Skip to main content

Written Statements

Volume 432: debated on Wednesday 6 April 2005

Written Ministerial Statements

Wednesday 6 April 2005

Cabinet Office

Members/Peers Correspondence

I am today publishing a report on Departments' and Agencies' performance on handling Members' and Peers' correspondence for 2004. Details are set out in the attached table. Departmental figures are based on substantive replies unless otherwise indicated.

The footnotes to the table provide general background information on how the figures have been compiled.

Correspondence from MPs/Peers to Ministers and agency chief executives(1)

2003 2004

Department or Agency

Target setfor reply(workingdays)

Number oflettersreceived

Percentageof replieswithin target

Target setfor reply(workingdays)

Number oflettersreceived

Percentageof replieswithin target

Cabinet Office

15

443

90

15

637

88

Department for Constitutional Affairs(2)

20

2,746

49

20

3,416

64

Court Service

15

464

95

15

429

95

HM Land Registry

20

48

96

20

44

95

National Archives

15

30

90

15

149

100

10*

34

100

Northern Ireland Court Service

15

14

92

Official Solicitor and Public Trustee

15

17

100

Public Guardianship Office

15

95

88

15

134

93

* Target for correspondence sent direct to Agency Chief Executive.

Crown Prosecution Service

15

298

88

15

520

98

Department for Culture, Media and Sport

18

5,460

85

18

4,817

78

HM Customs and Excise3 4

18

2,040

62

18

1,321

51

Ministry of Defence(3)

15

5,565

76

15

5,989

62

Armed Forces Personnel

15

93

98

15

126

99

Administration Agency

Army Personnel Centre

15

16

94

Defence Estates

15

24

88

15

11

100

Defence Housing Executive

15

14

79

UK Hydrographic Office

15

14

100

Veterans Agency

15

251

94

15

287

99

Warship Support Agency

15

15

91

Department for Education and Skills

15

14,424

92

15

15,313

93

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

15

10,410

68

15

14,305

81

Food Standards Agency

20

981

13

20

782*

59

20

78**

95

* Letters where Health Ministers have replied.

** Letters where Chief Executive/Chairman has replied.

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

20

30,168

80

20

26,942

83

UK Visas(5)

15

16,964

86

15

12,849

45

Department of Health6

20

19,029

54

20

20,140

80

NHS Estates(7)

20

112

73

NHS Pensions Agency

10

63

84

NHS Purchasing and Supplies Agency

20

57

60

Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

10

26

85

10

284

81

Home Office (non IND correspondence)

15 (20 days

37,153

58

15

9,445

76

for IND)

Immigration and Nationality Directorate (IND)(8)

20

35,802

34

Criminal Records Bureau

10

461

92

10

272

95

HM Prison Service(9)

20

1,437

65

20

1,154

73

UK Passport Service

10

337

79

10

486

74

Inland Revenue(3)

18

2,803

81

18

2,993

85

* Local Tax Office delegated figures (where local tax offices have

18

1,795*

35

18

1,601*

4510

replied to direct to MPs)

Valuation Office

18

13

77

18

18

83

Department for International Development

15

3,676

88

15

4,686

80

Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Lord's Office

15

43

88

15

60

87

Legal Secretariat to the Law Officers

15

325

65

15

404

63

Northern Ireland Office

10

503

69

10

567

68

Compensation Agency

7

125

67

Northern Ireland Prison Service

10

44

68

10

48

85

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

15

8,737

73

15

10,135

81

Planning Inspectorate

8

384

89

8

379

81

Office of the Leader of the House of Commons

15

385

96

15

504

95

Scotland Office

15

73

87

15

82

77

Department for Trade and Industry

15

14,678

58

15

11,807

72

Companies House

10

33

100

10

56

98

Employment Tribunals Service(11)

10

61

93

Insolvency Service

10

34

88

10

33

94

Patent Office

10

484

98

10

297

84

Department for Transport

15

10,196

88

15

8,593

86

Driving Standards Agency

15

108

90

15

198

79

DVLA

7

1,028

99

7

1,276

100

Highways Agency

15

263

85

15

285

95

Maritime and Coastguard Agency

10

33

97

10

20

100

Vehicle and Operator Services Agency

15

25

92

15

13

77

HM Treasury(3)

15

4,036

83

15

4,316

86

National Savings and Investments

15

24

70

15

74

92

National Statistics

15

193

84

15

189

95

* Letters where National Statistician replied on Ministers' behalf

10

104*

84

10

133*

73

Treasury Solicitor's Department

10

34

100

10

49

98

Wales Office

15

120

82

15

109

92

Department for Work and Pensions

20

12,157

74

20

13,319

86

Appeals Service

15

84

88

15

50

98

Child Support Agency(12)

20

3,521

87

15

5,390

88

Jobcentre Plus

15

1,052

69

15

1,136

90

The Pension Service

15

1,157

50

15

1,340

89

Disability and Carers Service

15

554

99

15

451

100

Debt Management

15

31

85

15

25

100

Child Benefit Centre

20

11

91

Health and Safety Executive

10

195

91

10

127

70

(1) Departments and agencies which received 10 MPs/Peers letters or less during 2004 are not shown in this table. Holding or interim replies are not included unless otherwise indicated.

(2) Internal restructuring and changes to the correspondence handling system undertaken during second half of 2004. As a result, performance improved to 88 per cent during that period.

(3) Includes all ministerial correspondence.

(4) Downturn in performance due to internal restructuring and changes in the correspondence handling system. Introduction of new system improved performance to 82 per cent in the last quarter of 2004.

(5) Unit is aware of poor performance in 2004 and is taking the necessary measures to improve performance in 2005.

(6) Performance improved to 91 per cent in final quarter of 2004.

(7) Includes eight letters sent directly to agency chief executive, 100 per cent were answered within the 10 working day response target.

(8) IND experienced a 46 per cent increase (a 13 per cent increase in ministerial correspondence) in correspondence in 2004. Difficulties following the roll out of a new correspondence handling system led to significant delays. Necessary measures are being implemented to improve performance in 2005.

(9) Includes a small number of interim replies.

(10) Performance suffered due to exceptionally high volume of complaints received concerning working and child tax credits generally as claimants became familiar with a new system. Further efforts are being made to improve internal correspondence handling systems which will lead to an improvement in performance.

(11) Includes four letters sent directly to agency chief executive, 100 per cent were answered within the 10 working day response target.

(12) Response target reduced from 20 to 15 working days in 2004.

Defence

Sea King Helicopter

I am announcing today the award of a contract to Westland Helicopters Ltd. for phase one of the Sea King Integrated Operational Support Programme, part of the wider Defence Logistics Transformation Programme, which is seeking to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of military logistics support to the front line. The contract is worth £300 million over the first five years, with a price review thereafter, and includes the provision of technical and spares support to the Sea King fleet. It will result in savings of some £50 million over ten years, which is a considerable improvement on current support costs.

There are seven different variants of Sea King currently in service with the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force in a variety of roles including maritime, air sea rescue operations and support to land forces. The Sea King Integrated Operational Support programme will improve the way in which support is provided for the Sea King platform, focusing on maximising aircraft availability, improving spares delivery and reducing through-life costs. It will secure the ability of the Sea King to continue operations in support of the UK Armed Forces in the future.

Phase 2 of the programme is expected to be implemented in around eighteen months' time, subject to a successful performance review against Phase 1 implementation.

Deputy Prime Minister

Houses in Multiple Occupation

The Government are today publishing the summary responses on the key issues raised in our consultation on the implementation of HMO licensing. Copies of these responses have been placed in the Libraries of both Houses. In addition, the Government are announcing the decisions we have made in respect of a number of issues which are necessary to achieve implementation in October 2005. An analysis of responses on the complete range of questions asked will be published in due course.

"Licensing in the Private Rented Sector: Consultation on the Implementation of HMO Licensing" sought to explain the Government's proposals for licensing in the private rented sector, as contained in the Housing Act 2004. It invited interested parties to comment on how these powers should be implemented, in particular through asking questions about the possible form that the necessary items of secondary legislation should take.

The paper asked a series of questions on a number of different subjects, including the following key issues:

the threshold for mandatory licensing,

the property types to be exempted from HMO licensing,

whether to enact management regulations for all HMOs (licensable and non-licensable),

whether to prescribe national amenity standards,

whether to specify a cap for licensing fees.

The consultation period ended in February and we have now analysed responses and reached decisions on these key issues so that we can start drafting the appropriate secondary legislation that will allow these important measures to be commenced by autumn this year. We are also keen that all relevant stakeholders are made aware of these decisions as early as possible to allow them to begin preparing for the introduction of licensing.

On most of these issues, the majority of respondents agreed with the proposals set out in the paper. Discussions have also been held between officials and stakeholders at a working group comprising representatives of local government, landlords and tenants.

The Government are introducing licensing as a measured response to the problems of the private rented sector. And in doing so we are keen to strike the right balance between setting clear national benchmarks and giving local authorities the discretion to respond to local housing market conditions. This is a difficult trade off and there is no single solution that applies in all cases. We propose a mixed solution as follows:

i) the threshold for mandatory licensing will apply to HMOs comprising of three or more storeys and occupied by five or more persons (comprising at least two households);

ii) we will define for these purposes, "storeys" as including basements and attics if they are occupied (including by a resident landlord) or have been converted for occupation or which are in use in connection with the occupation of the HMO. Commercial premises on the ground or any upper floor will also be included in the calculation of number of storeys, but not basements in purely commercial use. We will not specify when a mezzanine floor is to be included, as this will depend on a case by case basis the actual use of such a floor in the HMO e.g. whether or not it used for habitable purposes,

iii) we will not make any rules concerning the calculation of persons for licensing purposes, in effect this means children will be counted from birth in the same way as adults;

iv) student accommodation owned and managed by educational establishments will be exempted from the licensing requirements, on condition that the body has in place an approved code of practice;

v) we will not specify a cap on licence fees at this stage, relying on CBPFA guidance on the treatment of costs and the audit process to ensure that fee levels remain proportionate. Discussion will begin shortly with the landlord associations and local government on ways in which license applications can be processed as quickly as possible, subject to important safeguards;

vi) we will enact management regulations that will apply to all HMOs, whether licensed or not. The regulations will take the form as set out in the consultation paper listed at SectionS;

vii) we will set national minimum amenity standards that will enable authorities to ensure that HMOs are licensed for the requisite number of occupants. We will make a further statement in May which sets out the details of those standards.

viii) we will not set maximum national room sizes for HMOs as we believe the appropriate sizes will depend on the quantity and condition of the often diverse HMO stock in an authority's area as well as the pressure on the rented market.

Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

Parliamentary Database

In order to ensure that we can provide hon. Members with a better service, both in London and when they travel overseas, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office has set up a new database which will enable us to record the foreign affairs issues in which they are interested. We will keep solely factual information which is already in the public domain, for example details of the all party groups and assemblies of which hon. Members are a member, and of overseas and inward visits (eg Inter-Parliamentary Union and Commonwealth Parliamentary Association delegations) in which they have taken part. This should enable us better to tailor information and assistance to hon. Members' needs.

Hon. Members who wish to register an interest in a particular country, region or foreign affairs topic, or to see a copy of their entry in the database, are invited to e-mail to PRDTEnquiries@fco.gov.uk

Barcelona Process

At last November's EuroMed Foreign Ministerial in the Hague, EuroMed Foreign Ministers launched a review of the first 10 years of the Barcelona process and its future direction. A copy of the UK's national contribution to the Barcelona review has been placed in the Library of the House.

We believe that the review provides the opportunity to refocus the priorities of the Barcelona process and help ensure it delivers results that have a real positive impact for EU and Med Partner citizens. We want to see the review generate a real debate among all EuroMed Partners, and in their civil societies, of how to enhance the partnership. We believe that EuroMed should be guided by the principles of the EU's strategic partnership with the Mediterranean and Middle East and the European Neighbourhood Policy, but mostly by the desire of Mediterranean Partners for the EU's engagement and assistance in meeting the challenges of political, social and economic development.

Our national contribution proposes a strategic approach to achieving the vision set out in the 1995 Barcelona declaration. We want to focus EuroMed on achieving a limited number of 10 year targets on governance, education and economic reform. Improved education systems and more vigorous open market competitive economies are crucial to economic growth in EuroMed countries. Without these countries will not be able to take advantage of trade liberalisation and the creation of a EuroMed Free Trade Area by 2010. And improved governance based on democratic institutions, and civil society institutions especially for women and free media, will facilitate the achievement of these targets, as will focused and effective development assistance from the EU.

This is an ambitious agenda, but one whose success is critical to removing the barriers to development in the Middle East and North Africa and to enhancing the relationship between Europe and that region. The review will be negotiated amongst the 35 EuroMed Partners, all of whom will have their own aims and objectives. It will be submitted to Ministers at the EuroMed Foreign Ministerial in May and will constitute the main input to the EuroMed 10th anniversary event, which the UK will host jointly with Spain in November in Barcelona.

Sudan

With the support of Her Majesty's Government, the United Nations Security Council on 29 March 2005 adopted resolution 1591, which extends the Darfur arms embargo to cover all parties to the N'djamena Ceasefire Agreement and any other belligerents in the states of North Darfur, South Darfur and West Darfur.

Resolution 1591 (2005) also imposes an assets freeze and a travel ban, with conditional exemptions, on individuals who impede the peace process, constitue a threat to stability in the Darfur region, commit violations of international humanitarian law or human rights law or other atrocities, violate the arms embargo or are responsible for offensive military overflights in an over the Darfur region. The measures are effective 30 days after the adoption of the resolution, unless the Security Council decides that the parties concerned have complied with their commitments in the peace process and demands made by the Council in this and previous resolutions. Resolution 1591 (2005) also established a UN sanctions committee and a panel of experts to monitor implementation and enforcement of the measures.

Prime Minister

General Election Guidance (Civil Servants)

I have written to ministerial colleagues providing guidance on the conduct of Government business during the election period. Guidance for civil servants on their conduct during this period has also been issued to Departments. The guidance comes into force with immediate effect.

Copies of all the documents have been placed in the Libraries of both Houses and on the Cabinet Office website.