Written Answers To Questions
Thursday 28 October 1993
Church Commissioners
Parish Funding
To ask the right hon. Member for Selby, representing the Church Commissioners, if he will make a statement on the Church Commissioners' proposals to reduce the funding support for parishes over the next five years.
The Commissioners are currently discussing with dioceses what action will be needed over the next few years to correct the over-distribution of Commissioners' funds in previous years and to bring their income and expenditure into balance. This is likely to involve a mixture of reductions in allocations and the transfer to dioceses of responsibility for some categories of expenditure. The mission and ministry of the Church will depend increasingly on the giving of church members.
Attorney-General
War Crimes
To ask the Attorney-General how many cases are actively under consideration for possible prosecution under the War Crimes Act 1991; and if he will make a statement.
The Metropolitan police war crimes unit has submitted interim reports to the DPP in 10 cases. Inquiries into those 10 cases are still being actively pursued. The inquiries are not yet complete and the question of a possible prosecution cannot be considered until they are concluded.
Siemion Serafimowicz
To ask the Attorney-General what consideration has been given to the case of Siemion Serafimowicz by the Director of Public Prosecutions; and if he will make a statement.
The police are actively inquiring into allegations against Siemion Serafimowicz and as soon as those inquiries are completed, the question of any possible prosecution will be considered by the Director of Public Prosecutions.
Mrs Lubov Voronovich
To ask the Attorney-General what consideration is being given to launching a prosecution in respect of the murder of members of the family of Mrs. Lubov Voronovich; and if he will make a statement.
The Metropolitan police war crimes unit is actively pursuing inquiries in respect of this and a number of other allegations. When those inquiries are complete, the Director of Public Prosecutions will consider whether prosecutions should follow.
Treason Allegation
To ask the Attorney-General when he expects the Director of Public Prosecutions to make a decision in respect of the complaint of alleged treason by Mr. Rodney Atkinson; how long the DPP has now been considering the complaint; and if he will make a statement.
Complaints of alleged treason made by Mr. Rodney Atkinson and Mr. Norris McWhirter were referred to the Crown Prosecution Service by the clerk to the justices at Hexham, Northumberland, on 9 September 1993. The Crown Prosecution Service wrote to the clerk to the justices on 22 October 1993 stating that, although it was entirely appropriate for the clerk to have referred the matter to the Crown Prosecution Service, the complaints themselves were misconceived and totally without foundation.
Racial Hatred Incitement
To ask the Attorney-General how many prosecutions for incitement to racial hatred under the Public Order Act 1986 he has authorised in each year since 1987; and on how many occasions the prosecution was successful.
Since 1987, the Law Officers have consented to the prosecution of offences contrary to part III of the Public Order Act 1986 in respect of the following numbers of persons:
| Year | Number |
| 1987 | 0 |
| 1988 | 2 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 2 |
| 1991 | 3 |
| 1992 | 3 |
| 1993 | 2 |
Home Department
Rape
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what consideration has been given to ending the right to anonymity of victims in rape trials; what current provisions govern this right; and if he will make a statement.
Anonymity for complainants in rape trials is governed by the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1976.The Government are committed to ensuring that victims of all sexual offences are encouraged to report these crimes and are well treated by the criminal justice system when they do so. In 1992, the Government supported private Member's legislation—now the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992—which extended the right to anonymity to victims of all sexual offences.
However, the Government recognise that difficult questions can arise when a defendant is acquitted and there has been substantial publicity surrounding the case. My right hon. and learned Friend has recently indicated his intention to review the arguments for and against the current anonymity provisions as they relate both to complainants and defendants.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many people have been tried on
| Males tried at the Crown Court and found guilty at all courts of rape offences by type of offence and type of court 1985 to 19921 | ||||||
| England and Wales | ||||||
| Found guilty | ||||||
| Class | Year/Description | Act and section | Tried at the Crown Court | Magistrates' courts | Crown Court | All courts |
| 1985 | ||||||
| 19.02 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with a woman who is a defective | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 7 as amended by Mental Health Act 1959 section 127 | 4 | — | 4 | 4 |
| 19.03 | Male member of staff of hospital or mental nursing home having unlawful sexual intercourse with a female patient | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(l)(a) | — | — | — | — |
| 19.04 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with mentally disordered female patient who is subject to his care | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(1)(b) | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| 19.05 | Rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 474 | 1 | 338 | 339 |
| 19.06 | Attempted rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 86 | 7 | 75 | 82 |
| Total | 565 | 8 | 418 | 426 | ||
| 1986 | ||||||
| 19.02 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with a woman who is a defective | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 7 as amended by Mental Health Act 1959 section 127 | 7 | — | 6 | 6 |
| 19.03 | Male member of staff of hospital or mental nursing home having unlawful sexual intercourse with a female patient | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(l)(a) | — | — | — | — |
| 19.04 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with mentally disordered female patient who is subject to his care | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(l)(b) | — | — | — | — |
| 19.05 | Rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 503 | — | 329 | 329 |
| 19.06 | Attempted rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 80 | 2 | 63 | 65 |
| Total | 590 | 2 | 398 | 400 | ||
| 1987 | ||||||
| 19.02 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with a woman who is a defective | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 7 as amended by Mental Health Act 1959 section 127 | 5 | — | 5 | 5 |
| 19.03 | Male member of staff of hospital or mental nursing home having unlawful sexual intercourse with a female patient | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(l)(a) | — | — | — | — |
| 19.04 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with mentally disordered female patient who is subject to his care | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(1 )(b) | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| 19.05 | Rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 551 | 2 | 347 | 349 |
| 19.06 | Attempted rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 89 | — | 70 | 70 |
| Total | 646 | 2 | 423 | 425 | ||
| 1988 | ||||||
| 19.02 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with a woman who is a defective | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 7 as amended by Mental Health Act 1959 section 127 | 7 | — | 6 | 6 |
charges of (a) rape and (b) attempted rape (i) in the current year using the most recent statistics and (ii) for each preceding year from 1985, inclusive;
(2) how many people have been found guilty of (a) rape and (b) attempted rape (i) in the current year, using the most recent available statistics and (ii) for each preceding year from 1985, inclusive.
Information from 1985 to 1992—which is provisional—is given in the table. The 1993 data will not be available until the autumn of 1994.
Found guilty
| ||||||
Class
| Year/Description
| Act and section
| Tried at the Crown Court
| Magistrates' courts
| Crown Court
| All courts
|
| 19.03 | Male member of staff of hospital or mental nursing home having unlawful sexual intercourse with a female patient | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(l)(a) | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| 19.04 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with mentally disordered female patient who is subject to his care | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(l)(b) | — | — | — | — |
| 19.05 | Rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 670 | 2 | 411 | 413 |
| 19.06 | Attempted rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 114 | — | 79 | 79 |
| Total | 792 | 2 | 497 | 499 | ||
1989
| ||||||
| 19.02 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with a woman who is a defective | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 7 as amended by Mental Health Act 1959 section 127 | 6 | — | 4 | 4 |
| 19.03 | Male member of staff of hospital or mental nursing home having unlawful sexual intercourse with a female patient | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(l)(a) | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| 19.04 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with mentally disordered female patient who is subject to his care | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(l)(b) | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| 19.05 | Rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 777
| 3 | 468 | 471 |
| 19.06 | Attempted rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 139 | 1 | 110 | 111 |
| Total | 924 | 4 | 584 | 588 | ||
1990
| ||||||
| 19.02 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with a woman who is a defective | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 7 as amended by Mental Health Act 1959 section 127 | 8 | — | 7 | 7 |
| 19.03 | Male member of staff of hospital or mental nursing home having unlawful sexual intercourse with a female patient | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(l)(a) | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| 19.04 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with mentally disordered female patient who is subject to his care | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(1)(b) | — | — | — | — |
| 19.05 | Rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 799 | 1 | 454 | 455 |
| 19.06 | Attempted rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 103 | 2 | 76 | 78 |
| Total | 911 | 3 | 538 | 541 | ||
1991
| ||||||
| 19.02 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with a woman who is a defective | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 7 as amended by Mental Health Act 1959 section 127 | 8 | — | 5 | 5 |
| 19.03 | Male member of staff of hospital or mental nursing home having unlawful sexual intercourse with a female patient | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(l)(a) | 2 | — | 2 | 2 |
| 19.04 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with mentally disordered female patient who is subject to his care | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(l)(b) | — | — | — | — |
| 19.05 | Rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 842 | 1 | 465 | 466 |
| 19.06 | Attempted rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 102 | — | 64 | 64 |
| Total | 954 | 1 | 536 | 537 | ||
19921
| ||||||
| 19.02 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with a woman who is a defective | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 7 as amended by Mental Health Act 1959 section 127 | 6 | — | 4 | 4 |
| 19.03 | Male member of staff of hospital or mental nursing home having unlawful sexual intercourse with a female patient | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(l)(a) | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
Found guilty
| ||||||
Class
| Year/Description
| Act and section
| Tried at the Crown Court
| Magistrates' courts
| Crown Court
| All courts
|
| 19.04 | Man having unlawful sexual intercourse with mentally disordered female patient who is subject to his care | Mental Health Act 1959 section 128(1)(b) | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| 19.05 | Rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 827 | 1 | 424 | 425 |
| 19.06 | Attempted rape | Sexual Offences Act 1956 section 1 | 96 | — | 61 | 61 |
| Other2 | — | 1 | — | 1 | ||
| Total | — | 931 | 2 | 491 | 493 | |
1 Provisional. | ||||||
2 Details of offence not known. | ||||||
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many cases of (a) rape and (b) attempted rape are recorded in (i) the most recent crime statistics for the current year and (ii) for each preceding year from 1985, inclusive.
Figures for attempted rape are included in the rape offence classification and are not separately available. There were 4,142 recorded rapes in England and Wales in 1992. Figures for 1985–91 are published in table 2.16 of "Criminal Statistics, England and Wales, 1991", a copy of which is available in the Library.
Bosnian Refugees
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will name each voluntary organisation which assisted in the reception of Bosnian refugees in 1992; and how much grant each received.
In 1992, the Home Office funded the Refugee Council and the British Red Cross to provide reception arrangements for ex-detainees and other humanitarian cases, and their dependants, whom the Government brought here from the former Yugoslavia at the request of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. In 1992–93, grants of £476,000 and £86,000 were paid to the Refugee Council and British Red Cross, respectively for this purpose.A full list of organisations making their own arrangements to assist individuals from Bosnia is not available.
Ethnic Minorities
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what consultation took place with representatives of the ethnic minority communities in (a) Lancashire, (b) the north-west and (c) England before the Government decided to reduce the share of section 11 funding for projects funded jointly with local authorities from 75 to 57 per cent.
Decisions made in the public expenditure round reflect the general economic situation and consultation with particular interest groups would not be practicable in the course of that process. However, we have subsequently sought the views of all interested parties on how the available funding should be used in order to achieve maximum benefit for members of ethnic minorities.
National Identity Card
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what discussions he has had with the banks about the viability of smart card technology as a basis for a national identity card system.
My right hon. and learned Friend has had no such discussions with banks.
Young People (Custody)
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) 15 and 16-year-olds and (b) 17 to 21-year-olds were held under sentence or remand in gaols in England and Wales at the latest date available; and what were the corresponding numbers during each of the preceding 12 months.
Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from A. J. Butler to Ms Jean Corston, dated 28 October 1993:
The Home Secretary has asked me, in the absence of the Director General from the office, to reply to your recent Question asking how many (a) 15 and 16 year olds and (b) 17 to 21 year olds were held under sentence or remand in jails in England and Wales at the latest date available; and what the corresponding numbers were during each of the preceding twelve months.
The information you have requested is only available for 30 June 1992 and 30 June 1993. I enclose a table detailing the population aged 15 to 20, by type of custody in Prison Service establishments in England and Wales on those dates.
Population 1 aged under 21 by type of custody in Prison Service establishments in England and Wales on 30 June 1993
| |||
Age
| Untried
| Convicted unsentenced
| Sentenced2
|
| 15–16 | 85 | 36 | 308 |
| 17–20 | 1,890 | 784 | 4,773 |
| TOTAL | 1,975 | 820 | 5,081 |
1 Provisional data. | |||
2 Includes those sentenced for non payment of a fine. | |||
Population 1 aged under 21 by type of custody in Prison Service establishments in England and Wales on 30 June 1992 2
| |||
Age
| Untried
| Convicted unsentenced
| Sentenced 2
|
| 15–16 | 77
| 20 | 261 |
| 17–20 | 1,881 | 746 | 5,296 |
| TOTAL | 1,958 | 766 | 5,557 |
1 Provisional data. | |||
2 Excludes those held in police cells (140 untried, 2 convicted unsentenced and 32 sentenced on 30 June 1992). | |||
3 Includes those sentenced for non payment of a fine. | |||
European Police Information Centre
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much it has cost to set up the European police information centre; and what is the annual running cost.
Total capital costs have been £68,000. Running costs are expected to be £2,000 per annum.
Police (Protective Clothing)
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what investigations have been carried out to ascertain the effectiveness of issuing the Metropolitan police and other forces with protective clothing.
The operational use of protective clothing is primarily a matter for chief officers of police. So far as I am aware no investigations into its effectiveness have been carried out by police forces. The police scientific development branch offers advice to chief constables on protective clothing which is based on trials. It has also partly completed a project to assemble information about public order injuries from which it will be possible to assess the effectiveness of protective equipment.
Siemion Serafimowicz
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will withdraw the passport of Siemion Serafimowicz.
Records relating to the issue and possession of a British passport are confidential. It would not be appropriate for me to comment on this particular case.
Blakenhurst Prison
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if he will give details of all complaints made by persons at Blakenhurst prison during the disturbances at that prison on 9 October;(2) what reports he has received concerning assaults on prisoners by prison officers in the segregation unit of Blakenhurst prison.
Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from A. J. Butler to Ms Joan Ruddock, dated 28 October 1993:
The Home Secretary has asked me, in the absence of the Director General from the office, to reply to your recent Questions about assaults on prisoners by prison officers in the segregation unit, and about complaints of assaults made by persons during the disturbances on 9 October, at Blakenhurst prison.
Six prisoners at HMP Blakenhurst have made complaints of assault allegedly committed by prisoner custody officers on 9 October. These are being investigated by the Controller as required by Section 85(4)(b) of the Criminal Justice Act 1991.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what legal action is pending by prisoners at Blakenhurst prison against prison officers.
Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from A. J. Butler to Ms Joan Ruddock, dated 28 October 1993:
The Home Secretary has asked me, in the absence of the Director General from the office, to reply to your recent Question about what legal action is pending by prisoners at Blakenhurst prison agaisnt prison officers.
I am not aware of any such action.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has to ask Her Majesty's chief inspectors of prisons to visit Blakenhurst prison and to report on the running of the prison.
Unless otherwise directed by the Secretary of State, it is for Her Majesty's chief inspector of prisons to decide when he wishes to visit and report to the Secretary of State on the running of any prison.Each prison should be inspected about every five years.
Aero-Engines
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pusuant to his reply of 21 October, Official Report, column 271–72, if he will specify the animals used to test impact consequences on aero-engines.
Ducks.
Racial Incidents
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list by police force area in England and Wales, reported racial incidents so far in 1993.
The information requested is not yet available. It is collated centrally on an annual basis and will be made available for the whole of 1993. All available earlier data have already been provided for years up to 1992.
Data Protection
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what action he is taking to implement the improvements to the administration and enforcement of the Data Protection Act 1984 recommended by the National Audit Office report on data protection controls and safeguards.
The recommendations in the National Audit Office report are primarily directed to the Data Protection Registrar. I understand that he is considering the implications of the report for the work of his office.
Racist Attacks
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many men and how many women have been killed as a result of racist attacks in England and Wales in each year since 1988.
The information requested is not available. The police are required to make returns of each known homicide to the Home Office, but are not specifically requested to note whether they consider the attack was a racist one.
Young Offenders
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many 15-year-olds categorised as a suicide risk were placed in a strip cell (a) 1992 and (b) 1993 to date;(2) how many 15-year-old inmates were categorised as a suicide risk in
(a) 1992 and (b) 1993 to the latest available date;
(3) how many reported instances of self-injury there were in prisons and young offender institutions involving 15-year-olds (a) remanded into custody and (b) sentenced to custody in (i) 1992 and (ii) 1993 to the latest available date.
[holding answers 19 October 1993]: Responsibility for these matters has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from A. J. Butler to Ms Joan Ruddock, dated 28 October 1993:
The Home Secretary has asked me, in the absence of the Director General, to reply to your recent Parliamentary Questions about 15 year olds in prison custody who have self injured, been categorised as a suicide risk or placed in strip cells.
The number of incidents of self injury by 15 year olds in Prison Service custody in 1992 and 1993 is as follows:
1992
| 1 1993
| |
| Remand | 1 | 2 |
| Sentenced | 19 | 32 |
| TOTAL | 20 | 34 |
1 To 30 September. | ||
There has been no self-inflicted death by a 15 year old prisoner in 1992 or 1993.
Information about the number of 15 year old prisoners who have been categorised as a suicide risk, and about the number of such prisoners placed in unfurnished or protective accommodation, is not available.
Environment
Standard Spending Assessments
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how many representations he has received from local authorities concerning his review of standard spending assessments.
A total of 197 local authorities have responded to our invitation to make representations on the review of standard spending assessments for 1994–95.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what assessment he has made of the extent to which the current differential in grant and standard spending assessments between different authorities for primary and secondary education (a) are excessive or (b) relate accurately to the different needs of pupils in different authorities.
The standard spending assessment element for education is based on detailed research and analysis fully discussed with the local authority associations. Both the primary and secondary education assessments incorporate an index of additional educational need which is based on indicators reflecting the social and economic characteristics of the population of each authority.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the reasons underlying the range of standard spending assessments for other district level services.
The standard spending assessments of individual authorities for other district level services are based on the formula set out in the Local Government Finance Report for 1993–94, which was approved by the House in February. The formula reflects those social and demographic characteristics of each area considered to be relevant in the provision of this group of services.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the current timetable for the review of standard spending assessments.
Work on the review of standard spending assessments for 1994–95 has now finished. My right hon. Friend will announce the outcome of the review later in the autumn as part of his proposals for revenue support grant for 1994–95. There will then be a period of consultation on those proposals, as in previous years.
Sheltered Housing
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what representations he has received concerning the private ownership of occupied sheltered housing; what help is available to those living in non-regulated/non-registered accommodation; and if he will set up an ombudsman scheme.
The Department has received written representations from elderly leaseholders—directly or through their residents' asociations and via hon. Members.All leaseholders are protected by the contractual terms of their lease which setout the rights and duties of landlords and tenants and the basis of the service charges. In addition, the existing legislation in the Landlord and Tenant Acts of 1985 and 1987 gives leaseholders additional statutory rights.This protection will be augmented by new provisions in the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. Qualifying tenants may jointly purchase the freehold of their flats. It also enables the Secretary of State to approve codes of management practice governing property management and gives tenants the right to a management audit of their landlord by an independent accountant or surveyor.The Government are not persuaded of the case for an ombudsman scheme for privately owned sheltered housing, nor of the practicality of that approach.
Local Government Finance
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what was the regional total of capital expenditure by the local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89 for each standard English region;(2) what was the capital allocation for each local authority in England for
(a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89;
(3) what was the national total of capital allocations for other services to local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89; and if he will give the breakdown of the total between (i) non-metropolitan district councils, (ii) county councils, (iii) metropolitan district councils, (iv) London boroughs and (v) the City of London;
(4) what was the regional total of capital expenditure on other services by the local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89 for each standard English region;
(5) what was the capital expenditure on other services by each local authority in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988.-89;
(6) what was the national total of capital expenditure by local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89; and if he will give the breakdown of the total between (i) non-metropolitan district councils, (ii) county councils, (iii) metropolitan district councils, (iv) London boroughs and (v) the City of London;
(7) what was the regional total of capital allocations for other services to the local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89 for each standard English region;
(8) what was the capital expenditure by each local authority in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89;
(9) what was the national total of capital expenditure on other services by local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89; and if he will give the breakdown of the total between (i) non-metropolitan district councils, (ii) county councils, (iii) metropolitan district councils, (iv) London boroughs and (v) the City of London;
(10) what was the capital allocation for other services for each local authority in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89;
(11) what was the national total of capital allocations to local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89; and if he will give the breakdown of the total between (i) non-metropolitan district councils, (ii) county councils, (iii) metropolitan district councils, (iv) London boroughs and (v) the City of London;
(12) what was the regional total of capital allocations to the local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89 for each standard English region.
I will write to the hon. Member and put the replies in the Library.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what was the regional total of capital expenditure on housing by the local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89 for each standard English region;(2) what was the capital expenditure on housing by each local authority in England for
(a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89;
(3) what was the national total of capital expenditure on housing by local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89; and if he will give the breakdown of the total between (i) non-metropolitan district councils, (ii) county councils, (iii) metropolitan district councils, (iv) London boroughs and (v) the City of London.
I will write to the hon. Member.
Revenue Support Grant
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the revenue support grant given to Barnet and Wandsworth in 1993–94; and what is the amount expressed relative to the respective populations.
The information requested is as follows.
| Local authority | Revenue Support Grant,1993–94 | |
| £ million | £ per head | |
| Barnet | 93·823 | 314·93 |
| Wandsworth | 160·203 | 619 18 |
Government Car Service
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how many cars there are in the Government car service; and how many (a) use lead free petrol, (b) are fitted with catalytic converters and (c) are electric powered.
There are currently 193 cars in the Government car service fleet; 181 use lead-free petrol and 144 are equipped with catalytic converters. With the exception of some vehicles which cannot be readily replaced, the entire GCS fleet will use unleaded petrol with catalytic converters by 1 April 1994.No electric-powered vehicles are currently in use by the GCS. Electric-powered vehicles were trialled, but were not found to be capable of the required operating range.
Radioactive Waste
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what quantities of plutonium-contaminated radioactive waste material is currently stored at the Drigg site; and what plans there are to remove this material to Sellafield.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how much plutonium-contaminated material is currently being stored at Drigg low-level waste dump; whether this material is intended to be moved to Sellafielcl ; and to what extent the containers currently intended to be used for these transports comply with IAEA regulations.
I have been asked to reply.
The Drigg site is owned and operated by British Nuclear Fuels plc and is used for the disposal of solid low-level radioactive waste. It has also been used for the storage of plutonium-contaminated material, a category of intermediate level waste. I understand that the company is planning to move this material to Sellafield for interim storage and pre-disposal treatment. Any such movements are subject to regulation by the Department of Transport as the national competent authority.
Wood Report
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when he expects to publish his response to the Wood report.
[holding answer 27 October 1993]: The Government have carefully considered the Wood report on the rating of plant and machinery, and industry's responses to it. The committee has produced a package of measures to update the law, to harmonise the rating systems, and to remove the substantial differences between the rules in the various parts of the United Kingdom.We have decided that the major recommendations of the report should be implemented throughout Great Britain for the 1995 rating revaluation of all non-domestic property. The main change to the committee's propoals will be to apply these rating rules whatever the valuation technique used.Implementation of the recommendations will involve replacing secondary legislation in England and Wales, and amending primary legislation in Scotland. The Government will consult interested people shortly on the way in which this will be done.
Trade And Industry
Reprocessed Uranium
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what quantities of reprocessed uranium have been returned to overseas customers with reprocessing contracts with British Nuclear Fuels plc to date; what quantities remain stored in the United Kingdom and at which locations; and what arrangements have been put in place for the future management of reprocessed uranium arising from foreign contracts.
Except for small quantities which have already been returned, uranium arising from reprocessing to date by British Nuclear Fuels plc of irradiated nuclear fuel on behalf of overseas customers is stored under international safeguards by the company at its various sites.Plans for the usage of current and future uranium from reprocessing are a commercial matter for British Nuclear Fuels plc and its customers. The new oxide fuels complex at Springfields has the capability to fabricate nuclear fuels using recycled uranium from the thermal oxide reprocessing plant.
Nuclear Safety
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will bring forward proposals to require (a) the nuclear installations inspectorate and (b) Nuclear Electric to publish data on routine radioactive combination caused by the decommissioning of the Berkeley nuclear power station.
No. Decommissioning of Berkeley nuclear power station is regulated by the Health and Safety Executive's nuclear installations inspectorate by means of conditions attached to the nuclear site licence. These include the need for consideration of a safety case for decommissioning and arrangements for reporting incidents including those involving radioactive contamination. No significant radioactive contamination incidents have arisen during the decommissioning of Berkeley. Routine monitoring for contamination off site is carried out by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, and Her Majesty's inspectorate of pollution and the data are published annually.
Disqualified Directors
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what steps are being taken to ensure that Companies House keeps the register of disqualified directors up to date.
The register of disqualified directors is maintained and updated by Companies House from information supplied to it on new disqualifications from the various courts throughout the country. The register currently contains the names of all those directors notified to Companies House by the courts.Companies House is working with the Lord Chancellor's Department to improve reporting by the courts.
Newspapers
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will commission research into the arrangements for the supply and distribution of newspapers in Northern Ireland; and if he will make a statement.
No, my right hon. Friend the President of the Board of Trade has no plans to commission research into the arrangements for the supply and distribution of newspapers in Northern Ireland.On 19 August 1992 the Director General of Fair Trading referred to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission—MMC—the supply of newspapers from publishers to wholesalers and wholesalers to retailers in England and Wales. The MMC reported to the President of the Board of Trade on 30 July. Its recommendations are still under consideration and until the report is published it would be inappropriate for me to comment further.The terms of reference of the MMC's inquiry exclude Scotland and Northern Ireland, primarily because newspaper distribution arrangements there are different. However, the Office of Fair Trading continues to keep these markets under review and, when the MMC's report is published, will examine the general principles arising from its conclusions to see whether any action is warranted.
Prescribed Quantities
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what plans he has to seek to amend the United Kingdom's national legislation on prescribed quantities; and what action he proposes to make in relation to current EC legislation on prescribed quantities and unit pricing.
Under the existing national legislation certain pre-packed goods, including products such as biscuits, breakfast cereals, pasta and bread, must be produced in specified standard sizes. This restricts choice for the consumer—the standard sizes may not always suit their needs—and can impose an unnecessary burden on business.Accordingly, the Government are today issuing a consultation document to interested parties about abolishing these requirements where this would not conflict with mandatory EC legislation.With similar concerns in mind, the Government also propose to discuss with the European Commission ways of reducing the burden of the EC's legislation on standard sizes and on related unit pricing. This requires retailers to display the price per unit of measurement for certain categories of pre-packed goods where they are not made up in standard sizes.
European Regional Aid
To ask the President of the Board of Trade which areas he has proposed to the European Commission should be designated under objectives 2 and 5(b) of the European structural funds.
I placed in the Library of the House on 11 October a detailed list of the areas that have been proposed. In summary, the population coverage of the proposals is as follows:
| '000s | ||
| Objective 2 | Objective 5(b) | |
| Scotland and Wales | 5,211 | 1,087 |
| Northern England | 9,866 | 409 |
| English Midlands | 4,822 | 415 |
| Southern England | 3,525 | 909 |
| Gibraltar | 30 | — |
Beer And Cider
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will make a statement on his Department's review of policy on section 43 of the Weights and Measures Act 1985 relating to froth on beer or cider.
My hon. Friend the Member for Gainsborough and Horncastle (Mr. Leigh) announced on 29 March, Official Report, columns 50–51 that, as part of the Government's deregulation initiative, the Department of Trade and Industry was reassessing the costs and benefits of the implementation of section 43 and that interested parties had been asked to provide information relevant to this reassessment.We have now completed our reassessment of the commencement order which was made last year and which would bring section 43 into force from next April. After reviewing the costs of complying with the order, and considering the views of consumers, enforcement authorities and business we have concluded that these costs are disproportionate to the consumer benefit. They would include the cost to licensees of replacing brim measure glasses with new lined glasses or installing meters. It was also clear from the consultations that in most cases the costs of extra beer would be passed on to the consumer, with price increases amounting to about 7p a pint in pubs now using brim measures.Accordingly, I have today revoked the commencement order thus allowing the continuation of the existing case law that a pint of beer may consist of liquid and a reasonable head. We will also bring forward, as soon as parliamentary time permits, legislation to repeal section 43.I understand that the Brewers' Society is issuing revised guidance to its members on the dispense of draught beer. It will say that a pint of draught beer with a head should contain a minimum of 95 per cent. liquid. This guidance is issued in conjunction with organisations representing licensees. Trading standards officers will be able to refer to the guidance in court cases about short measure and the courts can be expected to attach considerable weight to it.If customers are unhappy with the amount of liquid beer they have received they are already able to ask for, and should get, a top-up. The Brewers' Society's revised guidance will state that such requests should always be received with good grace.
Nuclear Waste
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what response he has made to the letter sent to him on 4 August by Professor Horlock in his capacity of chairman of the Advisory Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations on nuclear waste management in the United Kingdom.
[holding answer 27 October 1993]: I have sent a copy of Professor Horlock's letter of 4 August, and of my reply, to the hon. Member and have placed a copy of each in the Library of the House.
Insolvency Service
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what percentage of reports from insolvency practitioners were rejected by the Insolvency Service in the latest available year; and if he will provide a breakdown of the numbers and percentages of rejected reports according to each principal reason for rejection.
[holding answer 27 October 1993]: The percentage of reports from insolvency practitioners rejected at the vetting stage during the 12 months to 30 September 1993 was 80.3 per cent.—3,345 reports.Of those reports, 70 per cent. identified elements of unfit conduct, but the case was not considered to be sufficiently serious or evidentially strong enough to justify proceeding in the public interest or there was clear mitigation or some other relevant factor; 24 per cent. were linked with one or more other companies/individuals subject to other insolvency procedures or proceedings; 5 per cent. were submitted with insufficient time remaining to prepare the evidence and with an insufficient basis to seek leave to extend the statutory time limit; and 1 per cent. where the whereabouts of the director were not known and service would be unlikely to be effected.
Duchy Of Lancaster
Overseas Staff And Premises
To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what is the cost for the current financial year of his Department having (a) premises and (b) personnel overseas; and what were the comparable figures for 12 months ago.
The expenditure by my Department on premises and personnel overseas is as follows:
| Current financial year (estimated) £ | Previous financial year £ | |
| Premises1 | 10,044 | 7,323 |
| Personnel2 | 1,037,086 | 956,991 |
| Notes: | ||
| 1 These costs relate to HMSO's recently opened European Sales Office in Germany. | ||
| 2 These costs include the staffing of HMSO's European Sales Office (an estimated £43,551 in 1993 and £29,654 in 1992). The remainder covers the cost of British civil servants serving with European Community institutions in furtherance of the Government's initiative for wider representation in Europe. | ||
Defence
Low Flying
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what communications have taken place between his Department and the German authorities concerning the German experience of operating a computerised low flying management system.
My Department holds frequent discussions with the German authorities, at all levels. These cover a wide range of topics of mutual interest, and have included the German experience of operating a computerised low flying management system. The system in use in Germany is, however, somewhat different in scope and purpose to the automated low flying, flight planning, inquiry and notification system currently being developed for use in the United Kingdom.
Nuclear Weapons Accidents
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will declassify the RN manual BR4022 and the RAF manual AP 110A-0103-IAI, both relating to accident procedures, and subsequent amendments lists; and if he will make those documents available to civilian emergency services and local authorities with emergency planning responsibility.
No. The documents are already available to students on the relevant MOD training courses. Furthermore, the MOD document for local authorities and emergency services, issued in December 1992, gives appropriate guidance on contingency planning and the countermeasures that should be taken to protect the public.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will organise a nuclear weapon transport accident exercise in Scotland.
Officers from Scottish emergency services and local authorities already participate in the exercises that are an integral part of the MOD's regular nuclear accident response training courses. The MOD also conducts a programme of other nuclear accident response exercises with relevant authorities throughout the United Kingdom. A variety of scenarios are addressed in such exercises, including nuclear weapon transport accidents. An exercise addressing nuclear weapon contingency planning at Coulport was held earlier this year; a nuclear weapon transport exercise will be held in due course in Scotland.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) if he will make a statement on liaison arrangements and communications equipment which would be used between the RAF incident team and local civilian services and authorities in the event of a nuclear weapons accident in (a) Scotland and (b) other parts of the United Kingdom;(2) if he will make a statement on contingency planning for an accident involving a nuclear weapon transported by air over Scotland; and if such weapons are transported by air over Scotland.
Contingency plans for all forms of nuclear weapon transport are described in the MOD guidance document for local authorities and emergency services, issued in December 1992. A copy has already been placed in the Library.It is the long-standing policy of successive Governments to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at any particular place or time; this applies also to the routes that are used for their transportation.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what is the maximum amount of time during which traffic on a public road might have to be stopped in a worst case scenario nuclear weapon transport accident.
The duration of traffic restrictions would clearly be entirely dependent on the specific circumstances of an accident.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will incorporate his Department's guidance to local authorities on response to nuclear weapon transport accidents into the nuclear accident procedures course.
The guidance document for local authorities and emergency services was issued in December 1992. It has already been incorporated into the nuclear accident procedures course.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will extend the scope and participation of the nuclear accident procedures course to provide local authority input on the same basis as the special safety study period.
Local authority emergency planning officers already lecture to both courses, and equally organisers of both courses encourage constructive inputs from the officers and officials, whether from local authorities or elsewhere, who attend the courses.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will provide for participation by health boards and regional health authorities in nuclear accident procedures courses and special safety study periods in future.
Officials from health boards and regional health authorities already attend both courses, and have done so for some years.
5 Airborne Brigade
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to his answer of 21 October, Official Report, column 328,if he will list the wheeled and tracked transport currently available to 5 Airborne Brigade, showing specifically the number of (a) six-wheeled buggies, (b) Land-Rovers, (c) light-wheeled tractors and (d) eager-beavers; if he has any plans to increase the on-ground mobility of the brigade; and if he will make a statement.
5 Airborne Brigade's current peacetime establishments for the vehicles listed are:
- Motorcycles
- Ambulances
- Cars and Vans
- Minibuses
- Recovery Vehicles
- Trucks 1 Tonne, 4 Tonne, 8 Tonne
- Trucks Utility Heavy
- Demountable Rack Offloading and Pick-Up System
- (DROPS) Medium Mobility Load Carriers
- Trailers
- Earth Moving Plant
- Barrack Mechanical Handling Equipment
The wheeled and tracked transport currently provided for the brigade is sufficient to meet its training and operational needs.
Normandy Landings
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what steps he proposes to take to commemorate the 50th anniversary in 1994 of the Normandy landings.
The Ministry of Defence has overall responsibility for organising the Government's participation in commemorative events marking the 50th anniverasary of the D-Day landings. An announcement of our plans will be made shortly.
Battle Of Arnhem
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what steps he proposes to take to commemorate the 50th anniversary in 1994 of the battle of Arnhem.
The anniversary of the battle of Arnhem is commemorated each year in the Netherlands. The British Government will be represented at an appropriate level at the 50th anniversary in 1994. In addition, the occasion will be marked by a parachute drop by members of 5 Airborne Brigade.
Armed Services Suppliers
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of ammunition and propellants supplied to the armed services are procured from foreign companies; how many of those foreign companies are incorporated in EC states; and what is the value of these contracts.
Less than 5 per cent. by value of our current contracts for ammunition and propellants have been placed directly with foreign companies. Four companies are involved, three of which are incorporated in EC states. The total value of the overseas contracts is £10 million.
Wartime Command Centre
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what has been the total cost to date of the construction of a wartime command centre underneath the Ministry of Defence building in Whitehall.
The total cost to date of the construction and equipping of the command centre underneath the Ministry of Defence building in Whitehall is some £126 million, of which £66 million was for construction which has now been completed.
Anti-Ballistic Missiles
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what is his Department's latest assessment of the improvements made to Russian anti-ballistic missile defences around Moscow since 1990 and of whether Russia is still acting in strict compliance with the terms of the 1972 anti-ballistic missile treaty.
The current Moscow ballistic missile defence system, which became operational in 1989, includes the Gazelle short-range and Gorgon long-range interceptors and conforms to the 1972 treaty and its protocols. This is a bilateral agreement between the US and Russia, and we are not aware of any compliance concerns at present.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what is his Department's assessment of Russia's capability to counter ballistic missile attack in areas of its territory which lie outside the operational range of the anti-ballistic missile defences that it deploys around Moscow.
In accordance with the 1972 ABM treaty, there are no strategic missile defences deployed outside of the Moscow ABM system. Some Russian surface-to-air missiles do however have a capability against short-range tactical ballistic missiles, but these are assessed as ineffective against strategic missiles.
Trident
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) if the requirement to test fire the United Kingdom's Trident D5 missiles will be significantly less than that for the Polaris missiles;(2) if the proportion of spare Trident missiles compared to the overall United Kingdom Trident missile buy will be significantly different from that of the United Kingdom's Polaris missile purchase.
There will be no spare Trident missiles. All will be deployed operationally, test fired or form part of a processing margin. The proportion of missiles in the second and third categories is expected to be significantly less than for Polaris.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if the Trident submarines will be capable of deploying a sub-strategic nuclear capability upon entering operational service.
Trident will be able to contribute to our sub-strategic capability on entering service.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if Her Majesty's Government can deploy the Trident system as an effective minimum nuclear deterrent with the number of Trident D5 missiles that have already been purchased from the United States; and whether there is a continuing requirement to purchase further Trident D5 missiles from the United States.
The United Kingdom's Trident strategic nuclear deterrent is not yet ready for operational deployment. As previously announced, further Trident D5 missiles are planned to be purchased from the United States in due course to meet the overall requirements of the Trident programme.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to his oral statement of 18 October, Official Report, columnns 34–25, if it is Her Majesty's Government's policy to deploy only Trident D5 missiles in the nuclear role when the WE177 eventually leaves service; and what are the implications of the decision for (a) the number of Trident D5 missiles required and (b) the overall number of nuclear warheads deployed by the United Kingdom.
On current plans, the Trident D5 missile will be the only United Kingdom nuclear system after the WE177 is eventually withdrawn for service. My right hon. and learned Friend's announcement on 18 October does not alter our previous commitment that each Trident submarine will carry no more than 128 warheads. It is not our practice to comment on future plans for the purchase of missiles.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when he expects to place the order for the next batch of Trident D5 missiles from the United States.
It is not our practice to reveal our future missile procurement plans.
Tornado
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of Tornado GR1s are withheld from conventional military duties in order to fulfil the sub-strategic nuclear role.
None. All nuclear capable Tornado GR1s are dual-roled and would undertake conventional military duties in wartime until required to fulfil the sub-strategic nuclear role.
Nuclear Weapons
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what is his Department's latest assessment of (a) the nuclear weapon programmes of (i) Iran, (ii) Iraq, (iii) Libya and (iv) Syria and (b) the earliest date by which (1) Iran, (2) Libya and (3) Syria could develop a crude nuclear weapon and develop the means of delivering a nuclear warhead on a ballistic missile.
The UN inspection teams found incontrovertible evidence that Iraq was developing a crude nuclear weapon and there is concern that Iraq could reinstate its nuclear weapons programme if current UN sanctions were to be lifted. As states which are parties to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty—NPT—Iran, Libya and Syria have undertaken formal commitments not to acquire nuclear weapons which we expect them to honour in full. The experience with Iraq has demonstrated however that membership of the NPT alone is not a guarantee of non-proliferation. We therefore take every opportunity both bilaterally and in international fora to stress the significance we attach to all states which are parties to the NPT complying fully with their obligations.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what is his Department's latest assessment of the number of air-launched sub-strategic nuclear weapons currently deployed by Russia.
An assessment of the number of air-launched sub-strategic nuclear weapons currently deployed by Russia is complicated by the fact that many are being withdrawn from service and are earmarked for dismantlement. We estimate that a total of 11,000 to 12,000 sub-strategic warheads of all types remain, but it is likely that some are non-operational.
Defence Research Agency
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many members of staff of the DRA at the Woolwich Arsenal site are on paid leave; and if he will make a statement.
This is a matter delegated to the Defence Research Agency under its framework document. I have, therefore, asked the chief executive to reply direct to the hon. Member.
Letter from John Chisholm to Mr. John Austin-Walker, dated 28 October 1993:
In today's written answer the Minister of State for Defence Procurement informed you that I would be replying to your question about DRA staff at the Woolwich Arsenal sites.
In answer to the first part of your question, there are no DRA staff members on special paid leave at the Woolwich Arsenal sites, although 10 MOD staff who were until recently on loan to the DRA but have been returned to MOD are on special paid leave whilst MOD examines their future employment.
You also asked for a statement on the DRA situation at Woolwich. As I explained in my letter to you of 5 August commercial pressures have caused me to accelerate plans for the withdrawal of DRA staff from the Woolwich sites. Steps to achieve this withdrawal are in hand. Those scientific and technical staff from Woolwich for whom the DRA has a continuing requirement have now been transferred to the management of other Sectors within the DRA. The staff for whom we regrettably have no jobs have either been given letters of redundancy or have been informed that they will be returning to MOD. The last DRA staff will have left the Woolwich West site by 31 March 1994; a small number will remain on the East site until the end of March 1995.
Overseas Development
Kenya (Refugees)
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions he has had with the Kenyan Government on the problems now being faced in that country as a result of refugees crossing the border from Somalia to Kenya; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend the Minister for Overseas Development discussed this issue recently with the Kenyan Foreign Minister. In 1992–23, we provided over £2.4 million via UN agencies and non-governmental organisations as aid to refugees in northern Kenya, over 85 per cent. of whom were Somalis.
Pergau Hydro-Electric Project
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will set out the factors underlying his decision to issue a ministerial directive to the accounting officer in his Department to incur expenditure on the Pergau hydro-electric project.
The accounting officer correctly carried out his responsibilities. I reached my decision against the wider background of Britain's interests in Malaysia. I had to take into account that an undertaking had been given at the highest level, and that we had made a formal offer of aid support for the Pergau project to the Malaysian Government. The Malaysians wanted to proceed. It would have been damaging to British companies and to British exports to Malaysia to renege on our undertaking. Later developments including the rapid expansion of our trade indicate that this was the right decision.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what considerations underlay his Department's decision to arrange for the loan agreement for the Pergau hydro-electric project to be made directly with Tenaga Nasional; and what consideration was given to arranging it with the Government of Malaysia.
The reasons for the loan agreement in respect of the Pergau project being with Tenaga Nasional rather than the Government of Malaysia are set out fully in paragraphs 40 to 42 of the National Audit Office report on the project, laid before the House on 22 October.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what options for financing the Pergau dam were considered; what was the cost of each; which was chosen; and what considerations underlay the choice.
I refer the right hon. Member to paragraphs 4, 5, 35–29 and 57 and appendix 2 of the National Audit Office report on the project, laid before the House on 22 October.
Aid And Trade
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list each individual scheme which received financial assistance under aid and trade provision since the programme began, in each case giving (a) the sum provided, (b) the date of project approval and (c) the project's location.
A list has been placed in the Library of the House. Central records on ATP projects include the dates of each formal ATP aid agreement concluded with an overseas government, but not the dates of approval of individual projects.
Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs
India
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the current relations between India and Her Majesty's Government.
Our relations with India are excellent.
Kashmir
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations Her Majesty's Government have made to the Governments of Pakistan and India regarding the situation in Kashmir.
We have regularly discussed the situation in Kashmir with the Governments of India and Pakistan, most recently at the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in Cyprus. We have encouraged both Governments to resolve their differences through bilateral dialogue.
European Parliament
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the rental of hemicycles rented by the European Parliament in (a) Strasbourg, (b) Brussels and (c) Luxembourg; and how often each building will be used for a plenary session in 1993.
The EP is holding 11 plenary sessions in the hemicycle in Strasbourg in 1993, and has held two mini-plenary sessions in the new hemicycle in Brussels this year. It has held none in Luxembourg since 1981.The detailed appropriations given in section 1, chapter 20 of the "General Budget of the European Community", published in "Official Journal" No. L31, volume 36 of 8 February 1993, copies of which are available in the House, indicate operating expenditure, including rental of buildings, as follows:
| Strasbourg: | Palais de 1'Europe: |
| 471,200 ecu (approximately £367,583) | |
| Brussels: | D1: |
| 20,750,000 ecu (approximately £16,187,075) |
Endangered Species
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to his answer of 20 October, Official Report, column 242, if he will give details of the seizures in Hong Kong restaurants and shops of suspected endangered animals and animal products.
Seizures by the Hong Kong authorities over the past 12 months—1 August 1992 to 3 July 1993 —of suspected endangered animals and animal products from Hong Kong shops and restaurants were as follows:
| Endangered Species | ||
| Pangolin | Scale | 0.43 kg. |
| Musk | Pod | 4 Nos. |
| Grain | 8 316 G | |
| Rhinoceros | Medicine | 4 small vials |
| Owl | Live | 1 Hd. |
| Sea-Turtle | Stuffed | 1 Hd. |
| Scale | 1 Pc. | |
| Land-Tortoise | Live | 3Hds. |
| Giant Salamander | Live | 26 Hds. |
Endangered Species
| ||
| Asiatic Bony | — | — |
| Tongue Fish | Live | 17 Tails |
| Arapaima Gigas | Live | 3 Tails |
Chemical Weapons Convention
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when Her Majesty's Government plans to ratify the chemical weapons convention.
Legislation is necessary to enable the United Kingdom to fulfil its obligations under the convention. We intend to ratify the convention as soon as this legislation is in place. The legislation will be introduced when parliamentary time permits.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs which countries in the middle east have not signed the chemical weapons convention.
One hundred and fifty states, including Bahrain, Iran, Israel, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen, have signed the chemical weapons convention since it opened for signature in January 1993. Of the middle eastern countries, only Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon have failed to sign.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the latest date by which 65 signatories to the chemical weapons convention must have ratified the convention in order that it comes into force in January 1995.
The earliest possible date that the chemical weapons convention can enter into force is 13 January 1995. To achieve this 65 signatories must have ratified the convention by 18 July 1994.
Sudan
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent efforts he has made to encourage a peaceful settlement between the warring factions in the Sudan.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given by my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs to the hon. Member for Birmingham, Small Heath (Mr. Godsiff) on 18 October, Official Report, column 79.
Test Ban Treaty
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will seek the successful negotiation of a comprehensive test ban treaty by September 1996.
The United Kingdom will be seeking a successful outcome to negotiations for a comprehensive test ban treaty within a reasonable time scale. We do not believe that setting a deadline for the treaty's conclusion will necessarily help the conduct of negotiations.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when direct negotiations towards a comprehensive test ban treaty are expected to resume; and which states are expected to participate.
Negotiations for a comprehensive test ban treaty are likely to begin in early 1994, when the conference on disarmament reconvenes in Geneva. We expect that all states who are members of the conference on disarmament will participate.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what are the conditions that will have to be met before Her Majesty's Government agree to sign a comprehensive test ban treaty.
The United Kingdom will be seeking a comprehensive test ban treaty which makes a real contribution to non-proliferation. Wide adherence and effective verification measures will be important in this regard, but we do not believe it sensible to set rigid conditions that a CTB treaty must satisfy before treaty negotiations begin.
Overseas Conferences
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much has been spent by his Department on sponsoring conferences overseas, either alone or jointly, in each of the last two years.
I regret that details of expenditure on sponsoring conferences overseas are not recorded separately and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Committee Of The Regions
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when the Government intend to nominate the United Kingdom members and alternative members of the Committee of the Regions; and whom they will nominate.
We have today proposed the following list of nominees for appointment by the Council of Ministers, in accordance with article 198a of the Maastricht treaty:MEMBERS
England
- Councillor Simon Day
- Devon County
- (Conservative)
- Lady Anson, DL JP
- Waverley District
- (Conservative)
- Sir Peter Bowness, CBE
- London Borough of Croydon
- (Conservative)
- Councillor Colin Warbrick
- Trafford Metropolitan Borough
- (Conservative)
- Councillor Christopher Penn
- Suffolk County
- (Conservative)
- Councillor Toby Harris
- London Borough of Haringey
- (Labour)
- Councillor Albert Bore
- Birmingham Metropolitan Borough
- (Labour)
- Councillor Josie Farrington
- Lancashire County
- (Labour)
- Councillor George Gill
- Gateshead Metropolitan Borough
- (Labour)
- Councillor Dennis Pettitt
- Nottinghamshire County
- (Labour)
- Councillor Janet Sillett
- Norwich District
- (Labour)
- Councillor Graham Tope
- London Borough of Sutton
- (Liberal Democrat)
- Councillor David Belotti
- East Sussex County
- (Liberal Democrat)
- Councillor Roy Cross
- Richmondshire District
- (Independent)
Scotland
- Councillor Charles Gray
- Strathclyde Region
- (Labour)
- Councillor Rosemary McKenna
- Cumbernauld and Kilsyth District
- (Labour)
- Councillor Brian Meek
- Edinburgh District
- (Conservative)
- Councillor Duncan
- McPherson) Highland Region
- (Independent)
- Councillor Daniel Coffey, JP
- Kilmarnock and Loudoun District
- (SNP)
Wales
- Councillor John Evans
- Rhmney Valley District Council
- (Labour)
- Lord Kenyon
- Wrexham Borough Council
- (Conservative)
- Councillor Eurig Wyn
- Gwynedd County Council
- (Plaid Cymru)
Northern Ireland
- Councillor Reg Empey
- Lord Mayor of Belfast
- (UUP)
- Councillor Dennis Haughey
- Cookstown Borough Council
- (SDLP)
ALTERNATE MEMBERS
England
- Councillor John Morgan, OBE
- Test Valley District
- (Conservative)
- Councillor Doreen Fleming
- Fenland District
- (Conservative)
- Councillor Fraser Mitchell
- Solihull Metropolitan Borough
- (Conservative)
- Councillor Elgar Jenkins, OBE
- Bath District
- (Conservative)
- Councillor Paul White
- Essex County
- (Conservative)
- Councillor John Battye
- Oldham Metropolitan Borough
- (Labour)
- Councillor Hadley Salt
- Barnsley Metropolitan Borough
- (Labour)
- Councillor Kenneth Bodfish
- East Essex County
- (Labour)
- Councillor Ian Swithinbank
- Northumberland County
- (Labour)
- Councillor Sally Powell
- London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
- (Labour)
- Councillor Peter Soulsby
- Leicester District
- (Labour)
- Councillor Peter Cocks, CBE
- Cornwall County
- (Liberal Democrat)
- Councillor Tony Prior
- South Somerset District
- (Liberal Democrat)
- Councillor Milner Whiteman
- Bridgnorth District
- (Independent)
Scotland
- Councillor Keith Geddes
- Lothian Region
- (Labour)
- Councillor Jean McFadden
- Glasgow District
- (Labour)
- Councillor Marcus Humphrey
- Grampian Region
- (Conservative)
Local authority capital expenditure on Education
| |||||||
£000s
| |||||||
LEA
| 1979–80
| 1982–83
| 1985–86
| 1988–89
| 1989–90
| 1990–91
| 1991–92
|
| Barking and Dagenham | 1,077 | 2,952 | 1,785 | 2,330 | 1,765 | 2,073 | 7,249 |
| Barnet | 1,553 | 3,499 | 2,909 | 5,139 | 2,343 | 5,255 | 2,300 |
| Bexley | 1,642 | 1,192 | 1,883 | 3,528 | 3,870 | 2,666 | 2,365 |
| Brent | 1,921 | 1,478 | n/a | 6,343 | 10,644 | 6,447 | 3,727 |
| Bromley | 1,310 | 1,109 | 2,949 | 6,873 | 6,280 | 5,527 | 7,215 |
| Croydon | 514 | 1,168 | 2,526 | 6,770 | 15,947 | 15,764 | 8,439 |
| Ealing | 2,165 | 2,270 | 3,903 | 2,208 | 5,947 | 2,816 | 1,926 |
| Enfield | 1,453 | 786 | 2,128 | 5,287 | 7,740 | 20,457 | 16,146 |
| Haringey | 2,782 | 3,798 | 5,166 | 4,443 | 5,020 | 1,339 | 2,047 |
| Harrow | 775 | 1,252 | 1,343 | 5,447 | 5,408 | 3,057 | 3,538 |
| Havering | 714 | 580 | 2,158 | 3,752 | 5,398 | 7,618 | 4,848 |
| Hillingdon | 1,781 | 1,856 | 2,025 | 8,487 | 15,324 | 4,958 | 1,717 |
- Councillor Peter Peacock
- Highland Region
- (Independent)
- Councillor Clive Sneddon
- North East Fife District
- (Liberal Democrat)
Wales
- Councillor Keith Griffiths
- Gwent County Council
- (Labour)
- Councillor Bill Hughes
- Swansea City Council
- (Conservative)
- Councillor Jill Evans
- Rhondda Borough Council
- Mid Glamorgan County Council
- (Plaid Cymru)
Northern Ireland
- Councillor Simpson Gibson
- Ards Borough Council
- (UDUP)
- Alderman Sean Neeson
- Mayor of Carrickfergus
- (Alliance Party)
Education
Adult Literacy
To ask the Secretary of State for Education if he will give details of his Department's planned funding for schemes to improve adult literacy in 1992–93 and 1993–94.
In 1992–93 and 1993–94, the Department for Education has provided £3.751 million and £3.815 million respectively in grant to the adult literacy and basic skills unit for its work on adult literacy and basic skills, including £700,000 in each year for the Basic Skills at Work programme. The Department has also made available a further £250,000 in 1993–94 in support of the new family literacy initiative.
Capital Expenditure
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what was the capital expenditure on education by each local authority in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89.
The information requested is in the table.
LEA
| 1979–80
| 1982–83
| 1985–86
| 1988–89
| 1989–90
| 1990–91
| 1991–92
|
| Hounslow | 1,623 | 4,891 | 2,527 | 5,957 | 10,260 | 5,300 | 5,304 |
| Kingston upon Thames | 944 | 1,616 | 3,925 | 9,012 | 2,973 | 4,144 | 4,213 |
| Merton | 972 | 768 | n/a | 3,286 | 9,273 | 10,861 | 3,955 |
| Newham | 3,939 | 3,684 | 5,002 | 7,316 | 10,188 | 7,128 | 10,662 |
| Redbridge | 1,689 | 919 | 2,027 | 4,136 | 5,900 | 5,842 | 3,264 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 1,323 | 1,366 | 869 | 1,221 | 2,476 | 3,010 | 2,946 |
| Sutton | 225 | 456 | 1,934 | 3,389 | 5,443 | 7,536 | 7,292 |
| Waltham Forest | 1,780 | 2,828 | 2,128 | 6,477 | 11,853 | 6,973 | 3,441 |
| GLC/ILEA | 23,158 | 19,232 | 33,174 | 30,309 | 50,780 | — | — |
| Corporation of London | — | — | — | — | — | 18,181 | — |
| Camden | — | — | — | — | — | 1,256 | 2,819 |
| Westminster | — | — | — | — | — | 1,301 | 1,848 |
| Greenwich | — | — | — | — | — | 1,909 | 1,501 |
| Hackney | — | — | — | — | — | 1,492 | 1,203 |
| Hammersmith & Fulham | — | — | — | — | — | 2,169 | 2,071 |
| Islington | — | — | — | — | — | 3,872 | 1,947 |
| Kensington & Chelsea | — | — | — | — | — | 5,046 | 2,798 |
| Lambeth | — | — | — | — | — | 894 | 1,587 |
| Lewisham | — | — | — | — | — | 1,522 | 1,534 |
| Southwark | — | — | — | — | — | 1,088 | 2,159 |
| Wandsworth | — | — | — | — | — | 3,818 | 4,306 |
| Tower Hamlets | — | — | — | — | — | 19,602 | 17,103 |
| Birmingham | 6,033 | 11,396 | 9,880 | 5,511 | 10,663 | 14,121 | 14,507 |
| Coventry | 4,403 | 4,423 | 8,236 | 12,852 | 19,705 | 11,415 | 6,877 |
| Dudley | 1,695 | 2,505 | 4,281 | 4,230 | 5,549 | 4,640 | 6,667 |
| Sandwell | 2,210 | 2,059 | 3,013 | 2,228 | 5,703 | 4,352 | 2,740 |
| Solihull | 1,182 | 810 | 816 | 2,691 | 4,191 | 3,275 | 3,389 |
| Walsall | 3,834 | 5,237 | 2,297 | 3,181 | 5,712 | 2,957 | 2,447 |
| Wolverhampton | 4,933 | 3,264 | 2,562 | 3,907 | 3,551 | 2,189 | 2,631 |
| Knowsley | 775 | 825 | 2,205 | 1,562 | 2,869 | 2,885 | 1,297 |
| Liverpool | 3,818 | 5,275 | 8,697 | 10,818 | 4,163 | 3,371 | 2,477 |
| St. Helens | 2,664 | 3,063 | 1,812 | 2,395 | 2,244 | 4,530 | 7,084 |
| Sefton | 1,281 | 878 | 1,648 | 1,909 | 3,362 | 4,854 | 3,636 |
| Wirral | 1,478 | 3,507 | 2,826 | 5,285 | 3,629 | 4,135 | 4,630 |
| Bolton | 1,552 | 4,736 | 1,141 | 3,403 | 4,645 | 3,683 | 1,530 |
| Bury | 3,599 | 1,214 | 1,053 | 1,082 | 1,832 | 1,324 | 1,085 |
| Manchester | 3,817 | 8,417 | 10,871 | 12,399 | 14,385 | 6,184 | 6,907 |
| Oldham | 1,971 | 1,997 | 1,957 | 2,636 | 3,932 | 4,701 | 10,989 |
| Rochdale | 2,709 | 1,378 | 1,816 | 2,784 | 4,003 | 4,640 | 7,362 |
| Salford | 3,299 | 1,882 | 2,412 | 4,429 | 6,579 | 4,868 | 3,651 |
| Stockport | 1,098 | 1,808 | 1,371 | 3,287 | 5,464 | 3,123 | 2,552 |
| Tameside | 2,237 | 2,090 | 1,356 | 2,738 | 2,591 | 2,250 | 1,949 |
| Trafford | 728 | 664 | 1,739 | 1,633 | 6,795 | 11,207 | 5,333 |
| Wigan | 2,911 | 5,456 | 2,021 | 3,984 | 2,369 | 3,980 | 5,322 |
| Barnsley | 2,633 | 540 | 1,068 | 1,940 | 2,733 | 2,011 | 1,910 |
| Doncaster | 1,979 | 1,667 | 656 | 1,269 | 1,651 | 478 | 410 |
| Rotherham | 2,152 | 1,803 | 1,172 | 3,072 | 3,020 | 1,976 | 1,331 |
| Sheffield | 2,528 | 7,257 | 9,125 | 21,767 | 13,393 | 2,128 | 6,302 |
| Bradford | 2,306 | 7,105 | 10,234 | 12,074 | 14,388 | 10,019 | 12,505 |
| Calderdale | 1,597 | 1,066 | 1,134 | 3,338 | 4,845 | 2,149 | 2,153 |
| Kirklees | 5,235 | 5,902 | 7,565 | 5,859 | 4,752 | 4,779 | 4,463 |
| Leeds | 6,544 | 20,039 | 10,308 | 19,478 | 16,468 | 10,903 | 20,429 |
| Wakefield | 2,443 | 3,174 | 2,370 | 5,918 | 6,237 | 4,537 | 3,299 |
| Gateshead | 2,201 | 2,241 | 1,721 | 4,213 | 5,753 | 4,384 | 5,078 |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | 2,068 | 3,602 | 3,147 | 8,074 | 6,086 | 2,520 | 3,387 |
| North Tyneside | 1,686 | 968 | 2,248 | 3,176 | 1,783 | 2,122 | 1,963 |
| South Tyneside | 3,252 | 3,809 | 3,887 | 3,778 | 5,912 | 4,650 | 4,584 |
| Sunderland | 4,156 | 2,922 | 3,357 | 7,594 | 6,512 | 4,229 | 4,223 |
| Isles of Scilly | 17 | 2 | 8 | 56 | 143 | 212 | 50 |
| Avon | 2,879 | n/a | 6,773 | 9,682 | 11,049 | 10,539 | 15,323 |
| Bedfordshire | 5,207 | 2,883 | 3,705 | 5,460 | 7,556 | 3,219 | 1,872 |
| Berkshire | 5,900 | 8.604 | 11,932 | 26,090 | 20,203 | 10,662 | 7,357 |
| Buckinghamshire | 5,902 | 6,335 | 12,292 | 8,606 | 12,274 | 13,941 | 13,312 |
| Cambridgeshire | 7,980 | 6,596 | 9,268 | 17,128 | 22,488 | 16,232 | 22,713 |
| Cheshire | 12,069 | 8,465 | 9,434 | 28,455 | 24,159 | 10,778 | 16,465 |
| Cleveland | 5,582 | 9,463 | 4,816 | 6,877 | 6,812 | 6,643 | 4,954 |
| Cornwall | 5,646 | 5,648 | 3,998 | 7,386 | 9,021 | 12,333 | 11,435 |
| Cumbria | 2,232 | 2,678 | 5,152 | 5,913 | 9,005 | 8,306 | 10,100 |
| Derbyshire | 6,194 | 10,447 | 9,311 | 15,341 | 20,754 | 16,357 | 14,459 |
| Devon | 8,351 | 10,560 | 7,802 | 13,322 | 20,154 | 26,053 | 32,599 |
| Dorset | 4,253 | 6,464 | 5,758 | 6,481 | 6,547 | 8,900 | 13,195 |
| Durham | 4,560 | 3,573 | 3,503 | 4,785 | 6,233 | 5,822 | 7,159 |
| East Sussex | 3,602 | 8,136 | 7,361 | 13,994 | 16,542 | 13,937 | 17,275 |
| Essex | 12,489 | 9,471 | 12,760 | 23,950 | 26,260 | 19,713 | 23,992 |
| Gloucestershire | 3,678 | 3,179 | 8,963 | 9,211 | 10,030 | 11,956 | 10,569 |
| Hampshire | 15,238 | 12,018 | 20,369 | 34,210 | 30,552 | 33,101 | 25,013 |
| Hereford and Worcester | 4,665 | 4,706 | 4,441 | 7,315 | 9,450 | 11,919 | 10,656 |
| Hertfordshire | 5,459 | 6,242 | 12,587 | 21,138 | 14,989 | 14,040 | 14,091 |
LEA
| 1979–80
| 1982–83
| 1985–86
| 1988–89
| 1989–90
| 1990–91
| 1991–92
|
| Humberside | 7,543 | 9,835 | 7,537 | 12,380 | 11,427 | 10,291 | 8,578 |
| Isle of Wight | 1,588 | 931 | 1,280 | 2,433 | 2,021 | 2,712 | 3,299 |
| Kent | 13,601 | 8,196 | 7,786 | 16,121 | 19,446 | 18,956 | 24,964 |
| Lancashire | 8,281 | 13,081 | 14,387 | 17,383 | 19,272 | 20,675 | 20,255 |
| Leicestershire | 7,672 | 9,166 | 11,948 | 14,852 | 12,998 | 13,282 | 12,543 |
| Lincolnshire | 3,633 | 6,101 | 8,078 | 7,894 | 7,375 | 11,667 | 18,463 |
| Norfolk | 5,555 | 6,707 | 6,453 | 8,213 | 7,982 | 6,936 | 6,152 |
| North Yorkshire | 6,092 | 4,290 | 7,403 | 9,557 | 8,193 | 5,586 | 5,460 |
| Northamptonshire | 5,539 | 4,883 | 6,882 | 5,237 | 9,484 | 4,956 | 10,844 |
| Northumberland | 4,254 | 2,442 | 1,822 | 2,410 | 3,102 | 2,969 | 3,966 |
| Nottinghamshire | 8,253 | 6,827 | 5,640 | 7,385 | 8,563 | 6,294 | 6,318 |
| Oxfordshire | 2,837 | 4,519 | 6,946 | 11,034 | 11,085 | 11,583 | 3,524 |
| Shropshire | 4,157 | 2,889 | 2,761 | 5,274 | 5,565 | 6,561 | 7,384 |
| Somerset | 4,199 | 3,950 | 3,690 | 5,090 | 8,970 | 7,777 | 5,770 |
| Staffordshire | 12,976 | 11,421 | 10,905 | 9,532 | 11,104 | 8,949 | 10,160 |
| Suffolk | 5,920 | 4,161 | 6,089 | 11,684 | 10,511 | 12,377 | 11,109 |
| Surrey | 6,547 | 9,281 | 15,164 | 24,982 | 26,536 | 17,896 | 17,366 |
| Warwickshire | 3,539 | 1,804 | 2,945 | 3,879 | 5,339 | 5,618 | 3,602 |
| West Sussex | 3,051 | 4,310 | 10,420 | 9,757 | 11,882 | 17,028 | 14,753 |
| Wiltshire | 3,810 | n/a | 5,782 | 4,829 | 7,607 | 9,483 | 10,009 |
Note: Details are taken from the Department of the Environment's Capital Payment Return forms, and cover expenditure on schools, polytechnics, further education, youth, and other educational services.
Capital Expenditure
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what was the national total of capital expenditure on education by local authorities in England
| Local authority capital expenditure on education by class of authority: | |||||||
| £000s | |||||||
| 1979–80 | 1982–83 | 1985–86 | 1988–89 | 1989–90 | 1990–91 | 1991–92 | |
| (i) Non Metropolitan Districts | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| (ii) County Councils | 241,670 | 240,264 | 304,151 | 455,326 | 492,683 | 456,259 | 477,108 |
| (iii) Metropolitan Districts | 99,007 | 134,979 | 132,002 | 196,494 | 217,469 | 165,569 | 177,099 |
| (iv) London Boroughs | 53,340 | 57,700 | 80,361 | 131,710 | 194,832 | 172,740 | 143,470 |
| (v) City of London | — | — | — | — | — | 18,181 | — |
| Total | 394,017 | 432,943 | 516,514 | 783,530 | 904,984 | 812,749 | 797,677 |
Notes:
1. Details are taken from the Department of the Environment's Capital education, and other educational services.
2. Figures may not match national totals because of non-returns and later adjustments of local authority figures.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what was the regional total of capital
| Local authority capital expenditure on education by economic planning region | |||||||
| £000s | |||||||
| 1979–80 | 1982–83 | 1985–86 | 1988–89 | 1989–90 | 1990–91 | 1991–92 | |
| 1. South East | 134,761 | 138,626 | 202,963 | 329,485 | 394,178 | 367,709 | 310,288 |
| 2. South West | 32,833 | 29,803 | 42,774 | 56,057 | 73,521 | 87,253 | 98,950 |
| 3. East Anglia | 19,455 | 17,464 | 21,810 | 37,025 | 40,981 | 35,545 | 39,974 |
| 4. West Midlands | 49,627 | 50,514 | 52,137 | 60,600 | 86,532 | 75,996 | 71,060 |
| 5. East Midlands | 32,011 | 37,424 | 41,859 | 50,709 | 59,174 | 52,556 | 62,627 |
| 6. North West | 54,287 | 64,736 | 66,746 | 106,182 | 112,293 | 97,188 | 102,524 |
| 7. Yorkshire and Humberside | 41,052 | 62,678 | 58,572 | 96,652 | 87,107 | 54,857 | 66,840 |
| 8. Northern | 29,991 | 31,698 | 29,653 | 46,820 | 51,198 | 41,645 | 45,414 |
| Total | 394,017 | 432,943 | 516,514 | 783,530 | 904,984 | 812,749 | 797,677 |
Notes:
Details are taken from the Environment's Capital Payment Return forms, and cover expenditure on schools, polytechnics, further education, and other educational services.
(2) Figures may not match national totals because of non-returns and later adjustments of local authority figures.
for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89; and if he will give the breakdown of the total between (i) non-metropolitan district councils, (ii) county councils, (iii) metropolitan district councils, (iv) London boroughs and (v) the City of London.
The information requested is in the table.expenditure on education by the local authorities in England for
(a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89 for each standard English region.
The information requested is in the table.
Pupil-Teacher Ratios
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what is the pupil-teacher ratio in secondary grant-maintained schools and local education authority maintained schools in each local education authority in England and Wales.
The information requested for schools in England is shown in the table. Information on schools in Wales is the responsibility of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales.
| Pupil: teacher ratios in LEA-maintained and self-governing secondary schools in each Local Education in England1 | ||
| LEA | Pupil: teacher ratios in: | |
| LEA-maintained schools2 | Self-governing schools | |
| Corporation of London | — | — |
| Camden | 15·3 | 16·7 |
| Greenwich | 16·3 | — |
| Hackney | 15·7 | — |
| Hammersmith | 15·5 | 15·7 |
| Islington | 17·6 | — |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 13·1 | 15·1 |
| Lambeth | 16·4 | 16·5 |
| Lewisham | 17·2 | — |
| Southwark | 17·5 | 16·6 |
| Tower Hamlets | 13·8 | 16·8 |
| Wandsworth | 13·0 | 15·4 |
| Westminster | 14·7 | — |
| Barking | 16·3 | — |
| Barnet | 15·4 | 14·8 |
| Bexley | 16·7 | 16·9 |
| Brent | 13·9 | 14·5 |
| Bromley | 16·1 | 16·3 |
| Croydon | 16·0 | 16·4 |
| Ealing | 14·8 | 16·0 |
| Enfield | 15·9 | 16·1 |
| Haringey | 14·7 | — |
| Harrow | 16·1 | 14·2 |
| Havering | 15·7 | 16·2 |
| Hillingdon | 15·0 | 16·2 |
| Hounslow | 15·9 | 16·9 |
| Kingston upon Thames | 15·0 | 14·7 |
| Merton | 15·6 | — |
| Newham | 16·2 | 14·3 |
| Redbridge | 16·9 | 16·7 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 16·6 | — |
| Sutton | 15·7 | 16·2 |
| Waltham Forest | 15·0 | 16·3 |
| Birmingham | 16·0 | 16·4 |
| Coventry | 14·5 | — |
| Dudley | 15·3 | 15·6 |
| Sandwell | 15·2 | 14·5 |
| Solihull | 15·9 | — |
| Walsall | 14·8 | 16·2 |
| Wolverhampton | 13·8 | 15·4 |
| Knowsley | 16·6 | 14·3 |
| Liverpool | 15·4 | 14·5 |
| St Helens | 15·3 | — |
| Sefton | 16·0 | — |
| Wirral | 15·5 | 16·0 |
| Bolton | 15·0 | 14·9 |
| Bury | 16·3 | — |
| Manchester | 14·3 | — |
| Oldham | 15·0 | — |
| Rochdale | 15·5 | 15·4 |
| Salford | 14·8 | — |
| Stockport | 16·0 | — |
| Tameside | 16·3 | 16·6 |
| Trafford | 15·3 | 15·8 |
| Wigan | 15·1 | — |
| Barnsley | 16·2 | — |
| Doncaster | 16·0 | — |
| Rotherham | 15·0 | — |
| Sheffield | 14·9 | 16·7 |
| Bradford | 16·0 | 15·6 |
LEA
| Pupil: teacher ratios in:
| |
LEA-maintained schools 2
| Self-governing schools
| |
| Calderdale | 15·5 | 16·1 |
| Kirklees | 15·4 | 17·1 |
| Leeds | 15·6 | 16·5 |
| Wakefield | 16·0 | — |
| Gateshead | 15·3 | — |
| Newcastle upon Tyne | 15·1 | — |
| North Tyneside | 15·5 | — |
| South Tyneside | 16·1 | — |
| Sunderland | 15·5 | — |
| Isles of Scilly | 86 | — |
| Avon | 16·2 | 15·9 |
| Bedfordshire | 17·3 | 16·9 |
| Berkshire | 15·9 | 14·8 |
| Buckinghamshire | 16·4 | 15·8 |
| Cambridgeshire | 16·3 | 17·0 |
| Cheshire | 16·4 | 16·2 |
| Cleveland | 15·9 | — |
| Cornwall | 16·4 | — |
| Cumbria | 15·1 | 15·2 |
| Derbyshire | 15·0 | 15·6 |
| Devon | 16·2 | 16·3 |
| Dorset | 16·8 | 16·3 |
| Durham | 16·2 | — |
| East Sussex | 16·0 | — |
| Essex | 16·7 | 17·1 |
| Gloucestershire | 16·3 | 16·4 |
| Hampshire | 16·4 | 16·7 |
| Hereford and Worcester | 16·7 | 18·0 |
| Hertfordshire | 15·8 | 16·0 |
| Humberside | 16·2 | — |
| Isle of Wight | 16·9 | — |
| Kent | 17·0 | 16·9 |
| Lancashire | 16·0 | 15·7 |
| Leicestershire | 15·6 | 17·3 |
| Lincolnshire | 15·8 | 16·4 |
| Norfolk | 15·4 | 15·5 |
| North Yorkshire | 15·6 | — |
| Northamptonshire | 16·3 | 15·6 |
| Northumberland | 16·9 | 14·8 |
| Nottinghamshire | 15·3 | 15·1 |
| Oxfordshire | 16·7 | — |
| Shropshire | 15·1 | 15·9 |
| Somerset | 16·3 | 11·5 |
| Staffordshire | 16·1 | 15·7 |
| Suffolk | 16·1 | — |
| Surrey | 16·1 | 15·3 |
| Warwickshire | 16·2 | 16 0 |
| West Sussex | 16·6 | — |
| Wiltshire | 15·8 | 16·3 |
| England | 15·9 | 16·2 |
1 Based on pupil and teacher numbers in schools in January 1992. Pupil: teacher ratios for schools which are now self-governing appear in the self-governing column of the table. | ||
2 Excluding Sixth Form colleges. | ||
Grant-Maintained Schools
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many representations he has received from hon. Members with regard to the method of auditing of the accounts of grant-maintained schools.
We have received six such representations this year, of which five concerned the possibility of a role for the Audit Commission which was considered during the passage of the Education Act 1993.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education whether he will list all grant-maintained schools operating at the end of the last financial year stating in each case the extent of any financial surplus or deficit.
This information is available only at disproportionate cost.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what grants, other than specific purpose grants, are available to grant-maintained schools.
The grants, other than special purpose grants, that are available to self-governing schools, are annual maintenance grant and capital grant.In addition, self-governing schools are eligible to receive section 11 grant from the Home Office, on whose behalf the Department for Education oversees payments to qualifying self-governing schools.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what were the capital allocations to grant-maintained schools in Cumbria in the financial years 1991–92, 1992–93 and 1993–94.
The following self-governing schools in Cumbria have received capital allocations.
| School | Amount paid in each financial year | ||
| 1991–92 £ | 1992–93 £ | 1993–94 £ | |
| Appleby Grammar School | |||
| Formula Allocation | — | — | 21,220 |
| Brampton Junior School | |||
| Formula Allocation | — | — | 8,925 |
| Cartmel Priory School | |||
| Formula Allocation | — | — | 16,740 |
| Dallam School | |||
| Formula Allocation | — | — | 23,940 |
| Harraby School | |||
| Formula Allocation | — | — | 22,200 |
| Hayton Church of England School | |||
| Formula Allocation | — | 11,760 | — |
| Named Projects | — | — | 170,000 |
| Kirby Stephen School | |||
| Formula Allocation | — | — | 17,820 |
| Kirkbie Kendal School | |||
| Formula Allocation | 15,900 | 27,860 | 28,860 |
| Named Projects | — | — | 950,000 |
| Queen Elizabeth Grammar School | |||
| Formula Allocation | 5,900 | 20,080 | 21,760 |
| Named Projects | — | 102,000 | — |
| Scotby CE Primary School | |||
| Formula Allocation | — | 8,440 | — |
| St. Aidan 's County High School | |||
| Formula Allocation | — | 19,800 | 21,420 |
| Named Projects | — | — | 150,000 |
| The Queen Katherine School | |||
| Formula Allocation | — | 18,380 | — |
| Named Projects | — | — | 50,000 |
| Trinty School | |||
| Formula Allocation | — | 43,360 | — |
| Named Projects | — | — | 150,000 |
| 198,000 | |||
| Warwick Bridge School | |||
| Formula Allocation | — | — | 8,493 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what payments have been made from public funds to heads of grant-maintained schools to attend conferences, seminars, workshops or meetings on grant-maintained status.
The Department has reimbursed head teachers and governors of grant-maintained schools for expenses they have incurred in connection with their attendance at conferences, seminars, workshops and meetings designed to provide factual information on grant-maintained status.The total amount of such expenses reimbursed by the Department in financial year 1992–93 was £15,234. The figure for the current financial year up to the end of September is £15,546.
Kirbie Kendal School
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to his answer of 18 October, Official Report, column 99, what was the purpose of the specific purpose grant (emergency) paid to the Kirbie Kendal school in the last financial year.
The grant was paid in respect of expenditure incurred by the school in connection with meeting the needs of a number of pupils with statements of their speical educational needs.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what (a) contacts his Department has had with and (b) payments it has made to firms of consultants or accountants in respect of the organisation of conferences, seminars or workshops on grant-maintained status or the provision of advice thereon.
The Department has not to date called in consultants or accountants to assist it in, or provide advice on, the organisation of conferences, seminars or workshops desigend to provide factual information on grant-maintained status, and has, therefore, not made payments to any such firms in this respect.The Department does, however, use the services of a number of outside contractors to provide basic support for these events such as secretariat support, venue booking, a mailing service, and the provision of conference equipment.
National Finance
Overseas Staff And Premises
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the cost for the current financial year of his Department's having (a) premises and (b) personnel overseas; and what were the comparable figures for (i) 12, (ii) 24, (iii) 36 and (iv) 48 months ago.
There is no cost to the Treasury for premises overseas. The cost of locally engaged staff overseas in the current financial year is estimated at £80,000. The cost in 1992–93 was £48,520, in 1991–92 £73,253, in 1990–91 £73,974, and in 1989–90 the cost was £61,694.
Ministerial Salaries
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to his answer of 18 October, Official Report, column 14, concerning ministerial salary payments, if he will list each occasion in the last 10 years when payments have been made, giving the amounts in each instance.
The Parliamentary Pensions Act 1984 introduced severance payments for Ministers and other paid office holders in the House of Lords, subject to the conditions set out in the Act. The Ministerial and Other Salaries Order 1991 extended the provision to Commons Ministers and other paid office holders in each House.Although no composite list is kept, we have identified from our records the following occasions on which severance payments have been authorised since 31 July 1984. In each case, the severance payment would have been equal to three months of the relevant ministerial salary, as provided for by the Act.SEVERANCE PAYMENTSDate and Ministerial Post
11 September 1984
- Minister of State for the Environment
26 March 1985
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Environment
3 September 1985
- Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
11 September 1986
- Minister of State, Environment
- Minister of State, Scottish Office
15 June 1987
- Minister of State, Foreign Office
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Trade and Industry
23 July 1989
- Secretary of State, Trade and Industry
- Minister of State, Foreign & Commonwealth Office
24 July 1989
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Energy
25 July 1989
- Lord in Waiting
26 July 1989
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Northern Ireland Office
22 July 1990
- Minister of State, Industry
6 September 1990
- Minister of State, Scottish Office
3 December 1990
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Northern Ireland Office
22 May 1991
- Chief Whip, House of Lords
31 December 1991
- Deputy Chief Whip, House of Lords
11 April 1992
- Secretary of State, Defence
- Secretary of State, Home Office
- Secretary of State, Northern Ireland Office
- Lord Privy Seal and Leader of the House of Lords
14 April 1992
- Minister of State, Defence
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Education and Science
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Energy
- Minister of State, Environment
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Health
- Minister of State, Home Office
- Minister of State, Northern Ireland Office
- Minister for the Arts
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Trade and Industry
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Transport
- Financial Secretary to the Treasury
- Economic Secretary to the Treasury
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Welsh Office
27 April 1992
- Minister of State, Northern Ireland Office
5 May
- Chairman of Committees, House of Lords
- Principal Deputy Chairman of Committees, House of Lords
- Deputy Speaker, House of Commons
25 September 1992
- Secretary of State, National Heritage
11 December 1992
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Education
26 May 1993
- Chancellor of the Exchequer
27 May 1993
- Minister of State, Defence
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Trade and Industry
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Office of Public Service and Science
- Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Transport
6 June 1993
- Minister of State, FCO
24 June 1993
- Minister of State, Northern Ireland Office
16 September 1993
- Chief Whip, House of Lords
Note: Payments to ex-Ministers are made not less than three weeks after the effective date.
Tobacco
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received regarding the retailing of imported tobacco products on which United Kingdom duty has not been paid; what estimates he has of the extent of this retailing; and what action he proposes to prevent it.
Representations expressing concern over the illegal importation of tobacco products have been received from Members of Parliament, tobacco manufacturers and retailers.There are no reliable estimates of the extent of the retailing of illegally imported tobacco products. During the eight-month period January to August, Customs and Excise recorded 464 offences involving 543,791 cigarettes, 7,565 kg of hand-rolling tobacco and 2,809 cigars obtained in other member states of the EC and alleged to be destined for illicit retail sale.The Finance (No. 2) Act 1992 introduced new offences to meet the threat of increased smuggling of revenue goods following the completion of the single market. The offences carry penalties of up to seven years' imprisonment. Customs and Excise have also implemented new control procedures to catch and deter bootleggers, including the recruitment and training of excise verification officers for intelligence-based targeting and enhanced checks at likely outlets for smuggled goods; increasing the excise intelligence resources within the customs investigation division; increased mutual assistance with other member states, including the appointment of liaison officers to work in the Netherlands, Belgium and France; prosecuting or compounding, with, people and businesses found stocking, handling or dealing commercially in illicit excise goods.
Customs and Excise will continue to review the situation in the light of experience.
Tobacco And Alcohol Imports
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his estimate of the amount of tobacco products imported from France and Spain since 1 January which are sold in the United Kingdom in markets, car boot sales and clubs; and if he will make a statement.
No such estimates are available. However, during the eight-month period January to August, Customs and Excise recorded 464 offences involving 543,791 cigarettes, 7,565kg of hand-rolling tobacco and 2,809 cigars obtained in other member states of the EC and alleged to be destined for illicit retail sale.
Income Tax
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the rates of income tax over 25 per cent., and the bands of income, in local currency terms, to which they apply, for France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, the United States of America, Canada, Australia and Japan.
The information requested is as follows.
| France | |
| Rate per cent. | Band of taxable income (francs) |
| 28.8 | 60,690—73,450 |
| 33.6 | 73,450—84,740 |
| 38.4 | 84,740—141,190 |
| 43.2 | 141,190—194,190 |
| 49 | 194,190—229,710 |
| 53.9 | 229,710—261,290 |
| 56.8 | over 261,290 |
Note:
The above bands of income apply to a single person; they are increased according to the taxpayer's family circumstances, e.g., x 2 for a married person with no children, and x 3 for a married taxpayer with two children.
Germany
The German tax rates rise gradually from 19 per cent. to 53 per cent. The effective rate rises above 25 per cent. when taxable income reaches 28,349 DM (single taxpayer) and the top rate of 53 per cent. takes effect when income is over 120,041 DM. These two amounts are doubled for a married couple taxed jointly.
Netherlands
| |
Rate Per cent.
| Band of taxable income (guilders)
|
| 50 | 43,267–86,534 |
| 60 | over 86,534 |
Italy
| |
Rate Per cent.
| Band of taxable income (lire)
|
| 27 | 14,400,000–30,000,000 |
| 34 | 30,000,000–60,000,000 |
| 41 | 60,000,000–150,000,000 |
| 46 | 150,000,000–300,000,000 |
| 51 | over 300,000,000 |
USA
| ||
Rate
| Band of taxable income (dollars)
| |
Per cent.
| Single taxpayer
| Married couple
|
| 28 | 22,101–53,500 | 36,901–89,150 |
| 31 | 53,501–115,000 | 89,151–140,000 |
| 36 | 115,001–250,000 | 140,001–250,000 |
| 39.6 | over 250,000 | over 250,000 |
Note:
The above federal rates only. Most states also levy income tax at varying rates.
Canada
| |
Rate Per cent.
| Band of taxable income (dollars)
|
| 26 | 29,591–59,180 |
| 29 | over 59,180 |
Notes:
1. The above rates are increased by federal surcharges (maximum: 5 per cent. of tax due);
2. All provinces levy income tax, usually as a percentage of federal tax due. For example, the rate in Ontario is 58 per cent., which effectively increases the 26 per cent. and 29 per cent. rates above to 41 per cent. and 45.8 per cent.
Australia
| |
Rate Per cent.
| Band of taxable income (dollars)
|
| 38 | 9,543–16,438 |
| 46 | 16,439–22,831 |
| 47 | over 22,831 |
Japan
| |
Rate Per cent.
| Band of taxable income (yen)
|
| 30 | 6,000,000–10,000,000 |
| 40 | 10,000,000–20,000,000 |
| 50 | over 20,000,000 |
Notes: Local income taxes (maximum: 15 per cent. are also payable.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much tax was remitted or written off as irrecoverable in 1992; and how much of this was PAYE contributions.
The amount of tax remitted or written off as irrecoverable in 1992 was:
| £000s | |
| Year ended 31 October 1992 | 1,694,246 |
| £000s | |
| Year ended 31 October 1992 | 381,172 |
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what proportion of the total sum raised from personal taxation has been paid by the top (a) 1 per cent., (b) 5 per cent. and (c) 10 per cent. of taxpayers in each year since 1979.
The latest estimates are given in the tables. Estimates of income tax liability are based on information reported to tax offices and collected through annual surveys of personal incomes. For years before 1985–86, estimates exclude some investment income on which tax is deducted at source. For years up to and including 1989–90, married couples are counted as one taxpayer and their incomes are combined. Following the introduction of independent taxation, for 1990–91 onwards, husbands and wives are counted separately. Estimates are based on the surveys of personal incomes for years up to 1991–92 and projections of the 1991–92 survey for subsequent years; the latter are therefore provisional.
| Percentage of income tax liabilities | |||
| Year | Top 1 per cent, of taxpayers1 | Top 5 per cent, of taxpayers1 | Top 10 per cent, of taxpayers1 |
| 1978–79 | 11 | 24 | 34 |
| 1983–84 | 11 | 26 | 36 |
| 1984–85 | 12 | 26 | 38 |
| 1985–86 | 13 | 27 | 38 |
| 1986–87 | 14 | 29 | 39 |
| 1987–88 | 15 | 30 | 41 |
| 1988–89 | 15 | 31 | 42 |
| 1989–90 | 15 | 31 | 42 |
| 1990–91 | 15 | 31 | 42 |
| 1991–92 | 16 | 33 | 43 |
| 1992–932 | 17 | 34 | 45 |
| 1993–942 | 17 | 34 | 45 |
| 1 Married couples and single people for years prior to 1990–91. | |||
| 2 Provisional. | |||
Value Added Tax
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what additional revenue would be generated by extending VAT to newspapers, books and magazines.
The publication "Tax Ready Reckoner and Tax Reliefs" shows the cost of not applying VAT at the standard rate to those goods currently zero-rated. For books, newspapers and magazines the figure for 1993–94 is £1·1 billion. This figure makes no allowance for changes in behaviour.
| Cash limits on Votes | ||||
| Class | Vote | Accounting Department | Description of expenditures | Amount £ thousands |
| XIX | 1 | Cabinet Office | Cabinet Office: Other services | 868 |
Social Security
Social Security Fraud
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is his estimate of the amount of social security fraud which could be prevented by a national photo identity card using modern technology to prevent forgery.
It is not possible to estimate the full impact of identity cards on reducing benefit fraud as many social security frauds arise from misrepresentation of the facts rather than false identity. The issue of national identity cards is a matter for the Home Office.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much could be raised by putting VAT on (a) the clothes and (b) the footwear of small people including children.
[holding answer 25 October 1993]: The publication "Tax Ready Reckoner and Tax Reliefs" shows that the estimated cost of not standard rating children's clothing and footwear was £600 million in 1993–94. This figure makes no allowance for changes in behaviour if the tax were imposed.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what is his estimate of the sum that would be raised in the next financial year by imposing VAT on domestic air fares at the standard rate;(2) what is his estimate of the sum that would be raised in the next financial year by imposing VAT on bus fares at the standard rate.
[holding answer 26 October 1993]: Table 9 of the publication "Tax Ready Reckoner and Tax Reliefs" published by HM Treasury in July 1993 provides an estimate of £1,150 million for the cost of zero-rating domestic passenger transport in 1993–94. Very roughly, around £450 million of this is in respect of bus fares; around £150 million is in respect of air fares. These figures make no allowance for the likely behavioural response to applying VAT at the standard rate to these items.
End-Year Flexibility Schemes
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the entitlements for 1993–94 resulting from the carry forward of the capital and running costs underspends allowed under the end-year flexibility schemes.
[pursuant to his reply 14 July, 1993, c. 512–18]. The last entry in the table "Cash limits on Votes" shown in columns 515–16 should have read:
Child Support Agency
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what steps are taken to ensure that, when a maintenance assessment is calculated, the Child Support Agency takes into full account the settlement of financial affairs made in the courts between former partners.
Calculation of maintenance by the Child Support Agency is based on the current needs of children, and the current income and outgoings of their parents. The maintenance formula which the agency uses, while not making any direct allowance for capital or property settlements, does take account of the practical consequences of such agreements, since the current housing costs of absent parents are allowed for in calculating their maintenance liability, and a capital settlement may affect the assessable income both of the absent parent and of the parent with care. In such cases, where the practical outcome is that the absent parent has higher costs or lower income, his maintenance liability will consequently be less.
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what assessment his Department has made of the performance of the Child Support Agency in the first six months of its operation since April.
The Child Support Agency is still a new business. Ministers and officials of the Department meet the chief executive regularly to discuss the agency's performance. The agency has made a determined start on its important task of ensuring that more children receive more maintenance more regularly.
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what number of maintenance assessments his Department has set as a target for the Child Support Agency to handle in the first 12 months of operation; and what other performance targets have been set.
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has set a limited range of targets for 1993–94 which are set out in the agency's published business plan. They are:
60 per cent. of people with the care of children making eligible applications to the CSA to have maintenance arranged;
annual benefit savings of £530 million;
to maintain the Agency's resources so as to deliver its Business Plan within a total budget of £115 million;
65 per cent. of clients to regard the service as satisfactory, as measured by an independent national survey;
to meet a set of milestone targets which relate to major initiatives.
Accommodation. Open Child Support Agency Centre at Birkenhead and Plymouth by 31 October 1993.
Recruitment and training. Recruit and train sufficient numbers of staff to begin operations at Birkenhead and Plymouth Centres by 31 October 1993.
Staff resources. Develop further the complementing system in the light of live running to inform proposals for staff in the 1994 Public Expenditure Survey.
Child Support Computer System. Implement by 30 June 1993 Release 1·1 of the Child Support Computer System.
Service planning. Child Support Agency Centres and Divisions to produce service plans in time to inform the 1994 Public Expenditure Survey.
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) in how many cases considered by the Child Support Agency at the latest date for which figures are available the parent with care has declined to reveal details of the absent parent or to sign the authorisation; in how many of these the explanation has been accepted by the Child Support Agency and no further proceedings taken; and in how many cases investigations are continuing;(2) how many cases there have been at the latest available date for which figures are available where the parent with care is a man; and what percentage these represent of the total number of cases dealt with by the Child Support Agency;(3) how many absent parents have appealed against the sum fixed for maintenance by the Child Support Agency; and what percentage this is of the total number of such assessments issued;
(4) how many and what percentage of the total number of Child Support Agency authorisation forms signed at the latest date for which figures are available have been signed by a parent with care in receipt of income support;
(5) how many completed maintenance assessments and what percentage of the total so completed relate to cases where the parent with care is in receipt of income support at the latest date for which figures are available;
(6) what is the average period between the issue of an inquiry form to a parent with care and the fixing by the Child Support Agency of the sum to be paid in maintenance by an absent parent;
(7) what is his best estimate of the administrative cost of processing an individual case by the Child Support Agency from the initial reference of the parent with care to the final assessment of the absent parent's maintenance payment and of the average collection costs in a full year;
(8) what estimate he can give of the administrative costs of the Child Support Agency in the first year of its operation;
(9) how many cases there have been at the latest date for which figures are available in which there has been a deduction from income support because of a refusal by a parent with care to supply information about an absent parent;
(10) in how many cases considered by the Child Support Agency, at the latest date for which information is available, the absent parent has disputed parenthood; and in how many of these cases court proceedings to establish parenthood have been instituted or are pending;
(11) how many maintenance assessments have been issued (a) in total and (b) in each of the Child Support Agency's regional centres at the latest date for which figures are available;
(12) what estimate he can give of the average sum assessed for maintenance by the Child Support Agency where there is (a) one child, (b) two children and (c) more than two children at the latest date for which such figures are available;
(13) how many authorisation forms have been signed by parents with care (a) in total and (b) in each of the Child Support Agency's regional centres, respectively, at the latest available date for which figures are available;
(14) how many staff are presently employed by the Child Support Agency (a) in total, (b) at headquarters and (c) at each of the regional centres.
The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for Ros Hepplewhite, the chief executive. She will write to the hon. Member and a copy will be placed in the Library.
Letter from Ros Hepplewhite to Mr. Donald Dewar, dated 27 October 1993:
As Chief Executive of the Child Support Agency it is my responsibility to answer questions about relevant operational matters. I am therefore replying to your recent Parliamentary Questions to the Secretary of State for Social Security about various aspects of the work of the Child Support Agency.
I should perhaps first explain that the information refers to the period 5 April to 30 September 1993 except where otherwise indicated, and that the Agency does not distinguish whether a Parent with Care of children or an Absent Parent is male or female.
You ask about cases where the requirement to co-operate has been an issue. The number of such cases to 30 September 1993 is 6,600, and in 4,900 of these the Agency has accepted that the Parent with Care had good cause not to co-operate in pursuing a maintenance claim. Of those cases in which "good cause" was not accepted, only 22 have been referred to the Benefits Agency for the prescribed benefit reduction.
As regards appeals, at 30 September 1993, 2,825 clients had requested a review of their maintenance assessment, representing 7·7 per cent, of the total number of maintenance assessments in the same period. In addition the Independent Tribunal Service had approached the Agency for a report in 86 appeal cases. The Agency does not distinguish between appeals made by Absent Parents and Parents with Care.
You ask specifically about Income Support claimants. To date, 527,000 Maintenance Application Forms (MAFs) have been issued and of these 385,000 (ie, 73 per cent.) were in respect of parents with care on Income Support, 328,000 MAFs have been returned but the number of these which relate to Income Support clients is not known as this information is not collected. Information on MAFs returned and maintenance assessments completed and broken down by CSA Centre (CSAC) is contained in Annex A.
Information on the time taken to process maintenance applications is not yet available but we anticipate that this will take between 6 and 12 weeks in a straightforward case and longer in more difficult cases.
You ask about the Agency's costs and I should explain that the fees, £44 for the Agency's assessment service and £34 for the collection service, are based on the full economic cost of administering the Agency's services to its clients. The Agency's administrative budget for 1993–94 is £115 million (ie, £95 million in running costs and £7 million in capital costs) and £13 million in other costs. This information was contained in the Agency's Business Plan. No changes have been made to the agreed budget.
With regard to disputed paternity, there have been less than 1,000 cases to date of which fewer than 20 have been referred to the courts to be resolved.
Figures on the average amount of maintenance assessment payments are not yet available. The Child Support Act provides for maintenance to be assessed by means of a standard formula, which will result, on average, in payments of £40-£50 a week. This compares to the £25-£30 a week which was previously the average maintenance payment.
Information on staff employed by the Agency is contained in Annex B.
I hope you will find this reply helpful. A copy will appear in the Official Report and a copy will also be placed in the Library.
Maintenance assessments completed
| |
Year to 30 September 1993
| |
| Belfast CSAC | 3,862 |
| Birkenhead CSAC | 7,582 |
| Dudley CSAC | 7,420 |
| Falkirk CSAC | 7,074 |
| Hastings CSAC | 4,892 |
| Plymouth CSAC | 5,780 |
| Total | 36,610 |
Maintenance assessment forms returned
| |
Year to 1 October 1993
| |
| Belfast CSAC | 68,100 |
| Birkenhead CSAC | 61,100 |
| Dudley CSAC | 58,100 |
| Falkirk CSAC | 56,700 |
| Hastings CSAC | 38,200 |
| Plymouth CSAC | 46,500 |
| Total | 328,700 |
Staffing
| |
Staff employed by the Child Support Agency at 1 October 1993
| |
Number
| |
| CSA Total | 14,594 |
| Headquarters | 231 |
| Birkenhead CSAC | 368 |
| Dudley CSAC | 512 |
| Falkirk CSAC | 439 |
| Hastings CSAC | 568 |
| Plymouth CSAC | 363 |
| Belfast CSAC2 | 431 |
1 This figure includes CSA Local Office and 723 part-time staff. | |
2 This figure represents those staff in Belfast who deal with cases from Great Britain. They are Northem Ireland Civil Servant and do not appear in the total Agency figures shown above. | |
Household Income
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what are the median incomes for the top, ninth, eighth, seventh and sixth deciles, before and after housing costs for the years 1979 and 1990–91, in terms of net equivalised household income.
The information is provided in the tables.
| Median net equivalised household income of top five deciles | |||||
| (£ per week—April 1993 prices) | |||||
| Year | Decile Group Medians | ||||
| Decile 6 | Decile 7 | Decile 8 | Decile 9 | Decile 10 | |
| Before housing costs | |||||
| 1979 | 180 | 202 | 230 | 226 | 349 |
| 1990–91 | 229 | 264 | 313 | 381 | 551 |
| After housing costs | |||||
| 1979 | 157 | 177 | 201 | 233 | 308 |
| 1990–91 | 201 | 235 | 277 | 338 | 498 |
Notes:
1. All figures are subject to sampling error.
Transport
New Rolling Stock
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to come to a consultation on the review of the timing of new rolling stock, pursuant to the West Yorkshire passenger transport authority's letter of 11 October.
My officials will be discussing with the passenger transport executive a number of issues raised in the appraisal. Subject to a satisfactory resolution of those issues, I am hopeful that we will be able to complete our review of the timing of new rolling stock within six weeks.
Vehicle Operator Licensing
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) how many heavy goods vehicles are exempt from goods operator licensing;(2) if he will list each type of vehicle exempt from goods vehicle operator licensing.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to the hon. Member for Leeds, Central (Mr. Fatchett) on Tuesday 26 October, at columns 539–40.
Hgv Drivers
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will institute a review of the regulations governing licences for heavy goods vehicle drivers with insulin-dependent diabetes.
Regulations introduced on 1 April 1991 included insulin treated diabetes as a bar to entitlement to drive large lorries and buses for new applicants and those first treated with insulin after this date. The effect of diabetes on driving is kept under constant reassessment by the honorary medical advisory panel on driving and diabetes mellitus.
Bus Services, London
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what reasons underlie his decision to apply different rules for publication of the terms of commercial contracts between tenderers for contracts with public bodies providing urban bus services inside Greater London and those elsewhere in the United Kingdom.
Different legislation governs the provision of bus services in London from that in the rest of the country.Outside London, the rules for publication of information about bus route contracts are laid down by the Transport Act 1985. Inside London, it is London Transport which is responsible for deciding whether to publish the terms of commercial contracts for the provision of tendered bus services.
London Underground (Safety)
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will set out the statistics he has given in response to the figures presented to him by London Underground Ltd. relating to the impact of its plans, entitled "A Decently Modern Metro", of reductions in capital funding for safety and maintenance of this system at levels below those already indicated by Her Majesty's Government.
We are still discussing with London Underground Ltd.—LUL—its plans for "A Decently Modern Metro", and I cannot comment on future funding levels in advance of the unified budget. Safety on London Underground remains, of course, a top priority for LUL and Government.
Transport Capital Finance
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what was the national total of capital allocations for transport to local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89; and if he will give the breakdown of the total between (i) non-metropolitan district councils, (ii) county councils, (iii) metropolitan district councils, (iv) London boroughs and (v) the City of London;(2) what was the capital allocation for transport for each local authority in England for
(a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89;
(3) what was the national total of capital expenditure on transport by local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89;
and if he will give the breakdown of the total between (i) non-metropolitan district councils, (ii) county councils, (iii) metropolitan district councils, (iv) London boroughs and (v) the City of London;
(4) what was the regional total of capital allocations for transport to the local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89 for each standard English region;
(5) what was the capital expenditure on transport by each local authority in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89;
(6) what was the regional total of capital expenditure on transport by the local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89 for each standard English region.
This information is collected centrally by the Department of the Environment. I refer the hon. Member to the answer given today by my hon. Friend the Member for Banbury (Mr. Baldry), the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Environment.
Rail Franchising Director
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether he will publish a draft of the objectives, instructions and guidance which he would intend to set for the Passenger Railway Franchising Director as provided for under clause 5 of the Railways Bill.
I am today placing copies of a draft in the Libraries of both Houses.
Health
Nursing Home Beds
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list the number of registered nursing home beds in 1991–92 in each health authority in England.
This information is published in the annual summary "Private Hospitals, Homes and Clinics Registered under Section 23 of the Registered Homes Act 1984" which has been placed in the Library.
Regional Health Authorities
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what proposals she has to reduce the number of regional health authorities or change the areas which they cover.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State gave the hon. Member for Leicester south (Mr. Marshall) on 26 October, at column 675.
Nhs Trusts
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what information she has in respect of the number of representations in respect of the recent NHS trusts approved; and how many representations in each consultation were considered (a) to favour trust status, (b) to oppose trust status and (c) to be neutral.
As with all national health service bodies, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has available very wide-ranging information about all key aspects of the running of the NHS trusts in question.
A breakdown of the results of consultation is shown in the table.
Supportive
| Opposed
| Neutral
| |
South Western RHA
| |||
| Plymouth Hospitals | 15 | 7 | 8 |
South East Thames RHA
| |||
| The Medway | 3 | 7 | 17 |
| North Kent Healthcare | 4 | 8 | 21 |
| Queen Victoria Hospital | 987 | 6 | 106 |
| Kent Ambulance | 7 | 2 | 22 |
| South Kent Community Healthcare | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| South East London Mental Health | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Dartford and Gravesham | 5 | 3 | 7 |
East Anglian RHA
| |||
| Norwich Community Health Partnership | 29 | 60 | 7 |
| Norfolk Mental Health Care | 12 | 49 | 4 |
North East Thames RHA
| |||
| Haringey Health Care | 9 | 5 | 10 |
| New Possibilities | 16 | 1 | 11 |
| Mid Essex Community and Mental Health | 10 | 1 | 7 |
West Midlands RHA
| |||
| Hereford Hospitals | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| The George Eliot Hospital | 39 | 9 | 6 |
| Northern Birmingham Community Health | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital | 15 | 7 | 9 |
| Royal Shrewsbury Hospitals | 7 | 8 | 10 |
| South Warwickshire Mental Health Services | 8 | 2 | 3 |
| The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals | 11 | 2 | 6 |
| Worcester Royal Infirmary | 21 | 3 | 6 |
| Hereford and Worcester Ambulance Service | 15 | 2 | 7 |
| Warwickshire Ambulance Service | 28 | 11 | 2 |
| Shropshire Community Health Service | 16 | 6 | 11 |
| North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare | 17 | 3 | 6 |
| South Birmingham Community Health | 8 | 6 | 21 |
| Solihull Healthcare | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| City Hospitals | 8 | 6 | 22 |
| Birmingham Women's Health Care | 7 | 6 | 17 |
| Birmingham Heartlands Hospital | 48 | 0 | 11 |
Oxford RHA
| |||
| Kettering General Hospital | 8 | 9 | 13 |
| Rockingham Forest | 6 | 9 | 15 |
| Northampton Community Healthcare | 4 | 8 | 11 |
| Northampton General Hospital | 8 | 12 | 27 |
| Oxfordshire Community Health | 10 | 6 | 38 |
| Oxford Mental Healthcare | 9 | 7 | 34 |
| Oxfordshire Ambulance | 4 | 6 | 14 |
| Churchill John Radcliffe | 15 | 14 | 29 |
| Stoke Mandeville Hospital | 12 | 4 | 19 |
North West Thames RHA
| |||
| Riverside Community Health Care | 6 | — | 3 |
Supportive
| Opposed
| Neutral
| |
Northern RHA
| |||
| Bishop Auckland Hospitals | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| Carlisle Hospitals | 13 | 8 | 6 |
| Cheviot and Wansbeck | 13 | 7 | 4 |
| City Hospitals Sunderland | 10 | 12 | 4 |
| Darlington Memorial Hospital | 4 | 9 | 8 |
| North Durham Acute Hospitals | 10 | 13 | 9 |
| Community Health Care, North Durham | 9 | 11 | 6 |
| North Lakeland Healthcare | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Hartlepool and Peterlee Hospitals | 3 | 8 | 4 |
| Hartlepool Community Care | 2 | 8 | 3 |
| North Tyneside Health Care | 11 | 8 | 5 |
| Northumberland Community Health | 9 | 5 | 5 |
| Priority Healthcare Wearside | 10 | 35 | 6 |
| South Durham Health | 6 | 18 | 5 |
Trent RHA
| |||
| Derbyshire Ambulance Service | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| The King's Mill Centre for Health Care Services | 12 | 6 | 9 |
| Leicestershire Ambulance and Paramedic Service | 18 | 7 | 4 |
| Leicestershire Mental Health Service | 13 | 6 | 10 |
| Lincoln District Healthcare | 19 | 5 | 17 |
| Lincoln Hospitals | 15 | 4 | 14 |
| Louth and District Healthcare | 6 | 7 | 10 |
| Community Health Care Service (North Derbyshire) | 9 | 8 | 11 |
| Nottingham Healthcare | 16 | 7 | 13 |
| Pilgrim Health | 18 | 3 | 14 |
| Community Health Sheffield | 17 | 17 | 7 |
| Derbyshire Royal Infirmary | 9 | 7 | 13 |
Yorkshire RHA
| |||
| Dewsbury Health Care | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| East Yorkshire Community Healthcare | 16 | 0 | 8 |
| Hull and Holderness Community Health | 18 | 2 | 7 |
North Western RHA
| |||
| CommuniCare | 10 | 5 | 16 |
| Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care | 10 | 6 | 15 |
| Blackpool, Wyre and Fylde Community Health Services | 11 | 9 | 15 |
| Community Healthcare Bolton | 8 | 11 | 18 |
| Bolton Hospitals | 10 | 23 | 23 |
| Bury Health Care | 37 | 12 | 20 |
| Greater Manchester Ambulance Service | 9 | 16 | 20 |
| Lancashire Ambulance Service | 17 | 11 | 20 |
| North Manchester Healthcare | 16 | 8 | 15 |
| Guild Community Healthcare | 12 | 4 | 6 |
| Preston Acute Hospitals | 12 | 5 | 16 |
| Mental Health Services of Salford | 9 | 4 | 9 |
Supportive
| Opposed
| Neutral
| |
| Sal ford Community Health Care | 11 | 5 | 11 |
| Stockport Healthcare | 12 | 14 | 22 |
| Stockport Acute Services | 14 | 14 | 12 |
| Tameside and Glossop Acute Services | 11 | 5 | 14 |
| Tameside and Glossop Community and Priority Services | 11 | 5 | 21 |
| Blackpool Victoria Hospital | 14 | 13 | 15 |
Mersey RHA
| |||
| West Cheshire | 9 | 2 | 14 |
| Wirral Community Healthcare | 11 | 3 | 9 |
Wessex RHA
| |||
| East Wiltshire Health Care | 6 | 3 | 3 |
| Portsmouth Health Care | 8 | 1 | 6 |
| Salisbury Health Care | 11 | 1 | 6 |
| Swindon and Marlborough | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Winchester and Eastleigh Healthcare | 4 | 1 | 11 |
South West Thames RHA
| |||
| Chichester Priority Care Services | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| North Downs Community Health | 8 | 3 | 7 |
| Kingston and District Community | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| Worthing and Southlands Hospitals | 14 | 6 | 9 |
| Wandsworth Community Health | 7 | 2 | 6 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many trusts have been established; what is their total budget; and what percentage of the NHS total expenditure this accounts for.
The total number of first, second and third wave national health service trusts operational in England in 1993–94 is 292. Trusts do not have specific budgets but obtain much of their income by contracting for patient services. Total forecast income for NHS trusts in 1993–94 is £13.5 billion, representing 44 per cent. of total NHS gross expenditure.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how many health service trusts have provided business plans; and how many of these have been made available to the public or to hon. Members;(2) what plans she has to give hon. Members a statutory right to have access to the business plans of the health service trusts which serve their constituency; and what existing guidelines there are about making such plans available to
(a) hon. Members and (b) the public.
National health service trusts are required to provide the NHS Management Executive with a three-year business plan every year and have done so. They are also expected to make a summary business plan available to the public, including hon. Members, by 31 March each year. The arrangements for making plans available to the public are for individual trusts to determine and no central record of their issue is maintained. There are no plans to give hon. Members statutory rights to access the business plans.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health to whom health service trusts are accountable for their business plans and expenditure outturns; and what plans she has to improve that accountability.
National health service trusts are accountable to the NHS Management Executive for both their business plans and their expenditure outturn. These accountability arrangements are effective and we have no current plans to make any changes.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many NHS staff members serve as (a) non-executive directors and (b) chairs on trust boards in each region.
The regulations governing membership of national health service trust boards disqualify NHS employees from serving as chairmen or non-executive directors of NHS trusts, except that a designated teaching trust will have a non-executive director drawn from a university, who may be an employee of a health service body.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to her answer of 27 July, Official Report, column 826, if she will provide a list of fourth-wave trusts which received grants, indicating the value of the grant, by district health authority.
The successful fourth wave national health service trust applicants are listed by regional and district health authority. Unless otherwise stated, allocations totalling £254,000 will have been made in respect of these applicants. These additional moneys have been made available to cover the following: public consultation, conveyancing and expenditure during the trust's "shadow period".Successful 4th wave NHS Trust applicants listed by regional and district health authority.
West Midlands Regional Health Authority
Herefordshire Health Authority
- Hereford Hospitals
Warwickshire Health Authority
- The George Eliot Hospital
- South Warwickshire Mental Health SS0
Wolverhampton Health Authority
- The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals
Worcester and District Health Authority
- Hereford and Worcester Ambulance Service
- Worcester Royal Infirmary
Warwickshire Health Authority
- Warwickshire Ambulance Service
Shropshire Health Authority
- Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital
- Shropshire Community Health Service
- Royal Shrewsbury Hospitals
North Staffordshire Health Authority
- North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare
Solihull Health Authority
- Solihull Healthcare
West Birmingham Health Authority
- City Hospitals
South Birmingham Health Authority
- Birmingham Women's Health Care
- South Birmingham Community Health
East Birmingham Health Authority
- Northern Birmingham Community Health
- Birmingham Heartlands Hospital1
Oxford Regional Health Authority
Kettering Health Authority
- Kettering General Hospital
- Rockingham Forest
Northampton Health Authority
- Northampton General Hospital
- Northampton Community Healthcare
Oxfordshire Health Authority
- Churchill John Radcliffe
- Oxfordshire Ambulance
- Oxfordshire Community Health
- Oxfordshire Mental Healthcare
Buckinghamshire Health Authority
- Stoke Mandeville Hospital
North West Thames Regional Health Authority
Ealing Hounslow and Hammersmith Health Agency
- Riverside Community Health Care
North East Thames Regional Health Authority
New River Health Authority
- Haringey Health Care
North Essex Health Authority
- Mid Essex Community and Mental Health2
- New Possibilities2
East Anglian Regional Health Authority
Norwich Health Authority
- Norwich Community Health Partnership
- Norfolk Mental Health Care
SOUTH EAST THAMES REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITY
Tunbridge Wells Health Authority
- Queen Victorial Hospital
Medway Health Authority
- Kent Ambulance
- The Medway
- North Kent Healthcare
South East London Health Authority
- South East London Mental HS0
South East Kent Health Authority
- South Kent Community Healthcare
Dartford and Gravesham Health Authority
- Dartford and Gravesham
South West Thames Regional Health Authority
Chichester Health Authority
- Chichester Priority Care Services
South West Surrey Health Authority
- North Downs Community Health
Kingston and Richmond Health Authority
- Kingston and District Community
Worthing Health Authority
- Worthing and Southlands Hospitals
Wandsworth Health Authority
- Wandsworth Community Health
Wessex Regional Health Authority
Swindon Health Authority
- East Wiltshire Health Care
- Swindon and Marlborough
Portsmouth and South East Hampshire Health Authority
- Portsmouth Health Care
Salisbury Health Authority
- Salisbury Health Care
Winchester Health Authority
- Winchester and Eastleigh Healthcare.
South Western Regional Health Authority
Plymouth and Torbay Health Authority
- Plymouth Hospitals
Northern Regional Health Authority
South Durham Health Authority
- Bishop Auckland Hospitals
- Darlington Memorial Hospital
- South Durham Healthcare
East Cumbria Health Authority
- Carlisle Hospitals
- North Lakeland Healthcare
Northumberland Health Authority
- Cheviot and Wansbeck
- Northumberland Community Health
Sunderland Health Authority
- City Hospitals Sunderland
- Priority Healthcare Wearside
North Durham Health Authority
- North Durham Acute Hospitals
- Community Health Care, North Durham
Hartlepool Health Authority
- Hartlepool Community Care
- Hartlepool and Peterlee Hospitals
North Tyneside Health Authority
- North Tyneside Health Care
Trent Regional Health Authority
Southern Derbyshire Health Authority
- Derbyshire Ambulance Service
- Derbyshire Royal Infirmary
North Nottinghamshire Health Authority
- The King's Mill Centre for Health Care Services
Leicestershire Health Authority
- Leicestershire Ambulance and Paramedic Service
- Leicestershire Mental Health Service
North Lincolnshire Health Authority
- Lincoln District Healthcare
- Lincoln Hospitals
- Louth and District Healthcare
North Derbyshire Health Authority
- Community Health Care Service (North Derbyshire)
Nottingham Health Authority
- Nottingham Healthcare
South Lincolnshire Health Authority
- Pilgrim Health
Sheffield Health Authority
- Community Health Sheffield
Yorkshire Regional Health Authority
West Yorkshire Health Authority
- Dewsbury Health Care
East Riding Health Authority
- East Yorkshire Community Healthcare
- Hull and Holderness Community Health
North Western Regional Health Authority
Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Authority
- Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care
- CommuniCare
Blackpool, Wyre and Fylde Health Authority
- Blackpool, Wyre and Fylde Community Health Services
- Blackpool Victoria Hospital
Bolton Health Authority
- Community Healthcare Bolton
- Bolton Hospitals
Bury Health Authority
- Bury Health Care
- Greater Manchester Ambulance Service
North Manchester Health Authority
- North Manchester Healthcare
Preston Health Authority
- Guild Community Healthcare
- Preston Acute Hospitals
- Lancashire Ambulance Service
Salford Health Authority
- Mental Health Services of Salford
- Salford Community Health Care
Stockport Health Authority
- Stockport Healthcare
- Stockport Acute Services
Tameside and Glossop Health Authority
- Tameside and Glossop Acute Services
- Tameside and Glossop Community and Priority Services
Mersey Regional Health Authority
Chester Health Authority
- West Cheshire
Wirral Health Authority
- Wirral Community Healthcare
1 Birmingham Heartlands Hospital is to be reconfigured without the requirement to dissolve the existing Trust under guidance issued in TEL(93)1, copies of which are available in Library. Since this is a minor reconfiguration no additional allocations have been made for conveyancing or expenditure incurred during "shadow period". Therefore, an additional allocation of only £13,000 has been made in respect of this Trust to cover the costs of the public consultation exercise.
2 Both these successful applications are existing trusts reconfiguring with directly managed units. Although the costs of public consultation and conveyancing are covered the applicants are only eligible for half of the allocation made to cover
expenditure incurred during the shadow period. Therefore, additional allocations of only £147,000 have been made in respect of these two applications.
Perioperative Deaths
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans she has to conduct an inquiry into the number and causes of perioperative death of patients; if she will estimate the numbers so dying in each of the last five years; and if she will list the numbers preventable in each of the last five years and the broad preventable causes of death.
The Department of Health already supports the national confidential inquiry into perioperative deaths. Information on the number of people who die following surgery is not available centrally. A table on trends in "avoidable" deaths, 1979–92, for a selected number of conditions is contained in "Health and Personal Social Services Statistics 1992", copies of which are available in the Library. While it would not be possible to prevent every death deemed to be "avoidable", it is expected that a substantial proportion could be prevented.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will make a statement on the findings of the NCEPOD report on the confidential inquiry into perioperative death.
The national confidential inquiry into perioperative deaths—NCEPOD—is an important study for patients and the National Health Service. It provides valuable reassurance about the quality of surgical and anaesthetic care. We welcome the inquiry's conclusion that across the range of specialties covered, patients can rely on excellent standards. Some of the problems identified in previous reports, such as the percentage of consultants involved in decisions on patient care, are improving. There is, however, room for further improvement. For example there is scope for clinicians and local managers in some areas to work together to improve operating facilities. The report also identifies issues for the medical profession which can improve standards of professional practice, such as in the prevention of pulmonary embolism and in the control of fluids in elderly patients.Through careful assessment of clinical standards, this inquiry helps to ensure that the medical profession retains a critical approach to its work. The Government wish to encourage all surgeons and anaesthetists to continue to support NCEPOD, and NHS managers and the profession to act on the results. We expect all doctors to participate in peer review activities, and we provide continuing financial support for medical and clinical audit, as well as for NCEPOD. In these ways, doctors can develop confidence in their clinical performance and identify areas where they can further develop their expertise.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans she has to require contractors to write into contracts a confidential inquiry into perioperative death data requirement.
It is for individual health authorities to establish local health needs and on that basis determine what they include in their contracts.
Junior Doctors
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans she has to ensure that her targets for the reduction of junior doctors' hours are reached.
Our targets for reducing junior doctors' hours are set out in "Junior Doctors: The New Deal", copies of which are available in the Library. It is for local units to develop plans to achieve these targets, but regional task forces support local action, monitor progress and report regularly to the National Health Service Management Executive.We are also providing an extra £12.2 million from central funds this year to establish a further 125 consultant posts targeted to reduce hours and for other local initiatives to promote the new deal. This is in addition to the £24.8 million we are spending this year to support action begun in the past two years.
Footwear
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what guidelines she has on healthy footwear in adults and children.
None.
Anti-Smoking Patches
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what is her policy regarding the availability of anti-smoking patches on the national health service; and if she will make a statement.
We have decided that nicotine patches should not be available on national health service prescription. We do not consider their supply to be a priority for the use of the limited resources available to the national health service. Statutory Instrument 2421—the National Health Service (General Medical Services) Amendment (No. 2) Regulations 1993—which was laid before the House on 11 October, adds a number of nicotine patch products to the list of items which cannot be prescribed by general practitioners.
Community Care
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will give greater account in the system for allocating community care resources for 1994–95 to the assessed needs of people in different areas, relative to the amount of historical provision in the independent sector.
Decisions about the distribution of the community care special transitional grant in 1994–95 will be announced in due course. The movement of this year's grant into personal social services standard spending assessments in 1994–95 will, in itself, mean that an increased proportion of the new resources for community care will be distributed according to SSAs.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps are being taken to co-ordinate the review of the system of allocation of resources for community care for 1994–95 with the review of local authority standard spending assessments.
The standard spending assessment review will be among the factors taken into account when decisions are made about the distribution of the community care special transitional grant in 1994–95.
Sight Tests
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many national health service sight tests paid for by family health service authorities took place in 1992–93 in each regional health authority.
The number of national health service sight tests paid for by family health service authorities in 1992–93 is shown in the table.
| RHA | 1992–93 |
| Northern | 345,890 |
| Yorkshire | 408,800 |
| Trent | 528,080 |
| East Anglia | 222,090 |
| North West Thames | 397,350 |
| North East Thames | 494,040 |
| South East Thames | 406,730 |
| South West Thames | 295,330 |
| Wessex | 348,770 |
| Oxford | 276,510 |
| South Western | 435,370 |
| West Midlands | 640,530 |
| Mersey | 271,730 |
| North Western | 456,360 |
| England1 | 5,527,590 |
| 1 The total may not equal the sum of the components due to rounding. | |
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to her answer of 14 July, Official Report, columns 532–34, if she can now give the final figures for 1992–93 for sight tests.
The figures have been validated, and remain unchanged from those provided in my reply to the hon. Member on 14 July at columns 532–34.
Personal Social Services
To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what was the regional total of capital allocations for personal social services to the local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89 for each standard English region;(2) what was the capital expenditure on personal social services by each local authority in England for
(a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89;
(3) what was the national total of capital allocations for personal social services to local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89; and if he will give the breakdown of the total between (i) non-metropolitan district councils, (ii) county councils, (iii) metropolitan district councils, (iv) London boroughs and (v) the City of London;
(4) what was the capital allocation for personal social services for each local authority in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89;
(5) what was the regional total of capital expenditure on personal social services by the local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89 for each standard English region;
(6) what was the national total of capital expenditure on personal social services by local authorities in England for (a) 1979–80, (b) 1982–83, (c) 1985–86 and (d) each year since 1988–89; and if he will give the breakdown of the
total between (i) non-metropolitan district councils, (ii) county councils, (iii) metropolitan district councils, (iv) London boroughs and (v) the City of London.
This information is collected centrally by the Department of the Environment. I refer the hon. Member to the reply given today by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Environment, my hon. Friend the Member for Banbury (Mr. Baldry).
Gps (Misconduct)
To ask the Secretary of State for Health in what circumstances under which a general practitioner found guilty of serious professional misconduct by the General Medical Council can be allowed to continue to practise; and what assessment she has made of whether patients are sufficiently protected.
It is a matter for the professional conduct committee of the General Medical Council to decide whether a doctor is fit to continue practising after he has been found guilty of serious professional misconduct. Where a finding of serious professional misconduct is made by the professional conduct committee, it may order that the name of the practitioner concerned is erased from the register; that his registration be suspended, or that his continuing registration be dependent upon his compliance with such conditions of practice as the committee may think fit. The professional conduct committee would need to consider each case on its merits having regard to its primary concerns to protect the public and uphold the reputation of the profession.The Government's aim is to ensure that proper controls exist to protect patients against the risk of deficient conduct and professional regulatory bodies like the GMC have an important role to play in safeguarding standards of medical care. Under the terms of the Medical Act 1983, the disciplinary remit of the GMC covers only those offences amounting to serious professional misconduct.A family health service authority has a duty to remove from its medical list the name of any general practitioner whose name has been erased from the medical register, or whose registration has been suspended, following disciplinary proceedings by the GMC.The GMC is proposing to introduce performance procedures which would apply where a doctor's pattern of professional performance was seriously deficient but did not amount to serious professional misconduct. We support the GMC in its aims and will continue to contribute to the discussions about the detail of the proposals.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health in what circumstances it is possible for a general practitioner to continue to provide NHS services after a direction has been made by the General Medical Council that his or her name be erased from the register; and if she will make a statement.
A doctor who is the subject of a decision by the General Medical Council's professional conduct committee to erase his or her name from the register has 28 days in which to appeal against the direction to the judicial committee of the Privy Council. During that period and if there is an appeal, until the appeal is withdrawn or disposed of, the doctor's registration is not affected and he or she is able to continue practising. The professional conduct committee may direct that a doctor's registration should be immediately suspended where it is satisfied that such action is necessary for the protection of members of the public or would be in the best interests of the doctor.A family health services authority has a duty to remove from its medical list the name of any general practitioner whose name has been erased from the medical register, or whose registration has been suspended, following disciplinary proceedings by the GMC.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the speed in dealing with cases of charges of serious professional misconduct at the NHS tribunal and on appeal; and if she will make a statement in relation to a recent case raised with her by the hon. Member for Woolwich.
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State looks to the chairman of the National Health Service Tribunal to deal with references made to the tribunal as speedily as possible within the regulations governing its procedure. The outcome of a hearing of the NHS Tribunal may be that a practitioner is no longer included in a family health service authority list or all such lists. That is a serious matter and the parties must have reasonable time to prepare themselves for the hearing. The tribunal chairman is responsible for ensuring that the proceedings of the tribunal are conducted fairly.The case drawn to my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State's attention by the hon. Member was originally scheduled for hearing in September. Unfortunately the hearing was delayed because of the resignation of the previous tribunal chairman. The case has been relisted for 15 November when it will be heard by the tribunal under its new chairman, Mr. Adrian Whitfield QC.
Regional Administration Costs
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to her answer of 14 April, Official Report, column 616, if she will now make available the final regional administrative costs for 1992–93.
The final regional administrative costs for 1991–92 are unchanged from those given in my reply to the hon. Member on 14 April at column 616.Information for 1992–93 is contained in the annual accounts for health authorities. We are assembling and summarising these accounts in accordance with statutory deadlines. Comprehensive information will be available at the end of November.
General Practioners (Suspensions)
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what consideration she has given to the need for legislation to provide for the suspension of general practitioners from the provision of NHS services.
The Department is currently considering whether there is a need for legislation to provide for the suspension of general medical practioners, in extreme cases, from the provision of national health service services, and the ways in which suspension would be effected.
Sellafield
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the committed effective dose to children in the terrestrial critical group will be for each year of discharge if the proposed liquid and gaseous radioactive discharges from BNFL's Sellafield installation are granted, and whether any children within that critical group will be exposed to doses exceeding the latest National Radiological Protection board's dose constraints of 0.3 mSv.
I have been asked to reply.The estimated committed effective dose to children in the terrestrial critical group from liquid and gaseous radioactive discharges from Sellafield at the proposed authorised discharge limits is 239 uSv—microsievert—per year. This dose, calculated on the basis of pessimistic assumptions, is below the National Radiological Protection Board's recommended annual dose constraint of 300 uSv in respect of discharges from new plant.
Prime Minister
Thorp
To ask the Prime Minister whether he will place the thermal oxide reprocessing plant at Sellafield on the agenda of the European Council special summit in Brussels on 29 October.
No.
Engagements
To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Thursday 28 October.
This morning, I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in the House, I shall be having further meetings later today.
Official Histories
To ask the Prime Minister which further official histories of peacetime events have been commissioned.
I have appointed Professor Alan Milward, professor of economic history at the university of London, London School of Economics, as an official historian with effect from October 1993 to write the official history of the United Kingdom's accession to the European Community.
House Of Commons
Disabled Access
To ask the Chairman of the Accommodation and Works Committee what plans he has to improve access to the House Chamber and Committee rooms for wheelchair bound civil servants.
The general question of access to the House for the disabled is to be considered in the near future by my Committee. I anticipate that the specific issue of access to the Chamber and Committee rooms will be included in our deliberations.
Employment
Youth, Birmingham
To ask the Secretary of State for Employment how many people aged 16 to 17 years in Birmingham are not in employment, not on a youth training scheme and not in full-time education; and what proportion of that age group this represents.
In July 1993, there were 428 unemployed claimants aged 16 to 17 years in the Birmingham travel-to-work area. Information on claimant unemployment by age expressed as a percentage of the workforce in a particular age band, is not available below national level.All 16 and 17-year-olds are covered by the Government's guarantee of an offer of a youth training place, if they are willing to accept YT as a route into employment.
Ethnic Minorities
To ask the Secretary of State for Employment why reference to ethnic minorities has been omitted from the draft plan for European social fund objective 3 1994–99; and if he will make a statement.
It has always been our intention that ethnic minorities should continue to be among the beneficiaries of the European social fund—ESF— supported programmes in the next programming period 1994–99. The draft plan outlines a number of ways in which ethnic minorities may receive help from the ESF.
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Sheep Quota
12.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations she has received on the regulations dealing with sheep quota.
I have received a number of representations about the arrangements for sheep quotas, principally from farmers and landowners.
Minke Whales
13.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations she has made to the Government of Norway about the killing of minke whales in the north Atlantic.
The United Kingdom Government have made it clear, at the highest levels, that we deplore the resumption of commercial whaling.
Dairy Sector
14.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when she will next meet the president of the National Farmers Union to discuss the dairy sector.
A copy of our consultation document on the England and Wales Milk Marketing Board's reorganisation scheme was sent to the NFU last week. My right hon. Friends look forward to receiving the NFU's views in due course.
Veterinary Products
15.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what plans she has for the reform of veterinary products licensing.
I am adapting the licensing system to take account of Community law requirements, including the future systems package, and the deregulation initiative. The core scientific requirements of safety, quality and efficacy will be retained.
Nitrates
16.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food to what extent her Department has taken sufficient steps to lessen the amount of nitrates in watercourses and the water table.
The Department is playing its full part through the promotion of its nitrate-sensitive area policy in keeping the level of nitrate in water at acceptable levels.
Animal Welfare
17.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations she has received concerning EC legislation to protect the welfare of live farm animals during transport.
During the consultation on proposed new Community rules, many representations have been received pressing the Government to seek high standards to protect animals in transport. This is our intention.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations she has made to the European Council of Ministers concerning the implementation of EC directive 91/628 on the protection of animals during transport.
The European Commission has issued proposals for additional rules to protect animals in transport. We are pressing for strong welfare safeguards, based on the high standards which apply in this country.
Tenancy Laws
18.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what steps she intends to take concerning reform of the agricultural tenancy laws; and if she will make a statement.
I have made it clear that we intend to proceed with reform, to the benefit of both landlords and tennants.
Food Processing
19.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what support her Department is giving to food processing companies.
We give help in a number of ways, notably export refunds on manufactured foods, marketing and processing grants, funding of export promotion through Food from Britain, and support to R and D on food processing technology under the Link arrangements.
Farm And Conservation Grant
20.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations she has received concerning the farm and conservation grant scheme; and if she will make a statement.
We regularly receive representations about the farm and conservation grant scheme, usually in relation to individual grant cases. Each representation is carefully considered and, where it is both possible and desirable to do so, taken into account when framing adjustments to the conditions of the scheme.
Days-At-Sea Regulations
21.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will make a statement on the progress of talks over the implementation of days-at-sea regulations.
I have visited a dozen ports in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and met local fishermen and representatives from around 80 organisations associated with fishing. We are now considering the results of these consultations and the results of parallel discussions in Scotland, together with the formal responses we have received from the National Federation of Fishermen's Organisations and from the Scottish Fishermen's Federation, and we shall be announcing our plans soon.
Cattle
22.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what measures are being taken to monitor the causes of infection of cattle by tuberculosis; and if she will make a statement.
A thorough investigation is carried out following every cattle herd breakdown to attempt to identify the source of the infection and any cattle moved on or off the premises are traced and tested if appropriate.Wildlife carcases submitted by the public of a range of animals such as deer and badgers are examined for tuberculosis if local staff or the State Veterinary Service believe useful information may be provided.Badger removal operations are undertaken only where badgers are believed to be involved in the spread of infection to cattle; all badgers killed in these removal operations are examined for tuberculosis.In support of the bovine tuberculosis programme, the Department is funding a field research programme to provide information on the mode of transmission of bovine tuberculosis from badgers to cattle.
Marketing
23.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what steps are being taken to improve the marketing of British horticultural products.
In addition to the promotional activities in which I and my colleagues are pleased to assist, my right hon. Friend has asked me to undertake a specific and intensive survey of horticultural marketing.We are also consulting the industry on our proposals for a new marketing development scheme, and our "continental challenge" initiative with European retailers should open the door to better export performance.
Agricultural Training Board
24.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations she has received concerning the future of the agricultural training board.
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given by my predecessor on 1 April 1993 at column 329 to my hon. Friend the Member for Romsey and Waterside (Mr. Colvin) following the consultation exercise on the future status and operation of the agricultural training board.Nearly 700 responses were received to the consultation document published on 25 September 1992 from a variety of interested organisations and individuals.No subsequent representations have been made to this Department on this issue.
Weeds Act 1959
26.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations she has received regarding the future of the Weeds Act 1959; and if she will make a statement.
In response to our consultation on the future of the Weeds Act 1959, some 1,000 representations were received from individuals and bodies, the majority of which were against repeal of the Act.After careful consideration of these responses by Agricultural Ministers, my noble Friend the Earl Howe announced on 11 October that the Act would be retained. I am pleased that it is perceived as serving a useful purpose.
| Year | Whole-time principal farmers, partners and directors (doing farm work) | Salaried managers | Whole-time family workers | Whole-time hired workers | Total number of whole-time workers |
| 1980 | 136·6 | 6·9 | 19·5 | 121·3 | 284·2 |
| 11993 | 112·9 | 7·1 | 16·6 | 72·1 | 208·0 |
| 1 Provisional results. | |||||
Notes:
Source: June Census of Agriculture and Horticulture each year.
Includes estimates for minor holdings.
Figures exclude;
(i) the wives/husbands of farmers, partners and directors, even though they themselves may be partners or directors.
(ii) seasonal or casual workers.
Coastal Defences
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what proportion of coastal defences exhibit some signs of wear or require structural attention.
In 1992, the National Rivers Authority estimated that in England 2 per cent. of sea defence elements—for example, walls, embankments, groynes—were in need of significant works.
Warble Fly
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will list the number of incidents of warble fly in each year since 1989.
Potatoes
25.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what alternative proposals she has received to the Potato Marketing Board's plan for the future of potato marketing in the United Kingdom.
I have received alternative proposals for modification of the potato marketing scheme from the National Farmers Union.I have also received proposals for the abolition of the scheme from the Potato Processors Association.
27.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the total expenditure (a) in 1992 and (b) to date in 1993 paid to producers by the potato marketing scheme; and what proportion of that was funded by the levy on producers.
For the 1992 crop year—1 July 1992 to 30 June 1993—the total cost of the Potato Marketing Board's —PMB—buying programmes amounted to £20,796,439 of which 92.66 per cent was funded by the levy on producers. For the 1993 crop year commencing on 1 July 1993, the PMB has spent £158,716 to date, all of which has been funded by the levy on producers.
Labour Statistics
28.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is the number of persons employed full time either as farmers or farm workers in England; and what was the figure in 1980.
The number of persons employed full-time either as farmers or farm workers in England in 1980 and in 1993 is shown in the table.
The number of premises with clinical cases recorded in Great Britain is as follows:
| Number | |
| 1989 | 2 |
| 1990 | 1 |
| 1991 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0 |
| 1993 | 107 |
Agricultural Wages Board
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food which International Labour Organisation conventions currently in force relate to the Agricultural Wages Board; when they expire; and what plans she has to renew them.
Those International Labour Organisation conventions which are currently in force and relate particularly to the Agricultural Wages Board are convention 99, concerning minimum wage fixing machinery in agriculture, and convention 101, concerning holidays with pay in agriculture. The conventions do not expire, although periodically signatories have the opportunity to reconsider their adherence. Any decision would be for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Employment.
Broiler Chickens
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what plans she has to improve the welfare of broiler chickens.
The Government's response to the Farm Animal Welfare Council's Report on the welfare of broiler chickens was published in April 1993. The Government accepted that the council recommendations should be taken forward on a Community basis or, where appropriate, used as the basis for revision of the Government's welfare code.
Folic Acid
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what plans she has to ensure that breads, cereals and flours are enriched with folic acid.
Many breakfast cereals and a number of breads are already fortified with folic acid. My Department has written to the relevant trade organisations to encourage them to increase the range of produces fortified with folic acid in line with recommendations of the expert advisory group in its report to the Chief Medical Officer, "Folic Acid and the Prevention of Neural Tube Defects". The response has been positive and some new fortified products have appeared on the market already. We shall keep in touch with the industry on developments.
Fish
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what research she has undertaken into the impact of organophosphate exposure upon fish.
No research has been carried out by my Department into the impact of organophosphate exposure on fish, although the results of work on the toxicity of dichlorvos to shell fish were reported to the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea in 1990.
Birds
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what research has been conducted by her Department on the effect of the organophosphate Fonofos on the United Kingdom bird population.
This Department is currently undertaking research into the effect of seed treatments, including Fonofos, on bird populations as part of its assessment of the environmental hazards of pesticide usage.
Organic Food
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will make a statement on the future of the United Kingdom Register of Organic Food Standards following changes to the structure of Food from Britain.
For the time being Food From Britain retains its responsibility for the United Kingdom register of organic food standards—UKROFS—but the secretariat is about to be relocated within my Department. I value UKROFS' independence and effectiveness and want to maintain these through the decisions that need to be taken about UKROFS' longer-term future.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what measures she intends to take to promote organic farming in the United Kingdom.
The Government are keen to encourage farmers to meet the growing demand from consumers for organic produce. The United Kingdom register of organic food standards was established by Food From Britain with funding from MAFF in 1987.On 10 August, I announced proposals for an aid scheme to farmers in England wishing to convert to organic production methods. It is proposed to launch the scheme this winter and expenditure is planned to rise to £1.5 million by 1995–96. Similar schemes were announced by my right hon. Friends the Secretary of State for Scotland and Wales and my noble Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Northern Ireland.The organic sector can benefit from the group marketing grant scheme, and its successor on which we are currently seeking the views of the industry.In addition to the organic scheme, the broad range of other MAFF support schemes are open to organic farmers. We also spend some £1 million per annum on research and development specifically related to organic agriculture and advice on organic farming from ADAS.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the value of imported organic food produce in (a) real and (b) cash terms for each year since 1980.
This information is not available because import statistics do not distinguish between organic and conventional food.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what percentage of the consumption of organic produce in each EC member state is met from domestic production.
This information is not available.
Driftnets
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) if she will make a statement regarding the level of compliance with EC regulation 245/92 by the United Kingdom and other EC vessels in the north-east Atlantic and the Mediterranean; and if she will make a statement on the adequacy of the monitoring and enforcement measures in force;(2) how she plans to vote on the proposal to extend the deadline for all fishing vessels to comply with EC regulation 245/92, which limits the length of driftnets allowed on one vessel, at the EC Fisheries Council meeting in November;(3) what plans she has to make representions to the European Commission and the Italian Government on the level of enforcement of EC regulation 245/92 in the Italian swordfish driftnet fishery;(4) whether she will promote the fair and consistent implementation of EC regulation 245/92 which limits the length of EC driftnets and oppose the extension of the existing derogation which exempts some French vessels from the restriction until 31 December.
The EC regulation in question is 345/92 of 27 January 1992.A small number of United Kingdom-registered vessels take part in the summer drift net fishery for long-finned albacore tuna which occurs in the north-east Atlantic beyond British fishery limits. Responsibility for monitoring and enforcing the present arrangements rests with the member states whose vessels participate in the fishery or in whole waters the fishery occurs. British sea fishery officers make spot inspections from time to time to check that nets taken on board do not exceed 2.5 km. A derogation exists permitting longer nets for vessels who were fishing in the north-east Atlantic tuna fishery for at least two years before the regulation came into force. However, this expires on 31 December 1993 and no proposal for a continuation of the derogation has been received. No United Kingdom vessels fish in the Mediterranean and I have no information concerning the swordfish fishery referred to.
Hill Livestock Compensation Allowance
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many hill farmers in England have not yet received their hill livestock compensation allowance in respect of 1993.
Of 14,012 claims so far received in England in respect of the 1993 hill livestock compensatory allowances scheme, 396 are still outstanding. This repreents 2.8 per cent. of claims received. Claims are still being received in respect of 1993, albeit in small numbers.
Food Promotion
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what countries United Kingdom food promotion delegates have visited so far this year.
Food From Britain, the United Kingdom's food export promotion organisation, maintains a permanent presence in the key markets of north America, Germany, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain and Belgium.During the current year, FFB has also promoted British food at exhibitions in Japan and Dubai. In the period, Ministers of this Department have visited Turkey, India, Hungary, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay with food promotion and other objectives in view.
Apples
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what measures she intends to take concerning the promotion of British apples.
My ministerial colleaguess and I have been pleased to participate in a number of recent events to promote English apples. On 19 October, I attended the launch of the 1993 main apple season. On Apple Day itself, the Minister was presented with an apple pie and the Parliamentary Secretary in the Commons attended Food From Britain's launch of "Great Food From Britain". On 27 October, the Minister visited the Marden fruit show. In addition, I recently announced my horticultural marketing initiative, one of the key aims of which will be to stimulate United Kingdom consumption of United Kingdom produce—including apples.
Seals
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what measures are being taken to protect and conserve the seal population from the consequences of salmon farming.
[holding answer 27 May 19931: I have been asked to reply.Seals continue to have appropriate protection under the Conservation of Seals Act 1970.
Wales
Family Credit
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many families receive family credit in Wales; and what is this figure expressed as a percentage of all those families eligible for family credit in Wales.
At 30 April 1993, there were an estimated 30,000 claimants in receipt of family credit in Wales. No figures are available for the number of families eligible for family credit.
Income Support
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many (a) men and (b) women are at present in receipt of income support in Wales; and what are the figures expressed as percentage of (i) men between 16 and 64 years and (ii) women between 16 and 60 years respectively.
The latest information available is given in the table:
| Income support beneficiaries in Wales, November 19921 | |||
| Age | Number (thouands) | Per cent. of age group1 | |
| Male | 16.64 | 126 | 14.0 |
| Beneficiaries | 65 and over | 17 | 8.3 |
| Total | 143 | 13.0 | |
| Female | 16–59 | 135 | 16.5 |
| Beneficiaries | 60 and over | 77 | 20.6 |
| Total | 212 | 17.8 | |
Source: Department of Social Security. | |||
1 Beneficiaries include partners of recipients. Dependents aged under 19 and still living with the recipient are not included as information on their gender is not available. | |||
2 Population figures used are for mid-1991. |
Welsh Development Agency
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what consultations he has had with the Welsh Development Agency concerning the implementation of the recommendations of the Committee of Public Accounts in relation to full recovery from employees of costs incurred through excess private mileage.
I take very seriously the criticisms of the Public Accounts Committe. The Goverment's response to its report makes it clear that there should be contributions by individuals to cover the cost of private use. The agency has recognised this and has ensured that the chief executive and other senior executives make appropriate contributions.
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what consultations he has had with the Welsh Development Agency concerning the recommendations in Sir John Caines' report concerning (a) common directorships held by board members and (b) the apppointment of board members involved in construction and property development; and if he will make a statement.
I myself have had none. The WDA has received a copy of the Caines report and would have seen my statement to the House on 19 October.
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales when he expects implementation of the recommendations of the quinquennial financial management and policy review of the Welsh Development Agency 1991–92, that there should be a management statement and new financial guidelines defining delegation of financial authority; and if he will make a statement.
A management statement is in place and the financial guidelines are being revised.
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what consultations he has had with the Welsh Development Agency concerning revisions to the employee handbook (a) in respect of procedures for dealing with conflicts of interest involving employees' families and close personal friends and (b) other respects; what proposals for such revisions have been submitted to him; and when he expects to complete the approval process of such revisions.
None. I understand that the board of the agency is currently considering the revised employee handbook. I expect to see any proposals for changes to terms and conditions when the board has completed its deliberations.
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what consultations he has had with the Welsh Development Agency in relation to the recommendations in Sir John Caines' report to withdraw the facility for WDA staff to sell their cars into the executive car-leasing scheme.
I myself have had no discussions with the WDA. I refer the hon. Member to the agency's response to Sir John Caines' report, a copy of which has been placed in the Library of the House.
Hill Livestock Allowances
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales, pursuant to his answer of 25 October about hill livestock compensatory allowances not yet paid, how many field inspections will be carried out in respect of the claims still unpaid in Wales.
This will depend on the number of queries which cannot be resolved by correspondence.
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many field inspections have been carried out in respect of hill livestock compensatory allowance applications in Wales in 1993 to date.
Up to 30 September 1993, field inspections had been undertaken to validate 5,590 claims for HLCA from both sheep and cattle producers. The number of actual farm visits will have been substantially less than this because inspections of sheep and cattle claims are often carried out during the same visit.
Sight Tests
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many NHS sight tests took place in each financial year since 1984–85.
The number of NHS sight tests paid for by family health services authorities in each year in Wales was as follows:
| Number | |
| 1984–85 | 570,864 |
| 1985–86 | 600,714 |
| 1986–87 | 626,644 |
| 1987–88 | 697,280 |
| 1988–89 | 733,469 |
| 1989–90 | 292,060 |
| 1990–91 | 271,170 |
| 1991–92 | 332,240 |
| 1992–93 | 372,590 |
Scotland
Forestry
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what representations the review group has received on the subject of the privatisation of the Forestry Commission.
Many individuals and organisations have written to Ministers and Government Departments and to the secretary and members of the forestry review group giving their views on issues connected with the work of the group.They did not do so in the knowledge or expectation that their names or their submissions would be published and I therefore do not think it would be right to publish this information.
Most of the representations received have been opposed to the idea of privatisation of the Forestry Commission estate, but the remit of the review group is to look at issues much wider than this.
Ministers have asked the group to review:
the effectiveness of the current incentives for forestry investment, in accordance with the manifesto commitment, and options for the ownership and management of Forestry Commission woodlands,
and to make proposals for changes which would improve the effectiveness of the delivery of the Government's forestry policy objectives, having regard to the Government's other economic and environmental policies.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland when he now expects to receive the report from the interdepartmental working party on the future of the Forestry Commission.
[holding answer 26 October 1993]: Forestry Ministers expect to receive the advice of the forestry review group early next year.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many submissions have been made to date to the interdepartmental working group on the future of the Forestry Commission; and how many of these have favoured privatisation as an option.
Over 300 organisations and 1,350 individuals have made submissions or offered comment direct to the forestry review group. Comment has also been addressed to Ministers and officials in the other departments represented on the group. The issues most commonly raised are access to woodlands, security of timber supplies and the environment. In so far as these issues might be affected by privatisation, virtually all commentators are opposed.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what progress has been made towards publishing the United Kingdom's national forestry plan.
The Forestry Commission is co-ordinating the publication and work is well advanced. The plan will draw together the various strands of the Government's present forestry policy and programmes. Since we would not wish the plan to pre-empt the findings of the forestry review group or to prejudice our decisions on its recommendations, it will not be practical to go beyond that.We have concluded, therefore, that there would be little benefit in consulting publicly before publishing the plan. Instead, we will be inviting comments on the plan after it has been published.
Information Scheme
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland whether he proposes a redeployment of Scottish Office staff across Scotland in connection with the Government's new scheme of information points.
My Department has no plans to redeploy Scottish Office staff across Scotland in connection with the Government's new scheme of information points. The 20 information points already opened are located in existing departmental offices and no additional staff were required.
Hill Livestock Compensatory Allowances
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many hill farmers in Scotland have not yet received their hill livestock compensatory allowance in respect of 1993.
Of 17,437 claims so far received in Scotland in respect of the 1993 HLCA scheme, 94 claims are still outstanding. This represents 0.5 per cent. of claims received. A small number of claims are still being received in respect of 1993.
Fish Conservation
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland when he received the fish conservation report from the Scottish Federation of Fishermen's Organisaations.
On 30 September 1993.
Smoke Alarms
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what funding is available to assist those with hearing impairment to purchase special smoke alarms for their homes; and if he will make a statement.
[holding answer 25 October 1993]: I refer to the reply I gave to the hon. Member on Tuesday 19 October 1993, Official Report, columns 37–38.
Farming
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) how many farm holdings in (a) Scotland and (b) East Lothian, are in the less-favoured area and the non-less-favoured area respectively; and how many holdings include land in both the less-favoured area and non-less-favoured area;(2) what is the total area of agricultural land in
(a) Scotland and (b) East Lothian inside or outside the less-favoured area, respectively.
[holding answer 27 October 1993]: The information requested as it relates to total agricultural areas is currently available only from the agricultural census. The table gives the figures as recorded at the 1992 census:
| Less favoured area | Non-less favoured area | |
| Scotland | ||
| —holdings | 23,326 | 8,251 |
| —agricultural area (hectares) | 5,200,279 | 684,266 |
| East Lothian | ||
| —holdings | 47 | 374 |
| —agricultural area (hectares) | 18,819 | 37,610 |
Ancient Monuments
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland when the first national survey of the scheduled ancient monuments in Scotland was completed; when and in what form it will be published; if he will list the damage identified by the survey to scheduled ancient monuments in Scotland from natural forces, vegetation and animals; and what moneys he has allocated during this financial year to tackle the damage identified in the first national survey of scheduled ancient monuments.
[holding answer 25 October 1993]: The subject of the question relates to matters undertaken by Historic Scotland. I have asked its chief executive, Mr. Graeme Munro, to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from G. N. Munro to Mr. Nigel Griffiths, dated 28 October 1993:
Sir Hector Monro MP, the Minister for Agriculture and Environment at The Scottish Office has asked me to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking when the first national survey of scheduled ancient monuments in Scotland was completed and when and in what form it would be published.
The survey of scheduled ancient monuments is not a "one-off" project with a definite end when a final report can be prepared. Because it involves the continuous monitoring by Historic Scotland's monument wardens on a three to four year cycle of all the scheduled monuments (including the 300 new sites scheduled each year) the results are constantly being updated. The first round of visits by wardens has not yet been completed in three areas—Shetland, Orkney and West Strathclyde (Argyll and Bute).
You also asked the Secretary of State if he would list the damage identified by the survey of scheduled ancient monuments from natural forces, vegetation and animals and what monies he had allocated this financial year to tackle the damage identified.
Analyses of the results of the first round of warden visits are presently being prepared for Highland South and Tayside and Borders Regions for the use of my staff in their conservation work. The publication of summary articles in the professional archaeological press, containing the statistical information you mention, is being considered.
Funds are not specifically allocated for tackling damage to monuments identified by our wardens as being at risk. However monies are available for this sort of work and in financial year 1993–94 these are £14,000 for management agreements under section 17 of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 and £189,000 for grant aid for the repair of monuments under section 24 of the 1979 Act.
Information Directorate
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many people are employed in the information directorate of his Department; what was the total cost of the directorate in 1992–93; and if he will give the comparable information for 1978–79.
The number of staff employed in the Scottish Office information directorate on 30 September 1993 totalled 51.5. The running cost of the directorate in 1992–93 was £1.9 million. Owing to the introduction of new Scottish Office budgetary arrangements in 1986–86, a directly comparable figure for running costs is not available for 1978–79; and no record has been retained of the total number of people then employed.
Moats
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) what action his Department is currently taking to record and preserve moated sites of archaeological interest; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he will list
(a) the surveys and (b) the excavations that are currently being carried out of moated sites of archaeological interest.
[holding answer 27 October 1993]: The subject of the question relates to matters undertaken by Historic Scotland. I have asked its chief executive, Mr. Graeme Munro, to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from G. N. Munro to Mr. Martin Redmond, dated 28 October 1993:
Sir Hector Monro MP, the Minister for Agriculture and Environment at The Scottish Office has asked me to reply to your two recent Parliamentary Questions about moated sites of archaeological interest.
Firstly, you asked what action was being taken to record and preserve such sites. The recording of sites of archaeological interest in Scotland is the responsibility of the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland (RCAHMS), and their preservation through scheduling and management, is the responsibility of Historic Scotland.
Moated sites (which are most frequent in south-west Scotland) are dealt with in exactly the same fashion as all other sites of archaeological interest. They are recorded by written description and by photographic and drawn illustrations and these records are made available either by printed publication or through the National Monuments Record of Scotland, which the Royal Commission maintains. There is no scheduling campaign directed specifically towards moated sites, but their merits are considered along with all other sites when geographical areas are being considered in the agency's rolling scheduling programme.
Secondly, you asked if the Secretary of State would list the surveys and excavations currently being carried out on moated sites of archaeological interest. The RCAHMS is responsible for carrying out such surveys. They inform me that 8 such sites were surveyed in Scotland in the last year-6 in Annandale and 2 in south east Perthshire. I understand the Royal Commission plan to survey 3 sites next year. There are no excavations currently being carried out on such sites.
If you have concerns about specific moated sites in Scotland I would be pleased to hear and to consider them.
Northern Ireland
Ec Students
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what are the costs of education in Northern Ireland for EC students met by (a) his Department and (b) each education and library board; and what are the numbers of such students from each EC country and in each level of institute of education.
The following table shows the numbers and estimated costs of fees—only awards held by EC students at Northern Ireland institutions during the 1992–93 academic year.
| Number of students | £000 | |
| Department of Education | 24 | 53 |
| Education and Library Boards | ||
| North-Eastern | 1,330 | 3,126 |
| Belfast | 495 | 1,163 |
| Western | 101 | 237 |
| Southern | 3 | 7 |
| South-Eastern | — | — |
Information is not available on the numbers of students from each EC country. However, 1,852 of the students are ordinarily resident in the Republic of Ireland and the balance—101—come from elsewhere in the EC.
Residential Care Homes
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps will be taken to ensure that the levels of income support for those currently resident in homes should be set at levels which would ensure a choice of homes within income support limits; and if he will make a statement.
In setting the income support limits for people in residential care and nursing homes with preserved rights, the Government take account of information on movements in charging patterns in homes as well as on cost factors.
Dwellings And Tourist Development
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (1) how many planning applications were made for dwellings and tourist developments in the Lecale coast, Mourne and Strangford areas of outstanding natural beauty from 1 April 1983 to 31 March 1993; of these, how many were approved and how many were refused; and what were the general reasons for refusal;(2) how many planning applications were made for dwellings and tourist developments in the environmentally sensitive areas in the Mournes and Slieve Croob areas from 1 April 1983 to 31 March 1993; of these how many were approved and how many were refused; and what were the general reasons for refusal.
The information requested is not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Countryside (Access)
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what grant aid was made available to district councils in order to facilitate access to the countryside from 1 April 1983 to 31 March 1993; and if he will make a statement.
The information is as follows:
| Financial Year | Provision (£'000s) |
| 1983/84 | 10 |
| 1984/85 | 20 |
| 1985/86 | 80 |
| 1986/87 | 90 |
| 1987/88 | 249 |
| 1988/89 | 226 |
| 1989/90 | 275 |
| 1990/91 | 280 |
| 1991/92 | 288 |
| 1992/93 | 295 |
Environmental Protection Agency
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps he will take to establish an environmental protection agency; and if he will make a statement.
In Northern Ireland, most of the intended functions of the proposed agency in England and Wales already lie within central Government, namely in the Environment Service of the Department of the Environment. When final details of the agency are available, I will decide whether or not any proposals for change in Northern Ireland should be made.
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what is the current assessment of the number of people in Northern Ireland suffering from myalgic encephalomyelitis.
The information requested is not available centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Local Anthority Debt
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what is the current extent of local authority debt in each of the 26 district councils in Northern Ireland.
The total debt outstanding from loans and advances from the Government Loans Fund by district council area at 31 March 1992 is set out as follow:
| £ | |
| Antrim Borough Council | 2,904,499 |
| Ards Borough Council | 3,273,355 |
| Armagh District Council | 2,635,445 |
| Ballymena Borough Council | 860,584 |
| Ballymoney Borough Council | 1,655,184 |
| Banbridge District Council | 2,745,515 |
| Belfast City Council | 12,289,642 |
| Carrickfergus Borough Council | 32,370 |
| Castlereagh Borough Council | 5,821,792 |
| Coleraine Borough Council | 2,388,273 |
| Cookstown District Council | 306,375 |
| Craigavon Borough Council | 1,456,472 |
| Deny City Council | 6,992,348 |
| Down District Council | 5,146,690 |
| Dungannon District Council | 1,326,877 |
| Fermanagh District Council | 888,196 |
| Lame Borough Council | 1,740,599 |
| Limavady Borough Council | 1,542,266 |
| Lisburn Borough Council | 1,970,384 |
| Magherafelt District Council | 1,114,525 |
| Moyle District Council | 1,773,441 |
| Newry and Mourne District Council | 8,917,629 |
| Newtownabbey District Council | 7,115,280 |
| North Down Borough Council | 10,471,472 |
| Omagh District Council | 3,968,856 |
| Strabane District Council | 3,807,291 |
| Total | 93,145,360 |
Residential Care Homes
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps will be taken to ensure that the value of the former homes of a person in residential care is disregarded by the health and social services boards where a former carer remains in the property.
A health and social services board, in assessing a resident's ability to pay for residential or nursing home care, can disregard the value of his or her former home if it is also the sole residence of someone who has been caring for the resident. Where a board has decided to disregard the value of the property because a former long-term carer is living there it may review that decision when that person moves out or dies.
Bogland
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will make it his policy to preserve the Curran bog and other areas of bogland left in the Province.
The Government's policy on the conservation of peatland in Northern Ireland is set out in the document "Conserving Peatland in Northern Ireland —a Statement of Policy" issued on 23 June 1993. This states, at paragraph 2.5:—
In this context, the Department of the Environment is reassessing the scientific interest of a number of lowland bogs that were not in the first round of declarations. Curran bog will be re-evaluated as part of that exercise, and I will write to the hon. Gentleman once that process is complete."It is the Department's intention to declare all remaining areas of intact lowland raised bog as Areas of Special Scientific Interest where they meet the minimum scientific criteria".
Recycling
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps will be taken to ensure that district councils are allocated sufficient funding to undertake recycling programmes in accordance with Government's guidelines and directives; and if he will make a statement.
The Government published a consultation paper in March 1993 entitled, "Future Strategy for Waste Management in Northern Ireland". The paper included new legislative proposals similar to the waste management provisions in the Environmental Protection Act 1990. Under these provisions, district councils will be required to draw up recycling plans for their districts. Should councils wish to undertake capital spending on recycling schemes, the Government will be prepared to consider sympathetically applications for loan sanction for this purpose. The legislation will include provision to allow for savings made by district councils as a result of recycling to be made payable to those promoting recycling, such as voluntary groups.
Litter
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps will be taken to ensure that district councils are allocated sufficient funding in order to undertake new duties and responsibilities as a consequence of the proposed Litter Order.
I am aware that district councils have been seeking additional finance to help them implement the requirements of the proposed litter legislation. This matter is under consideration in the light of the responses to the consultation on the publication of the proposal for a Draft Litter (Northern Ireland) Order. I shall make an announcement in the near future on the results of that consultation process.
Disability Benefits
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many people have made applications in respect of (a) disability living allowance and (b) invalidity benefit from 1 April 1988 to 31 March 1993; of these how many were successful; and what financial amounts were made payable.
Responsibility for the subject in question has been delegated to the Social Security Agency under its chief executive, Mr. Alec Wylie. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from A. Wylie to Mr. Eddie McGrady, dated 27 October 1993:
As Chief Executive of the Social Security Agency I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question on the number of applications received in respect of Disability Living Allowance and Invalidity Benefit from 1 April 1988 to 31 March 1993.
During the period 3 February 1992 to 31 March 1993, 31,981 claims to Disability Living Allowance were received, of these 21,627 were successful. In addition 7,958 claims were received from existing Attendance Allowance/Mobility Allowance beneficiaries and of these 6,923 were also successful. The actual expenditure for 1992–93 is not yet available but the estimated expenditure is £57 million.
Information on the number of applications received in respect of Invalidity Benefit during the period 1 April 1988 to 31 March 1993 and the number who were successful is not available in the form requested. However the number of persons receiving the benefit at April each year from 1988 to 1993 and the yearly benefit expenditure are as follows:
Year
| Number of persons Receiving invalidity benefit
| Benefit expenditure
|
£ million
| ||
| 1988 | 45,318 | 130·1 |
| 1989 | 47,735 | 141·2 |
| 1990 | 50,890 | 157·3 |
| 1991 | 54,122 | 182·0 |
| 1992 | 58,197 | 215·0 |
| 1993 | 62,823 | 1238·4 |
1 Estimated. | ||
I hope you will find this reply helpful. Further information on social security claims and expenditure is published in "Expenditure, Plans and Priorities (Northern Ireland)". A copy of this reply will appear in the Official Report and copies will be placed in the Library.
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps are taken to ensure that adequate resources are allocated to the disability section of the Department of Health and Social Services in order that staff can deliver a full and effective service.
Responsibility for the subject in question has been delegated to the Social Security Agency under its chief executive Mr. Alec Wylie. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from A. Wylie to Mr. Eddie McCrady, dated 27 October 1993:
As Chief Executive of the Social Security Agency I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about resources for Disability Living Allowance Branch.
Since Disability Living Allowance was introduced in April 1992, we have been keeping the resource position under close review. Overall the staffing level has risen by around 100 posts in the past 18 months with the complement now standing at 241 posts.
The target of clearing 65% of claims within 30 days has been met from June 1993 and I am satisfied that the Branch is adequately resourced to handle the current intake of claims. I would however assure you that workloads and staffing levels will continue to be closely monitored to ensure that claims from our customers are processed as quickly as possible.
I hope this helps explain the position for you. A copy of this reply will appear in the Offical Report and copies will be placed in the Library.
Social Fund
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many people have made applications to the social fund at each of the social security offices in South Down from 1 April 1988 to 31 March 1993; of these how many were successful; and what financial amounts were made payable.
Responsibility for the subject in question has been delegated to the Social Security Agency under its chief executive, Mr. Alec Wylie. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from A. Wylie to Mr. Eddie McGrady, dated 27 October 1993:
As Chief Executive of the Social Security Agency I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question on the number of people who made applications to the Social Fund at each of the social security offices in South Down from 1 April 1988 to 31 March 1993, the numbers who were successful and the amounts involved.
The information is not held precisely in the form requested but I have set out the available data in the attached table.
As an individual can make more than one application to the Social Fund the figures shown refer to the total number of applications received. As regards details for each Social Security Office in South Down, these can only be supplied for the period 1 April 1988 to 31 March 1991. From April 1991 the Social Fund has been managed on a District basis and I am therefore providing information from that date in respect of Mourne District, comprising Newry, Banbridge, Newcastle and Kilkeel and for Belfast South and Down District which covers Knockbreda, Shaftesbury Square, Downpatrick and Ballynahinch.
You may be interested to know that information about the number of applications processed, the number of awards and the amount paid, is available in the Library under Social Fund Data. The figures are updated on a monthly basis.
I hope you will find this information helpful. A copy of this reply will appear in the Official Report and copies will be placed in the Library.
Residential Care Homes
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps he will take to ensure that all residents in nursing and residential homes receive their personal allowance of £12.65 per week.
The registration and inspection units monitor the extent to which residential and nursing homes help residents to control their own finances, including personal allowances, as part of their inspection process. They also monitor the arrangements in place for handling the finances of those residents who cannot look after their own affairs. The units have the power to cancel the registration of residential and nursing homes where standards are considered to be below an acceptable level.
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps will be taken to increase income support levels for those in receipt of care in residential and nursing homes; and if he will make a statement.
Each year the Government make an assessment of the position and look carefully at the levels of the income support limits as part of the general benefit uprating exercise. This will continue to be the case.
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what reports have been received in respect of residential and nursing homes by the registration and inspection units set up under the Residential Homes Order 1992; and if he will make a statement.
The Eastern, Northern and Western boards registration and inspection units have each produced two annual reports which detail the work undertaken since their establishment. The Southern board's registration and inspection unit is about to produce its first annual report. The reports are presented to health and social services boards and are available to members of the public on request.
Local Government Reorganisation
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland when he has last met representatives of the Association of Local Authorities in Northern Ireland to discuss local government reorganisation.
I have never met representatives of the Association of Local Authorities of Northern Ireland to discuss local government reorganisation, nor have I had any request to do so.
Job Vacancies
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what is the number of new vacancies notified to jobcentres in Strabane, Omagh, Cookstown and Magherafelt during the past three years, together with the number of job losses during the same period in each area.
The information on new vacancies notified to local offices of the Training and Employment Agency and jobs lost in each area during the three-year period up to 8 October 1993 is as follows:
| Vacancies notified | Jobs lost | |
| Cookstown | 1,849 | 90 |
| Magherafelt | 2,496 | 600 |
| Omagh | 3,129 | 30 |
| Strabane | 1,941 | 237 |
Government Employees
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many Government employees, including home civil servants, there are in Northern Ireland.
On 1 April 1993, there were 33,009 whole-time equivalent staff employed in the Departments for which my right hon. and learned Friend has responsibility.In counting whole-time equivalent staff, part-time employees are counted as halves.
Sight Tests
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many national health service sight tests took place in each financial year since 1984–85.
The numbers of health service sight tests for which payments was made in Northern Ireland in the financial years 1984–85 to 1992–93 were:
| Financial year | Total health service sight tests (Thousands) |
| 1984–85 | 207·1 |
| 1985–86 | 221·0 |
| 1986–87 | 231·1 |
| 1987–88 | 254·9 |
| 1988–89 | 284·9 |
| 1989–90 | 143·8 |
| 1990–91 | 119·5 |
| 1991–92 | 142·3 |
| 1992–93 | 159·9 |
Lord Chancellor's Department
Crown Court
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department how many cases were tried in the Crown court in the last available three months; and what were the figures for the equivalent period (a) one year ago and (b) two years ago.
During the three months July to September 1993, 5,148 cases were disposed of by trial in the Crown court. The corresponding figures for the same period in 1992 and 1991 were 6,719 and 7,271 respectively.
Public Trust Office
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what plans his Department has to establish the Public Trust Office as a next steps agency.
I am pleased to announce that it is the Lord Chancellor's intention to establish the Public Trust Office as an executive agency in the second half of 1994. As part of the process of establishing the office as an agency, the Lord Chancellor will be examining the services the office provides, defining them clearly and asking the public trustee to draw up a statement of charter standards, setting out the levels of service the office aims to achieve.Although the agency will initially comprise all the present functions of the office, the Lord Chancellor has asked for further work to be carried out to examine the continuing need for a trustee service provided by the public sector and whether the functions undertaken by the Court Funds Office are necessary.
Snaresbrook Crown Court
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department on how many occasions in 1993 scheduled individual sittings of separate courts within the Snaresbrook Crown court complex have been unable to sit due to the absence of a judge or recorder; what was the specific reason for each such cancellation; what was the date of the maximum number of cancellations occurring on a single day; and what was the estimated cost to public funds on that day, and the total for the year so far.
[holding answer 18 October 1993]: The information requested is not readily available in the form requested and could be obtained in that form only at disproportionate cost. However, I am in a position to provide the following information on planned and actual sittings for the Crown court at Snaresbrook in the period 22 March 1993 to 11 October 1993.
| Judge days | ||
| Week commencing | Planned | Sat |
| 22 March 1993 | 94 | 96 |
| 29 March 1993 | 96 | 95 |
| 5 April 1993 | 44 | 41 |
| 14 April 1993 | 30 | 30 |
| 19 April 1993 | 93 | 91 |
| 26 April 1993 | 96 | 96 |
| 4 May 1993 | 81 | 74 |
| 10 May 1993 | 95 | 94 |
| 17 May 1993 | 96 | 98 |
| 24 May 1993 | 95 | 95 |
| 2 June 1993 | 59 | 52 |
| 7 June 1993 | 99 | 98 |
| 14 June 1993 | 98·5 | 97 |
| 21 June 1993 | 90·5 | 94 |
| 28 June 1993 | 91 | 91 |
| 5 July 1993 | 94 | 86 |
| 12 July 1993 | 95 | 95 |
| 19 July 1993 | 100 | 99 |
| 26 July 1993 | 87 | 87 |
| 2 August 1993 | 60 | 61 |
| 9 August 1993 | 59 | 56 |
| 16 August 1993 | 55 | 56 |
| 23 August 1993 | 54 | 54 |
| 31 August 1993 | 42 | 35 |
| 6 September 1993 | 65 | 62 |
| 13 September 1993 | 69·5 | 70 |
| 20 September 1993 | 63 | 63 |
| 27 September 1993 | 58·5 | 59 |
| 4 October 1993 | 55 | 55 |
| 11 October 1993 | 78 | 79 |
Planned sittings are cancelled for a variety of reasons including:—
Actual sittings may exceed planned sittings if recorders or assistant recorders unexpectedly become available to sit.