Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 459: debated on Monday 30 April 2007

Written Answers to Questions

Monday 30 April 2007

International Development

Bolivia

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development when a Minister from his Department last visited Bolivia. (134145)

The former Secretary of State for International Development, the right hon. Member for Birmingham, Ladywood (Clare Short) visited Bolivia in August 1999.

Colombia: Refugees

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what contribution the UK Government has made to the UN High Commission for Refugees in response to its appeal for funds in connection with Colombia; and if he will make a statement. (134594)

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Global Appeal 2007 is currently under review by donors. In 2006, the UK Government provided £27,536,000 to the UNHCR global appeal. DFID’s contribution was £25,863,000. There were also contributions from the Home Office (£1,214,000) and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (£459,000). DFID’s contribution was split into £15,920,000 un-earmarked and £9,943,000 earmarked. It is not possible to say how much of the contributions went specifically to Colombia.

DFID contributes to the European Commission’s humanitarian assistance programme for victims of internal conflict in Colombia through its 18 per cent. contribution to the EC. The EC will be providing €12 million humanitarian aid in 2007, to support people who are displaced as a result of the longstanding internal conflict in Colombia. The funds will be distributed by humanitarian NGOs and the UNHCR.

Departments: Paper

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what percentage of paper used (a) for photocopying and (b) in printed publications by his Department was from recycled sources in each of the last three years. (134059)

All of the A4 size photocopying paper used in the Department for International Development in the last three years was of 100 per cent. recycled content. In 2004-05 and until approximately midway into 2005-06 a very small proportion (less than 0.5 per cent. of our total paper) of virgin A3 size paper was used. In the later part of 2005-06 that too became 100 per cent. recycled.

DFID does not hold the data regarding paper for printed publications centrally, and due to disproportionate cost we cannot supply this information. However, DFID routinely requires that the designers and printers under contract to produce DFID publications source paper that has a minimum of 75 per cent. recycled content.

Departments: Public Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what the cost was of establishing his Department. (134184)

When established, the Department for International Development took over the functions, staff and premises of the Overseas Development Administration. There was no cost to public funds associated with this transfer of functions. To establish detailed figures for other set up costs such as changes in stationery and additional ministerial offices would involve disproportionate costs but these would not have been significant. The running costs outturn for DFID in 1997-98 was 2.4 per cent. lower than the outturn for 1996-97.

Nigeria: Overseas Aid

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what additional aid he plans to make available for the Independent Electoral Commission in Nigeria to deal with the additional workload since the election in that country. (134523)

It is too early to make any significant decision on how DFID’s programme in Nigeria should be adjusted in response to the elections. Due to the problems encountered, additional elections were being held in many parts of the country on 28 April. Currently all sides are reflecting upon the electoral process and the results as these are returned.

However, we are also reviewing our support for the electoral process, including our support to Independent Nigeria Electoral Commission (INEC). DFID provided £2.5 million of support to a Joint Donor Basket Fund managed by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The other donors are the European Union and Canadian CIDA. The majority of the joint funding was notionally allocated to INEC. But INEC has consistently turned down donor offers of technical support, so spending has been lower than anticipated.

Given the events of the last three weeks, the UNDP are now doing a stock-take on our joint support to INEC. We are expecting proposals early this week on how we can best wrap-up our existing programme of support for INEC. After this, there will also be a review of lessons and a priority for the coming few months will be to reach a consensus in Nigeria on how best INEC can be supported in future. In addition, we will be undertaking joint analysis on the wider aspects of political governance which need to be addressed in order for the 2011 elections to be an improvement on those of 2007.

Palestinians: Sanctions

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what assessment he has made of the impact of banking sanctions on conditions of life in the Palestinian territories; and if he will make a statement. (134526)

Since Hamas formed a Palestinian Government in March 2006, international banks dealing with the Palestinian Authority (PA) have risked litigation under US anti-terrorism laws. One result of this has been that the PA’s single treasury account has been frozen. This has undermined important progress made over recent years to improve public financial accountability and control.

Although this situation has made it harder to transfer money to the PA, the PA has been able to continue spending the limited funds it has available. DFID and other donors have also continued and increased aid to help meet the basic needs of Palestinians through other channels. For example, European Union (community and member states) aid is estimated to have increased by 27 per cent. in 2007, compared with 2006. This has partially offset the impact on Palestinian livelihoods of Israel's decision to withhold clearance revenues due to the PA.

DFID is providing technical assistance to the Palestinian Monetary Authority to help ensure that Palestinian banks are able to meet international standards for tackling terrorist financing and money laundering.

Sudan: Dams

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what representations he has made to the government of Sudan on the issue of the Hamdab Dam and what account is taken of its impact on the local Amri people. (134243)

The UK is concerned by the Government of Sudan’s plans to forcibly relocate local communities in the River Nile State by the end of 2007 because of the Hamdab Dam project. Strong protests from local tribes led to an agreement on 1 June 2006, for the state Government and local people to work together to resolve the issue. But the subsequent displacement of 2,200 families without prior warning suggests the Government are reneging on this commitment.

British embassy officials in Khartoum have met representatives of the local people affected by the project. The UN Mission in Sudan’s (UNMIS) Human Rights Unit, on behalf of the international community, is following the situation closely. We raised the plight of those affected by the Hamdab Dam project at a meeting of UNMIS and international partners on 26 April.

Sudan: Overseas Aid

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what humanitarian aid he expects to be provided to the Darfur region of Sudan and eastern Chad in the next six months; and if he will make a statement. (134143)

Total donor intentions are difficult to estimate. In 2006, the UN’s humanitarian appeal for Darfur was 79 per cent. funded, it is expected that similar levels will be forthcoming this year. DFID’s contribution is largely through the Common Humanitarian Fund (CHF), to which we contributed £40 million in 2007, accounting for approximately 60 per cent. of the total. This supports critical needs throughout Sudan. DFID also expect to spend around £15 million over the next year in Darfur through direct grants to humanitarian non-governmental organisations and the International Committee of the Red Cross.

In the case of Chad, the UN’s current annual appeal of £89 million is 40 per cent. funded. The UN is about to supplement this with an additional appeal to support the recent increase in internal displacement. DFID is providing £5 million to humanitarian operations in Chad this year, a rise of £1 million from last year.

We will continue to monitor overall funding for Darfur and Chad and support the UN in lobbying other donors to make substantial and timely contributions.

House of Commons Commission

Departments: Paper

To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what percentage of paper used (a) for photocopying and (b) in printed publications by the House was from recycled sources in each of the last three years. (134041)

Sufficient data to provide the information in the form requested are not available. The House seeks to use the best environmental option for the paper it uses, compatible with the needs of each of its areas of business. I will write to the hon. Member about the specifications of paper provided to Members and used for photocopying and printed publications.

Treasury

Average Earnings

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the average hourly pay was of the (a) (i) lowest and (ii) highest decile, (b) (i) lowest and (ii) highest quartile and (c) highest duo-decile of working age people in employment in each year since 1997. (135064)

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Colin Mowl, dated 30 April 2007:

The National Statistician has been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking what the average hourly pay was of the (a) (i) lowest and (ii) highest decile, (b) (i) lowest and (ii) highest quartile and (c) highest duo-decile of working age people in employment in each year since 1997. I am replying in her absence. (135064)

Average levels of earnings are estimated from the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE), and are provided for all employees on adult rates of pay whose pay for the survey period was not affected by absence. This is the standard definition used for ASHE. The ASHE does not collect information on the self employed and people who do unpaid work.

I attach a table showing the 10th, 25th, 75th, 90th and 95th percentile of Gross Hourly Pay, corresponding to the lowest decile, lowest quartile, highest quartile, highest decile, and highest duo-decile respectively, for all employees, for the years 1997-2006.

The ASHE, carried out in April each year, is the most comprehensive source of earnings information in the United Kingdom. It is a one per cent sample of all employees who are members of pay-as-you-earn (PAYE) schemes.

Gross hourly earnings for all employee1 Jobs—UK

£

Percentile

10th

25th

75th

90th

95th

1997

3.81

4.96

10.64

15.29

18.98

1998

4.00

5.13

11.12

15.96

19.98

1999

4.18

5.36

11.55

16.69

20.96

2000

4.36

5.56

12.03

17.27

21.81

2001

4.53

5.79

12.62

18.27

23.51

2002

4.78

6.00

13.18

19.21

24.72

2003

5.01

6.30

13.68

19.93

25.66

2004 excl.

5.21

6.56

14.28

20.75

26.67

2004 inc.2

5.18

6.50

14.15

20.49

26.15

2005

5.36

6.71

14.71

21.42

27.38

2006

5.57

6.99

15.33

22.29

28.45

1 Employees on adult rates whose pay for the survey pay-period was not affected by absence.

2 In 2004 additional supplementary surveys were introduced to improve the coverage of the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings. Figures are presented both excluding and including the additional surveys for comparison purposes.

Source:

Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, Office for National Statistics

Members: Correspondence

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he expects the chief executive of the Tax Credit Office to reply to the hon. Member for Totnes’ letters of (a) 11 December 2006 and (b) 22 February 2007 on the case of Mr. and Mrs. Langford of Queen Elizabeth Drive, Paignton. (134387)

HMRC have sent a reply to the hon. Member and have apologised to him for the delay in replying.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he expects to reply to the letter from the hon. Member for West Worcestershire of 22 March 2007 (PO Ref: 1/48650/2007). (134607)

Olympic Games: Greater London

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what effect he expects the recent revisions of the Olympics budget to have on plans for Crossrail. (133713)

Crossrail funding and financing issues will be considered further in the context of Sir Michael Lyons’ recommendations and wider spending pressures and priorities. However, the affordability challenge represented by the scheme remains significant.

Revenue and Customs: Publicity

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many click throughs from HM Revenue and Customs online advertisements to the HM Revenue and Customs website have been recorded as part of the online aspect of the “Tax doesn't have to be taxing” campaign since its launch. (133323)

As at end of March 2007 1,151,339 click throughs from HM Revenue and Customs online advertisements to the HM Revenue and Customs website have been recorded as part of the online aspect of the ‘Tax doesn't have to be taxing’ campaign.

Taxation: Members

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many (a) hon. Members, (b) Members of the House of Lords and (c) Members of the European Parliament elected for United Kingdom constituencies are non-resident in the UK for tax purposes. (133346)

No Members of Parliament or Members of the European Parliament are non-resident in the UK for tax purposes. This information is available because the tax affairs of Members of Parliament and Members of the European Parliament are dealt with centrally by HMRC. No such information is collected for Members of the House of Lords whose tax affairs are not dealt with centrally but by local tax offices.

Taxation: Overseas Residence

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) how many people claimed non-domicile tax status in the UK in each of the last five years for which records are available; (133685)

(2) what estimate he has made of the tax forgone by the UK as a consequence of use of the remittance basis by those not domiciled in the UK;

(3) what estimate he has made of the average length of residence in the UK of those claiming non-domicile status;

(4) what methodology is used to estimate the economic benefits to the UK from the retention of the domicile laws on taxation;

(5) what estimates he has made of the economic benefits to the UK from the retention of the domicile laws on taxation;

(6) what investigations have been carried out looking into non-domicile status in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement;

(7) how many people qualified for non-domicile tax treatment in the UK in each of the last five years for which records are available.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the effect on the economy of non-domiciled residence tax status; and if he will make a statement. (133972)

No overall figure for the number of individuals with non-domicile tax status is available.

Estimates of the tax foregone in the UK as a consequence of the use of the remittance basis by those not domiciled in the UK are not routinely made. Information is not held on overseas income and gains that do not give rise to a tax liability in the UK.

Information on the average length of residence is not routinely collected. A small sample survey in 2004 suggested that the majority of non-domiciled individuals who had already left the UK spent no more than five years here.

No estimates have been made of the economic benefits to the UK from the retention of the domicile laws on taxation.

HMRC carry out investigations into non-domiciled status where this may be relevant to a taxpayer's UK tax liability. Such investigations may occur to verify information given to HMRC by individuals completing self-assessment tax returns or making other claims for non-domicile status; as a result of third-party disclosure; or because of the outcome of other HMRC enquiries. No information is available on the number of investigations undertaken.

Information on how many individuals qualify for non-domicile tax treatment in the UK is not available. Some 112,000 individuals indicated non-domicile tax status through their SA returns in 2004-05.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many people (a) employed by and (b) contracted to supply services to HM Treasury claim non-domicile tax treatment. (134096)

HM Revenue and Customs is statutorily debarred from disclosing to third parties information relating to the tax affairs of individuals or public and private sector bodies. Treasury Ministers do not have access to such information.

Taxation: Polygamy

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many people married abroad polygamously and settled in the UK transferred property free of (a) inheritance tax and (b) capital gains tax to their spouses in each year for which figures are available. (134938)

Written Questions

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he will answer question 131290, tabled by the right hon. Member for Birkenhead on 28 March 2007, on the abolition of the 10p tax rate. (135054)

The Treasury hopes to be in a position to answer the right hon. Gentleman’s question shortly.

Culture, Media and Sport

Arts Council of England

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (1) what the investment returns were for the Arts Council of England from National Lottery funding in August 2006; and what they were in the latest period for which figures are available; (134373)

(2) how much funding the Arts Council of England received from the National Lottery in August 2006; and how much it received in the latest period for which figures are available.

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: The following table shows the Arts Council England's income from the National Lottery Distribution Fund in August 2006, in March 2007 and in the entire financial year 2006-07.

Period

Operator -related income to nearest £1,000

Investment income to nearest £1,000

Total to nearest £1,000

August 2006

13,794,000

479,000

14,273,000

March 2007

12,566,000

589,000

13,154,000

Financial year 2006-07

142,861,000

6,396,000

149,257,000

Broadcasting Programmes: Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if she will take steps to improve the provision of children’s programming by public service broadcasters. (134466)

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: In advance of their next scheduled PSB Review, Ofcom have announced they are looking at the future of children’s TV programming in the UK. We await the outcome of that review with interest.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what assessment she has made of the sustainability of the market for the commissioning of quality children's television programmes in the UK; and if she will make a statement. (134481)

The Government recognise that the changing broadcasting environment presents challenges to the ability of commercial public service broadcasters to sustain their programming for children.

We welcome Ofcom's review into children's television, due to be published this autumn, which will include the current state of the children's TV market and the sources of future funding for children's programming.

Broadcasting Programmes: Violence

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what steps the Government plan to take in response to the recent conclusions of Ofcom on violence in television soap operas. (134575)

Parliament has charged the independent regulator, Ofcom, with maintaining broadcasting standards, notably to protect children and to protect the general public from harmful and offensive material. Ofcom sets out the rules and guidance with which broadcasters must comply. Within this framework, it is the broadcasters' job to make judgments about what individual programmes should contain and the time at which they are broadcast. It is a long-standing principle that the Government do not interfere in programming matters. That applies to both scheduling and content. Where there are deliberate, serious or repeated breaches of Ofcom's rules, the regulator may impose statutory sanctions against the broadcaster.

Cultural Heritage: Essex

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what steps are being taken to ensure the preservation of Essex’s cultural heritage; and if she will make a statement. (134578)

English Heritage, the Government’s statutory adviser on heritage matters, is taking a number of steps to ensure the preservation of Essex’s cultural heritage. These include contributing funding towards buildings repairs—such as £400,000 towards repairs to St. Osyth’s Priory—and securing the future of a number of “buildings at risk”, enabling 44 buildings to be removed from their Register. English Heritage is in discussion with agencies involved in the Thames Gateway expansion, the Stansted airport proposed expansion and proposed wind farm off Maldon. English Heritage is responsible for the management of 11 historic sites in Essex, the largest being Audley End House. English Heritage is a member of the East of England Regional Cultural Consortium and chairs the East of England Heritage Environment Forum.

Since 1994 the Heritage Lottery Fund has made close to 500 awards to the county totalling some £33.5 million to preserve cultural heritage.

Departments: Bullying

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many complaints of bullying have been investigated in her Department in the last 12 months; and how many complaints have been upheld. (134833)

There have been no complaints of bullying investigated in the Department in the last 12 months.

Departments: Paper

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what percentage of paper used (a) for photocopying and (b) in printed publications by her Department was from recycled sources in each of the last three years. (134057)

The photocopying paper used by the Department is made from 100 per cent. recycled paper.

All publications have been produced on recycled stock in the last three years.

Digital Switchover Help Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how much her Department spent assisting older and disabled people with the switch to digital television in (a) 2005 and (b) 2006; how much it has spent in 2007; and how much it plans to spend in (i) 2008, (ii) 2009 and (iii) 2010. (134583)

To the present date, a total of £211,000 has been spent on helping vulnerable groups with switchover, this being solely for the Bolton Digital Television Trial in 2005-06. This funding was equally split with the BBC.

All future assistance, which is to be delivered by the Digital Switchover Help Scheme (DSHS), will be provided by the BBC and paid for through the licence fee. We estimate the cost of the scheme at £600 million and this will include assistance provided for the Whitehaven project.

National Lottery: Charities

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what the eligibility criteria are for registered charitable organisations to receive Lottery funding; and which charitable institutions are ineligible. (134492)

Almost any organisation in the United Kingdom, including registered charities, can apply for lottery funding for projects which are not intended primarily for private gain and for which funds would be unlikely to be made available by Government or the devolved administrations.

Under the National Lottery Act 2006, “charitable expenditure”, in relation to expenditure under the charitable, health, education and environment good causes, means expenditure for a charitable, benevolent or philanthropic purpose. Such expenditure is not restricted to registered charities, which are able to benefit from all the lottery good causes.

However, each of the lottery distributing bodies publishes specific eligibility criteria for each of its funding programmes, and applicant organisations must comply with these.

Office of Communications

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how she plans the Ofcom Public Service Publisher service to be funded. (134465)

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: Ofcom published its discussion document into the potential role of the Public Service Publisher (PSP) in January and asked for comments by the end of March. At present they are reviewing those responses with a view to publishing a summary later in 2007.

While we believe the proposal for the PSP has stimulated a healthy debate it remains too early to make a wider Government response to the PSP proposal.

Olympic Games: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how much of the planned World Class Pathway funding for the Beijing Cycle was spent in the 2006-07 financial year, broken down by Olympic sport. (134070)

Between 2006 and 2009, a total of £250.2 million has been budgeted to be invested in the World Class Performance Pathway (WCPP) for Olympic and Paralympic sport, of which a total of £72.5 million was ring fenced to be spent in 2006-07.

The total amount actually invested in Olympic sports for 2006-07 is primarily dependent on the extent to which their World Class Pathway programmes and governance are fit for purpose to receive public funding. The final figures will be available once UK Sport has signed off the audited 2006-07 year-end accounts in June.

Olympic Games: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how she expects Essex to participate in the Cultural Olympiad initiative. (134577)

The Cultural Olympiad has been designed in such a way that creative and cultural organisations at all levels, from the largest national bodies to the smallest community groups, can participate. We are working with the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games to deliver this.

The Nations and Regions are developing plans to maximise the benefit of the London Games to all parts of the UK. In addition, I have recently announced that a network of Regional Creative Programmers in eight of the English Regions is to be established. Their role will contribute to the delivery of cultural events in all the regions in the run-up to and during the 2012 Games.

The Greater London Authority is also developing proposals on how to co-ordinate and deliver a pan-London cultural programme.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what measures are being taken by her Department to ensure that the 2012 Olympic Games is a drug-free event. (134586)

The Department sponsors UK Sport, the UK’s national anti-doping organisation, which is responsible for delivering the UK's national anti-doping programme. In the run-up to the 2012 Games, UK Sport will continue to deliver its anti-doping programme for all Olympic and Paralympic sports.

The chief medical officer at the London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (LOCOG), who was appointed in February, is responsible for the anti-doping programme during the 2012 Games, under delegation from the International Olympic Committee.

In light of this appointment, LOCOG has begun work on arrangements for the testing programme, and will continue to do so in collaboration with UK Sport and DCMS.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport whether Olympic regional creative programmers will be assigned to (a) London, (b) Scotland, (c) Wales and (d) Northern Ireland. (134588)

We are planning cultural events in the run-up to and during the 2012 Games to span the UK. The "Nations and Regions Group" of the London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games is developing plans to maximise the benefits of and engagement in the 2012 Games for their respective nations and regions. Participation in the Cultural Olympiad will be included within these plans.

The network of Creative Programmers being established will cover the eight English regions outside London. Colleagues in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are considering what arrangements would fit their plans to participate in the cultural programme. The Greater London Authority is also developing proposals on how to co-ordinate and deliver a pan-London cultural programme.

Public Libraries: Kent

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what discussions she has had with Kent county council on redundancies in its library service. (134468)

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: None. Staffing of libraries and library authorities is a matter for local authorities to decide, after considering available resources and local priorities, providing it does not affect the authority’s ability to deliver a “comprehensive and efficient” library service to the public as required under the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964.

Public Service Broadcasting

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport whether she plans to bring forward the review of public sector broadcasting in view of the effect of Web 2.0. (134467)

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: Under the Communications Act 2003 Ofcom has the responsibility of periodically reviewing public service television broadcasting. The timing of such reviews is a matter for Ofcom, subject to a requirement that they take place at least once every five years. I understand that Ofcom intends to begin the next review in 2008.

For their part, the Government intend to conduct a review of the case for distributing public funding more widely beyond the BBC before the end of the current licence fee settlement.

Public Service Broadcasting: Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what the regulatory requirements are for each public service broadcaster in relation to children's television; and if she will make a statement. (134169)

Section 264 of the Communications Act 2003 requires Ofcom to regularly review and report on the extent to which public service broadcasters fulfil the purposes of public service television, including the provision (when the services are taken together) of a

“suitable quantity and range of high quality and original programmes for children and young people”.

Public service broadcasters are required to consult Ofcom on proposals for significant changes in their statements of programme policy.

Television: Telephone Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many complaints her Department has received in 2007 on premium-rate telephone competitions. (134582)

To date the Department has received 21 queries regarding the operation of premium rate telephone competitions in 2007. However, complaints about premium rate telephone competitions are a matter for the independent regulators, Ofcom and ICSTIS.

Prime Minister

Berlin Declaration

To ask the Prime Minister what representations he made to his European counterparts during consultations on the Berlin Declaration; if he will place in the Library a copy of such representations; and if he will make a statement. (134301)

I made no formal representations to EU counterparts on the Berlin Declaration. However the normal contacts took place at official level, and I discussed the declaration informally with Chancellor Merkel in the course of normal diplomatic contacts.

The document was written by the German presidency of the EU and presented to leaders shortly before the summit to mark the 50th anniversary of the EU on 25-26 March 2007.

Departments: Paper

To ask the Prime Minister what percentage of paper used (a) for photocopying and (b) in printed publications by his Office was from recycled sources in each of the last three years. (134062)

For these purposes my Office forms part of the Cabinet Office. I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to him by my right hon. Friend the Minister for the Cabinet Office (Hilary Armstrong) on 27 April 2007, Official Report, column 1330W.

Policy Review

To ask the Prime Minister for what reason reference to Trident or its successor was not made in the policy review report “Building on Progress: Britain in the World” published on 17 April. (134205)

“Building on Progress: Britain in the World” draws on the conclusions and discussions of the Ministerial Working Group on Britain in the World, and seminars for junior Ministers conducted as part of the policy review process. It sets out a high-level overview of the broad UK approach to foreign policy since 1997, what the UK has achieved, and what the UK should seek to achieve in the decades to come. It does not aim to cover every issue in detail.

My statement of 4 December 2006, Official Report, columns 21-24, set out in detail the Government’s position on maintaining the UK’s independent nuclear deterrent. The reasons for that decision were further explained in the White Paper “The Future of the United Kingdom’s Nuclear Deterrent” (Cm 6994), published on the same day. The House voted in favour of the Government’s decision on 14 March 2007.

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Arms Control

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment she has made of the recommendations of the United Nations Panel of Experts on the strengthening of the current arms embargo set out in United Nations Security Council Resolution 1591; and what steps she has taken in response to the recommendations. (134945)

We supported the report by the Panel of Experts and its recommendations at the UN Sanctions Committee. It has not yet been transmitted to the UN Security Council (UNSC) nor has it been made public.

At a meeting of the UNSC on 16 April chaired by my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary, she made the case for further sanctions to impose on the Government of Sudan and rebel movements if they fail to abide by their agreements. We are working on a draft UNSC Resolution with other Security Council members to extend the UN arms embargo to the whole of Sudan, in line with the EU arms embargo.

Departments: Oral Questions

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many questions tabled by hon. and right hon. Members to her Department for oral answer have been transferred to other departments since May 2005. (133796)

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) has incomplete records of transfers of oral questions prior to November 2005. Subject to this caveat, our researches show that since May 2005 the FCO has transferred two oral questions.

Saudi Arabia: European Fighter Aircraft

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if she will place in the Library a copy of the Memorandum of Understanding between the UK and Saudi Arabia on the sale of Eurofighter aircraft, signed in December 2005. (132423)

I have been asked to reply.

No. This document is confidential between the two Governments. I am withholding the information as it would, or would be likely to prejudice international relations and harm the interests of the United Kingdom.

Sudan

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions she has had with her counterparts at the EU Council of Ministers on pressing the Government of Sudan (a) to accept and implement the full deployment of a strengthened international force with UN elements in Darfur and along the border with Chad, (b) to monitor the EU arms embargo to Sudan, (c) to help implement the Tripoli Agreement of February 2006 and (d) to extend the Sudan sanctions regime against key individuals. (133489)

At the EU’s General Affairs and External Relations Council on 23 April, which my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary attended, European Foreign Ministers:

recalled that transition to a full African Union/UN hybrid force for Darfur was urgently required;

underlined the urgency of deploying a UN operation in Eastern Chad and the North-East of the Central African Republic;

called on both Sudan and Chad to refrain from further escalation and fully respect their commitments under the 2006 Tripoli Agreement; and

reiterated their readiness to consider further measures against any party which obstructs implementation of the peace agreements for Darfur.

The meeting did not address the EU arms embargo for Sudan, nor are there any plans to amend it.

Sudan: Arms Trade

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment she has made of the evidence presented to the UN Security Council of the transportation of arms and heavy weaponry into Darfur; and what reports on the matter she has received from the British Ambassador to the United Nations. (133877)

We supported the report by the Panel of Experts and its recommendations at the UN Sanctions Committee. It has not yet been transmitted to the UN Security Council nor has it been made public. Our Ambassador to the UN, Sir Emyr Jones Parry, reports developments regularly to my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary. We continue to discuss the case for further sanctions in the UN.

Sudan: International Assistance

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment the Government have made of the impact on humanitarian operations of a no-fly zone over Darfur. (133582)

The situation in Darfur is totally unacceptable. We are pressing our international partners at the UN Security Council (UNSC) to impose further measures on those responsible for the humanitarian crisis through their violations of UNSC Resolutions. Those measures include targeted sanctions against individuals engaged in violence or responsible for authorising it, an extension of the arms embargo to cover the whole of Sudan and measures to allow better monitoring of the illegal use of aircraft in Darfur. Further options remain under consideration, including a UNSC imposition of a no-fly zone. The humanitarian and security implications of such measures will be important considerations.

Sudan: Overseas Aid

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps she is taking to tackle the harassment of humanitarian aid workers by the Sudanese authorities in the Darfur region; and if she will make a statement. (134140)

The UK played a prominent role with the UN and other partners in securing a joint communiqué on 28 March between the UN and the Government of Sudan on humanitarian operations in Darfur. This committed the Government of Sudan to remove bureaucratic impediments and respect the neutrality and independence of agencies involved in the relief effort.

We are pressing the Government of Sudan to implement their commitments in full, including in a letter that my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for International Development sent with five other foreign and development Ministers to the Sudanese Foreign Minister, Lam Akol. My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary repeated this point when she chaired an informal meeting of the UN Security Council on 16 April.

Sudan: Overseas Investment

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if she will make representations to the business community to divest from Sudan on ethical and prudential grounds. (131835)

The restrictive measures adopted by the United Kingdom against Sudan are targeted to apply maximum pressure on those who engage in violence or who are responsible for authorising it. They include a travel ban and assets freeze on individuals who impede the peace process or constitute a threat to stability in the Darfur region. Members of the European Union also decided to go further than the arms embargo imposed by the UN and extend the embargo to the whole of Sudan.

We are now pressing our international partners at the UN Security Council to impose further measures on those responsible for the humanitarian crisis through their violations of UN Security Council Resolutions. Those measures include targeted sanctions against individuals engaged in violence or responsible for authorising it, an asset freeze of commercial entities owned by sanctioned individuals, an extension of the arms embargo to cover the whole of Sudan and measures to allow better monitoring of the illegal use of aircraft in Darfur.

We have not yet considered taking steps to encourage disinvestment from Sudan by British companies. However, if the situation in Darfur does not improve then we will have to consider taking further measures.

Sudan: Peacekeeping Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (1) what steps her Department is taking to reach agreement on the proposed deployment of 20,000 UN peacekeeping troops in the Darfur region of Sudan; and if she will make a statement; (134141)

(2) what steps she is taking to facilitate Stage 3 of the agreement between the government of Sudan and the United Nations; and if she will make a statement.

My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary chaired an informal meeting of the UN Security Council on 16 April which welcomed the Sudanese Government’s agreement to the UN’s Heavy Support Package (the second stage of the agreement between the UN and the Government of Sudan). We are pressing them to agree to a joint African Union (AU)/UN Hybrid Force (the third stage). If the Sudanese Government and rebels do not co-operate, we will move to tougher sanctions.

We have seconded staff into the UN’s Department of Peacekeeping Operations and are supporting their work through political lobbying. We are also a major contributor to the AU Mission in Sudan to keep it going until a joint AU/UN Hybrid Force can be deployed.

Sudan: Peace Negotiations

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations she has (a) made to and (b) received from the Government of Sudan and the Government of South Sudan on the implementation of the revenue sharing commitments made in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement. (134944)

We continue to urge the joint North-South Government of National Unity to implement the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) in full. This was a key message for our intervention at the Sudan Consortium in Khartoum (19-21 March). The UK is also a member of the Assessment and Evaluation Commission (AEC). The AEC is tasked with monitoring CPA implementation and has four sub groups including one focused on wealth sharing. It is the main mechanism for dialogue between the international community and the CPA parties, and meets every month. We also engage both parties regularly on all elements of CPA implementation, including wealth sharing, through our bilateral representation in Khartoum and Juba.

On wealth sharing, I note that over US$1.8 billion of national oil revenue has been transferred to the Government of Southern Sudan. The Fiscal and Financial Monitoring and Allocation Commission has also begun work on determining the division of revenues between the different tiers of government. But much more needs to be done.

Turkey: Ethnic Groups

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent reports she has received on persecution of the Christian minority in Turkey. (134218)

Our Embassy in Ankara reports regularly on human rights, including freedom of religion. We also receive reports from the European Commission and other international organisations. We are aware of attacks affecting Christian minority groups, including the murder of Father Andrea Santoro, a Catholic priest, in February 2006 and the attack on 18 April on three Christians at a publishing house in Malatya.

The Turkish Government have strongly condemned this recent attack and we continue to urge them to keep up momentum in human rights reforms and encourage them to ensure implementation of EU standards is full and consistent. This of course includes freedom of religion.

Uganda: Armed Conflict

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations she has made to the Ugandan authorities on the declaration by President Museveni and his Security Minister Amama Mbabazi that the People’s Redemption Army suspects will only be released if they apply for amnesty; and if she will make a statement. (134235)

We continue to raise our wider concerns about the continued detention of the People’s Redemption Army suspects with the Government of Uganda. Most recently, our High Commissioner in Kampala, with other EU Heads of Mission, made representations about this issue to Foreign Minister Kutesa on 13 April.

We will continue to make representations until the Government of Uganda abides by the constitution and respects the rule of law and independence of the judiciary.

Uganda: Peace Negotiations

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps her Department plans to take to help achieve a successful outcome to the peace talks between the Lord’s Resistance Army and Ugandan Government representatives due to commence in the week beginning 30 April; and if she will make a statement. (134139)

Following interventions by UN Special Envoy Joaquim Chissano, the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) and the Ugandan Government have agreed to resume peace talks in Juba on 26 April. This is encouraging, as is the extension of the cessation of hostilities agreement until the end of June.

We believe that the peace talks in Juba between the LRA and the Government of Uganda offer the best chance for many years to achieve peace. Through the Africa Conflict Prevention Pool the UK has provided £250,000 to a UN fund set up to support the talks process and we have made it clear that we will consider any further requests for assistance very carefully.

Work and Pensions

Departments: Databases

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how often databases within his Department are updated with records of the deaths of individuals; and if he will make a statement. (133003)

The Department for Work and Pensions updated its databases with dates of death approximately 575,000 times in 2006. We have processes in place where we receive death notifications from Registrars on a weekly basis in order to update records. However, many notifications are received from the next of kin in advance of the notification from the Registrars.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what representations his Department has received from data suppression industry experts regarding data suppression technologies; and if he will make a statement. (133004)

The Department's IT group has had no direct engagement with the data suppression industry regarding data suppression technologies.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much his Department spent on database suppression technology in (a) 2003, (b) 2004, (c) 2005 and (d) 2006; and if he will make a statement. (133005)

Departments: Planning

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what steps are taken by his Department to include (a) older people and (b) people with disabilities in strategic planning, policy making and the delivery of the services they use. (132908)

The Government's strategy on older people and ageing, “Opportunity Age” was first published in March 2005. A series of consultation events at which the views and ideas of older people were sought has been invaluable in shaping that strategy.

DWP is piloting a “LinkAge Plus” programme, to test ways of building fully integrated services from health and benefits to leisure and learning. Eight pilots (led by local authorities) have been looking at ways of joining up government for older people. LinkAge Plus puts older people at the heart of the process in identifying effective models that meet their needs and aspirations and involves them in their design.

DWP also sponsors “Better Government for Older People”, comprising approximately 200 voluntary elected members from older people's forums and groups across the UK, which works to reflect the views of older people in policy making.

DWP engages in a range of ongoing involvement activities with disabled people to ensure that their needs and views are reflected in both policy making and service delivery. These are outlined in our disability equality schemes published on 1 December 2006.

The Department sponsored the creation of Equality 2025, a new non-departmental public body providing a mechanism through which disabled people can have direct communication with central Government to influence, at an early stage, Government policies and service delivery that affect disabled people's lives.

We also consult with disabled people to obtain their feedback on new policy proposals or changes as part of our diversity impact assessment process. The findings from such consultation help to influence the final decision on those proposals or changes.

Disability Living Allowance: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many individuals claimed disability living allowance in each London borough for each of the last five years. (133788)

The available information is in the following table.

Disability living allowance cases in payment in London boroughs as at each August, 2002-06

Thousand

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Camden

7.88

8.38

8.67

8.93

9.05

City of London

0.13

0.14

0.14

0.15

0.15

Hackney

9.19

9.49

9.75

9.94

10.04

Hammersmith and Fulham

5.5

5.85

6.11

6.3

6.44

Haringey

8.24

8.63

8.97

9.22

9.41

Islington

8.42

8.92

9.23

9.54

9.72

Kensington and Chelsea

3.79

4.08

4.25

4.42

4.54

Lambeth

8.52

8.96

9.59

10.05

10.39

Lewisham

8.95

9.51

10.05

10.5

10.91

Newham

11.73

12.17

12.34

12.51

12.63

Southwark

9.03

9.62

10.17

10.57

10.94

Tower Hamlets

8.32

8.72

8.99

9.23

9.26

Wandsworth

7.62

8.02

8.35

8.59

8.72

Westminster

6.24

6.83

7.27

7.48

7.75

Barking and Dagenham

8.42

8.82

8.95

8.93

8.84

Barnet

8.21

8.67

9.11

9.43

9.75

Bexley

6.31

6.75

7.14

7.5

7.79

Brent

8.51

9.07

9.5

9.7

9.87

Bromley

7.04

7.47

7.85

8.26

8.54

Croydon

9.12

9.93

10.53

11.11

11.47

Ealing

10.01

10.43

10.72

10.85

11.07

Enfield

8.62

9.11

9.54

9.86

10.13

Greenwich

9.06

9.59

10.2

10.59

10.73

Harrow

5.86

6.24

6.52

6.73

6.92

Havering

7.41

7.85

8.18

8.32

8.47

Hillingdon

7.25

7.6

7.91

8.12

8.32

Hounslow

7.27

7.67

8.01

8.27

8.46

Kingston upon Thames

2.56

2.76

2.95

3.16

3.23

Merton

4.05

4.38

4.62

4.81

4.93

Redbridge

7.82

8.38

8.75

8.97

9.19

Richmond upon Thames

3.2

3.36

3.53

3.63

3.71

Sutton

4.55

4.83

5.16

5.43

5.57

Waltham Forest

8.37

8.76

9

9.19

9.33

Note:

Caseload figures are rounded to the nearest 10; some additional disclosure control has also been applied. Caseload figures are for the number of people in receipt of an allowance, and exclude people with entitlement where the payment has been suspended, for example if they are in hospital.

Source:

DWP Information Directorate: Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study.

Financial Assistance Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what progress has been made towards securing the unclaimed assets of (a) Legal and General and (b) the Prudential for the financial assistance scheme. (132609)

[holding answer on 19 April 2007]: On 28 March John Hutton announced a review to examine whether an alternative treatment of the residual funds in affected pension schemes and other non-public expenditure funding that have not already been allocated, could be used to increase levels of assistance above the 80 per cent. provided by the financial assistance scheme.

The review has started and is being led by Andrew Young, Directing Actuary at the Government Actuary's Department. The review team has already met some key stakeholders and will be contacting others shortly to tell them about the review and to invite their contributions. The review will provide an initial view in the summer and will then report by the end of the year.

Incapacity Benefit: Jobseeker's Allowance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much he estimates will be spent on providing jobseeker’s allowance incapacity benefits for 2007-08. (133563)

Planned expenditure in 2007-08, is £2,546 million for jobseeker’s allowance, £6,428 million for incapacity benefit, and £887 million for severe disablement allowance.

Income Support: Young People

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will give consideration to the Social Security Advisory Committee's Sixth, Seventh and Eighth reports, with particular reference to the recommendation that the full rate of income support should be restored for young people under 25 years of age living away from home; and if he will make a statement. (132838)

Since income support was introduced in 1988, a single person aged 18 to 24 has been paid at a lower rate than single people aged 25 and over. It would be a new initiative rather than a restoration, to pay single customers aged 18 to 24 at the same rate as single customers aged 25 and over. There are no plans to change these rules.

Jobseeker's Allowance: Gloucester

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people were claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance in (a) Cheltenham and (b) all Gloucestershire constituencies in each month since March (i) without seasonal adjustment and (ii) seasonally adjusted. (133351)

The available information is in the following table; March 2007 is the most recent available information. Seasonally adjusted figures are not available at constituency level.

Jobseeker’s allowance claimants in Gloucestershire parliamentary constituencies, without seasonal adjustment: March 2007

Constituency

Claimants

Cheltenham

1,443

Cotswold

523

Forest of Dean

937

Gloucester

1,594

Stroud

731

Tewkesbury

684

Notes:

1. Figures are unrounded.

2. Figures include clerically held cases.

Source:

100 per cent. count of claimants of unemployment-related benefits, Jobcentre Plus Computer Systems.

Maternity Benefits

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much was underpaid in maternity allowances due to (a) customer error and (b) official error in each of the last five years; and how many people were affected. (133911)

New Deal Schemes: Unemployment

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assessment he has made of the impact of the new deal on unemployment; and if he will make a statement. (133457)

[holding answer 23 April 2007]: Since 1997, claimant unemployment has fallen by 708,000 and the number of people on lone parent benefits has fallen by 230,000. We are also spending £5 billion less on unemployment than we did in 1997.

The new deal, which has helped more than 1.7 million people into work since January 1998, has contributed to this success. It has helped reduce long-term claimant unemployment to close to its lowest for 30 years and to significantly reduce long-term youth claimant unemployment.

Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of the size of savings needed to buy an annuity for (a) a single worker and (b) a married couple to ensure a pension income that takes them above pension credit eligibility. (135061)

The size of annuity required to take an individual above pension credit eligibility depends on a wide range of factors. This includes the type of annuity an individual purchases, their entitlement to basic and addition state pension, and any additional needs they may have which affect pension credit entitlement. It also depends on whether their pension will take them above pension credit eligibility at the point of retirement or over their expected lifetime and whether their pension will take them above guarantee credit only or savings credit.

Under our proposed pension reforms someone retiring in 2053 with a good contribution record (through working or caring) could expect to receive around £135 per week from the state pension on retirement (in 2005-06 earnings terms). This is—for a single person—above the end point of pension credit. Couples with good contribution records will be substantially above the end point for pension credit.

Only those on the guarantee credit alone will face pound for pound withdrawal on private saving. Someone with around 25 years of working or caring retiring in 2050 will have accrued enough state pension to bring them above the guarantee credit only. Our analysis suggests that in 2050 around 6 per cent. of all pensioners will be eligible for guarantee credit only, and only around one in 50 pensioners will retire directly onto guarantee credit only. In addition, those with small amounts of savings will be able to take them as a lump sum under the trivial commutation rules.

Remploy: Business Interests

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what outside business interests directors at Remploy are permitted to pursue; and if he will make a statement. (133534)

Remploy’s Executive Directors are permitted to pursue outside business interests, providing this does not impact on their role at Remploy and they have the permission of the Company. Non-Executive Directors are free to pursue outside business interests.

Remploy: Management

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many layers of management operate at the St. Helens Remploy site. (133537)

There are three layers of management at the St. Helens Remploy site. These are the General Manager, Operations Manager and Local Remploy Manager.

Incapacity Benefit

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what percentage of incapacity benefit claimants returned to work within (a) two weeks, (b) one month, (c) three months and (d) six months in the most recent period for which figures are available. (132831)

The information is not available in the format requested.

The latest Destination of Benefit Leavers Survey (2004) suggests 50 per cent. of incapacity benefit leavers returned to work of 16 hours or more in that year, higher than reported in the previous year.

The Destination of Benefit Leavers Survey also provides the following breakdown for those leaving incapacity benefits for work, by benefit duration.

IB claim duration (weeks)

Percentage returned to/starting work of 16 hours or more

0-13

67

13-26

61

26-52

46

52+

40

Notes:

1. Incapacity benefits include, contributory incapacity benefit and income support for the sick and disabled.

2. ‘Leavers’ excludes those leaving as a result of death.

Source:

DWP Destination of Benefit Leavers 2004. Research Report no. 244

Social Security Benefits

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the name of each benefit administered by his Department was in each year since 1996-97; what the level of each benefit was in each year; what the total amount paid in each benefit was in each year; what proportion of the total paid in each year was means-tested; and what the cost of administering each payment was in each year. (132839)

The name of each benefit administered by the Department, and the total amount paid in each benefit in each year, since 1996-97, can be found in benefit expenditure tables on the Department for Work and Pensions website at the following address:

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd4/medium_term.asp.

The benefit names are listed in column A of table 3. Annual amounts paid in each benefit are listed from 1996-97 (column H) to 2007-08 (column S). All figures are outturn, apart from 2006-07, which are estimated outturn, and 2007-08, which are planned expenditure. The figures in table 3 are in cash terms and are rounded to the nearest million pounds. Expenditure at 2007-08 prices can be found in table 4, which is laid out exactly the same as table 3.

There are notes attached to each internet table, but the following particular points should be noted:

1. Responsibility for child benefit, guardians allowance and child's special allowance transferred to Inland Revenue, now HM Revenue and Customs, in April 2003.

2. Responsibility for war pensions transferred to the Veterans Agency in 2002-03.

The amount paid for each benefit in each year, in other words weekly benefit rates, are published each year in Statutory Instruments, as Social Security Benefits Up-rating Orders, which will be in the House of Commons Library and can be found on the Office for Public Sector Information website at the following addresses:

1996: SI 559 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1996/Uksi_19960599_en_l.htm

1997: SI 543 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1997/19970543.htm

1998: SI 470 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1998/19980470.htm

1999: SI 341 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1999/19990341.htm

2000: SI 440 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2000/20000440.htm

2001: SI 207 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2001/20010207.htm

2002: SI 668 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2002/20020668.htm

2003: SI 526 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2003/20030526.htm

2004: SI 552 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2004/20040552.htm

2005: SI 522 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2005/20050522.htm

2006: SI 645 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2006/20060645.htm

2007: SI 688 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/20070688.htm

Some other useful information about weekly benefit rates can be found on pages 50 to 74 of the 2005 edition of the Abstract of Statistics for Benefits, National Insurance Contributions, and Indices of Prices and Earnings, and on pages 101 to 191 of the 2004 edition of Work and Pensions Statistics (now discontinued) which can be located at the following internet addresses:

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd1/abstract/Abstract2005.pdf

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd1/workandpens/2004/lndividual_Benefit_Statistics.pdf

The proportion of the total paid in each year that was means-tested is shown in the following table:

Means tested proportion of total benefit paid in each year (percentage)

1996-97

35.2

1997-98

33.9

1998-99

32.7

1999-2000

31.0

2000-01

29.3

2001-02

29.0

2002-03

29.3

2003-04

31.5

2004-05

31.5

2005-06

30.8

2006-07

31.1

2007-08

30.7

These percentages have been calculated using information in benefit expenditure table 3.

Full information about the cost of administering each payment in each year is not available.

From 1999-2000 the cost of administration is accounted for separately within the departmental expenditure limit (DEL) and the information requested on administration costs at benefit level is not available.

Information on administrative costs prior to the creation of DWP in 2001 is not comparable with administrative costs now due to considerable organisational change.

The available information, which is at benefit level, is in the following tables:

£ million

Cash (i)

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

Contributory benefits (paid from the National Insurance Fund)

Retirement Pension

303

312

314

Widow's benefits

15

12

8

Unemployment Benefit (ii)

95

Incapacity Benefit

365

294

375

Jobseeker's Allowance (contribution based)

57

63

51

Non-contributory benefits (paid from voted money)

War Pensions

42

39

32

Attendance Allowance

82

76

75

Disability Living Allowance

147

164

119

Severe Disablement Allowance

36

42

43

Income Support

717

581

excluding the unemployed—12 months

877

unemployed only—6 months

209

Jobseeker's Allowance (income based)

315

452

330

Child Benefit and One Parent Benefit

133

133

125

Family Credit

66

59

72

Social Fund

180

161

215

Invalid Care Allowance

30

27

34

Housing Benefit (iii)

312

328

350

Council Tax Benefit (iii)

182

180

175

£ million

2007-08 prices (i)

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

Contributory benefits (paid from the National Insurance Fund)

Retirement Pension

396

396

389

Widow's benefits

20

15

10

Unemployment Benefit (ii)

124

Incapacity Benefit

477

373

464

Jobseeker's Allowance (contribution based)

74

80

63

Non-contributory benefits (paid from voted money)

War Pensions

55

50

40

Attendance Allowance

107

97

93

Disability Living Allowance

192

208

147

Severe Disablement Allowance

47

53

53

Income Support

911

720

excluding the unemployed—12 months

1,146

unemployed only—6 months

273

Jobseeker's Allowance (income based)

412

574

409

Child Benefit and One Parent Benefit

174

169

155

Family Credit

86

75

89

Social Fund

235

204

266

Invalid Care Allowance

39

34

42

Housing Benefit (iii)

408

417

433

Council Tax Benefit (iii)

238

229

217

Notes:

1. Costs shown represent the total estimated costs to Government, Department of Social Security and other Departments of administering Social Security benefits.

2. Includes the cost of administering national insurance credits for clients who do not receive any social security benefit.

3. Costs quoted are local authority costs. Central Government costs are allocated to income support.

4. Figures have been rounded to the nearest million pounds.

5. The information has been taken from the 1998, 1999 and 2000 Department for Social Security departmental reports. The information requested is only available to 1998-99.

6. Figures have been converted to 2007-08 prices using GDP deflators issued by HM Treasury following the Budget report 2007.

Social Security Benefits: Disabled

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many and what proportion of lone parents whose youngest child is over the age of 11 years are receiving (a) income support and (b) incapacity benefit; and how many and what proportion of each group are (i) carers for a disabled child and (ii) have a disability themselves. (130380)

The available information is in the following table.

Lone parents with youngest child over 11: Great Britain

Claiming

Number

Proportion of all LPs with youngest child over 11 (Percentage)

Number

Proportion (Percentage)

Income support

108,950

19.1

Caring for a child with a disability

38,000

35.1

Report disability themselves

65,000

60.2

Incapacity benefits

24,370

4.3

Caring for a child with a disability

1

1

Report disability themselves

24,370

100

1 Family and Children's Study sample size too small to identify. Notes:1. Reporting a disability and caring for a disabled child are not mutually exclusive categories—those who are both caring for a disabled child and report a disability themselves (21.6 per cent. of those with youngest child over 11 claiming income support) will appear in both categories. 2. The income support figures do not include any claimants on incapacity benefit. However, some of those included in the incapacity benefit may also receive income support. Source: DWP administrative data; Family and Children's study 2004, Labour Force Survey 2006 Q2.

Social Security Benefits: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people claimed (a) income support, (b) job seeker’s allowance, (c) housing benefit, (d) council tax benefit, (e) carer’s allowance and (f) incapacity benefit in each London borough in each of the last five years. (132112)

State Retirement Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of the total volume of deficit repair contributions made in each of the last five years. (132502)

The PPF collects information on deficit reduction payments made by schemes in order to reduce the amount of risk-based levy they are liable to pay. As the PPF has only been in operation since April 2005, information on such deficit reduction payments is not available for each of the last five years.

Such information as is available was published in the Purple Book (http://www.ppf.gov.uk/the_purple_book _ppf-tpr.pdf)

"Schemes in the sample had certified approximately £9.8bn of special contributions to reduce deficits by 7 April 2006. These contributions were certified to the Pension Protection Fund for the purpose of enabling a more up-to-date assessment to be made of the scheme funding position, with the extra contributions increasing the scheme assets and so reducing the risk-based levy."

Figures for deficit reduction payments in 2006-07 are not yet available.

Home Department

Ministry of Defence Police

10. To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Defence on the effect of the reduction in Ministry of Defence Police numbers on civilian police forces. (134282)

I have had no representations from any police force about the impact of reductions in the number of MOD police officers.

It is a matter for discussion between the local force, police authority and the MOD police.

I have regular meetings with ministerial colleagues at the Ministry of Defence and will discuss this issue at my next meeting.

Police: Street Patrols

11. To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent estimate he has made of the proportion of time police officers spend patrolling the streets. (134283)

63 per cent. of officer time was spent on frontline activities in 2005-06. 14 per cent. of officer time was spent on patrol.

Other frontline activities not captured by the definition of “patrol” include arrests, dealing with incidents, gathering intelligence, responding to 999 calls, carrying out searches, dealing with informants, and interviewing suspects, victims and witnesses.

Licensing Laws

12. To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the new licensing laws on reducing crime in (a) West Lancashire and (b) England and Wales. (134284)

We are conducting a full evaluation of the impact of the Licensing Act 2003 on crime and disorder. This is ongoing and is due to be published towards the end of 2007. A separate monitoring exercise is looking at the impact of the Act on police recorded violent crime and criminal damage. Interim results from this exercise were published in July 2006. They show that there had been no change in the overall volume or timing of offences following the introduction of the Act. No separate arrangements have been made to monitor the impact of the Act in West Lancashire.

Police Training Days

13. To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent estimate he has made of the cost of training days in the police work force owing to the introduction of new legislation. (134285)

The consequences of any new legislation in terms of training is generally a matter for police forces to determine, although some police training is delivered nationally through what is now the National Policing Improvement Agency.

In terms of force costs, these will vary dependent upon the local impact of legislation, and each force making an assessment of its own training needs and requirements. It is also important to note that law based or legislative police training (except when an officer joins the police service) remains a relatively small proportion of their training needs.

Accordingly, policing costs for new training as a result of legislation will vary from police area to area. There are therefore no estimates of the cost of police training specifically as a consequence of new legislation.

Immigration: Public Services

15. To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the impact of levels of immigration on public services in the last 12 months; and what forecast he has made of the likely effects in the next 12 months. (134287)

17. To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent assessment he has made of (a) the impact of levels of immigration on public services in the past 12 months and (b) the likely effect in the next 12 months. (134289)

To date there has not been a formal system for assessing the impact of immigration on public services but individual Government Departments have mechanisms to receive information about overall pressures on such services. Last summer we conducted a cross-Government review of the impacts of migration. On 28 March we announced the establishment of a new forum to provide an opportunity for regular and organised dialogue with interested parties focusing on the impacts of migration. This will be chaired by Home Office and Local Government Ministers.

Rural Policing: North Yorkshire

19. To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on rural policing in north Yorkshire. (134291)

The Government are committed to ensuring that all communities have access to, and are served by a responsive, locally accountable and citizen focused police service. The deployment of that resource is an operational matter for the chief constable.

I am aware that the acting deputy chief constable in north Yorkshire is consulting with all chief constables and commissioners to investigate variations in working practices relating to isolated and rural communities. The hon. Member may therefore wish to speak to the force about this matter directly.

Anti-terrorism Strategy

20. To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent discussions he has had with officials and other Ministers on the co-ordination of anti-terrorism strategy. (134292)

I regularly discuss the co-ordination of the Government's strategy on counter terrorism with officials and ministerial colleagues, including at a weekly security meeting which I chair.

Correspondence

21. To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what average length of time the director general of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate took to reply to hon. Members' letters in the past 12 months. (134293)

For the 12-month period up to and including December 2006 the average waiting time for responses to letters from hon. Members to the Border and Immigration Agency was 24 days in respect of correspondence on immigration matters.

Departmental Restructuring

22. To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what discussions he has had with the Chancellor of the Exchequer on departmental restructuring. (134294)

The decision to refocus the Home Office so that it is better able to respond to the changes in the world at both a global and local level, where we have moved from static communities and a static world to a highly mobile world was one that was taken by the Prime Minister and discussed at Cabinet.

Identity Cards

23. To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent assessment he has made of the potential contribution of identity cards to the tackling of identity fraud. (134295)

Our plans for a National Identity Scheme, including the introduction of identity cards, will not only enable people to prove their identity easily, quickly and simply but will also provide a highly secure means of protecting their identity. This will have a significant impact upon identity fraud, which costs the United Kingdom economy at least £1.7 billion each year.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the cost has been of the identity card scheme. (134288)

Some £58 million has been spent on the identity cards scheme since the start of the 2003-04 financial year and up to the end of September 2006.

DNA Database

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the national DNA database. (134364)

24. To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the national DNA database; and if he will make a statement. (134296)

The National DNA database is a key police intelligence tool which contributes to the efficiency of crime detection. It has a key role to play in contributing to detection outcomes, eliminating the innocent from inquiries, focusing the direction of inquiries resulting in savings in police time and in building public confidence that elusive offenders may be detected and brought to justice.

Violent Crime

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent assessment he has made of the effectiveness of measures to combat violent crime. (134297)

The Government are taking forward a full range of work to tackle violent crime. This has included: introducing new legislation; providing intensive support to practitioners in those areas which face the biggest challenges in terms of violent crime; and developing a range of measures to reduce sexual and domestic violence re-offending.

We consider that a 34 per cent. fall in BCS violent crime since 1997 is testament to the effectiveness of these measures, and we will continue to focus our efforts to bring down the level of these serious crimes even further.

Antisocial Behaviour

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans his Department has to hold another Antisocial Behaviour Day Count. (134937)

There are no current plans to hold another national Antisocial Behaviour Day Count.

Since the 2003 day count, a number of new ways of measuring performance have been introduced. The focus is now on the perception of antisocial behaviour rather than specific incident counting, which is subject to severe under-reporting. As such these measures supersede the need for a specific “one day” antisocial behaviour incident count.

The perception of antisocial behaviour is monitored nationally through the British Crime Survey (BCS) and at a local level through the Local Government User Satisfaction Survey (LGUSS). In addition a survey of Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships (CDRPs) is conducted on a quarterly basis to monitor, at a local level, the uptake and use of a number of tools and powers used to tackle antisocial behaviour, such as acceptable behaviour contracts (ABCs), demotion orders and housing injunctions.

Crime: Macclesfield

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the recorded crime figures for the Macclesfield borough in the Cheshire Constabulary East Division were in (a) 2005-06 and (b) 2006-07 according to the classifications (i) all crime, (ii) burglary of a dwelling, (iii) violent crime, (iv) vehicle crime and (v) criminal damage; and what assessment he has made of the trends in these statistics. (134403)

The statistics are not available in the form requested as data for 2006-07 will not be available until 19 July 2007. Statistics for 2005-06 are in the following table together with the percentage change from the previous year.

Offences recorded in the Macclesfield crime and disorder reduction partnership area

2005-06

Percentage change from previous year

Total crime

11,719

1.4

Burglary in a dwelling

679

-6.7

Violent crime

2,319

16.6

Vehicle crime

1,750

14.5

Criminal damage

2,692

-8.2

Electronic Tags

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many offenders reoffended whilst wearing electronic tags in each year since their introduction; and if he will make a statement. (110531)

The following table sets out the number of offenders, who have been cautioned, convicted or are awaiting prosecution for offences while they were subject to the home detention curfew scheme, as currently notified to the National Offender Management Service.

The totals for 2005-06 have been updated following a cross-checking of reoffending data from the Police National Computer for the third and fourth quarters of 2005 and the first quarter of 2006.

Some of those awaiting prosecution will be found not guilty or charges will be dropped.

Information is not collected on further convictions for offenders subject to other electronic monitoring schemes apart from home detention curfew.

Number of offenders cautioned, convicted or awaiting prosecution for an offence committed while they were subject to the home detention curfew scheme

Number

1999

71

1999-2000

294

2000-01

244

2001-02

208

2002-03

584

2003-04

1,298

2004-05

1,311

2005-06

1,214

Extradition

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what criteria his Department uses in assessing extradition requests from other countries. (132660)

[holding answer 18 April 2007]: The requirements for extradition requests are set out in the Extradition Act 2003. Extradition requests from EU member states are assessed wholly by the courts using criteria set out in Part one of the Act.

Extradition requests from other parts of the world are considered in part by the courts using criteria set out in Part two of the Act. The Secretary of State’s role in considering extradition requests is limited to requests made under Part two of the Act; and in those requests, he must decide whether he is prohibited from ordering a person’s extradition under criteria set out at sections 94-96 of the Act. These relate to the death penalty, speciality and possible earlier extradition from a third country.

Fixed Penalties

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many penalty notices for disorder were issued for (a) theft, (b) criminal damage, (c) being drunk and disorderly and (d) dropping litter in each month since November 2004. (130816)

Penalty notices for disorder (PNDs) rolled-out to all police forces in England and Wales under the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001. Under the scheme, the police can issue a fixed penalty of £50 or £80 for a specified range of disorder offences including shop theft (under £200) and criminal damage (under £500).

Data on the number of PNDs (penalty notice for disorder) issued for the specified offence for each month since November 2004 are provided in the following tables. The data for 2006 are provisional. Finalised data for 2006 will be available this summer.

The figures show that the PND has been an increasingly useful disposal option for the police in tackling low-level antisocial behaviour, providing them with a simple, non-bureaucratic financial punishment for first-time offenders.

Number of penalty notices for disorder issued to persons aged 16 and over for selected offences by month, November 2004 to December 20061,2

Offence

Total

January

February

March

April

May

June

Drunk and disorderly

2004

6,154

2005

37,038

2,842

2,732

2,779

2,860

2,927

2,551

20061

42,308

3,101

3,090

3,073

3,696

3,515

3,503

Criminal Damage (under £500)

2004

1,103

2005

12,168

813

754

786

906

982

990

20061

19,654

1,505

1,377

1,312

1,562

1,584

1,710

Theft (retail under £200)

2004

2,018

2005

21,997

1,286

1,309

1,603

1,806

1,822

1,728

20061

37,463

2,608

2,655

2,983

2,843

2,957

2,999

Depositing and leaving litter

2004

49

2005

737

32

47

56

54

75

73

20061

1,125

77

89

69

109

118

124

Offence

July

August

September

October

November

December

Drunk and disorderly

2004

2,504

3,650

2005

3,092

2,969

2,822

3,400

3,296

4,768

20061

3,481

3,441

3,545

3,753

3,304

4,806

Criminal Damage (under £500)

2004

452

651

2005

1,158

1,158

1,052

1,193

1,093

1,283

20061

1,746

1,919

1,806

1,778

1,579

1,776

Theft (retail under £200)

2004

872

1,146

2005

1,700

1,746

2,005

2,048

2,432

2,512

20061

2,722

3,148

3,346

3,498

3,873

3,831

Depositing and leaving litter

2004

19

30

2005

60

53

63

71

66

87

20061

87

77

108

104

87

76

1 Data on PNDs issued in 2006 are unpublished and provisional

2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

Homicide: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many recorded murders there were in each London borough in each of the last 10 years; and what percentage of those recorded murders led to a conviction in each year, broken down by borough. (133512)

The statistics are not available in the form requested. The recorded crime statistics relate to homicide offences and convictions data relates to offenders. In addition, recorded crime data are published on a financial year basis and conviction data are published on a calendar year basis. For these reasons, the two data sources are therefore not directly comparable.

Figures for the number of offences recorded and the number of convictions are in the following tables. Recorded crime data at borough level are only available from 2000-01.

Table 1: Recorded offences of homicide by London borough—2000-01 to 2005-06

Borough

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

Barking and Dagenham

4

2

3

4

8

4

Barnet

8

4

5

2

5

4

Bexley

3

2

2

0

2

3

Brent

6

12

6

10

18

10

Bromley

7

3

4

2

3

2

Camden

7

10

16

1

8

22

City of Westminster

8

8

9

6

5

8

Croydon

3

7

6

12

10

10

Ealing

8

9

9

6

8

8

Enfield

2

6

6

6

12

6

Greenwich

4

5

4

12

8

5

Hackney

14

14

6

20

9

7

Hammersmith and Fulham

6

10

6

4

4

2

Haringey

9

7

17

12

10

5

Harrow

3

3

0

3

0

2

Havering

5

3

1

6

0

2

Hillingdon

2

2

5

6

2

3

Hounslow

5

6

2

7

6

5

Islington

11

9

3

5

7

2

Kensington and Chelsea

4

3

3

1

9

4

Kingston upon Thames

1

3

0

1

2

2

Lambeth

13

17

15

12

10

7

Lewisham

6

7

5

9

5

9

Merton

3

2

3

2

0

3

Newham

11

7

14

15

10

13

Redbridge

5

3

5

8

4

6

Richmond upon Thames

2

0

2

3

3

2

Southwark

15

11

11

13

9

7

Sutton

3

2

3

1

1

0

Tower Hamlets

4

9

11

11

8

0

Waltham Forest

4

5

7

9

5

7

Wandsworth

3

11

6

2

4

5

Total

189

202

195

211

195

175

Number of defendants found guilty at all courts of homicide, broken down by London court area, 1996 to 20051,2,3

London court Area

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

City of London

Guildhall Justice Rooms

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

Inner London Courts

Bow Street

2

1

4

3

5

8

3

3

3

5

4

Camberwell Green/Tower Bridge

8

14

5

10

7

10

12

15

13

16

16

Greenwich and Woolwich

2

4

10

14

5

7

3

9

8

6

11

Highbury Corner

15

16

14

22

13

7

13

8

7

9

6

Horseferry Road

2

3

3

3

2

4

1

6

2

6

9

Marylebone

4

3

4

1

3

5

South Western

2

2

1

8

6

3

4

4

4

Thames

2

1

1

5

11

12

7

7

15

13

West London

2

2

6

4

4

4

2

6

8

2

10

Inner London Juvenile Courts

1

6

1

Total - Inner London

38

51

50

59

52

62

49

58

52

59

73

Outer London Boroughs

Barking and Dagenham

6

1

6

3

4

1

1

Barnet

1

1

3

4

1

2

6

7

3

4

Bexley

1

1

1

2

1

4

Brent

6

4

4

4

1

15

7

6

7

11

8

Bromley

2

2

1

3

1

4

1

2

Croydon

3

1

1

1

1

2

8

4

9

6

Ealing

3

3

3

4

2

8

5

3

4

5

6

Enfield

3

4

1

5

4

3

7

4

9

9

Haringey

5

3

3

4

3

2

11

5

7

7

4

Harrow

1

2

1

2

1

2

Havering

1

2

1

2

3

4

Hillingdon

3

2

5

2

1

1

1

2

8

2

Hounslow

2

3

7

6

7

1

1

3

1

7

Kingston-upon-Thames

4

1

2

1

4

4

1

Merton

4

2

2

1

1

2

6

1

4

1

Newham

2

3

2

5

6

4

4

8

3

11

12

Redbridge

2

1

-

1

2

-

1

-

3

3

9

Richmond upon Thames

1

2

3

1

1

1

1

Sutton

1

1

1

2

3

Waltham Forest

3

3

1

5

1

7

3

4

4

3

Total - Outer London

45

26

33

52

41

52

63

62

58

91

77

Total

83

77

83

111

93

114

112

120

110

151

150

1 These data are on the principal offence basis.

2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

3 The data covers: murder, manslaughter and infanticide—provided to be consistent with recorded crime data provided for this PQ.

Source:

Office for Criminal Justice Reform – Ref IOS 210-07.

Ministerial Meetings

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when Ministers or officials from his Department last met the chairs of local police committees. (116681)

My right hon. Friend, the Home Secretary (John Reid) and I met with chairs of police authorities and with chief constables most recently at a seminar on police reform on 2 November 2006. I also attended the conference of the Association of Police Authorities, at which many chairs of police authorities were present, on 30 November 2006. I meet the APA on regular occasions and meet the chairs of local committees throughout the year in line with my duties as Police Minister.

Norwich Prison

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the health and safety of prisoners being held in A wing at HMP Norwich; what assessment he has made of the adequacy of staffing levels at HMP Norwich; and if he will make a statement. (134245)

HMP/YOI Norwich has risk assessments and safe systems of work in place for all areas of the prison and for all activities. Part of A wing reopened in late January 2007 following up-to-date Health and Safety risk assessments and safe systems of work been put in place. Prior to occupation having the cells were inspected personally by the Governor and confirmed as being appropriate and suitable cellular accommodation by the Eastern Area Manager. The remaining poor repair cellular accommodation in A wing is not occupied. Safe staffing levels have been agreed for the operation of the prison and for the daily operation of the reopened A wing facility four additional staff have been added to the complement.

Passports: Lost Property

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many and what percentage of passports dispatched by courier did not arrive at their destination in the last period for which the figures are available; what those figures were in the last comparable period prior to the contract being awarded to couriers; if he will ensure that security of delivery is the paramount consideration in re-awarding the contract; and if he will make a statement. (133141)

For the 12 month period ending January 2007, 728 passports have been confirmed as lost while in the delivery process. This equates to 0.011 per cent. of passports delivered. Secure Delivery commenced in February 2004, and the last period of data available for the previous Royal Mail arrangements is for 2003. In that year, 3,593 passports were recorded as lost in the delivery process, which equates to 0.065 per cent.

Secure Delivery has therefore seen a reduction of over 80 per cent. in the number of passports lost in this way.

Security of delivery is the paramount consideration in the current arrangements, and all deliveries can be tracked from collection to the point of delivery. The new contract will balance the need to provide a secure delivery service with the need to provide value for money and high levels of customer service.

Police Custody

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer of 20 February 2007, Official Report, column 1227W, on police custody, on how many occasions Operation Safeguard was used in England and Wales between 1 January 2006 and 1 April 2007. (134069)

Operation Safeguard was reactivated on 22 January 2007. Between 22 January and 30 March 2007, Operation Safeguard was used on 9,380 occasions. This does not correspond precisely to a number of prisoners: one occasion means one prisoner night in a police cell.

Police: Broadcasting Programmes

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether police forces in England and Wales charge television companies for video footage used in television programmes. (133920)

Charging the media for police-held video material is a matter for decision by individual chief officers. The Association of Chief Police Officers have produced guidance notes on this subject entitled “Media Advisory Group Guidelines Parts 1-11”.

Police: Cheshire

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) police officers and (b) police community support officers were recruited in Cheshire in each year since 1997. (134033)

The available data, for 2002-03 onwards, is in the following tables.

Police officer recruits1 to Cheshire police from 2002-03 to 2005-062 (FTE)3

Cheshire

2002-03

141

2003-04

153

2004-05

105

2005-06

121

1 Recruits included those officers joining as standard direct recruits and those who were previously special constables. This excludes police officers on transfers from other forces and those rejoining.

2 Financial year runs 1 April to 31 March inclusive. Data are not available prior to 2002-03.

3 Full-time equivalent figures that have been rounded to the nearest whole number. Because of rounding, there may be an apparent discrepancy between totals and the sums of the constituent items.

Police community support officer recruits1 to Cheshire police from 2002-03 to 2005-062 (FTE)3Cheshire2002-0322003-04262004-05122005-0614 1 Recruits included those officers joining as standard direct recruits and those who were previously special constables. This excludes police community support officers on transfers from other forces and those rejoining.2 Financial year runs 1 April to 31 March inclusive. Data are not available prior to 2002-03.3 Full-time equivalent figures that have been rounded to the nearest whole number. Because of rounding, there may be an apparent discrepancy between totals and the sums of the constituent items.

Police: County Durham

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many police officers were transferred from non-operational duties to front line operations in the community in County Durham in each year since 2002; and how many civilian staff filled these non-operational posts. (134439)

The information requested is not collected centrally. The deployment of police officers and police staff is an operational matter for individual chief constables.

Police: Bullying

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many reported incidents of bullying there were in police forces in England and Wales in each of the last 10 years, broken down by police force area. (133271)

Police: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many former police officers rejoined the police force in England and Wales in each year since 1997, broken down by police force area. (133273)

The available data are from 2002-03 onwards and are in the following table.

Police officer retainers (FTE)1 by force from 2002-03 to 2005-062

2002-03

2003-043

2004-05

2005-06

Avon and Somerset

1

0

0

0

Bedfordshire

5

2

0

3

Cambridgeshire

8

9

8

5

Cheshire

2

1

2

0

Cleveland

1

0

1

2

Cumbria

4

1

0

1

Derbyshire

19

0

13

20

Devon and Cornwall

6

0

1

11

Dorset

0

1

1

7

Durham

0

2

0

0

Dyfed-Powys

0

n/a

0

3

Essex

9

30

4

7

Gloucestershire

4

0

0

5

Greater Manchester

0

17

35

29

Gwent

0

1

13

17

Hampshire

6

3

19

14

Hertfordshire

5

4

2

1

Humberside

6

3

3

32

Kent

1

10

7

15

Lancashire

5

1

1

0

Leicestershire

5

2

10

11

Lincolnshire

5

1

2

4

London, City of

1

2

2

1

Merseyside

0

0

1

0

Metropolitan Police

46

69

113

100

Norfolk

8

0

0

5

Northamptonshire

1

0

0

1

Northumbria

0

8

1

10

North Wales

0

0

1

8

North Yorkshire

1

n/a

0

0

Nottinghamshire

0

1

1

20

South Wales

22

4

0

32

South Yorkshire

0

6

11

18

Staffordshire

7

13

15

2

Suffolk

1

0

0

10

Surrey

9

4

4

8

Sussex

4

8

2

11

Thames Valley

8

7

18

18

Warwickshire

1

4

1

3

West Mercia

2

3

14

11

West Midlands

23

15

13

9

West Yorkshire

4

3

9

17

Wiltshire

2

5

1

3

1 This table contains full-time equivalent figures that have been rounded to the nearest whole number. Because of rounding, there may be an apparent discrepancy between totals and the sums of the constituent items.

2 Financial year runs 1 April to 31 March inclusive.

3 Data are not available for Dyfed-Powys and North Yorkshire.

Police: Parental Leave

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many police officers took (a) maternity leave, (b) paternity leave and (c) a career break in each year since 1997. (133272)

The available data is in the table; they are from the 2002-03 financial year onwards and relate to long-term absences as at the end of each financial year.

Police officers (FTE)1 on long-term absence as at 31 March 2003 to 31 March 20062

As at 31 March each year

Maternity leave

Paternity leave

Career break

20033

291

7

626

2004

642

27

750

20054

617

41

867

2006

713

31

1,124

1 Full-time equivalent figures that have been rounded to the nearest whole number. Because of rounding these figures may not match published totals.

2 Data are available from 2002-03 onwards.

3 Data are not available for Dyfed-Powys, Nottinghamshire, Sussex and West Midlands.

4 Data are not available for North Wales.

Police: Telephone Services

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department which police authorities did not meet the target time for handling calls from the public under the National Call Handling Standards for (a) urgent and (b) non-urgent calls in the most recent year for which figures are available. (121205)

[holding answer 12 February 2007]: The target times for answering emergency and non-emergency calls under the National Call Handling Standards is not yet collated nationally, as NCHS has not been fully implemented in all forces.

The HMIC Baseline Assessment in 2006 examined implementation of NCHS and its relationship with the Quality of Service Agreement under 1C Customer Service and Accessibility. The HMIC’s 2007-08 assessment regime will also address this area of work.

Prisoners Release: Acquittals

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what financial and other assistance is available to those who are released from prison having been on remand and are found to be innocent. (133870)

Remand prisoners are eligible for all induction and resettlement programmes within the prisons and are able to access practical support to effectively help them re-integrate back into the community.

Currently there is no financial scheme that covers such prisoners. However, remand prisoners are entitled to travel warrants and in some cases to housing benefit and council tax benefit and mortgage interest for a limited time.

Prisoners: Compensation

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many claims for compensation were made by prisoners at each of Her Majesty’s Prisons and Young Offender Institutions in each year between 1997 and 2007; on what basis each claim was made; how many of these claims were settled out of court; how many were otherwise successful; what the total sum was of compensation paid; and what action was taken by the prison authorities in each case to prevent similar claims in the future. (134450)

Prisoners: Foreigners

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many foreign prisoners there were in prisons in England and Wales on 31 March, broken down by country of origin. (132929)

Information as at the end of February 2007 on the numbers of prisoners by recorded nationality in all prison establishments in England and Wales is given in the following table. This is the latest date for which the information is currently available.

These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems, which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.

Prison population in prison establishments in England and Wales showing all nationalities, February 2007

Number

Total Prison population

79,581

Unrecorded

879

Total other

less than 50

Aruba

less than 50

United Arab Emirates

less than 50

Afghanistan

96

Anguilla

less than 50

Albania

135

Armenia

less than 50

Netherlands Antilles

less than 50

Angola

90

Argentina

less than 50

Austria

less than 50

Australia

less than 50

Azerbaijan

less than 50

Bosnia-Herzegovina

less than 50

Barbados

less than 50

Bangladesh

171

Belgium

less than 50

Bulgaria

less than 50

Bahrain

less than 50

Burundi

less than 50

Dahomey (Benin)

less than 50

Bermuda

less than 50

Bolivia

less than 50

Brazil

83

Bahamas

less than 50

Burma

less than 50

Botswana

less than 50

Belize

less than 50

Canada

less than 50

Croatia

less than 50

Ivory Coast

less than 50

Central African Republic

less than 50

Congo

112

Switzerland

less than 50

Chile

less than 50

Cameroon, United Republic

less than 50

China

279

Columbia

119

Costa Rica

less than 50

Czech Republic

less than 50

Cuba

less than 50

Cape Verde

less than 50

Cyprus

57

Germany

143

Denmark

less than 50

Dominica

less than 50

Dominican Republic

less than 50

Algeria

198

Estonia

less than 50

Ecuador

less than 50

Egypt

less than 50

Spain

74

Ethiopia

53

French Guyana

less than 50

Finland

less than 50

Fiji

less than 50

France

162

French Southern Territories

less than 50

Grenada

less than 50

Georgia

less than 50

Ghana

211

Gibraltar

less than 50

Gambia

less than 50

Guinea

less than 50

Equatorial Guinea

less than 50

Greece

less than 50

Guatemala

less than 50

Guinea/Bissau

less than 50

Guyana

less than 50

Hong Kong

less than 50

Honduras

less than 50

Haiti

less than 50

Hungary

less than 50

Iran

205

Indonesia

less than 50

Israel

less than 50

India

306

Iraq

288

Irish Republic

666

Italy

113

Jamaica

1,490

Jordan

less than 50

Kazakhstan

less than 50

Kenya

60

Kiribati

less than 50

Kyrgystan

less than 50

Korea Republic of (Sth)

less than 50

Kuwait

less than 50

Lebanon

less than 50

St. Lucia

less than 50

Sri Lanka

167

Lithuania

188

Liberia

less than 50

Latvia

less than 50

Libya

less than 50

Morocco

less than 50

Moldova

less than 50

Macedonia

less than 50

Serbia and Montenegro

92

Mali

less than 50

Mongolia

less than 50

Mauritania

less than 50

Montserrat

less than 50

Malta

less than 50

Mauritius

less than 50

Malawi

less than 50

Mexico

less than 50

Malaysia

less than 50

Mozambique

less than 50

Namibia

less than 50

Niger

less than 50

Nigeria

1,070

Netherlands

147

Norway

less than 50

New Zealand

less than 50

Oman

less than 50

Panama

less than 50

Peru

less than 50

Papua New Guinea

less than 50

Philippines

less than 50

Pakistan

444

Poland

290

Portugal

193

Paraguay

less than 50

Qatar

less than 50

Romania

144

Rwanda

less than 50

Saudi Arabia

less than 50

Seychelles

less than 50

Sudan

less than 50

Sweden

less than 50

Slovakia

less than 50

Singapore

less than 50

St. Christopher and Nevis

less than 50

Sierre Leone

82

Senegal

less than 50

Somalia

348

Slovenia

less than 50

Surinam

less than 50

Russia

116

El Salvador

less than 50

St Kitts and Nevis

less than 50

Syrian Arab Republic

less than 50

Swaziland

less than 50

Chad

less than 50

Togo

less than 50

Thailand

less than 50

Tunisia

less than 50

East Timor (Portuguese)

less than 50

Turkey

228

Trinidad and Tobago

97

Tanzania

less than 50

Uganda

86

United Kingdom

67,459

United States of America

99

Uzbekistan

less than 50

St. Vincent ad The Grenadines

less than 50

Venezuela

less than 50

Vietnam

381

Western Sahara

less than 50

Yemen, Republic of

less than 50

South Africa

201

Zambia

less than 50

Congo, Democratic Republic

less than 50

Zimbabwe

189

Note:

For reasons of confidentiality and data integrity numbers under 50 are not shown.

Prisons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer of 9 January 2007, Official Report, columns 546-7W, on prisons, when he expects to make publicly available the results of the trial of the body orifice scanner in the high security prison. (134074)

There are no plans to make public the results of this trial. It would not be in the public interest to publicise details of Prison Service security mechanisms.

Prisons: Childbirth

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many women gave birth while serving a prison sentence in each of the last five years for which figures are available. (133977)

The Prison Service has only routinely kept this information centrally since April 2005. Figures prior to this date are not available.

The following figures show, for the last two years, the numbers of women who gave birth while serving the custodial part of a sentence of imprisonment:

1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006: 106

1 April 2006 to 31 March 2007: 98

Prisons: Rural Areas

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he has assessed the merits of providing short-term temporary cells in rural areas. (134372)

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: The National Offender Management Service has investigated a wide range of potential temporary accommodation to increase capacity. Part of the 8,000 place capacity-building programme includes ready built modular accommodation which has an expected life span of 10 to 25 years. The early stages of the programme are using land on existing prison sites. Some of these are in rural areas.

Rape: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many recorded rapes there were in each London borough in each of the last 10 years; and what percentage of those recorded rapes led to a conviction in each year, broken down by borough. (133510)

The statistics are not available in the form requested. Recorded rape statistics relate to offences and convictions data relate to offenders. In addition, recorded crime data are published on a financial year basis and conviction data are published on a calendar year basis. For these reasons, the two data sources are not directly comparable.

Figures for the number of offences recorded and the number of convictions are provided in the following tables. Recorded crime data at borough level are available only from 2000-01.

Table 1: Recorded offences of rape by London borough 2000-01 and 2001-02

Borough

2000-01

2001-02

Barking and Dagenham

48

53

Barnet

48

62

Bexley

32

53

Brent

119

105

Bromley

48

62

Camden

91

96

City of Westminster

114

112

Croydon

102

109

Ealing

98

93

Enfield

58

76

Greenwich

80

94

Hackney

103

108

Hammersmith and Fulham

66

57

Haringey

95

118

Harrow

34

38

Havering

19

35

Hillingdon

31

55

Hounslow

48

71

Islington

72

109

Kensington and Chelsea

34

32

Kingston upon Thames

27

37

Lambeth

163

172

Lewisham

105

115

Merton

19

38

Newham

115

93

Redbridge

38

63

Richmond upon Thames

28

24

Southwark

115

129

Sutton

20

22

Tower Hamlets

78

76

Waltham Forest

74

85

Wandsworth

65

97

Total

2,187

2,489

Table 2: Recorded offences of rape by London borough 2002-03to 2005-06

Borough

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

Barking and Dagenham

70

56

74

66

Barnet

60

84

84

70

Bexley

43

31

48

36

Brent

87

129

99

97

Bromley

70

47

57

54

Camden

71

52

68

67

City of Westminster

131

119

113

102

Croydon

99

72

90

113

Ealing

107

96

77

101

Enfield

91

83

74

72

Greenwich

119

116

99

120

Hackney

101

118

132

136

Hammersmith and Fulham

74

96

63

56

Haringey

113

91

99

110

Harrow

29

45

50

37

Havering

32

51

30

49

Hillingdon

57

58

52

45

Hounslow

70

65

75

71

Islington

135

97

93

76

Kensington and Chelsea

43

42

36

42

Kingston upon Thames

50

45

37

42

Lambeth

166

126

146

139

Lewisham

150

132

96

85

Merton

44

39

45

39

Newham

152

142

151

112

Redbridge

69

54

72

46

Richmond upon Thames

22

14

22

20

Southwark

141

163

126

126

Sutton

30

27

31

39

Tower Hamlets

105

96

85

85

Waltham Forest

87

87

55

84

Wandsworth

109

96

64

61

Total

2,727

2,569

2,443

2,398

Note: The National Crime Recording standard was introduced in April 2002. Figures for earlier years are therefore not directly comparable.

Table 3: Number of defendants found guilty at all courts of rape, broken down by London Court Area, 1996 to 20051,2,3

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

City of London

Guildhall Justice Rooms

1

Inner London Courts

Bow Street

1

3

1

4

1

2

1

3

Camberwell Green/Tower Bridge

16

8

7

15

12

11

11

16

12

14

Greenwich and Woolwich

4

4

8

6

8

10

10

11

13

7

Highbury Corner

11

8

9

3

7

5

5

9

19

10

Horseferry Road

5

2

3

2

4

3

2

5

1

3

Marylebone

1

2

3

2

3

3

South western

3

6

1

3

1

6

4

5

3

4

Thames

2

2

7

7

10

8

3

5

11

West London

1

5

2

1

4

4

5

7

4

7

Inner London Juvenile Courts

9

3

Total—Inner London

41

46

38

39

46

52

45

56

57

56

Outer London

Barking and Dagenham

1

1

2

1

2

2

5

2

8

2

Barnet

1

3

3

4

1

4

3

4

2

1

Bexley

3

3

2

2

2

1

4

Brent

3

5

5

2

6

2

6

1

2

9

Bromley

2

2

2

2

1

5

Croydon

5

2

3

6

4

7

5

6

8

Ealing

3

6

7

6

4

3

2

2

6

Enfield

1

3

2

1

1

4

1

10

4

2

Haringey

6

1

5

7

5

3

5

6

3

5

Harrow

2

1

3

3

1

3

2

1

2

Havering

1

1

1

2

1

Hillingdon

2

2

3

1

4

2

1

Hounslow

5

1

1

1

2

3

4

7

Kingston-upon-Thames

1

1

1

4

1

2

3

Merton

1

2

3

2

1

2

Newham

6

7

5

4

1

8

15

2

4

Redbridge

1

3

3

3

4

1

2

Richmond upon Thames

2

1

1

3

1

2

2

Sutton

1

4

2

2

Waltham Forest

4

4

2

2

5

4

5

5

7

3

Total—Outer London

46

41

54

31

42

31

66

68

60

63

Total

87

87

92

70

88

83

112

124

117

119

1 These data are on the principal offence basis. 2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. 3 Rape includes rape of a female and rape of a male.

Sentencing

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what extra resources and planning were made for the introduction of indeterminate public protection sentences; and if he will make a statement. (133785)

The Criminal Justice Act 2003 created new indeterminate public protection sentences aimed specifically at sexual and violent offenders. This was part of an overall rebalancing of the system to maximise public protection:

the Government believe serious and dangerous offenders should be kept in prison for as long as is necessary to protect the public;

other offenders should normally be punished in the community.

No additional resources were allocated specifically for IPP but correctional services budgets take into account the overall work load demanded of them, including all the measures in the 2003 Act.

Terrorism

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he plans to introduce new terrorism legislation to Parliament this Session; and if he will make a statement. (133649)

World War II: Education

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much was spent in supporting education on the Holocaust in (a) schools and (b) the community in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. (132401)

I have been asked to reply.

Data on expenditure by schools to support education on the Holocaust are not collected centrally. However a grant of £3 million, administered by the Department, has been made to subsidise the Holocaust Educational Trust’s “Lessons from Auschwitz” programme between April 2006 and March 2008. The programme aims to achieve the participation of two post-16 students from every school and Sixth form college in visits to Auschwitz-Birkenau. Other Departments also fund activities relating to Holocaust education.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Biofuels

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will estimate the carbon savings resulting from the growing of biofuels on land which had previously been (a) used to grow food crops and (b) set aside or unused; and if he will make a statement. (132773)

The Government have funded a number of studies to consider environmental impacts and benefits of biofuels, including Life Cycle Assessments. Carbon savings vary depending on a number of factors including the crop used and the way it is cultivated, previous land use, the transport used and the processing and conversion process.

A DEFRA-funded project is currently under way to develop a software tool to address the main environmental issues associated with bio-energy technologies. This will include a quantitative assessment of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission savings by using a land use reference system which includes “set-aside” and “food cropland”. The tool will be available later this year.

The Government are also developing a comprehensive carbon and sustainability reporting scheme under the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation. This will require suppliers wishing to claim credits for their biofuels to provide information on the GHG saving and wider sustainability characteristics of those fuels. The GHG calculation methodology includes previous land use in addition to emissions from cultivation, transportation and processing and conversion.

Cattle: Disease Control

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many animals were slaughtered under the cull of animals owned by Mr. Davis Dobbin of Backford, Chester, broken down by (a) sex and (b) age group; what the cost was of the cull for his Department; how many animals appeared not to be correctly identified; and how many appeared to have irregularities in their passports. (134086)

[holding answer 26 April 2007]: I cannot comment on this case as there are criminal proceedings pending.

Departments: Smith Institute

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many times he has (a) spoken at and (b) attended meetings at the Smith Institute in an official capacity; and how many of those occasions were in the last 12 months in each case. (133764)

In the last 12 months, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State (David Miliband) has visited the Smith Institute in an official capacity on 17 October 2006 and 7 February 2007.

Domestic Wastes: Norfolk

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer of 16 April 2007, Official Report, columns 77-80W, on domestic waste, on what basis the borough council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk was included in the list. (134608)

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: In a recent survey commissioned by the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP), the response received from King’s Lynn and West Norfolk borough council indicated that the council operates an alternate week refuse and recycling service.

However, on clarification, it appears the council misunderstood the use of the terms “alternate weekly collection”.

WRAP are currently reviewing their list of authorities providing an alternate weekly collection service and will be publishing an amended version shortly.

Fishing Vessels

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what share of total UK fishing quotas he allocated to the under-10 metre fleet in (a) the UK and (b) England in each year since 1997. (133883)

In 2006, 2 per cent. of the UK’s opening quota was allocated to the 10 metre and under fleet. However, such an analysis is misleading because the total UK quota includes quota for stocks which are of no interest to inshore vessels, such as deep sea species and stocks fished in external waters. In addition, many of these vessels catch types of fish, such as crabs and scallops, which are not subject to quotas.

Fishing opportunities for the 10 metre and under fleet are boosted by Fishing Administrations acquiring additional quota in-year for their use.

Results for earlier years could be provided only at disproportionate costs.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many over-10 metre vessels from (a) producer organisations and (b) the non-sector have moved into the under-10 metre fleet in each year since 1997. (133884)

An over 10 metre vessel cannot join the 10 metre and under fleet. However, owners of over 10 metre vessels are able to sell their quota and licence and acquire a licence in the 10 metre and under fleet. Central data systems record all changes in ownership as a result of a sale or an agreed transfer. While these systems record details of the owners of vessels and licences, they are not designed to allow the details of the vessels and licences held by any individual owner to be tracked over time. As such, information on the movement of owners from over 10 metre vessels to 10 metre and under vessels could be produced only at a disproportionate cost.

Flood Control: EC Grants and Loans

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will make a statement on the implication of the new funding arrangements for the European Rural Development Fund on (a) flood defences overall, (b) the Thirsk Flood Alleviation Scheme and (c) coastal flood defences in Filey. (134016)

Flood defence expenditure is generally not covered by the Rural Development Programme for England. Funding for flood defence is a matter for the Environment Agency (EA).

The Rural Development Programme for England provides funding to safeguard and enhance our rural environment and to foster competitive and sustainable businesses and thriving rural communities. There is some limited funding available under the Environmental Stewardship Scheme for the creation of wildlife habitats which may also have flood risk management benefits.

It is not possible for the EA to apply for funding from this programme to fund flood defence works at Thirsk and Filey.

Food: Waste Disposal

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when he expects to decide on whether to prosecute Bernard Matthews for lapses of bio-security concerning the storage of food waste. (134538)

A Food Standards Agency investigation examined the possibility that food waste at the Bernard Matthews cutting plant at Holton may have been stored inappropriately.

The investigation concluded there was no evidence of any offences under the Animal By-Products Regulations 2005, for which DEFRA is the enforcement authority.

The Food Standards Agency also considered whether there was sufficient evidence to justify a prosecution under the Animal By-Products (Identification) Regulations 1995 or the Food Hygiene (England) Regulations 2006, for which the agency is the enforcement authority. The agency concluded there was insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction and decided not to proceed to a prosecution in this case.

Home Energy Efficiency Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) when his Department plans to complete its review of the Warm Front grant maxima for England; (134609)

(2) when the latest Warm Front price review undertaken by White, Young and Green is expected to be published.

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: These reviews are still continuing, and I expect to make further statements by the end of June.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many households in each parliamentary constituency were assisted through the Warm Front scheme in each year since the scheme was introduced. (134611)

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: Since its launch in June 2000, the Warm Front scheme has assisted over 1.2 million households in fuel poverty in England, mainly through energy efficiency measures, including loft and cavity wall insulation.

Data on the number of households assisted in each constituency in each year since the start of the scheme could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. However, MPs can now access a personal micro site on the Eaga Group website that will update them on work undertaken in their area. The website also provides other information and resources to help MPs to raise awareness of the Warm Front scheme in their constituencies.

Housing: Carbon Emissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many zero carbon homes he expects to be built in each year for which his Department has made such an estimate. (133769)

I have been asked to reply.

The Government do not collect this information centrally, but are aware of a small number of low and zero carbon homes currently built. The Code for Sustainable Homes and the draft Planning Policy Statement on Climate Change are designed to cut carbon emissions from new homes and promote low and zero carbon homes in the period up to 2016, when the Government have proposed that all new homes will be zero carbon. We would therefore expect an increasing proportion of new housing built over the next 10 years to be zero carbon, but no exact estimates have been made.

Lighting

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will consider exempting people with light sensitivity conditions from proposals to phase out the sale of incandescent light bulbs. (133879)

The Government are exploring how various groups may be affected by the phasing out of inefficient lightbulbs. It is important that any unintended impacts are mitigated.

Plastics: Packaging

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the environmental impact of plastic bag use in supermarkets. (134040)

The Environment Agency is carrying out a study of the environmental impacts of a range of carrier bags, including disposable plastic carrier bags and bio-degradable alternatives. The study will look at their entire life-cycle from raw material extraction through to product manufacture. To date, the evidence suggests there would be no benefit in reducing the number of plastic bags in use if this encourages the use of alternative packaging or materials which are even more environmentally damaging.

The National Non-Food Crops Centre has also started work on Life Cycle Analysis comparisons of plastic, oxodegradable and biodegradable bags. The centre has established a Thematic Working Group on Biopolymers, which aims to promote and encourage the expansion of such materials. Biopolymers are derived from renewable sources and can be used in a range of products, including bags, which helps to develop a sustainable supply chain.

DEFRA continues to work closely with the devolved administrations, the Waste and Resources Action Programme, the British Retail Consortium, retailers and the plastics industry to develop a voluntary approach for reducing the environmental impact of carrier bags. Earlier this year, UK retailers agreed to reduce the overall environmental impact of their carrier bags by 25 per cent. by the end of 2008.

Polytunnels: Planning Permission

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what his policy is on planning procedures for (a) existing and (b) new agricultural polytunnels; what discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government on such procedures; and if he will make a statement. (131019)

While Communities and Local Government (CLG) has overall responsibility for planning policy in England, the interpretation of planning regulations is a matter for the local planning authority in the first instance.

Polytunnels are important to the horticultural sector for helping growers to supply a wide range of high-quality produce over a full season. Crops, especially soft fruit such as strawberries, need to be protected and polytunnels provide an ideal, cost-effective solution. Growing fruit in polytunnels is in line with DEFRA’s Strategy for Sustainable Farming and Food in that it meets demand for home grown fruit all the year round. However, extensive polytunnels can have a significant impact on the landscape and the local planning authority must consider each case on its merits.

I have had no discussions with the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government on the question of planning policy for polytunnels, but DEFRA and CLG officials work closely together on this issue.

Power Stations: Carbon Emissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what change there has been in carbon dioxide emissions from power generation since the programmed closure of older nuclear power stations began; how the power generated by those stations has been replaced; and what net change there has been in carbon dioxide emissions as a result of the replacement generation. (132110)

I have been asked to reply.

Since 2000, six older nuclear power stations with a total generation capacity of approximately 2 GW have closed. Total carbon dioxide emissions from the power generation sector over the same period (2000-05) have increased by nearly 5 million tonnes of carbon. The level of carbon emissions from the power sector depends on a number of factors, including the level of demand and the wholesale electricity price, which is underpinned by the price of fossil fuels and the price of carbon in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.

The impact of the closure of nuclear power stations on emissions will depend on the assumptions about the stations which have replaced them. If the capacity has been replaced by generation technologies that emit carbon (such as gas-fired generation, for example) then it is likely that the closure of the older nuclear capacity will have contributed to the rise in carbon emissions from the power sector between 2000 and 2005.

River Don: Pollution

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what measures have been implemented in order to prevent further overflow pollution similar to that experienced in 2006 in the River Don; (133989)

(2) what the most recent assessment is of the water quality of the River Don in the area which was affected by the overflow pollution in 2006.

The Environment Agency (EA) has been working with Yorkshire Water to agree changes to operations at Blackburn Meadows Sewage Treatment Works (Sheffield), within the terms of its permit. Improved maintenance and changes to procedure should improve the ability of the sewage works to deal with future storm events.

A study is under way into the main storm overflow from Aldwarke Sewage Treatment Works (Rotherham). Any improvements the study identifies will be completed by March 2010.

The EA is starting discussions with Yorkshire Water to agree a study into the impact of the combined storm overflows from the middle section of the River Don from Sheffield through Rotherham to Doncaster. The study will establish in detail what happens when summer storms occur and what can be done to improve the infrastructure in the future. In the EA’s Periodic Review submission to the Water Services Regulation Authority (Ofwat) it will recommend that this study be carried out.

The Environment Agency's preliminary assessment of 2006 chemical water quality data shows that the River Don between Blackburn Meadows Sewage Works and Rotherham Centre (2.5 km) has deteriorated from "fairly good quality" to "fair quality" since 2005. While the river has deteriorated slightly in quality, it has not failed the long-term water quality objective set for the river.

The River Don below Blackburn Meadows Sewage Works failed the Freshwater Fisheries Directive in 2005 and has, provisionally, failed in 2006. It is believed that the sewage treatment works caused this failure. Consequently, the EA is also recommending to Ofwat that a detailed study concerning this failure be carried out.

Seas and Oceans: Environment Protection

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what discussions he has had with representatives of the devolved administrations on measures to maintain and improve the marine environment. (132113)

We have been working with the Scottish Executive and the Welsh Assembly in recent months on our Marine Bill White Paper. I hope that that cooperation and commitment to the marine environment will remain after the Scottish elections in May.

Sewage: Floods

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many incidents of sewer flooding where raw sewage has contaminated homes and property occurred in (a) England, (b) each English region and (c) each county in the last three years. (134376)

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: Ofwat is the economic regulator of the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales. It collects information from companies on internal and external sewer flooding each year by water and sewerage company area.

The following table sets out the number of incidents of internal and external sewer flooding from public sewerage systems by company area in the last three years. The internal and external incidents include flooding to both household and non-household properties. Ofwat does not collect information showing the split of incidents between household and non-household properties. External incidents also include highway flooding incidents and incidents to open public spaces.

2003-042004-052005-06

Company

Internal

External

Internal

External

Internal

External

Anglian Water

127

3,137

172

2,621

188

1,178

Northumbrian

407

1,895

277

2,085

1,347

3,894

Severn Trent (who also supply parts of Wales)

686

4,912

808

3,285

725

3,477

South West

123

155

144

1,118

187

1,323

Southern

263

5,102

308

5,019

444

5,237

Thames

505

3,106

1,340

3,745

1,103

3,778

United Utilities

822

3,355

1,661

2,943

734

4,056

Wessex

93

3,309

137

3,244

96

1,643

Yorkshire

439

418

469

1,064

306

888

Total

3,465

25,389

5,316

25,124

5,130

25,474

Telephone Use: Mrs. Beckett

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the cost to public funds was of the telephone use of the right hon. Member for Derby, South from her official residence in Admiralty House in (a) 2004-05 and (b) 2005-06. (113985)

Costs incurred by Ministers in the course of official business are borne by the department. The cost to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs for telephone services in Admiralty House for my right hon. Friend the Member for Derby, South (Margaret Beckett) between March 2004 and February 2006 was £1,412.51. The bulk of these costs were for the service charges associated with the telephone services provided.

Television: Carbon Emissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment his Department has made of the effect on carbon dioxide emissions of plasma television screens. (132227)

The Government's Market Transformation Programme (MTP) estimates that in 2005 63 million television (TV) sets were being used in UK homes. Approximately 90 per cent. of these were the traditional cathode ray tube (CRT) type and approximately 10 per cent. were flat screen plasma or LCD types. By 2010, we estimate that the total number of TVs will rise to around 67 million sets, of which approximately 50 per cent. will be CRTs, and approximately 40 per cent. LCD and plasma. The remaining 10 per cent. will be made up of rear-projection and yet-to-emerge technologies such as organic light-emitting diode and field-emission diode screens.

Our assessment, based on current trends, is that the energy consumed by all TVs could increase from around 10 Terra Watt Hours (TWh) of electricity (roughly 1.1 million tonnes of carbon) in 2005 to over 15 TWh of electricity (1.7 million tonnes of carbon) in 2010. Most of this potential increase in emissions is accounted for by a predicted significant rise in the average electricity consumption of each unit. This will be caused by the trend for consumers purchasing TVs with larger screens, including both plasma and LCD technologies, replacing their older and smaller CRT models, and a small increase in the total TV viewing hours and standby usage by households.

However, we believe there is a potential, through actions by manufacturers and retailers to bring forward and to promote TVs that are more energy efficient, so that the projected 2010 electricity consumption can be reduced by around 10 per cent.

The issue of increasing emissions from new generation television sets and the potential impact of emerging technologies was assessed in a report published for DEFRA in June 2005, entitled “An Assessment of Emerging Innovative Energy Efficient Technologies as part of the Energy Efficiency Innovation Review”.

Waste Management

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many civil servants of each grade are employed by (a) the Waste Management Division and (b) the Waste Strategy Division within his Department. (132270)

The number of staff employed in the two divisions as at 31 March 2007 was as follows:

Grade equivalent

Waste management

Waste strategy

AO

5

3

EO

7

9

HEO

12

9

SEO

1

4

Grade 7

6

5

Grade 6

0

1

SCS

1

1

Total

32

32

The numbers shown are a headcount and exclude inwardly seconded staff.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the job title is of each staff position in (a) the Waste Management Division and (b) the Waste Strategy Division within his Department. (132272)

Job titles for staff in DEFRA’s Waste Management and Strategy Divisions are as follows:

Waste Management Division

SCS Deputy Director, Head of Waste Management Division

Personal Secretary to the Head of Division

Grade 7 Head of Waste Management Licensing Unit

2 HEO Policy advisers

EO Policy adviser

AO Administrator

Grade 7 Head of Fly-tipping Strategy Unit

SEO Policy adviser

2 HEO Policy advisers

EO Policy adviser

AO Administrator

Seconded Policy adviser

Grade 7 Head of Hazardous Waste Unit

SEO Policy adviser (post vacant)

2 HEO Policy advisers

2 EO Policy advisers

AO Administrator

Seconded Policy adviser

Grade 7 Head of Producer Responsibility Unit

4 HEO Policy advisers

2 EO Policy advisers

AO Administrator

Grade 7 Head of Waste Framework Directive Unit

2 HEO Policy advisers (1 post vacant)

EO Policy adviser

Grade 7 Head of Permitting Development Unit

HEO Policy adviser

Waste Strategy Division

SCS Head of Waste Strategy Division

Personal Secretary to Head of Division

G7 Team leader of Waste Policy and Processes Branch

3 HEO Policy advisers

2 EO Policy advisers

Grade 6 Team Leader of Waste Strategy review Branch

SEO Project Manager and Policy adviser

HEO Policy adviser

2 EO Policy advisers

Grade 7 Head of Local Authority Waste Funding and Governance Branch

2 SEO Policy advisers

HEO (D) Policy adviser

EO Policy adviser

AO Administrator

Grade 7 Head of Waste Evidence Branch

SPTO, Senior Waste Technical Officer

HEO Programme Officer (Vacant)

EO Project Officer (Vacant)

AO Administrator (shared between Waste Evidence Branch and Waste

Resources Branch)

Grade 7, Head of Waste and Resources Branch

HEO (D), Policy adviser

HEO Policy adviser

EO Policy adviser

Grade 7 Team Leader and Policy adviser, Local Authority Waste Performance

Branch

2 HEO Policy advisers

3 EO Policy advisers

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many scientists are employed by the (a) Waste Management Division and (b) Waste Strategy Division within his Department. (132274)

Official scientific capacity in these divisions resides in DEFRA’s Waste Evidence Branch (formerly the Waste Research Team).

There are two scientists in this team:

(i) the Head of Branch, a Grade 7, a Chartered Environmentalist and Waste Management Professional who holds a joint Honours BSc in Chemistry and Applied Zoology

(ii) the Senior Waste Technical Officer, a Senior Professional Technical Officer (SPTO), who holds a Master’s in Geography focusing on environment.

DEFRA is also supported on waste-related scientific and technical issues by the Environment Agency.

Wood: China

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what procedures are in place to ensure that hardwood products imported from China are not made from timber that has been illegally felled in Indonesia; and if he will make a statement; (134165)

(2) what steps he is taking to ensure that imports of hardwood finished goods to the EU from China have been sourced from sustainable timber in (a) the Far East and (b) other countries.

Currently there is no measure available to the UK to stop forest products being imported on the grounds that some or all of the timber used in their manufacture may not have met the laws of a third country.

However, the Indonesian Government have banned the export of round logs and most categories of rough sawn timber, as a measure to help tackle illegal logging within their borders.

To introduce more effective measures, Indonesia is negotiating a Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) with the EU. This would allow member states to ban imports of timber directly from Indonesia which have not been licensed by the Indonesian Government as legally harvested. The UK Department for International Development is actively supporting these negotiations. This Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT) agreement, as currently proposed, would not stop Indonesian companies from exporting timber to third party countries, such as China, that do not have FLEGT type agreements with Indonesia. While the Indonesian Government have indicated that they intend to require timber exports to all countries to meet the same legality requirements as those specified under the VPA, the potential for circumvention remains a matter of concern. One solution might be the inclusion of an obligation on FLEGT partner countries to report on levels of timber imports and exports and actions taken to prevent circumvention.

The European Commission recently completed a public consultation exercise on options for additional measures. The UK has indicated particular interest in proposals for a new regulation which would make it a crime in a member state, to trade in products which contain or were manufactured from timber that had been illegally harvested, regardless of country of origin. It is important to stress that currently these options are presented in outline; the European Commission has made no formal proposal to the Council of Ministers. A great deal of detailed work must be done to ensure that any future legal instrument represents good and enforceable law.

Northern Ireland

Cancer: Drugs

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what assessment has been carried out by his Department of the effectiveness of Sutent in treating cancer; and if he will make a statement. (133106)

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has responsibility for assessment of the cost and clinical effectiveness of new cancer drugs such as Sutent. In July 2006, the Department established a formal link with NICE (on behalf of the HPSS) under which NICE guidance is reviewed for its applicability to Northern Ireland and, where deemed to be applicable, is endorsed by the Department for implementation in the HPSS. Sutent has not yet been referred to NICE for assessment.

The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) has however assessed this drug and has not recommended its use in the NHS in Scotland. In the absence of an assessment by MCE, local commissioners will be informed by the SMC’s guidance when assessing priorities for the use of specialist drugs moneys in Northern Ireland. In this context, therefore, the Department would not expect Sutent to be widely available for patients in Northern Ireland until further evidence of the clinical and cost effectiveness of the drug is available.

Departments: Official Hospitality

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how much was spent on hospitality by (a) each department in Northern Ireland and (b) his Department in financial year 2006-07. (133253)

The following table shows the amount spent on hospitality by each department in Northern Ireland and the Northern Ireland Office in the financial year 2006-07.

Department

Amount spent on hospitality 2006-07 (£)

DARD

60,618

DCAL

26,590.64

DE

43,983.43

DEL

29,819

DETI

22,664.81

DOE

11,615.03

DFP

140,041

DHSSPS

161,813

DRD

16,596.14

DSD

25,187

OFMDFM

78,523

NIO

404,476

These figures are based on provisional outturn and are therefore subject to change. They relate to expenditure on hospitality and entertainment provided but in the case of DE, DFP and DSD it has not been possible, without incurring disproportionate costs, to completely separate out other associated costs such as room hire.

Expenditure incurred on hospitality by the NIO includes accommodation and hospitality for members of the royal family, visiting dignitaries and Heads of State, and also hospitality for the representatives of business, voluntary and community sectors in Northern Ireland attending the annual garden party at Hillsborough Castle.

Departments: Public Opinion

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will place in the Library a copy of the full results of the scoping study opinion poll commissioned from MORI by his Department. (134250)

My Department has not commissioned a scoping study opinion poll from MORI in respect of the proposed multi-sports stadium at the Maze/Long Kesh site.

Doctors: Recruitment

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on what date he expects doctors who have already been interviewed in Northern Ireland to be informed of the outcome of round one. (133691)

All applicants will be informed of the outcome of round one on completion of the interview process. This is expected at the end of May 2007.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland when he expects medical applicants to the Northern Ireland unit of application to be able to express a preference for a particular hospital and location within the Province. (133692)

Successful applicants will be able to express preferences following the round of interviews, which are expected to be completed at the end of May 2007.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland which specialities have already given junior doctors the opportunity to submit a CV with their application in Northern Ireland. (133696)

In Northern Ireland all recruitment panels had access to full application forms including employment history. Applicants were also asked to bring their complete portfolio to interview.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (1) how many foundation year 2 and senior house officer posts are funded, by speciality, in each of the Northern Ireland hospitals; (133697)

(2) how many foundation year 2 posts he expects to be funded, by speciality, in each of the Northern Ireland hospitals in August.

It is expected that 844 SHO training posts will be funded in total. This includes 231 Foundation 2 and 96 GP posts.

A breakdown of specialities and hospitals based on August 2006 baseline figures will be placed in the Library.

Doctors: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps are taken to ensure that junior doctors (Foundation Year 2 and Senior House Officer) working in paediatrics complete a certified paediatric life support course before being on call in Northern Ireland. (133701)

If, under local clinical governance arrangements, the completion of a certified life support course is a requirement for Foundation year 2 and Senior House Officers working in paediatrics, this should be supported by the Trust.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what the ratio of speciality training to fixed term speciality training appointments is by speciality in Northern Ireland. (133704)

The current ratio of speciality training posts to fixed term speciality training posts is set out in the following table. These figures will be subject to further change through the reallocation of 20 fixed term speciality training posts to GP training posts.

Speciality

Speciality training posts

Fixed term speciality training posts

Ratio

Acute care

26

22

1:1.18

Anaesthetics

22

0

General Practice

67

0

General Medicine

98

67

1:1.46

Obs and Gynae

22

27

0.8:1

Ophthalmology

7

2

3.5:1

Oral and Maxillo-facial surgery

1

0

Paediatrics

40

18

2.22:1

Pathology

6

0

Psychiatry in General

45

26

1:1.73

Radiology

6

0

Surgery

43

68

1.58:1

Neurosurgery

3

1

1:0.33

Total

386

231

1:1.67

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps have been taken to ensure that electronic signatures are verified before assessments are entered on the online NHS eportfolio for junior doctors in Northern Ireland. (133707)

An eportfolio is individually password protected and Trainees are also required to sign a probity declaration.

Driving Offences

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many drivers in Northern Ireland have been (a) issued with fixed penalty fines for excess speed, (b) prosecuted for excess speed, (c) involved in fatal road traffic accidents and (d) prosecuted as a result of being involved in a road traffic accident in the last 12 months. (133234)

PSNI have provided the information in the following table which relates to drivers issued with fixed penalty fines and those drivers reported for prosecution for excess speed in 2006. A total of 1731 drivers were involved in fatal road traffic accidents in this same period. However, the PSNI does not specifically record the number of drivers prosecuted as a result of being involved in a road traffic collision.

1 2006 figures are provisional and subject to change

Excess speed

2006

Received fixed penalty

21,697

Reported for prosecution

3,894

Further Education: Internet

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what records he keeps of the number of people in Northern Ireland enrolled on online further education courses. (133898)

The Department for Employment and Learning does not keep records specifying the number of students enrolled on online further education courses. It is not a mandatory requirement by the Department for further education colleges in Northern Ireland to provide information specifically related to students studying online courses; and colleges in Northern Ireland do not hold definitive data relating to this.

Health Professions: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what the cost has been of the generic skills study days organised by the Northern Ireland Medical and Dental Training Agency. (133693)

The cost of the generic skills study days came to £68,610, which was met within existing NIMDTA resources.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what the cost has been of introducing the online NHS eportfolio website in Northern Ireland. (133694)

There was no cost to Northern Ireland in introducing NHS eportfolio, as it was provided free.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many speciality training posts at (a) first, (b) second and (c) third year he expects to be available by speciality in each Northern Ireland hospital in August. (133699)

The information requested is set out in the following table.

Speciality

ST1

ST2

ST3

ST4

Speciality training posts

Acute care

12

8

6

26

Anaesthetics

9

0

13

22

General practice

55

5

7

67

General medicine

32

29

37

98

Obs and gynae

8

8

6

22

Ophthalmology

1

2

4

7

Oral and maxillo-facial surgery

1

1

Paediatrics

10

10

10

10

40

Pathology

6

6

Psychiatry in general

12

12

12

9

45

Radiology

6

6

Surgery

12

13

18

43

Neurosurgery

1

2

3

Total

165

87

113

21

386

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many fixed term speciality training appointments at (a) first, (b) second and (c) third year he expects to be available, by speciality, in each Northern Ireland hospital in August. (133700)

The information requested is set out in the following table.

Speciality

ST1

ST2

ST3

Fixed term speciality training posts

Acute care

10

12

22

Anaesthetics

0

General practice

0

General medicine

31

36

67

Obs and gynae

14

13

27

Ophthalmology

2

2

Oral and maxillo-facial surgery

0

Paediatrics

4

6

8

18

Pathology

0

Psychiatry in general

7

9

10

26

Radiology

0

Surgery

19

49

68

Neurosurgery

1

1

Total

85

128

18

231

Mentally Ill: Convictions

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many and what percentage of those convicted of criminal offences in Northern Ireland in each of the last five years were sentenced by mental health order disposals. (133129)

The mental health order disposal available in the criminal courts is the hospital order. The following table gives the number of hospital order disposals and the total number of disposals for those convicted, for the calendar years 2001 to 2005. Due to small numbers the percentage of those sentenced by hospital orders has not been calculated.

Data are collated on the principal offence rule; thus only the most serious offence with which an offender is charged is included.

Table: Number of hospital orders and total number of disposals given 2001 to 20051,2

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Number of hospital order disposals

1

3

2

2

6

Total number of disposals

24,350

24,100

26,675

27,925

26,255

1 Data are collated on the principal offence rule; thus only the most serious offence with which an offender is charged is included. 2Data for 2005 are provisional.

Official Publications

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what the (a) findings and (b) recommendations were of the review conducted by the Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister of practice across Departments on the printing and distribution of Government publications. (134079)

Following the implementation of the cross-departmental policy on the use of recycled paper and the adoption of an electronic print policy in October 2005 officials from the Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister performed an informal impact review of the use of recycled paper and the electronic distribution of Government publications. This showed there will be an initial increase in cost but ultimately these will reduce and that there will be a positive environmental impact. On this basis a report is being drafted which will recommend the continuation of the use of recycled paper and electronic publishing in all Government Departments.

Olympic Games: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what representations he has made within Government in the last 12 months about securing benefits to Northern Ireland from the 2012 Olympics. (133624)

The Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure (DCAL) is the lead Northern Ireland Department to ensure Northern Ireland benefits from the potential opportunities that will arise from London hosting the Olympic and Paralympic Games in 2012.

The DCAL Permanent Secretary chairs an Olympic NI Task Force, which consists of representatives from other Government Departments and organisations responsible for delivering the benefits. This Group has met on four occasions over the last 12 months. DCAL works in close partnership with the Department of Culture Media and Sport (DCMS), the lead Government Department and with the London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (LOCOG).

Schools: Playing Fields

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many school playing fields there were in each education and library board area in Northern Ireland in each year since 1997. (133068)

The Education and Library Boards have provided the following information for the number of playing fields at controlled and maintained schools. Information relating to voluntary grammar, grant-maintained integrated and Irish medium schools is not readily available.

Board Area

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Belfast

52

52

52

52

52

52

52

52

53

53

53

Southern

152

152

153

154

154

154

153

153

153

153

153

Western

84

87

90

90

90

89

86

84

84

80

80

North Eastern

121

121

118

118

118

118

118

118

118

116

114

South Eastern

78

78

73

73

73

74

76

76

76

76

76

Sportsgrounds: Lisburn

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how much has been spent on the Maze stadium project to date; how much has been spent on (a) scoping, (b) feasibility and (c) promotion of the Maze stadium project; how much will be spent in total on site clearance; which Departments approved this expenditure; and whether such expenditure came from within existing departmental expenditure limits. (134071)

To date Government and the Strategic Investment Board (SIB) have spent £916,855.38 on the proposed multi-sports stadium project at the Maze/Long Kesh. These costs include £124,727.53 on business planning which incorporate both (a) scoping and (b)feasibility. From 2004 to the end of this financial year, the Office of First and Deputy First Minister (OFMDFM) will have spent some £2.9 million on site clearance, demolition, and decontamination to prepare the Maze/Long Kesh regeneration site for redevelopment. No costs have been incurred on promotion of the stadium. These expenditures were approved by the Department of Culture Arts and Leisure (DCAL) and OFMDFM and are within their existing departmental expenditure limits.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what evaluation was made of the financial feasibility of the Maze stadium project; and if he will place in the Library the report of such evaluation. (134073)

A viability assessment of a shared future multi-sports stadium for Northern Ireland was completed in May 2004. This concluded that the stadium could be operationally viable provided initial capital costs are met and the three sports bodies (Soccer, Rugby and Gaelic) agree to participate.

A copy of this report will be placed in the Library when final agreement has been reached with the three sports bodies and the business case for the stadium has been approved.

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland whether a study was undertaken to assess the viability of alternative sites to the Maze for a regional multi-purpose sports stadium. (134127)

A site selection evaluation exercise carried out in 2004 considered the viability of 12 sites for a shared future multi-sports stadium for Northern Ireland. Following this process, three sites were shortlisted for further, more detailed assessment. On the basis of this, two of the three remaining sites were ruled out on cost and acceptability grounds. This was announced in a press release in March 2005.

Sure Start Programme

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will take steps to implement the recommendations of (a) the Sure Start funding bid and (b) the South Down Family Health Initiative findings. (133334)

The information is as follows:

(a) The expansion of Sure Start is underway. Seven new projects have been created and 19 existing projects have expanded their catchment areas. Most expansions are operational, with the remainder in the process of recruitment of additional staff. Of the new projects, five have commenced delivery of services, and it is expected that the remainder will be operational later in 2007.

(b) In relation to the South Down family health initiative findings, since the report's publication, a part-time project worker has been appointed and a number of local projects have received support from a range of sources. Further funding will be based on an assessment of local priorities and affordability.

Trade and Industry

Electronic Equipment: Waste Disposal

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what representations he has received from non-governmental organisations on individual producer responsibility and the transposition of article 8.2 of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. (134384)

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: The DTI’s consultation in July 2006 prompted 15 responses from non-government organisations on the issue of producer responsibility and Individual producer responsibility.

The Government are committed to the principles of Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR) and will continue to work with producers of EEE to establish a workable and cost effective process for IPR in the UK.

The Government will also be considering how IPR is being addressed by other member states as part of the review of the WEEE Directive by the European Commission due to begin in 2008.

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussions his Department has had with the European Commission on the implementation of article 8.2 of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. (134385)

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: DTI representatives have discussed article 8.2 of the WEEE Directive which introduces individual producer responsibility with the EU on several occasions as part of the UK’s implementation process.

DTI officials will continue to address this issue with the Commission and other member states as part of the review of the Directive scheduled to begin in 2008.

Energy Supply: Complaints

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1) if he will hold discussions with Ofgem on British Gas Services' setting up of a complaints handling service that is available to the public; (133992)

(2) if he will take steps to ensure that energy suppliers have effective and transparent complaints procedures.

The Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill, which is currently before Parliament, would place a duty on the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) to make regulations to prescribe standards for the handling of complaints by regulated suppliers in the energy sector. Regulated energy suppliers will thus be obliged, at the very least, to have in place the prescribed standards of complaints handling. The Bill will also introduce new redress schemes for electricity, gas and postal services, which will be able to resolve the full range of consumer complaints in these sectors and make provision for customer redress, including, where appropriate, the payment of compensation.

Customers currently have access to a complaint-handling service operated by Energywatch if they are unable to resolve a dispute directly with their gas and electricity supplier. Customers may also contact the Energy Supply Ombudsman, which can resolve complaints in respect of problems encountered with billing or changing supplier.

Low Carbon Buildings Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much money has been (a) allocated for grants and (b) disbursed by the Low Carbon Buildings Scheme in each month since the scheme began. (131693)

[holding answer 16 April 2007]: The information is as follows:

£

Month

Allocated

Disbursed

2006

May

118,609.94

0

June

400,809.37

1,600.00

July

796,790.76

4,000.00

August

617,351.89

82,205.44

September

693,352.60

81,379.50

October

1,227,293.12

243,359.07

November

1,227,385.73

298,575.68

December

490,893.77

302,001.19

2007

January

493,267.92

390,058.92

February

464,699.72

551,966.42

March

647,304.95

594,249.85

Pregnant Women: Discrimination

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry pursuant to the answer of 26 March 2007, Official Report, column 1317W, on pregnant women: discrimination, if he will place in the Vote Office copies of the Maternity and Paternity Rights and Benefits in Britain Survey 2005; how members of the public may obtain copies; at what cost; how much it cost his Department to produce the report; what follow up his Department plans to make on the report; how many officials were employed in drafting the report, broken down by grade; and if he will make a statement. (134460)

The Department does not intend to place the report in the Vote Office, however it will arrange for a copy to be lodged in the Libraries of the House. The Maternity and Paternity Rights and Benefits in Britain: Survey of Parents 2005 is publicly available on the Department of Trade and Industry's website. The direct link to the report is: http://www.dti.gov.uk/files/file27446.pdf and the link to the Employment Relations Research Series, in which this publication is number 50, is http://www.dti.gov.uk/employment/research-evalution/errs/. Hard copies of the report are available, free of charge, from the Department's publications order-line—0845 015 0010 and quoting the Unique Reference Number (URN) 06/836.

The cost of conducting the survey was shared with the Department for Work and Pensions. The contribution made by the Department of Trade and Industry for conducting the survey, analysis and to produce the report was approximately £150,000. The Department will consider commissioning a follow-up survey in future years to assess the impact of recent legislative change on maternity and paternity rights. The survey report was drafted by Deborah Smeaton and Alan Marsh of the Policy Studies Institute, an independent research institute which was commissioned by the Department. No officials were employed in the drafting of the report.

Thorp

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the safety implications associated with the re-opening of the Thorp reprocessing plant; and if he will make a statement. (131172)

[holding answer 16 April 2007]: The Health and Safety Executive’s Nuclear Installations Inspectorate issued a Consent on 9 January 2007 to allow the THORP plant to reopen—satisfied that the site licensee had done all work necessary to ensure THORP could be restarted safely. The precise date to restart reprocessing fuel at THORP is a matter for the licensee—Sellafield Ltd. in discussion with the site owner the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority.

Wind Power: Air Traffic Control

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the representations of NATS (En-route) plc in respect of the proposed Brenig wind farm. (134168)

As no application for consent under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 has been lodged in respect of the proposed Brenig wind farm, no such assessment has been made.

Transport

Compulsory Purchase: Flimwell

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether he plans to purchase the Weald Smokery in Flimwell under a compulsory purchase order. (134786)

Draft orders for the A21 schemes have not yet been published, so no properties are currently subject to compulsory purchase. However, the owner of the Weald Smokery has served a Statutory Blight Notice on the Secretary of State and this has been accepted. The property is therefore to be acquired under the blight provisions contained in Section 154(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

Departments: Translation Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) into which languages (a) his Department and (b) each of its executive agencies translates official documents and publications. (134656)

(2) how much (a) his Department and (b) each of its executive agencies spent on translation services in each of the last 10 years.

I refer the hon. Member to my answer to the hon. Member for Dudley North, (Mr. Austin) of 23 January 2007, Official Report, columns 1681-82W.

Manual for Streets

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport whether the Manual for Streets replaces the Places, Streets and Movements and Design Bulletin 32 documents in all circumstances where Places, Streets and Movements and Design Bulletin 32 have been used prior to the publication of Manual for Streets; and if he will make a statement. (134889)

The Manual for Streets replaces Places, Streets and Movement and Design Bulletin 32 for the design of residential streets. Places, Streets and Movement and Design Bulletin 32 were intended for residential roads and footpaths although may have been more widely applied. As with the guidance it replaces, Manual for Streets applies to residential streets. However the manual states that many of its key principles may be applicable to other types of streets, for example high streets and lightly-trafficked lanes in rural areas. It is the responsibility of users of the manual to ensure that its application to the design of non-residential streets is appropriate.

Railways: Hastings

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what plans he has to change (a) the timetabling and (b) the frequency of train services along the Hastings to Charing Cross line; and if he will make a statement. (134785)

The franchise agreement with London and South Eastern Railway, the train operator for Kent services, requires the provision of services on the Hastings to Charing Cross route with characteristics similar to those that exist today. The detail of the timetable necessary to fulfil that contractual obligation is a matter for the train operator to agree with Network Rail.

Roads: Darlington

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many road traffic (a) accidents and (b) fatalities there were in Darlington (i) involving drivers aged under 21 years and (ii) in total in each of the last 10 years. (135016)

The number of reported personal injury road accidents and the resulting number of fatalities (i) involving drivers aged under 21 years, and (ii) in total, in the unitary authority of Darlington for each year since 1996 are given in the table. 2005 is the latest year for which data are available.

(i) Accidents in the unitary authority of Darlington involving at least one driver under the age of 21 and resulting fatalities GB: 1996-2005

(a) Accidents

(b) Fatalities

1996

90

3

1997

81

3

1998

92

2

1999

85

0

2000

86

0

2001

77

0

2002

78

1

2003

82

0

2004

72

1

2005

75

0

(ii) Accidents and resulting fatalities in the unitary authority of Darlington GB: 1996-2005

(a) Accidents

(b) Fatalities

1996

374

10

1997

394

5

1998

398

6

1999

367

5

2000

361

1

2001

355

3

2002

373

8

2003

343

3

2004

340

5

2005

325

5

Constitutional Affairs

Courts: Manpower

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what estimate she has made of the turnover of staff in the court system in each of the last three years. (134164)

The turnover rate for staff in Her Majesty’s courts service for the last two years is as follows:

1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006—9 per cent.

1 April 2006 to 31 March 2007—9 per cent.

In the year prior to April 2005 the turnover rate for the court service excluding magistrates courts was:

1 April 2004 to 31 March 2005—5 per cent.

There are no centrally held figures for the magistrates prior to the creation of HMCS. The 42 Magistrates Committees maintained their own HR records. The cost of obtaining figures prior to April 2005 can be obtained only at a disproportionate cost.

Departments: Paper

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what percentage of paper used (a) for photocopying and (b) in printed publications by her Department was from recycled sources in each of the last three years. (134058)

My Department has a single contract for office supplies that operates across all business areas. Under this arrangement the percentage breakdown of paper used for photocopying obtained from recycled sources in each of the last three years is set out as follows.

Recycled paper percentage

2004-05

16.57

2005-06

21.88

2006-07

33.09

My Department obtains printed publications from variety of sources. Figures on percentage breakdown of paper used in printed publications from recycled stock over the past three years have not been held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Fines: Compensation

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what discretion magistrates have in implementing the victims’ surcharge when the sentence is a fine. (134421)

Magistrates have no discretion in implementing the victims’ surcharge when the sentence is a fine. They have a duty under section 161A(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to impose a surcharge. By virtue of the Surcharge Order it must be imposed in all cases where the sentence is a fine, whether or not any other penalty is imposed.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs who is responsible for (a) notification and (b) collection of the victims’ surcharge; what estimate has been made of the cost of collecting each victims’ surcharge; what funds have been allocated for the collection of the surcharge; and to which budget they have been allocated. (134422)

The court which imposes the victims’ surcharge is responsible for notification of the surcharge. Collecting the surcharge is the responsibility of the magistrates court, in the same way that they currently collect other financial impositions. As the courts are using existing systems, process and legislation (fines collection scheme) and the victims’ surcharge is being treated in the same way as a fine for the purposes of enforcement, there are no additional implementation costs for this Department.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what representations she has received on the victims’ surcharge since its introduction. (134423)

The Department has passed any representations received on the victims’ surcharge to the Home Office to respond to as they have lead policy responsibility for the issue. We do not keep a log of representations passed on this way.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what discussions her Department had with (a) magistrates and (b) court clerks before the introduction of the victims’ surcharge; and if she will make a statement. (134424)

The Department consulted with the Magistrates’ Association and Justices’ Clerks’ Society on the implementation of the victims’ surcharge. The surcharge was discussed by the DCA’s Criminal Enforcement Policy Advisory Group where the Justices’ Clerks’ Society and Magistrates’ Association were represented. Both organisations went on to jointly produce guidance for justices’ clerks and magistrates on the application of the surcharge.

Members: Correspondence

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs when she expects to reply to the letter from the hon. Member for Castle Point of 30 March on Mrs. Wendy Gillespie. (134366)

My Department has no record of receiving your letter of 30 March. However, my officials are preparing a response to your earlier related letter of 6 March. I apologise for the delay.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs pursuant to the answer of 27 November 2006, Official Report, column 342W, on the community legal service, when she expects to provide a substantive reply to the Question; and what the reason is for the delay. (134367)

My reply to the hon. Member on 27 November 2006, Official Report, column 342W, referred him to the list of highest paid barristers receiving fees out of the Community Legal Service during 2004-05. These were the latest figures available at the time the hon. Member tabled his question.

Equivalent information for 2005-06 has now been verified with the barristers concerned and this will appear on my Department’s website shortly. I will notify the hon. Member once it has been made available.

Ministry of Justice: Manpower

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what steps have been taken to train Home Office staff who will transfer to the Ministry of Justice following its creation. (134352)

Staff from the Home Office and Department for Constitutional Affairs transferring to the Ministry of Justice will continue to carry out their usual functions on and immediately after its creation on 9 May. We will be working with colleagues from the Home Office to determine what training and information they will need to support them through the change. DCA has experience of transferring large groups of staff from the creation of HM Courts Service in 2005 and The Tribunals Service in 2006. Information will be communicated through the departmental intranet, including regularly updated FAQ pages.

Opinion Leader Research

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what payments her Department has made to (a) Opinion Leader Research and (b) Deborah Mattinson in each year since 1997. (133716)

The Department has only made payments to Opinion Leader Research and are detailed as follows:

£

1997 to 2004-05

0

2005-06

76,316

2006-07

77,154

Sentencing

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will publish information on judges to allow comparison of their sentencing for the same offences. (132253)

There are no plans to enable analysis of sentences by individual judge. It would not be possible to analyse the sentencing decisions of individual judges in such a way as to allow for any meaningful comparison, as no two offences or offenders are identical. It is the role of the Court of Appeal Criminal Division to ensure consistency of sentencing, either in relation to appeals against sentence or references by the Attorney-General.

Vetting

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what the average cost is of carrying out a Criminal Records Bureau check. (134166)

My Department pays fees to the Criminal Records Bureau which carries out the checks. These are currently £31 for a standard disclosure and £36 for an enhanced disclosure. The additional cost of processing checks within my Department is not kept centrally and is available only at disproportionate cost.

Vetting: Training

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what the average cost was of training officers in the court system to perform Criminal Records Bureau checks in the latest period for which figures are available. (134167)

My Department currently has 40 staff in its Human Resources Directorate who are trained in assessing criminal records information received from the Criminal Records Bureau. These are supported by administrative staff who have been trained in the checks process. These staff perform criminal records checks duties as part of their job roles. The cost of training these staff is not held centrally and is available only at disproportionate cost.

Deputy Prime Minister

Climate Change

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what recent discussions he has had with international counterparts on climate change. (134039)

I have just returned from China where my meetings with Premier Wen and State Councillor Tang included discussion on the importance of international co-operation on climate change. I also presented a proposal for Sino-UK collaboration in creating sustainable cities, launched phase II of the UK-China Sustainable Development Dialogue and delivered three keynote speeches on sustainability and climate change to international audiences.

Earlier in April, I launched the British Embassy / British Council climate change campaign “Opportunity through Action” in Prague with keynote speeches at a dinner debate and a youth conference. I engaged Czech Prime Minister Topolanek, and Deputy Prime Ministers Bursik and Vondra on the subject of climate change during separate bilateral meetings and later that week I discussed similar issues with Maltese Prime Minister Gonzi and President Adami.

Departments: EC Action

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many EU Council meetings he has attended; and who represents him if he is unable to attend. (133754)

Ministers and civil servants attend many meetings as part of the process of policy development and advice. It is not the normal practice of Government to disclose details or attendance at such meetings. However, I can state that the British Government is always represented at EU Council meetings.

Defence

Armed Forces: Council Tax

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 16 April 2007, Official Report, column 130W, on the armed forces: council tax, what options are being considered; when he expects to publish his proposals; and what powers there are to ensure that his proposals are implemented across the United Kingdom. (133164)

We are discussing with Communities and Local Government both statutory and non-statutory options for providing support for the council tax costs in England of service personnel deployed on operations abroad. We wish to find a solution to this as soon as possible.

Any decision to implement a statutory council tax discount scheme in Wales and Scotland, or a new domestic rate relief in Northern Ireland would be entirely a matter for the Welsh Assembly, Scottish Executive and Northern Ireland Assembly.

Armed Forces: Footwear

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what type of footwear is issued to members of the armed forces as (a) part of their standard kit and (b) when deployed to operations in Iraq; where this footwear is sourced from; and if he will make a statement. (133465)

[holding answer 24 April 2007]: Footwear supplied to the armed forces is of the following types: Combat; Parade/Ceremonial; and Safety Footwear. The standard issue footwear as part of the Combat Soldier 95 ensemble is the Combat Assault Boot.

Troops deploying on operations in Iraq are issued with Desert Combat Boots. Lightweight patrol boots are also available depending on the duties being undertaken in theatre.

Most footwear is sourced through the prime contractor, Iturri, a Spanish footwear manufacturer.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has made of the lifetime of footwear issued to members of the armed forces; how often new footwear is issued to members of the armed forces; and if he will make a statement. (133466)

The life expectancy of footwear varies between each type depending on use and conditions. In broad terms the expectation is: Combat Boots should last between one and five years (although Jungle Boots and Desert Boots may only have a life of six weeks or six months respectively); Parade/Ceremonial Boots are repairable and can last from one to five years plus; Safety Footwear six months to two years.

When boots are no longer serviceable or there has been a change in the users’ needs, replacement boots can be obtained or requested from the Unit Quartermasters both in the UK and overseas.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what tests were conducted as part of the procurement procedure of the footwear issued to members of the armed forces; what (a) temperature, (b) weather and (c) terrain conditions were used as part of these tests; and if he will make a statement. (133467)

[holding answer 24 April 2007]: When new footwear requirements, designs and materials are introduced, they are subjected to laboratory testing and trials in the locations and conditions for which the item has been designed. The new version of the desert combat boot, introduced in March 2006, is a modification of the existing design, which has been in use since around 2000. Testing in this case was therefore limited to that done in the laboratory.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the monthly expenditure on footwear for members of the armed forces was in (a) 1999 and (b) 2006; and if he will make a statement. (133468)

[holding answer 24 April 2007]: The current five-year enabling arrangement for supplying footwear to the armed forces was awarded in 2004. The estimated value of the contract is between £8 million and £9 million per year.

The information prior to 2004 is not held centrally and could be provided at only disproportionate cost.

Armed Forces: Health Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what ring-fenced capacity in each speciality his Department requested from the Department of Health in each year since 2001; and what the cost of this capacity was. (132629)

There is no ‘ring fenced’ capacity but the MOD has negotiated accelerated access to hospital assessment and treatment from the five Ministry of Defence Hospital Units (MDHU) host trusts and the University Hospital Birmingham Foundation Trust (UHBFT). The cost of this delivery in 2006-07 was just under £30 million.

The historic figures for the MDHU spend on accelerated access are as follows:

£ million

2001-02

22.4

2002-03

23.7

2003-04

25.1

2004-05

26.8

2005-06

27.5

2006-07

29.8

Furthermore, MOD and the Department of Health have agreed an integrated plan for reception arrangements for military patients (RAMP), to manage the reception of injured military personnel in NHS hospitals. This covers the reporting of patients, their medical reception, movement, tracking, care and administration within the NHS.

The military managed ward (MMW) located in the orthopaedic/trauma ward in Selly Oak hospital (part of UHBFT) provides clinical care, by a combined team of military and civilian personnel, for military patients whose clinical condition allows for them to be nursed in this ward.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many civilian medical personnel assisted in the provision of medical support on military operations overseas in each year since 2001, broken down by operation. (132851)

The number of individual civilian medical personnel who have been employed on operations overseas in each calendar year is shown in the following table:

Operation:

Oculus—Balkans

Telic—Iraq

2001

2002

2003

1

2004

4

6

2005

1

11

2006

21

Armed Forces: Housing

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what recent discussions his Department has held with (a) the Local Government Association, (b) veterans' associations, (c) the Gurkha Welfare Association and (d) others on the housing needs resulting from army discharges. (130526)

Discussions take place regularly with the Department for Communities and Local Government and other interested parties, these include a quarterly meeting involving representatives from the veterans' and wider charitable organisations. I met with my hon. Friend the Minister of State for Local Government and Community Cohesion (Mr. Woolas) on 13 March to discuss housing issues. Recent discussions have covered a wide range of subjects including veterans' homelessness projects of current interest and research into levels of homelessness among veterans and the measures to address these.

There have been no recent direct discussions with the Local Government Association or Gurkha specific charitable organisations.

Armed Forces: Inheritance Tax

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) whether inheritance tax is payable on the estate of service personnel who are killed (a) on active service and (b) on overseas service outside the theatre of war; (132854)

(2) under what circumstances inheritance tax is waived on the estate of service people killed in the line of duty.

Under S154 of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984, liability to inheritance tax does not apply in relation to the death of service personnel, where the Secretary of State for Defence, or the Defence Council, certifies that the individual died from a wound inflicted, accident occurring, or disease contracted, either on active service against an enemy, or on other service of a warlike nature. This includes current operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Should an individual die from an injury or disease contracted at some previous time, with death being due to, or hastened by, the aggravation of the injury or illness which occurred during a period when the aforementioned conditions applied, then consideration is given on a case-by-case basis to granting an exemption from a liability to inheritance tax.

As part of the assistance provided to bereaved families, the MOD Joint Casualty and Compassionate Centre (JCCC) considers whether the circumstances of a death of anyone currently serving in the armed forces allows an exemption from inheritance tax and, where appropriate, provide the executor or family member with a certificate of exemption which can be passed to the relevant tax office.

For claims arising as a result of injuries or illness sustained in previous conflicts or in retirement, applications for an exemption have to be made to the JCCC by the executor/next of kin following the death of the individual concerned.

Armed Forces: Military Aircraft

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many Lockheed WP-3D Orion aircraft he plans to purchase for the (a) Royal Air Force and (b) Royal Navy. (134330)

The WP-3D variant of the US Lockheed Orion aircraft family was developed for the US Government as a weather research aircraft. There are no plans to procure any of these aircraft for the Royal Navy or Royal Air Force.

Armed Forces: Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will take steps to implement the proposal in Early Day Motion 67 that all ex-servicemen and women should be treated equally in the payment of pensions regardless of when they served in Her Majesty’s armed forces. (133648)

The situation remains as set out by my right hon. Friend, the Minister for the Armed Forces (Mr. Ingram) on 31 January 2007, Official Report, columns 337-40, during the adjournment debate secured by my hon. Friend the Member for Morley and Rothwell (Mr. Challen).

BAE Systems

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many meetings his private office has had with representatives of BAE Systems in the last 12 months; and what was discussed at each such meeting. (129443)

Over the period 1 April 2006 to 31 March 2007, officials from the Private Office of the Minister for Defence Equipment and Support held a total of 12 meetings with representatives of BAE Systems. These meetings were to make arrangements for, or follow up on, actions from meetings between the Minister and BAES management. No other MOD ministerial Private Office staff met representatives of BAES Systems in this period.

Bell 212 Helicopters

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many Bell 212 helicopters are in service with the British Army; and in which theatres they are deployed. (134201)

There are seven Bell 212 helicopters in service with the British Army, which are leased to the MOD under a civil owned military registered (COMR) contract. Of these, three are used by 7 Flt AAC in support of Brunei garrison and three by 25 Flt AAC in support of the British Army training support unit in Belize. There is an additional Bell 212 based at the School of Army Aviation (SAAvn) in Middle Wallop for aircrew training.

Bombs

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many cluster bombs or their equivalents (a) are in the ownership of the Government and (b) have been ordered and have yet to be delivered; what will happen to these stocks; and if he will make a statement. (131397)

I am withholding details about current and future in-service cluster munitions stock levels because its disclosure would, or would be likely to, prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the armed forces.

As my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Defence announced in his written ministerial statement on 20 March 2007, Official Report, columns 36-37WS, we have withdrawn two types of cluster munitions, the RBL 755 and the MLRS M26, from service with immediate effect. Stocks of these munitions will undergo disposal. The disposal of other cluster munitions that have also been withdrawn from service (155mm HE M483, BL 755 and IBL 755) will continue. No further stocks of these munitions have been ordered.

Holdings of cluster munitions that have been withdrawn from service and are awaiting disposal, rounded to the nearest 100, are:

Quantity

BL 755 (including the RBL 755 and the IBL 755) bombs

2,500

MLRS M26 rocket pods

7,200

HE M483 shells

16,900

HE M483 shells (unfused/incomplete)

2,400

Defence and Communications Services Agency

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence for what reason the technical apprenticeships programme in the Defence and Communication Services Agency was wound down; and if he will make a statement. (133007)

The DEandS Information Systems and Services—formerly the Defence Communications Services Agency—has run a three-year modern technical apprenticeship scheme since 2003. The scheme, which is delivered at HMS Collingwood in Hampshire, is designed to equip those successfully completing it with the skills and attributes required of the organisation's future technical managers. This scheme continues.

Once HMS Collingwood was established, the previous legacy schemes run at Royal Air Force Henlow in Bedfordshire and at Highbury college, Portsmouth, which the Agency acquired in 2000, were discontinued in 2005 as they no longer provided the training and development necessary for technical staff working increasingly closely with commercial delivery partners.

Defence Dental Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many Defence dental service officers were based (a) in the UK and (b) abroad, including those deployed on operations, in each of the last five years. (132623)

The numbers of Defence dental service officers are shown in the following table, as at 1 April in the year stated:

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

UK

Military

218

198

198

198

200

Civilian

42

42

42

42

42

Abroad

Military

52

52

52

52

50

Civilian

11

11

11

11

11

No civilian dental practitioners are deployed on operations. The uniformed Defence Dental Service Officers deployed on operations are drawn from the total cadre based in the UK and abroad as shown above. The numbers deployed on operations overseas in each calendar year were:

Operations

2002

12

2003

44

2004

36

2005

36

2006

48

Defence Medical Service

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many absences of Defence medical service staff were recorded at each Ministry of Defence hospital unit headquarters in each year since 2001; and what the reasons were for such absences. (132628)

Defence Medical Services personnel employed in the five MOD hospital units may be absent from those units because they are undertaking military operational duties or training, or are on leave, or for other reasons. All absences are approved and recorded as necessary. However, the information requested could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Departments: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many (a) uniformed and (b) civilian personnel work in (i) his Department's main building, (ii) the Old War Office Building and (iii) St. George's Court. (130588)

[holding answer 29 March 2007]: The information requested is set out in the following table. The numbers relate to MOD military and civil service personnel permanently deployed to the respective buildings as at 1 April 2007. These figures can change on a day to day basis, and do not include contractor personnel or staff temporarily operating out of these buildings.

Military personnel

Civilian personnel

Total

Main building

1,024

2,206

3,230

Old War Office building

272

637

909

St. George's Court

116

674

790

Total

1,412

3,517

4,929

Departments: Money

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much cash was physically lost by his Department in each of the last 10 financial years for which information is available. (134504)

The amount of cash and cash equivalents (e.g. bank notes, postal orders, stamps and travel warrants) physically lost by the Department within the last three years is:

£

2003-04

93,074.51

2004-05

7,438.06

2005-06

154,683.27

Information on cash losses prior to 2003-04 is not held centrally and can be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Departments: Parliamentary Questions

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many questions tabled by hon. and right hon. Members to his Department for oral answer have been transferred to other departments since May 2005. (133806)

Our records indicate that two oral questions tabled to this Department have been transferred since May 2005.

Electoral Commission

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer by the hon. Member for Gosport, representing the Speaker’s Committee on the Electoral Commission, of 27 November 2006, Official Report, columns 261-62W, on annual canvass: armed forces, if he will place in the Library a copy of the results of the evaluation of the campaign. (134502)

Evaluation of the survey carried out to monitor registration levels and awareness among service personnel is not yet complete. I will place a copy of the report in the Library of the House when it becomes available.

Falkland Islands: Armed Conflict

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what steps his Department is taking to assist (a) the funding of and (b) practical arrangements for events held by servicemen and women to mark the 25th anniversary of the Falklands war. (132848)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer that I gave, on the funding of events to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the Falklands conflict, on 22 February 2007, Official Report, column 857W, to the hon. Member for Chorley (Mr. Hoyle).

In addition to the national commemorative events in June that my Department is organising, the armed forces are providing practical support in the form of hosting or supporting a number of other events that are being arranged around the country.

Military Aircraft: Procurement

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 29 March 2007, Official Report, column 1671W, on military aircraft procurement, whether the four Britten Norman Defender aircraft are still deployed in Iraq. (134200)

It is not appropriate to comment on equipment currently deployed on operations as to do so could compromise operational security and the safety of service personnel.

Royal School of Military Engineering: Private Finance Initiative

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the reasons are for the delays encountered during the Royal School of Military Engineering Private Finance Initiative contract negotiations; what impact the delay in signing the contract has had on the training of military engineers; and what measures are being taken to ensure that contract signatures for similar projects are not delayed. (133341)

Work is ongoing to identify a solution for the Department that provides best value for money and is technically viable, on conclusion of which, the project, subject to successful completion of negotiations, is expected to proceed to contract award in the first half of 2008.

The Royal School of Military Engineering (RSME) continues to deliver well-trained and motivated military engineers to meet the operational requirements of the armed forces. This output has not been affected by the ongoing RSME Project.

Royal Yacht: Repairs and Maintenance

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will take steps to remove the cost of the upkeep of the Royal Yacht from the public purse; and if he will make a statement. (134515)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 16 April 2007, Official Report, column 161W.

Service Accommodation

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 1 February 2006, Official Report, columns 512-13W, on service accommodation, for what reason single living accommodation is not assessed for standard for condition. (134625)

When single living accommodation (SLA) is assessed in respect of its grade for charge the process specifically includes an assessment of the physical condition of the property; along with other aspects including, scale, environment and location.

Currently, this information is not assembled centrally into “standard for condition” statistics in the same way as for service family accommodation. The Department is, however, looking at the scope for grading all accommodation on a common basis in the future.

Sudan: Peace Keeping Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans the Government has to contribute (a) personnel, (b) hardware and (c) finances to the hybrid force proposed for Darfur. (134943)

Discussions between the UN and African Union (AU) on a hybrid force for Darfur continue. The peacekeeping force is expected to be funded by UN assessed contributions, but the UN’s Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) has not yet issued a list of requirements for personnel and equipment. The UK contributes 7.8 per cent. of the UN assessed peacekeeping budget worldwide.

The UK fully supports the African Union Mission in Sudan (AMIS) in its peacekeeping role in Darfur. DPKO has undertaken extensive planning for support to AMIS, with one UK military planner deployed to New York to assist. At UN request, MOD has provided two further officers to fill key appointments in the first (light support package) phase of UN deployments. They are now in Sudan. The UK is also considering a UN request to send another officer to DPKO to assist with preparations for the AU-UN hybrid force.

The Department will consider what further support can be provided when the plans for the hybrid force-are mature.

Education and Skills

Building Schools for the Future Programme: Leicestershire

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much funding his Department plans to allocate to Leicestershire local education authority for the Building Schools for the Future programme. (133709)

Leicestershire local authority has four Building Schools for the Future (BSF) projects, which have been provisionally prioritised for waves 10-12 and waves 13-15 of the programme. Funding for projects in these waves has not yet been allocated.

Leicestershire currently has a phase one ‘one-school-pathfinder’ project concerning King Edward VII School, which has been allocated £26 million of capital funding.

72 local authorities with 87 projects are included in BSF waves one to six. A further 40 authorities are receiving a single-school project. Together with academies, a total of about 1,000 secondary schools are in line for modernisation.

Children’s Centres: Warrington

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much capital has been (a) spent and (b) allocated for future years for the development of children's centres in Warrington. (134028)

For the period 2004-06, £961,633 capital was made available to Warrington for the delivery of Sure Start services.

The General Sure Start Grant (GSSG) made available £3,185,235 capital for the period 2006-08 for the delivery of Sure Start children's services.

The CSR settlement gives us an overall spending envelope for 2008-11 which will enable us to deliver our key priorities for children, young people and learners. A specific capital allocation for Warrington will be made later in the year.

City Academies: Comprehensive Schools

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what representations he has received on the potential impact of city academies on nearby comprehensive schools. (134192)

Each academy proposal is subject to a formal consultation process during its feasibility stage, and many representations about academy proposals are received, including the potential impact of academies on neighbouring schools.

City Academies: Consultants

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many project consultants have been engaged by (a) his Department and (b) associated bodies in the Academy Scheme; by what process consultants are appointed for the Scheme; and how much the Department has spent on such consultants. (133854)

The Academies programme requires a wide range of skills including some which are outside the core civil service skills. Since the Academies programme began in December 2000 the Department for Education and Skills has spent £20,161,977 on a range of consultancy services for the Academies programme. The Department currently has 46 separate contracts for the provision of consultancy services to the Academies programme including:

an ongoing independent evaluation of the programme;

programme management expertise;

school improvement and intervention;

background checks to determine the suitability of potential sponsors,

legal advice, construction procurement expertise

Each Academy project also has an overall project manager who is initially contracted to the Department but whose contract transfers to the individual Academy Trust once the funding agreement is signed. The total cost of these project management services from the start of the programme is £28,338,823. There are now 47 open academies and 90 in the pipeline.

Consultancy services are procured for the Academies programme in accordance with the Departmental Procurement Policy and the EU Procurement Directives.

Curriculum

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills on what evidential basis the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority adopted the approach to the curriculum outlined in the National Curriculum planning guidance and draft supporting materials. (134176)

The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority’s (QCA) approach to the curriculum outlined in the National Curriculum planning guidance and supporting materials is built on evidence from ongoing work with schools and colleges. The ‘futures in action’ programme, which has been running since 2005, has continued to demonstrate a high degree of consensus about many of the characteristics of how the curriculum should be shaped. QCA’s work is also supported by the results of its annual curriculum monitoring programme which includes interviews and questionnaires with head teachers, deputy heads, teachers and pupils.

Diplomas for England

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what steps his Department is taking to train teachers to deliver the new Diplomas for England programme; and how much is being spent on such training. (134541)

The Department has already put in place a broad programme of support to ensure that those teaching the Diplomas—as well as those who will be leading and supporting the changes—will be well equipped to do so. The Department is working in partnership with the Centre for Excellence in Leadership (CEL), Lifelong Learning UK (LLUK), the National Assessment Agency (NAA), the National College for School Leadership (NCSL), the Quality Improvement Agency (QIA), the Secondary National Strategies (SNS), the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust (SSAT), and the Training and Development Agency (TDA).

Building on the existing skills of the education workforce, the programme provided by QIA and SSAT includes three days of continuing professional development spread through the 2007/08 academic year for leading Diploma practitioners from each consortium of schools and colleges that will teach Diplomas from 2008. Online materials, a training needs analysis tool, an online community and other resources will supplement this training and encourage collaboration between Diploma-teaching institutions. In future some initial teacher training placements will also be tailored specifically to Diploma teaching.

In the financial year 2007-08 my Department has allocated a total of £45 million for the support of the 14 to 19 workforce development programmes.

Education: Leicestershire

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what capital funding he made available to Leicestershire county council in each financial year since 1996-97. (133811)

Schools capital funding allocated to Leicestershire county council, including direct to schools in its area, in each financial year since 1996-97 is set out in the following table:

£ million

1996-97

3.6

1997-98

2.9

1998-99

6.5

1999-2000

9.2

2000-01

21.0

2001-02

15.8

2002-03

25.4

2003-04

27.6

2004-05

33.8

2005-06

35.7

2006-07

41.0

Education: Warrington

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the total amount of capital spending on education in Warrington was in each year since 1997. (134027)

Schools capital funding allocated to Warrington, including direct to schools in its area, in each financial year since it achieved unitary status in 1998, is set out in the following table.

Amount (£ million)

1998-99

3.7

1999-2000

4.7

2000-01

8.7

2001-02

9.0

2002-03

10.0

2003-04

8.8

2004-05

8.0

2005-06

9.8

2006-07

12.1

GCSEs

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills which 200 maintained mainstream schools had the lowest proportion of pupils achieving five or more GCSEs including English, mathematics, science and a modern foreign language in 2006. (133461)

[holding answer 23 April 2007]: The information requested has been placed in the House of Commons Library. Data for all schools was provided in the answer to PQ 112152 on 16 April 2007, Official Report, column 298W.

The link to the answer for PQ 112152 giving figures for all schools is at the following address:

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/cgi-bin/newhtml_hl?DB=semukparl&STEMMER=en&WORDS=112152&ALL=&ANY=&PHRASE=&CATEGORIES=&SIMPLE=&SPEAKER=&COLOUR=red&STYLE=s&ANCHOR=70416w0063.htm_wqn0&URL=/pa/cm200607/cmhansrd/cm070416/text/70416w0063.htm#70416w0063.htm wqn0

This analysis is based on the revised 2006 KS4 data.

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) how many students achieved five GCSEs at grade C or above including English and mathematics in each year since 1997, excluding those students who achieved grade C equivalent at GNVQ; (133847)

(2) how many students achieved five GCSEs at grade C or above including English, mathematics, science and a modern foreign language in each year since 1997, excluding those students who achieved grade C or equivalent at GNVQ;

(3) how many students achieved five GCSEs at grade C or above including English, mathematics and science in each year since 1997, excluding those students who achieved grade C or equivalent at GNVQ.

[holding answer 24 April 2007]: The following table shows the percentage of 15-year-old pupils1 achieving five or more GCSEs excluding GNVQs2 at grades A*-C including the subjects listed in each year since 19972.

1 Pupils aged 15 at the start of the academic year i.e. 31 August.

2 At least a pass grade at a full intermediate GNVQ is equivalent to four GCSEs at grades A*-C.

Percentage

English and mathematics

English, mathematics and science

English, mathematics, science and MFL

1997

35.6

33.2

25.7

1998

36.9

34.3

27.5

1999

38.6

35.7

29.1

2000

39.9

36.9

29.8

2001

40.6

37.6

30.4

2002

41.9

38.6

30.3

2003

41.5

38.5

28.5

2004

42.2

39.0

28.4

2005

43.6

40.3

28.0

2006

44.2

40.4

25.8

Martial Arts: Schools

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what his Department's expenditure on promoting martial arts in schools was in each year since 1997. (127411)

Funding is not allocated on an individual activity or sport basis. In the five years to 2008, the Government have invested an additional £978 million in PE and school sport through the national school sport strategy. Where there is a perceived need, schools and school sport partnerships will allocate resources to martial arts locally.

The percentage of schools in a school sport partnership offering martial arts has risen from 4 per cent. in 2003/04 to 9 per cent . in 2005/06.

Parenting Support

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what steps are being taken to assist local authorities in providing parenting support. (133684)

[holding answer 26 April 2007]: Local authorities are central to our ambitions to deliver additional support to parents and we will continue to support and collaborate with them.

On 15 March 2007, we published, “Every Parent Matters”, which describes the Government's commitment to support the development of a wide range of services for parents to access, as and when they need it. It makes clear that local authorities will be at the heart of planning and delivering these services locally.

In October 2006 we published “Parenting Support”, guidance for local authorities which describes the approach needed to develop a local strategy to provide a continuum of support for all parents. At the same time we launched the Commissioner's Toolkit, a database of parenting programmes including information on what research suggests about the effectiveness of current interventions. This toolkit is designed to equip commissioners to make decisions which better suit the needs of parents in their community. Over 2006-08 local authorities will receive the £7.5 million Parenting Support Strategy Grant. Its purpose is to assist local authorities in developing and implementing a strategic approach to parenting support, and build upon strategic approaches already in place.

We have spent over £2.1 billion establishing and sustaining Sure Start Local Programmes and Children's Centres, since 1999, initially in some of our most disadvantaged areas. Currently there are 1,258 children's centres, providing a range of high quality early learning, health and parental support to a million young children under five and their families. There will be 2,500 centres by 2008, and 3,500 by 2010, one for every community. Additionally, we are establishing extended services for pupils, families and the wider community in all schools across the country. The extended schools core offer includes services providing parenting support, and over 4,500 schools are now delivering the offer. All schools will do so by 2010.

A number of pilots have been developed with local authorities to deliver new ways of supporting parents. The learning from many of these pilots will inform the further roll out of extended schools and Sure Start Children's Centres. For example, Early Learning Partnerships are running in 19 local authorities; targeting hard to reach families and promoting their engagement in early learning for children aged one to three years. Transition information sessions will be run in 20 local authorities by autumn 2007, preparing parents of children in reception and year seven to cope with the wide range of possible challenges that their children may face. Parent Support Advisers are providing a preventative school based role to support parents in 977 schools in 20 local authorities, and we will look to spread practice widely through extended schools. 15 local authorities have been selected to receive a share of £5 million per annum for 2006-07 and 2007-08 to deliver Parenting Early Intervention Pathfinders—testing different parenting programmes for the families of eight to 13-year-olds at risk of antisocial behaviour. We are investing £10 million per annum to develop the National Academy for Parenting Practitioners. The academy will have a key role in improving practice, training and support for the parenting workforce.

Pre-school Education: Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what total amount was spent on (a) pre-school education and (b) school nursery education in each of the last 20 years, at today’s prices. (133353)

[holding answer 23 April 2007]: The available information is contained within the following table which shows central and local government expenditure on under fives. Separate figures for pre-school education and school nursery education are not available. Capital expenditure is not included in these figures.

Expenditure1989-901,3471990-911,4731991-921,6201992-931,7491993-941,8431994-951,9441995-961,9651996-972,0051997-982,1141998-992,1571999-20002,3992000-012,6832001-023,2322002-033,2912003-043,6572004-0513,9202005-0624,010 1 Provisional.2 Estimated.Notes:1. Figures within Departmental Expenditure Limits (DEL). Excludes DfES administration costs and expenditure on other areas than education, for instance on children and families and on skills. Figures for 1998-99 onwards are resource-based. Central government figures for 1995-96 to 1997-98 are cash-based.2. Differences between the totals above and the figures for Under 5’s education spending in HM Treasury’s PESA Report are the result of (a) data coverage: the exclusion of AME items in the above table, (b) definitional differences: Departmental administration costs and Ofsted spending on education are both classified as education spending under UN Classification of Functions of Government (COFOG) international definitions—the above table excludes these, (c) classifications made since Budget 2006 of Connexions spending to social protection and Adult Education spend to training in line with UN COFOG definitions, (d) further minor data coverage and timing differences.3. The recurrent local authority figures in this table are drawn from the Local Authority Expenditure table (Table 8.3 of the 2006 Departmental Report); the footnotes to that table set out the underlying data sources. The blank rows denote the changes from the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions education Revenue Outturn return (the ‘RO1’) to Section 52 Outturn Statements in 1999-2000 and arising from the review of the Section 52 categories in 2002-03 following the introduction of Consistent Financial Reporting to schools.4. All figures have been converted to 2005-06 price levels using the 27 September 2006 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) deflators.5. Central Government funding on grant-maintained schools has been apportioned to under-fives using pupil numbers.6. Figures from 2003-04 onwards reflect the transfer of responsibility from the Department to LEAs of costs relating to teachers’ pensions.7. Under five figures include education expenditure on Sure Start (Sure Start figures exclude current grant).8. Sources of the figures in the table are as follows: 1997-98 to 2005-06 from the Education Select Committee table, 1995-96 to 1996-97 from the November 2005 Education Bulletin, 1993-94 to 1994-95 from the November 2004 Bulletin, 1989-90 to 1992-93 from the Departmental Reports.

Private Education: Charities

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what criteria will be included in the public benefit test to enable private schools to satisfy the requirements for charitable status. (121943)

[holding answer 26 February 2007]: This is a matter for the Charity Commission as the Government Department responsible for the regulation of charities in England and Wales. The chief executive of the Charity Commission will write to the hon. Member and a copy of his reply will be placed in the Library.

School Exclusions

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many (a) children, (b) children with special educational needs but no statement and (c) children with statemented special educational needs were permanently excluded (i) from mainstream schools, (ii) from special schools, (iii) while on a dual placement scheme, (iv) while on a school action plan, (v) while on early years action plan, (vi) while on school action plus, (vii) while on early years action plus and (viii) while attending a pupil referral unit in each year from 1997 to 2006. (117705)

[holding answer 30 January 2007]: The available information relating to permanent exclusions from maintained primary, secondary and all special schools is given in the table.

There are quality issues with data on permanent exclusions from maintained primary, secondary and special schools. A significant number of schools are known to have under-reported the situation. The Department has carried out checking exercises in each year to confirm the overall number of permanent exclusions. However, this only confirmed the number of exclusions in each local authority area and did not include information on the characteristics of the excluded pupil, for example whether or not they have special educational needs. Figures provided in the first table are as reported by schools and are known to be incomplete.

The range of indicators collected on excluded pupils does not include whether they were on dual placement.

Figures provided here refer to the cases of exclusion, rather than the number of pupils excluded as some pupils were excluded more than once during the year.

Maintained primary, secondary and all special schools1,2: number of permanent exclusions by special educational needs (SEN) 1997-98 to 2004-053—England

Maintained primary and secondary schools

All special schools

Number of permanent exclusions

Percentage of school population4

Number of permanent exclusions

Percentage of school population4

1997-98

Pupils with statements of SEN

1,700

1.21

550

0.60

Pupils with SEN without statement and pupils with no SEN

10,030

0.14

20

0.35

Total pupils

11,730

0.16

570

0.58

1998-99

Pupils with statements of SEN

1,530

1.04

390

0.43

Pupils with SEN without statement and pupils with no SEN

8,460

0.11

40

0.72

Total pupils

10,000

0.13

440

0.45

1999-2000

Pupils with statements of SEN

1,140

0.75

360

0.39

Pupils with SEN without statements and pupils with no SEN

6,800

0.09

30

0.57

Total pupils

7,940

0.10

380

0.40

2000-013,5

Pupils with statements of SEN

540

0.35

n/a

n/a

Pupils with SEN without statements and pupils with no SEN

7,800

0.11

n/a

n/a

Total pupils

8,330

0.11

390

0.41

2001-023

Pupils with statements of SEN

760

0.51

280

0.31

Pupils with SEN without statements and pupils with no SEN6

7,640

0.10

40

0.93

Of which:

Pupils with no SEN

3,350

0.05

40

0.95

Pupils with SEN without statements6

4,290

0.32

*

*

Total pupils

8,400

0.11

320

0.34

2002-033

Pupils with statements of SEN

680

0.45

250

0.28

Pupils with SEN without statements and pupils with no SEN6

7,190

0.09

20

0.49

Of which:

Pupils with no SEN

2,720

0.04

10

0.98

Pupils with SEN without statements6

4,470

0.40

*

Total pupils

7,870

0.10

270

0.29

2003-043

Pupils with statements of SEN

720

0.48

230

0.25

Pupils with SEN without statements and pupils with no SEN6

8,130

0.11

30

0.99

Of which:

Pupils with no SEN

3,300

0.05

30

3.18

Pupils at School Action

1,710

0.22

0

0.00

Pupils at School Action Plus

3,130

0.89

*

*

Total pupils7

8,850

0.12

260

0.28

2004-053

Pupils with statements of SEN

570

0.40

210

0.23

Pupils with SEN without statements and pupils with no SEN6

7,700

0.10

50

2.01

Of which:

Pupils with no SEN

3.520

0.06

40

10.23

Pupils at School Action

1,580

0.20

0

0.00

Pupils at School Action Plus

2,600

0.71

*

*

Total Pupils7

8.270

0.11

250

0.28

* Less than five exclusions, or a rate based on less than five exclusions.

n/a = Not available (due to quality concerns with the data).

1 Includes middle schools as deemed.

2 Includes both maintained and non-maintained special schools.

3 From 2000-01 onwards there are quality issues with permanent exclusions data. Schools are known to have under-reported the situation. The Department has carried out checking exercises to confirm the overall number of permanent exclusions in each local authority area but this did not extend to the characteristics of excluded pupils (such as SEN). Figures shown here are as reported by schools and are un-confirmed. Caution is recommended when interpreting this output.

4 The number of excluded pupils by SEN expressed as a percentage of the school population supported by same SEN provision (excluding dually registered pupils).

5 The SEN data reported by special schools for excluded pupils in 2000/01 is not sufficiently reliable or robust to be included here.

6 The introduction of the new code of practice means that the number of children with SEN without statements reported in 2000-01 and later are not directly comparable with earlier years.

7 Totals include those exclusions for which SEN (if any) was not known.

Note:

Numbers have been rounded to the nearest 10.

Source:

Schools Census

The first year for which information on exclusions from pupil referral units is available is the 2003-04 academic year. The available information is given in the table.

Pupil referral units: number of permanent exclusions by special educational needs (SEN) 2003-04 and 2004-05—England

Number of permanent exclusions1

Percentage of school population2

2003-04

Pupils with statements of SEN3

10

0.26

Pupils with SEN without statements and pupils with no SEN3

30

0.34

Of which:

Pupils with no SEN3

20

0.93

Pupils with SEN without statements3

10

17

Total pupils4

30

0.26

2004-05

Pupils with statements of SEN3

10

0.40

Pupils with EN without statements and pupils with no SEN3

30

0.35

Of which:

Pupils with no SEN5

20

0.57

Pupils with SEN without statements 6

20

0.26

Total pupils4

40

0.28

1 The number of permanent exclusions from Pupil Referral Units is derived from Termly Exclusions Survey returns.

2 The number of pupils In Pupil Referral Units by stag of SEN (to derive the percentage of school population) is sourced from Schools Census returns.

3 The school population number includes pupils with sole registration only.

4 The school population number includes those pupils with sole registration and pupil with other providers.

Note:

Numbers have been rounded to the nearest 10.

Source:

Termly Exclusions Survey and Schools Census

Schools: Accidents

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) how many legal actions were brought against local and Central Government authorities as a consequence of accidents in schools in each year since 1997; (133861)

(2) how many legal actions brought against local and Central Government authorities as a consequence of accidents in schools involved (a) under-16s and (b) under-18s in the last 12 months.

We are not aware of any such actions against this Department. The Government do not collect figures on the number of actions brought against local authorities on accidents in schools, by age or otherwise. Insurers have told Parliament that claims for personal injury in schools are a very small proportion of all such claims to local authorities. Criminal prosecution of a school employer is even rarer.

Schools: Crimes of Violence

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many teachers experienced physical abuse in their workplace in 2006. (126074)

The number of assaults on school staff is not collected centrally.

For the academic year 2004/05, information is available on the reasons for pupil exclusions. These reasons include ‘physical assault against an adult’.

A local authority breakdown of the number of pupils who have been excluded from school (permanently or for a fixed period) for physical assault against an adult, together with total numbers of exclusions, is given in the following tables.

Maintained primary, secondary and special schools1,2: permanent and fixed period exclusions for physical assault against an adult and total number of exclusions (all reasons)3 numbers and rates per 1,000 pupils 2004/05—by local authority area

Permanent exclusions

Exclusions for physical assault against an adult

All permanent exclusions

Number of pupils on roll4

Number

Exclusions per 1,000 pupils5

Number

Exclusions per 1,000 pupils5

England6,7

7,606,040

1,270

0.17

9,400

1.24

North East6

398,660

90

0.23

460

1.16

841

Darlington

15,404

*

*

34

2.21

840

Durham

75,863

16

0.21

91

1.20

390

Gateshead

28,840

9

0.31

32

1.11

805

Hartlepool

16,035

*

*

22

1.37

806

Middlesbrough

20,165

8

0.40

19

0.94

391

Newcastle upon Tyne

37,260

17

0.46

62

1.66

392

North Tyneside

30,600

4

0.13

27

0.88

929

Northumberland

50,547

9

0.18

72

1.42

807

Redcar and Cleveland

24,083

4

0.17

24

1.00

393

South Tyneside

23,762

12

0.51

44

1.85

808

Stockton-on-Tees

30,857

8

0.26

21

0.68

394

Sunderland

45,241

3

0.07

15

0.33

North West6

1,086,590

240

0.22

1,440

1.33

889

Blackburn with Darwen

24,603

3

0.12

30

1.22

890

Blackpool

21,190

9

0.42

59

2.78

350

Bolton

45,797

6

0.13

62

1.35

351

Bury

28,254

*

*

33

1.17

875

Cheshire

104,163

30

0.29

170

1.63

909

Cumbria

76,831

11

0.14

64

0.83

876

Halton

18.910

*

*

45

2.38

340

Knowsley

26,438

6

0.30

37

1.40

888

Lancashire

173,101

63

0.36

273

1.58

341

Liverpool

73,239

*

*

80

1.09

352

Manchester

65,644

27

0.41

84

1.28

353

Oldham

40,513

7

0.17

39

0.96

354

Rochdale

34,820

4

0.11

39

1.12

355

Salford

32,960

16

0.49

86

2.61

343

Sefton

45,132

5

0.11

33

0.73

342

St. Helens

28,272

0

0.00

4

0.14

356

Stockport

40,944

9

0.22

49

1.20

357

Tameside

36,731

12

0.33

63

1.72

358

Trafford

35,964

*

*

17

0.47

877

Warrington

32,137

6

0.19

45

1.40

359

Wigan

48.712

12

0.25

69

1.42

344

Wirral

52,231

*

*

63

1.21

Yorkshire and the Humber6

806,660

150

0.19

840

1.04

370

Barnsley

34.496

*

*

4

0.12

380

Bradford

86,686

7

0.08

61

0.70

381

Calderdale

34,765

4

0.12

46

1.32

371

Don caster

50,302

17

0.34

91

1.81

811

East Riding of Yorkshire

50,036

6

0.12

30

0.60

810

Kingston Upon Hull, City of

39,262

34

0.87

84

2.14

382

Kirklees

63,113

8

0.13

60

0.95

383

Leeds

111,538

24

0.22

120

1.08

812

North East Lincolnshire

26,023

4

0.15

62

2.38

813

North Lincolnshire

25,047

0

0.00

0

0.00

815

North Yorkshire

88.139

9

0.10

62

0.70

372

Rotherham

45,113

7

0.16

27

0.60

373

Sheffield

75,753

16

0.21

97

1.28

384

Wakefield

52,231

4

0.08

50

0.96

816

York

24,159

5

0.21

42

1.74

East Midlands6

667,600

160

0.24

970

1.46

831

Derby

37,832

14

0.37

85

2.25

830

Derbyshire

115,455

19

0.16

136

1.18

856

Leicester

47.168

22

0.47

79

1.67

855

Leicestershire

96.577

20

0.21

133

1.38

925

Lincolnshire

102,884

20

0.19

182

1.77

928

Northamptonshire

103,694

34

0.33

138

1.33

892

Nottingham

38.195

16

0.42

73

1.91

891

Nottinghamshire

120,891

18

0.15

147

1.22

857

Rutland

4.907

0

0.00

0

0.00

West Midlands6

864,790

120

0.14

1,060

1.22

330

Birmingham

175.226

37

0.21

364

2.08

331

Coventry

49,307

*

*

6

0.12

332

Dudley

50,251

7

0.14

91

1.81

884

Herefordshire

24,005

7

0.29

27

1.12

333

Sandwell

50.581

4

0.08

68

1.34

893

Shropshire

40,761

5

0.12

35

0.86

334

Solihull

36,360

7

0.19

57

1.57

860

Staffordshire

128,800

20

0.16

144

1.12

861

Stoke-on-Trent

36,594

3

0.08

13

0.36

894

Telford and Wrekin

26,491

10

0.38

39

1.47

335

Walsall

48,005

5

0.10

25

0.52

937

Warwickshire

76,698

10

0.13

146

1.90

336

Wolverhampton

40.675

*

*

18

0.44

885

Worcestershire

81,031

*

*

26

0.32

East of England6

842,380

110

0.13

930

1.11

820

Bedfordshire

63,800

11

0.17

126

1.97

873

Cambridgeshire

77,582

*

*

5

0.06

881

Essex

201,078

45

0.22

203

1.01

919

Hertfordshire

174,931

12

0.07

237

1.35

821

Luton

31,075

5

0.16

31

1.00

926

Norfolk

113,477

5

0.04

96

0.85

874

Peterborough

28,680

*

*

30

1.05

882

Southend-on-Sea

27,270

5

0.18

37

1.36

935

Suffolk

101,555

20

0.20

148

1.46

883

Thurrock

22,936

4

0.17

20

0.87

London6,7

1,060,180

160

0.15

1,510

1.43

Inner London6,7

360,840

60

0.17

420

1.18

202

Camden

21,565

3

0.14

14

0.65

201

City of London7

224

n/a

n/a

*

*

204

Hackney

25,572

5

0.20

28

1.09

205

Hammersmith and Fulham

17,102

*

*

15

0.88

309

Haringey

33,565

7

0.21

28

0.83

206

Islington

22.694

4

0.18

9

0.40

207

Kensington and Chelsea

10,664

5

0.47

17

1.59

208

Lambeth

28,220

0

0.00

41

1.45

209

Lewisham

34,117

*

*

23

0.67

316

Newham

48,646

10

0.21

84

1.73

210

Southwark

33,760

6

0.18

36

1.07

211

Tower Hamlets

36,728

7

0.19

41

1.12

212

Wandsworth

28,286

4

0.14

53

1.87

213

Westminster

19,693

3

0.15

34

1.73

Outer London6,7

699,350

100

0.14

1,090

1.56

301

Barking and Dagenham

31,005

13

0.42

45

1.45

302

Barnet

45,939

12

0.26

57

1.24

303

Bexley

39,513

5

0.13

62

1.57

304

Brent

39,396

15

0.38

85

2.16

305

Bromley

46,894

*

*

56

1.19

306

Croydon

49,099

4

0.08

102

2.08

307

Ealing

41,644

7

0.17

79

1.90

308

Enfield

49,670

*

*

62

1.25

203

Greenwich

36,303

19

0.52

110

3.03

310

Harrow

28,772

3

0.10

51

1.77

311

Havering

36.568

4

0.11

40

1.09

312

Hillingdon

42,027

4

0.10

57

1.36

313

Hounslow

35,840

0

0.00

77

2.15

314

Kingston upon Thames

21.431

*

*

6

0.28

315

Merton

23,547

4

0.17

33

1.40

317

Redbridge

44.622

5

0.11

60

1.34

318

Richmond upon Thames

20,108

0

0.00

22

1.09

319

Sutton

31,277

*

*

26

0.83

320

Waltham Forest (7)

35.692

n/a

n/a

60

1.68

South East6

1,161,570

160

0.14

1,400

1.20

867

Bracknell Forest

15,119

*

*

43

2.84

846

Brighton and Hove

29,961

11

0.37

37

1.23

825

Buckinghamshire

75,866

4

0.05

46

0.61

845

East Sussex

66.612

16

0.24

110

1.65

850

Hampshire

173,289

17

0.10

162

0.93

921

Isle of Wight

19.586

*

*

8

0.41

886

Kent

212,811

25

0.12

356

1.67

887

Medway

43,998

7

0.16

54

1.23

826

Milton Keynes

36,186

6

0.17

50

1.38

931

Oxfordshire

85,281

6

0.07

35

0.41

851

Portsmouth

24,722

6

0.24

20

0.81

870

Reading

16,522

7

0.42

27

1.63

871

Slough

20,274

*

*

10

0.49

852

Southampton

28,576

9

0.31

31

1.08

936

Surrey

140,069

19

0.14

154

1.10

869

West Berkshire

24.626

3

0.12

31

1.26

938

West Sussex

105,642

12

0.11

159

1.51

868

Windsor and Maidenhead

18,984

*

*

31

1.63

872

Wokingham

23,444

5

0.21

35

1.49

South West6

717,610

70

0.10

780

1.09

800

Bath and North East Somerset

25,161

*

*

40

1.59

837

Bournemouth

20,891

*

*

23

1.10

801

Bristol, City of

46,702

*

*

51

1.09

908

Cornwall

73,227

4

0.05

118

1.61

878

Devon

97,698

4

0.04

64

0.66

835

Dorset

55,849

5

0.09

46

0.82

916

Gloucestershire

85,937

12

0.14

90

1.05

420

Isles of Scilly

251

0

0.00

0

0.00

802

North Somerset

28,141

*

*

17

0.60

879

Plymouth

39.243

7

0.18

43

1.10

836

Poole

19,305

*

*

20

1.04

933

Somerset

71.328

12

0.17

72

1.01

803

South Gloucestershire

39,981

3

0.08

68

1.70

866

Swindon

28,735

6

0.21

28

0.97

880

Torbay

19,625

*

*

14

0.71

865

Wiltshire

65,540

11

0.17

87

1.33

Fixed period exclusions

Exclusions for physical assault against an adult

All fixed period exclusions

Number of pupils on roll4

Number

Exclusions per 1,000 pupils5

Number

Exclusions per 1,000 pupils5

England6,7

7,606,040

18,480

2.43

389,560

51.22

North East6

398,660

830

2.08

17,580

44.09

841

Darlington

15.404

78

5.06

1,425

92.51

840

Durham

75,863

145

1.91

4,804

63.32

390

Gateshead

28,840

41

1.42

712

24.69

805

Hartlepool

16,035

10

0.62

591

36.86

806

Middlesbrough

20.165

37

1.83

732

36.30

391

Newcastle upon Tyne

37,260

106

2.84

1,928

51.74

392

North Tyneside

30.600

50

1.63

758

24.77

929

Northumberland

50,547

98

1.94

2,448

48.43

807

Redcar and Cleveland

24.083

44

1.63

877

36.42

393

South Tyneside

23,762

49

2.06

1,067

44.90

808

Stockton-on-Tees

30,857

120

3.89

1,051

34.06

394

Sunderland

45,241

54

1.19

1,183

26.15

North West6

1,086,590

2,700

2.48

56,720

52.20

889

Blackburn with Darwen

24,603

108

4.39

1.395

56.70

890

Blackpool

21,190

63

2.97

1,436

67.77

350

Bolton

45,797

133

2.90

2,997

65.44

351

Bury

28,254

68

2.41

1.776

62.86

875

Cheshire

104,163

249

2.39

8,272

60.21

909

Cumbria

76,831

139

1.81

5,458

71.04

876

Halton

18,910

27

1.43

565

29.88

340

Knowsley

26,438

110

4.16

1.025

38.77

888

Lancashire

173,101

476

2.75

9,483

54.78

341

Liverpool

73,239

95

1.30

1,829

24.97

352

Manchester

65,644

358

5.45

4,416

67.27

353

Oldham

40,513

91

2.25

2,639

65.14

354

Rochdale

34,820

87

2.50

1,782

51.18

355

Salford

32,960

102

3.09

1,979

60.04

343

Sefton

45.132

27

0.60

539

11.94

342

St. Helens

28,272

42

1.49

1,412

49.94

356

Stockport

40,944

102

2.49

2,349

57.37

357

Tameside

36,731

107

2.91

2,420

65.88

358

Trafford

35,964

50

1.39

1.256

34.92

877

Warrington

32,137

74

2.30

2,066

64.29

359

Wigan

48.712

174

3.57

2,582

53.01

344

Wirral

52,231

22

0.42

1,040

19.91

Yorkshire and the Humber6

806,660

2,340

2.90

47,650

59.07

370

Barnsley

34,496

71

2.06

1,429

41.43

380

Bradford

86,686

236

2.72

4,095

47.24

381

Calderdale

34,765

91

2.62

1,663

47.84

371

Don caster

50,302

149

2.96

3,087

61.37

811

East Riding of Yorkshire

50,036

100

2.00

2,550

50.96

810

Kingston Upon Hull, City of

39,262

288

7.34

3,105

79.08

382

Kirklees

63,113

197

3.12

3,781

59.91

383

Leeds

111,538

368

3.30

7.610

68.23

812

North East Lincolnshire

26,023

99

3.80

2,310

88.77

813

North Lincolnshire

25,047

71

2.83

1,936

77.29

815

North Yorkshire

88.139

164

1.86

3,609

40.95

372

Rotherham

45,113

164

3.64

2,223

49.28

373

Sheffield

75,753

157

2.07

5,094

67.24

384

Wakefield

52,231

138

2.64

3,796

72.68

816

York

24,159

48

1.99

1,356

56.21

East Midlands6

667,600

1,790

2.68

34,610

51.84

831

Derby

37,832

99

2.62

2.595

68.59

830

Derbyshire

115,455

226

1.96

5,003

43.33

856

Leicester

47,168

108

2.29

3,028

64.20

855

Leicestershire

96,577

167

1.73

4.084

42.29

925

Lincolnshire

102,884

257

2.50

4,468

43.43

928

Northamptonshire

103.694

381

3.67

6,277

60.53

892

Nottingham

38,195

241

6.31

2.264

59.27

891

Nottinghamshire

120,891

300

2.48

6,728

55.65

857

Rutland

4,907

9

1.83

159

32.40

West Midlands6

864,790

2,170

2.51

41,210

47.66

330

Birmingham

175,226

505

2.88

8,304

47.39

331

Coventry

49,307

142

2.88

1,474

29.89

332

Dudley

50.251

66

1.31

2.838

58.48

884

Herefordshire

24.005

62

2.58

1,503

62.61

333

Sandwell

50,581

120

2.37

2,167

42.84

893

Shropshire

40,761

93

2.28

2,231

54.73

334

Solihull

36,360

70

1.93

1.683

46.29

860

Staffordshire

128,800

172

1.34

5,702

44.27

861

Stoke-on-Trent

36,594

136

3.72

2.409

65.83

894

Telford and Wrekin

26,491

284

10.72

2,319

87.54

335

Walsall

48,005

127

2.65

2,765

57.60

937

Warwickshire

76,698

119

1.55

3,022

39.40

336

Wolverhampton

40,675

55

1.35

1,263

31.05

885

Worcestershire

81,031

221

2.73

3,533

43.60

East of England6

842,380

1,650

1.96

40,860

48.51

820

Bedfordshire

63,800

115

1.80

2,519

39.48

873

Cambridgeshire

77,582

89

1.15

2,507

32.31

881

Essex

201,078

472

2.35

12,213

60.74

919

Hertfordshire

174,931

249

1.42

6,731

38.48

821

Luton

31.075

72

2.32

1,247

40.13

926

Norfolk

113,477

177

1.56

5,615

49.48

874

Peterborough

28,680

54

1.88

1,487

51.85

882

Southend-on-Sea

27,270

132

4.84

1.483

54.38

935

Suffolk

101.555

214

2.11

5,307

52.26

883

Thurrock

22,936

71

3.10

1,751

76.34

London6,7

1,060,180

2,490

2.35

42,850

40.41

Inner London6,7

360,840

1,110

3.08

14,110

39.09

202

Camden

21,565

69

3.20

1,017

47.16

201

City of London7

224

0

0.00

__

204

Hackney

25,572

143

5.59

1.244

48.65

205

Hammersmith and Fulham

17,102

55

3.22

809

47.30

309

Haringey

33,565

121

3.60

1,647

49.07

206

Islington

22,694

87

3.83

526

23.18

207

Kensington and Chelsea

10.664

25

2.34

341

31.98

208

Lambeth

28,220

34

1.20

1,092

38.70

209

Lewisham

34,117

103

3.02

1,313

38.49

316

Newham

48,646

39

0.80

1,138

23.39

210

Southwark

33,760

119

3.52

1,235

36.58

211

Tower Hamlets

36,728

100

2.72

1,255

34.17

212

Wandsworth

28,286

157

5.55

1,575

55.68

213

Westminster

19,693

61

3.10

913

46.36

Outer London6,7

699,350

1,370

1.96

28,740

41.09

301

Barking and Dagenham

31.005

79

2.55

824

26.58

302

Barnet

45,939

86

1.87

1,494

32.52

303

Bexley

39,513

53

1.34

1,715

43.40

304

Brent

39,396

108

2.74

1,863

47.29

305

Bromley

46.894

40

0.85

1.954

41.67

306

Croydon

49,099

94

1.91

1,307

26.62

307

Ealing

41,644

68

1.63

2,003

48.10

308

Enfield

49.670

110

2.21

2,053

41.33

203

Greenwich

36,303

227

6.25

2,745

75.61

310

Harrow

28,772

47

1.63

1,090

37.88

311

Havering

36,568

44

1.20

1,824

49.88

312

Hillingdon

42,027

65

1.55

1,135

27.01

313

Hounslow

35,840

0

0.00

1,271

35.46

314

Kingston upon Thames

21,431

15

0.70

704

32.85

315

Merton

23.547

77

3.27

1.278

54.27

317

Redbridge

44,622

29

0.65

445

9.97

318

Richmond upon Thames

20.108

22

1.09

904

44.96

319

Sutton

31.277

43

1.37

1,441

46.07

320

Waltham Forest (7)

35,692

167

4.68

2,689

75.34

South East6

1,161,570

2,810

2.42

67,820

58.39

867

Bracknell Forest

15.119

18

1.19

672

44.45

846

Brighton and Hove

29,961

147

4.91

2,206

73.63

825

Buckinghamshire

75,866

123

1.62

2,409

31.75

845

East Sussex

66,612

262

3.93

5,937

89.13

850

Hampshire

173,289

449

2.59

11,727

67.67

921

Isle of Wight

19,586

47

2.40

1,008

51.47

886

Kent

212,811

353

1.66

11.895

55.89

887

Medway

43.998

139

3.16

2,830

64.32

826

Milton Keynes

36,186

32

0.88

1,136

31.39

931

Oxfordshire

85,281

221

2.59

4.305

50.48

851

Portsmouth

24,722

209

8.45

2,982

120.62

870

Reading

16,522

69

4.18

1,046

63.31

871

Slough

20.274

32

1.58

537

26.49

852

Southampton

28,576

159

5.56

2,869

101.10

936

Surrey

140,069

210

1.50

7.114

50.79

869

West Berkshire

24.626

38

1.54

1,578

64.08

938

West Sussex

105,642

228

2.16

5,800

54.90

868

Windsor and Maidenhead

18,984

20

1.05

701

36.93

872

Wokingham

23,444

49

2.09

1.047

44.66

South West6

717,610

1,710

2.38

40,280

56.13

800

Bath and North East Somerset

25,161

40

1.59

1,804

71.70

837

Bournemouth

20,891

45

2.15

1,116

53.42

801

Bristol, City of

46,702

297

6.36

5,609

120.10

908

Cornwall

73,227

85

1.16

3,161

43.17

878

Devon

97,698

201

2.06

5,678

58.12

835

Dorset

55,849

39

0.70

1,684

30.15

916

Gloucestershire

85.937

123

1.43

3,487

40.58

420

Isles of Scilly

251

0

0.00

0

0.00

802

North Somerset

28,141

94

3.34

1,441

51.21

879

Plymouth

39,243

96

2.45

1,392

35.47

836

Poole

19,305

69

3.57

1,335

69.15

933

Somerset

71,328

206

2.89

4,308

60.40

803

South Gloucestershire

39,981

67

1.68

2,357

58.95

866

Swindon

28,735

143

4.98

2,185

76.04

880

Torbay

19,625

79

4.03

970

49.43

865

Wiltshire

65,540

126

1.92

3,753

57.26

* = Less than three, or a rate based on less than three.

‘—’ = Less than five, or a rate based on less than five.

n/a = Not available.

1 Includes middle schools as deemed.

2 Includes maintained special schools, excludes non-maintained special schools.

3 The distribution of exclusions by reason has been derived from the Termly Exclusions survey and applied to the number of permanent exclusions as confirmed by local authorities as part of the school census checking exercise.

4 The number (headcount) of all pupils (excluding dually registered pupils) in January 2005.

5 The number of exclusions in 2004/05 divided by how many thousands of pupils were on roll in January 2005.

6 National and regional totals have been rounded to the nearest 10. Totals as shown may not equal the sum of constituent parts.

7 The reasons for permanent exclusions are not available for Waltham Forest and City of London.

Source:

School Census and Termly Exclusions Survey

Schools: Nottinghamshire

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills which 10 schools in Nottinghamshire have the highest percentage of Gypsy and Traveller children on their rolls. (133016)

[holding answer 20 April 2007]: The information requested is shown in the tables.

The figures for Travellers of Irish heritage and Gypsy/Roma children need to be interpreted with caution due to the small numbers recorded.

10 schools which have the highest percentage of pupils who are classified as Gypsy/Roma ethnic origin1,2—January 2006—Nottinghamshire

URN

LA number

Estab. number

School name

Number of pupils classified as Gypsy/Roma ethnic origin

Percentage of pupils classified as Gypsy/Roma ethnic origin3

122747

891

3040

Mount CofE Primary and Nursery School

44

32.6

122822

891

3770

St. Joseph’s Catholic Primary and Nursery School

21

13.6

122771

891

3145

Walesby CofE Primary School

14

8.9

122737

891

2933

Ryton Park Primary School

11

5.1

132784

891

3292

Bowbridge Primary School

12

3.6

122611

891

2673

Manners Sutton Primary School

*

*

122593

891

2526

Hawtonville Junior School

5

1.9

131360

891

4583

Magnus CofE School

17

1.5

122595

891

2532

Lovers Lane Primary and Nursery School

*

*

122580

891

2444

Jacksdale Primary and Nursery School

3

1.2

* = Less than 3, or a rate based on less than 3.

1 Includes middle schools as deemed.

2 Pupils of compulsory school age and above were classified according to ethnic group. Excludes dually registered pupils.

3 The number of pupils by ethnic group expressed as a percentage of all pupils of compulsory school age and above.

Source:

School Census

10 schools which have the highest percentage of pupils who are classified as Traveller of Irish heritage ethnic origin1,2—January 2006—Nottinghamshire

URN

LA number

Estab. number

School name

Number of pupils classified as Traveller of Irish heritage ethnic origin

Percentage of pupils classified as Traveller of Irish heritage ethnic origin3

122645

891

2751

Queen Eleanor Primary School

3

9.4

122594

891

2527

Oliver Quibell Infant School

*

*

130996

891

7041

Newark Orchard School

*

*

133279

891

3299

Ladybrook Primary School

3

2.2

131360

891

4583

Magnus CofE School

12

1.1

122812

891

3696

The Good Shepherd Catholic Primary, Arnold

*

*

122578

891

2436

Selston Bagthorpe Primary School

*

*

122730

891

2926

Prospect Hill Junior School

*

*

122670

891

2812

Radcliffe-on-Trent Junior School

*

*

122582

891

2460

Annie Holgate Junior School

*

*

* = Less than 3, or a rate based on less than 3.

1 Includes middle schools as deemed.

2 Pupils of compulsory school age and above were classified according to ethnic group. Excludes dually registered pupils.

3 The number of pupils by ethnic group expressed as a percentage of all pupils of compulsory school age and above.

Source:

School Census

Schools: Private Finance Initiative

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what representations his Department has received from (a) schools and (b) local authorities on concerns about private finance initiative contracts with schools; and what meetings have taken place at a departmental level on this issue. (134451)

The Department works directly with schools and authorities, and also with and through a range of bodies, including HM Treasury, Partnerships UK, Partnerships for Schools and the 4ps, to understand and address the concerns that schools and authorities may have from time to time about private finance initiative contracts for schools. Our aim is to ensure that schools get from private finance initiative contracts the excellent service they deserve. Private finance initiatives were introduced for schools in 1998, and contacts with authorities, schools and with other bodies have been a part of the everyday work of the Department since then.

In 2005, we published a report which we commissioned from Partnerships UK on operational schools private finance initiative contracts, which is available at www.teachernet.gov.uk/docbank/index.cfm?id=9262. This report found that, on balance, contracts were operating successfully across most of their provision, and that there were some strong examples of good delivery. It made suggestions for improvements, all of which had already been, or subsequently were, acted upon. Further, we have worked with HM Treasury to enable Partnerships UK to act as a taskforce helpdesk for schools which have concerns or difficulties with their private finance initiative contracts. Department officials also continue to work directly with schools and authorities where needed.

In the past year, directly or through Partnerships UK and other bodies, representations have included benchmarking and market testing; support during the transition to operational status; variations to contract; dispute resolution and poor performance; availability of other schools capital funding; schools changing status while in a PFI contract. Officials also recently met the Association of Schools and College Leaders to discuss a similar range of issues.

Schools: Yorkshire

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills on how many occasions pupils at each state secondary school in Yorkshire have been excluded for having been found to be in possession of (a) a weapon and (b) narcotics on school premises in each of the last two years. (129712)

The requested information is not available.

From the academic year 2003/04, information is available on the reasons for pupil exclusions. The reason for exclusion is described by one of 12 set categories. There is no specific category relating to possession of a weapon or possession of narcotics.

A table showing the number of permanent and fixed period exclusions from each maintained secondary school in Yorkshire and the Humber region during 2003/04 and 2004/05 has been placed in the House Library.

Secondary Education: Curriculum

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills whether the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority secondary curriculum review is based (a) wholly and (b) in part on an outcome-based educational approach. (133462)

[holding answer 23 April 2007]: The purpose of all education is to achieve outcomes or results. The secondary curriculum review is based upon the need for all young people to acquire prescribed subject knowledge, skills and understanding including high level skills in literacy, numeracy and scientific understanding; to develop a knowledge of British history and an understanding of our place in the world; and to understand contemporary issues which shape the international context for the next generation.

The secondary curriculum review also seeks to provide all young people with the skills to continue to learn throughout life; to be inquisitive, independent thinkers; to be problem solvers; and team workers.

If that is what is meant by ‘an outcome-based educational approach’ then the secondary curriculum review can be said to be ‘outcome based’.

If however, ‘an outcome-based educational approach’ is defined as a curriculum which is content-free; lacking in rigour; entirely skills based; and not specific and particular about cognitive content, then that is most definitely not the approach upon which the secondary curriculum review is based.

Teachers: Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what teachers' (a) starting salary, (b) salary after seven years employment and (c) average pay was in each of the last 30 years; and what the percentage change was in each year at today's prices. (133354)

[holding answer 23 April 2007]: To derive figures for a 30-year time period for starting salaries and salaries after seven years employment would be at disproportionate cost.

The average salary figures for (a) newly qualified entrants and (b) teachers with between seven and eight years experience for both March 1997 and March 2005 (provisional), expressed in cash and real terms in 2005-06 prices, for England and Wales is shown in the following table.

Average salaries in cash and real termsMarch 1997March (provisional)Cash (£)Real (£)Cash (£)Real (£)Real terms difference (Percentage)Newly qualified entrants in England and Wales114.56018,08019,73020,10011Between 7 and 8 years experience222,52027,97032,06032,66017 1 Teachers qualifying through college based routes in England or Wales in the previous calendar year in full-time regular service the following March.2 Includes only teachers on the main and upper pay scale.Notes:1. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10.2. Real term figures based on latest GDP deflators (21 March 2007) from HMT shown in 2005-06 prices.

Average salaries are used to answer parts (a) and (b) because there are, in fact, no set salaries for those starting teaching or those with seven years' experience.

In relation to part (c), average salary figures over the last 30 years for teachers are available and are shown in the following table in both cash and real terms, with percentage year on year and cumulative changes, for England and Wales.

Year1

Average salary in cash terms2 (£)

Salaries in 2005-06 terms (£)

Yearly real terms increase/decrease (Percentage)

Cumulative real terms increase/decrease (Percentage)

1975

3,110

21,400

1976

3,960

21,710

1

1

1977

4,330

20,920

-4

-2

1978

4,560

19,370

-7

-9

1979

5,320

20,370

5

-5

1980

6,090

19,940

-2

-7

1981

7,640

21,160

6

-1

1982

8,300

21,010

-1

-2

1983

8,890

21,000

0

-2

1984

9,400

21,230

1

-1

1985

9,950

21,340

1

0

1986

11,020

22,410

5

5

1987

12,860

25,340

13

18

1988

14,640

27,310

8

28

1989

14,380

25,080

-8

17

1990

15,520

25,260

1

18

1991

17,140

25,860

2

21

1992

19,230

27,350

6

28

1993

20,750

28,590

5

34

1994

20,970

28,160

-2

32

1995

20,510

27,130

-4

27

1996

20,990

26,940

-1

26

1997

21,670

26,910

0

26

1998

22,210

26,800

0

25

1999

23,080

27,160

1

27

2000

23,980

27,660

2

29

2001

25,540

29,050

5

36

2002

26,880

29,870

3

40

2003

28,500

30,720

3

44

2004

29,590

30,970

1

45

20051

30,590

31,160

1

46

1 Data from March that year.

2 Excludes those in leadership/head teacher positions and particular grades outside of the main and upper pay scales in the years where this is appropriate.

3 Provisional.

Notes:

1. Figures are rounded to the nearest £10.

2. Real terms figures based on latest GDP deflators (21 March 2007) from HMT shown in 2005-06 prices.

Textbooks: ICT

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what resources he (a) has made and (b) plans to make available to increase the number of required school textbooks available in an electronic format. (133830)

The Department does not require schools to use particular textbooks and teachers typically use a range of different resources to support delivery of the curriculum. The electronic availability of commonly used textbooks is a matter for publishers.

Health

Cancer: Waiting Lists

To ask the Secretary of State for Health in what percentage of cases her Department's (a) 31 and (b) 62 day waiting time targets for cancer diagnosis, referral and treatment were met by each hospital in London in the last period for which figures are available. (132330)

The information requested can be found in the following tables. The figures are taken from the period 2006-07.

2005-06 Q2 31day diagnosis-treatment (all cancers)

SHA

Quarter

Year

Trust code

Trust

Referral via 2WW

Referral via other

Treat <31

Treat 32 to 38

Treat 39 to 48

Treat 49

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAL

Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust

39

232

271

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAN

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust

6

25

31

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAP

North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

34

101

135

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAS

The Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust

39

126

165

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAX

Kingston Hospital NHS Trust

73

108

180

1

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RC3

Ealing Hospital NHS Trust

22

53

75

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RF4

Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust

239

290

529

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RFW

West Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

24

66

90

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RG2

Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust

94

108

202

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RG3

Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust

66

108

174

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RGC

Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust

64

114

178

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RGZ

Queen Mary's Sidcup NHS Trust

25

55

80

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ1

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

199

378

574

1

2

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ2

The Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust

24

37

61

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ5

St Mary's NHS Trust

41

104

145

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ6

Mayday Healthcare NHS Trust

77

93

168

1

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ7

St George's Healthcare NHS Trust

127

244

371

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJZ

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

54

180

233

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RKE

The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

42

54

96

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RNH

Newham University Hospital NHS Trust

26

43

69

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RNJ

Barts and the London NHS Trust

95

240

335

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RP4

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust

0

27

27

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RP6

Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

0

13

11

1

1

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RPY

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

144

304

447

1

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RQM

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

16

56

72

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RQN

Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust

92

275

365

1

1

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RQX

Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

21

39

60

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RRV

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

49

281

330

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RT3

Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust

15

55

70

0

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RV8

North West London Hospitals NHS Trust

76

213

287

1

0

1

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RVL

Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust

101

220

320

1

0

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RVR

Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust

97

174

271

0

0

0

SHA

Quarter

Year

Trust code

Trust

Treat 63

Treat 77

Treat 91

Treat 10

Total treated

Performance (Percentage)

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAL

Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

271

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAN

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

31

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAP

North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

135

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAS

The Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

165

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAX

Kingston Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

181

99.4

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RC3

Ealing Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

75

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RF4

Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

529

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RFW

West Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

90

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RG2

Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

202

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RG3

Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

174

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RGC

Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

178

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RGZ

Queen Mary's Sidcup NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

80

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ1

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

0

0

0

0

577

99.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ2

The Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

61

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ5

St Mary's NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

145

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ6

Mayday Healthcare NHS Trust

1

0

0

0

170

98.8

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ7

St George's Healthcare NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

371

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJZ

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

1

0

0

0

234

99.6

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RKE

The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

96

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RNH

Newham University Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

69

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RNJ

Barts and the London NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

335

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RP4

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

27

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RP6

Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

0

0

0

0

13

84.6

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RPY

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

0

0

0

0

448

99.8

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RQM

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

0

0

0

0

72

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RQN

Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

367

99.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RQX

Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

0

0

0

0

60

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RRV

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

0

0

0

0

330

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RT3

Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

70

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RV8

North West London Hospitals NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

289

99.3

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RVL

Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

321

99.7

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RVR

Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust

0

0

0

0

271

100.0

2005-06 Q2 62 referral-treatment (all cancers)

SHA

Quarter

Year

Accountable trust code

Accountable trust

31 or less

32 to 38

39 to 48

49 to 62

63 to 76

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAL

Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust

24

4.5

7

2.5

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAN

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust

0

0.5

1

2

0.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAP

North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

4

4.5

5.5

16

0.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAS

The Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust

19

9.5

6

6.5

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAX

Kingston Hospital NHS Trust

25.5

5.5

16

19.5

0.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RC3

Ealing Hospital NHS Trust

9

4.5

4

8

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RF4

Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust

83

31

48.5

85.5

0.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RFW

West Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

3.5

5

6

13

0.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RG2

Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust

36

6

16

42

1

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RG3

Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust

29.5

10

16

15.5

2.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RGC

Whipps cross University Hospital NHS Trust

27

8.5

17.5

21.5

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RGZ

Queen Mary's Sidcup NHS Trust

10.5

6

8

6.5

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ1

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

26

19

25

61.5

3.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ2

The Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust

16

3

9

12

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ5

St Mary's NHS Trust

25.5

7

2.5

9

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ6

Mayday Healthcare NHS Trust

30

15

21.5

21

2.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ7

St George's Healthcare NHS Trust

42.5

17

14.5

39

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJZ

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

17

6

9

13.5

3.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RKE

The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

20

5.5

4

12

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RNH

Newham University Hospital NHS Trust

5

2

6

13

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RNJ

Barts and the London NHS Trust

17.5

6.5

17

24

"0.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RPY

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

29

13

25

25

4

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RQM

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

7

2.5

2

5

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RQN

Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust

16.5

11.5

11.5

28.5

2

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RQX

Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

6.5

4

5.5

10.5

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RRV

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation trust

7

4.5

7.5

19.5

0.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RT3

Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust

2

0.5

2.5

3.5

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RV8

North West London Hospitals NHS Trust

30.5

13

13

24.5

0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RVL

Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust

36

12

23

35

0.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RVR

Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust

50

18.5

18.5

30

0

SHA

Quarter

Year

Trust code

Trust

77 to 90

91 to 104

105+

Total treated

<=62 days

Performance (Percentage)

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAL

Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust

0

0

0

38

38

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAN

Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

4

3.5

87.5

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAP

North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

0

1

0.5

32

30

93.8

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAS

The Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

41

41

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RAX

Kingston Hospital NHS Trust

0

1

0

68

66.5

97.8

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RC3

Ealing Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

25.5

25.5

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RF4

Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust

0

0

2

250.5

248

99.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RFW

West Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

28

27.5

98.2

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RG2

Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust

0.5

0.5

0

102

100

98.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RG3

Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust

1.5

1.5

0

76.5

71

92.8

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RGC

Whipps cross University Hospital NHS Trust

1.5

0.5

0

76.5

74.5

97.4

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RGZ

Queen Mary's Sidcup NHS Trust

0

0.5

0

31.5

31

98.4

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ1

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

2.5

2.5

0

140

131.5

93.9

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ2

The Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust

0

0

0

40

40

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ5

St Mary's NHS Trust

0

0

1.5

45.5

44

96.7

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ6

Mayday Healthcare NHS Trust

0

3

0.5

93.5

87.5

93.6

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJ7

St George's Healthcare NHS Trust

0.5

0

1.5

115

113

98.3

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RJZ

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

2.5

1

3.5

56

45.5

81.3

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RKE

The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust

1

0

1

43.5

41.5

95.4

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RNH

Newham University Hospital NHS Trust

1

0

0

27

26

96.3

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RNJ

Barts and the London NHS Trust

0.5

1.5

0

67.5

65

96.3

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RPY

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

0

1

1.5

98.5

92

93.4

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RQM

Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

0

0

0

16.5

16.5

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RQN

Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust

1

0

0

71

68

95.8

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RQX

Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

0

1

0

27.5

26.5

96.4

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RRV

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation trust

0

0

1

40

38.5

96.3

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RT3

Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust

0

0

0

8.5

8.5

100.0

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RV8

North West London Hospitals NHS Trust

0

0

1

82

81

98.8

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RVL

Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust

1

0

0.5

108

106

98.1

Q36

Q3

2006-07

RVR

Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust

0.5

0.5

0

118

117

99.2

Colorectal Cancer: Screening

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many faecal occult blood testing kits have been distributed by each hub participating in the NHS bowel cancer screening programme; how many have been returned and analysed; how many returned kits were positive; how many individuals were subsequently referred for further investigation; what the take-up rate was of individuals referred for further investigation; how many individuals subsequently underwent a colonoscopy; and how many individuals were subsequently diagnosed with bowel cancer. (130886)

There are five bowel screening programme hubs in England and their activity, as at 26 March 2007, is set out in the following table. It shows: how many invitations have been sent out to those aged 60 to 69; the screening age group, in each hub's local area; how many people aged 70 and over have self referred and opted in to the programme; how many faecal occult blood (FOB) test kits were sent out by each hub; how many of the FOB kits were returned; and how many of these gave a positive result.

Programme hubs

Invitations sent to 60 to 69s

Opt-in over 70s

Test kits sent

Returned kits

Positive results

Midlands and North West (Rugby)

77,573

2,524

71,196

39,064

767

Southern (Guildford)

20,988

311

18,775

10,402

118

London (St. Mark's)

28,579

230

25,407

8,553

199

North East (Gateshead)

21,191

338

15,883

4,992

39

Eastern (Nottingham)

1,086

3

745

77

0

Total

149,417

3,456

132,006

63,088

1,123

All individuals with a positive FOB test kit result are invited to attend a FOB test positive clinic. As of 26 March 2007, 959 people had attended a clinic. At the clinic, a screening nurse assesses the person's suitability to undergo colonoscopy. The number of colonoscopies undertaken was 664, giving a colonoscopy uptake rate of 69 per cent.

The following table shows the colonoscopies broken down by screening centre, as of 26 March 2007.

Local screening centre

Screening nurse clinic attendance

Colonoscopies

Wolverhampton

226

147

Norwich

265

237

Cheshire and Merseyside

174

120

Bolton

3

0

Gloucestershire

18

1

South Devon

92

70

Solent and West Sussex

0

0

St. Mark's, London

108

69

Inner North East London

0

0

St. George's, London

50

20

University College London

0

0

Tees

8

0

South of Tyne

12

0

Hull

3

0

Derbyshire

0

0

Total

959

664

101 cancers have so far been diagnosed, but these cannot be broken down by screening centre for patient confidentiality reasons. 342 patients were diagnosed with polyps which may have developed into cancer over time. Treating polyps has reduced their risk of bowel cancer.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what proportion of faecal occult blood testing kits distributed since implementation of the NHS bowel cancer screening programme have been returned by (a) women and (b) men. (131016)

The information requested is in the following table as at 30 March 2007.

Gender

Number of testing kits sent out

Percentage

Number of testing kits returned

Percentage

Female

64,665

50

31,997

51

Male

64,548

50

30,834

49

Total

129,213

62,831

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment has been made of the impact on capacity for colonoscopy services of the roll-out of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. (131051)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave the hon. Member for Billericay (Mr. Baron) on 16 April 2007, Official Report, column 321W.

Departments: Official Hospitality

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what measures are in place to limit the amount of money spent on alcohol for hospitality purposes by her Department. (132200)

Departmental budget managers are required to observe our code of business conduct. This states hospitality such as business meals or drinks outside of normal working hours can be provided on an appropriate scale but states particular care must be taken to ensure that the provision of alcohol is limited and reasonable.

Health Hazards: Radiation

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the estimated cost is of the decontamination of 140 Osier Crescent, London, N10. (133040)

I have been asked to reply.

This is a matter that the London borough of Haringey is pursuing with representatives of the owning company. Until a full survey is undertaken, it is not possible to give an estimate of the costs of remediation work. In the meantime, the London borough of Haringey has taken action to restrict access to the house and reassured the public that living close to the property in Osier Crescent is not a health hazard.

Health Services: Rural Areas

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the impact of the closure programmes for community hospitals in rural areas on the delivery of NHS care to rural communities. (133625)

There is no centrally co-ordinated closure programme for community hospitals in England. Proposals for changes to the way services are delivered locally are a matter for local commissioners in conjunction with local people. Primary care trusts in England are expected to take into account issues such as the impact on rural areas when making decisions about the configuration of services locally.

Health Services: South West Region

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether she has approved proposals from the South West Strategic Health Authority to rebalance NHS provision away from acute hospital care to out-of-hospital care in the community; and if she will make a statement. (133171)

Any proposals for the reconfiguration of services are a matter for the national health service locally.

There is a well established and well understood process for managing formal public consultations on proposed changes so that patients, the public and other stakeholders can help to inform the local debate.

However, our vision for providing more services in settings that are convenient for patients was set out in “Our Health, Our Care, Our Say”.

Although one of our goals is to treat people more quickly and conveniently closer to home, this should only happen where it is consistent with safety and good quality care.

Hospital Wards

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 22 January 2007, Official Report, column 1593W, on mixed-sex wards, whether she has determined a timescale for publication of the reports she received on mixed-sex wards from strategic health authorities on 11 December 2006. (131849)

No timescale has yet been decided. The information will be used as part of a comprehensive assessment of the situation, including identification of best practice examples. This will be released in due course.

Hospitals: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many vacancies were frozen in each quarter of the last five years in each hospital in London, broken down by staff department. (132334)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how much was paid by NHS trusts in asset charges for unoccupied or unused space in each hospital in London in each of the last five years; (132335)

(2) how much (a) ward, (b) public, (c) office and (d) other space is unoccupied or unused in each hospital in London.

Maternity Services: Ashurst

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the (a) financial and (b) managerial responsibilities are of (i) Hampshire Primary Care Trust and (ii) Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust with respect to implementing a new maternity unit at Ashurst; and if she will make a statement. (134093)

Any proposals for improvements to services are a matter for the national health service locally.

Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust led the formal public consultation on these proposals which are now being implemented by the trust to provide the best possible support for local women.

Medicine: Students

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what percentage change in the bursaries that (a) nursing, (b) midwifery, (c) medical, (d) dental and (e) allied health professional students received there was in each year since 1997. (131934)

Table one shows the national health service bursary rates for the basic awards, not including additional allowances, for the period 1997 to 2008 and the annual percentage increases. The majority of nurses and midwives receive the non-means tested bursary. Medical and dental students and the majority of allied health professional students receive the means-tested NHS bursary. The NHS bursary scheme has supported allied health professional students since 1998 and medical and dental undergraduate students since September 2002 from their fifth and subsequent years of study. During the first four years’ of study, medical and dental students receive support under the Department for Education and Skills regulations.

In addition to the basic NHS bursary awards there are a number of other allowances.

Basic NHS bursary rates for academic years 1997-98 to 2007-08

1997-98

1998-99

1999-2000

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

Degree

London

n/a

2,225

2,280

2,335

2,578

2,640

Elsewhere

n/a

1,810

1,855

1,900

2,098

2,148

Parental Home

n/a

1,480

1,515

1,555

l,717

1,758

Diploma

London

5,230

5,374

5,508

5,645

6,232

6,382

Elsewhere

4,450

4,572

4,686

4,805

5,305

5,432

% Increase on previous year

2.75

2.5

2.4

10.4

2.4

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Degree

London

2,703

2,768

2,837

2,908

2,976

Elsewhere

2,200

2,253

2,309

2,367

2,422

Parental Home

1,800

l,843

1,889

1,963

2,009

Diploma

London

6,535

6,692

6,859

7,030

7,194

Elsewhere

5,562

5,695

5,837

5,983

6,122

% Increase on previous year

2.4

2.4

2.5

2.5

2.33

Basic NHS bursary rates for academic 2007-08 for new students

2007-08

Degree

London

3,215

Elsewhere

2,672

Parental Home

2,231

Diploma

London

7,443

Elsewhere

6,372

Table two shows national health service bursary rates for the basic awards, not including additional allowances, for new students who commence their course on or after 1 September 2007.

Changes from September 2007 have been made to modernise the current scheme. This has allowed for the redistribution of funds to provide; an increase in the basic allowance and a new parents’ learning allowance.

Medway Maritime Hospital: Nurses

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many nurses have been made redundant at Medway Maritime Hospital since April 2005. (134649)

Redundancy data were collected centrally for the first time in 2006. There were no nurses made compulsory redundant at the Medway NHS Trust in the nine months up to 31 December 2006.

Members: Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when she expects the Minister of State to reply to the letter from the hon. Member for West Worcestershire, on Co-proximal. (134723)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when she expects the Parliamentary Under-Secretary to reply to the letter of 13 March from the hon. Member for West Worcestershire, on Osbourne Court Community Unit. (134725)

Mental Health Services: Cheltenham

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when she expects the Independent Reconfiguration Panel to report its advice to her on the referral from Gloucestershire Overview and Scrutiny Committee relating to the decision by Gloucestershire Partnership NHS Trust to centralise older people's mental health inpatient facilities at Charlton Lane, Cheltenham; and when she expects to agree and publish its terms of reference. (134888)

Mentally Ill: Life Expectancy

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the impact of severe mental health conditions on the life expectancy of patients. (132290)

The Department has not made a direct assessment of the impact of severe mental health problems on the life expectancy of patients. However, as made clear in the Choosing Health White Paper, the Government recognise that people with mental health problems tend to experience worse physical health than the rest of the population. This is why it is supporting well-being support programmes in spearhead primary care trusts and published a commissioning framework in 2006 on supporting the physical health needs of people with severe mental illness, which has been placed in the Library and is available on the Department's website at:

www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4138212

NHS: Consultants

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much was spent on management consultancy services by the NHS in the latest year for which figures are available. (131919)

Information on the costs of employing external management consultants is not collected centrally.

NHS: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which NHS organisations have been in receipt of turnaround support in each month since January 2006; and which NHS organisations have received turnaround support in the period since January 2006 but are no longer part of the turnaround programme. (131955)

The tables detail the organisations that have been part of the National Turnaround Programme between February and August 2006, between August and October 2006 and since October 2006. This information has been placed in the Library.

The following organisations have left the National Turnaround Programme since January 2006:

North Tees and Hartlepool National Health Service Trust and the Mid-Cheshire Hospital NHS Trust: by January 2007, these trusts were delivering sustained recurrent monthly run rate balance;

High Peak and Dales Primary Care Trust (PCT) and Sedgefield PCT: in the commissioning a patient-led NHS reconfiguration, from October 2006 these PCTs were consolidated into significantly larger new PCTs that did not require turnaround support; and

North Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust: became Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust in December 2006.

NHS: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many posts there were for (a) consultants, (b) registrars, (c) senior house officers and (d) house officers in London in each quarter of the last 10 years, broken down by hospital trust; and how many posts were vacant in each case. (132144)

NHS: Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when she expects to publish the NHS staff earnings survey. (131953)

Updated national health service staff earnings information is expected to be available at the end of June 2007. It will be published by the Information Centre. The exact publication date will be set during mid May, and will be available from:

www.ic.nhs.uk.

NHS: Secondment

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many secondees there were from the NHS to each central Government Department in each of the last five years; and from which NHS trusts they were seconded. (131345)

The Department only began to record all secondees into the organisation on its main Human Resources Information System during 2006-07, so historic information on numbers is not available.

As at the end of March 2007, there were 58 full-time equivalent staff seconded into the Department. We do not maintain a record of the seconding organisation.

NHS: Working Hours

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to her statement of 10 January 2007, Official Report, columns 314-15, which problems in the NHS arise from the previous Government's negotiation of the European working time directive; and how they differ from the additional problems driven by the impact of the SiMAP and Jaeger judgments. (118243)

More engagement in the working time directive negotiations from the outset would have most likely resulted in a better directive and safeguards against legal challenges such as SiMAP and Jaeger.

The retention of the opt-out and a solution to the problems caused by the SiMAP and Jaeger judgments still remain priorities for the United Kingdom, and together with many member states we continue to seek changes to the European working time directive to address the difficulties from these judgments.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 22 March 2007, Official Report, column 1141W, on NHS: working hours, what indicators of NHS readiness for fully implementing the 48-hour week for doctors in training her Department monitors; and if she will publish the results of such monitoring for the latest period for which figures are available. (131880)

The New Deal contract monitoring returns give an indication of national health service readiness for fully implementing the 48-hour week for doctors in training. Monitoring information is published on the NHS Employers website at: www.nhsemployers.org

The progress of the NHS working time directive pilots programme and research by the medical Royal Colleges also provides useful workforce information to support working time directive implementation.

Palliative Care: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 14 March 2007, Official Report, column 448W, on palliative care: finance, what the baseline year is for measuring the commitment to double spending on palliative care services; what the level of expenditure on palliative care services was in the baseline year; and by what date she intends to meet the commitment to double spending on palliative care services. (131886)

The NHS Operating Framework for 2007-08 highlighted the importance of primary care trusts (PCTs) undertaking baseline reviews of their end of life care services. We will be issuing guidance on what the reviews should cover shortly. These reviews will provide information on the current position of end of life care services in PCTs and will help support the implementation of the end of life care strategy when it is published.

As part of the end of life care strategy, the analytical and modelling working group will be examining the true cost of providing end of life care. They will aim to estimate the cost of the services provided across the board by both the national health service and the voluntary sector, both general and specialist, in the last three to six months of a patient’s life and the current expenditure on end of life care services.

This information will inform the delivery of the Government’s manifesto commitment.

Patients: Transport

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patient journeys are estimated to have taken place between Cheltenham and Gloucester in (a) 2003, (b) 2004, (c) 2005 and (d) 2006; and what the predicted numbers are for (i) 2007 and (ii) 2008. (134463)

Psychologists

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many qualified clinical psychology staff worked in the NHS in (a) England and (b) each strategic health authority in each year since 1997. (129897)

The information is shown in the table.

Number of qualified clinical psychology staff working in the national health service in England and in each strategic health authority (SHA) since 1997

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

England

4,038

4,408

4,572

5,032

5,514

6,092

6,757

7,051

7,122

North East SHA

202

223

231

275

291

323

348

349

351

North West SHA

486

551

578

614

716

835

913

1,014

982

Yorkshire and the Humber SHA

407

423

384

471

463

548

565

593

593

East Midlands SHA

277

264

270

274

351

364

388

408

422

West Midlands SHA

434

535

541

587

645

729

821

810

762

East of England SHA

217

314

323

338

352

427

499

477

530

London SHA

954

1,037

1,104

1,217

1,329

1,509

1,698

1,857

1,841

South East Coast SHA

279

309

367

414

465

451

471

455

506

South Central SHA

277

281

284

295

328

312

418

424

443

Special Health Authorities and Other Statutory Bodies

48

51

57

66

23

Source:

The Information Centre for health and social care non-medical workforce census.

Communities and Local Government

Compulsory Purchase: Liverpool

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government which of her Ministers have visited the Liverpool streets designated by her for clearance by compulsory purchase order for the Pathfinder development; and on what dates those visits took place. (133672)

On 4 October 2006 Baroness Andrews visited some of the intervention areas of the Merseyside housing market renewal pathfinder area, although not the areas included in the compulsory purchase orders approved in March 2007. Previously, in 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, a number of the Office of Deputy Prime Minister Ministers visited the Pathfinder area.

Council Housing: Property Transfer

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government which councils’ tenants voted against large scale voluntary transfer in each year since 1997. (131053)

A table listing all transfer ballots by year since 1997 has been placed in the Library of the House.

Departments: European Council

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many EU Council meetings she has attended since taking up her post; and who represents her if she is unable to attend. (133755)

The Secretary of State has not attended an EU Council meeting since taking up her post. If the Secretary of State is unable to attend, then the meeting would be delegated to her ministerial team. A member of the ministerial team would then attend, diary permitting.

Departments: Planning

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what steps are taken by her Department to include (a) older people and (b) people with disabilities in strategic planning, policy making and the delivery of the services they use. (132907)

Involvement of older and disabled people is integral to the formation of Communities and Local Government policies that affect them. Examples of recent and forthcoming consultations on my Department's policies include those on the Supporting People programme, the review of Disabled Facilities Grants, and the National Strategy for Housing in an Ageing Society. Disabled people were also consulted in the formation of my Department's disability equality scheme, which sets out what we will be doing over the next three years to improve equality of opportunity for disabled people, and has been commended by the Disability Rights Commission.

In addition, the recently published Local Government White Paper encourages local authorities to target groups and communities who may in the past have been marginalised, including older and disabled people's groups, when discharging their new duty to ‘inform, consult, involve and devolve’.

Departments: Renewable Energy

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much energy in kilowatt hours was purchased by her Department from renewable sources in the most recent year for which figures are available. (134993)

In the year 2005-061, the amount of energy purchased from renewable sources by Communities and Local Government was as follows:

Renewable energy purchased

Kilowatt hours

Headquarter buildings

12,538,297

Agencies

6,624,649

This answer does not include the buildings occupied by Government offices, who carry out functions on behalf of 10 Government Departments.

Departments are mandated to source at least 10 per cent. of electricity from renewable sources by March 2008.

Data relating to the Department’s energy consumption and its performance against all the Government estate sustainable operations targets is available in the Sustainable Development Commission’s Sustainable Development in Government (SDiG) Report 2006 found at:

http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/.

1 Figures are yet to be fully collated for 2006-07 due to electricity billing arrangements.

Equality Act 2006

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government which religious organisations she has met to discuss the Equality Act 2006; and how many such meetings she has had. (122249)

A range of meetings have been held between religious organisations and Ministers and officials about issues related to the Equality Act 2006. These have included meetings with representatives of interfaith groups, the Church of England, the Catholic Church, the Christian Institute, the Lawyers Christian Fellowship, the Evangelical Alliance, faith-based schools and adoption agencies, and Scottish religious groups.

Homebuy Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether tenants purchasing an equity stake in a property under the Social HomeBuy scheme are responsible for the entire maintenance costs of the property. (129278)

Housing association and local authority tenants purchasing a share in their rented home at a discount under the Social HomeBuy pilot scheme assume financial responsibility for all maintenance costs. The Government are currently exploring different options for tenants purchasing small shares.

Housing Revenue Accounts

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much on average local authorities in England paid back to the Exchequer from their housing revenue account in each year since 1990. (131845)

Figures for the period 1990-91 to 1993-94 can be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Details of net negative/positive housing revenue account subsidy amounts for England for the period 1994-95 to 2005-06 (the last year for which audited figures are available) have been given in the following table. In 2001, the Major Repairs Allowance was introduced to increase the resources available to local authorities to improve their housing. The figures given in the table show the housing element of HRA subsidy for 1994-95 to 2003-04 inclusive and Housing Revenue Account (HRA) subsidy for 2004-05 and 2005-06. The Local Government Act 2003 changed the way HRA Subsidy is accounted for and the figures are presented in line with current accounting practice. HRA Subsidy for 2004-05 (to date) is the precise equivalent of the housing element in prior years.

Financial year

Amounts distributed to authorities in deficit

Amounts contributed by authorities in surplus1

Net expenditure by Exchequer2

1994-95

803,583,639

-892,150,955

-88,567,316

1995-96

690,585,862

-1,077,515,215

-390,050,431

1996-97

660,265,906

-1,223,294,361

-563,028,455

1997-98

606,715,419

-1,260,563,048

-668,307,497

1998-99

538,962,811

-1,408,955,122

-869,992,311

1999-2000

484,765,377

-1,525,634,407

-1,040,869,030

2000-01

441,660,519

-1,557,991,956

-1,116,331,437

2001-02

967,053,381

-615,948,372

3351,105,009

2002-03

906,718,472

-654,659,330

252,059,142

2003-04

902,327,958

-711,409,278

191,153,240

2004-05

694,206,087

-615,328,703

78,877,384

2005-06

777,572,397

-548,013,415

229,558,982

1 Prior to 31 March 2004 no surpluses (shown as negative figures) were returned to the Exchequer. HRA Subsidy was paid as a net amount after an offset was made between the housing and rent rebate elements. These amounts were not available to authorities for expenditure on their housing stock as they represent a saving to the Exchequer.

2 Remaining surpluses after the offset (shown as negative figures) remained with the individual local authority and were transferred to their General Fund and lost to housing. This practice ended on 1 April 2004 and the resources are retained within the subsidy regime.

3 The introduction of the Major Repairs Allowance on 1 April 2001 reduced surpluses by £1.5 billion and put the national system into overall deficit with the Exchequer making up the difference.

Housing: Water Supply

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what role water companies have in the planning of housebuilding programmes; and whether consideration is being given to making them statutory consultees in the planning process. (134382)

[holding answer 27 April 2007]: Water companies are already statutory consultees on regional spatial strategies (RSSs) and local development plan documents (DPDs) since water resource issues are an important consideration in determining the pattern of development.

Under the plan-led system, planning applications are determined in accordance with the development plan (the RSS and DPDs) unless material considerations indicate otherwise.

Local Government Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much funding from Housing Revenue Account rental income each local authority in England used to pay service debt charges in 2006-07. (133362)

[holding answer 23 April 2007]: This information is not yet available; data from local authorities for 2006-07 is not due to be submitted to my Department until 31 December this year.

Mortgages: Public Sector

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what assessment she has made of the effect of red-lining on the mortgageability of public sector property; what steps she is taking to seek an end to the practice; what assessment she has made of the effect that an extended capping regime would have on the mortgageability of properties; and if she will make a statement. (134206)

No such assessments have been made. It is for individual lenders to decide, in the light of local circumstances, whether to lend on individual properties. However, the Government will not approve a lender for Right to Buy purposes under section 156 of the Housing Act 1985 if inquiries suggest that it operates a policy of not lending on certain types of property.

Overcrowding: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how the £19 million to fund innovative schemes to tackle overcrowding in London announced on 20 November 2006 has been allocated, broken down by local authority. (133603)

The following table shows the total amount for each borough in receipt of an allocation of regional housing pot funding in 2006-07 for pilot schemes to tackle overcrowding in London:

Local authority

Allocation (£)

Brent

2,150,000

Croydon

3,492,735

Greenwich

606,000

Hackney

860,000

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,000,000

Haringey

120,000

Havering

315,000

Hillingdon

825,000

Islington

760,000

Lambeth

4,280,250

Redbridge

250,000

Southwark

2,772,683

Sutton

120,000

Tower Hamlets

202,000

Westminster

1,395,000

Total

19,148,668

Right to Buy Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what plans she has to amend the Housing (Right to Buy) (Information to Secure Tenants) Order 2005 (S.I., 2005, No.1735) to include a requirement that the type of construction and any known defects associated with the type of construction should be included in the seller’s information. (134180)

There are no plans to do this. Section 125 of the Housing Act 1985 already requires social landlords to inform tenants who apply to purchase their homes under the Right to Buy scheme of any structural defect known to the landlord.

Right to Buy Scheme: Social Security Benefits

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what percentage of council tenants who exercised the right to buy were receiving (a) council tax benefit and (b) housing benefit in each of the last five years. (133780)

This information is not collected. The ability of tenants who are in receipt of benefits to exercise their right to buy would depend on the willingness of lenders to offer them mortgage finance, or the availability of financial assistance from family or friends.

Social Rented Housing

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many people, living in social housing and holding life-time tenancy in England are aged (a) 18 to 25, (b) 26 to 40, (c) 40 to 55 and (d) over 55 years. (134064)

Separate figures for those with lifetime tenancies are not available. Figures for the whole of the social rented sector are as follows:

Age of tenant

Number of households

Percentage

<26

252,000

6.8

26 to 40

898,000

24.3

41 to 55

887,000

24.1

56+

1,650,000

44.7

All

3,687,000

100.0

Source:

ONS, Labour Force Survey

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many people living in social housing hold life-time tenancy in England. (134066)

The Housing Corporation estimates that at end-March 2006 about 97 per cent. of housing association tenancies were lifetime tenancies. Equivalent figures for local authorities are not available, so an estimate of the total number of lifetime tenancies in social housing cannot be provided.

Social Rented Housing: Insurance

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will take steps to require registered social landlords to advise their tenants to take out home contents insurance. (134942)

Registered social landlords are required to provide high standards of customer care. Landlords should consider all aspects of this, including insurance. The Housing Corporation has issued good practice guidance on facilitating access to insurance called “Insurance for All” which is available on the corporation’s website.

Social Rented Housing: Unemployment

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many people living in social housing in England are (a) employed and (b) unemployed. (134054)

In England, in 2006, an estimated 1,162,000 householders in social housing were employed and 213,000 were unemployed.

The remaining householders in social housing comprised an estimated 1,195,000 retired householders and 1,084,000 householders who were inactive for some other reason.

These figures are derived from the Labour Force Survey, a continuous survey ran by the Office for National Statistics.

Temporary Accommodation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what assessment she has made of the appropriateness of placing homeless households in long-term placements in temporary accommodation outside their local authority area. (133729)

Under the homelessness legislation (part 7 of the Housing Act 1996), local housing authorities must ensure that suitable accommodation is available for housing applicants accepted as eligible for assistance, unintentionally homeless and in priority need. In some cases it may be appropriate for a homeless household to be placed in accommodation outside the local authority area but authorities are required to ensure that, so far as reasonably practicable, accommodation is secured in their district. Moreover, we have issued statutory guidance—the “Homelessness Code of Guidance for Local Authorities”—which states that wherever possible the accommodation secured should be as close as possible to where applicants were previously living, so they can retain established links with schools, doctors, social workers and other key services and support essential to the well-being of the household.