Skip to main content

Written Statements

Volume 395: debated on Tuesday 3 December 2002

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Ministerial Statements

Tuesday 3 December 2002

Cabinet Office

Civil Defence

The aggregate amount of civil defence grants to be made for the financial year 2003–04 is £19,038,000 of which £100,000 will be retained as discretionary grant for special projects and special events deemed of benefit to the wider emergency planning community in England and Wales.The remaining £18,938,000 will be allocated to individual authorities as set out in the table below.The grants have been allocated in the same way as last year, but with each authority receiving an equal share of the additional £70,000 available. Every authority thereby receives a slight increase in grant of £386.

Local AuthorityGrant Allocation 2003–04 (£)
Anglesey/Ynys Mon61,342
Barking and Dagenham75,969
Barnet80,694
Barnsley76,076
Bath and North East Somerset90,011
Bedfordshire136,511
Bexley78,758
Birmingham187,380
Blackburn with Darwen70,658
Blackpool66,662
Blaenau Gwent63,083
Bolton82,674
Bournemouth70,122
Bracknell Forest63,899
Bradford125,756
Brent86,592
Bridgend68,323
Brighton and Hove81,172
Bristol98,486
Bromley84,980
Buckinghamshire200,557
Bury71,195
Caerphilly73,088
Calderdale74,574
Cambridgeshire163,057
Camden84,175
Cardiff87,322
Carmarthenshire73,858
Ceredigion64,143
Cheshire189,969
Conwy64,811
Cornwall189,279
Corporation of London60,145
Coventry77,776
Croydon90,666
Cumbria216,116
Darlington63,899
Denbighshire71,434
Derby76,503
Derbyshire220,459
Devon217,294
Local AuthorityGrant Allocation 2003–04 (£)
Doncaster85,516
Dorset175,886
Dudley82,908
Durham213,601
Ealing90,344
East Riding of Yorkshire72,166
East Sussex208,288
Enfield88,198
Essex315,112
Flintshire77,741
Gatehshead79,140
Gloucestershire189,960
Greater Manchester FCDA64,060
Greenwich86,482
Gwynedd67,698
Hackney88,145
Halton68,137
Hammersmith and Fulham76,719
Hampshire298,996
Haringey85,624
Harrow65,726
Hartlepool64,650
Havering77,685
Herefordshire70,229
Hertfordshire310,886
Hillingdon81,386
Hounslow80,742
Hull (Kingston upon Hull)72,265
Isle of Wight72,230
Isles of Scilly53,708
Islington83,424
Kensington and Chelsea74,788
Kent339,586
Kingston upon Thames67,654
Kirklees95,431
Knowsley74,359
Lambeth87,789
Lancashire315,233
Leeds172,987
Leicester88,896
Leicestershire192,957
Lewisham83,978
Lincolnshire212,793
Liverpool97,648
London FEPA151,825
Luton59,894
Manchester147,667
Medway81,547
Merseyside FCDA73,332
Merthyr Tydfil60,998
Merton72,053
Middlesbrough71,355
Milton Keynes81,404
Monmouthshire62,154
Neath Port Talbot70,259
Newcastle Upon Tyne102,823
Newham88,226
Newport68,616
Norfolk276,813
North East Lincolnshire71,624
North Lincolnshire69,532
North Somerset71,248
North Tyneside74,091
North Yorkshire244,523
Northamptonshire239,260
Northumberland188,122
Nottingham86,321
Nottinghamshire210,927
Oldham79,294
Oxfordshire202,459
Pembrokeshire66,735
Peterborough72,214
Plymouth81,708

Local Authority

Grant Allocation 2003–04 (£)

Poole66,635
Portsmouth74,467
Powys85,886
Reading67,386
Redbridge82,566
Redcar and Cleveland69,693
Rhondda Cynon Taff82,319
Richmond upon Thames69,424
Rochdale77,310
Rotherham81,654
Rutland56,443
Salford72,386
Sandwell88,413
Sefton84,015
Sheffield96,386
Shropshire153,834
Slough68,566
Solihull73,716
Somerset164,359
South Gloucestershire76,183
South Tyneside71,516
South Yorkshire FCDA84,356
Southampton77,470
Southend71,966
Southwark77,343
St Helens73,333
Staffordshire226,842
Stockport79,992
Stockton-on-Tees73,877
Stoke-on-Trent74,413
Suffolk221,786
Sunderland101,107
Surrey297,388
Sutton73,126
Swansea78,933
Swindon71,355
Tameside77,310
Telford and Wrekin72,385
Thurrock68,666
Torbay67,440
Torfaen64,876
Tower Hamlets93,509
Trafford75,754
Tyne and Wear FCDA34,892
Vale of Glamorgan72,385
Wakefield86,667
Walsall83,639
Waltham Forest83,532
Wandsworth79,155
Warrington72,804
Warwickshire181,722
West Berkshire67,815
West Midlands FCDA60,386
West Sussex225,386
West Yorkshire FCDA61,593
Westminster86,804
Wigan84,497
Wiltshire194,786
Windsor and Maidenhead66,796
Wirral89,861
Wokingham66,525
Wolverhampton82,030
Worcestershire186,835
Wrexham72,926
York72,220

Defence

Hms Nottingham

When the destroyer HMS NOTTINGHAM grounded in Australian waters on 7 July 2002 she sustained severe damage and flooding in the forward part of the ship. She is now on passage to the UK on a heavy lift ship and is expected to arrive in United Kingdom waters on 7 December. She will then be unloaded and towed into HM Naval Base at Portsmouth where a contract has been placed for her repair with Fleet Support Limited. The repair work— which will cost around £26M, including all materials supplied by the Department— is expected to last up to 18 months. HMS NOTTINGHAM is expected to return to operational service in November 2004.HMS NOTTINGHAM is a highly capable Type 42 destroyer designed to provide area air defence either independently or as an integral component of larger joint or coalition maritime task groups. Her key weapons, sensors and Command System were significantly upgraded during an extensive refit in 1999–2000. These improvements will enable the ship to keep pace with the increasing demands of maritime air defence during the next 10 years and will aid interoperability with key allies, in particular the USA. HMS NOTTINGHAM'S contribution will be crucial to bridging the air defence gap during the drawdown in Sea Harrier air defence aircraft beginning in 2005 and the introduction of the Type 45 Destroyer from 2007.To ease the short-term programming gap in the fleet created by HMS NOTTINGHAM'S unavailability, HMS GLASGOW, an older and less capable Type 42 is being regenerated from a planned state of lower readiness. An alternative solution which would have given HMS GLASGOW a similar capability upgrade to that received by HMS NOTTINGHAM in 1999 was considered, but the repair of HMS NOTTINGHAM was deemed to provide best value for money.

Service Pensions (Taxation)

On 25 April 2002 Official Report, columns 426—27W, I informed the House that the problem of mistaken taxation of some Service invalidity pensions was more extensive than previously understood. I reported that we had set up an internal review, independent of the staffs involved, to establish the extent of the taxation errors and expose any related problems. This review is now complete.The review has established that the taxation problem is more extensive than I indicated in April. It is now clear that some RAF pensions are affected, and that the RN pensions affected are not limited to the period 1973–99. In addition, the review has found that further work is needed on Army pensions; this is required both to re-examine more thoroughly certain cases adjudged when first reviewed as correctly taxed, and to examine for the first time some other cases previously not thought to be at risk.

The findings of the review mean that the number of files needing examination has proved considerably larger than I stated previously. I now expect it will not be possible to complete a comprehensive check for all three Services before next summer. I regret that this work cannot be done faster, but it is vital that it be done accurately, by suitably cleared staff who are also familiar with the relevant documents. The pace of the work is also affected by the lack of comprehensive computerised information distinguishing invalidity pensions from others. This has made it necessary to handle many tens of thousands of files which are not at risk in order to identify those that are. This difficulty continues to affect progress.

We are very much aware of the importance of giving as much priority as possible to examining the cases of our oldest pensioners. Although over 70 per cent, of errors identified so far affect younger pensioners, discharged in or after 1990, we anticipate that errors still to be found will include some affecting the oldest age-group. I much regret that in several of the cases recently re-examined a pensioner, previously misadvised that his pension was correctly taxed, has died before an error was recognised. In such cases the tax refund is to be paid, with due apology, to the pensioner's widow or estate.

A further problem brought to light by the review is that some of the pensions taxed in error were also affected by an underpayment of Armed Forces Pension Scheme benefits. Over 350 pensioners have so far been identified in this category, most of whom were discharged in the 1990s. The average underpayment in these cases was around £4,500. The cost to date of rectifying tax errors has been some £5M, which happens also to be an average of some £4,500 per pensioner.

The review includes a full analysis of the causes of errors and the necessary rem—edial action; the latter is already in hand. The procedures used in the conduct of the review have been validated by the National Audit Office. The NAO's letter of validation and the report of the review have been placed in the library of the House.

Army Attributable Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a further statement on the mistaken taxation of Army attributable pensions. [53048]

Since my statement to the House on 23 January 2002, Official Report, columns 891–902, the Armed Forces Personnel Administration Agency has been conducting a review to establish more clearly the exact extent of the problem with the mistaken taxation of service invaliding and attributable pensions. This work is not complete, but has revealed that some Royal Navy invaliding and attributable pensions awarded between 1973 and 1999 have also been mistakenly taxed. We will be reviewing all the case files of those who might have been affected and arranging for refunds to be made as appropriate. This will be done as quickly as possible but is expected to take some months given the need to review several thousand pension files. We will also be providing appropriate national publicity to allow those who think they might have a claim to apply for a tax refund.

Our research has not so far revealed any cases where Royal Air Force pensions were wrongly taxed and there is evidence that the RAF has had in place checks which would have uncovered cases where attributable pensions should have been exempt from tax. However, we will include the RAF in our continuing work to ensure that no error is left unidentified.

Our further work to date has confirmed that the problem was more extensive than originally understood but has also shown the complexity of the issues involved as, over time, changes have been made to the organisations responsible for administering the pensions and to the rules governing the schemes. We have therefore concluded that we should set up an internal review, completely independent of the staffs involved, to establish the precise extent of the current problems and to expose any other problems that may exist. This independent review will look across all three sevices, be launched as soon as possible and is likely to take a number of months to complete. The review team will be headed up by a senior civil servant and consist of staff drawn from the Defence Internal Audit. In order to provide external confidence, the NAO will be invited to validate the procedures. I will report the findings to the House

Transport

Car Sharing/Car Clubs

I have written to Sir Trevor Chinn, the chairman of the Motorists' Forum, welcoming their report on car sharing and car clubs and enclosing the Government's response. The response outlines further support that the Government will give to work in this field, in particular:

continued funding for an advisory service on car clubs and formal car sharing schemes;
further research to monitor car clubs in circumstances that offer the most potential for success, for example where they may help to achieve higher densities in new residential developments than might otherwise be the case; and
further research on formal car sharing schemes in institutional settings, such as the workplace, with a view to publishing best practice guidance later next year.
Copies of my letter and the Government response have been placed in the Libraries of the House.

Treasury

Public Service Pensions

Legislation governing public service pensions requires public service pensions to be increased annually by the same percentage as State earnings related pensions (additional pensions). My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions announced on 19 November 2002, Official Report, column 16WS that benefits such as additional pensions will be increased by 1.7 per cent., in line with the annual increase in the Retail Prices Index up to September 2002. Public service pensions will therefore be increased by 1.7 per cent, from 7 April 2003, except those which have been in payment for less than a year, which will receive a pro-rata increase.

Home Department

Drug Strategy

All controlled drugs are harmful and will remain illegal. Drug misuse is the biggest challenge society faces. It damages the health and life chances of individuals. It undermines family life, turns law-abiding citizens into thieves and erodes communities. It is essential that we educate the young about the dangers of drugs, prevent drug misuse, tackle the dealers to reduce the prevalence of drugs on the streets and reduce the harm drugs cause.To address this, the Government has published its Updated Drug Strategy developed to take account of new evidence of what works and focus on delivery.In 1998, the first cross-cutting strategy was introduced to tackle drug trafficking, supply and misuse. This update builds on the foundations laid and the lessons learnt. We must concentrate on the most dangerous drugs, the most damaged communities and the individuals whose addiction and chaotic lifestyles are the most harmful, both to themselves and others. Education, prevention, enforcement, treatment and harm minimisation are our most powerful tools.Setting out a range of policies and interventions, the Updated Drug Strategy provides:

a tougher focus on Class A drugs;
a stronger focus on education, enforcement and treatment to prevent and tackle problematic drug use;
more resources— direct annual expenditure for tackling drugs will rise from £1,026 million in this financial year to £1,244 million in the next financial year, £1,344 million in the year starting April 2004 to a total annual spend of nearly £1.5 billion in the year starting April 2005— an increase of 44 per cent;
a major new education campaign to be launched in Spring 2003 to drive home the risks of drug misuse. More support for parents, carers and families so they can easily access advice, help, counselling and mutual support;
more help for the young people most at risk of developing drug problems through increased outreach and community treatment and an extension of drug testing and referrals to treatment and care via the youth justice system so that by 2006, we are able to support 40,000–50,000 vulnerable young people a year;
strengthened enforcement- including new cross-regional police teams to tackle middle markets and targeted policing to crack down on crack;
a major expansion of services to refer people into treatment via the criminal justice system. We will use every opportunity from arrest, to court and sentence to identify drug-misusing offenders and engage them in treatment. Starting from next year in the highest crime areas with the worst drug problems we will roll out a comprehensive end to end approach. This will ensure that every drug addicted offender is identified through drug testing at the point of arrest and charge and given the choice at their bail hearing of entering treatment rather than entering custody. All this is backed up by extra resources for arrest referral, drug treatment and testing orders, treatment in prison and Youth Offending Institutes and for post-release treatment and support for those leaving custody;
an expansion of treatment services to ensure access is available when needed and is tailored to individual need, including residential treatment. Improved treatment for crack and cocaine users and heroin prescribing properly supervised for all those who would clinically benefit from it. By 2008, we will have developed the capacity to treat 200,000 problematic drug users each year. Funding for treatment services, including prisons, will increase by £45 million in the next financial year, £54 million for the year starting from April 2004 and £115 million from April 2005. This will be boosted by treatment funding associated with Drug Treatment and Testing Orders of nearly £10 million in the next financial year, £12 million in the year starting from April 2004 and £16 million from April 2005— bringing the total direct annual spend on treatment up to £589 million by 2005;
new aftercare and throughcare services to help those leaving prison or treatment remain free from drugs;
strengthened capacity to deliver first in the areas with the greatest problems and improved services in those areas most affected by crack use; and
revised targets which are challenging but achievable

Copies of "Updated Drug Strategy 2002 " have been placed in the Library. It is also available on the web at http://www.drugs.gov.uk

Culture, Media And Sport

New Radio Ownership Scheme

I have today deposited a copy of the draft Order and accompanying Explanatory Memorandum in the Libraries of both Houses. Copies have also been sent to the Radio Authority, the Independent Television Commission (ITC) and the Commercial Radio Companies Association. We welcome comments from anyone with an interest.

Deputy Prime Minister

Fire Service

Today I have placed copies of a report produced by the COBR-Joint Assessment Cell report, entitled "Industrial Action by the Fire Brigades Union. Contingency arrangements during the 8-day strike, 22–30 November 2002" in the Vote Office and Libraries of the House.

Prime Minister

Chief Surveillance Commissioner

I am today laying before Parliament the annual report for 2001–2002 of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner on the discharge of his functions under Part III of the Police Act 1997 and Part II of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. As required, under section 107(3A) of the Police Act 1997, after consultation with the Chief Surveillance Commissioner I can confirm that no matter has been excluded from the enclosed report.I am most grateful to Sir Andrew Leggatt and his colleagues for the work which has gone into preparing it.