Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 435: debated on Thursday 30 June 2005

Written Answers to Questions

Thursday 30 June 2005

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Bovine TB

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many cattle have been infected with bovine TB in each of the last three years in (a) Devon, (b) Cornwall, (c) Somerset and (d) Dorset; and how many cattle were destroyed during the foot and mouth epidemic in each county. [5964]

holding answer 21 June 2005

If an animal reacts positively to the skin test it is generally considered to have bovine TB. However, it is not always possible to confirm infection in any particular animal by post-mortem examination at the slaughterhouse, or by culturingMycobacterium bovis in the laboratory. This is because in the early stages of the disease, it is not always possible to see lesions with the naked eye, and, due to the fastidious nature of the organism, it is not possible to culture from samples in every case.

Therefore, the number of cattle slaughtered under bovine TB control measures in the four counties requested in the last three years is provided as follows:

2002

2003

2004

Devon

3,022

3,657

4,674

Cornwall

2,917

2,414

2,351

Somerset

9,07

1,033

928

Dorset

3,83

399

408

The number of cattle destroyed as a result of foot and mouth in each of the counties is as follows:

Devon

3,267

Cornwall

3,310

Somerset

992

Dorset

445

Notes:

1.The number of cattle slaughtered under bovine TB control measures comprises the number of reactors to the TB test and those cattle that have been in direct contact.

2.TB data downloaded from the State Veterinary Service database on 19 May 2005.

3.All data are provisional and subject to change as more data become available.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many farms in the South West have been affected by bovine TB in each of the last three years; how many cattle in England have been slaughtered due to bovine TB in each year; how much was paid by the Government to farmers in (a) Devon, (b) Cornwall, (c) Somerset and (d) Dorset in compensation for bovine TB in each of the last three years; what steps she has taken to eradicate TB in cattle; and what steps she is proposing to take. [6264]

holding answer 22 June 2005

The information requested is as follows:

Number of farms affected by TB and the cattle slaughtered

The number of holdings affected by bovine TB breakdowns in each of the last three years, as well as the number of cattle slaughtered under TB control measures in England between 2001 and 2004 are detailed in the following tables.

Table 1: Number of holdings affected by TB incident by county

Number of farm holdings Number of herds under movement restrictions(22)

County

2002

2003

2004

2002

2003

2004

Devon

630

856

915

648

912

981

Cornwall

540

619

589

560

680

638

Somerset

203

279

253

213

294

262

Dorset

102

131

107

105

140

115

(22)Data downloaded from the State Veterinary Service database on 22 June 2005. All data provisional and subject to change as more data become available.

Table 2: Cattle slaughtered in England

Year(23)

Cattle slaughtered(24)

2001(25)

4,284

2002(25)

17,851

2003

17,096

2004

16,955

(23)TB Reactors plus Direct Contacts

(24)Data downloaded from State Veterinary Service database on 19 May 2005. All data provisional and subject to change as more data become available.

(25)In 2001, the TB testing and control programme was largely suspended due to the foot and mouth Disease (FMD) outbreak. When testing resumed in 2002, resources were concentrated on herds with overdue TB tests which would have had a longer period in which to contract the disease. Also the proportion of high risk herds tested immediately after the FMD outbreak was greater than that prior to the outbreak. As a result, data for 2001 and 2002 are not comparable with other years.

Compensation

The amount of compensation for Bovine TB paid to farmers in the four counties is not collected/available in the format requested, and can be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

The amount of compensation paid in Great Britain over the last three years is detailed in the following table.

Table 3: Compensation paid in Great Britain -- £ million

Financial year

Expenditure

2001–02

9.2

2002–03

31.9

2003–04

34.4

2004–05

35.0(26)

(26)Forecast.

Action to control TB

The Government are committed to finding the best way to combat bovine TB, backed by available scientific evidence and taking account of all interested parties, including the taxpayer. We published our 10-year strategy for the control of bovine TB in March. This places emphasis on keeping clean areas clean and achieving a sustained and steady reduction of TB in hotspot areas. Specific disease control policies will be tailored to reflect the control of bovine TB in March. This places emphasis on keeping clean areas clean and achieving a sustained and steady reduction of TB in hotspot areas. Specific disease control policies will be tailored to reflect the regional variation in disease and risk, and adjusted to make best use of emerging scientific findings.

We are prepared to cull badgers to control bovine TB if evidence shows it is cost-effective, practicable and sustainable. The strategic framework sets out a process for decision-making on badger culling. However, vaccination for cattle or badgers is still a long-term goal and we have recently approved the first field trial of a TB vaccine for badgers and a new study by the Veterinary Laboratories Agency to prepare for similar field trials in cattle.

British Waterways (Surplus Land)

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps she has taken to ensure that British Waterways make available surplus land at less than market value for development of affordable housing. [7136]

The Department looks to British Waterways to provide affordable housing in its developments as part of its commitment to corporate social responsibility. The amount is determined by local planning requirements and individual circumstances. As at 31 March 2005, 1,998 units of social housing are planned to be built on BW development sites.

Consultants

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what plans she has to issue guidance on effective commissioning for those in the public and voluntary sectors who are commissioning work from external consultants. [7021]

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, my hon. Friend the Member for Wentworth (John Healey) on 28 June 2005, Official Report, column 1286W.

Departmental Relocation

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many of her Department's posts (a) have been relocated and (b) are under consideration for relocation from London to the deprived areas of the South East. [6255]

The Department is implementing the Lyons Review recommendations to relocate 390 posts out of London and the South East by 2010. This will not exclude consideration of relocating some posts to relatively deprived areas in the South East. So far, the Department has not identified any posts suitable for transfer to deprived areas in the South East.

Emissions Trading Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will estimate the level of penalties that will have been collected after year one of the EU emissions trading scheme. [8608]

All operators of installations that do not surrender sufficient allowances to cover their annual emissions will be liable to a penalty. In the first phase of the scheme (2005–07), the penalty will be €40 for each tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent emitted by that installation for which the operator has not surrendered allowances. The penalty will rise to €100 per tonne for the second phase. The extent of the penalties for year one of the scheme will only be known after 20 April 2006, once reconciliation has taken place. We expect all installations will comply with the regulations.

Fish Merchants (Buyer's Licences)

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs under what circumstances a buyer's licence can be withdrawn from a UK fish merchant. [8557]

Under the terms of the Registration of Fish Buyers and Sellers and Designation of Fish Auction Sites Regulations 2005, the Secretary of State may suspend the registration of a buyer where the registered buyer has not:

complied with a condition of registration; or

conducted his business in a manner that complies with the requirements of Article 9 of Council Regulation 2847/93 (the Control Regulation), Article 22 of Council Regulation 2371/2002 (the Common Fisheries Policy) in regard to the submission of sales notes.

In addition, a court may revoke the registration of a buyer either totally or for a specified period upon conviction for the following offences:

where a person knowingly or recklessly makes a false statement for the purposes of an application for registration;

where a registered fish buyer fails to comply with a condition of his registration;

where a registered fish buyer fails to keep, or to produce on request by a British sea fishery officer, the necessary sales records.

Fly Tipping

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many reported incidents of fly-tipping there were in each (a) local authority and (b) region in the last period for which figures are available; and what costs were incurred in removing fly-tipped waste. [7217]

The number of reported incidents of fly-tipping and the cost of clearance and disposal reported between April 2004 and March 2005 are given by(a) waste collection authority and (b) region in tables made available in the Library of the House.

These data are from the Flycapture database, which records fly-tipping incidents dealt with by waste collection authorities and the Environment Agency. The figures are likely to be an underestimate and should increase as authorities improve their data collection and reporting performance.

Gangmasters

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when she expects the Gangmasters Licensing Authority to commence operation. [7176]

The Gangmasters Licensing Authority commenced operation on 1 April 2005. One of the Authority's first tasks will be to establish the conditions to be attached to a licence and the operational aspects of the licensing scheme. These will be set out in rules orders and the Authority will be consulting on these as a matter of urgency.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what plans she has to extend the provisions of the Gangmasters (Licensing) Act 2004 to other sectors and industries. [7177]

The Gangmasters (Licensing) Act 2004 applies to gangmasters operating in the agricultural, shellfish gathering and associated food/fish processing and packaging sectors. I have no plans to extend the scope of the Act to other sectors and industries.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what her latest assessment is of the number of (a) legally operational and (b) illegal gangmaster organisations in the UK. [7178]

Based on a DEFRA commissioned study, the Gangmasters Licensing Authority (GLA) expects to issue 1,000 licences to gangmaster organisations operating legitimately in the agricultural, shellfish gathering and associated food and fish processing and packaging sectors in the UK. The GLA anticipates inviting licence applications from spring 2006.

By its very nature, it is very difficult to quantify illegal gangmaster activity. Once the licensing scheme is operational, the GLA's compliance role and enforcement activities undertaken on behalf of DEFRA will generate more accurate data on the numbers of gangmasters engaged in illegal business practices.

Landfill Sites

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many (a) complaints, (b) court actions and (c) fines against landfill sites for problems related to (i) odours, (ii) water pollutions, (iii) air pollution and (iv) human health impact there were in each year since May 1997, broken down by region. [4603]

I refer the hon. Member to the answergiven on 7 September 2004, Official Report, column 944W which outline the limitations when producing this data. The following sets of data update the figures previously provided.

Complaints

Tables 1, 2 and 3 give information of incidents that were reported to the Environment Agency and were recorded on the National Incident Recording System (NIRS). It is important to note that NIRS records incidents and not complaints.

Table 1: Incidents where the pollutant was recorded as landfill odour (categories 1–3)

Region

July 2004 to April 2005

Anglian

51

Midlands

32

North East

42

North West

55

Southern

29

South West

29

Thames

55

EA Wales

50

Table 2: Incidents which had impact to water (categories 1–3)

Region

July 2004 to April 2005

Anglian

1

Midlands

4

North East

9

North West

2

Southern

2

South west

5

Thames

2

EA Wales

3

Table 3: Incidents which had impact to air (categories 1–3)

Region

July 2004 to April 2005

Anglian

45

Midlands

42

North East

58

North West

81

Southern

21

South West

21

Thames

57

EA Wales

24

The NIRS system has no designated means of recording incidents in terms of their impact on human health. Specific and accurate data concerning complaints against landfill sites for problems related to human health can not therefore be derived from NIRS.

Court actions and fines

Information concerning 1 July 2004 and 31 May 2004.(b) court actions and (c) fines are kept separately, on the National Enforcement Database. The following prosecutions were taken between

Updated figures 1 July 2004 to 31 May 2005 -- WRA 1991 s.85(1)

Cases

Fines

Anglian

Midlands

NE

NW

Southern

SW

1

1

Thames

Wales

EPA 1990 s.33(1)(c)

Cases

Fines

Anglian

Midlands

2

2

NE

NW

Southern

SW

Thames

Wales

EPA 1990 s.33(6)

Cases

Fines

Anglian

Midlands

2

2

NE

NW

1

1

Southern

SW

Thames

Wales

Llancloudy

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will instruct her officials to meet the hon. Member for Hereford and residents and landowners in Llancloudy in Hereford constituency before a decision is made on the route for lorries from the farm in Llancloudy to the main road; and if she will make a statement. [5672]

holding answer 20 June 2005

The hon. Member should be aware that there is ongoing litigation between the current owners and occupiers Mrs. Georgina Hawkins and Mr. Kevin Feakins and the Rural Payments Agency and Defra in connection with (1) sums owed by Mr. Feakins to the RPA in respect of the sheep meat clawback scheme; and (2) Defra's activities on the farm during the 2001 foot and mouth disease outbreak.

My officials are fully aware of the concerns of local residents and they have been in correspondence with the Llancloudy Residents Association over the proposals for the removal of farmyard manure and other seized materials from Hill Farm Llancloudy. The current situation is that Defra has agreed to remove these seized materials and to reinstate the land. However, in order to fulfil this undertaking the Department needs to agree a licence with Mr. Feakins and Mrs. Hawkins, as the owners and occupiers of the land, in order to gain access to the land. This licence will also include detailed method statements for the operations required. Defra's preferred access route is along the main farm access drive, a route which would minimise the impact on the majority of Llancloudy residents—this route has not been agreed by Mr. Feakins and Mrs. Hawkins.

Given the failure to agree access routes, my officials do not believe that an on-site meeting would be helpful, since until the exact access route is agreed, contractors cannot prepare the detailed working protocols and risk assessments that will be required and officials would not be able to address the concerns of residents. However given the understandable concerns of residents, my officials would be pleased to meet with the hon. Member in London, together with a representative of the Llancloudy Residents Association in London to explain the current situation and to outline the steps the Department has taken to agree access and will take to ensure that the impact on residents will be minimised.

Munitions/Fireworks Production

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what research she has commissioned on the duration of damage to (a) soil and (b) ground water on land that was used for (i) munitions production and (ii) fireworks production; and if she will make a statement. [6360]

The Environment Agency has published two documents regarding the potential for contamination of land at former explosives manufacturing sites (including fireworks). Both deal with the characteristics of the potential contaminants at such sites. This includes their solubility and biodegradability which can be used to indicate the likelihood of them persisting at the site and the methods required to investigate and remediate such contamination.

These reports are:

R&D Technical Report P5–042/TR/03—Land Contamination: Technical Guidance on Special Sites: Explosives Manufacturing & Processing Sites.

Project Record P5–036/01—Collation of Toxicological Data and Development of Guideline Values for Explosive Substances, Collation of Physicochemical data.

This second document is the first step in the production of Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment (CLEA) Soil Guideline Values.

The agency has also produced general guidance on the assessment of natural attenuation (the dispersion or breakdown) of contaminants in groundwater:

R&D Publication 95—Guidance on the Assessment and Monitoring of Natural Attenuation of Contaminants in Groundwater.

Defra has two publications in its Industry Profiles" series on munitions and firework production. This series provides information on the processes, materials and waste associated with individual industries, with respect to land contamination:

Chemical Works: explosives, propellents and pyrotechnics manufacturing works;

Engineering Works: mechanical engineering and ordnance works.

Rats

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate she has made of the rat population of England and Wales in (a) 1997 and (b) 2005. [7153]

The most recent estimate of the Norway rat population in England was a minimum of 5,240,000 individuals. This figure was established by a review that assessed the population and conservation status of all British mammals, published in 1995. The only recent objective national survey of rat presence is within the English House Condition Survey (EHCS). The 1996 survey revealed that 0.23 per cent. of properties had rats indoors and 1.6 per cent. had rats present outside. A report on the rodent element of the 2001 EHCS will be published this summer.

Rural Housing Commission

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the (a) timetable for the establishment, (b) remit and (c) membership will be of the proposed Rural Housing Commission. [7397]

This is a high priority for the Government. I am working closely with Ministerial colleagues to take this plan forward and hope to make an announcement shortly.

Single Payment System

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what criteria will be used in deciding whether to undertake a Single Payment System inspection. [6826]

The criteria for selection for inspection depends on whether the inspection relates to scheme eligibility or to cross-compliance. Where inspections relate to eligibility criteria, the relevant regulation requires that member states must make a random selection from the population of applicants, and a risk-based selection to highlight cases of irregularity. The latter must take account of:

the amount of aid involved;

the number of agricultural parcels and the area for which aid is requested;

changes from the previous year;

the findings of checks made in past years;

for farmers who had no hectares in the single payment Scheme reference period, compliance with the condition that at least 50 per cent. of the agricultural activity maintained in the reference period expressed in livestock units has been maintained; and

other factors to be defined by the member states.

Where inspections relate to cross-compliance conditions, the relevant regulation requires that member states select all inspections on the basis of a risk analysis appropriate to the cross compliance requirements and standards or to the existing legislation.

Tyres

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many tyres were (a) purchased, (b) reused and (c) disposed of by (i) landfill, (ii) incineration, (iii) illegal fly-tipping and (iv) other means in each year since 2001. [4527]

Figures from tyre manufacturers and importers show replacement tyre sales of around 28 million car and truck units in 2003. It is estimated a further 15 million units were introduced on newly registered vehicles.

The information requested, is set out in the following table, and is based on information supplied to the Used Tyre Working Group (UTWG). Figures from the UTWG can be found on www.tyredisposal.co.uk. Full 2004 figures are not yet available.

2001

2002

2003

Used tyre arisings (tonnes)

481,000

447,000

444,000

Re-use

118,000

105,000

105,000

Materials recovery

107,000

105,000

160,000

Energy recovery

40,000

48,000

78,000

Engineering uses

16,000

29,000

15,000

Exports

10,000

13,000

13,000

Landfill

144,000

99,000

85,000

Other

47,000

47,000

-7,000

The ban on the landfill of whole tyres at all existing hazardous waste landfill sites and all new landfill sites on 16 July 2003 passed without significant effect on tyre collection or recovery capacity. The next key date will be 16 July 2006 when shredded tyres will be banned from landfilling. Whole tyres can continue to be used for landfill engineering for both hazardous and non-hazardous landfills. The numbers of tyres disposed to landfill is reducing, and 2004 returns from members of the Tyre Recovery Association, which represents tyre collectors and reprocessors and accounts for a significant proportion of overall used tyre activity, indicate that landfill disposal reduced sharply in 2004.

There are no figures kept on the number of tyres that are flytipped.

Waste Recycling

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many recycling centres there are in each London borough. [7218]

The number of recycling centres in each London borough is shown in the table.

Number

Barking and Dagenham

60

Barnet

75

Bexley

84

Brent

113

Bromley

50

Camden

153

Corporation of London

14

Croydon

35

Ealing

55

Enfield

350

Greenwich

66

Hackney

73

Hammersmith and Fulham

85

Haringey

170

Harrow

38

Havering

24

Hillingdon

70

Hounslow

52

Islington

157

Kensington and Chelsea

233

Kingston-upon-Thames

32

Lambeth

20

Lewisham

48

Merton

29

Newham

126

Redbridge

69

Richmond upon Thames

123

Southwark

252

Sutton

197

Tower Hamlets

320

Waltham Forest

231

Wandsworth

430

Westminster

221

Total

4,055

White-tailed Sea Eagle

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on plans to release white tailed sea eagles in the UK; and what assessment has been made of the likely impact of their releases on (a) other wildlife and (b) livestock. [7279]

Plans to release white-tailed eagles in the UK English Nature is considering plans to reintroduce white-tailed eagles for the following reasons:

The white-tailed eagle is a red listed bird of conservation concern in the UK and has unfavourable conservation status in Europe.

Much needs to be done to restore it to its former global status, including conservation action in the UK

White-tailed eagles are still absent from much of their former range which encompassed all of Europe including the length of Britain, wherever there was suitable habitat, particularly coastal and freshwater wetlands.

Conservation management applied to other species of raptors has demonstrated that population increase and range expansion can be achieved most rapidly by active intervention.

What assessment has been made of the likely impact of their releases on(a) other wildlife and (b) livestock.

The species is considered to be a potentially suitable candidate for a reintroduction programme. However unless a detailed feasibility study demonstrates the likely success of any proposed reintroduction then it will not take place. The feasibility study must include an assessment against IUCN (The World Conservation Union) criteria for species reintroductions.

Plans are at such an early stage that no feasibility study has been completed. This study will need to consider a range of biological and social-economic requirements, including the impact on other wildlife and livestock. Note the following extracts from the IUCN reintroduction criteria:

The species, if any, that has filled the void created by the loss of the species concerned, should be determined; an understanding of the effect the re-introduced species will have on the ecosystem is important for ascertaining the success of the re-introduced population.

Socio-economic studies should be made to assess impacts, costs and benefits of the re-introduction programme to local human populations.

Deputy Prime Minister

Casinos

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister

(1) when he intends to implement a change in the use class of casinos; and if he will make a statement; [6969]

(2) what consultation his Department has undertaken since 1 November 2004 on the use class of casinos; which organisations were consulted; on what dates that consultation occurred; and if he will make a statement. [6970]

On 1 November 2004, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport announced that the Government were minded to make a change in the Use Classes Order in respect of casinos.

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister commissioned consultants to look into the case for changes to the Use Classes Order and the implications of such a change. We are considering the consultants report. No change will be made without full public consultation.

Computer Crime

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many cases of computer (a) hacking, (b) fraud and (c) theft his Department recorded in each year since 2001–02; and for each year, on how many occasions computer systems have been illegally accessed by computer hackers (i) within and (ii) outside his Department. [7182]

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister was established on 29 May 2002. For ODPM-owned systems instances of hacking, fraud, theft and illegal access recorded in each complete year since that date are as follows:

Hacking

Fraud

Theft

Illegal access

2002–03

0

0

2

0

2003–04

0

0

2

0

2004–05

0

0

2

0

Employees (Assaults)

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what estimate he has made of the number of local authority employees who have been assaulted at work in each London borough in each year since 1997. [7468]

The information requested is not held centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.

EU Funding (West Midlands)

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether appraisals of priority projects on the reserve list for Objective 2 funding in the West Midlands are continuing following the extraordinary meeting of the West Midlands Objective 2 Programme Monitoring Committee held on 18 May. [7719]

holding answer 28 June 2005

At the Extraordinary meeting of the West Midlands Objective 2 Programme Monitoring Committee on 18 May it was agreed that:

The appraisal of priority projects on the reserve list requiring Advantage West Midlands (the Regional Development Agency) match funding is suspended until a full application is submitted to and accepted by AWM. These projects will then be subject to a joint appraisal approach.

Programme resource will not be committed to priority projects on the reserve list until the MG Rover package of projects has been approved and then subject to resource availability, the confirmation of all match funding and necessary planning approvals being in place.

The Programme Monitoring Committee will monitor the situation, on the basis of progress reports supplied by the European secretariat in the Government Office for the West Midlands.

Fire Brigade

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the average response time was to an emergency call to the fire brigade in each London borough in each year since 1997. [7473]

The available information has been supplied by the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority (LFEPA). This shows the average response time for emergency calls in each London borough averaged over the period April 1999-September 2003.

Average time for first appliance to arrive at an incident

Borough

Minutes and seconds

Barking and Dagenham

6:13

Barnet

6:28

Bexley

6:22

Brent

5:56

Bromley

6:36

Camden

4:43

City

4:38

Croydon

5:59

Baling

5:45

Enfield

6:31

Greenwich

5:31

Hackney

4:59

Hammersmith and Fulham

5:10

Haringey

5:51

Harrow

6:37

Havering

6:47

Hillingdon

6:39

Hounslow

6:37

Islington

4:59

Kensington and Chelsea

4:49

Kingston upon Thames

6:13

Lambeth

5:07

Lewisham

5:00

Merton

5:53

Newham

5:33

Redbridge

6:03

Richmond upon Thames

6:38

Southwark

4:57

Sutton

6:25

Tower Hamlets

4:31

Waltham Forest

5:29

Wandsworth

5:30

Westminster

4:47

Source:

LFEPA Incident Recording Information System (IRIS) Aril 1999 to September 2003

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many fire crews have trained for Lancashire fire brigade in each of the last three years; and how many are on the waiting list for training. [7655]

This is a matter for the local fire and rescue service. The information requested is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Housing

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister when he expects the licensing scheme for houses in multiple occupation to come into force; and when he expects to announce his decisions on the outcome of the consultation on licensing in the private sector. [8648]

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is proposing that the licensing scheme for Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) comes into force in October 2005.

Decisions on the key issues arising from the consultation exercise on HMO licensing were announced by my right hon. Friend, the former Minister for Housing and Planning on 6 April. Decisions on the remaining issues will be announced before the summer recess.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many, and what proportion of, (a) privately rented and (b) privately owned homes in each English region do not meet the Decent Homes Standard; and what steps his Department is taking to improve these homes. [7143]

The English House Condition Survey 2001: Regional Report (ODPM, 2003) includes details of the numbers of private sector homes that did not meet the decent homes standard in 2001. Separate data are not available for privately rented and privately owned homes. The report is available on the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister website.

We are fully committed to improving the quality of private sector housing stock by encouraging, through financial support and guidance, the development of innovative housing renewal policies by local authorities through the powers made available to them by the Regulatory Reform Order (Housing Assistance) (England and Wales) Order 2002. The Housing Act 2004 contains measures to tackle private sector non-decency through the implementation of the new housing health and safety ratings system, and licensing on homes in multiple occupancy.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the total expenditure on the Starter Homes Initiative was; and how many people were helped to buy a home in each year of its operation. [7173]

The total expenditure on the Starter Home Initiative was the original budget of £250 million, plus £53 million of extra funding from the ADP in March 2004 to help those key workers whose purchases were in the pipeline when SHI finished.

The numbers of key workers who were helped to buy a home in each year of operation:

Number

2001–02

107

2002–03

2,616

2003–04

5,998

2004–05

1,295

There were also 306 cases where a second key worker was assisted in the same household.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the total expenditure on the Key Worker Living scheme has been in each year since its inception; how many key workers have benefited from the scheme in each year; and what resources have been allocated to the scheme for future years. [7174]

Key Worker Living (KWL) began in April 2004. In 2004–05 expenditure was £265 million and 4,015 key workers benefited from the scheme. £374 million has been allocated for 2005–06 which has so far helped another 930 key workers since April 2005 and £86 million is allocated for 2006–07. The KWL target is to help 16,348 key workers by March 7. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is currently awaiting recommendations from regional housing boards on future funding levels for key workers.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many homes available for rent through (a) Birmingham city council and (b) registered social landlords in Birmingham have been (i) demolished and (ii) built in each of the last 10 years. [6104]

The information is as follows.

Birmingham city council Registered social landlords(27)

Demolitions(28)

New Build/Acquisition(29)

New Build

1996–97

(30)

32

573

1997–98

(30)

32

849

1998–99

(30)

43

814

1999–2000

(30)

58

497

2000–01

694

16

481

2001–02

1,239

36

455

2002–03

1,310

70

532

2003–04

857

14

788

2004–05(31)

1,337

(30)

(30)

(27)RSL new build completions data taken from Birmingham city council website Development in Birmingham 2003–04".

(28)Local authority demolitions data taken from city council's business plan statistical appendix—ODPM database.

(29)New build/acquisition local authority data provided by Birmingham city council housing department

(30)No data

(31)2004–05 demolition data taken from the draft HRA business plan, and is the planned demolitions figure, not outturn

The Housing Corporation, the funding and regulatory body for registered social landlords (RSLs) sponsored by the Office for the Deputy Prime Minister, only collects demolition data on a national level and therefore it is not possible to provide the information requested for RSL demolitions in the Birmingham area.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what eligibility criteria will be used to determine access to the Homebuy Joint Shared Equity Loans with Mortgage Lenders scheme. [6455]

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is currently consulting on the details of our proposals for a range of new HomeBuy products, as set out in the consultation document 'HomeBuy—Expanding the Opportunity to Own' (a copy of which is available from the Library of the House).

Under our proposals the eligibility criteria for the public/private funded equity loans variant of HomeBuy will remain the same as under our proposals for Open Market HomeBuy. We will receive advice for Regional Housing Boards on eligibility. Subject to the outcome of the consultation exercise the programme will, as at present, be focussed on assisting key public sector workers such as teachers, nurses and police officers. Some social tenants and those on housing registers (iethose waiting for a council or housing association home to rent) may also be eligible.

Laptop Computers

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many laptop computers have been used by (a) Ministers, (b) special advisers and (c) officials in his Department in each year since 1995; how many have been (i) lost and (ii) stolen in that period; what the cost was of the use of laptops in that period; and if he will make a statement. [4122]

The number of laptop computers used by Ministers and special advisers since the creation of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister on 29 May 2002 is as follows:

Number

Ministers

Special advisers

2002

2

2

2003

2

2

2004

2

2

2005

2

2

The information requested on the use of laptop computers by officials, and associated costs, in each year since that date is not available centrally in the form requested, and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Departmental records show the following numbers of lost or stolen laptop computers across the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister since 29 May 2002:

Lost Stolen

Ministers

Special advisers

Officials

Ministers

Special advisers

Officials

2002–03

2

2003–04

2

2004–05

2

2005–06

2

1(32)

(32)Recovered

Letting Schemes

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many choice-based lettings schemes have been established by local authorities in England since 2001, broken down by region. [7270]

The following table shows the number of local authorities which indicated that they operate a choice-based lettings scheme as at April 2004. As some authorities are jointly involved in the same choice-based lettings scheme, the figures more accurately represent the number of local authorities which have adopted a choice based lettings approach rather than the number of choice-based lettings schemes in operation.

Number of local authorities involved in a choice-based letting scheme as at April 2004

North East

2

North West

17

Yorkshire and the Humber

5

East Midlands

7

West Midlands

7

East of England

7

London

18

South East

7

South West

8

England

78

Source:

ODPM's Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix

Information on choice based letting schemes has been collected since 2002; only the latest figures are shown as previous year's data are not thought to be reliable.

Local Area Agreements

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what plans the Government have to extend local area agreements to lower-tier authorities. [7438]

Lower-tier authorities are already included in Local Area Agreements (LAAs) in two-tier areas. Whilst county councils lead the development of LAAs, they must work closely with lower-tier authorities in their areas in doing so. Precisely how this engagement takes place is down to local arrangements.

Local Government Finance

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will place in the Library a copy of the questionnaire sent to local authorities by his Department on the impact of implementing different variations of local government finance reform. [5589]

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has made available in the Library of the House copies of a questionnaire issued to a small selection of local authorities about possible practical and timing issues for Local Authorities and IT suppliers related to council tax revaluation in England. We have also provided a summary of the responses which have been submitted to Lyons.

As the questionnaire makes clear, the list of reform scenarios it contains was a way of exploring some of the technical parameters relating to practical implementation of council tax revaluation. It should not be taken in any sense as an indication of likely reform options.

Lyons Review

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many full-time equivalent employees are employed in relation to the Lyons Review. [4269]

The Lyons Inquiry team comprises 11.9full-time equivalent employees. The efficiency and relocation team, in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, works on both the implications for the Office of the Lyons relocation review as well as the Gershon review. The team has three full-time members of staff and they spend about a third of their time specifically on Lyons relocation review-related work. Other members of staff across the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, including in the regional development group, and in our non-departmental public bodies and executive agencies undertake specific work as necessary.

New Homes

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many new homes have been built by each local housing authority that has opted for (a) large scale voluntary transfer, (b) arm's length management organisation and (c) private finance initiative in each year since it did so. [6813]

Most local housing authorities have not built any dwellings following large scale voluntary transfer, except those tabled as follows. Most social housing provision will have been through registered social landlords. Local housing authorities opting for arm length management organisation have reported no subsequent local authority house building. Local authorities with signed Housing Revenue Account private finance initiatives contracts have not reported any subsequent local authority house building.

Local authorities reporting 'local authority' house building following large scale voluntary transfer (dwellings/year)

Number

Chiltern

1989–90

25

Cotswold(33)

1997–98

17

1998–99

17

2000–01

20

2002–03

4

2003–04

10

East Lindsey

1999–2000

1

Hambleton

1996–97

16

Hertsmere

1998–99

1

Kennet

1999–2000

11

2003–04

5

Mid Sussex

1991–92

32

Ryedale

1995–96

4

Sevenoaks(33)

1989–90

102

1990–91

18

1991–92

18

1992–93

6

South Shropshire

1994–95

6

Vale of White Horse

1995–96

9

(33)Numbers may include some registered social landlord dwellings due to misclassification.

Pensioner Home Improvements

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whatsteps he has taken to ensure that local authorities adopt appropriate practices for delivering home improvements for pensioners to meet their community safety objectives; and what discussions his Department has had with the Home Office on this subject. [7191]

Under the Regulatory Reform (Housing Assistance)(England and Wales) Order 2002 local authorities were given wide ranging new powers to provide financial assistance to home-owners and others to improve living accommodation. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's circular 05/2003 advised local authorities on how they could be used to align housing renewal policies with wider strategic objectives such as the reduction of crime and antisocial behaviour.

Section 17 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 places a duty on named agencies to do all they can to reasonably prevent crime and disorder in their area. The decisions and activities of local bodies and organisations can have an important impact on levels of crime and disorder in communities. In recognition of this, section17 aims to place crime and disorder reduction at the heart of local decision-making and to give it a focus across the wide range of local services that influence and impact on community safety.

Ministers and official in ODPM are in constant touch with colleagues in the Home Office to discuss these important strategic issues and how effective policies can best be delivered.

Regional Fire Control Centres

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how much his Department has spent on (a) consultancy and (b) other fees relating to the proposed regional fire control centres. [4936]

The FiReControl project commenced in January 2004. To the end of May 2005, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has spent £10,385,447 on consultancy and £2,524,472 on other fees related to the project. Some of these costs relating to building design are eligible to be reclaimed from selected accommodation developers.

Reviews (Funding)

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will publish the budget for the conduct of (a) the Lyons Review and (b) the Balance of Funding Review. [4241]

The Lyons Inquiry spent £239,565 in 2004–05 and has an estimated spend of £731,400 for 2005–06. The team working in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister on the implications of the Lyon's relocation review and the Gershon efficiency review is projected to cost £110,785 in 2005–06. About £37,000 of this can be attributed to Lyon's relocation review-related work.

For the Balance of Funding Review £118,789 was spent on externally commissioned research. The net cost of producing the report was about £1,000 taking account of sales. Other, administrative costs were not separately identified.

Thames Gateway Flood Risk Assessment

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will make it his policy to delay the need for developers to provide a flood risk assessment for each new development until the Thames gateway flood risk assessment is available. [7077]

In line with planning policy guidance note (PPG) 25, those proposing developments in flood risk areas should carry out a flood risk assessment appropriate to the location, scale and nature of the development and should submit this with the application.

The strategic flood risk assessment currently being undertaken by the Thames Gateway South Essex Partnership will provide information allowing local authorities in the area to work together to develop land use allocation strategies for managing flood risk. It will not remove the necessity for site-specific flood risk assessments which will still be needed to consider the specific risk of flooding to the development over its expected lifetime and address issues such as surface drainage and rainwater collection and discharge, as well as risks associated from fluvial or tidal flooding.

Culture, Media and Sport

Chess

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what recent assessment she has made of the case for chess to be recognised as a sport; and if she will make a statement. [8366]

The criteria that the sports councils use to decide whether an activity should be recognised as a sport are derived from their Royal Charters, and ultimately from the Physical Training and Recreation Act 1937. Legal advice has stated that chess does not fall within the meaning of the word sport" for the purposes of the Royal Charter, or the meaning of physical training and recreation" in the Act. Recognition of chess would therefore require amendments to the Act.

Sport is now a devolved matter, so a change in the current position would require the unanimous support of both the Devolved Administrations (DAs) and the sports councils, before any progress could be made. It would be necessary to put a case to the DAs and the sports councils for legislative change that would include chess, and if necessary other mind games", within the criteria for recognition as a sport. The case put forward must be able to convince them that chess provides the same benefits to the public, such as improved health and fitness, as recognised sports, in order to merit equal status and the financial support that comes with it.

Departmental Press Release

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport when she was first informed that her departmental press officer had disseminated a press release on behalf of her husband; and who authorised the press officer to take this action. [7293]

The press officer, acting on his own initiative, e-mailed a single newspaper with a statement on behalf of Mr. Mills. He was not asked or encouraged to do so, and I was made aware later that day that he had done so.

National Lottery

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport which constituencies have received (a) less than 10 per cent. and (b) less than 15 per cent. of the national average for constituencies of grants to good causes from the national lottery; and if she will make a statement. [8074]

This answer is based on the latest commercially available constituency boundary information, which does not include the boundary changes made in Scotland for the 2005 general election.

The following constituencies have received less than 10 per cent. of the average (mean) amount awarded in each constituency:

Hornchurch

Birmingham, Hall Green

Birmingham, Hodge Hill

Southend West

Romford

Hamilton South

Billericay

Constituencies that have received less than 15 per cent. of the average (mean) amount awarded in each constituency include the seven listed above, and the following eight:

Aberdeen South

Hayes and Harlington

Croydon South

Luton North

Newport East

Birmingham, Erdington

Birmingham, Yardley

Rayleigh

However the mean average of £23.9 million per constituency is distorted because of very large grants in a few constituencies. If the median average of £13.3 million is used, no constituencies have less than 10 per cent. of this and only Hornchurch and Birmingham, Hall Green have received less than 15 per cent.

The two lists of constituencies are derived from the Department's Lottery Awards Database which is based on information supplied by the lottery distributors.

Swimming Pools

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many swimming pools there have been in each London borough in each year since 1997. [8209]

The information requested is provided in the following table. The information includes swimming pools provided by public and private operators.

Of which: x" built in

London borough

Total number of pools

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Barking and Dagenham

8

1

1

Barnet

22

1

2

2

2

1

1

Bexley

14

1

1

2

Brent

8

1

Bromley

28

2

3

2

1

1

Camden

25

2

1

2

1

City of London

14

2

3

1

1

Croydon

28

1

1

2

2

4

Ealing

26

2

3

2

2

2

1

1

Enfield

16

1

1

2

Greenwich

16

1

Hackney

5

1

Hammersmith and Fulham

18

1

1

1

4

2

Haringey

16

1

Harrow

11

2

1

1

1

Havering

12

2

4

Hillingdon

20

1

2

2

1

Hounslow

16

1

1

Islington

13

1

1

2

1

Kensington and Chelsea

16

3

1

1

1

Kingston upon Thames

12

2

1

3

1

Lambeth

11

1

1

1

1

Lewisham

9

2

Merton

14

1

2

1

Newham

10

2

1

1

Redbridge

11

1

1

1

1

Richmond

19

2

Southwark

17

2

1

1

1

Sutton

12

1

Tower Hamlets

11

1

1

1

1

Waltham Forest

15

1

1

3

Wandsworth

20

1

1

1

Westminster

40

1

2

4

3

2

1

Transport

Buses

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport which local authorities in England subsidise the running of bus services. [8603]

The majority of subsidy for bus services outside London is provided by local transport authorities, that is county councils, unitary authorities and in metropolitan areas, passenger transport authorities. In some areas district councils also contribute to funding for bus services.

Computer Crime

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many cases of computer (a) hacking, (b) fraud and (c) theft his Department recorded in each year since 2001–02; and for each year, on how many occasions computer systems have been illegally accessed by computer hackers (i) within and (ii) outside his Department. [7186]

The Department and its Agencies recorded no cases of computer hacking in 2001–02, 30 cases in 2002–03, 71 cases in 2003–04, 31 cases in 2004–05 (internal source) and one case to date in 2005–06 (external source). Of these, the number of recorded cases attributed to fraud were 30 in 2002–03, 71 in 2003–04 and 30 in 2004–05.

The Department and its Agencies has recorded six cases of theft in 2001–02, 23 cases in 2002–03, 23 cases in 2003–04, 18 cases in 2004–05 and four cases to date in 2005–06. These cases were perpetrated by persons outside the Department and its Agencies.

Container Traffic

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what his most recent estimate is of the percentage of container traffic which entered the UK through (a) Harwich, (b) Felixstowe and (c) London which had final destinations north of the M62 and which was transported to those destinations by train. [7694]

The Department does not collect information about the destination of containers that enter UK ports and which are transported onwards by train.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what his most recent estimate is of the tonnage of container traffic which entered the UK through (a) Harwich, (b) Felixstowe and (c) London which went to destinations north of the M62 by lorry. [7695]

Separate information is not available for individual ports. However, it is estimated that in 2003 about 650,000 tonnes of container traffic entered the UK by lorry through ports in Essex, Greater London or Suffolk and had a final destination north of the M621 .

1 Including Greater Manchester, Merseyside and West Yorkshire Metropolitan Areas.

Source:

Continuing Survey of Road Goods Transport 2003"

Departmental Finance and Payroll Contract

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when the Partners Achieving Change Together (PACT) contract was let; and whether PACT work was offered to open competition via a notice in the Official Journal of the European Community prior to being let. [6556]

The PACT contract was let in September 2002. It was tendered under OJEC competitive procurement rules, supported by the OGC gateway review process. Nine respondents were long-listed, three were short-listed and negotiations undertaken with two.

Leeds Supertram

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he plans to make an announcement on the proposed Supertram scheme in Leeds; and if he will make a statement. [8382]

The Secretary of State made clear the position on the Supertram scheme in his Oral statement last summer on 20 July 2004, Official Report, column 159. Since then revised proposals have been submitted for consideration and will be decided upon in due course.

Light Rail Schemes

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many light rail schemes have been completed and opened since 1997. [9016]

The following light rail schemes have been completed and opened since 1997:

Midland Metro—1999

Docklands Light Railway extension to Lewisham—1999

Croydon Tramlink—2000

Manchester Metrolink Phase II (to Eccles)—2000

Tyne and Wear Metro Sunderland extension—2002

Nottingham Express Transit—2004

Railways

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many passengers per train there were on the North London line in each year since 1997. [8392]

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many rail passengers travelled from Shenfield to Heathrow in each month since 2003. [8537]

Repatriation (Airline Failures)

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what meetings have taken place between officials in his Department and officials in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to discuss arrangements to repatriate UK passengers in the event of a major airline failure. [8395]

The Government have in place contingency plans to deal with crises, including a major airline failure, and officials from this Department have met Foreign and Commonwealth Office officials on a number of occasions to discuss these arrangements.

Secure Station Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many stations there are in Greater London; if he will list those which have been accredited since 1998 under the secure station scheme; and what the (a) date of accreditation, (b) the dates of re-accreditation and (c) when accreditation lapsed was in each case. [8075]

Stations are awarded secure stations status for a two year period once they have met the required accreditation standards on station design, station management, crime management, and passenger perceptions.

There are 615 rail stations in Greater London, including 34 Docklands Light Rail and 257 London Underground stations. Of these stations 131 have been accredited since 1998 under the secure stations scheme, consisting of 55 first time accreditations, 31 re-accreditations and 45 lapsed stations. A list detailing these stations along with their respective accreditation, re-accreditation and lapsed dates has been placed in the Libraries of the House.

Travel Industry

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what recent discussions he has held with (a) the Association of British Travel Agents, (b) the Federation of Tour Operators and (c) the Association of Independent Tour Operators on the regulatory burden on the travel industry. [8305]

On 23 June 2005 I met representatives of the Association of Independent Tour Operators to discuss their concerns on the regulatory burden in the travel industry. On 3 May 2005 officials from this Department met representatives of the Association of British Travel Agents and the Federation of Tour Operators to discuss the same issue.

Vehicle Excise Duty

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the (a) total value and (b) percentage of total expected revenue of vehicle excise duty evasionis estimated to have been in each year since 1997–98. [5185]

Estimates of vehicle excise duty (VED) evasion are made by national roadside surveys undertaken by DfT statisticians. Surveys were carried out in 1994, 1999, 2002 and the latest survey took place in June 2004.

Estimated value of loss through VED evasion (£ million)

Estimated percentage of revenue due

1994

200

4.1

1999

191

3.9

2002

206

4.8

2004

129

3.4

Solicitor-General

BAE Systems

To ask the Solicitor-General whether the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) asked the Defence Export Services Organisation for (a) information and (b) co-operation in respect of the SFO's investigation into allegations of bribery and false accounting concerning BAE Systems and Saudi Arabian officials. [8129]

The question relates to an ongoing criminal investigation by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). In the circumstances, it would not be appropriate to either confirm or deny whether the SFO has approached a particular individual or entity.

Crown Prosecution Service

To ask the Solicitor-General how much has been spent on the Crown Prosecution Service in each of the last 10 years. [6575]

The following table gives the net expenditure on the Crown Prosecution Service in each of the last 10 years. Expenditure is reported in cash terms from 1995–96 to 2000–01 and in resource terms thereafter.

£000

1995–96

296,002

1996–97

299,412

1997–98

299,691

1998–99

307,417

1999–2000

308,774

2000–01

343,382

2001–02

427,975

2002–03

459,665

2003–04

525,619

2004–05

575,554

Work and Pensions

Autism

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what steps the Government are taking to help people with autism find employment; and if he will make a statement. [7740]

holding answer 28 June 2005

Our specialist Disability Employment Advisers (DEAs), who are based in jobcentres, receive training and guidance to help them support people with health conditions and disabilities into employment, including people with autism. The support provided by DEAs includes advice on jobs and training, as well as information on in-work support, and specialist programmes to help overcome barriers to employment associated with disability.

All our Jobcentre Plus advisers have access to a Disability Awareness Open Learning Handbook, which includes information on autistic spectrum disorders; the effects they have on individuals, the implications for work, and the possible types of support an individual might need in employment. This information was approved by the National Autistic Society and is recommended learning for all advisers, and mandatory learning for DEAs. We are currently working with the society on further enhancements.

All Jobcentre Plus staff, including DEAs, also have access to information on a range of disabilities, including autism, through guidance on our Intranet.

Incapacity Benefit

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people declared part-time earnings while claiming incapacity benefit in each of the last five years. [8497]

Jobcentres

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

(1) what representations he has received about the reduction of staff numbers in local job centres; [7306]

(2) what plans he has to reduce the number of staff at Jobcentre Plus offices. [7307]

holding answer 29 June 2005

The administration of Jobcentre Plus is a matter for the acting chief executive, Lesley Strathie. She will write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Lesley Strathie to Mr. Hugo Swire, dated 30 June 2005

The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your questions concerning what representations he has received about the reduction of staff numbers in local Jobcentres, and what plans he has to reduce the number of staff at Jobcentre Plus offices. This is something which falls within the responsibilities delegated to me as Acting Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus.

As announced in the 2004 Spending Review, the Department has plans to reduce overall staff numbers by 30,000 by 31 March 2008. Jobcentre Plus has agreed with the Department that its contribution towards that overall reduction would be a headcount target for March 2008 of 65,672 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) staff. To provide some context for that figure, at the end of May 2005 Jobcentre Plus employed 72,888 FTE staff.

There have been several representations to the Secretary of State on this subject. In addition, we are consulting closely with our recognised trade unions on the steps we are taking to meet our efficiency challenge. We consulted them whilst developing our Human Resources policies and procedures and reached a formal agreement in November 2004 on avoiding or, if that is not possible, minimising compulsory redundancies.

I hope this is helpful.

Mental Capacity Act

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what steps are being taken to bring appointeeships in line with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. [7082]

Officials are currently discussing the Act's draft Code of Conduct with officials of the Department for Constitutional Affairs, who are responsible for the implementation of the Act. They will also have discussions with the Making Decisions Alliance in the near future.

Treasury

Tax Credits

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent representations he has received regarding the operation of the tax credit system. [8154]

Since April 2005 tax credits have been the subject of debate or statements on a number of occasions in both Houses:

6 April 2005, Westminster Hall Debate (column 437WH)

7 June 2005, Westminster Hall Debate (column 47WH)

26 May 2005, Paymaster General's statement (column 23WS)

22 June 2005, Paymaster General's statement (column 801)

22 June 2005, Paymaster General's statement repeated in the House of Lords. (column 1677)

Various representations have been made on each of these occasions, to which Ministers responded at the time.

I have also answered several questions in the House and replied to letters from Members and others.

The Ombudsman's Office and Citizens Advice have also sent me copies of their reports published on 22 June.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much in overpayment of (a) working tax credit and (b) working family tax credit is owed to Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs. [8163]

Estimates of numbers and values of child tax credit and working tax credit overpayments for 2003–04 awards at 5 April 2004, appear in the HMRC publication, Child and Working Tax Credits Statistics. Finalised Awards 2003–04. Supplement on payments in 2003–04." The estimates are based on samples and are subject to significant sampling uncertainty. This publication can be found in the Library.

Working families' tax credit awards were based on a snapshot of income and circumstances around the time of claim, and were then fixed at a specific amount regardless of any rise or fall in income for 26 weeks.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will simplify the tax credits system so that it can be explained to applicants in significantly fewer pages of guidance notes than at present. [8164]

I refer the hon. Member to the written statement I made to the House on 26 May 2005, Official Report, columns 22–23WS, setting out six measures to improve tax credits and, in particular, with regard to how HMRC communicate with families about their tax credits award.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent representations he has received on the operation of the tax credits system. [8140]

I refer the hon. Gentleman to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Buckingham (John Bercow) in the Chamber this morning.

Child Poverty

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what progress he has made towards the target of eradicating child poverty within a generation; and what further action he intends to take in furtherance of meeting this target. [8155]

Child poverty more than doubled between 1979 and 1997, and was higher in the UK than anywhere else in the EU.

This Government's policy is that every child should have the opportunity to fulfil its potential. We have already lifted more than half a million children out of relative poverty, and are broadly on track to eradicate child poverty by reducing child poverty by a quarter in a quarter of the time.

Our strategy was set out in the Child Poverty Review last summer. We intend to go further by:

helping more people who want to work find work;

by providing financial support to help families with the costs of children;

by implementing our 10 Year Strategy for Childcare;

and by investing in our children's future so that by 2007–08 total funding for schools will be 60 per cent. higher than in 1996–97.

Debt Relief

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on his proposals for debt relief at the G8 summit. [8156]

Last month G7 finance ministers agreed a detailed plan to match 100 per cent. bilateral debt write off with 100 per cent. multilateral debt cancellation for the 38 heavily indebted poor countries.

This covers debts owed to the World Bank, International Monetary Fund and African Development fund of some $55 billion. 18 countries will have their debts cancelled immediately, worth around $40 billion once the plan is agreed by IMF and World Bank boards.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what progress is being made towards 100 per cent. multilateral debt relief. [8162]

Last month G7 Finance Ministers agreed a detailed plan to match 100 per cent. bilateral debt write off with 100 per cent. multilateral debt cancellation for the 38 heavily indebted poor countries.

This covers debts owed to the World Bank, International Monetary Fund and African Development fund of some 55 billion dollars. 18 countries will have their debts cancelled immediately, worth around 40billion dollars once the plan is agreed by IMF and World Bank boards.

Borrowing Forecast

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what changes he expects in the level of Government net borrowing in the next five years. [8157]

Budget projections show that net borrowing is expected to fall to a prudent level of 1.5 per cent. of GDP by 2009–10.

Shared Appreciation Mortgages

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on shared appreciation mortgages. [8158]

The Government understand the concerns of people who purchased shared appreciation mortgages in the mid 1990s. However, to date no evidence of mis-selling has been found by the Financial Ombudsman Service.

G8 (Economic Objectives)

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on his economic objectives for the Gleneagles summit. [8160]

At their meeting on 10–11 June chaired by the Chancellor, Finance Ministers prepared the economic and financial aspects of the G8 summit. They agreed: that vigorous action was required by each member country to support a smooth adjustment to more balanced growth; a wide-ranging set of actions to improve the operation of the oil market to manage high and volatile prices; and a comprehensive package of measures on debt relief, aid and development. All these agreements will be reflected in discussions at Gleneagles.

Foreign Currency Reserves

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what his latest estimate is of the value of the foreign currency reserves of the UK. [8161]

Details of the UK Official Holdings of International Reserves are released monthly and are available from the Treasury website. The latest figures for the end of May, were gross reserves of $47,718 million, equivalent to £26,183 million when converted using the (4 pm) closing market rate of £1=$1.8225 on 31 May.

National Insurance

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much was raised from national insurance contributions in 2004–05. [8153]

As set out in the Budget, national insurance contribution receipts for 2005–05 are forecasted to be £77.9 billion.

Stamp Duty

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer How much tax was raised from stamp duty in the (a) 1997–98 and (b) 2004–05 financial years. [8159]

Stamp duty on property transactions raised £1.5 billion in 1997–98, and stamp duty land tax, which replaced stamp duty in 2003, raised £6.3 billion in 2004–05.

Stamp duty on transactions in the shares of UK incorporated companies raised £1.96 billion in 1997–98. The figure for the 2004–05 financial year will be published in September.

Sustainable Development

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent discussions he has had with other Departments on sustainable development. [8149]

I regularly meet DEFRA and other Ministers to discuss a range of issues including sustainable development. HM Treasury is also actively involved in discussions on this important issue.

Home Department

Cherie Blair (Security Arrangements)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department

(1) what arrangements were made to ensure the safety of the Prime Minister's wife when she visited the US in June; and what the costs were; [7536]

(2) what security arrangements have been put in place for the Prime Minister's wife's visit to the Starhill Boutique complex in Kuala Lumpur on 31 July; and what the estimated costs are. [7545]

We seek to ensure the most effective and efficient protective security arrangements for public figures in the light of the changing threat from terrorism and other continuing risks. It is not our policy to comment on the details or costs of protective security arrangements for any individual, as to do so could compromise his or her security.

Civil Servants

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what value for money procurement savings were identified and what reduction in civil service posts occurred in his Department in 2004–05. [4545]

In pre-Budget report 2004, the Chancellor reported Office for Government Commerce (OGC) value for money gains in central civil Government procurement for 2003–04 of £2 billion. OGC value for money procurement gains for 2004–05 are being calculated and will be published in the 2005 Treasury autumn performance report.

In Budget 2005, the Chancellor announced a headcount reduction of 12,500 posts by the end of 2004–05, towards the Government's target of a gross reduction of 84,000 civil service and administrative posts by 2008. My Department's performance was reported in the 2005 Home Office annual report (Cm6528); the size of the Department's headquarters was reduced by 876 full time equivalent posts.

Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he will answer the letter dated 10 May 2005 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Fanny Garvey. [7929]

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he will answer the letter dated 10 May 2005 from the right hon. member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Ms. Zeinab Abdulrahman al-Hashmi. [7930]

Crime Figures

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) reported incidents and (b) judicial disposals of (i) violent crime, (ii) car crime, (iii) robbery and (iv) burglary there were in each of the last three years for each London borough; and what the percentage change in each case was in each year. [4776]

The available information relates to offences recorded and detected by each London borough. The statistics, including percentage changes, are available from the following web-links:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/cdrptabs.xls

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/hosb703sup1.xls

Departmental Relocation

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many of his Department's posts (a) have been relocated and (b) are under consideration for relocation from London to the deprived areas of the South East. [6268]

Following the recommendations of the Lyons Review, the Home Office is developing plans to relocate up to 2,200 posts out of London and the South East by 2010. This will not exclude consideration of moving some posts to relatively deprived areas of the South East.

Prison Education

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has for improving education services in prisons. [3709]

The way in which education and training are delivered in prisons, and the content of the learning offered, are changing. From August 2005, the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) will in three regions (the North West, North East and South West) take responsibility for delivering an integrated learning and skills service for offenders both in custody and the community, linking it much more explicitly with mainstream provision for post-16 learners. A greater focus on skills will lead to greater employability on release, thereby making a significant contribution to reducing re-offending. The remaining six regions in England will follow in August 2006.

The new service has at its heart the principle that education and training for offenders should be more flexible and learner centred. Literacy, language and numeracy will rightly continue to be a high priority for offender learning, but the new service will for the first time bring together the Education Service with vocational training, in the context of a broader curriculum. The key change in the new arrangements is early, intense focus on assessing the offender learner's needs and preparing an individual learning plan that will set out learning needs—and achievements—as the individual moves through the criminal justice system, creating a seamless learning journey for offenders across prisons and probation and up to release.

The key features of the new learning and skills service are outlined in a document called the Offender's Learning Journey", available at www.dfes.gov.uk/offenderlearning (you have to select the initiatives hyperlink to view the new delivery section.) The Offender's Learning Journey" specifies the content of the learning and skills service to be supported by the LSC from August 2005.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many and what percentage of the (a) adult and (b) youth prison population were in education in each year between 1994 and 2004. [3247]

The Prison Service do not collect centrally individual information on prisoners participating in learning and skills through its contracts with education providers.

However, the Youth Justice Board target is to provide all young people in young offender institutions with 25 hours per week of education, training and personal development.

For adults, a 2003 report published by the Learning and Skills Development Agency ('Education, Training, Assessment and Learner Support in HM Prisons and Young Offender Institutions'), found that 39 per cent. of prisoners were engaged in education and training.

Home Detention Curfew Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the Home Detention Curfew Scheme. [3977]

The Government consider the Home Detention Curfew Scheme (HDC) is working well and has no proposals for change.

The HDC scheme enables prisoners, primarily those serving sentences of between three months and under four years, to return to the community up to 135 days earlier than their normal release date (half-way point of the sentence). Prisoners must have a suitable address and pass a risk assessment before release can be granted. If considered suitable, prisoners are released under licence and are subject to an electronically monitored curfew, normally for 12 hours a day, at an address within England and Wales. If they breach the licence conditions they are liable to be returned to prison to serve the remaining custodial portion of their sentence in custody.

Certain categories of prisoners are statutorily excluded from HDC, including prisoners subject to the registration requirements of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and prisoners serving extended sentences. In addition, prisoners with any history of sexual offending or serving sentences for certain serious offences are presumed unsuitable for release on HDC unless there are exceptional reasons to grant release.

Prisoners serving determinate sentences of four years or more whose offences were committed on or after 4 April 2005 are not statutorily excluded from HDC but they will be presumed unsuitable for release on HDC unless the governor considers there are exceptional circumstances.

Lost/Stolen Passports

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many passports have been recorded as (a) lost and (b) stolen since the introduction of secure delivery. [6375]

The secure delivery of passports commenced on 9 February 2004. Since that time, almost 8.25 million deliveries have been completed. Up to 31 March 2005 a total of 683 passports have been recorded as lost or stolen in the post and have not reached the intended customer. Of these, 217 have been confirmed as stolen, 77 passports have subsequently been recovered and the remaining 389 are considered lost, but remain under investigation by UKPS or SMS, as they are likely to have been misposted and may yet be returned. In comparison in the final year of the Royal Mail contract 3,593 passports were reported lost or stolen.

National Probation Directorate (Risk Assessment)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will publish the risk assessment commissioned by the National Probation Directorate in March. [4967]

The Home Office published the National Probation Service (NPS) risk register, as agreed with the NPS Audit committee, identified as part of the 2005–06 Business Plan on the NPS website on 29 March. The summary of the risk was also published in the booklet that explains in detail the content of the 2005–06 Business Plan.

Victims of Crime (Online Information)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the project to make it possible for victims of crime to track the progress of their case online was initiated; what stage the project has reached; whether it is on schedule; and what the latest estimate of the cost of the project is. [4998]

The facility for victims of crime to track the progress of their case online was a target for the CJS IT programme in the SR2002 period (commencing 2003–04).

The No Witness No Justice" (NWNJ) initiative is setting up witness care units that provides trained intermediaries, who understand the needs of victims and witnesses and will be more responsive to their individual requirements. The IT tool to support the witness case officers is being rolled out now, with the first release available from 20 June 2005. This offers officers access to existing case data stored on the Crown Prosecution Service's case management system plus the ability to search by witnesses. Enhancements will be available in November 2005 that will allow the officers to add/amend case details relating to victims and witnesses.

This IT support is being funded from within the CJSIT ring-fence, with allocations of £1.2 million in 2004–05 and £6.5 million in 2005–06.

Police (Assaults)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many policemen have been hospitalised following assaults while on active duty in each of the last five years. [5226]

Prisons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many additional prison places have been provided, and at what cost, in each of the last six years; what the average cost of building a new prison place is; and if he will make a statement. [4611]

The number of prison places provided in each financial year since 2000–01, and the cost of providing these places, is provided in the table. These figures include both expansions at existing establishments and the construction of new prisons.

The average cost for providing these prison places is £99,839, also including both the costs of capacity expansions at existing prisons and the construction of new prisons.

Annex A

Number of places provided

Cost (£ million)

2005–06

1,120

(34)

2004–05

2,571

291.4

2003–04

1,372

136.5

2002–03

1,818

158.8

2001–02

1,013

105.2

2000–01

680

52.3

(34)The number of places for 2005–06 includes all places currently scheduled for delivery during 2005–06. Full details of costs for 2005–06 are not yet available.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many young people were held in adult prisons on the latest date for which figures are available. [2725]

holding answer 9 June 2005

On 30 April 2005 there were 3,287 young persons aged under 21. This includes some 21-year-olds who have not yet been reclassified as adults held in prison establishments which also hold adults, as recorded on the Prison Service IT system.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has to change the maximum length of prison sentence that can be passed by a magistrate; and if he will make a statement. [1722]

The maximum custodial penalty a magistrate can pass is currently six months for a single offence; the Criminal Justice Act 2003 increases this to 12 months. Implementation will be in September 2006.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he has plans to penalise the contractors at HMP Rye Hill following its recent inspection and controller reports. [3874]

Recent events, including the forthcoming HMIP inspection report of HMP Rye Hill, will be given due consideration by the Office for Contracted Prisons in deciding whether to penalise the contractor for failing to deliver against the contract. All available options will be considered, including the imposition of financial penalties.

To ask the Secretary of State for the HomeDepartment how many instances of the finding of illicit alcohol there were at Rye Hill Prison during 2004–05 [3876]

A total of 72 finds of illicit alcohol (fermenting liquid) were reported at HMP Rye Hill during the 2004–05 financial year.

Private Finance Initiative

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the private finance initiative and public private partnership projects his Department is undertaking; and what the status of each is. [2372]

The table lists the private finance initiative and public private partnership projects which the Home Department is currently engaged and their status.

Home Office PFI/PPP projects

Commissioning body/project name

Signed

Operational

Home Office/IT 2000 (Sirius)

Yes

Yes

Youth Justice Board/STC Cookham Wood (Medway)

Yes

Yes

Youth Justice Board/STC Hassockfield

Yes

Yes

Youth Justice Board/STC Rainsbrook (Onley) Expansion

Yes

Yes

Youth Justice Board/STC Oakhill Expansion

Yes

Yes

STC HMP and YOI Ashfield/HMPS

Yes

Yes

Prison Service/HMP Altcourse

Yes

Yes

Prison Service/HMP Ashford

Yes

Yes

Prison Service/HMP Dovegate

Yes

Yes

Prison Service/HMP Forest Bank

Yes

Yes

Prison Service/HMP Lowdham Grange

Yes

Yes

Prison Service/HMP Pare

Yes

Yes

Prison Service/HMP Peterborough

Yes

Yes

Prison Service/HMP Rye Hill

Yes

Yes

Prison Service/Quantum

Yes

Yes

Passport Service/PASS Project

Yes

Yes

Home Office/Home Office Central London Accommodation Strategy (2 Marsham Street)

Yes

Yes

Prison Service/HES 1

Yes

Yes

Prison Service/HES 2

Yes

Yes

Probation Service/Resources

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what ratio of staff to clients is operated by the London Probation Service; and if he will make a statement. [2865]

For every operational member of staff there are 60 offenders of whom 25 will be in prison and 35 in the community.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has to target probation resources at (a) high risk and (b) very high risk offenders. [4994]

The National Offender Management Model, sent to all probation areas in January, embodies the principle that resources should follow risk and, in particular, that greater resources should be devoted to those offenders who are assessed as being of high and very high risk of re-offending and of causing harm to the public. There is a tiering framework that helps offender managers to allocate offenders to the appropriate level of risk and resource.

All probation areas are required to implement the Model and have it fully operational for all community sentences by March 2006. The Model will then be used for all custodial sentences by March 2008.

The Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA), established by the Criminal Justice and Courts Services Act 2000 to reduce the serious re-offending behaviour of sexual and violent offenders and to protect the public, also embody the principle that resources follow risk.

Publication Costs

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much his Department has spent on producing publications in each year since 1997. [7006]

The amount spent by the Home Office on the printing of publications was:

£

1999–2000

2,626,032.15

2000–01

3,128,079.64

2001–02

2,994,877.00

2002–03

2,492,883.96

2003–04

2,986,017.11

2004–05

2,233,511.70

The costs provided are those recorded centrally by the Home Office Communication Directorate. These are printing costs only. Other costs involved in production e.g. design, artwork have not been recorded centrally.

Data are not available before 1999 as prior to this date, publications spend was not recorded centrally.

Rape Crisis Organisations

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many rape crisis organisations, and other organisations helping female survivors of sexual violence, received funding from his Department in (a) 2001, (b) 2002, (c) 2003 and (d) 2004; and how much each organisation received . [1519]

The Home Office funded the rape crisis federation, an umbrella body for some 43 local rape crisis groups, from April 2001 until its closure in November 2003. Funding in the financial years between 2001 and 2004 was as follows:

£

(a) 2001–02

406,000

(b) 2002–03

432,000

(c) 2003–04

209,800

In 2004 additional funding of £4 million over two financial years was placed in the victims fund to support the development of services for victims of sexual offending. In 2004–05 financial year, 45 organisations received funding to provide a range of community-based services to male and female victims of sexual violence. Of those, 34 organisations provide women-only or gender-neutral services. Details of victims fund awards for the 2004–05 financial year are set out in the table.

Victims fund—2004–05 grant funding

Organisation

Client Group

Awarded funding (£)

Breaking Free

Women victims and survivors of childhood sexual abuse

10,284

CIS'ters

Female adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse

23,350

Colchester Rape Crisis Line (CRCL)

Female victims of sexual violence

35,450

Cornwall Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre (CRASAC)

All victims of sexual violence and abuse

8,120

Coventry Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre (CRASAC)

Female victims of sexual violence and abuse

4,910

Croydon Rape and Sexual Abuse Support Centre

All survivors of rape and/or childhood sexual abuse

27,080

Doncaster Rape and Sexual Abuse Counselling Centre

All victims of sexual violence (aged 14 plus)

3,066

East Kent Rape Line

Female victims of sexual violence

9,688

Family Matters

All victims of childhood sexual abuse

5,752

Grimsby and Scunthorpe Rape Crisis

All adult victims of sexual violence

6,102

Helping Everyone Abused Live (HEAL)

All victims of childhood sexual abuse

10,286

The Jigsaw Project

All victims of sexual violence

9,975

Lilith Project

Women experiencing violence

14,329

Merseyside Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre

Female victims of sexual violence

12,672

National Association for People Abused in Childhood

(NAPAC)

Adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse

15,000

New Pathways

All victims of sexual violence

16,500

The NIA Project

Female victims of physical/sexual violence

8,960

North West Wales Rape and Sexual Abuse Support

Centre

All victims of sexual violence

7,685

One in Four

Adult victims of sexual violence

24,993

The Quetzal Project

Female victims of sexual abuse

46,000

Rape Crisis Co-ordination Group (RCCG)

All victims of sexual violence

18,200

Rape and Sexual Violence Project

All victims of sexual violence

12,500

Rights of Women

Female victims of sexual violence and abuse

21 ,000

Sexual and Domestic Abuse and Rape Advice Centre

All victims of sexual or domestic violence

18,036

Sheffield Women's Counselling and Therapy Service

Female victims of childhood sexual abuse.

12,500

Southampton Rape Crisis and Sexual Abuse Counselling

Service (SRC)

All victims of sexual violence

3,700

South Essex Rape and Incest Crisis Centre (SERICC)

Female victims of sexual violence (aged 13 plus)

31,520

The Survivors Trust

Represents specialist voluntary sector organisations

32,800

Warrington Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre

All victims of sexual violence

5,995

Warrington Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre (linked with

above recommendation)

All victims of sexual violence

7,745

Women's Counselling Service

Female victims of sexual violence

2,000

Women's Counselling and Therapy Service Leeds

Adult female survivors of childhood sexual abuse

670

Women and Girls Network

Female victims of sexual, physical or emotional violence

31,700

Women's Support Network

Female victims of domestic/sexual violence

19,450

Worcestershire Rape and Sexual Abuse Support Centre

(WRSASC)

Adult female victims of sexual violence

23,439

Rehabilitation of Offenders Act

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what steps he has taken to implement the recommendations of the 2002 review of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974. [4680]

The Government response to the 2002 review of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, was published in April 2003.

The Government accepted the majority of the review's recommendations and proposes to legislate as soon as there is an appropriate parliamentary opportunity.

UK-US Data Transfer

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the memoranda of understanding governing the exchange of information between the UK and US (a) governments and (b) law enforcement agencies. [4676]

The Home Office does not hold a comprehensive list of all agreements with the United States, and law enforcement agencies can negotiate memoranda of understanding with other countries on their own initiative.

Young Offenders

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many crimes have been committed on school premises by persons under 18 years in each of the last five years for which figures are available, broken down by category of offence. [5825]

holding answer 20 June 2005

The Home Office recorded crime statistics do not separately identify those offences which took place on school premises and so the information requested is not available.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the target is of the Youth Justice Board for the number of hours a week young offenders should spend in education; and how many juvenile establishments met this target in (i) 2002–03 and (ii) 2003–04. [4496]

The targets for education in the custodial establishments for juvenile offenders with which the Youth Justice Board had contractual arrangements or service level agreements in 2002–03 and 2003–04 were as follows:

2002–03

Prison Service young offender institutions: 15 hours a week

Contracted-out young offender institution: no target

Secure training centres: 25 hours a week

Local authority secure children's homes: no target

2003–04

Prison Service young offender institutions: 20 hours a week

Contracted-out young offender institution: 30 hours a week

Secure training centres: 25 hours a week

Local authority secure children's homes: 25 hours a week

The Youth Justice Board reports performance against target as follows:

2002–03

14 of the 15 young offender institutions run by the Prison Service met the target.

Apart from one centre for a period in September, all secure training centres met the target.

There are no centrally-collected data relating to educational performance of local authority secure children's homes or the contracted-out young offender institution in 2002–03.

2003–04

10 of the 13 young offender institutions run by the Prison Service met the target.

All secure training centres met the target.

There is no centrally-collected data relating to educational performance of local authority secure children's homes or the contracted-out young offender institution in 2002–03.

International Development

Aid Missions

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what provision the Government have made to continue aid missions in countries without British embassies. [7007]

DFID uses a number of management arrangements to administer its overseas aid programmes. A limited number of aid programmes are managed from the UK, while the majority are managed from offices in the country concerned. DFID Country Offices may be co-located with a British Embassy or High Commission, or may operate from stand-alone premises, depending on local circumstances. Were an Embassy to close in a country where we are already operating, we would review management arrangements. However, our aid programmes are not contingent on the presence of a British Embassy. Examples of countries where DFID operates successfully, but where there is no British Embassy, are Nicaragua and Kyrgyzstan.

Computer Crime

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how many cases of computer (a) hacking, (b) fraud and (c) theft his Department recorded in each year since 2001–02; and for each year, on how many occasions computer systems have been illegally accessed by computer hackers (i)within and (ii) outside his Department. [7185]

The numbers of cases of computer hacking, fraud and theft in DFID were as follows:

Hacking

Fraud

Theft

2001–02

0

0

8

2002–03

0

0

7

2003–04

1

0

7

2004–05

1

0

4

DFID computer systems were accessed illegally by computer hackers from outside the Department on one occasion in each of the years 2003–04 and 2004–05.

Debt Relief

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what bilateral and multilateral discussions have taken place regarding debt relief for (a) Bolivia, (b) Guyana, (c) Honduras, (d) Lao People's Democratic Republic and (e) Nicaragua. [6939]

There have been extensive bilateral and multilateral discussions on debt relief for these countries. Most recently, both the Chancellor and I met President Jagdeo of Guyana to discuss debt relief among other issues.

Bolivia, Guyana, Honduras, the Lao People's Democratic Republic (LAO PDR), and Nicaragua are all classified as Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC). They are therefore eligible for the debt relief being provided to HIPC countries that have demonstrated their commitment to poverty reduction. Bolivia, Guyana, Honduras and Nicaragua have all successfully completed the HIPC process. As part of this, their progress in reducing poverty and implementing economic reforms was discussed a number of times at the World Bank and other financial institutions. The Lao PDR is not opting for debt relief at present, so no such discussions have taken place.

Recently, G8 Finance Ministers agreed a further debt relief initiative which, when agreed by the Boards of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the African Development Bank, would cancel up to $55 billion worth of debt stock for 38 countries. Bolivia, Guyana, Honduras and Nicaragua are among 18 countries that would qualify for this assistance immediately. The proposal will be discussed at the World Bank and the IMF Annual Meetings.

Education (Millennium Development Goal)

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what recent assessment he has made of progress towards the Millennium Development Goal to provide universal primary education in Africa. [5693]

pursuant to the reply, 23 June 2005, Official Report, c. 1134W

There was a factual error in the final sentence of my original response. DFID has committed to providing £1.4 billion to education globally over the next three years, rather than to Africa alone as stated.

Everything but Arms Agreement

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what the remit of the Everything but Arms agreement is; and what assessment has been made of its effectiveness. [5621]

The Everything but Arms initiative (EBA) is the EU scheme to give all least developed countries duty and quota free access to the EU market for all products, except armaments. The scheme was introduced in February 2001. Three products, however, were deemed sensitive enough for the EU not to open its borders to them immediately. Full, unrestricted market access for these products—sugar, rice and bananas—is being phased in gradually and will be completed in 2009.

There have been several assessments of the effects of the scheme, including by the World Bank who concluded that the impact of EBA has been relatively limited, partly because the vast majority (some 99 per cent.) of EU imports from the LDCs are in products that the EU had already liberalised, and the complete removal of barriers to the key remaining products, rice, sugar and bananas has been delayed. There is a group of the LDCs for whom EU trade preferences on existing exports are not significant since these exports are mainly of products where the normal rate of duty is already zero. Export diversification is the key issue for these countries. For other LDCs, EU preferences have the potential to provide a more substantial impact on trade.

However, the World Bank assessment shows that only 50 per cent. of EU imports from those eligible LDCs, who are not from the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) grouping, actually request preferential access to the EU. The prime reason for this low level of utilisation would appear to be the rules of origin—how or where a product can be produced in order to qualify for a preference. This is because in many cases, the criteria are set so that in practice an LDC must produce a product entirely within its borders, including any inputs or components, in order to qualify for preferential treatment. This requirement is beyond the production capacity of most LDCs, and indeed does not reflect modern business and production patterns, where components or other inputs such as yarn or fabric are imported from the most competitive sources wherever they may be. The World Bank, and indeed many others, recommends more simple and liberal rules of origin to enhance the impact of EU trade preferences both in terms of improving market access and in stimulating diversification towards a broader range of exports. We have already seen this effect in certain African exports to the US, and some Asian exports to Canada.

The EU is currently reviewing its Rules of Origin, with a view to changing them. Building on the evidence available, the UK will be pressing to ensure that the changes better reflect current business practices and support, rather than hinder, the operation of preference schemes and the economic development these schemes are intended to stimulate.

Female Education (Africa)

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what recent assessment he has made of progress towards access to education for women in Africa. [6985]

holding answer 27 June 2005

The most recent assessment of progress towards all the Millennium Development Goals (MDG)s) is a United Nations report published in June 2005.

The picture of girl's access to education is not uniform across Africa. As reported in the United Nations Millennium Development Goal Report (2005), Sub-Saharan Africa has made limited progress towards increasing girl's access to education. The most recently available figures from 2001 indicate that 86 girls per 100 boys are enrolled at primary school and 79 girls per hundred boys are enrolled in secondary school. The UN's 2004 chart shows that this region is not on track to meet the equal girls enrolment in primary and secondary school MDG targets by 2015 without dramatically scaled up efforts. However the picture is quite different in Northern Africa, with 93 and 96 girls per 100 boys enrolled in primary and secondary schools respectively and the region on track to meet both these MDG targets.

DFID puts a high priority on expanding primary school enrolment and promoting girls education in Africa.

Health Care (Developing Countries)

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development

(1) what discussions he has had with the World Bank on its policy on charging user fees for health care in developing countries; [6752]

(2) what plans there are to discuss charging of user fees for health care in developing countries at the G8 summit in July; [6753]

(3) what assessment he has made of the merits of charging user fees for health care in developing countries. [6754]

DFID's recent assessments are that official user fees contribute minimal amounts to the financing of public services. Additionally, official user fees are a significant barrier to poor people's access to basic health services. In the poorest countries, there has been little success implementing fee exemptions and waivers targeted to poor people. Evidence from Uganda and elsewhere suggests that removing official fees boosts access to services. Therefore, DFID strongly supports the removal of official user fees for basic health care.

Other fees and charges such as those for medicines, for transport to clinics, and informal or private charges for service, can be more significant in scale, both as a barrier to access and in terms of the revenue they generate. DFID supports the removal of other fees and charges, and helps countries to identify alternative sources of finance for basic health care.

The G8 summit will discuss financing of health care as part of the Africa agenda. To make improved access to services a reality, we are encouraging the removal of user fees and we are seeking significantly increased resources for health. At Gleneagles we are calling for an extra $50billion a year in development assistance. DFID has regular policy discussions with the World Bank at both Headquarters and country level. This includes discussions on options for financing of health services—the World Bank does not have a blanket policy on user fees. We will continue to work with the World Bank, and other partners such as the World Health Organisation, in supporting countries to make progress towards universal access to basic health services.

International Development Organisations (Subscriptions)

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how much the Government have committed to the (a) World Bank Group, (b) European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, (c) European Investment Bank, (d) Asian Development Bank, (e) African Development Bank and (f) Inter American Development Bank in each of the last five years, broken down by (i) subscribed funds, (ii) unsubscribed funds and (iii) sums paid in capital. [6843]

holding answer 23 June 2005

The financing arrangements of the World Bank Group, Asian Development Bank (AsDB), African Development Bank (AfDB) and Inter-American Development Bank (IaDB) are broadly similar in structure. Capital subscriptions were paid in when the UK joined these institutions, and further amounts are held by the UK, and other shareholders, as callable" capital—that is money which the bank can draw upon if necessary. There have been no demands by these institutions on the UK's callable capital in the last five years.

These institutions make loans on different terms. Loans at or near market rates are provided to better-off countries, and are self-financing. In addition, each of these institutions has a concessional lending arm that provides low interest, long-term loans and grants to poorer countries. The funding for these concessional resources is supplemented—replenished—by donor governments on roughly three-year cycles. The following table shows the amounts committed by the UK to the replenishments over the last five years. There have been no replenishments for the Inter-American Development Bank during this time.

£ million

International Development Association of the World Bank

African Development Fund of the AfDB

Asian Development Fund of the AsDB

2000–01

2001–02

84.7

2002–03

1,000

121.8

2003–04

2004–05

1,330

178.7

114.1

Note:

Commitments shown under 2004–05 are subject to parliamentary approval.

In addition to the amounts shown, incentive" contributions have been agreed, which are conditional on progress being achieved in key areas. The amounts are £100 million for the World Bank and £27.5 million for the African Development Bank. The case for an additional contribution to the Asian Development Bank will be considered at the end of 2006.

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development was established in 1991. The UK share of the bank's capital is 8.5 per cent., which is around €1.7billion. Of this, €446 million is paid-in capital, and the Government are making annual instalments of around £16 million to fulfil this commitment; the total amount will have been paid by 2009. EBRD does not make concessional loans.

After the enlargement of the European Union in 2004, the European Investment Bank's (EIB) capital was increased to €164 billion. The UK has a share of 16.3 per cent., which is €26.6 billion. Of this amount, only 5 per cent. is paid-in capital. In the last five years, there have been increases in the UK's share of the subscribed and paid-in capital but these have been fully paid from the European Investment Bank's Reserves. EIB lending is predominately non-concessional.

In addition to the contributions we provide to these institutions' core budgets, DFID provides funding to forward particular objectives or to finance specific projects and activities. Such financing includes country specific trust funds, for example for Afghanistan; funding for research and analysis; and resources for centrally-managed initiatives such as the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries' Trust Fund, which channels donor resources to assist multilateral organisations provide their share of debt relief to countries.

Iraq

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what assistance his Department has provided to the government of Iraq in developing (a) running water, (b) sanitation (c) electricity and (d) gas services. [6936]

DFID has committed more than £70 million in bilateral assistance towards improved water, electricity and fuel supplies in southern Iraq, to the benefit of over five million people. £20 million was spent on an Emergency Infrastructure Programme in 2003 and 2004, and a further £18 million has been committed for quick-impact emergency infrastructure rehabilitation in 2004 and 2005. A new £40 million power, water and fuel project began in April 2005, which will provide technical advice to the Ministry of Electricity in Baghdad on the development of a national energy strategy as well as improving infrastructure in southern Iraq.

DFID also funds a team of technical advisers to help co-ordinate reconstruction projects in line with Iraqi priorities in southern Iraq, working closely with the UK military, the US Project and Contracting Office (PCO) and other donors.

Further DFID support for essential services in Iraq has been channelled through UN agencies. Full details of DFID's contribution to reconstruction in Iraq can be found at www.dfid.gov.uk/countries/asia/iraq.asp.

Latin America

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development if he will make a statement on Latin America's progress towards reaching the millennium development goals by 2015; and if he will make a statement. [7364]

Latin America's progress towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) has been very uneven. Each country has made different degrees of progress towards different targets, and at widely varying speeds.

The region appears to be on track to meet its 2015 targets for education, access to water and sanitation, and reducing hunger. In particular, rapid progress has been made towards reducing the prevalence of underweight children, universalising net enrolment in primary schools, reducing child and infant mortality, and increasing the proportion of the population with access to improved water sources. Insufficient progress has been made, however, on getting all children to actually complete primary school, halting the spread of HIV, and reversing the loss of environmental resources. Mixed progress has been made on income poverty and hunger reduction, the coverage of improved sanitation, and the various indicators of gender equity. While the proportion of the region's population living in slums has fallen slightly, absolute numbers have actually increased. Because of data limitations, it is very difficult to assess progress on improving maternal health.

Even within countries, there tend to be marked differentials between ethnic groups and different geographic regions. Because Latin America has such high levels of inequality, it is important not to let national average figures obscure these pockets of poverty and social exclusion.

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what progress his Department has made in working with the (a) Inter-American Development Bank and (b) World Bank to improve the access of poor and excluded people in Latin America to (i) local and national markets and (ii)international trade. [7369]

DFID has recently concluded the design of a new £7.6 million programme (the Latin America Markets and International Trade programme) to help the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) and World Bank to better facilitate increased access of poor people in Latin America to markets and the benefits of international trade. The design of the programme has involved extensive dialogue with these Banks as well with non-governmental organisations and other partners. It will be implemented over the next four years and will be evaluated in 2006–07 and at its conclusion in 2008–09.

The programme will build on other existing and planned co-operation between DFID and the Banks. In Bolivia, for example, the IDB's participation in DFID's 'Making Markets Work for the Poor' project has provided lessons for a large IDB project to support access to markets of poor, small-scale farmers. In Nicaragua, DFID will be supporting greater access of poor people to markets in the eco-tourism sector in a way that is intended to influence both IDB municipal development projects as well as a World Bank competitiveness project in the country.

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what his Department's (a) bilateral and (b) ultilateral expenditure has been in each year since 1997 in (i) each country in Latin America and (ii) Latin America; and if he will ake a statement. [7370]

DFID's bilateral expenditure for prior years was as follows:

£ million

Country

1997–98

1998–99

1999–2000

2000–01

2001–02

2002–03

2003–04

Costa Rica

0.30

0.21

0.12

0.18

0.12

0.07

0.12

El Salvador

0.21

0.30

0.32

1.82

0.43

0.34

0.11

Guatemala

0.40

0.48

0.37

0.32

0.42

0.29

0.24

Honduras

1.17

2.58

2.10

1.37

1.22

1.18

0.91

Mexico

4.05

3.79

2.17

1.54

0.51

0.56

0.07

Nicaragua

1.01

2.00

1.15

0.64

0.61

1.37

1.03

Panama

0.43

0.37

0.32

0.23

0.16

0.04

Central America Regional

10.42

1.41

0.86

2.41

4.39

4.41

Argentina

0.14

0.16

0.13

0.01

Bolivia

4.40

4.36

6.33

7.59

12.68

9.32

7.06

Brazil

7.02

7.48

6.39

6.78

7.00

11.24

7.06

Chile

1.14

1.03

0.41

0.10

0.15

0.40

Colombia

2.23

2.62

1.54

1.73

0.93

0.60

0.40

Ecuador

1.52

1.10

0.75

0.54

0.28

0.36

0.19

Paraguay

0.20

0.26

0.26

0.18

0.09

0.07

Peru

4.07

3.73

4.51

4.30

8.17

3.40

2.82

Uruguay

0.22

0.25

0.30

Venezuela

0.18

0.18

0.94

0.04

Latin America Regional

0.35

0.85

0.17

0.22

0.53

1.45

1.37

Figures are not yet available for 2004–05. It is not possible to disaggregate funding through our regional programmes on a country basis. However, most countries in Central and Latin America will have benefited from our regional programmes.

Multilateral institutions record funding by calendar year. The UK share of funding of grants and concessional lending by these institutions was as follows:

£ million

Country

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

Central American countries

Costa Rica

0.28

0.89

0.38

0.32

0.29

0.25

El Salvador

1.90

2.27

1.41

2.31

2.02

2.04

Guatemala

2.90

3.39

3.10

3.36

2.58

3.73

Honduras

5.28

5.49

5.05

4.65

12.54

1.73

Mexico

1.05

1.06

1.09

1.00

3.00

1.16

Nicaragua

5.79

10.71

5.94

10.65

9.88

3.31

Panama

0.43

0.50

0.50

0.59

0.50

1.31

Latin American Countries

Argentina

1.50

2.56

3.63

3.25

15.71

-6.07(35)

Bolivia

9.88

8.47

2.41

6.58

11. 54

0.68

Brazil

3.05

4.51

5.66

8.78

14.12

11.17

Chile

2.19

0.70

0.49

0.98

1.18

-0.74(35)

Colombia

2.65

1.25

1.64

2.43

2.11

1.80

Ecuador

0.93

1.63

1.29

1.25

0.83

1.07

Paraguay

0.80

0.51

0.57

0.78

0.96

0.98

Peru

2.42

9.29

3.50

4.02

3.06

1.91

Uruguay

0.37

0.49

0.37

0.44

0.35

0.31

Venezuela

0.48

0.85

0.51

1.52

0.79

0.90

(35)Debt repayments on concessional lending exceeded new grants and concessional loans to these countries.

Figures are not yet available for calendar years 2003 and 2004.

Malarial Infection

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how much his Department has invested in research into the role fungal spores may play in combating malarial infection. [7732]

Neither DFID nor the EC have invested in research specifically into the role that fungal spores can play in combating malarial infection. Research in this area was funded in the UK by the Wellcome Trust. The possible use of fungal spores is a recent addition to the range of interventions which play a role in malaria control, of which DFID funds research into new drug development, improved health systems and bed nets totalling £2 million per year.

Medical Staff (Developing World)

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development if he will make a statement on the UK's recruitment of medical staff from the developing world. [7896]

The UK is the only developed country to have implemented and reviewed policies that explicitly prevent the targeting of developing countries for recruitment of health workers. The Code of Practice for International Recruitment of Healthcare Professionals (available at http://www.dh.gov.uk), prevents the NHS from actively recruiting healthcare professionals from low and middle-income countries unless there is a government-to-government agreement in place. The code of practice was revised and strengthened last year to widen its scope to include temporary workers and to enable all healthcare organisations, including in the independent sector, to sign up to its principles.

Middle East

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what assessment he has made of the potential danger from asbestos and other materials in the rubble of settlement buildings cleared by Israel in connection with the Gaza disengagement plan; and what sources have offered funding to tackle the problem. [7480]

DFID takes very seriously the potential danger from asbestos and other materials caused by the demolition of settlement buildings by Israel during its disengagement from Gaza. We understand that a World Bank expert is in place to advise Israeli and Palestinian authorities on the issue of rubble disposal. We have no current plans to carry out our own assessment. DFID is supporting the Rapid Action Programme being drawn up by James Wolfensohn, the Quartet's Special Envoy for Disengagement.

Millennium Development Goals

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development if he will make a statement on the progress made towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals by 2015. [6938]

Progress towards the Millennium Development Goals varies. The world is on track to meet the poverty reduction goal. The number of people in Asia living on less than $1 a day dropped by nearly a quarter of a billion between 1990 and 2001. However progress toward the other seven goals is more varied. Sub Saharan Africa in particular will not meet any of the goals by 2015 if current rates of progress continue. The Commission for Africa chaired by the Prime Minister has set out plans for faster progress including action by African governments, and stronger support by international partners. The UK has made Africa central to our presidency of the G8 this year. We are looking for the Gleneagles G8 summit next week, and the Millennium Review Summit in September, to further strengthen international support to Africa through aid, debt relief and trade.

The recently published United Nations Millennium Development Goals Report is a comprehensive account of progress to date on each of the goals, and how great an effort remains necessary to meet them. It can be found at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/mi/mi_dev_report. htm. DFID also published a report in January 2005 titled The UK's contributions to achieving the Millennium Development Goals'. A copy of the report is available in the House of Commons Library.

Defence

Afghanistan

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans the Government have for the further deployment of British troops to Afghanistan. [6934]

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) where the additional (a) air forces and (b) ground forces will be based when additional UK forces are deployed in Afghanistan; and in what numbers; [7608]

(2) when the planned reinforcement of UK forces in Afghanistan will begin. [7607]

It remains our intention to deploy the HQ Allied Rapid Reaction Corps for nine months from May 2006 in command of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, as announced by the Prime Minister last June. The Government keep the deployment of our armed forces to Afghanistan under constant review.

Catterick Infantry Training Centre

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) what the maximum capacity for recruitsis of each Catterick Infantry Training Centre battalion; [7611]

(2) how many recruits are under training at Catterick Infantry Training Centre (ITC) (a) broken down by divisions of infantry and (b) in each ITC battalion. [7610]

The maximum capacity for recruits at the Infantry Training Centre (Catterick) (ITC(C)) is limited by the number of bed spaces available to recruits.

Currently, these are as follows:

Battalion

Bed spaces

1st

810

2nd

850

3rd

710

4th (For those temporarily medically unfit)

130

In addition, there are 400 surge bed spaces available at Wathgill Camp, some 10 miles from ITC(C).

The numbers of recruits under training at ITC(C) as at 24 June 2005, broken down by Division, are as follows:

Division

Number under training

Kings

180

Queens

190

Light

130

1stBattalion total

490

Scottish

150

Prince of Wales

160

2nd Battalion total

310

Guards

210

Paras

100

Gurkha

230

3rd Battalion total

540

Notes:

1.There are also currently 90 soldiers in 4th Battalion who are temporarily medically unfit.

2.All data has been rounded to the nearest 10.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many infantry combatant's courses at Catterick Infantry Training Centre have been cancelled over the past 12 months. [7612]

In the last 12 months, three Combat Infantryman's Courses, scheduled to start on 2, 16 and 30 August 2004, were cancelled at the Infantry Training Centre (Catterick). All applicants for these courses have, however, been offered alternative courses, and none has been turned away.

Departmental Relocation

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many of his Department's posts (a) have been relocated and (b) are under consideration for relocationfrom London to the deprived areas of the South East. [6253]

The Ministry of Defence is implementing the Lyons Review recommendations to relocate 3,900 posts out of London and the South East by 2010. This will not exclude from consideration relocation of some posts to relatively deprived areas in the South East. So far, the Ministry of Defence has not identified any posts suitable for transfer to such areas.

First World War Medal Index Cards

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) what steps he has taken to ensure that the information contained on both sides of first world war medal index cards is digitally stored; and if he will make a statement; [7985]

(2) what steps he has taken to ensure that digital copies of first world war medal index cards are of good quality; and if he will make a statement. [7986]

The index cards to the first world war army medal rolls are already preserved in a microfilmed format, an activity commenced by The National Archives in 1985, and available to researchers at The National Archives (in Class WO 372) and through the National Archives website online. The microfilming process captured the information held on the front of the cards, all but a very small percentage of the backs of the cards being blank.

The Ministry of Defence has no further administrative use for the cards and, with The National Archives, has actively sought to identify a suitable institution prepared to accept the original cards, understanding the value attached to such records by many people. The Imperial War Museum has accepted the women's cards and the remainder of the collection has been transferred into the custody of the Western Front Association.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) what institutions his Department has approached with a view to finding a home for the original first world war medal index cards; and if he will make a statement; [7987]

(2) when he expects to make a decision on whether to retain the original first world war medal index cards; and if he will make a statement. [7988]

The Ministry of Defence, together with The National Archives, has held discussions with the Imperial War Museum (IWM), the National Army Museum, the Fleet Air Arm Museum, the Women's Library and with representatives of Lancashire Military Museums. The future of the cards has also been discussed with the Western Front Association, into whose custody the majority of the cards have now been transferred. The women's cards have been passed to the IWM.

Front-line Fitness

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many (a) male and (b) female (i) officers and (ii)other ranks have been declared unfit for front line duty in the (A) Army, (B) Royal Navy, (C) Royal Air Force and (D) Royal Marines in each year since 1997. [6994]

Data on the number of downgraded personnel are not available prior to 2002. Available statistics on medical downgrading are shown in the following table. This table shows all personnel who are not fully deployable. Some personnel are classified as having limited deployability, so may be deployed overseas and make a contribution to deployed operational capability.

Trained UK regular forces: numbers medically downgraded by gender -- Number(36)

1 April 2002 1 April 2003

Total

Male

Female(37)

Total

Male

Female(37)

Officers

Royal Navy(38)

(39)

(39)

(39)

250

200

50

Royal Marines(38)(39)

(39)

(39)

(41)

20

20

(41)

Army(42)

(39)

(39)

(39)

(39)

(39)

(39)

Royal Air Force

520

390

120

580

420

160

Other Ranks

Royal Navy(38)

(39)

(39)

(39)

2,090

1,690

400

Royal Marines(38)

(39)

(39)

(39)

540

540

10

Army

9,450

8,270

1,190

10,290

9,010

1,280

Royal Air Force

3,350

2,690

660

3,560

2,840

720

1 April 2004 1 January 2005

Total

Male

Female(37)

Total

Male

Female(37)

Officers

Royal Navy(38)

260

210

60

280

210

60

Royal Marines(38)(39)

20

20

(41)

10

10

(41)

Army(42)

(39)

(39)

(39)

1,020

820

200

Royal Air Force

590

430

160

580

420

160

Other Ranks

Royal Navy(38)

2,370

1,910

460

2,340

1,860

480

Royal Marines(38)

710

700

10

600

600

10

Army

11,720

10,250

1,460

12,970

11,420

1,560

Royal Air Force

3,760

2,980

780

3,860

3,040

820

(36)UK regular forces includes nursing services and excludes full-time reserve service personnel, Gurkhas, the home service battalions of the Royal Irish Regiment, mobilised reservists and naval activated reservists.

(37)Female downgrades include personnel medically downgraded due to pregnancy.

(38)Data for medically downgraded personnel within the Royal Navy and Royal Marines are not available prior to April 2003.

(39)Denotes not available

(40)There are no female Royal Marine officers.

(41)Denotes not applicable

(42)Army officer data are not available prior to August 2004 due to inaccurate classification of a high proportion of untrained and newly trained officers.

Note:

1.All figures have been rounded to the nearest 10.

2.Due to the rounding methods used, figures may not always equal the sum of the parts.

3.When rounding to the nearest 10, numbers ending in 5 have been rounded to the nearest multiple of 20 to prevent systematic bias.

Source:

DASA (Tri-Service)

Iraq

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment his Department has made of lessons to be learned on the provision of appropriate and adequate security arrangements by UK troops in Iraq from the experiences at Camp Breadbasket; and if he will make a statement. [2717]

The Ministry of Defence constantly reviews its security arrangements in the light of lessons learned on operations. In the case of Breadbasket, the Chief of the General Staff, General Sir Mike Jackson, has appointed a senior military officer to assess what lessons might be learned. It is intended to publish the findings once all the trials of alleged deliberate abuse of Iraqis have been completed.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what discussions he or his officials have had with the United States about the future withdrawal of troops from Iraq; and if he will make a statement. [6933]

I hold regular discussions with our coalition partners, including the United States, about progress in establishing a free, stable and democratic Iraq. We have made it very clear during these discussions that the United Kingdom is committed to Iraq for as long as the Iraqi Government judge that the coalition is required to provide security and to assist the Iraqi Security Forces.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans there are for handing back provinces within Multinational Division (South Central)'s Area of Responsibility to Iraqi security forces' command and control. [7604]

Transitional issues in Multinational Division (Centre-South) are a matter for Poland as the framework nation for this area. Coalition forces across Iraq are working closely with the Iraqi Transitional Government and the Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) to ensure that the ISF have the necessary capability and capacity to take control of security in all areas of Iraq as soon as possible.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has for operational control of areas of Multinational Division (South Central)'s Area of Responsibility once Polish forces withdraw from Iraq. [7605]

We currently have no plans to deploy UK forces to MND (Centre-South) or other areas outside the boundaries of the UK's present area of responsibility in Multinational Division (South East).

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many representations have been made to UK military authorities in Iraq by prisoners of war of (a) Iraqi and (b) other nationality in relation to rights under article 78 of the third Geneva convention. [7901]

The United Kingdom does not hold any Prisoners of War in Iraq. The UK holds a number of security internees at the Divisional Temporary Detention Facility (DTDF) in Southern Iraq. The conditions of internment of security internees are governed by Geneva convention IV. Article 101 of Geneva convention IV covers the rights of internees to express complaints about their conditions of internment.

Security internees regularly make representations regarding their conditions of internment. Such representations are generally made directly with the staff at the DTDF and are not held centrally. They are taken seriously, and reasonable requests from internees, for example for changes to the menu, are accommodated where possible. Internees also have the right to make representations to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) about any issue related to their internment. The ICRC have regular and unrestricted access to the DTDF and to all internees held there.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the legal basis for the bombing of Iraq by RAF aircraft in the second half of 2002 was; and what proportion of ordnance was released in response to actual or imminent attack. [7262]

holding answer 28 June 2005

The legal basis for the operation of the No Fly Zones over Iraq was the need to avert an immediate and overwhelming humanitarian catastrophe threatened by the then Iraqi Government against the people living on the ground in those zones. This was combined with a need to monitor the effect of UNSCR 688 which demanded that Saddam Hussein cease the repression of his people. RAF aircraft attacked only targets which were an actual or imminent threat to coalition aircraft or were contributing to such a threat, namely air defence related assets. Thus, all the ordnance released was in response to an actual or imminent attack on coalition forces.

Jet Pilots (Flying Hours)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has made of effects on cost of the temporary reduction in the monthly flying hours for RAF fast jet pilots from 17.5 hours to 16.5 hours during 2005–06. [7889]

About £20 million will be saved as a result of the temporary reduction of average monthly flying hours for RAF fast jet pilots from 17.5 to 16.5hours a month in 2005–06.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether he plans to increase flying hours for RAF fast jet pilots to 17.5 hours per month. [7891]

Joint Strike Fighter

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list, with dates, those occasions when UK Government Ministers have discussed with the US Administration issues relating to technology transfer on the Joint Strike Fighter project. [6833]

Regular discussions take place at all levels with the US Administration on all aspects of JSF including technology transfer. MOD and other Ministers continue to raise this issue during their discussions with key members of the US Administration.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether full technology transfer on the Joint Strike Fighter project is a prerequisite for the UK remaining a part of this programme; and if he will make a statement. [6835]

The Ministry of Defence has set out the information access required to enable the United Kingdom to operate, sustain and upgrade the Joint Strike Fighter. Negotiations are at an early stage, and the United States understands that these issues will be a key consideration as the UK makes further commitments in the Joint Strike Fighter programme.

Joint US Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence in how many joint operations with US forces UK aircraft have been involved since May 2003. [6889]

British fast jet aircraft have been deployed on two major coalition operations alongside US forces in the wider middle east—Operation Telic, concentrated in Iraq, and Operation Herrick, in Afghanistan. In the conduct of these wider operations, numerous smaller operations are routinely undertaken by US and UK forces working together.

Kosovo (Troop Deployment)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has to send additional troops to Kosovo in 2005; and if he will make a statement. [8365]

The United Kingdom has no plans to send additional troops to Kosovo in 2005.

The UK contributes some 180 troops to the NATO operation in Kosovo. In addition we provide a battalion to the Balkans-wide over the horizon operational reserve force, along with Germany and Italy. Should NATO request the deployment of this asset to Kosovo the UK would respond accordingly, just as we did in March 2004 and March 2005.

Nuclear Submarines

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the incidents resulting in spillages of radioactive material during recent work on Vanguard class submarines. [6795]

On 7 and 10 June 2005, during the preliminary commissioning of the Primary Circuit Decontamination (PCD) facility, which will be used during the Long Overhaul Period (Refuel) of HMS Victorious at Devonport, two small leakages of water occurred. Some parts of the equipment had previously been used in the overhaul of another nuclear-powered submarine and, as a result, the water contained very low levels of radioactivity, barely above background levels. The water was contained within the dry dock and no radioactivity was released to the environment.

Nuclear safety remains of paramount importance and while these incidents were minor and did not present any hazard to the workforce or to the public, they could have been avoided. For this reason, the Environment Agency served an Enforcement Notice on the nuclear site licensee, Devonport Royal Dockyard Ltd. (who trade as Devonport Management Ltd.), which required the company to review and, where appropriate, improve the arrangements for controlling the release of radioactive waste to the environment. Accordingly, DRDL suspended PCD commissioning activities. These recommenced on 23 June 2005 once the recommendations from the review had been implemented. The PCD equipment is not due to be connected to HMS Victorious for some weeks and there should therefore be no long term impact on her programme.

Official Residences

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans his Department has to dispose of official residential properties. [6182]

holding answer 27 June 2005

There are currently 37 posts worldwide that attract Official Service Residences (OSRs) status as a result of hosting and entertainment duties. Although the number of posts attracting this status is kept under constant review, there are currently no plans to change the present number of posts attracting OSR status.

Two of the properties currently occupied by OSR status post holders have been identified for eventual disposal. The two post holders concerned would be transferred, if necessary, into alternative accommodation befitting the entitlement of the occupant and OSR status.

RAF (Staff Levels)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the staff levels against targets are for RAF (a) aircrew, (b) weapons systems operators, (c) ground crew, (d) technicians and intelligence staff. [7890]

As at 1 May 2005 the following staff levels (trained strength) against targets (requirement) were reported.

Trained strength

Requirement

Surplus/deficit

Junior officer aircrew

1,435

1,555

-120

Junior officer weapons system

operators

630

660

-30

Junior officer ground crew

70

60

+10

Squadron leader flying branch

705

720

-15

Technicians and intelligence

1,635

1,735

-100

Note:

Figures are rounded to the nearest 5.

RAF Menwith Hill

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many (a) US Army, (b) US Navy, (c) US Marines, (d) US Airforce, (e) US civilians and (f) US contractors are working at RAF Menwith Hill. [7813]

As of 1 June 2005 there were: 202 US Army personnel, 103 US Navy personnel, 34 US marines, 178 US Air Force personnel, 269 US Department of Defense civilians and 536 US contractors working at RAF Menwith Hill.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many (a) GCHQ, (b) Ministry of Defence Police Agency, (c) Ministry of Defence Guarding Service, (d) Royal Air Force and (e) other UK personnel are working at RAF Menwith Hill. [7814]

As of 1 June 2005 there were 125 Ministry of Defence Police Agency personnel, 33 Ministry of Defence Guarding Service personnel, one Royal Air Force Officer and 231 other UK personnel working at RAF Menwith Hill. I am withholding the number of GCHQ personnel working at RAF Menwith Hill in accordance with Government policy of not commenting on intelligence matters.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the planned expansion of facilities at RAF Menwith Hill. [7815]

A master plan covering the long-term development of RAF Menwith Hill is in the process of being produced by a joint UK/US team at RAF Menwith Hill. In order to maintain the operational effectiveness of the station it will be necessary to improve some of the ageing infrastructure on the site. This may lead to the demolition of some older buildings and their replacement by expanded modern facilities that, wherever possible, will be more in keeping with the rural landscape. There are no plans to alter the station's current role and mission.

Royal Hospital Haslar

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much was spent on (a) maintenance and (b) capital costs at the Royal Hospital Haslar in 2003–04; and what the estimate is for each year to 2008. [7562]

The expenditure details requested in respect of the Royal Hospital Haslar are as follows:

£ million

Maintenance

Capital

2003–04

2.1

0.3

2004–05(43)

2.1

2.0

2005–06(43)

2.2

0.2

2006–07(43)

2.2

0.2

2007–08(43)

0

0

(43)Estimated

The 2004–05 expenditure figures are shown as estimated because they are still subject to final audit by the National Audit Office. The estimate of nil expenditure for 2007–08 is due to the Ministry of Defence's planned withdrawal from management of the Royal Hospital Haslar site by 31 March 2007.

Work-related Stress

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many cases of work-related stress have been reported in his Department in each of the last three years; how much compensation was paid to employees in each year; how many work days were lost due to work-related stress in each year; at what cost; what procedures have been put in place to reduce work-related stress; at what cost; and if he will make a statement. [7859]

Ministry of Defence records on sickness absence for civilian employees do not distinguish between work related and non-work related stress. There are no centrally collated data recorded on work-related stress for Service personnel. The information requested on the number of cases, the numbers of days lost, and the cost of those working days due to work-related stress is not therefore available.

The compensation paid to MOD employees (service and civilian), for work- related stress, in each of the last three financial years was:

£000

2002–03

10,568

2003–04

61,594

2004–05

226,730

The MOD has over the last three years operated a stress policy laid down in Joint Service Publication 375. This publication can be found on the internet, at http://www.mod.uk/dsef/ohs/jsp375.htm. This policy is supplemented by procedures that were designed to assist with stress reduction when identified in an individual, these procedures are:

Confidential advice from a member of the Occupational Welfare Service.

Time off for medical appointments and treatment.

Reasonable adjustments to hours of work and the nature on individual's duties

Early involvement and support from our Occupational Health experts.

Gradual rehabilitation including reduced hours and duties.

A comprehensive suite of work/life policies.

The MOD does not hold centrally records on the cost of take-up of the stress related procedures.

EDUCATION AND SKILLS

A/AS Level Exams

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what steps her Department has taken to reduce the assessment burden at A and AS level. [8474]

As our white paper on the 14–19 reform states; we plan to move from 6 to 4-units of assessment for A level. This will reduce the assessment burden at advanced level by as much as a third and substantially reduce the cost on schools and colleges. This is purely about reducing assessment; there will be no reduction in A level content or standard.

We have also asked QCA to consider the burden of coursework in individual subjects and the cumulative effect across A level when they accredit new specifications.

Antisocial Behaviour

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what data on antisocial behaviour is collected by her Department relating to (a) primary schools, (b) secondary schools and (c) colleges of further and higher education. [8359]

The Department does not collect data from schools and colleges on antisocial behaviour. We do, however, collect data on exclusions from primary and secondary schools, although the numbers of exclusions do not necessarily reflect the levels of antisocial behaviour in schools. The last set of data on exclusions was published on 23 June and a copy of this publication is in the Library.

Ofsted report that in 2003/04 behaviour was satisfactory or better in 90 per cent. of secondary schools and 99 per cent. of primary schools.

The Department does not collect any data about antisocial behaviour from colleges of further and higher education.

Building Schools for the Future

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of the capital costs of building new (a) schools that offer A-levels under the Building Schools for the Future programme and (b) colleges that predominantly serve 16 to 19-year-olds was financed by her Department in the last year for which figures are available. [2599]

Information on the funding contributions to be made by local authorities to schools in the Building Schools for the Future programme is not held by the department. Local authorities are free to make their own investment decisions in accordance with their asset management plans. Total capital funding of around £2.2 billion per year to 2007–08 has been committed as part of Building Schools for the Future and this will benefit 47 schools that offer A-levels in the first wave (2005–06) of the programme. This information is not yet available for waves 2 and 3.

The Learning and Skills Council administers funding for Further Education capital projects and contributes grant aid towards the costs. Assessments of the appropriate level of contribution are made against affordability criteria. Levels of grant support vary from around 10–50 per cent. of the total project costs, with an average of 35 per cent.

Burnley College

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if her Department will provide funding to relocate Burnley College. [2596]

The Learning and Skills Council (LSC) determines the appropriate level of funding for capital projects in further education colleges from the funds allocated to it by the Department for capital investment in the post-16 learning and skills sector, including relocation.

This is an operational matter for the LSC. Mark Haysom, the Council's Chief Executive, will write to my hon. Friend on this matter. A copy of his reply will be placed in the House Library.

Letter from Mark Haysom to Kitty Ussher, dated 22 June 2005

I am writing to you following Jacqui Smith's reply of 30 June to your question regarding funding to support the relocation of Burnley College. As the Minister said this is an operational matter for the LSC.

The LSC has been in discussion with Burnley College regarding its accommodation strategy for some time and the LSC has supported two feasibility studies into the relocation of the college to the amount of £66,000. Regular discussions are taking place involving the college and its property consultants, LSC Lancashire and the regional capital adviser to support the development of a formal proposal.

As I am sure you will appreciate, the LSC has finite capital resources and demand for support is extremely high. To manage this the LSC has developed a set of criteria including consideration of space utilisation, value for money and affordability. This is essential if the LSC is to ensure that limited resources are used in the most cost effective manner. It is only possible to consider these criteria against detailed proposals. Such proposals have not, as yet been submitted by the college but LSC Lancashire has acknowledged the urgent need for a new building on a new site in Burnley as a priority. Once formal proposals have been received full consideration will be given to them against the above criteria.

Child Review 2004

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills

(1) what progress there has been on the commitment in the Child Review 2004 to review the way in which education formulae operate in relation to schools in deprived areas; [6780]

(2) what the spending per pupil was in (a) the 10 per cent. least deprived authorities and (b) the 10 per cent. most deprived authorities in (i) 1997, (ii) 2002–03, (iii)2003–04 and (iv) 2004–05' [6781]

(3) what the percentage difference in spending per pupil between the 10 per cent. most deprived authorities and the 10 per cent. least deprived authorities was in (a) 1997, (b) 2002–03, (c) 2003–04 and (d) 2004–05. [6782]

holding answer 23 June 2005

The Government target additional resource to authorities where there are higher numbers of pupils living in deprived circumstances because these pupils are more likely to have additional educational needs, and they will require higher levels of funding if they are to have equality of opportunity. At national level, the formula for distributing funding for schools to local authorities comprises a basic entitlement for each pupil of the same age, which is the same across the country, plus top-ups reflecting the relative needs of each area, including a top-up for each pupil with additional educational needs. (The other top-ups are for higher area costs in some areas and sparsity in others). In addition, some specific grants such as Excellence in Cities have been directed towards deprived areas.

The funding that individual schools receive in their budget shares is a matter for local authorities through their local funding formulae. Each authority's local formula should direct resources according to the relative needs of the schools in the area and their pupils. Work on the joint HM Treasury/Department for Education and Skills review of the ways in which local education authorities fund schools for the effects of social deprivation started in the autumn of 2004. The collection of evidence from stakeholders and drafting of the report is largely complete and the review will be published when conclusions have been finalised. As stated in the Child Poverty Review document published in July 2004, those conclusions will need to recognise the priority of maintaining stability and predictability in school funding, while ensuring that funds are accurately targeted according to need.

The table sets out the spending figures for the least and most deprived authorities for 1997–98, 1998–99, 2002–03 and 2003–04. Figures for 2004–05 are not yet available. The figures reflect the Government's commitment to fund adequately pupils living in deprived circumstances.

The figures given include those for 1998–99 because those figures are more comparable with later years. That is because spending in 1997–98 reflected the transfer of monies from local government to central Government for the nursery vouchers scheme: these were returned to local government from 1998–99. Also, because of local government reorganisation some authorities included in the calculations have only existed in their current form since 1998–99.

Combined LEA and school based expenditure per pupilCash terms figures as reported by LEAs as at 22 June 2005(1)(2)

In the top 10 per cent. least deprived local authorities(£)(3) In the top 10 per cent. most deprived local authorities(£)(3) Percentage difference(4)

(a)

(b)

(c)

1997–98(5)

2,670

3,390

27.3

1998–99

2,760

3,580

29.5

2002–03

3,270

4,230

29.2

2003–04

3,680

4,850

32.0

2004–05(6)

(1)The combined LEA and school based expenditure includes all expenditure on the education of children in LEA maintained establishments and pupils educated by the LEA other than in maintained establishments. This includes both school based expenditure and all elements of central LEA expenditure except youth and community and capital expenditure from revenue (CERA). Figures for 1997–98 and 1998–99 are drawn from the Revenue Outturn (RO1) spending returns which local authorities submitted to the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions. Figures for 2002–03 onwards are drawn from the Section 52 Outturn Statement (Table A) submitted to the DfES.

(2)Pupil figures include all pre-primary pupils, including those under-fives funded by the LEA and being educated in private settings, pupils educated in maintained mainstream schools and other LEA maintained pupils. The pupil data for pupils attending maintained nursery, primary, secondary and special schools are taken from the DfES Annual Schools Census. Private voluntary and independent (PVI) under-five pupil numbers are taken from the Early Years census but are only available since 1999–2000. Other LEA maintained pupils includes all pupils attending schools not maintained by the authority for whom the authority is paying full tuition fees, or educated otherwise than in schools and pupil referral units under arrangements made by the authority drawn from the Form 8b submitted to the DfES. Also included as other LEA maintained pupils are all pupils attending pupil referral units who are not registered at a maintained mainstream school drawn from the DfES Annual Schools Census. All pupil numbers are adjusted to be on a financial year basis.

(3)The AEN Index used in the allocation of Education Formula Spending Shares to LEAs in 2004–05 is used to identify the top and bottom 10 per cent. most deprived local authorities in 2003 and these LEAs have been compared over the years listed in the above table. The Index is calculated using the percentage of children in families in receipt of income support, job seekers allowance and working families tax credit, the percentage of primary pupils with mother tongue other than English and of secondary pupils from low achieving ethnic groups. However, due to local government reorganisation on 1 April 1998, five LEAs included in the 10 per cent. least deprived LEAs and did not exist in 1997–98 and have therefore been excluded for this year.

(4)The percentage difference is defined as the difference between spending per pupil in the 10 per cent. most deprived LEAs and 10 per cent. least deprived LEAs as a percentage of spending per pupil in the 10 per cent. least deprived LEAs (i.e. (column (b)—column (a))/(column (a)).

(5)Spending in 1997–98 reflects the transfer of monies from local government to central Government for the nursery vouchers scheme. These were returned to local government from 1998–99.

(6)Expenditure data for 2004–05 are not due to be collected by the Department until October 2005.

Note:

Unit cost figures are rounded to the nearest 10.

City Academies

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answers of 6 June 2005, Official Report, column 331W and 21 June 2005, Official Report, column 191W, on city academies, how manylessons in city academies have been inspected by Ofsted in each year since the first city academy was opened. [7940]

The number of lessons in academies inspected by HMI since the first academy was opened is 386. This includes two formal Section 10 inspections of lessons at Greig city academy (December 2004) and Unity city academy (March 2005), as well as a number of monitoring visits. 203 lessons were inspected during 2004 and 183 lessons have been inspected, so far, for 2005.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what plans her Department has to open new academies in Coventry south. [7978]

My officials are currently in discussion about potential academy proposals in the north east and in the centre of Coventry. There are no academy proposals in the south of the authority at this time.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills

(1) what plans she has to evaluate the admissions policies of academies; [7980]

(2) what steps she is taking to ensure transparency and accountability in the admissions processes of academies. [7982]

Academy admission policies are agreed with the Secretary of State, in consultation with the local education authority, at an early stage during the establishment of an academy. Should an academy wish to change its admissions policy, it is required—through its funding agreement—to seek the Secretary of State's consent to any changes, after first having sought comments on the changes from the local education authority, local schools and any other relevant admissions authority.

Academies are also required to follow the School Admissions Code of Practice, admit pupils in accordance to the local education authority's co-ordinated admissions arrangements and take part in, and have regard to the advice of, the local education authority's Admissions Forum.

Given all of these requirements, we consider that the current processes already ensures full accountability and transparency and do not see a need to add any further requirements or undertake any separate evaluate the admissions policies of academies.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if she will make a statement on academies' obligations concerning applications from students with special educational needs. [7981]

Academies are fully inclusive schools and admit pupils with special educational needs (SEN) on an equal basis with other schools in the area and this is reflected in their admissions policies. Although academies are independent schools, they have regard to the SEN Code of Practice (2001) and statutory guidance on inclusion. This obligation forms part of the funding agreement between each academy and the Secretary of State.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if she will make a statement on teachers' representation on governing boards of academies. [7983]

Academies are independent schools and the composition of their governing bodies, therefore, are principally a matter for the governing bodies themselves. Governance is one of the areas in which we wish academies to innovate; the Department, therefore, prescribes the makeup of academy governing bodies as little as possible.

That said, we are keen, where appropriate, for there to be a wide and varied representation on all governing bodies, including representation from both teaching and non-teaching staff. The majority of academies, therefore, do have within their memorandum and articles of governance provision for the election or co-option of staff governors. The principals of academies also sit on the governing body.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what steps she has taken to protect teachers' rights in academies; and what further steps are planned. [7984]

Teachers who transfer to academies from predecessor schools have their existing pay and conditions of service protected under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 (TUPE). Academies are also required to ensure that all teachers they employ have access to the Teachers Pension Scheme and to comply with the statutory provisions underlying the scheme.

We also protect the professional standing of teachers in academies, by requiring that teachers employed at academies are qualified teachers within the meaning of the Education (School Teachers' Qualifications) (England) Regulations 2003 and that they meet the health standards set out in the Education (Health Standards)(England) Regulations 2003.

Education Funding (Birth Rates)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what assessment she has madeof the effect of falling birth rates on the funding that is required for (a) primary and (b) secondary schools. [8249]

The Department takes account of projected pupil numbers in assessing future spending pressures on schools. The majority of costs in schools are closely related to the number of pupils, but some costs relate more to the existence and functioning of the school. Pupil numbers in primary schools have been falling for some years and in secondary schools will be falling from now on.

Education Services (Worcestershire)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 28 June 2005 to the hon. Member for Stroud to Question ref 6816, what assessment she has made of the financial impact on Worcestershire local education authority of 443 pupils from the county receiving their schooling in Gloucestershire. [9071]

The school funding formula distributes resources to authorities on the basis of where pupils are counted on the school roll. The 443 Worcestershire pupils who are attending Gloucestershire schools will therefore attract funding, on a per pupil basis, into Gloucestershire LEA's schools formula spending share (SFSS). Nevertheless, Worcestershire retains some residual responsibility for pupils who reside in their area—e.g in relation to SEN statementing—and therefore Worcestershire's LEA formula spending share (LEAFSS) includes an element of funding which is based on pupils' residence.

Grandparents

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what assessment she has made of the proportion of child care provided by grandparents. [7934]

The Department collects information on the uptake, use of and demand for child care, including that provided by grandparents, via a series of surveys of parents and evaluation of initiatives such as Sure Start local programmes and neighbourhood nurseries.

These studies have shown that grandparents are a significant provider of informal child care (that provided by friends and relatives) and are often the 'glue' that holds different child care arrangements together.

The 2003 Families and Children Survey found that for children in couple families where the mother worked, the most common child care arrangement—after partner/ex-partner—was grandparents (26 per cent.). For children in lone parent families in which the mother worked, grandparents were the most common child care arrangement used (27 per cent.). The survey also found that child care provided by grandparents declined from 36 per cent. for 0 to 2-year-old children to 24 per cent. for 11 to 13-year-olds.

The Government recognise the major contribution that grandparents and other relatives play in child care. In order to support informal carers such as grandparents, Sure Start children's centres will provide support and drop-in facilities.

International GCSE

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills for what reasons maintained secondary schools are not permitted to enter pupils for the international mathematics GCSE examination. [7999]

For qualifications to be taught in the maintained sector they must be accredited by the QCA and approved for use under section 96 of the Learning and Skills Act 2000. The international GCSEs were designed primarily as qualifications for overseas candidates, and have not been put forward for accreditation. IGCSE in Mathematics therefore is not approved for use by pupils in maintained schools and is unlikely to be, since it is not currently aligned to the national curriculum programmes of study.

Leadership Group on Behaviour and Discipline

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 14 June 2005, Official Report, column 357W, on the leadership group on behaviour and discipline, what the costs were of the group's meeting in each year since it was established; and how often the group met. [8492]

The leadership group has met once, on 21 June 2005. The accommodation cost of that meeting was some £1,260. Group members are also entitled to the costs of travel and of supply cover. The total claimed thus far under that heading is some £340.

New Schools

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills

(1) pursuant to the answer of 14 June 2005, Official Report, column 360W, on new school provision, what criteria her Department will use to distribute the additional money to which she refers; [8485]

(2) pursuant to the answer of 14 June 2005, Official Report, column 360W, on new school provision, from which organisations her Department has received representations. [8486]

We have received bids from the majority of maintained boarding schools for the £5 million available through targeted capital funding for boarding provision. Schools were invited to bid for funding towards:

Significant building projects to increase boarding provision;

Significant building projects to make essential improvements in boarding accommodation to meet, for example, health and safety or commission for social care inspection or other statutory requirements;

Significant remedial or enhancement work to boarding buildings; and the provision of equipment vital to the operation of the school.

No decision has yet been reached on the allocation of the funding.

In relation to new provision of small schools, we have received representations from the human scale education movement. As I made clear in my previous reply, decisions about the establishment of new schools are taken locally.

Out-of-hours Learning

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 21 June 2005, Official Report, column 1012W, on out-of-hours learning, who monitors the extent to which the guidance on homework for school pupils set out in her Department's publication, Homework: Guidance for Primary and Secondary Schools is being followed by schools. [7941]

The homework guidance does not have statutory force; therefore it is for schools to make their own decisions in this area. Ofsted inspectors evaluate the extent to which homework is effectively used to reinforce and extend what is learned in school, and reflect their findings in their report on the school. Ofsted inspections in 2003/04 found that the use of homework was satisfactory or better in 91 per cent. of secondary schools and 97 per cent. of primary schools.

Prison Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the (a) 2003–04 budget and (b) 2003–04 expenditure was for prison education; and if she will make a statement. [8234]

Funding for prison education and training in 2003–04 was £97.2 million. Expenditure was £96.3 million.

Pupil Behaviour Programmes

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what arrangements her Department has made to give professional training on issues facing gay and lesbian pupils to those delivering the programme for improving pupil behaviour. [8247]

We are committed to countering all forms of discrimination in schools, including homophobia. To achieve that:

The anti-bullying charter for action specifically mentions homophobic bullying;

The comprehensive guidance we have given schools on countering bullying includes advice on dealing with homophobic bullying;

The training materials available to staff in schools through our national secondary strategy also cover homophobic bullying;

Secondary strategy behaviour and attendance consultants, of which there is at least one in every local education authority, and primary national strategy leads, have been closely involved in our national Make The Difference" anti-bullying conferences. These conferences included a close focus on countering homophobic bullying.

Pupil Exclusions

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many pupil exclusions there were in (a) primary and (b) secondary schools in each London borough in each of the last five years. [8300]

The information requested is shown in the following tables.

Number of pupils absent for at least one half day due to unauthorised absence, 2000 to 2004—maintained schools in England (excluding special schools and CTCs)

Primary

2000

2001

2002

LEA

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

London, City of

75

42.4

60

32.8

24

13.5

Camden

2,633

28.3

3,503

37.5

3,596

38.5

Greenwich

6,141

35.6

6,205

35.5

6,050

34.9

Hackney

5,187

34.7

5,422

36.7

5,121

34.5

Hammersmith and Fulham

2,588

31.0

1,867

24.1

2,057

25.6

Islington

4,206

32.4

4,265

32.2

4,443

33.9

Kensington and Chelsea

1,721

34.9

1,592

27.6

1,663

29.2

Lambeth

5,424

36.6

5,647

35.2

4,489

28.7

Lewisham

7,199

39.7

8,376

42.3

7,440

38.5

Southwark

7,713

42.2

7,912

41.7

8,816

43.9

Tower Hamlets

8,581

49.7

8,779

49.9

8,265

48.0

Wandsworth

3,035

21.1

2,841

19.9

2,680

19.0

Westminster, City of

2,623

35.2

2,481

29.4

2,505

28.7

Barking and Dagenham

5,758

38.2

5,602

36.9

6,124

40.6

Barnet

3,826

17.9

4,070

18.4

4,393

20.0

Bexley

2,286

13.4

1,861

10.2

2,098

11.4

Brent

3,971

21.2

3,198

17.4

3,262

17.4

Bromley

3,090

14.0

2,941

13.1

2,943

13.4

Croydon

4,156

16.2

4,829

18.1

4,704

17.8

Ealing

3,722

17.3

3,142

14.6

2,378

11.1

Enfield

6,444

29.5

6,559

28.8

7,149

30.6

Haringey

6,016

38.7

6,723

39.1

7,210

40.3

Harrow

3,145

17.8

2,782

16.1

2,274

13.5

Havering

1,414

7.9

1,573

8.7

1,727

9.8

Hillingdon

5,292

25.8

5,330

27.8

4,875

24.4

Hounslow

4,213

26.5

4,921

31.9

4,920

31.4

Kingston upon Thames

1,158

12.7

907

9.4

933

9.7

Merton

2,543

20.8

1,875

15.8

1,677

14.1

Newham

12,319

51.0

12,254

48.0

11,584

44.6

Redbridge

4,962

27.4

6,214

31.3

5,402

26.8

Richmond upon Thames

778

7.5

796

7.7

896

8.7

Sutton

1,636

12.7

1,839

14.6

1,794

14.1

Waltham Forest

4,192

23.0

4,286

22.9

3,289

18.1

Primary

2003

2004

LEA

Number absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

London, City of

0

0.0

25

14.2

Camden

2,874

30.8

2,691

28.6

Greenwich

6,674

38.1

6,254

35.9

Hackney

4,943

33.5

5,023

33.9

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,510

19.7

1,752

22.6

Islington

4,716

36.5

3,864

30.5

Kensington and Chelsea

1,505

26.4

1,108

19.1

Lambeth

5,348

31.7

4,996

29.9

Lewisham

6,753

34.6

7,151

36.6

Southwark

9,472

46.2

8,753

41.5

Tower Hamlets

8,173

46.8

8,364

47.5

Wandsworth

2,831

19.6

2,794

20.1

Westminster, City of

2,346

26.3

1,889

21.4

Barking and Dagenham

6,265

41.2

5,568

36.6

Barnet

4,318

19.4

5,328

24.1

Bexley

1,967

11.0

2,016

11.3

Brent

3,036

16.2

3,246

17.2

Bromley

3,180

14.5

4,405

20.6

Croydon

5,456

21.2

5,727

22.1

Ealing

2,166

10.1

2,490

11.8

Enfield

7,446

32.0

6,514

27.7

Haringey

7,351

40.2

6,455

35.4

Harrow

1,675

9.7

1,514

8.7

Havering

1,745

10.0

1,732

10.0

Hillingdon

4,370

22.1

4,207

21.7

Hounslow

5,539

35.7

5,373

34.9

Kingston upon Thames

834

8.7

950

10.0

Merton

1,640

14.9

1,355

12.1

Newham

9,962

38.3

7,389

28.7

Redbridge

5,377

26.7

5,745

29.1

Richmond upon Thames

1,150

10.9

1,576

14.5

Sutton

1,594

12.7

1,609

13.0

Waltham Forest

3,500

19.6

3,759

21.3

Secondary

2000

2001

2002

LEA

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

London, City of

0

0

0

Camden

1,774

20.5

2,093

24.2

1,985

22.8

Greenwich

2,818

22.3

3,345

26.0

3,715

28.6

Hackney

1,945

28.2

2,595

33.5

2,876

35.0

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,268

24.5

1,302

21.0

1,375

22.1

Islington

2,371

33.5

2,739

36.1

2,360

29.9

Kensington and Chelsea

1,080

34.6

1,077

34.4

925

30.0

Lambeth

1,418

19.9

1,674

23.4

1,746

24.3

Lewisham

4,224

38.8

4,595

40.8

4,474

43.4

Southwark

2,581

25.5

2,566

24.4

3,311

30.8

Tower Hamlets

5,567

42.2

5,592

41.5

5,831

42.9

Wandsworth

1,910

21.3

2,155

24.1

2,218

24.9

Westminster, City of

3,066

43.5

1,799

25.2

2,331

32.6

Barking and Dagenham

2,804

28.7

3,181

31.7

3,614

34.5

Barnet

2,601

15.2

3,148

17.6

3,939

22.1

Bexley

2,546

17.0

3,224

20.6

3,361

21.0

Brent

1,875

15.4

1,930

15.6

1,874

15.0

Bromley

2,030

11.8

3,519

19.9

3,188

17.6

Croydon

2,323

14.7

2,314

13.5

2,688

15.2

Ealing

2,062

15.4

2,804

20.7

2,545

18.5

Enfield

5,509

31.5

6,238

35.2

5,864

32.9

Haringey

2,697

26.3

2,786

30.0

4,150

37.5

Harrow

862

9.7

1,111

12.2

1,097

11.9

Havering

1,753

11.9

2,112

14.0

2,101

13.7

Hillingdon

3,434

24.8

3,125

22.1

3,541

23.8

Hounslow

1,866

13.6

1,681

12.1

2,494

18.2

Kingston upon Thames

1,280

17.9

997

13.6

1,143

15.3

Merton

2,168

28.5

2,156

28.9

2,106

29.2

Newham

7,622

43.7

7,831

44.5

7,363

41.5

Redbridge

1,654

10.8

2,072

13.7

2,800

18.2

Richmond upon Thames

1,478

19.2

2,332

30.1

2,700

35.7

Sutton

1,026

8.8

1,512

12.4

2,106

17.0

Waltham Forest

3,476

27.5

3,715

28.9

3,749

28.5

Secondary

2003

2004

LEA

Number absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

London, City of

0

0

Camden

1,755

23.2

1,628

21.6

Greenwich

4,426

33.5

4,913

36.9

Hackney

2,112

26.2

2,727

37.6

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,492

23.7

1,580

25.6

Islington

2,811

35.2

2,876

36.1

Kensington and Chelsea

890

28.8

568

18.3

Lambeth

1,685

23.2

870

11.5

Lewisham

4,137

36.6

5,340

47.2

Southwark

3,897

35.6

2,831

25.2

Tower Hamlets

6,501

48.2

6,186

45.6

Wandsworth

2,322

25.7

1,705

21.6

Westminster, City of

2,992

41.4

3,302

44.7

Barking and Dagenham

3,851

35.4

4,019

35.5

Barnet

3,324

18.5

4,090

23.4

Bexley

2,944

18.8

3,556

21.1

Brent

2,705

19.8

2,240

16.1

Bromley

4,302

23.8

3,428

18.7

Croydon

4,733

26.2

3,931

21.9

Ealing

2,279

16.3

2,990

21.3

Enfield

6,443

35.2

8,062

42.7

Haringey

4,666

41.7

4,325

38.2

Harrow

1,125

12.1

1,100

11.8

Havering

1,993

12.8

2,237

14.2

Hillingdon

4,729

31.4

4,992

31.9

Hounslow

2,317

16.5

3,074

22.0

Kingston upon Thames

845

11.1

724

10.8

Merton

2,295

27.8

2,073

25.2

Newham

6,969

38.3

6,367

35.0

Redbridge

2,630

16.6

4,203

26.3

Richmond upon Thames

2,419

31.8

2,737

35.9

Sutton

1,938

15.1

2,518

19.2

Waltham Forest

3,316

24.9

5,012

36.6

'—'=not applicable

School Bullying

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many schools did not have a school bullying policy in place in 2004–05. [8469]

All schools are required, under section61 of the School Standards Framework Act 1998, to have an anti-bullying policy in place.

We are not aware of any schools which do not comply with this requirement.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 7 June 2005, Official Report, column 471W, on bullying, if she will list the items of research to which she refers. [8479]

The information requested is as follows.

Impact of bullying on truancy

Dalziel and Henthorne (2005) Parents'/Carers' Attitudes Towards School Attendance" DfES Research Report RR618

http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR618.pdf

Malcolm, Wilson, Davidson and Kirk (2003) Absence from School: A Study of its Causes and Effects in Seven LEAs" DfES Research Report RR 424

http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR424.pdf

Impact of bullying on exclusions

DfES (2005) Permanent and Fixed Period Exclusions from Schools and Exclusion Appeals in England, 2003/04" National Statistics First Release SFR 23/2005 http://www.dfes.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000582/SFR23–2005.pdf

MORI (2004) MORI Youth Survey 2004" Youth Justice Board for England and Wales http://www.youth-justice-board.gov.uk/Publications/Scripts/fileDownload.asp?file=YouthSurvey2004.pdf

Armstrong et al (2005) Children, risk and crime: the On Track Youth Lifestyles Surveys" Home Office Research Study 278

http://uk.sitestat.com/homeoffice/homeoffice/s?rds.hors278pdf&ns_type=pdf&ns_url=%5Bhttp://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs05/hors278.pdf%5D

Impact of bullying on participation in further and higher education

Kidscape (1999) Kidscape Survey: Long-term Effects of Bullying"

http://www.kidscape.org.uk/assets/downloads/kslongtermeffects.pdf'>http://www.kidscape.org.uk/assets/downloads/kslongtermeffects.pdf

Impact of bullying on the incidence of self-harm and suicide

Kidscape (1999) Kidscape Survey: Long-term Effects of Bullying"

http://www.kidscape.org.uk/assets/downloads/kslongtermeffects.pdf'>http://www.kidscape.org.uk/assets/downloads/kslongtermeffects.pdf

Rivers, (2004) Recollections of Bullying at School and their Long-Term Implications for Lesbians, Gay men and Bisexuals" Crisis Vol. 25 (4)

Tackling bullying

Warwick, Chase and Aggleton with Sanders (2004) Homophobia, Sexual Orientation and Schools: A Review and Implications for Action" DfES Research Report RR594

http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR594.pdf

Smith and Sumara (2003) Evaluation of the DfES Anti-Bullying Pack" DfES Research Brief RBX06–03

http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RBX06–03.pdf

Oliver and Candappa (2003) Tackling Bullying: Listening to the Views of Children and Young People" DfES Research Report RR400

http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR400.pdf

School Maintenance

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much was spent on maintenance and improvement of (a) primary and junior schools and (b) secondary schools in (i) West Sussex, (ii) Kent, (iii) Durham, (iv) East Riding of Yorkshire and (v) each English county in each of the last eight years. [7967]

Expenditure on maintenance and improvement of(a) primary and junior schools and (b) secondary schools is determined by local authorities and schools in accordance with their local asset management plans.

School capital allocations to local authorities and schools in (i) West Sussex, (ii) Kent, (iii) Durham, (iv) East Riding of Yorkshire and (v) each English county in each of the last eight years are set out in the following table:

£000

LEA name

1998–99

1999–2000

2000–01

2001–02

2002–03

2003–04

2004–05

2005–06

Bedfordshire

6,261

7,230

16,740

38,402

18,638

18,359

20,621

16,250

Buckinghamshire

9,318

13,072

21,116

14,017

20,627

27,460

26,443

21,050

Cambridgeshire

11,955

12,294

23,939

22,241

27,974

38,682

33,212

24,598

Cheshire

9,784

15,337

27,912

34,224

24,973

34,224

30,488

26,288

Cornwall

10,910

11,621

81,513

19,029

28,239

99,602

33,273

20,003

Cumbria

7,750

10,412

19,703

16,447

23,174

21,193

23,723

19,005

Derbyshire

12,965

13,855

27,405

50,596

37,530

74,516

41,778

32,577

Devon

13,202

16,841

27,336

26,658

46,619

122,740

56,137

24,973

Dorset

8,405

7,256

13,247

11,596

21,935

22,855

16,276

18,929

Durham

11,525

12,308

19,777

17,459

27,059

33,035

25,282

25,815

East Riding of Yorkshire

5,218

36,964

16,235

11,208

16,181

20,432

21,642

16,997

East Sussex

15,093

30,258

18,149

16,146

23,932

24,402

23,721

17,703

Essex

15,510

21,928

57,317

41,770

84,492

63,462

63,202

55,618

Gloucestershire

7,019

12,942

26,870

24,170

27,563

28,486

36,782

30,157

Hampshire

22,054

19,190

43,116

38,118

54,428

70,786

62,874

50,882

Hertfordshire

14,850

15,183

36,733

26,531

47,413

43,353

60,759

63,764

Kent

23,174

21,598

63,044

48,222

73,151

92,848

181,101

90,461

Lancashire

19,457

36,807

42,300

36,021

55,453

62,607

44,234

38,054

Leicestershire

6,503

9,232

20,957

15,831

25,401

27,582

33,834

22,867

Lincolnshire

6,310

9,702

26,968

39,013

26,928

28,157

33,779

29,340

Norfolk

10,815

12,089

28,303

25,472

130,152

39,292

108,282

34,457

North Yorkshire

8,500

11,250

31,470

18,919

26,946

34,086

27,377

21,993

Northamptonshire

15,394

12,308

26,802

22,935

56,011

130,466

36,015

25,035

Northumberland

4,654

6,174

15,496

9,461

12,875

13,730

15,920

11,700

Nottinghamshire

10,105

16,391

45,404

29,005

33,779

157,700

31,112

26,170

Oxfordshire

11,779

13,814

24,973

26,822

33,687

33,394

36,896

36,243

Somerset

8,765

9,188

18,148

17,621

20,049

19,249

21,831

18,212

Staffordshire

28,435

18,549

34,145

27,479

32,905

35,529

41,071

29,194

Surrey

16,986

14,101

33,113

28,529

39,836

48,336

45,928

38,278

Warwickshire

6,414

7,339

17,511

14,143

23,787

34,454

25,499

19,169

West Sussex

10,922

9,990

21,593

19,101

86,759

30,799

34,381

36,014

Wiltshire

7,572

7,221

54,228

12,083

19,349

27,615

21,251

15,740

Worcestershire

9,658

12,554

26,799

17,884

26,086

24,264

88,860

19,602

Revenue expenditure figures on the maintenance and improvement of schools are likely to vary from year to year depending on the unique circumstances of a particular LEA. For example, revenue expenditure will increase in years where there have been adverse weather conditions (e.g. repairing storm damage) and is also likely to vary with the number and age of the school buildings within the LEA. Revenue expenditure will also be affected by the amounts of capital allocated to each school.

The available information is contained within the following table:

Maintenance and improvement of school buildings and grounds since 1998 -- £000(7)(8)(9)(10)

1998–99(7)

Pre-primary and

primary education

Secondary education

Bedfordshire

1,311

3,197

Buckinghamshire

3,843

3,305

Cambridgeshire

3,689

2,051

Cheshire

4,729

3,451

Cornwall

4,932

4,448

Cumbria

4,647

3,033

Derbyshire

4,999

3,745

Devon

4,711

2,708

Dorset

1,553

1,864

Durham

4,645

3,380

East Riding of Yorkshire

1,854

2,143

East Sussex

2,054

2,252

Essex

7,248

3,007

Gloucestershire

3,171

797

Hampshire

7,634

5,569

Hertfordshire

4,820

4,088

Kent

4,097

1,958

Lancashire

6,078

4,360

Leicestershire

3,486

4,157

Lincolnshire

2,151

1,318

Norfolk

4,085

4,135

North Yorkshire

3,071

3,787

Northamptonshire

3,356

2,095

Northumberland

2,188

2,516

Nottinghamshire

3,805

4,076

Oxfordshire

1,416

1,175

Shropshire

1,631

1,906

Somerset

896

1,598

Staffordshire

2,709

3,623

Surrey

2,916

1,845

Warwickshire

2,499

1,644

West Sussex

3,647

3,390

Wiltshire

1,815

804

Worcestershire

2,659

2,429

1999–2000 -- £000

Pre-primary

Primary education

Pre-primary and primary education

Secondary education

Bedfordshire

13

0

13

0

Buckinghamshire

6

2,172

2,178

2,774

Cambridgeshire

22

2,608

2,630

2,054

Cheshire

21

4,495

4,516

4,486

Cornwall

8

2,756

2,764

2,410

Cumbria

65

1,802

1,867

2,181

Derbyshire

32

2,182

2,214

1,758

Devon

22

5,285

5,306

3,206

Dorset

1

949

949

1,759

Durham

215

2,519

2,733

2,355

East Riding of Yorkshire

108

1,459

1,566

1,673

East Sussex

0

2,327

2,327

1,915

Essex

16

5,405

5,421

5,668

Gloucestershire

9

5,182

5,191

5,273

Hampshire

11

6,091

6,102

5,901

Hertfordshire

94

5,673

5,768

5,248

Kent

3

5,903

5,907

7,209

Lancashire

237

8,317

8,554

6,396

Leicestershire

0

2,713

2,713

4,342

Lincolnshire

40

2,773

2,813

2,199

Norfolk

15

3,621

3,636

3,704

North Yorkshire

19

3,389

3,408

4,067

Northamptonshire

34

3,865

3,898

3,388

Northumberland

2

2,349

2,350

2,699

Nottinghamshire

43

5,166

5,210

7,042

Oxfordshire

56

941

997

468

Shropshire

0

1,005

1,006

842

Somerset

3

623

626

1,269

Staffordshire

8

2,686

2,694

3,321

Surrey

35

3,589

3,625

2,896

Warwickshire

204

3,181

3,386

3,437

West Sussex

15

1,576

1,591

1,748

Wiltshire

0

1,802

1,802

1,687

Worcestershire

15

1,575

1,590

2,142

2000–01 -- £000

Pre-primary

Primary education

Pre-primary and primary education

Secondary education

Bedfordshire

0

309

309

598

Buckinghamshire

13

2,895

2,908

2,802

Cambridgeshire

106

3,260

3,366

2,631

Cheshire

6

4,426

4,431

3,359

Cornwall

9

1,038

1,047

1,060

Cumbria

68

3,638

3,706

3,899

Derbyshire

39

3,045

3,084

2,877

Devon

26

5,219

5,245

3,202

Dorset

1

1,498

1,499

2,192

Durham

259

3,033

3,292

2,268

East Riding of Yorkshire

51

2,088

2,139

2,269

East Sussex

0

2,173

2,173

2,452

Essex

9

8,256

8,265

8,692

Gloucestershire

15

3,794

3,809

5,287

Hampshire

26

6,024

6,050

6,221

Hertfordshire

107

5,586

5,693

5,405

Kent

32

4,924

4,956

11,351

Lancashire

178

9,122

9,300

6,347

Leicestershire

2

3,276

3,278

4,822

Lincolnshire

25

2,783

2,808

2,452

Norfolk

23

3,713

3,736

4,810

North Yorkshire

74

3,006

3,081

3,740

Northamptonshire

13

5,635

5,648

5,804

Northumberland

11

2,596

2,607

2,986

Nottinghamshire

34

3,857

3,891

4,720

Oxfordshire

41

263

304

90

Shropshire

0

980

980

863

Somerset

3

1,181

1,183

2,092

Staffordshire

10

3,003

3,013

3,341

Surrey

63

5,270

5,333

3,281

Warwickshire

242

2,491

2,734

2,484

West Sussex

33

3,539

3,572

1,806

Wiltshire

0

1,515

1,515

1,516

Worcestershire

4

123

127

143

2001–02 -- £000

Pre-primary

Primary education

Pre-primary and primary education

Secondary education

Bedfordshire

8

2,986

2,995

2,973

Buckinghamshire

12

2,767

2,779

3,045

Cambridgeshire

41

2,863

2,904

2,461

Cheshire

13

4,593

4,606

3,595

Cornwall

796

2,555

3,351

2,652

Cumbria

46

4,840

4,886

6,889

Derbyshire

56

2,802

2,858

2,571

Devon

16

6,088

6,104

4,181

Dorset

1

1,676

1,677

2,421

Durham

226

3,217

3,443

2,534

East Riding of Yorkshire

24

2,894

2,918

3,730

East Sussex

3

2,539

2,541

3,101

Essex

44

9,795

9,839

11,128

Gloucestershire

138

3,297

3,435

5,342

Hampshire

12

4,267

4,279

4,257

Hertfordshire

83

7,536

7,619

6,162

Kent

27

7,110

7,137

9,377

Lancashire

217

10,540

10,757

7,721

Leicestershire

10

3,387

3,396

5,794

Lincolnshire

5

1,585

1,591

2,077

Norfolk

11

4,839

4,850

4,119

North Yorkshire

79

3,024

3,103

3,243

Northamptonshire

11

4,275

4,286

3,700

Northumberland

1

2,561

2,562

2,854

Nottinghamshire

16

3,815

3,831

4,886

Oxfordshire

84

487

571

1,642

Shropshire

9

1,004

1,013

945

Somerset

3

2,252

2,255

2,002

Staffordshire

54

3,681

3,735

3,598

Surrey

10

4,767

4,777

4,697

Warwickshire

74

3,042

3,116

3,693

West Sussex

41

3,325

3,365

1,578

Wiltshire

0

980

980

716

Worcestershire

6

2,350

2,356

3,499

£000

2002–03(7) 2003–04(7)

Primary schools

Secondary schools

Primary schools

Secondary schools

Bedfordshire

1,526

2,607

1,473

2,272

Buckinghamshire

2,569

3,167

3,106

4,350

Cambridgeshire

2,539

1,884

2,731

2,552

Cheshire

3,621

3,201

3,446

3,783

Cornwall

2,987

3,539

2,973

3,627

Cumbria

4,147

3,272

2,173

2,946

Derbyshire

3,070

2,310

2,989

2,497

Devon

3,426

2,874

3,415

2,550

Dorset

1,594

1,972

1,589

2,251

Durham

2,578

2,089

2,149

2,948

East Riding of Yorkshire

1,440

1,291

1,191

1,045

East Sussex

1,721

1,865

1,453

1,879

Essex

8,475

8,474

8,560

8,121

Gloucestershire

2,284

2,755

2,510

2,667

Hampshire

7,405

6,545

7,757

6,943

Hertfordshire

5,026

5,427

4,308

5,241

Kent

5,949

8,228

5,639

7,754

Lancashire

11,262

7,079

12,261

7,576

Leicestershire

3,298

4,574

3,298

4,106

Lincolnshire

2,563

3,010

2,391

2,771

Norfolk

6,452

4,954

6,870

5,339

North Yorkshire

3,638

3,846

3,683

3,690

Northamptonshire

3,544

3,084

3,503

3,494

Northumberland

1,277

2,315

1,460

2,491

Nottinghamshire

3,452

4,273

3,551

4,130

Oxfordshire

3,418

3,960

3,291

4,204

Shropshire

964

872

986

858

Somerset

2,902

3,800

2,780

3,363

Staffordshire

2,572

3,050

2,311

3,073

Surrey

5,972

5,883

6,762

6,330

Warwickshire

2,746

2,560

2,947

2,585

West Sussex

3,884

3,889

4,183

4,311

Wiltshire

2,330

2,363

2,049

2,553

Worcestershire

2,241

3,674

2,037

3,106

(7)Denotes the change of source from LEAs education Revenue Outturn Statements submitted to ODPM to Section 52 Outturn Statements in 1999–00, and to the review of Section 52 categories in 2002–03 following the introduction of Consistent Financial Reporting (CFR) to schools.

(8)Figures for 1998–99 to 2001–02 cover the repair and maintenance of buildings, fixed plant and grounds which includes all expenditure on non-capital building works, including repairs and maintenance of buildings, and non-capital expenditure on fixed plant and grounds. Figures for 2002–03 and 2003–04 are the combination of the revenue expenditure on building (including fixed plant) maintenance and improvement and grounds maintenance and improvement categories (CFR categories E12+E13). Any capital expenditure on school buildings is not included in this table.

(9)Figures are provided for the six years to 2003–04, the latest year for which data are available. Data for 1997–98 and earlier are not available for comparable areas due to local government re-organisation. Figures for 2002–03 onwards will not be directly comparable with figures for earlier years as figures for 2002–03 and 2003–04 are not available and have therefore been excluded for these two years. Also, for some LEAs, expenditure that had previously been attributed to the schools sectors was reported within the LEA part of the Section 52 form in 2002–03 and 2003–04 and would therefore be excluded from the totals for

(10)Figures are rounded up to the nearest 1,000.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much funding is estimated as necessary for buildings maintenance in 2005–06 in (a) each school in Brent and (b) in each London borough. [8306]

Decisions on how much funding is needed for buildings maintenance in each school in Brent and each London borough are not made centrally but by local authorities and schools in accordance with their local asset management plans.

School Meals

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills when she expects the School Meal Review Panel to consider the nutritional standards that apply to school breakfasts. [8230]

The Department for Education and Skills will publish draft school lunch standards for public consultation this September, and the final version will become mandatory from September 2006. Once the draft school lunch standards have been published the panel will consider how the standards could be extended to apply to other food and drink provided on school premises.

Schools (Unauthorised Absence)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many pupils in each London borough missed at least half a day due to unauthorised absence in (a) primary schools, (b) secondary schools, (c) special schools and (d) pupil referral units, expressed as a percentage of pupils of compulsory school age in each of the last five years. [8059]

The information requested on the number of pupils with unauthorised absence in London boroughs for secondary, primary and special schools is shown in the following tables. Unauthorised absence includes all unexplained or unjustified absences, such as lateness, holidays during term time not authorised by the school, absence where reason is not yet established and truancy. The department does not currently collect absence data from pupil referral units, although we plan to do so in future, so this information cannot yet be provided.

Number of pupils absent for at least one half day due to unauthorised absence, 2000 to 2004—maintained schools in England (excluding CTCs)

Primary

2000

2001

2002

LEA

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

London, City of

75

42.4

60

32.8

24

13.5

Camden

2,633

28.3

3,503

37.5

3,596

38.5

Greenwich

6,141

35.6

6,205

35.5

6,050

34.9

Hackney

5,187

34.7

5,422

36.7

5,121

34.5

Hammersmith and Fulham

2,588

31.0

1,867

24.1

2,057

25.6

Islington

4,206

32.4

4,265

32.2

4,443

33.9

Kensington and Chelsea

1,721

34.9

1,592

27.6

1,663

29.2

Lambeth

5,424

36.6

5,647

35.2

4,489

28.7

Lewisham

7,199

39.7

8,376

42.3

7,440

38.5

Southwark

7,713

42.2

7,912

41.7

8,816

43.9

Tower Hamlets

8,581

49.7

8,779

49.9

8,265

48.0

Wandsworth

3,035

21.1

2,841

19.9

2,680

19.0

Westminster, City of

2,623

35.2

2,481

29.4

2,505

28.7

Barking and Dagenham

5,758

38.2

5,602

36.9

6,124

40.6

Barnet

3,826

17.9

4,070

18.4

4,393

20.0

Bexley

2,286

13.4

1,861

10.2

2,098

11.4

Brent

3,971

21.2

3,198

17.4

3,262

17.4

Bromley

3,090

14.0

2,941

13.1

2,943

13.4

Croydon

4,156

16.2

4,829

18.1

4,704

17.8

Ealing

3,722

17.3

3,142

14.6

2,378

11.1

Enfield

6,444

29.5

6,559

28.8

7,149

30.6

Haringey

6,016

38.7

6,723

39.1

7,210

40.3

Harrow

3,145

17.8

2,782

16.1

2,274

13.5

Havering

1,414

7.9

1,573

8.7

1,727

9.8

Hillingdon

5,292

25.8

5,330

27.8

4,875

24.4

Hounslow

4,213

26.5

4,921

31.9

4,920

31.4

Kingston upon Thames

1,158

12.7

907

9.4

933

9.7

Merton

2,543

20.8

1,875

15.8

1,677

14.1

Newham

12,319

51.0

12,254

48.0

11,584

44.6

Redbridge

4,962

27.4

6,214

31.3

5,402

26.8

Richmond upon Thames

778

7.5

796

7.7

896

8.7

Sutton

1,636

12.7

1,839

14.6

1,794

14.1

Waltham Forest

4,192

23.0

4,286

22.9

3,289

18.1

2003 2004

Number absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

London, City of

0

0.0

25

14.2

Camden

2,874

30.8

2,691

28.6

Greenwich

6,674

38.1

6,254

35.9

Hackney

4,943

33.5

5,023

33.9

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,510

19.7

1,752

22.6

Islington

4,716

36.5

3,864

30.5

Kensington and Chelsea

1,505

26.4

1,108

19.1

Lambeth

5,348

31.7

4,996

29.9

Lewisham

6,753

34.6

7,151

36.6

Southwark

9,472

46.2

8,753

41.5

Tower Hamlets

8,173

46.8

8,364

47.5

Wandsworth

2,831

19.6

2,794

20.1

Westminster, City of

2,346

26.3

1,889

21.4

Barking and Dagenham

6,265

41.2

5,568

36.6

Barnet

4,318

19.4

5,328

24.1

Bexley

1,967

11.0

2,016

11.3

Brent

3,036

16.2

3,246

17.2

Bromley

3,180

14.5

4,405

20.6

Croydon

5,456

21.2

5,727

22.1

Ealing

2,166

10.1

2,490

11.8

Enfield

7,446

32.0

6,514

27.7

Haringey

7,351

40.2

6,455

35.4

Harrow

1,675

9.7

1,514

8.7

Havering

1,745

10.0

1,732

10.0

Hillingdon

4,370

22.1

4,207

21.7

Hounslow

5,539

35.7

5,373

34.9

Kingston upon Thames

834

8.7

950

10.0

Merton

1,640

14.9

1,355

12.1

Newham

9,962

38.3

7,389

28.7

Redbridge

5,377

26.7

5,745

29.1

Richmond upon Thames

1,150

10.9

1,576

14.5

Sutton

1,594

12.7

1,609

13.0

Waltham Forest

3,500

19.6

3,759

21.3

Number of pupils ABS—maintained schools

Secondary

2000

2001

2002

LEA

Number

absent

As percentage of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of compulsory school age

London, City of

0

n/a

0

n/a

0

n/a

Camden

1,774

20.5

2,093

24.2

1,985

22.8

Greenwich

2,818

22.3

3,345

26.0

3,715

28.6

Hackney

1,945

28.2

2,595

33.5

2,876

35.0

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,268

24.5

1,302

21.0

1,375

22.1

Islington

2,371

33.5

2,739

36.1

2,360

29.9

Kensington and Chelsea

1,080

34.6

1,077

34.4

925

30.0

Lambeth

1,418

19.9

1,674

23.4

1,746

24.3

Lewisham

4,224

38.8

4,595

40.8

4,474

43.4

Southwark

2,581

25.5

2,566

24.4

3,311

30.8

Tower Hamlets

5,567

42.2

5,592

41.5

5,831

42.9

Wandsworth

1,910

21.3

2,155

24.1

2,218

24.9

Westminster, City of

3,066

43.5

1,799

25.2

2,331

32.6

Barking and Dagenham

2,804

28.7

3,181

31.7

3,614

34.5

Barnet

2,601

15.2

3,148

17.6

3,939

22.1

Bexley

2,546

17.0

3,224

20.6

3,361

21.0

Brent

1,875

15.4

1,930

15.6

1,874

15.0

Bromley

2,030

11.8

3,519

19.9

3,188

17.6

Croydon

2,323

14.7

2,314

13.5

2,688

15.2

Ealing

2,062

15.4

2,804

20.7

2,545

18.5

Enfield

5,509

31.5

6,238

35.2

5,864

32.9

Haringey

2,697

26.3

2,786

30.0

4,150

37.5

Harrow

862

9.7

1,111

12.2

1,097

11.9

Havering

1,753

11.9

2,112

14.0

2,101

13.7

Hillingdon

3,434

24.8

3,125

22.1

3,541

23.8

Hounslow

1,866

13.6

1,681

12.1

2,494

18.2

Kingston upon Thames

1,280

17.9

997

13.6

1,143

15.3

Merton

2,168

28.5

2,156

28.9

2,106

29.2

Newham

7,622

43.7

7,831

44.5

7,363

41.5

Redbridge

1,654

10.8

2,072

13.7

2,800

18.2

Richmond upon Thames

1,478

19.2

2,332

30.1

2,700

35.7

Sutton

1,026

8.8

1,512

12.4

2,106

17.0

Waltham Forest

3,476

27.5

3,715

28.9

3,749

28.5

2003 2004

Number absent

As percentage of compulsory school age

Number absent

As percentage of compulsory school age

London, City of

0

n/a

0

n/a

Camden

1,755

23.2

1,628

21.6

Greenwich

4,426

33.5

4,913

36.9

Hackney

2,112

26.2

2,727

37.6

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,492

23.7

1,580

25.6

Islington

2,811

35.2

2,876

36.1

Kensington and Chelsea

890

28.8

568

18.3

Lambeth

1,685

23.2

870

11.5

Lewisham

4,137

36.6

5,340

47.2

Southwark

3,897

35.6

2,831

25.2

Tower Hamlets

6,501

48.2

6,186

45.6

Wandsworth

2,322

25.7

1,705

21.6

Westminster, City of

2,992

41.4

3,302

44.7

Barking and Dagenham

3,851

35.4

4,019

35.5

Barnet

3,324

18.5

4,090

23.4

Bexley

2,944

18.8

3,556

21.1

Brent

2,705

19.8

2,240

16.1

Bromley

4,302

23.8

3,428

18.7

Croydon

4,733

26.2

3,931

21.9

Ealing

2,279

16.3

2,990

21.3

Enfield

6,443

35.2

8,062

42.7

Haringey

4,666

41.7

4,325

38.2

Harrow

1,125

12.1

1,100

11.8

Havering

1,993

12.8

2,237

14.2

Hillingdon

4,729

31.4

4,992

31.9

Hounslow

2,317

16.5

3,074

22.0

Kingston upon Thames

845

11.1

724

10.8

Merton

2,295

27.8

2,073

25.2

Newham

6,969

38.3

6,367

35.0

Redbridge

2,630

16.6

4,203

26.3

Richmond upon Thames

2,419

31.8

2,737

35.9

Sutton

1,938

15.1

2,518

19.2

Waltham Forest

3,316

24.9

5,012

36.6

n/a=not applicable

Number of pupils ABS—maintained schools

Specials

2000

2001

2002

Number

absent

As percentage of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of compulsory school age

London, City of

0

n/a

0

n/a

0

n/a

Camden

115

44.4

81

29.3

99

37.1

Greenwich

231

42.1

243

46.3

205

44.5

Hackney

181

56.9

223

60.1

175

46.5

Hammersmith and Fulham

84

28.5

79

26.3

68

22.8

Islington

89

37.9

116

51.6

24

11.3

Kensington and Chelsea

—;(11)

—;(11)

0

0.0

—;(11)

—;(11)

Lambeth

207

34.6

215

43.4

259

45.2

Lewisham

242

47.2

275

54.5

250

48.6

Southwark

131

32.0

214

50.6

218

48.4

Tower Hamlets

113

26.0

104

26.0

113

30.2

Wandsworth

233

40.0

254

44.3

225

40.1

Westminster, City of

66

48.2

33

25.4

31

24.2

Barking and Dagenham

0

0.0

3

1.8

6

3.4

Barnet

77

28.3

77

28.7

64

23.1

Bexley

64

16.0

82

21.0

61

15.4

Brent

80

21.6

70

18.0

62

16.6

Bromley

77

19.7

158

39.6

63

16.2

Croydon

197

39.1

199

39.7

148

28.8

Ealing

96

21.1

74

16.2

94

21.2

Enfield

124

27.1

144

32.7

154

35.6

Haringey

136

40.0

89

28.1

87

30.6

Harrow

71

38.8

44

23.2

74

38.9

Havering

9

3.4

19

9.0

44

20.9

Hillingdon

106

33.1

152

35.4

121

27.4

Hounslow

109

28.8

85

23.2

89

23.7

Kingston upon Thames

48

20.2

70

28.0

67

25.9

Merton

95

39.6

92

38.7

97

39.8

Newham

63

50.8

27

23.7

17

15.0

Redbridge

160

37.0

158

37.9

189

46.6

Richmond upon Thames

26

15.5

20

13.3

25

17.6

Sutton

137

50.9

111

46.1

105

42.0

Waltham Forest

168

28.5

119

20.6

110

19.0

2003 2004

Number absent

As percentage of compulsory school age

Number absent

As percentage of compulsory school age

London, City of

0

n/a

0

n/a

Camden

62

23.8

57

20.3

Greenwich

224

52.0

222

52.9

Hackney

222

62.9

188

53.0

Hammersmith and Fulham

69

26.0

70

26.0

Islington

10

4.6

6

2.7

Kensington and Chelsea

(11)

(11)

(11)

(11)

Lambeth

150

38.6

215

39.7

Lewisham

212

39.0

234

45.6

Southwark

209

47.1

243

55.5

Tower Hamlets

106

31.7

101

32.3

Wandsworth

255

44.9

239

43.7

Westminster, City of

(11)

(11)

0

0.0

Barking and Dagenham

8

4.8

(11)

(11)

Barnet

46

15.6

90

29.6

Bexley

87

22.0

118

28.6

Brent

46

12.5

33

9.4

Bromley

75

18.0

84

19.6

Croydon

216

39.6

138

25.6

Ealing

81

19.2

73

16.7

Enfield

114

25.4

131

29.2

Haringey

81

27.4

93

32.1

Harrow

94

44.5

73

33.8

Havering

46

20.5

55

24.3

Hillingdon

130

29.7

113

25.5

Hounslow

90

24.2

93

25.1

Kingston upon Thames

37

15.0

23

10.3

Merton

92

37.2

71

30.2

Newham

57

42.9

74

55.2

Redbridge

169

41.5

167

42.6

Richmond upon Thames

21

14.8

23

17.2

Sutton

168

59.8

125

46.1

Waltham Forest

112

20.4

71

12.4

n/a=not applicable

(11)not available due to low number

Sixth Forms

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 14 June 2005, Official Report, column 368W, on sixth forms, when the guidance to which she refers will be published. [8482]

We plan to issue the guidance for consultation with stakeholder representative groups later in the summer.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 14 June 2005, Official Report, columns 368W and 220W, who the national and local stakeholders are, in addition to the Learning and Skills Council and local education authorities. [8483]

Officials have spoken about the establishment of school sixth forms to a very wide range of national and local stakeholders in the context of the five-year strategy and informally in the normal course of business. These include school, college and work-based learning providers and a variety of representative bodies.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 14 June 2005, Official Report, column 368W, on sixth forms, if she will make a statement on the outcome of the discussions to which she refers. [8484]

Discussions with stakeholders have informed the development of the guidance on the organisation of 16–19 provision that we plan to issue for consultation with stakeholder representative bodies later in the summer.

State Boarding Schools

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the cost was of building repairs for state boarding schools in the last year for which figures are available. [8488]

The Department does not hold information on the total cost of repairs carried out to school premises.

Revenue funding and the bulk of schools capital funding is allocated by formula to authorities and schools so that they can address their local priorities, including premises maintenance. Prioritisation of need should be through an open, rigorous and consultative asset management planning process, based on assessments of the needs of all schools.

Central Government capital support for investment in schools has increased from under £700 million in 1996–97 to £5.5 billion this year and will rise further to £6.3 billion by 2007–08. Progress is being made year-by-year in improving the quality of the school building stock.

Sure Start

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what estimate she has made of whether local authorities have sufficient capital funding to meet targets for phase two Sure Start children's centres. [6711]

A total of £947 million funding has been made available to local authorities in the second phase of the children's centres programme. This includes £405,523,772 capital funding. We are confident that the individual capital allocations given to local authorities are sufficient for them to achieve the children centres targets we have set for them in the period 2006–08. The funding has been formulated on the premise that children's centres will grow out of a range of existing provision such as Sure Start local programmes, neighbourhood nurseries and primary schools.

Teachers

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many teachers have been the victims of offences of violence in each of the last 10 years. [4946]

I will write to the hon. Member with the information requested and place a copy of my reply in the House of Commons Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many teachers have been assaulted by (a) pupils and (b) parents in (i) each London borough and (ii) London in each of the last five years. [8299]

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many (a) full-time and (b) part-time teachers there were in each of the last five years in each London borough; and if she will make a statement. [8403]

The following tables provide the information requested for January of each year from 1997 to 2004, the latest information available at LEA level.

Number of full-time teachers

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

City of London

10

20

10

20

10

Camden

1,190

1,240

1,400

1,300

1,260

Greenwich

1,810

1,820

1,870

1,900

1,950

Hackney

1,400

1,370

1,350

1,470

1,400

Hammersmith and Fulham

890

910

930

970

1,020

Islington

1,220

1,180

1,310

1,250

1,310

Kensington and Chelsea

580

600

610

640

620

Lambeth

1,400

1,420

1,510

1,470

1,510

Lewisham

1,640

1,730

1,800

1,780

1,740

Southwark

1,710

1,810

1,900

1,940

1,900

Tower Hamlets

1,990

1,980

2,010

2,070

2,060

Wandsworth

1,500

1,530

1,570

1,550

1,570

Westminster

1,090

1,140

1,160

1,160

1,160

Barking and Dagenham

1,400

1,420

1,460

1,510

1,610

Barnet

2,360

2,360

2,480

2,490

2,450

Bexley

1,790

1,870

1,980

1,920

1,940

Brent

1,960

1,940

2,000

2,170

2,190

Bromley

2,150

2,270

2,350

2,290

2,320

Croydon

2,470

2,460

2,530

2,640

2,610

Baling

2,080

2,050

2,130

2,060

2,120

Enfield

2,430

2,480

2,430

2,540

2,590

Haringey

1,720

1,730

1,740

1,750

1,740

Harrow

1,190

1,310

1,310

1,340

1,350

Havering

1,720

1,760

1,840

1,870

1,870

Hillingdon

1,980

2,010

2,060

2,060

2,160

Hounslow

1,780

1,860

1,830

1,840

1,940

Kingston upon Thames

930

950

960

1,050

1,010

Merton

1,030

1,090

1,100

1,120

1,070

Newham

2,270

2,320

2,420

2,460

2,670

Red bridge

2,020

2,170

2,190

2,240

2,280

Richmond upon Thames

860

860

880

940

890

Sutton

1,330

1,380

1,420

1,540

1,500

Waltham Forest

1,910

1,800

1,910

1,760

1,930

London

51,800

52,810

54,440

55,080

55,750

Note:

Figures are rounded to the nearest 10.

Source:

Annual survey of teachers in service and teacher vacancies.

Full-time equivalent number of part-time teachers

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

City of London

(12)

10

(12)

(12)

(12)

Camden

150

200

160

150

160

Greenwich

230

210

210

240

240

Hackney

110

110

120

140

140

Hammersmith and Fulham

110

100

80

90

110

Islington

130

120

150

130

140

Kensington and Chelsea

60

60

60

80

70

Lambeth

220

160

160

160

160

Lewisham

240

250

270

270

270

Southwark

140

160

170

150

130

Tower Hamlets

260

200

210

240

230

Wandsworth

190

200

200

200

200

Westminster

100

120

140

150

130

Barking and Dagenham

70

60

60

70

70

Barnet

350

390

340

360

350

Bexley

130

160

180

160

170

Brent

150

170

160

200

160

Bromley

180

270

290

300

300

Croydon

410

360

330

230

280

Ealing

170

170

190

250

190

Enfield

310

190

230

280

300

Haringey

130

120

150

150

170

Harrow

200

180

190

210

210

Havering

170

190

200

190

220

Hillingdon

150

170

170

170

200

Hounslow

160

160

180

170

170

Kingston upon Thames

120

120

110

120

140

Merton

120

120

120

130

120

Newham

80

100

100

110

120

Red bridge

180

210

190

230

230

Richmond upon Thames

170

180

210

150

160

Button

150

150

160

170

200

Waltham Forest

150

140

110

180

150

London

5,500

5,480

5,610

5,840

5,850

(12)Nil or less than 5.

Note:

Figures are rounded to the nearest 10.

Source:

Annual survey of teachers in service and teacher vacancies.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many (a) full-time teachers and (b) full-time equivalent teachers and (c) full-time equivalent teaching assistants there were in the London borough of Sutton in (i) 1985 and (ii) the last year for which figures are available. [7246]

The following table provides the available information. The numbers of teaching assistants for 1985 are not available—collection of data comparable with those for 2004 did not commence until 1995 and these have been included in the table.

Teacher and teaching assistant numbers, Sutton LEA

1985

1995

2004

Teachers

Full-time(13)

1,140

1,230

1,440

Full-time equivalent(14)

1,210

1,360

1,700

Teaching assistants

Full-time equivalent

n/a

120

370

n/a=not available

(13)Includes full-time regular qualified teachers.

(14)Includes the full-time equivalent of all regular teachers.

Sources:

Annual survey of teachers in service and teacher vacancies (form 618g) for teacher numbers.

Annual School Census for teaching assistants.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if she will make a statement on the Teaching and Learning Responsibility Payments Scheme. [8543]

The new Teaching and Learning Responsibility payments for teachers, which replace current management allowances from 1 January 2006, will make a positive contribution to improving the performance of our schools by focusing payments to teachers for additional responsibilities on matters related to the teaching and learning of pupils, rather than those management functions which do not require a qualified teacher.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills whether the Teaching and Learning Responsibility Scheme increases the pay of teachers with managerial responsibilities. [8544]

It will be for schools to determine the levels of Teaching and Learning Responsibility payments awarded to teachers. Schools will take these decisions in the context of the financial parameters for the award of the two levels of Teaching and Learning Responsibility payments, the criterion and factors for the award of TLRs and the decisions they have made on their school staffing structure.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how her Department ensures that teachers who undertake managerial responsibilities are appropriately remunerated. [8545]

The school teachers' pay and conditions document provides the framework for the payment of teachers in maintained schools. This is reviewed and updated regularly following recommendations from the independent School Teachers' Review Body, which takes evidence from the national representatives of interested parties, including employers and teachers. The Department strives to work in close cooperation with these partners to ensure that schools have an effective and appropriate framework for rewarding teachers.

Temporary Classrooms

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Fareham (Mr. Hoban) of 14 June 2005, Official Report, column 371W, on temporary classrooms, if she will take steps to obtain information on the numbers of temporary classrooms in the local education authorities who have yet to provide accurate data. [6817]

Authorities are encouraged to supply good quality, comprehensive premises data. However, there are no statutory requirements to do so and no plans to take measures, other than encouragement, in relation to authorities with poor quality, or incomplete data. A new data set has been requested from authorities by the end of 2005.

Truancy

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many pupils truanted in each London borough in each of the last five years. [8334]

The information requested is shown in the following tables.

These figures relate to unauthorised absence, this includes all unexplained or unjustified absences, such as lateness, holidays during term time not authorised by the school, absence where reason is not yet established and truancy.

Number of pupils absent for at least one half day due to unauthorised absence, 2000 to 2004: maintained schools in England (excluding special schools and CTCs)

Primary

2000

2001

2002

Local education authority

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

London, City of

75

42.4

60

32.8

24

13.5

Camden

2,633

28.3

3,503

37.5

3,596

38.5

Greenwich

6,141

35.6

6,205

35.5

6,050

34.9

Hackney

5,187

34.7

5,422

36.7

5,121

34.5

Hammersmith and Fulham

2,588

31.0

1,867

24.1

2,057

25.6

Islington

4,206

32.4

4,265

32.2

4,443

33.9

Kensington and Chelsea

1,721

34.9

1,592

27.6

1,663

29.2

Lambeth

5,424

36.6

5,647

35.2

4,489

28.7

Lewisham

7,199

39.7

8,376

42.3

7,440

38.5

Southwark

7,713

42.2

7,912

41.7

8,816

43.9

Tower Hamlets

8,581

49.7

8,779

49.9

8,265

48.0

Wandsworth

3,035

21.1

2,841

19.9

2,680

19.0

Westminster, City of

2,623

35.2

2,481

29.4

2,505

28.7

Barking and Dagenham

5,758

38.2

5,602

36.9

6,124

40.6

Barnet

3,826

17.9

4,070

18.4

4,393

20.0

Bexley

2,286

13.4

1,861

10.2

2,098

11.4

Brent

3,971

21.2

3,198

17.4

3,262

17.4

Bromley

3,090

14.0

2,941

13.1

2,943

13.4

Croydon

4,156

16.2

4,829

18.1

4,704

17.8

Ealing

3,722

17.3

3,142

14.6

2,378

11.1

Enfield

6,444

29.5

6,559

28.8

7,149

30.6

Haringey

6,016

38.7

6,723

39.1

7,210

40.3

Harrow

3,145

17.8

2,782

16.1

2,274

13.5

Havering

1,414

7.9

1,573

8.7

1,727

9.8

Hillingdon

5,292

25.8

5,330

27.8

4,875

24.4

Hounslow

4,213

26.5

4,921

31.9

4,920

31.4

Kingston upon Thames

1,158

12.7

907

9.4

933

9.7

Merton

2,543

20.8

1,875

15.8

1,677

14.1

Newham

12,319

51.0

12,254

48.0

11,584

44.6

Redbridge

4,962

27.4

6,214

31.3

5,402

26.8

Richmond upon Thames

778

7.5

796

7.7

896

8.7

Sutton

1,636

12.7

1,839

14.6

1,794

14.1

Waltham Forest

4,192

23.0

4,286

22.9

3,289

18.1

2003 2004

Number absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

London, City of

0

0.0

25

14.2

Camden

2,874

30.8

2,691

28.6

Greenwich

6,674

38.1

6,254

35.9

Hackney

4,943

33.5

5,023

33.9

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,510

19.7

1,752

22.6

Islington

4,716

36.5

3,864

30.5

Kensington and Chelsea

1,505

26.4

1,108

19.1

Lambeth

5,348

31.7

4,996

29.9

Lewisham

6,753

34.6

7,151

36.6

Southwark

9,472

46.2

8,753

41.5

Tower Hamlets

8,173

46.8

8,364

47.5

Wandsworth

2,831

19.6

2,794

20.1

Westminster, City of

2,346

26.3

1,889

21.4

Barking and Dagenham

6,265

41.2

5,568

36.6

Barnet

4,318

19.4

5,328

24.1

Bexley

1,967

11.0

2,016

11.3

Brent

3,036

16.2

3,246

17.2

Bromley

3,180

14.5

4,405

20.6

Croydon

5,456

21.2

5,727

22.1

Ealing

2,166

10.1

2,490

11.8

Enfield

7,446

32.0

6,514

27.7

Haringey

7,351

40.2

6,455

35.4

Harrow

1,675

9.7

1,514

8.7

Havering

1,745

10.0

1,732

10.0

Hillingdon

4,370

22.1

4,207

21.7

Hounslow

5,539

35.7

5,373

34.9

Kingston upon Thames

834

8.7

950

10.0

Merton

1,640

14.9

1,355

12.1

Newham

9,962

38.3

7,389

28.7

Redbridge

5,377

26.7

5,745

29.1

Richmond upon Thames

1,150

10.9

1,576

14.5

Sutton

1,594

12.7

1,609

13.0

Waltham Forest

3,500

19.6

3,759

21.3

Number of pupils absent for at least one half day due to unauthorised absence, 2000 to 2004: maintained schools in England (excluding special schools and CTCs)

Secondary

2000

2001

2002

Local education authority

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number

absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

London, City of

0

(15)

0

(15)

0

(15)

Camden

1,774

20.5

2,093

24.2

1,985

22.8

Greenwich

2,818

22.3

3,345

26.0

3,715

28.6

Hackney

1,945

28.2

2,595

33.5

2,876

35.0

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,268

24.5

1,302

21.0

1,375

22.1

Islington

2,371

33.5

2,739

36.1

2,360

29.9

Kensington and Chelsea

1,080

34.6

1,077

34.4

925

30.0

Lambeth

1,418

19.9

1,674

23.4

1,746

24.3

Lewisham

4,224

38.8

4,595

40.8

4,474

43.4

Southwark

2,581

25.5

2,566

24.4

3,311

30.8

Tower Hamlets

5,567

42.2

5,592

41.5

5,831

42.9

Wandsworth

1,910

21.3

2,155

24.1

2,218

24.9

Westminster, City of

3,066

43.5

1,799

25.2

2,331

32.6

Barking and Dagenham

2,804

28.7

3,181

31.7

3,614

34.5

Barnet

2,601

15.2

3,148

17.6

3,939

22.1

Bexley

2,546

17.0

3,224

20.6

3,361

21.0

Brent

1,875

15.4

1,930

15.6

1,874

15.0

Bromley

2,030

11.8

3,519

19.9

3,188

17.6

Croydon

2,323

14.7

2,314

13.5

2,688

15.2

Ealing

2,062

15.4

2,804

20.7

2,545

18.5

Enfield

5,509

31.5

6,238

35.2

5,864

32.9

Haringey

2,697

26.3

2,786

30.0

4,150

37.5

Harrow

862

9.7

1,111

12.2

1,097

11.9

Havering

1,753

11.9

2,112

14.0

2,101

13.7

Hillingdon

3,434

24.8

3,125

22.1

3,541

23.8

Hounslow

1,866

13.6

1,681

12.1

2,494

18.2

Kingston upon Thames

1,280

17.9

997

13.6

1,143

15.3

Merton

2,168

28.5

2,156

28.9

2,106

29.2

Newham

7,622

43.7

7,831

44.5

7,363

41.5

Redbridge

1,654

10.8

2,072

13.7

2,800

18.2

Richmond upon Thames

1,478

19.2

2,332

30.1

2,700

35.7

Sutton

1,026

8.8

1,512

12.4

2,106

17.0

Waltham Forest

3,476

27.5

3,715

28.9

3,749

28.5

2003 2004

Local education authority

Number absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

Number absent

As percentage of pupils of compulsory school age

London, City of

0

(15)

0

(15)

Camden

1,755

23.2

1,628

21.6

Greenwich

4,426

33.5

4,913

36.9

Hackney

2,112

26.2

2,727

37.6

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,492

23.7

1,580

25.6

Islington

2,811

35.2

2,876

36.1

Kensington and Chelsea

890

28.8

568

18.3

Lambeth

1,685

23.2

870

11.5

Lewisham

4,137

36.6

5,340

47.2

Southwark

3,897

35.6

2,831

25.2

Tower Hamlets

6,501

48.2

6,186

45.6

Wandsworth

2,322

25.7

1,705

21.6

Westminster, City of

2,992

41.4

3,302

44.7

Barking and Dagenham

3,851

35.4

4,019

35.5

Barnet

3,324

18.5

4,090

23.4

Bexley

2,944

18.8

3,556

21.1

Brent

2,705

19.8

2,240

16.1

Bromley

4,302

23.8

3,428

18.7

Croydon

4,733

26.2

3,931

21.9

Ealing

2,279

16.3

2,990

21.3

Enfield

6,443

35.2

8,062

42.7

Haringey

4,666

41.7

4,325

38.2

Harrow

1,125

12.1

1,100

11.8

Havering

1,993

12.8

2,237

14.2

Hillingdon

4,729

31.4

4,992

31.9

Hounslow

2,317

16.5

3,074

22.0

Kingston upon Thames

845

11.1

724

10.8

Merton

2,295

27.8

2,073

25.2

Newham

6,969

38.3

6,367

35.0

Redbridge

2,630

16.6

4,203

26.3

Richmond upon Thames

2,419

31.8

2,737

35.9

Sutton

1,938

15.1

2,518

19.2

Waltham Forest

3,316

24.9

5,012

36.6

(15)Not applicable

University Admissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what steps her Department has taken regarding post-qualification application to university for undergraduate courses. [8471]

In September 2004, the Secretary of State announced that work would begin to look at the options for implementing a system of post-qualification application to higher education. Officials have been taking this work forward, consulting widely with interested parties and engaging with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Government, of course, respect the autonomy of the HE sector and is absolutely clear that admissions policies are entirely the responsibility of HE institutions. Later this year, we plan to conduct a formal public consultation exercise to seek views on possible reforms to applications procedures.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if she will make a statement on the use of aptitude tests for university admissions. [8473]

The independent review of admissions to higher education which was led by Professor Steven Schwartz acknowledged that assessing an applicant's potential for higher education (HE) study, or recognising ability which may not be reflected fully in Level 3 examination results, is a key issue for fair admissions. The steering group's report in September 2004 suggested that a test that is able to predict performance in HE may help to uncover hidden talent. It also acknowledged the potential burden for applicants of up to six sets of admissions requirements and means of assessment. The report therefore recommended a national research study to assess the idea of a national test of potential. We support this as an early task for a new centre of expertise on admissions which the steering group also recommended. The HE sector is discussing the formation of that centre. Whilst we do not believe in tests for tests sake, if there is a genuine need for a national test it would be right to explore the opportunity.

Vocational Learning

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 14 June 2005, Official Report, column 362W, on post-16 education, what action her Department will take to encourage private sector providers of vocational learning to come forward through competitions. [8481]

The LSC already contracts with private sector providers for post-16 learning provision, some selected on the basis of competitive tendering arrangements. We expect the LSC to build on their experience in encouraging high quality private sector providers to enter the new 16–19 competitions where the output specifications are for vocational provision. In addition, the 14–19 White Paper heralded our intention to develop a comprehensive vocational network, including public and private sector providers, that will contribute to delivery of the 14–19 entitlement for all learners by 2015.

Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

Iran

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on reports of the destruction of the Baha"'-" cemetery in Yazd in February and the desecration of a Baha"'-" corpse; and what assessment his Department has made of the official investigations into these crimes. [7943]

We have received reports that a Baha"'-" cemetery in Yazd was destroyed. Cars were said to have been driven over graves, leaving human remains exposed. We condemn any such action unreservedly. We are not aware of an official investigation.

We have made clear to the Iranian authorities our serious concern about the situation of the Baha"'-" community in Iran. We have also encouraged the EU to take action, doing so most recently on 21 June. We will make support for human rights a priority in the EU's relations with Iran during the UK's presidency of the EU.

Bangladesh

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of human rights in Bangladesh; what recent research he has evaluated on the situation; and what representations he has made to the Bangladeshi authorities on action to prevent human rights abuses. [7892]

I refer the hon. Member to the statement made in another place by my noble Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Lord Triesman of Tottenham) on Bangladesh on 23 June 2005, Official Report, columns 1780–86. We will continue to raise our concerns with the Government of Bangladesh about the human rights situation and the need to strengthen the rule of law both bilaterally and with our EU partners. We look to the Government of Bangladesh to uphold its international human rights obligations, such as those contained in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, of which Bangladesh is a signatory.

British Embassies

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many new British embassies have been opened since 1997. [7009]

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has opened 10 Embassies and High Commissions since 1997. The following table provides further details. In some cases the mission has been opened previously, but not formally as an Embassy or High Commission. The previous status of such missions is shown in the table.

Embassies and high commissions opened since 1997

Mission

Previous status

2000–01

Tripoli

Mission originally represented by British Interests Section of the Italian Embassy.

2001–02

Pyongyang

Asmara

Previously opened with local staff only.

Bamako

Previously opened with local staff only.

Dushanbe

Kabul

2002–03

Conakry

Previously opened with local staff only.

Dili

Mission originally opened as mission to

Chisinau

the UN in Jakarta

2004–05

Baghdad

In reply to the right hon. Member for Devizes (Mr. Ancram) in answer to a similar written parliamentary question on 11 February 2003, Official Report, column 722W, I stated incorrectly that our Embassy in Asmara opened in financial year 2000–01. This should have read 2001–02, as shown in the table. I would like to apologise for the error.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many British embassies have been closed since 1997. [7010]

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has closed five embassies and high commissions since 1997. These were in Bamako, Managua, San Salvador, Tegucigalpa and Asuncion. A further post, Nassau, is scheduled to close on 30 June 2005.

Charlotte Wilson

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of whether the killing in Burundi in December 2000 during which Charlotte Wilson, a British national, was killed, constitutes a war crime prosecutable via the International Criminal Court; and if he will make a statement. [7754]

It is possible that the attack in which Charlotte Wilson and many others were murdered could constitute a war crime" as defined under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). However, the ICC could not have jurisdiction in this case as the crime pre-dates the coming into force of the Rome Statute on 1 July 2002. It is impossible to refer crimes which took place before this date to the ICC.

Whether to define this attack as a war crime" can only be decided upon by a competent court. The UK Government will continue to press the Burundian authorities to investigate this crime fully and bring Charlotte Wilson's killers to justice.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will take steps through (a) the UN, (b) the EU and (c) diplomatic channels to ensure the December 2000 killings in which British national Charlotte Wilson was killed is fully pursued and its perpetrators are brought to justice and are not given any amnesty; and if he will make a statement. [7755]

We will continue to press the Burundian authorities for progress in bringing Charlotte Wilson's killers to justice. Our ambassador to Burundi raised this most recently with the Burundian Interior Minister on 17 June.

We have made clear in recent UN Security Council and European Union statements that the climate of impunity in the Great Lakes region must end. We will continue to push for those that have committed serious human rights abuses to be brought to trial.

We have expressed support for the UN Secretary-General's proposal for a mixed UN and Burundian special chamber to investigate and prosecute those most responsible for such crimes.

Computer Crime

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many cases of computer (a) hacking, (b) fraud and (c) theft his Department recorded in each year since 2001–02; and for each year on how many occasions computer systems have been illegally accessed by computer hackers (i)within and (ii) outside his Department. [6948]

There is no evidence of any successful hacking attacks being mounted against the Foreign and Commonwealth Office since 2002 nor is there any evidence of computer based fraud.

Details of recorded thefts of computers are as follows:

Laptops

Personal computers

2001–02(16)

2002–03

4

0

2003–04

2

0

2004–05

3

2

(16)No records exist for this period

Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he will answer the letter dated 29 April from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mr Y Abbas. [7886]

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he will reply to the letter from the hon. Member for Birmingham, Ladywood on visas dated 21 February 2005 regarding a family reunion for Mr. B. Sargainell. [7970]

UKvisas have contacted my right hon. Friend with regard to this case, which is a matter for the Home Office.

European Convention on Human Rights

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of the implications of the European Convention on Human Rights for the Government's policy on the provision of information to overseas prosecuting authorities in cases which would lead to the imposition of the death penalty. [7843]

holding answer 28 June 2005

The opposition of the Government to the death penalty is well known. When deciding whether to provide information to prosecuting authorities abroad the Government takes all relevant factors into account, including the possibility of the death penalty being imposed and our international obligations. Our view is that this policy is in line with the obligations of the UK under the European Convention on Human Rights.

Middle East

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions he has had with other members of the Quartet about monitoring Israeli withdrawal from the specified settlements in the northern West Bank; which areas are included in this withdrawal; what the timescale is; how the land evacuated will be returned to Palestinian control; and what compensation has been agreed for the former Palestinian landowners for damage incurred. [8052]

Quartet (UN, US, EU and Russia) discussions on Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and part of the West Bank are ongoing. Most recently, Quartet Principals, along with Quartet Special Envoy for Disengagement James Wolfensohn and US Security Co-ordinator General Ward, met in London on 23 June to discuss these issues, prior to further discussion at the G8 Foreign Ministers Meeting.

The Quartet discussions continue to focus on the geographical areas to be included in the withdrawal, the timescale for withdrawal and how the areas will be returned to Palestinian control. These are also subject to close discussion with and between the parties, assisted by Mr. Wolfensohn. Compensation for former Palestinian landowners has not been agreed at this stage.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions his Department has had with other G8 Foreign Ministers about independent monitoring of Israeli and Palestinian authorities' compliance with commitments during the Gaza withdrawal; and what mechanisms have been put in place. [8053]

My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary hosted a meeting of G8 Foreign Ministers in London on 23 June. Quartet Special Envoy for Disengagement, James Wolfensohn, and US Security Co-ordinator, General William Ward, also attended to discuss the Middle East peace process and Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip and parts of the West Bank. James Wolfensohn set out his plans for assisting disengagement, including to help both parties implement the actions required of them, to encourage them to co-ordinate fully with each other and for the international community to support Palestinian economic and institutional development. G8 Foreign Ministers offered support and appreciation for his work.

Radiological Weapons (Public Education)

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps he has taken in response to the recommendation of the Report of the UN Secretary General's High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, A more secure world: Our shared responsibility, that the public should be educated on the consequences of radiological weapons. [7371]

The Government take seriously their responsibility to prepare the public for emergencies, but is careful not to raise the profile of any specific risk disproportionately. General guidance on the steps the public can take to prepare for, and respond to, any major emergency is available on the preparing for emergencies website: (wwvv.preparingforemergencies.gov.uk). More detailed information is also available on the effects of radiological material at: (www.mi5.gov.uk. and wmv.hpa.org.uk).

The emergency services will always issue specific advice at the time of an incident, including any incident involving release of a radiological material.

Russia

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether (a) he and (b) his Department has made representations to the Russian Foreign Minister on issues relating to the ratification of Protocol 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [7709]

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office is actively engaged in a bilateral human rights dialogue with the Russian Government. We have raised Protocol 6 as part of this dialogue. The last round of the dialogue was held in Moscow on 23 May 2005.

We are also engaged, with our European partners, in bi-annual EU-Russia human rights consultations. The first session of consultations took place in Luxembourg on 1 March 2005. Again we raised the implementation in Russia of Protocol 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The next round of consultations is scheduled to take place under the UK presidency of the EU on 8 September 2005. We fully expect discussion of Protocol 6 to feature during these consultations.

In addition to this, staff at our embassy in Moscow continue to raise our concerns with their interlocutors in the Russian Government, including with official institutions in Russia that exist to protect and promote human rights.

Weapons in Space

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the UK Government policy on the US Administration's intention to base weapons in space. [7816]

Work-related Stress

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many cases of work-related stress have been reported in his Department in each of the last three years; how much compensation was paid to employees in each year; how many work days were lost due to work-related stress in each year; at what cost; what procedures have been put in place to reduce work-related stress; at what cost; and if he will make a statement. [7863]

My Department does not currently keep statistics on reported cases of work-related stress or on work-related stress as a sickness absence type. No compensation has been paid to employees because of work-related stress in the past three years. All Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) staff, and dependants overseas, can discuss work-related and personal concerns in confidence with a trained welfare officer. Since March 2002, the FCO has also provided a confidential counselling and advice service to staff both in the UK and overseas, and to dependants overseas, through an Employee Assistance Programme (EAP). Work-related stress is one of the issues for which the EAP can provide counselling and support. The cost is approximately £58,000 per annum.

Northern Ireland

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what measures are in place to assist pupils suffering from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in (a) schools and (b) colleges in Northern Ireland. [7836]

Education and Library Boards' psychology services and behaviour support services offer advice to schools in relation to the management of pupils with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The type of support offered is dependent on the needs of the school or child but can range from advice on writing an individual behaviour plan to placement in a primary or post-primary guidance centre. Most pupils with ADHD have such extremely challenging behaviour that boards maintain statements of special educational need for them and provide funding for additional support to assist the school to meet the pupil's needs.

School staff can also receive advice and training in behaviour management strategies and through specific targeted interventions in the management of pupils with ADHD. These in-service courses are available in some board areas on a whole-school basis on request and through teacher or classroom assistant attendance at courses in teachers' centres.

In 2004, a working group of educational psychologists from across the five Education and Library Boards prepared two information booklets on ADHD which were published by DE—one a practical guide for parents and carers and the other a practical guide for schools.

The Department for Employment and Learning has put in place a range of initiatives and funding streams designed to assist FE college students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities including those suffering from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. These include the publication of a good practice guide; support for staff development activities for senior management, and financial assistance towards the costs of technical or carer support for learners.

Bus Shelters

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how much has been spent on the erection of bus shelters in Northern Ireland in each year since 1997; and how much has been spent on (a) repairing and (b) replacing such shelters in each year since 2000. [7628]

The Chief Executive of Roads Service (Dr. Malcom McKibbin) has been asked to write to the hon. Gentleman.

Letter from Dr. McKibbin to Mr. Nigel Dodds, dated June 2005

You recently asked the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland a Parliamentary Question: how much has been spent on the erection of bus shelters in Northern Ireland in each year since 1997; and how much has been spent on(a) repairing and (b)replacing such shelters in each year since 2000."

I have been asked to reply as this issue falls within my responsibility as Chief Executive of Roads Service.

You may be aware that, in January 2001, roads service and most district councils entered into a 15-year contract with bus shelter provider Adshel, for the provision of approximately 1500 bus shelters throughout the council areas. The provision and maintenance of these shelters are funded by Adshel through advertising revenue, and are therefore provided at no cost to the Department. The Department has no knowledge of the costs incurred by Adshel in carrying out their contractual commitments.

District councils are still permitted to provide additional bus shelters at their own expense, however, Adshel have the sole advertising rights, and Translink is also permitted to erect bus shelters at their own expense under Permitted Development Rights.

In addition, roads service has a small budget of approximately £1000 per year to maintain the limited number of bus shelters provided by the Department prior to the commencement of the Adshel contract. However, we have not carried out any shelter replacements since 2000.

I hope this information is helpful.

Early Release (Recidivism)

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many prisoners given early release under the terms of the Belfast Agreement have been returned to prison; and for what reasons. [7093]

Of the 447 persons released under the Northern Ireland (Sentences) Act 1988 13 have been returned to prison in accordance with the provisions of section 9 of that Act because the Secretary of State believed they had broken, or were likely to break, their licence conditions.

Equality (Stranmillis University College)

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what the total number of respondents was to the recent equality impact assessment of the governance arrangements at Stranmillis university college; and how many of these (a) supported and (b) opposed removing the transferor's representatives from the governing body. [7051]

Ten responses to the recent equality assessment on the governance arrangements that will follow the incorporation of Stranmillis university college were received. Four respondents supported and four opposed removing the transferors' representatives from the governing body. Two made no comment on this issue.

Firearm Certificates

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what the average time taken for firearm certificate applications to be processed was in each of the last 12 months for which figures are available. [7170]

The Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland has released the following information.

Average length of time taken to process an application for a firearm certificate

Weeks

2004

July

4(17)

August

4(17)

September

4(17)

October

4(17)

November

4(17)

December

8(17)(18)

2005

January

8(17)(18)

February

14

March

14

April

14

May

14

June

14

(17)Does not reflect processing time by local police.

(18)Reflects additional time needed for staff training and other preparatory work to facilitate introduction of new computerised licensing system.

Invest Northern Ireland

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what insurance arrangements for third parties are in place in respect of premises and properties in the possession of Invest Northern Ireland. [7851]

Pension Credit

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many people in Northern Ireland are in receipt of pension credit; and what the average amount of pension credit is. [7833]

The following table shows the number of people in Northern Ireland in receipt of pension credit and their corresponding average amounts of pension credit, broken down by claimants and partners. The data are taken at May 2005.

Numbers

Average amount (£)

Claimants

90,929

57.64

Partners

19,952

71.29

Safety Cameras

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many speed cameras have been in place in Northern Ireland in each year since 2001. [7830]

During 2001, 2002 and up to June 2003, there were five mobile safety camera vehicles in operation across Northern Ireland.

The launch of the Northern Ireland Safety Camera Scheme on 1 July 2003 saw these resources boosted by the installation of three fixed site safety cameras at locations on the Antrim Road, Saintfield Road and the Upper Newtownards Road and the deployment of an additional three mobile safety camera vehicles.

The installation of a further fixed site safety camera on the Springfield Road in November 2003 means that there are now four fixed site safety cameras and eight mobile safety camera vehicles in operation within Northern Ireland. All are at locations with a history of speeding and collision.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how much has been raised through fines imposed as a result of speeding detected by speed cameras in Northern Ireland in each year since 2001. [7831]

The number of fixed penalty notices (FPNs) issued for excess speed since 2001 that have been paid are:

FPNs issued

Fine levied per FPN (£)

Revenue generated (£)

2001

10,750

60

645,000

2002

16,170

60

970,200

2003

12,913

60

774,780

2004

12,010

60

720,600

The fine revenue generated by safety cameras operated in Northern Ireland is paid into the UK Consolidated Fund and at the moment, none of that revenue is returned to the PSNI because of the unique manner in which the PSNI is funded by Treasury.

However, legislation is currently being prepared that will allow the PSNI to recover costs associated with the operation and maintenance of the Northern Ireland Safety Camera Scheme in future and this money will be used to develop the scheme through the identification of further routes and locations where the deployment of additional cameras can be used to maximize the reduction of serious casualties in future.

State Pension

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what percentage of women in Northern Ireland are entitled in their own right to a full basic state pension; what measures are being taken to increase this percentage; and if he will make a statement. [7390]

As of September 2004, 15.6 per cent. of women of pensionable age were in receipt of a full basic state pension in their own right. The position of female pensioners today is largely a legacy of the past. When looking at the position across the UK of people of working age now there is very little difference between the proportions of men and women accruing state pension rights.

Many of the Government's labour market policies such as the national minimum wage, tax credits and new deals have been particularly helpful in supporting women remaining in, or returning to, employment and enabling them to build up pension entitlement.

The Pensions Commission has been looking at specific issues regarding women, and the Government have also commissioned their own report on women and pensions to be published by the end of this year.

In addition to this the Social Security Agency has an active programme, which includes the provision of forecasts and retirement planners to ensure that future pensioners are better informed and educated about their entitlements to state pension. A further process is also in place to ensure that all pensioners with any entitlement to state pension are identified, encouraged and facilitated to take up that entitlement.

Temporary Classrooms

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many schools in the Belfast Education and Library Board area have had more than five temporary classrooms in each year since 2001. [7829]

The Department does not have the information requested prior to 2004. A survey was carried out in 2004 to ascertain the number of temporary classrooms in the schools' estate. The result of the survey showed that at 31 March 2004, 18 schools in the Belfast Education and Library Board had more than five temporary classrooms. By 31 March 2005 the number stood at 17.

Constitutional Affairs

Computer-related Offences

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs how many cases of computer (a) hacking, (b) fraud and (c) theft her Department recorded in each year since 2001–02; and for each year, on how many occasions computer systems have been illegally accessed by computer hackers (i)within and (ii) outside her Department. [7183]

The number of cases of computer hacking, fraud and theft recorded by the Lord Chancellor's Department and Department for Constitutional Affairs in each year since 2001–02 is as follows:

2001–02

Number

(a) Hacking

2

(b) Fraud

0

(c) Theft

25

Illegal access by computer hackers in 2001–02 was (i) within the Department 1; (ii) outside the Department 1. Neither of the hacking incidents caused damage to the Departmental computer systems.

2002–03

Number

(a) Hacking

0

(b) Fraud

0

(c) Theft

25

There was no reported illegal access by internal or external computer hackers in 2002–03.

2003–04

Number

(a) Hacking

0

(b) Fraud

0

(c) Theft

33

There was no reported illegal access by internal or external computer hackers in 2003–04.

2004–05

Number

(a) Hacking

0

(b) Fraud

0

(c) Theft

35

There was no reported illegal access by internal or external computer hackers in 2004–05.

Data Protection Act

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will introduce legislation to modify section 7(9) of the Data Protection Act 1998 to provide for a guarantee of the right of access to personal data as required by Article 12 of Directive 95/46/EC; and if she will make a statement. [8056]

The Government currently have no plans to introduce legislation to modify the Data Protection Act 1998.

Electoral Registration

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs which relevant software suppliers have confirmed that their products will be able to produce EML compliant electoral register data for 1 December 2005 electoral registers; which have said their products will not be able to do so; which have not yet expressed a view; and if she will make a statement. [7700]

Of the six software companies that supply more than one electoral registration officer with their software, all have indicated that their product will be able to produce EML compliant electoral register data for 1 December 2005 electoral registers. This is on the understanding that the appropriate new version of the EML standard is agreed and published by the end of July 2005. We are currently approaching the small number of electoral registration officers who operate individual 'bespoke' software for their view on the viability of the target date.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs on what dates marked registers from the 2005 general election were received; what assessment her Department has made of the arrangements for storing the registers securely before being despatched to the Department; and if she will make a statement. [7701]

Delivery of the marked electoral registers to the Clerk of the Crown in Chancery usually occurs within a three week period after a general election. It is the duty of individual returning officers to arrange the delivery of all general election documentation to the Clerk of the Crown, either personally or through the Royal Mail as the universal service provider. Clear guidance is provided to returning officers covering the way in which documentation is to be packaged to enable secure and safe delivery.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will list the constituencies which have (a) all and (b) part of their marked registers from the 2005 general election missing; and if she will make a statement. [7702]

I refer the hon. Member to the written answer I gave to the hon. Member for Birmingham, Yardley (John Hemming) on 20 June 2005, Official Report, column 810W which concerned the marked electoral register for the Woking constituency. Investigations are still continuing.

There have been no other reports of constituencies' marked electoral registers either being mislaid, or missing sections.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs whether the EML standard for electoral register data will be in place for the 1 December 2005 electoral registers; and if she will make a statement. [7712]

1 December 2005 is the latest date we have specified that electoral registration officers should be able to provide electronic copies of their register in compliance with a common EML standard. Suppliers of the relevant software have indicated that that date will be met if an appropriate update to the EML standard can be agreed and published by the end of July 2005. We are currently meeting that target date for a new version of EML.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs how much was spent per elector on voter registration for each local authority area in the UK in descending order for the last year in which figures are available. [8556]

General Election (Monitors)

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs how many international election monitors were present (a) in polling stations and (b) at counts during the 2005 General Election. [7902]

We are aware that a number of international observers, including a delegation from the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe, were present during the 2005 General Election campaign. Observers' access to the electoral process is at the discretion of individual returning officers, and information about the numbers of observers attending polling stations and counts is not held centrally.

Judges (Sexual Offences Training)

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs

(1) if she will list the Court of Appeal judges who have been on a serious sexual offence course; [7687]

(2) what training in serious sexual offences is given to Court of Appeal judges who were promoted from the High Court prior to the introduction of the serious sexual offences course for High Court judges. [7690]

This question relates to a matter that is the responsibility of the judiciary. The Lord Chief Justice informs me that; seven Court of Appeal judges have attended the serious sexual offences course.

The serious sexual offences seminar is, however, specifically designed for judges who hear rape trials. It is currently a residential two-day (over three days) event and past programmes have included talks on the following:

(1) Research into public attitudes to sexual offending and the views of complainants and victims on the way in which sexual offences proceedings are handled.

(2) The policies and practices of the police and Crown Prosecution Service in handling serious sexual offences.

(3) Issues of evidential and procedural law and practice which bear on the conduct of trials in such cases.

(4) Sentencing issues and the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders in the community and in prison. Also included in the programme is a series of discussions, in small groups, of trial and sentencing issues.

I would remind the hon. Member for Redcar that the Court of Appeal only considers matters of law in relation to sexual offences. It does not hear trials in relation to sexual offences. Therefore, although some Court of Appeal judges have attended the serious sexual offences seminar the Lord Chief Justice in conjunction with the Judicial Studies Board has decided that it is not a compulsory element of their training.

Judges of every rank who sit in crime, including the Court of Appeal, have received training on the provisions of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 as part of a programme of training on the Criminal Justice Reforms that ran between January and March 2005. This was supplemented with written material provided at the time the Act came into force.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs on how many rape appeals in2004 there was a tribunal which did not contain a judge who had been on the serious sexual offences seminar. [7688]

This question relates to a matter that is the responsibility of the judiciary. The Lord Chief Justice informs me that the information cannot be provided without incurring disproportionate cost.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs which circuit judges who sit in the Court of Appeal Criminal Division have not been on a serious sexual offences training course. [7691]

This question relates to a matter that is the responsibility of the judiciary. The Lord Chief Justice informs me that all circuit judges who sit in the Court of Appeal Criminal Division have attended the serious sexual offences training course.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs how long ago each judge of the Court of Appeal attended a serious sexual offences seminar. [7689]

This question relates to a matter that is the responsibility of the judiciary. The Lord Chief Justice informs me that the seven Court of Appeal judges who have attended the serious sexual offences seminar have done so in the last six years.

Jury Service

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will commission research to assess the ability of juries to understand complex trials. [8519]

My Department has no plans at the moment to conduct research into the deliberations and requirements of juries. In January 2005 my Department published a Consultation Paper—Jury Research and Impropriety"—and the relevant consultation period finished on 15 April. The responses are currently being analysed and an announcement of the Government's intentions will be made in due course.

Legal Aid

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will increase remuneration for civil legal aid lawyers. [8350]

There are no immediate plans to increase remuneration for civil legal aid lawyers. Civil legal aid lawyers are paid under a variety of remuneration regimes. In most non-family cases, civil legal aid litigation work would normally be paid at private client rates on the successful conclusion of a case against a privately paying opponent.

The LSC provides additional remuneration for specific priority areas of legal aid work. For example, members of specialist panels in family work, and those undertaking priority housing work are paid guaranteed higher rates. Most Legal Help work has received a 2.5 per cent. increase from April 2005 as part of the Tailored Fixed Fee scheme.

Legal Training

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what assessment she has made of the adequacy of solicitors' training arrangements. [8329]

I welcome the Law Society's review of solicitors' training. Regular reviews are necessary to ensure training remains up-to-date, fit for purpose and consistent with the wider needs of society.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what representations she has received on the Law Society's Training Framework Review. [8335]

It is for the Law Society to consider responses to its review on its Training Framework. Any recommendations the Law Society makes as a result of that consultation will then be considered by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs, whose approval would be needed, in accordance with schedule 4 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what assessment she has made of the implications for legal services of trainee solicitors being (a) graduates, (b) law graduates and (c) beneficiaries of regulated vocational training. [8357]

Any recommendations the Law Society makes as a result of its consultation on its training framework will be considered by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs, whose approval would be needed, in accordance with Schedule 4 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990. It would be premature to make such an assessment before any recommendations have been received.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will make representations to the Law Society to increase the openness of training arrangements for solicitors to all parts of society. [8358]

The Law Society is fully committed to ensuring training arrangements are flexible and inclusive, while maintaining rigorous standards. The issue of diversity in the profession is of great importance to me and to the Law Society.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what assessment she has made of the financial implications of the Law Society's proposals for solicitors' training for (a) legal aid, (b) legal services and (c) the legal profession. [8369]

The implications, including financial implications, of any recommendations the Law Society makes following its consultation on its training framework will be considered, in accordance with the provisions of schedule 4 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990. It would be premature to make such an assessment before any recommendations have been received.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will make representations to the Law Society on the implications for legal services of its Training Framework Review. [8370]

I have no plans to comment on the Law Society's proposals while they are the subject of a public consultation. Any recommendations the Law Society makes as a result of that consultation will be considered by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs, whose approval would be needed, in accordance with schedule 4 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what reforms her Department proposes to introduce in relation to solicitors' training. [8373]

It is the responsibility of the Law Society to set standards of entry to the solicitors' profession. However, the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State must approve any proposals for change put forward by the Law Society, in accordance with the provisions of Schedule 4 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990.

Health

Alliance Medical

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many scans Alliance Medical must conduct over the course of its five year contract to provide scanning services in the NHS. [7555]

Alzheimer's Disease

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 6 June 2005, Official Report, column 414W, on Alzheimer's, if she will place in the Library copies of the background papers concerning the reviews to which she refers. [5627]

Only limited papers are readily available about past reviews that looked at the list of medical conditions that give exemption from prescription charges. The cost of searching for all available papers would be disproportionately expensive. The readily available information will be placed in the Library.

An internal review of prescription charges was undertaken by Departmental officials in conjunction with Her Majesty's Treasury as part of the formulation of Government policy for the 1998 comprehensive spending review. This work fed into the outcome of the comprehensive spending review, which was published by Her Majesty's Treasury, pursuant to the answer of 2 February 2005, Official Report, column 908W.

Ambulance Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) how many ambulances were available in the NHS in London in each year since 1997; [7470]

(2) how many NHS ambulances there were in London in each of the last five years. [8307]

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average response time was to an emergency call to the ambulance service in each London borough in each year since 1997. [7471]

This information is not collected centrally in the format requested. Data on response times for London Ambulance Service National Health Service Trust is shown in the tables.

Data is available only from 2000–01 which is the year London Ambulance Service NHS Trust introduced prioritisation.

Further information can be found in the statistical bulletin, Ambulance services, England: 2004–05". Copies are available in the Library and on the Department's website at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/ll/36/79/04113679.pdf

Percentage of category A calls responded within eight minutes

London

1997–98

n/a

1998–99

n/a

1999–2000

n/a

2000–01

41.8

2001–02

57.2

2002–03

69.1

2003–04

76.0

2004–05

76.6

n/a=not available.

Percentage of category A calls responded within 14 to 19 minutes

London

1997–98

n/a

1998–99

n/a

1999–2000

n/a

2000–01

83.3

2001–02

85.7

2002–03

88.6

2003–04

89.6

2004–05

95.9

n/a=not available.

Percentage of category B/C calls responded within 14 to 19minutes

London

1997–98

n/a

1998–99

n/a

1999–2000

n/a

2000–01

79.7

2001–02

78.5

2002–03

79.2

2003–04

77.9

2004–05

81.2

n/a=not available.

Percentage of urgent journeys with arrival time not more than 15minutes late

London

1997–98

79.3

1998–99

69.4

1999–2000

61.0

2000–01

50.1

2001–02

48.4

2002–03

46.7

2003–04

50.0

2004–05

58.0

Appraisals (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) medical devices and (b) pharmaceutical products were submitted for appraisal to the (i)National Institute for Clinical Excellence in (A) 2003 and (B) 2004 and (ii) National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in 2005. [8512]

Details of the appraisal topics referred to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in 2003 and 2004 and to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in 2005 are as follows.

In 2003, two work programmes were referred:

Wave 8—April 2003

Pharmaceuticals

Hormonal treatments for early breast cancer

Imatinib (Glivec) for gastro-intenstinal stromal tumours

Gefitinib (Iressa) for non-small cell lung cancer

Statins for prevention of coronary events

Memantine (Ebixa) for moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease

New pharmaceutical treatments for non-Alzheimer dementias

New treatments for venous leg ulcers

New treatments for diabetic foot ulcers

Omalizumab (Xolair) for uncontrolled asthma

Drotecogin (Xigris) and afelimomab (Segard) for severe sepsis

New treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis

Pimecrolimus (Elidel) and tacrolimus (Protopic) for atopic dermatitis (eczema)

Topical steroids in atopic dermatitis (eczema)

Devices

Dual chamber pacing

Other

Parent training programmes, for treatment and prevention of conduct disorder

Wave 9—October 2003

Pharmaceuticals

Adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B

Erythropoetin ion chemotherapy-induced anaemia

Etanercept and infliximab for ankylosing spondylitis

Ximelagatran for the treatment of venous thromboembolism

Ximelagatran for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation

Nesiritide for acute decompensated heart failure

Prasterone for systemic lupus erythematosus

Other

Fallers clinics

HealOzone for tooth decay

Thrombophilia screening

2004

Wave 10—June 2004

Pharmaceuticals

Atrasentan for hormone refractory prostate cancer

Cetuximab for head and neck cancer

Pemetrexed disodium in the treatment of mesothelioma

Oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine as adjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer

Docetaxel for hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Carmustine implants (Gliadel Wafers) for newly diagnosed high grade glioma

Methadone and Bupenorphine as opiate substitutes

Naltrexone as a treatment for relapse prevention

Pegaptanib for age-related macular degeneration

Natalizumab for multiple sclerosis

Adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis

Lerdelimumab (CAT-152) for prevention of scarring after glaucoma filtration surgery

Strontum ranelate for osteoporosis

Inhaled insulin

Corticosteroids for asthma

Devices

Biventricular pacing (cardiac resynchronisation) for heart failure

Wave 11—April 2005

Pharmaceuticals

Gemcitabine for breast cancer

Docetaxal and paclitaxel for the treatment of early breast cancer

Rituximab for the treatment of low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Erlotinib and permetrexed for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Cinacalcet HCI for hyperparathyroidism

Ezetimibe for hypercholesteremia

Drugs for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Other

Stapled haemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of haemorrhoids

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) if she will ask the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence to look at ways to speed up its appraisal process; and if she will make a statement; [8513]

(2) if she will ask the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence to review its criteria for appraising medical devices. [8514]

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is an independent organisation, which develops its guidance after careful consideration of the available evidence and in consultation with stakeholders. The process by which it develops its guidance is a matter for NICE. Its processes have been developed through wide consultation, are transparent and have been endorsed by the World Health Organisation. NICE reviews its processes regularly in order to identify opportunities for efficiencies in the way they are applied.

Bacteriophages

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what funding has been provided in the last five years by her Department's Research and Development Directorate for research into the effectiveness of bacteriophages in controlling health care associated infection. [3348]

Cancer Treatment

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of alternatives to traditional chemotherapy treatment; whether such treatments are available on the NHS; and what estimate has been made of the number of people for whom such treatment would be appropriate. [7715]

holding answer 28 June 2005

A national chemotherapy advisory group has been set up to consider all aspects of planning and delivery of chemotherapy services and to advise the national cancer director and the Department on the development and delivery of high quality chemotherapy services. This group will consider developments in the field of chemotherapy and their implications for chemotherapy services in the national health service.

A cancer drugs forward planning group has also been set up to identify and consider new cancer drugs and, using a set of agreed criteria, to prioritise them for consideration by the advisory committee for topic selection for potential referral to National Institute for Healthcare and Clinical Excellence.

Clinical Trials

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will make a statement on the use of public private partnership initiatives to develop clinical drug trials. [6955]

The Government aims to work in partnership with the public and private sectors to sustain clinical research for the benefit of patients and the public. In 2002, the pharmaceutical industry competitiveness task force concluded a partnership agreement setting out the ground rules for both contract clinical trials and the non-commercial research collaborations to which industry contributes.

In 2004, the research for patient benefit working party drew attention to the immense contribution of United Kingdom research in the field of biomedical sciences and to the benefit to the national health service, patients and the wider public of encouraging internationally competitive clinical research, sponsored by the industry, and carried out in the NHS. It also recommended action to reverse some damaging trends.

To improve the environment for clinical research, the UK clinical research collaboration was created in 2004. It is a partnership between Government, the voluntary sector, patients, research funders and industry. Its work streams include developing networks within the NHS that will provide a platform for industry-contracted and collaborative research alongside NHS research, in areas identified as being critical to establishing the UK as a world leader in clinical research.

Community Pharmacies

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many community pharmacies in each London borough (a) opened and (b) closed in each year since 2000–01; and if she will make a statement. [7801]

Information on the number of community pharmacies opened and closed by London borough is not centrally collected. However, information is available by health authority (HA) prior to 2002 and from 2002, by primary care trust (PCT).

Table 1 shows the number of community pharmacies by London HA prior to 2002 and table 2 shows the number of community pharmacies by London PCTs from 2002 onwards.

Table 1: By London HA—2000–01 to 2001–02

Number of community pharmacies 2000–01 Number of community pharmacies 2001–02

HA

Total number of community pharmacies

Opened

Closed

Opened

Closed

Brent and Harrow

129

0

1

0

1

Ealing, Hammersmith and Hounslow

161

0

3

0

2

Hillingdon

62

0

0

0

0

Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster

148

0

2

0

0

Barnet, Enfield and Haringey

194

0

0

0

1

Camden and Islington

111

0

0

0

0

Barking and Havering

79

0

0

0

1

East London and City

166

0

1

0

1

Redbridge and Waltham Forest

108

0

1

0

0

Bexley Bromley and Greenwich

151

0

0

0

0

Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham

174

0

2

0

0

Croydon

68

0

1

0

0

Kingston and Richmond

75

0

1

0

0

Merton, Sutton and Wandsworth

143

0

0

0

2

Note:

Some HAs served more than one London borough.

Table 2: By London PCT—2002–03 to 2003–04

Number of community pharmacies 2002–03 Number of community pharmacies 2003–04

PCT

Number of pharmacies on establishment of PCTs in 2002

Opened

Closed

Opened

Closed

Brent Teaching

71

0

0

0

0

Ealing

69

0

0

1

0

Hammersmith and Fulham

41

0

0

0

1

Harrow

57

0

0

0

0

Hillingdon

62

0

0

0

0

Hounslow

50

0

0

0

0

Kensington and Chelsea

41

0

0

0

0

Westminster

106

0

0

0

1

Barnet

78

0

0

1

0

Camden

63

0

0

0

0

Islington

47

0

0

0

0

Enfield

59

0

0

0

0

Haringey

57

0

0

0

1

Barking and Dagenham

36

0

0

0

1

City and Hackney

65

0

0

0

0

Havering

43

0

0

0

0

Newham

60

0

0

0

0

Redbridge(19)

39

0

0

11

0

Tower Hamlets

43

0

0

0

1

Walthamstow, Leyton and Leytonstone(20)

46

0

46

Waltham Forest(21)

58

0

Bexley

47

0

0

0

1

Bromley

57

0

0

0

0

Greenwich

47

0

0

1

0

Lambeth

59

0

0

0

1

Lewisham

52

0

0

0

0

Southwark

63

0

0

0

0

Croydon

68

0

0

0

0

Kingston

29

0

0

0

0

Richmond and Twickenham

45

0

0

0

0

Sutton and Merton

77

0

0

0

0

Wandsworth

65

0

0

2

0

(19)Redbridge PCT previously sat in Redbridge and Waltham Forest HA and the total number of pharmacies for the HA as at 2001–02 was 108. In 2002, Redbridge PCT was established and initially had had 39 pharmacies, increasing by 11 with the establishing of Waltham Forest PCT in 2003, which had 58 pharmacies. It is useful to note that the combined figure of community pharmacies for both Redbridge and Waltham Forest PCTs in 2003–04 is equal to that of the previous HA total of 108.

(20)Walthamstow, Leyton and Leytonstone PCT no longer exists.

(21)Newly established PCT on 1 April 2003.

Dentistry

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) how many NHS dentists have retired in each year since 1997; [4359]

(2) how many NHS dentists have left the NHS in the last 12 months for which figures are available. [4360]

The number of dentists, who have come off the dental lists held by the Dental Practice Board (DPB) in England in the 12-month period ending 31 March 2005 was 1,008. However, many of these dentists would not have been providing exclusively national health service treatment and therefore the number does not reflect a loss of 1,008 whole time equivalent dentists to the service.

Dentists stop practising in general dental service (CDS) or personal dental service (PDS) for a number of reasons, including retirement and short-term breaks. Some dentists have not left indefinitely and intend to return. There is no requirement for a dentist to indicate why to indicate why they have stopped practising. Neither the Department nor the DPB records the reason why a dentist has stopped practising.

The number of individual dentists in England with open CDS or PDS contracts at 31 March 2005 was 20,088 compared to 19,294 at 31 March 2004.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many dental practices in Sussex are currently taking on new NHS patients; and how many were open to new NHS patients in 1997. [4472]

Information about dental practices, which were open to new patients in 1997 are not held centrally. Information about practices currently taking on new national health service patients is not centrally collected, but can be assessed either through NHS Direct or through local primary care trusts.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people in Lancashire are registered with an NHS dentist. [6309]

The information requested for the primary care trusts (PCTs) within the Lancashire area is shown in the table.

Primary care trusts

Number

Cumbria and Lancashire strategic health authority

771,011

Blackburn with Darwen

66,755

Blackpool

71,026

Burnley, Pendle and Rossendale

97,181

Chorley and South Ribble

102,058

Fylde

52,001

Hyndburn and Ribble Valley

46,901

Morecambe Bay

143,653

Preston

68,147

West Lancashire

55,231

Wyre

68,058

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients were registered with an NHS dentist in the City of Newcastle-upon-Tyne in each of the last five years; and what percentage of the population that represented in each year. [6322]

The information requested is shown in the table.

Patients registered with a national health service dentist in Newcastle primary care trust as at 30 September

Number of patients registered

Percentage of population registered with a dentist

2000

n/a

n/a

2001

141,552

53

2002

148,039

56

2003

144,531

54

2004(22)

148,691

56

n/a=not available.

1 2004 population data not available at this level—2003 data used. Sources: Dental Practice Board and Office for National Statistics.

Haringey Teaching Primary Care Trust

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many nurses are employed in each hospital located in the Haringey teaching primary care trust area; and if she will make a statement. [7800]

The information requested is shown in the table.

National health service hospital and community health services: total number of qualified nurses in the specified organisations as at 30 September 2004

Total nurses

Nurse consultant

Manager

Registered

sick nurse

Total nursing staff

4,950

3

117

134

Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust

1,003

0

39

0

Haringey PCT

324

1

13

0

North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

964

0

49

26

Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust

1,836

0

1

59

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

823

2

15

49

Registered midwife

District nurse

Health visitor

Total nursing staff

353

54

49

Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust

0

0

0

Haringey PCT

0

54

49

North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

127

0

0

Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust

72

0

0

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

154

0

0

Source:

Health and Social Care Information Centre Non-Medical Workforce Census 2004.

Hepatitis

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what reports have been made of adverse reactions to hepatitis B vaccination under the yellow card scheme in each year since the introduction of hepatitis B vaccine. [6972]

The safety of all medicines and vaccines, including hepatitis B vaccine, is continuously monitored by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), with expert advice from the Committee on Safety of Medicines. The MHRA uses a variety of data sources for this purpose including reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) which are reported through the yellow card scheme, clinical trials, published literature, epidemiological studies and periodic safety update reports from marketing authorisation holders.

The table shows the total number of suspected ADR reports received via the yellow card scheme from 1 January to 31 December for hepatitis B vaccine during each year since the first report was received in 1983.

Number of reports of suspected ADRs received per year for hepatitis B vaccine

Year report received

Number of reports

1983

5

1984

13

1985

14

1986

47

1987

107

1988

310

1989

182

1990

175

1991

168

1992

198

1993

227

1994

251

1995

235

1996

252

1997

226

1998

273

1999

193

2000

161

2001

148

2002

116

2003

122

2004

89

2005

46

It is important to note that a report of a suspected adverse reaction does not necessarily mean that it was caused by the drug or vaccine. Many factors have to be taken into account in assessing causal relationships including temporal association, the possible contribution of concomitant medication or a newly occurring or previously undiagnosed underlying illness.

Honours

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many officials currently in the Department received honours in the recent Queen's Birthday Honours List; and at what rank of honour. [5117]

I refer the hon. Member to the reply given by my right hon. Friend, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Mr. Hutton) on 22 June 2005, Official Report, column 1059W.

Hospital Beds (London)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) intensive care and (b) high dependency beds there were in each strategic health authority in London in January in each of the last three years. [8011]

Hospital Travel Costs Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what discussions her Department has had with hospital trusts on the implementation of its Hospital Travel Costs Scheme Guidance (2003) with reference to the promotion of the Hospital Travel Costs scheme to patients attending hospital for cancer treatment. [7938]

The Department does not collect any central information or issue guidance regarding the promotion of the Hospital Travel Costs scheme to patients attending hospital for cancer treatment.

Hospital-acquired Infections

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what role community matrons play in minimising MRSA in residential care and nursing homes; and if she will make a statement. [5897]

holding answer 22 June 2005

The Matron's Charter" launched in October 2004, reinforced the matron's role by setting out 10 key commitments to cleanliness, aimed at all staff in the national health service. Although the focus was on care in the hospital setting, many of the principles espoused are applicable across the whole spectrum of health care.

Residential care and nursing homes are not required to have community matrons on staff complements but may receive advice from community matrons on clinical issues.

The care homes regulations set out requirements for hygiene and infection control and care home providers are required to ensure that at all times suitably qualified, competent and experienced staff are working in the care home. These persons should receive training appropriate to their work and infection control is detailed in the induction standards set by Skills for Care and should be used by all new staff and those taking national vocational qualifications.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what research her Department has undertaken into possible links between use of agency and bank nursing staff within the NHS and prevalence of MRSA and other hospital-acquired infections. [6552]

The Department has conducted initial research to examine the links between the use of temporary nursing staff, hospital cleanliness and methicillin resistant"Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, the work is still in progress and results are not yet available.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the Department's policy is on the use of (a) disinfectants and (b) detergents for cleaning, with particular reference to control of hospital infections. [7735]

The use of disinfectants is a local decision and trusts should have local policies on disinfectant use focused on specific infection risks.

The National health service cleaning manual, which is endorsed by experts in cleaning and microbiology, recommends detergents for routine use, but recognises disinfectants are needed in particular circumstances.

As overuse of disinfectants can damage some fabrics and surfaces and may encourage the development of resistant organisms, the Department is supporting research into microfibre cleaning, which requires neither detergents nor disinfectant. Early results are encouraging. The cleaning manual will be updated following the trial.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many staff at the (a) Whittington hospital, (b) Royal Free hospital Hampstead, (c) North Middlesex university hospital and (d) Haringey teaching primary care trust St. Ann's hospital have been allocated to the treatment of (i) Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, (ii) Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus, (iii) Clostridium difficile Associated Diarrhoea, (iv) Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and (v) Glycopeptide-Resistant Enterococci in each of the last five years; and what proportion of the budget of each hospital was allocated to the treatment of each in each year. [7751]

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what research she has evaluated on possible risks of transmission of MRSA within hospitals on neck-ties worn by doctors and other hospital staff; and if she will make a statement. [7762]

holding answer 28 June 2005

Although studies by Nurkin et al have shown the presence of pathogens on neckties, the evidence indicates that inadequate hand hygiene is the main cause of methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission. However, health care workers should use appropriate protective clothing such as aprons to prevent transmission of micro-organisms to patients and contamination of their own clothing or skin.

Intensive Care (Enfield)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) intensive care and (b) high dependency beds there were in Enfield in the most recent year for which figures are available. [7613]

There are two hospitals in Enfield, Chase Farm, which is part of the Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals National Health Service Trust and North Middlesex university hospital, which is the only hospital in the North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust. Data on intensive care and high dependency beds is collected by trusts and the latest available data, as at 13 January 2005, is shown in the table.

Hospital trust

Number of intensive care beds

Number of high dependency beds

Barnet and Chase Farm

8

6

North Middlesex University

7

4

Meals on Wheels

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which social services authorities provide meals on wheels (a) cooked ready to eat, (b) frozen, (c) comprised of sandwiches and (d) cooked and chilled. [7205]

Mental Health Bill

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) when she expects to publish her response to the pre-legislative security committee on the draft Mental Health Bill; [8345]

(2) when she expects to publish the final version of the Mental Health Bill. [8346]

The Department is currently considering the recommendations of the report of the joint committee on the draft Mental Health Bill and a response will be published shortly. Following the publication of the Government's response, a Mental Health Bill will be presented before Parliament as soon as parliamentary time allows.

Mental Health Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) what arrangements are in place to ensure that people aged 65 years or over with mental health issues have access to (a) bereavement counselling, (b) assertive outreach teams, (c) crisis resolution teams and (d) community mental health teams; [6396]

(2) what reasons older people under the care of assertive outreach teams cease to receive the service when they reach of the age of 65. [7199]

The needs of older people with mental health problems are the focus of a standard in the national service framework for older people (2001), which is designed to ensure that the right services are there to meet the needs of older people with mental health problems whether they live at home, in residential care or are being cared for in hospital. Where an older person has severe mental illness due to a psychotic illness such as schizophrenia, they will require the packages of care set out in the national service framework for mental health, and the same standards should apply as for working age adults. For these people care should be provided within the framework of the care programme approach. Bereavement counselling services should be accessible by people of any age through referral by a general practitioner.

The Department's guidance on functionalised community teams, Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide (2001)", explains that such services are commonly for adults aged up to 65 years. This guidance specifies that for crisis resolution teams there should be flexibility in every locality to decide to treat those who fall outside this age group where appropriate. For assertive outreach teams, the same guidance states that the boundaries between different health care services should be flexible to respond to different needs. The Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide" also makes clear that as long as there is evidence of benefit, assertive outreach can continue indefinitely. The Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide for Community Mental Health Teams (2002)" requires age limits to be determined in line with locally agreed protocols for transitions from adolescent to adult and adult to older adult services.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what criteria were used to set the priorities for the National Service Framework for Mental Health, with particular reference to the age of sufferers; and what arrangements are in place to ensure that people with mental health problems continue to have access to services once they reach 65 years. [6398]

The national service framework for mental health (1999) concentrates on the mental health needs of working age adults up to 65 and touches on the needs of children and young people, highlighting areas where services for children and adults interact, for example the interface between services for 16 to 18-year-olds, and the needs of children with a mentally ill parent.

The needs of children and adolescents with mental health problems are the focus of a standard in the children's national service framework which gives guidance on what is envisaged in a comprehensive child and adolescent mental health service.

The needs of older people with mental health problems are the focus of a standard in the national service framework for older people (2001), which is designed to ensure that the right services are there to meet the needs of older people with mental health problems whether they live at home, in residential care or are being cared for in hospital. Where an older person has severe mental illness due to a psychotic illness such as schizophrenia, they will require the packages of care set out in the national service framework for mental health, and the same standards should apply as for working age adults. For these people care should be provided within the framework of the care programme approach.

The Department's guidance on the care programme approach, Effective Care Co-ordination in Mental Health Services" (1999), requires services to have in place clearly identified plans and protocols for meeting the needs of younger and older people moving from one service to another. The priorities and planning framework for the national health service 2003–06 includes a target to ensure that protocols are in place across all health and social care systems for the care and management of older people with mental health problems.

The annual performance ratings of mental health trusts carried out by the Healthcare Commission in 2004 and by the Commission for Health Improvement in 2003 employed performance indicators on the availability of clear protocols for transition between children's, adults' and older people's mental health services.

Missed Appointments (Lancashire)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients failed to turn up for (a) general practitioner and (b) hospital appointments in (i)Chorley and (ii) Lancashire in 2004–05. [7596]

The total number of missed out-patient appointments for the year 2004–05 in England was 5,707,288, or 11.3 per cent. Data for individual national health service trusts are available in the Library.

The Department does not collect data on the number of missed general practice appointments, but there is some evidence to suggest the number of missed appointments are falling.

MRI Scan

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average waiting time for a MRI scan is at each London hospital. [8204]

NHS Budget

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what her estimate is of the annual change in the NHS budget required to meet the higher cost associated with (a) an ageing population and (b) improved health care technology; and if she will make a statement. [8104]

In the report Securing our long term health: taking a long term view", Derek Wanless reported that the impact of ageing on future health expenditure is likely to be small compared with other cost drivers. The report also states that medical technology, including drugs and equipment, would contribute two to three percentage points to the annual rate of growth in health spending in the future, compared to an average of two percentage points a year over the previous 20 years.

NHS Staff

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many full-time equivalent (a) administrative staff and (b) temporary staff have been employed at (i) Whittington hospital, (ii) Royal Free hospital Hampstead, (iii) North Middlesex university hospital and (iv) Haringey teaching primary care trust St. Ann's hospital in each of the last five years; and if she will make a statement. [7761]

The information requested is shown in the table. St Ann's hospital is part of the Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust.

National health service hospital and community health services: Total clerical and administrative staff in Haringey teaching primary care trust area by contractual term as at 30 September each specified year -- Full-time equivalent

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Total administrative staff

1,326

1,595

1,794

1,979

2,075

Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust

RRP

n/a

176

249

278

352

Haringey PCT

5C9

n/a

114

114

139

161

North Middlesex Hospital NHS Trust

RAP

291

294

327

391

359

Royal Free NHS Trust

RAL

722

700

778

830

860

Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

RKE

312

311

326

341

342

n/a=not applicable

Note:

Full-time equivalent figures are rounded to the nearest whole number.

Source:

Health and Social Care Information Centre Non-Medical Workforce Census.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) what her estimate is of the total cost of suspending NHS staff in the most recent year for which figures are available; and what the average cost was of suspending one member of (a) medical staff and (b) non-medical clinical staff per annum for the most recent period for which figures are available; [5625]

(2) how many (a) medical and (b) non-medical clinical staff in the NHS have been (i) formally suspended and (ii) informally suspended from work in each year since 1997; and what steps she is taking to ensure that suspensions that occur are unavoidable; [5595]

(3) what the average length of time of suspensions from the NHS for (a) medical and (b) non-medical clinical staff was in the last year for which figures are available. [5596]

The information requested on formal and informal suspensions of medical and non-medical clinical staff and the length of those suspensions and their cost is not available and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

The National Audit Office provided information on clinical staff excluded from work in 2001 and 2002 in its report, The Management of Suspensions of Clinical Staff in NHS Hospital and Ambulance Trusts in England", which is available in the Library.

The most recent data collect by the National Clinical Assessment Service, now part of the National Patient Safety Agency, shows that, in the fourth quarter of 2004, 19 doctors were suspended for six months or more.

Northwick Park Hospital (Maternity)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of maternity services at Northwick Park hospital; and if she will make a statement. [7465]

The North West London hospitals national health service trust is actively addressing issues at the maternity unit at Northwick Park hospital. Last year, the trust, Brent primary care trust (PCT) and Harrow PCT invited the Healthcare Commission to help the trust with improvements. In April 2005, the Department, on the recommendation of the Healthcare Commission, introduced special measures at the unit to provide additional resource and external clinical support to accelerate the improvement programme.

I understand that the Healthcare Commission will shortly be publishing its report on these issues. The Department will consider the Commission's findings carefully and work with the trust and North West London strategic health authority to ensure that the appropriate action is taken.

Patient Care (Private Companies)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) if she will make a statement on the monitoring that is undertaken by her Department of the safety and quality of patient care provided by private companies delivering out of hours primary care services; [5949]

(2) how many adverse incidents have been recorded for GP out-of-hours services in each year since 1997; and if she will make a statement; [5950]

(3) if she will make a statement on the monitoring undertaken by her Department of the development of community out-of-hours services under the new GP contract. [5951]

The Department set quality requirements that came into effect from 1 January 2005. These set the minimum standards for the delivery of out-of-hours care. In line with Shifting the Balance of Power", it is for primary care trusts and strategic health authorities, not the Department, to monitor out-of-hours services against these quality requirements and, where necessary, take action in cases of adverse incidents or complaints.

Primary Care Trusts

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the funding per capita was for each primary care trust in England in 2004–05; what the budgeted funding per capita is for each trust in 2005–06; and what the average figure for all trusts is for each year. [4916]

I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to the hon. Member for East Worthing and Shoreham (Tim Loughton) today.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the funding was per head for each primary care trust area in England in 2004–05; and what the expected level is in 2005–06. [4622]

The information requested has been placed in the Library.

Allocations to primary care trusts (PCTs) are based on the population weighted for a number of factors. These factors include:

Age related need—to recognise that people tend to have a greater need as they grow older.

Additional needs—to reflect difference in health need over and above that accounted for by age.

Unavoidable difference in the cost of providing services.

The revenue allocations for PCTs increased from £49.3 billion for 2004–05 to £53.9 billion for 2005–06; and are due to increase further to £64 billion in 2006–07 and £70 billion in 2007–08. Over the two years covered by this further allocation, PCTs will receive an average increase of 19.5 per cent.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what sanctions are available to her should primary care trusts ignore guidance on the availability of medical treatment issued by her Department. [3950]

The primary responsibility for implementing national guidance rests with the national health service at local level. Compliance with national guidance by NHS organisations will be considered by the Healthcare Commission during their review and performance assessment process.

Retinopathy

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people with diabetes were screened for retinopathy on the NHS in (a) 2002, (b) 2003 and (c) 2004. [6671]

Figures from the national health service show that in 2003–04, 835,900 people with diabetes were screened for retinopathy and 1,076,400 in 2004–05. Figures for 2002–03 are not held centrally.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) what quality assurance protocols are in place for retinopathy screening on the NHS; [6672]

(2) how much central funding is planned to be allocated for (a) an external and independent quality assurance programme and (b) an internal quality assurance programme for retinal screening. [6673]

Quality assurance standards have been developed and piloted by the United Kingdom national screening committee's national screening programme for sight threatening retinopathy. A full list of the quality assurance standards can be found on the national screening programme's website at: www.nscretinopathy.org.uk

There is no central funding for quality assurance at this time. The diabetes national service framework has been fully costed and revenue funding to deliver the national and locally-determined targets has been included in primary care trust allocations.

Ward Sisters

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will make it her policy to employ ward sisters to improve cleanliness on hospital wards. [7975]

It is already the Department's policy that ward sisters are responsible, within their wards, for agreeing cleaning standards, making sure standards are met and working with cleaning staff to help them fulfil their roles. Ward sisters are responsible for the whole of the clinical and operational management of wards, and ensuring the ward is clean is just one part of their very wide remit.

West Hertfordshire Hospitals Trust

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of (a) the financial situation of the West Herts Hospitals Trust, (b) the implications for clinical services of its financial situation and (c) proposals for ward closures at Watford hospitals; what plans she has to provide additional (i) financial and (ii) other support to the Trust; and if she will make a statement. [3914]

In line with Shifting The Balance Of Power" strategic health authorities (SHAs) are responsible for the financial performance management of individual health organisations within their health economy. It is the responsibility of SHAs to deliver both overall financial balance for their local health communities and to ensure each and every body achieves financial balance.

I am advised that the West Hertfordshire Hospital National Health Service Trust is working with primary care trusts to agree a recovery plan to ensure that it delivers national targets, meets the national standards for high quality health care and achieves its statutory duties. Decisions on how this is best delivered within the West Hertfordshire health and social care system is a local decision and thus Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire SHA is working with the local NHS to support them in this process and ensure that there is the management capacity to produce and deliver the recovery plan.

I am also assured that the West Hertfordshire NHS Trust will continue to work hard to meet the standards laid down by the Healthcare Commission and that patient care will not be compromised.

Work-related Stress

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many cases of work-related stress have been reported in her Department in each of the last three years; how much compensation was paid to employees in each year; how many work days were lost due to work-related stress in each year; and at what cost; what procedures have been put in place to reduce work-related stress; and at what cost; and if she will make a statement. [7864]

The Department does not hold any data specifically on the number of reported cases of work-related stress. While the Department collects data on sickness absence, which includes stress, it is not possible to identify whether the cause of the stress related illness or anxiety was work related. It is not currently possible, therefore, to identify costs. However, the Department's recording systems are currently being developed in a way that will help identify which cases are potentially work-related at the time they are recorded. This will enable appropriate remedial action to be taken at the earliest opportunity.

The Department's settlement or compensation payments are made in respect of Employment (Industrial) Tribunal cases, which address a number of inter-related circumstances, of which work-related stress is only one element. Compensation payments on the grounds of work-related stress are not recorded separately.

The Department has a number of procedures already in place to help managers and staff to be aware of and reduce work-related stress and it is currently looking at further interventions.

Trade and Industry

Advantage West Midlands

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will list the projects submitted by the Rover Task Force to (a) Advantage West Midlands and (b) the Government Office of the West Midlands for possible funding; and how much has been requested to support each project. [7621]

Advantage West Midlands (AWM) is the vehicle which co-ordinates the funding directed by the MG Rover Task Force (MGRTF). The funding package is administered by other regional agencies such as the Learning and Skills Councils and Government Office for the West Midlands (GOWM).

To date, the following requests have been made by the MGRTF to AWM:

£250,000 to reopen and man the MG Rover Distribution Centres to allow suppliers to recover the consignment stocks they own;

£150,000 to retain for 12 weeks a team of MGR Human Resources staff, principally to prepare records of employment for all former workers for use when seeking jobs;

£202,000 to pay the wages of apprentices while alternative employment for them is Found;

£40,000 to support for a major jobs fair in Birmingham.

The MGRTF has also approved support of £10 million for the Advantage Transition Bridge Fund.

The MGRTF has also approved proposals from regional agencies for funding which includes:

Support for suppliers to retain employees. £3.7 million has been committed to date and is kept under review by the Task Force;

Establishment of a Manufacturing Hub" to try to ensure engineering manufacturing skills are not lost to the region by placing workers with such skills into posts requiring such skills and by incentivising businesses to recruit them;

Includes post-recruitment retraining, and assistance with long-distance commuting. Up to a maximum of £3.6 million (dependent on take-up);

Funding for former employees who wish to take up full-time vocational training (cash limited). Up to a maximum of £600,000.

Funding to support potential start-up businesses amongst former employees. Up to a maximum of £900,000.

Government Office for the West Midlands has received funding requests from the following projects to support the work of the MGRTF.

Project name

ERDF/ESF requested

Accelerate Extension

£4.94 million

Extension Cluster Action Plan

£l million

Wage Subsidy Scheme

£5 million ESF

Grants for R and D Extension

£1.5 million

ESF Over 50s

£1.50 million

Road Infrastructure

£5.1 million

Regional Repositioning (now called 'Marketing the Region')

£1.7 million

High Tech Corridor Support

£778,000

Community Network SW

£750,000

Longbridge Masterplanning

£750,000

SME Internationalisation Extension

Up to £1.4 million

Sustainable A38 regeneration employment opportunities

£500,000

Innovation Networks Extension

£430, 000

A number of projects are still under development by the MG Rover Task Force and regional partners.

Export Credits Guarantee Department

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much the Government have allocated to the Export Credits Guarantee Department in each of the last five years. [6792]

The cash generated for/(cash cost to) the Exchequer as a result of the Export Credits Guarantee Department's (ECGD's) operating activities, as published in schedule 4 to its Resource Accounts, in each of the last five years, is summarised in the following table. Figures in brackets represent Exchequer cash used to fund ECGD's Operating Activities; figures without brackets represent net cash receipts for the Exchequer, which include recoveries of past claims, interest paid by debtors in respect of those claims and premiums received in respect of ECGD's underwriting activities:

£ million

Cash generated/(used)

1999–2000

(107.1)

2000–01

(59.8)

2001–02

24.3

2002–03

327.8

2003–04

546.7

Mail Delivery (North London)

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions he has had with Royal Mail on performance in delivery of mail in north London; and if he will make a statement. [7806]

DTI Ministers and officials meet with representatives from Royal Mail on a regular basis to discuss a wide range of issues, including delivery performance issues.

First class quality of service for 2004–05 in the London N postcode area as a whole was:

Percentage

Q1

88.4

Q2

88.2

Q3

92.4

Q4

91.2

Cumulative

90.2

This was against a target of 92.5 percent. Nationally Royal Mail recorded its highest Q4 performance ever this year with a 92.8 percent. service. Royal Mail's chairman and chief executive have assured Ministers that the company's board will continue to give quality of service top priority.

MG Rover

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will publish (a) the written records of conversations and (b) correspondence between (i) Ministers and (ii) officials from his Department and senior representatives of the Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation that took place in the week commencing Monday 4 April. [5868]

It would be inappropriate to release this information at this time as it would breach commercial confidentiality.

Minimum Wage

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what penalties have been imposed on companies found paying their employees below the minimum wage. [6631]

Since the minimum wage was introduced in April 1999 the Inland Revenue have served 133 penalty notices on employers who they found were not paying their workers the minimum wage.

A penalty notice imposes a financial penalty equal to twice the hourly amount of the adult minimum wage per worker for each day of non-payment of the minimum wage.

Post Offices (Hornsey and Wood Green)

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many post offices were in operation in Hornsey and Wood Green in each of the last 10 years. [8404]

This is an operational matter for Post Office Ltd. (POL) and the chief executive has been asked to reply direct to the hon. Member.

UK Trade and Investment

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what commercial services UK Trade and Investment provides to companies in relation to identifying potential agents in export markets. [7909]

UK Trade and Investment provides information on potential agents in two main ways. First, off the shelf lists of companies may be available in the UK, although the details may not have been recently validated. Secondly, our Overseas Market Introduction Service (OMIS) provides bespoke lists that can be validated at the request of the customer. Advice on the best ways of doing business in the market concerned is also included. It is for customers themselves to determine the best agent in the light of their individual needs and circumstances.

Unwanted Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will take steps to curb the growth of unsolicited postal applications for credit cards. [6962]

Consumers can register with the Mailing Preference Service to have their name and home address removed from lists used by the direct mail industry. On credit cards themselves, the Banking Code provides that customers' names and addresses will not be passed on to any company for marketing purposes unless permission is specifically given by that customer. In addition, since 31 May 2005, all credit card applications must have a separate document detailing the key features of the card. This will enable the consumer to make a more informed decision about the suitability of the product prior to the conclusion of any agreement.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions he has had with Royal Mail on adopting a service to restrict delivery of harmful or unwanted overseas correspondence; and what representations he has received on this matter. [7908]

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry

(1) how much unwanted correspondence was withheld from delivery as a result of the co-operation of Royal Mail Holdings plc with the Mail Preference Service (MPS) in the last period for which figures are available; and from how many users of the MPS; [7926]

(2) how many users have been registered with the Mail Preference Service in each of the last 10 years. [7927]

The Government do not hold this information. The Mailing Preference Service is a free service funded by the direct mail industry to enable consumers to have their names and addresses in the UK removed from or added to lists used by the industry.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what powers are available to limit the delivery of unwanted or harmful mail sent from (a) within the UK and (b) overseas. [7928]

The Postal Services Act 2000 contains powers that prohibit the sending of certain articles by post and provide postal operators with various powers to detain postal packets, forward them to HM Customs and Excise, refuse transmission of packets, detain and open them, return to sender or forward to their destination or destroy or dispose of packets.

Under section 89 of the Act a universal service provider may make a scheme that contains provisions prohibiting the transmission of certain articles by post.