Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 434: debated on Tuesday 24 May 2005

Written Answers to Questions

Tuesday 24 May 2005

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Alpacas

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will seek to introduce a legislative change which will define alpacas as livestock. [184]

I have no plans to introduce a legislative change which will include alpacas to be defined as livestock.

I am unsure of the context of the question but there is some existing legislation which may be relevant to this issue. For example, the Agriculture Act 1947 provides that 'livestock includes any creature kept for the production of food, wool, skins or fur, or for the purpose of its use in the farming of land'. Alpacas could conceivably fall within this definition. Also, the Department issued guidance last year that, for the purposes of the Zoo Licensing Act 1981, alpacas should be considered to be 'domesticated' rather than 'wild' animals.

Antibiotics

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment she has had made of the impact on human health of the use of antibiotics on farms; and if she will make a statement. [692]

There is increasing scientific support for the view that the increase in antimicrobial resistance affecting human health is primarily the result of the use of antibiotics in human rather than veterinary medicines.

Nonetheless, we take this issue very seriously and in June 2000, published a cross-Government strategy to address the issue. In 1999 the Defra Antimicrobial Resistance Co-ordination (DARC) Group was established. Details of the work of this group, together with other information about antimicrobials and links to related websites, are available on the VMD website (www.vmd.gov.uk). We recognise that veterinary medicines, including antimicrobials, are required to ensure healthy food animals in the UK, but we believe that their use should not replace good farm management and animal husbandry systems. We believe that antimicrobials should be used responsibly in food animal production and have issued guidelines in the Code of Practice on the Responsible Use of Animal Medicines on the Farm, produced by the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD). We also support the industry's Responsible Use of Medicines in Agriculture Alliance (RUMA), which has also published responsible use guidelines for antimicrobials that have been adopted by assurance schemes for the five major food-producing species. Also, as a precautionary measure, the use of antimicrobial growth promoters in the EU will be banned from 1 January 2006.

The VMD annually collates and publishes figures on the UK sales of all veterinary antimicrobials. These are likely to reflect usage of antimicrobials in animals. The figures illustrate that, whilst sales of some groups of antimicrobials have increased, others have decreased or remained relatively constant over time. The VMD, in collaboration with the Department of Health, has prepared and published a list of all antimicrobial therapeutic ingredients authorised for use in animals and humans. This illustrates that many antibiotic substances used in human medicine are not used in animals.

A number of research projects designed to provide scientific data to inform further consideration of relevant issues are also underway. These range from investigating the mechanism of antimicrobial resistance transfer in organisms, to investigating the husbandry factors on farms which might lead to reduced antimicrobial usage, thereby reducing the potential for the development of antimicrobial resistance. Details of these projects can be found on the VMD website.

Bridleways and Footpaths

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when she plans to publish her response to the consultation on vehicles on bridleways and footpaths. [147]

In response to the consultation paper on the use of mechanically propelled vehicles on rights of way, 'The Government's framework for action' was published on 20 January, which set out a commitment to legislate and provide new guidance.

The legislative commitment is being delivered through Part 6 of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill, which was introduced to the House on 19 May.

A comprehensive revision of the departmental publication 'Making the Best of Byways' and a new enforcement guidance document will be published this summer.

Brockeridge Farm

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when she expects to make a decision on the exchange of land from common land to access land at Brockeridge Farm, Twyning, Gloucestershire; and if she will make a statement. [690]

The application for an Order of Exchange, made under section 147 of the Inclosure Act 1845, in relation to land at Brockeridge Common, Twyning, Gloucestershire was received by the Department on 2 September 2004. On 17 September officials wrote to the solicitors acting for the applicants seeking further information. A reply was received on 23 May 2005 and the documentation is being scrutinised. The procedures are complex and applications can take some time to determine, so I am not in a position to say if, or when, an Order might be made. The outcome will depend on the Secretary of State being satisfied that the exchange is fair to the parties involved, and its terms just and reasonable.

Climate Change

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the level of (a) carbon dioxide emissions and (b) greenhouse gas emissions has been in the UK in each year since 1990; and what the percentage change was in each case since 1990 in each case. [181818]

The information is as follows:

(a) The following table contains the carbon dioxide emission from 1990 to 2003 expressed as million tonnes of carbon equivalent (MtCeq). The figures are based on the 2005 national inventory report which contains national estimates from 1990 and 2003 inclusive. Percentage changes are shown as a year-on-year change and as a total change from 1990.

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

C0(MtCeq)2 (MtCeq)

165.4

167.2

162.9

159.0

157.0

154.7

160.6

Year-on-year change (percentage)

1.1

-2.5

-2.4

-1.2

-1.5

3.8

Change from 1990 (percentage)

1.1

-1.5

-3.9

-5.1

-6.5

-2.9

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

C0(MtCeq)2 (MtCeq)

153.9

154.5

151.7

152.8

157.4

152.7

156.1

Year-on-year change (percentage)

-4.1

0.4

-1.8

0.7

3.0

-3.0

2.2

Change from 1990 (percentage)

-6.9

-6.5

-8.2

-7.6

-4.8

-7.7

-5.6

(b) Similarly, the following table contains UK greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the same period, weighted together using global warming potentials:

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

GHG (MtCeq)

208.8

210.0

203.5

198.0

195.4

192.9

199.2

Year-on-year change (percentage)

0.6

-3.1

-2.7

-1.3

-1.3

3.3

Change from 1990 (percentage)

0.6

-2.5

-5.2

-6.4

-7.6

-4.6

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

GHG (MtCeq)

192.9

191.3

182.1

181.8

185.0

179.5

181.6

Year-on-year change (percentage)

-3.2

-0.8

-4.8

-0.2

1.8

-3.0

1.2

Change from 1990 (percentage)

-7.6

-8.4

-12.8

-12.9

-11.4

-14.0

-13.0

Fox Hunting

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what plans she has to evaluate the effects of the recent ban on fox hunting. [155]

The Government have no plans to evaluate the effects of the Hunting Act 2005, beyond its normal arrangements for monitoring rural areas.

Fox Hunting Ban

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what plans her Department has to monitor (a) the welfare of the fox, (b) changes in population numbers of urban and rural foxes and (c) effects on rural employment following the ban on hunting of foxes with hounds. [534]

Defra has no plans to institute new arrangements to monitor the welfare or population levels of the rural or urban fox, although it will retain an overview of these issues as part of its general animal welfare responsibilities. Similarly, Defra has no plans to monitor the effects of the Hunting Act 2005 on employment, beyond its normal arrangements for monitoring rural areas

Severn Flood Defences

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when the consultation period being undertaken by the Environment Agency on flood defences on the Tidal Severn will end. [151]

Education and Skills

Adult Learning

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what steps the Government are taking to encourage adults to learn new skills. [314]

On March 22 we published our White Paper setting out our policies and progress in improving adult education and skills-entitled Skills: Getting on in business, getting on at work. Our aim with this White Paper is to help even more adults to get the skills they need to move from welfare into jobs and to progress in their careers. It builds on the infrastructure established through the national Skills Strategy published in 2003. It announced our plans for further improving adult provision, including the roll out of the National Employer Training Programme, the creation of new Skills Academies to deliver training in each sector, the national roll-out of the entitlement to free tuition to NVQ Level 2, and an improved and extended service to deliver advice and guidance on careers, training and support.

Connexions Service

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills which Ministers have had responsibility for the Careers Service and the Connexions Service since May 1997; and if she will make a statement on her plans for the Connexions Service. [740]

Ministers with responsibility for the Careers Service and Connexions Service since May 1997 have been as follows:

Dates

Minister of State

Under Secretary

of State

May 1997-July 1998

Tessa Blackstone

Kim Howells

July 1998-July 1999

Tessa Blackstone

George Mudie

July 1999-June 2001

Tessa Blackstone

Malcolm Wicks

June 2001-June 2002

Margaret Hodge

Ivan Lewis

June-December 2002

Margaret Hodge

Stephen Twigg

December 2002-June 2003

Margaret Hodge

Ivan Lewis

June 2003-May 2005

Margaret Hodge only

May 2005-present

Beverley Hughes

Maria Eagle

Proposals for Connexions and the delivery of services for 13 to 19-year-olds will be set out in the Youth Green Paper which we intend to publish in due course.

Education Maintenance Allowance

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what estimate she has made of the cost of extending education maintenance allowances to all students who remain in post-16 education. [275]

The following tables show the estimated take up and cost of education maintenance allowances (EMAs). Estimates in Table One are based on the current scheme and the household income thresholds that apply in 2004–05. The second table gives estimates for all 16 to 18-year-olds in post-16 further education and assumes that all are eligible for £30 EMA per week plus bonuses. The tables also take account of drop-out from the scheme.

Estimated take-up and cost of EMA for eligible 16 to 18-year-olds in England

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

2008/09

Take-up

303,300

409,800

442,100

437,200

427,300

Cost

Financial year

253

375

436

443

438

Academic year

297

414

446

442

436

Estimated take-up and cost of EMA assuming all 16 to 18-year-olds in post-16 further education receive the maximum payment of £30 per week

2004/05

2005/06

2006/07

2007/08

2008/09

Take-up

565,000

807,100

898,400

910,400

916,100

Cost

Financial year

526

852

1,032

1,079

1,088

Academic year

643

957

1,069

1,083

1,091

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what her estimate is of Government spending on the education maintenance allowance projected for each year from 2004–05 to 2009–10; and if she will make a statement. [823]

The following table shows the estimated take up and cost of education maintenance allowances (EMAs) for young people in post 16 further education, projected for each year from 2004–05 to 2008–09. Estimates for 2009–10 are not currently available. These estimates are based on the current scheme and the household income thresholds that apply in 2004–05. The table also takes account of drop-out from the scheme.

Estimated take-up and cost of EMA for eligible 16 to 18-year-olds in England

Cost (£ million)

Take-up (Number)

Financial

year(1)

Academic year(2)

2004/05

303,300

253

297

2005/06

409,800

375

414

2006/07

442,100

436

446

2007/08

437,200

443

442

2008/09

427,300

438

436

Free School Meals

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what restrictions are applicable to the choice of (a) food and (b) drinks for children in receipt of free school meals. [214]

Since 2001 all school lunches must comply with statutory nutritional standards. Subject to these standards, the contents of individual school meals is a matter for either school governing bodies or local education authorities, depending on whether or not funding has been delegated to schools. DfES has published Healthy School Lunch guidance in which the Secretary of State strongly recommends that the value of a free school meal should be set to enable eligible children to have a standard two course lunch and drink. Schools are strongly encouraged to provide drinking water free of charge. Pupils entitled to free school meals cannot substitute other school food such as breakfast or break-time snacks for food served at lunchtime.

School Truancy

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the truancy levels were in schools in (a) Gloucestershire and (b) England in each year since 1995. [116]

The information requested is as follows:

Percentage of half days missed due to unauthorised absences for schools in Gloucestershire and England

Gloucestershire England

Academic year

Primary

Secondary

Primary

Secondary

1994/95

0.3

0.4

0.5

1.0

1995/96

0.3

0.4

0.5

1.0

1996/97

0.3

0.3

0.5

1.0

1997/98

0.3

0.3

0.5

1.1

1998/99

0.3

0.4

0.5

1.1

1999/2000

0.3

0.5

0.5

1.0

2000/01

0.2

0.5

0.5

1.1

2001/02

0.2

0.5

0.5

1.1

2002/03(1)

0.24

0.51

0.43

1.07

2003/04(1)

0.23

0.56

0.41

1.14

(1) Figures have only been published to two decimal places since 2003.

Trade and Industry

Coal Health Claims

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much had been paid to the Union of Democratic Mineworkers in respect of handling fees for coal health claims up to 31 March. [276]

As at 31 March 2005, the total paid to UDM solicitors for fees under the schemes was £19 million.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much had been paid to solicitors in respect of legal fees for coal health claims up to 31 March; and how much had been paid to each of the top 20 firms of solicitors. [277]

As of 31 March 2005, the total paid in solicitors for fees under the scheme was £493.5 million. The 20 highest paid solicitors under the scheme as at 31 March 2005 were:

Solicitor

Total solicitors costs (£ million)

Thompsons

66.6

Hugh James Ford Simey

54.5

Raleys Solicitors

43.8

Browell Smith and Co

31.2

Mark Gilbert Morse

28.3

Beresfords Solicitors

27.2

Union Of Democratic Mineworkers

19.0

Graysons

18.3

Watson Burton

16.3

Towells Solicitors

12.2

Moss Solicitors

10.2

Irwin Mitchell

9.9

Randell Lloyd Jenkins and Martin

8.9

The Legal Warehouse

7.2

Conies

6.8

Kidd and Spoor Harper Solicitors

6.8

AMSLaw

6.4

O H Parsons

6.4

Wake Smith

5.6

Ingrams Solicitors

5.5

E-mail

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will estimate the proportion of the adult population in (a) the UK, (b) the South West and (c) South Gloucestershire that had domestic access to e-mail (i) in the latest year for which estimates are available and (ii) five years earlier. [644]

The Office for National Statistics does not produce figures for home adult email access but they do produce household Internet access figures, which are quoted as follows.

The percentage of households able to access the Internet from home in Q4 2004 were:

(i)(a) 52 per cent. for the whole of the UK

(b) 50 per cent. for the South West

(c) Unknown

The percentage of households able to access the Internet from home in Q4 1999 were:

(ii)(a) 20 per cent. for the whole of the UK

(b) 19 per cent. for the South West

(c) Unknown

Nuclear Industry

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions the Department has had with (a) the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority and (b) BNFL in respect of the future operation of the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) following the leakage of radioactively contaminated nitric acid at THORP in April. [837]

DTI officials have had a number of discussions with both the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) and British Nuclear Group (BNG) concerning the leak at THORP that resulted in the plant being closed. With regard to the future operation of THORP, the NDA and regulators are still looking at how best to proceed. We will wait for their advice before taking a decision on the way forward.

Gas

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the impact on UK businesses of the increase in wholesale gas prices and the increase in energy costs, with specific reference to the terms of (a) productivity and (b) competitiveness. [45]

The impact on UK businesses of increases in gas and energy prices will depend on a variety of factors, including how much gas or energy a particular company uses, the degree of their exposure to spot and forward prices and the duration of high prices. It will also be affected by the energy prices paid by their competitors. A further sector-specific issue is whether they are in a competitive market where international trade sets the price or in a sector where prices are determined more locally and rising energy costs could be passed on.

Despite recent rises, UK gas and electricity prices for industrial users in 2004 were lower in real terms than they were in 1994. In January 2005, UK gas and electricity prices for small, medium and large energy users were still below the EU median; for extra large electricity users their electricity prices were at the level of the EU median. However, individual companies will have agreed commercially confidential contract terms and prices which might differ from these averages.

Data on the average industrial gas and electricity prices in the UK over time can be found in tables 3.3.1 Real Terms and 3.3.2 Real Terms at:

www.dti.gov.uk/energy/inform/energy_prices/tables/table_331.xls

Average gas price comparisons for different size categories of energy users across the EU can be found in tables 5.8.1, 5.8.2 and 5.8.3 at:

www.dti.gov.uk/energy/inform/energy_prices/tables/table_581.xls and for electricity prices in tables 5.4.1, 5.4.2, 5.4.3 and 5.4.4 at:

www.dti.gov.uk/energy/inform/energy_prices/tables/table_541.xls

There is anecdotal evidence that, for very large users of gas, gas prices in the UK are above those on the Continent. The Department is in discussion with the Energy Intensive Users Group and other industrial stakeholders to develop ideas for improving the operation of the forward market and to identify ways users can mitigate the effects of high forward gas prices. On 16 May the DTI held a seminar with major users to discuss forward gas prices and we are planning a further similar seminar with smaller users. We have undertaken research into the operation of the forward gas market. The report by independent consultants Global Insight can be found at http://www.dti.gov.uk/energy/publications/policy/index.shtml

Miners' Compensation Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made since 1 April of the merits of asking the Serious Fraud Squad to investigate solicitors who have doubled-charged clients claiming under the coalminers' compensation scheme. [165]

The regulation of solicitors is a matter for the Law Society. The Department continues to work closely with them on the issue of double charging.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry which solicitors are refusing to agree his Department's proposed scheme of £500 minimum compensation for successful claims for miners' industrial disease. [167]

holding answer 23 May 2005

The £500 minimum payment is a proposal from the Claimants' Group of solicitors. A revised minimum payments proposal has recently been received and is under discussion between the parties. The Department has not yet been formally notified of any solicitors' refusal to agree to this proposal.

Veterinary Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions he has had with the British Veterinary Association on the proposed legislation to abolish free prescriptions for veterinary purposes. [153]

In my capacity as Minister with responsibility for competition, I met the British Veterinary Association to discuss the Competition Commission recommendations on prescription-only veterinary medicines on 18 September 2003. The draft legislation recently published proposes to implement their recommendation that prescriptions should be free for three years. Currently there is no requirement for free veterinary prescriptions.

Working Time Directive

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the implications for the working arrangements of hon. Members of the proposed changes to the rights of UK workers to opt out of the Working Time Directive; and if he will make a statement. [643]

The Working Time proposals are still under negotiation; any changes must be agreed by both the European Parliament and European Council.

The Government are therefore not yet in a position to assess their impact. I will of course, submit a full Regulatory Impact Assessment when the final proposals are clear.

House of Commons Commission

Electricity Green Tariff

To ask the hon. Member for Middlesbrough, representing the House of Commons Commission whether the House purchases electricity on a green tariff. [402]

11 per cent. of the electricity purchased for the parliamentary estate is from renewable sources.

Leader of the House

Select Committees

To ask the Leader of the House if he will bring forward proposals during 2005 to combine the functions of the Procedure Committee and the former Select Committee on the Modernisation of the House of Commons in one new select committee. [180]

Culture, Media and Sport

Licensing Changes

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what discussions she has had with representatives of sports clubs which run small bars as ancillary businesses about the impact on those bars of the recent changes in licensing fees; and if she will make a statement. [695]

The concerns of amateur sports clubs were debated in detail before the Licensing Act 2003 was passed. My Department held a number of meetings with the Central Council of Physical Recreation to discuss the effects of the Act on sports clubs with bars, and these discussions will continue as implementation proceeds.

In introducing the new licensing regime, the Government have no intention of penalising those involved in running clubs, nor to affect the important roles such clubs play in local communities. The situation will remain under review, and my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has made a commitment to an independent review of fee levels and associated costs, within a reasonable period after the new framework is fully introduced. The review will consider the concerns of sports clubs, and its results will inform any necessary adjustments to the levels of fees introduced under the Act.

National Sports Foundation

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport whether it is her policy that the creation of the National Sports Foundation should not have any impact on the amount of money directed to sport through the National Lottery. [683]

In establishing the National Sports Foundation, we have no intention of reducing the amount of money spent on sport.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how the interests of (a) the Football Association, the Rugby Football Union, the England and Wales Cricket Board and the Lawn Tennis Association, (b) the Central Council for Physical Recreation and (c) other sports national governing bodies will be represented at the National Sports Foundation. [684]

Discussions on how the interests of the sport national governing bodies will be represented at the National Sports Foundation are at an early stage. Further details will be announced in due course.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what criteria will be used to assess grant applications to the National Sports Foundation. [685]

Discussions on what criteria will be used to assess grant applications to the National Sports Foundation are at an early stage and decisions will be taken in due course.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport where the offices of the National Sports Foundation will be located; how it will be organised; and how many people she expects that it will employ. [686]

Discussions on where the National Sports Foundation will be located, its structure and its staffing levels are at an early stage and decisions will be taken in due course.

Northern Ireland

Sex Offenders

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many registered sex offenders are living in each housing executive district in Northern Ireland; how many of these have been relocated from other parts of the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement. [345]

As of 23 May there were 561 offenders living in the community who are subject to the notification requirements of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. This means they are required to notify the police of certain personal details, including their home address. The information is not available broken down by housing executive district or by jurisdictional origin.

Work and Pensions

Social Fund Community Care Grants

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will estimate the level of additional funding required for the Social Fund Community Care Grant scheme to ensure that all high and medium priority claims are met. [650]

holding answer 23 May 2005

The information is not available in the format requested.

However, for 2004–05 we estimate that the amount of extra funding that would have been required to meet all high, medium and low priority needs is £204 million.

Defence

Personnel Deployments

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether British service personnel have been deployed or seconded to (a) Guantanamo Bay, (b) Guam and (c) Diego Garcia since 1995. [241]

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether British service personnel have been (a) deployed and (b) seconded to (i) Guantanamo Bay, (ii) Guam and (iii) Diego Garcia since 1994. [506]

No British service personnel have been deployed operationally or seconded to other nations' armed forces to serve at Guantanamo Bay or Guam. The armed forces maintain a permanent presence on Diego Garcia, totalling some 40 service personnel.

Redundant Infantry Regiments

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will estimate how many personnel will move from the future redundant infantry regiments to fill the future establishment figures for (a) The Royal Engineers, (b) The Royal Logistic Corps and (c) The Intelligence Corps. [394]

As the hon. Member is aware, the progress towards a lasting settlement in Northern Ireland means that we are able to reduce the Infantry by four battalions. The 2,500 posts that will be freed-up as a result will be reinvested across the Army in order to produce more robust establishments and strengthen those trades critical to a sustainable expeditionary capability. In terms of those Arms and Services listed by the hon. Member, they will be strengthened by the numbers shown in the following table. She should note, however, that these figures are subject to future refinement.

Arm/service

Posts reallocated from

infantry battalion reductions

Royal Engineers

+456

Royal Logistic Corps

+285

Intelligence Corps

+113

Regimental Uniforms

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence who meets the cost of the new uniforms and mess-dress of existing personnel up to the date of changeover for the future (a) Mercia, (b) Yorkshire and (c) Scottish regiments. [392]

Officers receive an initial outfit allowance to fund their first purchase of uniform and mess dress. Thereafter, a tax-free allowance is provided to enable them to maintain their uniform and dress. Soldiers' uniform is provided by the public purse.

While much of the existing uniform may be used up until such time as it requires replacement, those elements deemed essential on transition (such as cap badges and buttons) will be provided from public funds.

Re-roling

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence which infantry regiments and battalions have re-roled in the last six years; and what the duration was of re-roling. [391]

Data on the re-roling of Infantry Battalions before January 2000 is not held centrally and can be provided only at disproportionate cost. I can, however, provide detail of all Infantry re-roling (whereby Infantry Battalions change role) from January 2000 to May 2005 inclusive.

Battalions re-roled to Armoured Infantry role January 2000-May 2005

Date (a)

Unit (b)

Length of re-role period (approx. months) (e)

March 2000

1st Battalion The Duke of Wellington's Regiment (West Riding)

6

August 2000

1st Battalion The Black Watch (The Highland Regiment)

6

March 2001

1st Battalion The Kings Regiment

6

March 2001

1st Battalion The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers

6

April 2002

1st Battalion The Light Infantry

6

September 2003

1st Battalion The Scots Guards

6

March 2004

1st Battalion The Highlanders (Seaforth, Gordons and Camerons)

6

Battalions re-roled to Mechanised Infantry role January 2000-May 2005

Date (a)

Unit (b)

Length of re-role period (approx. months) (e)

March 2001

1st Battalion The Kings Own Scottish Borderers

3

April 2001

1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment

3

February 2002

1st Battalion The Cheshire Regiment

3

August 2002

1st Battalion The Royal Welsh Fusiliers

3

May 2003

1st Battalion The Coldstream Guards

3

March 2004

1st Battalion The Devonshire and Dorset Regiment

3

Battalions re-roled to Air Assault role January 2000-May 2005

Date (a)

Unit (b)

Length of re-role period (approx. months) (e)

September 2003

1st Battalion The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders (Princess Louise's)

3

Battalions re-roled to a Light role (from Mechanised, Armoured Infantry or Air Assault January 2000-May 2005

Date (a)

Unit (b)

(c) Length of re-role

(approx. months)

March 2000

1st Battalion The Devonshire and Dorset Regiment

1

March 2001

1st Battalion The Highlanders (Seaforth, Gordons and Camerons)

1

April 2001

1st Battalion The Kings Own Royal Border Regiment

1

April 2001

2nd Battalion The Royal Regiment of Fusiliers

1

April 2002

1st Battalion The Green Howards (Alexandra, Princess of Wales's Own Yorkshire Regiment)

1

May 2003

1st Battalion The Welsh Guards

1

September 2003

1st Battalion The Irish Guards

1

September 2003

1st Battalion The Royal Irish Regiment (27th (Inniskilling), 83rd, 87th and The Ulster Defence Regiment)

1

January 2004

1st Battalion The Kings Own Scottish Borderers

1

March 2004

1st Battalion The Queens Lancashire Regiment

1

Service Personnel (General Election)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will instigate a survey of all service personnel to discover how many were (a) registered to vote and (b) able to vote by post or other means in the General Election on 5 May. [693]

We are considering with the Electoral Commission a number of initiatives relating to service voting, including the conduct of research on levels of service voter registration. The exercise of a vote is however an entirely private matter, but we are examining whether there are any ways in which we could make it easier for service personnel to vote.

Siege of Kut

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether he plans to commemorate the 90th anniversary of the siege of Kut-el-Amara from December 1915 to April 1916. [533]

The Government does not have any plans to commemorate the 90th anniversary of the siege of Kut-el-Amara. The siege was a costly defeat for the allies and both the British Army and the British Indian Army lost many brave men in the siege and the attempts to relieve the besieged garrison and we honour their memory.

Spearhead Land Element

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence which regiment or battalion comprises the future Spearhead Land Element (SLE); whether it is presently fully equipped; whether the present SLE is deployed; and when the future SLE will take over from the present SLE. [384]

The 1st Battalion The Royal Green Jackets are currently undertaking the role of the Spearhead Land Element and they are not deployed at present. It is planned that the 1st Battalion The Green Howards will assume the role of SLE in July 2005 and I can confirm that both battalions are fully equipped to undertake this task.

Territorial Army

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has for the required commitment of Territorial Army personnel deployment; and if he will make a statement. [393]

Future Army Structures will integrate further the Territorial Army (TA) with the Regular Army, ensuring a more relevant, capable and useable TA. There will be some adjustments to their capabilities to meet new requirements and to best support the Regular Army on operations. Work is continuing on these issues and an announcement will be made in due course.

Trafalgar Day

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what arrangements will be made for UK service personnel overseas to celebrate Trafalgar Day. [292]

The annual commemoration of the Battle of Trafalgar is primarily a concern for the Royal Navy with ships and establishments, both in the UK and overseas, traditionally holding mess dinners on 21 October to honour the Immortal Memory of Nelson and all those who fought at the Battle of Trafalgar. Requests have also been received from a number of our embassies for senior naval officers to attend dinners, which are currently under consideration.

A programme of events is planned to take place in Gibraltar during the weekend of 28 to 30 October 2005. These include a Nelson exhibition, Beating the Retreat and reception, and a Royal Navy Ceremonial Guard Mount at His Excellency the Governor's residence. The Royal Navy will also be invited to exercise their Freedom of the City privileges.

UK Personnel (Balkans)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the effects of the declarations to the Joint Forces Agreement in Bosnia involving Morocco, OJ L34 of 8 February on the liability of UK personnel serving in the Balkans, with particular reference to culpability; and if he will make a statement. [499]

The declarations attached to the Agreement between the EU and the Kingdom of Morocco on the participation of Morocco in the EU operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina has no effect on the liability of UK personnel serving in the Balkans. The declarations place the Kingdom of Morocco on the same footing as the other troop contributing nations with regard to reciprocal waiver of claims arising out of the deployment of their forces.

War Disablement Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence why people who enlisted in the armed services during the second world war and who worked in mining and other industries, known as the Bevin Boys, are not eligible for war disablement pensions when suffering illness or disablement as a consequence of that service. [548]

While Bevin Boys were called up and allotted National Service Registration Numbers, they were not enlisted or conscripted into HM Armed Forces. They remained civilians, mobilised to perform essential works. This being so, any illness or disablement suffered as a consequence would not have arisen as a direct result of enemy action and therefore would not fall for consideration as a war injury under the war pension scheme.

Transport

Trunk Road Closures (Compensation)

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will introduce compensation payments for traders affected by trunk road closures. [435]

Climate Change

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what steps he is taking to reduce the impact of transport on climate change. [436]

We published a summary of the main measures in the December 2004 consultation paper on the Review of the UK's Climate Change Programme. As part of the Review, we are considering the scope for additional measures to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases from all sectors, including transport.

Free Bus Travel

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what estimate he has made of the number of elderly and disabled people who will be entitled to free off-peak bus travel in 2006–07. [437]

From April 2006, people aged 60 and over and disabled people will be entitled to free off-peak travel on their local bus services in England. This will benefit around 11 million people.

Aviation Policy

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what discussions he has had with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs regarding aviation policy and its impact on climate change. [427]

Railways (Punctuality)

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on punctuality levels on the railways (a) in the most recent period for which figures are available and (b) in 1997. [438]

The moving annual average of the Public Performance Measure (PPM) for rail punctuality at 31 December 2004 was 82.8 per cent. For the year to March 1998 the moving annual average was 89.7 per cent.

Greater Manchester

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on his plans for public transport in Greater Manchester. [439]

Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive is responsible for transport planning in Greater Manchester. They are required to submit their provisional five-year Local Transport Plan in July and final LTP in March 2006.

Aircraft Emissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what plans the Government have to tackle aircraft emissions. [451]

holding answer 23 May 2005

The Government's plans to tackle aircraft emissions are set out in "The Future of Air Transport" White Paper (Cm 6046).

Airline Tickets (Financial Protection)

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what steps the Department has taken to publicise exclusions to airline ticket protection provided through credit card booking; and if he will bring forward legislation to improve financial protection for UK air travellers. [834]

The Department has not publicised exclusions to airline ticket protection provided through credit card booking.

The Department has asked the Civil Aviation Authority to consider a range of options for the future financial protection of air travellers and will make a decision on receipt of further advice from the Authority.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the financial protection scheme for air travellers. [835]

The Air Travel Organisers' Licensing scheme (ATOL) provides financial protection for people buying package holidays. There is currently no statutory protection for people who buy air travel that is not part of a package.

The growth in popularity of no-frills air travel has meant the proportion of holidaymakers protected by the ATOL scheme has gone down. Together with the Civil Aviation Authority we are considering a range of options in relation to this decline.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the Civil Aviation Authority's estimate of the number of UK leisure passengers who flew without financial protection in 2004; if he will bring forward measures to address the gap in financial protection for air travellers; and if he will make a statement. [836]

In July 2004 the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) provided advice to the Government on the current financial protection arrangements for holidaymakers. In response, the Government asked the Authority to carry out further work on a range of options, including an assessment of the likely regulatory impacts. We will decide on next steps upon analysis of the CAA's further advice.

Civil Aviation Authority Study

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he will publish his response to the Civil Aviation Authority fifth freedoms study. [181]

The Civil Aviation Authority completed its consultation on this study on 13 May, and we expect that it will submit the final version of the study to the Department shortly. The response will follow in due course after we have carefully considered the content of the study.

Crossrail

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what (a) priority and (b) funding his Department has committed to Crossrail. [433]

The Department attaches a very high priority to Crossrail. That is why we introduced a hybrid Bill for the project in February 2005, and reintroduced it on 18 May.

The Government remain equally committed to finding an equitable funding package for Crossrail. We will bring forward funding proposals during the passage of the Bill.

M1 Motorway

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport for what reason the fencing being erected north of junction 11 alongside the southbound carriageways of the M1 motorway are not being set back to allow for future planned widening to take place. [179]

While the Government have announced their intention to widen the M1 in this area, the plans are still at an early stage, requiring land outside the current boundary.

The fencing at junction 11 is being erected inside the highway boundary to give the residents of Luton relief from severe noise problems. The construction of the fence allows the infill panel to be re-used at a later date, should the widening scheme proceed.

Motorbike Noise

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement on maximum noise levels from motor-powered two-wheeled vehicles. [688]

Under the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 and the Motor Cycles etc. (EC Type Approval) Regulations 1999, motor powered two wheeled vehicles must be constructed to meet the following maximum noise levels (dB(A)) when subjected to a drive-by noise test.

Date of first use

Mopeds

Motor cycles

Pre 1 April 1983

No requirement

No requirement

1 April 1983 to

1/2

Up to 80cc=79dB(A)

81–125cc=81dB(A)

31 March 1991

74dB(A)

126–350cc=84dB(A)

1/2

351–500cc=86dB(A)

Over 500cc=87dB(A)

1 April 1991 to

Up to 80cc=78dB(A)

16 June 2003

75dB(A)

81–175cc=80dB(A)

Over 175cc=83dB(A)

Up to 25km/h=66dB(A)

Up to 80cc=75dB(A)

From 17 June 2003

Over 25km/h=71dB(A)

81–175cc=77dB(A)

Over 175cc=80dB(A)

Measures are also in place to ensure that these standards are maintained as far as possible in service by ensuring that inappropriate after-market/replacement silencers that would make motorcycles significantly noisier should not be sold or fitted and by enforcement of such measures at MOT, at the roadside and at point of sale.

New Road Routes

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list areas where studies are being undertaken on sites of (a) historical, (b) environmental and (c) archaeological importance that are being considered as possible new motorway and trunk road routes. [467]

holding answer 23 May 2005

The Highways Agency undertakes environmental impact assessment studies for all proposed new motorway and all-purpose trunk road schemes. All sites of historical, environmental and archaeological importance that may be affected by route options will be subject to an appropriate level of assessment. The areas where these assessment studies are being undertaken are those associated with the Targeted Programme of Improvements listed at Appendix 5 in the Highways Agency's Business Plan 2005–06 which is available in the House of Commons Library.

Road Construction Costs

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the average cost is of constructing a mile of (a) motorway and (b) trunk road. [464]

The average cost of building one mile of new(a) motorway: £23 million per mile (b) Dual lane carriageway: £12 million per mile. In considering the cost of a new road there is a vast array of variables, not least the difference between urban or rural areas, new route or existing network. Factors such as quality of land, site geology, drainage, environmental mitigation, traffic management or restricted access can all have a large impact on cost.

Road Tolls

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what plans he has to introduce (a) further toll motorways and (b) tolls on other major roads. [450]

holding answer 23 May 2005

Last summer's consultation exercise, "M6: giving motorists a choice" sought views on whether the Department should develop the option of an M6 Expressway between Birmingham and Manchester as an alternative to the current option to widen the M6 between junctions 11a and 19. The Government are considering the response to the consultation and will respond in due course.

The Government are introducing a Lorry Road User Charge (LRUC) to ensure that all hauliers, regardless of nationality, pay their fair share towards the costs they impose in the UK. Responsibility for implementing LRUC has been laid to HM Revenue and Customs.

In line with their manifesto commitment, the Government are examining the potential of moving away from the current system of motoring taxation towards a national system of road pricing.

Cabinet Office

E-government

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster if he will take steps to provide a single point for citizens to register change of details with all Government agencies through the e-government system. [445]

The Cabinet Office offered an online 'change of address' service for Government some years ago. The service was not popular and was discontinued.

However much has changed in the way people use online services since then and the underlying principle that responsible citizens should only have to tell us changes once is a good one.

We shall explore that in the Cabinet Office led work on service delivery within the "Connecting the UK: the Digital Strategy" initiative announced in March.

E-democracy

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what part the Strategy Unit has played in advancing e-democracy. [446]

The Strategy Unit has not undertaken any work on e-democracy. The e-Government Unit in the Cabinet Office was taking this work forward, however, responsibility has now transferred to the Department for Constitutional Affairs.

Better Regulation Task Force

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what plans he has for ensuring that the Better Regulation Task Force becomes more effective. [447]

The Better Regulation Task Force is already an extremely effective champion of better regulation and we have made a commitment to build on this further.

We plan to put the Task Force on a permanent footing and give it additional responsibilities, including providing independent scrutiny of departmental plans for simplification, in becoming the Better Regulation Commission.

Civil Servants

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster if he will list civil servants seconded to European Union (a) institutions and (b) working committees, broken down by post occupied; and what the appointment criteria were in each case. [494]

118 UK civil servants are seconded to the European institutions as "Seconded National Experts" as at 23 May 2005. This figure is subject to change. The distribution of these secondees in the European Union is shown in the following table.

Selection by the institution is generally on the basis of presentation of a curriculum vitae for each candidate, usually followed by interviews, based on the requirements of each vacancy. UK Departments will submit details of only those civil servants whom they consider suitable for the posts and who will enhance their expertise during the secondment to the longer-term benefit of the Department or civil service as a whole.

At any time a further 10 to 14 UK civil servants are on short-term traineeships ("stages") to the European Commission. Other UK civil servants may visit the Commission for short-term work experience visits but these would not be centrally recorded.

The majority of UK staff who sit on Council or Commission working groups or management committees are serving UK civil servants, employed in the UK permanent representation to the European Union in Brussels or working in UK Departments and travelling to Brussels or Luxembourg for meetings.

Institution/area of work or Directorate-General

Number of secondees

European Commission

DG Agriculture and Rural Development

2

DG Competition

5

DG Development

5

Humanitarian Aid Office

1

DG Economic and Financial Affairs

5

DG Education and Culture

2

DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities

7

DG Transport and Energy

6

DG Enlargement

2

DG Enterprise and Energy

3

DG Environment

6

EuropeAid(Co-operation Office

4

Eurostat

3

DG External Relations

10

DG Fisheries and Maritime Affairs

1

DG Health and Consumer Protection

8

DG Information Society and Media

1

DG Internal Market and Services

8

Joint Research Centre

2

DG Justice Freedom and Security

4

Legal Service

1

DG Personnel and Administration

1

DG Regional Policy

3

DG Research

3

DG Taxation and Customs Union

7

DG Trade

7

Secretariat General

1

European Commission total

108

Council of Ministers

General Secretariat

1

Data Protection Secretariat

1

Private Office

1

External Economic Relations

1

CUEMC(Euro Military Staff Council Secretariat

1

Council of Ministers total

5

European Maritime Safety Agency

3

European Parliament/Budgetary Control Committee

1

European Parliament/Internal Policies

1

Overall total

118

Interchange Scheme

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what assessment he has made of the operation of the Interchange scheme for providing broader work experience for local government staff. [80]

I have been asked to reply.

Interchange opportunities between staff in local and central Government are arranged by individual Departments.

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister currently has 10 members of staff on secondment to local authorities and 26 local authority staff working in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister on secondment in areas including Housing, Homelessness, Social Exclusion, Local Government Legislation, Urban Policy Unit, and Local Government Strategy Unit. Such opportunities provide useful development and training opportunities for individuals to develop new skills and new ways of working and for organisations to benefit from the exchange of new ideas and ways of working. An evaluation process is in place to assess the benefits of each secondment.

It is however for the local authorities to develop their own interchange policy and make decisions on the number of their staff they can release on secondments. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has no input into these policies.

Ministerial Fleet

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many vehicles there are in the ministerial fleet, broken down by type; how many have a chauffeur; what greener fuel alternatives have been studied; and what the running costs of the fleet were in each of the last five years. [455]

The responsibility for the provision of ministerial cars and drivers has been delegated under the terms of the Framework Document to the Government Car Despatch Agency. I have asked its Chief Executive Mr. Roy Burke to write to the hon. Member. Copies of his letter will be placed in the Library.

Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he will reply to the letters from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to (a) Mehwish Saeed, dated 7 March, (b) Mrs Z. Kanum, dated 3 March and (c) Mr. M R Sufi, dated 7 February. [190]

My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary replied to my right hon. Friend's letters with regard to Mehwish Saeed and Mrs. Z Kanum on 15 March and 14 March respectively.

My right hon. Friend will reply to my right hon. Friend's letter with regard to Mr. M R Sufi shortly.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he will reply to the letter from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton dated 3 March with regard to the Manchester Muslim Funeral Committee. [194]

We have no record of having received this letter. UKvisas has requested a copy from the office of my right hon. Friend. My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary will reply to him as soon as possible, once a copy of the letter is received.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he will reply to the letters from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to (a) Mrs. K. Akhtar, dated 30 March, (b) Hina Khalid, dated 20 January and (c) Mr. T. Iqbal, dated 18 January. [195]

My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary replied to my right hon. Friend's letters on 14 April, 1 April and 6 April respectively.

Egypt

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps he is taking to support the development of democratic elections in Egypt. [77]

We fully support the development of democratic elections in Egypt and welcome President Mubarak's proposal on 28 February to change the Egyptian constitution, with the stated aim of enabling direct election of the President from multiple candidates. On 12 May, the People's Assembly voted in favour of the amendment.

The UK, through our Embassy in Cairo, works closely with Egypt to promote political reform including, for example, through training on election reporting in the media. We are also encouraging the European Union to focus more on supporting democracy, governance and human rights in Egypt.

Guantanamo Bay

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations he has made to the US authorities in relation to (a) prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay having access to people and texts appropriate to their faith and (b) the appropriate treatment of religious representatives and texts at Guantanamo Bay. [57]

We have expressed our concern to the US authorities about the conditions of detention at Guantanamo Bay on many occasions. British officials conducting welfare visits to the British detainees made inquiries about the detainees' freedom to practise their religion.

We understand that detainees are given copies of the Koran, prayer mats and Halal food, and that prayer calls are made throughout the camp.

India

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he next plans to visit India. [380]

My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary hopes to visit India again before long. As is normal practice, his next visit will not be announced until the dates for it are firm.

Lebanon

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what monitoring the UK has undertaken (a) directly and (b) through the UN of the impact of the withdrawal of Syrian forces from the Lebanon. [331]

Our Embassies in Beirut and Damascus are observing the extent and impact of the withdrawal of Syrian forces from Lebanon.

The UK has supported the decision of the United Nations Secretary General to deploy a UN mission made up of military experts to verify whether there has been a full and complete withdrawal of all Syrian troops and military assets and intelligence apparatus from Lebanon. We are pleased to have seconded a British Army Colonel to act as second-in-command of this mission. We understand that the mission will be producing its report later this month.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on recent Israeli attacks on Lebanese border villages. [332]

We are aware of a number of exchanges of fire on the Blue Line earlier this month. We understand that during these exchanges of fire, some Israeli artillery landed on the Lebanese side of the Blue Line, although Lebanese villages were not hit. On 13 May the Israeli Defence Force attacked Hizballah positions in southern Lebanon following a missile attack from Lebanon on the northern Israeli town of Shlomi and mortar and missile attacks on the area of Har Dov/Sheba'a Farms. We understand that the missile and mortar attacks were in response to Israeli overflights of Lebanese territory.

We are concerned about these infringements of the Blue Line and welcome the statements by the United Nations Secretary General on 10, 13 and 16 May expressing his own concern and calling for all parties to show restraint. We reiterate those sentiments and call on all parties to abide by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1310 and other relevant UN resolutions. In this sensitive political time in Lebanon it is irresponsible for any party to heighten tension along the Blue Line.

MI6 (Decision Notification)

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs under what circumstances MI6 may decide that major decisions it takes need not be communicated to him; and what mechanism exists to ensure such decisions are in the public interest. [509]

The Intelligence Services Act 1994 requires the explicit authority of the Secretary of State in respect of a wide range of major operations of the Secret Intelligence Service. There are therefore no circumstances in which major decisions by the Secret Intelligence Service would not be submitted to me or one of my Cabinet colleagues for approval, or of which I, or they, are not otherwise informed.

Nepal

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if the Government will make immediate funding available for the human rights monitoring commission referred to in the Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of Nepal and the United Nations High Commission for Human Rights to start work. [833]

The UK attaches great importance to improving the human rights situation in Nepal. Our expenditure plan for the Financial Year 2005–06 includes an allocation of approximately £80,000 for the support of various human rights groups in Nepal and £75,000 on human rights training support. We were closely involved in efforts to secure Nepalese agreement to international human rights monitoring in Nepal under the Office for the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). We are keen in principle to offer financial support to the OHCHR office and are currently exploring suitable sources of funding.

Sudan

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make representations to the Government of Sudan on behalf of Dr. Mudawi Ibrahim Adam. [133]

Dr. Mudawi Ibrahim Adam, a prominent Sudanese human rights activist, was detained in Khartoum on 8 May along with two colleagues, Mr. Yasir Saleem and Mr. Abdallah Taha. Mr. Abdallah was released without charge on 11 May. Dr. Mudawi and Mr. Yasir were subsequently charged under articles 53 (Espionage against the Country) and 57 (Entering and Photographing Military Areas and Works). Mr. Yasir was released unharmed on 12 May. Dr. Mudawi was released unharmed on 17 May.

Our embassy in Khartoum raised this case with the acting Foreign Minister on 10 May and on 14 May. We also supported representations made by the local EU presidency on this matter.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will estimate how many deaths have occurred in Darfur in the last 18 months. [134]

Estimates of deaths in Darfur since the crisis began vary from 70,000 to 300,000 and above. Accurate figures are not available and better data are needed. The UK is funding the World Health Organisation to conduct a new mortality survey, and preliminary results are expected by mid-June. This will only give a snapshot of the situation; we have to accept that, given the complexities on the ground, we are unlikely ever to get a full picture of deaths from this conflict.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations he has made to the Government of Sudan about the aerial bombardment of parts of Darfur. [135]

We have made regular representations to the Government of Sudan regarding aerial bombardment in Darfur. In early February the Government of Sudan announced that they would remove their Antonov aircraft from Darfur and refrain from hostile use of aircraft there. Both my right hon. Friends the Foreign Secretary and the Secretary of State for International Development (Hilary Benn) pressed the Sudanese Minister for Foreign Affairs on this issue when they met on 10 February, and received the same assurances. The Antonovs appear to have been withdrawn. Although helicopter gunships remain in Darfur, the UN Secretary General has concluded in his monthly reports that there has been no further hostile use of aircraft since January.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what evidence he will make available to the International Criminal Court investigation into Darfur. [136]

At the request of the International Criminal Court (ICC), we currently share background material to help the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) become better attuned to the political situation in the region.

We are also negotiating with the OTP an agreement to allow the provision of any material that may be useful to investigative work.

The UK is fully committed to supporting the ICC and is engaged in dialogue with the Court at official level to consider ways of providing effective practical support.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps he has taken to encourage the Sudanese Liberation Army and the Justice and Equality Movement to attend peace talks about Darfur. [137]

We are in regular contact with both the Sudanese Liberation Movement (SLM—the political arm of the Sudanese Liberation Army) and the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) and have consistently encouraged them to return to peace talks about Darfur. The SLM and JEM have now announced that they will attend a new round of peace talks with the Government. A recent regional Heads of State meeting on Darfur, held in Libya on 16–17 May, announced that the talks would restart in Abuja by the end of May. A UK representative will attend the talks and offer support to the African Union mediators.

Western Sahara

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions he has had with the Secretary-General of the UN on the replacement of the current head of MINURSO in the Western Sahara. [141]

The appointment of a successor for Alvaro de Soto, the UN Secretary-General's Special Representative for Western Sahara, is a matter for the Secretary-General alone. He has our full support in the nomination process.

Yemen

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what plans he has to change travel advice relating to Yemen. [576]

We have no immediate plans to change the travel advice for Yemen. However, the advice, available on the Foreign and Commonwealth Office website: www.fco.gov.uk, is kept under constant review. It is checked routinely and following any significant incident and, at a minimum, is revised and re-issued at least once every three months.

Zimbabwe

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps the Government are taking to promote democracy in Zimbabwe. [310]

Our aim remains the early restoration of democratic governance, human rights and the rule of law to Zimbabwe.

We have worked with the international community to that end, isolating Mugabe and imposing sanctions, and will continue to support all those in Zimbabwe working for peaceful democratic change.

Home Department

Border Inspection Posts

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the deletion of South Shields from designated border inspection posts under Commission Decision 2005/102/EC of OJ L33 of 5 February. [500]

I have been asked to reply.

There was no border inspection post (BIP) at South Shields.

There was a BIP at North Shields (listed as Tyne-Northshields) which was removed from the list of approved BIPs by Commission Decision 2005/102/EC. Defra suspended the operation of the BIP at North Shields on 26 June 2003 as it did not comply with the requirements to operate under EU law. The operators elected not to invest further to bring it up to the required standard.

Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he will reply to the letters from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton, with regard to (a) Mr. Hassan Nadir Rashid, dated 4 April and (b) Mr. H. Riaz, dated 7 April. [187]

The information is as follows:

24 May 2005.(a) I wrote to my right hon. Friend on

24 May 2005.(b) I wrote to my right hon. Friend on

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when his Department will reply to the letters sent on 17 December 2004 and 20 January 2005 concerning Mr. Salamat Khan, Home Office reference S774861/4. [883]

Hashem Adbul-Aziz Barwari

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when Hashem Abdul-Aziz Barwari, reference B11 02376, will receive his clearance papers. [161]

Mr. Barwari's application for further leave to remain has not yet been dealt with. The Immigration and Nationality Directorate will write to his representatives in due course to ask if he wishes to attend an interview or whether he wishes his application considered on the information already available.

Marriage Applications

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department

(1) how many marriage applications there have been in the UK in each year since 1997; [299]

(2) how many marriage applications there were in each register office in the UK in each month since May 1997. [300]

I have been asked to reply.

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the Registrar General, who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Len Cook to Mr. David Davis, dated 24 May 2005

As Registrar General for England and Wales I have been asked to reply to your recent parliamentary Questions on marriage applications. (299 and 300)

I am placing in the House of Commons Library a table showing the available information. It gives the numbers of intended marriages taken in each local authority in England and Wales for 1998–1999 to 2003–2004. Comparable data for Scotland and Northern Ireland are not held centrally, and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.

From 1 January 2001, both the bride and groom had to give notice. Prior to then, couples who lived in the same registration district gave one notice. Figures exclude marriages in an Anglican Church where notice of marriage is given after banns.

Number of intended marriages taken in each local authority in England and Wales 1998–99 to 2003–04

Local authority

1998–99

1999–2000

2000–01

2001–02

2002–03

2003–04

Barking and Dagenham

720

737

872

1568

2,004

2,171

Barnet

1,578

1,560

1,820

3,580

3,809

4,055

Barnsley

858

852

1,097

1,678

1,721

1,752

Bath and North East Somerset

654

657

812

1,266

1,347

1,380

Bedfordshire

1,571

1,481

1,983

3,170

3,394

3,535

Bexley

920

933

1,156

1,814

1,938

2,007

Birmingham

3,721

3,615

4,291

7,201

8,098

7,861

Blackburn-with-Darwen

650

601

664

1,102

1,130

1,259

Blackpool

689

655

766

1,226

1,249

1,436

Blaenau

260

262

263

384

431

513

Bolton

1,094

1,109

1,266

2,108

2,287

2,390

Bournemouth

799

796

951

1,589

1,720

1,746

Bracknell Forest

505

431

597

911

1,024

1,078

Bradford

1,712

1,662

2,045

3,397

3,494

3,575

Brent

1,328

1,286

2,014

4,104

4,474

4,460

Bridgend

499

505

605

960

1,093

1,141

Brighton and Hove

1,134

1,054

1,630

2,687

2,611

2,865

Bristol

1,755

1,767

2,152

3,497

3,878

3,967

Bromley

1,255

1,320

1,422

2,383

2,621

2,607

Buckinghamshire

1,750

1,660

1,980

3,319

3,473

3,788

Bury

778

821

865

1,413

1,485

1,673

Caerphilly

675

702

803

1,281

1,391

1,451

Calderdale

765

758

858

1,399

1,497

1,605

Cambridgeshire

2,059

2,067

2,583

4,309

4,603

4,731

Camden

1,036

1,049

1,297

2,587

2,850

3,075

Cardiff

1,279

1,317

1,486

2,216

2,496

2,662

Carmarthenshire

607

616

630

1,064

1,190

1,138

Ceredigion

218

177

220

361

444

446

Cheshire

2,773

2,725

3,071

5,205

5,406

5,466

City of Westminster

883

975

1450

3,111

3,047

3,259

Conwy

416

388

470

777

755

822

Cornwall

1,837

1,907

2,376

3,802

4,071

4,307

Coventry

1,211

1,264

1,629

2,524

2,386

2,647

Croydon

1,469

1,408

1,766

3,194

3,328

3,522

Cumbria

1,602

1,626

1,966

3,245

3,341

3,570

Darlington

451

441

510

796

812

868

Denbighshire

287

307

332

560

605

626

Derby

1,097

1,063

1,203

2,008

1,896

2,037

Derbyshire

2,735

2,848

3,262

5,296

5,697

5,986

Devon

2,558

2,551

3,087

4,971

5,437

5,818

Doncaster

1,183

1,225

1,487

2,236

2,263

2,644

Dorset

1,345

1,360

1,631

2,625

2,749

3,101

Dudley

1,142

1,167

1,323

2,028

2,327

2,225

Durham

1,901

1,893

2,090

3,576

3,576

3,931

Ealing

1,601

1,540

2,098

3,878

3,923

4,155

East Riding of Yorkshire

1,007

1,012

1,290

2,030

2,160

2,422

East Sussex

1,925

1,987

2,411

4,061

4,324

4,257

Enfield

254

1,322

1,565

3,033

3,116

3,333

Essex

4,844

4,919

5,938

10,044

10,888

11,218

Flintshire

624

517

732

1,161

1,193

1,241

Gateshead

797

834

943

1,476

1,473

1,578

Gloucestershire

2,072

2,132

2,524

4,204

4,433

4,686

Greenwich

1,074

987

1,215

2,218

2,419

2,855

Gwynedd

388

360

427

673

716

748

Hackney

1,188

1,119

1,442

2,923

3,479

3,437

Halton

561

492

579

979

928

1,011

Hammersmith and Fulham

881

851

1,147

2,207

2,417

2,472

Hampshire

4,937

4,937

5,923

10,094

10,433

10,560

Haringey

1,422

1,408

2001

3,857

4,544

4,932

Harrow

871

907

1,040

1,873

2,072

2,005

Hartlepool

381

354

416

688

696

675

Havering

858

844

936

1,578

1,666

1,792

Herefordshire

600

552

678

1,084

1,130

1,221

Hertfordshire

4406

4,386

5,169

8,717

9,241

9,577

Hillingdon

1,043

1,075

1,272

2,190

2,079

2,233

Hounslow

1,062

1,102

1,528

2,550

2,803

2,878

Isle of Anglesey

200

226

254

367

461

385

Isle of Wight

501

498

591

924

1,086

1,051

Isles of Scilly

6

7

6

18

20

13

Islington

916

947

1,217

2,308

2,559

2,541

Kensington and Chelsea

731

674

970

1,887

1,931

1,933

Kent

4,934

4,874

6,017

9,498

10,516

11,206

Kingston Upon Hull

1,109

1,106

1,231

2,105

2,281

2,377

Kingston Upon Thames

710

680

859

1,327

1,380

1,546

Kirklees

1,556

1,576

1,937

3,097

3,195

3,343

Knowsley

531

546

605

881

886

1,009

Lambeth

1,611

1,606

2,232

4,299

4,883

1,836

Lancashire

4,404

4,583

5,185

8,329

8,922

9,527

Leeds

2,781

2,802

3,361

5,436

5,741

6,191

Leicester

1,245

1,169

1,604

2,791

2,808

2,864

Leicestershire

2,194

2,171

2,543

4,150

4,596

4,591

Lewisham

1,232

1,258

1,623

3,465

3,523

3,957

Lincolnshire

2,074

2,124

2,633

4,301

5,017

5,116

Liverpool

1,517

1,472

1,651

2,651

2,889

2,899

London Corporation

45

35

33

64

71

70

Luton

732

726

874

1,650

1,664

1,983

Manchester

1,679

1,608

2,015

3,273

3,616

4,001

Medway

1,197

1,108

1,512

2,032

2,508

2,508

Merthyr Tydfil

210

198

275

464

442

387

Merton

918

881

1,209

1,991

2,059

2,387

Middlesbrough

571

544

622

1,014

966

1,037

Milton Keynes

981

1,008

1,179

2,194

2,275

2,509

Monmouthshire

289

271

302

560

581

646

Neath Port Talbot

487

473

530

816

1,079

1,072

Newcastle Upon Tyne

1,056

1,011

1,207

1,852

1,970

2,025

Newham

1,297

1,262

1,569

3,139

3,498

3,401

Newport

530

529

576

945

1,124

1,129

Norfolk

2,988

3,058

3,637

6,284

6,476

6,750

North East Lincolnshire

637

614

707

1,148

1,281

1,296

North Lincolnshire

506

606

628

1,027

1,061

1,251

North Somerset

688

676

775

1,332

1,567

1,533

North Tyneside

843

852

1,084

1,445

1,704

1,837

North Yorkshire

2,033

2,179

2,443

4,047

4,429

4,329

Northamptonshire

2,738

2,184

3,318

5,340

5,941

6,273

Northumberland

1,177

1,152

1,347

1,997

2,170

2,368

Nottingham

1,117

1,146

1,355

2,255

2,447

2,593

Nottinghamshire

2,637

2,660

3,274

5,123

5,680

5,846

Oldham

822

790

965

1,479

1,641

1,618

Oxfordshire

2,403

2,259

3,094

5,114

5,407

5,733

Pembrokeshire

366

328

398

693

738

756

Peterborough

689

792

960

1,571

1,706

1,730

Plymouth

1,106

1,148

1,366

2,312

2,495

2,399

Poole

669

598

785

1,239

1,277

1,355

Portsmouth

960

984

1,142

1,974

2,153

2,201

Powys

363

345

377

634

710

794

Reading

739

756

936

1,607

1,769

1,819

Redbridge

1,148

1,132

1,294

2,417

2,327

2,497

Redcar and Cleveland

526

531

628

974

880

1,029

Rhonddacynontaf

837

791

940

1,539

1,562

1,751

Richmond upon Thames

806

822

1,028

1,783

1,881

1,894

Rochdale

864

845

933

1,488

1,570

1,763

Rotherham

892

857

1,033

1,589

1,781

1,947

Rutland

133

102

128

226

264

260

Salford

992

898

1,138

1,747

1,693

1,901

Sandwell

1,216

1,234

1,330

2,284

2,565

2,493

Sefton

1,071

987

1,133

1,725

1,837

1,952

Sheffield

1,753

1,833

2,247

3,566

3,718

3,778

Shropshire

917

908

1,069

1,712

2,082

2,018

Slough

609

575

778

103

1,443

1,526

Solihull

679

700

728

1,100

1,182

1,344

Somerset

1,780

1,784

2,219

3,494

3,815

3,784

South Gloucestershire

1,032

974

1,223

1,957

2,020

2,239

South Tyneside

560

568

668

954

1,133

1,109

Southampton

997

983

1,312

2,023

2,213

2,190

Southend-on-Sea

801

792

864

1,537

1,621

1,702

Southwark

1,440

1,368

1,825

3,098

4,170

4,283

St. Helens

682

668

798

1,184

1,148

1,462

Staffordshire

2,910

2,943

3,451

5,577

6,063

6,419

Stockport

1,179

1,135

1,388

2037

2249

2337

Stockton-on-Tees

770

743

862

1,331

1,385

1,523

Stoke on Trent

1,091

1,021

1,154

1,820

2,097

2,155

Suffolk

2,748

2,587

3,035

5,060

5,365

5,851

Sunderland

995

1,101

1,248

1,880

2,054

2,199

Surrey

4,282

4,245

5,201

8,395

8,677

8,894

Sutton

883

876

1,098

1,599

1,707

1,715

Swansea

792

740

887

1,521

1,569

1,627

Swindon

869

890

1,146

1,670

1,839

1,988

Tameside

1,002

896

1,051

1,595

1,754

1,746

Telford and Wrekin

670

637

814

1,252

1,383

1,667

The Vale of Glamorgan

501

480

559

860

926

973

Thurrock

648

609

765

1,238

1,313

1,435

Torbay

536

591

768

1,058

1,221

1,271

Torfaen

371

341

390

726

648

658

Tower Hamlets

759

744

1,121

2,348

2,652

2,848

Trafford

951

904

1,070

1,729

1,760

1,897

Wakefield

1,260

1,285

1,625

2,444

2,721

2,904

Walsall

984

999

1,046

1,763

1,678

1,836

Waltham Forest

999

1,046

1,429

2,807

3,081

3,122

Wandsworth

1,502

1,513

2,151

3,813

4,145

4,553

Warrington

788

764

897

1,433

1,565

1,593

Warwickshire

1,944

2,007

2341

3807

3898

4148

West Berkshire

572

561

683

1,122

1,303

1,296

West Sussex

3,044

3,134

3,703

6,116

6,328

6,593

Wigan

1,245

1,297

1,437

2,314

2,365

2,637

Wiltshire

1,679

1,394

2026

3,361

3,593

3,597

Windsor and Maidenhead

565

543

713

1,131

1,174

1,196

Wirral

1,221

1,205

1,480

2,361

2,383

2,538

Wokingham

579

574

701

1,204

1,138

1,237

Wolverhampton

937

1,066

1,118

1,771

1,994

2,045

Worcestershire

2,049

2,011

1,987

3,701

4,277

4,193

Wrexham

437

468

505

896

805

908

York

856

766

956

1,590

1,649

1,697

Total

210,633

209,803

255,190

424,325

456,444

474,721

Visa Applications

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what stage the visa applications for (a) Bukola Fakeye, reference F1054346 and (b) Lucky Osadolor, reference B1127338 have reached; and if he will make a statement. [103]

holding answer 23 May 2005

The Home Office wrote to Miss Bukola Fakeye's legal representatives, Duncan Lewis and Co Solicitors, on the 19 May 2005 asking for additional evidence in order to assist them in reaching a final decision on Miss Fayeke's applications for indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom. The Home Office have asked that the evidence be submitted by 6 June 2005. It is therefore anticipated that the Home Office will be in a position to reach a final decision in this case by the end of June 2005.

Inquiries into Mr. Osadolor's case have been concluded and we will shortly be writing to his representatives to let him know the outcome.

Health

Breast Cancer

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment her Department has made of the results of trials published in The Lancet on detection rates for breast cancer by MRI scan and mammogram; and if her Department will take steps to ensure that all at-risk women under 50 are offered MRI scans. [882]

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on familial breast cancer was published in May 2004. NICE has committed to reviewing this guidance when the results of the magnetic resonance imaging for breast screening (MARIBS) and other magnetic resonance imaging studies become available.

NICE's clinical guidelines bring clarity to complex areas of diagnosis and care by providing recommendations for good practice that are based on the best available evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness. Clinicians are expected to take full account of these guidelines.

Dental Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps her Department has taken to (a) retain and (b) recruit dental practitioners who register new NHS patients in the constituency of Leeds, north-west; and if she will make a statement. [378]

Leeds north-west primary care trust (PCT) has received £96,000 capital funding, which is being utilised through the PCTs dental incentive scheme, to ensure that the current level of commitment of local dentists to the national health service is maintained. This funding supports general dental practitioners in ensuring patient safety and improving practice premises, in particular replacing dental chairs with modern equipment.

A further £42,000 revenue funding has been received by the PCT, which will be partly utilised to provide three extra NHS dental sessions a week, enabling an additional 12 patients a week to receive treatment. This locality-based access scheme will provide urgent and routine treatment sessions for non-registered NHS patients in the area.

In April 2005, the PCT had six general dental practices working under personal dental services (PDS) arrangements. These practices have successfully secured an additional £221,000 to increase the workforce, benefiting an additional 1,355 new patients and enabling the re-registration of approximately 2,500 NHS patients.

The PCT took part in the recent West Yorkshire international dental recruitment campaign and successfully supported a local practice to recruit a Polish dentist commencing in August 2005. The PCT is also working with local general dental practitioners to explore other avenues of recruitment to existing vacancies.

Drug Addicts

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many drug addicts were being treated by GPs in (a) Bassetlaw and (b) England on the latest date for which figures are available. [6]

holding answer 23 May 2005

Information on the number being treated in Bassetlaw is not available centrally.

The numbers in drug treatment in England in 2003–04, the latest year for which published figures are available, was 154,000.

Food Poisoning

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people were recorded as suffering from food poisoning in each of the last five years; what the main causes were; and if she will make a statement. [691]

The number of notified cases of food poisoning in England and Wales reported to the Health Protection Agency (HPA) each year since 2000 is shown in table one. Total notifications have shown a decrease since 2000.

Table 1: Annual corrected food poisoning notifications, England and Wales 2000–04(2)

Formally notified

Otherwise ascertained(3)

Total

2000

46,481

40,047

86,528

2001

46,768

38,700

85,468

2002

38,541

34,108

72,649

2003

35,211

35,821

71,032

2004(2)

34,070

36,379

70,449

Total

201,071

185,055

386,126

(2) Provisional data

(3) Includes port health authorities

Source:

Health Protection Agency.

The main causes of food poisoning are often unknown, as food poisoning is a diagnosis based on clinical suspicion rather than laboratory confirmation. Notified cases of food poisoning are not considered to be a reliable indicator of food-borne disease due to considerable under-reporting. Very few notified cases will be based on evidence supporting a suspected association with food.

The HPA has estimated that, in 2000, there may have been as many as 1.3 million cases of food-borne disease acquired in England and Wales, of which around 370,000 consulted a doctor. In that year, only 86,528 cases of food poisoning were notified.

Recent research undertaken by the HPA suggests thatCampylobacter and Salmonella are the major causes of food-borne disease in England and Wales 1 . The annual totals for UK-acquired laboratory-confirmed cases of these pathogens in England and Wales are shown in table two.

1 GK Adak, SM Long, SJ O'Brien—Trends in indigenous food-borne disease and deaths in England and Wales1992–2000. Gut 2002, 51: 832–841.

Table 2: Number of laboratory-confirmed cases of UK-acquired Campylobacter and Salmonella infection; England and Wales 2000–04(4)

Campylobacter(5)

Salmonella(5)

2000

43,815

11,500

2001

44,368

12,951

2002

37,316

11,691

2003

36,204

12,245

2004(4)

33,384

10,551

Total

195,087

58,938

(4) Provisional data.

(5) Faecal and lower gastrointestinal tract isolates.

Source:

Health Protection Agency.

Final figures for 2003 show a 17 per cent. decrease in the number of laboratory-confirmed cases ofCampylobacter infection compared with figures for 2000. Data for 2004 suggest a further decrease but these figures are provisional and may be subject to change during the course of 2005. The number of laboratory-confirmed cases of Salmonella infection in 2003 remain virtually unchanged compared with the figure for 2000. Provisional data for 2004 suggest a decrease in laboratory-confirmed cases of Salmonella in England and Wales. These declines in laboratory-confirmed cases of Campylobacter and Salmonella are also reflected in food poisoning notifications, which show a 19 per cent. decrease over the same time-period (2000–04).

Food Supplements Directive

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will make a statement on the recent reasoned opinion of Advocate General Geelhoed that the Food Supplements Directive is invalid under EU law. [319]

The Advocate General's opinion concluded that the Food Supplements Directive 2002/46/EC is invalid on the grounds that it infringes the principle of proportionality because basic principles of Community law, such as the requirements of legal protection, of legal certainty and of sound administration have not been properly taken into account. This opinion is not binding in the European Union. The European Court of Justice will make the final decision regarding the invalidity of the Directive.

Fuel Emissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will estimate the cost to the national health service of providing treatment to patients suffering illnesses provoked partly or wholly by emissions from fuel products in the last financial year for which figures are available. [91]

This information is not collected directly as it is not possible to identify individual patients affected by air pollution. The link between air pollution and hospital admissions is derived from statistical correlations between daily air pollution levels and routine daily statistics on total respiratory hospital admissions. The national health service costs given as follows should be regarded only as rough estimates based on average figures.

The Department's committee on the medical effects of air pollutants (COMEAP) estimated in 19981 that there were 10,500 respiratory hospital admissions (additional or brought forward) per year due to PM 1 0 (PM 1 0 refers to the mass of particles less than 10 mm in diameter per cubic metre of air) in urban areas of Great Britain. The equivalent estimate for sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) was 3,500 respiratory hospital admissions.

Assuming that two thirds of the PM102 and the vast majority of SO 2 in urban areas is due directly or indirectly to fuel emissions from transport or from industry, as a rough estimate it can be assumed that up to around 10,500 respiratory hospital admissions in urban areas of Great Britain may be related to emissions from fuel products.

The Department's ad-hoc group on the economic appraisal of the health effects of air pollution estimated in 1999 that the average cost of an emergency respiratory hospital admission was around £1,400. This gives a rough estimate of NHS costs due to emissions from fuel products of up to £14.7 million (£17.3 million in 2004 prices). This is an upper bound assuming that all respiratory hospital admissions are additional rather than simply brought forward as a result of higher air pollution days. The estimate does not include respiratory hospital admissions due to ozone3 as an estimate of the proportion of ozone formed from fuel product precursors was not easily available. The estimate also does not include NHS costs of cardiovascular hospital admissions due to PM 1 0 or NHS costs of exacerbations of respiratory symptoms due to SO 2 or PM 1 0 .

Further work on this issue may be considered as part of the work of the new COMEAP sub-group on quantification.

1 Based on pollution levels in 1995–96. Pollution levels have reduced substantially since then.

2 This includes PM 1 0 derived from transport, from industry and from Europe (itself mainly derived from transport and industry). It excludes the coarse fraction of PM 1 0 (mainly coarse dust and sea salt).

3 The estimate also excludes hospital admissions due to nitrogen dioxide to avoid double counting with PM 1 0 .

Heatwave Plan

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) whether additional resources will be provided to (a) primary care trusts and (b) other NHS organisations when levels (i) 1, (ii) 2, (iii) 3 and (iv) 4 of the Heatwave Plan for England are reached; [251]

(2) To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the resource requirements necessary to implement the Heatwave Plan for England. [256]

The assessment has included an assessment of the adequacy of existing resources to do all that is necessary to implement levels 1 and 2 without diverting them from existing commitments. The resources required to implement levels 3 and 4 are a function of the length, severity and geographical spread of a heat wave.

There will be no additional resources made available from central departmental budgets for implementation of any level of the Heatwave Plan for England, apart from those already identified to print and distribute copies of the advice leaflets and secure proper surveillance from the Meteorological Office, NHS Direct and the Health Protection Agency. Many of the actions required at level 1 and 2 are being taken anyway as part of normal care, and all of them can reasonably be thought of as essential contributions to emergency planning required by 'duty of care'.

National health service organisations and local authorities are expected to include in their financial planning the need to fund contingencies, of which costs associated with levels 3 and 4 of the Heatwave Plan are an example, along with those arising from, for example, widespread flooding.

Mobile Roadside Cafes

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will make a statement on the application to mobile roadside cafés of (a) smoking and (b) health and safety regulations relating to food preparation. [468]

holding answer 23 May 2005

All mobile roadside cafés in which food is prepared must meet the requirements of the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995. Local authority environmental health officers will inspect these vehicles to ensure that they meet the requirements of the Regulations. Guidance on compliance with these requirements indicates that smoking in food handling areas is strictly prohibited.

Overseas Nurses

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many foreign nurses were employed in the NHS in Lancashire (a) in 1997, (b) in 2001 and (c) on the latest date for which figures are available; and what percentage of the total those numbers represents in each case. [652]

The Department does not collect information on the country of origin of nurses recruited to the national health service.

Treasury

Bank Charges

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will commission research into the (a) reasons for and (b) level of unavoidable miscellaneous charges made by banks, with particular reference to (i) survey fees, (ii) booking fees, (iii) arrangement fees, (iv) higher lending charge fees and (v) sealing of deeds fees; and if he will make a statement. [298]

As my hon. Friend, the former Financial Secretary (Stephen Timms), said in his answer on 18 March 2005, Official Report, column 479W, the Government have no plans to commission research into miscellaneous charges made by banks. However, following the Cruickshank Report, in pre-Budget report 2003 the Government asked the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) to take on an enhanced role in relation to payment systems for a period of four years. The OFT have established the Payment Systems Task Force, which is working to resolve competition, efficiency and incentive issues relating to payment systems. The Taskforce has recently agreed that a faster payments service be introduced for telephone banking, internet banking and standing order payments, and plans to examine a number of other topics including cheques, price efficiency and access and governance of the UK's major payment schemes.

Correspondence

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he will reply to the letters from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to (a) Mr. and Mrs. Tiplady dated 4 April and (b) Mr. J. H. Edwards dated 1 March. [71]

I replied to the right hon. Gentleman's letter concerning Mr. Edwards on 5 April and my right hon. Friend the Paymaster General will be writing to him shortly about the case of Mr. and Mrs. Tiplady.

Death Certification

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer in what circumstances deaths may be certified by persons who are not medically qualified; and what arrangements are made for the clinical audit of such certification, including stated cause of death. [66]

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the Registrar General, who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Len Cook to Mr. Tim Boswell, dated 24 May 2005

As National Statistician and Registrar General for England and Wales, I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking in what circumstances deaths may be certified by persons who are not medically qualified; and what arrangements are made for the clinical audit of such certification, including stated cause of death. (66)

Before a death can be registered in England and Wales, the cause must be certified by a doctor who attended the deceased during his or her last illness, or by a coroner. Coroners need not be medically qualified. They are required to be qualified either as doctors or as lawyers: most hold legal qualifications and some have both.

Deaths must be referred to the coroner if:

The cause of death is unknown

The death was violent, or unnatural or there are suspicious circumstances

The death 'may' be due to:

accident

suicide

self-neglect

neglect by others

industrial disease, or the deceased's employment

The death occurred during

an operation, or before full recovery from an anaesthetic

detention in police or prison custody, or shortly after release

There is no doctor who attended the deceased available to complete the MCCD

The deceased was not seen by the certifying doctor either after death or within 14 days before death

Once a death has been referred, it is the responsibility of the coroner to decide what investigation is required. Coroners can only certify the cause of death for the purposes of registration if they have had a post mortem performed by a pathologist, or held an inquest, or both.

There are no routine arrangements for clinical audit of the work of coroners.

Euro

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he will next publish his assessment of the five economic tests for the UK to join the euro. [326]

Government policy on membership of the single currency is unchanged. It remains as set out by the Chancellor in his statement to the House of Commons in October 1997, and again in the Chancellor's statement of the Five Tests assessment in June 2003.

Budget 2005 noted that the Government did not propose a euro assessment be initiated at the time of the Budget and that the Treasury will again review the situation at Budget time next year, as required by the Chancellor's June 2003 statement.

MRSA

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many people in the UK have died of MRSA in NHS hospitals since 2001. [312]

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Len Cook to Andrew Rosindell, dated 24 May 2005

As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking how many people in the UK have died from MRSA in NHS hospitals since 2001. (312)

Special analysis of MRSA deaths are undertaken by the Office for National Statistics and are published annually in Health Statistics Quarterly. These are for England and Wales only. The latest year for which figures are available is 2003. Numbers of deaths where MRSA was a contributory factor in NHS general hospitals within England and Wales are given in the table below.

Number of deaths in NHS general hospitals where MRSA was a contributory factor, England and Wales, 2001–03(6)(7)

Number of deaths

2001

649

2002

720

2003

855

(6) Identified using the methodology described in Griffiths C, Lamagni TL, Crowcroft NS, Duckworth G and Rooney C (2004) Trends in MRSA in England and Wales: analysis of morbidity and mortality data for 1993–2002. Health Statistics Quarterly 21, 15–22.

(7) Figures are for deaths occurring in the years 2001 to 2003.

Source:

Office for National Statistics

Tax Credit Overpayments

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many cases of overpayment of tax credits involving Bassetlaw constituents are unresolved. [49]

This information is not available, but statistics on overpayments will be published on 1 June 2005 under National Statistics.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many recipients in Stroud constituency have been identified as having received over-payments of tax credits; and how many of these over-payments are due to computer software problems. [73]

Statistics on overpayments will be published on 1 June 2005 under National Statistics. A breakdown of the causes of those over-payments is not available.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the highest level of over-payment of tax credit is; and what arrangements have been put in place to recoup such over-payments without breaching Government guidelines of not putting families into hardship. [74]

Information requested is not available.

The Inland Revenue's approach to handling over-payments is set out in their Code of Practice 26 "What happens if we have paid you too much tax credit?"

VAT

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will reduce the rate of VAT charged on audio books. [84]

Under agreements with our European partners that govern the VAT system, we can apply a reduced VAT rate of no lower than 5 per cent. on goods and services from within a prescribed list in the Sixth VAT Directive (Annex H). There is no provision in this list for a reduced rate of VAT on audio books.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what discussions the Government (a) has had, (b) is having and (c) is scheduled to have with (i) the European Commission and (ii) members and representatives of EU member state Governments on adjusting VAT ratings on particular goods and services; if he will list the (A) goods and (B) services under discussion; who initiated each discussion; and if he will make a statement. [322]

The Government holds discussions with the European Commission and other EU member states on many issues, including reduced rates of VAT.

The Commission's review of reduced rates was adopted on 23 July 2003. Since then, a range of goods and services has been discussed, such as restaurant services, compact discs, repairs to listed places of worship, energy-saving materials for do-it-yourself installation, energy-saving products, memorials, and the labour-intensive services listed in Annex K of the Sixth VAT Directive (small repairs, house repairs, window cleaning, cleaning in private households, domestic care services, and hairdressing).

Constitutional Affairs

Electoral Registration

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs whether the Government plans to require some form of identification to be shown in order to vote at a polling station. [28]

The Government currently have no plans to require a form of identification to be shown in order to vote at a polling station, but we will consider the issue along with discussion of improvements to postal voting security.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will seek to amend the law relating to electoral registration to require individual registration. [82]

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what the Government's policy is on extending the use of individual electoral registration from Northern Ireland to other parts of the United Kingdom. [27]

The Government's view on voter registration, expressed in our response to the Electoral Commission's Voting for Change report, is that while we are sympathetic to the principles of individual registration and recognise its potential benefits, we are concerned to maintain a straightforward system and comprehensive electoral registers.

Our preferred solution is to collect the additional individual identifiers recommended by the Electoral Commission (signature and date of birth), but to do so through an adapted household form. We believe that this system will improve security in the same way as individual registration, but will reduce the risk of falling levels of registration.

We are currently discussing this proposal with electoral administrators, the political parties and other stakeholders. If a decision is made to take this policy forward, we intend to do so through an Electoral Administration Bill, when parliamentary time allows.

Freedom of Information

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs how many and what proportions of (a) requests under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 from (i) journalists, (ii) Members of Parliament and (iii) others and (b) written parliamentary questions tabled since 1 January 2005 have been referred to the Central Clearing House. [123]

Since the Freedom of Information Act is requestor blind, there is no way to provide exact figures relating to the number of requests that have been referred to the Clearing House from either journalists or Members of Parliament. However, we estimate that, through self-identification of media requestors, that of the nearly 2000 cases referred to date, approximately 830 (42 per cent.) of requests have come from journalists and 130 (7 per cent.) have been from Members of Parliament.

As written parliamentary questions are not counted as requests for information within the terms of the Freedom of Information Act, these are not referred to the Clearing House for advice. Departments are instead expected to seek guidance from their parliamentary branches as normal.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what the budget of the Central Clearing House is; how many officials work there; on what date it was established; by whom; and to whom it is responsible. [124]

The Clearing House was established in September of 2004. It is part of the Information Rights Division in the Constitution Directorate of Department of Constitutional Affairs and is ultimately responsible to the Permanent Secretary, Alex Allan. There are currently 12 posts within the Clearing House, two of which are directly funded by Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) to provide expertise on the environmental information regulations.

The implementation costs of the Clearing House totalled approximately £196,000, while its current operational cost and budget which includes IT, staffing costs including those posts funded by DEFRA and maintenance of the central monitoring system, currently stands at £511,404 per annum.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will place in the Library a copy of the (a) terms of reference and (b) mission statement for the Central Clearing House. [125]

The Clearing House does not have an individual mission statement, however it sits within the Information Rights Division, part of the Constitution Directorate in Department for Constitutional Affairs. Its role is to offer advice and assistance to Whitehall Departments in dealing with information requests made under the Data Protection Act, the Freedom of Information Act, and the Environmental Information Regulations. It has responsibility for those requests which are particularly complex or have cross Government implications and to ensure a consistent and appropriate approach is taken in the application of the legislation.

Its terms of reference are further defined in the Clearing House toolkit, a document produced for departmental FOI practitioners. This document is currently being revised to reflect experience over the period since the FOIA came into force. However, once this revision is complete, we will be placing copies on the DCA website, which is expected by the early summer.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs how many inquiries have been made to Government Departments under the Freedom of Information Act 2000; and what estimate has been made of the number which have been refused. [442]

We are committed to publishing a quarterly bulletin on the performance of Central Government under Freedom of Information and this will include details on the numbers of requests and rates of refusal. The information for the first bulletin is currently being validated for publication next month.

However, in a recent trial of this monitoring system with 27 Central Government Departments and Agencies, including all Departments of State, we collected information on those requests received in the month of January. This indicated that, in the first month of implementation, 4,462 requests were received by those monitored of which only 484, or 14 per cent., of those processed were refused in full.

Judicial Appointments

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs how many judicial appointments the Lord Chancellor has made since 1 March; and whom he has appointed. [389]

The Lord Chancellor has made 449 judicial appointments since 1 March 2005. A table detailing the names of those appointed, and the posts to which they were appointed to, has been placed in the Library of both Houses.

Lay Magistrates

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs how many people applied to become lay magistrates between 1997 and 2001; and how many were accepted. [293]

The information can be found in the following table.

Number of applicants

Number

appointed

Calendar year

1997

1,573

1998

1,609

1999

1,743

Financial year

2001

5,320

1,618

Records of the number of people who applied to become a magistrate were not collected centrally prior to 2001.

Figures for the number of people who were appointed in 2000 are not available. Collection of figures in 2000 changed from the calendar year to the financial year, no figures were published because of the three month gap January to March 2000.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what the budgeted departmental expenditure is for legal aid in asylum and immigration cases for 2005–06. [305]

Lord Chief Justice

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs when she will announce the name of the next Lord Chief Justice. [390]

There is currently no vacancy in the Office of Lord Chief Justice. If in the future a vacancy does occur, the procedure will be that my noble and learned Friend the Lord Chancellor will advise the Prime Minister, who will make a recommendation to Her Majesty. Once the Queen has approved the appointment, it will be announced by the Prime Minister's Office.

Postal Votes

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs whether the Government plans to hold an inquiry into the use of postal votes during the 2005 general election. [340]

The Electoral Commission, under Section 5 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000, has a statutory duty to report on the administration of all parliamentary general elections. We would expect their report on the 2005 general election to include analysis of the administration of postal voting, as was the case with their report on the 2001 general election.

Additionally, information about postal votes at the 2005 general election will be included in The Electoral Commission's report on participation and turnout, to be released later in the summer.

The Government currently have no plans for a separate inquiry into postal voting, but they will be discussing proposals for improvements to security with stakeholders.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what discussions her Department has had with electoral returning officers on (a) electoral fraud and (b) administrative errors involving postal votes. [343]

Throughout the general election period, we held daily discussions with representatives of electoral returning officers about the progress of the elections. An advisory board for the general election was set up in October 2004 to discuss the running of the general election.

Members of the group included electoral administrators and we will be holding an evaluation meeting to discuss the recent election, including the experience of postal voting. We have also arranged a number of meetings with electoral administrators to discuss the postal voting security measures announced after the general election.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will list the petitions made to Election Commissioners concerning allegations of electoral fraud involving postal votes since 1997; and what the findings of the Election Commissioners were in each case. [412]

A list of all petitions issued since 1997 in parliamentary, European and municipal elections is as follows. Those petitions that are recorded as "lapsed" are due to non payment of security for costs and as a result are not commonly in the public domain.

There have been a total of 37 election petitions issued since 1997:

Four parliamentary,

One European and

32 municipal.

High Court judges, will hear trials involving a parliamentary or European petition.

They may assign a municipal petition to be heard by a Commissioner.

As the table of petitions indicates, there have been only two trials before a Commissioner (in the Aston and Bordesley Green Wards, Birmingham city council).

Details of petitions are entered into two separate registers. These registers do not contain sufficient information to state which petitions specifically related to allegations of electoral fraud involving postal votes in every case.

The brief grounds and results of petitions have been indicated in the following table.

Date

Location

Petitioner/s

Respondent/s

Grounds

Result

Parliamentary

14 May1997

Dagenham

Richard Henry Dawson

Jack Thomas

R/O negligent in that he accepted nominations from non-electors etc.

Lapsed

15 May 1997

Winchester

Gerald Malone

Mark Oaten, Lindsey Garrett Fox

Quality of ballot papers rejected for want of official mark and rejected ballot papers disputed

Special case 6 October 1997. Petition allowed

22 May1997

North East Bedfordshire

Ashley Leggett

Sir Nicholas Walter Lyell QC, George Coates

Sir Nicholas Walter Lyell formerly Peter Rubery Hayward prevented from standing as a candidate by interim injunction obtained by Sir Nicholas Walter Lyell QC

Lapsed

10 August 2001

Romford

Peter Brian Thorogood

Andrew Rosindell

Offences contrary to s 113 (i) and (2)(b)of RPA1983 (no details given)

Lapsed

European

14 June 2004

Eastern England

John James Naisbitt

David Monks

Various

Struck out 30 July 2004

Local government

15 September 1997

Pakenham Ward of St. Edmundsbury

Lisa Francis Couper

Lynn Aisbett, Valerie Ann White

Votes cast for petition wrongly recorded by

R/O

Special case 17 October 1997. Petition allowed. Second respondent not duly elected. Petitioner should have been declared duly elected.

6 May 1999

Daneside Ward of Seaham town council

Steven Paul Colbon

Geraldine Bleasdale, John Henry Bleasdale, James Dickinson Edwards, Toni Robson, Marion Florence Wood, James Sheenin

Nomination rejected as invalid

Special case 30 July 1999 Petition dismissed. Issued out of time

26 May 1999

Selby central ward, Selby district council

Wendy Ruth Nicholls

Melanie Ann Davis, Richard Kenneth Fogden, Martin Connor

Votes incorrectly counted

Special case 30 July 1999. Petition allowed. Election valid. Second respondent not elected. Petitioner elected

26 May 1999

Creneswater ward of Southsea parish council

Simon James Cattermole

Nicola Vanessa Bentley, Rubayat Rahman Choud, David Heaven, Roger James, Nick Gurney

Votes incorrectly counted

Special case 30 July 1999 Petition allowed. Election valid. Fourth respondent not elected. Petitioner elected.

27 May 1999

Longfield ward of Dartford borough council

Alistair Samuel Jordan

Robert John Dunn, Albert Raymond Bassum, Jeremy Alan Kite, Christopher Shepherd

Candidate disqualified for standing(did not occupy property within area for whole of previous 12 months

Lapsed

27 May 1999

Aston ward, Birmingham district council

Gabra Miah

Ahmed Iftikhar

1. Illegal practice, respondent published false statements about petition.

2. Corrupt practice, third party included unauthorised election expenses.

3. Invalid nomination of fellow candidate

11 November 1999 Commissioner application to dismiss by respondent. Allowed. Petition dismissed. Trial date vacated.

27 May 1999

Parish of Baileston

Ruth Marjorie Dickson

Robert Charles Bailey and ors

Votes incorrectly counted

Special case 15 December 1999. Petition allowed. Election valid. Fifteenth respondent not elected. Tenth respondent elected.

27 May 1999

Rossington West ward of Rossington parish council

Barry Johnson

Nicholas Dobson, Doreen Appleby and ors

Votes incorrectly counted

Special case 30 July 1999. Petition allowed. Election valid. Second respondent not elected. Petitioner elected.

25 May 1999

Haughton East

Leslie Upton

David Lynotte and 8 ors

Undue influence impeding free exercise of franchise by use of Cabinet Minister and ors officials to influence voters

Lapsed

20 April 2000

South East ward of Knighton town council in Powys

Janice Geraldine Harris

Angus John Gilmore, Jackie Tonge

Votes incorrectly counted (some not counted)

Special case 11 December 2000. Petition allowed. Election valid. First respondent not elected. Petitioner elected.

20 May 2000

Parish of Bracknell ward of Bracknell town council

Walter Alfred Thompson

Susan Margaret Thompson, Gordon Mitchell

Votes incorrectly counted

Special case 25 July 2000. Petition allowed. Election valid. First respondent not elected. Petitioner elected.

25 May 2000

Sparkhill ward of Birmingham city council

Emily Cox, Amen Ellachi, Akhlag Ahmed, Tony King,

Jagdip Rai and chief executive of Birmingham city council

Personation, error, treating, bribery, undue influence overspending election expenses

25 July 2000 Application to strike out on grounds of late service of petition. Dismissed

25 May 2000

Nicholls ward, Birmingham city council

Abdul Malik

Mohammed Mansoor and Returning Officer

Voters abroad shown as having voted

Lapsed

27 June 2001

South Ribble North-West electoral division of Lancashire county council

Peter Terence Wakeling

Anthony Edward Pimblett, Max Winterbottom

Ballot papers for another electoral division handed out to some voters in error.

Special case 5 October 2001. Petition allowed. Election void. First respondent not duly elected.

27 June 2001

Ellogen North electoral division, Redruth, Cornwall

Terence Alan Rowe

Paul Thomas Holmes, Geoffrey Gordon Cox, Adam John Beer, Noel Hutchinson

2 votes included wrongly

Special case 18 December 2001 Petition allowed. Election void. First respondent not duly elected.

22 May 2002

Sands End ward of London borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

Colin George Pavelin

Richard Harbord, Stephen James Hamilton

Ballot papers rejected for want of official mark affected result

Special case 31 July 2002. Petition allowed. Election void. Second respondent not duly elected.

23 May 2002

Aston ward, city of Birmingham

Nain Ahmed

Anthony Paul Kennedy, Stewart Dobson

Successful candidate made false statements about petitions for purpose of affecting the result and/or alleged irregularities regarding opening of postal votes

4 October 2002 Petition struck out against second respondent 11 October 2002 Petition struck out against first respondent

23 May 2002

Little Horton ward of Bradford metropolitan borough council

Jamshed Khan

Taj Mubarik Salam, Ian J Stewart

Error in counting votes

29 November 2002 Petition dismissed.

23 May 2002

Cheetham ward, city of Manchester

Habib Ullah, Mohammed Sabir, Basten Ahmed Misbah Begum

Martin Donald Pagel, Andrew Scallen

Requests for proxy votes ignored, personation, delay in taking ballot box to council, comments by first respondent during campaign.

11 October 2002 Petition struck out.

23 May 2002

Peckham ward, London borough of Southwark

Mike Jinnah Rahman, Annette Pallas, Natalie Ajeon

Barrie John Hargrove, William Kayada, Tayo Adelane Situ

Marked register missing, Ballot box late arriving at court, count started before candidates arrived, voters removed from register, confusion over postal votes

29 November 2002 Petition dismissed with consent of first petitioner on behalf of co petitioners.

21 May 2003

Belle Vale and Hasbury ward, metropolitan borough of Dudley

Martin Christopher Knight

Jill Cheryl Nicholls, Andrew Sparke

Failure by R/O to ensure issued ballot papers were delivered in accordance with Part V of Rep of People Regulations 2001

19 December 2003 petition dismissed

21 May 2003

St. Helens borough council in the parish of Sereley Green

Sandra Cleary

Joan Davies, Peter Blackburn

Votes miscounted

Special case 17 October 2003 Election void, Joan Davies not duly elected.

21 May 2003

College ward of Wansbeck district council

James Sawyer

Michael Raymond Kirkup, Robert Stephenson

Votes miscounted block of votes wrongly allocated to candidates

Special case 17 October 2003 Election void, first respondent not duly elected. Petitioner duly elected.

21 May 2003

Broughton and Appleby ward, North Lincolnshire district council

Kenneth Anthony Edgell

Ivan Glover, Michael Garnett

Ballot papers in respect of postal voter wrongly counted(did not bear signature and authentication of voter

4 November 2003 Petition granted. Election void. Ivan Glover not duly elected

23 May 2003

Hartley parish council

Trevor Royston Modell

Christopher Alford

False statements against petitioner issued by respondent calculated to affect petitioners prospects of being re-elected

Lapsed

28 May 2003

Lightwater ward, borough of Surrey-Heath

Lindsey Fellows

Malcolm Bell, Dorothy Drummond, Peter Edward, Harper, Alan Clevely, Mr. Ghandum

Election circulation delivered by Royal Mail to constituents in contravention of RP Act

31 July 2003 Permission to withdraw granted

28 May 2003

Windlesham parish council( Lightwater ward

Lindsey Fellows

Surinder Ghandum, Alan Clevely

Election circulation delivered by Royal Mail to constituents in contravention of RP Act

31 July 2003 Permission to withdraw granted

23 June 2004

Aston ward, Birmingham city council

Ayaz Iqbal, Nagmen Mir, Qadeer Ahmed, Naser Iqbal

Mohammed Islam, Muhammed Afzal, Mohammed Kazi, Lin Homer

Various concerning postal voting

4 April 2005 petition allowed, election void

29 June 2003

Park ward, Calderdale metropolitan borough

C M Saghir, Shakir Saghir, Faisal Saghir

M Najib and 3 ors

All postal ballot pilot failed. Breach of duty. Improper and unfair conduct

22 March 2005 Petition struck out

29 June 2003

Bordesley Green, Birmingham city council

Jamil Akhtar and 3 ors

Shah Jahan and 6 ors

Disputing postal ballot papers (tampering and personation

4 April 2005 Petition allowed, election void

30 June 2004

Derringham ward, Kingston upon Hull

John Philip Considine

John Didrichsen

Various (postal ballot papers

24 November 2004 election void

6 July 2004

Flintshire

Peter Pemberton

Stella Jones

Tyrone Wilcox was disqualified from standing for election

20 December 2004 petition dismissed

Rape Trials

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs

(1) what re-training is given to judges ticketed to try rape; and after what intervals from the date of their ticketing such training is given; [586]

(2) what the contents are of the Judicial Studies Boards serious sexual offence courses; and who is obliged to attend them; [590]

(3) what training on trying rape is given to judges prior to them being ticketed to hear such trials. [595]

Judicial training is the responsibility of the Judicial Studies Board (JSB), an independent body chaired by Lord Justice Keene.

No judge may hear a case involving rape or a serious sexual offence in the first instance without first having received appropriate JSB training, and the designated course for this is the Serious Sexual Offences Seminar (SSOS). Those authorised will be called to continuation training every three years from the date of their first attendance. SSOS is currently designed to cater for both those newly authorised and those receiving continuation training on the basis that a strong element of the training is in the sharing of experiences in general discussions, and in particular during the syndicate work for sentencing and practical problems. However, the question as to whether there should be separate seminars for those attending for the first time, and those receiving continuation training, is kept under review.

The seminar is currently a residential two-day (over three) event and past programmes have included talks on the following:

(1) research into public attitudes to sexual offending and the views of complainants and victims on the way in which sexual offences proceedings are handled.

(2) The policies and practices of the police and Crown Prosecution Service in handling serious sexual offences.

(3) Issues of evidential and procedural law and practice which bear on the conduct of trials in such cases.

(4) Sentencing issues and the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders in the community and in prison. Also included in the programme is a series of discussions, in small groups, of trial and sentencing issues.

In addition, judges of every rank, including the High Court and the Court of Appeal, who exercise the criminal jurisdiction, also received some training on the provisions of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 as part of a programme of training on the Criminal Justice Reforms that ran between January and March 2005. This was supplemented with written material provided at the time the Act came into force.

Newly appointed High Court Judges attend a Serious Sexual Offences Seminar at the earliest opportunity if they have not recently done so in a previous capacity. Further continuation training for High Court Judges is arranged at their request.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what monitoring is carried out of the frequency with which individual judges allow applications to admit previous sexual history in rape trials. [589]

The Government do not monitor decisions made by individual judges in exercise of their judicial discretion.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what proportion of rape trials were cracked at court with the defendant tendering a plea of guilty to a lesser offence during (a) 2003 and (b) 2004. [611]

In 2003 one (0.4 per cent.) case out of 286 cracked at court because the defendant tendered a guilty plea to a lesser offence. In 2004, it was two (0.8 per cent.) out of 254.

Deputy Prime Minister

Business Rates

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether the 2005 business rates revaluation in England was revenue-neutral. [377]

The Local Government Finance Act 1988 limits the increase in the non-domestic multiplier in line with the retail prices index and takes into account losses from appeals over the life of the rating lists. This ensures that no additional revenue is collected purely as a result of revaluation.

The total yield for 2004–05 (provisional outturn) is £16,214 million. Based on current estimates from local authorities, the estimated total yield for 2005–06 is £17,000 million.

Council Tax

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether he expects the 2007 council tax revaluation in England to be revenue-neutral. [278]

The Government set out in its 2001 White Paper "Strong Local Leadership—Quality Public Services" its policy that revaluation should not lead to a change in the overall council tax yield.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what assessment he has made of the effects on (a) the council tax base and (b) council tax receipts of reducing council tax discounts on (i) empty homes and (ii) second homes in England. [281]

According to budget returns from local authorities, reductions in council tax discounts in England for long-term empty and second homes for 2004–05 led to increases in the council tax base of 42,600 and 62,700 Band D equivalent properties respectively.

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister does not collect information on the effect of changes to these discounts on council tax receipts.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the average Band D council tax in (a) county councils, (b) metropolitan councils, (c) unitary councils and (d) London boroughs was in each year from 1997–98 to 2005–06. [291]

The information requested is shown in the following table.

Band D council tax, 2 adults for area -- £(8)

1997–98

1998–99

1999–2000

2000–01

2001–02

2002–03

2003–04

2004–05

2005–06(9)

Shire county

666

738

796

848

903

992

1,129

1,198

1,246

Metropolitan

779

833

878

919

968

1,017

1,098

1,143

1,190

Shire unitary

698

736

779

825

879

958

1,066

1,145

1,197

London

651

687

731

778

841

895

1,058

1,119

1,162

Total England

688

747

798

847

901

976

1,102

1,167

1,214

(8) Amounts shown are headline taxes, before transitional relief and benefits.

(9) Amounts shown for 2005–06 are before capping

Source:

BR1, BR2 and BR3 forms

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether he plans to introduce council tax revaluation transitional relief in England in 2007; and if he will make a statement. [306]

The Government are committed to a transitional relief scheme. They will consult on their proposals for the scheme at the same time as they consult on proposals for revaluing and reforming council tax in the light of the Lyons Inquiry.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the average council tax per dwelling levied in each billing authority in England was in each year from 1997–98 to 2005–06. [356]

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what proportion of local government revenue expenditure in England was financed by council tax in each year since 1996–97; and what the estimated proportion for 2005–06 is. [358]

The proportion of local government revenue expenditure financed by council tax in England each year from 1996–97 is shown in the following table.

Council tax as a percentage of local government revenue expenditure

Percentage

1996–97

22

1997–98

24

1998–99

25

1999–2000

25

2000–01

25

2001–02

25

2002–03

25

2003–04

25

2004–05

26

The data are as reported by local authorities and are taken from outturn figures for 1996–97 to 2003–04 and budget estimates for 2004–05. The figures shown are gross of council tax benefit.

Estimates are not yet available for 2005–06.

HomeBuy

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether the Social HomeBuy scheme is voluntary for housing associations. [366]

The Government's detailed proposals on Social HomeBuy, which would help social tenants to purchase a share in their rented home at a discount, are set out in our consultation document—"HomeBuy—expanding the opportunity to own"—launched on 1 April 2005. The document makes clear that Social HomeBuy will be voluntary for both housing associations and local authorities.

The consultation period ends on 24 June and the aim is to have the new scheme running by April 2006.

Housing (South Hampshire)

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what discussions he has had with (a) the South East England Regional Assembly and (b) the Partnership for Urban South Hampshire and its constituent local authorities on the level of infrastructure required to support the house building targets set out in the draft sub-regional strategy for South Hampshire. [737]

Officials from the Government office for the south-east (GOSE) were invited by the Partnership for Urban South Hampshire to attend their meetings, and have taken a close interest in progress on the strategy for South Hampshire. As a result, South Hampshire was mentioned in the Departments five-year Strategy: 'Homes for All'.

Where local partners want to pursue planned growth that is consistent with existing or emerging Regional Spatial Strategies, and subject to the normal statutory procedures, the Government will support them. Senior officials from GOSE and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister have met with local authority officers in South Hampshire to take forward this commitment.

I have not had any discussions with the Regional assembly on this subject.

Local Government

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether the Government plan to move to a four-year election cycle for local government. [289]

The Government are committed to examining the case for simplifying the current local government election cycle by moving towards 'whole council' elections every four years.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what plans the Government have to conduct future local elections, in whole or part, via remote electronic voting; and if he will make a statement. [376]

I have been asked to reply.

As we made clear in our response to The Electoral Commission's report, 'Delivering democracy? The future of postal voting', laid before the House on 9 December 2004, the Government remain committed to the goal of multi-channel elections, in which voters choices will include e-voting channels. Our strategy for achieving this goal is to encourage local authorities to continue the programme of local electoral pilots, including remote e-voting.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many local authorities in England have schemes allowing councillors to make grants out of public funds; and what monitoring there is of the uses to which such funds are put. [85]

The information requested is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. The discussion document, "Citizen Engagement and Public Services: Why Neighbourhoods Matter" (January 2005), suggests ideas about devolving to each ward's councillors control over a small pot of money for the benefit of that ward.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the timetable is for capping local authorities in 2005–06. [375]

All nine authorities which were designated have challenged the maximum budgets proposed. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is receiving delegations from all the authorities to listen to their cases and will carefully consider both their formal challenges and their representations at the meetings before taking final decisions.

In-year capping is subject to approval by the House of Commons and we aim to have completed any necessary parliamentary stages before the summer recess.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what plans the Government have to amend the local government pension scheme; and if he will make a statement. [284]

A statutory consultation exercise on proposals to amend the local government pension scheme in England and Wales began on 1 April 2005 and concludes on 31 May 2005. Once the responses have been carefully considered a decision will be taken on the next steps. In due course other statutory amendments to the Scheme will come forward within the requirements of the Superannuation Act 1972, and after full consultation with all the interested parties.

London Government

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what plans the Government have to reassess the role of the (a) Government office for London and (b) Greater London authority; and if he will make a statement. [287]

A joint Treasury/Office of the Deputy Prime Minister review is currently taking place on the future role of the Government office network, including the Government office for London. The review's emerging proposals were announced in the 2005 Budget report. The final report will be published later this year.

The Government gave a manifesto commitment to review the powers of the London Mayor and the Greater London authority. We will provide more details on this review in due course.

Negative Subsidy

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how much was taken in negative subsidy from (a) all councils and (b) Chesterfield borough council in each of the last two years. [581]

Total negative subsidy in 2004–05 was £620,543,656. The equivalent figure, representing the total negative housing element for 2003–04 was £706,268,335. Negative subsidy generated by some councils is captured so that it can be redistributed to other authorities with an assumed deficit. It is not retained by central Government.

Negative subsidy for Chesterfield in 2004–05 was £3,559,478. The borough's negative housing element in 2003–04 was £3,508,419.

The definition of negative subsidy was changed by the Local Government Act 2003, which came into force on 1 April 2004. The figures given above are directly comparable, though the terminology changed between the financial years.

Regional Government

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister

(1) what (a) powers, (b) responsibilities and (c) functions the Government have allocated to regional chambers since November 2004; [285]

(2) what plans the Government have to transfer powers and responsibility to the regional chambers; and if he will make a statement. [288]

Regional assemblies have not been given any new powers or responsibilities since November 2004. The Government stated in our manifesto that we would continue to devolve further responsibilities to the existing regional bodies in relation to planning, housing, economic development and transport. We will, as we take forward our regional policies, continue to include the regional assemblies in our considerations.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what role county councils will play in the allocation of housing numbers by district under the new regional spatial strategies. [290]

Regional spatial strategies (RSSs) contain housing numbers by district, and the draft revisions are prepared by the regional planning body (RPB) for the region. RPBs in all regions have not less than 60 per cent. of their members drawn from local authorities, including county councils.

RPBs are required to seek the advice of certain authorities, including county councils when preparing, keeping under review and implementing RSSs, and these authorities are required to give the RPB their advice. These authorities must have the opportunity to prepare the detailed proposals for different provision for different parts of the region, if the RPB decides to make such provision. The RPB must also consult statutory consultees including county councils prior to examination in public of the strategy.

Tenants Rental Payments

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the total revenue received by Chesterfield borough council in tenants' rent payments was in each year since 1997; and what proportion of this revenue was taken by central Government to fund housing benefit. [202]

The rental income received by Chesterfield in each year from 1997 is as shown in the following table, the figures are taken from the audited subsidy claim forms provided by the local authority. Government receipts from rental income are not hypothecated to the benefit system.

Before April 2004 the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) comprised two elements: a housing element and a rent rebate element. Where an authority's housing element generated an assumed surplus, it was offset against the rent rebate element simply as an accounting convenience to ensure simplicity of administration. It did not fund the costs of housing benefit to central Government.

Chesterfield borough council rental income since 1997

Financial year

£

1997–98

18,333,096

1998–99

18,069,527

1999–2000

19,518,000

2000–01

19,331,286

2001–02

20,141,279

2002–03

20,930,604

2003–04

21,176,090

2004–05

21,694,156

Thames Gateway Bridge

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister when he expects to make a statement on the commencement date for the full public inquiry into the proposed Thames Gateway Bridge. [114]

My right hon. Friends the Deputy Prime Minister, First Secretary of State, and the Secretary of State for Transport announced the commencement date for the public inquiry into the proposed Thames Gateway Bridge on 25 February 2005 and reaffirmed it in a further letter on 17 May. The inquiry will open on Tuesday 7 June, 2005 with the initial inquiry sessions held at Charlton Athletic Football Club. Upon conclusion of those first sessions, there will be an adjournment until 13 September, 2005 when the inquiry will reconvene at Woolwich Town Hall, Greenwich.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what representations he has received about the proposed Thames Gateway Bridge; and if he will make a statement. [115]

My right hon. Friends the Deputy Prime Minister and the Secretary of State for Transport, the Planning Inspectorate and the London boroughs of Greenwich and Newham received in the region of 3,000 representations about the Thames Gateway Bridge. The representations came from a wide range of sources including businesses, community organisations and local residents. Of those objecting to the proposal, the issues most frequently raised were:

Lack of choice for different crossing schemes e.g. rail.

Concerns about the information provided in the traffic and transport assessment.

Adverse environmental impacts, that the scheme undermines national and local transport policies.

Traffic will not be local.

Impact on air quality is unclear.

Job creation figures are questionable.

Traffic forecasts are unreliable and the regeneration case for the bridge not proven.

Air pollution, noise pollution and congestion of the existing road network.

Noise impacts, flight paths, flood plain, the future of the Woolwich ferry and community isolation.

Impact on the existing highway network.

Travellers

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what plans the Government have to change planning (a) regulations, (b) legislation and (c) guidelines relating to Travellers. [280]

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister issued a draft for consultation of a new planning circular for Gypsy and Traveller sites in December 2004. We have received over 300 responses and will announce our conclusions when we have considered the representations made on the draft circular. New planning regulations relating to the use of temporary stop notices came into effect on 7 March. Work is under way on new guidance to local authorities and police on enforcement plans.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister when he expects to announce the conclusions of his review of Travellers and planning law. [532]

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister issued a draft for consultation of a new planning circular for Gypsy and Traveller sites in December 2004. We have received over 300 responses and will announce our conclusions when we have considered the representations made on the draft circular.