Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 344: debated on Thursday 10 February 2000

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Thursday 10 February 2000

Environment, Transport And The Regions

Common Land

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what plans he has for reviewing the legislation affecting common land and town and village greens. [110027]

I have today published a consultation paper on common land—"Greater Protection and Better Management of Common Land in England and Wales". The paper looks at three key areas: issues concerning the registration of common land and village greens; the consent regime for fencing and other works; and wider management issues. Copies have been placed in the Library of the House. I have invited comments on the paper by 10 April.

Greater London Authority

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what will be the cost of the new building for the Greater London Authority; and if the rent will be at the market rate for similar buildings. [110064]

We have reached agreement with the developer, CIT Group, on a rent of £36.50 per square foot, £393 per square metre. This is frozen until 2007. The fixed rent at practical completion of the contract will be £4.75 million per annum. There are no similar buildings in the area; however, the £36.50 compares favourably with current rents, for top quality space in prime locations, of typically around £50 per square foot in the City and the West End of London. The developer will meet the cost of the base building which is estimated at around £40 million.

Traffic Congestion

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what studies his Department has (a) undertaken and (b) commissioned which quantify the cost to the economy of traffic congestion. [108329]

My Department has not commissioned estimates of the costs of congestion from external sources. A number of external estimates have been made of the value road users might place on the elimination of congestion from the road network. The CBI have put this figure at £15 billion. Some estimates are lower, but agree that the figure runs into billions every year and is rising.The Department has made estimates of the amount of time lost on English roads as a result of congestion in 1996 and produced forecasts for 2010 under a number of illustrative scenarios. The results of this work are set out in our report "Tackling Congestion and Pollution", published last month. We will be doing more work in this area as part of our follow up to that report.Neither the external estimates, nor those undertaken by my Department, can be translated directly into assessments of the cost of congestion to the economy. This is because they relate only to the benefits road users might derive from reduced delays and take no account of the costs of achieving these reductions. The true costs of road congestion to the economy are the net benefits we forgo if we fail to tackle it.

Water Companies

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions who determines the areas in respect of which bids can be made by water supply companies based outside the area served by an existing company; and, in the event of a successful bid, which company retains (a) ownership of water pipes and (b) responsibility for their maintenance. [108741]

A company can be appointed as a water undertaker or sewerage undertaker by the Director General of Water Services under the Water Industry Act 1991. There is no restriction on the areas in respect of which appointments may be sought within England and Wales. A water company may seek to become the supplier for any area within that of another company by means of an 'inset' appointment: where that company consents to the appointment; where the appointment is in respect of parts of that area where none of the premises is served by that company; or where it is in respect of an area occupied by premises, each of which is supplied with, or likely to be supplied with, not less than 250 megalitres of water in any year. Ownership of water pipes and responsibility for their maintenance rests with the company holding the appointment for the area in question.The Competition Act 1998 comes into effect on 1 March, providing potential opportunities for greater competition. The Office of Fair Trading and Office of Water Services have issued guidance on the application of the 1998 Act to the water and sewerage sectors. If shared use of a water undertaker's network is agreed, ownership and responsibility for maintenance would remain with the undertaker, but with arrangements for sharing the costs between the two companies

Air Pollution

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what plans he has to encourage industrial users of (a) kerosene and (b) gas oil to switch to cleaner fuels. [108712]

Under the Marketing of Gas Oil regulations 1994, the sulphur content of gas oil marketed in the UK is limited to 0.2 per cent. The Sulphur Content of Certain Liquid Fuels Directive (1999/32/EC), due to be transposed into member states legislation on 1 July 2000, will prohibit the use of gas oil with a sulphur content higher than 0.2 per cent. from 1 July 2000 and 0.1 per cent. from 1 January 2008.The combustion of kerosene and gas oil in industrial processes above 20 Megawatts thermal input is regulated under the Environmental Protection Act 1990. Over the past decade the Environment Agency has encouraged operators of the processes they regulate under the Act to switch to less polluting fuels, initially from heavy fuel oil to gas oil, and then (over the last few years) to gas. For example, most gas turbines now use gas as their main fuel with gas oil or kerosene only as a backup in case of an interruption to the gas supply. The Environment Agency will continue to encourage these changes to cleaner fuels.

Light Rapid Transit Systems

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what plans he has to fund further tram or light railway systems; and if he will make a statement. [108725]

Central Government support is available to local authorities to fund light rapid transit systems in the form of grant under section 56 of the Transport Act 1968. Revenue support is provided through the local government finance system to meet the cost of borrowing undertaken by authorities to finance capital expenditure on major transport schemes and for eligible expenditure on local authority Private Finance Initiative projects.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what research his Department has undertaken into the benefits of tram/light railway systems (a) in the UK and (b) in other European Union countries; and if he will make a statement. [108726]

My Department has contributed to studies on the impact of Manchester Metrolink, South Yorkshire Supertram and Croydon Tramlink. Reports on Manchester Metrolink and South Yorkshire Supertram have now been completed. The Department has also funded a report into light rail and complementary measures, which covers European systems. This was published in May 1998. A follow-up study is being undertaken. Copies of the completed reports have been placed in the Library.

Debt Payment

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what data he collects from local authorities on the proportions of invoices paid by them within the agreed contract time. [109049]

Under the provisions of the Local Government Act 1999, authorities will be required to report annually their performance against specified national performance indicators. An indicator is included in respect of the percentage of undisputed invoices paid within 30 days, or mutually agreed terms. The Secretary of State has set targets for such payment of invoices of 95 per cent. for 2000–01, 97.5 per cent. for 2001–02 and 100 per cent. for 2002–03.

Housing Transfers

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what resources are available to his Department to make one-off payments to cover overhanging debt following the transfer of local authority housing stock in (a) 1999–2000, (b) 2000–01 and (c) 2001–02. [109102]

There are proposals within the Spring Supplementary Estimates to allow for £25 million to assist with the repayment of overhanging debt in the current financial year. The sum required in future years will depend on Ministers' decisions in response to applications for a place on the housing transfer programme from local authorities with overhanging debt. The Government's contribution to extinguishing overhanging debt will be by taking on an agreed amount of a local authority's outstanding debt principal, rather than through the use of programme resources.

Social Housing

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what plans he has to review the rules regarding the location of the units of social housing which developers are required by local authorities to include within their developments, with particular reference to the scope for locating those units outside the local authority in question. [109023]

We have no plans to review planning policy on affordable housing. Draft PPG3: "Housing" reaffirms existing policy that local planning authorities may require an element of affordable housing to be provided in suitable residential developments where a local need exists.

Air Traffic Control

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what plans he has to develop the working relationship between National Air Traffic Services Ltd. and Military Air Traffic Control. [108526]

[holding answer 8 February 2000]: National Air Traffic Services (NATS) and the Ministry of Defence (MOD) already enjoy a good working relationship and provide a joint and integrated air traffic control service. These working arrangements are being formalised in order to facilitate the public private partnership for NATS. Copies of the heads of terms of what will be the contract between the MOD and NATS have been made available to members of the Standing Committee considering the Transport Bill. I have sent a copy of this document to my hon. Friend today.

Road Congestion

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what assessment he has made of the cost of road congestion to business. [108529]

[holding answer 8 February 2000]: A number of external estimates have been made of the value road users might place on the elimination of congestion from the on road network. The CBI have put this figure at £15 billion, some estimates are lower, but agree that the figure runs into billions every year and is rising.The Department has made estimates of the amount of time lost on English roads as a result of congestion in 1996 and produced forecasts for 2010 under a number of illustrative scenarios. The results of this work are set out in our report "Tackling Congestion and Pollution", published last month. We will be doing more work in this area as part of our follow up to that report.

Neither the external estimates, nor those undertaken by my Department, can be translated directly into assessments of the cost of congestion to business or more widely. This is because they relate only to the benefits road users might derive from reduced delays and take no account of the costs of achieving these reductions. The true costs of road congestion are the net economic and other benefits we forgo if we fail to tackle it.

Telecommunications Masts

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what representations he has received concerning the Government's planning guidance issued to local authorities relating to mobile phone masts over the past three years; and if he will make a statement. [109288]

The Department has received a range of representations on planning guidance and procedures for telecommunications over the last three years. We issued proposals to improve the arrangements in "Telecommunications Development Control" published in July 1998. This attracted 269 responses. Changes were implemented, by way of amendments to the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995, in July 1999 and explained in Circular 4/99. We also issued for consultation in December 1998 the draft of a joint DETR/DH circular on "Land Use Planning and Electromagnetic Fields". This received 147 responses. The circular will be finalised as soon as practicable after the Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones has reported in the spring.

Departmental Contracts

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what is the (a) number and (b) value of contracts let by his Department since May 1997 to external consultants and advisers for the management of competitive tendering processes. [109302]

The information requested cannot be provided on the ground of disproportionate cost, as it is not held centrally.My Department would normally engage external consultants and advisers to manage competitive tendering processes only where particular expertise or knowledge is required which is not available in-house.

Minister For Transport

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what registerable share holdings under the rules laid down for Ministers are held by the Minister for Transport; what board directorships he resigned on his first appointment as a Minister; and what matters pertaining to his Department's work the Minister does not handle in order to avoid potential conflicts of interest. [109386]

The arrangements put in place by my right hon. and noble Friend the Minister for Transport for handling his financial interests on his first appointment as a Minister were made clear in a Press Notice issued by the Scottish Office on 3 August 1998. A copy was placed in the Library of the House. Investments which were not disposed of were placed in a blind trust with an instruction to the solicitors administering the trust that the trust should not deal in shares which relate to my right hon. and noble Friend's ministerial portfolio. In line with the requirements of the Ministerial Code, my right hon. and noble Friend is not informed of changes in investments or the state of the portfolio. Consequently, my right hon. and noble Friend does not have any potential conflicts of interests.

Local Government (Payment Culture)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what steps he has taken to improve the payment culture in local government; and if he will make a statement. [109832]

Under the provisions of the Local Government Act 1999, authorities will be required to report annually their performance against specified national performance indicators. An indicator is included in respect of the percentage of undisputed invoices paid within 30 days, or mutually agreed terms. The Secretary of State has set targets for such payment of invoices of 95 per cent. for 2000–01, 97.5 per cent. for 2001–02 and 100 per cent. for 2002–03.

Grants

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions if he will list the initiatives launched by his Department since May 1997 under which specific grants are allocated, indicating in each case and for each financial year the funding provided by central Government. [109310]

The information requested is given in the table.

£ million
Initiative1997–981998–991999– 2000
New Deal for Communities012.548.5
Rough Sleepers—London0018.4
Rough Sleepers—Outside London0013.2
Coalfields Regeneration Trust0117.710.0
Coalfields Fund005.0
Grants to Audit Commission for Best Value Inspections005.0
Rural Bus Subsidy Grant032.532.5
Rural Bus Challenge05.015.0
Rural Transport Partnership04.24.2
Rail Passenger Partnership/ Infrastructure Investment Fund0020.0
1 Includes Coalfields Fund allocation for 1998–99

Countryside Traffic Measures Group

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions on what dates the Countryside Traffic Measures Group has met; what matters have been discussed; what conclusions have been reached; and if he will make a statement. [109382]

The Countryside Traffic Measures Group has met formally on four occasions: 10 July 1997, 4 November 1997, 13 March 1998, and 3 November 1998, and at other times informally or to discuss individual schemes. The inaugural meeting agreed the main objective, which is to develop good practice guidance on rural traffic management designed with sensitivity to the countryside environment. Meetings subsequently have discussed and agreed the schemes to be included in the monitoring project and, latterly, progress of the schemes. Monitoring of the schemes is due to be completed in March 2001. Until then it would be premature to draw conclusions on the measures installed. My Department will continue to help the Countryside Agency and local authorities develop these measures.

Eurostar

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what obligation is placed on Eurostar (UK) to offer reduced rail fares to senior citizens; and what plans he has to change this. [109381]

Eurostar (UK) Ltd. is not obliged to offer rail fares at reduced rates to senior citizens and there are no plans to introduce such an obligation.

Road Noise Reduction

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what road noise reduction surfaces his Department has recently approved for use. [109378]

I have asked the Chief Executive of the Highways Agency, Mr. Peter Nutt, to write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Jon Seddon to Mr. Mark Oaten, dated 10 February 2000:

The Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions has asked me to respond to your question about what road noise reduction surfaces his Department has recently approved for use. In the absence of the Chief Executive I am responding to the question.
In addition to porous asphalt and exposed aggregate concrete which are included in the specification for trunk road construction, to date the Highways Agency has approved, for use on trunk roads in England, fifteen proprietary surfacing products which have been shown to generate significantly lower noise levels than conventional surfaces. Six of these products were approved in the past year. They are already being widely used for surfacing roads that need maintenance.
For the future, a new scheme for approving a range of innovative products has been set up with other highway authorities under which the British Board of Agreement will certify that products meet the specified performance requirements.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions if he will treat applications in respect of properties on existing roads for double glazing as a method of noise reduction for residents in the same way as such applications in respect of properties on new roads. [109379]

The Noise Insulation Regulations apply to properties affected by existing roads which have been physically altered as well as to new roads. I have no plans to extend the scope of these Regulations to properties affected by unaltered roads.

Genetically Modified Crops

To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions if he will make a statement on the current progress of genetically modified crop trials in the United Kingdom. [107886]

The farm scale evaluation programme is now starting its second year. The studies are designed to evaluate the impact on farmland wildlife of the management of herbicide tolerant GM crops, with their associated herbicide, as compared with equivalent non-GM crops managed conventionally. The ecological studies are being funded by the UK Government and carried out by independent contractors on fields of GM and conventional crops provided by the industry body SCIMAC. The studies are being overseen by an independent Scientific Steering Committee reporting to the Secretary of State.The first year of the farm scale evaluations included plantings of oil seed rape and fodder maize in the spring, followed in the autumn by winter oil seed rape. The Scientific Steering Committee reported at the end of the first year that the methodology of the farm scale evaluations was scientifically robust, and gave a firm base from which to proceed to full-scale trials this year. A further announcement about this year's sites will be made shortly.In November 1999, a renewed agreement between Government and the industry body SCIMAC on the conduct of the farm scale evaluations was reached, to cover the three years through to harvest of crops planted in 2002, including agreement that no general unrestricted cultivation of GM crops will take place in the UK until the farm-scale evaluations are complete. Under the renewed agreement, the farm scale evaluations are likely to be extended in scope this year to cover a further crop, GM beet, dependent on the advice of the Scientific Steering Committee on the scope and validity under UK conditions of similar trials being carried out in Denmark.The fields grown for this year's trials will also be used to monitor the gene flow between the GM and non-GM crops to determine the depth of cross pollination.

Culture, Media And Sport

New Millennium Experience Company

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what estimate he has made of the wind-up costs of the millennium experience. [108772]

[holding answer 7 February 2000]: The actual financial costs of winding up the New Millennium Experience Company would depend on the commitments and liabilities outstanding at the time when any such decision were taken. Neither the Government, nor the Millennium Commission, nor the Board of NMEC have plans to wind up the New Millennium Experience Company prior to the completion of its remit to run the Millennium Experience to 31 December 2000.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if loans made to the New Millennium Experience Company by the Millennium Commission may be subordinated. [106442]

[holding answer 24 January 2000]: The Millennium Commission has not made any loans to the New Millennium Experience Company (NMEC) or any other organisation. The Commission cannot make loans as it has no statutory powers to do so.

All grant made to NMEC is repayable if any surplus is achieved from its operations or asset disposals after the organisation has met its other contractual liabilities. However, this grant does not constitute a loan as there is no guarantee of repayment or certainty of the amount which might be repaid to the Commission. It is open to the Commission to impose, as a condition of grant, the terms on which it will be repaid.

Millennium Dome

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if he will list the foods sold in the Millennium Dome that (a) do and (b) do not meet standards required of food produced in the United Kingdom. [108957]

There are over 35 catering outlets in and around the Dome at Greenwich selling a wide range of food from snacks to cordon bleu. All are required to meet the same statutory requirements as apply to commercial catering and food outlets in the UK.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what is the target number of visitors to the Millennium Dome for 2000. [108963]

The New Millennium Experience Company's target is 12 million. Visitor numbers in the first month, at just over 366,400 represent just under 4 per cent. of the target. This mirrors the visitor attraction industry norm for January.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what is the daily capacity of the Millennium Dome. [108962]

The licensed capacity of the Dome site, at any one time during the day, is 35,000 plus 2,000 staff.

Millennium River Of Fire

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what (a) public and (b) Lottery funds were used in connection with the Millennium River of Fire; and if he will make a statement. [105904]

The "Big Time" event on New Year's Eve in central London incorporated a wide range of activities and entertainment throughout the day attended and watched, safely, by about 3 million people. The River of Fire was one part of a spectacular firework display which itself was one part of Big Time. The 17 minute display was enjoyed by people along the Thames embankment and from other vantage points, as well as by a world-wide television audience. No public or lottery funds were involved in paying for the pyrotechnics. The New Millennium Experience Company, who were asked by the Government, the Millennium Commission and other public agencies and organisations involved in the event to co-ordinate and manage it, have, in the absence of major commercial sponsorship for the London-wide event to complement Millennium Commission's grant under their Millennium Festival programme, underwritten these costs.

Lord Chancellor's Department

Computers

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department, pursuant to his answer of 31 January 2000, Official Report, column 472W, on computers, if any of the hackers accessed computer files containing (a) the personal details of jurors or witnesses and (b) details of the jury selection procedures. [109388]

There has only been one recorded instance, in 1995, when a member of staff was found to have possible unauthorised access to juror details. The person, a casual employee, had discovered a supervisor's password and had altered system access permissions. Subsequent investigation found no evidence of tampering with data. The staff member was dismissed.

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department, pursuant to his answer of 31 January 2000, Official Report, column 472W, on computers, what action has been taken to prevent internal hacking incidents on Court Service computers, particularly files containing (a) the personal details of jurors or witnesses and (b) details of the jury selection procedures. [109387]

The Court Service carries out security risk analyses on all its major computer systems to ensure they comply with the security guidelines laid down in HMG's Manual of Protective Security. The countermeasures implemented include unique user names, secure passwords and access to systems and areas of systems on a 'need-to-know' basis. Passwords are changed regularly. All staff are provided with guidance on how to maintain system security. Some juror details are held on systems which are owned and managed by the Department's PFI partners. Security measures have been conveyed to them and are contractual.

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department, pursuant to his answer of 31 January 2000, Official Report, column 472W, on computers, what type of information was accessed by the hackers from computers in the Court Service; and what action was taken (a) to identify the hackers and (b) to discipline Court Service staff involved in the incidents. [109389]

The type of information potentially available to an internal 'hacker' varies according to the system accessed. Approximately half of the incidents involved stand-alone PCs or networked PCs used in the Headquarters of the Lord Chancellor's Department for administrative purposes; the remainder involved operational systems, such as those used for case management. Most incidents involved misuse of another member of staffs user name and password. The information potentially at risk was either a person's own work in progress, or in a few instances, details of cases. All incidents were investigated and remedial action applied. No evidence of compromise of Protectively Marked (or classified) information nor of a breach of the Data Protection Acts was found.The staff responsible were identified in half of the incidents and all received verbal warnings, except for one who received a written warning and one who was dismissed.

Northern Ireland

Mrs Rosemary Nelson

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland for what reason the police did not contact the Committee on the Administration of Justice seeking originals of threats for forensic examination until some days after Mrs. Rosemary Nelson was killed [103821]

[holding answer 19 January 2000]: The investigation into the murder of Mrs. Nelson is being directed by Mr. Colin Port, the Deputy Chief Constable of Norfolk. While his investigation is in progress it is not appropriate to comment in detail on it. I understand from the Chief Constable that once the original threatening note to Mrs. Nelson was obtained it was immediately forwarded for independent forensic examination. That examination has not produced results which have, at this point, assisted the investigation

Surveillance Operation, Monaghan

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what representations he has received from (a) the Irish Government and (b) Sinn Fein Assembly Members with regard to an alleged incident of RUC officers crossing the border to mount a surveillance operation in Monaghan. [107583]

We have received one request for information from the British Irish Intergovernmental Secretariat concerning an alleged border incursion by the RUC on 12 January. No representations have been received from Sinn Fein.

Police

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many officers currently serve in (a) the Special Branch and (b) the Criminal Investigation Department of the RUC. [107819]

At 1 February 2000, 684 officers were serving in the Special Branch and 809 in the Criminal Investigation Department of the Royal Ulster Constabulary.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what plans he has to make the Chief Constable of the RUC responsible for assessing the security situation; how often he will be required to make this assessment; and in what form his findings will be made public. [107808]

The Chief Constable has been and continues to be the Secretary of State's principal security adviser. The Chief Constable gives his assessment to the Secretary of State on a regular and confidential basis.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, pursuant to his answer of 20 December 1999, Official Report, column 410W, what communication he has received from bodies other than the US Congress about US-sponsored training and exchange programmes; and what response the RUC will make to fulfil conditions that will be imposed upon joint training and exchange programmes. [107822]

I have received no communication from other bodies about US sponsored training and exchange programmes. The Royal Ulster Constabulary will make every effort to fulfil any conditions that may be imposed upon US joint training and exchange. It is the RUC's policy that officers are selected solely on the eligibility criteria applicable to any proposed training/exchange programme. In keeping with the Royal Ulster Constabulary equal opportunities policy, officers are selected purely on merit.

Disqualifications Bill

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what (a) oral and (b) written representations he has received from members of the House of Commons and the Northern Ireland Assembly on the subject of the Disqualifications Bill, indicating in each case the date on which representations were received; and if he will place all written representations in the Library. [107638]

[holding answer 31 January 2000]: Disqualification issues have been discussed with the Irish Government, the UUP, Sinn Fein and the SDLP. I have a large number of contacts with these and other parties at which disqualification and numerous other issues arise and I am unable to supply an exhaustive list of such.On 20 December, prior to the introduction of the Disqualification Bill, I wrote to the Northern Ireland parties represented in the Commons and the Home Secretary wrote to the leaders of the Conservative and Liberal parties, notifying them of the Government's intentions with regard to the Disqualification Bill. No response, written or oral, has yet been received.The only written representation I have received on the subject is a letter, dated 14 December 1999, from the right hon. Member for Upper Bann (Mr. Trimble). As a result of this and subsequent discussions the Bill was amended.It is a matter for the right hon. Member for Upper Bann whether he wishes to publish this letter in the House Library.

Departmental Expenditure Limit

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what proposals there are to amend the Northern Ireland Office Departmental Expenditure Limit and running costs limit for 1999–2000. [109974]

As the result of Devolution of the Departmental Expenditure Limit (DEL) for Northern Ireland shown in table 3.1 of Public Expenditure Statistical Analysis 1999–2000 has been split into two, one for the Northern Ireland Office £995,487,000 and the second for Northern Ireland Departments £4,856,247,000.Subject to parliamentary approval of the necessary Supplementary Estimate for Class XV, Vote 1 the Northern Ireland Office Departmental Expenditure Limit for 1999–2000 will be increased by £29,790,000 from £995,487,000 to £1,025,277,000. The running costs limit will be increased by £7,783,000 from £193,523,000 to £201,306,000. The increase is the net effect of take-up of end year flexibility of £15,545,000 and an additional £5,868,000 for the Bloody Sunday Inquiry. Other changes to the DEL include £8,144,000 from Northern Ireland Departments and £233,000 from the Home Office.The increase will be offset by a charge on the DEL Reserve and will not therefore add to the planned total of public expenditure.

Trade And Industry

Bnfl

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will place in the Library copies of the material supplied by BNFL to members of the Fukui Regional Assembly regarding the problems with their MOX fuel. [106714]

[holding answer 3 February 2000]: I understand that BNFL did not pass any information to the Fukui Regional Assembly.

Export Licences

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1) how many licences to export goods to Iran have been (a) granted and (b) refused, in the last 12 months; [108474](2) how many applications for licences to export goods to Iran have been rejected in the past 12 months on the grounds that there was an unacceptable risk that the goods might be diverted to a weapons of mass destruction programme. [108475]

The entry in the relevant legislation under which the export of goods is controlled is known as their rating. The Export Control Organisation's computer databases have been interrogated. Between 1 January 1999 and 28 January 2000, 91 Standard Individual Export Licences (SIELs) and one Open Individual Export Licence (OIEL) were issued covering the export to consignees or end-users in Iran. During the period 18 applications for a SIEL and no applications for an OIEL were refused. Individual applications and licences may cover a range of goods with various ratings (and OIELs may also cover a range of countries). Where this is so, the licence is included in the table in the total for all of the relevant ratings.

Standard Individual Export Licences issued and applications refused

for such licences between 1 January 1999 and 28 January 2000

covering the export to Iran of goods entered in Part III of

Schedule 1 to the Export of Goods (Control) Order 1994,

commonly known as the Military List
RatingNumber of SIELs issued covering goods with this ratingNumber of SIEL Number of SIELs applications refused covering goods with this rating
ML301
ML1310

Standard Individual Export Licences issued and applications refused
between 1 January 1999 and 28 January 2000 covering the export to
Iran of other goods

Rating

Number of SIELs issued covering goods with this rating

Number of SIEL applications refused covering goods with this rating

IC00810
IC11010
IC2291
IC35050
2B35010
3A00130
5A00220
5D00210
6A00110
6A00310
7A10320
8A99074
8D99002
9A990306
9A99101
9E99040
End-use367

The one OIEL issued covered goods with the rating 5A002.

The paper records for the 18 applications for a SIEL that were refused have been examined and seven were refused because of concern that the goods would be diverted to programmes relating to weapons of mass destruction. I am disclosing this information in accordance with the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information. This information should be considered in light of the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Kingswood (Mr. Berry) on 27 July 1999, Official Report, columns 307–08W.

Coal Mining

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry when he last discussed state aid for the UK deep coal mining industry with DG VII; and if he will make a statement. [109021]

Officials in the Department are in regular contact with the European Commission on issues concerning the coal industry and the European Coal and Steel Community State aid regime that applies to it.

Natural Gas

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what estimate he has made of the life span of British natural gas resources at the current rate of depletion, and taking into account the consents for gas-powered electricity generating stations which have been granted but not implemented. [109115]

[holding answer 8 February 2000]: Estimates of the United Kingdom's remaining recoverable reserves of gas are given in the Department of Trade and Industry's "Development of the Oil and Gas Resources of the United Kingdom 1999", a copy of which is in the Library of the House. This shows that discovered reserves could yield 1,795 billion cubic metres (bcm). This is equivalent to 18 years of production at current rates. If the full potential from as yet undrilled structures were to be realised, this could raise discovered reserves to 3,625 bcm. Estimates of reserves are, however, not constant over time and exploration may add to these estimates.Whether production from these reserves will fully meet UK demand for any future period depends on a number of variables such as the timing of commencement and cessation of production in particular fields. As the Government indicated in their Energy White Paper in October 1998 (Cm 4071), it is likely that some gas imports would be required by the end of this decade.

Metric And Imperial Measures

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what guidance he has given to enforcement officials in respect of sales of goods sold from loose stock by measured weight in metric and imperial units. [109442]

Local authorities have an independent statutory responsibility to enforce weights and measures legislation. As with the earlier stages of metrication, DTI has encouraged the local authorities to provide small traders with information and advice about the change to metric weights for the sale of loose goods, and to recognise the difficulties that some small traders have had in changing to metric weights by 31 December 1999.

Defence

Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when he will reply to the letter from the hon. Member for Falkirk, West, dated 17 December 1999, referring to an unanswered letter from the Trident Ploughshares campaign, dated 31 August 1999. [105908]

Punishment Warrants

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what was the total number of summary trials resulting in punishment warrants in the Royal Navy in (a) 1995, (b) 1996, (c) 1997, (d) 1998 and (e) 1999. [107869]

[holding answer 1 February 2000]: The information requested is as follows:

YearNumber
1995284
1996220
1997218
1998196
19991128
1Reported to date

Land Mine Clearance

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what recent research his Department has (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated on the effectiveness of methods currently in use for anti-personnel land mines clearance. [108633]

My Department has not conducted any recent research specifically on the effectiveness of methods currently in use for anti-personnel land mine clearance. However, we have carried out limited trials on commercially produced hand held metal detectors.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what recent representations he has received concerning the Dervish anti-personnel land mines clearance project. [108632]

Since 1997, my Department has received a number of representations concerning the Dervish anti-personnel land mines clearance project and the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA) has been in correspondence with the head of the project team. The Dervish device is intended for area clearance of anti-personnel mines and while it may have a role in humanitarian mine clearance, the system does not currently meet the requirements of the Armed Services.

Project Horizon

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the impact of the UK's decision to pull out of Project Horizon on the future integration of European defence (a) policies and (b) industries. [109036]

In April 1999, the participating nations—UK, France and Italy—decided not to proceed with the tri-national Horizon programme upon completion of its Project Definition phase in October 1999. We are, however, continuing to develop collaboratively the Principal Anti-Air Missile System.The continuing commitment of European nations to strengthen their military capabilities, and to develop the means for undertaking crisis management, was demonstrated in the conclusions of both the European Council and North Atlantic Council meetings of Defence and Foreign Ministers in December 1999.The Government remain committed to facilitating European defence industrial restructuring. We have negotiated a Framework Agreement with European partner nations designed to remove unnecessary obstacles to defence restructuring and hope to sign this Agreement shortly.

President Of The Council

European Charter On Human Rights

To ask the President of the Council if, pursuant to her answer of 8 December 1999, Official Report, column 532W, concerning the proposed European Charter of Human Rights, she will list the meetings which the hon. Members for Bridgend (Mr. Griffiths) and for Eastleigh (Mr. Chidgey) and the Baroness Howells have (a) attended or (b) plan to attend; and if a Minister will report to the House on progress in the work of the drafting body prior to its submission to the European Council. [108754]

I have been asked to reply.There have been two meetings of the Charter of Rights Convention: on 17 December 1999 and 1-2 February 2000. The two parliamentary delegates were present at both. The next Convention session is an informal meeting on 24–25 February. The individual delegates and alternates are best placed to say which future meetings they plan to attend.The House will have several opportunities to discuss the Charter, for example in the six-monthly debate before the June 2000 European Council.

Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs

Ukraine

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the approximate expenditure to date of the European Union in respect of the Partnership Agreement with the Ukraine; how much is budgeted for 2000; what (a) proposals and (b) reports concerning such expenditure have been compiled; and whether each of these has been made public. [105083]

There is a wide range of Community and bilateral programmes which support the EU/Ukraine Partnership and Co-operation Agreement. The main Community programme is TACIS, from which over 600 million euro was committed between 1991–98. The TACIS 2000 budget for Ukraine has not yet been decided. Since 1991, Ukraine has also benefited from EU grants towards the closure of Chernobyl (210 million euro), EU macro-financial loans (565 million euro) and humanitarian aid (12 million euro). In addition EU member states have provided bilaterally some 2.5 billion euro in loans and grants between 1991 and 1997. The European Commission's proposals for TACIS spending appear in its Country Strategy Papers, which are not made public. Reports of TACIS expenditure are, however, published annually. An independent evaluation of TACIS in Ukraine was published in 1998.

Middle East

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the latest developments in the middle east peace process. [109053]

We are greatly concerned by the recent escalation of violence in Lebanon and the suspension of Permanent Status Talks between the Israelis and Palestinians.We urge all parties in Lebanon to exercise restraint and to respect the April 1996 Understandings. These incidents confirm the pressing need for renewed efforts to achieve a comprehensive negotiated peace in the region, including implementation of UNSCR 425.We have high-level contact with all the parties to the peace process and offer what help we can in the search for agreement.

Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affarirs what plans he has to attend the 2000 Review Conference of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. [109175]

I represent my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs at the NPT Review Conference and deliver the UK address to the plenary session. I would welcome any thoughts my hon. Friend might have on the matter.

Indonesia

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the Government's policy in relation to the sectarian conflict in Maluku; what discussions he has had with the Indonesian President on this issue; and if he will make a statement. [109109]

My right hon. Friends the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary and I discussed the sectarian conflict in Maluku with President Wahid and his Foreign Minister when they were in London on 1 February. We expressed our concerns to President Wahid about the violence and loss of life. President Wahid reaffirmed his commitment to secure lasting peace between the two communities. We shall support him vigorously in his efforts and stand ready to help him in any way possible.

Nato

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will deposit in the Library a copy of the Wilton Park Conference report on NATO's role in maintaining European security. [109051]

This report has now been placed in the Libraries of the House. All reports of Wilton Park Conferences are publicly available, including on the Wilton Park website (www.wiltonpark.org.uk.).

Departmental Contracts

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list for the financial year 1998–99 (a) the number and (b) the total value of contracts let by his Department with external consultants and advisers that (i) were put out to competitive tender, (ii) were not put out to competitive tender and (iii) were let on a non-commercial basis, stating in each case the names of the individuals or organisations that have carried out the work. [109263]

[holding answer 9 February 2000]: The information could be provided only at disproportionate cost. FCO procurement policy requires goods and services to be acquired by competitive tender unless there are compelling reasons to the contrary or they are below £500 in value. Sole source and single source procurement is subject to special safeguards.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the number and value of contracts let by his Department since May 1997 to external consultants and advisers for the management of competitive tendering processes. [109449]

Hong Kong

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he will publish the next report to Parliament on Hong Kong and the Sino-British Joint Declaration. [109973]

The sixth report in this series, covering the period July-December 1999, was published today and copies have been placed in the Libraries of the House. A copy of the report is also available on the Foreign and Commonwealth Office website (www.fco.gov.uk). The report includes a foreword by my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary. I commend the report to the House.

Gibraltar

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what arrangements will be made in the interval between the departure of the Governor of Gibraltar and his successor taking up his appointment; and if he will make a statement. [109505]

During the interval between the departure of the present Governor of Gibraltar and the arrival of his successor, the Deputy Governor will be Acting Governor.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs for what reason there has been a delay in announcing the appointment of the new Governor of Gibraltar; and when he expects the announcement to be made. [109506]

There has been no delay. The announcement of the appointment of the next Governor of Gibraltar will be made in the near future.

Solicitor-General

Crown Prosecution Service

30.

To ask the Solicitor-General if he will make a statement on the background of the Crown Prosecution Service inspectorate. [107913]

The CPS Inspectorate was established in 1997 to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the CPS. The Glidewell report recommended that the Inspectorate should be retained and that its role should be expanded. There were also recommendations for introducing a more substantial lay element. These recommendations have been accepted, but the Government have gone further and wishes to place the Inspectorate on an independent statutory basis. This House will shortly be asked to consider the CPS Inspectorate Bill.

To ask the Solicitor-General what proportion of the files referred to the Crown Prosecution Service by the Police do not lead to prosecution in (a) England and Wales and (b) West Yorkshire. [109054]

The Crown Prosecution Service records case outcomes in terms of the number of defendants whose case was handled by the Service, rather than in terms of the number of files dealt with. During the year ending December 1999, a prosecution did not proceed in respect of 250,738 defendants in England and Wales, representing 18.4 per cent. of completed cases. In CPS West Yorkshire, a prosecution did not proceed in respect of 15,635 defendants, representing 18.5 per cent. of completed cases.

Young Offenders

31.

To ask the Solicitor-General what assessment he has made of the Crown Prosecution Service's performance in Merseyside on speeding up the process towards the trial of young offenders. [107915]

When I visited CPS Merseyside in September last year, I observed at first hand the efforts made by the CPS and other local agencies to reduce the time it took to prosecute persistent young offenders. The Area, in conjunction with other criminal justice agencies in Merseyside, is implementing practices that should make further significant reductions for all young offenders.

Financial Crime

To ask the Solicitor-General what recent discussions he has had with the Financial Services Authority about tackling serious financial crime. [107912]

As my hon. Friend is aware, the Law Officers do not have statutory Ministerial responsibility for the Financial Services Authority. I have visited the Financial Services Authority, although not in the recent past, and was given a general introduction to their work, including enforcement work. The Financial Services Authority share responsibility for tackling serious financial crime with the police, Department of Trade and Industry, Serious Fraud Office, DPP in Northern Ireland and the Crown Office in Scotland. Officials are developing guidelines on the co-ordination of the work of these bodies in relation to suspected financial crime. It is proposed to publish these guidelines when they have been agreed.

Education And Employment

Further Education Colleges

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what assessment he has made of the potential conflict of interest in the practice of further education colleges (a) employing and (b) receiving on secondment, staff from companies engaged as the college's auditors; and if he will discuss this matter with the Further Education Funding Council prior to issuing guidance on practice. [107972]

It is for individual colleges to determine whether to use auditors for other services. Audit arrangements in FE have been strengthened by the requirement that auditors cannot be responsible both for internal and external audits. The Further Education Funding Council for England require all colleges to disclose in their accounts remuneration to auditors for their services.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment how many further education colleges have employed external consultants to advise on unit farming; and if he will make a statement. [107973]

This information is not held centrally. But in designing the new funding systems that will be employed by the Learning and Skills Council, subject to the passage of legislation, we intend that arrangements should be simpler to understand, administer and audit than current arrangements.

New Deal

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if he will provide a breakdown of the total expenditure on each of the new deal schemes. [109279]

I have been asked to reply.The allocation of the Windfall Tax receipts between the New Deal programmes, as currently estimated, is set out in Table 4.1 of the 1999 Pre Budget Report.

Home Department

Firearms

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many firearms have been misappropriated over the last five years from (a) the police, (b) the Ministry of Defence police, (c) the Atomic Energy Authority police and (d) the armed forces. [108825]

Information on the misappropriation of firearms from the police service is not collected centrally, but inquiries of 41 police forces in

Table 1: Total asylum applications received by European Union countries from 1990 to 1999
Countries1990199119921993199419951996199719981999Grand total
Germany2,3193,100256,100438,200322,600127,200127,900116,400104,40098,60095,3001,879,800
United Kingdom326,20044,80024,60022,40032,80044,00029,60032,50046,00071,200374,100
Netherlands21,20021,60020,40035,40052,60029,30022,20034,40045,20039,300321,600
France354,80047,40028,90027,60026,00020,20017,40021,40022,40030,100296,200
Sweden29,40027,40084,00037,60018,6009,1005,8009,70012,80011,200245,600
Belgium313,00015,20017,70026,90014,40011,40012,40011,80022,00035,800180,600
Austria22,80027,30016,2004,8005,1005,9007,0006,70013,80020,100129,700
Spain8,7008,10011,70012,60012,0005,7004,7005,0006,7007,10082,300
Denmark5,3004,60013,90014,4006,7005,1005,9005,1005,7006,50073,200
Italy4,80026,5006,0001,7001,8001,7007001,9007,100n/a52,200
Greece6,2002,7001,9008001,3001,3001,6004,4003,000n/a23,200
Ireland4441004004001,2003,9004,6007,70018,300
Finland12,7002,1003,6002,0008009007001,0001,3002,80017,900
Luxembourg444444003004001,7002,9005,700
Portugal1003007002,100800500300300300n/a5,400

England, Wales and Scotland indicate that firearms have been misappropriated from the police in only one incident over the past five years.

On 24 January 1997, an MP5 carbine was misappropriated when the police vehicle in which it was carried was hi-jacked by armed criminals. The vehicle and the weapon were recovered two days later.

No firearms are recorded as having been misappropriated from the Ministry of Defence police or the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Constabulary during the period concerned.

Dangerous Weapons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what further restrictions he will place on the sale and possession of swords and bayonets. [108755]

It is an offence under section 1 of the Prevention of Crime Act 1953 for any person to have with them an offensive weapon in a public place, including private premises to which the public have access. In addition the Criminal Justice Act 1988 banned the manufacture, sale and importation of 14 bladed, pointed and other offensive weapons in addition to flick knives and gravity knives, the sale of which was already banned under the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959.We are currently considering the appropriateness and feasibility of amending this legislation.

Asylum Seekers

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the total number of asylum seekers registering in each EU country (a) in the last 10 years, (b) in each of those years and (c) in total for each country ranked by number of asylum seekers per 1,000 of population. [109182]

Information on asylum applications received by each European Union country is collated by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. The annual figures for 1990 to 1999 for each European Union country are given in table 1.Table 2 shows the number of asylum applications per 1,000 of population within each European Union country.

Table 2: The number of asylum applications within European Union countries compared to their respective population sizes

Countries

Asylum applications in 1999

Estimated population in 1998

Asylum seekers per 1,000 of population

Luxembourg2,900430,0006.79
Belgium335,80010,141,0003.53
Netherlands39,30015,678,0002.51
Austria20,1008,140,0002.47
Ireland7,7003,681,0002.10
Sweden11,2008,875,0001.27
Denmark6,5005,270,0001.23
UK371,20058,649,0001.21
Germany2,395,30082,133,0001.16
Finland12,8005,154,0000.55
France330,10058,683,0000.51
Italy13,90057,369,0000.24
Spain7,10039,628,0000.24

1 Includes a government estimate for December 1999.

2 "New" applications only, that is, excluding applications which are "re-opened".

3 Applications exclude some or all dependants.

4 Indicates that value is zero, rounded to zero, or not applicable. Data refer to the number of persons unless otherwise stated.

Notes:

1. Applications rounded to the nearest 100.

2. Estimated population in 1998 rounded to the nearest 1,000, 1999 population not yet available.

3. n/a indicates not available.

4. The figures for Greece, Italy and Portugal are unavailable.

Source:

UNHCR and The Home Office.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has taken to ensure that current overstayers will not lose the right to a suspensive appeal against a decision to remove them taken after 1 October. [109670]

I refer my hon. Friend, to the reply given to my hon. Friend the Member for Walthamstow (Mr. Gerrard) on 9 February 2000, Official Report, column 167W.

Sexual Offences

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the Sex Offences review will report; when the consultation period will commence; and when consequent legislation will be introduced. [109091]

The Sex Offences Review hopes to report to Ministers in the spring. Its proposals will be published for consultation in the summer. The timing of any subsequent legislation has yet to be decided.

Racial Harassment

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many cases were reported to the police alleging racial harassment in (a) Cleveland, (b) Northern Region and (c) the United Kingdom in each of the last three years; and how many in each category resulted in a conviction. [109459]

The number of alleged racial harassment cases reported to the police is not available. The number of offences of racially aggravated harassment recorded by the police in the six months ending September 1999 is given in the table. This offence has been recorded separately by the police since 1 April 1999.

Number

Cleveland5
North East Government Region110
England and Wales5,385

No details of the convictions for this offence are currently available for this time period.

Child Abuse

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many cases were reported to the police alleging child abuse in (a) Cleveland, (b) Northern Region and (c) the United Kingdom in each of the last three years; and how many in each category resulted in a conviction. [109460]

The number of alleged child abuse cases reported to the police is not available. Recorded crime data do not give information about victims unless this is implicit in the description of the offence. The offences of gross indecency with a child, unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl under 13, and unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl under 16 are the only sexual offences recorded which explicitly involve children as victims. Offences of violence against the person which explicitly involve children as victims include cruelty to and neglect of children, abandoning a child under two years, and child abduction. There are many other violent and sexual offences which could involve children as victims. Cruelty to and neglect of children has been a recorded crime since 1 April 1998. The recorded crime figures for the other five offences given, and cruelty to and neglect of children, are as follows:

Year endingClevelandNorth East Government RegionEngland and Wales
March 1997191193,080
March 1998231062,999
March 19991121293,125
Cruelty to and neglect of children
March 199918892,300
1Compiled under the revised counting rules in force from 1 April 1998.
Conviction data, taken from the Home Office Court Proceedings Database, are not directly comparable with recorded crime figures, as they relate to individuals found guilty rather than offences. The number of persons convicted for the five offences given above from 1996 to 1998 (calendar years) are as follows:

199619971998
Cleveland537
North East Government Region252846
England and Wales475451546
The number of persons convicted for cruelty to or neglect of children from 1996 to 1998 (calendar years) are as follows:

199619971998
Cleveland314
North East Government Region192114
England and Wales293390390

Domestic Violence

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many cases were reported to the police alleging domestic violence in (a) Cleveland, (b) Northern Region and (c) the United Kingdom in each of the last three years; and how many in each category resulted in a conviction. [109461]

"Domestic violence" is not a specific offence, but a means of describing a number of offences when committed in particular circumstances. This means that the available information is derived not from the usual recorded crime statistics but from specific returns

Domestic Violence—IncidentsDomestic Violence—Persons Arrested
1996–971997–981998–991996–971997–981998–99
Avon and Somerset2,0582,4834,7917418731995
Bedfordshire4,470n/a4,923210n/a269
Cambridgeshire7009951,113213834929
Cheshire7,5168,9979,5031,6091,5931,481
City of London1233831n/a2
Cleveland4,5664,5804,8181,028870843
Cumbria2,8452,8753,268634885921
Derbyshire10,67211,57412,5851,4331,7511,666
Devon and Cornwall2,7963,2783,4531,1431,4051,423
Dorset1,6371,7162,116319286362
Durham2,1902,1741,930676687587
Dyfed-Powys1,5071,5242,106431515662
Essex7,6358,78010,8501,8171,9572,262
Gloucestershire6,2781,3091,421726685990
Greater Manchester50,79256,76256,2035,8306,5776,752
Gwent7,0004,4584,250514901889
Hampshire5,7917,4243,1286901,1621,765
Hertfordshire4,6764,2586,363604418809
Humberside1,1111,1871,14898210541,009
Kent7,1557,9669,6051,9952,7622,902
Lancashire6,2165,7606,7781,8471,6151,922
Leicestershire6,0152,6327,2461,0275731,591
Lincolnshiren/an/a1,519n/an/a331
Merseyside18,11216,86420,6122,2972,3152,497
Metropolitan police15,65014,40341,5311,74305,310
Norfolkn/a4,5174,973n/an/a1,041
North Wales5,8025,3874,3058649963,916
North Yorkshiren/a3994,024n/a243551
Northamptonshire2,6382,4012,620623582611
Northumbria12,74913,15414,4422,3612,2532,082
Nottinghamshire3,2483,3973,8031,4711,4321,473
South Wales6,7599,7917,2521,4121,9891,963
South Yorkshire95016812,209108154999
Staffordshire1,744n/an/an/an/an/a
Suffolk1,2251,6831,962517608640
Surrey1,2171,3081,653460400463
Sussex5,7956,9108,1741,4801,4911,749
Thames Valleyn/a9,90410,885n/a2,0822,340
Warwickshire4934852,500389388500
West Mercia1,867n/an/an/an/an/a
West Midlands14,01116,53820,2172,2803,6155,409
West Yorkshire18,30422,19123,6584,5675,9866,469
Wiltshire4235,9527,5633661,2441,307
Provincial Total238,975263,514310,05243,66553,18166,372
England and Wales Total254,625277,917351,58345,40853,18171,682
NE Region19,50519,90821,2904,06538103,512

submitted by police forces in England and Wales to Her Majesty's Inspector of Constabulary. The figures are set out in the table.

The definition of domestic violence used for these returns was:

"Any form of physical, sexual or emotional abuse which takes place within the context of a close relationship. In most cases, the relationship will be between partners, married, co-habiting or otherwise; or ex-partners".
Unfortunately, this definition was interpreted in differing ways by different police forces, for instance because some forces included child abuse. This prevented proper statistical comparisons or a clear understanding of what the returns indicated. From 1 April 1999, the definition of domestic violence for the purpose of statistical returns to Her Majesty's Inspector of Constabulary has been:
"The term 'domestic violence' shall be understood to mean any violence between current or former partners in an intimate relationship, wherever and whenever the violence occurs. The violence may include physical, sexual, emotional or financial abuse".

Home Detention Curfew Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his answer to the right hon. Member for Maidstone and The Weald (Miss Widdecombe) of 2 February 2000, Official Report, column 596W, how many curfewees charged with an offence while on home detention curfew were charged with an offence similar in character to that for which they were serving a sentence of imprisonment prior to being released on the curfew. [109509]

According to Prison Service records, of the 174 curfewees referred to in the answer I gave to the right hon. Member for Maidstone and The Weald (Miss Widdecombe) on 2 February, who have been charged with a further offence while subject to Home Detention Curfew, 69 have been charged with an offence similar to that for which they were serving a sentence of imprisonment prior to being released on curfew. In one case it has not been possible, in the time available, to confirm whether the further offence is similar in nature to the original offence. I will write to the hon. Member when this information is available.

Human Rights Act 1998

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the advantages and disadvantages of extending the requirement for a certificate of compatibility with the Human Rights Act 1998 to private legislation. [107914]

The Human Rights Act 1998 applies equally to Public and Private Bills, once they are enacted. Under the Human Rights Act 1998, Acts of Parliament will have to be interpreted compatibly with the Convention rights if possible. Where this is not possible, a higher court will be able to issue a declaration of incompatibility. This applies to all primary legislation as defined by the Human Rights Act, which includes private Acts, 1998.

Parliamentary Questions

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his answer of 21 December 1999, Official Report, column 493W, when the hon. Member for Torbay will receive a reply. [109448]

Drugs

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has to amend his policy on (a) cannabis and (b) class B controlled drugs; and if he will make a statement. [109507]

The Government have no plans to amend their existing policy in relation to cannabis and other Class B controlled drugs.

Racially Aggravated Offences

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if he will publish figures for race hate crimes committed in each year between 1990 and 1999 as a proportion of all reported crime; [109464]

(2) if he will publish figures for successful prosecutions of race hate crimes committed in (a) the Thames Valley police area, (b) the Metropolitan police force area and (c) England in each year between 1990 and 1999; [109463]

(3) what were the annual police figures for reported race hate crimes in (a) England, (b) the Thames Valley police area and (c) the Metropolitan police area in each year between 1990 and 1999. [109462]

Information is available on the new racially aggravated offences which were introduced under the Crime and Disorder Act in October 1998. The latest information indicates that 10,982 offences were recorded by all police forces in England and Wales for the period 1 April 1999–30 September 1999, 218 in Thames Valley and 7,473 in the Metropolitan police.Additional information is also available on the number of racist incidents that were recorded by the police which is wider in definition than crimes. Information covering 1993–94 to 1998–99 was published in December 1999 in Statistics on Race and the Criminal Justice System, a copy of which is in the Library. Owing to the broader definition of such offences than those covered by the recorded crime statistics it would be misleading to compare the two figures. It is currently not possible to say what proportion of such offences resulted in successful prosecutions.

Animal Experiments

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many licence applications involving the administration of tobacco smoke to conscious animals were granted in (a) 1996, (b) 1997 and (c) 1998; how many animals, broken down by species, were involved in the research in each year; into which severity banding the research fell; and how many animals died as a result of the research in each year; [109078](2) what account he took of section 5(4) of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 before deciding to grant project licence applications PPL/70 04972 and PPL/70 04956; and if he will make a statement; [109079](3) how many animals broken down by species were involved in PPL 170 04972 and PPL170 04956; how the tobacco smoke is administered to the animals; how many convulsive spasms each animal is expected to suffer; into which severity banding his research falls; how many animals have died to date as a result of the research; and if he will make a statement. [109077](4) if he will make it his policy to ban live testing for the effects of tobacco smoke; and if he will make a statement; [109080](5) if he will withdraw licences authorising companies to conduct live animal testing into the effects of tobacco smoke; and if he will make a statement. [109076]

The Government stand firmly by their ban on the testing of tobacco products which was announced in November 1997. There will be no approval for any such tests. Two recently approved applications are for programmes that do not test the effects of tobacco smoke, but enable the development of treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases such as bronchitis and emphysema, which seriously debilitate many people. These health problems derive mainly from smoking, including passive smoking, as well as occupationally related lung diseases, such as those caused by the inhalation of coal dust. Tobacco smoke is the only test material to model reliably the effects that will enable a better understanding of the disease processes and improved medical treatments. The licensed research programmes are to investigate medical treatments, not the safety approval of tobacco products.The Inspectorate and the Animal Procedures Committee have advised that the licences are justifiable and that the benefits to man and animals would outweigh the costs to the animals involved. As with all project licence applications, these two licences were issued only after a full and careful assessment, including whether there were alternatives which replace animal use, reduce the number of animals needed or refine the experimental design to minimise suffering.Strict conditions were made in authorising these two programmes of research. The maximum number and species of animal that may be used per year are 1,100 mice and 1,100 guinea-pigs in one; and 2,000 mice, 1,000 rats and 1,000 guinea-pigs, in the other. Tobacco smoke is to be administered by placing the animals in inhalation chambers for set periods. They are not expected to suffer convulsive spasms. the severity bands for both project licenses are classed as moderate. To date, no animals have died as a result of the research.Table 5a of the Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals shows the number of animals used in non-toxicology procedures each year. Figures for the use of tobacco as a pharmacological tool or standard are not separated out, but there were no instances where tobacco smoke was administered to conscious animals in 1996, 1997 and 1998. No licenses were issued for the administration of tobacco smoke to conscious animals and no animals were used for tobacco research in any of these three years.Table 10a of the annual statistics gives details of the number of animals used in toxicology (safety) testing. In submitting the data for this table, licensees are instructed to include tests on tobacco alternatives with data for protocols that have used tobacco in any form. Again, the tables show that no animals were used for the safety testing of tobacco of tobacco substitutes during 1996, 1997 and 1998.Evaluating research proposals involving the use of animals is difficult and requires a delicate moral balance to be struck. Scientific developments have saved many human lives and cured many illnesses and have contributed to the health of animals and the protection of the environment. Much knowledge has come from experiments on animals. To have failed to allow that work may have resulted in many humans dying and suffering where instead they have been cured or helped. The Government want to prevent unnecessary experiments involving animals but it would be immoral, in our view, to deny victims of diseases like bronchitis and emphysema the assistance that new scientific knowledge could bring from work such as projects PPL 70/04972 and PPL 70/04956.

Hillsborough Inquiry

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when copies of the information which formed the background to the Hillsborough inquiry will be moved to Liverpool; and where in the city they will be made available for public access. [109342]

Copies of the evidence considered by Lord Justice Stuart-Smith were placed in the Library following the scrutiny of the Hillsborough disaster. In response to earlier representations by my hon. Friend the Member for Crosby (Mrs. Curtis-Thomas), it was confirmed the House is willing to loan the material to a nominated library in Liverpool.

Health

Quality Protects Initiative

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what is the time currently taken by each police force to make police checks under the Quality Protects Initiative. [108214]

I have been asked to reply. Separate information in the form requested is not available centrally.

Geriatric Care

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate he has made of the weekly cost of keeping an elderly person (a) in an NHS ward and (b) in a residential home; and if he will make a statement. [109477]

The cost per week of patients using a bed for the medical speciality of geriatrics was estimated to be £903 in 1998–99.The weekly cost of keeping an elderly person in a residential home during 1997–98 is estimated to have been £252. Figures for 1998–99 and 1999–2000 are not available.

Prostate Cancer

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many prostate cancer operations there were in each health authority in each of the past 10 years. [102592]

Influenza

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (a) how many cases of influenza per 100,000 there have to be for an influenza outbreak to be defined as an epidemic and (b) how many cases of influenza per 100,000 there were on 11 January. [105677]

The epidemiologists' definition of an epidemic is an increase in the frequency of occurrence of a disease in a population above its baseline level for a specified period of time. The term epidemic can be used when describing the pattern of either infectious or chronic diseases in the population.Administrative definitions can be set for diseases in which an arbitrary threshold is selected above which the term "epidemic" is applied. In the case of influenza, the Department introduced in 1996 an administrative definition of an "epidemic" for a rate of consultation (with a sample of general practices) of 400 per 100,000 population in a week.Such influenza activity in England is thus monitored through the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) sentinel surveillance scheme. This records the number of first visits to a general practitioner with influenza-illness. Other respiratory illnesses prevalent at this time of year are recorded separately.This system does not and cannot measure the real incidence of influenza since it is restricted to those people who visit their general practitioner. This year a major campaign was run to encourage people to choose their own remedy, to consult a pharmacist and to use NHS Direct, as alternative sources of advice.The severity of the disease itself can also vary from year to year. This year the elderly have been particularly affected by the complications of influenza. The level of cases of acute bronchitis, a serious complication of influenza, is the highest the RCGP surveillance system has seen for 15 years. In describing epidemics some other countries formally include measures of severity in the definition of an epidemic. For example, the United States declares an epidemic when the proportion of deaths due to pneumonia and influenza passes a certain threshold.The latest confirmed figures from the RCGP show an overall rate of consultation of 236 per 100,000 for England for the week ending 16 January 2000.

Priority Health Targets (Shropshire)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will make a statement on the progress made by Shropshire Health Authority on the Government's priority health targets of cancer, coronary heart disease, mental health and accidents. [105529]

Shropshire Health Authority is making good progress in relation to these four priority areas. The local trend in premature mortality from all cancers has been declining over the past decade. Data for September 19991 show that all referrals for breast cancer are being seen within the standard two weeks at both the Royal Shrewsbury Hospitals National Health Service Trust and the Princess Royal Hospital NHS Trust.The health authority is well on course to meet its target to reduce the death rate from coronary heart disease and stroke in people under 75 by at least 40 per cent. by 2010. The health authority is hopeful that it will meet the target in 2006.The mental health target is to reduce the death rate from suicide and undetermined injury by at least 20 per cent. by 2010. Shropshire has one of the lowest rates of suicide in the West Midlands and there is a downward trend in the figures.Shropshire has identified a need to focus on preventing serious and fatal casualties from road traffic accidents. Particular attention is being placed on the 15–24 years age group and the health authority is planning several actions to take this forward.

Source:

1 Quarterly Monitoring Cancer Waiting (QMCW) 1999–2000 Q2

Bcg Vaccinations

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will make a statement on how stocks of BCG vaccine are allocated on the basis of clinical need; who makes the applications; and who determines the allocation. [105193]

BCG vaccine is currently being made available at the request of clinicians who have determined, on the basis of clinical need and in accordance with existing recommendations, that an individual is at higher risk from tuberculosis and that immunisation with BCG vaccine is necessary. The Department is advised on BCG vaccination policy by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation. The recommendations are contained in the Health Departments' handbook, "Immunisation against Infectious Disease". Those at higher risk of tuberculosis include health service staff who may have contact with infectious patients or their specimens; veterinary and other staff who handle animal species known to be susceptible to tuberculosis; staff of prisons, old people's homes, refugee hostels and hostels for the homeless; contacts of cases known to be suffering from active pulmonary tuberculosis; and, immigrants from countries with a high prevalence of tuberculosis and their children and infants wherever born.Vaccine is distributed through Farillon who are the national distribution agent of all vaccines supplied as a part of the routine childhood immunisation programme. While supplies are limited, orders are accepted only for those at high risk; ultimately, the distributor has to trust the integrity of those placing orders.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when the routine BCG vaccination programme for school children in the parliamentary constituency of Brentwood and Ongar will recommence. [105194]

The schools BCG vaccination programme will recommence in England once we have assurance that uninterrupted vaccine supply can be guaranteed. The problem with the supply of BCG has been due to manufacturing problems with Medeva Pharma who provide the only licensed source of BCG vaccine. The assurances we have received so far do not allow us to give a date for restarting the programme.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many school children in the Brentwood and Ongar constituency are waiting to receive BCG vaccination. [105191]

Tuberculosis

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list the categories of children at greatest clinical risk from tuberculosis ranked in order of risk. [105176]

The categories of children at greatest risk from tuberculosis are as listed in Chapter 32 of the 1996 edition of the health departments handbook "Immunisation against Infectious Disease", copies of which are available in the Library.

Vaccines

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will make a statement about the availability of vaccines to GP surgeries and community health clinics, with particular reference to triple vaccines and TB vaccines. [105519]

The only childhood vaccine that is currently in short supply to general practitioner surgeries is the pre-school Diphtheria/Tetanus (DT) booster vaccine. A new manufacturer has recently had its DT vaccine licensed for use in the United Kingdom and the first batches are likely to be released and available at the end of February 2000. This should resolve the recent shortages of this vaccine.TB vaccines are normally used in hospitals, chest clinics and at schools sessions, and are not usually ordered by GPs. Both BCG and Tuberculin PPD vaccines have been in short supply over recent months, but continue to be available for high-risk patients.

Clinical Staff (Temporary Contracts)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans he has to offer temporary contracts in the United Kingdom to Canadian consultants, doctors and other clinical staff. [109114]

None. Current arrangements give health authorities and National Health Service trusts flexibility to offer contracts without term (i.e. permanent), fixed term contracts (i.e. short fixed term) and fixed term rolling contracts as appropriate to the circumstances of a particular appointment.

Social Security

Mrs J Duffy

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will pay compensation to Mrs. J. Duffy of Kingsbridge, following the outcome of her appeal against the Benefits Agency on 6 October 1999 and the reinstatement of her benefit. [108995]

The administration of Disability Living Allowance is a matter for Mr. Peter Mathison, the Chief Executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Peter Mathison to Mr. Anthony Steen, dated 9 February 2000:

The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question if he will pay compensation to Mrs. J. Duffy of Kingsbridge, following the outcome of her appeal against the Benefits Agency on 6 October, 1999 and the reinstatement of her benefit.
Mrs. Duffy's case has been carefully considered and an award of £50.00 consolatory special payment has been made for gross inconvenience. Mrs. Duffy has been invited to submit evidence to allow consideration of further ex-gratia payments for her out of pocket expenses.
Compensation by way of interest on delayed arrears of Disability Living Allowance is not payable in Mrs. Duffy's case as she has not been deprived of benefit as a result of clear and unambiguous official error or exceptional delay. Guidelines for which are laid down in the Department's "Financial Redress for Maladministration" manual.
I hope this is helpful.

Departmental Contracts

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is the number and value of contracts let by his Department since May 1997 to external consultants and advisers for the management of competitive tendering processes. [109454]

There have been no contracts let by the Department to external consultants and advisers for the management of competitive tendering processes during the period May 1997 to date.

New Deal (Lone Parents)

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is the reason for the numbers of ethnic minority interviewees on the New deal for lone parents who are subsequently found to be ineligible for the caseload. [109508]

All lone parents on income support are eligible to join the New Deal for Lone Parents (NDLP). The rate at which lone parents from ethnic minorities agree to participate in NDLP following an initial interview is in line with the equivalent figure for all lone parents (currently 90 per cent. and 89 per cent. respectively).The latest results show that 6.7 per cent. of all leavers from the NDLP caseload left because they became ineligible for the programme. The equivalent figure for ethnic minority lone parents is 5.1 per cent.

Notes:

1. Ethnic group is recorded for only 62 per cent. of clients at present.

2. Lone parents on the NDLP caseload may become ineligible owing to a change in circumstance, for example lone parents who re-partner.

Incomes

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many people of working age lived in (a) households with incomes below (i) 50 per cent., (ii) 60 per cent. and (iii) 70 per cent. of median household income, and (b) households with incomes below (x) 40 per cent., (y) 50 per cent. and (z) 60 per cent. of average household income, (1) before and (2) after housing costs in (A) 1997–98 and (B) 1998–99, with median and mean household incomes fixed at their 1996–97 value in real terms. [109346]

The information is in the table.

Proportion of working age people, in 1997–98, living in

households below various income thresholds defined as

percentages of 1996–97 averages in real terms
Percentage of 1996–97 Median1Percentage of 1996–97 Mean1
506070405060
BHC8142171422
AHC141924131925
1 Thresholds are calculated as percentages of 1996–97 averages in real terms

Notes:

1. The information comes from the 'Households Below Average Income' (HBAI) series. The estimates are presented on household income both Before Housing Costs (BHC) and After Housing Costs (AHC) in line with HBAI conventions. All the estimates in the table relate to adults in families where the adult male is of working age, or the adult single female is of working age.

2. Estimates are derived from the Family Resources Survey for 1997–98, and relate to Great Britain. All estimates are subject to sampling error.

3. Information for 1997–98 is the latest year available.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many children lived in (a) households with incomes below (i) 50 per cent., (ii) 60 per cent. and (iii) 70 per cent. of median household income and (b) in households with incomes below (x) 40 per cent., (y) 50 per cent. and (z) 60 per cent. of mean household income, (1) before and (2) after housing costs in (A) 1997–98 and (B) 1998–99, with median and mean household income fixed at their 1996–97 value in real terms. [109347]

The information is in the table.

Proportion of children, in 1997–98, living in households below

various income thresholds defined as percentages of the 1996–97

averages in real terms
Percentage of 1996–97 Median1Percentage of 1996–97 Mean1
506070405060
BHC122435102537
AHC223240203342
1 Thresholds are calculated as percentages of 1996–97 averages in real terms.

Notes:

1. The information comes from the 'Households Below Average Income' (HBAI) series. The estimates are presented on household income both Before Housing Costs and After Housing Costs in line with HBAI conventions.

2. Children are defined as an individual aged under 16 or an unmarried 16 to 18-year-old on a course up to and including 'A' level standard or 'Highers' in Scotland.

3. Estimates are derived from the Family Resources Survey for 1997–98, and relate to Great Britain. All estimates are subject to sampling error.

4. Information for 1997–98 is the latest year available.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many adults aged under 60 years were in families in which they or their partner had been in receipt of (a) income support and (b) income based jobseeker's allowance for two years or more in (i) May 1998 and (ii) May 1999. [109348]

The information is in the table:

Caseloads of claimants and partners who are aged under 60 and

have been in receipt of IS/JSA(IB) for two years or more in

May 1998 and May 1999
Thousand
DateBenefitNumber of claimantsNumber of partners
May 1998Income Support1,364210
May 1999Income Support1,330210
May 1998Income Based JSA21350
May 1999Income Based JSA18141

Notes:

1. Figures are rounded to the nearest thousand.

2. Figures are based on cases where either the claimant or their partner or both are aged less than 60 years.

3. Income based JSA figures may include cases which have entitlement to benefit via the contributory route.

4. Based on a 5 per cent. sample, therefore subject to sampling error.

Source:

Income Support Statistical Enquiries, May 1998 and May 1999.

Jobseeker's Allowance Quarterly Statistical Enquiries 1999.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what was the median income for the bottom quintile of (a) single pensioners and (b) pensioner couples (i) before housing costs and (ii) after housing costs in (1) 1997–98 and (2) 1998–99, with median household income fixed at the July 1996 value in real terms. [109343]

The information is in the table.

Median net income of the bottom quintile of the net income distribution—1997–98
£ per week1
Income distributionMedian income of the bottom quintile
Net income before housing costs
Pensioner couples122
Single pensioners66
Net income after housing costs
Pensioner couples102
Single pensioners52
1 July 1996 prices

Notes:

1. Estimates are derived from the Family Resources Survey for 1997–98, and relate to Great Britain. All estimates are subject to sampling error.

2. Single pensioners are defined as single (non-cohabiting) people over State pension age (65 for men, 60 for women); pensioner couples are defined as couples (married or cohabiting) where the man is over State pension age.

3. All estimates are expressed in July 1996 prices and are rounded to the nearest £ per week, although they are not necessarily accurate to that degree.

4. The distribution of income has been calculated separately under the before housing costs and after housing costs measures of income. The distribution of income is also calculated separately for each group, i.e. estimates for pensioner couples show the median income for the bottom quintile of the pensioner couples' income distribution.

5. Information for 1997–98 is the latest year available.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many pensioners in (a) households with incomes below (i) 50 per cent., (ii) 60 per cent. and (iii) 70 per cent. of median household income, and (b) households with incomes below (x) 40 per cent. of average household income, (y) 50 per cent. of average household income and (z) 60 per cent. of average household income, (1) before and (2) after housing costs in (A) 1997–98 and (B) 1998–99. [109344]

The information is in the table.

Proportion of pensioners living in households below various income thresholds
BHCAHC
Percentage of Median
501112
602227
703638
Percentage of Mean
401011
502329
604042

Notes:

1. The information comes from the 'Households Below Average Income' (HBAI) series. The estimates are presented on household income both Before Housing Costs (BHC) and After Housing Costs (AHC) in line with HBAI conventions.

2. Pensioners are defined as adults in couples where the male is of state pension age or over, or single adults of state pension age or over.

3. Estimates are derived from the Family Resources Survey for 1997–98, and relate to Great Britain. All estimates are subject to sampling error.

4. Information for 1997–98 is the latest year available.

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many people of working age lived in (a) households with incomes below (i) 50 per cent., (ii) 60 per cent. and (iii) 70 per cent. of median household income and (b) households with incomes below (x) 40 per cent., (y) 50 per cent. and (z) 60 per cent. of average household income, (1) before and (2) after housing costs in (A) 1997–98 and (B) 1998–99. [109345]

The information is in the table.

Proportion of working age people living in households below various income thresholds
BHCAHC
Percentage of median
50814
601520
702125
Percentage of Mean
40814
501520
602326

Notes:

1. The information comes from the 'Households Below Average Income' (HBAI) series. The estimates are presented on household income both Before Housing Costs (BHC) and After Housing Costs (AHC) in line with HBAI conventions. All the estimates in the table relate to adults in families where the adult male is of working age, or the adult single female is of working age.

2. Estimates are derived from the Family Resources Survey for 1997–98, and relate to Great Britain. All estimates are subject to sampling error.

3. Information for 1997–98 is the latest year available.

Housing Benefit

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what steps he is taking to ensure that local authorities collect accurate and verifiable information to meet the reporting requirements of the housing benefit best value performance indicators numbers 176–180 for 2000–01. [109191]

Best value performance indicators will from this April be the main yardstick against which local authorities' performance is judged. Authorities are required to set out each year in published best value performance plans details of past performance against the indicators and challenging targets for future improved performance. These plans and the performance information they contain are subject to statutory audit.Auditors are responsible for ensuring that authorities have adequate systems in place for producing accurate performance data. In addition, the Department has made arrangements for performance data to be reported periodically by authorities as part of the normal provision of housing benefit management information.Guidance on the Housing Benefit indicators and revised statistical forms were issued by the Department to all authorities in December last year. The Benefit Fraud Inspectorate will also test the robustness of local authority performance data both as part of its on-going cycle of inspections of housing benefit administration and in its role as a best value inspectorate.

Disability Living Allowance

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what estimates he has made of the cost of making the disability living allowance mobility component available to children aged two and under. [109385]

The mobility component of Disability Living Allowance is payable at two rates. The higher rate is payable to people who are unable or virtually unable to walk and the lower rate is paid to people who need guidance and supervision out of doors on unfamiliar routes.Currently both components are payable to children from the age of five years. From April 2001, we are extending the higher rate of the mobility component to severely disabled children aged three and four years old in recognition of the fact that many children are able to walk reasonable distances unaided by the age of three years.Estimating the cost of extending either component to children aged two and under would not produce a meaningful result. This is because all children of this age have limited walking ability and will require constant guidance and supervision whilst out of doors.

Minimum Pension Guarantee

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security when he expects (1) the review of the minimum funding requirement to reach a conclusion; [109349](2) the review of the minimum funding requirement for the minimum pension guarantee to reach a conclusion. [108965]

The review of the minimum funding requirement is being carried out by the Faculty and Institute of Actuaries in partnership with the Department of Social Security. It is due to report in spring this year. We will then consider what changes should be made. There will be full consultation with the pensions industry on any changes.

Housing Benefit Fraud

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security which local authorities (a) did not submit information to his Department about fraudulent Housing Benefit cases for input into the Housing Benefit Management System in 1997–98, (b) have not installed the verification framework and (c) do not use non-redirection of benefit post powers. [107454]

[holding answer 31 January 2000]: The local authorities (LAs) in the following list did not submit any information regarding fraudulent Housing Benefit cases in Great Britain for the period 1997–98 as outlined in the Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit management information system guide.

  • Amber Valley
  • Arun
  • Basildon
  • Birmingham
  • Breckland
  • Brentwood
  • Bridgnorth
  • Caradon
  • Cardiff
  • Carrick
  • Craven
  • Croydon
  • Dacorum
  • Dumfries and Galloway
  • East Dorset
  • East Lothian
  • Enfield
  • Epping Forest
  • Falkirk
  • Glasgow
  • Hertsmere
  • Highland
  • Leominster
  • Mendip
  • Mid Sussex
  • Midlothian
  • Mole Valley
  • Monmouthshire
  • Neath Port Talbot
  • Newport
  • North Ayrshire
  • North Cornwall
  • North Warwickshire
  • North Wiltshire
  • Norwich
  • Peterborough
  • Powys
  • Richmondshire
  • Ryedale
  • Salisbury
  • Scottish Borders
  • Slough
  • South Norfolk
  • Tamworth
  • Torfaen
  • Trafford
  • Uttlesford
  • Waverley
  • West Dumbartonshire
  • West Lothian
  • Westminster
  • Wigan
  • Wokingham
We have made it clear to all LAs that an additional £100 million was available to enable them all to implement fully the Verification Framework (VF) by March 2001. At 7 February 2000, 237 authorities have already been funded or accepted the offer of funds to implement fully the VF and we are processing a further seven recent applications for funding. Of the remaining authorities, some have started to implement parts of the VF or are operating their own local versions and others have not yet informed us of their intentions to implement. It would be inaccurate to describe such authorities as not implementing the VF.

The following list names those authorities that have either already been funded or have accepted a recent offer of funds or have submitted an application for funding which is currently being processed.

  • Aberdeenshire
  • Adur
  • Alnwick
  • Amber Valley
  • Anglesey
  • Argyll and Bute
  • Arun
  • Ashfield
  • Ashford
  • Aylesbury Vale
  • Babergh
  • Barking (LB)
  • Barnet (LB)
  • Barrow in Furness
  • Basingstoke
  • Bassetlaw
  • Bedford
  • Birmingham
  • Blaby
  • Blaenau Gwent
  • Bolton
  • Boston
  • Bournemouth
  • Bracknell
  • Bradford
  • Braintree
  • Breckland
  • Bridgend
  • Bristol
  • Broadland
  • Bromsgrove
  • Broxbourne
  • Burnley
  • Cambridge
  • Canterbury
  • Carlisle
  • Carrick
  • Castle Point
  • Cheltenham
  • Chester
  • Chester-le-Street
  • Chesterfield
  • Chichester
  • Chiltern
  • Chorley
  • Clackmannanshire
  • Colchester
  • Congleton
  • Conwy
  • Costwold
  • Crewe and Nantwich
  • Croydon (LB)
  • Darlington
  • Daventry
  • Derwentside
  • Dover
  • Dudley
  • Dumfries and Galloway
  • Durham
  • Ealing L.B.
  • East Devon
  • East Dorset
  • East Dunbartonshire
  • East Hampshire
  • East Hertfordshire
  • East Lothian
  • East Northampton
  • East Riding of Yorkshire
  • East Staffordshire
  • Eastbourne
  • Eastleigh
  • Eden
  • Ellesmere Port
  • Enfield (LB)
  • Epping Forest
  • Epsom and Ewell
  • Erewash
  • Exeter
  • Falkirk
  • Fareham
  • Gateshead
  • Gedling
  • Gosport
  • Gravesham
  • Great Yarmouth
  • Greenwich (LB)
  • Guildford
  • Gwynedd
  • Hackney (LB)
  • Halton
  • Harborough
  • Haringey (LB)
  • Harrow (LB)
  • Hart
  • Hartlepool
  • Herefordshire
  • High Peak
  • Horsham
  • Hounslow (LB)
  • Huntingdon
  • Hyndburn
  • Inverclyde
  • Ipswich
  • Isle of Wight
  • Islington (LB)
  • Kennet
  • Kensington and Chelsea
  • Kerrier
  • Kettering
  • King's Lynn and West Norfolk
  • Kingston Upon Hull
  • Knowsley
  • Leeds
  • Leicester City
  • Lewisham (LB)
  • Lichfield
  • Lincoln
  • Liverpool
  • Macclesfield
  • Maldon
  • Malvern Hills
  • Medway Towns
  • Melton
  • Mid Devon
  • Mid Sussex
  • Milton Keynes
  • Mole Valley
  • Monmouthshire
  • Neath Port Talbot
  • New Forest
  • Newcastle-under-Lyme
  • Newham (LB)
  • North Cornwall
  • North Dorset
  • North East Derbyshire
  • North East Lincolnshire
  • North Hertfordshire
  • North Lanarkshire
  • North Norfolk
  • North Shropshire
  • North Somerset
  • North Warwickshire
  • North Wiltshire
  • Norwich
  • Nottingham
  • Nuneaton
  • Oadby and Wigston
  • Oldham
  • Oswestry
  • Oxford
  • Penwith
  • Peterborough
  • Plymouth
  • Poole
  • Portsmouth
  • Purbeck
  • Reading
  • Redbridge (LB)
  • Redcar and Cleveland
  • Reigate and Banstead
  • Renfrewshire
  • Restormel
  • Rhondda, Cynon, Taff
  • Ribble Valley
  • Richmond upon Thames
  • Richmondshire DC
  • Rochdale
  • Rother
  • Rugby
  • Runnymede
  • Rushcliffe
  • Ryedale
  • Salisbury
  • Scarborough BC
  • Sedgefield
  • Sevenoaks
  • Sheffield
  • Shepway
  • Slough
  • South Ayrshire
  • South Bucks
  • South Cambridgeshire
  • South Gloucestershire
  • South Kesteven
  • South Lakeland
  • South Lanarkshire
  • South Norfolk
  • South Northants
  • South Ribble
  • South Staffordshire
  • South Tyneside
  • Southampton
  • Southend-on-Sea
  • Southwark (LB)
  • Spelthorne
  • St. Albans
  • St. Edmundsbury
  • Stafford
  • Staffordshire Moorlands
  • Stevenage
  • Stockport
  • Stockton-on-Tees
  • Stratford-upon-Avon
  • Stroud
  • Sunderland
  • Surrey Heath
  • Sutton (LB)
  • Swansea
  • Swindon
  • Tameside
  • Taunton Deane
  • Teesdale
  • Teignbridge
  • Test Valley
  • Tewkesbury
  • Thurrock
  • Tonbridge and Malling
  • Torbay
  • Torridge
  • Trafford
  • Tunbridge Wells
  • Vale of White Horse
  • Wandsworth (LB)
  • Waveney
  • Wear Valley
  • Wellingborough
  • Welwyn Hatfield
  • West Dorset
  • West Lancashire
  • West Oxfordshire
  • West Wiltshire
  • Weymouth and Portland
  • Wigan
  • Winchester
  • Windsor and Maidenhead
  • Wirral
  • Woking
  • Wokingham
  • Wolverhampton
  • Worthing
  • Wychavon
  • Wycombe
  • Wyre

The Royal Mail has advised that as at the end of January the 248 local authorities in the following list have implemented in full the Royal Mail "do not redirect" service. Of the remaining 161 authorities, a number are preparing to implement the service and some are operating their own local arrangements. It would be inaccurate to describe such authorities as not operating "non-redirection" of post. However, information on which authorities fall into these categories could be collected only at disproportionate cost.

  • Aberdeen City Council
  • Aberdeenshire Council
  • Adur District Council
  • Allerdale
  • Alnwick
  • Amber Valley
  • Angus
  • Ashfield
  • Ashford
  • Aylesbury
  • Babergh
  • Barnet
  • Barnsley
  • Basildon
  • Basingstoke and Deane
  • Bassetlaw
  • Bath and North East Somerset
  • Berwick Upon Tweed
  • Bexley
  • Birmingham
  • Blaby
  • Blackburn with Darwen
  • Blackpool
  • Blyth Valley
  • Bolton
  • Boston
  • Bournemouth
  • Bracknell Forest
  • Bradford
  • Braintree
  • Brent
  • Brentwood
  • Bridgnorth
  • Bristol
  • Bromsgrove
  • Broxstowe
  • Caerphilly
  • Calderdale
  • Cambridge
  • Camden
  • Canterbury
  • Cardiff
  • Carmarthenshire
  • Castle Morpeth
  • Cheltenham
  • Cherwell
  • Chester
  • Chichcester
  • Chiltern
  • Chorley
  • Christchurch
  • City and County of Swansea
  • City of London
  • Clackmannanshire
  • Congleton
  • Conwy
  • Corby
  • Cotswold
  • Craven
  • Crawley
  • Crewe and Nantwich
  • Croydon
  • Daventry
  • Denbighshire
  • Derby
  • Derbyshire Dales
  • Doncaster
  • Dundee
  • Durham
  • East Cambridgeshire
  • East Hampshire
  • East Lindsey
  • East Northamptonshire
  • East Renfrewshire
  • East Riding of Yorkshire
  • Eastbourne
  • Edinburgh
  • Epping Forest
  • Fareham
  • Fenland
  • Fife
  • Forest Heath
  • Forest of Dean
  • Fylde
  • Gedling
  • Glasgow
  • Gloucester
  • Gosport
  • Greenwich
  • Guildford
  • Hackney
  • Halton
  • Hambleton
  • Hammersmith and Fulham
  • Harlow
  • Harrogate
  • Harrow
  • Hart
  • Hartlepool
  • Hastings
  • Herefordshire
  • Hertsmere
  • High Peak
  • Hillingdon
  • Hounslow
  • Ipswich
  • Kennet
  • Kerrier
  • Kingston Upon Hull
  • Kirklees
  • Lancaster
  • Lewes
  • Lewisham
  • Lincoln
  • Liverpool
  • Luton
  • Macclesfield
  • Maldon
  • Manchester
  • Melton
  • Mendip
  • Merton
  • Mid Bedfordshire
  • Mid Suffolk
  • Mid Sussex
  • Middlesbrough
  • Midlothian
  • Monmouth
  • Neath Port Talbot

  • New Forest
  • Newark and Sherwood
  • Newcastle-under-Lyme
  • Newcastle upon Tyne
  • Newham
  • North Ayrshire
  • North Cornwall
  • North Devon
  • North Dorset
  • North East Derbyshire
  • North Kesteven
  • North Lanarkshire
  • North Wiltshire
  • Northampton
  • Nuneaton and Bedworth
  • Oldham
  • Orkney Islands
  • Oxford
  • Poole
  • Portsmouth
  • Preston
  • Purbeck
  • Reading
  • Redcar and Cleveland
  • Redditch
  • Renfrewshire
  • Restormel
  • Rhondda Cynon Taff
  • Ribble Valley
  • Richmond upon Thames
  • Richmondshire
  • Rochdale
  • Rochford
  • Rossendale
  • Rother
  • Rotherham
  • Windsor and Maidenhead
  • Runnymede
  • Rushcliffe
  • Rushmoor
  • Rutland
  • Ryedale
  • Salisbury
  • Scarborough
  • Scottish Borders
  • Sedgefield
  • Sedgemoor
  • Selby
  • Sevenoaks
  • Shepway
  • Shetland Islands
  • Shrewsbury and Atcham
  • Slough
  • Solihull
  • South Buckinghamshire
  • South Cambridgeshire
  • South Holland
  • South Lanarkshire
  • South Norfolk
  • South Oxfordshire
  • South Ribble
  • South Somerset
  • South Staffs
  • South Tyneside
  • Southampton
  • Southend-on-Sea
  • Spelthorne
  • St. Albans

  • St. Helens
  • Stafford
  • Stevenage
  • Stirling
  • Stockport
  • Stoke-on-Trent
  • Stratford-upon-Avon
  • Stroud
  • Sunderland
  • Surrey Heath
  • Tameside
  • Tandridge
  • Taunton Deane
  • Teesdale
  • Telford and Wrekin
  • Tendring
  • Test Valley
  • Tewkesbury
  • Thanet
  • Three Rivers
  • Thurrock
  • Tunbridge and Malling
  • Torbay
  • Torridge
  • Trafford
  • Tynedale
  • Vale of Glamorgan
  • Vale of the White Horse
  • Vale Royal
  • Wakefield
  • Warrington
  • Warwick
  • Waveney
  • Waverley
  • Wealden
  • West Berkshire
  • West Lancashire
  • West Oxfordshire
  • West Wiltshire
  • Western Isles
  • Wigan
  • Winchester
  • Wirral
  • Woking
  • Wokingham
  • Wrexham
  • Wychavon
  • Wyre
  • York

Prime Minister

Iran

To ask the Prime Minister, pursuant to his answer of 24 January 2000, Official Report, column 4W, what discussions he has had with the Government of Iran concerning the supply of heroin from Afghanistan to the United Kingdom via Iran. [108234]

[holding answer 7 February 2000]: I did not discuss this issue with Dr. Kharrazi during his recent visit, but the subject was covered by my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary. Co-operation between the United Kingdom and Iran to stem the flow of drugs from Afghanistan forms an important part of the developing UK/Iran relationship. We have provided nearly £1.5 million over the past year for anti-drugs projects in Iran, and with our EU Partners will continue to support Iranian efforts to counter this mutual problem.

Nuclear Non-Proliferation

To ask the Prime Minister who will represent the United Kingdom at the conference on nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament in April and May 2000. [109107]

My hon. Friend the Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office will deliver the UK address to the Plenary Session of the Non Proliferation Treaty Review Conference.

Benefit Payment Methods

To ask the Prime Minister, pursuant to his oral statement of 2 February 2000, Official Report, column 1036, what arrangements will be made to ensure that those who wish it may continue to collect their benefits in cash. [109504]

We are moving to automated credit transfer from 2003 as a modern, more secure and efficient method of paying benefits. As I made clear in my reply of 2 February, I expect that by then the Post Office will have developed more agency arrangements with banks to provide banking services—it already has arrangements with Alliance and Leicester, Lloyds TSB and the Co-operative Bank. This will enable benefit recipients to withdraw the full amount of their entitlement in cash at the Post Office if they want.In addition, the Post Office is planning to install 3,000 cash machines in local Post Offices.

Council Of Europe

To ask the Prime Minister, pursuant to his answer of 3 February 2000, Official Report, columns 673–74W, on the Council of Europe, if he will list each case relating to an Independent Commonwealth State heard by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the past five years, and the sums received in reimbursement of the United Kingdom's costs of hosting the appeals, including the costs of the judges. [109242]

The table shows the numbers of appeals and petitions for leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council from independent Commonwealth countries in each of the last five years. No direct contribution to the costs of running the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council is made by the countries concerned as such, save that certain countries, especially New Zealand, provide (at their own expense) serving judges to sit as members of the Judicial Committee from time to time. However, court fees are payable by the parties to proceedings, which in some cases are the governments or other public authorities of the countries concerned. The table also shows the total fee income of the Judicial Committee in each of the last five years, the greater part of which will have been paid in respect of petitions and appeals from independent Commonwealth countries.

Year

Appeals heard

Petitions heard

Total fee income (£)

1995425535,439.59
1996516267,914.10
1997466070,715.36
1998427471,421.45
1999447731,228.90

Scotland

Research Contracts

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, pursuant to his answer of 20 December 1999, Official Report, columns 385–86W, what restrictions were placed on contractors carrying out research projects funded by his Department in 1999 in respect of them discussing their findings with journalists (a) before and (b) after publication. [108199]

The various Departments within the Scottish Executive have their own devolved research programmes and strategies. While there are some differences in the precise detail of contracts relating to each programme, generally researchers are actively encouraged to publish their work.The Scottish Executive's standard Conditions of Contract do however specify that consultants cannot disclose the results of research they are working on without the prior approval of the commissioning body. This is consistent with HM Treasury guidance on procurement and the use of confidentiality clauses (CUP Guidance 59D).

Departmental Expenditure Limit

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what proposals he has to amend the Scotland Office departmental expenditure limit and running costs limit for 1999–2000.[108700]

Subject to Parliamentary approval of the necessary Supplementary Estimate for Class XIII, Vote I Scotland and Transfers to the Scottish Consolidated Fund, the Departmental Expenditure Limit for 1999–2000 will be increased by £74,385,000 from £14,123,448,000 to £14,197,833,000.The change consists of: increases of £21,500,000 for the 2000 Hill Livestock Compensatory Allowances Scheme; £4,852,000 for local authority funding of Kosovan evacuees; £26,440,000 for the cost of the Lockerbie trial (which are to be met from the Reserve); £32,583,000 from a draw forward of ERDF funds; £13,857,000 for clinical negligence costs (announced in the Chancellor's pre-budget report); £3,980,000 transferred from the Home Office (Class IV Vote I) for the costs of grants to Asylum Seekers; £1,500,000 from the Department of Education for Northern Ireland for tuition fees for students domiciled in Northern Ireland undertaking courses of higher education in Scotland; and £3,600,000 from the DEL reserve for additional support to the Forestry Commission; a decrease of £35,000,000 for a transfer to the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (Class III, Vote 6) for the bus fuel duty rebate scheme; and other minor transfers giving rise to a net increase of £1,073,000.These increases will be offset by transfers to and from other Departmental Expenditure Limits or be treated as a charge on the DEL reserve and will not therefore add to the planned total of public expenditure.

Departmental Contracts

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what is the number and value of contracts let by his Department since May 1997 to external consultants and advisers for the management of competitive tendering processes. [109453]

My Department's competitive tendering processes are overseen by officials. Specialist external support is commonly obtained in connection with such exercises, for example, to provide professional advice on construction projects or specialist technical advice on IT projects. Information on contracts placed for external advice in connection with competitive tendering exercises is not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will list for the financial year 1998–99 (a) the number and (b) the total value of contracts let by his Department with external consultants and advisers that (i) were put out to competitive tender, (ii) were not put out to competitive tender and (iii) were let on a non-commercial basis, stating in each case the names of the individuals or organisations that have carried out the work. [109267]

[holding answer 9 February 2000]: It is Government policy that all goods and services, including consultancy, should be acquired on the basis of value for money and therefore on a commercial basis, following competition, unless there are convincing reasons to the contrary. Information regarding the breakdown between contracts which were, and which were not, awarded following competition is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Departmental Secondees

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many staff were seconded from the private sector to his Department in (a) May 1997 to April 1998, (b) May 1998 to April 1999 and (c) May 1999 to the latest date for which figures are available, stating in each case the companies from which staff have been seconded. [109294]

[holding answer 9 February 2000]: Secondments and attachments are part of the Interchange Initiative, which promotes the exchange of people and good practice between the Civil Service and other organisations. The Private sector inward secondments to The Scottish Office for the periods requested are as follows:

Private sector secondments
May 1997 to April 1998May 1998 to April 1999May 1999 to June 1999
Balfouf and Manson (Solicitors)221
Bank of Scotland11
BP1
Fife Careers Ltd.11
Project Management International PLC11
Shepherd and Wedderburn (Solicitors)1
There have been no inward secondments in my Department since 1 July 1999.

Treasury

Pensions Mis-Selling

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the average time taken for the Government Actuaries Department to complete the headroom check where a pensions mis-selling case involves excess contributions; and if he will make a statement. [109220]

[holding answer 8 February 2000]: The information requested cannot be obtained without disproportionate cost. The Government Actuary's Department (GAD) has no general responsibility for work on compensating victims of pensions mis-selling, but it does provide actuarial services to a number of public service pension schemes whose members were mis-sold personal pensions in the past. In most of the main public service pension schemes the number of cases involving excess contributions is relatively small, and the normal procedures for carrying out headroom checks have been applied without causing delay. In the Teachers' Pension Scheme there has been a large number of such cases and new procedures are being implemented to allow the scheme administrators (Capita Teachers' Pensions) to carry out most of the calculations using tables supplied by GAD. This should allow speedier processing.

Tobacco Tax

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much revenue was raised from each of the taxes payable on each category of tobacco products in the last year for which figures are available. [109100]

Excise duty receipts for each category of tobacco products are shown in HM Customs and Excise Annual Report 1998–99, table E2. The VAT received on cigarettes is estimated at £1,655 million in 1998–99, and the VAT on all other tobacco products is estimated at £115 million. VAT has been estimated from Office for National Statistics figures for household consumption on cigarettes and other tobacco products. No separate figures are available for VAT on cigars, hand-rolling and other smoking and chewing tobacco.

Child Benefit

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to his answer of 1 February 2000, Official Report, column 579W, if he will estimate the yield from tapering away child benefit in the hands of the highest earner in a couple according to the thresholds and tapering mechanism envisaged for children's tax credits, whereby benefit would be tapered away from couples containing a higher rate tax payer. [108616]

The Government will introduce a new Children's Tax Credit from April 2001. To ensure that support for the family is increased in the fairest way, it will be tapered away from families where there is a higher rate taxpayer. The long-term goal is to bring together the different strands of support for children in Working Families Tax Credit, Income Support and the Children's Tax Credit to create an integrated and seamless system of financial support, building upon the foundation of universal Child Benefit.However, if Child Benefit were to be tapered away from families where there is a higher rate taxpayer along the lines envisaged in the hon. Member's proposal, the estimated yield would currently be £600 million in a full year.

Working Families Tax Credit

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what are the (a) gross earnings, (b) earnings after income tax and national insurance contributions and (c) entitlements to the working families tax credit of a dual-earner couple with two children under the age of 11 years, both earning the minimum wage and where one works full-time and the other 16 hours a week; [107801](2) what are the

(a) gross earnings, (b) earnings after income tax and national insurance contributions and (c) entitlements to the working families tax credit of a single parent with two children under the age of 11 years, earning the minimum wage and working (i) full-time and (ii) 16 hours a week. [107739]

The figures requested are given in the table.

£/week
Couple, one working full-time, one working 16 hours a weekLone parent working full-timeLone parent working 16 hours a week
Gross earnings183.60126.0057.60
Earnings net of income tax and National Insurance Contributions175.33117.7357.60
Amount of Working Families Tax Credit56.1287.8092.00

Childcare Tax Credit

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will place in the Library the responses he has so far received to his consultation on an integrated child credit set out in the Treasury Paper, "Supporting Children Through the Tax and Benefit System". [108753]

The Treasury receives Budget representations and letters on a range of topics, including the Integrated Child Credit. As is usual practice, it is not our intention to publish them.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the steady-state cost of providing the childcare tax credit to all households with a child below the age of one year on the current tapers, irrespective of whether anyone is in work, assuming that households with a mother in the first (a) 18 and (b) six weeks of maternity leave are not included. [107651]

The childcare tax credit is available to families in receipt of the Working Families' Tax Credit or Disabled Persons's Tax Credit who meet the work requirements and have eligible child care costs. There are no plans to make it available to families where no-one is in work.If a separate weekly credit of £70 were to be given to all families with a child under one, subject to a taper of 55 per cent. for net income over £90 per week, the estimated cost for 2000–01 would be about £800 million. If households with a mother in receipt of statutory maternity pay are not included, the cost would reduce by about £30 million for the first 18 weeks of maternity pay and by about £10 million for the first six weeks of maternity pay.It has been assumed that the start of maternity pay coincides with the birth of the child, and that those mothers on Income Support would still receive the £70 credit, since statutory maternity pay is taken into account when calculating Income Support.

Children (Merseyside)

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many children aged 15 years or under live in (a) the Birkenhead constituency and (b) at Merseyside constituencies in total. [109350]

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the Director of the Office for National Statistics. I have asked him to reply.

Letter from John Pullinger, on behalf of Dr. Holt, to Mr. Frank Field, dated 10 February 2000:

The Director of the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has been asked to reply to your parliamentary question asking for the number of children aged 15 years or under who live in a) the Birkenhead constituency and b) Merseyside constituencies in total. I am replying in Dr Holt's absence.
Mid-year population estimates are not compiled for areas such as parliamentary constituencies. The lowest level at which these are available is the local authority level. Each local authority in Merseyside Metropolitan County is made up of at least two parliamentary constituencies. Data is therefore unavailable for the parliamentary constituencies within the county, one of which is Birkenhead. The table provided shows the numbers of children aged 15 years or under resident in each local authority in Merseyside as well as Merseyside as a whole. Also shown is how the local authorities are made up of parliamentary constituencies. These estimates are the mid-1998 population estimates which are the most recent available.

Mid-1998 population estimates for the number of children aged 15 or under in Merseyside and its constituent local authorities

County/local authority

Number of children aged 15 and under

Parliamentary constituencies contained in each local authority

Merseyside

294,400
Knowsley37,000Knowsley, North and Sefton, East1
Knowsley, South
Liverpool98,600Liverpool, Garston
Liverpool, Riverside
Liverpool, Walton
Liverpool, Wavertree
Liverpool, West Derby
St. Helens35,700St. Helens, North
St. Helens, South
Sefton56,400Bootle
Crosby
Knowsley, North and Sefton, East2
Southport
Wirral66,800Birkenhead
Wallasey
Wirral, South
Wirral, West

1 Part in Knowsley and part in Sefton

2 Part in Sefton and part in Knowsley

Note:

Figures may not add exactly in this table because they have been rounded to the nearest hundred

Source:

ONS, Population Estimates Unit

Birth Statistics

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what were the annual figures from 1970 until the present for the overall number of births outside of marriage by teenagers as a percentage of the overall number of births by teenagers in the United Kingdom. [109466]

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the Director of the Office for National Statistics. I have asked him to reply.

Letter from John Pullinger, on behalf of Dr. Holt, to Mr. Shaun Woodward dated 10 February 2000:

The Director of the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has been asked to reply to your parliamentary question on the annual figures from 1970 until the present for the overall number of births outside of marriage by teenagers as a percentage of the overall number of births by teenagers in the United Kingdom. I am replying in Dr Holt's absence.
The attached table shows the percentage of live births for teenagers (aged under 20) outside marriage from 1970 to present in the UK.

Year

Percentage of births outside marriage

197025.2
197125.6
197226.9
197327.6
197429.6
197531.4

Year

Percentage of births outside marriage

197633.3
197735.8
197837.5
197939.5
198041.5
198145.5
198250.6
198355.1
198459.7
198563.9
198668.4
198772.4
198875.6
198978.2
199080.2
199183.0
199283.9
199385.2
199485.9
199587.2
199688.6
199789.3
199889.7

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what were the annual figures from 1970 until the present for the overall number of births outside of marriage (1) for teenagers of ethnic minority groups as a percentage of the overall number of ethnic minority teenage births in the UK; [109465](2) for ethnic minority groups as a percentage of the overall number of ethnic minority births in the UK. [109467]

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the Director of the Office for National Statistics. I have asked him to reply.

Letter from John Pullinger, on behalf of Dr. Holt, to Mr. Shaun Woodward, dated 10 February 2000:

The Director of the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has been asked to reply to your parliamentary questions on the percentage of births outside marriage by ethnic minority. I am replying in Dr. Holt's absence.
The current form of birth registration does not include ethnicity. Figures on live births by country of birth of mother are available in Birth Statistics 1998, FM1 which is available in the House of Commons Library. However, it should be noted that birthplace does not necessarily indicate ethnic origin or race. More information on these statistics can be found in an article in Population Trends 52, 1988.

Wales

Nurses' Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what talks he has had concerning nurses' pay with (a) other departments and (b) the First Secretary; and if he will make a statement. [108827]

I recently met my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health to discuss health issues generally and health issues in Wales in particular. I also meet regularly with the First Secretary to discuss health issues in Wales.

On 17 January, the Department of Health and the National Assembly for Wales accepted the Review Body recommendations for nurses pay.

Departmental Expenditure Limit

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what proposals there are to amend the Wales Office departmental expenditure limit for 1999–2000. [108699]

Subject to Parliamentary approval of the necessary Supplementary Estimate for Class XIV, Vote 1 (The Welsh Office, the Wales Office and payments to the National Assembly for Wales) the Welsh Departmental Expenditure Limit for 1999–2000 will be increased by £8,285,000 from £7,217,489,000 to £7,225,774,000. The increase is a result of net transfers to other Government Departments of £74,000 and additional funding of £7,939,000 and £420,000 for Health and Agriculture respectively.There is an increase in the provision of Welfare to Work of £548,000 as a result of end-year flexibility entitlement of £300,000 and additional funding of £248,000 announced in the Pre-Budget Report.Transfers are from Class 1 Vote 1 (£200,000), Class 2 Vote 1 (£11,000), Class 3 Vote 2 (£113,000), Class 3 Vote 3 (£150,000), Class 18 Vote 1 (£300,000) and to Class 2 Vote 1 (£177,000), Class 10 Vote 2 (£260,000) and Class 4 Vote 1 (£411,000). The balance will be met by a charge on the Departmental Expenditure Limit Reserve for the increases announced in the Pre-Budget Report and the Aid Package for farmers and will not therefore add to the planned total of public expenditure.

Agriculture, Fisheries And Food

Sheep Premium

11.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he last met representatives of the farming industry to discuss the levels of sheep annual premium; and if he will make a statement. [107890]

We regularly meet representatives of the farming industry who raise many topics including the sheep annual premium.

Pig Industry

12.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will introduce further measures to support exports of pigmeat. [107892]

I have made representations to the Agriculture Commissioner in Brussels to increase export refunds as a way of proving additional support to the pig sector.

18.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on state aid to the pig sector. [107899]

We are well aware of the representations that continue to be made for some form of aid to be introduced as compensation for what the industry sees as the imposition of unfair additional costs as a result of BSE. This matter has been discussed many times with the pig industry. The points they are making are well understood, but this is not an easy issue. The cost would be considerable and it would have to conform with strict EU rules. Communications with the European Commission have shown how difficult this would be. This is an issue which Ministers have looked at very closely and will continue to do so. As the Prime Minister said on 1 February any investment by Government must be linked to long-term change in the structure of the industry. It must also be part of an agrees overall strategy; to this end, my officials are in touch with the National Pig Association and others.

19.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what recent discussions has he had with (a) producers and (b) others on the problems facing the United Kingdom pig industry. [107900]

Ministers are in frequent contact with a number of organisations representing producers and others to discuss the state of the UK pig industry. We have also discussed this matter with the European Agriculture Commissioner.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make a statement on progress made towards an EU-wide ban on the stall and tether system for raising pigs. [108601]

The EU Commission's proposals for a new Directive on pig welfare are well overdue. Its Scientific Veterinary Committee's report, on which these proposals must be based, was published in 1997, and we lose no opportunity to remind the Commission of the need for progress in this area.

Horticulture

13.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what recent discussions he has had with representatives of the horticulture industry. [107893]

My right hon. Friend the Minister met a wide cross-section of the horticultural industry when he opened Hortex 2000 at Telford on 18 January.

Common Agricultural Policy

15.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what steps he is taking to promote the institutional reform of the common agricultural policy. [107896]

We will pursue opportunities created by anticipated market pressures, the reviews contained within the Agenda 2000 agreement and the existing commitment to review the sugar regime by 2001 to push for the reform process started at Berlin to be completed.

Mobile Abattoirs

16.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will make it his policy to encourage the introduction of mobile abattoirs. [107897]

Mobile abattoir facilities can have attractions for a range of interests and may provide welfare benefits. MAFF have recently awarded a grant to the Humane Slaughter Association to support the development of a mobile slaughtering service in central southern England. MAFF Veterinary Meat Hygiene Advisers are available to advise those interested in developing mobile abattoirs.

Organic Farming

17.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what plans he has to review the level of financial support for organic farming. [107898]

A review of aid for conversion to organic farming is in progress. The results of the review will provide the basis for a revised organic aid scheme under the England Rural Development Programme, for which I have announced an allocation of £140 million over the life of the programme.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what assessment he has made of the environmental benefits of organic farming. [107902]

Evaluation of the environmental impact of organic farming is one of the three main objectives of the Ministry's organic R&D programme, for which £2.1 million has been allocated for 1999–2000. Field studies on biodiversity and soil fertility on organic farms, following earlier desk studies and a study of nutrient cycling are in progress. Work on nitrates and ammonia emissions has recently been completed.

Meat Inspection

20.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will report progress on implementing a new system of meat inspection. [107901]

The Meat Industry Red Tape Working Group recommended in its report published on 13 December 1999 that the current meat inspection rules be replaced by a risk-based system of checks applying Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) principles. We have accepted this recommendation, but a new meat inspection system to replace existing controls will entail changes to EU legislation. We strongly support the Commission's initiatives to review and modernise meat hygiene controls and will be pressing for early progress.

Food Chain Group Report

21.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what representations he has received following the publication of the report of the Food Chain Group. [107903]

The Food Chain Group report has been welcomed by many interests across the supply chain as a significant contribution to the drive to improve agri-food competitiveness. Over 1,000 copies have been sent to interested parties. We intend to review progress in the summer.

Labelling

22.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what steps he is taking to promote compulsory country of origin labelling within the European Union. [107904]

Following consultation with industry and enforcement authorities we published revised guidance on origin labelling on 1 February making it clear that origin labels on food must be clear and unambiguous. This is an important step forward in our drive for better labelling and more informed choice. We will encourage the European Commission to take similar steps at EU level and raise the issue for wider international discussion at the forthcoming meeting of the Codex Committee for Food Labelling in Ottawa in May.

Regional Development Agencies

23.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what recent discussions he has had with the English regional development agencies on strengthening the regional aspects of policies and programmes for supporting agriculture. [107905]

I met Vincent Watts, Chairman of the East of England Development Agency, and Rural Board Members and officials from the other RDAs on 27 January. We had a useful discussion about the England Rural Development Plan 2000–06 among other issues. The ERDP contains proposals for supporting the rural economy of each region, tailored to meet specific regional needs, which were drawn up in full collaboration with the RDAs and other regional partners.

Farming (Government Support)

24.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the total amount of financial support provided to farmers by the Government in the most recent year for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement. [107906]

The total value of EU and UK Exchequer funded subsidies for farming paid in the UK in 1997–98 was £3,582.8 million. This includes market support measures which are not paid directly to farmers, but which benefit them indirectly.

Fur Farming (Prohibition) Bill

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he last met representatives of animal welfare organisations to discuss progress on the Fur Farming (Prohibition) Bill. [107895]

I am in regular contact with representatives of animal welfare organisations on a wide range of issues. It is of course true that their concerns on fur farming would be met by the proposed ban, although the basis of the ban is that fur farming is wrong in itself, apart from any considerations of animal welfare.

Organophosphates

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, pursuant to the Minister of State's letter of 16 December, reference 133662, when he expects to receive advice from the Veterinary Products Committee in relation to organophosphorous sheep dips; and if he will make a statement. [104398]

[holding answer 17 January 2000]: The Veterinary Products Committee (VPC)'s report was published on 20 December 1999, Official Report, column 446W. Following consideration of reports from the Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment (COT) and the Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), the VPC advised the temporary withdrawal from the market of all organophosphorous sheep dips pending the introduction of improved containers for concentrated dip. That advice was accepted and action has been taken on implementation. Copies of the VPC's and COT's reports are in the Library of the House.

Genetically Modified Organisms

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what pesticide approvals for glufosinate ammonium have been given in respect of trials of genetically modified crops carried out under Part B of Council Directive 90/220 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms. [109221]

[holding answer 8 February 2000]: To date we have granted four experimental approvals under the Plant Protection Products Regulations 1995 (as amended) for the use of glufosinate ammonium on genetically modified crops. These would permit uses in trials of genetically modified crops carried out under Part B of Council Directive 90/220.Details of experimental approvals have not been published for reasons of commercial confidentiality. We have initiated a review of the current arrangements to see if there is scope for greater openness and transparency.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list the antibiotic marker genes, and the antibiotics to which they convey resistance, that have been used in the genetic modification of crops from which genetically modified foods available in the United Kingdom have been produced in the last five years. [108624]

The only foods available in the UK which have been produced from GM crops containing antibiotic marker genes are highly processed products in which all the genetic material, including antibiotic marker genes, has been rendered inactive through extensive degradation. The two marker genes, in either a complete or disrupted form, that have been used in these crops are kanamycin and ampicillin resistance genes. The intact genes convey resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics including kanamycin, neomycin and geneticin; and narrow spectrum . lactam antibiotics such as ampicillin and amoxycillin respectively.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what recent research has been undertaken into the possible effects of antibiotic resistance gene markers retained in foods produced by the genetic modification of crops on (a) humans and (b) animals; and if he will make a statement. [108620]

MAFF is funding the following research into the possible effects of antibiotic resistance gene markers retained in foods produced by the genetic modification of crops, all of which are due to be completed in 2001.

Project code

Title

Contractor

FS0225Evaluating the risk of the transfer or DNA between micro organisms in the gut and between micro organisms and gut cellsNewcastle University
FS0227Assessment of the risks of transferring antibiotic resistance determinants from transgenic plants to micro-organismsLeeds University
FS0228Dissemination of DNA and antibiotic resistance genes via rumen micro-organismsRowett Research Institute
FS0229Risk of gene transfer from genetically modified crop plants to gut bacteriaInstitute of Food Research

Over-30-Months Scheme

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) if he will make a statement setting out the criteria employed by the Intervention Board in determining the selection of slaughterhouses to carry out the requirements of the over 30-months-scheme; [105292](2) if he will make a statement setting out the reasons why the Interventions Board terminated its contract with the Nottingham processing company for the over-30-months scheme. [105299]

[holding answer 19 January 2000]: OTMS slaughter contracts, effective from 4 January 2000, have been awarded to 20 abattoirs. Decisions were reached following a competitive tender under which bids were evaluated against previously published objective criteria, including quality of service, price, ability to offer a dedicated service, ease of supervision, throughput and location.All the bids for a particular area of the country were scored against each of the criteria and aggregate scores were compared. Nottingham Processing Company scored well, but their aggregate score was less than the scores of the five successful companies in the Midlands region.

Beef Sales

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what plans he has to promote the sale of beef to non-EU countries. [107562]

I am currently leading efforts to persuade the Governments of those countries that the trade have identified as key potential markets, to lift restrictions on the import of British beef. The programme includes direct approaches to these administrations by our local Posts, and continuing liaison between veterinary authorities; Ministers on visits abroad are briefed to raise the issue as appropriate and similar opportunities are identified when Ministers for relevant countries are in the UK. I am also in touch with their relevant overseas representatives in London.Furthermore, promotion of British meat generally at home and abroad is the responsibility of the Meat and Livestock Commission. The Department routinely works with them and other interested organisations to try to open up new (and expand existing) markets and to promote exports via trade fairs and other events world wide. A number of such events are planned.

Food Surpluses

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list the sales of food surpluses from the European Union to countries outside the union during the last 12 months. [108013]

Details of UK intervention stocks sold outside the European Union during the 12 months of 1999 are:

CommodityTonnes
Beef0
Barley687,916
Wheat25,346
Butter0
Skimmed milk powder10
1 Although no skimmed milk powder was "sold" outside the European Union in 1999, 15,000 tonnes was supplied to Russia under a Community food aid scheme.
Figures for similar sales from other member states are not yet available.

Oath Of Allegiance

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many letters he has received since I May 1997 on (a) constituency matters and (b) other matters of Government policy from each of those Members of the House who have not taken the Oath of Allegiance. [108404]

[holding answer 3 February 2000]: I am unable to provide this information. Details of correspondence between Members of the House and my Department—including the number received—must be treated in confidence.

Correspondence

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he will reply to the letter from the right hon. Member for Berwick-upon-Tweed dated 16 November 1999, concerning the transfer of responsibility for the private water supply at Harwood Village. [108626]

I replied to the letter from the right hon. Member on 7 February 2000.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when he will reply to the letter from the right hon. Member for Berwick-upon-Tweed dated 27 October concerning the Government's policy on organic farming. [108627]

I replied to the letter from the right hon. Member for Berwick-upon-Tweed on 31 January 2000.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food when the Minister of State will reply to the letter from the hon. Member for Mid-Worcestershire of 16 November 1999 about leaf minors. [109008]

A letter to the hon. Member for Mid-Worcestershire was sent on 4 February 2000 by my noble Friend Baroness Hayman.

Badger Culling

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) if he will make a statement on the progress of the Randomised Badger Culling trial; [108571](2) how many of the badger culling trials are fully operational. [108572]

Six triplets have so far been enrolled into the badger culling trial. Culling has taken place in three of these, and surveying has started in the others. Work is currently suspended in one triplet. We expect to announce the remaining triplets this year.

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the cost of TB compensation paid to farmers (a) within the Krebs Trial areas and (b) outside the trial areas during 1998–99; and what is his provision for compensation payments in (i) 1999–2000, (ii) 2000–01 and (iii) 2001–02. [108377]

[holding answer 3 February 2000]: The cost of TB compensation paid within the Krebs trial areas is not separately recorded.The TB compensation paid to farmers in England in 1998–99 amounted to £3.775 million. The estimated outturn for 1999–2000 is £5.0 million, and the provisional allocation for 2000–01 is £5.99 million. The provision for 2001–02 has yet to be determined.

Beef Special Premium Scheme

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what are the most common reasons for rejecting claims made under the Beef Special Premium Scheme. [108483]

The most common reasons for rejecting claims as a percentage of the total rejections are as follows:

  • 1. Beef cattle stocked more intensively than two livestock units per hectare (58 per cent.).
  • 2. Significant claimant errors which cannot be disregarded under EU regulations (10 per cent.).
  • 3. Discrepancies discovered during inspection (5 per cent.).
  • Departmental Secondees

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many staff were seconded from the private sector to his Department in (a) May 1997 to April 1998, (b) May 1998 to April 1999 and (c) May 1999 to the latest date for which figures are available, stating in each case the companies from which staff have been seconded. [109290]

    [holding answer 9 February 2000]: The information requested is as follows:

  • (a) May 1997-April 1998: One, duration three months, Royal Bank of Scotland;
  • (b) May 1998-April 1999: One, duration three weeks, Manor Bakeries;
  • (c) May 1999-January 2000: None.
  • Cattle

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list for each of the last two years for which records are available (a) the total number of cattle slaughtered for food in the UK and (b) their gender. [109338]

    The requested figures are shown in the table. The gender of slaughtered calves is not collected.

    (a) UK cattle slaughtered for human consumption1
    (Th. head)
    199819992
    Adult cattle2,2972,217
    Male1,4451,338
    Female853879
    Calves3275
    1 Excludes cattle slaughtered under the over thirty months scheme and the Selective Cull and calves slaughtered under the Calf Processing Aid Scheme
    2 Provisional

    Animal Slaughter

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1) if he will meet his French counterpart to discuss the Eid el Kebir festival and the steps being taken by the French Government to enforce the law relating to animal slaughter; and if he will make a statement; [108651](2) if he will prevent the export of sheep destined for the festival of Eid el Kebir; and if he will make a statement. [108650]

    [holding answer 7 February 2000]: The Government have no legal power to ban the export of livestock to another member state (in this case France) because of the way they may be treated there. The French authorities are responsible for enforcement of EU welfare rules in France, and we have drawn their attention to the very serious breaches of welfare rules that have occurred during this festival in recent years.As the European Commission have responsibility for ensuring that member states implement and enforce the rules my right hon. Friend the Minister has written to the Commissioner for Health and Consumer Protection pressing very hard for suitable action to be taken.

    Redundant Agricultural Buildings

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what grants his Department makes available to farmers to help them convert redundant agricultural buildings; and if he will make a statement. [108710]

    The England Rural Development Plan sets out my Department's proposal to run a new Rural Enterprise Scheme, under Article 33 of the Rural Development Regulation, to aid farm diversification and other activities. These grants would cover the conversion of redundant agricultural buildings, subject to planning permission being granted. The Plan proposes expenditure of £152 million between 2000 and 2006, subject to the Spending Review 2000 and approval from the European Commission.

    Flooding

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many leaflets that describe flood risks to a specified area of the UK have been produced by the Environment Agency; and how many members of the public have (a) contacted the Environment Agency's Flood Line and (b) been sent such leaflets. [109003]

    The Environment Agency is responsible only for England and Wales. As part of its national flood awareness campaign launched last October, the Agency published 160 local flood warning information leaflets detailing local flood warning arrangements and contact numbers. In addition, approximately 311,000 flood kits, comprising a waterproof reusable bag and the relevant local flood information leaflet, were mailed to homes and businesses in England and Wales. The campaign marked the launch of Flood Line which, as at 28 January, had received a total of 57,211 calls. Of these, some 30,000 were received over the Christmas period when severe weather affected the south and south west of England.

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will estimate how many houses are at risk from flooding in the UK; and what estimate he has made of how many houses will be at risk from flooding in (a) five, (b) 10, (c) 15, (d) 20, (e) 25, (f) 50 and (g) 100 years; and what assumptions he has made in determining whether a house is at risk from coastal and river flooding. [109005]

    UK figures are not available as flood and coastal defence is a devolved responsibility. The Environment Agency is continuing its work to estimate the number of properties within the natural flood plains of England and Wales. Based on the best available scientific and forecasting knowledge, this figure was last year estimated to be 1.6 million.There are no forecasts for future years as it is not possible to predict where development will take place, nor what decisions will be made about future defences. The Government will be issuing revised guidance in support of its policy of discouraging inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding. In addition, the Agency is working with local planning authorities to ensure that its "Policy and Practice for the Protection of Floodplains" guidance is implemented to reduce the likelihood of new houses being built in flood risk areas in the future.

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many times the Environment Agency and his Department have given advice to (a) individuals, (b) local councils, (c) building societies and (d) any others to desist from building new houses in floodplains and other areas at risk from flooding; whether the Environment Agency and his Department have discussed with insurance companies, their trade associations and similar corporate entities the risks of insuring such properties in such areas at risk from flooding; and whether exchange of data, estimates, calculations and assessments with regard to flood risks in the UK has taken place between his Department and the Environment Agency and such bodies since May 1997. [108996]

    Government policy is to discourage inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding. Advice to English local planning authorities is contained in DoE Circular 30/92 entitled "Development and Flood Risk". This guidance is currently being revised and a consultation document is expected to be issued shortly.Neither MAFF nor DETR have been directly involved in specific advice to desist from building new houses in floodplains. However, in 1998–99 the Environment Agency received 77,502 requests for information for England and Wales, but this total is not broken down into individual categories. An individual can receive information on flood risk by visiting the Agency's offices or through correspondence. The Agency also dealt with 23,896 searches from solicitors, which would include information on flood risk if relevant.The Agency commented on 110,764 planning applications, which include information on flood risk. In line with new Government targets, the Agency will, from June 2000, be reporting on their response to planning applications, identifying cases where:

  • 1. the Agency sustained objections on flood risk grounds; and
  • 2. final decisions, either by the LPA or on appeal, were in line with, or contrary to Agency advice.
  • My Department, the DETR and the Environment Agency have fairly regular contact with the insurance industry about flood risks. This includes sharing the results of a number of R&D projects undertaken by the insurance industry, and attendance at seminars about managing flood risk. The information in the Agency's flood risk maps is being made publicly available and so may be used by the insurance industry.

    The insurance industry generally continues to offer flood risk cover, in all areas, as part of ordinary household policies.

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food how many uninsured properties have been flooded since 1990 in the United Kingdom; what records he keeps of individual incidents; and if he will open those records to public scrutiny. [109002]

    No records are available on uninsured properties that have been flooded since 1990. The industry estimate that some 65–70 per cent. of domestic properties have household and building insurance which generally includes flood cover.

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what was the average cost of building and maintaining one kilometre of flood defences in the UK for (a) coastal areas and (b) river basin areas in the last 12 months; what percentage of these costs will be borne by (i) central Government and (ii) local government; and what (1) were the total costs in the United Kingdom of building and maintaining flood defences for coastal and river basin areas for each year since 1990 and (2) are the projected costs for 2000 and 2001. [108997]

    Full UK figures are not available, as flood and coastal defence is a devolved responsibility. Also, figures are not readily available for local authorities or Internal Drainage Boards. This reply covers England and Wales figures as provided for the Environment Agency only.

    The average cost of building and maintenance of one kilometre of flood defences for coastal areas is £2.5 million and £0.65 million for river basin areas. The costs will vary according to the location of the defence, with higher costs for exposed coastal regions and heavily urbanised areas in river basins.

    In 1998–99, the income raised for flood defence totalled £252 million, with the Government providing direct grants of £34 million; £203 million was provided through the levy from local government and the remainder from Internal Drainage Boards and other sources. Local Authorities are reimbursed in the following year through the Revenue Support Grant mechanism.

    The total flood defence expenditure from 1989–901998–99 and planned expenditure for 1999–00–2001–02 is as follows:

    £ million

    Capital

    Revenue

    Total

    1989–90174.692.9167.5
    1990–91193.1103.0196.1
    1991–921116.8114.1230.9
    1992–931110.8120.2231.0
    1993–941105.7124.0229.7
    1994–951113.9126.8240.7
    1995–961131.1119.0250.1
    1996–971131.4125.1256.5
    1997–981136.5137.1273.6
    1998–991117.7144.1261.8
    1999–20002124.5147.8272.3
    2000–012133.8152.9286.7
    2001–022131.4154.1285.5

    1 Actual

    2 Planned

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will publish maps produced by the Environment Agency of the Floodline programme of flood risks that threaten houses at (a) regional and (b) other levels. [109006]

    The Environment Agency's 24-hour Floodline telephone information service was launched on 18 October 1999 as part of an integrated public awareness campaign to raise awareness of flood risk and flood warning. The service covers England and Wales and enables the public to find out what flood warnings are in force, to report flooding and to request an information pack about how to prepare for floods.As a separate exercise, the Agency has released Flood Plain Maps to local authorities in England and Wales for development control and emergency planning purposes. The Agency is developing proposals to place the maps on its web site to make them freely accessible to the public. Paper copies can also be supplied upon request.

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will list the guidance given by (i) his Department and (ii) the Environment Agency to maritime district councils and county councils to deal with sea level rise and flooding from climate change; and if he will specify the funds directed to (a) coastal defences, (b) the UK climate change impact programme and (c) public awareness campaigns aiming at reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the years 1995 to 2000; how much will be made available over the next three years; and what plans he has to increase the amounts spent on such items. [108998]

    Since 1990 my Department has issued allowances for sea level rise to be taken into account by flood and coastal defence operating authorities in planning future defence options. These allowances, which take account both of the predicted impact of climate change coupled with the effect of long term geological "tilt", are as follows:

    Environment agency regionAllowance (mm per year)
    North East (South of Flamborough Head), Anglian, Thames, Southern6
    South West, Wales5
    North West, North East (North of Flamborough Head)4
    These allowances are intended to be applied to defences with a design life up to 2030. Defences with an expected life beyond this period should be adaptable to allow for any future change in predictions.These allowances have been published by the Ministry in a number of documents, including our Project Appraisal Guidance Notes for flood and coastal defence operating authorities and in the Ministry's Strategy flood and coastal defence. They also appear in DoE Circular 30/92 entitled "Development and Flood Risk" which was aimed at local planning authorities.These predictions have been reviewed against the climate change scenarios for the UK, published in October 1998 by the UK Climate Impacts Programme (DETR). Preliminary indications are that, if extreme events follow the predicted pattern of global sea level rise, these allowances should be adequate to the middle of the next century.MAFF has provided grants to operating authorities in England for new and improved sea and tidal flood defences and coast protection defences as follows:

    Year£ million
    1995–9671
    1996–9775
    1997–9861
    1998–9951
    Figures are not yet available on this basis for the current and next three years, but the total provision available for Ministry funding (both grant and Supplementary Credit Approvals) of all flood (including inland) and coastal defence is as follows:

    Year£ million
    1990–200071
    2000–0177
    2001–0279

    These plans reflect the increased provision announced following the 1998 Comprehensive Spending Review. The provision available beyond 2002 will depend on the outcome of this year's Spending Review.

    The UK Climate Impacts Programme was established in April 1997. DETR have allocated £930,764 to the Programme Office until 1 April 2000. They have also funded the production of climate change and socio-economic scenarios for the UK to underpin the work of the Programme. For the next two years the Programme's total budget is set at £918,852. Decisions on support for the Programme beyond this will be made in the light of on-going reviews of its work.

    DETR's main environmental public awareness initiatives have been "Wasting Energy Costs and the Earth" and, more recently, "Are you doing your bit?". One of the key aims of the latter campaign is to encourage people to make simple lifestyle changes to fight global warming by using energy efficiently and by changing their travel habits. The budget figures for these campaigns are:

    £ million

    Wasting Energy Costs the Earth

    1995–96

    13.6

    1996–97

    12.0

    Are you doing your bit?

    1997–98

    11.3

    1998–99

    11.7

    1999–2000

    26.5

    2000–01

    27.7

    2001–02

    27.7

    1 UK figures.

    2 England only, post devolution.

    The future campaign budget beyond 2002 will depend on the outcome of the Spending Review 2002.

    The DETR also provides grant funding to the Energy Saving Trust (EST) which runs a number of programmes designed to promote the efficient use of energy including information on energy efficiency matters for the public. EST spend on public awareness campaigns funded by DETR is:

    Year

    £ million

    1996–975.5
    1997–983.1
    1998–994.3
    1999–20004.4

    The figures include England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland up until devolution. Post-devolution DETR have retained responsibility for all budgets except Scotland. Expenditure on public awareness campaigns by the EST funded by the Scottish Executive is £0.4 million for 1990–2000. EST Budgets for 2000–01 and 2001–02 have yet to be set.

    Eu Structural Funds

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if farmers in Objective 1 areas are eligible to apply for rural development regulation money; and if he will make a statement. [108747]

    Farmers in Objective 1 areas will be eligible to apply for the Rural Development Regulation measures which the Government proposes to use. Those proposals are set out in the England Rural Development Plan and the Single Programming Document for Cornwall and the Scilly Isles. Both documents are subject to approval from the European Commission. Funding arrangements are subject to the Spending Review 2000.

    Departmental Staff

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what child care provision was made available in the financial year 1998–99 for use by (i) his departmental staff and (ii) employees of executive agencies under the control of his Department; what was the cost to parents of this child care; and how many parents used the facilities. [1088341

    Departmental and agency staff had access to 130 nursery places at six sites during 1998–99 and the subsidised cost to parents was £56 to £85 per week depending upon location. Due to shared use of some places by part-time staff, at some sites the number of users was higher than the number of places available.During the same period, holiday playscheme places were available to departmental and agency staff working at 10 sites and the subsidised cost to parents was £3.50 to £9 per day depending upon location. The number of users varied at each site and for each school holiday period.It is not possible to give separate figures for departmental and agency staff: facilities are used by both, and uptake fluctuates.

    Energy Crops

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what evaluation he has made of the environmental benefits of energy crops. [107885]

    When used instead of fossil fuels energy crops can bring about significant reductions in emissions of carbon dioxide, one of the main greenhouse gases. Studies have also indicated a range of other positive effects including benefits to biodiversity.

    Italian Abattoirs

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what reports he has received on compliance with EU directives regarding abattoirs in Italy; and if he will make a statement. [R] [107474]

    It is for the European Commission to monitor individual member States' compliance with EU Directives. The Commission's Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) carries out regular programmes of inspection visits to all member states, including visits to abattoirs and other meat plants. The last mission to Italy to check on controls in fresh meat establishments took place from 4 to 8 May 1998.We do not receive copies of FVO reports, on inspection visits, other than those to the UK, but have access to them on the European Commission's website on the Internet in the same way as anyone else. The index for the Commission's inspection mission reports is: http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg24/health/vi/reports/index en.html.

    We publicise the availability of such reports in our monthly Meat Hygiene Enforcement Report.

    Specified Risk Material

    To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food which European Commission measures relate to sheep in respect of the regulations that require the removal of specified risk material. [107239]

    [holding answer 27 January 2000]: No such measures are in force. A Commission Decision has been adopted (97/534 of 30 July 1997, on the prohibition of the use of material presenting risks as regards transmissible spongiform encephalopathies), which defines certain sheep tissues as specified risk material. Its date of application has however been repeatedly postponed and it is not currently due to enter into force until 30 June 2000.