Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 332: debated on Friday 11 June 1999

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Friday 11 June 1999

Environment, Transport And The Regions

Coastguard

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions on how many occasions in the period January to April 1999 staffing levels at the Coastguard stations at (i) Oban, (ii) Liverpool, (iii) Belfast and (iv) Stornoway were maintained by the use of unqualified or partly-qualified staff. [85838]

[holding answer 8 June 1999]:

ObanLiverpoolBelfastStornoway
Unqualified
12 hour watch0400
Partly Qualified
12 hour watch09360116
6 hour watch0650
Recruits who have yet to qualify in their grade are able to perform certain tasks on watch almost immediately but under the supervision of a watch manager. Watch managers are encouraged to involve new recruits in watchkeeping tasks as much as possible.Partly Qualified Officers are those who after their initial training have demonstrated their ability to their line management to undertake certain tasks appropriate to their grade, thus enabling them to become part of a Watch. Initial training is followed by further on the job training which take place at their parent station. This on the job training as part of the Watch, or as a supernumerary, is essential preparation for an officer's final proficiency examinations for qualification to their grade.

Bus Companies

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions if he will list for each of the 17 municipally owned bus companies their (a) annual turnover, (b) passenger revenues, (c) pre-tax profit or loss, (d) numbers of staff and (e) numbers of vehicles operated. [86666]

Under the Transport Act 1985 the local authority-owned bus companies were set up as Companies Act companies working at arms length from their owners. As the details required by the Companies Acts are lodged at Companies House, my Department does not collect the data requested.

Departmental Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what proposals he has to change his departmental expenditure limits and running costs limits for 1999–2000. [86984]

Subject to Parliamentary approval of the necessary Supplementary Estimates, my departmental expenditure limits will change as follows.The voted Local Government Departmental Expenditure Limit will be increased by £3,900,000, increasing the overall limit from £34,207,667,000 to £34,211,567,000. This increase reflects revised estimates of the costs of preparing for the Greater London Authority. The increase will be offset by a corresponding reduction in the Department's Main Programmes Departmental Expenditure Limit from £9,696,757,000 to £9,692,857,000.

Greater London Authority

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what steps he is taking to provide the Greater London Authority with accommodation and administrative support. [86985]

I announced on 26 February plans for a new building for the headquarters of the Greater London Authority (GLA) at London Bridge City. Design and contractual issues are being finalised, and I anticipate the building being ready for occupation towards the end of 2001.To house the GLA before the new building is ready, my Department is arranging temporary office accommodation at Romney House, Marsham Street, London SW1, which should be ready for occupation by staff preparing for the GLA by the end of 1999.The GLA will assume its responsibilities on 3 July 2000, eight weeks after the elections, and work therefore needs to be put in hand now to establish finance and other systems and to ensure that appropriate administrative machinery is in place. I announced on 31 March that Dr. Bob Chilton would be seconded from the Audit Commission to be Head of Transition: he took up his duties on 19 April, and will work closely with my officials to take this work forward.My Department has earmarked £30 million from within existing budgets over the four years 1998–99 to 2001–02 to meet GLA preparation costs. This will cover the anticipated cost of fitting out, furnishing and equipping the new building, including professional and other specialist advice; providing temporary accommodation for the GLA; accommodating and equipping the transition team; and setting up new financial, management and communication systems for the GLA. This compares to an initial provision of £20 million, which was largely to cover the cost of providing a new building. I will provide more detailed estimates when commercial negotiations have been completed, and will report actual expenditure totals periodically.Separate provision is being made to cover the cost of the first elections to the GLA, including publicity, and establishing Transport for London and the London Development Agency. A separate announcement is being made about a loan from the Contingencies Fund in relation to some of these costs. The arrangements for establishing the Metropolitan Police Authority and the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority are matters for the Home Secretary.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what statutory authority exists for costs to be incurred by him in 1999–2000 in preparation for the establishment of the Greater London Authority and its functional and other associated bodies. [86986]

Further to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Battersea (Mr. Linton) on 2 February 1999, Official Report, column 568, pending Parliamentary approval, urgent expenditure on new services for the bodies other than the Greater London Authority in 1999–2000 estimated at £4.7 million will be met by repayable advances from the Contingencies Fund.

Sellafield

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what progress he has made in his consideration of the draft decisions submitted to him by the Environment Agency on Sellafield MOX plant. [85629]

The Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and I have looked very carefully at the recommendations made by the Environment Agency about the justification for the MOX plant. We have also examined the representations made to us about the plant. Our provisional conclusion is that the balance of the argument so far is in favour of justification. However, we have also come to the conclusion that there should be further consultations on the economic case for the plant. We were concerned that the version of the report by PA Consulting on the economic case for the plant, which had been published by the Agency in January last year, did not contain as much information as the public could reasonably expect to see. We have therefore decided to publish a fuller version of the report. We accept, however, that some material contained in the report is commercially confidential and cannot be published without potentially harming BNFL's commercial interests. This information has been omitted from the version we are publishing.In view of the time that has passed since PA Consulting completed their report, we decided to commission from BNFL an up-to-date assessment of the market for MOX fuel. This assessment is also being published. Comments are being invited on this material by 23 July after which we shall take a final decision on the full operation of the plant.While this consultation is under way, and given our view that the balance of the argument currently favours justification we have concluded that it would be right for BNFL to be allowed to proceed with the uranium commissioning of the plant. We concluded that it would be right to allow this before final conclusions are reached about whether to give the go-ahead for the full operation of the plant. This would enable BNFL to begin testing the plant before the introduction of plutonium. In this way, if the plant is eventually given the go-ahead, the delays in running the plant commercially would be minimised. If, after the consultation exercise we decide that full operation is not justified, the process would be halted and uranium removed from the plant. The costs of removal, estimated at £2 million, would be met by BNFL.

Trade And Industry

Mox Fuel Shipment (Japan)

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if the conclusions of the Environment Agency on plutonium extraction from MOX fuel were assessed by his Department when determining the security measures necessary for the shipping of MOX fuel to Japan. [86740]

The physical protection measures necessary for the shipping of MOX fuel to Japan are based on the recommendations of the International Atomic Energy Agency concerned with the movement of all Category I nuclear materials.

Telecoms Data Protection Directive

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry when he expects to be able to make available draft regulations implementing the EC Telecoms Data Protection Directive (97/66/EC). [87025]

I have placed copies of the draft regulations in the Library of the House and these are also available in the Vote office. I am also making the draft Regulations available on the DTI Website at: www.dti. gov.uk/cii/tdpd/regs2/index.htm

Offer And Ofgas

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what changes will be made to the cash and running costs limits for the Office of Electricity Regulation and the Office for Gas Regulation. [87026]

Offer: Subject to Parliamentary approval of the necessary revised Estimate, the running cost limit will be increased by £10,100,000 from £18,100,000 to £28,200,000.This increase reflects the additional resources required by the Director General of Electricity Supply for the funding of the Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements (RETA) project (£11,200,000) and an accounting adjustment in respect of VAT receipts for contracted out services (£1,100,000). The increase will be offset by additional receipts and will not therefore add to the planned total of public expenditure.Ofgas: The running cost limit for Class IX Vote 9£the Office of Gas Regulation£will be decreased by £938,000 from £12,938,000 to £12,000,000. This decrease reflects an accounting adjustment in respect of VAT receipts for contracted out services.

Small Business

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what research his Department has conducted into the awareness of Business Support services among small business owners.[86668]

DTI commissioned MORI to undertake five surveys of tracking research between 1994 and 1997 on awareness of Business Support services, including Business Link. The most recent survey was in September 1997. Each survey involved a national telephone survey of a random sample of directors of businesses with between 10 and 200 employees in England, with a smaller sample of businesses with between five and nine employees for comparison. Research on awareness of Business Support services has also been carried out before and after national marketing campaign exercises for Business Link.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what estimate he has made of the costs to small businesses of the change of telephone codes; and what related discussions he has had with Oftel. [86669]

The administration of the National Numbering Scheme is a matter for Oftel. Oftel has not carried out any specific research into the costs to small businesses relating to changes to telephone codes. The changes to geographic codes were made in response to the views of consumers and businesses following "Phoneday" in 1995 in order to meet additional demands for numbers. In order to minimise the costs to businesses Oftel has given long periods of notice of changes, put in place parallel running for old and new numbers and "changed number" announcements. This enables businesses to plan for the future. Oftel has consulted extensively on changes to numbering arrangements and Oftel has kept my officials fully informed.

Business Links

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what was the total expenditure of Business Links in each of the last three financial years; and what proportion of that was on (a) salaries and (b) administration. [86636]

Business Links are private, independent organisations and the Department does not collect statistics on the total expenditure of Business Links or individual elements of it.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what was his Department's total expenditure on Business Links in (a) 1997–98 and (b) 1998–99; and what expenditure is planned for 1999–2000. [86638]

The total amount of funding provided for the Business Link programme by the Department in the periods 1997–98 and 1998–99 were £129.2 million and £121.1 million respectively. For 1999–2000 the Department has earmarked £139 million for Business Link programme funding, which includes an element of funding specifically for developing services of the new Small Business Service.

Gas Suppliers

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what representations he has received concerning customers complaining that their gas supplier has been changed without their consent; what gas suppliers have been disciplined by Ofgas owing to their conduct in transferring customer accounts; and if he will make a statement. [85714]

The Department has received a number of representations from consumers complaining about the involuntary transfer of their gas supply. I have great sympathy for consumers who have experienced difficulties in this respect, and understand the worry and inconvenience that such occurrences can cause. I have asked my officials to work with Ofgas and the Gas Consumers Council to root out the causes of the problems and identify areas for action to tackle them urgently.I am determined that the industry should have in place systems which work effectively and consistently to transfer customers from existing to new suppliers without error and that these should be properly regulated. The Office of Gas Supply continually monitors industry performance and should pursue rigorously any instances of failure with the companies concerned. Action has been taken by Ofgas under both the Competition Act 1980 and the Gas Act 1986 against a number of companies to secure a commitment to improve standards of performance. I have asked the Director General for an update on the situation and on the action he has in hand.

Company Directors (Insolvencies)

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what statutory provisions regulate the ability of directors of companies which have become insolvent starting up in a similar line of business with a new company; what changes he is planning to introduce; and if he will make a statement. [86414]

A Director's involvement with a company which has become insolvent does not, of itself, preclude his or her from being a Director of a new company unless:(a) contrary to the provisions of S216 of the Insolvency Act 1986, it has the same or a similar name to the company which failed;or(b) the director has been disqualified from so acting under the Companies Directors Disqualification Act 1986.When Parliamentary time allows we plan to introduce legislation to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the procedure for disqualifying unfit company directors. There are no plans to make any other change in this area.

Genetically Modified Crops

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what advice he has received about the use of genetically modified crops in the production of cosmetics and perfumes with respect to (a) skin allergies and (b) treatments of skin complaints by antibiotics. [86671]

We have not received advice in relation to genetically modified crops and the production of cosmetics and perfumes. The number of cosmetic ingredients which may be derived from GMOs is estimated to be less than 1 per cent. However, we are supportive of the moves proposed by the European Commission Scientific Steering Committee to develop harmonised guidelines for Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) risk assessments for cosmetic products.

Cabinet Office

Correspondence

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office if he will publish the latest figures showing the volume of correspondence received by Ministers and Agency Chief Executives from hon. Members, the targets set for reply, and the percentage of replies sent within targets. [87028]

Correspondence from Members of Parliament to Ministers and Agency Chief Executives
19971998
Department or AgencyTarget set for reply (working days)Number of letters receivedPercentage of replies within targetTarget set for reply (working days)Number of letters receivedPercentage of replies with target
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food157,4237615i8,05857
Cabinet Office15341961529296
Crown Prosecution Service15398515ii6688
Department for Culture, Media and Sport182,93978183,38786
HM Customs and Excise184,2912018iii4,43916
Ministry of Defence154,7196515iv5,61953
Army Base Repair Organisation1511100
Army Personnel Centre151964154396
Defence Evaluation and Research Agency122793154279
Naval Recruiting and Training Agency1529100
Department for International Development152,99489152,61391
Department for Education and Employment1522,4607115iii19,76670
Employment Service151,837931563092
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions1531,7985815 v38,05951
DVLA729996745399
Driving Standards Agency15194781510885
Highways Agency12468711548083
Marine and Coastguard Agency152510015vi21100
Planning Inspectorate8296948vii28687
Vehicle Inspectorate1524961520100
Foreign and Commonwealth Office78,735957viii10,04085
Department of Health2014,5477620ix10,64861
NHS Pensions Agency157876154274
Medicines Control Agency103773
Home Office1516,831201517,87532
201,1752220xii87552
HM Prison Service152,70261x202,40069
UK Passport Agency1010197xi1018196
Inland Revenue183,3234018xiii6,30520
233757923xiv193100
Valuation Office237431234736
Legal Secretariat to the Law Officers153018815xv29180
Lord Chancellor's Department201,88476202,67278
Court Service201,3919920xvi1,23099
HM Land Registry20371002036100
Public Trust Office156598156398
Northern Ireland Office (including Northern Ireland Departments)102,16359102,00170
Child Support Agency10144671010487
Compensation Agency725100
Northern Ireland Prison Service104892103566
Planning Service157877106274
Rate Collection Agency5129251090
Rivers Agency151385153297
Road Service152387103597
Social Security Agency109478107093
Water Service153792104885
Office for National Statistics102699210xvii67988
President of the Council's Office15102911523088
The Scottish Office174,72265175,65060
Historic Scotland1723911736100
Scottish Courts Service171182171797
Scottish Office Pensions Agency1738971745100
Scottish Prison Service17145971711995
Student Awards Agency for Scotland17240701711250
Department of Social Security2017,585512019,33031
Benefits Agency203,31489202,79756
Child Support Agency208,18299208,365100
Contributions Agency20338892028037
War Pensions Agency20693992052998

The 1998 correspondence figures are set out in the following table. The table also sets out the figures for 1997, first published on 31 July 1998, Official Report, columns 643–46. Members' attention is drawn to the footnotes which accompany the table and which provide general background information on how totals have been calculated.

Correspondence from Members of Parliament to Ministers and Agency Chief Executives

Department of Trade and Industry

Target set for reply(working days)

Number of letters received

Percentage of replies within target

Target set for reply(working days)

Number of letters received

Percentage of replies within target

Department of Trade and Industry1019,4596110

iii22,193

50
Companies House10411001038100
Employment Tribunal Service107890
Insolvency Service10271001019100
Radiocommunications Agency1027961015100
HM Treasury154,5535415

iii7,086

37
Treasury Solicitor's Department153910015

xviii44

98
Welsh Office152,99875153,91371
CADW (Welsh Historic Monuments)126583103897

Notes on 1998 Figures

19

iIncludes correspondence for the Intervention Board.

iiIncludes those letters addressed to the Law Officers but subsequently replied to by the Director of Public Prosecutions, excluding letters addressed to the DPP.

iiiIncludes all Ministerial replies, not only replies to Members of Parliament.

ivIncludes 940 letters where Agency Chief Executives replied on Ministers' behalf. Interim replies are not included in the overall performance.

v67 per cent. of letters were replied to within 20 working days.

viFigures from 1 April 1998-31 December 1998.

viiIncludes 56 cases relating to Wales.

viiiIn addition, the FCO's migration and visa department received 9,453 letters direct from MP's in 1998, of which 47 per cent. were replied to within 15 working days.

ix1997 and 1998 figures are not directly comparable, as a new data system now provides figures relating to letters received from MPs only

xPrison Service Director General cases which includes correspondence that Ministers passed on to be answered under delegated arrangements.

xiUKPA Chief Executive cases.

xiiIncludes letters for HM Prison Service where Ministers replied.

xiiHead Office figures.

xviLocal Office and "delegated" figures (where local officials reply direct to MPs).

xvThis figure excludes letters which were subsequently replied to by the Director of Public Prosecutions.

xviIncludes letters where correspondence has been received direct to the Chief Executive or transferred to the Chief Executive for reply.

xviiIncludes 579 letters where the Chief Executive replied on Ministers' behalf.

xviiiIncludes 13 letters where the Chief Executive replied on Ministers' behalf.

19The 1997 figures are taken from the Official Report, 31 July 1998, columns 643–46. Please also refer to the notes given with that reply. Departments and Agencies which received a total of between 1 and 10 letters from MPs during 1998 are not shown in this table.

House Of Commons

Staff Pay Settlement

To ask the hon. Member for Roxburgh and Berwickshire, representing the House of Commons Commission, when the 1999 pay settlement for House of Commons staff will be implemented; and if he will make a statement. [85971]

There are four groups of House of Commons staff covered by separate pay settlements each year. They are the Senior Commons Staff (SCS), the Main Structure Staff (Pay Bands A to E), the Refreshment Department Catering Staff and the Works Directorate Craft Staff.The pay of the Senior Commons Staff is kept in line with that of the Senior Civil Service. The Government accepted the recommendations of the Senior Salaries Review Body in February and the recommended increases have been implemented with effect from 1 April 1999.The negotiations with the unions recognised to represent staff in Pay Bands A to E started in April 1999 and are continuing.The negotiations with the unions representing staff in the Craft and Catering pay bands are expected to start towards the end of June.The implementation date for all the settlements is 1 April 1999.

Social Security

Personal Documents (Confiscation)

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will list the powers he has to confiscate (a) passports, (b) national insurance cards and (c) driving licences. [86665]

The Secretary of State for Social Security has no express powers to confiscate passports, national insurance cards or driving licences. However, these documents remain the property of Her Majesty's Government. If the Secretary of State has concerns that such a document may be forged, altered or stolen, he may retain it. A receipt is issued and the appropriate authority notified.

Prime Minister

Debt Burden

To ask the Prime Minister what assessment he has made of the likely progress at the forthcoming G7 Summit in reducing the debt burden of the poorest countries; and if he will make a statement. [85724]

At the G8 Summit in Cologne next weekend I will be taking forward the UK's proposals for faster, deeper and wider debt relief to the world's poorest countries.

Kosovo And Serbia (Ground Invasion)

To ask the Prime Minister if he will make a statement on the Government's policy on a ground invasion of (a) Kosovo and (b) Serbia. [85897]

[holding answer 8 June 1999]: There is now evidence that the Yugoslav authorities are complying with the demands of the international community. My hon. Friend will be aware that following confirmation of the start of the withdrawal of Yugoslav forces from Kosovo, the NATO Secretary General ordered the suspension of the bombing campaign. An international peacekeeping force in which British troops will be at the forefront will be deployed within the timescale agreed between General Jackson and Serb military commanders on 9 June. Until this withdrawal is complete, however, we must continue to exercise caution and to keep all other options under review.

Ethnic Hungarians

To ask the Prime Minister if he will make a statement on his discussions with the Prime Minister of Hungary in relation to the safety of the ethnic Hungarians living in northern Yugoslavia, and on the concerns of the Hungarian Prime Minister about the threat to ethnic Hungarians from Serbian military forces and paramilitaries positioned near their homes.[85900]

[holding answer 8 June 1999]: I met the Hungarian Prime Minister in Downing Street on 15 April. We discussed the situation of the ethnic Hungarian community in Vojvodina. Mr. Orban said that a substantial number of ethnic Hungarians had left the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in recent years for Hungary. He expressed concern that the rights of the ethnic Hungarians in Vojvodina were inadequate and that the authorities of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia had deliberately resettled Serb refugees in areas which hitherto had an ethnic Hungarian majority.I reaffirmed the United Kingdom's support for the democratisation of the whole of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia as the best way to safeguard the rights of all its citizens.

Quarantine

To ask the Prime Minister if he will list the representations he received regarding the quarantine of the pet dog of William Dowell. [86630]

In addition to letters from William Dowell and his family, my office has received four letters on this subject, all from France.

To ask the Prime Minister what plans he has to abolish quarantine for animals entering the United Kingdom. [86631]

On 26 March, the Government announced that they were going to reform the quarantine laws in the UK. A pilot scheme is being developed for introduction as soon as possible and the main scheme will be in place by April 2001.

Council Of Europe

To ask the Prime Minister what the Government's policy is towards the development of the Council of Europe. [86645]

The Government support the development of the Council of Europe as a key institution for the promotion of the values of human rights, democracy and the rule of law throughout Europe, and for the strengthening of the political, legal, social and cultural cohesion of the continent.The enlargement of the Council of Europe's membership to include the new democracies of Eastern Europe has given it a central role in European unification. The Government believe that to take forward this role it is essential that the Council re-affirm its structures and redefine its priorities to be able to act more effectively as a force for democratic stability. The Government therefore strongly support the recommendations of the report adopted by Ministers in Budapest in May. We want to see a strong and energetic and effective Council of Europe ready to face the new millennium.

Parliamentary Answers

To ask the Prime Minister what were the reasons for the time taken in providing a full answer to the question of the hon. Member for South Holland and The Deepings (Mr. Hayes) of 20 May 1999, Official Report, column 403. [86716]

The hon. Member' s question–which asked for the figures showing that the Labour Party represents more rural constituencies than any other party–was due for answer on Tuesday 18 May and I gave a full reply two days later. The delay was due to the fact that on Monday 17 and Tuesday 18 May, I was in Bulgaria and Albania visiting British troops and meeting Kosovar refugees and the leaders of these frontline states.

Holocaust Remembrance Day

To ask the Prime Minister what plans the Government have to introduce a Holocaust Remembrance day; and if he will make a statement. [86654]

I am determined to ensure that the horrendous crimes against humanity committed during the Holocaust are never forgotten. The ethnic cleansing and killing that has taken place in Europe in recent weeks are a stark example of the need for vigilance.The Government are considering a proposal for a Holocaust Remembrance Day and I have asked my right hon. Friend the Home Secretary to consult widely about this.

Treasury

Inland Revenue

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what changes are proposed to the Inland Revenue Departmental Expenditure Limit for 1999–2000. [87027]

There are no plans to change the overall Departmental Expenditure Limit of the Inland Revenue. However, subject to Parliamentary approval of the necessary Supplementary Estimate for Class XVI, Vote 4, the Voted element of the Departmental Expenditure Limit will be increased by £46,319,000 from £1,836,316,000 to £1,882,635,000 to reflect the costs of administering working families tax credits and disabled persons tax credits from October 1999. The increase will be offset by a matching reduction in the non-voted element from £34,910,000 to -£11,409,000 reflecting the take-up of retained provision.The Supplementary Estimate is subject to the passage of the Tax Credits Bill which has been laid before Parliament. The provision will not be used until the enabling legislation has been enacted or, in the event of the legislation not passing into law, further authority has been obtained from Parliament.

Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs

Mr And Mrs Adams

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will take steps to persuade the Florida State Prosecutor to drop all charges of child abuse against Mr. and Mrs. Adams of Harrogate and obtain an apology for the way they were treated at St. Petersburg Beach, Florida. [86678]

The Government do not intervene in the judicial process of another sovereign country. This is a matter for Mr. and Mrs. Adam's lawyer. The family should address any complaints that they have about their treatment to the US authorities. They have been provided with the contact details.

Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when the hon. Member for Walsall, North will receive a reply to his letter of 27 April, ref. GU10051886.[86401]

My noble Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs wrote to my hon. Friend today.

Mox Fuel Shipments

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations have been made to him by Caribbean states over the proposed shipment of MOX fuel to Japan. [86739]

I am aware of the interest of Caribbean states on this issue, which the Government take very seriously.I have received a letter from the High Commissioner of the Bahamas on behalf of his Commonwealth Caribbean colleagues requesting a meeting to discuss this issue. Arrangements are in hand to hold such a meeting.

China

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the membership and functions of the United Kingdom/China Forum. [85835]

The UK/China Forum is a nongovernmental organisation of senior British and Chinese individuals from the worlds of politics, business, administration, academia, the media and the arts, whose purpose is to promote contacts at all levels between Britain and China and develop initiatives to build stronger links in areas where better contact will bring mutual benefit to both sides. The Forum will meet yearly.The British members of the Forum are:Right hon. Michael Heseltine PC MP, Chairman; Dr. Chris Gamble (Director, Royal Institute of International Affairs), Executive Chair; Professor David Wall (Head, Asia Programme, Royal Institute of International Affairs), Secretary General; Mr. David Brewer (Chairman, Great Britain China Centre and Chairman, British Invisibles); Sir Charles Powell (President, China Britain Business Council); Sir Len Appleyard (Vice Chairman, Barclays Capital); Mr. Martin Broughton (Chairman, Chatham House China Task Force); Mr. Ben Chapman MP (Chairman, All-Party Parliamentary Group on China); Sir William Purves; Sir Patrick Gillam (Chairman, Standard Chartered Bank); Mr. Bob Mendelsohn (Group Chief Executive, Royal and Sun Alliance); Mr. Win Bischoff (Chairman, J. H. Schroder and Co. Ltd.); Sir John Jennings; Sir Ralph Robins (Chairman, Rolls Royce); Mr. Niall Fitzgerald (Chairman, Unilever); Mr. David John (Chairman, BOC); Baroness Kennedy (Chair, British Council); Lord Puttnam (Chairman, Enigma Productions); Sir Crispin Tickell; Mr. Giles Henderson (Senior Partner, Slaughter and May) and Mr. Richard Lambert (Editor, Financial Times).The Chinese members of the Forum are:Mr. Song Jian (Vice Chairman, Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference), Chairman; Mr. Mei Zhaorong (President, People's Institute of Foreign Affairs), Executive Chairman; Mr. Xin Futan (Vice President, People's Institute of Foreign Affairs), Secretary General; Mr. Yao Zhenyan (Chairman, China-UK Group, National People's Congress); Mr. Qu Geping (Chairman, Environmental Protection Committee, National People's Congress); Mr. Xie Anshan (Member, National People's Congress Standing Committee and Legal Committee); Mr. Chen Yuan (Governor, State Development Bank); Mr. Wang Xuebing (Governor, Bank of China); Mr. Wu Chunhe (Editor-in-Chief, Economic Daily); Mr. Wang Jiming (Vice President, China Petrochemical Group); Mr. Tu Guangshao (General Manager, Shanghai Stock Exchange); Mr. Chen Zhongbiao (Chairman, China Overseas Shipping Company Group); Mr. Feng Xiaozeng (Vice Chairman, State Insurance Regulatory Committee); Mr. An Chengxin (Vice President, Chinese Council for the Promotion of International Trade); Mr. Yao Jinrong (Deputy General Manager, China International Trust and Investment Corporation); Mr. Zhang Yanzhong (Deputy General Manager, China Aviation Industry Corporation); Mr. Wang Ren (Vice President, China Academy of Agriculture); Mr. Lin Jintong (President, Beijing Post and Telecommunications University); Mr. Wang Xuan (President, Research Institute of Founder Group of Peking University); Mr. Yang Qixian (Vice President, China Society of Economic Reform) and Mr. Li Gang (Director-General, Liaison Department, Ministry of Culture).

Ambassadors (Engineering Qualifications)

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps his Department is taking to encourage men and women with engineering qualifications to enter the Diplomatic Service. [86163]

The FCO encourages a diverse range of candidates to apply to join the Diplomatic Service, so that the FCO is representative of the best of modern Britain. Applicants can have degrees in any discipline, so men and women with engineering degrees are encouraged to apply. We aim to visit each UK University every 4 to 5 years, which brings us into contact with graduates studying the whole spectrum of subjects, including engineering.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many ambassadors are chartered engineers. [86162]

The Senior Management Structure of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office includes one officer who has qualified as a Chartered Engineer. No current Ambassador has this qualification.

Provisional Agendas (European Councils)

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will account for the delay in replying to the questions from the right hon. Member for Penrith and The Border, 19 May 1999, Official Report, columns 349–50, [84699 and 84697]; and if a provisional agenda was available at the time of the holding answers. [85631]

Holding replies were given to these questions as the Minister was overseas. The substantive answers were given the following day.

Wales

Departmental Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what changes he is proposing to make to the Departmental Expenditure Limit for the Welsh Office and the Office of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools in Wales for the current financial year. [87029]

Subject to Parliament's approval of the related Revised Estimate, the Welsh Office Departmental Expenditure Limit for 1999–2000 will be increased by £30,800,000 from £7,061,717,000 to £7,092,517,000, including a transfer from the Department for Education and Employment Class I, Vote 1 to take account of the change to student support arrangements following the Dearing Review of higher education.The increase will be offset by a transfer and will not add to the overall level of planned total public expenditure.

Scotland

Fishing

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what consultations were undertaken with fishing organisations in advance of the Scottish Adjacent Waters Boundaries Order 1999.[85527]

A press release was issued at the time the draft order was laid, on 8 March 1999. All fishing organisations were therefore able to comment on the draft Order between that date and the Order being approved by the Privy Council on 13 April 1999. None did so.

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what rights in respect of consultation are available to Scottish fishermen operating in the areas of sea, responsibility for which is transferred by the Scottish Adjacent Water Boundaries Order 1999 with regard to oil, gas and other subsea operations. [85531]

Under the Petroleum Act 1998, the Department of Trade and Industry is required in considering various oil and gas activities to have regard to the implications for other users of the sea including the fishing industry. Historically there has been appropriate consultation with representatives of the Scottish fishing industry through the Scottish Office. These consultation arrangements will continue through the Scottish Executive.

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement on the impact on activities of the Scottish Fisheries Protection Agency of the Scottish Adjacent Waters Boundaries Order 1999. [85529]

Officers of the Scottish Fisheries Protection Agency (SFPA) remain British Sea Fisheries Officers and, as such, will be empowered to operate anywhere within British fisheries limits. In practice, SFPA vessels will patrol down to the new median line, but they will have powers of pursuit outwith the Scottish zone.

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will set out the reallocation of responsibilities between the United Kingdom Parliament and the Scottish Parliament as a result of the Scottish Adjacent Water Boundaries Order 1999. [85528]

The Order makes statutory provision for the first time for a Scottish zone of British fisheries limits. By doing so it helps define the functions of Scottish Ministers and the responsibilities of the Scottish Parliament. Responsibility for the regulation of sea fisheries issues, including measures implemented under the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), will be devolved to the new Scottish Parliament within the zone, and in respect of Scottish boats outwith the zone.

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement setting out the effects on the jurisdiction of the Scottish courts for waters in the area of sea transferred by the Scottish Adjacent Water Boundaries Order 1999. [85530]

It remains possible for prosecutions for most alleged offences to be taken anywhere in the UK. The current practice is normally to refer the prosecution case folder to the nearest court to where the offence took place. This is likely to continue to be the case.

Departmental Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what plans he has to amend the Office of the Secretary of State for Scotland and transfers to the Scottish consolidated fund departmental expenditure limits/running costs provision for 1999–2000. [87024]

Subject to Parliamentary approval of the necessary Revised Estimates, the gross running costs provision for Class XIII, Vote 1 will be increased by £175,000 from £2,400,000 to £2,575,000. The increase is in respect of an increase in appropriations in aid from: VAT recoveries, fees and costs for legal work done by solicitors and receipts of rents and a transfer of £55,000 from Current Grants for the cost of Private Legislation Procedure. The running costs limit and the Departmental Expenditure Limit will be increased by £55,000 from £2,400,000 to £2,455,000. This will be offset by a corresponding reduction in expenditure by the Scottish Parliament within the Departmental Expenditure Limit from £13,807,018,000 to £13,806,963,000.

International Development

Balkans (Reconstruction)

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what European Union support is being given for longer-term reconstruction in the Balkans; and if she will make a statement. [86478]

The EU has provided 4,185 million euros for the reconstruction of the region since the end of the Bosnian conflict. In 1999, 170 million euros were allocated for the reconstruction of the countries of the former Yugoslavia.The EU is reviewing its plans to take into account the consequences of the Kosovo crisis. The proposed Stability Pact for South East Europe will provide a framework for the regeneration of the Balkan region. The EU will play a key role in this process and in the financing of the international reconstruction effort in Kosovo.

Tobacco

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how much British aid money has been invested in agricultural projects in developing countries which include the growing of tobacco crops for each year over the last five years. [86212]

Our policy is that development funds must not be used for any purpose which supports the tobacco sector. In line with this requirement, no British development money has been invested in bilateral projects which include the growing of tobacco crops in developing countries in any of the past 5 years.

Aid: Gnp Ratio

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what official development assistance was provided by the UK in 1998 as a percentage of GNP; and what the performance was of other members of OECD's Development Assistance Committee. [86981]

As announced yesterday by the Development Assistance Committee of the OECD, the UK's expenditure on official development assistance (ODA) in 1998 is estimated at £2,315 million, representing 0.27 per cent. of GNP. This is an increase on the 1997 figure of 0.26 per cent. and reflects the Government's commitment to reverse the decline in UK development assistance. The average ODA/GNP ration for all OECD DAC Member Countries was 0.23 per cent. We will continue our strenuous efforts to also improve the effectiveness of international development programmes.The figures exclude financial flows to countries in transition in Central and Eastern Europe and more advanced developing countries as defined in the DAC List of Aid Recipients.

Health

Guild Community Trust, Preston

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what discussions he has had with the North West Regional Health Authority on the appointment of independent investigators to report on administration of the Guild Community Trust Preston during 1998 and 1999; and if he will make a statement; [85139](2) in what ways he involved the Chairman of the North West Regional Health Authority in seeking the resignations of the non-executive directors of the Guild Community Trust Preston;[85224](3) if he will list the grounds on which he dismissed the Board of the Guild Community Trust Preston; [85223](4) if he will list those occasions on which the non-executive directors of the Guild Community Trust Preston sought advice on the way the trust was being run from the North West Regional Health Authority; and what advice was given; [85136](5) if he will publish the correspondence between his Department, the North West Regional Health Authority and the Chief Executive of the Guild Community Trust Preston during 1998 and 1999 on the Chief Executive's administration of the trust during this period; [85137](6) if he will list the

(a) meetings and (b) communications between his Department and the Chief Executive of the Guild Community Trust Preston during 1998 and 1999 and state the reasons for each of those meetings and communications; [85138]

(7) what reports his Department has received on the administration of the Guild Community Trust Preston in its last two years; and what were their conclusions. [85140]

[holding answer 25 May 1999]: A mental health report which appeared in the summer of 1998 raised concerns about the management of Guild Community Healthcare NHS Trust and, specifically, its Chief Executive. The Trust Board, after consultation with the NHS Executive North West, took the decision to suspend the Chief Executive and commission an independent panel to investigate his management style.The independent Galbraith Report was presented to the non-executive team in December 1998. It concluded that there had been a clear and significant loss of confidence in the trust's Chief Executive and that his position had become untenable. Then the Chairman of the Trust resigned. I have received briefings from the North West Regional Office of the NHS about the investigation which was commissioned by, and reported to, the Guild Trust Board.The circumstances at the Guild Trust, Preston were the subject of letters, e-mails, telephone and face-to-face conversations involving non-executive directors of the trust, officials at the NHS North West Regional Office and officials in my Department over a lengthy period.In May the non-executive directors of the Guild Trust were asked to resign in the best interests of the NHS and the staff and patients of the trust because there had been an irreversible breakdown in relations with one another. Two agreed to resign and I dismissed the three who refused.

The Chairman of the North West Region of the NHS, who is my representative in these matters, was involved at all stages in my consideration of the situation at the Guild Trust and my decision to seek the resignations of the non-executive directors.

The Department, including the NHS Executive North West, communicates on a regular basis with NHS Trusts about management issues. The extent and diversity of these contacts make it impractical to compile a definitive list.

Staffordshire Ambulance Service

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what steps he is taking to ensure that the impact of the use of computerised systems in respect of call-outs by Staffordshire Ambulance service is disseminated to other ambulance services in the United Kingdom; [85537](2) what assessment he has made of the response rate times achieved by Staffordshire Ambulance service. [85536]

Staffordshire Ambulance service has reported impressive response times which we commend. Information about its work, including its use of computerised systems, has been widely disseminated through publication of its response times, presentation of its results to Ministers by the chief executive, and at a national meeting of health authority commissioners focusing on its methods.Other ambulance services in England have adopted the approaches promoted by Staffordshire.

Mmr Vaccine

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what research has been conducted by, or on behalf of, his Department into the health risks of the use of bovine serum in the manufacture of MMR vaccines. [85534]

No research specific to bovine material and measles, mumps and rubella vaccine has been conducted by, or on behalf of, the Department of Health. All bovine blood products used in the manufacture of MMR vaccines comply with European guidelines on minimising the risk of transmitting agents causing spongiform encephalopathies via medicinal products, which address the sourcing and processing of bovine material used in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals. The product used in the manufacture of MMR vaccine is not serum, but bovine albumin. This is not United Kingdom sourced.

Royal Shrewsbury Hospital

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients at the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital were referred for radiotherapy treatment in each year from 1989 to date; and if he will make a statement. [85695]

The Department does not collect information about numbers of patients referred for radiotherapy. The following information indicates first out-patient referrals for clinical oncology at Royal Shrewsbury Hospital (only available since 1994–95), a proportion of whom will have been referred for radiotherapy treatment.

Consultant first outpatient attendance

Year

Seen

Did not appear

1994–953503
1995–964925
1996–971,11527
1997–9863221

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) when the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital will be informed of the outcome of its bid for a linear accelerator; and if he will make a statement; [85698](2) pursuant to the letter of 12 April from the Under-Secretary of State for Health, if his officials have considered the financial terms of funding a second linear accelerator at the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital; and if he will make a statement; [85696](3) what reasons underlie the length of time taken by the NHS Executive, West Midlands Regional Office to consider the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital's business case for funding to replace its cobalt unit with a new linear accelerator; and if he will make a statement. [85716]

The National Health Service Executive–West Midlands Regional Office is carefully considering the business case and hopes to make a decision as soon as possible. The prime consideration will be establishing a safe and sustainable service. There are several factors underpinning this, and the Regional Office needs to satisfy itself that all the issues have been addressed before approving the business case. In particular, the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, which is not itself a cancer centre, will need to demonstrate that robust working links have been developed with the North Staffordshire cancer centre. In addition, work currently taking place on developing a national framework for radiotherapy services, as well as wider regional cancer strategy will inform the decision. The Royal Shrewsbury Hospital will be informed as soon as a decision has been reached.West Midlands Regional Office is currently exploring possible sources of funding to minimise delay should the business case be approved.

Running Costs

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what is the estimated combined annual running costs in the last financial year of the (a) Commission for Health Improvement and (b) National Institute for Clinical Excellence; and if he will make a statement. [85737]

The Commission for Health Improvement will be established by the Health Bill currently before Parliament, and incurred no running costs in the last financial year. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence was established on 1 April this year and did not incur any running costs in the last financial year.

Viagra

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the guidelines are for the issue of Viagra on NHS prescription, with particular reference to the general practitioner's discretion. [86301]

Subject to Parliamentary approval, from 1 July changes will be incorporated in schedule 11 of the National Health Service (General Medical Services) Regulations 1992 which will specify those categories of patients for whom general practitioners may prescribe drug treatments for impotence, including Viagra, on the NHS.

Asthma

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what data his Department collects on childhood asthma; and if he will set out the figures for the last 10 years. [86407]

There are no comprehensive data on the number of children with asthma. The Department's Central Health Monitoring Unit brought together a broad range of the best statistics on asthma in "Asthma: An Epidemiological Overview" (1995), copies of which are available in the Library. This report quotes an estimate, on the basis of all the information available, that

"the prevalence of asthma sufficiently severe to require regular medical supervision is from 4–6 per cent. in children".
The Department routinely collects data on hospital in-patient care for asthma. The numbers (in thousands) of hospital in-patient cases (ie finished consultant episodes—ordinary admissions and day cases) in which asthma was the main diagnosis (ICD 10 codes J45 and J46 from 1995–96; ICD 9 code 493 before that) in England for the last ten years for which figures are available, among children aged 0 to 4 years and 5 to 14 years, are given in the table:
Age group0–45—14
1988–8938.823.0
1989–9032.718.8
1990–9132.316.7
1991–9232.118.5
1992–9331.916.2
1993–9432.517.5
1994–9528.614.8
1995–9628.715.2
1996–9725.712.0
1997–9820.412.5

Notes:

1. Figures for 1995–96 and earlier years are grossed for both coverage and unknown/invalid clinical data; 1996–97 and 1997-98 figures are provisional and ungrossed (no adjustments have yet been made for shortfalls in data).

2. A finished consultant episode (FCE) is defined as a period of patient care under the care of an individual consultant within one health care provider. FCE figures do not represent the number of patients as a person may have more than one episode of care during the year.

Source:

Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES), Department of Health

The Department also commissions the annual Health Survey for England, copies of the reports of which are also available in the Library. The surveys for 1995, 1996 and 1997 included questions on asthma. According to the report of the 1997 Survey, 23 per cent. of boys and 18 per cent. of girls aged 2 to 15 years had been diagnosed at some time in the past as suffering from asthma.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what research his Department has carried out on asthma in young children; and what plans he has for further research. [86406]

The Department, the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions and the Medical Research Council are jointly funding a major research initiative on the relationship between air pollution and respiratory disease. The National Asthma Campaign is managing, on behalf of the National Health Service Executive, the NHS National research and development programme on asthma management. Many of the research projects commissioned under these initiatives will be pertinent to asthma in children.The Medical Research Council which receives most of its income via grant-in-aid from the Office of Science and Technology in the Department of Trade and Industry also spends about £2 million a year on research into prevention and treatment of asthma and related areas.

Medical Equipment (Registration)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans his Department has to require health authorities which produce or modify medical equipment to obtain a CE Mark registration before the equipment is issued. [86677]

Any health authority which places medical devices on the market must comply with the requirements of the Medical Devices Regulations and CE mark their product accordingly.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which companies or Government organisations his Department has exempted from the requirement to obtain CE Marks for medical equipment. [86676]

None. All manufacturers or other organisations who place medical devices on the United Kingdom market must go through the appropriate conformity assessment procedure detailed in the Medical Devices Regulations and CE mark their products accordingly. Health care establishments who make a device for their own use in-house are not regarded as having placed a product on the market.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans he has to make the list of medical equipment which has obtained a CE Mark available for public inspection. [86674]

As required by the Medical Devices Regulations, the Medical Devices Agency maintains a register only of manufacturers of low risk and custom-made devices and assemblers who have a place of business in the United Kingdom. Article 20 of the Medical Devices Directive prevents data on this register being made publicly available.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what guidance his Department has issued to health authorities about the need to obtain CE Marks for medical equipment. [86675]

In January 1998 the National Health Service Executive issued an Executive Letter (EL(98)5) to all health authorities reminding them of their responsibilities under the Medical Devices Regulations. In addition the Medical Devices Agency has produced a Guide for Health Care Professionals on the CE marking of Medical Devices together with a leaflet on the CE mark plus a Bulletin on the application of the Regulations on the activities of health care establishments. Copies of these documents are available in the Library.

Water Fluoridation

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many water authorities fluoridate their water; what guidance he gives to water authorities on this practice; what plans he has to change the law regarding water fluoridation; and if he will make a statement.[86411]

In England six Water Undertakers provide fluoridated water to some of the populations they serve–Northumbria, North West, Severn Trent, South Staffordshire, Anglian and Thames.Under the Water Industry Act 1991 health authorities are required to consult:

the appropriate local authorities
the community health councils
and any other local bodies the HA considers appropriate.

In addition the HA must publicise its proposals for water fluoridation through the local press and invite public comment. It is important to ensure that the publicity covers all parts of the area to be fluoridated, and reaches as many people as possible. The HA must allow a period of at least three months for this consultation process before it makes its final decision. Once it has completed consultation and formally adopted a policy in favour of water fluoridation, the HA must then in writing request the water company to implement the scheme.

The Government will make a policy statement on fluoridation in the Public Health White Paper, which will be published shortly.

Beta Interferon

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when he expects that the National Institute for Clinical Excellence will report to him on the use of beta interferon; and if he will make a statement. [86483]

The initial work programme and, therefore, the timing of guidance on any specific procedure for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence has not been finally determined, although it is likely that beta interferon will be referred to NICE.

Homeopathy

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what steps are being taken to recognise at consultant level those practitioners with extensive experience in homeopathic medicine gained before 1 January 1997; [86326](2) what provision there is for the training of orthodox physicians in their conventional path of accreditation in homeopathy and complementary medicine; [86329](3) if homeopathic medicine is recognised as a specialty in the United Kingdom. [86327]

There is currently no statutory training path for doctors in homeopathy in the United Kingdom, although consultants in homeopathy have been appointed in the National Health Service. Since 1 January 1997 it has been a requirement to be on the General Medical Council's Specialist Register in order to be eligible for appointment as a substantive NHS consultant. Doctors holding substantive NHS consultant appointments in homeopathy before 31 December 1998 were able to apply for inclusion in the Register under transitional provisions in the European Specialist Medical Qualifications Order 1995 (as amended). New consultants in homeopathy would ordinarily expect to be trained in another medical specialty recognised for the purposes of specialist registration, as well as in the non-statutory requirements for homeopathy.The requirements for specialist medical education are governed by European Directive 93/16/EEC. The practice of homeopathy varies greatly across the European Economic Area, and there is no provision within the Directive to recognise homeopathy for the purposes of medical training. The Faculty of Homeopathy has previously indicated its intention to develop a nationally recognised training programme in homeopathy. In order to do so, the Faculty would need to satisfy the Specialist Training Authority of the Medical Royal Colleges (STA) that the training programme met the requirements of Directive 93/16/EEC. It would then be for the STA to apply to the Secretary of State for Health for inclusion of the specialty in the European Specialist Medical Qualifications Order 1995 (as amended).

Home Department

Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he intends to reply to the letters dated 19 March, 23 March and 22 April from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mr. H. Eljack, 5 Oundle Close. [86409]

I wrote to my right hon. Friend, on 10 June 1999. Mr. Winnick: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the hon. Member for Walsall, North will receive a reply to his letter of 27 April, ref. 7518/99. [86400]

I am sorry that my hon. Friend has not yet received a reply to his letter of 27 April. I will be replying shortly setting out the full background to this case.

Ford Open Prison

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what criteria are used to decide which prisoners should serve their sentence in Ford Open Prison. [86711]

Ford prison is an open prison and accepts adult male category D prisoners. The current arrangements for the categorisation and allocation of adult male prisoners are set out in chapter 7 of Prison Service Order 2200, a copy of which is available in the Library.Allocation criteria for individual establishments are agreed between the area manager and the governor of the prison. They vary according to local circumstances. The criteria for acceptance at Ford prison are listed as follows:

There is no maximum sentence length, but prisoners must be within three years of their parole eligibility date;
prisoners serving a sentence for a sex offence or an offence of arson will not be accepted;
prisoners serving sentences for violent offences will be accepted only on progressive moves from closed establishments, and where their conduct during their sentence has indicated their suitability;
prisoners should have no history of escape or abscond, and no failure on temporary release in the previous three years; and
prisoners will not be accepted if they require full time medical care. They should be fit for most forms of work.

Domestic Violence

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the impact that advertisements implying a pleasure for women in male roughness have on his efforts to avert domestic violence; and if he will make a statement. [86477]

No such assessment has been made but nobody should believe that violence against women is either acceptable or enjoyed by the victims. There can be no excuse for such conduct. It is so serious because it is so often committed in what should be the "safety" of the victim's home, even in front of children, by a partner to whom the victim should be able to look for support and protection.The "Break the Chain" campaign launched this year made clear the Government's determination to tackle domestic violence. The leaflet has been so much in demand that we are having to reprint it as a matter of urgency.

Senator Pinochet

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his answer of 9 February 1999, Official Report, column 144, to the hon. Member for Chesham and Amersham (Mrs. Gillan), what was the role of the fourth officer at the arrest of Senator Pinochet. [86752]

As indicated in the my reply of 9 February 1999 to the hon. Member for Chesham and Amersham (Mrs. Gillan), Official Report, column 144, only two officers were present. They were the head of the Metropolitan Police Extradition Squad and another member of the Squad.

999 Calls

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many 999 calls were received in each of the last three years by (a) police forces and (b) the Metropolitan Police; and if he will make a statement. [86653]

I refer my hon. Friend to the reply I gave the right hon. Member for Berwick-upon-Tweed (Mr. Beith) on 19 March 1999, Official Report, columns 824–26.

Targeted Policing Bids

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list those areas which (a) have successfully bid for additional funding for the targeted policing initiative, and how much has been allocated in each case and (b) submitted unsuccessful bids; and if he will make a statement. [86124]

Of the £250 million three year Crime Reduction Programme which we announced on 21 July 1998, £32 million has been earmarked for the targeted policing initiative. The aim of this initiative is to help police forces, in collaboration with local crime and disorder partnerships, to improve the way in which they tackle crime. Rather than only responding to crime and dealing with its immediate consequences, the challenge is to reduce it by analysing the real crime problem and tackling its underlying causes. To this end we will be funding some 20 developmental projects over the next three years with an emphasis on developing and testing our new, effective and cost effective targeted policing tactics.On 11 November last year, we wrote to all chief constables in England and Wales, copied to police authorities and local authority Chief Executives, inviting them to submit proposals under the first of two competitions in the targeted policing initiative. A total of 32 police forces submitted 73 outline proposals for funding a range of targeted policing initiatives in their areas. The bids contained a good mix of problems to be tackled and possible approaches to tackling them.The proposals were assessed against the published criteria by a specially convened panel comprising representatives from the Home Office, the Association of Chief Police Officers, Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and the Local Government Association. The panel identified 11 proposals (table 1) as strong contenders for further development and which are currently undergoing validation and development with the help of independent consultants appointed by the Home Office. The development of the proposals is due to be completed shortly and I expect to be able to announce the final results by the end of June.The shortlisted proposals have an estimated bid cost to the crime reduction programme of £5.2 million, however the final allocation of funding will not be known until the development work is completed.The 62 bids not selected for further development at this stage are shown in table 2. Of these, four have been designated by the assessment panel as reserve projects in case any of the 11 projects are not selected.

Table 1: Crime reduction programme–Targeted policing initiative–Phase 1 Recommended Projects

£000

Partners:

Police

Region

Topic

Bid from CRP

Resources levered in

1 Rhondda Cynon Raff CBCSouth WalesWalesPartnership strategy to reduce crime and disorder problems associated with childrens homes500575
2 Cardiff CC/Bro Taf Health AuthoritySouth WalesWalesReduction of street violence within the City of Cardiff498305
3 Kingston-upon-Hull CCHumbersideYorkReduction of anti-social behaviour and low level criminal behaviour 406361
4 Calderdale MBC and Community safety PartnershipWest YorkshireYorkReduction of Vehicle Crime138475
5 Stoke-on-Trent UA/Community safety PartnershipStaffordshireW MidReduction of acquisitive crime412645
6 Islington/Camden/SouthwarkMetropolitanLondonReducing youth disorder and auto crime in the boroughs542967
7 Greenwich/Merton/Tower Hamlets/HoimslowMetropolitanLondonReduction on racially motivated crime1,0028,000
8 HackneyMetropolitanLondonReducing 'hot spots' in the borough generated by luse of crackk cocaine7601,380
9 Tyndale Dc and Parish CouncilsNorthumbriaNETackling crime and disorder in rural locations40240
10 Medway CouncilKentSEReduction of acquisitive crime by disruption of market45050
11 Stockport MDCGMPNWReduction of acquisitive crime by disruption of marketing using Crackdown Consolidation Cycle technique445447
5,19313,445

table 2: Crime reduction programme—Targeted policing initiative—Phase 1 Reserve projects

£000

Partners:

Police

Region

Topic

Bid from CRP

Resources levered in

Reading BCThames ValleySEYouth crime, disorder, and educational disruption in South Reading5440
Wide range of linked agenciesDyfed-PowysWelshUsing Automatic Number Plate Recognition cameras to target police resources against travelling criminals and drug dealers789736
Luton BC/Safer Luton PartnershipBedfordshireEastReduction of vehicle crime and associated issues4691,272
Leeds CC and Community Safety PartnershipWest YorkshireYorkMulti Agency approach to areas of high victimisation570726
2,3722,734

Table 2: Crime reduction programme–Targeted policing initiative–Phase 1 Non-selected proposals

Partners

Police

Area

Region

British CC and Chamber of CommerceAvon and SomersetBristol N, S and CentralSW
British City CouncilAvon and SomersetBristol N, S and CentralSW
Luton BCBedfordshireLutonEast
Warrington BC and othersCheshireWarringtonNW
Redcar/ClevelandClevelandCleveland Police forceNE
Cumbria CC and localCumbriaCumbrian Police force areaNW
Derby CC/Other localDerbyshireDerby DivisionE Mid
Devon CC Cornwall CCDevon and CornwallDevon/Cornwall PoliceSW
Poole Borough and CountyDorsetPooleSW
DCs of Wear ValleyDurhamWear and Tees DivisionNE

Table 2: Crime reduction programme—Targeted policing initiative—Phase 1 Non-selected proposals

Partners

Police

Area

Region

DCs of DurhamDurhamDurham Police force area NE
Force Area Agencies Dyfed-PowysForce AreaWales
Manchester CCGreater ManchesterN and s ManchesterNW
portsmouth City CouncilHampshirePortsmouth SouthSE
St. Albans CC/Herts CCHertfordshireSt. AlbansEast
Herts CC Herts ProbationHertfordshireHertfordshire Police forceEast
S. HumberHumbersideScunthorpeEast
NE Lincolnshire CouncilHumbersideGrimsby, CleethorpesYork
Kingston-upon-Hull CCHumbersideKingston-upon-HullYork
Kent CC/Youth ServiceKentWest Kent SE
Kent CC/Thanet DcKentThanetSE
Kent CC/CanterburyKentCanterburySE
Thanet DC/CanterburyKentCanterbury/ThanetSE
Blackburn BCLancashireBlackburn with DarwenNW
Blackpool BCLancashireBlackpool Town CentreNW
Lancaster CC/LancashireLancashireLancasterNw
Lancashire CC/otherLancashirePennine Police DivisionNW
Leicester City CouncilLeicestershireAreas of LeicesterE Mid
Liverpool City CouncilMerseysideLiverpoolNW
St. HelensMerseysideSt.HelensNW
St. HelensMerseysideSt.HelensNW
Lewisham/RedbridgeMetropolitanLBs of LewishamLondon
York CC and Uni; saferNorth YorkshireCity of YorkYork
York Cc LEA; SaferNorth YorkshireCity of YorkYork
Sunderland City CouncilNorthumbriaSunderland CityNE
N Tyneside CouncilNorthumbriaNorth TynesideNE
Gateshead MBCNorthumbriaGateshead WestNW
S Tyneside CommunityNorthumbriaSouth Tyneside AreaNE
Gateshead MBCNorthumbriaGateshead EastNE
Notts CC and localNottinghamshireNottinghamshire PoliceE Mid
Local Country and BoroughSouth walesS Wales Police force areaWelsh
Barnsley MBC/ChamberSouth YorkshireS Yorkshie Police forceYork
Rotherham MBC, YouthSouth YorkshireRotherham East and WestYork
E staffs BC, Prob SerStaffordshireBurton upon TrentW Mid
Surrey CC/Surrey HealthSurreyGuildfor/Waverley/EastSE
Various SussexSussexEastbourneSE
Reading BCThames ValleyReadingSE
Aylesbury DC/Bucks CCThames ValleyAylesburySE
ycombe/chilternThames ValleyChiltern ValeSE
W Berkshire CouncilThames ValleyNewburySE
Slough BcThames ValleySloughSE
Members of localWarwickshireWarwickshire Police forceW Mid
Stratford-upon-AvonWarwickshireStratford-upon-AvonW Mid
Nuneaton BC/NWarwickshireNorthern Area CommandW Mid
Warwick District SafetyWarwickshireN and S WarwickW Mid
Wychavon/WorcesterWest MerciaWorcesterWM
Birmingham City CouncilWest MidlandsBirminghamW Mid
Sandwell MBC/SaferWest MidlandsSandwellWM
Birmingham LA,LEAWest MidlandsSW BirminghamW Mid
Leeds City CouncilWest YorkshireLeedsyork
City of Bradford MDCWest YorkshireBradford City CentreYork
Kirklees MCWest YorkshireHuddersfield/DewsburyYork

Defendants

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many, and what percentage of, criminal prosecutions were completed in (a) magistrates' courts, and (b) higher courts, in each of the last five years for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement. [86122]

Information taken from the Home Office Court Proceedings Database is given in the table.

Number and percentage1 of defendants proceeded against for all offences where case was completed by type of court, England and Wales, 1993–97

Thousand and percentage

Year

Defendants where proceeding completed in magistrats' court

2

Defendants tried in the Crown Court

1993
Number1,870.383.1
Percentage964

Number and percentage1 of defendants proceeded against for all offences where case was completed by type of court, England and Wales, 1993–97

Thousand and percentage

year

Defendants where proceeding completed in magistrate' courts

2

Defendants tried in the Crown Court

1994

Number1,858.585.9
Percentage964

1995

Number1,757.389.0
Percentage955

1996

Number1,838.285.9
Percentage964

1997

Number1,76.791.3
Percentage955

1Rates as a proportion of those cases completed at both magistrates' courts and the Crown Court.

2 Excluding defendants committed for trial.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many indictable offences have been dealt with by either magistrates courts or the Crown Court serving (a) Croydon, (b) Gloucester and (c) Liverpool since 30 September 1998. [85763]

Number of persons convicted of offences involving the supply or possession of drugs at (a) Liverpool, (b) Croydon and (c) Gloucester magistrates' courts and Crown Court Centres by type of offence, October-December 19981, January-March 19991
CourtPeriodPossession of a controlled drugSupply of a controlled drugPossession with intent to supply a controlled drug
Magistrates' courts
(a) LiverpoolOctober-December 19982401827
(b) CroydonOctober-December 19987828
(c) GloucesterOctober-December 19982812
Crown Court
(a) LiverpoolOctober-December 1998222628
January-March 1999184428
(b) CroydonOctober-December 19985615
January-March 199951218
(c) GloucesterOctober-December 19984
January-March 19992121Provisional

Dna Samples

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many DNA samples have been taken of people (a) charged and (b) cautioned, in each police area and in total in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. [86125]

The annual totals (Table A) are based upon the information submitted with each DNA sample sent by individual police forces to the Forensic Science Service. The information shows whether someone has been "cautioned" or "not cautioned". The term "not cautioned" can mean the individual has been suspected,

Information taken from the Home Office Court Proceedings Database is given in the table.

Information taken from the Home Office Court Proceedings Database is given in the table.

Table A: Number of defendants proceeded against for indictable offences at Croydon, Gloucester and Liverpool magistrates, courts, October-December 19981
Magistrates' courtsNumber proceeded against
(a) Croydon728
(b) Gloucester413
(c) Liverpool1,912
Table B: Number of defendants tried for indictable offences at Croydon, Gloucester and Liverpool Crown Court Centres, October-December 19981, January-March 19991
Crown Court CentresPeriodTotal tried
(a) CroydonOctober-December 1998315
January-March 1999309
(b) GloucesterOctober-December 199878
January-March 199992
(c)LiverpoolOctober-December 1998831
January-March 19997831Provisional

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many offenders have been convicted of offences involving the supply or possession of drugs in either the magistrates court or the relevant Crown Court serving (a) Liverpool, (b) Croydon and (c) Gloucester since 30 September 1998. [85768]convicted, charged or informed that he will be reported for a recordable offence. It is, therefore, not possible to provide precise figures for

(a).

The cumulative totals for the past five years (Table B) are based upon the number of samples received by the Forensic Science Service from each force. As neither individual forces nor the Association of Chief Police Officers retain information about the number of samples actually taken, the information in the table is the most reliable indicator available of the number taken and submitted to the Forensic Science Service for analysis. The cumulative totals in (Table B) cover the period to March 1999 only and therefore, differ slightly from those in (Table A) which include additional months.

Table A: Samples submitted annually by police forces—1995 to 1999

Samples per year

First columns relates to 'cautioned', second to 'not cautioned'

Force

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

Avon and Somerset221,728831,9574093,5876795,5003232,536
Bedfordshire31,042249121241,11601120
Cambridgeshire121,540301,8901631,8953141,8731111,604
Cheshire5955542,9861962,7351951,57010
Cleveland611,929751,7571231,6641811,09337449
Cumbria241519790761,2502182,20860719
Derbyshire114,240243,8243903,6814984,1311951,482
Devon and Cornwall732,676413,1256363,4426083,6673221,676
Dorset06719724237953083114265
Durham131,232131,1102242,4956463,25911177
Dyfed-Powys411,86092,4071682,6044092,190114819
Essex82,461202,2655653,9467584,0532791,452
Gloucestershire18851861501,0242101,484113542
GMP582,1793358,3037127,7012931,72707
Gwent41,81982,3211162,5283681,886140715
Hampshire42,83783,4541224,3203554,1551571,426
Hertfordshire421,121731,128521,227851,25227429
Humberside71,2623106,2371,9198,3132,2305,4667161,828
Kent122,363953,1613512,80711203
Lancashire1003,2562425,2893664,4621952,06916
Leicestershire31,818192,359702,4171842,7011401,101
Lincolnshire041861,404231,583441,46429456
Metropolitan8015,79613316,3871,07019,4565,95229,1522,52011,809
City of London2971,4674001,6477101,4376331,280232505
Mersey12,959594,3241092,4114465,6241642,153
Norfolk151,010593,5044754,0811,0693,7915111,604
Northamptonshire11,62701,7761702,6892692,558117748
Northumbria23,3211435,7012233,3613383,5331351,469
North Wales81,75111,9361101,9795092,484197989
North Yorkshire291,335161,535501,6741121,53931643
Nottinghamshire3399181,4232683,9762536705
South Wales95,9882388,2227696,9271301,53817191
South Yorkshire42,841112,8943745,8332,5829,4401941,177
Staffordshire01,19621,048711,8681,0917,4845123,294
Suffolk220439661811,6576749502
Surrey45562674681,783761,37912279
Sussex142,613292,644931,898931,11984689
Thames Valley182,758523,045812,4671972,1062721,428
Warwickshire04310488718491301,04342352
West Mercia252,313231,907821,8071941,849110855
West Midlands362,7607707,2581,20810,2662,74613,1551,3335,242
West Yorkshire665,6621887,3897828,5341,2869,1913633,143
Wiltshire11,27141,145171,4012778601

Table B: Cumulative figures by police force—April 1995 to March 1999

Force

Number of samples received

Avon and Somerset15,854
Bedfordshire3,279
Cambridgeshire8,179
Cheshire8,789
Cleveland7,079
Cumbria5,382
Derbyshire17,842
Devon and Cornwall15,563
Dorset3,254
Durham9,195
Dyfed-Powys10,361
Essex14,986
Gloucestershire4,855
GMP21,360
Gwent9,657
Hampshire16,298
Hertfordshire5,264
Humberside27,289
Kent8,967
Lancashrie15,997
Leicestershire10,372
Lincolnshire5,252

Table B: Cumulative figures by police force—April 1995 to March 1999

Force

Number of samples received

Metropolitan96,88
City of London8,334
Mersey17,320
Norfolk15,432
Northampshire9,670
Northumbria17,660
North Wales9,446
North Yorks6,753
Nottinghamshire6,652
South Wales24,153
South Yorkshire25,392
Staffordshire14,731
Suffolk3,438
Surrey4,729
Sussex9,034
Thames Valley11,743
Warwickshire3,249
West Mercia8,788
West Midlands41,970
West Yorkshire35,241
Wiltshire4,662

Police Vehicles

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what research his Department has (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated on the need for and use of rapid response by police vehicles. [86200]

No research on this precise subject has been commissioned. The only recent research in this area of police work was conducted by the Home Office Police Research Group who published in 1997 the results of a study of deaths and serious injuries resulting from police vehicle accidents. It found that three police activities accounted for 88 per cent. of fatal accidents—45 per cent. were during pursuit/follow situations; 23 per cent. arose during responses to emergency calls and 20 per cent. were routine patrol cases. This research was used by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) in its recent report and recommendations on police pursuit training.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what were the average response times of police cars to emergency calls in the last year for which figures are available. [86201]

The information requested is not available centrally, but in 1997–98, in England and Wales, 88 per cent. of police immediate responses to incidents were within the targets set by forces.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what are the rules governing blue light police car responses. [86202]

This is an operational matter for chief officers of police. There is a nationally agreed Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) Pursuit Code of Practice and work is going forward to implement recommendations from the recent ACPO report on police pursuit driver training. One of the recommendations in the ACPO report is that all police vehicles that engage in pursuits and emergency response should be equipped with both sirens and emergency blue lights. Such equipment should be used in all but exceptional circumstances. It is already policy to consider continuously the consequences of a pursuit and whether to break it off.

National Identification Service

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the current applications process for police checks in the National Identification Service; and if he will make a statement. [86199]

The Metropolitan Police Service's Character Enquiries section, which is based in the National Identification Service, carries out pre-employment vetting checks in accordance with administrative arrangements agreed between the Home Office and the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). New arrangements for criminal record checks, which will address the limitations of the current system, were included in Part V of the Police Act 1997. The various checks provided for in the Act will be undertaken by the new Criminal Records Bureau which is in the process of being established.

Nottingham Prison

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his answer of 25 May 1999, Official Report, column 80, what factors underlay his decision to select Nottingham Prison for the location of accommodation for offenders previously convicted of offences against children; and what other prisons were considered. [85906]

[holding answer 8 June 1999]: A wide range of factors were taken into account when considering the suitability of Her Majesty's Prison Nottingham for housing offenders and ex-offenders, including the need to ensure easy access to high quality local services such as the regular presence of experienced Probation and Social Services staff and a police force which is able to respond quickly and effectively. Such services are most easily available in towns and cities.In considering which prison would be appropriate, options across the prison estate were taken into account.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has further to publicise the decision to accommodate offenders previously convicted of offences involving children in Nottingham Prison. [86103]

Consultation with the relevant local agencies and interested people continues. My right hon. and noble Friend Lord Williams will be meeting representatives from Nottingham on Monday 14 June 1999.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what consultations (a) he has carried out and (b) he proposes to carry out concerning his plan to accommodate offenders previously convicted of offences involving children in Nottingham Prison. [86104]

The responsibility for managing the risk that ex-offenders present lies with local agencies. The plans in respect of Nottingham prison have been discussed with local Members of Parliament and they will be kept informed of progress. My right hon. and noble Friend Lord Williams will be meeting representatives from Nottingham on Monday 14 June 1999.

Behaviour Orders

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what guidance he has issued to local authorities on what constitutes anti-social behaviour under the behaviour orders under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998; how he will monitor the (a) use and (b) effectiveness of (i) behaviour orders, (ii) curfews and (iii) parenting orders; and what action he will take to encourage the use of such orders by (1) the police and (2) local authorities. [85671]

We published comprehensive guidance on the use of anti-social behaviour orders earlier this year "Crime and Disorder Act 1998: Anti-Social Behaviour Orders—Guidance". This included guidance on the types of case in which such orders might be considered. A review of the use and effectiveness of anti-social behaviour orders is planned during the first two years of their availability.

The local child curfew scheme will help address the problems of unsupervised children who are out on the streets late at night, and who may be involved in anti-social behaviour.

We intend to carry out a monitoring exercise of the local child curfew scheme to assess how the practical arrangements work in those areas which decide to operate such a scheme. This will help identify good practice, particularly in the area of multi-agency working, which will be required for the enforcement arrangements.

The parenting order is the subject of an 18-month pilot scheme, which began on 30 September 1993. This involves monitoring and evaluating the use made of the order. The results of the pilot project will inform the process of national implementation and help to identify good practice which can be reflected in guidance and national standards.

The decision to apply for anti-social behaviour orders or local child curfew schemes is one which must be taken by the police or local authority as appropriate, but we shall continue to encourage their use whenever the

Applications received for asylum in the United Kingdom and decisions1, excluding dependents, by gender2 1991 to 1998

Year of application

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

Applications received

Total44,84024,60522,37032,83043,96529,64032,50046,015
Of which:
Male (percentage)8070676971717578
Female (percentage)2030333129292522

Decisions in year3,4

Recognised as a refugee and granted asylum

Year of decision

19911992199319941995199619971998
Total5051,1151,5908251,2952,2403,9855,345
Of which:
Male (percentage)7182807872687370
Female (percentage)2918202228322730

Not recognised as a refugee but granted exceptional leave

Total2,19015,32511,1253,6604,4105,0553,1153,910
Of Which:
Male(Percentage)8176715759606878
Female(Percentage)1924294341403222

Refused asylum and exceptional leave

Total3,38018,46510,69016,50021,30031,67028,94522,315
Of Which:
Male(Percentage)8484817576757376
Female(Percentage)1616192524252724

1 Numbers rounded to the nearest 5 and percentages to the nearest 1 per cent.

2Estimates based on records for which this information is held centrally.

3Decisions may not relate to applications made in the same period.

4Information is of initial determination decisions, excluding the outcome of appeals or other subsequent decisions.

Search And Detention Powers

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department under what powers officers at the frontier of the common travel area of the United Kingdom and Ireland are entitled to (a) question, (b) examine the

opportunity to do so arises. Parenting orders are available to the courts and do not depend upon any application being made by either the police or the local authority.

Cctv

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what representations he has received relating to the reliability of CCTV cameras in providing evidence in speeding cases. [86027]

We have received no representations on this subject. No Closed Circuit Television systems have been granted type approval for police to use in the enforcement of speed limits.

Asylum Seekers

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many people who were (a) recognised as refugees, (b) granted exceptional leave and (c) refused asylum, in each year from 1991, were (i) female and (ii) male; [86121](2) how many asylum applicants in each year from 1991 were

(a) female and (b) male. [86120]

(c) search the person of and (d) detain a citizen of the European Union or European Economic Area or their accompanying relatives. [86229]

European Economic Area (EEA) nationals are normally admitted to the United Kingdom on production of a valid passport or identity card as evidence of nationality and identity, in accordance with Article 3(1) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Order 1994 and subject to Article 15(1) of the Order. Under Article 3(3) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Order 1994, a family member of an EEA national who is not himself an EEA national may in addition be required to hold an EEA family permit issued abroad.Powers for immigration officers to question passengers arriving in the United Kingdom, whether they are citizens of the European Union, or European Economic Area, or their accompanying (third country) relatives, are contained in paragraph 2 of Schedule 2 to the Immigration Act 1971. Schedule 2 applies to the examination of European Economic Area (EEA) nationals in accordance with Article 20(2)(e) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Order 1994. Under paragraph 4(3) of Schedule 2 to the Immigration Act 1971, a person who is examined under paragraph 2 of Schedule 2 to the Immigration Act 1971 may be searched, and his belongings examined, and that person may be detained under paragraph 16 of Schedule 2 of the Immigration Act 1971.The operation of immigration controls in the Republic of Ireland is a matter for the Irish authorities.

Eu (Corruption)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when a draft of the Convention on the Fight Against Corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of member states of the European Union, (Cm 4266) published in April was first published; and what scrutiny of it is planned to be conducted in either House of Parliament.[86234]

The Council of the European Union adopted the Convention on the Fight against Corruption Involving Officials of the European Communities or Officials of Member States of the European Union on 26 May 1997. It was first published in the Official Journal of the European Communities on 25 June 1997.Prior to its adoption by the Council, the Convention had been considered in draft and cleared from scrutiny by the House of Lords European Communities Committee.The Government published the Convention on 16 April 1999 with an Explanatory Memorandum, as a Command Paper in the European Communities Series, and laid it for 21 sitting days in both Houses in accordance with the Ponsonby rule. Arrangements are under way for the United Kingdom to ratify the Convention by September. We expect to be among the first Member States to do so.

European Communities Financial Interests

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if he will list in respect of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities Financial Interests and subsequent protocols (i) the dates of promulgation and signature, (ii) the dates of draft and final publication in the United Kingdom, (iii) any relevant parliamentary proceedings and (iv) the dates of coming into force; [85679]

(2) what plans he has to amend the criminal law and procedures in respect of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities' Financial Interests relating to international criminal fraud, and its protocols. [85680]

The Council of the European Union adopted and signed the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities' Financial Interests (the Fraud Convention) on 26 July 1995. The three protocols were adopted and signed on 27 September 1996, 29 November 1996 and 19 June 1997.The Government published the Convention and its protocols on 16 May 1999 as Command Papers in the European Communities Series, and laid them for 21 sitting days in both Houses in accordance with the Ponsonby rule.Prior to adoption the Convention and its protocols had been submitted for, and cleared from, parliamentary scrutiny.The Convention will enter into force 90 days after the Secretary-General of the Council receives notice that it has been ratified by the last Member State of the European Union. The same rule applies to each of the protocols, except that they cannot enter into force before the Convention.Following the recent commencement of Part I of the Criminal Justice Act 1993, which was brought into force on 1 June 1999, and of equivalent provisions of the Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 1996, which were brought into force on the same date, no further changes to criminal law are needed in the United Kingdom in order to satisfy the requirements of the Convention and protocols. Arrangements are under way for the United Kingdom to ratify the Convention and protocols by September.

Witness Protection (Eltham)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many officers are currently deployed on witness protection duties in the Eltham Police Division. [86194]

This is an operational matter for the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis. He tells me that in his view the information requested should not be published, in order to help maintain operational effectiveness.

Education And Employment

"Youth And Europe—Our Future"

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if he will place a copy of the European Presidency memorandum, Youth and Europe—Our Future, in the Library. [86365]

Copies of the German EU Presidency's memorandum have been placed in the Library.

Sure Start

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what progress he is making with the Sure Start programme; when (a) the application for the second round of Sure Start bids will be announced and (b) the application brochures will be sent to local authorities; who can bid for Sure Start funding; and when the closing date is for the next round. [85670]

Guidance inviting 60 areas of the country to apply for funding was published on 19 January. It was sent to key players across the country including local authorities. On 9 April, the Government announced the first 21 of these Sure Start programmes to be given funding. A further announcement concerning the others will be made soon.The Government hope to announce the next round of applications in the autumn when Guidance will be sent to local authorities and other providers of services for young children.

Funding

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if he will list, and place in the Library in machine-readable form, for (a) 1997–98, (b) 1998–99 and (c) 1999–2000 the revenue grants falling within the aggregate external finance, other than revenue support grant, allocated by his Department to (i) each local authority, (ii) in aggregate, to each class of local authority and (iii) in aggregate to England; and in the case of each local authority the total of such grants. [85757]

Details of the revenue grants within aggregate external finance other than revenue support grant for 1997–98, 1998–99 and 1999–2000, for each local education authority, each class of local authority and for England as a whole are given in tables that have been placed in the Library in both paper and machine-readable form. For Grants for Education Support and Training in 1997–98 and the Standards Fund in 1998–99 and 1999–2000 the figures shown in the tables include the grant made by the Department and the contribution made by the local education authority.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if he will list, and place in the Library in machine-readable form, for (a) 1997–98, (b) 1998–99 and (c) 1999–2000 the support for capital expenditure allocated by his Department (i) to each local authority, (ii) in aggregate to each class of local authority and (iii) in aggregate to England, showing each capital grant and borrowing approval separately, and the total of that support. [85758]

The information requested is shown in three tables, copies of which have been placed in the Library in both paper and machine-readable form.

Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment when he intends to reply to the letter dated 22 April from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mr. W. Jackson, 32 Westbourne Range. [86410]

Class Sizes

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what progress has been made in reducing the size of infant classes in South Gloucestershire. [86983]

During the debate on primary schools on 19 May 1999, Official Report, column 1035, I gave the hon. Member for Northavon (Mr. Webb) figures relating to infant class size reductions in South Gloucestershire. The correct figures show that the number of pupils in infant classes of over 30 fell from 3,391 in January 1998 to 1,387 in September 1998. The projected number of children in infant classes of over 30 for September 1999 is 326.

Business Links

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what was the total value of grants from TECs to Business Links in each of the last three financial years. [86667]

The following table provides the total expenditure by TEC/CCTEs on Enterprise and Business support activities which includes, but is not solely, expenditure on Business Links.

£ millionFinancial yearExpenditure
1995–9681
1996–97111
1997–98142
1998–99Not yet available

Employee Training (Government Grants)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if he will list the Government funds allocated to private sector companies for the provision of training for employees in the form of (a) capital grants and (b) infrastructure grants in each of the last three years; and if he will make a statement. [78303]

I have been asked to reply.The Government do not fund private sector companies for training employees through capital grants. The Government do support private sector companies through infrastructure grants, including the SRB, but it would involve a disproportionate cost to identify the amount of funds from this source used for training employees.