Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 481: debated on Thursday 23 October 2008

Written Answers to Questions

Thursday 23 October 2008

Wales

Departmental ICT

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what IT projects his Department is undertaking; and what the most recent estimate of (a) the cost and (b) the completion date of each is. (229173)

Departmental Official Visits

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how much was spent on overnight accommodation by his Department’s civil servants in the last 12 months. (228784)

In the last 12 months my Department has spent £24,875 on overnight accommodation for civil servants.

Departmental Older Workers

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many people aged over (a) 55 and (b) 60 years were recruited by his Department in 2007-08; and what percentage in each case this was of the number of new recruits. (228741)

The Wales Office does not require applicants for its posts to provide their dates of birth.

This information is therefore not held in the format requested and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

The Wales Office has a number of staff in post that are above the ages of (a) 55 and (b) 60 respectively.

Electoral Commission Committee

Electoral Fraud

7. To ask the hon. Member for Gosport, representing the Speaker’s Committee on the Electoral Commission what recent discussions the Committee has had with the Electoral Commission on its role in preventing electoral fraud. (229210)

The Speaker’s Committee meets the Electoral Commission regularly to discuss the full range of its activities, including its important work to prevent electoral fraud.

The Commission informs me that it continues to issue detailed guidance and works with returning officers, electoral registration officers, political parties, the Crown Prosecution Service and the police on strategies for preventing and detecting electoral malpractice. The Commission also continues to call for the introduction of individual electoral registration.

Northern Ireland

Departmental Marketing

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what assessment he has made of the cost effectiveness of Government-commissioned advertising in the last 12 months relating to matters falling within the remit of his Department. (226513)

Expenditure on Government- commissioned advertising is included within the framework of the Northern Ireland Office’s procurement policy which aims to achieve “best value for money” in the procurement of goods and services over the lifetime of a contract. This allows wider policy objectives to be considered in the procurement process so that it meets the tests of need, affordability and cost-effectiveness and complies with the UK’s EC and international obligations.

Church Commissioners

Metal Theft

6. To ask the hon. Member for Middlesbrough, representing the Church Commissioners what recent representations the Church Commissioners have received on the levels of theft of lead, copper and other materials from church roofs; and if he will make a statement. (229209)

None. However, the Archbishops Council continues to work with parishes and dioceses, insurers and the police to try to solve this serious problem. By way of a statement, churches not only have to replace the stolen metals; they also have to contend with damage to masonry and timber, and other problems caused by leaking rainwater. It is a serious problem which the Church is working hard to solve.

Bats

8. To ask the hon. Member for Middlesbrough, representing the Church Commissioners what estimate the Commissioners have made of the number of cases of damage to historic churches caused by bats. (229211)

The Church of England does not hold such figures centrally but I know that the damage and hygiene issues caused by bats remain a concern for some parishes and the Archbishops Council continues to discuss it with other relevant parties.

Transport

Departmental Civil Service Agencies

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many agencies were sponsored by his Department in (a) 2007-08 and (b) 1997-98. (228502)

The ‘Next Steps Report 1997’ (Cm 3889) provides information on all executive agencies as at 31 December 1997. Copies are available from the Library of the House. The present Department for Transport was established in 2002. The most up-to-date list of executive agencies is published in the Cabinet Office publication ‘The List of Ministerial Responsibilities’. The latest version, incorporating recent ministerial changes, will be published shortly. Copies will be placed in the Libraries of the House.

M1: Repairs and Maintenance

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport for what reason fencing is being erected adjacent to the southbound carriageway south of junction 8 of the M1; and what the cost is of such fencing. (226274)

The fencing to the south of junction 8 of the M1 is an environmental barrier and is a public inquiry commitment. 900 m of 3 m high barrier is being provided to reduce the visual impact to properties on the eastern side of the motorway.

The cost of installing the fencing is £288,000.

Public Transport

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what official visits he and his immediate predecessor undertook using public transport in the last 12 months. (228938)

My predecessor undertook 14 official visits using public transport in the last 12 months to the following locations: Ashford, Manchester (three times), Birmingham (three times), Heathrow Airport (twice), Bradford, Derby (twice), Brussels and La Rochelle. I have, so far, undertaken one, to Luxembourg. Her travel, and mine, will be undertaken by the most efficient and cost-effective means possible, in line with the provisions of the Ministerial Code.

Public Transport: Concessions

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the timescale is for research to be carried out on the way concessionary travel is administered; who has been commissioned to undertake the research; what methodology will be followed by the researchers; and whom they intend to consult. (229073)

The Department for Transport has commissioned WS Atkins and the Institute for Transport Studies (ITS) in Leeds university to carry out research into concessionary fares reimbursement. This work should be completed by the end of 2009. The research will explore the latest evidence on the number of extra trips generated by the free national scheme, the revenue foregone by bus operators and the additional costs. The researchers will work closely with bus operators and local authorities, other stakeholders and academics.

Work and Pensions

Disabled

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many and what proportion of staff in (a) his Department and (b) the executive agencies for which he is responsible are disabled; and what the average salary in his (i) Department and (ii) executive agencies is of (A) full-time disabled staff, (B) full-time non-disabled staff, (C) part-time disabled staff and (D) part-time non-disabled staff. (220179)

I refer the hon. Member to the reply given by my hon. Friend the Member for West Bromwich, East (Mr. Watson), the Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office, on 8 October 2008, Official Report, columns 651-52W.

Income Support: Disabled

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many new claims for income support on the grounds of incapacity for work for which the claimant did not qualify for the disability premium through income support were awarded to (a) single persons aged under 35, (b) single persons aged 35 to 44, (c) single persons aged 35 to 65, (d) couples with a claimant aged under 35, (e) couples with a claimant aged 35 to 44 and (f) couples with a claimant aged 35 to 65, in the last 12 months for which figures are available. (224157)

National Insurance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) how many national insurance numbers were issued to dependants of work permit holders in each year from 2002 to 2007; (227448)

(2) how many national insurance numbers have been issued to dependants of work permit holders in 2008.

Winter Fuel Payments

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions which areas are covered by each weather station used to assess the temperature for the purpose of cold weather payments. (226184)

Under the cold weather payment scheme, every residential postcode is linked to one of 76 weather stations. I have placed a table of the list of the weather stations used to collect information in order to assess entitlement to cold weather payments and the linked postcode districts in the Library.

Solicitor-General

Fraud

To ask the Solicitor-General what criteria are applied by the (a) Serious Fraud Office and (b) Fraud Prosecution Service to determine whether to accept a case. (229420)

The key criterion used by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) when deciding whether to accept a case is that the suspected fraud appears to be so serious or complex that its investigation should be carried out by those responsible for its prosecution.

Other factors taken into consideration when deciding whether to accept a case are as follows:

Whether the value of the alleged fraud exceeds £1 million;

If the case has a significant international dimension;

If the case is likely to be of widespread public concern;

If the case requires highly specialised knowledge. For example, of financial markets;

If there is a need to use the SFO's special powers, such as section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act.

The SFO could not—and does not—take on every referred case of suspected fraud. SFO resources must be focused on major and complicated fraud. Cases which do not meet the SFO's case acceptance criteria may be referred to other authorities for investigation and prosecution.

The Fraud Prosecution Service (FPS), which prosecutes fraud cases throughout England and Wales, accepts cases which meet one or more of the following criteria: the allegations involve a loss, or risk of loss, of more than £750,000; there is national publicity and/or widespread public concern; highly specialised knowledge is required; a significant element of the case involves inquiries in a foreign jurisdiction.

Defence

Armed Forces

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many Gibraltarians are serving in the UK armed forces in Afghanistan and Iraq. (229131)

Deployment figures are currently provided at aggregate levels based on manual returns which do not record the nationality of personnel. They are not available in central individual level databases. As such this information could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Army: Conditions of Employment

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what representations he has received on the provisions of the Army Terms of Service (Amendment etc.) Regulations 2008, with reference to young people serving for four years beyond their 18th birthday; and if he will make a statement. (228571)

The Army Terms of Service (Amendment etc.) Regulations 2008 came into effect on 6 August 2008. The regulations brought the minimum commitment period for under 18 soldiers back into line with the provisions that existed prior to 1 January 2008, i.e. that they should serve for a minimum of four years from their 18th birthday.

The Department has received one enquiry from an independent researcher with an interest in armed forces recruitment questioning the rationale behind the regulations.

Ballistic Missile Defence

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what direct running costs the UK has incurred to date in the use of RAF Menwith Hill and RAF Fylingdales in the US Missile Defence System. (228389)

Running costs at RAF Menwith Hill and RAF Fylingdales associated with the US Missile Defence System are not identified separately from other functions of the station. We do not anticipate the direct running costs incurred by the UK will increase because of the participation of these stations in the US ballistic missile defence system.

China: Armed Forces

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 17 September 2008, Official Report, columns 2250-1W, on armed forces: training, when his Department’s bilateral programme with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army started; what the terms of the programme are; what other activities (a) have taken place and (b) are planned to take place under the programme; how much funding has been allocated for the programme in the next 12 months; and if he will place in the Library a copy of the bilateral programme agreement. (228567)

[holding answer 20 October 2008]: The MOD’s limited bilateral programme with China has been developing on a gradual basis since the then Prime Minister visited China in October 1998. The terms of the programme are: to maintain consistency with HMG policy and international restrictions; to limit the scope of activity; to ensure in-country control through oversight by the UK Defence Attaché, and; to conduct regular policy review. Activities include senior leadership engagement, high-level command and staff training, junior leadership training, low-level military training, exercises (observing), disaster management training, peace support operations training, benefits to the wider military and civil communities and sport. The total amount of funding allocated in support of the programme for financial year 2008-09 is £464.5,000, of which £177,000 comes from the Conflict Prevention Pool. Our complete UK/China bi-lateral programme for FY 2008-09 is subject to continuing discussion, but is expected to comprise a series of high level visits, an annual programming meeting, short term training teams and courses (including English language training) related to Peace Support Operations, a small number of places for Chinese students in defence education establishments, and limited short term exchanges of service personnel.

I am withholding a copy of the bilateral programme agreement as its release would, or would be likely to prejudice international relations.

Cluster Munitions

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans the Government have to ratify the Convention on cluster munitions within the next 12 months. (228737)

The UK plans to sign the Convention when it opens for signature on 3 December 2008 in Oslo and will ratify as soon as feasible after that date.

Departmental Public Relations

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the cost was of (a) entertainment, (b) advertising and promotion and (c) public relations consultancy to his Department in 2007-08. (228143)

Expenditure in 2007-08 by the MOD, including the armed forces on the items listed was:

(a) Hospitality and entertainment—£4.2 million. We report this expenditure in our Annual Report and Accounts each year.

(b) Advertising and public relations—£46.3 million. This represents the cost of public relations services (including sales marketing and advertising), Service and civilian recruitment expenses and expenditure on schools and community relations initiatives.

(c) The level of expenditure on public relations consultancy is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. A summary of MOD’s 2007-08 expenditure on external assistance (which includes public relations consultancy) has been placed in the Library of the House.

The figures quoted do not include expenditure for the MOD Trading Funds which lie outside the Department’s accounting boundary.

All expenditure is subject to audit and the principles set out in Managing Public Money and the Treasury handbook on Regularity and Propriety.

Gulf of Aden: Piracy

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what contribution the UK is making to efforts to combat piracy in the Gulf of Aden; and if he will make a statement. (225603)

The Government's stance on piracy has recently been reviewed. This has resulted in a move to a more proactive posture whereby Royal Navy (RN) units in the region will actively seek out pirates, and we have issued them with more robust guidance to deal with any pirates encountered. The RN will contribute to counter-piracy operations through three international efforts:

The UK is already engaged in efforts to combat acts of piracy off Somalia, through the Combined Task Force (CTF) 150, which has established a Maritime Security Patrol Area (MSPA) in the Gulf of Aden. CTF 150 units in this area, including RN vessels, are actively conducting operations to counter destabilising activities primarily aimed at deterring and disrupting acts of piracy;

Standing NATO Maritime Group 2, including attached RN units, will also be deploying to the region with a mandate which allows them to conduct counter-piracy operations from mid-October. NATO is considering the ways in which this mandate can be implemented including the escorting of World Food Programme shipping into port in Mogadishu; and

We have also supported EU planning for a counter-piracy naval operation off the coast of Somalia, and on 14 October the EU Political and Security Committee decided to accept the offer made by the UK to provide the Operation Commander (Rear Admiral Phil Jones) and the Operation HQ (the Multinational Headquarters at Northwood). A formal decision from the EU member states to allow planning for the operation to proceed to the next stage is expected in the coming days. The UK offer is subject to sufficient forces being generated for an operation likely to begin in December.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether he plans to discontinue the Royal Navy role in the Combined Task Force 150 in anti-piracy patrols in the Gulf of Aden; and if he will make a statement. (226281)

There are currently no plans to discontinue the Royal Navy’s support to Combined Task Force (CTF) 150 countering destabilising activity including piracy in the region. Rather, the Royal Navy’s response to piracy in the region is being strengthened.

The Government’s stance on piracy has recently been reviewed. This has resulted in a move to a more proactive posture where Royal Navy (RN) units in the region will actively seek out pirates, and we have issued them with more robust guidance to deal with any pirates encountered. The RN will contribute to counter-piracy operations through three international efforts:

continued support to CTF 150, which has established a Maritime Security Patrol Area (MSPA) in the Gulf of Aden; standing NATOMaritime Group 2, including attached RN units, will also be deploying to the region with a mandate which allows them to conduct counter-piracy operations from mid-October. NATO is considering the ways in which this mandate can be implemented including the escorting of World Food Programme shipping into port in Mogadishu; and

we have also supported EU planning for a counter-piracy naval operation off the coast of Somalia, and on 14 October the EU Political and Security Committee decided to accept the offer made by the UK to provide the Operation Commander (Rear Admiral Phil Jones) and the Operation HQ (the Multinational Headquarters at Northwood). A formal decision from the EU member states to allow planning for the operation to proceed to the next stage is expected in the coming days. The UK offer is subject to sufficient forces being generated for an operation likely to begin in December.

Nuclear Disarmament

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what steps the Government is taking to promote multilateral nuclear disarmament. (228112)

The UK plays an active role in all international forums and treaties related to multilateral nuclear disarmament. In particular, we are working to reinforce and strengthen the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. We are pressing for the start of negotiation without pre-conditions in the Conference on Disarmament on a Fissile Material Cut-Off treaty and we continue to call all on all States that have not yet ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty to do so, especially those nine for which entry into force is required.

We are also playing a leading and innovative role in several new initiatives. Along with Norway and the non-governmental organisation VERTIC, we are undertaking research into possible technologies which may be of potential use in any future multilateral disarmament treaty or regime. We have offered to host a confidence building and technical conference between the five Nuclear Weapon States to discuss the issues surrounding multilateral nuclear disarmament. We have co-sponsored a major report by the International Institute for Strategic Studies on the technical and political requirements for a world free of nuclear weapons published in August 2008.

Ottawa Convention

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what further steps the Government intends to take in order to meet the obligations of Article 5 of the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty. (228572)

The Joint Feasibility Study that we carried out with Argentina into de-mining in the Falkland Islands, completed in October 2007, concluded that clearance is technically possible but it will present significant challenges and risks.

We therefore need to carefully consider how to proceed. The Falkland Islands Government was regularly consulted while the Feasibility Study was being carried out and any future decisions will be made in consultation with the Falkland Islands Government. In compliance with the Convention, we have therefore submitted a request for a 10 year Article 5 extension to our March 2009 clearance deadline. Our request will be considered at the ninth meeting of states parties in November 2008.

In the meantime, in compliance with Article 5 of the Convention, the mined areas are clearly marked, fenced and regularly monitored.

RAF Croughton

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what role RAF Croughton plays in the US missile defence system. (228388)

Somalia: Pirates

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what reports he has received of the recent capture of a Ukrainian ship by pirates in Somali waters; what response he has made to these reports; and if he will make a statement. (225963)

We are aware that the MV Faina has been hijacked by pirates off the coast of Somalia carrying a cargo of weapons. There is no direct UK interest in this ship; it is Belize flagged, Ukrainian, Latvian and Russian crewed with a Ukrainian cargo. It is being monitored by the US Navy who are keeping us informed. No Royal Navy units are involved in the monitoring of the vessel but we are engaged in counter-piracy more generally in the region.

The Government's stance on piracy has recently been reviewed. This has resulted in a move to a more proactive posture whereby Royal Navy (RN) units in the region will actively seek out pirates, and we have issued them with more robust guidance to deal with any pirates encountered. The RN will contribute to counter-piracy operations through three international efforts:

The UK is already engaged in efforts to combat acts of piracy off Somalia, through the Combined Task Force (CTF) 150, which has established a Maritime Security Patrol Area (MSPA) in the Gulf of Aden. CTF 150 units in this area, including RN vessels, are actively conducting operations to counter destabilising activities primarily aimed at deterring and disrupting acts of piracy;

Standing NATO Maritime Group 2, including attached RN units, will also be deploying to the region with a mandate which allows them to conduct counter-piracy operations from mid-October. NATO is considering the ways in which this mandate can be implemented including the escorting of World Food Programme shipping into port in Mogadishu; and

We have also supported EU planning for a counter-piracy naval operation off the coast of Somalia, and on 14 October the EU Political and Security Committee decided to accept the offer made by the UK to provide the Operation Commander (Rear Admiral Phil Jones) and the Operation HQ (the Multinational Headquarters at Northwood). A formal decision from the EU member states to allow planning for the operation to proceed to the next stage is expected in the coming days. The UK offer is subject to sufficient forces being generated for an operation likely to begin in December.

Territorial Army: Dental Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the adequacy of provision of dental treatment for members of the Territorial Army. (226122)

All members of the Territorial Army make their own personal arrangements for dental treatment when they are not mobilised. They receive dental checks from the Defence Dental Services when they are due to be mobilised for deployment and are advised of any treatment required within the next six months.

While mobilised, members of the Territorial Army receive free dental treatment from the Defence Dental Services.

Trident Missiles

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what recent discussions he has had with his US counterpart on progress towards a successor to the D5 missile; and what role UK personnel have played in that work. (228900)

Neither I nor my predecessor have held any negotiations with our US counterparts on a successor to the D5 missile. As explained in the December 2006 White Paper “The Future of the UK’s Nuclear Deterrent” (Cm 6994), decisions on whether we wish to acquire a successor to the life extended D5 missile, and what form any successor might take, are unlikely to be necessary until the 2020s.

USA: Military Bases

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence at which bases in (a) England, (b) Scotland, (c) Northern Ireland and (d) Wales US visiting forces are based. (228387)

US visiting forces occupy the following bases in England, all designated as RAF bases: Alconbury, Cambridgeshire; Barford St. John, Oxfordshire; Croughton, Northants; Fairford, Gloucestershire; Feltwell, Norfolk; Lakenheath, Suffolk; Menwith Hill, North Yorkshire; Molesworth, Cambridgeshire; Upwood, Cambridgeshire; Welford, Berkshire. In addition, there is a USVF presence at the Joint Maritime Facility at St Mawgan, Cornwall. There are no USVF bases in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland.

Warships

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how many months and what percentage time each Royal Navy attack submarine in service spent (a) on operations and (b) in maintenance in (i) 2007-08 and (ii) 2008-09 to date; (226980)

(2) how many months and what percentage of time each Royal Navy destroyer in service spent (a) on operations and (b) in maintenance in each year since 2006;

(3) how many months and what percentage of time each Royal Navy aircraft carrier in service spent (a) on operations and (b) in maintenance in each year since 1997.

The months and percentage time spent on operations or in maintenance for the periods requested for Royal Navy carriers, destroyers and attack submarines are as follows:

Ark Royal

Months

Percentage

Op time

Main time

Op time

Main time

1997

10

0

0

0

1998

10

0

0

0

1999

0

8

0

63

2000

0

12

0

100

2001

1

7

0

58

2002

4

2

31

21

2003

3

4

38

15

2004

10

2

0

9

2005

10

3

0

27

2006

0

9

0

66

2007

3

1

25

8

2008

4

0

33

0

1 HMS Ark Royal at low readiness.

Illustrious

Months

Percentage

Op time

Main time

Op time

Main time

1997

7

3

62

11

1998

3

7

26

49

1999

4

4

19

23

2000

3

5

40

20

2001

6

4

48

4

2002

3

4

23

27

2003

0

12

0

100

2004

10

9

0

85

2005

4

2

19

15

2006

5

5

37

15

2007

5

3

42

25

2008

5

1

42

8

1 HMS Illustrious conducting post refit trials.

Invincible

Months

Percentage

Op time

Main time

Op time

Main time

1997

5

4

42

33

1998

5

3

42

25

1999

5

6

42

50

2000

6

4

50

33

2001

1

10

8

83

2002

0

12

0

100

2003

4

1

33

8

2004

6

5

50

42

2005

3

4

25

33

2006

10

0

0

0

2007

10

0

0

0

2008

10

0

0

0

1 HMS Invincible at low readiness in Portsmouth.

Destroyers

2007

2008

Months

Percentage

Months

Percentage

Vessel

Op time

Main time

Op time

Main time

Op time

Main time

Op time

Main time

Edinburgh

6

3

50

25

5

2

42

17

Gloucester

1

9

8

75

3

3

25

25

Manchester

7

4

58

33

6

3

58

25

York

4

2

33

17

0

9

0

83

Exeter

4

1

33

8

5

0

42

0

Liverpool

1

7

8

58

8

1

75

8

Nottingham

5

4

42

33

4

0

33

0

Southampton

7

2

58

17

2

5

17

42

Attack submarines

2007

2008

Months

Percentage

Months

Percentage

Vessel

Op time

Main time

Op time

Main time

Op time

Main time

Op time

Main time

Superb

1

8

10

64

2

4

17

46

Sceptre

7

2

55

13

1

6

12

61

Trafalgar

0

10

0

81

4

2

41

19

Turbulent

2

7

20

57

0

9

0

100

Tireless

5

4

41

29

3

5

28

54

Torbay

0

11

0

92

2

4

17

39

Trenchant

5

3

39

26

4

2

39

23

Talent

5

3

39

22

5

2

53

18

Triumph

0

12

0

100

0

9

0

100

The figures given for 2008 in all tables are for 1 January to 30 September 2008.

Time not accounted for under operations and maintenance in the tables includes periods of basic sea safety training, post refit trials, periods of extended leave and other duties (such as conducting synthetic training, ammunitioning, storing) undertaken while in port.

As I stated in my letter to the hon. Member on 5 November 2007, the figures provided are necessarily approximate because records held centrally do not always distinguish precisely between routine maintenance and other time spent alongside, since the two activities are often intermixed.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how many days each Type 42 destroyer in service spent at sea in each year since 2003; (227933)

(2) how many days each attack submarine in service has spent at sea in each year since 2003;

(3) how many days each Type (a) 22 and (b) 23 frigate in service spent at sea in each year since 2003.

The number of days at sea for Royal Navy Destroyers, Frigates and Attack Submarines since 2003 are as follows:

Attack Submarines

Vessel

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Sovereign

108

27

52

141

01

0

Spartan

103

98

181

01

0

0

Splendid

164

01

0

0

0

0

Superb

02

0

0

261

75

71

Sceptre

176

123

149

110

217

44

Trafalgar

0

95

148

128

51

156

Turbulent

143

157

135

141

96

0

Tireless

142

152

0

122

159

95

Torbay

212

23

117

209

0

115

Trenchant

104

115

146

0

185

119

Talent

02

0

0

56

189

140

Triumph

221

6

02

0

0

0

Notes:

1. HMS Sovereign, HMS Spartan And HMS Splendid were decommissioned submarines that were running over the period.

2. The figures for HMS Superb, HMS Talent and HMS Triumph reflect their major refit periods.

Destroyers

Vessel

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Edinburgh

157

149

67

111

121

134

Gloucester

129

131

111

141

37

75

Manchester

143

118

128

47

153

132

York

172

54

177

118

97

0

Exeter

61

163

0

96

71

19

Liverpool

188

110

154

126

63

131

Nottingham

0

85

138

126

109

60

Southampton

35

158

109

142

167

44

Type 22 and 23 Frigates

Vessel

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Argyll

91

138

157

135

143

114

Lancaster

150

42

135

146

142

95

Iron Duke

176

140

97

163

22

139

Monmouth

117

162

114

101

170

44

Montrose

24

122

165

139

152

173

Westminster

70

40

135

148

92

150

St Albans

121

148

98

159

41

35

Northumberland

164

14

66

152

137

90

Richmond

167

157

11

46

206

103

Somerset

103

184

83

23

79

127

Sutherland

164

120

97

141

153

0

Kent

183

104

72

169

98

113

Portland

160

99

125

44

184

57

Cornwall

148

105

34

113

159

100

Cumberland

114

178

143

66

23

78

Campbeltown

128

168

137

63

159

114

Chatham

180

110

128

129

94

163

The figures given for 2008 in all tables are for 1 January to 30 September 2008.

These figures do not include time spent in harbour, alongside training, self maintenance and periods of leave.

Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform

Post Office Network

6. To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what progress has been made on the network change programme for the post office network in Greater Manchester and High Peak. (229221)

Following local consultations, Post Office Ltd announced its decisions on the Greater Manchester and High Peak area plan on 12 August. These confirmed that 316 branches would be retained in the area, and that four closure proposals, including Spotland Road in Rochdale, had been withdrawn. To date, 63 post office closures have been confirmed for Greater Manchester and High Peak with decisions on two other closure proposals still awaited.

7. To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what progress has been made on the post office network change programme. (229222)

Local consultations on all 42 of Post Office Ltd's area plans have closed and decisions have been announced on 41 area plans. To date, 87 closure proposals and five outreach proposals had been withdrawn in the light of responses to local consultations. Following the network change programme, on average, over 90 per cent. of customers nationally will see no change to their local post office.

8. To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what guidance his Department gave to community groups on participating in the Post Office consultation on network change; and if he will make a statement. (229223)

The arrangements for local consultation on Post Office Ltd's Network Change Programme area plans were the responsibility of the company, operating within the framework of a Memorandum of Understanding agreed with Postwatch, and monitored closely by the consumer body. I understand that there was extensive participation and levels of response to the network change proposals put forward to local consultation from local authorities and other community and representative groups.

Construction Industry

9. To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what recent assessment he has made of the level of activity in the construction industry. (229226)

I refer the right hon. Member to the reply I gave to the hon. Member for Scarborough and Whitby some moments ago.

Glass Industry

10. To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what recent assessment he has made of the competitiveness of the British glass industry; and if he will make a statement. (229228)

No such assessment has been made recently, however the most recent figures show that the glass industry contributes £1.2 billion to the UK economy, and employs around 28,000 people directly.

Business Environment: Essex

11. To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many meetings Ministers in his Department have had with the Minister for the East of England to discuss the business environment in Essex since 1 July 2007. (229229)

Ministers from the Department regularly meet with my hon. Friend the Minister for the East of England to discuss a range of issues.

Small Businesses

12. To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what steps he is taking to promote and protect growth in small businesses. (229230)

The Government are committed to promoting enterprise. Our policies have ensured that internationally the UK is now recognised as among the best in the world to start and grow a business. The Government are determined to build on that success. That is why we published a renewed Enterprise Strategy in March that sets out a framework of five drivers to inform and structure the Government’s enterprise policy: Culture, Knowledge and Skills, Finance, Innovation and Regulation. My hon. Friend will also be aware of the package of measures to support small businesses that were announced this week.

Internet Governance Forum

13. To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what steps he is taking to support the work of the Internet Governance Forum. (229231)

The Government are committed to ensuring the success of the multi-stakeholder Internet Governance Forum (IGF) process. We are a leading donor, with £50,000 committed to supporting the IGF Secretariat this year. The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) works in partnership with Nominet in the UK IGF, which is identifying key messages for the third IGF in Hyderabad in December. In addition to promoting the contributions of UK parliamentarians, Nominet and other UK stakeholders in Hyderabad, BERR will hold a workshop on virtual worlds for delivering public service and innovation.

Alcoholic Drinks: Prices

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (1) what assessment he has made of the relationship between the price of alcohol and drinking behaviour; and if he will make a statement; (227293)

(2) what plans he has to regulate the sale of low-cost alcohol as a loss leader in supermarkets; and if he will make a statement.

I have been asked to reply.

The Department commissioned the School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), at the university of Sheffield to produce an independent review on the effects of alcohol price, promotion, consumption and harm. The review has two phases:

Phase 1 systematically identified, appraised and synthesised international evidence on the relationship between alcohol price, promotion, consumption and harm. Summary of the first phase, published on 22 July, found significant links between price and youth and heavy drinkers but it has less of an impact on moderate and occasional drinkers; and

Phase 2 explored the potential impact of potential policy changes in this area, especially the population-based impact on health, crime, and wider economy for the population as a whole and also with a focus on: young people under 18 who drink alcohol; 18 to 24-year-old hazardous drinkers; and, harmful drinkers whose patterns of drinking damage their physical/mental health or causes substantial harm to others.

Findings from the review are expected to be published this year and are intended to inform understanding of retail practices, whether they are linked to excessive drinking, and whether Government intervention is likely to be proportionate and have a significant beneficial impact.

Energy: Business

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what assistance his Department makes available to help rural businesses meet energy bills. (227739)

I have been asked to reply.

We have a range of support to assist rural SMEs as part of the Government’s support to the SME sector as a whole. We have developed information for our Businesslink.gov portal to consolidate and provide one-stop shop advice to SMEs on energy efficiency. We intend to have measures in place by the end of this year to enable SMEs to access energy efficiency advice and support though information and services provided by all energy suppliers. The Carbon Trust offers a range of interest-free energy efficiency loans and advice.

Retail Trade

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what recent assessment he has made of the future competitiveness of the retail sector. (229224)

Assessments of the competitiveness of different parts of the retail sector are undertaken from time to time including in the recent Competition Commission investigation into the grocery sector.

It is clear that the grocery sector is still a strong, competitive market. Other parts of the retail sector are facing tougher times.

We are continuing to work through what farther action, Government can take to help all businesses through the current economic downturn.

Small Businesses: Economic Situation

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what steps his Department is taking to protect small businesses in the current economic climate; and if he will make a statement. (229214)

Small businesses are central to the UK economy and the Government are fully committed to supporting business at this critical time.

We have committed to pay firms within 10 days, and to ensure banks make funds available to small businesses.

We also announced this week:

An enhanced training offer through Train to Gain;

Free “Health Checks” through Business Link; and

New finance guides with the Institute of Credit Management.

Communities and Local Government

Community Relations: Islam

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer of 13 October 2008, Official Report, column 989W, on terrorism, what progress has been made on point 11 of the 12-point plan of 5 August 2005 in respect of consulting Muslim leaders with regard to those clerics who are not British citizens to draw up a list of those not suitable to preach who will be excluded from the UK. (227938)

[holding answer 17 October 2008]: On progress against the 12-point plan, I refer the hon. Member again to the update provided by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department on 1 September 2008, Official Report, column 1594W. This sets out that all counter-terrorism work has now been subsumed into the United Kingdom’s long-term strategy for countering terrorism (the CONTEST strategy).

On point 11 in the 12-point plan, I refer the hon. Member again to the statement made by the then Secretary of State for the Home Department, my right hon. Friend the Member for Norwich, South (Mr. Clarke) on 15 December 2005, Official Report, columns 167-71WS. No further action was taken in respect of drawing up a list of ‘clerics’ to be excluded from the UK.

Since August 2005, 79 individuals have been excluded from the UK on the basis that they have engaged in unacceptable behaviours. The statistics are not broken down according to the professional background of the individuals concerned. I also refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my hon. Friend the Member for Oldham, East and Saddleworth (Mr. Woolas) on 20 October 2008, Official Report, column 14W.

Council Housing: South West

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many local authority-owned, non-decent dwellings there were in (a) the South West and (b) Stroud district in the last 12 months for which figures are available. (229735)

The Department collects figures on local authority non-decent homes through the published annual Business Plan Statistical Appendix. According to the latest returns available, the number of non-decent local authority homes as at 1 April 2007 in South West England as a whole was 27,128 (22 per cent. of stock). The figure for Stroud was 510 (10 per cent. of stock). The regional figure includes non-decent homes in local authorities which had established an arm’s length management organisation to manage their homes.

Council Tax

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much council tax liability was written off by local authorities in each year since 1985; and what proportion of council tax liability this represented in each such year. (229416)

Details of the amount of council tax expected to be collected within the year by local authorities in England since 2002-03 (in £ millions), the amount of council tax written off each year, and the proportion of the amount to be collected this represents are shown in the following table. The data are reported annually by all billing authorities and were first collected in 2002-03.

Amount of council tax to be collected (£ million)

Amount written off (£ million)

Proportion of council tax to be collected written off (percentage)

2002-03

14,624

109

0.75

2003-04

16,574

133

0.80

2004-05

17,730

137

0.77

2005-06

18,576

130

0.70

2006-07

19,554

134

0.69

2007-08

20,609

159

0.73

The amounts written off relate to council tax payable for both the current year and for previous years.

Some authorities net off against write-offs moneys collected that had previously been written off. This can result in a negative total figure for amounts written off in a particular year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what percentage of council tax liability was not collected by local authorities in England in each year since 1985. (229417)

Details of the percentage of council tax liability collected in year by local authorities in England, since the introduction of council tax in 1993-94 and 2006-07, are available in table 2.2m of “Local Government Financial Statistics No 18 2008” which is available on the Communities and Local Government website at:

http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/stats/lgfs/2008/lgfs18/

Data for 2007-08 were published in a Statistical Release on 18 June 2008 and are available at:

http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/ctax/cp078.htm.

Collection of council taxes continues once the financial year to which they relate has ended. This means that the percentage collected will eventually be higher than the figure shown.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the average Band D council tax increase was in England in each year since 1985. (229418)

Details of the average Band D council tax increase in England since the introduction of council tax in 1993-94, are available on the Communities and Local Government website at:

http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/ctax/data/ctaxtimes.xls

Departmental Official Visits

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much was spent on overnight accommodation by her Department's civil servants in the last 12 months. (228765)

For the 12-month period from October 2007 to September 2008 the amount spent on overnight accommodation by civil servants in the Department for Communities and Local Government, excluding Government offices, departmental agencies and NDPBs, was £482,887.

Departmental Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many civil servants working in her Department and its agencies have pensions with a cash equivalent transfer value of over £1 million. (229557)

It is not appropriate to disclose pension information for civil servants other than board members whose details are shown in the remuneration report in annual resource accounts. A copy of Communities and Local Government’s resource accounts for financial year 2007-8 can be found in the Library or accessed electronically using the following link

http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/hc0708/hc07/0791/0791.pdf

Deprivation Indicators

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer of 29 April 2008, Official Report, column 313W, on the index of deprivation, whether distance calculations were (a) made by the Oxford University researchers producing the report and (b) contained within the primary source data. (229651)

The distance calculations were made by the University of Oxford using point data from the primary data source and population weighted centroid data from the Office for National Statistics.

Government Offices for the Regions

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the cost to the public purse of the Government Offices for the Regions was in (a) 2006-07 and (b) 2007-08. (228623)

The administrative cost to the public purse of the Government offices for the regions was £137,803,159 in 2006-07 and £122,293,471 in 2007-08.

Government Offices for the Regions: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the total programme budget managed or influenced by Government Offices for the Regions (a) was in 2007-08 and (b) is in 2008-09 according to the Network Corporate Plan. (229680)

Programme expenditure is the responsibility of each of the sponsor Departments and the GO Network no longer retains annual records of this. I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to the hon. Member for Falmouth and Camborne (Julia Goldsworthy) on 6 March 2008, Official Report, column 2782W, which provided the programme spend breakdown for 2006-07.

Green belt

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer of 12 May 2008, Official Report, column 1393W, on the green belt, what her reasons were for approving the Regional Spatial Strategy's proposals to review and develop on the green belt. (229624)

Once the general extent of a green belt has been approved, it should be altered only in exceptional circumstances. However, it is good practice to check, from time to time, that the extent of a particular green belt is still appropriate and justified. The Regional Spatial Strategy is the appropriate vehicle for this.

In general terms, if any alteration is proposed, the Secretary of State will wish to be satisfied that the relevant local planning authority has considered opportunities for development in the urban areas contained by, and beyond, the green belt. National planning policy is a consideration throughout the process, including, especially, Planning Policy Guidance Note 2: “Green Belts”.

Detailed changes to a green belt boundary would be a matter for the local planning authority through the development plan process. The guidance states that boundaries should not be changed unless alterations to the Regional Spatial Strategy have been approved, or other exceptional circumstances make revision necessary.

Home Information Packs

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the written ministerial statement of 8 May 2008, Official Report, columns 37-39WS, on home information packs, in what ways her Department will seek to enhance the current product and quality of the pack. (229650)

The consultation published on 22 July set out our proposals to improve the information provided to consumers as part of the home information pack. A copy of the consultation was placed in the Library of the House.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer of 6 October 2008, Official Report, column 322W, on home information packs, how many penalty charge notices have been issued to the responsible person for breaches of home information pack duties to date. (230077)

Homelessness

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many householders have presented themselves to a local authority as homeless in England in each year since 1985; and how many of those presented following (a) mortgage repayment difficulties and (b) rental arrears in each such year. (229415)

Information about English local housing authorities’ actions under the homelessness legislation (Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996) is collected quarterly at local authority level. Data collected includes all decisions made on applications by eligible applicants, and the number of applicants accepted by local housing authorities as eligible for assistance, unintentionally homeless and in priority need, and therefore owed a main homelessness duty (to secure that suitable accommodation is available). These households are known as ‘accepted’ households.

The following table shows the total number of decisions from 1991 to 2007, on applications from households eligible for assistance under the homelessness provisions of the 1985 and 1996 Housing Acts.

Total number of decisions made by English local housing authorities under the 1985 and 1996 Housing Act on applications from eligible households1, 1991 to 2007

Total decisions

1991

301,620

1992

305,640

1993

288,250

1994

269,630

1995

271,500

1996

263,900

1997

242,340

1998

245,350

1999

243,290

2000

247,190

2001

255,080

2002

269,330

2003

296,970

2004

281,460

2005

227,260

2006

168,530

2007

137,690

1 Decisions on applications from households eligible for assistance under the homelessness provisions of the 1985 and 1996 Housing Act.

Information on decisions by reason for loss of last settled home (which includes mortgage arrears and rent arrears) is not held centrally. However this information is held for accepted households and this is provided back to 1997 in our quarterly Statistical Release on Statutory Homelessness (table 5), which is published on our website and placed in the Library each quarter.

http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/corporate/xls/963636.xls

Housing Companies: Reorganisation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether directors of the Homes and Communities Agency who are also employed by (a) the Housing Corporation and (b) English Partnership will receive remuneration for both roles until the formal amalgamation of the organisations has been completed. (228507)

Directors of the Homes and Communities Agency who are currently employed by either the Housing Corporation or English Partnership will only receive remuneration for their substantive position. When they take up their posting in the HCA, once vesting has occurred, they will be remunerated by that organisation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many staff are employed by (a) the Housing Corporation and (b) English Partnerships; and how many of these staff she expects to be retained by the Homes and Communities Agency. (228517)

At 1 October, English Partnerships had an establishment of 610 full-time equivalents (FTEs), with 501 staff in post (FTEs). At 1 October, Housing Corporation had an establishment of 556.6 FTEs, with 497 staff in post (FTEs). At Vesting day, the Homes and Communities Agency will inherit 276 staff from the Housing Corporation and the Tenant Services Authority will inherit 250 staff.

In addition to the aforementioned numbers, the Homes and Communities Agency will have 58 posts from CLG and 30 posts from the Academy of Sustainable Communities.

A very small number of staff have decided not to transfer to either the HCA or TSA, and will therefore leave either English Partnerships or the Housing Corporation before the new agencies are created.

Housing: Low Incomes

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much of the public funding available for the provision of affordable housing in the next three years is ring-fenced for such provision in rural areas in (a) Stafford constituency, (b) the West Midlands region and (c) England. (225308)

The Housing Corporation has been set a national target to provide 10,300 affordable homes in smaller rural communities. The Housing Corporation's investment partners can bid for grant funding from the National Affordable Housing Programme. Grant will be allocated to those schemes which meet the needs of local people, the regional strategy and demonstrate strong value for money.

The allocations made to date for units to be completed during 2008-11 for settlements below 3,000 is in (a) Staffordshire (Newcastle-under-Lyme, South Staffordshire and Stafford local authorities): £1.6 million for 27 social rent units and 26 LCHO units, (b) the West Midlands region is £10 million for 208 social rent units and 137 LCHO units and (c) England is £153 million for 3,520 social rent units and 1,572 LCHO units.

Housing: Overcrowding

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer of 14 October 2008, Official Report, columns 1098-1100W, on housing: overcrowding, what estimate she has made of the number of households living in overcrowded conditions in each local authority area. (228355)

Estimates of overcrowding for individual local authorities are not routinely available because sample sizes at local authority level are too small. However, the results of a one-off model are available based on a combination of three years’ data from both the Survey of English Housing and DWP’s Family Resources Survey for 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03. Based on this model, estimates of the percentages of households in various local authorities that were overcrowded during the three-year period 2000-01 to 2002-03 are set out in table 1 of the publication at the following link:

http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/housing/overcrowding

Housing: Private Finance Initiative

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what recent assessment she has made of the effect of current economic conditions on the financial position of private finance initiative housing schemes. (227889)

My Department is monitoring the situation and working closely with all PFI schemes to help support them in finding solutions where difficulties arise. If a local authority were to approach this Department with concerns about a scheme, we would provide advice and support as appropriate.

Housing: Valuation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate she has made of the capital value of (a) housing association and (b) council housing stock in each year since 1997. (229406)

Local Government Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much public funding was provided to (a) Stroud District Council and (b) Gloucestershire County Council in (i) non-formula funding and (ii) formula grant in each of the last four financial years. (228870)

The amount of non-formula funding and formula grant provided to Stroud district council and Gloucestershire county council in each of the last four financial years is shown in the following table.

£000

(a) Stroud district council

(b) Gloucestershire county council

(i) Non-formula funding

(ii) Formula grant

(i) Non-formula funding

(ii) Formula grant

2004-05

875

5,420

115,483

329,643

2005-06

1,415

5,600

112,194

352,373

2006-07

2,130

6,459

377,490

92,747

2007-081

1,885

6,792

430,799

95,155

1 Provisional

Source:

Communities and Local Government Revenue Outturn (RO) returns

Figures are as supplied by the local authority to Communities and Local Government.

The estimates for 2007-08 are based on provisional revenue outturn data. The final 2007-08 outturn figures will be available later this year.

Non-formula funding is defined here as specific grants inside aggregate external finance (AEF), i.e. revenue grants paid for a council's core services (e.g. Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG)).

Formula grant is defined here as the sum of revenue support grant and redistributed non-domestic rates.

Figures exclude grants outside AEF (i.e. where funding is for an authority's core services, but is passed to a third party, for example, rent allowances and rebates), capital grants, funding for the local authority's housing management responsibilities and those grant programmes (such as European funding) where an authority is simply one of the recipients of funding paid towards an area.

The large change in non-formula funding and formula grant from 2005-06 to 2006-07 is because local authorities now receive funding for schools through DSG rather than as part of formula grant.

Comparisons across years may not be valid owing to changing local authority responsibilities.

Local Government: Bank Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government which local authorities and other public institutions for which she has responsibility hold accounts in Icelandic banks; and how much is held by each institution in such banks. (227303)

In relation to local authorities, I refer the hon. Member to my answer of 17 October 2008, Official Report, column 1577W, to the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles)

The Audit Commission issued a statement on 16 October on its deposits in Icelandic banks, which is on its website at:

www.audit-commission.gov.uk

Officials have contacted agencies, public corporations and non-departmental public bodies for which Communities and Local Government has responsibility and, excepting the Audit Commission, we are not aware of any that have investments in Icelandic banks.

Local Government: By-elections

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether she plans to make an order moving the date of the local elections in 2009; and if she will make a statement. (229311)

I refer the hon. Member to the written statement I made to the House on 7 October 2009, Official Report, column 8WS.

Local Government: Elections

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether there are restrictions on local authorities using their powers as laid under Part 2 of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 to change the timing of their elections, other than the provisions laid out in the primary legislation. (229674)

There are no restrictions on local authorities using their powers under part 2 of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 to change their scheme of elections, other than those laid out in primary legislation by Parliament.

New Milton Sand and Ballast

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will extend the deadline for responses to her Department in respect of the appeal by New Milton Sand and Ballast to the High Court under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (reference: 82483). (229474)

The deadline has been extended to 7 November, in response to a request from local campaign groups who sought more time to formulate their response.

Ordnance Survey: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many staff were employed by Ordnance Survey in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available. (228402)

The number of permanent staff employed at Ordnance Survey in either a full or part-time capacity on 31 March in each of the 10 years to 2008 was as follows:

Staff

1999

1,864

2000

1,852

2001

1,848

2002

1,790

2003

1,467

2004

1,485

2005

1,433

2006

1,397

2007

1,362

2008

1,357

Planning Permission

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what guidance she has provided to local authorities on the time it should take to (a) investigate planning transgressions and (b) implement planning enforcement where necessary. (227932)

Guidance on the timing of investigations into allegations of unauthorised development and on the timing of enforcement procedures is given in the Department's publication “Enforcing Planning Control: Good Practice for Local Planning Authorities”.

Paragraph 2.3 of this document recommends that in investigating complaints concerning unauthorised development, a local planning authority should respond to a complaint within 15 working days, explaining what action the authority proposes to take and tell the complainant about the local planning authority's decision to make formal enforcement action within 10 working days of the authority's making that decision.

Paragraphs 5.19-5.25 deal with sections 173-174 of the Town and Country Planning Act (TCPA) 1990 concerning the date on which a planning enforcement notice takes effect and the compliance period for the taking of any remedial action required by the enforcement notice. The provisions of the TCPA 1990 require that the service of an enforcement notice shall not take place less than 28 days before the date on which it is to take effect. But the guidance indicates that it may be prudent to allow a margin of several days above this minimum period so as to ensure that all interested parties receive the notice not less than 28 days before the effective date. The compliance period should be as short as can reasonably be allowed and it should not normally exceed one year. But it will be for the LPA to decide on how long it should be depending on the complexity of the case.

Planning Permission: Castle Point

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what representations she has received on the number of planning enforcement files open and awaiting action by Castle Point borough council; and if she will make a statement. (229315)

The Secretary of State has received no representations concerning planning enforcement cases being dealt with by Castle Point borough council. It is for the local planning authority to decide in each case which is the most appropriate course of action, taking account of local circumstances. PPG 18, Enforcing Planning Control offers guidance to local planning authorities on enforcement issues and gives them a wide range of discretion. Paragraph 5(1) states

“Parliament has given local planning authorities the primary responsibility for taking whatever enforcement action may be necessary, in the public interest, in their administrative area”.

The 2006 planning enforcement review confirmed that local planning authorities had sufficient enforcement powers to deal with breaches of planning control.

Planning: Enforcement

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what representations she has received from local authorities on the likely effect of the provisions of Clause 151 of the Planning Bill, if enacted, on their ability to take enforcement action following complaints regarding alleged statutory nuisance by major infrastructure project developers. (229473)

We have received representations from LACORS (local authority co-ordinators of regulatory services), among other stakeholders, on the likely effect of the provisions of what was Clause 151 of the Planning Bill.

The Government tabled amendments to remove Clause 151 from the Planning Bill, and insert provisions in its place that maintain the current balanced settlement. They allow development of nationally significant infrastructure to go forward while nevertheless ensuring that individuals are able to receive compensation for the effect on their land. These amendments were accepted during House of Lords Committee stage.

Regional Ministers

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the estimated cost to the public purse is of the work of regional ministers annually; and if she will make a statement. (229053)

The estimated cost of the work of the regional Ministers over the last year is £1.173 million. This figure includes Government office and departmental staff supporting these Ministers in their regional role. It does not cover any further costs incurred by the Ministers’ home Departments as the information is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Rented Housing: Carbon Monoxide

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) what estimate her Department has made of the number of (a) privately rented student accommodation or houses, (b) student halls of residence and (c) residential care homes which are not fitted with carbon monoxide alarms; (229324)

(2) what representations her Department has received on introducing a mandatory requirement for carbon monoxide alarms to be fitted in all forms of rented accommodation.

The Department does not hold information in relation to the number of homes that are not fitted with carbon monoxide alarms.

The Department receives a large number of representations in relation to housing and health some of which relate to carbon monoxide alarms.

There are no current requirements to install carbon monoxide monitors in privately rented properties. However, we are keen to promote good practice and landlords’ organisations are already engaged on safety issues and are involved in the promotion of good practice to their members.

Landlords are responsible for maintaining their properties, including the safety of gas and electrical appliances and the fire safety of furniture and furnishings provided under the tenancy. All private landlords are required by the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1998 to ensure that all gas appliances are maintained in good order and that an annual gas safety check is carried out by a CORGI-registered tradesman.

Taxis: Licensing

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what (a) time period and (b) jurisdictions are covered by Criminal Records Bureau checks on (i) British and (ii) foreign national applicants for taxi licences. (229312)

Communities and Local Government has no responsibility for these matters. The licensing of taxis is the responsibility of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Transport. The Criminal Records Bureau is an Executive agency of the Home Office.

Travelling People: Regional Planning and Development

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what powers the regional development agencies will have in respect of regional planning for Traveller camps from 2010. (229621)

We have yet to issue our response to the consultation on the Review of Sub National Economic Development and Regeneration which included proposals to streamline arrangements at regional level. We do not intend to pre-empt our response by making statements about specific aspects of regional strategy or governance arrangements.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Carbon Emissions: Allotments

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the relationship between the use of allotments and reduction of carbon dioxide emissions. (224944)

I have been asked to reply.

No assessment has been made of the relationship between carbon dioxide emissions and allotments.

Carbon Emissions: Public Bodies

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent estimate he has made of annual carbon dioxide emissions arising from bodies recognised as public corporations by the Office for National Statistics; and if he will make a statement. (225005)

I have been asked to reply.

DECC does not hold disaggregated data on CO2 emissions from public corporations.

Greenhouse gas emissions for all sectors of the economy can be found in the Environmental Accounts section of the Office for National Statistics website at:

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk =5695&More=Y

Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer of 6 March 2008, Official Report, column 2715W, on the Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture (CEFAS): finance, how much he intends to allocate to CEFAS in (a) 2008-09 and (b) each of the next five years; and if he will make a statement. (228070)

There have been no formal changes to the response provided on 6 March 2008, Official Report, column 2715W.

Climate Change

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether his Department has re-assessed any of its UK flood mapping timelines in view of the accelerated rate of Arctic summer ice melt of 2007-08 and its significance for the melting of the Greenland ice cap. (225101)

I have been asked to reply.

Recent research findings from the Met Office and the Environment Agency for the Thames Estuary 2100 project indicate that higher ranges for sea level rise are broadly in line with DEFRA's October 2006 published guidance to operating authorities.

DECC is expecting a new set of climate change scenarios from the UK Climate Impacts Partnership (UKCIP) in spring 2009, which will give a better understanding of the uncertainties associated with future sea level rise. DECC will be working closely with UKCIP and other delivery bodies to understand the risks and review policy guidance.

UK research is aimed at improving the representations of ice sheets in climate models and understanding future changes in ice sheet volume and sea level. Early indications suggest that changes in ice sheet volumes could bring a significant contribution to sea level rise. However, further research is needed to shed more light on the risks. DEFRA and DECC will continue to work closely with our science networks to better understand these risks.

Departmental Public Participation

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what (a) listening exercises and (b) public forums his Department has held in each of the last two years; and what the (i) purpose and (ii) cost was in each case; and who the private contractor was and how much it was paid in each case. (221350)

DEFRA has held one major listening exercise in the last two years. The Citizen's Summit on Climate Change in May 2007 was managed entirely through the Central Office of Information at a total cost of £440,791. These costs were in line with exercises of a similar scale and scope.

The principal objectives and benefits included:

Informing public consultation for the Climate Change Bill;

Talking about the early stages of the Act on C02 campaign to raise public awareness and help citizens to engage with climate change;

Allowing Government, industry and the public to engage in informed dialogue on climate change;

Informing the development of a broader, longer term marketing campaign.

The summit itself was the culmination of a longer term deliberative research process with a representative sample of the population. Members of the public were recruited from across the country, exposed to all sides of the debate and asked about their attitudes and behaviour on climate change.

The final event was a major participative exercise involving the then Secretary of State, the heads of the CBI, TUC and the NCC, policy officials and around 160 members of the public. The event was covered by the media and broadcast over the internet. A full research report was produced and published to capture the key learning from the exercise. This was fed into the formal consultation process of the Climate Change Bill.

The survey of those who participated indicated:

Very high satisfaction with the process;

89 per cent. said that the process had been “very important”;

Levels of feeling better informed about climate change doubled during the process, as did levels of personal engagement with the issue (“I am personally making a lot of effort” from 31 per cent. to 62 per cent.);

The process informed the development of the ‘Footprint’ creative device for the Act on C02 advertising campaign. More than 50 per cent. of those who saw the first phase of this activity said that they had or planned to take action as a result of the campaign.

Insulation: Housing

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will place in the Library the details of the assumptions behind his policy on encouraging savings in household bills from home insulation. (224512)

I have been asked to reply.

The assumptions behind Government policy are based on the findings of the two following reports, both of which are available on the website of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

“Measurement of energy savings and comfort levels in houses receiving insulation upgrades”, Martin and Watson, Energy Monitoring Company, June 2006.

“Review of Differences between Measured and Theoretical Energy Savings for Insulation Measures”, Sanders and Phillipson, Centre for Research on Indoor Climate and Health, December 2006.

Assumptions from these reports have been used to update the Building Research Establishment's BREDEM model for domestic energy usage and to calculate energy savings for the following measures.

The energy savings were converted into cost savings for a standard three-bedroom semi-detached house with gas-dominated heating on a standard heating pattern and energy pricing assumed a price of 3.8p per kWh of energy saved for gas and 13p per kWh for electricity, based on consumer tariffs available in September 2008.

Illustrative value of core measures and annual energy bill savings

£

Cavity wall insulation

Loft insulation (from empty)

Loft insulation (top-up)

Estimated installation costs1

500

500

500

Annual fuel bill savings per household

150

100

30

1 Estimated average overall installation costs to consumer and energy supplier under Carbon Emissions Reduction Target scheme, as published by the Energy Saving Trust.

Ivory

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent discussions he has had with the government of China on that country’s involvement in the ivory trade; and if he will make a statement. (225984)

A number of discussions took place between officials about China’s involvement in the ivory trade in the lead up to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) Standing Committee meeting, held during July 2008 in Geneva.

Seas and Oceans: Nature Conservation

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what discussions he has had with the EU Directorate General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries on whether the UK is empowered to curtail fishing effort in marine conservation zones in UK waters. (221638)

A range of formal and informal discussions take place with the Commissioner on a regular basis covering a wide range of issues. Through these means the Commissioner is kept abreast of developments taking place in the United Kingdom.

Taxis

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much was claimed in expenses for taxi travel by officials from (a) his Department and (b) its executive agencies in (i) 2006-07, (ii) 2005-06, (iii) 2004-05, (iv) 2003-04 and (v) 2002-03; and if he will make a statement. (227055)

From information held centrally by the core-Department’s financial system the VAT inclusive expenditure on taxis for the financial years 2006-07 and 2007-08 is as follows:

£

2006-07

268,103.95

2007-08

346,457.63

DEFRA’s total departmental spending in 2007-08 was some £3.7 billion. Information for financial years prior to 2006-07 could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

The Department requires any use of taxis to be appropriate to business needs, represent value for money and follow civil service rules for the use of money.

Written Questions: Government Responses

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many and what proportion of written questions for answer on a named day his Department has answered on the due date in the current Session of Parliament to date. (226898)

As at 9 October 2008, we had received a total of 841 named day questions, and we answered 333 on the due date. This equates to approximately 40 per cent.

Energy and Climate Change

Carbon Emissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what steps will need to be taken for the EU to achieve a 30 per cent. reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by the year 2020 from a 1990 baseline. (227838)

It will be for EU member states to decide how they best meet their EU commitments in the event of a 30 per cent. greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target. However, this will require a reduction in the EU-wide cap in the EU Emissions Trading System. In addition, the Government already have a wide range of policies in place, including those in the 2006 Climate Change Programme and 2007 Energy White Paper. The framework of binding carbon budgets that the Climate Change Bill establishes will ensure we continue to keep under review the policies and measures needed to meet both our domestic obligations under the Bill and our share of a 30 per cent. European target.

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what his policy is on the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions reductions which should be delivered through the Clean Development Mechanism or Joint Implementation under EU climate change measures. (227863)

The UK Government would like to see project credit access in both the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and greenhouse gas (GHG) effort-share limited to 50 per cent. of absolute effort (in the context of the overarching principle that 50 per cent. of absolute emissions reductions from 2005 must take place within the EU). This, we consider, maintains the correct balance between domestic (EU) abatement, EU leadership on climate change and the cost-effectiveness of the EU’s climate change package.

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change whether he plans to publish a revised impact assessment relating to the Climate Change Bill to take account of the amended target to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 80 per cent. (229323)

An updated Impact Assessment for the Climate Change Bill will be published following Royal Assent, and will reflect the final content of the Bill.

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change whether emissions from (a) aircraft, (b) shipping and (c) cement manufacture are included in (a) the targets to be set in the Climate Change Bill for reductions by (i) 2020 and (ii) 2050 and (b) in the target to reduce emissions by 20 per cent. below the 1990 level by 2010. (229698)

Emissions from domestic aviation and shipping, and from cement manufacture in the UK, will be included in the Climate Change Bill’s 2050 and 2020 targets. They are also included for the purposes of assessing progress towards the Government’s goal to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 20 per cent. against a 1990 baseline by 2010. Emissions from international aviation and shipping are not included in either the Bill’s targets, or the 2010 goal.

Climate Change: Research

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (1) how much the Government have spent on research into climate change since 1997; (227851)

(2) how much the Government have provided by way of grants or subsidies to organisations, companies and people involved in climate change research in each financial year since 1998.

The UK’s leading role in delivering climate change policy has been built on its world-leading research and the Government are committed to continuing support in this area. The Government support research into a wide range of climate change issues, including climate change science and innovations for mitigation and adaptation, but no centrally-collated figures are available for total expenditure.

The majority of Government expenditure in climate change research is provided through the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). NERC receives funding from the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS). NERC’s funding of climate change research in 2007-08 was about 28 per cent. of its net spend of £389 million, approximately £109 million. In addition, universities also invest funding received from the Higher Education Funding Councils, some of which is invested in this area.

DEFRA’s total expenditure on climate change research (including projects of a cross-cutting nature which are of relevance to climate change) over the last six years was £132.8 million (£13.7 million in 2002-03, £17.7 million in 2003-04, £22.0 million in 2004-05, £23.7 million in 2005-06, £24.7 million in 2006-07, and £31.0 million in 2007-08). Figures for earlier years are not readily available.

Energy Savings Trust

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change how many of the directors of the Energy Savings Trust are from energy producing organisations. (225995)

[holding answer 13 October 2008]: The Energy Saving Trust currently has four non-executive directors who are from energy producing organisations.

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what system is in place for ensuring that the Code for Sustainable Homes and the Code of Practice operated by the Energy Savings Trust give appropriate weight to innovative gas saving products. (225998)

[holding answer 13 October 2008]: The Energy Saving Trust does not operate the Code for Sustainable Homes, it is the responsibility of Communities and Local Government.

The Energy Saving Trust operates the “Domestic Energy Efficiency Advice Code of Practice”. This does not specify the absolute weight to be given to advice on any particular class of product or service; rather it emphasises that advice must be based upon, and relevant to, the requirements and circumstances of the recipient.

Fuels: Trade Competitiveness

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what steps he is taking to ensure a competitive market for petrol and diesel. (229213)

The Government are committed to the operation of competitive markets, as the most efficient way of ensuring supply. The supply of transport fuels is a commercial matter, which is subject to UK competition law under the Competition Act 1998. The regulation of supply of transport fuels to consumers is therefore the responsibility of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), who continue to monitor the UK petrol market to ensure that these markets remain competitive.

Industrial Diseases

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what assessment he has made of the reliability of the medical assessment procedure in assessing claims under the coal miners' compensation scheme. (229218)

Respiratory specialists and experienced medical practitioners undertake medical assessments in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and vibration white finger respectively. It is important to take steps to ensure consistency of diagnosis and this is done by providing training specific to each condition and also by auditing the Medical Assessment Process assessments. Specialists are trained to understand each assessment form and its objectives to establish the level of disability caused by chronic pulmonary disease or vibration white finger, assess the impact of any other condition and calculate how much of the disability is due to working in coal mines. Required qualifications for the specialist are set out in each claims handling agreement.

Processes are in place, agreed between both the claimants’ solicitors and the Department, to facilitate the independent auditing of the medical assessment process. The audits are carried out firstly by the lead doctor (who delivers the training) and then by the Medical Reference Panel. The audits are done on a monthly basis and look at a sample of six reports from each respiratory specialist or experienced medical practitioner.

A quality review is undertaken by an independent organisation for medical assessments conducted under the Coal Health Compensation schemes. The Medical Review Panel is also available if any solicitor wish to dispute the medical findings in particular claims.

University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change how much the Government have provided by way of grants or subsidies to the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit in each financial year since 1998. (227854)

The Natural Environment Research Council, which receives funding from the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS), has made grants and awards to the University of East Anglia, but figures specifically for the Climatic Research Unit are not available.

Home Department

Airports: Biometrics

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what her policy is on the compulsory (a) fingerprinting, (b) iris scanning and (c) photographing of (i) UK and (ii) other passengers at UK airports. (226479)

Taking biometrics allows UKBA to fix and verify a person’s identity, allowing a more informed decision about a person’s eligibility and entitlement to enter the UK.

Under current policy, an authorised person has powers to require any arriving passenger, regardless of claimed nationality, to provide biometrics in the form of fingerprints and a photograph of their face at all ports of entry, including airports, for the purpose of ascertaining whether a passport or other document is genuine and relates to the person being examined. This may sometimes require both UK and other nationals to provide fingerprints and photographs to enable the UKBA to verify their identity and nationality.

The UK Border Agency will not store the biometric features of British citizens and EEA nationals.

Compulsory fingerprints and facial photographs are required from all visa applicants before arrival in the UK, and we are committed to extending this requirement, so that all foreign nationals from outside the European economic area register their fingerprints and facial photograph before crossing the border.

Antisocial Behaviour

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much funding has been allocated to tackling antisocial behaviour in (a) Jarrow constituency, (b) South Tyneside, (c) the North East and (d) England and Wales in each year since the inception of such programmes. (228719)

The Home Office has not allocated any direct funding to tackle antisocial behaviour in Jarrow which falls within South Tyneside local authority. Home Office funding allocated to the North East including South Tyneside can be found in the following table.

Between 2003-04 and 2007-08, the Home Office made £34.4 million available in each year specifically and solely to tackle antisocial behaviour. This includes funding for the TOGETHER, then Respect Programmes respectively and a grant for antisocial behaviour co-ordinators.

The antisocial behaviour co-ordinator funding has been renewed for the period 2008-11, and the Home Office contribution to ABG in England amounts to some £61 million, with £3 million available for Wales in each year (the same in cash terms as in 2007-08).

The antisocial behaviour co-ordinator funding forms part of the unringfenced Area Based Grant (ABG) in England. The position in Wales is slightly different, whereby the funding for Community Safety Partnerships has been consolidated into the Crime Reduction and Anti-Social Behaviour National Resource Grant. In both England and Wales, it is for local partnerships to agree how the grants received should be allocated against locally determined priorities, including antisocial behaviour.

There are many funding streams that impact on antisocial behaviour. A more detailed account can be found in the report by the National Audit Office “Tackling Anti-Social Behaviour” (HC99 2006-07, December 2006). Other Home Office led activities also act to tackle antisocial behaviour, for example the introduction of community support officers, but a monetary value cannot be assigned to that contribution. Similarly, other Government Departments fund services that directly bear upon antisocial behaviour. For example the Crown Prosecution Service provides a network of specialist antisocial behaviour prosecutors, and Her Majesty's Court Service provides specialist antisocial behaviour response courts. There are many other programmes and services that contribute, sometimes indirectly, to tackling antisocial behaviour, including diversionary activities for young people, action against enviro-crime such as fly-tipping, neighbourhood wardens, as well as neighbourhood policing and neighbourhood management. A more detailed account can be found in the report of, and evidence to, the Home Affairs Select Committee's report on antisocial behaviour (Fifth Report, Session 2004-05, HC80).

£

Financial year

Total

Area

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Middlesbrough

71,500

132,314

388,060

591,874

Newcastle

84,232

252,411

445,000

781,643

South Tyneside

15,000

199,423

345,000

559,423

Sunderland

196,030

282,698

521,993

1,000,721

Darlington

77,208

268,000

345,208

Derwentside

190,000

190,000

Easington

53,000

60,954

115,000

228,954

Hartlepool

99,068

195,000

294,068

Redcar and Cleveland

315,000

315,000

Gateshead

53,000

60,000

175,000

288,000

Asylum: Sudan

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many Sudanese nationals have been refused asylum in the UK in each of the last 12 months; and how many are awaiting a decision on an asylum application. (228482)

The following table gives the most recently published figures available and shows the total number of refusals for Sudanese nationals, following initial decisions between July 2007 and June 2008.

The published figure for asylum applications split by nationality for people awaiting an initial decision is not available as the figures are based on an overall manual count which is not broken down into separate categories.

Information on asylum is published annually and quarterly. Annual statistics for 2007 and quarterly statistics for 2008 are available from the Library of the House and from the Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate website at:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration-asylum-stats.html

Asylum refusals on initial decisions1, 2 in the United Kingdom, excluding dependants July 2007 to June 2008 by month, nationals of Sudan

Sudan

Total refusals

2007

July

30

August

20

September

15

October

10

November

15

December

15

2008

January

10

February

10

March

15

April

5

May

15

June

10

1 Figures rounded to nearest 5.

2 Provisional figures.

Asylum: Zimbabwe

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many Zimbabwean nationals were refused asylum in the UK in each of the last 12 months; and how many are awaiting a decision on an asylum application. (228481)

The following table gives the most recently published figures available and shows the total number of refusals for Zimbabwean nationals, following initial decisions between July 2007 and June 2008.

The published figure for asylum applications split by nationality for people awaiting an initial decision is not available as the figures are based on an overall manual count which is not broken down into separate categories.

Information on asylum is published annually and quarterly. Annual Statistics for 2007 and quarterly statistics for 2008 are available from the Library of the House and from the Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate website at:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration-asylum-stats.html

Asylum refusals on initial decisions1, 2 in the United Kingdom, excluding dependants July 2007 to June 2008 by month, nationals of Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe

Total refusals

2007

July

135

August

85

September

65

October

85

November

105

December

70

2008

January

80

February

100

March

90

April

175

May

200

June

255

1 Figures rounded to nearest 5.

2 Provisional figures.

Border and Immigration Agency

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much was spent by the Border and Immigration Agency and its predecessor on (a) taxi fares, (b) hotel accommodation, (c) first class rail travel, (d) domestic and international flights and (e) hospitality in each of the last five years. (205453)

The amounts spent by the UK Border Agency and its predecessors on taxi fares, hotel accommodation, rail travel, domestic and international flights and hospitality in each of the last five years is shown in the following table. Rail travel includes all classes of travel.

£

2007-08

2006-07

2005-06

2004-05

2003-04

(a) Taxi fares

730,729

721,875

472,420

256,357

359,563

(b) Hotel accommodation

4,599,275

5,878,389

2,436,262

1,611,415

1531,452

(c) Train travel

3,208,649

4,505,231

3,145,729

2,066,521

732,135

(d) Air fares

1,688,398

1,965,205

2,405,574

1,775,290

845,104

(e) Hospitality

293,490

346,800

367,376

437,637

60,501

Total

10,520,541

13,417,500

8,827,361

6,147,220

2,528,7551

1 The financial record system in use at that time called BASS did not have a category to record hotel payments alone. This figure includes hotels and all subsistence, such as allowances for meals.

Cannabis: Crime

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what estimate she has made of the number of (a) murders, (b) assaults, (c) robberies and (d) other crimes committed while under the influence of skunk cannabis in (i) Lancashire and (ii) England and Wales in each of the last five years. (229072)

Departmental Civil Service Agencies

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many agencies were sponsored by her Department in (a) 2007-08 and (b) 1997-98. (228514)

The "Next Steps Report 1997" (Cm3889) provides information on all Executive agencies as at 31 December 1997. Copies are available from the Library of the House. The most up-to-date list of Executive agencies is published in the Cabinet Office publication "The List of Ministerial Responsibilities". The latest version, incorporating recent ministerial changes, will be published shortly. Copies will be placed in the Libraries of the House.

Departmental Official Visits

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much was spent on overnight accommodation by her Department's civil servants in the last 12 months. (228772)

Expenditure figures for the Home Office on overnight accommodation by civil servants and all Ministers for the financial year 2007-08 (the last 12 months for which audited figures are available) was £5.79 million.

Information on civil servant overnight accommodation expenditure separately could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Expenditure figures on overnight accommodation for the Home Office includes information for the core Home Office and UK Border Agency.

When travelling on departmental business officials are expected to make efficient and cost-effective accommodation arrangements. Departments have authority to reimburse the expenses incurred by their own staff in connection with their employment, subject to the conditions set out in the Civil Service Management Code.

Departmental Public Participation

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much (a) her Department and (b) the UK Border Agency and its predecessors spent on polling and focus groups in each of the last five years. (226058)

During the past five years, spend on opinion polling by the Home Office and the UK Border Agency and predecessors has been as follows (IND and BIA were the UKBA predecessors):

Spend on opinion polling (£)

2003-04

HO (Inc. IND)

128,850

2004-05

HO (Inc. IND)

124,610

2005-06

0

2006-07

Home Office

97,075

BIA

82,500

2007-08

Home Office

69,700

UKBA

45,000

We are unable to answer the question relating to focus groups on the grounds of disproportionate cost.

Departmental Public Relations

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the cost was of (a) entertainment, (b) advertising and promotion and (c) public relations consultancy to her Department in 2007-08. (228149)

Home Office spend on entertainment and advertising and promotion is set out in the following table. The Department's accounting systems do not identify separately the costs of public relations consultancy and these can be provided only at disproportionate cost.

£000

Entertainment

57

Advertising and promotion

8,144

All Home Office expenditure conforms to departmental guidance on financial procedures and propriety, which complies with the principles of Managing Public Money and the Treasury handbook on Regularity and Propriety.

Drugs: Afghanistan

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what estimate she has made of the proportion of Class A drugs sold on the streets of the UK which had originated in Afghanistan in the most recent period for which figures are available. (227930)

Afghanistan produces at least 90 per cent. of the identified heroin and opium supplied to the UK. The size of the UK's heroin street market has been estimated at £1.2 billion out of a total £4 billion for all Class A drugs. On that basis, drugs originating from Afghanistan represent between 25 and 30 per cent. of the value of the UK's Class A market.

Entry Clearances

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department for what reasons UK nationals acting as sponsors for overseas applicants applying for a UK visa are required to send personal financial information abroad for presentation by the applicant to Foreign and Commonwealth Office officials at the appropriate overseas embassy; what consideration has been given to enabling such sponsors to present information to officials in the UK; and if she will make a statement. (228476)

One of the requirements for entry in most immigration categories is that the applicant will either (a) be able to adequately maintain and accommodate himself/herself without recourse to public funds, or (b) be adequately maintained and accommodated without recourse to public funds by their sponsor, during their stay in the UK. Applicants are advised to provide evidence either of their own or their sponsor's ability to meet this requirement. Such evidence is submitted by the applicant not the sponsor. It is up to the sponsor whether to disclose the information.

UKvisas has become part of the UK Border Agency since 1 April and we shall look carefully at all the business processes to ensure they are as efficient and customer-friendly as possible.

Genetics: Databases

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many individuals who were (a) under 13 and (b) between (i) 13 and 15, (ii) 16 and 18 and (iii) 19 and 21 years of age had their DNA profiles added to the National DNA Database in each financial year for which records are available. (214981)

The following table shows the number of subject profiles loaded to the National DNA Database (NDNAD) in each of the last five years and the current year to date, as at 16 September 2008, for English and Welsh police forces, relating to persons who were (a) under 13 and (b) between (i) 13 and 15, (ii) 16 and 18 and (iii) 19 and 21 at the time the DNA sample was taken; and the estimated number of individuals to which these relate.

The number of subject profiles held is not the same as the number of individuals with a profile on the NDNAD. As it is possible for a person's profile to be loaded onto the NDNAD on more than one occasion, some profiles held on the NDNAD are replicates. This can occur, for example, if the person provided different names, or different versions of their name, on separate arrests, or because profiles are upgraded. Therefore, the number of individuals on the NDNAD is the number of subject profiles reduced by the replication rate, which at present is 13.3 per cent. for the whole NDNAD.

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

1 April to 16 September 2008

Profiles

Under 13

10,853

12,983

16,315

17,300

14,885

6,053

13-15

45,180

55,397

71,144

73,626

59,896

24,505

16-18

59,406

66,959

86,066

88,528

70,461

30,936

19-21

52,338

53,422

71,020

73,676

59,076

25,709

Estimated individuals

Under 13

9,410

11,256

14,145

14,999

12,905

5,248

13-15

39,171

48,029

61,682

63,834

51,930

21,246

16-18

51,505

58,053

74,619

76,754

61,090

26,822

19-21

45,377

46,317

61,574

63,877

51,219

22,290

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the cost was of adding DNA samples to the National DNA database in each year since 1995. (215821)

The process for adding information to the National DNA Database (NDNAD) has a number of elements, the costs of which fall to different parties. The process initially involves police taking a sample of a person’s cells (usually by means of a swab of the inside of the cheek), following which the sample is sent to a forensic supplier who processes it to produce a profile. This is a numerical sequence representing a small part of the person’s DNA. The profile is then added to the NDNAD, which operates to match profiles taken from individuals with those found at crime scenes.

The costs of taking and processing the sample fall to individual police forces. They vary depending on the contractual relationship between the force and the forensic supplier, which is commercially confidential.

The costs of operating the NDNAD and accrediting forensic suppliers fell, between 1995 and 2005 to the Forensic Science Service, between December 2005 and March 2007 to the Home Office, and since April 2007, to the National Policing Improvement Agency. For information on these costs, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to my hon. Friend the Member for Pendle (Mr. Prentice) on 1 September 2008, Official Report, columns 1566-67W.

Human Trafficking

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many of those (a) arrested for and (b) convicted of human trafficking offences in the UK were (i) male and (ii) female in each of the last five years. (228299)

Of the 253 people arrested since the inception of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 for human trafficking 79 were female and 174 male. Of these nine females have been convicted of human trafficking along with 81 males.

There have been a total of 90 convictions for human trafficking under the Sexual Offences Act. Of these 27 were female and 63 male.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the nationalities were of those (a) arrested and (b) convicted of human trafficking offences in the UK in each of the last five years. (228408)

The nationalities of those arrested and convicted are varied and include people from east Europe, south east Europe, south Asia, China and the far east, and Britain.

More detailed breakdowns of nationality are not yet available. However, work is underway by the UK Human Trafficking Centre to make details including case outcomes, age, gender and nationality of defendants available in due course.

Immigration: Bexley

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many applications for leave to remain have been received from addresses in (a) Bexleyheath and Crayford constituency and (b) the London Borough of Bexley in the last six months. (228239)

The following table shows the number of leave to remain applications received from addresses in Bexleyheath, Crayford and the London Borough of Bexley between 1 April 2008 and 30 September 2008.

Leave to remain applications received for Bexleyheath and Crayford 1 April 2008 to 30 September 2008

Number of applications

Bexleyheath

30

Crayford

90

Total

120

Leave to remain applications received for the London borough of Bexley 1 April 2008 to 30 September 2008

Number of applications

Borough of Bexley

1,075

Note:

Figures are rounded to the nearest five.

The figures quoted are not provided under National Statistics protocols and have been derived from local management information and are therefore provisional and subject to change.

Immigration: Children in Care

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what estimate she has made of the number of under 18-year-olds that arrived unaccompanied in the UK and were taken into care but subsequently went missing in (a) 2007 and (b) 1997. (229035)

I have been asked for reply.

The numbers of children looked after who went missing from local authority care in each of the last five years are shown in the following tables. Further information can be provided only at a disproportionate cost.

(a) The number of children looked after who went missing from care for 24 hours or more, in each of the years ending 31 March 2003 to 2007, including asylum-seeking children, was as follows:

Number

2003

990

2004

730

2005

860

2006

890

2007

950

These figures account for all children looked after excluding children looked after under an agreed series of short term placements.

(b) The number of asylum-seeking children who went missing from care for 24 hours or more, in each of the years ending 31 March 2003 to 2007, was as follows:

Number

2003

70

2004

50

2005

70

2006

110

2007

90

Note:

For both answers, where a child went missing from his or her agreed placement, for 24 hours or more, on more than one occasion during the same year, he or she has been counted only once.

The figures show the number of children looked after that went missing for a period of 24 hours or more. Some of these may have subsequently returned to care.

Immigration: Criminal Records

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what guidelines have been issued by her Department on the grant of indefinite leave to remain (ILR) under the legacy exercise to individuals with criminal convictions in the UK or in another country; what checks are carried out to ascertain the existence of a criminal record in (a) the UK and (b) another country in the case of those being considered for ILR under this exercise; and in this exercise how many people have been (i) found to have a criminal record in the UK, (ii) found to have a criminal record in another country, (iii) refused ILR because of a criminal record in the UK and (iv) refused ILR because of a criminal conviction in another country. (188653)

All decisions are made on a case by case basis under existing law and policy. The UK Border Agency’s website, as follows, provides details of policy and guidance that staff follow. This information is published as part of our commitment to freedom of information. Information on the number of cases found to be of those with criminal records in the UK and abroad (i-ii) and information on those refused ILR because of a criminal record in the UK and abroad (iii-iv) could be obtained by examination of individual case records only at disproportionate cost.

www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/policyandlaw/

Offenders: Deportation

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the average period of time was between a foreign national prisoner finishing their sentence and being deported in the last 12 months; and if she will make a statement. (196771)

The Chief Executive of the UK Border Agency advised the Home Affairs Committee in her letter of 23 July that the Agency is now removing or deporting around a fifth of all individuals direct from prison an average of 180 days before their release date. For the remaining individuals it is taking the Agency around 130 days, on average, to deport or remove them from the UK.

Offenders: Genetics

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many DNA samples were taken from people (a) charged and (b) cautioned (i) in each police area and (ii) in total in each of the last five years; and if she will make a statement. (198596)

The Criminal Justice Act 2003 (which came into effect in 2004) amended the Police and Criminal Evidence Act to give police the power to take a DNA sample from anyone arrested for a recordable offence and held in a police station. Since then, DNA samples have usually been taken following arrest, rather than at the later stages when a person is charged or cautioned. Information on the number of those from whom a DNA sample is taken who are later (a) charged and (b) cautioned is not available.

Official Residences

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the cost of (a) maintenance, (b) electricity, (c) heating and (d) other bills for the ministerial residence in South Eaton Place has been since it was vacated. (221191)

I refer the hon. Member to replies given on 17 March 2008, Official Report, column 807W and 28 April 2008, Official Report, column 100W.

Police: Football

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how football clubs are charged for the cost of policing during games; who is responsible for the level of such charges; and what criteria are used in such decisions; (227564)

(2) what her policy is on the scope of policing costs that football clubs should be liable for; and if she will make a statement;

(3) what estimate she has made of the proportion of costs of policing football matches and related fan movements not met by football clubs.

Policing at football matches in England and Wales is a special police services as provided for by section 25(1) of the Police Act 1996. That section provides that the local chief officer of police determines the need for and scale of any police deployment while the local police authority determines the scale of charges imposed for such deployments, section 25(1) is currently subject to judicial proceedings involving Greater Manchester Police and Wigan Athletic Football Club. We will consider carefully the interpretation of the court when it is available.

No record is held centrally of the cost of all football-related policing activity. 41 per cent. of all matches played in England and Wales during the 2007-08 football season were designated as 'police-free' on the basis of police risk assessment.

Sex Establishments: Regulation

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what powers are available to local authorities wishing to regulate the establishment of lap dancing clubs. (228889)

[holding answer 21 October 2008]: Lap dancing clubs that supply alcohol or provide entertainment in the form of music or dance must obtain an appropriate permission under the Licensing Act 2003 (the 2003 Act). If, following representations and a hearing, the licensing authority believes an application for a licence under the 2003 Act is contrary to the promotion of the four licensing objectives (prevention of crime and disorder, public safety, prevention of public nuisance and the protection of children from harm) it may refuse the application or grant the licence subject to conditions.

Lap dancing clubs are also subject to the law relating to public decency (Indecent Displays Act 1981) and brothel keeping (Sexual Offences Act 1956).

The planning system also provides local authorities with powers to help manage the number of lap dancing clubs in an area, having regard to local circumstances and any other material considerations. Following consultation with local authorities, the Home Secretary recently announced the Government’s intention to give local communities a stronger say over the establishment of lap dancing clubs in their area. A number of measures are currently being considered in order to achieve this.

Smuggling: Meat

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many meat detection sniffer dogs were in use at ports and airports in Great Britain on (a) 1 January and (b) 1 July in each year since 2002. (228519)

Detector dogs trained to identify products of animal origin (POAO) including meat were introduced by DEFRA in 2002, and were transferred to HMRC in April 2003. The number of POAO Detector dogs in use at ports and airports in Great Britain on 1 January and 1 July in each year since 2002 is set out as follows:

Number of dogs in use on 1January

Number of dogs in use on 1 July

2002

0

2

2003

2

2

2004

5

6

2005

10

10

2006

10

11

2007

11

11

2008

9

9

These dogs are employed on a mobile basis across Great Britain. The actual number available for deployment can differ according to the need to train new dogs and handlers, and to replace dogs through retirement and ill health.

We cannot disclose further information about the deployment of the dogs as this would provide information of value to those seeking to circumvent border controls, thereby prejudicing the prevention and detection of crime.

UK Border Agency: Data Protection

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what measures are in place to ensure that sensitive financial data required by the UK Border Agency to be sent overseas by those sponsoring applicants for visas is protected. (228648)

Where an applicant states that they will be maintained and accommodated in the UK by their sponsor, it is reasonable to expect the applicant to provide evidence of their sponsor's ability to do so. All supporting documents, including any documents provided by an applicant about their sponsor, are treated confidentially and in accordance with the provisions of the Data Protection Act by all UK visa-issuing posts overseas.

Health

Advisory Group on Hepatitis

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the (a) date of appointment and (b) expected date of end of term of office is of each member of (i) the Advisory Group on Hepatitis and (ii) the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation. (229620)

The information requested is shown in the following tables.

Advisory Group on Hepatitis

Name

Date of appointment1

Date of end of term2

Professor Howard Thomas (Chair)

1 November 1999

31 December 2008

Professor William Irving (Vice Chair)

1 July 1998

30 June 2009

Professor Margaret Bassendine

1 August 2005

31 July 2011

Mrs. Joan Bell

1 March 2007

28 February 2010

Professor Graham Foster

1 August 2005

31 July 2010

Mr. Christopher Liffen

1 August 2005

31 July 2010

Dr. Alan Mitchell

1 August 2005

31 July 2011

Dr. Peter Moss

1 August 2005

31 July 2011

Dr. Elizabeth Murphy

1 February 2008

31 January 2011

Dr. Christopher Packham

4 April 2008

3 April 2011

Mr. Raymond Poll

1 August 2005

31 July 2010

Dr. R. Nicholas Pugh

1 March 2007

28 February 2010

Professor Richard Tedder

1 April 2000

31 December 2009

Dr. C.Y. William Tong

1 March 2007

28 February 2010

Joint Committee on Immunisation and Vaccination

Name

Date of appointment1

Date of end of term2

Professor Andrew Hall (Chair)

1 January 2005

31 December 2009

Dr. Raymond Borrow

2 April 2007

1 April 2011

Professor Alan Emond

30 March 2003

29 March 20011

Professor Jonathan Friedland

28 February 2006

27 February 2010

Professor Paul Griffiths

30 September 2000

29 September 2008

Dr. Jennifer Harries

1 October 2008

30 September 2012

Dr. Anthony Harnden

28 February 2006

28 February 2010

Dr. Paul Jackson

28 February 2006

27 February 2010

Professor Simon Kroll

30 September 2000

29 September 2008

Dr. Gabriella Laing

1 October 2008

30 September 2012

Mrs. Pauline MacDonald

2 April 2007

1 April 2011

Ms Anne McGowan

2 April 2007

1 April 2011

Dr. Andrew Riordan

1 October 2008

30 September 2012

Mrs. Vivienne Parry

30 November 2002

29 November 2010

Dr. Richard Roberts

31 October 2003

30 October 2011

Professor Claire-Ann Siegrist

1 October 2008

30 September 2012

Dr. Ahmed Syed

28 February 2006

27 February 2010

Professor Brent Taylor

30 September 2000

29 September 2008

Dr. Christopher Verity

30 November 2001

29 November 2009

1 Date of first appointment. Some committee members have been re-appointed since their first appointment.

2 Date of when current appointment ends.

Alcoholic Drinks: Young People

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what recent discussions he has had with the alcoholic beverage industry on the health effects of underage drinking. (228998)

There have been no recent meetings with the alcohol beverage industry to discuss the health effects of underage drinking.

Cancer: Waiting Lists

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average waiting time was for cancer treatment in West Hertfordshire Hospital Trust area in the latest period for which figures are available. (228364)

Information is not held in the format requested. The cancer waiting time standards of a maximum wait of 31 days from decision to treat to first cancer treatment and a maximum of 62 days from an urgent general practitioner referral to the start of cancer treatment were introduced for all patients from December 2005. The latest figures, for quarter one 2008-09, show that West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust’s performance against the 31 days standard was 100 per cent., and its performance against the 62 day standard was 99.3 per cent.

Health: Gender

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what research his Department has (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated on the causes of health inequalities between men and women in the last 10 years; and whether any such research relates specifically to the Merseyside region. (228010)

None. The Department has however commissioned the Men’s Health Forum (MHF) to undertake a study into the different ways in which men and women access health services. The MHF report is due to be published this autumn.

Hepatitis

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when the public health guidelines on hepatitis B will be published. (229593)

I refer my hon. Friend to the written answer I gave the hon. Member for Eddisbury (Mr. O'Brien) on 6 October 2008, Official Report, columns 422-24W.

Iris London

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much was paid by his Department to Iris London in each financial year since 2001; which contracts were awarded by his Department to Iris London in each year since 2000-01; what the cost was of each contract; what penalties for default were imposed in contract provisions; what the length was of each contract; whether the contract was advertised; how many companies applied for the contract; how many were short-listed; what criteria were used for choosing a company; what provision was made for renewal without re-tender in each case; and if he will make a statement. (225714)

The Department procure marketing services and agencies through the Central Office of Information (COI). Iris London is the holding company, and COI have contracted with either Iris Nation (Sponsorship) or Iris Direct (Direct Marketing), not with the holding group.

Payments to Iris London and contracts awarded in each financial year since 2000-01 are detailed as follows. No penalties for default have been imposed in any of the contract provisions. In each case the initial length of contract is provided as is the number of agencies shortlisted in any tender.

2001-02

Teenage Pregnancies sponsorship—£99,438.40

(One year contract awarded after tender involving three agencies. This initial contract was commissioned by DCSF although sexual health is a joint DH/DCSF programme with shared objectives.)

2002-03

Teenage Pregnancies sponsorship—£111,765.00

(Contract extended)

Adult Sexual Health Partnership Marketing—£31,090.00

(One year contract awarded without tender due to Iris already working on Teenage Pregnancy sponsorship with DCSF.)

2003-04

Adult Sexual Health Partnership Marketing—£179,004.00

(Contract extended)

Teenage Pregnancies Partnership Marketing—£235,780.00

(Contract extended)

2004-05

Adult Sexual Health Partnership Marketing—£201,469.75

(Contract extended)

Teenage Pregnancies Partnership Marketing—£165,834.60

(Contract extended)

2005-06

Adult Sexual Health Partnership Marketing—£259,627.50

(Contract extended)

Teenage Pregnancies Partnership Marketing—£419,683.00

(Contract extended)

Tobacco Control Programme Partnership Marketing—£71,840.00

(Contract awarded for six months after tender involving three agencies)

2006-07

Adult Sexual Health Partnership Marketing—£663,005.21

(Contract extended)

Teenage Pregnancies Partnership Marketing—£402,988.60

(Contract extended)

Anti-Tobacco Partnership Marketing—£155,729.00

(Contract extended)

2007-08

Adult Sexual Health Partnership Marketing—£551,806.47

(Contract extended, repitched in July 2008 involving three agencies. Iris reappointed.)

Teenage Pregnancies Partnership Marketing—£346,465.68

(Contract extended, repitched in July 2008 involving three agencies. Iris reappointed.)

Anti-Tobacco Partnership Marketing—£200,540.75

(Contract extended)

COI is subject to the EU public procurement directive embodied in UK law by the Public Contract Regulations 2006. The Regulations govern the way in which Government contracts are advertised and awarded. For contracts over a threshold value it is a requirement for them to be advertised in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU), which imposes strict timescales that cannot be shortened. To enable the Department to appoint a supplier in the shortest possible time, COI have a number of framework agreements (agency rosters) in place. Frameworks are themselves advertised in the OJEU, therefore contracts awarded under the terms and conditions of the framework do not need to be re-advertised or apply the strict timescales—as long as timescales are reasonable to allow the suppliers time to provide an adequate response. The majority of the Department's spend with external suppliers is via these frameworks.

A detailed evaluation process is used for agency selection as part of any tender process. Key criteria for appointment of an agency and quality markers for a successful campaign are identified in conjunction with COI prior to any tender. Evaluation procedures are also utilised to continually evaluate agency performance against set objectives.

Renewal without re-tender has taken place in a number of cases. Each contract awarded is for a specific initial term usually relating to the allocated budget for that current financial year. Contracts have included the option for contract extension as stated in COI guidelines:

“COI reserves the right to extend the contract beyond the period stated above. Payment for any extension shall be based upon the Contract Price subject to fair and reasonable adjustment, to be agreed between COI and the Contractor”.

Medical Equipment

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which local authorities have decided to proceed with full implementation of transforming community equipment services following the recent trials. (229428)

Implementing the transforming community equipment service is a local decision and any information on decision-making should be referred to each local authority and health partnership.

NHS: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) nurses, (b) general practitioners, (c) surgeons, (d) ward support staff and (e) administrative staff were employed in the NHS in each year since 2004. (226865)

The data requested for nurses, general practitioners, surgeons (consultants), and administration staff are shown in the following table. It is not possible to break down data to indicate which support staff work on wards. Therefore all data on support staff are given.

NHS HCHS and General Practice work force (excluding GP retainers1) in England as at 30 September each specified year

Headcount

2004

2005

2006

2007

Total employed staff1

1,331,087

1,365,388

1,338,140

1,330,544

Professionally qualified clinical staff

660,706

679,157

674,621

681,246

All doctors1

117,036

122,345

125,612

127,645

Medical and dental staff within the surgical group of specialties

18,290

19,096

19,425

19,398

Of which:

Consultants

5,754

5,988

6,129

6,260

GPs1 Including registrars

34,085

35,302

35,369

35,855

Qualified nursing staff2

397,515

404,161

398,335

399,597

Qualified scientific, therapeutic and technical staff

128,883

134,534

134,496

136,976

Qualified ambulance staff

17,272

18,117

16,176

17,028

Support to clinical staff

251,176

254,533

235,710

227,349

Unqualified nursing staff

139,257

136,429

123,479

115,326

Unqualified ST and T staff

36,188

37,525

37,342

37,417

Healthcare assistants

41,740

43,280

41,747

43,055

Nursing areas of work

37,803

39,213

39,657

41,093

ST and T areas of work

905

964

925

781

Other areas of work

3,032

3,103

1,165

1,181

Support staff

33,991

35,299

33,142

31,551

Nursing areas of work

23,716

25,212

23,276

22,856

ST and T areas of work

1,241

1,118

1,231

1,110

Other areas of work

9,034

8,969

8,635

7,585

Total clerical and administrative staff3

260,857

272,565

261,053

256,686

Central functions

129,249

136,513

130,559

128,620

Hotel, property and estates

10,827

10,762

9,099

8,818

ST and T support

17,356

16,587

15,282

14,391

Clerical support

99,845

105,004

102,486

101,125

Ambulance service support

3,580

3,699

3,627

3,732

Other non-medical staff4

46,094

47,039

47,114

47,888

Other GP practice staff5

90,110

89,190

95,845

94,515

1 Figures exclude GP Retainers.

2 Nursing and midwifery figures exclude students on training courses leading to a first qualification as a nurse or midwife. Includes GP practice nurses.

3 Examples of staff in Central Functions are staff in HR, informatics, payroll, and library staff. Examples of staff in Hotel, property and estates are clerical laundry staff, domestic services and home wardens. Examples of staff in ST and T support are clerical staff in audiology, haematology, dietetics and microbiology. Ambulance service support staff are ambulance controllers, training staff and ambulance officers.

4 Other non-medical staff includes ambulance support staff, maintenance and works staff and a small number of other and unknown staff.

5 Other practice staff—There is no breakdown of type of work for headcount data. However type of work is available for full time equivalent practice staff and the majority (over 60 per cent. in 2007) were admin and clerical staff.

Notes:

1. In 2006 ambulance staff were collected under new, more detailed, occupation codes. As a result qualified totals and support to ambulance staff totals are not directly comparable with previous years.

2. Data qualify: Work force statistics are compiled from data sent by more than 300 NHS trusts and primary care trusts (PCTs) In England. The NHS Information Centre for hearth and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data. Processing methods and procedures are continually being updated to improve data quality. Where this happens any impact on figures already published will be assessed but unless this is significant at national level they will not be changed. Where there is impact only at detailed or local level this will be footnoted in relevant analyses.

Sources:

The NHS Information Centre for health and social care Medical and Dental Workforce Census

The NHS Information Centre for health and social care Non-Medical Workforce Census

The NHS Information Centre for health and social care General and Personal medical services statistics

Obesity

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 6 October 2008, Official Report, column 457W on Health: obesity, which public service agreements published by the Government between 1998 and 2004 were related to levels of obesity; and what evidence he has assessed on the effect these targets have had on levels of obesity. (228979)

I refer the hon. Member to my reply of 6 October 2008, Official Report, column 457W.

The Government commissioned the Foresight team to undertake a detailed analysis on obesity in the United Kingdom. The Foresight report “Tackling Obesities: Future Choices”, which has been placed in the Library, set out the long-term scale of the obesity problem, and its complexities. In response, we have set a new ambition, and developed a new strategy “Healthy Weight”, “Healthy Lives: a Cross-Government Strategy for England”, which we published in January this year. This has already been placed in the Library.

Obesity: Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Health for what reasons the Government did not set a target to reduce levels of obesity in children between 1997 and 2004. (228994)

I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave on 6 October 2008, Official Report, column 457W.

A public service agreement (PSA) target was set in 2004 to halt the year on year rise in obesity among children aged 11 by 2010 in the context of a broader strategy to tackle obesity in the population as a whole.

Patients: Safety

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what progress is being made towards (a) designation of specialised services to guarantee patient safety and (b) ensuring that service staff are used effectively in accordance with his Department’s operating framework for 2008-09. (228651)

The process of designating the providers of specialised services is being undertaken as part of the work programme of the National Specialised Commissioning Group, which has issued guidance to Specialised Commissioning Groups (SCGs) on its expected approach. This includes model documentation—to ensure that the process is fair and transparent. Such documentation will need to cover details of the service model, service standards, patient access and egress criteria and treatment protocols, and information requirements. It will also need to be discussed with patient groups. The work of producing model documentation for the first 15 services has been divided between different SCGs. A further eight services will be designated following some form of nationally co-ordinated review (e.g. burn care or rare cancers).

Prostate Cancer

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what steps his Department has taken to ensure that cancer networks adhere to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidance on prostate cancer; (229316)

(2) has taken to ensure that prostate cancer patients are reviewed by multi-disciplinary teams in all primary care trusts.

Improving Outcomes in Urological Cancer, published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in 2002, addresses the care of prostate cancer patients.

Strategic health authorities have submitted action plans to demonstrate how they will implement this guidance. The Department and the Healthcare Commission monitor progress against these plans.

The most recent round of peer review visits confirmed that the care of most cancer patients is managed by multidisciplinary teams, one of the key principles of the Improving Outcomes series of guidance.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much funding is available for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer in (a) England, (b) each strategic health authority area and (c) each primary care trust in 2008-09. (229317)

It is the responsibility of each primary care trust (PCT) to commission healthcare services for their local populations, including the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer, using the funds allocated to them in their baseline allocations.

A table showing the revenue allocations made to each PCT in 2008-09 has already been placed in the Library.

The following table shows the total revenue allocation provided to each strategic health authority (SHA) area in 2008-09 and the overall total for England.

SHA

2008-09 recurrent allocation (£000)

East Midlands SHA

5,900,035

East of England SHA

7,494,446

London SHA

12,245,265

North East SHA

4,134,810

North West SHA

10,904,960

South Central SHA

5,148,563

South East Coast SHA

5,952,479

South West SHA

7,056,315

West Midlands SHA

7,827,382

Yorkshire and the Humber SHA

7,533,215

England

74,197,471

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many clinical nurse specialists for prostate cancer there were in (a) England, (b) each strategic health authority area and (c) each primary care trust area in each year since 1997. (229319)

The information requested is unavailable. Work force planning is a matter for local determination. It is for local service providers and work force planners to determine the needs of their local populations for clinical nurses specialists for prostate cancer.

Thame Community Hospital: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when he expects to (a) announce the amount of funding Thame Community Hospital, Oxfordshire, will receive from the Community Hospital Development Fund and (b) make public information on the draw-down terms associated with such funding. (229332)

The Department has authorised a contribution from the community hospitals and services programme central fund of £4 million for the redevelopment of Thame Community Hospital and the local NHS is progressing the scheme. The draw down of funding is subject to the normal business case processes.

The new hospital will offer local people better access to wide range of local services and diagnostics, in high quality, up to date, facilities.

Tuberculosis: Vaccination

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which countries are classified as possessing a level of tuberculosis infection sufficient to justify the treatment of their nationals as a high risk group under the new guidelines for the national BCG vaccination programme. (228988)

The Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination programme offers the BCG vaccine to those at greatest risk of exposure. These are:

all infants (aged 0 to 12 months) living in areas of the UK where the annual incidence of tuberculosis (TB) is 40 in 100,000 or greater;

all infants (aged 0 to 12 months) with a parent or grandparent who was born in a country where the annual incidence of TB is 40 in 100,000 or greater;

previously unvaccinated children aged one to five years with a parent or grandparent who was born in a country where the annual incidence of TB is 40 in 100,000 or greater. These children should be identified at suitable opportunities, and can normally be vaccinated without tuberculin testing;

previously unvaccinated, tuberculin-negative children aged from six to under 16 years of age with a parent or grandparent who was born in a country where the annual incidence of TB is 40 in 100,000 or greater. These children should be identified at suitable opportunities, tuberculin tested and vaccinated if negative;

previously unvaccinated tuberculin-negative contacts of cases of respiratory TB; and

previously unvaccinated, tuberculin-negative new entrants under 16 years of age who were born in or who have lived for a prolonged period (at least three months) in a country with an annual TB incidence of 40 in 100,000 or greater.

BCG may be required for previously unvaccinated, tuberculin negative individuals according to the destination and nature of travel. BCG vaccine is recommended for those under 16 years of age who are going to live or work with local people for more than three months in a country where the annual incidence of TB is 40 in 100,000 or greater.

The following countries have an annual incidence of TB equal to or greater than 40 in 100,000 people.

Afghanistan

Algeria

Angola

Armenia

Azerbaijan

Bahrain

Bangladesh

Belarus

Belize

Benin

Bhutan

Bolivia

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Botswana

Brazil

Brunei Darussalam

Bulgaria

Burkina Faso

Burundi

Cambodia

Cameroon

Cape Verde

Central African Republic

Chad

China

China, Hong Kong SAR

China, Macao SAR

Colombia

Comoros

Congo

Cote d'Ivoire

Croatia

Djibouti

Dominican Republic

DPR Korea

DR Congo

Ecuador

El Salvador

Equatorial Guinea

Eritrea

Ethiopia

Gabon

Gambia

Georgia

Ghana

Guatemala

Guinea

Guinea-Bissau

Guyana

Haiti

Honduras

India

Indonesia

Iraq

Kazakhstan

Kenya

Kiribati

Kyrgyzstan

Lao PDR

Latvia

Lesotho

Liberia

Lithuania

Madagascar

Malawi

Malaysia

Maldives

Mali

Marshall Islands

Mauritania

Micronesia

Mongolia

Morocco

Mozambique

Myanmar

Namibia

Nauru

Nepal

Nicaragua

Niger

Nigeria

Niue

Northern Mariana Islands

Pakistan

Palau

Panama

Papua New Guinea

Paraguay

Peru

Philippines

Qatar

Rep. of Korea

Republic of Moldova

Romania

Russian Federation

Rwanda

Sao Tome & Principe

Saudi Arabia

Senegal

Sierra Leone

Solomon Islands

Somalia

South Africa

Sri Lanka

Sudan

Suriname

Swaziland

Tajikistan

Thailand

Timor-Leste

Togo

Tokelau

Turkmenistan

Tuvalu

Uganda

Ukraine

UR Tanzania

Uzbekistan

Vanuatu

Venezuela

Viet Nam

Wallis and Futuna

Yemen

Zambia

Zimbabwe

Source:

World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Control: Surveillance, Planning, Financing. WHO Report 2008. Geneva, WHO/HTM/TB/2008.393. www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the rate of tuberculosis infection was among children under 11 years of age in each of the last five years. (228989)

The available information is in the following table.

Number of cases aged 0-10 years

Rate of TB per 100,000 population

2002

263

4.10

2003

209

3.30

2004

277

4.44

2005

292

4.61

2006

246

3.93

Notes: 1. The data provided are for England only. 2. They are for children aged 0-10 years inclusive. 3. Validated data for 2007 are not yet available. Source: Health Protection Agency Enhanced Tuberculosis Surveillance (ETS) system. Mid-year population estimates were compiled from Office of National Statistics (ONS) data.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate he has made of (a) the number of children who will be vaccinated under the revised guidelines for the national BCG vaccination programme and (b) the cost of the revised programme. (228990)

There were nearly 220,000 Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccinations in 2007-08 (NHS Immunisation Statistics, England 2007-08).

The cost of administering the programme is included in primary care trusts' overall budget and cannot be separated out.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the reasons are for moving to a policy of selective rather than universal vaccination of children against tuberculosis. (229725)

The Department moved to a selective policy following advice from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI).

Having reviewed all available scientific and epidemiological evidence, the JCVI recommended from September 2005 that a targeted approach to vaccination should be introduced to replace the national schools Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) programme.

The key reasons behind this decision were:

the primary role of the BCG vaccination is to protect individuals at high risk of exposure to tuberculosis (TB);

since the introduction of the schools based BGC programme the epidemiology of TB has changed from a disease of the general population in the 1950s to one of predominately high-risk groups;

targeted BCG vaccination means that the majority of children at high risk of TB exposure will now be vaccinated earlier in life than under the previous policy;

the BCG is most effective at preventing severe forms of TB in infants and young children; and

protection decreases with time but repeated vaccination does not appear to offer any additional protection.

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Bangladesh: Religious Freedom

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions he has with the government of Bangladesh on outbreaks of violence against Christians and other religious minorities. (227644)

We are not aware of any recent major outbreaks of violence against Christians or other religious minorities in Bangladesh. However, we continue to monitor the situation closely. The UK condemns the persecution of individuals or groups because of their faith or belief. We take very seriously issues of discrimination on grounds of religion and press for adherence to the principles of religious freedoms enshrined in the UN Charter and international conventions.

Burma: Arms Trade

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions he has had with the Government of India on arms sales to the Government of Burma. (228185)

The matter was raised with the Indian Government last year when we became aware that India had sold arms to Burma. If further sales come to our attention, we will again raise our concerns. The EU has an arms embargo against Burma and calls on all countries to consider carefully whether arms which are used against civilians should be sold to Burma.

We continue to raise the need for political change in Burma with the Indian Government at the highest levels. We hope that, as the world’s largest democracy, India will use the influence that it has on the Burmese regime to encourage the start of an inclusive political process leading to genuine democracy and respect for human rights.

Burma: Human Rights

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations he has made to the Government of Burma about the incidence of human rights abuses in that country since 22nd July 2008. (228213)

As part of the EU Common Position, we do not engage at ministerial level with the regime in Burma. Our ambassador in Rangoon has met Burmese officials on a number of occasions since 22 July to raise our concerns about the human rights situation in the country. Recent exchanges have focused on prisoner welfare, the release of political prisoners and the need for a genuinely inclusive political process. The ambassador also discussed specific abuses inflicted on Burma’s ethnic groups with Professor Gambari during the UN envoy’s visit in August.

Burma: Overseas Aid

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions he has had with his ASEAN counterparts on the supply of military police and security equipment to the Government of Burma. (228215)

We are aware of reports that the Government of Burma has purchased military and security equipment from some Association of South-East Asia Nations (ASEAN) countries. Burma is subject to an EU arms embargo and we encourage all countries, including members of ASEAN, to observe responsible arms trade policies towards Burma and other countries whose activities may be a cause for concern.

We regularly urge ASEAN countries to do all they can to promote respect for human rights and a genuine transition to democracy in Burma. Most recently, my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary discussed these issues with the Foreign Ministers of Singapore, Thailand and Indonesia, and the Secretary-General of ASEAN during a meeting with the UN Secretary-General on 27 September in New York.

Burma: Political Prisoners

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent reports he has received on the number of political prisoners in Burma. (228212)

In his report to the UN General Assembly of 5 September 2008, the UN Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in Burma stated that

“according to reliable sources, some 2,000 political and civil activists were still imprisoned in Myanmar”.

This is consistent with other reports the Foreign and Commonwealth Office has received. We continue to raise the need for the immediate and unconditional release of all political prisoners, including Aung San Suu Kyi, in all our contacts with the Burmese regime and those countries with influence over it.

Burma: Politics and Government

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions he has had with the Chinese Government on the conduct of the Government of Burma. (228211)

My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister raised our deep concern about the situation in Burma with Chinese Premier Wen on 24 September, during UN General Assembly Ministerial week in New York. He also raised Burma with both Premier Wen and President Hu in Beijing in August. My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary discussed Burma with Foreign Minister Yang on 12 June, and will raise the issue again when they meet at the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) summit in Beijing later this month. Officials maintain an active dialogue with the Chinese Government through our embassies in Beijing and Rangoon, and with the Chinese embassy in London. In all these discussions, we have consistently encouraged China to bring its influence to bear on the Burmese regime to respond to the demands of the UN Security Council and broader international community.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions he has had with the Government of Burma on the outcome of the most recent visit to Burma by the UN special rapporteur. (228218)

The UN Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in Burma visited the country between 3 and 7 August and delivered a report of his observations to the UN General Assembly on 5 September 2008. Ministerial contact with the regime is restricted by the EU Common Position on Burma. However, our ambassador in Rangoon regularly raises our deep concern about the human rights situation, including the issues highlighted in the Special Rapporteur’s report. We also support the work of the Special Rapporteur through the Human Rights Council and the UN General Assembly.

Burma: UN Resolutions

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions he has had with his EU counterparts on the pursuit of a United Nations Security Council resolution on Burma since 22 July 2008. (228214)

In the past 12 months we have helped to secure unprecedented UN Security Council action on Burma in the form of two strongly-worded presidential statements demanding: the release of political prisoners; the start of credible talks between the regime, opposition and ethnic groups; and full co-operation with the UN. We continue to work with EU partners to keep Burma on the UN Security Council agenda. A UN Security Council Resolution in the short term is not feasible as some members, including permanent members, will block action on this front. We have not discussed this specific issue with EU partners since 22 July 2008.

Colombia: Arms Trade

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of the prospects of securing an EU embargo on arms supplies to Colombia. (228203)

There has been no discussion among EU partners about an EU arms embargo on Colombia. All export licence applications to export arms to Colombia are rigorously assessed on a case by case basis against the Consolidated EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria.

Diplomatic Service: Passports

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many valid UK diplomatic passports are held by (a) serving accredited UK diplomats, (b) other Foreign and Commonwealth Office officials, (c) serving military personnel, (d) officials of other Government Departments, (e) Ministers of the Crown, (f) hon. Members who do not hold ministerial office and (g) others. (223409)

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office does not keep separate records of diplomatic and official passports issued, nor does it break down how many passports are issued to staff and dependants who are not members of the Diplomatic Service.

A manual check of all diplomatic and official passport application forms would be required to provide this information. This would incur a disproportionate cost.

Foreign and Commonwealth Office practice is to issue diplomatic passports to officers who are to serve as diplomatic agents abroad. Official passports are issued to those who are to serve as administrative or technical staff. The guidelines under which they are to be issued are rigorously defined to accredited personnel and dependants on overseas postings. Diplomatic and official passports are issued to staff other than members of the Diplomatic Service, given that it is not only diplomatic staff that go on overseas postings.

Ethiopia: Arms Trade

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what the Government’s policy is on the sale of arms to Ethiopia. (228184)

The Minister for Africa, the Middle East and Asia announced the Government’s policy on export licensing in a PQ answer on 26 October 2000, Official Report, columns 199-203W.

In summary, all relevant export licence applications, including those of arms to Ethiopia, are rigorously assessed on a case by case basis against the consolidated EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria, taking account of the circumstances prevailing at the time and other relevant announced Government policies.

An export licence will not be issued if the arguments for doing so are outweighed by the need to comply with the UK’s international obligations and commitments, by concern that the goods might be used for internal repression or international aggression, by the risks to regional stability or by other considerations as described in the EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria.

Guatemala: Human Rights

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent reports he has received on extrajudicial killing in Guatemala. (228217)

According to statistics from the non-governmental organization, Grupo de Apoyo Mutuo, there were 94 extrajudicial killings in Guatemala, in the first nine months of 2008. Against the country’s overall murder rate, official statistics show to date, 3,621 murders in 2008 and 5,000 in the previous year, of which fewer than 3 per cent. of the perpetrators brought to justice.

President Colom, who came to power in January 2008, has taken steps to address these high levels of violent crime and impunity. He replaced the Minister of the Interior, the Attorney General and most recently, the Director and Deputy Director of the National Police. The new Director of Police is working to purge the service of officers linked to corruption and organised crime. The British embassy in Guatemala City supports these efforts, and the work of the UN-sponsored International Commission on Corruption and Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG) which recently completed its first year of activities.

India: Christianity

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions he has had with the Indian Government on the alleged persecution of Christians in Orissa state; and if he will make a statement. (226082)

We are deeply concerned by the recent reports of attacks against Christians in Orissa. There can be no justification for such violent attacks against innocent people. On 1 October, my noble Friend the Minister of State for Asia, Africa and the UN, Lord Malloch-Brown raised the matter with the Indian High Commissioner and on 17 October he raised it in Delhi with the Minister of External Affairs, Arnand Sharma. He also used his recent visit to India to raise it with the chairman of the Minorities Commission, Mr. Mohammed Quereshi. We understand that the Indian Government fully recognise the seriousness of these incidents and are engaged with the Orissa State authorities in restoring law and order to that region.

India: Terrorism

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what reports he has received of terrorist attacks in India over the last 12 months, broken down by (a) location and (b) community affected. (226236)

We have received reports of numerous terrorist attacks in India over the last 12 months. The most significant have been:

23 November 2007: Varanasi, Faizabad and Lucknow in Uttar Pradesh, killing 13 people

13 May 2008: Jaipur, killing 80

25 July 2008: Bangalore, killing two

26 July 2008: Ahmedabad, killing 49

13 September 2008: Delhi, five serial bomb blasts killed at least 23 and injured over 100

27 September 2008: South Delhi, killing two and injuring two dozen

29 September 2008: Modasa (Gujarat), and Malegaon (Maharashtra), killing four and injuring 51

1 October 2008: Agartala (Tripura), injuring 50

The multi-ethnic and multicultural character of Indian society means it is not possible to single out which communities have been affected.

There have been several other low-level attacks in India over the last 12 months. Notably, Naxalite activity has registered consistently high levels of violence in recent years, averaging around 1,500 incidents and 800 deaths each year since 2003. These are higher casualty figures than for Jammu and Kashmir and the insurgencies in Northeast India.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what support the Government is providing to India to assist counter-terrorism activities in India; and if he will make a statement. (226238)

The UK and India enjoy a close working relationship on countering terrorism and extremism. This is underpinned by Prime Ministerial agreement at annual UK/India summits to work together in specific areas.

At the most recent summit in January we agreed to intensify practical co-operation and the sharing of experience in the fight against terrorism. We have agreed to build on existing co-operation, including in the protection of critical national infrastructure, mass transit systems and the security of major sporting events including the 2010 Delhi Commonwealth Games and the London 2012 Olympics. In addition, we have agreed to expand co-operation on civil aviation security and crisis management, and to establish a new bilateral dialogue on terrorist financing. Practical work is now being taken forward across the UK and Indian Governments. We expect to further strengthen this co-operation through a meeting of the Indo-UK Joint Working Group on Counter-Terrorism later this year.

Multilaterally, the UK and India remain committed to pursuing an agreement in the UN on the Comprehensive Convention against International Terrorism. The UK continues to support India’s request for full membership of the Financial Action Task Force.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what mechanisms are in place for co-operation with the Indian Government on intelligence relating to (a) the causes of and (b) the perpetrators of terrorism in India. (226240)

It is the long-standing policy of the Government not to comment on intelligence matters.

We value our co-operation with India across a range of counter-terrorism issues and we expect to further strengthen co-operation through a meeting of the Indo-UK Joint Working Group on Counter-Terrorism later this year.

International Criminal Court

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what the (a) projected and (b) maximum number of investigations and trials is the International Criminal Court could undertake under its present budget and strategic plans. (224638)

The Registrar of the International Criminal Court (ICC) draws up a budget for each calendar year for approval by States Parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC. The budget is prepared on the basis of assumptions about the level of activity for the following year. The overall budget for 2008 of €90.4 million was drawn up on the expectation that at least one trial would take place; and that the Office of the Prosecutor would continue to pursue investigations in four situations (relating to the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Central African Republic, Uganda and Sudan/Darfur). Following the arrest and surrender of two further individuals to the ICC, the Registrar sought permission, in accordance with the ICC Financial Regulations and Rules, to use the court’s contingency fund to meet the unforecast costs relating to a second trial in 2008. This was approved but, as the first trial has now been delayed, the costs for that second trial are likely to be met within the existing 2008 budget.

The budget for 2009 has not yet been finalised, but the court will base its planned expenditure on the assumptions that: two trials will take place consecutively; there will be some pre-trial activities for a third; and the Prosecutor will continue investigations in three of the situations currently before the court, with no new investigations envisaged.

Iran: Banks

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will place in the Library a copy of the list of banks domiciled in Iran, including their branches and subsidiaries abroad, that was distributed to UN Security Council members by the United Kingdom, the United States and France on 1 August. (225586)

Kenya: Politics and Government

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent assessment he has made of the political situation in Kenya; and if he will make a statement. (227284)

Kenya has returned to stability following the violence earlier this year that arose from the disputed December 2007 elections. The new Grand Coalition Government has made some progress towards implementing the agenda for reform agreed by all parties during Kofi Annan’s mediation process. Achieving the agreed benchmarks for reform along with early steps to tackle the issues that underlay the violence, such as poverty, inequality and impunity, will ensure confidence in a commitment to the process. As my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister said after meeting Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga on 23 July 2008, we welcome the commitment of the political parties in Kenya to power-sharing and their efforts to live up to the expectations of the Kenyan people. The Government, with their international partners, are working to assist Kenya with their reform agenda in the pursuit of longer-term stability and growth, and to prevent such violence recurring.

Pakistan: Politics and Government

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent steps the Government have taken to assist the Government of Pakistan in reducing the incidence of extremism in that country. (224998)

My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister discussed the problem of extremism in Pakistan with President Zardari on 16 September. He offered Pakistan the UK's full support, including through support for development, capacity-building and counter-terrorism cooperation.

We continue to work with Pakistan to help tackle the serious development, security and economic problems that Pakistan faces. The UK and Pakistan have a broad programme of counter-terrorism cooperation. This includes providing operational support in key law enforcement and prosecuting agencies. We will also be doubling development spending in Pakistan to £480 million over the next three years to help strengthen democratic institutions, promote good governance, provide better quality education and increase health care provision. This assistance should also help to address some of the underlying causes of radicalisation.

Pakistan: Religious Freedom

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent reports he has received of incidents involving the alleged persecution of the Ahmadiyya Muslim community in Pakistan; and when he last raised the subject with the Government of Pakistan. (226091)

Members of the Ahmadiyya community in the United Kingdom recently informed us about comments made on a popular Pakistani television programme inciting violence against their community. Within several days, two prominent members of the Ahmadiyya community in Karachi were killed. Our deputy high commission in Karachi discussed this with the provincial Sindh Government, who are investigating the broadcast.

With our EU partners, we regularly raise concerns about the treatment of all minority groups with the Government of Pakistan. The last specific intervention by the EU on the persecution of the Ahmaddiya community took place in July.

Sudan: Arms Trade

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the UN arms embargo on Sudan. (228179)

We note that the latest report, published on 3 October 2007, of the UN Panel of Exports (which monitors the UN arms embargo) identified violations of the embargo. The UK continues to request that the UN extend its arms embargo on Darfur to all of Sudan, but not all Security Council members agree.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what reports he has received on (a) compliance with and (b) breaches of the UN arms embargo on Darfur. (228187)

In its latest report of 3 October 2007, the UN Panel of Experts (which was established by UN Security Council Resolution 1591 to monitor the arms embargo on Darfur) assessed that violations of the arms embargo continued, both by the Government of Sudan and non-State armed groups, during the period of the report (29 September 2006 to 29 August 2007). The Panel reported that heavy weapons (artillery pieces), small arms, ammunition and other military equipment were entering Darfur from other countries. The Panel further reported that the Government of Sudan had not submitted the necessary requests of approval to the UN to enable the movement of weapons, ammunition or other military equipment into Darfur, thereby knowingly violating the provisions of the Resolution.

The UK continues to request that the UN extend its arms embargo on Darfur to all of Sudan, but not all Security Council members agree. The EU has implemented an arms embargo on the whole of Sudan via Common Position 2005/411/CFSP.

Sudan: Elections

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps the Government have taken to facilitate free and fair elections in Sudan as outlined in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement. (227612)

As Chair of the donor working group on elections in Khartoum, we work with other donors and the UN to lobby the Government of Sudan to amend key legislation on national security, the media and political parties to create an environment for free and fair elections.

The UK has supported civic education and media training programmes since late 2007. We will contribute an initial £1.5 million to the UN elections programme to fund civic and voter education, civil society training, and training for electoral staff.

We regularly raise the issue of elections, and emphasise the need for elections to be free and fair, with Government and opposition parties in north and south Sudan.

Sudan: Peacekeeping Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what his policy is on the establishment of a no-fly zone over Darfur. (228188)

We are not currently proposing a no-fly zone for Darfur. We assess that a no-fly zone would restrict essential humanitarian operations and be a major logistical challenge due to the size of Darfur and the lack of available air assets. The UN-African Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) is mandated to monitor military activity, including flights prohibited by UN Security Council Resolution 1591. We continue to press all parties for the rapid and full deployment of UNAMID.

Sudan: Politics and Government

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent discussions he has had with (a) the Russian Government and (b) the Chinese Government on the political and security situation in Darfur. (228178)

My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary discussed Darfur with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang on 27 September in New York.

We have regular discussions with the officials of the Russian and Chinese Governments about Darfur. We have urged them to support the effective deployment of the UN-African Union Mission in Darfur and to use their influence with the Government of Sudan to press Sudan to fulfil its commitments and end the violence.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent assessment he has made of the political situation in Darfur; and if he will make a statement. (228190)

The new UN-African Union Chief Mediator for the Darfur political process, Djibril Bassolé, former Foreign Minister of Burkina Faso, arrived in Sudan on 28 August. This is a welcome step in renewing the Darfur political process. We stand ready to support him in his efforts to reinvigorate the peace process.

Following the application by the International Criminal Court's Prosecutor for an arrest warrant for President Bashir on 14 July, the Government of Sudan announced plans for a "Sudan People's Initiative" on Darfur which held its first meeting on 16 October. The Government of Qatar and the Arab League have also announced that they want to work on a peace initiative for Darfur. We hope these initiatives will support the efforts of the UN-African Union Chief Mediator and lead to a sustainable peace.

Sudan: Travel Information

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what procedures his Department uses to compile its advice on travel to Sudan. (227611)

Foreign and Commonwealth Travel Advice is under constant review. It is thoroughly checked at least once every month and following any significant incident.

The aim of the Travel Advice for Sudan, as with elsewhere, is to provide information to enable British nationals to make informed decisions about their safety abroad.

The Travel Advice for all countries is based on information from experts. The National Travel Health Network and Centre advise on all health matters, the Met Office on weather fronts, the Department of Transport on aviation issues and our Posts and geographical desks provide a wealth of in-country expertise. Information from the intelligence services is also sought. All of the expert advice will be considered as part of the procedures prior to updating the Travel Advice.

For significant changes to the Travel Advice, including where a travel warning is put in place or removed, ministerial approval is required. We only advise against travel or all but essential travel to a country when we believe the threats are such that the safety of British travellers is at risk.

The Travel Advice for Sudan was last updated on 6 October 2008.

Written Questions: Government Responses

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he will reply to question 220187, on staff, tabled on 15 July. (226918)

This PQ was answered on 20 October 2008, Official Report, column 96W. I apologise for the delay.

Duchy of Lancaster

Prostate Cancer

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many diagnoses of prostate cancer there were in (a) England, (b) each strategic health authority area and (c) each primary care trust area in each year since 1997. (229318)

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.

Letter from Colin Mowl, dated October 2008:

The National Statistician has been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking how many diagnoses of prostate cancer there were in (a) England, (b) each strategic health authority area and (c) each primary care trust area in each year since 1997. I am replying in her absence. [229318]

The latest available figures for newly diagnosed cases of prostate cancer are for the year 2005. Figures for 1997 to 2005 for (a) England, (b) each strategic health authority area and (c) each primary care trust area are given in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Registrations of newly diagnosed cases of malignant neoplasm of prostate1, males: England, strategic health authorities and primary care organisations grouped within strategic health authorities2,3 1997 to 2005

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

England

19,940

20,428

22,297

24,415

27,724

27,878

28,074

30,320

28,886

North East SHA

894

1,064

1,231

1,248

1,410

1,393

1,488

1,347

1,403

North West SHA

2,554

2,627

2,843

3,105

3,655

3,533

3,626

4,402

4,293

Yorkshire and the Humber SHA

1,859

1,823

1,931

2,379

2,655

2,620

2,669

2,998

2,729

East Midlands SHA

1,465

1,531

1,749

1,942

2,121

2,143

2,104

2,498

2,619

West Midlands SHA

2,085

2,247

2,415

2,727

3,083

3,241

3,274

3,502

3,350

East of England SHA

2,256

2,272

2,627

2,957

3,222

3,304

3,247

3,293

3,453

London SHA

2,602

2,666

2,753

2,820

3,103

3,147

3,119

3,174

2,875

South East Coast SHA

2,090

2,001

2,238

2,305

2,472

2,340

2,324

2,439

2,317

South Central SHA

1,487

1,642

1,826

2,069

2,389

2,390

2,350

2,588

2,169

South West SHA

2,648

2,555

2,684

2,863

3,614

3,767

3,873

4,079

3,678

North East SHA

County Durham

180

206

174

204

248

233

264

254

247

Darlington

47

46

66

47

39

69

58

55

47

Gateshead

74

98

114

94

116

126

120

101

148

Hartlepool

34

36

43

40

47

45

60

48

36

Middlesbrough

77

70

77

71

83

48

96

88

103

Newcastle

77

102

116

152

127

182

127

123

91

North Tees

42

63

83

82

87

88

76

75

79

North Tyneside

72

74

92

126

134

122

142

125

106

Northumberland

93

146

157

161

247

198

201

180

229

Redcar and Cleveland

64

52

93

101

85

83

111

98

97

South Tyneside

47

47

57

51

52

73

76

60

64

Sunderland Teaching

87

124

159

119

145

126

157

140

156

North West SHA

Ashton, Leigh and Wigan

54

72

76

112

138

131

134

192

209

Blackburn with Darwen

44

43

62

61

68

57

68

72

59

Blackpool

58

70

69

72

84

114

137

118

90

Bolton

88

94

84

86

163

116

104

167

142

Bury

65

68

77

68

101

126

100

125

136

Central and Eastern Cheshire

128

162

222

256

280

268

281

312

282

Central Lancashire

205

193

192

223

252

226

254

321

379

Cumbria

204

198

189

235

250

284

227

229

299

East Lancashire

164

161

187

232

238

201

226

219

232

Halton and St. Helens

107

118

123

81

123

130

135

173

143

Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale

52

81

78

102

116

97

113

119

130

Knowsley

46

40

45

57

58

78

68

111

74

Liverpool

136

145

168

149

194

185

191

304

221

Manchester

139

124

133

132

175

164

154

176

205

North Lancashire

170

197

174

155

241

206

244

281

263

Oldham

67

84

70

88

107

108

130

182

171

Salford

97

77

72

88

69

74

107

120

126

Sefton

108

101

128

128

151

159

174

263

228

Stockport

141

117

134

155

195

191

176

208

228

Tameside and Glossop

93

108

107

114

114

131

125

160

146

Trafford

113

112

121

128

130

150

134

176

138

Warrington

69

60

48

78

93

71

66

72

61

Western Cheshire

87

76

165

175

175

139

152

156

177

Wirral

131

140

124

154

151

144

131

157

166

Yorkshire and the Humber SHA

Barnsley

75

68

69

79

78

111

105

114

120

Bradford and Airedale

119

132

152

183

213

211

206

231

212

Calderdale

66

76

74

84

102

69

89

114

111

Doncaster

105

100

111

121

140

103

127

132

113

East Riding of Yorkshire

144

147

151

168

183

206

223

243

242

Hull

74

102

88

93

112

107

112

148

116

Kirklees

167

143

130

145

155

172

180

203

171

Leeds

277

271

302

318

391

319

384

430

364

North East Lincolnshire Care Trust Plus

59

54

62

74

110

119

101

81

89

North Lincolnshire

76

61

82

72

69

90

80

84

73

North Yorkshire and York

291

359

352

485

534

528

549

632

575

Rotherham

66

58

47

84

76

90

62

84

79

Sheffield

204

105

182

320

338

289

264

294

277

Wakefield District

136

145

129

152

153

206

186

206

186

East Midlands SHA

Bassetlaw

47

34

35

42

43

53

61

38

60

Derby City

82

65

86

107

116

119

124

138

144

Derbyshire County

241

260

305

344

381

418

387

426

430

Leicester City

65

63

84

103

98

111

89

103

95

Leicestershire County and Rutland

195

183

260

329

332

295

330

420

442

Lincolnshire

283

340

350

359

442

453

512

567

612

Northamptonshire

224

273

288

331

386

406

347

365

432

Nottingham City

98

87

88

88

75

61

44

112

98

Nottinghamshire County

218

214

248

216

238

210

206

320

295

West Midlands SHA

Birmingham East and North

175

145

169

174

257

277

258

293

233

Coventry Teaching

128

135

129

160

172

179

165

194

194

Dudley

93

112

128

121

148

155

202

198

187

Heart of Birmingham Teaching

87

102

87

90

113

124

128

149

112

Herefordshire

82

72

79

103

119

108

103

124

108

North Staffordshire

85

78

79

78

122

87

104

91

104

Sandwell

109

116

166

143

151

187

157

131

132

Shropshire County

158

166

158

187

207

219

214

208

218

Solihull

109

123

119

139

154

181

149

189

155

South Birmingham

138

139

158

167

236

221

222

223

220

South Staffordshire

198

206

274

297

297

346

376

438

393

Stoke on Trent

80

73

74

94

102

93

117

95

104

Telford and Wrekin

54

58

62

57

61

72

81

70

66

Walsall Teaching

90

96

97

HI

147

174

147

169

193

Warwickshire

194

262

265

327

325

333

287

340

308

Wolverhampton City

90

109

104

141

143

157

156

138

174

Worcestershire

215

255

267

338

329

328

408

452

449

East of England SHA

Bedfordshire

115

135

150

143

194

185

196

209

183

Cambridgeshire

222

183

250

293

330

367

360

374

415

East and North Hertfordshire

192

204

241

278

242

219

243

305

361

Great Yarmouth and Waveney

89

113

137

127

161

152

155

139

109

Luton

45

35

44

56

49

52

47

78

76

Mid Essex

124

151

164

151

193

148

198

141

203

Norfolk

330

351

396

476

506

661

529

610

531

North East Essex

105

120

123

202

222

195

182

172

207

Peterborough

46

60

73

81

81

99

79

85

75

South East Essex

186

162

162

210

232

203

228

212

177

South West Essex

166

135

130

163

205

191

210

171

183

Suffolk

320

280

331

329

372

386

450

437

394

West Essex

113

155

166

199

222

223

205

206

229

West Hertfordshire

203

188

260

249

213

223

165

154

310

London SHA

Barking and Dagenham

74

75

85

74

79

74

64

73

63

Barnet

92

130

150

129

141

153

131

155

134

Bexley

103

110

108

100

102

113

94

111

79

Brent Teaching

91

112

116

113

116

124

125

133

127

Bromley

80

86

106

101

124

149

131

109

87

Camden

80

68

71

50

78

98

75

58

83

City and Hackney Teaching

82

68

69

69

84

88

83

87

74

Croydon

124

105

112

123

151

199

172

182

224

Ealing

105

103

114

98

104

102

134

121

121

Enfield

102

94

107

112

124

130

126

124

112

Greenwich Teaching

82

84

89

108

85

75

77

87

81

Hammersmith and Fulham

36

41

42

53

70

34

72

63

75

Haringey Teaching

74

63

65

51

92

73

80

92

98

Harrow

83

79

91

86

80

71

117

98

128

Havering

109

112

123

136

155

167

157

190

141

Hillingdon

99

118

79

87

80

90

109

131

92

Hounslow

54

49

46

64

64

61

70

61

58

Islington

79

65

61

65

75

56

55

79

67

Kensington and Chelsea

57

59

55

73

68

69

66

75

59

Kingston

72

59

73

75

83

86

85

83

68

Lambeth

90

81

85

102

108

118

116

108

109

Lewisham

91

99

88

120

140

135

93

116

75

Newham

79

70

61

73

59

65

73

75

53

Redbridge

102

109

113

104

123

91

108

94

83

Richmond and Twickenham

71

68

70

64

70

105

78

79

66

Southwark

59

63

102

101

95

94

91

88

80

Sutton and Merton

140

157

147

189

199

170

182

192

148

Tower Hamlets

57

59

65

41

55

58

67

40

41

Waltham Forest

68

82

83

54

64

67

83

52

61

Wandsworth

106

114

109

110

138

156

125

128

112

Westminster

61

84

68

95

97

76

80

90

76

South East Coast SHA

Brighton and Hove City

127

90

130

143

122

109

100

116

98

East Sussex Downs and Weald

234

208

249

232

237

226

188

223

216

Eastern and Coastal Kent

305

310

333

296

353

369

398

415

402

Hastings and Rother

93

94

92

95

84

132

113

102

97

Medway

99

87

81

82

109

124

104

108

126

Surrey

523

487

528

574

579

540

533

523

522

West Kent

295

310

305

324

416

347

410

382

361

West Sussex

413

412

517

558

569

488

470

563

492

South Central SHA

Berkshire East

142

148

154

173

234

210

259

275

221

Berkshire West

195

220

259

240

216

216

272

294

221

Buckinghamshire

211

207

267

287

356

346

325

376

292

Hampshire

506

528

574

688

76!

852

736

815

733

Isle of Wight NHS

58

47

71

52

101

92

102

103

104

Milton Keynes

62

82

80

98

127

122

109

120

96

Oxfordshire

169

237

247

345

357

367

340

391

314

Portsmouth City Teaching

46

52

72

71

86

80

87

95

86

Southampton City

99

123

103

111

153

109

127

125

101

South West SHA

Bath and North East Somerset

93

82

88

98

111

144

130

137

124

Bournemouth and Poole

234

217

233

263

280

304

269

311

290

Bristol

141

152

164

141

171

211

213

208

179

Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

276

255

314

277

404

383

365

345

356

Devon

434

379

372

429

592

593

637

641

519

Dorset

338

315

315

406

464

510

477

529

423

Gloucestershire

236

253

284

312

363

305

331

383

372

North Somerset

106

113

125

108

141

151

199

182

125

Plymouth Teaching

106

115

94

36

147

109

159

192

143

Somerset

254

261

239

264

362

369

357

395

415

South Gloucestershire

100

84

109

109

109

156

168

145

138

Swindon

55

60

61

75

70

102

72

96

109

Torbay

81

67

71

85

88

78

106

113

121

Wiltshire

194

203

217

265

313

353

391

403

368

1 Malignant neoplasm of prostate is defined as code C61 in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10).

2 Based on NHS boundaries as of October 2006.

3 Each primary care organisation (PCO) is listed under the strategic health authority (SHA) to which it reports. The 152 primary care organisations include 148 primary care trusts (PCTs), and four care organisations (CO's). The PCOs are not all coterminous with SHAs—see Annex C footnotes at

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/gcography/health_areas.asp

Note:

The numbers of cases for the strategic health authorities (SHAs) have been grouped together at the top of the table because the total cases for each SHA are not always the same as the total cases for the primary care organisations (PCOs) reporting to the SHA. This is because PCOs boundaries are not all coterminous with SHAs boundaries as detailed in footnote 3 of Table 1.

Source:

Office for National Statistics

Leader of the House

Parliamentary Session

To ask the Leader of the House pursuant to the answer of 16 October 2008, Official Report, columns 1377-78W, on the parliamentary session, for how many hours the House (a) sat, (b) considered primary legislation and (c) considered delegated legislation in each (i) calendar year and (ii) session between 1984 and 1990. (229339)

The information requested is as follows. The figures refer to time spent on the Floor of the House. Information about time spent in Committee could be provided only at disproportionate cost:

Number of hours the House satNumber of hours considering primary legislation on the Floor of the HouseNumber of hours considering delegated legislation on the Floor of the House

Session

Hours

Minutes

Hours

Minutes

Hours

Minutes

1983-84

1,914

33

615

7

195

35

1984-85

1,566

17

502

52

156

30

1985-86

1,534

30

495

14

106

1

1986-87

930

26

298

1

60

18

1987-88

1,978

40

685

10

156

35

1988-89

1,581

41

523

6

88

1

1989-90

1,468

28

434

58

104

29

1990-91

1,373

53

395

54

76

5

Number of hours the House satNumber of hours considering primary legislation on the Floor of the HouseNumber of hours considering delegated legislation on the Floor of the House

Hours

Minutes

Hours

Minutes

Hours

Minutes

1984

1,574

24

514

57

142

23

1985

1,541

27

483

45

144

51

1986

1,504

3

501

35

107

46

1987

1,283

39

377

40

105

42

1988

1,576

13

592

12

102

20

1989

1,587

51

504

41

97

30

1990

1,531

2

467

24

94

40

Treasury

Building Societies: Finance

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what support the Government has provided to building societies during the recent economic difficulties. (228596)

The recapitalisation scheme announced on 8 October provides three measures aimed to help not just UK banks (including foreign subsidiaries) but also UK building societies. The extension of the Special Liquidity Scheme will provide short-term liquidity. The recapitalisation through shares (both ordinary and preference) as well as Permanent Interest Bearing Shares (PIBS), will strengthen institutions’ resources, allowing them to restructure their finances while maintaining their support for the real economy. The credit guarantee scheme will ensure that the banking system has the necessary funds in the medium term. This scheme, which is now being replicated worldwide, is available for all UK building societies.

Departmental Older Workers

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many people aged over (a) 55 and (b) 60 years were recruited by his Department in 2007-08; and what percentage in each case this was of the number of new recruits. (228742)

Nine new recruits were aged over 55 of which four were aged over 60. This accounts for 2.4 per cent. and 1.0 per cent. of new recruits respectively.

Excise Duties: Fuels

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the likely effect of any decision to lower fuel duties in Northern Ireland on tax revenues. (229472)

Fuel duty is a national tax, whose aim is to fund public services across the United Kingdom while supporting the Government’s UK-wide environmental policies. A single fuel duty rate therefore applies for the entire United Kingdom.

Income Tax: Tax Rates and Bands

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the annual revenue which would be forgone by raising the higher rate of income tax threshold to (a) £45,000 and (b) £50,000. (229739)

The threshold above which the higher rate of income tax applies depends on the level of the personal allowance and the basic rate limit, either of which could be varied to give the thresholds requested for a taxpayer aged under 65.

Table 1 of the Generic Tax Tables 2008-09: “Additional full-year yield/cost from increasing the Basic Rate Limit (BRL) and higher rates of tax in 2008-09” provides information on the cost of a range of increases to the BRL, and is available in the Library of the House. The table excludes any estimates of behavioural response.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many people were paying the higher rate of income tax in (a) 1997 and (b) on the latest date for which figures are available. (229763)

Information on the number of higher rate taxpayers for the period 1990-91 to 2008-09 can be found in Table 2.1 “Number of individual income taxpayers” on the HM Revenue and Customs website at:

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/stats/income_tax/menu.htm

Interest Rates

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what steps he is taking in partnership with the Bank of England to reduce the spread between official interest rates and the three-month London inter-bank offered rate; and if he will make a statement. (228789)

The Chancellor announced on 8 October a comprehensive package to address sector wide concerns regarding liquidity and solvency and to restore confidence.

Mortgages

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the ratio is between the cost of premises mortgaged by Northern Rock and the average earnings of their mortgagees (a) nationally, (b) in the North East and (c) in each county in the North East. (228678)

I refer the hon. Gentleman to the answer given to the hon. Member for Carmarthen, East and Dinefwr (Adam Price) on 21 July 2008, Official Report, column 728W.

Taxation: Shipping

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the reasons were for the decision by HM Revenue and Customs to review the guidance on vessels that do not qualify under the seafarers’ earnings deduction income tax rules. (226230)

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what recent representations he has received on seafarers’ earnings deduction; and if he will make a statement; (226147)

(2) whether he plans to meet the Secretary of State for Transport to discuss the effects of the reclassification of seafarers’ earnings deduction on the recruitment and retention of British seafarers.

The background to the decision by HM Revenue and Customs to revise its guidance on seafarer’s earnings deduction (SED) is a decision by the Special Commissioners, an independent appellate body, in the case of Torr and Others v. CIR (SpC679). The great majority of seafarers who claim SED will not be affected by this decision.

I am aware of the concerns raised by the Special Commissioners’ decision in this case, which centred on whether the vessel on which the appellants performed their duties was a ship or an ‘offshore installation’ within the meaning of the legislation. The Special Commissioners decided it had been operating as an offshore installation, and refused the appellants’ claims to SED.

Broadly speaking, an offshore installation is a vessel that is engaged in exploiting mineral resources and is not mobile while doing so. HMRC has written to tax practitioners about this decision and will discuss the implementation with interested stakeholders before the revised guidance is issued.

Treasury Ministers regularly receive representation on tax issues from a variety of sources and hold discussions and meetings with ministerial colleagues on a wide range of issues.

Welfare Tax Credits: Correspondence

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when the Parliamentary Business Unit of the Tax Credit Office plans to respond to the letter from the hon. Member for Edinburgh, West’s letter of 14 July 2008 on his constituents Mr. and Mrs. Mitchell. (228689)

The Tax Credit Office sent a reply to the hon. Member about his constituents on 10 September 2008 and are sending the hon. Member a copy of their letter.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when the Parliamentary Business Unit of the Tax Credit Office plans to respond to the hon. Member for Edinburgh, West’s correspondence of 5 August 2008 on his constituent Susan Marshall. (228827)

The Tax Credit Office replied to the hon. Member about his constituent on 10 October 2008 and apologises for the delay in doing so.

Innovation, Universities and Skills

Arts: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills whether his Department has commissioned research on the extent to which further education institutions are equipping students with the skills needed to help them make a contribution to the creative economy. (227187)

The Department has not itself commissioned any research into this issue. In November 2006 DCMS published on their website the findings of an Education and Skills Working Group review of the contribution education and skills make to the creative economy agenda. This was part of their wider creative economy programme, and included the mapping of existing provision.

In addition, a key part of the work of the Sector Skills Councils (SSCs) is to set out the current and future skill needs of employers in their sectors. Sector skills agreements identify the skills priorities and actions that need to be taken by stakeholders across the education and skills system. Government have provided support for the SSCs in carrying out this work. In relation to the creative economy, there are three lead SSCs that have each published sector agreements. These are Creative and Cultural Skills (advertising, crafts, music, performing, heritage, design and arts sectors), Skillset (broadcasting, photo imaging, audio visual and publishing sectors) and Skillfast (fashion and textiles).

Departmental Official Visits

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills how much was spent on overnight accommodation by his Department’s civil servants in the last 12 months. (228773)

The information is not available in the form requested and can be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Dorneywood

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills pursuant to the answer to the right hon. Member for Horsham of 19 June 2008, Official Report, column 1187W, on Dorneywood: official hospitality, what use his Department has made of Dorneywood for official engagements in the last 12 months. (222108)

My right hon. Friend, the Chancellor of the Exchequer has the use of Dorneywood as an official residence. The Chancellor and the Trustees have made Dorneywood available to other Ministers to use for official engagements.

Since the creation of the Department in July 2007, DIUS has not made use of Dorneywood for official engagements.

Education Maintenance Allowance: Further Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what recent discussions he has had with the Learning and Skills Council on delays in education maintenance allowance payments for students in further education colleges. (229016)

Ministers from the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) and the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS) hold regular meetings with the Learning and Skills Council (LSC), which includes discussion of learner support and Education Maintenance Allowances (EMAs). The latest meeting took place with the LSC on 21 October 2008.

The LSC is responsible for the delivery of EMA and is providing regular updates on performance. The position as it relates to delivery of EMA is set out in my right hon. Friend, the Minister for Schools and Learners' letter of 8 October to the chair of the Children, Schools and Families Select Committee.

Energy Technologies Institute

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills how projects funded by the Energy Technologies Institute (ETI) are selected; what independent assessment is undertaken of applications for funding; and what evaluation is undertaken of the value for money of ETI funding. (228484)

The Energy Technologies Institute (ETI) commissions technology projects that have the capability, when subsequently deployed, to reduce CO2 emissions and provide reliable, affordable energy. The ETI engages in a wide consultation process to identify the key project areas where ETI funding would make a substantial impact. These project areas are then published on the ETI website, and potential project consortia are invited to respond. Detailed technical proposals are assessed by selection panels of specialists, independent of the proposal. The value for money of a project is decided on the basis of a number of factors including the CO2 impact and the provision of affordable and reliable energy, in addition to the benefit offered by the project to the wider industry.

Foundation Degrees

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills which organisation regulates the quality of foundation degrees. (227428)

Foundation degrees are validated and quality assured by universities and they undergo the same rigorous quality assurance procedures as other higher education qualifications. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) safeguards the standards of higher education qualifications by working with higher education institutions to define academic standards and quality.

Further Education: Learning Disability

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what criteria are used to determine whether further education college courses for people with learning difficulties are eligible for public funding; and what contingency arrangements are in place to help people on these courses that have recently lost funding. (229005)

Learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are a priority group for the Learning and Skills Council.

Learning plans for learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are individualised to support the learners’ need, maximise their chances of progression and to ensure positive outcomes from their programmes of study. This includes the promotion of employability and independent living skills where appropriate.

Where possible the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) expects programmes for learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities to include approved qualifications and ensure all learning is accredited.

In cases where low quality provision may have to be replaced, contingency arrangements will be handled by the local LSC office who negotiate alternative provision with local partners to minimise any disruption to the learner.

Higher Education: Admissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills what Government grants are (a) available to and (b) planned to be introduced for universities for improving and widening social access to higher education. (227425)

The Government make available some £350 million each year through the widening participation premium in the institutional funding distributed by the Higher Education Funding Council. In addition, by paying the up front costs of tuition fees and providing extra support for students from families on modest incomes, the Government have committed well over £1 billion a year to enable universities to improve and widen social access to higher education. But whatever the level of funding provided by the Government, institutions that draw from a narrow social base will ultimately lose out if they deny themselves access to talented students from all backgrounds. That is the fundamental case for both widening participation and fair access.

Physics: Higher Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills (1) how much the Government have spent on university physics departments since 1997; (227850)

(2) how much research funding the Government have provided to university physics departments in each financial year since 1998.

Figures for quality related research funding for physics paid by the Higher Education Funding Council for England to HEFCE are shown in the following table:

HEFCE researching funding

£ million

1998-99

34.9

1999-2000

37.7

2000-01

38.3

2001-02

38.3

2002-03

39.0

2003-04

45.0

2004-05

47.6

2005-06

55.9

2006-07

59.5

2007-08

63.1

2008-09

63.5

Figures for physics teaching cannot be provided. HEFCE pays teaching grant as a block to institutions. It does not make separate payments to departments for teaching.

Research Council expenditure in university physics departments is as follows

£ million

2001-02

304.26

2002-03

320.61

2003-04

345.96

2004-05

402.61

2005-06

425.10

2006-07

443.12

Comparable data prior to 2001 are not available.

Further information on Research Councils funding for physics is available at

http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/cmsweb/downloads/rcuk/reviews/physics/prrcfda.pdf

Prime Minister

10 Downing Street: Official Hospitality

To ask the Prime Minister (1) what events have been held at 10 Downing Street since 1 August 2008; (228945)

(2) if he will place in the Library a copy of invitations sent out for the last 10 events held at 10 Downing Street;

(3) by what process the themes for events held at 10 Downing Street are chosen;

(4) whether any hon. or right hon. Members other than Cabinet Ministers have been invited to host or co-host events in 10 Downing Street in the last year;

(5) what guidance has been issued on the apportionment of costs arising from events held at 10 Downing Street;

(6) on how many occasions events were held at 10 Downing Street at a cost to the public purse in 2007-08; and what the total cost was of such events;

(7) if he will place in the Library a copy of the attendance list for each of the last 10 events held at 10 Downing Street;

(8) from which budget the cost of drinks provided at events held at 10 Downing Street is met.

Information on official and charity receptions held at 10 Downing Street is published by means of an annual list as soon as it is ready at the end of the financial year.

These events consist of official dinners and events for foreign leaders and other dignitaries, receptions for business leaders, community and charity representatives and sportsmen and women. In the past few years, an increased programme of events at Downing street has been introduced in order to give access to as many people as possible, including children and regular receptions for a wide cross-section of the community.

Information for 2007-08 was published on 22 July 2008, Official Report, column 108-110WS.

Cabinet: Meetings

To ask the Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 17 September 2008, Official Report, column 2229W, on the Cabinet: meetings, if he will notify the hon. Members for North Cornwall, Worthing West, South West Devon and Perth and North Perthshire in advance of the publication date of the costs associated with holding the Cabinet meeting in Birmingham. (229426)

Departmental Alcoholic Drinks

To ask the Prime Minister how much champagne was ordered by the Prime Minister’s Office for consumption at events at (a) 10 Downing Street and (b) Chequers in each of the last six months. (226474)

Departmental Official Visits

To ask the Prime Minister how much was spent on overnight accommodation by civil servants in his Office in the last 12 months. (228779)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to him by the Secretary, Cabinet Office, my hon. Friend (Kevin Brennan) on 21 October 2008, Official Report, column 294W.

Departmental Pay

To ask the Prime Minister how many non-pensionable bonuses were awarded to members of staff in his Office in the last 12 months; and at what total cost. (226428)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Secretary for the Cabinet Office (Mr. Watson) on 22 October 2008, Official Report, column 453W.

Departmental Special Advisers

To ask the Prime Minister if he will list (a) his special envoys and (b) their (i) professions, (ii) responsibilities as envoys and (iii) dates of starting and ending their roles. (224900)

To ask the Prime Minister to whom or which Department the Prime Minister’s Special Representative on Energy Issues reports; what his terms of reference are; and from which Department he would draw expenses, should any be incurred. (226844)

To ask the Prime Minister (1) whether he plans to appoint a special representative for Cyprus; and if he will make a statement; (229046)

(2) whether he plans to appoint an envoy for forestry; and if he will make a statement.

I refer the hon. Member to the ministerial appointments press notice issued by my Office. A copy has been placed in the Library of the House and is also available on the No. 10 website at:

http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/press-notices

In addition, my right hon. Friend the Member for Cynon Valley (Ann Clwyd), who has served since 2003 as the Prime Minister’s Special Envoy for Human Rights in Iraq, continues to perform her very important role.

They are entitled to claim reasonable travel and subsistence expenses incurred as part of their work. These expenses are paid in accordance with existing departmental guidelines on allowances and subsistence.

Departmental Staff

To ask the Prime Minister (1) what the roles of (a) Wilf Stevenson and (b) Nicola Burdett are in his Office; and if he will make a statement on their remuneration; (229051)

(2) what the role is of Damian McBride in his Office; and if he will make a statement about his remuneration.

Special advisers are appointed under terms and conditions set out in the Model Contract for Special Advisers.

Economic Situation

To ask the Prime Minister what discussions he had with the Leader of the Opposition before the announcement of the bank rescue package; and when those discussions were held. (227658)

Employment: Midwives

To ask the Prime Minister if he will publish a response to the e-petition submitted via his website calling for a jobs guarantee for newly-qualified midwives. (226552)

A response has been published on the No 10 website:

http://www.Number10.gov.uk/Page17219

A copy of this webpage has been placed in the Library of the House.

Energy: Departmental Responsibilities

To ask the Prime Minister if he will place responsibility for the energy-saving activities of the market transformation programme with the Department for Energy and Climate Change; and if he will make a statement. (229584)

I refer the hon. Member to the written statement I made on 13 October 2008, Official Report, column 32WS, and the accompanying Cabinet Office paper that was placed in the Library. Defra continues to lead on sustainable consumption and production.

EU Trade

To ask the Prime Minister what consideration he gave to the effect on the Doha world trade talks of the recall of the British Commissioner holding the post of EU Trade Commissioner. (229748)

The recent G8 communiqué set out our joint desire to restart the trade talks as quickly as possible. The UK will continue to play a central role within the EU and work with other key players to ensure a successful completion of the Doha round. My right hon. and noble Friend Baroness Ashton of Upholland's appointment as Trade Commissioner was approved by the European Parliament on 22 October 2008 by an overwhelming majority of 538 in favour to 40 against.

Israel

To ask the Prime Minister what consideration he gave to visiting Sderot during his recent visit to Israel; and if he will make a statement. (225605)

I visited Israel at the invitation of the Knesset Speaker and Prime Minister Olmert. During my talks, I made clear that the UK Government fully supports the Egyptian brokered ceasefire that has succeeded in greatly reducing the number of rocket attacks targeting Sderot. The Government remain committed to helping all sides in achieving a settlement which provides security for Israel and justice for the Palestinians. My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary (David Miliband) met the Mayor of Sderot, Eli Moyall, in March to hear his account of the situation.

Lord Mandelson

To ask the Prime Minister at what time and on what date Lord Mandelson's appointment as Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform formally commenced. (228540)

I refer my right hon. Friend to the Ministerial Appointments press notices released by my Office. Copies have been placed in the Library of the House and are also available on the No 10 website:

http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/press-notices.

Ministers: Transport

To ask the Prime Minister if he will encourage Ministers with business in the House to walk between their departmental buildings in Whitehall and Victoria Street and the Palace of Westminster. (228231)

This is a matter for individual Ministers who continue to travel making the most efficient and cost-effective arrangements.

Regional Economic Council of Ministers

To ask the Prime Minister (1) how meetings of the Regional Economic Council of Ministers will be accountable to (a) Parliament and (b) the public; if he will place copies of the minutes of the meetings on a Government website and in the Library; and whether the Council will be a public authority for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act 2000; (226531)

(2) whether the (a) minutes of meetings of and (b) papers discussed at the National Economic Council will be a public authority for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act 2006.

The Regional Economic Council will support my right hon. Friends the Chancellor of the Exchequer (Mr. Darling) and the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Lord Mandelson) to carry out their departmental responsibilities. Any freedom of information (FOI) issues will be dealt with by HM Treasury and BERR, which are public authorities within the FOI Act. The Cabinet Office will deal with any FOI requests relating to the National Economic Council.

Any requests for information made under the Freedom of Information Act are considered on a case by case basis.

Justice

Complementary Medicine: Channel Islands

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice when officials in his Department next intend to meet representatives of the Health Food Manufacturers Association to discuss the import of food supplements and herbal remedies from the Channel Islands; and if he will make a statement on the progress made to date in securing the compliance of the Crown Dependencies with European legislation on food supplements and medicines. (228579)

Officials in the Ministry of Justice will next meet representatives from the Health Food Manufacturers Association on 11 November to discuss the import of food supplements and herbal remedies from the Channel Islands and the progress the Crown Dependencies are making with compliance with the Food Supplements Directive.

Departmental Databases

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what steps are being taken to meet the learning and development needs of (a) youth offender team managers, (b) prison governors and (c) probation officers in their role as data controllers. (228866)

All activities undertaken by the Wiring Up Youth Justice Programme are in addition to the work these organisations (prison service, probation service and local authorities) already have under way in this area.

The key supplementary activities include:

Analysis of learning requirements and the extent to which these learning needs are currently being met by their local authority.

Input from the Information Commissioner’s office at a series of regional events.

Emphasis on the importance of registering as data controllers—this registration gives access to a wide range of support and training materials.

Provision of a range of communications activity on this subject.

Likewise, there is a code of connection to all new YJS information sharing services which also provides material and guidance in terms of information management.

E-Asset IT System

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what the projected cost is of implementing fully the E-Asset IT system; (228854)

(2) what the cost to date has been of implementing the E-Asset IT system;

(3) which (a) secure children's homes, secure training centres and youth offender institutions and (b) other bodies within his responsibility are currently using fully the E-Asset IT system;

(4) which secure children's homes, secure training centres and youth offender institutions are not using fully the E-Asset IT system;

(5) when the E-Asset Sentence Management System will be fully implemented across the secure children's home, secure training centre and youth offender institution estates;

The E-Asset project started in July 2006. The projected cost of fully implementing the E-Asset system is £8.9 million. This cost can be broken down into £4.8 million for technology development and hosting; and £4.1 million expenditure on business change activities associated with roll-out and implementation across the juvenile secure estate—e.g. training.

The cost to date (since July 2006) of implementing the E-Asset system is £7.49 million. This can be broken down into £4.1 million for technology development and hosting and £3.39 million for implementation (roll-out and training).

All establishments in the secure estate have successfully installed encryption devices in preparation for national roll-out. The rollout of the E-Asset system is currently running to original schedule and budget and on track for completion by April 2009. The intention during 2009-10 is to consolidate system usage through a programme of post implementation review, to ensure it is being used to its maximum potential. All establishments within the juvenile secure estate for England and Wales, whether run by HMPS, local authorities or the private sector are committed to implementing the E-Asset system.

The following establishments are fully implemented as at 20 October 2008:

Private Establishments

Ashfield

HM Prison Service Establishments

HMPS YOI Castington

HMPS YOI Downview

HMPS YOI Eastwood Park

HMPS YOI Feltham

HMPS YOI Foston Hall

HMPS YOI Hindley

HMPS YOI Huntercombe

HMPS YOI Lancaster Farms

HMPS YOI New Hall

HMPS YOI Thorn Cross

HMPS YOI Warren Hill

HMPS YOI Wetherby

Secure Training Centre Establishments

Hassockfield

Medway

Rainsbrook

Local Authority Secure Children's Homes

Aldine House

Aycliffe

Barton Moss

Kyloe House

Sutton Place

These 21 sites represent 65 per cent. of the capacity of the secure estate (in terms of beds). In addition, the Youth Justice Board for England and Wales have full access to the E-Asset system. In future, it is envisaged that aspects of the system may be viewable by Youth Offending Teams to ensure joint Sentence Planning and improved provision for effective community resettlement.

The following custodial establishments are scheduled to implement the E-Asset system by April 2009.

Private Establishments

Parc YOI

HM Prison Service Establishments

HMPS YOI Brinsford

HMPS YOI Stoke Heath

HMPS YOI Werrington

Secure Training Centre Establishments

Oakhill

Local Authority Secure Children's Homes

Atkinson Unit

Clayfields House

East Moor

Hillside

Lincolnshire

Orchard Lodge

Red Bank

Swannick Lodge

Vinney Green

The E-Asset Sentence Management system will be fully rolled out across the juvenile secure estate by April 2009.

Electoral Register: Internet

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the cost has been of developing the co-ordinated online record of electors to date. (228840)

The costs of developing the co-ordinated online record of electors (CORE) to date, excluding staff costs, is £2,781,840 made up as follows:

£1,726,631 to enable local authorities’ electoral management systems to output data in an agreed Election Mark Up Language (EML) format

£23,111.38 for the feasibility study on the implementation of national access arrangements

£5,760 for a business impact assessment on data security

£6,338 for 13 workshops involving over 280 electoral administrators in England and Wales and Scottish Assessors

£1.02 million grant in aid for local authorities to support the implementation of the Electoral Registration Data Standards, introduced following a direction from Bridget Prentice made under section 52(1) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (c2) (as amended). The direction requires all Electoral Registration Officers in Great Britain to ensure that any electoral registration data held on electronic systems is formatted in compliance with the standards.

It is not possible to quantify the total cost of staff employed on the CORE project since the inception of CORE in 2003 because this information is not available. In January 2008, the CORE project began work on the development and definition of the functionality and services that the CORE Information System will provide, and in April 2008 passed through an OGC Gateway 1 review. Following the recommendation of this review the project team has been expanded to support this work. The total cost of the project team from January 2008 has been £187,259.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what plans there are to consult on developing the next phases of the co-ordinated online record of electors. (228841)

Throughout 2008 we have been holding meetings and workshops with potential users of the system to gather user requirements, identify issues and test assumptions around how the CORE Service and its IT and business systems will operate. This will inform development of a “high level statement of requirements” for the CORE system. It is expected that the high level statement of user requirements will be complete by March 2009. The Government would consult on the detail of any proposed CORE Scheme Order that followed this.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether a full cost-benefit analysis of introducing a co-ordinated electoral registration service has been undertaken by the Department. (228842)

There are currently no plans to introduce a co-ordinated electoral registration service.

However, the Co-ordinated Online Record of Electors (CORE) project aims to provide a single authoritative source of electoral registration data through assembling copies of local electoral registers into a single national database.

An initial cost-benefit analysis has been undertaken as part of the business case for the project. The cost-benefit analysis will develop as the business case develops, and will inform decisions on the final scope of the CORE scheme and on the development of the project. A final business case, including a final cost-benefit analysis, cannot be settled until the CORE scheme is specified in detail and a procurement strategy is agreed. The CORE project team is currently gathering user requirements to inform development of a “high level statement of requirements”, which will inform decisions on scope, procurement and define the detailed specification, and the business case and cost-benefit analysis will be updated in the light of that work.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the status is of the development of the coordinated online record of electors project. (228868)

The CORE project is currently moving forward with two parallel strands of work: implementation of electoral registration data standards and the gathering of user requirements for the CORE system and CORE service to service the detailed specification of the system.

In April 2008, my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Bridget Prentice) issued direction under section 52(1) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (c.2)(as amended) with which Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) in Great Britain are required to comply by 1 December 2009. The direction requires that any electoral registration data held on electronic systems are formatted in compliance with the standards.

Throughout 2008 officials have been holding meetings and workshops with potential users of the system to gather user requirements, identify issues and test assumptions around how the CORE Service and its IT and business systems will operate. This will inform development of a ‘high level statement of requirements’. It is expected that this high level statement of user requirements will be complete by March 2009. That statement will inform decision about the design, scope and build of the CORE system.

We continue to engage with the Electoral Commission as the preferred choice to fulfil the role of the CORE Keeper.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether a final decision on the scope and specification of the Co-ordinated Online Register of Electors project has been made. (228869)

A final decision has not yet been made on the scope and specification of the CORE service. The CORE project team is currently gathering user requirements to inform development of a “high level statement of requirements”: this in turn will inform decisions on scope and the detailed specification. Throughout 2008 we have been holding meetings and workshops with potential users of the system to gather user requirements, identify issues and test assumptions around how the CORE Service and its IT and business systems will operate. It is expected that the high level statement of user requirements will be complete by March 2009.

Electronic Voting

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether there are any plans to introduce e-voting mechanisms before the local and European elections in 2009. (228861)

No. The Government do not plan to introduce e-voting for the 2009 European or local elections.

The way forward more generally on e-voting will be informed by the valuable experience gained from earlier pilots, analysis of the responses to the election day consultation, and further development work including the possible further testing of e-voting solutions in non-statutory elections.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether there are any plans for further e-voting pilots in the next 12 months. (228862)

The Government have no plans for further e-voting pilots in statutory elections at this stage.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the budget is for work on remote electronic voting over the next two years. (228864)

Detailed budgets for future years have not yet been specifically allocated. Further work on remote electronic voting will be funded as necessary from existing budgets agreed for Electoral Modernisation, subject to ministerial and HM Treasury approval. The Government are currently taking stock of the previous work on remote e-voting, including the experience gained in earlier pilots, and the responses to the consultation on election day, to inform the way forward.

Energy Savings Trust

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how much funding his Department provided for the Energy Savings Trust in 2007-08; and how much it is providing for 2008-09. (225997)

[holding answer 13 October 2008]: I have been asked to reply.

DEFRA provided £29 million for the Energy Savings Trust in the period 2007-08 and will provide £36.2 million for the 2008-09 period.

HM Courts Service: Databases

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what percentage of HM Courts Service staff are now linked to the LIBRA system; (228848)

(2) when LIBRA will become operational across the whole magistrates court network.

As at 17 October 2008, 77 per cent. of magistrates courts are linked to the Libra application. This equates to approximately 75 per cent. of our anticipated total user numbers. Libra will be deployed and operational in all magistrates courts in England and Wales by 9 December 2008.

Judiciary: Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what assessment he has made of the implications of the deficit in the Judicial Contributory Pension Fund. (229198)

The Judicial Pension Scheme is unfunded, so when benefits fall due for payment they are met from Government revenues. There is no actual pension fund or deficit. However, in any particular year, income from contributions from administering bodies and scheme members is used to offset the costs of paying benefits to pensioners.

Matrimonial Proceedings: Religion

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what guidance is issued on the validity of (a) fatwas and (b) other rulings issued by religious authorities in the determination of matrimonial disputes. (228591)

We do not issue any guidance on the validity of fatwas or other rulings by a religious authority because there is no need for such guidance. Shari'a law has no jurisdiction in England and Wales and there is no intention to change this position. Similarly, we do not accommodate any other religious legal system in this country's laws. Any order in a family case is made or approved by a family judge applying English family law.

If, in a family dispute dealing with money or children, the parties to a judgment in a Shari'a council wish to have this recognised by English authorities, they are at liberty to draft a consent order embodying the terms of the agreement and submit it to an English court. This allows English judges to scrutinise it to ensure that it complies with English legal tenets.

The use of religious courts to deal with personal disputes is well established. Any member of a religious community has the option to use religious courts and to agree to abide by their decisions but these decisions are subject to national law and cannot be enforced through the national courts save in certain limited circumstances when the religious court acts as arbitrator within the meaning of the Arbitration Act 1996. Arbitration does not apply to family law and the only decisions which can be enforced are those relating to civil disputes.

Religious courts are always subservient to the established family courts of England and Wales.

Medicine: Guernsey

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether any bills originating in Guernsey making provisions for the law relating to medicine have received Royal Assent in the last two years; and if he will make a statement. (228575)

In the past two years no medicines legislation from Guernsey has been submitted for Royal Assent.

National Probation Service for England and Wales: IT

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what assessment he has made of the effect of not completing the implementation earlier in 2008 of C-NOMIS to the Probation Service in terms of end to end management of offenders. (228845)

The revised NOMIS Programme, which replaces C-NOMIS, will deliver the same objectives through a strategy that delivers a component based solution rather than a single solution.

Within the National Probation Service (NPS) steps have been taken to replace at risk case management systems in three areas. All probation areas in the longer term will receive a centralised version of a redeveloped case management system known as Delius. This development will enhance the exchange of information between probation areas and provide potential for data sharing with the Prison Service (HMPS).

The two existing Offender Risk Assessment Systems (OASys), used by HMPS and NPS, will be replaced by an improved, centralised system which will enhance sharing of information and support end to end offender management.

Offenders: Deportation

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice for which categories of offences those foreign national prisoners who have been released in the UK without being deported in the last five years were originally convicted. (228633)

The information requested is not available and can be obtained only by cross-referencing records held by the Ministry of Justice and UK Border Agency at disproportionate cost.

Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what steps his Department has taken to ensure that (a) existing and (b) potential users of the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal have full and accurate information about the changes being made to the system; and what consultation his Department has undertaken with voluntary sector organisations on the changes being made to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal. (229026)

SENDIST judiciary have been concerned to make sure that full and accurate information was provided to users as soon as it was confirmed and available and to engage users in the development of new processes. Two newsletters have been issued to users; the first in July and the second in October. Both contained detailed information on changes to processes and the latter addressed specific issues of concern raised by users. There has also been a service user group made up of representatives from a range of voluntary groups and local education authorities working with the judiciary to ensure the rules, practice directions and case management system are fit for purpose. SENDIST judiciary and members of the service user group will be providing free training on the rules, practice directions and case management system for parent representatives from November.

Information on the draft practice directions was available on the SENDIST website in July and the draft practice directions themselves were also sent out to a wide range of service user groups in early October.

There has been a two-part consultation process on the changes for those jurisdictions, including SENDIST that will move into the new tribunals structure. “Transforming Tribunals” discussed the proposals for the new tribunals structure and ran from 28 November 2007 to 22 February 2008. The “Health, Education and Social Care Chamber Rules” were consulted upon from 29 May until 11 July 2008.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what assessment he has made of the likely effects of the new arrangements for the Special Education Needs and Disability Panel on access to the tribunal for parents without legal representation. (229027)

The new case management system will ensure that evidence is limited to relevant issues, that witnesses at hearings are restricted to those strictly necessary to the case and are fairly balanced between parties and that adjournments largely avoided. This new process will enable the tribunal to provide more help to unrepresented parents to ensure they provide, and also obtain from the local education authority, the right information at the appropriate stages of the process. Representatives from voluntary sector groups providing advice and assistance to parents have had input into the design of the processes. Many parents successfully appeal without the need for legal representation at hearings and it is not anticipated there will be any increase in the level of need for such legal representation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what assessment he has made of the potential cost implications of the new system for special educational needs and disability tribunals for (a) parents, (b) local authorities and (c) voluntary and advocacy organisations. (229028)

Case management may result in some additional upfront cost in some individual cases: whether in the form of paperwork to provide better information or a preliminary hearing, in complex cases, to identify the issues and tell the parties what they need to provide. But the case management system is designed, in the interests of the child, to ensure speedier resolution, shorter final hearings and the avoidance of adjournments by identifying the issues at an early stage and getting the right information to the tribunal at the right time. Overall, it is expected that this will lead to a reduction in time spent and cost for users.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice whether the new case management system for the Special Educational Needs and Disability Panel has been piloted. (229029)

A live case was registered on 3 October with the case management hearing scheduled for mid-December and the final hearing set for a date in February. With the consent of the parties it is being used as a pilot for the new case management system. Where possible other cases will be used as pilots before the system is wholly implemented. Operation of the new system will be kept under review.

Voting Methods

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice when his Department plans to publish the response to the consultation on weekend voting. (228860)

The “Election Day: Weekend Voting” consultation ended on 26 September. Analysis of the responses received is now under way. We aim to publish the consultation response as soon as practicable.

Werrington Young Offender Institution

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice with reference to the Independent Monitoring Board Annual Report on HM Young Offender Institution Werrington, what assessment he has made of the availability of places for young offenders from the Potteries area; and if he will make a statement. (228580)

The Youth Justice Board considers there to be adequate local provision for young people from the Stoke-on-Trent area, who are usually placed in the closest suitable establishments—the young offender institutions at Stoke Heath, Brinsford and Werrington. On occasion, young people from the area may be placed further away, where there are good reasons for doing so, such as the need to access the regime in a secure training centre or secure children’s home.

During the period covered by the Independent Monitoring Board’s report (1 June 2006 to 31 May 2007), population pressures on the under-18 estate made it necessary to move some young people from the south of England to the Midlands. For that reason Werrington received a number of young people from the south of England. Since the opening of Cookham Wood as a young offender institution earlier this year, such placements have not been necessary and, other than in exceptional circumstances, the Youth Justice Board does not envisage a need for them in the foreseeable future.

Young Offender Institutions: Social Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many young offender institutions have specialist social workers in permanent posts working in them. (228725)

12 young people’s establishments in the young people’s estate and dedicated prison service units for young women have social workers in post.

Young Offenders

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many young people attended more than (a) one, (b) two and (c) three young offender institutions in each of the last 10 years. (228729)

The National Offender Management Service does not routinely keep figures for the number of young people attending more than (a) one, (b) two and (c) three young offender institutions.

Youth Action Plan

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what discussions he has had with Ministers from the Department for Children, Schools and Families on the drafting of the Youth Action Plan. (229444)

The Youth Crime Action Plan was conceived and developed jointly by the Ministry of Justice, the Department for Children, Schools and Families and the Home Office. Ministers from all three Departments had regular contact throughout the drafting of the plan and we continue to work together to oversee its implementation.

Youth Justice Management Information System

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice when he will publish the results of the pilot of the Youth Justice Management Information System. (228846)

The pilot of the Youth Justice Management Information System has successfully concluded. From an early stage the project has been sharing its findings with its stakeholders, including youth offending teams, secure establishments and local criminal justice boards. A final report of the pilot has been distributed to the Youth Justice Management Information System project board. The objectives of the pilot were met and it is seen to be successful and is currently deploying nationally.

The application has over 120 active users. It has already taken over responsibility for the production of daily management reports on the occupancy levels of the secure estate and has delivered significant efficiency benefits.

The project is now in national rollout across .the youth justice system. The system will be used by practitioners within the Youth Justice Board, all youth offending teams across England and Wales, and all juvenile secure establishments. The national roll-out is on schedule to conclude in March 2009.

There are no plans to formally publish a report on the pilots.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what the estimated cost is of implementing the Connectivity system across the youth justice network; (228850)

(2) what the cost to date has been of developing the Connectivity network;

(3) when the Connectivity application software and encryption devices will be installed by all youth offender teams;

(4) which (a) youth offender teams and (b) non-HM Prison Service secure establishments are (i) using fully and (ii) not using fully Connectivity information sharing in their everyday operation.

The Connectivity system has taken two years from design through to implementation at a cost of approximately £6 million.

The Connectivity project started in July 2006. The cost to date of developing, maintaining and upgrading the connectivity network as at September 2008 is £5.28 million.

The Connectivity encryption devices are already rolled out across all 157 youth offending teams allowing secure sharing of information. The application software is fully developed and is scheduled to be completely rolled out by April of 2009.

The programme is taking a two-stage approach to secure information sharing between YOTs and secure establishments. The first stage which utilises secure email is now fully complete, involving all 157 YOTs and 35 secure establishments. The second stage, which involves system to system connectivity, has been successfully implemented to YOTs and secure establishment in the Yorkshire and Humber and north-east regions (containing nine YOTs and two secure establishments).

Full implementation of the Connectivity solution (stage two) is scheduled for April 2009.

International Development

Burma: Education

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how much UK aid funding in response to the cyclone in Burma has been allocated to education; and if he will make a statement. (227400)

Although none of the Department for International Development's (DFID) cyclone relief assistance has been specifically allocated to education, the sector has benefited from our funding allocated to multi-sectoral programmes managed by UN agencies and non-governmental organisations, and from our support to the logistical effort needed to deliver aid supplies.

Early in the cyclone relief effort it became clear that education programmes, such as those being undertaken by UNICEF and Save the Children, were relatively well funded by other donors. DFID therefore chose to focus support on other critical priorities which were less well funded such as food, shelter, health care, clean water and the restoration of people's livelihoods.

Since around 75 per cent. of the cost of education in Burma is met by communities, the restoration of people's income-earning capacity will have an important effect on their ability to educate their children.

DFID is now considering how best to assist recovery in the cyclone affected areas of Burma over the next two years, including possible direct support to the education sector.

DFID's long-term funding to UNICEF and Save the Children for primary and pre-school education across Burma is continuing

Burma: Storms

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what discussions he has had with his counterparts in (a) the European Union and (b) the USA on funding for the second year of the response to the cyclone in Burma. (228529)

Officials from the Department for International Development (DFID) participate in frequent meetings with other donors in Rangoon where future spending plans are discussed. These meetings are usually attended by representatives of the USA and the European Commission.

DFID officials in Rangoon recently held discussions with the European Commission on the prospect of setting up a joint fund to support rural livelihoods, which will be critical to many of the most vulnerable households in the cyclone-affected area. DFID staff also undertook a joint review with the European Commission on UNICEF’s education programme, which considered options for cyclone recovery funding over the next two years.

DFID’s own contribution to cyclone recovery activities for 2009 and 2010 is currently under consideration.

In July, I wrote to a range of like-minded development Ministers urging them to offer generous support to the United Nations appeal for Burma. I have also offered support to the United Nations in its efforts to encourage other donors to contribute more to the Burma appeal. DFID and FCO staff have followed up these initiatives through bilateral contacts with other donors and in international fora.

Departmental Consultants

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development pursuant to the answer of 15 October 2008, Official Report, column 1339W, on departmental consultants, on what projects expenditure was incurred in each of those years; how much was spent on each such project; and which consultants were employed on each such project. (229321)

The answer of 15 October 2008, Official Report, column 1339W, provided the Department for International Development's (DFID) overall expenditure on consultancy contracts for the past five financial years. However, to provide a detailed list of expenditure against individual contracts for each of the last five years would incur disproportionate costs.

A list of all contracts awarded since January 2005 is available on DFID's website:

http://www.dfid.gov.uk/procurement/contractslet.asp

This includes the original contract value and the name of the consultant engaged to deliver each contract. The information published on our website does not cover lower value contracts issued by DFID departments or overseas offices under delegated authority. To provide details of contracts awarded prior to January 2005 would also incur disproportionate costs.

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development pursuant to the answer of 15 October 2008, Official Report, column 1339W, on departmental consultants, what his Department’s projected spend on consultants is in 2008-09; and if he will make a statement. (229322)

The use of consultancy is determined by the various divisions within the Department for International Development (DFID), on the basis of a clear business case. Most of DFID’s consultancy expenditure is for services to the development programme, rather than for assistance with in-house tasks. The nature of development assistance means that DFID does not produce aggregate forecasts of consultancy expenditure.

Departmental Public Relations

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what the cost was of (a) entertainment, (b) advertising and promotion and (c) public relations consultancy to his Department in 2007-08. (228153)

The information is as follows:

(a) The Department for International Development's (DFID) total spend on entertainment within administration cost budgets for 2007-08 was £271,587. This figure includes costs for working breakfasts and lunches, refreshments at meetings and official entertainment. All entertainment is made in accordance with published departmental guidance on financial procedures and propriety.

(b) In financial year 2007-08, DFID’s main advertising cost was for recruitment and procurement. Advertising for these purposes cost £242,652. Other promotional and advertising includes building knowledge and understanding of development (particularly in schools), working in-country to improve health or other outcomes, and consulting with key stakeholders on development policy and implementation. These costs are integrated in our programme. It is therefore not possible to disaggregate figures from overall budgets without incurring disproportionate cost.

(c) In financial year 2007-08, our communications division had only one contract at a cost of £84,961.59 + VAT.

Developing Countries: Natural Disasters

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development (1) what steps the Government has taken to improve the support given to developing countries immediately following natural disasters; (228313)

(2) what steps the Government has taken to encourage other countries to provide emergency service personnel to developing countries immediately after a natural disaster.

The Department for International Development (DFID) gives substantial support to developing countries following natural disasters.

DFID’s natural disaster response has been scrutinised and praised in recent years by Parliament’s International Development and Public Accounts Committees, by the National Audit Office and by the Development Assistance Committee of the OECD. We regularly monitor our own humanitarian responses and the partners that we fund, including through field visits to project sites. In the case of major disasters, there is usually an external scrutiny of the overall response. In the case of our Burma response, we are planning to supplement this with a thorough independent evaluation of our own contribution.

DFID works closely with the Governments and other authorities of developing countries affected by natural disasters, both in operational response and through longer term programmes to help those countries with measures to reduce and mitigate disaster risks. Most lives saved in a natural disaster are saved in the immediate few days by family members, local people and local organisations.

We encourage other countries to provide emergency personnel in several ways. We provide both funding and UK experts to the global United Nations Disaster Assessment and Co-ordination (UNDAC) network which sends international teams to disaster zones. We also support the EU’s Civil Protection Mechanism for disaster response by providing search and rescue capability and we co-operate with a number of fellow European countries to provide combined response through a network called the International Humanitarian Partnership.

Overseas Aid

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development pursuant to the answer of 13 October 2008, Official Report, column 993W, on overseas aid, what his Department's definition of a low value contract is. (228693)

The answer of 13 October 2008, Official Report, column 993W, referred to ‘low value contracts’ issued under delegated authority by the Department for International Development's (DFID) various UK departments and overseas offices. Our definition of low value contracts are those contracts issued with a financial value below the EU threshold for services (currently set at £90,319). The majority of low value contracts let under delegated authority have a value below £25,000.

Pakistan: Earthquakes

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what assistance the Government provided to the Government of Pakistan following the 2005 earthquake. (228312)

In the first six months after the October 2005 earthquake the Department for International Development (DFID) provided £53 million for emergency relief to help the 3.5 million people affected. This support included the provision of water and sanitation, shelter, food and helicopter and aeroplane flights to get aid to where it was most needed.

Since then, we have been working closely with the Government of Pakistan on the reconstruction and rehabilitation process with support totalling £49 million to date.

South America: Research

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development pursuant to the answer of 13 October 2008, Official Report, column 995W, on South America: research, what priority themes were identified by the International Development Research Centre for Asia and Latin America; when consideration of the studies will be completed; what the cost of the scoping work is expected to be; and how many training places have been created as a result of this work. (228692)

The Department for International Development has co-funded with the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) scoping studies related to climate change adaptation research in Asia and Latin America.

In Latin America as a whole, the priority adaptation research themes identified were agriculture, governance, health, social protection, migration, water, financial institutions and disaster risk reduction. Similar themes were identified in the Asia study.

The total cost of the scoping work is expected to be around £600,000, of which DFID will contribute £400,000. DFID’s consideration of the scoping work is expected to be complete by the end of March 2009.

No training places were created as a result of the scoping studies.

Children, Schools and Families

Academies: Armed Forces

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the number of academies linked to schools associated with military establishments. (227903)

There are no military organisations sponsoring academies, but a growing number of academies are developing Cadet Forces, sometimes in partnership with other schools.

The Wellington Academy in Wiltshire will be close to a military base, and is working with the military and other partners to enrich the opportunities the Academy offers its students and local community. This also reflects the aspirations of the Academy's sponsor, Wellington College, which itself has military connections.

Academies: Sponsorship

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many private sponsors of (a) existing and (b) planned academies have had discussions with his Department about withdrawing from the programme; and if he will make a statement. (227723)

One sponsor, Amey, has discussed withdrawing from an existing academy. We are not in similar discussions with any other sponsors of open or planned academies.

Since the first academies opened in 2002 one lead sponsor withdrew after signing a funding agreement, but before the academy opened. In this instance a new lead sponsor took over. There have also been two instances of co-sponsors withdrawing from projects after signing the funding agreement. On both occasions the other co-sponsors continued with the projects.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families whether any women have acted as individual sponsors of academy schools. (227749)

There have not been any women acting as individual sponsors of academies, but there are a number of women who are part of a sponsorship team behind an academy, or who run the operations of sponsoring organisations.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what powers he has to dismiss any academy sponsor; and when those powers have been exercised. (227750)

The Secretary of State may, at any time and in certain circumstances, by notice in writing, terminate the funding agreement with an academy sponsor. These circumstances include insolvency or if the academy trust has passed a resolution for its winding up. The Secretary of State may also terminate the funding agreement if the chief inspector gives a notice to the academy trust stating that in his opinion special measures are required to be taken in relation to the academy. However, he would usually only do so if the academy trust had not made and acted upon a written statement of the action the trust proposes to take, and the period within which it proposes to take such action. In all other circumstances the Secretary of State, or the academy trust, may give not less than seven academy financial years’ written notice to terminate the funding agreement.

The Secretary of State may appoint additional governors as he thinks fit if he has given the governors a warning notice in accordance with the articles of association and the governors have failed to comply with the notice to his satisfaction. With a majority of the governors, the Secretary of State would have the power to dismiss the sponsor, through amendments to the memorandum and articles.

The Department carry out rigorous checks to establish the suitability of individuals and organisations to become sponsors of academies. These include checking their financial viability to supply the funds pledged as well as their general suitability.

To date, the Secretary of State has not terminated a funding agreement with an academy trust, or flooded the governing body to dismiss an academy sponsor.

Adoption

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many adopted children waited longer than (a) 12, (b) 18, (c) 24, (d) 30, (e) 36, (d) 42 and (e) 48 months to be adopted following the decision that adoption was in their best interests in each of the last five years, broken down by ethnicity. (228707)

Information on looked after children adopted during the year ending 31 March 2008 can be found in the following table. Information for earlier years can be provided only at a disproportionate cost. The figures shown for the time between the decision that adoption was in the child's best interest and the date of the making of the adoption order are cumulative.

Looked after children adopted during the year ending 31 March 2008 by the time between the decision that adoption was in their best interest and the making of the adoption order: England

Number

Time between decisions that adoption was in the best interest and adoption

Over 12 months

Over 18 months

Over 24 months

Over 30 months

Over 36 months

Over 42 months

Over 48 months

All children looked after/ adopted during the year

3,200

2,400

1,300

720

390

260

150

100

Ethnic origin

White

2,600

1,900

1,000

550

290

190

110

80

Mixed

330

290

170

110

60

40

20

10

Asian or British Asian

60

40

20

10

10

Black or Black British

110

100

80

40

30

30

20

10

Other ethnic groups

30

20

10

10

10

Source:

SSDA903 return on children looked after.

Once the child has been placed for adoption with approved prospective adopters it is for them to decide when to apply to the court for an adoption order. However, the child has to live with the prospective adopters for 10 weeks preceding the application.

After School Clubs

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much his Department spent on (a) after-school facilities and (b) holiday clubs in each of the last 10 years. (228661)

The Government have made a commitment that by 2010 all schools will be providing access to a core range of extended services, including a varied menu of activities from 8 am to 6 pm as well as provision during the school holidays. There are currently over 14,000 schools (65 per cent.) providing extended services.

In order to support delivery of extended schools, significant funding has been made available. £840 million was made available between 2003 to 2008 and an additional £1.3 billion has been committed for the period 2008 to 2011.

It is for each local authority, in consultation with schools and other children’s services partners, to make decisions on how best to use this funding to support schools develop extended services, based on local needs. The Department centrally does not hold a breakdown of how much funding has been spent on particular elements of the core offer, including after-school facilities and holiday clubs.

Building Schools for the Future Programme

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much his Department is planning to spend on the Building Schools for the Future programme in each year from 2011-12 to 2021-22; and if he will make a statement. (229464)

The Government are committed to the continued delivery of the Building Schools for the Future programme, as demonstrated by the recent consultation on future roll-out and our desire to bring new authorities into the programme as quickly as is practicable. However, planned spending on the programme from 2011-12 will be subject to future spending decisions.

Children: Asylum

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what guidance his Department gives to local authorities on the placement of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children who are suspected to be victims of human trafficking. (228709)

The Government recognise the particular vulnerability of unaccompanied asylum seeking children who may have been trafficked into the UK. This is why in December 2007 we issued “Safeguarding Children who may have been Trafficked”, to supplement the statutory guidance, “Working Together to Safeguard Children”. Paragraphs 7.55 to 7.64 of this further guidance provides information for local authorities about the steps they will need to take to ensure that any potentially trafficked child that they look after is effectively safeguarded.

Crayford Academy

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what progress has been made on plans for the proposed Crayford Academy. (227823)

The Crayford Academy is five months into the feasibility stage.

The funding agreement is due to be submitted to the Secretary of State for approval in March 2009. If the Secretary of State approves the funds to move into the implementation stage, the planned opening will be in temporary accommodation in September 2009. The final outline business case approval is planned for March 2009 which will allow the new building to be occupied by September 2010.

The LA statutory school closure has commenced and is due to be complete by 2 February 2009. The Academy's consultation commenced on 1 October and is due to complete by January 2009.

Departmental Civil Service Agencies

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many agencies were sponsored by his Department or its predecessors in (a) 2007-08 and (b) 1997-98. (228508)

The “Next Steps Report 1997” (Cm3889) provides information on all Executive agencies as at 31 December 1997. Copies are available from the Library of the House. The most up-to-date list of Executive agencies is published in the Cabinet Office publication “The List of Ministerial Responsibilities”. The latest version, incorporating recent ministerial changes, will be published shortly. Copies will be placed in the Libraries of the House.

Departmental Information and Communications Technology

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much his Department spent on upgrading its IT in each of the last three financial years. (228415)

The Department for Children Schools and Families has spent the following amounts upgrading its IT in each of the last three full financial years.

Financial year

£

2007-08

£5,713,906

2006-07

£7,208,065

2005-06

£9,191,897

The Department has also spent £1,673,073 in the current financial year (2008-09) to date.

Departmental Publications

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families which magazines and other publications his Department distributes to (a) primary schools and (b) secondary schools on a regular basis. (228793)

The Department produces and distributes to (a) primary schools a copy of “Primary Teachers” magazine. It also produces and distributes to (b) secondary schools a copy of “Secondary Teachers” magazine.

The Department also produces “Governors” magazine and distributes this to both primary and secondary schools.

In addition, 10 issues of “Spectrum” are produced a year and distributed to all head teachers and chairs of governors. “Spectrum” provides schools with a summary of all the latest resources, publications, guidance and regulations.

Foster Care: Grandparents

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many children were fostered by a grandparent in each of the last 10 years, broken down by local authority. (228713)

This information is not collected centrally by the Department.

However, table A3, taken from the Statistical First Release (SFR 23/2008) entitled ‘Children looked after in England (including adoption and care leavers) year ending 31 March 2008’ shows the number of children looked after by English local authorities, who were placed with a foster carer who was either a relative or friend at 31 March for each year from 2004 to 2008. The SFR is located at:

http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000810/index.shtml

and table A3 can be found within the first set of Excel tables on the website.

Further Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what surveys his Department has conducted to estimate the proportion of the school student population which wishes to stay on in full-time education beyond the age of 16 years; and what the findings were. (227898)

There are a number of surveys which have been conducted by the Department which have asked young people about their intentions after age 16:

Longitudinal Study of Young People in England

The Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE) is a longitudinal (panel) study of young people. In the first interview or ‘wave' of LSYPE (Spring 2004), sample members were asked at age 13/14 what their intentions were after Year 11. The results show that at age 13/14 78 per cent. of LSYPE respondents intended to stay on in full-time education either at the school they were currently attending or somewhere else. LSYPE did not ask about intentions to other learning routes.

Tellus2 and Tellus3

Tellus2 and Tellus3 were national online surveys of pupils in years 6, 8 and 10, carried out to gather the views of children and young people on topics relating to the five Every Child Matters outcomes. The relevant question asked: What do you hope to do when you leave school? (Years 8 and 10 only). The results are as follows:

Percentage

Get a job at 16

Study and get a job at 18

Study and go to university

Something else

Don't know

Tellus2 average nationally

16

17

50

7

10

Tellus3 average nationally

13

19

54

6

9

Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) Pilots

Various surveys of 21,500 young people who were in their final year of compulsory education in 1999 or 2000 were carried out for the evaluation of the EMA pilots. 78 per cent. wanted to stay in full-time education after age 16, 18 per cent. wanted to enter work or training and 4 per cent. were undecided or wanted something else.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many pupils stayed in education in 2008 after the age of 16 having attended a secondary school (a) with and (b) without a sixth form. (228682)

The official measure of post-16 participation cannot be disaggregated by the type of secondary school previously attended. However, using matched administrative data, we can estimate post-16 participation rates by characteristics of the school attended at age 15, including whether or not that school had a sixth form. These estimates, shown in the following table, exclude post-16 participation in independent schools.

Participation of 16-year-olds in education and training by whether secondary school had a sixth form, mainstream maintained schools in England, 2006/07

Percentage

No sixth form

Sixth form

All mainstream maintained schools1

Full-time education

73

79

77

Part-time education

4

3

3

Work-based learning (WBL)

8

6

7

Total education and WBL

85

88

87

1 Excludes special schools, pupil referral units and independent schools.

Source:

Matched Administrative Data, 19 in 2009 cohort.

General Certificate of Secondary Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) pursuant to the answer of 7 October 2008, Official Report, columns 590-91W, on the general certificate of secondary education, what estimate he has made of the cost of providing the requested information in full; (227379)

(2) pursuant to the answer of 7 October 2008, Official Report, column 591W, on languages: general certificate of secondary education, what estimate he has made of the cost of providing the requested information.

It was estimated that the cost of answering the closely related questions would be over £4,000.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what proportion of pupils who did not gain a single grade C or above at GCSE in 2008 were resident in the 50 per cent. most deprived areas of the country. (228836)

The Department publishes the following GCSE attainment indicators by deprivation of residence in the National Pupil Database (NPD) Statistical First Release.

Proportion of pupils at the end of key stage 4 achieving five or more A*-C grades;

Proportion of pupils at the end of key stage 4 achieving five or more A*-C grades including English and Maths; and

Proportion of pupils at the end of key stage 4 achieving any passes.

2008 information will be published in December.

Gifted Children: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) what the budget of the Young Gifted and Talented programme is in 2008-09; (228795)

(2) what the value is of the contract awarded to CfBT to deliver the Young Gifted and Talented Programme.

The cost of the contract with CfBT for the Young Gifted and Talented (YG and T) programme is commercial in confidence. The Department has historically spent some £10 million to £20 million annually on the full national programme for gifted and talented education, of which YG and T now forms a significant part.

Higher Education: Admissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what plans he has to increase the number of people from low-income backgrounds who study at university. (227615)

I have been asked to reply.

This Government remain totally committed to widening participation in higher education (HE), for those from poorer or other backgrounds which are currently under-represented. And we are making encouraging progress—in the 2002/03 academic year, 27.9 per cent. of young full-time first degree entrants to HE came from lower socio-economic classes. By the 2006/07 academic year, this had risen to 29.8 per cent.—an increase of 1.9 per cent. Alongside this, in the 2002/03 academic year, 44.1 per cent. of 18 to 20-year-olds from higher socio-economic classes participated in HE, compared with 17.5 per cent. of those from lower socio-economic classes—a gap of 26.5 per cent. By 2006/07, the participation rate of higher socio-economic classes had fallen to 39.5 per cent. and that of lower socio-economic classes had risen to 19.0 per cent.—reducing the gap by six percentage points to 20.5 per cent.

There is a range of current and emerging interventions designed to widen participation in HE, including:

(a) The Aimhigher programme, a national outreach programme which seeks to widen participation in HE through local partnerships of universities, colleges and schools which co-design and deliver activities to raise attainment, aspiration and application levels of young people from backgrounds currently under-represented in HE;

(b) Aimhigher Associates—is a new mentoring scheme which will be piloted in late 2008 and rolled out nationally in 2009. Associates will be HE students who will provide targeted support for and sharing of personal experience with young people through key transitions in their school and/or college careers, with a view to enabling their successful application to HE;

(c) the Higher Education Funding Council for England’s Widening Participation Allocation, which supports the additional costs of recruiting and retaining students from non-traditional backgrounds; and

(d) HEI/school links—that are both structural and sustained. DIUS is promoting a range of ways in which universities can get involved with schools, including sponsoring academies and trusts.

National Assessment Agency: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the National Assessment Agency budget has been in each year since its establishment; and if he will make a statement. (228637)

The National Assessment Agency (NAA) was launched in April 2004 to safeguard and modernise the delivery of exams, tests and assessment. It is a division of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). Its responsibilities have included delivery of national curriculum assessments and the exams modernisation programme. NAA's annual expenditure in each financial year since establishment has been:

£

2004-05

42,959,562

2005-06

81,842,760

2006-07

87,657,671

2007-08

87,932,756

National Curriculum Tests

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) when Lord Sutherland's report on Key Stage Testing in 2008 will be published; and if he will make a statement; (228582)

(2) when Ofqual received Lord Sutherland's interim report into the management of the Key Stage tests in 2008; and if he will publish the interim report.

Lord Sutherland is conducting an inquiry into the problems that occurred in 2008 with the delivery of national curriculum tests. Lord Sutherland met with the Ofqual Committee on 16 October to provide an update on the progress of his inquiry. Lord Sutherland has indicated that he does not intend to publish an interim report. The inquiry anticipates presenting the final recommendations to Ofqual and the Secretary of State before the end of the year and this report will be published.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families when Ministers or officials from his Department met (a) the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, (b) the National Assessment Agency and (c) ETS to discuss the 2008 key stage tests between December 2007 and July 2008; and if he will make a statement. (228586)

Neither I nor my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State have met ETS. We do, however, regularly meet with the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, of which the National Assessment Agency is a division. Recent meetings have included discussions on the administration and marking of key stage tests in 2008, which are now the subject of an independent inquiry being chaired by Lord Sutherland.

DCSF officials also have regular meetings with QCA and NAA and have attended some joint meetings with NAA and ETS.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) for what reasons ETS was required to undertake face to face training for markers of the 2008 key stage tests, rather than online marking training; when this decision was made; and if he will make a statement; (228588)

(2) what requests were made by ETS for changes in the key stage 2 and 3 marking contract for the 2008 tests; which of these requests were (a) granted and (b) refused; how long it took for a decision to be made in each case; and if he will make a statement;

(3) how many changes to the key stage 2 and 3 contract with ETS were made by (a) the National Assessment Agency and (b) the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority between September 2007 and July 2008; what the content was of each such change; when the changes were notified; and if he will make a statement;

(4) what warnings were given by ETS to (a) the National Assessment Agency and (b) the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority about risks in delivering the 2008 key stage tests in (i) 2007 and (ii) 2008; when these were made; and if he will make a statement;

(5) when ETS asked the National Assessment Agency and the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority to terminate its contract for the key stage tests; and if he will make a statement.

The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) is responsible for the development and administration of National Curriculum tests. The National Assessment Agency (NAA) administers the tests and managed the delivery contract with ETS Europe, on QCA's behalf.

The contract awarded to ETS required face-to-face training of markers to continue as usual. During the procurement process suppliers were encouraged to offer improvements or innovations to improve marking quality.

Schedule 1 of the contract required ETS to pilot and seek approval for innovations that did not replicate the existing process at the effective date of the contract. It was agreed that ETS would plan and conduct a pilot to ensure suitability and robustness.

The NAA agreed to accept three of the proposed marking improvements, standardisation, benchmarking and online mark entry. NAA rejected mandatory online training for experienced maths and science markers, but allowed it to be used on an opt-in basis. The NAA believed online marker training could make an important contribution in later cycles. However, the marker ratings made it clear that the ETS online marker training as trialled would cause significant dissatisfaction and attrition during a critical period of the delivery cycle.

ETS Europe first alerted the NAA concerning a potential failure in delivering the 2008 National Curriculum test results in late June 2008. The first “without prejudice” discussion at which ETS Europe indicated it may be interested in terminating the contract, occurred on 8 July 2008.

The following table outlines the changes that were suggested for the 2008 test cycle.

Change control summary—2008 National Curriculum test cycle

Description

Date

Initiated by

Acceptance

Statutory collection of reasons for KS3 absence

2 April 2007

DCSF

NAA carried out this work

Removal of year 7 progress tests from contract scope

2 April 2007

DCSF

Accepted by NAA and ETS

Provision of component level reviews for KS2 and KS3 English

2 April 2007

DCSF

NAA carried out this work

Provision of KS2 English item level results data

2 April 2007

DCSF

Rejected by NAA and ETS

Removal of KS3 ICT results data from contract scope

2 April 2007

DCSF

Accepted by NAA and ETS

Transportation security (request to remove the contractual requirement to ‘double man’ vehicles carrying bulk test material)

15 November 2007

ETS

Rejected by NAA

Fire security (request to remove the contractual requirement to install sprinkler systems in central distribution warehouse)

15 November 2007

ETS

Accepted by NAA

Additional CCTV cameras to improve security of central distribution warehouse)

1 February 2008

NAA

Accepted by ETS

Cost of providing face-to-face marker training for experienced Maths and Science markers following rejection of online training

12 February 2008

ETS

Rejected by NAA

Cost of 'additional' markers which ETS intended to recruit above 10,000 estimate

29 February 2008

ETS

Rejected by NAA

Publication of schools guide which ETS claim was not included in the definitive ‘book of work’

29 February 2008

ETS

Rejected by NAA

Cost of ‘additional’ schools which ETS claimed were not specified in the contract

29 February 2008

ETS

Rejected by NAA

Cost of marking pilot which ETS claimed was more extensive than originally scoped

29 February 2008

ETS

Rejected by NAA

Cost of paying ‘additional’ fees to markers which were above those paid for 2007

29 February 2008

ETS

Rejected by NAA

Additional fees paid to KS2 and KS3 Maths markers to recognise high level of marks data entry required by this subject

27 May 2008

ETS

Accepted by NAA (NAA met the cost of this change)

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families for what reasons there was not a full-scale logistics pilot for the 2008 key stage 2 and 3 tests; and if he will make a statement. (228589)

The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) is responsible for the development and administration of national curriculum tests. The National Assessment Agency (NAA) administers the tests and managed the delivery contract with ETS Europe on QCA's behalf.

ETS Europe did not propose a full-scale logistics pilot to the NAA for the 2008 KS2 and KS3 tests. In July 2007, ETS proposed a pilot involving a maximum of 100 schools. The final pilot proposal presented by ETS in December 2007 only required the involvement of 50 schools.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what options his Department has considered for the publication of key stage 2 test results for schools taking the single level tests; and if he will make a statement. (228638)

All schools' end of key stage 2 test results will continue to be published in the achievement and attainment tables.

Schools whose pupils took single level tests in December 2007 and June 2008 have been notified of the outcome.

The Making Good Progress pilot is being externally evaluated by PricewaterhouseCoopers. Analysis of the first two rounds of single level tests will be included as part of their interim report on the first year of the pilot; to be published later this year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families if he will publish the minutes of the meeting between the National Assessment Agency and Ofqual on 21 February 2008; and if he will make a statement. (228821)

The Department does not hold the minutes of meetings which take place between the National Assessment Agency (NAA) and the Office of the Qualifications and Examinations Regulator (Ofqual). The hon. Member may wish to approach the NAA and/or Ofqual directly for this information.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families pursuant to the statement of 14 October 2008, Official Report, columns 673-87, on national curriculum tests, for what reasons his Department has decided not to move to internal marking of key stage 2 tests with external moderation; and if he will make a statement. (228978)

Key stage 2 results are a robust and consistent source of information for parents at a crucial transition point for their child as they move on to secondary school. The tests provide a view of the progress of every child, allowing teachers to best meet the needs of each child. The tests are also important in providing a suitable level of accountability for the public to hold national and local government and governing bodies to account on the performance of schools. It is appropriate that tests used for such purposes should be externally marked.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many companies have tendered to provide the 2009 Key Stage 2 standard assessment tests; and if he will make a statement. (229002)

The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) is responsible for the development and administration of national curriculum tests. The National Assessment Agency (NAA) administers the tests on QCA’s behalf, including the 2009 procurement process.

NAA advise that the Invitation to Tender for the 2009 procurement process has not yet ended. Information about the number of companies tendering for the work will not be released until a supplier has been appointed.

Pre-school Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) which local authorities are involved in the pilot schemes to extend the pre-school education entitlement to two-year-olds; and if he will make a statement; (228676)

(2) what estimate he has made of the take-up of the pre-school education entitlement among two-year-olds in each local authority participating in a pilot scheme; and if he will make a statement.

The pilot is currently operating in 32 local authorities and has benefited approximately 13,500 children. From January 2009 the extended pilot will operate in a further 31 local authorities and we anticipate that over a further 20,000 children will benefit. The full list of 63 local authorities is:

Barking and Dagenham

Barnsley

Birmingham

Blackburn

Blackpool

Bradford

Brent

Bristol

Camden

Cornwall

Derbyshire

Devon

Doncaster

Dudley

Durham

Ealing

Enfield

Essex

Gloucestershire

Greenwich

Hackney

Haringey

Hartlepool

Hertfordshire

Hounslow

Hull

Islington

Kent

Knowsley

Lambeth

Lancashire

Leeds

Leicestershire

Lewisham

Liverpool

Luton

Manchester

Middlesbrough

Newcastle

Newham

Norfolk

North Somerset

Nottingham

Peterborough

Portsmouth

Rochdale

Rotherham

Salford

Sandwell

Sheffield

Slough

South Tyneside

Southwark

Stoke

Sunderland

Telford and Wrekin

Tower Hamlets

Wakefield

Waltham Forest

Westminster

Worcestershire

Wolverhampton

York.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families pursuant to the answer of 13 October 2008, Official Report, column 1133W, on pre-school education, what the timescale is for the pilots underway in 63 local authorities. (229764)

32 local authorities have been engaged in delivering a pilot, free early education entitlement for two-year-olds, since 2006. We have invited those local authorities, to participate in the extended scheme from 2008. A further 31 local authorities will commence delivery of the extended scheme in phases from January 2009. The extended scheme will run until April 2011.

Pre-school Education: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) what estimate he has made of the number of (a) untrained staff and (b) staff trained to level (i) one, (ii) two and (iii) three working in (A) private, voluntary and independent sector and (B) maintained sector nurseries; (229699)

(2) what estimate he has made of the number of people with (a) a Cache level three, (b) a BTEC national diploma and (c) an NVQ level three in childcare in each year since 1997.

The Childcare and Early Years Providers Survey collects information on staff qualifications that are relevant to working with children and young people. The qualifications are grouped together in the levels that they have been accredited by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. Table 1 shows the number of paid staff in full day care providers by the highest level of qualification held.

Table 1: Number of paid staff in full day care providers by the highest level of qualification held, 20071

Full day care providers: type of ownership

Highest level of qualification held

Private number

Voluntary number

Local authority number

School/college number

Other number

Level 1

650

450

60

90

0

Level 2

16,600

5,100

700

950

500

Level 3

65,900

14,000

5,900

5,500

2,400

Level 4 or above

11,700

2,700

1,300

1,300

350

No relevant qualification

9,300

3,000

700

700

250

1 The figures within this table have been rounded.

DCSF does not hold data on the certificates issued by specific awarding bodies.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the additional number of staff who will have to enter the childcare sector to extend the free entitlement (a) from 12 and a half to 15 hours and (b) to all two year olds. (229702)

Each local authority has a duty to secure the free early education entitlement in their area including the need to ensure that there are providers with appropriate staffing to enable them to do so. More details of the extension of the free early education entitlement for two-year-olds will be available in the child care strategy announced in June and to be published by the end of this year.

Primary Education: Class Sizes

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many and what proportion of pupils of primary school age in maintained schools are in classes of (a) fewer than 20, (b) 20 to 24, (c) 25 to 28, (d) 29 to 30, (e) 31 to 35, (f) 36 to 40 and (g) more than 40 pupils; and if he will make a statement. (229021)

The available information is given in the table.

Maintained primary schools1: Classes taught by one teacher2—as at January 2008—England

Classes taught by one teacher

Key Stage 1 classes3

Key Stage 2 classes

Classes in maintained primary schools

Classes of size:

Number of pupils

Percentage of pupils

Number of pupils

Percentage of pupils

Number of pupils

Percentage of pupils

Less than 20 pupils

84,540

6.2

68,530

3.6

203,760

5.5

20 to 24 pupils

273,590

20.0

284,630

14.8

649,420

17.5

25 to 28 pupils

410,580

30.0

570,220

29.6

1,110,010

29.9

29 to 30 pupils

574,390

42.0

598,890

31.1

1,246,740

33.6

31 to 35 pupils

24,240

1.8

387,220

20.1

454,070

12.3

36 to 40 pupils

380

0.0

18,200

0.9

34,110

0.9

Greater than 40 pupils

140

0.0

840

0.0

8,500

0.2

Total

1,367,860

100.0

1,928,530

100.0

3,706,620

100.0

1 Includes middle schools as deemed.

2 Classes as taught during a single selected period on the day of the Census in January.

3 Includes Reception classes.

Note:

Pupil numbers have been rounded to the nearest 10.

Source:

School Census

Pupil Referral Units: Special Educational Needs

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many pupil referral units do not have provision for pupils with special educational needs, broken down by local authority. (229626)

According to my Department’s record of information supplied by local authorities at the time of registration, 366 pupil referral units catered for pupils with special educational needs and 184 pupil referral units did not indicate whether they catered for pupils with special educational needs. However, pupils with special educational needs are likely to be attending all types of school and other provision, so there are likely to be children with special educational needs in pupil referral units in addition to the 366.

Pupils: Per Capita Costs

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much was spent per head of the population on education in (a) rural and (b) urban areas in 2007-08. (228110)

The latest figures available are shown in the following table (2006-07). Figures for 2007-08 are still being collected and validated by the Department for Children, Schools and Families.

Combined local authority and school based expenditure per pupil1: 2006-07: Cash terms figures as reported by local authorities in England as at 15 October 20082

Total combined LEA and school based expenditure1 (£ per pupil)

England

4,710

Predominantly urban local authorities2

4,730

Predominantly rural local authorities2

4,540

1 Combined local authority and school based expenditure includes all expenditure on the education of children in local authority maintained establishments and pupils educated by the authority other than in maintained establishments. This includes both school based expenditure and all elements of central LA expenditure except youth and community and capital expenditure from revenue (CERA). Certain elements of central local authority expenditure cannot be attributed to a particular phase of education and consequently a sector breakdown is not available. Pupil figures include all pre-primary pupils, including those under fives funded by the authority and being educated in private settings, pupils educated in maintained mainstream schools and any other local authority maintained pupils. All pupil numbers are adjusted to be on a financial year basis.

2 The classification of local authorities into those which are predominately urban and predominately rural is based upon The Rural and Urban Area Classification (2004) sponsored by the Countryside Agency (CA), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), Office for National Statistics (ONS), the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) and the Welsh Assembly Government. Predominantly rural local authorities are classified as those which consist of more than 50 per cent. rural output areas.

Note:

Figures are rounded to the nearest £10.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the average financial allocation per pupil was in (a) Devon local authority area and (b) England in each of the last five years. (228871)

The revenue funding figures per pupil aged 3-19 in real terms for Devon local authority and the England average for years 2004-05 to 2005-06 are as follows:

2004-05

2005-06

Devon

3,960

4,160

England

4,270

4,480

The revenue per pupil figures shown in the following table are taken from the dedicated schools grant (DSG) which was introduced in April 2006. They are not comparable with those for the years 2004-05 to 2005-06 because the introduction of the DSG in 2006-07 fundamentally changed how local authorities are funded.

The 2004-05 to 2005-06 figures are based on Education Formula Spending (EFS) which formed the education part of the Local Government Finance Settlement, plus various grants. This was an assessment of what local authorities needed to fund education rather than what they spent. The DSG is based largely on an authority's previous spending. In addition, the DSG has a different coverage to EFS. EFS comprised a schools block and an LEA block (to cover LEA central functions), whereas DSG covers only the school block. LEA block items are still funded through DCLG's Local Government Finance Settlement but education items cannot be separately identified. Consequently, there is a break in the Department's time series as the two sets of data are not comparable.

To provide a comparison for 2006-07 DSG, the Department have isolated the schools block equivalent funding in 2005-06; as described above this does not represent the totality of “education” funding in that year.

The figures are for all funded pupils aged 3-19 and are in real terms.

DSG baseline plus grantsDSG plus grants

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

Devon

3,840

3,980

4,120

4,150

England

4,230

4,370

4,530

4,560

Note: Price Base: Real terms at 2007-08 prices, based on GDP deflators as at 30 September 2008.

Qualifications

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what plans he has for the future of BTEC qualifications. (229025)

In our 14-19 Qualifications Strategy we set out our criteria for public funding. We will in future direct funding to one of the four national routes: GCSE/A level; Diplomas; Apprenticeship and FLT.

BTECs are currently available within Diplomas; Apprenticeships and FLT and will therefore continue to be eligible for public funding. We have stated our intention to reduce the number of qualifications taken as standalones including the BTEC. There will be a gradual and managed transition to the new 14-19 offer as the national suites become widely available, with the primary consideration being meeting the needs of learners.

This will not impact on the availability of standalone vocational qualifications for adults.

Schools: Assessments

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many people who were entered for a (a) GCSE and (b) A Level did not sit one or more exams in each of the last five years. (224796)

Schools: Bureaucracy

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what average proportion of (a) primary and (b) secondary school teacher's working time was spent (i) completing Government-originated forms and (ii) classroom teaching in the most recent period for which figures are available. (227897)

The Department does not hold any information about the time teachers spend completing Government-originated forms.

The available information on the average number of hours per week spent by teachers about different activities is published by the Office of Manpower Economics (OME) and summarised in the following table:

Average time worked per week by full-time classroom teachers, total hours and proportions spent on grouped activities (March 2008)

Percentage

Primary classroom teachers

Secondary classroom teachers

Teaching

33

38

PPA

33

30

Non-teaching pupil/parent contact

11

14

School/staff management

7

6

General Admin. Support

9

6

Individual/professional activity

6

5

Other

1

1

Total time on all working activities (hours)

52.2

49.9

These figures are based upon a sample survey of around 2,000 teachers in England and Wales during a single week in March 2008. The full report “Teachers’ Workloads Diary Survey” was published in August 2008 and can be found on the OME website at:

http://www.ome.uk.com/review.cfm?body=7

Schools: Land

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much land has been bought for educational use in England in (a) the last 12 months and (b) the last 10 years. (229055)

We do not hold information on land that has been bought for educational use in England by local authorities or other educational organisations.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how educational land is valued for sale. (229056)

Any application submitted for approval to sell a school playing field, under section 77 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, must include a valuation for the land in question. This valuation must be provided by the district valuer or an independent professionally-qualified valuer. It is expected that schools or local authorities should only sell publicly owned land for best value.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the area of educational land is in England; and what the average amount of land per school is. (229057)

Data on areas of school playing fields and external spaces were supplied to the Department by local education authorities in 2001 and 2003. However, the completeness and quality of data is insufficient to accurately assess the area of land in England that is occupied by schools for educational purposes, or to determine the average amount of land per school.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what restrictions are in place for the selling of educational land for residential use. (229074)

Educational land generally comprises the school buildings and the playing fields. The Secretary of State’s consent is not normally needed to sell school buildings. Before any school or local authority in England can sell a school playing field or any part of a school playing field, they must obtain the Secretary of State’s consent, under section 77 of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998. In the case of school buildings or playing field land which has been used in the last eight years for a community school, the local authority must seek confirmation from the Secretary of State that the land is not required for the purposes of an academy.

Any subsequent use of land is a matter for the local planning authority.

Schools: Sport

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what proportion of (a) primary schools and (b) secondary schools in Peterborough offer competitive sports as part of their curriculum. (229454)

All schools must provide competitive games activities, as this is a compulsory part of the physical education national curriculum.

Schools: Standards

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many national challenge schools will be entering national challenge trusts. (224871)

We are continuing to talk to all local authorities with national challenge schools as they develop plans for school improvement, including national challenge trusts, and will look to develop national challenge trusts where that is the most appropriate way to meet schools’ needs.

Schools: Stoke on Trent

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what assessment he has made of the likely effects on educational standards in Stoke-on-Trent over the next 10 years of the closure of Longton High School and Trentham High School. (228647)

DCSF officials have asked the council to set out its vision for transforming secondary education through a ‘Strategy for Change’ for BSF. This strategy must explain how the council proposes to raise secondary school standards and aspirations over the next 10 years, and address falling pupil numbers in the city. It will be assessed by the Department when formally submitted. The proposed plans for schools in Stoke are part of a strategic approach and should not be viewed in isolation.

Secondary Education: Assessments

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many students in maintained schools in September have begun working towards (a) the Cambridge Pre-U examination and (b) the International Baccalaureate. (227962)

The Department does not currently hold this information.

Information on the number of students entered for the Cambridge Pre-U exam and the International Baccalaureate in the 2008/09 academic year will be collected in the Autumn School Census (currently in progress). Initial results from the census will be available from January 2009.

Secondary Education: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the average amount of funding per student was in comprehensive secondary schools of (a) fewer than 100, (b) 100 to 199, (c) 200 to 299, (d) 300 to 399, (e) 400 to 499, (f) 500 to 599, (g) 600 to 699 and (h) 700 and above in (i) rural and (ii) non rural areas in the most recent year for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement. (227306)

The revenue funding that local authority maintained secondary schools in England receive (this excludes Academies) is a matter for individual local authorities to decide locally through their own local funding formulae (subject to satisfying the minimum funding guarantee for schools). Consequently, the amount of money allocated to each secondary school in England depends very much on the individual local authorities’ own policy for funding their schools.

The following table shows the cash terms figures as reported by local authorities as at 14 October 2008.

Children, Schools and Families Financial Data Collection (BUDGET): 2008-09—total budget share plus revenue grants1,2 per pupil3 allocated1 to local authority maintained secondary schools4,5 at the start of the 2008-09 financial year: cash terms figures6 as reported by local authorities as at 14 October 2008

Urban5 local authority maintained secondary schools4

Secondary schools (exc. middle deemed)

Middle deemed secondary schools

All secondary schools (inc. middle deemed)

Number of schools

Average budget share plus grants per pupil (£ per pupil)1,2,3,6

Number of schools

Average budget share plus grants per pupil (£ per pupil)1,2,3,6

Number of schools

Average budget share plus grants per pupil (£ per pupil)1,2,3,6

school size < 100 pupils

0

0

0

100 pupils <= School size < 200 pupils

3

7,830

3

4,570

6

6,180

200 pupils <= School size < 300 pupils

11

6,550

13

4,290

24

5,310

300 pupils <= School size < 400 pupils

28

5,930

34

3,840

62

4,780

400 pupils <= School size < 500 pupils

65

5,710

41

3,600

106

4,900

500 pupils <= School size < 600 pupils

98

5,440

28

3,430

126

5,000

600 pupils <= School size < 700 pupils

164

5,280

17

3,510

181

5,110

school size >= 700 pupils

2,162

4,660

11

4,200

2,173

4,660

Total (all school sizes)

2,531

4,720

147

3,710

2,678

4,690

Rural5 local authority maintained secondary schools6

Secondary schools (exc. middle deemed)

Middle deemed secondary schools

All secondary schools (inc. middle deemed)

Number of schools

Average budget share plus grants per pupil (£ per pupil)1,2,3,6

Number of schools

Average budget share plus grants per pupil (£ per pupil)1,2,3,6

Number of schools

Average budget share plus grants per pupil (£ per pupil)1,2,3,6

school size < 100 pupils

0

1

5,340

1

5,340

100 pupils <= School size < 200 pupils

5

6,890

8

4,850

13

5,710

200 pupils <= School size < 300 pupils

6

5,980

17

4,050

23

4,550

300 pupils <= School size < 400 pupils

16

5,150

19

3,660

35

4,350

400 pupils <= School size < 500 pupils

22

4,900

27

3,540

49

4,160

500 pupils <= School size < 600 pupils

40

4,560

6

3,420

46

4,420

600 pupils <= School size < 700 pupils

50

4,400

4

3,350

54

4,320

school size >= 700 pupils

323

4,280

3

3,670

326

4,280

Total (all school sizes)

462

4,340

85

3,670

547

4,290

1 Budget share plus grants is the combination of the schools individual budget share plus any revenue grants allocated to the school at the start of the financial year. For 2008-09 this comprises of the Total Budget Share plus any School Standards Grant (including personalisation), School Development Grant, Other Standards Fund Allocation, Threshold and Performance Pay and Support for Schools in Financial Difficulty allocated to schools at the start of the 2008-09 financial year. This does not include any capital funding allocated to schools.

2 The amount of money allocated to a school depends very much on the individual local authorities’ own policy for funding their schools. Different authorities retain varying amounts of funding centrally to spend on behalf of their schools while others chose to give schools more autonomy over how they spend their money by delegating more funding to the individual school.

3 The pupil numbers used to calculate the per pupil amounts and school size are as reported by the local authority on their Section 52 Budget Statement comprising of the full time equivalent number pupils registered at the school used for the initial determination of the school’s budget share under the local authority’s allocation formula.

4 Figures for secondary schools include any LSC funding and LSC pupils for schools with 6th forms. Excluded from the tables are any secondary schools which were reported as either opening or closing during the 2008-09 financial year.

5 The urban/rural classification is drawn from the Edubase (the DCSF database of educational establishments).

6 Funding figures are rounded to the nearest £10.

Source:

Funding data are drawn from local authorities’ 2008-09 Children, Schools and Families Budget Statements (Table 2) submitted to the DCSF. 5. The urban/rural classification is drawn from the Edubase (the DCSF database of educational establishments).

Social Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what steps his Department has taken to monitor trends in out-of-area placements made by social services. (228646)

Since 2005-06, the SSDA903 collection of data concerning looked after children has contained information on:

the local authority of placement at 31 March for children looked after on that date; and

the distance in miles between their address at 31 March and their address immediately before entering care.

Information derived from these data was used in developing the Children and Young Person’s Bill clause that is concerned with the provision of accommodation and maintenance for children who are looked after by a local authority.

Social Workers: Vacancies

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the vacancy rates for child social workers were in England in each year since 2001, broken down by local authority. (229642)

Children and family social workers are employed directly by local authorities and other employers; information on vacancy rates by local authority is not collected centrally. Ofsted publishes information on overall vacancy rates for Social Services Department posts for children and families by local authority as part of the annual performance assessment. According to this measure, the number of vacant children and family Social Services Department posts fell from 12.1 per cent. in 2004-05 to 11 per cent. in 2006-07. The Local Authority Workforce Intelligence Group published vacancy rate data on children and family social workers between 2002 and 2006, showing a national reduction in vacancy rates from 12.6 per cent. in 2002 to 9.5 per cent. in 2006.

Specialised Diplomas

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the total cost of the implementation of the diploma programme. (226435)

We have spent £65.2 million on diplomas during the last three years. We are providing additional funding to support diploma delivery and capacity building over the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) years; over the next three years we are making an additional £373.8 million available to support the diploma programme.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families when he plans to publish an estimate of the number of children studying for diplomas in 2008-09; and if he will make a statement. (227725)

The Secretary of State made a statement in the House of Commons on 13 October 2008, Official Report, columns 532-33, about the number of young people who have embarked on a diploma course.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many pupils he expects to enrol on a new diploma course in September (a) 2009, (b) 2010 and (c) 2011; and if he will make a statement. (229013)

We will not know how many students will begin a diploma course in (a) 2009, (b) 2010 or (c) 2011 until after young people begin to make choices about their options. For 2009 enrolment, young people will begin to make choices next year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many schools he expects to offer one or more new diploma courses starting in September (a) 2009, (b) 2010 and (c) 2011; and if he will make a statement. (229014)

307 consortia are approved to offer one or more diplomas from September 2009. A total of 3394 institutions are involved with these consortia, including 2205 maintained secondary schools and 62 Academies. We do not yet have figures for 2010 or 2011 delivery.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what his latest estimate of the number of students who will begin a diploma course in 2009-10 is; and if he will make a statement. (229023)

We will not know how many students will begin a diploma course in 2009-10. For 2009 enrolment, young people will begin to make choices next year.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what plans he has to introduce a general diploma. (229024)

The 14-19 diploma is being introduced in four phases between 2008 and 2011. By 2011 there will be 17 lines of learning covering a wide range of employment sectors and subjects, and we will be introducing a national entitlement to the diploma from 2013. The full range of diploma qualifications will allow all young people who wish to do so to follow a course of study which combines applied and theoretical learning within a coherent overall framework built around core skills of literacy and numeracy. We do not have any plans to introduce a further, general diploma at this time. The Government have, however, committed to carrying out a full review of 14-19 qualifications, including the diploma, in 2013.

Teachers: Males

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) how many qualified full-time male secondary school teachers were working as teachers in each of the last 10 years, broken down by local authority; (228710)

(2) how many qualified full-time male primary school teachers were working as teachers in each of the last 10 years, broken down by local authority.

Information on gender of teachers is available from the Database of Teacher Records which is collected primarily for pensions administration purposes. Figures from this source are only considered sufficiently reliable to publish as percentages at the national level.

Information on the proportion of teachers by gender is available at an aggregate level for England and this has been published in table D2 of the School Workforce Statistical First Release, January 2007 (Revised) at the following web link:

http://www.dfes.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000743/index.shtml

The school work force census planned for 2010 will provide more detailed information on the school work force at local authority level.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many (a) primary schools, (b) secondary schools did not have a qualified full-time male teacher in each of the last 10 years. (228712)

Teachers: Pay

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the average starting salary of a (a) primary and (b) secondary school teacher (i) in England, (ii) in London and (iii) outside London was at the latest date for which information is available; and if he will make a statement. (229012)

The following table provides the average salary of newly qualified teachers in full-time regular service in local authority maintained nursery/primary and secondary schools in England, March 2006.

Average salary of newly qualified teachers1 in full-time regular service in local authority maintained nursery/primary and secondary schools2, March 2006, London, outer London and England

£

London

Outer London

England

Nursery/Primary

23,150

22,710

20,270

Secondary

23,900

23,520

20,540

1 Teachers included are those who attained qualified teacher status in 2005. Those gaining QTS via employment-based routes are excluded.

2 Excludes city technology colleges and academies.

Note:

Figures are rounded to the nearest £10.

Source:

Database of Teacher Records.

Teachers: Qualifications

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what plans he has to increase the number of primary teacher training (a) undergraduate and (b) postgraduate courses with a language specialism. (225836)

We have been taking a range of measures to boost the primary school teaching work force to prepare for languages becoming compulsory in primary schools in 2011. In total nearly 4,000 trainees had graduated through the primary initial teacher training course in a languages specialism by the end of the 2007/08 academic year. More trainees will be funded for this course, including a projected 900 in 2008/09.

The Training and Development Agency for Schools is also piloting this year, in partnership with 10 ITT providers, additional routes to boost the primary work force teaching languages. A projected 3,000 trainees will go through these courses in 2008/09. Of these trainees, about one third are postgraduate trainees and two thirds undergraduate trainees.

Teachers: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what schemes co-ordinated by (a) his Department and (b) local authorities that provide opportunities for experienced, recently retired teachers to act as mentors for existing subject staff in schools on a voluntary or paid basis are in operation. (228664)

This Department does not co-ordinate such schemes. It is for local authorities or schools to decide whether to pursue them based on local needs and the availability of retired teachers. No information on local schemes is held centrally.

Truancy

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families pursuant to the answer of 1 April 2008, Official Report, column 818W, on truancy, how many pupils have had a recorded unauthorised half-day absence while in Year (a) 9, (b) 10 and (c) 11 in each of the last three years. (228080)

It is not possible, given the amount of analysis required, to provide a response to this question within the time frame required by Parliament. The requested information will be placed in the House of Commons Library within 10 working days.