Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 276: debated on Friday 26 April 1996

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Friday 26 April 1996

Environment

Smoking (Public Places)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) to what extent the targets for effective smoking policy in public places have been met in the last 12 months; [26593](2) what steps he will take to improve the voluntary imposition to smoking controls in public places; [26578](3) what plans he has to introduce statutory protection of the public from passive smoking. [26579]

In 1992, the Government's target was that 80 per cent. of public places should have effective smoking policies by the end of 1994. The report "Smoking in Public Places, 2nd Survey Report, " a copy of which has been put in the Library of the House of Commons, shows for eight categories of establishment the percentage with an effective smoking policy are:

CategoryPercentage
Shops63
Advice/money transactions48
Travel38
Health71
Formal education77
Informal education62
Food/entertainment37
Sports/recreation48
The report relates to a survey carried out in 1995. The Government's position is that non-smoking should be the norm in all enclosed public spaces visited by the public, with facilities as appropriate for those who wish to smoke. In 1991, the Department of the Environment, jointly with other Departments, published a code of practice on smoking in public places which provides practical guidance to owners and managers on implementing suitable policies on smoking. The Government will continue to make copies of that code freely available. The essence of a voluntary approach to smoking in public places is that the public should make their views known without Government interference.The report shows that the voluntary approach is working, albeit more slowly than had been hoped. The Government had no plans to introduce statutory protection of the public from passive smoking beyond that which already exists.

Defence

Government Contracts

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what is the annual cost to his Department of allowing defence companies to claim the costs of marketing their products abroad as overheads on non-competitive Government contracts; [26184](2) what is the annual cost to his Department of allowing the costs of entertainment to be included in the overheads on non-competitive Government contracts by companies claiming the costs of marketing their products abroad. [26185]

The financial information requested is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. However, these costs are the subject of detailed negotiations with individual companies, to ensure that they comply with the criteria laid down in Government accounting conventions for the pricing of non-competitive contacts. Briefly, such costs must be necessarily incurred and be fair and reasonable; they must conform to an appropriate classification into "product groups", which must be agreed by my Department and they must not relate directly to a contract, in which case they would be directly charged to that contract and not be attributed to overheads.

Cyprus (Service Personnel)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to his answer of 17 April, Official Report, columns 501-3, in respect of the soldiers convicted of killing a Danish tour guide in Cyprus, if he has conveyed to the Danish Government the content of the reply; and if he will make a statement. [26551]

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence wrote to the Danish Minister of Defence, Mr. Hans Haekkerup, on 3 April to make clear the Army's abhorrence of the disgraceful conduct of the three convicted riflemen.

Marine Services Organisation

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for Worcester (Mr. Luff) of 28 February, Official Report, columns 553-54, on the market testing of the Marine Services Organisation, what were the reasons for non-compliance with the management requirements of the task which led to the elimination of the in-house team. [26693]

The in-house team's bid for the ports element of the marine services market test was ruled to be non-compliant since the proposed management arrangements were judged to be inadequate for the effective control of the task and to carry an unacceptably high risk of failure, with consequent financial and operational penalties to my Department. Specific areas of concern included the absence, under the in-house bid team's proposals, of a single focal point at each naval base responsible and accountable for all aspects of the provision of ports services. In addition, levels of delegation to junior staff were judged to exceed what was considered desirable.

There would also have been no acceptable system of tasking and prioritising the resources available at each base from the outset of the new operation. The risk assessment associated with these management weaknesses took into account the increase in the marine service tasks to be performed and the reduction of resources with which to undertake them; circumstances which underline the need for effective management arrangements to be put in place. The in-house bid team was ruled non-compliant accordingly and eliminated from this element of the market-test competition.

Land Mines

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what recent discussions he has had with the chiefs of staff concerning the military utility of anti-personnel land mines. [27025]

It is not normal practice to give details of discussions between Ministers and their advisers. Our policy on anti-personnel mines reflects our judgment of the balance to be struck between humanitarian goals and the continuing needs of our armed forces until there is international agreement on a total ban on such mines, or viable alternatives are developed.

Kaymar Telephone Numbers

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence which of his Department's offices used telephone numbers (a) 01–374–0075 and (b) 01–434–1162 in each year since 1970. [26694]

I refer the hon. Member to the answer which I gave on 18 April to my hon. Friend the Member for Eltham (Mr. Bottomley), Official Report, column 583.

Trade And Industry

Machine Guns

To ask the President of the Board of Trade what is the total number of machine guns and semi-automatic rifles for which import licences were granted for each of the last five years; and if he will break down the figures by (a) domestic police and armed forces end use and (b) others. [26427]

DTI licences for the import of machine guns and semi-automatic rifles are issued only to those individuals or companies who have a valid authority, granted at the discretion of either the Home Secretary, the Scottish Secretary or the Northern Ireland Secretary, to hold or to trade in such weapons.The numbers of these types of firearms for which import licences were specifically applied for each of the past five years are as follows:

  • Year
  • 1991: £26,709
  • 1992: £ 7,908
  • 1993: £14,571
  • 1994: £23,166
  • 1995: £31,233.

It should, however, be borne in mind that some licences are not used or are only partly used.

It is not possible from import licensing data to provide details of the number of weapons destined for police possession. The armed forces are exempt from the Firearms Act and from DTI import licensing.

Home Department

Kpmg

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the consultancies let to KPMG in each of the last three years and the contract fee in each case. [25559]

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to him on 25 April, Official Report, columns 261-62.

Prisoners (Hiv)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many HIV positive cases were recorded for prison inmates in England and Wales during 1995. [26545]

Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter from Richard Tilt to Mr. Tom Cox, dated 26 April 1996:

The Home Secretary has asked me to reply to your Question asking about the number of HIV positive inmates during 1995.
Thirty three new cases of HIV positive inmates were notified by establishments to Prison Service headquarters in 1995. An average of 69 inmates were known to be HIV positive at any one time during that year.

Prisoners (Drugs)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many inmates have been put on report in each prison in England and Wales for having in their possession unauthorised drugs, since 1 January. [26304]

Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for reply to be given.

Letter from Richard Tilt to Mr. Tom Cox, dated 26 April 1996:

The Home Secretary has asked met to reply to your recent Question concerning the number of inmates who have been put on report in each prison in England and Wales for having in their possession unauthorised drugs, since 1 January.
Provisional figures for the numbers found guilty at adjudication of unauthorised possession of controlled drugs are shown in the attached table.

Proved adjudications for drugs possession—January-March 1996 (provisional)

Number

MALE ESTABLISHMENTS

Prisons and remand centres

886

Remand centres

171
Brinsford42
Dorchester3
Exeter1
Feltham26
Glen Parva23
Gloucester27
Hindley33
Lancaster Farms19
Northallerton11
Norwich1
Reading4
Rochester1

Local prisons

535
Bedford4
Birmingham35
Blakenhurst1
Bristol5
Brixton20
Bullingdon2
Camp Hill1
Canterbury9
Cardiff10
Chelmsford6
Doncaster43
Dorchester8
Durham60
Elmley10
Exeter9
Gloucester4
Highdown67
Holme House11
Leeds4
Leicester36
Lincoln3
Liverpool62
Manchester64
Norwich5
Pentonville19
Preston1
Shrewsbury7
Wandsworth24
Wood Hill1
Wormwood Scrubs4

Open prisons

14
Ford2
Hewell Grange2
Kirkham2
Morton Hall3
North Sea Camp4
Usk1

Closed training prisons

166

Dispersal prisons

9
Parkhurst5
Wakefield3
Whitemoor1

Category B trainers

19
Albany6
Blundeston2
Dartmoor9
Maidstone1
Swaleside1

Category C trainers

138
Acklington36
Aldington6
Brockhill6

Proved adjudications for drugs possession—January-March 1996 (provisional)

Number

Buckley Hall8
Camp Hill17
Downview2
Elmley1
Erlestoke8
Guys Marsh1
Highpoint1
Holme House1
Littlehey1
Moorland4
Ranby7
Risley21
Stafford8
Stocken1
Verne3
Wayland4
Wealstun2

Young offender institutions

174

Closed young offender institutions

92
Aylesbury5
Brinsford21
Feltham13
Glen Parva19
Guys Marsh1
Lancaster Farms1
Moorland11
Onley6
Portland7
Stoke Heath8

Open young offender institutions

27
Thom Cross25
Usk2

Juvenile young offender institutions

55
Brinsford20
Feltham8
Lancaster Farms2
Onley5
Portland5
Stoke Heath3
Thorn Cross3
Wetherby9
FEMALE ESTABLISHMENTS

Adult Female establishments

16

Local prisons

16
New Hall2
Risley14

Walton Prison

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department which wings in HMP Walton are currently closed; which wings at this establishment are planned to be closed in the near future; what are the reasons for each of the closures; and if, once the areas closed and planned to be closed have re-opened, there will be no slopping out. [26436]

[holding answer 23 April 1996]: Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter from Richard Tilt to Mr. George Howarth, dated 26 April 1996:

The Home Secretary has asked me to reply to your recent Question about the closure of wings at Liverpool prison.
Liverpool's H Wing closed on Saturday 23 March 1996 and is awaiting major refurbishment, including the provision of integral sanitation. All other wings at Liverpool have been refurbished and include such sanitation. There is no slopping out at Liverpool or at any other establishment in England and Wales.

Risley Prison

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the Minister with responsibility for prisons last visited Risley prison. [26334]

[holding answer 24 April 1996]: I visited Risley prison on Wednesday 10 April.

Health

Chief Executives (East Sussex)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what factors underlay the provision of £700,000 for the pensions following the early retirement of the chief executives of East Sussex health authority and the East Sussex family health services authority. [26423]

I understand that these pension provisions were made in accordance with the national health service superannuation scheme and are a matter for East Sussex, Brighton and Hove health authority. The hon. Member may wish to contact the chairman of the authority, Mr. Julian Wellesley, for details.

St George's Hospital, Tooting

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) on how many occasions in 1995 patients were turned away from St. George's hospital, Tooting, because the bed capacity of the hospital was complete; and if he will make a statement; [26582](2) What has been the number of staff redundancies amongst nursing staff at St. George's hospital within the last 12 months. [26586](3) how many patients were operated on privately at St. George's hospital Tooting, after referral by a general practitioner to that hospital, during 1995; [26588](4) how many operations were cancelled at St. George's hospital during 1995; [26581](5) how many patients have had to wait for four hours or more in the accident and emergency services at St. George's hospital, Tooting, as a result of a shortage of hospital beds since 1 January 1996; [26583](6) how many patients had to wait overnight in the accident and emergency services at St. George's hospital, Tooting, during 1995; [26585](7) what was the average length of time that

(a) a general practitioner fundholder patient and (b) a patient of a non-fundholding general practitioner waited for an orthopaedic operation at St. George's hospital, Tooting, once a general practitioner has made referral, in 1995; [26587]

(8) on how many occasions in 1995 St. George's hospital, Tooting, was accepting only emergency bed service referrals. [26580]

This information is not available centrally. The hon. Member may wish to contact Dr. Elizabeth Vallance, chairman of St. George's Healthcare national health service trust, for details.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what discussion has taken place between his Department and the NHS trust management of St. George's hospital, Tooting, regarding any future possible bed closures. [26556]

The National Health Service Executive holds regular business planning meetings with national health service trusts, including St. George's Healthcare NHS trust. No proposals for future bed closures have emerged from those meetings. The trust opened 16 additional beds on 1 April, and plans to open two additional paediatric intensive care beds later this year.

Funding (Doncaster)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate he has made of the amount by which current national health service funding in the Doncaster area is under target; what action he plans to take to meet the target; and if he will make a statement. [26646]

Doncaster health authority is £2.8 million or 2.2 per cent. under target in 1996–97.We plan to move all health authorities to their weighted capitation target as soon as it is practicable.

Gp Fundholding

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what is the estimated total cost in 1996, 1997 and 1998 of additional payments to health authority managers who recruit general practitioners to become fundholders; [26795](2) what new financial incentives are to be offered to health authority managers to persuade general practitioners to become fundholders. [26794]

Performance-related pay is awarded at the discretion of employing authorities, who decide locally what objectives are set for particular posts.

Sheffield Centre For Health And Related Research

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what funding was provided by the Trent regional health authority, prior to its dissolution, to the Sheffield centre for health and related research. [26812]

Trent regional health authority provided the following funding to the Sheffield centre for health and related research.

£
Purpose1994–951995–961996–97
Operational research56,000130,00070,000
Purchasing effective care30,00016,000

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what employees at the Sheffield centre for health and related research are paid directly or indirectly by funds made available through the national health service executive or by other NHS funds; and if, in each case, he will list their name, current salary and remuneration package. [26813]

The Department of Health and National Health Service Executive fund some research and development work carried out at the Sheffield centre for health and related research, through the university of Sheffield. The centre is part of the University of Sheffield. Current information about its employees and their remuneration is a matter for the university.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which staff from the Trent regional health authority transferred to take up posts at the Sheffield centre for health and related research, or took up posts at that centre consequent on the dissolution of the regional health authority. [26847]

Three staff formerly employed by Trent regional health authority's operational research division took up employment with the Sheffield centre for health and related research in 1994.

Trent Regional Health Authority

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to his answer of 16 April, Official Report, column 477, what exceptions were made in providing redundancy terms more favourable than those listed in section 45 of the General Whitley Council handbook or circular HSG (94) 18, following the dissolution of the Trent regional health authority; in each case, what were the circumstances in which this was done; and by how much the terms agreed exceeded those set out in the above guidance. [26848]

Departmental File Records

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when the five-year rule for keeping and destroying departmental file records was introduced; if he will now review its usefulness; if the five-year rule applies to the departmental solicitors' records; what representations he has had from the National Audit Office concerning the destruction of five-year-old records; when the records pertaining to the extra-statutory payments for general practitioner fundholders' management allowances were destroyed; and if he will make a statement. [27070]

Since the 1960s the guiding principle for Government record keeping is for Departments routinely to review the need to retain records once their business use has ceased. This is set out in detail in the Public Record Office's "Manual of Records Administration", a copy of which is in the Library.Following a thorough review of departmental records management in 1995–96, all important Department of Health information is kept for at least two years and the need to keep it is reviewed when it is between two and five years old. These procedures apply to all departmental records including those for departmental solicitors.No representation have been received from the National Audit Office on this issue.

Health Authority Funding

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will set out in descending order the funding allocation per head of population to each health authority in England. [26890]

Dental Treatment

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what representations he has received concerning local reduced availability of NHS dental treatment; and if he will make a statement. [26979]

We receive letters from hon. Members and from the public about access to general dental services. Health authorities can advise patients on where best to seek national health service dental treatment locally.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will set out in descending order, by health authority in England, the incidence of (a) dental caries in five-year-olds, (b) adults with no natural teeth and (c) oral cancer. [26891]

The table shows the latest information on the incidence of oral cancer in each of the former regional health authorities in descending order. Information on dental caries in five-year-olds and adults with no natural teeth is not available in the form requested. I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave the hon. Member for Peckham (Ms Harman) on 16 February at column 737, for information on the mean number of decayed, missing and filled teeth of five-year-old children in each health authority in 1993–94.

Provisional crude rates and numbers or oral cancers1diagnosed in 1990 in England and Wales
Regional Health Authority (as at 1990)Rate per 100,000Number
Mersey7.76187
North Western7.08283
Northern6.25193
Yorkshire6.20227
Wales5.84168
East Anglian5.63116
Wessex5.61166
South East Thames5.29195
West Midlands4.97261
Trent4.79225
North West Thames4.72168
Oxford4.55116
South West Thames4.54137
South Western4.26140
North East Thames3.98150
Total5.372,732
1 Oral cancer is defined as: cancer of the lip (International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, 140), tongue (ICD9 141), gum (ICD9 143), floor of the mouth (ICD9 145), unspecified parts of the mouth (ICD9 145), oropharynx (ICD9 146), nasopharynx (ICD9 147), and hypopharynx (ICD9 148). Cancers of the salivary glands (ICD9 142) have been excluded as they are not normally grouped with oral cancers.

Manchester Health Authority

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what factors were taken into account in making the current year's allocation of funding to Manchester health authority; and if he will make a statement. [26892]

In 1996–97 we have maintained continuity and stability of funding by ensuring that no health authority lost resources. All health authorities received a cash uplift of 2.73 per cent. for Manchester health authority this meant a cash increase of £6.2 million.We have also ensured greater equity in resource allocation by using growth principally to move under-target health authorities closer to target. As Manchester health authority was more than 10 per cent. over target it received no allocation for growth in 1996–97.

Read Codes

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when the business case was completed for the development funding of Read codes; when Treasury approval was obtained for the scheme; what is the total discontinuation compensation payment agreed under the terms for the purchase of the rights from Mr. Read; what payment has been made to (a) Loughborough university and (b) Mr. Read under the rights purchase agreement; and if he will make a statement. [27065]

I refer the hon. Member to the reply my hon. Friend the then Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Mr. Sackville) gave him on 18 October 1995 at column 280–81.Details of negotiations conducted on behalf of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health are confidential.Part of the agreement to make Read clinical codes crown copyright is that the purchase price is not divulged to third parties.

Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs

Exports

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the revisions to his Department's objectives for export promotion since those listed in table 1.3 of "Overseas Trade Service: Assistance to Exporters", a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 293; and if he will make a statement. [26703]

Our objectives and achievements, including for trade and investment promotion, are contained in the departmental report for 1996, a copy of which has been placed in the Library of the House.The National Audit Office report (HC 293) on services to exporters provided by the FCO and DTI through their joint export promotion arm Overseas Trade Services shows that the FCO's overseas posts provide valuable assistance to existing and potential British exporters and investors overseas. The NAO concluded that the OTS services it examined in four south-east Asian countries had helped introduce around 1,000 British companies to those markets over two years. These services, which cost around £4.5 million to provide, helped generate additional exports for British companies worth around £345 million: a gearing of almost 1:80.

Serco Ltd

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what contracts his Department and his agencies have with Serco Ltd.; what is the current cost; when each contract ends; what are the penalties involved should he seek early termination of the contract; and if he will make a statement. [26680]

Private Finance Initiative

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the revenue spending estimated by his Department in connection with the private finance initiative for (a) 1995–96, (b) 1996–97 and (c) 1997–98. [26632]

We consider the use of private finance as the preferred option for all proposed capital projects. No projects under the private finance initiative scheme have yet been agreed. It is not yet possible to make an accurate estimate of the revenue implications of potential PFI projects.

Eu Foreign Affairs Council

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what was the outcome of the Foreign Affairs Council and the intergovernmental conference ministerial meeting on 22 April. [27169]

The A items listed in document 6507/96, which will be placed in the Libraries of the House as soon as it is available, were approved except item 6 of the former Yugoslavia which became a B item for substantive discussion.The Council took note of resolution in EP documents 5779/96 (PE-RE-24) and 6210/96 (PE-RE 27). Copies of these documents will be deposited in the Libraries of the House as soon as they are available.The Council agreed conclusions on former Yugoslavia; the critical dialogue with Iran; and the US/'Helms/Burton' legislation on trade with Cuba.A declaration on the latest developments in Lebanon and conclusions on the situation in Niger were agreed. The Council also expressed its sympathy for the families of victims of the terrorist attack in Cairo on 18 April.The Council discussed the MEDA regulation on aid to countries in the Mediterranean. While no agreement was reached at this Council, the presidency expressed hope for agreement during the next Council scheduled for 13 May. Ministers also discussed former Yugoslavia; and Slovenia.The Council discussed the continuing export ban on British beef products. The Secretary of State underlined the urgent need for progress towards lifting the ban.

In the margins of the Council, partnership and co-operation agreements were signed with Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia.

The sixth EU/Gulf Co-operation Council joint Council and ministerial meeting also took place, followed by a dinner. Ministers discussed the prospects for a free trade agreement and agreed to set up a joint EU/GCC working group on regional security in the Gulf.

The second ministerial session of the IGC also took place on 22 April. Ministers considered a range of issues, under the broad heading of "the Citizen and the Union" on the basis of eight questions in a presidency note (doc No. Conf 3843/95) which has been placed in the Library of the House. The issues included: the workings of the justice and home affairs pillar; EU citizenship; fundamental rights; the employment and environment provisions of the treaty; subsidiarity; and transparency.

We reiterated the positions that the UK representative had already set out in the two preceding working party sessions on 1 and 2 and 15 and 16 April, in particular that intergovernmental co-operation was the appropriate model for justice and home affairs and that, in general, this was working well; that businesses, not new treaty provisions on employment, created jobs; that neither strengthening the concept of EU citizenship, nor writing fundamental rights into the treaty which were already protected in national laws would be likely to bring Europe closer to the citizen; and that subsidiarity should be further entrenched in the treaty.

The ministerial session was preceded by an exchange of views with the European Parliament President and two representatives of the European Parliament.

European Bodies (Costs)

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on increases in the costs of (a) the European Union Commission, (b) the EU Country Auditors and (c) the European Court, since 1990; and what are their estimated costs in 1996. [26317]

I have been asked to reply.I presume my hon. Friend refers to the cost of the European Commission, the European Court of Auditors and the European Court of Justice. The information is provided in the table:

Costs of the European Commission, European Court of Auditors and the European Court of Justice
1990 (ecu)1996 (ecu)Average annual growth (Per cent.)
European Commission1,505.02,696.710.3
European Court of Auditors53.456.23.1
European Court of Justice66.9169.717.7

Notes:

  • 1. The figures for 1990 are outturn figures and have been taken from the 1990 European Court of Auditors report. The figures for 1996 are taken from the adopted European Community Budget.
  • 2. The calculation of average annual growth has been based on the outturn for 1990–94 as shown in the relevant European Court of Auditors reports, and planned expenditure for 1995 and 1996 taken from the adopted European Community Budgets for those years.
  • To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the estimated cost of the Agriculture Directorate General for 1996; and what is the cost of the Agriculture Commissioner's cabinet. [26316]

    I have been asked to reply.I am afraid the 1996 EC budget does not show the information requested. I suggest that my hon. Friend contacts the European Commission direct.

    Scotland

    Read Codes

    To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what part-funding contribution his Department has made towards the development of Read codes for computerised health and hospital information systems. [27064]

    The Scottish Office department of health has not made any contribution towards the funding of the development of Read codes.

    Historic Scotland (Performance Targets)

    To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will publish the key performance targets he has set Historic Scotland for 1996–97. [27541]

    I have set Historic Scotland the following key performance targets for 1996–97:

    Target
    Protecting Scotland's Built Heritage
    Number of monuments scheduled370
    Weighted number of listed building resurvey units176
    Percentage of scheduled monument consent cases resolved within 12 weeks81 per cent.
    Percentage of listed building consent cases resolved within 28 days97 per cent.
    Number of historic building repair projects newly assisted by grant145
    Total value of grand-assisted repairs in Progress£33.5 million
    Backlog of conservation of monuments in carereduce
    Promoting and Presenting the Built Heritage
    Number of visitors to monuments in care2.4 million
    HS market share compared to major paid heritage attractions in Scotland47 per cent.
    Percentage of satisfied visitors (based on surveys)95 per cent.
    Average spend per visitor£1.02
    Agency management
    Percentage efficiency gains/savings on all non-grant expenditure1.5 per cent
    Total agency income£9.9 million

    Further Education

    To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland when he will publish his report on the discharge of his duties for further education in Scotland as required under section 1 of the Further and Higher Education Scotland (Act) 1972; and if he will make a statement. [27542]

    My right hon. Friend's report on further education in Scotland in 1995 has been published today and has been laid before both Houses of Parliament. Copies are available in the Library of the House.The report, entitled "Further Education in Scotland 1995: Report by the Secretary of State for Scotland" shows that further education colleges have continued to raise standards and that progress has been made in the use of performance indicators as part of their quality assurance arrangements. They continue to make an impressive contribution to the training needs of individuals and of employers and are to be congratulated on the 6 per cent. increase in student activity and 4 per cent. efficiency gains which they achieved in the 1994–95 academic year.

    Copyright

    To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what progress his Department has made towards obtaining a photocopying licence from the copyright licensing agency to ensure compliance with copyright law. [26711]

    [holding answer 25 April 1996]: The Department is discussing detailed arrangements with the copyright licensing agency to determine what, if any, need it has for a licence to ensure compliance with copyright law.

    Education And Employment

    Private Finance Initiative

    To ask the Secretary of State

    Pupils of Primary and Secondary school age whose education is provided by Local Education Authorities by LEA of provision LEA of residence and age, for each (LEA in England1
    March 1996January 1994
    Provision
    Political control of authority2All PupilsPupils resident in other LEAs
    NumberNumberPercentage
    5-1011-1516+5-1011-1516+5-1011-1516+
    Corporation of LondonIndependent169801614095.350.00.0
    CamdenLabour8,6288,9541,9319434,4531,20510.949.762.4
    GreenwichLabour16,73412,8911,5989942,2922795.917.817.5
    HackneyLabour13,2777,4684449291,0751277.014.428.6
    HammersmithLabour7,2545,7665306272,7023318.646.962.5
    IslingtonLabour12,1317,0534241,7102,37117714.133.641.7
    Kensington and ChelseaConservative5,1422,8024781,3231,56229825.755.762.3
    LambethNo overall control15,3097,2121671,1371,226627.417.037.1
    LewishamLabour16,49210,1171,0841,0782,0162076.519.919.1
    SouthwarkLabour17,0149,2411591,7222,5448610.127.554..1
    Tower HamletsLabour16,80811,393943321785991.96.910.5
    WandsworthConservative13,0898,4381,2061,3912,55032510.630.226.9
    WestminsterConservative7,3626,3931,1581,7193,67069523.357.460.0
    BarkingLabour12,1078,9019778489691267.010.912.9
    BarnetNo overall control18,85916,1482,9811,5353,8877398.124.124.8

    for Education and Employment if she will list the revenue spending estimated by her Department in connection with the private finance initiative for (a) 1995–96, (b) 1996–97 and (c) 1997–98. [26626]

    The estimated recurrent spending by this Department, including the Employment Service—but not including independent education institutions or local authorities—in connection with projects undertaken through the private finance initiative cannot, yet, be accurately calculated for 1996–97 and 1997–98. None was paid in 1995–96. As the hon. Member will surmise from the answer to her question of 19 April, this Department estimates that a number of projects will come forward over the next few years. I also refer the hon. Member to the reply given to the hon. Member for Sheffield, Attercliffe (Mr. Betts) on 6 December, Official Report, column 311.

    Local Education Authorities

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what evidence she has indicating whether some local authorities are now delegating a smaller proportion of their budgets to schools in the primary, secondary or special school sectors when compared with 1993. [26790]

    I will write to my hon. Friend when the local management of schools budget statements produced by local education authorities for 1996–97 have been analysed by the Department.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if she will show for each English local education authority (i) the total number of pupils in each authority's (a) primary and (b) secondary schools, (ii) the total number of pupils and percentage at (1) primary and (2) secondary level who are educated outside their home local education authority, (iii) the total number and percentage of pupils in each authority at (x) primary and (y) secondary level who come from another local education authority and (iv) the political control of each local education authority. [26789]

    Pupils of Primary and Secondary school age whose education is provided by Local Education Authorities by LEA of provision LEA of residence and age, for each (LEA in England1

    March 1996

    January 1994

    Provision

    Political control of authority2

    All Pupils

    Pupils resident in other LEAs

    Number

    Number

    Percentage

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    5-1011-1516+
    BexleyLabour (minority)16,25412,8871,8846101,4741813.811.49.6
    BrentNo overall control17,14710,8782,0921,1671,1622466.810.711.8
    BromleyConservative18,92814,9282,6601,1722,0062436.213.49.1
    CroydonLabour21,99214,8365491,1271,4701445.19.926.2
    EalingLabour19,30412,5071,4001,0228241235.36.68.8
    EnfieldLabour18,94315,6192,6357462,1333673.913.713.9
    HaringeyLabour14,8368,3241,1609921,3051226.715.710.5
    HarrowNo overall control14,04510,478691,1311,38468.113.28.7
    HaveringLabour (minority)16,75714,1221,0104011,1272452.48.024.3
    HillingdonLabour16,50112,4711,9504128401922.56.79.8
    HounslowLabour14,71112,7202,0887503,0164205.123.720.1
    Kingston upon ThamesLiberal Democrat8,4236,7141,2905091,4982946.022.322.8
    MertonLabour10,7187,5306819661,3381899.017.827.8
    NewhamLabour20,82613,839415283511581.43.714.0
    RedbridgeNo overall control16,56912,8822,8051,0591,3403306.410.411.8
    Richmond upon ThamesLiberal Democrat8,9017,711231,0233,120611.540.526.1
    SuttonLiberal Democrat11,2599,8331,7763051,9214672.719.526.3
    Waltham ForestLabour (minority)16,21611,564309416485292.64.29.4
    BirminghamLabour86,19960,6655,9541,1021,2962491.32.14.2
    CoventryLabour23,96017,2622,293217400620.92.32.7
    DudleyLabour23,03318,2343216671,1731152.96.435.8
    SandwellLabour23,97817,9699648531,4251253.67.913.0
    SolihullConservative/Independent15,66713,1395541,1952,258767.617.213.7
    WalsallNo overall control21,51517,3992,4683911,5132471.88.710.0
    WolverhamptonLabour19,47414,4101,937477547972.43.85.0
    KnowsleyLabour14,0958,996484852569456.06.39.3
    LiverpoolLabour39,71227,7803,9491,1511,2652162.94.65.5
    St. HelensLabour13,91611,0581,0324358941013.18.19.8
    BoltonLabour21,53416,2201,1333078131061.45.09.4
    BuryLabour13,56210,6013849386203.68.10.0
    ManchesterLabour36,23422,0994411,5301,100354.25.07.9
    OldhamLabour19,21115,9217805452,0821422.813.118.2
    RochdaleConservative/Liberal Democrat17,67912,524783201298371.12.44.7
    SalfordLabour17,77311,876321,03043005.83.60.0
    StockportLiberal Democrat (minority)21,15715,672397527502532.53.213.4
    TamesideLabour18,09913,6008346884222.66.22.4
    TraffordNo overall control15,84512,5721,2483121,207882.09.67.1
    WiganLabour24,21819,5954824571,487381.97.67.9
    BarnsleyLabour16,84312,683182101221120.61.76.6
    DoncastorLabour24,05218,1132,471110218510.51.22.1
    RotherhamLabour20,16717,1491,5552241,2781321.17.58.5
    SheffieldLabour35,47226,0961,507140152400.40.62.7
    BradfordLabour41,71530,1244,465203238730.50.81.6
    CalderdaleLabour15,45711,8661,674327437612.13.73.6
    KirkleesLabour30,17922,6511,648252315490.81.43.0
    LeedsLabour52,29439,3724,9014111,0172010.82.64.1
    WakefieldLabour24,60818,4541,102168528860.72.97.8
    GatesheadLabour14,34610,7871,247193407411.33.83.3
    Newcastle upon TyneLabour18,93114,0911,7212758481691.56.09.8
    North TynesideLabour14,48011,0761,101482291293.32.62.6
    South TynesideLabour12,3639,59822663330430.53.419.0
    SunderlandLabour24,08819,0978231744361160.72.314.1
    Isles of ScillyIndependent14913501000.70.00.0
    Avon3No overall control66,25149,4166,458272716940.41.41.5
    BedfordshireNo overall control43,35332,9844,0036666791351.52.13.4
    BerkshireLabour/Lib.Dem./Independent54,52642,1236,6526591,4634331.23.56.5
    BuckinghamshireConservative47,93638,0707,4168099912841.72.63.8
    CambridgeshireLabour/Liberal Democrat49,41237,8233,835439372470.91.01.2
    CheshireConservative/Liberal Democrat73,29158,8106,8865692,2593410.83.85.0
    Cleveland4Labour48,70836,847686121259220.20.73.2
    CornwallLiberal Democrat33,78427,1172,26749242320.10.91.4
    CumbriaLabour (minority)34,88028,0593,466783261110.21.23.2
    DerbyshireLabour68,43853,6564,992580600940.81.11.9
    DevonLiberal Democrat (minority)70,03054,8316,477174504930.20.91.4
    DorsetLiberal Democrat41,55334,6834,7233431,2983310.83.77.0
    DurhamLabour44,90435,7082,789134133490.30.41.8
    East SussexLabour/Liberal Democrat43,56832,6762,7322887071200.72.24.4
    EssexLabour/Liberal Democrat110,04489,3998,6333951,0211810.41.12.1
    GloucestershireNo overall control37,53030,2624,0872628371110.72.82.7
    HampshireLib.Dem/Labour/Independent112,85984,9961,4257311,1281120.61.37.9

    Pupils of Primary and Secondary school age whose education is provided by Local Education Authorities by LEA of provision LEA of residence and age, for each (LEA in England1

    March 1996

    January 1994

    Provision

    Political control of authority2

    All Pupils

    Pupils resident in other LEAs

    Number

    Number

    Percentage

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    5-1011-1516+
    Hereford and WorcesterLabour/Liberal Democrat48,31939,1594,0975571,1961451.23.13.5
    HertfordshireNo overall control70,80458,06310,2591,4623,2607582.15.67.4
    Humberside5Labour68,69763,3053,6041951,183640.32.21.8
    Isle of WightLiberal Democrat8,5156,7791,1230100.00.00.0
    KentNo overall control110,70189,34814,0794581,2122810.41.42.0
    LancashireLabour109,12082,4314,151376835790.31.01.9
    LeicestershireNo overall control68,54053,3956,243226486350.30.90.6
    LincolnshireLabour/Liberal Democrat42,08034,8614,2002579291430.62.73.4
    NorfolkLabour (minority)49,88741,2954,7651275421090.31.32.3
    North Yorkshire6No overall control48,62040,0674,5822931,8883380.64.77.4
    NorthamptonshireLabour45,80335,9085,2562677491430.62.12.7
    NorthumberlandLabour22,66119,2593,2023695531071.62.93.3
    NottinghamshireLabour75,25957,2886,1373057301100.41.31.8
    OxfordshireNo overall control38,31029,7164,2082991,6802300.85.75.5
    ShropshireLabour/Liberal Democrat30,63724,1751,450200582590.72.44.1
    SomersetLiberal/Democrat32,63924,8111,613276242480.81.03.0
    StaffordshireLabour79,67161,8195,8297011,2661710.92.02.9
    SuffolkLabour/Liberal44,73735,5655,4715617281401.32.02.6
    Democrat
    SurreyConservative/Liberal Democrat60,36345,8494,8851,8242,2212023.04.84.1
    WarwickshireLabour (minority)35,07826,9723,1469979151742.83.45.5
    West SussexLiberal Democrat (minority)45,96138,5684,1035401,4501811.23.84.4
    WiltshireNo overall control43,10531,5693,443323472700.71.52.0
    England3,502,6572,686,084276,88564,532124,66717,7171.84.66.4

    1 For LEAs in existence immediately prior to Local Government Reorganisation on 1 April 1996

    2 Political control immediately prior to Local Government Reorganisation on 1 April 1996

    3 Avon has now become

    Bath and North East Somerset (No overall control) Bristol City Council (Labour)
    North West Somerset (Liberal Democrat minority)
    South Gloucestershire Council (No overall control)

    4 Cleveland has now become

    Hartlepool Borough Council (Labour)
    Middlesbrough (Labour)
    Redcar and Cleveland (Labour)
    Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council (Labour)

    5 Humberside has now become

    Kingston-upon-Hull City Council (Labour)
    East Riding Authority (No overall control)
    North East Lincolnshire Authority (Labour)
    North Lincolnshire Council (Labour)

    6 North Yorkshire has now become

    York City Council (Labour)
    North Yorkshire (No overall control).

    March 1996

    January 1994

    Residence

    Political control of authority1

    All Pupils

    Pupils whose education is provided by other LEAs

    Number

    Number

    Percentage

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    Corporation of LondonIndependent282552021571.484.0100
    CamdenLabour8,9786,3531,0001,2931,85227414.429.227.4
    GreenwichLabour16,81612,1571,4971,0761,5581786.412.811.9
    HackneyLabour13,9359,7856791,5873,39236211.434.753.3
    HammersmithLabour7,4455,0104498181,94625011.038.855.7
    IslingtonLabour11,3387,5697219172,8874748.138.165.7
    Kensington and ChelseaConservative4,2822,8823474631,64216710.857.048.1
    LambethNo overall control17,05911,2515732,8875,26546816.946.881.7
    LewishimLabour17,27010,9801,1871,8562,87931010.726.226.1
    SouthwarkLabour16,3399,2863501,0472,5892776.427.979.1
    Tower HamletsLabour17,00111,7379475141,1291033.09.610.9
    WandsworthConservative12,5688,4131,1188702,5252376.930.021.2
    WestminsterConservative6,3694,5237067261,80024311.439.834.4
    BarkingLabour11,6828,5299724235971213.67.012.4
    BarnetNo overall control18,39113,6552,5831,0671,3943415.810.213.2
    BexleyLabour (minority)16,32812,6651,8666841,2521634.29.98.7

    March 1996

    January 1994

    Residence

    Political control of authority1

    All Pupils

    Pupils whose education is provided by other LEAs

    Number

    Number

    Percentage

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    BrentNo overall control18,18713,8722,4722,2074,15662612.130.025.3
    BromleyConservative18,32113,7642,5415658421243.16.14.9
    CroydonLabour21,91916,0427821,0542,6763774.816.748.2
    EalingLabour19,33714,4011,6331,0552,7183565.518.921.8
    EnfieldLabour19,09014,8482,5348931,3622664.79.210.5
    HaringeyLabour14,8309,7981,5809862,7795426.628.434.3
    HarrowNo overall control13,77510,5585748611,4645116.313.989.0
    HaveringLabour (minority)16,68313,8108683278151032.05.911.9
    HillingdonLabour16,82612,6461,9167371,0151584.48.08.2
    HounslowLabour15,09611,4491,7621,1351,745947.515.25.3
    Kingston upon ThamesLiberal Democrat8,2996,0811,074385865784.614.27.3
    MertonLabour10,6017,3927068491,2002148.016.230.3
    NewhamLabour21,13014,3855315871,0571742.87.332.8
    RedbridgeNo overall control16,41712,9202,6459071,3781705.510.76.4
    Richmond upon ThamesLiberal Democrat8,1355,4811632578901463.216.289.6
    SuttonLiberal Democrat11,8518,9901,4258971,0781167.612.08.1
    Waltham ForestLabour (minority)16,44212,1135136421,0342333.98.545.4
    BirminghamLabour87,00163,3265,9161,9043,9572112.26.23.6
    CoventryLabour24,03617,1832,282293321511.21.92.2
    DudleyLabour22,78817,9633434229021371.95.039.9
    SandwellLabour23,76117,7279826361,1831432.76.714.6
    SolihullConservative/Independent14,87011,319534398438562.73.910.5
    WalsallNo overall control21,58016,5552,318456669972.14.04.2
    WolverhamptonLabour19,51714,9331,9885201,0701482.77.27.4
    KnowsleyLabour14,52710,5347101,2842,1072718.820.038.2
    LiverpoolLabour39,39527,7703,8488341,2551152.14.53.0
    St. HelensLabour13,69811,225
    BoltonLabour21,54315,8641,03631645791.52.90.9
    BuryLabour14,15710,235551,088496177.74.830.9
    ManchesterLabour36,17724,3634931,4733,364874.113.817.6
    OldhamLabour Conservative/Liberal18,89714,244650231405121.22.81.8
    RochdaleDemocrat17,85813,4718583801,2451122.19.213.1
    SalfordLabour17,30712,07280564626483.35.260.0
    StockportLiberal Democrat (minority)21,01615,597388386427441.82.711.3
    TamesideLabour18,05913,263117428505362.43.830.8
    TraffordNo overall control15,95412,3131,3004219481402.67.710.8
    WiganLabour24,39018,893493629785492.64.29.9
    BarnsleyLabour16,91513,107256173645861.04.933.6
    DoncasterLabour24,04418,3282,467102433470.42.41.9
    RotherhamLabour20,03216,0021,43889131150.40.81.0
    SheffieldLabour35,57926,7211,560247777930.72.96.0
    BradfordLabour42,03431,6524,7585221,7663661.25.67.7
    CalderdaleLabour15,20811,6941,66978265560.52.33.4
    KirkleesLabour30,25422,9961,678327660791.12.94.7
    LeedsLabour52,10639,1334,8682237781680.42.03.5
    WakefieldLabour24,58918,0871,038149161220.60.92.1
    GatesheadLabour14,25010,9021,312975221060.74.88.1
    Newcastle upon TyneLabour19,34713,9221,6526916791003.64.96.1
    North TynesideLabour14,18311,3981,169185613971.35.48.3
    South TynesideLabour12,3749,40825874140750.61.529.1
    SunderlandLabour24,04319,043755129382480.52.06.4
    Isles of ScillyIndependent14813500000.00.00.0
    Avon1No overall control66,17549,1886,449196488850.31.01.3
    BedfordshireNo overall control Labour/Liberal43,13433,0314,0164477261481.02.23.7
    BerkshireDemocrat/Independent54,87442,3476,3961,0071,6871771.84.02.8
    BuckinghamshireConservative48,29839,9737,7831,1712,8946512.47.28.4
    CambridgeshireLabour/Liberal Democrat49,35638,1103,9153836591270.81.73.2
    CheshireConservative/Liberal Democrat73,22457,3246,6775027731320.71.32.0
    Cleveland3Labour48,64936,71567462127100.10.31.5
    CornwallLiberal Democrat33,82027,3152,31785440820.31.63.5
    CumbriaLabour (minority)34,81727,8243,4001591450.00.31.3
    DerbyshireLabour68,34654,2565,0904881,2001920.72.23.8
    DevonLiberal Democrat (minority)69,96054,9266,479104598950.11.11.5
    DorsetLiberal Democrat41,37833,6184,412168233200.40.70.5
    DurhamLabour45,15136,1942,830381619900.81.73.2
    East SussexLabour/Liberal Democrat43,48733,1442,8772071,1752650.53.59.2
    EssexLabour/Liberal Democrat110,82590,6859,0341,1762,3075821.12.56.4
    GloucestershireNo overall control Liberal Democrat/Labour/37,48229,7774,057214352810.61.22.0
    HampshireIndependent113,04485,5511,6659161,6833520.82.021.1
    Hereford and WorcesterLabour/Liberal Democrat48,90339,2624,1351,1411,2991832.33.34.4
    HertfordshireNo overall control69,95255,6049,7166108012150.91.42.2
    Humberside4Labour68,59952,8673,60897745680.11.41.9

    March 1996

    January 1994

    Residence

    Political control of authority1

    All Pupils

    Pupils whose education is provided by other LEAs

    Number

    Number

    Percentage

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    5-10

    11-15

    16+

    Isle of WightLiberal Democrat8,5186,7801,1243210.00.00.1
    KentNo overall control110,55189,12713,9653089911670.31.11.2
    LancashireLabour109,34883,0104,3326041,4142600.61.76.0
    LeicstershireNo overall control68,68953,3796,286375470780.50.91.2
    LincolnshireLabour/Liberal Democrat42,06635,4484,1622431,5161050.64.32.5
    NorfolkLabour (minority)50,34041,2914,750580538941.21.32.0
    North Yorkshire5No overall control48,75238,7284,3564255491120.91.42.6
    NorthamptonshireLabour45,83035,4125,196294253830.60.71.6
    NorthumberlandLabour22,47518,9243,142183218470.81.21.5
    NottignhamshireLabour75,31957,2456,1313656871040.51.21.7
    OxfordshireNo overall control38,39628,4744,063385438851.01.52.1
    ShropshireLabour/Liberal Democrat30,67723,9721,471240379800.81.65.4
    SomersetLiberal Democrat32,75525,3641,6823927951171.23.17.0
    StaffordshireLabour79,87061,8995,8909001,3462321.12.23.9
    SuffolkLabour/Liberal Democrat Conservative/Liberal44,43735,2535,4352614161040.61.21.9
    SurreyDemocrat60,03846,3275,2561,4992,6995732.55.810.9
    WarwickshireLabour/(minority)34,59426,9713,1115139141391.53.44.5
    West SussexLiberal Democrat (minority)45,86737,6704,003446552811.01.52.0
    WiltshireNo overall control43,14532,1113,5263631,0141530.83.24.3
    England3,502,7122,686,098276,90364,587124,68117,7351.84.66.4

    1 Political control immediately prior to Local Government Reorganisation on 1 April 1996.

    2 Avon has now become Bath and North East Somerset (No overall control).

    Bristol City Council (Labour).
    North West Somerset (Liberal Democrat minority).
    South Gloucestershire Council (No overall control).

    3 Cleveland has now become Hartlepool Borough Council (Labour).

    Middlesbrough (Labour).
    Redcar and Cleveland (Labour).
    Stockton on Tees Borough Council (Labour).

    4 Humberside has now become Kingston upon Hull City Council (Labour).

    East Riding Authority (No overall control).
    North East Lincolnshire Authority (Labour). North Lincolnshire Council (Labour).

    5 North Yorkshire has now become York City Council (Labour).

    North Yorkshire (No overall control).

    Jobseeker's Allowance

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment in what circumstances claimants of jobseeker's allowance may receive travelling expenses from the Employment Service for the journey that they make to attend the jobcentre for their fortnightly review; and if she will make a statement. [27029]

    As now, under jobseeker's allowance the Employment Service will not pay travelling expenses to claimants for the journey that they make to the jobcentre for their normal fortnightly attendance.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment in what circumstances an unemployed person may make a new claim for jobseeker's allowance by post; and if she will make a statement. [27032]

    People wishing to make a new claim for jobseeker's allowance will normally be given an appointment to attend their local jobcentre in person for an interview with an employment officer. This ensures that they have access to the Employment Service's range of services and opportunities at the earliest opportunity. Making a new claim by post will however be allowed when exceptional adverse weather or other local circumstances prevents the jobseeker from the reaching the jobcentre, or when the jobcentre itself is closed to the public due to some exceptional circumstance. Arrangements will then be made for the jobseeker to attend the jobcentre in person for a full interview as soon as the situation allows. Jobseekers who live at a considerable distance from their nearest jobcentre will also be able to make a new claim for JSA by post, if attendance at the jobcentre would require them to be absent from home for more than eight hours. The Employment Service will arrange for them to have a full interview with a visiting officer at a location convenient to their home within four weeks of the date of claim.

    Nursery Voucher Scheme

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what plans she has to extend the voucher scheme to include all three-year-olds. [26209]

    It is important to get provision for four-year-olds right before extending the voucher scheme to cover three-year-olds. We will consider such an extension in due course.

    School Inspections

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if she will make a further statement on future school inspection arrangements. [27496]

    I refer to the answer I gave on 19 December 1995, Official Report, column 1017. Having consulted Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools on future school inspection arrangements, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has now asked him to consult on more targeted arrangements to come into effect from September 1997 for secondary schools and September 1998 for other schools. The chief inspector expects to initiate this consultation next week.

    Lord Chancellor's Department

    Private Finance Initiative

    To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what estimate he has made of funding to be made available to his Department through the private finance initiative in (a) 1995–96, (b) 1996–97 and (c) 1997–98 [26166]

    For the Lord Chancellor's Department, including the Court Service and the Public Trust Office, no funding became available through the private finance initiative in 1995–96. Current estimates suggest that capital spending on projects by the private sector will be £4.6 million in 1996–97 and £27.3 million in 1997–98.

    Court Costs

    To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what were the costs of (a) out-of-court settlements and (b) awards made in court, for each of the last three years and so far this year; and what were the annual legal costs incurred. [26008]

    The question concerns a specific operational matter on which the chief executive of the Court Service is best placed to provide an answer and I have accordingly asked the chief executive to reply direct.

    Letter from Michael Huebner to Mr. Chris Mullins, dated 26 April 1996:

    The Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department, has asked me to reply to your Question about costs of cases settled outside court, awards made in court and legal costs.
    Unfortunately, information about the size of out of court settlements and awards is not held centrally and could only be obtained at a disproportionate cost. The Court Service does not collect figures for legal costs for all cases.

    Council Of Europe

    To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what assessment he has made of the proposal in recommendation 1286 (1996) of the parliamentary assembly of the Council of Europe for a permanent intergovernmental structure to deal with issues relating to children; and if he will make a statement. [26097]

    I have been asked to reply. This proposal is still under consideration.

    Attorney-General

    Extradition Warrants

    To ask the Attorney-General if he will make a statement on the procedure by which extradition warrants are prepared and completed in the United Kingdom and transmitted to the relevant authorities in the Irish Republic; and if it is standard procedure for the Irish authorities to confirm the completeness and correctness of documentation prior to its submission to court. [26363]

    Applications for arrest warrants in the United Kingdom are made on behalf of the relevant police force to a justice of the peace or, in certain cases, to a judge.The applications are prepared and conducted by the Crown Prosecution Service, or as the case may be, the Crown Solicitor's Office in Northern Ireland. When a warrant is obtained in a case in which extradition is sought from the Republic of Ireland it is personally delivered by the police to their counterparts in the Republic. Thereafter, the matter becomes one for the Irish authorities.A warrant cannot be executed in the Republic of Ireland until it has been endorsed by a Commissioner of the Garda. In "accusation" cases, there is an additional requirement in that the Commissioner can not endorse the warrant without the authority of the Irish Attorney-General. Under Irish law the Irish Attorney must direct that the warrant not be endorsed unless he is satisfied that there is a clear intention to prosecute based on sufficient evidence. To enable the Irish Attorney to discharge this duty I supply him with a certificate confirming the prosecuting authority's intention to prosecute, a statement detailing the facts of the case and statement of the relevant English law. If the Irish Attorney is satisfied, the warrant is endorsed and the accused is arrested and brought before the court. This additional requirement does not apply where the person named on the warrant has, following an examination of the evidence, been committed for trial or has escaped from custody following conviction.

    Extradition

    To ask the Attorney-General how many applications for extradition have been submitted to the authorities in the Republic of Ireland in each of the past 10 years for terrorist-related offences; how many in each year have been successful; and how many in each year have been rejected on the basis that they were incorrectly prepared. [25932]

    Applications for extradition for alleged "terrorist-related offences" have been brought before the Irish courts in 23 cases in the past 10 years. Fifteen of these cases were brought by the authorities in Northern Ireland and eight by the authorities in England.In five cases the individual concerned has been extradited. In a further five cases the individual has fled following a successful application or appeal and in two of these has subsequently been arrested in the UK.Extradition has been refused on the ground of defects in the papers in three cases. Two cases were refused in 1986 on the ground that the warrants were defective and one case was refused in 1996 on the ground that the original warrant was not produced.In seven cases the individual has successfully appealed against an extradition order and in three further cases appeals are pending.Details are not included of cases not yet before the courts.

    Table 2: Number of medical cases referred to a medical board relating to occupational asthma in 1991
    All boardingsMales not diagnosedMales diagnosed 1-13 per cent.Males diagnosed 14-100 per cent.Females not diagnosedFemales diagnosed 1-13 per cent.Females diagnosed 14-100 per cent.
    Cardiff591614164Nil9
    Swansea155161Nil2
    Glasgow8537627924
    Stoke on Trent5413823235
    Sheffield84341125536
    Manchester113647151818
    Newcastle92498284Nil3
    London91362393Nil11
    Total all boards5932545717946948
    Table 3: Number of medical cases referred to a medical board relating to occupational asthma in 1992
    All boardingsMales not diagnosedMales diagnosed 1-13 per cent.Males diagnosed 14-100 per cent.Females not diagnosedFemales diagnosed 1-13 per cent.Females diagnosed 14-100 per cent.
    Cardiff14451124711320
    Swansea2312171Nil2
    Glasgow100444261448
    Stoke on Trent17163215316117
    Sheffield3631783182491013
    Manchester30520517214985
    Newcastle30321116321Nil7
    London1505864623215
    Total all boards1,559822933451842887

    Social Security

    Occupational Asthma

    To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many claims under the industrial injury scheme were made by people suffering from occupational asthma; how many of these claims were (a) successful and (b) unsuccessful broken down by region and gender in each case in the past five years. [25781]

    The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is set out in the tables. A breakdown by gender is available only in relation to medical boarding and is set out in tables 2 to 5. Industrial injuries disablement benefit is not normally payable for assessments below 14 per cent.

    Table 1
    Calendar year19911992199319941995
    Number of claims to occupational asthma1,5181,5841,7511,7031,690
    Number not referred for medical assessment1,2925251931813N/A
    Number not diagnosed by medical board23001,0061,0481,0163N/A

    Notes:

  • 1 Only claims which satisfy employment rules are referred for medical examination.
  • 2 Claims may not necessarily be decided during the year of receipt.
  • 3 N/A-not available.
  • Source:

    Benefits Agency Central Data Unit and based on 100 per cent. count.

    Table 4: Number of medical cases referred to a medical board relating to occupational asthma in 1993

    All boardings

    Males not diagnosed

    Males diagnosed 1-13 per cent.

    Males diagnosed 14-100 per cent.

    Females not diagnosed

    Females diagnosed 1-13 per cent.

    Females diagnosed 14-100 per cent.

    Cardiff1224424113616
    Swansea198172Nil1
    Glasgow122753211319
    Stoke on Trent1607213506118
    Sheffield426234279543522
    Manchester2701848294045
    Newcastle26917935620110
    London17083112332714
    Total all boards1,558879683221692595

    Table 5: Number of medical cases referred to a medical board relating to occupational asthma in 1994

    All boardings

    Males not diagnosed

    Males diagnosed 1-13 per cent.

    Males diagnosed 14-100 per cent.

    Females not diagnosed

    Females diagnosed 1-13 per cent.

    Females diagnosed 14-100 per cent.

    Cardiff113487351238
    Swansea35151151Nil3
    Glasgow88572214Nil4
    Edinburgh72351189Nil9
    Stoke on Trent17977155316315
    Sheffield300154137433620
    Manchester28920016263449
    Newcastle2851794702615
    London161927322433
    Total all boards1,522857663441592076

    Source Tables 2-5: Benefits agency disability benefit centres and based on 100 per cent. count.

    Child Support Agency

    To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) how many full assessments have been made where the absent parent is in receipt of income support (a) in total since April 1993 and (b) in each year since April 1993; [26566](2) in how many cases awaiting full assessment the absent parent is in receipt of income support. [26567]

    The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the chief executive, Miss Ann Chant. She will write to the hon. Member.

    Letter from Ann Chant to Mr. Frank Field, dated 25 April 1996:

    I am replying to your Parliamentary Questions to the Secretary of State for Social Security about Child Support Agency maintenance assessments.
    The number of cases awaiting assessment in which the absent parent is in receipt of Income Support is not known. The Agency is unable to identify the benefit status of the absent parent before completion of the maintenance assessment process, since there may be considerations that affect the benefit status between the time of receipt of the relevant maintenance form and the completion of a full maintenance assessment.
    However, the number of full maintenance assessments where the absent parent is in receipt of Income Support is available from a 5% scan of the live cases on the Child Support Computer System. As at 31 March 1995 there were 88,900 absent parents in receipt of Income Support and as at 30 November 1995 there were 103,900.
    I hope this is helpful.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) how many full maintenance assessments were made by the Child Support Agency (a) in total since April 1993 and (b) in each year since April 1993; [26558]

    (2) how many cases have been cleared without a full maintenance assessment having been made by the CSA (a) in total since April 1993, (b) each year since April 1993; [26559]

    (3) into what categories cases cleared without assessment by the CSA are placed; and what are the numbers in such categories (a) since April 1993 and (b) each year since April 1993; [26560]

    (4) how many cases of good cause for not co-operating with the Child Support Agency were accepted (a) in total since April 1993 and (b) in each year since April 1993; [26561]

    (5) how many reduced benefit directions have been made (a) in total since April 1993 and (b) in each year since April 1993. [26562]

    The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the chief executive, Miss Ann Chant. She will write to the hon. Member.

    Letter from Ann Chant to Mr. Frank Field, dated 25 April 1996:

    I am replying to your Parliamentary Question to the Secretary of State for Social Security about Child Support Agency maintenance assessments and good cause decisions.
    The number of full and interim maintenance assessments made by the Agency from April 1993 to March 1996 is shown on the attached table. The table also shows the number of cases cleared due to good cause accepted, reduced benefit directions imposed and other clearances.
    The Agency does not have a business need to record routinely all the specific reasons why a case is cleared other than by a maintenance assessment, so we cannot provide a more detailed breakdown of these cases. Other reasons for clearances without a maintenance assessment include the following:-
    benefit ceased—for a variety of reasons
    MAF withdrawal: including reconciliation cases and those where the PWC has requested cancellation (e.g. in private cases)
    no qualifying child

    Number of cases with:—

    1993–94

    1994–95

    1995–96

    Total from April 1993

    Full maintenance assessments132,139187,220110,187429,546
    Without full maintenance assessments (interim)73,30363,61617,689154,608
    Other clearances130,790317,313198,978647,081
    Good cause accepted31,74941,66638,963

    1112,378

    Reduced benefit directions imposedn/an/a27,478

    127,478

    1 These cases form part of the 'Other clearances'.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many cases have there been where the parent with care has made no contact with the CSA after issue of the maintenance application form.[26563]

    The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the chief executive, Miss Ann Chant. She will write to the hon. Member.

    Letter from Ann Chant to Mr. Frank Field, dated 25 April 1996.

    I am replying to your Parliamentary Question to the Secretary of State for Social Security about Child Support Agency maintenance application forms.
    Full details of the numbers of parents with care who have currently made no contact with the Agency after the issue of a maintenance application form are not available as local Field offices (where the bulk of pre maintenance assessment work is now carried out) do not have access to the full functionality of the Child Support Computer System (CSCS).
    However, all CSCS functions will be provided to the Field offices on a phased basis beginning later this year.
    The figures that are available show that in April 1995, the six Child Support Agency Centres had 98,000 such cases, and this has now reduced to 68,000.
    In all cases, other than the 16,000 cases that were temporarily deferred at the beginning of 1995, where a maintenance application form is not returned, the Agency takes the following steps:
    Where a prescribed benefit is in payment, after 14 days the Agency issues a reminder. If there is still no contact from the parent with care, the Agency tries to make contact to establish if a Good Cause investigation is appropriate. If there is still no contact from the parent with care or Good Cause is not accepted, a reduced benefit direction is considered.
    Where a private client does not return a maintenance application form, the requirement to cooperate condition does not apply. In such cases the Agency sends a reminder to the client after two weeks; if there is still no reply, the Agency can take no further action and no follow up contact is made.
    I hope this is helpful.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many parents with care who had not returned their maintenance application forms to the CSA had their cases deferred in December 1994. [26564]

    The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the chief executive, Miss Ann Chant. She will write to the hon. Member.

    no jurisdiction
    death of AP, PWC or qualifying child
    Information on reduced benefit directions imposed became available in 1995–96; prior to this figures were not collected.
    You may be interested to know that information for 1994–95 and 1995–96 on full maintenance assessments, interim maintenance assessments, other clearances, good cause accepted and reduced benefit directions implemented is shown in the CSA Statistical Information placed in the House of Commons Library every month.
    I hope this is helpful.

    Letter from Ann Chant to Mr. Frank Field, dated 25 April 1996:

    I am replying to your Parliamentary Question to the Secretary of State for Social Security about Child Support Agency deferred cases.
    16,000 cases were referred during the period January to March 1995 as a result of the parent with care not returning their maintenance application form (MAF) where the MAF had been issued before July 1994. These cases, where action has been deferred at the present time, should not be confused with the deferred take-on of pre-Agency existing income support cases.
    The cases where a maintenance application form has not been fully completed or returned have had action on them deferred until further notice. However, they remain on the books and can be re-started at the request of the client.
    I hope this is helpful.

    Income Support

    To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) how many income support cases deferred in December 1994 have yet to have their case taken on; [26565](2) how many of the parents with care whose cases have been deferred are estimated to have ex-partners who are on income support. [26568]

    The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the chief executive, Miss Ann Chant. She will write to the hon. Member.

    Letter from Ann Chant to Mr. Frank Field, dated 25 April 1996:

    I am replying to your Parliamentary Question to the Secretary of State for Social Security about Child Support Agency cases deferred in December 1994.
    It is not possible to give an exact figure for the approximately 300,000 Income Support cases deferred in December 1994 that are still outstanding. To obtain this figure a clerical examination of all the deferred cases would have to be made to find the number of cases awaiting action.
    However, the most recent estimate, based on a sampling exercise, suggests that the number outstanding has reduced to around 200,000.
    This reduction is due to a number of reasons. The Agency recommenced take on of these cases in November 1995, in line with the agreement made with the Secretary of State to recommence take on by December 1995; also, in some cases where Income Support has ceased and the parent with care has made a fresh application for benefit, the Agency will have become involved and these cases will have been taken on; in other cases the parent with care will have requested that the Agency take on the case and this will have been done; finally, some clients will no longer be claiming Income Support.
    It is not known precisely how many of the deferred cases have ex-partners who are on Income Support; we will not know their circumstances until we have received a completed maintenance enquiry form. However, experience tells us that a significant number of the absent parents involved are in receipt of Income Support, thus providing little incentive for the parent with care to pursue the case with the Agency.
    I hope this is helpful.

    Wales

    Private Health Diagnosis

    To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what consultations he has had with the chairmen of Welsh health authorities and trusts concerning the efficacy of the guidelines for private practice diagnosis followed by NHS treatment; what recent representations he has received concerning the level of private practice diagnosis preceding NHS treatment; what statistics he has collated on the trend in such patterns of procedure; what assessment he has made of its impact on NHS waiting lists and times; and if he will make a statement. [25393]

    None. It is for the management of NHS trusts to ensure that consultants have agreed up-to-date job plans which set out their fixed commitments and other responsibilities to the NHS, and that the rules regarding private work are observed.

    Further And Higher Education

    To ask the Secretary of State for Wales (1) what were the staff-to-student ratios in further education in Wales in (a) 1980–81, (b) 1994–95 and (c) on the latest data for which figures are available;[26469](2) what was the staff-to-student ratios in higher education in Wales in (i) 1980–81 (ii) 1994–95 and (iii) the latest date for which figures are available. [26476]

    Full information is not available for the years requested. Information for the earliest and latest years available is shown in the following table.

    Ratios of full-time equivalent student numbers to full-time equivalent academic and academic related staff numbers in Wales
    Academic year1980–811982–831993–94
    University of Wales16.26.19.0
    Other Higher Education28.18.816.7
    Further Education8.19.214.1
    1 As at December of each year.
    2 Includes higher education provision at further education institutions.

    Source:

    Universities Statistical Record and the Welsh Office Annual Monitoring Survey.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Wales if he will list the institutions of Welsh higher education categorised by their financial status as determined by the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales. [26470]

    Information about the financial status of individual institutions is a confidential matter between the individual institutions and the funding council. Nine institutions are currently designated as being in a satisfactory financial position, four are marginal; and one is unsatisfactory.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Wales if he will list in (a) cash and (b) real terms the capital funding of Welsh higher education institutions in 1993–94, 1994–95 and 1995–96 and indicate in (i) cash and (ii) real terms the amount of capital funding per student. [26472]

    The amount of capital funding for Welsh higher education institutions in 1993–94, 1994–95 and 1995–96 in cash and real terms was as follows:

    £ million
    1993–941994–951995–96
    CashNovember 1994 pricesCashNovember 1994 pricesCashNovember 1994 prices
    21.53421.93030.89330.89325.29724.620
    The amount of capital funding per student is as follows:

    £
    1993–941994–951995–96
    CashNovember 1994 pricesCashNovember 1994 pricesCashNovember 1994 prices
    376383493493392382

    To ask the Secretary of Stew for Wales if he will list in (a) cash and (b) real terms the amount of capital funding he plans to make available over the next three years and indicate in (i) cash and (ii) real terms the amount of capital funding per student in each of these years. [26473]

    The indicative capital allocation for higher education for 1996–97, 1997–98 and 1998–99 in cash and real terms is as follows:

    £ million
    1996–971997–981998–99
    CashNovember 1994 pricesCashNovember 1994 pricesCashNovember 1994 prices
    23.68122.43021.15819.55214.53813.139
    The amount of capital funding per student is as follows:

    £ million
    1996–971997–981998–99
    CashNovember 1994 pricesCashNovember 1994 pricesCashNovember 1994 prices
    363344326301222200

    To ask the Secretary of State for Wales if he will make a statement about the number of students in higher education in Wales who did not complete their studies in each of the last three years; and what estimate he has made of the impact of the changes in the value of awards made to students and the development of the student loan scheme on the student drop-out rate. [26474]

    The information requested is not currently available but it is being collected by the higher education statistics agency and will be available in due course.The introduction of loans has given students more money for their living costs. Borrowers do not have to begin repaying their loans until at least the April after they leave their courses, and then only if and when their income exceeds 85 per cent. of average earnings. There is no reason, therefore, why students should be unable to continue their education as a result of the shift from grant to loan.For students who do find themselves in financial difficulties institutions can use access funds to help. In 1993–94 and 1994–95 some 4,000 students in higher education institutions in Wales received help from the access funds. In both years, no students in these institutions, who were refused help from the access funds, failed to start or to continue their courses because of financial considerations.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what assessment he has made of the impact on jobs in higher and further education of the funding announcements for 1996–97. [26475]

    The financial provision for higher education for 1996–97 assumes an efficiency saving of 2 per cent. over 1995–96. For further education the planned efficiency saving is 5.3 per cent.It is for institutions to decide how they manage the resources made available to them by the higher and further education funding councils for Wales, including the numbers of staff they employ.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how much was spent in (a) cash and (b) real terms per student in higher education in Wales in (i) 1980–81 and (ii) 1994–95. [26477]

    The information in respect of 1980–81 is not available. The provision in cash and real terms for 1994–95 was £5,004.

    Private Finance Initiative

    To ask the Secretary of State for Wales if he will list the projects in Wales undertaken through the private finance initiative which have already been agreed, giving an indication of the money being spent in each of the financial years over which each project is planned to be undertaken. [26471]

    One project under the private finance initiative has been approved by the Welsh Office so far, a multi-storey car part at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff. The development will be paid for fully by those using the car parking facilities and therefore there is no cost to the Department. Other projects are under consideration. Information on schemes costing less than £1 million is not collected.

    Health Innovation Zone Scheme

    To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what expenditure has been approved under the health innovation zone scheme (a) in the south Wales industrial valleys and (b) elsewhere in Wales; and in which financial years. [27069]

    I will write to the hon. Member and place a copy of my reply in the Library of the House.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Wales (1) what are (a) the competitive tender procedures and (b) the quality standards to be applied to applications for funding under the primary care development fund; what proportion of the allocated sums available under the fund was spent in 1995–96; what assessment he has made of the rate of allocation in 1996–97; and if he will make a statement; [27067]2) on what date, and for what reason, the health innovation zone was transformed into the primary care development fund; what expenditure has been approved under the fund; and if he will publish the fund's terms of reference. [27068]

    The primary care development fund has no formal status; it is a term used by the Department to refer to a number of budgets used to promote health care in the community. These budgets fund a number of centrally-promoted activities but health professionals and others may also bid for money to undertake worthwhile projects throughout Wales. There are no formal terms of reference but the Department expects a project to improve patient care and quality standards are determined on a case-by-case basis. The health innovator zone remains in place and benefits from many of the projects.No sum is specifically allocated for such projects.

    Treasury

    Public Service Pension Schemes

    To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will provide an explanation of the differences in the figures for the liabilities of the main unfunded public service pension schemes set out in (a) the answer to the hon. Member for Dover of 26 April 1993, Official Report, column 289 and (b) the answer to the hon. Member for Birkenhead (Mr. Field) on 26 February, Official Report, columns 358-59 showing which elements are due to (a) timing and (b) other factors. [25858]

    The figures for the capital value of the liabilities of unfunded public service pension schemes are estimates based on data which become available at periodic intervals and, in some cases, in a very limited form. The £170 billion relating to 31 March 1991 was subsequently revised to £185 billion when more reliable data became available.Various factors have contributed to the increase in liability between 1991 and 1993. In the case of deferred benefits and pensions in payment, which are linked to the retail prices index the increases implemented from April 1991 and April 1992 amounted together to just over 15 per cent.

    For employees, liabilities increase in line with pay levels, and some groups had significant pay awards during this period. Other contributing factors affecting the increase include the overall increase in numbers, that is, the number of employees, plus deferred pensions, plus pensions in payment, and the increase in amounts of pension resulting from a large number of redundancies and premature retirements.

    Retail Prices Index

    To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will list the RPI for each month together with the annual increase since June 1983. [26744]

    The information requested is available in tables 11 and 12 of the publication "Retail Prices Index", ONS Business Monitor MM23, a copy of which is available in the House of Commons Library.

    Correspondence

    To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when the hon. Member for Rugby and Kenilworth can expect replies to his correspondence of 23 January and 6 March which refers to Mr. Peter J. Hewer of 3 Heyville croft, Kenilworth; and what are the reasons for the delay which has so far occurred. [26755]

    Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy

    To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the annual cost of measures taken to resolve the BSE problem as decided by 17 April for the first full year and subsequent years, setting out the net cost after recalculations required by the British rebate system, setting out the amounts in sterling, and proportions due net from the UK and the EC. [26758]

    Estimates for 1996–97 to 1998–99 are in the table:

    Estimated cost of measures in the UK taken in response to BSE situation up to 17 April
    £ million
    1996–971997–981998–99
    Net cost borne by the UK750600570
    Net contribution from the EU260140110
    Total cost1,010740680
    The table takes account of the following measures:

  • (a) the compensation arrangements for cattle over 30 months of age which cannot now enter the food chain;
  • (b) the new calf slaughter premium;
  • (c) the package of aid for the renderers and the abattoir and cutting industries announced on 3 April and 16 April respectively;
  • (d) additional running costs for the agriculture departments to enable more activity by the meat hygiene service.
  • The table does not make any allowance for the possible cost of intervention in the beef sector.

    The figures for the net contribution from the EU take account of both the UK's contribution to additional EU spending and the effect of additional receipts on the UK abatement.

    Uncollected Taxes

    To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much is owed to the Inland Revenue in uncollected taxes; and how much has had to be written off in each of the past five years. [26802]

    [holding answer 25 April 1996]: The following table shows the figures for the amounts of uncollected tax owed to the Inland Revenue as at the end of October 1994, the latest date for which figures are available. The amounts represent tax assessed and collectible but not paid as at that date.

    Type of TaxAmount £ million
    Corporation tax561
    Corporation Tax Pay and File158
    Capital Gains Tax151
    Income Tax (excluding PAYE)2,250
    PAYE (including sub-contractor's deductions)647
    Advance Corportion Tax4
    Income Tax on Interest etc.2
    Petroleum Revenue Tax5
    Total3,778
    The amounts of tax remitted or written off for each of the last five year are as follows:

    Year to end OctoberAmount remitted written off £ Million
    19941,159.2
    19931,580.2
    19921,694.2
    1991883.9
    1990568.8

    Overseas Visits

    To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will place in the Library a list of all overseas visits made by all Ministers of his Department since 1990, including (a) details of the places visited and brief reasons for the visit, (b) details of size, composition and cost to public funds of the delegation and (c) the names of non-ministerial members of each delegation and the capacity in which each was present.[17499]

    [holding answer 1 March 1996]: Since I became Chancellor of the Exchequer in May 1993, Treasury Ministers have made nearly 100 overseas visits. Details are as follows:

    Place visitedReason for visit
    Chancellor
    1993
    6-7 JuneLuxembourgECOFIN
    6-7 JulyJapanG7
    12 JulyBrusselsECOFIN
    18-19 JulyGermany
    1-2 AugustBrusselsEC Finance Ministers
    12-13 SeptemberBrusselsECOFIN
    Place visitedReason for visit
    25-29 SeptemberWashingtonIMF
    24-25 OctoberLuxembourgECOFIN
    21-22 NovemberBrusselsECOFIN
    5 DecemberBrusselsECOFIN
    10-14 DecemberBrusselsEuropean Council
    28 December-5 January 1994IndonesiaTrade delegation
    1994
    5-10 JanuaryPhilippinesTrade delegation
    27-30 JanuaryDavos,World Economic
    SwitzerlandForum
    8-9 FebruaryFranceSpeaking engagement and bilateral meeting
    13-14 FebruaryBrusselsECOFIN
    14-15 MarchDetroitG7 Jobs Conference
    20-21 MarchBrusselsECOFIN
    22 MarchSwedenBilateral meeting
    7-9 AprilGreeceInformal ECOFIN
    15-16 AprilWarsawBilateral meeting
    17-19 AprilSt. PetersbergEBRD
    24-26 AprilWashingtonG7
    15-16 MayBrusselsECOFIN
    5-6 JuneBrusselsECOFIN
    6-7 JuneParisOECD
    23-25 JuneCorfuEuropean Council
    29 JuneCologneBilateral meeting
    8-10 JulyItalyG7
    11 JulyBrusselsECOFIN
    27 JulyBrusselsECOFIN
    9-11 SeptemberDusseldorfInformal ECOFIN
    18-19 SeptemberBrusselsECOFIN
    26-28 SeptemberMaltaCommonwealth
    Finance Ministers
    28 September—4 OctoberMadridG7
    9-10 OctoberLuxembourgECOFIN
    21 OctoberBrusselsECOFIN
    6-7 NovemberBrusselsECOFIN
    18 NovemberChateaudunAnglo-French Summit
    4-5 DecemberBrusselsECOFIN
    8-10 DecemberEssen, GermanyEuropean Council
    1995
    31 December 1994—5 January 1995MalaysiaTrade delegation
    5-10 JanuaryThailandTrade delegation
    11-12 JanuaryVietnamTrade delegation
    16 JanuaryBrusselsECOFIN
    26-29 JanuaryDavos,World Economic
    SwitzerlandForum
    3-4 FebruaryTorontoG7
    20 FebruaryBrusselsECOFIN
    19-20 MarchBrusselsECOFIN
    7-9 AprilFranceInformal ECOFIN
    24-27 AprilUSAG7
    14-17 MayUkraineBilateral meeting
    21-22 MayBrusselsECOFIN
    25 May—6 JuneIndiaTrade delegation
    15-17 JuneCanadaG7
    18-19 JuneLuxembourgECOFIN
    25-27 JuneNiceEuropean Council
    10 JulyBrusselsECOFIN
    18 SeptemberBrusselsECOFIN
    29 September—1 OctoberValenciaInformal ECOFIN
    2-6 OctoberJamaicaCommonwealth
    Finance Ministers
    6-9 OctoberWashingtonIMF
    22-23 OctoberLuxembourgECOFIN
    26-27 NovemberBrusselsECOFIN
    14-16 DecemberMadridEuropean Council
    29 December-1 JanuaryParaguayTrade delegation
    1996
    1996
    1-5 JanuaryArgentinaTrade delegation
    6-9 JanuaryChileTrade delegation
    9-13 JanuaryBrazilTrade delegation
    19-21 JanuaryParisG7
    Place visitedReason for visit
    22 JanuaryBrusselsECOFIN
    11 MarchBrusselsECOFIN
    14-20 MarchSouth AfricaTrade delegation
    20-24 MarchZimbabweTrade delegation
    12-14 AprilVeronaInformal ECOFIN
    14-16 AprilSofiaEBRD
    20-23 AprilWashingtonIMF Spring meetings
    Economic Secretary
    1993
    1 JuneParisOECD
    14-16 JulyNew York and WashingtonTrinidad Terms
    16 SeptemberHanoverFinancial Services Conference
    20 September—1 OctoberCaribbeanCommonwealth Finance Minister's Meeting
    11-13 OctoberBrussels andFinancial Services
    LuxembourgRegulation
    1994
    21-29 AprilJapanTrilaterals with Securities Regulators
    16-20 MayNew York andIndustrial Finance
    Los AngelesInitiative
    18-23 SeptemberSaudi Arabia,Accompanying the
    United ArabPrime Minister on His
    Emirates andBusiness Programme
    South Africa
    24-25 OctoberDubaiBritish Bid Business Forum
    1995
    3-6 JanuaryNew York/BostonGATT Talks
    9-11 AprilSwitzerlandMeetings with Swiss Ministers of Finance and Economy
    10-12 MayWashingtonGATS/FS
    29 May—1 JuneHong Kong andTo discuss
    KoreaGATS/Financial Services
    15 JuneHalifax, CanadaHalifax Summit
    1996
    15 AprilToronto, CanadaBritish Invisibles Conference
    Chief Secretary
    1993
    3-10 JulyMexico and ChileBilateral visit (at FCO's expense)
    1994
    5-12 MarchBrazil and ChileBilateral visit and attending the Chilean Presidential Inauguration (at FCO's expense)
    27-28 JuneSpainBilateral visits
    1995
    1-6 JuneOman and SaudiInternational relations
    1996
    1-2 AprilLilleJobs Conference
    Paymaster General
    1993
    7 JuneLuxembourgECOFIN
    21-22 JulyBrusselsBudget Council
    15 NovemberBrusselsBudget Council
    1994
    25 JulyBrusselsBudget Council
    15-16 NovemberBrusselsBudget Council
    Place visitedReason for visit
    1995
    24 JulyBrusselsBudget Council
    17 NovemberBrusselsBudget Council
    1996
    21 MarchBrusselsCIPFA Conference
    Financial Secretary
    No visits made.
    Because of the way out records are currently maintained, to give details of the size, composition and disaggregated costs of travel in each case by both Ministers and officials would entail disproportionate cost. Nonetheless, all costs, including those of the Minister involved are rigorously scrutinised, and the compositions of delegations are kept to a bare minimum.In total the costs of Treasury Ministers' overseas travel by financial year is as follows:

    • 1993–94:£147,000
    • 1994–95: £123,000
    • 1995–96 (to date): £110,000.

    The names of non-ministerial members of delegations are, by convention, not given.

    Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

    Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what funding was provided for Professor Harash Narang's experiments and research into a urine test to detect BSE in cattle. [23227]

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what investigations were carried out by his Department into the request by Harash Narang for research funding for a live test for BSE in cattle; and if he will make a statement. [23353]

    [holding answer 28 and 29 March 1996]: Dr. Narang has not made any formal request to MAFF for research funds for work to develop a live test for BSE in cattle. Were he to make any such application it would be subject to the normal scrutiny procedures required to demonstrate that it was scientifically valid and a practical research proposal. We are in contact with Dr. Narang's sponsor, and are hoping to supply urine samples under a blind system to be agreed.

    Green Minister

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what factors underlay his decision not to be the Green Minister for his Department. [25846]

    [holding answer 23 April 1996]: I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to the hon. Member for Lewisham, Deptford (Ms Ruddock) on22 November 1995, Official Report, column 200.

    Set-Aside Scheme

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list the number of claims and the amount claimed in 1995 for set-aside on land for each county of England. [26743]

    I am unable to provide the information requested by the hon. Member at this moment. However, I will write to him with this information as soon as it is available

    Transport

    Aircraft Inspection

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many meetings (a) he and (b) his officials have had with the Federal Aviation Authority in respect of the FAA inspection programme of foreign countries in each of the last five years. [26912]

    Ministers have not met the FAA to discuss its international aviation safety assessment programme. However, officials have frequent contacts with the FAA and have discussed aspects of the IASA programme on a number of occasions.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many inspections have been undertaken by the Civil Aviation Authority on aircraft not registered in the United Kingdom, but using United Kingdom airports in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. [26904]

    I refer to my reply to the hon. Member for Crew and Nantwich on 7 March 1996, Official Report, column 309. The CAA has since carried out checks on aircraft registered in Liberia, Nigeria and Swaziland.

    Aircraft Operating Licences

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what statutory requirements must be met by an aircraft operator before an operating licence can be issued. [26914]

    Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers sets out the criteria for granting operating licences in all EC member states. The Licensing of Air Carriers Regulations 1992 (SI 1992 No. 2992) make provision for implementing the Council regulation in the United Kingdom.

    Aircraft Leasing

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many requests for (a) dry leasing and (b) wet leasing of aircraft have been refused by (i) his Department and (ii) the Civil Aviation Authority for each of the last five years. [26907]

    The following table shows the number of lease applications which have been refused approval over the last five years:

    CAADOTTotal
    WetDryWetDry
    1991123
    1992112
    1993617
    199411
    1995325

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what procedures airlines are required to follow before they are permitted to (a) dry lease and (b) wet lease aircraft. [26906]

    M5 Viaduct

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects work to correct the structural weakness to the M5 Golden Valley viaduct between Cheltenham and Gloucester to be completed; and if he will make a statement. [27058]

    The Highways Agency programme is to strengthen or replace the structure during the years 1997–98 and 1998–99, subject to resources being available.Lane and weight restrictions are in force on the structure to limit traffic loading.Investigations have been in progress since the loading restrictions were imposed to determine the levels and extent of structural weakness. These investigations are part of the exercise to establish whether it is most cost effective to strengthen or replace the structure.

    Greenford Roundabout

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what work is currently being undertaken at the Greenford roundabout; at what cost; and if he will make a statement. [26745]

    These works are part of the implementation of priority (red) route measures for the A40 by the Traffic Director for London and will provide for full traffic signal control of Greenford road roundabout. The scheme is intended to create better lane discipline and reduce accidents. The cost of the scheme is approximately £210,000.

    Drivers' Licences

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list the security arrangements surrounding the issuing of drivers' licences to private car owners; and what checks the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency undertakes to ensure that a single licence number is not used by more than one person. [26770]

    The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency does not divulge details of the checks carried out before driving licences are issued. Each licence bears a driver number which uniquely identifies the holder.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on the conviction in Nottingham of an individual for a drink driving offence in Kent on the basis of a misdirected driving licence. [26901]

    Aviation Standards

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many meetings his Department has had with representatives of the Jamaican Government in respect of a service between Manchester and Jamaica. [26749]

    Negotiations were held with representatives of the Jamaican Government on 24-26 January 1996 to discuss liberalising the existing air services agreement, including a request for a possible service between Manchester and Jamaica. Agreement was not reached and both sides agreed that a further round would be held later in the year.

    Heavy Goods Vehicles

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what plans lie has to give to enforcement officers powers to seize and impound unlicensed heavy goods vehicles. [26771]

    I am considering this in the light of the report on the roadside survey of illegal operators in October 1995, which was published on 24 April.

    Network Southcentral

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport which bids for Network SouthCentral offered new rolling stock. [26701]

    Details of unsuccessful franchise bids are commercially confidential.London and South Coast Ltd. will be investing in a programme of improvements to existing rolling stock in order to improve the reliability of the Network SouthCentral fleet. Certain trains, which will be used for express London-Brighton services, will be refurbished.

    Driverregulation

    the Secretary of State for Transport what are the maximum hours (a) bus drivers and (b) lorry drivers can drive without a break; and what plans the Government have to harmonise the regulations so the same hours rules apply to both. [26775]

    For both goods and passenger vehicles to which the European Union rules apply, four and a half hours. For passenger vehicles operated under the UK rules, five and a half; for goods vehicles operated under the UK rules, there is no limit on continuous driving but a driver must not drive for more than 10 hours a day. We have no plans to change the UK rules.

    Articulated Lorries

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make the fitting of the HOPE anti-jacknifing device compulsory on articulated lorries. [26888]

    Rail Privatisation

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport for what reasons his Department published a rail privatisation update leaflet in March; how many copies of this leaflet have been published; how much they cost to produce; how they are being distributed; and, in what numbers and at what frequency his Department intends to publish further rail privatisation update leaflets. [27027]

    The rail privatisation update leaflet provides factual information to rail passengers about progress with railway privatisation and up-dates a similar leaflet published in March 1994. The leaflet has been delivered to all manned railway stations in the United Kingdom, where it has been placed in racks for customers to pick up if they wish. A total of 250,000 leaflets were produced at a cost of £19,800. Distribution costs were £7,215. The overall cost per leaflet was about 11p. We have no plans at this stage for a further leaflet.

    Magistrates Courts

    To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what plans he has to expand the computer link between magistrates courts in South Wales and traffic area offices to the rest of England and Wales. [26774]

    A joint working group which includes officials from the Department of Transport and the Lord Chancellor's Department is currently examining arrangements which would provide for the transfer of information about penalties and convictions for operators of heavy goods and passenger vehicles to be passed from the magistrates courts to the traffic area offices.Experience gained from the manual trial of transfer of information between Gwent magistrates court and South Wales traffic area office will be taken into account in the recommendations of the joint working group.