Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 479: debated on Wednesday 17 September 2008

Written Answers to Questions

The following answers were received between Monday 15 September and Tuesday 16 September 2008

Communities and Local Government

Antisocial Behaviour

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many anti-social behaviour injunctions have been issued since April 2007. (224099)

Social landlords (including local authorities and registered social landlords) can apply for injunctions to tackle antisocial behaviour under the Housing Act 1996. These are commonly known as antisocial behaviour injunctions. Using their powers under the Local Government Act 1972, local authorities may also apply to the civil courts for injunctions to restrain antisocial behaviour that constitutes a public nuisance.

Large registered social landlords (those owning and/or managing 1,000 or more units/bedspaces) successfully applied for 1,319 antisocial behaviour injunctions from April 2007 to March 2008. These figures were collected by the Housing Corporation. Figures for smaller registered social landlords are not available.

The Department has asked local authorities to submit information for 2007-08 on antisocial behaviour injunctions and those injunctions available to them under the Local Government Act 1972. These figures are not yet available.

Departmental Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government with reference to Annex B, Table 1 of her Department's annual report 2008, what proportion of the provision recorded as unallocated for (a) 2008-09, (b) 2009-10 and (c) 2010-11 has now been allocated. (224037)

None. Any changes involving proposed use of Departmental Unallocated Provision for 2008-09 will be included in the Department's Winter or Spring Supplementary Estimates and accompanying Ministerial Statements to the House. As yet, none of the 2009-10 and 2010-11 allocations have been allocated to a programme.

Housing: Floods

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate her Department has made of (a) the number of households displaced and (b) the amount of uninsured losses caused by the recent flooding, broken down by local authority area. (224198)

An assessment of the impact of the recent flooding is still being made and it is too early, at this stage, to assess how many households will be out of their homes for a significant period. Information by area is not available but in Morpeth, the worst affected area, it was estimated that around 500 residents attended the emergency rest centres. The information needed to assess the level of uninsured losses could only be gathered at disproportionate cost.

Local Authorities: Complaints

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many complaints the Standards Board for England has investigated in each of the last 10 years; and what the (a) outcome of the investigation and (b) consequent action taken was in each case. (224269)

The Standards Board for England came into existence in 2001 and its first full year of operation was 2002-03. The following tables show the number of investigations dealt with per financial year and the outcomes of those investigations, and the consequent action taken in each case.

Number of investigations and their outcome

Investigation findings

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

No evidence of breach

114

154

310

119

128

73

No further action

211

462

947

459

182

126

No further action taken as there was no power to refer a matter locally

30

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Referred to local authority standards committee

n/a

58

78

66

12

15

Referred to Adjudication Panel for England

1109

87

111

94

9

8

Direction to monitoring officer for other action

n/a

n/a

0

12

46

71

Total cases

466

761

1,446

750

377

364

1 One of which was an interim report

Consequent action

Sanctions

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

No breach

1

6

12

15

6

2

Censure

18

26

18

1

Suspension and training

1

2

Suspension

1

39

53

49

5

7

Suspension and censure

2

Censure and training

1

Suspension and apology

1

Suspension or apology/training

2

Suspension, training and apology

Censure, training and apology

No further action

1

7

15

29

5

Partial suspension

1

3

Partial suspension, training and apology

1

Partial suspension, training, apology and censure

1

Suspension, training and censure

Training

1

1

Apology

Apology and training

2

Withdrawn/other

1

1

Disqualified

27

97

25

31

6

7

This table reflects that in some cases the investigation and subsequent action were in different financial years, and that for some cases there were two or more consequent actions taken.

Members: Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government when she will answer the letter of 4 August 2008 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton, with regard to Rev David Gray. (224119)

Planning: South East

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will make it her policy to ensure that responses to the current South East Plan consultation made in writing but not on an official Government Office for the South East response form will be fully considered as part of the consultation process. (224242)

We have set up a consultation portal

http://gose.limehouse.co.uk/portal

in order to make it easier for people to respond electronically. However, we will, of course, consider written representation whether using the comments form or not.

Repossession Orders

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many homes were repossessed (a) in each local housing authority area and (b) nationwide in each of the last four quarters for which figures are available. (224110)

There are two independent sources of data on actual numbers of mortgage possessions, the Council of Mortgage Lenders and the Financial Services Authority. However, both are only available for the United Kingdom as a whole.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders data is available on its website at

http://www.cml.org.Uk/cml/filegrab/3AP4.xls?ref=2753

The Financial Services Authority data is available on its website at

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Returns/IRR/statistics/

Respite Care

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what information is collected by local authorities on the number and percentage of disabled children in each locality accessing short breaks services; what analysis her Department has made of such data; and if she will make a statement. (224093)

I have been asked to reply.

Although local authority data on disabled children's access to short break services is not currently available, the Department for Children, Schools and Families has asked authorities to begin to collect this data as part of the Children in Need (CIN) Census. The first CIN Census is a child-level data collection that will run from 1 October 2008 to 31 March 2009. Data will be submitted to the Department by the end of June 2009 and published in autumn 2009. Figures on the number of children accessing short breaks will then be provided through the CIN Census on an annual basis for each financial year from 2009-10 onwards.

For a limited period beginning in April 2009, the DCSF will also monitor local authority progress in growing short break services through complementary information collected as part of the Aiming High for Disabled Children delivery programme.

Standards Board for England: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the (a) administration costs and (b) average costs per case for the Standards Board for England were in each of the last 10 years. (224270)

Average costs per case are shown in the following table.

£

2004-05

6,492

2005-06

6,380

2006-07

6,765

2007-08

11,817

The Standards Board does not disaggregate administration costs, which are included in the figures.

Health

Allotments

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment he has made of the public health effects of people maintaining allotments. (224034)

No specific considerations have been given to the health benefits of maintaining an allotment, but cultivating an allotment represents a rewarding opportunity for building physical activity into everyday life for those seeking an alternative to sport or other structured exercise. There is also evidence that exercising in a natural environment can bring additional benefits for health and wellbeing.

There is also value in children growing their own food and recognising where food comes from as a real incentive to eating their Five a Day.

Colorectal Cancer: Screening

To ask the Secretary of State for Health in which areas of England bowel cancer screening has not yet commenced. (224206)

We are continuing to roll out the National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme and expect it to be fully implemented by December 2009. The following table lists the remaining primary care trusts where bowel cancer screening will commence in the final roll out.

Strategic health authority

Primary care trust

East Midlands

Lincolnshire

East of England

Luton

East of England

South East Essex

East of England

Bedfordshire

East of England

Peterborough

East of England

West Essex

East of England

North East Essex

East of England

Mid Essex

East of England

South West Essex

London

Bromley

London

Bexley Care Trust

London

Havering

North West

Blackburn with Darwen

North West

Stockport

North West

Tameside and Glossop

North West

East Lancashire

North West

Trafford

South Central

Oxfordshire

South Central

Isle of Wight

South Central

Milton Keynes

South Central

Buckinghamshire

South East Coast

Brighton and Hove City

South East Coast

Surrey

South East Coast

East Sussex Downs and Weald

South East Coast

Hastings and Rother

South East Coast

Eastern and Coastal Kent

South East Coast

Medway

South East Coast

West Kent

South West

Bath and North East Somerset

South West

Swindon

South West

Wiltshire

South West

Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

South West

South Gloucestershire

South West

North Somerset

South West

Bristol

West Midlands

Telford and Wrekin

West Midlands

Herefordshire

West Midlands

South Birmingham

West Midlands

Shropshire County

West Midlands

Worcestershire

Yorkshire and the Humber

Wakefield District

Yorkshire and the Humber

Calderdale

Yorkshire and the Humber

Leeds

Yorkshire and the Humber

Kirklees

Dementia: Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much expenditure his Department allocated to services for people with dementia-related illnesses resident in (a) Westmorland and Lonsdale, (b) Morecombe Bay Primary Care Trust area, (c) the North West region and (d) England in each of the last five years. (224038)

Disabled Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what information is gathered by primary care trusts on the number and percentage of disabled children in each catchment area accessing universal and specialist services; what collation of such information his Department has undertaken; and if he will make a statement. (224092)

This information is not available centrally. However, as part of the Public Service Agreement on the health and wellbeing of children, a disability indicator is being developed. This will be measured at local level from 2009-10.

Eyesight: Voucher Schemes

To ask the Secretary of State for Health for what reasons NHS optical vouchers cannot be issued following a private sight test. (224205)

National health service optical vouchers provide access to public funds and can only be issued following an NHS funded sight test. Optometrists and ophthalmic medical practitioners who conduct NHS funded sight tests must be approved and included on a primary care trust (PCT) performers list. As part of that approved role, they will also issue NHS optical vouchers.

The issuing of an optical voucher, following an NHS sight test by practitioners on a PCT performers list, provides protection to ensure that public funds are properly spent and vouchers issued appropriately, and provides a system of accountability to the NHS. If there is evidence of malpractice, the NHS can take steps against the practitioner, including if necessary, removing them from the performers list, which would prevent them for carrying out NHS funded sight tests and issuing optical vouchers. PCTs do not have the same remedies available in the case of private practitioners.

Health Services: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what the average cost was of a visit to a patient by the out of hours service in the latest period for which figures are available; (223418)

(2) what the average cost was of a consultation by the out of hours service in the latest period for which figures are available;

(3) what the average cost of an out of hours service telephone call providing advice or guidance was in the latest period for which figures are available.

The information requested is not held by the Department.

Primary care trusts (PCTs) now have a legal responsibility to ensure they provide, or secure provision of a high- quality, sustainable service for their local population. Therefore, it is the responsibility of PCTs to performance- manage the provision of out of hours service.

Measles: Vaccination

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment he has made of the effects of the level of immunisation against measles in east London; whether he plans to promote a programme for greater immunisation amongst those deemed most vulnerable; whether a separate measles vaccination is provided in circumstances in which parents prefer that option; what recent representations his Department has received on the computer system used to manage immunisation records; and if he will make a statement. (223995)

Information on vaccination uptake levels by primary care trusts is published annually by the Information Centre (a copy of the most recent report ‘NHS Immunisation Statistics, England: 2006-07' has already been placed in the Library). The Department is concerned about the low levels of MMR immunisation generally, and London in particular. In order to reduce the risk of measles outbreaks, an MMR catch-up campaign for England was launched on 6 August 2008. The letter from the Chief Medical Officer to primary care trusts details the priority groups that are most in need of the MMR immunisation.

The NHS does not recommend single measles, mumps or rubella vaccines because there is no evidence to support the use of single vaccines or to suggest that they are in any way “safer” than MMR. Every independent expert group around the world (including the World Health Organisation) supports the use of MMR, and none support the use of single vaccines.

The Department is an observer on the Child Health Board which is managing the implementation of the IT system that will replace Child Health Interim Application (CHIA) or London. London primary care trusts are represented on the board and can make representations regarding CHIA at this forum.

Medical Treatments: Lasers

To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether the deregulation of class 3B and 4 lasers and intense-pulsed light equipment will require (a) primary and (b) secondary legislation. (224243)

The regulation or deregulation of class 3B and 4 lasers and intense pulsed light equipment could be achieved using secondary legislation.

NHS Direct

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average cost to his Department is of a telephone call to the NHS Direct line, including the cost of staffing and other overheads. (223422)

The average cost of a telephone call to NHS Direct was £15.35 in 2007-08.

The figure is based on an average cost of all calls to NHS Direct, including calls to the 0845 4647 number, the Appointments Line and other services.

NHS: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what is the maximum debt that can be taken on by each (a) NHS trust and (b) NHS foundation trusts; and what each such trust's assets were at the latest date for which figures are available. (224241)

When it is necessary for a national health service trust to borrow for capital investment or working capital, the level of borrowing is primarily determined by its ability to service the debt. To inform its decision the Department calculates prudential borrowing limits for each NHS trust using a similar basis to that applied by Monitor to NHS foundation trusts (NHSFTs) under its prudential borrowing code. However, for NHS trusts, the Department ultimately makes the decision about how much capital or working capital is required and the source of finance.

The following information in respect of NHS trusts has been placed in the Library:

Prudential borrowing limits relating to 2008-09 for NHS trusts based on 2007-08 annual accounts data; and

Total value of assets held at 31 March 2008 for NHS trusts in existence on that date.

The information requested in relation to NHSFTs is not held centrally and is a matter for individual organisations. However, the annual reports and accounts of NHSFTs are publicly available on Monitor’s website

www.monitor-nhsft.gov.uk

The amount that NHSFTs can borrow is calculated in accordance with the Prudential borrowing code which is also available from Monitor. Individual borrowing limits have also been published by Monitor (the statutory name of which is the Independent Regulator of NHS Foundation Trusts) in “NHS Foundation Trusts: Review and Consolidated Accounts 2006-07”. As at 31 March 2007, the long term borrowing limit for 59 NHSFTs amounted to £2.2 billion which is in addition to working capital facilities of £884 million. As at 31 March 2008, for 89 NHSFTs these amounts had increased to£3.2 billion and £1.2 billion respectively.

NHS: Intimidation

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what incidences of bullying of (a) NHS and (b) his Department's staff have been reported in the last 12 months. (224240)

The Department does not collect data on specific incidences of bullying within the national health service; these are investigated at a local level.

However, information from staff is available from the NHS Staff survey. The survey is a key source of information relating to a range of workforce issues in the NHS and is undertaken annually. The results of the survey are used locally to drive improvement.

The 2007 NHS Staff survey shows that 18 per cent. of staff indicated that they had experienced harassment, bullying or abuse from other staff in the previous 12 months, while 26 per cent. of staff indicated that they had experienced harassment, bullying or abuse from patients or their relatives in the previous 12 months.

Following the NHS Staff survey results, the issue of harassment, bullying and abuse is one of the five key priorities that the National Social Partnership Forum (SPF) is taking forward. The SPF (employers, NHS trade unions and Department of Health working together on workforce issues) has sponsored work with NHS staff and managers to educate and train them to recognise, prevent and deal with bullying and harassment.

Within the Department, there have been five incidences of bullying reported in the last 12 months. This represents at most 0.2 per cent. of staff.

NHS: Northampton

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much NHS spending there was in Northampton in each year between 1998 and 2008. (224111)

The information is not available in the format requested. However, expenditure reported by the Northampton Teaching Primary Care Trust between 2002-03 and 2005-06 is shown in the following table.

Expenditure (£000)

2002-03

175,926

2003-04

215,924

2004-05

229,430

2005-06

254,423

Notes:

1. The Department holds no accounts figures by individual national health service organisations prior to 2000-01. In 2000-01 and 2001-02, the majority of the expenditure within Northampton was by the Northamptonshire Health Authority. Therefore, expenditure solely within Northampton cannot be separately identified.

2. Northampton Teaching PCT was established on 1 April 2002 and dissolved on 30 September 2006. Northamptonshire Teaching PCT included expenditure from the Northampton Teaching PCT in 2006-07 in its accounts and therefore cannot be separately identified.

3. Northampton Teaching PCT was merged with the Northamptonshire Heartlands PCT and the Daventry and South Northamptonshire PCT in October 2006 to form the Northamptonshire Teaching PCT.

4. This does not include all NHS spending within the Northampton area, as the element of spending by the East Midlands Strategic Health Authority within Northampton cannot be identified.

5. General dental services expenditure was accounted for by the Dental Practice Board and not by the PCT. Audited figures for Northampton cannot therefore be supplied.

6. The majority of pharmaceutical services expenditure was accounted for by the Prescription Pricing Authority and not by the PCT. Audited figures for Northampton cannot therefore be supplied.

7. Owing to lead commissioning arrangements where the lead PCT commissions on behalf of other consortium members, figures may not be consistent over time.

Source:

Audited summarisation schedules of Northampton Teaching PCT for 2002-03 to 2005-06.

NHS: Standards

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) if he will publish the targets set under the NHS efficiency index; (224031)

(2) whether the NHS efficiency target index is in operation.

There is not a national health service efficiency target index. As part of the last Comprehensive Spending Review settlement, the NHS is committed to delivering, over the period 2008-09-2010-11, 3 per cent. year-on-year efficiency improvements, which are cash-releasing, sustained and net of costs. This equates to annual savings of over £8 billion by 2010-11. The Department described its approach to delivering these savings in its “Value for Money Delivery Agreement”, published in December 2007, and will report publicly on progress, including in its autumn performance report.

Nutrition

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) pursuant to the answer of 26 June 2008, Official Report, columns 519-22W, on NHS: Personal Records, how many nutrition-related adverse incidents were recorded in each month between January 2005 and December 2007 in each primary care trust area; (224245)

(2) pursuant to the answer of 3 June 2008, Official Report, column 911W, on NHS: Personal Records, if he will place in the Library a copy of each of the reports of nutrition-related adverse incidents made in the last 30-day period for which such reports are available.

Information about nutrition-related adverse incidents in each primary care trust area is not held by the Department. The National Patient Safety Agency's National Reporting and Learning System does not capture the primary care trust area of residence of the patient involved in an adverse incident. The strategic health authority (SHA) analysis, provided in the reply to the earlier question, is based on the SHA that each NHS trust is aligned to, but those catchment areas do not map readily to primary care trust boundaries.

Reports of nutrition-related adverse incidents are not held centrally.

Slaughterhouses

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many abattoirs there were in England in each of the last 20 years, broken down by (a) county and (b) size. (224217)

The information requested is in the following tables.

Table 1: Number of abattoirs in England 1996—2008 by county

County

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Avon

4

4

4

4

4

4

3

2

2

2

2

2

Bedfordshire

4

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

Berkshire

2

2

3

2

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

Buckinghamshire

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

Cambridgeshire

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

Cheshire

17

17

17

17

16

16

15

15

13

13

13

12

Cleveland

8

8

9

8

6

6

4

4

4

4

4

4

Cornwall

14

13

14

14

13

13

13

13

12

13

13

11

County Durham

7

6

6

6

3

3

3

3

3

2

2

2

Cumbria

11

11

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

9

10

11

Derbyshire

23

23

24

23

20

19

13

13

13

13

13

12

Devon

20

20

22

19

19

19

17

19

18

19

18

16

Dorset

7

7

6

5

5

5

5

5

6

5

5

5

Durham

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

East Sussex

5

5

4

4

3

3

3

2

2

2

1

1

East Yorkshire

4

4

4

3

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Essex

14

15

16

16

15

16

13

12

12

12

12

12

Gloucestershire

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

6

6

6

6

6

Greater London

4

4

4

4

2

2

2

3

3

2

2

2

Greater Manchester

15

15

15

14

13

11

10

11

10

10

9

10

Hampshire

6

6

6

5

5

4

3

2

2

1

2

2

Herefordshire

8

8

10

9

6

4

4

4

4

4

3

3

Hertfordshire

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

Humberside

7

7

7

5

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

Kent

7

7

7

7

7

8

7

7

7

7

7

7

Lancashire

24

24

24

22

19

20

18

18

15

15

14

13

Leicestershire

15

16

15

14

13

13

13

13

13

13

13

10

Lincolnshire

25

25

24

23

21

20

21

21

20

19

18

16

Merseyside

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

Norfolk

25

24

26

23

23

21

19

18

19

18

14

14

North Somerset

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

North Yorkshire

27

27

26

27

21

18

19

20

18

17

15

15

Northamptonshire

8

8

7

7

6

5

4

4

3

3

2

2

Northumberland

1

1

1

1

1

1 .

1

1

1

0

0

0

Nottinghamshire

8

7

7

7

8

7

6

6

5

5

4

4

Oxfordshire

5

5

3

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Shropshire

7

8

6

6

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

Somerset

13

15

14

14

14

14

14

13

13

12

11

10

South Yorkshire

8

8

8

8

6

7

6

7

7

6

6

7

Staffordshire

29

28

27

25

26

23

23

23

21

21

18

17

Suffolk

17

16

16

16

15

16

14

13

13

12

12

13

Surrey

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Tyne and Wear

5

5

5

5

4

4

5

5

5

5

3

3

Warwickshire

5

5

5

5

5

5

6

6

6

5

5

4

West Midlands

22

22

23

23

22

21

16

17

17

15

15

16

West Sussex

3

3

3

2

2

1

0

1

2

2

2

1

West Yorkshire

26

27

22

20

18

18

18

17

18

17

15

15

Wiltshire

6

6

5

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

Worcestershire

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Total

492

492

482

455

417

403

375

374

363

349

329

318

Table 2: Number of abattoirs in England 1996—2008 by size

Live stock units per week

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Small

1 to 99 L.U.s

173

182

176

166

135

138

119

126

117

110

102

92

Medium

100 to 999 L.U.s

124

110

111

95

99

92

88

85

87

87

84

86

Large

1,000 to 2499 L.U.s

59

60

51

57

47

55

45

48

48

46

50

48

Very large

More than 2,500 L.U.s

136

140

144

137

136

118

123

115

111

106

93

92

Total

492

492

482

455

417

403

375

374

363

349

329

318

Notes:

1. The Meat Hygiene Service only holds data from 1996.

2.One livestock unit equals:

One bovine

Seven pigs

20 sheep (over 18 kg)

450 poultry (less than 2 kg)

Warwickshire Primary Care Trust

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much was spent by Warwickshire Primary Care Trust on (a) district nurses and (b) management costs in 2007-08. (223421)

Information on management cost data will be available from the 2007-08 audited accounts. However, this information will not be available until later in the autumn. Information on district nursing spending is not held centrally.

Worthing and Southlands Hospital Trust

To ask the Secretary of State for Health in relation to the NHS IT system Cerner release zero introduced to the Worthing and Southlands Hospital Trust, what benefits were expected as a result of the introduction of the system; who initiated its introduction; whether the expected benefits have been realised; what estimate he has made of the cost of the introduction; who is responsible for negotiating with contractors for the support and upgrading of the system; and if he will make a statement. (224272)

Cerner was selected as a subcontractor for the provision of secondary care systems across the South of England by the then national programme for information technology (NPfIT) local service provider (LSP), Fujitsu. Contracts with LSPs under NPfIT are held and negotiated by NHS Connecting for Health on behalf of the Secretary of State.

The R0 version was the first software release in a programme of continuing releases, in accordance with the aims of the NPfTT. R0 is therefore the first step towards a clinically rich, integrated system whose benefits will include, over time, a patient administration system with integration with other systems and sophisticated reporting; order communications and diagnostics reporting, including all pathology and radiology tests and tests ordered in primary care; and scheduling for beds, tests and theatres.

The Cerner product was introduced as part of the normal system deployment process managed by a joint team from Fujitsu and the strategic health authorities with the support of NHS Connecting for Health.

The cost to Fujitsu of local deployments is covered within the overall LSP contract value. Information on any separate local costs incurred by Worthing and Southlands Hospital Trust arising from the deployment is not held centrally. This is normally part of the local financial planning process and the benefits are identified in the business case, although it is not expected that the full benefits will be realised until subsequent releases have been implemented.

Responsibility for system support and software upgrading over the lifetime of the system lies with the LSP, and the cost is provided for in the LSP contract. Any additional or bespoke services requested by the trust are a matter between the trust and the LSP.

Work and Pensions

Children: Maintenance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions for how many cases the Child Support Agency has paid HM Revenue and Customs for referrals and income disclosure in each year since 1993; and if he will make a statement. (214916)

The administration of the Child Support Agency is the matter for the Chief Executive. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Stephen Geraghty, dated 17 September 2008:

In reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about the Child Support Agency, the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Chief Executive.

You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, for how many cases the Child Support Agency has paid HM Revenue and Customs for referrals and income disclosure in each year since 1993; and if he will make a statement. [214916]

Under the Service Level Agreement between the Child Support Agency and Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC), the Agency makes referrals to HMRC for non resident parent trace and earnings information. An agreed charge against the Agency is made for each referral to cover HMRC expenditure.

Such information as is available is set out in the attached table, which shows separately the number of requests dealt with by HMRC where the Agency has made a request for information on the non-resident parent's income, and those made to trace the non-resident parent.

Neither the Agency nor HMRC hold any details of referrals prior to 2002. Data is not available in either organisation concerning trace enquiries prior to 2005.

Financial year

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-091

Earning enquiries

18,681

24,108

26,936

26,917

36,657

40,599

4,503

Trace enquiries

2

2

2

142,474

166,695

212,489

61,328

Total

18,681

24,108

26,936

169,391

203,352

253,088

65,831

1 To date.

2 Not available.

I hope you find this answer helpful.

Departmental Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will place in the Library a copy of a list of non-executive directors employed by his Department, including the business units or areas of expertise for which they provide oversight and brief biographical information for each individual. (219499)

Departmental Public Participation

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what (a) listening exercises and (b) public forums his Department has held in each of the last two years; what the (i) purpose and (ii) cost was in each case; and who the private contractor was and how much it was paid in each case. (221341)

In the last two financial years, the DWP has conducted a number of public forums or listening exercises targeted specifically at the general public. Event management services were provided by private contractors for some of these. The information that is available is set out in the following table. Amounts paid to the external contractors in each case could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

As well as the public forums or listening exercises listed, DWP has engaged with a wide range of the public through online consultation and correspondence, and with stakeholder organisations.

Date

Event purpose

Venue

Contractor

10 January 2007

Raise awareness of the work of Equality 2025 and encourage disabled people to apply for the Northern Ireland representative's post.

Belfast City Council

Not applicable

27 March 2007

Indicators of equality consultation—How will we know we are making progress?

Edinburgh

n/a

30 March 2007

Indicators of equality consultation—How will we know we are making progress?

London

n/a

4 April 2007

Indicators of equality consultation—How will we know we are making progress?

Manchester

n/a

10 May 2007

Consultation workshop—Independent Living Review

Novotel, Bristol

Offshoot

15 May 2007

Consultation workshop—Independent Living Review

NEC, Birmingham

Offshoot

22 May 2007

Consultation workshop—Independent Living Review

Novotel, London

Offshoot

8 June 2007

Consultation workshop—Independent Living Review

NEC, Manchester

Offshoot

Fuel Direct Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) how many times the Fuel Direct option has been used by benefit recipients to pay their utility bills in each year since it was established; and if he will make a statement; [216066]

(2) how many benefit recipients have used the Fuel Direct option to pay their utility bills in each quarter since it was established; and if he will make a statement.

The Fuel Direct scheme has been in existence for over 30 years. Historical information is not available prior to 1994. The available information for the number of income support, pension credit and jobseeker’s allowance claimants with deductions being made for gas and/or electricity is in the following table.

Quarter ending

Number of claimants with deductions for gas and electricity

February 1994

301,700

May 1994

306,700

August 1994

305,200

November 1994

294,500

February 1995

287,000

May 1995

286,200

August 1995

280,300

November 1995

266,300

February 1996

251,600

May 1996

239,700

August 1996

227,800

November 1996

206,600

February 1997

203,400

May 1997

186,700

August 1997

170,500

November 1997

154,500

February 1998

143,200

May 1998

132,700

August 1998

122,200

November 1998

107,900

February 1999

98,800

May 1999

93,200

August 1999

86,500

November 1999

79,700

February 2000

75,600

May 2000

73,400

August 2000

72,500

November 2000

67,500

February 2001

65,400

May 2001

64,200

August 2001

62,500

November 2001

59,200

February 2002

57,000

May 2002

56,100

August 2002

55,000

November 2002

52,800

February 2003

51,200

May 2003

51,100

August 2003

51,600

November 2003

49,400

February 2004

47,300

May 2004

47,800

August 2004

48,400

November 2004

48,200

February 2005

48,000

May 2005

49,900

August 2005

52,300

November 2005

51,600

February 2006

52,400

May 2006

52,600

August 2006

53,500

November 2006

53,400

February 2007

54,300

May 2007

55,300

August 2007

54,900

Notes:

1. Case loads are uprated to WPLS totals and rounded to the nearest 100.

2. Pension credit replaced IS MIG on 6 October 2003.

3. JSA data available from November 1996.

Source:

DWP Information Directorate 5 per cent. sample

Jobseeker’s Allowance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many new applications for jobseeker’s allowance there were in each region in each month since January 2005; and if he will make a statement. (214965)

National Insurance: Immigrants

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 15 July 2008, Official Report, column 325W, on National Insurance: Immigrants, how many of the 3,275 cases in which the names or national insurance numbers (NINOs) given to the Security Industry Authority appeared to be false were cases in which a NINO was issued after the introduction of the right to work test in July 2006; how many of the 3,275 cased involved (a) a false name and (b) a false NINO; and what steps have been taken to prevent the issuing of NINOs on the basis of a false name since July 2006. (221208)

[holding answer 22 July 2008]: None of the national insurance numbers provided to the SIA had been issued by the Department for Work and Pensions to the 3,275 individuals concerned. In 1,873 cases the NINO provided did exist on the Department’s Customer Information System (CIS) but was registered to a different name. In 1,402 cases the number did not exist on CIS at all. Where a potential criminal offence has been committed, details have been passed to the Department for Work and Pensions Fraud Investigation Service for investigation and, where appropriate, prosecution.

It remains the legal responsibility of the employer to check that all their employees have the right to work in the United Kingdom. Employers have clear guidance on the documents they can accept as evidence of the right to work, and this does not include SIA licences or, in the absence of other specified documents, a national insurance number.

Since 2001, the Department for Work and Pensions has had in place rigorous identity checking and verification procedures for all national insurance number applicants. In 2007-08, 759 applications were refused owing to suspect documentation and led to 181 successful prosecutions. Over the same period, a further 5,114 refusals were made on the basis of the applicant’s failing to provide sufficient evidence of identity.

New Deal for Long-Term Unemployed

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many and what proportion of New Deal participants went into the 25 plus categories (a) employment, (b) employment and benefits, (c) benefits—jobseeker’s allowance, (d) benefits—income support, (e) benefits—incapacity benefit, (f) benefits—income support and incapacity benefit, (g) benefits—other/unknown benefits, (h) other known destination and (i) off benefits unknown destination within (i) two weeks, (ii) three months, (iii) six months and (iv) one year of leaving the programme in each year since 1997, broken down by Jobcentre Plus district. (205475)

New deal has been a success helping nearly 2 million people in to work. However, the characteristics of job seekers and the labour market have changed since the introduction of the new deal 10 years ago. That is why we are introducing a new flexible new deal which will offer a personalised approach to its customers. It will tailor the support available to them to their particular needs and to that of the local labour market enabling them to increase their chances of gaining not only employment but sustainable employment in which they can progress.

The information has been placed in the Library.

New Deal for Young People

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many and what proportion of New Deal for Young People participants went into the categories (a) employment, (b) employment and benefits, (c) benefits—jobseeker's allowance, (d) benefits—income support, (e) benefits—incapacity benefit, (f) benefits—income support and incapacity benefit, (g) benefits—other/unknown benefits, (h) other known destination and (i) off benefits unknown destination within (i) two weeks, (ii) three months, (iii) six months and (iv) one year of leaving the programme in each year since 1997, broken down by Jobcentre Plus district. (205474)

New deal has been a success helping nearly two million people in to work. However, the characteristics of job seekers and the labour market have changed since the introduction of the new deal 10 years ago. That is why we are introducing a new flexible new deal which will offer a personalised approach to its customers. It will tailor the support available to them to their particular needs and to that of the local labour market enabling them to increase their chances of gaining not only employment but sustainable employment in which they can progress.

The information has been placed in the Library.

New Deal Schemes

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) how many and what proportion of (a) New Deal for Young People leavers, (b) New Deal for 25 plus leavers and (c) leavers of all New Deals moved into sustained employment in each year since 1997, broken down by Jobcentre Plus district; (205472)

(2) how many and what proportion of leavers of all his Department's employment programmes moved into sustained employment in each year since 1997, broken down by Jobcentre Plus district.

New deal has been a success helping nearly 2 million people in to work. However, the characteristics of job seekers and the labour market have changed since the introduction of the new deal 10 years ago. That is why we are introducing a new flexible new deal which will offer a personalised approach to its customers. It will tailor the support available to them to their particular needs and to that of the local labour market enabling them to increase their chances of gaining not only employment but sustainable employment in which they can progress.

The information requested on all new deals and all employment programmes is not available.

The information on new deal for young people and new deal 25 plus has been placed in the Library.

Occupational Health: Waste Management

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will place in the Library a copy of the research report WR0217—Assessment of Occupational Health and Safety Risks of Waste Collection and Handling Systems, commissioned by the Health and Safety Executive. (219074)

This research report,

“Collecting, transfer, treatment and processing household waste and recyclables. Assessment of the occupational health and safety risks of systems to provide HSE, local authorities, waste/recycling companies and others with data that will assist in the selection of the most appropriate system whilst meeting environmental targets”

was published in January 2008 and is available via the Health and Safety Executives website:

www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/rr609.htm

where it is accompanied by an electronic database. A copy of the report has been forwarded to the House of Commons Library.

Pension Credit

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much was spent by his Department on backdated annual payments of pension credit (a) in total and (b) broken down by the smallest geographical area for which figures are available in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. (219212)

Precise information on the time customers take to claim pension credit (known as backdating) is not routinely collected, nor therefore is expenditure on backdating. Expenditure on backdating has been estimated using information on average awards and backdating periods. Backdating periods have been estimated by comparing information on the date entitlement starts and the date pension credit is put into payment. In some cases where payment starts after entitlement the delay will be due to processing times, evidence gathering and verification work which routinely accompanies claims for pension credit. In 2006-07 around 60 per cent. of all successful new claims were backdated for three months or less (this includes cases with zero backdating). The information that is available is in the following table.

Expenditure on pension credit backdating, by Government Office region (£ million)

2003-04 (October-March)

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

Total

80

330

190

150

North East

1

10

10

10

North West

10

40

20

20

Yorkshire and the Humber

10

30

20

10

East Midlands

10

30

10

10

West Midlands

10

30

20

10

East of England

10

30

20

10

London

10

40

30

20

South East

10

40

20

20

South West

10

30

20

10

Wales

1

20

10

10

Scotland

10

30

20

10

1 Estimates of less than £5 million.

Notes:

1. Care should be taken when interpreting the table. The Department does not routinely collect information on expenditure on backdated payments and it has been estimated using information on average awards and backdating periods. Backdating periods have been estimated by comparing information on the date entitlement starts and the date pension credit is put into payment. Estimated backdating periods therefore include unknown periods of time that are due to processing, evidence gathering and verification work which routinely accompany every claim for pension credit.

2. All figures are consistent with the 2008 Budget report.

3. Pension credit was introduced in October 2003, so expenditure figures are only available from this date.

4. Estimates of the expenditure on backdating have been rounded to the nearest £10 million.. Estimates at the local authority level are not sufficiently robust for publication.

5. Estimates for regions may not sum to totals due to rounding. The total also includes a small amount of expenditure where the region is not known.

Source:

Experimental statistics of pension credit on flows and DWP accounting systems

Pensioners: Personal Income

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the average income of the (a) top and (b) bottom quartile of (i) pensioners and (ii) pensioners over the age of 80 in each region was in each year since 1997. (205491)

Information for those over the age of 80 is not available due to small sample sizes.

The information for all pensioners is shown in the following tables. Figures are based on survey data and as such are subject to a degree of sampling and non-sampling error. Figures are based on the average of three years' data as single-year estimates do not provide a robust guide to year-on-year changes. Users should not read too much into small differences between regions or between three-year averages, particularly for the top quartile, where estimates may be influenced by extreme values.

Average gross income of all pensioners in the top quartile of the income distribution of pensioner units in Great Britain by region

£ per week (2006-07 prices)

1997-98 to 1999-2000

1998-99 to 2000-01

1999-2000 to 2001-02

2000-01 to 2002-03

2001-02 to 2003-04

2002-03 to 2004-05

2003-04 to 2005-06

2004-05 to 2006-07

North East

528

537

551

587

631

691

713

754

North West and Merseyside

585

614

586

605

653

702

742

727

Yorkshire and the Humber

635

652

683

697

737

703

712

691

East Midlands

550

563

583

619

654

689

695

737

West Midlands

605

618

626

632

629

663

704

713

East of England

655

662

667

700

711

728

720

741

London

711

795

855

820

796

770

828

901

South East

652

677

741

787

830

835

851

839

South West

576

630

643

668

654

712

747

774

Wales

521

522

551

588

653

662

680

675

Scotland

583

605

611

622

621

668

684

727

England

625

657

682

702

721

739

765

778

Great Britain

616

646

669

690

709

729

754

769

Average gross income of all pensioners in the bottom quartile of the income distribution of pensioner units in Great Britain by region

£ per week (2006-07 prices)

1997-98 to 1999-2000

1998-99 to 2000-01

1999-2000 to 2001-02

2000-01 to 2002-03

2001-02 to 2003-04

2002-03 to 2004-05

2003-04 to 2005-06

2004-05 to 2006-07

North East

118

125

131

137

142

144

148

147

North West

114

118

124

129

133

138

142

143

Yorkshire and the Humber

119

124

128

133

138

142

143

144

East Midlands

114

117

122

127

133

137

140

141

West Midlands

114

119

124

128

132

135

140

141

East of England

113

117

122

126

130

135

138

139

London

108

110

115

120

123

127

128

131

South East

111

117

120

124

129

135

138

138

South West

112

116

123

126

131

135

137

138

Wales

112

117

123

129

134

138

141

142

Scotland

118

122

128

134

139

144

146

147

England

114

118

123

127

131

136

139

140

Great Britain

114

118

123

128

132

137

140

141

Notes:

1. Gross income is income from all sources received by the pensioner unit including income from social security benefits, earnings from employment, any private pension, and tax credits.

2. Figures show average income for pensioner units in each region within relevant quartile of the income distribution for Great Britain.

3. Based on survey data and as such subject to a degree of sampling and non sampling error. Figures are based on the average of three years' data as single year estimates do not provide a robust guide to year-on-year changes. Estimates for the highest quartile may be influenced by extreme values. Users should not read too much into small differences between regions.

4. Great Britain figures are included on the same basis for comparison: further information for single years at a national level are available in the publication “Pensioners' Income Series 2006-07”.

5. Figures have been rounded to the nearest £.

6. Pensioner units are either pensioner couples or single pensioners.

7. Pensioner couples are couples where one or more of the adults are state pension age or over.

Source:

Pensioners' Income Series 2006-07

Personal Accounts Delivery Authority: Consultants

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many consultants are employed by the Personal Accounts Delivery Authority; and how much the authority has spent on them. (205495)

Setting up a pension scheme of the size and nature of the personal accounts scheme is a complex task and requires specialist skills. The Personal Accounts Delivery Authority needs to access a range of skills to support the development of the scheme, including skills most appropriately and efficiently provided through consultancy contracts.

The Delivery Authority took responsibility for accounting for its own expenditure from 1 March 2008.

The number of consultants employed by the Delivery Authority has varied over time in response to changing needs. During the period 1 March 2008 to 31 August 2008, PADA has engaged 21 consultants a month on average. These were recruited after a competitive tender exercise and in line with Office of Government Commerce procedures and best practice to secure value for money.

The amount spent on consultants for work for the Delivery Authority from 1 March 2008 to 31 August 2008 is estimated to be around £4.6 million.

From 1 August 2007 to 28 February 2008, the costs of the Delivery Authority were met directly from departmental budgets. The cost of consultancy in this period is estimated to be around £5.9 million.

Sight Impairment: Disability Living Allowance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of the cost of awarding disability living allowance for severe sight impairment at the higher band to all those with severe sight impairment who claim the benefit. (223551)

The cost of extending entitlement to the higher rate mobility component of disability living allowance to all people with severe sight impairments depends greatly on the precise definition used. One estimate made is that such a change would cost about £45 million in 2010-11, the earliest date at which such a change could be made.

Women and Equality

Departmental ICT

To ask the Minister for Women and Equality what IT contracts the Government Equalities Office has entered into since its inception. (215139)

Since its establishment on 12 October 2007, the Government Equalities Office has been based within premises, which house the Department of Communities and Local Government (CLG). As a result, the GEO has a rental agreement with CLG which allows it to use their IT systems. Aside from this, the GEO has not entered into any IT contracts since its inception.

Equality

To ask the Minister for Women and Equality what discussions she has had with (a) Cabinet and (b) other ministerial colleagues on (i) departmental, (ii) sectoral and (iii) national strategies on age discrimination in the provision of goods and services and the promotion of age equality; and if she will make a statement. (210466)

During the development of proposals for the new Equality Bill I had discussions with Government colleagues at all levels in a number of key departments including the Department of Health, Department of Work and Pensions and the Treasury to discuss, amongst other things, our proposals to take a power in the Equality Bill to prohibit age discrimination in the provisions of goods, facilities and services and the exercise of public functions and to introduce a single public sector equality duty extended to cover age. Our proposals for the Bill were set out in the Government's response to the Discrimination Law Review consultation, which was published on July 21 this year.

Gender Discrimination

To ask the Minister for Women and Equality what steps the Government have taken to act upon the recommendations of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women since the 41st session of parties of 30 June to 18 July. (224211)

Rape: Victim Support Schemes

To ask the Minister for Women and Equality what proportion of the £1 million emergency fund for rape crisis centres, announced in March, has been distributed; which organisations have received such funding; how much each organisation have received; and what plans the Government has to maintain the funding for the year starting April 2009. (224210)

Treasury

Departmental Data Protection

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many data security breaches have been reported in his Department and its agencies in the last three months. (224259)

Departmental Domestic Visits

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer which parliamentary constituencies his predecessor visited between (a) 8 June 2000 and 8 June 2001, (b) 8 June 2001 and 8 June 2002, (c) 8 June 2002 and 8 June 2003, (d) 8 June 2003 and 8 June 2004 and (e) 8 June 2004 and 6 May 2005; on what date each such visit occurred; and what the purpose of each such visit was. (224003)

The information requested could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. Government Ministers regularly visit all parts of the country as part of the policy development process.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) how many times his predecessor visited (a) Cardiff, (b) Edinburgh, (c) Swansea, (d) Glasgow, (e) Aberdeen and (f) Dundee between 6 May 2005 and 6 May 2006; on what dates such visits occurred; and what the purpose of each visit was; (224024)

(2) how many times his predecessor visited (a) London, (b) Birmingham, (c) Manchester, (d) Newcastle, (e) Leeds, (f) Sheffield, (g) Liverpool and (h) Bristol between (i) 8 June 2001 and 6 May 2002, (ii) 6 May 2002 and 6 May 2003, (iii) 6 May 2003 and 6 May 2004 and (iv) 6 May 2004 and 6 May 2005; on what dates such visits occurred; and what the purpose of each visit was.

The information requested could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. Government Ministers regularly visit all parts of the country as part of the policy development process.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) how many times his predecessor visited (a) London, (b) Birmingham, (c) Manchester, (d) Newcastle, (e) Leeds, (f) Sheffield, (g) Liverpool and (h) Bristol between 6 May 2006 and 27 June 2007; on what dates such visits took place; and what the purpose of each such visit was; (224236)

(2) how many times his predecessor visited (a) London, (b) Birmingham, (c) Manchester, (d) Newcastle, (e) Leeds, (f) Sheffield, (g) Liverpool and (h) Bristol between 6 May 2005 and 6 May 2006; on what dates such visits took place; and what the purpose of each such visit was;

(3) how many times his predecessor visited (a) Cardiff, (b) Edinburgh, (c) Swansea, (d) Glasgow, (e) Aberdeen and (f) Dundee between 6 May 2006 and 27 June 2007; on what dates such visits occurred; and what the purpose of each such visit was.

The information requested could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. Government Ministers regularly visit all parts of the country as part of the policy development process.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) which parliamentary constituencies his predecessor visited between 8 June 1999 and 8 June 2000; on what date each such visit took place; and what the purpose of each such visit was; (224247)

(2) which parliamentary constituencies his predecessor visited between 2 May 1997 and 8 June 1998; on what dates each such visit took place; and what the purpose of each visit was;

(3) which parliamentary constituencies his predecessor visited between 8 June 1998 and 8 June 1999; on what dates each such visit took place; and what the purpose of each visit was.

The information requested could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. Government Ministers regularly visit all parts of the country as part of the policy development process.

Members: Correspondence

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he will reply to the letters of (a) 23 July 2008 with regard to Mr I Laing and (b) 28 July 2008, transferred to him from the Home Office, with regard to Mr Sehir Hussain from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton. (224120)

The Treasury could find no record of either correspondence being received and the right hon. Member’s office has been informed.

Pensions

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what plans he has to allow the transfer of property and any respective debt secured on it from one provider to another as part of the self-invested pension plan where there are no tax implications; (224113)

(2) what plans he has to allow the switching of a pension scheme's assets and debt to a new self-invested pension plan or small self-administered scheme without having to requalify under the borrowing rules providing the condition that the property is not sold is met; and what assessment he has made of the extent to which such switching meets the aim of simplification of the process according to Government objectives;

(3) what plans he has to relax the borrowing rules for pensions under self-invested pension plans and small self-administered schemes for smaller pension funds allowing the fund owner to own property as part of that scheme providing that an element of debt is included also permitting property transactions which may be for residential property as part of those schemes.

A self-invested or small self-administered pension scheme can transfer assets and associated borrowing to another such scheme provided these are within the limits on scheme borrowing. These limits allow borrowing of up to 50 per cent. of the value of the sums and assets held for the purposes of the member's arrangement under the scheme. This provides a prudent limit on such borrowings.

The Government support the ability to choose a diverse range of assets, including commercial property to support pension saving in registered pension schemes. It also remains open to all schemes to invest indirectly in residential property so long as this is carried out through a genuinely diverse commercial vehicle.

Prime Minister

Cabinet: Meetings

To ask the Prime Minister on what occasions the Cabinet has met at times other than its regular meeting times since June 2007; which Cabinet Ministers did not attend the Cabinet meeting held in Birmingham in September 2008; when the media were first informed that the Cabinet would meet in Birmingham; and what costs arose from holding the meeting in Birmingham. (224271)

To ask the Prime Minister what (a) security, (b) administration and (c) other costs were incurred as a result of holding the meeting of the Cabinet in Birmingham on 8 September 2008. (224266)

Cabinet is usually held on Tuesday mornings. My spokesman announced on 4 August that Cabinet alongside a series of visits and a public engagement events would be held outside London

(http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page16444).

All Cabinet Ministers and Ministers attending Cabinet were present. The costs will be published shortly.

Departmental Domestic Visits

To ask the Prime Minister (1) how many official visits he has made to (a) Cardiff, (b) Edinburgh, (c) Swansea, (d) Glasgow, (e) Aberdeen and (f) Dundee since 27 June 2007; on what dates such visits occurred; and what the purpose of each such visit was; (224235)

(2) how many official visits he has made to (a) London, (b) Birmingham, (c) Manchester, (d) Newcastle, (e) Leeds, (f) Sheffield, (g) Liverpool and (h) Bristol since 27 June 2007; on what dates such visits occurred; and what the purpose was of each such visit.

I refer the hon. Member to the written statement I made on Tuesday 22 July 2008, Official Report, column 103-04WS.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Agriculture: Subsidies

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has had made of the effects of his Department’s budget overspend in (a) 2006-07 and (b) 2007-08 on (i) cashflow for payments under the Single Payment Scheme and (ii) delivery of other frontline services. (223394)

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: In 2006-07, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs exceeded its capital budget by a net £17.4 million. This amount was subsequently deducted from the 2007-08 capital budget. Through normal in-year financial management, the Department was able to live within its revised budget, including coping with the emergency costs of floods and animal disease outbreaks. The Department protected ministerial priorities and avoided any additional burden on taxpayers over the two years.

Payments under the Single Payment Scheme are funded in full from the European Union, so are not affected by budget changes. Delivery of frontline services in 2007-08 was not affected as their budgets had already been set by the time the capital budget reduction was known, and those frontline services budgets were not subsequently reduced.

Bovine Tuberculosis: Disease Control

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the evidential basis is for the statement in his Department’s 2008 annual report that the Government is on course to meet the 2008 target for limiting the spread of bovine tuberculosis. (223339)

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: DEFRA’s statement that we are on course to achieve

“a reduction in the spread of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) to new parishes to below the incremental trend of 17.5 confirmed new incidents per annum by the end of 2008”

was based on the latest statistics available at the time the report was written.

Our statistics show that in the 12 months up to September 2007, there were 236 confirmed new incidents of bTB in ‘new’ parishes i.e. those parishes where there had been no confirmed new bTB incidents during the previous four calendar years. The five-year average (mean) from October 2002 to September 2007 was 298.8 CNIs per year in new parishes compared to the previous five-year average (October 2001 to September 2006) of 316.6. So the PSA9 indicator at the end of September 2007 was 17.8 CNIs per annum. Bovine TB is cyclical in nature, with variations occurring both seasonally and over longer time scales, so care should be taken not to read too much into such short to medium-term changes. However, taking variations into account, we would expect the projected PSA9 indicator for the end of 2008 to be below the target of +17.5 CNIs per annum.

Departmental Overtime

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the cost of overtime payments paid to staff in his Department was in each of the last 12 months, broken down by pay grade. (221295)

The following table shows the amount of overtime paid to staff in each of the last 12 months, broken down by pay grade. The data covers staff in core-DEFRA and agencies covered by core-DEFRA pay arrangements (i.e. Animal Health, Marine and Fisheries Agency, Veterinary Medicines Directorate, Government Decontamination Service and Pesticides Safety Directorate (which merged with the Health and Safety Executive on 1 April 2008)).

£

AA

AO

EO

HEO

FS

SEO

VO

G7

G6

2007

September

45,128

103,573

227,827

162,620

5,427

47,375

234,541

52,512

67,995

October

47,570

92,356

202,807

142,397

3,786

43,473

224,251

50,592

102,909

November

39,975

82,806

279,805

157,360

465

19,663

263,798

44,063

62,712

December

23,027

57,901

177,452

106,901

8,084

39,170

137,779

62,428

38,348

January 08

30,055

21,767

38,166

41,431

2,366

35,647

30,000

21,365

33,889

2008

February

20,294

32,173

56,892

49,677

1,250

20,803

30,492

20,856

12,059

March

13,209

15,041

41,023

22,787

4,122

13,954

20,831

8,900

7,169

April

9,077

27,777

48,834

43,450

1,434

23,449

27,817

28,913

19,328

May

5,684

18,175

36,104

38,070

3,788

16,357

16,170

34,667

5,662

June

6,176

21,778

35,897

37,055

823

8,167

25,549

14,424

8,370

July

8,052

38,349

74,013

62,590

2,282

30,782

56,146

31,061

16,520

August

8,585

18,053

39,508

32,148

1,533

17,367

27,124

33,914

10,879

Note:

Grade equivalents:

AA—Administration Assistant

AO—Administration Officer

EO—Executive Officer

HEO—Higher Executive Officer

FS—Fast Stream

SEO—Senior Executive Officer

VO—Veterinary Officer

G7—Grade 7

G6—Grade 6

Departmental Public Participation

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer to the right hon. Member for Maidenhead of 12 May 2008, Official Report, columns 1327-28W, on departmental public participation, if he will place in the Library copies of the (a) Navigator research study on Waste Infrastructure, (b) Scott Wilson research study on Public Understanding of Sustainable Transport and (c) Social Research and Consultancy study on Consumer attitudes to waste efficiency. (219039)

I am arranging for copies of the Scott Wilson research study on Public Understanding of Sustainable Transport and the Social Research and Consultancy study on Consumer attitudes to water efficiency to be placed in the Library of the House. The Navigator Waste Infrastructure Research study has not yet been completed.

Departmental Sick Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many staff in (a) his Department, (b) its agencies and (c) the non-departmental bodies for which it has responsibility have received sick pay for sick leave due to (i) stress and (ii) mental health and behavioural disorders in each of the last 10 years; what the average length of time was for which sick pay was paid in these cases; and if he will make a statement. (216156)

Tables showing the total number of staff who have received sick pay for sickness absence due to (i) stress and (ii) mental and behavioural disorders and the average length of time for which sick pay was paid in these cases, for the last four financial years is given as follows. Data prior to April 2004 is available only at disproportionate cost.

Stress

Financial year

Total number of staff

Average length of time sick pay paid (days)

1 April 2007—31 March 2008

133

25.1

1 April 2006—31 March 2007

167

25.8

1 April 2005—31 March 2006

200

22.5

1 April 2004—31 March 2005

101

32.7

Mental health and behavioural disorders

Financial year

Total number of staff

Average length of time sick pay paid

1 April 2007—31 March 2008

130

30

1 April 2006—31 March 2007

174

28.2

1 April 2005—31 March 2006

208

29.3

1 April 2004—31 March 2005

93

36.1

The data cover all staff in core-DEFRA and executive agencies covered by the core-Department’s terms and conditions (i.e. Animal Health, Marine and Fisheries Agency, Veterinary Medicines Directorate, Government Decontamination Service and Pesticides Safety Directorate (which merged with the Health and Safety Executive on 1 April 2008)).

The data do not cover executive agencies or non-departmental public bodies which operate delegated pay arrangements, as this information could be provided, only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much was paid in sick pay to staff in (a) his Department, (b) its agencies and (c) the non-departmental bodies for which it has responsibility in each of the last five years; what proportion of the staffing expenditure of each body this represented in each year; and if he will make a statement. (216157)

A table showing the total cost of sick pay for staff in DEFRA for the last four financial years is as follows. Data prior to April 2004 are available only at disproportionate cost.

Financial Year (1 April to 31 March each year)

Total cost of sick pay (£)

Proportion of staffing expenditure (%)

2007-08

3,569,351

1.41

2006-07

4,146,313

1.40

2005-06

4,894,761

1.79

2004-05

3,524,208

1.40

The data cover all staff in Core-DEFRA and those Executive Agencies covered by the core-department's terms and conditions (i.e. Animal Health, Marine and Fisheries Agency, Veterinary Medicines Directorate, Government Decontamination Service and Pesticides Safety Directorate (which merged with the HSE on 1 Apr 08))

Further information on the Department’s other agencies and non-departmental public bodies is available only at disproportionate cost.

Dogs: Animal Welfare

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the effects of the Animal Welfare Act 2006 on the behaviour of breeders of dogs; and what plans he has to reduce the number of young dogs in animal sanctuaries. (223116)

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: Under the Breeding of Dogs Act 1973 and the Breeding and Sale of Dogs (Welfare) Act 1999, anyone who is in the business of breeding and selling dogs requires a licence from their local authority. Under the legislation, local authorities have powers of entry and search and can decide whether a licence should be issued.

In addition, the Animal Welfare Act 2006 provides that any owner or keeper must provide for the welfare needs of their animals (this requirement applies to breeders of dogs). Failure to provide for an animal’s needs can result in a penalty of £5,000 and/or six months’ imprisonment. The 2006 Act, which came into force last year, placed for the first time a statutory responsibility on owners and keepers to provide for the welfare needs of their animals. Anyone considering owning or keeping a dog should ensure that they are familiar with what is required and are prepared to meet the associated costs.

I am satisfied that the existing legislation contains the necessary powers to enable enforcers to deal with any irresponsible dog breeders and owners.

My Department is working with devolved Administrations to produce a code of practice on the keeping of dogs. The code will explain the essential requirements of keeping a dog and will be approved by Parliament. We expect to consult widely on a draft code before the end of the year.

We hope this guidance will enable people to better understand the care that a dog requires and thus to reduce the number of dogs in animal sanctuaries.

Domestic Waste Management

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment the Waste and Resources Action Programme has made of the scope for monthly collections of household residual rubbish. (223619)

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: The Waste and Resources Action Programme has made no such assessment.

Fertilisers: Subsidies

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps his Department is taking to assist farmers in meeting fertiliser costs; and if he will make a statement. (223215)

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: Current high energy prices are having a knock-on effect on the price of manufactured ‘inorganic’ fertilisers. Lord Rooker and my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs have discussed this issue with the Agricultural Industries Confederation, which represents the UK fertiliser sector. We are alert to the potential impact that high fertiliser prices may have on farmers and we will continue to monitor the situation; the fundamental cause is the rise in the price of oil.

Farmers will want to do all they can to ensure efficient fertiliser use. Some farmers will also need to consider increased use of ‘organic’ fertilisers such as manures. Other options include the use of digestate from Anaerobic Digestion.

Pandas

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the policy of the Government is on the loaning of giant pandas to UK zoos for commercial purposes. (224054)

International trade in giant pandas is strictly controlled under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), and trade in them is facilitated by means of an import/export certification system, which is administered by Animal Health.

Before granting a certificate to allow a captive-bred giant panda to be imported into this country, Animal Health would have to be satisfied that a number of strict conditions had first been met. For example, the UK’s CITES Scientific Authority for fauna (the Joint Nature Conservation Committee) must assess whether the export would have a harmful effect on the conservation status of the species. The importer would also need to demonstrate that they had the housing and husbandry skills to conserve and care for the pandas adequately.

If the giant panda was wild-caught, Animal Health would have to be satisfied that the animal would not be used for primarily commercial purposes; it could only be imported for essential biomedical research, or for breeding, research or educational purposes of benefit to the conservation of the species. There is nothing to preclude the issuing of licences to allow the commercial use of captive bred giant pandas. Applications of this nature would be dealt with on a case by case basis.

Plastic Bags

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) on what date a full life-cycle analysis of plastic carrier bags was first commissioned; and on what date it is expected to be published; (224104)

(2) what steps his Department has taken to produce a full life-cycle analysis of plastic carrier bags.

The life cycle analysis of carrier bags is being carried out by the Environment Agency. It was commissioned in January 2006 and is expected to be published at the end of this year.

The Environment Agency is looking at a range of carrier bags, including disposable plastic carrier bags and bio-degradable alternatives. The study is looking at their entire life-cycle from raw material extraction, through manufacture and use, to reuse, recycling and emissions from final disposal.

Waste Disposal

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what tonnage of wet waste was collected from (a) households and (b) businesses in each local authority area in (i) 2006-07 and (ii) 2007-08; (223506)

(2) what tonnage of wet waste was anaerobically digested by local authorities or their contractors in (a) 2006-07 and (b) 2007-08; and what volume of biomethane was produced by these processes in each year.

Waste Disposal: Offenders

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many fixed penalties for waste receptacle-related offences were issued in 2007-08. (223620)

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: All local authorities and any other bodies with fixed penalty notice issuing powers must submit a returns form to the Local Environmental Quality division at DEFRA each year, detailing all the fixed penalty notices issued for relevant offences for that period. Data on the number of fixed penalty notices issued in 2007-08 for ‘waste receptacles offences’ will be published later this year on the DEFRA website.

Waste Disposal: Waste Management

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what records (a) his Department and (b) the Waste and Resources Action Programme holds on which waste collection authorities have adopted collection policies which prohibit side waste. (223618)

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: Neither my Department nor the Waste and Resources Action Programme hold records of which waste collection authorities prohibit side waste.

Waste Management

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what quantity of green list wastes was exported to non-OECD countries in the last five years; and to which companies this waste was exported in the receiving countries. (223448)

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: Where non-hazardous wastes (such as separated recyclables) are exported, they are generally subject only to commercial controls, and not to the prior notification and consent procedures which apply to exports of hazardous wastes. Precise data on the amounts and destinations of exported recyclables are not, therefore, available.

However, by using HM Revenue and Customs trade data it is possible to estimate that 8.4 million tonnes of green list waste was exported from the UK to countries outside the EU (including non-EU OECD countries) in 2006. This data are indicative, since the categories used to collect trade data are not identical to those used to collect data on waste.

Weed Control

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many enforcement notices he has served on landowners under the Weeds Act 1959 in relation to (a) ragwort, (b) spear thistle, (c) creeping field thistle, (d) broad leaved dock and (e) curled dock in each year since 2004. (223592)

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: Separate figures for the number of enforcement notices served for each of the five weeds covered by the Weeds Act 1959 are not available, however the majority of enforcement notices served relate to Common Ragwort (senecio jacobaea). The total number of enforcement notices served is set out in the following table.

Number

2004

122

2005

77

2006

19

2007

52

2008 (to end August)

14

1 This is an approximate figure because the number of enforcement notices served in the period July to December in relation to weeds complaints handled at that time by DEFRA’s Crewe office, are not available.

Note:

All figures relate to England.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what representations he has received in relation to ragwort in the last 12 months. (223593)

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: In the last 12 months, Natural England, the Agency responsible for investigating complaints relating to the Weeds Act 1959, received 330 forms of complaint, mostly about Common Ragwort. DEFRA have also received approximately 190 pieces of general correspondence about ragwort, but we cannot give details of the specific categories of that correspondence.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what consideration he has given to reviewing the regulations and legislation governing ragwort with a view to updating the provisions; and if he will make a statement. (223594)

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: The administrative procedures for investigating complaints about ragwort and the other weeds covered by the Weeds Act 1959 were reviewed and updated in 2004. We have no current plans to review the Weeds Act 1959.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when he plans to next review the code of practice on ragwort. (223595)

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: The “code of practice on how to prevent the spread of Ragwort” was published in July 2004 and we have no immediate plans to review it.

Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform

Carbon Capture: Operating Costs

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what estimate he has made of the (a) capital and (b) operating costs of the winning carbon capture and storage demonstration project proposal. (223505)

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: Given the unique nature of this project it is difficult to provide a definitive assessment of costs. It is also the case that the final cost may vary significantly according to the design of the winning project. We expect to develop a much clearer picture of both capital and operating costs during the competition process as we undertake detailed negotiations with the four pre-qualified Bidders.

Departmental Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how much was claimed in reimbursable expenses by special advisers in his Department in each of the last 10 years. (215225)

Since the formation of the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform on 28 June 2008, reimbursable expenses claimed by the Special Advisers have totalled £2,497.43.

Electricity: Meters

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what progress has been made on reducing the tariffs for electricity on pre-payment meters. (223452)

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: We announced in Budget 2008 that the Secretary of State was prepared, to use his statutory powers with a view to reducing the differential between prepayment and other forms of payment for both gas and electricity.

Ofgem is currently investigating tariff differentials as part of its probe into the energy market. Initial findings are expected shortly.

If Ofgem’s analysis does show that prepayment meter customers are suffering disadvantage then we will in the first instance expect Ofgem and the energy suppliers to provide the solution. If sufficient progress is not made by this winter 2008/09, the Secretary of State is prepared to consult on legislation, with a view to reducing unjustified tariff differentials.

Energy: Conservation

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what estimates his Department has made of the potential reduction in energy consumption by replacing D-rated and below energy circulator pumps with A-rated energy circulator pumps in (a) domestic and (b) non-domestic properties in the UK. (219190)

BERR has not made estimates for reduced energy consumption for these products. We of course welcome efficiency measures to reduce energy consumption and encourage companies to seek guidance on reducing energy use from bodies such as the Carbon Trust. BERR works closely with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs who, as Whitehall policy lead, is considering the energy efficiency of products particularly in relation to the Eco-design of Energy-using Products Directive.

Internet: Scottish Islands

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what recent steps his Department has taken to provide upgrades to internet services to the Scottish Islands; and if he will make a statement. (217158)

The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform has not been directly involved in any recent activity to upgrade internet services in the Scottish Islands.

The Scottish Government, however, announced on 26 June 2008 that it had signed a £3.3 million contract to deliver an affordable broadband service to those eligible households and businesses that registered as being “out of reach” of the technology. Avanti Caledonian Broadband Ltd, the selected supplier, aims to utilise a mix of technologies, including satellite and wireless, to deliver a broadband solution appropriate to the location and density of those that have made themselves known to the Scottish Government.

Iron and Steel: Prices

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what assessment he has made of the effect of recent increases in steel prices on the Government's energy policy; and if he will make a statement. (220161)

[holding answer 21 July 2008]: We have not made an assessment of the effect of recent increases in steel prices on the Government's energy policy. It is for energy companies to decide to what extent they take account of raw materials prices when making decisions on future investments. Strong demand for metals and the consequent rise in the price of steel is a global phenomenon and energy companies in other countries have been similarly affected.

However we are aware that the rising cost of raw materials including steel is one of the factors leading to a significant rise in the cost of wind turbines. Despite this price rise global demand for wind turbines is growing 30 per cent. year on year. The Government remain committed to achieving our contribution to the EU 2020 target and launched a consultation last month which will culminate in the publication of our renewable energy strategy early next year.

Motor Sports: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how much funding his Department has provided for motor sports technological development in each year since 2003. (220499)

Since 2003, BERR has allocated a total of £4 million towards motorsport development as part of its commitment to the work of Motorsport Development UK (MDUK). In addition, the motorsport industry has received £1.4 million from UK Trade and Investment Sectors Group. Expenditure is set out in the following table.

£000

MDUK funding

UKTI Sector Group funding

Total spend in financial year

2003-04

0

0

0

2004-05

573

339

912

2005-06

1,122

395

1,517

2006-07

1,277

358

1,635

2007-08

982

322

1,304

Total

3,954

1,414

5,368

Motor Sports: Fuels

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what recent progress has been made on the Energy Efficient Motor Sport initiative, with particular reference to the development of a fuel-efficient sports car; and if he will make a statement. (218772)

Energy Efficient Motor Sport (EEMS) is an initiative of Motorsport Development UK, a partnership between BERR and four regional development agencies set up to sustain and grow the UK’s world-leading motorsport sector. EEMS has received £1.8 million Government funding.

EEMS is actively involved in a new championship specifically designed to bring efficient sports cars into motorsport. It is working in partnership with enviroSportscar to develop the regulations for the new series that will see high-performance, fuel-efficient sports cars competing in a series of circuit, drag and endurance racing challenges. The new championship was officially launched on 21 July 2008 at the London Motor show. In addition, EEMS is working with one of the highest profile sports car championships in the UK—the British Touring Car Championship (BTCC)—to introduce regulation that will stimulate the more efficient use of fuels.

National Union of Mineworkers

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what meetings (a) he and (b) his Ministers have held with representatives of the National Union of Mineworkers in the last six months; what the date was of each such meeting; and if he will make a statement. (219411)

No bilateral meetings have taken place between Ministers from the Department and the NUM within the last six months. However, I attended a meeting at the TUC on 19 June 2008 and a representative of the NUM was present.

The NUM were also represented at the Coal Health Monitoring Group meeting on 25 June 2008 which I chaired. Also the NUM, BACM and TUC were represented at the Coal Forum which I attended on the 17 July 2008.

Power Stations: Wales

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what correspondence his Department has had with the Welsh Assembly Government on a freedom of information request to the Welsh Assembly Government on communications between his Department and the Welsh Assembly Government over the responsibility for granting permission for the construction of power stations over 50 MW in Wales. (213081)

The Department has corresponded with the Welsh Assembly Government on this Freedom of Information Request request. The Welsh Assembly Government sought the views of BERR on records that fell within the scope of the request. BERR advised that as the information related to the Planning Bill which was currently before Parliament, information on interdepartmental policy discussions should be withheld.

River Severn: Tidal Power

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what assessment he has made of the likely effect on the Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Study of English Heritage's identification of Weston-Super-Mare as a conservation area. (223217)

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: The Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Study, which was launched in January 2007, is currently at its scoping phase. The Historic Environment, which includes assessment of impacts on conservation areas, has been identified as a key topic for investigation under the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) being carried out as part of the overall feasibility study. We will be consulting on the scope of the SEA around the turn of the year.

English Heritage is represented on the SEA Steering Group, which includes members from a wide range of stakeholders.

Telephone Systems

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what estimate he has made of the number of telephone lines delivered through a digital access carrier system in each region of the UK. (214580)

Digital access carrier system equipment is used in a limited number of areas across the country as an acceptable method of delivering two independent telephone services over a single line in areas where there is a shortage of line capacity.

BERR has been informed by BT that there are currently around 400,000 DACS (digital access carrier system) lines in the UK and the vast majority of DACS systems are operated by BT. Following further investment in new network capacity by BT, there has been a reduction of around 20 per cent. in the number of DACS lines on BT's network in the last 12 months. This number is expected to continue to fall in the coming years as BT continues to invest to deliver broadband service. BT does not analyse DACS populations by region.

Zonal Transmission Losses

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (1) what recent discussions his Department has had with Ofgem on the effects of zonal transmission losses on environmentally beneficial projects; and if he will make a statement; (224039)

(2) what recent discussions his Department has had with Ofgem on zonal transmission losses (P200); and if he will make a statement.

The Department has had no recent discussions with Ofgem, the independent regulator, on its proposals for zonal transmission losses (proposed modification P200).

Transport

Airports: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many people cleared to work airside at UK airports are (a) UK citizens born in the UK, (b) UK citizens born abroad and (c) foreign nationals. (206492)

A survey of 29 airports to identify the number of UK and foreign nationals cleared to work in airside areas indicated that from a total of around 190,000 airside workers 78 per cent. were UK nationals and 14 per cent. were foreign nationals (including 8 per cent. from the EU). The nationality of the remainder was not recorded.

Aviation

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what steps her Department takes to promote compliance with the provisions of the Civil Aviation (Denied Boarding, Compensation and Assistance) Regulations 2005 and European regulations in respect of payment of compensation for (a) cancelled and (b) delayed flights; (223134)

(2) what steps her Department has taken following non-compliance on the part of airline operators with Council Regulation (EC) No. 261/2004 on duties to deliver compensation and assistance in respect of cancelled and delayed flights since the Regulation came into force.

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has been designated as the enforcement body under EC Regulation 261/2004 and the Air Transport Users Council (AUC) is the designated complaints handling body.

The CAA takes a proactive approach to the promotion of air carrier compliance by ensuring that all airlines that operate from the UK are aware of their obligations under this legislation. This is supported by active monitoring of the experiences of air passengers; including unannounced airport spot checks at airports. If an actual or potential breach of the regulation is identified, the CAA will offer guidance to the carrier concerned and if appropriate, undertake enforcement action.

The AUC manages individual passenger complaints and seeks to secure a satisfactory resolution in cases where the regulation is not being appropriately applied. If the AUC identifies a trend of apparent non-compliance, then it may refer the matter to the CAA for enforcement action.

Upon referral the CAA will undertake a comprehensive investigation and, where there is evidence that the regulation has been breached, initiate enforcement action. The CAA seeks to enforce the regulation in a proportionate and balanced manner. The nature of the action taken will depend on individual circumstances, but will seek to prevent a recurrence of the breach and that an individual passenger’s rights under the legislation are upheld. In parallel passengers also have the right to take their case to the Small Claims Court, which has proven to be an effective method of enabling passengers to obtain redress.

Aviation: Cancellation Rights

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what procedures are in place to ensure that airlines operating out of each airport within the UK comply with European rules on compensation for the cancellation of flights. (223470)

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: The, arrangements in the UK for promoting compliance with and enforcing regulation EC 261/2004 on compensation and assistance to air passengers in the event of denied boarding, cancellation or long delays are set out in the answer to the hon. Member’s questions today (UIN 223134 and 223135).

Birmingham New Street Station

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what her most recent estimate is of growth per annum in footfall at Birmingham New Street Station. (224006)

Birmingham New Street handles 1,350 trains and over 120,000 passengers daily; twice what it was originally designed for. Passenger growth of 30 per cent. has been experienced over the past 10 years, with similar levels forecast over the same period in future.

Longer trains and important improvements to the station's passenger handling capacity are set to deal with this growth.

Members: Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when she plans to answer the letter of 4 August 2008 from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton, with regard to Ms J. Reed. (224118)

Motor Vehicles: Excise Duties

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) how many late licence penalty notices were issued by the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency in each year since 1997; (210697)

(2) how many late licence penalty notices were paid (a) within 28 days and (b) after 28 days in each year since 1997;

(3) how many convictions the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency has obtained for failing to pay a late licence penalty notice in each year since 1997;

(4) many late licence penalty notices were appealed against in each year since 1997; and how many appeals were successful.

The Agency began issuing late licensing penalty letter (LLP) with the introduction of Continuous Registration (CR) in 2004. The volumes of LLPs issued each financial year since the commencement of CR are as follows:

Number

2004-05

1,183,544

2005-06

1,341,598

2006-07

1,272,384

2007-08

1,219,462

Over this period the volumes of penalty notices paid within 28 days are:

Number

2004-05

253,712

2005-06

326,036

2006-07

308,897

2007-08

352,615

The volumes of penalty notices paid after 28 days are:

Number

2004-05

61,699

2005-06

92,626

2006-07

84,027

2007-08

107,714

The number of county court judgements (CCJ's) issued since CR are:

Number

2004-05

74,872

2005-06

114,713

2006-07

84,545

2007-08

5,626

Many offenders do not pay first time on receipt of the LLP or the reminder letter. Initially, the Agency used the Civil Court procedure to deal with non payment but this process gave poor results and costs were high.

The Agency had to have an effective and efficient mechanism for pursuing the offenders who did not pay their LLP's. Therefore, in June 2006 to August 2007, the Agency carried out a trial using debt collection agents to pursue the payment. The use of debt collectors was found to be far more efficient and effective and in February 2008, the Agency commenced external debt collection activity by passing CR cases for the period of June 2007 to its three appointed debt collection agencies.

The Agency does not hold statistics to readily identify the number of appeals received in cases for which an LLP has been issued. These details could be provided only at disproportionate cost. However, the number of cases closed due to dispute and/or mitigating circumstances is:

Number

2004-05

313,819

2005-06

397,543

2006-07

209,286

2007-08

134,746

These figures do not include other areas of closure e.g. the Agency was unable to trace the registered keeper.

During the above periods, in addition to CR, the Agency carried out other pro-active enforcement activities to tackle evaders. These included on road enforcement, wheelclamping and the use of Automated Number Plate Reader Systems (ANPR). The Agency also worked closely with other enforcement bodies such as the Police and VOSA.

Motor Vehicles: Testing

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 23 May 2007, Official Report, column 1355W, on motor vehicles: testing, what consultations were conducted on options for the future conduct of the MOT scheme; what the findings of such consultations were; and if she will make a statement. (224208)

There has been no formal public consultation on changes to the MOT scheme. Officials have had informal discussions on various occasions with representatives from a number of sectors including vehicle manufacturers, testers and insurers.

Discussions with colleagues in other Government Departments have continued while we evaluate the very detailed evidence that has been gathered and we expect to make an announcement on this subject shortly.

Public Transport: Fees and Charges

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what recent estimate she has made of the impact of trends in fuel costs on the cost of providing (a) bus and (b) rail transport. (224068)

No estimate of the impact of trends in fuel costs on the cost of providing rail transport has been made by the Department for Transport. The impact on public finances is uncertain as a change in fuel cost increases both the cost of operating the railway and rail patronage through modal shift. The increase in rail patronage leads to higher rail revenue, which is partially captured by the Department through lower subsidies.

The Department has not made direct estimates of the impact of fuel price trends on the cost of bus service provision. The impact on bus industry costs will depend on the rise in fuel costs and the extent to which the industry has fixed its fuel prices in advance. We have limited data on what proportion of fuel prices have been fixed in advance. However, on average around 9 per cent. of the bus operators’ costs are fuel costs, so a 10 per cent. rise in fuel costs will only increase total costs by 1 per cent. The rises in labour costs are likely to have had a more significant impact on bus industry costs in recent years.

Railways

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 21 July 2008, Official Report, column 889, on railways, and with reference to the answers of 21 June 2006, Official Report, column 1865W, on train usage, and 29 March 2007, Official Report, column 1694W, on railways, whether equivalent data were gathered for (a) 2006 and (b) 2007; and for what reasons such data are not being gathered in respect of 2008. (224000)

The Department for Transport has never collected such information about the rolling stock fleet in the format requested in order to conduct departmental business. On request, the Department has collated and presented such information about rolling stock in the past. However, this exercise has been judged to be a poor use of departmental resources given that this information is freely available from other sources. This exercise was last carried out in reply to the hon. Member for Epsom and Ewell’s (Chris Grayling) written question, answered on 29 March 2007, Official Report, column 1694W.

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to the answer of 21 July 2008, Official Report, column 891W, on railways: standards and with reference to the answers of 20 December 2005, Official Report, column 2914W, on C2C Line: Rail One, and 1 February 2006, Official Report, column 562W on train operating companies, whether equivalent data relating to (a) 2005 and (b) 2006 were gathered; and what the figures were in the most recent year in which the data were gathered. (224001)

The most recent financial year for which the Department holds complete data is 2007-08. For this data I refer the hon. Member to my answer of 21 July 2008, Official Report, column 891W.

The information requested was gathered in relation to financial years 2005-06 and 2006-07. This information is shown in the following table.

Train operating companyNumber of cancellations

2005-06

2006-07

ATW

2,837

2,214

c2c

1,343

1,152

Chiltern

1,366

938

Crosscountry1

1,435

1,382

East Midlands1

1,952

1,970

First Capital Connect

5,565

5,166

First Great Western

4,609

7,045

First Scotrail

7,546

8,532

Gatwick Express

579

535

London Midland1

6,203

6,198

London Overground1

2,753

2,301

Merseyrail

3,038

2,077

Northern

6,116

7,626

NXEA

7,261

9,207

NXEC

546

805

Southeastern

6,341

5,227

Southern

6,892

5,954

South Western

5,663

6,034

TransPennineExpress

856

981

Virgin West Coast

688

878

Network Total

73,589

76,222

1 These train operating companies were established in their present form in 2007. Numbers shown relate to the services currently operated by these companies.

Railways: Energy

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the average energy cost of operating a train along one mile of (a) electrified and (b) diesel rail is at September 2008 fuel prices. (224065)

Information on traction electricity prices for rail is published by Network Rail as part of the Appendices to Network Rail’s April 2008 Strategic Business Plan. The document is on the internet at the following address:

http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browse%20documents/StrategicBusinessPlan/Update/Structure%20of%20 Charges%20Appendices.pdf.

No comparable information is available on the prices paid by train operators for diesel fuel.

Railways: Exhaust Emissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many kilograms of carbon dioxide are emitted on average from operating a train along one mile of (a) electrified and (b) diesel, rail. (224066)

The amount of CO2 emitted by diesel and electric trains varies according to the type of train and its operating conditions. Figure 18 from Professor Roger Kemp’s recent report on rail traction energy compares the carbon performance of a range of domestic diesel and electric train types. Professor Kemp’s report can be found on the internet at the following address:

http://www.rssb.co.uk/pdf/reports/research/T618_traction-energy-metrics_final.pdf

Railways: Overcrowding

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport with reference to page 35 of the National Rail Trends Yearbook, what measure his Department will use to monitor overcrowding across train operating companies; how many train operating companies will be so monitored; and when the results of such monitoring will be collated. (224007)

The July 2007 White Paper, Delivering a Sustainable Railway, sets out a capacity metric in a High Level Output Specification (HLOS). The Department for Transport is currently developing a process by which it will report levels of crowding and delivery of the HLOS capacity metric.

The White Paper is available in the House Library or from the Department for Transport website:

www.dft.gov.uk.

Railways: Signals

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many times railway signals were passed at danger in each month of each year between 1997 and 2008. (224067)

The number of times signals were passed at danger on Britain’s mainline railway in each month of each year between 1997 and 2008 is shown in the following table. The information is taken from the SPAD reports published on the Office of Rail Regulation’s website and copies of which are available from the House Library.

The number of signals passed at danger (SPADs) each month from January 1997—June 2008

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

September

October

November

December

1997

41

51

62

66

42

52

55

73

47

68

85

36

1998

49

45

45

51

64

45

63

58

64

80

77

36

1999

59

45

54

46

55

68

66

53

55

73

56

22

2000

36

38

52

31

35

47

31

44

46

53

52

29

2001

33

42

43

37

56

33

50

48

30

40

44

32

2002

21

28

23

21

35

41

37

40

24

60

39

27

2003

37

23

29

21

33

29

38

34

29

47

46

36

2004

25

21

26

39

31

25

44

32

37

38

30

18

2005

27

23

34

21

17

40

28

27

31

41

31

25

2006

21

24

29

25

23

30

42

24

28

41

36

32

2007

27

13

19

21

30

28

31

23

29

41

39

24

2008

21

34

38

26

23

30

Roads: Tolls

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many bids for road pricing demonstration projects she has received; and how many of the eight demonstration schemes will utilise satellite technology. (223305)

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: On 15 September 2008 the Government confirmed the names of the companies that will run the demonstrations project on road pricing technology. Eight bids were received in response to the invitation to tender for the Road User Service Providers Framework, of which four were successful. They were T-Systems Ltd, Trafficmaster Plc, Sanef Tolling Limited and Intelligent Mechatronic Systems (UK): Satellite technology is a feature of each of these.

As we announced in 2007 and then updated Parliament on in July this year, these trials will explore how time-distance-place charging can work accurately, reliably and affordably while safeguarding privacy. Designing an effective mechanism to achieve these aims presents a significant challenge. We believe that this project will help local authorities in the longer-term development of their plans for combining a local congestion charging scheme with major investment in public transport.

Tolls: Manchester

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) whether it is her policy that Greater Manchester local authorities should begin to repay the £1.2 billion of loans proposed under the Transport Innovation Fund Scheme in 2013, whether or not a congestion charge has been implemented in Manchester by that date; (224044)

(2) if she will make it her policy to indemnify Greater Manchester local authorities for the cost of repayments of proposed loans under the Transport Innovation Fund in the event that any congestion charge revenues are insufficient to meet the liability;

(3) for which public transport schemes the Association of Greater Manchester authorities has undertaken to implement at least 80 per cent. of the scheme prior to the introduction of congestion charging; and what the estimated cost of each scheme is.

The Government awarded Programme Entry to the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities’ Transport Innovation Fund (TIF) proposals in June 2008. The £2.8 billion package that AGMA developed combined investment in public transport and a congestion charging scheme. It was produced on the basis that 80 per cent. of the public transport would be delivered by the time that the charging scheme went live in 2013. In considering whether to award Programme Entry to the Package, and commit in principle up to £1.5 billion of TIF grant, we made a thorough assessment of the financial plans that supported the package and the risks associated with its delivery. We concluded that although there was more work to do to further develop the Package, it could be awarded programme entry at this stage. Repayment of prudential borrowing associated with the Package is incorporated into Greater Manchester’s financial plans and, as with any prudential borrowing, this will be a matter for the authorities that undertake the borrowing.

The grant of Programme Entry does not denote any final commitment to provide funding for the AGMA proposals. The terms of the Programme Entry decision, including financial arrangements, are set out on DfT’s website.

Defence

Afghanistan: Peacekeeping Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate his Department has made of the number of civilian casualties resulting from the use of air power in Afghanistan; what discussions he has had on this issue with his counterparts in nations contributing to the International Security Assistance Force and Operation Enduring Freedom; and if he will make a statement. (223580)

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: The UK Government do not collate figures for civilian casualties in Afghanistan. We are in regular contact, at all levels, with our International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) partners to continue to ensure that our procedures to minimise the risk to civilians from the employment of Close Air Support are as effective as possible. Every effort is made by ISAF forces, including those of the UK, to avoid civilian casualties, which are always a source of profound regret.

Armed Forces: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) whether his Department includes military training in its definition of military co-operation in the context of the Madrid Declaration of 1989; (223532)

(2) on what date he was first informed of proposals for members of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army to attend Sandhurst;

(3) what recent discussions he has had with representatives of (a) the UK’s Permanent Representation to the European Union and (b) the European Commission on military co-operation with China and the Madrid Declaration 1989;

(4) when his Department first arranged for students from the People’s Liberation Army of China to attend Sandhurst.

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: The MOD’s bilateral programme with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is entirely consistent with the Government’s policy of seeking to influence, through positive engagement, China’s emergence as a responsible global player and with key allies’ policies. Any military training offered is limited in scale and content so that it will not affect the regional strategic balance or enhance the People’s Liberation Army’s capability for internal repression. We keep the use the People’s Liberation Army makes of MOD-provided training under review and these limited engagements will stop if there is firm evidence that any skills or knowledge we provide have been misused.

The planning for a Chinese officer cadet to attend Sandhurst began in 2006 as part of the MOD’s overall defence relations and security co-operation programme. China was offered the opportunity to send a cadet to Sandhurst on 13 April 2007 and the officer attended Sandhurst between 9 September 2007 and 8 August 2008. Because the cadet’s attendance at Sandhurst was consistent with the pan-Whitehall China strategy, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State was not made aware of this individual serial in a much wider programme, which was endorsed by officials. However, we have never sought to conceal such engagements. Indeed, I refer to the answers I gave to the right hon. Member for Richmond, Yorks (Mr. Hague) on 29 February 2008, Official Report, columns 2016-20W, and the hon. Member for Romford (Andrew Rosindell) on 6 May 2008, Official Report, column 840W, which listed foreign students who have attended the Academy since 1997, including the one from China.

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence has not had any recent discussions with representatives of the United Kingdom’s Permanent Representation to the European Union or the European Commission about military co-operation with China and the Madrid Declaration 1989.

Military Aircraft

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many Boeing-built, designed or supported (a) airborne platforms, (b) aircraft, (c) helicopters and (d) other air systems are (i) in use, (ii) in the process of acquisition or appraisal and (iii) under consideration for use in the three services. (223406)

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: The following table lists the major air assets which Boeing have either built, designed or currently support.

Asset

In use

Acquisition/Appraisal

Under consideration

Airborne Platforms

Aircraft

Sentry

7

C-17

6

Boeing RC-1351

3

Helicopters

Apache

67

Chinook Mk2/2A

40

Chinook Mk32

8

Other Air Systems

3

3

3

1 Under consideration for the assessment phase of Project HELIX (replacement for Nimrod R1 capability.)

2 These helicopters are being converted to a support helicopter configuration and will enter service from late 2009.

3 I am withholding the information as its disclosure would prejudice commercial interests.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many United States-built, designed or supported (a) airborne platforms, (b) aircraft, (c) helicopters and (d) other air systems are (i) in use and (ii) under contract for future delivery in the three services. (223407)

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: The following table lists the major air assets which United States companies have either built, designed or currently support.

Asset

In use

Future delivery

Airborne platforms

Reaper1

2

3

Desert Hawk III1

104

27

Aircraft

Hercules C-130K/J

41

Sentry

7

C-17

6

TriStar

9

BAE 125

6

Beech King Air 200

9

Joint Combat Aircraft2

2

2

Sentinel

4

1

Beech King Air 350 ER

4

Helicopters

Apache

67

Chinook Mk2/2A

40

Chinook Mk33

8

Sea King4

95

Bell 212

7

Bell 412

15

Other air systems

AMRAAM

5

Maverick

5

Sidewinder

5

Hellfire

5

Paveway II/III

5

1 Unmanned aerial vehicle.

2 For joint combat aircraft, the MOD has contracted for long lead production materiel as an enabler for its plans to purchase, subject to internal MOD and wider Government approval, three aircraft in early 2009. This purchase is required now to enable participation in joint Operational Test with the United States.

3 These helicopters are being converted to a support helicopter configuration and will enter service from late 2009.

4 These were built in the UK by what is now Agusta Westland under licence from Sikorsky.

5 I am withholding information on the number of weapons held as the disclosure would, or would be likely to prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the armed forces.

Note:

Further air assets are not included in the table. I am withholding this information as the disclosure would, or would be likely to prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the armed forces.

Military Police: Armoured Fighting Vehicles

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) when the Royal Military Police first (a) reported to his Department concerns that Land Rovers were deficient vehicles for operational duty and (b) requested replacement armoured vehicles; (223170)

(2) when the Royal Military Police first submitted an urgent operational requirement for armoured replacements for Land Rovers.

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: Records indicate that the possibility of Royal Military Police units being equipped with better protected vehicles, when required to deploy in advanced positions in operational theatres, was raised in both 1999 and 2003. We have no record of any earlier suggestions of this kind.

A large number of improvements have been introduced to the vehicle fleet in recent years, with the result that commanders now have a greater choice of better protected, more capable vehicles than at any time previously. Royal Military Police personnel have benefited from these improvements as have personnel from all arms and services. There are no current issues relating to better protected vehicles specifically for the Royal Military Police and we do not have any record of the Royal Military Police submitting an urgent operational requirement for armoured replacements for Land Rovers.

P5 Technical Laboratories

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the agenda is for the meeting of the P5 technical laboratories to be hosted by the UK; when the meeting will take place; and if he will make a statement. (224216)

In offering to host a P5 conference between the laboratories of the Nuclear Weapon States, I proposed that it should take place within the current Nuclear non-proliferation treaty review cycle ending in 2010. The UK preference would be to hold the conference in the second half of 2009. Nevertheless, it is important to emphasise that this will be a P5 conference hosted by the UK rather than a UK conference to which our P5 partners are simply invited. My officials are continuing to engage with our P5 partners to ensure the agenda for the conference meets each nation’s requirements in terms of timing and content. I will keep the House informed of progress.

Royal Fleet Auxiliary: Tankers

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many single-skin tankers there are in the Royal Fleet Auxiliary; what plans there are to replace them; and what the cost to his Department of environmental liability insurance for such tankers was in the last 12 months for which figures are available. (223210)

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: There are currently four single-hulled dedicated tankers in-service with the Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA) with a further two general replenishment ships that have a tanking capability.

As part of the Military Afloat Reach and Sustainability (MARS) programme, MOD is in the process of procuring up to six new double-hulled Fleet Tankers. The new Fleet Tankers will replace the dedicated tankers and, along with the two existing Wave class ships, will meet the Royal Navy's future tanking requirements, removing the need to utilise the two general replenishment ships for tanking purposes. We are working alongside four bidders in the next stage of the planned procurement process for the Fleet Tankers; the main investment decision is expected to be made during 2009.

In common with general Government policy, the MOD does not purchase insurance to cover claims arising from environmental accidents: rather, the Department bears the risk of any such claims. These arrangements apply to any incidents, including those that might arise through the use of single-hulled tankers.

Home Department

Asylum: Zimbabwe

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many Zimbabwean nationals (a) sought asylum in the UK, (b) were granted refugee status, (c) were allowed to remain in the UK and (d) were removed to Zimbabwe in each of the last five years. (214619)

[holding answer 2 July 2008]: The following tables show Zimbabwean principal asylum applications, initial decisions and removals, 2003-07, where available. Initial decisions do not necessarily relate to applications made in the same period. Removals do not necessarily relate to refused applications decided in the same period. Destination data for persons removed from the UK have only been collated since 2004, so this information is not available for earlier years. Removal figures only relate to those removed to Zimbabwe and not to other destinations.

Information on asylum is published annually and quarterly. Copies of asylum publications are available from the Library of the House and from the Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate website at:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration-asylum-stats.html

Asylum applications1 received in the United Kingdom, excluding dependants, and initial decisions2 on applications, 2003 to 2007, nationals of Zimbabwe

Principal applicants

2003

2004

2005

20063

20073

Applications

Total

3,295

2,065

1,075

1,650

1,755

Port

715

395

165

165

265

In country

2,580

1,665

910

1,480

1,490

Decisions

Total decisions

4,190

2,560

1,040

1,680

1,425

Grants of asylum

875

220

80

140

250

Grants of ELR4

10

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Grants of HP4

5

*

*

*

*

Grants of DL4

20

25

15

30

20

Total refusals

3,285

2,310

945

1,510

1,155

Certified refusals

45

*

5

5

10

Other refusals

2,810

2,130

870

1,430

1,125

Third country refusals5

10

10

5

*

Non-compliance refusals6

420

165

70

70

20

n/a = Not applicable.

1 Figures rounded to nearest 5, (‘—’ = 0, * = 1 or 2).

2 Information is of initial decisions, excluding the outcome of appeals or other subsequent decisions.

3 Provisional figures.

4 Humanitarian protection and discretionary leave replaced exceptional leave to remain from 1 April 2003.

5 Refused on the grounds that the applicant had arrived from a safe third country.

6 Paragraph 340 of Immigration Rules. For failure to provide evidence to support the asylum claim within a reasonable period, including failure to respond to invitation to interview.

Source:

Immigration Research and Statistics

Removals, voluntary departures and assisted returns1,2 of Zimbabwean asylum applicants, excluding dependants removed to Zimbabwe, 2004-073

Zimbabwean asylum applicants removed to Zimbabwe

Number of removals

2004

100

2005

245

20064

215

20074

165

1 Includes persons refused entry at port and subsequently removed (including cases dealt with at juxtaposed controls), persons departing voluntarily after enforcement action had been initiated against them and persons leaving under Assisted Voluntary Return Programmes run by the International Organization for Migration.

2 Removals since 2005 include those who it is established have left the UK without informing the immigration authorities.

3 Persons who had sought asylum at some stage.

4 Provisional figures

Note:

Figures are rounded to the nearest five.

Corporate Hospitality

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department on how many occasions she has accepted corporate hospitality in the last 12 months. (171300)

Departmental Buildings

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much her Department spent on (a) new capital investment and (b) refurbishment of property in each of the last 10 years, broken down by project. (212866)

The Department's accounts system does not hold the information at the requested level of detail. An answer could not be provided without incurring disproportionate cost.

Departmental Conferences

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if she will list the conferences hosted by her Department in each of the last two years; and what the cost was of each conference. (211698)

The amount spent on conference activity in 2006-07 was £9,325,652. The main conferences were “Tackling Drugs—Changing Lives”; New Asylum Model; eBorders Industry events; Schools Pack and “Drugs, Alcohol and Social Work”.

The amount spent on conference activity in 2007-08 was £4,020,987. The main conferences were “Victim Support—the changing landscape of crime”; “Tackling Drugs: Changing Lives”; National Identity Scheme Bidder; Young People Consultation and European Refugee Fund external stakeholder event.

Information on the cost of each conference could be obtained only at disproportionate cost, as the data are not recorded separately on the Department’s accounting systems.

Departmental Data Protection

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether personal data held by her Department are always encrypted prior to being transferred to compact discs for transmission. (180400)

In line with current Cabinet Office guidance, the Home Office does not always encrypt personal data before transferring it by disc. Since 22 November 2007, the Home Office has been undertaking a review of its technical, process and procedural arrangements to ensure that the risk of data being compromised is managed and reduced to a minimum.

I also refer the hon. Member to the statement made by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister on 21 November 2007, Official Report, column 1179:

“...I have asked the Cabinet Secretary and security experts to ensure that all Departments and all agencies check their procedures for the storage and use of data...”

An interim progress report on the review was published by the Cabinet Office through a written ministerial statement on 17 December 2007, Official Report, column 98WS. This included a recommendation to enhance the transparency with Parliament, and the public about the action taken to safeguard information and the results of that action, through publication of results Departmental annual reports and an annual report to Parliament.

Departmental ICT

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) mobile telephones, (b) personal digital assistants and (c) laptop computers issued to departmental staff were reported (i) lost, (ii) missing and (iii) stolen since 2001. (184321)

We only have accurate information for the last three years.

In 2005 26 mobiles were recorded as lost, seven as stolen and four as missing. No personal digital assistants (PDAs) were recorded as lost, stolen or missing, three laptops were reported as lost and 11 laptops were reported as stolen.

In 2006 seven mobiles were recorded as lost and three as missing. Five PDAs were reported as lost and two were reported as stolen. Additionally, three laptops were reported as lost, one as missing and 10 as stolen.

In 2007 43 mobile telephones were reported as lost and four were reported as stolen. Nine PDAs were reported as lost and three stolen. Additionally, three laptops were reported as lost and 12 reported as stolen.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what IT contracts her Department and its agencies have entered into in the last two years. (215119)

The Home Department and its agencies have awarded the following information technology (IT) contracts in the last two years.

Department/Agency

Contractor's name

Description of contract

Home Department

Sawis

Hosting of applications on the GSI for access by various desktop networks

UKBA

Trusted Borders Consortium

Delivery of a modernised border control

UKBA

Finsoft Financial Systems

Provision of a collaborative Business Portal for 3 party accommodation providers software system and support.

IPS

Datacard

Public Card Reader

IPS

Kallidus

Learning Tool

IPS

nCipher

Develop Cardlink and Primelink EAC 672W

IPS

Saba Solutions

Virtual Classroom SW

Departmental Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the change in the number of employees in her Department and its agencies has been since July 2006. (217064)

The Home Office annual reports provide the staff numbers for each of the last two years.

2007-08 Annual Report, information is available on page 102, table reference 5.6

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/ho-annual-report-08?view=Binary.

2006-07 Annual Report, information is available on page 112, table reference 5.6

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/ho-annual-report-07?view=Binary.

In 2006-07 the Home Office HQ included the following departments: Communities Group, National Offender Management Service (NOMS) and Office for Criminal Justice Reform (OCJR). NOMS and OCJR left in May 2007 to join the new Ministry of Justice, and Communities Group transferred to Department for Communities and Local Government in May 2006.

Departmental Marketing

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much her Department and its agencies spent on branding and marketing activity in 2007-08. (212054)

The Home Office and its agencies (the UK Border Agency, the Identity and Passport Service and the Criminal Records Bureau) spent a total of £10,208,700 on branding and marketing activity in 2007-08.

Departmental Overtime

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the cost of overtime payment paid to staff in her Department was in each of the last 12 months, broken down by pay grade. (221303)

Home Office policy is that overtime working is kept to a minimum and used only in periods of exceptional work pressure. However, because of the nature of immigration work, immigration staff in the UK Border Agency are routinely required to work shifts which attract overtime payments, including premium payments for all weekend working (whether or not it is overtime).

As immigration staff represent a significant proportion of total staff, over 75 per cent. of overtime cost is attributable to immigration staff duties, most of which will be due to the need to undertake routine shift work. Immigration staff are also required to stay beyond their usual shift working time to complete passenger casework and minimise disruption to the majority of the travelling public.

Table 1, placed in the House Library, summarises all gross overtime payments made to employees in the core Home Office, UK Border Agency, Identity and Passport Service and Criminal Records Bureau, for each of the last 12 months. The data are broken down by grade and also record, separately, immigration staff. It has not proved possible to include employer pension and employer national insurance costs without incurring disproportionate costs.

Departmental Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much was claimed in reimbursable expenses by special advisers in her Department in each of the last 10 years. (215224)

Information on how much was claimed in reimbursable expenses by special advisers from 1998 to 2001 is not held centrally. Information from 2002 to 2008 is as follows:

£

2002-03

323

2003-04

226

2004-05

1,817.94

2005-06

514.29

2006-07

538.61

2007-08

1,150.77

Procedures for reimbursing staff expenses are set out in the staff handbook and are in line with the provisions set out in the Civil Service Management Code. The code can be viewed at:

www.civilservice.gov.uk/iam/codes/csmc/index.asp.

Departmental Postal Services

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what steps her Department has taken to monitor the cost of its mail services in the last 12 months. (221491)

For the last 12 month, the cost of mail services has been monitored at regular intervals to ensure that mail budgets are not exceeded and value for money is secured. The Department has liaised with the existing, as well as alternative, mail service providers in order to review efficiency and ensure best value.

Entry Clearances

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department which 80 immigration routes the Government are replacing; and how many entry clearances were granted under each route in the latest year for which figures are available. (212857)

[holding answer 20 June 2008]: Those routes scheduled to be replaced under the Government's points system include:

Fresh Talent: Working in Scotland scheme

Highly Skilled Migrant programme

Innovators

International Graduates scheme

Investors

Persons intending to establish themselves in business

Self-employed lawyers

Writers, composers and artists

Airport-based operational ground staff

Intra-company transfer

Jewish agency employees

Ministers of Religion, Missionaries and Members of Religious Orders

Named researchers

Overseas qualified nurse or midwife

Overseas representatives (news media)

Sabbatical posts

Seafarers

Training and work experience scheme (also tier 5)

Work permit employment (also tier 5)

Association of American Study Abroad programme

Bar students

Exchange students

Music students

Pestalozzi Childrens' Trust

Pupillage

Resit of Examinations

Riding schools

Sandwich students

St. George’s University School of Medicine

Student nurses

Students

Welbeck college (Army recruits)

Writing up a thesis

Au Pair (non EEA)

British Universities North America Club

China Graduate Work Experience programme

EU Leonardo da Vinci programme

Exchange teachers and language assistants

Gap year entrants

General Agreement on Trade and Services

International Association for the Exchange of students of Technical Expertise

International Fire Fighter Fellowship programme

Japan Youth Exchange scheme

Medical Training Initiative

Non-pastoral religious workers

Overseas domestic workers in diplomatic households

Overseas Government employees

Research assistants to Members of Parliament

Rudolf Steiner

Sponsored researchers

Training and Work Experience scheme (also Tier 2)

Vander Elst

Visiting religious workers

Voluntary workers

Work permit employment (also Tier 2)

Working Holidaymaker scheme

Overseas domestic workers in private households

Retired persons of independent means

Sole representatives

Aircrew

Civilian personnel in foreign armed forces

Nurses in supervised practice

Postgraduate doctors and dentists

Turkish European Community Association Agreement

UK Ancestry

Offshore workers

Employees of firms under contract to NATO

Seasonal agricultural workers

Sector Based schemes

Entertainers' Concession (incl PFFs)

Sportspersons' Concession

Clinical attachment or dental observer

Film Crew on Location

PLAB Test

Prospective students

It is not possible to separately identify the entry clearance for each of these routes without incurring disproportionate cost, as many are currently covered by a single entry clearance process.

Entry Clearances: Working Holidays

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many entry clearances were granted under the working holidaymakers scheme in each of the last five years; and how many were granted to applicants from each of the top 10 source countries in those years. (212855)

[holding answer 20 June 2008]: The total number of entry clearances issued globally under the Working Holidaymaker (WHM) Scheme in each of the last four financial years (2004-08) is shown in the table. The number of such entry clearances issued in the top 10 WHM source countries in each of these years is also shown.

In FY 2003-04, a total of 59,822 WHM visas were issued globally. However, we are unable to provide accurate figures for the numbers issued in individual countries in this or previous financial years.

The data shown in the following tables are unpublished and should therefore be treated as provisional.

Working holidaymaker visas issued: FY 2004—FY 2008

Country

FY 2004-05 issued

1

Australia

23,257

2

South Africa

21,781

3

Canada

5,258

4

New Zealand

4,833

5

Ghana

3,224

6

India

2,033

7

Malaysia

1,470

8

Namibia

1,101

9

United States

674

10

Sri Lanka

639

Total (top 10)

64,270

Total (all countries)

69,132

Country

FY 2005-06 issued

1

Australia

19,197

2

South Africa

16,773

3

Canada

4,508

4

New Zealand

4,408

5

Ghana

2,231

6

India

1,550

7

United States

479

8

Trinidad and Tobago

461

9

Singapore

315

10

Irish Republic

248

Total (top 10)

50,170

Total (all countries)

52,598

Country

FY 2006-07 issued

1

Australia

20,588

2

South Africa

8,946

3

New Zealand

4,664

4

Canada

3,852

5

India

2,302

6

Ghana

1,406

7

Bangladesh

548

8

United States

362

9

Malaysia

313

10

Trinidad and Tobago

301

Total (top 10)

43,282

Total (all countries)

46,048

Country

FY 2007-08 issued

1

Australia

14,948

2

South Africa

6,374

3

New Zealand

3,306

4

Canada

3,060

5

India

2,686

6

Malaysia

1,016

7

Ghana

855

8

Bangladesh

602

9

Trinidad and Tobago

285

10

United States

260

Total (top 10)

33,392

Total (all countries)

35,641

Note:

Date range— 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2008.

Source:

CRS (30 July 2008)

Immigration Controls

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what estimate she has made of the average number of employees per sponsor likely to be applied for under tier 2 of the points-based system. (218909)

We do not yet have projected figures for the average number of migrant employees per sponsor.

Our analysis of historic work permit data shows that an average annual figure for migrant employees per employer is not indicative of employer/migrant activity overall. It is skewed towards a very low average, and therefore we believe it is of limited use for planning or reporting purposes.

However, historical data relating to work permits show 81.6 per cent. of organisations over a four year period used less than five work permits each.

Immigration: Appeals

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the target processing time has been in relation to appeals to asylum and immigration tribunals in each of the last five years. (224107)

I have been asked to reply.

The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT) (prior to April 2005 the Immigration Appellate Authority) has joint target processing times with the Home Office and information covering each of the last five years is shown in the following table.

Target

Performance

2007-08

Joint PSA target with the Home Office: To grant or remove 90 per cent. of asylum claimants within six months by the end of 2011

46 per cent. of new applications received in June 2007 were concluded within six months by the end of December 2007

Milestone: 40 per cent. of new asylum claimants by December 2007

2007-081

Receipt in AIT to promulgation by Immigration Judge:

Asylum—75 per cent. in six weeks

Asylum—61 per cent. in six weeks

Managed Migration (In Country Immigration)—75 per cent. in eight weeks

Managed Migration—66 per cent. in eight weeks

Entry Clearance (Out of Country Immigration)—75 per cent. within 10 weeks of receipt of respondent’s bundle

Entry Clearance—49 per cent. in 10 weeks of receipt of respondent’s bundle

Family Visit Visa—75 per cent. within 10 weeks of receipt of respondent’s bundle

Family Visit Visas—66 per cent. in 10 weeks of receipt of respondent’s bundle

2006-07

Joint PSA target with the Home Office: To grant or remove 90 per cent. of asylum claimants within six months by the end of 2011

38 per cent. of new applications received in September 2006 were concluded within six months

Milestone: 35 per cent. of new asylum claimants by April 2007

2005-06

Joint PSA target with the Home Office: 75 per cent. of substantive asylum applications including the final appeal decided within six months

74 per cent. of applications received in 2005-06 had a final decision up to and including appeal, within six months

2004-05

Joint PSA target with the Home Office: 65 per cent. of substantive asylum applications including the final appeal decided within six months

67 per cent. of substantive applications in 2004-05 had a final decision up to and including appeal at the Immigration Appeal Tribunal, within six months

2004-05

75 per cent. of asylum cases, covered by the PSA, to be decided by adjudicators within 12 weeks from receipt

77 per cent. decided within 12 weeks of receipt

2003-04

Joint PSA target with the Home Office: 60 per cent. of substantive asylum applications including final appeal decided within six months

64 per cent. of substantive applications in 2003-04 had a final decision up to and including appeals at the Immigration Appeal Tribunal, within six months

1 Key Performance Indicators were introduced in April 2007 to measure the waiting times for all main AIT case types.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the average processing time has been for appeals to asylum and immigration tribunals in each of the last five years. (224108)

I have been asked to reply.

The average processing times for appeals to the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (prior to April 2005 the Immigration Appellate Authority) in each of the last five years is available and the information is shown as follows.

Case type1

Average waiting time from receipt in the IAA/AIT to promulgation by an Adjudicator/Immigration Judge2 (weeks)

2007-08

Asylum

8

Managed Migration (In Country Immigration)

10

Entry Clearance (Out of Country Immigration)

26

Family Visit Visas

20

2006-07

Asylum

9

Managed Migration (In Country Immigration)

10

Entry Clearance (Out of Country Immigration)

30

Family Visit Visas

30

2005-063

Asylum

15

Managed Migration (In Country Immigration)

10

Entry Clearance (Out of Country Immigration)

17

Family Visit Visas

22

2004-05

Asylum

17

Immigration

12

Family Visit Visas

10

2003-04

Asylum

17

Immigration

13

Family Visit Visas

8

1 Separate information on In Country and Out of Country Immigration appeals is not available prior to April 2005.

2 Average waiting time information is taken from reports produced for internal use by the IAA and AIT from their databases. It is not subject to the same quality checks as performance targets and other published data.

3 Data for 2005-06 taken from the AIT database ARIA, and covers from commencement of AIT on 4April 2005.

Parking Offences: Fixed Penalties

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what research her Department has (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated on the relationship between the level of penalty imposed for parking offences and the incidence of such offences. (224056)

I have been asked to reply.

Local authorities in England with the power to enforce parking on the street and in local authority owned car parks may issue penalty charge notices to vehicles parked in contravention of the regulations. The primary purpose of a penalty charge is to encourage compliance with parking regulations and authorities are advised to adopt the lowest charge level consistent with a high level of public acceptability and compliance. Authorities must set levels that comply with the guidelines of the Mayor (in London) and the Secretary of State (outside London). A range of factors may influence the incidence of parking contraventions in particular areas. The Department for Transport has not commissioned or evaluated specific research on this particular factor.

Police: Ethnic Groups

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what percentage of (a) police community support officers and (b) regular police officers fall into each ethnic category in each police force area. (219157)

The available data are given in the following tables.

Table 1: Police community support officer ethnicity1 by police force area as at 31 March 2007

Percentage

Police force

White

Mixed

Black or Black British

Asian or Asian British

Chinese or Other ethnic group

Not stated

Avon and Somerset

96

1

1

1

1

1

Bedfordshire

89

4

1

6

0

0

Cambridgeshire

93

2

1

3

0

1

Cheshire

100

0

0

0

0

0

Cleveland

98

0

0

2

0

0

Cumbria

99

1

0

0

0

0

Derbyshire

96

1

1

2

0

0

Devon and Cornwall

67

0

0

0

1

31

Dorset

98

1

0

2

0

0

Durham

99

1

0

1

0

0

Essex

95

1

1

1

0

2

Gloucestershire

87

2

0

2

1

8

Greater Manchester

96

0

1

3

0

0

Hampshire

98

0

0

0

0

1

Hertfordshire

95

0

1

2

0

2

Humberside

99

1

1

0

0

0

Kent

96

1

0

1

1

0

Lancashire

98

1

0

1

0

1

Leicestershire

90

0

0

9

0

0

Lincolnshire

99

0

1

0

0

0

London, City of

83

8

3

6

0

0

Merseyside

95

4

0

2

0

0

Metropolitan Police

67

4

11

12

4

1

Norfolk

97

0

1

1

1

0

Northamptonshire

93

4

2

1

0

0

Northumbria

98

1

0

0

0

0

North Yorkshire

99

0

1

0

0

0

Nottinghamshire

96

1

0

3

0

0

South Yorkshire

95

0

3

1

0

0

Staffordshire

96

1

0

2

0

0

Suffolk

99

1

0

0

0

0

Surrey

93

0

1

3

0

2

Sussex

95

1

0

0

1

3

Thames Valley

93

2

0

4

0

0

Warwickshire

94

0

1

4

0

1

West Mercia

93

1

0

1

0

5

West Midlands

85

2

2

9

0

1

West Yorkshire

95

0

1

4

0

0

Wiltshire

98

1

1

0

0

0

Dyfed-Powys

99

0

1

0

0

0

Gwent

97

0

1

2

0

0

North Wales

96

1

0

1

0

2

South Wales

98

0

0

1

0

1

1 Percentage figures based on full-time equivalent figures that have been rounded to the nearest whole number. Because of rounding, there may be an apparent discrepancy between totals and the sums of the constituent items.

Table 2: Police officer ethnicity1 by police force area as at 31 March 2007

Percentage

Police force

White

Mixed

Black or Black British

Asian or Asian British

Chinese or Other ethnic group

Not stated

Avon and Somerset

98

0

1

0

0

0

Bedfordshire

93

1

1

3

0

2

Cambridgeshire

96

1

0

1

0

1

Cheshire

99

1

0

0

0

0

Cleveland

96

0

0

1

0

2

Cumbria

99

1

0

0

0

0

Derbyshire

96

1

0

2

0

0

Devon and Cornwall

91

0

0

0

0

8

Dorset

99

1

0

0

0

0

Durham

98

1

0

1

0

0

Essex

98

1

0

0

0

0

Gloucestershire

98

1

0

0

0

0

Greater Manchester

96

1

1

1

0

0

Hampshire

90

1

0

1

1

8

Hertfordshire

96

1

0

1

0

1

Humberside

99

0

0

0

0

0

Kent

98

1

0

1

0

0

Lancashire

87

1

0

2

0

11

Leicestershire

93

1

1

3

0

2

Lincolnshire

99

0

0

0

0

0

London, City of

95

1

2

2

0

0

Merseyside

97

1

0

0

1

0

Metropolitan Police

92

1

2

3

1

0

Norfolk

98

1

0

0

0

1

Northamptonshire

87

1

1

1

0

9

Northumbria

98

1

0

0

0

0

North Yorkshire

99

1

0

1

0

0

Nottinghamshire

96

1

1

1

0

0

South Yorkshire

97

0

1

2

0

1

Staffordshire

98

1

1

0

0

0

Suffolk

98

1

0

0

0

0

Surrey

96

2

0

1

0

1

Sussex

99

1

0

0

0

0

Thames Valley

93

2

1

1

0

3

Warwickshire

95

1

0

3

0

1

West Mercia

99

0

0

1

0

0

West Midlands

92

1

2

4

0

0

West Yorkshire

96

1

1

2

0

0

Wiltshire

99

1

0

0

0

0

Dyfed-Powys

99

0

0

0

0

0

Gwent

99

1

0

0

0

0

North Wales

99

0

0

0

0

1

South Wales

86

1

0

0

0

12

1 Percentage figures based on full-time equivalent figures that have been rounded to the nearest whole number. Because of rounding, there may be an apparent discrepancy between totals and the sums of the constituent items.

Police: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if she will estimate the number of police officers (a) per head of population and (b) per notifiable offence in each year from 1997 in (i) England and Wales and (ii) each police force in England and Wales. (219110)

The available data are given in the following tables.

Table 1: Police officers0 (FTE)2 per 100,000 of the population by police force, as at 31 March 1997 to 31 March 2008

As at 31 March

Police force

19973

1998

1999

2000

20014

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Avon and Somerset

204

203

203

197

197

205

213

229

225

226

224

218

Bedfordshire

200

197

189

185

184

189

198

210

215

213

207

204

Cambridgeshire

188

184

179

172

179

187

196

197

194

196

187

183

Cheshire

209

208

211

204

204

209

217

224

223

223

225

218

Cleveland

261

266

255

252

253

263

294

314

305

308

315

303

Cumbria

233

237

229

220

213

224

237

254

257

256

255

251

Derbyshire

187

184

182

183

187

189

210

216

213

212

209

212

Devon and Cornwall

186

192

186

182

187

192

204

208

212

219

216

214

Dorset

189

192

186

189

196

198

205

209

211

216

217

216

Durham

240

249

258

256

263

266

281

288

293

288

285

272

Essex

197

193

190

183

178

181

186

192

198

203

203

203

Gloucestershire

205

198

197

200

209

209

219

229

230

228

229

234

Greater Manchester

268

270

265

264

268

279

298

323

321

318

314

315

Hampshire

198

199

197

193

193

195

208

211

212

211

215

214

Hertfordshire

205

202

198

201

184

174

191

204

206

208

210

204

Humberside

230

228

223

219

217

234

244

256

255

251

251

248

Kent

210

209

204

203

209

210

221

228

227

227

229

227

Lancashire

228

229

228

223

228

231

239

252

251

253

252

254

Leicestershire

211

214

215

215

218

224

232

246

246

241

237

233

Lincolnshire

196

193

184

179

191

189

191

189

185

183

183

175

London, City of5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

Merseyside

296

297

298

290

291

294

302

303

318

315

325

331

Metropolitan Police5

367

356

352

341

351

366

404

420

433

428

426

430

Norfolk

185

184

176

175

178

183

189

190

192

193

191

190

Northamptonshire

196

193

186

181

186

194

194

198

201

207

200

196

Northumbria

256

263

269

266

272

278

290

294

294

291

283

285

North Yorkshire

183

186

181

173

175

188

193

203

206

216

217

202

Nottinghamshire

225

225

216

214

214

226

239

245

245

243

235

224

South Yorkshire

242

244

243

243

245

246

252

261

260

259

256

248

Staffordshire

209

217

211

204

201

201

212

218

220

219

219

214

Suffolk

180

179

179

171

168

177

188

196

195

191

196

188

Surrey

209

207

212

227

192

184

182

183

184

184

183

179

Sussex

211

203

191

188

188

190

203

206

205

207

205

201

Thames Valley

180

183

180

178

175

177

186

195

198

202

199

194

Warwickshire

186

185

180

178

182

190

198

197

195

198

199

198

West Mercia

183

180

180

166

171

176

196

202

203

202

205

210

West Midlands

270

271

278

274

283

293

307

311

316

318

318

324

West Yorkshire

247

244

236

228

228

230

242

254

271

270

270

269

Wiltshire

195

195

192

185

184

189

190

198

198

196

192

190

Dyfed-Powys

212

210

215

217

219

234

237

236

237

237

236

237

Gwent

275

222

224

227

229

239

244

248

259

264

268

266

North Wales

208

213

212

213

220

228

234

243

250

242

238

234

South Wales

223

242

241

236

250

259

273

275

273

271

273

264

England and Wales

241

240

237

233

234

240

254

264

267

267

266

264

1 This table is based on full-time equivalent figures that have been rounded to the nearest whole number. Because of rounding, there may be an apparent discrepancy between totals and the sums of the constituent items.

2 Figures up to 31 March 2002 exclude staff on career breaks or maternity/paternity leave. The figures for 31 March 2003 onwards figures include those on career breaks or maternity/paternity leave.

3 Boundary changes on 1 April 1996 transferred resources for the policing of the Rhymney Valley from South Wales Police to Gwent Police.

4 Boundary changes on 1 April 2000 transferred some resources from the Metropolitan Police to Essex, Hertfordshire and Surrey police forces.

5 Officers per 100,000 population for City of London and Metropolitan Police are combined.

Table 2: Total offences per officer for 1997

Police force area

1997

Avon and Somerset

48

Bedfordshire

44

Cambridgeshire

47

Cheshire

30

Cleveland

43

Cumbria

31

Derbyshire

42

Devon and Cornwall

32

Dorset

34

Durham

32

Essex

31

Gloucestershire

43

Greater Manchester

44

Hampshire

36

Hertfordshire

29

Humberside

60

Kent

38

Lancashire

37

Leicestershire

41

Lincolnshire

36

London, City of

6

Merseyside

30

Metropolitan Police

30

Norfolk

37

Northamptonshire

46

Northumbria

37

North Yorkshire

37

Nottinghamshire

55

South Yorkshire

41

Staffordshire

39

Suffolk

30

Surrey

24

Sussex

37

Thames Valley

42

Warwickshire

39

West Mercia

38

West Midlands

39

West Yorkshire

47

Wiltshire

29

Dyfed-Powys

18

Gwent

38

North Wales

29

South Wales

44

England and Wales

37

Note:

Recorded crime statistics were collected on a calendar year basis up to 1997 and thereafter on a financial year basis. Therefore, these figures are not comparable with those for later years.

Source:

Population estimates are provided by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Table 3: Total offences per officer for 1998-99 to 2001-02

Police force area

1998-99

1999-2000

2000-01

2001-02

Avon and Somerset

50

50

50

57

Bedfordshire

47

52

48

49

Cambridgeshire

53

56

50

51

Cheshire

31

32

32

34

Cleveland

47

46

46

49

Cumbria

36

35

31

34

Derbyshire

48

48

45

49

Devon and Cornwall

38

39

35

33

Dorset

41

40

37

40

Durham

32

31

28

32

Essex

33

37

37

38

Gloucestershire

44

46

43

43

Greater Manchester

53

55

53

53

Hampshire

37

40

39

39

Hertfordshire

29

30

33

37

Humberside

66

63

58

57

Kent

40

39

39

36

Lancashire

36

34

36

42

Leicestershire

47

47

43

42

Lincolnshire

41

41

37

42

London, City of

9

11

12

13

Merseyside

33

36

35

37

Metropolitan Police

36

41

40

40

Norfolk

41

43

40

40

Northamptonshire

58

55

49

50

Northumbria

39

38

35

35

North Yorkshire

41

42

40

42

Nottinghamshire

61

62

61

68

South Yorkshire

42

42

39

42

Staffordshire

41

46

49

55

Suffolk

34

38

39

42

Surrey

26

26

31

31

Sussex

46

48

48

47

Thames Valley

47

51

51

52

Warwickshire

42

43

40

44

West Mercia

40

45

40

51

West Midlands

43

51

49

48

West Yorkshire

55

54

54

61

Wiltshire

33

34

33

33

Dyfed-Powys

24

23

22

21

Gwent

47

48

45

35

North Wales

32

32

33

36

South Wales

45

43

35

36

England and Wales:

41

43

42

43

Notes:

1. The coverage was extended and counting rules revised from 1989-99. Figures from that date are not directly comparable with those for 1997 and earlier.

2. The data in this table are prior to the introduction of the National Crime Recording Standard. These figures are not directly comparable with those for later years.

Source:

Population estimates are provided by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Table 4: Total offences per officer for 2002-03 to 2007-08

Police force area

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Avon and Somerset

55

48

48

46

48

43

Bedfordshire

55

53

48

50

48

44

Cambridgeshire

61

57

53

47

50

48

Cheshire

40

42

41

44

41

37

Cleveland

47

44

41

43

40

40

Cumbria

33

32

35

35

31

29

Derbyshire

52

48

41

40

40

37

Devon and Cornwall

41

40

40

36

36

32

Dorset

44

44

40

40

37

35

Durham

31

29

27

31

32

30

Essex

46

47

42

40

39

36

Gloucestershire

45

45

41

41

40

34

Greater Manchester

52

46

40

41

42

38

Hampshire

42

48

46

47

48

43

Hertfordshire

44

46

46

45

42

38

Humberside

63

64

56

52

51

44

Kent

37

38

38

41

40

36

Lancashire

39

43

43

40

38

34

Leicestershire

45

42

42

41

42

40

Lincolnshire

51

49

48

47

45

43

London, City of

12

11

10

10

9

9

Merseyside

40

41

40

41

35

29

Metropolitan Police

39

36

33

32

30

28

Norfolk

48

46

43

42

40

36

Northamptonshire

61

63

58

52

52

50

Northumbria

42

39

35

33

33

28

North Yorkshire

47

47

40

36

33

32

Nottinghamshire

67

64

57

56

57

54

South Yorkshire

48

43

43

50

49

46

Staffordshire

49

48

44

46

46

40

Suffolk

40

41

40

41

38

37

Surrey

36

38

37

36

39

36

Sussex

44

44

46

44

43

39

Thames Valley

54

52

50

48

50

48

Warwickshire

44

45

43

42

43

39

West Mercia

47

45

40

36

34

33

West Midlands

45

43

36

36

34

30

West Yorkshire

64

62

47

46

44

40

Wiltshire

38

35

33

35

37

37

Dyfed-Powys

22

27

28

26

26

22

Gwent

46

43

40

37

36

33

North Wales

42

39

33

31

34

29

South Wales

44

42

38

38

37

39

England and Wales:

45

43

40

39

38

35

Notes:

The data in this table take account of the introduction of the National Crime Recording Standard in April 2002. These figures are therefore not directly comparable with those for earlier years.

Source:

Population estimates are provided by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Work Permits: Health Professions

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department which 20 non-EU nationalities received the most work permits for (a) doctors and (b) nurses in each year since 1997; and how many such work permits were issued to non-EU nationals in each of those years. (210421)

Tables placed in the House Library show the 20 non-EU nationalities (where applicable) with the highest number of work permits granted each year for doctors and nurses in the period 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2007.

Children, Schools and Families

Adoption

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) how many (a) people and (b) couples had been assessed as suitable adoptive parents and were yet to adopt at the most recent date for which information is available; (223342)

(2) how many (a) people and (b) couples were assessed as suitable adoptive parents in each of the last 10 years;

(3) how many children who were adopted waited longer than (a) one month, (b) six months and (c) one year to be adopted following the decision that adoption was in their best interest in each of the last five years.

[holding answer 10 September 2008]: The information requested is as follows:

223342

Data on how many (a) people and (b) couples have been assessed as suitable adoptive parents and were yet to adopt are not collected centrally by the Department.

223344

Data on how many (a) people and (b) couples have been assessed as suitable adoptive parents in each of the last 10 years are not collected centrally by the Department.

223345

Information on how many children who were adopted waited longer than (a) one month, (b) six months and (c) one year to be adopted following the decision that adoption was in their best interest in each of the last five years is shown in the following table.

The table provides the information requested for looked after children who were adopted. The figures shown for the time between the decision that adoption was in the child's best interest and the date of adoption are cumulative.

Looked after children adopted during the years ending 31 March by the time between the decision that adoption was in their best interest and adoption, 2003 to 20071, 2

Year ending 31 March in which adopted

England

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

All Children looked after adopted

3,500

3,800

3,800

3,700

3,300

Time between decision that adoption was in the best interest and adoption

More than 1 month (30 days)

3,500

3,800

3,800

3,700

3,300

More than 6 months (182 days)

3,400

3,600

3,600

3,500

3,200

More than 1 year

2,500

2,700

2,600

2,500

2,400

1 SSDA903 return on children looked after.

2 Historical data may differ from older publications. This is mainly due to the implementation of amendments and corrections sent by some local authorities after the publication date of previous materials.

Children: Databases

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how and by whom the new statutory guidance on sections 10 and 11 of the Children Act 2004 will be monitored and evaluated; and when he expects the first evaluation to be completed. (223353)

As set out in the Children’s Plan launched by the Secretary of State in December 2007, the Government are committed to publishing revised statutory guidance under Section 10 of the Children Act 2004 on inter-agency co-operation to improve the well-being of children, young people and families later this year. A revised version of the statutory guidance under Section 11 on making arrangements to safeguard and promote the welfare of children, originally issued in 2005, was published in April 2007. The Government have no plans to issue further revised guidance at this stage.

The Government have no plans to provide specific additional funding for implementing these guidance documents, which are intended to clarify the statutory responsibilities of local authorities and other bodies, including health agencies, for which they receive mainstream funding. The Government have however commissioned an audit of the extent to which public organisations have been complying with their duties under Section 11. The results of the survey will be made public in spring 2009.

From April 2009, the performance of local authorities and their partners will be assessed under the new, multi-inspectorate Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA). This will focus on the delivery of key outcomes in an area, and the contribution of statutory and non-statutory partners, including health agencies, will be in scope. Inspectorates are currently consulting on CAA, and intend to publish their framework in February 2009. CAA will report annually, with the first reports in November 2009.

Departmental Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much was claimed in reimbursable expenses by press officers in his Department and its agencies in each of the last three financial years. (221169)

The total amount claimed as reimbursable expenses by press officers are as follows:

£

2005-06

2,688

2006-07

4,981

2007-08

5,036

These figures include expenses claimed by press officers who transferred to DIUS in the machinery of government changes in 2007. We do not hold records of expenses claimed by any outside agencies.

Education and Inspection Act 2006: Parenting Orders

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many parenting orders under section 98 of the Education and Inspection Act 2006 have been issued since September 2007. (224101)

To date, no local authority has applied to the courts for a parenting order following a pupil’s exclusion from school or for serious misbehaviour. Use of parenting orders was always intended to be a last resort, after local authorities and schools had used a wide range of strategies to address poor behaviour in schools such as voluntary parenting contracts for behaviour. 86 local authorities have agreed over 6,500 parenting contracts for behaviour since September 2004.

Education: Assessments

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) what proportion of (a) English, (b) mathematics and (c) science key stage 3 tests he estimates will have been marked and entered into the computer system by 15 July 2008; and if he will make a statement; (217700)

(2) what estimate he has made of the number of (a) key stage 2 and (b) key stage 3 pupils who will not receive their national test results in (i) English, (ii) mathematics and (iii) science by 18 July 2008; and if he will make a statement;

(3) which schools will not receive their national test results by 18 July 2008; and if he will make a statement;

(4) what progress has been made in marking key stage 2 and 3 national test papers; and if he will make a statement.

The administration and marking of national curriculum tests is a function of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) that is delivered independently of Government. The National Assessment Agency (NAA) manages the marking process within the QCA. NAA has advised that, to date, the proportion of Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 3 English, maths and science results available to schools are as follows:

Percentage

Key Stage 2

English

99.4

Mathematics

99.6

Science

99.7

Key Stage 3

English

97.4

Mathematics

98.9

Science

99.9

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) by what date he expects all key stage 2 test results to have been delivered to schools; (220484)

(2) by what date he expects all key stage 3 test results to have been delivered to schools.

The administration and marking of national curriculum tests is a function of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) that is delivered independently of Government. The National Assessment Agency (NAA) manages the marking process within the QCA. NAA has advised that, at present, over 99.5 per cent. of Key Stage 2 and over 98 per cent. of Key Stage 3 results have been made available to schools.

National Strategies: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the budget is, including monies allocated through the Standards Fund and Area-Based Agreements, for the National Strategies in 2008-09. (224222)

The budget allocated for the National Strategies programmes in 2008-09 is:

£86 million for the central support and challenge function to local authorities, schools and early years settings, including substantial free resources provided through the web and in hard copy form. This central resource supports a range of programmes, for example school improvement, behaviour and attendance and early years, whose local delivery is supported from other budgets.

£60 million for local authority delivery and support to schools which is now a component part of the area based grant paid to local authorities.

£218 million standards fund grant for schools to access the national strategies' core training and support.

Pre-School Education: Disadvantaged

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what steps his Department has taken to ensure that children from disadvantaged families have the same access to pre-school educational care as other children. (223557)

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: All three and four-year-olds are now guaranteed free, part time early education, so that they can receive two years high quality early learning before school starting age. Local authorities are required to reach out to particularly disadvantaged and hard to reach groups within their local community to maximise take up of this free entitlement. We are also piloting free early years provision to 13,000 disadvantaged two-year-olds across 32 local authorities. As set out in the Children's Plan, we are investing £100 million over three years to extend the offer of up to 15 hours of free early education and child care to a further 20,000 two-year-olds in the most disadvantaged communities.

Since April 2008, local authorities have been under a duty to secure sufficient child care for working parents in their area, paying particular attention to the needs of families from disadvantaged backgrounds as reported in their child care sufficiency assessments. We are also doing more than ever to make good quality child care affordable, particularly through spending some £3.5 million every day on tax credits for lower and middle income working families. The Department is running an ‘Affordable Childcare’ media campaign, aimed at disadvantaged families in particular, informing parents of the benefits of child care for children and the financial help available through tax credits. In addition, we are pursuing an initiative to improve the take-up of child care by hard-to-reach and black and minority ethnic families, as well as a scheme to help workless families with child care as they train for work.

Schools: Inspections

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what (a) formal and (b) informal support measures his Department provides to headteachers whose school is undergoing an Ofsted inspection. (224231)

The Department does not provide specific support to head teachers during a school inspection. However, Ofsted provides a helpline which head teachers can access if they need advice or have concerns about an inspection.

Ofsted aims to make the school inspection process as transparent as possible. It publishes its inspection guidance so that head teachers can benefit from a clear understanding of how their school will be inspected. It also produces the Self-evaluation Form (SEF) and jointly with Department provides schools with RAISEonline, a performance data package which allows schools to analyse their own performance. Both these link to the framework used by inspectors in assessing a school, which is published.

All schools have School Improvement Partners tasked with providing regular professional challenge and support in the process of school improvement, including help with taking forward Ofsted’s recommendations.

Schools: Standards

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what percentage of pupils who have taken part in the Making Good Progress pilot did not pass the single level test at the first attempt in (a) English, (b) mathematics and (c) science at key stage 2 (i) level 4 and (ii) level 5. (224223)

National level results of the single level tests have not yet been published. They will be published as part of an independent evaluation of the Making Good Progress pilot which is being conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers. Their interim report will be published in autumn 2008.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what percentage of pupils who have taken part in the Making Good Progress pilot to date reached key stage 2 level 4 in (a) English, (b) mathematics and (c) science by the end of year 6. (224224)

We are not able to provide results from the 2008 Key Stage 2 National Curriculum assessments for schools involved in the Making Good Progress pilot. These results are currently provisional and have been published at national and local authority level only.

The percentage of pupils achieving level 4 in Key Stage 2 National Curriculum assessments in English, mathematics and science will be published at school level, including schools involved in the Making Good Progress pilot, in the 2008 Primary Achievement and Attainment Tables.

National level results of the single level tests have not yet been published. They will be published as part of an independent evaluation of the Making Good Progress pilot which is being conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers. Their interim report will be published in autumn 2008.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) in how many schools (a) 75 per cent. or more and (b) 50 per cent. or more of pupils eligible to receive free school meals did not achieve a single GCSE above grade D in the latest academic year for which figures are available; (224226)

(2) in how many schools 50 per cent. or more of pupils did not achieve a single GCSE above grade D in the latest academic year for which figures are available.

The information requested is as follows.

In 103 schools 75 per cent. or more of the pupils eligible to receive free school meals did not attain any GCSE and equivalent grades higher than a D in 2006/07.

In 754 schools 50 per cent. or more of the pupils eligible to receive free school meals did not attain any GCSE and equivalent grades higher than a D in 2006/07.

Of the 76,568 pupils eligible for FSM attending maintained secondary schools who took any GCSE and equivalent in 2006/07, 30,881 (40.3 per cent.) did not attain grades higher than a D.

In 483 schools 50 per cent. or more of the pupils did not attain any GCSE and equivalent grades higher than a D in 2006/07.

These figures relate to GCSE and equivalent and based on pupils at the end of KS4 in all maintained schools.

Only schools with 10 or more pupils are included in the answer.

Sure Start Programme: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) what the total (a) number and (b) cost was of health visitors, midwives and community nursery nurses employed by Sure Start local programmes and paid for by the Sure Start Local Programme Block in 2007-08; and what the allocations are for these services in each year from 2008-09 to 2010-11; (223642)

(2) what the total (a) number and (b) cost was of dedicated outreach workers employed by Sure Start local programmes and paid for by the Sure Start Local Programme Block in 2007-08; and what the allocations are for these services in each year from 2008-09 to 2010-11.

[holding answer 15 September 2008]: The Department does not collect information on the total number and cost of staff employed in Sure Start children's centres and paid for by the Sure Start children's centre revenue funding in 2007-08 (Sure Start local programmes have all become children's centres). That is a matter for local management by local authorities and their partner agencies. We allocate revenue funding to local authorities for Sure Start children's centres through the Sure Start, Early Years and Childcare Grant. Local authorities determine how much individual centres receive to meet the needs of the local community. We notified local authorities of their Sure Start children's centres funding allocations for each year from 2008-09 to 2010-11 in August 2007 and these are available on the Sure Start website at

http://www.surestart.gov.uk/publications/index.cfm?document=1925

The majority of health visitors, midwives and community nursery nurses who work from children's centres are employed by the local health service and would not be funded by the Sure Start, Early Years and Childcare Grant. We do not collect information on how many health visitors, midwives and community nursery nurses work from children's centres.

Justice

Antisocial Behaviour: Fixed Penalties

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether he plans to increase the financial penalty arising from the issuance of a penalty notice for disorder. (223502)

There are no plans to increase the financial penalty arising from the issue of a PND, at present.

Under the PND Scheme, the police can issue a fixed penalty of £50 or £80 for a specified range of anti-social behaviour offences including minor shoplifting and criminal damage. Penalty levels are kept under review.

Community Orders

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the average time between the passing of a sentence for a community order and the defendant’s becoming engaged in the activity or requirement ordered was in each criminal justice area in England and Wales in each of the last five years for which figures are available. (223516)

National Standards for the Management of Offenders require that community orders begin in a timely manner and this is monitored by Probation Areas. Full year data are only available for 2006-07 and 2007-08 in relation to the start of unpaid work, drug rehabilitation and specific activity requirements are shown in tables 1 and 2. National Standards state that these requirements commence within 10 working days, two working days and 15 working days respectively.

In respect of all community orders, with the exception of stand alone curfew and attendance centre requirements, offender managers are required to initiate contact with offenders within five working days of sentence. The extent to which this was achieved by probation areas during 2007-08 and 2006-071 is shown in tables 3 and 4.

Figures relating to the start of community orders are not available for each criminal justice area, but are instead broken down by probation areas. The tables2 provide a summary of National Standards monitoring in 2007-08 and 2006-071.

National Standard requirements may not be met in some occasions as a result of operational pressures within probation areas or as a result of offenders failing to report as instructed.

1 Full year data is unavailable prior to this period.

2 Figures are extracted from large scale administrative systems, which may be subject to data input errors.

Table 1: Unpaid work requirements, drug testing and treatment orders/drug rehabilitation requirements and specific activity requirements 2007-08

Percentage of unpaid work requirements commenced within 10 working days

Percentage of drug testing and treatment orders/drug rehabilitation requirements commenced within two working days

Percentage of specified activity requirements commenced within 15 working days

Probation area

Number of cases in sample

Percentage of cases commenced within 10 w/days

Number of cases in sample

Percentage of cases commenced within two w/days

Number of cases in sample

Percentage of cases commenced within 15 w/days

Avon and Somerset

246

53

40

68

36

56

Bedfordshire

165

79

30

63

9

56

Cambridgeshire

163

61

24

54

21

48

Cheshire

315

72

35

66

5

80

County Durham

156

89

26

65

11

64

Cumbria

247

85

21

76

0

Derbyshire

276

66

83

86

29

76

Devon and Cornwall

327

77

109

68

5

60

Dorset

151

83

14

71

20

65

Dyfed Powys

122

87

27

70

0

Essex

455

77

38

47

64

64

Gloucestershire

107

69

24

71

24

58

Greater Manchester

1,438

75

244

61

10

40

Gwent

208

75

48

65

95

58

Hampshire

598

60

87

63

112

45

Hertfordshire

246

78

19

42

85

33

Humberside

302

72

66

76

66

55

Kent

513

74

46

72

118

58

Lancashire

538

69

107

63

3

33

Leicestershire

456

84

71

85

44

34

Lincolnshire

135

75

39

62

59

31

London

2,202

45

408

48

160

48

Merseyside

525

86

140

78

87

29

Norfolk

289

85

50

74

8

50

North Wales

229

90

37

51

26

56

North Yorkshire

202

83

16

50

69

43

Northamptonshire

285

88

69

86

70

73

Northumbria

511

70

113

80

64

55

Nottinghamshire

402

82

69

86

31

74

South Wales

451

78

64

69

25

56

South Yorkshire

464

84

113

68

17

47

Staffordshire

276

70

104

77

120

32

Suffolk

243

80

27

85

1

0

Surrey

180

86

21

76

3

67

Sussex

456

83

68

72

40

38

Teesside

185

79

54

57

35

63

Thames Valley

651

48

1090

72

Warwickshire

158

71

22

59

22

36

West Mercia

429

77

67

67|

13

62

West Midlands

734

68

193

66

47

47

West Yorkshire

877

82

158

61

15

20

Wiltshire

136

82

22

64

32

66

England and Wales

12,154

71

3,084

66

1,802

50

Table 2: Unpaid work requirements, drug testing and treatment orders/drug rehabilitation requirements and specific activity requirements 2006-07

Percentage of unpaid work requirements commenced within 10 working days

Percentage of drug testing and treatment orders/drug rehabilitation requirements commenced within two working days

Percentage of specified activity requirements commenced within 15 working days

Probation area

Number of cases in sample

Percentage of cases commenced within required 10 w/days

Number of cases in sample

Percentage of cases commenced within two w/days

Number of cases in sample

Percentage of cases commenced within 15 w/days

Avon and Somerset

302

60

69

62

32

53

Bedfordshire

156

62

30

57

13

31

Cambridgeshire

178

56

22

41

17

41

Cheshire

259

75

57

56

9

56

County Durham

171

86

11

64

18

39

Cumbria

188

86

20

70

0

Derbyshire

339

66

75

77

31

48

Devon and Cornwall

368

71

82

63

1

100

Dorset

140

81

18

89

16

81

Dyfed Powys

96

76

28

93

0

Essex

214

51

14

64

32

44

Gloucestershire

105

75

10

80

30

57

Greater Manchester

1,392

80

291

59

11

82

Gwent

201

79

58

79

68

60

Hampshire

575

63

77

73

118

52

Hertfordshire

242

69

34

62

37

43

Humberside

319

74

67

63

49

53

Kent

497

78

55

60

77

77

Lancashire

494

70

119

69

3

67

Leicestershire

443

84

93

83

28

43

Lincolnshire

113

66

50

66

47

40

London

2,359

45

456

51

145

49

Merseyside

504

88

97

72

50

28

Norfolk

265

77

34

62

7

43

North Wales

204

83

24

46

61

36

North Yorkshire

263

82

30

90

67

54

Northamptonshire

163

80

33

73

50

38

Northumbria

448

70

107

57

55

44

Nottinghamshire

419

66

89

72

23

78

South Wales

443

86

64

66

32

66

South Yorkshire

453

78

77

90

13

38

Staffordshire

268

79

83

72

133

38

Suffolk

105

79

8

63

1

0

Surrey

163

88

44

77

2

50

Sussex

376

83

67

73

14

29

Teesside

235

77

47

66

44

61

Thames Valley

605

48

81

51

50

58

Warwickshire

139

68

34

76

16

13

West Mercia

390

70

50

54

15

67

West Midlands

584

46

248

70

81

47

West Yorkshire

762

74

191

61

2

100

Wiltshire

139

78

34

79

14

36

England and Wales

16,082

69

3,178

65

1,512

49

Table 3: First appointment arranged with offender manager within five working days of sentence 2007-08

Probation area

Number of cases in sample

Percentage of cases in which first appointment was arranged with offender manager within five working days

Avon and Somerset

452

83

Bedfordshire

287

95

Cambridgeshire

276

76

Cheshire

549

91

County Durham

346

95

Cumbria

393

94

Derbyshire

365

94

Devon and Cornwall

550

96

Dorset

219

89

Dyfed Powys

247

97

Essex

663

89

Gloucestershire

211

86

Greater Manchester

2,520

96

Gwent

377

95

Hampshire

954

83

Hertfordshire

495

87

Humberside

526

98

Kent

741

97

Lancashire

1,091

95

Leicestershire

720

94

Lincolnshire

260

80

London

3,024

58

Merseyside

964

94

Norfolk

414

97

North Wales

438

95

North Yorkshire

367

96

Northamptonshire

461

96

Northumbria

1,127

94

Nottinghamshire

788

95

South Wales

777

94

South Yorkshire

944

96

Staffordshire

565

87

Suffolk

360

97

Surrey

332

95

Sussex

821

88

Teesside

418

98

Thames Valley

1,027

82

Warwickshire

288

94

West Mercia

801

90

West Midlands

1,657

86

West Yorkshire

1,607

98

Wiltshire

221

87

England and Wales

29,741

89

Table 4: First appointment arranged with offender manager within five working days of sentence 2006-07

Probation area

Number of cases in sample

Percentage of cases in which first appointment was arranged with offender manager within five working days

Avon and Somerset

505

91

Bedfordshire

314

91

Cambridgeshire

263

71

Cheshire

510

89

County Durham

333

97

Cumbria

323

90

Derbyshire

503

93

Devon and Cornwall

605

94

Dorset

217

91

Dyfed Powys

220

96

Essex

327

90

Gloucestershire

218

89

Greater Manchester

2,445

94

Gwent

356

97

Hampshire

823

86

Hertfordshire

467

80

Humberside

542

96

Kent

747

95

Lancashire

960

95

Leicestershire

681

88

Lincolnshire

242

92

London

3,405

57

Merseyside

968

96

Norfolk

415

92

North Wales

379

95

North Yorkshire

416

95

Northamptonshire

294

84

Northumbria

1,051

94

Nottinghamshire

787

94

South Wales

751

93

South Yorkshire

987

90

Staffordshire

569

90

Suffolk

178

96

Surrey

292

87

Sussex

666

89

Teesside

478

93

Thames Valley

977

76

Warwickshire

261

92

West Mercia

685

93

West Midlands

1,420

83

West Yorkshire

1,606

95

Wiltshire

263

85

England and Wales

28,567

87

Crown Prosecution Service

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what steps he plans to take following the comments regarding the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) made by the tribunal in the action brought by Halima Aziz against the CPS. (224203)

I have been asked to reply.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has accepted the recommendations contained in the tribunal’s judgment and is taking steps to implement them. The CPS does not accept certain elements of the judgment in relation to its conduct of the litigation and the internal investigation following the decision of the Court of Appeal. On those elements it is seeking a review and appeal. In light of this continued litigation, it is not appropriate to comment further until the matter is concluded.

Curfews: Monitoring

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice for what reasons his Department decided to put in place arrangements for the remote monitoring of compliance with curfew conditions of certain offenders who have transferred to England and Wales from Scotland, as determined by Schedule 2 of Statutory Instrument No. 1788. (223999)

The Scotland Act 1998 (Agency Arrangements) (Specification) (No 2) Order 2008 is part of the legislative framework which will facilitate the cross border transfer of prisoners. It will allow prisoners serving a prison sentence in Scotland who would be released under the Home Detention Curfew (HDC) scheme there to be released, on a restricted transfer basis, to an address in England or Wales and vice versa.

Officials in my Department and the Scottish Executive are working together to put the contractual arrangements with the electronic monitoring contractors in place to enable full cross border arrangements to come into effect on 20 October 2008.

Departmental Appeals

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice on how many occasions his Department and its predecessor instructed the Treasury Solicitor to seek leave to appeal to the House of Lords from (a) the Court of Appeal and (b) the House of Lords itself in each of the last 10 years; and on how many occasions the application was rejected. (220815)

Neither the Treasury Solicitor nor the Ministry keep central records and we have not been able to identify any cases to which the Minister of Justice, Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs or the Lord Chancellor was a party, where the Treasury Solicitor applied for leave to appeal to the House of Lords and was refused. We cannot, therefore, say whether there were any such cases and, if so, how many.

We are aware that the Court of Appeal granted the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs leave to appeal to the House of Lords in two cases. In one of those cases, the House of Lords gave Secretary of State of Justice permission to appeal.

Departmental Data Protection

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what incidents of data loss by or from his Department there have been since 1 July 2007; and what instructions or protocols there are in his Department to prevent such losses. (224013)

The Ministry of Justice has published details of significant personal data related incidents in 2007-08 in its resource accounts laid before this House on 21 July 2008. For the year 2008-09 to date there has been one significant incident, involving the loss of an inadequately protected storage device from the premises of an IT contractor. Other data losses will be handled at local level and compiling information on these could be done only at disproportionate cost.

I refer the hon. Member to the statement made by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster on 25 June 2008, Official Report, column 26WS, providing the final report on measures for data handling procedures in Government.

The Ministry of Justice has procedures and guidance covering security, information security and data protection designed to identify and control the risk of the unauthorised release of personal data taking place. They include:

Ensuring our sites are physically secure and protected from unauthorised access

Ensuring our employees are reliable through checks on background

Providing guidance to staff on general security with separate guidance on IT security and data protection issues

Procedures for assessing IT systems

We also have systems, for monitoring and checking compliance

These policies and procedures extend to our contracted suppliers.

Departmental Sick Leave

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many staff in his Department have had five or more periods of sickness absence of less than five days in two or more of the last five years; (218970)

(2) how many and what percentage of staff in his Department and its predecessor have had more than two periods of sickness absence of less than five days in each of the last three years.

The Ministry of Justice was created on 9 May 2007 bringing together the former Department for Constitutional Affairs and National Offender Management Service, including the Prison and Probation Services and the Office for Criminal Justice Reform.

Figures for the National Offender Management Service and HM Prison Service were the responsibility of the Home Office until the creation of the Ministry of Justice.

Information for HM Prison Service, the National Offender Management Service and the Office for Criminal Justice Reform are available separately for the year April 2007 to March 2008, however any previous figures are integrated within the Home Office data.

Sickness absence data as held by the former Department for Constitutional Affairs cannot be broken down to the level of detail requested. However, the general trend of sickness levels in the Ministry overall is downwards. Concerted management attention has been given to attendance across the Ministry over the last 18 months and the Q1/2008 average working days lost (AWDL) per employee was 10.4 days—with HMCS 11.3 days and Tribunal Services 8.2 days. The latest working records indicate the year to date sickness levels to July equate to an annualised AWDL of 9.9 days, reflecting the downward trend. It should be noted that 50 per cent. of the absence figure is made up of ‘long-term’ cases where absence is greater than 20 working days.

Within Her Majesty's Prison Service 361 staff have taken five or more periods of sickness absence of less than five days duration in two or more of the years between 2003-04 and 2007-08. An absence of less than five days is defined as an absence where the return to work is less than five days after the first day of absence.

The Ministry is currently developing a new Attendance Management Policy which, subject to remaining consultations with unions, is intended for launch before the end of this calendar year. The introduction of the new policy will upgrade and standardise the procedures for recording absence across the former DCA so that more detailed analysis of attendance trends and case management can be conducted in future.

Staff taking more than two periods of sick absence of less than five days duration

Staff taking more than 2 periods of sick absence of less than 5 days duration

Percentage of staff in post

2007-08

HM Prison Service

3,114

6.2

National Offender Management Service and the Office for Criminal Justice Reform

172

10.0

Former DCA

1—

2006-07

HM Prison Service

3,531

7.2

National Offender Management Service and the Office for Criminal Justice Reform

Included in Home Office Figures

Former DCA

-1

2005-06

HM Prison Service

3,749

7.7

National Offender Management Service and the Office for Criminal Justice Reform

Included in Home Office Figures

Former DCA

1—

1 See aforementioned note: data not available at this level of detail

Domestic Violence

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the answer of 22 July, Official Report, column 1217W, on domestic violence, how many people have commenced, but not completed, the CDVP and IDAP programmes; and how many people ordered to attend a domestic violence programme have failed to (a) commence and (b) complete such a programme. (224209)

Information on delivery of the CDVP (Community Domestic Violence Programme) and IDAP (Integrated Domestic Abuse Programme) is given in the following table. These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system.

2007-081, 2, 3

Number enrolled3

4,927

Number commenced

4,388

Failure to commence

539

Number of completion

2,800

Failure to complete (of enrolled)

1,588

1 Data subject to occasional updating.

2 Reassignment to programmes, leads to some multiple starts per offender.

3 Equivalent to “ordered”.

Legal Services Commission: Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what expenditure his Department incurred on bonuses for the Legal Services Commission's (a) Executive Team, (b) staff and (c) directors in the last two years. (224015)

As a non-departmental public body, the Legal Services Commission (LSC) is responsible for its own administrative budget which includes staff pay. The Ministry of Justice and HM Treasury approve the LSC’s annual pay remit. The expenditure incurred by the LSC as bonuses is shown in the following table.

£000

2007-08

2006-07

Executive team

137,000

95,000

Staff other than the executive team and directors

685,000

416,000

Directors

168,000

146,000

Bonuses paid relate to performance for the previous financial year. A breakdown of bonuses paid to individual executive team members in the past two years is shown in remuneration reports contained within the LSC's annual reports for 2007-08 and 2006-07, which can be found at:

www.legalservices.gov.uk.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice if he will remove any bonuses paid to the staff at the Legal Services Commission involved with setting up community legal advice centres and community legal advice networks. (224016)

Bonus payments for senior LSC staff (Executive Directors and directors) are determined by the achievement of shared and individual objectives which are linked to the LSC's corporate priorities as set out in its corporate/strategic plans. This approach means that bonus payments are made only when a corporate target or priority is achieved. The LSC's performance against its targets is reported on its annual reports, (available at www.legalservices.gov.uk).

For staff below director level, the LSC operates a performance related non-consolidated bonus system. Non-consolidated bonuses are usually used to target one-off in-year contributions that are particularly significant but unlikely to be repeated and are therefore not something that the LSC would pay for year on year.

Any bonuses paid to staff at the LSC involved with setting up community legal advice centres and community legal advice networks would have been paid in accordance with the criteria set out above.

National Offender Management Information System: Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how much his Department and its predecessors spent on the procurement, development and commissioning of the IT system, C-NOMIS, in each of the financial years 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. (224011)

The expenditure on C-NOMIS was £56 million in 2005-06 (including a small proportion incurred in earlier years), £69 million in 2006-07 and £52 million in 2007-08.

Until December 2007, the active element of the NOMIS Programme was C-NOMIS. From January 2008, following a strategic review, C-NOMIS became Prison NOMIS, one of the projects in the revised NOMIS Programme.

National Offender Management Service: Buildings

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how much his Department has spent on the development of the National Offender Management Service’s Headquarters to date. (224012)

As at the end of July 2008, a total of £699,000 had been spent on the development of the National Offender Management Service headquarters. This is not additional expenditure but a re-allocation of existing resources to this very important programme of work. £232,000 relates to permanent staff which have been seconded to the programme in either project management or subject matter expert roles, but their substantive roles have not been filled. £467,000 covers the use of specialist IT and consultancy support, predominantly using resources from the agency IT provider.

The first phase of the programme covers the fundamental merger type aspects of transferring staff into the Headquarters, Areas and Regions of the NOMS agency and the associated issues around their terms and conditions, accommodation needs, IT requirements and the necessary transfer of data from Home Office to NOMS. The programme then consists mainly of an organisation design phase where the structures will be designed to be fit-for-purpose to meet the financial and operational challenges to March 2011.

PA Consulting

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what contracts his Department has with PA Consulting; and what the (a) estimated value and (b) expected duration of each such contract is. (224008)

The information requested regarding the Ministry of Justice’s current contracts with PA Consulting is shown in the following table.

Ministry of Justice: current PA contracts

Business group/details of contract

Date

Cost (£)

National Offender Management Service (NOMS)

Workforce Reform Management Consulting

1. July to December 2008

1424,000

2. September 2008 to March 2009

1

NOMIS (a single interactive database underpinning the reform programme in NOMS by supporting end-to-end offender management)

(a) Commercial advice to the NOMIS project

March to October 2008

(a) 338,000

(b) Consultancy on Probation Case Management System

August to October 2008

(b) 49,000

ICT Group

Technical Design Authority

January to November 2008

590,000

Access to Justice

Confiscation Order Support 2008/09

Apr 2008 to March 2009

299,000

Hearing Centre Standard

June to December 2008

499,000

Operating Model and Administrative Support Centre Design

Assurance Programme

August 2008 to February 2009

106,000

Corporate Performance Group

MOJ Transition Strategy, Planning and Performance, Change Programme

April to September 2008

143,000

Democracy Constitution and Law

Change Management framework

December 2007 to December 2008

499,500

OCJR

Virtual Courts Evaluation Framework

July to September 2008

42,000

Political Parties: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether Electoral Commission guidance on trigger rules associated with the Political Parties and Elections Bill will be subject to delegated legislation procedures. (224081)

The Political Parties and Elections Bill provides that the Electoral Commission may give guidance on triggering (clause 11 of the Bill). This guidance would form part of the code of practice on candidate spending definitions which the Commission has been empowered to produce since the Electoral Administration Act 2006 inserted provision into paragraph 14 of schedule 4A of the Representation of the People Act 1983. Under that provision, any code of practice produced by the Commission must be submitted to the Secretary of State for approval. It must then be laid before Parliament by the Secretary of State (unmodified, or with his explanation of the modifications he has made to it). Parliament then has 40 days to annul the draft if it chooses to do so, and if no such resolution is made, the code shall be published by the Commission to take effect on a date appointed by the Secretary of State.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether the provisions within the Political Parties and Elections Bill on the introduction of new trigger rules will apply to candidates for election to the (a) European Parliament, (b) London Assembly, (c) post of London Mayor, (d) Welsh Assembly (e) Scottish Parliament, (f) Northern Ireland Assembly and (g) posts of directly elected mayors in local authorities; and what plans he has to include mechanisms to apply such provisions to future elected assemblies in the UK. (224082)

No. The changes that re-introduce triggering will apply to candidates at general elections only, as described in the Explanatory Notes to the Political Parties and Elections Bill.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether the provisions within the Political Parties and Elections Bill on the introduction of new trigger rules are intended to apply to local campaign expenditure by hon. Members who are reselected as candidates by their local association prior to the dissolution of Parliament; and whether the trigger rules will apply to Communications Allowance expenditure by hon. Members in their constituencies. (224083)

Incumbent Members of Parliament seeking re-election will be subject to the new regulations governing candidate expenditure in the same way as non-MPs. The date of Dissolution of Parliament, or adoption as a candidate (whichever is later) will no longer be the determining factor as to when the candidate spending limits contained in section 76 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 start to apply in a parliamentary general election.

Once the provisions in the Political Parties and Elections Bill take effect, those limits will apply to any spending for the purposes of the candidate’s election on the matters set out in schedule 4A of the Representation of the People Act 1983, whenever it is incurred.

MPs receive parliamentary allowances to enable them to fulfil their duties as an MP. The Communications Allowance is provided to MPs to enable them to communicate proactively with their constituents and inform them about their parliamentary duties. The rules governing use of the Communications Allowance are very clear: the allowance must not be used for personal benefit or for party political campaigning. Provided the allowance is used in accordance with parliamentary rules, this means that expenditure of it would not trigger the candidate spending restrictions. Changes to the rules governing use of the Communications Allowance, further strengthening the prohibition on spending for political purposes, were approved by this House in July, and will come into force in spring 2009.

Prisoners

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what his most recent estimate is of the effect of the size of the prison population on levels of crime. (223443)

Since 1997, the prison population has increased by 35 per cent. (from 61,500 in June 1997 to 83,200 in June 2008). Crime as measured by the British crime survey has decreased by 39 per cent. (2007-08 compared to 1997). As I have said on a number of occasions it is highly probable there is a link between these two trends, but there are no reliable estimates of the precise connection. Crime levels are affected by a range of factors, including demographic, social economic, crime prevention measures (for example, ‘target handling’ of premises and vehicles), more effective policing, the use of modern techniques (including CCTV) and the area crime reduction approach adopted by local authorities and communities. There is no accepted methodology for disaggregating these factors, either here or abroad. Some further information is available in the “Managing Offenders, Reducing Crime” report December 2003 by Lord Carter, and in “Modelling Crime Reduction” (Home Office online report 38/04).

Prisoners: Females

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many and what proportion of female prisoners he estimates have experienced (a) domestic violence, (b) sexual abuse and (c) mental illness in each of the last five years. (224098)

The National Offender Management Service and the Department of Health do not routinely keep information on the number of female prisoners who have experienced domestic violence, sexual abuse and/or mental illness. The findings from research indicate that up to half of women in prison may have experienced domestic violence; that up to a third may have been victims of sexual abuse; and that four fifths have diagnosable mental health problems.

Reoffenders

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many offenders (a) released from prisons and (b) who completed community sentences had already served one or more (i) custodial and (ii) community sentence, broken down by the number of previous sentences, in England and Wales in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available. (223515)

The requested information is not available. However, published statistics on reoffending include information on offenders who have completed their prison sentence or began a community sentence for the 1st quarter of 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. These statistics show the number of previous custodial sentences and the number of previous convictions.

The following table shows how many offenders (released from prisons or commencing community sentences) had received at least one previous custodial sentence broken down by the number of previous custodial sentences

Offenders released from prison

Offenders commencing court orders

Number previous custodial sentences

2000 Q1

5,662

18,607

2002 Q1

5,140

18,318

2003 Q1

4,616

18,621

2004 Q1

4,779

19,272

2005 Q1

4,511

18,222

2006 Q1

4,647

22,687

One previous custodial sentence

2000 Q1

2,478

3,689

2002 Q1

2,345

3,699

2003 Q1

2,042

4,034

2004 Q1

2,235

4,060

2005 Q1

2,000

3,591

2006 Q1

1,931

4,322

Between two and five previous custodial sentences

2000 Q1

4,614

4,696

2002 Q1

4,742

4,874

2003 Q1

4,340

5,369

2004 Q1

4,763

5,500

2005 Q1

4,320

5,038

2006 Q1

4,017

6,137

Between six and 10 previous custodial sentences

2000 Q1

2,044

1,415

2002 Q1

2,182

1,555

2003 Q1

2,194

1,975

2004 Q1

2,530

2,038

2005 Q1

2,258

1,957

2006 Q1

2,201

2,377

More than 10 previous custodial sentences

2000 Q1

929

452

2002 Q1

1,169

568

2003 Q1

1,166

758

2004 Q1

1,454

850

2005 Q1

1,506

920

2006 Q1

1,584

1,254

The following table shows how many offenders (released from prisons or commencing community sentences) had received at least one previous court conviction broken down by the number of previous convictions.

Offenders released from prison

Offenders commencing court orders

Number previous convictions

2000 Q1

1,475

6,062

2002 Q1

1,353

6,047

2003 Q1

1,322

5,655

2004 Q1

1,416

5,831

2005 Q1

1,409

5,592

2006 Q1

1,576

7,111

One previous conviction

2000 Q1

1,047

3,758

2002 Q1

874

3,557

2003 Q1

790

3,701

2004 Q1

857

3,834

2005 Q1

817

3,662

2006 Q1

814

4,569

Between two and five previous convictions

2000 Q1

3,601

8,418

2002 Q1

3,201

8,251

2003 Q1

2,785

8,549

2004 Q1

2,903

8,792

2005 Q1

2,645

7,944

2006 Q1

2,660

9,857

Between six and 10 previous convictions

2000 Q1

3,557

5,070

2002 Q1

3,667

5,187

2003 Q1

3,133

5,693

2004 Q1

3,211

5,601

2005 Q1

2,940

5,194

2006 Q1

2,680

6,068

More than 10 previous convictions

2000 Q1

6,047

5,551

2002 Q1

6,483

5,972

2003 Q1

6,328

7,159

2004 Q1

7,374

7,662

2005 Q1

6,784

7,336

2006 Q1

6,650

9,172

Shoplifting

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many people (a) were cautioned for, (b) received a penalty notice for disorder relating to and (c) were convicted of shoplifting in 2007; (224102)

(2) how many penalty notices for disorder were issued in 2007, broken down by (a) offence committed and (b) police force area.

The information requested for 2007 will be available when it is published at the end of November 2008.

Women’s Prisons: Crimes of Violence

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many violent incidents have been recorded in women's prisons over the last five years; and how many assaults on staff have been recorded in women's prisons in that time. (224097)

The term ‘violent incident’ is not used in the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) data. The nearest equivalent to ‘violent incidents’ in NOMS data is incidents of assault. Information on incidents of assault is set out in the following table but is subject to important qualifications. Assault data cover a range of behaviour and may include threatening behaviour, projection of bodily fluids, other non-contact incidents and allegations. Information on assault incidents may involve more than one assailant or more than one victim. In a proportion of incidents only the victim is known.

The Prison Service incident reporting system processes high volumes of data which are constantly being updated. The numbers provide an indication of overall numbers but should not be interpreted as absolute.

Assaults in women's prisons over the past five years

Number

2003

521

2004

566

2005

637

2006

697

2007

658

Note:

The numbers supplied refer to the number of individual assault incidents.

Assaults on staff in women's prisons over the past five years

Assault information is recorded at establishment level where it is categorised into one of four categories: prisoner on prisoner, prisoner on officer, prisoner on other and other (including assaults or allegations of assault by non prisoners). The recorded incidents of assaults on prison officers are not completely exclusive to officers; establishment recording sometimes includes assaults on other prison staff in this category. The category prisoner on other contains few entries but these may include prison staff as well as visitors, legal visitors etc. This reply combines prisoner on officer and prisoner on other data categories.

Number

2003

214

2004

208

2005

257

2006

314

2007

270

Women’s Prisons: Equipment

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what his policy is on the routine carrying of batons by prison officers in women's prisons. (224095)

Current Prison Service policy is that batons are not routinely carried by prison officers in the women’s estate, the young people’s estate or the open estate. However, they may be used in these areas as part of planned interventions by control and restraint teams in response to very serious incidents of disorder. The review into the use of batons in the women’s and open estate is currently under way.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the recommendations were of the review on the use of batons in women’s prisons; if he will place in the Library a copy of the conclusions of the review; and what alternatives are under examination to address violence in women’s prisons other than equipping staff with batons. (224096)

The review into the use of batons in the women’s and open estates is under way and due to report at the end of the year. A copy of the report of the review will be placed in the Library on its conclusion. A number of accredited programmes for women have been developed, or are in advanced stages of development, which are appropriate to violence reduction in the women’s estate.

Northern Ireland

Departmental ICT

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what information technology projects initiated by his Department have been cancelled prior to completion in the last five years; and what the cost of each such project was to the public purse. (221707)

In the last five years no information technology projects initiated by the Northern Ireland Office have been cancelled prior to completion.

Homicide

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many persons were killed by a current or former partner in (a) A District Command Unit area, (b) B District Command Unit area and (c) Northern Ireland in each of the last 10 years, broken down by (i) sex and (ii) age of victim. (207760)

The Chief Constable has provided the following answer:

The following tables detail the number of recorded murders with a domestic motivation as requested for the period 2004-05 to 2007-08. Figures prior to 2004 were counted and categorised according to Home Office Counting Rules, therefore any crime figures with domestic motivations from 2004-05 onwards are not comparable with those collected in previous years.

Recorded crimes with a domestic motivation: Offences of Murder1 A and B Districts and Northern Ireland 2004-05 to 2007-08

2004-05

District

Number of murders

Age/Gender of victim

Clearance Method

A

1

One Female age 17 and over

One Charge/summons

B

2

Two Female age 17 and over

One Charge/summons; one died before proceedings

NI Total

7

Six Female age 17 and over; one Male age 17 and over

Five Charge/summons; two died before proceedings

Source:

Central Statistics Unit, PSNI

2005-06

District

Number of murders

Age/Gender of victim

Clearance Method

A

0

B

1

One Female age 17 and over

One Charge/summons

NI Total

2

One Female age 17 and over; one Male age 17 and over

Two Charge/summons

Source:

Central Statistics Unit, PSNI

2006-07

District

Number of murders

Age/Gender of victim

Clearance Method

A

0

B

0

NI Total

1

One Male age 17 and over

One Charge/summons

Source:

Central Statistics Unit, PSNI

2007-08

District

Number of murders1

Age/Gender of victim

Clearance Method

A

0

-

-

B

0

-

-

NI Total

3

Two Female age 17 and over; one Male age 17 and over

Two Charge/summons; one Died before proceedings

1 The figures include those murders where the relationship identified was spouse -wife, spouse - husband, common law wife, common law husband, boyfriend, girlfriend (this is the terminology used in PSNI crime recording system). It also includes where the offence resulted in a clearance method of charge/summons or offender died before proceedings.

Source:

Central Statistics Unit, PSNI

Speed Limits: Cameras

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many Police Service of Northern Ireland speed camera operations were carried out in each District Command Unit area in each of the last 12 months; and how much accrued from fines arising from these operations in each area over the same period. (220388)

The Chief Constable has provided the following response:

Table 1: Number of speed camera operations and detections April 2007 to March 2008

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

District

Number of camera operations

Number of detections

Number of camera 0perations

Number of detections

Number of camera operations

Number of detections

Number of camera operations

Number of detections

A

42

24

37

37

32

12

11

21

B

36

44

32

24

24

9

18

25

C

44

72

59

197

68

246

80

211

D

7

0

11

0

5

1

6

5

E

23

359

19

328

17

254

22

278

F

1

27

34

358

27

341

28

196

G

7

85

29

155

29

154

35

204

H

22

89

17

85

23

211

30

143

August 2007September 2007October 2007November 2007

District

Number of camera operations

Number of detections

Number of camera 0perations

Number of detections

Number of camera operations

Number of detections

Number of camera operations

Number of detections

A

27

9

19

13

34

31

10

0

B

25

20

39

30

28

11

30

11

C

75

250

60

124

66

181

75

182

D

6

0

11

5

10

0

10

1

E

17

320

23

327

13

224

20

207

F

36

354

38

281

28

239

22

159

G

37

235

29

215

38

255

22

114

H

35

187

13

76

26

123

33

134

December 2007January 2008February 2008March 2008

District

Number of camera operations

Number of detections

Number of camera 0perations

Number of detections

Number of camera operations

Number of detections

Number of camera operations

Number of detections

A

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

B

8

9

20

4

6

2

26

28

C

30

132

42

66

38

51

56

126

D

3

1

21

3

6

3

5

0

E

16

237

28

312

21

261

22

482

F

48

242

30

126

26

151

31

167

G

24

158

28

131

29

288

40

178

H

29

145

16

40

34

90

26

89

Table 2: Total detections and revenue in financial year 2007-08

District

Total number of camera operations

Total number of detections

Revenue total (£)

A

213

147

7,200

B

292

217

10,080

C

693

1,838

96,300

D

101

19

2,940

E

241

3,589

161,100

F

349

2,641

94,560

G

347

2,172

95,400

H

304

1,412

68,400

Total

2,540

12,035

535,980

Note:

Detections in any given year may not be directly related to revenue due to:

motorists having up to 4 months in which to pay from detection;

if case heard in court revenue not collected by PSNI; and

small number of cases may be cancelled.