Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 237: debated on Friday 11 February 1994

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Friday 11 February 1994

Overseas Development

Non-Governmental Organisations

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what was the annual official development assistance by calendar year, through the joint funding scheme for NGOs, from its inception to the latest year for which data are available.

Annual official development assistance through the joint funding scheme is collated by financial year. The following table illustrates funding provided to NGOs, from the first full year of its operation:

Financial yearTotals (£)
1976–77291,407
1977–78622,234
1978–791,331,566
1979–801,556,267
1980–811,411,936
1981–822,543,199
1982–832,359,744
1983–842,381,731
1984–853,794,882
1985–864,882,584
1986–875,812,641
1987–887,954,000
1988–8911,686,000
1989–9016,631,000
1990–9120,061,000
1991–9223,159,000
1992–9328,000,000
11993–9429,000,000
1 (Estimated).

Colombia

To ask the Secretray of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps he will take to ensure that the aid programme to Colombia meets the declared objectives of British aid and, in particular, to ensure that the aid programme addresses the specific needs of the poorest people in Colombia.

The aid programme for Colombia comprises entirely technical co-operation. We will continue to support activities aimed at aid programme priorities, including good government, renewable natural resource mangement and human resource development. The Columbia programme will therefore include projects with an indirect impact on poverty, as well as those with a more direct role, particularly those undertaken through non-governmental organisations within the joint funding scheme.

Sudan

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent restrictions have been placed on the supply of humanitarian aid to and movement of humanitarian aid by international aid agencies within the Sudan.

In recent months, both the Government of Sudan and the Sudan People's Liberation Army have restricted access by aid agencies to some areas of need. International non-governmental organisations and the UN have difficulty securing permission to travel which prevents needs assessments and monitoring missions from taking place. In addition, the Government of Sudan have failed to meet their pledged food aid contribution for 1993. We continue to press all parties to lift restrictions on the international aid effort.

Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs

Colombia

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will raise the question of the people called disposables in Colombia with the Government of Colombia at the earliest opportunity.

When I met the Colombia Foreign Trade Minister on 3 February, I made clear the concerns felt in Britain over this question and urged the Colombian Government to take effective measures to tackle the problem.

Yugoslavia

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will place in the Library copies of communications submitted to the United Nations Security Council sanctions committee 724 on United Kingdom compliance with the United Nations embargo on arms and military equipment sales to the former Yugoslavia.

The United Kingdom has not been required to submit details of compliance to the United Nations sanctions committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council resolution 724.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what information he has received from the United Nations regarding the countries of design and manufacture of shells, mortars and bullets used against citizens of cities in Bosnia designated as having special protected status by the United Nations.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment has been made by Her Majesty's Government since the establishment of the European Community's embargo on arms and military equipment exports to the former Yugoslavia, of 5 July 1991, of the effectiveness of the embargo in regard to United Kingdom exports.

No assessment has been made.We believe the embargo is being applied effectively in regard to exports from the United Kingdom. The Department of Trade and Industry applies a rigorous export licence policy. Her Majesty's Customs and Excise, which are responsible for the control of exports, make a careful check on all exports destined for the former Republic of Yugoslavia.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the implementation of United Nations Security Council resolution 724 of 15 December 1991 on the establishment of a sanctions committee to monitor the export embargo on military sales to the former Yugoslavia.

Following the passage of United Nations Security Council resolution 724 on 15 December 1991 a sanctions committee was established to advise on all aspects of the arms embargo against the former Republic of Yugoslavia. This committee has been empowered by subsequent resolutions to act as point of reference for all matters relating to sanctions against the former Republic of Yugoslavia. The committee meets on a weekly basis.

Eu Committee Of The Regions

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what measures he proposes to ensure close contact and liaison with the European Union Committee of the Regions.

I met United Kingdom members and alternate members of the Committee on 8 December last year. We discussed the role of the EC Committee of the Regions and contacts between United Kingdom members and the Government. Our permanent representation in Brussels has already been in contact with United Kingdom members and will provide a regular contact point for them, as well as following the work of the Committee as a whole. The Cabinet Office will co-ordinate contacts between Committee members and home Departments and supervise any briefing requirements.

Nuclear Weapons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the present United Kingdom nuclear explosive capability in its nuclear weapons inventory; and what it was in 1970.

I have been asked to reply.1970 was a period of transition for the United Kingdom's nuclear weapons inventory, with one generation of weapons being withdrawn and a new generation introduced. We are now in another period of transition, as around half our nuclear free-fall bombs have been withdrawn from the operational inventory and the first Trident submarine will soon enter operational service. It has been the long-standing practice of successive Governments not to give details of operational warheads or yields, but in broad terms, the total explosive power of the United Kingdom's operational nuclear inventory is currently about half of what it was in 1970.

Duchy Of Lancaster

Public Bodies

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster who are the members currently appointed to the political honours scrutiny committee.

The present members of the political honours scrutiny committee are:

  • The Lord Pym MC DL (Chairman)
  • The Lord Cledwyn of Penrhos CH
  • The Lord Thomson of Monifieth KT DL

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster who are the members currently appointed to the Advisory Council on Science and Technology.

Last year's White Paper on science, engineering and technology announced that a new Council for Science and Technology would replace the Advisory Council on Science and Technology. The members of the Council for Science and Technology are:

  • Professor William Stewart FRS FRSE
  • Professor Sushantha Bhattacharyya FEng
  • Professor Sir Aaron Klug FRS
  • Sir Robin Nicholson FRS FEng
  • Dr. Bridget Ogilvie FBiol
  • Sir Ralph Robins FEng FRAes
  • Dr. Alan Rudge FRS FEng
  • Professor Stewart Sutherland FBA
  • Sir Richard Sykes
  • Mr. John Towers
  • Dr. Peter Williams CBE

Public Appointments

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how often a review is undertaken of the names on the public appointments unit central list; and how many of these names have been on the list for (a) more than five years, (b) two to five years and (c) under two years.

The public appointments unit has completed a first review of the names on the central list, and in future aims to ensure that the information held about individuals is reviewed and updated every two years. Information about the length of time that names have been held on the list is not recorded.

Daresbury And Rutherford Appleton Laboratories

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how the Daresbury and Rutherford Appleton laboratories will be affected as a result of the planned changes to the research councils.

I am currently examining the future structure and organisation of the Rutherford Appleton and Daresbury laboratories, which are at present part of the Science and Engineering Research Council. From 1 April 1994, as an interim step consequent on the splitting of SERC into the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council, the two laboratories will be run as a combined operation under the auspices of the new EPSRC. In the longer term I am looking to put the two laboratories on a more indepedent footing to enable them better to serve their customers and users from the research councils, universities and industry. Given the high regard in which the Rutherford Appleton and Daresbury laboratories are held, both nationally and internationally, it is important that we consider carefully what changes should be made to their status as a result of the reorganisation of the research council system.The Government have developed a standard set of tests on how Government-funded work can best be organised, known as "prior options". In the 1993 next steps review—Cm 2430—we announced new procedures to encourage those in outside organisations with innovative ideas about how such functions can best be discharged to put them forward. These procedures for "prior options" review and outside involvement apply, where appropriate, to executive non-departmental public bodies, such as the Daresbury and Rutherford Appleton laboratories.The "prior options" tests consider whether the functions provided by the organisation continue to be needed, in whole or in part; whether responsibility for the activity needs to remain in the public sector; and whether some or all of the functions provided should be contracted out or market tested. The consultants KPMG have conducted a preliminary study of these issues. In common with the recent National Audit Office report, they found much to admire at the laboratories. They have advised that there is a need for the services which the laboratories provide, and that privatisation would not represent a sensible option. In considering this advice, I wish to take account of the widest possible range of views. I am therefore inviting organisations and individuals who may have ideas or proposals as to how the Daresbury and Rutherford Appleton laboratories should be organised in future to submit them to the Director General of the Research Councils in my Department.The results of this review will be taken into account in the wider scrutiny of public sector research establishments which I announced to the House on 2 February,

Official Report, columns 896–97.

Employment

Public Bodies

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment who are the members currently appointed to each of the industrial tribunals.

A list of the lay members of the industrial tribunals was placed in the Library in January.

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment who are the members currently appointed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal consists of both judicial and lay members. The president is the Honourable Mr. Justice Mummery, a High Court judge. A judge of the Court of Session—the Honourable Lord Coulsfield—sits at the EAT in Scotland and there are also visiting judges in England and Wales. The judges are nominated in England and Wales by the Lord Chancellor from among the judges of the High Court and the Court of Appeal and in Scotland by the Lord President of the Court of Session from among the judges of that court. The lay members are appointed by Her Majesty the Queen on the joint recommendation of the Secretary of State for Employment and the Lord Chancellor. A list of the lay members has been placed in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment who are the members currently appointed to the board of the Commissioner for the Rights of Trade Union Members.

Statutory Minimum Wage

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment, pursuant to his answer of 18 January, Official Report, column 548, what is the sectoral breakdown of his estimate of jobs lost as a result of a statutory minimum wage.

There is no sectoral breakdown of that estimate. In order to calculate such a figure, reliable information is needed about the relationship between pay and employment. Information on this relationship is available for the whole economy, but not for individual industries.

Special Employment Measures

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list each of the main United Kingdom special employment measures since 1970; if he will give the date when the scheme came into operation and its date of closure if it is still not running, and the annual and cumulative amount of public expenditure spent on each scheme; and if he will detail the annual and total number of claimants helped under each scheme.

The information requested is not kept centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Unemployment Benefit

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment what has been the cost of administering unemployment benefit in the London travel-to-work area in each of the past five years.

Responsibility for the subject of the question has been delegated to the Employment Service agency under its chief executive. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter from M. E. G. Fogden to Mrs. Bridget Prentice, dated 11 February 1994:

The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your question concerning the cost of administering unemployment benefit in the London travel to work area in each of the past five years.
It may be helpful if I explain that the Employment Service (ES) has responsibility for delivering a number of benefits in addition to unemployment benefit, as well as a range of other services to people seeking employment and training opportunities. Therefore, the figures t have provided relate to the costs of delivering the full range of our services in London.
It has not been possible to provide the information you seek for the full five year period. For audit purposes, the ES retains financial records of running costs for the proceeding three financial years. Additionally, the organisation of the ES Region responsible for London, the London and South East Region, has undergone considerable re-organisation during this period. I am therefore only able to provide comparable figures for the financial years 1991–92, 1992–93 and 1993–94 (projected figures). These figures relate to the ten ES areas which cover London. There are currently 15 ES areas within the London and South East Region; nine of which serve London and the remainder the Shires surrounding it. These figures exclude fixed premises costs, ie the costs of leasing and purchasing premises and the associated running costs, as the method of collecting this information has changed considerably over the last three years.
Given these provisions, the relevant costs, which include staff salary and other running costs such as fuel and telecommunications, are as follows:

£

1991–9289,467,057
1992–93105,609,559
1993–94

1128,646,766

1Projected.

I must emphasise that these figures are not strictly comparable. As you may be aware, since 1990 the ES has been pursuing a policy of bringing together Unemployment Benefit Offices and Jobcentres with the aim of providing a more efficient and effective service to our clients. Individual ES staff are responsible for all aspects of ES work and it is not possible to provide accurate or meaningful breakdowns of the costs of specific activities.
I hope this is helpful.

Trade Unions

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment which trade unions have made representations to him in the last 10 years on whether campaigning on issues including pensions, health and safety, and job conditions has to be paid for out of a political fund.

I am unaware of any such representations. A trade union does not need a political fund unless it wishes to spend money on electoral or other party political activities.

Deregulation

To ask the Secretary of State for Employment how many employers have been prosecuted, since April 1986, under each of the regulations identified as candidates for revocation in his press notice 154/93 of 20 July 1993.

[holding answer 9 February 1994]: The number of employers prosecuted by the Health and Safety Executive's field operations division's inspectors, since April 1986, under each of the regulations identified as candidates for revocation in the Employment Department press notice of 20 July are set out in the following tables. The aim of any repeals or revocations will be to increase the effectiveness of the regulatory regime, which will include continuing to prosecute employers who fall below acceptable standards of health and safety.

RegulationsNumber of employers prosecuted
The Flax and Tow Spinning and Weaving Regulations 19061None
The Hemp Spinning and Weaving Regulations 19071None
The Cotton Cloth Factories Regulations 19291None
The Cotton Cloth (Record of Humidity) Regulation 1964None
The Homework Order 1911None
The Homework Order 1912None
The Homework Order 1913None
The Homework (Lampshades) Order 1929None
The Homework Orders Variation Order 1938None
The Agriculture (Poisonous Substances) Act 1952None

Regulations

Number of employers prosecuted

The Agriculture (Ladders) Regulations 19575
The Agriculture (Poisonous Substances) (Extension) Order 1965None
The Agriculture (Poisonous Substance) (Extension) Order 1966None
The Agriculture (Poisonous Substances) Act 1952 (Repeals and Modifications) Regulations 1975None
The Breathing Apparatus etc. (Report on Examination) Order 1961None
The Shipbuilding (Reports on Breathing Apparatus) Order 1961None
The Dangerous Machines (Training of Young Persons) Order 1961None
The Prescribed Dangerous Machines Order 1964None
The Agriculture (Circular Saws) Regulations 1959

232

The Abrasive Wheels Regulations 1970

2311

The Factories Act 1961:
Section 21

328

Section 30

441

Section 681
Section 133None
The Shipbuilding and Ship-repairing Regulations 1960:
Regulations 48–52

41

Regulations 60–65None
The Offices, Shops and Railway Premises Act 1963:
Section 19

3None

The Construction (General Provisions) Regulations
1961: regulation 21

4None

The Docks Regulations 1988: regulation 18

4None

Notes:

1 These regulations were largely revoked by the Workplaces (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992. The latter apply to new workplaces immediately and to existing workplaces from 1 January 1996.

2 These regulations were largely revoked by the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1992. The revocations are effective for new equipment immediately and for existing work equipment from 1 January 1997. It is not possible to identify how many prosecutions have been taken under the parts of the Regulations that are revoked by the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations.

3 The remaining provisions relate the training of operators. Proposals for their consolidation into one set of training requirements under more modern legislation are currently being considered by the Health and Safety Commission.

4 These provisions cover entry into confined spaces. Proposals for their consolidation into one set of requirements for confined spaces under more modern legislation are currently being considered by the Health and Safety Commission.

National Finance

Top Salaries Review Body

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer who are the members currently appointed to the Top Salaries Review Body.

As announced in the Official Report, 26 July 1993, column 559, the Top Salaries Review Body was renamed the Senior Salaries Review Body last year. Its current members are:

  • Sir David Nickson KBE DL (Chairman)
  • Professor George Bain
  • Mrs. Louise Botting CBE
  • Ms Ann Burdus
  • Sir Peter Cazalet
  • Sir Cecil Clothier KCB QC
  • Mr. Gordon Hourston
  • Mr. Hugh Pigott
  • Sir Anthony Wilson
Members are appointed by, and the review body reports to, the Prime Minister.

Social Security

Public Bodies

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) who are the members currently appointed to each of the child support appeal tribunals;(2) who are the members currently appointed to each of the medical appeal tribunals;(3) who are the members currently appointed to each of the disability appeal tribunals;(4) who are the members currently appointed to each of the social security appeal tribunals;(5) who are the members currently appointed to each of the vaccine damage tribunals.

I have been asked to reply.The appointment of members of all the appeal tribunals is the responsibility of the President of the Independent Tribunal Service, His Honour Judge Thorpe. The hon. Member may wish to write to him direct.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security who are the members currently appointed to the Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee.

I have been asked to reply. The members currently appointed to the Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee are:

Chairman

  • Bob Taylor Esq. OBE
  • Director
  • Birmingham International Airport

Members

  • Mrs. Jill Allen-King MBE
  • National Federation of the Blind
  • Mrs. Jean Ashcroft MBE
  • Arthritis Care
  • Peter Barker Esq.
  • Royal National Institute for the Blind
  • Tony Briggs Esq.
  • Association of Transport Co-ordinating Officers
  • Bill Buchanan Esq. LVO
  • British Rail Advisory Group
  • Lewis Carter-Jones Esq.
  • Cliff Dallinger Esq.
  • Passenger Transport Executive
  • Mrs. Claudia Flanders OBE JP
  • Stanley Flett Esq.
  • Royal National Institute for the Blind—Scotland
  • Richard Gregory Esq.
  • Margaret Blackwood
  • Housing Association Ltd.
  • Edinburgh
  • Sir John Hannam Esq. MP
  • All-party Disablement Group
  • Joe Hennessy Esq. OBE
  • Muscular Dystrophy Group of GB
  • Mr. T. Kennan Esq.
  • Northumbria Motor Services Ltd.
  • Miss Valerie Lang MBE
  • The Spastics Society
  • Sir Peter Large Esq. CBE
  • Joint Council on Mobility for Disabled People
  • Bert Massie OBE
  • Royal Association for Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Brian McGinnis Esq.
  • MENCAP
  • Mrs. Dorothy Rhodes
  • Age Concern
  • Mrs. Jean Williams
  • Welsh Council on Disability
  • Mrs. Jane Wilmot
  • Royal National Institute for Deaf People

Industrial Diseases

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will list the industrial diseases which are under review by the Industrial Injuries Advisory Council or its research working group.

The council is currently investigating hand/arm vibration syndrome, process injuries, disorders of the knee, osteoarthritis of the hip and occupational rhinitis and keeps scientific evidence on all other industrial diseases under review on an ongoing basis.

Benefits Tourism

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is his Department's estimate of the current scale and volume of benefits tourism.

Information is not held centrally on the number of foreign nationals who are in receipt of benefits without having contributed either taxes or national insurance contributions.

War Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will list the hospitals where medical examinations are carried out for the purpose of assessing entitlement to war pension.

The majority of examinations are carried out by medical boards or medical specialists at local medical boarding centres or consulting rooms. In such instances hospital referral is not necessary.Where examinations are to be carried out at hospitals all attempts are made to have this done at a hospital convenient for the claimant.

Child Support Agency

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many assessments have been made by the Child Support Agency up to 2 February.

Figures for the latest period available, to the end of December, are already in the Library and information relating to January will be placed in the Library in due course.

Personal Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) what proportion of the money contributed to an average personal pension at the rebate-only level by a man of 30 years would be absorbed in expenses, charges and commission during the lifetime of the contract if it were terminated after five years;(2) what proportion of the money contributed to an average personal pension at the rebate-only level by a man aged 30 years would be absorbed in expenses, charges and commission during the lifetime of the contract up to maturity;(3) what proportion of the money contributed to an average personal pension at the rebate-only level by a man aged 30 years would be absorbed in expenses, charges and commission in the first year of contract.

I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given to my hon. Friend the Member for Langbaurgh (Mr. Bates) on 30 November 1993 at columns 432–33.

Elderly Population

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what change is projected in the population of those aged (a) over 65 years, (b) over 75 years and (c) over 85 years in each of the next 10 years.

The information is in the table.

YearNumber of people aged 65 and over (000s)Number of people aged 75 and over (000s)Number of people aged 85 and over (000s)
19938,9613,917963
19948,9924,0921,202
19959,0304,0281,038
19969,0694,1341,071
19979,0954,2151,101
19989,1054,2711,134
19999,1154,3201,168
20009,1394,3621,196
20019,1724,4071,211
20029,2124,4421,211
20039,2634,4711,194

Source: OPCS and Government Actuary's Department: based on mid-1992 Great Britain population projections.

Disability Benefits

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many children there were in families in Wales receiving invalidity benefit or its equivalent in 1979 and at the latest available date.

Information for 1979 is unavailable. The latest date for which information is available is 4 April 1992, but not in the form requested. Such information as is available is the following:Number of child dependency increases in payment to invalidity benefit recipients in Wales—24,000

Source: I per cent. sample of claimants in Great Britain, rounded to the nearest thousand.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what arrangements he intends to make for an equivalent premium after 28 weeks for those recipients on income support, housing benefit and council tax benefit who are incapable of work following the introduction of incapacity benefit in 1995 and the award of a higher rate of short-term benefit after 28 weeks.

The rules for the disability premium will be changing to be consistent with the incapacity benefit rules.

In particular, the new long-term incapacity benefit will act as a passport to the premium and for those who have no other means of entitlement to the disability premium, the period of incapacity needed to qualify will increase from 28 to 52 weeks. The new definition of work and assessment of incapacity will apply. We have no plans to introduce an additional premium payable after 28 weeks incapacity.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) what additional resources he plans to provide to fund the Benefits Agency medical service, to take account of the operational costs of incapacity benefit;(2) what additional resources he plans to provide to meet the costs of additional medical assessors and social security appeal tribunals following the introduction of incapacity benefit.

The estimated additional administrative costs and manpower consequences of the introduction of incapacity benefit appear in the financial memorandum accompanying the Social Security (Incapacity for Work) Bill. Further refinement of these figures will depend upon decisions still to be taken by Parliament. We are still considering the additional resources that may be required for the appeals system for incapacity benefit.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is his Department's budget for disability working allowance in 1993–94 and 1994–95 and the expected budget in 1995–96 and 1996–97.

Planned expenditure for disability working allowance was £16 million in 1993–94, and £50 million in 1994–95 and 1995–96, rounded to the nearest £50 million. Figures for 1996–97 will be available in the departmental report which is expected to be published in March.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how much has so far been paid in disability working allowance in 1993–94.

Disability working allowance outturn figures for 1993–94 will not become available until the departmental report is published in March.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what are the arrangements for claimants currently in receipt of severe disablement allowance whose incapacity for work is due for review after April 1995.

From April 1995 people in receipt of severe disablement allowance will no longer have to undergo any kind of review of their capacity for work.

Income Support (Giro Payment)

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many giro payments of income support are reported missing in each year; what percentage of total giro payment this is; and how many giros remain missing without being cashed.

The payment of income support by girocheque is a matter for Mr. Michael Bichard, the chief executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member with such information as is available.

Letter from Michael Bichard to Mr. John Fraser, dated 10 February 1994:

The Secretary of State for Social Security has asked me to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking about payments of Income Support made by girocheque.
Payments of Income Support are frequently combined with payments of other benefits therefore it is not possible to identify the number of payments made by girocheque that are for income support alone.
However, figures relating to the issue and losses of all girocheques issued by the Benefits Agency are available and are detailed below.

1988–89

1989–90

1990–91

1991–92

1992–93

Issues millions30·84434·48434·47036·19027·863
Losses84,90189,17683,84986,004135,546
Losses (Per cent.)0·2750·2590·2430·2830·490
No missing/ not cashed or traced6,1003,8559,29012,07836,641
The Employment Service acts as our agent in the provision of girocheques to those who are unemployed and claiming Income Support; the above figures relate only to girocheques issued by the Benefits Agency.

I hope that you find this reply helpful.

Incapacity Benefit

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what rules he proposes to apply for the award of disability premium for people on income support, housing benefit and council tax benefit, following the introduction of incapacity benefit in 1995.

The disability premium provides extra help in income support, housing benefit and council tax benefit for long-term sick and disabled people.For those claiming these benefits as long-term sick the rules for the disability premium will be changed from April 1995 to reflect the incapacity benefit changes announced by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State on 1 December 1993. The new long-term incapacity benefit will act as a passport to the disability premium. Severe disablement allowance will continue to bring entitlement to the disability premium. For those who have no other means of entitlement, the period of incapacity needed to qualify will increase from 28 to 52 weeks and the new definition of work and assessment of incapacity will apply.Disability living allowance, attendance allowance and mobility supplement are other passporting benefits to the disability premium, which can be awarded on other grounds—for instance, if the person is registered blind. These routes to the disability premium will not be affected by the incapacity benefit changes.

Attorney-General

International Military Services Ltd

To ask the Attorney-General what services he or his predecessors have performed under the Treasury Solicitor Act 1876 on behalf of International Military Services Ltd.

Treasury Solicitors' Department

To ask the Attorney-General if he will list the size, grades and costs of the staff of the Treasury Solicitors' Department in each of the last three years ending on 31 March and the current figures for numbers and grades.

The following table sets out the size and grades of the staff of the Treasury Solicitor's Department in each of the first three years ending on 31 March and the current figures:

199119921993
Grade31 March31 March31 MarchPresent
11111
21111
310988
4233
538403940
659645863
71788691101
SEO13131719
HEO33323236
EO68696772
AO/AA69747575
Support69747877
TOTAL439465470496
The costs of staff of the Treasury Solicitor's Department in each of the last three years ending on 31 March were:

  • 1990–91 £12559 million2
  • 1991–92 £14088 million
  • 1992–93 £15073 million

1 Includes legal officers and senior legal assistants.

2 1990–91 includes notional figure for superannuation of £1·642 million.

Superannuation was only charged in cash terms from I April 1991.

Wales

Bryn Melyn Home

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what public funding is provided for the Bryn Melyn home in Wales.

I am not aware of any public funding for this private children's home. No funding has been provided by the Department or other agencies for which the Welsh Office has direct responsibility.

School League Tables

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what representations on school league tables he has received from the Institute of Welsh Affairs; what reply he has sent; and if he will review current policies as a result.

None directly, but the report published by the institute in January, "Towards an educational policy for Wales", makes reference to the publication of school performance information.Before decisions are taken on the extent of school/college performance information to be published in autumn 1994 there will be consultations with schools, FE colleges, and education interests.

Open-Heart Surgery

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales if he will give the present waiting list for open-heart surgery in Wales.

Information on waiting lists is collected centrally on the basis of specialties recognised by the royal colleges. Open heart surgery is not one of these recognised specialties and hence the information requested is not available. However, at 30 September 1993, the latest date for which information is available, there were 301 people waiting for in-patient treatment in Wales in the specialty of cardiac surgery.

Cardiff Bupa Hospital

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what consultations he has had with the chairman of the South Glamorgan health authority concerning the provision of University Hospital of Wales staff at the Cardiff BUPA hospital to provide immediate postoperative care for NHS cardiac surgery patients operated on at the BUPA hospital at NHS expense; and if he will make a statement.

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what consultation he has had with the chairman of the South Glamorgan health authority concerning the training of BUPA nursing staff in post-operative cardiac surgery recovery techniques at the University Hospital of Wales; and what remuneration he has arranged for the South Glamorgan health authority for such training activities.

None. It would be for the Health Authority and the University Hospital of Wales to negotiate an appropriate charge for any services provided to private hospitals.

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales if he will give the present numbers who were treated at the BUPA hospital, Pentwyn, Cardiff, for open-heart surgery at the expense of the South Glamorgan health authority; and if he will make a statement.

In 1992–93, almost 1,000 adult open-heart operations were performed on NHS patients in South Wales, 50 of them under contract with the BUPA hospital in Cardiff. Commissioning authorities are fully funded to secure that level of service.Fifteen NHS open heart operations on patients from South Glamorgan were carried out at the BUPA hospital in Cardiff in 1992–93.

Training And Enterprise Councils

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what is the total number of chairpersons and board members of the training and enterprise councils in Wales.

There are seven chairpersons and 85 board members of the training and enterprise councils in Wales.

Trade And Industry

Public Bodies

To ask the President of the Board of Trade who are the members currently appointed to the London regional passengers' committee.

The members of the London regional passengers committee as at 21 January 1994 are:

  • Professor Eric C. Midwinter (Chairman)
  • Mr. David R. Bruck
  • Mrs. Delia M. Buckle
  • Mrs. Beverley J. Davies
  • Mr. Lekh C. Dindayal JP
  • Mr. Nicholas P. Ellis
  • Mrs. Stella A. Fowler
  • Sir Alan Greengross
  • Mr. Karl T. Gurney
  • Mr. Michael J. Harris
  • Mr. I. Haynes
  • Mr. Andrew J. Holt
  • Mr. Ernest C. King
  • Miss Faith C. Lawson
  • Mr. Stepehen J. A. J. Le Bras
  • Mr. Laurie Mack
  • Mrs. Suzanne C. May
  • Mr. Peter Nichols
  • Mr. Peter L. Noble
  • Mrs. Dawn Penso
  • Mr. John A. K. Phillips

To ask the President of the Board of Trade who are the members currently appointed to the Advisory Committee on Telecommunications for Small Businesses.

Appointments to the Advisory Committee on Telecommunications for Small Businesses are the responsibility of the Director General of Telecommunications. However, I understand that the current members are:Chairman:Mr. Michael AshtonMembers:

  • Miss Joy Allan
  • Mrs. Judith Barden
  • Mr. Sefton Bennett
  • Mr. Robert Frenzel
  • Mr. Patrick Frymann
  • Mr. Richard Furey
  • Mr. Michael Jordan
  • Mr. Sean Mayo
  • Mrs. Pamela Parker
  • Mrs. Margaret Seymour
  • Mr. Michael Taylor

Overseas Visits

To ask the President of the Board of Trade what was the (a) budgeted and (b) actual expenditure by his Department on (1) internal and (2) overseas travel by the President of the Board of Trade in 1992–93 after 11 April 1992 and so far in 1993–94.

The expenditure incurred by my Department from 11 April 1992 to 31 March 1993 on my domestic travel was £8,745, and on my overseas travel was £5,866. From 1 April 1993 to 8 February 1994 the equivalent figures were £8,727 on my domestic travel and £16,360 on my overseas travel. These figures do not include the cost to my Department of my car. My Department does not allocate budgets for travel by individual Ministers.

Scott Inquiry

To ask the President of the Board of Trade what is the total cost paid out to witnesses attending the Scott inquiry under the provisions available under the order 62, r 12(1) of the rules of the Supreme Court, by the costs branch of the Treasury Solicitor's Department; and to whom such expenses have been paid.

To date, no expenses have been paid for legal costs to witnesses before the Scott inquiry.

Value Added Tax (Domestic Fuel)

To ask the President of the Board of Trade what estimates he has made of the reductions in consumption of domestic fuel resulting from the imposition of value added tax.

My Department has published a range of energy demand projections in "Energy Paper 59", a copy of which is in the Library of the House. Those projections showed domestic sector energy demand approximately 6 per cent. higher in 2000 than in 1990. The imposition of VAT on domestic fuels is expected, in the long run, to reduce domestic sector consumption of coal by about 2 per cent. and of electricity and gas by about 4 per cent. This takes no account of the effects of any offsetting measures.

Accounts Services Agency

To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will make a statement about the outcome of the review of options for the future of the Accounts Services Agency.

PA Consulting Group has completed its review of the options for the future of the Accounts Services Agency. In parallel, the Department has reviewed the scope for its financial accounting services to be met from the private sector, concluding that all but a small number of the services currently supplied by the agency could be contracted out, with appropriate safeguards.I have accepted PA's recommendations that:

the proposal for a management-led employee buy-out should be declined, primarily because it was based on the assumption that competitive tendering was unnecessary. Competition is essential to ensure value for money;
the agency should be moved into the private sector by competitive tendering of the services contract; and
the contract should be offered with the expectation that the agency's existing staff and assets would be transferred to the successful bidder.

The agency needs the expertise, financial resources, and freedom of the private sector to be able to improve its efficiency and to take full advantage of market opportunities. Strategic contracting out has been chosen as the preferred route to achieve this because it focuses on the service contract to DTI, and it would enable more staff and assets to be transferred to the private sector. Substantially the same outcome would be achieved as if the alternative route of privatisation had been chosen, but at a lower cost and on a shorter time scale.

This course of action will allow the Department to obtain the best value for money in the provision of its financial accounting services. PA estimates that the saving could be 10 to 20 per cent. per annum. Up to 90 permanent staff could transfer to the contractor. This will ensure continuity in the supply of a core service to the Department. The agency will gain access to the expertise and financial resources of the private sector which will give the existing team the freedom to take advantage of market opportunities without the constraints of operating in the public sector. This will result in a better service to all its customers and greater opportunities for its staff than would have been possible if the agency were to have remained in public sector ownership.

Human Genes

To ask the President of the Board of Trade what guidelines he has produced for the research councils on the patenting of human genes; what discussions he has had on this subject with his European counterparts; and if he will make a statement.

I have been asked to reply.I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to him by my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Trade and Industry on 1 February,

Official Report, columns 619–20. This reply makes it clear that the Office of Science and Technology supports the policy of the Medical Research Council in not filing any further patent applications for human DNA sequences of unknown function.

I am very happy to inform the hon. Member that the United States National Institutes of Health and the Medical Research Council have today agreed to withdraw their patent applications for cDNA sequences of unknown utility. The MRC, with the support of the Government, has always argued that these applications should not be granted. I welcome the co-operation between the United Kingdom and the United States on this important issue.

Rover Group

To ask the President of the Board of Trade on what date British Aerospace advised the Minister of its intention to sell Rover to BMW; and on what date the Minister notified the Japanese ambassador of this intention.

[holding answer 8 February 19941: British Aerospace advised the Department in confidence of its decision in principle to sell Rover shortly after the BAe board meeting on 27 January and also subsequently, again in confidence, of the final decision shortly after it was made on 29 January. The Government did not notify the Japanese ambassador of BAe's decision.

Environment

Local Government Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will give details of the block grants and rate support grant allocated to authorities in west Yorkshire for each year since 1983; and if he will list the services covered by the grants.

The available information is set out in the table. The rate support grant was not a service-specific grant and nor is revenue support grant. Both were or are paid to support expenditure which local authorities incur in performing their functions and which but for these grants, and national non-domestic rates from 1 April 1990, would have to be met from local taxes.

Rate support grant £000s

1983–84

1984–85

1985–86

1986–87

1987–88

1988–89

1989–90

West Yorkshire100,312102,681115,699
Bradford114,808114,773120,735131,371143,296156,111171,750
Calderdale44,57544,90145,41351,96857,00359,95960,907
Kirklees89,42191,64093,145106,650118,107126,061124,237
Leeds123,940125,009114,626135,324144,776145,847138,844
Wakefield57,46458,59855,41362,97167,39167,60865,314
West Yorkshire Police Authority23,26827,64237,05139,252
West Yorkshire Fire Authority8,5079,2848,03010,165
West Yorkshire Transport Authority4,7287,5875,2085,111

Block Grant £000s

1983–84

1984–85

1985–86

1986–87

1987–88

1988–89

1989–90

West Yorkshire100,312102,681115,699
Bradford110,697110,644116,591127,203139,098151,875167,473
Calderdale49,96443,27743,77650,31455,33758,27759,205
Kirklees86,26688,46089,938103,406114,827122,739120,865
Leeds116,342117,367106,947127,602137,007138,013130,946
Wakefield54,51855,63152,42459,95164,34064,51762,178
West Yorkshire Police Authority23,26827,64237,05139,252
West Yorkshire Fire Authority8,5079,2848,03010,165
West Yorkshire Transport Authority4,7287,5875,2085,111

Revenue Support Grant £000s

1990–91

1991–92

1992–93

1993–94

Bradford157,783172,080236,612237,755
Calderdale39,87338,43266,93765,840
Kirklees82,49282,049138,135132,425
Leeds137,665141,144242,216232,336
Wakefield45,03744,07187,12886,905
West Yorkshire Police Authority50,369
West Yorkshire Fire Authority24,101
West Yorkshire Transport Authority

Notes:

1. Following the introduction of the community charge system in 1990 the rate support grant was replaced by the revenue support grant.

2. Block grants form part of rate support grant. Block grants ceased to exist following the introduction of the community charge system.

3. West Yorkshire was one of the metropolitan county councils abolished in 1986. Its functions were then passed onto the metropolitan districts, the police, fire and civil defence, and transport authorities.

4. Under the community charge system, 1990–91 to 1992–93, RSG was paid into the collection funds administered by the metropolitan districts. For this reason there were no figures for RSG to the police, fire and transport authorities.

5. Under the council tax system, transport authorities do not receive RSG.

Pollution

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, pursuant to his answer of 2 February, Official Report, column 799, if Her Majesty's inspectorate of pollution will publish the monitoring results of the Eskmeals site to which he refers.

The decision to publish the monitoring results of the Eskmeals site is a matter for my right hon. and learned Friend the Secretary of State for Defence.

Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, pursuant to his answer of 2 February, Official Report, column 794, if he will set out the points on THORP raised with him on 16 December 1993 by the ambassador of the Irish Republic.

No. Such communications between the United Kingdom and other Governments are treated in confidence.

Effluent Discharge Charging Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the revised effluent discharge charging scheme launched by the National Rivers Authority.

The NRA's original scheme of charging for discharges came into effect in July 1991. As promised at that time, we have now reviewed it in the light of experience and on the basis of full consultation. We concluded that, in general, dischargers were satisfied. However, some changes have been made which will result in lower bills for some dischargers, particularly smaller businesses. There will also be an allowance for seasonal discharges which will benefit camping and caravan sites in particular. The NRA's considerable efforts in improving efficiency mean there will be no increase in either the application charge or the annual charge factor for 1994–95. The new arrangements will be introduced on 1 April 1994 and run until 31 March 1999.

Tower Block Properties

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what study his Department has made of the extent to which estate agencies are refusing to deal with properties which are situated above the fifth floor in tower blocks bought under the right-to-buy legislation; and if he will make a statement.

None. The Department has no evidence to suggest this is a widespread problem. Research has been commissioned into the scale and range of problems leaseholders of council flats have with service charges and resale of their dwellings. Preliminary data are expected shortly.

Owner Occupation

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what percentage of homes in the United Kingdom were owner-occupied in each year since 1987.

Estimates by type of tenure of the stock of dwellings in the United Kingdom appear in "Housing and Construction Statistics, Great Britain". Figures of owner-occupied dwellings expressed as a percentage of total dwelling stock are shown in table 9.3 of the 1982–92 annual edition for each year from 1987 to 1992.A copy of this publication is in the Library.

Forestry

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what steps the Government have taken to implement the recommendations made in the first report of the Select Committee on the Environment of Session 1992–93, on forestry and the environment—HC, 1992–93, No. 257.

The Government have already implemented several of the Select Committee's recommendations, including the publication on 25 January of our response to the Rio forest principles, "Sustainable Forestry: The UK Programme". Other matters are under consideration. We will be providing the Select Committee with a follow-up report before the Whitsun recess.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, how much public money was paid to private landowners in the last financial year as an inducement not to plant conifers; what were the highest sums of money that were paid to landlords for not planting conifers; and to whom these sums were paid.

Within the last financial year no new management agreements which compensate landowners for not planting conifers have been made in England by English Nature. I will write to the hon. Member with details of any such payments made under existing management agreements.

South Crofty Tin Mine

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what assessment has been made of the costs of any closure of the South Crofty tin mine in Cornwall on the environment, in particular the financial impact on the National Rivers Authority operation at Wheal Jane; and if he will make a statement.

The NRA does not expect any additional cost to its operations at Wheal Jane but, as contingency planning, is investigating what might need to be done to avoid pollution were South Crofty to close.

Local Government Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the estimated net aggregate expenditure of (a) county councils and (b) district councils in the current financial year.

County councils' and shire districts' budgeted net revenue expenditure for 1993–94 is £18,025 million and £3,202 million respectively.

Gloucester Grove Estate

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) if he will meet a deputation of tenants from Gloucester Grove estate in Southwark;(2) if he will visit Gloucester Grove housing estate;(3) if he will make a statement about the estates action programme improvement of the Gloucester Grove estate in Southwark;(4) if he will make a statement about phase 7 improvements to Gloucester Grove housing estate in Southwark;(5) how many of the blocks in the Gloucester Grove housing estate remain to be improved; and if he will make a statement.

Estate action improvements have been in progress on the Gloucester Grove estate since 1986–87. The Government have already made available £8·6 million of resources and have earmarked a further £8·85 million for phases 5 and 6 which are currently on site. These phases will be completed in 1996–97 and will complete the improvement of 10 blocks in total.The London borough of Southwark submitted a bid for a further eight blocks to be included in the 1994–95 estate action programme. Competition for resources was extremely tight, with 47 bids for support in London alone, and it was not possible to support that bid this year.At the end of phase 6, 19 blocks will remain unimproved. Future proposals for these blocks will form part of Southwark's proposed strategy for five council estates in the Peckham area. I hope that the proposed partnership between the borough, the private sector and housing associations will produce some imaginative proposals for improvements and a mixture of tenures on Gloucester Grove and the other estates.I have visited Southwark estates on a number of occasions in recent years and spoke to tenants from Gloucester Grove at Southwark's housing investment programme presentation in October 1992. Efforts are now best directed towards drawing up realistic proposals within Southwark's strategy for the area.

Local Government Commission

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what recommendations were put forward with regard to Southport by the Local Government Commission prior to the beginning of the Lancashire review.

It was the Local Government Boundary Commission, abolished in October 1992 and the Local Government Commission's predecessor, which conducted a review of the boundaries of Sefton metropolitan borough with West Lancashire and Wirral. In its final report, submitted in June 1992, report No. 664, it recommended only minor boundary changes. The Secretary of State accepted these recommendations and an order was made on 1 May 1993, with the boundary changes taking effect from 1 April 1994—SI 1206/93.

Local Government Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what discussions he has had with representatives of Liverpool city council in respect of its standard spending assessment; and if he will make a statement.

My hon. Friend the Minister for Local Government and Planning met a delegation from Liverpool city council, on 17 January, to discuss Liverpool's proposed standard spending assessment for 1994–95.

Shire Counties (Expenditure)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will set out the standard spending assessment and the expenditure levels for each shire county for each of the last eight years, the current year and his proposals for 1994–95; and if he will set out the percentage change in each case (a) between each year and (b) over the full range of years for which figures are available.

[holding answer 3 February 1994]: I have placed in the Library tables showing: standard spending assessments for the years 1990–91 to 1994–95; grant-related expenditure assessments for the years 1985–86 to 1989–90; and equivalent expenditure figures for the years 1985–86 to 1993–94 for each shire county. Since comparisons cannot be made between GREs and SSAs, nor between equivalent expenditures under the two regimes, the percentage changers are given between each year, between 1985–86 and 1989–90, and between 1990–91 and 1994–95.

Touche Ross

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if his Department or any agencies for which he is responsible has engaged the services of the firm Touche Ross or any of its partners since 1 July 1993.

holding answer 3 February 1994]: The Department of the Environment has engaged the services of Touche Ross since 1 July 1993 to a total value of £178,000.

Education

Further Education Colleges

To ask the Secretary of State for Education what provision has been made for the public accountability of further education colleges incorporated under the provisions of the Further and Higher Education Act 1992; and if he will make a statement.

The framework for the public accountability of colleges in the further education sector is set by the financial memorandum between the Department and the Further Education Funding Council, and the financial memoranda between the council and colleges. The financial memorandum between the Department and the council makes it clear that it is part of the duty of the chief officer of the council, as accounting officer, to satisfy himself that further education colleges have appropriate arrangements for financial management and accounting.Under the financial memoranda between the council and colleges, colleges are required to provide the council with audited accounts for each financial year. Each governing body must ensure that its college has a sound system of internal control and must appoint an audit committee and internal audit service for the college. The council may undertake examination of colleges' internal financial and management controls. Colleges' books and records are open to inspection by the council and by the Comptroller and Auditor General.

Office For Standards In Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Education what proportion of (a) primary schools and (b) secondary schools in London, Ofsted expects to inspect in the academic year 1993–94.

The arrangements for inspecting schools under the Education (Schools) Act 1992 are a matter for Ofsted.I have asked Professor Sutherland to write to the hon. Member.

Environmental Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Education what further guidance will be given on schools' environmental management practices as indicated in the sustainable development strategy.

The guidance promised in the United Kingdom strategy on sustainable development will be published later this year.It will be in the form of a simple environmental audit scheme which the schools can carry out themselves to evaluate and improve the environmental impact of their school buildings.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education (1) what plans he has for schools to have a policy for environmental education guaranteeing provision and continuity between different subject areas of the curriculum;(2) if he will make it his policy to encourage all schools to appoint a co-ordinator for environmental education;(3) if he will publish guidance to advise schools of good practice in teaching about care for the environment;(4) what plans he has for providing guidance to schools on delivering environmental education on biodiversity and sustainable development;(5) what plans he has to provide grants to voluntary bodies to produce teaching resources and facilities that promote the concept of sustainability declared at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development.

Provided that the statutory requirements are met, it is for the individual school to determine the character of its curriculum, its organisation and the mode of its delivery, taking account of any relevant information or advice produced by the Office for Standards in Education. Where environmental education is addressed through the statutory subjects of the national curriculum, content and continuity will be specified within the statutory documents. My right hon. Friend is giving priority to the revision of these documents and has no plans to publish additional guidance for schools on these matters. He does not publish curriculum resources and has no plans to fund voluntary or other bodies to do so. He prefers to provide specific grant to support expenditure by schools on books, materials and equipment or teacher training, as they see fit to develop national curriculum provision.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education what plans he has to ensure that within the school's inspection framework the responsibility of schools for raising awareness and understanding of the environment and conservation issues is subject to inspection and comment.

Under the Education (Schools) Act 1992, registered inspectors conducting inspection of schools must report on the quality of education and standards achieved in schools in accordance with Ofsted's pubished framework for inspection.I have asked Professor Sutherland to write to the hon. Member.

Funding Levels (Disputes)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education what mechanisms exist to resolve any dispute or disagreements between the Further Education Funding Council and individual colleges, including disputes over levels of funding; and if he will make a statement.

In the first instance, my right hon. Friend would expect a college to pursue its concerns with the Further Education Funding Council; in the last resort it could complain to the Secretary of State.If the Secretary of State is satisfied that the Further Education Funding Council has failed to discharge its duties under the Education Acts, he may issue a direction to the council under section 57 of the Further and Higher Education Act 1992. If he is satisfied that the council is exercising its functions unreasonably, he may issue a direction under section 68 of the Education Act 1944, as applied by paragraph 9 of schedule 8 to the Further and Higher Education Act 1992. The Further and Higher Education Act 1992 also gives the Secretary of State power to issue general or special directions to the council. Special directions may, in particular, relate to the provision of financial support by the council in respect of activities carried on by a particular institution. The Secretary of State would expect to exercise this power only in very exceptional circumstances.

Further Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Education what is his policy on the publication of names and addresses of chairpersons and members of further eduction colleges incorporated under the provisions of the Further and Higher Education Act 1992; and if he will make a statement.

Under the charter for further education, colleges are expected to publish the names of governors and how to contact them, which would normally be through the college. There is no expectation that governors' private addresses should be published.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education what provisions exist for the independent monitoring of the financial situation of further education colleges incorporated under the provisions of the Further and Higher Education Act 1992; and if he will make a statement.

Independent monitoring of the financial position of colleges in the further education sector is secured through the requirement in the financial memoranda between the Further Education Funding Council and colleges for the appointment of an audit committee, and also through the requirement on colleges to appoint external auditors. In addition, under section 53 of the Further and Higher Education Act 1992, colleges' accounts are open to inspection by the Comptroller arid Auditor General.

Ministerial Visits

To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many official engagements have been carried out in the last year by each Education Minister (a) in total, (b) at grant-maintained schools and (c) at local education authority schools.

The figures requested are as follows:

1Total number of official visitsOf which: Visits to schools
GM SchoolsLEA Schools
Secretary of State76321
Baroness Blatch521712
Mr. Forth84132
Mr. Squire731511
Mr. Boswell13629
TOTAL4213885
1 The figures cover all Ministers' official engagements, including school visits, conferences, receptions, and other speaking engagements, such as those at official lunches and dinners.

National Heritage

Foreign Visitors To London

To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage what advice he will seek from the Chief Secretary to the Treasury about encouraging foreign visitors to London; and if he will make a statement.

None. It is not for the Chief Secretary to the Treasury to advise on such matters of policy.

Public Bodies

To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage who are the members currently appointed to the board of the Royal Armouries.

The current members of the Roy al Armouries board of trustees is as follows:

  • Lord Eden of Winton (Chairman)
  • Rufus Bond-Gunning
  • David Chandler
  • Lady Cooksey
  • Richard Fortin
  • John Hale
  • Robert Hardy
  • Geoffrey Lewis
  • The hon. Francis Plowden
  • Field Marshall Sir John Stanier
  • The Duke of Wellington

To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage who are the members currently appointed to the Broadcasting Standards Council.

The current members of the Broadcasting Standards Council are:

  • Lady Howe (Chairman)
  • Dame Jocelyn Barrow OBE
  • Ms Sally O'Sullivan
  • Mrs. Rhiannon Bevan
  • Mr. Matthew Parris
  • Dr. Jean Curtis-Raleigh
  • The Reverend John Lang

To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage who are the members currently appointed to the board of the Horniman museum.

The members of the board of trustees of the Horniman museum are:

  • Dame Margaret Weston (Chairman)
  • His Honour Judge Brian Galpin
  • Dr. Eileen Hooper-Greenhill
  • Michael Homiman Esq.
  • Dr. Schuyler Jones
  • Donald Kirkham Esq.
  • Dame Unity Lister
  • Prof. Ghillean Prance
  • Ronald Watts Esq.
  • Michael Wheeler Esq.

To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage who are the members currently appointed to the Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts.

The present members of the Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts are:

  • Dr. Gerald Aylmer DPhil FBA (Chairman)
  • David Vaisey FSA
  • Viscount of Arbuthnott CBE DSC FRSE
  • Lord Camoys
  • Lord Egremont DL
  • Dr. Joan Thirsk FBA
  • Sir Matthew Farrer KCVO
  • Sir John Sainty KCB
  • Miss Barbara Harvey FSA FBA
  • Prof. R. H. Campbell
  • Sir Keith Thomas FBA
  • The Very Reverend Henry Stapleton
  • The Rt. Hon. Lord Blake Dlitt FBA JP
  • John W. Ehrman FBA
  • Prof S. F. C. Milsom QC FBA
  • Patrick Cormack MP FSA

To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage who are the members currently appointed to the board of the national maritime museum.

The members of the board of trustees of the national maritime museum are:

  • Lord Lewin KG CGB LVO DSC (Chairman)
  • Sir Nigel Broackes
  • Professor Alastair Couper FNI FRICS
  • J. G. Davis Esq. CBE FCIT FCIS
  • HRA Duke of Edinburgh KG KT OM GBE PC FRS
  • Sir David Hardy
  • Robin Knox-Johnson Esq. CBE RD
  • H. U. A. Lambert Esq. MA FIB
  • Dr. Paul Murdin OBE
  • Mrs. Coral Samuel
  • Sir Charles Henderson Tidbury
  • Arthur Burton Weller Esq.

National Lottery

To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage if companies and consortia which plan to devote their profits to charitable causes will be eligible for consideration when he decides where to award the contract, or contracts, to manage the national lottery.

The responsibility for licensing a body corporate to operate the national lottery lies with the director general, who will consider all applications.

Defence

Trident

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if the Trident D5 missile that the United Kingdom is purchasing from the United States of America has been flight-tested with more than eight re-entry vehicles.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to his answers to the hon. Member for Leyton (Mr. Cohen) of 16 December, Official Report, column 903, on test firing, and the hon. Member for Western Isles (Mr. Macdonald) of 18 January, Official Report, column 505, on a processing margin, what is Her Majesty's Government's policy in respect of the maximum number of Trident missiles to be purchased from the United States; and if he will make a statement.

We plan to purchase sufficient Trident missiles from the United States to maintain a minimum nuclear deterrent well into the next century. It is not our policy to comment on the total number of missiles to be purchased.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what is the technical maximum number of warheads that the United Kingdom's Trident submarines will be capable of deploying.

Each United Kingdom Trident submarine will be technically capable of carrying a maximum of 192 warheads. However, we have announced that each Trident submarine will deploy with no more than 96 warheads and may carry a significantly lower number.

Nuclear Weapons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what are the implications of a cut-off in military fissile material production for (a) the planned Trident deployment and (b) the production of other future United Kingdom nuclear weapons systems.

We hope to be able to work towards a multilateral and verifiable cut-off in the production of fissile material for explosive purposes which has potential value for non-proliferation efforts. It would be premature to comment on the implications for the United Kingdom until the details of such a cut-off have been agreed.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if the United Kingdom has the capability to recycle military fissile material, currently deployed in its strategic nuclear weapons and arising from the dismantlement of some of its tactical nuclear weapons, for use in its Trident missiles.

Yes. The United Kingdom has the facilities for, and extensive experience in, the dismantling of redundant nuclear wapons and in the recycling of the fissile material.

Defence Staff

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish a table showing the number, location, service and rank of defence and service attaché and defence adviser posts in foreign and Commonwealth countries as of (a) April 1990 and (b) at the latest date for which figures are available together with similar figures for dedicated support staff; if he will publish similar figures for the British defence staff in the United States of America; and if he will make a statement.

Tables showing the number, location, service and rank of defence and service attaché, defence adviser posts and dedicated support staff in foreign and Commonwealth countries as of 1 April 1990, table 1, and 1 February 1994, table 2, and British defence staff in the United States of America as of April 1990 and January 1994, tables 3 and 4, are being placed in the Library of the House.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will set out the financial arrangements for funding defence and service attaches and defence advisers and their support staff in foreign and Commonwealth countries.

Funding of accredited service attaches, defence advisers and dedicated support staff is undertaken by the Ministry of Defence and Foreign and Commonwealth Office. The Ministry of Defence funds pay and allowances as well as necessary equipment including official transport. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office provides accommodation, office facilities, communications and security for Ministry of Defence personnel in post.

Public Bodies

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence which appointments since 1979 to public bodies or posts for which he is responsible have included candidates nominated by the Chief Whip's Office; if any nominees by this source have been appointed; and if he will give details.

It is not the practice of Her Majesty's Government to answer parliamentary questions about discussions and consultations between Departments and offices of Government relating to public appointments.

Royal Small Arms Factory, Enfield

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for South Shields (Dr. Clark), of 20 January, Official Report, column 825, if he will set out the reason why the information requested on arms manufacture at the royal arms factory, Enfield is not available from official sources.

When the royal ordnance factories were incorporated in 1985, all records were retained by Royal Ordnance plc, except those that were returned to the Ministry of Defence for preservation as public records. The returned files do not contain the information requested by the hon. Member for South Shields.

Surplus Equipment

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what is the normal procedure for the sale of surplus or obsolescent equipment.

My Department arranges sales of surplus equipment through Government-to-Government and Government-to-industry contracts, competitive tenders, public auctions and private treaty sales. These take into account the type and condition of the equipment and the available market opportunities.

Jet Provost Trainers

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many Jet Provost trainers are to be sold in the current financial year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence to whom and under what procedure Jet Provost trainers have been sold; how many have been sold; and what financial gain resulted to Her Majesty's Government.

Since April 1990, 115 Jet Provost aircraft have been sold to over 20 different customers, by competitive tender, public auction and private treaty arrangements. Receipts have totalled some £600,000.

Arms Sales

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether contingent liabilities exist for the United Kingdorn Government in sales of arms or arms-related sales by the Government, its agents, including DESO or IMS Ltd., or as part of Government-to-Government arms deals.

Yes. The supplementary statement to the Consolidated Fund and National Loans Fund Accounts 1992–93, Cm 52, contains information on contingent liabilities.

Arms Sales

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence which countries have been the top 20 buyers of British arms since 1979.

Details of purchasers of British defence equipment are given in table 1.11 of the United Kingdom Defence Statistics. A copy of the 1993 edition has been placed in the Library of the House.

Defence Arms Control Unit

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the role and function of the defence arms control unit.

The main function of the defence arms control unit, now known as the proliferation and arms control secretariat, is to co-ordinate and provide advice on defence policy aspects of United Kingdom's involvement in non-proliferation, arms control and disarmament negotiations.

Exercise Arctic Express

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what is the expected cost of participation of British forces in exercise Arctic Express.

The expected cost to the United Kingdom for exercise Arctic Express will be some £2,950,000. NATO will, however, refund part of the cost of air transport movement, reducing the final cost to a figure of some £2,600,000.

Sarajevo

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he is prepared to offer mortar-locating radar and other detection equipment to United Nations forces deployed in Sarajevo; and if he will make a statement.

It is for the United Nations to determine the equipment needs of their forces in the former Yugoslavia. Any United Nations request for additional equipments would be given due consideration.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what consideration he has given to the use of air power to protect the civilians of Sarajevo in accordance with United Nations resolutions; and if he will make a statement.

The North Atlantic Council's decision of 9 February authorised the use of air strikes in close co-ordination with the United Nations Secretary-General, if heavy weapons are not withdrawn from around Sarajevo or placed under UNPROFOR's control within 10 days. Air strikes can be launched with immediate effect, at the request of the United Nations, against heavy weapons responsible for any further attacks on civilian targets in the city.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what consideration he has given to the establishment of an effective United Nations safe area in and around Sarajevo; and if he will make a statement.

United Nations Security Council resolution 836 established six safe areas in Bosnia, including Sarajevo. NATO has called on the parties to lift the siege of Sarajevo and made clear the alliance's readiness to carry out air strikes if heavy weapons are not withdrawn or placed under United Nations control within 10 days. The Government fully support the efforts of NATO and the United Nations.

Bosnia

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what discussions he has had with his United Nations counterparts about the deployment of additional forces in Bosnia; and if he will make a statement.

My right hon. and learned Friend the Secretary of State for Defence, has had many discussions, including on former Yugoslavia issues, with his counterparts from various United Nations member nations. Additional Dutch, Malaysian and Pakistani forces are currently deploying to Bosnia following a request from the United Nations Secretary-General last year for troops to implement United Nations Security Council resolution 836, which established six safe areas.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what was the nature and extent of the discussions he has had with his NATO counterparts about the deployment of additional forces in Bosnia; and if he will make a statement.

My right hon. and learned Friend the Secretary of State for Defence is in regular contact with his NATO counterparts about all aspects of our military deployments in former Yugoslavia. The deployment of additional personnel to UNPROFOR in Bosnia is, however, a matter for the United Nations.

Search And Rescue Helicopters

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will give a full breakdown of the total annual support costs for helicopter search and rescue operations including support manpower costs at RAF Brawdy in (a) 1992–93 and (b) 1993–94.

Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

Alcoholic Beverages

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will take steps in any EC Council discussions concerning the rules for listing ingredients and additives in alcoholic beverages to ensure consistent and simultaneous treatment for beer, wines and spirits.

Yes. During negotiations on the European Commission's proposal for ingredients listing of alcoholic drinks the United Kingdom will seek to ensure that any measures which are eventually adopted apply consistently and simultaneously to the different product sectors.

Milk Marque

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many representations she has received in favour of the deferral of the vesting date of Milk Marque from April to November 1994; and if she will make a statement.

On 9 February the Milk Marketing Board submitted amendments to its reorganisation scheme. These provide, inter alia, for a vesting day of 1 November 1994. We shall be conducting a formal consultation on the scheme as amended.

Animal Diseases (Monitoring)

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will make a statement about the future of the computer monitoring programme for the spread of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, salmonella and other animal diseases at the Central Veterinary Laboratory.

Responsibility for this matter is delegated to the Central Veterinary Laboratory and I have asked the chief executive to reply to the hon. Gentleman direct.

Letter from T. W. A. Little to Mr. Paul Tyler, dated 11 February 1994:

The Minister has asked me to reply to your question about the computer monitoring programme operated at CVL for the spread of BSE, Salmonella and other animal diseases.
CVL has built excellent systems for the monitoring of a range of animal diseases including those you mention. The systems have produced accurate and up-to-date figures for some years and our expert team will continue to maintain and refine the systems for as long as they are required.

Scotland

Nhs Trusts

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if chairmen and directors of trusts are required to declare an interest when any relevant business is being considered and withdrawn from further consideration of such business.

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what steps he has taken to ascertain whether all trust executive and non-executive directors have been provided with the training necessary for them to have an adequate appreciation of the control mechanisms and rebating arrangements for financial matters.

I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave on 28 January 1994, Official Report, column 461.

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what guidance he has given to non-executive directors of trusts on their powers to act independently where they are in disagreement with chairmen and executive directors.

Each trust board is required to have an audit committee, the composition of which includes non-executive directors but not the chairman or executive directors, and with a prescribed remit.

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if all board members of NHS trusts have been required to declare any interest that may be relevant before he appoints them; and if such interests are made known to the other members of the board to which they were appointed.

Such information is not currently sought from trust board members prior to their appointment but the position is under review. Any trust director who has an interest in a contract or other matter at a trust board meeting is required by regulations to disclose that interest and not to take part in consideration or discussion of it.

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what guidance he has given to NHS trusts on the exercise of financial control.

In addition to the training provision for their directors referred to in my reply to the hon. Member on 28 January 1994, Official Report, column 461, NHS trusts in Scotland are issued with a financial manual "NHS Trusts: Guidance for Financial Managers" which includes guidance on financial controls.

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list for each non-executive member he has appointed to the board of an NHS trust (a) directorships, including non-executive directorships, held in private companies or plcs, (b) ownership or part ownership of private companies, businesses or consultancies likely or possibly seeking to do business with the NHS, (c) majority or controlling shareholdings in a charity or voluntary body in the field of health care, social services or housing and (d) any material connection with a voluntary or other body contracting for services with NHS organisations.

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what guidance he has provided for chairmen of trusts on retaining the independence of their chief executives.

No specific guidance has been issued but the roles and relationships of chairmen and chief executives are covered in the induction courses arranged centrally for new trust chairmen and in support provided locally by the management development group.

Pollution Control

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will place in the Library copies of the minutes of the Scottish pollution control co-ordinating committee since 1990.

The Scottish pollution control co-ordinating committee is a sub-group of the Royal Environmental Health Institute of Scotland, which officials of the Scottish Office normally attend. Its purpose is to promote the consistent application of district and islands' pollution control functions throughout Scotland and offer a forum for the exchange of information between local authority and Government officials.I have arranged with REHIS for copies of the committee's minutes since its inception in June 1992 to be placed in the Library.

Glass Recycling

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what information he has received from local authorities in Scotland regarding the current status of glass recycling.

Forty-eight Scottish local authorities have submitted draft recycling plans which give details of their current arrangements for collecting glass for recycling and of their plans for future glass collection. In addition, representations giving information about the impact of recent changes in prices paid for glass cullet have been made on behalf of the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, Argyle and Bute district council, Inverness district council and Cumnock and Doon Valley district council.

Forestry Commission

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many submissions have now been received by the review group considering the future of the Forestry Commission; and how many of those submissions addressing the question of privatisation of the commission were opposed.

[holding answer 10 February 1994]: Over 3,500 individuals and organisations have sent representations both to the forestry review group and to Ministers, about the work currently being carried out by the group. A large majority of these submissions which addressed the question of privatisation were opposed to it, with many referring to concerns about the implications for access, environmental considerations and timber production. All representations are being taken into account by the group as it continues its work.

Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list where cattle infected with BSE have been located in Scotland, the species involved, the number involved in each incident and the date on which each case was discovered; and if he will make a statement.

[holding answer 7 February 1994]: The information up to 31 December 1993 is given in the

1993
BreedBordersCentralDumfriesFifeGrampianHighlandLothianOrkneyStrathclydeTaysideShetlandWestern Isles
Unknown916311111208
Aberdeen Angus2157314345338
Ankole1
Ayrshire3943212421
Belgium Blue3121
Blonde D'Aquitaine31
Blue Grey21
Charolais1132112227
Chianin x Simmental1
Friesian23403233712029291326424
Galloway12
Holstein4221101113
Hereford5510802993322594556
Highland1
Jersey3
Limousin181444730221308
Luing1
Red Friesian213
Red Holstein1
Rogmanola1
Saler1
Shorthorn1111
Simmental1543711651751619
TOTAL1466963398365926833473136
1992
BreedBordersCentralDumfriesFifeGrampianHighlandLothianOrkneyStrathclydeTaysideShetlandWestern Isles
Unknown218193
Aberdeen Angus26240313431387
Ayrshire12385611612
Belgian Blue11111
Blonde D'Aquitaine1121
Blue Grey112
British White1
Charolais336145
Devon1
Friesian222336222125272815261261
Galloway121
Gelbvieh1
Holstein412119128
Hereford35759197017614248
Jersey113
Limousin10223426152711
Lincoln Red11
Luing1
Murray Grey1
Red Holstein1
Rogmanola1
Shorthorn2211
Simmental722283313361425
South Devon1
Sussex4
TOTAL11240576653126745244711361
1991
BreedBordersCentralDumfriesFifeGrampianHighlandLothianOrkneyStrathclydeTaysideShetlandWestern Isles
Unknown3423
Aberdeen Angus1111781173
Ayrshire111971321
Belgium Blue1
Blonde D'Aquitaine1
British White11
Charolais1111
Friesian171017320547912582
Gelbvieh11

following table. This shows confirmed cases of BSE by year of report, broken down by breed. Cross breeds have been listed under the main breed.

Breed

Borders

Central

Dumfries

Fife

Grampian

Highland

Lothian

Orkney

Strathctyde

Tayside

Shetland

Western Isles

Holstein14111281
Hereford1732192615111628
Jersey111
Limousin525164131
Luing1
Murray Grey1
Red Friesian1
Red Holstein1
Shorthorn11
Simmental174461266
Sussex31
TOTAL58212543512434154214492

1990

Breed

Borders

Central

Dumfries

Fife

Grampian

Highland

Lothian

Orkney

Strathclyde

Tayside

Shetland

Western Isles

Unknown114131
Aberdeen Angus2564153
Ayrshire1521412
Belgian Blue1
Blonde D'Aquitaine1
Charolais11
Friesian587122396446515
Galloway1
Holstein1411
Hereford11134341731514
Highland11
Jersey1
Limousin12424
Lincoln Red1
Shorthorn1
Simmental3155322
Sussex4
TOTAL24119438100289613442

1989

Breed

Borders

Central

Dumfries

Fife

Grampian

Highland

Lothian

Orkney

Strathclyde

Tayside

Shetland

Western Isles

Unknown41
Aberdeen Angus1312
Ayrshire22111122
British White1
Friesian45218214614041
Holstein214
Hereford1253104137
Jersey4
Limousin2
Red Friesian1
Shorthorn11
Simmental32
Sussex2
TOTAL973311421272661711

June to December 1988

Breed

Borders

Central

Dumfries

Fife

Grampian

Highland

Lothian

Orkney

Strathctyde

Tayside

Shetland

Western Isles

Unknown1
Aberdeen Angus2
Ayrshire1131
Friesian12792116
Holstein11
Hereford1111
Jersey1
Limousin1
Simmental111
TOTAL1312012322113

Before June 1998

Breed

Borders

Central

Dumfries

Fife

Grampian

Highland

Lothian

Orkney

Strathclyde

Tayside

Shetland

Western Isles

Unknown31
Aberdeen Angus1
Ayrshire1
Friesian—_11
Holstein11
Hereford21
Total152121

Public Appointments

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland which of the public appointments for which he is responsible require advance notice to and consultation with the Chief Whip's Office; and which appointments made since 1979 have been so notified and consulted upon.

It is not the practice of Her Majesty's Government to answer parliamentary questions about discussions and consultations between Departments and offices of Government relating to public appointments.

Home Department

Remand Centres

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will give a breakdown by race, on the most convenient date, of the inmates held in the remand centres at Featherstone, Cardiff, Dorchester, Exeter,

Population in remand centres on 30 June 1992: by establishment and ethnic origin
England and WalesNumber
Ethnic origin
EstablishmentWhiteWest Indian, Guyanese, AfricanIndian, Pakistani, BangladeshiChinese, Arab, mixed originOther, not recorded (including refusal)All persons in establishment
Hindley37043162395
Low Newton1272232279
Moorland143011175463
Feltham11946913166298
Haslar11145242010110
Norwich1561259
Rochester19234132132
Brinsford12852117111335
Cardiff193253103
Dorchester133121138
Exeter16421168
Glen Parva12591115112298
Stoke Heath13253943
Swansea160161
All remand centres2,2512099695312,682
1Establishments serving more than one purpose, the numbers above refer only to those held in the remand component.

Brixton Prison

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the reason for the recent trawl at Her Majesty's prison Brixton for staff; and how many prison staff had been subjected to compulsory transfers from Brixton in 1993.

Feltham, Glen Parva, Gloucester, Wigan, Iancaster, Durham, Doncaster, Northallerton, Norwich, Reading, Rochester, Market Drayton, Swansea and Milton Keynes.

Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter from Derek Lewis to Ms Diane Abbott, dated 11 February 1994:

The Home Secretary has asked me to reply to your recent Question asking if he will give a breakdown by race, on the most convenient date, of the inmates held in the remand centres at Featherstone, Cardiff, Dorchester, Exeter, Feltham, Glen Parva, Gloucester, Wigan, Iancaster, Durham, Doncaster, Northallerton, Norwich, Reading, Rochester, Market Drayton, Swansea and Milton Keynes.

The readily available information is for 30 June 1992 and is given in the attached table. Some of the Prison Service establishments listed in the Question were not operating as remand centres on that date. The breakdown given is in terms of the ethnic classification used at the time. A new ethnic coding was introduced in prisons from 1 October 1992.

Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter from Derek Lewis to Mr. Doug Hoyle, dated 11 February 1994:

The Home Secretary has asked me to reply to your recent Question concerning the reason for the recent trawl at Brixton prison for staff, and how many prison staff had been subjected to compulsory transfers from Brixton in 1993.
Following an increased demand for staff in the north of England, a number of staff took the opportunity to transfer there from Brixton. Subsequently, a national trawl was held to replace some of the staff at Brixton.
Prison officers are mobile grades and all permanent transfers are "compulsory". Where practicable the wishes of staff are taken into account. If this is not possible staff are issued with a compulsory transfer notice against which they can appeal.
In 1993, 26 officers were issued with compulsory notices in Brixton. 19 of these appealed and the compulsory notices were subsequently withdrawn. Seven did not appeal and were subsequently transferred to Belmarsh.

Police On The Beat

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what representations he has had from (a) hon. Members, (b) chief constables and (c) chairmen or members of police authorities, asserting that police beat cover has been reduced in their areas since 1992; and if he will make a statement on the measures he is taking to ensure that any increase in the number of police officers is reflected by more police actually on the beat.

Views about policing levels and beat cover feature regularly in the numerous representations and correspondence which we receive on the general subject of policing. Information in the form requested could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.Current initiatives designed to put more officers on the beat include reducing paperwork, civilianisation and reorganising management structures. One of the key objectives set for the service is to provide high visibility policing so as to reassure the public

Number of males aged under 21 prosecuted at the magistrates courts and convicted1 at all courts of buggery offences—1982 to 1986 England and Wales
19821983198419851986
ProsecutionsConvictionsProsecutionsConvictionsProsecutionsConvictionsProsecutionsConvictionsProsecutionsConvictions
With a boy under the age of 16 or with a woman or an animal18173223302325233131
By a man with a male person of the age of 16 or over without consent5521445244
By a man of the age of 21 or over with another male person under the age of 21 with consent211314245
By a man with another male person other than above531152110632
Male member of staff of hospital or mental nursing home committing buggery or an act of gross indecency on a male patient
Man committing buggery or an act of gross indecency with mentally disordered male patient who is subject to his care
Attempt to commit buggery with a boy under the age of 16 or with a woman or an animal131127
Attempt by a man to commit buggery with a male person of the age of 16 or over without consent221
Attempt by a man of the age of 21 or over to commit buggery with another male person under the age of 21 with his consent
Attempt by a man to commit buggery with another male person other than above1

Wymott Prison

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many prisoners at Her Majesty's prison Wymott have been charged for the riot and destruction of the prison; and what has been the range of punishments provided.

Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter from Derek Lewis to Mr. Doug Hoyle, dated 11 February 1994:

The Home Secretary has asked me to reply to your recent Question about how many prisoners at Her Majesty's Prison Wymott have been charged for the riot and destruction of the prison; and what has been the range of punishments provided.
Lancashire Constabulary are still continuing their investigation into the disturbance. They have not yet charged any individual person, but he result of their inquiries should be known soon, together with any decision to lay charges.
As a result of the internal Prison Service investigation into the disturbance, fourteen prisoners were charged with an overall total of 24 offences under Prison Rules. Three of these prisoners were found guilty of an overall total of four offences and the individual level of punishments awarded in these cases ranged from 7 to 28 days added to their sentences. One prisoner was found not guilty of the charges against him. Charges against the remaining ten prisoners have at this stage been adjourned pending the outcome of the police investigation or other internal Prison Service

Buggery

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department on how many occasions over the past decade any male under the age of 21 years has been (a)prosecuted or (b) prosecuted and convicted for the offence of buggery.

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

Prosecutions

Convictions

Prosecutions

Convictions

Prosecutions

Convictions

Prosecutions

Convictions

Prosecutions

Convictions

Assault with intent to commit buggery1121

1 Includes persons proceeded against in earlier years or for other offences.

Note: Generally, attempting, conspiring, inciting, aiding, abetting, causing or permitting a crime is classified under the heading of the crime itself.

Number of nudes aged under 21 prosecuted at the magistrates courts and convicted 1 at all courts of buggery offences—1987 to 1992 England and Wales

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

Prosecutions

Convictions

Prosecutions

Convictions

Prosecutions

Convictions

Prosecutions

Convictions

Prosecutions

Convictions

Prosecutions

Convictions

With a boy under the age of 16 or with a woman or an animal322750404230463153193730
By a man with a male person of me age of 16 or over without consent63413246522
By a man of the age of 21 or over with another male person under the age of 21 with consent244212121
By a man with another male person other than above31351132452
Male member of staff of hospital or mental nursing home committing buggery or an act of gross indecency on a male patient
Man committing buggery or an act of gross indecency with mentally disordered male patient who is subject to his care
Attempt to commit buggery with a boy under the age of 16 or with a woman or an animal6610665524553
Attempt by a man to commit buggery with a male person of the age of 16 or over without consent21
Attempt by a man of the age of 21 or over to commit buggery with another male person under the age of 21 with his consent12
Attempt by a man to commit buggery with another male person other than above11
Assault with intent to commit buggery111112

1 Includes persons proceeded against in earlier years or for other offences.

Note: Generally, attempting, conspiring, inciting, aiding, betting, causing or permitting a crime is classified under the heading of the crime itself.

Youth Custody

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list for each year since 1989, (a) the average age and (b) the average length of sentence of the total number of young people serving youth custody sentences, who have been reclassified from young offender to adult status prior to reaching 21 years of age.

Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter from A. J. Butler to Mr. William Etherington, dated 11 February 1994:

RECLASSIFICATION OF YOUNG OFFENDERS

The Home Secretary has asked me, in the absence of the Director General from the office, to reply to your recent Question asking if he will list for each year since 1989 the total number of young people serving youth custody sentences who have been reclassified from young offender to adult status before reaching 21 years of age.

The information requested is not available. The only information is for the number of people in the prison population at a particular date who had previously been reclassified. Provisional information for 30 June 1993 shows that about 90 young offenders were recorded centrally as being reclassified as adults in Prison Service establishments in England and Wales before reaching 21 years of age.

Paedophiles

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has for legislation to make it possible to prosecute British nationals who commit paedophilic acts overseas when they return to Britain.

The Government deplore sexual offences against children wherever they occur. Our own law against such abuse is rightly severe. However, our courts' jurisdiction is territorially based rather than nationally based and we have no plans to extend their jurisdiction over paedophile offences committed by British citizens abroad. We believe that such jurisdiction would be largely unenforceable in practice and that where such offences have been committed abroad it is right for the country concerned to enforce its own law.Unlike some countries which do claim a wide extra-territorial criminal jurisdiction over their nationals, the United Kingdom is willing to extradite its own nationals to stand trial for these offences abroad, subject to the usual safeguards. We are also willing to give legal assistance to other countries under the Criminal Justice (International Co-operation) Act 1990.

Public Bodies

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department who are the members currently appointed to the police arbitration tribunal.

The police arbitration tribunal comprises a chairman and two members. Sir John Wood CBE is the chairman and Mr. G. L. Dennis and Mr. M. J. M. Clarke are the two members.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department who are the members currently appointed to the police negotiating board.

Professor L. C. Hunter is the appointed independent chairman to the police negotiating board. The deputy chairmen are Mr. T. Carlile and Mr. J. F. L. Pease-Watkin.The constitution of the police negotiating board stipulates that the board shall consist of an official side and a staff side. It is for those authorities and bodies to decide who should represent them on the board. The current membership is as follows:POLICE NEGOTIATING BOARDMEMBERS:

Home Office

  • Mr. I. M. Burns
  • Mr. T. Morris
  • Mr. C. L. Scoble
  • Mrs. P. G. W. Catto
  • Mr. I. F. Smith

Scottish Home and Health Department

Mr. B. J. O'Connor

Northern Ireland Office

Mrs. C. Collins

Police Authority for Nothern Ireland

Mr. A. Armstrong

Convention of Scottish Local Authorities

  • Mr. G. Stanfield
  • Mr. J. Jennings
  • Mr. H. Brown
  • Mr. E. B. Fallon

The Association of County Councils

  • Mr. C. F. Robinson
  • Mr. J. H. Collins
  • Mr. J. T. Meir
  • Mr. S. Bayes
  • Mr. B. Fippard
  • Mr. B. H. Drake
  • Mr. C. P. Hay
  • Mr. R. G. Owen
  • Mr. G. T. Theobald
  • Mr. D. Briggs
  • Mr. R. E. Meurie-Rees
  • Mr. T. G. Yarker
  • Mr. D. Sweasey

Association of Metropolitan Authorities

  • Mr. E. Bramfitt
  • Mr. G. Bundred
  • Mr. C. Swindell
  • Mr. S. Murphy
  • Mr. J. P. Mellor
  • Mr. J. W. Cranswick
  • Mr. C. Dale

The Metropolitan Police

Mr. D. Meynell

The Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and

Northern Ireland

  • Mr. J. Burrow
  • Mr. W. Lawrence

The Police Superintendents Association of England and Wales

  • Mr. D. Clark
  • Mr. D. Parkinson
  • Mr. V. Jones

The Police Federation for England and Wales

  • Mr. L. Williams
  • Mr. R. Coyles
  • Mr. R. Penn
  • Mr. A. Mason
  • Mr. J. Moseley
  • Mr. R. Oakley
  • Mr. G. Hyde
  • Mr. S. Cadmore
  • Mr. F. Broughton
  • Mr. D. Forsyth

The Association of Chief Police Officers (Scotland)

Mr. P. Mitchell

The Association of Scottish Police Superintendents

Mr. J. Johnston

The Scottish Police Federation

  • Mr. J. MacDonald
  • Mr. J. Marshall
  • Mr. I. Black
  • Mr. D. Keil
  • Mr. J. Fraser
  • Mr. S. Falconer

The Superintendents Association of Northern Ireland

  • Mr. W. Davidson
  • Miss A. Donald

The Police Federation for Northern Ireland

  • Mr. D. McClurg
  • Mr. S. Beattie

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department who are the members currently appointed to the Fire Services Research and Training Trust.

The trustees are as follows:

  • Mr. R. F. D. Shuffrey, CB, CVO, Chairman, formerly a Home Office Deputy Under-Secretary of State.
  • Mr. W. Baird, a former Assistant Under-Secretary of State in the Scottish Office.
  • Sir Kenneth Holland, CBE, QFSM, formerly Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Fire Services.
  • Mr. P. Quaile, recently retired as Deputy Chief General Manager of Sun Alliance and as Chairman of the Fire Protection Association.
  • Mr. I. Roy, a former Assistant Under-Secretary of State at the Home Office.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department who are the members currently appointed to the Advisory Council on Race Relations.

The members of the Home Secretary's Advisory Council on Race Relations are as follows:

Representative Members:

  • Mr. R. Gilbert (Confederation of British Industries)
  • Dr. S. Deshmukh (Trades Union Congress)
  • Mr. S. Gillings (National Association of Racial Equality Councils)
  • Mr. R. Govindia (London Boroughs Association)
  • Councillor T. Harris (Association of Metropolitan Authorities)
  • Mr. H. Ouseley (Commission for Racial Equality)
  • Councillor R. Place (Association of District Councils)
  • Vacancy (Association of County Councils)

Individual Members

  • Mrs. S. Ahmed
  • Ms B. Bernard
  • Mr. D. Bryan
  • Mr. T. Chan
  • Mrs. R. Howells
  • Mr. C. Kavallares
  • Mr. R. Mooneram
  • Mr. D. Neil
  • Mr. J. O'Loughlin
  • Councillor M. Rizvi
  • Mr. I. Sacranie
  • Ms A. Weekes

Prisons (Drug Abuse)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what research the Home Office has undertaken to determine the degree to which alcohol and illicit drug abuse is taking place in prisons; what change the figures represent on previous records; and what steps he has taken recently, or intends to take, in order to combat such abuse.

Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter from A. J. Butler to Mr. Frank Field, dated II February 1994:

The Home Secretary has asked me, in the absence of the Director General from the office, to reply to your recent Question about the research which has been undertaken to determine the degree to which alcohol and illicit drug abuse is taking place in prisons; what change the figures represent on previous records; and what steps he has taken recently or intends to take in order to combat such abuse.

It is extremely difficult to establish with any satisfactory degree of certainty the degree to which alcohol and illicit drug abuse is taking place in prisons. This is because prisoners are understandably reluctant to admit to contravening prison rules. Most research has therefore focused on the use of alcohol and drugs by prisoners before they were imprisoned. A survey of 1,751 men serving a prison sentence (Maden, Swinton and Gunn, British Journal of Addiction 1992) showed that in 1988–89 43 per cent. of male sentenced prisoners had used drugs in the six months before their arrest. In the report "Mentally Disorderded Offenders" which was produced for the Prison Service by the same authors found alcohol and drug dependency (diagnosed on the basis of daily use during the six month period prior to their offence) as in the table below. The figures do not include cannabis users.

Adult males

Young offenders

Females

Sample size1,365404273
Alcohol (per cent.)8·68·74·4
Drugs (per cent.)10·16·224·2

Research is currently being conducted for the Prison Service by the Drugs Addiction Unit at the Institute of Psychiatry to establish risk behaviour for HIV in prisons. This includes questions about current drug use which, if a satisfactory response rate is achieved, should provide better information on illicit drug use.

The availability and use of drugs in our prisons is a matter of concern. The Government will be bringing forward a clause for inclusion in the Criminal Justice and Public Order Bill to allow the Prison Service to test prisoners for drug misuse. In addition to this the Prison Service is reviewing existing policy relating to drugs and is developing a Drug Strategy which will address ways of reducing the supply of drugs, of reducing demand (by means of improved indentification and treatment for drug misusers) and improved support for prisoners who have become drug free in prison on their return to the community.

Race Relations

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what consideration has been given to the taking of legal action under the Race Relations Acts against the Hizb ut Tahrir organisation.

[holding answer 10 February 1994]: There is no legal action under the Race Relations Act 1976 which requires the involvement of the Attorney-General. Offences of incitement to racial hatred are covered by part III of the Public Order Act 1986 for which the Attorney-General's consent is required before a case can proceed.

Transport

Operator Licensing

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list the local authorities that responded to his consultation document on deregulation of operator licensing and those that opposed the proposals.

The 46 local authorities which responded to our consultation document are listed in the table. We made a number of proposals. The reaction to them was varied.

  • 1. Three Rivers District Council, Herts
  • 2. Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council
  • 3. Blaenau Borough Council, Gwent
  • 4. Dacorum Borough Council, Herts
  • 5. Mole Valley District Council, Dorking
  • 6. Milton Keynes Borough Council
  • 7. Gedling Borough Council
  • 8. West Devon Borough Council
  • 9. Hastings Borough Council
  • 10. Runnymede Borough Council
  • 11. South Lakeland District Council
  • 12. Wiltshire County Council
  • 13. Newbury District Council
  • 14. Runnymede Borough Council
  • 15. Weymouth and Portland Borough Council
  • 16. Birmingham City Council
  • 17. Rother District Council
  • 18. Worcester City Council
  • 19. Cherwell District Council
  • 20. Derbyshire County Council
  • 21. Mid-Beds District Council
  • 22. North Kesteven District Council
  • 23. Devon County Council
  • 24. Avon County Council
  • 25. Newark and Sherwood District Council
  • 26. Kent County Council
  • 27. Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority
  • 28. Nottingham City Council
  • 29. Norfolk Planning County Council
  • 30. Babergh District Council
  • 31. Bedfordshire County Council
  • 32. New Forest District Council
  • 33. Bawtry Town Council
  • 34. Swansea City Council
  • 35. South Norfolk District Council
  • 36. Lincoln City Council
  • 37. Copeland Borough Council
  • 38. Lewes District Council
  • 39. Southampton City Council
  • 40. Bedfordshire County Council
  • 41. Great Yarmouth Borough Council
  • 42. Winchester City Council
  • 43. London Borough of Wandsworth
  • 44. Shropshire County Council
  • 45. Suffolk County Council
  • 46. Burnley Borough Council
  • Health

    Health Authority Managers

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many managers were in post in each health authority and health trust in England in 1990–91 and 1992–93; and what was the total cost in each year.

    The information available will be placed in the Library. The figures need to be treated with considerable caution. The number of managers has been deliberately increased since the mid-1980s—not just since the reforms—because the service was previously undermanaged. Much of the increase shown in the table, however, arises from the reclassification of existing staff, including many senior nurses, as managers.

    Children (Birth Defects)

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many children in the northern region have been born with a defective hand in each year since 1989 and if she will also list the name of the village or town of each child.

    The information is shown in the table.

    The numbers of children born with a defective hand 1(ICDs 755.0, 755.1, 755.2, 755.4, 755.5, 755.8, 755.9) notified to OPCS in each year 1989 to 1992 for the Northern Regional Health Authority and individual district health authorities
    1989199019911992
    NORTHERN RHA45334734
    Hartlepool1213
    North Tees1021
    South Tees4434
    East Cumbria2012
    South Cumbria3025
    West Cumbria0312
    Darlington1040
    Durham4410
    North West Durham2301
    South West Durham6243
    Northumberland3392
    Gateshead1325
    Newcastle8362
    North Tyneside3221
    South Tyneside1141
    Sunderland5352
    1 ICD ninth revision international classification of disease code. The data are presented according to districts in order to protect the confidentiality of individuals.
    We have great sympathy for the parents of children who are born with limb defects. It is unfortunate that in the present state of scientific knowledge the causes of most defects of this kind are not known. We are aware of the need for a prompt and thorough investigation into the reports of unexpectedly high occurrences of birth defects.The investigation of recently suspected or reported clusters of limb reduction defects has been initiated by district health authorities, through directors of public health, who are taking expert advice, in concert with the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. For the last 30 years OPCS has maintained a national monitoring system for collecting data about malformations among newborn babies.OPCS is currently conducting a national analysis of limb reduction defects to scrutinise the geographical pattern. This should be completed within a few weeks. The Department, with OPCS, is in discussion with the environmental epidemiology unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, which also incorporates the small area statistics unit, to identify and make provision for the additional expertise that may be required.The results of these investigations will be considered carefully and decisions about any further action that might be necessary will be made as quickly as possible.

    Hospital Staff (Redundancies)

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list the number of redundancies among national health service hospital staff (a) by grade and (b) by reason for each year since 1988–89.

    Psychiatric Care

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) voluntary and (b) compulsory admissions to psychiatric hospital took place in each year since 1979.

    The information requested is shown in the table.

    Informal admissionsFormal admissions
    1979171,44017,849
    1980184,07618,514
    1981192,34018,571
    1982194,58417,959
    1983207,13216,918
    1984216,18316,361
    1985226,33117,287
    1986226,45916,696
    1987–88226,95216,777
    1988–89213,22817,240
    1989–90222,92417,312

    Notes:

    Figures shown for 1979–86 were collected by the mental health enquiry from all mental illness and mental handicap hospitals and units and include figures from special hospitals and private mental nursing homes. These were based on calendar years. From 1987–88, the figures refer to financial year and were collected on forms KH15—from all NHS facilities—and K037—from private nursing homes—and also directly from the Special Hospitals Service Authority.

    Mental Health Budget

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health what was the total mental health budget in each year since 1979.

    Information is not available in the precise form requested. The table shows the estimated total hospital and community health services expenditure in cash and constant price terms in England on mentally ill people for each year from 1978–79 to 1991–92, the latest year for which this information is available.

    Expenditure on mentally ill people in hospital and community health services (England)1
    (£) million
    YearCash1991–92 Prices2
    1978–794901,311
    1979–805931,359
    1980–817751,501

    Year

    Cash

    1991–92 Prices2

    1981–828601,519
    1982–839161,511
    1983–849651,521
    1984–851,0291,544
    1985–861,0771,531
    1986–871,1491,587
    1987–881,3021,707
    1988–8915571,9133
    1989–901,6621,9103
    1990–911,7851,8983
    1991–922,0852,0854

    1 Figures include direct patient treatment cost and indirect cost such as hospital administration.

    2 After allowing for general inflation.

    3 Figures from 1988–89 include expenditure on mental illness in and out-patients, day patients and community mental illness nursing. Prior to 1988–89, expenditure on community mental illness nursing was not separately identified, and was included with district nursing services.

    4 Figures are not comparable with earlier years due to significant changes to accounting policies, following the introduction of the internal market.

    Gp Fundholders

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health what was the extent of over or under-spending on general practitioner fundholder budgets for 1992–93 in each family health services authority and national health service region; and what sums were retained or returned by general practitioner fundholders in each case.

    Regional level information will not be available until all fundholder accounts have been audited and local arrangements for the voluntary return of savings have been completed. Local information, at family health services authority level, is not collected centrally.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many fundholding practices there are in the Lewisham, Lambeth and Southwark FHSA; and if she will list them with the amount of financial surplus for each practice for 1992–93.

    I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave the hon. Member for Woolwich (Mr. Austin-Walker) on 3 February at column 856.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health what was the average reimbursement to general practitioners for salaries for all staff in each year since 1990–91 excluding the general practitioner fundholding management allowance.

    I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave her on 21 January at column 888.

    Prescription Pricing Authority

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how many whole-time equivalent staff were employed by the Prescription Pricing Authority in each year since 1990; and what were the locations of their employment;(2) whether any part of the activities of the Prescription Pricing Authority is to be subjected to market testing in 1994–95;(3) what plans she has to change the structure, organisation or functions of the Prescription Pricing Authority.

    The numbers of whole-time equivalent staff employed by the Prescription Pricing Authority at each location are:

    1990–911991–921992–931993–94
    Newcastle upon Tyne738·7742·0747·811071·1
    Durham177·1170·1165·5161·8
    Wakefield163·4160·4168·6165·1
    Preston90·989·390·888·0
    Liverpool11·91123·7126·8127·9
    Sheffield126·0126·0128·2128·5
    Manchester122·2125·3130·5128·2
    West Bromwich123·3160·5130·5132·9
    Bolton164·6164·7188·7195·2
    TOTAL1,825·31,862·01,877·412,198·7
    1Includes 314·5 seconded Department of Social Security whole-time equivalent staff formerly employed in the health benefits unit—which became part of the Prescription Pricing Authority on 1 April 1993.
    There are no plans to change the functions of the Prescription Pricing Authority. Any changes to the structure or organisation of the authority will depend upon the results of its market-testing programme.Initially five areas of activity have been identified for market testing: prescription processing; management and maintenance of the authority's estate; mainframe computer support; security, portering, catering and central administrative services; and information division processing support. A rolling programme of market testing is well under way, with contracts for prescription processing due to be let by April 1995. Contracts for other services will follow, with the current programme completed by March 1996. Testing of remaining areas of the authority's work will then be considered.

    Dental Health (Children)

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list each health authority in the country in order of the dental health of their children, with such information as is available in relation to the flourine level of the water in each area; and if she will make a statement.

    Statistics on dental health for health authorities are not available centrally. The most recent dental caries prevalence surveys of children by health authorities was carried out during 1991–92. Details of the average number of decayed, missed or filled teeth of five-year-olds and the percentage of the population receiving fluoridated water supplies in each district surveyed is contained in briefing produced by the British Flouridation Society. The information is based on surveys collated by the British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry, copies of which will be placed in the Library.

    Cancer Research

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many hospitals or medical research institutions, including universities, are currently conducting research under what contracts placed by her Department into cancer causation by use of modified viruses; and if she will make a statement.

    The Department holds no contracts to fund any research into cancer studies by use of modified viruses.

    Ethnic Minority Staff

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will give the percentage of ethnic minority staff at the management executive and her Department in each year since 1990–91.

    The percentage1 of ethnic minority staff in the Department, which includes the National Health Service Management Executive, on 1 April each year since 1990–91 is:

    Per cent.
    1990–919·8
    1991–9212·9
    1992–9314·9
    1993–9415·6
    1 Based on the response to the Department's ethnic origin survey.
    Comparative data are not available for the NHS Management Executive, but at 7 February 1994 the percentage was 5.9.

    Ambulance Service, Northumbria

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health what percentage of the responses to emergency calls of Northumbria ambulance trust were met within the (a) rural and (b) urban standards; and what percentage of such calls within the metropolitan county of Tyne and Wear area were met within the urban standard.

    The performance of the Northumbria ambulance service national service trust is measured centrally against the 19-minute national patients charter emergency response time standard for rural ambulance services. In 1992–93 Northumbria ambulance service achieved the standard in 99 per cent. of cases. Information covering the metropolitan county of Tyne and Wear is not collected centrally.The Northumbria ambulance service NHS trust has, however, been contracted locally to meet the more stringent, 14-minute, urban response time. This standard has also been achieved consistently, despite a 15 per cent. increase in emergency calls last year.

    Sunderland General Hospital (Parking)

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many paid for car parking spaces there are at the Sunderland general hospital; what is the revenue from car parking spaces; what further car parking spaces are to be created; what contingency plans are available when all the car parking spaces are full; and whether the staff use the car parking spaces.

    This is a matter for the district health authority. The hon. Member may wish to contact Mr. George Bedell, chairman of the Sunderland district health authority, for details.

    Health Care, Sheffield

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list the land and buildings that are at present in the ownership, of the regional health authority in the Sheffield area.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health what has been spent within the Sheffield health authority area on work undertaken for or on behalf of Community Health Sheffield shadow trust on capital developments, including minor works in the 1993–94 financial year and the estimated expenditure in the 1994–95 financial year, within Community Health Sheffield arising from or consequent on such work for managerial, administrative and clerical facilities; and if she will make a statement.

    These are matters for Trent regional health authority. The hon. Members may wish to contact Sir Michael Carlisle, the chairman, for details.

    Waiting Times

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list by specialty for each trust in the Thames regions the average waiting time for a first appointment with a specialist and the average waiting time from the first appointment to subsequent treatment.

    Information on waiting times to first out-patient appointment is not yet collected. The last year for which figures are available by specialty on average waiting time from first out-patient appointment to subsequent treatment is 1991–92 and they were collected by district health authority and not by trust.

    Prescription Charges

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many times prescription charges have been raised since 1979; and if she will make a statement.

    Dr Helen Zeitlin

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health what correspondence she has received relating to the case of Dr. Helen Zeitlin; what action she will take to ensure that a prompt and fair settlement is reached between Dr. Zeitlin, the Alexandra hospital and the health authority; and if she will make a statement.

    Two letters have been received in recent months. In November 1992 Dr. Zeitlin won her appeal against dismissal and was subsequently reinstated. Any current issues relating to her employment are a matter between Dr. Zeitlin and her employer.

    Midwives

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will give the percentage of front line ambulances by region which have a paramedic able to support a midwife in an emergency.

    The Government have set a target for every front-line ambulance to have a paramedic by the end of 1995. It is not known how many paramedics are able to support a midwife in an emergency at present, but training in this area is being developed.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Healph if she will list by region how many midwives have worked in the national health service for each of the last five years; how many midwives by region have direct access to beds in maternity units; and how many women delivered in a maternity unit are admitted under the management of the midwife.

    The information regarding the number of midwives working in the national health service for each of the last five years is shown in the table.Information regarding the number of midwives who have access to beds in maternity units and the number of women delivered in maternity units who are admitted under the management of the midwife is not collected in the form requested.

    Hospital and community midwives by region in England 1988–92 At September (excluding agency)
    Whole-time equivalent
    19881989199019911992
    Hospital midwives
    Northern1,0601,0301,0401,0701,160
    Yorkshire1,2701,2801,3001,2801,260
    Trent1,3301,3601,4001,3901,410
    East Anglian610600600580550
    North West Thames940950960910890
    North East Thames1,3001,2701,3401,3501,420
    South East Thames8106101,0701,0301,090
    South West Thames8308407908601,120
    Wessex910910900900890
    Oxford780800830850790
    South Western780970950860900
    West Midlands1,7301,7701,8501,8001,890
    Mersey780850890890900
    North Western1,7201,6501,6801,7101,760
    Special Health Authorities150140607070
    England14,99015,04015,66015,54016,090
    Community midwives
    Northern260260240240240
    Yorkshire340350350340340
    Trent490490480490490
    East Anglian220210210210190
    North West Thames240250250220200
    North East Thames280300270240240
    South East Thames230170330280290
    South West Thames200210190180230
    Wessex250240240240250
    Oxford180180180180180
    South Western240240280330340
    West Midlands480480460420480
    Mersey240230230220220
    North Western460460470490440
    Special Health Authorities1010202020
    England4,1104,0704,2004,1004,160
    Community and Hospital Total19,09019,11019,86019,64020,250

    Source: HAP(STATS)B non-medical work force census.

    Notes:

    1. Figures are independently rounded to the nearest 10 whole-time equivalents.

    2. England totals may not equal the sum of components due to rounding.

    Fhsas (Dental Services)

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many family health services authorities have been unable to provide emergency dental services in each month since July 1992.

    I shall let the hon. Member have such information as is available as soon as possible.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients have contacted each FHSA asking for help in finding a dentist in each month since July 1992.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many FHSAs have referred patients who have been unable to obtain treatment from a general dental practitioner to (a) the community dental service, (b) the hospital dental service and (c) a salaried dentist, in each month since July 1992.

    The available information is shown in the table.

    Total number of Family Health Services Authorities referring patients to either Community Dental Service, Hospital Dental Service or a salaried dentist since July 19921 England
    Week endingFHSAs
    3 July 199220
    10 July 199223
    17 July 199219
    24 July 199218
    31 July 199222
    7 August 199226
    14 August 199221
    21 August 199224
    28 August 199225
    4 September 199223
    11 September 199226
    18 September 199223
    25 September 199224
    2 October 199222
    9 October 199224
    16 October 199223
    23 October 199224
    30 October 199226
    6 November 199228
    13 November 199228
    20 November 199227
    27 November 199225
    4 December 199226
    11 December 199227
    18 December 199227
    25 December 1992
    1 January 1993
    8 January 199325
    15 January 199328
    22 January 199331
    29 January 199330
    5 February 199325
    12 February 199326
    19 February 199330
    26 February 199328
    5 March 199327
    12 March 199328
    19 March 199327
    26 March 199325
    2 April 199325
    9 April 199325
    16 April 199325
    23 April 199323
    30 April 199328
    7 May 199326
    14 May 199327
    21 May 199324
    28 May 199326
    4 June 199324
    11 June 199327
    18 June 199325
    25 June 199327
    2 July 199323
    9 July 199325
    16 July 199326
    23 July 199326
    30 July 199325
    6 August 199325
    13 August 199323
    20 August 199326
    27 August 199322

    Week ending

    FHSAs

    3 September 199324
    10 September 199325
    17 September 199326
    24 September 199324
    1 October 199325
    8 October 199327
    15 October 199327
    22 October 199326
    29 October 199322
    5 November 199325
    12 November 199326
    19 November 199324
    26 November 199326
    3 December 199327
    10 December 199328
    17 December 199329
    24 December 1993
    31 December 1993
    7 January 199425
    14 January 199429
    21 January 199429
    28 January 199430
    4 February 199431

    1 Data were not collected over the Christinas and new year period.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many FHSAs have appointed salaried dentists; and how many dentists have been appointed.

    There are currently 92 salaried dentists employed by 22 family health services authorities.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many dentists have given written notice to each FHSA to remove their name from the dental list since July 1992.

    The information is shown in the table. The total number of dentists who have given written notice to family health services authorities to remove their names from the dental list since July 1992 is 297. A total of 347 dentists were added to the lists in the period 30 June 1992 to 30 September 1993.

    Number of dentists who have given written notice to remove their name from the dental list since July 1992, by Family Health Services Authority England
    Family Health Services AuthorityNumber of dentists
    England297
    Cleveland
    Cumbria
    Durham
    Northumberland
    Gateshead
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne
    North Tyneside
    South Tyneside
    Sunderland
    Humberside3
    North Yorkshire
    Bradford
    Calderdale16
    Kirklees
    Leeds
    Wakefield3
    Derbyshire
    Leicestershire
    Lincolnshire
    Nottinghamshire
    Barnsley
    Doncaster
    Rotherham
    Sheffield

    Family Health Services Authority

    Number of dentists

    Cambridgeshire
    Norfolk3
    Suffolk
    Bedfordshire
    Hertfordshire
    Barnet
    Brent and Harrow
    Ealing, Hammersmith and Hounslow1
    Hillingdon
    Kensington, Westminster and Chelsea1
    Essex3
    Barking and Havering29
    Camden and Islington
    City and East London42
    Enfield and Haringey30
    Redbridge and Waltham Forest
    East Sussex13
    Kent35
    Greenwich and Bexley21
    Bromley13
    Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham13
    Surrey1
    West Sussex
    Croydon5
    Kingston and Richmond
    Merton, Sutton and Wandsworth16
    Dorset
    Hampshire2
    Wiltshire
    Isle of Wight
    Berkshire
    Buckinghamshire
    Northamptonshire
    Oxfordshire1
    Avon
    Cornwall and Isles of Scilly1
    Devon1
    Gloucestershire
    Somerset3
    Hereford and Worcester
    Shropshire
    Staffordshire
    Warwickshire
    Birmingham
    Coventry
    Dudley1
    Sandwell
    Solihull
    Walsall
    Wolverhampton1
    Cheshire
    Liverpool
    St. Helens and Knowsley
    Sefton4
    Wirral1
    Lancashire
    Bolton16
    Bury
    Manchester1
    Oldham
    Rochdale
    Salford2
    Stockport3
    Tameside1
    Trafford11
    Wigan

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many dentists who have not given notice to leave the dental list have given written notice to the FHSA to deregister some or all of their continuing care arrangements for adult patients in each month since July 1992; how many dentists have deregistered patients; and how many patients have been deregistered.

    Tables will be placed in the Library which show for each month the number of dentists in contract with each family health services authority who have deregistered adult patients and the total number of adult patients deregistered since July 1992. Where dentists hold contracts with more than one FHSA, the numbers of dentists quoted could include duplications. The information provided weekly by FHSAs since July 1992 shows that in the period up to 4 February 1994, 2,513 dentists gave written notification to deregister 629,318 adult patients.Despite these notified deregistrations, the total number of adult patients registered with a dentist in England increased by over 1 million—4·96 per cent.—from 20·580 million to 21·601 million over the period 1 July 1992 to 30 November 1993.

    Dental Treatment (Costs)

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health what was the average cost per adult patient for each course of dental treatment in 1992–93.

    The average cost per course of dental treatment for an adult patient in 1992–93 was £34·77.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) nursing mothers and (b) pregnant women received dental treatment in 1990–91, 1991–92 and 1992–93; and what was the average cost per patient in each case.

    Information on the number of nursing mothers and pregnant women who received dental treatment in these years is not available. Figures for the number of courses of treatment received by women in these two categories are shown in the table. Data are not available for 1990–91.The table shows the average cost per course of treatment for nursing mothers and pregnant women in each year. This is defined as the gross fee received by the dentist for the course of treatment. Pregnant women and nursing mothers are exempt from dental charges.

    General dental services: number of courses of treatment and average cost for expectant and nursing mothers1 1990–91–1992–93 England
    Number of courses of treatmentAverage cost per course of treatment2
    YearExpectant mothersNursing mothersExpectant mothers (£)Nursing mothers (£)
    1991–92452,555665,31033·3145·24
    1992–93443,922672,60931·8442·69
    1 Mothers aged 18 and over.
    2 The cost is the gross fee received by the dentist for the course of treatment.
    3 Dental fees were reduced by 7 per cent, in July 1992.

    Self-Governing Trusts

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will make it her policy that staff and their representatives are involved in the agreement and determination of performance-related pay schemes in self-governing trusts.

    This is a matter for national health service trusts to decide locally.

    Racal Healthlink Service

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health what data is transferred between health regions and districts through the Racal Healthlink service.

    The Racal Healthlink service was set up primarily to link the primary health care services and associated national bodies: family health services authorities; the national health service central register; the Prescriptions Pricing Authority; and the Dental Practices Board. In general, these bodies exchange information to assist their administrative operations for example, patient registration details and claims for items of service.For regional and district health authorities, although central records are kept about the number of connections and who is connected to Healthlink, records are not kept about the type of data sent between these organisations.

    Nhs Communications

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health what data is expected to be transferred through a new NHS national communications network service.

    The new national health service-wide communications network will cover the whole range of NHS communications activities: telephone calls, computer networking, radio mobile communications and the electronic transmission of images. Data could be of any of the types currently exchanged on paper.

    Patient Records (Confidentiality)

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to her answer of 12 January, Official Report, column 197–98, what plans she has to assure the confidentiality of any patient records which are held on the new network.

    The national health service-wide networking programme has established a security project to develop the security policy and associated security mechanisms needed to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of all information passing across the new network. This work is being undertaken in full consultation with representatives of the medical profession.

    Regional Data Networks

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to her answer of 12 January, Official Report, column 198, what was the cost of formulating the business case for implementing a national spine to connect regional data networks.

    The estimated cost of developing the business case for a national spine facility was £290,000.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to her answer of 12 January, Official Report, column 198, who is carrying out the work to connect the region-wide data networks; and what is the cost.

    The competitive procurement of nationwide area networking services was initiated recently. It is intended that there will be one provider of the spine connecting region-wide networks and two or three providers of region-wide networks to maintain competitive pressures. The cost will be known when tenders are evaluated.

    Breast Cancer

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health what features of the structure of the health service between England and Wales underlie the different availability of information regarding the percentage of women screened for breast cancer in the last three years between the two countries.

    Statistical information relating to the performance of the breast screening programme in England is collected annually by the Department of Health from each of 87 local screening programmes. This information is submitted as a standard statistical return.In Wales, the screening programme is provided from only three screening centres, due to the much smaller population. Each of these screening centres is part of a single organisation, Breast Test Wales. This enables the Welsh Office to acquire information more easily on all aspects of the programme. Breast Test Wales also provides annual statistical returns identical to those used in England.

    Alden Hey Hospital, Liverpool

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many orthopaedic patients are on the waiting list at Alden Hey hospital in Liverpool.

    I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to him on 19 January at column 617.

    Nhs Appointments (Cornwall)

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list the current non-executive directors and members of the Cornwall district health authority, Cornwall community healthcare trust and the Royal Cornwall hospitals trust, together with the dates when they were appointed and the period of their respective appointments.

    [pursuant to his reply, 20 January, c. 793–94]: I regret the information supplied was incorrect. The correct information is as follows:

    In respect of the Royal Cornwall hospitals NHS trust. Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust

    The Chairman of the Royal Cornwall hospitals NHS trust is Mr. John Williams. He was appointed on 1 December 199:1 and his term of office expires on 30 November 1995.

    The non-executive directors of the trust and their terms of appointment are as follows:

    Non-Executive Director

    First Appointed

    Current Term of Office Expires

    Mr. Gilbert McCabe1 November 199130 November 1997
    Mr. Edward Latham1 November 199130 November 1997
    Mr. Anthony Hill19 January 199430 November 1995
    Mrs. Doreen Henderson1 October 199230 May 1994

    There is currently a vacancy among the non-executive directors following Mr. Williams's appointment as chairman.

    South Western Rha

    To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list the current membership of South Western regional health authority together with the dates when they were appointed and the period of their respective appointments.

    [pursuant to his reply, 20 January 1994, c. 794]: I regret the information supplied in respect of the non-executive members of South Western regional health authority was incorrect. The correct information is as follows:The non-executive members of South Western regional health authority and their terms of appointment are as follows:

    Non-Executive MembersFirst AppointedCurrent Term of Office Expires
    Sir John Kingman26 July 199031 October 1996
    Dame Margaret Fry26 July 199031 October 1996
    Mr. Upert Woodburn1 January 199331 October 1996
    There are currently two vacancies on the board.