To ask the Chairman of the Administration Committee if he has considered an application for an exhibition relating to paper week to be displayed in the Upper Waiting Hall.

I understand that, under procedures agreed by the Administration Committee, arrangements have been made for the exhibition to be held in the Upper Waiting Hall from Monday 30 October to Friday 3 November 1995.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations he has made to the French Government about the attack on the Rainbow Warrior; and if he will make a statement on his Department's policy in respect of this incident. [34156]

No representations have been made to the French Government about the Rainbow Warrior action. We have however reminded the French authorities of their obligations in respect of any UK nationals who might be detained.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he expects the intergovernmental conference reflections group to discuss the reform of the common agricultural policy. [33609]

The IGC study group has not yet discussed the common agricultural policy, and may not do so in any details. The 1992 MacSharry reforms demonstrated that the problems of the CAP stem less from the provisions of the treaty than from the policy which has been developed on the basis of those provisions. We shall continue to work for reform of the CAP in the appropriate fora.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to his answer of 6 July, Official Report, column 326, if he will provide a breakdown of the figures for vehicles bought for posts abroad, specifying where possible the post and type of vehicle. [34290]

I shall arrange for the information requested to be placed in the Library of the House shortly.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the United Kingdom consulates and embassies in the south Pacific region, indicating the number of diplomatic staff employed at each location (a) currently and (b) 10 years ago. [34186]

The number of UK-based staff slots at each post in the south Pacific region is as follows:

Post	1995	1985
Canberra	28	48
Sydney	4	4
Perth	2	2
Brisbane	2	2
Melbourne	2	2
Wellington	14	15
Auckland	2	4
Port Moresby	4	4
Suva	4	6
Nuku'Alofa	2	2
Vila	2	2
Honiara	2	2
Tarawa	0	1

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to the answer of the Secretary of State for the Home Department of 29 June, Official Report, column 765, when a decision is to be taken by the post in Islamabad, in the case of Mrs. Quereshi Bibi—ref. BV100/25109; and if he will make a statement. [34319]

I have asked the high commission at Islamabad for details and will arrange for the hon. Member to receive a substantive reply from the migration and visa correspondence unit as soon as possible.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs which firms have won computer consultancy contracts from his Department and its agencies over the last five years; and what is the number of contracts per firm. [33893]

[holding answer 12 July 1995]: The FCO is involved in a number of strategic projects to develop and enhance its communications and information handling facilities. As such, it has dealt with many different software suppliers and consultants. The information is not readily available and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much his Department and its agencies have spent on computer consultancy in each of the last five years; and what is the expected expenditure over the next five years. [33862]

[holding answer 12 July 1995]: The FCO spend on computer consultancy over the last five years was:

• 1990–91: £3,985,000
• 1991–92: £4,074,000
• 1992–93: £4,527,000
• 1993–94: £5,076,000
• 1994–95: £4,984,000
• 1995–96: £6,300,000
• 1996–97: £6,100,000
• 1997–98: £5,700,000
• 1998–99: £5,700,000
• 1999–2000: £6,000,000

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what was the outcome of the triennial review of Her Majesty's Land Registry. [34822]

Her Majesty's Land Registry, a separate department of Government since 1862, was established as an executive agency in July 1990 and a Government trading fund in April 1993. Under its statutory powers it guarantees and grants legal title to property rights in England and Wales and provides the statutory machinery for the creation and transfer of these secured rights. The department, wholly financed from fees paid by those using its services, makes no call on public funds.An evaluation report, the results of which were made known to the House on 14 July 1994, concluded that the Land Registry had benefited considerably from its move to agency status. It had been a major enabling factor in promoting sound public sector management. By the achievement of progressively improving performance targets and a successful computerisation programme, the Land Registry has made a major contribution to the simplification of conveyancing in England and Wales, particularly through the development of faster and easier access to the public land register. It reduced fees by 10.6 per cent. in October 1994.In order to supplement this evaluation, consultants were appointed to carry out a "prior options" review to consider a range of options for involving the private sector in delivering the services provided by the Land Registry. They confirmed that the present status arrangements would ensure the continuing credibility of the Land Registry consistent with a cost effective, high-quality service likely to result in lower land registration fees to the public.The consultants identified scope for private sector partnerships in a number of important Land Registry initiatives. This includes further development of electronic access to the public land register, taking forward the national land information system promoted by the citizen's charter, and the potential conversion of the title plans of England and Wales to computer format. Consultants also saw scope for the Land Registry, in partnership, providing specialist advice to those overseas Governments seeking to establish stable private property rights, secured lending and inexpensive systems of property transfer.The Lord Chancellor has concluded that it is right for Her Majesty's Land Registry to continue as an executive agency and trading fund. The Land Registry will concentrate on its existing plans to further simplify and reduce the cost of conveyancing in England and Wales by meeting the financial, productivity and developmental targets set for the next five years and by continuing its full market testing programme, all set out in its corporate and efficiency plans. The registry will also actively pursue private sector partnerships for the important initiatives identified. It will continue to capitalise on the scope for contracting out where this contributes to its strategic aims and objectives. A new framework document is being drawn up to cover the next five years and on completion will be placed in the Library of the House.

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department how much he estimates it will cost to extend legal aid to qualifying persons bringing personal injury claims up to the value of £10,000 on the proposed civil litigation fasttrack. [34245]

Until there has been an opportunity for the Lord Chancellor to consider the proposals in greater detail, it will not be possible to make an assessment of the potential cost or savings to the legal aid fund.

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department how much he expects the Legal Aid Board to save if children are no longer able to be parties to legal actions brought on their behalf against the decisions of local education authorities. [34242]

No estimate has been made.

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what factors led to the delay in the Legal Aid Board sanctioning of funds for the appeal to the High Court in the case of Emma Van de Velde v. Special Needs Tribunal. [34246]

The administration of civil legal aid is the responsibility of the Legal Aid Board. However, I understand that both of Miss Van de Velde's applications were dealt with promptly by the board; the first within 12 working days, and the second, for an emergency certificate, within 24 hours.

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what plans he has to (a) estimate and (b) publish the potential cost savings to the legal aid fund to be made from raising the upper limit on small claims from £1,000 to £3,000. [34243]

The Lord Chancellor has announced his intention to implement Lord Woolf's recommendations that the small claims limit should be raised to £3,000 for all claims except those for personal injury. Lord Woolf's recommendations is based on the desirability of making the less formal and more affordable small claims procedure available to more litigants. There are likely to be some small savings to the legal aid fund from increasing the limit. The level of such savings is still being assessed. I will write to the hon. Member when this work is completed.

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what estimate he has made of the cost of implementing Lord Woolf's proposals for civil justice reform, with particular reference to (a) those relating to the greater use of information technology by judges and the Court Service, (b) a greater case management role for judges, (c) the appointment of a head of civil justice and (d) enhanced judicial training. [34244]

Until there has been an opportunity for the Lord Chancellor to consider the proposals in greater detail, it will not be possible to provide any cost estimates.

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what was the average time his Department took to respond to a letter from an hon. Member before the establishment of the Courts Agency; and what is the average time taken by the agency to respond to a letter from an hon. Member in the first three months of its operation. [33166]

The information requested in the first part of the question could not be provided without disproportionate cost. However I refer the hon. Member to the Official Report for 18 April 1995, column 22 in which the Under-Secretary of State at the Office of Public Service and Science, replying to a question from the hon. Member for Chorley (Mr. Dover) said that in 1994, my Department replied to 83 per cent. of correspondence from right hon. and hon. Members within its 20 working day target. The second part of the question, concerning the average time taken by the Court Service to respond to a letter from an hon. Member, concerns a specific operational question upon which the chief executive of the court service is best placed to reply. I have accordingly asked him to do so.

To ask the Lord President of the Council how many staff in his Department or its agencies have (a) declared any company shareholdings they hold or (b) been advised to dispose of shareholdings in the last five years, indicating the companies concerned.

The answer in both cases is none.

To ask the Lord President of the Council what will be the involvement of the Deputy Prime Minister in the work of his office.

I refer the hon. Gentleman to the answer given by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister to the Member for Pembroke (Mr. Ainger) on 11 July, Official Report, column 496–97.

To ask the Lord President of the Council if he will list (a) details of all overseas trips made by him, or ministerial colleagues in his Department, paid for wholly or partly from public funds and (b) the purpose, destination and duration of such overseas trips, which officials accompanied him and the total cost in each case, including that of officials, to public funds for each year since 1992.

I visited Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong from 5 to 24 September 1992. The principal purpose of the visits to Australia and New Zealand was to meet my counterparts and to exchange experience in the field of procedural reforms, preparation and scrutiny of legislation etc. The principal purpose of the visit to Hong Kong was to study measures against drug misuse, in the context of my chairmanship of the Ministerial Committee on Drug Misuse; this visit was however curtailed by the recall of Parliament that year. The only official accompanying me was a private secretary. The cost to public funds was £20,904.My right hon. and noble Friend Lord Wakeham, when Lord Privy Seal, visited Dubai from 24 to 26 April 1994 to open the "Britain in the Gulf' exhibition. The only official accompanying him was a private secretary. The cost to public funds was £2,619.My right hon. and noble Friend the Lord Privy Seal accompanied His Royal Highness the Duke of York to the French Government's 50th anniversary commemoration of the liberation of southern France from 13 to 15 August 1994. The only official accompanying him was a private secretary. Travel was in an aircraft of the queen's flight. There was no further cost to public funds.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assistance has been given by (a) his Department and (b) EU aid to establish or develop commodity exchanges for cocoa, coffee or sugar in developing countries; and if he will list the date, location and value of any aid projects of this type approved by his Department or the EU in the past five years. [34301]

We have supported a number of commodity-based projects in developing countries, bilaterally, through the EC and through the common fund for commodities. The objectives have included assistance with production, diversification and marketing, but the development of commodity exchanges in developing countries has not, to date, been one of our principal aims. A list of bilateral projects and those supported through the command fund for commodities in the field is being placed in the Library of the House. We are investigating whether a similar list exists for EC-funded projects.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list all legislation under which unauthorised sex shops and sex cinemas can be prosecuted; and how many prosecutions under each provision there have been in the last five years. [32966]

The legislation under which unauthorised sex shops and sex cinemas can be prosecuted is the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982. The relevant provisions are as follows:

Schedule 3, paragraph 20(a), (b), (c) and (d)—offences relating to operating a sex establishment without or in contravention of the terms of a licence.

Schedule 3, paragraph 21—making a false statement in a connection with the application, renewal or transfer of a licence.

Under Schedule 3, paragraph 22(1) a person guilty of an offence under paragraphs 20 or 21 shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £20,000.

Under schedule 3, paragraph 22(2) a person who fails to comply with paragraph 14(1) (display of copy of licence and standard conditions) shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

Schedule 3, paragraph 23—offences relating to the admission or employment of persons under 18. A person guilty of an offence under this paragraph shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £20,000.

Schedule 3, paragraph 24(6)—refusal to permit a constable or authorised local authority officer to exercise powers provided under paragraph 24. For every such refusal a person shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale.

In 1989, there was one prosecution under schedule 3 paragraph 20(a) of the Act. However it should be noted that statistics of court proceedings are based on returns made by the police to the Home Office and although these include offences where there has been no police involvement, such as those prosecutions instigated by Government Departments, local authorities, as in this case, and private organisations and individuals, the reporting of these types of offences is known to be incomplete.Information collected from 1990 onwards does not identify individual offences committed under this specific Act from other summary offences.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many officers in each police service are devoted to investigating reports from banks of possible money laundering. [33119](2) how many reports the National Criminal Intelligence Service received from banks about possible money laundering in each of the last three years; [33120]

Investigation of possible cases of money laundering is a matter primarily for the police and HM Customs and Excise. The role of the financial intelligence and money laundering section of the National Criminal Intelligence Service is to research and develop disclosures made to it and to enhance their intelligence value before dissemination to the appropriate law enforcement agency. The cost of the section is estimated as:

• 1993–94: £450,000
• 1994–95: £460,000
• 1995–96: £530,000 (estimated)

As at 1 July 1995, there were 13 staff employed in the section.The number of disclosures received by NCIS from banks and other financial institutions in each of the last three years is as follows:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what has been the total time by which court proceedings have been delayed because of late delivery of prisoners by Securicor to courts in London; [32536](2) what has been the cost to public funds of delays to court proceedings caused by late delivery of prisoners by Securicor to courts in London; [32538](3) what sanctions he has in respect of Securicor's failure to deliver prisoners to the Court of Appeal on time; and what action he plans to take; [32540](4) how many prisoners Securicor has escorted to court since the service was contracted out; and how many of these have been delivered to court late, or within so little time to spare that court proceedings have been delayed. [32542]

[holding answer 6 July 1995]: Responsibility for these matters has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what action he has taken to monitor the workings of the new undertaking employers are required to sign when bringing their overseas domestic workers into the United Kingdom; [33991](2) what action he has taken to monitor the workings of the new undertaking employers are required to sign when bringing their overseas domestic workers into Scotland. [33992]

Employers are required to sign an undertaking to maintain and accommodate their domestic workers satisfactorily, including the provision of a separate bedroom, when applications for entry clearance are made. In the case of domestic workers who come for longer than a visit, when applications for further leave to remain are made, inquiries are made that the conditions of the scheme, including adequate maintenance and accommodation, continue to be met.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his answer of 6 July, Official Report, columns 349–50 if he will give details of each of the incidents involving a reactivated firearm. [34238]

I am now aware of 20 incidents since the beginning of 1993. I understand that two were murders, seven others resulted in a non-fatal injury and four involved shots being fired, apparently without causing injury, in the course of crime. In the remaining seven incidents, there was no injury or evidence that they were associated with any other crime. Twelve of the incidents are reported as having taken place in the Greater Manchester police force area, two each in Mersyside, West Yorkshire and the West Midlands and one each in Lancashire and the Metropolitan police district.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many homicides involving (a) shotguns and (b) other firearms have taken place in each police force area in each of the last five years; and how many of the victims in each case were women; [34157](2) how many thefts of

The information requested is not immediately available and I will write to the hon. Member.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when he will lay before Parliament the sixth annual report of the Firearms Consultative Committee. [34716]

I have today placed a copy of the annual report of the Firearms Consultative Committee in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the United Kingdom post in Islamabad asked the Home Office to arrange for the sponsor of Mrs. Rehana Fiaz (Ref.GV 100/27227) to be interviewed; where and when the interview is to take place; and if he will make a statement. [34300]

The request from the British high commission in Islamabad for an interview of Mrs. Rehana Fiaz's sponsor was received by the Home Office on 15 December 1994. Arrangements have been made to interview the sponsor on 8 August at the immigration office at Leeds/Bradford airport.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what proposals the Government have to improve pre-trial procedures in the Crown Court. [34715]

The Government share the view of the Royal Commission on criminal justice that further measures are needed to improve the effectiveness of pre-trial hearings in the Crown Court, to enable issues to be clarified and resolved in advance of the trial.To achieve this, we propose providing for a power for judges to make binding rulings before the start of the trial, and for an extension of the existing system of preparatory hearings, currently held in serious fraud cases, to other potentially long or complex cases. These proposals are contained in a consultation paper on improving the effectiveness of pre-trial hearings in the Crown Court—which we are publishing today.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what measures his Department are undertaking to limit the number of vehicles stolen. [33577]

Vehicle crime decreased by almost 2 per cent. in 1993 and by 10 per cent. in 1994. This downward trend is encouraging and it would appear that the measures taken by the Department are having an effect.The Department is addressing vehicle crime in a number of ways, and the following are just a few examples of the work being done by the Home Office.The prevention of car crime was a central feature of our 1992 car crime prevention year campaign which showed what could be done if car owners, the police, motor manufacturers, the insurance industry, motoring organisations and car park operators made a concerted effort to tackle the problem together.The Home Office public relations branch produces a range of crime prevention advice leaflets covering crimes committed against different types of vehicles.Home Office Ministers have asked manufacturers to introduce effective immobilisation systems, deadlocking, and visible vehicle identification numbers; and the Home Office police scientific and development branch has provided free technical advice to manufacturers on how to do this.The Home Office has worked closely with the Department of Transport to ensure that the British standards on vehicle security we wanted were incorporated into the compulsory EC directive 74/61.The Department supports the work of SOLD SECURE, an Association of Chief Police Officers-backed organisation which tests the effectiveness of vehicle security devices for older cars and publicises details of approved products; and also the Vehicle Security Installation Board, which publishes lists of approved installers of security products.The Home Office also supports schemes designed to prevent young people turning to crime, and a great deal is being done in this area through motor projects and other diversionary schemes.The Home Office has already taken action to deal with offenders. The Aggravated Vehicle-Taking Act 1992 demonstrates our determination to deal with the menace posed by those who take cars and cause damage, injury or death.Work to reduce vehicle crime is informed by regular Home Office research; and is taken forward by the vehicle crime prevention group whose members are drawn from the police, motor manufacturers, dealers, the insurance industry, motoring organisations and Government Departments.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many vehicles were stolen in the United Kingdom for each of the last 10 years. [33576]

The available information relates to offences of theft of a motor vehicle recorded by the police in England and Wales. This information is published in table 2.19 of "Criminal Statistics, England and Wales, 1993" (Cm 2680) and in table 6 of Home Office statistical bulletin 5/95; copies of both these publications are in the Library. Information on Scotland and Northern Ireland are matters for the Secretary of State for each Department.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many asylum seekers have committed suicide in prisons or detention centres in each of the last three calendar years and in the current year to date; [33347](2) how many asylum seekers are recorded as having committed suicide when not in detention, but after rejection of their asylum applications, in each of the last three calendar years and in the current year to date. [33348]

No person who had sought asylum has committed suicide in a prison or detention centre in the last three calendar years or in the current year to date. Information is not available about people who have committed suicide after an application for asylum has been refused and who are not detained.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what method was used to monitor the results of the "No Self-Completion Questionnaire" exercise undertaken by the asylum division of his Department in recent months; what were the results of the exercise as regards time taken to process decisions and the quality of those decisions compared to cases dealt with under normal procedures; how many of the cases decided have been finally determined after appeals brought to the Immigration Appeals Authority; and if he will deposit a record on the exercise in the Library. [33346]

I am placing in the Library a brief report on this exercise; which includes details of the monitoring arrangements used. It produced a direct saving in the screening process for applications of between four and six weeks. All six appeals against refusal heard during the period of the exercise were dismissed: a further analysis will be carried out when more appeals have been heard.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will estimate the cost of employing consultants in connection with privatisation programmes in which his Department has been engaged since 1980. [33461]

Expenditure incurred on employing consultants was £2,160,000, excluding value added tax, in respect of the privatisation of National Transcommunications Ltd. and £784,000, excluding value added tax, in respect of the privatisation of DTELS—formerly the Home Office Directorate of Telecommunications.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the total amount spent on driver training by each police force area in England and Wales for each year since 1990. [33487]

Information collected centrally is related to the number of days spent on all aspects of driver and traffic training, which includes training in matters such as traffic law, road safety, speed enforcement and accident investigation as well as driving courses. Details are set out in the table. Information about training costs is also given but is incomplete.

Total training days—driver and traffic training
Force	1990–91	1991–92	1992–93
Avon and Somerset	6,710	6,736	6,829
Bedfordshire	2,562	2,414	2,555
Cambridgeshire	587	1,074	2,053
Cheshire	3,547	1,843	1,429
City of London	952	697	706
Cleveland	2,259	743	618
Cumbria	1,496	1,383	1,416
Derbyshire	4,511	2,287	2,795
Devon and Cornwall	3,652	4,254	3,648
Dorset	1,524	1,804	1,603
Durham	2,135	2,643	2,136
Dyfed Powys	1,614	1,397	1,746
Essex	6,535	7,813	7,840
Gloucestershire	1,762	1,465	1,282
Greater Manchester	12,431	10,345	9,062
Gwent	1,513	1,291	n/a
Hampshire	3,944	3,407	n/a
Hertfordshire	3,698	2,160	3,260
Humberside	2,490	3,158	—
Kent	4,620	2,643	3,008
Lancashire	2,675	3,321	3,003
Leicestershire	2,270	3,011	2,521
Lincolnshire	1,617	1,675	1,562
Merseyside	5,504	6,608	3,601
Norfolk	2,652	2,406	1,887
Northamptonshire	2,466	2,389	2,130
Northumbria	5,178	4,410	4,535
North Wales	1,351	1,325	1,101
North Yorkshire	2,345	2,944	2,754
Nottinghamshire	4,030	3,151	2,477
South Wales	2,490	4,341	4,982
South Yorkshire	3,756	3,570	4,396
Staffordshire	4,677	4,982	3,936
Suffolk	1,715	2,115	1,916
Surrey	2,889	3,674	—
Sussex	4,465	6,843	—
Thames Valley	7,948	7,427	5,585
Warwickshire	1,153	1,678	969
West Mercia	2,236	3,375	4,014
West Midlands	13,016	9,980	10,777
West Yorkshire	4,532	4,304	4,920
Wiltshire	2,771	3,332	2,638
Metropolitan	28,149	31,783	33,886

Training costs—driver and traffic training
£
Force	1990–91	1991–92	1992–93
Avon and Somerset	1,494,009	1,321,638	1,453,522
Bedfordshire	—	590,523	677,496
Cambridgeshire	—	361.942	524,857
Cheshire	509,266	376,253	330,990
City of London	—	—	—
Cleveland	467,000	273,000	—
Cumbria	305,436	135,649	259,091
Derbyshire	929,463	—	577,794
Devon and Cornwall	655,897	855,765	877,513
Dorset	—	419,892	—
Durham	—	—	—
Dyfed Powys	263,400	231,600	—
Essex	1,964,589	1,300,000	2,007,391
Gloucestershire	350,784	293,538	276,670
Greater Manchester	—	1,251,773	1,207,188

Training costs—driver and traffic training
£
Force	1990–91	1991–92	1992–93
Gwent	287,498	209,866	—
Hampshire	—	858,621	1,114,196
Hertfordshire	—	—	—
Humberside	520,000	258,000	—
Kent	1,048,039	875,336	1,185,687
Lancashire	—	914,666	—
Leicestershire	253,713	—	405,623
Lincolnshire	—	474,400	—
Merseyside	1,594,039	1,827,821	1,413,639
Norfolk	571,500	519,700	453,800
Northamptonshire	—	441,661	431,128
Northumbria	—	—	968,752
North Wales	—	—	121,569
North Yorkshire	433,570	533,890	550,200
Nottinghamshire	—	710,292	—
South Wales	644,808	840,145	961.465
South Yorkshire	—	—	—
Staffordshire	441,759	1,137,897	535,668
Suffolk	553,462	448	456,012
Surrey	864,700	969,000	1,002,000
Sussex	503,000	805,912	—
Thames Valley	—	1,761,828	1,380,992
Warwickshire	166,314	788,718	249,693
West Mercia	596,616	725,905	897,038
West Midlands	3,020,332	3,226,004	2,989,280
West Yorkshire	1,674,900	1,493,900	1,561,300
Wiltshire	47,620	303,448	392,890
Metropolitan	—	4,546,817	—

Figures for 1993–94 and 1994–95 are not yet available.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many staff are employed with the police (a) full time and (b) as part of their other duties to train traffic policemen in truck enforcement work. [33588]

The information requested is not available. Training for traffic officers concerned with the enforcement of legislation on goods vehicle safety is generally provided by police officers acting as instructors. We are not aware that any officers are employed solely for the purpose of providing this particular training.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department which police forces have traffic officers or special units dedicated to enforcing truck safety; and what are the numbers of police staff who are dedicated in this way (a) in total and (b) in each of the past 10 years. [33583]

The information requested is not available. Police officers assigned to traffic work are involved in many aspects of traffic law enforcement not solely the enforcement of goods vehicle safety legislation.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will define a "properly interested person" in cases involving deaths in custody. [33341]

No. Under the present law, the determination of a "properly interested person" under the Coroners Rules 1984 for the purposes of any inquest is a matter for the coroner. The circumstances in which persons may be interested in a particular case vary so considerably that I do not think that further definition is practicable.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what steps he is taking to compare the performance of the Immigration Service at the different ports of entry to the United Kingdom. [33840]

The National Audit Office report. "Entry into the United Kingdom"—HC204—made a number of recommendations about the development of an indicator system to compare the performance of the Immigration Service at individual ports of entry. All the recommendations are being carefully considered and as a first step the Immigration Service has made significant revisions to its management information system to facilitate better use and easier comparisons of performance indicators. Further work is continuing.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what action he is taking to improve passenger clearance times at ports of entry. [33839]

The Immigration Service has published service standards for passenger queuing times at all ports and airports, and monitoring exercises have shown that these standards have generally been achieved. Consistent with the need to apply effectively the immigration rules as set down by Parliament, the service seeks to introduce measures aimed at further improving this aspect of its work—often in co-operation with port operators and carrying companies. Recent initiatives include:

the introduction of new shift arrangements at certain ports to help match staff deployment more closely to predicted weight of arriving traffic, particularly during the early morning;

the development of fast track facilities at Heathrow terminals 3 and 4;

increased on-board coach clearance at Dover; and

special arrangements for tour groups at Heathrow terminal 4.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many staff were allocated to the charity commissioners' second inquiry into the Foundation for Business Responsibilities; how long they spent making their inquiries; and what was the total number of man hours put into the investigation; [32057](2) pursuant to his answer of 18 May,

Details of persons written to or interviewed by the Charity Commission during an investigation are a matter for the Charity Commission. The commission's correspondence files are confidential, particularly those relating to investigations cases where disclosure may discourage third parties from providing information to the commission. Correspondence will not usually be disclosed without the authority of an order of the court or the consent of the correspondent.The commission's second inquiry was conducted by one member of staff who, over a period of four and a half months, spent a total of 22¼ hours on it. The investigator was supported at times by senior staff. The duration of this support was not recorded.During the course of the commission's investigation, the trustees of the Foundation for Business Responsibilities themselves acknowledged that some of the payments made by the foundation to Marketforce Communications were not justified having regard to the services provided by marketforce to the foundation. The commission was not party to any consideration of the factors leading to the trustees' decision.During the course of the commission's first inquiry, £98,987.96 was identified as being improperly paid to Marketforce Communications. The former director of the foundation, Michael Ivens, authorised the payments. He repaid the money to the charity.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement outlining how the bonds scheme for prison governors works. [32251]

Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what has been the number of home leaves of prison inmates that have been refused due to the fact that victims object to such home leave; and if he will make a statement. [31373]

Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) how many disability living allowance appeals were received by his Department concerning (a) a review requested within three months of the original decision and (b) a review requested at any time; and in each case, how many appeals were successful, in each of the years 1992–93, 1993–94 and 1994–95; [33031](2) how many claims for disability living allowance were received by his Department in each of the years 1992–93, 1993–94 and 1994–95; [33027](3) how many requests for a review within three months of a refusal to award disability living allowance were received by his Department in each of the years 1992–93, 1993–94 and 1994–95; how many of these requests were refused; and how many of the reviews resulted in the original decision being revised; [33029]

The information is not available in the format requested for all the questions. Available information is in the tables.

Disability living allowance claims and awards
Thousands
Number	1992–93	1993–94	1994–95
Claims received	744	435	504
Awards made	432	223	233

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is the latest monthly count of claimants drawing any one of the sickness, disability or disablement benefits. [33141]

The information is not available in the format requested. The available information is in the table:

Benefit	Numbers in receipt	Latest data
Attendance Allowance1	996,000	March1994
Disability Living Allowance2	1,541.000	May1995
Disability Working Allowance3	5,202	January 1995
Industrial Injuries Benefit4	209,000	April 1993
Invalidity Benefit5,12	1,580,000	April 1993
Pneumoconiosis, Byssinosis, and Miscellaneous Diseases Benefit Scheme6	331	June 1995
Reduced Earnings Allowance/Retirement Allowance7	155,000	April 1993
Sickness Benefit8 12	147,000	April 1993
Severe Disablement Allowance9	316,000	April 1993
War Disablement Benefit10	260,297	March 1995
Workmens Compensation Supplementation Scheme11	870	June 1995
Figures rounded to the nearest thousand other than those based on a 100 per cent. count of cases.
1. Based on 100 per cent. count of cases, adjusted by an annual sampling exercise.
2. Based on five per cent. sample.
3. Based on 100 per cent. count.
4. Rated up from ten per cent. sample with an allowance for late returns. The figure quoted related to the number of assessment in payment and not recipients. A person may be in receipt of more than one pension.
5. Based on one per cent. sample.
6. Based on 100 per cent. count of cases.
7. Rated up from a ten per cent. sample with an allowance for late returns. The figure quoted relates to the number of allowances in payment and not recipients. A person may be in receipt of more than one allowance.
8. Based on a one per cent. sample.
9. Based on one per cent. sample.
10. Based on 100 per cent. count of cases.
11. Based on 100 per cent. count of cases.
12. Replaced by Incapacity benefit from 13 April 1995.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many (a) loans and (b) grants had been made in each region by the social fund in the last year for which figures are available. [32829]

The administration of the social fund is a matter for Mr. Ian Magee, the chief executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what was the value of each of the bids received for the four ITSA data centres. [33164]

It is not normal practice for commercially sensitive information to be made available in this manner.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if the EDS bids for lots E and F were the lowest; and if he will make a statement. [33167]

All suppliers' bid for lots E and F were evaluated in accordance with an approved process covering financial and non-financial aspects. The EDS bids for the lots were the lowest bids received.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what assessment he has made as to whether the purchase by EDS of all four DSS computer centres threatens security of supply and on-going competition; and if he will make a statement. [33168]

The decision to award all data centre services work to EDS was made after a rigorous technical, financial and business evaluation in full accord with EC services directive 92/50/EEC. The contractual agreement allows the Department of Social Security to market test any segment of the awarded business if, in its judgment, competitive prices are not being maintained. In those circumstances, the Department may award business to another supplier.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will list the contracts his Department has with the computer company EDS. [33176]

The following contracts are currently held with EDS: area computer centre facilities management— a contract to manage the area computer centre at Norcross, Blackpool; Child Support Agency, technical services agreement—development of Child Support Agency computer system; Child Support Agency live support—maintenance of child support agency computer system; framework agreement for computer and related services—consultancy support; Focus' 95—outsourcing contract for data centre services elements of ITSA's service delivery. This includes management of the area computer centre at Norcross, Blackpool.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what estimate he has made of the value to Britain's invisible exports of the long-distance haulage industry. [32570]

In 1994, it is estimated that UK road hauliers contributed £520 million to UK invisible exports.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) when he now expects the A3 trunk road works in the region of Guildford to be completed; what penalty clauses are in operation for time overruns; and what compensation will be paid to those businesses which have suffered a prolonged downturn in custom as a result of the roadworks and consequent delays; [33643](2) what studies he has made of the traffic delays caused during 1995 by the A3 roadwork operations in the Guildford region; what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the conduct of the contactors with the local authorities and with the signposting and provision of information to motorists; and if he will make a statement. [33642]

These are operational matters for the highways agency. I have asked the chief executive to write to my right hon. Friend.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list for each train operation unit or company, the support payments made to the Director of Passenger Rail Franchising to British Rail, under section 52 of the Railways Act 1993. [34207]

The Director of Passenger Rail Franchising is currently negotiating with the British Railways Board the level of support for passenger rail services, under section 52 of the Railways Act 1993, appropriate of reach train operating unit or company in the current financial year. I will write to the hon. Member when the level of support has been agreed and will place a copy of the letter in the Library of the House.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what are the main conclusions of his Department's research collating figures involving four-wheel drive off-road vehicles with particular reference to (a) the period of survey and (b) the total number of accidents in which such vehicles were involved, indicating the proportion of total accidents constituted by this figure. [34040]

Personal injury road accident data obtained by the police and reported to the Department using the STATS19 accident report form show that in 1994, four-wheel off-road vehicles were known to be involved in approximately 3,400 accidents, a figure which constitutes 1.5 per cent. of the total number of accidents.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many of the four-wheel drive off-road vehicles involved in accidents collated in his Department's research were fitted with bull-bars; how many pedestrian-only accidents involving (a) children and (b) adults were recorded, indicating the vehicle's speed at the time of the accident; how many involved pedestrian deaths in respect of (a) and (b); and if he will indicate the numbers of (i) cars and (ii) light commercial vehicles involved. [34041]

The information requested is not available. The Transport Research Laboratory is currently analysing the accidents identified by the police during 1994 which involved a vehicle fitted with a bull bar. Its report is expected to answer questions as far as possible.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport which companies have been shortlisted to supply British Rail with catering products; and if he will make a statement on what the contract is worth and what it entails. [34084]

The supply of catering products to British Rail and the details of any relevant contractual arrangements are commercial matters for the British Railways Board.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if it remains his policy that the channel tunnel rail link will be built only within the route and limits of deviation specified in the Channel Tunnel Rail Link Bill and in the documents listed in that Bill. [34134]

Yes. Construction of the route on the lands defined in the hybrid Bill is a minimum requirement of the competition.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many (a) coaches and (b) heavy goods vehicles have been found to be unsafe in each of the last five years; and how many prosecutions have taken place as a consequence. [34142]

Information relating to numbers of prosecutions is contained in Home Office and Scottish Office statistics. The statistics show the number of offences and not the number of vehicles found unsafe. Consequently, the information does not distinguish between road vehicle types.The relevant figures are shown in the table below:

	England and Wales		Scotland
Year	Offences1	Offences prosecuted in Magistrates court	Offences2	Offences Prosecuted
1989	389,043	97,351	48,179	10,797
1990	383,715	89,419	47,477	9,897
1991	382,078	91,890	46,765	8,839
1992	381,232	93,504	47,775	7,980
1993	383,382	87,354	51,387	6,557
1 These figures relate to circumstances where a vehicle or vehicle part has been found to be in a dangerous or defective condition including brakes, steering gear, tyres. They also include offences of using a vehicle in a dangerous condition and other related offences. The action taken includes prosecutions (shown separately), vehicle defect rectification notices issued, written warnings and fixed penalty notices issued.
2 The offences covered are offences under the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 and the Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations 1989.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what steps he is taking to expand the work of the Vehicle Inspectorate to achieve higher standards of bus and coach following the Operation Tourist crackdown; and if he will make a statement. [34083]

We are committed to increasing compliance with the safety standards for buses and coaches through an effective enforcement regime. The joint Vehicle Inspectorate and police Operation Tourist crackdown—which involved staff targeting tourist coaches suspected of having safety defects on holiday routes in the south and west on 8 July—demonstrates that commitment.Regular roadside enforcement checks and checks of vehicles at operators' premises are an essential tool for increasing compliance with safety standards. Special roadside enforcement exercises such as Operation Tourist provide an opportunity to target one specific vehicle type. Moreover, an additional £100,000 has recently been made available to the Vehicle Inspectorate for enforcement work in relation to buses and coaches this financial year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport which highway authorities in England had three or more new schemes approved for transport supplementary grant in his approvals for (a) 1994–95 and (b) 1995–96. [34133]

No authority had three or more new schemes approved for transport supplementary grant in either of these years.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he will publish the draft Noise Insulation Regulations for New Railway Lines; and if he will make a statement. [34569]

The Draft Noise Insulation Regulations for New Railway Lines and associated technical memorandum have been laid before Parliament today. The regulations are intended to provide equity of treatment as between those living alongside new railway lines and those living alongside new roads, who are protected by existing noise insulation regulations.Although I fully expect developers of new railway lines to take all practical measures to reduce railway noise at source, there will inevitably be instances where this may not be possible or cost-effective.The new regulations will create a duty, in the case of new lines and additional tracks constructed alongside existing lines, to provide insulation, or a grant for the costs of carrying out insulation works, when noise exceeds certain levels. They also give a discretionary power to offer insulation in the case of certain alterations to existing railway lines.With a number of new railway projects either planned or under construction, it is only fair and proper that people who live alongside these lines should have a similar degree of statutory noise protection that their neighbours living near new roads have benefited from over the last 20 years.In the case of existing railway lines, which now carry new channel tunnel rail traffic, noise mitigation schemes have been agreed between BR/Railfreight Distribution and Kent and Surrey county councils and the London borough of Bromley. Under these schemes, acoustic barriers are being erected at affected locations alongside existing lines to and from the channel tunnel. They are being jointly funded by the organisations involved, with Government assistance.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what consideration he has given to the use of the North Downs line as a route for international freight trains avoiding London. [34435]

In August 1994, Railtrack reported to me that the North Downs line was not a commercially viable alternative route. I asked officials to report to me whether there was likely to be any environmental benefits which could justify the development of the North Downs line at public expense. They have concluded that there are not. I have today placed a copy of their report in the Library of the House.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how the Coastguard Agency has implemented efficiency savings; to what extent; and what further changes he intends to make before April 1996. [34028]

This is an operational matter for the Coastguard Agency. I have asked the chief executive to write to the hon. Member.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what was the annual basic pay for traffic examiners, senior traffic examiners and vehicle examiners in each year since 1984; [33586](2) what were the numbers of immediate and delayed prohibitions imposed by the Vehicle Inspectorate on trucks for each year since 1984; [33582](3) how many hours were lost in Vehicle Inspectorate enforcement for each year since 1984 because police resources could not be provided; [33584](4) how many staff are employed within the Vehicle Inspectorate

These are operational matters for the Vehicle Inspectorate agency. I have asked the chief executive to write to the hon. Member.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will estimate the cost of employing consultants in connection with privatisation programmes in which his Department has been engaged since 1980. [33449]

Gross voted expenditure since 1980 by the Department on the employment of consultants on privatisation programmes involving the Department, and other costs associated with these privatisations, has been some £122 million.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to his answer of 31 March, Official Report, columns 830–31, if he will make a statement on the outcome of the discussions between the Civil Aviation Authority and the joint aviation authorities at the meeting which was due to be held in April on the issue of the lack of an existing system whereby the joint aviation authorities can respond as a body to safety recommendations raised by national investigating authorities. [31642]

[holding answer 3 July 1995]: It was agreed that the existing International Civil Aviation Organisation system for receiving and responding to safety recommendations remains appropriate and effective. Under ICAO, responsibility for continue airworthiness rests with the state of design. This remains the case where certification is against a Joint Aviation Authorities harmonised code adopted by that state. Should the recommendation affect a JAA code, the state of design would normally refer the issue to the JAA; the JAA would close their action by confirming any resultant change made to the code.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to his answer of 6 March 1995, column 57, what assessment he has made of how much more local funding is necessary before the Government release the funding they have promised for the midland metro line; how many jobs will be created by the new line; what other such rail lines are planned for the west midlands; and what percentage of funding for the midland metro line will come from the local area, and how much will come from the Government.

After considering proposals for funding from local authorities in the west midlands, I am pleased to announce that we are now satisfied with the level of local funding being provided for this project. I can therefore confirm that the Government will provide £80 million of funding, as requested by the local authorities. Together with the local contribution and the funding expected to be provided by the European regional development fund, this provides sufficient funding for the scheme to go ahead.Midland metro line one is excellent news for travellers in the west midlands; it will be good for the environment and provide motorists with an alternative form of transport in a congested corridor.

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for Sunderland, South (Mr. Mullins) of 23 May, Official Report, column 534, if he will define the nature of behavioural conditions that can be applied to civil servants. [34205]

The business appointment rules for Crown servants make provision for applications by civil servants to take up new employment after they leave the service to be approved subject to behavioural conditions, which may include an absolute or qualified ban on involvement of the applicant in dealing between the prospective employer and the Government, or a ban on involvement by the applicant in dealings between the prospective employer and a named competitor or competitors of that employer. If a behavioural condition is considered necessary, it will be tailored to meet the particular circumstances of the case.

To ask the First Secretary of State if he will be answering questions on behalf of the Prime Minister when the latter is absent from the House. [34292]

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to him today by the Prime Minister.

To ask the First Secretary of State (1) what involvement he will have in Departments of state; and if he will specify the Departments; [34293](2) if he will list his responsibilities with particular reference to those he undertakes as Deputy Prime Minister. [34288]

I refer the hon. Member to the answer my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister gave to the hon. Member for Pembroke (Mr. Ainger) on 11 July. Official Report, column 496–97.

To ask the First Secretary of State if he will list all the duties to be undertaken by the Deputy Prime Minister; and if he will make a statement. [34031]

I refer the hon. Member to the replies which my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister gave to the hon. Member for Pendle (Mr. Prentice) and for Pembroke (Mr. Ainger) on 11 July 1995, Official Report columns 496–97.

To ask the First Secretary of State how he intends to account to the House for his ministerial responsibilities. [34038]

I refer the hon. Member to the answer my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister gave to the hon. Member for Pendle (Mr. Prentice) on 11 July, Official Report, column 496.

To ask the First Secretary of State what is the number of staff who will be directly responsible to him; and if he will list their duties. [34289]

I refer the hon. Member to the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister to the hon. Member for Pendle (Mr. Prentice) on 11 July 1995 Official Report, column 496.

To ask the First Secretary of State what ministerial accommodation he has now; and if he will also state the total amount of accommodation used by the staff directly accountable to him. [34287]

I refer the hon. Member to my answer to the hon. Member for Gordon (Mr. Bruce), given today.

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many leak inquiries in Government Departments there have been since 1990; what is the estimated cost of these inquiries; and how many individuals have been reprimanded or prosecuted as a result of these inquiries. [34253]

It is not the practice of the Government to give information on such matters.

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, pursuant to his answer of 28 June, Official Report, column 713, what considerations led to his refusal to supply the requested information in relation to Government leak inquiries; and if he will make a statement. [34352]

It has not been the practice of the Government to disclose the details of leak inquiries.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what was the unit cost per pupil in each local education authority in 1993–94 for (a) nursery/primary and (b) secondary pupils. [34328]

The table sets out for each LEA in England the net institutional expenditure per pupil in LEA-maintained nursery/primary and secondary schools.

Cost per pupil—Net institutional expenditure	Nursery/ Primary 1993–94 £	Secondary 1993–94 £
Corporation of London	3,587	0
Camden	2,047	2,716
Greenwich	2,009	2,583
Hackney	1,958	2,617
Hammersmith and Fulham	2,534	3,329
Islington	2,719	3,005
Kensington and Chelsea	2,394	3,266
Lambeth	2,666	3,296
Lewisham	2,058	2,614
Southwark	1,806	2,421
Tower Hamlets	2,656	3,157
Wandsworth	2,139	2,795
City of Westminster	2,592	2,739
Barking	1,790	2,355
Barnet	2,006	2,952
Bexley	1,573	2,341
Brent	1,633	1,835
Bromley	1,525	2,280
Croydon	1,793	2,309
Ealing	1,915	2,575
Enfield	1,768	2,531
Haringey	2,236	3,041
Harrow	1,913	2,439
Havering	1,636	2,290
Hillingdon	1,804	2,670
Hounslow	1,784	2,282
Kingston upon Thames	1,728	2,284
Merton	1,853	2,463
Newham	1,708	2,563
Redbridge	1,640	2,526
Richmond upon Thames	1,794	2,280
Sutton	1,639	1,978
Waltham Forest	1,821	2,526
Birmingham	1,572	2,330
Coventry	1,684	2,469
Dudley	1,490	2,098
Sandwell	1,681	2,349
Solihull	1,574	2,217
Walsall	1,672	2,281
Wolverhampton	1,357	2,300
Knowsley	1,485	2,243
Liverpool	1,586	2,613
St. Helens	1,605	2,315
Sefton	1,448	2,204
Wirral	1,552	2,299
Bolton	1,581	2,119
Bury	1,432	1,979
Manchester	1,547	2,328
Oldham	1,645	2,278
Rochdale	1,307	1,974
Salford	1,505	2,215
Stockport	1,466	2,310

Cost per pupil—Net institutional expenditure	Nursery/Primary 1993–94 £	Secondary 1993–94 £
Tameside	1,442	2,095
Trafford	1,428	2,156
Wigan	1,437	2,141
Barnsley	1,539	2,101
Doncaster	1,425	2,022
Rotherham	1,723	2,271
Sheffield	1,573	2,119
Bradford	1,654	1,969
Calderdale	1,607	2,162
Kirklees	1,579	2,207
Leeds	1,647	2,164
Wakefield	1,577	2,150
Gateshead	1,664	2,252
Newcastle upon Tyne	1,697	2,187
North Tyneside	1,469	1,995
South Tyneside	1,463	1,948
Sunderland	1,509	2,114
Isles of Scilly	2,401	4,415
Avon	1,571	2,288
Bedfordshire	1,639	2,103
Berkshire	1,592	2,214
Buckinghamshire	1,735	2,286
Cambridgeshire	1,534	1,956
Cheshire	1,483	2,106
Cleveland	1,461	2,129
Cornwall	1,535	2,160
Cumbria	1,667	2,216
Derbyshire	1,600	2,214
Devon	1,503	2,157
Dorset	1,485	2,065
Durham	1,664	2,114
East Sussex	1,643	2,270
Essex	1,724	2,286
Gloucestershire	1,523	2,084
Hampshire	1,583	2,180
Hereford and Worcester	1,617	2,038
Hertfordshire	1,664	2,245
Humberside	1,621	2,257
Isle of Wight	1,598	2,027
Kent	1,397	2,079
Lancashire	1,669	2,347
Leicestershire	1,629	2,263
Lincolnshire	1,496	2,322
Norfolk	1,585	2,309
North Yorkshire	1,555	2,187
Northamptonshire	1,522	2,125
Northumberland	1,686	2,083
Nottinghamshire	1,653	2,381
Oxfordshire	1,765	2,191
Shropshire	1,577	2,354
Somerset	1,583	2,138
Staffordshire	1,534	2,078
Suffolk	1,673	2,190
Surrey	1,701	2,215
Warwickshire	1,555	2,420
West Sussex	1,579	2,467
Wiltshire	1,521	2,379
Total	1,630	2,245