Written Answers To Questions
Wednesday 29 June 1994
Lord Chancellor's Department
Personal Injury Cases
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what was the average value, as stated by plaintiffs, of those personal injury claims commenced in the county courts for each year since 1990.
The information requested is not recorded throughout the year but only from cases concluded during the months of March and November. From these samples, the average figures can be projected as follows:
| Year | £ |
| 1990 | 3,273·71 |
| 1991 | 3,561·31 |
| 1992 | 3,956·86 |
| 1993 | 5,054·47 |
| 1994 | 6,895·96 |
:To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department how many lawyers currently employed by his Department have a minimum of three years experience in dealing with personal injury cases.
No statistics are kept on the information which the hon. Member seeks, and it could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
:To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department if he will list the main concerns expressed by respondents to the consultation paper entitled, "Small Personal Injury Claims."
Approximately 150 responses to the consultation paper were received and they are currently being evaluated. Respondents came from a wide variety of interested groups and their responses varied accordingly in scope and tone. The majority of respondents who disagreed with the proposals were those who consider the small claims procedure an inappropriate forum for personal injury claims under any circumstances, particularly because it limits recoverable costs.
:To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department if he will define the meaning of non-standard injury as set out in paragraph 33, part a, in the consultation paper, "Small Personal Injury Claims."
:Paragraphs 31 to 34 of the consultation paper set out the safeguard which will ensure that each case is dealt with in the appropriate forum according to subject matter, and not value alone. It is proposed that, where a district judge decides that a case is unsuited to arbitration, for example because an injury had come about in complex circumstances or was of unpredictable severity, he would be able to refer the matter for trial.
District Judges
:To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department if he will outline the full range of duties, other than disposing of cases by trial, which are performed by district judges.
A description of the jurisdiction and duties of the office of district judge is contained in the consultation paper "Developments in Judicial Appointments Procedures" which was issued on 19 May 1994. Copies of the consultation paper have been placed in the Libraries of both Houses of Parliament.
Accountancy Firms
:To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department how many contracts and for what total sum were let out by his Department and agencies for which it is responsible to (a) Coopers and Lybrand, (b) KPMG Peat Marwick, (c) Ernst and Young, (d) Price Waterhouse, (e) Arthur Andersen, (f) Touche Ross, (g) Grant Thornton, (h) Robson Rhodes and (i) Pannell Kerr Forster for (i) privatisation, (ii) market testing, (iii) management advice, (iv) accounting, (v) audit, (vi) consultancy and (vii) other services in (1) 1980 to 1983, (2) 1984 to 1987, (3) 1998 to 1991 and (4) 1992–93.
The information that the Department has about these types of contract relates only to 1992–93 and is not broken down in a way which allows the question to be answered in the detail sought. However, on the best information currently available, total expenditure on external consultants during that year was £3.455 million. For projects costing less than £20,000 no detailed information is readily available, but for those above that amount which were completed in that year, the details are as follows:
| Consultants | Number of contracts | amount £000's |
| Coopers & Lybrand | 2 | 57 |
| KPMG | 2 | 115 |
| Ernst & Young | 2 | 52 |
| Price Waterhouse | 6 | 1,396 |
Northern Ireland
Water And Sewerage Services
:To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what plans he has for the reorganisation of water and sewerage services in Northern Ireland in advance of the privatisation of these services.
:To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what plans he has for the reorganisation of water and sewerage services in Northern Ireland in advance of the privatisation of these services.
:As my hon. Friend, the then Minister of State made clear to the House on 20 April 1993, the Government remain committed to the privatisation of water and sewerage services in Northern Ireland as soon as practicable, but will not be able to do so, for tehnical reasons, during the lifetime of the present Parliament. In the interim, I have decided that the Water Executive of the Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland, which is responsible for the delivery of water and sewerage services, should become a "next steps" agency not later than April 1996. This will enable the Water Executive to operate as a separate unit in the Department, within a framework of appropriate efficiency targets and performance measures, and will build on work to develop the commercial orientation of the organisation.
Driver And Vehicle Licensing
:To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what performance targets have been set for Driver and Vehicle Licensing Northern Ireland in 1994–95.
For 1994–95, the following key performance targets have been set for the agency:
- To meet an overall efficiency gain of 2 per cent.
- To reduce the unit cost per vehicle excise enforcement case completed to £21.73 (at 1992–93 prices).
- To dispatch 90 per cent. of registration books for new vehicles within 16 working days of the receipt of application.
- To dispatch 90 per cent. of refunds of vehicle excise duty within 11 working days of receipt.
- To dispatch 92 per cent. of vehicle excise licences within six working days of receipt of postal applications.
- To dispatch 92 per cent. of duplicate vehicle registration books within six working days of receipt of applications. To dispatch 96 per cent. of amended vehicle registration books (following changes to vehicles or keepers) within eight working days of receipt of applications.
- To dispatch 91 per cent. of ordinary driving licences within 11 working days of receipt of applications.
- To dispatch 96 per cent. of vocational driving licences within 11 working days of receipt of applications.
- To dispatch 91 per cent. of provisional driving licences within 10 working days of receipt of applications.
- To dispatch substantive replies to 90 per cent. of written inquiries within four working days of receipt.
- To limit maximum waiting time at local vehicle licensing offices to 25 minutes during peak periods (the first eight and last two working days of each month) and 10 minutes at other periods.
- To reduce the error rate (errors on any item sent out by the agency) to 0.5 per cent. of total agency output.
| (ecu million) | |||||
| 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 (provisional) | |
| United Kingdom | |||||
| Export Refunds | 2·250 | 3·724 | 3·141 | 2·433 | 2·673 |
| Private Storage Aid | 0·356 | 0·000 | 0·227 | 0·108 | 0·000 |
| Total | 2·606 | 3·724 | 3·368 | 2·541 | 2·673 |
| France | |||||
| Export Refunds | 12·657 | 4·628 | 6·391 | 3·277 | 6·236 |
| Private Storage Aid | 12·610 | 0·257 | 1·928 | 0·183 | -0·134 |
| Total | 25·267 | 4·885 | 8·319 | 3·460 | 6·102 |
| Germany | |||||
| Export Refunds | 6·028 | 22·072 | 47·824 | -20·260 | 32·485 |
| Private Storage Aid | 6·984 | -0·143 | 2·530 | 0·378 | -0·885 |
| Exceptional Support | 0·000 | 0·000 | 0·000 | 0·000 | 2·063 |
| Total | 13·012 | 21·929 | 50·354 | -19·882 | 33·663 |
Prime Minister
Disability
:To ask the Prime Minister when he last met representatives of organisations for, and of, disabled people to discuss the need for comprehensive antidiscrimination legislation; when he next plans to meet such representatives; and if he will make a statement.
I have had a number of meetings with interested parties. My right hon. Friend, the Minister for Disabled People, has also had a number of such meetings, including one with the all-party disablement group on 15 March. He keeps me fully informed of the issues which are discussed.
:To ask the Prime Minister what is the policy of Her Majesty's Government in relation to access by disabled people to buildings open to the public; and if he will make a statement.
I have been asked to reply.Section 4 of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970 and section 4 of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons (Northern Ireland) Act 1978 oblige those who provide buildings which are visited by members of the public to make provision for disabled people. In addition, the Government have introduced provisions within building regulations for the benefit of such people. These provisions apply predominantly to new buildings and some extensions.
Agriculture, Fisheries And Food
Pigs
:To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what amounts have been received in EC subsidies and support by British, French and German pig farmers in each of the last five years.
The CAP pigmeat regime is lightweight and very little direct support is available.Under the guarantee section of the common agriculture policy—FEOGA—expenditure on export refunds and private storage aid for pigmeat, neither of which are paid direct to producers, was as follows:
Copies of the FEOGA financial reports are in the House of Commons Library.
Refunds for certain pigmeat exports to non-EC countries are available to all member states. Germany has traditional markets in eastern Europe and is the third largest exporter of pigmeat from the EC to third countries.
Private storage aid schemes, when introduced by the EC, are also available to all member states and provide short-term relief from difficulties caused by seasonal oversupply of the pigmeat market. The United Kingdom pigmeat industry generally sees PSA schemes as being of little benefit and United Kingdom take up is very small.
Exceptional support measures can be introduced by the EC when orderly marketing cannot otherwise take place. As a result of outbreaks of classical swine fever in Germany, where movement restrictions exist, 2.063 mecu was paid during the 1993 FEOGA budget year and 56 mecu has so far been paid this year. No such measures have needed to be introduced in France or the United Kingdom.
EC veterinary funds can be made available to assist member states in eradicating certain animal diseases, including pig diseases. No such payments have been made to the United Kingdom in the last five years and details of any payments to France or Germany are not available to us.
On capital grant schemes, the ministry has paid £5·7 million to pig producers since 1989. A small element of this is reimbursed by the EC. Figures for France and Germany are not available to us.
Public Bodies
:To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will list those of her Department's advisory non-departmental public bodies which the Government are required to consult prior to legislation proposals; and in respect of which bodies the Government must publish their response to advice supplied by them.
:Prior to legislation proposals, the Government are required to consult the Advisory Committee on Pesticides, the Committee on Agricultural Valuation, the Sugar Beet Research and Education Council and the Veterinary Products Committee. They are not required to publish their responses.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will list the advisory non-departmental public bodies sponsored by her Department which have a statutory basis.
The following non-departmental public bodies have a statutory basis:
- The Advisory Committee on Pesticides
- The Agricultural Dwelling House Advisory Committees
- The Consumers' Committees for Great Britain and for England and Wales
- The Committees of Investigation for Great Britain and for England and Wales
- The Committee on Agricultural Valuation
- The Hill Farming Advisory Committee
- The Veterinary Products Committee.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will list her Department's advisory non-departmental public bodies which are required to produce annual reports.
:Only the Veterinary Products Committee is required to produce an annual report, but the Advisory Committee on Pesticides and the Food Advisory Committee also do so.
:To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will list the advisory non-departmental public bodies sponsored by her Department which are required to lay their annual reports before Parliament.
None.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what advisory bodies she has set up in her Department since the publication of "Public Bodies 1993".
:None.
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will list her Department's advisory non-departmental public bodies which are required to publish their advice to Government.
None, but in practice a number do so.
Meat Imports
:To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will list the countries, in order of frequency, from which meat treated with (a) clenbuterol and (b) other beta-agonists has been imported in each year since 1985.
:Beta-agonists—which include clenbuterol—are a group of drugs which have been used for a number of years in licensed veterinary medicines to treat respiratory ailments in cattle and horses and as an aid to cattle at the time of calving. There are no requirements for those importing meat into the United Kingdom to declare whether it has come from animals treated with these medicinal products. I regret therefore that I cannot supply the hon. Member with the information requested.
Bovine Tuberculosis
:To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will list the number of cases of bovine TB in cattle imported from Ireland in each year since 1990 and in each month of 1994.
The number of confirmed cases of bovine TB in cattle imported from Ireland in each year since 1990 were:
| Number | |
| 1990 | 12 |
| 1991 | 18 |
| 1992 | 3 |
| 1993 | 4 |
| 1994 | 1Nil |
| 1 Provisional figure as at 28 June. | |
:To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what methods of screening Irish cattle for bovine TB are in place; and what measures she intends to introduce.
All Irish cattle, except bullocks, are tested for bovine tuberculosis 60 days after importation. In addition, all animals in herds maintained by or which have regular intakes of Irish cattle are tested annually. The routine testing interval for herds which import bullocks from Ireland for fattening purposes is set at the discretion of the divisional veterinary officer. No further measures are considered necessary.
Dumb Cane
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what plans she has to bring forward measures to restrict the sale from supermarkets, garden centres and other retail outlets of Dieffenbachia picta—Dumb Cane—and other species of that genus, or to make the prominent display of safety warning labels mandatory at sites of sale; and if she will make a statement.
The conditions under which potentially hazardous plants are sold by supermarkets and garden centres is a matter currently being considered by the horticultural industry. An industry voluntary code of practice is in the final stages of preparation and is expected to be published later in the summer. This is an industry-led initiative and a good example of self-regulation.
Fish Marketing
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what fish producing organisations were consulted on her marketing development scheme.
The following organisations with an interest in fisheries were consulted on the proposals for the marketing development scheme:
- Anglo-North Irish Fish Producers' Organisation Ltd.
- Anglo-Scottish Fish Producers' Organisation Ltd.
- British Crayfish Marketing Association
- Cornish Fish Producers' Organisation Ltd.
- Fleetwood Fish Producers' Organisation Ltd.
- Fish Producers' Organisation Ltd.
- Grimsby Fish Producers' Organisations
- Institute of Fisheries Management
- Lowestoft Fish Producers' Organisation
- National Federation of Fishermen's Organisations
- New British Trout Association
- Salmon and Trout Association
- Shellfish Association of Great Britain
- South Western Fish Producers' Organisation Ltd.
- United Kingdom Association of Fish Producers' Organisations
- Yorkshire and Anglia Fish Producers' Organisation Ltd.
Market Testing
To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is her Department's policy towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing.
:The Department's policy is to review the scope for publication on a case-by-case basis having regard to the code of practice on open government and agreed contractual terms covering commercial confidentiality. The Department may in some cases publish a synopsis of the report rather than the report itself.
:To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if she will set out the total cost of external consultancy fees incurred by her Department in relation to market testing.
Over the period April 1992 to date the total cost of external consultancy fees incurred by the Department in relation to market testing is estimated to be £684,000.
National Heritage
Broadcasting
:To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage what consideration he has given to alternative sources of revenue for the BBC other than licence fees; and if he will make a statement.
Our consultation document on the future of the BBC, published in November 1992, invited views on a number of possible alternatives to the licence fee. The Government's conclusions will be set out in the White Paper that we plan to publish shortly.
:To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage what is the total licence revenue of the BBC arising from those purchasing licences in (a) England, (b) Northern Ireland, (c) Scotland and (d) Wales; and what proportion of the total income of the BBC is represented by revenue derived from television licences.
:BBC licence fee income for 1992–93 was £1,597.7 million. This represented 87 per cent. of total BBC income in 1992–93. Figures for television licence revenue by country are not available. However, the number of television licences in force by country as at 31 March 1993 was:
| Number | |
| England | 16,869,000 |
| Northern Ireland | 338,000 |
| Scotland | 1,724,000 |
| Wales | 1,066,000 |
:To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage what assessment has been made by his Department of the value for money provided by the BBC to its viewers, in relation to the cost of a television licence and to the services provided by other networks.
:We appointed independent consultants, Touche Ross, in mid-1993 to advise on the level of the television licence fee from 1994–96. The study, as well as examining the BBC's progress in pursuing efficiency measures, included comparisons of the BBC's performance and staff costs with those of commercial broadcasters. A copy of the management summary of the study is in the Library. I announced the Government's decision on the future level of the licence fee on 4 November 1993 at columns 309–10.
Yorkshire Mining Museum
:To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage if he will make a statement on the future of the Yorkshire Mining museum, Caphouse.
[holding answer 27 June 1994]: I visited the Yorkshire mining museum on Friday 10 December. I was very impressed by what I saw. The chairman of the trustees, Councillor Norman Hartshorne, the then vice-chairman, Councillor Robert Mitchell, and the director of the museum, Dr. Margaret Faull, explained to me the financial difficulties which the museum would face, following the restructuring of the coal industry. These difficulties arose mainly from the fact that the traditional help in kind to the museum from British Coal would no longer be available. I said that I would do everything I properly could, consistent with the DNH's relationship with other museums, to help.The Government have now decided that the Department of National Heritage will receive additional provision in order to give the Yorkshire mining museum, the only mining museum in England with underground workings, transitional assistance of £300,000, spread over three years. The Museums and Galleries Commission has agreed to administer the provision of this financial assistance. My officials will shortly be discussing with the commission the arrangements for doing this.I shall be looking for further, non-financial ways to help ensure the profitable continuance of the Yorkshire mining museum—although I emphasise that the future of the Yorkshire mining museum is for its trustees to determine. I wrote on Friday 24 June to the director of the museum suggesting an early meeting to discuss such matters. In the meantime, I have asked Sir Neil Cossons, director of the National Museum of Science and Industry, if he would be prepared to give the Yorkshire mining museum his advice on a wide range of relevant subjects, including sponsorship. He has generously agreed.The future of the mining museums, so central to the history of Britain's industrial development, and thus to her wealth, and to her role and influence in the rest of the world, will be one of the subjects to which I want to pay particular attention in the review that my Department is undertaking of our policy towards the whole museum sector.I should like to thank my hon. Friend, the Member for Batley and Spen (Mrs. Peacock) my hon. Friend the Member for Harrogate (Mr. Banks), the hon. Member for Wakefield (Mr. Hinchliffe) and the hon. Member for Morley and Leeds, South (Mr. Gunnell) among others on both sides of the House, for their valuable advice.
Attorney-General
Accountancy Firms
To ask the Attorney-General how many contracts and for what total sum were let out by his Department and agencies for which it is responsible to (a) Coopers and Lybrand, (b) KPMG Peat Marwick, (c) Ernst and Young, (d) Price Waterhouse, (e) Arthur Andersen, (f) Touch Ross, (g) Grant Thornton, (h) Robson Rhodes and (i) Pannell Kerr Forster for (i) privatisation, (ii) market testing, (iii) management advise, (iv) accounting, (v) audit, (vi) consultancy and (vii) other services in (1) 1980 to 1983, (2) 1984 to 1987, (3) 1988 to 1991 and (4) 1992–93.
The information is given in the table:
£ thousands
| ||||
Sums1/Contracts3 Firms3
| 1980–83
| 1984–87
| 1988–925
| 1992–93
|
| Coopers & Lybrand | ||||
| (vii) | — | — | 1,374 (4) | 2,233 (2) |
| KPMG Peat Marwick | ||||
| (vi) | — | — | 1004 (1) | — |
| (vii) | — | — | 1,397 (4) | 2,431 (0) |
| Ernst & Young | ||||
| (vii) | — | — | 963 (7) | 250 (0) |
| Price Waterhouse | ||||
| (ii) | — | — | — | 5 (1) |
| (vii) | — | — | 1,528 (5) | 264 (0) |
| Arthur Andersen | ||||
| (vii) | — | — | 96 (1) | — |
| Touche Ross | ||||
| (vi) | — | — | 9 (1) | 5 (1) |
| (vii) | — | — | 426 (4) | 11 (0) |
| Grant Thornton | ||||
| (vii) | — | — | 1,072 (5) | 109 (0) |
| Robson Rhodes | ||||
| (vii) | — | — | 146 82) | 5 (0) |
| Pannell Kerr Forster | — | — | — | — |
1The sums of money are the amounts spent on contracts, both new and continuing, during the financial years covered by the period. | ||||
2The figures in brackets are the number of new contracts let during the financial years covered by the period. | ||||
3Includes predecessor firms. | ||||
4Estimate. | ||||
531 March 1992. | ||||
Environment
Recycling
2.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what progress has been made towards the Government's target of recycling 25 per cent. of reusable household waste.
Recovery of household waste will increase dramatically as a result of the producer responsibility challenges which we have set for the packaging and newsprint industries and others.Packaging alone is over 20 per cent. of household waste and the industry draft plan aims to recover 58 per cent. of packaging waste by 2000 and to extend close-to-home recycling facilities to eight out of 10 homes.
19.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what steps he has taken to encourage recycling.
Our policy is to help promote recycling through a wide range of measures including the recent producer responsibility initiative, which means that those who make and sell products and packaging should take a share of responsibility for the beneficial re-use of their waste. Current producer responsibility initiatives cover packaging, newspapers, batteries, tyres, vehicles and electronic equipment.
Water Metering
9.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what discussions he has had with the chairmen of the main water companies about the introduction of compulsory water metering for domestic households.
The Secretary of State has discussions with the chairmen of water companies from time to time. Alternative methods of charging to replace rateable values are sometimes discussed. It is for each company to decide on an appropriate basis for charging, but metering, which relates charges to consumption, has many advantages.
Wildlife Sites
15.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what statutory protection there is for important wildlife sites that do not qualify as sites of special scientific interest.
The Government encourage local authorities to make full use of their powers under section 21 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. They should also adopt appropriate policies in their development plans and under planning legislation to protect such sites.
Local Government Finance
16.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what plans he has to revise future revenue support grant allocations to local authorities, so as to improve the sums granted to councils in Devon and Cornwall relative to those in the south east of England.
We are discussing with the local authority associations a number of possible changes in the allocation of revenue support grant.
33.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what plans he has to increase the local government support grant for urban authorities for 1995–96.
We are discussing with the local authority associations a number of possible changes in the allocation of revenue support grant.
24.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the funding of local services on Merseyside.
:I have nothing to add to the full reply I gave in response to the hon. Member's Adjournment debate on 26 May 1994, Official Report, columns 430–38.
Water Quality
17.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what steps he is taking to ensure that the Mediterranean countries are enforcing EC directives on water quality at the same speed and in same way as in Britain; and if he will make a statement about cross-border enforcement.
It is for the EC Commission to take the initiative to ensure implementation of directives and relevant international conventions to which the Community is signatory. The United Kingdom Government have continued to press for effective and consistent enforcement of directives, and the Commission now makes annual reports on implementation to the Environment Council.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, pursuant to his answer of 17 May, Official Report, column 393, what requirements of the Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 1989 concern product specifications for sewerage pipe.
None: the 1989 regulations are concerned only with the quality of water delivered to the customer.
Countryside Commission
18.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what assessments he has made of the advantages and disadvantages of merging the Countryside Commission and English Nature.
An announcement will be made once my right hon. Friend has had an opportunity to consider the report on the results of the merger study.
Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant
20.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what recent representatives he has received from British or foreign non-governmental organisations concerning the posing of environmental risks by the THORP.
No representatives, but a number of representations have been received on this subject.
Local Government Reorganisation
21.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what representations he has received from hon. Members for Warwickshire constituencies about local government reorganisation in the county.
:Since the announcement of the acceleration of the Local Government Commission's reviews on 30 September, Ministers in the Department have received the following letters from hon. Members in Warwickshire specifically on local government structure in the county :
- Alan Howarth—5 November 1993 and 17 May 1994
- Mike O'Brien—12 October 1993
- James Pawsey—5 October 1993 and 31 May 1994
- Sir Dudley Smith—15 October 1993
Nature Conservation Committee
22.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when he last met the chairman of the Joint Nature Conservation Committee to discuss its annual budget.
My predecessor, the hon. Member for Suffolk, South (Mr. Yeo), met the chairman of the Joint Nature Conservation Committee last July to discuss a range of topics including the committee's priorities and budget. I will be holding a similar meeting with the Earl of Selborne before the summer recess.
Local Government Electors
23.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the average number of electors per councillor in (a) metropolitan districts, (b) London boroughs and (c) shire districts, including county councillors.
:The number of councillors on each council in England is not prescribed in primary legislation but has been determined, by order, for individual authorities on the basis of recommendations from the Local Government Boundary Commission.The LGBC did however establish an average ratio of councillors to electorate to act as a guideline in drawing up its recommendations. The average number of electors per councillor used by the LGBC was:
| Number | |
| Metropolitan districts | 4,540 |
| London Boroughs | 4,530 |
| Shire Counties | 9,280 |
| Shire districts | 2,140 |
Local Government Review
25.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on the progress of consulting on and implementing the recommendations of the Local Government Commission.
I refer my hon. Friend to the answer given earlier today to the hon. Member for Darlington (Mr. Milburn).
26.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is his latest estimate of the cost (a) to central Government and (b) to local government of the local government review.
:The Local Government Commission incurred expenditure of £2·056 million in 1992–93 and received grant in aid of £5·124 million in 1993–94.We do not have overall figures for the expenditure incurred indirectly by central Government, or directly by local authorities, on the local government review.
Air Quality
27.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what new targets he proposes to set following the report in February by the expert panel on air quality standards and benzene.
I hope to make a statement on future air quality standards for benzene in the autumn, when we have completed consideration of responses to our recent consultation paper, "Improving Air Quality".
31.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he intends to announce new initiatives to improve air quality in British cities.
We published wide-ranging consultation proposals on the further improvement of air quality in March. We will announce our conclusions on the next steps later in the year when we have considered responses to the consultation.
Beaches
28.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how many British beaches now comply with EC pollution standards; and by what date he estimates all British beaches will do so.
A total of 365 or 80 per cent. of United Kingdom bathing waters, complied with the relevant standards of the EC directive over the 1993 bathing season. The substantial programme of improvements to noncompliant waters is designed to bring virtually all the waters up to standard for the 1996 season.
Car Parking, Plymouth
29.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what plans he has to investigate the use by Plymouth city council of its car parking revenue account.
This is not a matter for the Government, and I have no such plans. If there are allegations of impropriety or illegality they should be referred to the independent auditor appointed to audit the city council's accounts.
Housing, Basildon
32.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement about the condition of the housing stock in Basildon.
We are aware that there are problems of poor design and construction in some of Basildon's housing, in particular that built by the former new town development corporation. Very substantial resources are being invested in renovation or redevelopment, with help from the Estate Action and Housing Partnership programmes and under the terms of transfer of the new town housing.
Disabled People (Council Tax)
34.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement about exemption from the council tax for disabled people.
There is no exemption for disabled people from the council tax. However, people who are severely mentally impaired are not counted in the personal element of the tax and their presence will not add to the household's bill. Disabled persons may be entitled to a one band reduction in council tax if they need extra rooms or more space as a result of their special needs than would otherwise be the case.
Opencast Mining
35.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what proposals he has to reform planning law on opencast mining.
Opencast coal mining is subject to the same planning law that applies to all mineral extraction. However, my Department has recently completed public consultation on draft revised planning guidelines for coal extraction and colliery spoil disposal which set tough environmental tests. New guidance will be published as soon as possible.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what are the latest available figures for levels of extraction of opencast coal.
:According to statistics compiled by the County Planning Officers' Society, 10·07 million tonnes of opencast coal were produced in England during the period 1 April 1992 to 31 March 1993. The equivalent figures for Scotland and Wales are 5·4 million tonnes and 2·38 million tonnes.
Rough Sleepers
36.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what plans he has to deal with the special housing needs of those people sleeping in the Bullring at Waterloo.
The Bullring at Waterloo is one of five areas specifically targeted under the Government's £180 million rough sleepers initiative in central London. A consortium of statutory and voluntary agencies, chaired by the London borough of Lambeth, is co-ordinating activity in the area. The Government are funding voluntary sector outreach and resettlement workers to assess the needs of the individuals sleeping rough in the Bullring and to assist them into suitable accommodation.
Ec Directives
37.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment which EC directives on environmental matters have yet to be fully incorporated into United Kingdom law.
The main environmental directives still to be legally transposed in the United Kingdom are the nitrates directive, the urban waste water treatment directive and the habitats directive. The steps necessary to give effect to these are well in hand.
Single Regeneration Budget
38.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the total amount of unallocated funds for 1995–96 under the single regeneration budget.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State gave to the hon. Member for Leicester, East (Mr. Vaz) on 14 April 1994 at column 239
Local Government Commission
39.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when he last met the chairman of the Local Government Commission to evaluate the commission's work.
My right hon. Friend last met Sir John Banham on 18 January. I met Sir John on 13 June.
National Parks
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, when he will bring forward proposals to implement changes in the administration of national parks.
The Local Government (Wales) Bill will allow my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Wales, to establish joint or special planning boards for the three national parks in Wales. However, it is our intention to introduce legislation to establish independent authorities for all 10 national parks in England and Wales as soon as there is a suitable opportunity to do so.
Water And Sewerage Companies
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what responsibilities the Director General of Ofwat has for monetary arrangements for the certification of products used by water and sewerage companies.
:None.
Radioactive Waste
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when he received the 14th annual report from his Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee; and what response he plans to make to the recommendations made by Professor Knill's committee.
The Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee's 14th annual report was sent to my right hon. Friend on 17 June. We will respond to it in due course.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will request the chairman of British Nuclear Fuels to make available to hon. Members copies of the BNFL submissions to the Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee on the matter of nuclear waste substitution options for foreign reprocessing waste arisings, since his deposition before Parliament on 25 June last year of his correspondence with the chairman of RWMAC on the matter.
As we have not yet received the Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee's further advice on waste substitution, I am unable to consider this request.
Elderly People (Housing)
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when he received the final draft of the Ernst and Young study into the housing needs of the elderly; what was the final cost of the study; when the report will be placed in the Library; what conclusions he has drawn from the report; and if he will make a statement.
My Department received a full set of interim reports on the 12 individual parts of the study in February 1994. We expect to publish a single report, summarising these findings, in the autumn. A copy will be placed in the Library.I announced some interim findings from the research at a conference on affordable housing and community care organised by Hertfordshire county council earlier this year. A key finding is that the vast majority of elderly people wish to remain in their present homes, confirming the Government's community care policies. The study also suggests there is currently an over-provision of ordinary sheltered housing with warden support only, but under-provision of very sheltered housing with extra care facilities. We will consider carefully the policy implications of these and other findings from the study.
Following a competitive tender, the research contract was let to Ernst and Young and its sub-contractor, 140R1, at a cost of £956,000.
European Structural Funds
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will ensure that appropriate technical assistance is made available for applications under objectives 2 and 5 (b) of European structural funds.
Technical assistance grants are available only from within the United Kingdom's structural funds allocation. If any such grants are made, the amount left for projects is correspondingly smaller. Therefore, the Government consider that the funds should be used primarily for projects, and have sought to minimise the use of technical assistance.Normal practice should be that applicants bear the cost of making applications themselves. This ensures equity between applicants and it is a sound principle that applicant bodies should pay for their own administration.As in all other fields, Government Departments and offices will gladly assist those who may have difficulty in completing applications. However, it is recognised that there may be some organisations, especially in the voluntary sector, who may need extra help. Limited technical assistance may exceptionally be made available to support recognised bodies in bringing forward high quality applications.
Waste Management
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what contracts for refuse collection, cleansing waste management and waste control have been awarded by local authorities to (a) UK Waste Management Ltd., (b) the FOCSA and (c) Leigh; and what is the total value in each case.
:My right hon. Friend does not require local authorities to inform him to whom contracts are awarded, unless such information is requested in connection with his responsibility for investigating potential breaches of the compulsory competitive tendering legislation. The Department does not therefore maintain a comprehensive record of either the number or value of contracts awarded to specific private sector contractors.
Homelessness
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is her estimate of the cost of providing public housing or other publicly-funded residential care for people who are homeless in England; and if he will make a statement.
In 1992–93 40 per cent. of new tenancies in local authority and housing association stock were allocated to households whom local authorities accepted as homeless under part III of the Housing Act 1985. Over the three years 1992–93 to 1994–95 the Government are spending £5½ billion on providing an estimated 179,000 housing association homes to meet a range of housing needs.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what figures he has for homelessness in 1992 and 1993; and what were the comparable figures at the most recent available date.
:The number of households accepted as homeless by local authorities in England in 1993 was an estimated 134,190, a reduction of some 8,700-6.1 per cent.—on the corresponding figure in 1992 of 142,890 acceptances.The latest available figures show a continuation of the downward trend with 131,790 acceptances in the year ending March 1994. This is the eighth successive quarter in which total acceptances in the preceding 12 months have fallen.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what level of resources his Department provides to housing associations for helping homeless people.
:My Department provides funding through the Housing Corporation's approved development programme for housing associations to provide homes for homeless people and others in housing need. In 1994–95 the Housing Corporation's ADP budget is some £1·5 billion and the corporation estimates that this will enable housing associations to provide some 58,300 new lettings of which nearly 38,000—some 65 per cent—are intended by associations to be for homeless people. This would bring the total number of homes provided by housing associations between 1992–93 and 1994–95 to some 178,000. In addition the Department provides revenue support through the Housing Corporation for housing association schemes which provide accommodation for people with special needs, many of whom are single and homeless. In 1994–95 the corporation's revenue contributions are expected to be some £128 million.Under the Government's six-year—1990–91 to 1995–96—rough sleepers initiative, funding of £182 million has been made available to provide emergency shelters, night shelters, hostels, properties leased from private sector landlords and at least 3,300 bedspaces in permanent move-on accommodation for people who would otherwise sleep rough in central London. The bulk of this funding has been made available to housing associations through the Housing Corporation.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what plans he has to meet housing associations and local authorities to co-ordinate a strategy for helping homeless people.
:My right hon. Friend hopes to announce shortly the Government's conclusions following consideration of the responses to our consultation paper "Access to Local Authority and Housing Association Tenancies", which proposed a new approach to homelessness. We should then be happy to discuss our intentions with local authority and housing association representatives.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when he last met housing associations to discuss homelessness.
Ministers and officials in the Department are in frequent contact with the National Federation of Housing Associations, and with individual housing associations, about a range of topics, including homelessness. My officials met representatives of the National Federation of Housing Associations on 6 June to discuss the Government's proposals to reform the homelessness legislation.
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what recent figures he has for the numbers of people (a) living in hostels, (b) living in hotels provided at the expense of local authorities and (c) living in housing association dwellings.
:The latest available figures are for 31 March 1994 and these show that of the households for which local authorities in England had accepted responsibility to secure permanent accommodation, or who were awaiting the outcome of inquiries, some 10,670 households were living in hostels and 4,930 in bed-and-breakfast hotels.The latest available information on housing association dwellings relates to 31 March 1993 when a total of 686,700 households were in occupation.
Housing
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what recent requests for resources he has had (a) from housing associations and (b) from organisations such as Coventry Cyrenians.
My Department has received no recent requests for resources from individual housing associations. The distribution of the resources made available to registered housing associations for the provision of social housing, through the Housing Corporation's approved development programme, is informed by the housing needs index and local authorities' priority housing needs.My Department received 270 applications for grant under section 73 of the Housing Act 1985 for 1994–95 from voluntary sector organisations, including two from Coventry Cyrenians for schemes to assist single people in housing need.
Habitats Directive
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what discussions he has had with other Departments about the impact of the EU habitats directive; and if he will make a statement.
My Government colleagues and I are collectively committed to the transposition of the directive into United Kingdom law. The draft implementing regulations are to be laid shortly. Government policy for achieving the aims of the directive in the United Kingdom is set out in the biodiversity action plan, published in January of this year. This sets out our strategy for nature conservation over the next 10 and 20 years.
Local Authority Leaseholds
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when he expects to publish his proposals to tackle the problems faced by local authority leaseholders.
I hope before the recess to lay an order introducing a scheme to help council leaseholders needing to move but unable to sell their flats bought under the right to buy because of mortgageability problems. Where leaseholders can buy a more suitable home from their local authority, the scheme will allow the council to take back the present flat in exchange, and to offset the right-to-buy price paid for it against the sale price of the exchange property. We will also be releasing shortly a discussion paper covering this and a number of other measures to help council leaseholders.
Local Authority Housing
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, pursuant to his answer of 21 June, Official Report, column 100, what plans he has, apart from large-scale voluntary transfers, to introduce new initiatives or schemes designed to pass local authority housing stock to private sector interests; how many members of his or other Departments or offices are engaged in preparing policy papers on this matter; which of these options involve public subsidy; and if he will make a statement.
Besides large scale voluntary transfer—LSVT—there are several ways in which local authority housing may be trasnferred to alternative landlords. Tenants are able to choose a new landlord under tenant's choice. Local authorities can transfer properties as they become vacant through trickle transfer; or with tenant agreement they can undertake a partial LSVT.I am always keen to encourage local authorities to consider ways of increasing private investment in social housing. I answered the hon. Gentleman's question about staff numbers in my Department in my answer of 21 June. Officials in other Departments are involved as necessary. And, as I also said in my answer on 21 June, the Department is jointly funding a study with five urban authorities and the Housing Corporation to look into alternatives for the ownership and management of housing in urban and inner city areas. The study will consider the subsidy implications of these options, among other issues. It is due to report in the autumn.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is his Department's policy towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing.
Publication of such reports will be considered on a case-by-case basis, having regard to the code of practice on open government.
Labour Statistics
:To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what percentage of the work force in each local authority area in South Yorkshire is in part-time employment.
I have been asked to reply.The latest estimate from the labour force survey is that in South Yorkshire in Winter 1993–94 (December 1993—February 1994), 27 per cent. of those in employment were working part-time.Comparable information is not available for local authority areas.
Education
Under-Fives Provision
To ask the Secretary of State for Education what are the reasons for the different levels of funding between local authorities for provision for the under-fives.
It is for local authorities to determine their own priorities between and within services. The different levels of funding between local authorities on under-fives reflects those different priorities.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education if he will allow local education authorities to spend more on the under-fives.
Within general spending constraints, local authorities are free to determine their own expenditure on under-fives.
:To ask the Secretary of State for Education what are the criteria for establishing that a local education authority has underspent on the provision for the under-fives.
A notional allowance for under-fives provision is made in each authority's education standard spending assessment, based on its resident under-fives population. How local authorities use that notional allowance is a matter for the discretion of each local authority. Neither education SSAs nor the sub-blocks within them are spending targets.
:To ask the Secretary of State for Education if he will make it his policy to make the provision of funding for the under-fives dependent on the number of under-fives in school.
The level and nature of provision for under-fives is a matter for the discretion of each local education authority. A notional allowance to support such provision is made in each authority's education standard spending assessment, based on its resident under-fives population. There are no current proposals to change the basis, although standard spending assessments are reviewed each year.
Standard Spending Assessments
:To ask the Secretary of State for Education if it is his policy that the weighting factors in the standard spending assessments in respect of education are a reflection of his educational policies and priorities.
:No. Since education standard spending assessments are not prescriptive the weighting factors within them reflect the latest available objective information about relative variations in the cost incurred by local education authorities in providing a standard level of service.
:To ask the Secretary of State for Education what are the factors taken into account in setting the standard spending assessments for education spending.
Each local education authority's standard spending assessment is calculated on the basis of its relevant pupil and population numbers, adjusted to allow for local variations in the cost of providing a standard level of service. Adjustments are made to reflect the additional local costs of provision for pupils with additional educational needs, provision of education in sparsely populated areas, free school meals and the high labour and other costs in London and the south east.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Education if he will make a statement on the policy adopted by his Department towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing.
The Department considers publication of external consultants' reports on a case-by-case basis, having regard to the code of practice on access to government information. Factors taken into account include the need to protect private and sensitive commercial information relating to third parties.
:To ask the Secretary of State for Education if he will set out the total cost of external consultancy fees incurred by his Department in relation to market testing.
:Expenditure by the Department on consultancy fees in relation to market testing since September 1992 amounts to £296,210.
Teachers, Newham
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many teaching staff and non-teaching staff were employed by the Newham local education authority on (a) a full-time basis and (b) a part-time basis for each year since 1988.
:Information on the numbers of teaching and non-teaching staff is collected from local education authorities by the local government management board on behalf of the joint staffing watch group. The following data was supplied by the Newham education authority and shows the numbers of teaching staff and other education staff employed for the years 1988 to 1994. It is not possible to separate these between staff employed in schools and those employed elsewhere.
| Teachers and lecturers | Education—Other | |||
| March | Full-time | Part-time | Full-time | Part-time |
| 1988 | 2,697 | 338 | 1,146 | 1,866 |
| 1989 | 2,462 | 265 | 1,288 | 1,961 |
| 1990 | 2,500 | 677 | 1,404 | 1,218 |
| 1991 | 2,422 | 1,041 | 979 | 1,057 |
| 1992 | 2,342 | 575 | 994 | 1,026 |
| 1993 | 2,288 | 198 | 855 | 853 |
| 1994 | 2,043 | 157 | 805 | 867 |
Notes:
1. The table covers all staff in the LEA maintained nursery, primary and secondary schools, special and further education sectors and central administration. Staff employed by self-governing—GM—schools are not included. The 1994 figures exclude colleges which transferred to the new FE sector in April 1993.
2. "Education—other" includes educational support, clerical, school meals and premises related staff employed in schools and colleges, together with central services and administration within the education service.
Student Loans
To ask the Secretary of State for Education how frequently he meets the management of the body running the student loan scheme.
On my right hon. Friend's behalf, I have met members of the board and management of the Student Loans Company on a number of occasions.
Mature Students
:To ask the Secretary of State for Education how many students aged 50 years or over have enrolled on full-time higher education courses in each of the last five years.
[holding answer 27 June 1994]: The numbers of United K ingdom domiciled new entrant higher education students in England aged 50 or over studying undergraduate courses for the past five years are set out in the table.
| Year | Number |
| 1988–89 | 1,184 |
| 1989–90 | 1,019 |
| 1990–91 | 1,321 |
| 1991–92 | 1,521 |
| 1992–93 | 2,440 |
Social Security
National Insurance Numbers
:To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is the procedure by which a young person under the age of 16 years would be issued with a national insurance number.
The administration of the issue of national insurance numbers is a matter for Miss Ann Chant, the chief executive of the Contributions Agency. She will write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Ann Chant to Mr. Jeff Rooker, dated 28 June 1994:
As Chief Executive of the Contributions Agency I am responsible for answering questions about relevant operational matters. I have been asked to reply to your question about the procedure by which a young person under the age of 16 years would be issued with a National Insurance number (NINO).
The Agency has an automatic system which is designed to provide young people with details of their NINO before they reach age 16. The system uses the information held on the Department's Child Benefit computer records and most young people whose parents are in receipt of Child Benefit are identified when they are between the ages of 15 years 2 months and 15 years 8 months. Just before their 16th birthday a plastic NI number card containing details of their name and NINO is issued to the young person. If the parent or guardian has a different surname from the young person, they are asked to confirm the name which is to appear on the NI number card before it is issued.
As Child Benefit is not generally paid for young people in the care of local government authorities, an arrangement exists whereby the young person's social worker can ask for a NI number card to be issued. This voluntary agreement avoids the need for the young person to attend a social security office in person.
Special arrangements are also in place for children of Her Majesty's Forces personnel serving abroad. As the payment of Child Benefit is usually undertaken by the employing service/department no record of the young person is held on the Child Benefit computer record. The young person's boarding school or their parents can therefore complete a form asking for their NI number card to be issued. The form is passed to the Agency via the relevant unit paymaster. Anyone who does not receive NI number cards in one of these ways must apply, in person, to their local social security office for a NINO on or after their 16th birthday.
I hope that this information will prove useful.
Pensions Watchdog
:To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what action he is taking in respect of proposals by the Institute of Chartered Accountants on the power of his proposed pensions watchdog; and if he will make a statement.
We welcome the institute's comments which have been taken into account in our proposals for a new occupational pensions regulatory authority, set out in the White Paper "Security, Equality, Choice: The Future for Pensions". We will be consulting further with the institute and other interested parties in developing the new regulatory framework for occupational pension schemes.
Child Support Agency
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) when his Department received the letter from the hon. Member for Ilford, South sent to him on 28 March concerning the length of time taken by the Child Support Agency to respond to representations from hon. Members; when he replied to it; when it was forwarded to the Child Support Agency ; and when the chief executive of the Child Support Agency replied to it;(2) when he will reply to the letter sent to him by the hon. Member for Ilford, South on 28 March;(3) if he will publish the text of the reply dated 20 June from the chief executive of the Child Support Agency in response to the letter of 28 March from the hon. Member for Ilford, South to him.
My right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State received the letter on 31 March. As the letter concerned the operations of the Child Support Agency, it was transferred to the agency on 13 April for reply by the chief executive. I wrote to the hon. Member on 5 May to acknowledge receipt of his letter, and confirming the transfer of the letter to the chief executive. I understand that the chief executive replied on 20 June as follows:
"Thank you for your letter of 28 March to Peter Lilley who has asked me to reply. I am sorry for the delay in making my reply.
All letters from Members of Parliament addressed to me are acknowledged and I aim to respond within an average of 20 working days. Recent press interest has stimulated a great deal of correspondence from constituents and although that target is not being met at the moment, the necessary steps are being taken to ensure that correspondence from Members will be answered as soon as possible.
I hope my letter explains the posiition."
:To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what assessment he has made of the length of time taken by the Child Support Agency to reply to letters from hon. Members; and if he will make a statement;(2) what guidelines have been issued to the Child Support Agency as to the time scale for replying to letters from hon. Members; and in what percentage of cases the Child Support Agency has met those guidelines.
The Child Support Agency has a target to reply in full to a letter from an hon. Member within an average of 20 working days.I recognise that the target has been met only in some 13 per cent. of cases and unacceptable delays have occurred. The agency has taken a number of measures to improve performance in this area. These include additional staff resources and improved processing arrangements.
:To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security whether it is his policy to refer all letters from hon. Members concerning delay in replying to letters by the Child Support Agency for reply by the Child Support Agency itself.
Ministers see all correspondence from hon. Members relating to social security matters. However, where queries relate to operational matters dealt with by executive agencies, including the Child Support Agency, Ministers may refer them to the appropriate chief executive to reply. The chief executive has responsibility for operational issues and it is for the authority to take remedial action where necessary.
Social Security Appeal Tribunal
:To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what are the grounds for the Benefits Agency to appeal against a decision of the social security appeal tribunal to the Social Security Commissioner; and how long, on average, this process takes from the date of the appeal tribunal's decision.
Appeals against a decision of a social security appeal tribunal are made by adjudication officers based at the central adjudication services. An appeal can be made only on the basis of a point of law. It is not possible to provide the information on how long this process takes as figures do not distinguish between appeals by adjudication officers and others.
:To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how long, on average, appeals to the social security appeal tribunal take to be heard from the dale they are lodged.
:The average length of time from lodgement of appeal to the date of hearing before a social security appeal tribunal in the quarter ending December 1993 was 28·4 weeks.
Income Support
:To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what mechanisms there are for providing temporary financial support to those engaged in the social security appeals procedure over their entitlement to income support.
Where it is thought a person is, or may be entitled to benefit, payments on account of that benefit may be made until the appeal has been decided. Possible hardship to the claimant would be considered where my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State, is considering suspension of an appeal tribunal award whilst an appeal to the commissioner is awaiting hearing. Social fund crisis loans may also be available.
Vaccine-Damaged Children
:To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is his estimate of the number of surviving children suffering from vaccine damage as defined by the Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979; and how much each child has received under the Act.
Since follow-up records are not kept after a vaccine-damage payment has been made, no information is available as to the numbers of surviving vaccine-damaged children.
Black Postcards
To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many black postcards were received at 10 Downing Street on and after 16 June.
Eight thousand, five hundred and fifteen postcards have been received since 16 June.
Market Testing
:To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is his Department's policy towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing.
:External consultants are engaged by the Department to support in-house teams in constructing their bids and to advise and support client side teams in devising contract strategies. Reports are therefore commercial in confidence and not for publication.
:To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will set out the total cost of external consultancy fees incurred by his Department in relation to market testing.
The information is as follows:
| Year | £ |
| 1992–93 | 1,400,094 |
| 1993–94 | 4,261,909 |
Campaigns
:To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what limitations are placed on political campaigning by individuals employed by his Department; and if he will make a statement.
[pursuant to his reply, 14 June 1994, columns 362–63]: The information provided contained a typing error. The restrictions described in the second paragraph apply to higher executive officers (D), not higher executive officers.
Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs
Palestine
:To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what information he has on agreements made between the Palestinian water authority and the settler community about the fair use of water.
The Gaza-Jericho agreement provides for the Palestinian authority to manage water, with the exception of that for settlements and military installations. This will continue to be managed by Merekoth Water Company, in accordance with existing quantities of drinking water and agricultural water. Israel and the Palestinians are also to establish a subcommittee to deal with this issue.
Hebron (International Presence)
:To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what reports he has received from the temporary international presence in Hebron; and whether the representatives have been given full co-operation by both the Israeli and Palestinian authorities.
Our Consulate-General in Jerusalem is in touch with the officer in charge of the temporary international presence in Hebron. It has built up a working relationship with both parties, including regular meetings.
Macedonia
:To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what change there has been recently in the level of Serb military activity on the border with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and what has been the response of the United Nations.
:We understand that the Yugoslav army has established an observation post in an area where the border between Serbia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is not clearly defined. The United Nations does not regard this as a serious incident and has not alerted member states to any significant change in the pattern of military activity along the border between the two states. UNPROFOR continues to monitor the situation.
Peacekeeping Operations
:To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much in cash terms and constant prices the Government spent in 1980, 1990, 1991 and 1992 on peace operations in developing countries, involving British military personnel.
British military personnel were not involved in any peacekeeping operations in 1980.The MOD costs for British military personnel participating in peacekeeping operations in developing countries for 1990, 1991 and 1992 were as follows—constant prices in brackets.
| 1990 | 1991 (£ million) | 1992 (£ million) | |
| MINURSO | 0·06 | 0·61 | |
| (Western Sahara) | (0·07) | (0·66) | |
| UNIKOM | 0·03 | 0·82 | |
| (Iraq/Kuwait) | (0·03) | (0·88) | |
| UNAMIC/UNTAC | 0·01 | 0·83 | |
| (Cambodia) | (0·01) | (0·89) | |
| MFO Sinai | 0·08 | 0·09 | 0·04 |
| (Multinational Observer Force) | 0·09 | (0·10) | (0·04 |
| Iraq: | |||
| Safe Haven | 11·25 | ||
| (12·54) |
1990
| 1991 (£ million)
| 1992 (£ million)
| |
| Warden | 2·59 | 4·21 | |
| (2·89) | (4·52) | ||
| Jural | 5·28 | ||
| (5·67) | |||
| Total | 0·08 | 14·03 | 11·79 |
| (0·09) | (15·64) | (12·66) |
In addition, the United Kingdom assessed shares of the United Nations budgets for the peacekeeping operations were as follows:
1991(US$)
| 1992(US$)
| |
| MINURSO | 8,265,226 | Nil assesment (costs taken from existing funds) |
| UNIKOM | 3,542,240 | 3,651,915 |
| UNAMIC/ | — | 2,010,720 |
| UNTAC | — | 48,813,331 |
| Total | 11,807,466 | 50,824,051 |
Note:—Cyprus and the former Yugoslavia have not been classified here as "developing countries".
Public Bodies
:To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (1) if he will list the advisory non-departmental public bodies sponsored by his Department which are required to lay their annual reports before Parliament;(2) if he will list those of his Department's advisory non-departmental public bodies which the Government are required to consult prior to legislation proposals; and in respect of which bodies the Government must publish their response to advice supplied by them;(3) if he will list his Department's advisory non-departmental public bodies which are required to produce annual reports;(4) if he will list his Department's advisory non-departmental public bodies which are required to publish their advice to Government;(5) if he will list the advisory bodies he has set up in his Department since the publication of "Public Bodies 1993";(6) if he will list the advisory non-departmental public bodies sponsored by his Department which have a statutory basis.
:None.
Information
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what consideration has been given by Her Majesty's Government to the request made on 6 June by the Financial Times to obtain details of decisions taken by qualified majority vote at the Foreign Affairs, Internal Market, Social Affairs and Agriculture Councils since 1989, submitted under the provisions of the EU code of conduct on public access to information.
The request by the Financial Times for information on voting records under the code of conduct on access to documents is being considered by the Council. The United Kingdom is arguing that the response to the Financial Times should be as helpful as possible.
North Korea
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he expects to respond to the letter on nuclear proliferation in North Korea and Trident submitted to him by the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent, Greenpeace and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament on 15 June; and if he will place a copy of his reply in the Library.
I wrote to the hon. Member for Blaenau Gwent on 24 June in response to his letter of 15 June. A copy of my reply has been placed in the Library of the House.
Kenya
:To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs to what extent British commercial interests have been affected by ethnic clashes in the Rift Valley in Kenya; and what representations he has made on this matter.
:Inter-ethnic fighting in Rift Valley province over the past two-and-a-half years has had limited effect on British commercial interests there. We have consistently made clear to the Kenyan Government over this period our concern at the political, economic and social dislocation caused by the fighting; and our view that it is the prime responsibility of every Government to provide security for their citizens, and to implement long term solutions.
Market Testing
:To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is his Department's policy towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing.
:The FCO's general policy is not to publish consultants' reports in relation to market testing but specific requests for information would be considered on merit in line with the Department's policy on open government.
:To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will set out the total cost of external consultancy fees incurred by his Department in relation to market testing.
The total costs are as follows:
| £ | |
| Financial year 1992–93 | 22,913 |
| Financial year 1993–94 | 129,553 |
| Total | 152,466 |
Castlemartin Army Range
:To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what was the purpose of the destruction of British tanks and armoured cars at Castlemartin army range on 20 to 25 June.
:A total of 37 tanks and 12 armoured combat vehicles were destroyed at the Castlemartin range in order to comply with the United Kingdom's obligations as a state party to the conventional armed forces in Europe treaty. The treaty, which all NATO and former Warsaw pact countries have ratified, is aimed at reducing the possibility of war in Europe and required signatories to reducing numbers of heavy weapons to much lower levels by the end of 1995. In total the United Kingdom is committed to destroying 183 tanks, 30 armoured combat vehicles and four combat helicopters. In comparison the Russian Federation, which has by far the largest reduction liability, will destroy over 3,000 tanks, 5,500 armoured cars, 660 pieces of artillery, 99 helicopters and more than 1,000 combat aircraft.
Arms Reduction
:To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what progress the former Warsaw pact countries are making in achieving the arms reduction targets set by the conventional armed forces in Europe treaty.
Under the terms of the treaty, NATO and the countries of the former Warsaw pact have from July 1992 until November 1995 to meet their reduction obligations. To date over 20,000 items have been destroyed, 65 per cent. of them by the former Warsaw pact countries, including 4,409 tanks; 5,970 armoured vehicles; 25 helicopters; 713 combat aircraft; and 2,166 pieces of artillery. The total reduction liability of these countries is twice that of NATO countries—a reflection of the former Warsaw pact's larger holdings of weapons.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what measures are being taken to ensure that former Warsaw pact countries are carrying out their obligations under the provisions of the conventional armed forces in Europe treaty.
Monitoring of compliance with the treaty's provisions is carried out by international challenge inspections. It is NATO policy to witness all destruction events carried out by former Warsaw pact countries. For the United Kingdom, this is conducted by the joint arms control implementation group—JACIG. Since the reduction period began in 1992, JACIG has led 46 missions to reduction sites in Eastern Europe and the countries of the former Soviet Union, where 67 per cent. of all destructions will take place. As a result of these and similar inspections carried out by other NATO countries we believe that all state parties are currently in compliance with their treaty obligations.
European Court Of Justice
:To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether, following the European Court of Justice's Surinder Singh judgment in July 1992, he will refund fees to those persons who have been eligible for gratis visas had the European Court of Justice ruling existed at the time the fees were paid.
Yes. My Department will consider written applications for a refund of fees from those non-European Union nationals who paid a fee before July 1992 for the visa granted them to enter the United Kingdom with their British citizen spouse who had been working in another member state of the European Union. The amount which may be refunded will be between £7 and £100 and be made up of the value of the fee plus an ex gratia sum in recognition of the time since the fee was paid. Applicants will be asked to provide evidence to support their claim.
Italy
:To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations he has made to the new Italian Government about their decision to subsidise steel plants in Brescia.
I have been asked to reply.I met the Italian Minister for Industry, Senor Gnutti on 6 June and reiterated the concerns of the United Kingdom Government and steel industry about the proposed aid to the Bresciani. The proposal was discussed at the Industry Council on 22 June, as I reported in my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Shoreham (Mr. Stephen) on 28 June,
Official Report, column 467.
Wales
Sites Of Special Scientific Interest
:To ask the Secretary of State for Wales, pursuant to his answer of 3 February, Official Report, column 866, how many more nature conservation orders he has granted or refused under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 in Wales; how many are still in force; and if he will make a statement.
:None. The two nature conservation orders reported in February are still in place.
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales, pursuant to his answer of 8 March, Official Report, column 153, how many further prosecutions have been taken under sections 28 or 29 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 in Wales; and if he will make a statement.
:None.
Assisted Area Grants
:To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many assisted area status grant applications from companies in Wales in each of the years since 1983 have translated into firm projects, with the numbers and amounts of the grants given and the number of jobs created; and if he will make a statement.
:The data are not available in the form requested. Information relating to regional assistance is published each year in the Industrial Development Act 1982 annual reports. Copies have been placed in the Library of the House.
Local Government Employees
:To ask the Secretary of State for Wales if he will publish for each district council, county council and for Wales as a whole, for the latest available date, the average earnings of local government employees.
:Information on the earnings of employees in local government is available from the "New Earnings Survey", a copy of which is in the Library of the House.
A55
:To ask the Secretary of State for Wales if he will review the provision of hard shoulder facilities on the A55 in Clwyd.
The A55 in Clwyd is an all-purpose dual two-lane trunk road which is not normally provided with hard shoulders. The operational characteristics of all trunk roads are kept under review and improvements are made only when justified.
:To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what assessment he has made of the emergency telephone provision on the A55 in Clwyd.
The emergency telephone assessment undertaken by the highways directorate of the Welsh Office highlighted the requirement for 19 emergency telephones on trunk roads within Clwyd. Ten of these are on the A55 and they will be the first to be installed under phase 1 of the contract, commencing in August 1994.The remaining nine installations will be undertaken during subsequent phases of the contract.
Public Bodies
:To ask the Secretary of State for Wales if he will make available the recommendations of the efficiency scrutiny of the sponsorship of non-departmental public bodies in Wales, and his response to them.
:I have today placed in the Library of the House a copy of the report's recommendations and my response, in the form of an action plan for their implementation.
Roads
:To ask the Secretary of State for Wales (1) what estimate he has made of the number of jobs currently created on road schemes in the Merthyr borough and Rhymney district; and how many of these are local employees;(2)what estimate he has made of the number of jobs created by his Department's current road schemes within each county of Wales; and what is his estimate of the number of Welsh employees on those schemes.
The information requested is not available.
Employment
Job Creation And Training Programmes
:To ask the Secretary of State for Employment what research he has commissioned examining the outcome and effectiveness in terms of jobs gained and qualifications awarded of each job creation and training programme run by his Department since 1979.
:Regular surveys have been carried out in connection with the main employment and training programmes run by my Department since 1979. These have provided information on the number of participants who have found jobs since leaving the programme and, where appropriate, on the numbers who have achieved a qualification. More detailed research has been carried out periodically to compare employment rates amongst ex-participants with those amongst a group of non-participants. The results of the current regular surveys for training for work and youth training are published each month in the Employment Gazette.
Television And Radio
:To ask the Secretary of State for Employment how many people there are employed in television and radio broadcasting in the United Kingdom; and how many of these are employed directly or indirectly by the BBC.
:The latest reliable information is from the 1991 census of employment. The most detailed data available covers radio and television services and theatres—code 9741 from the 1980 standard industrial classification. In September 1991, there were 75,800 jobs in this activity in the United Kingdom.The Statistics of Trade Act 1947 prohibits the disclosure of information about individual employers. I cannot, therefore provide the information requested about the BBC.
Training And Enterprise Councils
:To ask the Secretary of State for Employment what discussions he has had with his colleagues on increasing the funding of TECs.
:My right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State has discussed the funding of training and enterprise councils with Cabinet colleagues in the course of negotiations for the public expenditure survey.The amount of funding TECs will receive in 1995–96 will be announced following my right hon. Friend, the Chancellor of the Exchequer's unified Budget statement.
Market Testing
:To ask the Secretary of State for Employment if he will make a statement on the policy adopted by his Department towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing.
Consultants offer advice on operational aspects of market testing. This is commercially sensitive and is not published.
Treasury
Government Expenditure
:To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish a table indicating how much central Government expenditure was spent in (a) England, (b) Northern Ireland, (c) Scotland and (d) Wales for the most recent available year, both in total money terms and on expenditure per capita.
:The table shows central Government expenditure which can be identified from official records as having been incurred on behalf of the population of England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. The information given is consistent with that published in tables 7.6 A and B of "Public Expenditure, Statistical Supplement to the Financial Statement and Budget Report 1994–95" (Cm 2519).
| Central Government expenditure, 1992–93 | ||
| £ million | ||
| Cash | Per capita | |
| England | 104,678 | 2,171 |
| Scotland | 13,448 | 2,633 |
| Wales | 7,369 | 2,549 |
| Northern Ireland | 7,135 | 4,475 |
| United Kingdom | 132,630 | 2,295 |
Barclays Bank
:To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement following the United States Supreme Court decision on Barclays bank.
:My right hon. and learned Friend and I were naturally disappointed by the Supreme Court's decision on the Barclays case. The Government have always strongly opposed the imposition of world-wide unitary tax on United Kingdom-owned companies and supported Barclays throughout this litigation.As my right hon. and learned Friend said last September, the legislation passed by California to modify its tax law is a major step forward and it should ensure that in future no United Kingdom-owned company is exposed to damage there from the imposition of world-wide unitary tax. We will be following closely the detailed regulations and the practical implementation of this law. I share the concerns of British business that the details of the Californian legislation have not yet been fully implemented. Consequently, the United Kingdom will retain its retaliatory powers against the possibility that states might damage United Kingdom-owned companies at some time in the future.My right hon. and learned Friend and I also welcome the clear commitment to the internationally accepted arm's-length principle which has been shown by the Federal Administration. We regard such support for the international consensus as of major importance in expanding trade and investment throughout the world.
Accountancy Firms
:To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many contracts and for what total sum were let out by his Department and agencies for which it is responsible to (a) Coopers and Lybrand, (b) KPMG Peat Marwick, (c) Ernst and Young, (d) Price Waterhouse, (e) Arthur Andersen, (f) Touche Ross, (g) Grant Thornton, (h) Robson Rhodes and (i) Pannell Kerr Forster for (i) privatisation, (ii) market testing, (iii) management advice, (iv) accounting, (v) audit, (vi) consultancy and (vii) other services in (1) 1980 to 1983, (2) 1984 to 1987, (3) 1988 to 1991 and (4) 1992–93.
:The following table gives the total value and number of contracts let by HM Treasury for 1991–92 and 1992–93 for the subject headings and companies requested. In this period no contracts were awarded to Arthur Andersen, Grant Thornton, Robson Rhodes and Pannell Kerr Forster. I regret information going back beyond this date can be obtained only at disproportionate cost. The table is not specifically broken down by company, as information given to this detail would breach our commercial-in-confidence rules.
| 1991–92 | 1992–93 | |||
| Subject | Number of contracts | Value (£ thousand) | Number of contracts | Value (£ thousand) |
| Privatisation | 3 | 1,184 | 6 | 277 |
| Market-testing | 1 | 23 | 1 | 20 |
| Management advice | — | — | — | — |
| Accounting | — | — | — | — |
| Audit | — | — | 4 | 137 |
| Consultancy | 1 | 20 | — | — |
| Other services | — | — | 3 | 119 |
Training And Enterprise Councils
:To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on his involvement with TECs.
:My right hon. and learned Friend has no direct involvement with TECs. That is the responsibility of my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Employment.
Vat Office, Liverpool
:To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer by what amount, above projected costs, it has cost to construct the value added tax office in Liverpool; what occupancy was originally planned for the building; how many staff are actually based there; how many and which staff commute from London to work in the office; who pays their travel costs; what is the total; how long they have been sustained; and if he will make a statement.
:In October 1990 independent quantity surveyors estimated the construction costs of the VAT headquarters building in Liverpool at £25· 1 million. The estimate was based on a sketch design and was at October 1990 prices. This price excludes land, professional fees, fixtures and fittings, furniture and VAT.The main part of the final account for the construction has not yet been agreed by the contractor but the Department's project cost control quantity surveyors have prepared draft final accounts and advise that the construction costs will be within the estimate. Exact figures cannot, at this stage, be given for reasons of commercial confidentiality.The planned occupancy specified in the building brief prepared by Customs and Excise was 1,775.Currently there are 752 staff based in the building. A further 39 posts are scheduled to be relocated from Southend by December 1994, but much of the work involved will be absorbed by existing staff who would otherwise be surplus. Four hundred and ninety Customs regional HQ and operational staff will move into the building in September 1994. This creates a need to provide space for facilities for public callers, VAT traders and shipping agents from September 1994.The space not required by Customs has been re-allocated to the Charity Commission by Property Holdings, the managers of the Government's estate. The
Contracts let with the following companies: Coopers and Lybrand, KPMG Peat Marwick, Ernst and Young, Price Waterhouse and Touche Ross, during 1991–92 and 1992–93 were as follows:
Charity Commission intends to move 236 staff into the building in November 1994. There are no staff who commute from London to work in the office.
Market Testing
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his Department's policy towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing.
Reports by external consultants in relation to market testing constitute advice to the management of the Department and are not published.
:To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will set out the total cost of external consultancy fees incurred by his Department in relation to market testing.
:Expenditure by Her Majesty's Treasury to date on fees to external consultants for work related to market testing amounts to £136,461.
Exchange Rates
:To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what is the Government's objective in raising the real exchange rate against the ecu above the February 1993 level; and what assessment he has made of the effect this has had on (a) the profitability of manufacturing in the United Kingdom and (b) exports of manufactures to the EEC;(2) what was the nominal exchange rate against the ecu in
(a) August 1992, (b) February 1993 and (c) June 1994;
(3) what was the percentage increase in the nominal exchange rate against the ecu between February 1993 and January 1994; and what is his estimate of the effect of the increase on the volume of (a) imports and (b) exports of manufactures to the EC.
(4) what account the Government's policy on the rate of exchange against the ecu takes of the United Kingdom share of the market for manufactures in (a) the United Kingdom and (b) the EC.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 21 March 1994, Official Report, column 15, which provides a reference to data which can be used to calculate the sterling exchange rates and percentage change requested.In the same answer I also made a statement about the role of the exchange rate in monetary policy. The Government have no objective to raise sterling's real exchange rate against the ecu.
The exchange rate is only one factor affecting the volume of imports and exports. It is difficult to isolate the effect of changes in the exchange rate from that of other factors, such as relative prices and activity in the United Kingdom and its trading partners.
:To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the Government's policy on the rate of exchange of the pound sterling against the deutschmark.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 21 March 1994, Official Report, column 15.
Health
Prednisone
:To ask the Secretary of State for Health what specific guidelines and advice there are for patients concerning the prescription and the possible side effects of the synthetic corticosteroid Prednisone.
:It is important that patients taking corticosteroids do not abruptly stop taking the drug, as this may have serious consequences. This advice is provided to patients through steroid treatment cards which give clear guidance on the precautions to be taken. They also provide details of the prescriber, drug, dosage and duration of treatment. Steroid treatment cards are routinely given to patients taking systemic corticosteroids.Information and advice on possible side effects are also available in patient information leaflets. I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave the hon. Member for Bristol, South (Ms Primarolo) on 2 December,
Official Report, column 702. However, in the light of the recent recommendations of the Committee on Safety of Medicines regarding severe chickenpox in association with corticosteroids, I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave the hon. Member for Sheffield, Brightside (Mr. Blunkett) on 12 May, Official Report, columns 216–17, product information for corticosteroids is being revised. All pharmaceutical companies manufacturing systemically administered corticosteroids have been approached and asked to revise or introduce patient information leaflets without waiting until renewal of the product licences.
Accidental Overdosing
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many cases of accidental overdosing of prescribed medication were reported in 1993; and if she will make a statement.
The information is not available in the form requested.
Evening Primrose Oil
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what research her Department has funded into the efficacy of evening primrose oil as a treatment for arthritis; in what circumstances evening primrose oil is available on prescription; if her Department intends to fund further research into the value of evening primrose oil for treatment of illness and disease; and if she will make a statement.
The main agency through which the Government support biomedical and clinical research is the Medical Research Council, which receives its grant-in-aid from the office of my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. The MRC is always willing to consider soundly-based scientific proposals for research. Evening primrose oil is not available on prescription under the national health service.
Health Authority Funding
:To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans she has to devise a new national formula for allocating finance to district health authorities for hospital and community health services.
A review of the weighted capitation formula is taking place.
Organophosphorus Insecticides
:To ask the Secretary of State for Health what investigations and research her Department is carrying out in respect of organophosphorous chemicals used in sheep dips, and those used as insecticides that were sprayed on the British armed forces during the Gulf war; and if she will make a statement.
None. However, the Health and Safety Executive, which is the responsibility of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Employment, has two on-going research projects involving organophosphorus sheep dips.The Government receive independent scientific advice on the safety in use of sheep dips containing organophosphorus and other compounds from the Statutory Veterinary Products Committee. Following a review last year of the result of research they advised that organophosphorus sheep dips could continue to be marketed. In particular, they found no firm scientific evidence to support the association of chronic ill-health with exposure. Nevertheless, they recommended measures to reduce exposure to the dips and that further investigations be undertaken.Earlier this year, the medical and scientific panel was set up as a sub-committee of the Veterinary Products Committee to evaluate current research, advise on additional work, advise on the suitability of projects submitted, and to report to the Veterinary Products Committee.The medical effects of a large over-exposure to organophosphorus insecticides or sheep dips are well documented. Large over-exposures should not occur when the recommended precautions are taken.The suggestion that organophosphorus insecticides were sprayed on the British armed forces during the Gulf War is a matter for my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence.
Dreadnought Seamen's Hospital
:To ask the Secretary of State for Health what has been the total cost to date of maintaining the premises formerly occupied by the Dreadnought seamen's hospital in Greenwich, since they became vacant.
This is a matter for South Thames regional health authority. The hon. Member may wish to contact Mr. William Wells, the chairman of the authority, for details.
Health Needs
:To ask the Secretary of State for Health what consideration will be given in the future, for the Croydon health authority district, to health needs as reflected by (a) infant mortality, (b) life expectancy at birth, (c) the number and proportion of single unmarried mothers and (d) the needs of ethnic minority communities.
Croydon health authority, like all health authorities, is expected to plan to meet the health needs of all its residents. The hon. Member may wish to contact Adrienne Fresko, chairman of Croydon health authority, for details.
New Hospital Buildings
:To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the effects of capital financing charges on the ability of health care providers to invest in new hospital buildings.
The purpose of the capital charging system is to increase the awareness of health service managers of the cost of capital, to ensure that proposals for capital investment make best use of the resources available and to encourage both health care providers and purchasers to be innovative in planning health care delivery by considering alternatives to capital investment where appropriate. This has led to some providers reconsidering plans for new hospital buildings. There is no evidence that necessary capital investment is being constrained by the capital charging system.
Allergic Reactions To Medication
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many cases of death caused by an allergic reaction to prescribed medication were reported in 1993; and if she will make a statement.
Cause of death data are not yet available for 1993.
Private Patients
:To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what assessment she has made of whether, where NHS hospitals provide private treatment to patients, there is cross subsidy from NHS to private patients;(2) what assessment she has made of whether, where NHS hospitals offer private treatment to patients, the treatment is at full cost which includes overhead depreciation and profit.
Health authorities and national health service trusts are already aware that they are expected to calculate NHS private patient charges on a commercial basis. Such charges must not be less than the full cost to the health authority or NHS trust including overheads and capital charges and must not involve any cross subsidy from NHS to private patients. This generates valuable income for improving services for all patients.
Aortic Aneurysms
:To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many deaths were attributed to aortic aneurysms in each of the last five years; and if she will make a statement on the plans she has for screening programmes for this condition.
The table shows deaths from aortic aneurysms in England and Wales for the last five years for which such figures are available.
| Number | |
| 1988 | 7,914 |
| 1989 | 8,251 |
| 1990 | 8,463 |
| 1991 | 8,703 |
| 1992 | 8,992 |
Gamma Hydroxy Butyrat
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the effects of gamma hydroxy butyrate (a) when taken by people who have not been prescribed it and it and (b) when taken in quantity; what controls exist at present; and what controls she now intends to introduce on the availability of gamma hydroxy butyrate (i) other than by prescription and (ii) by mail order.
The substance known as gamma hydroxy butyrate has anaesthetic and muscle relaxant properties and is regarded as a medicinal product as defined in section 130 of the Medicines Act 1968. It can have serious adverse effects, among which are: vomiting, drowsiness, vertigo, depressed breathing and heart rate.Licences are required under the Medicines Act 1968 for the manufacture, sale or supply of this product. No such licences have been granted. Any person manufacturing, selling or supplying an unlicensed product is likely to be in breach of the Act and committing a criminal offence. Any breach of the Act is investigated by enforcement officers of the Medicines Control Agency. The existing controls in the Medicines Act are at present regarded as sufficient.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what is her Department's policy towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing.
The decision to disclose all or part of the information contained in external consultants' reports will be made on a case-by-case basis.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will set out the total cost of external consultancy fees incurred by her Department in relation to market testing.
Since publication of the White Paper, "Competing for Quality", in November 1991, the total cost of consultants employed in connection with market testing programmes of the Department and its agencies is as follows:
| £ | |
| April 1991 to March 1992 | 30,000 |
| April 1992 to March 1993 | 370,000 |
| April 1993 to March 1994 (latest figures held) | 580,000 |
Nurses, Midwives And Health Visitors
:To ask the Secretary of State for Health what representations she has received from registered nurses, midwives and health visitors in relation to the registrar of the United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting.
:None.
Nhs Trusts
:To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to her answer of 17 May, Official Report, column 417, regarding loans to national health service trusts, if she will itemise which trusts received loans or guarantees, and for what amount.
[holding answer 27 June 1994]: The information requested will be placed in the Library. The information is provided in tabular form and corrects that given on 17 May.Trusts borrow principally to support their capital investment activities and all the borrowing detailed was within agreed limits whether or not the trust met its financial duties. Trusts also negotiate overdraft facilities with their bankers and the Department issues guarantees in support of these arrangements.
Scotland
Scottish Homes
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) if he will make a statement on the progress of the plans of Scottish Homes to dispose of its landlord responsibility over housing stock with particular reference to Paisley, South;(2) when he last met the chairman of Scottish Homes to discuss the disposal of housing stock; what plans there are to dispose of high-rise property owned by Scottish Homes in the Paisley, South constituency; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend has no plans to meet the chairman of Scottish Homes to discuss the disposal of its housing stock but he has issued guidance to Scottish Homes on this matter, following which it published procedures for the disposal of its stock.In accordance with these procedures, Scottish Homes is preparing a local stock strategy in consultation with tenants and other interested parties, which will outline a time scale and provide a clear framework for the transfer of its stock, including high rise property, in the Renfrew district, which covers the Paisley, South constituency. It is expected that the strategy document will be published during July. Proposals to transfer must have the agreement of tenants after which they are subject to my right hon. Friend's approval.
Landlords (Neglect Of Property)
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what statutory and discretionary powers are available to local authorities to take action against owner-occupiers and private landlords who fail to keep their property in reasonable sanitary condition; what special powers are available when the condition of the property or grounds of the property deteriorate into a state which is likely to cause nuisance to neighbours, damage to adjacent property or is a potential threat to an otherwise safe and healthy environment; if he has any plans to bring forward measures to tighten control of such situations; and if he will make a statement.
:Local authorities may take action under the Public Health (Scotland) Act 1897, the Building (Scotland) Act 1959, the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 and the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987 to require the repair or up-grading of homes so that, for example, they have adequate sanitation. Powers relating to houses in multiple occupation are also contained in the 1987 Act. Specific powers are available for authorities to take action where neighbours are affected and there is provision to require the maintenance of private open spaces. There are no plans to amend those wide-ranging powers.
Defective Housing
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what advice he has given local authorities, housing associations and Scottish Homes on dealing with the structural defects of Orlit and Whitson-Fairhurst type houses; and if he will make a statement.
No such advice has been given by my Department. However, information about approved repair schemes for defective house types is available from PRC Homes Ltd. A different scheme is required for each house type and, for some types, repair is either impractical or is not cost-effective. There is no approved repair scheme for the Whitson-Fairhurst and Orlit house types in Scotland. Where such a scheme does not exist, the defect cannot be dealt with, although in many cases the houses will continue to provide satisfactory accommodation for many years yet.
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what plans he has to bring forward additional measures to facilitate and assist local authorities, Scottish Homes, housing associations, co-operatives and owner-occupiers to deal with the structural defects of Orlit and Whitsun-Fairhurst type houses.
No further measures are necessary. Local authorities and other housing agencies have been informed about defective house types, such as the Orlit and Whitson-Fairhurst, and how they may be dealt with. Resources totalling almost £426 million have been made available to local authorities for capital investment in public sector housing in 1994–95 and they are able to undertake work on defective housing in their own stock if they consider this to be a priority. Scottish Homes can also make similar provision. Local authorities who assist private owners eligible for repurchase of their home or reinstatement grant are given additional capital allocations which fully reflect the cost of that assistance.
Renfrew District Council
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish a table showing what the value of housing support grant to Renfrew district council would have been in each year since 1981, using the formulae applied in 1980–81 as a calculation index and uprating for inflation; what was actually paid to each local authority in each year of the same period; and if he will make a statement.
:The housing support grant entitlement of any individual local authority is the product of a complex series of calculations to determine the difference between estimated aggregate eligible expenditure and estimated aggregate relevant income for all appropriate local authorities and its apportionment among authorities on the basis of distribution formulae agreed with the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities.A re-calculation of the housing support grant entitlements of Renfrew district council since 1981 on the basis of the formulae which applied to the 1980–81 grant settlement could be carried out only at disproportionate cost.The actual grant entitlements of individual local authorities since 1980–81 are shown in the table. Over the period, it has been the Government's policy to move away from indiscriminate housing subsidies, such as housing support grant, in favour of targeting assistance on tenants in greatest need through the housing benefit system.
| Individual entitlements to Housing Support Grant | |
| Authority | 1980–81 |
| Berwickshire | 1,306,875 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 1,753,749 |
| Roxburgh | 1,971,598 |
| Tweeddale | 285,768 |
| Clackmannan | 1,818,745 |
| Falkirk | 7,479,143 |
| Stirling | 1,916,151 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,452,108 |
| Nithsdale | 905,200 |
| Stewartry | 676,321 |
| Wigtown | 1,154,830 |
| Dunfermline | 6,079,270 |
| Kirkcaldy | 6,500,216 |
| North East Fife | 1,664,141 |
| Aberdeen | 10,733,105 |
| Banff and Buchan | 5,495,862 |
| Gordon | 2,860,784 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 1,373,533 |
| Moray | 4,402,062 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 470,225 |
| Caithness | 1,044,456 |
| Inverness | 2,323,484 |
| Lochaber | 1,825,267 |
| Nairn | 351,660 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 4,249,933 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 343,792 |
| Sutherland | 729,163 |
| East Lothian | 5,062,507 |
| Edinburgh | 12,517,913 |
| Midlothian | 3,334,405 |
| West Lothian | 4,796,099 |
| Argyll and Bute | 3,565,946 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 458,385 |
| Clydebank | 4,032,786 |
| Clydesdale | 1,651,898 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 670,398 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 1,812,670 |
| Cunninghame | 4,656,897 |
| Dumbarton | 2,805,151 |
| East Kilbride | 340,284 |
| Eastwood | 303,824 |
| Glasgow | 49,487,984 |
| Hamilton | 5,015,434 |
| Inverclyde | 6,140,965 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 4,168,590 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 4,351,786 |
| Monklands | 4,359,605 |
| Motherwell | 8,193,225 |
| Renfrew | 6,571,032 |
Authority
| 1980–81
|
| Strathkelvin | 2,401,186 |
| Angus | 4,372,617 |
| Dundee | 8,602,017 |
| Perth and Kinross | 3,118,176 |
| Orkney | 1,103,278 |
| Shetland | 1,889,843 |
| Western Isles | 1,247,658 |
Authority
| 1981–82
|
| Berwickshire | 1,038,356 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 1,154,679 |
| Roxburgh | 1,537,295 |
| Tweeddale | 109,055 |
| Clackmannan | 1,283,981 |
| Falkirk | 4,428,554 |
| Stirling | 1,016,562 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,272,965 |
| Nithsdale | 100 |
| Stewartry | 542,539 |
| Wigtown | 767,726 |
| Dunfermline | 2,800,067 |
| Kirkcaldy | 3,077,166 |
| North East Fife | 979,538 |
| Aberdeen | 9,533,966 |
| Banff and Buchan | 4,343,622 |
| Gordon | 2,379,107 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 933,388 |
| Moray | 3,552,254 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 435,542 |
| Caithness | 876,132 |
| Inverness | 1,631,231 |
| Lochaber | 1,813,360 |
| Nairn | 251,993 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 4,199,542 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 316,747 |
| Sutherland | 519,316 |
| East Lothian | 3,155,554 |
| Edinburgh | 7,869,440 |
| Midlothian | 1,791,607 |
| West Lothian | 2,182,016 |
| Argyll and Bute | 2,811,692 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 193,589 |
| Clydebank | 3,285,203 |
| Clydesdale | 578,477 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 117,762 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 819,727 |
| Cunninghame | 2,744,500 |
| Dumbarton | 1,177,708 |
| East Kilbride | 98,060 |
| Eastwood | 15,462 |
| Glasgow | 44,099,691 |
| Hamilton | 3,243,635 |
| Inverclyde | 4,443,201 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 1,885,952 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 2,807,798 |
| Monklands | 4,252,050 |
| Motherwell | 5,737,727 |
| Renfrew | 2,186,158 |
| Strathkelvin | 1,539,073 |
| Angus | 2,499,757 |
| Dundee | 5,285,879 |
| Perth and Kinross | 1,309,294 |
| Orkney | 1,082,222 |
| Shetland | 2,624,591 |
| Western Isles | 1,267,392 |
Authority
| 1982–83
|
| Berwickshire | 686,226 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 552,583 |
| Roxburgh | 1,165,695 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 689,627 |
| Falkirk | 1,494,309 |
Authority
| 1982–83
|
| Stirling | 1,335,195 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,387,048 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 412,797 |
| Wigtown | 452,325 |
| Dunfermline | 683,115 |
| Kirkcaldy | 696,260 |
| North East Fife | 829,197 |
| Aberdeen | 7,089,761 |
| Banff and Buchan | 3,306,069 |
| Gordon | 2,240,622 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 817,907 |
| Moray | 2,301,798 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 505,386 |
| Caithness | 817,378 |
| Inverness | 1,375,208 |
| Lochaber | 1,383,564 |
| Nairn | 206,063 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 3,493,364 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 316,309 |
| Sutherland | 477,942 |
| East Lothian | 2,079,858 |
| Edinburgh | 2,327,904 |
| Midlothian | 906,746 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 2,767,417 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 0 |
| Clydebank | 2,201,808 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 167,191 |
| Cunninghame | 745,237 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 0 |
| Eastwood | 0 |
| Glasgow | 37,292,928 |
| Hamilton | 1,543,988 |
| Inverclyde | 3,048,261 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 298,335 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 911,439 |
| Monklands | 3,222,528 |
| Motherwell | 3,296,551 |
| Renfrew | 0 |
| Strathkelvin | 1,198,935 |
| Angus | 1,221,795 |
| Dundee | 1,820,168 |
| Perth and Kinross | 0 |
| Orkney | 852,422 |
| Shetland | 2,654,652 |
| Western Isles | 1,358,959 |
Authority
| 1983–84
|
| Berwickshire | 648,884 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 373,420 |
| Roxburgh | 1,260,321 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 45,021 |
| Falkirk | 0 |
| Stirling | 20,431 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,574,069 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 414,643 |
| Wigtown | 255,317 |
| Dunfermline | 0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 0 |
| North East Fife | 309,583 |
| Aberdeen | 3,724,702 |
| Banff and Buchan | 2,437,206 |
| Gordon | 1,709,877 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 972,194 |
| Moray | 1,987,151 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 515,570 |
| Caithness | 819,544 |
| Inverness | 1,241,308 |
| Lochaber | 1,334,449 |
Authority
| 1983–84
|
| Nairn | 265,393 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 3,091,946 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 323,325 |
| Sutherland | 446,107 |
| East Lothian | 1,050,527 |
| Edinburgh | 0 |
| Midlothian | 0 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 2,554,514 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 0 |
| Clydebank | 1,855,408 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 0 |
| Cunninghame | 0 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 0 |
| Eastwood | 0 |
| Glasgow | 32,355,851 |
| Hamilton | 119,816 |
| Inverclyde | 1,865,250 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 0 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 447,952 |
| Monklands | 1,705,278 |
| Motherwell | 1,037,418 |
| Renfrew | 0 |
| Strathkelvin | 326,922 |
| Angus | 181,321 |
| Dundee | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 0 |
| Orkney | 731,864 |
| Shetland | 2,409,052 |
| Western Isles | 1,723,845 |
Authority
| 1984–85
|
| Berwickshire | 486,805 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 107,262 |
| Roxburgh | 1,265,786 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 0 |
| Falkirk | 0 |
| Stirling | 0 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,673,013 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 359,095 |
| Wigtown | 200,315 |
| Dunfermline | 0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 0 |
| North East Fife | 87,427 |
| Aberdeen | 3,053,523 |
| Banff and Buchan | 1,943,394 |
| Gordon | 1,940,317 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 854,852 |
| Moray | 1,790,081 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 487,297 |
| Caithness | 826,248 |
| Inverness | 1,305,145 |
| Lochaber | 1,225,816 |
| Nairn | 227,117 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 3,241,650 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 394,993 |
| Sutherland | 467,987 |
| East Lothian | 392,369 |
| Edinburgh | 0 |
| Midlothian | 0 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 2,308,945 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 0 |
| Clydebank | 1,774,590 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 0 |
| Cunninghame | 0 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 0 |
Authority
| 1984–85
|
| Eastwood | 0 |
| Glasgow | 32,269,404 |
| Hamilton | 0 |
| Inverclyde | 1,162,804 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 0 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 0 |
| Monklands | 1,196,032 |
| Motherwell | 0 |
| Renfrew | 0 |
| Strathkelvin | 2,775 |
| Angus | 0 |
| Dundee | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 0 |
| Orkney | 779,233 |
| Shetland | 2,764,219 |
| Western Isles | 1,863,547 |
Authority
| 1985–86
|
| Berwickshire | 446,429 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 0 |
| Roxburgh | 1,306,156 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 0 |
| Falkirk | 0 |
| Stirling | 0 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,759,500 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 343,400 |
| Wigtown | 95,565 |
| Dunfermline | 0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 0 |
| North East Fife | 0 |
| Aberdeen | 2,260,303 |
| Banff and Buchan | 1,599,685 |
| Gordon | 1,800,235 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 942,305 |
| Moray | 1,509,258 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 497,879 |
| Caithness | 750,997 |
| Inverness | 1,510,450 |
| Lochaber | 1,398,166 |
| Nairn | 218,689 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 3,474,516 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 467,318 |
| Sutherland | 518,431 |
| East Lothian | 23,235 |
| Edinburgh | 0 |
| Midlothian | 0 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 2,155,278 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 0 |
| Clydebank | 1,778,773 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 0 |
| Cunninghame | 0 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 0 |
| Eastwood | 0 |
| Glasgow | 32,675,646 |
| Hamilton | 0 |
| Inverclyde | 562,537 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 0 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 0 |
| Monklands | 328,169 |
| Motherwell | 0 |
| Renfrew | 0 |
| Strathkelvin | 0 |
| Angus | 0 |
| Dundee | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 0 |
| Orkney | 804,942 |
| Shetland | 2,778,672 |
| Western Isles | 2,171,685 |
Authority
| 1986–87
|
| Berwickshire | 201,135 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 0 |
| Roxburgh | 951,730 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 0 |
| Falkirk | 0 |
| Stirling | 0 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,382,490 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 253,704 |
| Wigtown | 0 |
| Dunfermline | 0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 0 |
| North East Fife | 0 |
| Aberdeen | 0 |
| Banff and Buchan | 558,241 |
| Gordon | 1,838,802 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 779,199 |
| Moray | 682,537 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 388,218 |
| Caithness | 663,077 |
| Inverness | 1,033,853 |
| Lochaber | 1,441,327 |
| Nairn | 181,633 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 3,178,298 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 586,754 |
| Sutherland | 522,874 |
| East Lothian | 0 |
| Edinburgh | 0 |
| Midlothian | 0 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 1,373,972 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 0 |
| Clydebank | 804,237 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 0 |
| Cunninghame | 0 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 0 |
| Eastwood | 0 |
| Glasgow | 21,891,239 |
| Hamilton | 0 |
| Inverclyde | 0 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 0 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 0 |
| Monklands | 0 |
| Motherwell | 0 |
| Renfrew | 0 |
| Strathkelvin | 0 |
| Angus | 0 |
| Dundee | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 0 |
| Orkney | 684,343 |
| Shetland | 2,934,933 |
| Western Isles | 2,137,164 |
Authority
| 1987–88
|
| Berwickshire | 225,306 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 0 |
| Roxburgh | 1,115,301 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 0 |
| Falkirk | 0 |
| Stirling | 0 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,337,917 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 386,158 |
| Wigtown | 265,382 |
| Dunfermline | 0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 0 |
| North East Fife | 0 |
| Aberdeen | 0 |
| Banff and Buchan | 617,681 |
Authority
| 1987–88
|
| Gordon | 2,723,337 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 1,267,315 |
| Moray | 982,346 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 462,702 |
| Caithness | 759,297 |
| Inverness | 1,157,218 |
| Lochaber | 1,396,801 |
| Nairn | 209,500 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 3,339,315 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 789,606 |
| Sutherland | 643,801 |
| East Lothian | 0 |
| Edinburgh | 0 |
| Midlothian | 0 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 1,709,251 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 51,224 |
| Clydebank | 786,456 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 0 |
| Cunninghame | 0 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 63,514 |
| Eastwood | 0 |
| Glasgow | 15,116,893 |
| Hamilton | 0 |
| Inverclyde | 0 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 0 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 0 |
| Monklands | 0 |
| Motherwell | 0 |
| Renfrew | 0 |
| Strathkelvin | 0 |
| Angus | 0 |
| Dundee | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 0 |
| Orkney | 743,450 |
| Shetland | 3,172,405 |
| Western Isles | 2,595,347 |
Authority
| 1988–89
|
| Berwickshire | 91,417 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 0 |
| Roxburgh | 1,124,908 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 0 |
| Falkirk | 0 |
| Stirling | 0 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,557,353 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 413,062 |
| Wigtown | 410,486 |
| Dunfermline | 0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 0 |
| North East Fife | 0 |
| Aberdeen | 0 |
| Banff and Buchan | 246,862 |
| Gordon | 3,276,799 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 1,617,844 |
| Moray | 614,211 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 384,299 |
| Caithness | 1,012,850 |
| Inverness | 1,370,584 |
| Lochaber | 1,800,599 |
| Nairn | 274,618 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 3,793,708 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 985,932 |
| Sutherland | 796,808 |
| East Lothian | 0 |
| Edinburgh | 0 |
| Midlothian | 0 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 1,586,284 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 124,971 |
Authority
| 1988–89
|
| Clydebank | 1,031,201 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 0 |
| Cunninghame | 0 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 33,496 |
| Eastwood | 0 |
| Glasgow | 24,660,513 |
| Hamilton | 0 |
| Inverclyde | 0 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 0 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 0 |
| Monklands | 0 |
| Motherwell | 0 |
| Renfrew | 0 |
| Strathkelvin | 0 |
| Angus | 0 |
| Dundee | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 0 |
| Orkney | 850,377 |
| Shetland | 3,677,667 |
| Western Isles | 2,894,620 |
Authority
| 1989–90
|
| Berwickshire | 48,841 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 0 |
| Roxburgh | 1,339,141 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 0 |
| Falkirk | 0 |
| Stirling | 0 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,684,048 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 509,240 |
| Wigtown | 551,246 |
| Dunfermline | 0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 0 |
| North East Fife | 0 |
| Aberdeen | 0 |
| Banff and Buchan | 136,883 |
| Gordon | 3,788,264 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 1,922,521 |
| Moray | 528,935 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 393,499 |
| Caithness | 1,229,421 |
| Inverness | 1,949,824 |
| Lochaber | 2,148,759 |
| Nairn | 344,628 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 4,154,244 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 1,203,495 |
| Sutherland | 969,864 |
| East Lothian | 0 |
| Edinburgh | 0 |
| Midlothian | 0 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 1,775,900 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 278,995 |
| Clydebank | 1,010,546 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 0 |
| Cunninghame | 0 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 0 |
| Eastwood | 0 |
| Glasgow | 30,697,621 |
| Hamilton | 0 |
| Inverclyde | 0 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 0 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 0 |
| Monklands | 0 |
| Motherwell | 0 |
| Renfrew | 0 |
| Strathkelvin | 0 |
Authority
| 1989–90
|
| Angus | 0 |
| Dundee | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 0 |
| Orkney | 776,917 |
| Shetland | 4,112,702 |
| Western Isles | 3,741,152 |
Authority
| 1990–91
|
| Berwickshire | 0 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 0 |
| Roxburgh | 1,321,472 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 0 |
| Falkirk | 0 |
| Stirling | 0 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,504,110 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 436,944 |
| Wigtown | 600,795 |
| Dunfermline | 0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 0 |
| North East Fife | 0 |
| Aberdeen | 0 |
| Banff and Buchan | 0 |
| Gordon | 3,792,482 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 1,882,382 |
| Moray | 0 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 386,736 |
| Caithness | 1,330,831 |
| Inverness | 1,934,977 |
| Lochaber | 2,398,530 |
| Nairn | 350,804 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 4,231,891 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 1,303,836 |
| Sutherland | 1,006,044 |
| East Lothian | 0 |
| Edinburgh | 0 |
| Midlothian | 0 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 1,041,664 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 317,125 |
| Clydebank | 650,646 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 0 |
| Cunninghame | 0 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 0 |
| Eastwood | 0 |
| Glasgow | 24,536,123 |
| Hamilton | 0 |
| Inverclyde | 0 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 0 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 0 |
| Monklands | 0 |
| Motherwell | 0 |
| Renfrew | 0 |
| Strathkelvin | 0 |
| Angus | 0 |
| Dundee | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 0 |
| Orkney | 783,399 |
| Shetland | 4,395,805 |
| Western Isles | 3,757,098 |
Authority
| 1991–92
|
| Berwickshire | 0 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 0 |
| Roxburgh | 1,139,087 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 0 |
| Falkirk | 91,878 |
| Stirling | 132,696 |
Authority
| 1991–92
|
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,288,127 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 175,842 |
| Wigtown | 455,431 |
| Dunfermline | 0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 0 |
| North East Fife | 0 |
| Aberdeen | 0 |
| Banff and Buchan | 0 |
| Gordon | 3,808,288 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 1,828,221 |
| Moray | 0 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 330,314 |
| Caithness | 1,249,076 |
| Inverness | 1,657,779 |
| Lochaber | 2,463,394 |
| Nairn | 306,917 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 4,159,560 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 1,343,234 |
| Sutherland | 992,735 |
| East Lothian | 0 |
| Edinburgh | 526,144 |
| Midlothian | 0 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 618,210 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 301,748 |
| Clydebank | 438,557 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 0 |
| Cunninghame | 7,774 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 61,626 |
| Eastwood | 8,108 |
| Glasgow | 22,687,417 |
| Hamilton | 0 |
| Inverclyde | 153,317 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 2,382 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 0 |
| Monklands | 0 |
| Motherwell | 0 |
| Renfrew | 28,488 |
| Strathkelvin | 0 |
| Angus | 0 |
| Dundee | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 29,303 |
| Orkney | 639,138 |
| Shetland | 4,603,666 |
| Western Isles | 3,907,490 |
Authority
| 1992 –93
|
| Berwickshire | 0 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 0 |
| Roxburgh | 726,723 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 0 |
| Falkirk | 123,120 |
| Stirling | 116,455 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 1,151,985 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 208,499 |
| Wigtown | 360,746 |
| Dunfermline | 0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 0 |
| North East Fife | 0 |
| Aberdeen | 0 |
| Banff and Buchan | 0 |
| Gordon | 3,598,836 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 1,587,282 |
| Moray | 0 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 326,070 |
| Caithness | 1,161,797 |
| Inverness | 1,299,935 |
| Lochaber | 2,315,434 |
| Nairn | 246,839 |
Authority
| 1992–93
|
| Ross and Cromarty | 4,060,836 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 1,339,757 |
| Sutherland | 853,085 |
| East Lothian | 0 |
| Edinburgh | 535,752 |
| Midlothian | 0 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 315,749 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 73,749 |
| Clydebank | 150,464 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 0 |
| Cunninghame | 10,760 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 100,892 |
| Eastwood | 11,583 |
| Glasgow | 17,400,837 |
| Hamilton | 0 |
| Inverclyde | 169,044 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 15,273 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 6,720 |
| Monklands | 0 |
| Motherwell | 0 |
| Renfrew | 36,735 |
| Strathkelvin | 0 |
| Angus | 0 |
| Dundee | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 27,462 |
| Orkney | 359,131 |
| Shetland | 4,592,216 |
| Western Isles | 4,186,649 |
Authority
| 1993–94
|
| Berwickshire | 0 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 0 |
| Roxburgh | 204,134 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 0 |
| Falkirk | 154,770 |
| Stirling | 137,399 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 686,273 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 80,855 |
| Wigtown | 0 |
| Dunfermline | 0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 0 |
| North East Fife | 0 |
| Aberdeen | 0 |
| Banff and Buchan | 0 |
| Gordon | 2,982,207 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 1,460,318 |
| Moray | 0 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 242,217 |
| Caithness | 790,443 |
| Inverness | 436,489 |
| Lochaber | 2,028,174 |
| Nairn | 223,819 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 3,777,488 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 1,305,608 |
| Sutherland | 758,411 |
| East Lothian | 0 |
| Edinburgh | 512,148 |
| Midlothian | 0 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 51,203 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 0 |
| Clydebank | 0 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 0 |
| Cunninghame | 22,996 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 91,443 |
| Eastwood | 12,449 |
Authority
| 1993–94
|
| Glasgow | 11,103,999 |
| Hamilton | 0 |
| Inverclyde | 157,531 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 16,954 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 58,711 |
| Monklands | 0 |
| Motherwell | 0 |
| Renfrew | 33,768 |
| Strathkelvin | 0 |
| Angus | 0 |
| Dundee | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 47,026 |
| Orkney | 266,699 |
| Shetland | 4,249,266 |
| Western Isles | 3,959,316 |
Authority
| 1994–95
|
| Berwickshire | 0 |
| Ettrick and Lauderdale | 0 |
| Roxburgh | 0 |
| Tweeddale | 0 |
| Clackmannan | 0 |
| Falkirk . | 157,459 |
| Stirling | 172,810 |
| Annandale and Eskdale | 532,875 |
| Nithsdale | 0 |
| Stewartry | 0 |
| Wigtown | 0 |
| Dunfermline | 0 |
| Kirkcaldy | 0 |
| North East Fife | 63,731 |
| Aberdeen | 34,676 |
| Banff and Buchan | 0 |
| Gordon | 2,838,437 |
| Kincardine and Deeside | 935,054 |
| Moray | 36,735 |
| Badenoch and Strathspey | 175,155 |
| Caithness | 461,494 |
| Inverness | 55,629 |
| Lochaber | 2,042,337 |
| Nairn | 116,909 |
| Ross and Cromarty | 3,678,043 |
| Skye and Lochalsh | 1,297,404 |
| Sutherland | 683,292 |
| East Lothian | 0 |
| Edinburgh | 552,583 |
| Midlothian | 0 |
| West Lothian | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 78,175 |
| Bearsden and Milngavie | 0 |
| Clydebank | 0 |
| Clydesdale | 0 |
| Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | 0 |
| Cumnock and Doon Valley | 0 |
| Cunninghame | 33,688 |
| Dumbarton | 0 |
| East Kilbride | 136,710 |
| Eastwood | 36,763 |
| Glasgow | 1,681,240 |
| Hamilton | 0 |
| Inverclyde | 165,384 |
| Kilmarnock and Loudoun | 32,469 |
| Kyle and Carrick | 50,032 |
| Monklands | 0 |
| Motherwell | 0 |
| Renfrew | 37,524 |
| Strathkelvin | 0 |
| Angus | 0 |
| Dundee | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 80,911 |
| Orkney | 0 |
| Shetland | 5,039,193 |
| Western Isles | 4,478,932 |
Angling
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on the levels of fish population in the River Black Cart and the River White Cart; what plans he has to encourage the development of angling on these rivers; and if he will meet representatives of the angling community to discuss potential initiatives.
:The Government have no records of the levels of fish populations on either the River Black Cart or White Cart but I am glad to note that in the last few years salmon have been returning to those waters. Although the development of angling is principally for individual fishery owners or angling clubs, my Department has provided them with scientific advice on a number of matters. I meet representatives of salmon and freshwater fisheries interests when it is appropriate to do so.
Paisley (Movement Of Residents)
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what is his latest estimate of the movement or migration of residents from the Ferguslie Park partnership area to the Foxbar Rivers area of Paisley since the launch
| Urban programme expenditure | ||||||
| 1988–89 | 1989–90 | 1990–91 | 1991–92 | 1992–93 | 1993–94 | |
| Ferguslie Park2 | ||||||
| Capital | 0·217 | 0·828 | 1·000 | 0·750 | 0·750 | 0·780 |
| Revenue | 0·415 | 0·536 | 0·860 | 1·190 | 1·390 | 1·440 |
| Foxbar, Rivers2 | ||||||
| Capital | 0·007 | — | 0·018 | 0·006 | 0·044 | 0·176 |
| Revenue | 0·281 | 0·186 | 0·155 | 0·134 | 0·150 | 0·244 |
Note: Figures relate to estimate expenditure by Renfrew District Council and Strathclyde Regional Council, 75 per cent. of which is reimbursed by the Scottish Office. These areas will also have benefited from District and Region-wide projects.
1991–92
| 1992–93
| 1993–94
| |
Expenditure by Renfrewshire Enterprise
| |||
| Ferguslie Park | 0·532 | 0·410 | 0·422 |
| Foxbar, Rivers | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
Expenditure by Scottish Homes
|
Housing capital expenditure by Renfrew district council
| ||||||
1988–89
| 1989–90
| 1990–91
| 1991–92
| 1992–93
| 1993–94
| |
Ferguslie Park
| ||||||
| Housing Revenue Account | 4·065 | 3·603 | 2·764 | 2·235 | 1·173 | n.a. |
| Non-housing Revenue Account | — | 0·036 | — | 0·379 | 0·110 | n.a. |
Note:—Figures for 1988–89 and 1991–92 are actual outturns; figures for 1992–93 are estimated outturns; no figures are available for 1993–94 as, under the new Housing Plan system, Renfrew District Council was not requested to provide outturn figures; Renfrew District Council should be able to provide 1993–94 figures for Ferguslie Park and figures for Foxbar, Rivers.
Waste Disposal
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list all contracts for waste disposal, waste management, cleansing and refuse collection which have been let to private contractors by Scottish local authorities in each of the last five years and in each case showing
| Year | District | Type of contract | Company etc. name | Address given |
| 1989 | Tweeddale | Refuse disposal | Tarmac Econowaste | Ettingshall, Wolverhampton |
| 1989 | Gordon | CFC extraction | Mr. F. Watt North East Refrigeration Services | Constitution Street, Inverurie |
of the Scottish Office led initiative; what has been the expenditure in (a) capital and (b) revenue terms in each area during that period; and if he will make a statement.
My right hon. Friend has made no estimate of the movement of residents from the Ferguslie Park partnership area to the Foxbar, Rivers area of Paisley. Full information on public expenditure in Ferguslie Park and Foxbar, Rivers since the launch of the Ferguslie Park Partnership is not available. The following tables summarise available information. In all tables "n.a." indicates "not available".
| Urban Partnership Vote Expenditure | |
| £ million | |
| Ferguslie Park | |
| 1989–90 | 0·135 |
| 1990–91 | 0·405 |
| 1991–92 | 0·538 |
| 1992–93 | 0·575 |
| 1993–94 | 0·639 |
Note: The Urban Partnership Vote meets most of the running costs of the Partnership and provides some funding for projects and consultancies. Support from this source is only available to Partnership areas and so no figures are shown for Foxbar, Rivers.
1991–92
| 1992–93
| 1993–94
| |
| Ferguslie Park | 2·700 | 7·100 | 6·500 |
| Foxbar, Rivers | 0·480 | 0·480 | 0·200 |
which company has been awarded the contract and the location of the main headquarters of the company in each case.
This information is not routinely collected centrally and only partial data are available for 1989, 1990 and 1991. This is listed in the following table. There is no information for 1992 and 1993.
Year
| District
| Type of contract
| Company etc. name
| Address given
|
| 1989 | Badenoch and Strathspey | Refuse disposal | J. Armitt Contractor | 21 Myrtlefield, Aviemore |
| 1989 | Lochaber | Refuse collection/disposal | Knoydart Community Association | Inverie, Knoydart |
| 1989 | Skye and Lochalsh | Refuse collection | L. & C. Waste Tech. | Dunvegan Road, Portree |
| 1989 | Edinburgh City | Waste disposal | Tarmac Econowaste | Kaimes Quarry, Kirknewton, Edinburgh |
| Conveyance/waste/material | British Railways Board | Railfreight Construction, Rail House, Store House, Manchester | ||
| 1989 | Midlothian | Disposal of domestic/trade waste | Wimpey Waste (now UK Waste Management Limited) | Gate House, Turnpike Road, High Wycombe, Bucks |
| 1989 | Orkney Islands | Refuse collection | T. & J. Paterson | North School, Eday |
| Refuse collection | T. A. Muir | Garso No. 1, North Ronaldsay | ||
| Refuse collection | Mrs. A. Davidson | North Rendall, Papa Westray | ||
| Refuse collection | M. A. Williamson | Olivebank, Stronsay | ||
| Refuse collection | J. & H. Bews | Astley Cottage, Shapinsay | ||
| Refuse collection | W. L. Seatter | Mount Pleasant, Pier Wall, Westray | ||
| Refuse collection | L. Wilson | Hillfield, Sanday | ||
| 1989 | Strathkelvin | Waste disposal | Shanks & McEwan | A8 Edinburgh Road, Coatbridge |
| 1991 | Badenoch and Strathspey | Landfill site operation | D. Ritchie | Pineview, Carrbridge |
| Tip control/litter control | D. Ritchie | Pineview, Carrbridge | ||
| 1991 | Lochaber | Refuse transfer/disposal | Caird Environmental Ltd. | Greengairs, Riggend |
| 1991 | Eastwood | Street cleansing | Summerlea Garage | Thornliebank, Glasgow |
| 1991 | Shetland Islands | Refuse disposal | P & O Ferries | — |
| 1990 | Gordon | CFC extraction | Mr. F. Watt North East Refrigeration Services | Constitution Street, Inverurie |
| 1990 | Badenoch and Strathspey | Civic Amenity Skip Hire | John Williamson | Ashwood, Kingussie |
Women's Centre, Paisley
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list the (a) capital and (b) revenue expenditure committed to the development of the women's centre in the Rivers area of Foxbar, Paisley, from urban programme, local authority and other sources; and if he will make a statement on this initiative.
Urban programme grant of £172,386 for capital costs and, for four years, £94,308 per annum for current costs, was approved on 7 September 1992. The sponsoring local authority, Strathclyde regional council, meets 25 per cent. of those amounts; 75 per cent. is met by the Scottish Office. I have no information about financial assistance from other sources.
Partnership Initiative, Paisley
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will launch a partnership in the Foxbar, Rivers area of Paisley on a similar basis to that which exists in Ferguslie Park; and if he will make a statement.
:Decisions on the future direction of urban regeneration policy in Scotland and on the possible designation of future initiative areas will be taken in the light of the policy review which is currently under way. This review is taking account of the wide range of views expressed in response to the Scottish Office consultation paper, "Progress in Partnership".
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what is his most up-to-date estimate of the population of Ferguslie Park, Paisley in each year since 1988; what was the population of the area when the Ferguslie Park initiative was launched; what is his best estimate of the number of people resident in the area at that time who are still resident there; what evaluation he has undertaken of the residential ingress and egress of people from the area over that period; and if he will make a statement.
Information on the population of Ferguslie Park since the Ferguslie Park partnership was launched in 1988 is available from two sources. A sample household survey commissioned by the Scottish Office in 1988, shortly after the partnership was formed, estimated the population to be 5,005. The 1991 census of population showed that the population in April of that year was 4,657. No estimate has yet been made of the number of people resident in the area at the time that the partnership was launched who are still resident there. However, a recently completed repeat sample household survey will shortly yield some information on this topic and on the characteristics of households moving into the area since 1988. This survey will also provide a 1993 estimate of population. No attempt has been made to survey households who have left the area since 1988.
Appointments
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list the (a) name, (b) appointment and (c) salary, allowance, honorarium or other payment of each person resident within the area of Eastwood district council and the Barrhead regional division, including Neilson and Uplawmoor, who has been appointed to any position by him or any of his Ministers; and if he will make a statement.
The addresses of appointees are not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Women's Centre, Hunterhill
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on his Department's policy in relation to the development of a women's centre in the Hunterhill area of Paisley on a similar basis to that provided in the Rivers area of Foxbar.
The Foxbar, Rivers womens centre was provided through the urban programme. Should an application for a similar facility be submitted for the Hunterhill area of Paisley it will be considered against the eligibility criteria and priorities of the urban programme.
Housing
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the most recent estimate of the number of Scottish houses owned by (a) local authorities, (b) Scottish Homes, (c) housing associations, (d) private landlords, (e) co-operatives and (f) other tenure types which are affected by rising and penetrating damp, and rising and penetrating dampness and condensation; how long, at current rates of expenditure, it will take to eliminate these problems; and if he will make a statement.
Information about the condition of the housing stock in Scotland is contained in the report of the first Scottish house condition survey, produced by Scottish Homes and published in 1993. It gives details of the number of houses affected by rising or penetrating damp and suffering from dampness and condensation. A copy of the report is available in the Library.It is not possible to determine how long it will take to deal with those problems. The responsibility for improving houses in the private sector rests with their owners and improvement grant is available to assist them. Local authorities, Scottish Homes, housing associations and other agencies have responsibility for their own stock and must deal with these problems within the resources available to them.Condensation and dampness have been identified as national priorities for the use of resources and local authorities have been asked to prepare strategies for dealing with these problems and to set output targets against which to measure their performance.
Johnstone North Industrial Improvement Area
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what plans he has to make further funds available to the Johnstone north industrial improvement area; and if he will make a statement.
Urban programme funds of £25,000 per annum have been made available from 1988–89 to 1994–95 for improvements to properties in the Johnstone north industrial improvement area. It is for Renfrew district council, the sponsoring local authority, to consider whether it wishes to apply for further funds.
Mental Health
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what evaluation he has made of the success of the after-care tasks initiative—ACTIVE—run by Renfrew district council for mental health; if he will provide additional mainline or urban programme funding to enable ACTIVE to develop further its services and programmes; and if he will make a statement.
The Scottish Office has not evaluated the work of the aftercare tasks initiative project. However, based on an evaluation by Strathclyde regional council of the project's first four years of urban programme-funded operations, we have recently approved a further three years' urban programme grant of £75,770 per annum. It would be for Strathclyde regional council to consider whether additional mainline or urban programme funding would be appropriate.
Next Steps Agency Initiatives
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on his Department's plans in relation to next steps agency initiatives for (a) 1994, (b) 1995 and (c)1996.
I am now responsible for eight next steps executive agencies. The latest of these, the Student Awards Agency for Scotland, was launched on 5 April 1994. It is Government policy that all agencies should be reviewed some three years after their launch. I announced on 28 April 1994 that, following such a review, agency status should continue for the Registers of Scotland. The reviews of Historic Scotland and the Scottish Fisheries Protection Agency are nearing completion and I hope to make an announcement shortly on the outcome of those reviews. The triennial review of the Scottish Agricultural Science Agency is due to be completed by April 1995 and those of the Scottish Office Pensions Agency, the Scottish Prison Service and Scottish Record Office by April 1996. I announced on 10 May 1994 that the Scottish Court Service, part of the Scottish Courts Administration, will be established as an executive agency from 3 April 1995. I have also announced previously that the Fisheries Research Services and the Roads Directorate are under consideration for executive agency status. I will make an announcement about their future in due course.
Contaminated Land
:To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the amount of financial allocation made to Scottish Enterprise and the Glasgow development agency to deal specifically with clearing up contaminated land, in 1991–92, 1992–93, 1993–94 and 1994–95.
:The resources which my right hon. Friend allocates to Scottish Enterprise, and those which Scottish Enterprise allocates to the local enterprise companies, are allocated within expenditure blocks and not generally for a specific purpose or activity.
It is for Scottish Enterprise and the individual local enterprise companies to decide, in the context of the strategic and policy guidance given to them and within the overall resources allocated to them, the priority and resources to be devoted to a particular project or activity such as decontamination works.
Motorway Building Costs
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how much, on average, it costs to construct a mile of motorway with lighting and signage at current prices.
The average cost to construct a mile of motorway with lighting and signing, including land and preparation costs but excluding V AT at current prices is as follows:
- Rural three-lane motorway: Approximately £6·8 million.
- Urban two-lane motorway: Approximately £11 million.
Flood Protection
To ask the Secretary of Stale for Scotland if he will use any powers available to him to assist with flood protection measures at Park avenue, Paisley; and if he will make a statement.
Under the Flood Prevention (Scotland) Act 1961, powers to protect non-agricultural land from flooding rest with regional and islands councils. It is for Strathclyde regional council to determine the extent to which it will use these powers to protect any such land at Park avenue, Paisley. Flood prevention schemes made by councils and confirmed by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State currently attract grant at the rate of 50 per cent. on the eligible costs.
Sandeel Fishing
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what estimate he has made of the numbers of Danish boats currently fishing for sandeels over traditional Fife fishing grounds.
Around 50 Danish sandeel vessels have been sighted in the North sea, some 20 to 40 miles east of the Fife coast. The sandeel fishery is highly seasonal and this activity is only expected to last between four and six weeks.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) what assessment he has made of the tonnage of sandeels caught by Danish vessels over traditional Scottish fishing grounds in each of the last five years; and what was the value of the sandeels caught.(2) what assessment he has made of the tonnage of sandeels caught by Danish vessels over the Wee bankie, the Cockenzie bank and the Marr bank in each of the last five years; and what was the value of the sandeels caught.
The following table shows sandeel catches taken by all nations in the western central North sea—an area extending from the Firth of Tay to Flamborough Head, extending roughly 120 miles into the North Sea. The 1993 figures will become available later this year. Separate figures are not readily available for Danish catches.
| Year | Catch ('000 tonnes) | Average value per tonne £ |
| 1988 | 291·1 | 36 |
| 1989 | 228·3 | 39 |
| 1990 | 141·4 | 45 |
| 1991 | 228·2 | 48 |
| 1992 | 422·4 | 46 |
Source: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (catches): Scottish Office Agriculture and Fisheries Department (value of catches).
The bulk of these catches were taken in the southern and eastern parts of the area. Estimated catch in the Marr bank, Wee bankie and Cockenzie bank was 60,000 tonnes in 1992.
Further Education College Lecturers
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on the future arrangements for the initial training of further education college lecturers in Scotland.
In recent years, much has been done to raise the status and quality of further education in Scotland so that students have the opportunity to develop their skills and abilities through vocational as well as academic routes.If FE students are to receive top-quality education, college lecturers must themselves be effectively trained to provide it. The kind of training that they receive has a significant bearing on the standards of education the public expect FE colleges to deliver. This is why the Government set up a review committee in May 1992 to consider and make recommendations on the future arrangements for the initial training of lecturers. The report of the review committee was published in September last year and has since been the subject of an extensive consultation exercise with representatives of the education sector.The Government fully endorse the report's conclusions that lecturing staff in further education should be trained and qualified to the highest standards. In writing to the FE colleges about their development plans, before final decisions were reached on the report, Scottish Office Education Department officials stressed the desirability, in the interests of both colleges and lecturers, of continuing to support the teaching qualification (further education) course offered by the Scottish school of further education, which is now part of Strathclyde university. I am glad to say that there has been an encouraging response and an increase in the uptake of places on the course. Although we do not intend to make it compulsory for lecturers to undertake the course, we accept the report's recommendation that lecturers should be strongly encouraged to undertake the teaching qualification (further education) course and will continue to explore ways in which the recent increase in uptake can be sustained. The General Teaching Council for Scotland will also, of course, continue to accredit the TQ(FE) course for registration purposes and to encourage prospective lecturers to register, although, as recommended in the report, registration will continue to be a matter for individuals. Relationships between FE and schools will develop as a result of our "Higher Still" proposals and, since incorporation, a variety of FF/HE links have emerged. We accept, therefore, the report's recommendation that the issues of compulsory qualification and GTC registration should be reconsidered in a few years time in the light of these developments.To ensure the effective implementation of the other recommendations in the report, we will establish a working group, with strong representation from the FE sector, to define FE training needs and competences, and to draw up national guidelines on which future TQ(FE) courses will be based. The working group, assisted by the short-term appointment of a consultant, will be asked to report by November 1994. In tandem with this exercise, the Scottish Office Education Department will, in conjunction with the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council, conduct an analysis of the costs of the current TQ(FE) course and consider costed options for its future funding. In the meantime, the existing TQ(FE) course will continue to be
| Regional Enterprise Grants and Regional Selective Assistance Offers accepted 1 August 1992 to 31 | ||||||
| Travel-to-work-area | Regional Innovation Grants | Regional Investment Grants | Regional Selective Assistance | |||
| Number | Value (£) | Number | Value (£) | Number | Value (£) | |
| Dunfermline | 5 | 125,000 | 2 | 17,659 | 3 | 240,000 |
| Kirkcaldy | 4 | 97,630 | 8 | 102,873 | 8 | 2,774,000 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what is his estimate of the level of regional selective assistance grants and regional enterprise grants in Fife compared to the number and levels of grant offered.
[holding answer 27 June 1994]: The data from projects completed either successfully or otherwise in recent years have shown that, on average, 70 per cent. of the value of regional selective assistance offers accepted in Scotland was eventually paid. The comparable figure for regional enterprise grants was 75 per cent. Figures for individual regions will fluctuate around these levels.
Capital Investment
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will give the level of capital investment by manufacturing firms by local authority region and for Scotland over the last three years.
[holding answer 27 June 1994]: The information is set out in the following table. Figures are provided from the last three years for which information is available:
| £ million | |||
| Region | 1991 | 1990 | 1989 |
| Borders | 10·9 | 173·3 | 16·2 |
| Central | 292·4 | 220·7 | 185·3 |
| Dumfries and Galloway | 31·8 | 30·5 | 33·0 |
| Fife | 72·7 | 90·8 | 87·2 |
| Grampian | 105·2 | 106·6 | 91·0 |
| Highland | 25·2 | 29·6 | 23·1 |
| Lothian | 177·3 | 165·9 | 200·1 |
| Orkney, Shetland and Western Isles | 3·0 | 2·2 | 3·9 |
| Strathclyde | 417·0 | 521·1 | 522·0 |
| Tayside | 69·9 | 106·3 | 70·5 |
| Scottish total | 1,205·5 | 1,291·0 | 1,232·2 |
Source: Annual Census of Production 1989–1991.
Provided Solely by the Scottish school of further education. The school will be invited to embody as many as possible of the Anderson committee recommendations into the course structure and content, and to collaborate with the colleges to ensure that it is stimulating, responsive and relevant.
Regional Enterprise Grant
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what was the total number and value of regional enterprise grants for (a) innovation and (b) investment and regional selective assistance awards for the Dunfermline, Kirkcaldy and North-Fast Fife travel-to-work areas for the year ended 1 August 1993.
[holding answer 27 June 1994]: The information requested is given in the table. North-East Fife TTWA was not classed as an assisted area in either the previous or current version of the assisted areas map.
Woodlands
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish a table showing how many Forestry Commission woodlands have been sold to the private sector since 1980, or from whichever year figures are available; how many of these are subject to (a) voluntary and (b) legally binding access agreements; what is the total hectarage of these woodlands; and if he will make a statement.
[holding answer 24 June 1994]: Between July 1981, when the Forestry Commission's disposals programme started, and 31 March 1994, the Commission sold some 2,500 individual areas of forest land covering 105,000 hectares. Arrangements for securing continued public access to Forestry Commission woodlands, by way of prior agreements entered into between the Commission and local authorities, were introduced in October 1991. By 31 March 1994, the Commission had sold eight areas of forest land, covering 123 hectares, which are subject to legally binding access agreements. The Commission does not maintain records of the extent of voluntary public access allowed to woodlands sold without legally binding agreements.
Trade And Industry
Vehicle Emissions
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what plans he has to support or promote the development of low or zero-emission vehicles for use in public transport services; and if he will make a statement.
My Department is collaborating with other Departments on a programme of field trials for alternative fuelled vehicles. For further details, I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to him by my hon. Friend the Minister for Roads and Traffic on 28 June 1994, Official Report, columns 477–78.
Post Office
To ask the President of the Board of Trade, pursuant to his answer of 26 May, Official Report, columns 324–25, where he has published his estimate of the effect of granting each specific request of the Post Office for greater commercial freedom, including its effect on (a) the current business and (b) projects of existing private firms.
I have published no such estimates.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will make a statement clarifying the Government's position regarding the future of the postal service.
We will be publishing a Green Paper shortly.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade (1) whether Parcelforce will retain its VAT exempt status once it is privatised;(2) what services offered by
(a) the Royal Mail and (b) Parcelforce which are currently zero-rated will attract: VAT after privatisation;
(3) pursuant to his answer of 16 June, Official Report, column 630, whether all the services at present offered by Parcelforce will retain their VAT zero-rating status after privatisation.
The issue of VAT on postal services will be covered in the Green Paper on postal services, which will be published shortly.
Insolvency Service
To ask the President of the Board of Trade whether draft controls have been drawn up for privatisation of all or any part of the work done by the Insolvency Service.
No decision has yet been taken on whether work currently undertaken by the Insolvency Service should be contracted out to the private sector. No draft controls have been drawn up.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what were the conclusions of the current review into the Insolvency Service by Stoy Hayward on whether the private sector can beat the Insolvency Service for value for money.
Stoy Hayward is not due to complete its study until the end of July 1994.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade how much additional money is planned to be spent on the Insolvency Service in the financial year 1994–95.
The 1994–95 running cost provision to the Insolvency Service provides an additional £2.66 million compared with its 1993–94 expenditure.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what level of checks is being imposed on files in the Insolvency Service before they are closed; what staff are doing the checking; and on what length of contract they are employed.
All files are read by specialist, permanent staff before they are closed.
Competitiveness White Paper
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what account was taken of the law of comparative costs in international trade and developing the proposals in his White Paper on competitiveness.
As the White Paper on competitiveness makes it clear, the Government are committed to fair and open markets which provide a spur to enterprise and improved efficiency. This allows the United Kingdom to export those goods which it can produce most efficiently in line with the law of comparative costs.
Accountancy Firms
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what plans he has to investigate the relationship between the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and major accountancy firms.
I have no such plans.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will initiate an inquiry into the role of British accountancy firms in money laundering in the case of AGIP.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: No. The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales has already investigated this matter.
Industrial Capacity
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will publish a table showing for each industry the estimated percentage utilisation of capacity in 1990 and the increase or decrease in output since 1990 at the latest available date, together with the estimated utilisation of capacity.
Official data on capacity utilisation by industry are not available. The CBI industrial trends survey monitors changes in balances of companies reporting below capacity working, by industry groups. Industrial output figures are published in the monthly digest of statistics. Both publications are available in the Library of the House.
Electricity
To ask the President of the Board of Trade, pursuant to his oral answer of 22 June, Official Report, column 231, if he will make a statement on the proposals for opening up the international market in electricity.
The Government welcome the European Commission's proposals to liberalise the electricity market in the European Union. The European energy market must be opened up if costs are to be driven down and the competitiveness of European industry improved. The Government's objective is therefore to reach agreement on the Commission's proposals as soon as possible.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what steps he is taking to encourage the electricity generating industry to buy from British suppliers.
The electricity generating industry buys from competitive suppliers. The White Paper, "Competitiveness: Helping Business to Win", Cm 2563, sets out the approach that the Government are taking to ensure that British suppliers maximise their competitiveness.
Supervisory Bodies
To ask the President of the Board of Trade under which sections of the Companies Acts the recognised supervisory bodies owe a duty of care to shareholders, creditors, employees, bank depositors and pension scheme members.
The Companies Acts do not impose a statutory duty of care on the recognised supervisory bodies.
Gas Industry
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what training his Department provided or funded for the Director General of Gas Supply prior to her appointment; and if he will make a statement.
Ms Spottiswoode was appointed as Director General designate one month before she took up post as Director General of Gas Supply on 1 November 1992, so that she could familiarise herself with the industry and with current issues. My Department was aware of her intention to attend a course on the gas industry before she took up her appointment but was not asked to contribute to the cost.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what information was supplied to his Department during the appointment process by the Director General of Gas Supply concerning connection with the gas industry as called for in paragraph 14 of his job specification.
Ms Spottiswoode's connections with the gas industry were made known to the Department both by the executive search consultants and by Ms Spottiswoode herself during the appointment process.
Exchange Rate
To ask the President of the Board of Trade, further to his White paper, "Competitiveness: Helping Business to Win", whether he considered the effect of movements on the exchange rate on competitiveness; and if he will publish his estimate of the amount by which labour productivity in manufacturing would have to rise to offset the increase in United Kingdom relative export prices compared with those of Germany since February 1993.
As the White Paper makes it clear, the Government believe that the United Kingdom's competitiveness depends on improving productivity and controlling costs.
Company Inspections
To ask the President of the Board of Trade on how many occasions since 1979 his Department has discussed conflicts of interests with the individuals appointed to act as inspectors to investigate company affairs.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer that I gave to the hon. Member for Newcastle upon Tyne, Central (Mr. Cousins) on 13 April 1994, Official Report, column 229.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade how many of the individuals currently acting as inspectors under the provisions of the Companies Acts have any business connection with any accountancy and/or law firm criticised in reports by his Department.
Three current Companies Act inspectors have business connections with accountancy firms which have been the subject of criticism in a published inspectors' report.
Steel
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what estimate he has made as to the adequacy of the supply of home-produced or imported steel; and if he will publish a table showing (a) United Kingdom production, imports and net home disposals of steel in each month in 1989 and in this year to date, (b) the rate of return on capital required to make it profitable for United Kingdom steel manufacturers to invest in new capacity in the United Kingdom at current rates of exchange and (c) the actual rates of return on replacement and historic cost in 1993 generally and for the United Kingdom.
Estimates of the adequacy of steel supply are a matter for industry. The available figures of production, imports and net home disposals are published in the monthly digest of statistics—table 10.2—a copy of which is in the Library of the House. It is for companies to decide what rate of return is required to make investment in new capacity profitable. There are no official data on rates of return, but information may be available from commercial organisations that analyse company accounts.
British Coal
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what assessment he has made of the number, standard and quality of those companies which have pre-qualified to buy the mining assets of British Coal; whether he has now invited further companies to make offers for those assets; and if he will make a statement.
In considering all applications to pre-qualify, DTI, in consultation with its advisers, took into account a range of factors, including the technical and commercial ability of applicants to manage regional coal companies and care and maintenance collieries, and the likely ability of the applicant to finance any bid they may tender. No further companies have been invited to make offers for the mining assets of the British Coal Corporation.
Pyramid Selling
To ask the President of the Board of Trade how many prosecutions for the contravention of the Pyramid Selling Schemes Regulations 1989 and the Pyramid Selling Schemes (Amendment) Regulations 1990 took place in 1993–94; and how many were successful.
There were no such prosecutions in 1993–94.
Skills Shortages
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what discussions he has had with (a) his Government colleagues, (b) employers' organisations and (c) the training and enterprise councils regarding the Price Waterhouse report on the west midlands economy with particular reference to skills shortages.
The Government office for the west midlands is aware of the Price Waterhouse report, which is one of a series on the west midlands economy. GOWM will be taking the report into account alongside others in discussions with TECs and representational bodies following publication of the White Paper, "Competitiveness: Helping Business to Win".
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what plans he has to take new measures to deal with skills shortages in conjunction with his Government colleagues.
The supply of skilled labour is one of the key competitiveness issues addressed in the Government's White Paper, "Competitiveness: Helping Business to Win", Cm. 2563. New measures to be implemented over the next three years are outlined in the White Paper. Training is the responsibility of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Employment.
Market Testing
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what is his Department's policy towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing.
My Department's policy towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing follows the code of practice on open government.
Receivers
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will introduce legislation under which receivers would owe a duty of care to the unsecured creditors.
I have no plans to do so.
Nuclear Safety Convention
To ask the President of the Board of Trade what progress has been made on proposals for an international nuclear safety convention.
A convention on nuclear safety was agreed by more than 70 states at a diplomatic conference at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna on 17 June. It will be open for signature from 20 September and will enter into force after ratification by 22 states, including 17 states with at least one civil nuclear power plant.The main objective of the convention is to achieve and maintain a high level of nuclear safety worldwide. Countries ratifying the convention will submit national reports, for discussion at periodic review meetings, on how they meet or intend to meet safety obligations established in the convention. The Government welcome the agreement on the convention text and hope that the states with civil nuclear powers plants will ratify the convention.
Carnon Holdings Ltd
To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will make a statement about his Department's loans to Carnon Holdings Ltd.
I have today agreed to a conditional waiver of repayment of my Department's loans outstanding to Carnon Holdings Ltd.Two loans were extended to the company, in 1986 and 1988, totalling £23·4 million, to safeguard employment at the company's South Crofty tin mine. When the loans were offered, independent forecasters were expecting that the tin price would recover; this would have permitted Carnon to trade profitably and hence repay the loans. However, the continuing low price of tin has meant that there is no longer any realistic prospect of repayment.The waiving of repayment of the loans is dependent on two conditions: that the company succeeds, by the closing date of 4 August, in raising the "minimum subscription" set out in its prospectus to be published on 30 June; and that the House of Commons does not object to this waiver before the closing date.The waiving of the debts is intended to permit Carnon the opportunity to raise fresh funding to continue its operations but my decision is not intended to imply any comment on or endorsement of the company's financial standing or position. Any potential investor must form his or her own judgment of the merits of investing on the basis of information supplied by Carnon.
Fire Safety
To ask the President of the Board of Trade (1) if he will place in the Library a copy of the report of the Deregulation Bill construction task force;(2) if he will make it his policy not to make any changes to the Fire Precautions Act 1971 until there has been a debate in the House; and if he will make a statement;(3) if he will place in the Library a copy of the recommendations of the Home Office fire safety division to the Deregulation and Contracting Out Bill contruction task force;(4) which fire service organisations and local authority organisations were consulted by the construction task force before it produced its recommendations regarding deregulation of fire safety regulations.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: The recommendations of all seven business deregulation task forces were published on 19 January and copies were placed in the Library of the House. The working papers on which their recommendations were based were placed in the Library of the House on 30 March.
The construction industry task force held discussions with officials and Ministers in several Government Departments, including the Home Office. No discussions were held with fire service or local authority organisations because the nature of the task force exercise was to provide the Government with evidence of business concerns.
The fire safety review, announced by my right hon. Friend the President of the Board of Trade on 17 January, Official Report, column 381, explored issues identified by the task force and others. Publication of the report of this review was announced by my right hon. Friend the President of the Board of Trade on 22 June, Official Report, columns 228–29. The Government are committed to full consultation on the report with all interested parties and we have made it clear that no changes will be made to existing arrangements until these consultations are complete.
To ask the President of the Board of Trade when he will publish the recommendations of the construction industry deregulation task force; and if he will make a statement on the review of fire safety and enforcement carried out by the task force.
[holding answer 27 June 1994]: The recommendations of all seven business deregulation task forces were published on 19 January and copies were placed in the Library of the House. The working papers on which their recommendations were based were placed in the Library of the House on 30 March.Publication of the review of fire safety legislation and enforcement was announced by my right hon. Friend the President of the Board of Trade on 22 June,
Official Report, columns 228–29 and I have nothing further to add to his statement.
Home Department
Chain Letter Earnings Schemes
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what action has been taken to facilitate tracing of promoters of chain letter earnings schemes; and what further measures he plans;(2) what representations have been made to him regarding chain letter earnings schemes in 1993–94; and if he will make a statement;(3) how many complaints he has received with regard to participants who have suffered financially as a result of chain letter earnings schemes in 1993–94; and if he will make a statement;(4) what action is being taken to increase the protection of the participant in chain letter earnings schemes;(5) if he will make a statement on chain letter earnings schemes; and what steps he has taken to maximise the awareness of the possible offences that can be committed under these schemes.
I am replying because chain letters involving money-making schemes have in some cases been held by the courts to be illegal lotteries under provisions now contained in the Lotteries and Amusement Act 1976 because they have the overall object of distributing money by chance. The schemes are also subject to the general criminal law on theft and fraud, for the enforcement of which—including the tracing of suspected offenders—the police are responsible.Whether a particular scheme is an illegal lottery is a matter which only a court could decide. The advice given to recipients of "get-rich-quick" schemes is to ignore their claims or, if they wish to take matters further, to pass offending materials to the police for consideration and possible investigation. Information on prosecutions under the 1976 Act involving chain letter schemes is not held centrally.During 1993–94 the Home Office received seven letters from Members of Parliament on behalf of constituents and four letters from members of the public about chain letter schemes. None of the letters concerned participants who had suffered financially.
Gammahydroxybutyrate
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what steps he intends to propose to control the availability and promotion of gammahydroxybutyrate; and what assessment he has made, and on what basis, about the availability of gammahydroxybutyrate in England and Wales and its promotion on a commercial basis.
Gammahydroxybutyrate—also known as GHB or GBH—is manufactured in the United States of America for use as an anaesthetic. It is not available as a licensed medicine in the United Kingdom but the manufacture, advertisement and sale of the substance fall within the scope of the Medicines Act 1968 as it has pharmacological effects.We understand that the Medicines Control Agency, an agency of the Department of Health, is currently investigating its promotion and sale following recent press reports that the substance is being marketed in the United Kingdom. The maximum penalties on indictment for advertising, production and sale of an unlicensed medicine are two years imprisonment and/or a fine of £5,000.Gammahydroxybutyrate has only recently emerged as a drug of misuse in the United Kingdom. We understand it has a stimulant effect if taken in small doses and that larger doses can cause vomiting, drowsiness, depressed breathing and heart rate. The first reported seizure of GHB was made in April this year using powers under the Medicines Act 1968.There have been up to now only a few reports of gammahydroxybutyrate misuse and we have no plans at present to bring it under the controls of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. The key criterion for bringing a substance under the Act's controls is whether misuse of the substance has or is capable of having harmful effects sufficient to constitute a social problem. The position is being kept under review.
Escort And Custody Services
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what checks are carried out by the police on applicants who apply for work at contracted-out prisons and for the contracted-out court escort service.
Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from Derek Lewis to Mrs. Barbara Roche, dated 29 June 1994:
The Home Secretary has asked me to reply to your recent Question about the checks carried out by the police on applicants who apply for work at contracted out prisons and for the contracted court escort service.
In my letter of 22 June, Official Report, column 171, I referred to the routine enquiries that are made about all people who wish to work at contracted out prisons and for the contracted court escort service. These investigations are similar to those made in relation to applicants for Prison Service employment and include checks made by the police against records held in the Criminal Records Office. Candidates applying for employment in custodial duties and escort functions in both the public and the private sector are exempted from the provisions of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 by the Rehabilitation Act 1974 (Exceptions) Order 1975. Convictions which ordinarily are regarded as "spent" are therefore taken into account.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his answer of 22 June, Official Report, column 169, how many grades of employee working in the court escort service in the Metropolitan police area there will be when Securicor takes over the contract; what will be the pay for each grade; and how the pay and grading compare with that of the current incumbents.
Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from Derek Lewis to Mrs. Barbara Roche, dated 29 June 1994:
The Home Secretary has asked me to reply to your recent Question about the number of grades of employee working in the court escort service in the Metropolitan Police area when Securicor takes over the contract; the pay for each grade and how the pay and grading compare with that of the current incumbents.
There are two basic uniformed grades, prisoner custody officers and supervisory prisoner custody officers, excluding the senior management and administration staff at Securicor's headquarters.
The core grades who are currently performing these duties are police constables and police sergeants, prison officers and senior prison officers.
The pay of prisoner custody officers is determined by the contractor concerned. Details are not held by the Prison Service and it is for the contractor to decide whether they should be made public.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what is his Department's policy towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing.
A decision on whether to publish a particular report by external consultants in relation to market testing would be based on all the relevant circumstances, including any necessary commercial considerations.
Paedophile Unit
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what steps are expected to be taken to enhance the effectiveness of the new paedophile unit at the National Criminal Intelligence Service in the context of the possible disbanding of the obscence publications branch at Scotland Yard.
No proposals about the future of the obscene publications branch have yet been made, but the Metropolitan police has given assurances that its work will continue whatever the recommendations of the current headquarters and specialist units' review.The branch is an operational unit, responsible for the investigation of paedophile offences. The paedophile unit of the National Criminal Intelligence Service is a non-operational, national intelligence unit. The two units have different and distinct roles and it would not be appropriate for the National Criminal Intelligence Service to take on any operational functions from the branch.
Firearms Certificates
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much has been raised from the issue of firearms and shotgun certificates in each year since 1990 and in the current year to date; and when he expects to make an announcement of the outcome of discussions on the levy attached to firearm and shotgun certificates.
The following sums have been raised from the issue and renewal of firearm and shotgun certificates.
| Year | £ |
| 1990 | 5,286,500 |
| 1991 | 5,130,200 |
| 1992 | 4,988,800 |
Secure Training Centres
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will now name the fifth site for a secure training centre covering the London and south-east area.
The centre will be located on Home Office land at Cookham wood in Kent adjacent to, but Separate from, the Prison Service establishment.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make draft rules for secure training centres available to the House.
Rules for the regulation and management of secure training centres will be made by statutory instrument and, as such, will not be available in their final form until after the Criminal Justice and Public Order Bill receives Royal Assent. However, in order to indicate to potential contractors what areas the rules will cover in order to assist them in formulating their tenders, an administrative paper has been prepared which outlines proposed rules for secure training centres. A copy of this paper has been placed in the Library today.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will now publish details of the design and build specification of the proposed secure training centres for young offenders.
I have today placed in the Library of the House a copy of the design and build specification, together with an associated note to tenderers containing information on performance standards.
Criminal Offences (Charges)
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list in tabular form which actions have been made criminal offences by legislative changes for each year since 1979, giving details of the Act which brought about the change.
The information requested is not recorded centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Firearms
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many firearm permits and shotgun certificates were issued in Wales in 1993; and what are the projected figures for 1994.
A total of 2,976 firearms certificates were issued in Wales during 1992-701 new certificates and 2,275 renewals—and 20,481 shot gun certificates were issued—3,252 new certificates and 17,229 renewals.Figures for 1993 are not yet available and it is not the practice to make projections for the future.
Police Cars
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many civilians have died in each of the last five years in accidents involving police cars.
The centrally available information relates to accidents where death to civilians has arisen in the course of either police pursuits or responses to emergency calls.The figures for England and Wales are as follows:
| Year | Civilian fatalities |
| 1989 | 36 |
| 1990 | 23 |
| 1991 | 30 |
| 1992 | 28 |
| 1993 | 28 |
Single Regeneration Budget
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the effect of the inclusion of section 11 funding into the single regeneration budget on metropolitan authorities.
Existing commitments under section 11 will continue to the end of the approved project life. Thereafter, the allocation of funding under the single regeneration budget will be determined on the basis of applications reflecting local priorities, within the terms of the bidding guidance. The specific aims of the budget include initiatives intended to
and to"enhance the employment prospects, education and skills of local people, particularly the young and those at a disadvantage, and promote equality of opportunity"
"promote initiatives of benefit to ethnic minorities".
Immigration
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many different individuals have been detained under the Immigration Act powers during the most recent 12-month period; and how many of them were (a) asylum seekers and (b) others.
In 1993, 10,530 people were detained overnight or longer under powers contained in the Immigration Act 1971These records do not distinguish between asylum seekers and others.
Drink Driving
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many notifiable offences of causing death by dangerous driving and causing death by careless driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs there were in (a) 1992 and (b) 1993, when the criteria used to calculate the 1991 figures are applied.
The offence of causing death by careless driving when under the influence of drugs or alcohol was created by the Road Traffic Act 1991. Since 1992 police forces have provided the Home Office with the number of offences of causing death by dangerous driving together with the number of offences of causing death by careless driving when under the influence of drugs or alcohol. These combined figures for 1992 and 1993 were published in the Home Office Statistical Bulletin, "Notifiable Offences England and Wales 1993". It is not possible to ascertain what the numbers of offences would have been if the pre-1992 classification were still in place.
Combat 18
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the activities of Combat 18; and what plans he has to ban the organisation.
The Government deplore the activities of any group which advocates violence. The police are well aware of the activities of Combat 18 and any alleged attacks or intimidation should be reported to them. There are no statutory powers to proscribe organisations in Great Britain other than in the special circumstances provided for in the Prevention of Terrorism Act.
Arrests
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people were arrested by the Metropolitan police each year from 1980 to 1993.
The information requested is given in the following table:
| Arrests made by the Metropolitan Police for notifiable offences, 1980 to 1993 | |
| Year | Number of arrests |
| 1980 | 105,017 |
| 1981 | 97,276 |
| 1982 | 100,804 |
| 1983 | 99,258 |
| 1984 | 104,017 |
| 1985 | 109,786 |
Year
| Number of arrests
|
| 1986 | 103,084 |
| 1987 | 109,706 |
| 1988 | 108,706 |
| 1989 | 111,420 |
| 1990 | 116,865 |
| 1991 | 113,570 |
| 1992 | 100,426 |
| 1993 | 93,020 |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people were arrested in each police force area in England and Wales in 1992 and 1993.
The information requested is given in the following table:
| Arrests in England and Wales in 1992 and 1993, by police force area | ||
| Police force area | Arrests in 1992 | Arrests in 1993 |
| Avon and Somerset | 35,532 | 36,874 |
| Bedfordshire | 17,220 | 18,136 |
| Cambridgeshire | 17,787 | 18,307 |
| Cheshire | 30,688 | 30,603 |
| Cleveland | 29,462 | 29,430 |
| Cumbria | 21,132 | 20,020 |
| Derbyshire | 24,241 | 23,309 |
| Devon and Cornwall | 33,538 | 35,049 |
| Dorset | 18,716 | 16,826 |
| Durham | 24,828 | 24,986 |
| Essex | 41,986 | 38,526 |
| Gloucestershire | 18,284 | 17,341 |
| Greater Manchester | 121,466 | 123,996 |
| Hampshire | 62,016 | 61,991 |
| Hertfordshire | 25,313 | 25,388 |
| Humberside | 35,324 | 30,926 |
| Kent | 54,254 | 52,551 |
| Lancashire | 62,345 | 63,285 |
| Leicestershire | 22,859 | 22,287 |
| Lincolnshire | 21,286 | 15,175 |
| London, City of | 4,516 | 5,202 |
| Merseyside | 75,634 | 70,414 |
| Norfolk | 19,750 | 19,386 |
| Northamptonshire | 19,906 | 19,873 |
| Northumbria | 70,734 | 69,907 |
| North Yorkshire | 23,020 | 23,867 |
| Nottinghamshire | 46,733 | 41,512 |
| South Yorkshire | 46,297 | 46,324 |
| Staffordshire | 38,935 | 38,322 |
| Suffolk | 16,612 | 15,758 |
| Surrey | 20,511 | 17,846 |
| Sussex | 38,365 | 37,844 |
| Thames Valley | 59,144 | 57,748 |
| Warwickshire | 13,612 | 15,439 |
| West Mercia | 35,042 | 36,269 |
| West Midlands | 135,262 | 131,753 |
| West Yorkshire | 84,332 | 63,407 |
| Wiltshire | 13,860 | 15,624 |
| Dyfed Powys | 14,823 | 14,325 |
| Gwent | 17,552 | 18,708 |
| North Wales | 24,568 | 25,674 |
| South Wales | 57,412 | 57,030 |
| England and Wales (excluding MPD) | 1,594,897 | 1,567,238 |
| Metropolitan Police1 | 100,426 | 93,020 |
| 1Notifiable offences only. | ||
Asylum Seekers
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much in cash terms and in constant prices the Government spent in 1980, 1990, 1991 and 1992 on the reception of asylum seekers.
There are no formal reception arrangements for asylum seekers. They are entitled to a range of statutory benefits and services which are available to the rest of the population. The Government provide funding to voluntary organisations to advise and assist newly arrived asylum seekers, and to meet the costs of short term, emergency accommodation and maintenance for destitute asylum seekers before they gain access to the statutory system. Grants to voluntary organisations for this purpose for the financial years 1990–91, 1991–92, and 1992–93 are set out in the table and taken at 1990 prices. No grants were made to assist the reception of asylum seekers in 1980.
| Year | Cash terms £ | Constant prices £ |
| 1990–91 | 312,000 | 312,000 |
| 1991–92 | 830,650 | 781,421 |
| 1992–93 | 939,600 | 851,087 |
Commercial Vehicles (Accidents)
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the verdicts of unlawful killing which have been recorded by coroners in relation to accidents involving (a) light goods vehicles and (b) PCVs over the last five years.
This information is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
European Elections
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if he will cause an inquiry to be undertaken, in cases where European law forbids the revelation of names and addresses of nominators of a candidate in European Union elections and where there are prima facia grounds for complaint, which could examine the bona fides of the nominators and investigate the background and political and financial connections of relevant candidates whose departure abroad makes them unavailable for questioning;(2) if he will cite the precise European statute which prohibits
(a) other candidates and (b) members of the public from having sight of candidates' nominators, their names and addresses, in an election to the European Parliament.
We know of no such European law. As is the case at parliamentary elections, at European parliamentary elections in the United Kingdom candidates and the elections agents, proposers and seconders of candidates may attend the proceedings and inspect the nomination papers during the period for delivery of nomination papers. The addresses of the proposer, seconder and assentors are not given on nomination papers, although their electoral numbers are given. The names of the persons nominating and seconding a candidate for election to the European Parliament are published in the statement of persons nominated
Uk Det Services Ltd
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department on how many occasions the contractors have defaulted on any part of the contract to manage Blakenhurst prison; what was the nature of the default on each occasion; and what was the penalty imposed.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from Derek Lewis to Ms Joan Ruddock, dated 29 June 1994:
The Home Secretary has asked me to reply to your recent Question about Blakenhurst prison.
Default notices have been issued against the contractors on two occasions and payment has been withheld on one occasion. Under the terms of the contract, a default notice may be issued if satisfactory progress has not been made within 20 days of a warning.
On the two occasions where default notices have been issued, the first related to security in cells and the second to maintenance. These problems were rectified satisfactorily. There are no default notices outstanding at present.
In the light of the incident on 24 February which occurred in one of the houseblocks, the Prison Service did not consider that UKDS fully delivered the required service during that month. During the incident, some parts of the prison were not fully in control, with consequent effects on regime delivery; and public relations and contingency arrangements were not satisfactory. The areas where the service was not considered to be up to the required standard were outlined in my letter of 12 April (Official Report, Column 3).
There was a financial penalty imposed, and the sum which was withheld from UKDS was £41,166·90, exclusive of VAT, which in our judgement represented the extent to which the required level of service had not been delivered in February.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department on how many occasions the Home Office has given consent for United Kingdom Detention Services Ltd. to alter the services provided under the terms of the contract to run Blakenhurst prison; and what alterations were made.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from Derek Lewis to Ms Joan Ruddock, dated 29 June 1994:
The Home Secretary has asked me to reply to your recent Question about the number of occasions on which consent has been given for United Kingdom Detention Services Ltd. to alter the services provided under the terms of the contract to run Blakenhurst Prison; and what alterations were made.
It was agreed in May 1994 that United Kingdom Detention Services Ltd. could alter the contractual basis on which two of the services were provided. First, the number of hours out of cell was reduced from 15 to 14. Second, visiting arrangements were changed to take account of actual visiting patterns. As a result the visiting period has been changed from 13·00-21·00 to 13·00–20·00, and additional morning visits, particularly during school holidays, at Christmas and on other Bank Holidays, have been added.
Lord President Of The Council
House Of Commons
To ask the Lord President of the Council if he will make a statement on the origins of the 10 o'clock rule in respect of business of the House; what assessment he has made to its suitability to current conditions; and what plans he has to change it.
The origins of the 10 o'clock rule lie in the 1880's. Following a report from the Select Committee on Parliamentary Procedure in 1886, William Smith, the then First Lord of the Treasury, proposed in 1888 a series of rules of procedure. The impetus for the regulation of the hours of the House resulted from a series of very late sittings in the previous sessions. The hours of sitting of the House have been regulated by Standing Order since 1888 to the present day, except during the period 1940–47 when they were regulated by Sessional Order. Prior to 1888 only Wednesday and morning sittings were regulated.I am currently having discussions with the hon. Member for Newcastle Upon Tyne, East (Mr. Brown), in the light of the report of the Select Committee on Sittings of the House. The report did not however envisage a change to the 10 o'clock rule.
Disabled People
To ask the Lord President of the Council if he will set up a Select Committee specifically to consider the needs and rights of disabled people.
I have no plans to do so.
Defence
Parachute Jumps
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to his answer of 16 March, Official Report, column 749, about static line fatalities, whether the four fatalities were included in "Static Line Fatalities Under Training", published in October 1992.
Of the four static line parachute jump fatalities at Weston-on-the-Green between 1978 and 1983 included in my answer of 16 March, three were listed in October 1992 in a document entitled "Static Line Fatalities Under Training". The fourth, that of Private Bradshaw on 13 June 1978, was not included owing to an administrative error.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the accident during military training at Weston-on-the-Green in August 1972 involving Nicholas James.
Senior Under Officer Nicholas James sustained concussion and injuries to his legs and lower spine as a result of a military parachute training accident at Weston-on-the-Green on 15 August 1972. He was treated at the John Radcliffe hospital, Oxford and later returned to the Royal Military Academy, Sandhurst. The accident was caused by SUO James becoming entangled with the parachute of another parachutist during the course of his descent.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the accident during military training at Weston-on-the-Green on or about 13 June 1978 involving John Bradshaw.
Private Bradshaw, a regular soldier on the military basic parachute course, died on 13 June 1978 as a result of the injuries sustained in an accident at Weston-on-the-Green. Private Bradshaw's parachute pack made contact with the door post of the aircraft as he exited, causing him to become entangled in the parachute rigging line and the canopy only partially to open. Private Bradshaw did operate his reserve parachute, but too late to allow its full deployment.
Accountancy Firms
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many contracts and for what total sum were let out by his Department and agencies for which it is responsible to (a) Coopers and Lybrand, (b) KPMG Peat Marwick, (c) Ernst and Young, (d) Price Waterhouse, (e) Arthur Andersen, (f) Touche Ross, (g) Grant Thornton, (h) Robson Rhodes and (i) Pannell Kerr Forster for (i)privatisation, (ii) market testing, (iii) management advice, (iv) accounting, (v) audit, (vi) consultancy and (vii) other services in (1) 1980 to 1983, (2) 1984 to 1987, (3) 1988 to 1991 and (4) 1992–93.
The information requested is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Public Bodies
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the advisory non-departmental public bodies sponsored by his Department which are required to lay their annual reports before Parliament.
There is no formal requirement for any of my Department's advisory non-departmental public bodies to lay their annual reports before Parliament. The annual reports in respect of the Dartmoor steering group and working party and the Review Board for Government Contracts have, however, been placed in the Library of the House on previous occasions.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list his Department's advisory non-departmental public bodies which are required to produce annual reports.
The following advisory non-departmental public bodies sponsored by my Department are required in their terms of reference to produce an annual report:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the advisory bodies which he has set up in his Department since the publication of "Public Bodies 1993".
No advisory non-departmental public body has been established by my Department since the publication of "Public Bodies 1993".
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the advisory non-departmental public bodies sponsored by his Department which have a statutory basis.
Only two of the advisory non-departmental public bodies sponsored by my Department have a statutory basis. They are:
South Georgia
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what provision he has made for the spiritual guidance of the troops stationed on South Georgia.
The South Georgia garrison is visited every six weeks by ships based in the Falkland islands. A padre regularly accompanies these sailings and services are held either aboard ship or on the island. Those based in South Georgia have a direct radio link to the Falkland islands and there is a resident service padre at Mount Pleasant as well as a Roman Catholic priest in Port Stanley. The Roman Catholic priest is an officiating padre to the British forces. Either of these can be contacted and consulted as necessary.
Arms Sales
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to his answer of 21 June, Official Report, column 118, if he will list (a) the countries to which arms have been sold over the last 12 months and (b) those countries to which arms have not been sold because of human rights abuse.
United Kingdom defence statistics, table 1.11, contains information on United Kingdom exports of defence equipment by region—the 1994 edition will be published in mid-July this year—and the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms covers transfers of certain major arms by country. It has not been the practice of this or preceding Administrations to list all arms sales by country. It would be for my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary to address the question of human rights abuses.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the policy adopted by his Department towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing.
In accordance with the Government's policy of extending access to official information so as to improve public understanding of the way that Government works, the Ministry of Defence would normally expect to be able to publish consultants' reports in relation to its market testing and other "Competing for Quality" programmes except where there is a clear need to observe commercial confidences, the disclosure of which would damage the competitive position of companies or in-house bid teams.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will set out the total cost of external consultancy fees incurred by his Department in relation to market testing.
My Department has provided information on the cost of external consultancy support used in the "Competing for Quality" programme over the period 1 April 1992 to 31 December 1993 to the Treasury and Civil Service Select Committee as part of its inquiry into the civil service. The Ministry's expenditure on external consultancy support in relation to the "Competing for Quality" programme for the period was £36,000. Expenditure figures for consultancy support contracts let for the current programme period, which ends on 31 September 1994, are not yet available.
Transport
Road Construction
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list those stretches of motorway and trunk roads where porous asphalt has been used in construction; what cost benefit analysis he has carried out in relation to the full costs and savings of using porous asphalt in road construction and repair; and if he will make a statement.
The question which is related to the use of porous asphalt is an operational matter for the Highways Agency. I have asked the chief executive, Mr. Lawrie Haynes to write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Lawrie Haynes to Ms Joan Walley, dated 27 June 1994 :
You asked the Secretary of State to list those stretches of motorway and trunk roads where porous asphalt has been used in construction; what cost benefit analysis he has carried out in relation to the full costs and savings using porous asphalt in road construction and repair. I have been asked to reply.
Porous asphalt has been laid as trials on A38 at Burton, MI (South) Leeds and M6 north of Junction 18. These trials have been successful and led to the announcement on 28 July 1992 about the wider use of porous asphalt where conditions are suitable and it is cost effective. Porous asphalt will be used on 14 schemes in the Roads Programme, in due course.
Wheel Clamping
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what recent representations he has received regarding the need for legislation to regulate wheel clamping.
I have been asked to reply.The most recent representations in favour of legislation to regulate wheel clamping on private land have come from hon. Members in the House and in another place during proceedings of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Bill. In response the Government have indicated that they are well aware of public concern about the excesses of some wheel clamping operators and that they are actively considering a range of solutions.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what consultations he has held with the motoring organisations about the need for regulation or control of wheel clamping.
I have been asked to reply.During the public consultation exercise organised by my Department, the views of all interested parties, including the motoring organisations, were invited. The Automobile Association and the Royal Automobile Club both sent in their views.
Coastguard Agency
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what was the cost of the Coastguard Agency reception on the Royal Yacht Britannia to mark the launching of the agency; and who was invited to attend the event.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Lord MacKay, hosted an official reception on board HMY Britannia, to mark the launch of the Coastguard Agency—Coastguard—and the Marine Safety Agency—MSA. The approximate cost was £1,600 to which may be added any necessary harbour dues.In addition to eighty members of staff from Coastguard and MSA the guest list included 10 senior representatives of the Department of Transport, six local dignitaries and Members of Parliament, 13 officials of other United Kingdom and European Government Departments and the EC, 14 representatives of major suppliers and contractors to the agencies, and 87 representatives of shipping and maritime industries, services and associations.
Health And Safety, Christopher House
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to his answer of 3 March, Official Report, column 835, what assessment he has made of whether all relevant EC directives/United Kingdom safety laws have been complied with during the move of his staff to St. Christopher house, London; and if all visual display unit work stations have had full risk assessments carried out.
This question relates to operational matters of the Highways Agency. I have asked the chief executive, Mr. Lawrie Haynes, to write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Lawrie Haynes to Mrs. Gwyneth Dunwoody, dated 28 June 1994:
The Minister for Roads and Traffic, Mr. Key, has asked me to write to you in reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about the move of Highways Agency staff to St. Christopher House.
You asked what assessment had been made of whether all relevant EC Directives/UK Safety Laws have been complied with during the move and if all VDU workstations have had full risk assessments carried out.
We have replaced light fitting in the new offices and replaced chairs at VDU workstations where necessary to comply with EC Directives.
We are continuing to carry out checks to ensure compliance with all the relevant EC Directives and UK Safety Laws following the move. A six-week assessment of the operation of new VDU workstations will be completed shortly.
Following completion of these checks, I am confident that we will fully meet all safety requirements.
I trust this information is helpful.
Road Schemes
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many environmental impact assessments relating to road schemes are currently in preparation by his Department.
This question relates to the operational matters of the Highways Agency. I have asked the chief executive, Mr. Lawrie Haynes, to write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Lawrie Haynes to Mr. Harry Cohen, dated 29 June 1994:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS ON ROAD SCHEMES
The Minister for Roads and Traffic, Mr. Robert Key, has asked me to write to you in reply to your recent Parliamentary question about environmental assessments.
An environmental assessment is carried out for each scheme in the national roads programme and an Environmental Statement is published for those schemes which are likely to have a significant effect on the environment.
The environmental assessment commences at a very early stage in the development of a scheme. The Trunk Road in England 1994 Review identifies the schemes in the national road programme together with their priority.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what criteria his Department's pre-1985 environmental assessment of the M11 link road was based upon; and if he will place a copy of these criteria in the Library;(2) if he will give details of the schemes considered by his Department for the proposed M11 link road which fully complied with EC directive 85/337/EEC; what was the environmental impact and cost of each; and if he will highlight the differences of each from the scheme approved;(3) when, before the 1985 decision to authorise construction of the M11 link road, the environmental effects of the scheme were assessed; and if he will place in the Library a summary of the main factors and considerations taken into account;(4) if he will list all aspects of the current M11 Link Road project that do not comply with European directive 85/337/EEC;(5) why the EC standards set out in European directive 85/337/EEC were not considered by the subsequent public inquiries into the M11 link road; if it is policy that the rules of such inquiries should allow consideration of such relevant environmental factors; and if he will make a statement.
These questions all relate to the Al2 Hackney Wick to M11 link road, which is an operational matter for the Highways Agency, and I have therefore asked the chief executive to write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Lawrie Haynes to Mr. Harry Cohen, dated 28 June 1994:
The Minister for Roads and Traffic has asked me to write to you in response to your Parliamentary Questions. about the environmental assessment of and the application of Directive 85/337/EEC to, the Al2 Hackney Wick to M11 Link Road since they are operational matters for the Highways Agency.
Prior to the 1985 decision to proceed with the Link Road environmental assessments were carried out in preparation for the Public Inquiry held in 1983. These were in accordance with current knowledge of methods of assessment at that time and made use of frameworks as laid down by the 1977 report of the Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment (SACTRA). A copy of that report is already available in the House of Commons Library. I enclose a copy of the framework relating to the Link Road. The best available summaries of the main factors and considerations then taken into account are contained in the Inspector's Report and the decision letter of the Secretaries of State, copies of both of which I understand were sent to you at the time they were published since you gave evidence at the public inquiry.
Directive 85/337/EEC as implemented by section 105(A) of the Highways Act 1981 requires that where the Secretary of State has under consideration a proposed new highway he shall determine whether or not it requires an environmental assessment, and if so, that an Environmental Statement be published and the public be allowed to comment on it. The Secretary of State is required to consider the Environmental Statement and any opinion expressed on it and to publish his decision as to whether or not initiate the project. The European Commission has accepted that the Link Road project was begun before the Directive came into force in the UK and so the question of whether there are aspects of the Link Road which do not comply with the Directive, or of there being alternative schemes which do or do not comply, does not arise.
No references were made to the Directive at the 1987 and 1989/90 public inquiries into the Link Road because development consent for the project had already been granted. Consideration has always been given to environmental factors at public inquiries where it was relevant to do so.
I have also been asked to write to you in connection with your Parliamentary Question about the employment of Bray's Detective Agency, and since the reply concerns a number of road schemes I will send you a separate letter; however, for the sake of completeness of the record I will just mention here that the Link Road is one of those schemes.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many and what proportion of the Department of Transport road schemes in the last five years have not been recommended by public inquiry inspectors; and of those recommendations for rejection, how many have been endorsed by the Secretaries of State for Environment and Transport.
[holding answer 23 June 1994]: As the information requested relates to operational matters of the Highways Agency, I have asked the chief executive to write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Lawrie Haynes to Mr. Simon Hughes, dated 28 June 1994:
I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about how many and what proportion of the Department of Transport road schemes in the last five years, have not been recommended by public inquiry inspectors; and of those recommendations for rejection, how many have been endorsed by the Secretaries of State for Environment and Transport.
In the last five years, five schemes have not been recommended by public inquiry inspectors out of a total of 146 schemes which have been to public inquiry.
Of those five recommendations for rejection, the Secretaries of State for the Environment and Transport endorsed all but one small regional scheme. This has led to the removal of the schemes from the programme, or fresh orders being published.
In about 40 cases the modifications, recommended by the Inspectors, have been endorsed.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much his Department has paid in bonuses on road construction contracts; and how much his Department has received in penalty payments on road construction contracts, over the past five years.
[holding answer 23 June 1994]: As the information requested relates to operational matters of the Highways Agency, I have asked for the chief executive to write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Lawrie Haynes to Mr. Simon Hughes, dated 28 June 1994:
I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about how much the Department of Transport has paid in bonuses on road construction contracts and how much the Department has received in penalty payments on road construction contracts, over the past five years.
Incentive contracts involving bonuses and charges are used mainly for major maintenance. During the five year period 1989/90–1993/94, bonuses paid amounted to £18·3M and charges collected were £2M. These figures are based on contracts for which final accounts have been settled and could ultimately be higher. A measure of the ratio of traffic delay costs saved to net bonus payments made is averaging around 5:1.
In addition, a total of £7·88M was paid out to two new construction contracts again for the economic advantages of having the new routes ready sooner, but of course the reason for paying bonuses is to reduce the time for the works and, therefore, the disruption caused to the travelling motorist.
Public Inquiry Cases
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list by traffic area office the number of cases taken to public inquiry over the last five years; and in those cases, how many licence holders had (a) the licences revoked, (b) licences suspended, (c) licences curtailed, (d) warnings issued and (e) no further action taken.
Some of this information is contained in the annual reports of the Traffic Commissioners and licensing authorities, which have been placed in the Library of the House. The remaining information could be collated only at disproportionate expense.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what has been the total cost to date of the market testing of (a) the records service in his Department and (b) the review currently being undertaken in the records policy and advice unit; and what is the total budget of the market test.
:The records service market test has cost £60,466 to date. It has a budget of £85,000. The record policy and advice unit is examining how to improve record management standards and cost effectiveness throughout the Department, especially the review process before files are destroyed. The review process study has cost £7,300.
Port Reception Facilities
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list those ports that have independent contractors providing port reception facilities.
The Marine Safety Agency is currently undertaking a comprehensive survey to assess the quality of reception facilities provided in United Kingdom ports. The survey will indicate the extent to which independent contractors are used to provide facilities. Consideration will be given as to what useful information might be published when the results of the survey have been evaluated.
Unlicensed Light Goods Vehicle Operators
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list by traffic area office all cases of LGV operators being convicted as a result of being unlicensed for the last five years.
A list of all cases of LGV operators convicted as a result of being unlicensed for the last five years can be obtained only at disproportionate cost.However, the total number of cases prosecuted by the vehicle inspectorate for not possessing a goods vehicle operator's licence from April 1989 to March 1994 is 4,648. This figure is broken down as follows:
Number
| |
| Scotland | 278 |
| North West | 590 |
| North East | 919 |
| South Wales | 458 |
| West Midlands | 650 |
| West | 239 |
| East | 418 |
| South East | 1,096 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list by traffic area office the current estimated number of unlicensed LGV operators and the methods used to calculate this figure.
We have no reliable estimates of the number of unlicensed LGV operators.
Road Toll Charges
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment his Department has made of the effect on the regions of the United Kingdom of road toll charges; and if he will make a statement.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Glasgow, Rutherglen (Mr. McAvoy) on 24 January at column 78.
Oil Discharges
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what steps the Government will take to ensure that cross-checks between oil record books and automatic printout of discharges will become a routine part of port state control inspections.
Port state control inspections already include the routine inspection of the oil record book. Further consideration is being given to the minimum extent of routine inspections by our partners in the Paris memorandum of understanding on port state control and the Government are seeking their urgent consideration of all of Lord Donaldson's recommendations on port state control.
Rail Privatisation
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the inconvenience caused to the travelling public of the non-interchangeability of tickets in the privatised rail companies.
Ticketing arrangements are at present an operational matter for the British Railways board. For the future, the Secretary of State has instructed the franchising director to require franchisees to offer tickets which are inter-available between their services where he believes that the benefits of doing so will outweigh the likely benefits of price competition and service diversity. The franchising director is considering the implementation of this policy in consultation with British Rail and the rail regulator.
Market Testing
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what is his Department's policy towards the publication of external consultants' reports in relation to market testing.
Decisions on whether to publish reports by external consultants in market tests are taken on a case by case basis in the light of all the relevant circumstances, including commercial confidentiality.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will set out the total cost of external consultancy fees incurred by his Department in relation to market testing.
The information requested is given in the table. It includes all the items in the Department's competing for quality programmes, including contracting out and privatisation.
| Expenditure to 31 March 1994 | |
| £000s, excluding VAT | |
| Cost | |
| Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency: | |
| CSL (support for in-house bids) | 83 |
| Touche Ross (support for client side and strategy advice) | 152 |
| Prime (support for client side and strategy advice) | 215 |
| Capita (support for in-house bids) | 44 |
| Driving Standards Agency: | |
| Shreeveport (support for in-house bids) | — |
| Basis (support for client side) | 20 |
| DVOIT: | |
| KPMG Peat Marwick (financial advice) | 553 |
| Theodore Goddard (legal advice) | 317 |
| Dibb Lupton Broomhead (legal advice) | 227 |
| Price Waterhouse (reporting accountants) | 91 |
| CSL (customer advice) | 37 |
| Ernst and Young (customer advice) | 106 |
| Transport Research Laboratory: | |
| KPMG Peat Marwick (study of options for privatisation and their feasibility) | 78 |
| Highways Agency: | |
| Touche Ross (advice on approaches to property management) | — |
| Central Transport Group: | |
| Shreeveport (support for in-house bids) | 19 |
| Basis (support for client side) | 29 |
| Admiral (support for client side) | 6 |
| London Underground Limited: Escalators out of service | ||||||||||
| Period 11 | Period 12 | Period 13 | Period 1 | Period 2 | ||||||
| 1 January 1994 to 29 January 1994 | 30 January 1994 to 26 February 1994 | 27 February 1994 to 31 March 1994 | 1 April 1994 to 30 April 1994 | 1 May 1994 to 28 May 1994 | ||||||
| Line | Number | Per cent. | Number | Per cent. | Number | Per cent. | Hours | Per cent. | Hours | Per cent. |
| Bakerloo | 66 | 4·8 | 70 | 4·9 | 101 | 5·8 | 1,535 | 6·4 | 681 | 3·3 |
| Central | 227 | 8·4 | 284 | 10·0 | 459 | 13·5 | 4,418 | 10·9 | 3,404 | 9·0 |
| District | 44 | 5·5 | 44 | 5·2 | 60 | 6·0 | 10 | 0·9 | 2 | 0·2 |
| Circle and Hammersmith | 0 | 0·0 | 0 | 0·0 | 0 | 0·0 | 755 | 6·7 | 825 | 8·0 |
| Jubilee and East London | 77 | 33·8 | 111 | 46·3 | 53 | 18·4 | 595 | 16·9 | 254 | 7·8 |
| Metropolitan | 39 | 3·7 | 43 | 3·8 | 76 | 5·7 | 1,167 | 7·3 | 1,080 | 7·2 |
| Northern | 198 | 9·1 | 217 | 9·5 | 214 | 7·8 | 2,552 | 7·8 | 1,389 | 4·5 |
| Piccadilly | 195 | 11·9 | 197 | 11·5 | 203 | 9·8 | 1,874 | 7·6 | 2,338 | 10·0 |
| Victoria | 36 | 3·2 | 109 | 9·1 | 141 | 9·8 | 1,428 | 7·9 | 1,371 | 7·6 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will publish a table showing for each London underground line and for each four-week period
Cost
| |
| Baker Tilly (support for client side) | 26 |
| Capita (support for client side) | 18 |
| Impact Plus (support for client side) | 9 |
Pelican And Zebra Crossings
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the safety benefits of marking the road at the sides at pelican crossings; and what plans he has to introduce such markings.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: Pelican crossings are required to have the familiar ziz-zag markings. We are not at present considering the introduction of any further marking.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the relative safety benefits of pelican crossings and zebra crossings.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: Research conducted by the Transport Research Laboratory has shown that although accident rates vary from site to site, the average rates for pelican and zebra crossings are similar overall.
London Underground
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) if he will publish a table showing for each London underground line and for each four-week period between 1 January and 24 June the number of (i) crimes of violence, (ii) robbery and (iii) other offences; and if he will make a statement;(2) if he will publish a table showing for each London underground line and for each four-week period between 1 January and 24 June the number and percentage of escalators out of service; and if he will make a statement.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: The information is not available in exactly the form requested. The table shows the number and percentage of escalators out of service between 1 January 1994 to 31 March 1994. From 1 April 1994 London Underground's target for escalator performance has been changed to measure hours out of service across the whole service day, and this is reflected in the figures quoted from 1 April. Data are not available for June 1994.between 1 January and 24 June the number of incidents, including cancellations, which resulted in a headway of more than 20 minutes; and how many of these were attributable.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: This information is not available in exactly the form requested. The table shows the number of major delays to service for each accounting period between January and May 1994.
| London Underground Limited | ||||||
| Attributable and non-attributable major train service delays | ||||||
| Period 11 | Period 12 | Period 13 | Period 1 | Period 2 | ||
| Line | 1 January 1994 to 29 January 1994 | 30 January 1994 to 26 February 1994 | 27 February 1994 to 31 March 1994 | 1 April 1994 to 30 April 1994 | 1 May 1994 to 28 May 1994 | Total |
| Attributable delays | ||||||
| Bakerloo | 11 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 41 |
| Central | 27 | 24 | 27 | 43 | 44 | 165 |
| District | 6 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 4 | 32 |
| Circle and Hammersmith | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 20 |
| Jubilee and East London | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 14 |
| Metropolitan | 6 | 13 | 18 | 12 | 21 | 70 |
| Northern | 4 | 9 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 37 |
| Piccadilly | 9 | 3 | 4 | 20 | 15 | 51 |
| Victoria | 2 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 20 |
| TOTAL | 67 | 69 | 89 | 115 | 110 | 450 |
| Non-attributable delays | ||||||
| Bakerloo | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| Central | 12 | 11 | 13 | 23 | 17 | 76 |
| District | 5 | 6 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 49 |
| Circle and Hammersmith | 5 | 4 | 9 | 14 | 10 | 42 |
| Jubilee and East London | 9 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 34 |
| Metropolitan | 14 | 14 | 17 | 25 | 24 | 94 |
| Northern | 13 | 10 | 13 | 14 | 9 | 59 |
| Piccadilly | 11 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 12 | 50 |
| Victoria | 3 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 25 |
| TOTAL | 76 | 65 | 71 | 117 | 112 | 441 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will publish a table showing for each London underground line, and for each four-week period between 1 January and 24 June the number and length of station closures (a) exceeding 20 minutes during the usual period for passenger travel, (b) exceeding one hour during the usual period for passenger travel, (c) exceeding one day, (d) exceeding one week and (e) exceeding one month which were attributable to (i) train breakdowns, (ii) signal failures, (iii) track or points failures, (iv) derailments or collisions, (v) leaves on the line, (vi) staff shortages, (vii) adverse weather conditions, excluding leaves on the line and (viii) bomb alerts.
| London Underground Limited: Station closures attributable to staff shortages | ||||||||||
| Period 11 | Period 12 | Period 13 | Period 1 | Period 2 | ||||||
| 1 January 1994 to 29 January 1994 | 30 January 1994 to 26 February 1994 | 27 February 1994 to 31 March 1994 | 1 April 1994 to 30 April 1994 | 1 May 1994 to 28 May 1994 | ||||||
| Line | Over 20 minutes | Over one hour | Over 20 minutes | Over one hour | Over 20 minutes | Over one hour | Over 20 minutes | Over one hour | Over 20 minutes | Over one hour |
| Bakerloo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Central | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| District | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 |
| Circle and Hammersmith | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jubilee and East London | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Metropolitan | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Northern | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Piccadilly | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Victoria | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 17 | 10 |
For the last three periods of the 1993–94 financial year, a major delay to service is defined as a delay of 20 minutes or more; since the beginning of 1994–95, only delays over 15 minutes have been measured by London Underground—in line with the current threshold for refunds under the LUL customer charter. No data are yet available for June 1994.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: This information is not available in the form requested. The tables show station closures over 20 minutes but not more than one hour, and over one hour, caused by staff shortages (vi) and security alerts (viii)—this does not include station closures caused by individual suspect packages. Information on (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), and (vii) is not collected by London Underground—it is extremely rare for a station to be closed for any of these reasons. Data are not collected in the form requested for closures in excess of one hour, and figures are not yet available for June 1994.
London Underground Limited: Station closures attributable to security alerts
| ||||||||||
Period 11
| Period 12
| Period 13
| Period 1
| Period 2
| ||||||
1 January 1994 to 29 January 1994
| 30 January 1994 to 26 February 1994
| 27 February 1994 to 31 March 1994
| 1 April 1994 to 30 April 1994
| 1 May 1994 to 28 May 1994
| ||||||
Line
| Over 20 minutes
| Over one hour
| Over 20 minutes
| Over one hour
| Over 20 minutes
| Over one hour
| Over 20 minutes
| Over one hour
| Over 20 minutes
| Over one hour
|
| Bakerloo | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Central | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| District | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Circle and Hammersmith | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jubilee and East London | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Metropolitan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Northern | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Piccadilly | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Victoria | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will publish a table showing for each London underground line and for each four-week period between 1 January and 24 June the number and length of (a) attributable station closures, (b) non-attributable station closures, (c) exceeding 20 minutes during the usual period for passenger travel, (d) exceeding one hour during the usual period for passenger travel, (e) exceeding one day, (f) exceeding one week and (g) exceeding one month; which stations, closed during the period, have yet to be reopened; when each closed station will re-open; and if he will make a statement.
| London Underground Limited: Attributable and non attributable station closures exceeding 20 minutes | ||||||||||
| Period 11 | Period 12 | Period 13 | Period 1 | Period 2 | ||||||
| 1 January 1994 to 29 January 1994 | 30 January 1994 to 26 February 1994 | 27 February 1994 to 31 March 1994 | 1 April 1994 to 30 April 1994 | 1 May 1994 to 28 May 1994 | ||||||
| Line | Attributable | Non attributable | Attributable | Non attributable | Attributable | Non attributable | Attributable | Non attributable | Attributable | Non attributable |
| Bakerloo | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Central | 3 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 16 |
| District | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Circle and Hammersmith | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Jubilee and East London | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Metropolitan | 3 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 6 |
| Northern | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 4 |
| Piccadilly | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Victoria | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4 |
| London Underground Limited: Attributable and non attributable station closures exceeding one hour | ||||||||||
| Period 11 | Period 12 | Period 13 | Period 1 | Period 2 | ||||||
| 1 January 1994 to 29 January 1994 | 30 January 1994 to 26 February 1994 | 27 February 1994 to 31 March 1994 | 1 April 1994 to 30 April 1994 | 1 May 1994 to 28 May 1994 | ||||||
| Line | Attributable | Non attributable | Attributable | Non attributable | Attributable | Non attributable | Attributable | Non attributable | Attributable | Non attributable |
| Bakerloo | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Central | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 9 | 4 |
| District | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Circle and Hammersmith | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jubilee and East London | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Metropolitan | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Northern | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Piccadilly | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Victoria | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
A38
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he hopes to announce his Department's preferred route for the A38 trunk road improvement between Saltash and Trerulefoot.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: I expect to announce our preferred route for this scheme in the autumn.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: The information is not available in the form requested. The tables show attributable and non-attributable station closures over 20 minutes but not more than one hour, and over one hour. No stations were closed for more than one day with the exception of Mornington Crescent on the Northern line, which has been closed by London underground for refurbishment and is not included in the tables. No data are yet available for June 1994.
Coastguards
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list the numbers and responsibilities of the auxiliary coastguards assigned to each Coastguard Agency office.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: A total of 3,515 auxiliary coastguards are assigned to the Coastguard Agency. The table gives a breakdown by rescue centre of numbers of auxiliaries and their responsibilities.
| District | Coastal Response Team | Operations Room Assistance | Other |
| Falmouth | 240 | 31 | 4 |
| Brixham | 157 | 15 | 4 |
| Portland | 147 | 20 | 4 |
| Shetland | 114 | 17 | 2 |
| Pentland | 188 | 18 | 2 |
| Aberdeen | 165 | 15 | 3 |
| Forth | 99 | 9 | 2 |
| Tyne Tees | 115 | 15 | 2 |
| Humber | 145 | 18 | 2 |
| Yarmouth | 110 | 20 | 3 |
| Clyde | 155 | 12 | 2 |
| Oban | 171 | 15 | 1 |
| Belfast | 92 | 16 | 1 |
| Stornoway | 141 | 19 | 2 |
| Solent | 143 | 9 | 2 |
| Dover | 91 | 28 | 3 |
| Thames | 119 | 22 | 5 |
| Swansea | 222 | 23 | 3 |
| Milford Haven | 162 | 22 | 3 |
| Holyhead | 154 | 13 | 1 |
| Liverpool | 161 | 14 | 2 |
| Total | 3,091 | 371 | 53 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what was the frequency with which auxiliary coastguards have been called out in the year to July 1994; how many were called out; and what was the nature and location of the incident in each case.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: The number of incidents to which auxiliary coastguards were called out during the period 1 July 1993 to 26 June 1994 totals 6,807. To provide details of the number of auxiliaries involved; nature and location of each incident would be of disproportionate cost.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what percentage of the annual budget of the Coastguards Agency is spent on the remuneration of auxiliary coastguards.
[holding answer 28 June 1994]: Out of the Coastguard Agency's budget for the financial year 1994–95 of some £49.9 million, 3 per cent. has been set aside for the cost of allowances paid to auxiliary coastguards.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what was the total cost of auxiliary coastguards pay and allowances (a) excluding and (b) including training costs in each coastguard region in 1993–94; and what it is projected to be in 1994–95.
[holding answer 27 June 1994]: The following is the information:
| Regional Totals (a) and (b) Total Costs | ||
| Financial Year | Excluding Training £ | Including Training £ |
| Western Region | ||
| 1993–94 | 248,894 | 288,725 |
| 1994–95 | 221,285 | 275,000 |
Financial Year
| Excluding Training £
| Including Training £
|
Eastern Region
| ||
| 1993–94 | 164,200 | 191,264 |
| 1994–95 | 162,889 | 189,720 |
North and East of Scotland Region
| ||
| 1993–94 | 155,000 | 138,551 |
| 1994–95 | 181,261 | 159,551 |
West of Scotland and Northern Ireland Region
| ||
| 1993–94 | 192,900 | 229,703 |
| 1994–95 | 184,592 | 235,674 |
South Eastern Region
| ||
| 1993–94 | 230,817 | 245,716 |
| 1994–95 | 246,262 | 262,716 |
South Western Region
| ||
| 1993–94 | 341,884 | 315,935 |
| 1994–95 | 382,824 | 358,700 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many auxiliary coastguard (a) patrol hours and (b) training hours are expected to be worked in the current year in each coastguard district and each coastguard region.
[holding answer 27 June 1994]: The following is the information:
| Projected figures for financial year 1994–95 | ||
| District | Patrol hours | Training hours |
| Western Region | ||
| Swansea | 2,438 | 5,520 |
| Milford Haven | 1,998 | 3,680 |
| Holyhead | 3,325 | 3,325 |
| Liverpool | 7,638 | 3,540 |
| Total | 15,399 | 16,065 |
| Eastern Region | ||
| Yarmouth | 2,664 | 3,750 |
| Humber | 6,822 | 3,687 |
| Tyne Tees | 1,374 | 2,320 |
| Total | 10,860 | 9,757 |
| North and East of Scotland Region | ||
| Forth | 550 | 2,200 |
| Aberdeen | 1,100 | 3,910 |
| Pentland | 900 | 3,700 |
| Shetland | 170 | 2,110 |
| Total | 2,720 | 11,920 |
| West of Scotland and Northern Ireland Region | ||
| Belfast | 2,500 | 4,300 |
| Stornoway | 2,672 | 4,004 |
| Clyde | 468 | 6,807 |
| Oban | 1,728 | 3,414 |
| Total | 7,368 | 18,525 |
| South Eastern Region | ||
| Solent | 12,600 | 5,000 |
| Dover | 5,000 | 3,500 |
| Thames | 4,835 | 1,878 |
| Total | 22,435 | 10,378 |
| South Western Region | ||
| Falmouth | 8,770 | 7,075 |
| Brixham | 5,564 | 4,688 |
District
| Patrol hours
| Training hours
|
| Portland | 4,402 | 3,876 |
| Total | 18,736 | 15,639 |
Overseas Development Administration
Overseas Aid
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much the Government spent on assistance to developing countries and to countries in transition (a) in constant prices, (b) as a proportion of Government spending and (c) as a proportion of GNP in 1980, 1990, 1991 and 1992, taking account of
| United Kingdom gross official flows to developing countries (1 2) | ||||
| Cash terms £ million | (a) Constant prices (1992) £ million | (b) Per cent of General Government Spending | (c) Per cent of GNP | |
| Official development assistance | ||||
| 1980 | 866 | 1,790 | 0·83 | 0·43 |
| 1990 | 1,563 | 1,744 | 0·73 | 0·33 |
| 1991 | 1,901 | 1,985 | 0·83 | 0·38 |
| 1992 | 1,977 | 1,977 | 0·78 | 0·38 |
| of which: Loans/Subsidies3 | ||||
| 1980 | 74 | 154 | 0·07 | 0·04 |
| 1990 | 6 | 7 | 0·00 | 0·00 |
| 1991 | 24 | 25 | 0·01 | 0·00 |
| 1992 | 30 | 30 | 0·01 | 0·01 |
| Other official flows | ||||
| 1980 | 281 | 580 | 0·27 | 0·14 |
| 1990 | 386 | 431 | 0·18 | 0·08 |
| 1991 | 346 | 361 | 0·15 | 0·07 |
| 1992 | 252 | 252 | 0·10 | 0·05 |
| of which: Loans/Subsidies3 | ||||
| 1980 | 278 | 574 | 0·27 | 0·14 |
| 1990 | 386 | 431 | 0·18 | 0·08 |
| 1991 | 346 | 361 | 0·15 | 0·07 |
| 1992 | 252 | 252 | 0·10 | 0·05 |
| 1This excludes assistance to countries of central and eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, peace operations in developing countries and the cost of asylum seekers. | ||||
| 2Note that gross official flows do not include loan repayments. | ||||
| 3Includes interest stabilisation and subsidised loans. | ||||
| Other United Kingdom net official flows of assistance | ||||
| Cash terms £ million | (a) Constant prices (1992) £ million | (b) Per cent of General Government Spending | (c) Per cent of GNP | |
| United Kingdom official bilateral assistance to central and eastern Europe | ||||
| 1980 | 0 | 0 | 0·00 | 0·00 |
| 19901 | 69 | 78 | 0·03 | 0·01 |
| 1991 | 21 | 22 | 0·01 | 0·00 |
| 1992 | 28 | 28 | 0·01 | 0·01 |
| United Kingdom net official bilateral assistance to former Soviet Union | ||||
| 1980 | 0 | 0 | 0·00 | 0·00 |
| 1990 | 0 | 0 | 0·00 | 0·00 |
| 1991 | 4 | 5 | 0·00 | 0·00 |
| 1992 | 30 | 30 | 0·01 | 0·01 |
(i) official development aid, (ii) international environment policy (iii) peace operations in developing countries and countries in transition, (iv) reception of asylum seekers, (v) aid to central and eastern Europe, (vi) subsidies on loans to developing countries, and (vii) other forms of non-ODA assistance to developing countries.
The information is not available in the form requested. The best representation is shown in the table. Information on the value of peace operations and reception of asylum seekers is being provided in response to separate questions tabled by the hon. Member.
Cash terms £ million
| (a) Constant prices (1992) £ million
| (b) Per cent of General Government Spending
| (c) Per cent of GNP
| |
United Kingdom multilateral assistance to CEE/FSU
| ||||
| 1980 | 0 | 0 | 0·00 | 0·00 |
| 1990 | 0 | 0 | 0·00 | 0·00 |
| 1991 | 160 | 167 | 0·07 | 0·03 |
| 1992 | 135 | 135 | 0·05 | 0·03 |
Environmental protection2
| ||||
| 1980 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 1991–92 | 108 | 112 | 0·05 | 0·02 |
| 1992–93 | 124 | 124 | 0·05 | 0·02 |
n/a=Not available.
1 Includes contribution towards currency stabilisation fund for Poland of about £62 million.
2 Please see PQ 152 for an explanation of these figures. Figures for 1991–92 and 1992–93 are given in constant 1992–93 prices.
Development Aid
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much in cash terms and constant prices the Government spent in 1980, 1990, 1991 and 1992 on development aid to developing countries.
Expenditure details requested are as follows:
| United Kingdom Gross Official Development Assistance to Developing Countries1 | ||
| Official Development Assistance | Cash Terms £ million | Constant Prices (1992) £ million |
| 1980 | 866 | 1,790 |
| 1990 | 1,563 | 1,744 |
| 1991 | 1,901 | 1,985 |
| 1992 | 1,977 | 1,977 |
| 1Note that gross official flows do not include loan repayments. | ||
Kenya
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of whether British aid projects have been affected adversely by ethnic clashes in Kenya; and what representations he has made on these matters to the Kenyan Government.
No British aid projects have been directly affected by the clashes. We have registered our concerns over the violence. We are supporting victims of the clashes by funding the programme launched jointly by the Government of Kenya, the United Nations development programme, donors and non-governmental organisations.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what are the good governance issues that he takes into account in considering aid projects for Kenya.
Our programme aid, in Kenya as elsewhere, depends not only on economic reform but on a conducive political environment, with effective action to improve open and accountable government, including dealing with corruption, reducing tribal tensions and enhancing press freedom. We are, through our project aid—for example, support for the legal sector—seeking to enhance the processes of transparency and accountability.
International Environment Protection
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much in cash terms and constant prices the Government spent in 1980, 1990, 1991 and 1992 on international environmental protection.
Figures are not available for 1980 and 1990. Preliminary data derived from a pilot statistical analysis of bilateral projects show that expenditure on projects that had environmental protection as an objective was £108 million in 1991–92 and £124 million in 1992–93, in cash terms. In constant 1992–93 prices, this represents £112 million and £124 million respectively.The analysis covers approximately 57 per cent. of all bilateral expenditure. It does not include multilateral aid.
Central And Eastern Europe
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much in cash terms and constant prices, the Government spent in 1980, 1990, 1991 and 1992 on aid to central and eastern Europe.
Expenditure details requested are as follows:
| £ million | ||
| Year | Cash terms | Constant prices (1992) |
| United Kingdom net official bilateral assistance to central and eastern Europe | ||
| 1980 | 0 | 0 |
| 11990 | 69 | 78 |
| 1991 | 21 | 22 |
| 1992 | 28 | 28 |
| United Kingdom net official bilateral assistance to former Soviet Union | ||
| 1980 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4 | 5 |
| 1992 | 30 | 30 |
| United Kingdom multilateral assistance to CEE/FSU | ||
| 1980 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 160 | 167 |
| 1992 | 135 | 135 |
| 1Includes a contribution towards the Currency Stabilisation Fund for Poland of approximately £62 million. | ||
Developing Countries (Loans)
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much in cash terms and constant prices the Government spent in 1980, 1990, 1991 and 1992 on subsidies on loans to developing countries (a) included in ODA expenditure and (b) not included in ODA expenditure.
Details of the value of interest stabilisation and subsidised loans to developing countries, are as follows:
| United Kingdom gross official flows to developing countries1 | ||
| Interest Stabilisation and Subsidised Loans | Cash Terms | Constant Prices (1992) £ million |
| (a) Included in Official Development Assistance2 | ||
| 1980 | 74 | 154 |
| 1990 | 6 | 7 |
Interest Stabilisation and Subsidised Loans
| Cash Terms
| Constant Prices (1992) £ million
|
| 1991 | 24 | 25 |
| 1992 | 30 | 30 |
(b) Not included in Official Development Assistance3
| ||
| 1980 | 278 | 574 |
| 1990 | 386 | 431 |
| 1991 | 346 | 361 |
| 1992 | 252 | 252 |
1Note that gross official flows do not include loan repayments. | ||
2This comprises grants for interest subsidies included in Associated Financing packages and bilateral loans. | ||
3This comprises subsidies to national private exporters and investors, loans to national private investors and other bilateral securities and claims. | ||