Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 445: debated on Thursday 20 April 2006

Written Answers to Questions

Thursday 20 April 2005

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Energy Efficiency

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what discussions she has had with the Deputy Prime Minister on improving the energy efficiency of households; and if she will make a statement. [63740]

I and my ministerial colleagues have had a number of discussions with the Deputy Prime Minister and his ministerial team on the energy efficiency of households and other related issues.

Single Farm Payments

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the oral answer from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of 9 March 2006, Official Report, column 941, on single farm payments, when the Parliamentary Under-Secretary became aware that it would not be possible to make the bulk of payments by the end of March. [63741]

I and fellow Ministers were made aware of this on 14 March, which as the hon. Member will be aware led to the removal of the RPA Chief Executive on the 16 March and the appointment of Mark Addison as Acting Chief Executive.

Climate Change

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on her plans for meeting the target for carbon dioxide reduction by 2010. [63742]

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on the Government's UK carbon dioxide targets. [63746]

The Government published the 2006 climate change programme on 28 March. The policies and measures in the programme are expected to reduce UK carbon dioxide emissions by 15 to 18 per cent. by 2010 compared with 1990 levels.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on the climate change review. [63737]

A new climate change programme was published on 28 March. It will advance progress to tackle climate change domestically and to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions.

Flood Defences

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on the provision of flood defences for Lewes. [63744]

Following the floods in 2000, the Environment Agency has completed a flood risk management strategy for the Sussex Ouse and £1.8 million has been spent on reducing flood risk in the Mailing area of Lewes. The Environment Agency Regional Flood Defence Committee is planning further works between the Phoenix Causeway and Cliffe Bridge and in the Cliffe cell.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on the security of flood prevention in and around the Thames Estuary. [63747]

London and the Thames Estuary have one of the best tidal defence systems in the world, which provides a high standard of protection from flooding.

The Environment Agency is currently developing a major flood risk management strategy—Thames Estuary 2100—to look at how we can manage flood risk to London over the next 100 years, taking into account future predicted impacts of climate change.

Water Efficiency

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps she is taking to encourage greater water efficiency in the home. [63748]

We have established the new Water Saving Group with key water stakeholders, which has agreed and is making progress on a comprehensive action plan; we are going to consult in summer on regulatory changes to secure improved water efficiency in new housing; and all stakeholders are seeking to educate customers to act responsibly in the use of water.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how her Department plans to improve water efficiency in housing growth areas. [63743]

We announced on 28 March that we will consult on proposals to mandate minimum standards of water efficiency in new housing, which will include new housing development in the four growth areas.

Milk Prices

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the average farmgate price for milk was in 2005 and 1997. [63749]

The average farmgate price for milk delivered in 1997 was 21.96 pence per litre, while in 2005, it was 18.46 pence per litre.

Recycling and Waste

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on the performance of local councils in meeting their recycling and waste targets. [63750]

Levels of recycling by local authorities have improved dramatically from the appalling record under the previous Conservative Government. In 1997 only 8 per cent. of household waste was recycled. This year we expect local authorities will achieve the target we set them of 25 per cent.—a more than trebling of recycling since Labour come to power.

Farm Incomes

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the average level of farm income was in (a) 1997 and (b) 2005. [63751]

UK Total Income from Farming per full-time person equivalent was £12,500 in 2005 compared to £14,600 in 1997 (when expressed in real terms at 2005 prices).

CFC Recovery

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

(1) how many licensed CFC recovery sites are still operational in the UK; and how many of these achieve greater than 300g of CFC recovery per domestic refrigerator or freezer; [63850]

(2) what the average CFC recovery level was per domestic refrigerator or freezer for each year since 2002. [63851]

holding answer 18 April 2006

A number of facilities hold Waste Management Licences for the treatment of waste refrigerators. Not all licensed facilities are operational. Typically, there are a dozen specialist facilities recovering CFCs from domestic refrigerators. Some facilities also treat panels from commercial refrigeration equipment.

Operators of fridge treatment plants are not required to report CFC recovery on a grammes per fridge basis. CFC recovery data for 2005 is currently being assessed and collated and will be available to report to the European Commission by the reporting deadline of 30 June this year.

A detailed audit of fridge treatment facilities in 2004 concluded that the quantity of controlled substances recovered from the refrigerant and blowing agent equated to approximately 236g per fridge/freezer treated in England and Wales during 2003.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment she has made of the UK's position in European CFC recovery league tables. [63852]

holding answer 18 April 2006

Recovery of CFCs/HCFCs (chlorofluorocarbons/hydrochlorofluorocarbons) in the UK in 2004 (the last year for which figures are available) represented some 25 per cent. of the total CFC/HCFCs estimated to have been recovered in the EU. The UK figure also includes CFC/HCFCs recovered from imported waste refrigerators from elsewhere in the EU.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

(1) how many tonnes of the CFCs recovered by the UK's licensed facilities have been (a) destroyed and (b) processed to render them harmless to the environment in each year since 2002; [63845]

(2) what amount of CFC was recovered from domestic and commercial appliances in each of the last 10 years; and what estimate she has made for 2006; [63846]

(3) how many tonnes of CFC were recovered in 2005; what estimate she has made of the amount which will be recovered in 2006; and if she will make a statement; [63848]

(4) what plans she has to address falling levels of CFC recovery in the UK. [63849]

holding answer 18 April 2006

The following information is available on the recovery of chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) from all equipment:

Tonnes

2002

387

2003

494

2004

427

The requirement to recover CFCs and other ozone depleting substances from domestic refrigerators did not come into force until 2002. Recovery levels were not reported or collated for any previous year. CFC recovery data for 2005 is currently being assessed and collated. This will be available in time to meet the European Commission's reporting deadline of 30 June.

It is not possible to know in advance the levels of CFC recovery from domestic or commercial refrigeration equipment in 2006. The amount available for recovery will be influenced by the number of fridges and freezers presented for treatment, the proportion that contained CFCs when manufactured, and the proportion of CFCs lost in use, storage or transit. Recovery figures for 2006 will be reported during 2007.

CFCs recovered at fridge treatment plants are converted/destroyed on site or sent to specialist facilities for destruction.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what guidance her Department has issued on the recovery of controlled substances in refrigerators and freezers; what assessment she has made of the impact of the guidance on CFC recovery rates in the UK; and if she will make a statement. [63847]

The Environment Agency and Scottish Environment Protection Agency "Guidance on the Recovery and Disposal of Controlled Substances Contained in Refrigerators and Freezers" was published in 2002. The Agencies intend to review this guidance when the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive is implemented.

The publication of guidance is only one factor which may influence the amount of CFCs recovered in the UK. Other major factors include the number of fridges and freezers presented for treatment, the proportion that contained CFCs when manufactured, and the proportion of CFCs that are lost in use, storage or transit.

Genetically Modified Foods

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent representations she has received on the cultivation of genetically modified foods; and if she will make a statement. [63624]

Over recent weeks Defra has received representations on various issues to do with GM crops. These include the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops, the ongoing WTO case on GMOs, and the use of Genetic Use Restriction Technologies (GURTs).

Scout Moor Windfarm

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment she has made of whether the development of the Scout Moor windfarm will meet the provisions of the Commons Bill in respect of the protection of and public access to common land. [63419]

These applications are made under section 147 of the Inclosure Act 1845. Consideration is given under these provision to the effect of the exchange on the general public's legal right of access over the land. The future provisions in the Commons Bill are not relevant.

Water Industry Act

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on the operation of section 76 of the Water Industry Act 1991. [64215]

Section 76 of the Water Industry Act 1991, allows water companies to ban or restrict the use of hosepipes to water private gardens or wash private motor cars. Powers can be used if a company believes there is a serious risk to the amount of water available for distribution to customers.

A water company imposing a ban or restriction has to give public notice before it comes into force, including details of when it will take effect. Anyone who contravenes a ban or restriction could be fined.

Water Leakage Rates

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what action has been taken to reduce leakage rates from water pipes in (a) Southend, (b) Essex, (c) the Three Valleys water area and (d) Hertfordshire. [64214]

Water companies are under a duty to develop and maintain efficient and economical water supply systems. Ofwat assesses their performance against leakage targets and reports progress each year.

The areas that you asked about are covered by three different water companies. In 2004–05, Essex and Suffolk Water, which cover areas(a) and (b) met their leakage target and operated below their Economic Level of Leakage (ELL), which is the level of leakage at which it would cost more to make further reductions than to produce water from another source. Three Valleys Water, which covers area (c) and part of area (d) , met their leakage target and operated at their ELL. Thames Water, which covers part of area (d) , reduced its overall leakage for the first time since 1999–2000, but failed its leakage target of 905 Megalitres/day by 10 Megalitres/day (1.1 per cent.).

It is the responsibility of Ofwat to set and enforce leakage targets. If necessary, Ofwat now has powers to fine companies for leakage failures.

Treasury

Correspondence

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer

(1) when he will reply to the letter dated 14 February from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton, with regard to Julie Reid; [62435]

(2) when he expects to answer the letter of 14 February from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton, with regard to Mrs. C Hayes. [63930]

QinetiQ

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what reasons underlay the decision by his Department not to adjust the estimated profile of repayments, when the revenue expected from the QinetiQ loan, as referred to in the National Audit Office Audit of Assumptions for Budget 2006, pages five and six, was not received in 2004–05. [63627]

The estimated profile of repayments on the Aquila Chertsey Loan Note was based on routine data supplied to HM Treasury. For the pre-Budget report 2005 this reflected the slippage out of 2004–05. HMT did not adjust the later years of the profile until MOD were able to confirm the repayments in 2005–06. This was done for Budget 2006.

Transport

Cycling

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many local authorities have included targets for cycling in their local transport plans; and what the targets are for each such authority. [63658]

The final second round Local Transport Plans, covering the years 2006–11, were received by the Department on 31 March and the process of assessment has only just commenced. Once this process has been completed, I will write to the hon. Member.

Dartford Crossing

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the income from user-charges for the Dartford crossing has been in each of the last five years; and how the surplus after operating costs have been deducted was spent. [64191]

Prior to 1 April 2002 the concessionaire operating the Dartford-Thurrock River Crossing retained all toll income.

Gross toll income received at the crossing for the year to 31 March 2003 amounted to £69.34 million. Under the provisions of the legislation applying to toll income at that time (the Dartford-Thurrock Crossing Act 1988) all revenue had to be used for the operation and maintenance of the crossing.

Under the provisions of the Transport Act 2000 a road user-charging scheme has been in operation at the crossing since 1 April 2003. The gross income received is as follows:

£ million

2003–04

68.12(1)

2004–05

69.02(1)

(1) Includes rental income and/or interest received.

The accounts for the period from 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006 are being prepared and will be published in due course.

Under the Transport Act 2000, during the 10 year period which started when the scheme came into force, net proceeds may only be used for the purpose of directly or indirectly facilitating the achievement of any policies or proposals relating to transport. All net revenue from the charging scheme therefore accrues to the Department for Transport to support overall expenditure on transport projects.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of (a) the number of accidents and (b) the congestion caused by vehicles queuing to pass through the toll booths at the Dartford Crossing. [64192]

The agents managing the day-to-day operations of the crossing review injury accident data obtained from the police, every six months and submit a report to the Highways Agency. From this report accident cluster sites are identified and studies commissioned to identify possible mitigating actions.

The layout of the toll plaza is not designed for free flow conditions, and the toll plazas perform an important safety role in controlling the volume of traffic and speed of vehicles both through the tunnels and away from the bridge.

The level of congestion at and around the Dartford Crossing is included in the baseline assessment of the Department for Transport's PSA reliability target.

Rail Services (Wales)

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many representations his Department has received on the First Great Western Trains December 2006 proposed timetable; and how many related to the proposed termination of the 1515 London Paddington to Swansea service at Cardiff. [60811]

The Department has received approximately 600 representations on the First Greater Western's proposed timetable for December 2006. One was related to the proposed termination of the 15.15 Paddington to Swansea service at Cardiff.

Wales

Departmental Staff

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many and what proportion of (a) staff and (b) new staff employed in his Department in each of the last three years for which data are available were registered as disabled. [61388]

The Wales Office has a small number of staff with disabilities. For privacy reason the numbers are confidential, in line with guidance issued by the Cabinet Office which states that Departments are not required to provide figures on the number of disabled staff where it is less than five in the department.

Grievance Procedures

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales

(1) how many grievance procedures have been initiated in his Department in each of the last three years; [63558]

(2) how many complaints of (a) bullying and (b) sexual harassment have been investigated in his Department in each of the last three years; and how many complaints have been upheld. [63559]

Culture, Media and Sport

Cricket

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what support her Department is providing for cricket in 2006–07; and if she will make a statement. [64522]

The Government, through Sport England, continue to provide financial support to the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) to assist in the delivery of both the professional and amateur game.

Cricket is one of Sport England's 10 priority sports and they will be investing £8.5 million during 2006–07. Around £4 million will be provided directly to the ECB to support a number of initiatives including the ECB's four year strategic plan, PE School Sport and Club Links (PESSCL) strategy, Step Into Sport volunteer programme, UK Coaching Certificate programme and the hire of English Institute of Sport facilities. The remaining funding will be provided direct to the sport through schemes such as the Community Club Development Programme, Chance to Shine Programme, County Sports Partnership Funding and Community Funding, and through the National Sports Foundation.

Football (Homophobia)

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what discussions she has had with football (a) authorities and (b) clubs on tackling homophobia. [64619]

There has been no ministerial discussion with either the football authorities or clubs on tackling homophobia in football.

The Government believe that there is no place for homophobia in football or in wider society and we fully support the campaign being led by the Football Association against homophobic abuse in football in England.

Through their "Football For All" programme, the FA is publicly committed to making football inclusive and open to all and to eradicate homophobia in the sport through education, effective reporting structures and communication and awareness training.

Olympic Games

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what funding the Olympic Trust Fund will receive from (a) the Exchequer, (b) the National Lottery and (c) private sources; and if she will make a statement. [62943]

The Government and the Lottery distributors have initially made £35 million available to establish the trust. We will be looking, over time, to attract significant funding from the private sector to support the trust's projects.

Health

Dentistry

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she plans to make of the provision of national health service dentistry in areas where large numbers of dentists have not signed the new NHS dental contract; and if she will make a statement. [63567]

As of 1 April, primary care trusts (PCTs) have devolved responsibility and funding for the commissioning of primary dental services. This means that, if a dentist ceases to provide national health service dentistry, the resources will remain with the PCT to be re-invested in local dental services.

The dental reforms will give PCTs greater flexibility to develop services in ways that reflect the needs of their local populations.

The national implementation group that has been established to monitor the impact of the reforms will be able to review the experience of PCTs in re-commissioning services where it is necessary to do so.

Dorset and Somerset Strategic Health Authority

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much funding was allocated to Dorset and Somerset strategic health authority in each year since 2001. [64305]

The information in the following tables shows the funding allocation for health authorities and primary care trusts (PCTs) since 2001. From 2003, funding allocation was made to individual PCTs.

Revenue allocations to HAs in Dorset and Somerset strategic health authority 2001–02 and 2002–03 -- £000

2001–02

2002–03

Dorset health authority

526,399

582,186

Somerset health authority

344,794

379,361

Dorset and Somerset SHA

871,193

961,547

Revenue allocations to PCTs in Dorset and Somerset SHA from 2003–04 to 2007–08 -- £000

2003–04

2004–05

2005–06

2006–07

2007–08

Bournemouth Teaching

150,577

164,922

180,054

212,879

231,530

Mendip

83,263

91,525

100,068

121,820

135,946

North Dorset

75,209

81,940

88,946

106,648

116,559

Poole

147,167

160,339

174,048

206,103

223,879

Somerset Coast

116,393

127,991

140,301

175,041

195,512

South and East Dorset

132,472

144,375

156,956

188,073

205,872

South Somerset

124,979

136,164

147,807

176,117

192,456

South West Dorset

122,640

134,315

146,636

173,083

190,469

Taunton Deane

86,195

94,443

103,125

125,141

137,943

Dorset and Somerset SHA

1,038,896

1,136,014

1,237,940

1,484,905

1,630,168

General Practitioners

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) general practitioners and (b) NHS dentists there were per head of population in (i) England and (ii) Taunton constituency in each year since 1997. [64308]

Population data at constituency level is not available. The numbers of general medical practitioners (excluding retainers and registrars) and dentists per 100,000 population have been provided for England and Taunton Deane Primary Care Trust (PCT) are shown as follows.

General medical practitioners (excluding retainers and registrars) per 100,000 population in England and the specified organisations, 1997–2004(2)

England

Taunton Deane PCT

1997

57.6

1998

57.9

1999

58.1

2000

58.1

2001

58.2

95.5

2002

58.8

71.2

2003

60.9

71.4

2004

62.9

73.6

2005

(2) General Medical Practitioners (excluding retainers and registrars) includes contracted general practitioners, GMS others and PMS others. Prior to September 2004 this group included GMS unrestricted principals, PMS contracted GPs, PMS salaried GPs, restricted principals, assistants, salaried doctors (Para 52 SFA), PMS other, flexible career scheme GPs and GP returners.

Source:

The Information Centre for Health and Social Care General and Personal Medical Services Statistics Office for National Statistics 2001 Population Census

General dental services and personal dental services: Number of dentists per 100,000 population in England and the specified organisations as at 30 September 1997–2005

England

Taunton Deane PCT

1997

34.3

1998

35.2

1999

36.2

2000

36.9

2001

37.9

58.5

2002

38.2

56.8

2003

38.6

62.9

2004

39.4

63.2

2005(3)(4)

41.7

69.8

(3) Official 2005 population data are not yet available. 2005 data have therefore been estimated using Office for National Statistics 2004 mid-year population estimates based on the 2001 census as these are the latest available.

(4) Estimate.

Source:

The Information Centre for Health and Social Care General and Personal Medical Services Statistics Office for National Statistics 2001 Population Census

Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list the range of fees charged by the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board. [62566]

The information requested is shown in the table.

Service provided by the board

Fee payable

Relevant article of the order

Application for the award of a certificate of completion of training (CCT) in a speciality listed in schedule 3 to the order, including pursuant to the competent authority functions of the board

£500

£200 in respect of a re-submitted application or a review

Article 8(1), article 8(4) and article 20(3)(a)

Application for the award of a CCT in general practice

£500

Article 8(1) and article 8(4)

£200 in respect of a re-submitted application or a review

Application for a determination that training or qualifications, or both when considered together, are equivalent to a CCT in general practice, including issuing a statement of eligibility for registration if so requested

£950

£600 in respect of a re-submitted application or a review

Article 11(3) and article 11(7)

Application for a certificate of acquired rights to practise as a general practitioner

£250

£125 in respect of review

Article 12(3)

Application for a determination that an applicant has a particular expertise in a field within a speciality which is not made at the same time as an application referred to in entry 1, 2, 3, 6 or 7

£250

Article 13(4)(b) and (5)

Application for a determination that specialist training or specialist qualifications in a speciality listed in schedule 3 to the order, or both when considered together, are equivalent to a CCT in the speciality in question, including issuing a statement of eligibility for registration if so requested

£950

£600 in respect of a re-submitted application or a review

Article 14(4) and article 14(11)

Application for a determination that

(a) specialist training undertaken or specialist qualifications awarded outside the United Kingdom in a medical speciality not listed in schedule 3 to the order; or

£950

£600 in respect of a re-submitted application or a review

Article 14(5) and article 14(11)

(b) knowledge of or experience in a medical speciality derived from academic or research work has given a person a level of knowledge and skill consistent with practice as a consultant in the national health service including issuing a statement of eligibility for registration if so requested

Application for a duplicate copy of any certificate issued by the specialist training authority (STA), the joint committee on postgraduate training in general practice (JCPTGP) or the board

£75

Article 24(1)

Application for a certificate relating to training in the UK in certain specialities

£150

Article 20(l)(b)

Application for a certificate to a person holding specialist qualifications not satisfying the requirements of the directive, awarded following training begun before the relevant date referred to in article 15(2), by the UK, or where the person holding that qualification has practised that speciality in the UK

£250

Article 20(3)(b)

Application for a certificate of fulfilment of directive training requirements in respect of qualifications which do not conform with the designations set out in the directive

£150

Article 20(3)(c)

Application to an appeal panel for the determination of an appeal against a decision of the board

£1,400 (written appeal)

£2,100 (oral appeal)

Article 21(1)

Application for a certificate of completion of specialist training (CCST) in accordance with article 6 of the European Specialist Medical Qualifications Order (ESMQO) 1995 where a person has applied to the STA for a CCST and the application has not been determined before the relevant date (unless the fee prescribed by the STA has previously been paid to the STA in respect of that application)

£250

Paragraph 11(a) of schedule 8 to the order

Application for the determination of an appeal against a refusal by the board to award a CCST in accordance with article 13(1) of the ESMQO 1995

£700 (written appeal)

£1,400 (oral appeal)

Paragraph 11(b) of schedule 8 to the order

Application for a determination of eligibility for entry to the specialist register in accordance with article 9(2) or (3) of the ESMQO 1995 where a person has applied to the STA and the application has not been determined before the relevant date (unless the fee prescribed by the STA has previously been paid to the STA)

£950

Paragraph 12(a) of schedule 8 to the order

Application for the determination of any appeal against a decision of the board under article 9(2) or (3) of the ESMQO 1995

£700 (written appeal)

£1,400 (oral appeal)

Paragraph 12(b) of schedule 8 to the order

Application for the determination of an appeal against a decision of the STA, lodged before the relevant date, to be determined in accordance with the relevant article of the ESMQO 1995 (unless the fee prescribed by the STA has previously been paid to the STA in respect of that application)

£700 (written appeal)

£1,400 (oral appeal)

Paragraph 14 of schedule 8 to the order

Application for a statement of training, qualifications and experience in respect of which a certificate has been issued by the board, the STA or the JCPTGP

£150

Article 24(1)

Sexual and Reproductive Health

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 27 March 2006, Official Report, column 805W on sexual and reproductive health, how many officials provide the secretariat for the advisory group; what the grade is of each is, and what the cost was to her Department in each year since 2003–04. [64206]

The secretariat for the Independent Advisory Group on Sexual Health and HIV is shared between vice chairs of the group, with support from the Department as required, mainly in facilitation of the quarterly meetings of the group.

The cost of the support from the Department is less that £15,000 per annum.

Trade and Industry

Citizens Advice Bureaux

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the effect of the closure of Citizens Advice Bureaux on local communities. [63275]

The Department is not responsible for local Citizens Advice Bureaux each of which is an independent charity. The DTI provide £23.6 million in grant aid to Citizens Advice in 2005–06. The DTI has made no assessment of the effect of the closure of Citizens Advice Bureaux on local communities.

Energy Pre-Payment (Domestic Customers)

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will take steps to address the additional charges levied on domestic energy customers using pre-payment meters; and if he will make a statement. [64229]

The charges applied to pre-payment meters reflect the additional costs of the meter itself and the infrastructure required to support it. Any enforced reduction in the charges applied to pre-payment meters would have to be cross-subsidised by other customers, including pensioners and the fuel poor, the majority of whom do not use pre-payment meters. Pre-payment tariffs of individual suppliers vary, and, where customers prefer to retain a pre-payment meter, they may be able to reduce their expenditure by switching supplier.

Fuel Poverty Initiatives

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry

(1) what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of social programmes aimed at alleviating fuel poverty offered by the six major domestic energy supply companies; [63600]

(2) what role he expects the six major domestic energy supply companies to play in tackling fuel poverty, beyond their energy Efficiency Commitment Priority Group obligations; and if he will make a statement; [63601]

(3) what criteria are used by an energy supply company to class a tariff as a social tariff. [63602]

Each of the major domestic energy suppliers offer a number of programmes that assist vulnerable customers in various ways. The actual definition of a social tariff varies from company to company but is generally a lower price tariff directed towards a subset of vulnerable customers. It is for suppliers, not the Government, to design and set such tariffs.

Although information from individual suppliers about take-up of particular schemes is commercially confidential, an annex to the Government's UK Fuel Poverty Strategy Fourth Annual Progress Report, to be published later this year, will include information about the overall impacts of company schemes in 2004 and 2005. This will include information about actions companies have taken in 2004 and 2005 beyond their Energy Efficiency Priority Group obligations.

We continue to encourage energy companies to consider their most vulnerable consumers when considering price or service changes. I therefore welcome the trust funds and social tariffs announced, but continue to urge energy companies to do more.

Heating Fuel Costs

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry by how much the cost of heating fuel has changed in each year since 1997. [64422]

holding answer 18 April 2006

Percentages real terms year-on-year price changes for those fuels used in the domestic sector are shown in the following table.

Year-on-year percentage price changes since 1997 -- Fuel

Coal and smokeless fuels

Gas

Electricity

Heating oils

Total fuel and light

1996 to 1997

-2

-4

-8

-5

-6

1997 to 1998

-2

-6

-7

-19

-7

1998 to 1999

0

-3

-3

+10

-3

1999 to 2000

0

-4

-3

+39

-2

2000 to 2001

+2

0

-3

' -5

-2

2001 to 2002

+2

+3

-3

-8

0

2002 to 2003

-1

-1

-2

+8

-1

2003 to 2004

+3

+5

+4

+12

+5

2004 to 2005

+8

+10

+7

+26

+11

Source:

Retail Price Index, Office for National Statistics

Home Computing Initiative

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions the Department has had with the Treasury on the abolition of Home Computing Initiative tax relief. [62453]

holding answer 30 March 2006

My Department has had a number of discussions with the Treasury on Budget issues relevant to DTI, including the Home Computing Initiative.

Noise Induced Hearing Loss Claims

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much has been paid to (a) Beresfords, (b) UDM, (c) Vendside, (d) Wake Smith and (e) AMS Law for noise-induced hearing loss claims in each year since 2000; and what the average payment was in each case. [64452]

holding answer 19 April 2006

The costs payments made are set out in the table:

Solicitor

Solicitor payments made

Total solicitors costs (£)

Average (£)

2000

Beresfords

61

52,330

858

2001

Beresfords

1,314

902,897

687

2002

Beresfords

411

287,524

700

2003

Beresfords

336

299,029

890

2004

Beresfords

437

544,608

1,246

2005

Beresfords

650

699,678

1,076

2006(5)

Beresfords

65

71,779

1,104

2000

UDM/Vendside(6)

1,222

684,846

560

2001

UDM/Vendside

2,757

1,666,900

605

2002

UDM/Vendside

2,130

1,327,737

623

2003

UDM/Vendside

793

602,626

760

2004

UDM/Vendside

833

667,124

801

2005

UDM/Vendside

1,150

951,274

827

2006

UDM/Vendside

424

356,483

841

2000

Wake Smith

1

1,500

1,500

2001

Wake Smith

15

16,032

1,069

2002

Wake Smith

6

5,768

961

2003

Wake Smith

2

1,868

934

2004

Wake Smith

20

59,336

2,967

2005

Wake Smith

16

3,321

2,708

2006

Wake Smith

1

2,000

2,000

2000

AMS Law

170

109,219

642

2001

AMS Law

97

62,195

641

2002

AMS Law

78

59,619

764

2003

AMS Law

46

37,946

825

2004

AMS Law

55

53,784

978

2005

AMS Law

34

29,512

868

2006

AMS Law

3

2,569

856

(5) 2006 figures reflect the position up to 16 April 2006

(6) The Union of Democratic Mineworkers register claims on behalf of their members. Vendside operate a claims handling company on behalf of the UDM and as such administration of claims is processed via Vendside Limited

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many claimants have been paid for noise-induced hearing loss in (a) Bassetlaw and (b) Nottinghamshire since 1999. [64453]

holding answer 19 April 2006

The number of claimants paid for noise-induced hearing loss since 1999 is 1,389 in Bassetlaw and 11,163 in Nottinghamshire1 .

1 Nottinghamshire covers the constituencies of Ashfield, Bassetlaw, Broxtowe, Gedling, Mansfield, Newark, Nottingham East, Nottingham North, Nottingham South, Rushcliffe and Sherwood

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what agreements on costs have been reached for noise-induced hearing loss claims with (a) Beresfords, (b) Wake Smith, (c) AMS Law, (d) UDM and (e) Vendside; and when each agreement (i) began and (ii) will end. [64454]

holding answer 19 April 2006

The Department's agreement on costs for noise-induced hearing loss claims with Beresfords was reached in December 2000 and ended in March 2002. The current agreement with the UDM was reached in May 2003, is ongoing, and covers claims originating with the Union but submitted by either their claims handling company, Vendside, or the solicitors AMS Law. We do not have an agreement with Wake Smith.

Social Tariffs

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions (a) he and (b) his officials have had with representatives of gas and electricity supply companies on improving the information on social tariffs provided to customers. [64379]

DTI officials and I have regular contact with all of the major energy supply companies and their trade organisation, the Energy Retail Association, on a wide range of issues, including the introduction of social tariffs by energy companies. With DTI's encouragement, the energy suppliers established the Home Heat helpline, which, among other things, provides customers with advice on the most appropriate tariff, including information on social tariffs. It is for individual suppliers to determine how best to market their tariffs.

Telephone Preference Service Regulations

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many letters the Information Commissioner's Office has sent to date to (a) companies that have had in excess of 50 complaints made against them under telephone preference service regulations and (b) to companies breaching telephone preference service regulations. [62238]

The Information Commissioner is responsible for administering the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003. Regulation 21 of these regulations relates to unsolicited direct marketing telephone calls. It should be note that complaints received by his office about breaches of Regulation 21 concern calls made to Telephone Preference Service (TPS) registered numbers and also organisation not to make marketing calls to that number.

Due to the nature of the casework management system used by the Information Commissioner's Office he is unable to identify companies about which more than 40 complaints have been received about alleged breaches of Regulation 21 and is therefore unable to identify how many letters have been sent to companies about which more than 50 such complaints have been received.

To date, the Information Commissioner has written to organisations in 1,754 cases regarding an alleged breach of Regulation 21.

So far the Information Commissioner has been able to deal with complaints relating to alleged breaches of Regulation 21 of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003, through informal resolution with the organisations concerned. Information Commissioner has not needed to initiate formal enforcement action against any organisation for breaching Regulation 21. As most cases have been resolved at any early stage of their proceedings.

Telephone Service Providers

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many complaints about telephone cold calling were made against (a) the Labour party, (b) the Conservative party, (c) the Scottish National party and (d) the Green party since the introduction of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) 2003; and on how many occasions the Information Commissioner has initiated formal action in response to these complaints. [61652]

The Information Commissioner is responsible for administering the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003. Regulation 21 of these regulations relates to unsolicited direct marketing telephone calls. It should be noted that complaints received by his office about breaches of Regulation 21 concern not just calls made to Telephone Preference Service (TPS) registered numbers but also calls made to numbers where the subscriber has directly asked the calling organisation not to make marketing calls to that number. Also, Regulation 19 relates to the use of unsolicited direct marketing automated telephone calls.

The number of complaints about telephone cold calling made against the parties since the introduction of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) in 2003 is as follows:

Number

(a) Labour party

Total Regulation 19 complaints

16

'Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints

0

Total Regulation 21 complaints

4

'Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints

0

(b) Conservative party(7)

Total Regulation 19 complaints

5

'Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints

5

Total Regulation 21 complaints

8

'Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints

0

(c) Scottish National party(8)

Total Regulation 19 complaints

5

'Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints

5

Total Regulation 21 complaints

0

'Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints

0

(d) Green party

Total Regulation 19 complaints

0

'Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints

0

Total Regulation 21 complaints

0

'Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints

0

(e) Liberal Democrats

Total Regulation 19 complaints

0

'Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints

0

Total Regulation 21 complaints

1

'Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints

0

(f) UKIP

Total Regulation 19 complaints

0

'Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints

0

Total Regulation 21 complaints

0

'Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints

0

(g) Plaid Cymru

Total Regulation 19 complaints

0

'Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints

0

Total Regulation 21 complaints

0

'Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints

0

(h) Respect

Total Regulation 19 complaints

0

'Upheld' Regulation 19 complaints

0

Total Regulation 21 complaints

0

'Upheld' Regulation 21 complaints

0

(7) In 2005 the Information Commissioner issued one enforcement notice under Regulation 19 against the Conservative party.

(8) In 2005 the Information Commissioner issued one enforcement notice under Regulation 19 against the Scottish National party.

Note:

The term 'Upheld' also includes cases where the Information Commissioner decided that enforcement action was not appropriate even though there may have been some breach of the regulations.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry

(1) against how many UK companies more than 50 complaints have been made under the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003; [61653]

(2) on how many occasions the Information Commissioner has taken against firms in breach of telephone preference service rules; and whether the Information Commissioner has taken action against firms about which he has received more than 50 complaints. [61654]

The Information Commissioner is responsible for administering the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003. Regulation 21 of these regulations relates to unsolicited direct marketing telephone calls. It should be note that complaints received by his office about breaches of Regulation 21 concern calls made to Telephone Preference Service (TPS) registered numbers and also organisation not to make marketing calls to that number.

Due to the nature of the casework management system used by the Information Commissioner's Office he is unable to identify companies about which more than 40 complaints have been received about alleged breaches of Regulation 21 and is therefore unable to identify how many letters have been sent to companies about which more than 50 such complaints have been received.

To date, the Information Commissioner has written to organisations in 1,754 cases regarding an alleged breach of Regulation 21.

So far the Information Commissioner has been able to deal with complaints relating to alleged breaches of Regulation 21 of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003, through informal resolution with the organisations concerned. Information Commissioner has not needed to initiate formal enforcement action against any organisation for breaching Regulation 21. As most cases have been resolved at any early stage of their proceedings.

Vibration White Finger

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many miners' claims for (a) vibration white finger and (b) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have been pursued by solicitors through common law since 1999. [64439]

Since 1999, 178 vibration white finger and 25 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease claims have been pursued through common law.

Defence

Courts Martial

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the average waiting time was for a case to go to court martial in the (a) Army, (b) Royal Navy (c) Royal Air Force in 2005. [57472]

pursuant to the reply, 13 March 2006, Official Report, c. 1945W

The following notes should have appeared after the list.

Notes:

1. Royal Navy figure shows the average delay between charge and appearing at court martial and the year in which court martial was convened. 2. Army figure shows the average delay between the date of the offence and appearing at court martial and the year in which the court martial was convened. 3. Royal Air Force figure shows the average delay between the point that the case papers are received by the Court Administration Unit (which administers arrangements for the court martial) to the trial date and appearing at court martial) and the cases that commenced in 2005.

Defence Intelligence and Security Centre

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the Government Departments which sent officials on courses run by the Defence Intelligence and Security Centre in 2004–05. [63393]

The Defence Intelligence and Security Centre provides training primarily for the armed forces and the Ministry of Defence. In 2004–05, the following Government Departments sent officials on courses run by the Defence Intelligence and Security Centre:

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Home Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many US personnel are based at the Defence Intelligence and Security Centre. [63455]

Qinetiq

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the terms were of the loan agreed with Qinetiq, referred to in the National Audit Office Audit of Assumptions for Budget 2006, pages five and six. [63628]

The detailed terms of the loan are contained in the Aquila/Chertsey loan note, a copy of which will be placed in the Library of the House. Qinetiq's payments to the Ministry of Defence were staged in line with the sale receipts received. The loan has now been repaid in full.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the 'specific properties' were on which the Qinetiq loan referred to on page five of the National Audit Office Audit of Assumptions for Budget 2006 was secured. [63677]

The properties were the sites at Aquila (Bromley) and Chertsey. Further details can be found in the Aquila/Chertsey Loan Note, a copy of which will be placed in the Library of the House.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when the loan taken out by Qinetiq referred to in pages 5 and 6 of the National Audit Office Audit of Assumptions for Budget 2006 was first made public. [63678]

The loan note was first made public during the Defence Select Committee evidence session of 21 January 2003 on the Qinetiq PPP, (para. 91 of the Defence Committee Minutes of Evidence of 21 January 2003 refers), as the note was to form part of the consideration for the sale of Qinetiq to Carlyle in February 2003.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence

(1) what penalties were incurred by Qinetiq for failure to pay the 2004–05 repayments on the loan referred to on pages 5 and 6 of the National Audit Office's Audit of Assumptions for Budget 2006; [62398]

(2) what the timetable is for Qinetiq's repayment of the remaining £46 million of the loan referred to on page seven of the National Audit Office Audit of Assumptions for Budget 2006; [63626]

(3) for what reasons Qinetiq did not meet the expected timetable of repayments in 2004 for the loan note secured on the sale of 'specific properties', referred to on pages five and six of the National Audit Office Audit of Assumptions for Budget 2006. [63676]

holding answer 30 March 2006

There were no penalties, and no fixed term for the repayment of the loan referred to in the National Audit Office's Audit. This was the Aquila/Chertsey Loan Note, between the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and Qinetiq, which formed part of the receipt from the initial sale of a minority equity interest in Qinetiq to Carlyle in 2003. The loan note was secured against the sale of Qinetiq property at Aquila (Bromley) and Chertsey. No firm schedule of repayments could be laid down as the income from the sale was conditional on the achievement of various stages of planning permission, and so the Budget assumptions were based on estimates of time scales for this planning permission. These original estimates were not achieved, and hence payments to be made by Qinetiq to the MOD slipped.

The loan note has been repaid in stages with the bulk of the money, some £43.5 million being paid in September 2005, and the final outstanding amount, some £2.5 million being paid at the end of March 2006.

Macedonia

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the bid by Macedonia to join NATO; and if he will make a statement. [64488]

I have been asked to reply.

The UK welcomes Macedonia's bid to join NATO. Macedonia is a member of NATO's Partnership for Peace and has a Membership Action Plan. We look forward to her eventual membership. But, as for all applicants, Macedonia must first meet the membership criteria in full. Good progress is being made in defence reform, although further work is needed. Political conditionality is also important. This includes full implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement, and reform of the economy and the judiciary. The proper conduct of parliamentary elections later this year will be an important element in meeting the political conditionality requirements.

Nuclear Equipment (Waste)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the total amount of waste produced by nuclear submarines and their reactors has been over the last 30 years. [63780]

No central records are held on the total amount of waste produced by nuclear submarines and their reactors over the last 30 years. However, records held by individual sites in the UK involved in the nuclear submarine programme show that since 1988, the earliest date for which records are available, 3,344 m3 of Low Level Radioactive Waste (before treatment and super-compaction) and 114 m 3 of Intermediate Radioactive Waste has been produced.

The "United Kingdom Radioactive Waste Inventory" to which the Ministry of Defence contributes provides periodic snapshots on all radioactive waste stocks, including levels of waste, location and whether the waste is held in temporary or permanent storage. The inventory has previously been published to show snapshots of waste stocks in 1984,1985,1986,1987,1988,1989, 1991, 1994, 1998 and 2001, and a copy of the most recent inventory, for 2004, is available on Nirex's website at http://www.nirex.co.uk/foi/ukinvent/.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the total amount of waste produced from nuclear warheads that have been decommissioned has been over the last 30 years. [63781]

The amount of waste arising specifically from the decommissioning of nuclear warheads is not recorded separately from waste arising from other phases of the programme. The information requested cannot therefore be provided.

Records of radioactive wastes for the totality of the nuclear warhead programme are published periodically by NIREX in the Nuclear Waste Inventory sponsored by DEFRA. The latest issue is dated 19 January 2006 and is available at http://www.nirex.co.uk.

Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer to question 61540, on pension rights, what employment status members of the reserve forces are classed as having. [64084]

Members of the reserve forces are part of the armed forces of the Crown and the power to maintain them is found in section 1 of the Reserve Forces Act 1996. That Act provides a number of different forms of service which reservists may undertake. The conditions of service which reservists serve under reflect the form of service undertaken.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make it his policy to advise relatives of deceased armed services personnel to seek independent legal advice before signing pensions contracts; and if he will make a statement. [64040]

Dependants of deceased service personnel do not have to sign a pension contract to receive death benefits from the armed forces pension schemes. The benefits are paid in accordance with the terms of the appropriate pension scheme. The only requirement is for the dependant to confirm they are an eligible beneficiary and to sign a claim form to that effect. The Ministry of Defence already advises in its explanatory armed forces pension booklets that, if individuals require financial or legal advice regarding pension matters, they should seek independent advice.

Submarines (Astute Class)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when he expects Astute class submarines (a) HMS Ambush and (b) HMS Artful to come into service. [64245]

International Development

Renewable Energy

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what renewable energy projects his Department is supporting in developing countries. [62475]

DFID is committed to increasing access to reliable and affordable energy as an essential catalyst for reducing poverty and increasing economic growth in developing countries. We agree that renewable energy has an increasingly important role to play in helping developing countries make progress towards the Millennium Development Goals.

DFID is working with international networks such as the Global Village Energy Partnership (GVEP) and the EU energy initiative (EUEI) to promote access to affordable energy services, drawing on the full menu of technology options, including renewable energy.

DFID has supported the creation of a new €220 million EU energy facility, which will invite calls for proposals later this year. This grant fund aims to improve access to reliable and affordable energy, especially in Africa, and is encouraging viable renewable energy proposals.

We are also encouraging the World Bank and other development partners to give renewable energy greater attention as part of their efforts to improve access to energy.

The World Bank is scaling up its financial support for renewable energy and energy efficiency and announced in December 2005, a rise to $299 million for the year to June 2005, compared to an average of $209 million per annum over the previous three years. These figures exclude large hydropower projects and exceed the commitment they made in 2004 to increase their renewable energy and energy efficiency investments by 20 per cent. per annum over the next five years. We very much welcome this increased investment by the World Bank on clean energy.

DFID has provided around £3.4 million for renewable energy research projects in the last eight years. This was spent on the development and promotion of renewable energy, especially for rural communities. It has included a wide range of technologies such as wind, small hydropower, solar and biomass.

Sri Lanka

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what contribution the UK is making towards the efforts to destroy landmines in Sri Lanka. [63116]

The United Kingdom is a major contributor to mine action in Sri Lanka. We have provided £1 million through the United Nations to support demining and mine awareness in conflict affected areas. A further £669,766 has been committed to two non governmental organisations (NGOs), the Mine Action Group and the HALO Trust, for mine action between 2004 and 2007.

The programmes, together with those from the wider international community, have been successful. Deaths from mines have been largely eliminated, although there are still a small number of casualties each year, especially in the far north of Sri Lanka. Nevertheless the Government estimate that some 700,000 to 1,000,000 mines remain to be cleared.

Given the dependence upon mines in militarily significant areas, it will be many more years before Sri Lanka will be landmine free, and before the Government will feel able to sign the Ottawa Treaty. The Government of Sri Lanka is planning to create within the Sri Lankan army, a national capability to pursue mine action work after 2008. DFID will review progress during 2007 and, in the light of this, consider further support.

World Cup (Complimentary Tickets)

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how many complimentary tickets his Department has received for games taking place at the FIFA World Cup 2006 in Germany. [63911]

Leader of the House

Media Briefing

To ask the Leader of the House under what circumstances Ministers are permitted to release material to media outlets in advance of a statement being made to Parliament, when the House is sitting. [63155]

Paragraph 7.1 of the Ministerial Code makes it clear that

"When Parliament is in session, the most important announcements of Government policy should be made, in the first instance, in Parliament."

Work and Pensions

Financial Assistance Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the (a) average, (b) highest and (c) lowest payment made to individuals under the Financial Assistance Scheme has been; what the equivalent figures are for recipients living in Wales; and if he will make a statement. [64133]

The Financial Assistance Scheme will provide a qualifying member with assistance that will top up their scheme pension to a level broadly equivalent to 80 per cent. of their expected pension. Payments are subject to a de minimis level and a cap. Initial payments, when made, provide a top up to 60 per cent. of expected pension.

The following monthly payments have been made, before deduction of income tax.

£

(a) average

190.34

(b) highest

629.84

(c) lowest

50.08

The equivalent figures for recipients living in Wales are

£

(a) average

196.21

(b) highest

629.84

(c) lowest

50.08

Jobcentre Plus

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will list the (a) public, (b) private and (c) voluntary sector organisations which have contracts with Jobcentre Plus. [61415]

The administration of Jobcentre Plus is a matter for the chief executive of Jobcentre Plus, Lesley Strathie. She will write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Lesley Strathie

The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your question asking if he will list the(a) public (b) private and (c) voluntary sector organisations which have contracts with Jobcentre Plus. This is something which falls within the responsibilities delegated to me as Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus.

Information on contracts awarded prior to September 2005 is not broken down in the way in which you have requested and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. However, I am able to provide a list of organisations to which Jobcentre Plus has awarded contracts since September 2005, broken down by legal status, and this is set out in the attached table.

I hope this is helpful.

Table of contracts let since September 2005 to organisations listed by legal status

Company name

Legal status

Cornwall College

Further Education College

Lauder College

Further Education College

New College Nottingham

Further Education College

Plymouth College of Further Education

Further Education College

Preston College

Further Education College

Stephenson College

Further Education College

York College

Further Education College

Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council

Statutory Body—Local Authority

Bolton Metropolitan Council

Statutory Body—Local Authority

East Lindsey District Council

Statutory Body—Local Authority

Halton Borough Council

Statutory Body—Local Authority

Northamptonshire County Council

Statutory Body—Local Authority

West Lothian Council

Statutory Body—Local Authority

Blackburn and Darwen Primary Care Trust

Statutory Body—NHS

Remploy

Executive Non-Departmental Public Body

DASH Training Partnership

Partnership—Unlimited

Bradford Cathedral Centre Limited

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Cheshire Deaf Society

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Claverhouse Training

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Connexions Staffordshire

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Connexions West of England

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

CPR Regeneration

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Derbyshire Chamber and Business Link

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Ellingham Employment Services

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Employment Opportunities for People with Disabilities

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Glasgow Mentoring Network

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Highways to Opportunities

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Instant Muscle

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

JHP Training

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

NECTA Ltd.

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

North East Chamber of Commerce

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Northumberland Business Services

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Nottingham Mencap

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

O-Regen

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Pendle Re-Employment

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Pentreath

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Phoenix Enterprises

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Quest For Economic Development Ltd.

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Sabre Employment

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Scout Enterprises (Western)

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Support Training Ltd.

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Sure Start North Prospect LARK Project

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

TBG Learning

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

The Mid Yorkshire Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Training) Ltd.

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Training 2000

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Training West Lancashire

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Upturn Enterprises

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

West Cumbria Trades Hall Centre

Private Company (limited by guarantee)

Action for Employment

Private Company (limited by shares)

ATS

Private Company (limited by shares)

BTCV

Private Company (limited by shares)

Business Employment Services Training Limited

Private Company (limited by shares)

Care Training

Private Company (limited by shares)

Career Development Centre

3rivate Company (limited by shares)

CeeMac Projects UK

Private Company (limited by shares)

City and County Training Limited

Private Company (limited by shares)

Community Systems

Private Company (limited by shares)

Cullisvale Services

Private Company (limited by shares)

DHP Enterprise Limited

Private Company (limited by shares)

Easton Learning Centre

Private Company (limited by shares)

ERP Ltd.

Private Company (limited by shares)

Fern Training and Development

Private Company (limited by shares)

Hargreaves Training Services Ltd.

Private Company (limited by shares)

Inspire to Independence

Private Company (limited by shares)

Keeping It Simple Training

Private Company (limited by shares)

Kennedy Scott

Private Company (limited by shares)

Lake District Training Academy

Private Company (limited by shares)

Local Labour Initiative for Training and Enterprise (Llite) Limited

Private Company (limited by shares)

Management Introductions Ltd.

Private Company (limited by shares)

Manchester Training Ltd.

Private Company (limited by shares)

Newquay for Excellence Training

Private Company (limited by shares)

OTR

Private Company (limited by shares)

Pelcombe Limited

Private Company (limited by shares)

Personnel Evaluation Consultants Limited

Private Company (limited by shares)

Pertemps Mouzer

Private Company (limited by shares)

positive people

Private Company (limited by shares)

Reed in Partnership plc

Private Company (limited by shares)

Seetec

Private Company (limited by shares)

Shackleton Associates

Private Company (limited by shares)

Skills Training

Private Company (limited by shares)

Standguide Ltd.

Private Company (limited by shares)

Support into Work

Private Company (limited by shares)

The JGA Group

Private Company (limited by shares)

TNG Mentoring

Private Company (limited by shares)

TNG Workskills

Private Company (limited by shares)

Tony Walsh Associates

Private Company (limited by shares)

Triage Central

Private Company (limited by shares)

Twin Training International

Private Company (limited by shares)

Wakefield Environmental Developments Limited

Private Company (limited by shares)

Working Links

Private Company (limited by shares)

WTCS

Private Company (limited by shares)

Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce

Private Body Under Royal Charter

BBC

Public Body Under Royal Charter

Tribal Group

Public Limited Company (PLC)

Aberdeen Foyer

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

Action for Blind People

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

Bootstrap Enterprises

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

DISC

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

East Lancashire into Employment

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

Eco Actif Services Social Enterprise

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

One Plus

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

PROSPECTS The National Autistic Society

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

Rainer City Training Solent

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

RNID

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

Rochdale Building Trades Agency

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

Royal Mencap Society

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations (SCVO)

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

Shaw Trust

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

Somerset Council for Christian Care

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

The Dyslexia Institute Ltd.

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

The Wise Group

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

YBT Trust

Voluntary and Community Sector—Charity

Pension Service

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions whether it is the policy of the Pension Service to refuse to accept telephone call claims for pension credit from citizens advice bureaux' advisers on behalf of clients. [64503]

The Pension Service welcomes calls from Citizens Advice Bureaux and any third parties acting on behalf of our customers. Third party callers are expected to confirm their client's security identity and their authority to speak on the client's behalf. Once this has been confirmed, the application is taken as normal.

Northern Ireland

Colin Worton

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what assessment he has made of the police handling of the Colin Worton case. [63445]

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has reviewed Mr. Worton's case and taken account of the assessment made by the trial judge and the Police Ombudsman and has concluded that there is no evidence of serious default by the police. The Secretary of State has written to Mr. Worton advising him of the decision in his case.

Illegal Drugs

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland pursuant to the answer of 1 March 2006, Official Report, column 778W, on illegal drugs, how many of those convicted for drug-related offences served custodial sentences. [59610]

The table provides the number of those convicted of drug-related offences who were sentenced to immediate custody from 2000 to 2003. Sentence data beyond 2003 are currently not available.

2000

2001

2002

2003

Importing

1

0

0

0

Distributing

81

65

44

56

Other

41

23

22

23

Total

123

88

66

79

Source:

The Northern Ireland Office

IntertradeIreland

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will commission an independent review into the management and operation of IntertradeIreland. [58936]

I am aware of recent anonymous allegations about the financial management and other matters in IntertradeIreland. The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment, in conjunction with the Southern co-sponsor Department and the Board of IntertradeIreland, has already initiated urgent inquiries into the issues raised in the letter.

Saville Report

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland when the Saville Report will be published. [64300]

The independent Bloody Sunday Inquiry has informed me that they are now engaged in compiling their final report. Due to the vast amount of evidence that must be considered this is a very time consuming process and it is difficult at this stage to be precise about when the report will be presented to the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland.

Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

Acholi People

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps the Government are taking to assist the Acholi people of Uganda who have been internally displaced and are living in camps. [64029]

The Acholi are one of the biggest communities affected by the long-running and brutal conflict in northern Uganda. In some of the affected districts over 90 per cent. of the population are displaced by the conflict and in total 1.7 million Ugandans are living in camps for internally displaced people.

The Ugandan Government have primary responsibility to protect its citizens and to deal with the conflict and its humanitarian consequences. The UK has helped lead international efforts to address the underlying causes of the problems in northern Uganda and to provide humanitarian assistance to those affected, including the Acholi.

Over the last 12 months we have provided over £20 million in humanitarian assistance; this includes £10.7 million to the World Food Programme to provide food and £6.8 million to support a UN inter-agency programme to address health problems in the camps. We have recently agreed to channel an additional £4.9 million over two years to the United Nations Children's Fund's (UNICEF) programmes covering water and sanitation and the provision of emergency requirements, such as shelter and protection.

Arab League Summit

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of the outcome of the recent Arab League summit in Khartoum; and if he will make a statement. [64489]

The Arab League summit took place in Khartoum on 28–29 March. The summit covered a wide range of issues but focussed on the situation in Darfur and the Middle East Peace Process.

We welcome the focus of the recent Arab League summit on the situation in Darfur. It is important that the Arab League and its member states do all they can, in co-ordination with the rest of the international community, to help resolve the conflict in Darfur. In particular, we call on them to use their influence to press the Government of Sudan and the rebel movements to reach a peace deal by the deadline of 30 April as set by the African Union.

The Arab League's re-endorsement of the Beirut Declaration at the Arab summit in Khartoum is also a welcome step. We look forward to working with the Arab League, Israel and the Palestinian Authority towards a comprehensive, just and lasting peace based on a two state solution with Israeli and Palestinian states living side by side in peace.

Ascension Island

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions (a) he and (b) officials from his Department have had on the future of Ascension Island since 14 March 2006; and with whom the discussions were held. [63679]

My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary has not held discussions on the future of Ascension Island since 14 March 2006.

Officials in London have met with the following interlocutors to discuss a range of issues related to Ascension Island:

21 March 2006

The Administrator of Ascension Island

A member of the public and constituent of Mr. Cable

22 March 2006

Representatives of the User Organisations on Ascension Island

(Permanent Joint Headquarters (Ministry of Defence), VT

Merlin, Government Communications Headquarters, Cable and

Wireless, Crown Counsel Designate, St Helena)

28 March 2006

Overseas Territories Department (Foreign and Commonwealth Office) internal meeting

29 March 2006

Managing Director and Director, Richard James International

30 March 2006

Director of Finance, Ascension Island

The administrator on Ascension Island met the US base commander and his immediate superior from Patrick air force base on 4 April 2006.

Belarus

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs on how many occasions the UK Government has made representations to the Government of Belarus in the past 12 months regarding oppression of people on the grounds of religious belief in that country. [63268]

holding answer of 18 April 2006

The Government continues to raise human rights issues with the Belarusian authorities, both bilaterally and together with EU partners. During the past 12 months we raised the case of one Protestant church on four separate occasions and restrictions on freedom of worship in general on at least 12 occasions. Freedom of worship was also referred to in a resolution critical of Belarus' human rights record sponsored by the EU at the April 2005 UN Commission on Human Rights. Our ambassador in Minsk also met with leaders of churches under pressure from the authorities to hear their concerns.

Burma (IDPs)

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of the number of internally displaced persons in Burma; and if he will make a statement. [64491]

It is estimated that there are at least 540,000 internally displaced persons in Burma, though detailed information is hard to obtain. We are aware of renewed large-scale displacements in northern Karen State. In addition to this, there are approximately 500,000 refugees in neighbouring countries. We continue to monitor the situation closely.

Falun Gong

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the treatment of Falun Gong prisoners in China; and what representations the Government has made to the government of China about the alleged practices at the Chinese Sujiatun camp. [64059]

We regularly raise human rights with the Chinese government, including the treatment of individual Falun Gong practitioners. Individual Falun Gong cases were raised with the Chinese government at the last round of the EU-China Human Rights Dialogue in October 2005.

The Government have seen no evidence to substantiate the reports circulating about the treatment of Falun Gong practitioners in Sujiatun camp. We have not made representations to the Chinese government about these reports. However, I raised concerns on 7 April with the Chinese government about the general practice of organ harvesting from death row prisoners and the trade in their organs.

The Government welcome the announcement by the Chinese Ministry of Health of a new regulation to come into effect on 1 July, to ban the sale of organs and introduce medical standards for organ transplants.

Foreign Policy Centre

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs for what purposes his Department provides funding to the Foreign Policy Centre; and how much has been provided in each year since 1997. [63247]

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) has not provided any funding to the Foreign Policy Centre in this period. We define 'funding' as payments made to an organisation which are not in respect of goods or services that the organisation has or will be providing to the FCO, but are instead made to support the organisation in its work.

A number of payments have been made to the Foreign Policy Centre during this period, but all such payments have been for goods and/or services provided by this organisation. The following payments over £100 were made:

£

2003

Consultancy Work

8,125

2003

Organising Consular Seminar

10,060

2003

Consultancy work for the Community Relations Unit

26,300

4 April 2004

Glasgow Discussion Sheets for Partnerships and Networks Development Unit (now UK Outreach)

2,500

7 July 2004

Part payment for organisation of a meeting at Ditchley Park

35,000

15 September 2004

Part payment for organisation of a meeting at Ditchley Park

35,000

27 January 2005

Chinese New Year Event List for Partnerships and Networks Development Unit (now UK Outreach)

3,950

29 January 2005

Africa List for Partnerships and Networks Development Unit (now UK Outreach)

3,950

25 February 2005

Part payment for organisation of a meeting at Ditchley Park

23,095

13 April 2005

Welsh List for Partnerships and Networks Development Unit (now UK Outreach)

3,950

30 October 2005

Contribution to the cost of design and production of 1,500 "Europe in a Global Age" pamphlets

1,615

17 March 2006

Payment for organising a foreign policy seminar

26,950

France (Rioting)

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether he has had discussions with the French Government about the recent riots. [64318]

General Ratko Mladic

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of the recent disclosure by the government of Serbia, that Serbian intelligence and army officials conspired to conceal the movements of General Ratko Mladic; and if he will make a statement. [64492]

We have noted the public disclosure from the Supreme Defence Council in February, based on a military security service report, that elements of the Serbia and Montenegro military had sheltered Mladic until June 2002. The UK expects all those involved in sheltering Mladic to be fully investigated and prosecuted. Full co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia remains a fundamental requirement for Serbia and Montenegro to move closer to Euro-Atlantic integration.

Guatemala

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent assessment he has made of (a) human rights and (b) the rule of law in Guatemala. [64510]

The Human Rights situation in Guatemala has improved since the signing of the Peace Accords in 1996, following 36 years of conflict. However, we continue to be concerned by the growth of organised crime, the activities of gangs, called maras, and widespread impunity which threaten the rule of law in Guatemala. We are also concerned by attacks on human rights defenders and the increase in violence against women.

Our Embassy in Guatemala City works closely with human rights organisations and will continue to press the Guatemalan authorities to implement in full the 1996 Peace Accords, investigate reports of human rights abuses thoroughly and tackle impunity.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of the likelihood of bringing to justice those responsible for mass killings in Guatemala in the 1980s; and if he will make representations to the government of Guatemala on this matter. [64511]

The signing of the Guatemalan Peace Accords in 1996 brought an end to 36 years of conflict. The Peace Accords provided a blueprint for the Guatemalan authorities to pursue a process of social reforms, including the capacity to bring those responsible for human rights abuses to justice.

Though we have noted the progress made by the Guatemalan government in implementing the Peace Accords, that progress is slow and there is still much to be done. Many perpetrators of human rights violations continue to escape justice due to a weak judicial system.

The United Kingdom will continue to encourage the Guatemalan government to implement in full the 1996 Peace Accords, which covers improvements to the Guatemalan Judicial System. We will continue to monitor the efforts made by the Guatemalan authorities to bring those responsible for human rights violations to justice.

Holy See (British Ambassador)

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs who the British ambassador to the Holy See was in each year since 1983; what relevant specialist qualifications the present incumbent holds; and what the details of his career are to date. [64209]

Since 1983, the British ambassador to the Holy See has been:

1982–1985

Mark (later Sir Mark) Heath

1985–1988

David Lane

1988–1991

John Bradley

1991–1995

Andrew Palmer

1995–1998

Maureen MacGlashen

1998–2002

Mark Pellew

2002–2005

Kathryn Colvin

2005 to date

Francis Campbell

The ambassador to the Holy See needs to be a high-calibre individual, with proven political and strategic awareness, diplomatic and interpersonal skills, have an in-depth knowledge of Government, be able to deal with complex issues, be able to build effective and lasting relationships and be able to communicate in Italian and French to a high standard.

The present ambassador's particular knowledge and understanding of the mechanics of Government, his background in diplomacy, his experience outside the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), his work with faith organisations and civil society in the UK and internationally make him ideally placed to promote and develop the UK's International Priorities with regard to the Holy See. The details of the ambassador's career are:

Curriculum Vitae

Full name

Mr. Francis Martin-Xavier Campbell

Date of birth

20 April 1970

2005

Senior Policy Director, Amnesty International

2003–2005

1st Secretary, British Embassy to Italy

2001–2003

On secondment to No. 10 Downing street as Private Secretary to the Prime Minister

1999–2001

On secondment to No. 10 Downing street as Policy Adviser to the Prime Minister

1998–1999

European Enlargement Unit, FCO

1997–1998

On secondment to the European Commission— appointed to the EC Delegation at the UN in New York for the UK Presidency of the EU

1997

European Enlargement Unit, FCO

1996–1997

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (MA)

1994–1995

Katholieke University of Leuven, Belgium (MA)

1989–1992

Queen's University Belfast (BA)

Jericho Prison

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what observations in relation to (a) living standards for prisoners, (b) visits to prisoners and (c) locking of doors at night were made by the British Independent Monitors at Jericho Prison. [61002]

The monitors observed a set list of conditions to determine if the six detainees were secluded continuously. These conditions did not include examining the living conditions. The monitors observed the numbers of visitors, the time of the visits and if the visitors were searched. Monitors were unable to verify if all the doors were locked at night.

Joseph Kony

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether it is the policy of his Department to bring Joseph Kony before the International Crime Court. [64031]

Yes. The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued warrants for the arrest of five Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) commanders, including Joseph Kony, in October 2005. Responsibility to effect the arrest warrants lies in the first instance with the states on whose territory the five LRA commanders are believed to be, in this case Uganda, Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

The UK is a strong supporter of the work of the ICC in its efforts to bring to justice the perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity. We have stressed to the Governments of Uganda, Sudan and the DRC their obligations to detain the LRA commanders facing arrest warrants.

Kosovo

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent assessment he has made of levels of ethnic tension in northern Kosovo between ethnic Serbs and Albanians; and if he will make a statement. [64490]

The situation throughout Kosovo remains tense but broadly stable as the United Nations-led final status process continues. I strongly condemn the criminal acts that have taken place in northern Kosovo in recent weeks. The Government fully supports the efforts of the Kosovo Police Service and the United Nations Mission in Kosovo to bring those responsible for such acts to justice.

The London Contact Group Ministerial statement of 31 January 2006 made clear that a final status settlement must be underpinned by principles that promote a multi-ethnic society. A copy of the statement has been placed in the Library of the House. In the context of the final status process we expect community leaders to continue to engage in creating a climate conducive to bridging the ethnic divide not only in northern Kosovo but the entire territory.

Lords Resistance Army

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of the strength of the Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda. [64030]

There are no authoritative figures available for the current operational strength of the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA). It is likely that the total number has declined in recent years and current estimates put the number of combatants in hundreds rather than thousands.

The largest concentration of LRA fighters is thought to be currently based in the Garamba National Park in north-eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Elsewhere it is thought that the LRA has a presence in southern Sudan as well as northern Uganda, where it operates in relatively small groups and is highly mobile.

Pakistan

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent assessment he has made of the political situation in Pakistan; and if he will make a statement. [64072]

The political situation in Pakistan is continuously evolving. Despite occasional outbreaks of sectarian and other violence, the appalling bomb explosion in Karachi on 11 April being the most recent example, the country remains generally stable and Pakistan is an important partner for achieving UK strategic objectives. Officials in both London and Pakistan meet regularly with members of the Pakistani Government, opposition parties and members of civil society to ensure that we remain abreast of developments. We continue to work towards ensuring that the 2007 elections are both free and fair, thus helping Pakistan's return to full democracy.

Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what proportion of members of the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme in his Department joined the scheme before the age of (a) 20, (b) 25, (c) 30, (d) 35, (e) 40, (f) 45 and (g) over 45 years old. [62015]

The information is not currently available as my Department would need to review its pension records manually and this would incur disproportionate cost. We are currently upgrading our IT systems and I will write to the hon. Member should this information become available.

Education and Skills

Connexions

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many hits the Connexions website received in each month since its inception. [64200]

The Connexions Direct website www.connexions-direct.com was launched on 21 October 2002.

The following table details monthly visits to the Connexions Direct website.

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

January

19,073

99,752

146,769

381,864

February

16,505

92,186

164,107

316,642

March

18,813

103,461

197,030

441,149

April

14,373

83,947

167,301

May

19,637

129,148

153,722

June

29,211

156,422

166,868

July

25,774

162,993

170,891

August

57,110

160,564

181,128

September

67,625

210,081

217,232

October

486

72,587

136,361

227,723

November

9590

75,738

118,296

262,176

December

10,733

54,676

85,852

263,564

Total

20,809

471,122

1,539,063

2,318,511

The following table shows the number of hits for the Connexions Card website from July 2002.

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

January

15,693

48,245

138,640

194,567

February

20,048

51,304

121,197

167,071

March

26,449

52,997

144,670

April

46,629

107,461

153,708

May

25,262

133,000

129,960

June

36,721

133,900

129,542

July

13,163

37,936

115,762

133,345

August

15,418

24,801

110,674

120,611

September

18,474

19,753

126,316

161,331

October

29,436

31,289

123,526

180,643

November

19,365

41,208

192,238

172,527

December

14,121

51,491

90,156

124,452

Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills when she will reply to the letter dated 23 February 2006 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Dr. Arnandi Ramamudthy. [62437]

My apologies to the right hon. Member for the delay in responding to his letter. This was due to a technical systems problem with the Department's correspondence handling system. I replied to this letter on 19 April 2006.

Departmental Policies

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if she will set out with statistical evidence relating as closely as possible to West Lancashire constituency the effects in West Lancashire of changes to her Department's policies since 1997. [64235]

The West Lancashire constituency lies within Lancashire local authority. The most recent Key Stage 2 and GCSE and equivalent results showing information for pupils attending schools in West Lancashire are given in the following tables:

Key Stage 2 results of 11-year-old pupils attending schools in the West Lancashire constituency—Percentage of pupils gaining level 4 and above

1997

2005

Percentage point improvement 1997–2005

West Lancashire

English(9)

66

80

14

Maths(9)

70

77

7

National average

English(10)

63

79

16

Maths(10)

62

75

13

(9) Parliamentary constituency figures are based only on all maintained schools(including City Technology Colleges and, from 2003, Academies) and from 2000 onwards have been adjusted in respect of pupils recently arrived from overseas.

(10) England figures are based on all schools and have not been adjusted in respect of pupils recently arrived from overseas.

GCSE and equivalents results of 15-year-old pupils attending schools in the West Lancashire constituency—Percentage of15-year-olds gaining 5 + A*-C and 5 + A*-G(11) (12)

1997

2005

Percentage point improvement 1997–2005

West Lancashire

5 + A*-C

42.2

49.2

7.0

5 + A*-G

89.2

91.8

2.6

National average

5 + A*-C

45.1

56.3

11.2

5 + A*-G

86.4

89.0

2.6

(11) From 2004 results incorporate GCSEs, GNVQs and a wide range of other qualifications approved pre-16. Prior to 2004 results are based on GCSEs and GNVQs only.

(12) As standard the results reported relate to pupils aged 15 at the start of the academic year, i.e. 31 August, and therefore reaching the end of compulsory education at the end of the school year.

(13) Parliamentary constituency figures are based only on all maintained schools (including City Technology Colleges and, from 2003, Academies) and from 2000 onwards have been adjusted in respect of pupils recently arrived from overseas.

(14) England figures are based on all schools and have not been adjusted in respect of pupils recently arrived from overseas.

At national level, standards have improved across all key stages. The Primary and Secondary National Strategies, together with the measures we have taken to help schools in the toughest areas are continuing to deliver better results.

Further information by constituency, is provided within the Department's 'In Your Area' website available at http://www.dfes.gov.uk/inyourarea. Where information is not available at the constituency level it has been provided at local authority level.

This website allows users to access key facts and local information about education and skills based on postcodes. The data available within the site offers comparisons between 1997 and the latest available year and covers five geographies. These are parliamentary constituency, ward, local authority district, local authority and Government office region. England figures are also provided. The information available within the website is grouped in a number of broad categories including literacy and numeracy at age 11, literacy and numeracy at age 14, GCSE and equivalent results, pupils with special educational needs, school initiatives, school workforce, school funding and resources, children's social services, early years, class sizes, post-16, higher education and adult education.

Additional information could be provided only at disproportionate cost. However, my Department is investigating ways in which we can disseminate more information about the effects of our policies at a local level.

Education Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the average expenditure on education per pupil was in the (a) primary and (b) secondary sector in (i) Southend and (ii) Essex local education authority in each year since 1976. [64253]

The following tables contain the information requested:

Education expenditure per pupil, 1992–93 to 2004–05, cash terms figures as reported by local authorities as at 11 April 2006 -- £ per pupil(15) (16)

Essex local authority (pre local government reorganisation on 1 April 1998)(16)

School based expenditure per pupil(17)

Combined local authority and school based expenditure

per pupil(19)

Primary

Pre-primary

and primary

Secondary

Primary

Pre-primary

and primary

Secondary

1992–93

n/a

1,480

2,340

n/a

1,590

2,700

1993–94

n/a

1,690

2,410

n/a

1,780

2,790

1994–95

n/a

1,740

2,320

n/a

1,850

2,880

1995–96

n/a

1,760

2,340

n/a

1,910

2,870

1996–97

n/a

1,790

2,470

n/a

1,950

3,080

1997–98(21)

n/a

1,740

2,580

n/a

1,910

3,260

On the 1 April 1998 Essex local authority was reorganised and split into Essex, Southend and Thurrock local authorities. The unit costs for Essex and Southend local authorities are provided in the following table:

Essex local authority (post local government reorganisation) -- £ per pupil(16)

School based expenditure per pupil(17)(18) Combined local authority and school based expenditure per pupil(19)

Primary

Pre-primary

and primary

Secondary

Primary

Pre-primary

and primary

Secondary

1998–99(21)

n/a

1,950

2,690

n/a

2,140

3,330

1999–2000(22)

1,970

1,970

2,730

2,110

2,180

2,950

2000–01

2,240

2,250

2,860

2,390

2,460

3,090

2001–02

2,460

2,480

3,190

2,600

2,730

3,430

2002–03

2,570

n/a

3,270

n/a

n/a

n/a

2003–04

2,750

n/a

3,560

n/a

n/a

n/a

2004–05(23)

2,900

n/a

3,780

n/a

n/a

n/a

Southend local authority -- £ per pupil(16)

School based expenditure per pupil(17)(18) Combined local authority and school based expenditure per pupil(19)

Primary

Pre-primary

and primary

Secondary

Primary

Pre-primary

and primary

Secondary

1998–99(21)

n/a

1,870

2,580

n/a

2,000

3,210

1999–2000(22)

2,040

2,040

2,740

2,140

2,200

2,890

2000–01

2,220

2,230

2,980

2,320

2,410

3,150

2001–02

2,530

2,560

3,170

2,700

2,850

3,420

2002–03

2,590

n/a

3,370

n/a

n/a

n/a

2003–04

2,730

n/a

3,700

n/a

n/a

n/a

2004–05(23)

2,860

n/a

3,810

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a=Figures are not available.

(15) The expenditure data to 1998–99 are drawn from the annual 'RO1' spending returns which local authorities submitted to the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions (now the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister). Figures for 1999–00 to 2001–02 are drawn from Section 52 (Table 3) Outturn statements which local authorities submitted to the DfES. Figures for 2002–03 onwards are taken from the recasted Section 52 (Table A) Outturn statements. The change in sources is shown by the blank rows.

(16) Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) took place on the 1 April 1998. What was previously defined as Essex local authority pre LGR was split into Essex, Southend and Thurrock local authorities for the start of the 1998–99 financial year.

(17) School based expenditure includes only expenditure incurred directly by local authority schools. This includes the pay of teachers and school-based support staff, school premises costs, books and equipment, and certain other supplies and services, less any capital items funded from recurrent spending and income from sales, fees and charges and rents and rates. This excludes the central cost of support services such as home to school transport, local authority administration and the financing of capital expenditure. The pupil data are drawn from the DfES Annual Schools Census adjusted to be on a financial year basis.

(18) From 2002–03 the school based expenditure calculation is broadly similar to the calculation in previous years. However, 2001–02 and earlier years includes all premature retirement compensation (PRC) and Crombie payments, mandatory PRC payments and other indirect employee expenses, while from 2002–03 only the schools element of these categories is included. In 2001–02 this accounted for approximately £70 per pupil of the England total, while the schools element of these categories accounted for approximately £50 per pupil of the England total in 2002–03. Also, for some LAs, expenditure that had previously been attributed to the school sectors was reported within the LA part of the form from 2002–03 and would therefore be excluded, though this is not quantifiable from existing sources.

(19) Combined local authority and school based expenditure includes all expenditure on the education of children in local authority maintained establishments and pupils educated by the authority other than in maintained establishments. This includes both school based expenditure and all elements of central LA expenditure except youth and community and capital expenditure from revenue (CERA). From 2002–03 onwards, certain elements of central local authority expenditure cannot be attributed to a particular phase of education and consequently a sector breakdown is no longer available. Pupil figures include all pre-primary pupils, including those under 5s funded by the authority and being educated in private settings (only available from 1999–00), pupils educated in maintained mainstream schools and any other local authority maintained pupils. All pupil numbers are adjusted to be on a financial year basis.

(20) Expenditure was not distinguished between the pre-primary and primary sectors until the inception of Section 52 for financial year 1999–00.

(21) Spending in 1997–98 reflects the transfer of monies from local government to central government for the nursery vouchers scheme. These were returned to local government from 1998–99.

(22) The expenditure data for 1999–00 onwards reflect the return of grant maintained schools to local authority maintenance.

(23) 2004–05 data is subject to change by the local authority.

Note:

Figures are rounded to the nearest £10.

GCSEs

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what percentage of pupils achieved (a) one or more A* to C, (b) five or more A* to C and (c) five or more A* to G grades at GCSE in (i) England, (ii) Somerset and (iii) Taunton constituency in each year since 1997. [64349]

The following table shows the percentage of pupils achieving one or more A* to G grades and one or more A* to C grades. Constituency level figures for pupils achieving one or more A* to C grades at GCSE can be provided only at a disproportionate cost.

Percentage of 15-year-old pupils achieving one or more GCSEs or equivalents at the grades listed(24) (25)

A*to G A*to C

England(26)

Somerset local authority(27)

Taunton constituency4, 5

England(26)

Somerset local authority(27)

Taunton constituency

1997

92.3

95.9

95.8

70.5

75.5

n/a

1998

93.4

96.7

97.2

71.4

77.1

n/a

1999

94.0

96.9

97.5

72.6

78.0

n/a

2000

94.4

96.8

96.6

73.6

79.0

n/a

2001

94.5

97.2

97.2

74.0

79.1

n/a

2002

94.6

97.3

98.6

75.2

79.0

n/a

2003

94.8

96.0

96.9

75.6

79.2

n/a

2004

95.9

96.0

95.8

75.8

71 .8

n/a

2005

96.4

96.9

97.1

77.5

71.6

n/a

(24) Aged 15 at the start of the academic year (i.e. 31 August).

(25) From 1997 includes GNVQ equivalences and from 2004 all other equivalences approved for use pre 16.

(26) England figures include all schools, including independent schools, hospital schools and PRUs.

(27) LA and constituency level figures only cover maintained schools.

(28) Pupils attending schools located in Taunton constituency.

The following table shows the percentage of pupils achieving five or more A* to G grades and five or more A* to C grades.

Percentage of 15-year-old pupils achieving five or more GCSEs or equivalents at the grades listed(29) (30)

A*to G A*to C

England(31)

Somerset local authority(32)

Taunton constituency(32)(33)

England(31)

Somerset local authority(32)

Taunton constituency(32)(33)

1997

86.4

92.5

91.2

45.1

48.9

46.1

1998

87.5

92.3

89.7

46.3

51.2

49.4

1999

88.5

93.7

93.4

47.9

52.7

51.6

2000

88.9

93.4

91.8

49.2

55.3

55.0

2001

88.9

93.0

90.7

50.0

54.7

57.6

2002

88.9

92.7

94.1

51.6

54.8

58.8

2003

88.8

90.3

89.5

52.9

54.9

59.3

2004

88.8

90.1

89.2

53.7

56.4

58.3

2005

89.0

91.0

90.5

56.3

56.5

61.2

(29) Aged 15 at the start of the academic year (i.e. 31 August).

(30) From 1997 includes GNVQ equivalences and from 2004 all other equivalences approved for use pre 16.

(31) England figures include all schools, including independent schools, hospital schools and PRUs.

(32) LA and constituency level figures only cover maintained schools.

(33) Pupils attending schools located in Taunton constituency.

Higher Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many people under the age of 30 were participating in higher education in each year since 1995; how many are expected to do so in each year to 2015; and what these figures represent as a proportion of the relevant age cohort. [62728]

The Higher Education Initial Participation Rate (HEIPR) is the measure that the Department uses to assess progress in participation. The HEIPR time series is available for 1999/2000 to 2004/05 and is shown in the following table.

HEIPR for English-domiciled first time participants in HE courses at UK higher education institutions and English further education colleges 1999/2000 to 2004/05

Academic year

1999/2000

2000/01

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

2004/05(34)

HEIPR (Percentage)

41

42

42

43

42

42

Initial entrants (Thousand)

246

249

255

268

269

271

(34) Provisional.

Source:

Statistical First Release 14/2006: Participation Rates in Higher Education: Academic Years 1999/2000 to 2004/2005 (provisional).

The Department's expenditure plans allow for a continuing increase in HEIPR in the period to 2007–08, but we do not publish forecasts for individual years as these depend on the Spending Review settlements.

Our target remains to make progress towards a 50 per cent. participation rate by 2010, and we believe that progress will be made. There are a number of things that will help including continuing progress in attainment at age 18; the opening up of vocational routes into higher education, and the closer co-operation between universities and further education colleges we signalled in the recent FE White Paper; the new "train to gain" projects for employer-led higher education, and a continuing expansion of foundation degrees; and the package of support for part-time study that we announced last autumn.

House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills whether any (a) employee of her Department, (b) person engaged by her Department as a consultant and (c) paid adviser to her Department is a member of the House of Lords; and if she will make a statement. [52892]

The Department does not employ any member of the House of Lords directly. Information about consultants and advisors to the Department is not collected centrally and can be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Pathfinder Schools

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills

(1) what resources have been allocated to support Pathfinder schools in each of the next five years; [50252]

(2) how much has been awarded to Pathfinder schools in each of the past two years, broken down by local authority. [50253]

The following table shows for each local authority the amount of money allocated to pathfinder projects in schools in the last two years. The figures shown for Building Schools for the Future pathfinder schools for 2005–06 are the amounts notified to local authorities and schools, but will be spent over the next three years. Information on resources for other Pathfinder schools over the next five years is not currently available.

Funding for Pathfinder schools 2004–05 and 2005–06 -- £

2005–06

Local authority

Enterprise learning pathfinders

Key stage 2

language pathfinders

Diversity

pathfinders

Total

2004–05

Building schools for the future pathfinder projects

Greenwich

130,000

0

0

130,000

213,025,000(35)

Hackney

185,000

0

0

185,000

Hammersmith

18,000

0

0

18,000

Lambeth

15,000

0

0

15,000

Lewisham

10,200

0

0

10,200

98,985,000(36)

Tower Hamlets

210,500

0

0

210,500

Wandsworth

75,000

0

0

75,000

Westminster

67,828

0

0

67,828

Barking

0

88,150

0

88,150

Barnet

38,000

0

0

38,000

Bexley

3,500

0

0

3,500

Brent

36,200

0

0

36,200

Bromley

116,571

0

0

116,571

Croydon

50,000

0

0

50,000

Enfield

0

100,000

0

100,000

Haringey

72,000

0

0

72,000

Havering

11,000

0

0

11,000

Hounslow

110,940

0

0

110,940

Merton

24,000

0

0

24,000

Newham

64,500

0

0

64,500

Redbridge

63,400

0

0

63,400

Richmond upon Thames

0

159,165

0

159,165

Birmingham

150,000

96,400

0

246,400

Coventry

35,720

86,000

0

121,720

Dudley

92,904

0

0

92,904

Solihull

46,024

0

0

46,024

Walsall

24,300

0

0

24,300

Knowsley

223,310

48,351

0

271,661

Liverpool

59,900

0

0

59,900

St. Helens

146,000

0

0

146,000

Sefton

23,000

0

0

23,000

Bury

390,500

67,180

0

457,680

Manchester

90,000

0

0

90,000

Oldham

0

122,500

0

122,500

Rochdale

25,000

0

0

25,000

Trafford

69,600

0

0

69,600

Wigan

67,100

0

0

67,100

Barnsley

20,000

0

0

20,000

Doncaster

34,200

0

0

34,200

Rotherham

94,000

0

0

94,000

Sheffield

8,820

0

0

8,820

Bradford

112,500

0

0

112,500

116,873,000(37)

Calderdale

47,500

0

0

47,500

Leeds

18,375

0

0

18,375

Wakefield

41,335

0

0

41,335

Newcastle upon Tyne

25,000

0

0

25,000

North Tyneside

63,160

80,354

110,000

253,514

South Tyneside

168,000

0

0

168,000

Bath and NE Somerset

40,500

0

0

40,500

City of Bristol

59,000

0

0

59,000

158,298,000(38)

North Somerset

46,500

0

0

46,500

Hartlepool

22,000

0

0

22,000

Middlesbrough

5,000

0

0

5,000

Stockton-on-Tees

40,150

0

0

40,150

Kingston-upon-Hull

76,770

0

0

76,770

East Riding of Yorkshire

0

63,227

0

63,227

North Yorkshire

52,000

0

0

52,000

York

33,500

0

0

33,500

Bedfordshire

30,000

0

0

30,000

Derbyshire

401,145

0

0

401,145

Bournemouth

19,850

0

0

19,850

Durham

157,000

0

0

157,000

Darlington

32,500

0

0

32,500

East Sussex

12,900

0

0

12,900

Brighton and Hove

57,111

141,587

0

198,698

Hampshire

327,550

106,763

0

434,313

Portsmouth

70,000

0

92,250

162,250

Leicestershire

123,500

0

0

123,500

Stoke-on-Trent

40,000

0

0

40,000

Wiltshire

91,490

0

0

91,490

Swindon

4,000

0

0

4,000

Slough

40,000

0

0

40,000

Wokingham

23,000

0

0

23,000

Cambridgeshire

37,448

0

0

37,448

Peterborough

392,800

0

0

392,800

Cheshire

32,070

0

0

32,070

Halton

150,000

0

0

150,000

Warrington

29,000

0

0

29,000

Plymouth

42,000

0

0

42,000

Essex

448,821

0

0

448,821

Southend-on-Sea

159,792

0

0

159,792

Thurrock

51,900

0

0

51,900

Worcestershire

40,100

0

0

40,100

Kent

161,025

0

0

161,025

Lancashire

126,817

132,216

0

259,033

Blackburn with Darwen

50,300

0

0

50,300

Blackpool

33,144

0

0

33,144

Nottinghamshire

110,481

98,500

0

208,981

Nottingham City

185,500

0

0

185,500

Telford and Wrekin

115,000

0

0

115,000

Cornwall

420,500

0

0

420,500

Cumbria

159,000

0

0

159,000

Gloucestershire

20,425

0

0

20,425

Hertfordshire

148,100

0

0

148,100

Lincolnshire

168,840

0

0

168,840

Norfolk

13,500

0

0

13,500

Northamptonshire

21,178

0

0

21,178

Northumberland

304,010

0

0

304,010

Oxfordshire

9,500

0

0

9,500

Somerset

105,400

0

0

105,400

Suffolk

265,000

0

0

265,000

Surrey

5,000

0

0

5,000

Warwickshire

154,994

0

0

154,994

West Sussex

20,350

0

0

20,350

Total

9,165,348

1,390,393

202,250

10,757,991

587,181,000

(35) Includes £116 million Private Finance Initiative credits.

(36) Includes £58 million Private Finance Initiative credits.

(37) Includes £110 million Private Finance Initiative credits.

(38) Includes £151 million Private Finance Initiative credits.

School Performance Tables

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills

(1) when it was decided to remove the schools performance tables for the years prior to 2001 from her Department's website; [64273]

(2) if she will restore the performance tables for the years prior to 2001 to her Department's website; [64274]

(3) for what reasons the schools' performance tables for the years prior to 2001 were removed from her Department's website. [64275]

It has not been possible to access the Achievement and Attainment Tables prior to 2001 from the Department's website because of a technical problem. In the interim anyone wishing to obtain the data can do so by contacting the Public Enquiry Unit. However, we expect the Tables prior to 2001 to be made available on the website again by mid May.

School Trusts

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills whether the liability for paying contractors will remain with the local education authority in cases where schools becoming trusts are part of private finance initiative schemes. [64254]

Yes. It is the local authority which signs the contract with the private sector PFI contractor and which therefore is liable for the payment of the unitary charge for the length of the contract. Schools will remain liable for the agreements they have made with the authority for contributing to the unitary charge. The governing body of each school included in a PFI contract must sign such an agreement before the PFI contract' can be signed. This commitment does not change if the school changes status.

Schools (Southend, West)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of children attending schools in Southend West constituency come from outside the borough; and how many children who live in Southend West constituency attend a school in another local authority area. [64366]

The information requested has been provided in the following table:

Movement of pupils in Southend West constituency and Southend-on-Sea local authority(42)

Number of pupils attending schools in Southend West constituency

Number of pupils attending schools in Southend West constituency who reside outside of Southend-on-Sea LA

Percentage of pupils attending schools in Southend West Constituency who reside outside of Southend-on-Sea LA

Number of pupils residing within Southend West constituency

Number of pupils residing within Southend West constituency who attend schools outside of Southend-on-Sea LA

Percentage of pupils residing within Southend West constituency who attend schools outside of Southend-on-Sea LA

Primary(39)

5,064

166

3.3

5,681

171

3.0

Secondary(40)

5,797

1,306

22.5

4,807

992

20.6

Special(41)

321

69

21.5

121

15

12.4

Total

11,182

1,541

13.8

10,609

1,178

11.1

(39) Includes middle deemed primary

(40) Includes secondary and middle deemed secondary.

(41) Includes special and non-maintained special.

(42) Includes pupils aged 5 to 15 years, solely registered or main registration of dually registered pupils, excludes boarders

Source:

Annual Schools Census 2005

Secondary Transfer Appeals

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many and what percentage of secondary transfer appeals were (a) lodged, (b) heard and (c) successful in (i) inner London, (ii) each outer London borough and (iii) England in 2004–05. [64088]

The latest available information on appeals lodged by parents against non-admission of their children to maintained Secondary schools is shown in the table. Information on appeals relating to 2004–05 will be available in June.

Appeals lodged by parents against non-admission of their children to maintained secondary schools 2003/04, by local education authority and Government Office Region in England

Secondary

Appeals heard

Appeals decided in

parents' favour

Number of schools admissions(43)

Admission appeals lodged by parents(44)

Number

Percentage(45)

Number

Percentage(46)

England

688,020

64,940

46,240

71

16,260

35

London

90,120

12,690

9,040

71

1,400

15

Inner London

28,560

4,110

3,220

78

420

13

202

Camden

2,140

230

120

51

10

10

201

City of London

(47)

(47)

(47)

(47)

(47)

(47)

204

Hackney

1,660

250

200

80

50

23

205

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,360

210

190

91

10

3

309

Haringey

2,500

250

110

45

20

19

206

Islington

1,880

220

130

59

30

20

207

Kensington and Chelsea

800

110

90

86

10

10

208

Lambeth

1,870

170

150

85

20

12

209

Lewisham

2,500

610

480

79

80

16

316

Newham

4,040

1,010

900

89

120

13

210

Southwark

2,130

260

210

81

30

15

211

Tower Hamlets

3,380

160

130

83

30

21

212

Wandsworth

2,400

290

210

74

20

8

213

Westminster

1,910

350

310

88

10

3

Outer London

61,560

8,590

5,820

68

980

17

301

Barking and Dagenham

2,460

570

350

61

60

16

302

Barnet

4,270

860

570

67

140

24

303

Bexley

3,710

500

350

71

90

25

304

Brent

3,300

280

230

83

20

7

305

Bromley

4,090

410

180

44

20

9

306

Croydon

4,310

380

280

74

60

20

307

Ealing

3,200

520

400

78

60

15

308

Enfield

4,400

1,110

650

59

110

17

203

Greenwich

3,350

560

350

63

80

23

310

Harrow

2,390

230

150

66

20

12

311

Havering

3,340

610

470

77

80

17

312

Hillingdon

3,960

240

140

57

20

13

313

Hounslow

3,470

610

300

49

30

10

314

Kingston upon Thames

1,960

180

150

86

20

12

315

Merton

1,930

170

90

52

30

29

317

Redbridge

4,080

370

360

98

60

16

318

Richmond upon Thames

1,650

270

200

74

40

21

319

Sutton

3,050

340

230

68

30

13

320

Waltham Forest

2,640

400

370

91

40

11

(43) Includes all pupils, irrespective of age, who joined a school at any time during September to January of the relevant academic year.

(44) Findings from a consultation indicate that the total number of appeals lodged by parents against non-admission of their children could be misleading. Some appeals are resolved before they reach a panel hearing (a place at an alternative school is accepted after an appeal has been lodged; the same parent can lodge appeals for more than one school but will not pursue them all). The number of appeals heard by an appeal panel is deemed to be the more reliable and critical indicator.

(45) Number of appeals heard by a panel expressed as a percentage of the number of appeals lodged by parents.

(46) Number of appeals decided in favour of the parents expressed as a percentage of the number of appeals heard by a panel.

(47) Not applicable. No schools of this type.

Note:

Numbers have been rounded to the nearest 10. There may be discrepancies between the sum of constituent items and totals as shown.

Source:

Annual Schools Census

Student Plagiarism

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many cases of serious plagiarism by under-graduate and post-graduate students were reported in the latest academic year for which data are available, broken down by university; and how many students had their degree consequently (a) withheld and (b) withdrawn. [64929]

This information is not held centrally. We recognise that plagiarism is a serious matter but higher education institutions as autonomous bodies are responsible for detecting plagiarism and determining what disciplinary action to take. The Quality Assurance Agency's Code of Practice and the Joint Information Systems Committee provide advice and guidance to institutions on dealing with this issue.

Truancy

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills

(1) what assessment she has made of truancy levels in schools in (a) Hull North constituency, (b) Kingston upon Hull and (c) England; [64099]

(2) how many hours of school were missed due to truancy in each academic year between 1997 and 2005 in (a) Hull North constituency, (b) Kingston upon Hull and (c) England. [64101]

The Department does not hold data on the number of hours of school missed due to truancy or the levels of truancy. In 2005, the proportion of half day sessions missed due to unauthorised absence (of which truancy forms a part) in maintained primary schools in Kingston upon Hull North Constituency was 0.60 per cent. and for maintained secondary schools 1.31 per cent. For Kingston upon Hull local authority 0.57 per cent. of half days were missed in primary schools and 2.78 per cent. in secondary schools. The comparative figures for England were 0.43 per cent. for primary schools and 1.23 per cent. for secondary schools. In September 2005, the Government announced a drive against pupils with high unauthorised absences in 146 secondary schools which account for 1 in 5 of all instances of unauthorised absence across the country. We have now extended this to cover 198 secondary schools and an estimated 13,000 pupils. This drive will provide an intensive package of support and challenge to these pupils and their families.

University Principals

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills whether (a) the Government or (b) any of its agencies have power to direct the governing body of (i) a university to dismiss a vice-chancellor or (ii) a college of higher education to dismiss a principal. [64462]

All universities and colleges of higher education are legally independent corporate bodies. Therefore, neither the Government nor any of its agencies have the power to direct the governing body of such an institution in any of its internal affairs, including dismissal of staff.

Youth Opportunity Fund

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what estimate she has made of the resources to be made available to West Lancashire District Council under her Youth Opportunity Fund initiative. [64227]

The Youth Opportunity Fund (YOF) and the Youth Capital Fund (YCF), which was also announced in the 'Youth Green Paper: Youth Matters', were allocated to local authorities from April 2006. The funds are designed to enable local authorities to develop new approaches to strategic investment in youth facilities, particularly in deprived neighbourhoods. Extra resource was made available for the YOF and YCF in the Chancellor's pre-Budget report in December 2005. A total of £115 million is available for both funds over 2006–08.

The allocation for both funds for Lancashire local authority is £657,899 a year for two years for the Youth Opportunity Fund and £569,031 a year for two years for the Youth Capital Fund. The funds are ring fenced and can only be spent on activities and facilities that young people want.

Each local authority is responsible for disseminating the funds within in its area. Therefore, I am unable to provide information about the amounts allocated below local authority level to show the funding for West Lancashire district council.

Deputy Prime Minister

Carbon Dioxide Emissions

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what estimate his Department has made of the carbon dioxide emissions resulting from (a) new house-building and (b) the retrofitting and reuse of buildings; and if he will make a statement. [55797]

holding answer 3 March 2006

In support of the Government response to the Barker Review of Housing Supply, the department has carried out Sustainability Impact Study. This study includes an assessment of the embodied energy associated with new house building and of the energy used within new homes. A report of the findings of this study was published in December 2005 and is available on the ODPM website.

The BRE's Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) can be used to rate the environmental impact of building materials used and to assess the amount of carbon dioxide emitted in use for new and refurbished buildings.

Council Tax

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many properties in (a) Guildford, (b) Waverley and (c) Surrey are eligible for a 50 per cent. council tax rebate. [64352]

There were 30 properties in Guildford, 115 properties in Waverley and a total of 1,901 properties in the 11 local authorities in Surrey that were eligible for a 50 per cent. council tax discount as at 19 September 2005.

The figures are as reported by local authorities to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister on the CTB1 and CTB1(S) forms.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the (a) average and (b) band D council tax was in each local authority in Yorkshire in (i) 2002–03 and (ii) 2006–07. [64319]

Details of the council tax levels in each local authority in Yorkshire in 2002–03 and 2006–07 are published on the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's website. The details can be found under "Information For Taxpayers" at "Council Taxes" at: http://www.local.odpm.gov.uk/finance/ct.htm. This includes the average council tax per property and the average band D council tax.

Haven Gateway

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what percentage of the total amount of public money spent on the Haven Gateway Partnership up to 31 March 2006 was spent on (a) direct and indirect salaries, (b) public relations and communications, (c) capital infrastructure and (d) consultancy fees; and how much public funding has been allocated to the Partnership to 31 March 2006. [64265]

I have been asked to reply.

Since its formation in May 2001 until 31 March 2006, the Haven Gateway Partnership has, received £1.641 million of funding to support its role as a Sub Regional Economic Partnership. As a percentage of this funding the expenditure breakdown is as follows: 20.5 per cent. on salaries, 18.4 per cent. on public relations and communications, 32.3 per cent. on capital infrastructure and 2.8 per cent. On consultancy fees.

Housing Act

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister

(1) if he will make a statement on the role of NowMedical in determining the vulnerability of those applying as homeless under part VII of the Housing Act 1996; [32540]

(2) whether the Homelessness and Housing Support Directorate has encouraged local authorities to use NowMedical to determine the vulnerability of those applying as homeless under part VII of the Housing Act 1996; [32541]

(3) if he will commission research into the accuracy of decisions being made by private companies providing paper-based assessments of the vulnerability of homeless applicants. [32542]

It is for local housing authorities to satisfy themselves whether individual housing applicants may be owed a duty under part 7 of the Housing Act 1997, and, if so which duty. As part of this, they will need to decide whether an applicant who is eligible for assistance has a priority need for accommodation. In cases where the applicant may have a priority need because of vulnerability due to a medical condition, the authority, may wish to seek a specialist medical opinion to help inform their decision, and should have regard to any medical or social services advice obtained. We have no plans to commission research into the accuracy of such advice at present.

Officials in the Homelessness and Housing Support Directorate work with local authorities to encourage good practice on preventing and administering homelessness. This includes sharing information on a wide range of specialist advisory services which other authorities have found useful. In providing this factual information, officials are advised to avoid making recommendations of any kind, and to stress that it is for authorities to decide which services to use and which providers to employ. Where an authority seeks specialist advice from any organisation to assist in making such decisions, they will need to satisfy themselves that the advice is soundly-based and reliable. Whatever advice is received the ultimate decision on vulnerability must rest with the local authority.

Applicants have the right to request an authority to review certain decisions, including a decision that the applicant does not have priority need because he or she is not vulnerable. If they are dissatisfied with a decision on review (or a review decision is not made within the prescribed time scale) they have the right to appeal to the county court on a point of law.

Housing

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the capital receipts from the sale of local authority housing stock in Tamworth were in each of the last 10 years; and what proportion of this income was (a) received by the borough council and (b) passed to his Department. [42075]

Capital receipts from the sale of local authority housing stock, as reported by Tamworth are tabled immediately as follows. The receipts are net of discounts and are from Right to Buy and other sales to sitting tenants and owner occupiers.

Local authority housing capital receipts; Tamworth

Financial year

Capital receipt (£)

1995–96

1,255,000

1996–97

1,398,000

1997–98

2,894,000

1998–99

1,972,000

1999–2000

3,160,000

2000–01

2,640,000

2001–02

4,176,000

2002–03

7,586,000

2003–04

10,333,000

2004–05

7,055,000

Source:

P1AB returns from local authority to ODPM

Until 1 April 2004, with-debt local authorities were required to set-aside a proportion of their total housing receipts for repayment of debt. The amount of total housing receipts for both dwelling and non-dwelling disposals is given in the following table, along with the amount set-aside from those housing receipts. In April 2004 the set-aside regime was replaced by pooling in order to address the fact that the distribution of receipts was widely unequal across the country. Neither set-aside or pooling separately identify the amount set-aside or pooled from specific types of receipt.

Financial year

Housing capital receipts (£000)

Set-aside/pooled

(£000)

Percentage set-aside/pooled

1995–96

1,367

1,008

74

1996–97

1,489

1,103

69

1997–98

4,264

2,197

52

1998–99

1,999

1,486

74

1999–2000

3,151

2,352

75

2000–01

2,629

1,951

74

2001–02

4,357

3,184

73

2002–03

7,600

11,951

26

2003–04

10,343

(48)

n/a

2004–05

7,106

5,230

74

(48) No data

The proportion of the housing capital receipt that a local authority retains is not simply the gross receipt less the set-aside or pooling liability. Local authorities may reduce the value of the capital receipt by, for instance, the cost of the administration fees involved in the disposal of the asset or other costs, for instance improvements to the asset in the preceding years, before calculating their set-aside or pooling obligation. Hence in the table above the amount retained will not be gross receipts less set-aside or pooled amount but rather gross receipts less deductions (for which we have no data) less set-aside or pooling obligations.

Since 1997 the Government have consistently invested more in housing than they have received in pooled receipts. In 2004–05 the amount paid to Government from all housing receipts (not just Right to Buy) was £1.7 billion. The amount invested in housing was £4.1 billion ie almost two and a half times the amount received in receipts. The ratio is expected to increase substantially in the future.

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will list the capital receipts from the sale of local authority housing stock in Islington for each of the last 10 years; and what proportion of the income was (a) received by the borough council and (b) posted to his Department. [39924]

Capital receipts from the sale of local authority stock, as reported by Islington are tabled as follows. The receipts are net of discounts and are from Right to Buy and other sales to sitting tenants and owner occupiers.

Capital receipts: Islington

Financial year

Capital receipt (£)

1996–97

8,006,000

1997–98

10,723,000

1998–99

12,522,000

1999–2000

n/a

2000–01

n/a

2001–02

45,619,000

2002–03

48,362,000

2003–04

52,350,000

2004–05

n/a

n/a=not available

Source:

P1AB returns from local authority to ODPM

Until 1 April 2004, with-debt local authorities were required to set-aside a proportion of their total housing receipts for repayment of debt. The amount of total housing receipts for both dwelling and non-dwelling disposals is given in the following table, along with the amount set-aside from those housing receipts. In April 2004 the set-aside regime was replaced by pooling in order to address the wide inequality in receipts between areas. Neither set-aside or pooling separately identify the amount set-aside or pooled from specific types of receipt.

Financial year

Housing capital receipts (£000)

Set-aside/pooled

(£000)

Percentage set-aside/pooled

1996–97

10,375

7,062

68

1997–98

14,339

10,084

70

1998–99

21,717

12,606

58

1999–2000

34,519

22,427

65

2000–01

47,900

29,598

62

2001–02

63,775

36,930

58

2002–03

68,730

29,598

43

2003–04

80,202

(49)

n/a

2004–05

90,560

48,316

54

(49) No data

The proportion of the housing capital receipt that a local authority retains is not simply the gross receipt less the set-aside or pooling liability. Local authorities may reduce the value of the capital receipt by, for instance, the cost of the administration fees involved in the disposal of the asset or other costs, for instance improvements to the asset in the preceding years, before calculating their set-aside or pooling obligation. Hence in the table above the amount retained will not be gross receipts less set-aside or pooled amount but rather gross receipts less deductions (for which we have no data) less set-aside or pooling obligations.

Since 1997 the Government have consistently invested more in housing than they have received in housing receipts. In 2004–05 the amount paid to Government from all housing receipts (not just Right to Buy) was £1.7 billion. The amount invested in housing was £4.1 billion ie almost two and a half times the amount received. The ratio of amount invested to amount received is expected to increase substantially in the future.

Parliamentary Questions

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister when he will reply to Question (a) 32540, (b) 32541 and (c) 32542 from the hon. Member for Norwich, North tabled on 23 November 2005. [49230]

Planning Inspectorate

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will make it the policy of the Government that there should be a public and open register of the qualifications, experience and training of members of the Planning Inspectorate. [62852]

holding answer 18 April 2006

Although not currently made available in a register or list, the Inspectorate provides details of individual Planning Inspectors' qualifications and previous experience when requested. Following an analysis of requests received under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Inspectorate is considering how best to make more information about Inspector recruitment, relevant qualifications and training and the decision-making process more widely available.

There are no plans to publish details of the qualifications, experience or training of the Inspectorate's administrative staff.

Regional Government

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what powers county councils have to hold a local referendum on a local issue across the county area; and which tier of government would pay for the cost of the referendum. [62293]

Any local authority may hold a consultative referendum on matters relating to services provided in pursuance of the authority's functions, expenditure on such services, or any other matter which relates to the authority's power to promote the well-being of its area.

The tier of local government which holds a referendum would meet the cost of that referendum.

Constitutional Affairs

Electoral Reform

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what options she is considering for the introduction of (a) electronic and (b) internet-based measures to reform the electoral process, broken down by stage of the electoral process; and if she will make a statement. [53886]

We are considering how modern technology can be used to support and develop the electoral process. This could include registration, voting itself and the counting of ballots. Pilots to occur at the May 2006 local elections will include e-counting and the use of electronic electoral registers to support our investigation of how such technology might be employed in the future. Information Technology may also be valuable in providing information to voters during an election period and between elections to promote and facilitate democratic engagement and participation.

Home Department

Car-jacking

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will introduce legislation to provide for the specific offence of car-jacking; and if he will make a statement. [64213]

The Government have no plans to introduce a specific offence of car-jacking. We are satisfied that car-jacking would inevitably involve the commission of one or more serious criminal offences. The exact charge would depend on the circumstances of the particular case, but the following offences are relevant:

Robbery contrary to section eight of the Theft Act 1968, for which the maximum custodial sentence is life imprisonment.

Taking a conveyance without authority contrary to section 12 of the Theft Act 1968, for which the maximum custodial sentence is six months.

Aggravated Vehicle Taking contrary to section 12A of the Theft Act 1968, for which the maximum custodial sentence is two years, or 14 years where a death occurs.

Kidnapping, a common law offence for which there is no limit fixed for the period of imprisonment.

Chewing Gum

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many fines have been issued to the public by the police for chewing-gum related offences in 2006; and how many were issued in the last 10 years. [63098]

Chewing-gum related offences are classified as littering offences and Fixed Penalty Notices are issued by local authority officials. Records of Fixed Penalty Notices issued to the public by local authority officials for littering offences are not notified to the Home Office.

Counter-terrorism (Canary Wharf)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what (a) operations and (b) investigations (i) were undertaken and (ii) are being conducted related to the alleged attempted attack on Canary Wharf on 23 November 2004. [64387]

It is our policy not to comment on the details of alleged attempted terrorist attacks in the UK. These are operational matters for the police service.

DNA Database

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department for what percentage of the population of West Lancashire the police hold a record on their DNA database. [64121]

It is not possible to provide the information requested for West Lancashire as the DNA subject sample records held on the National DNA Database (NDNAD) relate to police force area, not local authority area, but some data is available for Lancashire. Data from Census 2001 indicates that the population of Lancashire is 1,134,976. At the end of February 2006, there were 90,405 individuals with a profile on the NDNAD taken by Lancashire police.

These individuals would have been arrested, detained in a police station and had a DNA sample taken in Lancashire, but would not necessarily be resident in Lancashire. Using the previous figures, the percentage of persons who have a profile on the NDNAD taken by Lancashire police relative to the population of Lancashire is 7.9 per cent.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the merits of establishing an independent body, with ethical and lay input, to oversee the working of the National DNA Database; and if he will make a statement. [64173]

The Government recognises the need for, and is committed to establishing, arrangements for ethical review of the policy and decision-making of the National DNA Database Board through an ethics committee. The Government believe that independent ethical advice and input is necessary to ensure that appropriate account of a wide set of views, and protection of individual rights, is retained in the decision-making of the Board.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people have samples on the National DNA Database who have not been (a) charged with and (b) convicted of an offence. [59533]

Data are not readily available on the number of persons who have a DNA profile on the database who have been charged with, convicted of or acquitted of an offence. This data are not held on the National DNA Database (NDNAD), but can be obtained from the Police National Computer (PNC). There is an electronic link between PNC and the NDNAD which transmits certain information only. Home Office officials are working with colleagues in the Police Information and Technology Organisation (PITO) which is responsible for PNC and with police service staff to develop a process to routinely report this and other statistical information that is held on either NDNAD or PNC. This work is under way and I will write to the hon. Member as soon as the work has been completed.

Graffiti Removal Notices

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many graffiti removal notices have been issued in England since 2003. [64057]

Section 48–52 of the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003 which introduced Defacement Removal Notices nationwide came into force on 6 April 2006. Since the 6 April the Home Office has not received any details of Defacement Removal Notices being issued.

Identity Cards

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make it his policy to provide the Information Commissioner with comprehensive powers to check the data protection compliance of the National Identity Card Scheme. [62560]

The Identity and Passport Service complies with the Data Protection Act, and this will continue once ID cards are issued, and the register is operational. The Information Commissioner is already responsible for ensuring compliance with the Data Protection Act, and he will continue to exercise this function in respect of the Identity and Passport Service. The Information Commissioner therefore has the power to ensure that the Identity Card Scheme complies with the Data Protection Act, and does not require further powers in order to carry out this function.

Indefinite Leave to Remain

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many applications for indefinite leave to remain under the provisions of the European Community Association Agreement there have been since February 2005; and how many have been completed. [64046]

holding answer 18 April 2006

Since February 2005, IND has received 2,577 applications for indefinite leave to remain under the European Community Association Agreements. Following resumption of consideration of this ECAA category on 14 February 2005, some 850 have been completed of which 109 relate to applications received since February 2005. This information is provisional management information and may be subject to change.

Inmate Repatriations

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department

(1) if he will list the (a) occasions, (b) destinations, (c) prisons and (d) prison governor grade staff who have replaced prison officer grades in accompanying inmate repatriations outside the United Kingdom in each of the last five years; [63352]

(2) for what reasons and in what circumstances prison governor grade staff would accompany inmate repatriations outside the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement. [63353]

The information is only available for the last two years since the creation of a dedicated repatriation group. In the last two years four governor grades have been involved in travelling abroad to escort repatriated prisoners back to the United Kingdom. One governor travelled to Japan, two to Australia, and one to Antigua making three occasions. All were governor grades from Wandsworth, which is the prison dedicated to repatriation cases. All occasions were in 2004–05.

These cases represent only a small percentage of the total number of repatriations.

The governor at Wandsworth operates the policy that governor grades should take part in repatriations only when there is an overriding operational reason to do so.

Motoring Offences

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what estimate he has made of the number of (a) males and (b) females who have received a fixed penalty for committing an offence under Section 14(3) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (a) once, (b) twice, (c) three times and (d) four times and over; and if he will make a statement. [64024]

National Offender Management Service

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the lines of accountability are under the National Offender Management Service in Wales for the delivery of the reducing reoffending action plan. [49058]

The reducing reoffending action plan applies to England but the principles and broad approach to reducing reoffending is taken into account in 'Joining Together in Wales: an Adult and Young People's Strategy to Reduce Re-offending'. The strategy was published jointly between the Welsh Assembly Government and the Home Office and, following the outcome of the consultation, there will be a joint action plan to reflect the roles and responsibilities in Wales of the Welsh Assembly Government and the National Offender Management Service.

Otley Police Station

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department

(1) what guidance he has given to West Yorkshire police on the provision of 24-hour helpdesk services at Otley police station; [64406]

(2) what assessment he has made of the effects that the proposed closure of the 24-hour helpdesk at Otley police station will have on the residents of Otley, with particular reference to those without adequate access to public transport necessary to reach easily the nearest police station. [64408]

The management of the police estate and allocation of resources are matters for each police authority and the chief officer, who are responsible for assessing local needs. The ownership of police stations is vested in the local police authority, not the Home Office. Their use is a matter for local decisions.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what factors underlay the decision to close the 24-hour helpdesk at Otley police station. [64407]

The management of the police estate and allocation of resources are matters for each police authority and the chief officer, who are responsible for assessing local needs. The ownership of police stations is vested in the local police authority, not the Home Office. Their use and disposal are a matter for local decisions. West Yorkshire police have informed me that research has been commissioned to investigate the number of visitors attending every front counter help desk in their force area. Decisions to close helpdesks or reduce hours of opening have been taken after consideration of the results of this research.

Prisons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer of 12 October 2005, Official Report, column 490W, on the Prison Service, what proportion of the prison population has no recorded religious beliefs; and how many prisons have a multi-faith chaplaincy team that (a) includes and (b) does not include a representative of non-religious beliefs. [64076]

At the end of February 2006, 32 per cent. of prisoners in prison establishments in England and Wales were recorded as having no religious affiliation. Chaplaincy teams include chaplains from a range of faith traditions depending on need and local circumstances. They would not normally include a representative of non religious beliefs. Chaplaincy teams provide pastoral support to prisoners and staff of all faiths, and none. Prisons provide a range of other support services and activities for those who do not wish to avail themselves of chaplaincy services.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer of 8 July 2005, Official Report, column 557W, on prison food, what steps his Department has taken to ensure that only halal meat is served to Muslim prisoners in all Prison Service establishments. [64077]

Prisons are required to offer a multi-choice menu. When a halal meat or poultry menu is offered, an alternative non-halal meat or poultry choice must be provided and clearly identified on a published menu.

Probation Service

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many complaints have been made about (a) Essex and (b) Southend probation services in each year since 1997; and how many of those complaints have been upheld in each year. [48870]

A National Complaints Procedure, agreed by the Secretary of State, enables local probation areas to handle complaints. Unresolved local complaints are escalated to the independent Prison and Probation Ombudsman. The following table lists complaints made against Essex Probation and the number upheld in each year from 2001. Information is not available for the Southend probation service.

The following table shows the numbers of complaints received in total by Essex probation area since 1 September 2001 for each completed time period. The figures contain both formal and informal complaints. The number upheld column refers to the number of complaints where the area has accepted validity in the complaint and action has been taken. The following figures are not comparable to the figures collected by the independent Prison and Probation Ombudsman.

Number received

Number upheld

September 2001-March 2002

8

1

April 2002-March 2003

23

2

April 2003-December 2003

24

2

January 2004-December 2004

21

3

January 2005-December 2005

13

2

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people in (a) England and Wales and (b) Lancashire were returned to prison after violating their probation conditions in each year since 2000. [61330]

holding answer 27 March 2006

The table shows the number of recalls to custody for the whole of England and Wales, for each fiscal year since 1 April 2000 to 31 March 2005. The figures include recalls of those released on the Home Detention Curfew Scheme. The information is not broken down by county and to do so would incur disproportionate cost.

Total number of recalls

2000–01

3,182

2001–02

5,086

2002–03

8,388

2003–04

11,215

2004–05

11,081

Schools (Sexual Harassment)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many sexual harassment cases have been recorded in secondary schools in (a) Romford, (b) Havering, (c) Greater London and (d) England and Wales in each of the last 10 years. [62979]

I have been asked to reply.

The Department for Education and Skills does not record the information that you have requested.

Serious Organised Crime and Police Act

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many protests have been granted permission by the police under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 since it came into force. [64833]

The Commissioner of the Metropolis is responsible for the day-to-day operational management of the force. I have passed your question to him and asked him to respond to you directly. I will arrange for a copy of the reply to be placed in the House Library.

Vandalism

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many instances of vandalism were reported in (a) Southend and (b) Essex in each year since 1990. [64365]

The requested information is given in the tables. Offences of vandalism are recorded within the criminal damage group classification. Crime statistics for Southend are recorded at Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership (CDRP) level; and for the offence of criminal damage are available from 2000–01 to 2004–05.

Table 1: Recorded offences of criminal damage—1990 to 1997 -- Number

Period

Southend CDRP

Essex police force area

1990

14,265

1991

15,631

1992

16,959

1993

17,293

1994

17,968

1995

18,286

1996

20,381

1997

18,845

Note:

The data in this table is prior to the introduction of the revised counting rules for recorded crime, which came into effect on 1 April 1998. Therefore, these figures are not directly comparable with those for later years.

Table 2: Recorded offences of criminal damage—1998–99 to 2001–02 -- Number

Period

Southend CDRP

Essex police force area

1998–99

18,834

1999–2000

21,766

2000–01

3,277

24,673

2001–02

3,267

26,990

Note:

The data in this table is prior to the introduction of the National Crime Recording Standard. These figures are not directly comparable with those for later years.

Table 3: Recorded offences of criminal damage—2002–03 to 2004–05 -- Number

Period

Southend CDRP

Essex police force area

2002–03

3,598

30,337

2003–04

4,210

34,253

2004–05

4,308

32,406

Note:

The data in this table takes account of the introduction of the National Crime Recording Standard in April 2002. These figures are not directly comparable with those for earlier years.

Violent Crime

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer of 12 January 2006, Official Report, columns 838–9W, on violent crime, if he will break down the information provided in the categories of (a) other assault and (b) other violence against the person, including the number of rapes. [46010]

In the period January 1999 to December 2005 the National Offender Management Service has been notified of three rapes committed while the offender was subject to the HOC scheme. To break down further the cases listed under the categories of other assault and other violence against the person would incur disproportionate cost.

Wandsworth Council

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much was provided to Wandsworth council to tackle antisocial behaviour in the last year for which figures are available. [64134]

A wide range of funding streams across government have a positive impact on tackling antisocial behaviour at a local level. For example, Neighbourhood Renewal programmes which focus on the most deprived areas and give practitioners and local communities a real opportunity to turn their neighbourhoods around; the Department for Education and Skills (DFES) through their work on schools and parenting contribute to preventing problems escalating and ensuring families get the support they need.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and their work in tackling litter and fly tipping which can often blight neighbourhoods where antisocial behaviour and crime can take hold; and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) who provide the opportunity to divert young people from the destructive and damaging involvement in antisocial behaviour.

The Departmental for Constitutional Affairs (DCA) also contributes to ensure a swift and effective criminal justice system for dealing with the perpetrators of anti-social behaviour activity. In relation to specific Home Office funding to tackle anti-social behaviour in the last two financial years we have allocated £25,000 to every CDRP in both England and Wales to fund an antisocial behaviour co-ordinator. This amounts to £9.4 million per annum. Funding for 2005–06 was part of the Safer, Stronger Communities Fund (SSCF) and this arrangement will continue for the next two years (2006–07 and 2007–08).