Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 449: debated on Tuesday 18 July 2006

Written Answers to Questions

Monday 17 July 2006

Treasury

Annuities

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to the response by the Economic Secretary to the Treasury of 4 July 2006, Official Report, column 729, on the Finance (No. 2) Bill, if he will place in the Library a note setting out the basis for his calculation of the £100 million cost of amendments to the rules on the compulsory purchase of annuities. (83603)

The Exchequer cost arising from this proposal depends upon behavioural responses. But, assuming that the technical deficiencies with the proposal would be corrected, we stated a conservative overall initial cost of the measure of around £100 million per annum. Our longer term estimate of the overall costs is around £175 to £225 million per annum.

This potential cost consists of two main elements. First, allowing larger lump sums to be taken out and taxed at marginal rate at age 75 would have a tax cost because additional pension savings would be induced.

The up-front tax cost of these additional pension savings is estimated to be in the region of £300 to £500 million per annum. Around three quarters of this would be reclaimed as income tax on the resulting retirement benefits. This gives a broad range for this part of the costing of £75 to £125 million per annum. We used the lower range of this estimate for our conservative initial cost.

Secondly, allowing individuals to leave pensions untouched until death and then bequeath the capital would reduce income tax on pensions in payment. As any additional savings held in pension assets at death would largely displace other liquid assets, held inheritance tax (IHT) would not increase to offset this income tax lost. Even if wealth held at death were to increase as a result of the tabled amendments, the average effective rate of IHT on such assets would still be far below the rate of income tax. Only 6 per cent. of estates have an IHT charge.

The longer term costs of this behaviour are very uncertain but are estimated at £100 million per annum in lost income tax. But this would take time to build up and we have used one quarter of this amount for our conservative initial cost.

Computer Learning Centres

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many computer learning centres have been set up in each year since 1999. (84792)

I have been asked to reply.

The term “computer learning centres” potentially covers a wide range of provision, not all of which would have been funded by Government.

However, I can say that between 1999 and 2003, with funding from the Capital Modernisation Fund and the New Opportunities Fund, around 6,000 UK online centres were established across England.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much his Department has spent on computer learning centres in each year since 1999; and if he will make a statement. (84793)

I have been asked to reply.

The term “computer learning centres” potentially covers a wide range of provision, not all of which would have been funded by Government.

However, I can say that between 1999 and 2003, a total of £396 million from the Capital Modernisation Fund and the New Opportunities Fund was invested in setting up UK online centres across England.

Data Protection

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to the Answer of 26 June 2006, Official Report, column 92W, on data protection, what is the longest period of time that has elapsed for HM Revenue and Customs to respond to its satisfaction to a subject access request in the first instance. [84939]

[holding answer 13 July 2006]: The response meeting this description was the case cited in my reply of 26 June. The original letter was an appeal against a separate HMRC decision, although it also contained a subject access request.

Demographics

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what percentage of the population of (a) the UK, (b) Peterborough constituency and (c) the Peterborough City Council area is aged (i) under 25, (ii) between 25 and 34, (iii) between 35 and 44, (iv) between 45 and 54, (v) between 55 and 64 and (vi) over 65. (85992)

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 17 July 2006:

As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your question concerning the percentage of the population of (a) the UK (b) Peterborough Constituency and (c) Peterborough Unitary Authority aged (i) under 25, (ii) between 25 and 34, (iii) between 35 and 44, (iv) between 45 and 54, (v) between 55 and 64 and (vi) over 65. (85992)

The latest available data for the UK and Peterborough Unitary Authority (UA) are the mid-2004 population estimates. The mid-2005 population estimates for the UK and local authorities in England and Wales are due to be published on 24 August 2006.

Mid-year population estimates are not produced for parliamentary constituencies. For this reason, the latest data available for Peterborough Constituency is from the 2001 Census.

The attached table shows the percentages requested for each age group and area, based on the latest available figures for these areas.

Percentage of population in selected age groups for UK, Peterborough Unitary Authority and Peterborough Parliamentary Constituency, Mid-2004 Population Estimates, Census 2001

Age Group

UK

Peterborough Unitary Authority

Peterborough Parliamentary Constituency

Under 25

31

33

34

25 to 34

13

15

15

35 to 44

15

15

14

45 to 54

13

12

13

55 to 64

12

10

9

Over 65

16

14

14

Source: Office for National Statistics.

ECOFIN

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many ECOFIN council meetings were attended by each Minister in his Department in each year since May 1997. (83510)

Ministerial attendance and the outcome of each ECOFIN have been reported either by written ministerial statement, written answer or, occasionally, by letter to the Chairman of the European Scrutiny Committee.

Enterprise Insight

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to his oral statement of 15 June 2006, Official Report, column 886, on Enterprise Insight, how many new businesses have been set up in Northern Ireland as a result of Enterprise Insight; and when he last met the chief executive of Enterprise Insight. (85685)

Enterprise Insight was created in 1999 to promote a culture of enterprise in the UK by running a national campaign promoting the spirit of enterprise to young people and those who influence them. It is funded by the Small Business Service to cover activities in England only and it does not provide business support services for enterprises based in Northern Ireland. Treasury Ministers regularly meet a wide range of individuals and organisations in the course of policy development. As is the case with previous administrations, it is not the practice of the Government to provide details of these meetings.

EU Budget

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what steps his Department has taken to reduce UK contributions to the EU budget since 1997; what reductions have been made in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. (84294)

The UK’s contributions to the EU budget are determined in accordance with the Own Resources Decision, details of which can be found at paragraph 2.15 of the “European Community Finances” White Paper (Cm 6770, page 7). The level of these contributions is also dependent in negotiation of the annual EU budget and HM Treasury plays an active role in these discussions, see below. The UK’s contributions fluctuate from year to year as can be seen in Tables 31 and 3.2 of the “European Community Finances” White Paper (Cm 6770, page 15 and 17). These fluctuations occur for a variety of reasons, as explained in paragraph 3.6 of the “European Community Finances” White Paper (Cm 6770, page 15).

The Government also participate in Council negotiations on the setting of the annual budget, where we seek to control budget growth in line with genuine needs and implementation capacity, and to focus spending where it adds most value and is most cost effective. This budget disciplined approach helps restrict the growth in UK contributions.

Of course most of the annual budget is pre-set by treaty obligations and multi-annual spending programmes. Furthermore the UK is but one of 25 member states. Decisions in the Council on the annual budget are taken by Qualified Majority, and the final budget must be agreed with the European Parliament. Nevertheless by working effectively with like-minded member states, the Government are able to influence the outcome.

In the last five years Council/EP negotiations have amended the Commission’s preliminary draft budget (PDB) proposal and these figures are published annually in the “European Community Finances” White Paper.

Illegal Food Imports

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what estimate his Department has made of the proportion of passengers entering the UK each year with prohibited (a) products of animal origin and (b) fruit, vegetables and plant products in their luggage; (85612)

(2) what estimate his Department has made of the amount of (a) meat and (b) fruit, vegetables and plant products entering the UK illegally in each of the last three years;

(3) how many seizures of prohibited (a) products of animal origin and (b) fruit, vegetables and plant products there were at UK ports and airports in each of the last six years, broken down by product type; and what weight of each type of product was seized in each year;

(4) what proportion of passengers searched by HM Revenue and Customs at UK ports and airports in each of the last six years were found to be carrying prohibited (a) products of animal origin and (b) fruit, vegetables and plant products in their luggage.

HM Revenue and Customs’ central records for POAO, fruit and vegetable and plant products seized by customs officers at ports and airports in Great Britain for the past three financial years are as follows:

Seizures of POAO, fruit, vegetable and plant products

2003-04

2004-05

January to December 2005

Total number of seizures of POAO

15,316

25,286

22,597

Total weight of seized POAO items (kg)

174,206

216,889

175,435

Total number of seizures of fruit, vegetable and plant products

1,246

1,497

1,276

Total weight of fruit, vegetable and plant products seized (kg)

21,253

28,189

25,409

Types of POAO seizures

2003-04

2004-05

January to December 2005

Number of meat seizures

6,473

10,792

9,890

Weight of meat seizures (kg)

70,083

77,087

57,562

Number of fish seizures

5,156

8,235

7,189

Weight of fish seizures (kg)

67,625

84,563

72,944

Number of dairy seizures

3,108

5,091

4,477

Weight of dairy seizures (kg)

27,564

40,265

35,667

Number of honey seizures

530

1,168

1,041

Weight of honey seizures (kg)

8,934

14,975

9,262

Information on POAO seizures made prior to April 2003 can be found in DEFRA's Annual Review of Controls on Imports of Animal Products last published in July 2005.

HMRC do not produce estimates on the amount of illegal meat imported into the UK. Such estimates are held by the Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA).

HMRC make no estimates of the proportion of passengers entering the UK each year with POAO and fruit, vegetables and plant products in their luggage.

Income Tax

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much income tax was paid on average per household in each of the last three financial years; and what estimate he has made of the average amount of tax which will be paid in 2006-07. (85394)

Information can be found on the Office for National Statistics (ONS) website in table 14, “Average incomes, taxes and benefits by decile groups of all households” in the article “The effects of taxes and benefits on household income” from the ONS’ Economic Trends publications.

For 2004-05:

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/economic_trends/ET_May_Francis_Jones.pdf

For 2003-04:

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/nojournal/taxesbenefits200304/taxesbenefits200304.pdf

For 2002-03:

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/economic_trends/ET607Lakin.pdf

Similar information for 2005-06 and 2006-07 is not yet available.

Malawi

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer on how many occasions he has visited Malawi since 1997; and what the outcome was of each visit. (82306)

Modern Apprenticeship Taskforce

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many times the Modern Apprenticeship Taskforce announced in the 2002 pre-Budget has convened. (84808)

The Apprenticeship Task Force (ATF) met for the first time in April 2003 and subsequently seven times with the final meeting in May 2005. In April 2006, the Apprenticeship Ambassadors Network (AAN) was established to continue the work of the ATF.

National Lottery

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the tax yield to the Treasury on national lottery ticket sales has been in each year since it was launched. (84981)

The information requested is publicly available on the UK Trade Info website (http://www.uktradeinfo.com).

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether VAT is charged on the construction of sports facilities funded by the national lottery. (84982)

Under European agreements we may keep our zero rates, but may not extend them or introduce new ones.

VAT is chargeable on the construction of all new non-residential buildings, other than those that will be used at least 90 per cent. for a relevant charitable purpose—such as free-of-charge activities provided by a charity, a village hall or similar.

Where VAT is chargeable on construction and is not reclaimable through the VAT system, it is reasonable to expect this cost to be taken into account when an organisation makes a bid for national lottery funding.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether athletes funded by the national lottery are exempt from tax and national insurance contributions on the grants awarded to them. (84983)

Whether an athlete is liable for income tax and national insurance contributions on a National Lottery Sports Fund grant will depend on whether he or she is earning an income as a self-employed person from competing in any sport (including any associated activities such as sponsorship or journalism). That is a question of fact to be determined in individual cases. Detailed guidance on these issues is provided in the HMRC Business Income Manual (beginning at page BIM50650), available on the HMRC website at:

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/bimmanual/BIM50650.htm

Online Tax Reduction Claims

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many small companies have gone online and claimed a special tax reduction in each year since 2000. (84817)

The number of small companies that have submitted their Employer’s Annual Returns online and a “special tax reduction” has been made as follows:

Return for year to 5 April:

2000

0

2001

1,400

2002

0

2003

0

2004

0

2005

900,000

Parliamentary Questions

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many parliamentary questions tabled to his Department were awaiting a reply on 10 July 2006; which of those had been waiting longer than (a) two and (b) three weeks for a reply; and what the reason for the delay was in each case. (85211)

Treasury Ministers endeavour to answer parliamentary questions promptly wherever possible. Of the 173 written questions which were awaiting answer on 10 July, 119 had been received at least a fortnight previously and 85 of these questions had been received at least three weeks previously.

Treasury Ministers had answered 5,252 questions in the present session up to 10 July. For the Treasury's performance in answering written questions within the timescales set by the House, I refer the hon. Gentleman to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Yeovil (Mr. Laws) on 11 July 2006, Official Report, columns 1724-5W.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he will answer Question (a) 38754, (b) 46531, (c) 62788, (d) 63040, (e) 63323, (f) 72367, (g) 75746, (h) 75752, (i) 75754, (j) 75747, (k) 75748, (l) 75756, (m) 75751, (n) 75757, (o) 75755, (p) 75768, (q) 75769, (r) 75775, (s) 75776, (t) 75780, (u) 75783, (v) 75784, (w) 75789, (x) 75817, (y) 75818, (z) 75842, (aa) 76207, (bb) 76418, (cc) 76419, (dd) 76421, (ee) 76422, (ff) 76423, (gg) 76425, (hh) 76426, (ii) 76429, (jj) 76430, (kk) 76431, (ll) 76432, (mm) 76470, (nn) 76471, (oo) 76474, (pp) 76475, (qq) 76476, (rr) 76478, (ss) 76480, (tt) 76481, (uu) 76482, (vv) 76483, (ww) 76484, (xx) 76485, (yy) 76487, (zz) 76488, (aaa) 76853, (bbb) 76854, (ccc) 76870, (ddd) 76946, (eee) 76994, (fff) 76995 and (ggg) 76996, on tax credits, tabled by the hon. Member for Yeovil; what the reasons are for the time taken to reply in each case; and what guidance his Department applies on the length of time that should be taken to answer. (85763)

Question 38754 was a duplicate of the hon. Member’s question 38697, which was answered on 10 January, and as such was withdrawn by the Table Office and never appeared in the Questions Book. Some of the other questions concerned have already been answered. Those that have not will be answered as soon as possible.

Treasury Ministers endeavour to answer questions within the timescales set by the House. The provision of timely answers depends in part upon the number of questions the Department is dealing with. The Treasury has answered 554 questions from the hon. Gentleman in the present Session, the great majority of which have concerned tax credits.

Planning Gain Supplement

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many written submissions the Government have received to the consultation on Planning Gain Supplement; and if he will place in the Library a copy of each submission. (85539)

I refer the hon. Member to the answers I gave the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) on 6 and 16 March 2006, Official Report, columns 1105W and 2417W respectively.

Population Statistics

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he plans to change the methods of collecting local authority population statistics to take account of immigration from EU accession countries in the period since May 2004; and if he will make a statement. (85001)

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 17 July 2006:

As National Statistician I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking whether the Chancellor of the Exchequer plans to review the methods of collecting local authority population statistics in order to take account of immigration from EU accession countries in the period since May 2004. (85001)

Migration of accession country citizens to and from the UK is captured via existing data sources that are used to estimate population change. For population estimation purposes, the definition of a migrant is someone who changes their country of usual residence for a period of at least a year which is the UN recommended definition of a long term migrant. The 2005 mid-year population estimates, due to be published on 24 August 2006, will therefore include an estimate of the number of long term immigrants from the EU accession countries, based on the UN definition.

It is recognised that information about short-term migrants is needed, both nationally and at local levels, for policy and planning purposes and for service provision. In May of this year, ONS set up an Inter-departmental Task Force on Migration Statistics. The Task Force will report to me by the end of August, making recommendations on timely improvements that could be made to the estimates of migration and migrant populations in the United Kingdom, both nationally and at local level.

ONS are also carrying out an extensive programme of work titled Improving Migration and Population Statistics (IMPS) Project which is designed to investigate improvements to the population and migration statistics produced by ONS. Further information on this work can be found at: www.statistics.gov.uk/IMPS. In particular:

The IMPS programme of research is taking forward recommendations from the National Statistics Quality Review (NSQR) into International Migration. The quality review made recommendations for improving the estimation of total migration flows to and from the UK and the allocation of international migration to local areas. This work includes investigating administrative sources that may be used in producing or quality assuring the international migration estimates (such as the Worker Registration Scheme data), investigating potential sources of information about short-term migrants and making improvements to the current source of information on international migrants, the International Passenger Survey (IPS).

The latest Progress Report on taking forward the recommendations of the NSQR on International Migration can be found at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/about/data/methodology/quality/reviews/population.asp

Also, as part of the IMPS programme, ONS are conducting Local Authority case studies. These aim to get a better understanding, from a local perspective, of the administrative data sources that are currently used in the population estimation procedure. They will also investigate any other high quality sources that the local areas use themselves for population purposes. The local areas selected for these studies are ones that are known to have reasons which make their population difficult to estimate, e.g. those with a high volume of migratory moves. It is intended that these studies will contribute towards the improvement of both internal and international migration statistics.

Sniffer Dogs

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many meat detector sniffer dogs were employed at each UK (a) port and (b) airport in each of the last six years. (85611)

Meat detection dogs were introduced by DEFRA in 2002, and were transferred to HMRC in 2003. The number of animal origin detector dogs used at ports and airports in Great Britain since 2002 is in the following table:

Number of dogs

2002

2

2003

2

2004

6

2005

10

2006

9 (+2 in training)

These dogs are employed on a mobile basis across Great Britain.

We cannot disclose further information about the deployment of the dogs as this would provide information of value to those seeking to circumvent HMRC controls, thereby prejudicing the prevention and detection of crime.

Statutory Instruments

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer on what occasions a statutory instrument sponsored by his Department has been reported by the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments as defective since October 2005. (85193)

Since October 2005, two statutory instruments sponsored by HM Treasury have been reported by the JCSI as defective:

One in its report of 2 November 2005, and

One in its report of 8 November 2005.

In addition one instrument sponsored by HM Revenue and Customs was so reported in the Committee's report of 1 February 2006.

Taskforce on Migration Statistics

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he expects the taskforce on migration statistics to report to Ministers; and if he will make a statement. (85002)

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 17 July 2006:

As National Statistician I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he expects the Taskforce on Migration Statistics to report to Ministers. (85002)

The aim of the Task Force is to report to me, as National Statistician, by the end of August, making recommendations on timely improvements that could be made to the estimates of migration and migrant populations in the United Kingdom, both nationally and at local level. I will report to Ministers in October, after the Parliamentary recess.

Tax Credits

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the cost of abolishing the family element of the child tax credit and giving equivalent support through child benefit; and if he will make a statement. (84908)

Child tax credit (CTC) includes a family element of £545 per year. It also includes a baby addition at a rate of a further £545 per year for families for periods when they are responsible for a child aged under one year. Equivalent payments are made to families receiving their child support via income support or jobseeker’s allowance. Abolishing these elements would reduce expenditure on CTC by around £3.3 billion per year, based on 2004-05 awards. The extra child benefit expenditure resulting from adding the weekly equivalents to the rate for the eldest child would be around £4.3 billion per year. Therefore, the net cost would be £1 billion per year.

The recent Joseph Rowntree Foundation report “What will it take to end child poverty?” suggested that the child tax credit was probably the most cost-effective way of reducing child poverty. To achieve the same effect by raising child benefit would be up to three times as expensive.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many frauds involving claims for tax credits have been found to be based on false identities in (a) 2003-04, (b) 2004-05 and (c) 2005-06; and how much was paid in respect of fraudulent claims based on false identities in each year. (58999)

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to the answer of 10 January 2006, Official Report, column 557W, on tax credits, (1) how much had been paid out to the 22,284 claims in payment that were stopped; on what dates he met the Paymaster General to discuss the problem of tax credit fraud; how many calls to the helpline have been received where fraud is suspected; and if he will commission an independent review into tax credit fraud; (46531)

(2) how many tax credit claims in payment have been stopped since June 2004 because of fraud or suspected fraud; and if he will make a statement;

(3) how many employees of Network Rail had their identities used in tax credit fraud in 2005-06; what the cost to the Exchequer was; and if he will make a statement;

(4) what his estimate is of the scale of identity fraud in relation to tax credits; how many tax credits staff have been involved in identity fraud since 2003-04; and if he will make a statement;

(5) what recent action his Department has taken to reduce the level of tax credit fraud;

(6) what his latest estimate is of the cost of tax credit fraud for each quarter from April 2003 to April 2006; and if he will make a statement;

(7) what his latest estimate is of the number of people who experienced identity fraud as a result of tax credits fraud in (a) 2005-06 and (b) 2006-07 to date; and if he will make a statement;

(8) what his latest estimate is of the level of (a) fraud and (b) error in respect of tax credit payments in (i) 2003-04 and (ii) 2004-05; and if he will make a statement;

(9) when he plans to publish the final assessment of tax credit fraud for 2003-04; and if he will make a statement;

(10) what his latest estimates are of the number of cases of tax credit fraud in each reporting period since 2001-02; and if he will make a statement;

(11) if he will make a statement on the level of fraud in claims for the childcare tax credit;

(12) how many tax credit claims have been stopped due to fraud and suspicion of fraud in each month from January to May; and if he will make a statement;

(13) if he will make a statement on tax credit fraud by people claiming as lone parents;

(14) what assessment he has made of the level of tax credit fraud by people claiming disabled worker status;

(15) what information on tax credit fraud his Department has made available to the National Audit Office since 1 January; and if he will make a statement;

(16) how many planned measures to reduce tax credit fraud had not been implemented as at 1 June 2006; and if he will make a statement;

(17) on what date he sent the National Audit Office estimates of tax credit fraud and error for 2003-04 based upon the assessment of a sample of 4,700 cases;

(18) whether (a) Ministers and (b) special advisers have seen (i) drafts and (ii) a final version of the HM Revenue and Customs report into tax credit fraud and error which was due to be published in spring 2006; and if he will make a statement;

(19) what his latest estimate is of the breakdown between (a) fraud, (b) official error and (c) claimant error in the existing estimates for tax credit fraud and error; and if he will make a statement;

(20) if he will publish the report received by the Paymaster General in June 2005 on suspected fraudulent activity in the tax credit system; and if he will make a statement.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether randomised sample tax credit cases are tested to ensure residency criteria are complied with. (80560)

I refer my right hon. Friend the Member for Birkenhead (Mr. Field) and the hon. Members for Yeovil (Mr. Laws) and for Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey (Danny Alexander) to the statement I made to the House on 11 July 2006, Official Report, columns 1281-82. I refer them also to the HMRC publications “Child and Working Tax Credits: Error and fraud statistics 2003-04” and “Tackling error and fraud in the Child and Working Tax Credits”, available on the HMRC website at www.hmrc.gov.uk/news/index.htm., and to “HM Revenue and Customs 2005-06 Accounts: The Comptroller and Auditor General’s Standard Report”, part 2, available at http://www.nao.org.uk/pn/05-06/05061159.htm.

Tax Rebates (IT Equipment)

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many small companies have claimed a tax rebate on the cost of purchasing computers or investing in information technology in each year since 2000. (84816)

Small companies are able to claim tax relief in the form of capital allowances for expenditure on a wide range of assets. Claims for capital allowances are not broken down to the level of detail required for firm estimates of the number of small companies investing in computers or information technology specifically.

Tax Receipts (Energy)

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what his latest estimate is of the total tax receipts relating to energy in (a) 2005, (b) 2004 and (c) 2003. (84973)

Receipts from taxes on energy are published by the Office for National Statistics in table 3.1 of the Environmental Accounts that can be found at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_environment/EAMay06.pdf.

Taxable Homecare Allowance

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will (a) estimate the total cost of introducing a taxable homecare allowance of £150 per week to all families with one child under the age of three and £50 for each additional child under three net of the abolition of the working tax credit and child tax credit schemes and (b) assess the likely impact on child poverty of introducing such a scheme; and if he will make a statement. (85797)

Education and Skills

Access to Work Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many disabled staff in his Department received support through the Access to Work scheme (a) in each of the last five years and (b) in 2006-07. (82225)

The Department does not collect information about the Access to Work scheme in the form requested centrally and it could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. Since 2003, my Department has provided assistance for its disabled staff from its own reasonable adjustments fund. This fund has assisted over 500 staff.

Adult Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many colleges have made representations to the Department in the last 12 months concerning (a) adult education courses being cut and (b) places on such courses being reduced due to funding pressures. (81698)

Our records for the last 12 months indicate that we have received 221 letters from MPs on a range of FE funding issues including proposed changes to adult courses. Some letters from MPs include correspondence forwarded from FE college principals and in addition to these letters we have received 18 letters directly from FE college principles on FE funding issues.

We do not have records of any representations made in person by or on behalf of colleges. However, both I and my colleagues have regular meetings with providers and stakeholders including representative organisations such as the Association of Colleges and the Association of Learning Providers about adult education.

Bullying

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many incidents of bullying were recorded in (a) primary and (b) secondary schools in Suffolk in each of the last five years. (85542)

We are unable to provide this information because we do not collect these data centrally. However, individual schools may record incidents of bullying and some local authorities keep records for their own area, which we welcome as best practice within our anti-bullying guidance to schools, “Don’t Suffer in Silence”.

Since 2003-04, however, we have collected data on the reasons for exclusions from schools. In the 2004-05 academic year, 130 pupils were permanently excluded and 7,680 were given fixed period exclusions for bullying. This information comes from the Statistical First Release on “Permanent and Fixed Period Exclusion from Schools and Exclusion Appeals in England, 2004/05”.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many incidents of bullying of teachers by (a) their peers and (b) management have been reported in each year since 1997; and if he will make a statement. (85433)

The Department for Education and Skills does not record the information that my hon. Friend has requested. Bullying of teachers by anyone is unacceptable. Teachers who feel that they have been subjected to bullying should report incidents to their employer and, where appropriate, their professional association immediately.

Chat Rooms

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what discussions he had with the Home Department on vetting chat room moderators on the internet prior to the publication of the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill. (84123)

[holding answer 10 July 2006]: There has been a series of discussions between DfES and Home Office officials about the provisions in the Bill for vetting chat room moderators. These discussions have also included representatives of the industry. They have been helpful in clarifying the extent of the vetting requirement.

Children Leaving Care

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of young people who left care in the last 12 months in West Lancashire constituency are in education, training or employment. (83538)

Information on the proportion of young people who left care in the last 12 months who are in education, training or employment is not collected by the Department for Education and Skills (DfES). However, the following table shows information on care leavers on their 19th birthday who were looked after in their 17th year and is available at national level and for the local authority of Lancashire. Information is not available at constituency level.

Activity on 19th birthday of care leavers who were looked after on 1 April 2002 aged 16 (in their 17th year) or over in the year ending 31 March 2005 1,2

Numbers and percentages

Care leavers on 19th birthday

In education, training or employment

Percentage in education, training or employment

England (National)

5,200

3,100

59

Lancashire (local authority)

100

45

47

1Source:

DfES—Figures are taken from the SSDA903 return which since 2003-04 covered all looked after children. Excerpt from Table 22 of the Statistical Volume on Children looked after by Local Authorities Year Ending 31 March 2005—Volume 2: Local Authorities

2 Historical data may differ from older publications. This is mainly due to the implementation of amendments and corrections of amendments and corrections sent by some local authorities after the publication date of previous materials.

Note:

To maintain the confidentiality of each individual child, data at national level are rounded to the nearest 100 if they exceed 1,000 to the nearest 10 otherwise. At local authority level, data are rounded to the nearest 5.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the average age of children leaving care was in West Lancashire constituency in (a) 2004 and (b) 2005. (83539)

The following table shows the average age of children leaving care in Lancashire in 2004 and 2005. Information at constituency level is not collected centrally.

Children who ceased to be looked after during the years ending 31 March 2004 and 2005 by average age at end of latest period of care 1,2,3

year:month

2003-04

2004-05

England (National)

Average age at end of stay (yr:mth)

10:7

10:9

Lancashire (local authority)

Average age at end of stay (yr:mth)

11:2

10:6

1Source:

DfES—Figures are taken from the SSDA903 return which since 2003-04 covered all looked after children.

2 Historical data may differ from older publications. This is mainly due to the implementation of amendments and corrections sent by some local authorities after the publication date of previous materials.

3 To maintain the confidentiality of each individual child, data at national level are rounded to the nearest 100 if they exceed 1,000 to the nearest 10 otherwise.

At local authority level data are rounded to the nearest 5.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many children left care in West Lancashire constituency in (a) 2004 and (b) 2005; and how many have left in 2006. (83541)

The following table shows the number of children leaving care in Lancashire in 2004 and 2005. Information for 2006 will be available at local authority level in March 2007. Information at constituency level is not collected centrally.

Children who ceased to be looked after during the years ending 31 March 2004 and 2005 by average age at end of latest period of care1, 2

Number

2003-04

2004-05

England (national)

25,800

25,600

Lancashire (local authority)

525

515

1 Historical data may differ from older publications. This is mainly due to the implementation of amendments and corrections sent by some local authorities after the publication date of previous materials. 2 To maintain the confidentiality of each individual child, data at national level are rounded to the nearest 100 if they exceed 1,000, to the nearest 10 otherwise. At local authority level data are rounded to the nearest 5. Source: DfES—Figures are taken from the SSDA903 return which since 2003-04 covered all looked after children.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many young people in West Lancashire who left care in 2005 stayed in (a) their own house, (b) with friends and (c) in hostel or bed and breakfast accommodation. (83555)

Information on young people who left care in 2005 is not available by the breakdown requested. However, the following table shows how many young people in Lancashire who left care in 2005 had as their last placement, a placement in (a) an independent living, (b) with own parents and (c) in home and hostels. Note that a placement in independent living includes staying in a flat, or staying in lodgings without supported staff, staying in a bed and breakfast and finally staying with friends. Information at constituency level is not collected centrally.

Children who ceased to be looked after in 2005 whose last placement was in independent livings, with own parents or in homes and hostels1NumberPlacements2All children3Independent livings4Own parents5Homes and hostels6Others7England (national)25,6001,5002,5002,50019,100Lancashire (local authority)5152565803401 Historical data may differ from older publications. This is mainly due to the implementation of amendments and corrections sent by some local authorities after the publication date of previous materials. 2 To maintain the confidentiality of each individual child, data at national level are rounded to the nearest 100 if they exceed 1,000, to the nearest 10 otherwise. At local authority level data are rounded to the nearest 5. As a consequence of our rounding and suppression, figures may not sum to the total. 3 Total number of children looked after who left care in 2005. 4 Independent livings include in flat or lodgings without formal support staff, or in bedsit, B&B, or with friends. 5 Own parents means placed with own parents or other person with parental responsibility. 6 Homes and hostels inside and outside local authority boundary. 7 “Others” include looked after children placed for adoption, in foster placement with relatives or friends, in other foster placements provided by the local authority or provided by an agency, in residential employment, in secure units, in residential accommodation not subject to regulation, in other residential care home, in schools, in temporary placements, children missing from placements, children missing from care and other placements not listed above. Source: DfES—Figures are taken from the SSDA903 return which since 2003-04 covered all looked after children.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what support services are available to young people leaving care in West Lancashire to help them deal with the financial and practical aspects of independent living. (83556)

Services to care leavers in Lancashire are provided directly by Lancashire county council. Services for care leavers in West Lancashire are co-ordinated by the county’s south area leaving care team which supports young people who live in a wide area, from Skelmersdale to the boundaries of Preston and Southport.

Every care leaver must have a pathway plan based on an assessment of their personal needs, setting out the services that will be necessary to support them to greater independence. Leaving care services in the West Lancashire area draw on a wide range of professional staff to contribute to the support of individual care leavers including foster carers, children’s home staff, social workers, specialist leaving care staff, Connexions staff and specialist welfare rights and housing staff. Care leavers in West Lancashire also have opportunities to take up work experience arranged by the Looked After Children Employment Skills (LACES) project.

The exact level of financial support provided to any care leaver will be recorded in the individual’s pathway plan. Up until the age of eighteen, the local authority will usually be his/her primary source of income. Lancashire, as is the case for other local authorities, is responsible for funding accommodation, maintenance and other expenses (e.g. travel and leisure costs). Once care leavers reach 18, they are entitled to have access to the same mainstream arrangements for obtaining financial help as other young people. It will be the role of their leaving care personal adviser to assist them to access this help. However Lancashire, as the responsible local authority, has a continuing duty to provide assistance, for as long as the young person remains in an approved programme, with the costs of education or training.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many (a) leaving-care workers and (b) personal advisors are available to young people leaving care in West Lancashire constituency; and how regularly they have contact with individual clients on average. (83557)

Services to care leavers in Lancashire are provided directly by Lancashire county council. Services for care leavers in West Lancashire are provided by the south area leaving care team. This team comprises a manager, one qualified social worker, one support worker, two leaving care co-ordinators and an administrator. Two members on this team are specifically available to provide support as leaving care personal advisers.

The level of contact that is maintained with each individual care leaver depends on their personal needs. In Lancashire, where young people entitled to care leaving services continue to remain looked after by the local authority, their social workers must visit at least every three months. However, when young people are being actively prepared to leave care, contact will be far more frequent than this and where a young person requires intensive support, contact might take place several times a week. The team estimates that, on average, all care leavers in West Lancashire are seen at least fortnightly.

Young people are also able to make contact with the leaving care team without formal appointments. They make regular contact by phone, occasionally write letters or e-mail and increasingly prefer to communicate by text message. All young people have their social worker’s mobile phone number and if they leave a message in working hours their social worker will aim to respond the same day.

Children's Centres

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much has been spent on children’s centres in each year since 2003. (84789)

The delivery of first phase children’s centres began in 2003-04, with expenditure during this period totalling £2.2 million capital and £1.9 million revenue. For the period 2004-06, local authorities were allocated £111 million revenue and £315 million capital funding for children’s centres.

In addition to this funding, we allocated £313 million capital to Sure Start Local Programmes (SSLP) in 2004-06 and we expect that most of this budget would have been used to facilitate SSLPs to become children’s centres.

Class Sizes

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what estimate he has made of class sizes in (a) primary and (b) secondary schools in (i) rural and (ii) non-rural areas in each year since 1997; and if he will make a statement. (84635)

The information requested is shown in the table.

Maintained primary and secondary schools1: average size of one teacher classes 1997-2006—England

Maintained primary

Maintained secondary

Urban areas

Rural areas

Urban areas

Rural areas

19972

27.8

26.3

21.7

21.5

19983

27.9

26.6

21.7

21.7

19994

27.7

26.3

21.8

21.9

2000

27.4

25.9

22.0

22.0

2001

26.9

25.4

22.0

22.1

2002

26.6

24.9

21.9

22.0

2003

26.6

24.9

21.9

22.0

2004

26.5

25.0

21.8

22.0

2005

26.5

25.0

21.6

21.9

2006

26.6

25.0

21.4

21.7

1 Includes middle schools as deemed 2 Excludes three primary schools for which there is no urban/rural indicator 3 Excludes six primary schools for which there is no urban/rural indicator 4 Excludes three primary and three secondary schools for which there is no urban/rural indicator. Source: Schools Census

Deaf Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many and what proportion of deaf 11-year-olds achieved level 4 at Key Stage 2 in (a) reading, (b) writing and (c) mathematics in (i) West Lancashire and (ii) Lancashire in each year since 1996. (83559)

We cannot provide information relating specifically to deaf pupils. However, in 2004 information on type of Special Educational Need (SEN) was collected for the first time via the Pupil Level Annual School Census for those pupils at “School Action Plus” and with statements of SEN. The “type of SEN” indicator includes a category for those pupils with Hearing Impairment, and information for the pupils who have Hearing Impairment listed as their primary SEN is provided in the following table. Other pupils with statements of SEN or School Action Plus who may have a hearing impairment but for whom this is not listed as their primary SEN are not included in this table.

KS2 achievements for 11-year-old pupils1 at School Action Plus and with statements of SEN, with hearing impairments as their Primary SEN, in all maintained schools, 2003/04 to 2004/052

Lancashire LA3

England

2004/05

2003/04

2004/05

2003/04

Number of eligible 11-year-old pupils4 in reading

48

31

1,486

970

Number achieving level 4+ in reading5

30

17

911

478

Percentage achieving level 4+ in reading

62.5

54.8

61.3

49.3

Number of eligible 11-year-old pupils4 in writing

48

31

1,486

970

Number achieving level 4+ in writing5

24

8

565

309

Percentage achieving level 4+ in writing

50.0

25.8

38.0

31.9

Number of eligible 11-year-old pupils4 in maths

48

31

1,503

975

Number achieving level 4+ in maths5

29

15

793

426

Percentage achieving level 4+ in maths

60.4

48.4

52.8

43.7

1 Number of KS2 eligible pupils with a valid result.

2 Including attempts and achievement in previous academic years.

3 Figures for West Lancashire have not been provided as the number of pupils involved is too small.

4 Numbers relate to pupils with a statement of SEN or School Action Plus and with hearing impairment as their primary SEN who were eligible for the KS2 test.

5 Maths results are checked by schools as part of the checking exercise for the Primary School Achievement and Attainment Tables. Reading and writing results are not checked by schools.

Departmental Publications

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills if he will list the unnumbered Command Papers produced by his Department in each Session since 1976; by what means (a) hon. Members and (b) members of the public can (i) inspect and (ii) obtain copies; and if he will make a statement. (81293)

Documents which are laid before Parliament as unnumbered Command Papers are generally restricted to Explanatory Notes to Treaties, Explanatory Memorandum to Statutory Instruments and some Treasury Minutes. All other documents are published in the numbered Command Papers series.

A complete list of unnumbered Command Papers can only be produced at disproportionate cost.

Copies of all unnumbered Command Papers are made available via the Vote Office.

Departmental Staff (Sickness Absence)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 7 June 2006, Official Report, column 644W, on departmental staff, how many members of staff in his Department have had two or more periods of sickness of less than five days in both of the years for which he provided figures. (84034)

In 2005,1,264 members of staff had two or more periods of sickness of less than five days; in 2004, the number was 1,389. In addition, there were 1,461 in 2003.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 7 June 2006, Official Report, column 644W, on departmental staff, why there are no records of the number of periods of sickness absence of less than five days prior to 2004. (84035)

I am now able to give the information requested for 2003. It is set out in the following table.

2003

Periods of sick leave of less than five days

Number of staff

2

677

3

384

4

201

5+

219

Total

1,481

Edison Schools

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what (a) meetings Ministers have held and (b) correspondence Ministers have exchanged with Edison Schools in the last two years. (81716)

Lord Andrew Adonis had a breakfast meeting with Chris Whittle of Edison Schools on 1 December. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no other meetings or correspondence between Ministers and Edison Schools. A visit was made to Thorpe Bay School, Southend, by the then Secretary of State my right hon. Friend the Member for Bolton, West (Ruth Kelly) in January 2006. Thorpe Bay School has benefited from school improvement support from Edison, but we are not aware that the Secretary of State met any Edison representative on this occasion.

Education Funding

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the total recurrent funding per pupil was in real terms for each local education authority in each year from 1998-99 to 2006-07. (84909)

Environmental Standards

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills whether his Department (a) is committed to the achievement of environmental management to ISO 14001 standard and (b) has been externally certified as in compliance with that standard; and if he will make a statement. (81182)

The New Framework for Sustainable Development in Government (the framework) targets mandate Government to have Environmental Management Systems based, or modelled upon, a recognised system.

The Department has commissioned consultants to introduce a Sustainable Operations Management System (SOMS) into all DfES HQ buildings in this financial year.

The new system will be based upon the ISO 14001:2004 standard but is not currently required to achieve accreditation to that standard.

Further Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many students from the London borough of Bexley applied for (a) university, (b) college and (c) other further education places in (i) 2003-04 and (ii) 2004-05. (84875)

Information on applicants to undergraduate courses is collected by the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS). The figures cover students who apply to full-time courses via UCAS, but they exclude students who apply to part-time courses and those who apply for full-time courses directly to institutions.

Data on the number of students living in the London borough of Bexley applying to full time undergraduate courses through UCAS are given in the table.

There is no comparable central organisation which processes applications for further education courses; students apply directly to the relevant FE institution.

Applicants from the London borough of Bexley applying through UCAS for full time undergraduate courses at UK institutions

Year of entry

Applicants

2003 entry

1,314

2004 entry

1,273

Source:

Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS)

In terms of the students from Bexley actually enrolling on courses, the available information covering enrolments at English further education institutions and full-time and part-time undergraduate entrants at UK higher education institutions is given in the table.

Students1 from the London borough of Bexley at further and higher education institutions

Type of Institution

2003/04

2004/05

Learners at FE institutions:

General FE and tertiary

4,880

9,170

Sixth form college

30

90

Other college

245

370

External institution

1,495

2,940

Entrants to HE institutions

2,060

2,135

1 Covers students on both full-time and part-time courses.

Council (LSC) Individualised Learner record (ILR).

HE entrant figures are on a HESA Standard Registration Population basis.

Figures have been rounded to the nearest 5.

Source:

Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) student record data and the Learning and Skills Council.

Gap Years

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what research his Department has commissioned on a potential link between the taking of gap years and university non-completion rates. (84639)

The Department has not commissioned any research in recent years which was specifically focused on the potential link between taking gap years and university non-completion rates. However, there have been two studies in the past four years which provide relevant information.

The first, “Dropping Out: A Study of Early Leavers from Higher Education” (DfES, RR386, December 2002), surveyed around 1,500 early leavers from HE. Just under a quarter cited “mistaken choice of course” as the most important influence on withdrawal. The survey also noted that:

“Many respondents felt that they had been pushed by their schools to enter university. They instead felt that they would have benefited from a year out of education to think about their choices more carefully and to enter HE with greater maturity.”

The second, “Review of Gap Year Provision” (DfES, RR555, July 2004), provided a comprehensive summary and analysis of existing literature and research into gap years. It noted a range of benefits of gap years to individuals, employers and society. These included “improved educational performance”. However, it did identify a couple of studies which suggested that

“a break in academic work and routine may have negative effects on motivation and progress.”

It noted that some university careers support services make reference to this and offer advice on how gap year applicants might address this on arriving at university.

GCSE

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what percentage of pupils achieved nine or more grade A passes at GCSE in each year since 1997, broken down by type of secondary school. (84246)

The following table shows the percentage of 15-year-old pupils1 achieving nine or more GCSEs at grade A or A* in each year since 1997, broken down by school type2.

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Community School

1.2

1.4

1.7

1.9

1.9

2.0

1.9

2.0

2.3

Voluntary Aided School

2.3

2.4

3.7

4.3

4.3

4.7

4.9

5.2

5.8

Voluntary Controlled school

2.7

3.0

3.7

4.4

4.4

4.4

4.6

4.7

5.9

Foundation School

2.8

3.4

3.3

4.1

4.1

4.4

4.6

4.8

5.1

City Technology College

2.5

2.4

2.5

3.8

3.8

4.4

4.3

5.2

5.3

City Academy

0.0

0.3

0.2

Community Special School

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Foundation Special School

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Non Maintained Special School

0.2

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.5

0.3

0.5

0.5

Independent Special School3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Independent School

14.7

16.9

18.6

20.1

20.1

20.8

21.6

21.7

22.4

Hospital School and PRU4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

All Schools

2.6

3.0

3.4

3.9

3.9

4.0

4.1

4.3

5.1

1 Pupils aged 15 at the start of the academic year, i.e. 31 August. 2 Institution type as recorded through secondary school achievement and attainment tables. 3 Independent special school approved to take pupils with special educational needs. 4 Including community and foundation hospital schools and pupil referral units.

Gifted and Talented Students

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many children from each school in Brent are members of the National Academy for Gifted and Talented Youth Scheme. (85429)

The number of members of National Academy for Gifted and Talented Youth (NAGTY) in each maintained school in Brent is set out in the following table. Membership of NAGTY is available to pupils aged 11-19 in the top 5 per cent. of the ability range.

Brent local authority area schools

NAGTY members

Academy

Capital City Academy

18

Secondary—community

Wembley High Technology College

28

Secondary—foundation

Alperton Community School

2

Claremont High School

0

Copeland (A Specialist Science Community College)

18

John Kelly Boys' Technology College

0

John Kelly Girls' Technology College

48

Kingsbury High School

32

Preston Manor High School

92

Queen's Park Community School

66

Secondary—voluntary aided

Cardinal Hinsley High School

0

Convent of Jesus and Mary Language College

36

JFS School

5

St. Gregory RC High School

68

Total NAGTY membership in Brent

413

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what provision his Department makes for the development of gifted and talented students. (84800)

The Department has a wide-ranging strategy in place to improve gifted and talented education with national support provided by the National Academy for Gifted and Talented Youth (NAGTY) at the University of Warwick. The recent White Paper “Higher Standards, Better Standards, Better Schools for All” sets out the next stages of this programme, including development of a national register of gifted and talented pupils and an expert teacher in every secondary school and for every group of primary schools.

Individual Learning Accounts

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much was spent on individual learning accounts in each year from the scheme's inception to its closure; how many accounts were set up in each year; and if he will make a statement. (85556)

As at November 2001, some 2.6 million individuals in England had opened an individual learning account through the national framework launched in September 2000. Of these, over 347,000 were opened during 2000. (Prior to the launch of the national framework, over 200,000 members applied via TECs, of whom, nearly 80,000 transferred their membership to the national framework and are included in the overall total.)

Total expenditure to the point of closure was £261 million, the majority representing payments to learning providers but also including Capita contract payments, development pilots and other related programme costs. The Department paid learning providers £223 million from the inception of the scheme to its closure. £31.1 million of this was paid during 2000 and £191.9 million during 2001.

Key design principles of the national ILA framework were to encourage more people into learning by helping to tackle the financial barriers to learning and to allow people to take responsibility for their own learning. ILAs were not intended to be a guarantee of quality for learning or learning providers. Nevertheless, many account holders who used their account to book a course stated that the learning met or exceeded their expectations (York Consulting Research Report 295). The Government initially made the decision to withdraw the programme in light of an increasing number of complaints. Subsequently, Ministers closed the programme early because of the compelling and growing evidence of abuse.

Kings Copse Primary School

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what criteria have been taken into account in the advice of the school playing field advisory panel not to redevelop the Kings Copse primary school, in Hedge End, Southampton; what account was taken of educational provision for Hedge End as a whole; and if he will make a statement. (85949)

The Government remain committed to protecting school playing fields. In this respect there is a general presumption against the need to change the current pattern of school playing field provision by disposal or change of use. However, some playing fields can be genuinely surplus and it can make sense to allow them to be sold and the proceeds used to provide new or improved sports or education facilities.

In the first instance, applications to dispose of school playing fields are considered by the independent school playing fields advisory panel. Each application is considered against strict criteria. Briefly, these fall under three headings which can be described as schools’ needs, community use, and finance.

In this particular case, the panel considered that Hampshire county council's application in respect of Kings Copse primary school failed to demonstrate how the schools’ needs and finance criteria would be met.

In accordance with normal procedure Hampshire county council will be given an opportunity to address the panel's concerns at its next meeting on 7 September 2006.

Learning and Skills Council

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of Learning and Skills Council funded learners aged over 19 years are studying for a (a) level 1, (b) level 2, (c) level 3, (d) level 4 and (e) other qualifications; and what proportion are not studying for a qualification. (81803)

The Learning and Skills Council (LSC) funds learning which is (a) for externally accredited qualifications, (b) for qualifications which are not externally accredited (e.g. college certificated) and (c) non-qualification based.

It is possible to distinguish learning programmes by level—even where that learning is non-qualification based. That is shown in the table which gives the number (in thousands) and proportion of learners aged 19 and over on LSC funded Further Education (FE), Work Based Learning (WBL) and Adult and Community Learning (ACL —now know as personal and community development learning (PCDL)) provision in 2004-05.

Highest qualification level of learner

WBL learners (thousand)

WBL (percentage)

FE learners (thousand)

FE (percentage)

ACL learners (thousand)

ACL (percentage)

Level 1 and Entry

3

1

1,489

43

814

91

Level 2

118

52

968

28

58

7

Level 3

103

45

475

14

14

2

Level 4, 5 and HE

3

1

70

2

0

0

Level not specified

0

0

475

14

4

0

However, it is not possible to fully distinguish between qualification and non-qualification based learning across all LSC funded learning. Non-accredited learning is currently funded mainly through safeguard personal and community development funding (PCDL), but also within WBL and FE. In WBL, Entry to Employment (a programme of other training and life skills for learners not in employment) has been introduced in response to the Cassells Review of Modern Apprenticeships. Funding for internally certificated learning is also available through FE institutions. Additionally, courses co-financed with European funding are not necessarily qualification based.

However, in 2004-05 it is estimated that 39 per cent. of FE learners and 98 per cent. of PCDL learners were taking non-externally accredited courses (which could be either qualifications which are not externally accredited or non-qualification based).

Missing Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many children born abroad have gone missing from local authority care in each of the last three years. (82617)

[holding answer 5 July 2006]: Information about the numbers of unaccompanied asylum seeking children who have been looked after from 2002 to 2005 and the numbers of these who have gone missing from their agreed care placement for more than 24 hours is shown in the following table.

Number of unaccompanied asylum seeking children (UASC) looked after and number with at least one missing placement in the years ending 31 March 2003-051,2

Number of UASC looked after

Number with at least one missing placement1

2002-03

2,400

50

2003-04

2,900

70

2004-05

2,900

90

1 A ‘missing’ placement is defined as a child being absent from their agreed placement for over 24 hours. 2 Children looked after who went missing more than once in the years ending 31 March 2003 until 2005 were only counted once. Notes: 1. Figures exclude any children whose asylum seeking status ceased before going missing. 2. For the purpose of preserving confidentiality, national figures have been rounded to the nearest 100 if they exceed 1,000 and to the nearest 10 otherwise.

Local authorities may also be responsible for looking after other foreign nationals from time to time. Data about this group of children, in terms of missing from placement data by foreign country of birth, are not collected centrally.

Outdoor Learning

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) when he expects to publish guidance for schools on safety and education outside the classroom; (84748)

(2) what recent discussions his Department has had with teaching unions about outdoor learning and pupil safety.

We expect to publish the Education Outside the Classroom Manifesto in the new school term. It will contain information about good safety management, and references to other relevant documents. A number of teaching unions responded to the public consultation on the draft vision and aims for the Education Outside the Classroom Manifesto that ran from November 2005 to February 2006. We will consult them further on next steps in relation to safety guidance once the manifesto is published.

Out-of-school Clubs

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much has been spent on out-of-school clubs as part of the National Childcare Strategy in each year since 1997; how many clubs received funding in each year; how often children attended such clubs in each year; and if he will make a statement. (85467)

As part of the National Childcare Strategy, the Department has made funding available to local authorities since 1999 for childcare provision of a range of types, including out-of-school clubs. However, information on expenditure specifically for out-of-school clubs, or attendance at such clubs, is not held centrally.

Overseas Students

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many students from (a) mainland China, (b) Hong Kong, (c) Macao, (d) Taiwan and (e) Singapore are estimated to be studying in the United Kingdom. (84701)

The latest available information is given in the table:

Students from Selected Countries1 Enrolled at UK Higher Education Institutions, 2004/05

Country

Number

China (People's Republic of)

52,680

Hong Kong

10,780

Macao

145

Taiwan

5,880

Singapore

3,630

1 Refers to the country of the student's permanent or home address prior to entry to the programme of study. Notes: 1. Figures are on a HESA Standard Registration Population basis. 2. Figures have been rounded to the nearest 5. Source: Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) student record data.

Parliamentary Questions

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many parliamentary questions tabled to his Department were awaiting a reply on 10 July 2006; which of those had been waiting longer than (a) two and (b) three weeks for a reply; and what the reason for the delay was in each case. (85203)

The Department's parliamentary question tracking system is unable to break down the data as requested. The answer could be supplied only at a disproportionate cost.

Departments aim to ensure that Members receive a substantive response to their named day question on the named day, and endeavour to answer ordinary written questions within a working week of being tabled.

Pathfinder Grants

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the value of Government pathfinder grants offered to Greater London local authorities was in (a) 2004 and (b) 2005, broken down by local authority. (84376)

The following table shows the value of significant Government pathfinder grants offered to Greater London authorities by the DfES in 2004 and 2005. In some cases resource was allocated over two years and separate figures for the two years are not available.

Pathfinder grants made available to Greater London authorities by DfES in 2004-05 and 2005-061

£

Enterprise learning pathfinders2

Key stage 2 language pathfinders2

15-19 pathfinders3 (academic year)

Building schools for the future pathfinders4

Early support pathfinders

Local authority

2004-05

2004-05

2004-05

2005-06

2005-06

2004-06

Barking and Dagenham

0

88,150

0

0

0

200,000

Barnet

38,000

0

0

0

0

0

Bexley

3,500

0

0

0

0

0

Brent

36,200

0

0

0

0

0

Bromley

116,571

0

0

0

0

158,900

Camden

0

0

0

0

0

0

City of London

0

0

0

0

0

0

Croydon

50,000

0

0

0

0

0

Ealing

0

0

0

0

0

200,000

Enfield

0

100,000

0

0

0

236,000

Greenwich

130,000

0

0

0

3213,025,000

0

Hackney

185,000

0

0

0

0

0

Hammersmith and Fulham

18,000

0

0

0

0

0

Haringey

72,000

0

0

0

0

0

Harrow

0

0

384,778

0

0

159,000

Havering

11,000

0

0

0

0

235,000

Hillingdon

0

0

0

0

0

0

Hounslow

110,940

0

0

0

0

0

Islington

0

0

369,084

242,000

0

0

Kensington and Chelsea

0

0

0

0

0

0

Kingston upon Thames

76,770

0

0

0

0

0

Lambeth

15,000

0

0

0

0

0

Lewisham

10,200

0

250,000

0

498,985.000

0

Merton

24,000

0

0

0

0

200,000

Newham

64,500

0

265,000

0

0

0

Redbridge

63,400

0

0

0

0

0

Richmond upon Thames

0

159,165

0

0

0

0

Southwark

0

0

705,700

372,000

0

0

Sutton

0

0

0

0

0

294,000

Tower Hamlets

210,500

0

659,591

0

0

0

Waltham Forest

0

0

0

0

0

200,000

Wandsworth

75,000

0

0

0

0

0

Westminster

67,828

0

560,000

0

0

0

Total London

1,378,409

347,315

3,194,153

614,000

312,010,000

1,882,900

1 No money was paid out for diversity pathfinders in either year. 2 Pathfinder ended in 2004-05. 3 Partly paid through Learning and Skills Council. 4 Pathfinder began in 2005-06. Notes: 1. Includes £116 million of PFI credits. 2. Includes £58 million of PFI credits.

Primary Teachers

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills whether there is an oversupply of qualified primary school teachers. (86009)

On a national basis there is no evidence of oversupply, but there will of course be differences between regions. The table shows that most regions do have vacancies for primary teachers.

A survey conducted by the Training and Development Agency for Schools this year among 6,590 newly qualified primary teachers showed that 95 per cent. had teaching jobs.

This Department periodically reviews the need for teachers in future years and this informs the number of training places that will be offered. The model takes account of such factors as falling pupil rolls, retirements and teachers returning to the profession after having children.

Table 4: Full-time vacancy1 rates in LA maintained nursery and primary schools in England by grade and Government Office Region: January of each year

Vacancies as a percentage of teachers in post2

Number of vacancies

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006(p)

2006 (p)

All vacancies

0.6

0.8

0.8

0.8

1.2

1.0

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.4

700

Grade3,4

Head or Deputy/Assistant

0.9

1.4

13

1.0

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.7

0.8

0.8

280

Head

0.6

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.8

0.7

0.5

0.5

0.7

0.7

130

Deputy head/Assistant head

1.3

2.0

1.7

1.3

1.8

1.2

1.1

1.0

0.8

0.9

150

Classroom teacher

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

1.2

1.1

0.6

0.4

0.4

0.3

420

Government Office Region

North East

0.4

0.4

0.5

0.3

0.6

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.3

0.3

30

North West

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

60

Yorkshire and the Humber

0.1

0.4

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.8

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.4

70

East Midlands

0.4

0.5

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.5

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.3

50

West Midlands

0.2

0.4

0.7

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.5

0.4

0.4

0.3

70

East of England

0.7

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.7

1.6

0.8

0.6

0.5

0.5

90

London5

1.7

2.5

2.3

2.0

3.3

2.4

1.7

1.0

1.0

1.0

250

South East

0.8

0.8

0.8

1.0

1.6

1.1

0.8

0.4

0.3

0.3

70

South West

0.5

0.6

0.4

0.7

0.6

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

30

England excluding London

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.6

0.9

0.8

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.3

460

Total vacancies (numbers)

1,090

1,390

1,370

1,420

2,110

1,800

1,110

780

740

700

(p) Provisional 1.Advertised vacancies for full-time permanent appointments (or appointments of at least one term's duration). Includes vacancies being filled on a temporary basis of less than one term. 2 Teachers in post include full-time qualified regular teachers in (or on secondment from) maintained nursery and primary schools, plus the primary portion of full-time regular divided service, peripatetic, advisory and miscellaneous teachers. 3.The number of teachers in post by grade is from the 618g survey for 2001 onwards, previous years were estimated using the Database of Teacher Records. 4 The role of assistant head was created in 2001. 5 The 2006 vacancy rates for the inner and the outer London weighting areas are 1.3 per cent. and 0.6 per cent. respectively, (in 2005 they were 1.2 per cent and 0.8per cent). Totals may not appear to equal the sum of the component parts because of rounding. Source: 618g survey

Private Finance Initiative

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills by what total amount private finance initiative projects, for which his Department is responsible, that went over budget did so in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. (83651)

The Department for Education and Skills does not itself undertake private finance initiative (PFI) projects. PFI projects for the provision of schools are delivered through contracts between local authorities and private sector contractors.

There are currently 100 such projects with signed contracts covering over 800 schools. The names, locations and other details of these schools can be accessed at www.teachernet.gov.uk/pfi.

A key aspect of the private finance initiative is that the risk of projects going over budget in the construction phase is transferred to the private sector contractor and we do not have information on any such costs that may have accrued to various private sector contractors for this reason. The public sector does not pay anything until the contracted services are available and thereafter payments are linked to satisfactory performance and availability.

School Meals

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) what steps he is taking to reduce the quantity of trans fats present in school meals; (84714)

(2) whether he has set a maximum limit for the amount of trans fats to be present in school meals.

[holding answer 12 July 2006]: The School Meals Review Panel considered the need for a specific standard for trans-fatty acids to be included within their proposals, and concluded against imposing a specific standard for the following reasons:

Evidence shows that adult intakes of trans-fatty acids are well below the maximum threshold level for health;

Adopting a standard to limit the fat content of school meals would contribute towards controlling levels of trans-fatty acids; and

Food-based standards would include restrictions on foods which tend to be higher in trans-fatty acids (for example, savoury snacks and confectionery).

The School Food Trust supported the panel's view that their proposals would sufficiently control trans- fatty acids, and that there was no need to develop a specific standard for trans-fatty acids which had the potential to complicate the new standards unnecessarily, making it more difficult for schools and local authorities to implement them.

School Places Appeals

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many appeals have been made by parents to Milton Keynes council in each of the last five years over the award of school places; and how many of these appeals were successful. (84918)

[holding answer 13 July 2006]: The information requested is shown in the table.

Appeals lodged by parents against non-admission of their children to maintained primary and secondary schools—each academic year: 2000-01 to 2004-05—Milton Keynes local authority area

Maintained primary

Appeals heard

Appeals decided in parents favour

Admission appeals lodged by parents

Number1

Percentage

Number

Percentage2

2000/01

50

39

78.0

17

43.6

2001/02

132

87

65.9

25

28.7

2002/03

78

53

67.9

11

20.8

2003/04

80

60

75.0

20

33.3

2004/05

101

63

62.4

31

49.2

Maintained secondary

Appeals heard

Appeals decided in parents favour

Admission appeals lodged by parents

Number

Percentage1

Number

Percentage2

2000/01

230

207

90.0

92

44.4

2001/02

125

90

72.0

29

32.2

2002/03

227

205

90.3

90

43.9

2003/04

200

170

85.0

50

29.4

2004/05

424

371

87.5

127

34.2

1 Number of appeals heard by a committee expressed as a percentage of the number of appeals lodged by parents. 2 Number of appeals decided in parents' favour expressed as a percentage of the number of appeals heard by a committee. Source: Schools Census and Admission Appeals Survey

School Staff (Assaults)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many assaults on school staff were recorded in each local education authority in the last year for which figures are available; and what each figure represents in terms of assaults on staff per thousand pupils. (83989)

[holding answer 10 July 2006]: The number of assaults on school staff is not collected centrally.

For the academic year 2004/05, information is available on the reasons for pupil exclusions. These reasons include “physical assault against an adult”. A local authority breakdown of the number of pupils who have been excluded from school (permanently or for a fixed period) for physical assault against an adult, together with total numbers of exclusions, is given in the following table.

Maintained primary, secondary and special schools1,2. Permanent and fixed period exclusions for physical assault against an adult3 and total number of exclusions (all reasons) numbers and rates per thousand pupils 2004/05: by local authority area

Permanent exclusions

Number of pupils on roll4

Exclusions for physical assault against an adult

Exclusions per 1,000 pupils5

Total number of exclusions (all reasons)

Total exclusions per 1,000 pupils5

England

7,606,040

1,270

0.2

9,400

1.2

North East

398,660

90

0.2

460

1.2

841

Darlington

15,404

6

6

30

2.2

840

Durham

75,863

16

0.2

90

1.2

390

Gateshead

28,840

10

0.3

30

1.1

805

Hartlepool

16,035

6

6

20

1.4

806

Middlesbrough

20,165

8

0.4

20

0.9

391

Newcastle upon Tyne

37,260

17

0.5

60

1.7

392

North Tyneside

30,600

7

7

30

0.9

929

Northumberland

50,547

9

0.2

70

1.4

807

Redcar and Cleveland

24,083

7

20

1.0

393

South Tyneside

23,762

12

0.5

40

1.9

808

Stockton-on-Tees

30,857

8

0.3

20

0.7

394

Sunderland

45,241

6

6

20

0.3

North West

1,086,590

240

0.2

1,440

1.3

889

Blackburn with Darwen

24,603

6

6

30

1.2

890

Blackpool

21,190

9

0.4

60

2.8

350

Bolton

45,797

6

0.1

60

1.4

351

Bury

28,254

6

6

30

1.2

875

Cheshire

104,163

30

0.3

170

1.6

909

Cumbria

76,831

11

0.1

60

0.8

876

Halton

18,910

6

6

50

2.4

340

Knowsley

26,438

8

0.3

40

1.4

888

Lancashire

173,101

62

0.4

270

1.6

341

Liverpool

73,239

6

6

80

1.1

352

Manchester

65,644

27

0.4

80

1.3

353

Oldham

40,513

7

0.2

40

1.0

354

Rochdale

34,820

7

40

1.1

355

Salford

32,960

16

0.5

90

2.6

343

Sefton

45,132

7

7

30

0.7

342

St. Helens

28,272

0

0.0

7

356

Stockport

40,944

9

0.2

50

1.2

357

Tameside

36,731

12

0.3

60

1.7

358

Trafford

35,964

6

6

20

0.5

877

Warrington

32,137

6

0.2

50

1.4

359

Wigan

48,712

12

0.2

70

1.4

344

Wirral

52,231

6

6

60

1.2

Yorkshire and the

806,660

150

0.2

840

1.0

370

Barnsley

34,496

6

6

7

7

380

Bradford

86,686

7

0.1

60

0.7

381

Calderdale

34,765

7

7

50

1.3

371

Doncaster

50,302

17

0.3

90

1.8

811

East Riding of Yorkshire

50,036

6

0.1

30

0.6

810

Kingston Upon Hull, City

39,262

34

0.9

80

2.1

382

Kirklees

63,113

8

0.1

60

1.0

383

Leeds

111,538

24

0.2

120

1.1

812

North East Lincolnshire

26,023

7

60

2.4

813

North Lincolnshire

25,047

0

0.0

0

0.0

815

North Yorkshire

88,139

9

0.1

60

0.7

372

Rotherham

45,113

7

0.1

30

0.6

373

Sheffield

75,753

16

0.2

100

1.3

384

Wakefield

52,231

7

7

50

1.0

816

York

24,159

7

40

1.7

East Midlands

667,600

160

0.2

970

1.5

831

Derby

37,832

14

0.4

90

2.2

830

Derbyshire

115,455

19

0.2

140

1.2

856

Leicester

47,168

22

0.5

80

1.7

855

Leicestershire

96,577

20

0.2

130

1.4

925

Lincolnshire

102,884

20

0.2

180

1.8

928

Northamptonshire

103,694

34

0.3

140

1.3

892

Nottingham

38,195

17

0.4

70

1.9

891

Nottinghamshire

120,891

18

0.2

150

1.2

857

Rutland

4,907

0

0.0

0

0.0

West Midlands

864,790

120

0.1

1,060

1.2

330

Birmingham

175,226

37

0.2

360

2.1

331

Coventry

49,307

6

6

10

0.1

332

Dudley

50,251

7

0.1

90

1.8

884

Herefordshire

24,005

7

0.3

30

1.1

333

Sandwell

50,581

7

70

1.3

893

Shropshire

40,761

7

7

40

0.9

334

Solihull

36,360

7

0.2

60

1.6

860

Staffordshire

128,800

20

0.2

140

1.1

861

Stoke-on-Trent

36,594

6

6

10

0.4

894

Telford and Wrekin

26,491

10

0.4

40

1.5

335

Walsall

48,005

7

30

0.5

937

Warwickshire

76,698

10

0.1

150

1.9

336

Wolverhampton

40,675

6

6

20

0.4

885

Worcestershire

81,031

6

6

30

0.3

East of England

842,380

110

0.1

930

1.1

820

Bedfordshire

63,800

11

0.2

130

2.0

873

Cambridgeshire

77,582

6

6

10

0.1

881

Essex

201,078

45

0.2

200

1.0

919

Hertfordshire

174,931

12

0.1

240

1.4

821

Luton

31,075

7

30

1.0

926

Norfolk

113,477

7

7

100

0.8

874

Peterborough

28,680

6

6

30

1.0

882

Southend-on-Sea

27,270

7

7

40

1.4

935

Suffolk

101,555

20

0.2

150

1.5

883

Thurrock

22,936

20

0.9

London

1,060,180

160

0.2

1,510

1.4

Inner London

360,840

60

0.2

420

1.2

202

Camden

21,565

6

6

10

0.6

201

City of London8

224

n/a

n/a

6—

6—

204

Hackney

25,572

7

7

30

1.1

205

Hammersmith and Fulham

17,102

6

6

20

0.9

309

Haringey

33,565

7

0.2

30

0.8

206

Islington

22,694

7

7

10

0.4

207

Kensington and Chelsea

10,664

7

7

20

1.6

208

Lambeth

28,220

0

0.0

40

1.5

209

Lewisham

34,117

6

6

20

0.7

316

Newham

48,646

9

0.2

80

1.7

210

Southwark

33,760

6

0.2

40

1.1

211

Tower Hamlets

36,728

7

0.2

40

1.1

212

Wandsworth

28,286

7

50

1.9

213

Westminster

19,693

6

6

30

1.7

Outer London

699,350

110

0.2

1,090

1.6

301

Barking and Dagenham

31,005

13

0.4

50

1.5

302

Barnet

45,939

13

0.3

60

1.2

303

Bexley

39,513

7

7

60

1.6

304

Brent

39,396

15

0.4

90

2.2

305

Bromley

46,894

6

6

60

1.2

306

Croydon

49,099

7

100

2.1

307

Ealing

41,644

7

0.2

80

1.9

308

Enfield

49,670

6

6

60

1.2

203

Greenwich

36,303

19

0.5

110

3.0

310

Harrow

28,772

6

6

50

1.8

311

Havering

36,568

40

1.1

312

Hillingdon

42,027

7

7

60

1.4

313

Hounslow

35,840

0

0.0

80

2.1

314

Kingston upon Thames

21,431

6

6

10

0.3

315

Merton

23,547

7

30

1.4

317

Redbridge

44,622

7

7

60

1.3

318

Richmond upon Thames

20,108

0

0.0

20

1.1

319

Sutton

31,277

6

6

30

0.8

320

Waltham Forest8

35,692

n/a

n/a

60

1.7

South East

1,161,570

160

0.1

1,400

1.2

867

Bracknell Forest

15,119

6

6

40

2.8

846

Brighton and Hove

29,961

11

0.4

40

1.2

825

Buckinghamshire

75,866

7

50

0.6

845

East Sussex

66,612

16

0.2

110

1.7

850

Hampshire

173,289

17

0.1

160

0.9

921

Isle of Wight

19,586

6

6

10

0.4

886

Kent

212,811

26

0.1

360

1.7

887

Medway

43,998

6

0.1

50

1.2

826

Milton Keynes

36,186

6

0.2

50

1.4

931

Oxfordshire

85,281

6

0.1

40

0.4

851

Portsmouth

24,722

6

0.2

20

0.8

870

Reading

16,522

7

0.4

30

1.6

871

Slough

20,274

6

6

10

0.5

852

Southampton

28,576

9

0.3

30

1.1

936

Surrey

140,069

19

0.1

150

1.1

869

West Berkshire

24,626

6

6

30

1.3

938

West Sussex

105,642

12

0.1

160

1.5

868

Windsor and Maidenhead

18,984

6

6

30

1.6

872

Wokingham

23,444

7

7

40

1.5

South West

717,610

70

0.1

780

1.1

800

Bath and North East Sor

25,161

6

6

40

1.6

837

Bournemouth

20,891

6

6

20

1.1

801

Bristol, City of

46,702

6

6

50

1.1

908

Cornwall

73,227

7

7

120

1.6

878

Devon

97,698

7

7

60

0.7

835

Dorset

55,849

7

7

50

0.8

916

Gloucestershire

85,937

12

0.1

90

1.0

420

Isles of Scilly

251

0

0.0

0

0.0

802

North Somerset

28,141

6

6

20

0.6

879

Plymouth

39,243

7

0.2

40

1.1

836

Poole

19,305

6

6

20

1.0

933

Somerset

71,328

12

0.2

70

1.0

803

South Gloucestershire

39,981

6

6

70

1.7

866

Swindon

28,735

6

0.2

30

1.0

880

Torbay

19,625

6

6

10

0.7

865

Wiltshire

65,540

11

0.2

90

1.3

Fixed period exclusions

Numbers of pupils on roll4

Exclusions for physical assault against an adult

Exclusions per 1,000 pupils5

Total number of exclusions (all reasons)

Total exclusions per 1,000 pupils5

England

7,606,040

18,480

2.4

389,560

51.2

North East

398,660

830

2.1

17,580

44.1

841

Darlington

15,404

78

5.1

1,430

92.5

840

Durham

75,863

145

1.9

4,800

63.3

390

Gateshead

28,840

41

1.4

710

24.7

805

Hartlepool

16,035

10

0.6

590

36.9

806

Middlesbrough

20,165

37

1.8

730

36.3

391

Newcastle upon Tyne

37,260

106

2.8

1,930

51.7

392

North Tyneside

30,600

50

1.6

760

24.8

929

Northumberland

50,547

98

1.9

2,450

48.4

807

Redcar and Cleveland

24,083

44

1.8

880

36.4

393

South Tyneside

23,762

49

2.1

1,070

44.9

808

Stockton-on-Tees

30,857

120

3.9

1,050

34.1

394

Sunderland

45,241

54

1.2

1,180

26.1

North West

1,086,590

2,700

2.5

56,720

52.2

889

Blackburn with Darwen

24,603

108

4.4

1,400

56.7

890

Blackpool

21,190

63

3.0

1,440

67.8

350

Bolton

45,797

133

2.9

3,000

65.4

351

Bury

28,254

68

2.4

1,780

62.9

875

Cheshire

104,163

249

2.4

6,270

60.2

909

Cumbria

76,831

139

1.8

5,460

71.0

876

Halton

18,910

27

1.4

570

29.9

340

Knowsley

26,438

110

4.2

1,030

38.8

888

Lancashire

173,101

476

2.7

9,480

54.8

341

Liverpool

73,239

95

1.3

1,830

25.0

352

Manchester

65,644

358

5.5

4,420

67.3

353

Oldham

40,513

91

2.2

2,640

65.1

354

Rochdale

34,820

87

2.5

1,780

51.2

355

Salford

32,960

102

3.1

1,980

60.0

343

Sefton

45,132

27

0.6

540

11.9

342

St. Helens

28,272

42

1.5

1,410

49.9

356

Stockport

40,944

102

2.5

2,350

57.4

357

Tameside

36,731

107

2.9

2,420

65.9

358

Trafford

35,964

50

1.4

1,260

34.9

877

Warrington

32,137

74

2.3

2,070

64.3

359

Wigan

48,712

174

3.6

2,580

53.0

344

Wirral

52,231

22

0.4

1,040

19.9

Yorkshire and the

806,660

2,340

2.9

47,650

59.1

370

Barnsley

34,496

71

2.1

1,430

41.4

380

Bradford

86,686

236

2.7

4,100

47.2

381

Calderdale

34,765

91

2.6

1,660

47.8

371

Doncaster

50,302

149

3.0

3,090

61.4

811

East Riding of Yorkshire

50,036

100

2.0

2,550

51.0

810

Kingston Upon Hull, City

39,262

288

7.3

3,110

79.1

382

Kirklees

63,113

197

3.1

3,780

59.9

383

Leeds

111,538

368

3.3

7,610

68.2

812

North East Lincolnshire

26,023

99

3.8

2,310

88.8

813

North Lincolnshire

25,047

71

2.8

1,940

77.3

815

North Yorkshire

88,139

164

1.9

3,610

40.9

372

Rotherham

45,113

164

3.6

2,220

49.3

373

Sheffield

75,753

157

2.1

5,090

67.2

384

Wakefield

52,231

138

2.6

3,800

72.7

816

York

24,159

48

2.0

1,360

56.2

East Midlands

667,600

1,790

2.7

34,610

51.8

831

Derby

37,832

99

2.6

2,600

68.6

830

Derbyshire

115,455

226

2.0

5,000

43.3

856

Leicester

47,168

108

2.3

3,030

64.2

855

Leicestershire

96,577

167

1.7

4,080

42.3

925

Lincolnshire

102,884

257

2.5

4,470

43.4

928

Northamptonshire

103,694

381

3.7

6,280

60.5

892

Nottingham

38,195

241

6.3

2,260

59.3

891

Nottinghamshire

120,891

300

2.5

6,730

55.7

857

Rutland

4,907

9

1.8

160

32.4

West Midlands

864,790

2,170

2.5

41,210

47.7

330

Birmingham

175,226

505

2.9

8,300

47.4

331

Coventry

49,307

142

2.9

1,470

29.9

332

Dudley

50,251

66

1.3

2,840

56.5

884

Herefordshire

24,005

62

2.6

1,500

62.6

333

Sandwell

50,581

120

2.4

2,170

42.8

893

Shropshire

40,761

93

2.3

2,230

54.7

334

Solihull

36,360

70

1.9

1,680

46.3

860

Staffordshire

128,800

172

1.3

5,700

44.3

861

Stoke-on-Trent

36,594

136

3.7

2,410

65.8

894

Telford and Wrekin

26,491

284

10.7

2,320

87.5

335

Walsall

48,005

127

2.6

2,770

57.6

937

Warwickshire

76,698

119

1.6

3,020

39.4

336

Wolverhampton

40,675

55

1.4

1,260

31.1

885

Worcestershire

81,031

221

2.7

3,530

43.6

East of England

842,380

1,650

2.0

40,860

48.5

820

Bedfordshire

63,800

115

1.8

2,520

39.5

873

Cambridgeshire

77,582

89

1.1

2,510

32.3

881

Essex

201,078

472

2.3

12,210

60.7

919

Hertfordshire

174,931

249

1.4

6,730

38.5

821

Luton

31,075

72

2.3

1,250

40.1

926

Norfolk

113,477

177

1.6

5,620

49.5

874

Peterborough

28,680

54

1.9

1,490

51.8

882

Southend-on-Sea

27,270

132

4.8

1,480

54.4

935

Suffolk

101,555

214

2.1

5,310

52.3

883

Thurrock

22,936

71

3.1

1,750

76.3

London

1,060,180

2,490

2.3

42,850

40.4

Inner London

360,840

1,110

3.1

14,110

39.1

202

Camden

21,565

69

3.2

1,020

47.2

201

City of London8

224

0

0.0

7

204

Hackney

25,572

143

5.6

1,240

48.6

205

Hammersmith and Fulham

17,102

55

3.2

810

47.3

309

Haringey

33,565

121

3.6

1,650

49.1

206

Islington

22,694

87

3.8

530

23.2

207

Kensington and Chelsea

10,664

25

2.3

340

32.0

208

Lambeth

28,220

34

1.2

1,090

38.7

209

Lewisham

34,117

103

3.0

1,310

38.5

316

Newham

48,646

39

0.8

1,140

23.4

210

Southwark

33,760

119

3.5

1,240

36.6

211

Tower Hamlets

36,728

100

2.7

1,260

34.2

212

Wandsworth

28,286

157

5.6

1,580

55.7

213

Westminster

19,693

61

3.1

910

46.4

Outer London

699,350

1,370

2.0

28,740

41.1

301

Barking and Dagenham

31,005

79

2.5

820

26.6

302

Barnet

45,939

86

1.9

1,490

32.5

303

Bexley

39,513

53

1.3

1,720

43.4

304

Brent

39,396

108

2.7

1,860

47.3

305

Bromley

46,894

40

0.9

1,950

41.7

306

Croydon

49,099

94

1.9

1,310

26.6

307

Ealing

41,644

68

1.6

2,000

48.1

308

Enfield

49,670

110

2.2

2,050

41.3

203

Greenwich

36,303

227

6.3

2,750

75.6

310

Harrow

28,772

47

1.6

1,090

37.9

311

Havering

36,568

44

1.2

1,820

49.9

312

Hillingdon

42,027

65

1.5

1,140

27.0

313

Hounslow

35,840

0

0.0

1,270

35.5

314

Kingston upon Thames

21,431

15

0.7

700

32.8

315

Merton

23,547

77

3.3

1,280

54.3

317

Redbridge

44,622

29

0.6

450

10.0

318

Richmond upon Thames

20,108

22

1.1

900

45.0

319

Sutton

31,277

43

1.4

1,440

46.1

320

Waltham Forest8

35,692

167

4.7

2,690

75.3

South East

1,161,570

2,810

2.4

67,820

58.4

867

Bracknell Forest

15,119

18

1.2

670

44.4

846

Brighton and Hove

29,961

147

4.9

2,210

73.6

825

Buckinghamshire

75,866

123

1.6

2,410

31.8

845

East Sussex

66,612

262

3.9

5,940

89.1

850

Hampshire

173,289

449

2.6

11 ,730

67.7

921

Isle of Wight

19,586

47

2.4

1,010

51.5

886

Kent

212,811

353

1.7

11,900

55.9

887

Medway

43,998

139

3.2

2,830

64.3

826

Milton Keynes

36,186

32

0.9

1,140

31.4

931

Oxfordshire

85,281

221

2.6

4,310

50.5

851

Portsmouth

24,722

209

8.5

2,980

120.6

870

Reading

16,522

69

4.2

1,050

63.3

871

Slough

20,274

32

1.6

540

26.5

852

Southampton

28,576

159

5.6

2,890

101.1

936

Surrey

140,069

210

1.5

7,110

50.8

869

West Berkshire

24,626

38

1.5

1,580

64.1

938

West Sussex

105,642

228

2.2

5,800

54.9

868

Windsor and Maidenhead

18,984

20

1.1

700

36.9

872

Wokingham

23,444

49

2.1

1,050

44.7

South West

717,610

1,710

2.4

40,280

56.1

800

Bath and North East Sor

25,161

40

1.6

1,800

71.7

837

Bournemouth

20,891

45

2.2

1,120

53.4

801

Bristol, City of

46,702

297

6.4

5,610

120.1

908

Cornwall

73,227

85

1.2

3,160

43.2

878

Devon

97,698

201

2.1

5,680

58.1

835

Dorset

55,849

39

0.7

1,680

30.2

916

Gloucestershire

85,937

123

1.4

3,490

40.6

420

Isles of Scilly

251

0

0.0

0

0.0

802

North Somerset

28,141

94

3.3

1,440

51.2

879

Plymouth

39,243

96

2.4

1,390

35.5

836

Poole

19,305

69

3.6

1,340

69.2

933

Somerset

71,328

206

2.9

4,310

60.4

803

South Gloucestershire

39,981

67

1.7

2,360

59.0

866

Swindon

28,735

143

5.0

2,190

76.0

880

Torbay

19,625

79

4.0

970

49.4

865

Wiltshire

65,540

126

1.9

3,750

57.3

n/a = not available. 1 Includes middle schools as deemed. 2 Includes maintained special schools, excludes non—maintained special schools. 3 The distribution of exclusions by reason has been derived from the Termly Exclusions survey and applied to the number of permanent exclusions as confirmed by LEAs as part of the Schools census checking exercise. 4 The number (headcount) of all pupils (excluding dually registered pupils) in January 2005. 5 The number of exclusions in 2004/05 divided by how many thousands of pupils were on roll in January 2005. 6 Less than 3, or a rate based on less than 3. 7 Less than 5, or a rate based on less than 5. 8 The reasons for permanent exclusions are not available for Waltham Forest and City of London. Notes: 1. National and regional totals and total number of exclusions have been rounded to the nearest 10.

2. Totals may not appear to equal the sum of component parts because numbers have been rounded to the nearest 10.

Schools (Employee Vetting)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what guidance his Department gives schools on the subject of vetting potential employees; and what changes to this guidance are planned should the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill be passed. (84517)

Pre-appointment vetting checks are necessary to ensure that people who are appointed to work with children are safe to do so. My Department's guidance to schools on the vetting of potential employees is contained in “Child Protection: Preventing Unsuitable People from Working with Children in the Education Service” (May 2002) and “Criminal Records Bureau: Managing the Demand for Disclosures” (December 2002).

As the Secretary of State announced on 20 June, we are preparing consolidated guidance to replace these documents. This will be issued for consultation shortly.

The guidance will be further revised in the light of the requirements placed on schools by the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill.

Schools Sports

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what criteria Ofsted uses to assess school sporting provision. (81590)

This is a matter for Ofsted. HM Chief Inspector, Maurice Smith, has written to my hon. Friend and a copy of his reply has been placed in the Library.

Letter from Maurice J. Smith dated 5 July 2006:

Your recent parliamentary question has been passed to me, as Her Majesty's Chief Inspector, for reply.

You asked what criteria Ofsted use to assess school sporting provision.

Since September 2005 Ofsted's school inspections have focused on the school's overall effectiveness. During one of these inspections Ofsted inspects sports provision in a very general way as part of the inspection of the quality of education provided. There is not a specific focus on physical education unless it is a particularly important subject in the school. Schools with specialist sports college status, for example, will have their distinctive aims and characteristics taken into account and the extent to which the specialist aims are met.

Every child matters: The Framework for the inspection of schools in England from September 2005 sets out the principles for school inspections. The guidance outlines what inspection will cover and the work that inspectors need to do. This common inspection schedule for schools and other post-1 provision is supported by non-statutory guidance, published in two parts:

Guidance on using the schedule

Guidance on conducting inspections.

The Guidance on using the schedule contains specific criteria and benchmarks to support inspectors in knowing where to pitch their judgments. Equally, they should be an aid to schools in the process of self-evaluation. The amount of evidence on physical education will vary according to the priorities and focus of the inspection.

In addition to section five inspections, Ofsted has a new subject inspection programme which, in the case of physical education, involves 30 primary and 30 secondary schools each year. Every third year a report on physical education is published using the accumulated evidence from these visits. The first is due in 2008. General guidance is provided for the HMI and additional inspectors who are involved with this programme. Ofsted is currently developing subject-specific guidance which exists in draft form. The contents are intended to help inspectors and all other staff to evaluate standards and achievement, quality of provision, leadership and management and other factors that might have a bearing on what learners achieve in physical education. For example, when reporting on the standards achieved by pupils in physical education inspectors:

interpret test, examination results and awards gained by pupils

judge the standards of work seen, highlighting what pupils do well and could do better

evaluate how well pupils are achieving, evaluating standards by the ends of the different key stages and highlighting any differences in achievement for different groups of pupils.

During the inspection, an inspector's view of standards is supplemented by:

examining pupils' targets in physical education and the basis on which they were set and progress towards achieving them any performance trends over time

identifying strengths and weaknesses in attainment against the knowledge, skills and understanding set out in the National Curriculum attainment target.

Grade characteristics are illustrated in order to help inspectors make judgments. For example, when judging standards in physical education to be good, inspectors will look for the following characteristics:

Standards achieved in examination courses are good, above national averages or as reflected in contextual value added. Standards show upward trends over time. Learners' skills, knowledge and understanding in most of the four aspects of the attainment target and across most areas of activity are good. The progress of the great majority of learners, across key stages, is good and for some it is very good, and show that almost all achieve well compared with their prior attainment and ability in physical education, and compared with those in similar schools.

When making judgements on standards and achievement, inspectors will also look for evidence on the 10 high quality outcomes promoted by the Physical Education, School Sport and Club Links (PESSCL) strategy.

Most subject inspections focus on a specific subject issue, identified from the previous inspection, performance data or as part of a specific survey on, for example, the PESSCL strategy. For the subject 'issue' being inspected, a single grade is required and for this the general grade criteria have been interpreted in terms of the particular issue. Guidance pages are provided for each issue to support grading.

A copy of this reply has been sent to Jim Knight and will be placed in the Library of both Houses.

Sign Language

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what provision there is for British sign language in the school curriculum; and what plans he has for changes to that provision. (85370)

British sign language is not recognised as a foreign language for the purposes of the national curriculum, or for the prospective entitlement for pupils learning a language at Key Stage 2. Schools may, however, choose to offer pupils the opportunity to study British sign language over and above the national curriculum requirements. We have no plans to change this.

Somali Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what estimate he has made of the number of Somali children in (a) primary and (b) secondary education in each education authority in England. (84949)

The requested information is not held centrally.

As part of the Pupil Level Annual Schools Census (PLASC), schools are required to record ethnicity data to reflect the main categories used in the 2001 National Population Census. Children of Somali ethnic origin are recorded under the category of “Black African”. Following a consultation exercise in 2002, local authorities (LAs) were given the option of using extended ethnicity categories in their schools if they felt that the main ones did not meet their local management needs. The extended ethnicity categories do include a separate “Somali” code but not all LAs have chosen to use the extended categories. The majority of authorities use a mixture of main and extended codes and, therefore, the Department does not hold complete data for the extended ethnic background categories.

Specialist School Teachers

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) what estimate his Department has made of the number of vacancies for trained specialist school teachers in (a) English, (b) mathematics, (c) science, (d) modern languages and (e) information and communications technologies in rural areas in the most recent period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement; (84964)

(2) how many (a) vacancies and (b) temporary replacements there were for head teachers in (i) rural and (ii) non-rural areas in the most recent period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement.

The information requested is not available in the required format because vacancy level information is collected from a local authority rather than a school level survey and it is not possible to define which of these vacancies are in schools in rural and non-rural areas or which relate to specialist schools.

Table 1 provides the number of full-time classroom teacher vacancies in local authority maintained secondary schools in England in English, mathematics, science, languages and information technology in January 2006.

Table 1: Full-time classroom teacher vacancy1 rates in local authority maintained secondary schools in England by subject, January 2006

2Number of vacancies 2006

English

160

Mathematics

190

All sciences

210

Languages

40

Information Technology

90

1 Advertised vacancies for full-time permanent appointments (or appointments of at least one term’s duration). Includes vacancies being filled on a temporary basis of less than one term.

2 Provisional.

Figures are rounded to the nearest 10.

Source:

Survey of teachers in service and teacher vacancies, (618g)

Table 2 shows the number of full-time head teacher vacancies and full-time temporarily filled head teacher posts in local authority maintained schools in England in January 2006. For comparison with table 1, it also shows figures for maintained secondary schools only.

Table 2: Full-time head teacher vacancies and full-time temporarily filled head teacher posts in local authority maintained schools in England, January 20062

All maintained schools

Maintained secondary schools

Full-time head teacher vacancies

180

30

Full-time temporarily filled head teacher posts1

660

80

1 Temporarily-filled full-time permanent appointments. The definition used is wider than the vacancy definition (bullet points (b) and (c) below are in addition to the normal vacancy definition). A post is included in this row of the table:

a. where there is no incumbent who is expected to return to the post;

b. whether or not filled on a temporary basis, i.e. either without a contract or on a contract of les than one year;

c. whether or not advertised;

d. where an appointment has been made by not yet taken up.

2 Provisional

Figures are rounded to the nearest 10.

Source:

Survey of teachers in service and teacher vacancies, (618g)

Student Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what guidance has been given to employers regarding the repayment of income-contingent student loans; and if he will make a statement. (84693)

Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issues a booklet entitled “Collection of Student Loans”, which outlines an employer's responsibilities in relation to making student loan deductions from pay and tables which show how much they should deduct. This guidance is available in hardcopy or employers can access it via HMRC's employer website. Employers are also able to obtain help and further guidance from the HMRC Employer Helpline and face-to-face advice is available at regular HMRC employer events.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many graduates contacted the Student Loans Company because they believe they were paying too much of their income-contingent student loan back in the last year for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement. (84695)

The information requested is not available. While the Student Loans Company does record information about categories of inquiries made by customers at individual account level, it is unable to provide a global picture to this level of detail.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many graduates are repaying student loans on a self-assessment basis; and if he will make a statement. (84696)

As at June 2006, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) reports that 5,4001 borrowers are recorded as repaying on a self-assessment basis (self-employed). An additional 80,7001 borrowers are recorded as repaying under both PAYE and self-assessment arrangements (self-assessment and in employment). These figures reflect the status at the point at which HMRC originally matched the borrowers to taxpayer records.

1 Numbers are rounded to the nearest hundred.

Student Numbers

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills which local authorities had an increase in the number of students in (a) Key Stage 3 and (b) Key Stage 4 between 2001 and 2005. (85776)

The available information has been placed in the Library.

This shows that 83 local authorities have reported an increase in the number of pupils in the Key Stage 3 age group between 2001 and 2005; and over the same period, 126 local authorities have reported an increase in the number of pupils in the Key Stage 4 age group.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of students continued full-time education after the age of 16 years from comprehensive secondary schools of (a) fewer than 100, (b) 100-199, (c) 200-299, (d) 300-399, (e) 400-499, (f) 500-599, (g) 600-700 and (h) over 700 students in (i) rural areas and (ii) non-rural areas in the last period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement. (85946)

This information is not available. The Youth Cohort Study (YCS) estimates that overall 70 per cent. of young people in England who had attended a comprehensive school in year 11 in 2002/03 were in full-time education in the spring following completion of compulsory education. Neither the breakdown by size of school or rural/non-rural area is available from the YCS.

Teacher Recruitment

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much was spent on Government media advertisements and promotional activities seeking to attract people to the teaching profession in each of the last five years. (86013)

The costs below relate to the costs of advertising media and include TV, press, radio, magazine, online and outdoor advertising. All costs include VAT.

£

2001-2002

6,648,414

2002-2003

7,761,572

2003-2004

8,620,899

2004-2005

7,815,576

2005-2006

8,101,055

The key advertising objective is to increase the number of able and committed people recruited to teaching, particularly in the secondary priority subjects (mathematics, sciences, modern languages, religious education, music, design and technology and information and communications technology). The last five years have seen successive increases in the numbers of people entering initial teacher training.

Newly Qualified Teachers

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many newly qualified teachers had not taken up full-time teaching posts one year after qualification in each of the last five years. (86010)

Information on the number of newly qualified teachers in service is available for March of each year. The latest information available is March 2004. The following table provides the number of teachers who attained qualified teacher status (QTS) in each year from 1999 to 2003 and the number of those who were not in full-time service in March of the following year. This number will include those in part time service.

The proportion of qualifiers without teaching service usually falls substantially over the first year or two after qualification, and in the long-term has been around 9-10 per cent.

Teachers gaining qualified teacher status (QTS)1 in England: 1999 to 2003, service position in March of the following year.Calendar year of qualification1999200020012002120031,2Total gaining QTS324,19021,88021,87023,05024,580Of these4:In full-time maintained sector service in England 16,59015,69016,65017,51017,510In full-time service elsewhere5920790730800900Not in full-time service6.6905.,3904,4904,7406,1701 Provisional data 2 Numbers in service are likely to be underestimated due to the late receipt of service information. 3 Excludes teachers qualifying through employment based routes. 4The service position shown is at the first March following the year of qualification. 5 In service in Wales or Further and Independent sector service in England and Wales. Source: Database of Teacher Records

Teachers (Bristol)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many full-time equivalent qualified teachers were employed within (a) primary and (b) secondary schools in Bristol local education authority in (i) 1996-97 and (ii) the most recent school year for which figures are available. (84610)

The table shows the full-time equivalent number of regular qualified teachers who were employed in maintained nursery/primary and secondary schools in Bristol local authority in January 1997 and 2005, the latest information available. The table also shows figures for England for comparison.

It is anticipated that local authority level information for January 2006 will be published in September.

Full-time equivalent regular qualified teachers in maintained nursery and primary and secondary schools in Bristol local authority and England in January 1997 and 2005

Nursery/primary

Secondary

Bristol

England

Bristol

England

1997

1,540

190,660

1,120

187,660

2005

1,390

189,920

1,070

204,080

Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest 10. Source: Survey of teachers in service and teacher vacancies, (618g)

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what percentage of teaching posts were filled by supply, temporary and agency teachers in (a) primary and (b) secondary schools in Bristol local education authority in (i) 1996-97 and (ii) the most recent school year for which figures are available. (84611)

The information requested is not available in the required format because the number of teaching posts in Bristol local authority is not collected centrally.

The table provides the number of occasional teachers (on contracts of less than one month) who were employed in maintained nursery/primary and secondary schools in Bristol local authority and England in January 1997 and 2005, the latest information available. The full-time equivalent number of regular qualified teachers is also provided.

It is anticipated that local authority level teacher numbers for January 2006 will be published in September.

Number of occasional teachers (on contracts of less than one month) and full-time equivalent regular qualified teachers in maintained nursery/primary and secondary schools in Bristol local authority and England in January 1997 and 2005

Nursery/primary

Secondary

Occasional teachers1

FTE regular qualified teachers2

Occasional teachers1

FTE regular qualified teachers2

Bristol

England

Bristol

England

Bristol

England

Bristol

England

1997

110

8,310

1,540

190,660

60

4,390

1,120

187,660

2005

90

8,570

1,390

189,920

40

5,700

1,070

204,080

1 2005 figures include occasional teachers without qualified teacher status (QTS).

2 Excludes occasional teachers. Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest 10. Source: Survey of teachers in service and teacher vacancies, (618g)

University for Industry

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much has been spent on the University for Industry in each year since it opened; how many people graduated in each year; and if he will make a statement. (85557)

Figures for 2001-02 onwards are:

£ million

2001-02

153.7

2002-03

164.9

2003-04

239.6

2004-05

181.9

2005-06

1209.4

2006-07

2176.3

1 Estimated outturn 2 Planned

Full details of UFI funding are available only from 2001-02 onwards. Prior to 2001-02 funding was made available through the FEFC, for which we do not hold information. UFI (initially called the “University for Industry”), the organisation responsible for learndirect, has successfully pushed the boundaries of learning methods, by making innovative use of technology to make learning more flexible. It is the largest Government supported e-learning initiative in the world, and provides high quality learning for the post-16 learning and skills sector. It particularly reaches those with few or no skills and qualifications who are unlikely to participate in more traditional forms of learning. It is not an awarding body and does not have the status of a university.

Since 1999, more than 2 million people have improved their skills either at a learndirect centre, from work, or from their home computer. Since April 2003, over 120,000 people have achieved their first skills for life test pass in literacy or numeracy through learndirect. UFI is now delivering over one fifth of the post-19 sector’s skills for life test passes annually. Almost 200,000 small and medium sized employers have also used learndirect services. The learndirect advice service has delivered more than 33 million information and advice sessions on the telephone and online.

Defence

Access to Work Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many disabled staff in his Department received support through the Access to Work scheme (a) in each of the last five years and (b) in 2006-07. (82224)

The Ministry of Defence makes full use of the Access to Work scheme in assessing the needs of its disabled staff for reasonable adjustments in the workplace. However, it does not collect the numbers of disabled staff receiving adaptations and equipment paid for by Access to Work, and this information could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Afghanistan

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what progress International Security Assistance Force forces have made in implementing the NATO counter-narcotics operation in Afghanistan agreed in November 2005. (83218)

Under the terms of NATO's operational plan for the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), ISAF forces can provide, within means and capabilities, training and operational support to Afghan counter-narcotics forces. But they are not there to take direct action against the drugs trade or to eradicate opium poppy in the fields; that is a job for the Afghan Government.

Airborne Stand Off Radar

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many aircraft equipped with Airborne Stand Off Radar are in service. (84575)

Aircraft Carriers

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on progress regarding the Future Aircraft Carrier programme. (84548)

I refer the hon. Member to the written ministerial statement made by my right hon. Friend the then Secretary of State for Defence on 14 December 2005, and to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Wellingborough (Mr. Bone) on 6 February 2006, Official Report, column 824W, which outlined the major steps taken in our plans for the future aircraft carriers including details of our co-operation with France.

My noble Friend Lord Drayson, the Minister for Defence Procurement, subsequently announced that on 13 April the Aircraft Carrier Alliance signed a formal Alliance Agreement and individual works contracts totalling more than £140 million to continue to refine and mature all aspects of the ship design and its equipment, including mission systems. These contracts and the Alliance Agreement cover the key demonstration phase of the work and involve shipyards and industry in maturing the design to the point at which we can commit to manufacture. When we are satisfied that all this work is sufficiently mature, the main investment decision can be taken and orders placed. At this point, we will also set the in-service dates.

Approved Projects

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many approved projects fell into each approval category in 2005-06; and what the aggregated approved expenditure was for each category. (84433)

The following table details the number of approved projects that fell into categories A to C in 2005-06 and the aggregated approved expenditure for each category.

Category

Number of projects

Aggregated approved expenditure (£ million)

A

43

20,247

B

29

954

C

32

456

Records on category D approvals are not held centrally and the information requested could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Armed Forces Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the written statement of 11 July 2006, Official Report, columns 60-61WS, on armed forces invaliding pensions, what his Department’s policy is on the payment of interest on underpaid (a) pay and (b) pensions. (85743)

Any claims for compensation as a result of incorrect payments are considered in accordance with Government accounting procedures. The general principle adopted is that the individual may be recompensed where it can be shown that a financial loss has occurred through maladministration.

Those affected by the pension error that I announced on 11 July 2006, Official Report, columns 60-61 WS, will receive, in addition to any back payments due, interest in accordance with Government accounting rules. The Department is currently considering whether any additional recompense should be paid when the errors are corrected.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the written statement of 11 July 2006, Official Report, columns 60-61WS, on armed forces invaliding pensions, what research his Department has undertaken into the proposed merger of the Armed Forces Personnel Administration Agency and the Veterans Agency; what his assessment is of the (a) advantages and (b) disadvantages of such a merger; and what assessment he has made of the likely effect of such a merger on Joint Personnel Administration. (85744)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the written statement of 11 July 2006, Official Report, columns 60-1WS, on armed forces invaliding pensions, when the error was found; what assessment he has made of the likelihood of further errors being uncovered; and what his estimate is of the financial liability arising from the errors. (85745)

The error was found while making payments to rectify pension errors under Projects Haven and Scribe during the period 2003-06. As these projects moved towards a conclusion, specialist resources were freed up to scope this new problem. In view of the work that has been done to review pension files, the likelihood of further errors being uncovered is low, and robust arrangements have been put in place to prevent similar problems occurring in the future.

The total pension arrears payable are estimated to be some £8.8 million plus interest, and I shall be considering as a matter of priority whether additional recompense is appropriate.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what his assessment is of the impact of increased life expectancy on the integrity and affordability of the Armed Forces Pension Scheme; and if he will make a statement. (85115)

New entrants to the armed forces on or after 6 April 2005 have joined the new Armed Forces Pension Scheme 2005. The impact of recent improvements in life expectancy was fully taken into account in developing the benefit structure of this scheme, including by setting a preserved pension age at 65. There have also been changes to the benefit structure of the old pension scheme, the Armed Forces Pension Scheme 1975, to ensure its long term affordability. The age at which a preserved pension is paid was delayed from 60 to 65 for all service, from 6 April 2006. Some of these savings were reinvested in the scheme in the form of an increase in the death in service lump sum to three times pay. The impact of changing life expectancy and other relevant factors is monitored by the Government Actuary's Department, the actuary for the schemes, through regular assessments of the employer's contribution for the two AFPS schemes.

Army Continuous Attitude Survey

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 20 June 2006, Official Report, column 1708W, on the Army Continuous Attitude Survey, why the categories included in question 66 of the seventh Serving Personnel survey ‘I didn’t believe anything would be done if I did complain’ and ‘I thought that it would cause problems in my workplace’ have been omitted from the ninth Serving Personnel survey. (84895)

I refer the hon. Gentleman to my answer of 6 July 2006, Official Report, column 1352W. Whereas question 66 in the seventh Serving Personnel survey provided a menu of possible responses, question 39c in the ninth Serving Personnel survey is an open-ended question, and does not offer a menu of responses. This approach is designed to provide a richer source of data by enabling respondents to answer the question in their own terms. The breakdown of negative comments in my answer of 6 July reflects an analysis of actual responses to question 39c conducted by occupational scientists. A sample of respondents’ comments was extracted and similar types were summarised into a category. Categories were arranged under appropriate headings to provide a coding framework, which was validated using a further sample of comments. Respondents typically made more than one comment and all comments were read and assigned the relevant code(s) to calculate their frequencies.

Army Personnel (Basing)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many Army personnel are based in each Government office region of England. (84437)

The strength of United Kingdom regular forces posted in the UK by Government office region is available in tri-service publication (TSP) 10—UK Regular Forces Distribution Across UK.

TSP 10 is published quarterly; the most recent publication shows the numbers of service personnel at 1 April 2006.

Copies of TSP 10 are held in the House of Commons Library and are also available at www.dasa.mod.uk.

Bearskins

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 12 June 2006, Official Report, column 996W, on bearskins, what research is taking place into producing alternatives to real bearskin; who is undertaking the research; and what the time scale is for completion of research contracts. (85293)

At present the Ministry of Defence does not have a research contract for producing an alternative to real bearskin. A number of contracts have previously been let with commercial companies but none of these produced a useable product. A faux-fur sample has, however, been submitted by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and this is currently being assessed for its suitability.

Chinook ZD 576 (Mull of Kintyre Crash)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish the reports into (a) incident signal 21/4/94 from No. 1 ECU (Engine) sent to Fleetlands for investigation, (b) incident signal 17/5/94 from No. 1 ECU (Engine) sent to third/fourth line for investigation and (c) incident signal 26/5/04 of the engine change units in the engines of Chinook ZD 576 in the weeks prior to the crash on the Mull of Kintyre on 2 June 1994; and whether these reports are consistent with the problems recorded in the aircraft log. (86019)

Officials need to research archived records and I will therefore write to the right hon. Member and place a copy of my letter in the Library of the House.

Colombia

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to his answer of 3 July 2006, Official Report, column 703W, on Colombia, what types of explosive device training are being provided with UK military assistance. (85300)

The type of training provided includes de-mining training and training in improvised explosive device disposal.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 10 May 2006, Official Report, column 298W, on Colombia, for what reasons listing the financial value of bespoke counter- narcotics training provided to Colombia would damage (a) the safety of individuals, (b) the prevention and detection of crime and (c) international relations; and if he will make a statement. (83758)

The bespoke counter-narcotics training provided by the Ministry of Defence is in support of HMG's wider engagement with Colombia on counter- narcotics matters.

Providing further information on this issue could endanger the safety of individuals and reduce the effectiveness of the Colombian law enforcement mission by raising the public profile of this counter- narcotics work, including in Colombia. It would also be contrary to the wishes of the Colombian authorities.

Combat Troops

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many combat troops have been provided by each contributing nation to (a) Operation Enduring Freedom and (b) the International Security Assistance Force. (84802)

The Commanding Officer of the International Security Assistance Force has confirmed that he has the forces required to do the job asked of him. The precise composition of the force package provided by nations in support of either Operation Enduring Freedom or the International Security Assistance Force is a matter for the nations concerned.

Comprehensive Spending Review

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether a new strategic defence review will be conducted before the forthcoming comprehensive spending review. (85112)

CRV 7 Multi-Purpose Sub Munition

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) whether the UK attack helicopters in Afghanistan are equipped with the CRV 7 Multi-Purpose Sub Munition; (83978)

(2) what use has been made of the CRV 7 Multi-Purpose Sub Munition in combat in each of the last 10 years.

The Multi-Purpose Sub Munition variant of the CRV 7 system is one of the weapons systems available for use by Apache Mk 1 Attack Helicopters in Afghanistan.

As at 10 July 2006 no use has been made of the CRV 7 Multi Purpose Sub Munition in combat by any element of UK armed forces since it came into service in 2003.

Defence Food Supply Contract

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to his written statement of 27 June 2006, Official Report, column 5WS, on the Defence Food Supply Contract, what percentage of the meat supplied to British troops will be from British farms. (83933)

The new food supply contact will commence on 1 October 2006. Transitional arrangements are still being discussed with the contractor, Purple Foodservice Solutions. At this stage we are therefore unable to provide the information requested.

Defence Information Structure

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many additional payments have been agreed with the contractors for the Defence Information Infrastructure project since the contract was issued; to whom such payments (a) have been made and (b) are to be made; how much has been paid and on what dates; and if he will make a statement. (83716)

All payments in respect of Increment 1 of the DII contract are and will be made to EDS as the prime contractor for DII. Payments are made through the service delivery charges of the contract. These charges are commercially sensitive and cannot be disclosed.

A range of changes to the Defence Information Infrastructure programme have taken place since contract award in March 2005. A level of change was always expected and is allowed for under the provisions of the contract. In terms of the overall value of Increment 1 of the DII contract the value of these changes is not significant.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the original (a) estimated costs and (b) in service delivery date were for the Defence Information Infrastructure project; and what the current situation is in each case. (83717)

Increment 1 of the Defence Information Infrastructure contract was awarded to the ATLAS Consortium, led by EDS, in March 2005 with an estimated value of £2.3 billion. This estimated value remains extant. There is no “in service delivery date” as such within the contract. The contracted “New Services Commencement Date” was originally March 2006. This date was subsequently revised to May 2006 and was met successfully.

Helicopters

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many military helicopter flights there were in the airspace above the constituency of Hammersmith and Fulham in each of the last three years; and if he will make a statement. (84421)

This information is not centrally held. Although individual units hold details of all flight paths undertaken by their own helicopters this information is not centrally collated and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the (a) actual and (b) required number of helicopter crew personnel are for each regiment of the Army Air Corps. (84545)

The number of actual and required helicopter crew personnel for each regular regiment of the Army Air Corps (AAC) is as follows:

Regiment

Helicopter Crew Established (Required)

Helicopter Crew Held (Actual)

1 Regt AAC

60

54

3 Regt AAC

85

57

4 Regt AAC

85

63

5 Regt AAC

93

64

9 Regt AAC

85

69

These figures include qualified helicopter instructors and regimental headquarters personnel, whose primary role is not as helicopter crew. The figures do not include aviation crewmen, such as air door gunners and winch operators, because this is not a long-term Career Employment Group. The established figure for 5 Regiment AAC will reduce to 31 by 1 April 2007, as part of the planned reductions in Northern Ireland. The deficits shown in the table in 3,4 and 9 Regiments AAC are mainly due to the re-roling of these regiments to Apache helicopters. As a consequence of re-roling, some aircrew are posted away for retraining.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the availability of spare engines for each type of helicopter in service with the armed forces. (85904)

The number of spare engines held by the Ministry of Defence differs for each helicopter type and is determined by a number of factors including the size of the fleet, the scheduled training flying hour requirement, industrial considerations (e.g. the lead time to procure an engine) and operational requirements. At any one time, some engines may be undergoing repair and maintenance. We currently have sufficient spare engines to meet operational and training requirements for each helicopter type.

HMS Argyll

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence why HMS Argyll is not to be modified to operate the Merlin helicopter; and what the intended out-of-service date is for this vessel. (85380)

The operational requirement is for 12 Type 23 frigates to be modified to operate the Merlin helicopter. The decision on which ships are to be modified is determined by the fitting opportunities within the frigate upkeep programme. HMS Argyll will not be modified as the requirement will be met by other frigates with earlier fitting opportunities within the upkeep programme. Should the programme change, the situation will be reviewed. On current plans HMS Argyll is due to be withdrawn from service in 2019.

Meal Budgets

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the budget is per person per day for meals for members of the armed forces serving in (a) Iraq and (b) Afghanistan. (85099)

The budget per person per day for meals for members of the armed forces serving in both Iraq and Afghanistan is currently £3.11 per day (July 2006 rate). It is intended to provide 2,900 calories per day, based on three meals per day. This Daily Messing Rate is based on a “basket” of food items, and is calculated on a monthly basis by applying prices obtained from the main Ministry of Defence Food Supply Contractor to the Home Ration Scale.

Meat Procurement

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of his Department’s procurement policy on (a) beef and (b) lamb for members of the British armed forces serving on the Falkland Islands. (85038)

The procurement of meat in the Falkland Islands is consistent with the Ministry of Defence’s wider procurement policy. In accordance with this policy, contractors are encouraged to purchase British produce whenever it is competitive and consistent with meeting quality standards. The MOD is, however, bound by European legislation, and is required to seek value for money in the Single European Market. The MOD’s Food Supply Contractor sources all meat procured for use by the UK armed forces.

Merchant Naval Ships

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what steps he takes to ensure that wrecks of merchant naval ships lost during hostilities are protected. (84826)

Issues relating to merchant vessels are in the first instance the responsibility of the Department for Transport.

The Ministry of Defence administers the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986, which allows it to protect from unauthorised interference the remains of aircraft and ships lost while in military service.

Whether an individual merchant vessel is eligible for designation under the Act depends on whether it can be said to have been “in military service”. This will be a case-by-case determination, depending on the circumstances of the individual vessel's loss.

Military Afloat Reach and Sustainability Programme

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the (a) out-of-service date is for each Royal Fleet Auxiliary vessel due for decommissioning by 2025 and (b) scheduled in-service date is for each planned new vessel in the Military Afloat Reach and Sustainability programme. (85378)

On current plans the RFA out-of- service dates are as follows:

Date

RFA Sir Tristram

2006

RFA Sir Galahad

2006

RFA Grey Rover

2006

RFA Gold Rover

2009

RFA Brambleleaf

2009

RFA Orangeleaf

2009

RFA Black Rover

2010

RFA Oakleaf

2010

RFA Bayleaf

2010

RFA Sir Bedivere

2011

RFA Fort Rosalie

2013

RFA Fort Austin

2014

RFA Diligence

2014

RFA Fort George

2019

RFA Fort Victoria

2019

RFA Argus

2020

As with all projects, the in-service dates for the vessels in the Military Afloat Reach and Sustainability programme will only be set following the main investment decision. This decision has not yet been taken.

Military Equipment Exports

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether he plans to supply the Government of Colombia with (a) military equipment and (b) other support in each of the next three years. (85294)

The Ministry of Defence does not supply the Colombian armed forces with military equipment. We currently have no plans to alter this policy. I refer the hon. Member to my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State’s reply on 3 July 2006, Official Report, column 703W.

Military Vehicles

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has to purchase mine-protected RG-31 vehicles, or variants thereof, for the Army. (81602)

As my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence announced on 26 June we are conducting a review of the options for protected patrol vehicles to determine what can be done as soon as possible and in the longer term.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the wheelbase dimensions are of (a) the Snatch Land Rover, (b) the RG-31 and (c) variants of the RG-31; and if he will make a statement. (81603)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the dimensions of the (a) Snatch armoured Land Rover, (b) RG-31M and (c) Tempest Truck, the Mine-Protected Vehicle are; what is the time for each vehicle to accelerate from stationary to normal cruising speed; what their maximum speeds are; and what their turning circles are. (80572)

The information requested on Snatch, the Mine Protected Vehicle and RG-31 is:

Vehicle

Length

Width

Height

Max Speed

Acceleration

Turning Circle1

Snatch

4.80m

1.69m

2.37m

lOOkm/h2

Not measured

12.8m

MPV3

6.28m

2.75m

3.04m

80km/h

Not measured

17m

RG-314

6.40m

2.47m

2.84m

100km/h

Not stated

16m

1 Kerb to kerb distance. 2 For Snatch 2; Snatch 1 and 1.5 are slightly less. Since high speed is not a requirement for Snatch, its maximum speed has not been tested precisely. 3 The vehicle chosen to replace Mamba as the Mine Protected Vehicle (MPV) was initially called Tempest but this name is no longer used and the in service vehicle, based on the Cougar vehicle produced by Force Protection Inc, is known simply as MPV. 4 RG-31 is not in service with the UK armed forces, but this data was obtained from BAES during the ongoing review of our patrol vehicle capability.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the cost per track mile excluding crew costs is of operating (a) a Warrior MICV and (b) a RG-31M in Iraqi conditions. (82495)

The full capitation cost for the Warrior Armoured Fighting Vehicle (all variants) based on peacetime usage is calculated for financial year 2006-07 as £154.04 per kilometre. Specific operational track mile data is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. The Ministry of Defence does not own any RG-31M vehicles.

Phoenix UAV

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much the Phoenix unmanned aerial vehicle has cost since the programme’s inception. (84268)

The Phoenix unmanned aerial vehicle system has cost approximately £345 million since inception.

Premature Voluntary Releases

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many premature voluntary release exits there were from the regular (a) infantry, (b) Royal Artillery, (c) Royal Engineers, (d) Royal Corps of Signals, (e) Royal Armoured Corps, (d) Household Cavalry and (e) Royal Electrical Mechanical Engineers in each of the last five years. (85761)

Between 1 April 2001 and 31 March 2006, there were 18, 660 voluntary outflow release exits in these arms/services.

Voluntary outflow exits1 (officers2 and soldiers: 2001-02 to 2005-06

Arm/service

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

Total

The Household Cavalry/Royal Armoured Corps

330

320

330

310

350

1,650

Royal Regiment of Artillery

410

390

430

450

420

2,100

Royal Corps of Engineers

560

500

530

660

660

2,910

Royal Corps of Signals

630

450

400

470

420

2,380

The Infantry

1,600

1,460

1,430

1,460

1,530

7,480

Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers

420

370

440

480

440

2,140

Total

3,950

3,500

3,550

3,830

3,830

18,660

1 The term premature voluntary release (PVR) has been changed to voluntary outflow (VO) although the methodology for producing this information remains the same. voluntary outflow is defined as all exits from trained personnel which are generated by the individual before their time expiry. 2 Figures for officers in the general staff (officers with the rank of colonel or above) are excluded. Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest 10. Due to rounding the totals may not equal the sum of the pans.

Private Land (Military Use)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many private sites are used for military exercises in Herefordshire; and whether rent is paid for use of such sites. (85225)

In financial year 2005-06, 161 sites were used for military training on private land in Herefordshire. So far this financial year, 92 sites have been used of which nine were for adventure training. The military training undertaken on private land in Herefordshire is primarily, though not exclusively, operational in nature rather than being designated exercises.

No rent is paid for military training on private land in Herefordshire, apart from camp site fees which are sometimes paid for adventure training exercises. Fees have been incurred for five of the adventure training exercises that have taken place this year.

The owners’ permission is sought in advance of any training on private land.

Raptor Reconnaissance Pods

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many Raptor reconnaissance pods are fitted to Tornado aircraft. (84585)

There are currently four Reconnaissance Airborne Pod Tornado pods undergoing acceptance flight trials for the Tornado GR4/4A. A further four pods are undergoing maintenance activity with the equipment manufacturer, Goodrich Company.

Recruitment

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many people joined the Army from each Government office region of England in 2005. (84417)

Estimated soldier enlistments for 2005 are shown in the following table:

Government office region

Enlistments

North East

440

North West

1,870

Yorkshire and the Humber

1,160

East Midlands

730

West Midlands

990

East of England

700

London

590

South East

800

South West

860

Notes: 1. Figures have been rounded to the nearest 10. When rounding to the nearest 10, numbers ending in five have been rounded to the nearest multiple of 20 to prevent systematic bias. 2. Figures are based on the location of armed forces career office to which the applicant applied rather than the residence of the applicant. Due to the nature of Army officer recruitment procedures, it is not possible to provide an estimate for the number of Army officers recruited from each Government office region.

Reserve Forces

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has made of the proportion of members of reserve forces who belong to ethnic minorities. (85489)

[holding answer 14 July 2006]: The proportion of ethnic minorities1 in the volunteer reserve forces for 1 April 20062:

Percentage

Tri-Service

4.5

Royal Navy Reserve

2.8

Royal Marines Reserve

2.7

Territorial Army3

4.7

Royal Auxiliary Air Force

3.1

1 Ethnic minority proportions are calculated as a percentage of those personnel for whom we hold a record of ethnic origin, ie excluding those of unspecified ethnic origin. 2 Due to the introduction of a new Personnel Administration System for RAF, all RAF data are for 1 March 2006. 3 Figures include Mobilised TA personnel and University Officer Training Corps but exclude Non Regular Permanent Staff and Full Time Reserve Service personnel.

Royal Navy

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many serving naval (a) engineering mechanics, (b) submariner nuclear watchkeepers and (c) medical assistants there are; and what the requirement is for each category. (85753)

The requirement and numbers serving for engineering ratings, submariner nuclear watchkeepers and medical assistants, as at 1 June 2006, are:

Specialisation

Trained requirement

Trained strength

Untrained strength

Engineering ratings

10,020

9,670

1,580

Submariner nuclear watchkeepers

850

730

0

Medical assistants

680

640

70

Notes: 1. The Navy is currently restructuring the engineering branches, moving from the artificer/mechanic career streams to a single technician stream. This process is in mid transition, so no meaningful figures can be obtained for mechanics alone. The figures provided are for all ratings engineers (mechanics, technicians and artificers). 2. The figures for submariner nuclear watchkeepers are for the petty officer. Chief petty officer and warrant officer 2 ranks of the marine engineer (submariner) specialisations. 3. The figures for medical assistants are for the medical assistant (general service), medical assistant (submariner) and medical assistant (commando) specialisations. 4. The requirement relates to posts that need to be filled by trained personnel. To enable valid comparisons the “numbers serving” figures have been split into trained and untrained. 5. All figures are rounded to the nearest 10. Numbers ending in 5 have been rounded to the nearest multiple of 20 to prevent systematic bias.

Saudi Arabia

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the value was of armaments purchased from the UK by the Government of Saudi Arabia in each year since 1997. (84347)

Statistics on the value of exports of military equipment have been published by country for each year since 1997 in the Annual Report on Strategic Export Controls. It is planned to publish the Annual Report for 2005 towards the end of this month.

Service Children (Education)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what percentage of children in service children's education schools achieved three A-level passes each year since 1997. (83701)

Of the students who sat three or more A-level examinations at service children's education schools since 1997, the following percentages achieved a pass mark graded at A-E in three or more subjects:

Percentage

1997

72

1998

84

1999

78

2000

94

2001

88

2002

98

2003

89

2004

91

2005

94

These figures relate to A-level examinations only and not A-level equivalent examinations which are becoming an increasingly common option for students.

Spectrum Utilisation

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list mobile and fixed linked bands that (a) were and (b) were not subject to spectrum pricing in each financial year from 2004-05. (83353)

The bands subject to spectrum pricing in 2004-05 and 2005-06 and the basis of pricing were as follows:

2004-052005-06

Band Min. (MHz)

Band Max. (MHz)

Pricing Basis

Band Min. (MHz)

Band Max. (MHz)

Pricing Basis

70

70.5

Mobile

70

70.5

Mobile

72.8

74.8

Mobile

72.8

74.8

Mobile

75.2

76.7

Mobile

75.2

76.7

Mobile

78

80

Mobile

78

80

Mobile

84

85

Mobile

83.5

85

Mobile

137

138

Mobile

137

138

Mobile

141.9

143

Mobile

141.9

143

Mobile

149

149.9

Mobile

149

149.9

Mobile

153.5

154

Mobile

153.5

154

Mobile

401

406

Mobile

401

406

Mobile

406.1

410

Mobile

406.1

410

Mobile

410

430

Mobile

410

430

Mobile

430

450

Mobile

430

450

Mobile

870

872

Mobile

870

872

Mobile

876

880

Mobile

876

880

Mobile

915

917

Mobile

915

917

Mobile

921

925

Mobile

921

925

Mobile

1375

1400

Fixed

1375

1400

Fixed

1427

1452

Fixed

1427

1452

Fixed

2025

2070

Fixed

2025

2070

Fixed

2200

2245

Fixed

2200

2245

Fixed

2290

2300

Fixed

Released to Ofcom

2310

2390

Fixed

2310

2390

Mobile

2390

2450

Fixed

2390

2450

Mobile

3400

3600

Fixed

3400

3600

Fixed

4400

5000

Fixed

4400

5000

Fixed

5650

5850

Fixed

5650

5850

Fixed

7900

7975

Fixed

7900

7975

Fixed

8025

8400

Fixed

8025

8400

Fixed

8500

8750

Fixed

8500

8750

Fixed

8850

9000

Fixed

8850

9000

Fixed

9500

10125

Fixed

9500

10125

Fixed

10125

10225

Fixed

10125

10225

Fixed

10225

10475

Fixed

10225

10475

Fixed

10475

10500

Fixed

10475

10500

Fixed

13400

14000

Fixed

13400

14000

Fixed

14620

15230

Fixed

14620

15230

Fixed

Pricing for 2006-07 is yet to be concluded with Ofcom but it is expected that the priced bands and the basis (either fixed or mobile) for pricing will remain as in 2005-06.

The bands used by the MOD that are not subject to pricing other than the above are those available for military use that are listed in the United Kingdom Frequency Allocation Table (2004 Issue No. 13) that is issued by the National Frequency Planning Group on behalf of the Cabinet Official Committee on UK Spectrum Management.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what spectrum price was paid by his Department for the bands which it managed in each financial year from 2004-05; and what estimate he has made for each financial year from 2006-07 to 2009-10. (83354)

The payments made to Ofcom for spectrum in each of the last two financial years were:

£ million

2004-05

24

2005-06

55

The change in cost was as a result of agreements reached following a review of spectrum pricing policy and procedures.

A sum of £56 million has been allocated for spectrum expenditure in financial year 2006-07 but funding for subsequent years is still under discussion.

Type 23 Frigates (Sonar 2087)

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what future roles are planned for the five Type 23 frigates which are not to be fitted with Sonar 2087; and what the scheduled out-of-service date is for each of these ships. (85382)

HM Ships Montrose, Monmouth, Iron Duke, Lancaster and Argyll are not scheduled to receive Sonar 2087. These ships will be employed across the normal range of standing strategic, home and overseas commitments. These include Fleet Ready Escort duties around home waters, operational deployments to the Gulf and Arabian Sea, and standing tasks in the South Atlantic (APT(S)), Caribbean (APT(N)) and within NATO's Standing Maritime Group in the Mediterranean (SNMG2). They will also continue to contribute to the UK's Maritime Joint Rapid Reaction Force (JRRF) held at high readiness for contingent operations, and deploy on pre-planned activities as JRRF elements within a Task Group.

On current plans the ships will be withdrawn from service in:

Date

HMS Argyll

2019

HMS Lancaster

2019

HMS Iron Duke

2020

HMS Monmouth

2021

HMS Montrose

2021

Veterans

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on ensuring that employers are informed of the skills that veterans bring to the workplace. (84822)

We have seen no need so far for specific discussions between my right hon. Friends the Secretaries of State for Defence and for Work and Pensions on ensuring that employers are informed of the skills of Service leavers. High rates of employment for Service leavers are already achieved through the Department’s Career Transition Partnership (CTP) as part of the resettlement process. Of those who wish to work and are eligible for the service, over 50 per cent. are in employment within one month of discharge, rising to about 95 per cent. six months post-discharge.

The CTP commercial partner, Right Management Ltd. is a highly experienced outplacement company with a proven track record. It has a very effective marketing arm that carefully targets prospective employers who can offer quality jobs to Service leavers. Those employers who engage Service leavers are seldom disappointed and tend to seek more when vacancies arise.

The cultivation of prospective employers is a continuing process, not only for Right Management but for all others involved in the resettlement of departing Service personnel. It is an area of further development under the new CTP contract, with particular emphasis on tying together, at both local and national level, jobs and resettlement training opportunities and exploiting those who have passed successfully through the CTP process to attain posts of influence in civilian employment.

For the minority of early Service leavers who are not eligible for CTP services, a resettlement briefing is provided which signposts employment help available from Other Government Departments and ex-Service charities: contacts are arranged on their behalf as necessary, and these are followed up by the briefing officer. This group of early leavers is also assessed for vulnerability to social exclusion and extra help is given where this is identified as a concern. The effectiveness of these arrangements is being kept under review.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what recent discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Health on meeting the health needs of veterans through the NHS. (84823)

There have been no recent discussions on the subject between Secretaries of State. Since 1948, it has been the policy of successive Governments that health care for veterans should be provided by the NHS. Priority NHS treatment applies to veterans who are war pensioners for their accepted disorders. Officials in the Ministry of Defence and the four UK Health Departments work closely together, and they are at present developing delivery models to ensure high quality mental health services for veterans across the UK. My predecessors and I have been closely briefed on this and other work in the area of veterans' health. Should there be any issues following this work, or otherwise, I will discuss these with Ministers from the Department of Health and devolved Administrations through the Veterans Ministerial Task Force, as appropriate.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assistance is given to service personnel leaving the armed forces on finding appropriate housing; and what guidance has been given to housing authorities on assisting service personnel. (84824)

Assistance is given through such schemes as Long Service Advance of Pay and advice offered by the Joint Services Housing Advice Office. Guidance is available to local authorities generally about the allocation of accommodation, the provision of homelessness assistance and the prevention of rough sleeping. This includes guidance on the circumstances when people leaving the armed forces would have a priority need for accommodation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what research his Department is undertaking into (a) homelessness among veterans and (b) veterans in prison; and if he will make a statement. (84827)

The Ex-Service Action Group, of which the Ministry of Defence and the Department for Communities and Local Government are members, has commissioned research to look into the effectiveness of interventions in preventing rough sleeping and homelessness among ex-Service personnel in London. The MOD will meet about 70 per cent. of the cost of this research from the Veterans Challenge Fund. The Department is not currently undertaking any research into veterans in prison but is leading a project with the Home Office, ex-Service charities and other voluntary sector organisations to assist ex-Service offenders in custody and on release, and their families, to reduce the risk of re-offending. In a related area, the Department has funded research on the possible merits of mentoring for vulnerable veterans which looked in particular at the needs of personnel discharged from the Military Corrective Training Centre. We are currently considering how best to take forward the results of this work.

Weapons Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much has been spent on the development of the 40 mm Case Telescoped Ammunition weapon; and what assessment has been made of its (a) effectiveness and (b) in service cost. (85307)

The 40 mm Cased Telescope Ammunition weapon has been developed using private venture capital by CTA International. The Ministry of Defence is conducting a Technology Demonstrator Programme to assess its effectiveness when vehicle-mounted. No study has yet been made of the through-life costs of the system.

Work and Pensions

Advertising Campaigns

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what advertising campaigns his Department has run since July 2004; and what the (a) date and (b) cost was of each. (81913)

The Department runs a number of promotional campaigns aimed at increasing awareness of rights and responsibilities. The dates and costs are given as follows:

£000

Financial year

(a) Date of activity

(b) Annual cost

Age Partnership Group

2005-06

April 2005 to March 2006

19

2006-07

April 2006 to May 2006

8

Age Positive

2004-05

April 2004 to March 2005

29

2005-06

April 2005 to March 2006

68

Council Tax Benefit

2004-05

January 2005

674

March 2005

2005-06

January 2005 to February 2005

526

March 2005

Direct Payment

2004-05

April 2004

8,379

June 2004 to December 2004

January 2005 -March 2005

Disability Discrimination Act

2004-05

March 2004 to September 2004

1,992

January 2005 to March 2005

2005-06

December 2005 to May 2006

888

IB Reforms Pilot

2004-05

April 2004 to May 2004

106

Images of Disability

2005-06

September 2005

2

Lone Parent Leaflet Promotion Marketing

2004-05

March 2005

216

National Sector Campaign

2005-06

July 2005 to September 2005

23

October 2005 to December 2005

January 2006 to March 2006

National Vacancy Campaign

2004-05

October 2004 to March 2005

390

Pension Credit

2004-05

April 2004 to July 2004

4,388

2005-06

January 2005 to March 2005

362

State Pension Deferral

2004-05

November 2004 to July 2005

115

2005-06

January 2006 to March 2006

392

2006-07

April 2006 to May 2006

51

State Second Pension

2005-06

January 2006 to February 2006

675

Targeting Benefit Fraud

2004-05

June 2004 to July 2004

6,017

October 2004 to November 2004

December 2004 to February 2005

2005-06

June 2005 to July 2005

7,042

October 2005 to November 2005

February 2005 to March 2005

Winter Fuel Payments

2004-05

June 2004 to March 2005

515

2005-06

June 2005 to March 2006

918

Notes:1. The table does not include the following as the information is not held centrally and to obtain it would incur disproportionate cost: spend by non-departmental bodies for which the Department is responsible details of highly localised publicity activity by the Department’s customer-facing businesses recruitment or procurement advertising. 2. The figures refer to media spend only, excluding production and other costs. 3. All figures have been rounded to the nearest 1,000. 4. All figures are exclusive of VAT.

Benefit Take-up

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of (a) the number of people who were entitled to but not claiming (i) unemployment benefit and (ii) incapacity benefit in (A) rural and (B) non-rural areas in each year since 1997 and (b) what proportion each figure represents of all those entitled to each benefit. (85921)

Estimates are not available below national level for income-based jobseeker’s allowance. The national estimates are available in the DWP report entitled “Income Related Benefits Estimates of Take-Up”. Copies of the latest publication, which describes patterns in take-up since 1997-98, together with past reports, are available in the Library.

No estimates are available for incapacity benefit.

Computer Software

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what his Department's policy is on the treatment of depreciation of computer software; and whether any extraordinary charges in respect of computer software assets have been made in the last three years. (82526)

The Department has a policy to depreciate software using a straight-line method, at rates calculated to write off the current replacement cost, less estimated residual value, of each asset in equal instalments over its expected useful life.

Assets are depreciated from the month following acquisition or from when the asset is brought into use, if later.

Software purchases are depreciated over a period of five years. Software licences and software development costs are depreciated over a period of five years or the life of the asset or licence period, if shorter.

No extraordinary charges have been made in the last three years in respect of software.

Crisis Loans

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much was spent on crisis loans for people in (a) Stroud and (b) Gloucestershire in each of the last five years. (84153)

The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is in the table.

Crisis loans for area covered by Gloucestershire Jobcentre Plus district

Expenditure (£)

2001-02

229,000

2002-03

322,000

2003-04

332,000

2004-05

273,000

2005-06

279,000

Notes: 1. Data is not available by parliamentary constituency or county, but only by Jobcentre Plus district.

2. From April 2002, Stroud parliamentary constituency and the county of Gloucestershire were in Gloucestershire Jobcentre Plus district, previously known as Gloucestershire Social Fund district. This district merged with another district in April 2005. The figure for 2005-06 in the table is for the area covered by the former Gloucestershire Jobcentre Plus district. 3. Figures have been rounded to the nearest 1,000. Source: DWP Social Fund Policy, Budget and Management Information System.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much was spent on crisis loans for people in Coventry, South in each of the last five years. (84848)

The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is in the table.

Crisis loans for area covered by Coventry and Warwickshire Jobcentre Plus districtExpenditure (£)2001-02762,0002002-03765,0002003-04907,0002004-05915,0002005-061,100,000 Notes: 1. Data is not available by parliamentary constituency but only by Jobcentre Plus district. 2. The parliamentary constituency of Coventry South is in the Jobcentre Plus district of Coventry and Warwickshire. This district was formed in September 2002 by merging the Social Fund district of Coventry and the Social Fund district of Warwickshire. The expenditure for these two districts has been combined in the table. 3. Figures have been rounded to the nearest 1,000. Source: DWP Social Fund Policy, Budget and Management Information System.

Departmental Staff (Sickness Absence)

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 14 June 2006, Official Report, column 1296W, on departmental staff, how many staff in his Department have had more than two periods of sickness of less than five days in two or more of the years for which he has provided figures. (84045)

Full information on how many staff in the DWP have had more than two periods of sickness of less than five days or more in two or more years is not collated and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Disability Living Allowance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many households in Oxfordshire include a person with a learning disability who receives the care component of disability living allowance at the (a) highest rate, (b) middle rate and (c) lowest rate. (82202)

The administration of disability living allowance is a matter for the chief executive of the Disability and Carers Service, Mr. Terry Moran. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Terry Moran, dated 17 July 2006:

You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many households in Oxfordshire include a person with a learning disability who receives the care component of disability living allowance at the (a) highest rate (b) middle rate and (c) lowest rate.

The Minister for Disabled People, Anne McGuire MP, promised you a substantive reply from the chief Executive of the Disability and Carers Service.

The information available is in the following tables:

Recipients of disability living allowance with learning difficulties by rate of care award as at November 2005 in Oxfordshire parliamentary constituencies

Care component

Total with care component

Highest rate

Middle rate

Lowest rate

County of Oxford total

1,940

540

340

1,070

Banbury

370

90

70

220

Henley

200

60

30

110

Oxford East

430

120

70

240

Oxford West and Abingdon

290

70

50

170

Wantage

320

100

60

170

Witney

330

100

60

160

Notes:

1. Numbers are rounded to the nearest 10.

2. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

3. Parliamentary constituencies are assigned by matching postcodes against the relevant postcode directory.

4. Figures are based on the care component condition only.

Source:

DWP, WPLS 100 per cent. data.

Recipients of Disability Living Allowance with learning difficulties by rate of care award as at November 2005 in Oxfordshire local authorities

Care component

Total with care component

Highest rate

Middle rate

Lowest rate

Oxfordshire total

1,940

530

340

1,070

Cherwell

440

110

70

250

Oxford

480

120

80

280

South Oxfordshire

330

100

60

160

Vale of White Horse

370

90

70

220

West Oxfordshire

320

100

60

160

Notes:

1. Numbers are rounded to the nearest 10.

2. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

3. Local authorities are assigned by matching postcodes against the relevant postcode

directory.

4. Figures are based on the care component condition only.

Source:

DWP, WPLS 100 per cent. data.

I hope this is helpful.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many households in Somerset include a person with a learning disability who receives the care component of disability living allowance at the (a) highest, (b) middle and (c) lowest rate. (82282)

The administration of disability living allowance is a matter for the Chief Executive of the Disability and Carers Service, Mr. Terry Moran. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Terry Moran, dated 17 July 2006:

You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many households in Somerset include a person with a learning disability who receives the care component of disability living allowance at the (a) highest (b) middle and (c) lowest rate.

The Minister for Disabled People, Anne McGuire MP, promised you a substantive reply from the Chief Executive of the Disability and Carers Service.

The information available is in the following table:

Recipients of disability living allowance with learning difficulties by rate of care award as at November 2005 in Somerset local authorities.Care ComponentTotal with care componentHigher rateMiddle rateLowest rateSomerset total2,0105204301,060Mendip430100110220 Sedgemoor43011090230South Somerset560160120280Taunton Deane44013090220West Somerset1603030110Notes: 1. Numbers are rounded to the nearest 10. 2. Totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Local authorities are assigned by matching postcodes against the relevant postcode directory. 4. Figures are based on the care component condition only. 5. Information is only available for the Somerset local authorities. Source: DWP, WPLS 100 per cent. data.

I hope this is helpful.

Financial Assistance Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) what additional resources his Department estimates would be needed to extend the provision of the financial assistance scheme to those aged (a) between 59 and 62, (b) between 55 and 59 and (c) under 55; and if he will make a statement; (69545)

(2) what estimate he has made of the additional resources needed to extend the provision of the financial assistance scheme to those who otherwise fulfil the eligibility criteria but who are aged (a) below 55 and (b) between 55 and 59; and if he will make a statement.

Eligibility for the financial assistance scheme is based on the number of years to normal scheme retirement age when the financial assistance scheme was introduced in May 2004. People within three years of their normal scheme retirement age qualify for payments when they reach 65. Not all schemes have a retirement age of 65. Estimates of the cost of extending the financial assistance scheme to individuals of specific ages are not available.

Health and Safety

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many Health and Safety Executive inspectors have been employed in the field operations division in each of the last five years, broken down by region. (81115)

The number of Health and Safety inspectors employed in the Field Operations Directorate for each of the last five years broken down by region are listed in the following table.

On 1 April 2005, management responsibility for 72 inspectors transferred from field operations directorate to policy group but their role remains essentially unchanged.

As at 1 April each year

Scotland

North West

Yorkshire and North East

Midlands

Wales South West

East South East

London

Total

2002

120

119

129

163

105

183

83

902

2003

110

98

108

155

144

195

86

896

2004

103

96

133

141

112

164

77

826

2005

87

86

111

133

107

168

73

765

2006

89

91

113

121

112

159

70

755

From October 2004, we have also had a front-line force of health and safety awareness officers, numbering 97 in 2006. The proportion of front-line staff remains at 21 per cent. of HSE staff in 2006 as it was in 2005, so essentially front-line delivery remains the same.

Over the last four years, the FOD has consistently increased the proportion of time it spends on front-line activities—standing at 61 per cent. for the 2005-06 work year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what (a) work on contract for overseas Governments and public bodies, (b) work on contract for overseas commercial interests and (c) collaborative work with other agencies abroad is carried out by (i) the Health and Safety Executive and (ii) the Health and Safety Laboratory; and if he will make a statement. (81940)

The Health and Safety Executive carries out no work under contract for overseas Governments, public bodies and commercial interests. It does, however, carry out a considerable amount of collaborative work with other agencies abroad. The principal items of such work and the agencies, etc., with whom they are done are listed in table A.

The work currently being carried out by Health and Safety Laboratory (HSL) on contract for overseas Governments and public bodies and for overseas commercial interests is set out in tables B1, B2 and B3.

In addition, HSL operates the Great Britain Explosives Notified Body, which offers a service to industry throughout the world to certify explosives falling within the scope of the European Directive 93/15/EEC and the Placing on the Market and Supervision of Transfers of Explosives Regulations (POMSTER). Explosives that meet the requirements of the directive and POMSTER may be marked with the CE mark. HSL currently has 80 overseas commercial applicants for certification.

HSL collaborates with a large number of overseas laboratories, principally in the area of quality control. In addition, HSL has formal collaboration agreements in place with the following overseas organisations: Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency; Canadian Explosives Research Laboratory; Institut de Recherche Robert Sauve en Sante et en Securite du Traveil (IRSST) Canada; and the National Institute for Occupational Health of the National Health and Laboratory Service, South Africa. Together with 11 other laboratories in member states of the EU, HSL is a signatory to the Framework Agreement on the Foundation of the Partnership for European Research in Occupational Safety and Health (PEROSH); and is also a World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre.

In addition to these formal collaborative arrangements, Both HSE and HSL staff also regularly exchange information with the counterparts, experts and scientists throughout the world, both in the public and private sectors.

Table A: Collaborative work carried out by HSE with Overseas Agencies

Organisation

Area of work

World Health Organisation

Health effects of exposure to static/time varying electro magnetic fields; occupational safety and health statistics.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency

Nuclear energy safety.

International Labour Organisation

Developing and maintaining occupational safety and health standards.

International Social Security Association: International Agriculture Section

Occupational safety and health in agriculture.

International Organisation for Standardization

International health and safety standards.

International Atomic Energy Agency

Nuclear energy safety.

United Nations Group of Experts on the Globally Harmonised System for the Classification and Labelling of Chemicals

Classification and labelling of chemicals.

International Conference of Chief Inspectors of Explosives

Exchange of information and good practice on the regulation of explosives.

International Association of Labour Inspectorates

Exchange of information and good practice on occupational safety and health enforcement.

International Regulators' Offshore Safety Forum

Offshore occupational safety and health.

International Group of Experts on the Explosion Risk of Unstable Substances

Energetic and oxidising substances and explosives, propellants and pyrotechnics.

International Collaborative Group on Environmentally Assisted Cracking

Nuclear energy safety.

European Agency for Safety and Health at Work

European Week of Safety and Health at Work, occupational safety and health statistics.

European Union Administration and Cooperation Groups

Occupational safety and health in machinery, pressure, lifts and equipment for use in explosive atmospheres.

European Commission: Eurostat

Occupational safety and health statistics.

European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions

Occupational safety and health statistics.

European Committee for Standardization (CEN)

Occupational health and safety standards.

European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education and Health and Safety

Collaboration to develop methodology to obtain user information for the design of tools.

European Senior Labour Inspectorate Committee

Exchange of information and good practice on occupational safety and health enforcement.

European Working Group on Reactor Dosimetry

Nuclear energy safety.

European Chemicals Bureau and competent authorities in all EU Member States

Classification, labelling and safe use of chemicals.

North Sea Offshore Authorities Forum

Offshore occupational safety and health.

French Government-Ministere des Affaires Sociales (Ministry for Social Affairs)

Developing joint policy on machinery safety issues.

German Government- Ministerium fur Umwelt und Verkehr (Ministry for Environment and Transport)

Machinery safety issues.

Dutch Government-Arbeidsinspectie Expertisecentrum

Developing procedure to deal with the application of EU Supply Directives.

Dutch State Supervision of Mines

Offshore occupational safety and health.

Danish Energy Authority Ministry of Economic and Business Affairs

Offshore occupational safety and health.

Petroleum Safety Authority Norway

Offshore occupational safety and health.

US Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Occupational safety and health in ground handling activities in air transport.

Atlantic Alliance (UK, USA, Germany, Ireland, Australia)

Occupational safety and health in quarries.

Table B1: Work carried out by HSL on contract for overseas governments and publicbodies

Organisation

Area of work

European Commission

Creation and the promotion of an inclusive risk governance culture.

European Commission

Quantification and control of the hazards associated with the transport and bulk storage of fireworks.

European Commission

Handbook for approval of hydrogen refuelling stations.

European Commission

Sharing experience on risk management to design future industrial systems.

European Commission

Safety of hydrogen as an energy carrier.

European Commission

Safe production and use of nanomaterials.

Health and Safety Inspectorate, Gibraltar

Dock work safety.

Health and Safety Authority, Ireland

Exchange of information, advice and support on process safety issues.

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health

Occupational health and safety research topic centre.

Institut National de I'Environment Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), France

Hydrogen safety course.

Institut Quimic de Sarria, Spain

Explosives and explosives prevention.

National Institute of Occupational Hygiene, South Africa

Assessment of measurement and analysis of chemicals.

County Wexford Garda, Ireland

Diving equipment examination.

University of Wuerzburg, Germany

Risk assessment

TNO Quality of Life, The Netherlands

Development of worked examples for exposure scenarios of biocidal products to humans.

CRP Centro para la Prevencion de Riesgos Professionales, Columbia

Urine sample analysis.

Table B2: Work carried out by HSL on contract for overseas commercial interests

Organisation

Area of work

European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC), Belgium

Analysis of chemicals.

The Oil Companies European Organisation for Environment, Health and Safety (CONCAWE), Belgium

Analytical support for gasoline risk assessment.

Hilti Aktiengesellschaft, Leichtenstein

Tests on two fastening tools to assist the client in self-certification.

Adisseo France SAS, France

Measurement of dustiness of one powder.

Saint Gobain Cree, France

Measurement of dustiness of three carbon powders.

Microclean Environmental Ltd, Ireland

Analysis of chemical samples.

EHS Risk Management Services, Ireland

Nitrous oxide sampling.

AB Achema, Lithuania

Testing resistance to detonation.

Borax Rotterdam NV, The Netherlands

Testing chemicals in air filter samples.

Table B3: Work carried out by HSL on contract for a consortium of overseas public bodies and commercial interests

Organisation

Area of work

Danish Gas Technology Centre, Denmark; Gastec Technology BV, The Netherlands; Directorate for Civil Protection and Emergency Planning, Norway

Group sponsored research project on area classification for secondary releases from low-pressure natural gas systems in naturally and mechanically ventilated indoor locations.

Housing Benefit

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what average level of housing benefit was paid to claimants in (a) local authority, (b) housing association and (c) private rented accommodation in each London borough in (i) the latest month for which information is available and (ii) the same month in 2005-06. (85006)

The most recent available information is for November 2005. Information for November 2004 has been provided for comparison. The information is in the table.

Average amounts of housing benefit in payment by tenure in London boroughs: November 2004 and 2005

London borough

November 2004

November 2005

LA

RSL

Private

LA

RSL

Private

Barking

61.46

70.27

117.92

65.32

74.97

124.07

Barnet

75.61

125.66

143.45

78.07

125.15

148.85

Bexley

253.40

69.47

112.63

303.64

71.98

116.12

Brent

88.11

113.09

135.05

91.61

117.11

139.48

Bromley

1

75.36

121.71

1

78.33

127.93

Camden

80.68

96.81

135.21

84.12

101.08

141.62

City of London

75.53

85.77

110.38

76.44

89.77

111.83

Croydon

69.09

90.35

127.80

71.58

91.80

133.00

Ealing

92.41

98.10

130.38

99.98

99.26

137.08

Enfield

98.23

106.05

128.97

103.04

108.71

137.66

Greenwich

60.94

76.02

112.39

63.19

78.93

119.36

Hackney

76.67

86.32

128.13

78.59

90.91

137.90

Hammersmith and Fulham

78.40

87.04

120.70

85.42

94.85

141.35

Haringey

105.11

107.77

116.30

114.35

111.44

121.95

Harrow

71.75

139.92

138.63

72.12

142.06

143.18

Havering

52.33

73.71

113.11

58.64

75.67

117.82

Hillingdon

97.76

80.94

121.59

105.93

80.89

128.95

Hounslow

72.63

80.71

122.84

77.47

82.33

128.36

Islington

75.14

83.13

118.71

77.55

89.17

126.52

Kensington and Chelsea

101.99

84.59

165.65

113.43

89.19

170.65

Kingston upon Thames

89.74

82.26

127.91

94.23

86.42

132.34

Lambeth

81.02

73.48

110.43

86.58

77.75

115.03

Lewisham

59.12

80.29

88.31

63.52

85.00

137.71

Merton

60.85

80.87

125.17

65.18

84.05

132.83

Newham

100.09

120.11

116.30

120.81

120.60

123.35

Redbridge

130.24

92.45

123.13

141.16

94.38

131.01

Richmond upon Thames

251.81

69.50

130.61

245.84

72.82

138.23

Southwark

65.45

78.87

118.05

67.95

81.51

119.76

Sutton

60.29

78.44

120.86

63.31

82.80

126.01

Tower Hamlets

89.13

79.20

120.60

92.91

82.18

140.05

Waltham Forest

89.11

76.67

105.61

96.46

79.13

114.55

Wandsworth

77.78

100.29

130.60

83.01

101.83

175.69

Westminster

119.12

115.58

171.96

144.40

109.52

179.86

1 Data is nil or non applicable. This includes cases where the average amounts have been suppressed if the corresponding caseloads are nil or negligible.

Notes:

1. Average amounts have been rounded to the nearest penny.

2. “LA” = local authority, “RSL” = registered social landlord.

3. LA figures include non-HRA rent rebates.

Source:

Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit Management Information System Quarterly 100 per cent. caseload stock-count taken in November 2004 and November 2005.

Information Technology

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the (a) originally estimated, (b) most recently estimated and (c) out-turn cost was in each of the five largest information technology contracts agreed with outside suppliers over the last five years. (71817)

Information that is available is in the following table.

Contract

Supplier

Original contract estimate (£ million)

Most recently estimated (£ million)

Accord / Standard Services Business Allocation (SSBA)

EDS

3,433.5

2,396.8

Accord / Integrated Communications and Network Services (ICONS)

BT

1,411.3

870.0

Pensions Transformation Project

Accenture

129.0

122.0

Benefits Processing Replacement Programme / Working Age Transformation and Change Programme

IBM

123.4

79.7

Central Payment System

Siemens

59.6

59.6

Medical Assessments

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what proportion of medical assessments for benefit entitlement have been appealed in each of the last five years; and what proportion of appeals for each benefit has been successful. (76883)

I have been asked to reply.

I refer the hon. Member to the response I gave to his question of 27 June 2006, Official Report, column 286W, as the information asked for is not available in the format requested. Data are collected by benefit type rather than by whether a medical assessment is carried out.

New Deal for Disabled People

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) if he will take steps to make the New Deal for Disabled People open to those who are in receipt of jobseeker's allowance who are partially sighted; and if he will make a statement; (83326)

(2) what equipment is available for those on New Deal for Disabled People.

New Deal for Disabled People (NDDP) services are available to people with a health condition or disability, including those who are partially sighted, who are in receipt of a range of benefits. Eligible benefits include incapacity benefit and income support with a disability premium, but not jobseeker's allowance (JSA). We have no plans to change the eligibility criteria for the programme.

There is no specific funding for equipment for NDDP customers and it is not a requirement of the programme to provide equipment. However, NDDP job brokers have the flexibility to use their funds to provide equipment, if they feel it is appropriate to do so. Equipment can also be accessed through other provision, for example, the adviser discretion fund (ADF), which enables the purchase of almost anything, up to a limit of £100 within a 12-month period, that will help a customer obtain a job or take up an offer of employment. NDDP customers can access ADF through Jobcentre Plus advisers.

Access to Work also helps disabled people enter and stay in employment by providing a range of practical help to them and their employers, including the provision of equipment to help overcome barriers faced at work as a result of disability.

Office Equipment

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many (a) personal computers, (b) laptops, (c) servers, (d) printers, (e) scanners, (f) photocopiers and (g) fax machines (i) his Department and (ii) each (A) non-departmental public body, (B) Executive agency and (C) other public body for which his Department is responsible in (1) Scotland, (2) Wales, (3) each English region and (4) Northern Ireland owned in (x) 2003-04 and (y) 2004-05. (40089)

DWP central asset registers do not hold the requested data in national and regional splits. Assets owned by DWP are held against individual business units and by financial cost centre. The information is therefore provided below by year and by business unit.

In addition to the assets owned by DWP, the Department also utilises equipment owned by our major IT service provider EDS, under PFI arrangements. The figures for these supplier-owned assets are included separately.

There were approximately 130,000 staff in DWP in March 2005 and significantly more PCs than people. There are several reasons for this, including PCs allocated to;

Part-time staff on an individual basis

Staff who work from more than one site or from home

Business testing and training (e.g. for our large modernisation programme)

The time lag between staff reductions and equipment removals.

The figure continues to fall. We estimate that the current figure is 147,794 PCs and 8,169 laptops. The contractual and budgetary provisions of the recently aligned contract with EDS are designed to drive the numbers down further and to provide significantly improved asset management services.

The returns for non-departmental bodies for which DWP is responsible have been obtained from each individual body.

Photocopiers can be purchased or leased by local management and central figures are not available, however, a central DWP leasing arrangement for mid-range copiers indicates that 5,123 copiers were leased as at March 2005.

The information is contained within the following tables:

March 2004

PCs

Laptops

Servers

Printers

Scanners

Copiers

Fax

Appeals Agency (inc Tribunal non-Departmental Public Bodies)

1,384

238

55

686

10

7

90

Jobcentre Plus

69,742

2,618

951

14,498

195

408

27

Child Support Agency

13,408

1,080

135

1,525

14

43

27

Corporate Centre

34,803

4,362

3,981

6,932

179

53

0

Disability and Carers

60

7

1

11

0

0

0

Pensions

19,457

2,562

134

2,894

58

13

8

Health and Safety Executive, Health and Safety Commission, Health and Safety Laboratory

904

207

50

292

65

164

45

Rent Service

Part of Office of Deputy Prime Minister so no data available for this year

Disability Rights Commission

294

71

33

38

9

7

9

Independent Living Funds

190

19

11

53

0

4

8

Pensions Protection Fund

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Health and Safety Commission1

Pensions Regulator

280

55

43

40

6

5

10

Remploy Limited

800

900

123

1,600

200

100

250

Disability Employment Advisory Committee2

Disability Living Allowance Advisory Board

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Industrial Injuries Advisory Council

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

National Employment Panel

39

10

0

13

1

0

1

Social Security Advisory Committee

5

1

0

2

0

0

1

Office Pensions Ombudsman

43

2

1

14

1

2

1

Motability

150

9

11

15

2

6

3

Independent Review Service and Social

189

3

5

51

3

5

12

Fund Commissioner

Pensions Advisory Service

44

4

3

16

1

3

2

EDS owned equipment

48,237

4,002

1,900

13,265

117

0

0

Total

190,034

16,150

7,437

41,945

861

820

494

1 Included in House 2 Included in Corporate Centre Note: Disability Living Allowance Advisory Board has no equipment.

March 2005

PCs

Laptops

Servers

Printers

Scanners

Copiers

Fax

Appeals Agency (inc Tribunal non Departmental Public Bodies)

1,358

233

47

706

7

4

81

Jobcentre Plus

65,310

1,552

1,084

11,336

116

404

27

Child Support Agency

12,830

835

151

1,350

14

43

27

Corporate Centre

20,702

3,657

3,699

3,579

131

35

10

Disability and Carers

8,020

263

161

1,739

14

4

0

Pensions

18,915

2,874

148

2,802

61

13

1

Health and Safety Executive, Health and Safety Commission, Health and Safety Laboratory

981

270

56

131

22

132

27

Rent Service

908

235

161

333

25

39

90

Disability Rights Commission

314

82

43

51

14

7

9

Independent Living Funds

250

33

17

54

0

4

9

Pensions Protection Fund

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Health and Safety Commission1

Pensions Regulator

400

60

65

42

6

5

12

Remploy Limited

800

900

123

1,600

200

120

300

Disability Employment Advisory Committee2

Disability Living Allowance Advisory Board

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Industrial InjuriesAdvisory Council

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

National Employment Panel

39

10

0

13

1

0

1

Social Security Advisory Committee

6

2

0

2

0

0

1

Office Pensions Ombudsman

43

2

1

14

1

2

1

Motability

120

15

11

15

4

6

3

Independent Review Service and Social Fund Commissioner

211

5

6

51

3

5

12

Pensions Advisory Service

44

4

3

16

1

3

2

EDS owned equipment

44,975

4,553

1,900

12,757

121

0

0

Total

176,231

15,585

7,659

36,591

741

826

613

1 Included in House 2 Included in Corporate Centre Note: Disability Living Allowance Advisory Board has no equipment.

Official Visits

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on how many occasions he has visited each region in an official capacity in the last 12 months. (83907)

In the last 12 months the Secretary of State has made the following number of official visits to each region:

Number

East

1

East Midlands

5

London

3

North East

1

North West

2

Northern Ireland

1

Scotland

2

South West

1

West Midlands

1

Yorkshire and Humber

1

All visits were conducted in accordance with the ministerial code. The official visits figures do not include speeches in London or departmental visits without an external dimension.

Outsourcing

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what administrative functions for which his Department is responsible are outsourced overseas; and what assessment he has made of the merits of outsourcing further such functions overseas. (81550)

None of the administrative functions for which the Department for Work and Pensions is responsible are outsourced overseas.

Currently the Department has no intention to locate administration functions overseas, therefore no assessment has been made of the merits.

Pension Credit

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what his estimate is of the (a) number and (b) proportion of pensioners receiving pension credit in (i) 2020, (ii) 2030, (iii) 2040 and (iv) 2050 on the basis of the proposals made by the Pensions Commission; and if he will make a statement. (70294)

The Pensions Commission made no projections of receipt of pension credit in its second report “A New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-First Century”, giving figures for eligibility instead. These are shown in figure 6.42 on page 294.

Public Appointments

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many public appointments are within his patronage; what (a) salary and (b) other emoluments are attached to each; and what the comparable figures were in (i) 1976, (ii) 1986 and (iii) 1996. (83167)

Details of the public appointments to public bodies sponsored by The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) can be found in “Public Bodies”, copies of which are in the Library. “Public Bodies” has been published annually since 1980 and the most recent edition provides figures for 2005. Each edition of “Public Bodies” contains details on the number of public appointments and remuneration details for that particular year. DWP was established in June 2001 and stewardship of those of its public bodies in existence before this time sat within its predecessor Departments. Comparable information for 1976, 1986 and 1996 in respect of DWP public bodies could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Details of the latest remuneration for each of the 130 public appointments to the bodies sponsored by DWP are set out in the following table:

Non-departmental public body (NDPB)/Year established

Public appointments

Remuneration

Disability Employment Advisory Committee (DEAC) 2002

Chair

Unpaid1

14 Members

Unpaid1

Disability Living Allowance Advisory Board (DLAAB) 1991

Chair

£286.00 per day

7 Medical Members

£243.00 per day

£121. 50 per half day

10 Non-Medical Members

£134.00 per day

£67.00 per half day

Disability Rights Commission (DRC) 2000

Chair

£117,000 per annum

14 Members

£150.00 per day

Health and Safety Commission (HSC) 1974

Chair

£126,594 per annum

9 Members

£15,435.00 per annum

Independent Living Funds (ILF) 1993

Chair

Unpaid

6 Members

Unpaid

Industrial Injuries Advisory Council IIAC) 1948

Chair

£260.00 per full council meeting and

£141 per council sub-group meeting

15 Members

£141.00 per meeting

National Employment Panel (NEP) 2001

Chair

Unpaid

23 Members

Unpaid

Pensions Ombudsman (PO) 1991 Pension Protection Fund Ombudsman (PPFO) 2005

Ombudsman

£122,186.00 per annum

Deputy Ombudsman

£83,946.00 per annum

Pensions Protection Fund (PPF) 2005

Chair

£82, 934. 80 per annum

5 Members

£15,171.00 per annum

Remploy Ltd. 1945

Chair

£38,634 per annum

6 Non-Executive Directors

£7,500.00 per annum

Social Security Advisory Committee (SSAC) 1980

Chair

£21,000 per annum

13 Members

£210.00 per day

The Pensions Regular (TPR) 2005

Chair

£103,668.50 per annum

5 Members

£10,114.00 per annum

1 Loss of earnings up to a maximum daily rate of £138 may be claimed.

Redundancies

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much (a) his Department and (b) the agencies for which he has responsibility spent on redundancy payments in each of the last four years. (82564)

The amount spent by the Department on all staff early release schemes in each of the last four years is in the following table.

£ million

Business Area

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

Total

The Pension Service

0.2

0.19

1.29

14.1

15.7

Child Support Agency

0.83

0.82

0.84

4.5

7.0

Disability and Carers Service

n/a

n/a

0

7.0

7.0

The Appeals Service

0.15

0.17

0.2

0.2

0.7

Jobcentre Plus

0

0.18

0.55

69.0

69.7

Health and Safety Executive

2.08

0.65

0.75

0.0

3.5

The Rent Service

n/a

n/a

1.7

0.0

1.7

Departmental Corporate Units

16.17

14.11

9.58

43.5

83.3

Total

19.43

16.12

14.91

138.3

188.6

n/a = Denotes that the Agency did not exist in the Department in the year in question.

Notes:

1. A proportion of the ongoing annual pension payments for early retirement cases are held centrally and included in the Departmental Corporate Units' line from 2004-05 and 2005-06.

2. The figures do not include the provisions made in the accounts for costs associated with staff approved for early release in 2006-07.

Remploy

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions when he will answer Question 77480, on the review of Remploy, tabled by the hon. Member for Mid Dorset and North Poole on 9 June. (80325)

[holding answer 26 June 2006]: I refer the hon. Member to the written answer I gave on 26 June 2006, Official Report, column 64W.

Sulphuric Acid

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions whether the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Levels has made progress in determining whether sulphuric acid should be classified as a carcinogen; and if he will make a statement on current occupational exposure limits to sulphuric acid mist. (84510)

The European Commission’s Scientific Committee for Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) does not make formal recommendations concerning the classification of chemicals. The responsibility for this falls to the Classification and Labelling Working Group established by the European Chemicals Bureau and this Group has not considered the classification of sulphuric acid as a carcinogen. However, in its deliberations leading to recommendations on occupational exposure limits, SCOEL undertakes an assessment of the evidence on all aspects of the substances under consideration, including whether or not a substance may have particular properties, including the potential to cause cancer in humans.

In relation to sulphuric acid mist, for which a Recommendation for an occupational exposure limit was published in October 2004, SCOEL felt that the balance of evidence from studies in worker populations was sufficient to indicate that sulphuric acid mist has the potential to cause laryngeal cancer in humans. However, there were insufficient data to reliably inform on the airborne exposure conditions that were associated with the increased incidence of laryngeal cancer in these studies. In relation to the mechanism whereby sulphuric acid mist causes laryngeal cancer, SCOEL concluded that it is based on long-term chronic irritation of the laryngeal epithelium, and that airborne exposures that are below the threshold for the induction of such irritant effects would not lead to any increased risk of cancer.

SCOEL recommended that an 8-hour time-weighted average occupational exposure limit, set at 0.05 mg.m-3, would not lead to any adverse health effects in workers, and would not be associated with any increased risk of cancer.

In November 2001 the Health and Safety Executive published a Chemical Hazard Alert Notice for sulphuric acid mist, which recommended that employers should control mist exposure to below 0.3 mg.m-3, in line with advice from the National Sulphuric Acid Association. The 8-hour time-weighted average occupational exposure standard (OES) for sulphuric acid, formerly set at 1 mg.m-3, was withdrawn by the Health and Safety Commission in May 2003. There is currently no British occupational exposure limit.

Tax Credits

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will place in the Library all documents regarding discussions held between his Department and HM Revenue and Customs on the use of National Insurance numbers in determining the eligibility for tax credits of an individual who has failed verification rule 12 of the Tax Credits Manual on Residency Criteria Not Met. (85792)

Ministers and officials have meetings with a wide range of organisations both within Government and outside as part of the process of policy development and delivery. As was the case with previous Administrations, it is not the practice to provide details of all such meetings.

Health

Animal-based Insulin

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what assessment she has made of Novo Nordisk’s discontinuation of pork insulin crystal production in Brazil; and what representations she has (a) made and (b) received on the matter; (84481)

(2) what recent assessment she has made of the supply of raw materials required to produce animal-based insulin; and if she will make a statement.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will take steps to ensure that the availability of animal insulin in the UK is not adversely affected by the discontinuation of animal insulin crystal production at Novo Nordisk’s Brazilian manufacturing facility which supplies raw materials to Wockhardt UK; and if she will make a statement. (85274)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether Wockhardt UK uses raw materials sourced from the Biobras pharmaceuticals facility in Brazil to manufacture their animal insulin products. (85977)

The Department has had no involvement with NovoNordisk’s production of insulin crystals, although I am aware that it acquired the Brazilian company, Biobras, a number of years ago. NovoNordisk has announced that it is discontinuing its animal derived insulins on a worldwide basis. However, animal insulins will remain available from Wockhardt UK, who has confirmed that future supplies of these products are independent of NovoNordisk.

Avian Influenza

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what account she took of the 50 per cent. fatality rate from H5N1 in determining the 2.5 per cent. fatality rate assumption for the relevant UK contingency plan. (85996)

Although the H5N1 virus has a reported fatality rate of around 50 per cent. in humans, there is some question regarding the accuracy of this figure. This is partly because we cannot guarantee that all H5N1 cases have been recorded. It is important to remember that fatality rates for pandemic flu have historically been lower than H5N1 avian flu. For example, the 1918 pandemic was the most severe in the 20th century and this had a fatality rate of around 2 per cent. This 2.5 per cent. figure was informed by international consensus and expert advice. Our modellers have taken the fatality rate of the H5N1 virus into consideration when agreeing this figure.

Community Hospitals

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate her Department has made of the number of community hospital beds in the Yorkshire Wolds and Coast Primary Care Trust area in each year since 1997. (85322)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate her Department has made of the number of community hospital beds likely to be needed in east Yorkshire over the next five years. (85323)

This information is not held by the Department. It is now for primary care trusts in partnership with strategic health authorities and other local stakeholders to plan, develop and improve services for local people.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health further to her oral statement of 5 July 2006, Official Report, column 826, on community hospitals, how many community hospitals have (a) opened and (b) closed in the Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire strategic health authority area since 1997; and how many are being considered for closure. (85999)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to her oral statement of 5 July 2006, Official Report, column 820, in which primary care trust areas the pilot community hospitals tariff to which she referred will be introduced next year. (85174)

[holding answer 13 July 2006]: We will set out shortly our plans for the national tariff in 2007-08, but we have never said there will be a community hospital tariff.

Crystal Blue Consulting

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the terms are of the contract her Department has with Crystal Blue Consulting in respect of a review of the impact of the market forces factor in the funding and operation of local health trusts; and what timetable has been set for (a) completion of the work and (b) publishing its findings. (81957)

The advisory committee on resource allocation (ACRA) is carrying out a review of the approach to calculating the staff market forces factor (MFF). To inform the review and following a competitive tendering exercise, the Department has let a contract with Crystal Blue Consulting to examine the feasibility of using national health service costs in calculating the staff MFF. It is expected that the work will be completed by autumn this year. The publication of the findings will be considered later.

Dentistry

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the outcome was of discussions between her Department, the North West London Strategic Health Authority and Hillingdon Primary Care Trust on the estimated £200,000 shortfall in the devolved dentistry budget for Hillingdon. (84372)

No formal discussions have been held between the Department, the then North West London strategic health authority and Hillingdon primary care trust (PCT) about the devolved dentistry budget for Hillingdon. However, I have been informed that Hillingdon PCT has now resolved this matter to its satisfaction.

Electrical Fields

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what research has been conducted (a) by and (b) for her Department into the health impacts from electrical fields from (i) mobile phones, (ii) other electronic equipment in the home or workplace and (iii) major external sources, including power cables, mobile phone masts and other transmitters; and what steps she (A) has taken and (B) plans to take to tackle the potential effects on health of electrical fields. (84059)

The Health Protection Agency’s radiation protection division (HPA-RPD) keeps the worldwide research findings on electric and magnetic fields (EMF) and health under review. In 2004 the HPA-RPD, previously the National Radiological Protection Board, undertook a comprehensive review of the existing body of research to date and formally recommended the adoption of EMF exposure guidelines published in 1998 by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The HPA advice is available on its website at www.hpa.org.uk/radiation/publications/documents_of_nrpb/pdfs/doc_15_2.pdf. The ICNIRP guidelines also form the basis of the 1999 European Recommendation (EC/519/1999) on limiting EMF public exposure.

English Partnerships

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 3 July 2006 to question 77864, Official Report, column 817W, how many of the 96 national health service sites acquired by English Partnerships on 6 April 2005 have been sold. (83220)

Of the 96 former hospital sites acquired by English Partnerships in April 2005, the following four sites have been sold so far:

Park Prewett, Basingstoke (part)

Linton Hospital, Maidstone

Renny Lodge, Newport Pagnell

Sheppey Hospital, Isle of Sheppey

Three of these sites—Renny Lodge, Linton Hospital and part of Park Prewett— will provide over 300 homes as part of the Design for Manufacture competition.

English Partnerships is working with partners to bring forward sites as quickly as possible and hopes to be able to announce preferred developers for a further four sites later this year.

Environmental Management

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether her Department (a) is committed to the achievement of environmental management to ISO14001 standard and (b) has been externally certified as in compliance with that standard; and if she will make a statement. (81185)

This Department is committed to maintaining the best possible standards of environmental management. We are working towards certification under IS014001. We have not been externally certified but are working towards certification.

FIFA World Cup

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which matches (a) she and (b) other Ministers in her Department attended at the FIFA World Cup 2006 in Germany in their ministerial capacity; at what cost to public funds; and with what contributions from third party organisations. (83620)

The Secretary of State for Health and Ministers in her Department attended none of the FIFA World Cup matches in their ministerial capacity, so there was no cost to public funds.

Fraser Day Hospital

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what estimate has been made by Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust of the value of the Fraser Day Hospital site in Newport Pagnell; (84915)

(2) what estimate she has made of the annual saving to Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust (PCT) of the proposed closure of the Fraser Day Hospital in Newport Pagnell, expressed in (a) real terms and (b) as a percentage of the PCT’s annual budget.

[holding answer 13 July 2006]: The continued use of the suite of rooms forming the Fraser Day Hospital for health-related services is being investigated and, as such, the value of the primary care trust’s legal interest in this accommodation is not required at the present time. The provision of local health care facilities is the responsibility of the Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust (PCT), with the support of their strategic health authority. It is for the PCT to estimate any costs of changes in service arrangements.

Healthcare Commission

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when the Healthcare Commission will begin consideration of the case of Alan Jones (Case No. C200506_0165). (84665)

The Chairman of the Healthcare Commission has confirmed that the Commission has now started to review this case. The Chairman has added that a member of the Commission’s complaints staff has contacted the complainant.

In-patient Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) patients resident in Wales and (b) other patients had been waiting more than six months for an NHS in-patient operation at an English hospital at the end of June 2006. (85012)

The information requested is not currently available. Waiting times data relating to the end of June will be published on Friday 28 July.

Maternity Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence report on maternity services was altered after completion and before publication; and if she will make a statement. (84152)

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is developing a guideline on care during labour. During the preparation of the draft guideline, the Department, as one of the instituted stakeholders, asked whether or not the available evidence precisely supported one of the recommendations made in the guideline. This related to advice on the risks and benefits of the different places of birth. NICE reflected on this, took further advice, and made a minor change to the relevant recommendation.

Multiple Sclerosis

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what representations she has received on the availability of disease-modifying therapies for people with multiple sclerosis in Staffordshire; and if she will make a statement; (84176)

(2) if she will meet the MS Society to discuss the terms of reference of the North Staffordshire Review Panel assessing the cost-effectiveness of disease- modifying therapies for people with multiple sclerosis.

The Secretary of State has received no recent representations on the availability of disease modifying therapies for people with multiple sclerosis in Staffordshire. The local health community is responsible for decisions around the provision of national health service treatment. The Multiple Sclerosis Society may wish to discuss its concerns about the terms of reference of the North Staffordshire review panel with NHS West Midlands.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has considered amending its assessment of cost effectiveness to include a factor of care time in the outcome. (84002)

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence’s (NICE) “Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal” is published on NICE’s website at www.nice.org.uk, and gives details of the methodology NICE uses in carrying out its appraisals. NICE reviews its methods guide approximately every three years following consultation with stakeholder organisations, including those representing patients, carers, health care professions and manufacturers. The guide was last updated in 2004.

Newham PCT

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of Newham Primary Care Trust's financial position; and if she will make a statement. (82064)

The 2005-06 provisional unaudited financial position of all national health service organisations was announced on 7 June. A full report on the 2005-06 NHS financial performance and a series of tables showing the financial position of all NHS organisations is available in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what progress has been made towards the six national NHS priorities in Newham Primary Care Trust area; and if she will make a statement. (82073)

It is for the local national health service to assess the primary care trust’s progress in meeting the six national NHS priorities.

NHS Complaints

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what proportion of complaints against the NHS brought to the attention of the Healthcare Commission have been referred back to the trust of origin for resolution without further investigation. (82587)

[holding answer 4 July 2006]: The chairman of the Healthcare Commission has confirmed that in 2005-06 31 per cent. of cases were referred back for further work by the health care provider concerned following a review of the local complaint handling by the Healthcare Commission.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many complaints against the NHS brought to the attention of the Healthcare Commission and not referred back to the trust of origin without further investigation are waiting to be investigated by a case manager of the Healthcare Commission; how long on average these cases have been waiting; and how many of these cases have been waiting more than (a) eight weeks, (b) six months and (c) one year from receipt of the complaint. (82588)

[holding answer 4 July 2006]: The chairman of the Healthcare Commission has confirmed that the Commission which faces a higher than expected numbers of referred cases, has introduced an eight week target to cases received since 1 April 2006. There are currently 2,261 cases awaiting further investigation, of which 1,136 are over six months old with none over 12 months old.

NHS Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment her Department has made of the financial position of primary care trusts that are significantly under their weighted capitation target; and if she will make a statement. (82063)

Our analysis of the 2005-06 financial positions of national health service organisations has shown that there is no strong relationship between financial performance and any single factor, including distance from capitation target. A full report on 2005-06 financial performance is available in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how much notice was given to primary care trusts of their financial obligation to the London risk pool; (82065)

(2) what assessment she has made of the likelihood of there being a need for additional contributions by London primary care trusts to the London strategic health authority risk pool in 2007-08;

(3) when London primary care trusts are expected to be informed of any need to contribute funds to a London strategic health authority risk pool for 2007-08;

(4) when Newham Primary Care Trust is expected to receive a refund of its contribution to the risk pool for the London strategic health authority.

The new strategic health authorities (SHAs) will take the lead locally in developing and implementing a service and financial strategy for managing the financial position within their locality. This will include creating local reserves to deal with local problems.

It is for SHAs locally to determine the level of contribution to reserves and the application of those reserves. The level determined will reflect local financial circumstances.

London primary care trusts (PCTs) were advised of their financial obligation to the London risk pool formally at the beginning of March 2006. London PCTs were made aware of this matter some weeks prior to that date via briefing from their previous local SHAs. PCT contributions will be repayable within three years with 2006-07 contributions expected to be repaid over the period 2007 to 2010. Repayment schedules are currently being agreed with deficit organisations.

The London SHA is still working on its plans for this year and is closely engaged with the Department on this issue. There is no timetable yet for the 2007-08 national operating framework and any contributions for 2007-08 will be subject to review.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will assess the effectiveness of the weighted capitation targets in addressing health inequalities in the NHS. (82068)

Tackling health inequalities is within the remit of all primary care trusts (PCTs). Those PCTs with the worst health and deprivation indicators work to support public service agreement targets to narrow the health inequalities gaps in life expectancy, cardiovascular disease and cancer between their areas and the England average. To support this work, the weighted capitation formula takes account of deprivation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether spearhead primary care trusts will be given priority when primary care trust contributions to strategic health authority risk pools are repaid. (82074)

Strategic health authorities (SHAs) are responsible for the performance management of their national health service organisations and ensuring they achieve financial balance. SHAs should take the lead locally in developing and implementing a service and financial strategy for managing the financial position within their locality. For 2006-07, this will include creating local reserves to deal with local problems.

The reserves will have to be paid back to organisations in future years when the organisations currently in deficit start producing surpluses. It will be repaid, normally in the three-year allocation period. SHAs have been asked to ensure that primary care trusts with the greatest health need are the first to be repaid.

NHS IT Support

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what progress has been made against each target on pages five and six of her Department’s publication “Delivering 21st century IT support for the NHS”; what the completion date was for each target that has been met; and what the (a) timetable and (b) targets are for phases 1, 2 and 3 set out in paragraph 3.3.1. (75123)

Nurses

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what percentage of nursing graduates found nursing jobs within (a) three months, (b) six months and (c) 12 months in each year since 1997. (86017)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average cost to public funds was of training a nurse in each year since 1997. (86018)

The estimated average annual cost to public funds of training a nursing student in each year since 1997 is shown in the table, although the data have been collected on different basis thereby making comparisons difficult.

Cost per individual—bursary or salary and tuition (£)

1997-98

11,625

1998-99

10,500

1999-2000

11,000

2000-01

13,000

2001-02

12,850

2002-03

13,690

2003-04

14,710

2004-05

15,000

Notes: 1. 1997-98 and 2004-05 are forecasts (actual outturn was only collected from 1999 onwards and the last data collected was in November 2004 covering 2003-04 outturn). 2. Average bursary costs for nurses and midwives added to tuition costs from 2000-01 onwards.

Nursing and Care Homes

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) nursing and (b) residential care homes there were in (i) the Stroud constituency and (ii) Gloucestershire in (A) 1996, (B) 2001 and (C) 2005. (77823)

Information on the number of homes was collected by the Department for the years 1996 and 2001. Table 1 shows the numbers of residential and nursing care homes in Gloucestershire as at 31 March in 1996 and 2001. Data are not available at constituency level.

Table 1: Number of residential and nursing care homes in Gloucestershire, as at 31 March 1996 and 2001

Rounded numbers

Type of home

1996

2001

Residential1

200

305

Nursing2,3

140

110

Total homes4

345

415

1 Residential data are for Gloucestershire unitary authority. 2 Nursing data are for Gloucestershire health authority. 3 Nursing data include general nursing homes, mental nursing homes and private hospitals and clinics. 4 Totals may not equal the sum of parts due to rounding. Sources:For 1996—Department of Health RAC 5 and K036 returns. For 2001—Department of Health RA and RH(N) returns.

The Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) produces data on the number of care homes and places registered as at 31 March each year, beginning with 2003. There are some definitional differences between this data and that for the years up to 2001.

I understand from the chair of CSCI that the numbers of residential and nursing care homes, as at 31 March 2005, in Gloucester and South Gloucester local authorities are as shown in table 2. Data are not available at constituency level.

Table 2: Numbers of registered care and nursing homes in Gloucester and South Gloucester local authorities, as at 31 March 2005

Local authority

Gloucester

South Gloucester

Total

Residential care

276

97

373

Nursing

64

23

87

Total

340

120

460

Source: CSCI registration and inspection database.

Ormskirk Hospital Site

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which out-patient clinics are delivered from the Ormskirk hospital site; and with what frequency each occurs. (85326)

The information requested is not held centrally. It can be obtained directly from the Southport and Ormskirk Hospital National Health Service Trust.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether the new Independent Sector Treatment Centre scheduled for the Ormskirk Hospital site will be available to provide care to the residents of (a) West Lancashire and (b) the North-West. (85485)

The Ormskirk Hospital site is one of several locations, named by the preferred bidder, from which services will be provided as part of the Cheshire and Merseyside electives surgery scheme, part of the next phase of the procurement in the independent sector treatment centre (ISTC) programme. The scheme is still currently being negotiated.

As stated in “The NHS in England: the operation framework for 2006/07”, patient choice will be extended to include any national health service foundation trust and any nationally procured ISTC, and any other subsequently centrally accredited independent-sector providers.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether the medical interventions planned at the Independent Sector Treatment Centre scheduled for the Ormskirk Hospital site require support from (a) an intensive care unit and (b) a high dependency unit. (85486)

The case mix planned for the Cheshire and Merseyside electives surgery scheme includes gynaecology, ear, nose and throat, gastroenterology, orthopaedics, general surgery and plastics. Detailed discussions are still in progress between the bidder and the Southport and Ormskirk National Health Service Trust but at this stage, it is anticipated that, if required, the independent sector treatment centre will follow the protocol established at Ormskirk Hospital, which is to use intensive care and high dependency facilities at Southport Hospital.

Osteoporosis

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what advice and assistance is made available to encourage GPs to take advantage through practice-based commissioning of programmes to identify patients at risk of osteoporosis; and if she will make a statement. (81621)

To maximise the benefits of practice- based commissioning (PBC), the Department has resourced and put in place a comprehensive programme providing training, support, and guidance material for general practitioner (GP) practices and primary care trusts (PCTs).

This includes publication of the document “Practice based commissioning: early wins and top tips”, which contains tips to support PBC and suggestions as to how it can be used to redesign care pathways. This publication is available on the Department's website at www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/12/82/74/04128274.pdf and has been issued directly to all GP practices.

This document does not specifically encourage GPs to take advantage of programmes to identify patients for their risk of osteoporosis. However, the document does encourage GP practices to take the principles of the case studies featured and extend these to providing services tailored to a particular practice's local population.

Oxygen Supplies

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what recent assessment she has made of whether the companies which hold Home Oxygen therapy contracts are meeting the required service levels. (83992)

The transfer of patients to new suppliers is taking place over a six-month transitional period that ends on 31 July 2006. Working with the national health service, we are closely monitoring each company’s capacity to deliver the required standard of service to all patients using oxygen therapy in the home. During this period, there is continuous assessment of suppliers with regular meetings to discuss suppliers’ reports on progress and action to tackle emerging issues.

Paediatric Special Care

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps she is taking to ensure that sick babies receive the special care they require. (86014)

The Department has facilitated the development of 24 neonatal managed clinical networks to provide the safest and most effective service for mothers and babies. Since April 2003 over £70 million additional funding has been made available to support the development of networks. It is for individual networks to ensure there is an appropriate level of provision, including special care, to meet prevalent local demand.

Payment by Results

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans she has to review the policy of payment by results in respect of the treatment and care of premature babies in the NHS; and if she will make a statement. (85724)

There are currently no tariffs for neonatal intensive care. Critical care is outside the scope of payment by results, and funding for the service continues to be locally negotiated between commissioners and providers. The range of services covered by payment by results is kept under review.

Prescription Charges (Exemptions)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when the list of foods and medicines exempt from prescription charges for those with certain medical conditions will be reviewed. (84886)

Certain foods are listed in part XV of the drug tariff in order that they may be prescribed. We have no plans to extend the existing list of medical conditions that give exemption from prescription charges.

Prescription charges are currently being looked at by the Health Committee as part of its inquiry into national health service charges.

Primary Care Trust Budgets

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether funding for specialist myalgic encephalomyelitis/encephaliopathy and chronic fatigue syndrome services is contained within the baseline budget of primary care trusts. (85325)

I can confirm that funding for specialist chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis services is included in the baseline budgets for primary care trusts.

Waiting Time Target

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how many category A projects have so far been established, as described on page 26 of her Department's document “18 Week Patient Pathway: Delivery Resource Pack”, where they have been established in each case; for which medical procedures they have been established; what conclusions have so far been drawn from the projects; when she expects the projects to conclude; and if she will make a statement; (84418)

(2) which pioneer sites to assess the prospects for delivery of the 18-week waiting time target amongst category B procedures deemed high risk have so far been established; on which procedures they are concentrating in each case; where they are situated; and if she will make a statement.

The areas of greatest challenge identified in the delivery resource pack in relation to 18 weeks are orthopaedics, endoscopy, echocardiography and audiology. National projects are required in these category ‘A’ areas.

In orthopaedics, a co-ordinating group of key stakeholders has been established, and a musculoskeletal services framework was published on 12 July 2006 on the Department's and the 18 week patient pathway websites. Work continues to identify and then tackle local performance levels.

In endoscopy, work is well under way to identify performance levels and best practice, building on the work begun by the NHS Modernisation Agency. In cardiology, the project is identifying those tests that present the greatest challenge in terms of intervention rates and performance, including echocardiography.

In audiology, most adult hearing services are accessed directly from primary care, and are therefore provided outside of the pathways covered by the 18-week target. However, waiting times for adult hearing services are too long and do need to be tackled, not least to ensure that referrals to such services are not diverted via ear, nose and throat departments (which are covered by 18 weeks) to benefit from the 18-week maximum wait that will apply by December 2008. Work is under way at official level, with stakeholders to be involved, and a plan will be published in due course, following ministerial approval.

In terms of the high risk, category B areas, the eight 18-week pioneer health communities will soon turn their attention from developing the mechanisms by which whole pathways will be measured to redesigning pathways in the high risk areas identified in the delivery resource pack. The table shows the specialties being addressed by each of the pioneers. Magnetic resonance imaging, computerised tomography and non-obstetric ultrasound diagnostic tests are being addressed as part of these pathways.

Pioneer health community

Delivery solutions being addressed

East Kent

General surgery, gastroenterology, orthopaedics, cardiology

Huntingdonshire

Orthopaedics, endoscopy, neurology, dermatology

North Nottinghamshire

Gastroenterology, gynaecology, rheumatology, diabetes

Devon and Exeter

Cardiology, oral surgery, diabetes, plastic surgery

Gateshead

Orthopaedics, cardiology, rheumatology

King's

Orthopaedics, audiology, respiratory medicine

North East Sector of Greater Manchester

Trauma and orthopaedics, general surgery, general medicine

South Bedfordshire

Urology, ears, nose and throat, cardiology, ophthalmology

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) whether she has identified an 18-week pathway clinical lead; and what the role of the clinical lead will be; (84456)

(2) what progress she has made in establishing the stakeholder group to support delivery of the 18-week waiting time target.

Dr. David Colin-Thomé has been appointed clinical lead for the 18 weeks programme in addition to his role as national clinical director for primary care, as announced in “Tackling Hospital Waiting: The 18 Week Patient Pathway—An Implementation Framework” (paragraph 3.4). Dr. Colin-Thomé's role on 18 weeks is to lead engagement with the clinical community, act as national lead for the clinical leads of particular specialty areas, co-chair the 18-week stakeholder group and provide advice on implementation issues as they arise.

The 18-week pathway stakeholder group is made up of nominees from a range of national organisations, senior clinicians, managers and patients. It is intended that the group should normally meet monthly, alternating between the full group and a subset made up of the strategic health authority leads for 18 weeks. The subset met for the first time in June. The full group should meet for the first time in September.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what challenges to delivering the 18-week waiting time target have so far been identified by her Department; and which of these challenges are being used in the campaign to highlight key challenges from May; (84468)

(2) what key messages have been agreed to support delivery of the 18-week waiting time target, as stated on page 22 of her Department's document, “18 Week Patient Pathway: Delivery Resource Pack”, published on 10th May 2006.

Key areas of challenge to delivering the 18-week waiting target were outlined in section two of the publication, “Tackling Hospital Waiting: The 18 Week Patient Pathway—An Implementation Framework”. Since publication, national projects have begun in orthopaedics and endoscopy, and the national project in cardiology is in development. Work is under way at official level on an audiology action plan and this will be published in due course following ministerial approval. The 18-week programme team and the Department have highlighted the key challenges at numerous events in the past few months, including the NHS Confederation conference. The team will shortly be holding events in each of the new strategic heath authorities to help prepare for delivery.

This publication, which is available in the Library and on the Department's website at: www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/13/46/69/04134669.pdf also sets out the key messages for all groups involved in the delivery of 18 weeks, including the key actions required by various parties.

Written Answers to Questions

Tuesday 18 July 2006

International Development

Afghanistan

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what his suggested alternatives are for income generation for poppy growers in (a) Helmand province and (b) other Afghan provinces. (85758)

After decades of conflict, the lack of investment in basic infrastructure, poor governance and drought, much of Afghanistan's productivity has been lost or re-directed towards poppy cultivation and drug trafficking. As 70 per cent. of the population are rural, agriculture provides the best opportunity for alternative income generation.

Helmand province was once one of the most agriculturally advanced and productive areas in Afghanistan. It might have the potential to be so again. For examples, the DFID-funded research into alternative livelihoods programme (RALF) is looking at the export potential of grapes, tomatoes, mushrooms egg plants and okra in Helmand and has made contacts with raisin importers, which involves organic and fair trade. The programme is also evaluating at least 10 different small scale agri-processing industries such as tomato paste production.

Growth in small and medium enterprises and construction has the potential to bring new employment opportunities in all 34 provinces of Afghanistan. DFID supports the micro finance investment support facility programme, which provides much needed credit for investment in agriculture, manufacturing, retail and service industries. To date, the programme has brought financial services for some 161,000 people in and around half of the provinces of Afghanistan.

The development of Afghanistan's natural resources could also provide alternative jobs. Afghanistan possesses energy and mineral resources, many of which are underdeveloped, such as coal, gas, oil, precious metals and semi-precious stones. DFID is funding the British Geological Survey to strengthen the Afghan Geological Survey to develop and promote the mining sector.

Angola

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what support is (a) provided and (b) planned for (i) land mine clearance and (ii) transport infrastructure developments in Angola. (85537)

DFID has provided over £1.1 million for land mine clearance work in Angola since 2003. A further £400,000 will be spent this year to support land mine clearance activities in the country.

DFID is currently funding the work of two mine action NGOs operating in Angola—the Halo Trust and the Mine Awareness Group. Most of this work is taking place in areas where humanitarian operations are ongoing in order to allow UN Agencies such as the World Food Programme to access populations in need, and to do so safely.

DFID's aid programme in Angola is focused on providing support to meet urgent humanitarian needs. Funding for transport infrastructure has been made in the context of support provided for humanitarian programming. DFID provided £1.15 million to the WFP last year to support the construction of bridges to enable quicker humanitarian access to populations in need. This support has also reduced costs because aid can now travel by road instead of only by air transport.

Support for infrastructure development in southern Africa has been identified as a priority area in DFID's southern Africa regional plan. Angola will benefit from this work, which is currently at the design stage.

Darfur

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development if he will place in the Library a copy of the joint UN-African Union technical assessment mission report on Darfur. (85341)

The United Nations-African Union technical assessment mission recently returned from Darfur. Their report has yet to be released, though it is expected before the end of July. We expect that it will make recommendations on how the UN can support the African Union, and ultimately take over in Darfur. We do not know yet what form the report will take. It may be an oral briefing, a letter from Kofi Annan or a formal written report. Assuming any written report is made public, I will arrange for copies to be placed in the Libraries of the House.

Malawi

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what funding the Government are providing for water and sanitation projects in Malawi. (85916)

DFID is co-financing a Concern Universal project with the European Union Water Facility. The project is in two districts of Malawi and will deliver 550 boreholes, household sanitation, and training, and help build capacity in the districts. DFID is contributing £620,000 over five years, which is 25 per cent. of the overall funding.

DFID has agreed to co-finance a project in 13 districts of Malawi if the NGO consortium involved can secure European Union Water Facility funding. The consortium of six NGOs is led by Concern Universal and also includes Oxfam, Emmanuel International and World Vision. This project will work with local government and is expected to deliver over 3,000 functioning boreholes and safe sanitation for 250,000 people. DFID has agreed to contribute £860,000 over five years which is 25 per cent. of the overall funding.

DFID is funding WaterAid to complete a nationwide digital map showing who has and does not have access to a safe water supply. This tool will help the Government and others to concentrate their efforts on supplying water to those who have no access at present. DFID is spending £65,000 on this work.

As part of support to primary education, DFID has been funding improvements to primary school water supply and sanitation for the past nine years. In 2005, DFID spent approximately £1,000,000 on primary school water supply and sanitation in Malawi. Apart from their health benefits, the availability of latrines and their sensitive siting is one of a number of factors that can help keep girls at school.

Somalia

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what aid programmes are supported by his Department in Somalia; and by which local administrations aid is delivered. (85004)

DFID has a rising aid programme in Somalia. Subject to political and other developments within Somalia, this year we plan to disburse approximately £15.5 million, of which around 40 per cent. is likely to be spent in Somaliland. This is planned to rise further next year, again with a substantial portion benefiting Somaliland—either as support for specific Somaliland activities or as part of a Somalia-wide programme.

Our programmes in Somalia are focused around three objectives agreed:

i. To help achieve a just and viable political settlement in Somalia. Programmes include a Dialogue for Peace project and Democratisation project through WSP International.

ii. To work with others to establish the basis for effective development assistance, with an initial focus on improving governance and service delivery. Programmes include a partnership agreement with UNICEF and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) for support to primary education and a United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Rule of Law Programme supporting re-establishment and strengthening of police services and justice systems.

iii. To ensure timely provision of humanitarian relief. For example, we provided approximately £13 million in response to the recent drought in the Horn of Africa, specifically for relief in Somalia.

We do not provide bilateral aid directly to any Somali authority; however, projects under the objectives above, undertaken by the UN and NGOs, involve collaboration with local and regional authorities and the Transitional Federal Government in their delivery.

Solicitor-General

Foreign Travel

To ask the Solicitor-General how much was spent on foreign travel by the Law Officers’ Departments in each of the last eight years. (76066)

The Law Officers’ Departments have spent the following amounts on foreign travel in the last eight years. Figures are rounded to the nearest thousand, or hundred if under 1,000. All foreign travel by Ministers and officials is undertaken in accordance with the Ministerial Code and the Civil Service Management Code.

£

Crown Prosecution Service

Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office

Serious Fraud Office

Treasury Solicitor's Department

Attorney General's Office

HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate

1998-99

25,000

1

55,000

8,000

21,000

1999-2000

39,000

1

114,000

200

15,000

2000-01

77,000

1

191,000

600

25,000

2001-02

151,000

1

203,000

5,000

28,000

2002-03

166,000

1

110,000

7,000

61,000

2003-04

281,000

1

204,000

8,000

82,000

2004-05

135,000

1

186,000

12,000

23,000

1,000

2005-06

166,000

20,000

2317,000

14,000

63,000

1 RCPO was established on 18 April 2005.

2 Provisional figures pending finalisation of 2005-06 accounts.

Law Officers Departmental Report

To ask the Solicitor-General how many copies of the Law Officers departmental report 2006, were produced; at what cost; to whom copies were sent; at what cost; who was consulted prior to publication; how members of the public can obtain copies; at what cost; and if he will make a statement. (78601)

The Stationery Office produced 780 copies of Cm 6821, “Law Officers' Departments Report 2006”. Of the 780 copies, the Law Officers' Departments received 320 copies at a cost of £4,248. The 320 were allocated as follows:

Number of copies allocated

Attorney-General's Office

20

Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)

180

HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate

20

Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office

50

Serious Fraud Office

25

Treasury Solicitor's Office

25

Copies of the report are circulated within departments, including the 42 CPS geographical areas, and to criminal justice system partners. No central records are kept of individual recipients or cost of distribution.

The report is prepared within all the Law Officers Departments. Treasury and other CJS Departments are consulted during preparation.

A hard copy of the report can be obtained through the Stationery Office priced £14.75. It is also available on the Law Officers departments websites.

Transport

A303

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what estimate his Department has made of the level of traffic flow on the A303 during the 2012 Olympics. (86099)

The Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) will be responsible for identifying the roads to be included in the Olympic route network and considering their impact on traffic flows, as well as on the roads adjoining them. The ODA will also consider the general traffic flow caused by Olympic spectators.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what estimate his Department has made of the economic effects on the south-west region of the implementation of the published scheme for improvements to the A303 at Stonehenge in the first year after construction. (86100)

Our estimate of the economic benefits of this scheme does not distinguish between the economic benefits to the south-west and to other regions.

Air Traffic Control

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what reports he has received on the possible effects of wind turbines and wind farms on air traffic control radars; and what recent discussions he has had with representatives of the Civil Aviation Authority on the matter. (86264)

On 3 July 2006, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) issued a Civil Aviation Publication (CAP 764) entitled “Policy and Guidelines on Wind Turbines”. This guidance provides assistance to aviation stakeholders when addressing wind energy related issues and includes a description of the various areas of aviation, including radar, which have the potential to be affected by wind turbine developments. The guidance is available on the CAA website at www.caa.co.uk/cap764

We have regular meetings with various stakeholders, including representatives from the CAA, to discuss a range of issues.

Asylum Seekers

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many asylum seekers have applied for (a) full and (b) provisional driving licences in the last year for which figures are available. (85102)

Automatic Identification System

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what plans he has to tackle the vulnerability of automatic identification systems to pirates. (86263)

The Department has already advised masters of UK and Red Ensign Group registered shipping that they may temporarily cease broadcasting automatic identification system signals when in open waters, if they judge that the security of the vessel is being compromised by them. More detailed advice to masters on this issue is contained in the Department’s counter piracy note issued to mariners, published in November 2005, as Marine Guidance Note 298.

The Department has also reached an agreement with an internet provider of AIS information to introduce a package of risk mitigation measures including a time delay and a reduction in the quantity of information accessible from the site.

Cycling

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the merits of the introduction of regulations requiring all (a) new bicycles to be fitted with operational lights and (b) purchasers to be provided with safety helmets; and if he will make a statement. (85529)

No formal assessment has been made of the merits or otherwise of introducing regulations to require all new bicycles to be fitted with operational lights and all purchasers to be provided with safety helmets.

Existing regulations require the use of lights on pedal cycles between sunset and sunrise: non-compliance is an offence. Requiring the fitment of operational lights at point of sale would not ensure that the lights were thereafter maintained in working order, nor would it ensure that riders turned them on. However, such regulation would deprive cyclists of choice, as there are several legally acceptable varieties of cycle lights, ranging from dynamo to battery-operated and steady to flashing, from which cyclists are currently free to choose.

Our policy on cycle helmets is to persuade cyclists to protect themselves by using them, but providing helmets with each new bicycle would not guarantee that they would be used. The Government will keep their policies in this—as in all areas—under review in the light of discussion in Parliament and elsewhere.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what steps are being taken to promote cycling in cities outside London; and how much was paid in grants supporting the promotion of cycling in each of the last five years. (85530)

Funding for cycling outside London is primarily provided through the local transport plan system which funds local highway authorities. We do not have a breakdown between cities and other areas. Expenditure on cycling outside London for the past five years is set out in the following table:

LTP spend on cycling schemes as reported by local highway authorities

Spend on cycling (£000)

2001-02

29,583

2002-03

39,889

2003-04

32,128

2004-05

39,891

2005-06

35,387

In addition, we created Cycling England in March 2005 with a budget of £5 million per annum to work with local authorities and others to co-ordinate the development of cycling. The Secretary of State recently announced a doubling of its annual budget to £10 million per annum for the next three years. Cycling England is investing £8.4 million over three years in six cycle demonstration towns—Aylesbury, Brighton, Darlington, Derby, Exeter and Lancaster.

In addition the Department has spent over £12 million on the links to school programme between 2003-04 and 2004-05. We also provided £4.47 million between 2002-03 and 2003-04 through our cycling projects fund to support nearly 300 local cycling projects across England.

Bus Routes

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) how many applications (a) to change and (b) to modify bus routes have been made to the traffic commissioners in each area of England in each of the last three years for which figures are available; (85372)

(2) on how many occasions the traffic commissioners have intervened (a) to prevent and (b) to modify a change to a bus route of which they had been notified in each of the last three years for which figures are available.

[holding answers 14 July 2006]: The traffic commissioner must accept all properly completed applications to register or vary a local bus service. New registrations can only be refused where the operator concerned has a condition on their licence which prevents them from providing the service as applied for.

Information on the number of new and varied local bus service registrations is published in the traffic commissioners annual report. Copies of the publications are available in the House of Commons Library and can also be found on the DFT website at:

http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_control/documents/contentservertemplate/dft_index.hcst?n=9759&l=3

Child Seats (Cars)

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what plans he has for publicising the new regulations on the use of child seats in cars. (84828)

Advertising consisting of press, online, and radio activity will commence on 24 July and will run until mid-September explaining the change to the law and encouraging people to ring our campaign hotline for further information.

PR activity will run from week commencing 17 July beginning with the GMTV car safety week with features on TV each morning. Thereafter, we shall continue to target national and local press and broadcast media, online media and magazines until the end of September, encouraging features as children return to school.

Road safety officers in local authorities will also be raising awareness of the new regulations. Stakeholder and brand partner materials have been developed for local use including posters, leaflets and online creative, full details of which are available on the THINK! road safety website—www.thinkroadsafety.gov.uk—along with full details of the new regulations.

Commercial partners are also lending support—Mothercare, Halfords and Toys R Us will be raising awareness of the new regulations and disseminating literature to their customers.

Congestion (Liverpool)

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what steps he is taking to relieve congestion in the Hall lane strategic gateway; and if he will make a statement. (86093)

The local highway authority, Liverpool city council, is responsible for tackling congestion and the delivery of improvements in the Hall lane strategic gateway.

We provisionally approved the Hall lane improvement scheme for funding through the local transport plan programme in 2000 and the Edge lane west scheme in 2004. It is for the city council to obtain the necessary statutory powers for the implementation of these schemes before seeking final funding approval from the Department.

Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the reason is for the delay in his reply to the letter of 24 April 2006 from Wiltshire county council about rail services in Wiltshire. (85215)

Crossrail

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much has been spent on the Crossrail project in each year since 2004-05. (84606)

The amounts spent on the Crossrail project in each year since 2004-05 are shown in the following table. The figures provided set out expenditure by both Cross London Rail Links Ltd, and the Department for Transport.

£ million

Financial year

CLRL costs

DfT costs

2004-5

44.4

2,657,209

2005-06

41.4

3,664,948

2006-07 (to June 06)

21.1

944,571

Dart Harbour and Navigation Authority

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 26 June 2006, Official Report, column 33W, on the Dart Harbour and Navigation Authority, when he expects to provide the substantive reply. (86440)

Detrunking

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to his answer of 6 July 2006, Official Report, column 1267W, on detrunking, what additional funds have been provided to each local authority in the 2006-07 financial year to meet the cost of maintaining the detrunked roads; what proportion of that authority's total allocated funds for its local transport plan the additional amount represents; and if he will make a statement. (85047)

The data required to make the calculation can be found on the Department's website.

The breakdown of routine maintenance funding for 2006-07 for each local authority in England with a detrunked road can be found in the maintenance of roads grant determination 2006. The grant information is available on the Department's website at: http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_roads/documents/page/dft_roads_611492.hcsp

The additional capital maintenance funding provided to each of these local authorities for their detrunked roads can be found in the local transport plan settlement decision letters, issued in December 2005. The letters also contain details of each authority's local transport capital settlement for financial year 2006-07. These letters are also available on the Department's website at: http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/qroups/dft_localtrans/documents/divisionhomepage/610730.hcsp.

Digital Tachographs

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when driver cards for digital tachographs will be available in the UK. (84834)

Driver cards for digital tachographs have been available in this country for over a year. The Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency issued its first such card on 5 July 2005.

Driving Licences

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what facilities there are for non-UK nationals to obtain a driving licence from a local Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency. (85164)

The agency operates a premium checking facility at four local offices located at Wimbledon, Glasgow, Nottingham and DVLA reception area in Swansea. It is available to holders of full EEA, Gibraltar and designated countries driving licences exchanging their licences for a UK one. The designated countries are:

Australia, Barbados, British Virgin Islands, Canada, Falkland Islands, Hong Kong, Japan, Monaco, New Zealand, Republic of Korea1, Singapore, South Africa, Switzerland and Zimbabwe.

Applicants opting to use this service must hold a current passport from one of the countries referred to above. In these circumstances staff will check their application for accuracy and completeness and return their passport to them over the counter. A fee of £4 is levied for this service.

1Motorcycle entitlement from the Republic of Korea is not exchangeable.

First Great Western

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he was first informed of First Great Western’s plans for increases in peak-time travel prices. (84097)

The Department was first informed of First Great Western’s intended fares strategy in its franchise bid received in September 2005. First Great Western has already implemented a new range of fares which offer significantly lower prices than anything previously available for both first and standard class travel for passengers who book ahead. In addition, since the commencement of the franchise in April, First Great Western has obtained secure station accreditation status at a further five stations as part of a continuing programme and have also signed two major contracts worth nearly £150 million which will significantly improve the interiors and technical reliability of the high speed train fleet over the next 18 months.

Foreign Vehicle (Road Traffic Offences)

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what action his Department is taking to ensure that owners of foreign vehicles guilty of traffic offences in the UK pay their fines. (85687)

The Government are aware that it can be too easy for non-UK resident drivers to avoid paying fines when found guilty of traffic offences. We are determined to address this and enabling provisions for a new system of graduated fixed penalties are contained in the Road Safety Bill currently before Parliament. These provisions will also allow enforcement agencies to take an immediate cash deposit, equal to a fixed penalty notice or court- imposed fine, from foreign drivers who commit offences, bringing us into line with our continental neighbours.

The graduated fixed penalties and deposit scheme, could be in place during next year and should improve compliance through increased deterrence as well as providing for more effective enforcement.

Freight Containers

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 6 July 2006, Official Report, column 1268W, on freight containers, what proportion of the containers in use on the UK’s roads will be affected by these changes. (84862)

Directive 96/53/EC effectively prohibits the carriage of conventional 45ft ISO deep sea containers. In 2004 there were an estimated 142,000 of these containers in circulation worldwide—around 1.4 per cent. of the deep sea container market—but we have no data on the numbers that may be in use on UK roads.

As the directive includes a 10-year derogation until 31 December 2006 which permits the carriage of such containers on oversize vehicles in service before implementation, there are expected to be few in number, and that those containers still in circulation can be used elsewhere other than on the EU road network.

Government Car Fleet

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what safety considerations are taken into account when choosing Government vehicles; and if he will make a statement. (85168)

The Department for Transport is a member of the European new car assessment programme (EuroNCAP). Performance against the EuroNCAP tests is one of the criteria the Government Car and Despatch Agency uses when choosing suitable official cars.

Heysham M6 Link

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether the Heysham M6 Link has received funding approval. (86397)

We are currently considering Lancashire county council's business case for the inclusion of the Heysham to M6 link road in the Department's programme of major schemes. A decision on programme entry for this scheme and funding from the Department will only be taken once we have resolved a number of appraisal issues. Should the scheme be approved for programme entry, our response of 6 July to the north-west region on Regional Funding Allocations confirms that we would expect to provide funding for this scheme during the period 2009-10 to 2015-16 but only subject to it securing all necessary statutory approvals.

High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether it is his policy to prevent coaches from using high occupancy vehicle lanes. (84832)

The issue of whether to allow coaches to use high occupancy (HOV) lanes is still being considered. Coaches are clearly high occupancy vehicles but they are speed restricted, which could therefore impede the flow of traffic in the HOV lane. A key consideration is whether the proposed HOV lane is on the outside of the motorway (as proposed for M1 junction 7 to 10) or the inside of the motorway (as proposed for M62/M606).

A final decision will only be made once we have finalised the exact details of each scheme and we have satisfied ourselves that the lanes will operate safely.

Left-hand Drive Vehicles

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what his most recent estimate is of the percentage of left-hand drive vehicles on British roads; what estimate he has made of the proportion of road accidents which involved left-hand drive vehicles in the last 12 months; and if he will make a statement. (84836)

Information on the number or percentage of left-hand drive vehicles on British roads is not available. In 2005, there were 1,760 personal injury road accidents reported to the police involving left-hand drive foreign registered vehicles. The total number of personal road injury accidents was 198,735. The proportion of road accidents involving left-hand drive foreign registered vehicles was just under 1 per cent.

Rail Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether the east coast main line south of York will be operating at full capacity when additional train paths are allocated to GNER on the Leeds to London section; and if he will make a statement. (85014)

A route utilisation strategy for the east coast main line is being prepared by Network Rail. The analysis that will underpin this strategy will include an assessment of the capacity of the route, and an assessment of the most effective use of that capacity. The consultation draft for this strategy is expected to be published before the end of this year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what work he has commissioned on the development of a high speed rail link from London to Scotland. (85236)

The Government made a manifesto commitment to look at the feasibility and affordability of a new north-south high speed link. The Government have committed to take this forward in the development of a long-term strategy for the railways, drawing on Sir Rod Eddington’s advice on the long-term impact of transport decisions on the UK’s productivity, stability and growth. In so doing the Department will draw on a range of evidence and commissioned work.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 27 June 2006, Official Report, column 264W, on South West Trains, when he expects to respond to the letter from the South Hampshire Rail Users Group; and if he will place a copy of his response in the Library. (85278)

The letter was replied to on 13 July, and a copy has been placed in the Libraries of the House.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport for what reason and upon whose authority King's Cross station was closed for several days recently following a fire on a nearby building site; what provisions are in place to ensure that major transport routes into London are not prematurely or unnecessarily closed; and if he will make a statement. (85285)

These are operational matters for Network Rail, as the owner and operator of the national rail network. The hon. Member should contact Network Rail's chief executive at the following address for a response to his question:

Mr. John Armitt

Chief Executive

Network Rail

40 Melton Street

London NW1 2EE

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what plans he has to authorise the transfer of railway interchange stations in London from Network Rail to Transport for London; and if he will make a statement. (85531)

The Department for Transport is currently involved in discussions with Transport for London regarding the manner in which rail interchange stations within London are operated in the future. As these stations are Network Rail's assets, the final arrangements for any transfer would be a matter for Transport for London and Network Rail.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what advice he has given to Transport for London in respect of the operation of services on the East London line after the proposed extension has been completed. (85532)

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much his Department has spent on Crossrail; and how much he expects to spend by the end of the 2007-08 financial year. (85565)

The then Secretary of State allocated £154 million to CLRL for Crossrail in 2001. The amount spent by CLRL is shown in the table, as well as expenditure within the Department for Transport since 2003-04, when the Crossrail hybrid Bill was introduced. In December 2005, the then Secretary of State allocated a further £100 million for the continued development of the project and support of the hybrid Bill. The Department is discussing with CLRL what further sums would be needed for the period to Royal Assent, which is hoped for during 2007.

Financial year

CLRL costs (£ million)

DfT costs (£)

2001-02

5.3

2002-03

25.2

2003-04

31.5

1,445,019

2004-05

44.4

2,657,209

2005-06

41.4

3,664,948

2006-07 (to June 2006)

21.1

944,571

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many incidents of people riding on the outside of moving trains were reported to the British Transport police in (a) 2004 and (b) 2005; how many have been reported in 2006; what measures are being taken to prevent such incidents; and if he will make a statement. (85813)

This information is not held by the Department for Transport. Information relating to incidents of people riding on the outside of moving trains and reported to the British Transport police is held by the force who can be contacted at:

British Transport Police

25 Camden Road

London NW1 9LN

E-mail: general.enquiries@btp.pnn.police.uk

Road Safety

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many road accidents were caused (a) directly and (b) indirectly by the driver using a mobile phone in the last period for which figures are available. (85414)

The information available relates to factors that are judged by the police as having contributed to a road accident in which someone was injured. The number of personal injury road accidents reported to the police that have "Driver using mobile phone" assigned as a contributory factor in 2005 was 429.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many (a) fatalities and (b) injuries in road accidents there were in (i) Sunderland city council area and (ii) Houghton and Washington, East constituency in each year since 1997. (85423)

The number of (a) fatalities and (b) injuries in personal injury road accidents reported to the police in (i) Sunderland local authority and (ii) Houghton and Washington, East constituency in each year from 1997 to 2005 are shown in the table. Constituency level data for 2005 are not yet available.

Sunderland local authorityHoughton and Washington, East constituency

(a) Killed

(b) Injured

(a) Killed

(b) Injured

1997

15

1,460

8

454

1998

11

1,344

5

456

1999

11

1,295

9

421

2000

4

1,342

1

454

2001

8

1,307

6

449

2002

10

1,245

5

406

2003

8

1,338

6

442

2004

8

1,228

5

402

2005

10

1,091

Roads

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport which road repair project being carried out by the Highways Agency has been allocated the most funding. (85490)

The M25 Holmesdale tunnel refurbishment project has a total forecasted cost of £70 million. It comprises repairs to the existing road, the tunnel structure and associated mechanical and electrical equipment.

Roadside Checks

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many roadside checks have been carried out on defective brakes during each of the past 24 months; what the nature is of such tests; and what conclusions he has drawn from the results. (85167)

The Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) is responsible for roadside enforcement. Greater detail on the results of their work is published in its effectiveness report which is available on-line at www.vosa.gov.uk.

The following table is based on financial year and amalgamates roadside checks and fleet checks. The data cannot be broken down further without disproportionate cost.

2004-05

2005-06

Prohibitions issued in relation to brakes

24,955

25,357

Percentage of vehicle encounters that resulted in such prohibitions

14.4

13.9

Although visual inspection will identify the majority of potential defects, VOSA staff can also utilise temperature checks and roller brake tester equipment.

Brake defects are in the top 10 fail items for heavy goods vehicles, trailers and passenger service vehicles at roadside and fleet checks and annual test. Defects in braking systems are a concern.

Stansted Airport

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what discussions he has had with the new owners of the British Airports Authority on the continued development of a second runway at Stansted airport; and if he will make a statement. (86266)

The Secretary of State for Transport has met the chairman of Grupo Ferrovial SA to discuss their plans for BAA.

On 6 July, ADI, the consortium led by Ferrovial, confirmed its commitment to developing a second runway at Stansted as soon as possible although it would review the costs and plans for the second runway. A press release on this announcement can be found on BAA’s website.

Transport Direct

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the value for money of the Transport Direct portal. (85818)

The original business case for Transport Direct recorded three key value for money measures:

Achieve one million user sessions in the first year of service.

Achieve 10 million user sessions by the end of 2006.

10 per cent. of users reassess their travel habits as a result of the information provided by Transport Direct.

Of these measures:

The one millionth user session was achieved ten months after soft-launch of the service (soft-launched in July 2004, achieved in May 2005)

We are on course to achieve our ten millionth user session by the end of 2006.

Early results of user surveys have indicated that 64 per cent. of those who completed our surveys were considering a change of travel mode preference.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment has been made of the impact of the Transport Direct portal on journey decisions, including modal shift. (85820)

The portal service includes a self-completion feedback questionnaire that has been designed to form part of the independent evaluation framework for the portal. The analysis of the first 1,002 forms (December 2005) indicates that:

64 per cent. of users who responded indicated a change of original travel mode preference for at least part of the journey.

In 33 per cent. of cases the respondent had made the journey previously and of these 51 per cent. indicated a change in original mode preference.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many visitor hits Transport Direct has received; and what its advertising expenditure has been since it became operational. (85821)

Transport Direct usage is recorded in “user sessions”. A user session is defined as:

“One continuous dialogue with the Transport Direct Portal through one browser window”.”

By the end of June 2006 Transport Direct had recorded 6,055,702 user sessions. The current rate is around 150,000 user sessions a week, viewing an average of seven to eight pages each.

Advertising costs across the financial years 2004-05 to 2005-06 were £1,063,000.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport why the default setting for the cost of car travel on the Transport Direct portal is for fuel costs. (85822)

The portal provides the user with two choices for assessing the costs of car travel. One is “fuel costs”; including exceptional costs such as tolls, ferry charges and congestion charges, and the other is ‘total running costs’ which take into account the cost of owning a car.

Transport Direct’s purpose is to give users an impartial series of travel options and to enable them to select choices that meet their needs. Market research strongly indicates that motorists are overwhelmingly interested in seeing information about the ‘point of use’ of costs of their car. Therefore the default is to display the fuel costs and other direct costs. Showing full costs as the default would result in this functionality not being used by the majority of motorists, thus negating any potential effect on their travel choice.

Users do have the option to select an estimate of the total running costs. This is based on advice and information provided by the major motoring organisations and provides a figure which reflects the total cost of motoring, on a per mile basis. If the user chooses this option, then fuel costs, the exceptional costs and the total ownership costs are displayed.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much it cost to construct www.transportdirect.info; and how much it has cost to operate a month on average. (82210)

The information is as follows:

Construction of www.transportdirect.info.

Overall capital spend on the Transport Direct portal design, build and operate (DBO) contract has been as follows:

Period

£ million

2002-03

1.3

2003-04

9.3

2004-05

9.6

2005-06

7.3

2006-07

0.4

Total to end March 2006

27.9

These figures represent the sums paid to Atos Origin (the DBO contractor) for all aspects of the DBO contract excluding non-capital elements.

The DBO contract has been just one part of the overall Transport Direct programme. Whilst the portal DBO contract cost more than we originally estimated, the overall programme budget under spent.

Operational costs are in the region of £225,000-£250,000 per calendar month, while data supply costs are in the region of £100,000 per month.

Vehicle Excise Duty Licences

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many vehicle excise duty licences were paid in each band, including goods vehicles, for the most recently available year; and how many licences in each band were paid for by (a) private individuals and (b) incorporated businesses. (83959)

DVLA estimates the number of vehicle licences issued within each band for the “Private and Light Goods” tax class, as the following table:

Estimate of licences issued for Private and Light Goods vehicles, 2004-05

Class

Licences issued

Band A

543

Band B

392,320

Band C

4,710,235

Band D

3,907,106

Band E

3,039,718

Band F

2,945,879

Band G

1,618,549

Cars registered before 1 March 2001

22,388,865

Total

39,003,215

Additionally, 554,153 licences were issued for heavy goods vehicles in 2004-05. No statistical information is available to indicate how many licences in each band were paid for by (a) private individuals and (b) incorporated businesses.