 20.177 | 19.494 | 20.289 | 26.535 | 30.256 | 25.976 | 25.429 | 19.435 |
| Strathkelvin | 9.159 | 8.178 | 7.045 | 5.473 | 8.592 | 5.077 | 5.693 | 7.529 | 7.647 | 7.691 | 7.073 | 6.545 | 5.130 |
Tayside
| |||||||||||||
| Angus | 4.841 | 6.440 | 5.723 | 5.951 | 7.577 | 5.909 | 6.076 | 6.355 | 6.881 | 5.971 | 6.221 | 6.210 | 5.308 |
| Dundee | 15.645 | 16.802 | 15.084 | 18.620 | 24.315 | 19.178 | 19.397 | 20.130 | 27.768 | 24.220 | 28.244 | 28.239 | 21.102 |
| Perth and Kinross | 11.600 | 9.163 | 6.368 | 7.053 | 13.024 | 12.650 | 8.336 | 8.755 | 8.577 | 11.289 | 11.075 | 6.807 | 7.038 |
Islands Areas
| |||||||||||||
| Orkney | 3.734 | 3.229 | 2.684 | 3.130 | 4.492 | 3.880 | 2.774 | 1.868 | 2.235 | 2.538 | 2.598 | 2.124 | 1.141 |
| Shetland | 7.660 | 6.491 | 4.604 | 5.145 | 5.568 | 6.237 | 5.107 | 6.594 | 5.396 | 7.635 | 6.012 | 5.726 | 4.697 |
| Western Isles | 6.720 | 6.618 | 8.331 | 9.109 | 10.024 | 11.513 | 9.050 | 7.682 | 9.727 | 10.216 | 9.464 | 9.096 | 7.027 |
1 Provisional. | |||||||||||||
Rents-To-Mortgages
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many homes have been bought under the rents-to-mortgages scheme in district councils and Scottish Homes; and if he will list them by district councils.
(holding answer 26 June 1992): Based on returns to 31 May 1992, a total of 46 local authority and 265 Scottish Homes properties have been sold under the rent-to-mortgage scheme. A breakdown by district council for local authority sales and by Scottish Homes district office for Scottish Homes sales is shown in the table. The boundaries of Scottish Homes district offices do not align exactly with those of district councils.
| Rent to mortgage sales | |
| District/Islands Councils | |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 1 |
| Tweeddale | 1 |
| Clackmannan | 1 |
| Stirling | 4 |
| Nithsdale | 1 |
| Kirkcaldy | 4 |
| East Lothian | 9 |
| Midlothian | 6 |
| Eastwood | 2 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 3 |
| Monklands | 1 |
| Renfrew | 7 |
| Angus | 4 |
| Dundee | 1 |
| Orkney | 1 |
| Total | 46 |
| Scottish Homes | |
| Edinburgh | 7 |
| Lothian and Borders | 64 |
| Central | 25 |
| Fife | 28 |
| Grampian | 34 |
| Tayside | 11 |
| Highlands and Islands | 9 |
| Lanarkshire | 15 |
| Renfrew and Inverclyde | 26 |
| Ayrshire | 24 |
| Glasgow North and East | 10 |
| Glasgow South | 2 |
| Glasgow West | 10 |
| Total | 265 |
Placenta (Cosmetic Research)
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what criteria govern the sale by Scottish health authorities of unifected placenta for the purpose of cosmetic research; whether the knowledge or consent of the women involved is required; and if he will make a statement.
Unless a patient has indicated otherwise, placentae will be treated by hospitals as clinical waste and it is for health boards to decide on the appropriate arrangements for disposal. In some cases placentae are collected by pharmaceutical companies who use these to produce immunoglobulin but I am not aware of placentae being used other than for medical purposes. I shall ask health boards to ensure that the disposal arrangements meet with the agreement of the patient.
Training
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what discussions her Department is having about the quality and quantity of youth training places in Scotland.
The Scottish Office is in regular routine contact with Scottish Enterprise and Highlands and Islands Enterprise about the overall performance of the whole range of their programmes, including youth training.
Nhs Expenditure
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the expenditure per head in Scotland of (a) hospital and community health services, (b) general practitioner services, excluding the cost of prescriptions, (c) dental services, gross and net of charges and (d) general practitioner-prescribed prescriptions, in 1991–92.
Final information in respect of expenditure in 1991–92 will not be available until later in the year.
Assisted Areas
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland when he expects to make his statement concerning the revision of the assisted areas map of Scotland.
A review of the map was announced on 9 June by my right hon. Friend the Minister of State for Trade and Industry, Official Report, column 127. Copies of a consultation paper on the arrangements for the review and the criteria which will be taken into account in considering changes to the map have been placed in the Library. Copies of this paper have also been distributed to a range of interested bodies in Scotland. The closing date for responses to the consultation paper is 30 September 1992.
Strathclyde Buses
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the reason for the delay in making a decision on the management/employee buy-out of Strathclyde Buses; when he expects to announce his decision; and if he will make a statement.
Early in May my right hon. Friend received a request from Strathclyde regional council for consent to sell Strathclyde Buses Ltd to the company's management and employees. On 18 May there was a fire at Strathclyde Buses' Larkfield depot, Glasgow which destroyed the depot and a large number of buses. My right hon. Friend immediately sought clarification from the regional council about whether the vendors and prospective purchasers were content that the terms of the offer should remain unchanged. A response is awaited. A decision on the sale will he announced after the terms of the offer have been confirmed.
Disabled Employees
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many and what percentage of officers in grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, respectively, and overall in his Department are registered disabled people.
At 1 April 1992 there were two registered disabled officers at grade 6 level in my Department, which represents 1 per cent. of officers in that grade. The overall number of registered disabled staff was 89, which represents 1.4 per cent. of the total staff in post.
Civil Servants
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many civil servants are employed by the Scottish Office in (a) London and (b) Scotland.
[holding answer 24 June 1992]: At 1 April 1992 the number of civil servants employed by the Scottish Office excluding the Scottish prison service was 6,389, of whom 36 were located in London.
Ozone Depleting Chemicals
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will outline his Department's policy on recovery and recycling of ozone depleting chemicals.
[holding answer 22 June 1992]: The Scottish Office encourages industry and local authorities to recover and recycle CFCs. Some 29 authorities, representing 61 per cent. of the population of Scotland, have schemes for CFC recovery. New schemes identified by authorities in their expenditure plans are taken into account when setting their capital expenditure allocations each year. The public are also encouraged, in the recently published citizens' guide "Green Rights and Responsibilites in Scotland", to make use of council facilities for the safe removal of CFCs from old refrigerators. As a further measure it is intended to ban the supply of refrigerant in disposable containers.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland who has been appointed as a consultant to his Department for market testing.
[holding answer 29 June 1992]: In January 1992 Coopers and Lybrand Deloitte was engaged to provide assistance in drawing up a list of potential market testing candidates. That consultancy project finished in March 1992 and there are currently no consultants appointed for market testing.
Forestry
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will place in the Library a copy of the advice given by his Department in relation to tree planting in Strath Cuileannach, Sutherland, and its impact on agricultural activity.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: It is not the normal practice of my Department to publish correspondence relating to individual cases in the manner requested. However, the Scottish Office Agriculture and Fisheries Department was consulted by the Forestry Commission about the proposals to develop a new native pinewood at Strath Cuileannach and decided not to object to the proposals, subject to certain conditions regarding the boundaries of the scheme affecting the land retained for sheep farming. That decision was taken in accordance with the procedures and criteria for the release of agricultural land for forestry announced by the then Secretary of State for Scotland, in reply to a question from myself, on 24 October 1989.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what information is available to him from planting applications on the ownership of Strath Cuileannach, Sutherland.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: The application for grant aid for planting at Strath Cuileannach shows the land owned by Forest Farm Partnership.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list, by geographical area, the planting grants approved by the Forest Authority in each of the past three years.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: The areas of planting for which grants were paid in England, Wales and Scotland are shown in the Forestry Commission's 1989–90 and 1990–91 annual reports in table 2 of appendix XI in each case. Copies of these reports are available in the Library of the House. Similar information for 1991–92 will be included in the Commission's annual report to be published in the autumn. I have arranged for provisional figures for that year to be provided to the hon. Member and to be placed in the Library.
Employment
Disabled Employers
To ask the Secretary of State for Employment how many and what percentage of officers in grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7, respectively and overall in her Department are registered disabled people.
Information cannot be provided in the form requested but overall numbers were 1,688 registered disabled people (3.2 per cent.) at June 1991, the latest date for which figures are available. The Department also employs other people with disabilities who have chosen not to register.
Note
1. Staff working less than 10 hours per week are not included.
2. Staff working between 10 and 30 hours per week are counted as half staff units.
Travel To Interview Scheme
To ask the Secretary of State for Employment whether she will abolish the upper salary limit for the travel to interview scheme.
Questions on operational matters in the Employment Service Executive Agency are the responsibility of the agency's chief executive, to whom I have referred this question for reply.
Industrial Tribunals
To ask the Secretary of State for Employment what guidance she gives to employees about the entitlement of lay members of industrial tribunals to paid time off work for tribunal duties.
People who are invited to become industrial tribunal lay members are informed that they are entitled under legislation to reasonable time off work for tribunal duties. There is no entitlement under the law to paid time off for such duties.
To ask the Secretary of State for Employment what steps she is taking to increase the number of women serving as lay members on industrial tribunals.
My right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Employment, is anxious to increase the number of women serving on industrial tribunals as on other bodies, and we have taken steps to encourage suitable women to come forward for appointment from October 1992. Last year my predecessor, in asking bodies to nominate suitable candidates, stressed the desirability of increasing the number of women appointed. He also asked other bodies, including the Equal Opportunities Commission and the Women's National Commission to take what steps they could to encourage suitable women to apply. Officials in the Department organised a seminar for these bodies at which the need to encourage suitable women was stressed, and the information provided to interested inquirers and the press publicity about the appointment arrangements also emphasised this point.
To ask the Secretary of State for Employment what guidance she gives to lay members of industrial tribunals about the number of days they should expect to sit on tribunal duties.
Individuals who are offered appoint-ment to the panels of industrial tribunal lay members are told they may be asked to sit at least 15 days a year.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Employment if she will give a date when she will announce the areas of work in her Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
As promised in the White Paper, "Competing for Quality", departmental targets for market testing in 1992–93 will be announced later this year.
To ask the Secretary of State for Employment what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in her Department since November 1991.
I am unable to provide full-cost information.
To ask the Secretary of State for Employment what estimate she has made of savings in her Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
No such estimate has been made. The aim of market testing is to provide a better service to the customer as well as better value for money. We cannot predict in advance what the effect of the future market testing programme will be on the quality of service and costs, but we shall be looking for improvements in both.
Health
Pharmaceutical Information
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what are the regulations or guidelines which enable pharmaceutical companies to acquaint doctors with their products but preclude them from doing so in respect of nurses; and what plans she has to change these arrangements with the extension of limited prescribing powers to certain categories of nurses.
Regulations made under the Medicines Act 1968 do not preclude pharmaceutical companies from acquainting nurses with their products, although the advertising of prescription medicines which may be administered by nurses is confined to nursing journals. Regulations also provide that prescription medicines may be advertised to those who may lawfully prescribe them.
Professions Supplementary To Medicine Act
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list those professions which are covered by the Professions Supplementary to Medicine Act 1960; what plans she has to review the Act and to extend it to include further such professions; and if she will make a statement.
The Act currently covers chiropodists, dietitians, medical laboratory technicians, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, radiographers and orthoptists. Under section 10 of the Act, it is for the Council for Professions Supplementary to Medicine to propose any extension of its scope to other groups. There are no plans at present to review the Act.
Immunology
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list the numbers of consultant immunologists in each regional health authority, and the special health authorities, at the most recent available date.
The Department's September 1990 medical manpower census—the latest date for which figures are available centrally—records one consultant immunologist in each of the East Anglian and South West Thames regional health authorities and two consultant immunologists in the Hammersmith and Queen Charlotte's special health authority. Other immunologists with general medical responsibilities are likely to have been recorded under general medicine rather than immunology.
Nhs Expenditure
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what was the expenditure per head in each region and nationally of (a) hospital and community health services, (b) general practitioner services, excluding the cost of the prescriptions, (c) general dental services, gross and net dental charges and (d) general practitioner—prescribed prescriptions, for 1991–92.
Information derived from the 1991–92 annual accounts of health authorities and family health services authorities will he available in the autumn.
Abortion
To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what steps have been taken to ensure that her Department's guidelines and arrangements for counselling on abortion, have been followed in each district health authority;(2) if she will list the applications made by local authorities for the funding of pilot projects concerned with counselling on abortion as envisaged under health circular HC(77)26 together with the name of the health authority, the sum requested, the year of application, whether or not funding was granted and the sum granted.
Health circular (77)26 was issued in 1977 following the report of the Lane committee on the working of the Abortion Act 1967. The arrangements introduced at that time for funding training from central funds were designed to enhance existing local training facilities through pilot projects, if needed. The arrangements were not intended to be permanent or long-running. Records of take-up are no longer available. It is now the responsibility of local management to ensure that staff are properly trained in counselling skills where this is relevant to their work.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will give the number of inspections of each of the places approved for the purposes of section 1(3) of the Abortion Act 1967 since they were first approved under that section.
This information could be provided only at disproportionate cost. Once approval is given under section 1(3) of the Abortion Act 1967, those places using all of their beds for abortions are visited at least twice a year. Other approved places have at least one visit a year.
Factor 8
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will make a statement on the operation of the Medicines Act (Exemptions from Licences) (Importation) Order 1984—SI, 1984, No. 673—in relation to named patient arrangements for the supply of unlicensed factor 8 preparations and other unlicensed pharmaceutical products.
Applications for the import of unlicensed factor 8 as with all unlicensed medicines are subject to the provisions of SI 1984 No. 673—the Medicines (Exemption from Licences) (Importation) Order. This makes provision to meet a need for a particular product where there is no equivalent licensed product available on the United Kingdom market or if such a licence has been granted, the medicinal product is not in practice available.Sale or supply of exempted products is restricted to the conditions specified in the order.Each import exemption is limited to a quantity not exceeding that sufficient for 25 single administrations or for 25 courses of treatment not exceeding three months.In deciding whether or not to allow importation the Medicines Control Agency considers: the facilities and conditions relating to manufacture, the quality of material being imported and whether the medicinal product can be regarded as a product which can be safely administered to human beings or whether the product is of satisfactory quality for such administration.
Cervical Cancer
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the efficacy of the current test for screening for cervical cancer; and what action she is taking to reduce the number of tests which prove negative when cancer is present.
The effectiveness of the "pap" smear test for cervical cancer screening has been demonstrated by experience in Canada, the Grampian region and Nordic countries with noteworthy decreases in the incidence and mortality due to cervical cancer.The Department advised health authorities in health circular HC(88)1, a copy of which is available in the Library, of the recommendation for a comprehensive education programme to train doctors and nurses in how to take satisfactory smears. In order to ensure that there are continuing improvements in laboratory standards when processing smears, the Department issued guidance on a protocol for a proficiency testing scheme in gynaecological cytopathology for laboratory staff. This advised of the need for regional cytopathology external quality assurance groups and the Department set up a national co-ordinating committee to promote accuracy in reporting smear test results.
Aids
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what advice her Department's chief medical officer has given the public about sexual activity involving an individual suffering with HIV or AIDS; what is the latest estimate of the risk of contracting the disease when a condom is(a) used and (b) not used; and if she will make a statement.
Data are available from the results of "The European Study Group on Heterosexual Transmission of HIV", published in March 1992, a copy of which is available in the Library. Couples where one partner was already infected with HIV were followed up six-monthly. Among 44 couples using condoms intermittently, six women were infected with HIV. No partners were infected in 24 couples using condoms consistently.The AIDS public education campaign has encouraged the use of condoms as a means of protection against HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.
Ultraviolet Radiation
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what advice her Department has received from the expert advisory Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment regarding ultraviolet radiation and health.
In response to a recent request from the United Kingdom Health Departments, COMARE has now furnished advice on ultraviolet radiation (UV) and adverse health effects in the context of existing public health advice on minimising UV exposure, and the need for further research. In particular, COMARE was asked to consider its advice against a background of evidence of a raised incidence of skin cancer in the United Kingdom and recent concerns about changes in solar UV levels secondary to possible changes in the stratospheric ozone layer.COMARE concludes that there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that skin cancer incidence is related to exposure to UV radiation, and that risk is determined largely by patterns of exposure to existing levels of solar UV radiation, which is influenced by people's lifestyle. The committee makes a number of recommendations relating to additional public health advice on minimising exposure to natural and artificial sources of UV, and on common standards for consumer information for sunglasses and sunscreen products. The Government accept the committee's recommendations and the Health Departments are considering urgently how best to implement them. The Government note COMARE's intention to consider research needs further in the light of relevant research currently under way or planned.The Government are grateful to COMARE for its work in this area and looks forward to receiving further advice on research needs. Following is the full text of the committee's advice:Statement of advice from COMARE to Health Departments
Health effects of ultra violet radiation
INTRODUCTION
1. The United Kingdom Health Departments have asked COMARE to consider the adverse health effects of UV radiation (UVR) in relation to existing public health advice on minimising UV exposure, and the need for further research. This has been considered against a background of:
HEALTH EFFECTS
2. The Committee have noted with concern that there has been a 50 per cent. increase in the incidence of malignant melanoma in England and Wales (1,827 cases in 1980 rising to 2,635 cases in 1986). The much more common, although seldom fatal, forms of skin cancer which are grouped as non-melanotic skin cancers (NMSC) increased from 19,000 cases in 1980 to over 25,000 cases in 1986. We consider that this rising incidence of skin cancers constitutes a public health problem in the United Kingdom. Other health effects are known to be associated with excessive exposure to UVR, and additional research is needed in these areas.
3. We consider that there is sufficient evidence to show that skin cancer incidence is related to exposure to UV radiation and that risk is determined largely by patterns of exposure to existing levels of solar UV radiation which is influenced by people's occupation and behaviour. The risk however, varies with the degree of skin pigmentation, being greatest in the skin type with red hair and fair skin which does not tan.
CANCER REGISTRATION
4. The Committee reiterates its view that skin cancer registration procedures should be improved so that the statistics can he updated more regularly. It was recognised by the working party chaired by Professor Eva Alberman which reported last year on the national cancer registration scheme (Series MB1 No. 17) that better and more timely figures were required. Many of the working party's 17 recommendations are currently being taken forward by the cancer registries in the regional health authorities and by the NHS information management group in the Department. COMARE has previously expressed its support for this review.
SOLAR MONITORING
5. The Committee note that the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) set up three experimental solar UV monitoring stations in the United Kingdom in 1988, and that the instrumentation of these units has subsequently been improved. We acknowledge the value of these measurements in providing baseline data for any changes which may occur in the future. We welcome the NRPB proposal to extend this scheme to latitudes further north and south to provide a more comprehensive picture of the terrestrial solar UV levels over United Kingdom latitudes.
6. The Committee note the widespread concerns about long term stratospheric ozone depletion and support the initiatives already being taken by the signatories to the Montreal Protocol to reduce the release of ozone-depleting chemicals into the atmosphere.
7. We note that seasonal variations in solar UV levels, and short term variations due to cloud cover and local weather, are far in excess of any long term UV changes currently anticipated as a result of stratospheric ozone depletion. For this reason it would not be helpful to publish daily information on solar UVR levels; such retrospective information would be of little practical value. It should be recognised that currently the most important factor in a person's exposure to solar UVR is lifestyle and we recommend that there is a need to inform the public of the risks of excessive exposure to sunlight.
RESEARCH REQUIREMENTS
8. We consider that considerable additional scientific information on the health effects of UV is required to enable a more accurate assessment of the various aspects of health risk and to facilitate effective targeting of public health education (see 10 below). Whilst a clear association between non-melanotic skin cancer and cumulative UV exposure has been demonstrated, the relationship between UV exposure and malignant melanoma trends needs further consideration. We will consider further research needs in the light of ongoing work, in particular the work of the NRPB Advisory Group on non-ionising radiations.
PUBLIC HEALTH ADVICE
9. We endorse the general content and basis of existing health advice as set out in the Health Education Authority leaflet ("Are you dying to get a suntan?"), and agree that there is a need to reinforce certain important aspects. In particular the Committee recommend that there is a need to advise about the potential longterm dangers of sunburn to children and babies, and to emphasise the need for individuals to develop a better awareness of their own skin's sensitivity to solar UVR, hearing in mind the very great variation in sensitivity which exists between different members of the population.
10. We fully endorse the Health Department's proposal to reinforce existing public health advice on UV, and to consider the specific health advice given to users of sunbeds/sunlamps and tungsten halogen lamps and recommend that this he taken forward urgently. We also support proposals to consider the application of common standards to consumer information for sunglasses and suntan products. The Committee wish to he kept fully informed of progress in these areas.
Herbicides
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will outline the possible effects of human consumption of the pesticides atrazine and simazine.
No adverse health effects have been detected in humans from the approved United Kingdom agricultural and non-agricultural uses of these herbicides. In some experiments where doses hundreds of times the highest estimated human intake in the United Kingdom have been fed to laboratory rats, the incidence of mammary tumours was increased.The independent and statutory Advisory Committee on Pesticides has confirmed that the levels of atrazine and simazine found in some drinking water supplies in the United Kingdom do not endanger the health of consumers. Residues of these chemicals have not been found in food crops.The United Kingdom has a legal obligation to comply with the European Community's drinking water directive —80/778/EEC—which sets very stringent limits on non-toxicological grounds, and restrictions on the use of both these herbicides were announced in May 1992. Approvals for non-crop use, which is the main source of water contamination, will he revoked on 31 August 1993 and further restrictions will apply to all other uses from the same date.
Ambulance Services
To ask the Secretary of State for Health which ambulance stations have been closed in Greater Manchester over the last three months; how many times; and for how long.
This information is not held centrally. The hon. Member may wish to contact Mr. E. S. Schofield, the chairman of Bury health authority, which is responsible for the management of the Greater Manchester ambulance service.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will make it her policy to answer questions on the running of the ambulance service.
NHS ambulance services are contracted to provide patient transport services by purchasing health authorities which are responsible for the delivery of those services. Ambulance service policy is a matter for Ministers.
General Practitioner Beds
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if it remains Government policy, as set out by the then Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health in a letter to the hon. Member for Twickenham on 25 July 1990, that Teddington memorial hospital and the general practitioner beds within it have a secure future for as long as general practitioners and patients continue to want to use them; if the Richmond, Twickenham and Roehampton district health authority has been made aware that this is Government policy; if she will ask the authority to comply; and if she will inform the hon. Member for Twickenham of the result.
I have recently visited Teddington memorial hospital.All health authorities are obliged to consider carefully the health needs of their population and should ensure that in contracting for health services, both acute and in the community, they have consulted local people including, for example, GPs.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what is the occupancy rate for the 27 general practitioner beds at the Teddington memorial hospital; and what representations she has received from general practitioners, and from the applicants for trust status concerning the demand for continuation of provision of general practitioner beds.
Information on bed occupancy rates is not collected centrally.Local GPs and staff at Teddington memorial have written to Ministers expressing their concern about the provision of general practitioner beds. I will reply shortly.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what powers she has to require a district health authority acting as a purchasing authority to provide for the purchase of general practitioner beds where there is clear evidence of demand from general practitioners and their patients.
District health authorities are expected to purchase a wide range of health services for their local populations. The level and type of services purchased are for the authorities themselves to determine in the light of local needs and priorities.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in her Department since November 1991.
The estimated cost of the market-testing initiative in the Department since November 1991 is in the order of £150,000.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate she has made of savings in her Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
No such estimate has been made.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will give a date when she will announce the areas of work in her Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster gave my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridgeshire, South-East (Mr. Paice) on 22 June, column 102.
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Equal Opportunities
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many and what percentage of officers in grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 respectively and overall in his Department are women.
The information is set out in the table, being non-industrial staff in post on 29 June 1992 in MAFF and its agencies. (Part-time staff are counted as 0.5).
| Female staff in post | ||
| Grade/grade equivalent | Number | Percentage |
| 1 | 0.;0 | 0.;0 |
| 2 | 1.;0 | 12.;5 |
| 3 | 2.;0 | 7.;7 |
| 4 | 0.;0 | 0.;0 |
| 5 | 11.;0 | 9.;2 |
| 6 | 11.;5 | 7.;1 |
| 7 | 137.;5 | 14.;7 |
| 163.;0 | 12.;9 | |
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is his latest estimate of the likely future incidence of BSE; when he expects the outbreak to peak and at what level; and when he now expects the disease to disappear in the United Kingdom.
It is impossible to predict accurately the future incidence of BSE since it is not known how many cattle received sufficient inefective agent in feed to cause disease. Nevertheless, 1992 is expected to be the peak year in relation to the number of confirmed cases. And all the evidence continues to show that the ruminant feed ban, introduced in July 1988, is the key measure which will ultimately lead to the eradication of BSE. It is not expected that the effect of the ban will be reflected in a decline in the annual total number of cases until next year. Thereafter it is expected that there will be a clear downward trend until the ultimate disappearance of the disease, possibly by the end of the 1990s.
Bovine Somatotropin
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on the use of bovine somatotropin in the United Kingdom after 1992.
Within the Community the use of BST except in authorised field trials is banned until the end of 1993. The Commission is obliged to present a report including appropriate proposals for subsequent arrangements before 30 June 1993.
Clenbuterol
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, pursuant to this answer of 19 June, Official Report, column 685, if he will list the number of cases, of which the Department are aware, of beef cattle fed with the drug clenbuterol entering the United Kingdom and their country of origin.
None.
Herbicides
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on the uses of the pesticides atrazine and simazine.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given on 21 May, Official Report, col. 252.
Abattoirs
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he will be able to tell abattoir owners whether their applications for derogation from upgrading their plants to EC standards have been successful.
The Department's veterinary officers are currently in the process of visiting all fresh meat premises seeking derogations in order to upgrade to the new EC structural standards. Before a derogation can be granted, a detailed work plan must be agreed between the plant and the Department. This work is proceeding as quickly as possible and owners will be informed individually about the outcome of their derogation applications.
Market Testing
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
The full cost of the market testing initiative in the Department since November 1991 has been £44,000.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster to my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridgeshire, South-East (Mr. Paice), on 22 June 1992, Official Report. col. 102.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
No such forward estimate has been made.
Grass-Growing Machines
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what research he has undertaken into the effectiveness of hydroponic grass-growing machines as a provider of food for stabled horses.
None.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations his Department has received in respect of the quality and effectiveness of hydroponic grass-growing machines.
I am not aware of any representations on this matter.
Disabled Employees
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many and what percentage of officers in grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 respectively and overall in his Department are registered disabled people.
The information set out as at 29 June 1992 relates to MAFF staff and its agencies. Part-time staff are counted as 0.5. Figures have been aggregated to preserve individuals' confidentiality.
| Registered disabled | ||
| Grade/Grade equivalent | Number | Percentage |
| 1–7 | 4 | 0.;3 |
Agriculture Council
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on the outcome of the Agriculture Council held on 30 June.
I represented the United Kingdom at this meeting of the Council.The regulations implementing the Council's decisions of 21 May on common agricultural policy reform and on 1992–93 farm prices were formally adopted. Despite pressure from some delegations, no changes were made to the agreement. The Commission made a number of declarations on subjects of concern to particular delegations, but these do not commit the United Kingdom or the Council.
Trade And Industry
Subsidiarity
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what definition of subsidiarity was used in the discussions between EC regional policy Ministers in Lisbon on 15–16 May.
I represented the United Kingdom at this meeting. No precise definition of subsidiarity was used. However, subsidiarity is generally defined in the Community context as the principle that the Community should take action only when objectives cannot be achieved at the level of individual member states acting alone, and that such action should not exceed the minimum necessary to achieve those objectives.
Internal Market Council
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will list the matters to be discussed at the next meeting of the EC Internal Market Council; and if he will make a statement.
I will chair the next Internal Market Council on 22 September.The agenda will not be finalised until early September.
Telephone Faults
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what discussions he has had with Oftel on the priority telephone fault repair service for the disabled; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend and I meet the Director General of OFTEL from time to time to discuss a wide range of telecommunications issues. He fully shares the Government's view of the importance of a free priority fault repair service for those disabled customers whose lives depend on having constant telephone access to outside medical help.
Accidents At Home
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what representations he has received from the toy industry regarding delays in publication of statistics for accidents in the home.
No representations have been received from the toy industry regarding delays in the publication of statistics on accidents in the home.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will list the hospitals surveyed by his Department for the production of statistics on accidents in the home.
The hospitals currently collecting data for the home accident surveillance system (HASS) are as follows:
- North Tees general hospital, Stockton-on-Tees
- Luton and Dunstable hospital, Luton
- Skegness and District hospital, Skegness
- Selly Oak hospital, Birmingham
- Prince Charles hospital, Merthyr Tydfil
- Royal Berkshire hospital, Reading
- Mount Vernon hospital, Hillingdon
- Macclesfield district general, Macclesfield
- Manor hospital, Nuneaton
- William Harvey hospital, Ashford, Kent
- Blackburn royal infirmary, Blackburn
- Daisy Hill hospital, Newry, Co. Down
- Monklands district hospital, Airdrie
- Kings Collegee hospital, Denmark Hill
- Hereford general hospital, Hereford
- Queen Mary's university hospital, Roehampton
- Airedale general hospital, Keighley
- Bournemouth general hospital, Bournemouth
- NB The North Devon district hospital, Barnstaple will replace William Harvey hospital in November 1992.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade when he expects to publish statistics for accidents in the home for the years 1990 and 1991.
The target dates for publication of the Department's home accident surveillance system statistics for the years specified are as follows:
- 1990: October 31 1992
- 1991: July 31 1993
Ec Regulations
To ask the President of the Board of Trade how many EC regulations have been introduced this year which apply to matters covered by his Department.
For the year, up to and including the 19 June 1992, some 36 EC regulations were introduced for which the Department of Trade and Industry has overall responsibility.
Trade Statistics
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what was the annual output, United Kingdom market size and trade balance for activity headings 3301, 3302, 3441, 3443, 3453, and 3454 for each complete year from 1987.
| Balance of Trade | ||||||
| SIC1 | 3301 | 3302 | 3441 | 3443 | 3453 | 3454 |
| £ millions | ||||||
| 1987 | -340 | -548 | -276 | 146 | -584 | -731 |
| 1988 | -25 | -891 | -351 | 321 | -794 | -821 |
| 1989 | 23 | -1,365 | -238 | 157 | -848 | -819 |
| 1990 | 103 | -1,322 | -162 | 234 | -601 | -509 |
| 1991 | 170 | -1,045 | -123 | 198 | -677 | -257 |
| 1Standard Industrial Classification (1980): | ||||||
| 3301 Office machinery. | ||||||
| 3302 Electronic data processing equipment. | ||||||
| 3441 Telegraph and telephone equipment. | ||||||
| 3443 Radio and electronic capital goods. | ||||||
| 3453 Electronic sub-assemblies and active components. | ||||||
| 3454 Electronic consumer goods and miscellaneous equipment. | ||||||
| 2Sales of principal products of each industry. | ||||||
| 3Home demand = Sales + Imports - Exports. | ||||||
| Data not available. | ||||||
| Data source: CSO. | ||||||
Trans-European Networks
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what are the implications of the proposals for Trans-European networks contained in articles 129b, c and d of the treaty on European union for equalisation on harmonisation of the relevant system costs, or costs to the consumers or users of such designated networks.
Action by the Community on Trans-European Networks in energy telecommunications and transport, provided for in articles 129b to 129d of the treaty on European union, is to be aimed at promoting interconnection and inter-operability of national networks within a framework of open and competitive markets. If the Community succeeds in encouraging larger and more liberalised networks, this can be expected to lead to greater competition and thus to bring prices for consumers and users more closely into line with costs.
Mersey Barrage
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what financial assistance was given from public funds by Her Majesty's Government towards the Travers Morgan economic study for the Mersey Barrage Company; and what percentage that was of the total cost.
The information is shown in the table.
| Sales2 | ||||||
| SIC1 | 3301 | 3302 | 3441 | 3443 | 3453 | 3454 |
| £millions | ||||||
| 1987 | 268 | 4,352 | 1,669 | 2,958 | 1,168 | 1,079 |
| 1988 | 270 | 5,229 | 1,970 | 3,189 | 1,335 | 1,199 |
| 1989 | 295 | 5,695 | 2,137 | 3,171 | 1,487 | 1,203 |
| 1990 | 251 | 6,388 | 1,883 | 3,335 | 1,619 | 1,501 |
| 1991 | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | |
| Home demand3 | ||||||
| SIC1 | 3301 | 3302 | 3441 | 3443 | 3453 | 3454 |
| £millions | ||||||
| 1987 | 607 | 4,900 | 1,945 | 2,812 | 1,752 | 1,810 |
| 1988 | 295 | 6,120 | 2,321 | 2,868 | 2,129 | 2,020 |
| 1989 | 272 | 7,059 | 2,374 | 3,013 | 2,334 | 2,023 |
| 1990 | 147 | 7,710 | 2,045 | 3,101 | 2,220 | 2,010 |
| 1991 | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. |
The Government's contribution to the Travers Morgan Economic study for the Mersey Barrage Company was £77,391.50. This was 50 per cent. of the total cost of that study.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what guidance he has given to the Mersey Barrage Company on cost benefit analysis, including the likely environmental costs, in assessing the viability of any future barrage scheme.
The Mersey Barrage Company commissioned the consultants Travers Morgan Economics to undertake a cost benefit analysis of the Mersey barrage. The methodology adopted for assessing environmental costs reflected the consultant's views, at that time, of the most appropriate valuation mechanism. The analysis included an evaluation of the cost of creating lost habitat for wildfowl and some plants caused by the Barrage scheme. The Mersey Barrage Company has discussed these costs with its Environmental working party, which includes statutory organisations and environmental interest groups. Government officials have been in discussion with the Mersey Barrage Company on the methodology and results of the cost benefit analysis. The Government consider a proper assessment of the environmental impact of the barrage a key issue in appraising the scheme.
Nuclear Power
To ask the President of the Board of Trade how much of the depleted uranium stockpiled at civil nuclear facilities has been re-enriched for use in United Kingdom or foreign nuclear programmes since 1955.
Over 15,000 tonnes of depleted uranium from the reprocessing of magnox irradiated fuel have been enriched for use in civil nuclear fuel.
Sub-Sahara Africa
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what was the total value of exports to sub-Saharan Africa during 1990; if he will give a breakdown of the main items; and what was the total value of United Kingdom exports and imports from sub-Saharan Africa during 1990 and for the latest year for which figures are available.
Details of trade with sub-Saharan Africa are published in the overseas trade statistics of the United Kingdom.
Coal Privatisation
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what expressions of interest he has received from potential purchasers of British Coal; and if he wil make a statement.
A number of unions and companies have expressed an interest in purchasing all or part of the coal industry. It is a matter for the organisations themselves whether they wish their interest to be made public.
Regional Assistance
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what has been the level of the United Kingdom's receipts from the European regional fund of the European Community in each year since 1985; and what is the total size of the ERF in the same period.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]:European regional development fund receipts since 1985 are shown in the table.
| European regional development fund receipts | |||
| Total Ec mecu | United Kingdom mecu | Percentage share | |
| 1985 | 1,624 | 484 | 29.8 |
| 1986 | 2,484 | 507 | 20.4 |
| 1987 | 2,535 | 527 | 20.8 |
| 1988 | 3,093 | 578 | 18.7 |
| 1989 | 3,920 | 612 | 15.6 |
| 1990 | 4,554 | 465 | 10.2 |
| 1991 | 5,181 | 483 | 9.3 |
Timeshare
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if the Director General of Fair Trading will examine the suitability of William Montgomery, director of International Resort Sales and Travel Ltd., to hold a credit licence.
Consumer credit licensing is the responsi-bility of the Director General of Fair Trading and I will draw the hon. Member's question to his attention.
Instruments Of Torture
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he has any plans to tighten restrictions governing the granting of permits to export components which can be used as instruments of torture; and if he will make a statement.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply that I gave to the hon. Member for Roxburgh and Berwickshire (Mr. Kirkwood) on 18 May 1992, Official Report, column 22.
Market Testing
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what has been the total cost so far of the market testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
An estimate of the total cost since November 1991 is not available.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market testing programme.
No such estimate has been made.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
As promised in the White Paper, "Competing for Quality", departmental targets for market testing in 1992–93 will be announced later this year.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade who has been appointed as a consultant to his Department for market testing.
[holding answer 29 June 1992]: No such appointment has been made.
Coal Industry
To ask the President of the Board of Trade whether, following the special arrangements for Britain arrived at on the EC working time directives, the Government intend to proceed with the repeal of the Coal Miners Regulations Act 1908.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: We do not envisage repealing the 1908 Act until the proposed EC directive has been implemented.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what changed working practices British Coal have negotiated with representatives of its work force since the passage of the Coal Industry Act 1992.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: This is a matter for British Coal.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what support he has given to promoting United Kingdom investment in the Colombian state-owned coal-mining industry.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: My Department held a seminar in London on 29 April to draw energy opportunities in Colombia, including investment opportunities, to the attention of United Kingdom industry.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he intends to provide Government support for British Coal's anti-dumping claim against Colombian coal imported initially into the EC and then into the United Kingdom.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: The Government raised no objection to the European Commission opening an investigation into British Coal's anti-dumping complaint because it is only by investigation that the full facts of the matter can be established. It is now for the Commission to decide whether the allegations in the complaint are such that an investigation is warranted.
Inmos
To ask the President of the Board of Trade (1) if he will list the dates of all approaches he has made to M. Carpentier, head of D.G. XIII of the European Commission, concerning the threatened closure of Inmos;(2) if he will list the dates of contacts he has initiated with D.G. XVI of the European Commission, concerning the threatened closure of Inmos;(3) what discussions he has had with the European Commission on any proposal to relocate Inmos to another site in the United Kingdom;(4) if he will list the dates and outcome of all contacts and meetings he has had with each directorate of the European Commission on the future of Inmos.
[holding answer 29 June 1992]: Discussions took place on 10 June with the Commission about Inmos's request for a £30 million grant to support its proposed £60 million investment in Newport.This request far exceeds the level of support we would normally consider for investment projects in the Newport area. The Commission has however made it clear that there can be no prospect of United Kingdom Government aid at the level sought, and the company has been told.Although I am not aware of any proposals by the company to locate elsewhere in the United Kingdom, we remain ready to discuss matters with it.
Brazilian Mahogany
To ask the President of the Board of Trade how many cubic metres of Brazilian mahogany were imported into the United Kingdom in 1991.
[holding answer 29 June 1992]: The only information which relates to mahogany imported from Brazil is that which has been sawn or chipped lengthwise, sliced or peeled, of a thickness exceeding 6mm, defined as code 440723901 of the Standard International Trade Classification, Revision 3. Under this heading there were 45,762 cubic metres of mahogany imported into the United Kingdom from Brazil in 1991.
Nuclear Power
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will ensure that a public inquiry will be held before Nuclear Electric is allowed to build the proposed Sizewell C.
[holding answer 29 June 1992]: On 9 November 1989 the Secretary of State for Energy informed the House that no capital expenditure approval would be given to Nuclear Electric plc. for any new nuclear station beyond Sizewell B pending the outcome of a review of the future prospects for nuclear power in the United Kingdom, which will be undertaken in 1994. That remains the position.It also remains the case that, before reaching his decision on any application for his consent to construct and operate an electricity generating station my right hon. Friend is obliged to hold a public inquiry into the application of a relevant local planning authority has objected to it.If there is no objection from a relevant local planning authority, my right hon. Friend may still call for a public inquiry to be held at his own discretion.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will place in the Library copies of all correspondence since 1990 between himself or his predecessor, and the chairmen of (a) Nuclear Electric. (b) British Nuclear Fuels plc. and (c) the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority on the matter of future development plans of each organisation.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: I meet the chairmen of these companies regularly to discuss a range of issues. Future development plans are commercial matters for the companies concerned.
Steel
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will make a statement concerning his policy to encourage the export of steel products.
[holding answer 30 June 1992]: My Department supports the export efforts of the steel industry—as of British industry as a whole—by providing, through the Overseas Trade Services, a comprehensive range of information, advice, services and practical assistance.The United Kingdom is keen to secure an effective multilateral steel agreement and supports the European Commission efforts to resume talks on the outstanding issues.
Defence
Air Force Training
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) if he will make a statement on the outcome of the Euro-NATO training group consideration of alternative means of meeting NATO air force training requirements following the abandonment of plans for a NATO tactical fighter training centre;(2) if he will make a statement on his future plans for provision of training for RAF strike/attack units following the abandonment of plans for a NATO tactical fighter training centre.
Although there are no plans at present to continue with the NATO tactical fighter training centre, the project has not been abandoned. The partner nations of the Euro-NATO training group, including the United Kingdom, continue to investigate alternative means of meeting training requirements. Training for RAF strike/attack units will continue mainly in the United Kingdom, but with regular participation in NATO, North American and other overseas exercises.
Low Flying
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many operational low-flying movements have been authorised in each of the tactical training areas in each month since June 1991.
The information requested is as follows:
| Northern Scotland | Central Wales | Borders | |
| 1991 | |||
| June | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| July | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| August | 0 | 7 | 0 |
| September | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| October | 54 | 0 | 38 |
| November | 47 | 18 | 188 |
| December | 85 | 3 | 382 |
| 1992 | |||
| January | 70 | 2 | 141 |
| February | 99 | 21 | 361 |
| March | 271 | 7 | 263 |
| April | 57 | 8 | 187 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many complaints about low flying were received from addresses located within each of the numbered low-flying areas in the United Kingdom during 1991.
The information requested is as follows:
| Low flying areas | Numbers of complaints or inquiries |
| 1 | 62 |
| 2 | 735 |
| 3 | 21 |
| 4 | 320 |
| 5 | 430 |
| 6 | 292 |
| 7 | 791 |
| 8 | 230 |
| 9 | 16 |
| 11 | 424 |
| 12 | 160 |
| 13 | 15 |
| 14 | 352 |
| 16 | 291 |
| 17 | 466 |
| 18 | 204 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many low-flying sorties were carried out in each low-flying area in the United Kingdom in each month since January 1991.
Records are not kept of the number of low-flying sorties carried out in each low-flying area in the United Kingdom. The total number of sorties flown from January 1991 to April 1992, the most recent months for which figures are available, is 173,470.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many low-flying sorties were carried out by Royal Air Force aircraft from Canadian forces base Goose Bay in (a) 1990 and (b) 1991; and if he will provide a breakdown of the figures by aircraft type.
The information requested is as follows:
| Aircraft Type | 1990 | 1991 |
| Tornado GRI | 819 | 481 |
| Tornado F3 | 82 | 0 |
| Harrier | 14 | 4 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many low-flying sorties have been flown by (a) RAF Tornado strike/attack aircraft, and (b) RAF Tornado F3 aircraft, during each Distant Frontier exercise in Alaska since 1990.
The information requested is:
| Number of Sorties | |
| 1990 | |
| Tornado G1 | 41 |
| 1992 | |
| Tornado GR1 | 160 |
| Tornado F3 | 75 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence by what height and lateral distance military aircraft are instructed to avoid the village of Dalmellington.
It is not our practice to release detailed information on flying restrictions in individual areas.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what agreements have been reached with the United States of America authorities concerning (a) the use of existing weapons and electronic warfare ranges and low-level training routes and (b) the provision of additional weapons, electronic warfare and low-level training facilities, for use by Royal Air Force aircraft deployed to Eielson air force base, Alaska.
Royal Air Force deployments to Eielson air force base, Alaska have been at the invitation of the United States air force. The invitations granted specified use of weapons and electronic warfare ranges and designated low-level training routes and areas. Possible future deployments are being considered with the United States authorities.
Raf Trainer
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on his Department's requirement for a basic flight trainer for the Royal Air Force, showing the scale and nature of the requirement, the timetable for procurement, the aircraft which it is designed to replace, and the approximate overall cost of the programme.
Basic flying training in the RAF is undertaken by all trainee pilots, prior to their undertaking more specialised training in other, fixed-wing aircraft or helicopters. At present, flying training is carried out in either Jet Provost or Tucano aircraft, which are currently replacing the remaining Jet Provost. We expect this replacement to be completed before the end of next year, by which time we will have taken 130 Tucano aircraft into service at an overall cost of some £150 million. We expect the Tucano to meet the RAF's basic flying training requirement until well after the turn of the century.
Stand-Off Missile
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on his Department's requirement for a conventionally armed stand-off missile, showing the scale and nature of the requirement, the timetable for procurement, the weapon systems which it is designed to replace, and the approximate overall cost of the programme.
We have sought the views of industry on the proposals for conventionally armed, air-launched, stand-off missile to complement the JP233. These responses are currently being assessed. No procurement decisions have been taken.
Psychiatric Services
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how many service personnel received help from the armed forces psychiatric services, or were referred to the national health service psychiatric services, in each year for the last 10 years. other than in respect of the Gulf war;(2) how many service personnel received help from the armed forces psychiatric services, or were referred to the national health service psychiatric services, as a consequence of the Gulf war.
Information in the form requested is not held centrally. The numbers of psychiatric treatment episodes in the armed forces, which covers all treatments involving a discharge from a medical unit, in the 10-year period to 1991, are as follows:
| Number | |
| 1982 | 1,109 |
| 1983 | 1,166 |
| 1984 | 1,031 |
| 1985 | 1,081 |
| 1986 | 1,041 |
| 11987 | 1,131 |
| 1988 | 1,151 |
| 1989 | 1,204 |
| 1990 | 1,182 |
| 21991 | 31,126 |
| 1 Figures prior to 1987 do not include one day cases. | |
| 2 1991 figures are provisional. | |
| 3 Includes 68 episodes related to the Gulf War. | |
Defence Export Services Organisation
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many staff of the Defence Export Services Organisation are engaged in the administration of the Al Yamamah and Anglo-Malaysian defence exports contracts.
A total of 230 staff are engaged in the administration of the Al Yamamah programme, and 24 in the Malaysian project. These offices arc separately established and operate on a self financing basis; the numbers are therefore in addition to those I gave to the hon. Member for Newham, North-West (Mr. Banks) on 18 June, Official Report, column 671.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many staff of the Defence Export Services Organisation are engaged on the administration of the International Military Services organisation.
There are none.
War Crimes
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many files relating to war crimes in the Channel Islands during world war two are retained in his Department and withheld from the Public Record Office.
We have been unable to identify any such files which are retained under the Public Records Act.
Equal Opportunities
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many and what percentage of officers in grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 respectively and overall in his Department are women.
As at 1 May 1992, excluding staff in executive agencies, the information requested is as follows:
| Number | Percentage of staff in grade | |
| Grade 1 | 0 | — |
| Grade 2 | 0 | — |
| Grade 3 | 11 | 2 |
| Grade 4 | 0 | — |
| Grade 5 | 7 | 3 |
| Grade 6 | 8 | 2 |
| Grade 7 | 56 | 3 |
| Total non-industrial staff | 80,574 | — |
| Total female non-industrial staff | 32,623 | 40 |
| Total industrial staff | 50,895 | — |
| Total female industrial staff | 9,601 | 19 |
| Total staff | 131,469 | — |
| Total female staff | 42,224 | 32 |
| 1 On loan from HM Customs and Excise. | ||
New Navy Ship
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make it his policy for a forthcoming ship in the Royal Navy to be named after the city of Portsmouth.
The ships names and badges committee has considered the name of Portsmouth, but it has not found favour on account of possible confusion, in communications, between the name of the ship and the naval base.
Nuclear Arsenals
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the implications for the future size of the United Kingdom nuclear arsenal of the recent agreement between the United States and Russian Presidents to implement reductions in their respective nuclear arsenals.
We will continue to retain only the minimum nuclear deterrent required for our security needs.
Troops
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence to which Vote the cost of sending additional troops to Northern Ireland at the request of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland is debited.
The cost is borne on class I, vote 1, personnel costs, support and other services; vote 2, defence procurement and vote 4, works services.
Housing
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to his answer on 2 June to the hon. Member for Knowsley, North, (Mr. Howarth), Official Report, column 529, what is the nature and type of short-term steps that he is taking to provide assistance to those who find themselves in housing difficulty; and how many personnel have found themselves in housing difficulty.
I refer the hon. Member to a note entitled "Servicemen's Housing: The Work of the Housing Task Force", a copy of which is in the Library. As well as the measures detailed in this note, the joint service housing advice office was set up in May at Old Sarum to provide advice on a range of housing matters to service personnel. To date, 128 requests have been received for help or information.
Expenditure
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the current information presented in the Statement on the Defence Estimates provides information on defence expenditures on the basis of the categories set out in the United Nations document "Instrument for Standardised International Reporting of Military Expenditures"; and if he will make a statement.
Information provided to the United Nations on defence expenditures is on the basis of categories designed to meet the United Nations's reporting requirements, which differ from those used in the current "Statement on the Defence Estimates"—SDE. There are no plans to adopt the United Nations categorisation for future SDE's although we will continue to review the public presentation of data, as the new management strategy develops, with a view to providing the greatest possible visibility of the defence programme.
Vienna Document 1992
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has to implement the provisions of the Vienna document 1992; and if he will make a statement.
The Vienna Document 1992 came into force on 1 May 1992. We will comply fully with its provisions, as we did for the Vienna Document 1990 which it has succeeded.
Limited Strikes
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what recent discussions he has had with his United States counterpart relating to the global protection against limited strikes programme.
The Government remain in close touch with the United States Administration on their proposal for limited ballistic missile defences.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what account he has taken of the recent agreements between Russia and the United States of America to reduce stocks of nuclear weapons in the formation of his policy towards United Kingdom participation in a global protection against limited strikes system.
The United State's concept for protection against limited ballistic missile strikes is concerned not with existing deterrent forces, except in the case of accidental or unauthorised launch, but with new risks from instability and proliferation. We support this objective.
Ballistic Missile Attacks
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the requirement for protection against ballistic missile attack for (a) British territory and (b) British forces overseas; and if he will make a statement.
We continue to keep the requirement for defence against ballistic missiles under review, in consultation with the US and other NATO allies.
Air Defence
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what comparative studies his Department is carryying out on the role of surface-to-air missiles and fighter aircraft in the air defence of the United Kingdom.
My Department is currently studying the most cost-effective mix of fighters and surface-to-air missiles for United Kingdom air defence. This work is taking into account all relevant factors including the effect of possible counter-measures.
Vehicle Electronics Research
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement about the vehicle electronics research defence initiative.
This is a matter for the Defence Research Agency—DRA—under its framework document. I have asked the chief executive of the DRA to write to the hon. and learned Member.
Special Operations Vehicle
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when he intends to place an order for the special operations vehicle recently launched by Land-Rover.
My Department has no plans to place an order for the Land-Rover special operations vehicle at this time.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what has been the total cost so far of the market-testing initiative in his Department since November 1991.
The market-testing initiative is being pursued as part of the Department's on-going work on efficiency. Its costs cannot be separately identified.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has made of savings in his Department as a result of the market-testing programme.
The MOD's market-testing programme has existed since 1979. Since then, market testing and private sector contracting have secured savings which are estimated to have reached a cumulative total of some £500 million at today's prices.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will give a date when he will announce the areas of work in his Department to be market tested; and whether all relevant information will be made publicly available.
I have nothing to add to the answer given by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster to my hon. Friend the Member for Cambridgeshire, South-East (Mr. Paice) on 22 June, Official Report column 102.