Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 463: debated on Thursday 26 July 2007

Written Answers to Questions

Thursday 26 July 2007

Defence

Aircraft Carriers

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence by what means the Fleet will be protected against aerial attack prior to the advent of the Future Aircraft Carriers. (152061)

[holding answer 25 July 2007]: The Fleet relies on a layered defence approach to defeat an aerial attack. The backbone of the Fleet's ability to defend itself from air attack in the outer layer of maritime air defence will continue to be provided by destroyers. At present, this is achieved using the Type 42 Destroyers equipped with the medium range Sea Dart surface to air missile system. Type 45 Destroyers will gradually replace the Type 42 destroyers. These new ships will be armed with the Principal Anti Air Missile System, enhancing the Fleet's capability to counter the most sophisticated aircraft and anti-ship missiles in the world.

In the inner layer of Maritime Air Defence the Fleet's close range air defence capability will continue to be provided by Type 22 and Type 23 Frigates equipped with the Seawolf point defence missile system. Additional air defence capability will also come from a combination of close-in weapon (gun) systems, such as Goalkeeper and Phalanx, and decoys.

Airborne Early Warning Sea King helicopters will provide the long range detection of airborne contacts.

Ammunition

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much his Department has spent on researching enhanced blast munitions; what orders have been made for them; and what plans there are for future procurement of the munitions. (152215)

The Ministry of Defence has current research programmes relevant to enhanced blast munitions valued at approximately £10 million, spread over more than five years. These are to investigate the underlying science and are aimed at the assessment of the threat to UK armed forces, what protection is appropriate, and the advantage of incorporation of such technology into weapons.

The MOD has one programme which incorporates enhanced blast technology, the Anti-Structures Munition (ASM), as announced by my predecessor on 6 February 2006, Official Report, column 34WS, due to enter service at the end of 2009. It will enable infantry to defeat hardened structures such as buildings or bunkers, reducing casualties to our forces while minimising collateral damage. In the interim an off the shelf system has been procured until the ASM becomes available. There are currently no plans for future procurement of enhanced blast munitions.

Armed Forces: Desertion

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many service personnel were reported as absent without leave in each (a) month and (b) year since January 2004. (152359)

The following table shows the number of Royal Navy personnel absent without leave in each month since January 2004 to June 2006.

2004

2005

2006

2007

January

13

23

19

12

February

14

28

14

10

March

18

16

19

9

April

11

16

12

5

May

12

22

14

6

June

23

20

13

15

July

12

15

5

August

11

14

11

September

17

4

13

October

26

12

15

November

20

18

13

December

7

8

9

The following table shows absence without leave statistics by calendar year from January 2004:

Navy

Army

RAF

2004

185

3,030

55

2005

195

2,715

35

2006

155

2,330

10

2007

55

1,275

15

Notes: 1. Both the Navy and the Army record AWOL statistics by the number of incidences of AWOL rather than the number of people who have gone AWOL, so there may be a number people who are represented more than once in these figures. 2. Figures are rounded to the nearest five and are as at 23 July 2007. 3. Differences in figures for individual years compared to previous answers occur because personnel may have been wrongly reported as AWOL in the first instance, or conversely they may have subsequently been found to have been AWOL and the records rectified later.

Monthly breakdowns of the figures for the Army and the Royal Air Force could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many service personnel classed as being absent without leave since 1997 have not yet been accounted for. (152360)

The numbers of personnel who have gone absent without leave from the services since 1 January 1997 and remain so are, as at 23 July 2007,

Navy: 30

Army: 1,175

RAF: 15

These figures are rounded to the nearest five. They are subject to daily changes as individuals return to their units.

There is no evidence to suggest that operational commitments or any other factors are causing a significant increase. There are a number of reasons why personnel may go AWOL but anecdotal evidence suggests that most incidents are caused by domestic circumstances, such as family problems, rather than any wish to avoid military service.

Armed Forces: Health Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the suitability of 36 Grays Lane, Headley Court for temporary service family accommodation. (152356)

The generous offer by the Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association Forces Help (SSAFA—Forces Help) to use this property in Ashtead to provide short-term accommodation for families visiting relatives who are being treated at the Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC), Headley Court is very welcome. DMRC staff have advised that the accommodation, with minor alterations to facilitate access, will be entirely suitable for the proposed purpose.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will support the Sailors, Soldiers, Airmen and Families Association in its application to the local council to make alterations to its property in Ashtead, Surrey, for armed forces' families visiting Headley Court. (152357)

As I made clear on a recent visit to Headley Court, when I opened a new ward, I am most grateful for the Sailors, Soldiers, Airmen and Families Association (SSAFA) Forces Help’s offer to provide a property for the short-term accommodation of families visiting relatives being treated there.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what steps are being taken to (a) support and (b) accommodate service families when visiting injured relatives at Headley Court. (152358)

Family visits are an integral part of the rehabilitation of injured service personnel being treated at the Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Headley Court.

The staff at Headley Court welcome such visits. The unit meets appropriate travel and subsistence costs, including overnight accommodation if it is in the patient’s interests to have their family close by. In addition to local hotels, accommodation currently available to visiting families includes Pigeon House, a four-bedroom house in the Headley Court grounds, and Dale View, a converted three-bedroom service married quarter.

Armed Forces: Human Rights

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will place in the Library a copy of the section of the transcript of the Bulford Camp court martial relating to advice on application of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention on Human Rights. (144589)

The trial in question lasted some six months and the transcript comprises approximately 15,000 pages. Evidence concerning advice on the application of the Human Rights Act and the European Convention on Human Rights was given on 8 December 2006. An electronic version of the complete trial transcript of open court sessions, including that day's evidence, will be made available in the Library of the House.

Armed Forces: Mental Health Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment his Department made of the NHS’s requirement for (a) psychologists, (b) psychiatrists, (c) mental health nurses and (d) occupational therapists in (i) 2006 and (ii) 2007. (148364)

The requirements for uniformed consultant psychiatrists and mental health nurses on 1 April 2006 and 1 April 2007 are shown as follows:

Service consultant psychiatrists

Service mental health nurses

2006

26

113

2007

28

123

Source:

DMSD quarterly manning return 1 April 2006/March 2007 PPSG.

As stated in my answer of 7 March 2007, Official Report, columns 1985-88W, the armed forces no longer employ uniformed psychologists and mental health occupational therapists, but the MOD does employ civilian clinical psychologists, psychiatrists and mental health nurses. The required numbers for these grades are not held centrally. I will write to the hon. Member with these figures once they have been collated and place a copy of my letter in the Library of the House.

Armed Forces: Temporary Accommodation

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many service families have been placed by MoDern Housing Solutions in (a) Premier Travel Inns and (b) other hotels in each year since 2005; and if he will make a statement. (150026)

The Housing Prime Contract was awarded to MoDern Housing Solutions on 14 November 2005 and was rolled out in January 2006. The number of families placed in Premier Travel Inns and other hotels since 1 January 2006 is as follows:

Premier Travel inns

Other hotels

2006

9

46

Up to 30 June 2007

7

23

Hotels are provided where service families need to be away, for a short period, from their SFA while repairs are carried out.

Army: Travel

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much was spent on travel costs for (a) members of the Army Board, (b) the Adjutant-General and (c) the Chief of the General Staff in 2006. (118181)

In 2006, the Army Board spent £463,010 on travel in total. Of this total, the Adjutant-General spent £3,783 and the Chief of General Staff spent £78,814.

These figures include accommodation costs for ministerial members of the Army Board, which cannot be separated from travel costs. Totals also contain travel costs incurred by the relevant Army Board Member and their supporting staff, where appropriate, but excludes spouses. Costs relating to military flights and use of official staff cars have not been included.

Atomic Weapons Establishment: Sales

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what safeguards the Government have put in place to ensure that (a) national security and (b) sensitive design and manufacture systems are safeguarded from foreign powers following the auction of the Government stake in the Atomic Weapons Establishment. (150724)

As indicated by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform in his written statement to the House on 16 July 2007, Official Report, column 1WS, as part of the process of the sale of British Nuclear Group's share in AWE Management Ltd (AWEML), the Government will be seeking to ensure the enduring performance of AWEML in continuing to meet the requirements of its customer, the Ministry of Defence.

Such performance covers all aspects of work at the Atomic Weapons Establishment, with particular emphasis on the protection of national security and warhead design information, which are paramount considerations. We shall be applying a strict set of criteria in order to establish the acceptability of prospective purchasers before finalising an agreed shortlist of potential bidders. All factors will be taken into account in our analysis.

Bombs

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence for what reason a direct fire capability prevents a rocket with a sub-munition capability from being defined as a cluster munition, with particular reference to the CRV-7 MPSM rocket; and if he will make a statement. (152213)

The cluster munitions of humanitarian concern are those fired in the indirect role, whereas certain sub-munition variants are direct fire weapon systems. In the direct fire role the firing crew has line of sight from the platform to the target and has a sophisticated target identification and acquisition system to aid discrimination. In seeking the balance between humanitarian concern and military necessity the UK’s definition of cluster munitions therefore excludes direct fire systems.

Departments: Legislation

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence which Bills introduced by his Department in the last five years have contained sunset clauses; and what plans he has for the future use of such clauses. (151842)

The Ministry of Defence has introduced only one Bill (which became the Armed Forces Act 2006) in the last five years that contains a time limit which may be regarded as a sunset clause. The clause continues the previous practice of making the main legislation governing the armed forces subject to a requirement for annual renewal by Order in Council approved by Parliament and for renewal by Act of Parliament every five years. This accords with the procedure which Parliament has adopted for this legislation in the past.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence which Bills introduced by his Department in the last five years did not contain sunset clauses; and if he will make a statement. (152485)

The Department has been responsible for the introduction of two Bills in the last five years which became:

The Armed Forces Pay and Compensation Act 2004

The Armed Forces Act 2006

The 2004 Act does not contain a sunset clause.

The 2006 Act contains a time limit which may be regarded as a form of sunset clause. The clause continues the previous practice of making the main legislation governing the armed forces subject to a requirement for annual renewal by Order in Council approved by Parliament and for renewal by Act of Parliament every five years.

Departments: Recruitment

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much the Department paid in fees to recruitment agencies for (a) temporary and (b) permanent staff in each year since 1997. (151673)

The information requested on how much the Department paid in fees to recruitment agencies for temporary workers and permanent staff in each year since 1997 is not held centrally. It could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Departments: Sales

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much was raised from the sale of departmental real estate for housing in each year since 1997. (149665)

The total accrued disposal receipts for each year since 1997 are published in the Defence Estates annual reports and accounts, copies of which are available in the Library of the House.

Departments: Written Questions

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will publish his Department’s guidance on answering written parliamentary questions. (152661)

Yes. I have placed a copy of the Department’s guidance on answering written parliamentary questions in the Library of the House.

Ex-servicemen: Mental Health Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what criteria have been established for assessing the success of the Community Based Mental Health Service for Veterans pilot scheme; what the cost is for (a) the national roll-out of the service and (b) the pilots; and what alternatives for the delivery of the service have been considered. (151591)

A process and outcome evaluation of the pilots over their two-year duration is an integral part of the project. The key measures, advised on by national clinical experts, will be the assessment and treatment regimes provided, and the patient (and carer) experience and outcomes.

The costs of running the pilot scheme are not yet available as negotiations for the funding of individual sites are still continuing between the MOD, the Department of Health and NHS trusts. The cost of rolling out the scheme nationwide will depend on the outcomes of the pilots.

The proposed service is advised on by clinical and health care experts and reflects the long established intention that veterans’ health care is primarily a matter for the NHS. Using NHS best practice and processes, veterans-sensitive evidence-based interventions will be delivered by public, private or charitable providers. These will be modified as necessary in the light of the pilot evaluation.

In addition, we have recently announced the expansion of our Medical Assessment Programme (MAP) based at St Thomas’ Hospital, London, to include assessment of veterans with mental health symptoms with operational service from 1982 (including veterans of the Falklands campaign). The clinician in charge is a recently retired service military psychiatrist, who will provide support and advice to GPs and other civilian health professionals where the individual is concerned that the service background of their condition may not have been understood within the NHS or where the health professional is seeking expertise on the assessment or treatment of a veteran’s condition.

Iraq-Kuwait Conflict: Gulf War Syndrome

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what recent assessment he has made of the case for establishing a public inquiry to examine illnesses resulting from the Gulf War; and if he will make a statement. (149989)

It has been the Government’s policy since 1997 to be open and transparent about Gulf veterans issues, including the publication of all relevant documents. We have identified and published the lessons of the past, accepting that mistakes were made in 1990-91, particularly with regard to medical record keeping. The Government’s view is that there are no substantive issues to be addressed by a public inquiry and that, in particular, it would not help to resolve the long outstanding issue of why veterans are ill; only scientific research might do this. We have funded a substantial programme of research designed to address the key candidate causes so far put forward, but recognising that it would not be sensible to duplicate work being undertaken elsewhere.

Military Bases: Germany

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many standard (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3 and (d) 4 accommodation units there are at UK bases in Germany. (151760)

Service families accommodation (SFA) and single living accommodation (SLA) in Germany is assessed by grade for charge (rather than Standard for Condition which is used in Great Britain).

On that basis, the total number of SFA and SLA by grade is as follows:

Germany

SFA

SLA

Grade 1

2,101

1,658

Grade 2

5,376

1,354

Grade 3

4,743

3,475

Grade 4

982

9,782

Total

13,202

16,269

Grade for charge is broken down on amenities and location. Grade for charge 1 would be accommodation that is close to all amenities. Grade 4 would be properties further away. This differs from standard for conditions, which relates to the physical condition of the property.

Navy: Drug Seizures

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how the cocaine seized by the Royal Navy in 2006-07 was disposed of. (149480)

The physical seizure of cocaine on Royal Navy interdiction operations is conducted by personnel from relevant local law enforcement agencies embarked on Royal Naval vessels. Once retrieved, the cocaine becomes the responsibility of the relevant law enforcement agency.

Navy: Warships

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the (a) destroyers, (b) frigates and (c) attack submarines (i) currently deployed and (ii) available for short-notice deployment with the fleet. (152063)

[holding answer 25 July 2007]: As at 19 July 2007, the following vessels were deployed:

Destroyers:

HMS Manchester

HMS Edinburgh

HMS Southampton

HMS York

Frigates:

HMS Cornwall

HMS Kent

HMS Monmouth

HMS Portland

HMS Richmond

HMS Montrose

Attack Submarines:

The general policy is that we do not discuss submarine operations. Fleet Attack Submarines (SSN) are on patrols in various locations.

As my predecessor made clear in his letter of 6 March 2007, a copy of which is available in the Library of the House, it is not MOD policy to publish details of the readiness states of individual RN vessels or types. I am not prepared, therefore, to provide details of vessels available for short-notice deployments.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what progress has been made with planning for the use of dual crews for warships; and in respect of which classes of warships it is being considered. (152064)

[holding answer 25 July 2007]: The Royal Navy is conducting trials and experimentation programmes to help determine optimal manning solutions, both in the short and mid to longer term, that will maximise the contribution to defence by enabling ships to remain deployed for extended periods, while minimising the impact on personnel. These programmes include swapping ship’s companies of HMS Edinburgh and HMS Exeter (Type 42 destroyers), and several Mine Counter Measure Vessels; and providing temporary relief for some personnel on the extended deployment of HMS Sutherland and HMS Monmouth (Type 23 frigates). The trials are continuing.

Peacekeeping Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many repatriations of bodies have occurred (a) via RAF Brize Norton and (b) via RAF Lyneham in each year since 2003. (150163)

The information requested is shown in the following table.

RAF Brize Norton

RAF Lyneham

2003

53

0

2004

38

0

2005

16

14

2006

64

0

2007 (as at 20 July)

15

36

Total

186

50

In the process of answering this question, it has become apparent that some of the figures provided in response to the hon. Member’s parliamentary question of 26 March 2007, Official Report, column 1359W, were incorrect.

Unfortunately there were errors in the source documentation for the 2004, 2005 and 2007 figures for repatriations held by Headquarters Air Command. A figure for 2005 was inadvertently reflected in 2004. Also, the figures for 2006 did not include the 14 personnel who were killed in the Nimrod XV230 crash in September 2006. This was because the repatriation ceremony for these personnel was held at RAF Kinloss, but because their bodies were repatriated through, and returned to, RAF Brize Norton, with hindsight it is clear that they should have been included.

RAF Personnel Management Agency: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the (a) initial resource provision, (b) in-year variation and (c) resource outturn was for the RAF Personnel Management Agency in each financial year since 1997. (146959)

The RAF Personnel Management Agency relinquished Government agency status at the start of financial year 2004-05. Therefore budgetary information for that agency is only available up to the financial year 2003-04.

The resource outturn for financial years 1997-98 to 2003-04 can be found in the RAF Personnel Management Agency annual report and accounts, which are available in the Library of the House.

The figures for initial resource provision and in-year variations are not held.

Territorial Army: Recruitment

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what estimate he has made of the number of Territorial Army (TA) posts which will not be filled as a result of the decision to freeze recruiting in some TA units; and what proportion of TA manpower this represents; (152662)

(2) pursuant to the answer of 19 June 2007, Official Report, column 1769W, on reserve forces: recruitment, which Territorial Army units have a recruitment freeze; and what the (a) establishment and (b) current manning level is of each, broken down by (i) rank and (ii) appointment.

It is not possible to provide the information requested, as the details of measures limiting the strength of selected Territorial Army units have not yet been finalised. However, I can assure the hon. Member that a rigorous process involving a wide range of army stakeholders is currently assessing the likely impact of these measures and ensuring that coherence and effectiveness are maintained. I will write to the hon. Member with the results of that process once it is complete and will place a copy of my letter in the Library of the House.

Trident

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when he expects to make the first of the regular reports to Parliament on progress made in the Trident replacement programme, as referred to by the former Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs on 14 March 2007, Official Report, column 309. (150280)

In accordance with the usual practice on major procurement projects, the first full progress report on the programme to maintain the UK’s nuclear deterrent will be made after the Initial Gate for the new class of submarines, currently estimated to be in 2009. Interim reports will be provided depending on progress with the programme.

Type 45 Destroyers

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether there has been a change in the intention to build eight Type-45 Destroyers. (151186)

[holding answer 25 July 2007]: No decision has yet been made to order the seventh and eighth Type 45 destroyers. A number of factors will be taken into account as part of the decision-making process, including affordability, value for money, and the wider context of the defence industrial strategy.

Unmanned Air Vehicles: Costs

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the projected costs are of the Watchkeeper UAV system programme; and if he will make a statement on progress in delivering the programme. (148568)

The acquisition costs for the Watchkeeper system are expected to be around £840 million. The planned in-service date is 2011.

Innovation, Universities and Skills

Scientific Research

23. To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the level of public funding for scientific research. (152575)

Public investment in R and D in 2005 was £7.4 billion. It has grown by almost 30 per cent. in real terms since 1997. The CSR07 period will see the science budget continue to rise above inflation.

Adult Education

24. To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what change there has been in the number of adult learning courses in the last 12 months; and if he will make a statement. (152576)

I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave the hon. Member for South-West Norfolk (Mr. Fraser).

Apprenticeships

25. To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills how many apprenticeships were (a) started and (b) finished in (i) 1997 and (ii) 2006. (152577)

In the 1996-97 academic year 70,100 apprentices started. Information on framework completions was not collected at that time. In the 2005-06 academic year, 171,300 apprentices started and 99,000 completed the full framework.

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what steps he is taking to increase the number of people applying for adult apprenticeships. (152468)

The continuing expansion of apprenticeships provision, for both young people and adults, is a priority for the Government. Currently around one third of apprentices are aged 19 to 24, and evidence from recent trials of 25+ apprenticeships suggests that they can be a useful method of learning for some people. Therefore the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) is making available £16.7 million in 2007-08 to fund 8,000 additional places for this age group.

The Government will naturally encourage and support employers, LSC and sector skills councils (SSCs) in their normal promotion practices to recruit adult apprentices to fill the 8,000 places.

The Government are also supporting the LSC in its new skills campaign ‘Our future. It’s in our hands’ launched on 9 July. This campaign is aimed at improving the skills of the nation and will include the promotion of adult apprenticeships.

Science and Innovation

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what progress has been made on the Government’s 10-year strategy on science and innovation published in 2004; and if he will make a statement. (152571)

The Government published their third annual report on the Science and Innovation Investment Framework on Monday (23 July). The report shows that over the last year there has been continued, good progress in implementing the Government’s challenging vision for science and innovation.

Apprentices: Cumbria

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills how many apprenticeships there were in Westmorland and Lonsdale in (a) 2005-06 and (b) 2006-07. (152894)

Figures for those participating in apprenticeships can be derived from the Learning and Skills Council’s (LSC) Individualised Learner Record (ILR). There were 440 learners on apprenticeships and 250 on advanced apprenticeships in the Westmorland and Lonsdale parliamentary constituency (based on home post code of the learner) in 2005/06. Comparable figures for 2006/07 will not be available until December 2007.

Source:

Learning and Skills Council (LSC) Work Based Learning (WBL) Individualised Learner Record (ILR).

Numbers have been rounded to the nearest 10.

Basic Skills: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills how many organisations have signed up to the Skills Pledge scheme. (152566)

More than 150 leading private and public sector employers from across England made the Skills Pledge at its launch on 14 June. This means that over 1.7 million employees are covered by a Skills Pledge. Since 14 June an additional 146 companies have expressed an interest in the Skills Pledge through the Train to Gain website and helpline. Brokers are currently working with these employers to take their commitment forward.

Unemployment: York

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what percentage of 16 to 19-year-olds in York were registered as unemployed in January 2007. (151627)

I have been asked to reply.

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 26 July 2007:

As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Question asking what percentage of 16 to 19 year olds in York were registered as unemployed in January 2007. (151627)

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) compiles unemployment statistics for parliamentary constituencies from the Annual Population Survey (APS) following ILO definitions.

For the 12 months ending in December 2006, the latest available data, there were 1,000 persons aged 16 to 19, resident in the City of York constituency, who were unemployed. This estimate is 16 per cent of the resident population aged 16 to 19. The unemployment rate, which is the number of unemployed expressed as a percentage of the economically active population, in that age group, was 25 per cent.

As these estimates are for a subset of the population in small geographical areas, they are based on small sample sizes, and are therefore subject to large margins of uncertainty.

ONS also compiles statistics for local areas of people claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA). For January 2007, there were 200 persons aged 16 to 19, resident in the City of York constituency, claiming JSA. The corresponding figure for the latest available month, June 2007, is 180.

Table 1: employment by sex; City of York parliamentary constituency

Thousand

Men

Women

Total

12 months ending

Level1

Rate2 (percentage)

Level1

Rate2 (percentage)

Level1

Rate2 (percentage)

February 1997

22

71

22

65

44

68

February 1998

24

74

21

63

45

69

February 1999

28

81

20

65

48

73

February 2000

25

81

20

72

45

77

February 2001

27

81

24

76

51

79

February 2002

28

81

24

72

51

77

February 2003

29

83

25

72

54

77

February 2004

28

80

25

73

53

77

March 2005

29

80

26

71

55

75

March 2006

27

79

25

73

52

76

1 Persons aged 16 and over.

2 Persons of working age—males aged 16 to 64 and females aged 16 to 59.

Note:

Estimates are subject to sampling variability. Changes in the estimates over time should be treated with particular caution.

Source:

Annual local area Labour Force Survey; Annual Population Survey

Table 2: employment by sex; City of York unitary authority

Thousand

Men

Women

Total

12 months ending

Level1

Rate2 (percentage)

Level1

Rate2 (percentage)

Level1

Rate2 (percentage)

February 1997

43

79

39

71

82

75

February 1998

43

79

34

65

77

72

February 1999

45

82

38

71

83

76

February 2000

44

81

39

71

83

76

February 2001

49

84

44

78

93

81

February 2002

49

84

43

75

93

80

February 2003

50

84

43

74

93

79

February 2004

48

82

43

77

92

79

March 2005

49

82

43

76

92

79

March 2006

48

81

45

76

93

79

1 Persons aged 16 and over.

2 Persons of working age—males aged 16 to 64 and females aged 16 to 59.

Note:

Estimates are subject to sampling variability. Changes in the estimates over time should be treated with particular caution.

Source:

Annual local area Labour Force Survey; Annual Population Survey

Table 3: employment by sex; Yorkshire and the Humber

Thousand

Men

Women

Total

12 months ending

Level1

Rate2 (percentage)

Level1

Rate2 (percentage)

Level1

Rate2 (percentage)

February 1997

1,163

74

988

66

2,151

70

February 1998

1,178

76

993

66

2,170

71

February 1999

1,202

77

1,010

68

2,212

73

February 2000

1,197

77

1,014

68

2,211

73

February 2001

1,208

78

1,051

70

2,259

74

February 2002

1,221

78

1,044

69

2,265

73

February 2003

1,233

78

1,047

68

2,280

73

February 2004

1,248

78

1,064

69

2,312

74

March 2005

1,252

79

1,068

69

2,320

74

March 2006

1,251

78

1,072

69

2,322

74

1 Persons aged 16 and over.

2 Persons of working age—males aged 16 to 64 and females aged 16 to 59.

Note:

Estimates are subject to sampling variability. Changes in the estimates over time should be treated with particular caution.

Source:

Annual local area Labour Force Survey; Annual Population Survey

Young People: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what discussions he has had with ministerial colleagues on the provision of youth training opportunities in the public sector. (152569)

Around a third of the current total of 250,000 apprenticeships are being delivered in the public sector. We want to expand apprenticeships to meet Lord Leitch’s ambition for 500,000 apprentices in learning in the UK (400,000 in England) by 2020. I will be speaking to my ministerial colleagues about this over the coming weeks.

Prime Minister

Parliamentary Questions

To ask the Prime Minister what criteria apply in deciding which ordinary written parliamentary questions of which no previous notice has been given shall be answered on the next day. (153753)

I have been asked to reply.

All Ministers aim to answer all parliamentary questions as soon as possible.

Wales

Administration of Justice

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what discussions he has held with Welsh ministers on the possible devolution of responsibility for criminal justice to the National Assembly for Wales. (151855)

Departments: Official Hospitality

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many receptions were held at Gwydyr House in each of the last five years. (152836)

The following is a breakdown of the number of receptions hosted year on year in Gwydyr House.

Receptions

2003

3

2004

3

2005

6

2006

5

2007

4

Departments: Stationery

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how much his Department spent on stationery in each of the last five years. (152835)

Stationery is supplied under a general office supplies contract, and its cost within the total is not identified separately.

National Assembly for Wales (Legislative Competence) Order 2007

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales when he expects the draft National Assembly for Wales (Legislative Competence) Order 2007 to be laid before the House. (152696)

The proposed draft order was placed in the Vote Office and Library of the House today, 26 July 2007. Copies can also be downloaded via the Wales Office website.

House of Commons Commission

Official Report: Paper

To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission, what estimate he has made of the amount of paper required to distribute copies of the Official Report to all right hon. and hon. Members' Westminster and constituency offices during a sitting week. (152903)

Copies of the daily part of the Official Report are not distributed to all right hon. and hon. Members' offices, but 252 copies are distributed to the offices or other addresses of Members who have specifically requested such a distribution by completing a sessional demand form.

In all an average of 1,758 copies of the Official Report are produced daily. The total amount of paper, including run-up, waste and trimmings, used in the production of the daily part of the Official Report during a typical sitting week of four sitting days is approximately 3 tonnes. The 252 copies distributed on request to the Members' offices equate to an amount of paper of just under 450 kg.

Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform

Coal: Sulphur

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform if he will undertake research on the sulphur content of coal mined in the United Kingdom. (150716)

Information about the typical sulphur content of UK coal reserves is readily available in a range of technical publications. In addition, integrated pollution prevention and control regulations require regular sampling and analysis of the sulphur content of coal being used in processes within their scope, such as electricity generation, with the amalgamated reported data being published by the Environment Agency. This is in addition to any sampling carried out by UK producers and their customers to ensure that shipments comply with contract terms.

Electricity: Energy Supply

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what representations his Department has made to electricity providers on disruptions to the electricity supply in the last three years. (152734)

Electrical inspectors in my Department receive reports of significant interruptions to electricity supply and investigate incidents if the circumstances are warranted. For example inspectors looked into the interruptions at Hurst, London, in October 2006 (National Grid—transformer failure); Carnaby Street, London, in July 2006 (EDF—transformer and underground cable failure); in southern Scotland in March 2006 (storm impact); at Bournemouth in November 2005 (Southern Electricity—fire affecting overhead power line); at Carlisle in January 2005 (United Utilities—substation flooded); and at Birmingham in February 2004 (Aquila now Central Networks—fire in cable tunnel).

Inspectors also look into circumstances of specific localised power failures affecting individual customers, if problems remain unresolved.

My officials also liaise closely with electricity companies on an ongoing basis to ensure arrangements are in place to handle large-scale emergency situations.

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what records his Department keeps of disruptions to the electricity supply. (152737)

My Department maintains records of significant interruptions to electricity supply in GB.

These are reported to the Department in accordance with regulation 32 of the Electricity Safety, Quality and Continuity Regulations 2002 as amended. Electricity transmission and distribution companies are required to report incidents affecting 20 MW of demand or more for more than three minutes, or 5 MW of demand or more for more than one hour, or 5,000 customers or more for more than one hour.

Electricity: Meters

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform if he will have a meeting with the gas and electricity suppliers, smart meter manufacturers and environmental stakeholders including Energywatch and the Carbon Trust to discuss the Government’s plans for smart meters. (148223)

My Department has had and will continue to have further discussion on its proposals for smart meters with a range of interested parties, including energy suppliers, metering manufacturers and environmental stakeholders. The Government have also indicated that they will consult on the implementation of proposals in the context of their ambition to see a roll-out of smart meters within 10 years.

Electronic Equipment: Waste Disposal

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what steps his Department has taken to raise awareness with the public and business of obligations and responsibilities relating to the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive. (151735)

The WEEE regulations place a number of obligations on producers and retailers of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) to provide information to consumers as to how best they can dispose of their WEEE to help protect the environment. From 1 July consumers are receiving information from retailers when they buy a new item of electrical equipment on how they can do this.

A number of trade associations have been helping to raise awareness among their members. The Department has organised roadshows, seminars and mailouts as well as press and publicity in national, regional and trade publications. Further briefing events will be taking place in September across the UK for small businesses.

Energy Development Unit

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (1) what measures are in place in the Energy Development Unit to govern gifts and hospitality provided by energy companies; and if he will make a statement; (151772)

(2) what the total value is of gifts and hospitality received by the Energy Development Unit from energy companies in each year since 1997.

All civil servants in the Department are required to follow the Department's guidance on the acceptance of hospitality and gifts, set out in the staff handbook.

The guidance recognises that, in the business world, hospitality is a common and well established means of maintaining working relationships and conducting business and that, in these circumstances, civil servants may accept it when the issues of propriety and possible conflicts of interest have been properly considered.

Under this guidance, a gifts and hospitality register was established in 1998, on which is registered all gifts over £10 in value and all material hospitality accepted.

The register was not set up to record the estimated value of gifts or hospitality until 2001 and the guidance does not require estimates to be entered when they may not be known or meaningful, for instance in the case of lunches or dinners. The following table shows the total of the values recorded between 2001 and 22 July 2007, and the percentage of entries where no value was given.

Value of gifts and hospitality received from energy companies: 2001-07

Year

Value recorded (£)

Percentage that were not given a value

2001

2,242

74

2002

1,741

65

2003

612

71

2004

1,442

51

2005

1,313

54

2006

3,403

32

20071

1,626

38

1 To 22 July

Export Controls

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what plans the Government have to tighten end-use controls over the re-export of UK supplies components as part of their review of export control legislation. (152259)

As the hon. Member is aware, I announced on 18 June 2007 a review of the export control legislation introduced in 2004 under the Export Control Act 2002. This includes a public consultation which seeks comments on the impact and effectiveness of the legislation and whether there is a need to change or enhance the controls.

In these circumstances I am unable to comment substantively on the potential for changes to the controls as this would risk prejudging the outcome of the review. However, the consultation document includes options for amending the Military End-Use Control, which currently applies in specified circumstances to components that are not controlled elsewhere in the legislation.

Where items that are being exported are licensable under current UK export control legislation, all known relevant factors, including whether the items are for incorporation into other equipment for re-export to a third country, are taken into account in the assessment of licence applications. When it is clear that military goods will be re-exported or that the equipment into which they are incorporated will be re-exported to a country covered by a full scope military arms embargo, the application for those items will be refused under the Consolidated EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria.

Respondents to the consultation will be able to provide their views, reasoning and evidence on this issue, as well as raising any other areas where they believe that the Government should consider changing the controls.

Housing: South East Region

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what representations the South East England Development Agency has made to the South East England regional assembly on the level of the yearly house building target in the Regional Spatial Strategy. (153738)

Following the South East England regional assembly’s adoption of housing growth options in October 2004, SEEDA commissioned work to explore the needs of the region’s economy. This established that maintaining present economic growth rates would require up to 45,000 new houses per annum, and that improvements in productivity and economic activity rates could reduce this requirement to 34,800 new houses per year while maintaining overall growth rates.

On the basis of this work (which was published by SEEDA), SEEDA’s board agreed in March 2005 a response to the Regional Spatial Strategy consultation draft (published in April 2005) which made the case for a minimum average level of housing growth of 34,800 units per year 2006-26. The regional assembly adopted a proposed profile of 32,000 units per annum for 2006-11 and 36,000 units per annum for 2011-26.

Once the draft RSS was published in April 2006, SEEDA’s board reconsidered the evidence at its June 2006 meeting and reaffirmed its support for the housing growth levels given above.

On this basis, SEEDA submitted written objections to the draft RSS which were considered by the Panel of Inspectors at the Examination in Public (October 2006-March 2007).

Manufacturing Industries: Balance of Trade

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what the latest annual figure is for the trade deficit in manufacturing; and what steps his Department is taking to reduce it. (153307)

The Office for National Statistics estimates that the UK trade deficit in manufactures (Standard International Trade Classification sections 5 to 8) was about £51.9 billion in 2006 on a balance of payments basis.

The Government are strongly committed to the development of a high-value modern manufacturing sector which competes effectively in global markets. We have been successful in providing a stable macro-economic framework in which business can prosper and grow and are taking action through the manufacturing strategy to enable manufacturers to move to high value-added production through the application of science and innovation and the development of world class skills.

Nuclear Power Stations

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform pursuant to the Prime Minister's oral answer of 4 July 2007, Official Report, columns 954-5, whether the Government have made a decision to build new nuclear power stations; and if he will make a statement. (152314)

Before we make a decision on nuclear, we are committed to consulting. Our nuclear consultation was published on 23 May. The Government have a preliminary view that it would be in the public interest to give energy companies the option to consider nuclear alongside other forms of low carbon electricity generation, but have not made a decision.

The Government will consider all responses as part of the consultation and will make a decision later this year after, and in the light of, the consultation.

Renewables Obligation

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what assessment he has made of the effect of the renewables obligation on carbon dioxide emissions. (151950)

Between 2002-03, when the RO was introduced, and 2005-06—the latest date for which figures are available from Ofgem—the RO was responsible for 37.9 TWh of generation from renewable sources. This amounts to a saving of 5.2 MtC.

Work by Oxera, published alongside the consultation on banding the RO on 23 May 2007, suggests that unchanged, the RO is estimated to save 90.6 MtC over its lifetime (until 2026-27).

Renewables generation assets, such as wind farms, which have been built to take advantage of the RO will continue in operation after the RO has come to an end, providing further savings beyond 2026-27.

Severn Barrage

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what discussions he has had with (a) the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, (b) the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust and (c) the wildlife trusts on the proposal to build a Severn tidal barrage. (151704)

[holding answer 24 July 2007]: There is no specific proposal at present to build a Severn barrage, so I have not had any discussions with the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) or any of the wildlife trusts on this issue.

However, the Sustainable Development Commission, with financial support from various parties including my Department, is undertaking a major study of tidal power in the UK. The study is looking at various options for harnessing the potential tidal energy resource that exists around the UK, including within the Severn estuary.

The study has included a programme of stakeholder and public engagement, as part of which the SDC has held discussions with the RSPB and the statutory conservation agencies. The SDC's final report is expected to be published in September and further details of the study can be seen at

www.sd-commission.org.uk/pages/tidal.html.

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform if he will ask the Sustainable Development Commission to take evidence from right hon. and hon. Members representing constituencies in the areas around the river Severn as part of its study of tidal power in the UK. (151896)

[holding answer 24 July 2007]: A central part of the Sustainable Development Commission's (SDC) work has been a public and stakeholder engagement programme. Although not aimed exclusively at Members for the Severn region constituencies, a stakeholder workshop held in Cardiff and an online forum on the SDC website have provided Members with the opportunity to contribute to the study.

Given that the study is now at an advanced stage and with the final report expected in September, I am doubtful about whether the SDC would find it reasonably practicable to accommodate such a request. However, Members are free to directly approach the SDC, with which any decision on whether or not to accept further representations rests.

It is worth pointing out that were any specific development proposal taken forward, significant public consultation would be required.

Shipping

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform if he will (a) initiate and (b) evaluate research on the effect on the UK economy of the diminishing size of the UK merchant navy’s (i) number of British-registered ships, (ii) number of UK merchant navy officers and (iii) UK maritime skills base; and if he will make a statement. [R] (152366)

I have been asked to reply.

Government reports and statistics monitor changes in the UK merchant navy and the effect of these changes on the UK economy on a regular basis. The Department for Transport’s (DfT) annual “Maritime Statistics” records the size of the UK merchant fleet.

In recent years, the UK registered fleet has not been diminishing, as the hon. Member suggests. Between December 1997 and March 2007 the number of UK registered ships increased by over a quarter to over 1,900 (of which 1,459 are merchant vessels), while their deadweight capacity increased fourfold from 3.5 million tonnes to 14 million tonnes.

The DfT has commissioned London Metropolitan University to produce an annual assessment of the number of UK merchant navy officers, ratings, and new trainees, published in “United Kingdom Seafarers Analysis”. The DfT has also commissioned two studies from Cardiff University in 1996 and 2003 on “The UK economy’s requirements for people with experience of working at sea”. In addition the Inland Revenue and the DfT produced a “Post Implementation Review of Tonnage Tax” in 2004.

Health

Abortion

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many women aged (a) under 16, (b) 16 to 18, (c) 19 to 24, (d) 25 to 29, (e) 30 to 34, (f) 35 to 39 and (g) over 40 years of age in (i) Essex strategic health authority and (ii) England and Wales who had an abortion in 2006 had (A) no children, (B) one child, (C) two children, (D) three children, (E) four children and (F) five or more children. (152785)

The information requested is set out in the following table.

(i) Total abortions for residents of Essex PCTs1 by number of previous births, 2006

Total previous pregnancies that resulted in a live or still birth

Age2

0

1

2

3

4

5 and more

Total

under 18

533

554

18 to 19

549

636

20 to 24

931

300

140

1,427

25 to 29

448

266

241

86

1,072

30 to 34

172

190

247

114

781

35 to 39

121

117

265

112

686

40 and over

34

45

116

66

283

Total all ages

2,788

1,009

1,025

424

133

60

5,439

1 Totals shown relate to PCTs for Mid Essex, North East Essex, South East Essex, South West Essex and West Essex. 2 Age groups are shown as published so as not to overlap ages and (for reasons of confidentiality) reveal small numbers, suppressed value or where a presented total would reveal a suppressed value.

(ii) Total abortions by number of previous births, England and Wales, 2006

Total previous pregnancies that resulted in a live or still birth

Age1

0

1

2

3

4

5 and more

Total

under 16

3,960

3,990

16 and 17

13,721

14,629

18 and 19

18,625

3,448

533

22,667

20 to 24

35,293

12,751

5,600

1,360

274

62

55,340

25 to 29

18,735

9,341

7,828

3,244

928

320

40,396

30 to 34

7,981

6,491

8,020

3,670

1,323

668

28,153

35 to 39

3,682

3,903

6,877

3,481

1,341

790

20,074

40 and over

1,174

1,504

3,066

1,693

630

421

8,488

Total all ages

103,171

38,295

31,985

13,495

4,517

2,274

193,737

1 Age groups are shown as published so as not to overlap ages and (for reasons of confidentiality) reveal small numbers, suppressed value or where a presented total would reveal a suppressed value.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many abortions were carried out at each week of gestation (a) between four and 17 weeks and (b) from 24 weeks in 2006; what the (i) age of mother, (ii) residency of mother, (iii) grounds for abortion, (iv) marital status of mother, (v) number of previous children and (vi) number of previous abortions were in each case; and how many and what percentage of those abortions were performed in the (A) public and (B) private sectors. (152857)

The information requested is set out in the following tables.

(i) Abortions by age and gestation, residents, England and Wales, 2006

Gestation

Age

3 & 4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

u20

124

1,118

4,085

6,411

7,860

5,601

4,888

3,127

2,344

1,271

1,050

20-24

254

2,156

6,715

9,659

10,351

7,337

6,138

3,763

2,770

1,502

1,157

25-29

270

2,120

5,872

7,915

7,457

5,014

3,976

2,365

1,707

935

620

30-34

199

1,536

4,424

5,536

5,039

3,420

2,671

1,637

1,160

654

408

35+

205

1,670

4,632

5,753

5,088

3,220

2,578

1,499

1,208

763

456

Total

1,052

8,600

25,728

35,274

35,795

24,592

20,251

12,391

9,189

5,125

3,691

Gestation

Age

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24+

Total

u20

810

553

483

375

357

262

213

175

168

11

41,286

20-24

891

619

516

386

324

280

207

172

121

22

55,340

25-29

513

352

311

250

180

176

125

112

98

28

40,396

30-34

369

222

194

165

104

117

113

76

66

43

28,153

35+

341

256

203

181

146

97

96

81

57

32

28,562

Total

2,924

2,002

1,707

1,357

1,111

932

754

616

510

136

193,737

Note:

Totals are grouped where there are less than 10 (0 to 9) cases, or where a presented value would reveal a total less than 10 (0 to 9) when used with data already published.

(ii) Abortions by country of residence and gestation, performed in England and Wales, 2006

Gestation

Country of residence

3 & 4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

England and Wales

1,052

8,600

25,728

35,274

35,795

24,592

20,251

12,391

9,189

5,125

3,691

Scotland

43

57

48

19

16

Republic of Ireland

482

1,015

968

735

438

353

246

171

91

Other non England and Wales residents

186

333

348

238

182

119

86

54

68

Gestation

Country of residence

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24+

Total

England and Wales

2,924

2,002

1,707

1,357

1,111

932

754

616

510

136

193,737

Scotland

11

20

27

20

31

362

Republic of Ireland

94

71

77

56

28

37

25

15

5,042

Other non England and Wales residents

57

59

55

45

35

28

25

20

2,032

Note:

Totals are grouped where there are less than 10 (0 to 9) cases, or where a presented value would reveal a total less than 10 (0 to 9) when used with data already published.

(iii) Abortions by grounds, residents, England and Wales, 2006

Gestation

Grounds

9 and under

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Section 1(1 )(a) and other1

131,020

20,240

12,333

8,964

4,823

3,515

2,819

1,889

1,589

Section 1(1 )(d)

21

11

58

225

302

176

105

113

118

Total

131,041

20,251

12,391

9,189

5,125

3,691

2,924

2,002

1,707

Gestation

Grounds

18

19

20

21

22

23

24+

Total

Section 1(1 )(a) and other1

1,242

1,021

787

573

485

398

0

191,698

Section 1(1 )(d)

115

90

145

181

131

112

1136

2,039

Total

1,357

1,111

932

754

616

510

136

193,737

1 Abortions 24 weeks and over and carried out under sections 1(1)(b), 1(1)(c) and 1(4) of the Abortion Act are included in total 136.

Note:

Totals are grouped where there are less than 10 (0 to 9) cases, or where a presented value would reveal a total less than 10 (0 to 9) when used with data already published.

More detail for grounds by gestation group can be found in Table 7b of Abortion Statistics, England and Wales, 2006

Section 1(1)(a): that the pregnancy has not exceeded its twenty-fourth week and that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated, of injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman or any existing children of her family.

Section 1(1)(b): that the termination is necessary to prevent grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.

Section 1(1)(c ): that the continuance of the pregnancy would involve risk to the life of the pregnant woman, greater than if the pregnancy were terminated.

Section 1 (1)(d): that there is a substantial risk that if the child were born it would suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped

Section 1(4): that the termination is immediately necessary to save the life or to prevent grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman.

(iv) Abortions by marital status and gestation, residents, England and Wales, 2006

Gestation

Marital status

3 & 4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Single

614

4,793

14,752

21,967

24,110

16,997

14,141

8,663

6,505

3,459

2,645

Married

126

1,322

3,638

5,301

4,854

3,138

2,407

1,424

1,112

754

408

Divorced, separated, widowed

39

295

782

1,025

1,003

657

551

298

236

140

102

Not known/not stated

273

2,190

6,556

6,981

5,828

3,800

3,152

2,006

1,336

772

536

Total

1,052

8,600

25,728

35,274

35,795

24,592

20,251

12,391

9,189

5,125

3,691

Gestation

Marital status

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24+

Total

Single

1,931

1,355

1,127

924

750

625

504

397

349

49

126,657

Married

300

231

225

177

150

154

147

117

99

66

26,150

Divorced, separated, widowed

87

52

35

34

23

14

11

5,403

Not known/not stated

606

364

320

222

188

139

91

35,527

Total

2,924

2,002

1,707

1,357

1,111

932

754

616

510

136

193,737

Note:

Totals are grouped where there are less than 10 (0 to 9) cases, or where a presented value would reveal a total less than 10 (0 to 9) when used with data already published.

(v) Abortions by number of previous live or stillbirths and gestation, residents, England and Wales, 2006

Gestation

Number of previous live or stillbirths over 24 weeks

3 & 4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

0

630

4,697

13,815

18,880

19,204

13,029

10,428

6,443

4,766

2,699

1,921

1

192

1,495

4,795

6,579

6,964

4,924

4,239

2,567

1,962

1,130

833

2

162

1,549

4,571

6,128

5,989

4,071

3,295

1,960

1,415

736

556

3 or more

68

859

2,547

3,687

3,638

2,568

2,289

1,421

1,046

560

381

Total

1,052

8,600

25,728

35,274

35,795

24,592

20,251

12,391

9,189

5,125

3,691

Gestation

Number of previous live or stillbirths over 24 weeks

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24+

Total

0

1,555

1,060

915

730

641

550

445

386

313

64

103,171

1

671

431

362

298

239

186

164

122

103

39

38,295

2

390

307

232

169

118

113

89

64

52

19

31,985

3 or more

308

204

198

160

113

83

56

44

42

14

20,286

Total

2,924

2,002

1,707

1,357

1,111

932

754

616

510

136

193,737

Note:

Totals are grouped where there are less than 10 (0 to 9) cases, or where a presented value would reveal a total less than 10 (0 to 9) when used with data already published.

(vi) Abortions by number of previous abortions, residents, England and Wales, 2006

Gestation

Number of previous abortions

3 & 4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

0

711

5,771

17,303

23,597

24,646

16,696

13,945

8,380

6,210

3,514

2,542

1

278

2,159

6,432

8,925

8,463

5,966

4,772

3,007

2,307

1,257

883

2 or more

63

670

1,993

2,752

2,686

1,930

1,534

1,004

672

354

266

Total

1,052

8,600

25,728

35,274

35,795

24,592

20,251

12,391

9,189

5,125

3,691

Gestation

Number of previous abortions

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24+

Total

0

1,995

1,365

1,193

961

788

657

586

471

379

123

131,833

1

709

473

396

305

252

220

124

117

47,156

2 or more

220

164

118

91

71

55

44

28

14,748

Total

2,924

2,002

1,707

1,357

1,111

932

754

616

510

136

193,737

Note:

Totals are grouped where there are less than 10 (0 to 9) cases, or where a presented value would reveal a total less than 10 (0 to 9) when used with data already published.

Abortions by purchaser and gestation, numbers and percentages, residents, England and Wales, 2006

Purchaser

NHS

NHS Agency

Private

Total

Gestation

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

3 & 4

73

7

440

42

539

51

1,052

100

5

1,285

15

4,193

49

3,122

36

8,600

100

6

6,194

24

12,759

50

6,775

26

25,728

100

7

10,153

29

18,715

53

6,406

18

35,274

100

8

16,173

45

16,124

45

3,498

10

35,795

100

9

12,493

51

10,394

42

1,705

7

24,592

100

10

11,535

57

7,625

38

1,091

5

20,251

100

11

6,722

54

4,999

40

670

5

12,391

100

12

4,425

48

4,214

46

550

6

9,189

100

13

2,004

39

2,786

54

335

7

5,125

100

14

1,246

34

2,273

62

172

5

3,691

100

15

786

27

1,897

65

241

8

2,924

100

16

569

28

1,264

63

169

8

2,002

100

17

409

24

1,160

68

138

8

1,707

100

18

276

20

953

70

128

9

1,357

100

19

17

16

837

75

99

9

1,111

100

20

182

20

660

71

90

0

932

100

21

212

28

490

65

52

7

754

100

22

152

25

383

62

81

3

616

100

23

128

25

328

64

54

11

510

100

24+

136

100

0

0

136

100

Total

75,328

39

92494

48

25,915

13

193,737

100

Note:

Percentages are rounded and may not add up to 100.

Abortion: Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how many children under 18 years had (a) a third and (b) fourth abortion in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available; (152782)

(2) how many women in (a) Essex Strategic Health Authority and (b) England and Wales had an abortion in 2006 who had already had (i) six and (ii) seven previous abortions.

Numbers of abortions to women age under 18 who have had a third or fourth abortion are not available for release for confidentiality reasons. This is because either the totals are less than 10 (between zero and nine cases) or because a presented total would reveal the value of a suppressed total already published. This is in line with the Office for National Statistics’ guidance on the disclosure of abortion statistics (2005).

Numbers of women resident in the Essex Primary Care Trusts of Mid Essex, North East Essex, South East Essex, South West Essex and West Essex who had an abortion in 2006 who already had (i) six and (ii) seven previous abortions are also not available for release for the same reasons stated above. The numbers for England and Wales are published in Table 4b of the Statistical Bulletin “Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2006”, copies of which are available in the Library.

Abortion: Private Sector

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list the independent-sector places which applied to be registered with the Healthcare Commission to perform abortions in each of the last 12 months; how many applications were (a) accepted and (b) rejected; and if he will make a statement. (152858)

The Healthcare Commission had three new applications from independent-sector places to register for the termination of pregnancy between July 2006 and the end of June 2007. The applications have yet to be determined and therefore remain commercial in confidence.

Admissions: Heart Diseases

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients were admitted to hospital with congestive heart failure in each of the last five years, broken down by strategic health authority. (152919)

Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the statement by the Minister of State on 15 May 2007, Official Report, column 203WH, on the Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy, whom the Minister of State has met; and which further stakeholders she plans to meet. (153372)

As the ministerial reshuffle occurred shortly after publication of the strategy and the recess is now imminent, no ministerial meetings with alcohol stakeholders have taken place since the strategy was published. However, early meetings are being sought by industry organisations, and Ministers would expect to meet them, as well as non-governmental organisations such as Alcohol Concern and senior medical representatives.

Alcoholic Drinks: Females

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of smoke-free pubs on levels of binge drinking by women. (153632)

The Department is not aware of any assessment or evidence on the potential impact of smoke-free pubs on levels of binge drinking by women.

Alcoholic Drinks: Health Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans he has to incorporate alcohol monitoring in the Quality and Outcomes Framework. (147980)

As part of the ongoing development of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), indicators and clinical areas will be reviewed in the light of the clinical evidence base. The Expert Panel which advises the QOF negotiations looks at new areas for clinical intervention by practices, in the context of value for money and the benefits to patients.

Alcoholic Drinks: Misuse

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will publish regular progress reports on the Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy. (153634)

The ministerial group on alcohol harm reduction, which is chaired jointly by myself and the Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department, my hon. Friend the Member for Gedling (Mr. Coaker), continue to monitor and manage the delivery of the priority actions and outcomes that are set out in ‘Safe. Sensible. Social. The next steps in the National Alcohol Strategy’.

Information on progress against the priority actions that are detailed in ‘Safe. Sensible. Social.’, and links to statistical data assessing reductions in alcohol harm or changes in public awareness will be published regularly on a new Government website, the details of which will be announced in the near future.

Ambulance Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which conditions are treated by ambulance trusts as Category (a) A and (b) B emergencies. (151817)

Emergency 999 calls made to ambulance control centres are prioritised so that each can be responded to according to clinical need and receive a level of care appropriate to the patient(s) condition. In order to do this national health service ambulance trusts within England use a process of call categorisation.

Call categorisation means that the caller is asked a series of questions about the patient. From the responses provided, the call is allocated a code (determinant). This provides a description of the caller’s injury/illness and the severity of that problem. Software products are used to help call handlers triage and categorise calls, and the code allocated will depend on the software product used.

Each determinant has been allocated a response level, by the Department, based on independent expert advice, according to the perceived severity of the determinant description. There are three response levels:

category A applies to a call where there appears to be an immediate threat to life.

category B identifies cases that appear to be serious in nature and require urgent assessment.

category C identifies cases that appear to be neither immediately serious or life-threatening.

Lists of codes for each software product, grouped by response level, are produced annually and are published on the Department of Health’s website. Copies have been placed in the Library.

Ambulance Services: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many paramedics worked for the North West Ambulance Service and its predecessors in each of the last five years; and what the projected numbers are for (a) 2007-08, (b) 2008-09 and (c) 2009-10. (152870)

The number of paramedics (headcount) working in the specified organisations as at 30 September each year for the period 2002 to 2006 is shown in the table.

Specified organisation

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Cumbria Ambulance Service National Health Service Trust

121

144

148

146

1

Greater Manchester Ambulance Service NHS Trust

334

358

381

387

1

Lancashire Ambulance Service NHS Trust

166

198

210

232

1

Mersey Regional Ambulance Service NHS Trust

281

337

298

416

1

North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust

1

1

1

1

1,175

Total of specified organisations

902

1,037

1,037

1,181

1,175

1 Not applicable.

Source:

Information Centre for health and social care non-medical workforce census.

Workforce planning is a matter for individual trusts to undertake, working with their commissioners and strategic health authorities. Plans need to be, and are, regularly reviewed as circumstances change. North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust has recently provided information to the Department on projected numbers for paramedics. I understand that the trust intends to have 1,347 whole-time equivalents in employment as paramedics in 2007-08, 1,361 in 2008-09 and 1,375 in 2009-10.

In 2006, numbers of ambulance staff were collected under new, more detailed occupation codes. This included the introduction of a code for emergency care practitioners and the North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust recorded 39 ECPs in 2006.

More accurate validation processes in 2006 have resulted in the identification and removal of 9,858 duplicate non-medical staff records out of the total workforce figure of 1.3 million in 2006. Earlier years’ figures could not be accurately validated in this way and so will be slightly inflated. The level of inflation in earlier years’ figures is estimated to be less than 1 per cent. of total across all non-medical staff groups for headcount figures (and negligible for full-time equivalents). This should be taken into consideration by those analysing trends over time.

Anaemia: Medical Treatments

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what assessment he has made of the impact of the negative guidance by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in its final appraisal of the frequent use of erythropoietins in managing cancer-related anaemia on UK blood stocks; (152992)

(2) what guidance his Department provides to clinicians managing cancer-related anaemia on the account to be taken of (a) the Chief Medical Officer's advice to conserve blood stocks and (b) the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence’s cost-effectiveness advice on the use of erythropoietins.

We have made no such assessment. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has not yet issued final guidance to the NHS on the clinical and cost effectiveness of erythropoietins in the management of cancer treatment-induced anaemia. NICE issued an appraisal consultation document on 29 June and its Appraisal Committee will consider the responses received. NICE expects to issue final guidance later this year.

Arthritis: Young People

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what treatment options are available to people with juvenile arthritis. (153343)

Children living with juvenile arthritis are able to access a range of treatment options depending on the severity of their condition. Drugs that health professionals are able to prescribe include analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, disease-modifying drugs, corticosteroids, and anti-tumour necrosis inhibitors. Surgery and joint replacement are also available for those severely affected.

Asthma: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) children and (b) adults were diagnosed with asthma in each London borough in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. (153561)

Information on the number of cases of adult and childhood asthma is not collected centrally.

Autism: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what services were provided for autistic children in each London borough in each of the last five years. (153639)

The information requested is not held centrally. It is for primary care trusts to decide what services to provide for their local communities.

Blood Transfusions: Cancer

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate his Department has made of (a) the proportion and (b) the number of blood transfusions given to cancer patients in the latest period for which figures are available. (151997)

It is estimated that at least 25 per cent. of red cells are given to patients with cancer. Not all of these units are given for direct treatment of cancer. Figures for the actual number of transfusions are not collected, but in 2006-07 the National Blood Service issued 1,864,271 units of red blood cells.

These figures are based on provisional results from the Epidemiology and Survival of Transfusion Recipients study, a National Blood Service study of patients transfused in England in 2001-02. The study is in the final stages and will be submitted for publication soon. However, it is based on data collected five years ago so it is likely that changes in blood use have occurred since then.

Breast Cancer: Screening

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will introduce family history breast screening as part of the national breast screening programme; and if he will make a statement. (152926)

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published a clinical guideline on familial breast cancer in May 2004, partially updated in October 2006.

The clinical guideline relates to the classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer in primary, secondary and tertiary care. The guideline recommends that women at moderate familial risk of breast cancer or greater should receive annual mammography or magnetic resonance imaging surveillance.

NICE clinical guidelines are covered by the Department’s developmental standards, standards which the national health service is expected to achieve over time. The Healthcare Commission has responsibility for assessing progress towards achieving these standards.

As part of the development of the new Cancer Reform Strategy, we are examining the feasibility of bringing the management of surveillance of women at moderate familial risk of breast cancer or greater into the NHS breast screening programme.

Cancer: Anaemia

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate his Department has made of the economic cost of working days lost due to cancer-related anaemia and fatigue. (152021)

The Department has made no estimate of the economic cost of working days lost due to cancer-related anaemia and fatigue.

Cancer: Drugs

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 10 July 2007, Official Report, columns 1437-40W, on cancer: drugs, what the date of licence in the UK was for each drug. (152435)

The following table shows the date on which each specific indication was authorised (information current at 24 July 2007).

Condition and Drugs

Date of authorisation for specific indication

Drug substance

Notes

Aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma—rituximab (MabThera)

Specific indication is not licensed

Rituximab

MabThera is licensed for the treatment of patients with CD20 positive diffuse large B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Breast cancer—docetaxel (Taxotere)

28 August 2000

Docetaxel

First line treatment for advanced or metastatic breast cancer

Breast cancer—paclitaxel (Taxol)

27 March 2000

Paclitaxel

Breast cancer bevacizumab (Avastin)

27 March 2007

Bevacizumab

Breast cancer (advanced or metastatic)—lapatinib (Tyverb)

Drug substance not licensed

Lapatinib

Breast cancer (advanced)—tratuzumab (Herceptin)

28 August 2000

Tratuzumab

Breast cancer (advanced)—vinorelbine (Navelbine)

10 May 1996

Vinorelbine

Breast cancer (early)—anastrozole (Arimidex)

29 October 2002

Anastrozole

Breast cancer (early)—docetaxel (Taxotere)

Specific indication is not licensed

Docetaxel

Current licence is for advanced or metastatic breast cancer

Breast cancer (early)—exemastane (Aromasin)

26 August 2005

Exemastane

Breast cancer (early)—letrozole (Femara)

9 September 2004

Letrozole

Breast cancer (early)—paclitaxel (Taxol)

Specific indication is not licensed

Paclitaxel

Current licence is for advanced or metastatic breast cancer

Breast cancer (early)—trastuzumab (Herceptin)

22 May 2006

Trastuzumab

Breast cancer (locally advanced)—capecitabine (Xeloda)

21 March 2002

Capecitabine

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia—fludarabine (Fludara)

11 August 1994

Fludarabine

Chronic myeloid leukaemia—imatinib (Glivec)

7 November 2001

Imatinib

Colon cancer (adjuvant)—capecitabine (Xeloda)

30 March 2005

Capecitabine

Colon cancer (adjuvant)—irinotecan (Campto)

Specific indication is not licensed

Irinotecan

Not licensed for adjuvant treatment

Colon cancer (adjuvant)—oxaliplatin (Eloxatin)

18 October 2004

Oxaliplatin

Colorectal cancer (advanced)==irinotecan (Campto)

14 July 1999

Irinotecan

Colorectal cancer (advanced)—oxaliplatin (Eloxatin)

23 August 1999

Oxaliplatin

Colorectal cancer (advanced)—ralitrexed (Tomudex)

11 August 1995

Ralitrexed

Colorectal cancer (metastatic)—capecitabine (Xeloda)

2 February 2001

Capecitabine

Colorectal cancer (metastatic)—tegafur + uracil (Uftoral)

5 January 2001

Tagafur + uracil

Follicular lymphoma—rituximab (MabThera)

2 June 1998

Rituximab

Gastro-intestinal stromal tumours (GIST)—imatinib (Glivec)

7 November 2001

Imatinib

Glioblastoma multiforme (recurrent)—carmustine (Gliadel)

28 September 2000

Carmustine

Glioma (newly diagnosed and high-grade)—carmustine (Gliadel)

14 December 2004

Carmustine

Glioma (newly diagnosed and high-grade)—temozolomide (Temodal)

21 April 2005

Temozolomide

Head & neck cancer—cetuximab (Erbitux)

29 March 2006

Cetuximab

Lung cancer (non small cell)—bevacizumab (Avastin)

Specific indication is not licensed

Bevacizumab

Not licensed for lung cancers of any type

Lung cancer (non small cell)—erlotinib (Tarceva)

19 September 2005

Erlotinib

Lung cancer (non small cell)—gefitinib (Iressa)

Not licensed

Gefitinib

Drug substance not licensed

Lung cancer (non small cell)—pemetrexed (Alimta)

20 September 2004

Pemetrexed

Lung cancer (non-small cell)—paclitaxel (Taxol)

18 November 1998

Paclitaxel

Lung cancer (non-small cell) docetaxel (Taxotere)

20 January 2000

Docetaxel

Lung cancer (non-small cell) gemcitabine (Gemzar)

26 April 2000

Gemcitabine

Lung cancer (non-small cell) vinorelbine (Navelbine)

10 May 1996

Vinorelbine

Mesothelioma pemetrexed (Alimta)

20 September 2004

Pemetrexed

Metastatic breast cancer—gemcitabine (Gemzar)

25 November 2004

Gemcitabine

Metastatic colorectal cancer—bevacizumab (Avastin)

12 January 2005

Bevacizumab

Metastatic colorectal cancer—cetuximab (Erbitux)

24 June 2004

Cetuximab

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma—rituximab (MabThera)

21 March 2002

Rituximab

Ovarian cancer—paclitaxel (Taxol)

11 October 1996 (for first line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer)

Paclitaxel

Original licence was for second-line treatment only

Ovarian cancer—pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx)

24 October 2000

Doxorubicin

Ovarian cancer (advanced)— topotecan (Hycamtin)

12 November 1996

Topotecan

Pancreatic cancer gemcitabine (Gemzar)

30 October 1996

Gemcitabine

Pancreatic cancer—Rubetican

Not licensed

Rubetican

Drug substance not licensed

Prostate cancer Atrasentan

Not licensed

Atrasentan

Drug substance not licensed

Prostate cancer—docetaxel (Taxotere)

6 February 2004

Docetaxel

Recurrent malignant glioma—temozolomide (Temodal)

20 January 1999

Temozolomide

Relapsed multiple myeloma—bortezomib (Velcade)

26 April 2004

Bortezomib

Renal cell carcinoma—bevacizumab (Avastin)

Specific indication is not licensed

Bevacizumab

Substance not licensed for renal cancers

Renal cell carcinoma—sorafenib tosylate (Nexavar)

29 July 2004

Sorafenib tosylate

Renal cell carcinoma—sunitinib (Sutent)

11 January 2007

Sunitinib

Cardiovascular System: Screening

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what progress has been made in identifying a suitable risk assessment engine to calculate cardiovascular risk in patients in England and Wales; and what consideration has been given to the importance of including waist circumference for assessment by such a tool. (152178)

Recent publications by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network and by the QResearch group, the latter in the British Medical Journal, have outlined new approaches to cardiovascular risk assessment. These publications offer significant contribution to the debate that will now take place as a result of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence’s recent publication of draft clinical guidelines on lipid modification, which covers cardiovascular risk assessment. The Department is monitoring this debate with interest.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what the reasons are for the delay in his Department’s Vascular Programme and guidance on vascular assessment; and when he expects this to be published; (152179)

(2) what steps he is taking to ensure that the guidance on vascular risk assessment being prepared by his Department will be implemented successfully at primary care level.

The Department has made no commitment to publish guidance on vascular risk assessment. There has been no delay in the publication of such guidance.

The Department’s Vascular Programme Board has been giving careful consideration to the potential benefits of a more integrated approach to vascular risk assessment and management. This is a complex area, which requires further study particularly in the light of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence’s recently published draft guidance on lipid modification, which covers cardiovascular risk assessment.

Chiropody: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether he has taken steps to protect the numbers of pre-registration training commissions for podiatrists. (149269)

Within the overall resources allocated, it is a matter for each strategic health authority (SHA) to determine its own priorities including how much is spent on pre-registration training commissions for podiatrists. Under the current service level agreement with SHAs each SHA is expected to provide for investment in training commissions based on long-term work force need and local financial plans.

Chronically Sick People

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will make a statement on the role of specialist nurses in the delivery of health and social care to those with long-term conditions. (152007)

Specialist nurses provide a valuable additional resource in the treatment and management of many long-term conditions. They can help people to manage their condition to maintain stability, improve quality of life and prevent frequent admission to hospital and reduce length of stay

The Government remain committed to the continued development of such roles, and to ensuring that there are enough specialist nurses and other health care professionals to provide high quality services for all client groups.

The responsibility for specific staffing numbers and skill mix rests with the local national health service. We have given local NHS organisations the freedom to decide how best to use their resources, in consultation with local stakeholders, as they know the health needs of their local communities best.

CJD: Blood

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will make it his policy to make the use of prion removal blood filters mandatory in the UK should the tests on prion removal blood filters in blood transfusions in Ireland prove successful. (153532)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to the hon. Member for Kettering (Mr. Hollobone), 14 June 2007, Official Report, column 1298W.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate he has made of the likely number of vCJD blood transfusion transfer cases over the next two years. (153534)

No estimates have been made of the likely number of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) cases arising from blood transfusion over the next two years. However the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee (SEAC) did issue a position statement on Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy infectivity in blood in 2006. A copy of the statement can be found on the SEAC website at

www.seac.gov.uk/statements

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what studies have been carried out on prion removal of blood filters in the UK; and if he will make a statement. (153535)

The United Kingdom blood services are independently evaluating the efficacy of the prion reduction filters that are currently available and which meet the qualifying criteria laid down by the Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs for Transplantation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many cases of vCJD have been recorded in the UK as a result of blood transfusions. (153536)

There have been three cases of Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) in the United Kingdom arising from blood transfusions from donors who subsequently died of vCJD. All three patients have died. A fourth patient who received a transfusion from a donor who subsequently died was also found to have abnormal prion protein in the spleen and a lymph node after dying of an unrelated illness.

Colorectal Cancer: Screening

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many inquiries to the (a) NHS Direct telephone service and (b) NHS Direct online service on the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme have been made since April 2006. (151967)

The information requested is not held centrally. This is a matter for the Chief Executive of the NHS Direct Trust.

Community First Responder Groups: North West Region

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many Community First Responder groups there are in each of the five counties in the north west region. (152868)

This information is not collected centrally by the Department. This would be a matter for the chair of the North West Ambulance Service.

Community Nurses: Abuse

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many community nurses experienced (a) physical abuse and (b) verbal abuse in each year since 1997; how many representations his Department has received about abuse towards community nurses; and if he will make a statement. (151469)

The information requested is not collected in the format requested.

In April 2003 the NHS Security Management Service (NHS SMS) was created and assumed responsibility for the issue of tackling violence against NHS staff. Since its creation, the NHS SMS has collected data on the number of reported physical assaults against national health service staff in England for the reporting periods 2004-05 and 2005-06, broken down by NHS trust. This data has been placed in the Library.

Both the Department and the NHS SMS take the security of community nurses very seriously. The NHS SMS is in continual contact with a wide range of stakeholders representing and involved in the work of community nursing.

“Not Alone: A guide for the better protection of lone workers in the NHS” was issued by the NHS SMS in March 2005.

Compulsorily Detained Mental Patients

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people were sectioned under the Mental Health Act 1983 in each of the last 10 years, broken down by (a) type of section and (b) age of patient. (151021)

Information about the number of patients detained in England under the Mental Health Act 1983 by type of section in national health service hospitals and independent hospitals registered to detain people under the Mental Health Act 1983 between 1997 and 2006 has been obtained from the Information Centre for health and social care. This information is shown in the following table.

Information about the age of patients detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 is not held centrally.

All formal admissions to independent hospitals registered to detain patients under the Mental Health Act 1983 and other legislation, by legal status, 1996-97 to 2005-06. Includes changes in legal status from informal to formal of patients while in the hospital—England

Number of admissions

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-2000

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04R

2004-05

2005-06

Total formal admissionsl

1,297

1,451

1,842

1,968

1,816

2,193

1,806

1,829

2,029

1,934

From informal to formal— total

399

486

583

555

410

524

503

426

400

321

informal to 5(2) and 5(4)

232

291

346

308

251

283

273

292

274

194

informal to 2

83

90

109

139

96

140

116

65

48

45

informal to 3

84

105

128

108

63

101

114

69

78

82

Formal admissions into hospital (excl. place of safety detentions)

898

965

1,259

1,413

1,406

1,669

1,303

1,403

1,629

1,613

Part II patients—total

773

866

1,045

1,233

1,208

1,439

1,056

1,119

1,220

1,301

2

322

389

454

545

491

573

423

460

483

582

3

412

457

561

669

705

846

621

652

732

712

4

38

20

30

19

12

20

12

7

5

7

Court and prison disposals—total

122

93

205

173

185

217

244

279

405

302

35

7

7

8

7

14

11

10

11

15

16

36

2

1

2

3

4

2

3

3

1

37(4)2

22

25

52

39

37 (with S41 restrictions)

30

17

73

51

48

74

65

46

88

92

37 (without S41 restrictions)

56

61

66

62

99

93

45A

5

7

17

21

47 (with S49 restrictions)

3

8

12

38

48

71

31

47 (without S49 restrictions)

9

26

31

33

10

5

7

15

21

9

48 (with S49 restrictions)

1

5

6

4

34

36

31

73

64

33

48 (without S49 restrictions)

1

6

12

Other sections—38, 44, 46

46

5

16

15

11

14

25

15

31

27

Previous legislation (Fifth Schedule) and other Acts

3

6

9

7

13

13

3

5

4

10

1 From 1995-96 transfers between providers without a change in legal status are not included. Changes from informal to formal status while in hospital area also included.

2 From 1995-96, these admissions are counted under the appropriate section at the point was formally admitted to hospital.

R Revised from bulletin published in December 2004.

Source:

KH15, K037 and KP90

All formal admissions to NHS facilities (including high security psychiatric hospitals) of patients detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 and other legislation, by legal status, 1995-96 to 2005-06. Includes changes in legal status from informal to formal of patients while in hospital—England

Number of admissions

1995-96

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-2000

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04R

2004-05

2005-06

Total formal admissionsl

40,965

39,943

42,578

45,063

44,731

44,765

44,652

43,558

42,623

43,296

43,942

From informal to formal— total

16,326

17,116

18,128

19,413

19,444

19,539

20,112

18,458

17,818

18,173

18,202

informal to 5(2)

8,927

9,238

9,701

10,244

10,091

10,081

10,254

9,534

8,894

8,232

7,637

informal to 5(4)

1,315

1,505

1,616

1,706

1,773

1,932

1,948

1,909

1,779

1,839

1,673

informal to 2

2,429

2,266

2,344

2,483

2,655

2,628

2,525

2,299

2,481

3,003

3,425

informal to 3

3,655

4,107

4,467

4,980

4,925

4,898

5,385

4,716

4,664

5,099

5,467

Formal admissions into hospital (excl. place of safety detentions)

24,639

22,827

24,450

25,650

25,287

25,226

24,540

25,100

24,805

25,123

25,740

Under Mental Health Act 1983: Part II patients—total

22,570

21,045

22,659

23,980

23,807

23,890

23,211

23,812

23,468

23,834

24,317

2

12,292

11,084

12,225

13,200

12,940

13,152

13,027

13,623

13,650

14,327

14,683

3

8,915

8,479

8,854

9,091

9,030

8,955

8,149

8,386

8,235

8,236

8,435

4

1,363

1,482

1,580

1,689

1,837

1,783

2,035

1,803

1,583

1,271

1,199

Court and prison disposals—total

1,836

1,751

1,762

1,655

1,468

1,293

1,279

1,254

1,322

1,259

1,362

35

271

261

262

253

191

134

126

141

130

103

116

36

21

31

24

21

18

15

21

21

11

9

16

37(4)2

37 (with S41 restrictions)

287

255

241

253

243

211

191

177

189

190

230

37 (without S41 restrictions)

504

447

391

376

338

310

264

286

257

250

229

45A

2

1

3

2

1

47 (with S49 restrictions)

211

203

209

219

190

176

173

182

204

228

242

47 (without S49 restrictions)

29

22

31

11

17

21

36

32

51

51

47

48 (with S49 restrictions)

341

333

403

374

320

262

313

266

276

282

328

48 (without S49 restrictions)

51

41

26

24

21

14

13

13

25

8

14

Other sections—38, 44, 46

121

158

175

124

128

150

141

133

177

138

139

Previous legislation (Fifth Schedule) and other Acts

233

31

29

15

12

43

50

34

15

30

61

1 From 1995-96, transfers between providers without a change in legal status are not included. Changes from informal to formal status while in hospital area also included.

2 From 1995-96, these admissions are counted under the appropriate section at the point when the patient was formally admitted to hospital.

R Revised from bulletin published in December 2004.

Source:

KH15, KO37and KP90

Conal Timoney

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 15 June 2007, Official Report, column 1383W, on Conal Timoney, from which company Mr. Timoney’s services are being contracted; what the value is of that contract; and what Mr. Timoney’s salary is. (148831)

Mr. Timoney is no longer a contractor with the Department. He is engaged for the Department via a short-term national health service contract. The Department does not comment on employment terms negotiated with the NHS.

Dementia: Westmorland

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what additional community-based services have been commissioned for people suffering dementia-related illnesses in Westmorland and Lonsdale since 2006. (152892)

The information requested is not held centrally.

It is for primary care trusts to commission services for their local populations and to work with the local health community and other stakeholders to plan, develop and improve health services to meet the needs of the community, including people suffering dementia-related illnesses.

Dental Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 16 July 2007, Official Report, columns 156-7W, on dental services, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that units of dental activity which were commissioned in 2006-07 but not provided by 1 April 2007 are provided by primary care trusts in 2007-08. (152220)

The Department has provided guidance for primary care trusts on managing under-delivery of commissioned services in the document ‘Primary care dental contracts: Advice on managing end-year issues ’. Copies have been placed in the Library and are available at

www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_064321

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what value of dental services were commissioned, expressed as units of dental activity, in (a) the test year of 1 October 2004 to 30 September 2005 and (b) the financial year immediately preceding the implementation of the new general dental services contract. (152222)

Prior to April 2006, dentists providing general dental services were not subject to commissioning arrangements by primary care trusts (PCTs). Personal dental services pilot schemes were commissioned by PCTs but units of dental activity were not then available as a contract currency for setting or measuring levels of dental activity.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what guidance his Department issues to primary care trusts on applying the index of orthodontic treatment need. (152223)

Guidance to primary care trusts on national health service orthodontic assessments and the index of orthodontic treatment need is set out in the document ‘Strategic Commissioning of Primary Care Orthodontic Services’, copies of which are placed in the Library and are also available at

www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4139176

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what proportion of people in (a) Westmorland and Lonsdale, (b) the Morecambe Bay Primary Care Trust area, (c) the North West Region and (d) England are registered with an NHS dentist. (152871)

Since April 2006, patients no longer have to be registered with a dental practice to receive national health service care and treatment.

The closest equivalent measure to ‘registration’ is the number of patients receiving NHS dental services (‘patients seen’) in a given area over a 12-month period, expressed as a percentage, of the estimated population for that area. However, this is not directly comparable to the registration data for earlier years.

The numbers of patients seen as a per cent, of the population in the 24 month periods ending 31 March, 30 June, 30 September, 31 December 2006 and 31 March 2007 are available in Table F2 of Annex 3 of the NHS Dental Statistics for England Q4: 31 March 2007 report. Information is available at strategic health authority and primary care trust (PCT) area in England.

This report has been placed in the Library and is also available on-line at

www.ic.nhs.uk/pubs/dentalq4

Information cannot be made available at constituency level without disproportionate cost.

As from 1 October 2006, Morecambe Bay PCT was integrated into Cumbria PCT and North Lancashire PCT. Information for Cumbria PCT and North Lancashire PCT is included in the above report.

Dental Services: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many dental practices (a) opened and (b) closed in each London borough in each of the last five years. (153560)

Departments: Contracts

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 25 June 2007, Official Report, column 235W, on Departments: contracts, how much was spent on contracts awarded to external suppliers by public bodies sponsored by his Department in each year since 2001. (151529)

The Department does not regularly collect data on contracts awarded to external suppliers by public bodies sponsored by the Department, including their spend. I refer the hon. Member to the answer given on 25 June 2007, Official Report, column 235W.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how his Department monitors contracts issued by public bodies reporting to his Department, with particular reference to the terms and conditions applied to their workforce. (151553)

There is currently no mechanism for the Department to monitor contracts awarded by individual national health service trusts.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 15 June 2007, Official Report, columns 1383-5W, on departments: contracts, what contractual advantage service category 27 delivered over service category 11. (152083)

In terms of the procurement of the Framework for procuring External Support for Commissioners, there is no contractual advantage to the Department arising from the use of service category 27 over service category 11.

Departments: Land

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what disposals his Department made of land in Hampshire in each year since 1997; and whether he required any of the land to be used for social housing. (149941)

The table identifies the larger sites in Hampshire in the ownership of the Secretary of State for Health that have been disposed of since 1997.

Disposal

1997

Part of Park Prewett, Basingstoke

Part of Hazel Farm, Southampton

1998

Part of St. James’ Hospital, Portsmouth

1999

Part of Hazel Farm, Southampton

St. Paul’s Hospital, Winchester

Part of Prewett Park, Basingstoke

2000

Knowle Hospital, Fareham

2001

Part of Hazel Farm, Southampton

Part of Lord Mayor Treloar, Alton

2002

Leigh House, Southampton

2003

Part of St. James’ Hospital, Portsmouth

2004

Part of Lord Mayor Treloar, Alton

2005

Part of Park Prewett, Basingstoke

Part of Lord Mayor Treloar

Part of Coldeast Hospital, Fareham

Tatchbury Hospital, Calmore

Part Hazel Farm, Southampton

It is the responsibility of local planning authorities to identify and release land for housing as part of the planning process. This means that the requirement for the provision of social housing will need to be negotiated and agreed with the local planning authority. The Government have implemented a number of initiatives to assist with land supply for housing. A register of surplus public sector land held by central Government bodies has been established. English Partnerships reviews the sites on the register to identify those which could have the potential for housing development. As at June 2007, there were over 700 sites on the register. Sites are continually being added as they are identified as surplus by landowners and removed once expressions of interest are received after a site has been marketed.

The Department for Communities and Local Government and English Partnerships also maintain the national land use database of previously developed land (NLUD-PDL). This covers vacant and derelict land and also land in use with potential for development in public and private ownerships. Information on the sites is available from the NLUD website

www.nlud.org.uk.

In addition, English Partnerships is developing the National Brownfield Strategy which will provide a coherent vision for the future development of brownfield land to underpin national, regional and local development aspirations. The strategy will help our target for building new homes on brownfield land thereby reducing pressures on the greenbelt.

Departments: Legislation

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what legislative provisions introduced by his Department since 1997 have not yet been brought into force; (149558)

(2) what legislative provisions introduced by his Department since 1997 have been repealed.

Seven Acts of Parliament introduced by the Department since 1997 include some sections and schedules not yet brought into force:

Acts introduced by the Department of Health since 1997

Not yet in force

National Health Service (Primary Care) Act 1997 (c.46)

Section 26(2)

Schedule 2 Part I paras 46 and 64(3)

Schedule 3 Part II

Health Act 1999 (c.8)

Section 61

Care Standards Act 2000 (c.14)

Section 64(1)(a) and (3)-(5)

Schedule 4 para 5(7)(b), 12, 14(10)(b), (22) and (29)

Schedule 5 paras 1 and 2

Health and Social Care Act 2001 (c.15)

Section 26(1) and (3)

Section 55(7)

Community Care (Delayed Discharges etc.) Act 2003 (c.5)

Section 14

Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Act 2003 (c.43)

Section 107

Section 116(3)

Schedule 14 part 6

Health Act 2006 (c.28)

Section 36(2)

18 Acts of Parliament introduced by the Department since 1997 include some sections and schedules now repealed, details as follows. Many of these were repealed as a consequence of the National Health Service Act 2006 (c.41) which consolidated much of the previous health legislation.

Acts introduced by the Department of Health since 1997

Repealed

National Health Service (Primary Care) Act 1997 (c.46)

Sections 1-9

Sections 11-20

Section 21(1)

Section 22(1)

Section 23(1) and (2)

Section 24(1)

Section 25(1)

Section 26(1)

Section 27(1)

Section 28(1)

Section 29(1)

Section 31(1)

Section 32

Section 33

Section 34(1)

Section 36

Section 40(1) and (3)

Schedule 1

Schedule 2 paras 3-31, 65, 691-81

National Health Service (Private Finance) Act 1997 (c.56)

Section 1

Nurses, Midwives and Health Visitors Act 1997 (c.24)

Whole Act repealed by Health Act 1999

Pharmacists (Fitness to Practise) Act 1997 (c.19)

Whole Act repealed

Community Care (Residential Accommodation) Act 1998 (c.19)

Section 11

Section 3(2)1

Health Act 1999 (c.8)

Sections 2-12

Section 13(l)-(4) and (6)-(11)

Section 14

Section 15

Sections 17-42

Section 62(2), (3), (5) and (8)

Section 66(6)

Section 68(l)(a) and (4)

Schedule 1

Schedule 2

Schedule 2A

Schedule 3 paras 2(2), 8(3) and 11(3)

Schedule 4 paras 2, 4-32, 331, 34-41, 701, 71, 75, 76-79, 81, 83, 84, 85(2)(b), 87, 881 and 89

Road Traffic NHS Charges Act 1999 (c.3)

Whole Act repealed

Care Standards Act 2000 (c.14)

Section 6

Section 7

Section 9

Section 10(1)

Section 22(8)(a)1

Section 32(8)

Section 44

Section 45

Section 46

Section 47

Section 49(2)

Section 51

Section 801

Sections 81-891

Section 89(4C)(d)

Section 90

Section 91-991

Section 100

Section 1011

Section 102

Section 104

Schedule 1 paras 9-11, 15, 17, 27(a), 27(c) and 27(d)

Schedule 2 para 6(5)

Schedule 2A paras 4, 18, 21, 22, 24

Schedule 4 paras 2, 5, 61, 7, 81, 13, 14(4)-(6), 161, 24, 25, 25(2)(a)1, 26(2) and (4)1, 27(b)

Carers and Disabled Children Act 2000 (c.16)

Section 5

Section 9(a)

Health Service Commissioners (Amendment) Act 2000 (c.28)

Sections l(2)(b), (3)(c) and (d)

Health and Social Care Act 2001 (c.15)

Sections 1-4

Section 6

Section 7(2)-(5)

Sections 8-13

Section 14(1) and (3)

Sections 15-25

Section 261

Sections 27-38

Sections 40-43

Sections 45-48

Section 60

Section 61

Section 64(3)

Section 68(2) and (3)

Schedules 1-4

Schedule 5 paras 5, 8, 11 and 12

National Health Service Reform and Health Care Professions Act 2002 (c.17)

Section 1

Section 2(1)-(4)

Section 3

Section 4(1) and (2)

Sections 5-18

Section 19(l)-(5)

Section 20

Section 21

Section 22(1)-(3), (4), (8) and (9)

Section 23

Section 24

Section 351

Section 36

Section 42(7)

Schedule 1 paras 1-35, 37, 40-43, 46, 19-53, 55

Schedule 2 paras 1-10, 111, 12-37, 54, 55, 58, 64, 67-69, 72-82

Schedule 3 paras 1-11, 14-17

Schedule 4

Schedule 4 paras 4-20, 211, 22-24, 31-33, 36, 38, 43, 44, 45 and 49-51

Schedule 6 paras 1-15

Schedule 7 para 5

Schedule 8 paras 1-12, 18, 23-37

Tobacco Advertising and Promotion Act 2002 (c.36)

Section 12(4)

Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Act 2003 (c.43)

Sections 1-32

Section 33(2)

Sections 35-40

Section 76(2)(f), (g)

Section 77(3)

Section 79(7)

Section 80(5)

Section 110

Section 112

Section 116(1)

Sections 170-172

Section 174

Section 175

Sections 177-183

Section 187(1)-(7), (9), (10)

Section 188

Section 189(l)-(3) and (4)1

Section 191

Section 192

Schedule 1

Schedule 2 paras 23-45, 83-85, 108, 109, 115-118, 123 and 124

Schedule 5

Schedule 6 para 3(2), (3), (9), (10), (14) and (15)

Schedule 7 para 3(2), (6)-(8)

Schedule 9 paras 9, 10, 141, 18(2), 26, 271, 32

Schedule 11 paras 7-32, 331, 35-45, 61(b), 62(3) and 69-74

Schedule 12 paras 1, 2(3), 3(2) and (4) and 4-8

Schedule 13 paras 4, 6(a) and (b)

Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Deceased Fathers) Act 2003 (c.24)

Section 2(2) and (3)

Schedule para 111

Health Protection Agency Act 2004 (c.17)

Schedule 1 para 2

Schedule 3 para 11

Health Act 2006 (c.28)

Section 34

Section 35

Section 36(1)

Sections 37-42

Sections 44-56

Section 74

Section 78(3)

Schedule 3

Schedule 8 paras 6, 7-11, 12(a) and (b), 13(1)-(6), 14-20, 21(a), 21(b), 22-25, 29, 34, 36, 44(5), 46-50, 51 and 54

National Health Service Act 2006 (c.41)

Section 132(9)

1 As from a day to be appointed.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) which Bills introduced by his Department in the last five years contained sunset clauses; and what plans he has for the future use of such clauses; (151843)

(2) which Bills introduced by his Department in the last five years did not contain sunset clauses; and if he will make a statement.

The Department has not introduced any Bills containing sunset clauses in the last five years. The Department has no current plans for the future use of such clauses, but their use may be considered where appropriate.

None of the Bills introduced by the Department in the last five years have contained sunset clauses.

Departments: Members

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what meetings that (a) he and (b) each of his Ministers has held with hon. Members in the last 12 months; and what was discussed in each case. (147569)

A comprehensive list of all meetings that Ministers have held with hon. Members in the last 12 months could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Departments: Postal Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what volume of correspondence his Department sent (a) by Royal Mail and (b) by other commercial delivery services in each of the last five years; and what the reasons were for the use of other commercial delivery services. (150448)

Figures for the period 2004-07 are as follows.

Delivery services

2004-05

Royal Mail volume

306,700 letters

Commercial carriers

88,000 letters/packets

2005-06

Royal Mail volume

634,627 letters

Commercial carriers

90,324 letters/packets

2006-07

Royal Mail volume

359,600 letters

Commercial carriers

91,364 letters/packets

Figures for before 2004 can be provided only at a disproportionate cost.

Where there is a particular requirement to deliver items in a set or urgent timeframe the Department will use commercial carriers for both national and international delivery including items that require signature.

Departments: Public Bodies

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 19 June 2007, Official Report, columns 1630-4W, for what reason a recurrent budget for 2007-08 is given for the English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting. (151942)

These are the residual costs from the funding of the English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, an arm’s length body which closed in March 2002.

Departments: Public Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 14 June 2007, Official Report, column 1385W, to the hon. Member for Rayleigh (Mr. Francois), on Departments: public expenditure, how many such regular discussions have been held in the last 12 months. (146951)

Ministers and officials regularly discuss a wide range of issues with their counterparts in the Treasury. As was the case in previous Administrations, it is not the practice of the Government to provide details of all such meetings.

Diabetes: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people participated in the (a) dose adjustment for normal eating and (b) diabetes education and self-management for ongoing and newly diagnosed courses in London in each of the last five years, broken down by primary care trust. (152798)

This information requested is not held centrally. It is for primary care trusts to decide what services to provide for their local communities.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people were diagnosed with diabetes in each London borough in each of the last five years. (153558)

This information is not available in the format requested.

However, the following table shows the number of patients aged over 17 years with a record of a diagnosis of diabetes for the years 2004-05 and 2005-06. Data for 2006-07 will be published in September.

Patients aged less than 17 are considered to be cared for by hospital specialists and are not included in these numbers. Any increases in the number of patients from year-to-year cannot be assumed to represent an increase in the number of patients with diabetes, as it may reflect improved levels of recording by the practices.

Total list size and register counts for people with diabetes in the London primary care trust (PCT) for 2004-05 and 2005-06

SHA code

Strategic health authority name

PCT code

PCT name

Total list size

Diabetes register count

2004-05

Q04

North West London

5AT

Hillingdon

261,750

9,154

5H1

Hammersmith and Fulham

190,019

4,961

5HX

Ealing

362,673

14,409

5HY

Hounslow

251,041

9,180

5K5

Brent

349,145

15,236

5K6

Harrow

227,927

10,233

5LA

Kensington and Chelsea

183,296

4,117

5LC

Westminster

244,188

6,211

Q05

North Central London

5A9

Barnet

371,545

12,178

5C1

Enfield

282,866

9,708

5C9

Haringey

278,025

8,989

5K7

Camden

245,115

5,691

5K8

Islington

222,342

6,049

Q06

North East London

5A4

Havering

247,003

8,306

5C2

Barking and Dagenham

172,748

6,122

5C3

City and Hackney Primary Care Team

265,498

8,644

5C4

Tower Hamlets Primary Care Team

225,668

9,402

5C5

Newham Primary Care Team

310,022

13,805

5NA

Redbridge

242,958

10,133

5NC

Waltham Forest

250,877

10,076

Q07

South East London

5A7

Bromley

315,982

9,244

5A8

Greenwich

258,432

7,443

5LD

Lambeth

344,588

9,875

5LE

Southwark

280,231

8,759

5LF

Lewisham

278,990

9,347

TAK

Bexley Care Trust

221,611

7,589

Q08

South West London

5A5

Kingston

178,948

5,109

5K9

Croydon

359,874

13,052

5LG

Wandsworth

311,003

8,856

5M6

Richmond and Twickenham

198,448

4,235

5M7

Sutton and Merton

389,319

12,414

2005-06

Q04

North West London

5AT

Hillingdon

262,572

9,701

5H1

Hammersmith and Fulham

189,293

5,236

5HX

Ealing

368,598

15,418

5HY

Hounslow

251,943

9,794

5K5

Brent

342,752

15,928

5K6

Harrow

229,704

10,846

5LA

Kensington and Chelsea

184,295

4,436

5LC

Westminster

244,899

6,446

Q05

North Central London

5A9

Barnet

373,036

12,915

5CI

Enfield

284,985

10,588

5C9

Haringey

241,664

8,468

5K7

Camden

237,437

5,893

5K8

Islington

223,519

6,494

Q06

North East London

5A4

Havering

247,642

8,924

5C2

Barking and Dagenham

176,497

6,546

5C3

City and Hackney Primary Care Team

260,413

8,676

5C4

Tower Hamlets Primary Care Team

223,888

9,812

5C5

Newham Primary Care Team

309,762

14,596

5NA

Redbridge

254,138

11,802

5NC

Waltham Forest

265,150

10,706

Q07

South East London

5A7

Bromley

317,407

10,084

5A8

Greenwich

262,226

8,072

5LD

Lambeth

339,304

10,179

5LE

Southwark

288,878

9,294

5LF

Lewisham

283,095

10,161

TAK

Bexley Care Trust

222,587

8,240

Q08

South West London

5A5

Kingston

180,952

5,478

5K9

Croydon

363,708

13,915

5LG

Wandsworth

322,855

9,410

5M6

Richmond and Twickenham

191,245

4,413

5M7

Sutton and Merton

396,922

13,406

Dietary Supplements: Channel Islands

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 10 July 2007, Official Report, column 1448W, on dietary supplements: Channel Islands, (1) what meetings are planned between the Food Standards Agency and the Bailiwicks of Guernsey and Jersey to discuss implementation of the food supplements directive and the Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation in the Channel Islands; (153011)

(2) whether the Food Standards Agency plans to raise at future meetings with the Bailiwicks of Guernsey and Jersey the implementation of the food supplements directive and the Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation.

The Food Standards Agency does not have any meetings planned to date with the Bailiwicks of Guernsey and Jersey to discuss implementation of the food supplements directive and the Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation in the Channel Islands.

The Food Standards Agency is writing to the Bailiwicks of Guernsey and Jersey, regarding the implementation of the food supplements directive and the Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation.

Doctors: Private Sector

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment his Department has made of the effects of independent sector treatment centres on the availability of junior doctor training posts. (152694)

The Department has made no such assessment. Training schedules for national health service staff in independent sector treatment centres (ISTCs) are agreed locally, subject to the meeting of accreditation standards. The number of junior doctor training posts available is based on local service requirements and future workforce planning needs in discussions with strategic health authorities, deaneries and trusts. When training is attached to activity, which is transferred from the NHS to a Wave 1 ISTC, junior doctors will complete the training in the ISTC.

All ISTCs in Wave 2 are required to provide training in up to 35 per cent. of clinical services that they provide for the NHS. This includes not only medical training, but also other clinical training such as nurse or Allied Health Professional training.

Doctors: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what information her Department provided to HM Treasury on the Medical Training Application Service prior to its introduction. (146406)

The Medical Training Application Service project was subject to the normal business approvals process. MTAS costs fell within delegated departmental approval limits so no specific information was supplied to HM Treasury.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which consultancy is involved in the processing of applications and appointments for hospital doctors’ training posts in the London Kent Survey and Sussex Unit of Application; when it was appointed; what the process of appointment was; and what the estimated cost of the work is. (151884)

Drugs: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much his Department has spent on tackling (a) drug and (b) alcohol dependency in each London borough in each of the last 10 years. (153559)

Since 2001, the Department and the Home Office have provided for drug treatment in the form of the pooled drug treatment budget (PTB). This funding is allocated to the 149 drug action teams across the country to use, along with local mainstream funding, to provide for treatment and services according to the specific needs of each locality. We do not have information on drug treatment spend prior to 2001.

It is for primary care trusts to determine the level of expenditure on alcohol services within their area in line with local priorities. Information is not collected centrally on local spend; however the Alcohol Needs Assessment Research Project found that around £217 million was being spend on alcohol services during 2003-04. Funds from the PTB may be spent on alcohol services provided that adequate progress is being made on drugs priorities.

PTB allocations since 2001 for each London borough is shown in the following table.

PTB channelled through PCT (£000)PTB channelled through PCT (£000)

DAT

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Barking and Dagenham

777

1,019

1,149

1,430

1,849

0.004808568

1,945

Barnet

955

1,205

1,309

1,576

2,030

0.005277353

2,210

Bexley

600

759

827

997

1,287

0.003345418

1,349

Brent

1,417

1,909

2,201

2,795

3,605

0.009372441

3,703

Bromley

716

901

978

1,175

1,510

0.003926924

1,728

Camden

2,017

2,466

2,599

3,033

3,914

0.010177088

4,401

City of London

14

23

31

44

58

0.000150157

69

Croydon

1,212

1,565

1,738

2,135

2,753

0.007156912

2,995

Ealing

1,794

2,135

2,188

2,480

3,195

0.008306342

3,622

Enfield

1,093

1,458

1,669

2,104

2,704

0.007030149

2,738

Greenwich

1,449

1,867

2,070

2,538

3,261

0.008479293

3,373

Hackney

2,112

2,749

3,077

3,806

4,920

0.012793309

5,197

Hammersmith and Fulham

1,340

1,616

1,679

1,931

2,500

0.006499001

2,955

Haringey

1,547

2,096

2,430

3,099

3,988

0.010369877

4,167

Harrow

542

689

754

914

1,185

0.003080281

1,365

Havering

566

711

770

924

1,192

0.003099463

1,280

Hillingdon

888

1,038

1,043

1,157

1,494

0.003883626

1,656

Hounslow

861

1,041

1,084

1,250

1,612

0.00419139

1,928

Islington

2,451

2,950

3,059

3,511

4,507

0.011718636

4,900

Kensington and Chelsea

1,817

1,999

1,999

2,099

2,699

0.007017021

2,973

Kingston upon Thames

658

725

725

761

977

0.002541271

1,092

Lambeth

2,439

3,266

3,748

4,739

6,083

0.015816438

6,425

Lewisham

2,023

2,586

2,847

3,468

4,469

0.011620522

4,604

Merton

804

949

964

1,081

1,389

0.003611393

1,567

Newham

2,164

2,984

3,509

4,529

5,801

0.015082032

5,835

Redbridge

678

929

1,087

1,398

1,798

0.004673789

1,933

Richmond upon Thames

687

756

756

793

1,021

0.002653966

1,233

Southwark

2,274

3,052

3,510

4,446

5,739

0.014920786

6,082

Sutton

568

662

664

733

940

0.002444265

1,143

Tower Hamlets

1,988

2,731

3,202

4,124

5,272

0.013709008

5,632

Waltham Forest

958

1,357

1,630

2,141

2,733

0.007104891

2,976

Wandsworth

1,663

2,000

2,073

2,378

3,063

0.007965414

3,383

Westminster

2,729

3,002

3,002

3,152

4,042

4,367

London total

43,801

55,195

60,371

72,741

93,590

0.010508613

100,826

Environment Protection: Dartmoor National Park

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if the Minister for the South West will make an early visit to the Holne Common in Dartmoor National Park to see the results of the Environmental Agency's action under its obligation under the Environmentally Sensitive Agreement 1999. (153663)

I am aware of the work undertaken by the Environmental Agency and others on Dartmoor. Owing to current diary pressures I am currently not able to accept the hon. Member’s kind invitation, but if he has particular concerns I would welcome his raising them with me in writing.

Eyesight: Testing

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many pensioners in York have had free eye tests since they were reintroduced. (152198)

The information is not centrally available in the format requested.

Data on the number of people aged 60 and over who have had a free national health service eye tests are collected at primary care trust (PCT) level, rather than by geographical area. Data for the former North Yorkshire health authority and York and Selby PCT are shown in the table.

Number of people aged 60 and over who have had NHS eye tests in North Yorkshire health authority and York and Selby PCT

Financial year

North Yorkshire HA

York and Selby PCT

1999-2000

52,072

2000-01

61,787

2001-02

68,855

2002-03

70,278

2003-04

26,254

2004-05

26,619

2005-06

25,057

April to September 20061

12,956

1 Total shown is for the period April to September 2006 only. October to March 2007 figures are due to be published on 31 July.

Source:

The Information Centre for health and social care.

Gender Identity Disorder

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the answer of 18 July 2007, Official Report, column 362W, on gender identity disorder, how many (a) men and (b) women from Wales received gender reassignment surgery to treat gender dysphoria from the national health service in England in each of the last 10 years. (153709)

Owing to the small number of treatment episodes involved and the need to protect patient confidentiality, the Department cannot disclose this information.

General Practitioners

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the evidential basis was for the statement by the right hon. Member for Leigh (Andy Burnham) of 26 June 2007, Official Report, column 160, on GP out-of-hours services, that the GP out-of-hours service was close to collapse in 1997. (147974)

It was clear from the rising number of complaints to the Health Service Commissioner that the previous model of provision by general practitioners (GPs) was not meeting patients’ expectations and was not sustainable.

In addition, the responsibility for out-of-hours care was affecting the ability to recruit and retain GPs.

General Practitioners: Passports

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether he has received reports of GPs levying a charge to countersign passports for patients; and whether his Department issues guidelines to GPs who charge fees to authenticate patients' passports for renewal applications. (151557)

The countersigning of passports is not part of the work that primary medical services contractors are required to do as part of their contractual arrangements with the Primary Care Trust. Should a general practitioner countersign an application it is a private matter between the doctor and the applicant. General practitioners may make a charge for this service should they wish.

The Department does not issue guidelines on this matter.

Health Professions: Qualifications

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether private-sector NHS contractors are required to ask for the same level of qualifications when recruiting staff as primary care trusts. (152902)

The qualification requirements for the employment of clinical staff in Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTCs) are the same as those in the national health service. Surgeons must be registered with the General Medical Council and be on the specialist register in the specialty in which they are trained.

While both the NHS and ISTCs require the same level of qualifications for clinical staff, the process in which they are appointed differs.

All health practitioners employed in ISTCs are required to be registered with the relevant professional body, and providers are required to ensure that there is a programme of continuing professional development.

Health Professions: Regulation

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what proportion of those attending her Department’s Call for Ideas event on medical and non-medical professional regulation in autumn 2005 were (a) from healthcare professional regulatory bodies, (b) lay members of healthcare professional regulatory bodies, (c) from public and patient representative organisations, (d) members of the public, (e) health officials, (f) from other health and social care regulators and (g) others. (146199)

The Department issued two Calls for Ideas in 2005. One was the Chief Medical Officer’s (CMO) “Call for Ideas” on the review of medical regulation and the other was by Andrew Foster, the then Director of Workforce, on the review of non-medical professional regulation. Neither of these were held as actual events. The CMO’s was published on the Department’s website, while Andrew Foster wrote to a range of stakeholders to seek their views. This included members of the non-medical review reference group, which met twice during the course of the review, in July and November 2005. The make-up of the group is as follows.

Percentage

Healthcare professional regulatory bodies

25

Lay members of healthcare professional regulatory bodies

6 (which is included in the above)

Public and patient representative organisations and members of the public

4.5

Health officials

14

Other health and social care regulators

3.5

Others

53

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what arrangements she expects to make for (a) periods of pre-legislative consultation and (b) provision of information and technical support to consultees on (i) forthcoming primary legislation on professional healthcare regulation and (ii) Orders in Council under section 60 of the Health Act 1999. (146200)

There has been extensive consultation leading up to the publication of the White Paper in February. The White Paper anticipated the need for new legislation on a number of issues. Some may require primary legislation but other changes can be made under section 60 of the Health Act 1999. The procedures for the latter require that a draft order is published and consulted upon at least three months before the amended order is laid before Parliament. Other matters requiring legislation will be considered by the stakeholder working groups which will be advising on implementation of the White Paper. We will be publishing their terms of reference and membership shortly.

Health Professions: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what analysis his Department has carried out on the reasons for the fall in the number of pre-registration training commissions from 2004-05 to 2005-06. (148820)

The numbers of pre-registration training commissions for most professions actually increased between 2004-05 and 2005-06 with the exception of nursing where numbers fell by about 1 per cent.

Workforce planning for the health service is challenging and complex and workforce needs are difficult to predict as technological advances and social changes lead to some skills becoming redundant while demand for others will suddenly increase.

Health Professions: York Hospitals NHS Trust

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many full-time equivalent (a) medical consultants, (b) other medical staff, (c) nurses, (d) other professional staff, (e) administrative and clerical staff and (f) auxiliary staff were employed by York NHS Trust in all areas, excluding those transferred to Selby and York Primary Care Trust, in each year since 1996-97. (151622)

The information requested is set out in the following table.

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services (HCHS): Medical and dental staff and non-medical staff1 within York Hospitals NHS Trust. Full-time equivalents at 30 September each year

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

All HCHS staff

3,596

3,660

3,504

3,517

3,732

3,224

2,842

3,111

3,247

3,302

3,519

All medical and dental staff

215

261

274

283

281

258

237

294

320

344

370

Medical and dental consultants

72

102

98

110

109

120

113

119

131

149

155

Other medical and dental staff

143

159

176

172

171

138

124

174

189

195

215

All non-medical staff1

3,381

3,399

3,230

3,234

3,451

2,967

2,605

2,817

2,927

2,958

3,149

Qualified nursing, midwifery and health visiting staff

1,310

1,362

1,235

1,268

1,375

1,132

915

948

990

1,023

1,111

Clerical and administrative

552

535

532

547

571

571

565

604

644

666

795

Nursing assistant/auxiliary

422

397

357

314

337

185

99

96

89

55

49

Others

1,098

1,106

1,106

1,105

1,168

1,078

1,027

1,170

1,204

1,215

1,194

1 More accurate validation processes in 2006 have resulted in the identification and removal of 9,858 duplicate non-medical staff records out of the total work force figure of 1.3 million in 2006. Earlier years’ figures could not be accurately validated in this way and so will be slightly inflated. The level of inflation in earlier years’ figures is estimated to be less than 1 per cent. of total across all non-medical staff groups for headcount figures (and negligible for full time equivalents). This should be taken into consideration when analysing trends over time.

Sources:

Information Centre for health and social care Non-Medical Workforce Census.

The Information Centre for health and social care Medical and Dental Workforce Census.

Health Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answers of 5 July 2007, Official Report, columns 1148-49W, on health services, what provision there is for public and patient members of the working groups on the White Paper to discuss issues distinct to the administration of health bodies in England. (153379)

The working groups have been formed to perform an advisory role in the implementation of the White Paper “Trust, assurance and safety”. This includes those elements of the White Paper relating to the administration of local health bodies in England such as primary care trust and national health service trusts.

Health Services: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what steps have been taken to allocate the £1 billion funding proposed in the Public Health White Paper between (a) health trainers, (b) sexual health services, (c) school nurses and (d) other services; and if he will make a statement; (152230)

(2) how much was allocated to each primary care trust for implementing the targets in the White Paper “Choosing Health”; and whether any of this funding was ring-fenced;

(3) what progress primary care trusts are making in delivering outcomes described in the White Paper “Choosing Health”; and if he will make a statement.

Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) were notified of their revenue allocations for 2006-07 and 2007-08 in February 2005. The allocations separately identify funding to support the initiatives set out in the White Paper “Choosing Health: Making healthy choices easier”, a copy of which is available in the Library.

There had been a move away from ring-fencing allocations to PCTs as it is for PCTs to determine how best to use the funds allocated to them to commission services to meet the needs of their local population.

The funding allocated to each PCT for implementing the targets in the White Paper “Choosing Health”, for the years 2006-07 and 2007-08 is provided in the following table.

£000

“Choosing Health” White Paper funding

PCT name

2006-07

2007-08

Ashton, Leigh and Wigan PCT

2,167

2,611

Barking and Dagenham PCT

1,303

1,570

Barnet PCT

1,024

2,032

Barnsley PCT

1,726

2,081

Bassetlaw PCT

356

707

Bath and North East Somerset PCT

533

1,056

Bedfordshire PCT

834

2,006

Berkshire East PCT

778

1,857

Berkshire West PCT

1,248

2,474

Bexley Care Trust

669

1,327

Birmingham East and North PCT

2,498

3,098

Blackburn with Darwen PCT

1,110

1,337

Blackpool PCT

1,096

1,320

Bolton PCT

1,870

2,254

Bournemouth and Poole PCT

1,082

2,142

Bradford and Airedale PCT

3,398

4,096

Brent Teaching PCT

712

1,696

Brighton and Hove City PCT

643

1,535

Bristol PCT

1,351

2,675

Bromley PCT

930

1,846

Buckinghamshire PCT

1,371

2,718

Bury PCT

1,196

1,440

Calderdale PCT

641

1,269

Cambridgeshire PCT

1,630

3,239

Camden PCT

631

1,516

Central and Eastern Cheshire PCT

946

2,266

Central Lancashire PCT

1,866

3,034

City and Hackney Teaching PCT

2,030

2,447

Cornwall and Isles of Scilly PCT

1,228

2,948

County Durham PCT

3,193

3,960

Coventry Teaching PCT

1,962

2,432

Croydon PCT

1,072

2,125

Cumbria PCT

2,822

3,753

Darlington PCT

235

562

Derby City PCT

886

1,757

Derbyshire County PCT

2,751

4,621

Devon PCT

2,285

4,543

Doncaster PCT

2,113

2,546

Dorset PCT

1,230

2,443

Dudley PCT

978

1,937

Ealing PCT

1,078

2,133

East and North Hertfordshire PCT

1,615

3,208

East Lancashire PCT

2,625

3,162

East Riding of Yorkshire PCT

646

1,553

East Sussex Downs and Weald PCT

749

1,794

Eastern and Coastal Kent PCT

1,804

4,197

Enfield PCT

645

1,543

Gateshead PCT

1,486

1,789

Gloucestershire PCT

1,729

3,433

Great Yarmouth and Waveney PCT

683

1,458

Greenwich Teaching PCT

1,740

2,098

Halton and St. Helens PCT

2,282

2,749

Hammersmith and Fulham PCT

1,276

1,537

Hampshire PCT

2,865

6,431

Haringey Teaching PCT

1,505

1,865

Harrow PCT

434

1,037

Hartlepool PCT

700

843

Hastings and Rother PCT

629

1,249

Havering PCT

787

1,560

Heart of Birmingham Teaching PCT

1,890

2,345

Herefordshire PCT

556

1,105

Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale PCT

1,515

1,825

Hillingdon PCT

767

1,522

Hounslow PCT

737

1,459

Hull PCT

1,615

2,000

Isle of Wight NHS PCT

502

999

Islington PCT

1,347

1,672

Kensington and Chelsea PCT

664

1,327

Kingston PCT

477

947

Kirklees PCT

1,249

2,475

Knowsley PCT

1,318

1,587

Lambeth PCT

1,812

2,246

Leeds PCT

1,687

4,028

Leicester City PCT

2,079

2,504

Leicestershire County and Rutland PCT

1,773

3,524

Lewisham PCT

1,558

1,931

Lincolnshire PCT

2,944

4,759

Liverpool PCT

3,345

4,146

Luton PCT

432

1,033

Manchester PCT

3,988

4,805

Medway PCT

834

1,661

Mid Essex PCT

983

1,956

Middlesbrough PCT

1,105

1,330

Milton Keynes PCT

677

1,351

Newcastle PCT

1,948

2,345

Newham PCT

2,211

2,665

Norfolk PCT

1,598

3,835

North East Essex PCT

1,036

2,060

North East Lincolnshire PCT

1,081

1,302

North Lancashire PCT

1,522

2,340

North Lincolnshire PCT

505

1,003

North Somerset PCT

617

1,227

North Staffordshire PCT

466

1,114

North Tees PCT

1,235

1,489

North Tyneside PCT

1,408

1,696

North Yorkshire and York PCT

2,011

4,224

Northamptonshire PCT

2,900

4,345

Northumberland Care Trust

2,046

2,465

Nottingham City PCT

1,741

2,158

Nottinghamshire County PCT

1,714

3,691

Oldham PCT

1,618

1,949

Oxfordshire PCT

1,717

3,414

Peterborough PCT

544

1,090

Plymouth Teaching PCT

826

1,638

Portsmouth City Teaching PCT

428

1,022

Redbridge PCT

751

1,489

Redcar and Cleveland PCT

979

1,179

Richmond and Twickenham PCT

510

1,013

Rotherham PCT

1,723

2,076

Salford PCT

1,761

2,120

Sandwell PCT

2,258

2,718

Sefton PCT

817

1,790

Sheffield PCT

1,272

3,035

Shropshire County PCT

870

1,728

Solihull Care Trust

439

1,049

Somerset PCT

1,604

3,190

South Birmingham PCT

2,057

2,551

South East Essex PCT

747

1,790

South Gloucestershire PCT

657

1,307

South Staffordshire PCT

2,160

3,609

South Tyneside PCT

1,173

1,413

South West Essex PCT

1,276

2,536

Southampton City PCT

787

1,560

Southwark PCT

1,697

2,103

Stockport PCT

901

1,783

Stoke on Trent PCT

1,594

1,975

Suffolk PCT

1,759

3,495

Sunderland Teaching PCT

2,117

2,549

Surrey PCT

3,032

6,011

Sutton and Merton PCT

1,131

2,244

Swindon PCT

578

1,147

Tameside and Glossop PCT

1,598

1,925

Telford and Wrekin PCT

514

1,022

Torbay Care Trust

509

1,012

Tower Hamlets PCT

1,925

2,321

Trafford PCT

696

1,378

Wakefield District PCT

2,350

2,833

Walsall Teaching PCT

1,780

2,144

Waltham Forest PCT

824

1,631

Wandsworth PCT

897

1,775

Warrington PCT

1,221

1,471

Warwickshire PCT

2,147

3,373

West Essex PCT

802

1,592

West Hertfordshire PCT

1,579

3,130

West Kent PCT

1,928

3,825

West Sussex PCT

2,295

4,660

Western Cheshire PCT

558

1,336

Westminster PCT

832

1,665

Wiltshire PCT

1,279

2,543

Wirral PCT

2,007

2,490

Wolverhampton City PCT

1,769

2,130

Worcestershire PCT

1,643

3,263

England

210,500

341,500

A Choosing Health progress report was published earlier this year and is available at the Department’s website at

www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH074286

It shows that we have made significant progress over a wide range of areas and have created drivers for change through better engagement across systems and organisations, better information and new tools and techniques to support individual action to improve health. Two years through this three-year programme, examples of progress include the following:

Smokefree legislation was implemented on 1 July 2007

80 per cent. of people are now seen within 48 hours at a GUM clinic compared to 38 per cent. in 2004.

PCTs have played their part in these improvements in public health.

Health Services: Multiple Sclerosis

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment he has made of the effect of changes in inspection fees for charitable multiple sclerosis treatment centres. (151072)

Annual fees to cover the cost of providing assessment and registration services are approved by the Secretary of State, after consideration of proposals submitted by the Healthcare Commission (HC). Assessment of the effects of fees is therefore for the Commission in the first instance.

The HC on its 2007-08 independent healthcare sector fee proposals between 20 December 2006 and 20 February 2007. We understand from the chairman of the commission that during the consultation period it received numerous representations from providers asking that fees should be reduced for voluntarily funded establishments.

The HC revised its proposals after considering the comments it received. For 2007-08, annual fees for multiple sclerosis therapy centres have been reduced from £1,566 to £1,225, a reduction of 22 per cent. This is the first time that regulatory fees under the Care Standards Act 2000 have been reduced. Fees for first time registrations have increased from £907 to £990.

Health Services: Prisons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment he has made of the availability of primary care services to prison establishments during night periods; and if he will make a statement. (153681)

Information on the coverage of health care in prisons is not collected centrally. It is for primary care trusts, working in partnership with prisons, to commission the arrangements for out of hours cover.

Local prisons do usually contain 24-hour health facilities with nursing cover. For example, all prisons in London (with the exception of HMP Latchmere House) have healthcare beds with 24-hour nursing services available.

Out-of-hours medical cover is usually provided by an on-call arrangement with local general practitioners as part of a General Medical Services contract.

Health Services: Public Appointments

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when the competition for selection of the new chief executive of Connecting for Health will open; who will sit on the selection panel; what the starting salary for the post will be; and how bonuses for the post will be (a) set, (b) calculated and (c) paid. (151938)

Health Services: South East Region

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps he is taking to ensure that local primary care trusts are helped to engage with strategic planning organisations on long-term major regeneration programmes in (a) the Thames Gateway, (b) East London and (c) the London borough of Newham. (149777)

The Department’s London regional team and their London strategic health authority colleagues support the involvement of local national health service organisations in major regeneration initiatives within the Thames Gateway and East London areas, and the major developments in Newham for the Olympic and Paralympic Games.

London’s primary care trusts (PCTs) jointly fund with the London Development Agency the Healthy Urban Development Unit, which offers practical help to all PCTs in London, including Newham PCT. The aim is to significantly improve the health of Londoners by developing partnerships that enable health organisations to engage early, influencing the plan- making process, and have a positive effect on the outcomes of planning applications.

Health Trainers

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what progress has been made on the introduction of health trainers; and in which primary care trusts they have been employed. (152229)

Progress on the introduction of health trainers to date has been good:

as forecast and planned, 1,200 health trainers have been trained and are in post as of 2006-07 year end;

competences have been signed off and exemplar job descriptions have been developed for tailoring by local health trainer partnerships;

a national implementation team has been put in place and now provides full regional coverage;

local training programmes have been developed and local evaluation has been put in place;

national accreditation has been developed, with support from technical advisers Skills for Health, to provide City and Guilds Level 3 and Royal Institute for Public Health Level 2 awards;

prisons have begun to introduce health trainers to the system, with around 80 health trainers now in place;

the Army expects to have trained 450 physical training instructor as health trainers by December 2007, with plans for a further 2,000 personnel to receive training in 2008;

Royal Mail plans to train some of their first aid staff as workplace health trainers;

the programme is also working with organisations such as Asda, Marks & Spencer, National Pharmacies and Football Foundation, and;

The Minister of State for Public Health (Dawn Primarolo) presented the first workplace Health Trainer certificate to Audrey Carlin, of T Allen Stockholder Ltd., on 3 July 2007.

Health trainers are employed in a variety of settings and the plurality of employment models means that we do not collect data by individual primary care trust.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many health trainers there are in (a) Southampton primary care trust, (b) Hampshire primary care trust and (c) Portsmouth primary care trust. (152231)

The Department has been informed by the following primary care trusts that

Southampton primary care trust has 14 health trainers recruited and in training.

Hampshire primary care trust has 12 health trainers recruited and in training.

Portsmouth primary care trust has 11 health trainers recruited and in training.

Health: Disadvantaged

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what progress has been made in tackling health deprivation in the spearhead primary care trusts. (152237)

The 2010 inequalities targets for life expectancy, cardiovascular disease and cancer are based on narrowing the gap in mortality between the population as a whole and the fifth of local authority areas with the worst health and deprivation indicators (the spearhead group), and the primary care trusts that map to them, by 2010.

Life expectancy has increased for both males and females for England as a whole but it has improved more slowly in the spearhead areas. In England, average life expectancy for males is 76.9 and for females 81.1; in the spearhead group it is 74.9 for males and 79.6 for females. The slower rate of improvement in has led to a widening of the relative gap in life expectancy between England and the spearhead group. The latest data for 2003-05 show that the average life expectancy in the spearhead group was 2.61 per cent. lower than the England average for males, and 1.91 per cent. lower than the England average for females. Therefore, the relative gap has widened by 2 per cent. for men and 8 per cent. for women since the baseline (1995-97).

However, although the 2010 target for life expectancy is a challenging one, data for 2003-05 also show that some 60 per cent. of the 70 spearhead areas are on track to narrow their own life expectancy gap with that of England by 10 per cent. by 2010, compared to baseline for either males or females or both. The information is set out in the following table, with comparison data for 2002-04.

Data for 2003-05 have also shown continued improvements in CVD and cancer mortality inequalities between spearhead areas and the national average since the 1995-97 baseline. The absolute gap from circulatory disease has narrowed by 27.9 per cent., and we are on track to meet the 2010 target of at least a 40 per cent. reduction, There has been a 12.7 per cent. reduction in the absolute cancer inequality gap.

Targeted assistance to spearhead areas is being provided through a variety of programmes such as Communities for Health, Health Trainers, Life Check and smoking cessation as well as programmes on cancer, coronary heart disease and primary care.

The following table shows whether the 70 spearhead local authorities are on or off track to narrow their share of the life expectancy gap by 10 per cent. for males or females or both by 2010 according to 2003-05 data. The table also shows a comparison to 2002-04.

Spearhead Group performance on life expectancy for males and females 2003-05 v. 2002-04

2003-05

2002-04

On track both

On track male

On track female

Off track both

On track both

On track male

On track female

Off track both

Hackney

Yes

Yes

Hammersmith and Fulham

Yes

Yes

Southwark

Yes

Yes

Tower Hamlets

Yes

Yes

Tameside

Yes

Yes

Warrington

Yes

Yes

Derwentside

Yes

Yes

Hyndburn

Yes

Yes

Islington

Yes

Yes

Lambeth

Yes

Yes

Lewisham

Yes

Yes

Newham

Yes

Yes

Knowsley

Yes

Yes

St. Helens

Yes

Yes

Wirral

Yes

Yes

Sunderland

Yes

Yes

Halton

Yes

Yes

Blackburn with Darwen

Yes

Yes

Chester-le-Street

Yes

Yes

Sedgefield

Yes

Yes

Wear Valley

Yes

Yes

Burnley

Yes

Yes

Lincoln

Yes

Yes

Wansbeck

Yes

Yes

Tamworth

Yes

Yes

Greenwich

Yes

Yes

Haringey

Yes

Yes

Bury

Yes

Yes

Doncaster

Yes

Yes

Gateshead

Yes

Yes

Newcastle upon Tyne

Yes

Yes

North Tyneside

Yes

Yes

Birmingham

Yes

Yes

Coventry

Yes

Yes

Walsall

Yes

Yes

Redcar and Cleveland

Yes

Yes

Stockton-on-Tees

Yes

Yes

Barrow-in-Furness

Yes

Yes

Carlisle

Yes

Yes

Corby

Yes

Yes

Blyth Valley

Yes

Yes

Nuneaton and Bedworth

Yes

Yes

Barking and Dagenham

Yes

Yes

Bolton

Yes

Yes

Manchester

Yes

Yes

Oldham

Yes

Yes

Rochdale

Yes

Yes

Salford

Yes

Yes

Wigan

Yes

Yes

Liverpool

Yes

Yes

Barnsley

Yes

Yes

Rotherham

Yes

Yes

South Tyneside

Yes

Yes

Sandwell

Yes

Yes

Wolverhampton

Yes

Yes

Bradford

Yes

Yes

Wakefield

Yes

Yes

Hartlepool

Yes

Yes

Middlesbrough

Yes

Yes

Blackpool

Yes

Yes

Kingston upon Hull, City of

Yes

Yes

North East Lincolnshire

Yes

Yes

Leicester

Yes

Yes

Nottingham

Yes

Yes

Stoke-on-Trent

Yes

Yes

Bolsover

Yes

Yes

Easington

Yes

Yes

Pendle

Yes

Yes

Preston

Yes

Yes

Rossendale

Yes

Yes

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what recent assessment he has made of the progress towards the pledge to reduce health inequalities measured by infant mortality by 2010. (152252)

The most recent assessment of progress against the infant mortality aspect of the 2010 health inequalities target shows a slight narrowing of the health inequalities gap between the routine and manual group and the rest of the population for 2003-05, compared to 2002-04 and 2001-03. Infant mortality rates are at an all-time low for both groups. However, at 18 per cent. the gap is still wider than the 13 per cent. at the 1997-99 target baseline.

A further update on the infant mortality gap will be available later this year in the 2007 edition of ‘Tackling Health Inequalities: Status Report on the Programme for Action’.

Health: Nutrition

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps he is taking to tackle (a) overweight and obesity and (b) underweight in the adult population. (153404)

Present action to tackle obesity in adults includes the care pathways for national health service primary care professionals and a self-help guide, ‘Your Weight, Your Health’; the National Heart Forum's toolkit ‘Lightening the Load: tackling overweight and obesity’; work on foods high in salt, fat and sugar; front-of-pack labelling as an easy-to-understand way of helping individuals and families to make healthier food choices; the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire; Local Exercise Action Pilots; and the National Step-0-Meter Programme.

We will also continue to work closely with the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence to support dissemination and implementation of its guidance on physical activity public health intervention and on the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children.

Regarding steps to tackle underweight, Government advice is that people should consume a healthy balanced diet, which includes a wide variety of foods, is low in fat, and is based on plenty of fruit and vegetables and starchy foods such as potatoes, bread, and other cereals. The diet should contain moderate amounts of meat, fish, meat alternatives, milk and dairy products and sparing or infrequent amounts of foods containing fat/foods and drinks containing sugar. Eating a balanced diet in combination with physical activity should enable people to maintain a healthy weight.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate he has made of the percentage of adults aged 16 years and over (a) in England and (b) in each primary care trust area who had a body mass index (i) in excess of 30 and (ii) of less than 18.5 in each year since 1997, broken down by age. (153405)

The information is not available in the format requested. Data on prevalence of different body mass index (BMI) values among adults aged 16 and over are available from the health survey for England. Data on the percentage of men and women in England with a body BMI of over 30 and under 18.5 are presented in Table 1, copies of which have been placed in the Library. Data are shown for the years 1997 to 2005 and are broken down by age group and gender.

Hearing Impairment

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what the average waiting time for a hearing test was in (a) Surrey, (b) Oxfordshire and (c) England in (i) 1997, (ii) 1998, (iii) 1999, (iv) 2000, (v) 2001, (vi) 2002, (vii) 2003, (viii) 2004, (ix) 2005 and (x) 2006; (152996)

(2) what the average time interval between receiving a hearing test and the fitting of a hearing aid was in (a) Surrey, (b) Oxfordshire and (c) England in (i) 1997, (ii) 1998, (iii) 1999, (iv) 2000, (v) 2001, (vi) 2002, (vii) 2003, (viii) 2004, (ix) 2005 and (x) 2006;

(3) what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the procurement of audiology service pathways from the private sector; and if he will make a statement;

(4) what assessment he has made of the procedures for the referral of NHS patients to the independent sector for the fitting of hearing aids; and if he will make a statement;

(5) what assessment his Department has made of the fitting of hearing aids by the independent sector following the abolition of the Hearing Aid Council; and if he will make a statement.

The Department does not collect data on waiting times for fitting of digital hearing aids. Since January 2006, the Department has been collecting data on the waiting times for audiology assessments. The latest figures, for May 2007, indicate that there are currently 1,322 people waiting over 13 weeks for assessments in Surrey and 13 people waiting over 13 weeks for assessments in Oxfordshire. In England as of May 2007, 73,381 people are waiting over 13 weeks for an assessment.

A National Framework Contract Public Private Partnership with David Ormerod Hearing Centres and Ultravox Holdings plc was in place from October 2003 until March 2007. It was fundamental to the National Framework Contract that the quality of service, and hearing aid, that the patient received mirrored those of the local NHS audiology department. Quality assurance was key in the initiative. Both companies demonstrated their commitment to meeting these standards and invested resources in terms of equipment, IT and staff training in order to do so.

Further independent sector capacity for audiology has been procured as part of the Phase 2 Diagnostics Procurement. Providers are subject to ongoing audit and must meet stringent key performance indicators through the delivery of the contract. Independent sector capacity is utilised at a local level alongside NHS capacity and is subject to the same standards and referral procedures.

The Hearing Aid Council, which is responsible for standards of professional practice, remains in operation and is working towards transferring its regulatory functions to other bodies in advance of its abolition.

Henderson Hospital: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the budget for Henderson hospital is in 2007-08; and what the proposed budget for the hospital is for 2008-09. (150999)

Revenue allocations are made directly to primary care trusts (PCTs), not national health service trusts or individual hospitals. NHS trusts receive most of their income through the commissioning arrangements they have with PCTs.

We understand that the Henderson hospital is managed by South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust. We would advise the hon. Member to contact the chairman of the trust for information about the hospital budget. The contact details are:

John Rafferty

Chairman

South West London and St. George's Mental Health NHS Trust

Springfield University Hospital

61 Glenburnie Road

London

SW17 7DJ

Telephone: 020 8672 9911

Hip Replacements and Knee Replacements

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average waiting time for (a) hip replacements and (b) knee replacements on the NHS was in each of the last five years. (151485)

Information on the median time waited for hip and knee replacement is set out in the following table.

Median days waited for hip and knee replacements 2001-02 to 2005-06

Hip replacements

Knee replacements

2001-02

220

276

2002-03

229

280

2003-04

217

252

2004-05

182

202

2005-06

158

168

Source: Hospital Episode Statistics, The Information Centre for health and social care.

HIV Infection: Pregnancy

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate he has made of levels of transmission from mother to baby of HIV/AIDS in each of the last five years; in what proportion of cases transmission took place (a) at birth and (b) subsequent to birth; what treatments are available in each case; what assessment he has made of the merits of testing all pregnant women for HIV/AIDS at an early stage of their pregnancy; and if he will make a statement. (152601)

Information on the number of babies born in the United Kingdom and confirmed infected with HIV from 2002 to 2006 is shown in the following table.

Number of babies born in the UK and confirmed infected with HIV, 2002-2006

Year of birth

Maternal diagnosis before or at around time of delivery

Infected children born to undiagnosed women

Total infected

2002

12

24

36

2003

6

19

25

2004

10

20

30

2005

13

14

27

2006

8

9

17

Total

49

86

135

Note:

Data include reports received by end of June 2007 and are subject to reporting delay.

Source:

National Study of HIV in Pregnancy and Childhood, Institute of Child Health, University College London

It is not possible to assess accurately what proportion of transmissions occurred prior to birth, at birth and after birth during this period. In utero transmission is uncommon, and most transmissions occur during labour and delivery, or through breastfeeding. Infant samples need to be taken within 48 hours of birth to make inferences about timing of transmission, and since the majority of infected infants were born to undiagnosed women, sufficient samples were not available.

If the woman is diagnosed before or during pregnancy, she can be offered:

antiretroviral therapy in pregnancy, at delivery, and for the infant after birth;

appropriate management of delivery, e.g. planned caesarean section; and

advice not to breastfeed.

If the woman is diagnosed at or shortly after delivery, the infant can still be offered antiretroviral therapy starting as soon as possible after birth, and the woman can still be advised not to breastfeed, both of which will reduce the risk of transmission if the baby was not already infected in utero.

Since the introduction of the routine recommendation of antenatal HIV testing in 2000, the majority of infected pregnant women have been diagnosed prior to delivery. In 2005, the latest year for which data are available, about 95 per cent. of infected pregnant women were diagnosed before delivery. During the 1990s, before antenatal testing was routine, the majority of infected women remained undiagnosed at delivery and therefore appropriate treatment and advice could not be offered.

Home Care Services: Oxygen

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many complaints Ministers received about domiciliary oxygen services in each of the last 18 months. (151016)

The number of items of correspondence received by the Department from hon. Members and the public concerning the home oxygen service in the last 18 months is shown in the following table. Not all were letters of complaint but to identify these separately would incur disproportionate cost.

Month and year

Items of correspondence

2006

January

3

February

61

March

77

April

32

May

30

June

20

July

50

August

36

September

15

October

11

November

4

December

1

2007

January

9

February

3

March

13

April

3

May

1

June

3

Total

372

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much was spent on the domiciliary oxygen service in (a) England, (b) each strategic health authority and (c) each health trust in the year preceding the introduction of the new domiciliary oxygen service. (152973)

Expenditure on the home oxygen service prior to the introduction of the new service was not collected centrally.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment he has made of the implications of the changed arrangements for home oxygen therapy for (a) waiting times, (b) patient safety and (c) emergency supply; and if he will make a statement. (153628)

Primary care trusts (PCTs) are responsible for managing the home oxygen service locally, including assessing how the new arrangements relate to waiting times, patient safety and emergency supply.

PCTs have access, on the home oxygen website, to a clinical assessment services commissioning framework, which outlines how these services, together with the new home oxygen service, can help reduce waiting times while supporting patients in managing their symptoms at home.

Under the terms of the contract, all suppliers are required to provide information and training on the safe and effective use of oxygen equipment provided to patients and their families. Suppliers also make clear to patients the dangers of using oxygen if they continue to smoke or use equipment close to fires or other naked flames. Suppliers are required to report any incident involving patient safety to PCTs. It is for PCTs to report all serious incidents and to take any appropriate follow-up action, whether reported by a supplier, health care professional or a patient, to strategic health authorities and the National Patient Safety Agency.

From national service data provided by suppliers, I am able to confirm that all new suppliers are meeting the response time target 99 per cent. of the time for emergency supply. This is a priority service and, under the terms of the contract, all suppliers are required to supply oxygen at home within four hours of receiving an order for emergency supply.

Homeopathy

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what consultations were carried out with (a) the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital, (b) patient representatives and (c) representatives of practising homoeopaths prior to the decision to change funding for the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital; (152796)

(2) what homoeopathic services will be available to the residents of Brent following changes in funding for treatment at the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital.

This is a local matter. The homoeopathic hospitals in the United Kingdom fall under the jurisdiction of the national health service in the area in which they are based. Any decisions on the services that any of these hospitals provide are the responsibility of those NHS healthcare organisations.

Hospital Beds

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many beds there were per capita for (a) acute medicine, (b) general surgery, (c) orthopaedics, (d) maternity and (e) paediatrics in each (i) strategic health authority and (ii) primary care trust in England in each of the last 10 years; and what projections he has made of bed numbers in future years. (151464)

Provider data by strategic health authority are shown in the following tables. Commissioner data are not collected centrally.

Total: Beds per capita

SHA

1997-98

1998-99

1999-2000

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

Q01

Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire SHA

0.00432

0.00419

0.00415

0.00416

0.00411

0.00404

0.00404

0.00391

0.00364

Q02

Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire SHA

0.00255

0.00244

0.00240

0.00271

0.00268

0.00280

0.00276

0.00281

0.00270

Q03

Essex Strategic HA

0.00341

0.00343

0.00337

0.00329

0.00333

0.00326

0.00308

0.00311

0.00313

Q04

North West London Strategic HA

0.00481

0.00483

0.00425

0.00411

0.00400

0.00395

0.00378

0.00383

0.00367

Q05

North Central London Strategic HA

0.00575

0.00547

0.00508

0.00519

0.00493

0.00514

0.00503

0.00516

0.00504

Q06

North East London Strategic HA

0.00504

0.00484

0.00441

0.00426

0.00417

0.00417

0.00409

0.00403

0.00386

Q07

South East London Strategic HA

0.00433

0.00415

0.00404

0.00404

0.00401

0.00400

0.00407

0.00408

0.00394

Q08

South West London Strategic HA

0.00373

0.00378

0.00400

0.00401

0.00394

0.00358

0.00382

0.00371

0.00357

Q09

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear Strategic HA

0.00556

0.00542

0.00535

0.00532

0.00531

0.00530

0.00526

0.00517

0.00508

Q10

County Durham and Tees Valley SHA

0.00466

0.00471

0.00466

0.00473

0.00463

0.00452

0.00454

0.00440

0.00431

Q11

North & East Yorkshire & N Lincs SHA

0.00365

0.00348

0.00338

0.00335

0.00333

0.00338

0.00333

0.00328

0.00323

Q12

West Yorkshire Strategic HA

0.00462

0.00449

0.00442

0.00442

0.00439

0.00425

0.00430

0.00388

0.00369

Q13

Cumbria and Lancashire Strategic HA

0.00470

0.00450

0.00436

0.00431

0.00416

0.00410

0.00405

0.00390

0.00376

Q14

Greater Manchester Strategic HA

0.00480

0.00466

0.00467

0.00451

0.00468

0.00442

0.00443

0.00428

0.00419

Q15

Cheshire & Merseyside Strategic HA

0.00402

0.00405

0.00417

0.00427

0.00436

0.00430

0.00433

0.00430

0.00417

Q16

Thames Valley Strategic HA

0.00313

0.00308

0.00301

0.00295

0.00275

0.00294

0.00298

0.00296

0.00289

Q17

Hampshire And Isle of Wight Strategic HA

0.00349

0.00342

0.00336

0.00344

0.00332

0.00334

0.00332

0.00338

0.00311

Q18

Kent and Medway Strategic HA

0.00347

0.00327

0.00329

0.00317

0.00310

0.00304

0.00308

0.00307

0.00289

Q19

Surrey and Sussex Strategic HA

0.00385

0.00377

0.00354

0.00350

0.00358

0.00362

0.00360

0.00335

0.00321

Q20

Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire SHA

0.00433

0.00424

0.00414

0.00402

0.00402

0.00409

0.00393

0.00388

0.00388

Q21

South West Peninsula Strategic HA

0.00429

0.00415

0.00411

0.00402

0.00378

0.00373

0.00390

0.00382

0.00370

Q22

Dorset and Somerset Strategic HA

0.00432

0.00420

0.00416

0.00419

0.00422

0.00425

0.00417

0.00407

0.00395

Q23

South Yorkshire Strategic HA

0.00465

0.00480

0.00473

0.00480

0.00488

0.00499

0.00493

0.00500

0.00492

Q24

Trent Strategic HA

0.00382

0.00379

0.00382

0.00373

0.00359

0.00350

0.00366

0.00356

0.00342

Q25

Leics, Northants and Rutland SHA

0.00345

0.00341

0.00339

0.00354

0.00343

0.00359

0.00358

0.00346

0.00335

Q26

Shropshire and Staffordshire SHA

0.00364

0.00373

0.00369

0.00357

0.00352

0.00341

0.00344

0.00340

0.00325

Q27

Birmingham and the Black Country SHA

0.00425

0.00428

0.00416

0.00423

0.00424

0.00426

0.00427

0.00420

0.00418

Q28

West Midlands South Strategic HA

0.00351

0.00337

0.00338

0.00338

0.00335

0.00325

0.00314

0.00318

0.00314

England

0.00413

0.00405

0.00396

0.00395

0.00390

0.00387

0.00387

0.00380

0.00368

Acute: Beds per capita

SHA

1997-98

1998-99

1999-2000

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

Q01

Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire SHA

0.00215

0.00213

0.00212

0.00215

0.00213

0.00214

0.00219

0.00212

0.00198

Q02

Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire SHA

0.00099

0.00100

0.00100

0.00122

0.00128

0.00126

0.00129

0.00139

0.00127

Q03

Essex Strategic HA

0.00148

0.00146

0.00147

0.00149

0.00147

0.00149

0.00153

0.00151

0.00152

Q04

North West London Strategic HA

0.00259

0.00266

0.00240

0.00222

0.00219

0.00215

0.00215

0.00219

0.00207

Q05

North Central London Strategic HA

0.00312

0.00299

0.00287

0.00281

0.00271

0.00268

0.00277

0.00269

0.00263

Q06

North East London Strategic HA

0.00238

0.00233

0.00216

0.00222

0.00224

0.00225

0.00227

0.00221

0.00221

Q07

South East London Strategic HA

0.00232

0.00226

0.00225

0.00227

0.00221

0.00210

0.00209

0.00205

0.00193

Q08

South West London Strategic HA

0.00195

0.00193

0.00215

0.00214

0.00215

0.00203

0.00211

0.00217

0.00213

Q09

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear Strategic HA

0.00276

0.00276

0.00276

0.00274

0.00276

0.00274

0.00275

0.00273

0.00275

Q10

County Durham and Tees Valley SHA

0.00265

0.00262

0.00259

0.00259

0.00249

0.00241

0.00246

0.00239

0.00233

Q11

North & East Yorkshire & N Lincs SHA

0.00202

0.00190

0.00189

0.00192

0.00191

0.00197

0.00196

0.00195

0.00194

Q12

West Yorkshire Strategic HA

0.00249

0.00244

0.00242

0.00243

0.00238

0.00231

0.00229

0.00221

0.00216

Q13

Cumbria and Lancashire Strategic HA

0.00242

0.00247

0.00239

0.00243

0.00232

0.00232

0.00230

0.00221

0.00220

Q14

Greater Manchester Strategic HA

0.00283

0.00282

0.00282

0.00280

0.00283

0.00278

0.00282

0.00279

0.00271

Q15

Cheshire & Merseyside Strategic HA

0.00251

0.00251

0.00260

0.00267

0.00269

0.00270

0.00271

0.00276

0.00267

Q16

Thames Valley Strategic HA

0.00190

0.00186

0.00181

0.00165

0.00182

0.00185

0.00185

0.00185

0.00181

Q17

Hampshire And Isle Of Wight Strategic HA

0.00187

0.00181

0.00178

0.00191

0.00192

0.00195

0.00200

0.00201

0.00184

Q18

Kent and Medway Strategic HA

0.00167

0.00167

0.00169

0.00170

0.00162

0.00153

0.00155

0.00157

0.00154

Q19

Surrey and Sussex Strategic HA

0.00188

0.00183

0.00170

0.00177

0.00184

0.00182

0.00192

0.00184

0.00181

Q20

Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire SHA

0.00232

0.00240

0.00240

0.00233

0.00234

0.00243

0.00244

0.00244

0.00258

Q21

South West Peninsula Strategic HA

0.00243

0.00245

0.00248

0.00250

0.00261

0.00258

0.00261

0.00257

0.00251

Q22

Dorset and Somerset Strategic HA

0.00221

0.00216

0.00216

0.00215

0.00214

0.00215

0.00223

0.00218

0.00215

Q23

South Yorkshire Strategic HA

0.00278

0.00288

0.00281

0.00283

0.00293

0.00308

0.00297

0.00302

0.00305

Q24

Trent Strategic HA

0.00212

0.00212

0.00217

0.00211

0.00202

0.00196

0.00194

0.00191

0.00186

Q25

Leics, Northants and Rutland SHA

0.00191

0.00192

0.00196

0.00194

0.00191

0.00199

0.00195

0.00190

0.00194

Q26

Shropshire and Staffordshire SHA

0.00177

0.00184

0.00183

0.00189

0.00190

0.00185

0.00185

0.00184

0.00179

Q27

Birmingham and the Black Country SHA

0.00252

0.00255

0.00255

0.00259

0.00260

0.00266

0.00262

0.00269

0.00269

Q28

West Midlands South Strategic HA

0.00199

0.00198

0.00200

0.00197

0.00206

0.00214

0.00205

0.00205

0.00204

England

0.00222

0.00221

0.00219

0.00219

0.00219

0.00219

0.00220

0.00219

0.00214

Maternity: Beds per capita

SHA

1997-98

1998-99

1999-2000

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

Q01

Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire SHA

0.00020

0.00019

0.00019

0.00019

0.00018

0.00017

0.00015

0.00015

0.00014

Q02

Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire SHA

0.00016

0.00015

0.00015

0.00019

0.00018

0.00017

0.00017

0.00017

0.00018

Q03

Essex Strategic HA

0.00022

0.00020

0.00020

0.00018

0.00018

0.00016

0.00016

0.00014

0.00015

Q04

North West London Strategic HA

0.00030

0.00028

0.00028

0.00021

0.00021

0.00019

0.00018

0.00019

0.00018

Q05

North Central London Strategic HA

0.00028

0.00028

0.00027

0.00025

0.00025

0.00021

0.00022

0.00022

0.00022

Q06

North East London Strategic HA

0.00032

0.00031

0.00028

0.00024

0.00026

0.00023

0.00023

0.00023

0.00023

Q07

South East London Strategic HA

0.00024

0.00023

0.00023

0.00023

0.00022

0.00022

0.00023

0.00021

0.00022

Q08

South West London Strategic HA

0.00020

0.00020

0.00020

0.00021

0.00022

0.00020

0.00020

0.00019

0.00019

Q09

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear Strategic HA

0.00025

0.00024

0.00021

0.00020

0.00018

0.00019

0.00018

0.00018

0.00018

Q10

County Durham and Tees Valley SHA

0.00028

0.00026

0.00024

0.00023

0.00021

0.00020

0.00019

0.00019

0.00019

Q11

North & East Yorkshire & N Lincs SHA

0.00020

0.00019

0.00019

0.00019

0.00021

0.00018

0.00018

0.00018

0.00017

Q12

West Yorkshire Strategic HA

0.00024

0.00024

0.00023

0.00021

0.00023

0.00022

0.00022

0.00020

0.00018

Q13

Cumbria and Lancashire Strategic HA

0.00022

0.00021

0.00020

0.00020

0.00020

0.00019

0.00020

0.00020

0.00018

Q14

Greater Manchester Strategic HA

0.00029

0.00026

0.00026

0.00025

0.00025

0.00024

0.00024

0.00022

0.00021

Q15

Cheshire & Merseyside Strategic HA

0.00022

0.00020

0.00021

0.00019

0.00021

0.00020

0.00019

0.00019

0.00019

Q16

Thames Valley Strategic HA

0.00020

0.00020

0.00020

0.00018

0.00017

0.00017

0.00017

0.00016

0.00017

Q17

Hampshire And Isle Of Wight Strategic HA

0.00019

0.00020

0.00020

0.00020

0.00019

0.00018

0.00017

0.00018

0.00015

Q18

Kent and Medway Strategic HA

0.00021

0.00019

0.00019

0.00019

0.00018

0.00016

0.00016

0.00014

0.00015

Q19

Surrey and Sussex Strategic HA

0.00019

0.00019

0.00018

0.00017

0.00016

0.00016

0.00015

0.00015

0.00014

Q20

Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire SHA

0.00023

0.00021

0.00022

0.00022

0.00021

0.00021

0.00020

0.00020

0.00020

Q21

South West Peninsula Strategic HA

0.00023

0.00023

0.00023

0.00021

0.00018

0.00018

0.00018

0.00017

0.00015

Q22

Dorset and Somerset Strategic HA

0.00018

0.00016

0.00015

0.00015

0.00014

0.00014

0.00014

0.00014

0.00014

Q23

South Yorkshire Strategic HA

0.00015

0.00017

0.00017

0.00015

0.00020

0.00019

0.00021

0.00021

0.00021

Q24

Trent Strategic HA

0.00020

0.00018

0.00018

0.00018

0.00017

0.00017

0.00017

0.00017

0.00017

Q25

Leics, Northants and Rutland SHA

0.00020

0.00019

0.00019

0.00018

0.00018

0.00017

0.00017

0.00017

0.00013

Q26

Shropshire and Staffordshire SHA

0.00018

0.00018

0.00018

0.00017

0.00017

0.00017

0.00019

0.00018

0.00016

Q27

Birmingham and the Black Country SHA

0.00022

0.00021

0.00022

0.00020

0.00021

0.00020

0.00021

0.00019

0.00019

Q28

West Midlands South Strategic HA

0.00021

0.00020

0.00019

0.00020

0.00021

0.00019

0.00019

0.00018

0.00017

England

0.00022

0.00021

0.00021

0.00020

0.00020

0.00019

0.00019

0.00018

0.00018

Notes:

1. KH03 is a provider based collection so the data are not available at PCT level.

2. The data have been mapped to the 28 SHAs created 1 April 2002 to provide a timeseries comparison.

3. Population data are mid-year population estimates based on the 2001-1991 census

4. Beds totals include beds in wards open overnight, day only beds and residential care beds.

Source:

Department of Health form KH03 and ONS for population statistics.

Hospital Beds: Heart Diseases

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average number of occupied bed days was for patients admitted to hospitals with congestive heart failure in each of the last five years. (152918)

The information is in the following table and footnotes.

Mean and median bed days during the year for finished admissions episodes with a primary diagnosis of 150.0 Congestive Heart Failure for 2001-02 to 2005-06—NHS hospitals, England

Mean

Median

2005-06

7

3

2004-05

7

3

2003-04

8

3

2002-03

9

4

2001-02

10

5

Notes:

1. ICD-10 Code: I50.0 Congestive Heart Failure

2. Bed Days During the Year

Bed days within the year include only those days falling between 1 April and 31 March of the data year including unfinished episodes, unless otherwise stated.

3. Diagnosis (Primary Diagnosis)

The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 14 (seven prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data set and provides the main reason why the patient was in hospital.

4. Data Quality

HES are compiled from data sent by over 300 national health service trusts and primary care trusts (PCTs) in England. The Information Centre for health and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data via HES processes. While this brings about improvement over time, some shortcomings remain.

5. Assessing growth through time

HES figures are available from 1989-90 onwards. During the years that these records have been collected the NHS there have been ongoing improvements in quality and coverage. These improvements in information submitted by the NHS have been particularly marked in the earlier years and need to be borne in mind when analysing time series.

Changes in NHS practice also need to be borne in mind when analysing time series. For example a number of procedures may now be undertaken in outpatient settings and may no longer be accounted in the HES data. This may account for any reductions in activity over time.

6.Ungrossed Data

Figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data (ie the data are ungrossed).

Source:

HES, The Information Centre for health and social care

Hospitals: Doctors

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many hospital trusts are not in compliance with the Royal College of Physicians’ guidelines on consultants working at more than one hospital. (150576)

Hospitals: Food

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many and what percentage of hospital main meals were left untouched in (a) England and (b) each NHS provider organisation in each year from 2001-02 to 2006-07; and if he will make a statement. (153406)

Information on the number, and percentage, of hospital main meals left untouched in England is in the following table. Information relating to individual national health service providers has been placed in the Library. Data were not collected before 2001-02.

England

Total number untouched/unserved patient meals

Average percentage untouched/unserved patient meals

2001-02

11,473,923

8.86

2002-03

14,582,371

10.44

2003-04

16,708,212

10.71

2004-05

10,707,712

10.26

2005-06

13,053,065

9.42

Food is left untouched or unserved for a variety of reasons, but generally a combination of sufficient food being provided in order to ensure patients have a choice and changing requirements, i.e. patients being discharged or moved, being absent for treatment or changing clinical status after the food orders have been made.

Since 2004-05, the data provided have not been collected on a mandatory basis and therefore will not be complete.

Hospitals: Infectious Diseases

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many babies have contracted hospital- acquired infections in the last 12 months, broken down by health trust. (152763)

The best available data are given as follows but will include both community and healthcare-acquired infections.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

Information on age has only been collected under the mandatory surveillance scheme by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) since October 2005 and the latest data were published on 25 July 2007. The total number of cases of MRSA bloodstream infections in the 12 months from April 2006 to March 2007 in children aged under one year in England was 35.

The small numbers involved mean that the information is not available by named trust as this could result in deductive disclosure.

Clostridium difficile

Children under two years are not included in the mandatory surveillance scheme.

The HPA’s voluntary reporting scheme collects data on age and sex of cases. The scheme does not collect data on where infection was acquired (e.g. neonatal unit, or maternity unit). The following table shows the number of cases of Clostridium difficile for children from birth to one in England, Wales and Northern Ireland for 2005. Data for 2006 are not available yet.

Age

2005

Under 1 month

37

1 to 5 months

42

6 to 11 months

40

The aforementioned information is likely to be an underestimate as not all laboratories report. Furthermore, testing of children under two years of age may be limited owing to a general belief that the presence of C. difficile is not usually clinically significant in this age group as asymptomatic carriage, including production of toxins A and B, is common in this age group.

No other data on healthcare associated infections are available by age group.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 18 July 2007, Official Report, column 456W, on hospitals: infectious diseases, in how many hospitals the six deaths in 2005 took place. (153633)

The six deaths from methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in persons aged under one, in 2005, occurred in five different hospitals.

Hospitals: Private Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how many hospitals were opened with private finance initiative funding since 1997, broken down by strategic health authority region; (151458)

(2) what the value of private finance initiative projects for which his Department is responsible was in each of the last five years, broken down by strategic health authority region;

(3) how many of the hospitals which have been opened through private finance initiative funding since 1997 have subsequently been closed, broken down by strategic health authority region.

The information for PFI schemes with capital value over £10 million is shown in the following table.

£ million

Capital value of PFI schemes opened or commenced construction in each of last five years

Strategic health authority

PFI schemes operational since 1997

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007(to date)

Total

East Midlands

1

312

19

354

0

29

714

East of England

4

15

0

0

66

412

493

London

19

224

0

443

1,541

33

2,241

North East

9

205

16

299

32

24

576

North West

4

0

512

0

478

0

990

South Central

7

30

19

365

47

207

668

South East Coast

4

29

0

0

0

36

65

South West

6

0

42

0

107

21

170

West Midlands

8

13

0

163

1,006

306

1,488

Yorkshire and the Humber

7

22

279

42

62

378

783

Totals

69

850

887

1,666

3,339

1,446

8,188

There are no instances of a PFI facility built since 1997 for the national health service that has subsequently closed.

Human Papilloma Virus: Vaccination

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will take steps to ensure that clear guidance is given to primary care trusts on how girls can access human papilloma virus vaccines outside (a) vaccination and (b) catch-up programmes. (153447)

I refer the hon. member to the reply I gave to the hon. Member for Portsmouth, South (Mr. Hancock) on 19 July 2007, Official Report, columns 633-34W.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation expects to provide a recommendation to Ministers on a potential human papilloma virus vaccination catch-up programme for girls beyond the age of 13, following its meeting in October 2007. (153448)

A detailed analysis is being carried out by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) regarding the benefits and costs of introducing a human papilloma virus vaccine programme. This work is being externally peer reviewed to ensure its robustness. This review has not yet been completed and therefore JCVI will not be able to make its more detailed recommendation, including whether there will be a catch-up for older girls, until after its next meeting, on October 17.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which body will be completing the independent peer review of the cost benefit analysis for human papilloma virus vaccination; and when this review is due to be completed. (153476)

A detailed analysis is being carried out by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) regarding the benefits and costs of introducing a human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine programme. This work is being externally peer reviewed by biologists working in the HPV field, mathematical modellers and economists in order to ensure its robustness.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how he will involve primary care trusts and strategic health authorities in planning for implementation of a human papilloma virus vaccination programme in autumn 2008. (153477)

The introduction of a comprehensive nationwide human papilloma virus vaccine programme will be a considerable undertaking for the national health service and many practical issues need to be discussed with stakeholders, particularly from the NHS. The Department will work with stakeholders, including primary care trusts and strategic health authorities, to plan for the introduction of the vaccine.

Influenza

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 12 March 2007, Official Report, column 130W, on influenza, whether he has considered the practicalities of giving short courses of antivirals as prophylaxis to members of the household of a person infected with pandemic influenza; what estimate he has made of the size of the antiviral stockpile necessary to do so; whether he plans to consider the possibility of using antivirals as prophylaxis in (a) schools, (b) healthcare settings and (c) other institutions; when he expects to take a final decision regarding stockpiling additional antivirals for prophylactic purposes; and if he will make a statement. (152310)

Prophylaxis is being considered as part of the overall countermeasures strategy for pandemic influenza. No decisions have been made on the use of prophylaxis but the policy is being kept under review including the possible size of any stockpiles and the potential options for their use.

Influenza: Disease Control

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what guidance he has issued to (a) businesses and (b) other organisations outside the health and social care sectors on the safe use of (i) pharmacological and (ii) other clinical interventions to mitigate the impact of a potential influenza pandemic. (152169)

Advice to businesses and organisations that are planning to make interventions available to their employees is that distribution should be carried out under the guidance of a medical practitioner, in line with their usual occupational health arrangements. Advice on planning for a pandemic is included in the draft national framework for responding to an influenza pandemic that was issued for public discussion in March. Workplace guidance for pandemic flu is also available from the Health and Safety Executive website.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list the main headings of the information presented to the 14 February 2007 meeting of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation on risk groups relating to the prioritisation of vaccinations in the event of an influenza pandemic; what progress is being made in combining this information with mathematical modelling in order to present a comprehensive package of information; by which (a) parties and (b) Government Departments this comprehensive package of information will be used; and if he will make a statement. (152172)

The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) considered prioritisation issues connected with pandemic-specific vaccines and pre-pandemic vaccines which might be deployed to counter a flu pandemic. The group was presented with clinical, practical and public health considerations for the possible prioritisation of some or all of the following groups; healthcare workers, those at high risk of complications, those aged 18 years or younger to reduce disease transmission, those over 65, essential workers and enclosed communities. Another consideration was vaccination of the entire population.

The modelling subgroup of the Pandemic Influenza Scientific Advisory Group has considered the conclusions of a number of pieces of analysis (some commissioned specially for the group) on the role of both pre- and specific vaccines. This is discussed in the modelling summary published on the Department’s website. The results of the analysis and the conclusions of the subgroup were presented at the June JCVI meeting and there will be further presentations and discussion at the next meeting.

The conclusions of the discussion will feed into the considerations of the Department and the Cabinet Office, including discussions with other Government Departments, on future options for pandemic preparedness.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what representations he has received on the effectiveness of stockpiling (a) oseltamivir, (b) zanamivir, (c) other antivirals and (d) pre-pandemic vaccines to prepare the NHS for tackling an influenza pandemic. (152173)

We continue to receive representations from a range of sources on the effectiveness of stockpiling both antivirals and pre-pandemic vaccine.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) when his Department will publish its response to the consultation on the national framework for responding to an influenza pandemic; (152175)

(2) pursuant to the answer of 9 March 2007, Official Report, column 2298W, on influenza, when he plans to publish a final framework.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment his Department has made of the (a) manufacturing capacity, (b) distribution capacity and (c) storage capacity of the pre-pandemic vaccine producers. (152176)

The United Kingdom policy on pre-pandemic vaccination has not yet been finalised and the appropriateness and cost-effectiveness of this countermeasure is still being assessed, along with manufacturing, distribution and storage capacity of producers.

Injuries: Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many children (a) were admitted to hospital and (b) died as a result of unintentional injury in each of the last five years. (152762)

The number of admissions of children (aged 0 to 14) to hospital as a result of unintentional injury in each of the last five years for which data are available is shown in the following table.

Count of finished admission episodes for children (ages 0-14) with unintentional injury, national health service hospitals, England

Financial year

Number of admissions

2001-02

102,833

2002-03

97,493

2003-04

99,915

2004-05

99,517

2005-06

100,194

Notes:

1. A finished admission episode is the first period of in-patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. Admissions do not represent the number of in-patients, as a person may have more than one admission within the year.

2. Data are for International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes V01 to X59, which cover external causes of accidental injury. Data represent a count of all episodes where this diagnosis was mentioned in any of the 14 (seven prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in a HES record.

3. HES are compiled from data sent by over 300 NHS trusts and primary care trusts in England. The Information Centre for health and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data via HES processes. While this brings about improvement over time, some shortcomings remain.

4. When analysing time series of HES data, the impact of improvements over time in data quality and coverage, and of changes in NHS practice need to be borne in mind. For example, a number of procedures may now be undertaken in outpatient settings and may no longer be accounted in the HES data. This may account for any reductions in activity over time.

5. Figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data (ie the data are ungrossed).

Source:

Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), The Information Centre for health and social care.

The number of children (aged 0 to 14) who died as a result of unintentional injury in each of the last five years for which data are available is shown in the following table.

Deaths from unintentional injury, ages 0 to 14, England

Number of deaths

2002

284

2003

274

2004

240

2005

231

2006

233

Notes:

1. Data are for deaths registered in each calendar year.

2. Cause of death is based on the final underlying cause, defined using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes V01 to X59.

3. Data are for usual residents of England.

Source:

Office for National Statistics death registrations

Junior Doctors: Vacancies

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many and what proportion of vacancies for junior doctors are expected to be filled by 1 August, broken down by (a) deanery and (b) specialty; and if he will make a statement. (153419)

At the end of round one, 85 per cent. of junior doctor training posts had been filled.

The round 2 recruitment is in progress and the estimated total fill rate for 1 August is around 90 per cent. This means that national health service hospitals should have the junior doctors they need in post to ensure that services run smoothly around the annual changeover of junior doctors in early August.

A new wave of junior doctors start working in NHS hospitals across the country in August, each year. We appreciate that there are more involved this year, but hospitals are used to dealing with a new influx of junior doctors. Hospital consultants every year quietly, and very competently, plan for that process.

All applicants who are in substantive NHS employment will continue to have employment while they progress through the next round. This will help cover any remaining gaps in August.

Link Up Service

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what discussions he has had with colleagues in the Department for Work and Pensions on the health benefits of the Link Up service. (152049)

The cross-Government strategy, “‘Opportunity Age’—meeting the challenge of a changing society”, was published by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) as a consultation document on 23 March 2005. The strategy outlines what can be done to meet the challenge of the changing demographics in the 21st century and looks specifically at the issues facing society as people live longer, healthier lives. It includes supporting active ageing and giving people more choice and independence in how they use the services at their disposal.

The Department was a major partner with the DWP in Opportunity Age. A specific theme of Opportunity Age was the development of LinkAge Plus pilots, which aim to build more effective links between central Government, local authorities and other organisations and deliver a fully integrated service to meet the needs of older people.

Eight LinkAge Plus pilots were established. LinkAge Plus is a two-year pilot programme, with funding available until March 2008. It was launched in September 2006 and aims to test models of partnership working and build up evidence of good practice to ensure joined up working. The Link Up service in Gateshead is one of these pilots.

Link Up offers advice and help to people in Gateshead aged 50 or over on a variety of topics, including health, benefits and how to stay healthy and active, and help with domestic tasks such as gardening and shopping.

Macular Degeneration

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will instruct primary care trusts to make all treatments for wet age-related macular degeneration available to patients on the national health service. (151949)

All primary care trusts (PCTs) are funding photodynamic therapy treatment for patients with both the wholly classic and the predominantly classic forms of wet age-related macular degeneration, in line with guidance from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).

NICE is currently carrying out an appraisal of Lucentis and Macugen, which are now both licensed for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration, and final guidance is due later in the year.

Where guidance from NICE is not yet available, PCTs are expected to apply local arrangements for the managed introduction of new technologies. These arrangements should include an assessment of the available evidence.

Medical Treatments Abroad

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many NHS patients were treated overseas in 2006, broken down by (a) country in which treatment was obtained and (b) type of treatment; and what the cost was to the NHS of these treatments, broken down by country in which treatment was obtained. (151702)

[holding answer 23 July 2007]: It has been assumed that the question relates to patients being referred abroad specifically for treatment. There are a number of different routes by which patients can be sent abroad for treatment. We only hold information where the relevant authorisation has to be given by the Department. Cost information is not available as claims do not separate the different categories of treatment and this could only be done at disproportionate cost. The following table shows the number of patients treated by country and treatment type where Departmental authorisation has been given.

Country

Type of Treatment

Number of cases

Austria

Lung transplant

1

Maternity care

5

Removal of screws

1

Total for country

7

Belgium

Annual check for heart transplant

1

Atrial fibrillation

1

CTscan

2

Maternity care

21

Phalloplasty

2

Scan for epilepsy (ictal spect scan)

3

Total for country

30

Czech Republic

Maternity care

11

Total for country

11

Finland

Blood test

1

Cancer care

2

Cholecystectomy

1

Maternity care

4

Removal of implant

1

Total for country

9

France

Bladder echocardiogram

1

Brain aneurysm treatment

1

Colonoscopy

2

Consultation

3

Ear reconstruction

2

EEG scan

1

Embolisation

1

Endoscopy

1

Gamma knife assessment

1

Maternity care

104

Photons

1

Pilondial sinus and abscess

1

Primary torsion dystonia

1

Proton beam therapy

3

Pudendal nerve compression

2

Renal transplant

1

Stereo-Electroencephalography

2

Steroid injection

1

Thyroidectomy

1

Trapped pudendal nerve

1

Urine test/injection

1

Unknown

4

Total for country

136

Germany

Advanced radiosurgery/MRI scan

1

Cancer treatment

1

Chemotherapy

1

Cyberknife therapy

1

F-Dopa-Pet scan

1

Speech therapy

1

Heart stemcell therapy

1

Hernia

1

Intraluminal bare laser

2

Laser treatment of the tongue

2

Maternity care

44

Meg scan

1

Pet scan

1

Phalloplasty

1

Provision of hearing aid

1

Skin cancer

1

Stem cell therapy

1

Unknown

1

Total for country

63

Greece

Maternity care

2

Total for country

2

Italy

Maternity care

10

Total for country

10

Netherlands

Chemotherapy

2

Genetic mutation analysis

1

Maternity care

8

Total for country

11

Norway

Maternity care

1

Total for country

1

Poland

Accident

1

Maternity care

21

Total for country

22

Slovak Republic

Maternity care

3

Total for country

3

Spain

Maternity care

27

Medication

1

Total for country

28

Sweden

Carcinoid cancer

3

Ergonomics and physiotherapy

3

Lymph oedema

1

Maternity care

3

Neurendocrine pancreatic tumour

2

Octreotide treatment

2

Unknown

3

Total for country

17

Switzerland

Maternity care

5

Total for country

5

Unknown

Unknown

2

Total treatments abroad

357

Medical Treatments: Heart Diseases

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what percentage of patients suffering from congestive heart failure were treated through (a) pharmacological management, (b) cardiac transplant surgery and (c) the use of medical devices in each of the last five years, broken down by strategic health authority. (152914)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much the NHS spent on (a) pharmacological management, (b) cardiac transplant surgery and (c) the use of medical devices in the treatment of congestive heart failure in each of the last five years, broken down by strategic health authority. (152915)

Information is not collected in the form requested. It is possible to separate spending on medical devices and pharmacological management devices specifically for treatment for congestive heart failure from figures for such spending related to cardiac conditions generally.

On heart and lung transplants only national figures are available for procedures commissioned under the auspices of the National Specialist Commissioning Advisory Group. The following figures are for national commissioning across England, Scotland and Northern Ireland and include assessment, organ retrieval and follow-up services for both heart and lung transplant.

£ million

2002-03

30.1

2003-04

31.4

2004-05

33.8

2005-06

35.7

2006-07

37.8

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what the cost was of treating congestive heart failure in each of the last five years to the NHS, broken down by strategic health authority; (152916)

(2) what the average cost of an occupied bed day was for patients with congestive heart failure in each of the last five years, broken down by strategic health authority.

Members: Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when he will reply to the letter from the hon. Member for West Worcestershire of 21 June 2007 on Type 1 diabetes. (153492)

Mental Health Services: Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many specialists in child mental health were employed in the NHS in each of the last 10 years, broken down by NHS trust. (151017)

Information about medical child mental health specialists has been placed in the Library. It is not possible to separately identify child mental health nurses.

Mental Health Services: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) consultant psychiatrists, (b) mental health nurses and (c) primary care mental health workers were employed by the NHS in each of the last 10 years, broken down by (i) head count and (ii) full-time equivalents. (151009)

The information requested is shown in the following tables.

1997199819992000

Headcount

Full-time equivalent

Headcount

Full-time equivalent

Headcount

Full-time equivalent

Headcount

Full-time equivalent

All staff

52,667

47,385

51,504

46,316

51,730

46,273

51,930

46,823

Consultant Psychiatrists

2,447

2,206

2,627

2,359

2,808

2,525

2,904

2,621

Mental Health Nurses

50,220

45,179

48,877

43,957

48,922

43,748

49,026

44,203

Nurse Consultant

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Modern Matron

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Manager

1,137

1,106

1,119

1,085

1,070

1,036

1,154

1,113

Other 1st level

43,509

39,297

42,963

38,685

43,494

38,965

44,363

40,061

Other 2nd level

5,574

4,776

4,795

4,186

4,358

3,747

3,509

3,029

2001200220032004

Headcount

Full-time equivalent

Headcount

Full-time equivalent

Headcount

Full-time equivalent

Headcount

Full-time equivalent

All staff

54,274

48,046

55,183

49,172

56,907

50,127

59,601

52,342

Consultant Psychiatrists

2,959

2,633

2,979

2,673

3,229

2,920

3,555

3,231

Mental Health Nurses

51,315

45,413

52,204

46,499

53,678

47,207

56,046

49,111

Nurse Consultant

36

36

75

70

95

94

130

126

Modern Matron

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Manager

1,464

1,416

1,423

1,377

1,731

1,677

2,021

1,974

Other 1st level

46,112

40,927

47,673

42,590

48,775

43,120

50,924

44,785

Other 2nd level

3,703

3,033

3,033

2,461

3,077

2,317

2,971

2,226

20052006

Headcount

Full-time equivalent

Headcount

Full-time equivalent

All staff

61,136

53,328

59,866

52,957

Consultant Psychiatrists

3,759

3,432

3,805

3,474

Mental Health Nurses

57,377

49,896

56,061

49,483

Nurse Consultant

142

138

144

141

Modern Matron

168

165

225

222

Manager

1,764

1,718

1,823

1,763

Other 1st level

52,668

45,965

52,299

46,009

Other 2nd level

2,635

1,909

1,570

1,348

n/a = Not applicable.

Notes:

1. Mental health nurses are those qualified nurses who work within the community psychiatry, other psychiatry, community learning disabilities and other learning disabilities areas.

2. More accurate validation processes in 2006 have resulted in the identification and removal of 9,858 duplicate non-medical staff records out of the total work force figure of 1.3 million in 2006. Earlier years’ figures could not be accurately validated in this way and so will be slightly inflated. The level of inflation in earlier years’ figures is estimated to be less than 1 per cent. of total across all non-medical staff groups for headcount figures (and negligible for full-time equivalents). This should be taken into consideration when analysing trends over time.

Sources:

1. Information Centre for health and social care non-medical workforce census

2. The Information Centre for health and social care medical and dental workforce census

Mental Health Services: Young People

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many new cases were dealt with by child and adolescent mental health services in each of the last five years. (150656)

The number of new cases dealt with by specialist child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in England was as follows.

Cases

2002

9,822

2003

16,632

2004

27,892

2005

31,330

2006

29,170

Source:

CAMHS mapping data 2002-06

Midwives: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what recent assessment he has made of the adequacy of the number of midwives working in the NHS in England. (151616)

It is important that these assessments are made locally as they know their local needs best and can ensure that services are developed to meet these needs.

The 2007-08 national health service operating framework requires local NHS organisations to undertake a review of their maternity services, identify the gaps and barriers to service development and set out their local strategy for delivery of maternity matters. The review needs to include an assessment of their workforce capacity.

Between September 1997 and September 2006, the (headcount) number of midwives employed in the NHS has increased by 2,084 (9 per cent).

Midwives: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many training places for student midwives are planned to be provided in (a) the 2007-08 academic year and (b) subsequent years; what factors are taken into account in deciding the number commissioned; which (i) individuals and (ii) organisations were consulted in that decision; and who decides how many places will be commissioned. (151613)

A total of 2,116 planned student midwifery training places were commissioned for the 2007-08 academic year. Information on the number of planned training places for subsequent years is not available centrally.

When determining the number of training places needed, the existing number of midwifes, the expected number of graduates and policy priorities such as Maternity Matters are expected to be taken into account.

Strategic health authorities will have the final decision on how many places to commission. The Department has a service level agreement with local strategic health authorities (SHAs) which expects them to make decisions and plans based on long-term workforce planning using national and local data sources with support from the national workforce review team. It is for individual SHAs to decide on the appropriate organisations to consult.

Multiple Sclerosis: Drugs

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when the review on the use of the drug Sativex by multiple sclerosis patients will conclude; and if he will make a statement. (153485)

The review period for Sativex concluded on 19 July 2007 when the applicant for the marketing authorisation, GW Pharmaceuticals Ltd, withdrew the application in all concerned member states (Netherland, Denmark, Spain and the United Kingdom). No further review on Sativex is possible until another application is submitted by the company.

Musculoskeletal Disorders: Health Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how he will assess implementation of the Musculoskeletal Services Framework beyond the 18-week target. (152980)

The Musculoskeletal Services Framework (MSF) was published as good practice guidance and it is for local organisations to decide how best to implement it. The Department will not be monitoring local implementation formally, but will continue to monitor indicators such as waiting times and to liaise with stakeholders such as those represented on the National Orthopaedics Co-ordinating Group.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many submissions his Department has received on addressing musculoskeletal problems in the Quality and Outcomes Framework. (152981)

The Department of Health does not receive any submissions on changes to the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF).

The independent expert panel which advises the negotiating parties to the general medical services contract on the evidence for changes to the QOF invited submissions for a review of QOF in 2005. The panel received two submissions in relation to falls, one in relation to osteoarthritis and seven in relation to osteoporosis. All submissions were considered and the expert panel produced reports which have been published on the University of Birmingham website.

As part of the ongoing development of the framework, indicators will be subject to continuing review in the light of emerging evidence, in the context of a value for money agreement. The expert panel again invited patient groups and professional bodies to submit evidence on current or potential future areas in QOF by 28 February this year. The panel has now concluded oral sessions with submitting groups. NHS Employers, which holds the contract with the expert panel and negotiates changes to the contract with the British Medical Association, intends to make further information available on this process soon.

NHS Direct

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many calls were made to NHS Direct in each of the last five years; and what progress is being made on the development and implementation of the telephone internet and digital service as recommended in the White Paper, “Choosing Health”. (152239)

The NHS Direct Trust has provided the following information.

Number of calls offered1 to NHS Direct in the last five calendar years

Calls offered

2002

7,375,970

2003

8,168,357

2004

8,611,418

2005

8,104,166

2006

7,336,604

1 Defined as the number of calls offered received by NHS Direct. This is the combined total of calls to NHS Direct’s out-of-hours services and calls to the 08454647 telephone line.

Sources:

1. NHS Direct. The figures have not been validated by the Department

2. NHS Direct NHS Trust National Operations Centre

The “Choosing Health” White Paper commitment to develop and implement telephone, internet and digital services is being delivered through the new NHS Choices website, available at www.nhs.uk/Pages/homepage.aspx. This currently incorporates a Live Well area; a local services search facility; and personalised, national health service accredited content that reflects the interests and needs of different age groups across a spectrum of issues and factors which can impact upon length and quality of life. Further services, including testing of SMS text messaging and digital television, will be added later this year.

NHS Treatment Centres

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the cost of operating walk-in centres was in each primary care trust in the latest year for which figures are available. (152269)

The Department does not collect this information centrally. Primary Care Trusts are responsible for commissioning NHS walk-in centres.

NHS Treatment Centres: York

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients were treated at York NHS walk-in centre in each year since it opened. (151639)

The information requested is contained in the following table.

Attendances at NHS Walk in Centre (WiC), North Yorkshire and York Primary Care Trust (PCT), 2003-04 to 2006-07

Organisation

Attendances

2003-04

Selby and York PCT

39,221

2004-05

Selby and York PCT

36,194

2005-06

Selby and York PCT

28,058

2006-07

North Yorkshire and York PCT

24,338

Notes: 1. Attendances at WiCs were not collected as part of the QMAE return prior to 2003-04. Throughout this period the organisations above only reported one WiC each quarter. 2. On 1 October 2006, Selby and York PCT merged with three other PCTs to form North Yorkshire and York PCT. Source: Department of Health dataset QMAE.

NHS: Accountancy

To ask the Secretary of State for Health on which dates the annual accounts of the NHS were published in each of the last five years. (151515)

All national health service bodies are required to publish their accounts locally. The accounts must be presented at a public meeting held no later than 30 September following the end of the financial year (31 March).

The National Audit Office publishes the NHS summarised accounts for strategic health authorities, primary care trusts and NHS trusts. The publication dates for the last five financial years were:

2001-02: 21 March 2003

2002-03: 28 April 2004

2003-04: 24 June 2005

2004-05: 7 June 2006

2005-06: not yet published

NHS: Drugs

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether his Department put in place formal arrangements with the Department of Trade and Industry to ensure co-operation when representing the interests of the pharmaceutical industry, as stated on page 24 of the Government's response to the Health Committee's report “The Influence of the Pharmaceutical Industry”, Cm 6655; whether this formal co-operation now takes place between his Department and the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform; whether this formal co-operation extends to representing the interests of the (a) nutraceutical, (b) food supplements and (c) specialist nutritional products industries; and if he will make a statement. (153398)

In line with the Government response to the Health Committee’s report “The Influence of the Pharmaceutical Industry”, the Department and the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) have put in place formal arrangements to ensure close working between both Departments on issues relating to the pharmaceutical industry.

The directors of the Medicines, Pharmacy and Industry Group (MPIG) in the Department and the Business Relations Group at BERR meet regularly and work closely in taking forward this agenda. In addition, officials in the Industry Branch within MPIG and in the BioScience Unit of the Business Relations Unit meet on a quarterly basis. They also work closely on a day-to-day basis taking forward policy relating to the United Kingdom-based pharmaceutical industry. These formal relations were put in place in 2005 and continue today.

The Department sponsors the pharmaceutical and medical devices industries. It does not sponsor the nutraceutical, food supplements and specialist nutritional products industries, and similar relations with BERR are not required.

NHS: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the per capita funding allocated to each primary care trust in England was in each of the last five years for which figures are available; and what the national average NHS per capita funding was in each such year. (142734)

A table showing the funds per capita for each primary care trust in England and the England average for the years 2003-04 to 2007-08 has been placed in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether his Department’s 2002 Spending Review settlement set financial limits on the negotiation of a new contract for the delivery of general medical services. (151425)

The cost of the new contract for the delivery of general medical services was just one of the many components that made up the Department’s 2002 Spending Review settlement.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 11 July 2007, Official Report, column 1487W, on NHS: finance, if he will place in the Library copies of the guidance on the introduction of Resource Accounting and Budgeting issued to the NHS by his Department in 2000 and the consolidated guidance issued in February 2001. (153486)

Copies of “A guide to resource accounting and budgeting for the NHS”, issued by the Department’s Finance Directorate, have been placed in the Library. It can also be found on the Department’s website at:

www.dh.gov.uk/en/Policyandguidance/Organisationpolicy/Financeandplanning/Allocations/DH_4000346

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 12 July 2007, Official Report, column 1670W, on NHS: finance, what the dates were of each meeting for which his Department holds minutes on this subject. (153487)

The Department's Ministers and officials regularly discuss a wide range of issues with their counterparts in HM Treasury. As was the case in previous Administrations, it is not the practice of the Government to provide details of all such meetings.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 12 July 2007, Official Report, column 1670W, on NHS: finance, what form these records take other than minutes of meetings. (153488)

NHS: Greater London

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many London hospitals that have completed or committed to private finance initiative (PFI) contracts may be affected by the Darzi proposals to reorganise NHS services in London; and what estimate he has made of the potential level of PFI debt that may fall back on to the (a) Exchequer and (b) NHS in the event of closure. (152400)

Changes in services are a matter for the local national health service. Specific proposals as a result of the Darzi review have not yet emerged.

Under a private finance initiative contract, trusts may terminate the contract with notice at any time, without having to prove right and regardless of any prejudice to the private sector. In these circumstances, compensation would be payable to the contractor on a trust default basis aiming to put the contractor in a position that is ‘no better, no worse’ than it would have been had the contract run for its full length. A value for money case for exercising this option must be made. To date no estimates have been made by the Department on the termination liabilities of any PFI scheme, costs which would be met by the individual trust involved.

NHS: ICT

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what (a) bonuses and (b) pension benefits the outgoing chief executive of Connecting for Health will accrue before leaving Connecting for Health; what severance pay he will be eligible for; and when he will have completed his notice period at the agency. (151939)

The outgoing director general of Connecting for Health will be stepping down from his role in the Department and he will not be eligible for severance pay. A final day of service has not been agreed between the Department and the director general and dependent upon his last day of service this will determine eligibility for bonus payments. The director general for Connecting for Health will continue to accrue pension benefits under the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme in the usual way until his final day of service.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) whether the new Chief Executive of Connecting for Health will be empowered to renegotiate contracts with local service providers; (151940)

(2) whether responsibility for delivering Connecting for Health will lie with (a) Ministers and (b) the new Chief Executive of Connecting for Health.

The Chief Executive of NHS Connecting for Health is accountable, through the national health service Chief Executive, to Ministers for the strategic direction of the national programme for information technology and for management of the contracts between the Department and local service providers. The programme contracts provide appropriate mechanisms for negotiating contract changes where that is necessary.

Responsibility for local implementation, and realising the benefits of the technology, rests with the strategic health authority (SHA) chief executives as senior responsible owners for the programme within the NHS. In this way SHAs, together with NHS trusts and primary care trusts, are able to participate in the choice of systems and services, and in the planning and timing of deployments to better match the programme to local NHS priorities.

There are no current plans to alter these arrangements.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether the tenure of the outgoing Chief Executive of Connecting for Health will overlap with that of his successor. (151941)

A final day of service has not yet been agreed between the Department and the Director General and it is unknown whether there will be an overlap with any successor at this stage.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what team was put on standby to take over iSoft in the case of Connecting for Health exercising its step-in-rights; and at what cost the team was put on standby. (153296)

Step-in rights are one of a number of provisions in the contracts between NHS Connecting for Health and its prime contractors under the national programme for information technology whose exercise is reserved, on an exceptional basis and in the event of certain critical circumstances, for the purpose of maintaining continuity of delivery and service for the NHS.

Action was taken to exercise this provision in relation to iSoft on a contingency basis, and a joint team of appropriately experienced NHS and private sector programme managers and software engineers identified for the purpose. There have been no standby costs, but some limited expenditure has been incurred in monitoring the circumstances surrounding the recent uncertainty over the future of iSoft. However, this has not been recorded separately and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

NHS: Information

To ask the Secretary of State for Health in which areas he expects trials of the information prescription to take place; how many people will be involved in the trials; what funding has been allocated for the trials; and if he will make a statement. (152224)

Information prescription pilots are taking place in 20 areas around England in a range of health and social care settings, and they include many different health and social need conditions and needs. A full list has been placed in the Library.

Each pilot site is involving a range of service users, professionals, carers and support staff, but there are no counts of the numbers of people involved, and more people will continue to be involved as the pilots progress. The initiative in total has a funding of £1.35 million in 2006-07, and £2.5 million in 2007-08.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health for which conditions he expects information prescriptions to be available. (152225)

Information prescriptions are being developed for everyone with a long-term condition or social care need, as described in the 2006 White Paper ‘Our Health, Our Care, Our Say’.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when he expects to make an assessment of the information prescription trial. (152226)

The 20 information prescriptions pilot sites are being assessed by an independent evaluation consortium. They will be producing a final report on the work of the pilots in February 2008, which will be used to inform the national roll-out of information prescriptions.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans he is making for the full roll-out of information prescriptions; and how much he expects the full roll-out of information prescription to cost. (152227)

The information prescriptions initiative has a funding of £2.5 million in the financial year 2007-08. Plans for full roll-out will be developed based on the learning from the 20 sites which are piloting information prescriptions.

NHS: Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much was spent (a) in the NHS, (b) in each primary care trust area and (c) by each primary care trust on payoffs to staff in each of the last three years. (152268)

NHS: Sick Leave

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 14 June 2007, Official Report, column 1320W, on NHS: sick leave, what the average sickness absence rate for NHS staff was in each year since 2001, broken down by strategic health authority area. (147497)

The national health service sickness absence rate has fallen from 4.8 per cent. in 2001 to 4.5 per cent. in 2005.

The following table shows sickness absence rates from 2001 to 2005. This is broken down by strategic health authority (SHAs) for 2003 to 20051. The Information Centre for health and social care advises that the quality of data is not high enough prior to 2003 to break this information down by SHA. Sickness absence rates for 2006 are not included because a refresh exercise is being undertaken. Final 2006 figures will be available in August.

1 For previous structure of 28 SHAs. It is not possible to reproduce this for the current structure of 10 SHAs.

Percentage

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

England

4.8

4.6

4.7

4.6

4.5

Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire

n/a

n/a

4.5

4.6

4.6

Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire

n/a

n/a

4.6

4.4

4.2

Essex

n/a

n/a

4.7

4.6

4.4

North West London

n/a

n/a

4.0

4.1

4.0

North Central London

n/a

n/a

4.1

4.0

3.8

North East London

n/a

n/a

4.1

4.4

4.1

South East London

n/a

n/a

4.7

4.2

3.9

South West London

n/a

n/a

4.2

4.1

4.3

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear

n/a

n/a

5.4

5.2

5.7

County Durham and Tees Valley

n/a

n/a

4.8

4.8

4.6

North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire

n/a

n/a

4.4

4.3

4.4

West Yorkshire

n/a

n/a

4.8

4.4

4.5

Cumbria and Lancashire

n/a

n/a

4.8

4.8

5.0

Greater Manchester

n/a

n/a

5.2

4.8

5.0

Cheshire and Merseyside

n/a

n/a

5.4

5.3

5.4

Thames Valley

n/a

n/a

3.9

4.0

3.9

Hampshire and Isle of Wight

n/a

n/a

4.4

4.3

4.2

Kent and Medway

n/a

n/a

4.8

4.9

4.5

Surrey and Sussex

n/a

n/a

4.0

3.9

4.0

Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire

n/a

n/a

4.7

4.7

4.5

South West Peninsula

n/a

n/a

4.8

4.4

4.6

Dorset and Somerset

n/a

n/a

4.6

4.3

4.4

South Yorkshire

n/a

n/a

4.3

4.3

4.0

Trent

n/a

n/a

5.1

4.9

4.8

Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland

n/a

n/a

4.9

4.7

4.7

Shropshire and Staffordshire

n/a

n/a

5.4

5.0

5.0

Birmingham and The Black Country

n/a

n/a

4.8

4.7

4.4

West Midlands South

n/a

n/a

5.2

4.8

4.7

n/a = Not applicable, sickness/absence data are not available by SHA area prior to 2002.

Notes:

1. Data for 2002 are of insufficient quality to produce data at a SHA level.

2. Sickness absence rate is defined as the amount of time lost through absences as a percentage of staff time available.

3. This does not cover maternity leave, carers leave or any periods of absence agreed under family friendly/flexible working policies.

4. General Practitioners and their staff are not included in the aforementioned figures.

5. Figures for strategic health authority areas are an average of all primary care trusts, other trusts and the strategic health authority organisations in that area.

6.Figures are for the calendar year.

Sources:

The Department’s Sickness/Absence survey 2000-04

The Information Centre for health and social care sickness/absence survey 2005

NHS: Working Hours

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what recent assessment he has made of the impact of the European working time directive on acute hospital services. (151543)

The new deal contract monitoring returns give an indication of national health service readiness for fully implementing the working time directive 48-hour week for doctors in training. Monitoring information for September 2006 is published on the NHS Employers website at

www.nhsemployers.org/pay-conditions/pay-conditions-467.cfm.

Collection of the 2007 new deal monitoring information will commence this autumn.

Nurses: Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the answer of 18 July 2007, Official Report, columns 470-1W, on nurses: children, how many of the duplicate records identified paediatric nurses. (152974)

In 2006 the census data reported a total of 18,634 qualified nursing staff working within the paediatric area of work. The validation process prior to publication identified and removed 135 duplicate records from the paediatric area of work.

Nurses: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) district nurses, (b) nursing auxiliaries, (c) school nurses, (d) mental handicap nurses, (e) community psychiatric nurses, (f) treatment nurses, (g) community midwives and (h) health visitors were employed in the NHS in each year since 2000; and what the projected figures are for each year to 2010, broken down by health trust. (151054)

This information has been placed in the Library.

The annual workforce census does not identify mental handicap nurses, treatment nurses or community midwives seperately from the rest of the nursing workforce. Comprehensive data on school nurses have only been collected centrally since 2004.

Projected figures for each year to 2010, broken down by health trust are not collected centrally.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many specialist nurses were employed in the NHS in each of the last five years. (151055)

The annual workforce census does not identify the number of specialist nurses.

The workforce census records the number of qualified nurses, midwives and health visitors under the several different branches of nursing which are acute, elderly and general, paediatric, maternity, psychiatry, learning disabilities, community services and education staff.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans his Department has to increase the number of specialist nurses employed in the NHS. (151056)

Workforce planning is a matter for local determination. It is for local workforce planners to determine the specialist nursing needs of their local population with appropriate support from the workforce review team, national workforce projects and NHS Employers.

Nurses: Recruitment

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will estimate the effect on the cost to the public purse of changing from current recruitment practices for nurses to an all-graduate intake for new nurses. (146289)

As part of modernising nursing careers, the Nursing and Midwifery Council is reviewing the content and level of pre-registration education. If a graduate workforce is deemed appropriate, the costs and benefits of such a change will be taken into account.

Nutrition: Costs

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what recent estimate he has made of the costs to (a) the NHS and (b) society as a whole of (i) obesity and (ii) undernutrition. (153407)

‘Tackling Child Obesity—First Steps’, a joint report from the National Audit Office, Healthcare Commission and Audit Commission published in February 2006, put the cost of obesity to the national health service at around £1 billion a year, with an additional £2.3 billion to £2.6 billion a year cost to the economy as a whole. Information on the cost of undernutrition to the NHS is not collected centrally.

Nutrition: Health Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans he has to incorporate indicators of nutrition and diet in the Quality and Outcomes Framework of the new General Medical Services contract. (153408)

Currently there are eight points available in the quality and outcomes framework (QOF) rewarding practices for maintaining a register of patients aged 16 and over with a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 30. The register includes people whose BMI has been recorded in practice as part of routine care.

There are currently no plans to incorporate indicators of nutrition and diet in the QOF. However, as part of the ongoing development of the framework, indicators will be subject to continuing review in the light of emerging evidence, in the context of a value for money agreement.

Obesity: Young People

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what recent assessment he has made of whether the public service agreement target to halt the year on year rise in obesity among children under 11 by 2010 will be met. (152251)

The obesity public service agreement (PSA) will be assessed by comparing Health Survey for England figures for aggregate three-year periods, which are used to account for the limited sample size.

This is a very challenging PSA target. Progress has been made:

Ofcom and the Committee of Advertising Practice have announced restrictions to limit advertising of products high in fat, sugar and salt to children;

80 per cent. of pupils participate in at least two hours of high quality physical education and school sport a week;

new, tougher nutritional standards for school food have been announced; and

the Top Tips for Top Mums campaign helps parents tackle the four key barriers to children eating fruit and vegetables (cost, fussy eaters, limited time/cooking skills and a lack of structured meal occasions).

Internationally, our approach is regarded as good practice, informing, for example, the WHO Europe Charter on Counteracting Obesity published in November 2006.

Organs: Donors

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what strategy is in place to increase the number of organ donors. (151768)

The Department launched “Saving Lives, Valuing Donors: A transplant framework for England” in 2003 and the National Service Framework for Renal Services in 2004. These set out the Department's key aims for organ and tissue transplantation over the following 10 years. Government investment in hospital-based funding has helped increase donor rates and an organ donor taskforce will report to Ministers in autumn 2007 on how organ donor rates can be further improved.

Patients

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what models are used by his Department to determine patient flows between major general hospitals; and what assessment he has made of their accuracy. (151467)

The Department has not used models to determine patient flows between major general hospitals. This work is considered at a local level.

Patients: Nutrition

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average expenditure was on each patient main meal delivered in hospital in (a) cash terms and (b) current prices in each year since 1997. (153395)

Information on the average expenditure on each patient main meal is in the following table. The actual amounts shown are as collected from the national health service in the financial year in question. Information on the basis of constant prices is neither collected nor calculated centrally. The data were not collected before 2001-02.

In respect of hospital food services, there is no relationship between cost and quality.

Average amount spent per patient main meal (£)

2001-02

2.19

2002-03

2.41

2003-04

2.37

2004-05

2.60

2005-06

2.65

In-patients are expected to receive three main meals per day. The expenditure shown includes the cost of provisions and staff costs.

Since 2004-05, the data provided have not been collected on a mandatory basis and therefore may not be complete.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate he has made of the average additional cost of treating a patient in hospital per episode of care if the patient is undernourished. (153396)

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when he intends to publish the joint departmental and stakeholder nutrition action plan; which stakeholders are involved in developing the plan; and if he will make a statement. (153399)

The Department intends to publish the action plan, which was discussed at the second Nutrition Summit on 17 July, in the autumn. A wide range of stakeholders are involved in its development. These stakeholders are shown in the following list.

Age Concern

Association of Directors of Adult Social Services

British Medical Association

British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

British Dietetic Association

Caroline Walker Trust

Commission for Social Care Inspection

Council of Europe Alliance

English Community Care Association

Food Standards Agency

Healthcare Commission

Help the Aged

Hospital Caterers Association

Local Government Association

National Association of Care Caterers

National Health Service Core Learning Unit

National Institute of Health & Clinical Excellence

National Nurses Nutrition Group

National Patient Safety Agency

Patients Association

People First

Purchasing and Supply Agency

Royal Institute of Public Health

Royal College of Nurses

Skills for Care

Skills for Health

Sustain

United Kingdom Home Care Association

Water UK

Physiotherapy: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the change in numbers of (a) junior physiotherapists and (b) senior physiotherapists employed in the NHS was between April 2001 and April 2007. (150895)

This information is not collected centrally. The annual work force census, published by the Information Centre for health and social care, does not identify physiotherapists by grade.

The total number of physiotherapists employed in the NHS increased by 5,577 between 1997 and 2006 (the latest data we have) to 19,820.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many physiotherapy graduates are registered with NHS Jobs. (150896)

There were 537 physiotherapy graduates registered on the national health service jobs talent pool as at 17 July 2007.

Pregnant Women: Alcoholic Drinks

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what plans he has to implement training programmes for health care professionals on the prevention, diagnosis and management of the full range of foetal alcohol spectrum disorders; and if he will make a statement; (148556)

(2) what assessment he has made of the training, guidance and resources available in the NHS for routine screening of alcohol consumption by pregnant women;

(3) what research he has (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated on the clinical management of individuals affected by foetal alcohol spectrum disorders; and what support systems are available to them and their carers and families.

The Department is not responsible for setting curriculums for health professional training. However, the Department does share a commitment with statutory and professional bodies to ensure that all health professionals are appropriately trained, so that they have the skills and knowledge to deliver a high-quality health service to all groups of the population, whatever their condition.

The Department has funded the production of guidance to support the effective delivery of high quality training on substance misuse, including alcohol, within undergraduate medical education in the United Kingdom. Compilation of Substance Misuse in the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum was overseen by an expert steering group and published by the International Centre for Drugs Policy in April 2007.

Although the Department has not made an assessment of the training, guidance and resources available in the national health service for routine screening of alcohol consumption by pregnant women, midwives routinely ask about alcohol consumption during booked antenatal appointments. The Department has also recently reworded its advice on alcohol and pregnancy. The revised advice states that pregnant women or women trying to conceive should avoid drinking alcohol. If they do choose to drink, to minimise the risk to the baby, they should not drink more than one to two units of alcohol once or twice a week, and should not get drunk.

The Department has not commissioned or evaluated research on the clinical management of individuals affected by foetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). However, the Government welcome the British Medical Association’s recently published guide for health care professionals on FASD which will serve to raise awareness of this and provide important advice for diagnosis and those caring for patients affected by this condition.

Prescriptions: Contraceptives

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) courses of contraception and (b) contraceptive devices were prescribed to persons (i) over 16 and (ii) in each age group under 16 in each year since 1997. (150971)

The information available on supply of contraception and contraceptive devices supplied by community contraceptive clinics has been placed in the Library. Data in each age group under 16 can be provided only at disproportionate cost.

The information shown as follows is for prescriptions dispensed in the community (almost all of these prescriptions are written by general practice). Data by age are not available.

Thousand

Regular methods of contraception1

Contraceptive devices2

1997

8,246.0

102.8

1998

8,246.1

99.4

1999

8,245.4

96.1

2000

8,241.7

89.7

2001

8,239.7

85.5

2002

8,237.1

82.3

2003

8,234.1

81.7

2004

8,231.3

81.4

2005

8,223.4

87.7

2006

8,208.9

101.9

1 Includes tablets, injections (including depo injections) and patches.

2 Includes implants, IUDs and IUSs.

Source:

Prescription information is taken from the Prescription Cost Analysis (PCA) system, supplied by the Prescription Pricing Division (PPD) of the Business Services Authority (BSA), and is based on a full analysis of all prescriptions dispensed in the community ie by community pharmacists and appliance contractors, dispensing doctors, and prescriptions submitted by prescribing doctors for items personally administered in England. The data do not cover drugs dispensed in hospitals.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health on how many occasions the morning after pill was prescribed (a) in total and (b) to girls under 16 by (i) family planning clinics, (ii) general practitioners, (iii) hospital accident and emergency departments, (iv) school nurses and (v) pharmacists since 1997. (150979)

The information available on emergency hormonal contraception (EHC) supplied by community contraceptive clinics is shown in the following table.

Occasions on which emergency hormonal contraceptives were supplied at community contraceptive clinics by specified age and year—England

Thousand

All ages

Of which: Under 16

1997-98

205.1

22.5

1998-99

209.9

21.5

1999-2000

233.0

23.1

2000-01

228.8

25.2

2001-02

192.0

25.5

2002-03

188.0

26.9

2003-04

1183.2

27.0

2004-05

174.1

24.4

2005-06

164.5

22.0

1 Data revised in 2004-05 publication.

Notes:

Data prior to 2004-05 reused with the permission of the Department of Health.

Source:

The Information Centre KT31 return.

The available data on the number of items of EHC prescribed by general practitioners are shown in the following table. Data by age are not available.

Year1

General practitioners (Thousand)

2003

368.2

2004

333.2

2005

302.9

2006

280.6

Source:

1 ePACT system, this contains a maximum of 60 months data

Information is not available on the supply of EHC by hospital accident and emergency departments and school nurses and up until the end of 2006 no pharmacists had written prescriptions for EHC.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what plans he has to tackle the spread of genital warts, especially among people between 16 and 25; (152439)

(2) what assessment his Department has made of the impact of the incidence of genital warts on genito- urinary medicine clinical resources.

Genital warts is the most frequently diagnosed viral sexually transmitted infection (STI) in genito-urinary clinics in England. In 2006, the highest rates of genital warts were in both the 16-19 and 20-24 year age groups in women and in the 20-24 year old age group in men. Most cases of genital warts are asymptomatic and resolve spontaneously in healthy individuals.

To tackle the spread of STIs we have set a target that 100 per cent. of patients attending a genito-urinary medicine service are offered an appointment to be seen within 48 hours. We are already seeing excellent progress on this. Data from the Genito-Urinary Medicine Access Monthly Monitoring return showed that in May 2007, 85 per cent. of first attendances were offered an appointment to be seen within 48 hours of contacting a service. This compares with 58 per cent. in May 2006.

Last November we launched a new adult sexual health campaign, “Condom Essential Wear”, which aims to normalise condom use among sexually active adults. The campaign focuses on STIs most prevalent in the target 18-24 year old age group.

Skills for Health

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many primary care trusts are running a skills for health programme; and how much this has cost. (152238)

Skilled for Health early adopter partnerships are planned between local health and education bodies to provide local models of delivery for wider dissemination and as models of best practice to support wider rollout. Learning from these partnerships will be used to inform primary care trust (PCT) programmes.

Phase 1 of Skilled for Health was completed in 2006 and the teaching resources developed were published in November 2006 as part of the embedded learning curriculum content for the Skills for Life programme. They are available at no cost to PCTs and their partners from Prolog (0845 60 222 600). Copies are available in the Library. Information on how these materials are being used locally to establish Skilled for Health programmes in PCTs in not collected centrally.

Smoking: Health Hazards

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the incidence of smoking-related diseases including (a) lung cancer, (b) heart disease and (c) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was in (i) Hampshire and (ii) England in each year since 1997. (151059)

The information is not available in the format requested. Figures are available from Hospital Episode Statistics on the number of Finished Consultant Episodes (FCEs) in national health service hospitals in England with a primary diagnosis of diseases that can be caused by smoking. It is acknowledged that not all these FCEs which can be caused by smoking will be attributable to smoking as there are other contributory factors in these diseases. Therefore for England, the relative risks of these diseases for current and ex-smokers compared to non-smokers can be used to estimate smoking-attributable FCEs. The following tables provide either the number of FCEs that can be caused by smoking or estimates of the number of smoking-attributable FCEs.

Table 1 shows the number of FCEs in England, for people of all ages, with a primary diagnosis of various diseases which can be caused by smoking for 1996-97 through to 2005-06.

Table 2 shows the number of FCEs in England, for those aged 35 and over, with a primary diagnosis of various diseases which can be caused by smoking, and estimates of the number of these which can be attributed to smoking. Figures have been provided for 2004-05, as this is first and most recent year for which data on estimates of diseases which can be attributed to smoking are available. Figures are shown for those aged 35 and over only, because relative risks used to estimate the attributable numbers are only available for this age group.

Table 3 shows the number of FCEs in Hampshire and Isle of Wight strategic health authority (SHA), for all ages, with a primary diagnosis of various diseases which can be caused by smoking for 1996-97 through to 2005-06.

Relative risks of diseases for current and ex-smokers are not available at SHA level, so analysis estimating the numbers of smoking-attributable FCEs at SHA level cannot be provided.

Table 1 National health service1 finished consultant episodes (FCEs)2 in England where there was a primary diagnosis3 of diseases that can be caused by smoking, 1996-97 to 2005-064,5, in England

Finished Consultant Episodes

Selected diagnoses

ICD-10 diagnoses codes

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-2000

2000-01

All diseases caused in part by smoking

1,214,661

1,317,024

1,381,450

1,408,136

1,418,914

Cancers caused in part by smoking

261,007

298,917

303,065

315,727

315,856

Lung

C33-C34

62,032

70,952

73,794

79,604

78,805

Upper respiratory sites

C00-C14,C32

14,092

18,343

19,227

20,812

17,999

Oesophagus

C15

22,175

25,159

26,511

30,049

32,463

Bladder

C67

76,415

81,525

84,351

83,341

80,504

Kidney

C64-C66,C68

9,553

10,280

10,192

10,897

11,134

Stomach

C16

23,428

25,072

25,609

26,468

28,552

Pancreas

C25

11,315

12,677

13,222

14,589

16,300

Unspecified site

C80

15,846

24,894

17,555

17,037

16,923

Myeloid leukaemia

C92

26,151

30,015

32,604

32,930

33,176

Respiratory diseases caused in part by smoking

203,582

214,277

243,872

249,038

238,193

Chronic obstructive lung disease

J40-J44

111,395

119,911

135,006

140,092

136,271

Pneumonia

J10-318

92,187

94,366

108,866

108,946

101,922

Circulatory diseases caused in part by smoking

507,096

551,899

563,886

564,624

575,174

Ischaemic heart disease

I20-I25

322,317

354,688

363,098

366,081

378,532

Peripheral Arterial Disease

I739

31,168

31,924

29,763

27,967

26,576

Cerebrovascular disease

I60-I69

130,116

140,189

144,800

145,479

144,661

Aortic aneurysm

I71

13,645

14,235

14,914

14,657

14,963

Myocardial degeneration/ infarction

I51

1,853

1,972

2,030

2,132

2,157

Atherosclerosis

I70

7,997

8,891

9,281

8,308

8,285

Diseases of the digestive system caused in part by smoking

74,969

78,991

80,066

82,575

79,634

Stomach/duodenal ulcer

K25-K27

54,974

57,031

56,575

57,024

52,934

Crohn’s disease

K50

13,203

15,071

15,969

17,231

18,317

Periodontal disease

K05

6,792

6,889

7,522

8,320

8,383

Other diseases caused in part by smoking

168,007

172,940

190,561

196,172

210,057

Senile cataract

H25

54,189

58,875

74,410

79,898

95,127

Hip fracture

S72

70,544

72,265

74,798

76,668

75,365

Spontaneous abortion

O03

43,274

41,800

41,353

39,606

39,565

Selected diagnoses

ICD-10 diagnoses codes

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

All diseases caused in part by smoking

1,463,872

1,551,970

1,632,929

1,671,282

1,730,478

Cancers caused in part by smoking

317,438

329,310

336,250

345,755

373,212

Lung

C33-C34

76,867

79,252

84,251

89,900

98,340

Upper respiratory sites

C00-C14,C32

16,882

16,910

17,976

19,281

21,308

Oesophagus

C15

34,844

37,104

38,106

38,756

42,121

Bladder

C67

78,597

79,778

78,977

78,561

83,362

Kidney

C64-C66,C68

11,581

12,883

13,314

14,289

15,968

Stomach

C16

28,900

29,418

29,197

28,952

30,806

Pancreas

C25

17,986

19,184

21,040

23,105

25,938

Unspecified site

C80

17,200

17,713

17,301

17,532

17,656

Myeloid leukaemia

C92

34,581

37,068

36,088

35,379

37,713

Respiratory diseases caused in part by smoking

263,422

281,221

323,295

338,920

357,154

Chronic obstructive lung disease

J40-J44

144,010

149,914

174,140

177,369

178,683

Pneumonia

J10-318

119,412

131,307

149,155

161,551

178,471

Circulatory diseases caused in part by smoking

588,209

621,943

634,149

641,253

653,511

Ischaemic heart disease

I20-I25

387,073

408,893

418,344

421,386

428,262

Peripheral Arterial Disease

I739

24,641

22,656

20,391

18,903

17,856

Cerebrovascular disease

I60-I69

151,340

164,255

167,142

172,180

178,321

Aortic aneurysm

I71

14,362

15,065

15,277

15,564

15,606

Myocardial degeneration/ infarction

I51

2,398

2,615

2,982

3,057

3,524

Atherosclerosis

I70

8,395

8,459

10,013

10,163

9,942

Diseases of the digestive system caused in part by smoking

77,901

77,995

80,453

80,631

87,023

Stomach/duodenal ulcer

K25-K27

49,653

48,173

46,857

44,544

44,549

Crohn’s disease

K50

20,152

21,610

24,750

26,922

32,288

Periodontal disease

K05

8,096

8,212

8,846

9,165

10,186

Other diseases caused in part by smoking

216,902

241,501

258,782

264,723

259,578

Senile cataract

H25

97,103

108,817

124,618

128,044

115,903

Hip fracture

S72

78,445

89,075

90,739

92,626

97,475

Spontaneous abortion

O03

41,354

43,609

43,425

44,053

46,200

1 The data include private patients in the NHS (but not private patients in private hospitals).

2 The data refers to Finished Consultant Episodes (FCE). An FCE is defined as a period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. Please note that the figures do not represent the number of patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the year.

3 The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 14 (7 prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data set and provides the main reason why the patient was in hospital.

4 The figures include people whose gender was not known or not specified.

5 Figures shown are based on all ages.

Source:

Hospital Episode Statistics. The Information Centre, 2006

Table 2: Finished Consultant Episodes (FCEs)1 among adults aged 35 and over2, with a primary diagnosis of diseases that can be caused by smoking, and the estimated number of these FCEs that can be attributed3 to smoking as a percentage of all admissions from that disease, 2004-054, in England

Number/percentage

Diagnosis (ICD 10)

Observed FCEs5

Attributable number6

Attributable percentage

All diseases caused in part by smoking

1,573,395

559,800

36

Cancers caused in part by smoking

335,707

172,400

51

Lung

89,547

75,800

85

Upper respiratory sites

18,614

12,900

69

Oesophagus

38,484

26,200

68

Bladder

78,177

30,500

39

Kidney

12,132

3,400

28

Stomach

28,639

7,300

25

Pancreas

22,967

6,000

26

Unspecified site

17,244

6,300

37

Myeloid leukaemia

29,903

4,200

14

Respiratory diseases caused in part by smoking

315,927

177,300

56

Chronic obstructive lung disease

176,294

147,300

84

Pneumonia

139,633

30,000

21

Circulatory diseases caused in part by smoking

636,226

158,100

25

Ischaemic heart disease

419,513

106,200

25

Peripheral Arterial Disease

18,797

15,800

84

Cerebrovascular disease

169,584

24,200

14

Aortic aneurysm

15,457

9,500

62

Myocardial infarction

2,802

600

21

Atherosclerosis

10,073

1,900

19

Diseases of the digestive system caused in part by smoking

59,765

26,400

44

Stomach/duodenal ulcer

41,879

22,200

53

Crohn’s disease

15,205

3,000

20

Periodontal disease

2,681

1,200

46

Other diseases caused in part by smoking

225,770

25,500

11

Age related cataract among those aged 45 and over

127,111

15,500

12

Hip fracture among those aged 55 and over

85,641

9,200

11

Spontaneous abortion

13,018

700

6

1 An FCE is defined as a period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. Figures do not represent the number of patients, as a patient may have more than one episode of care within the year.

2 Figures have been presented for adults aged 35 and over unless otherwise specified

3 More information on the methodology used to calculate these estimates are available in the Statistics on Smoking: England, 2006 publication produced by The Information Centre for health and social care, which is available in the House of Commons.

4 The data include private patients in NHS hospitals (but not private patients in private hospitals).

5 Observed admissions only includes those where gender was recorded

6 Estimated attributable number, rounded to the nearest 100.

Source:

Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). The Information Centre

Table 3. National health service1 finished consultant episodes (FCEs)2 in Hampshire and Isle of Wight strategic health authority where there was a primary diagnosis3 of diseases that can be caused by smoking, 1996-97 to 2005-064,5

Finished Consultant Episodes

ICD-10 diagnoses codes

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-2000

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

All diseases caused in part by smoking

39,083

42,227

45,139

46,511

49,257

51,104

54,516

58,350

60,982

60,338

Cancers caused in part by smoking

8,401

9,925

9,496

9,578

10,312

10,104

10,403

10,304

10,730

11,218

Lung

C33-C34

1,757

2,017

1,851

1,926

2,125

2,176

2,106

1,972

2,063

2,367

Upper respiratory sites

C00-C14,C32

475

532

572

477

542

516

511

491

572

527

Oesophagus

C15

654

801

797

1,019

1,091

1,152

1,138

1,119

1,043

1,144

Bladder

C67

2,486

2,906

2,941

2,758

2,905

2,669

2,771

2,703

2,690

2,711

Kidney

C64-C66,C68

355

485

410

429

482

602

575

570

665

631

Stomach

C16

633

760

675

757

686

654

741

695

666

563

Pancreas

C25

408

415

450

406

547

567

553

587

521

706

Unspecified site

C80

519

602

588

531

505

638

855

755

763

575

Myeloid leukaemia

C92

1,114

1,407

1,212

1,275

1,429

1,130

1,153

1,412

1,747

1,994

Respiratory diseases caused in part by smoking

5,760

5,834

6,865

7,701

7,489

9,327

10,659

13,354

14,031

13,696

Chronic obstructive lung disease

J40-J44

2,517

2,598

3,230

3,516

3,592

4,987

5,655

7,264

7,338

7,043

Pneumonia

J10-J18

3,243

3,236

3,635

4,185

3,897

4,340

5,004

6,090

6,693

6,653

Circulatory diseases caused in part by smoking

15,841

16,711

18,222

18,363

20,342

20,370

22,541

23,000

23,451

22,422

Ischaemic heart disease

I20-I25

9,737

10,702

11,491

11,446

13,329

13,356

14,650

15,236

15,214

14,385

Peripheral Arterial Disease

I739

1,179

997

835

698

839

753

751

684

601

592

Cerebrovascular disease

I60-I69

4,226

4,203

4,716

5,135

5,207

5,364

6,030

5,904

6,522

6,229

Aortic aneurysm

I71

517

513

614

554

517

507

528

513

565

528

Myocardial degeneration/ infarction

I51

67

114

101

110

153

107

135

93

123

236

Atherosclerosis

I70

115

182

465

420

297

283

447

570

426

452

Diseases of the digestive system caused in part by smoking

2,793

3,166

3,530

3,550

3,351

3,438

3,231

3,389

3,828

3,943

Stomach/duodenal ulcer

K25-K27

1,984

2,094

2,220

2,178

1,893

1,850

1,677

1,508

1,730

1,645

Crohn’s disease

K50

484

607

599

589

763

989

927

1,124

1,349

1,433

Periodontal disease

K05

325

465

711

783

695

599

627

757

749

865

Other diseases caused in part by smoking

6,288

6,591

7,026

7,319

7,763

7,865

7,682

8,303

8,942

9,059

Senile cataract

H25

2,005

2,266

2,802

3,074

3,253

3,281

3,115

3,548

4,038

4,119

Hip fracture

S72

2,768

2,849

2,934

3,088

3,336

3,421

3,846

3,904

4,048

4,050

Spontaneous abortion

O03

1,515

1,476

1,290

1,157

1,174

1,163

721

851

856

890

1 The data include private patients in the NHS (but not private patients in private hospitals).

2 The data refers to Finished Consultant Episodes (FCE). An FCE is defined as a period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. Please note that the figures do not represent the number of patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the year.

3 The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 14 (7 prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data set and provides the main reason why the patient was in 4 The figures include people whose gender was not known or not specified.

5 Figures shown are based on all ages.

Source:

Hospital Episode Statistics. The Information Centre, 2006

Smoking: Public Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what measures his Department has put in place to monitor the spending by local authorities of money allocated by his Department to enforce the smoking ban. (153629)

Surgery

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) in-patient and (b) day case procedures were carried out (i) in England and (ii) in each strategic health authority area (A) for both elective and non-elective procedures and (B) for elective procedures only in each year since 1997-98; and what percentage of day cases each category represented of the total case procedures delivered in each strategic health authority area in the latest year for which figures are available. (149486)

Vaccination: Aluminium

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what levels of aluminium are contained in each vaccine provided to children; and if he will make a statement; (152765)

(2) what assessment he has made of the safe levels of aluminium in vaccines routinely provided to (a) babies and (b) children.

Aluminium salts are an essential ingredient of some vaccines in enhancing the protection offered by the vaccine. The safety record of aluminium in vaccines has been demonstrated over more than 50 years of use. There are no serious health risks associated with the small quantities of aluminium in some vaccines. As with many vaccine ingredients, aluminium can cause localised reactions such as redness, swelling and/or tenderness at the injection site.

The information on levels of aluminium in childhood vaccines is in the following table.

Childhood vaccines aluminium content

Aluminium content

PL number

Vaccine (disease)

Formulation

SPC (2)*

Label

00011/0245

Meningitec Vial (Meningitis C)

Aluminium phosphate 0.5mg per 0.5ml

0.125mg A13+

Aluminium phosphate 0.125mg A13+

00116/0351

Neisvac-C (Meningitis C)

Aluminium hydroxide 0.5mg per 0.5ml

Aluminium hydroxide hydrated 0.5mg A13+

Aluminium hydroxide hydrated 0.5mg A13+

06745/0076

M-M-R II vaccine injection (Measles, Mumps and Rubella)

None present

n/a

n/a

06745/0120

Pediacel injection (Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and haemophilius influenzae type b (Hib))

Aluminium phosphate 1.5mg per 0.5ml

0.33±0.05mg A13+ calculated

Aluminium phosphate

06745/0121

Repevax injection (Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio)

Aluminium phosphate 0.33mg per 0.5ml

0.33mg

Aluminium phosphate 0.33mg

06745/0122

Repevax injection (Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio)

Aluminium phosphate 0.33mg per 0.5ml

0.33mg

Not legible

06745/0123

Revaxis injection (Tetanus, diphtheria, polio)

Aluminium hydroxide 0.35mg per 0.5ml

Aluminium hydroxide 0.35mg

Not legible

10592/0110

Priorix vaccine injection (Measles, Mumps and Rubella)

None present

n/a

n/a

10592/0209

Infanrix IPV vaccine injection (Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio)

Aluminium oxide hydrated 0.5mg

0.5mg

Aluminium hydroxide

10592/0216

Infanrix-IPV-Hib vaccine (Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, haemophilius influenzae type b (Hib))

Aluminium hydroxide 0.5mg per 0.5ml

Aluminium hydroxide hydrated 0.5mg A13+

Aluminium hydroxide

10592/0217

Menitorix (Haemophilius influenzae type b (Hib/(Meningitis C))

None present

n/a

n/a

13767/0013-14

Menjugate vaccine injection and aluminium hydroxide solvent (Meningitis C)

Aluminium hydroxide 1mg per 0.5ml

Not on sentinel aluminium hydroxide 0.3 to 0.4mg A13+

Not on sentinel

EU/1/../167/...

Prevenar (Pneumococcal)

Aluminium phosphate 0.5mg per 0.5ml

Aluminium phosphate 0.5mg

Aluminium phosphate 0.5mg

Source:

Taken from electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC)

Vaccination: Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list the vaccines routinely given to (a) babies and (b) children. (152767)

The information required is in the following table.

Immunisation schedule

Age

What is given

How it is given

2 months old

Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) (DTaP/IPV/Hib)

One injection

Pneumococcal infection (Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, PCV)

One injection

3 months old

Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) (DTaP/IPV/Hib)

One injection

Meningitis C (meningococcal group C) (MenC)

One injection

4 months old

Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and Haemophilus influenzas type b (Hib) (DTaP/IPV/Hib)

One injection

Meningitis C (meningococcal group C) (MenC)

One injection

Pneumococcal infection (Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, PCV)

One injection

Around 12 months old

Haemophilus influenza type b (Hib) and meningitis C (Hib/MenC)

One injection

Around 13 months old

Measles, mumps and rubella (German measles) (MMR)

One injection

Pneumococcal infection (PCV)

One injection

3 years and 4 months to 5-years-old

Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough) and polio (dTaP/IPV or DTaP/IPV)

One injection

Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR)

One injection

13 to 18-years-old

Diphtheria, tetanus, polio (Td/IPV)

One injection

York Hospitals NHS Trust

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 13 December 2006, Official Report, column 1189W, on York Hospitals NHS Trust, how many finished consultant episodes there were in each specialty at York Hospitals NHS Trust in 2005-06; and if he will make a statement. (151618)

The requested information is set out in the following table.

Count of Finished Consultant Episodes by Main Specialty for provider code RCB ‘York Hospitals NHS Trust’ for 2005-06

Main specialty

Main specialty description

FCEs

100

General Surgery

9,512

101

Urology

6,244

110

Trauma and Orthopaedics

5,371

120

Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT)

2,181

130

Ophthalmology

3,509

140

Oral Surgery

1,574

180

Accident and Emergency

1,693

190

Anaesthetics

2,018

300

General Medicine

20,389

303

Clinical Haematology

1,206

330

Dermatology

26

370

Medical Oncology

225

400

Neurology

468

410

Rheumatology

568

420

Paediatrics

4,835

430

Geriatric Medicine

9,193

502

Gynaecology

9,199

560

Midwife episode

2,998

810

Radiology

*

822

Chemical Pathology

376

Notes:

1. Finished Consultant Episode (FCE)

An FCE is defined as a period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. The figures do not represent the number of patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the year.

2. Main Specialty

The main specialty refers to the specialty under which the consultant is contracted.

3. Specialty

Care is needed when analysing Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data by specialty, or by groups of specialties (such as acute). Trusts have different ways of managing specialties and attributing codes so it is better to analyse by specific diagnoses, operations or other recorded information.

4. Low Numbers

Due to reasons of confidentiality, figures between 1 and 5 have been suppressed and replaced with ‘*’(an asterisk).

5. Data Quality

HES are compiled from data sent by over 300 national health service trusts and primary care trusts in England. The Information Centre for health and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data via HES processes. While this brings about improvement over time, some shortcomings remain.

6. Ungrossed Data

Figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data (ie the data are ungrossed).

Source: HES, The Information Centre for Health and Social Care.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the (a) average and (b) maximum waiting time for (i) in-patient and (ii) day case admissions was at York Hospitals NHS Trust for the quarters ending (1) December 2006, (2) March 2007 and (3) June 2007. (151619)

The requested information is show in the following table.

Day case/inpatient

Median wait

Maximum wait

December 2006

Day case

8.5 weeks

25 to <26 weeks

December 2006

Inpatient

7.8 weeks

25 to <26 weeks

March 2007

Day case

6.7 weeks

19 to <20 weeks

March 2007

Inpatient

6.5 weeks

19 to <20 weeks

Source: Department of Health, NHS Finance, Performance and Operations.

Westmoreland General Hospital

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) if he will consider upgrading Westmorland General Hospital to full district general hospital status; (152872)

(2) if he will consider supporting the provision of full consultant-led acute admissions services at Westmorland General Hospital.

It is the responsibility of primary care trusts (PCTs) locally to plan and commission services to meet the needs of its residents and in line with the resources available.

Proposals relating to the Westmorland General Hospital, which is managed by the University Hospitals of Morecambe Hospital Trust, were consulted on between June and September 2006. The preferred option has since been subject to further work and will now be taken forward as part of the Cumbria whole systems review. Consultation is due to begin in September.