Following the announcement that the Budget will take place on 16 March, HM Treasury plans to publish the Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2005 on Thursday, 7 April 2005.

The Secretary of State and Lord Chancellor has today set the following key performance targets for Her Majesty's Land Registry for 2005–06.

Her Majesty's Land Registry key performance indicators and targets 2005–06*

Customer Service

Speed:

Percentage of Official Copy and Search applications processed within two working days: 98 per cent.

Percentage of all registrations processed within 18 working days: 80 per cent.

Accuracy:

Percentage of registrations processed free of any error: 98.5 per cent.

Overall Satisfaction:

Percentage of customers who, overall, are very satisfied/satisfied with the full range ofservices provided by Land Registry: Better than 95 per cent.

Financial:

Percentage return on average capital employed: 3.5 per cent.

Efficiency

Cost per unit in cash terms² (real terms)³ : £30.01 ¹ (£21.75)

¹ This is a milestone towards the HM Treasury agreed cost per unit target for 2006–07 of £28.81 in cash terms (£20.27 in real terms).

² Based on the GDP deflator issued by HM Treasury on 23rd December 2004 (base year 1992–93).

³ The real terms unit cost in the base year of 1992–93 was £30.65.

Critical Action Points

Customer Service

Make scanned deeds referred to on the register available electronically via land Register Online

Land Registration:

Register for the first time an additional 5 per cent. of the area of freehold land in England and Wales

Electronic Service Delivery:

Provide a further data centre for business continuity purposes

Other Business Development:

Complete electronic document authentication prototyping.

* More information on these and other key targets is published in the Strategic and Business Plans.

My noble Friend the Secretary of State has made the following written ministerial statement:

"I am pleased to announce today plans for the introduction of a national enforcement service to take forward my commitment to ensuring the fullest possible compliance with court orders. For too long enforcement of court orders has been patchy and flawed. We have made real improvements in enforcement. The payment rate of fines now at 80 per cent. compared with just over 50 per cent. two years ago. But there is more to be done. The time has come for the next stage of reform.

My proposals involve the introduction of a robust national framework to deliver a single consistent enforcement process for the whole of England and Wales, and to deal robustly with offenders who fail to attend court, default on fine payments and breach community penalty orders. The launch of the new unified Her Majesty's Court Service next month, will allow us to put in place a cross-criminal justice system enforcement team that is more distinct, professional and better skilled. The specific remit of the national enforcement service will be to bear down on the hard core of offenders who consistently attempt to flout their obligations to the courts. This does not mean a new agency or department, but a better, more collaborative approach to tackling enforcement, which builds on the lessons learned from national initiatives including the recent "Operation Payback". Enforcement staff in the magistrates courts together with the police, the national probation service and other criminal justice agencies will form the core of the service.

Improving sentence compliance is key to building public confidence in the criminal justice system and the national enforcement service will do just that. The national enforcement service framework will be tested first across a region from April 2006 with the aim of full national rollout in 2007–08".

I am announcing today that the key targets that have been set for the chief executive of the Veterans Agency (VA) for the financial year 2005–06 are as follows:

Service

Key Target 1:

To issue decisions on claims to war pensions in an average of no more than 59 working days. This is an improvement of four working days on the agency's 2004–05 target; and it represents a cumulative improvement of 41 per cent. against the agency's 2000–01 baseline level of 100 working days.

Key Target 2:

To issue decisions on war widows claims in an average of no more than 23 working days. This is an improvement of two working days on the agency's 2004–05 target; and it represents a cumulative improvement of 36 per cent. against the agency's 2000–01 baseline level of 36 working days.

Key Target 3:

To achieve an externally-validated war pensions scheme claims accuracy rate of at least 97 per cent.

Key Target 4:

To achieve an externally-validated AFCS claims accuracy rate of at least 97 per cent.

Key Target 5:

To achieve an externally-validated medical adjudication accuracy rate of at least 97 per cent.

Working in Partnership

Key Target 6:

To work with the Department for Constitutional Affairs Court Service to reduce the average time it takes an appeal to pass through the war pensions appeals process. By 31 March 2006 the average time should reduce to no more than 225 working days. This is an improvement of 15 working days on the agency's 2004–05 target; and it represents a cumulative improvement of 60 per cent. against its 2000–01 baseline level of 565 working days.

Efficiency

Key Target 7:

To use the agency output costing methodology developed in 2002–03 to help identify and generate such administrative efficiencies and other savings as will enable the agency to achieve a 3 per cent. reduction in 2005–06 against a comparable 2004–05 final out-turn figure.

Further to my statement of 24 February about Reading University's final report on the impact of the property industry's 2002 code of practice for commercial leases, I wish to announce our conclusions following the completion of the research and our own consultation exercise last year on upward only rent review clauses.

The Government continue to be concerned about flexibility in the commercial property market. The Reading report shows that the property market has become more flexible, notably with continuing trends towards shorter leases and break clauses, and I welcome these. However, there are still areas of inflexibility.

The Reading report indicates that the major problems are now inflexible assignment and subletting provisions in leases. These can make it difficult for tenants to dispose of properties they no longer need for their business. We intend to undertake a review of the law of assignment and subletting, with the aim of easing the position for tenants while not jeopardising property investment, including looking at legislative options.

We continue to have concerns about the prevalence of upward only rent review clauses in longer leases. The Reading report shows that their impact has been diminishing, as fewer leases contain any form of rent review provisions, and that tenants are currently more concerned about inflexible assignment and subletting provisions than they are about upward only rent reviews. We do however believe that further progress in this area is necessary to improve the flexibility of the market. We will therefore continue to monitor the situation and retain the option to legislate in future if necessary. But we do not propose to legislate against upward only rent review clauses at present.

The other major area of concern is the continuing lack of awareness of property issues among small businesses. The Reading report shows that many small businesses fail to obtain the best leasing terms available because they lack essential information about the leasing environment and the local market. There is a need for action by both the Government and the property industry.

We are asking the property industry to undertake a joint review of the code of practice, to carry out a renewed campaign to disseminate the code and provide an effective mechanism for dealing with complaints. We want to make sure that everyone negotiating a lease adopts the code.

We will be undertaking a further monitoring exercise over the next three years, and we will be looking for further movement on flexibility. We believe that achieving greater flexibility in the market is extremely important and that further market reform is essential.

We shall be inviting the property industry to join us in practical steps to improve small business knowledge of property matters.

We will shortly be making available on our website a summary of the responses to the consultation paper on upward only rent reviews. We will be placing copies of individual responses in the Library of the House while copies will also be available for public inspection in the ODPM Library.

In responding to Lord Haskins' report, the Government stated that they would commission an independent, fundamental review of the GB and UK statutory levy-funded agriculture and horticulture organisations.

We have, with colleagues in the devolved Administrations, now agreed the terms of reference for the review and a copy of them has been placed in the House today. The review will encompass the British Potato Council, the Home Grown Cereals Authority, the Horticultural Development Council, the Meat and Livestock Commission, and the Milk Development Council, taking as given the devolution of agricultural policy and the federal bodies created post-devolution under the umbrella of the Meat and Livestock Commission.

I am pleased to announce that Rosemary Radcliffe, formerly chief economist at PricewaterhouseCoopers and until recently independent complaints commissioner for the Financial Services Authority, has agreed to conduct the review. Rosemary will formally start her work on 4 April, and she will submit her report, to UK and devolved Administration Ministers, by the end of October.

Further details and information on how people may submit their views to the review have been placed in the Library of the House and are available on Defra's website.

In March 2005, after consultation with the Ministry of Defence and the export control organisations, DTI, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office donated armoured vests and body armour plates to the Iranian Anti-Narcotics Police (ANP). This gift was to provide an element of protection for the ANP in their work of countering drugs smuggling from Afghanistan. We are satisfied that these goods would only be used for anti-narcotics operations and are therefore prepared to make an exception to the UK national embargo announced in 1993, as amended in 1998.

We are fully committed to implementing the UK embargo on Iran. However, we are, in limited circumstances, prepared to make exceptions where denying an export or a gift would be contrary to the intention of the embargo. As the UK has been active in encouraging and assisting Iran with combating the smuggling of drugs from Afghanistan, I am confident that granting this exception is fully consistent with this responsible approach of supporting the ANP whilst respecting the aims of the embargo.

A departmental minute announcing the intention to make the gift was laid before Parliament on 22 February.

All export licences, F680s and Crown immunity gifts are considered on a case by case basis judged against the consolidated and national arms export licensing criteria.

The Government have today published its response to the recent consultation exercise on the future support arrangements for patient and public involvement in health.

The main features of the response include:

combining patients' forums in primary care trust areas into single forums but notreducing the number of forum members;

requiring forums to have chairs who will be appointed by the NHS Appointments Commission. These appointments will be made with the full involvement of forum members;

the development of a national resource centre in patient and public involvement that will assist both the NHS and patients' forums in their respective responsibilities in relation to patient and public involvement.

Copies have been placed in the Library.

Copies of the consultation findings as well as the Government's response are also available on the Department's website.

Today I have received further comments from Sir Michael Bichard regarding progress made in implementing the recommendations of his inquiry. Copies have been placed in the Library of the House. A progress report was made to Sir Michael in December last year, and copies placed in the Library in January. I should like to thank Sir Michael for his commitment and hard work both in the conduct of the inquiry and in his recent review of progress.

I welcome Sir Michael's comment that he has been impressed by the positive and energetic response to his recommendations. He accepts that significant progress has been made and is pleased at the positive response to his report, particularly from the police service.

In recognising this progress, Sir Michael goes on to make a number of further recommendations, aimed primarily at ensuring the effective implementation of his report findings, particularly those which give rise to long term and complex new arrangements for the management and sharing of information. These include the development of national IT infrastructure to support the handling of police information, a code of practice and detailed supporting guidance for the management and sharing of police information, and a registration scheme relating to persons wishing to work with children or vulnerable adults.

In these areas I am pleased to accept in principle Sir Michael's recommendations that careful monitoring should be in place to check on progress, that the necessary links must be made between different aspects of the programme, and that appropriate budget allocations must be made to ensure effective implementation. I also accept the need for closer working between the United Kingdom jurisdictions to ensure that there are no loopholes to be exploited between the systems operating in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. This co-operation has featured as an important element of the implementation work so far. I will also look to strengthen the work being undertaken with foreign jurisdictions from which large numbers of staff come to the United Kingdom to work with children and vulnerable adults.

I shall be considering the detail of Sir Michael's comments with ministerial colleagues, and a full response will be sent to Sir Michael shortly. This will be placed in the Library of the House. I am happy to accept Sir Michael's recommendation that further progress reports should be made available to Parliament and to the public in six and 12 months' time.

As a consequence of additional allocations made to the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety since Parliament's approval of estimates in July 2004, the Department has an additional cash requirement in respect of health and social services boards and trusts.

Parliamentary approval for additional cash to finance these services is currently being sought in a supplementary estimate for DHSSPS. Pending that approval urgent cash needs, estimated at £143 million, will be met by repayable advances from the NI Consolidated Fund.

On the 30 November 2004 we published an early summary of administrative data from the pathways to work pilots in helping people claiming incapacity benefits to get back to work. Today I would like to provide a further update on the pilots' performance.

The pathways to work pilots are a major step forward in the reform of incapacity benefits and in the way people with a health condition or disability are helped back to work. Under the pathways pilots Jobcentre Plus and the NHS work positively together to re-focus people on their remaining abilities and their own aspirations for a return to work. The pilots offer all claimants access to:

support from a highly skilled Jobcentre Plus personal adviser offering support and contact especially in the early stages of a claim when people can be most readily helped back to work;

groundbreaking rehabilitation support offered jointly with the NHS in each pilot area so that claimants can be supported to manage and cope with their health condition (e.g. back pain, angina, mental illness) so they can get back to work;

strong local partnerships with the New Deal for Disabled People—voluntary and private sector employment advisers;

a £40 a week return to work credit for a year once they get jobs so that it pays to get back to work;

work with local GPs and employers to ensure people on IB are not discouraged from working again.

The pathways pilots have targeted new IB claimants and existing claimants who volunteer. From last month the mandatory elements of the pathways approach have been tested with some existing claimants.

The latest figures from the pathways to work pilots (including data up to the end of December) continue to be very encouraging. I am placing a copy of the findings in the Library. In particular they show that:

well over 10,000 people have now been placed into work in pathways pilot areas—these numbers include over 2,000 existing claimants for whom participation in this pilot has been entirely voluntary;

the number of recorded job entries for people with a health condition or disability has almost doubled compared with same period last year;

the proportion of people leaving IB for work within six months of a claim starting appears to be significantly higher in pathways than non-pathways areas. Benefit off-flow rates are up to 10 percentage points higher compared to the rest of the country;

performance appears very positive in both Phase 1 (the three areas that started in October 2003) and Phase 2 locations (the four areas that started in April 2004);

between 20 and 25 per cent. of those attending an initial WFI are taking up Jobcentre Plus, New Deal or NHS back to work support. This is around six times higher than the proportions accessing back to work support in the rest of the country. In Jobcentre Plus Pathfinder areas the figures are closer to around 4 per cent. and in the rest of the country 2 per cent.

These continuing, positive findings have formed the backdrop to the announcement made on 2 December 2004 by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer. In the pre-Budget report he announced a plan to expand pathways to work to cover the Jobcentre Plus districts that contained the 30 local authority districts with the greatest proportions of the working age population on incapacity benefits.

The positive response of claimants and advisers and NHS staff to this radical initiative have also firmly shaped the detail of the DWP's five-year strategy and our plans to abolish incapacity benefit for new claimants and replace it with payments that more actively incentivise and support all those with the potential to get back to work to realise their own aspirations for doing so. I aim to publish a Green Paper setting out more details on these proposals in July.