Written Answers To Questions
Friday 21 May 2004
Environment, Food And Rural Affairs
Abandoned Vehicles
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many abandoned vehicles were removed by local authorities in England in (a) 2001–02 (b) 2002–03 and (c) 2003–04. [173407]
[holding answer 18 May 2004]: The number of abandoned vehicles removed by local authorities in England was as follows:
| Number of vehicles recovered by local authorities | |||
| 2001–02 | 284,400 | ||
| 2002–03 | 298,900 | ||
| Note: | Figures for 2003–2004 will be available in early 2005 | ||
Disposable Nappies
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer of 6 May, Official Report, column 1658W, on disposable nappies, whether the Waste Implementation Programme Manager met representatives of the Nappy Alliance at Ashdown House on 23rd March; and if she will make a statement on the outcome of the meeting. [174743]
[holding answer 20 May 2004]: I can confirm that the Waste Implementation Programme (WIP) Manager met with representatives of the Nappy Alliance on 23rd March. The meeting was a useful opportunity to discuss the work WIP is already taking forward through the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) to promote re-usable nappies. This work stream forms an essential part of Government's renewed drive to minimise the amount of household waste generated in England.One of the issues raised in the course of the meeting was the need to ensure that this element of Defra's waste strategy has full support across Government. In particular, this means working closely with the Department of Health to ensure that hospitals are in a position to encourage the supply of re-usable nappies, and that healthcare professionals give new parents the facts they need to make their own informed choice. Following the meeting on 23 March and the subsequent publication of the Women's Environmental Network's report 'Nappies and the NHS: Waste Prevention and a Fair Choice for Parents', I have written to the Under-Secretary at the Department of Health to make the case for a strong lead from hospitals and health trusts on this important initiative.
Farm Income
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will list the (a) crops, (b) vegetables, (c) fruit and (d) plants the growing of which will not qualify for single farm payment. [166026]
Under the Single Payments Scheme, farmers will be allocated 'entitlements' against which they may make an annual claim for payment. Such claims must be supported by an equivalent number of hectares of agricultural area, except those used for forestry, permanent crops (eg fruit trees) or used for non-agricultural activities.In addition, the amount of land used in support of a claim on which horticultural crops (those referred to in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No. 2200/96 and Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No. 2201/96 and potatoes other than those intended for manufacture of potato starch) are grown will be limited by authorisations allocated to individual growers.
Flooding
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what representations she has received regarding the recent increased assessment of flood risk in the South East; and if she will make a statement. [170837]
The Government welcome the report "Foresight Future Flooding" by Professor Sir David King published through the Office of Science and Technology on 22 April.Currently nearly two million properties are at risk of flooding in the UK from rivers and the sea and a further 80,000 are at risk from heavy downpours that overwhelm drains in urban areas. Under future scenarios in the report and assuming our approval to flood risk management does not change then annual damages could rise substantially by the 2080s. The areas at greatest risk include the South East Coast. We therefore face major challenges in managing these potential risks and associated costs.The Government are considering the implications of the report and we intend to address the findings in an initial response through a consultation document for a new flood and coastal defence strategy that I hope to publish in the summer.Each major stakeholder is committed to delivering a number of actions and my Department will oversee progress.
Greenhouse Gases
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will request the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Subsidiary Bodies to undertake an exploratory study of contraction and convergence as a potential basis for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. [171229]
[holding answer 17 May 2004]: The UK, as part of the EU, sought to open a technical dialogue on possible approaches to long-term action to tackle climate change at the UN climate change negotiations in Milan last December. The aim was to begin technical discussions on different methodologies, including contraction and convergence, to promote better understanding of the challenge facing the international community.We achieved recognition of better access to data and analytical tools relevant to implementing commitments under the Convention and the Kyoto Protocol, plus a scoping phase to develop a shared data interface to help with this, and a process to exchange further views on these issues in July 2004. The UK will continue to press for technical discussions relevant to the assessment of different methodologies.Negotiations on climate change action beyond the end of the first Kyoto Protocol commitment period in 2012 are due to commence in 2005. In the meantime, we will continue to exchange views informally with other countries on how to promote further action.
Hazardous Waste
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what plans she has to use BSE and foot and mouth disposal facilities for the handling of hazardous waste. [1712871287]
[holding answer 10 May 2004]: We have no plans to use such facilities for the handling of hazardous waste. Sites for handling hazardous waste would have to have the appropriate authorisations under the Waste Framework Directive and the Landfill Directive. The disposal by burial of animal carcases during the FMD epidemic was subject to control under the Animal Waste Directive which has now been superseded by the EU Animal By-Products Regulation. BSE infected carcases are disposed of by incineration in approved incinerators.
Household Waste
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will impose a statutory obligation on local authorities to ensure weekly collections of household waste. [174088]
[holding answer 18 May 2004]: We have no plans to require local authorities to collect household waste on a weekly basis.Decisions on the frequency of collection are a matter for each local authority, which needs to have in place a collection regime which enables it to meet its statutory duties in a way which is consistent with Best Value and takes full account of local circumstances.
Hunting
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what research the Department is undertaking into the impact of land used for hunting under the single farm payment; [169742](2) what discussions she has had with the
(a) Countryside Alliance and (b) Master of Foxhounds on the impact of the single farm payment on hunting; and whether this will qualify as an activity which will derive payments under the new scheme. [169743]
I am not aware of any research or discussions with any organisations on an inter-relationship between hunting and the new Single Payment Scheme. Hunting is not an activity that would attract payment under the Scheme, but agricultural land on which hunting takes place may be used by a farmer in support of a Single Payment claim if that activity does not lead to a breach any of the Scheme's conditions, including the obligation on the farmer to maintain the land in good agricultural and environmental condition.
Insects
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in what ways she proposes that agri-environment schemes will contribute to maintaining the UK's biodiversity, with particular reference to insects. [165305]
We regularly monitor our existing Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) and Countryside Stewardship (CS) schemes to assess their environmental benefits. This has demonstrated substantial benefits for many Biodiversity Action Plan priority habitats and species, including mammals, birds, plants and insects.Recent Defra-sponsored research has shown that simple measures such as planting a seed mix of flowers in field margins to provide pollen and nectar can attract huge numbers of insects (bumble bees, butterflies, and others) relative to the in-field crop. Full details are available at http://www.f-e-c.co.uk/Buzz/index.htm.Defra has also sponsored specific research on butterflies. This has shown that ESAs and CS schemes are slowing, and in some cases reversing, the long-term decline in numbers of England's rarer butterflies. Further details are available at http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2002/020806a.htm.Recent Defra-funded reports on 'Managing priority habitats for invertebrates' will help inform targeting and formulating of future agri-environment agreements. `Environmental Stewardship' (ES) will rationalise and replace ESAs and CS in 2005. ES will be divided into two levels: an Entry Level (ELS) and a Higher Level (HLS). ELS should include measures beneficial for biodiversity, including insects, in the wider countryside. The HLS Scheme will continue the work of ESAs and CS by targeting management on the most valuable and vulnerable farmland habitats. The options available under these new schemes will also have the advantage of having greater generic benefits for insects. Further details of these schemes can be found at http://www.defra.gov.uk/erdp/reviews/agrienv/entrylevel.htm and http://www.defra. gov.uk/erdp/reviews/agrienv/higherlevel.htm.
Methyl Bromide
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the policy of Her Majesty's Government is on the use of methyl bromide in farm and food production. [166574]
Methyl bromide is an ozone depleting substance and its production and supply are controlled under the Montreal Protocol. Its production is due to be phased out in developed countries after 31 December 2004, except for quarantine and pre-shipment purposes.
In addition, under the Protocol and the equivalent EC legislation, methyl bromide can be authorised for "critical uses" after 2004, including use in relation to farming and food production.
The Government's view is that methyl bromide is being phased out by the Protoco1 and should not be phased back in by excessive critical uses. Every effort should be made therefore to identify possible alternatives to methyl bromide use in relation to farm and food production.
Oil Care Campaign
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment she has made of the progress of the Oil Care Campaign in halving the number of oil pollution incidents in the United Kingdom by 2005. [166052]
The Oil Care Campaign is a voluntary initiative which brings together the oil industry, regulators, local authorities and other stakeholders with an interest in reducing the number and severity of oil pollution incidents affecting inland waters in the UK. It does not have any specific target for the reduction in incidents.In relation to oil pollution incidents in England and Wales, figures for the last three years provided by the Environment Agency were deposited in the House of Commons Library in January 2004.
Radioactive Waste
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs which (a) Government Departments and (b) external organisations are responsible for the long-term management of high-level radioactive waste. [159026]
High-level waste (HLW) is held and managed by British Nuclear Fuels plc (BNFL) at its Sellafield site and by the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) at its Dounreay site. Responsibility for this HLW is due to be taken over by the new Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) when it comes into being in April 2005. Government sponsorship of both the nuclear industry and the NDA is the responsibility of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). Radioactive waste management policy is the joint responsibility of The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), and the devolved Administrations for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The main nuclear site regulators are the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), the environment agencies (the Environment Agency (EA) in England and Wales and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) in Scotland) and the Office for Civil Nuclear Security (OCNS).
Refrigerants
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment. Food and Rural Affairs what quantity of (a) chlorofluorocarbons, (b) hydrochlorofluorocarbons and (c) hydrofluorocarbons have been recovered from equipment other than domestic refrigerators in each year since 1995. [169582]
The information requested is not available, as the data on the recovery of these substances do not distinguish the equipment from which they were recovered.
Single Farm Payments
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on what basis the single farm payment will be established for farmers who were in the dairy sector prior to the foot and mouth disease outbreak whose flocks were slaughtered because of the outbreak of foot and mouth disease and who restocked with (a) dairy cows and (b) beef and sheep. [169465]
Dairy farmers whose flocks were slaughtered because of the outbreak of foot and mouth disease, and who restocked with:
Sustainable Development
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what definition of sustainable development has been agreed for application across Government; and what mechanism is in place to ensure that the term is applied and claimed appropriately. [169856]
[holding answer 30 April 2004]: The UK Government's current sustainable development strategy "A better quality of life", launched in May 1999, describes sustainable development as 'ensuring a better quality of life for everyone, now and for generations to come'. It also refers to a widely used international definition, from the Brundtland Report of the 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development, of
Government publications usually refer to the 'better quality of life' description as given in our 1999 Strategy. Examples would include the departmental sustainable development strategies for the Department of Health, the Department for Trade and Industry and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, and HM Treasury's 2002 Spending Review Report.We are currently consulting, in partnership with the Scottish Executive, the Welsh Assembly Government and Northern Ireland, to develop new sustainable strategy for the UK. As part of this we are reviewing our explanation of what sustainable development means.'development which meets the need of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs'.
Two Tree Island
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will list (a) the works and (b) the cost of works on (i) Canvey Island's sea defences and (ii) Two Tree Island which are envisaged; and if she will make a statement. [170826]
Decisions on which projects are promoted and their timing rests with the operating authorities.
(i) Canvey Island's Sea Defences
Defra is not aware of any proposals for works to Canvey Island's tidal defences. The tidal flood defences around the Island are regularly monitored by the Environment Agency.
(ii) Two Tree Island
Southend borough council has recently secured planning permission for coast protection works around the south and northeast sides of the Island. The works are estimated to cost around £1 million and are due to be submitted for Defra grant aid consideration under the Coast Protection Act.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment she has made of the increased risk of flooding to Canvey Island; and what (a) research and (b) action she plans to take in the light of the increased assessment of flooding risk. [170827]
Decisions on which projects are promoted and their timing rests with the operating authorities.The Environment Agency has been researching the need for capital renewal of the internal flood defences on Canvey Island and a draft Project Appraisal Report is due to be presented to the Agency's National Review Group during this summer.Works will include the upgrading of all 12 land-drainage pumping stations on the Island. The works programme will take approx. 3 years and cost up to £6 million.Since the 1980s the Department has provided guidance to operating authorities to make allowance for climate change in the planning and appraisal of new and replacement flood and coastal defence works. This guidance has been regularly reviewed in the light of the latest research findings and supplementary guidance was most recently issued in 2003. The aim is to take a suitably precautionary approach while not diverting funds unnecessarily from the solution of problems that affect people today. The approach and guidance will be further reviewed for the new Strategy for Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether she has assessed the case for closing beaches in the vicinity of Two Tree Island as a result of the pollution from the old waste dump. [170828]
The closure of beaches is a matter for local authorities. Local authorities are advised by the Environment Agency on prevailing water quality levels. The nearest designated bathing beach is at Leigh Bell Wharf which met the EU guideline standards in 2003 and is classed as 'excellent' quality.
Warm Zones
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what funding has been allocated in (a) 2004–05, (b) 2005–06 and (c) in total to Warm Zones. [163648]
The Government provided £1 million funding for the pilot programme of five Warm Zones to run from 2001–04.An independent evaluation of the pilots is being carried out by the Energy Saving Trust on behalf of the Department to assess the effectiveness of Warm Zones.No additional funding has been allocated to Warm Zones by the Government.
World Oceans Day
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what action her Department will be taking to mark World Oceans day on 8 June. [168469]
Around the time of World Oceans day Defra plans to publish an updated delivery plan setting out the steps that the Government are taking to achieve the conservation and sustainable management of marine and coastal biodiversity and to promote better oceans governance and partnership initiatives, in line with the commitments made at the World Summit on Sustainable Development.To help progress this delivery plan the UK, together with EU partners, will be calling for the United Nations to take urgent action to protect vulnerable marine biodiversity in areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction at the forthcoming meeting of the United Nations Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea. World Oceans day coincides with this meeting.
Home Department
Department Branding
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much his Department spent on branding the Department between 1997–98 and 2003–04, broken down by (a) consultancy fees, (b) design and orders for new stationery, (c) website design and (d) other material featuring new logos. [154064]
The Home Office logo has not been subject to redesign in 2003–04, but in the previous years you refer to, work was undertaken. The logo was redesigned to ensure the Home Office work was clear to the public and stakeholders.Costs involved were as follows:
(a) and (b) research, project management and design and orders for new stationer y–£147,505.06.
(c)website design–£18 024.50.
(d)The logo element of 'other material featuring new logos between 1997–98 and 2003–04' would be covered in individual project/publication/media initiatives and were not funded by or attributed to the corporate logo change initiative.
No costs were written off due to lack of use or destruction of materials featuring previous logos, as the low levels of old stock continued to be used.
Departmental Response Times
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the average length of time was for a substantive response his Department to (a) written questions, (b) hon. Members' written correspondence and (c) public correspondence in 2003–04. [1705291]
The last published performance figures for the Home Office showed that 37 per cent. of all parliamentary questions and 56 per cent. of Members written correspondence were answered within parliamentary deadlines. I have been very clear this is not acceptable and needs to he substantially improved.As a result, last year the Department introduced a new correspondence tracking system and in the last few months our performance in meeting the targets for answering Members written correspondence to Ministers increased substantially. In relation to parliamentary questions, we are currently in the process of introducing a new system, the electronic Parliamentary Questions System (ePQS) to better monitor and manage the Department's performance.In relation to public correspondence, we are currently looking at how to improve the tracking and monitoring of performance across the Department. Figures are not currently available except at disproportionate cost.
Immigration Appeals
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the consequences of delays in dealing with cases of appeals against withdrawal of United Kingdom nationality before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission. [169803]
To date only one appeal against withdrawal of United Kingdom nationality has been lodged with the Special Immigration Appeals Commission. The administrative process for such appeals is subject to continuous review to ensure compatibility with both the public interest and the independent appeals process.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to his answer of 10 May to Question reference 169812, what the reasons are for the delay in making progress with appeals over the exercise of his powers concerning removal of nationality and indefinite leave to remain. [174144]
I have been asked to reply.The Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) has one appeal before it in relation to Deprivation of Citizenship proceedings. Such cases involve significant and complex evidence and require due consideration of public funding applications. Importantly, as with any appea1, parties need to be available and prepared to proceed. The timetable for the resolution of cases is necessarily a function of all these factors The administrative processes for appeals against Deprivation of Citizenship proceedings are subject to ongoing review to ensure compatibility with both the public interest and the independence of the judicial process.
Transport
Railways
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the Answer of 22 April 2004, Official Report, column 651W, how many of the Department of Transport's PFI projects listed on the Treasury website met the criteria for special purpose vehicles set out in the Strategic Rail Authority's strategic plan. [171521]
None of the Department for Transport projects listed on the Treasury website falls within the remit of the Strategic Rail Authority. The Highways Agency is responsible for the strategic roads, Vehicle and Operator Services Agency for the MOT privatisation, Transport for London for London Underground and the Docklands Light Rail projects and the relevant local authority for the other light rail, local roads and street lighting PFI projects.The selection criteria used to assess special purpose vehicles tendering for transport projects varies to take account of the nature of the work, the project size and duration.The legal, economic, financial and technical information required is set out in the contract advert in the Official Journal of the European Union. The information requested complies with Office of Government Commerce advice, departmental procedures and Treasury guidance on Private Finance Initiative practice.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment his Department has made of the effectiveness of the Network Rail Volume Incentive; and if he will make a statement. [174075]
The 'Volume Incentive' was first introduced by the Rail Regulator in his Access Charges Review 2000. The SRA set out its views on the continuing effectiveness of a Volume Incentive for Network Rail as part of its response to the Initial Consultation Paper of the Access Charge Review 2003. The SRA's view was that for a number of reasons, the Volume Incentive would no longer be cost effective or appropriate given the changes to the industry since it was first introduced. The Rail Regulator considered this view and the supporting reasons, along with the views of other consultees, in the course of the Access Charge Review 2003. His view was that the Volume Incentive would continue to be an effective way of encouraging Network Rail to make efficient use of a constrained network so that additional traffic could be accommodated. He therefore retained the Volume Incentive, with a number of modifications (including only rewarding Network Rail for growth above a certain threshold level) in the Final Conclusions to the Access Charge Review published in December 2003. This decision is entirely for the Rail Regulator, taking into account his statutory duties as set out in the Railways Act. 1993.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will place in the Library a copy of the (a) Strategic Rail Authority's submission to the rail regulator in December 2002 that the Network Rail Volume Incentive be removed and (b) the Rail Regulators' response. [1174076]
The documents referred to are available from the Office of the Rail Regulator's website at the following address:
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to his answer of 12 May 2004, Official Report, column 410W, on railways, what operational performance trajectory was set for the train operating companies between December 2003 and November 2004; and what the current performance is against that target. [174239]
The performance trajectory, developed by the National Task Force on behalf of the rail industry, consists of Network Rail's performance forecasts and Train Operating Companies (TOC) performance plans. The trajectory is the industry's own internal performance monitoring process and will be reviewed in October 2004.TOC performance statistics are published quarterly by the Strategic Rail Authority (SRA) in "National Rail Trends", the most recent edition of which was published in March 2004. Copies of "National Rail Trends" are placed in the House of Commons Library and published on the SRA's web site.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what international models of railway safety he has considered in the context of the Rail Review. [174815]
The rail review is considering several international models of railway safety in the course of its work.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what criteria his Department is using to evaluate options for reorganising the structure of the railways as part of the Rail Review. [173798]
As my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Transport said in his statement to the House on 19 January2004, the principles for the review are that railways must operate in the public interest, maintain commitment to public and private partnership and maintain commitment to independent economic regulation.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how he will ensure that rail safety continues to improve following changes arising from the Rail Review. [173799]
The European Railway Safety Directive requires that member states ensure that railway safety is generally maintained and, where reasonably practicable, continuously improved.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will ensure that the recommendations from Lord Cullen's public inquiry following the Ladbroke Grove rail accident are fully delivered following changes arising from the Rail Review. [173800]
Lord Cullen recommended that the Health and Safety Commission (HSC) should review compliance with his public inquiry recommendations and publish the outcome of such reviews. The safety regulator will be expected to continue to review compliance following the rail review.
Blackpool Tram System
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment his Department has made of the regeneration effects of (a) proceeding and (b) not proceeding with the proposed upgrade of the Blackpool tram system. [173914]
The regeneration impacts of proceeding and not proceeding with the tramway upgrade were assessed in an Economic Impact Report provided by the promoters. The Department has not made its own assessment.
Bristol Airport
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on proposals to expand the capacity of Bristol airport. [175098]
The Air Transport White Paper stated that the main potential for growth in the South West would be at Bristol Airport. We support the Airport's development to around 12 million passengers per annum to include a runway extension and new terminal south of the existing runway, when these are required, having due regard to the environmental impacts that would accompany its expansion.
Bus Users (London)
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the socio-economic breakdown of bus users in London. [174715]
The National Travel Survey provides the information for people aged 16 and over living in households in Great Britain for the period 1998–2000, according to their area of residence.The table shows the percentage of users in each socio-economic group, both inside and outside London. Note that tourists are not included in this breakdown:
| All persons aged16 and over | Bus users1 | |||
| socio-economic group(SEG) | Inside London | Outside London | Inside London | Outside London |
| Professional/managerial | 18 | 14 | 16 | 8 |
| Intermediate non-manual | 12 | 9 | 12 | 8 |
| Junior non-manual | 13 | 12 | 13 | 13 |
| Skilled manual | 10 | 12 | 8 | 8 |
| Other manual/other SEGs | 11 | 14 | 12 | 17 |
| Retired | 21 | 27 | 23 | 30 |
| Other economically inactive | 15 | 12 | 16 | 15 |
| All persons | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 1Use a local bus more than twice a year (in London this is 72 per cent. of all persons aged 16 and over and outside London it is 43 per cent.). | ||||
Car-Sharing
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what research his Department has undertaken into the (a) growth and (b) popularity of formal car-sharing through online systems. [173314]
I refer the hon. Member to my answer of 13 May 2004, Official Report, column 490W.
Channel Tunnel Rail Link
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much clay will be produced as a result of excavations to build the new Channel Tunnel link station at Stratford; and how it is proposed to dispose of it. [175030]
About 270,000 cubic metres of clay have been excavated to form the station box at Stratford. The clay was deposited on the Stratford Lands, where the surface is being raised by about 6 m for the redevelopment of the lands.
Civil Servants
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many civil servants were employed by communication division in his Department on the last date for which figures are available. [174326]
As at 1 May 2004, the number of staff employed in the Department's Communication Directorate was 73.1 (full time equivalents). This figure breaks down as follows:
| Number | |
| Director | 1 |
| Press Officers | 15 |
| Publications (print, publishing and external websites) | 12 |
| Publicity (campaigns) | 10.8 |
| Strategic Communications | 8.8 |
| Internal Communications | 9.5 |
| Business Management (finance, procurement, human resources, IT, business and secretarial support) | 16 |
| Total | 73.1 |
Consultants And Advisers
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much his Department and its agencies and non-departmental public bodies spent on external consultants and advisers in each of the last three years. [172434]
Details of spend on external consultants and advisers by the central Department, agencies and non-departmental public bodies is shown in the following table.
| £million | |||
| 2001–02 | 2002–03 | 2003–04 | |
| Central Department | 1— | 122.2 | 58.5 |
| Highways Agency | 179.8 | 157.5 | 169.7 |
| Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency | 3.3 | 4.0 | 3.4 |
| Driving Standards Agency | 1.2 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| Vehicle and Operator Services Agency | 2.8 | 3.3 | 3.0 |
| Vehicle Certification Agency | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Marine and Coastguard Agency | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Strategic Rail Authority | 32.0 | 54.1 | 53.0 |
| £million | |||
| 2001–02 | 2002–03 | 2003–04 | |
| Trinity House Lighthouse Service | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| The Northern Lighthouse Service | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Total | 221.1 | 347.2 | 293.6 |
| 1The Department was formed in May 2002. Figures for the central Department are not available for 2001–02 or prior years. | |||
Light Rail
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what assessment he has made of the levels of private sector investment in (a) commercial and (b) housing property along the lines of light rail routes in each year since 1997; [171947](2) what assessment he has made of the effect that light rail systems have had on urban regeneration since 1997; and if he will make a statement. [171948]
The Department makes no annual assessment of the levels of private investment along light rail routes. The Department part funded a programme of research on the regeneration impacts of Sheffield Supertram which concluded in 1997. This showed little effect, however the tram only became fully operational in 1995 and any significant changes would be more gradual.
Rolling Stock Companies
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the (a) annual capital lease charge and (b) annual heavy maintenance charge made by rolng stock companies to train operators are for (i) a two carriage class 142 Pacer train, (ii) a two carriage class 143 Pacer train, (iii) a two carriage class 156 Sprinter train, (iv) a two carriage class 150 Sprinter train and (v) a four car class 333 train. [173467]
The rate to be paid for a particular type of rolling stock for use on a particular franchise is a commercial matter between the rolling stock owner and the train operator.
Education And Skills
Education Funding
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much public money was spent on education in Chorley in each year between 1992 and 1997. [164183]
The information requested is submitted according to local education authority areas rather than districts within an area. Chorley is a district of Lancashire Local Education Authority. The information for Lancashire LEA is as follows:
| £000 | |
| Total net current expenditure | |
| 1992–93 | 649,469 |
| 1993–94 | 594,252 |
| 1994–95 | 596,785 |
| 1995–96 | 583,921 |
| 1996–97 | 590,313 |
| 1997–98 | 600,316 |
Notes:
1. The financial data are taken from Lancashire LEA's RO1 statement submitted to the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions.
2. Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEA.
3. In 1992–93 Net Current Expenditure after recharges was not collected on RO1. In this year Net Recurrent Expenditure is used and consequently figures for this year may not be strictly comparable with those for future years.
4. Figures are for Lancashire LEA prior to the local government reorganisation in 1998–99.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much public funding was spent per pupil in Heywood and Middleton in each of the last seven years. [168580]
The information requested is submitted to the Department according to local education authority areas rather than districts within an area. Heywood and Middleton is a district of Rochdale local education authority. The information for Rochdale LEA is as follows:
| Net current expenditure per pupil | |||||
| £ | |||||
| Pre-Primary Education | Primary Education | Pre-Primary and Primary Education | Secondary Education | Special Schools | |
| 1996–97 | n/a | n/a | 1,800 | 2,605 | 12,959 |
| 1997–98 | n/a | n/a | 1,841 | 2,658 | 13,211 |
| 1998–99 | n/a | n/a | 1,952 | 2,685 | 13,276 |
| 1999–2000 | 5,105 | 2,100 | 2,161 | 2,804 | 13,438 |
| 2000–01 | 12,322 | 2,315 | 2,509 | 3,070 | 15.180 |
| 2001–02 | 21,017 | 2,551 | 2,747 | 3,381 | 16,007 |
| 2002–03 | — | — | 2,793 | — | 3,690 |
Notes:
1. The financial data are taken from Rochdale LEA's Section 52 Outturn Statement submitted to the DfES from 1999–2000 onwards and the ODPM's RO1 statement previously. Expenditure was not distinguished between pre-primary and primary sectors until the inception of the Section 52 outturn statement in 1999–2000. 1999–2000 figures reflect the return of GM schools to local authority maintenance.
2. The outturn 2002–03 tables captured the data in a fundamentally different way to the previous years. Categories were aligned with the Consistent Financial Reporting framework and the spending by LEAs was no longer split by school sector. Consequently the unit costs per pupil in 2002–03 are not strictly comparable with earlier years as they include an apportionment of LEA expenditure based on pupil numbers. 2002–03 data is subject to change by the LEA. Figures are rounded to the nearest £10.
3. Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEA.
4. The NCE per pupil figures for pre-primary and primary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in the pre-primary sector and maintained primary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained nursery and primary schools sector.
5. The NCE per pupil figures for secondary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained secondary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained secondary schools sector.
6. The NCE per pupil figures for special schools relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained special schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained special schools sector.
7. Pupil data are drawn from the Annual Schools Census adjusted to be on a financial year basis.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much public funding was spent per pupil in Stalybridge and Hyde in each of the last seven years. [168759]
The information requested is submitted to the Department according to local education authority areas rather than districts within an area. Stalybridge and Hyde is a district of Tameside local education authority. The information for Tameside LEA is as follows:
| Net current expenditure per pupil | |||||
| £ | |||||
| Pre-Primary Education | Primary Education | Pre-Primary and Primary Education | Secondary Education | Special Schools | |
| 1996–97 | n/a | n/a | 1,743 | 2,304 | 12,097 |
| 1997–98 | n/a | n/a | 1,779 | 2,449 | 12,876 |
| 1998–99 | n/a | n/a | 1,929 | 2,528 | 13,371 |
| 1999–2000 | 11,672 | 2,065 | 2,116 | 2,579 | 22,081 |
| 2000–01 | 21,005 | 2,237 | 2,334 | 2,860 | 24,175 |
| 2001–02 | 25,103 | 2,690 | 2,794 | 3,221 | 21,455 |
| 2002–03 | — | 2,786 | — | 3,260 | — |
Notes:
1. The financial data are taken from Tameside LEA's Section 52 Outturn Statement submitted to the DfES from 1999–2000 onwards and the ODPM's R01 statement previously. Expenditure was not distinguished between pre-primary and primary sectors until the inception of the Section 52 outturn statement in 1999–2000. 1999–2000 figures reflect the return of GM schools to local authority maintenance.
2. The outturn 2002–03 tables captured the data in a fundamentally different way to the previous years. Categories were aligned with the Consistent Financial Reporting framework and the spending by LEAs was no longer split by school sector. Consequently the unit costs per pupil in 2002–03 are not strictly comparable with earlier years as they include an apportionment of LEA expenditure based on pupil numbers. 2002–03 data is subject to change by the LEA. Figures are adjusted to 2002–03 prices using the March 2004 GDP deflators.
3. Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEAs.
4. The NCE per pupil figures for pre-primary and primary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in the pre-primary sector and maintained primary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained nursery and primary schools sector.
5. The NCE per pupil figures for secondary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained secondary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained secondary schools sector.
6. The NCE per pupil figures for special schools relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained special schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained special schools sector.
7. Pupil data are drawn from the Annual Schools Census adjusted to be on a financial year basis.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much public money was spent on education in the constituency of West Derbyshire between (a) 1992 and 1997, (b) 1997 and 2001 and (c) 2001 and 2004. [163736]
:The information requested is submitted to the Department according to local education authority areas rather than districts within an area West Derbyshire is a district of Derbyshire Local Education Authority. The latest information for Derbyshire LEA is contained in the following table. Information on the current year 2004–05 will not be available until the end of 2005.
| Net Current Expenditure | |
| £ | |
| 1992–93 to 1996–97 | 1,740,789 |
| 1997–98 to 2000–01 | 1,104,187 |
| 2001–02 to 2002–03 | 728,225 |
Notes:
1. The financial data are taken from Derbyshire LEA's Section 52 Outturn Statement submitted to the DfES from 1999–00 onwards and the ODPM's RO1 statement previously. Figures up to and including 1996–97 are for Derbyshire LEA prior to local government reorganisation. From 1997–98 onwards Derbyshire LEA was split into Derbyshire and Derby LEAs. 1999–00 figures reflect the return of GM schools to local authority maintenance.
2. The outturn 2002–03 tables captured the data in a fundamentally different way to the previous years. Categories were aligned with the Consistent Financial Reporting framework and the spending by LEAs was no longer split by school sector. Consequently the unit costs per pupil in 2002–03 are not strictly comparable with earlier years as they include an apportionment of LEA expenditure based on pupil numbers. 2002–03 data is subject to change by the LEA. Figures are rounded to the nearest £10.
3. Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEA.
4. In 1992–93 Net Current Expenditure after recharges was not collected on RO1. In this year Net Recurrent Expenditure is used and consequently figures for this year may not be strictly comparable with those for future years
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much public funding was spent per pupil in Birkenhead in each of the last seven years. [166300]
The information requested is submitted to the Department according to local education authority areas rather than districts within an area. Birkenhead is a district of Wirral local education authority. The information for Wirral LEA is as follows:
| Net current expenditure per pupil | |||||
| Pre-primary education | Primary education | Pre-primary and primary education | Secondary education | Special schools | |
| 1996–97 | n/a | n/a | 1,830 | 2,570 | 12,350 |
| 1997–98 | n/a | n/a | 1,780 | 2,570 | 13,350 |
| 1998–99 | n/a | n/a | 2,020 | 2,690 | 13,450 |
| 1999–2000 | 20,060 | 2,120 | 2,220 | 2,850 | 15,100 |
| 2000–01 | 28,700 | 2,360 | 2,510 | 3,060 | 16,180 |
| 2001–02 | 34,050 | 2,680 | 2,850 | 3,420 | 18,400 |
| 2002–03 | — | 2,980 | — | 3,760 | — |
Notes:
1. The financial data are taken from Wirral LEA's section 52 Outturn Statement submitted to the DfES from 1999–2000 onwards and the ODPM's RO1 statement previously. Expenditure was not distinguished between pre-primary and primary sectors until the inception of the section 52 outturn statement in 1999–2000. 1999–2000 figures reflect the return of GM schools to local authority maintenance.
2. The outturn 2002–03 tables captured the data in a fundamentally different way to the previous years. Categories were aligned with the Consistent Financial Reporting framework and the spending by LEAs was no longer split by school sector. Consequently the unit costs per pupil in 2002–03 are not strictly comparable with earlier years as they include an apportionment of LEA expenditure based on pupil numbers. 2002–03 data are subject to change by the LEA. All figures are rounded to the nearest £10.
3. Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEAs.
4. The NCE per pupil figures for pre-primary and primary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in the pre-primary sector and maintained primary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained nursery and primary schools sector.
5. The NCE per pupil figures for secondary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained secondary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained secondary schools sector.
6. The NCE per pupil figures for special schools relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained special schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained special schools sector.
7. Pupil data are drawn from the Annual Schools Census adjusted to be on a financial year basis.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much public funding was spent per pupil in Wirral, South in each of the last seven years. [166624]
The information requested is submitted to the Department according to local education authority areas rather than districts within an area. Wirral, South is a district of Wirral local education authority. The information for Wirral LEA is as follows:
| Net current expenditure per pupil | |||||
| Pre-primary education | Primary education | Pre-primary and primary education | Secondary education | Special schools | |
| 1996–97 | n/a | n/a | 1,830 | 2,570 | 12,350 |
| 1997–98 | n/a | n/a | 1,780 | 2,570 | 13,350 |
| 1998–99 | n/a | n/a | 2,020 | 2,690 | 13,450 |
| 1999–2000 | 20,060 | 2,120 | 2,220 | 2,850 | 15,100 |
| 2000–01 | 28,700 | 2,360 | 2,510 | 3,060 | 16,180 |
| 2001–02 | 34,050 | 2,680 | 2,850 | 3,420 | 18,400 |
| 2002–03 | — | 2,980 | — | 3,760 | — |
Notes:
1. The financial data are taken from Wirral LEA's section 52 Outturn Statement submitted to the DfES from 1999–2000 onwards and the ODPM's RO1 statement previously. Expenditure was not distinguished between pre-primary and primary sectors until the inception of the section 52 outturn statement in 1999–2000. 1999–2000 figures reflect the return of GM schools to local authority maintenance.
2. The outturn 2002–03 tables captured the data in a fundamentally different way to the previous years. Categories were aligned with the Consistent Financial Reporting framework and the spending by LEAs was no longer split by school sector. Consequently the unit costs per pupil in 2002–03 are not strictly comparable with earlier years as they include an apportionment of LEA expenditure based on pupil numbers. 2002–03 data are subject to change by the LEA. All figures are rounded to the nearest £10.
3. Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEAs.
4. The NCE per pupil figures for pre-primary and primary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in the pre-primary sector and maintained primary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained nursery and primary schools sector.
5. The NCE per pupil figures for secondary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained secondary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained secondary schools sector.
6. The NCE per pupil figures for special schools relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained special schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained special schools sector.
7. Pupil data are drawn from the Annual Schools Census adjusted to be on a financial year basis.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much public money was spent on education in the constituency of Sittingbourne and Sheppey between (a) 1992 and 1997, (b) 1997 and 2001 and (c) 2001 and 2004. [159487]
The information requested is submitted to the Department according to local education authority areas rather than districts within an area. Sittingbourne and Sheppey is a district of Kent local education authority. The latest information available for Kent LEA is as follows.
| Net current expenditure | |
| £000 | |
| 1992–93 to 1996–97 | 2,514,790 |
| 1997–98 to 2000–01 | 2,138,194 |
| 2001–02 to 2002–03 | 1,411,520 |
Notes:
1. The financial data are taken from Kent LEA's Section 52 Outturn Statements submitted to the DfES from 1999–2000 onwards and the ODPM's R01 statement prior to then. 1999–2000 figures reflect the return of GM schools to local authority maintenance. Figures up to and including 1997–98 are for Kent LEA prior to local government re-organisation. From 1998–99 onwards parts of Kent LEA became Rochester and Gillingham LEA.
2. The outturn 2002–03 tables captured the data in a fundamentally different way to the previous years. Categories were aligned with the Consistent Financial Reporting framework and the spending by LEAs was no longer split by school sector. Consequently the unit costs per pupil in 2002–03 are not strictly comparable with earlier years as they include an apportionment of LEA expenditure based on pupil numbers. 2002–03 data is subject to change by the LEA. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10.
3. Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEA.
4. In 1992–93 NCE after recharges was not collected on R01. In this year Net Recurrent Expenditure is used and consequently figures for this year may not be strictly comparable with those for future years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much public funding was spent per pupil in Burnley in each of the last seven years. [167917]
The information requested is submitted to the Department according to local education authority areas rather than districts within an area. Burnley is a district of Lancashire local education authority. The information for Lancashire LEA is as follows:
| Net current expenditure per pupil | |||||
| £ | |||||
| Pre-primary education | Primary education | Pre-Primary and Primary Education | Secondary Education | Special Schools | |
| 1996–97 | n/a | n/a | 1,805 | 2,594 | 15,988 |
| 1997–98 | n/a | n/a | 1,824 | 2,631 | 17,315 |
| 1998–99 | n/a | n/a | 2,002 | 2,701 | 17,768 |
| 1999–00 | 7,130 | 2,108 | 2,173 | 2,763 | 18,487 |
| 2000–01 | 11,033 | 2,326 | 2,437 | 2,914 | 18,768 |
| 2001–02 | 16,391 | 2,629 | 2,797 | 3,230 | 20,597 |
| 2002–03 | — | 2,898 | — | 3,399 | — |
Notes:
1. The financial data are taken from Lancashire LEA's Section 52 Outturn Statement submitted to the DfES from 1999–2000 onwards and the ODPM's RO1 statement previously. Expenditure was not distinguished between pre-primary and primary sectors until the inception of the Section 52 outturn statement in 1999–2000. 1999–2000 figures reflect the return of GM schools to local authority maintenance. Up to 1997–98 figures are for Lancashire LEA prior to local government reorganisation. From 1998–99 onwards parts of Lancashire LEA became Blackpool and Blackburn LEAs.
2. The outturn 2002–03 tables captured the data in a fundamentally different way to the previous years. Categories were aligned with the Consistent Financial Reporting framework and the spending by LEAs was no longer split by school sector. Consequently the unit costs per pupil in 2002–03 are not strictly comparable with earlier years as they include an apportionment of LEA expenditure based on pupil numbers. 2002–03 data are subject to change by the LEA. Figures are rounded to the nearest £10.
3. Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEAs.
4. The NCE per pupil figures for pre-primary and primary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in the pre-primary sector and maintained primary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained nursery and primary schools sector.
5. The NCE per pupil figures for secondary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained secondary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained secondary schools sector.
6. The NCE per pupil figures for special schools relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained special schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained special schools sector.
7. Pupil data are drawn from the Annual Schools Census adjusted to be on a financial year basis.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much public funding was spent per pupil in the Lancashire Local Education Authority in each year since 1997. [165541]
The information requested is contained in the following table:
| Net Current Expenditure per pupil | |||||
| Pre-primary education | primary education | Pre-Primary and primary education | Secondary education | Special schools | |
| 1997–98 | 1— | 1— | 1,824 | 2,631 | 17,315 |
| 1998–99 | 1— | 1— | 2,002 | 2,701 | 17,768 |
| 1999–2000 | 7,130 | 2,108 | 2,173 | 2,763 | 18,487 |
| 2000–01 | 11,030 | 2,326 | 2,437 | 2,914 | 18,768 |
| 2001–02 | 16,391 | 2,629 | 2,797 | 3,230 | 20,597 |
| 2002–03 | — | 3,399 | — | — | — |
| 1Non Applicable | |||||
Notes:
1. The financial data are taken from Lancashire LEA's section 52 Outturn Statement submitted to the DfES from 1999–00 onwards and the ODPM's RO1 statement previously. Expenditure was not distinguished between pre-primary and primary sectors until the inception of the Section 52 outturn statement in 1999–00. 1999–00 figures reflect the return of GM schools to local authority maintenance. Up to 1997–98 figures are for Lancashire LEA prior to local government reorganisation. From 1998–99 onwards parts of Lancashire LEA became Blackpool and Blackburn LEAs.
2. The outturn 2002–03 tables captured the data in a fundamentally different way to the previous years. Categories were aligned with the Consistent Financial Reporting framework and the spending by LEAs was no longer split by school sector. Consequently the unit costs per pupil in 2002–03 are not strictly comparable with earlier years as they include an apportionment of LEA expenditure based on pupil numbers. 2002–03 data is subject to change by the LEA. Pupil data are drawn from the Annual Schools Census adjusted to be on a financial year basis.
3. Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEAs.
4. The NCE per pupil figures for pre-primary and primary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in the pre-primary sector and maintained primary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained nursery and primary schools sector.
5. The NCE per pupil figures for secondary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained secondary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained secondary schools sector.
6. The NCE per pupil figures for special schools relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained special schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained special schools sector.
Education Services (Essex)
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many teachers were employed in state schools in (a) the County of Essex in each year from 1980 to 1997 and (b) the County of Essex and the unitary authorities of Southend-on-Sea and Thurrock in each year from 1998 to 2003. [173323]
The information is shown in the following tables. The first table shows the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) regular teachers in maintained schools in Essex LEA in each January between 1980 and 19981. Data for 1987 are not available. The second table show s the number of FTE regular teachers in Essex, Southend-on-Sea and Thurrock LEAs after local government re-organisation in April 1998, in each January between 1999 and 2003.
| Essex | |
| 1980 | 13,080 |
| 1981 | 13,040 |
| 1982 | 12,820 |
| 1983 | 12,640 |
| 1984 | 12,440 |
| 1985 | 12,620 |
| 1986 | 12,000 |
| 1987 | — |
| 1988 | 12,390 |
| 1989 | 12,190 |
| 1990 | 12,360 |
| 19912 | 12,320 |
| 1992 | 12,390 |
| 1993 | 12,050 |
| 1994 | 11,980 |
| 1995 | 12,040 |
| 1996 | 12,370 |
| 1997 | 12,580 |
| 1998 | 12,560 |
| 1 Sixth form colleges are included up to 1992 | |
| 2 Estimated | |
| Essex | Southend-on-Sea | Thurrock | Total | |
| 1999 | 10,580 | 1,270 | 1,060 | 12,910 |
| 2000 | 10,400 | 1,380 | 1,110 | 12,890 |
| 2001 | 10,520 | 1,410 | 1,180 | 13,100 |
| 2002 | 10,920 | 1,520 | 1,210 | 13,650 |
| 2003 | 10,890 | 1,560 | 1,230 | 13,670 |
| Source: | ||||
| Annual survey of teachers in service and teacher vacancies. | ||||
Essex Schools
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much it cost to educate a pupil in (a) primary and (b) secondary schools in Essex in 2003–04. [172462]
The latest date for which this information is available is 2002–03 and is given in the table. The information requested for 2003–04 will not be collected by the Department until October 2004 but I will write to the hon. Member when it is available.
| Net Current Expenditure per pupil | ||
| Primary Education | Secondary Education | |
| 2002–03 | 2,950 | 3,600 |
Notes:
1. The financial data are taken from Essex LEA's Section 52 Outturn Statement submitted to the DfES. 2002–03 data is subject to change by the LEA. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10.
2. The outturn 2002–03 tables captured the data in a fundamentally different way to the previous years. Categories were aligned with the Consistent Financial Reporting framework and the spending by LEAs was no longer split by school sector. Consequently the unit costs per pupil in 2002–03 are not strictly comparable with earlier years as they include an apportionment of LEA expenditure based on pupil numbers.
3. Net current expenditure (NCE) includes expenditure within schools and also that incurred centrally by the LEA.
4. The NCE per pupil figures for primary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in the maintained primary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained primary schools sector.
5. The NCE per pupil figures for secondary relate the net current expenditure (after recharges) in maintained secondary schools to the total number of financial year pupils who are educated in the maintained secondary schools sector.
6. Pupil data are drawn from the Annual Schools Census adjusted to be on a financial year basis.
Further Education
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) what his projection is of funding for adult learning and skills provision by colleges of further education in rural areas; [175372](2) what funding provision is made for further education colleges in rural areas; and if he will make a statement. [175373]
The Department allocates funds to the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) for the provision of education and training in the post-16 learning and skills sector. The Department does not provide a specific budget to the LSC for further education colleges in rural areas. The LSC decides on allocations at individual college and regional levels from the funds allocated to it for learning participation. Information about these allocations is not collected by the Department. This is a matter for the LSC. Mark Haysom, the Council's Chief Executive, will write to the Honourable Gentleman on this matter. A copy of his reply will be placed in the House Library. The Government have set out its investment plans for 2003–04 to 2005–06 which should enable the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) to increase funding for further education significantly.
Pre-Schools
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to his answer of 17 May 2004, Official Report, column 705W, on pre-schools, what plans he has to make a degree qualification essential for teaching under-8s; and if he will make a statement. [175173]
All qualified teachers in maintained primary schools or non-maintained special schools will hold a first degree or equivalent qualification. Adults who are not qualified teachers and who do not necessarily have a degree qualification may also teach in such schools in specific circumstances set out in the Education (Specified Work and Registration) (England) Regulations 2003.
| Table A: Capital allocations: Warrington local education authority. | ||||||
| All figures in £000 | ||||||
| 1998–99 | 1999–2000 | 2000–01 | 2001–02 | 2002–03 | ||
| Assistance wth AMPs | 27 | |||||
| Basic L C Vap | 49 | 276 | ||||
| Basic Need | 1,189 | 829 | 2,389 | 3,434 | 2,453 | |
| Class Size initiative | 347 | 1,261 | 282 | 640 | 176 | |
| Condition | 1,040 | 1,517 | ||||
| Devolved Formula | 1,438 | 1,172 | 1,786 | |||
| Energy | 62 | |||||
| Modernisaton (Primary) | ||||||
| Modernisation LEA | ||||||
| Modernisation LEA | 611 | |||||
| Modernisation VA | 148 | |||||
| NDS2 | 1,083 | |||||
| NDS3 | 1,500 | |||||
| NDS4 | 2,660 | |||||
| Outside Toilets | 56 | |||||
| School Labs | 149 | 149 | ||||
| School Security | 66 | 67 | 67 | 47 | 40 | |
| Schools Access Intitiave | 69 | 100 | 140 | 229 | 298 | |
| Secondary Learning Support Units | 43 | 47 | 58 | |||
| Seed Challenge | 152 | 167 | 274 | |||
| Specialist Schools | 100 | 100 | ||||
| Staff Workspace | 60 | |||||
| Supplementary Credit Approvals | 193 | 503 | 219 | |||
| Supplementary NDS for VA Schools | 116 | |||||
| Voluntary Aided School Grant | 207 | 438 | 505 | 584 | 630 | |
| Total | 3,272 | 4,222 | 8,041 | 8,061 | 8,646 | |
School/College Funding
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what plans he has to equalise funding between schools and colleges for 16 to 19-year-olds in the Worthing area. [175448]
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given to my hon. Friend the Member for Wolverhampton, South-West (Rob Marris) on 14 May 2004, Official Report, column 623W.
Specialist Schools
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if he will list the schools in England that have a specialist status in primary musical education. [175428]
School Funding
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much capital money has been allocated to schools in Warrington, North in each year since 1997. [174659]
Since 2001 the majority of capital support has been allocated to schools and local education authorities by formula, and they decide how to invest it in line with their asset management plans. The Department does not, therefore, have complete information about capital investment at constituency level. This should be held at local authority level. Table A sets out the capital support made by the Department to Warrington local education authority (LEA) and its schools since 1998–99, in total and by programme.
Specialist school status is available for secondary (but not primary) maintained schools in England. Of the 259 secondary schools designated as specialist Arts Colleges, 181 are Performing Arts Colleges, providing an enhanced curriculum in music, dance and drama. Following the launch of the new Music specialism last year, the first two specialist Music Colleges (one of which is a combined Music and Mathematics and Computing College) will become operational in September 2004.Specialist schools must spend at least a third of their specialist school funding on delivering community development plans. These plans require schools to work in close partnership and to share enhanced facilities and curriculum expertise with a minimum of five other local schools—including feeder primary schools.
In a separate initiative, in 2002, 42 primary schools were included in pilots, with subsequent evaluation by Ofsted, of models to widen opportunities for primary pupils to learn musical instruments. Earlier this year, I announced an extra £1.5 million for music services to help all authorities to develop their own models in this area.
£
| |||
School Name
| LEA
| Amount of BID (net cost)
| Purpose of Bid
|
| The Nottingham Bluecoat School | Nottingham | 1,728,100 | New Accommodation |
| Holy Trinity CE VA Primary School | Calderdale | 937,067 | Replacement School |
| Akiva School | Barnet | 6,758,100 | New VA School |
| Our Lady of the Visitation RC Primary School | Ealing | 1,012,712 | Replacement Accommodation |
| The Avenue School | Brent | 3,420,000 | New VA School |
| Hemingfield Ellis CE Primary School | Barnsley | 1,602,400 | Replacement School |
| Richard Challoner School | Kingston upon Thames | 4,306,781 | Remodelling of School |
| Holy Trinity School | West Sussex | 3,000,000 | Expansion of School |
| Montesorri School | Brighton and Hove | 3,736,000 | New VA School |
| St. Mary of the Angels Catholic Primary School | Cheshire | 1,828,444 | Replacement School |
| Four schools—reorganisation | Devon | 13,236,880 | Reorganisation of four Schools |
| St. Andrew CE Primary School | Devon | 1,812,000 | Replacement School |
| Larmenier and Sacred Heart RC Primary School | Hammersmith and Fulham | 5,285,345 | Replacement School |
| St. Gregory's Catholic Primary School | Stoke-on-Trent | 1,551,518 | Extension to School |
| Alderman Cogan's School | Kingston upon Hull | 1,015,120 | Alterations to Existing School |
| St. Bede's RC School | North Lincolnshire | 700,019 | Independent Learning Centre |
| Bethany Junior School | Bournemouth | 1,261,171 | Remodelling and Improvements |
| Notre Dame High School | Norfolk | 3,984,632 | 14–19 Excellence Centre |
| St. George's School | Hertfordshire | 4,124,876 | Growth in Pupil Numbers |
| Sacred Heart RC Primary School | Hillingdon | 4,993,469 | Growth in Pupil Numbers |
| Ashlands Ecumenical Primary School | North Somerset | 2,072,171 | Growth in Pupil Numbers |
| St. George's Primary School | North Somerset | 2,072,171 | Growth in Pupil Numbers |
| Holy Trinity Catholic School | Cornwall | 2,790,000 | Growth in Pupil Numbers |
Teacher Training
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what support his Department gives to UK citizens living abroad who would like to return to the UK in order to undertake teacher training. [174992]
Eligibility for support from public funds in respect of Bachelor of Education and Postgraduate Certificate in Education courses in England normally depends on whether or not a person is ordinarily resident in this country or the wider European Economic Area (EEA) Employment-based teacher training schemes, the largest of which is the Graduate Teacher Programme, offer an alternative route to Qualified Teacher Status which allows candidates to be employed in schools as unqualified teachers and paid accordingly while they train. Candidates who are not ordinarily resident in EEA country can take part in these programmes on exactly the same basis as those who are.
Teachers
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what estimate the Government has made of the likely increase in salary costs of requiring all teachers to work up to the age of 60 years. [174846]
There is no existing or proposed requirement on teachers to work to the age of 60.
Vocational Training
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of the cohort of
Targeted Capital Fund
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if he will list the 23 voluntary-aided projects which were successful in their bids to the 2004–05 Targeted Capital Fund. [174735]
The details are as follows:
(a) 16, (b) 17, (c) 18, (d) 19, (e) 20 and (f) 21-year-olds (i) commenced and (ii) completed (A) NVQ level 3 courses and (B) modern apprenticeships in each year since 1992. [172625]
The proportions of 16 to 21-year-olds to have commenced either a NVQ level 3 in Learning and Skills Council (LSC) funded further education, an advanced apprenticeship or an apprenticeship in 2001/02 and 2002/03 are shown in the following table.
| Commencement rates of 16 to 21-year-olds on NVQ level 3 courses in LSC funded further education and on apprenticeships by programme and age—England: 2001/02 and 2002/03 | ||
| Percentage | ||
| Programme/Age at 31 August | 2001/02 | 2002/03 |
| NVQ 3 in LSC funded FE | ||
| 16 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 17 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 18 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| 19 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| 20 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| 21 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| All 16 to 21-year-olds | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Advanced apprenticeships1 | ||
| 16 | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 17 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| 18 | 1.5 | 1.3 |
| 19 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| 20 | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 21 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| All 16 to 21-year-olds | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Commencement rates of 16 to 21-year-olds on NVQ level 3 courses in LSC funded further education and on apprenticeships by programme and age—England: 2001/02 and 2002/03
| ||
Percentage
| ||
Programme/Age at 31 August
| 2001/02
| 2002/03
|
Apprenticeships 2
| ||
| 16 | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| 17 | 3.4 | 3.7 |
| 18 | 2.6 | 2.8 |
| 19 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| 20 | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| 21 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| All 16 to 21-year-olds | 2.6 | 2.8 |
All apprenticeships
| ||
| 16 | 6.9 | 6.6 |
| 17 | 4.7 | 4.9 |
| 18 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| 19 | 2.9 | 3.2 |
| 20 | 2.2 | 2.3 |
| 21 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| All 16 to 21-year-olds | 3.8 | 3.8 |
Sources:
| ||
| LSC Individualised Learner Record | ||
| LSC Individualised Student Record | ||
| Office for National Statistics | ||
The proportions of 16 to 21-year-olds to have achieved either an NVQ level 3 qualification in LSC funded further education, or the NVQ component of an apprenticeship are shown in the following table.
Achievements by 16 to 21-year-olds of NVQ level 3 courses in LSC funded further education and of NVQ components of apprenticeships as a proportion of the relevant age cohort by programme and age—England: 2001/02 and 2002/03
| ||
Percentage
| ||
Programme/Age at 31 August
| 2001/02
| 2002/03 3
|
NVQ 3 in LSC funded FE
| ||
| 16 | — | n/a |
| 17 | 0.3 | n/a |
| 18 | 0.3 | n/a |
| 19 | 0.2 | n/a |
| 20 | 0.1 | n/a |
| 21 | 0.1 | n/a |
| All 16 to 21-year-olds | 0.2 | n/a |
NVQ 3 component of an advanced apprenticeship 1
| ||
| 16 | — | — |
| 17 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 18 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| 19 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 20 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| 21 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| All 16 to 21-year-olds | 0.5 | 0.5 |
NVQ 2 component of an apprenticeship 2
| ||
| 16 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 17 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| 18 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| 19 | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| 20 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| 21 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| All 16 to 21-year-olds | 0.7 | 0.9 |
NVQ component of all apprenticeships
| ||
| 16 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 17 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| 18 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| 19 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| 20 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 21 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| All 16 to 21-year-olds | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| '—' = less than 0.05 percent. | ||
Notes to tables:
| ||
1 Advanced apprenticeships were until recently known as advanced modern apprenticeships. | ||
2 Apprenticeships were until recently known as foundation modern apprenticeships. | ||
3 2002/03 outcomes data for LSC funded further education are not yet available. 2002/03 outcomes data for apprenticeships are provisional. | ||
Sources:
| ||
| LSC Individualised Learner Record | ||
| LSC Individualised Student Record | ||
| Office for National Statistics |
Please note that direct comparisons should not be made between the proportions in the two tables as individual learners will have their programmes of learning delivered over different years. For example, some of the 17-year-olds to have commenced an NVQ 3 course in 2001/02 will finish as 17-year-olds in 2001/02, others will finish in 2002/03 as 18-year-olds, while others will finish the year after as 19-year-olds.
The percentages in both these tables are produced using post-census population estimates. However we are currently unable to provide a historical series on a comparable population basis. Further information can be found in the Department's Statistical First Release, "Participation in Education, Training and Employment by 16–18 Year Olds in England: 2001 and 2002" available online at: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000426/index.shtml.
Watford Grammar School For Boys
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of students at Watford Grammar School for Boys are selected by aptitude or ability. [175426]
This information is not collected centrally by the Department.
International Development
Iraq
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development pursuant to the answer of 9 December 2003, Official Report, column 422W, on Iraq, whether the complete review of missing drugs and supplies has finished; what the findings were; whether new drug supply systems are now fully operational; whether supply accounting and reporting systems are in place; what the new national drug formulary comprises; whether shortages of medicine in Iraq are continuing; when he expects full medical supplies will get through to the Iraqi people; and if he will make a statement. [173385]
The World Health Organisation (WHO) recently presented a report to the Iraqi Ministry of Health (IMOH) assessing the national drug and supply system, which is currently being considered. In parallel, the IMOH have also been provided with essential drug policy and quality guidance and support to the assessment of the national drug regulations and registration systems. Plans for strengthening the IMOH National Drug Regulatory Authority have been agreed and guidelines for good storage practices are being prepared. Additional strategies for upgrading the Drug Information Centre have been finalised and procurement of equipment is underway. A new National Formulary, comprising over 1,000 medicines has been produced and is available from the IMOH.New procurement and distribution management teams have been set up by the IMOH, replacing the previous system under the corrupt, state-owned Kimadia Company. Procurement of essential medical supplies has been initiated and a delivery is expected in the next few days. Further shipments, including critical medical supplies for the Governorates, are on order.Significant progress has been made to improve national drugs supplies and systems: The WHO report that stocks of 23 drugs for chronic diseases out of the 32 commonly used, are in sufficient supply to meet patient demand. The IMOH, WHO and the CPA continue to work to further improve both drug supplies and systems in Iraq.
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what aid and assistance his Department is giving to the Iraqi people. [173932]
DFID has committed over £278 million for humanitarian and reconstruction assistance to Iraq since March 2003, of which £70 million has been channelled through the International Reconstruction Fund Facility for Iraq (IRFFI). DFID has also provided a number of staff, filling a range of posts, to the Iraqi ministries and the Coalition Provincial Authority (CPA).On 19 February, I published DFID's plans to contribute to the reconstruction of Iraq over the next two years in our interim Country Assistance Plan. It has been placed in the House of Commons Library and can be found on the DFID website: www.dfid.gov.uk
Liberia
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what assistance his Department has (a) pledged and (b) delivered to assist Liberian refugees to (i) return to and (ii) re-integrate into society in Liberia; and if he will make a statement. [175475]
DFID's relief and reconstruction strategy for Liberia, in 2003 and 2004, has concentrated on helping to relieve the humanitarian crisis, provide security, and restore basic services so that both refugees and internally displaced persons can return to their places of origin. Over this period, DFID has committed a total of £10.6 million for these purposes and has so far disbursed £3.6 million for humanitarian programmes, £0.4 million in support of the UN security coordination agency and interim care centres for children, and £2.7 million for rehabilitation of basic services. For 2004, DFID is discussing with various agencies proposals totalling £1.7 million for humanitarian support, and £2.2 million for reactivation of health care, water supplies, and agricultural livelihoods.In addition, DFID has pledged a total of £6 million to support Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration programmes over 2003–05, of which we have so far disbursed £1 million. These funds are intended to assist the re-integration into their communities of ex-combatants and others affected by war.
Staff With Disabilities
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development for what reasons the Service Delivery Agreement target to have 3.3 per cent. of senior Civil Service posts filled with staff with disabilities has not been met. [174140]
DFID is an equal opportunities employer. We value diversity. DFID's policy on recruitment is to stimulate and encourage applications from all sections of the community specifically including candidates with disabilities. We word our advertisements accordingly. Final selection, however, is on merit, and the composition of the Senior Civil Service group is a reflection of appointments made on this basis, through open competition or internal promotion.There are currently 79 members of the Senior Civil Service in DFID, so performance against the target is very sensitive to small changes in the actual number of staff with disabilities in post.In general, DFID is aware that there are more disabled people in the Department than declare their impairment and is actively pursuing a number of measures to develop a more open culture on disability. However, it will remain the individual's choice to define themselves as disabled or not.
Work And Pensions
Child Maintenance
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many British citizens avoid paying child maintenance because they have left the country; and how many of these reside in the EU. [166728]
The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive, Mr. Doug Smith. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.
Letter from Doug Smith to Mr. Barry Sheerman, dated 21 May 2004:
In replying to your recent Parliamentary question about the Child Support Agency the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Chief Executive.
You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many British citizens avoid paying child maintenance because they have left the country; and how many of these reside in the EU.
I do not have the information you seek. I can however say at 30 November 2003 there were around 300 cases where further action was suspended because the non-resident parent was living abroad. I am unable to determine how many of those cases reside in the EU.
Child Support
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions when the new Child Support Agency formula will be applied to all absent parents, irrespective of the date of claim; and if he will make a statement. [170823]
I refer the hon. Member to the written answer I gave him on 18 December 2003, Official Report, column 1092W.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to his Written Statement of 21 April, Official Report, columns 19–21WS on child support, for what reasons some new cases were unable to be progressed on the new system. [171098]
The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive, Mr. Doug Smith. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.
Letter from Doug Smith to Mr. Steve Webb, dated 21 May 2004:
In reply to your recent Parliamentary question about the Child Support Agency the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Chief Executive.
You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to his Written Statement of 21st April, Official Report, columns 19–21WS on child support, for what reasons some new cases were unable to be progressed on the new system.
Some cases were unable to be progressed on the new system because of problems within the computer service provided to the Child Support Agency by EDS. The Agency is working closely with EDS to remedy those problems and as it does so it will become possible to progress those cases.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to his Written Statement of 21 April 2004, Official Report, columns 19–21WS on the child support scheme, when he estimates that reliable figures on (a) compliance and (b) throughput will be available. [171099]
The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive, Mr. Doug Smith. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.
Letter from Doug Smith to Mr. Steve Webb, dated 21 May 2004:
In reply to your recent Parliamentary questions about the Child Support Agency the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Chief Executive.
You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to his Written Statement of 21st April, Official Report, columns 19–21WS on the child support scheme, when he estimates that reliable figures on (a) compliance and (b) throughput will be available.
Whilst EDS have made significant progress in relation to correcting defects within their computer service we are still working through with them how these can be applied retrospectively to provide the type of information you seek. We do not yet have detailed plans for this work and I am therefore unable to provide the estimate requested.
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to his written statement of 21 April 2004, Official Report, columns 19–21WS, for what reasons his Department has increased the amount retained from the monthly payments to EDS from 15 per cent. to 15 to 20 per cent. [171288]
The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive, Mr. Doug Smith. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.
Letter from Doug Smith to Mr. Steve Webb, dated 21 May 2004:
In reply to your recent Parliamentary questions about the Child Support Agency the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Chief Executive.
You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to his Written Statement of 21st April, Official Report, columns 19–21WS, for what reasons his Department has increased the amount retained from the monthly payments to EDS from 15 per cent, to 15 to 20 per cent.
In the last quarter the Department has retained between 15% and 20% of the monies that would otherwise be due to EDS. The amount of the retention actually made each month reflects the service levels achieved by EDS in the provision of their contracted service to the Agency.
Child Support Agency
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to his Oral Statement of 11 February 2004 to the Work and Pensions Select Committee on the Child Support Agency reforms, when the IT recovery programme (a) began and (b) will be completed; and if he will make a statement. [169399]
The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive, Mr. Doug Smith. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.
Letter from Doug Smith to Mr. Steve Webb, dated 21 May 2004:
In reply to your recent Parliamentary questions about the Child Support Agency the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Chief Executive.
You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to his Oral Statement of 11th February, to the Work and Pensions Select Committee on the Child Support Agency reforms, when the IT recovery programme (a) began and (b) will be completed; and if he will make a statement.
Since November 2003 we have been involved with EDS to agree the scope, design and development schedule for their programme to remedy issues associated with their provision of a computer service to support the Child Support Reform programme. This has led to enhancements to the main system in January and March and to the work management and telephony system (again in January and March). They have currently planned a further major software release in June. We are still discussing the final content and delivery timetable of subsequent enhancements.
Cabinet Office
Obesity Initiative
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office for what reason the Government discounts to private health club membership for firemen, nurses, police and ambulance workers as part of its initiative to cut obesity have not been extended to all categories of Civil Servants. [173321]
The Government are committed to looking after the occupational health of Civil Servants. Having pro-active occupational health policies not only benefits employees but can also assist the organisation by helping to reduce levels of sickness absence.As part of programmes to raise awareness of health issues, Government Departments and agencies are free to negotiate membership discounts on behalf of their staff with private health club providers, or provide their own fitness facilities.
Defence
Aircraft Carrier Programme
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the progress of the new aircraft carrier programme. [173703]
The Future Carrier (CVF) programme remains in the Assessment Phase. Ministers are currently considering proposals on the overall CVF programme, the alliance strategy and on when to proceed to the Demonstration and Manufacture phases. We expect to make an announcement when these deliberations are complete.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when he expects to make an announcement concerning the Future Carrier Programme, the Alliance Strategy and the timetable for the demonstration and manufacture phases; and if he will make a statement. [173704]
Ministers are currently considering proposals on the overall CVF programme, the alliance strategy and on when to proceed to the Demonstration and Manufacture phases. We expect to make an announcement when these deliberations are complete.
Awe Aldermaston
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether his Department's policy in respect of the proposal to build a high-powered laser facility at AWE Aldermaston has changed since 5 July 1999. [173861]Mr. Ingram: The Ministry of Defence is currently considering a new proposal for a laser facility at AWE to replace the existing HELEN laser. In 2001, because of time and cost overruns on the United States National Ignition Facility, it was decided not to continue with plans, announced on 5 July 1999,
Official Report, column 341W, to build a United Kingdom target chamber attached to that facility.
Eurofighter
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will promote the benefit of Eurofighter to the Singapore Government. [173771]
This Government are actively involved in promoting Eurofighter Typhoon to the Government of Singapore through the work of the Defence Export Services Organisation. The aircraft has been included on the shortlist to be evaluated for the Singaporean next Fighter Replacement Programme, and a decision is expected early in 2005.
International Committee Of The Red Cross
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether, when the administration of Camp Bucca was handed back to the British Armed Forces, they began to investigate the allegations of ill-treatment detailed to the International Committee of the Red Cross by detainees. [173455]
No. The United Kingdom took over the running of Camp Bucca from the United States on 25 September 2003, and continued to run the facility until the opening of the Divisional Temporary Detention Facility at Shaibah on 15 December 2003.The two incidents concerning prisoners at Camp Bucca, detailed in the ICRC's report on the Treatment by the Coalition Forces of Prisoners of War and other Protected Persons by the Geneva Conventions in Iraq during Arrest, internment and Interrogations, both allegedly occurred while the facility was run by the US. These are matters for the US.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the death mentioned at paragraph 44 of the International Committee of the Red Cross Report on the Treatment by the Coalition Forces of Prisoners of War and other protected persons in Iraq said to have occurred on 22 September 2003 was the result of actions by British armed forces. [173020]
[holding answer 13 May 2004]: The United Kingdom took over the running of Camp Bucca from the United States on 25 September 2003. The incident referred to in Paragraph 45 of the ICRC Report on the Treatment by the Coalition Forces of Prisoners of War and other Protected Persons by the Geneva Conventions in Iraq during Arrest, Internment and Interrogations, occurred before the UK took over the facility, therefore was not the result of action by British Armed Forces.
Investigation Techniques
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assistance has been provided by the British Special Air Services to the United States military forces in investigation techniques of military personnel since 1984. [175139]
I am withholding details under Exemption 1 of the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information.
It Outsourcing
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what the schedule is for the plan to outsource IT support and provision across his Department; [168293](2) what the projected budget is for the
(a) outsourced support and provision of IT services for his Department and (b) cost of terminating existing contracts; [168291]
(3) what weighting will be given to the previous track records in other areas of the civil and public sector of the consortia that are bidding for the support and provision of IT services in his Department; [168290]
(4) what his contingency plan is for the possibility that an outside contractor wins the contract for the support and provision of IT in his Department and then fails during the term of that contract. [168289]
These questions have been answered with respect to the Defence Information Infrastructure (DII) programme. The Ministry of Defence is in negotiations with two potential commercial Delivery Partners (DP) for the provision of Information Systems services. The DII programme is currently in the Assessment Phase of the Smart Procurement cycle.In terms of cost, the MOD currently spends over £450 million per annum on its information infrastructure. It is anticipated that the DII Public/Private Partnership contract will cost in the region of £4 billion over 10 years.Track record is one of a number of factors included in the evaluation of bids. The Department's Supplier Relations Group has conducted research of bidding consortium members' performance both in Defence and across Government. In addition, the project has taken up references, by telephone and through visits, from existing customers of the key companies in the bidding consortia. Further reference visits will be conducted during the final phase of the procurement, targeting customers in receipt of a similar volume and range of services.10 major legacy contracts for IT infrastructure have been identified and these will be subsumed within, or superseded by, the DII contract. The majority of these contracts are due to expire naturally over the next 18 months. An options appraisal has been conducted for each contract and an appropriate scenario agreed for each during subsequent mitigation planning. Where the risks, liabilities or known termination charges are unacceptably high, the preferred option is to allow a contract to run to expiry and then assimilate the activity within DII. Any contracts that currently lie beyond the next three years, which in the main are PFI contracts, will be subsumed on expiry. Residual liabilities will be assessed more fully following negotiations with bidders in the later stages of procurement but generally we would expect to be in no worse a position than now and would seek to be in a better position through negotiation.Support to deployed operations will continue to be supplied by Service personnel. For all other elements of IT infrastructure provision and support the MOD will mitigate the risk of supplier failure by contracting with a consortium which will provide the services through a range of service providers. This will ensure that in the event that one member of the consortium fails, there is capacity available for another consortium member to pick up the service provision. In addition, the MOD will retain rights to step in and use its own staff or other third party contractors to remedy major service failures. Ultimately, the MOD will have rights to terminate the contract for material breaches in performance, with options to take services back in-house or contract with another commercial provider for their delivery.
King's Regiment
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the postings were of the lst Battalion, The King's Regiment for the last two years; and what postings are planned in the next year. [174740]
1st Battalion, The King's Regiment has been based at Catterick since March 2001. The Regiment deployed to Iraq from June to October 2003. One Company has since deployed to Kosovo, where they remain. During the period the unit has exercised in Canada (in the summer of 2002) and was involved in Operation Fresco (towards the end of 2002 and the start of 2003).It is currently planned that a Company from the unit will deploy to the Falkland Islands later this year. The remainder of the unit is scheduled to undertake a number of routine tasks in support of the training of other units.
Missiles
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what armaments are to be fitted to the Future Surface Combatant. [171862]
The Future Surface Combatant is currently in its concept stage. As such, no decisions have yet been taken on specific armaments. However, it is envisaged that its roles will include Anti-Surface Warfare, Anti-Submarine Warfare, Anti-Air Warfare and Land Attack, and the ships will be equipped accordingly.
Overseas Bribery
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many allegations of overseas bribery involving UK companies his Department has received from the US Administration since February 1999; on what dates these allegations were received; and what action his Department took on each allegation. [151401]
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to him by my right hon. Friend the Minister for Europe on 3 February 2004, Official Report, column 844W.
Procurement
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will place in the Library a copy of the long-term costings for the equipment programme. [172741]
The detailed financial data and planning assumptions about the proposed content and timing of the future equipment programme form part of internal advice to Ministers on the overall affordability of the defence programme and of individual projects at the time they come forward for approval. This information therefore anticipates decisions still to be taken by Ministers. In parts it also contains information which is commercially sensitive. I am therefore withholding such information under Exemptions 2 and 13 of the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information.Information is, however, routinely made available on a range of major equipment projects, which together form the substantial part of the Department's forward equipment programme, for example in support of the PAC's annual Major Projects Report and the HCDC's annual inquiry into defence procurement. This detail is set in broader context by the publication every two years of the Department's overarching Defence Investment Strategy.
Refuelling Tanker Aircraft
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the Government plan to work jointly with the French Government in the CVF programme; and if he will make a statement. [170352]
We are continuing to explore opportunities with the French for potential Carrier co-operation. We believe there could be potential political, military and economic benefits to be gained through such co-operation, but we must ensure that the United Kingdom's CVF programme is not disrupted.
Type 45 Destroyer
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on progress on the Type 45 destroyer programme. [174251]
The Type 45 will be the biggest and most capable class of air defence destroyers ever built for the Royal Navy, and will be equipped to carry out a range of tasks. Six ships are on order with the prime contractor BAE Systems, providing stability for the shipbuilding work force on the Clyde, and at the new VT facility at Portsmouth, for the remainder of the decade. The programme is in full production against a mature design, a first for a UK warship project at this stage of its development.
Un Operations
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will place in the Library transcripts of the media interviews he gave on 10 May 2004 on the situation in Iraq and investigations into alleged abuse of detainees in British custody in Iraq. [173344]
The Ministry of Defence does not routinely hold full transcripts of interviews given by Ministers on radio or television programmes.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many vehicles have been transported to Iraq for use by British armed forces, broken down by type. [173860]
This information would require extensive manual retrieval and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what length of deployment UK military personnel are required to serve in Iraq. [174353]
I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave on 19 April 2004, Official Refort, column 11W, to the hon. Member for Romford (Mi. Rosindell).
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many of each of the (a) B1u-97B, (b) 20 mm Phalanx Sea-to-Air, (c) 25 mm M791, (d) 30 mm PGU-14/B, (e) 120 mm MV Charm, (f) Tow 2 A/B A/tank, (g) AGM-65 G Maverick, (h) Hellfire II/Brimstone, (i) AGM-84 SLAM-ER, (j) AGM-154C JSOW, (k) AGM-158 JASSM, (l) BGM-109 Tactical Tomahawk, (m) Storm Shadow/Scalper, (n) GBU-15, (o) GBU-24, (p) GBU-27, (q) GBU-28B/B, (r) GBU-31JDAM, (s) GBU-37 B/B, (t) GBU-118/B and (u) SSB weapon types were used in Iraq; and which were used against targets in urban areas. [174375]
The numbers of each weapon type used by British forces during Op. Telic are as follows:
| Weapon type | Total used |
| 20 mm Phalanx | 0 |
| 120 mm CHARM | 850 |
| TOW (I and FI variants) | 83 |
| AGM-65 G Maverick | 38 |
| Storm Shadow | 27 |
| GBU-27 | 9 |
(l) BGM-109 Tactical Tomahawk, and; in relation to the breakdown of numbers used against urban targets, I am withholding this information in accordance with Exemption la of the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information which relates to defence, security and international relations.
With the exception of the Tactical Tomahawk, those weapon types included in the question but not listed in the table above are not in UK service.
Vaccination
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) when the practice of informed consent for the administering of vaccines became standard practice; [174191](2) pursuant to the letter from the Under-Secretary of State of 1 December 2003, under what guidelines vaccines were administered that did not have a product licence at that time. [174197]
We are currently assembling the information but it is taking time. I will therefore write to the hon. Member and place a copy of my letter in the Library of the House.
Health
Chronic Disease
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what expenditure has been allocated by his Department to projects to improve chronic disease management over the next three years. [171233]
The management of chronic conditions and the provision of treatment and support to people with such conditions consume substantial national health service resources within primary care trusts' existing allocations. Our recently announced initiative, improving chronic disease management, is intended to make better use of those resources and offer better care to people with chronic conditions. The Department of Health has, however, allocated a total of £5 million in funding to nine primary care trusts participating in the Evercare pilot scheme to test potential ways in which these improvements might be achieved.
Clinical Advisers (It Forum)
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the reasons are for the disbandment of the NHS IT forum for clinicians; and if he will make a statement. [173093]
The national health service's national programme for information technology is currently considering options to strengthen the arrangements for providing advice from clinicians and patients' representatives to inform its work. Members of the National Clinical Advisory Board are fully involved in discussions about its future role. The National Clinical Advisory Board has not been disbanded.
Dental Treatment
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many dentists working within the London borough of Wandsworth provide national health service dental treatment within their practice; and if he will make a statement. [173077]
Data for number of dentists are not collected by London borough area. The number of national health service dentists in Wandsworth Primary Care Trust (PCT) at 30 September 2003 is shown in the table.
| National health service: Number of dentists in Wandsworth PCT area—30 September 2003 | |
| Primary care trust | Wandsworth PCT |
| General dental service (GDS) | 121 |
| Community dental service (CDS) | 27 |
| Salaried | 4 |
| Total | 152 |
| Adult dental registrations as a percentage of the population at 30 September for each year | |||||||
| 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |
| Wigan and Bolton HA | 159.6 | 54.0 | 52.0 | 51.4 | 51.0 | n/a | n/a |
| Bolton PCT | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 45.6 | 45.7 |
| Greater Manchester SHA area | 160.3 | 53.9 | 52.2 | 52.3 | 51.9 | 50.6 | 49.7 |
| England | 51.0 | 43.8 | 43.3 | 43.4 | 43.4 | 44.2 | 44.0 |
| n/a = not available. | |||||||
| 1 Registration figures are not on the same basis as those for later years because of the change in registration period. | |||||||
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many dentists in (a) Bolton, (b) Greater Manchester and (c) England treated NHS patients in the past seven years; and how many treated only private patients in each year. [172621]
Dentists in the GDS include principals, assistants and vocational dental practitioners. These figures are on a headcount basis rather than whole-time equivalent basis and therefore take no account of part-time working.
Dentists
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what proportion of adults in (a) Bolton, (b) Greater Manchester and (c) England were registered with an NHS dentist in each of the last seven years. [172598]
The information available is for general dental service (GDS) dentist registration rates for adults in the Wigan and Bolton Health Authority at 30 September 1997 to 2001, and for Bolton Primary Care Trust (PCT), which is part of the Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority (SHA) for 30 September 2002 and 30 September 2003. Figures for the Greater Manchester SHA area are also shown.Registrations cover patients who have been to a general dental service dentist within the past 15 months. These will exclude patients who choose to attend occasionally who have not been to a dentist during that period. Registrations are included in the area of the dentist. Patients may choose to have their dental services in a different PCT area from the one in which they live. The registration period was changed for new registrations and registrations extending from September 1996. Previously the period for adults was 24 months while children's registration lapsed at the end of the following calendar year. This caused registration numbers to fall between November 1997 and August 1998.National health service dental services are also provided by the community dental service, personal dental service, the salaried service of the GDS and hospital dental service. These services do not require the patient to be registered with a dentist before treatment.
The table shows the number of dentists in the general, personal, community, and hospital dental services.The figures given are for 30 September for each year. Before 2002 Bolton was part of the Wigan and Bolton Health Authority. In 2002 health authorities (HAs) were replaced by primary care trusts (PCTs).Figures for the number of dentists who treat private patients only are not available. Few dentists are purely private. The Office of Fair Trading report "The private dentistry market" in the UK stated that only 210 practices are totally private in the United Kingdom out of 11,000 practices in total.Figures are also given for England.
Number of dentists at 30 September of each year
| |||||||
1997
| 1998
| 1999
| 2000
| 2001
| 2002
| 2003
| |
| Wigan and Bolton HA | 205 | 210 | 211 | 219 | 207 | n/a | n/a |
| Bolton PCT | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 85 | 84 |
| Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority area | 1,115 | 1,127 | 1,162 | 1,155 | 1,150 | 1,161 | 1,203 |
| England | 20,483 | 21,041 | 21,556 | 21,902 | 22,438 | 23,051 | 23,490 |
| n/a = not available | |||||||
Dialysis
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list the (a) average and (b) maximum waiting time for vascular access surgery for dialysis patients for (i) England, (ii) each region and (iii) each strategic health authority in each year since 1996. [159780]
Information on waiting times for vascular access surgery is not centrally available. Waiting times for consultant led in-patient elective admissions and consultant led first out-patient appointments following general practitioner referral are collected on the consultant's main specialty not by procedure.
Diets
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what evaluation he has made of studies into long-term calorific restriction diets and their effectiveness in reducing the risk of (a) cancer, (b) coronary heart disease, (c) diabetes and (d) strokes. [169236]
The Department has not specifically evaluated the long-term effects of calorie restricted diets, but animal research has consistently shown that calorie restriction can increase lifespan by about 30 per cent. and protect against cancer. The longterm effect of calorie restriction in humans has yet to be established.Obesity increases the risk of developing coronary heart disease, diabetes, some cancers and hypertension. Evidence indicates that maintaining a healthy weight is a key element in the prevention of these conditions.
Food Standards Agency
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) Parliamentary Questions, (b) adjournment debates and (c) urgent Questions on the work of the Food Standards Agency (FSA) the Department has answered since it was established; and if he will make a statement on the accountability of the FSA to Parliament. [171860]
[holding answer 11 May 2004]: Ministers have answered 1,281 Parliamentary Questions, two adjournment debates and no urgent questions on the work of the Food Standards Agency (FSA) since it was established. There has been one Opposition Day debate, eight European Scrutiny Debates in European Standing Committee C, one debate on a prayer against a Statutory Instrument in the House of Commons and one in the House of Lords, seven Select Committees where both oral and written evidence was provided and six Select Committees where written memoranda only were provided. FSA policy areas have not been debated in Westminster Hall. Health Ministers have not taken Primary Legislation through Parliament on behalf of FSA.The FSA is a United Kingdom non-Ministerial department established by the Food Standards Act 1999. It is accountable to the Westminster Parliament through the Secretary of State for Health and to the administrations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland through the relevant Health Ministers. Under the 1999 Act, the FSA's expenditure is paid out of money provided by Parliament and the administrations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Its Annual Report and Accounts is laid before the Westminster Parliament, the Scottish Parliament, the National Assembly for Wales and the Northern Ireland Assembly. Its Chief Executive is the FSA Principal Accounting Officer.Correspondence to Health Ministers from hon. and right hon. Members about issues for which the FSA is responsible normally receives a reply from the relevant Minister. The Chairman and Chief Executive of FSA reply to correspondence addressed directly to them.The Meat Hygiene Service (MHS) is an executive agency of the FSA. It is responsible for enforcement of meat hygiene and BSE-related legislation in licensed meat plants in Great Britain. It also carries out certain functions on behalf of the Environment and Rural Affairs Departments.
Health Service
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many and what percentage of women in Bootle with suspected breast cancer saw a specialist within two weeks in each of the last five years. [171481]
The information requested is not collected on a constituency basis. The information in the table relates to national health service organisations serving the Bootle constituency.
Waiting times for patients referred urgently by their GP with suspected breast cancer Crosby to 1st outpatient appointment: NHS Trusts in Crosby
| |||||
Quarter
| NHS Trust
| Percentage of patients seen in two weeks
| Total patients seen
| Patients seen in two weeks
| |
| 1999–2000 | 1 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 76.2 | 101 | 77 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 80.4 | 97 | 78 | ||
| 1999–2000 | 2 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 88.2 | 102 | 90 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 166 | 166 | ||
| 1999–2000 | 3 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 95.0 | 120 | 114 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 99.5 | 210 | 209 | ||
| 1999–2000 | 4 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 118 | 118 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 99.5 | 209 | 208 | ||
| 2000–01 | 1 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 98.0 | 102 | 100 |
| Royal Liverpool Children's NHS Trust | 92.6 | 190 | 176 | ||
| 2000–01 | 2 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 155 | 155 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 295 | 295 | ||
| 2000–01 | 3 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 155 | 155 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 270 | 270 | ||
| 2000–01 | 4 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 143 | 143 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 96.8 | 250 | 242 | ||
| 2001–02 | 1 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 99.4 | 157 | 156 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 98.2 | 276 | 271 | ||
| 2001–02 | 2 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 175 | 175 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 92.2 | 258 | 238 | ||
| 2001–02 | 3 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 225 | 225 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 84.7 | 320 | 271 | ||
| 2001–02 | 4 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 198 | 198 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 98.4 | 319 | 314 | ||
| 2002–03 | 1 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 234 | 234 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 99.0 | 307 | 304 | ||
| 2002–03 | 2 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 99.1 | 223 | 221 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 99.6 | 272 | 271 | ||
| 2002–03 | 3 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 99.6 | 255 | 254 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 96.7 | 391 | 378 | ||
| 2002–03 | 4 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 229 | 229 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 98.9 | 285 | 282 | ||
| 2003–04 | 1 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 221 | 221 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 99.4 | 320 | 318 | ||
Waiting times for patients referred urgently by their GP with suspected breast cancer to 1st outpatient appointment: NHS Trusts in Crosby
| |||||
Quarter
| NHS Trust
| Percentage of patients seen in two weeks
| Total patients seen
| Patients seen in two weeks
| |
| 2003–04 | 2 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 265 | 265 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 99.7 | 373 | 372 | ||
| 2003–04 | 3 | Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 271 | 271 |
| Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust | 100.0 | 374 | 374 | ||
| Source: | |||||
| DH form QMCW. | |||||
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will make a statement on the levels of elective admission to the NHS in South Ribble in the past five years. [171269]
The information requested is shown in the table.
| Count of in-year elective (waiting time, booked, planned) admissions—PCT of responsibility5F5 Chorley and South Ribble Primary Care Trust—NHS Hospitals, England 1998–99 to 2002–03. Excluding regular attenders. | |
| PCT of responsibility | 5F2 Chorley and South Ribble |
| 1998–99 | 30,440 |
| 1999–2000 | 32,827 |
| 2000–01 | 34,386 |
| 2001–02 | 24,687 |
| 2002–03 | 32,671 |
| Notes: | |
| 1. An in-year admission is the first period of in-patient care under one consultant within one health care provider, excluding admissions beginning before 1 April at the start of the data year. Periods of care on-going at the end of the data year (unfinished admission episodes) are included. Please note that admissions do not represent the number of in-patients as a person may have more than one admission within the year. | |
| 2. Figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data (i.e. the data are ungrossed). | |
| 3. PCT and strategic health authority (SHA) data was added to historic data-years in the HES database using 2002–03 boundaries, as a one-off exercise in 2004. The quality of the data on PCT of Treatment and SHA of Treatment is poor in 1996–97, 1997–98 and 1998–99, with over a third of all finished episodes having missing values in these years. Data quality of PCT of general practitioner practice and SHA of GP practice in 1997–98 and 1998–99 is also poor, with a high proportion missing values where practices changed or ceased to exist. There is less change in completeness of the residence-based fields over time, where the majority of unknown values are due to missing postcodes on birth episodes. Users of time series analysis including these years need to be aware of these issues in their interpretation of the data. | |
| Source: | |
| Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), Department of Health. | |
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many rapid access chest pain clinics there are in Workington constituency. [170713]
There are no rapid access chest pain clinics based in Workington. However, there is a clinic in Whitehaven.
Health Tourism
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment his Department has made of the scale of health tourism; and if he will make a statement. [160665]
The national health service has never been required to provide statistics on the number of overseas visitors treated under the provisions of the National Health Service (Charges to Overseas Visitors) Regulations 1989. It is therefore not possible to give a definitive assessment of the scale of this matter. Nevertheless, NHS staff operating the charging regime have told us that there are significant issues in some areas, which we are taking action to deal with. We are taking forward a study of 12 NHS trusts across England, the results of which will, over time, help to give us a better understanding of the level of inappropriate use of the NHS by overseas visitors.In addition, on 14 May I launched a public consultation on proposals to exclude overseas visitors from eligibility for free NHS primary medical services. We are also commissioning a study of the use of these services by overseas visitors which will inform our consideration of the responses to the consultation.
Heart Bypass Operations
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many heart bypass operations there were per million population in (a) England and (b) each strategic health authority in each year since 1997. [172700]
The information requested is shown in the table.Heart bypass operations have increased in number over the past six years. However, angioplasty is increasingly being used to treat patients who would have undergone bypass surgery in the past and the procedures performed in national health service hospitals in England have increased from 17,291 in 1997–98 to 34,986 in 2002–03.
All operations (ICD–10 K40–K46) Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABGs). Count of Finished Consultant Episodes by Strategic Health Authority (SHA) of Residence. NHS Hospitals, England 1997–98 to 2002–03
| |||||||
SHA of Residence
| 1997–98
| 1998–99
| 1999–2000
| 2000–01
| 2001–02
| 2002–03
| |
| Q01 | Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire HA | 976 | 1,148 | 1,111 | 1,015 | 1,040 | 1,134 |
| Q02 | Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire HA | 928 | 728 | 624 | 721 | 849 | 728 |
| Q03 | Essex HA | 475 | 600 | 552 | 752 | 580 | 638 |
| Q04 | North West London HA | 940 | 921 | 852 | 929 | 824 | 852 |
| Q05 | North Central London HA | 397 | 415 | 410 | 357 | 417 | 405 |
| Q06 | North East London HA | 496 | 575 | 528 | 698 | 616 | 591 |
| Q07 | South East London HA | 586 | 620 | 506 | 460 | 500 | 517 |
| Q08 | South West London HA | 447 | 446 | 476 | 501 | 593 | 566 |
| Q09 | Northumberland, Tyne and Wear HA | 844 | 867 | 825 | 837 | 912 | 772 |
| Q10 | County Durham and Tees Valley HA | 842 | 875 | 732 | 751 | 650 | 772 |
| Q11 | North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire HA | 417 | 874 | 868 | 878 | 844 | 1,070 |
| Q12 | West Yorkshire HA | 975 | 1,108 | 916 | 977 | 1,097 | 998 |
| Q13 | Cumbria and Lancashire HA | 1,137 | 1,158 | 1,045 | 1,179 | 1,232 | 1,437 |
| Q14 | Greater Manchester HA | 1,050 | 1,160 | 1,185 | 1,301 | 1,395 | 1,515 |
| Q15 | Cheshire and Merseyside HA | 996 | 1,018 | 1,084 | 1,104 | 1,137 | 1,421 |
| Q16 | Thames Valley HA | 641 | 801 | 819 | 793 | 916 | 931 |
| Q17 | Hampshire and Isle of Wight HA | 623 | 752 | 749 | 947 | 852 | 769 |
| Q18 | Kent and Medway HA | 702 | 738 | 702 | 674 | 739 | 707 |
| Q19 | Surrey and Sussex HA | 1,057 | 974 | 1,211 | 1,194 | 1,191 | 1,141 |
| Q20 | Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire HA | 829 | 1,012 | 1,117 | 1,048 | 1,073 | 940 |
| Q21 | South West Peninsula HA | 660 | 795 | 941 | 987 | 1,061 | 918 |
| Q22 | Dorset and Somerset HA | 586 | 656 | 592 | 568 | 502 | 494 |
| Q23 | South Yorkshire HA | 518 | 523 | 630 | 632 | 639 | 769 |
| Q24 | Trent HA | 652 | 1,044 | 1,039 | 1,088 | 1,025 | 1,124 |
| Q25 | Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland HA | 626 | 690 | 625 | 560 | 615 | 588 |
| Q26 | Shropshire and Staffordshire HA | 585 | 633 | 645 | 801 | 736 | 825 |
| Q27 | Birmingham and The Black Country HA | 1,153 | 1,095 | 1,030 | 1,132 | 983 | 1,226 |
| Q28 | Coventry, Warwickshire, Herefordshire and Worcestershire HA | 669 | 717 | 682 | 716 | 643 | 686 |
| U | England Not Otherwise Specified | — | 2 | — | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| England | 20,807 | 22,945 | 22,496 | 23,604 | 23,663 | 24,540 | |
Notes:
| |||||||
| 1. A finished admission episode is the first period of in-patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. Please note that admissions do not represent the number of in-patients, as a person may have more than one admission within the year. | |||||||
| 2. Figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data (ie the data are ungrossed). | |||||||
| 3. All operations count of episodes—these figures represent a count of all FCE's where the procedure was mentioned in any of the 12 (four prior to 2002–03) operation fields in a HES record. A record is only included once in each count, even if an operation is mentioned in more than one operation field of the record. Population figures are not available so only operation counts can be provided. | |||||||
| 4. Strategic Health Authority (SHA) Data Quality—SHA data were added to historic data-years in the HES database using 2002–03 boundaries, as a one-off exercise in 2004. The quality of the data on SHA of treatment is poor in 1998–99, with over a third of all finished episodes having missing values in these years. Users of time series analysis including 1998–99 need to be aware of these issues in their interpretation of the data. | |||||||
Source:
| |||||||
| Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), Department of Health. | |||||||
Hepatitis C
To ask the Secretary of State for Health when he expects to finalise compensation arrangements for those who contracted hepatitis C from blood transfusions. [173232]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will make a further statement on the payment of compensation to patients who were infected with hepatitis C as a result of NHS treatment. [173377]
Work is progressing to finalise the arrangements, to begin making ex-gratia payments. The company that will disburse payments, the Skipton Fund, was incorporated on 25 March. The four United Kingdom health departments expect the Skipton Fund to be operational shortly.
Medical Negligence
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what code of practice is in place to prevent conflicts of interest concerning solicitors whose practices undertake medical negligence cases who are a (a) board member and (b) chairman of a health trust. [173308]
The codes of conduct and code accountability for national health service boards require that all board members should declare any conflict of interest that arises in the course of conducting NHS business. The codes also requires that board members should declare any business interests in the field of health and social care which should be formally recorded in the minutes of the board and entered into a register which is available to the public. When a conflict of interest is established, the board member involved is also required to withdraw from any related board discussion and not play any part in the relevant discussion or decision All NHS board members are required on appointment to sign an undertaking that they will comply with the provisions of the codes. A copy of the codes is available in the Library.
Nhs Information Technology
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) clinical and (b) non-clinical NHS staff had access to e-mail and web browsing by (i) March 2003 and (ii) March 2004. [R] [171825]
Numbers of national health service staff with email and web browsing access are shown in the table.
| March 2003 | March 2004 | |
| Clinical staff | 715,888 | 874,813 |
| Total NHS staff | 1,022,488 | 1,048,485 |
Nhs Staff (Wirral, South)
To ask the secretary of State for Health if he will make a statement on the levels of elective admissions to the NHS in Wirral South in the past five years. [172690]
I refer my hon. Friend to the response I gave on 10 May 2004, Official Report, columns 162–63W.
Nurse Training
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many whole-time equivalent (a) health visitors, (b) school nurses, (c) district nurses and (d) community psychiatric nurses were in training in each region in September of each year since 1997, broken down by (i) gender and (ii) ethnic origin. [172707]
Information on the number of whole-time equivalent health visitors, school nurses, district nurses and community psychiatric nurses in training in each national health service region as constituted until 31 March 1998 is shown in Table 1, for each national health service region as constituted between 1 April 1998 and 31 March 2001 is shown in Table 2, and for each Government office region between 1 April 2001 and 31 March 2002 is shown in Table 3.Information on the gender and ethnic origin of health visitors, school nurses, district nurses and community psychiatric nurses, in training is not available.
| Table 1: Student populations by regional office area, 1997–98 | ||||
| Whole-time equivalents | ||||
| School nurses | District nurses | Health visitors | Community psychiatric nurses | |
| England | 128 | 603 | 623 | 333 |
| Northern and Yorkshire | 35 | 120 | 115 | 51 |
| Trent | — | 42 | 52 | — |
| Anglia and Oxford | 8 | 75 | 73 | 71 |
| North Thames | 16 | 76 | 84 | 65 |
| South Thames | 34 | 119 | 117 | 73 |
| South and West | — | 57 | 61 | — |
| West Midlands | 35 | 62 | 53 | 43 |
| North West | — | 53 | 69 | 31 |
| Source: | ||||
| Finance and Workforce Information Returns. | ||||
Table 2: Student populations by regional office area
| ||||
Whole-time equivalents
| ||||
School nurses
| District nurses
| Health visitors
| Community psychiatric nurses
| |
| 1998–99 | ||||
| England | 119 | 542 | 580 | 250 |
| Northern and Yorkshire | 31 | 103 | 129 | 13 |
| Trent | 7 | 50 | 55 | 3 |
| West Midlands | 19 | 62 | 52 | 40 |
| North West | 14 | 64 | 76 | 37 |
| Eastern | 5 | 38 | 38 | 26 |
| London | 24 | 93 | 101 | 55 |
| South East | 19 | 96 | 89 | 64 |
| South West | 1 | 36 | 42 | 13 |
| 1999–2000 | ||||
| England | 137 | 572 | 598 | 252 |
| Northern and Yorkshire | 27 | 127 | 142 | 38 |
| Trent | 9 | 43 | 53 | 3 |
| West Midlands | 18 | 67 | 52 | 34 |
| North West | 23 | 71 | 84 | 30 |
| Eastern | 10 | 46 | 53 | 38 |
| London | 24 | 101 | 99 | 43 |
| South East | 20 | 89 | 81 | 51 |
| South West | 7 | 28 | 34 | 16 |
| 2000–01 | ||||
| England | 162 | 560 | 710 | 207 |
| Northern and Yorkshire | 18 | 80 | 190 | 6 |
| Trent | 14 | 49 | 59 | — |
| West Midlands | 20 | 67 | 60 | 34 |
| North West | 23 | 71 | 84 | 30 |
| Eastern | 18 | 53 | 68 | 29 |
| London | 28 | 103 | 105 | 67 |
| South East | 21 | 96 | 101 | 34 |
| South West | 20 | 42 | 44 | 7 |
Source:
| ||||
| Finance and Workforce Information Returns. | ||||
Table 3: Student populations by Government regional office area, 2001–02
| ||||
Whole-time equivalents
| ||||
School nurses
| District nurses
| Health visitors
| Community psychiatric nurses
| |
| England | 147 | 520 | 622 | 160 |
| North East | 10 | 61 | 69 | 6 |
| North West | 31 | 84 | 96 | 21 |
| Yorkshire and the Humber | 25 | 102 | 99 | — |
| East Midlands | 6 | — | 61 | — |
| West Midlands | 24 | 68 | 64 | 41 |
| East of England | 4 | 14 | 18 | 12 |
| London | 28 | 100 | 113 | 57 |
| South East | 20 | 92 | 104 | 24 |
| South West | — | — | — | — |
Source:
| ||||
| Finance and Workforce Information Returns. | ||||
Statins (Warrington, North)
To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people in Warrington North are being treated with statins. [172846]
The information requested is not collected on a constituency basis and neither is the number of people currently being prescribed statins. However, the number of statins prescribed for Warrington Primary Care Trust is shown in the table.
| Total number of statins prescribed by general practitioner practices in the community, in England, for the year beginning January 2003. | ||
| Region/type of region | Prescription items | prescription items per 1,000 population |
| Warrington (PCT) | 99,462 | 522 |
| Cheshire and Merseyside (SHA) | 1,363,439 | 582 |
| England Total1 | 21,606,624 | 441 |
| 1The England total includes a small number of prescription items, prescribed by GPs, that the PPA have been unable to allocate to a PCT or SHA. | ||
Notes:
1. The information, by PCT and strategic health authority (SHA), was obtained from the Prescribing Analysis and Cost (PACT) system, which covers prescriptions prescribed by general practitioner practices and dispensed in the community. Prescriptions written within a GP practice but dispensed outside the PCT or SHA will be included in the PCT or SHA in which,
In-patient waiting list by provider for the Burnley area (1996–2004)
| ||||||||
Months waiting to be seen
| ||||||||
Unit name
| Total
| 0–2
| 3–5
| 6–8
| 9–11
| 12–14
| 15–17
| |
| 1997–98 | Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust | 6,157 | 3,061 | 1,470 | 968 | 625 | 33 | 0 |
| 1997–98 | Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust | 6,569 | 3,224 | 1,844 | 1,087 | 412 | 2 | 0 |
| 1998–99 | Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust | 4,895 | 2,908 | 1,092 | 546 | 288 | 61 | 0 |
| 1998–99 | Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust | 5,357 | 3,231 | 1,103 | 691 | 318 | 14 | 0 |
| 1999–2000 | Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust | 4,803 | 2,458 | 1,190 | 639 | 377 | 120 | 19 |
| 1999–2000 | Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust | 5,084 | 2,977 | 1,202 | 606 | 251 | 48 | 0 |
| 2000–01 | Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust | 4,554 | 2,335 | 1,207 | 686 | 326 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000–01 | Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust | 5,032 | 2,924 | 1,283 | 593 | 232 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001–02 | Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust | 4,749 | 2,266 | 1,165 | 778 | 405 | 135 | 0 |
| 2001–02 | Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust | 4,883 | 2,532 | 1,303 | 692 | 356 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002–03 | Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust | 4,595 | 2,219 | 1,223 | 761 | 392 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002–03 | Blackburn Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust | 3,968 | 2,375 | 1,078 | 432 | 83 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003–04 | East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust | 8,100 | 5,045 | 2,200 | 855 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Out-patient waiting list by Provider for the Burnley area (1996–2004)
| |||
Weeks waiting to be seen from a GP referral to consultant appointment
| |||
Unit name
| Not seen 13 to 25
| Not seen 26 plus
| |
| 1997–98 | Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust | 1,266 | 69 |
| 1997–98 | Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust | 66 | 0 |
| 1998–99 | Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust | 2,371 | 895 |
| 1998–99 | Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust | 815 | 258 |
| 1999–2000 | Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust | 2,158 | 1,455 |
| 1999–2000 | Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust | 516 | 147 |
| 2000–01 | Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust | 1,548 | 521 |
| 2000–01 | Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust | 283 | 24 |
| 2001–02 | Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust | 1,094 | 0 |
| 2001–02 | Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Healthcare NHS Trust | 246 | 0 |
Weeks waiting to be seen from a GP referral to consultant appointment
| |||||
Unit name
| Not seen 13–17
| Not seen 17–21
| Not seen 21–26
| Not seen 26 plus
| |
| 2002–03 | Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust | 603 | 273 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002–03 | Blackburn Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust | 164 | 55 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003–04 | East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust | 291 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Source:
| |||||
| Department of Health QM08 | |||||
respectively, the GP pr ictice is based. Prescriptions written in England but dispensed outside England are included. Prescriptions written in Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man but dispensed in England are excluded.
2. Prescriptions are written on a prescription form. Each single item written on the form, is counted as a prescription item.
3. The figures for Statins represent data on the following chemical entities: atorvastatin; cerivastatin; fluvastatin sodium; lovastatin; pravastatin sodium; rosuvastatin calcium; simvastatin.
Writing Lists/Times
To ask the Secretary of State for Health what changes there have been to NHS waiting list times in the last seven years for the residents of Burnley. [167953]
Information on national health service waiting list times is not gathered on a constituency basis. The tables show information based on NHS organisations serving the Burnley area.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health for what medical treatment there is the longest waiting time for (a) consultation and (b) treatment at NHS hospitals within the Greater London area. [173078]
The treatment area with the longest wait to receive a first out-patient appointment with a consultant within the five London strategic health authorities (SHAs) is clinical immunology and allergy.Of a selection of common, elective, surgical operations, the one with the longest average wait to receive admitted treatment within the five London SHAs is knee replacement.
Prime Minister
Iraq
To ask the Prime Minister if he will estimate how many Iraqi (a) women, (b) children and (c) civilians have been (i) killed and (ii) injured in the recent siege of Fallujah. [171976]
The Coalition always take great care to minimise the risks to civilians in all areas of Iraq. It is not always possible to confirm whether casualties have occurred, as Coalition forces are not always able to enter the areas from which they are being fired on. There are further difficulties in estimating numbers of deaths when those deaths have been caused by terrorist attacks.
To ask the Prime Minister (1) pursuant to his answer of 12 May 2004, Official Report, column 385W, on Iraq, whether the three UK military personnel were working in the military intelligence section of Abu Ghraig prison; [174330](2) whether the three UK military personnel who worked in Abu Ghraib prison between January and April were under the command of
(a) British and (b) US authorities during that time; and to which authority they reported. [174328]
Yes. The three military personnel were under British Command at all times, reporting to the Senior British Military Representative in Baghdad. They assisted in gathering information important to the Coalition's aim of establishing stability in Iraq through interviewing detainees.
Trade And Industry
Chapelcross
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry pursuant to the answer on Chapelcross, of 13 May 2004, Official Report, column 489, whether a breach of the air exclusion zone around Chapelcross took place in 2003; and if she will make a statement. [175147]
No breach of the air exclusion zone at the Chapelcross nuclear power station took place in 2003.
Mail Services (Northern Ireland)
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what estimate she has made of the number of mail items which were not delivered in Northern Ireland in the last 12 months. [173591]
Delivery services are the operational concern of Royal Mail Group and I have therefore asked the Chief Executive to reply direct to the hon. Member.
Research Assessment Exercise
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will take steps to bridge the funding gap for research projects consequent on implementation of the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise. [174183]
The 2002 Spending Review announced the largest sustained growth in science for a decade, providing an additional £1.25 billion a year by 2005 06, including:
a dedicated stream of capital for Higher Education Institutions to develop their science research infrastructure;
substantial new resources to Research Councils to enable them to make a higher contribution to the full costs of the research they sponsor;
Alongside this, changes are being implemented, following consultation, to make explicit the responsibility of HEIs for ensuring the long-term sustainability of their research enterprises and to enable them to cost and price research projects more effectively, whether publicly or privately funded. Taken together these measures will, over time, make a substantial impact on the quality and sustainability of the research base.The Government will set out its future priorities for science and innovation in a 10-year Investment Framework for Science and Innovation, to be published in the summer.increased funding for the Higher Education Funding Council for England for the research component of HEI block grants, to underpin project funding.
Advantage West Midlands
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what the cost was of (a) developing and (b) maintaining (i) the Advantage West Midlands website and (ii) each regional development agency's website in each financial year since 1999. [172372]
[holding answer 13 May 2004]: The information requested is set out in the following table.
| £ | |||
| East of England Development Agency | |||
| 1999–2000 | Not available | Not available | Not available |
| 2000–01 | Not available | Not available | Not available |
| 2001–02 | Not available | Not available | 7,000 |
| 2002–03 | Not available | Not available | 8.900 |
| 2003–04 | Not available | Not available | 5,675 |
| East Midlands Development Agency | |||
| 1999–2000 | 26,000 | 20 | 46 |
| 2000–01 | 26 | 20 | 46 |
| 2001–02 | 26 | 20 | 46 |
| 2002–03 | 26 | 20 | 46 |
| 2003–04 | 26 | 20 | 46 |
| £ | |||
| London Development Agency | |||
| 1999–2000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000–01 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001–02 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002–03 | 36,515 | 18,000 | 54,515 |
| 2003–04 | 36,515 | 21,000 | 57,515 |
| Northwest DevelopmentAgency | |||
| 1999–2000 | Not available | Not available | Not available |
| 2000–01 | Not available | Not available | Not available |
| 2001–02 | Not available | Not available | 5,000 |
| 2002–03 | Not available | Not available | 51,214 |
| 2003–04 | Not available | Not available | 37,964 |
| ONE North East | |||
| 1999–2000 | 20,735 | 0 | 20,735 |
| 2000–01 | 45,127 | 11,388 | 56,515 |
| 2001–02 | 71,204 | 17,520 | 88,724 |
| 2002–03 | 12,050 | 17,520 | 29,570 |
| 2003–04 | 50,275 | 17,520 | 67,795 |
| South East England Development Agency | |||
| 1999–2000 | Not available | Not available | 7,954 |
| 2000–01 | Not available | Not available | 20,160 |
| 2001–02 | Not available | Not available | 39,234 |
| 2002–03 | Not available | Not available | 48,242 |
| 2003–04 | 10,457 | 27,213 | 37,671 |
| South West of England Regional Development Agency | |||
| 1999–2000 | 8,400 | 2.000 | 104,700 |
| 2000–01 | 14,465 | 32,735 | 47,200 |
| 2001–02 | 0 | 30,000 | 30,000 |
| 2002–03 | 145,200 | 15,000 | 160,200 |
| 2003–04 | 27,000 | 30,000 | 57,000 |
| Yorkshire Forward | |||
| 1999–2000 | Not available | Not available | 0 |
| 2000–01 | Not available | Not available | 23,275 |
| 2001–02 | Not available | Not available | 14,306 |
| 2002–03 | Not available | Not available | 58,000 |
| 2003–04 | Not available | Not available | 36.647 |
Note:
A breakdown is not available as the services were contracted out.
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what the salary bill was of (a) Advantage West Midlands and (b) each regional development agency for staff employed in a press office or public relations capacity in each financial year since 1999; and what the average salary was for staff employed in a press office or public relations capacity in each case in each year. [172373]
[holding answer 13 May 2004]: The information requested is set out in the following table:
| RDA | Total salary of relevant RDA staff | Average salary of RDA relevant RDA staff |
| Advantage West Midlands | 1999–2000: N/a | N/a |
| 2000–01: N/a | N/a | |
| 2001–02: 24,136 | 24,136 | |
| 2002–03: 80,519 | 26,839 | |
| 2003–04: 96,692 | 32,230 | |
| East of England Development Agency | 1999–2000: 77,000 | 31,000 |
| 2000–01: 100,000 | 33,000 | |
| 2001–02: 99,000 | 30,000 | |
| 2002–03: 104,000 | 32,000 | |
| 2003–04: 112,000 | 32,000 | |
| East Midlands Development | 1999–2000: N/a | N/a |
| 2000–01: Outsourced | N/a | |
| 2001–02: Outsourced | N/a | |
| 2002–03: 52,000 | 26,000 | |
| 2003–04: 52.000 | 26,000 | |
| London Development Agency | 1999–2000: Nil | Nil |
| 2000–01: Nil | Nil | |
| 2000–02: Nil | Nil | |
| 2002–03: 195,000 | 39,000 | |
| 2003–04: 193,000 | 39,000 | |
| Northwest Development Agency | 1999–2000: Nil | Nil |
| 2000–01: Nil | Nil | |
| 2001–02: 71,123 | 17,780 | |
| 2002–03: 88,582 | 17,716 | |
| 2003–04: 109,078 | 15,582 | |
| ONE North East | 1999–2000: 106,305 | 17,717 |
| 2000–01: 111.900 | 18,650 | |
| 2001–02:117.790 | 19,361 | |
| 2002–03: 135,103 | 22,517 | |
| 2003–04: 175,242 | 25,034 | |
| South East England Development Agency | 1999–2000:75,130 | 35,956 |
| 2000–01: 87,530 | 37,510 | |
| 2001–02:87,122 | 29,408 | |
| 2002–03: 151,423 | 33,694 | |
| 2003–04: 187,737 | 30,288 | |
| South West of England Regional Development Agency | 1999–2000: 24.754 | 19,877 |
| 2000–01: 68,989 | 28,830 | |
| 2001–02:110,965 | 27,741 | |
| 2002–03: 184,280 | 31,782 | |
| 2003–04: 263,465 | 29,583 | |
| Yorkshire Forward | 1999–2000:41,666 | 20,833 |
| 2000–01: 82,623 | 20,655 | |
| 2001–02: 83,549 | 23,871 | |
| 2002–03: 70,561 | 20,160 | |
| 2003–04:82,992 | 23,712 |
Disconnections
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1) if site will make a statement on actions being taken by (a) Ofgem and (b) industry to minimise disconnections made in error; [174361](2) what assessment she has made of the impact of energy disconnections for debt; [174362](3) how many household
(a) gas and (b) electricity disconnections were made in each year from 2000; and how many were made in error in each case in each year. [174363]
Disconnection remains an appropriate action of last resort where a customer has repeatedly failed to respond to efforts to secure payment or to make specific repayment arrangements. However, this power must be subject to appropriate safeguards. I welcome the arrangements proposed by Ofgem and energy suppliers in April to improve those safeguards to protect vulnerable customers. The total number of disconnections for debt between 2000 and 2003 was:
| Gas | Electricity | Total | |
| 2000 | 16,500 | 300 | 16,800 |
| 2001 | 26,088 | 375 | 26,463 |
| 2002 | 21,780 | 995 | 22,775 |
| 2003 | 15,973 | 1,361 | 17,334 |
European Research Council
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how close to the market the research is in which the European Research Council will be involved. [174130]
The possible establishment of a European Research Council is still at an early stage, and no proposal has yet been made by the European Commission, but it should not detract from the more directly industry-oriented research, historically funded by the Framework Programme. The Government are currently consulting about the matter as part of its overall consultation on Framework Programme 7, a copy has been placed in the Libraries of the House.
Fireworks Ban
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will make a statement on her proposals to ban category 4 firesworks from consumer sale. [174382]
[holding answer 19 May 2004]: The supply of category 4 fireworks to the general public was banned in 1997 with the coming into force of the Fireworks (Safety) Regulations. Only fireworks professionals may purchase this type of firework.Additionally, under these Regulations only fireworks that comply with the British Standard—BS 7114—are to be supplied to ordinary consumers.
Insolvency
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many cases have been handled by the Insolvency Service Protracted Realisations Unit in each year since 1998; what the (a) gross and (b) net flow of cases was in each year; and what the average professional fee charged by an insolvency practitioner handling a protracted realisations unit case during that time was. [173277]
The Protracted Realisations Unit was created in October 1999, the figures in the table list how many cases had been handled in each year by the Unit from October 1999 to 31 March 2004.
| Year to 31 March | B/fwd | Input | Sent IPs | Closings | C/fwd |
| 1999 | None | — | — | — | — |
| September 1999 to 31 March 2000 | 33,027 | 1,355 | 519 | 1,724 | 32,139 |
| 2001 | 32,139 | 4,727 | 1,382 | 3,205 | 32,279 |
| 2002 | 32,279 | 3,816 | 1,926 | 3,303 | 30,866 |
| 2003 | 30,866 | 3,816 | 2,762 | 5,078 | 26,842 |
| 2004 | 26,842 | 1,566 | 3,876 | 3,200 | 21,332 |
| Total | — | 15,280 | 10,465 | 16,510 | — |
International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will make a statement on (a) the siting and (b) cost sharing of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor. [174579]
The international partners are trying to reach a compromise on the two proposed locations for ITER that will be acceptable to the whole ITER partnership. Currently the €4.5 billion budget for the construction of the ITER facility is to be shared as follows:
| Percentage | € | |
| Europe or Japan as host | 48 | 2.2 billion |
| Europe or Japan as non-host | 12 | 540 million |
| US | 10 | 450 million |
| China | 10 | 450 million |
| Russia | 10 | 450 million |
| South Korea | 10 | 450 million |
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what level of fusion research funding she will make available after the decision on the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor has been taken; and if she will make a statement. [174580]
Funding for the UK's national fusion programme is determined by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, which took over this function in April 2003. It is currently in the region of £16 million per year. Europe's participation in ITER will be funded through the Framework Programme.
Mail Services
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions her Department has had with (a) Royal Mail and (b) Postwatch on the disappearance of mail. [174530]
DTI Ministers and officials meet representatives from the Royal Mail and Postwatch on a regular basis to discuss a wide range of issues, including quality of service and lost mail.
Nuclear Installations
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if she will make a statement on the operation to date of the Sellafield MOX plant. [173347]
The Sellafield Mox Plant (SMP) is currently undergoing plutonium commissioning prior to meeting its first overseas orders. I understand from BNFL that various technical challenges, which are not unduly surprising in such a sophisticated plant, are being addressed by the company.
Post Office
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry when she last discussed the question of deprived wards with reference to the application of the urban reinvention programme by Post Office Ltd.; and what interpretation the Post Office uses of the term deprived ward; and if she will make a statement. [173919]
In accordance with the recommendations of the Performance and Innovation Unit's year 2000 report 'Counter Revolution—Modernising the Post Office Network', the Government have provided support for post offices in deprived urban areas of England in the form of the Deprived Urban Post Office Fund administered by the Neighbourhood Renewal Unit of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Similar schemes are administered by the devolved Administrations of Scotland and Wales while the merits of such a scheme are being considered in Northern Ireland. I announced on 5 February details of changes agreed by Post Office Ltd. and Postwatch to the current programme to restructure the post office network in urban areas which includes clarification of criteria to define exceptional circumstances under which Post Office Ltd. might propose to close a post office branch in a deprived urban area without an alternative within a half a mile. I understand that the Post Office uses the Indices of Deprivation 2000 to define its interpretation of an urban deprive ward.
Sellafield
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what timescale is being applied to the decommissioning of the B30 ponds at Sellafield. [173462]
HSE's Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII) has issued a number of Specifications for remediation activities at Sellafield.A Specification issued by NII in 2000, requires BNFL to retrieve at least 90 per cent. of the potentially mobile intermediate level radioactive waste sludge from the B30 ponds and bays by 2010.BNFL is continuing work to develop detailed plans necessary to meet that deadline.
Winkleigh Biomass Project
To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much direct or indirect expenditure by (a) central Government and (b) regional development agencies (i) has been incurred and (ii) is planned in connection with the proposed Winkleigh Biomass Project; and on what the expenditure was or will be incurred. [169461]
[holding answer 29 April 2004]: In relation to payments by the Department and the South West of England Regional Development Agency (SWRDA), the information requested was set out in the answer provided by my hon. Friend the Minister for State for Energy, E-Commerce and Postal Services on 11 March 2004, Official Report, column 1674W.The grant undertaking awarded under the Bioenergy Capital Grants Scheme will provide £11.05 million conditional on successful construction and commissioning of the plant.The funding approved by the South West of England Regional Development Agency (SWRDA) is to support the costs of feasibility studies (an Environmental Impact Assessment, a Biomass Study and an Economic Impact Assessment) and associated technical studies. These do not commit the Agency to any further expenditure. In addition SWRDA has bought land which, if the project were to go ahead, could be resold to the project at open market value.I am not aware that any other Regional Development Agency or Department has made any payments to this project or has any plans to do so.
Deputy Prime Minister
Council Tax
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the cost to (a) the Valuation Office Agency, (b) the Valuation Tribunals and (c) central Government of administering (i) council tax and (ii) council tax benefit was in financial year 2001–02. [174359]
The information is as follows:
Council Tax Revaluation
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the estimated cost to (a) his Department, (b) the Valuation Office Agency and (c) other Government agencies and bodies was of council tax revaluation for financial years (i) 2003–04, (ii) 2005–06 and (iii) 2006–07. [174358]
The information is as follows:
Departmental Officials
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister which former officials of the Department have asked for permission to join (a) PricewaterhouseCoopers,(b) Deloitte & Touche, (c) Ernst & Young and (d) KPMG. [156901]
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister was created on 29 May 2002. Since that date there have been no requests from former officials seeking permission to join Pricewaterhouse Coopers, Deloitte & Touche, Ernst & Young and KPMG.
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what secondments (a) PricewaterhouseCoopers, (b) Deloitte & Touche, (c) Ernst & Young and (d) KPMG has made to his Department since 2001; for what (i) periods and (ii) tasks the secondments were made; whether secondments of staff from his Department have been made to those firms; and for what (A) periods and (B) tasks. [156930]
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister was created on 29 May 2002. Since that date there has been one inward secondment from PricewaterhouseCoopers, and none from the other organisations specified. The inward secondee, working in Local Government Efficiency Unit, started work in September 2001 and their secondment ended on 31 March 2004.No staff from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister have been seconded to any of the organisations specified.Secondments are part of the Interchange Initiative which promotes the exchange of people and good practice between the civil service and other organisations. Before an Interchange can occur all parties must be satisfied that no conflict of interests arises.
Employment Agencies
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will list the employment agencies which his Department and its predecessors have used to supply temporary staff in each financial year since 1996–97 to the most recent date for which figures are available. [163807]
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister was created on 29 May 2002. The Office has contracts for the supply of temporary staff with three recruitment agencies: Adecco, Brook Street and Reed. These contracts were awarded as a result of an invitation to tender by the Office.
Fire Service
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what plans the Government have for inter-brigade co-operation in the Fire Service in the event of a serious emergency. [174674]
The Government are keen to ensure a co-ordinated response from the fire and rescue service in the event of a major emergency. That is why all fire and rescue authorities have been invited to sign a Mutual Aid Agreement, which will enable individual fire and rescue authorities to ask for assistance from another authority in the event of a serious emergency.The development of the Mutual Aid Agreement forms part of the Government's commitment to improving resilience and the fire and rescue service's response to a major incident. The Fire and Rescue Services Bill, currently progressing through Parliament, should make such an agreement easier to establish in future as it will extend authorities' ability to enter into mutual reinforcement schemes to include new duties such as responding to the increased terrorist threat.The Government have also established the New Dimension programme, which will help to ensure a co-ordinated response to any terrorist incidents on a national scale by providing suitable equipment and training to deal with such incidents. A national co-ordination centre is being established in order to provide central command and control when the New Dimension equipment is utilised. This will remain in place until such time as the regional control rooms are operational, when they will direct resources on a regional basis.
Housing
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether his Community Housing Task Force has yet been integrated within the Government office network; how many of its staff are (a) civil servants and (b) consultants; and what services they provide to local authorities whose tenants have voted to reject the Government's three options for council house privatisation. [174661]
From 1 June, the Task Force advisers will be allocated to their respective Government office regions and will fall under the line management of their respective Government office housing directors. The practical arrangements are being agreed and formalised.There are 13 civil servants on fixed term contracts and three on secondments arrangements from local authorities and the National Housing Federation. There are no consultants working in the task force.Where tenants have rejected the options to deliver the decent homes target, the Community Housing Task Force will continue to support local authorities and its tenants to investigate other options within the decent home policy framework to achieve decent homes by 2010.
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister (1) for what reasons North East Lincolnshire was not granted the full sum for gap funding for its housing transfer for which it had applied; what assessment he has made of the effect this has on the business plans for the new housing association; and what plans he has to make supplementary gap funding available to North East Lincolnshire under the new arrangements for gap funding for areas of negative equity; [174500](2) whether the supplementary gap funding he announced in the week beginning 10 May for housing transfers in areas with negative equity will be made available to North East Lincolnshire. [174663]
North East Lincolnshire sought £6 million, £2 million annually for three years, from the Yorkshire and Humber Regional Housing Board transitional commissioning as gap funding to cover the negative valuation of its stock to enable its Large Scale Voluntary Transfer (LSVT) proposal to proceed. The Board has agreed in principle to such a level of funding, with years two and three subject to the outcome of the Comprehensive Spending Review. It has invited the Council to submit a final proposal by 4 June 2004 with a view to the Board making its final decision on 14 July 2004. Discussions will take place with the Board as to whether there is merit for their commitment to be absorbed within the central gap funding arrangements.
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what councils, how many houses and how much land have been admitted to the Stock Transfer programme for each year since 2002–03; how many applied for inclusion; and what assessment he has made of what this means for future financing of councils which submit proposals by his deadline of July 2005. [174655]
The following lists and tables show those councils which have applied for and/or been granted places on the Large Scale Voluntary Transfer (LSVT) programmes since 2002 and also the number of dwellings involved.The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister does not hold information on how much land has been involved in stock transfer.Local authorities transferring their housing stock under the LSVT programmes will have no impact on the future financing of social housing in other local authorities.
Names of local authorities granted places on LSVT programmes since 2002: 2002 programme
- Amber Valley
- Bromsgrove
- Cannock Chase
- Cherwell
- Forest of Dean
- London Borough of Ealing
- London Borough of Hackney
- London Borough of Islington
- London Borough of Southwark
- Liverpool County Council
- Maidstone Borough Council
- Manchester City Council
- Middlesbrough Council
- North Hertfordshire
- Nuneaton and Bedworth
- Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council
- Rushcliffe Borough Council
- Scarborough Borough Council
- Sheffield City Council
- Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council
- South Norfolk Council
- Stockport
- Teignbridge
- Worcester.
2003 programme
- Copeland
- Forest Heath District Council
- Hartlepool Borough Council
- London Borough of Barking and Dagenham
- London Borough of Hackney London
- Borough of Islington
- London Borough of Lambeth
- London Borough of Tower Hamlets
- Manchester City Council
- Middlesbrough
- North East Lincolnshire
- Peterborough County Council
- Purbeck District Council
- Royal Borough of Kingston
- South Norfolk
- Stroud District Council
- Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council
- Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
- Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council.
2004 programme
- Broxbourne Borough Council
- Ellesmere Port and Neston
- Halton Borough Council
- Hyndburn
- Kings Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council
- Lambeth
- London Borough of Tower Hamlets
- Macclesfield
- Mid Devon
- North Somerset
- Sedgefield Sheffield
- Stafford Borough Council
- West Lancashire District Council.
Number of dwellings gr
| |
Programme
| Number
|
| 2002 | 180,794 |
| 2003 | 123,543 |
| 2004 | 76,052 |
Names of local authorities applying for places on LSVT programmes since 2002:
2002 programme
- Amber Valley Borough Council
- Bromsgrove District Council
- Cannock Chase
- Cherwell District Council
- Copeland Borough Council
- Forest of Dean District Council
- London Borough of Hackney
- London Borough of Islington
- London Borough of Southwark
- Liverpool County Council
- Maidstone
- Manchester Council
- Middlesbrough Council
- North Hertfordshire
- Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council
- Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council
- Rushcliffe Borough Council
- Scarborough Borough Council
- Sheffield County Council
- Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council
- South Norfolk Council
- Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
- Teignbridge District Council
- Worcester.
2003 programme
- Forest Heath District Council
- Hartlepool Borough Council
- London Borough of Barking and Dagenham
- London Borough of Hackney
- London Borough of Islington
- London Borough of Lambeth
- London Borough of Tower Hamlets
- Manchester City Council
- Middlesbrough
- North East Lincolnshire
- Peterborough County Council
- Purbeck District Council
- Royal Borough of Kingston
- Stroud District Council
- Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council
- Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
- Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council.
2004 programme
- Broxbourne Borough Council
- Copeland
- Ellesmere Port and Neston
- Halton Borough Council
- Hyndburn
- Kings Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council
- Lambeth
- London Borough of Tower Hamlets
- Macclesfield
- Manchester City Council
- Mid Devon
- North Norfolk
- North Somerset
- Preston
- Sedgefield Sheffield
- Stafford Borough Council
- Teesdale
- West Lancashire District Council
Number of dwellings applying for places on LSVT programmes since 2002
| |
Programme
| Number
|
| 2002 | 180,794 |
| 2003 | 125,806 |
| 2004 | 115,063 |
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what (a) support, (b) advice and (c) guidance his officials have provided to North East Lincolnshire in connection with its campaign for the large-scale voluntary transfer of its housing stock; what estimate he has made of the cost of (i) staff time, (ii) travel and (iii) other expenditure in connection with such support, advice and guidance; and how much of that cost is payable by North East Lincolnshire. [174549]
As with any local authority on the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's Disposals Programme, North East Lincolnshire council have discussed their stock transfer proposals with officials of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister at each stage of the process, including seeking advice and guidance on all public consultation material. We make no specific estimate of the cost of staff time, travel or other expenditure in connection with the giving of support, advice or guidance to any particular local authority. No payment has been made by the council for any advice or support.
Land Developers
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what advice is given to local authorities on how best to assess whether developers have sought brownfield site alternatives before proposing back land development. [174462]
Planning Policy Guidance Note 3: "Housing" (PPG3) says that the country's housing needs should be met in the most sustainable way possible, giving priority to re-using suitable brownfield land in preference to the development of greenfield sites. PPG3 advises local planning authorities, in preparing their local plans, to adopt a systematic approach to assessing the development potential of sites and the redevelopment of existing buildings, deciding which are most suitable for housing development and the sequence in which development should take place. It is for local planning authorities to consider whether proposals for back land development are in principle consistent with the local plan (or where this is not up-to-date, the relevant criteria set out in PPG3) and are well-designed.
Local Authorities Complaints Fees
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister (1) if he will restrict the maximum fee which a local authority can charge persons who make a complaint against a nuisance hedge grower to £100; [174581](2) when he will report on his consultation on the maximum fee which a local authority can charge persons who wish to make a complaint against a nuisance hedge grower. [174582]
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister will not be deciding the maximum fee which local authorities will be able to charge people making a complaint about a nuisance high hedge until we have analysed the responses to the current public consultation on implementing Part 8 of the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003. The consultation period runs until 30 June. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister expects to report the results of the consultation and to bring the legislation into operation towards the end of 2004.
Local Authority Leisure Services
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what estimate he has made of the saving to local authorities of contracting out leisure services to the private sector. [174052]
The information requested is not held centrally, and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Press Officers
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many press officers were employed in his Department in each year from 1990–91 to 2003–04; what the total cost was in each year; and if he will make a statement. [162851]
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister was created on 29 May 2002.On 1 April 2003, ODPM
(c) employed 21.8 full-time equivalent press officers. Salary costs for the period 1 June 2002 to 31 March 2003 were £0.86 million.
On 1 March 2004, 23 full-time equivalent press officers were employed. Salary costs for the period 1 April 2003 to 29 February 2004 were £0.96 million.
Regional Government
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the total cost to his Department was of the event on elected regional assemblies held in Barrow on 5 May 2004; how many staff from his Department were involved; how many staff from Government Office North West were involved; and if he will place in the Library a copy of the speech delivered by the Minister for Local and Regional Government. [172756]
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister estimates that the Barrow hearing cost £3,900. This includes costs associated with venue hire and catering. Four members of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and three members of the Government office for the north-west were involved.As on previous occasions, I spoke extempore, rather than from a prepared text.
Register Of Interests
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the requirements are on officials in his Department to declare current interests; and what register of interests is kept for his departmental officials. [164707]
The Civil Service Management Code sets out the general principles and rules governing the conduct of civil servants declaring any conflict of interest. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's Staff Handbook states that staff are required to seek permission from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister before undertaking any activity that might result in a conflict of interest and all applications are kept on file.
Timber Purchases
To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how (a) the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, (b) its regional offices, (c) the Fire Service College, (d) the Ordnance Survey, (e) the Planning Inspectorate, (f) the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre and (g) the Rent Service monitor and audit purchases of timber and timber products to ensure that they meet the Department's stated commitment to being obtained from legal and sustainable sources. [164676]
The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, its regional offices and its agencies are committed to the Government Policy on the purchase of Legal and Sustainable forested wood and this is fully supported in our Greening Operations Policy Statement.Contracts where the use of timber and timber based products is anticipated, contain clauses that require the supplier to actively seek legally sourced and sustainable timber and to supply physical evidence that supports this. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has the use of framework contracts for the purchase of furniture, which are subject to supply chain audit by officials.Timber and timber based products have been adopted within the certificated and independently audited Environmental Management Systems which the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has developed to manage our response to the "Framework for Sustainable Development on the Government Estate".It is expected that Government targets associated with Timber Procurement will be published in the coming months and officials in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister will be incorporating this into our procurement processes.Although the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has overall responsibility for the buildings occupied by Government Offices, they carry out functions on behalf of 10 Departments.