Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 435: debated on Wednesday 29 June 2005

Written Answers to Questions

Wednesday 29 June 2005

Prime Minister

Laptop Computers

To ask the Prime Minister how many laptop computers have been used by (a) Ministers, (b) special advisers and (c) officials in his Office in each year since 1995; how many have been (i)lost and (ii) stolen in that period; what the cost was of the use of laptops in that period; and if he will make a statement. [4112]

For these purposes my office forms part of the Cabinet Office. I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to her by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster today.

Culture, Media and Sport

Consultants

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what plans she has to issue guidance on effective commissioning for those in the public and voluntary sectors who are commissioning work from external consultants. [7019]

I refer my hon. Friend to the answer given to her on 27 June 2005, Official Report, column 1286W by my hon. Friend the Financial Secretary to the Treasury.

Libraries (London)

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many books were borrowed from libraries in each London borough in each year since 1997. [7475]

The aggregate number of books issued by library authorities across inner and outer London for each year between 1997–98 and 2003–04 is shown in the following table. These figures are drawn from the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy's annual Public Library Statistics (Actuals) which also contain figures for individual library authorities. Copies are available in the House of Commons Library.

Thousand

Number of books issued

1997–98

55,246

1998–99

52,667

1999–2000

48,142

2000–01

45,771

2001–02

42,626

2002–03

41,727

2003–04

39,774

National Lottery

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if she will make a statement on differences in amounts received by constituencies from grants to good causes from the national lottery. [8073]

Policy directions issued by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport state that lottery funding must be accessible to all sections of the population and all areas of the country (especially those at risk of social exclusion).

Ensuring equality of access does not, however, mean that every constituency will receive exactly the same amount. And nor should it. The distribution of national lottery funds was always intended to respond to particular needs and to ensure that areas of significant disadvantage are first to benefit.

Women's Football

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if she will take steps to promote women's football in England. [8378]

The Government have sought to help promote the women's game by working closely with the football authorities and other sporting organisations to raise its profile in this country.

Sport England on behalf of the Government funds the Football Foundation which invests in a wide range of projects that benefit women's football. Sport England has also directly funded girls' football in recent years through the Active Sports programme which has contributed to the 53 per cent. increase in the number of girls playing the game since 2001.

The Government place much importance on women's football and football in general. The sport is a key deliverer of our aims to increase participation in sport, improve social inclusion, community cohesion and the health of the nation.

Work-related Stress

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many cases of work-related stress have been reported in her Department in each of the last three years; how much compensation was paid to employees in each year; how many work days were lost due to work-related stress in each year; at what cost; what procedures have been put in place to reduce work-related stress; at what cost; and if she will make a statement. [7858]

The Department records the number of stress related absences, but the records do not distinguish between stress and work-related stress. The number of stress related cases identified for the last three years are as follows:

Number of cases

Days lost

2002–03

9

712

2003–04

6

251

2004–05

(1)

176

(1)This information has been suppressed on grounds of confidentiality.

DCMS has a legal obligation to provide a safe working environment for all employees and guidance is available for staff and managers on how to manage stress effectively.

No compensation has been paid to employees for any stress related cases in the last three years.

As part of our larger managing attendance, health and welfare programme for staff we have a range of policies and procedures in places to reduce work-related stress.

These include: Stress Management policy: Sickness Absence policy, which includes guidance on making reasonable adjustments; full range of flexible work patterns to support work-life balance; dedicated stress management channel on DCMS Intranet; health awareness pages on Intranet; access to welfare services, onsite gym and yoga classes.

The Department does not hold details of costs for absences resulting from work-related stress or procedures put in place to tackle it.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Animal Welfare

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

(1) what assessment she has made of the welfare conditions of animals used in circuses; and if she will make a statement; [7035]

(2) what plans she has to bring the welfare standards for circus animals up to the same standard as for animals kept in zoos; and if she will make a statement. [7036]

The Government are aware of anecdotal evidence that there are certain welfare problems associated with circuses. The Government's preliminary conclusion is that any such problems can be addressed through better regulation.

Proposals under the Animal Welfare Bill will improve significantly the welfare of animals in circuses. The Bill will introduce a 'duty of care' requiring that the owner or keeper of an animal takes reasonable steps to ensure its welfare and enables action to be taken before any suffering occurs. This will strengthen protection for circus animals.

It is also our intention, through secondary legislation under the Bill, to regulate all trainers of performing animals. No decisions have been taken as to what form the regulation will take but any proposals will be subject to public consultation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment she has made of the legislative position in other European countries in respect of the use of wild animals in circuses; and if she will make a statement. [7448]

The Department is aware that animal welfare laws, including those relating to circuses, vary across Europe.

Badger Deaths (Surrey)

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when she plans to publish statistics on roadside badger deaths in Surrey; and if she will make a statement. [7360]

As Surrey is not one of the seven counties in which DEFRA is conducting its Road Traffic Accident survey, we do not have data on the numbers of badgers killed on Surrey roads.

Energy Technology List (Kilns)

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will take steps to include kilns on the Energy Technology List of the Enhanced Capital Allowance Scheme; and if she will make a statement. [7395]

The Carbon Trust is responsible for providing the Government with technical advice on technologies for the Energy Technology List (ETL). Each proposal for a new technology group is considered and prioritised based on the potential to save carbon dioxide emissions and ease of incorporation within the scheme. To date we have not received any detailed or quantitative proposals to include kilns on the ETL from the relevant industry representatives and our own market assessment indicates that kilns offer relatively low EGA accessible abatement potential compared to other technologies not yet listed. Therefore we have no plans to undertake a detailed evaluation of kilns for the ETL at the moment.

Environment Agency Helpline

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many calls the Environment Agency emergency helpline received in each year since 1997, broken down by the type of problem being reported. [7152]

The Environment Agency does not record the number of calls to the incident hotline, or keep a central log of those calls by subject. Preparing the information from the manually completed record sheets would could be done only at disproportionate cost.

The following schedule shows an approximation of the number of calls received, based on information supplied by BT concerning the total duration of all calls to the hotline, divided by an average duration calculated using figures for April 2005. Unfortunately this information is only available since June 2002.

Number of calls

2002 (June to December)

66,322

2003

136,785

2004

163,696

2005 (January to May)

76,417

Flood Defences

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much is budgeted for expenditure on flood defences in the East Riding of Yorkshire in the next five years; and to which projects funding will be allocated. [6547]

DEFRA funds most of the Environment Agency's flood management activities in England and provides grant aid on a project by project basis to the other operating authorities (local authorities and internal drainage boards) to support their investment in improvement projects to manage flood and coastal erosion risk. Defra does not build defences, nor direct the authorities on which specific projects to undertake.

I understand from the Environment Agency that their budget for expenditure on flood risk management in East Riding of Yorkshire over the next five years is approximately £41 million (at September 2004 prices). This is made up as follows:

Activity/Project

Forecast expenditure (£000)

Ongoing capital investment

Tickton refurbishment

300

Number Estuary Coastal Authorities Group SMP Review

80

Number Monitoring 2

570

Number Estuary Shoreline Management Plan 3

260

Number Land Purchase

3,760

East Clough-Brough Haven

3,130

Little Humber-Thorngumbald

240

Reedness Slips at Reedness

1,200

Goole Slips-River Ouse (Hook Road)

850

Saltmarshe Embankment 2

400

Bank House Slips/Saltmarshe

800

Airmyn and Rawcliffe

2,000

Burstwick Drain

630

Total

14,220

Capital projects resulting from number strategy

Paull Village

3,300

BAe to East Clough

2,900

Old Goole

500

Swinefleet

5,800

Erosion Control (Stoning)

2,100

Monitoring and maintenance

1,100

Further studies

1,700

Contingency for urgent work

2,100

Total

19,500

Asset improvements

1,090

Routine maintenance

2,800

COW expenditure

1,135

Support costs

2,325

Grand total

41,070

For local authorities and internal drainage boards, the forward programme is not budgeted at regional level. DEFRA does however hold forecasts of expenditure of individual approved flood risk management improvement projects covering the period from April 2005 to March 2008. These forecasts total approximately £1 million and are made up as follows:

Authority

Project name

Forecast expenditure (£000)

Cowick IDB

Cowick IDB First Five Year Strategy

94

Goole and Airmyn IDB

Hook Clough Pumping Station

150

Goole and Airmyn IDB

Downs Ground Pumping Station

235

Goole and Airmyn IDB

Downs Ground Pumping Station Refurbishment

300

Market Weighton IDB

Oxmardyke Pumping Station

70

Market Weighton IDB

Foss Dyke and Tributaries

2

Rawcliffe IDB

Rawcliffe First Five Year Strategy

187

Total

1,038

In addition to this list of approved projects for local authorities and internal drainage boards, there are also a number of planned improvement projects that meet the current priority score thresholds but which have not yet been approved for grant aid by the Department.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on progress with the Silkstream Flood Defence scheme, Edgware. [7053]

The Environment Agency is promoting this flood alleviation project. I understand that two of the six flood storage areas have been constructed, these being Temple Pond and Prince Edward Playing Fields (Harrow). Construction work is programmed to commence in autumn 2005 for Summerhouse Lake and Stoneywood Lake. Design and land negotiations for the final two sites, Edgwarebury Park and Bury Farm, are being progressed and underpinned by a Compulsory Purchase Order procedure.

The completion of all flood storage areas is still on target for year 2007, subject to securing the necessary funding and successful negotiations with landowners.

Energy-efficient Housing

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many households have been assisted by the Home Energy Efficiency and Warm Front schemes in the borough of Dartford in each year since June 2000; and what the average size of grant was in each financial year. [7904]

Between the launch of the Warm Front Scheme in June 2000 and the end of the March 2005 the number of households assisted in the borough of Dartford were:

Number

2000–01

101

2001–02

298

2002–03

210

2003–04

157

2004–05

198

Total

964

The average size of grant in each financial year for the Dartford constituency was:

Scheme year

Average grant

2000–01

290

2001–02

324

2002–03

596

2003–04

1,019

2004–05

1,030

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps her Department has taken towards implementing the requirements of section 217 of the Housing Act 2004. [7953]

We are working across Government and with key stakeholders to implement the policies detailed in our 2004 Energy Efficiency Action Plan, which will lead to economy-wide annual savings of 12.1 million tonnes of carbon by 2010. We are looking at ways to further strengthen our energy efficiency policies through the joint HM Treasury/Defra Energy Efficiency Innovation Review and the Climate Change Programme Review, due to conclude later this year.

Sewerage and Water Bills

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the average water sewerage bills are as a proportion of average income in each region. [6293]

Information on water and sewerage bills is not available by economic region. The attached table sets out the average water and sewerage bill as a proportion of average household income in each water and sewerage company area.

2005–06

Regionally

Bill as a proportion of average income (percentage)

Anglian

1.2

Dwr Cymru

1.5

Northumbria

1.2

Severn Trent

1.1

South West

1.8

Southern

1.1

Thames

0.8

United Utilities

1.2

Wessex

1.2

Yorkshire

1.2

Wocs

1.0

Industry average

1.0

Timber

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment she has made of the potential for the recovery of construction and demolition timber as a renewable energy source. [7282]

Information is not available on the amount of construction and timber waste produced each year. Current estimates for all types of wood waste vary from 1.9 to 7.5 million tonnes per annum. This includes municipal, commercial and industrial waste as well as that from construction and demolition. A significant proportion currently goes to landfill, which could be used instead as a valuable energy source. As part of the current review of the renewables obligation, the Government has just consulted on options for incentivising a broader range of mixed waste energy projects. The Biomass Study Task Force, led by Sir Ben Gill, is looking at the barriers to developing biomass energy and will recommend ways to overcome the problems. The use of wood waste as an energy source is one of the areas they are looking at and we will consider the way forward in the light of their recommendations.

International Development

Aid Conditionality

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what steps have been taken to reduce the conditionality of overseas aid; and if he will make a statement. [7786]

The UK Conditionality Policy which I launched in March this year aims to reduce the overall burden of conditionality on developing countries. UK aid will be subject to only three fundamental conditions, which ensure that aid is used to reduce poverty, is not misused through corruption and supports good governance and human rights. We will no longer make UK aid conditional on specific policy choices by partner governments—including in sensitive economic areas such as privatisation or trade liberalisation.

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what steps he is taking to encourage bilateral and multilateral donors to adopt the UK's policy of not placing economic conditions on the aid, loans and debt relief given to developing countries. [7791]

I published a UK policy paper on conditionally in March 2005. Increased transparency about DFID's approach to conditionally and about the conditions that we use will help us to achieve change in other organisations. Last year, I pressed the World Bank to carry out a review of its conditionality. The review will be finalised before the Annual Meetings in September 2005. We have had good discussions with our Nordic Plus partners who are in broad agreement with the principles set out on our policy paper. At country level, when working with other donors, we will encourage others to adopt the approach and principles laid out in our conditionality policy.

HIV/AIDS (Africa)

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what discussions he has hadwith Ministers in recipient countries in relation to HIV/AIDS aid in sub-Saharan Africa. [7787]

Over the past few months my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State and I have met with Ministers and others in a number of African countries to discuss ways of doing more to fight HIV and AIDS prevention, provide better treatment and care, improve and encourage research into protective microbicides and vaccines.

Debt Relief

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what measures he plans to put in place to ensure that heavily indebted poor countries receiving debt relief do not incur heavy debts in future. [7788]

Heavily indebted poor countries that have demonstrated a commitment to poverty reduction are receiving substantial debt relief, and would receive more under the G8 proposal agreed recently.

It is essential that these countries do not build up unsustainable debts again. We have therefore agreed a new arrangement—the Debt Sustainability Framework—to determine whether new assistance should be in the form of loans or grants. We will discuss with partners whether the framework should be adjusted in light of the multilateral relief proposed by the G8.

We are also providing assistance directly to countries to strengthen their debt management capacity.

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what steps he is taking to ensure that funds released by debt relief are used to reduce poverty. [7790]

Debt relief under the heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) initiative, as well as proposed in the recent G8 deal, will go only to countries that have demonstrated their commitment to poverty reduction and good public expenditure management.

On average, 65 per cent. of the savings from HIPC debt relief are used on health and education. There are already many excellent examples of the difference this debt relief can make—after receiving HIPC debt relief in 2001 Ghana has increased spending on reducing poverty by almost 50 per cent. In Uganda, debt relief has seen spent on reducing poverty rise by 75 per cent. since 2000, and access to health services and immunisation rates have almost doubled.

Zimbabwe

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what steps his Department is taking to assist people in Zimbabwe's urban areas. [7789]

It is estimated that 66,000 households (approaching 330,000 people) have been affected by the callous destruction of people's homes and livelihoods by the government of Zimbabwe. DFID have responded to this man-made disaster by providing US$450,000 so far in humanitarian assistance to the most vulnerable. A further contribution is imminent. To date nearly 10,000 families have been reached with food, blankets, soap and other forms of assistance. Where appropriate emergency water and sanitation facilities have been provided. We will continue to press the Government of Zimbabwe to respect human rights and to put a stop to these cruel evictions and arrests.

Palestinian Territories

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what aid programmes his Department has in the Palestinian territories. [7792]

The Department for International Development is working with partners to help end conflict and create a viable Palestinian state that will reduce poverty. The central themes of our programme are to enhance the prospects for peace, promote effective and accountable Palestinian institutions and make international aid and development assistance more effective. We plan to spend £30 million in bilateral aid during 2005–06. Half of our funding will help the United Nations Relief and Works Agency deliver education, health and social services to Palestinian refugees. We will also continue to provide budget support to the Palestinian Authority.

Iraq

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what assistance the Department is providing to Iraq in 2005–06. [7793]

DFID plans to provide £65 million in assistance to Iraq in 2005–06. Our programme is focused on improving infrastructure, including power and water supplies in southern Iraq, and support for public administration, economic reform and participation in the political process in Iraq.

Full details of DFID's programme of assistance in Iraq since April 2003 can be found on the Departments website at www.dfid.gov.uk/countries/asia/iraq.asp

User Fees (Education)

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what steps his Department is taking to ensure that user fees for education are abolished in all countries not on track to meet the millennium development goals. [7794]

DFID supports governments to develop education policies that reduce the financial burden of education for poor families. In Kenya, the recent removal of user fees resulted in over 1 million extra children going to school. We will continue to support countries not on track to meet the education Millennium Development Goals in their efforts to remove user fees for basic education. Over the next three years, DFID plans to spend £1.4 billion supporting education in developing countries. Removing school fees must be part of a plan to ensure the quality of primary education for children is improved.

Asian Tsunami

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development if he will make a statement on reconstruction in the tsunami-affected regions. [7795]

Following a successful humanitarian relief effort, reconstruction after the Asian Tsunami will take several years. Progress is now being made.

In Sri Lanka, 30,000 transitional homes replacing temporary shelters have been constructed so far. Of 182 schools damaged, contracts have been signed to rebuild 176; and roads, railways and electricity supplies have been restored. The recently agreed Joint Mechanism between the Government, the LTTE and Muslims will aid reconstruction in the North East.

Indonesia is still essentially in the relief phase but reconstruction is now beginning through the Aceh Reconstruction Agency. I announced during my recent visit £30 million to be made available to the Indonesian Multi Donor Trust Fund from the £65 million for reconstruction.

Fossil Fuels (International Funding)

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how much has been invested in (a) fossil fuel projects and (b) renewable energy projects by the (i) World Bank Group, (ii) European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, (iii) European Investment Bank, (iv) Asian Development Bank, (v) African Development Bank and (vi) Inter American Development Bank in each of the last five years. [6837]

holding answer 23 June 2005

The following summary table details investment in fossil fuel and renewable energy projects across the major multilateral development banks in the last five years.

Multilateral development bank renewable energy and fossil fuel investments: financial year 2000–04 -- US$ million

Sub-sector

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

World Bank Group

Renewable energy

764

26

349

342

272

Coal (incl mine closure)

51

111

194

75

160

Oil and gas

490

592

601

448

415

Power

1,163

1,169

1,555

852.2

570.2

Other energy sub-sector

176

175

55

170

128

Total fossil fuel

1,880

2,047

2,405

1,545

1,273

Energy efficiency and district heating

254

189

37

68

48

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Renewable energy

0

16

0

0

0

Coal (incl mine closure)

0

0

0

72

0

Oil and gas

142

27

153

35

124

Total fossil fuel

142

27

153

108

124

Energy efficiency and district heating

21

64

92

121

242

European Investment Bank

Renewable energy

78

206

734

375

459

Coal (incl mine closure)

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Oil and gas

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Total fossil fuel

285

285

285

285

669

Energy efficiency and district heating

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Asian Development Bank

Renewable energy

58

6

161

0

0

Coal (incl mine closure)

0

0

0

0

187

Oil and gas

0

0

73

0

0

Total fossil fuel

0

0

73

0

187

Energy efficiency and district heating

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

African Development Bank

Renewable energy

102

79

2

0

0

Coal (incl mine closure)

0

0

0

0

0

Oil and gas

0

0

115

82

0

Total fossil fuel

0

0

115

82

0

Energy efficiency and district heating

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Inter-American Development Bank

Renewable energy

338

186

3

14

75

Coal (incl mine closure)

0

0

0

0

0

Oil and gas

713

192

0

0

0

Total fossil fuel

713

192

0

0

0

Energy efficiency and district heating

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Notes:

1. Figures shown are commitment amounts and not disbursements.

2. Renewable energy is generally defined as hydropower, wind, solar, geothermal and biomass projects.

3. Sub-sector project definitions may vary across institutions and are not directly comparable.

4. Although projects are in fossil fuel sector, this does not necessarily imply a net increase in fossil fuel use. More efficient fossil fuel investments will displace other inefficient fuel or production methods.

5. Coal projects include costs to close mines in an environmental and socially acceptable manner.

6. Figures excludes sole technical assistance projects although technical assistance is a component of loans described.

7. Figures exclude projects solely to support power transmission and distribution.

8. World Bank renewable energy projects include IBRD/IDA/IFC commitments, MIGA guarantees, Bank GEF projects and IBRD carbon finance.

9. EIB investments are for EU members, and also two projects in Swaziland and Morocco.

10. ADB, AfDB, EIB and IDB energy efficiency project information not shown in table.

11. The energy efficiency component of EBRD industrial projects was not recorded before 2002.

12. EBRD and EIB lending figures converted to US$ at $ per Euro 1.205.

13. AfDB figures converted from Unit of Account to US$ at $ per UA 1.4752.

14. IDB loans include loan amounts placed by IDB Private Sector Department with other lenders.

15. IDB renewable energy includes investment in cogeneration facilities.

Solicitor-General

Domestic Violence

To ask the Solicitor-General how many prosecutions for domestic violence in the jurisdiction of the Teesside combined courts have (a) come to court and (b) resulted in conviction in the last 12 months. [7685]

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) records are held according to the CPS unit responsible for proceedings, rather than the court in which the case was heard.

The following table shows the number and outcome of proceedings for domestic violence handled by the Teesside Criminal Justice Unit and the Trials Unit in magistrates courts during the year ending March 2005. During this period, 152 defendants were convicted for domestic violence in the magistrates courts, representing 54.7 per cent. of the total proceeded against. Proceedings in respect of 10 defendants were dismissed after a full trial. All of these prosecutions may be regarded as having come to court. Proceedings in respect of a further 114 defendants were discontinued, while bench warrants for the arrest of two more defendants remained outstanding. These cases may be regarded as not having come to court.

Prosecutions in Teesside Crown court are handled by three CPS units: Durham Trials Unit, Teesside Trials Unit and York Trials Unit. However, CPS units are also responsible for prosecutions in other Crown courts, and it is not possible to disaggregate figures to isolate those relating to Teesside Crown court alone.

A further table shows the number of defendants proceeded against for domestic violence in the crown court by each of the relevant CPS units during the year ending March 2005, and the outcome of the proceedings. The table also shows the proportion of cases resulting in an unsuccessful outcome and in a conviction. In total, 100 defendants were convicted for domestic violence: (73.5 per cent. of the total proceeded against).

All of the Crown court cases shown in the following tables may be regarded as having come to court, with the exception of the one case which could not proceed owing to the death of the defendant.

CPS proceedings for domestic violence in the Crown court 2004–05

Durham Criminal Justice Unit/Trial Unit South

%

Teesside

Trial Unit

%

York

Trial Unit

%

Total

%

Defendant died

1

2.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

1

0.7

Judge ordered acquittal

7

14.3

12

18.8

4

17.4

23

16.9

Judge directed acquittal

0

0.0

2

3.1

0

0.0

2

1.5

Jury acquittal

2

4.1

6

9.4

2

8.7

10

7.4

Total unsuccessful outcomes

10

20.4

20

31.3

6

26.1

36

26.5

Guilty plea

38

77.6

43

67.2

11

47.8

92

67.6

Guilty verdict

1

2.0

1

1.6

6

26.1

8

5.9

Total convictions

39

79.6

44

68.8

17

73.9

100

73.5

Total

49

100.0

64

100.0

23

100.0

136

100.0

CPS proceedings for domestic violence in magistrates courts Teesside: 2004–05

Number

Percentage

Outstanding bench warrants

2

0.7

Discontinued

114

41.0

Dismissed after full trial

10

3.6

Total unsuccessful outcomes

126

45.3

Guilty plea

142

51.1

Guilty verdict

10

3.6

Total convictions

152

54.7

Total

278

100.0

Sexual Offences

To ask the Solicitor-General how many prosecutions for rape and sexual offences have (a) been brought to court and (b) resulted in conviction in the jurisdiction of the Teesside combined courts in the last 12 months. [7686]

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) records are held according to the CPS unit responsible for proceedings rather than the court in which the case was heard.

The following table shows the number and the outcome of proceedings for sexual offences handled by the Teesside Criminal Justice Unit and the Trials Unit in magistrates courts during the period from September 2004, when the present analysis was introduced, to March 2005. During this period, 26 defendants were convicted for sexual offences in magistrates courts, representing 78.8 per cent. of the total proceeded against. Proceedings were discontinued in respect of the remaining seven defendants, whose cases may be regarded as not having been brought to court.

Prosecutions in Teesside Crown court are handled by three CPS units: Durham Trials Unit, Teesside Trials Unit and York Trials Unit. However, these CPS units are also responsible for prosecutions in other crown courts, and it is not possible to disaggregate figures to isolate those relating to Teesside Crown court alone.

A further table shows the number of defendants proceeded against for sexual offences in the Crown court by each of the relevant CPS units. The table also shows the proportion of cases resulting in an unsuccessful outcome and in a conviction. In total, 72 defendants were convicted for sexual offences: (59.5 per cent. of the total proceeded against).

All of the cases shown in the tables for crown court proceedings may be regarded as having been brought to court, with the exception of two cases in which a bench warrant for the arrest of the defendant remained unexecuted.

While CPS records provide an analysis of the number and the outcome of proceedings for sexual offences, these figures cannot be further disaggregated to show the outcome of proceedings for rape.

Information from the Home Office Court Proceedings Database shows that in 2003, in the Teesside Crown Court, 28 defendants were proceeded against for rape of a male and rape of a female, of which nine were found guilty. Data for 2004 will be available in the autumn.

CPS proceedings for sexual offences in the Crown court—September 2004-March 2005

Durham Criminal Justice Unit/Trial Unit South

%

Teesside Trial Unit

%

York Trial Unit

%

Total

%

Outstanding bench warrants

0

0.0

1

1.9

1

2.4

2

1.7

Judge ordered acquittal

3

11.1

9

17.3

6

14.3

18

14.9

Judge directed acquittal

0

0.0

0

0.0

2

4.8

2

1.7

Jury acquittal

5

18.5

15

28.8

7

16.7

27

22.3

Total unsuccessful outcomes

8

29.6

25

48.1

16

38.1

49

40.5

Guilty plea

14

51 .9

23

44.2

19

45.2

56

46.3

Guilty verdict

5

18.5

4

7.7

7

16.7

16

13.2

Total convictions

19

70.4

27

51.9

26

61.9

72

59.5

Total

27

100.0

52

100.0

42

100.0

121

100.0

CPS proceedings for sexual offences in magistrates courts Teesside: September 2004-March 2005

Number

Percentage

Discontinued

7

21.2

Total unsuccessful outcomes

7

21.2

Proved in absence

1

3.0

Guilty plea

24

72.7

Guilty verdict

1

3.0

Total convictions

26

78.8

Total

33

100.0

Treasury

Council Tax

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many (a) successful and (b) unsuccessful appeals against council tax banding have been received in each year since 1997; and how many properties were moved down (i) one, (ii) two and (iii) three or more bands following successful appeals. [7151]

The information is as follows:

Appeals settled in each year for England since 1999–2000 (2)

Unsuccessful

Successful

1999–2000

19,580

26,036

2000–01

14,252

22,205

2001–02

12,808

17,906

2002–03

11,998

17,992

2003–04

12,356

15,364

2004–05

12,350

15,753

(2)The first year this information is available in this form.

Information on specific levels of banding changes relating to these appeals is not currently available.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the average cost of an appeal against council tax banding has been in each year since 1997. [7172]

The average costs of an appeal against council tax banding from 2001–02—the first year for which information is available—are:

£

2001–02

280

2002–03

280

2003–04

300

2004–05

320

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many staff (a) are, (b) have been and (c) will be (i) employed and (ii) contracted out by the Valuation Office Agency to carry out the council tax revaluation process. [7210]

The number of staff employed by the Valuation Office Agency for the council tax revaluation process for England is:

(a) 2005–06: 1, 610

(b) 2004–05: 729

(c) 2006–07: 1,419

(ii) There are no current plans to contract out work from the Valuation Office Agency.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the sources are of the house sales price data the Valuation Office Agency is using for computer modelling as part of the council tax revaluation process. [7586]

The Valuation Office Agency has access to property transaction information from the Stamp Taxes Office of HM Revenue and Customs and from HM Land Registry.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what proportion of dwellings will be assessed by the Valuation Office Agency using the automated valuation model during the council tax revaluation in England. [7587]

The Automated Valuation Model will be used to support the revaluation of the majority of properties within England. Valuation Office Agency staff will use their expertise to review all the outputs.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will place in the Library the specification and technical documentation relating to the automated valuation model used by the Valuation Office Agency for the council tax revaluation. [7590]

The Automated Valuation Model (AVM) is still under development, and so its specification and associated technical documentation is not yet finalised. The Valuation Office Agency will however publish information on this in due course.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate the Valuation Office Agency has made of the number of appeals which are likely to be made following the council tax revaluation in England. [7711]

The number of appeals which may be received following a revaluation are dependent upon a number of issues, which include the characteristics of the banding scheme, the extent of information provided to individual taxpayers about how their assessment has been arrived at, and also the level of payments to be made including whether any transitional relief scheme will apply. A number of these issues are currently under consideration by the Inquiry being undertaken by Sir Michael Lyons which is due to report in December 2005. It is therefore too speculative to provide estimates of appeal rates at this stage.

Faith Communities

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent consultations have been carried out by his Department with representatives of faith communities; and if he will make a statement. [3231]

Comprehensive information relating to consultations with representatives of faith communities is not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Treasury Ministers are concerned to ensure that the views of all sectors of society, including faith communities, are taken fully into account in the process of policy development and analysis. Recent examples of active engagement with faith groups include the tax treatment of Islamic (Shari'a compliant) financial products and the refund of VAT on repairs to listed places of worship.

Flight Charges (African Development)

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what discussions EU finance ministers have had on introducing additional charges on domestic and international flights to fund international development in Africa; what the UK's position is; and if he will make a statement. [5143]

holding answer 20 June 2005

EU finance minister discussions on innovative mechanisms for financing development, including the IFF, the IFF for Immunisation, and an air ticket levy that could support specific development projects and refinance the IFF, are on-going.

The 16–17 June European Council invited the Council to pursue its consideration of the most promising options for innovative sources of funding for development, so as to increase the resources available in a sustainable and predictable manner."

Gershon Review

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what (a) value for money savings consequent on the Gershon review, (b) procurement savings and (c) reduction in civil service posts each Department is expected to make in the fiscal year 2004–05; and if he will make a statement. [7710]

Efficiency targets were set out for each Department in the Spending Review 2004 White Paper. Progress was reported in Budget 2005 and Departments will report on further progress in their annual reports.

Home Owners

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to the answer of 9 June 2005, Official Report, column 681W, on home ownership, what economic analysis was undertaken to underpin the target of one million more homeowners by 2010. [6429]

The Government expect one million people to enter home-ownership over the next five years. This is based upon analysis of recent trends in house-building and new owner-occupiers. It also takes into account the impact that the domestic economic stability delivered by the Government's macroeconomic framework will have had on numbers entering into homeownership.

Insurance Fraud

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations he has received regarding allegations of fraud by insurance companies using the insurance premium tax. [7964]

The Treasury has received no representations regarding allegations of insurance premium tax (IPT) fraud by insurance companies in the past year. Some allegations of underpayment of IPT have been received regarding one particular business and these have been investigated by HM Revenue and Customs.

Mortgage Interest Tax Relief

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the average tax deduction due to Mortgage Interest Tax Relief was in April 1997. [7433]

Property-based Loans

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what contribution to the cost of participation in central Government schemes and services came from equity release or other property-based loans to service users in (a) absolute and (b) percentage terms in the latest period for which figures are available; and what assessment he has made of how this proportion will change over the next 10 years. [6583]

Tax Avoidance Schemes

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer

(1) how many tax avoidance schemes have been withdrawn or otherwise ceased to operate since legislation was brought into force requiring sellers to secure prior clearance from his Department; [7583]

(2) if he will bring forward legislation to require (a) providers and (b) purchasers of tax avoidance schemes to provide a complete inventory of their schemes to his Department. [7584]

The Government are committed to protect the tax system against tax avoidance when and where necessary, ensuring that all taxpayers pay their fair share, and protecting revenues for essential public services. The disclosure rules for direct tax and VAT are a success, informing a number of anti-avoidance measures in the summer Finance Bill.

However, the disclosure rules do not require promoters of schemes to notify HMRC if a tax avoidance scheme has been withdrawn or otherwise ceased, so this information is unavailable.

The Government continue to keep the disclosure rules under review, and will bring forward any further proposals at the appropriate time.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what action his Department has taken against PricewaterhouseCoopers for selling tax avoidance schemes; and if he will make a statement. [8128]

The Government are committed to protect the tax system against tax avoidance when and where necessary, ensuring that all taxpayers pay their fair share, and protecting revenues for essential public services. The Government introduced the disclosure rules for direct tax and VAT in 2004. The disclosure rules are a success, informing a number of anti-avoidance measures in the summer Finance Bill. Among other things, the direct tax rules require promoters to disclose to HMRC that they have made available a scheme or arrangement as defined in the rules. This legislation applies to PricewaterhouseCoopers as it does to any other promoter.

Tax Credit Fraud

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many prosecutions the Inland Revenue has brought for fraudulent tax credit claims in each year since 1997. [4377]

The Government introduced tax credits (working families tax credit, disabled person's tax credit and children's tax credit) in 1999. These were replaced in April 2003 by the new tax credits of working tax credit and child tax credit. There has been a steady increase in prosecutions brought by the Inland Revenue in each year since 1999 as shown in the table. A number of factors contribute to the significant increase in prosecutions:

As more people are eligible to benefit form the new generation of tax credits so there is more scope for fraudulent claims.

HMRC's tax fraud investigators have become increasingly proficient at discovering and preventing fraudulent tax credit claims.

There has been a lead in times from payments being issued, fraud identified and investigated to cases being taken through the court system.

Since the introduction of tax credits in 1999, the Inland Revenue (now HM Revenue and Customs) has prosecuted the following numbers of suspects.

Number

1999–2000

0

2000–01

2

2001–02

28

2002–03

35

2003–04

59

2004–05

211

Valuation Office Agency

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many full-time equivalent staff of the Valuation Office Agency will be employed for the purposes of the council tax revaluation in (a) 2005–06 and (b) 2006–07. [7435]

The number of full-time, equivalent staff, employed by the Valuation Office Agency for the council tax revaluation process in England is:

(a) 2005–06: 1,610

(b) 2006–07: 1,419.

Work-related Stress

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many cases of work-related stress have been reported in his Department in each of the last three years; how much compensation was paid to employees in each year; how many work days were lost due to work-related stress in each year; at what cost; what procedures have been put in place to reduce work-related stress; at what cost; and if he will make a statement. [7874]

The figures for reported cases of work-related stress in the department for the last three years are;

2002: 13 cases resulting in 467 workdays lost

2003: 22 cases resulting in 408 workdays lost

2004: 14 cases resulting in 139 workdays lost

There are no recorded cases of compensation being paid to employees for work-related stress.

A stress audit was carried out in the Treasury in 2000 at a cost of £20,000. To measure progress against the 2000 stress audit, a follow up well being survey was carried out in 2003 at a cost of £15,000. A staff group was set up to assess its recommendations and to take forward an action plan.

Transport

A39

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the funding of the new section of the A39 at Camelford; and if he will make a statement. [7921]

The A39 Camelford Distributor Road was provisionally approved by the Department in December 2000 at a cost of £6.8 million subject to the completion of the relevant statutory procedures and final approval by Ministers.

We are aware that costs for the scheme have increased significantly and are now estimated to be £14.4 million.

We therefore asked Cornwall county council to critically review the current benefit and cost assessment of this scheme in order to satisfy themselves that the scheme can be delivered to minimal additional cost and with a robust BCR. They are currently undertaking this work and future progress of the scheme will depend on the results of this assessment.

A49

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what steps he is taking to reduce road accidents on the A49 between Ludlow and Shrewsbury. [7925]

A number of initiatives have been taken to address safety on the A49 and a Route Management Strategy (RMS) was published in December 2004.

The Highways Agency has recently completed two schemes:

A roundabout junction improvement at Craven Arms

Traffic signal improvements and a vehicle activated speed limit sign at Church Stretton.

A further scheme has been proposed to install a pedestrian crossing facility on the Ludlow Bypass.

In addition, studies have been proposed for 2005–06. These include:

An accident analysis at the Stapleton Crossroads junction south of Shrewsbury and the A49/B4361 junction at the southern end of the Ludlow Bypass

A speed management strategy study for the route as a whole.

Air Services/Travel

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assistance the Government provide to regional airports to establish scheduled services. [7358]

The Department for Transport does not directly provide any financial assistance to regional airports to establish regional air services. However, funding contributions can be made by the devolved Administrations and appropriate regional authorities in certain carefully defined circumstances, provided such funding complies with relevant EU state aid guidelines.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what discussions his Department has had with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on the environmental impact of increasing capacity for air travel. [7729]

The Air Transport White Paper, published in December 2003, set out an approach, agreed across Government, which provides a strategic framework for development of airport capacity, supporting economic prosperity, while managing and mitigating the environmental impacts of aviation. The Department for Transport and DEFRA keep in regular contact on aviation and environment issues.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what estimate he has made of how many extra aircraft (a) per day and (b) per night would (i) fly in and out of Heathrow airport and (ii) pass over Hammersmith and Fulham if the third runway is built at Heathrow. [5893]

Assessments of the additional capacity of Heathrow airport with a short third runway were made in connection with the preparation of the Air Transport White Paper and are set out in the supporting paper Passenger Forecasts—Additional Analysis" available on the DfT website. It is not possible to be specific about how many additional daily flights would pass over Hammersmith and Fulham, since arrival and departure patterns are subject to air traffic control and meteorological conditions. Night-time traffic would be constrained by the night flying restrictions applying at the time at Heathrow.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many passengers transferred or transited at Heathrow between (a) two overseas destinations and (b) an overseas destination and a UK destination in each of the last five years. [6464]

The following table shows passengers transferred at Heathrow between two overseas destinations, an overseas destination and a UK destination in each of the last five years.

Transfer and transit passengers at Heathrow 2000–04 -- Million

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Transfer

International to International

13.7

13.7

16.4

16.4

17.3

International to Domestic

2.8

2.7

3.0

3.1

3.0

Domestic to International

2.4

2.3

2.9

3.4

2.9

Transit

International to International

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

Aviation Policy

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what recent representations he has received from the Sustainable Development Commission regarding the sustainability of the Government's aviation policies; and if he will make a statement. [7394]

The Sustainable Development Commission have recently requested a meeting to discuss the proposals in their input to the Climate Change Programme Review. Their proposals include transport issues. A meeting will take place shortly.

Blue Badge Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what progress has been made in his review of the operation of the blue badge scheme. [8065]

We are working to implement the recommendations for changes to the scheme made by our statutory advisers, the Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee.

These changes involve amendment to both primary and secondary legislation as well as further research in some areas and revised guidance to local authorities.

Primary legislation

Provision for a power to inspect blue badges has been made through Section 94 of the Traffic Management Act 2004. We will be consulting on the guidance for enforcement officers and badge holders during the summer. The new power will be introduced later this year by commencement order once the necessary guidance is in place.

Two other changes have been included in the Disability Discrimination Act 2005. One to change the term 'institution' used in existing blue badge legislation to 'organisation' and another to allow for reciprocity with European Union member states and other countries. These measures are due to be introduced by commencement order at the end of June.

Secondary legislation

We are working on the recommendations requiring changes to regulations (including extending the scheme to children under the age of two and those with temporary disabilities) and we will consult on the draft regulatory package during the summer this year.

Research

We have recently let contracts for the following projects:

Feasibility study into setting up a national database of blue badge holders;

Looking into the independent mobility needs of certain groups of people (e.g. those with autism or mental health problems) to determine whether there is a need for extending the eligibility for a badge; and

Examination of the provision and use of parking spaces for disabled people in the central London area.

Two of the projects are scheduled for completion in December this year and the central London project in February next year, when final reports should be available.

Guidance

New guidance for issuing authorities and badge holders will be produced to cover all aspects of the scheme and issued when changes have been introduced.

Laptop Computers

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many laptop computers have been used by (a) Ministers, (b) special advisers and (c) officials in his Department in each year since 1995; how many have been (i) lost and (ii) stolen in that period; what the cost of the use of laptops in that period was; and if he will make a statement. [4116]

The information requested on the use of laptop computers by officials in each year since 1995 is not available centrally or in the form requested, and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. The number of laptop computers available for use by Ministers, special advisers and their offices since the establishment of the Department for Transport on 29 May 2002 is as follows:

2002: 3 available for use by Ministers and their offices, 2 available for use by special advisers and their offices.

2003: 4 available for use by ministers and their offices, 2 available for use by special advisers and their offices.

2004: 4 available for use by Ministers and their offices, 2 available for use by special advisers and their offices.

2005: 4 available for use by Ministers and their offices, 2 available for use by special advisers and their offices.

Departmental records show the following numbers of lost or stolen laptop computers since the establishment of the Department for Transport on 29 May 2002:

Lost

Stolen

Department for Transport

4

7

Driving Standards Agency

11

Highways Agency

1

10

Maritime and Coastguard Agency

6

5

Vehicle Certification Agency

2

Vehicle and Operator Services Agency

13

Railways

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects a direct rail link between Thirsk and London to be established; and if he will make a statement. [7726]

The Office of Rail Regulation is examining an application from Grand Central Railway to operate a direct rail service from Sunderland to London Kings Cross calling at Thirsk and will announce its findings in due course.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what plans his Department has for the future of sleeper train services in the UK; and if he will make a statement. [7105]

There is no general policy in relation to sleeper services. When considering the specification for each new franchise the value for money and affordability of all services currently provided by that franchise will be considered.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much money his Department has spent on preparatory work on light rail projects in (a) Manchester, (b) Liverpool, (c) Leeds and (d) Portsmouth. [7113]

My Department has provided £119 million to Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive towards the scheme costs for Phase III of Manchester Metrolink. An additional £80 million has been provided to allow GMPTE to buy out the concession for Metrolink.

We are providing £4.2 million towards the preparatory costs incurred for developing the Merseytram Line 1 proposal.

We have provided £6 million to West Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive towards the scheme costs for Leeds Supertram proposal.

We have provided £3 million to the promoters of South Hampshire Rapid Transit towards the scheme costs.

Road Schemes

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much was spent on (a) capital projects, (b) maintenance and (c) improvement schemes on (i)motorways and (ii) trunk roads in (A) West Sussex, (B) Kent, (C) Durham, (D) East Riding of Yorkshire and (E) each English county in each of the last eight years. [7968]

The information cannot be provided as records are not readily available in the format requested and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the (a) cost and (b) location was of each by-pass scheme approved in each of the past 15 years. [6545]

The following table provides information on by-passes that have been fully approved through the Local Transport Plan programme or have entered the Highways Agency's Targeted Programme of Improvements. Information is not held on trunk road by-passes prior to 1997 and prior to 2000 for major local road schemes.

Scheme

(b) Location

(a) Cost

(£ million)

Derby Southern By-pass and Derby Spur

Derbyshire

19.8

Blackburn Southern By-pass Contract I

Lancashire

66

Blackburn Southern By-pass Contract II

Lancashire

80

Stratton By-pass (DBFO)

Wiltshire/Gloucestershire

104.6(3)

Latton By-pass (DBFO)

Wiltshire/Gloucestershire

Market Deeping/Deeping St. James By-pass

Lincolnshire

7.6

Newbury By-pass

Berkshire

73.3

Puddleton By-pass (DBFO)

Devon/Dorset

135.1(4)

Derby Southern By-pass Contract B

Leicestershire

9.6

Polegate By-pass

East Sussex

28.9

Silverstone By-pass (including costs relating to A43 Whitifeld Turn-Brackley Hatch Improvement and M40-B4031 Dualling)

Northamptonshire

107.1

Clapham By-pass

Bedfordshire

43.9

Stainburn and Great Clifton By-pass

Cumbria

12.5

Great Glen By-pass

Leicestershire

20.9

Nesscliffe By-pass

Shropshire

20.2

Basford, Hough, Shavington By-pass

Cheshire

54.3

Rothwell-Desborough By-pass

Northamptonshire

19

Rushden and Higham Ferrers By-pass

Northamptonshire

15.7

Aston Clinton By-pass

Buckinghamshire

44.4

Alvaston By-pass

Derbyshire

22.3

Bingley Relief Road

Bradford MBC

90.5

Selby By-pass

North Yorkshire

66.1

Wadesmill Colliers End

Hertfordshire

40.1

Lamberhurst By-pass

Kent

25.5

Chilton By-pass

Durham

9

Skelton Brotton By-pass

Redcar and Cleveland

16

A4146 Stoke Hammond/Linslade Western By-pass

Buckinghamshire

53.8

Denaby Main Diversion

Doncaster

9

Barnsley Coalfields Link Road

Barnsley

6.5

A57 Cadishead Way (Brinell Drive to City Boundary)

Salford, Greater Manchester

19.9

Carlisle Northern Development Route

Carlisle, Cumbria

78.8(5)

Rearsby By-pass

Leicestershire

7.5

Partney By-pass—scheme part of 3 phases

Lincolnshire

15.5

Gloucester South West By-pass

Gloucestershire

35.7

Barnstaple Western By-pass

Devon

39.9

Broome-Ellingham By-pass

Norfolk

7.09

Great Leighs By-pass

Essex

17.1

Baldock By-pass

Hertfordshire

47.3

A142 Fordham By-pass

Cambridgeshire

12.5

(3)Latest outturn cost for the A417/A419 Swindon to Gloucester DBFO.

(4)Latest outturn cost for the A30/A35 Exeter-Bere Regis DBFO.

(5)PFI.

Stations

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport which train operating companies are participating in the secure station scheme. [8072]

The following 19 train operating companies, including the London Underground, are participating in the secure stations scheme:

Arriva Trains Wales

C2C

Eurostar

First Great Western

Gatwick Station Services

GNER

London and Continental Stations and Property

London Underground—the Tube

Merseyrail

Midland Mainline

Northern Rail

Network Rail

One Railway

Serco Docklands Ltd

Silverlink

Southern

South West Trains

Thameslink

Virgin

Approximately two thirds of all overground rail journeys, one tenth of London Underground journeys and 90 per cent. of DLR journeys involve passengers starting or finishing their journey at a secure station.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what discussions he has had with Network Rail in the last six months about upgrading stations; and if he will make a statement. [5682]

Ministers are exploring with Network Rail what the company might do proactively to further address capacity problems at the larger stations across the network by working with private developers to realise additional development gain. Network Rail advises that further proposals are anticipated for a number of London mainline stations in the near future and that it is working on next stage development projects for smaller stations. These schemes will require works to Network Rail specification, but will build in scope for bidders to reduce the net cost by exploiting development potential.

Vehicle Registration

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the penalties are for failing to have a V5C Vehicle Registration document; and from when they apply. [6720]

A keeper of a vehicle commits an offence for failing to produce a vehicle registration document (V5), or a vehicle registration certificate (V5C) for inspection, if required to do so at any reasonable time, to a police constable or a person acting on behalf of the Secretary of State. A vehicle keeper, if found guilty of this offence, is liable on summary conviction to a maximum fine of £500.

There is no specific penalty for not having the new vehicle registration certificate.

Work and Pensions

Council Tax

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will raise the lower earnings level at which council tax benefit starts to fall below the maximum to the level of the income tax personal allowance; and if he will estimate the cost of making such a change. [7271]

An individual's earnings is only one of several factors affecting council tax benefit entitlement and we have no plans to make such a change.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what proportion of pensioner households paid (a) more than 5 per cent. (b) more than 10 per cent. and (c) more than 15 per cent. of their gross income in council tax in the most recent year for which figures are available. [6766]

The proportion of pensioner households paying(a) more than 5 per cent. (b) more than 10 per cent. and (c) more than 15 per cent. of their household income in council tax for 2003–04, in Great Britain is presented in the following table:

Thresholds

Percentage of pensioner households with

spending on council tax bills as a proportion

of household income above thresholds

(a) 5 per cent.

47

(b) 10 per cent.

12

(c) 15 per cent.

3

Note:

Thresholds are calculated as quotients. The numerator 'council tax spent' is taken as the expenditure on council tax bill net of council tax benefit. The denominator is total household income net of council tax benefit.

Source:

Family Resources Survey (FRS), 2003–04

Home Responsibilities Protection

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions whether a woman who works for a short time during a year when she is otherwise engaged in full-time child care is eligible for continued home responsibilities protection. [7331]

Housing Allowance/Benefit

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will list flat rate housing allowances in each of the allowance pilot areas; what uprating methods are used for each allowance; and how many claimants of each flat rate allowance there are in each pilot area. [6323]

Local housing allowance rates are set according to broad rental market areas and the number of rooms a claimant is eligible to have under the size criteria.

Local housing allowance rates are reviewed monthly by The Rent Service and the amount of local housing allowance payable is the rate that applies at the date of claim for benefit. Local housing allowance is awarded for one year unless a relevant change of circumstances occurs and triggers an earlier review.

The information is in the tables.

Local housing allowance (LHA) rate in Pathfinder areas, by broad market rental area (BRMA) and by type of LHA—June 2005 -- £ per week

Pathfinder area—BRMA

Shared room rate

2 rooms

3 rooms

4 rooms

5 rooms

6 rooms

Blackpool—Fylde

50

77.5

102.5

110

127.5

149

Brighton and Hove

70

130

171

208

237

276

Conwy—North coast

42.5

69

87

98

109

126

Conwy—North rural

40

63

74

82

85

107

Conwy—Menai

42.5

68

85

101

109

115

Coventry

50

92

107

110

121

139

Edinburgh—North

62

104

130

159

194

231

Edinburgh—East

62

101

130

159

200

237

Edinburgh—Central

69

115

147

190

248

306

Edinburgh—South

62

104

133

161

202

237

Leeds

50

83.5

101

113

123.5

137.5

Lewisham—LSE Central

78

155

208

235

280

355

Lewisham—LSE Inner

85

195

235

295

360

425

NE Lincolnshire

43.5

62.5

80

87.5

90

97.5

Teignbridge—Teign

61

87

113

131

150

160

Teignbridge—Exeter

60

101

127

148

165

205

Teignbridge—Tiverton and Crediton

58

84

107

127

149

163

Teignbridge—Torbay

63

95

120

136

150

165

Teignbridge—South Devon

59

93

118

133

153

162

Teignbridge—Plymouth Environs

58

89

104

121

133

153

Source:

Data provided by The Rent Service, June 2005.

Number of claimants by local housing allowance type in each pathfinder area—November 2004

Shared room rate

2 rooms

3 rooms

4 rooms

5 rooms

6 plus rooms

All

Blackpool

690

3,740

1,790

400

500

210

7,320

Brighton and Hove

1,580

3,690

1,760

340

220

110

7,690

Conwy

170

880

400

80

90

40

1,660

Coventry

410

970

860

180

280

120

2,830

Edinburgh

870

2,110

1,800

330

300

130

5,520

Leeds

980

1,660

1,140

240

350

200

4,570

Lewisham

1,010

1,070

760

190

210

90

3,340

North East Lincolnshire

330

1,400

1,350

330

380

140

3,940

Teignbridge

140

660

420

110

90

(6)

1,440

All

6,170

16,180

10,270

2,200

2,430

1,060

38,300

(6)Nil or negligible.

Note:

Figures are rounded to the nearest 10 and may not sum due to rounding.

Source:

DWP administrative data for Pathfinder data November 2004.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions in what percentage of housing benefit claims a rent officer determination was involved in the last period for which figures are available, broken down by local authority area. [5447]

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the average time taken to process a housing benefit claim in the (a) private sector and (b) registered social landlord sector was in the last period for which figures are available, broken down by region. [5457]

The information is in the table.

Average time (calendar days) taken to process a housing benefit claim in the private sector (PRS) and registered social landlord sector (RSL) in the fourth quarter of 2004–05

Government office region

PRS claims

RSL claims

East Midlands

43

33

Eastern

52

35

London

52

40

North East

46

36

North West

39

32

Scotland

43

30

South East

43

30

South West

41

32

Wales

62

41

West Midlands

42

39

Yorks and Humberside

42

34

National average

46

34

Note:

Not all local authorities have returned data in every quarter; the reported figures are the weighted averages of those that have returned figures.

Source:

Local authority statistical returns.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what safeguards are in place to protect vulnerable claimants in the housing benefit pathfinders; and if he will make a statement. [5460]

One of the aims of the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) is to promote personal responsibility and financial inclusion. As such the majority of customers will receive their LHA direct, and make their own arrangements to pay their rent to their landlord.

However, in recognition of the risk that some tenants may struggle with this responsibility, safeguards have been put in place. Pathfinder authorities have the discretion to make the payment to the landlord in certain circumstances, where there is a history of vulnerability or failure to pay their rent.

The local authorities implementing LHA have received guidance on when paying LHA to the tenant is likely to be inappropriate, but have the discretion to decide each case on its merits.

In addition, current regulations allow for housing benefit to be paid directly to the landlord where a tenant accrues at least eight weeks rent arrears; this provision is extended to the LHA scheme.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of the proportion of benefit claimants who have (a) lost and (b) gained as a result of the introduction of the local housing allowance, broken down by Pathfinder area; and how much on average such claimants have (i) lost and (ii) gained, broken down by Pathfinder area. [5461]

There are no losers on the Local Housing Allowance in the Pathfinder areas. Claimants who would have been financially worse off under the Local Housing Allowance compared to the old housing benefit system are transitionally protected.

Information on those who are financially better off under the Local Housing Allowance compared to under the old housing benefit system is currently not available.

The Department has commissioned a comprehensive, independent evaluation of the Local Housing Allowance Pathfinders. This will provide information on the impact of the Local Housing Allowance, including information about gainers. The first interim findings of the evaluation are being published over the summer and the results of the final evaluation will be published at the end of next year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the average time taken to process a housing benefit claim was when a rent officer determination (a) was involved and (b) was not involved in the last period for which figures are available, broken down by local authority area. [5466]

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what percentage of housing benefit claimants rent from the private sector in each of the housing benefit Pathfinder areas. [5471]

The information is in the table.

Housing benefit private tenants by Pathfinder—February 2005(7)

Local authority

All privatetenants(7) tenants

Percentage of total housing benefit recipients that are privatetenants(7) tenants

Blackpool

9,100

62.1

Brighton and Hove

9,900

42.7

Conwy

2,700

39.9

Coventry

5,300

24.2

Edinburgh

7,300

21.5

Leeds

7,500

13.9

Lewisham

5,200

18.2

North East Lincoln

4,900

40.1

Teignbridge

2,500

44.3

(7)Excluding registered social landlords.

Notes:

1. The data refer to benefit units, which may be a single person or a couple.

2. The caseloads are rounded to the nearest hundred and percentages are given to one decimal place.

3. Figures for any non-responding authorities have been estimated.

4. Housing benefit figures exclude any extended payment cases.

Source:

Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit Management Information System Quarterly 100 per cent. caseload stock-count taken in February 2005.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many housing benefit recipients in the pathfinder areas have built up rent arrears of eight weeks or more following the introduction of direct payment; in which pathfinder areas they are located; and what the total amount of arrears is in each pathfinder since the introduction of the local housing allowance. [5475]

The information is not available for housing benefit. The available information for the local housing allowance is in the table.

Local housing allowance recipients in the pathfinder areas who built up rent arrears of eight weeks or more, February 2005

Pathfinder

areas

Number of

LHA claimants

Number of

LHA claimants

with 8 weeks or

more rent arrears

Proportion of

LHA claimants

with 8 weeks or

more rent arrears (%)

Blackpool

8,140

630

8

Brighton and Hove

8,210

200

2

Conwy

1,990

30

2

Coventry

3,600

100

3

Edinburgh

5,940

50

1

Leeds

5,900

280

5

Lewisham

3,670

190

5

North East Lincolnshire

4,220

110

3

Teignbridge

1,870

30

1

All pathfinders

4,540

1,620

4

Notes:

1. There are differences between local authorities in classifying rent arrears. Therefore, the data reported may be over or underestimate of the actual situation.

2. The reported percentages in pathfinder areas vary between 1 per cent. and 8 per cent. and the average may be over or under estimated.

3. The data reported is a snapshot (mid February 2005) and not a full count of a quarter.

Source:

DWP administrative data for Pathfinder areas. February 2005.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the average standard housing allowances are in each of the housing benefit pathfinder areas, broken down by household type. [5478]

The available information is in the table.

Average local housing allowance amount for claimants in each Pathfinder area broken down by household type -- £ per week

Couple (under 60) with children

Couple (under 60) no children

Single (under 60) with children

Single (under 60) no children

Single pensioner

Couple pensioner

All

Blackpool

114

79

105

72

75

79

86

Brighton

193

127

176

106

117

130

129

Conwy

96

71

89

62

65

68

73

Coventry

119

91

107

73

79

89

92

Edinburgh

171

111

147

94

99

114

120

Leeds

119

84

109

72

77

88

88

Lewisham

247

151

223

115

131

164

158

North East Lincs

87

67

79

64

64

66

73

Teignbridge

126

87

114

75

81

82

95

All

144

94

129

88

89

91

105

Notes:

1. Household status refers only to the claimant.

2. Local housing allowance amount refers to the maximum amount a claimant is eligible to receive. The amount of benefit a claimant actually receives may differ because of their circumstances.

3. Due to data concerns the table does not include the full local housing allowance caseload.

Source:

DWP administrative data for Pathfinder data November 2004, DWP income support data October and November 2004, DWP pension credit data Nov 2004, DWP jobseeker's allowance data Nov 2004.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

(1) what the level of (a) fraud and (b) error in housing benefit payments was as a percentage of housing benefit expenditure in each year since 1997; and what sums were involved in each case in each year, broken down by (i) region and (ii) local authority area; [5487]

(2) what the total amount of overpayments of housing benefit was in each year since 1997, broken down by region. [5452]

The Department has undertaken continuous measurement of housing benefit fraud and error since 2002–03. The latest available headline information was published in the report Fraud and Error in Housing Benefit, April 2002 to March 2004, Part One" on 24 February 2005.

Information is not available at local authority level. Information at regional level is contained within the supplementary report, Fraud and Error in Housing Benefit, April 2002 to March 2004, Part Two", which was published on 26th May 2005.

Both reports are in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what plans he has for further changes to the single room rent restriction. [5630]

There are no current plans to change the housing benefit single room rent restriction. However, under the local housing allowance, young people who would otherwise have been subject to the single room rent are entitled to the new shared room rate. This is based on a more generous definition than the existing single room rent.

The impact of this new rate will be assessed as part of the evaluation of the local housing allowance in nine pathfinder local authority areas. This evaluation will help inform national roll out.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what his most recent estimate is of the effect on the level of average housing benefit of the single room rent restriction. [5632]

The information is not available in the format requested. However, as at February 2005 the average weekly housing benefit award for cases assessed under the single room rent was £48.73.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the average housing benefit payment in each housing authority area in the North East was in November (a) 2000, (b) 2001, (c) 2002, (d) 2003 and (e) 2004. [6324]

The information is in the table.

Average weekly amount of housing benefit in north-east local authorities: November 2000 to 2004 -- £

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

North East GOR

40.19

42.36

45.78

45.06

47.68

Alnwick

37.26

38.64

40.56

42.46

43.72

Berwick upon Tweed

36.27

38.66

40.14

42.25

43.78

Blyth Valley

35.83

37.65

40.16

40.63

41.84

Castle Morpeth

37.67

39.60

41.61

44.73

46.05

Chester le Street

36.61

38.68

40.73

41.70

45.29

Darlington

43.08

46.20

51.02

49.51

51.91

Derwentside

41.34

44.37

43.49

43.69

46.27

Durham

37.78

39.70

43.23

42.96

45.70

Easington

36.08

38.45

40.20

40.81

44.53

Gateshead

36.46

39.44

41.96

43.67

45.11

Hartlepool

42.31

44.76

46.73

47.26

49.57

Middlesbrough

45.76

48.15

51.55

50.75

52.87

Newcastle upon Tyne

43.29

45.69

51.22

47.80

49.82

North Tyneside

38.64

41.33

46.90

45.22

47.11

Redcar and Cleveland

41.98

43.52

45.52

48.25

50.92

Sedgefield

37.44

39.62

42.56

43.42

45.73

South Tyneside

38.23

37.47

38.46

35.91

42.41

Stockton on Tees

42.11

44.49

47.22

47.01

50.15

Sunderland

41.47

44.12

50.03

47.10

49.91

Teesdale

41.53

43.08

45.11

45.39

46.64

Tynedale

38.41

41.46

43.99

45.79

47.14

Wansbeck

33.14

35.10

36.79

38.96

40.25

Wear Valley

39.15

41.10

45.45

45.34

46.85

Notes:

1. The data refer to benefit units which may be a single person, couple or family.

2. The figures are shown to the nearest penny.

3. Figures for any non-responding authorities have been estimated.

4. Housing benefit figures exclude any extended payment cases.

Source:

Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit Management Information System Quarterly 100 per cent. caseload stock-count taken November 2000 to 2004.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the average time in England was for processing (a) initial housing benefit claims, (b) changes of circumstances in existing claims, (c) claims for council tax benefit and (d) changes of circumstances for council tax benefit, in the last year for which figures are available, broken down by local authority. [6415]

Rent Arrears

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

(1) what the total amount of rent arrears of housing benefit recipients was in each year since 1997, broken down by local authority area; [5437]

(2) how many housing benefit recipients have been evicted for rent arrears in each year since 1997, broken down by local authority area; [5438]

(3) what estimate he has made of the number of households which accumulated rent arrears as a result of the time taken to process housing benefit claims in each year since 1997, broken down by local authority area. [5446]

Unemployment Levels

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

(1) what estimate he has made of the effect on levels of unemployment since 1997 of (a) the new deal and (b) Jobcentre Plus initiatives; and if he will make a statement; [814]

(2) what his estimate is of the effect of the new deal on the claimant count for unemployment; and if he will make a statement. [967]

The development of Jobcentre Plus is building on the high quality service already provided by social security offices and Jobcentres. The new offices deliver a single, integrated service with a clear focus on work to all people of working age. As a result of a strong economy and our active labour market policies, we have record levels of employment and the lowest sustained levels of unemployment for 30 years. The new deal has helped well over a million people to find jobs, and is giving people in all areas of the country the help and support they need to move off benefits and into work.

The Jobcentre Plus client base has changed considerably over the past few years. Since May 1997 claimant unemployment has roughly halved and, as at April 2005, the UK claimant count stands at 839,400, down 782,200 (48 per cent.) since the 1997 election. The claimant unemployment rate is 2.7 per cent.; down 2.7percentage points since the 1997 election.

ILO unemployment in the UK stands at 1.40 million (January-March 2005), down 654,000 (32 per cent.) since the 1997 election. The ILO unemployment rate is 4.7 per cent. down 2.5 percentage points since the 1997 election.

The number of lone parents on benefit is down 20 per cent. to 763,000. Youth claimant unemployment has fallen by two-fifths, to its lowest level for 30 years; the number of 18 to 24-year-old claimants unemployed for more than a year has fallen by over 90 per cent.; and long-term adult unemployment (two year plus) has been cut by three quarters to its lowest level for 30 years.

House of Commons Commission

Work-related Stress

To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission how many cases of work-related stress have been reported among House staff in each of the last three years; how much compensation was paid to employees in each year; how many work days were lost due to work-related stress in each year; at what cost; what procedures have been put in place to reduce work-related stress; at what cost; and if he will make a statement. [7867]

The Parliamentary Occupational Health, Safety and Welfare Service (OHSWS) have been recording cases of work-related stress as a separate category from other cases of stress only since the latter part of 2003; therefore accurate statistics are only available for 2004. In that year six cases were dealt with, representing approximately 0.38 per cent. of the House work force. Subsequent benchmarking has confirmed this to be a relatively low figure. Departments of the House and the OHSWS have proactively sought to support such staff, and consequent absence from work has been low. Long-term absence has been the exception rather than the rule. In most cases of reported stress, work is one of a number of contributory factors, including personal problems. No cases have resulted in civil action and resultant compensation.

Over the past year OHSWS have been leading a review of how the House manages and supports staff concerning issues of stress and wellbeing. Extensive research, benchmarking and gap analysis shows that appropriate support mechanisms are in place for staff. The House is committed to continuous improvement and implementing best practice, and the arrangements for minimising, recognising and managing stress at work are currently under review.

No estimate has been made of the cost of days lost as a result of work-related stress, or of the measures to deal with it.

Defence

Bullying/Harassment

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) how many of the complaints under Army redress procedures upheld or partially upheld between 1997 and 2003 related to issues of bullying or harassment; and how many (a) officers, (b) non-commissioned officers and (c) private soldiers were disciplined as a result; [2061]

(2) how many complaints have been considered by the Army Board from soldiers who are serving, or who have served, at (a) Deepcut Barracks and (b) ITC Catterick since 1997; and how many of these complaints related to issues of bullying or harassment. [2055]

Bullying is not a criminal offence, nor a clearly defined form of behaviour; there are various definitions that cover all forms of harassment, abuse or intimidation. Furthermore, complainants do not use a standard form of words and cases are recorded using the wording adopted by those making a complaint or seeking redress. Consequently, we are unable to identify every allegation, complaint or investigation that involves bullying without conducting a trawl of individual case records and archives, held in various databases and paper files. Our records do not lend themselves to the kind of analysis which these questions demand. Essentially, we would need to examine every case considered by the Army Board and make a judgment as to whether bullying or harassment were significant factors in the complaint. This would be extremely time consuming and it may not be immediately apparent whether this is the case or not. The scope for interpretation may also be quite wide. However, we have undertaken a rudimentary electronic search of our databases and spreadsheets to ascertain which complaints record allegations of bullying or harassment. This has highlighted eight cases, none of which relate to complaints upheld or partially upheld, by the Army Board.

None of the eight cases referred to relate to incidents alleged to have taken place at either Deepcut or Catterick.

Dentistry

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the availability of military dental practitioners in the services to practise on reserve forces personnel; and whether his Department's policy has changed on the use of military dental practitioners by reserve forces personnel. [5320]

Reserve forces personnel are entitled to treatment on operations and exercises and during periods of military training. Dental teams are established at Chilwell to undertake initial dental examination and to provide urgently required treatment (if time allows) for reserve forces personnel called forward for deployment. There is no spare capacity within the Defence Dental Services to routinely treat reserve forces personnel.

Military Readiness

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the finding of the National Audit Office report Assessing and Reporting Military Readiness, paragraph 2.22, concerning the land contribution to any Joint Rapid Reaction Force; what land contribution the UK is able to make to such a force; what units are potentially available at the moment in extremis; and what limitations are being imposed by the factors mentioned in the paragraph. [7550]

It is accepted that our continued commitment to operations in Iraq is impacting on the Army's ability to recuperate all land elements of the Joint Rapid Reaction Force (JRRF). Under routine circumstances, the Army would maintain the following contingent land forces: a brigade sized grouping held at High Readiness; and two Strategic Reserves—the Spearhead Land Element (SLE) held at Extremely High Readiness and the Airborne Task Force (ABTF) held at Very High Readiness.

Since Operation Telic commenced the High Readiness Brigade has been routinely deployed to Iraq and has therefore been unavailable to the JRRF. Nonetheless, the SLE and ABTF have been maintained throughout.

Napalm Weapons (RAF Fairford)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will ensure that United States planes flying out of RAF Fairford do not use MK 77 napalm weapons. [7275]

The operational use of the United Kingdom bases, including RAF Fairford, by the United States forces is a matter for joint decision by the UK and US Governments. It is not our practice to speculate or comment on specific aspects, such as weapons systems.

RAF Relocations

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the cost will be of the re-locations of other service units located at RAF Innsworth following the relocation of Personnel and Training Command to RAF High Wycombe; and if he will list the proposed locations of these units. [6709]

An element of the Armed Forces Personnel Administrative Agency (AFPAA) is located at RAF Innsworth. AFPAA are carrying out a separate investment appraisal into the options for their relocation from Innsworth. The results of this will not be known before the end of the year.

Regimental Uniforms

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 24 May 2005, Official Report, column 56W, on regimental uniforms, what the life expectancy is of each uniform; what the initial outfit allowance is for the (a) English, (b) Welsh and (c) Scottish Infantry regiments; when the last increase in initial outfit allowance was made; and what the previous allowance was. [3254]

An Officers' Outfit Allowance is awarded on commissioning to allow officers to purchase their first uniform. Officers joining the majority of English and Welsh infantry regiments receive the standard allowance of £2,122.

For those joining certain regiments the allowance is adjusted in line with the type, and therefore cost, of their uniform, which varies across the Infantry. Those English, Welsh and Scottish infantry regiments where the Officers' Outfit Allowance differs from the standard rate are the Foot Guards (£2,774), the Lowland Regiments (£2,057), the Highland Regiments (£2,510), the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers and the Parachute Regiment (both £2,032).

The Officers' Outfit Allowance was raised to its current level in 1994. Before this all newly commissioned officers into the infantry regiments received an allowance of £1,945 with the exception of those joining the Foot Guards (£2,706), the Lowland Regiments (£1,930) and the Highland Regiments (£2,330).

Officers' uniforms do not have a specific life expectancy as such. All uniforms are chosen on the basis that they are hard wearing and suitable for the tasks demanded of them. Officers are expected to keep their uniform in good order and maintain and replace accordingly. To do this an annual tax credit is awarded, based on the initial Outfit Allowance. This allows officers to purchase a new Service uniform approximately every five years.

Trafalgar Class Vessels

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 13 June 2005, Official Report, column 18W, on Trafalgar Class Vessels, what the theoretical safety concern and safety justification involved were; and if he will make a statement. [6035]

It is an essential, mandatory and routine requirement to operate a Royal Navy nuclear submarine, that a safety justification is maintained which demonstrates it is safe to do so. This requires any issues potentially affecting the safe operation of the submarine, including theoretical ones, to be considered.

The theoretical safety concern on HMS Torbay and HMS Tireless centred on the potential effect of a number of small manufacturing imperfections in their nuclear reactor plant. A previous analysis had indicated that these imperfections were acceptable but a more modern analysis, using the latest information on material properties and component stress values, showed an increased theoretical risk of failure in some of these components. While there was no new defect, as part of the Royal Navy's commitment to safety, the decision was taken that the two submarines should not be operated further until the technical aspects had been fully examined and their continued safe operation could be justified. For HMS Torbay a safety justification is now in place to allow the operation of her nuclear reactor plant. The safety justification work required for HMS Tireless will be undertaken during her programmed maintenance and upgrade period, which is under way at Devonport.

Trade and Industry

Airbus A350

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the requests he has received regarding launch investment for the development of the Airbus A350; what assessment he has made of the implications of this project for the UK economy; and if he will make a statement. [7297]

Airbus UK has formally submitted an application for launch investment, the terms of which are strictly confidential. It would not be appropriate to make a statement at this stage.

Broadband (East Sussex)

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what representations he has received regarding broadband access in East Sussex; and if he will make a statement. [7855]

I am not aware of any recent correspondence relating specifically to East Sussex, though there is considerable correspondence about broadband. Great progress has been made in terms of broadband across the country, by the end of this summer over 99 per cent. of the population will have access. Activity to address the remaining gaps in coverage is taking place regionally.

I am pleased to say that access in East Sussex is extensive. All telephone exchanges except one are enabled for broadband and that one (Isfield) has a commercial wireless service which was installed about a month ago.

MG Rover

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will publish (a) the written recordings of conversations and (b) correspondence between (i) Ministers and (ii) officials from his Department and senior members of MG Rover's management that took place in the week commencing Monday 4 April. [5867]

It would be inappropriate to release this information at this time as it would breach commercial confidentiality and may prejudice the position of the administrators.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether (a) he and (b) officials in his Department are in continuing discussions with the Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation. [5872]

Since SAIC made it clear they were not interested in pursuing a deal in the week following MG Rover's entry into administration, there has been no contact with SAIC by the Secretary of State or DTI officials as regards MG Rover.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry whether he is in continuing discussions with the former senior managers of MG Rover. [5873]

There has been no ongoing contact between the Secretary of State and the former directors of Phoenix Venture Holdings since MG Rover's entry into administration.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the impact of the collapse of MG Rover on Rover dealerships; and if he will make a statement. [5874]

The collapse of MG Rover has had a devastating effect on MG Rover retailers. In response to this a sub-Group of the MG rover task force was set up. The sub-Group is chaired by Digby Jones, director general of the CBI and its membership is drawn from senior industry figures, the key trade associations, and Government officials. The sub-Group's role is to consider the impact of recent events on franchised dealerships and other retailers and service providers in the retail automotive sector. Progress to date includes:

Advantage West Midlands have agreed to extend access to the Advantage Transition Bridge Fund' to franchised dealers. Loans of £50,000 to £500,000 will be available to those facing financial difficulty and having a viable recovery plan but insufficient finance from normal sources to implement it;

HM Revenue and Customs are now applying the same approach to retailers as to suppliers as regards 'time to pay agreements' on VAT and PAYE, including to address the impact of VAT payable on bad debt. This includes pro-active calls to vulnerable retailers to discuss possible assistance;

The Learning and Skills Council are ensuring that apprentices released by MGR retailers will be found alternative placements and funding;

Job Centre Plus has agreed that those made redundant from retailers will be provided with their enhanced rapid response service, as being provided to MGR employees and those of suppliers; and

Business Link has confirmed that they stand ready to provide business planning and other advice to the retail sector via their regional network

The sub-Group continues to meet to monitor the situation and make recommendations to the Secretary of State on appropriate action to address the particular circumstances of the retail sector.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will publish the findings of the Financial Reporting Council concerning MG Rover; and if he will make a statement. [5875]

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham, Selly Oak (Lynne Jones) on 15 June 2005, Official Report, column 412W.

Permanent Secretary

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what the reasons were for the decision by his Department in February to delay the appointment of a permanent secretary until later in the year; whether this decision was announced publicly; and when he expects to announce the appointment of a new permanent secretary. [6639]

I have been asked to reply.

The decision not to appoint was taken in light of the need to consider the broader picture of permanent secretary moves over the summer including the retirement of Sir Andrew Turnbull. Both No. 10 and Department of Trade and Industry issued press notices on 8 February 2005. The appointment will be settled in the next few months.

Home Department

Crime (Middlesbrough)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many cases of identity fraud have been recorded in Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland constituency in each of the last three years. [5903]

Offences of identity fraud cannot be separately identified in the recorded crime series and the information requested is therefore not available centrally.

Identity Cards Bill

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether a registered person would have the right to see the audit trail of information held on him under Schedule 1, paragraph 9 of the Identity Cards Bill. [6785]

holding answer 23 June 2005

Schedule 1, paragraph 9 of the Identity Cards Bill allows for a record of every occasion on which information has been provided to a third party, and details of who that third party was, to be kept on the National Identity Register.

Private organisations requesting verification of identity from the National Identity Register can only do so with the consent of the registered individual. Information can only be supplied without consent in the specific circumstances outlined in CI. 19–23 of the Identity Cards Bill.

The individual will always have subject access rights under the Data Protection Act 1998, subject to any exemptions within that Act, to information in their entry. This would include the information held on that individual under Schedule 1, paragraph 9 of the Identity Cards Bill.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department for what percentage of persons registered in the National Identity Register he estimates (a) no biometric information and (b) no biometric information other than the face biometric would be recorded, broken down by (i) ethnicity, (ii) socio-economic group, (iii) occupation and (iv) age. [6786]

As biometric technology is constantly evolving and improving, it is not possible to give a precise estimate until technology performance requirements are established and equipment is procured for the Identity Card Scheme. The most recent research figures are from the UKPS biometric trial. However, this was not intended as a test of technology and the equipment used will have evolved significantly by the time the Identity Cards Scheme is introduced. Nevertheless, the trial did demonstrate that the number unable to record any biometric information is statistically small and special arrangements, including improved enrolment facilities are being considered for this group. Specifically, the result of this trial demonstrated that, of the total sample, 99.954 per cent. of participants could successfully record at least one biometric successfully. 0.29 per cent. of the entire sample were only able to record the facial biometric on its own. The following tables show the enrolment rates broken down by ethnicity, age and socio-economic group. References in the tables to the face failure rate refers only to the first attempt—virtually all individuals were successful after multiple attempts but these figures are not available in the report. The iris and fingerprint figures were for multiple attempts. In addition, the trial results provided some breakdowns for successful enrolment of each individual biometric by ethnicity, socio-economic group and age, although no breakdown provided for the provision of all three and there is no breakdown by occupation. Nor were there breakdowns for the requested groups for those who could provide no biometric information other than face. The relevant information which was recorded during the trial is shown in the following tables. Reference to face failure rate refers to only the first attempt—virtually all were successful after multiple attempts but no figures were provided in the evaluation report.

Successful enrolment rates

Percentage

Ethnicity

Fingerprint

Iris

Face

Asian

99.07

88.09

96.91

Black

97.72

81.01

93.06

Chinese/East Asian

100.00

85.05

95.50

White

99.37

91.33

95.24

Other

99.25

90.11

96.22

Note:

Figures from Quota and Opportunistic Groups

Percentage

Age

Fingerprint

Iris

Face

18–24

98.96

90.89

97.63

25–34

99.10

93.48

97.16

35–44

99.46

94.41

95.89

45–54

99.46

92.23

95.58

55–59

99.07

91.31

95.06

60–64

99.41

86.81

94.92

65 plus

99.32

78.27

95.95

Note:

Figures from Quota and Opportunistic Groups

Socio-economic group

Fingerprint percentage

A

100.00

B

98.70

C1

98.39

C2

99.48

D

98.00

E

97.30

Notes:

1. Figures for Quota Group only.

2. Iris and face successful enrolment rates broken down by socio-economic group were not part of the terms of reference for this part of the study.

Unsuccessful enrolment rates

Percentage

Ethnicity

Fingerprint

Iris

Face

Asian

0.93

11.91

3.09

Black

2.28

18.99

6.94

Chinese/East Asian

0.00

13.95

4.50

White

0.63

8.67

4.76

Other

0.75

9.89

3.78

Note:

Figures from Quota and Opportunistic Groups.

Percentage

Age

Fingerprint

Iris

Face

18–24

1.04

9.11

2.37

25–34

0.90

6.52

2.84

35–44

0.54

5.59

4.11

45–54

0.54

7.77

4.42

55–59

0.93

8.69

4.94

60–64

0.59

13.19

5.08

65 plus

0.68

21.73

4.05

Note:

Figures from Quota and Opportunistic Groups

Mobile Fingerprint Technology

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans the Department has to enable the police to fit mobile fingerprint technology to their vehicles. [4411]

Work on introducing mobile fingerprint technology and fitting them to police vehicles is being taken forward by the Police Information Technology Organisation (PITO) in conjunction with the police service. At present an operational demonstrator has been fitted to a number of vehicles in a pilot force.

Muggings

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people in each year since the introduction of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 in each age cohort under the age of 18 have been issued with reprimands or final warnings for muggings; and how many of those have later been convicted of another offence. [3796]

It is not possible to distinguish 'muggings' from other forms of robbery. Available information from the Home Office Court Proceedings database on the number of persons in each age cohort under the age of 18 who have been issued with a reprimand or final warning since the introduction of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, for robbery are contained in the table. It is not possible to identify those offenders who have then later been convicted of another offence. Statistics for 2004 will be available in the autumn.

Number of juveniles issued with a reprimand or final warning for robbery, by age cohort, England and Wales 1999–2003(8)

Age cohorts

Offence: Robbery

Statute: Theft Act 1968 Sec 8

10–11 years

12–14 years

15–17 years

1999

53

233

191

2000

66

266

187

2001

39

228

195

2002

36

182

121

2003

44

188

128

(8)These data are on the principal offence basis

Recreational Drugs

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what research he has (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated concerning the effects of using Viagra as a recreational drug along with amyl nitrates. [5852]

I have been asked to reply.

Before a medicine can be marketed in the United Kingdom, the manufacturer is required to conduct extensive clinical trials, the results of which are carefully evaluated by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency on behalf of the Licensing Authority. The Licensing Authority decides whether a marketing authorisation (product licence) can be granted and is advised on this matter by an independent advisory body, the Committee on Safety of Medicines. As independent experts, they undertake a thorough examination of the extensive scientific and technical information supplied in support of the application.

The manufacturer, in conjunction with the Licensing Authority, has provided guidance on prescribing and use of Viagra in the summary of product characteristics for healthcare professionals and patient information leaflet (PIL) for patients. These documents provide full up-to-date information on correct use of Viagra, including contraindicating (prohibiting) the use of Viagra in combination with nitrates. The PIL states:

"Do not take Viagra if you are taking medicines containing nitrates, or nitric oxide donors such as amyl nitrite ("poppers"). Viagra can cause a serious increase in the effects of these medicines. Tell your doctor if you are taking any of these medicines."

Cabinet Office

DirectGov

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster if he will make a statement on the launch of the DirectGov internet portal for Government services. [7897]

I refer the hon. Member to the response I gave the hon. Member for Loughborough (Mr. Reed) on 28 June 2005, Official Report, column 1387W.

Laptop Computers

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many laptop computers have been used by (a) Ministers, (b) special advisers and (c) officials in his Department in each year since 1995; how many have been (i) lost and (ii) stolen in that period; what the cost was of the use of laptops in that period; and if he will make a statement. [4125]

The number of laptops used, lost and stolen in the Department in the period 2000 to 2004 are shown in the table.

Number used

Number lost

Number stolen

2000

222

0

0

2001

540

0

1

2002

629

0

0

2003

731

6

3

2004

813

2

4

In addition the Cabinet Office Ministerial Support Group currently has a pool of 12 laptops for the use of Ministers, special advisers and officials within the group.

Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

Antarctic Consultative Meeting (Swedish Proposal)

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what policy positions the Government advocated at the 28th Antarctic Consultative Meeting, with particular reference to the Swedish proposal regarding the remedying of pollution. [5879]

holding answer 20 June 2005

A new annex on Liability Arising from Environmental Emergencies to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty was adopted at the 28th Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, held this year in Stockholm from 6 to 17 June 2005.

This new annex has been the subject of negotiations among Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties for the past 12 years. The UK has been actively and constructively engaged in all negotiations and is fully committed to the implementation of the new annex.

UK-led initiatives on other issues that were agreed in Stockholm included Site Guidelines for Visitors to Antarctica and a Management Plan for Deception Island.

Bosnia and Herzegovina

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the prevalence of provocative nationalism by local authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina. [6738]

Nationalist sentiments among all three constituent peoples in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) continue to obstruct the reform process, notably on public broadcasting, police restructuring and defence reform, all of which are requirements for BiH's further progress towards the European Union and NATO. We have made representations to the Bosnian authorities about the need to tackle this problem.

As we approach the 10th anniversary of the Srebrenica massacre, it is important that the constituent peoples of BiH and all the countries of the region turn away once and for all from nationalism and work to promote lasting reconciliation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what his assessment is of the rate of return of displaced groups to their homes in Bosnia and Herzegovina. [6739]

According to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees' (UNHCR) figures, the rate of return of displaced persons to their pre-war homes has dropped in the last five years, as most of those willing to return have now done so. The overall number of returns has. however, continued to increase slowly. By September last year, a million refugees and displaced people had returned to their homes, from an estimated 2.2 million displaced by the conflict of the 1990s.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of the segregation of minority returnees in Bosnia and Herzegovina. [6740]

Of the approximately one million refugees and displaced people who had returned to their pre-war homes by January 2005, over 450,000 had returned to areas where they were not the ethnic majority. But there is more work to be done. Some minority returnees still face discrimination in access to jobs in public services and private employment and to education, health and social security. The failure to bring to justice all war crimes indictees has also reduced confidence in the return process. Economic development remains a priority to ensure the sustainable return of minority returnees.

Burma

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions he has held with the Burmese authorities on encouraging increased democracy in Burma; and if he will make a statement. [7907]

I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to the hon. Member for Buckingham (John Bercow) on 25 May 2005, Official Report, column 132W.

Burundi

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assistance the Government provides to the Regional Peace Initiative for Burundi; and if he will make a statement. [7362]

The Regional Peace Initiative for Burundi (RPI) is chaired by Ugandan President Museveni and comprises representatives of the Governments of Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Somalia, South Africa and Tanzania. The Government of Burundi, the African Union and the UN are party to its discussions. It meets on an ad hoc basis.

The UK and EU partners provide political support to the RPI, and provide development support to Burundi in order to help it carry out the recommendations of the RPI. Total UK development assistance to Burundi in financial year 2005–06 will be around £10 million.

EU Committees

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many times during the (a) Italian, (b) Irish and (c) Dutch Presidency of the EU the (i) Joint Committee (EEC-India), (ii) Joint Committee (EC-Laos) and (iii) Joint Committee (EEC-Macao) met; when and where these meetings took place; what UK Government expert was present; and if he will make a statement. [573]

The EEC-India Joint Committee met once under the Dutch Presidency on 10 September 2004 in Brussels. It did not meet under the Italian or Irish Presidencies.

The EEC-Laos Joint Committee met once under the Irish Presidency on 7 Jan 2004 in Vientiane. It did not meet under the Italian and Dutch Presidencies. The EEC-Macao Joint Committee met once under the Irish Presidency on 3 March 2004 in Macao. It did not meet during the Italian or Dutch Presidencies. These are Commission led groups, which the Presidency of the day attends as observers only, representing other member states. As such there were no British officials present at these meetings.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many times during the (a) Italian, (b) Irish and (c) Dutch presidency of the EU the (i) EEC-Mercosur Joint Advisory Committee, (ii) Joint Committee (EEC-Argentina) and (iii) Joint Committee (EEC-Brazil) met; when and where these meetings took place; what UK Government expert was present; and if he will make a statement. [627]

The EEC-Mercosur Joint Advisory Committee did not meet under the Italian, Irish or Dutch presidencies. The EEC Argentina Joint Committee met once during the Dutch presidency on 13 December 2004 in Buenos Aires. The UK was represented by staff of the British embassy in Buenos Aires. It did not meet under the Italian or Irish presidencies. The EEC-Brazil Joint Committee did not meet during the Italian, Irish or Dutch presidencies.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many times during the (a) Italian, (b) Irish and (c) Dutch presidency of the EU the (i) Joint Committee (EEC-Vietnam), (ii) Joint Committee (EEC-Central America) and (iii) Joint Committee (EEC-Mexico) met; when and where these meetings took place; what UK Government expert was present; and if he will make a statement. [632]

The EEC-Vietnam Joint Committee met once during the Italian presidency on 21 November 2003 in Brussels. This is a Commission led group, which the presidency of the day attends as observer only, representing other member states. As such there were no British officials present at these meetings. It did not meet under the Irish or Dutch presidencies of the EU. The EEC-Central America Joint Committee met once during the Italian presidency on 3 October 2003 in Brussels. The UK was represented by staff from the UK representation in Brussels. It did not meet under the Irish or Dutch presidencies. The EEC-Mexico Joint Committee met twice, once under the Italian presidency on 11 November 2003 in Brussels and once during the Dutch presidency on 10 November 2004 in Mexico. The UK was represented at the 2003 meeting by staff from the UK representation in Brussels and at the 2004 meeting by staff from the British embassy in Mexico City. It did not meet during the Irish presidency.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many times during the (a) Italian, (b) Irish and (c) Dutch presidency of the EU the (i) Joint Committee (EEC-Nepal), (ii) Joint Committee (EEC-Pakistan) and (iii) Joint Committee (EEC-Sri Lanka) met; when and where these meetings took place; what UK Government expert was present; and if he will make a statement. [635]

The EEC-Nepal Joint Committee met once under the Dutch presidency in September 2004 in Kathmandu. It did not meet under the Italian or Irish presidencies. The EEC-Pakistan Joint Committee did not meet under the Italian. Irish or Dutch presidencies. The EEC-Sri Lanka Joint Committee met once under the Dutch presidency on 29 October 2004 in Brussels. No meetings took place during the Italian or Irish presidencies. These are Commission led groups, which the presidency of the day attends as observers only, representing other member states. As such there were no British officials present at these meetings.

EU Constitution

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

(1) whether it is his policy that the creation of an EU External Action Service, as proposed in Article III-296(3) of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, could be agreed without ratification of the Treaty; [4220]

(2) pursuant to his statement of 6 June 2005, Official Report, column 1000, on the EU Constitutional Treaty, whether it is his policy that the changes to the system of qualified majority voting proposed in the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, could be agreed without ratification of the Treaty; [4221]

(3) whether it is his policy that the creation of a President of the EU, as proposed in the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, could be agreed without ratification of the Treaty. [4894]

The creation of a President of the EU as proposed in the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, the changes in respect of the voting system and the provision of an EU External Action Service could not be agreed without ratification of the Treaty or of an amendment of the existing EU Treaties by all the member states in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

EU Linguistic Regime

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether the Government will implement the EU linguistic regime, agreed at the General Affairs Council of 13 June, with respect to any of the UK's languages in addition to English. [6979]

holding answer 27 June 2005

The General Affairs and External Relations Council of 13 June adopted conclusions, on a proposal from Spain, for a degree of official recognition in the EU of all languages that have official status in member states, either through their constitutions or national law. This means that member states may enter into administrative arrangements with the EU institutions over which languages may be used in relations with them, with the member state meeting all the direct or indirect costs incurred. Member states have agreed that any such arrangement should not have any effect on the otherwise efficient functioning of the institutions or on the legal status of the existing official languages of the Union. At the moment, Spain is the only country to have requested such arrangements for its regional languages. The Government have no current plans to make similar provisions for UK languages.

European Parliament

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs pursuant to the oral answer, of 21 June 2005, Official Report, column 653, on European Union (Finances), whether it is his Department's policy that the European Parliament should continue to meet in Strasbourg; and if he will make a statement. [6977]

holding answer 27 June 2005

Strasbourg was chosen as a site for the European Parliament (EP) in 1958, well before the UK joined the EU. It was chosen as a symbol of Franco-German reconciliation. While the Government believe that the splitting of the EP's sites is far from ideal, any change to the status quo would need the unanimous agreement of all 25 member states. That looks unlikely for the foreseeable future.

Human Rights

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether the informal meeting of EU Foreign Ministers in South Wales on 1–2 September will include discussion of pan-European attitudes to human rights. [6847]

IT Contracts

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what the (a) projected cost at the time of tender and (b) actual cost at the time of completion was for each IT contract commissioned by his Department in the last five years. [2577]

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) has a devolved procurement structure covering the UK and its overseas posts (over 200). As such there is no central database of all the Information Communication Technology (1CT) contracts in the FCO. We have recently installed a new Electronic Resource Management (ERM) system in London and are in the process of installing this system in all our posts overseas. Until this is complete, and our new reporting systems are in place, we are unable to produce the information requested without exceeding the disproportionate cost threshold. We are. however, able to provide information on our major ICT contracts (in excess of £1 million) as required by the question. A full list of contracts, including costs, will be made available in spreadsheet format to the Library of the House.

Moldova

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what plans he has to visit Moldova. [6478]

Foreign engagements for my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary and other Ministers are kept under constant review. It is not our practice to announce such visits until they are firm. Because of the unpredictable nature of world events, final decisions on overseas visits are often not possible until very shortly before the day of travel.

Russia

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent meetings he has had with Russian authorities to discuss British investment in Russia; and if he will make a statement. [6704]

My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary has not recently met with Russian authorities to discuss British investment in Russia.

However Russia offers many investment opportunities. Some notable UK investments include BP's $6.75 billion joint ventures with the Russian oil company TNK, Pilkington's €165 million investment to build a glass production plant in Moscow and Shell's operation in the $10 billion Sakhalin II project. Total foreign direct investment into Russia was $40.9 billion, a 36.4 per cent. increase on 2003, of which $7 billion is attributed to the UK.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent representations his Department has received about media independence in Russia; and if he will make a statement. [6705]

Since June 2004, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) has received one letter about the murders of journalists in Russia and three parliamentary questions about media freedom in the Russian Federation. The FCO's contacts with the NGO community reinforce the conclusion that media freedom is an important issue in the democratic development of Russia.

We are actively engaged in a bilateral human rights dialogue with the Russian Government. The latest round of talks was held in Moscow on 23 May 2005 and included discussion of media freedom in Russia.

We are also engaged, with our European partners, in biannual EU-Russia human rights consultations. The first session of consultations took place in Luxembourg on 1 March 2005. Media freedom in Russia was discussed. The next round of consultations is scheduled to take place under the UK Presidency of the EU on 8 September 2005.

In addition to this, staff at our Embassy in Moscow continue to raise our concerns with their interlocutors in the Russian Government, including with official institutions in Russia that exist to protect and promote human rights.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions his Department has had with the Russian Government about Russia's accession to the World Trade Organisation; and if he will make a statement. [6706]

We have not had any recent discussions with Russia concerning World Trade Organisation accession, on which negotiations between the EU and Russia were concluded in May 2004.

Sudan

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions his Department has had with the Government of Sudan concerning reports of fighting along its border with Eritrea; and if he will make a statement. [7376]

holding answer 28 June 2005

We are concerned by recent reports of fighting around the town of Tokar in Eastern Sudan between the Government of Sudan and the Eastern Front, supported by the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM). Our ambassador in Khartoum raised this issue with the Government of Sudan and the Eastern Front on 23 June.

The UK special representative for Darfur raised this matter with the JEM in Abuja on 21 June. We have re-iterated to the Eastern Front that co-operation with the JEM in military operations unnecessarily complicates the issues in the East and undermines their claims of commitment to a peaceful resolution.

We have made clear to all parties that any attacks are totally unacceptable, and there is no military solution to the problems in the East, nor to those elsewhere in Sudan. The Comprehensive Peace Agreement provides the framework for a political solution throughout the country, including Darfur and the East. The Government of Sudan have stated its readiness to engage in consultations with the Eastern Front. We are pressing the Eastern Front to do the same.

Uzbekistan

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what efforts he is making to lobby for an end to the 'sizdan ugina, bizdan bugina' culture of public officials in Uzbekistan; and if he will make a statement. [6749]

Good governance, both economic and political, is a key aspect of our dialogue with Uzbekistan. We have consistently and repeatedly brought to the attention of senior Government figures the importance of transparency in governance and the negative effects of corruption. In a speech to the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC on 18 May 2005, my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary called upon the Uzbek Government to develop a much more open and pluralistic society in order to address the root causes of the recent disturbances in Andizhan. This message has also been taken forward in Uzbekistan. On 15 May, our ambassador to Tashkent raised with Deputy Foreign Minister Nematov the importance of political and economic reform in the light of events in Andizhan.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations he has made to the Kyrgyz authorities to protest against the apparent forced return of Uzbek refugees in early June to their home country; and if he will make a statement. [6768]

I refer my hon. Friend to the reply I gave on 20 June 2005, Official Report, column 733W to my hon. Friend the Member for Clwyd, South (Mr. Jones).

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what visits the UK ambassador in Tashkent has made to (a) Andijan and (b) the Fergana Valley since 17 May. [6769]

David Moran, our ambassador to Tashkent, has made two visits to Andizhan (Andijan) since 17 May 2005.

The first was on 18 May. when he accompanied a group of diplomats, members of international organisations and the media. Mr. Moran's lobbying had been instrumental in prompting the Uzbek authorities to organise this visit. The event was tightly controlled, and Mr. Moran was unable to engage members of the public. Having pressed Uzbek Deputy Foreign Minister Nematov on these restrictions. Mr. Moran secured agreement that he and EU colleagues could return unaccompanied.

On 26 and 27 May, Mr. Moran returned to Andizhan. He visited the central Yangi bazaar, and the city's central square. There was a high security service presence, and members of the public appeared afraid to approach Mr. Moran. He had a similar experience at the Kyrgyz border near Pakhtaabad. and at the border town of Karasu. This represented a distinct change from public behaviour in early May. when people had gathered around the visiting Defence Attache"'s car. and asked him to pass news of events in Andizhan outside Uzbekistan.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

(1) what his policy is on the OSCE's efforts to promote a public inquiry into the events of 13 May in Andijan in Uzbekistan; [6770]

(2) how many people he estimates have died in the apparent uprising in Andijan in Uzbekistan on 13 May; [6771]

(3) what efforts he has made to investigate the events of 13 May in Andijan in Uzbekistan; and if he will make a statement. [6772]

We were extremely disturbed by reports of Uzbek troops firing on demonstrators in Andizhan (Andijan). When my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary first heard these reports, he urged the Uzbek Government to allow an independent, international investigation. We are pleased that the US, the UN, the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), and NATO have all done the same. The UK was at the forefront in condemning the indiscriminate and disproportionate use offeree by the Uzbek Government.

Islam Karimov, Uzbek President, responded to our repeated calls for an inquiry by creating a Parliamentary Committee to investigate the unrest. We, and our European Union (EU) partners, have made clear that we consider this an insufficient response. On 13 June, the General Affairs External Relations Council (GAERC) called on the Uzbek Government to reconsider its position, giving a deadline of 30 June. Failure to do so will lead to punitive EU measures, including partial suspension of the Partnership and Co-operation Agreement (PCA).

It is not possible to say how many people died during the unrest in Andizhan, but the recent OCSE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights' (ODIHR) report, which was published on 20 June, estimated that between 300 and 500 were killed.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of whether the situation in Andijan, Uzbekistan has been stabilised; and if he will make a statement. [6829]

Staff from the British Embassy in Tashkent have made five visits to Andizhan (Andijan) and the surrounding region since the unrest began. David Moran, our Ambasssador to Tashkent, visited first on 18 May when he accompanied a group of diplomats, members of international organisations and the media. Mr. Moran's lobbying had been instrumental in prompting the Uzbek authorities to organise this visit. The event was tightly controlled, and Mr. Moran was unable to engage members of the public. Having pressed Uzbek Deputy Foreign Minister Nematov on these restrictions, Mr. Moran secured agreement that he and EU colleagues could return unaccompanied.

He visited Andizhan again on 26 May, when he saw the central Yangi bazaar, and city's central square. On the same visit, he also went to the border town of Karasu, where he observed brisk market trading. Since the visits made by Embassy staff earlier in May, however, he noticed a significant increase in security service presence, and commented that members of the public appeared afraid to approach him.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions (a) he and (b) his officials have had with those conducting the investigations into the Andijan uprising. [7272]

In late May 2005. Uzbek President Karimov responded to repeated calls for an independent, international inquiry by creating a Parliamentary Committee to investigate the events of 12–13 May in Andizhan (Andijan), inviting diplomats from the US, France, Russia, China and Uzbekistan's regional neighbours to observe its work. On 13 June, at the General Affairs External Relations Council (GAERC), we and our EU partners rejected Karimov's proposal, and reaffirmed our call for an independent international investigation, giving a deadline of 30 June. In view of this, we have made no attempt to contact the Uzbek Parliamentary Committee.

We are, however, continuing to monitor closely the situation in Andizhan. Members of staff from the British Embassy, Tashkent, have visited the area five times since 13 May. We are also aware of the reports published by the US-based NGO Human Rights Watch, and the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe's (OSCE) Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), which suggest that the Uzbek authorities used indiscriminate and disproportionate force in Andizhan. These reports, which include interviews with eye witnesses now on the Kyrgyz side of the border, further underline the need for a comprehensive, international and independent inquiry in Uzbekistan.

Northern Ireland

Crime (Commercial Premises)

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what has been the recorded level of crime involving commercial premises in each Belfast police district in each of the past five years with reference to (a) burglary, (b) robbery, (c) armed robbery, (d) theft and (e) shoplifting. [7160]

The statistics requested are as in the following tables. Figures relating to thefts from commercial premises have not been provided as it is not possible to differentiate between personal and business victims.

Crimes recorded by the police

Offence type

2000–01

2001–02

2002–03

2003–04

2004–05

East Belfast District command Unit

Non-domestic burglary

410

403

518

358

283

Robbery—business

20

25

23

8

8

Armed robbery—business

58

106

106

78

35

Shoplifting

413

290

265

226

223

North Belfast District Command Unit

Non-domestic burglary

320

454

426

389

294

Robbery—business

34

36

39

27

11

Armed robbery—business

73

137

189

98

110

Shoplifting

288

271

229

169

159

South Belfast District Command Unit

Non-domestic burglary

644

736

877

659

899

Robbery—business

42

69

70

43

26

Armed robbery—business

103

185

161

109

105

Shoplifting

1,570

1,442

1,251

1,096

1,211

West Belfast District Command Unit

Non-domestic burglary

195

246

197

132

132

Robbery—business

18

23

22

13

5

Armed robbery—business

72

64

77

53

34

Shoplifting

149

131

103

71

49

Source:

Central Statistics Unit, PSNI

Crime Reporting

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what research has been carried out by his Department into the change in the level of non-reporting of crime in Northern Ireland in the last five years; and if he will make a statement. [7159]

Change in the level of reporting of crime in Northern Ireland is most frequently measured by the Northern Ireland Crime Survey (NICS), the most recent published results for which relate to the 1998, 2001 and 2003–04 sweeps. In addition, the 2000 International Crime Victim Survey (ICVS) compared crime reporting rates across 17 industrialised countries or regions, including Northern Ireland.

Although, typically, less than half of crime is reported to the police, Northern Ireland tends to have a higher reporting rate than England and Wales and it had the highest rate of all countries participating in the 2000 ICVS. Reporting rates can fluctuate for a number of reasons, including, changes in the level or mix of crime occurring or in the level of confidence in the police and the wider criminal justice system.

Information from the NICS and ICVS on the levels of crime reported to the police is contained within the Northern Ireland Office Research and Statistical Bulletins 1/2001 International Crime Victimisation Survey 2000: Key Findings for Northern Ireland" and 4/2005 Crime Victimisation in Northern Ireland: Findings from the 2003/04 Northern Ireland Crime Survey", copies of which are available from the House of Commons library. The bulletins can also be downloaded from the internet (http://www.nio.gov.uk/index/statistics-research/publications.htm).

Elections

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what the cost was of distributing 2005 election communications via the Royal Mail in Northern Ireland. [2256]

This is an operational matter and is the responsibility of the Chief Electoral Officer who is writing to the hon. Lady. The text of the letter reads:

The cost of providing the Royal Mail service to distribute election material on behalf of candidates at both the Parliamentary General Election and the 28 district council elections was £507,479.51.

A copy of the letter will be placed in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what the total costs were of the 2005 (a) local council and (b) Westminster elections in Northern Ireland. [2257]

Final figures are not yet available for the cost of each election. The estimated cost of the district council elections is £1.75 million and the estimated cost of the parliamentary general election in Northern Ireland is £2.5 million.

Fuel Poverty

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many people (a) below the age of 18 and (b) over the age of 60 years have been living in fuel-poor households in Northern Ireland in each year since 1997. [7632]

Figures on fuel poverty, which are classified in terms of households rather than by age groups, are collected through the Northern Ireland Housing Executive's House Condition Survey and not on an annual basis. The last survey, completed in 2001, indicated that(a) 54,920 households, where there were children, and (b) 102,039 households, where the head of household was over the age of 60, were living in fuel poverty.

Invest Northern Ireland

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how much has been spent by Invest Northern Ireland on new road layouts in each of the sites that they own in (a) North Belfast, (b) South Belfast, (c) East Belfast and (d) West Belfast in each year since 2003. [7852]

In 2003, Invest NI spent £190,000 on infrastructure including roads at the Springfield Road. In 2004 it spent £3.26 million on infrastructure works including roads at Spring Vale, Springfield Road and Forthriver Business Park. To date in 2005 it has spent £810,000 at Forthriver Business Park. All of these sites are in West Belfast. Invest NI did not incur any expenditure on road works in any other of its properties in Belfast.

Religious Hatred Prosecutions

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many successful prosecutions there have been in Northern Ireland under the prevention of incitement to religious hatred legislation since its introduction in 1987. [7579]

Data prior to 1993 are not available; data beyond 2003 will be available later in 2005.

During the period 1993 to 2003, there were no prosecutions for incitement to religious hatred. There was one prosecution and subsequent conviction for distributing written material to incite hatred.

Sentencing

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what recent research has been conducted by his Department to compare the severity of sentencing in Northern Ireland courts with those in England and Wales for similar offences; and if he will make a statement. [7156]

Given the different sentencing practices across jurisdictions and the number of variable factors in individual cases, formal comparisons of the severity of sentencing in Northern Ireland courts and those in England and Wales have not been undertaken. The recently completed consultation on the Sentencing Framework in Northern Ireland will however provide an opportunity to consider issues relating to the disposals available to the courts in Northern Ireland and the types of sentences handed down.

Tennis

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will initiate an independent review of whether tennis as a sport in Northern Ireland is best promoted and developed under its current affiliation to Tennis Ireland. [7049]

I have no plans to initiate an independent review of whether tennis as a sport in Northern Ireland is best promoted and developed under its current affiliation to Tennis Ireland as this is not a matter for me, but a matter for the Ulster Branch of Tennis Ireland and its members. I am aware, however, that following recent meetings with the Sports Council for Northern Ireland, the Ulster Branch of Tennis Ireland has agreed to enter into exploratory discussions on possible options for any player that might prefer a different affiliation.

Voting (General Election)

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what estimate he has made of the number of those eligible to vote in each parliamentary constituency in Northern Ireland who were unable to vote at the general election on 5 May as a result of not having a correct form of identification. [323]

According to figures provided by the Chief Electoral Officer, 3,818 electors were originally turned away from polling stations without valid photographic identification. Of those electors, 1,555 subsequently returned before the close of poll with an alternative, correct form of ID and were able to cast their vote. The remaining 2,263 electors were unable to vote because of a failure to produce valid identification.

The totals recorded for those who were originally turned away, per constituency, were as follows:

Constituency

Number originally turned

away for invalid ID

Belfast, East

162

Belfast, North

193

Belfast, South

187

Belfast, West

164

East Antrim

167

East Londonderry

174

Fermanagh and South Tyrone

368

Foyle

199

Lagan Valley

163

Mid-Ulster

239

Newry and Armagh

352

North Antrim

301

North Down

124

South Antrim

175

South Down

187

Strangford

166

Upper Bann

263

West Tyrone

234

Total

3,818

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what estimate he has made of the number of disabled voters in each parliamentary constituency in Northern Ireland who were unable to vote at the general election as a result of access restrictions at polling stations. [344]

This is an operational matter and is the responsibility of the Chief Electoral Officer who is writing to the hon. Member. The text of the letter reads:

The Electoral Office has no indication that significant numbers of disabled electors were unable to vote on 5 May because of access restrictions at polling stations. While we do seek to ensure that every polling place is readily accessible by all electors and have, for some time, been working with the Equality Commission and owners of property to encourage compliance with the Disability Discrimination Act, adjustments take time. In the interim, we do keep the polling station scheme under constant review and encourage anyone with local knowledge who may be aware of more suitable premises to put forward their ideas. In addition, as you know a public consultation exercise on the scheme was carried out earlier this year and all comments received were taken into account before finalising arrangements for this year's elections".

A copy of the letter will be placed in the Library.

Deputy Prime Minister

Affordable Housing

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what advice he has received from the Regional Housing Board on the amount of affordable housing needed in Devon (a) at the latest date for which figures are available and (b) over the next 10 years. [7678]

holding answer 27 June 2005

The provision of affordable housing is a local authority responsibility and should be made on the basis of robust local assessments of needs. Policy ST18 in the adopted Structure Plan for Devon 2001–16 highlights the strategic importance of the need to provide for affordable housing and establishes a consistent basis for the development of local plan policies throughout Devon.

The South West Housing Body has however made the provision of additional affordable housing in Devon and across the region its number one priority, and its forthcoming advice to my right hon. Friend the Deputy Prime Minister on the allocation of capital funding for affordable housing for 2006–07 and 2007–08 will reflect this situation. Further work will be undertaken by the Regional Housing Body to improve the evidence base for affordable housing need and provision on a consistent basis through the promotion of sub-regional housing assessments.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister

(1) how much social housing grant has been allocated in Devon in each of the last five years; and what proportion was in support of section 106 schemes in each year; [7679]

(2) how much the Housing Corporation has allocated for the provision of affordable housing for each district in Devon in each of the last five years. [7680]

holding answer 27 June 2005

Expenditure on affordable housing in Devon provided through the Housing Corporation broken down by local authority, in the last five years, is detailed in the following tables. The programmes included in the table are the Approved Development Programme (ADP), the Local Authority Social Housing Grant (LASHG) and Transitional LASHG, the Safer Communities Supported Housing Fund (SCSHF), and the Starter Home Initiative (SHI).

The amount supporting section 106 is only available for 2004–05. The total proportion for Devon is 14 per cent.

Breakdown by local authority in Devon for the last five years 2000–01 -- £ million

ADP

LASHG

SCSHF

SHI

Total

East Devon

0.486

0.431

0.000

0.000

0.917

Exeter

2.279

1.017

0.000

0.000

3.296

Mid Devon

0.735

0.546

0.000

0.000

1.280

North Devon

1.052

1.130

0.000

0.000

2.181

Plymouth

3.103

0.235

0.000

0.000

3.339

South Hams

0.446

1.830

0.000

0.000

2.275

Teignbridge

1.618

0.386

0.000

0.000

2.004

Torbay

1.176

0.487

0.000

0.000

1.664

Torridge

0.447

0.003

0.000

0.000

0.450

West Devon

0.513

0.544

0.000

0.000

1.057

Devon Total

11.854

6.609

0.000

0.000

18.462

2001–02 -- £ million

ADP

LASHG

SCSHF

SHI

Total

East Devon

0.990

0.587

0.053

0.000

1.630

Exeter

1.438

1.628

0.145

0.000

3.212

Mid Devon

0.592

0.218

0.000

0.000

0.810

North Devon

0.276

0.129

0.127

0.000

0.532

Plymouth

3.754

0.587

0.000

0.000

4.341

South Hams

0.402

1.251

0.000

0.000

1.653

Teignbridge

1.429

0.318

0.000

0.000

1.747

Torbay

1.640

0.308

0.032

0.000

1.980

Torridge

0.424

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.424

West Devon

0.402

0.648

0.000

0.000

1.050

Devon Total

11.347

5.673

0.357

0.000

17.378

2002–03 -- £ million

ADP

LASHG

SCSHF

SHI

Total

East Devon

1.075

1.801

0.026

0.000

2.902

Exeter

1.891

1.376

0.873

0.032

4.171

Mid Devon

1.018

0.185

0.000

0.000

1.203

North Devon

1.326

3.115

0.057

0.000

4.498

Plymouth

4.330

0.324

0.000

0.000

4.654

South Hams

0.849

1.644

0.000

0.000

2.493

Teignbridge

0.832

0.342

0.000

0.000

1.174

Torbay

1.593

0.543

0.613

0.011

2.760

Torridge

0.610

0.112

0.022

0.000

0.745

West Devon

0.958

0.795

0.000

0.000

1.753

Devon Total

14.481

10.237

1.591

0.042

26.351

2003–04 -- £ million

ADP

LASHG

SCSHF

SHI

Total

East Devon

0.715

2.012

0.143

0.000

2.871

Exeter

3.218

3.198

0.650

0.175

7.241

Mid Devon

0.852

0.000

0.062

0.000

0.914

North Devon

1.501

0.963

0.072

0.000

2.536

Plymouth

8.807

0.000

0.033

0.000

8.840

South Hams

1.466

3.252

0.344

0.000

5.062

Teignbridge

2.280

0.000

0.000

0.000

2.280

Torbay

3.950

0.000

0.565

0.062

4.576

Torridge

0.970

0.000

0.039

0.000

1.009

West Devon

1.673

1.473

0.000

0.000

3.146

Devon Total

25.433

10.898

1.908

0.237

38.476

2004–05 -- £ million

ADP

LASHG

SCSHF

SHI

Total

East Devon

0.518

0.256

0.008

0.000

0.781

Exeter

3.147

0.287

0.173

0.021

3.627

Mid Devon

1.778

0.000

0.054

0.000

1.832

North Devon

1.834

0.618

0.136

0.000

2.588

Plymouth

6.203

0.000

0.295

0.000

6.498

South Hams

1.095

0.254

0.000

0.000

1.349

Teignbridge

1.477

0.000

0.000

0.000

1.477

Torbay

1.730

0.000

0.153

0.000

1.882

Torridge

0.388

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.388

West Devon

0.646

0.175

0.000

0.000

0.821

Devon Total

18.815

1.590

0.818

0.021

21.244

Note:

All data analysed by sponsoring local authority.

Source:

Housing Corporation.

Broadband (East Sussex)

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what progress has been made towards targets for broadband access in East Sussex. [7965]

I have been asked to reply.

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him today to his question number 7855.

Building Regulations

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what measures he plans to introduce to ensure full compliance with Part L of the Building Regulations; and whether they will include random pressure testing of new homes. [5664]

holding answer 20 June 2005

The Government are pursuing the commitments made in theEnergy White Paper to raise the energy performance standards in the Building Regulations and to work withbuilding control bodies to see how enforcement can be improved. After extensive consultations with stakeholders, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister have developed proposals for improving technical standards, including sample pressure testing of new homes, and for simplifying the compliance processes. There will also be a programme of dissemination, training and supporting help desks to give every opportunity to become acquainted with the new provisions and so improve compliance.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what robust standard details he requires under Part L of the Building Regulations for thermal bridging in new homes; and what changes he plans to make to those standards. [5665]

holding answer 20 June 2005

Builders are not required to use particular details but the guidance in Approved Document L offers the use of robust details as a way of showing compliance. These were developed by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister with expert assistance and published by The Stationery Office. A new edition is planned to accompany the next amendment to Part L later this year. The new edition will include additional robust details, and the aim is to revise all the details to include more information and to facilitate their electronic transfer into builders' drawings. The accompanying design and construction guidance will also be improved and checklists added to assist compliance.

Council Housing

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the average time taken to re-let a local authority dwelling was in each English region in each year since 1997. [2437]

The following table provides estimates for 2002–03 and 2003–04. Data in the form asked for are not available for other years.

Average days to re-let a local authority dwelling

Region

2002–03

2003–04

East Midlands

50

45

East

39

35

London

41

37

North East

56

50

North West

57

55

South East

38

39

South West

43

44

West Midlands

53

44

Yorkshire and the Humber

59

49

England

51

45

Note:

Approximate estimates because data is not available for all local authorities.

Sources:

HRA Subsidy Base Data returns for 2004–05 and 2005–06; Business Plan Statistical Appendices 2004.

Disabled Facilities Grant

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what representations he has received on progress with the review of the disabled facilities grant. [7958]

Representations have been received from 32 hon. Members in the last month. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has also received a number of representations from local authorities and organisations representing disabled people. In relation to progress with the review, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given on 15 June 2005, Official Report, columns 402–03W.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will recommend the abolition of the means testing of parents of disabled children as part of the disabled facilities grant process, as is currently the case in Northern Ireland and is soon to be the case in Wales. [7124]

The disabled facilities grant programme is subject to an interdepartmental review and a team from Bristol university are currently looking at the operation of the programme including the means test. The review is continuing and Ministers will put forward any proposals for change later in the year.

Fines (London)

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how much was collected in (a) parking fines and (b) fines for fly-tipping in each London borough in each year since 1997. [2501]

The information is as follows:

(a) The information requested in relation to parking fines for the periods from 1996–97 to 1999–2000 has been made available in the Library of the House. The figures for the periods from 2000–01 are a matter for the Mayor of London.

(b) The information requested is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. All fines in this period have been issued by the courts and collected by the courts.

Fire Service

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether his Department plans to conduct an impact assessment of the recent changes in fire cover in the Greater London area; and if he will make a statement. [7697]

No. Fire and Rescue Authorities are required by the Fire and Rescue Service National Framework to have in place and maintain an Integrated Risk Management Plan. It is, therefore, for the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority to determine appropriate fire cover in its area.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will list the fire stations that have had a fire engine removed in each of the last 10 years; to which fire station a fire engine was re-located in each case; and whether a fire engine was replaced at each such station within (i) two years, (ii) three years, (iii) four years, (iv) five years and (v) more than six years. [7699]

The information requested is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what proportion of fires were caused by accumulations of litter in the last year for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement. [7211]

Information is collected centrally on fires involving all loose refuse and fires in refuse containers.

The latest figures for the year ending 30 September 2004 show that 143,800 fires, which is 37.5 per cent. of fires attended by the fire and rescue service in England, were refuse fires.

This is 7 per cent. fewer than in the previous year (which included 15 strike days). The majority of these fires (93 per cent.) are classified as secondary fires—not involving property or casualties.

Flood Risk Assessments

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what (a) conditions and (b) costs will be placed on developers for access to strategic flood risk assessments prepared by (i) the Environment Agency and (ii) local planning authorities. [6893]

Strategic flood risk assessment information will be made available to developers preparing site-specific flood risk assessments. The precise administrative arrangements for access to strategic flood risk assessments are for the authorities undertaking them to determine. The Environment Agency is keen to facilitate the provision of information on flood risk at reasonable cost.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will list areas for which flood risk assessment data is assessed as being necessary; and which of these data are available to developers. [6894]

Paragraph 62 of planning policy guidance note (PPG)25 sets out the criteria for determining whether a flood risk assessment should accompany an application for planning permission. Some of these relate to the circumstances of the site and some to the flood plain maps prepared by the Environment Agency and provided to local authorities, as specified in paragraph 24 of PPG25. The Environment Agency flood plain maps are available to developers.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what discussions his Department has had with (a) planning authorities and (b) the Environment Agency on the preparation of flood risk assessment data. [6895]

Planning policy guidance note (PPG)25 advises those proposing developments in flood risk areas to carry out a flood risk assessment, which should be appropriate to the location, scale and nature of the development and should be submitted with the application. Local planning authorities and the Environment Agency were consulted in 2000 and 2001 on the draft of PPG25 and in autumn 2004 on the question of whether to review it. The Environment Agency was closely involved in drafting PPG25. Within the framework of guidance provided by PPG25, it is for local authorities to discuss with developers and the Environment Agency the data that would be appropriate in an individual flood risk assessment.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what his estimate is of the additional cost to a developer of undertaking a flood risk assessment before building a house. [7081]

Flood risk assessments should be proportionate to the location, scale and nature of the development and the apparent type and degree of risk. The cost will be site-specific, reflecting these factors.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister when the Thames Gateway Flood Risk Assessment, covering Canvey Island, will be available. [7076]

The Thames Gateway South Essex Partnership intends to complete its Strategic Flood Risk Assessment work by the end of the 2005–06 financial year.

HIP Energy Reports

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what assessment has been made of the likely (a) switching in use of domestic fuel that will result from the proposed home information pack energy reports and (b) environmental effects of the consequential change in external costs. [6302]

The Government do not anticipate that there will be any significant switches in use of domestic fuel resulting directly from the proposed HIP energy reports. The energy reports will primarily provide information to a potential buyer on the energy efficiency of the home in question. The reports will also include recommendations for the cost-effective improvement of the energy performance of the building which if carried out, would have environmental benefits.

Homelessness

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will list guidance and advice sent by his Department to local authorities in the last year on homelessness. [7145]

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister have issued the following guidance and advice to local authorities:

Housing Quality Network Report: Local Authorities' Homeless Strategies Evaluation and Good Practice" Published: November 2004.

Effective Co-operation in Tackling Homelessness: Nomination Agreements and Evictions Guidance" Published : November 2004.

Homelessness and Health Information Sheet Number 3: Dental services.

Homelessness and Health Information Sheet Number 4: Hospital discharge".

There was statutory guidance, issued under section 182 of the Housing Act 1996, on section 11 of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc.) Act 2004 (which amends the local connection provisions of the homelessness legislation).

In addition we have published the following documents which are available on our website:

Policy Brief 8: Homeless Statistics Homeless Statistics March 2004 and Improving the Quality of Hostels and other Forms of Temporary Accommodation"

Policy Brief 9: Homelessness Strategies : Moving Forward"

Policy Brief 10: Homelessness Statistics September 2004 and Delivering on the Positive Outcomes"

Policy Brief 11: Providing More Settled Homes"

A Strategy for Tackling Homelessness: Sustainable Communities: Settled Homes; Changing Lives"

Houses in Multiple Occupation

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what assessment the Government have made of the regulatory impact of their plans for licensing of houses in multiple occupation. [7442]

The Government carried out a regulatory impact assessment on the effect of licensing of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) during the formation of the policy. The report of the assessments were published and made available via the Libraries of the House and placed on the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's website in December 2003.

The Government will also be publishing later this year further regulatory impact assessments to accompany each of the pieces of secondary legislation needed to implement the licensing of HMOs.

London Boroughs (Communication)

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how much was spent per 1,000 population on external communication by each London borough in each of the last five years. [7461]

The amount spent per 1,000 population on external communication by each London borough in each of the last five years is not available centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Phone Masts

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will list the planning permissions for mobile phone mast sites that have been refused by the local planning authority but were granted on appeal by (a) the Planning Inspectorate and (b) the Secretary of State since the last revision of PPG 8. [7411]

PPG 8 was last revised in August 2001.

The Planning Inspectorate does not hold information about mobile phone masts specifically, and it could be obtained only at a disproportionate cost.

Health

Actrapid Insulin

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) if she will make a statement on the supply of actrapid (basal) insulin; [5666]

(2) if she will discuss with her EU counterparts Novo Novalisk's intention to discontinue the supply of actrapid insulin in the United Kingdom; [5667]

(3) what her most recent estimate is of the prescribing costs of (a) animal based insulins, (b) actrapid (basal) insulins, (c) humalog (analogue) insulins and (d) other insulins; [5770]

(4) what her estimate is of the number of diabetics prescribed (a) animal based insulins, (b) actrapid based insulins, (c) analogue insulins and (d) other insulins in the last period for which figures are available; [5771]

(5) what steps she has taken to identify alternative (a) manufacturers and (b) suppliers of the insulin products that Novo Nordisk are proposing to withdraw from the United Kingdom. [5772]

Novo Nordisk has informed the Department that it is planning to discontinue Actrapid Penfill insulin in December 2005. The vial presentation of Actrapid insulin will remain available. We have not sought an alternative supplier for the items being discontinued as there remains a number of different insulins and delivery devices available from various manufacturers. It is up to the clinician, in consultation with the patient, to decide which is most suitable. We are in discussion with Novo Nordisk to ensure a smooth transfer for patients to alternative products. We have no plans to consult with other European governments on Novo Novalisk's intention to discontinue the supply of Actrapid insulin.

We do not know the number of people prescribed either animal or human insulin, however, available information covers the number of prescription items and net ingredient cost of insulin dispensed in the community in England. The figures shown in the table were extracted from the prescription cost analysis system for 2004, supplied by the Prescription Pricing Authority.

Insulin

Items (million)

Net ingredient cost (£ million)

Animal derived

0.1

3.4

Human analogue

4.1

193.4

Total

4.2

196.8

Ambulance Service

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to her answer of 20 June 2005, Official Report, column 794W, on the London Ambulance Service, what representations she has received concerning independent ambulances. [7251]

The Department has received correspondence on this issue from patients' forums, independent ambulance organisations and national health service trusts. We have also received feedback at stakeholder consultation events and informally from NHS colleagues.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to her answer of 20 June 2005, Official Report, column 794W, on the London Ambulance Service, when the guidance on ambulance livery will be issued. [7252]

There are already clear rules on the use of the national health service logo and crown badge by third party organisations. The law is similarly clear that green and yellow retro-reflective markings should only be used by NHS ambulance services.

We will communicate over the summer how these existing rules apply to independent ambulance services.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the reasons for the change in the number of emergency calls to ambulance services in the last five years. [7459]

The number of emergency calls to ambulance services has increased by around 6 to 7 per cent. a year since 2000–01. During this time, the number of calls per incident has increased. This is largely attributed to greater use of mobile phones.

Asylum Seekers

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what her policy is on restricting provision of medical care to failed asylum seekers; and if she will make a statement. [3864]

The Government are committed to providing protection for those individuals found to be genuinely in need. All applications for asylum are considered individually and on their own merits by the Home Office in line with the United Kingdom's obligations under the 1951 United Nations Refugee Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). However, any individual of any nationality who is found by the Home Office and the independent Immigration Appellate Authority not to be in need of asylum or international protection is expected to leave the UK.

Anyone is entitled to receive emergency or immediately necessary treatment to save life or to prevent a condition from becoming life-threatening, where in the clinical opinion of a health professional this is required. In the case of hospital treatment, however, they may be asked to pay for it if they are no longer eligible to receive it free of charge. A failed asylum seeker, who is receiving hospital treatment at the time their status was determined, will continue to receive that course of treatment free of charge until that course of treatment has been completed, or until they leave the country. Failed asylum seekers seeking routine elective hospital treatment will be expected to pay for it in the same way as any other chargeable overseas visitor.

General practices currently have the same discretion to accept or refuse applications from failed asylum seekers to join their lists of national health service patients as they have for applications from other people.

Audiology Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) what progress audiology clinics are making towards the Government's target that no one will wait longer than 18 weeks for treatment, including diagnostics, by 2008; [6462]

(2) how she plans to ensure that audiology departments meet the Government's target that no one will wait longer than 18-weeks for their treatment, including diagnostics, by 2008. [6471]

Progress towards meeting the 18-week target will be assessed by monitoring activity and waiting time data against the trajectories in strategic health authorities' (SHAs) local delivery plans. These data returns will for the first time, subject to successful piloting, include activity and waiting times for pure tone audiometry. SHAs are working with primary care trusts to develop their plans.

Care Homes

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) private, (b) voluntary and (c) local authority (i) care homes and (ii) care home places there have been in each year since 1997. [5598]

The table shows the number of care homes and places in England by provider for people aged 18 and over as at 31 March 1997 to 2001.

I understand from the Chair of the Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) that figures for later years were collected by the National Care Standards Commission, and now CSCI, but comparable details are not available.

Number of care homes and places, as at 31 March 1997 to 31 March 2001, England -- Rounded numbers

Residential Nursing(9)

Total

Local authority

Voluntary

Private(10)

Independent

Homes

1997

28,850

2,260

3,850

16,830

5,920

1998

28,950

2,230

3,930

16,610

6,180

1999

28,680

2,070

3,860

16,640

6,110

2000

28,320

2,030

3,950

16,460

5,880

2001

27,480

1,870

3,940

15,980

5,680

Places

1997

534,410

65,820

59,170

213,140

196,270

1998

553,490

63,980

60,790

223,130

205,590

1999

546,190

59,030

58,720

226,290

202,150

2000

539,240

55,460

60,720

229,720

193,330

2001

528,000

50,860

61,970

228,340

186,830

(9)Nursing home figures include places in general nursing homes, mental nursing homes, private hospitals and clinics.

(10)Includes private homes and small homes.

Notes:

1.Dual registered homes are included under nursing.

2.Figures may not sum due to rounding.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the nutritional quality of food in care homes. [7935]

A number of measures and strategies are in place to manage, monitor and screen the quality in care homes.

The Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) regulates care homes in accordance with statutory regulations and national minimum standards to ensure they provide for the needs of their residents. The Care Homes Regulations require homes to provide adequate quantities of suitable, wholesome and nutritious food for service users; and to maintain records of the food provided for service users in sufficient detail to enable inspectors to determine whether the diet is satisfactory, in relation to nutrition and otherwise.

Standard 19 of the national standards for care homes for older people sets out what care homes are expected to do to ensure residents are properly fed.

The CSCI will take swift action where it has concerns about the welfare of residents.

Childhood Development Reviews

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what advice she has given to primary care trusts on the ages at which children should receive development reviews. [7649]

Standard one of the national service framework for children, young people and maternity services sets out the key elements of the child health promotion programme, including developmental reviews and other health promotion services, and the ages at which these interventions would normally take.

Commission for Social Care Inspection

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what representations her Department has received on the proposal to abolish the Commission for Social Care Inspection. [5613]

Right hon. and hon. Members have tabled several questions on this topic recently. In addition, departmental Ministers have held exploratory discussions with both the Healthcare Commission and the Commission for Social Care Inspection.

Community Hospitals

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to her answer of 16 June 2005, Official Report, column 635W, on community hospitals, whether the decision on which services will be provided by each new community hospital will be made by (a) the Government and (b) primary care trusts. [6798]

The Department is in the early stages of developing its policy on community hospitals. Preliminary thinking is that the decision on the provision of services in community hospitals will be a joint one, involving the Department, strategic health authorities and primary care trusts working in partnership and informed by the forthcoming public consultation on services outside of hospitals.

Computer Crime

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many cases of computer (a) hacking, (b) fraud and (c) theft her Department recorded in each year since 2001–02; and for each year on how many occasions computer systems have been illegally accessed by computer hackers (i) within and (ii) outside her Department. [6952]

There have been no reported incidents of computer hacking or fraud on the Department's information technology (IT) systems either within or outside the Department since 2001–02 year.

The Department does not differentiate between losses and thefts nor do we record whether the theft was by an insider or outsider. The losses of IT equipment recorded since 2001–02 are shown in the table.

Financial year

Number of incidents

Total cost (£)

2001–02

77

70,500.00

2002–03

81

66,004.00

2003–04

70

56,917.00

2004–05

44

39,877.00

Dentistry

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans she has to increase access to NHS dentistry in Stroud constituency. [4345]

Cotswold and Vale Primary Care Trust (PCT), which commissions dental services for the Stroud constituency, has received £363,000 in capital grants and £155,000 in dental access money, which should lead to approximately 12,000 new national health service registrations.

One new dental surgery has opened in Stonehouse. In addition, negotiations are under way with two dentists, one in Stonehouse and the other in Cam, regarding expansion of their practices using currently vacant dental chairs, with a view to filling them with dentists recruited through the Department's overseas recruitment programme. The PCT is also currently looking to set up a new two-dentist surgery in the Stroud area.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many NHS dentists are practising in Portsmouth; and how many patients are registered with each. [6007]

As at the end of May 2005, there were 75 national health service dentists practising in Portsmouth City Primary Care Trust (PCT) area. Of these, the numbers of patients shown in the table were registered with each practice. Due to data protection rules, the individual dentists cannot be named, but are referred to as dentist 1, dentist 2, etc.

Each dentist in Portsmouth City PCT and the number of patients registered with each as at 31 May 2005

Dentist number

Number of children registered

Number of adults registered

Total number registered

1

859

3,356

4,215

2

657

3,102

3,759

3

756

2,270

3,026

4

743

2,256

2,999

5

563

2,416

2,979

6

676

2,238

2,914

7

658

2,229

2,887

8

896

1,887

2,783

9

681

2,095

2,776

10

641

2,019

2,660

11

706

1,938

2,644

12

526

1,827

2,353

13

382

1,902

2,284

14

527

1,628

2,155

15

525

1,520

2,045

16

447

1,572

2,019

17

480

1,532

2,012

18

387

1,574

1,961

19

382

1,504

1,886

20

515

1,343

1,858

21

390

1,349

1,739

22

353

1,309

1,662

23

324

1,230

1,554

24

332

1,220

1,552

25

387

1,066

1,453

26

369

1,044

1,413

27

356

1,027

1,383

28

331

1,052

1,383

29

356

1,020

1,376

30

379

934

1,313

31

269

1,012

1,281

32

315

917

1,232

33

392

785

1,177

34

789

384

1,173

35

388

759

1,147

36

293

849

1,142

37

410

692

1,102

38

288

775

1,063

39

717

182

899

40

661

143

804

41

520

259

779

42

761

12

773

43

620

151

771

44

174

595

769

45

608

125

733

46

235

383

618

47

145

449

594

48

325

241

566

49

116

383

499

50

181

318

499

51

327

158

485

52

352

124

476

53

417

5

422

54

280

108

388

55

234

123

357

56

116

239

355

57

99

196

295

58

205

77

282

59

65

211

276

60

198

18

216

61

121

79

200

62

119

2

121

63

0

87

87

64

0

54

54

65

14

32

46

66

0

0

0

67

0

0

0

68

0

0

0

69

0

0

0

70

0

0

0

71

0

0

0

72

0

0

0

73

0

0

0

74

0

0

0

75

0

0

0

Notes:

1.The data are snapshot information at the end of each month.

2.The information includes any dentist who had at least one active registration.

3.There are various reasons why a dentist may not have any registrations: in particular, specialists such as orthodontists.

4.It should be understood that personal dental service PDS registrations" generally have a longer re-registration period than general dental service (GDS) registrations. This means that a patient registered" under PDS might not have been still registered under GDS, had the dentist remained in GDS.

Departmental Union Representation

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many trade union learning representatives there are in her Department. [3316]

There are currently no trade union learning representatives in the Department. However, the Department is very positive about this initiative and the trade union side plan to pursue this issue again in the near future.

General Practitioners

To ask the Secretary of State for Healthwhat the ratio between the number of general practitioners to population was for each NHS region in the last year for which figures are available. [7063]

The number of general practitioners (GPs), excluding GP retainers and GP registrars, per 100,000 population in each Government office region as at December 2004 is shown in the table.

General medical practitioners (excluding retainers and registrars) by strategic health authority per 100,000 population, as at 31 December 2004—England -- Number (headcount)(11)

All practitioners (excluding retainers and registrars)(11)

Population(12)(13)

All practitioners (excluding retainers and registrars)(11) per 100,000 population

England

31,798

49,855,700

64

North East

Q10

County Durham and Tees Valley

751

1,146,900

65

Q09

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear

927

1,392,400

67

North West

Q15

Cheshire and Merseyside

1,540

2,354,500

65

Q13

Cumbria and Lancashire

1,177

1,919,000

61

Q14

Greater Manchester

1,526

2,531,000

60

Yorkshire and the Humber

Q11

North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire

1,037

1,640,800

63

Q23

South Yorkshire

827

1,272,600

65

Q12

West Yorkshire

1,397

2,095,900

67

East Midlands

Q25

Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland

894

1,581,500

57

Q24

Trent

1,628

2,670,800

61

West Midlands

Q27

Birmingham and The Black Country

1,401

2,273,400

62

Q26

Shropshire and Staffordshire

879

1,496,000

59

Q28

West Midlands South

974

1,550,500

63

East of England

Q02

Bedford and Hertfordshire

1,001

1,614,700

62

Q03

Essex

932

1,629,600

57

Q01

Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire

1,475

2,218,600

66

London

Q05

North Central London

811

1,220,200

66

Q06

North East London

921

1,530,800

60

Q04

North West London

1,176

1,814,700

65

Q07

South East London

1,007

1,511,800

67

Q08

South West London

846

1,310,400

65

South East

Q17

Hampshire and Isle of Wight

1,135

1,797,100

63

Q18

Kent and Medway

912

1,599,900

57

Q19

Surrey and Sussex

1,644

2,570,800

64

Q16

Thames Valley

1,329

2,112,500

63

South West

Q20

Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire

1,619

2,191,200

74

Q22

Somerset and Dorset

886

1,206,900

73

Q21

South West Peninsula

1,146

1,601,200

72

(11)General medical practitioners (excluding retainers and registrars) includes contracted GPs , QMS Others and PMS Others.

(12)Population data as at 2003.

(13)Population data is rounded to the nearest 100 for presentational purposes.

Source:

NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre General and Personal Medical Services Statistics.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many general practitioners in practice were aged (a) over 65 and (b) over 70 years in each NHS region in the last year for which figures are available. [7064]

The number of general practitioners (GPs), excluding GP retainers and GP registrars, aged between 65 and 69 and 70 and over in each Government office region as at December 2004 is shown in the table.

All general medical practitioners, excluding GP retainers and GP registrars, in England, of which aged 65–69 and 70 and over, as at 31 December 2004 -- Number (headcount)

All practitioners (excluding GP retainers and GP registrars)

of which:

65–69

70 and over

31,798

641

139

North East

Q09

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear

927

12

2

Q10

County Durham and Tees Valley

751

7

4

North West

Q13

Cumbria and Lancashire

1,177

21

3

Q14

Greater Manchester

1,526

37

9

Q15

Cheshire and Merseyside

1,540

24

2

Yorkshire and the Humber

Q11

North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire

1,037

18

3

Q12

West Yorkshire

1,397

34

6

Q23

South Yorkshire

827

18

9

East Midlands

Q24

Trent

1,628

24

4

Q25

Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland

894

7

0

West Midlands

Q26

Shropshire and Staffordshire

879

11

2

Q27

Birmingham and the Black Country

1,401

69

10

Q28

West Midlands South

974

8

8

East of England

Q01

Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire

1,475

11

1

Q02

Bedford and Hertfordshire

1,001

20

3

Q03

Essex

932

29

8

London

Q04

North West London

1,176

51

10

Q05

North Central London

811

43

8

Q06

North East London

921

56

21

Q07

South East London

1,007

43

9

Q08

South West London

846

25

10

South East

Q16

Thames Valley

1,329

15

2

Q17

Hampshire and Isle of Wight

1,135

4

0

Q18

Kent and Medway

912

25

2

Q19

Surrey and Sussex

1,644

17

1

South West

Q20

Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire

1,619

6

1

Q21

South West Peninsula

1,146

5

0

Q22

Somerset and Dorset

886

1

1

Note:

General medical practitioners, excluding retainers and registrars, includes contracted GPs, GMS others and PMS others.

Source:

NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre General and Personal Medical Services Statistics

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) formal and (b) self-construct general practitioner trainee places have been offered (i) in total and (ii) in each deanery in England in each year since 1997. [7455]

Decisions about how many general practitioner trainee places are to be offered each year are made locally by postgraduate deaneries, in consultation with their strategic health authorities. This information is not held centrally.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much funding has been made available for self construct general practitioner registrar training in (a) the Eastern Deanery, (b) Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire and (c) England in 2005–06; how much was made available in 2004–05; and if she will make a statement. [6195]

holding answer 21 June 2005

Funding for trainee general practitioners is part of the overall national health service training budgets allocated to strategic health authorities. The amounts that postgraduate deaneries actually receive is determined locally in the light of local priorities and national work force targets. This information is not held centrally.

HIV/AIDS

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) what categories of people (a) are and (b) are not entitled to free testing and treatment for HIV/AIDS on the NHS; [4216]

(2) to what categories of people it is planned to give access to free testing and treatment for HIV/AIDS; and whether those not resident in the UK will be given such access. [3744]

holding answers 13 and 15 June 2005

Anyone who is ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom is eligible to receive national health service hospital treatment free of charge (subject to any statutory charges that may apply, such as prescription charges).

The national health service (charges to overseas visitors) regulations 1989, as amended, specify that anyone who is not ordinarily resident in the UK must be treated as an overseas visitor, and is liable to pay for any NHS hospital treatment received unless they meet one of the exemption criteria in the regulations. One such exemption covers the initial diagnostic testing for HIV/AIDS and any associated counselling, so that these are free to all irrespective of residency status. Subsequent treatment, however, should the test prove positive, is not free to all and an overseas visitor who is not otherwise exempt under one of the other criteria is expected to pay for any HIV/AIDS treatment they receive. This has been the case since these regulations first came into force.

Hospital Beds

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average daily number of general and acute beds open overnight bed was in each of the last three years for (i) England and (ii) each NHS trust; and what the bed occupancy rate was. [7198]

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average daily cost of (a) an intensive care and (b) a high dependency bed is. [7614]

The national average cost of an occupied bed day in a discrete critical care unit is available in the annual reference costs publication.

The national schedule of reference costs for 2004 (the latest year available) shows that for activity undertaken within an national health service trust in England, the costs of an occupied bed day in different types of discrete critical care units are shown in the following table.

£

Unit type

National average cost per occupied bed day

Intensive therapy unit/intensive care unit

1,328

Burns intensive care unit

1,039

Neurosurgical intensive care unit

1,017

Spinal injuries intensive care unit

779

Renal intensive care unit

370

Cardiac intensive care unit

1,025

High dependency unit

584

Paediatric intensive care unit

1,702

Neonatal intensive care unit—level 1

838

Neonatal intensive care unit—level 2

560

A copy of the reference costs publication is available in the Library.

Hospital-acquired Infections

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what (a) advice is given on and (b) precautions are taken against the spread of MRSA in ambulances; and if she will make a statement. [6699]

All national health service organisations, including ambulance trusts, should have systems in place to minimise the risk to patients from health care associated infections as required by Standards for Better Health (July 2004). Infection control policies and any particular precautions for reducing the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are a matter for individual trusts. Advice on appropriate precautions to reduce the spread of infection has been published by the Department in the Health Service Circular 2000–02 and in Winning Ways—Working together to reduce Hospital Acquired Infection in England" (December 2003).

The Ambulance Service Association published Infection Prevention and Control: Managing Healthcare Associated Infection and Control of Serious Communicable Diseases", in June 2004. The guidance was reviewed recently by the Health Protection Agency, the National Patient Safety Agency and the Department's inspector of microbiology and is deemed to be suitable and sufficient, if used with robust auditing, to control MRSA and other health care associated infections. Additionally, the training and common core syllabus for ambulance personnel covers infection control, including reference to MRSA.

Hospitals (North-East)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many cleaners in (a) Sunderland Royal Hospital, (b) Hartlepool University Hospital and (c) Durham University Hospital are employed by (i) the NHS and (ii) private contractors. [6881]

Information is not gathered centrally on the number of cleaners employed by private contractors. The table shows the available data for the trusts concerned.

National health service hospital and community health services: Hotel, property and estates support workers in specified trusts as at 30 September 2004

Headcount

City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust

RLN

393

County Durham and Darlington Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

RXP

356

North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Trust

RVW

303

Tees and North East Yorkshire NHS Trust

RVX

44

Note:

Hotel, property and estates support workers include maintenance and works staff working in areas such as laundry, catering, domestic services and gardens.

Source:

Health and Social Care Information Centre Non-Medical Workforce Census

Identity Cards

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate she has made of the cost of equipping NHS premises with identity card readers. [6732]

As part of the broader Home Office-led identification cards programme, the Department is considering the costs and benefits of using ID cards within the national health service, including the cost of card readers. No decisions on the deployment, and hence the costs, of such readers have been made.

Midwifery Vacancies

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many midwife vacancies there are in each (a) London primary care trust and (b) London strategic health authority. [7463]

There are no current midwife vacancies recorded by primary care trust (PCT), as PCTs generally do not employ midwifery staff.

Information showing the latest figures available for midwifery vacancy rates and staff in post for London national health service trusts and strategic health authorities has been placed in the Library.

Ministerial Powers

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) if she will list the reserve powers she holds to take control of (a) primary care trusts, (b) hospital trusts, (c) ambulance trusts, (d) strategic health authorities and (e) mental health trusts; which section of the relevant legislation gives her each such power; under what circumstances each can be activated by her; and if she will make a statement; [6649]

(2) on how many occasions her reserve powers to take control of (a) primary care trusts, (b) hospital trusts, (c) ambulance trusts, (d) strategic health authorities and (e) mental health trusts have been used; if she will list the institutions involved; and if she will make a statement. [6650]

holding answer 23 June 2005

The legal powers that enable the Department to require individual trusts to change their senior management are contained within Section 13 of the Health and Social Care Act 2001. This states that the Secretary of State may make an intervention order if she is not satisfied that a national health service body is performing one or more of its functions adequately or at all, or that there are significant failings in the way that the body is being run. The order would specify the extent to which changes to senior management would have to be made.

The legal powers contained within Section 13 of the Health and Social Care Act 2001 that enable the Secretary of State for Health to require individual organisations to make senior management changes have not had to be used yet.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) how much funding has been allocated to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in each year since its inception; [4833]

(2) what budget was allocated to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in each year since its inception. [5686]

The funding allocated to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) by the Department and the Welsh Assembly Government is show in the table. The figures also include the allocation to NICE's funding for capital charges.

NICE running cost budget (£)

1999–2000

10,511,000

2000–01

11,158,000

2001–02

12,613,000

2002–03

14,771,000

2003–04

17,494,000

2004–05

19,391,000

2005–06

29,298,000

Notes:

1.Figures for 1999–2000 to 204–05 relate to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence, the predecessor of NICE.

2.The figure for 2005–06 reflects the incorporation of functions of the former Health Development Agency and the transfer of funding for the three confidential inquiries to the National Patient Safety Agency.

National Service Framework for Older People

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what progress has been made against the milestones set in Standard 7 of the national service framework for older people. [6399]

The Healthcare Commission is currently looking at progress in implementing the national service framework (NSF) for older people. There will be a particular focus on mental health services for older people. The Healthcare Commission's report will be published later in the year.

The Department's national clinical directors for older people's services and mental health services, Professor Louis Appleby and Professor Ian Philp, will shortly be launching a vision for the future of older people's mental health services, outlining the key components of a model service and building on the service developments the NSF for older people has initiated.

NHS Acute Hospital Trusts

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which NHS acute hospital trusts have financial deficits; and what the deficit is in each case. [7012]

holding answer 27 June 2005

The latest year for which audited data on the financial position of national health service organisations are available is 2003–04. The financial position for all NHS trusts with deficits is shown in the table.

£000

NHS trust name

2003–04 deficit position

Addenbrooke's NHS Trust

(921)

Airedale NHS Trust

(1,448)

Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust

(4,398)

Barnet, Enfield and Haringey MH NHS Trust

(924)

Berkshire Healthcare NHS Trust

(851)

Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre Hosps NHS Trust

(929)

Brighton and Sussex Univ Hosps NHS Trust

(7,912)

Buckinghamshire Hospitals NHS Trust

(5,237)

Buckinghamshire Mental Health NHS Trust

(1,689)

Burton Hospitals NHS Trust

(179)

Chelsea and Westminster Healthcare NHS Trust

(1,880)

East Kent Community NHS Trust

(225)

East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust

(3,934)

East Sussex County NHS Trust

(1,025)

East Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust

(1,787)

Essex Rivers Healthcare NHS Trust

(5,843)

Frimley Park Hospital NHS Trust

(524)

Good Hope Hospital NHS Trust

(5,014)

Hampshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust

(1,727)

Hereford Hospitals NHS Trust

(18)

Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust

(1,404)

Kettering General Hospital NHS Trust

(1,197)

Kings Lynn and Wisbech Hospitals NHS Trust

(5,358)

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

(309)

Local Health Partnerships NHS Trust

(489)

Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust

(8,968)

Mayday Healthcare NHS Trust

(163)

Mid Staffordshire Gen Hospitals NHS Trust

(509)

Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust

(18,637)

Milton Keynes General Hospital NHS Trust

(3,172)

North Cumbria Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

(4,133)

North Middlesex University Hosp NHS Trust

(989)

North West London Hospitals NHS Trust

(3,099)

North West Surrey MH NHS Partnership NHS Trust

(1,261)

Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust

(4,922)

Nuffield Orthopaedic NHS Trust

(309)

Papworth Hospital NHS Trust

(252)

Peterborough Hospitals NHS Trust

(969)

Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

(7,753)

Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust

(495)

Rob Jones and A Hunt Orthopaedic NHS Trust

(2,314)

Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust

(5,845)

Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust

(961)

Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Trust

(1,549)

Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust

(1,968)

Royal Wolverhampton Hospital NHS Trust

(7,612)

Sandwell and West Birmingham Hosps NHS Trust

(1,593)

Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust

(791)

South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust

(1,712)

Southampton University Hosps NHS Trust

(5,418)

St. George's Healthcare NHS Trust

(650)

St. Mary's NHS Trust

(503)

Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

(4,149)

Sussex Ambulance Service NHS Trust

(229)

The Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust

(963)

The Royal West Sussex NHS Trust

(3,572)

Trafford Healthcare NHS Trust

(744)

Walsall Hospitals NHS Trust

(1,057)

West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust

(519)

West London Mental Health NHS Trust

(1,369)

West Suffolk Hospitals NHS Trust

(2,501)

Weston Area Health NHS Trust

(1,514)

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

(3,400)

Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust

(12,801)

Worthing and Southlands Hospitals NHS Trust

(27)

Source:

2003–04 summarised accounts.

NHS Finances

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list the deficit or surplus at year end for 2004–05 for (a) the NHS in England, (b) each strategic health authority, (c) each NHS trust and (d) each primary care trust. [5782]

The latest year for which audited data on the financial position of national health service organisations is available is 2003–04. Information showing the financial position for the NHS in England—strategic health authorities (SHAs), NHS trusts and primary care trusts (PCTs)—has been placed in the Library.

Audited information in respect of the 2004–05 financial position of all SHAs, PCTs and NHS trusts will be published in their individual annual accounts and will be available centrally later this year.

NHS Patients (Overseas Treatment)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many NHS patients were treated abroad in each of the last five years; and in what countries. [4621]

Under patient choice, overseas treatment direct referral scheme approximately 890 patients had been referred for treatment since 2003. In addition, primary care trusts may also contract with healthcare providers abroad on an individual needs basis but this information is not collected by the Department.

Data on United Kingdom patients treated in the European Economic Area under the E111/112 schemes are not available in the format requested.

Physiotherapy

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what measures she is taking to ensure adequate retention to fill senior physiotherapy posts; and if she will make a statement. [8139]

It is the responsibility of local national health service employers and strategic health authorities to ensure there are sufficient numbers of physiotherapists to meet service needs. The Department is working closely with the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, the NHS work force review team and NHS organisations to ensure that local managers have access to a range of strategies across recruitment and retention, commissioning and skill mix.

Radiographers

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) radiographers of all grades and (b) radiographer trainees were employed in the NHS on average in (i) 1996, (ii) 2000 and (iii) 2004; and what estimate she has made of the numbers who were working on contracts requiring less than the standard 37.5 hours in 2004. [6317]

The information requested is shown in the table.

The standard hours for radiographers employed under Whitley Council terms and conditions are 35 hours. Agenda for Change" replaces these arrangements and, under the new terms and conditions, the standard hours for all staff are 37.5. Implementation of Agenda for Change" started in December 2004.

National health service hospital and community health services: Radiography staff in England by area of work, level and each specified contract as at 30 September in specified years -- Headcount

1996

Of which: part-time

2000

Of which: part-time

2004

Of which: part-time

Total Radiography staff

12,882

4,091

14,190

5,118

16,921

6,604

Radiography (Diagnostic)

11,525

3,804

12,649

4,765

14,932

6,019

Qualified staff

10,265

3,207

11,036

3,953

12,147

4,795

Consultant Therapist/Scientist

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

4

1

Manager

114

8

155

12

179

18

Therapist

9,647

3,015

10,271

3,723

11,954

4,773

Technician

487

182

595

216

0

0

Tutor

17

2

15

2

10

3

Non-qualified staff

1,260

597

1,613

812

2,785

1,224

Assistant Practitioner

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

75

14

Student/Trainee

47

18

19

2

80

8

Helper/Assistant

1,213

579

1,594

810

2,630

1,202

Radiography (Therapeutic)

1,357

287

1,541

353

1,989

585

Qualified staff

1,308

262

1,453

323

1,753

510

Consultant Therapist/Scientist

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

1

0

Manager

13

1

19

0

30

3

Therapist

1,295

261

1,434

323

1,722

507

Non-qualified staff

49

25

88

30

236

75

Assistant Practitioner

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

13

2

Student/Trainee

0

0

1

0

4

2

Helper/Assistant

49

25

87

30

219

71

n/a=Not applicable.

Source:

Health and Social Care Information Centre Non-Medical Workforce Census.

Residential Care

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many adults were placed in residential care out of area in each of the last five years; and what proportion of state funded adult placements this represented in each year. [7200]

The number and percentage of residential and nursing care residents funded by councils with social service responsibilities (CSSRs) placed outside their CSSR in England, 2000 to 2004, is shown in the table.

Number and percentage of residential and nursing care residents funded by CSSRs placed outside their CSSR in England, 2000–04—England, as at 31 March -- Rounded numbers

Total Residential care(14) Nursing care(15)

Number

Percentage(16)

Number

Percentage(17)

Number

Percentage(18)

2000

43,800

17

29,700

16

14,100

19

2001

44,000

17

29,800

16

14,100

20

2002

46,700

18

31,800

17

14,900

20

2003

47,700

17

31,800

15

15,900

20

2004

49,100

18

33,700

17

15,500

20

(14)Includes local authority staffed, voluntary and private care homes and small or unstaffed homes.

(15)General and mental nursing homes only.

(16)As a percentage of all CSSR supported residents.

(17)As a percentage of all CSSR supported residents in residential care.

(18)As a percentage of all CSSR supported residents in nursing care.

Note:

Figures may not add up due to rounding.

Source:

SRI form.

Rural Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will amend the health service's funding formula to take account of costs incurred in delivering health services to sparsely populated rural areas. [7763]

holding answer 28 June 2005

The funding formula provides the best available measure of health need in all areas. In calculating health need in rural areas, it takes account of the effects of access, transport and poverty.

The advisory committee on resource allocation (ACRA), which is made up of national health service managers, academics and general practitioners, oversees the weighted capitation formula. ACRA has looked at the issue of rurality on many occasions and has recommended that no further adjustment is needed to reflect rural areas. ACRA will continue to oversee the development of the formula, and look to ensure equity in resource allocation.

Scanner (North Durham)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) what progress has been made by Alliance Medical in identifying a suitable site for a scanner in North Durham; [7553]

(2) who Alliance Medical has consulted during their search for an appropriate site for a scanner in North Durham. [7554]

holding answers 27 June 2005

Alliance Medical Ltd. (AML) has been working alongside County Durham and Tees Valley Strategic Health Authority's (SHA) assistant director of performance to establish an appropriate site for the mobile unit. I understand that both AML and the trust radiology department consider the site suitable and that they are awaiting confirmation from the SHA that the Consett site will be commissioned.

Sexual Health

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what recent assessment she has made of the capacity of sexual health clinics; and if she will make a statement. [7517]

The Department has commissioned the Medical Foundation for AIDS and Sexual Health to undertake a two-year national review of genito urinary medicine (GUM) services, which will help to assess capacity issues and disseminate good practice. This began in autumn 2004 and will cover all GUM clinics. Visits to services are already under way in nine strategic health authorities, and reports are being fed back to the primary care trusts as the review proceeds.

The Health Protection Agency (HPA) collects and publishes data on waiting times for GUM services. The HPA have published two reports to date, for May and November 2004, and these are available from their website at www.hpa.org.uk

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will take steps to ensure that the full amount of funding allocated to sexual health reform in the Public Health White Paper is spent on sexual health and HIV services. [7758]

Improved sexual health performance management has been introduced to ensure that the new investment of £300 million over three years, provided through the Public Health White Paper, achieves the desired outcomes. In addition to the public service agreement target to reduce the under-18 conception rate by 50 per cent., by 2010 as a part of a broader strategy to improve sexual health, primary care trusts must now include sexual health in their local delivery plans. These plans must include measures to achieve improved genito-urinary medicine (GUM) clinic waiting times, reduced gonorrhoea rates and improved uptake of Chlamydia screening. In addition, the Department has commissioned the Medical Foundation for AIDS and Sexual Health to undertake a national review of GUM services, which is now under way. A national audit of contraceptive services is also in preparation and we are working to strengthen the monitoring role of strategic health authorities. Data collection is being improved, to provide information against which performance can be measured, including the Health Protection Agency's published data on GUM waiting times.

Suicide

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what measures are in place to reduce the incidence of suicide in people aged (a) 50 years or over and (b) 65 years or over. [6397]

The suicide prevention strategy annual report of progress 2004 sets out the actions that are under way to reduce the number of suicides in the general population. Although there are no specific actions under way targeting those 50 years or over, many of the measures in place will help prevent suicides among all age groups.

The our healthier nation target is to reduce the overall death rate from suicide and undetermined injury from a baseline rate of 9.2 deaths per 100,000 population in 1995–97 to 7.4 deaths per 100,000 population in 2009–11. The latest available data for the three years 2001–03 show a rate of 8.6 deaths per 100,000 population—a reduction of 6 per cent. from the baseline. The latest data in the 50 and over age group show that this rate has fallen from the baseline rate of 10.6 deaths per 100,000 population to 10.1 deaths, a fall of 5 per cent. over the period. For the 65 and over age group the rate has fallen from the baseline rate of 10.1 deaths per 100,000 population to 8.91 deaths, a fall of 11.4 per cent. over the period.

Taxis

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much the Department has spent on taxis in each of the last five years. [6513]

The table shows the amounts the Department spent on its central contract for taxis.

Amount (£000)

2000–01

270

2001–02

312

2002–03

337

2003–04

403

2004–05

550

Other taxi fares may be claimed through staff expenses, but this information cannot be made available without disproportionate cost.

Education and Skills

Adoption

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many people by Government office region were rejected as potential adopters because they were overweight in (a) 2002, (b) 2003 and (c) 2004. [7879]

Adult Literacy

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what assessment she has made of the level of adult literacy in each London borough. [7474]

The Skills for Life Survey: A national needs and impact survey of literacy, numeracy and ICT skills" (DfES, October 2003) provides the latest estimates of literacy levels across England. The survey assessed the literacy, numeracy and ICT skills of around 8,000 adults aged 16 and above in England.

The findings for the London boroughs are shown in the table. The proportion of adults with literacy skills below level 1 varies from 38 per cent. in Newham to 4 per cent. in the City of London. The assessment levels correspond to the new literacy and numeracy core curriculum and National Standards: Level 1 is broadly equivalent to a lower grade GCSE (grade D-G) and Level 2 to a higher grade GCSE (grade A*-C).

A copy of the survey report is available in the House of Commons Library and on the DfES website: www.dfes.gov.uk

Adult Literacy levels across London drawn from the Skills for Life Survey(19)

Total entry level Level 1 skills Level 2 skills

Literacy

Number

Proportion (%)

Number

Proportion (%)

Number

Proportion (%)

Barking and Dagenham

19,340

19

47,690

47

33,800

34

Barnet

20,670

10

83,250

41

99,720

49

Bexley

8,695

6

71,530

52

57,550

42

Brent

34,400

19

62,360

35

82,950

46

Bromley

20,500

11

60,000

32

105,500

57

Camden

9,210

7

47,490

35

78,960

58

City of London

215

4

1,560

30

3,495

66

Croydon

27,500

13

96,410

45

90,290

42

Ealing

26,980

13

86,730

42

91,420

45

Enfield

26,500

15

75,510

43

74,310

42

Greenwich

22,380

16

61,070

44

54,950

40

Hackney

24,520

18

46,430

34

64,410

48

Hammersmith and Fulham

7,515

6

43,100

36

68,440

57

Haringey

26,620

18

49,230

33

73,470

49

Harrow

17,440

13

53,390

40

63,680

47

Havering

12,730

9

61,330

44

65,670

47

Hillingdon

22,870

15

55,600

36

76,080

49

Hounslow

21,400

15

58,430

41

63,380

44

Islington

9,395

8

48,720

40

64,290

53

Kensington and Chelsea

5,620

5

34,920

31

71,580

64

Kingston upon Thames

8,940

9

31,320

32

57,090

59

Lambeth

22,200

12

70,250

37

95,940

51

Lewisham

25,440

15

60,160

36

81,900

49

Merton

11,870

9

51,700

41

63,190

50

Newham

59,900

38

44,170

28

53,330

34

Redbridge

23,750

16

63,720

42

65,550

43

Richmond upon Thames

8,990

8

31,210

27

74,420

65

Southwark

30,740

19

57,010

35

77,500

47

Sutton

14,100

12

39,350

34

61,880

54

Tower Hamlets

24,240

18

48,300

37

58,680

45

Waltham Forest

22,690

16

66,510

46

55,920

39

Wandsworth

10,860

6

58,730

31

118,000

63

Westminster

12,290

10

41,060

32

75,440

59

(19)Source: DfES, 2003

Arson

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many arson attacks there were on schools in England in 2004. [7355]

The most recent data published by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is for the year ending 30 September 2004. In that year there were a total of 688 reported deliberate fires in schools in England.

Behaviour Improvement Programme

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much the Government are spending in 2005–06 on behaviour and attendance-related activities and projects. [7705]

Schools and local authorities use their core funding to varying degrees to support behaviour and attendance, but the amounts spent on these activities are not separately identified. In addition to these sums, the Government make available specific funding—through the Standards Fund or through direct grant support, earmarked for behaviour and attendance related activities. In the 2005–06 financial year, this funding is expected to amount to about £310 million through the Behaviour Improvement Programme, the Learning Mentor and Learning Support Unit strands of Excellence in Cities, and the Behaviour and Attendance strands of the Primary and Secondary National Strategies.

Class Sizes

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the average class size in (a) primary and junior schools and (b) secondary schools in (i) West Sussex, (ii) Kent, (iii) Durham, (iv)the East Riding of Yorkshire and (v) each English county was in each of the last eight years. [7915]

The information requested is shown in the table.

Maintained primary and secondary schools: average class sizePosition as at January each year: 1998 to 2005 (provisional)—by each English county local education authority and East Riding of Yorkshire local education authority(20)(21)

Classes taught by one teacher

1998

1999

2000

2001

Primary(22)

Secondary

Primary(22)

Secondary

Primary(22)

Secondary

Primary(22)

Secondary

West Sussex

27.0

21.6

27.2

21.4

27.3

21.8

26.9

22.2

Kent(23)

28.2

20.4

Kent(24)

28.1

20.8

27.7

21.0

27.4

21.3

Durham

28.1

22.3

27.2

22.6

26.6

22.0

26.1

22.2

East Riding of Yorkshire

28.7

21.6

28.3

22.1

27.4

22.0

27.3

21.8

Bedfordshire

27.0

22.4

26.7

22.3

26.1

22.6

25.2

22.5

Buckinghamshire

28.1

21.0

27.8

21.6

26.6

22.2

26.4

21.6

Cambridgeshire(23)

28.5

22.0

Cambridgeshire(24)

28.7

22.8

28.0

23.3

27.5

23.5

Cheshire(23)

27.2

21.4

Cheshire(24)

27.4

21.3

26.8

21.0

26.3

21.0

Cornwall

27.6

22.4

27.9

22.3

27.3

22.6

26.5

22.6

Cumbria

26.2

21.1

25.8

21.0

25.2

21.3

25.0

21.1

Derbyshire

29.5

22.2

28.2

22.4

28.3

22.5

27.3

22.2

Devon(23)

28.0

21.7

Devon(24)

26.7

22.0

26.5

22.4

26.5

22.5

Dorset

27.5

22.5

27.0

22.0

26.4

22.6

26.1

22.8

East Sussex

28.3

21.4

28.7

22.1

28.2

22.1

28.2

22.3

Essex(23)

27.6

21.7

Essex(24)

27.7

21.6

27.4

22.0

26.9

21.9

Gloucestershire

27.5

21.7

27.5

21.2

27.3

21.4

26.3

21.4

Hampshire

28.3

22.4

28.2

22.7

28.0

22.9

27.5

22.9

Hertfordshire

27.2

20.2

27.1

20.6

27.1

20.8

26.9

21.0

Lancashire(23)

28.9

22.5

Lancashire(24)

28.2

22.4

27.7

22.7

27.3

22.6

Leicestershire

26.9

22.3

26.7

22.4

26.7

22.8

26.3

23.2

Lincolnshire

27.0

20.3

27.3

20.6

27.3

21.2

26.6

21.4

Norfolk

26.4

20.2

25.9

20.4

25.9

21.0

25.4

21.2

North Yorkshire

26.8

21.0

26.6

21.2

25.8

21.1

25.3

21.1

Northamptonshire

27.3

21.4

27.3

21.5

26.8

21.6

25.9

21.5

Northumberland

27.3

23.0

26.4

23.0

25.4

22.6

24.9

22.4

Nottinghamshire(23)

28.8

21.7

Nottinghamshire(24)

28.4

21.8

27.8

22.0

27.2

22.0

Oxfordshire

27.5

22.0

27.1

22.1

26.8

22.6

25.9

22.4

Shropshire(23)

27.3

22.0

Shropshire(24)

26.9

21.6

26.0

21.6

25.3

22.2

Somerset

27.8

23.9

27.9

23.9

27.6

23.6

26.9

23.9

Staffordshire

27.4

22.3

26.7

22.3

26.6

22.4

25.9

21.9

Suffolk

25.0

20.8

24.9

20.8

24.9

21.1

24.7

21.4

Surrey

26.7

21.6

26.9

22.2

27.0

22.3

26.8

22.5

Warwickshire

28.5

21.9

27.6

21.7

27.5

21.7

26.7

22.0

Wiltshire

27.2

21.3

27.3

22.0

26.7

21.9

26.3

21.7

Hereford and Worcester(23)

26.7

22.1

Worcestershire(24)

27.0

22.3

26.8

22.2

26.2

22.0

2002 2003 2004 2005 (provisional)

Primary(22)

Secondary

Primary(22)

Secondary

Primary(22)

Secondary

Primary(22)

Secondary

West Sussex

26.1

22.0

26.1

22.1

26.4

22.0

26.5

22.1

Kent(23)

Kent(24)

27.2

21.0

27.0

21.1

26.9

21.1

26.6

21.0

Durham

25.3

21.9

25.1

21.6

25.1

21.8

25.0

21.7

East Riding of Yorkshire

26.6

22.2

26.4

22.2

26.3

21.6

26.0

21.9

Bedfordshire

24.6

22.2

24.6

22.0

24.4

22.0

24.6

22.2

Buckinghamshire

25.5

22.1

25.7

21.8

25.6

21.4

25.5

21.5

Cambridgeshire(23)

Cambridgeshire(24)

27.1

23.0

27.1

22.8

27.1

23.1

26.9

23.1

Cheshire(23)

Cheshire(24)

25.6

21.2

25.8

21.1

25.8

21.3

25.7

21.2

Cornwall

26.3

22.4

26.0

22.4

26.2

22.3

26.1

22.4

Cumbria

24.5

20.7

24.5

20.8

24.7

20.7

24.6

21.2

Derbyshire

27.0

22.3

26.9

21.9

27.0

22.1

26.7

22.0

Devon(23)

Devon(24)

25.4

22.2

25.7

22.4

25.8

22.2

25.8

21.8

Dorset

25.4

22.7

25.5

22.0

25.2

22.0

25.4

22.0

East Sussex

27.6

21.9

27.5

21.8

27.5

21.9

27.6

21.8

Essex(23)

Essex(24)

26.5

21.9

26.6

21.8

26.7

21.9

26.6

22.0

Gloucestershire

25.4

21.9

25.3

21.9

25.7

21.4

26.0

20.7

Hampshire

27.1

22.9

27.2

22.8

27.2

22.7

27.2

22.8

Hertfordshire

26.9

20.9

26.6

20.9

26.6

20.8

26.6

20.8

Lancashire(23)

Lancashire(24)

26.7

22.4

26.5

22.5

26.4

22.6

26.3

22.2

Leicestershire

25.9

22.7

26.4

22.5

26.4

22.6

26.2

22.4

Lincolnshire

26.0

21.3

26.1

21.4

26.2

21.5

26.3

21.3

Norfolk

25.1

20.7

25.1

21.0

25.5

20.9

25.8

21.5

North Yorkshire

24.6

20.6

24.5

20.6

24.4

20.8

24.5

20.5

Northamptonshire

25.5

21.8

25.7

21.9

25.9

21.4

25.9

21.4

Northumberland

24.5

22.6

24.7

22.4

25.0

22.1

24.5

22.0

Nottinghamshire(23)

Nottinghamshire(24)

26.8

21.5

26.9

21.5

26.7

21.5

26.7

21.2

Oxfordshire

25.1

22.1

24.9

22.0

25.2

21.5

25.5

21.3

Shropshire(23)

Shropshire(24)

25.6

22.3

25.6

22.0

25.9

22.2

26.6

21.8

Somerset

26.0

23.5

26.2

23.5

26,1

23.6

25.9

23.3

Staffordshire

25.2

22.0

25.8

21.8

25.9

21.7

26.0

21.5

Suffolk

24.6

21.3

24.5

21.4

24.5

21.8

24.6

21.8

Surrey

26.4

22.0

26.3

22.1

26.3

22.3

26.7

22.5

Warwickshire

26.4

22.0

26.3

21.9

26.1

21.7

26.0

21.5

Wiltshire

26.1

21.9

25.8

22.2

25.9

21.8

25.8

21.6

Hereford and Worcester(23)

Worcestershire(24)

25.8

22.4

25.6

22.4

25.8

22.2

25.7

21.8

(20)Includes middle schools as deemed.

(21)Classes as taught during a single selected period in each school on the day of the census in January.

(22)Includes junior schools.

(23)Before Local Government Reorganisation.

(24)After Local Government Reorganisation.

Source:

Annual Schools' Census

Computer Crime

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many cases of computer (a) hacking, (b) fraud and (c) theft her Department recorded in each year since 2001–02; and for each year, on how many occasions computer systems have been illegally accessed by computer hackers (i) within and (ii)outside her Department. [7188]

The number of cases of computer hacking detected in the Department for Education and Skills was nil in 2001–02, 2002–03 and 2003–04. There was one case of computer hacking in 2004–05 which was perpetrated by an outsider. The number of cases of fraud detected was three in 2001–02 and two in 2002–03. All were perpetrated by persons outside the Department. There was no fraud, internal or external, in 2003–04 or 2004–05. The number of cases of computer theft detected was nine in 2001–02, six in 2002–03 all perpetrated by insiders, 23 in 2003–04 of which 22 were perpetrated by insiders and one by persons outside the Department and 14 in 2004–05—all were perpetrated by insiders.

Education (South Devon)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many young people are expected to be on the Prince's Trust Teams programme run by Dartington Tech in this financial year; how many there were in each of the last three years; and if she will make a statement on education funding in South Devon. [6262]

holding answer 22 June 2005

The number of young people on Prince's Trust Teams in programmes run by Dartington Tech is as follows.

Number

2002–03

195

2003–04

175

2004–05

215

Devon and Cornwall Learning and Skills Council have set out specific priorities for the coming year, in line with national and regional activities. These include ensuring access to education and training opportunities for 16 to 18-year-olds; increasing the take-up of apprenticeships; tackling basic literacy and numeracy problems; and providing first-time Level 2 opportunities.

In addition, the local LSC has a significant range of co-financed (European Social Fund) projects tackling skills shortages and addressing issues of social inclusion on top of activities funded from mainstream resources.

Taken together, this provides a significant response to the learning and skills needs in the local LSC area.

Educational Psychologists

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills

(1) what plans she has to increase the supply of educational psychologists; [7853]

(2) what progress she is making in her consultation on the role of educational psychologists; [7854]

(3) how many vacancies there were for educational psychologists in England in (a) April 2004 and (b) April 2005. [7963]

Decisions on the recruitment, retention or deployment of educational psychologists (EPs) are matters for local authorities as employers to determine in light of local circumstances and available resources.

The terms of reference for the proposed review of the functions and contribution of EPs are currently being developed in consultation with representatives of the local authority employers. Subject to any points arising from these contacts, we would expect to invite tenders for the work shortly.

Vacancy information for EPs is collected in January of each year. In 2004 there were 113 vacant full-time permanent posts and 2,100 full-time equivalent EPs in service. Provisional estimates indicate that there were 100 vacant full-time permanent posts in 2005 and 2,160 in service. Posts were regarded as vacant where there was no permanent appointee and where they were advertised prior to the survey date.

Family Resolutions Project

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills

(1) what estimates her Department had made of the number of likely participants prior to the setting up of the Family Resolutions Project; [4686]

(2) what the estimated costs of running the Family Resolutions Project are; [4687]

(3) how many parents have taken part in the Family Resolutions Pilot Project to date; and how many have accepted mediation services as part of the project. [4688]

pursuant to the reply, 15 June 2005, Official Report, c. 483W

Confirmed expenditure on the Family Resolutions Pilot Project is £190,628, up to 31 May 2005. This replaces the previous figure given of £173,669 for spend to 14 June 2005. Costs for June cannot yet be confirmed.

Foster Care

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the total cost was of the mostexpensive external foster care placement in each Government Office region in (a) 2002, (b) 2003 and (c) 2004. [7733]

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the average cost per child of external foster care for local authorities was in each Government office region in (a) 2002, (b) 2003 and (c) 2004. [7880]

The average gross weekly expenditure to local authorities, per looked after child, of foster care provided by others from 2001–02 to 2003–04 is set out in the table:

£000

Average gross weekly expenditure per looked after child in foster care provided by others Average gross weekly expenditure per looked after child in foster care provided by others (including respite and short term placements and placed for adoption)

Year ending

March 2002

March 2003

March 2004

North East

1,031

696

808

North West

774

579

652

South East

905

973

933

East Midlands

1,536

757

832

East

748

693

686

South West

695

848

744

West Midlands

695

727

790

Yorkshire and

the Humber

783

592

797

London

626

817

791

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the total expenditure on external foster care by local authorities was in each Government office region in (a) 2002, (b) 2003 and (c) 2004. [7881]

The gross total cost to local authorities for children looked after in foster care placements provided by others from 2001–02 to 2003–04 is shown in the table:

Gross total cost for children looked after in foster care provided by others -- £000

Year ending 31 March:

2002

2003

2004

North East

5,806

9,216

10,815

North West

13,713

18,901

25,802

South East

17,424

25,874

32,380

East Midlands

7,878

8,068

11,545

East

13,678

21,759

27,585

South West

10,056

12,872

17,431

West Midlands

30,614

31,198

34,220

Yorkshire and the Humber

7,398

10,539

20,022

London

71,292

94,749

104,734

Milton Keynes Academy

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what assessment she has made of the implications of the withdrawal from the Milton Keynes academy project of Global Education Management Systems for the academy's ability to deliver future academy projects. [7432]

Global Education Management Systems (GEMS) supports the aims and the ethos of the Academies' Programme and has a proven track record in supporting and managing schools. My officials are continuing their discussions with GEMS and expect to identify suitable academy proposals which would benefit from GEMS' support and experience.

New Schools

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many new (a) primary and (b) secondary schools were built in each English county in each of the last eight years. [7913]

The construction of new schools is decided upon by each local authority in accordance with its asset management plan. Figures on how many new(a) primary and (b) secondary schools were built in each English county in each of the last eight years are not held centrally.

Postgraduate Science Degrees

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many (a) UK, (b) EU and (c) non-EU students are studying science postgraduate degrees in England in 2004–05; and what proportion of all postgraduate students this represents in each case. [8033]

Figures for the 2003/04 academic year are given in the table below; data for 2004/05 are not yet available.

Enrolments on postgraduate science courses in English HEIs in 2003/04(25)

United Kingdom

European Union

Other overseas

Science postgraduates(26)

89,755

11,230

30,040

All postgraduates

269,320

27,490

80,340

Science as a percentage of total

postgraduates

33

41

37

(25)Figures stated are given on a full-person equivalent basis, which is the proportion of an enrolment's activity in that subject area.

(26)Science includes medicine and dentistry, subjects allied to medicine, biological sciences, veterinary, agriculture and related sciences, physical sciences, mathematical and computing sciences, architecture and related studies and engineering and technology.

Note:

Figures are on a DfES whole-year basis and are rounded to the nearest 5.

Source:

Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA)

Press Officers

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many press officers the Department and its predecessors employed in each year since 1997; and what the cost was in each year. [8138]

The information requested is set out in the table:

Staff numbers

Spend (£000)

1996–97

19

702

1997–98

20.5

729

1998–99

29.5

969

1999–2000

28

997

2000–01

28

1,307

2001–02

28

1,097

2002–03

23.4

1,314

2003 -04

18.5

1,352

2004–05

18

1,200

Religious Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if she will introduce compulsory religious education in all schools which focuses equally on all the main religions in England. [7298]

All maintained schools must provide religious education (RE) for all registered pupils. Locally agreed RE syllabuses must reflect the fact that religious traditions in the country are in the main Christian while taking account of the teaching and practices of other principal religions. The new national framework for RE will provide opportunities to develop pupils knowledge and understanding of Christianity, other principal religions, other religious traditions and other world views, in line with Government's goals of inclusion, tolerance and diversity.

School Building

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what assessment has been made of the need for school building maintenance, updated for current price levels for (a) primary, (b) secondary and (c) other schools in each London borough, in the last five years. [7249]

Data on school buildings maintenance have been supplied to the Department twice; firstly in 2000–01 and secondly in 2003. The following table shows, for the two data collections, primary, secondary and other schools figures for each London local education authority. Costs have been updated to current costs. In addition to backlog repair work, the figures cover work needed over a five year period from the dates of the assessments, including cyclical and scheduled maintenance.

Central Government capital support for investment in schools has increased from under £700 million in 1996–97 to £5.5 billion this year and will rise further to £6.3 billion by 2007–08. Progress is being made year-by-year in improving the quality of the school building stock.

Schools maintenance requirements -- £

Primary Secondary Other

2001

2003

2001

2003

2001

2003

Barking and Dagenham

2,243,698

39,410,803

4,201,813

22,906,721

27,188

123,934

Barnet

39,024,662

40,107,660

24,673,568

34,029,880

1,915,432

2,534,913

Bexley

20,360,801

21,722,163

19,803,174

22,846,338

1,337,509

1,579,120

Brent

29,010,597

25,072,826

20,033,334

17,006,117

2,196,700

1,865,460

Bromley

19,414,064

24,100,807

20,216,776

26,389,627

920,896

1,585,557

Camden

8,573,851

12,159,257

11,641,138

11,119,195

1,445,671

1,330,147

Croydon

13,422,452

14,553,936

12,783,519

13,776,575

1,370,416

1,422,410

Ealing

34,045,012

31,082,778

17,170,999

15,440,938

2,375,832

2,243,389

Enfieid

37,183,816

28,203,143

31,075,780

22,440,115

3,565,292

2,372,245

Greenwich

35,522,158

39,219,290

11,743,286

26,946,521

6,243,138

4,184,282

Hackney

28,900,873

36,353,462

16,131,501

21,767,674

3,952,027

3,074,077

Hammersmith and Fulham

12,119,573

9,928,217

12,038,322

11,371,871

3,032,569

3,157,738

Haringey

35,945,789

13,790,757

1,673,651

Harrow

11,433,656

13,495,330

8,461,492

11,153,747

6,745,305

7,135,427

Havering

38,425,867

33,035,051

29,858,490

28,783,241

1,410,024

1,522,827

Hillingdon

20,214,363

21,587,648

14,246,302

16,975,522

1,624,914

1,809,548

Hounslow

23,175,540

29,106,708

17,527,247

27,857,095

1,574,181

3,246,966

Islington

34,505,108

23,651,347

18,588,643

12,497,917

3,827,587

2,475,645

Kensington and Chelsea

7,801,892

6,454,041

1,968,212

2,212,459

1,625,229

1,460,770

Kingston upon Thames

12,486,084

17,837,505

17,660,145

23,544,250

1,321,771

1,938,597

Lambeth

54,827,241

44,242,445

8,344,663

Lewisham

39,378,088

35,584,122

23,882,208

23,306,117

4,061,893

3,882,120

Merton

10,474,790

12,148,736

7,864,319

8,892,701

9,226,542

1,967,176

Newham

40,501,813

28,281,733

23,151,778

19,748,374

2,547,393

911,797

Redbridge

25,335,410

22,578,687

22,502,056

21,320,757

1,937,394

1,120,458

Richmond upon Thames

13,120,661

13,795,165

10,220,238

762,559

764,066

Southwark

22,846,082

29,505,233

10,992,214

17,986,923

4,623,772

4,434,201

Sutton

9,249,811

10,388,821

13,107,369

8,964,390

1,533,305

928,842

Tower Hamlets

21,170,592

13,587,966

19,349,058

12,377,368

4,010,666

1,356,707

Waltham Forest

20,079,861

14,788,170

15,492,380

10,053,638

3,025,488

1,900,798

Wandsworth

40,590,068

40,590,068

29,674,514

29,674,514

6,990,906

6,990,906

Westminster

16,589,720

14,082,979

21,714,889

13,172,533

1,082,643

1,957,073

'—'indicates no data supplied, or data appraised as unreliable.

School Funding

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the funding per pupil in (a) primary and junior schools and (b) secondary schools in (i) West Sussex, (ii) Kent, (iii) Durham, (iv)the East Riding of Yorkshire and (v) each English county was in each of the last eight years. [7914]

The figures requested are expressed in real terms and set out in the following tables:

Pupils aged three to 10 -- £

LEA

1998–99

1999–2000

2000–01

2001–02

2002–03

2003–04

2004–05

2005–06

938

West Sussex

2,430

2,550

2,750

2,910

2,970

3,110

3,220

3,360

886

Kent

2,480

2,620

2,840

3,000

3,050

3,180

3,330

3,450

840

Durham

2,310

2,470

2,740

2,960

2,990

3,190

3,300

3,540

811

East Riding of Yorkshire

2,260

2,420

2,650

2,810

2,820

3,010

3,110

3,290

815

North Yorkshire

2,310

2,480

2,710

2,850

2,890

3,120

3,220

3,390

820

Bedfordshire

2,390

2,540

2,780

2,940

2,980

3,120

3,230

3,410

825

Buckinghamshire

2,450

2,600

2,810

2,970

3,020

3,150

3,290

3,450

830

Derbyshire

2,250

2,410

2,630

2,750

2,820

3,000

3,120

3,290

835

Dorset

2,350

2,480

2,690

2,810

2,840

2,960

3,080

3,230

845

East Sussex

2,500

2,660

2,900

3,050

3,090

3,220

3,360

3,510

850

Hampshire

2,360

2,490

2,700

2,860

2,910

3,060

3,170

3,300

855

Leicestershire

2,260

2,400

2,600

2,730

2,750

2,860

2,970

3,120

860

Staffordshire

2,200

2,340

2,540

2,680

2,680

2,910

3,010

3,180

865

Wiltshire

2,360

2,500

2,700

2,820

2,870

3,100

3,190

3,360

873

Cambridgeshire

2,310

2,480

2,680

2,800

2,840

3,090

3,220

3,380

875

Cheshire

2,250

2,400

2,610

2,750

2,790

2,970

3,070

3,260

878

Devon

2,440

2,540

2,740

2,870

2,920

3,100

3,210

3,360

881

Essex

2,480

2,610

2,830

2,990

3,040

3,200

3,320

3,460

885

Worcestershire

2,300

2,400

2,610

2,740

2,770

2,900

3,010

3,180

888

Lancashire

2,350

2,520

2,750

2,900

2,950

3,100

3,230

3,420

891

Nottinghamshire

2,270

2,410

2,650

2,780

2,830

2,990

3,080

3,260

893

Shropshire

2,350

2,500

2,710

2,870

2,900

3,110

3,230

3,410

908

Cornwall

2,400

2,560

2,780

2,940

2,990

3,150

3,250

3,420

909

Cumbria

2,280

2,450

2,700

2,870

2,910

3,170

3,280

3,460

916

Gloucestershire

2,330

2,490

2,700

2,840

2,880

3,010

3,100

3,280

919

Hertfordshire

2,450

2,570

2,790

2,930

2,970

3,140

3,260

3,380

925

Lincolnshire

2,350

2,490

2,700

2,860

2,920

3,120

3,220

3,410

926

Norfolk

2,390

2,550

2,770

2,930

2,980

3,160

3,290

3,460

928

Northamptonshire

2,290

2,450

2,650

2,780

2,840

3,060

3,160

3,340

929

Northumberland

2,280

2,430

2,650

2,810

2,850

3,090

3,220

3,420

931

Oxfordshire

2,470

2,610

2,830

2,980

3,030

3,180

3,310

3,450

933

Somerset

2,340

2,500

2,720

2,850

2,900

3,060

3,170

3,310

935

Suffolk

2,340

2,470

2,670

2,790

2,820

2,980

3,110

3,260

936

Surrey

2,460

2,580

2,780

2,930

2,980

3,130

3,230

3,420

937

Warwickshire

2,270

2,430

2,620

2,760

2,820

3,030

3,140

3,300

Pupils aged 11 to 15 -- £

LEA

1998–99

1999–2000

2000–01

2001–02

2002–03

2003–04

2004–05

2005–06

938

West Sussex

3,220

3,290

3,520

3,710

3,790

3,820

4,020

4,110

886

Kent

3,300

3,380

3,660

3,850

3,940

3,980

4,230

4,300

840

Durham

3,240

3,360

3,650

3,860

3,910

3,970

4,140

4,340

811

East Riding of Yorkshire

3,070

3,170

3,440

3,580

3,640

3,610

3,820

3,950

815

North Yorkshire

3,120

3,220

3,480

3,620

3,690

3,680

3,860

3,980

820

Bedfordshire

3,220

3,320

3,630

3,860

3,950

3,910

4,110

4,240

825

Buckinghamshire

3,250

3,340

3,600

3,800

3,900

3,940

4,130

4,240

830

Derbyshire

3,060

3,150

3,400

3,550

3,630

3,680

3,860

4,010

835

Dorset

3,070

3,170

3,430

3,570

3,640

3,660

3,860

3,970

845

East Sussex

3,320

3,410

3,700

3,880

4,000

4,010

4,240

4,340

850

Hampshire

3,150

3,220

3,470

3,670

3,760

3,780

3,980

4,070

855

Leicestershire

3,010

3,100

3,340

3,470

3,520

3,520

3,710

3,800

860

Staffordshire

3,020

3,110

3,360

3,500

3,560

3,590

3,780

3,910

865

Wiltshire

3,110

3,230

3,470

3,600

3,660

3,730

3,890

4,020

873

Cambridgeshire

3,110

3,220

3,450

3,570

3,660

3,750

3,970

4,090

875

Cheshire

3,040

3,130

3,370

3,500

3,560

3,640

3,840

3,990

878

Devon

3,210

3,300

3,520

3,640

3,710

3,710

3,910

4,040

881

Essex

3,300

3,390

3,650

3,840

3,920

3,970

4,190

4,270

885

Worcestershire

3,040

3,140

3,400

3,570

3,630

3,650

3,840

3,970

888

Lancashire

3,180

3,290

3,560

3,720

3,800

3,810

4,030

4,170

891

Nottinghamshire

3,080

3,180

3,450

3,560

3,630

3,670

3,850

3,970

893

Shropshire

3,110

3,200

3,450

3,610

3,710

3,810

3,990

4,090

908

Cornwall

3,240

3,340

3,590

3,730

3,810

3,770

3,960

4,090

909

Cumbria

3,160

3,270

3,550

3,730

3,810

3,830

4,020

4,170

916

Gloucestershire

3,080

3,210

3,470

3,590

3,650

3,710

3,880

4,010

919

Hertfordshire

3,330

3,420

3,680

3,860

3,940

3,910

4,120

4,170

925

Lincolnshire

3,180

3,300

3,550

3,710

3,790

3,840

4,040

4,160

926

Norfolk

3,190

3,300

3,560

3,730

3,820

3,820

4,040

4,150

928

Northamptonshire

3,140

3,260

3,490

3,630

3,700

3,790

3,980

4,110

929

Northumberland

3,170

3,270

3,590

3,820

3,890

3,870

4,070

4,250

931

Oxfordshire

3,230

3,330

3,610

3,790

3,880

3,930

4,130

4,220

933

Somerset

3,140

3,240

3,500

3,630

3,720

3,800

4,000

4,090

935

Suffolk

3,110

3,200

3,460

3,640

3,730

3,700

3,910

4,010

936

Surrey

3,300

3,380

3,610

3,800

3,880

3,900

4,080

4,230

937

Warwickshire

3,060

3,180

3,400

3,530

3,620

3,730

3,930

4,040

Notes:

1.Price Base: Real terms at 2003–04 prices, based on GDP deflators as at 23 March 2005.

2.Figures reflect relevant sub-blocks of education SSA/EFS settlements and exclude the pensions transfer to EFS.

3.Total funding also includes all revenue grants in DfES Departmental Expenditure Limits relevant to pupils aged three to 10 and 11 to 15 and exclude Education Maintenance Allowances and grants not allocated at LEA level. For those LEAs in receipt of advance of grant under the transitional support arrangements for 2004–05, advance grant funding is included in the year of payment (2004–05). There will be a consequential reduction in DfES grant for these LEAs in future years (either 2006–07 and 2007–08 or 2006–7 to 2008–9, depending on the terms on which the advance was given to the LEA).

4.The pupil numbers used to convert £ million figures to £ per pupil are those underlying the SSA/EFS settlement calculations plus PLASC three-year-old maintained pupils and estimated three to four-year-olds funded through state support in maintained and other educational institutions where these are not included in the SSA pupil numbers.

5.Rounding: Figures are rounded to the nearest 10.

6.Status: 2005–06 figures are provisional as some grants have not yet been finalised/audited.

School Meals

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to her Answer of 9 June 2005, Official Report, column 698W, on school meals, (a) when she expects to decide how best to capture information about schools meals provision and (b) what information about school meals provision is collected by (i) her Department and (ii) other Government departments. [7214]

Our intention is to send schools a questionnaire covering the relevant information about school meals provision before they break for the summer holidays.

The Department for Education and Skills collects information on eligibility and take-up of free school meals. Other Government departments do not collect information about school meals.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills when she expects the School Meals Review Panel to publish its draft school lunch standards for the school year starting in September. [8058]

The Department for Education and Skills will publish the draft version of the school lunch standards for public consultation this September, the final version will be mandatory by September 2006.

Schools (Sutton)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many children are attending schools in the London borough of Sutton in the 2004–05 academic year, broken down by (a) local authority and (b) (i) primary, (ii) secondary and (iii) special school. [7248]

The requested information is given in the table:

Maintained primary, secondary and all special schools: number (headcount) of pupils—as at January 2005 (provisional)—Sutton local education authority area, by local authority area -- Headcount of pupils(27)(28)

Special

Primary

Secondary

Maintained

Non-maintained

Total

Total

Sutton local authority

14,790

14,740

270

80

350

29,880

Epsom and Ewell local authority

260

1,220

n/a

n/a

n/a

1,480

Sutton local education authority

15,050

15,960

270

80

350

31,360

n/a=not applicable.

(27)Includes middle schools as deemed.

(28)Excludes dually registered pupils.

Note:

Pupil numbers nave been rounded to the neatest 10. There may be discrepancies between the sum of constituent items and totals as shown.

Source:

Annual Schools Census

Special Educational Needs

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the average time taken to statement a pupil in Lancashire education authority was in the last period for which figures are available. [6604]

The Department for Education and Skills does not hold data on the average time taken to issue a statement for pupils with special educational needs in local education authorities. Relevant data is however available from the Audit Commission. The LEA Best Value indicator BV 43b shows that 67.1 per cent. of draft statements of SEN in Lancashire were prepared within 18 weeks during 2003–04. If cases covered by the statutory exceptions to the time limits—as set out in the Education (Special Educational Needs) (England) (Consolidation) Regulations 2001, Section 12(7)—are excluded, 89.7 per cent. were prepared within the 18 week period (Indicator BV 43a).

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what steps will be taken to consult parents of children with special educational needs (SEN) in the national audit of SEN specialist services. [7299]

The national audit of low incidence special needs support, services and provision is currently under way. The questionnaires have been issued to all local authorities and responses are being received and followed up. Structured workshops have been established in each Region to discuss the questionnaire findings and add to the audit data collection. The workshop participants are from local authorities, health and social care as well as the non-maintained, private and voluntary sectors and include representatives from organisations such as the parent partnerships.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if she will make a statement on the implementation of the Special Educational Needs and Disability Rights Act 2001 in (a) hospitals and (b) primary care centres in respect of deaf people and people suffering from hearing impairment. [7377]

The remit of the Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001 does not cover hospitals or primary care trusts. The Act amended the Education Act 1996 to strengthen the right to a mainstream education for pupils with special educational needs where parents want it and where it is compatible with the efficient education of other children. It also amended Part 4 of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 to require local education authorities, schools, colleges, universities and providers of adult education not to discriminate against disabled people in their access to education for reasons relating to their disability and to require local education authorities and schools to plan to increase progressively, and overtime, access to schools by disabled pupils and prospective pupils.

Student Debt

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills

(1) what the total amount was of debt repaid by (a) UK and (b) EU students who graduated from English universities in each year since 1994; and what proportion of debt remains outstanding for each year; [8029]

(2) what the average proportion of student loan debt repaid by United Kingdom borrowers entering repayment status was in each financial year since 1999. [8030]

Borrowers with income-contingent loans repay 9 per cent. of income over £15,000. They may voluntarily pay more. Borrowers enter repayment status in the April after they have graduated, or otherwise left their course.

The table shows the amount repaid on UK publicly-owned student loans by financial year.

£ million

Financial year

Amount repaid

1994–95

27.4

1995–96

50.5

1996–97

86.1

1997–98

133.6

1998–99

134.5

1999–2000

131.2

2000–01

178.4

2001–02

266.8

2002–03

332.6

2003–04

413.0

Source:

Student Loans Company

Figures include repayments on both income-contingent and mortgage-style loans. Note that the figures are repayments posted during the financial year from all borrowers, regardless of when they entered repayment status or are due to enter repayment status. It would be misleading to show these repayments as a proportion of the total amount outstanding at the end of the year, as a significant part of the outstanding amount is loans that are not yet in repayment status. EU students are not eligible for maintenance loans in the UK. Figures are not available separately for UK students in English universities.

In general, repayments of income-contingent loans are collected through the tax system. Repayments are notified to the Student Loans Company (SLC) after the end of the tax year, after which SLC reconcile the repayments notified with their records. Therefore there will be some repayments that have been made but are not yet reflected in the figures.

The following table shows repayments of income-contingent loans, and amounts outstanding and repaid as a percentage of the total, for cohorts of borrowers. The table shows the position reported in June 2005; figures will change as further repayments are recorded for each cohort.

Year borrower entered

repayment status

(cohort)

Repayments

(£ million)

Percentage

of amount outstanding

Percentage of amount repaid

2000

24.3

86

14

2001

39.8

90

10

2002

121.6

92

8

2003

115.3

95

5

2004

83.5

97

3

Source:

Student Loans Company

The first cohort of income contingent borrowers entered repayment status in April 2000. The earnings of graduates are likely to rise in the years after leaving higher education, therefore the repayments of income-contingent loans will be lower in the early years. This is reflected in the table. Information in this format is not held centrally for mortgage-style borrowers.

Student Loans

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what legal powers are available to the Student Loans Company to obtain repayments of loans in respect of top-up fees from graduates from EU member states working outside the UK; what estimate she has made of the likely total value of such loans in each year; and if she will make a statement. [4830]

The Student Loans Company will have the power to recover loans which are not recoverable through income tax in the UK, as a debt through litigation in the courts, if there is a breach of the terms. We anticipate relying on European Council regulation 44/2001 in support of this.

We estimate that the annual resource cost of fee loans issued to EU students who would work outside the UK on graduation could be around £25 million1 (steady state at 2006/07 terms). This assumes that 91 per cent. of EU students are charged the full £3,000 fee, 9 per cent. charged £2,000, 80 per cent. of them take out a fee loan and around 75 per cent. of EU students work outside the UK after graduation. The latter assumption has been derived from data on the first destination of EU students on graduation. These data indicate that a large proportion of EU students do not go into work on graduation, the majority of these undertaking further study. In the absence of any data about the eventual employment of this group of students, we have assumed that they all enter employment outside the UK and hence, the £25 million figure could be an over-estimate.

The estimate presented here is in resource terms. This is the resource cost to the Department of loans—specifically of providing an interest subsidy and of writing-off some loans. It is on a different basis to (Commons Written) PQ 3057, which concerned the cost to the Department of issuing loans for fees to all EU students, not just those who move outside the UK after graduation, and uses an updated discount rate to calculate resource costs2 .

1 Figure rounded to the nearest £5 million.

2 Resource cost estimates updated using latest 2.2 per cent. discount rate.

Teacher Recruitment

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the targets for recruitment to (a) science, (b) mathematics and (c) modern foreign languages teacher training courses were in each year between 1994 and 2004; and what the performance against those targets was in each year. [7393]

The number of places allocated and the number of people recruited to science, mathematics and modern foreign languages in England from 1994 to 2004 are given in tables 1, 2 and 3.

Table 1: Science

Places

Recruitment

Difference

1993/94

2,615

2,397

218

1994/95

3,200

2,918

282

1995/96

3,402

2,794

608

1996/97

3,700

2,937

763

1997/98

3,300

2,789

511

1998/99

3,050

2,279

771

1999/2000

2,390

2,362

28

2000/01

2,690

2,413

277

2001/02

2,810

2,594

216

2002/03

2,850

2,701

149

2003/04

3,225

2,871

354

Table 2: Mathematics

Places

Recruitment

Difference

1993/94

1,755

1,790

-35

1994/95

2,230

1,950

280

1995/96

2,267

1,795

472

1996/97

2,550

1,653

897

1997/98

2,250

1,464

786

1998/99

2,150

1,120

1,030

1999/2000

1,680

1,302

378

2000/01

1,850

1,290

560

2001/02

1,940

1,553

387

2002/03

1,940

1,674

266

2003/04

2,315

1,942

373

Table 3: Modern foreign languages

Places

Recruitment

Difference

1993/94

1,665

1,550

115

1994/95

2,060

1,789

271

1995/96

2,092

1,790

302

1996/97

2,250

1,720

530

1997/98

2,650

1,799

851

1998/99

2,300

1,657

643

1999/2000

2,200

1,469

731

2000/01

2,050

1,635

415

2001/02

2,050

1,705

345

2002/03

2,050

1,732

318

2003/04

2,050

1,819

231

The number of places allocated and the number of people recruited do not take into account the Fast Track scheme or employment-based routes into teaching.

University Students (Counselling)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what changes to provision of counselling services for university students has been made to meet the changes in demand arising from broadening access. [7500]

Provision of Counselling Services is a matter for individual higher education institutions. Counselling Services in UK universities have responded positively to the changes in student populations resulting from the HE Widening Participation agenda. The Government have supported a number of initiatives to improve all core support services to students, such as the Developing Modern Higher Education Careers Services", report in 2001. A key focus of Developing Modern Higher Education Careers Services" was the need to ensure greater and more targeted access to those students and graduates who might be disadvantaged and/or in need of support. The follow-up report Modernising HE Careers Education—a framework for good practice" showed that universities had reviewed their provision of support services, and recognised the need to improve their standards of service.