Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 441: debated on Monday 23 January 2006

Written Answers to Questions

Monday 23 January 2005

National Parks

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much has been allocated to each national park for each year since 1997. [43705]

Defra has provided the following National Park Grants (figures prior to 2000–01 are estimates):

Authority

£

Broads Authority

1996–97

2,133,333

1997–98

2,070,667

1998–99

2,000,000

1999–2000

2,224,000

2000–01

2,212,000

2001–02

2,411,261

2002–03

2,801,437

2003–04

3,196,877

2004–05

3,065,680

2005–06

3,933,182

Dartmoor National Park Authority

1996–97

2,433,333

1997–98

2,789,333

1998–99

2,589,333

1999–2000

2,858,667

2000–01

2,863,000

2001–02

3,127,480

2002–03

3,721,705

2003–04

4,177,323

2004–05

3,965,325

2005–06

4,308,058

Exmoor National Park Authority

1996–97

2,032,000

1997–98

2,224,000

1998–99

2,142,667

1999–2000

2,377,333

2000–01

2,369,000

2001–02

2,582,842

2002–03

3,059,765

2003–04

3,518,950

2004–05

3,290,756

2005–06

3,616,422

Lake District National Park Authority

1996–97

3,700,000

1997–98

3,897,333

1998–99

3,781,333

1999–2000

4,144,000

2000–01

4,180,000

2001–02

4,640,000

2002–03

5,460,856

2003–04

6,107,102

2004–05

6,050,672

2005–06

6,290,679

New Forest National Park Authority(1)

2005–06

3,517,297

Northumberland National Park Authority

1996–97

1,448,000

1997–98

1,732,000

1998–99

1,578,667

1999–2000

1,769,333

2000–01

1,745,000

2001–02

1,928,560

2002–03

2,419,922

2003–04

2,882,555

2004–05

2,702,191

2005–06

3,010,044

North York Moors National Park Authority

1996–97

2,706,667

1997–98

2,906,667

1998–99

2,905,333

1999–2000

3,380,000

2000–01

3,212,000

2001–02

3,565,239

2002–03

4,224,936

2003–04

4,677,842

2004–05

4,678,157

2005–06

4,933,864

Peak District National Park Authority

1996–97

5,294,667

1997–98

5,414,667

1998–99

5,413,333

1999–2000

5,904,000

2000–01

5,984,000

2001–02

6,223,073

2002–03

6,721,617

2003–04

7,361,069

2004–05

7,422,471

2005–06

7,542,550

Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority

1996–97

2,605,333

1997–98

2,805,333

1998–99

2,912,000

1999–2000

3,092,000

2000–01

3,101,000

2001–02

3,442,378

2002–03

4,583,616(2)

2003–04

5,237,283(2)

2004–05

4,580,902

2005–06

4,906,870

(1) National Park created 1 March 2005.

2 Includes £500,000 capital grant towards new office accommodation.

Political Honours

To ask the Prime Minister why he abolished the political honours scrutiny committee. [44550]

I refer my right hon. Friend to recommendation 10 of "Reform of the Honours System" (cm 6479). Copies are available in the Libraries of the House.

Working Hours

To ask the Prime Minister what EU regulations govern his working hours; what opt outs exist to provide for him to surpass working hour regulations; what court cases are currently before the European courts reviewing the legality of these opt outs; and if he will make a statement. [43426]

Holders of political offices in the UK are not defined as "workers" under the terms of European working time legislation, and are therefore not subject to the working time limits: as such, they do not need to opt out.

Iraq

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will make a statement on the training the UK is giving to Iraqi security forces. (44083) [44083]

The United Kingdom is engaged in a number of training initiatives with the Iraqi security forces in Multi National Division (South East) and in Baghdad to enable the Iraqi Government to progressively take on responsibility for security.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what studies have been undertaken by his Department of the effects of depleted uranium on (a) Coalition forces, (b) Iraqi forces and (c) civilians in Iraq since May 2003; and if he will make a statement. [44461]

Information on the Ministry of Defence Depleted Uranium research programme was announced to the House on 14 March 2002, Official Report, columns 1179–80W. A more detailed description of the research has been published on the Departmental website (http://www.mod.uk/issues/depleted_uranium/index.htm). In addition to this, in June 2003, MOD scientists completed a preliminary technical assessment of a number of Iraqi tanks thought to have been struck by DU rounds. Very low levels of DU were found in the vicinity of and on the tanks. I refer my hon. Friend to the answer given in another place by my noble Friend the then Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Defence (Lord Bach) on 26 May 2004, Official Report, column 196WA. Biological monitoring has also been carried out on several hundred UK troops and civilians involved in operations in Iraq. No DU was detected in anyone other than a small number of personnel who received shrapnel injuries in an incident involving friendly fire.

This research is not specifically directed at examining the effects on Iraqis as the health of the Iraqi people is primarily the responsibility of their Government. However, as announced in the House on 29 January 2001, Official Report, column 61W, in relation to operations in the Balkans, the UK will provide help and advice to assist the relevant authorities to decide what action, if any, is needed. This also applies to Iraq. As part of this commitment, MOD has provided United Nations Environment Programme with information on its use of DU munitions in Iraq in 2003 and with a report of its monitoring activities in June 2003.

Defence Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what recent representations he has received on the future of defence training; and if he will make a statement. [44087]

The Defence Training Review is a complex programme with many stakeholders and interested parties. I have received many representations but as I have said in previous replies, a rigorous evaluation of bid proposals is currently underway.

Future Aircraft Carriers

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the new aircraft carrier programme. [44090]

As my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence announced on 14 December, we have taken major steps forward in our plans for the Future Aircraft Carriers.

We have completed the detailed assessment work and have committed to the £300 million demonstration phase.

An innovative shipbuilding strategy has been agreed which is central to our Defence Industrial Strategy with separate "super blocks" built at four yards and final assembly at Rosyth.

This will create and sustain some 10,000 jobs in the United Kingdom.

We are on course to provide the UK armed forces with the largest and most powerful warships ever constructed in the UK, and an expeditionary capability unparalleled outside of the US.

DCAE Cosford

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact (a) closure and (b) downsizing of DCAE Cosford may have on the (i) Shropshire and (ii) West Midlands economies. [38990]

The Defence Training Review is currently evaluating the bidding consortia's proposals. Until this phase is complete and a decision has been taken to select a preferred training partner, I am not in a position to make any detailed comment on the potential impact on any site or region of the United Kingdom.

RAF Leeming

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the future of RAF Leeming. [44499]

As stated in my written ministerial statement of 17 January 2006, Official Report, column 25WS, I have decided, subject to trade unions consultation, that the RAF communications hub will be formed at RAF Leeming. This means that communications personnel would move from RAF Sealand to RAF Leeming by April 2006. Communications personnel from RAF Brize Norton and RAF High Wycombe would move to RAF Leeming in 2007.

Night Flying Restrictions

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether it is his policy to allow the overall number of night flights into and out of Heathrow airport to increase. [43185]

We have published a consultation paper, "Night Flying Restrictions at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted Airports, Stage 2. of Consultation on Restrictions to apply from 30 October 2005". This invited views on proposals for future night flight restrictions. We are considering responses to that consultation and will announce our decisions in due course.

Public Transport

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the merits of a public transport (a) hub and (b) corridor for Aylesbury; and if he will make a statement. [43310]

A public transport hub proposal for Aylesbury was provisionally approved for Community Infrastructure Fund (CIF) bid funding in March 2005. Ministers are expecting to announce the final decision on this shortly, as well as on other transport CIF proposals in Aylesbury.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much money has been spent on improvements in transport infrastructure in Gravesham since 1997. [43275]

Since the introduction of Local Transport Plans in 2000, Kent county council has received around £160 million for local transport improvements and maintenance schemes. In addition the county council has £16 million for the Kent Fasttrack public transport scheme.

Between 1997 and 2000 the county council received approximately £159 million for local transport capital investment. £16 million was provided for the South Thames-side Development Route Section 4 (some of which is included in the £159 million). The Department does not have the data to identify a figure for all local transport investment in Gravesham.

The Highways Agency's improvements have included the widening of the A2 between Bean and Cobham Phase One, costing £23 million. This work was completed in 2005.

Kent has benefited from the new trains and associated power supply and depot upgrades delivered as part of the Mark 1 "slam door" stock replacement programme, the total value of the investment (benefiting Kent and other parts of London and the South East) being in the region of £2 billion.

The Gravesham constituency has also benefited from the £4.6 billion Channel Tunnel Rail Link project, which includes a major new station within Gravesham constituency at Ebbsfleet, which will be served by international trains to Paris and Brussels from 2007 and high speed domestic trains to St. Pancras from 2009 (journey time Ebbsfleet to St. Pancras 16 minutes).

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what steps he is taking to improve access to public transport for disabled people in Gravesham. [43276]

We have introduced "accessibility planning" into the local transport planning process to encourage local authorities and other agencies to assess more systematically whether people can access transport services in their areas. This process covers all forms of transport from buses, coaches and taxis to cycling and walking networks. Making provision for disabled people is a condition against which the resulting Local Transport Plans (LTPs) are assessed.

At a local level, we are supporting the continued introduction of low floor buses in Gravesham. The Kickstart project (services 495/498 between Kings Farm, Christianfields, Gravesend Town Centre, Pepper Hill and Bluewater), launched in March 2005, introduced low floor single deck buses to the route replacing minibuses which were inaccessible to wheelchair users. The introduction of the new vehicles was combined with a programme of work to introduce raised kerbs and bus boarders on this route.

The Department continues to invest in accessibility improvements in Gravesham through LTP funding. Kent county council, Gravesham's local bus provider, Arriva and the Gravesham Access Group (which represents disabled people in the district) work in close partnership to identify priorities for funding. This includes identifying stops which require raised kerbing, dropped kerbs or hard standing.

LTP funding has also resulted in a £14.5 million investment in Fastrack, the new bus based transit system serving Gravesend, which will have fully accessible vehicles and roadside infrastructure designed in accordance with current best practice. Due to commence in March 2006, Fastrack will have bus boarders at all Gravesham stops to complement the fleet of new low-floor vehicles, providing level access for all passengers. All Fastrack stops will also be fitted with real time information displays.

Arriva estimates that at present over 70 per cent. of their Gravesham buses are low floor. They also endeavour to ensure that all staff receive disability awareness training.

Rail services in Gravesham are also generally accessible, a situation that will be enhanced with the completion of Ebbsfleet station. When opened, this station will offer high standards of accessibility and will be served by trains which meet the Rail Vehicle Accessibility Regulations 1998 (RVAR) operating on the Integrated Kent Franchise. This will provide fast access to Stratford International and London St. Pancras stations (both of which will be fully accessible) and also south to Ashford International together with access to 'Eurostar' services to Belgium and France. The new station will have ample parking including convenient spaces reserved for disabled passengers.

More generally disabled people in Gravesham, as elsewhere in the country, will also benefit from the provisions in the Disability Discrimination Act 2005 (DDA 2005). We have already laid regulations which will, from 4 December 2006, lift the transport exemption in Part 3 of the for land-based public transport, vehicle hire, breakdown services and vehicles used on leisure and tourism transport services. We will also be consulting shortly on draft regulations to set an "end date" of no later than 1 January 2020 when all trains will have to meet RVAR and to apply those regulations to older trains when they are refurbished.

Rail Modernisation Fund

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much of the Rail Modernisation Fund had been spent at the end of the financial year 2004–05. [40860]

We have invested some £7.7 billion between 2001–05 and plan to invest some £19 billion further by 2009.

Tram Schemes

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much direct Government funding has been allocated to proposed tram schemes in (a) Merseyside, (b) Manchester and (c) West Yorkshire; and what meetings he has attended where schemes were discussed in the past 10 months. [37885]

holding answer 15 December 2005

I refer the hon. Member to my Statement to the House on 29 November 2005, Official Report, column 17WS, about Merseytram, and the Secretary of State's Statement on 3 November 2005, Official Report, column 60WS, about Leeds Supertram. These Statements made clear that funding was no longer available for these schemes.

I also refer the hon. Member to the Secretary of State for Transport's Statement on 16 December 2004, Official Report, column 152WS, about Manchester Metrolink which confirmed that £520 million public funding would be made available to deal with transport problems in areas covered by Phase III. The £520 million budget included an up-front local contribution of £60 million, and £70 million to be recouped through deductions of £7 million per annum from Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive's Local Transport Plan allocations, for 10 years.

The Secretary of State has attended frequent meetings with ministerial colleagues and officials to discuss a whole range of departmental policies.

Transport 2010 Document

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what progress has been made towards meeting the targets in the Transport 2010 plan for (a) increased rail passenger kilometres and (b) increased rail freight. [40857]

Annual passenger rail use has increased from 38.2 billion passenger kilometres in April 2001 to 42.4 billion passenger kilometres at the end of March 2005. This represents an increase of 11 per cent.

The amount of rail freight has increased from 18.1 billion net tonne kilometres in 2000–01 to 20.6 billion net tonne kilometres in 2004–05. This is an increase of almost 14 per cent.

Africa (Debt Repayments)

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the value of bilateral debt repayments to the United Kingdom by each country in Africa was for (a) the calendar year 2005 and (b) financial year 2004–05; and what the expected value is for 2005–06. [42085]

The following table shows the official bilateral debt payments received from African countries, and the debts cancelled, by the UK Government for the financial years 2004–05 and 2005–06. The figures for the 2005 calendar year are not held centrally within HM Treasury, DfID or the ECGD, and to gather all the information would incur disproportionate costs.

£ million

2004–05

2005–06

Market

Recoveries

Debt forgiveness

Recoveries

Debt forgiveness

Algeria

17.800

20.227

Botswana

0.02

Cameroon

5.782

Cote d'Ivoire

0.956

D R Congo

2.539

Egypt

12.153

12.966

Ethiopia

10.551

Gabon

8.249

19.155

Ghana

66.056

Kenya

2.422

0.595

Madagascar

24.064

Malawi

0.079

Morocco

8.203

6.471

Niger

4.967

Nigeria

105.954

1,052.662

1,142.412

Republic of Congo

74.000

0.153

Senegal

0.143

0.881

Sierra Leone

0.052

0.001

Zambia

162.390

Zimbabwe

0.6

0.08

Totals

155.383

351.579

1,112.223

1,143.294

1. Debt forgiveness figures as at 31 December 2005. There may be additional debt forgiveness before March 2006, but this cannot be estimated at present.

2. The payments by Zimbabwe were for ODA loans given by DfID.

3. The data for Botswana and Kenya include payments to CDC, formerly known as the Commonwealth Development Corporation.

4. Debt relief figures do not include payments from DFID to ECGD to allow 100 per cent. cancellation of ECGD loans and reimbursements under the Hold in Trust policy. These amounted to about £12.5 million in 2004–05. The estimate for 2005–06 is £1.2 million.

Business Rates

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what amendments have been made to (a) regulations, (b) primary legislation and (c) legislation relating to the levying of business rates on domestic properties used in whole or part of business purposes since May 1997. [42836]

I have been asked to reply.

None of the provisions in primary legislation or regulations which relate specifically to the rating of properties which are used for both domestic and non-domestic purposes has been amended since 1997.

Economic Inactivity (Beverley and Holderness)

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many people in Beverley and Holderness under the age of 25 years were economically inactive in each year since 1997. [44318]

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the national statistician who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 23 January 2006

As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Question concerning economic inactivity. (44318)

The Office for National Statistics compiles statistics of inactivity for local areas from the annual local area Labour Force Survey (LFS) and the Annual Population Survey (APS) following International Labour Organisation definitions.

The attached table shows the numbers of inactive people aged 16 to 24, resident in the Beverley and Holderness constituency, for the 12 month periods ending February 1998 to February 2004 from the annual local area LFS, and for the 12 months ending March 2005 from the APS. The table also shows the figures as a percentage of the resident population aged 16 to 24.

These estimates, as with any from sample surveys, are subject to a margin of uncertainty. Changes in the estimates from year to year should be treated with particular caution.

Number of economically inactive persons aged 16 to 24 resident in the Beverley and Holderness parliamentary constituency

Economically inactive persons aged 16 to 24

Twelve months ending:

Level (thousand)

Rate (percentage)

February 1998

3

32

February 1999

3

31

February 2000

1

14

February 2001

2

28

February 2002

2

39

February 2003

2

20

February 2004

2

27

March 2005

4

40

Notes:

1. Estimates are subject to sampling variability.

2. Changes from year-to-year should be treated with particular caution.

Source:

Annual local area Labour Force Survey; Annual Population Survey.

Private Members' Clubs

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many (a) working men's clubs and (b) other private members' clubs there were in England in the most recent year for which figures are available, broken down by local authority. [43532]

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 23 January 2006

As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question concerning how many(a) working men's clubs and (b) other private members' clubs there were in England in the most recent year for which figures are available, broken down by local authority. (43532)

Working men's clubs are included within the standard industrial classification (SIC) for licensed clubs. Private members' clubs are included within activities of other membership organisations not elsewhere classified. I am placing a table in the House of Commons Library showing the figures for licensed clubs (SIC 55401) and for activities of other membership organisations (SIC 91330).

These figures are based on the criteria used in the National Statistics publication "UK Business: Activity, Size and Location for 2005", published on the National Statistics website: www.statistics.gov.uk/ukbusiness, and relate to the number of local units operated by businesses registered for VAT as at March 2005.

All figures have been rounded to the nearest five to avoid disclosure.

VAT

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what items are exempt from VAT. [44652]

VAT exemption applies to a wide range of goods and services. Among the major categories are certain supplies of, or related to: land; insurance; financial services; postal services; education; health and welfare; charities; burial and cremation; betting and gaming; admission to certain cultural bodies; and subscriptions to trade unions and professional and public interest bodies.

The full list of supplies of goods and services which are exempt from VAT can be found in schedule 9 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 which is reproduced in HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) Notice 701/39, 'VAT liability law', which can found on HMRC's website at www.hmrc.gov.uk

Afghanistan

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what plans he has to provide alternative cash crops for opium producers in Afghanistan; and if he will make a statement. [42997]

DFID leads the British Government's efforts to develop alternative livelihoods in Afghanistan. In the financial year of 2005–06, DFID is to spend over £45 million for this purpose. This is an almost tenfold increase on the amount spent in 2003–04. in the financial year of 2006–07, spending is expected to continue at similar levels.

A proportion of this funding will continue to be specifically targeted on improving agricultural opportunities for Afghan farmers. This includes research to help identify, test and implement new crops and technologies. Innovative ways for farmers to make a living are also being pursued. Examples include apricot drying, honey bee keeping, and the introduction of fruit tree nurseries and greenhouses for vegetable production. DFID has also jointly funded, with United States Agency for International Development (USAID), a $25 million nationwide programme to increase access by over 500,000 farmers to seeds and fertiliser for alternative crops.

At the same time as developing agricultural opportunities, and in the interests of sustainability, it is important to also develop non-farm alternative livelihoods. DFID will continue to support activities which identify sustainable economic alternatives and social incentives to enable farmers to stop growing poppy.

Departmental Assets

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development if he will list the items valued at over £100 that have been reported as stolen from buildings occupied by his Department in the past 12 months. [43437]

The items reported as stolen from DFID buildings over the last year, valued at over £100, are as follows.

Number

Compaq IPAC pocket PC

1

Lamposts

4

Bicycles

3

Laptop computers

6

Departmental Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what expenditure on (a) buildings and (b) insurance of buildings and staff was by (i) his Department and (ii) each (A) non-departmental public body, (B) executive agency and (C) other public body for which his Department is responsible in (1) Scotland, (2) Wales, (3) each English region and (4) Northern Ireland in each of the last three financial years; and what the planned expenditure is for 2005–06 in each case. [40097]

In accordance with Government accounting policy, DFID does not normally insure its buildings or staff. The following figures are for expenditure on its headquarters buildings in UK only.

Financial year

£

2002–03

8,748,344

2003–04

8,720,705

2004–05

9,668,959

2005–06 (Forecast)

9,450,000

Information on overseas offices is not held centrally and cannot be obtained without incurring a disproportionate cost.

DFID is not responsible for any other non-departmental public bodies (NDPB)s or agencies, but is responsible for CDC (formerly Commonwealth Development Corporation), a self-financing public corporation, based in London. The relevant figures for CDC are:

£

Buildings

Insurance

2003

613,700

759,600

2004

963,600

648,700

2005 (Forecast)

262,000

308,000

2006 (Budget)

271,000

340,000

Gleneagles Commitments

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what mechanisms he has in place for his Department to follow up the donor commitments made by the G8 member countries at Gleneagles in 2005. [43813]

The Government are committed to ensuring that G8 pledges made at Gleneagles are implemented. DFID is involved in the implementation of specific initiatives: for example, the Infrastructure Consortium for Africa and the Investment Climate Facility. DFID is also working with others to ensure effective monitoring mechanisms to hold governments to account for delivery of their commitments and to assess results.

At a national level, the "Gleneagles Implementation Plan" sets out the milestones the UK believes need to be achieved in 2006 to set us on the right track for delivery of the Gleneagles' commitments. This Plan has been placed in the Libraries of the House and will be updated monthly to show further progress. At the international level, the Africa Partnership Forum (APF) will monitor, review and report progress against the respective commitments by Africa and its development partners (not just the G8), on the basis of a Joint Action Plan now being developed. As one of the 2005 APF Co-Chairs, DFID, on behalf of the UK, has been closely involved in the development of this Plan and we remain fully committed to this process. We are also supporting the Archbishop of Capetown's proposal for an 'African Monitor', which will track the implementation of commitments, and their impact, through a network of civil society groups.

Identity Fraud

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what training the Department has provided for (a) front desk and (b) administrative staff in relation to identity fraud. [41283]

Fraud awareness, including identity fraud is included in the induction training for all staff appointed by DFID.

In relation to front desk staff, all visitors to the Department have to be identified and then accompanied by a member of staff throughout their visit.

Guidelines are in place for administrative staff carrying out identity checks as part of the appointment and security clearance procedures for all new staff. These include sight of passports, birth certificates and other data that is checked as part of our security vetting process.

Priority Countries (Funding)

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how much funding has been allocated to budget support for each of his Department's 20 priority countries; and how much of that funding has been allocated to (a) health and (b) education. [42449]

DFID does not have a classification list of priority countries as such but in our public service agreement we do have a number of key countries in Africa and Asia, 25 in total, in which we monitor progress towards the Millennium Development Goals. These countries have been chosen because they are DFID partner countries with high numbers of poor people and receive the largest proportions of total DFID spending in these continents.

These countries are set out in the following table along with the amounts of poverty reduction budget support received over the past five years. The amount of budget support allocated to the specific sectors of health and education are detailed in the second table but the majority of this funding is provided as general budget support and not allocated to any specific sector.

Poverty reduction budget support for DFID PSA countries £ million

2000–01

2001–02

2002–03

2003–04

2004–05

Africa

Congo (Dem Rep)

0

0

0

0

0

Ethiopia

0

0

10

20

45

Ghana

40

25

20

25

35

Kenya

15

0

0

0

0

Lesotho

0

0

0

0

0

Malawi

30

12.5

0

10

15

Mozambique

15.7

25.7

14.7

20.3

35.8

Nigeria

0

0

0

0

0

Rwanda

25.4

18

22

18.8

34.3

Sierra Leone

19.5

10

10

10

12

South Africa

0

0

0

0

0

Sudan

0

0

0

0

0

Tanzania

40

35

45

60

65

Uganda

60

47

29.5

30

35

Zambia

15

0

0

4

13

Zimbabwe

0

0

0

0

0

Asia

Afghanistan

0

0

0

0

0

Bangladesh

0

0

6.6

0

29.8

Cambodia

0

0

0

0

0

China

0

0

0

0

0

India

0

65

30

75

51.3

Indonesia

0

0

0

0

0

Nepal

0

0

0

0

2.1

Pakistan

0

20

20

50

7.5

Vietnam

0

0

0

10

20

Sector allocated expenditure on Health and Education through PRBS £ million

2000–01 2001–02 2002–03

Health

Education

Health

Education

Health

Education

Mozambique

5.7

5.7

0

4.7

0

Uganda

0

15

0

12

0

12

Gambia

0

0

0

0

0

India

0

0

0

0

0

Nepal

0

0

0

0

0

Pakistan

0

0

0

0

0

£ million

2003–04

2004–05

Health

Education

Health

Education

Mozambique

5.3

0

5.3

0

Uganda

0

0

0

0

Gambia

0

4

0

4

India

0

20

0

51.3

Nepal

0

0

0

2.1

Pakistan

15

0

7.5

0

Private Members' Bills

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development if he will list private Members' Bills introduced (a) under Standing Order No. 14(6), (b) Standing Order No. 23 and (c) Standing Order No. 57 which were (i) supported and (ii) opposed by his Department in each session since 1997–98. [41637]

In July 2005, the hon. Member for Stone (Mr. Cash) introduced the International Development (Anti-corruption Audit) Bill under Standing Order 57. This was tabled for Second Reading on 14 October and again on 28 October but was not reached. In 2002–03 and 2003–04 no private Member's Bills were introduced which fell under the departmental responsibility of DFID. No information is held about private Member's Bills presented prior to this time.

Sub-Saharan Africa

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what the United Kingdom aid budget to sub-Saharan Africa excluding debt cancellation was for (a) the 2005 calendar year and (b) financial year 2004–05; and what the expected budget is for 2005–06. [42084]

In 2004–05 the UK's gross public expenditure on development in sub-Sarahan Africa amounted to £1.18 billion. This figure is reported in table 11 in our annual publication, Statistics in International Development (SID).

Of this figure, £269.8 million represents debt relief to countries in sub-Sarahan Africa. This comprises of: £246.6 million for the Export Credit Guarantee Department (ECGD), £9 million for CDC (see SID Table 24), £1.7 million for DFID (see SID Table 12.1) and £12.5 million in payments to allow 100 per cent. cancellation of ECGD loans and reimbursements under the Hold in Trust policy (see SID Table 23).

This means that in total, the UK channelled £911 million of bilateral assistance to sub-Sarahan Africa, if bilateral debt relief of all forms is excluded. Note that the UK also spent money in Africa via multilateral agencies, however this amount is not disaggregated to show how much went to Africa. The UK also made a payment to the heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) trust fund amounting to £42.1 million in 2004–05 for the cancellation of multilateral debt.

Aid can also be reported according to the international classification 'official development assistance' (ODA). This is undertaken on a calendar year basis. In 2004 (the latest year for which data are available), the UK ODA expenditure for sub-Sarahan Africa was £1.236 billion of which £387 million was debt relief. Excluding debt relief, the total ODA for sub-Sarahan Africa was £849 million.

The target for the bilateral programme (excluding debt relief) for 2005–06 in sub-Sarahan Africa is £1 billion.

Water and Sanitation (Funding)

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development pursuant to his answer of 14 November 2005, Official Report, column 871W, on water and sanitation (funding), what agreements were made by EU member states at the December European Council on allocations of aid. [42736]

The 15–16 December European Council endorsed the "European Consensus on Development" that was agreed by EU Development Ministers on 22 November at the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC). In May 2005, member states made commitments that should see annual EU aid double to over €66 billion per year by 2010.

The first part of the consensus sets out a common development vision to guide all EU member states development co-operation activities. Under the consensus, lease developed an low income countries will be given priority in terms of overall resource allocation. It states that resources will be allocated in an objective and transparent way, based on the needs and performance of the beneficiary countries, taking into account specific situations.

Part 2 of the consensus sets out the revised EC Development Policy Statement to guide EC aid. It makes clear that the Community will apply all the principles in Part 1. It also provides more detail on needs criteria and performance criteria. The needs criteria include population, income per capita and the extent of poverty, income distribution and the level of social development. The performance criteria include political, economic and social progress, progress in good governance and the effective use of aid. The 22 November GAERC also asked the Commission and member states to publish aid projections by type and country over the next three years and possibly over a longer period.

The European consensus states that investing in areas including health, water management and infrastructure are among the top priorities for combating poverty. Part 2 sets out the aims of the EC's 'integrated water resources management' policy framework which is designed to ensure a supply of sufficient, good quality drinking water, adequate sanitation and hygiene for all human beings.

The December European Council also adopted the EU-Africa Strategy. The strategy re-emphasised the EU's commitment to facilitate access to water and sanitation in Africa.

Yemen

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what recent assessment his officials have made of the poverty reduction strategy in Yemen. [43889]

The Department for International Development is providing £3 million over three years in support of the Yemen poverty reduction strategy (PRS). This includes actively supporting development of the 3rd PRS (which is known as the Development Plan for Poverty Reduction-DPPR).

DFID officials assess the content and implementation of the PRS/ DPPR at key stages; for example, when the Government releases a monitoring report, and in response to the needs assessment for the DDPR, which will be based on the Millennium Development Goals. Together with other donors, we will also assess the content of the DPPR when it is released and throughout its implementation. Concerns we have raised include the need to strengthen:

links between the PRS/ DPPR and a comprehensive, transparent budget;

strategies to address political and social exclusion, gender inequality, and severe poverty;

attention to governance reforms and under-emphasised fields such as justice;

evidence of impacts of the PRS in key sectors such as health and education; and

indicators on which to gauge progress.

In addition to our assessments of the PRS/ DPPR, DFID's support is particularly geared to enabling Yemenis themselves to assess and influence these strategies. Through Oxfam and other partners, we are supporting civil society groups to: shape the content of the plans; ensure that they are in the interests of the poor and promote gender equality; and monitor and hold the Government accountable for delivering on the commitments they contain.

Zimbabwe

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how much money the British Government gave under their aid programme in Zimbabwe to (a) the Republic Police Grant, (b) the Zimbabwe Republic Police Organisation Development, (c) the UK/Zimbabwe Air Traffic Control Radar, (d) Land Rovers ATP and (e) LANPOL Police ATP in each year between 1997 and 2001. [42472]

The following table shows how much money the UK Government gave under their aid programme in Zimbabwe to the following programmes between 1997 and 2001.

The Republic Police Grant and the Zimbabwe Republic Police Organisation Development programme are one and the same.

Expenditure by UK financial year £000

Programme title

1996–07

1997–08

1998–09

1999–2000

2000–01

2001–02

Zimbabwe Republic Police Organisation Development

8

90

741

741

96

Air Traffic Control Radar Phase 2 Monitoring Consultancy—Civil Aviation Authority

83

115

88

39

19

Aid-and-Trade Provision Supply of 300 Land Rovers

224

62

Land Rovers for Zimbabwe Republic Police Aid-and- Trade Provision Project

5,354

1,355

24

-49(8)

(8) Indicates that amount was returned to DFID.

DFID suspended development assistance to Zimbabwe in 2002, in protest at continuing disregard for democratic principles and mismanagement of the economy by the Government of Zimbabwe. Since that time, DFID has only supported the international response to the humanitarian and HIV/AIDS crisis in Zimbabwe, through funding to United Nations agencies and non-governmental organisations.

Departmental Staff

To ask the Leader of the House how many disciplinary actions against civil servants employed in his Office (a) were commenced and (b) resulted in a sanction being applied in each of the last five years. [43504]

No disciplinary action has been taken against civil servants in the Office of the Leader of the House of Commons Office within the last five years.

Departmental Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport

(1) how much was spent on external consultants and advisers by (a) her Department, (b) each (i) non-departmental public body and (ii) Executive agency for which her Department is responsible and (c) each independent statutory body, organisation and body financially sponsored by her Department in each year since May 1997; [39102]

(2) if she will list the public relations companies that have had contracts with (a) her Department, (b) each (i) non-departmental public body and (ii) Executive agency for which her Department is responsible and (c) independent statutory bodies, organisations and bodies financially sponsored by her Department and other such organisations since May 1997. [39103]

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has over 60 sponsored bodies/Executive agencies and the figures for them could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what has been the annual expenditure on vehicles for (a) her Department and (b) each (i) non-departmental public body, (ii) Executive agency and (iii) other public body for which she is responsible in (A) Scotland, (B) Wales, (C) each of the English regions and (D) Northern Ireland in each of the last three financial years; and what the planned expenditure is for 2005–06. [39994]

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) lease five cars from the Government Car and Despatch Agency (GCDA). Four for our Ministers and one for our permanent secretary.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has over 60 sponsored bodies/Executive agencies and the figures for them could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

For details of expenditure on ministerial vehicles provided to the Department by the Government Car and Despatch Agency I refer the hon. Member to the letter of 20 December 2005 from the chief executive of the Government Car and Despatch Agency to the hon. Member for Lewes (Norman Baker). Copies of this letter are available in the Library of the House.

Departmental Targets

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport

(1) whether (a) opera, (b) (i) classical, (ii) jazz, (iii) blues and (iv) choral music and (c) folk singing is recorded as participation in an arts activity for the purposes of her Department's Public Service Agreement performance target 3; and if she will make a statement; [44022]

(2) whether attending a (a) book or poetry reading, (b) street performance, (c) musical, (d) film, (e) cultural festival and (f) carnival is recorded as an attendance for the purposes of her Department's Public Service Agreement performance target 3; and if she will make a statement; [44026]

(3) whether attending a (a) world, (b) dance, (c) rock, (d) alternative, (e) blues, (f) electronica, (g) hip-hop, (h) rap, (i) rhythm and blues, (j) soul, (k) bangra, (l) jungle, (m) punk, (n) folk and (o) choral music event is recorded as an attendance for the purposes of her Department's Public Service Agreement performance target 3; and if she will make a statement; [44027]

(4) whether designing (a) clothes and (b) websites is recorded as participation in an arts activity for the purposes of her Department's Public Service Agreement performance target 3; and if she will make a statement; [44035]

(5) whether (a) directing, (b) stage designing and (c) costume designing for (i) plays, (ii) television programmes and (iii) films is recorded as participation in an arts activity for the purposes of her Department's Public Service Agreement performance target 3; and if she will make a statement. [44036]

The information requested can be found in the 2005–08 Public Service Agreements (PSA) Technical Note, which is on my Department's website at: http://www.culture.gov.uk/global/publications/archive_2005/psa_tech_note.htm

This Technical Note sets out how the Department for Culture, Media and Sport will measure progress towards its PSA targets.

Licensing Act 2003

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what assessment she has made of the effects of the Licensing Act 2003 on levels of crime and disorder in (a) Gravesham and (b) England and Wales. [43280]

It is too early to draw any firm conclusions about the impact of the Licensing Act 2003 on the level of crime and disorder. However, there are anecdotal signs of some positive impact from the new flexibility in closing times to reduce flash points at 11 pm, and we have received no evidence that licensing law changes have had an adverse impact on accident and emergency facilities.

The Government will continue to monitor the impact of the new legislation closely, including a programme of evaluation being conducted by the Home Office into the impact of the licensing reforms on crime and disorder.

Olympic Games

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what level of funding has been made available to support youth sport up to the 2012 London Olympics. [44296]

holding answer 20 January 2006

In the five years leading up to 2008, DCMS, DfES and lottery investment in PE and school sport will total over £1.5 billion. This is being invested in schemes benefiting children and young people through PE, School Sport, Club Links and Coaching.

In addition, Sport England is funding a number of programmes up to 20091 , which will help support and deliver youth sport.

Examples of these programmes include £100 million Exchequer funding up to 2008 in England for the Community Club Development Programme, to assist National Governing Bodies in developing community sports clubs which increase participation and widen access to sport for groups including young people.

A further example is the £17 million Exchequer funding allocated to the Talented Athlete Scholarship Scheme up to 2008 and the £2 million Lottery funding allocated to 2012 scholarships, to support our young medal hopefuls2 .

1 DCMS has a three year commitment until 2008 to provide Sport England and UK Sport with Exchequer funding. Lottery distribution shares within the Sport good cause are fixed until 2009 to allow Sport England and UK Sport to distribute Lottery funding. As such, details of funding commitments beyond 2009 are currently not available.

1 April 2006, the Talented Athlete Scholarship Scheme and 2012 scholarships will be funded by UK Sport.2 From

Poetry

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what steps the Arts Council is planning to take to promote poetry in the 2005 to 2008 period; what funding has been allocated for this purpose in the budget for that period; and if she will make a statement. [44435]

Poetry is promoted throughout the 2005 to 2008 period through the 24 Arts Council England (ACE) poetry Regularly Funded Organisations (RFOs). ACE is funding organisations and activity that encourage both writing and reading across all age groups and right across society.

The following table shows the amount ACE has given to literature RFOs, and within this amount those which focus on poetry. Many literature organisations which may not be poetry specific, do also have a poetry remit.

£

Funding

Art form

2005–06

2006–07

2007–08

Literature

5,419,289

5,529,656

5,782,567

Poetry

1,759,165

1,617,152

1,612,683

Business Review

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many companies will be required to produce the proposed enhanced Business Review; how many would have been required to produce an Operating and Financial Review; whether all companies operating in the United Kingdom will have to produce such business reviews; and what enhancements to the proposed Business Review will be made. [42145]

Under provisions introduced into the Companies Act 1985 by the Companies Act 1985 (Operating and Financial Review and Directors' Report etc.) Regulations of March 2005, all GB quoted companies would have been required to produce an Operating and Financial Review. The associated Regulatory Impact Assessment put the number of quoted companies at 1,290.

Only GB registered companies will be required to produce a Directors' Report including a Business Review, under section 234ZZB of the Companies Act 1985, for financial years beginning on or after 1 April 2005. The Regulatory Impact Assessment accompanying the regulations which introduced the requirement indicated that 37,290 GB companies will have to publish a Directors' Report including a Business Review. This does not include companies which meet the statutory definition of a small company which will not have to include a Business Review.

As I indicated in my statement to the House before Christmas, the Government are currently inviting views on whether any particular requirements of the Business Review need to be further clarified; and on any other considerations which Ministers should take into account in deciding how to frame suitable amendments for the Company Law Reform Bill on these matters. The consultation closes on 15 February and therefore no decisions have been taken.

Cape Town Treaty

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what plans the UK Government have to ratify the Cape Town treaty. [42028]

The UK played an active role in negotiations on the Cape Town Convention and Aircraft Protocol at the 2001 Diplomatic Conference and is committed to its ratification though there are no immediate plans to do so.

It should be noted that the convention is one of a number of so-called "mixed competence" Treaties where conclusion at EU level has been blocked due to disagreement between the UK and Spain over Gibraltar. Spain does not formally recognise Gibraltar competent authorities, because it does not recognise Gibraltar's 1969 constitution. In April 2000, a set of "Postboxing Arrangements" was concluded, to facilitate communications between Gibraltar authorities and their counterparts elsewhere in the European Union by indirect contact through the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in London. These arrangements were circulated to all member states and the institutions of the EU on 19 April 2000. They laid down how "postboxing" would operate in relation both to EU instruments and to certain named international conventions. They would only apply to other treaties if both sides agreed. For its part, the UK has also made clear that it would need to obtain the consent of the Government of Gibraltar.

EU Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the impact of the delay in the implementation of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive on business. [42296]

The delay in the implementation of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive in the UK has been welcomed by business. It will give the Government time to ensure that the costs to business are minimised once the directive has been fully implemented.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many man-hours have been spent on each (a) review of and (b) consultation on implementation of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive; and how much each such (i) review and (ii) consultation has cost. [42300]

Gas Prices

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement on the effect of UK gas prices on industry. [43900]

The Government take the recent increases in gas prices very seriously, and particularly their impact on the competitiveness of UK industry. We understand that this creates tough trading conditions, especially for energy intensive users, and we are aware of a few companies having reduced production in response to the very high prices since November. This will, of course, have a negative impact on UK industrial output, but in terms of overall GDP this will be relatively minor.

I have visited a number of major industrial gas users and am continuing to meet with companies, business representatives and gas suppliers to discuss gas prices and security of supply. We are also undertaking some research into the capability of UK industry to reduce their gas demand.

The impact on UK businesses of increases in gas prices will depend on a variety of factors, including how much gas a particular company uses, the degree of their exposure to spot and forward prices and the duration of high prices. It will also be affected by the energy prices paid by their competitors. A further sector-specific issue is whether they are in a competitive market where international trade sets the price or in a sector where prices are determined more locally and rising energy costs could be passed on.

Provisional data for October 2005 shows that UK retail gas prices for small, medium and large industrial users were below the EU15 median. However, individual companies will have agreed commercially confidential contract terms and prices that might differ from these averages. I am also aware, from my industry visits and meetings, that, there is some evidence that gas prices in the UK for some of our very large industrial users are above those on the Continent, and I recognise the risk that this presents to UK competitiveness. Officials are working closely with Industry and Ofgem, with a view to help, wherever possible, to mitigate the situation and reduce these impacts.

Patents Act

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement on the operation of sections 1 to 4 of the Patents Act 2004. [41002]

Sections 1 to 4 of the Patents Act 2004 will bring UK patents legislation into line with the revised European Patent Convention ("EPC"). These provisions will be brought into force at the same time as the revised EPC itself takes effect. This is desirable in order to maintain consistency between the UK and European patents systems. It is uncertain exactly when this will be, because the revised EPC takes effect two years after the 15th state has ratified or acceded, or (if earlier) three months after the final state has ratified or acceded. At present I understand that 14 states have done so, and that includes the UK. The revised EPC, and the corresponding provisions in the 2004 Act, are therefore unlikely to take effect before mid-2008.

Pension Contributions

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what the cost was of pension contributions incurred by (a) his Department and (b) each (i) non-departmental public body, (ii) executive agency and (iii) other public body for which he is responsible in (A) Scotland, (B) Wales, (C) each of the English regions and (D) Northern Ireland in each of the last three financial years; and what the planned expenditure is for 2005–06. [39993]

The pension contributions recorded in the Department of Trade and Industry's Consolidated Resource Accounts (which include the executive agencies, The Insolvency Service, Employment Tribunals Service, National Weights And Measures Laboratory and the NDPB The Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service) are as follows:

£000

2002–03

30,053

2003–04

32,076

2004–05

34,876

The pension costs of the non-consolidated bodies for which the Department is responsible are accounted for in each of the individual body's published accounts. To table each of these bodies to obtain this information would result in the incurring of disproportionate costs.

For 2005–06, employers' contributions are payable to the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (PCSPS) at one of four rates in the ranges 16.2 per cent. to 24.6 per cent. of pensionable pay, based on salary bands. The Scheme Actuary reviews employer contributions every four years following a full scheme valuation; last carried out as at 31 March 2003. The contribution rates reflect the cost of benefits as they accrue (net of employee contributions), not the costs as they are actually incurred, and reflect past experience of the scheme.

Wind Farms

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what the cost to public funds of grants to companies for the construction of wind farms has been for each of the last five years, broken down by company. [43360]

The cost to public funds of grants to companies for the construction of offshore wind farms in the last five financial years is as follows:

£ million

Financial year

Project

Developer

Cost

2004–05

North Hoyle

National Wind Power

7.5

2004–05

Scroby Sands

EON UK

7.5

2005–06

Kentish Flats

Kentish Flats Ltd.

8.7

2005–06

Barrow Offshore

Centrica and Dong A/S

6.5

2005–06

North Hoyle

National Wind Power

2.3

2005–06

Scroby Sands

EON UK

2.2

Total

34.7

No capital grants have been paid to companies for the construction of onshore wind farms in the last five financial years.

Asylum/Immigration

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many asylum applicants were returned to other EU countries under the terms of the Dublin Regulations in each month since June 2005. [40356]

The approximate number of asylum applicants returned to other EU countries under the terms of the Dublin Regulations in each month since June 2005 is as follows:

Number

June 2005

130

July 2005

140

August 2005

150

September 2005

140

These figures are based on internal management information and as such are not of sufficient quality to be published as National Statistics.

Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he will reply to the letter dated 28 November 2005 regarding police re-organisation from Mr. Terrence S. Hyde, a constituent of the hon. Member for Shrewsbury and Atcham. [43060]

A reply was sent to Mr. Terence Hyde, on 16 January 2006, and a copy has been sent to the hon. Member.

Crime Statistics

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many notifiable offences were committed in England in each year since 1976–77, broken down by (a) burglary, (b) car crime, (c) robbery, (d) violent crime and (e) other offences; what the percentage change was in each year; and if he will make a statement. [41306]

The available information is given in the following tables.

Table 1: Offences recorded by the police in England Number and percentage

All burglary Vehicle crime Robbery

Number

Percentage change

Number

Percentage change

Number

Percentage change

1976

486,771

n/a

480,394

n/a

11,267

n/a

1977(10)

571,101

n/a

575,770

n/a

13,395

n/a

1978

536,683

-6

581,395

1

12,867

-4

1979

521,272

-3

559,669

-4

12,218

-5

1980

590,153

13

590,343

5

14,699

20

1981

686,899

16

680,227

15

19,920

36

1982

771,713

12

763,850

12

22,497

13

1983

772,981

0

715,113

-6

21,813

-3

1984

854,736

11

762,280

7

24,610

13

1985

828,808

-3

807,248

6

27,179

10

1986

886,347

7

941,747

17

29,630

9

1987

855,910

-3

997,343

6

32,262

9

1988

776,413

-9

930,414

-7

31,055

-4

1989

786,917

1

969,065

4

32,777

6

1990

961,696

22

1,200,462

24

35,731

9

1991

1,160,470

21

1,416,489

18

44,738

25

1992

1,290,664

11

1,468,715

4

52,224

17

1993

1,307,683

1

1,445,873

-2

57,098

9

1994

1,203,637

-8

1,303,055

-10

59,377

4

1995

1,183,159

-2

1,253,756

-4

67,284

13

1996

1,112,752

-6

1,227,368

-2

73,172

9

1997

968,630

-13

1,057,787

-14

62,261

-15

Number and percentage

Violent crime(9) All other offences Total

Number

Percentage change

Number

Percentage change

Number

Percentage change

1976

105,583

n/a

954,119

n/a

2,026,867

n/a

1977(10)

110,915

n/a

1,242,780

n/a

2,500,566

n/a

1978

116,242

5

1,196,503

-4

2,430,823

-3

1979

122,602

5

1,205,727

1

2,409,270

-1

1980

126,956

4

1,248,511

4

2,555,963

6

1981

133,415

5

1,320,928

6

2,821,469

10

1982

143,830

8

1,425,591

8

3,104,984

10

1983

146,677

2

1,451,377

2

3,086,148

-1

1984

151,899

4

1,558,657

7

3,327,572

8

1985

162,791

7

1,636,758

5

3,435,605

3

1986

169,696

4

1,659,879

1

3,657,669

6

1987

189,053

11

1,655,090

0

3,697,396

1

1988

205,398

9

1,607,085

-3

3,519,310

-5

1989

227,638

11

1,691,243

5

3,674,863

4

1990

236,985

4

1,915,220

13

4,314,363

17

1991

251,720

6

2,176,456

14

5,005,135

16

1992

268,821

7

2,276,259

5

5,304,459

6

1993

278,380

4

2,215,301

-3

5,247,237

-1

1994

296,208

6

2,194,007

-1

4,996,907

-5

1995

295,428

0

2,120,551

-3

4,852,894

-3

1996

326,387

10

2,123,800

0

4,790,307

-1

1997

326,993

0

2,007,981

-5

4,361,391

-9

n/a=not applicable.

(9) Includes violence against the person, sexual offences and robbery.

(10) In 1977, offences of criminal damage of value £20 and under were introduced into the series.

Table 2: Offences recorded by the police in England Number and percentage(11)

All burglary Vehicle crime Robbery

Number

Percentage change

Number

Percentage change

Number

Percentage change

1998–99

911,243

n/a

1,021,565

n/a

65,982

n/a

1999–2000

869,704

-5

992,054

-3

83,368

26

2000–01

803,144

-8

924,795

-7

94,264

13

2001–02

846,301

n/a

1,025,945

n/a

120,329

n/a

Number and percentage

Violent crime(12) All other offences Total

Number

Percentage change

Number

Percentage change

Number

Percentage change

1998–99

571,027

n/a

2,343,260

n/a

4,847,095

n/a

1999–2000

662,525

16

2,521,415

8

5,045,698

4

2000–01

692,552

5

2,511,903

0

4,932,394

-2

2001–02

773,897

n/a

2,637,449

n/a

5,283,592

n/a

n/a=not applicable.

(11) Using the expanded coverage and revised counting rules which came into effect on 1 April 1988. Figures in this table are not directly comparable with those for earlier years.

(12) Includes violence against the person, sexual offences and robbery.

Table 3: Offences recorded by the police in England Number and percentage(13)

All burglary Vehicle crime Robbery

Number

Percentage change

Number

Percentage change

Number

Percentage change

2002–03

851,988

1

926,971

-10

106,652

-11

2003–04

783,970

-8

843,228

-9

99,914

-6

2004–05

650,682

-17

699,474

-17

87,625

-12

Number and percentage

Violent crime(14) All other offences Total

Number

Percentage change

Number

Percentage change

Number

Percentage change

2002–03

935,019

21

2,888,938

10

5,602,916

6

2003–04

1,052,601

13

2,965,518

3

5,645,317

1

2004–05

1,127,681

7

2,817,212

-5

5,295,049

-6

(13) The National Crime Recording Standard was introduced nationally in April 2002. Because of this, figures in this table are not directly comparable with those for earlier years.

(14) Includes violence against the person, sexual offences and robbery.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many recorded offences of (a) burglary, (b) thefts and (c) thefts from cars there have been in each division of the Staffordshire police force in each year since 1997. [43474]

The available information relates to offences recorded in basic command units (BCUs) in the Staffordshire police force area and is given in the tables. Data at BCD level has only been collected since 1999.

Table 1: Recorded offences in Staffordshire 1999–2000 to 2001–02 Number of offences

Basic Command Unit

Offence

1999–2000

2000–01

2001–02

Chase

Domestic burglary

1,624

1,615

1,912

Thefts

(15)

10,094

9,750

of which:

Thefts from cars

2,536

3,134

2,968

North Staffordshire

Domestic burglary

1,600

1,235

1,417

Thefts

(15)

6,347

7,791

of which:

Thefts from cars

2,625

2,086

2,861

Stoke on Trent

Domestic burglary

4,336

3,176

3,093

Thefts

(15)

12,435

14,095

of which:

Thefts from cars

4,275

3,367

3,857

Trent Valley

Domestic burglary

1,513

1,523

1,661

Thefts

(15)

9,085

10,132

of which:

Thefts from cars

2,162

2,000

2,632

(15) Not available

Note:

The data in this table is prior to the introduction of the National Crime Recording Standard. The data is therefore not directly comparable with that for subsequent years.

Table 2: Recorded offences in Staffordshire 2002–03 to 2004–05 Number of offences

Basic Command Unit

Offence

2002–03

2003–04

2004–05

Chase

Domestic burglary

1,446

1,342

1,003

Thefts

9,098

8,955

8,001

of which:

Thefts from cars

2,302

2,505

2,030

North Staffordshire

Domestic burglary

1,178

922

753

Thefts

6,989

6212

5,329

of which:

Thefts from cars

2,198

1,832

1,489

Stoke on Trent

Domestic burglary

2,438

2,491

1,732

Thefts

12,711

12,100

10,448

of which:

Thefts from cars

3,237

3,106

2,501

Trent Valley

Domestic burglary

1,396

1,410

1,225

Thefts

9,606

9,226

8,439

of which:

Thefts from cars

2,357

2,133

1,780

Note:

The data in this table takes account of the introduction of the National Crime Recording Standard in April 2002. The data is therefore not directly comparable with that for earlier years.

Criminal Records Bureau

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what details of an offence are recorded in information included in disclosures by the Criminal Records Bureau. [42572]

All Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) disclosures provide employers with information concerning individuals' offences as recorded on the police national computer (PNC), including convictions, cautions, reprimands and warnings. This would include the date of the conviction, the description of the offence, the disposal and the court or police force concerned. In the case of cautions, the date of the caution and the place it was issued are also included.

Where an application indicates that the position involves working with children and/or vulnerable adults, the disclosure, whether it is at the standard or enhanced level, will detail the nature of an individual's inclusion on the Protection of Children Act list or list 99, where the position involves working with children, or details of inclusion on the protection of vulnerable adults list where the position involves working with vulnerable adults. Where the individual is not included on either or all of those lists, the disclosure will record that fact.

An enhanced CRB check involves a further level of checking against non-conviction information which may be held locally by individual police forces. Additionally, any relevant adult or child protection list should be checked where relevant to the position applied for and if a match is found that fact is included on the disclosure.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will make changes to the Criminal Records Bureau's portability scheme with a view to reducing the financial burden placed on voluntary bodies. [42788]

The Criminal Records Bureau's Portability Service operates at no cost to the registered body network, which includes organisations belonging to the voluntary sector. Changes to the Portability Service are under consideration but not with the specific aim to reduce the financial burden on voluntary bodies. The Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) remains committed to its stated support of voluntary bodies by processing free of charge disclosure checks for those who fall within the definition of a volunteer.

The primary aim of the changes is to minimise the inherent risks involved in reusing disclosures. The decision to accept 'ported' disclosures lies entirely with the employer or regulating body concerned, as does the accompanying risk of making use of potentially out of date information when assessing suitability.

Departmental Objectives

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on progress towards his Department's strategic objective IV. [41060]

The Government's strategy for a comprehensive reform of the asylum and immigration process "Controlling our Borders: Making Migration Work for Britain" was published in February 2004. The subsequent consultation period on the new points-based system for managed migration described in "Selective Admission: Making migration work for Britain" ended on 7 November 2005.

We anticipate publishing our response in the spring with a timetable for next steps. The e-borders programme will deliver a fully integrated border control system and is planned to roll out in three stages from 2004 to 2014. We have introduced a range of legislative and operational measures which have successfully reduced the number of unfounded asylum applications and processing times.

The Department remains committed to achieving its aim of tipping the balance and the number of failed asylum seekers being removed from the UK has risen significantly. We removed three, 935 asylum seekers in Q3 2005, 10 per cent. more than in Q3 2004. The 'New Asylum Model' will introduce faster, tightly-managed processes for all new asylum claimants.

We have negotiated returns arrangements to assist in returning immigration offenders and are putting immigration at the centre of our relationship with all major countries from which illegal migrants and failed asylum seekers come. We continue to engage closely with other EU member states on returns and have taken part in a number of successful joint operations in this area. The Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill which is currently before Parliament will provide the necessary legislative basis for those parts of the strategy which require primary legislation.

DNA Profiles

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer of 20 December 2005, Official Report, column 2890W, on DNA profiles, how many (a) murderers and (b) rapists who had been arrested but had not initially been charged or cautioned for an offence have been caught as a consequence of having their profiles stored on the national DNA database; and if he will make a statement. [44407]

Research carried out in January 2006 indicates that: 37 murders/manslaughters, 16 attempted murders and 90 rapes have so far been linked to people who had DNA samples taken on arrest but who were not subsequently proceeded against for the arresting offence. It is not possible at the current time to determine the outcome of the police investigation of these crimes.

Highly Skilled Migrant Programme

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people have been accepted under the Highly Skilled Migrant Programme in each year since its introduction; and, how many of those were unemployed on the latest date for which figures are available. [38715]

The following table provides detail of the numbers of approvals issued under the Highly Skilled Migrant Programme (HSMP) for each calendar year since the programme was launched. These approvals allow individuals to apply either for leave to enter or leave to remain in the United Kingdom as Highly Skilled Migrants. (These data have not provided under National Statistics protocols. They have been derived from local management information and are therefore provisional and subject to change.)

The increase in the number of applications approved followed a review of the programme in October 2003. This review resulted in the introduction of a number of changes to the HSMP criteria to ensure that the programme attracted a greater share of highly skilled individuals to the United Kingdom. Information is not collected to determine if a Highly Skilled Migrant is unemployed. Successful applicants have to demonstrate though that they are able to maintain themselves and any dependants without recourse to public funds.

Initial grants of leave issued to Highly Skilled Migrants are limited to a period of 12 months. Only where a Highly Skilled Migrant has been able to establish that they have taken all reasonable steps to become lawfully economically active in the UK during this initial period, will an extension to their stay, for a further period of 36 months, be granted.

2002

2003

2004

2005

Total

1,180

3,695

7,515

17,642

30,032

Illegal Broadcasting

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many convictions there were in each of the last five years in relation to (a) pirate radio stations and (b) illegal broadcasts. [38023]

holding answer 15 December 2005

I have been asked to reply.

I am informed by Ofcom that convictions concerning pirate radio stations and illegal broadcasts in the last five years were as follows.

Number

2000

41

2001

20

2002

49(16)

2003

103(17)

2004

60(18)

2005

16

(16) Also two formal cautions April to December 2002.

(17) Also five formal cautions.

(18) Also six formal cautions.

(19) Also eight formal cautions and 34 outstanding prosecutions.

Note:

The figures for formal cautions are drawn from an information system which came into service on 1 April 2002.

There is no legal distinction between illegal broadcasters (pirate radio stations) and illegal broadcasts. The figures given therefore cover the two categories.

IRIS Project

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer of 30 November 2005, Official Report, column 597W, on the IRIS project, when he expects to publish the key findings of the project IRIS operational pilot. [42708]

The evaluation of the Project IRIS operational pilot will be commercially sensitive but I will report the key findings to the House.

Knives

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people have been (a) fined and (b) imprisoned for (i) illegally selling knives to under 16-year-olds and (ii) marketing a bladed product in a manner which (A) indicates that it is suitable for combat and (B) is likely to promote simulations of violent behaviour since the Knives Act 1997 in (1) Greater London and (2) each London borough. [43577]

The information for London is shown in the table. Statistics are not available for each London borough.

Offenders sentenced to fines and imprisonment for offences under the Knives Act 1997, London

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Unlawful marketing of knives (selling or hiring)(20)

Sentenced

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Fine

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Immediate custody

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Unlawful marketing of knives (offering or exposing to sell or hire)(20)

Sentenced

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Fine

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Immediate custody

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Unlawful marketing of knives—having in possession for the purpose of sale or hire(20)

Sentenced

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Fine

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Immediate custody

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Publication of any written pictorial or other material in connection with the marketing of any knife—the material suggesting/indicating knife suitable for combat September 1997(20)

Sentenced

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Fine

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Immediate custody

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Publication of any written pictorial or other material in connection with the marketing of any knife—the material is otherwise likely to simulate or encourage violet behaviour involving use of the knife as a weapon(20)

Sentenced

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Fine

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Immediate custody

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Selling a knife etc. to a person under 16 years(21)

Sentenced

0

2

1

0

1

3

3

1

Fine

0

2

1

0

1

3

3

1

Immediate custody

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

(20) These sections of the Act came into force in September 1997.

(21) This offence is not included in the Knives Act 1997. It is covered by the Offensive Weapons Act 1996 S.6(1).

Source:

RDS-NOMS 18 January 2006.

London Bombings

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what use the police made of public mobile communications networks during the response operation to the incidents on the London Underground and bus network on 7 July 2005. [43780]

I refer the hon. member to the answer I gave on 17 January 2006, Official Report, column 1273W.

Miniature Motorbikes

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what representations he has received from the police about the illegal use of miniature motorbikes and quad bikes; what plans his Department has to tackle this misuse; if he will establish a compulsory registration scheme for such bikes; and if he will take steps to prohibit ownership for a set period of time by individuals who have been caught using them illegally. [41834]

We are aware of public concern about the misuse of these vehicles and the issue has been raised with us by the police and by other antisocial behaviour practitioners.

The police already have a power under the Police Reform Act to seize any mechanically propelled vehicle which is being driven either in a careless and inconsiderate manner on-road or off-road without lawful authority contrary to s3 or s34 of the Road Traffic Act 1988,, and is causing or likely to cause alarm, distress or annoyance to members of the public. The driver can also be prosecuted for the Road Traffic Act offence and penalised accordingly.

The Home Office issued on 1 November additional guidance to the police on this legislation, explaining the rationale behind its various aspects, clarifying its terms and the circumstances in which it might be used and offering examples of effective operations. At the same time Regulations governing use of the power were simplified. The Government are now considering what more can be done to curb the problem; including whether there is a need for further legislation, and mandatory registration. We have no current plans to prohibit ownership.

National Criminal Intelligence Service

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will require the National Criminal Intelligence Service to allow inward communication from the public via e-mail and the internet; and if he will make a statement. [44240]

The National Criminal Intelligence Service was not set up to receive reports direct from members of the public, but provides links which the public can use to make contact electronically with the appropriate authority.

NSPCC

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer of 29 November 2005, Official Report, column 452W, on the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, what the basis is for his confidence in social workers' awareness of the risks of prejudicing future police investigations; and if he will make a statement. [42511]

It is the responsibility of the Senior Investigating Officer to set the parameters of the police investigation and to ensure that third parties involved in the case are aware of the risks of prejudicing the investigation.

'Working together to safeguard children: a guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children' was jointly published by the Home Office, Department for Health and Department for Skills and Education in 1999. Chapter five includes guidance on investigative interviews with children where social workers have a role and states at paragraph 5.36 that "leading or suggestive communications should always be avoided". In addition, paragraphs 6.24 to 6.26 sets out guidance in relation to investigating organised and multiple abuse and states the need for the police and other agencies involved to agree clear written protocols in relation to all key operational and policy matters.

Police

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department

(1) what level of fitness is required for police officers; [42461]

(2) if he will instigate an assessment of (a) the fitness of police officers and (b) possible measures to improve fitness. [42458]

All applicants recruited to the post of constable must be in good health and able both physically and mentally to perform the duties of a police officer.

As part of the standard recruitment process, applicants are required to pass a national job related physical fitness test to ensure that they are capable of meeting the physical demands of police work and to ensure that they are not put at risk from undertaking police tasks. The test must be passed prior to entry and again during the probationary period.

We are also considering the introduction of regular testing of all officers in-service to ensure maintenance of the minimum fitness standard.

Details of the recruit fitness test are contained on the Police Could You website at www.policecouldyou.co.uk and are set out for forces in Home Office Circular 43/2004. We are placing a copy of the Circular in the Library of the House.

Officers in certain specialist roles are also required to demonstrate a higher level of fitness on a regular basis. Work is being undertaken to ensure consistency in standards across the Service.

Officers are encouraged to develop and maintain health and fitness as part of the Home Office's strategy for a healthy police service and individual force occupational force strategies.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer of 20 June 2005, Official Report, column 771W, on police, how many fatal accidents involving police service vehicles there were in 2004–05; and if he will make a statement. [40900]

Figures are provided in the table. Data collected on behalf of HM Inspectorate of Constabulary appears in column A and provides the number of fatalities resulting from road traffic collisions on public roads involving police vehicles and those resulting from immediate/emergency response and police pursuits.

The figures in this column are comparable with the figures provided in the previous PQ answer. The Independent Police Complaints Commission published the bulletin on "Deaths during or following police contact: Statistics for England and Wales 2004–05" on 19 November 2005. This includes a wider definition of road traffic fatalities which, for the purpose of the reporting, are defined as deaths of motorists, cyclists or pedestrians resulting from police pursuits, police vehicles responding to emergency calls and other police traffic-related activity. This data is provided in column B.

Fatal accidents involving police service vehicles—2004–05

Column A Column B

Fatalities resulting from road traffic collisions on public roads involving police vehicles and those resulting from immediate/emergency response and police pursuits as at 31 March 2005

Road traffic fatalities including the deaths of motorists, cyclists or pedestrians resulting from police pursuits, police vehicles responding to emergency calls and other police traffic related activity (2004–05)(22)

Avon and Somerset

0

0

Bedfordshire

1

2

Cambridgeshire

0

1

Cheshire

0

0

Cleveland

0

2

Cumbria

0

0

Derbyshire

1

1

Devon and Cornwall

0

0

Dorset

(23)

0

Durham

0

0

Dyfed-Powys

0

0

Essex

1

2

Gloucestershire

0

0

Greater Manchester

4

4

Gwent

0

1

Hampshire

0

1

Hertfordshire

0

0

Humberside

0

1

Kent

0

0

Lancashire

1

3

Leicestershire

0

1

Lincolnshire

2

2

London, City of

0

0

Merseyside

0

1

Metropolitan police

4

5

Norfolk

0

0

Northamptonshire

0

1

Northumbria

2

2

North Wales

0

1

North Yorkshire

0

0

Nottinghamshire

1

2

South Wales

0

0

South Yorkshire

2

2

Staffordshire

0

0

Suffolk

0

0

Surrey

0

0

Sussex

2

2

Thames Valley

0

1

Warwickshire

2

2

West Mercia

0

1

West Midlands

0

1

West Yorkshire

0

2

Wiltshire

0

0

Total

23

44

(22) Taken from the "Deaths during or following police contact: Statistics for England and Wales 2004–05" publication published on 19 November 2005.

(23) Force is unable to provide figures in 2004–05.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the roll-out of the Safer Neighbourhood policing teams is planned in each ward of the London borough of Haringey; and if he will make a statement. [42639]

There are currently 285 Safer Neighbourhoods teams in London; a minimum of eight per borough.

On 10 January the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service Sir Ian Blair and Mayor of London Ken Livingstone announced that the roll out of Safer Neighbourhoods is being accelerated to ensure that every neighbourhood in London will have a full team in place during the next financial year (2006–07).

This will mean that the remaining 340 wards will initially have teams of four staff in place by April 2006, rising to six staff by April 2007. This will increase the number of teams from the current 285 to a total of 625 a year ahead of schedule.

Recorded Offences (Humberside)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people have been found to be carrying knives in public without good reason or lawful authority in each division of Humberside police in each year since the introduction of the Knives Act 1997. [42586]

Data from the court proceedings database held by the Office for Criminal Justice Reform shows that the number of people proceeded against at the magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts for carrying knives in public without good reason or lawful authority for Humberside police force area, 2002–04 is contained in the table.

It is not possible to identify those convictions by each division of Humberside police as the data is not collected at this level of detail.

Number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts under Criminal Justice Act 1988, Sec 139(1), Humberside police force area, 1997 to 2004

Offence description

Statute

Year

Proceeded against

Found guilty

Having an article with blade or point in public place

Criminal Justice Act 1988, Sec 139 as amended by Offensive Weapons Act 1996, Sec 3

1997

60

43

1998

63

45

1999

80

65

2000

63

53

2001

61

46

2002

81

69

2003

77

63

2004

120

105

Having an article with blade or point on school premises(25)

Criminal Justice Act 1988, Sec 139A(1)(5)(a) added by Offensive Weapons Act 1996, Sec 4(1)

1997

1998

1

1999

2000

2

2

2001

2002

2003

2

2

2004

1

1

(24) These data are on the principal offence basis.

Stateless People

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many stateless people were known to be resident in the United Kingdom in each of the last five years; and what his policy is on considering applications for leave to remain. [43049]

No distinction is made between applications for leave to remain from stateless people and from people who have a nationality. Stateless people whose applications are successful are granted leave to enter or remain in the usual way. Those whose applications fail are expected to leave the United Kingdom, usually to return to their countries of habitual residence. Statistics on grants of settlement—that is, grants of permanent residence—to stateless persons, 2000 to 2004, are given in the following table. However, they are not cumulative and they do not take account of persons who subsequently embark or acquire British Citizenship.

Further immigration statistics can be found in the Command Papers "Control of Immigration: Statistics United Kingdom" available from the Library and from the Home Office websitehttp://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration1.html

Grants of settlement, stateless persons , 2000–04(25)(26)

United Kingdom Number of persons

Nationality

Stateless

2000

930

2001

390

2002

215

2003

330

2004(27)

205

(25) Includes persons whose nationality is recorded as unknown.

(26) Data from 2003 also exclude dependants of EEA and Swiss nationals in confirmed relationships

(27) Provisional

Data rounded to the nearest 5.

Violent Crime

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the reasons for changes in the number of recorded violent crime in each of the last four quarters. [41872]

There are three main reasons for the increases in recorded crime in each of the last four quarters for which figures are available (i.e. ending April to June 2005).

There is still some residual effect from the introduction of the National Crime Recording Standard in 2002. Analysis shows that there is some increase in recording as police forces improve compliance with the standard.

Many of the Government's programmes for tackling domestic violence and sexual crime are encouraging the reporting and therefore recording of offences which had hitherto been grossly under-reported. The reclassification of some offences (such as indecent exposure) as violent has also led to increases.

More pro-active policing and increased police effectiveness may cause an increase in recorded crime. Use of CCTV, for example, may lead to recording and detection of assaults which would otherwise have gone unreported and unrecorded.

The British Crime Survey, which is widely-regarded as providing a more reliable trend measure because it is resistant to changes in reporting, police recording and local policing activity, showed a fall of 7 per cent. in violent crime during this period (though this was not statistically significant).

Democratic Republic of Congo

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs on what date Henri Nswana was accredited to the UK from the Democratic Republic of Congo (a) as chargé d'affaires and (b) as ambassador; and when his accreditation ended. [41307]

Mr Henri Nswana began his posting as Minister Counsellor at the Democratic Republic of the Congo embassy in the UK in 1998. He was accredited as chargé d'affaires in early 2000, and became ambassador for the Democratic Republic of Congo on 6 July 2003. His accreditation ended on 20 October 2005.

Departmental Equipment

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many (a) personal computers, (b) laptops, (c) servers, (d) printers, (e) scanners, (f) photocopiers and (g) fax machines (i) his Department and (ii) each (A) non-departmental public body, (B) executive agency and (C) other public body for which his Department is responsible in each English region owned in (1) 2003–04 and (2) 2004–05. [40083]

While core IT equipment is centrally provided, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) also operates a devolved system of budgeting under which directorates have freedom to buy a range of IT and other equipment to support their work. Fax machines, in particular, are paid for from such devolved budgets and no central figures exist for the numbers used within the FCO. Some other equipment is refreshed regularly under existing contracts. The following figures are available, but not necessarily complete, for IT equipment in use in the English regions, at sites in London and in the south east, particularly Hanslope Park, near Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire:

Current

Acquired 2003–04

Acquired 2004–05

(a) Personal computers

4,857

359

580

(b) Laptops

290

53

134

(c) Servers

343

28

88

(d) Printers

491

125

130

(e) Scanners

80

14

20

2003–04

2004–05

(f) Photocopiers (NB photocopiers used by the FCO in the UK are leased and not actually owned by the Department)

335

355

Non-departmental public bodies (NDPB):

British Council

The British Council, which has offices throughout the country, has no central data on photocopiers or fax machines. For the other equipment in question it has outsourced its infrastructure support to Logica CMG which owns all the relevant assets.

Details of equipment held for other NDPBs for which the FCO is responsible, all of which are based in London, are as follows:

The Great Britain-China Centre

2003–04

2004–05

(a) personal computers

6

6

(b) laptops

2

2

(c) servers

1

1

(d) printers

2

2

(e) scanners

1

1

(f) photocopiers

1

1

(g) fax machines

1

1

The British Association for Central and Eastern Europe

2003–04

2004–05

(a) personal computers

3

3

(b) laptops

2

2

(c) servers

1

1

(d) printers

5

5

(e) scanners

1

1

(f) photocopiers

1

1

(g) fax machines

1

1

The Westminster Foundation for Democracy

2003–04

2004–05

(a) personal computers

14

17

(b) laptops

4

4

(c) servers

2

2

(d) printers

9

9

(e) scanners

1

1

(f) photocopiers

2

2

(g) fax machines

1

1

The Marshall Aid Commemoration Commission (MACC)

The Marshall Aid Commemoration Commission owns no IT equipment, and did not do so during 2003–05. The Association of Commonwealth Universities, which provides the secretariat to the MACC, does have some of the IT listed, but buys and maintains this from its own budget.

Equipment used for FCO's advisory NDPB's is included within the totals given elsewhere in this answer.

Executive Agencies

Wilton Park (Near Steyning, West Sussex)

2003–04

2004–05

(a) Personal computers

52

57

(b) Laptops

12

13

(c) Servers

5

6

(d) Printers

28

29

(e) Scanners

4

4

(f) Photocopiers

8

8

(g) Fax machines

5

5

Some of the categories include multi-function machines. Three photocopiers also act as combined scanners. The other photocopiers also act as fax machines.

Departmental Estate (Castle Point)

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what (a) land and (b) property is owned by his Department in Castle Point. [42894]

Ethiopia

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps he has taken to ensure that the Ethiopian President adheres to the final and binding boundary commission border demarcation. [43132]

We supported UN Security Council resolution 1640, which demanded that Ethiopia accept fully and without further delay the final and binding decision of the Eritrea-Ethiopia boundary commission and take immediately concrete steps to enable, without preconditions, the commission to demarcate the border completely and promptly. On 17 December 2005, my noble Friend, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office Minister for Africa, Lord Triesman of Tottenham, met Prime Minister Meles in Addis Ababa and had constructive discussions on the border. As a consequence we are consulting widely with international partners to further the process.

Gibraltar

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when a new Governor of Gibraltar will be appointed; and who will be consulted on the appointment. [44537]

holding answer 20 January 2006

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office, in consultation with the Ministry of Defence will consider candidates to succeed Sir Francis Richards as Governor of Gibraltar.

In keeping with the commitment made by my noble Friend, the then Foreign and Commonwealth Office Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Baroness Amos, at the Overseas Territories Consultative Council in September 2002, the Chief Minister of Gibraltar will be involved in the consultation process.

This recruitment process is already under way, and we hope to make an announcement in the spring.

Indonesia

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will assess the position of the Christian community in Indonesia, with particular reference to those facing (a) prosecution and (b) the death penalty. [44423]

Christians in Indonesia enjoy a high degree of religious freedom. Their right to worship is protected under the Indonesian constitution. There are sporadic incidents of inter-religious violence in certain religiously mixed areas which have adversely affected both the Christian and Muslim populations. However, these have decreased in recent years and the Government of Indonesia is keen to ensure good inter- communal relations, including by working with Muslim and Christian community leaders to reduce tensions.

There are a small number of court cases involving Christians. Where the death penalty has been imposed, as in any other court case, we urge the Indonesian Government to refrain from carrying out executions, and to consider the abolition of the death penalty.

Somalia

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what British participation there has been in the peace process in Somalia; and if he will make a statement. [44455]

We have been closely engaged in the Somali National Reconciliation Conference and the subsequent political process and continue to work closely with the UN and other members of the international community to achieve a comprehensive and lasting settlement and a return to good governance in Somalia. My noble Friend, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office Minister for Africa, Lord Triesman of Tottenham, and my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for International Development, Hilary Benn, and their officials have met the Transitional Federal President, Speaker and Prime Minister of Somalia on many occasions and have urged them to resolve their differences through dialogue.

They have also met with and fully support the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General in encouraging Somali-owned reconciliation initiatives. We are working with other members of the international community to help convene an early meeting of the Transitional Federal Parliament inside Somalia and remain prepared to offer further assistance to reconciliation and rebuilding the Somali state.

Somaliland

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent communications he has had with the Government of Somaliland; and if he will make a statement on future relations. [44454]

My noble Friend, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office Minister for Africa, Lord Triesman of Tottenham, met the Somaliland authorities' Foreign Affairs spokesperson, Edna Adan, on 20 May 2005. During the year he exchanged letters with the Head of the Somaliland authorities, His Excellency Dahir Rayale Kahin, on the London bombings and the Somaliland elections. We acknowledge the progress achieved by Somaliland and hope to help the authorities there to further their democratic and developmental agenda through bilateral and multilateral contributions to aid programmes.

Sudan

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what his Department's most recent assessment is of criminal violence in Sudan; and what recent reports it has received from the United Nations Mission in Sudan on this issue. [18120]

The United Nations Mission in Sudan provides regular reports on the security situation in Sudan. The security situation has improved in the south since the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement. However, criminal violence and banditry are widespread in Darfur. When my noble Friend the Foreign and Commonwealth Office Minister for Africa, Lord Triesman of Tottenham, visited Sudan from 5–8 October he made clear to the Government of Sudan that more must be done to improve security in Darfur. The Government are providing almost £32 million to support the African Union Mission in Darfur, which includes a sizeable civilian policing element.

UN Human Rights Convention

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the members of the UK delegation to the 2006 United Nations Human Rights Convention in Geneva; and what issues the delegation proposes to bring before it. [44573]

The UN World Summit on 14–16 September 2005 agreed to create a new UN Human Rights Council to replace the Commission on Human Rights. Negotiations on the mandate, functions and other elements of the Council are ongoing in New York. Their conclusion and its timing will influence the format of this year's Commission on Human Rights, and the work that it will undertake. For this reason it is not yet possible to list the UK's delegation, although we can confirm that it will be headed by the UK Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva, ambassador Nick Thorne. For the same reasons, no decisions have been taken on what issues we might bring before the Commission. We expect to work closely with EU and other partners in ensuring a smooth transition from the Commission to the Human Rights Council.

Brighton and Hove Albion

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister whether he (a) informed and (b) sought advice from (i) his Permanent Secretary and (ii) other officials before deciding (A) to meet the Chairman of Brighton and Hove Albion and (B) to accept hospitality from the club on 16 December. [44789]

Information relating to internal meetings, discussion and advice is not disclosed as to do so could harm the frankness and candour of internal discussion.

The hospitality provided to my right hon. Friend the Deputy Prime Minister by Brighton and Hove Albion on 16 December consisted of a steak and kidney pie and a glass of water in the crèche temporarily being used as the directors' box. This event was also attended by the directors of both clubs.

Departmental Expenditure

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the cost was of pension contributions incurred by (a) his Department, (b) each (i) non-departmental public body, (ii) Executive agency and (iii) other public body for which he is responsible in (A) Scotland, (B) Wales, (C) each of the English regions and (D) Northern Ireland in each of the last three financial years; and what the planned expenditure is for 2005–06. [39984]

Set out as follows are the contributions incurred by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies (NDPB) for financial years 2002–03 to 2004–05. The planned expenditure for bodies other than ODPM are not held centrally, and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. In addition, the geographical split across the regions can be obtained only at disproportionate cost:

£000

2002–03

2003–04

2004–05

2005–06 (planned)

(a) ODPM

17,025

20,414

22,103

29,855

(b) (ii) Planning Inspectorate

3,080

3,240

3,292

(b) (ii) The Rent Service

1,982

2,146

n/a

n/a

ODPM Consolidated

22,087

25,800

25,395

(b) (i) NDPBs

English Partnerships

1,479

1,551

1,997

Castle Vale Housing Action Trust

238

242

2,621

n/a

Liverpool Housing Action Trust

482

430

3,581

Stonebridge Housing Action Trust

153

164

311

Tower Hamlets Housing Action Trust

29

1,064

n/a

n/a

Housing Corporation

2,340

2,960

3,200

London Thames Gateway Development Corporation

n/a

n/a

6

The Standards Board for England

143

225

327

Thurrock Development Corporation

n/a

3

7

Valuation Tribunals Service

n/a

n/a

567

West Northamptonshire Development Corporation

n/a

n/a

0

(b) (iii) Other bodies

Commission for Local Administration

486

726

634

Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre

190

208

222

The Fire Service College

581

627

716

Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the

National Health Service in England and Wales

(28)

13,024

16,256

Leasehold Advisory Service

(28)

(28)

(28)

n/a—Data not applicable

(28) Not disclosed

For 2005–06, employers' contributions are payable to the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (PCSPS) at one of four rates in the ranges 16.2 to 24.6 per cent. of pensionable pay, based on salary bands. The Scheme Actuary reviews employer contributions every four years following a full scheme valuation; last carried out as at 31 March 2003. The contribution rates reflect the cost of benefits as they accrue (net of employee contributions), not the costs as they are actually incurred, and reflect past experience of the scheme.

Local Authority Allowances

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will list the guidance and regulations the Government have published since May 1997 on allowances for local authority members of (a) national park authorities, (b) passenger transport authorities, (c) fire authorities, (d) police authorities and (e) regional chambers. [42607]

Legislation provides that special responsibility allowance may be payable to members representing their local authority at meetings of another body.

Since 1997 guidance has been issued to accompany legislation on members' allowances in 2001 and 2003.

Since 1997 the following legislation having relevance to attendance, and later special responsibility, allowances have been published:

The Local Authorities (Members' Allowances) (Amendment) Regulations 1998/556 came into force: 1 April 1998

The Local Authorities (Members' Allowances) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 1998/557 came into force: 1 April 1998

The Local Authorities (Members' Allowances) (Amendment) Regulations 1999/1086 came into force: 30 April 1999

The Local Authorities (Members' Allowances) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 1999/1087 came into force: 30 April 1999

The Local Government Act 2000 came into force: 28 July 2001

The Local Authorities (Members' Allowances) (England) Regulations 2001/1280 came into force: 4 May 2001

The Local Authorities (Members' Allowances) (England) Regulations 2003/1021 came into force: 1 May 2003

The Local Authorities (Members' Allowances) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2003/1692 came into force: 31 July 2003

Local Government Finance

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will list the representations the Government has received from hotel companies and the tourism industry in relation to the reform of local government finance in the last two years. [42610]

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has no record of any such representations. The Department for Culture Media and Sport have received copies of representations made by such groups to Sir Michael Lyons' independent Inquiry. Sir Michael published an interim report and consultation paper on 15 December. This report lists contributors to his inquiry and understand that links to the representations received will be posted shortly on the inquiry's website at: www.lyonsinquiry.org

Pay and Work Force Strategies

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many local authorities are implementing local government pay and workforce strategies. [44950]

A People Management Survey 2005 conducted by the Employers Organisation showed that 83 per cent. of local authorities have a workforce strategy in place.

Benefit Helplines

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many staff will be answering calls on each of the benefit helplines at his Department from 23 December 2005 to 3 January 2006; and what the equivalent figures were for (a) 2004 and (b) 2003. [39178]

The number of people answering calls at any helpline may vary during each day in order to provide as consistent a level of service as possible to the varying volume of calls being received.

The information that is available is recorded in the table:

BEL (DCS)

Disability Living

Child Support Agency

Debt

Mgmt

Jobcentre Plus Direct—First Contact

Employer Direct

National Benefit Fraud Hotline

Pension Centres

2005–06

23 December 2005

22

348

185

30

1,762

60

33

745

29 December 2005

27

264

108

16

1,532(30)

80

28

770

30 December 2005

27

265

216

13

1,452

71(32)

24

709

3 January 2006

38

311

445

24

1,951

250

35

767

2004–05

24 December 2004

21

95

119

19

n/a(31)

n/a(33)

n/a(34)

n/a(35)

30 December 2004

27

149

169

21

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

31 December 2004

22

90

139

11

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

4 January 2005

41

306

286

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2003–04

23 December 2003

20

206

130

n/a(29)

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

29 December 2003

32

81

76

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

30 December 2003

38

83

114

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

31 December 2003

21

53

152

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

2 January 2004

22

208

313

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Pension Credit App Line

Pension Direct

Pension Guide Order Line

Future Pension Centre

RP

Tele Claim

IPC

Pension

Info Order Line

2005–06

23 December 2005

259

133

71

84

57

44

9

29 December 2005

n/a(36)

133

44

68

52

42

8

30 December 2005

n/a

133

45

82

49

40

7

3 January 2006

n/a

161

45

116

95

50

7

2004–05

24 December 2004

n/a

155

41

60

72

n/a(29)0 n/a

n/a(29)

30 December 2004

n/a

155

31

58

51

n/a

n/a

31 December 2004

n/a

155

46

43

36

n/a

n/a

4 January 2005

n/a

155

38

102

39

n/a

n/a

2003–04

23 December 2003

n/a

141

49

n/a(37)

88

n/a

n/a

29 December 2003

n/a

141

61

n/a

84

n/a

n/a

30 December 2003

n/a

141

56

n/a

85

n/a

n/a

31 December 2003

n/a

141

41

n/a

62

n/a

n/a

2 January 2004

n/a

171

49

n/a

77

n/a

n/a

n/a=Not available.

(29) Debt Management figures are unavailable due to installation of new IT system.

(30) In addition, Jobcentre Plus Direct, First Contact will have 194 staff answering calls from Scotland on 28 December 2005.

(31) Jobcentre Plus Direct, First Contact figures are unavailable for 2003–04 and 2004–05 as, prior to the establishment of the new organisational structure in April 2004 calls, would have been dealt with right across the dispersed regional organisation.

(32) In addition, Employer Direct will have six staff answering calls on 31 December 2005.

(33) Employer Direct has only recently joined the Jobcentre Plus Directorate, exact figures are not available for 2003–04 or 2004–05.

(34) National Benefit Fraud Hotline has only recently joined the Jobcentre Plus Directorate, exact figures are not available for 2003–04 or 2004–05.

(35) Comparable Pension centre figures are not available for 2003–04 or 2004–05.

(36) No further Pension Credit Application Line data is available.

(37) Date for the Future Pension Centre is not available for 2003–04.

(38) 0 Data for the International Pension Centre is not available for 2003–04 or 2004–05.

(39)

(40) Data for the Pension Information Order Line is not available for 2003–04 or 2004–05.

Note:

No information is available for the outsourced Winter Fuels Line.

Child Poverty

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many children were living in poverty in each year since 1975–76, measured in terms of (a) absolute low income, (b) relative low income and (c) material deprivation; and if he will make a statement. [41195]

The information requested is not available. The available information is in the tables.

Children with income below 60 per cent. of 1996–97 median income held constant in real terms, 1994–05 to 2003–04, (absolute low income) Number (Million)

Below 60 per cent. median

FRS (GB)

Before housing costs

After housing costs

1994–95

3.3

4.3

1995–96

3.2

4.4

1996–97

3.2

4.2

1997–98

3.0

4.0

1998–99

2.8

3.9

1999–2000

2.4

3.6

2000–01

2.0

3.0

2001–02

1.6

2.5

2002–03

1.5

2.2

2003–04

1.4

2.2

Children falling below 60 per cent. of contemporay median income, (relative low income) Number (Million)

Below 60 per cent. median

FRS (GB)

Before housing costs

After housing costs

1994–95

2.9

4.0

1995–96

2.8

4.0

1996–97

3.2

4.2

1997–98

3.1

4.1

1998–99

3.1

4.1

1999–2000

3.0

4.1

2000–01

2.7

3.8

2001–02

2.6

3.7

2002–03

2.6

3.6

2003–04

2.6

3.5

Notes:

1. The Family Resources Survey (FRS) data is for all financial years 1994–95 until 2003–04. Comparisons of estimates between the two sources should be treated carefully.

2. FRS figures are for Great Britain. The reference period for FRS figures is single financial years.

Source:

FRS.

Detailed information about the number and proportion of children living in low income households is published in 'Households Below Average Income 1994/95–2003/04', available in the Library. The report includes comparisons of incomes against low income thresholds, such as the commonly used relative low income threshold of 60 per cent. of contemporary median income.

Data to measure material deprivation has been collected on the Family Resources Survey since 2004. Baseline data for the material deprivation and low income combined tier of the child poverty measure will be available in spring 2006.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what proportion of children in (a) working and (b) workless households were living in relative poverty in the last period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement. [41291]

The seventh annual "Opportunity for all" report (Cm 6673) sets out the Government's strategy for tackling poverty and social exclusion and reports progress against a range of indicators. Detailed information about the number and proportion of children living in low income households is published in "Households Below Average Income 1994/95–2003/04", available in the Library. The threshold of below 60 per cent. contemporary median income is the most commonly used in reporting trends in low income.

The information requested is in the table.

Percentage of children living in households with income less than 60 per cent. of contemporary median income, Great Britain

2003–04

Percentage

Before housing costs

Working

13

Workless

55

After housing costs

Working

17

Workless

77

Notes:

1. Working households are defined as having at least one adult in work, where an adult is over 16 years of age including those above state retirement age.

2. Workless households are defined as having no adults in work.

Economic Inactivity

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will make a statement on the recent level of economic inactivity among young people. [38521]

Since 1997 the proportion of the total population aged 16–24 not in full-time education or work has gone down. Without this improvement the number of jobless young people not in full-time education would be 50,000 higher than it is now.

This reflects the success of the New Deal, which has helped in virtually eradicating long-term youth unemployment.

Incapacity Benefit

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what percentage of recipients of incapacity benefit are incapacitated as a result of (a) physical disabilities or injuries, (b) stress, depression and other mental health problems and (c) drug or alcohol dependency. [35313]

The information is not available in the format requested. There is no specific group of diagnoses that covers physical disabilities or injuries. Stress, depression and other mental health problems all fall within the mental and behavioural disorders group of diagnoses, as do drug abuse and alcoholism.

The available information is in the following table.

Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants, by diagnosis group, at 31 May 2005.

Number of IB/SDA claimants

Percentage of all diagnoses

All cases

2,784,000

100.0

Certain infectious and parasitic diseases

21,000

0.8

Neoplasms

39,900

1.4

Diseases of the blood and blood forming organs and certain diseases involving the immune mechanism

4,500

0.2

Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases

39,700

1.4

Mental and behavioural disorders

1,086,100

39.0

of which:

Alcoholism

48,000

1.7

Drug abuse

48,300

1.7

Diseases of the nervous system

166,300

6.0

Diseases of the eye and adnexa

19,700

0.7

Diseases of the ear and mastoid process

12,100

0.4

Diseases of the circulatory system

168,900

6.1

Diseases of the respiratory system

65,600

2.4

Diseases of the digestive system

43,300

1.6

Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous system

16,900

0.6

Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue

524,300

18.8

Diseases of the genitourinary system

19,800

0.7

Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium

4,700

0.2

Certain conditions originating in the perinatal period

Congenital malformations, deformations and chromosomal abnormalities

25,200

0.9

Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified

331,400

11.9

Injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes

157,500

5.7

Factors influencing health status and contact with health services

37,100

1.3

Notes:

1. Figures rounded to the nearest 100.

2. 'Claimant' figures include all incapacity benefit (IB) and severe disability allowance (SDA), including IB credits-only cases.

3. Figures for the years 1997 to 1999 have been produced using the 5 per cent. data and have been rated up proportionally using the Great Britain WPLS 100 per cent. IB/SDA totals.

4. Diagnoses are taken from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD10).

Source:

DWP Information Directorate, Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study (WPLS) 100 per cent. data.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many recipients of incapacity benefit have been in receipt of the benefit for (a) less than one year, (b) between one and two years, (c) between two and three years, (d) between three and four years, (e) between four and five years and (f) more than five years. [44951]

I refer the hon. Member to the written answer my hon. Friend the Minister for Pensions Reform (Mr. Timms) gave on 8 November 2005, Official Report, column 374W to the hon. Member for Newcastle upon Tyne, Central (Jim Cousins).

Leaked Letter

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what evidence his Department has given to the Treasury inquiry into the leaking of a letter from the Chancellor of the Exchequer to Lord Turner in November 2005; and if he will make a statement. [41343]

The Department has undertaken an investigation and provided a report for the Treasury inquiry.

New Deal

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much was spent on the New Deal in each year from 1997–98; how much has been allocated for each year to 2008–09; and if he will make a statement. [41289]

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to him on 12 January 2006, Official Report, column 807W.

Occupational Health

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will make a statement on progress on the implementation of the natural strategy for occupational health. [37169]

We published, in conjunction with the Secretary of State for Health and the Chair of the Health and Safety Commission, the strategy "Health, Work and Well-being—Caring for our future" on 19 October. This strategy is a crucial part of delivering on the Government's commitment to improving the health and well-being of the working age population.

Since its publication, ministerial colleagues and officials from all three organisations have been working hard to turn the strategy into actions which will make a real difference.

Central to the strategy's success is a commitment to partnership working and one of the three key themes is "Engaging Stakeholders". Plans for a range of stakeholder activities are well under way, including the organisation of a stakeholder summit involving all those with a part to play in improving and promoting the health and well-being of people of working age.

We are also finalising arrangements for the recruitment of a national Director for Occupational Health which we intend to advertise shortly.

Pensioners

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many single women pensioners in Stroud constituency are receiving assistance to bring them up to the minimum pension level. [35113]

At the end of September 2005 there were 2,000 single women pensioners in receipt of guarantee credit element of pension credit in the Stroud constituency.

Notes:

1. Caseloads are rounded to the nearest hundred. 2. Data from the Generalised Matching Service (GMS) 100 per cent. scan taken on 16 September 2005. The figure has been rated up to give month-end estimates. 3. These figures are early estimates. Operational processing times mean that a number of claim commencements and terminations are not reflected in the figures. The final figures incorporated within the Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study (WPLS) will take account of such cases. 4. Parliamentary constituencies are assigned by matching postcodes against the relevant ONS postcode directory.

Source:

DWP Information Directorate 100 per cent. data.

Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what proportion of mean average earnings the single person's basic state pension represented in each year since the link between uprating and earnings was broken. [34643]

The information is in the table.

Full basic state pension as a percentage of mean average earnings

1980

24.6

1981

23.7

1982

24.1

1983

23.0

1984

22.5

1985

22.4

1986

21.0

1987

19.9

1988

18.8

1989

18.2

1990

17.8

1991

18.3

1992

17.8

1993

17.7

1994

17.7

1995

17.4

1996

17.4

1997

17.0

1998

16.5

1999

16.4

2000

15.9

2001

16.1

2002

16.0

2003

15.9

2004

15.8

Notes:

1. The link with earnings was broken in November 1980.

2. The average earnings figure is for full-time employees in the April of that year and has been taken from the New Earnings Survey prior to 1998 and from Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings since 1998.

3. The year refers to the year of uprating. From 1980 to 1985 this took place in November, in 1986 it occurred in July and since 1987 annual uprating has taken place in April.

Source:

2004 Annual Abstract of Statistics published by the Department for Work and Pensions.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 7 December 2005, Official Report, column 1374W, on pensions, to the right hon. and learned Member for Kensington and Chelsea (Sir Malcolm Rifkind), if he will provide his latest estimate of the number of (a) pension scheme members who have lost pension savings as a result of their pension scheme winding up, (b) pension schemes which have completed the wind-up process since 1997 and which are not included in these figures and (c) people who have lost pension savings as a result. [38895]

With regard to part(a) and (c) of the question, the information is not available. The Government is currently inviting notifications from affected pension schemes to the Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS), and is therefore obtaining some information on the number of members facing pensions losses due to company insolvency. In due course, information will also be collected on individual members in schemes qualifying for FAS. Based on our most recent data collection for the FAS, we know of around 70,000 non pensioner members in schemes that are potentially eligible for assistance from the FAS as a result of their schemes being wound up in circumstances of insolvency or where the employer no longer exists.

With regard to part 2 April 1997. This includes all schemes that have wound up, whether fully funded or under funded. The Pensions Regulator only holds the present status of a scheme and only those schemes that have completed winding up procedures are included in these figures.(b) of the question, information in the following table was provided by the Pensions Regulator and shows the number of schemes that have wound up each year since

Effective date scheme status was

changed register to 'wound up'

Number of schemes

Total membership

2 April 1997 to 31 March 1998

8,248

54,439

1 April 1998 to 31 March 1999

7,708

71,351

1 April 1999 to 31 March 2000

8,462

64,608

1 April 2000 to 31 March 2001

6,720

65,510

1 April 2001 to 31 March 2002

5,822

128,060

1 April 2002 to 31 March 2003

6,250

145,039

1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004

6,316

127,839

1 April 2004 to 31 March 2005

4,328

78,878

Total

53,854

735,724

Notes:

1. A wound up scheme is one which has notified the Pensions Regulator (or its predecessor the Occupational Pensions Regulatory Authority) that it has completed winding up procedures.

2. Schemes are required to notify the Pensions Regulator of changes in scheme status as soon as is reasonably practical. This means that the data for the year ended 31 March 2005 is provisional.

3. The figures are based on information held on the register as at 11 January 2006. The effective date for the completion of wind up is based on the last scheme status change date.

4. Figures for 1997–8 commence on 2 April 1997 because, where the date at which the scheme completed winding up procedures, prior to 1 April 1997 cannot be ascertained, a default value of 1 April 1997 is used as the date on which the scheme wound up. As a result a very large number of schemes are recorded as wound up with a scheme status change date of 1 April 1997, even if they had wound up at some earlier date. Including schemes with this default date in the table would significantly overstate the number of schemes that wound up during 1997, so a start date of 2 April has been used for 1997–98.

5. Total membership includes active, deferred and pensioner members. It is not possible to provide a breakdown of these numbers.

6. During 2005–06 the Pensions Regulator will continue with its plans to issue a scheme return form to all occupational pension schemes that are registered in the UK. This will provide the Pension Regulator with access to enhanced data in future years.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of the cost of paying the basic state pension to all pensioners aged 75 years and above regardless of contributions (a) assuming an earnings link from 2010–11 and (b) continuing the present uprating policy in (i) each of the next four years, (ii) 2010, (iii) 2020, (iv) 2030, (v) 2040 and (vi) 2050. [37114]

The information requested is as follows:

Part(a)

Great Britain £ billion(51)

Gross cost

Net of IRBs

Net of IRBs and tax

2006

2.0

1.4

1.4

2007

2.0

1.5

1.4

2008

2.1

1.5

1.5

2009

2.2

1.6

1.5

2010

2.6

1.8

1.7

2020

8.4

4.7

4.2

2030

18.1

9.2

8.0

2040

34.0

16.6

14.2

2050

55.4

26.7

22.8

(51) 2005–06 price terms.

Part(b)

Great Britain £ billion(52)

Gross cost

Net of IRBs

Net of IRBs and tax

2006

2.0

1.4

1.4

2007

2.0

1.5

1.4

2008

2.1

1.5

1.5

2009

2.2

1.6

1.5

2010

2.2

1.6

1.5

2020

2.7

1.9

1.9

2030

2.2

1.6

1.6

2040

2.1

1.5

1.5

2050

2.3

1.7

1.6

(52) 2005–06 price terms.

Notes:

1. The policy change is assumed to take place from 2006–07. In part (a) the Basic State Pension (BSP) is assumed to be uprated by prices growth (including underpin) in 2006–07, 2007–08, 2008–09, 2009–10 and uprated by earnings growth from 2010–11. In part (b) it is assumed that the BSP would be uprated by prices growth (plus underpin).

2. Gross costs are estimated by the Government Actuary's Department and are consistent with the pre-Budget report 2005 assumptions.

3. Savings in income-related benefit (IRBs) such as pension credit and housing benefit, and potential increases in tax revenue, are estimated using the DWP policy simulation model and April 2006 benefit rates. Savings are assumed to be a constant proportion of the estimated gross cost over time.

Poverty

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what measure of poverty his Department uses; and how many people his Department defined as poor in (a) the UK and (b) Stroud constituency in each year since 1997. [39184]

Poverty is about more than low income. It is also about health, housing, education and the quality of the environment. The seventh annual "Opportunity for all" report (Cm 6673), published in October 2005, sets out the Government's strategy for tackling poverty and social exclusion and presents information on the indicators used to measure progress against this strategy.

Specific information regarding individuals living in low income households is published in "Households Below Average Income 1994/95–2003/04", available in the Library. The report includes estimates of relative low income, absolute low income, and persistent low income. A household is defined as experiencing relative low income if it has an income below a relative low income threshold, such as the commonly used relative threshold of 60 per cent. of contemporary median. A household is defined as experiencing absolute low income if it has an income below an absolute low income threshold, such as the commonly used absolute threshold of 60 per cent. of median from an historic year that has been adjusted for inflation. The Households Below Average Income report currently uses the 1996–07 median for absolute low income estimates. A household is defined as experiencing persistent low income if it has experienced relative low income for three or four years out of four consecutive years.

The number and percentage of individuals living in households with incomes below 60 per cent. of median income—known as "relative" low income—from 1996–07 to 2003–04 are presented in the following table. Figures are presented for Great Britain as results for the United Kingdom are only available from 2002–03 onwards and are not available below regional level.

Number and percentage of individuals with incomes less than 60 per cent. of contemporary median, Great Britain

Before housing costs After housing costs

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

1996–97

10.2

18

13.8

25

1997–98

10.2

18

13.3

24

1998–99

10.2

18

13.2

24

1999–2000

10.0

18

13.2

24

2000–01

9.6

17

12.7

23

2001–02

9.6

17

12.3

22

2002–03

9.7

17

12.2

22

2003–04

9.6

17

12.0

21

Note:

The table shows percentages rounded to the nearest percentage point, and numbers in millions rounded to the nearest 100,000.

Administrative Costs

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs which functions of her core Department are carried out in (a) England and (b) London; and what administration costs were associated with these functions for each area in the last year. [39827]

The total administration costs outturn of the core Department, which includes the Court Service and Public Guardianship Office, in 2004–05 was £915 million. It is not possible for the Department to provide full detailed information of the administration costs of the functions carried out by the core Department in(a) England and (b) London in the last year without incurring disproportionate costs.

The administration budgets regime overseen by the Treasury relates to Whitehall Departments only. The Department does not monitor national, regional or London administration costs separately and it is a matter for the devolved Administrations how they control their own administration costs.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs which functions of her core Department are carried out in (a) Northern Ireland and (b) Wales; and what administration costs were associated with these functions for each area in the last year. [39950]

The total administration costs outturn of the core Department, which includes the Court Service and Public Guardianship Office, in 2004–05 was £915 million. It is not possible for the Department to provide full detailed information of the administration costs of the functions carried out by the core Department in(a) Northern Ireland and (b) Wales in the last year without incurring disproportionate costs.

The administration budgets regime overseen by the Treasury relates to Whitehall Departments only. The Department does not monitor national or regional administration costs separately and it is a matter for the devolved Administrations how they control their own administration costs.

Departmental Expenditure

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what the annual expenditure on (a) fixtures and fittings, (b) general office expenses and (c) office equipment was of her (i) Department and (ii) each (A) non-departmental public body, (B) executive agency and (C) other public body for which her Department is responsible in (1) Scotland, (2) Wales, (3) each English region and (4) Northern Ireland in each of the last three financial years; and what the planned expenditure is for 2005–06 in each case. [40093]

It is not possible for the Department to provide full detailed information as requested in the question without incurring disproportionate costs.

The administration budgets regime overseen by the Treasury relates to Whitehall Departments only. The Department does not monitor national, regional or London administration costs separately and it is a matter for the devolved Administrations how they control their own administration costs.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what expenditure on (a) buildings and (b) insurance of buildings and staff was of (i) her Department and (ii) each (A) non-departmental public body, (B) executive agency and (C) other public body for which her Department is responsible in (1) Scotland, (2) Wales, (3) each English region and (4) Northern Ireland in each of the last three financial years; and what the planned expenditure is for 2005–06 in each case. [40094]

It is not possible for the Department to provide full detailed information as requested in the question without incurring disproportionate costs. However, the Department does not incur any costs to insure any of its buildings as the Crown carries the risk.

The administration budgets regime overseen by the Treasury relates to Whitehall Departments only. The Department does not monitor national or regional London administration costs separately and it is a matter for the devolved Administrations how they control their own administration costs.

Departmental Estate

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will list the former (a) buildings and (b) land of (i) her Department and (ii) (A) non-departmental public bodies, (B) agencies and (C) independent statutory bodies for which her Department is responsible which have been sold since 7 May 1997; what the sale price of each (1) was at the time of sale and (2) is at current prices; and whether the money accrued was (x) retained by her Department and (y) claimed by the Treasury. [40134]

It is not possible for the Department to provide full detailed information as requested in the question without incurring disproportionate costs.

Prisoners (Right to Vote)

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what the timetable is for the Government's formal response to the European Court of Human Rights ruling on giving prisoners the right to vote; and if she will make a statement. [43543]

The judgment raises a number of complex issues which will need careful consideration, including, in particular, what specific measures may need to be taken to implement it. The Government are giving urgent consideration to the judgment, and will indicate what steps they intends to take next shortly.

Accident and Emergency Departments

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) how many children under the age of five attended the accident and emergency department in hospitals in England in each of the last five years; [41364]

(2) what proportion of children under the age of five admitted to accident and emergency departments in hospitals in England in the last 12 months were subsequently taken into care by social services; [41377]

(3) what proportion of children under the age of five who attended accident and emergency departments in hospitals in England in the last 12 months were treated for conditions related to the consumption of inappropriate objects; [41381]

(4) how many children under the age of five years attended the accident and emergency department in hospitals in (a) Hull and (b) the East Riding in each of the last five years. [41382]

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what evidence she used when setting the target of 98 per cent. of patients being seen within four hours of attendance at accident and emergency departments. [43016]

Studies show that almost all patients, with no non-clinical delays, should be able to complete their treatment in an accident and emergency (A&E) department within four hours.

The 98 per cent. minimum operating standard was set to allow for the minority of patients who clinically require more than four hours in A&E. It followed a wide consultation with clinicians and their representative organisations.

Ambulance Service

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) how many emergency calls were answered within the Staffordshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust in each of the last five years; [42094]

(2) what proportion of emergency calls resulted in an ambulance arriving at the scene of the reported incident within the Government's target response times in Staffordshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust in each of the last five years. [42095]

The numbers of emergency calls answered by each ambulance service from 2000–05 are published in table 3 of the statistical bulletin, "Ambulance services, England: 2004–05". This is available in the Library and on the Department's website at: www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/11/36/79/04113679.pdf.

Reported performance for Staffordshire Ambulance Services National Health Service Trust, for the years 2000–01 to 2004–05 is shown in the table.

Percentage of category A calls responded to within 8 minutes

Percentage of category A calls responded to within 19 minutes

Percentage of category B/C calls responded to within 19 minutes

Percentage of arrivals not more than 15 minutes late, for urgent journeys

2000–01

87.4

99.8

99.6

93.3

2001–02

87.5

99.6

99.6

91.1

2002–03

86.4

99.8

99.7

92.6

2003–04

86.6

99.7

99.7

95.1

2004–05

88.3

99.8

99.8(54)

95.1

(54) Data for category B calls for the period October 2004 to March 2005.

Further information can be found in the statistical bulletin.

Assessment Care Plans

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what account her Department takes of the supporting people assessment in the guidance for the single assessment process; and how the resulting single assessment care plan operates in relation to the support plan. [41900]

Guidance on the single assessment process (SAP) does not formally extend to housing authorities or other statutory agencies. However, it is recognised that, for many older people, housing services can make important contributions to promoting independence and well-being. Where possible, local national health service bodies and councils are encouraged to engage with housing authorities as they implement the SAP. In addition, where local assessment for housing services has been incorporated into the SAP for older people, it is also expected that all services which are provided are reflected in the care plan and any associated support plan.

Furthermore, as the hon. Member will be aware from replies given by the Minister for Local Government, the hon. Member for Oldham, East and Saddleworth (Mr. Woolas) on 14 December 2005, Official Report, columns 1970–71W, there is no standardised process for supporting people assessments.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans she has to revise single assessment process guidance to cover (a) housing-related needs and (b) housing-related service options. [41906]

There are no plans at this time to revise the single assessment process (SAP) guidance to cover housing-related needs and housing-related service options. However, as set out in the Office of Deputy Prime Minister consultation, "Creating Sustainable Communities: Supporting People", work is planned to consider how housing-related support might be made part of integrated assessment processes. We will consider at the appropriate time whether this work might require changes to SAP or other relevant guidance.

Brain Tumours (Treatment)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps are being taken by her Department to improve access to rehabilitation services for brain tumour patients. [42487]

The Department scoping study is looking at rehabilitation services, including those for brain tumour patients, currently provided by the national health service and social care, with the aim of:

mapping levels of provision and models of service and, where possible, the cost-effectiveness of rehabilitative services;

identifying any gaps in provision;

identifying good practice exemplars; and

identifying opportunities to improve services

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence is producing guidance on "Improving Outcomes in Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumours". It will include advice on rehabilitation services for patients with these forms of cancer. A second draft of this guidance has recently been consulted on and the final guidance is due to be issued in June 2006.

Child Health (West Cheshire)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many children under the age of 10 years in (a) West Cheshire Primary Care Trust and (b) Eddisbury constituency have (i) osteogenesis imperfecta and (ii) ligamentous lexity. [42670]

Children's Hospices

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) what guidance has been issued to primary care trusts about commissioning care from children's hospices; [31474]

(2) what assessment she has made of the funding of children's hospices, [31475]

(3) if she will list the sums paid to children's hospices by each primary care trust in the last year for which figures are available. [31478]

holding answer 24 November 2005

In our guide "Commissioning Children's and Young People's Palliative Care Services", launched on 29 November 2005, we give commissioners important advice about the key aspects of children's palliative care which will improve the quality of commissioning and provision of services. This practical guide will stimulate improvements in commissioning and promote quality care for children, young people and their families in a range of settings, for example, palliative care at home, in hospital or in a hospice.

Primary care trusts (PCTs) working with their local authority partners and stakeholders, remain best placed to decide the level and range of palliative care needed by the children and young people in their locality and are able to respond directly to their needs. We have extended our manifesto pledge to increase funding for end of life care to include care for children and young people. We will make further announcements on this funding as soon as we can.

Information is not collected centrally on the amount of funding children's hospices receive from PCTs.

Dentistry

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what proportion of people in Beverley and Holderness were registered with an NHS dentist in each of the last 10 years for which records are available. [41366]

The available information, at primary care trust (PCT) level, is shown in the table.

Proportion of patients registered in PCTs serving the Beverley and Holderness constituency as at 30 September each year Percentage

East Yorkshire PCT

Yorkshire Wolds and Coast PCT

1997

46.8

45.0

1998

44.2

38.0

1999

42.9

40.8

2000

43.1

41.4

2001

43.1

41.0

2002

43.6

39.5

2003

42.6

38.8

2004

39.6

39.6

2005

40.1

35.7

Notes:

1. 2004 and 2005 data includes General Dental Service (CDS) and Personal Dental Service (PDS) registrations/PDS patients seen (counts patients seen in the past 15 months for some PDS schemes).

2. Data for 2003 and earlier do not include those PDS schemes that do not have any registrations (eg Dental Access Centres), and is therefore not directly comparable with 2004 and 2005 data.

3. Most PDS schemes that have registrations have re-registration periods in excess of fifteen months, so the figures for PDS schemes are generally higher than they would have been for the same attendance pattern under GDS.

4. Proxy registrations are not available at constituency level.

5. 1997–2000 percentages have been calculated using 2001 population data.

6. 2005 percentages have been calculated using 2004 population data.

Source:

Dental Practice Board

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what percentage of children in Beverley and Holderness constituency are registered with an NHS dentist. [41369]

Information on children registered with a dentist at constituency level is not available as a percentage of the total number of children because population data is not available at constituency level.

Table one gives the total number of children registered with a dentist since 1997 in Beverley and Holderness.

Table 1: General Dental Services (GDS) and Personal Dental Services (PDS)Number of children registered with a national health service dentist in Beverley and Holderness constituency, East Yorkshire primary care trust (PCT) and Yorkshire Wolds and Coast PCT as at 30 September each year. Beverley and Holderness constituency is served by both PCT's.

Beverley and Holderness constituency

East

Yorkshire PCT

Yorkshire Wolds and Coast PCT

1997

10,915

23,669

16,558

1998

10,614

22,747

14,802

1999

10,956

22,306

15,442

2000

12,258

23,488

15,752

2001

12,476

22,644

16,038

2002

12,312

22,730

15,439

2003

12,087

22,005

15,210

2004

11,676

21,650

15,048

2005

11,277

21,819

13,921

Table two shows the percentage of children registered in each of the local PCTs.

Table 2: Proportion of children registered with a dentist in East Yorkshire PCT and Yorkshire Wolds and Coast PCT as at 30 September in each specified year Percentage

East Yorkshire PCT

Yorkshire Wolds and Coast PCT

1997

64.6

54.5

1998

62.1

48.8

1999

60.9

50.9

2000

64.1

51.9

2001

61.8

52.9

2002

62.1

50.4

2003

60.2

49.7

2004

59.3

49.2

2005

59.8

45.5

Notes:

1. 2004 and 2005 data includes GDS and PDS registrations/PDS patients seen (counts patients seen in the past 15 months for some PDS schemes).

2. Data for 2003 and earlier do not include those PDS schemes that do not have any registrations (e.g. dental access centres), and is therefore not directly comparable with 2004 and 2005 data.

3. Most PDS schemes that have registrations have re-registration periods in excess of fifteen months, so the figures for PDS schemes are generally higher than they would have been for the same attendance pattern under GDS.

4. Proxy registrations are not available at constituency level.

5. 1997 to 2000 percentages have been calculated using 2001 population data.

6. 2005 percentages have been calculated using 2004 population data.

Source:

Dental Practice Board

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people in Westmorland and Lonsdale were registered with an NHS dentist in each of the last 10 years for which records are available. [42387]

holding answer 16 January 2006

The information requested is shown in the table.

General dental services (GDS) and personal dental services (PDS), number of people registered with a national health service dentist in Westmorland and Lonsdale constituency in September each year

Number of patients

1997

58,994

1998

54,923

1999

56,870

2000

58,751

2001

59,400

2002

58,926

2003

54,793

2004

53,642

2005

45,857

Notes:

1. 2004 and 2005 data includes GDS and PDS registrations/PDS patients seen (counts patients seen in the past 15 months for some PDS schemes).

2. Data for 2003 and earlier does not include those PDS schemes that do not have any registrations, for example, dental access centres, and is therefore not directly comparable with 2004 and 2005 data.

3. Most PDS schemes that have registrations have re-registration periods in excess of 15 months, so the figures for PDS schemes are generally higher than they would have been for the same attendance pattern under GDS.

4. This information was provided by the Dental Practice Board and relates to patients registered with dentists whose practice address postcodes are within the constituency boundary.

Source:

Dental Practice Board.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what percentage of the population in the area served by Croydon Primary Care Trust was registered with an NHS dentist in each year since 1997. [42793]

The information requested is provided in the table.

General dental services and personal dental services—estimated percentage of the population registered in Croydon primary care trust as at 30 September each year

Estimated percentage of population

1997

56

1998

45

1999

47

2000

44

2001

44

2002

44

2003

45

2004

41

2005

42

Notes:

1. The percentages of the population registered with a dentist (or registration rate) have been estimated by including patient registrations in the area of the dentist, that is according to the postcode of the dental surgery and not the patient's address. So the registration rates for some areas may be affected by some patients receiving dental treatment in a different area from the one in which they live.

2. Estimates have been calculated using population estimates for the nearest year for which data are available. 1997–2000 percentages have been calculated using 2001 population estimates. 2005 percentages have been calculated using 2004 population estimates.

Source:

NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many NHS dentists per head of the population were practising in Lancashire in each year since 1997. [43161]

The information requested is shown in the table.

General dental services and personal dental services Dentists per 10,000 population in Cumbria and Lancashire strategic health authority as at 30 September each year

Dentists per 10,000 population

1997

3.43

1998

3.53

1999

3.59

2000

3.52

2001

3.64

2002

3.58

2003

3.60

2004

3.76

2005

4.10

Notes:

1. 2005 data calculated using Office for National Statistics 2004 mid-year population estimates based on the 2001 census.

2. Figures have been rounded to two decimal places.

Source:

NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre.

Departmental Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much was spent on advertising by (a) her Department, (b) each (i) non-departmental public body and (ii) executive agency for which her Department is responsible and (c) each independent statutory body, organisation and body financially sponsored by her Department in each year since May 1997. [39070]

The table shows the expenditure on major information campaigns and advertising commissioned by the Department's Communications Directorate in each year since 1997.

£ million

Financial year

Advertising expenditure

1997–98

2.04

1998–99

8.53

1999–2000

15.17

2000–01

20.80

2001–02

20.40

2002–03

23.13

2003–04

38.98

2004–05

32.7

2005–06(55)

23

(55) Estimate.

We have no central record of advertising spend by non-departmental public bodies, executive agencies or independent statutory bodies or organisations financially sponsored by the Department and could not obtain these without incurring disproportionate costs.

General Practitioners

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many general practitioners were paid (a) £130,000 to £150,000, (b) £110,000 to £129,999, (c) £90,000 to £109,999, (d) £70,000 to £89,999 and (e) £50,000 to £69,999 in 2004–05; and how many in each category worked (i) full-time and (ii) part-time. [40354]

Data on general practitioners paid between £150,000 and £50,000 in 2004–05 and split between full-time and part-time is not available centrally.

Hospital Treatment (Lincolnshire)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients from (a) North Lincolnshire and (b) North East Lincolnshire received hospital treatment in Hull in each of the last three years for which figures are available. [43064]

The table shows the counts of finished consultant episodes and patients at the Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals National Health Service Trust where the patients are resident within the North Lincolnshire Primary Care Trust (PCT) and the North East Lincolnshire PCT.

Counts of finished consultant episodes and patients provider of treatment: Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust NHS Hospitals, England 2002–03 to 2004–05

PCT of residence

Finished consultant episodes

Patient counts

(a) North Lincolnshire PCT

2002–03

3,127

2,031

2003–04

3,288

2,074

2004–05

3,550

2,112

(b) North East Lincolnshire PCT

2002–03

1,559

1,088

2003–04

1,762

1,170

2004–05

2,085

1,308

Notes:

1. Finished consultant episode (FCE)

A FCE is defined as a period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. Please note that the figures do not represent the number of patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the year.

2. Patient counts

Patient counts are based on the unique hospital episode statistics (HES) patient identifier (HESID). This identifier is derived based on patient's date of birth, postcode, sex, local patient identifier and NHS number, using an agreed algorithm. Where data are incomplete, HESID might erroneously link episodes or fail to recognise episodes for the same patient. Care is therefore needed, especially where duplicate records persist in the data. The patient count cannot be summed across a table where patients may have episodes in more than one cell.

3. Primary care trust (PCT) and strategic health authority (SHA) data quality

PCT and SHA data were added to historic data-years in the HES database using 2002–03 boundaries, as a one-off exercise in 2004. The quality of the data on PCT of treatment and SHA of treatment are poor in 1996–97, 1997–98 and 1998–99, with over a third of all finished episodes having missing values in these years. Data quality of PCT of general practitioner (GP) practice and SHA of GP practice in 1997–98 and 1998–99 are also poor, with a high proportion missing values where practices changed or ceased to exist. There is less change in completeness of the residence-based fields over time, where the majority of unknown values are due to missing postcodes on birth episodes. Users of time series analysis including these years need to be aware of these issues in their interpretation of the data.

4. Ungrossed data

Figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data (ie the data are ungrossed).

Source:

Hospital Episode Statistics, Health and Social Care Information Centre.

Little Haven Children's Hospice

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will visit Little Haven Children's Hospice in Castle Point to review the work of the hospice and its funding levels. [42220]

We greatly value the work undertaken by children's hospices, such as Little Haven, in providing hospice care as part of the mix of palliative care services needed by families with a child who has a life-threatening condition. I am pleased to have already been able to visit a number of palliative care settings, including children's hospices.

Our guide "Commissioning Children's and Young People's Palliative Care Services", launched on 29 November, has given commissioners important advice about the key aspects of children's palliative care which will improve the quality of commissioning and provision of services. This practical guide will stimulate improvements in commissioning and promote quality care for children, young people and their families in a range of settings, for example, palliative care at home, in hospital or in a hospice.

The funding Little Haven may receive from the national health service is a matter for negotiation between the hospice and the local primary care trusts who contract for their services. I understand an agreement is in place.

NHS Walk-in Centres

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) how much NHS walk-in centres have cost in each year since their establishment; [41960]

(2) how many attendances there have been at walk-in centres in each quarter since 1 January 2003. [41997]

National health service walk-in centres are managed locally by their host primary care trust or NHS trust. They are not separate accounting entities and their running costs are not routinely collected or held centrally by the Department.

Data on the number of visits to NHS walk-in centres in each quarter from January 2003 to September 2005, the latest full quarter for which data are available, are shown in the table.

Visits to NHS walk-in centres

Period

Number

January to March 2003

335,358

April to June 2003

391,940

July to September 2003

412,829

October to December 2003

387,570

January to March 2004

389,784

April to June 2004

477,667

July to September 2004

503,144

October to December 2004

516,406

January to March 2005

571,305

April to June 2005

652,367

July to September 2005

667,045

Source:

Department of Health

Primary Care Trusts

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the allocations to each primary care trust within the Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire Strategic Health Authority were in each of the last three years; and what the capital allocations to each primary care trust were in each year. [41816]

The 2003–04 to 2005–06 revenue allocations to primary care trusts (PCTs) were announced in December 2002. The table shows the revenue allocations made to PCTs within the Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire Strategic Health Authority (SHA) for this period.

Allocation Three year total increase

PCT

2003–04 (£000)

2004–05 (£000)

2005–06 (£000)

£000

Percentage

Bath and North East Somerset

140,354

153,237

167,238

38,915

30.33

Bristol North

204,387

223,245

243,728

56,928

30.48

Bristol South and West

171,215

186,424

202,688

45,779

29.18

Cheltenham and Tewkesbury

124,221

136,208

148,726

35,685

31.57

Cotswold and Vale

159,474

173,643

188,390

42,208

28.87

Kennet and North Wilts

150,973

164,383

178,727

40,380

29.19

North Somerset

151,428

166,342

182,185

44,653

32.47

South Gloucestershire

172,121

188,320

205,893

48,895

31.14

South Wiltshire

99,642

108,493

117,958

26,642

29.18

Swindon

152,323

166,721

182,319

43,428

31.27

West Gloucestershire

188,232

206,016

224,782

53,137

30.96

West Wiltshire

90,474

99,238

108,621

26,316

31.97

In addition, revenue allocations, covering 2006–07 and 2007–08 were announced in February 2005. The revenue allocations made to PCTs in the Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire SHA for 2006–07 and 2007–08 are shown in the table.

Allocation Two year total increase

PCT

2006–07 (£000)

2007–08 (£000)

£000

Percentage

Bath and North East Somerset

206,371

224,569

34,023

17.9

Bristol North

287,627

312,296

46,649

17.6

Bristol South and West

239,350

258,885

37,583

17.0

Cheltenham and Tewkesbury

181,446

198,605

32,341

19.5

Cotswold and Vale

222,132

240,253

34,858

17.0

Kennet and North Wiltshire

211,111

231,784

38,344

19.8

North Somerset

225,201

251,427

45,126

21.9

South Gloucestershire

250,189

275,190

45,949

20.0

South Wiltshire

145,066

156,897

22,757

17.0

Swindon

223,813

243,943

37,330

18.1

West Gloucestershire

266,091

292,350

48,551

19.9

West Wiltshire

134,671

150,935

31,015

25.9

Comparisons between allocations rounds cannot be made, for the following reasons:

revenue allocations were made to health authorities for the period 2000–01 to 2002–03;

changes are made to the weighted capitation formula for each allocations round, therefore, comparisons would not be on a like with like basis;

2003–06 revenue allocations were made direct to PCTs, for the first time, and were on a three yearly basis; and

2006–08 is the first year that primary medical services were incorporated onto revenue allocations.

Capital allocations to PCTs in Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire SHA are shown in the table. Capital allocations for 2006–07 have not yet been announced.

£000

Operational capital allocation

PCT

2003–04

2004–05

2005–06

Bath and North East Somerset

1,164

1,245

1,333

Bristol North

153

174

197

Bristol South and West

180

205

232

Cheltenham and Tewkesbury

177

189

202

Cotswold and Vale

692

741

800

Kennet and North Wilts

1,124

1,202

1,286

North Somerset

102

109

116

South Gloucestershire

122

131

140

South Wiltshire

33

35

38

Swindon

224

239

256

West Gloucestershire

255

272

292

West Wiltshire

488

522

559

Podiatrists

To ask the Secretary of State for Health

(1) how many vacancies there were within the NHS for podiatrists on average in (a) 2003, (b) 2004 and (c) 2005; [41089]

(2) how many NHS podiatrists successfully completed their training in (a) 2003, (b) 2004 and (c) 2005; [41090]

(3) how many people began training in podiatry in (a) 2003, (b) 2004 and (c) 2005. [41091]

Information on the number of people beginning or completing training in podiatry is not available centrally.

Information on the number of training places commissioned in chiropody and podiatry from 2002–03 to 2004–05 is shown in the table.

Commissioned training places in chiropody and podiatry

Number of training places

2002–03

427

2003–04

451

2004–05

559

Notes:

QMR=NMET quarterly monitoring reports

Source:

QMR Q4, Department of Health

Information on the number and rate of vacancies for chiropodists/podiatrists lasting three months or more in each of the last three years is shown in the table.

Three-month vacancy rate and number for all chiropodists/podiatrists in England as at 31 March 2003–05

Number

Percentage

2005

97

3.0

2004

60

1.9

2003

37

1.3

Notes:

1. Three month vacancies are vacancies which trusts are actively trying to fill, which had lasted for three months or more (full-time equivalents).

2. Three month vacancy rates are three month vacancies expressed as a percentage of three month vacancies plus staff in post.

Source:

NHS Vacancy Survey

There has been considerable growth in the national health service chiropody/podiatry workforce. In September 2004, there were 3,941 qualified NHS chiropodists/podiatrists; this represents an increase of 655 or 20 per cent. since 1997.

Sex Offenders

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many individuals whose names appear on the (a) Protection of Children Act list and (b) Protection of Vulnerable Adults list are employed by (i) NHS organisations and (ii) social services departments; and how many individuals employed by (A) NHS organisations and (B) social services departments have committed an offence listed under Schedule 1 to the Sex Offenders Act 1997. [43451]

holding answer 19 January 2006

The responsibility for carrying out pre-employment checks, including Criminal Records Bureau, Protection of Children Act and Protection of Vulnerable Adults checks where applicable, rests with the relevant employer, whether a national health service organisation or social services department or other regulated provider of health or social care. The NHS is required to follow the guidance, "Safer Recruitment" issued in May 2005 which covers all the pre and post-appointment checks that NHS employers are required to make before appointing anyone—including employees, volunteers, students and trainees—to a position in the NHS. In regulated social care, providers must comply with regulations on pre-employment checks made under the Care Standards Act 2000 which came into force in April 2002.

Part two of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 replaced part one of the Sex Offenders Act 1997 and schedule three to the 2003 Act came into force on 1 May 2004. The Act requires convicted sex offenders to report each year to their local police and inform the police if they change their name and address within three days instead of the previous 14 days.

The Department does not hold information about NHS and social care employees of the kind requested.

Treatment Costs

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average cost was per patient per bed of treatment in (a) the Royal Shrewsbury hospital, (b) the Princess Royal hospital in Telford and (c) the community hospital in (i) Bridgnorth, (ii) Ludlow and (iii) Bishop's Castle in (A) 2003, (B) 2004 and (C) 2005. [38635]

holding answer 20 December 2005

There is no data collected centrally at individual patient per bed level. Data is collected on a finished consultant episode basis and at national health service trust level, within which one or more hospitals will operate.

Department of Agriculture and Rural Development

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many Department of Agriculture and Rural Development staff are engaged in a monitoring role for each leader company in Northern Ireland; and at what cost in the last period for which figures are available. [44917]

The Department of Agriculture and Rural Development's Rural Development Division (RDD) has 2 Monitoring Officers, which equates to 1.8 full time equivalent posts. In 2005 the 12 Local Action Groups (LAGs), which deliver LEADER+ funding, received one monitoring visit each. This visit was comprised of the following:

two days preparation

one day visit to the LAG

four days resolving outstanding issues and preparing a report.

This is a cost per LAG of £792.51.

Ministerial Meetings

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many meetings with his officials have been requested (a) by officials in the Fisheries Division of his Department and (b) by Lord Rooker since his appointment as Minister for Agriculture and Rural Development; and how many briefings he (i) has requested from officials in the Fisheries Division and (ii) has received. [44771]

Officials are always available to meet Ministers as and when necessary. Lord Rooker has met with officials at their request, on at least five occasions and once at the request of the Minister. The Minister has received briefing on more than 30 occasions. All of these have been initiated with fisheries officials in line with their duty to keep the Minister informed in issues of significance.

New School Buildings

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland which (a) primary and (b) post-primary schools in the (i) controlled and (ii) maintained sectors in East Londonderry constituency are scheduled to have new school buildings within the next 10 years. [44063]

In the East Londonderry constituency, there are currently 11 schemes in planning, four of which have been approved for funding—one controlled primary school scheme (Carnalridge), one maintained primary rationalisation scheme (Dungiven, Largy and Burnfoot), one controlled post-primary scheme (Coleraine college) and one controlled special schools amalgamation scheme (Glasvey and Limegrove).

There are seven schemes that have been identified by the relevant school authorities to the Department of Education as requiring a major capital works scheme and have been assessed by the Department as having a need for a scheme. These are currently in various stages of planning and the progressing of these schemes will be dependent on the availability of resources, and the planning, procurement and construction work required. These schemes are:

Controlled primary

Ballykelly

Maintained primary

St. Canice's, Dungiven

Crossroads, Kilrea

St. Patrick's, Portrush

Integrated primary

Millstrand, Portrush

Controlled post-primary

Coleraine High School

Voluntary grammar school

Dominican College, Portstewart

The relevant school authorities have also identified to the Department within their five-year plans the following schools for future assessment.

Controlled primary

Drumachose, Limavady

Millburn, Coleraine

Killowen, Coleraine

Macosquin, Coleraine

Portstewart

Gorran, Aghadowey

Culcrow, Aghadowey

Cullycapple, Aghadowey

Maintained post-primary

St. Patrick's High School, Dungiven

In examining all proposals for new school buildings it will be important that in a situation of falling pupil numbers that schools are assessed as being viable in the longer term before funding approval is given.

Re-offending

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many people in Northern Ireland who have served a prison sentence have been convicted of a further subsequent offence and re-imprisoned in each of the last five years. [44887]

The table shows the number of offenders who have been discharged from prison and reconvicted with a subsequent custodial sentence. A two year reconviction period is the standard adopted in reconviction studies. Thus, those offenders discharged from prison during 2001 are followed up for a two year period to determine if a valid reconviction has occurred. Data for 2002 (i.e. reconvictions to 31 December 2004) is currently being validated.

Offenders discharged from prison and reconvicted within two years—2001

Number

Percentage

Total prison discharges

703

Reconvicted within two years

(any disposal, including prison)

317

45.1

Reconvicted within two years

(subsequent prison sentence)

133

14.7

Schools

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what guidance the Department for Education, issues to schools about the employment of ex-offenders. [43554]

In 1999 the Department of Education issued the document "Pastoral Care in Schools: Child Protection" but has not issued any specific guidance to schools on the employment of ex-offenders. I have asked that this is done as a matter of urgency working with the Children's Commissioner and NSPCC. Currently employers can and do take advice from the police, social services, the Probation Service, the ELBs' Child Protection officers and the Department if they are in any doubt about how to proceed in any given case.

Tourism

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps his Department is taking to encourage tourism in Northern Ireland. [43716]

Responsibility for promoting tourism in Northern Ireland is shared between the Northern Ireland Tourist Board (NITB), which provides strategic direction, and Tourism Ireland Ltd. (TIL) which markets Northern Ireland as part of the island of Ireland in key overseas markets.

NITB's Strategic Framework for Action 2004–2007 provides the basis for its activities. These include the development of five Signature Projects which will provide anchor tourist attractions across Northern Ireland. In addition, NITB is developing a series of "Winning Themes" which include the promotion of business, activity and cultural tourism. These initiatives will be marketed aggressively by NITB within the island of Ireland and by TIL overseas.

Websites

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland

(1) if he will list the websites that come under his Department's responsibility; what the cost was of each in the last year for which figures are available; and how many visitors there were to each site in that year; [15900]

(2) when he will reply to question 15900, tabled by the hon. Member for Brent, East on 21 July. [40748]

I apologise to the hon. Member for the delay in providing this response. This was due to an administrative error.

The Northern Ireland Office (NIO) is responsible for three websites, the NIO website, Organised Crime Task Force (OCTF) website, and the Criminal Justice Services Northern Ireland (CJSNI) website. Associated costs for each website and number of visitors for the period January 2005 to December 2005 are as follows:

Website

Design

costs (£)

Yearly maintenance costs (£)

Number of unique visitors (January to December 2005)

Northern Ireland Office

0

7,200

156,457

Organised Crime Task Force

11,406.90

400

21,811

Criminal Justice Services

Northern Ireland

3,507.51

3,305

7,374

Audible Fire Alarms

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of the premises occupied by her Department is fitted with audible fire alarms. [42882]

All premises occupied by the Department have audible fire alarms or sounders, i.e. fire bells.

Academies

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if she will list the civil servants in her Department's new projects remit who are responsible for action in respect of academies; what the (a) grade and (b) role in the Department is of each; and if she will list the actions they undertake in respect of academies. [44549]

The disclosure of the names of civil servants in the Academies Group's New Projects Unit is not compatible with the principles of the Data Protection Act. I have therefore given the grades and responsibilities of those staff in the following table:

Title

Grade

Role/actions

Head of New Projects

Grade 5

Head of Unit; Oversight of sponsor brokering; allocates academy projects to Project Leads; reports to Ministers on progress towards 2010 target.

Project Lead (x2)

Grade 7

Lead official on early academy project negotiations; supporting development of formal expression of interest progressing to submission for ministerial approval.

Team Leader—Internal Relations

Grade 7

Management of New Projects Office; correspondence and briefing; NPU contact for internal Dept policy meetings.

Team Leader—External Relations

Grade 7

Management of sponsor relations; lead official on due diligence policy; liaison with Specialist Schools and Academies Trust.

Assistant Project Lead (X2)

Higher Executive Officer

Support to Project lead.

Internal Relations/Sponsor Support

Higher Executive Officer

Support to Heads of Internal and External Relations.

Ministerial Priorities

Fast Streamer

Direct support to Minister, Director of Academies and Head of NPU briefing on potential academy projects and leading on early academy project negotiations.

Child Care

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many (a) full-time and (b) part-time child care places have been available in each year since 1997, broken down by area. [43797]

The Department is unable to provide details of part-time child care places available as such data has not been collected.

A list of child care places available broken down by local authority since 2003 is as follows.

Child care places

March

Local authority

2003

2004

2005

Barking and Dagenham

1,987

2,244

2,316

Barnet

6,371

6,666

7,567

Barnsley

2,367

3,038

3,465

Bath and North East Somerset

3,223

3,346

3,741

Bedfordshire

7,840

8,766

8,427

Bexley

2,981

3,440

3,739

Birmingham

22,378

24,927

26,106

Blackburn UA

2,714

3,693

4,078

Blackpool UA

3,091

3,435

3,693

Bolton

5,856

6,901

7,202

Bournemouth UA

2,514

3,311

4,141

Bracknell Forest UA

3,312

3,592

3,403

Bradford

7,837

9,251

10,077

Brent

4.281

4,955

5,208

Brighton and Hove UA

5,276

5,758

6,211

Bristol

8,024

9,026

8,993

Bromley

5,008

5,737

6,237

Buckinghamshire

11,043

12,254

12,907

Bury

5,797

6,348

6,835

Calderdale

4,862

5,493

6,097

Cambridgeshire

13,509

15,106

16,116

Camden

4,486

4,719

4,600

Cheshire

17,026

18,605

19,485

City Of London

308

430

475

Cornwall

6,984

8,520

9,390

Coventry

6,437

7,203

7,806

Croydon

7,299

8,046

9,434

Cumbria

6,121

8,456

9,474

Darlington UA

2,371

2,666

2,829

Derby UA

5,510

6,149

6,355

Derbyshire

11,828

12,773

13,916

Devon

13,694

14,425

15,407

Doncaster

3,478

4,423

5,275

Dorset

5,894

6,372

7,036

Dudley

4,528

4,880

5,094

Durham

7,078

7,998

8,534

Ealing

5,795

6,574

6,989

East Riding of Yorkshire

5,818

6.510

6,523

East Sussex

8,190

10,040

10,667

Enfield

4,275

4,670

4,887

Essex

21,064

22,213

23,281

Gateshead

3,343

3,806

4,395

Gloucestershire

14,174

14,358

14,759

Greenwich

4,485

5,097

5,473

Hackney

2,908

3,455

5,106

Halton UA

1,960

3,164

3,327

Hammersmith and Fulham

2,835

3,158

3,799

Hampshire

27,288

31,769

33,592

Haringey

2,493

3,330

3,926

Harrow

2,905

3,397

3,456

Hartlepool UA

1,474

2,007

2,433

Havering

2,445

2,904

3,373

Herefordshire

4,126

4,498

4,530

Hertfordshire

23,256

26,983

28,254

Hillingdon

4,971

5,226

5,111

Hounslow

3,311

3,637

4,190

Isle Of Wight

3,159

3,385

3,620

Isles Of Scilly

187

111

110

Islington

4,325

4,567

4,903

Kensington and Chelsea

3,023

3,289

3,405

Kent

24,589

27,943

30,754

Kingston Upon Hull

3,515

4,035

4,340

Kingston Upon Thames

2,932

3,428

3,778

Kirklees

7,585

8,466

9,068

Knowsley

2,763

3,239

3,826

Lambeth

4,551

5,641

6,268

Lancashire

22,538

26,391

29,008

Leeds

15,776

16,178

17,001

Leicester UA

5,886

6,028

6,216

Leicestershire

12,125

13,857

14,485

Lewisham

4,683

5,712

6,163

Lincolnshire

12,129

13,828

14,484

Liverpool

7,396

9,006

10,062

Luton UA

2,286

3,184

3,726

Manchester

9,723

11,101

11,325

Medway

5,122

5,856

6,298

Merton

3,821

4,554

4,883

Middlesbrough

3,129

2,983

3,235

Milton Keynes UA

5,874

6,536

7,682

NE Lincolnshire

1,578

2,199

2,597

Newcastle Upon Tyne

4,710

5,338

5,515

Newham

3,886

5,078

5,263

Norfolk

10,674

13,435

14,023

North Lincolnshire

2,028

2,420

2,746

North Somerset

3,084

3,766

4,326

North Tyneside

2,776

4,067

3,962

North Yorkshire

11,793

13,593

13,717

Northamptonshire

12,813

14,827

16,416

Northumberland

5,636

6,391

6,877

Nottingham UA

6,234

6,725

6,854

Nottinghamshire

15,819

18,180

18,262

Oldham

4,542

6,148

6,473

Oxfordshire

16,221

18,276

18,514

Peterborough UA

4,554

5,569

5,972

Plymouth

4,656

5,567

5,981

Poole UA

2,216

2,501

2,580

Portsmouth UA

4,432

5.002

5,631

Reading

3,656

4,614

4,619

Redbridge

3,538

4,129

5,180

Redcar and Cleveland UA

1,903

2,560

2,554

Richmond Upon Thames

4,354

4,777

5,344

Rochdale

4,957

5,662

5,334

Rotherham

3,297

3,875

3,954

Rutland UA

787

951

1,070

Salford

4,589

5,392

5,504

Sandwell

4,276

4,907

4,813

Sefton

3,573

4,472

4,719

Sheffield

9,732

11,460

12,489

Shropshire

6,118

6,893

7,320

Slough UA

2,187

2,080

2,575

Solihull

5,644

5,672

6,060

Somerset

9,846

10,635

10,815

South Gloucestershire

5,070

5,540

6,072

South Tyneside

1,934

3,746

3,195

Southampton UA

3,755

5,220

5,387

Southend UA

2,342

3,166

3,276

Southwark

6,156

7,162

8,481

St. Helens

2,534

3,045

4,028

Staffordshire

18,482

21,321

22,463

Stockport

6,322

6,915

7,361

Stockton-On-Tees UA

2,810

3,607

4,049

Stoke-On-Trent

4,544

5,150

5,560

Suffolk

8,504

11,430

12,802

Sunderland

3,155

3,645

4,317

Surrey

26,021

27,856

28,921

Sutton

3,108

3,568

4,228

Swindon

4,406

5,133

5,400

Tameside

4,564

5,252

5,810

Telford And Wrekin UA

4,540

4,733

4,476

Thurrock UA

1,861

2,565

2,660

Torbay UA

1,691

2,385

2,491

Tower Hamlets

2,688

3,343

3,538

Trafford

6,693

7,459

7,229

Wakefield

3,466

4,260

5,099

Walsall

3,885

4,757

4,665

Waltham Forest

5,189

5,555

5,501

Wandsworth

7,338

8,209

8,410

Warrington UA

6,233

7,176

7,025

Warwickshire

11,931

13,086

14,183

West Berks

5,055

4,687

5,373

West Sussex

13,865

15,491

17,007

Westminster

3,093

3,300

3,058

Wigan

5,528

6,681

7,122

Wiltshire

10,871

11,500

12,464

Windsor and Maidenhead UA

3,817

4,370

4,710

Wirral

6,403

6,888

7,203

Wokingham UA

5,112

5,100

5,486

Wolverhampton

4,317

4,522

5,024

Worcestershire

12,739

14,451

14,365

York UA

4,149

4,186

4,393

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what responses she has received to the consultation on expanding the home child carers scheme. [43944]

The consultation "Childcare: extending protection and broadening support" closed on 16 August 2004 with 149 responses having been received. Overall the majority of respondents agreed with the proposals. Details of the responses can be found on the DfES consultation website at: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/consultations/conResults.cfm? consultationld=1247

Class Sizes

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the average spending per child in primary schools was in each local education authority in each year since 1997. [44331]

holding answer 20 January 2006

The information requested is contained within the following table:

Pre-primary and primary school based expenditure per pupil (1997–98 to 2004–05)(69)(70)(71)(72)(73)(74)(75)(76)

1997–98 1998–99 1999–2000*

Pre-primary and primary education

Pre-primary and primary education

Primary education

Pre-primary and primary education

England

1,740

1,870

2,010

2,050

Barking and Dagenham

1,970

2,160

2,250

2,270

Barnet

1,860

1,960

2,390

2,410

Barnsley

1,560

1,680

1,840

1,860

Bath and NE Somerset

1,720

1,820

2,010

2,060

Bedfordshire

1,750

1,780

1,970

2,000

Berkshire

1,610

Bexley

1,590

1,770

1,930

1,960

Birmingham

1,940

2,200

2,260

2,370

Blackburn with Darwen

1,840

2,000

2,120

Blackpool

1,690

1,870

1,890

Bolton

1,750

2,000

2,000

2,030

Bournemouth

1,480

1,700

1,820

1,850

Bracknell Forest

1,620

1,880

1,900

Bradford

2,140

2,240

1,980

2,020

Brent

2,030

2,190

2,470

2,510

Brighton and Hove

1,550

1.750

1,850

1,940

Bromley

1,720

1,910

2,010

2,040

Buckinghamshire

1,630

1,700

1,840

1,840

Bury

1,490

1,640

1,780

1,800

Calderdale

1,660

1,860

1,950

1,960

Pre LGR Cambridgeshire

1,580

Cambridgeshire

1,6404

1,810

1,840

Camden

2,390

2,520

2,440

2,750

Pre LGR Cheshire

1,710

Cheshire

1,770

1,780

1,790

City of Bristol

1,810

1,930

2,200

2,270

City of Kingston-Upon-Hull

1,680

1,940

1,980

2,000

City of London

3,810

3,970

4,180

4,510

City of Nottingham

1,950

2,090

2,120

City of Peterborough

1,830

1,590

1,650

City of Plymouth

1,700

1,940

1,960

Cornwall

1,670

1,820

1,900

1,930

Coventry

1,800

1,970

2,190

2,220

Croydon

1,910

2,010

2,130

2,180

Cumbria

1,860

1,880

2,050

2,070

Darlington

1,420

1,570

1,790

1,860

Derby

1,670

1,850

1,940

1,990

Derbyshire

1,580

1,730

1,820

1,840

Pre LGR Devon

1,630

Devon

1,730

1,950

1,980

Doncaster

1,890

1,930

2,070

2,070

Dorset

1,640

1,780

1,870

1,890

Dudley

1,570

1,790

1,980

2,010

Durham

1,690

1,810

2,050

2,100

Ealing

2,020

2,170

2,220

2,310

East Riding of Yorkshire

1,610

1,620

1,790

1,810

East Sussex

1,670

1,800

1,910

1,930

Enfield

1,900

2,040

2,230

2,260

Pre LGR Essex

1,740

Essex

1,950

1,970

1,970

Gateshead

1,700

1,800

1,950

1,970

Gloucestershire

1,640

1,800

1,850

1,960

Greenwich

2,190

2,410

2,590

2,690

Hackney

2,420

2,490

2,740

2,980

Halton

1,870

2,030

2,090

Hammersmith and Fulham

2,520

2,560

2,920

3,050

Hampshire

1,700

1,760

1,960

1,970

Haringey

2,360

2,490

2,460

2,550

Harrow

2,140

2,260

2,320

2,430

Hartlepool

1,500

1,650

1,760

1,780

Havering

1,750

1,840

1,960

1,970

Hereford and Worcester

1,660

Herefordshire

1,780

1,840

1,850

Hertfordshire

1,760

1,880

1,930

1,960

Hillingdon

1,730

1,770

2,100

2,110

Hounslow

2,060

2,240

2,340

2,380

Isle of Wight

1,800

2,000

2,190

2,230

Isles of Scilly

2,560

2,570

2,510

2,520

Islington

2,340

2,330

2,370

2,520

Kensington and Chelsea

2,650

2,750

2,960

3,050

Pre LGR Kent

1,700

Kent

1,860

2,140

2,210

Kingston-upon-Thames

1,830

1,940

2,070

2,110

Kirklees

1,650

1,850

2,020

2,060

Knowsley

1,700

1,870

2,120

2,120

Lambeth

2,810

2,930

2,710

3,020

Pre LGR Lancashire

1,670

Lancashire

1,820

1,950

1,980

Leeds

1,710

1,910

2,100

2,120

Leicester city

1,740

1,910

2,130

2,150

Leicestershire

1,660

1,810

1,930

2,000

Lewisham

2,340

2,510

2,560

2,710

Lincolnshire

1,680

1,740

1,870

1,870

Liverpool

1,660

1,840

1,970

1,980

Luton

1,700

1,830

2,040

2,080

Manchester

1,620

1,740

1,920

1,950

Medway

1,790

1,970

1,930

Merton

2,060

2,160

2,220

2,260

Middlesbrough

1,580

1,620

1,920

1,920

Milton Keynes

1,610

1,770

1,960

2,030

Newcastle-upon-Tyne

1,940

1,960

2,060

2,120

Newham

1,850

2,010

2,200

2,290

Norfolk

1,710

1,730

1,800

1,810

North East Lincolnshire

1,600

1,830

2,060

2,140

North Lincolnshire

1,650

1,710

1,880

1,900

North Somerset

1,690

1,870

1,880

1,890

North Tyneside

1,640

1,800

1,860

1,920

North Yorkshire

1,650

1,750

1,980

1,990

Northamptonshire

1.580

1,720

1,910

1,930

Northumberland

1,620

1,810

1,960

2,000

Pre LGR Nottinghamshire

1,720

Nottinghamshire

1,810

2,010

2,030

0ldham

1,650

1,820

2,040

2,100

0xfordshire

1,630

1,750

1,830

1,870

Poole

1,510

1,600

1,700

1,710

Portsmouth

1,780

1,940

2,170

2,220

Reading

1,670

1,660

1,710

Redbridge

1,810

1,880

2,070

2,080

Redcar and Cleveland

1,630

1,790

2,000

2,010

Richmond-upon-Thames

1,940

2,020

2,110

2,120

Rochdale

1,680

1,770

1,900

1,960

Rotherham

1,580

1,780

2,050

2,080

Rutland

1,890

2,130

2,160

2,190

Salford

1,560

1,630

1,990

2,010

Sandwell

1,850

2,040

2,110

2,120

Sefton

1,590

1,670

1,840

1,850

Sheffield

1,680

1,760

1,960

2,090

Pre LGR Shropshire

1,680

Shropshire

1,830

1,880

1,910

Slough

2,070

2,130

2,340

Solihull

1,630

1,770

1,920

1,930

Somerset

1,700

1,820

1,930

1,950

South Gloucestershire

1,650

1,780

1,900

1,920

South Tyneside

1,560

1,760

1,920

1,950

Southampton

1,830

1,960

2,140

2,160

Southend

1,870

2,040

2,040

Southwark

2,330

2,520

2,730

2,850

St Helens

1,600

1,700

2,000

2,030

Staffordshire

1,580

1,670

1,850

1,860

Stockport

1,570

1,750

1,860

1,890

Stockton-on-Tees

1,450

1,610

1,970

2,000

Stoke

1,600

1,810

1,970

2,030

Suffolk

1,770

1,900

2,000

2,060

Sunderland

1,660

1,830

1,950

2,030

Surrey

1,780

1,910

1,960

2,040

Sutton

1,870

2,030

2,230

2,270

Swindon

1,580

1,620

1,580

1,590

Tameside

1,590

1,720

1,640

1,650

Telford and Wrekin

1,670

1,700

1,770

Thurrock

1,800

2,060

2,070

Torbay

1,680

1,860

1,880

Tower Hamlets

2,600

2,770

3,090

3,140

Trafford

1,580

1,710

1,830

1,840

Wakefield

1,560

1,710

1,890

1,930

Walsall

1,630

1,790

2,030

2,070

Waltham Forest

2,110

2,160

2,430

2,560

Wandsworth

2,210

2,390

2,530

2,700

Warrington

1,740

1,880

1,900

Warwickshire

1,670

1,780

1,910

1,930

West Berkshire

1,760

1,950

1,980

West Sussex

1,730

1,860

1,950

2,020

Westminster

2,590

2,860

2,810

2,900

Wigan

1,520

1,610

1,900

1,920

Wiltshire

1,690

1,740

1,720

1,720

Windsor and Maidenhead

1,860

2,020

2,050

Wirral

1,600

1,810

1,810

1,840

Wokingham

1,650

1,800

1,820

Wolverhampton

1,750

1,870

2,000

2,040

Worcestershire

1,720

1,830

1,840

York

1,600

1,730

1,760

1,800

2000–01 2001–02

Primary education

Pre-primary and primary education

Primary education

Pre-primary and primary education

England

2,210

2,280

2,480

2,570

Barking and Dagenham

2,450

2,490

2,880

2,940

Barnet

2,350

2,390

2,640

2,710

Barnsley

1,980

2,020

2,250

2,350

Bath and NE Somerset

2,180

2,250

2,240

2,380

Bedfordshire

2,260

2,350

2,550

2,700

Berkshire

Bexley

2,070

2,090

2,320

2,350

Birmingham

2,460

2,580

2,730

2,860

Blackburn with Darwen

2,260

2,410

2,560

2,750

Blackpool

2,200

2,210

2,390

2,450

Bolton

2,260

2,290

2,500

2,560

Bournemouth

2,020

2,070

2,270

2,340

Bracknell Forest

2,120

2,120

2,330

2,330

Bradford

2,270

2,340

2,780

2,860

Brent

2,550

2,600

2,910

2,950

Brighton and Hove

2,050

2,210

2,330

2,430

Bromley

2,170

2,220

2,440

2,490

Buckinghamshire

1,800

1,800

1,950

1,960

Bury

2,010

2,040

2,180

2,220

Calderdale

2,160

2,170

2,400

2,410

Pre LGR Cambridgeshire

Cambridgeshire

2,020

2,070

2,280

2,330

Camden

2,650

3,040

3,140

3,690

Pre LGR Cheshire

Cheshire

1,880

1,900

2,060

2,100

City of Bristol

2,380

2,620

2,450

2,720

City of Kingston-Upon-Hull

2,270

2,290

2,760

2,800

City of London

4,520

4,740

4,630

4,630

City of Nottingham

2,260

2,310

2,800

2,860

City of Peterborough

2,220

2,340

2,360

2,420

City of Plymouth

2,150

2,200

2,440

2,510

Cornwall

2,030

2,070

2,270

2,340

Coventry

2,400

2,430

2,770

2,820

Croydon

2,350

2,390

2,780

2,870

Cumbria

2,240

2,270

2,550

2,550

Darlington

1,930

2,010

2,290

2,390

Derby

2,170

2,330

2,610

2,840

Derbyshire

2,020

2,040

2,250

2,290

Pre LGR Devon

Devon

2,060

2,090

2,260

2,300

Doncaster

2,230

2,240

2,520

2,550

Dorset

2,140

2,160

2,350

2,400

Dudley

2,170

2,240

2,420

2,520

Durham

2,290

2,340

2,600

2,660

Ealing

2,370

2,500

2,720

2,890

East Riding of Yorkshire

2,160

2,200

2,300

2,350

East Sussex

2,130

2,170

2,390

2,440

Enfield

2,400

2,470

2,740

2,840

Pre LGR Essex

Essex

2,240

2,250

2,460

2,480

Gateshead

2,220

2,260

2,300

2,410

Gloucestershire

2,170

2,340

2,260

2,510

Greenwich

2,830

2,990

3,210

3,430

Hackney

3,310

3,860

3,160

3,480

Halton

2,110

2,130

2,560

2,630

Hammersmith and Fulham

3,020

3,260

3,220

3,360

Hampshire

2,150

2,160

2,370

2,380

Haringey

2,590

2,780

3,080

3,440

Harrow

2,490

2,540

2,890

2,990

Hartlepool

2,070

2,090

2,550

2,620

Havering

2,200

2,230

2,390

2,430

Hereford and Worcester

Herefordshire

2,130

2,150

2,330

2,390

Hertfordshire

2,100

2,140

2,370

2,410

Hillingdon

2,200

2,220

2,430

2,470

Hounslow

2,470

2,530

2,820

2,880

Isle of Wight

2,480

2,550

2,730

2,830

Isles of Scilly

2,640

2,640

2,970

3,880

Islington

2,720

3,030

3,020

3,280

Kensington and Chelsea

3,270

3,380

3,440

3,600

Pre LGR Kent

Kent

2,220

2,320

2,520

2,670

Kingston-upon-Thames

2,270

2,280

2,630

2,650

Kirklees

2,240

2,340

2,460

2,520

Knowsley

2,300

2,350

2,510

2,580

Lambeth

2,730

2,940

2,730

2,970

Pre LGR Lancashire

Lancashire

2,160

2,220

2,450

2,530

Leeds

2,000

2,040

2,600

2,660

Leicester city

2,390

2,460

2,640

2,730

Leicestershire

2,080

2,160

2,260

2,420

Lewisham

2,680

2,970

3,120

3,370

Lincolnshire

1,990

2,000

2,070

2,090

Liverpool

2,540

2,580

2,770

2,860

Luton

2,590

2,650

2,700

2,800

Manchester

2,250

2,280

2,650

2,680

Medway

2,230

2,240

2,450

2,500

Merton

2,400

2,450

2,690

2,770

Middlesbrough

2,210

2,230

2,540

2,570

Milton Keynes

2,040

2,140

2,450

2,600

Newcastle-upon-Tyne

2,260

2,350

2,570

2,670

Newham

2,460

2,590

2,930

3,090

Norfolk

1,970

2,030

2,350

2,470

North East Lincolnshire

2,330

2,480

2,590

2,740

North Lincolnshire

2,200

2,330

2,540

2,590

North Somerset

2,070

2,090

2,090

2,130

North Tyneside

1,770

1,810

2,240

2,320

North Yorkshire

2,060

2,070

2,350

2,370

Northamptonshire

2,160

2,180

2,340

2,390

Northumberland

2,200

2,260

2,450

2,560

Pre LGR Nottinghamshire

Nottinghamshire

2,220

2,240

2,410

2,430

0ldham

2,090

2,190

2,500

2,630

0xfordshire

2,230

2,280

2,510

2,540

Poole

1,820

1,730

2,060

2,080

Portsmouth

2,260

2,330

2,480

2,580

Reading

1,700

1,750

2,010

2,070

Redbridge

2,280

2,290

2,610

2,660

Redcar and Cleveland

2,090

2,110

2,420

2,470

Richmond-upon-Thames

2,380

2,430

2,690

2,750

Rochdale

2,100

2,270

2,420

2,570

Rotherham

2,360

2,400

2,620

2,700

Rutland

2,260

2,320

2,570

2,680

Salford

2,300

2,380

2,560

2,630

Sandwell

2,190

2,210

2,510

2,540

Sefton

2,050

2,080

2,240

2,290

Sheffield

2,260

2,410

2,500

2,66

Pre LGR Shropshire

Shropshire

1,990

2,020

2,250

2,300

Slough

2,400

2,600

2,560

2,760

Solihull

2,090

2,110

2,250

2,260

Somerset

2,140

2,240

2,360

2,510

South Gloucestershire

2,190

2,200

2,340

2,370

South Tyneside

2,160

2,220

2,580

2,660

Southampton

2,360

2,400

2,570

2,610

Southend

2,220

2,230

2,530

2,560

Southwark

2,980

3,070

3,760

3,810

St Helens

2,190

2,240

2,410

2,470

Staffordshire

2,070

2,110

2,290

2,360

Stockport

2,180

2,230

2,370

2,410

Stockton-on-Tees

2,190

2,250

2,440

2,560

Stoke

2,080

2,150

2,400

2,510

Suffolk

2,220

2,290

2,420

2,560

Sunderland

2,180

2,280

2,470

2,620

Surrey

2,160

2,270

2,380

2,430

Sutton

2,430

2,510

2,640

2,700

Swindon

2,030

2,030

2,000

2,030

Tameside

1,970

2,010

2,420

2,500

Telford and Wrekin

2,060

2,200

2,320

2,440

Thurrock

2,050

2,160

2,540

2,710

Torbay

2,080

2,090

2,260

2,290

Tower Hamlets

3,350

3,400

3,670

3,820

Trafford

2,190

2,220

2,360

2,400

Wakefield

2,100

2,160

2,450

2,490

Walsall

2,200

2,260

2,450

2,560

Waltham Forest

2,480

2,560

3,080

3,140

Wandsworth

2,900

3,100

3,220

3,480

Warrington

1,980

1,990

2,220

2,250

Warwickshire

1,990

2,020

2,190

2,240

West Berkshire

2,210

2,270

2,560

2,650

West Sussex

2,200

2,270

2,360

2,500

Westminster

3,390

3,680

3,780

4,180

Wigan

2,330

2,340

2,480

2,500

Wiltshire

1,920

1,930

2,010

2,020

Windsor and Maidenhead

2,480

2,560

2,600

2,710

Wirral

2,030

2,060

2,400

2,450

Wokingham

1,980

2,010

2,210

2,270

Wolverhampton

2,070

2,120

2,390

2,500

Worcestershire

2,060

2,090

2,320

2,370

York

1,860

1,870

2,180

2,260

2002–03* 2003–04 2004–05

Primary education

Primary education

Primary education

England

2,530

2,750

2,910

Barking and Dagenham

2,760

3,110

3,150

Barnet

2,820

3,050

3,280

Barnsley

2,550

2,680

2,910

Bath and NE Somerset

2,480

2,670

2,850

Bedfordshire

2,540

2,710

2,830

Berkshire

Bexley

2,390

2,630

2,810

Birmingham

2,720

2,940

3,200

Blackburn with Darwen

2,540

2,730

2,910

Blackpool

2,370

2,660

2,880

Bolton

2,410

2,620

2,760

Bournemouth

2,390

2,520

2,670

Bracknell Forest

2,390

2,580

2,730

Bradford

2,770

2,960

3,070

Brent

2,780

3,080

3,230

Brighton and Hove

2,480

2,660

2,820

Bromley

2,400

2,590

2,690

Buckinghamshire

2,350

2,600

2,740

Bury

2,220

2,460

2,660

Calderdale

2,490

2,750

2,940

Pre LGR Cambridgeshire

Cambridgeshire

2,350

2,560

2,720

Camden

3,610

3,950

4,120

Pre LGR Cheshire

Cheshire

2,340

2,540

2,640

City of Bristol

2,510

2,720

2,860

City of Kingston-Upon-Hull

2,670

2,930

2,990

City of London

4,780

5,250

4,990

City of Nottingham

2,930

3,260

3,410

City of Peterborough

2,530

2,740

2,890

City of Plymouth

2,430

2,610

2,800

Cornwall

2,440

2,640

2,810

Coventry

2,630

2,870

3,010

Croydon

2,710

2,890

3,060

Cumbria

2,560

2,740

2,870

Darlington

2,380

2,640

2,710

Derby

2,430

2,730

2,940

Derbyshire

2,350

2,480

2,630

Pre LGR Devon

Devon

2,370

2,620

2,790

Doncaster

2,530

2,720

2,860

Dorset

2,340

2,610

2,790

Dudley

2,310

2,620

2,760

Durham

2,590

2,810

3,000

Ealing

2,830

3,210

3,330

East Riding of Yorkshire

2,430

2,580

2,760

East Sussex

2,460

2,660

2,830

Enfield

2,730

3,090

3,270

Pre LGR Essex

Essex

2,570

2,750

2,900

Gateshead

2,470

2,680

2,850

Gloucestershire

2,310

2,620

2,720

Greenwich

3,080

3,280

3,530

Hackney

3,280

3,810

4,010

Halton

2,580

2,740

2,910

Hammersmith and Fulham

3,260

3,600

3,800

Hampshire

2,480

2,690

2,850

Haringey

3,110

3,440

3,590

Harrow

2,720

2,950

3,100

Hartlepool

2,430

2,660

2,840

Havering

2,490

2,730

2,920

Hereford and Worcester

Herefordshire

2,410

2,600

2,780

Hertfordshire

2,420

2,630

2,780

Hillingdon

2,480

2,710

2,920

Hounslow

2,840

3,060

3,160

Isle of Wight

2,690

2,840

3,000

Isles of Scilly

8,030

6,620

7,280

Islington

3,150

3,590

3,760

Kensington and Chelsea

3,550

3,990

4,160

Pre LGR Kent

Kent

2,400

2,630

2,770

Kingston-upon-Thames

2,600

2,950

3,110

Kirklees

2,580

2,850

3,060

Knowsley

2,620

2,850

3,010

Lambeth

3,520

3,880

4,110

Pre LGR Lancashire

Lancashire

2,520

2,780

2,900

Leeds

2,610

2,840

3,010

Leicester city

2,520

2,760

2,990

Leicestershire

2,190

2,420

2,580

Lewisham

3,230

3,590

3,800

Lincolnshire

2,260

2,450

2,600

Liverpool

2,720

2,970

3,100

Luton

2,660

2,910

3,100

Manchester

2,740

2,930

3,030

Medway

2,560

2,830

3,050

Merton

2,890

3,100

3,200

Middlesbrough

2,530

2,790

2,980

Milton Keynes

2,340

2,630

2,760

Newcastle-upon-Tyne

2,470

2,670

2,840

Newham

2,880

3,270

3,630

Norfolk

2,500

2,660

2,770

North East Lincolnshire

2,570

2,730

2,920

North Lincolnshire

2,480

2,670

2,840

North Somerset

2,270

2,490

2,650

North Tyneside

2,410

2,590

2,760

North Yorkshire

2,470

2,710

2,890

Northamptonshire

2,280

2,600

2,720

Northumberland

2,470

2,720

2,940

Pre LGR Nottinghamshire

Nottinghamshire

2,500

2,740

2,900

0ldham

2,430

2,600

2,740

0xfordshire

2,460

2,690

2,790

Poole

2,430

2,530

2,620

Portsmouth

2,780

2,950

3,070

Reading

2,430

2,640

2,730

Redbridge

2,500

2,700

2,830

Redcar and Cleveland

2,490

2,780

2,940

Richmond-upon-Thames

2,650

2,900

3,030

Rochdale

2,370

2,760

2,910

Rotherham

2,380

2,600

2,820

Rutland

2,540

2,840

2,950

Salford

2,480

2,830

2,920

Sandwell

2,530

2,760

3,010

Sefton

2,530

2,830

2,980

Sheffield

2,430

2,620

2,780

Pre LGR Shropshire

Shropshire

2,330

2,560

2,600

Slough

2,630

2,810

2,990

Solihull

2,260

2,460

2,580

Somerset

2,430

2,610

2,810

South Gloucestershire

2,330

2,460

2,610

South Tyneside

2,540

2,820

2,970

Southampton

2,640

2,940

3,170

Southend

2,590

2,730

2,860

Southwark

3,470

3,660

3,970

St Helens

2,500

2,590

2,790

Staffordshire

2,280

2,490

2,620

Stockport

2,260

2,460

2,720

Stockton-on-Tees

2,430

2,610

2,810

Stoke

2,320

2,640

2,730

Suffolk

2,520

2,740

2,920

Sunderland

2,470

2,660

2,840

Surrey

2,490

2,640

2,790

Sutton

2,470

2,640

2,870

Swindon

2,240

2,440

2,630

Tameside

2,480

2,610

2,750

Telford and Wrekin

2,290

2,430

2,660

Thurrock

2,680

2,810

2,940

Torbay

2,370

2,580

2,730

Tower Hamlets

3,850

4,150

4,300

Trafford

2,250

2,390

2,500

Wakefield

2,480

2,690

2,810

Walsall

2,430

2,610

2,770

Waltham Forest

2,910

3,230

3,390

Wandsworth

3,170

3,470

3,630

Warrington

2,270

2,510

2,630

Warwickshire

2,390

2,560

2,670

West Berkshire

2,500

2,680

2,840

West Sussex

2,430

2,610

2,780

Westminster

3,430

3,620

3,800

Wigan

2,400

2,620

2,780

Wiltshire

2,340

2,550

2,670

Windsor and Maidenhead

2,550

2,710

2,870

Wirral

2,520

2,640

2,730

Wokingham

2,340

2,550

2,650

Wolverhampton

2,430

2,580

2,810

Worcestershire

2,330

2,540

2,740

York

2,390

2,560

2,680

(69) School based expenditure includes only expenditure incurred directly by the schools. This includes the pay of teachers and school-based support staff, school premises costs, books and equipment, and certain other supplies and services, less any capital items funded from recurrent spending and income from sales, fees and charges and rents and rates. This excludes the central cost of support services such as home to school transport, local authority administration and the financing of capital expenditure.

(70) 1999–2000 saw a change in data source when the data collection moved from the RO1 form collected by the 0DPM to the Section 52 form from the DfES. 2002–03 saw a further break in the time series following the introduction of Consistent Financial Reporting (CFR) and the associated restructuring of the outturn tables. The change in sources is shown by an asterisk. In 2002–03 school based expenditure is taken from Section 52 Outturn Table A line 51 net current expenditure (NCE). For 2001–02 and earlier years the expenditure is calculated as lines one to 12 less lines 29, 30, 35 and 37. This differs from the old Net Institutional Expenditure (NIE) calculation only in the treatment of meals and milk which is no longer excluded and no adjustments for balances are now made. This is taken from Section 52 0utturn Table 3 for 1999–2000 to 2001–02 and from the RO1 form previously.

(71) The calculation for 2002–03 onwards is broadly similar to the calculation in previous years. However, 2001–02 and earlier years includes all premature retirement compensation (PRC) and Crombie payments, mandatory PRC payments and other indirect employee expenses. In 2001–02 this accounted for approximately £70 per pupil. From 2002–03 onwards only the schools element of these categories is included and this accounted for approximately £50 per pupil of the 2002–03 total. Also, for some LAs, expenditure that had previously been attributed to the school sectors was reported within the LA part of the form from 2002–03, though this is not quantifiable from existing sources.

(72) Pupil numbers include only those pupils attending maintained establishments within each sector and are drawn from the DfES Annual Schools Census adjusted to be on a financial year basis.

(73) Local government reorganisation (LGR) took place during the mid to late 1990s and those LAs that did not exist either pre or post LGR are represented by '—' for those years.

(74) Spending in 1997–98 reflects the transfer of monies from local government to central Government for the nursery vouchers scheme. These were returned to local government from 1998–99.

(75) The 1999–2000 figures reflect the return of GM schools to local authority maintenance. Consequently LAs where there entire pupil provision were educated in GM schools will show a unit cost of zero prior to 1999–2000.

(76) Expenditure was not distinguished between the pre-primary and primary sectors until the inception of Section 52 for financial year 1999–2000.

Note:

Figures are as reported by the LEA in cash terms and rounded to the nearest 10.

Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills when she will reply to the letter dated 30 November 2005 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton, with regard to Mr. A. Diamond. [41837]

Dedicated Schools Grant

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the purpose is of the Dedicated Schools Grant; how much will be spent on this in each of the next three years; how much will be received by each local authority; and if she will make a statement. [41297]

The data I placed in the Library to accompany my written statement of 7 December 2005 on the School Funding Settlement for 2006–07 and 2007–08, sets out how much Dedicated Schools Grant each authority will receive for those years. Allocations of DSG for 2008–09 will be announced after the comprehensive spending review has been completed, expected to be in summer 2007.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the direct schools grant per pupil is in (a) Shropshire and (b) England; and what assessment she has made of the adequacy of Shropshire local education authority's direct schools grant. [43023]

The following table sets out the guaranteed level of Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) per pupil for Shropshire and England for 2006–07 and 2007–08.

Dedicated Schools Grant per pupil £

2006–07

2007–08

Shropshire

3,338.62

3,550.86

England

3,642.98

3,888.20

The levels in the table represent increases of 6.6 per cent. and 6.4 per cent. per pupil for 2006–07 and 2007–08 respectively. Those increases will allow Shropshire authority to meet the minimum funding guarantee for all its schools, while also allowing it to put substantial resources into the Government priorities of greater personalisation of learning at Key Stage 2 and 3, more practical learning options for 14 to 16-year-old pupils, work force reform in the primary sector and the increased entitlement to early years provision from 33 to 38 weeks. The increases will also provide the authority with headroom to target on local priorities, and will ensure that it has scope to begin to respond to the conclusions of the review of deprivation funding, ensuring that schools in our most deprived communities and areas benefit from sufficient resource to meet the pressures and challenges they face.

Drop-out Rates

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills which 10 (a) further and (b) higher education institutions had the (i) highest and (ii) lowest drop-out rate in the last period for which figures are available. [39920]

For higher education institutions, the latest available information on projected non-completion rates for students starting full-time first degree courses in 2002/03 is shown in the following table. The overall non-completion rate for all English HE institutions was 13.9 per cent., compared to 15.7 per cent. in 1996/97.

Percentage of UK domiciled full-time first degree students expected neither to obtain an award nor transfer 2002/03

Percentage

Highest non-completion rates:

Bolton Institute of Higher Education

31.9

The University of Derby

27.0

The University of Sunderland

26.8

The University of East London

26.0

London South Bank University

25.6

Middlesex University

25.1

Thames Valley University

25.0

The University of Greenwich

25.0

London Metropolitan University

24.7

Liverpool Hope University College

23.6

Lowest non-completion rates:

Birmingham College of Food, Tourism and

Creative Studies

0.0

University of London (institutes and activities)

0.0

The Royal Veterinary College

0.0

The University of Cambridge

1.0

Courtauld Institute of Art

1.3

The University of Oxford

2.3

Royal College of Music

2.7

University of Durham

3.7

Imperial College of Science, Technology and

Medicine

3.7

The University of Bath

3.9

Source:

"Performance Indicators in Higher Education", published by the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). For 2002/03, the projected outcomes summarise the pattern of movements of students at institutions between 2002/03 and 2003/04 and give the outcomes that would have been expected from starters in 2002/03 if progression patterns for the years after 2003/04 were to remain unchanged. The published HESA data show the proportion of entrants who are projected to: obtain a qualification (either a first degree or another undergraduate award); transfer to another HEI; neither obtain a qualification nor transfer (i.e. fail to complete the course).

The Learning and Skills Council does not collect data on drop out rates from FE colleges. Instead they collect data on learner retention rates. The learner retention rate is the proportion of qualification aims for which all learning activities were completed. Retention rates for individual colleges can be downloaded from the LSC website (http://benchmarkingdata.lsc.gov.uk/year8/index.cfm)

The overall learner retention rate for all FE colleges combined was 85 per cent. in 20003/04, the latest year for which final data are available. For the middle 80 per cent. of colleges the retention rate lay in the range 78 per cent. to 91 per cent.

The 10 colleges with the highest retention rates were:

Percentage

Northern College for Residential Adult Education

99

Plater College

97

Fircroft College of Adult Education

97

Ruskin College

97

King Edward VI College, Stourbridge

96

Hills Road Sixth Form College

96

Wyggeston and Queen Elizabeth I College

96

St Dominic's Sixth Form College

96

The Sixth Form College, Farnborough

95

Pershore Group of Colleges

95

The 10 colleges with the lowest retention rates were:

Percentage

Salisbury College

61

Otley College of Agriculture and Horticulture

62

North East Surrey College of Technology

67

Widnes and Runcorn Sixth Form College

69

Newark and Sherwood College

70

Milton Keynes College

72

Leeds College of Music

72

Isle College FE Corporation

72

Thames Valley University

72

Joseph Priestley College

73

Retention rates are highly dependent on the mix of qualifications done at a college. A college that does few short courses and many full courses is likely to get a relatively low retention rate, simply because the national retention rate for short courses is relatively high and the national retention rate for full courses is relatively low.

FE College retention rates and HE institution non-completion rates are collected in different ways and are not comparable.

Dyslexia

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills at what age children can be tested for dyslexia; and what types of test are available. [43917]

There is no set age at which children can or should be tested for dyslexia. Being a spectrum disorder, dyslexia can present a range of characteristics that can vary considerably from person to person. It is therefore uncertain that universal screening to test for dyslexia, particularly in the early years, would prove sufficiently discriminating to pick out those children most at risk of persisting difficulties.

Schools and local authorities must have regard to the SEN code of practice, which gives practical advice on carrying out statutory duties to identify, assess and make suitable provision for children with SEN, including with dyslexia. The precise arrangements for any screening or assessment are, however, for local determination.

Through our primary national strategy, we have issued guidance for teachers, which has a specific focus on dyslexia. Professional development materials, "Learning and teaching for children with dyslexia", include a checklist of early indicators for potential dyslexia. "Playing with sounds", deals with the early teaching of phonics and includes guidance on early identification and support for children who demonstrate the phonological difficulties often associated with dyslexia.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many children who were removed or excluded from their school because of behavioural problems were (a) dyslexic and (b) subsequently diagnosed as dyslexic in the last 12 months for which figures are available; and if she will make a statement. [43918]

The requested information is not collected centrally. However the number of pupils permanently excluded with all types of special educational needs is shown in the table.

Maintained primary, secondary and all special schools —number of permanent exclusions by special educational needs (SEN)—England, 2003/04 (Estimates) (77)(78)(79)

Permanent exclusions Fixed period exclusions

Number of exclusions

Percentage of exclusions(80)

Percentage of school population(81)

Number of exclusions

Percentage of exclusions(80)

Percentage of school population(81)

Pupils with statements of SEN

1,040

11

0.44

39,790

12

17.1

Pupils with SEN without statements

5,240

53

0.46

133,290

39

11.7

Pupils with no SEN

3,600

36

0.06

171,420

50

2.7

All pupils(82)

9,880

100

0.13

344,510

100

4.5

(77) Includes middle schools as deemed.

(78) For permanent exclusions includes both maintained and non-maintained special schools. For fixed period exclusions excludes non-maintained special schools.

(79) Figures relating to permanent exclusions are estimates based on incomplete pupil level data.

(80) The number of exclusions expressed as a percentage of the total number of exclusions.

(81) The number of exclusions by stage of SEN expressed as a percentage of the total number of pupils with same stage of SEN. Excludes dually registered pupils.

(82) There was one permanent exclusion and 12 fixed period exclusions for which stage of SEN was not known—these were included in total for 'all pupils' only.

Source:

Annual Schools Census and Termly Exclusions Survey

Education Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what her latest estimate is of the average total cost of Government education spending between the ages of 0 and 21 for a child from (a) the highest and (b) the lowest (i) income decile and (ii) socioeconomic class; and if she will make a statement. [41446]

Estimates are not available on the average total cost of Government education spending between the ages of 0 and 21 by each parental income decile and each socioeconomic class.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what her latest estimate is of per capita public spending on education for each age cohort in England from age three to age 21 years; and if she will make a statement. [41456]

Data on education spending is not collated by age or cohort. The latest and nearest available estimates relate to annual unit funding in each education sector—schools, FE and HE—published in the DfES' Departmental Report for 2005 (Cm 6522). The following table provides estimates of planned unit funding in 2005–06 per school pupil and full-time equivalent (FTE) students in further and higher education: figures in cash terms rounded to nearest £10.

Planned funding per school pupil and FTE student in FE and HE, 2005–06

£

2005–06

Funding per school pupil (ages three to 19)

4,250(83)

Assumed(84) funding per FTE student in FE for participation (excluding capital costs)

4,840(85)

Funding per planned FTE student in HE

4,610(86)

(83) Figure does not include capital and PFI funding. Estimate consistent with Education Standard Spending/Education Funding Formula Spending plus all schools-related revenue grants. Pension transfers are included. Based on FTEs aged three to 19 in maintained schools in England, including three-year-olds funded through state support in maintained and other educational establishments.

(84) This is an assumed estimate as it is based on assumptions about how much of the total amount of money going to the Learning and Skills Council is spent on further education.

(85) Figure relates to all FE spending, including for adult participants. Full-time equivalent (FTE) students funded by the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) in either further education sector colleges or in external institutions, specialist designated institutions, dance and drama institutions and higher education institutions.

(86) Funding relates to all DfES revenue grants to support HE in HE institutions and FE colleges in England and excludes expenditure on tuition fees and student maintenance costs. Figure based on planned.

Indoor Airborne Chemicals

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what plans she has to issue guidelines to schools on acceptable (a) levels and (b) maximum concentrations of indoor airborne chemicals for children aged 4 to 11 years. [43192]

DfES will shortly be issuing a new Building Bulletin 101, "Ventilation of School Buildings", see www.teachernet.gov.uk/iaq. This document will give the standards on ventilation for new school buildings for compliance with Approved Document F on Ventilation of the Building Regulations. Its performance standards are based on maximum concentrations of a number of pollutants including relative humidity, carbon monoxide, total volatile organic compounds, nitrogen dioxide and ozone and relate these back to a maximum carbon dioxide concentration and minimum ventilation rate. The new standards will come into force on 1 April 2006 at the same time as the new Approved Document F of the Building Regulations. The new standards are broadly in line with the requirements for minimum ventilation rates for all schools which are laid down in the Education (School Premises) Regulations SI No.2 1999, (http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/si/si1999/19990002.htm)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what steps she is taking to educate primary school teachers about the possible risks of indoor airborne chemicals. [43193]

"Qualifying to teach" sets out the professional standards for qualified teachers. All primary teachers are trained to teach science. The standards include planning and delivering lessons that are safe (Standard 3.1.3 and 3.3.8) and working within the legal and other frameworks that apply to teachers (Standard 1.8). These frameworks include health and safety legislation and advice.

Parenting Fund

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what (a) public, (b) private and (c) voluntary sector organisations have received payments from the Parenting Fund in each year for which figures are available; and how much each sector received. [43950]

The Parenting Fund was established to support voluntary and community organisations in supporting parents and families. The fund is administered by the National Family and Parenting Institute which has contracted with PricewaterhouseCoopers to ensure the efficient and effective administration of the fund. The contract with PwC was worth £520,000 for the period 2004 to 2006. The remainder of the Parenting Fund has been allocated wholly to voluntary sector organisations. A list of the organisations benefiting from the fund in the period 2004 to 2006 is as follows:

ADAPT

Advisory Centre for Education

African Community Partnership

African Families Support Services

After Adoption

Alcohol Concern

Allens Croft Project

aMAZE

Ask

Asperger Norfolk

Barnardos

Beyond the Horizon (Spurgeon's Child Care)

Blackburn with Darwen Education Development Trust

British Red Cross Family Support Centre

Broadreach House

Camden Women's Aid

Centre for African Development

Child Action Northwest

Children North East

Children's Legal Centre

Chinese Health Information Centre

Chrysalis Manchester

Contact a Family

ContinYou

Coram Family

Croydon Welcare

Deaf Education through Listening and Talking

Disabled Parents Network

Donor Conception Network

East Lancashire Deaf Society

Families at Bowthorpe

Family Group Conference Service

Family Matters Institute (FMI)

Family Rights Group

Family Welfare Association (FWA)

Fathers Direct

FPA (Family Planning Association)

FSU

FSU Liverpool

FSU Manchester

Great Yarmouth Community Trust

Greenwich Women's Centre

Groundwork Thames Valley

Hartcliffe and Withywood Ventures

Henshaw's Society for Blind People

Home-Start

Home-Start Croydon

Home-Start Leeds

Home-Start Leicester

Home-Start Teeside

Home-Start West Cornwall

I CAN

James Wolfe Parents' Association (JWPA)

KIDS Yorkshire and the Humber

Lancashire Council of Mosques

Leeds Animation Workshop

Leeway Woman's Aid

Leicestershire Centre for Integrated Living

Life Education Centres West Midlands

Liverpool ADHD Project

Mencap

Mind in Croydon

NACRO

National Association of Child Contact Centres

National Children's Bureau

National Council of One Parent Families

National Family and Parenting Institute

National Library for the Blind

National Youth Advocacy Service

NCH

NCVCCO

Newcastle upon Tyne YMCA

Norfolk and Norwich Families' House

Nottingham Regional Society for Autism

One Parent Families

One Plus One

PACE

Parentalk

Parenting Education and Support Forum (Parenting UK)

Parentline Plus

Peers Early Education Partnership (PEEP)

Positive Parenting Publications and Programmes

Positive Steps

Post-Adoption Centre

Promoting Effective Parenting

Rainer—Slough Youth Support Service

Refugee Action

REU

Sargent Cancer Care for Children

Scope

Single Parent Action Network

SOVA

Speke Garston Domestic Violence Project

Stepping Stones

Sure Start Burton

The Anaphylaxis Campaign

The Asian Health Agency

The Children's Society

The Family Centre

The Family Nurturing Network

The Fostering Network

The Laura Centre

The National Childbirth Trust

The National Deaf Children's Society

The National Pyramid Trust

The nia project

The Parenting Education and Support Forum

The Place2Be

The Women's Centre for Blackburn and District

Trust for the Study of Adolescence

Turning Point

Turning Point Women's Centre Ltd.

Twins and Multiple Births Association

Winston's Wish—for bereaved children

YMCA England

Yorkshire Band of Hope Union (YBHU)

Young Minds

Youth Access

YWCA Bristol Young Women's Centre

YWCA England and Wales

2005 to 2007; The Policy Research Bureau in association with the Tavistock Institute will receive £600,000 to conduct an evaluation of the Parenting Fund and the Fundholder model.

Pupil Funding

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the (a) mean, (b) median and (c) mode annual funding per pupil is for each local education authority in 2005–06; and if she will make a statement. [43915]

The data for mean and median values for Dedicated Schools Grant per pupil across all local authorities are set out in the following table for 2006–07 and 2007–08. There is no modal value for DSG per pupil in either of those years, since each authority has a unique value of DSG per pupil.

£

2006–07

2007–08

Mean DSG per pupil

3,642.98

3,888.20

Median DSG per pupil

3,578.40

3,822.00

Schools White Paper

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what assessment she has made of the (a) workload and (b) time commitments for (i) governors and (ii) chairs of governing bodies of trust schools under the proposals in the Schools White Paper. [37667]

On average, governors will spend 6 to 8 hours per month on governing body business and chairs of governors will spend at least twice as much time. We would expect a similar commitment in future Trust schools.

Science Graduates

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many students graduated in the academic year 2004/05 in (a) pure chemistry, (b) pure physics, (c) electrical engineering, (d) mechanical engineering and (e) avionics; and how many graduated in each subject (i) five, (ii) 10 and (iii) 20 years ago. [27212]

The latest available information is given in the table. Data for 20 years ago is not available at this level of detail.

First degree qualifiers from English HE institutions

Subject

1994/95

1999/2000

2004/05(91)(92)

Medicine and dentistry

4,190

4,570

5,855

Subjects allied to medicine

8,515

13,300

20,295

Biological sciences

9,590

14,680

21,900

Veterinary sciences

300

390

505

Agricultural and related sciences

1,380

1,790

1,795

Physical sciences

11,215

10,840

10,185

Of which:

Chemistry

3,395

2,835

2,260

Physics

2,090

1,935

1,925

Mathematical sciences

3,380

3,500

4,375

Computing sciences

7,055

9,655

17,170

Engineering and Technology

18,245

16,990

15,730

of which:

Electrical Engineering (up to 2001/02)

815

795

n/a

Electronic and Electrical Engineering (2002/03 onwards)

n/a

n/a

4,545

Mechanical Engineering

2,815

2,945

2,650

Aeronautical Engineering (up to 2001/ 02)

615

710

n/a

Aerospace Engineering (2002/03 onwards)

n/a

n/a

1,050

Architecture, building and planning

6,715

4,965

4,945

Total non-science subjects

125,605

137,325

148,265

Total all subjects

196,195

217,995

251,045

n/a = not applicable

(91) In 2002/03 a new coding frame for subject of study was introduced, as was a new method of allocating students between subjects studied. As such, figures for 2002/03 onwards are not directly comparable to earlier years.

2 Figures for 2004/05 include students qualifying from dormant modes of study. In 2004/05 there were just under 10,000 first degree students who qualified from dormant modes of study.

Figures have been rounded to the nearest 5.

Source:

Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) student record

Special Educational Needs

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of pupils permanently excluded from school had special educational needs in the last year for which figures are available. [42478]

holding answer 17 January 2006

The information requested is shown in the table.

Maintained primary, secondary and all special schools: Number of permanent exclusions by special educational needs (SEN)—2003/04 (estimates)—England(92)(93)(94)

Permanent exclusions

Number of exclusions

Percentage of permanent exclusions(95)

Percentage of school population(96)

Pupils with statements of SEN

1,040

11

0.44

Pupils without statements of SEN

8,840

89

0.12

Of which:

SEN pupils without statements

5,240

53

0.46

Pupils with no SEN

3,600

36

0.06

All pupils(97)

9,880

100

0.13

(92) Includes middle schools as deemed.

(93) Includes both maintained and non-maintained special schools.

(94) Figures relating to permanent exclusions are estimates based on incomplete pupil-level data.

(95) The number of permanent exclusions expressed as a percentage of the total number of permanent exclusions.

(96) The number of excluded pupils by SEN stage expressed as a percentage of all pupils with the same SEN stage in primary, secondary and all special schools (excludes dually registered pupils) in January.

(97) There was one permanent exclusion for which stage of SEN was not known—this is included in total for 'all pupils' only.

Note:

Totals may not appear to equal the sum of component parts because numbers have been rounded to the nearest 10.

Source:

Annual Schools' Census

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much was spent as a proportion of total budget by each local education authority in Greater London on special needs education in each of the last seven years. [43453]

The available information is contained within the following table. Similar data are not available before 2000–01.

Local authority name

2000–01

2001–02

2002–03

2003–04

2004–05

2005–06

Barking and Dagenham

14

13

13

14

15

15

Barnet

11

16

14

15

17

15

Bexley

9

14

12

14

14

15

Brent

16

14

15

15

15

15

Bromley

17

17

16

16

17

23

Camden

12

11

12

12

14

14

City of London

12

11

12

14

15

14

Croydon

15

13

10

11

11

12

Ealing

18

17

16

16

18

17

Enfield

12

12

11

16

15

14

Greenwich

15

15

13

14

15

14

Hackney

16

15

13

14

15

15

Hammersmith and Fulham

18

17

17

16

20

19

Haringey

11

10

11

13

13

16

Harrow

10

6

11

11

12

12

Havering

18

17

16

17

17

17

Hillingdon

13

14

14

16

15

14

Hounslow

12

13

12

12

14

13

Islington

13

12

11

15

13

15

Kensington and Chelsea

13

13

12

14

13

14

Kingston upon Thames

15

14

14

13

14

13

Lambeth

13

13

12

13

13

13

Lewisham

12

13

15

15

17

16

London

17

14

12

14

16

16

Merton

9

9

8

8

8

8

Newham

14

14

14

14

14

13

Redbridge

13

13

13

15

14

15

Richmond upon Thames

14

14

15

14

15

14

Southwark

17

16

16

16

16

17

Sutton

13

13

13

14

14

16

Tower Hamlets

10

10

10

11

12

11

Waltham Forest

11

14

12

14

15

14

Wandsworth

14

14

15

15

16

16

Westminster

12

12

14

12

13

14

Notes:

1. 2000–01 saw a change in data source when the data collection moved from the RA form collected by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister to the section 52 form from the DfES. Therefore data are only available in a comparable format from 2000–01 onwards.

2. The ISB for special schools will include some general education costs for pupils with SEN in addition to those costs specifically for SEN while the figures recorded against "notional SEN" are only indicative of the amount that might by spent by schools on SEN and, from 2004–05 onwards, "notional SEN" delegated to nursery schools was reported on section 52 for the first time and this accounts for £2.7 million and £3.3 million of the 2004–05 and 2005–06 London totals respectively. In 2005–06, local authorities in London also budgeted £90 million for SEN transport expenditure but this is not included in the above table as figures are not available prior to 2005–06.

3. Includes planned expenditure on the provision for pupils with statements and the provision for non-statemented pupils with SEN, support for inclusion, inter authority recoupment, fees for pupils at independent special schools and abroad, educational psychology service, local authority functions in relation to child protection, therapies and other health related services, parent partnership, guidance and information, the monitoring of SEN provision and inclusion administration, assessment and co-ordination. Also included is the funding delegated to primary and secondary schools identified as "notional SEN" and the individual schools budget (ISB) for special schools.

State Schools

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what percentage of pupils of (a) primary school and (b) secondary school age in the Bristol local education authority area are educated within the state school system. [42977]

The requested information is given in the following table.

All schools: full-time equivalent number of pupils by age group. , as at January 2005, Bristol local education authority area(98)(99)

Pupils aged(98)

Five to 10

11 to 15

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

Maintained nursery

17

0.1

0

0.0

Maintained primary

24,076

92.2

18

0.1

Maintained secondary

0

0.0

15,107

72.6

Maintained special

208

0.8

382

1.8

Pupil referral units(100)

5

0.0

91

0.4

Total maintained schools

24,306

93.1

15,597

74.9

Independent

1,806

6.9

4,313

20.7

City technology colleges and academies

0

0.0

906

4.4

Non-maintained special

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Total other school types

1,806

6.9

5,219

25.1

Total all schools

26,112

100.0

20,816

100.0

n/a = not applicable, no schools of this type.

(98) Age as at 31 August 2004.

(99) Excludes dually registered pupils.

(100) Includes pupils with other providers.

Source:

Annual Schools Census