Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 483: debated on Wednesday 19 November 2008

Written Answers to Questions

Wednesday 19 November 2008

House of Commons Commission

Cromwell Green Entrance

To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what assessment the Commission has made of the effects of the new visitors reception and security entrance at Cromwell Green on the number of hon. Member-sponsored tours of the House. (235507)

The Cromwell Green Entrance opened as the main public entrance to Parliament on 21 April 2008.

In the six months April to September 2008, there were 65,978 visitors on Member-sponsored tours of the Palace of Westminster. In the equivalent six months in 2007, there were 67,358; and in the same period in 2006 there were 63,919.

The number of hon. Member-sponsored tours is adjusted up or down from time to time by the visitor services team in the light of experience. The most recent adjustment was a reduction in May for new bookings, when the morning maximum was reduced to ensure visitors could be securely accommodated without major overcrowding or delays.

The Commission has not conducted any assessment of the effects of the new visitor reception arrangements on the number of tours sponsored by hon. Members. The parliamentary visitor board (comprising senior officials in both Houses) is conducting a review of visitor handling, to include the operation of the new entrance. This will be taken to the relevant committees in each House in the new year.

Meat

To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what the countries of origin have been of (a) beef, (b) chicken, (c) bacon, (d) sausages, (e) pork and (f) lamb procured by the Department of facilities and its predecessor in the last three years. (237158)

The House of Commons catering service does not maintain a record of the country of origin of foods purchased and so it is not possible to confirm the provenance of meat and poultry supplies in each of the last three years.

Since October 2007, butchery suppliers have periodically been required to confirm the country of origin of meats and poultry they have supplied to the House of Commons. Based on the information provided, it is estimated that in 2007 (a) all beef supplied was UK reared except a small quantity of Halal beef sourced from the Republic of Ireland; (b) 97 per cent. of poultry was UK reared, with the balance being specific products sourced from France; (c), (d) and (e) all bacon, sausages and pork was from UK reared pigs; and (f) all lamb was UK reared.

The House authorities believe that the provenance of meat and poultry supplies was similar in previous years.

Parliamentary Tours

To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission how much income has been generated from visitors to the House during the summer openings in each of the last three years; and what the cost to the House was of operating summer opening in each year. (235508)

The summer opening programme continues to run as a cost-neutral (self-financing) operation, the strategy being to break even over a three-year period. The current three-year period, for this purpose, is 2007-09. Figures relating to the last three years are as follows:

£

Summer of:

Income

Cost

2006

412,419

597,950

2007

744,448

677,870

20081

731,082

758,909

1 2008 figures still subject to final adjustments.

These figures relate to both Houses’ shares. The Commons’ share of costs and income is 70 per cent.

To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what the average hourly pay rates are for (a) Blue Badge Guides employed during the summer openings and (b) guides employed directly by the House; and what the reasons are for any differences. (235509)

During the summer opening programme, professionally qualified Blue Badge Guides are employed to conduct tours of the Palace of Westminster. Half-day and full-day rates are calculated on the basis of nationally agreed Blue Badge rates. A qualified London Blue Badge Guide delivering a standard parliamentary tour in English would earn £38.30 per hour; in foreign languages £43.30. The cost of the Blue Badge Guides is covered by the ticket price.

For Member-sponsored tours when Parliament is sitting, the current policy is that guides are drawn primarily from serving or retired House staff and that Parliament should bear the expense of the tours. The current rate for in-house guides is £22.70 per hour.

The difference in pay reflects the higher level and formal nature of the training and qualification of Blue Badge Guides. The higher level of training includes the mechanics of guiding and detailed knowledge of London as a whole (which fits in with the requirements of summer opening visitors), as well as an independent parliamentary qualification.

Justice

Cemeteries

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what research his Department has undertaken into (a) the management of burial grounds and (b) memorial safety in the last three years. (236502)

In January 2004, a report on research into cemeteries and their management was published by the Home Office. Following the transfer of responsibility for burial law we published the results of a survey of English and Welsh burial grounds in June 2007. This can be found on the Department’s website at:

www.justice.gov.uk/whatwedo/burialgrounds050607.htm

We have not conducted research into memorial safety, but have discussed with stakeholders how best to assess and deal with the risks associated with unstable gravestones. We are now arranging for the publication of appropriate guidance.

Children: Protection

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many people convicted of causing or allowing the death of a child or vulnerable adult since 2005 received (a) a custodial sentence of less than 12 months, (b) a custodial sentence of more than 12 months but less than four years, (c) a custodial sentence of four years of more, (d) an indeterminate sentence for public protection, (e) a suspended sentence, (f) a community sentence and (g) a conditional discharge; (237309)

(2) how many (a) prosecutions and (b) convictions there have been for the offence of causing or allowing the death of a child or vulnerable adult under section 5 of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004.

The requested information is contained in the following tables.

2006 is the latest year for which annually published statistics are available.

Data for 2007 will be published on 27 November.

Number of persons proceeded against and number sentenced1 for the offence of causing or allowing the death of a child or vulnerable person by result and sentence length, all courts, England and Wales, 2005 and 2006

Result

Offence description

Number of prosecutions

Number of convictions

Conditional discharge

Community sentence

Fully suspended sentence

Immediate custody

Indeterminate sentence2

2005

Causing or allowing the death of a child or vulnerable person3

2

2006

3

2

2

Sentence length

Offence description

Less than 12 months

12 months and over and less than four years

Over four years

2005

Causing or allowing the death of a child or vulnerable person3

2006

2

1 These data are on the principal offence basis.

2 Sentences of imprisonment for public protection introduced by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 on 4 April 2005.

3 Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 (S.5)

Note:

These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system.

Source:

OMS Analytical Services.

Commonhold

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst of 5 November 2008, Official Report, column 626W, on the Land Registry, what assessment he has made of the reasons for the level of take-up of commonhold in residential dwellings since 2002. (236148)

The commonhold legislation came into force on 27 September 2004, creating a voluntary alternative to long leasehold ownership for flats and other similar premises. In view of the low take-up, my noble friend, Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, announced that the Government intended to consult with key parties to see what could be done to improve it on 26 July 2007, Official Report, column 908. As I said in my reply on 28 October 2008, Official Report, column 851W, to the hon. Member for Peterborough (Mr. Jackson), we are reviewing our plans for the publication of a consultation document in the light of other priorities and I will make a statement when a decision has been made.

Conveyancing: Internet

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what role the Valuation Office Agency is playing in the Land Registry’s development of e-conveyancing. (236079)

The Valuation Office Agency are not involved in the development of e-conveyancing but the two organisations keep in regular contact.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the latest timetable for the implementation of electronic conveyancing is; and how much his Department has allocated to support the scheme over each of the next three years. (236174)

The latest revision of Land Registry’s business case for the Electronic Conveyancing Programme estimates that the programme of work will be fully implemented in 2014-15. The Ministry of Justice gives no financial support to the programme which will be financed in full by Land Registry who estimate total costs will be in the range of £270 to £310 million.

Court of Protection

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many cases held in the Court of Protection have been reported since it became a Court of Record in October 2008; and how the public are able to obtain information on the decisions of the court. (236537)

Under the Court of Protection Rules 2007, the general position is that hearings before the court will be held in private, but the court may decide that all or part of the hearing should be held in public. The court may also authorise the publication of a text or summary of a judgment or order made by the court. The court can authorise the publication of information on its own initiative or on an application made by one of the parties to proceedings. Since 1 October 2007, the court has not held any hearings in public and nor has it authorised the publication of any information about proceedings held in private. For any future cases, where the judge authorises publication of information, details of the order or judgement will be published on the Office of Public Guardian website.

Court Orders

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many charging orders have been issued in each court area in each of the last five years. (236176)

The following table shows the numbers of charging orders made in each county court and HM courts service area in each of the last five years.

Number of charging orders by HMCS region and county court in England and Wales 2003-07

Region

Court name

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

London

Barnet

149

178

272

290

409

Bow

173

161

336

500

603

Brentford

84

120

166

230

404

Bromley

251

544

481

819

1,257

Central London

256

294

377

372

441

Clerkenwell and Shoreditch

188

175

230

270

404

Croydon

235

220

464

538

1,106

Edmonton

232

351

583

721

903

Ilford

74

130

233

253

318

Kingston-upon-Thames

85

121

109

202

284

Lambeth

190

335

512

412

479

Mayors and City

44

48

82

127

114

Romford

90

170

322

406

630

Uxbridge

436

241

294

391

810

Wandsworth

115

141

214

227

311

West London

123

88

168

200

111

Willesden

132

179

275

413

520

Woolwich

57

85

148

226

266

London Group

2,914

3,581

5,266

6,597

9,370

London total

2,914

3,581

5,266

6,597

9,370

Midlands

Buxton

18

20

19

32

45

Chesterfield

90

82

112

148

185

Derby

175

252

288

389

586

Derbyshire

283

354

419

569

816

Leicester

192

286

427

570

865

Melton Mowbray

63

50

57

89

142

Leicestershire

255

336

484

659

1,007

Boston

48

54

111

115

191

Grantham

21

22

50

47

89

Lincoln

78

94

133

170

276

Skegness

14

29

41

43

62

Lincolnshire

161

199

335

375

618

Kettering

81

74

122

158

219

Northampton

387

207

315

435

477

Wellingborough

30

56

66

109

185

Northamptonshire

498

337

503

702

881

Mansfield

81

120

188

214

357

Newark

43

54

65

73

95

Nottingham

270

364

584

760

1,048

Worksop

38

38

61

59

134

Nottinghamshire

432

576

898

1,106

1,634

Burton-on-Trent

72

61

96

112

190

Stafford

48

52

86

126

224

Stoke-on-Trent

202

280

337

448

554

Tamworth

46

51

81

124

155

Staffordshire

368

444

600

810

1,123

Nuneaton

66

130

153

200

257

Rugby

65

200

279

503

596

Stratford

18

23

48

75

63

Warwick

42

61

100

85

142

Warwickshire

191

414

580

863

1,058

Evesham

13

23

24

38

57

Hereford

23

33

39

52

84

Kidderminster

41

37

54

63

114

Ludlow

12

10

9

7

14

Oswestry

6

18

20

23

44

Redditch

104

129

176

283

1,153

Shrewsbury

40

50

77

70

110

Telford

320

363

509

617

1,071

Worcester

69

63

154

125

221

West Mercia

628

726

1,062

1,278

2,868

Birmingham CJC

728

955

1,251

1,463

2,212

Coventry

172

233

282

378

733

Dudley

108

121

209

247

342

Stourbridge

52

47

91

100

172

Walsall

143

237

340

503

610

Wolverhampton

82

178

215

294

441

West Midlands

1,285

1,771

2,388

2,985

4,510

Midland total

4,101

5,157

7,269

9,347

14,515

North East

Hartlepool

48

61

86

144

177

Teesside

141

233

432

432

947

Cleveland

189

294

518

576

1,124

Bishop Auckland

35

28

52

85

171

Consett

22

24

35

73

168

Darlington

82

67

120

224

281

Durham

55

81

150

401

482

Durham

194

200

357

783

1,102

Grimsby

92

189

197

240

404

Kingston-upon-Hull

188

302

498

621

1,227

Scunthorpe

59

64

77

119

162

Humberside

339

555

772

980

1,793

Harrogate

47

69

181

156

139

Scarborough

44

48

75

93

170

Skipton

18

176

103

95

165

York

72

102

155

180

249

North Yorkshire

181

395

514

524

723

Gateshead

32

57

237

1,286

1,740

Morpeth

45

56

119

123

295

Newcastle-upon-Tyne

333

1,125

1,420

1,818

2,394

North Shields

325

1,393

1,494

1,452

1,577

South Shields

44

41

86

116

259

Sunderland

96

104

136

193

403

Northumbria

875

2,776

3,492

4,988

6,668

Barnsley

72

77

138

177

216

Doncaster

139

247

281

319

413

Rotherham

87

114

218

241

335

Sheffield

199

275

406

651

720

South Yorkshire

497

713

1,043

1,388

1,684

Bradford

498

905

1,855

3,613

6,619

Dewsbury

40

278

634

257

235

Halifax

71

138

152

162

201

Huddersfield

161

129

214

272

407

Keighley

37

69

438

1,935

2,764

Leeds

425

647

1,001

1,206

1,568

Pontefract

54

77

187

166

207

Wakefield

73

101

152

181

264

West Yorkshire

1,359

2,344

4,633

7,792

12,265

North East total

3,634

7,277

11,329

17,031

25,359

North West

Chester

321

787

813

332

742

Crewe

42

39

102

110

142

Macclesfield

54

46

75

104

157

Northwich

17

40

63

99

162

Runcorn

32

32

90

88

112

Warrington

51

82

118

168

324

Cheshire

517

1,026

1,261

901

1,639

Barrow-in-Furness

31

31

46

53

89

Carlisle

32

46

53

92

111

Kendal

11

6

14

18

27

Penrith

16

6

15

14

19

Whitehaven

17

34

30

49

86

Cumbria

107

123

158

226

332

Altrincham

172

162

126

80

174

Bolton

98

135

160

192

375

Bury

86

83

127

191

274

Leigh

28

31

42

73

113

Manchester

404

408

570

694

1,429

Oldham

151

151

205

324

516

Salford

84

95

170

201

438

Stockport

103

112

167

209

365

Tameside

84

84

161

188

269

Wigan

104

127

268

441

554

Greater Manchester

1,314

1,388

1,996

2,593

4,507

Accrington

23

35

51

70

108

Blackburn

58

90

133

158

216

Blackpool

117

120

234

376

445

Burnley

41

59

62

104

139

Chorley

18

30

33

59

82

Lancaster

36

53

57

94

104

Nelson

26

28

57

45

60

Preston

108

112

182

235

286

Rawtenstall

24

24

24

37

98

Lancashire

451

551

833

1,178

1,538

Birkenhead

104

126

154

249

334

Liverpool

289

381

560

639

1,043

Southport

46

46

72

99

145

St. Helens

66

82

194

230

397

Merseyside

505

635

980

1,217

1,919

North West total

2,894

3,723

5,228

6,115

9,935

South East

Bedford

45

69

105

186

240

Luton

88

102

238

324

400

Bedfordshire

133

171

343

510

640

Cambridge

62

90

154

177

190

Huntingdon

32

37

47

69

115

Peterborough

124

123

200

273

293

Cambridgeshire

218

250

401

519

598

Basildon

101

139

219

342

526

Chelmsford

71

95

165

222

285

Colchester

122

126

221

315

425

Harlow

70

67

114

133

225

Southend-on-Sea

177

259

424

686

980

Essex

541

686

1,143

1,698

2,441

Hertford

44

89

63

103

198

Hitchin

77

90

106

137

222

St. Albans

41

45

75

128

564

Watford

171

234

375

440

652

Hertfordshire

333

458

619

808

1,636

Ashford

43

64

124

152

233

Canterbury

80

103

157

196

272

Dartford

89

112

243

316

635

Gravesend

16

40

51

69

0

Maidstone

63

62

112

168

205

Medway

102

117

208

314

418

Thanet

20

59

55

103

157

Tunbridge Wells

44

61

120

172

191

Kent

457

618

1,070

1,490

2,111

King's Lynn

51

49

105

111

208

Norwich

136

143

262

259

399

Norfolk

187

192

367

370

607

Bury St. Edmunds

46

53

68

121

217

Ipswich

105

104

170

182

269

Lowestoft

41

59

98

147

157

Suffolk

192

216

336

450

643

Epsom

82

119

527

515

340

Guildford

61

73

88

189

775

Reigate

154

178

220

355

369

Staines

75

81

121

195

262

Surrey

372

451

956

1,254

1,746

Brighton

583

434

654

1,378

2,517

Chichester

86

73

134

200

282

Eastbourne

30

52

89

120

191

Hastings

46

63

108

118

199

Haywards Heath

26

31

36

79

106

Horsham

122

201

166

173

322

Lewes

22

20

48

53

85

Worthing

77

73

131

439

363

Sussex

992

947

1,366

2,560

4,065

Aylesbury

48

61

74

161

183

Banbury

75

136

232

532

698

High Wycombe

44

52

59

116

136

Milton Keynes

101

177

245

435

655

Newbury

36

43

70

54

91

Oxford

115

181

368

507

766

Reading

171

272

310

321

497

Slough

86

124

213

268

492

Thames Valley

676

1,046

1,571

2,394

3,518

South East total

4,101

5,035

8,172

12,053

18,005

South West

Bath

34

31

53

62

77

Bristol

365

494

635

992

1,478

Taunton

48

55

89

125

148

Weston-super-Mare

55

51

70

121

123

Yeovil

153

91

114

193

188

Avon and Somerset

655

722

961

1,493

2,014

Barnstaple

76

70

52

81

100

Bodmin

42

52

54

77

110

Exeter

369

331

809

1,305

834

Penzance

27

25

52

79

85

Plymouth

175

155

171

266

352

Torquay

121

82

104

125

200

Truro

54

117

155

132

143

Devon and Cornwall

864

832

1,397

2,065

1,824

Bournemouth

139

382

298

311

465

Poole

124

177

233

318

345

Weymouth

40

35

48

58

57

Dorset

303

594

579

687

867

Cheltenham

70

126

110

152

148

Gloucester

106

139

183

253

339

Gloucestershire

176

265

293

405

487

Aldershot

82

108

141

187

276

Basingstoke

51

67

106

119

201

Newport (IoW)

27

21

57

88

95

Portsmouth

126

150

234

361

517

Southampton

235

221

512

757

822

Winchester

28

32

23

34

34

Hampshire and Isle of Wight

549

599

1,073

1,546

1,945

Salisbury

18

19

37

46

71

Swindon

67

80

165

341

567

Trowbridge

49

62

129

154

211

Wiltshire

134

161

331

541

849

South West total

2,681

3,173

4,634

6,737

7,986

Wales

Aberystwyth

6

13

14

17

36

Brecknock

6

5

8

14

32

Carmarthen

32

21

46

65

104

Haverfordwest

24

11

30

57

70

Llanelli

42

29

38

51

126

Welshpool

7

16

19

24

29

Dyfed-Powys

117

95

155

228

397

Blackwood

2,015

229

215

211

276

Newport (Gwent)

61

117

210

364

672

Pontypool

6

46

69

81

88

Gwent

2,082

392

494

656

1,036

Caernarfon

20

34

23

51

57

Conwy and Colwyn

15

11

33

56

67

Llangefni

14

16

21

21

60

Mold

15

13

41

36

86

Rhyl

35

46

75

95

176

Wrexham

26

58

71

110

312

North Wales

125

178

264

369

758

Aberdare

8

24

22

45

105

Bridgend

45

73

101

166

213

Cardiff

2,312

4,274

5,810

7,176

8,428

Merthyr Tydfil

14

26

36

59

93

Neath

40

58

97

110

182

Pontypridd

62

68

130

145

270

Swansea

87

101

211

256

374

South Wales

2,568

4,624

6,407

7,957

9,665

Wales Total

4,892

5,289

7,320

9,210

11,856

England and Wales total

25,217

33,235

49,218

67,090

97,026

Source:

HMCS CaseMan system

Marriage

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the answer of 4 November 2008, Official Report, columns 315-17W, on marriage, (1) how many orders under section 55 of the Family Law Act 1986 in relation to the validity of marriages were (a) granted and (b) denied in each of the last five years; (235877)

(2) how many orders for judicial separation under section 55 of the Family Law Act 1986 were (a) granted and (b) denied in each of the last five years.

The courts do not record how many applications under section 55 of the Family Law Act 1986 are received, nor do they record the outcome of these cases. Anecdotal evidence from courts suggests that there are very few.

There are no provisions for judicial separation under the Family Law Act 1986. The provisions for judicial separation can be found within the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. There were 3,388 applications made for judicial separation during the five-year period 2003-07. Records show that for the same five-year period 1,953 decrees of judicial separation were pronounced (the following table sets out the number of cases per year). The courts do not keep records of the number of applications which were denied. For comparison 778,575 applications for divorce were received for the same period.

Not all applications for judicial separation result in a final order as many parties choose not to pursue the case. This is not always because the parties have reconciled. The law prohibits divorce during the first year of marriage and some applications for judicial separation issued during the first year of marriage are withdrawn on the first anniversary of the marriage, before a decree is granted, and a petition for divorce then is issued.

Family courts—summary statistics on matrimonial proceedings, 2003-07

Number of cases

Judicial separation

Petition filed

Decrees granted

2003

826

467

2004

745

419

2005

700

385

2006

615

353

2007

502

329

Source:

HMCS FamilyMan system.

Published in Judicial and Court Statistics 2007, September 2008.

Pleural Plaques

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice when he expects to publish the Government’s response to the consultation paper on pleural plaques; and if he will make a statement. (236535)

The Government’s consultation on pleural plaques closed on 1 October, and the responses are currently being analysed. We will seek to publish a response paper outlining the way forward as soon as possible.

Prison Service: Disciplinary Proceedings

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many prison officers were (a) suspended and (b) dismissed in each year since 1997. (235956)

Information about the numbers of public sector Prison Service employees of any grade suspended from duty in each year since 1997 is not held centrally, and could be provided only at disproportionate cost by contacting 138 establishments across England and Wales.

Information about prison officer suspensions in the contracted prison estate 20031 to 31 October 2008 are set out in the following table.

1 The Office for National Commissioning (formerly Office for Contracted Prisons) was not in operation before 2003. Prison officer includes: prison custody officer and senior officer for the contracted estate.

Suspensions

2003

15

2004

30

2005

34

2006

48

2007

51

2008

75

Prison officer dismissals in the public sector Prison Service and the contracted prison estate 19981 to 31 October 2008 set out in the following table.

1 No dismissals data are available for 1997 as the public sector Prison Service personnel recording system was not established until 1998.

Dismissals

1998

21

1999

29

2000

72

2001

109

2002

141

2003

229

2004

200

2005

237

2006

225

2007

266

2008

176

The information includes dismissals for: inefficiency, conduct and performance reasons. Prison officer includes: prison officer, senior officer, and principal officer for the public sector prisons; and prison custody officer and senior officer for the contracted estate.

The number of dismissals increased significantly in 2003 due to a greater number of medical inefficiency dismissals as a result of more robust management of sickness absence in the public sector Prison Service from that time. In addition to this, the Office for National Commissioning (formerly Office for Contracted Prisons) began operating in 2003 and therefore data for contracted prisons are included from this date.

Prisoners: Drugs

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many (a) male and (b) female prisoners were treated for drug addiction in each year since 1997. (235952)

Information about drug treatment programmes in prison was not collated centrally until 2001-02. The following table shows details from that year onwards.

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Drug treatment programmes

Starts male

4,362

3,978

4,188

7,130

10,166

10,383

10,514

Starts female1

329

408

515

479

577

767

805

Total

4,691

4,386

4,703

7,609

10,743

11,150

11,319

CARATs

SMTAs2 male

36,031

49,576

48,876

53,262

59,118

58,386

58,828

SMTAs female1

3,307

4,320

5,249

5,763

6,893

7,287

6,995

Total

39,338

51,896

54,125

59,025

66,011

65,673

65,823

Clinical treatment3

Male4

n/a

n/a

n/a

45,311

n/a

n/a

n/a

Female

n/a

n/a

n/a

8,592

n/a

n/a

n/a

Total

41,765

50,701

57,891

53,903

53,773

51,520

58,809

1 The system for recording these figures is unable to distinguish gender other than by the type of establishment where the information is recorded. Some establishments may have been subject to re-role mid-year and some interventions may have been delivered on mixed sites. Therefore the gender split is a good approximation but will be subject to some inaccuracies.

2 Substance Misuse Triage Assessments.

3 Detoxification or maintenance prescriptions.

4 2004-05 is the only year that complete central data were collected on the number of female prisoners undergoing clinical treatment. This was carried out by survey.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many (a) male and (b) female prisoners tested positive for drugs in each year since 1997. (235958)

Prisoners are subject to mandatory, voluntary and clinical drug tests. The number of positive tests for drugs under the mandatory drug testing programme is given in the following table. Voluntary and clinical drug test results are not held centrally and could be obtained by surveying 138 establishments, which would only be at disproportionate cost.

All data in this answer have been drawn from an administrative data system. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. The data are not subject to audit.

(a) Number of male prisoners testing positive

(b) Number of female prisoners testing positive

1997-98

19,637

596

1998-99

18,420

600

1999-2000

17,098

780

2000-01

15,990

812

2001-02

13,689

681

2002-03

12,304

578

2003-04

13,959

685

2004-05

14,274

813

2005-06

13,819

891

2006-07

12,342

930

2007-08

13,291

687

Prisons: Childbirth

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many women have given birth while serving a prison sentence in England in each of the last five years. (235686)

The numbers of prisoners who have given birth while serving their custodial sentence since April 2005, when the Prison Service began collecting figures centrally, are as follows:

Number

April 2008-October 2008

56

April 2007-March 2008

102

April 2006-March 2007

99

April 2005-March 2006

106

The Government are seeking to encourage greater use of community sentences for women offenders where possible. Where a custodial sentence has been given, specific provision is made for those women who are pregnant or have babies with them in prison.

Prisons: Death

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many (a) suicides, (b) deaths from natural causes and (c) suspicious deaths there were in prisons in each year since 1997. (235955)

The National Offender Management Service’s system for classifying deaths in prison custody consists of four categories indicating the apparent cause of death. These are ‘self-inflicted’, ‘natural causes’, ‘homicide’ and ‘other non-natural’. There is no specific category of ‘suspicious deaths’. The deaths in prison custody since 1997 to 13 November 2007 have been classified as follows:

Homicide

Natural causes

Other non-natural

Self-inflicted

Total

1997

2

48

1

68

119

1998

4

46

1

83

134

1999

0

58

0

91

149

2000

3

62

1

81

147

2001

0

68

1

73

142

2002

0

66

3

95

164

2003

1

86

2

94

183

2004

2

102

9

95

208

2005

3

88

5

78

174

2006

0

83

3

67

153

2007

2

90

0

92

184

2008 (year to date)

3

80

2

51

136

There is also one further death in 2008 which remains unclassified. As inquests can take several years to be completed, all classifications are considered as provisional. Historical numbers can change slightly when new information is received.

Small Claims: Internet

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many small claims for matters relating to the trade of counterfeit goods over the internet were reported in 2007. (235830)

There were approximately 1.2 million small claims issued in the county courts of England and Wales in 2007. However, figures relating solely to small claims about the trade of counterfeit goods over the internet are not held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Treasury

Bank Services

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what steps are being taken to prevent future instances of home state deposit guarantee schemes being unable to cover the savings of UK depositors. (231016)

The European Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (94/19/EC) sets the minimum level of compensation to retail depositors in credit institutions in the event of the failure of a deposit taker. The directive is in the course of being updated to increase the minimum level of coverage, reduce the payout delay and introduce 100 per cent. coverage of eligible deposits.

Banking Supervision

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the extent and scope of his responsibilities and accountability to Parliament in relation to the activity of the arms-length bodies managing the stakes taken by the Government in (a) the Royal Bank of Scotland, (b) Halifax/Bank of Scotland, (c) Lloyds TSB Bank and (d) Northern Rock; what guidance has been offered in each case in responding to correspondence from hon. Members; and on what matters he will (i) answer questions and (ii) refer such questions to the executive bodies of each institution. (228296)

As part of the recapitalisation scheme announced on 8 October, it is intended that new non-executive directors will be appointed to the boards of each of RBS and the merged Lloyds TSB/HBOS. These will be independent non-executive directors appointed by the board of each bank. UK Financial Investments, the company which will manage the Treasury's shareholding, will work with those boards to ensure the individuals have appropriate commercial experience. The purpose behind their appointment is to strengthen the board of each bank and to provide independent oversight in respect of governance and other matters in the interests of all the shareholders of each bank.

Annual reports on UKFI's performance will be laid before Parliament, and the chair and chief executive will make themselves available for scrutiny by the relevant parliamentary committees.

Northern Rock (in common with all institutions in which UKFI has a stake) will continue to have its own independent board and management team, determining its own strategy.

Christmas

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much (a) his Department and (b) its agencies have spent on Christmas (a) cards, (b) parties and (c) decorations in the last 12 months. (237495)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 21 April 2008, Official Report, columns 1668-69W.

Departmental Telephone Services

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what guidance his Department has issued to staff responsible for handling calls from the public in respect of (a) accuracy of responses, (b) the cost to the caller, (c) the duration of calls, (d) customer satisfaction, (e) access to accurate records, (f) confidentiality, (g) access to staff capable of making executive decisions and (h) fulfilling undertakings to call a customer back; and what targets have been set for (i) each of the above categories and (ii) any other performance measures. (237088)

All Treasury officials are expected to comply with the provisions of the Civil Service Code and to deal with members of the public and their affairs fairly, efficiently, promptly, effectively and sensitively.

Hotels

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much his Department spent on hotel bills in 2007-08. (237148)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 27 October 2008, Official Report, column 780W to the hon. Member for Upper Bann (David Simpson).

Housing: Valuation

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) pursuant to the Answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) of 18 June 2008, Official Report, column 988W, on housing: valuation, if he will place in the Library a copy of the maps and boundaries of each locality within the billing authority of Bromley. (235868)

(2) pursuant to the Answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) of 22 July 2008, Official Report, column 1393W, on housing: valuation, for what reason the numerical co-efficient values used by the Valuation Office Agency are commercially confidential.

Valuation Office Agency (VOA) provides valuation services in competition with other providers. Publication of this information would weaken the competitive position of VOA.

Kaupthing Singer and Friedland

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what consideration he gave to the partial or complete taking into public ownership of the UK operations of Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander. (230732)

On 8 October acting on the advice of the bank and FSA, the Chancellor acted to protect the retail depositors in Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander, a UK-based banking subsidiary of Kaupthing Bank.

The Treasury used the Banking (Special Provisions) Act 2008 to ensure a resolution that preserves financial stability and provides protection and continuity of business for depositors. KSF's Kaupthing Edge deposit business was transferred to ING Direct, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ING Group, which operates through its branch in the UK. The remainder of Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander business was put into administration.

Any retail depositors eligible to claim under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme whose business has not been transferred to ING Direct will be paid out in full through the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

This was the right course of action to protect savers, ensure financial stability, and safeguard the interests of the taxpayer.

Members: Correspondence

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he plans to reply to the letter of 19 September 2008 from the hon. Member for Congleton on behalf of her constituent Mr. Robert Arian. (236241)

NHS: Consultants

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer with reference to the recent analysis of consultants' NHS and private incomes funded by the Department of Health, on what occasions in the last five years access to (a) anonymised, (b) pseudo-anonymised and (c) non-anonymised data from tax returns has been granted to (i) non-HM Revenue and Customs personnel and (ii) non-Civil Service personnel; and how many tax returns have been used in this way. (231976)

In the last five years, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has conducted sample surveys into consultants' earnings on behalf of Department of Health for the tax years 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05, using data derived from HMRC records. HMRC has not released any data from this work to non-HM Revenue and Customs personnel in either pseudo-anonymised or non-anonymised form. Only anonymised outputs were released to Department of Health or to The NHS Information Centre for health and social care. The number of tax records used in each study is as follows:

Income tax year

Count of tax records

2001-02

1,554

2002-03

21,864

2003-04

24,407

2004-05

22,814

In addition, at the request of Department of Health for 2003-04 only, HMRC created an anonymised statistical dataset relating to consultants' earnings. It contained only the data items for 24,407 cases that were necessary to enable an academic researcher acting on behalf of Department of Health to undertake statistical analysis. The researcher was only allowed supervised access to this one anonymised, statistical dataset on HMRC premises, in a stand alone, secure environment.

Performance Appraisal

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many staff in his Department did not achieve an acceptable assessment grade in their annual report in the latest reporting year for which figures are available. (235210)

During the reporting year 2007-08:

41 (6 per cent.) staff below SCS received a tranche 3 appraisal marking described as

“Some significant shortcomings over the performance year that need to be addressed or are being addressed, expected overall to be around 5 to 10% of people across the Treasury.”

5 (7 per cent.) staff in the SCS received a group 4 marking described as

“Bottom 5-10% of performers—do not receive a bonus and have action taken to address under performance or ongoing poor performance, including the drawing up of a Performance Improvement Plan.”

Public Sector: Procurement

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will incorporate British Standards Institution Standard BS ISO 15686-5 on Standardized Method of Life Cycle Costing for Construction Procurement into public sector procurement of new buildings. (236828)

Government welcome the development of the Standardized Method of Life Cycle Costing for Construction Procurement. Officials from both the Office of Government Commerce and Defence Estates have also been involved with BSI and others in the development of this work.

Government policy, set out in the HM Treasury Green Book: “Appraisals and Evaluation in Central Government” already requires investment decisions to be made on the basis of value for money over the whole-life of the asset or service.

As the construction industry moves to adopt the standardised approach then that will help all sectors, including Government, to ensure that decision-making is appropriately informed.

Tax Credit: Crosby

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the number of children in Crosby constituency who have been taken out of poverty by tax credits. (236681)

Tax credits play a key role in making work pay and reducing poverty, and have helped to lift 600,000 children out of relative poverty since 1998-99.

Child poverty statistics are not available on a constituency basis, however, estimates of the number of recipient families with tax credits, including the number of children in these families, by constituency, as at 5 April 2008, are available in the HMRC snapshot publication “Child and Working Tax Credits Statistics. Geographical Analyses. April 2008”. This is available on the HMRC website at:

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/stats/personal-tax-credits/cwtc-geog-stats.htm

This shows that 9,700 children in Crosby were benefiting from tax credits in April 2008, though it is not known how many of these have been lifted above the poverty line as a result.

UK Financial Investments

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what arrangements he has made for the accountability to Parliament of his Department’s arms-length company, UK Financial Investments Limited (UKFI); from what budget UKFI will be funded; and what salary will be paid to (a) the chairperson, (b) the chief executive and (c) each of the non-executive board members. (234604)

Annual reports on UKFI’s performance will be laid before Parliament and the chair and chief executive will make themselves available for scrutiny by the relevant parliamentary committees.

UKFI will be funded by HM Treasury which will in due course determine the remuneration packages of the chair, chief executive and non-executive board members.

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will appoint non-executive directors from (a) banking trades’ unions, (b) relevant non-governmental organisations and (c) elected politicians as non-executive directors to the board of UK Financial Investments Ltd. (236231)

The Chancellor’s letter of 3 November 2008 to the Chairman of the Treasury Committee announced the appointment of Sir Philip Hampton as Chair of UK Financial Investments Ltd (UKFI). Three further non-executive directors will be recruited to the Board of UKFI on the basis of appropriate commercial skill and experience through a process of fair and open competition.

Valuation Office: Information and Communications Technology

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will place in the Library a copy of the Valuation Office Agency’s (a) Information Asset Register and (b) E-BAR post-implementation review. (235076)

The VOA does not currently hold an Information Asset Register. We are currently reviewing this position and associated use of the Government Information Asset Register (as held by Office of Public Sector Information).

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to him on 1 September 2008, Official Report, column 1429W. The post-implementation review is already in the Library.

Written Questions: Government Responses

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he plans to answer Question 228544, on pension funds, tabled by the hon. Member for North East Hertfordshire on 15 October 2008. (236729)

Scotland

Departmental Information Officers

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many full-time equivalent press officers (a) work for and (b) provide assistance to his Department. (236644)

The Scotland Office employs two full-time press officers, a Chief Press Officer based in Edinburgh and a Press Officer based in London.

Departmental Internet

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many (a) page hits and (b) visitors his departmental website received in 2007-08. (236645)

Between March 2007 and April 2008, the Scotland Office website received 350,006 page hits and 94,714 visitors.

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what the cost of maintaining his departmental website was in 2007-08; and what it is expected to be in 2008-09. (236646)

Between March 2007 and April 2008, the cost of hosting the Scotland Office website was £550 and the cost of routine maintenance was £2,440. In the period 2008-09, the hosting cost is expected to be £1,700. This is due to the adoption of a new hosting contract that will enable the content management of the website to be brought in-house. The routine maintenance costs for 2008-09 are therefore expected to be minimal.

Departmental NDPBs

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what the remit is of each non-departmental public body sponsored by his Department; and what budget each has been set for (a) 2008-09, (b) 2009-10 and (c) 2010-11. (236931)

The Scotland Office sponsors the Boundary Commission for Scotland, a small advisory non-departmental public body responsible for reviews of:

constituencies and regions for the Scottish Parliament;

constituencies in Scotland for the Westminster Parliament.

The Commission's budget for 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 is set out in the Scotland Office 2008 annual report which is available on the Scotland Office website.

Further information about the Commission can be found on its website:

www.bcomm-scotland.gov.uk

Dungavel House Immigration Removal Centre: Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland when he plans to make an announcement on the details of an alternative to detention for children at Dungavel. (235996)

On Thursday 23 October my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State announced that the UK Border Agency, working with the Scottish Government, Glasgow City Council the Scottish Refugee Council and other partners, is going ahead with an alternatives to detention pilot based in Glasgow. The pilot is due to commence in early 2009 and run for an initial 18-month period, although this will kept under review when the pilot commences.

Women and Equality

Departmental Official Hospitality

To ask the Minister for Women and Equality how many official receptions have been hosted by the Government Equalities Office since its creation; what the cost was of each reception; and who attended each reception. (235474)

Since its creation on 12 October 2007, the Government Equalities Office has hosted nine official receptions.

I refer the right hon. Member to a previous response on 10 March 2008, Official Report, column 4W, which lists details up to and including February 2008. Details of the four receptions since February are listed as follows:

Reception

Date

Cost (£)

Women in Business

12 May 2008

3,972

BAME Councillor’s Taskforce

19 May 2008

3,300

Launch of a Framework for a Fairer Future (The Equality Bill)

25 June 2008

3,892

Women in Public Appointments

14 July 2008

5,396

Black History Month

3 November 2008

8,731

Total

25,291

All figures are inclusive of VAT.

Lists of those attending these receptions will be placed in the Commons Library. This will be subject to data protection requirements.

Wales

Departmental Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how much his Department spent on hotel bills in 2007-08. (237143)

My Department is split over two sites with a requirement that some staff have to attend meetings in both London and Cardiff as well as supporting Ministers visiting different parts of Wales. For the year 2007-08, £26,879 was spent on hotels.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Agriculture: Loans

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent representations he has received on banks lending to farmers. (237199)

[holding answer 18 November 2008]: DEFRA has not received any recent formal representations about banks lending to farmers. The issue has, on occasion, been informally raised by farming representatives at meetings, but I am not aware of any current concerns and my officials will remain in touch with the sector should any problems arise.

Agriculture: Subsidies

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many holdings claimed payments under the single payment scheme not exceeding 250 euros or equivalent in the last year for which figures are available. (230704)

The Rural Payments Agency is the accredited paying agency for the common agricultural policy within England and, as such, does not hold equivalent information for single payment scheme (SPS) claimants in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The latest information available for English SPS claimants in 2007 shows that there were 7,475 claims with a value less than €250.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many and what value of payments were made under the single payment scheme in each of the last three years, broken down by claims (a) not exceeding £1, (b) between £1 and £100, (c) between £100 and £1,000, (d) between £1,000 and £10,000, (e) between £10,000 and £50,000, (f) between £50,000 and £100,000, (g) between £100,000 and £250,000, (h) between £250,000 and £500,000, (i) between £500,000 and £1,000,000, (j) between £1,000,000 and £2,000,000 and (k) more than £2,000,000. (230705)

The Rural Payments Agency is the accredited paying agency for the common agricultural policy within England and, as such, does not hold information for single payment scheme (SPS) claimants in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.

The following table shows the payments, made by value groups, in England in 2005, 2006 and 2007.

200520062007

Value group

Number

£

Number

£

Number

£

0 to 0.99p

69

5.21

8

0.09

5

0.79

£1 to £99.99

18,112

898,534.50

9,186

528,220.46

3,537

231,971.23

£100 to £999.99

27,852

10,562,649.70

26,247

10,664,320.98

25,442

11,165,845.04

£1,000 to £9,999.99

32,398

144,129,777.75

33,327

144,190,623.10

37,465

157,388,954.71

£10,000 to £49,999.99

31,614

735,783,916.99

31,562

733,872,075.35

31,266

713,844,182.21

£50,000 to £99,999.99

5,352

364,965,724.21

5,063

343,586,384.35

4,722

320,080,438.15

£100,000 to £249,999.99

1,668

232,135,957.58

1,470

203,294,728.89

1,380

193,459,905.15

£250,000 to £499,999.99

148

48,156,413.15

125

41,565,049.93

103

34,109,130.32

£500,000 to £999,999.99

20

12,501,319.57

16

10,635,422.49

16

10,581,927.45

£1,000,000 to £1,999,999.99

6

7,063,245.99

5

5,554,856.48

4

4,709,381.74

More than £2,000,000

1

2,173,791.69

1

2,412,054.35

1

2,191,054.26

Total

117,240

1,558,371,336.34

107,010

1,496,303,736.48

103,941

1,447,762,791.05

Departmental Buildings

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Fareham (Mr. Hoban) of 27 October 2008, Official Report, column 610W, on departmental buildings, whether his Department is paying empty property business rates in relation to 1A Page Street. (236041)

The Department having claimed the empty property rates relief permitted by legislation, is now paying empty property business rates in respect of this vacant building.

Domestic Waste: Waste Disposal

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) of 6 November 2008, Official Report, columns 654-56W, on domestic waste, what advice has been given to the local authorities by (a) his Department and (b) the Waste and Resources Action Programme on how to meet the targets to reduce residual household waste. (236035)

In order to reduce the amount of residual household waste for disposal, local authorities can promote a range of sustainable activities. These include waste prevention, encouraging re-use, home composting and increasing recycling. Local authorities are actively promoting all these options. WRAP offers a wide range of guidance and practical support to local authorities on these issues.

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) of 4 November 2008, Official Report, column 401W, on the Waste and Resources Action Programme, whether the awareness programme included discussions of issues relating to (a) alternative weekly collection, (b) household waste collection and (c) charging for the collection of household waste. (236040)

The awareness programme involved meetings at which WRAP staff updated individual political stakeholders on the full range of WRAP’s activities. This included the four priorities in WRAP’s current business plan: food waste, packaging waste, quality of materials and providing advice to local authorities on devising effective collection schemes.

Floods: Essex

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent steps have been taken to strengthen flood protection measures in Essex. (235799)

In the last year, the Environment Agency has invested approximately £22.7 million in Essex. This includes work on defence improvements, maintenance and the construction of new schemes. The Environment Agency has invested in strategic plans and the detailed appraisal of schemes to be constructed in future years. Improvements have been made to the accuracy and availability of flood warnings and the Essex multi-agency flood plan has been improved.

Inspections

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much the Animal Health Executive Agency has spent on training its inspectors in each of the last five years, broken down by training programme. (237197)

[holding answer 18 November 2008]: Animal Health (AH) became an Executive Agency of DEFRA on 1 April 2005 and can only report full year spend for 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. AH do not hold figures of training by programme; this information could be obtained only at disproportionate cost. The overall spend figures are shown in the following table:

£

2005-06

146,699

2006-07

631,909

2007-08

978,113

Note:

AH was called the 'State Veterinary Service' upon its inception on 1 April 2005 and was joined by the Dairy Hygiene Inspectorate, the Egg Marketing Inspectorate and the Wildlife Licensing and Registration Service to together become ‘Animal Health' on 1 April 2007.

Source:

These data were sourced from the Corporate Finance and Human Resources teams, both

located in Animal Health Corporate Centre at Worcester.

Public Relations: Forestry Commission

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much the Forestry Commission has spent on (a) external public affairs and (b) public relations in each of the last five years. (236523)

The Forestry Commission in England engages in a wide range of external communications activities including the promotion of forestry policy and the benefits of sustainable woodland management. It also promotes the public forest estate both as a sustainably managed asset and a major resource for public access and recreation. Promotion and communication of these activities is delivered though a wide range of channels including the media, publications, events, marketing of visitor attractions and on the internet. Indicative costs for this work over the last five years are:

£000

2003-04

529

2004-05

640

2005-06

847

2006-07

958

2007-08

980

Recycling

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if the Environment Agency will take steps to increase the transparency of the final destination of materials collected for recycling once the materials are transferred from local authorities to waste disposal companies. (235138)

The Environment Agency is in the process of issuing guidance to Waste Disposal Authorities (WDA) clarifying that they should report details of the final destination of the waste (i.e. the name and address of the final destination facility in the UK) in their existing quarterly Waste Data Flow (WDF) return. A number of WDAs are already providing comprehensive final destination details.

Waste Disposal: Fees and Charges

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickle) of 4 November 2008, Official Report, column 401W, on waste disposal: council tax, whether the charges levied through waste incentive pilot schemes will be classified as a form of taxation for the purposes of the national statistics. (235851)

The Office for National Statistics has responsibility for determining the classification of income for the purposes of national accounts.

Waste Management

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what guidance his Department has issued on the co-mingling of commercial and domestic waste at the point of collection. (235929)

Water: Meters

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what modelling his Department has done on the impact of water metering on low income groups; and if he will make a statement; (235659)

(2) what his Department’s policy is on the future of water metering; and if he will make a statement.

The Government’s water strategy for England “Future Water” was published in February 2008. In that report, an independent review was announced to advise on metering and charging. The review, led by Anna Walker, is currently under way and a call for evidence was issued on 14 November.

Severn Barrage: Nature Conservation

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the effects a Severn Barrage would have in terms of identifying compensatory habitats under the EU Habitats Directive. (235338)

I have been asked to reply.

A high level review of the feasibility of a number of possible compensation and mitigation measures has been undertaken in this first phase of the feasibility study. This review will be published as part of a public consultation early in the new year, subject to an internal review of the feasibility study.

Should the decision be taken to go ahead with the second phase, then more work is anticipated within the study next year on the scope to mitigate environmental impacts through the construction and operation of tidal power scheme options, and on compensatory measures for impacts that cannot be mitigated.

Northern Ireland

Terrorist Activity

3. To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what recent assessment he has made of levels of terrorist activity in Northern Ireland. (235740)

The 20th IMC report confirms that Dissident Republicans remain a serious and continuing threat, intent on killing police officers. The report also makes clear, that while some loyalists want to make progress, this is disappointingly slow, particularly with regard to Decommissioning.

Departmental Policy Priorities

6. To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what his Department’s policy priorities are for 2008-09; and if he will make a statement. (235744)

My Department’s main objective is to support devolved Government in Northern Ireland and to devolve policing and justice when requested to do so by the Assembly. The Northern Ireland Office’s Strategic Objectives for the CSR2007 period are published on the NIO website.

Saville Inquiry

7. To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what discussions the Government has had with Lord Saville or his inquiry staff on the Bloody Sunday report and the time taken to finalise it. (235745)

Northern Ireland Office officials regularly meet inquiry staff to discuss corporate governance issues, including financial forecasts. Following news of the recent delay, senior NIO officials met the Inquiry Secretary to discuss urgent measures to control future costs.

Policing and Justice

8. To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what recent representations he has received on the devolution of policing and justice matters to the Northern Ireland Assembly. (235746)

Following yesterday’s historic agreement between First and Deputy First Minister on the devolution of policing and justice the Government continue to engage with political parties to help complete devolution in Northern Ireland.

12. To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what progress has been made on the devolution of policing and criminal justice matters to the Northern Ireland Assembly. (235752)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to my hon. Friend the Member for North-West Leicestershire (David Taylor).

9. To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what progress has been made on the devolution of policing to the Northern Ireland Assembly. (235748)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to my hon. Friend the Member for North-West Leicestershire (David Taylor).

Republican Paramilitary Activity

10. To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what assessment he has made of the conclusions of the recent report by the Independent Monitoring Commission on levels of republican paramilitary activity. (235750)

The 20th IMC report underlines the significant progress that Northern Ireland has made away from conflict and towards a more normal society. While they have no public support, the threat from dissident republicans is high and they remain determined to kill or injure police officers.

Northern Ireland Executive

11. To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what assessment he has made of the effect on the operation of the planning system in Northern Ireland of the fact that the Northern Ireland Executive have not met recently. (235751)

The operation of the planning system is a devolved matter in Northern Ireland. I am sure that, when it meets, the Executive will give a high priority to issues that have an impact on economic and social development in Northern Ireland.

Prisoners

To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what the total prison population in Northern Ireland is. (235791)

Transport

Aviation: Crew

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of drug and alcohol testing relating to persons in charge of an aeroplane; and if he will make a statement. (234912)

The Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003 introduced alcohol limits for persons performing specified aviation functions, including acting as a pilot of an aircraft. The prescribed limit for pilots is 20 milligrammes of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood. In addition the Act empowers the police to test persons performing aviation functions if they have reasonable suspicion that they are over the alcohol limit or are otherwise impaired by drink or drugs.

Since the introduction of this Bill a number of pilots have been convicted of exceeding the prescribed limit for alcohol. However, there is no evidence of widespread alcohol or drugs abuse by pilots. Nor have there been any accidents or incidents involving UK airlines that have been found to have resulted from alcohol or drugs use by pilots.

Aviation: EU Action

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what plans there are for harmonising type approval of aircraft across the European Union; and if he will make a statement; (237003)

(2) what the cost to the applicant to obtain type approval from the Civil Aviation Authority for a new model of aircraft for use in the UK was for each of the last 10 such approved applications; and how long the application process took to complete in each case.

Under EC Regulation 216/2008 the type certification of the majority of aircraft manufactured or registered in EU member states is the responsibility of the European Aviation Safety Agency. This has been the position since 2003 when the agency came into being. However, certain aircraft types listed in annex II to the regulation are not covered by the agency’s remit. The aviation authority of the member state in which any such aircraft is registered remains responsible for its type certification or, in the case of aircraft not eligible for a type certificate, the approval of a permit to fly. At this time there are no plans for harmonising for the certification requirements for these aircraft.

The Department for Transport does not hold detailed information relating to the time taken by the CAA to process each application for a type certificate or a type approval for permits to fly nor the charges made. Such information will be available from the CAA.

Aviation: Exhaust Emissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what estimate he has made of the share of UK greenhouse gas emissions which will come from the aviation sector in 2050, calculated on the same basis as the figures in paragraph 1.6 of Annex K of the UK Air Passenger Demand and carbon dioxide forecasts published in November 2007 and on the assumption that the UK achieves an 80 per cent. cut in carbon dioxide emissions by 2050 but with the other forecasts remaining unchanged. (236342)

[holding answer 17 November 2008]: “UK Air Passenger Demand and CO2 forecasts” (November 2007) included an estimate of the share of UK emissions accounted for by aviation in 2050. This assumed the UK domestic target for CO2 reductions in 2050 was 60 per cent. below 1990 levels and that abatement effort to meet the target was predominantly in the rest of the economy, with aviation abatement taking the form of fuel efficiency (resulting from fleet renewal and technological development) and air traffic management improvements, in line with the assumptions underlying the forecasts.

On the basis of the same assumptions used in the November 2007 document, but taking an 80 per cent. reduction target, the share for aviation in 2050 would be around 35 per cent. To account for the non-CO2 climate change effects of aviation, consistent with the 2007 document, for simplicity a radiative forcing factor of 1.9 could be applied to aviation’s CO2 emissions. On this basis, aviation’s share would rise to around 41 per cent. The relativity between the CO2 and non-CO2 impacts may change over this time frame which would imply a different radiative forcing factor.

These estimates are based on central emissions forecasts. Forecasts over such a long term time frame are subject to significant uncertainty. Adopting alternative underlying assumptions to reflect these uncertainties would therefore change the estimate of aviation’s share of emissions.

Under an 80 per cent. target, not all parts of the UK economy would be expected to contribute equally to the total emissions reductions required. Sectors that are more carbon intensive, or in which abatement options are expensive or particularly difficult, would be expected to make up an increasing share of total UK emissions over time.

It should be noted that the Department for Transport is currently updating its forecasts of aviation emissions for all years to 2050 and these are expected to be published before the end of the year. The estimate of aviation’s share of emissions will therefore be updated in line with those new estimates.

The basis of UK aviation CO2 forecasts is estimates of emissions from UK sales of aviation fuels. This is consistent with the UK’s reporting of international aviation emissions to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Estimates of emissions from fuel used for international aviation do not form part of the UK’s national emissions inventory, as there has been no international agreement on how to allocate them to individual countries.

Dartford-Thurrock Crossing: Tolls

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what estimate he has made of the revenue from the new toll charges for the Dartford Crossing in each of the next three years; and what estimate he has made of the amount to be for gone in revenue through the discount to Dartford and Thurrock residents in each year. (237186)

[holding answer 18 November 2008]: In our 2006 consultation document on the proposed new charging regime we estimated that revenues could increase by around £7 million in the first year, or around 10 per cent., though this depends on how many users opt to pay by tag and therefore continue to pay £1.00 for cars. Our 2008 consultation document on the local discount scheme gave an indicative estimate that the local resident discount scheme could reduce revenues by about £2 million, depending on high levels of take-up by those eligible. On this basis the overall increase in revenues would be around £5 million per year.

Driving: Licensing

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) if he will delay implementation of the provisions of the Second EC Driving Licence Directive until the proposed network of multi-purpose test centres has been established; (233142)

(2) if he will permit the on-road and off-road testing of motorcycle drivers to take place separately until the proposed network of multi-purpose test centres has been established.

The implementation of the new practical motorcycle test has been deferred until the end of March 2009 to enable the development of new solutions for providing a wider range of locations from which to offer the test.

The Driving Standards Agency is discussing with motorcycling stakeholders a testing arrangement based on separate off and on-road modules. A formal consultation will be necessary if a modular test is to be published.

Maritime and Coastguard Agency: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many times since the formation of his Department the Maritime and Coastguard Agency has sought additional funding to cover budgetary shortfalls; how much funding was (a) sought and (b) granted on each occasion; and what the extent of the budgetary shortfall was in each case. (234781)

The Maritime and Coastguard Agency’s (MCA) budget is under continuous review through dialogue between the Agency and the Department for Transport, taking account of the ministerial targets and other priorities. It is through this process (including routine annual estimates, winter and spring supplementary reporting) that agreed budgetary adjustments are made including both increases and decreases in expenditure and increases and decreases in income generated. This also includes funding transfers to and from other Agencies/Departments reflecting changes in work requirements.

Since the formation of the Department for Transport in 2002 the following adjustments were made to the MCA’s budgetary position via the winter and spring supplementary process.

£000

Winter supplementary

Spring supplementary

2002-03

1,200

2003-04

10,924

1,210

2004-05

12,958

2005-06

2,346

- 4,217

2006-07

3,107

2007-08

170

13,310

Park and Ride Schemes: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much funding was provided from central Government to local government for the creation of park and ride schemes in the latest period for which figures are available; and what monitoring processes are in place to assess the effectiveness of such expenditure. (237006)

Park and ride schemes in English local authorities outside London are one of a number of measures generally funded through the integrated transport block, which the Department for Transport allocates to support local authorities’ local transport plans (LTPs). Allocations total £576 million for 2008-09.

During the first LTP period (2001-06), local transport authorities in England (outside London) spent a total of £72.5 million of DfT funding on improving 92 existing park and ride facilities and delivering 76 new park and ride schemes.

LTP guidance issued by the Department emphasises that it is the responsibility of local authorities to put systems in place to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of such schemes. In addition, DfT commissions research periodically into the overall effectiveness of the integrated transport block funding: the latest findings from 2006 indicate that projects undertaken with this funding represent good value for public money.

Roads: Accidents

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many road traffic collisions resulting in death or serious injury and involving one or more drivers with a recorded blood alcohol level of between 50 and 80 mg per 100 ml of blood were recorded in each of the last 10 years, broken down by police authority. (235828)

Information on the blood alcohol level of drivers involved in personal injury road accidents is not routinely collected.

The level of alcohol in the blood of road accident fatalities aged 16 or over who die within 12 hours of a road accident is provided by coroners in England and Wales and by Procurators Fiscal in Scotland. This information is only available for around two-thirds of motor vehicle drivers killed in personal injury road accidents. Information on the blood alcohol level of drivers who are not killed is not collected.

Roads: Repairs and Maintenance

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many miles of new roads were added to the Strategic Road Network in each of the last 10 years. (227086)

The following table shows the total miles of new trunk road and motorway that have been added to the Strategic Road Network by the Highways Agency in each of the last 10 years.

Miles

Calendar year

Scheme additional length to SRN

Scheme additional lane capacity to SRN

Total extra capacity

1997

38.6

39.2

77.8

1998

12.3

41.4

53.7

1999

15.6

13.4

29.0

2000

0.0

22.4

22.4

2001

0.0

0.0

0.0

2002

19.0

19.0

19.0

2003

26.6

27.5

54.1

2004

10.9

16.8

27.7

2005

7.9

13.4

21.3

2006

15.3

22.5

37.8

2007

10.3

15.9

26.2

Total

156.5

212.5

369.0

The data do not take into account any de-trunking/realignment of the Strategic Road Network which may be within the scope of schemes.

The data are the result of an exercise carried out by the Highways Agency over the spring of 2008 to verify information relating to lane km of motorway and non-motorways built since 1997.

This table therefore supersedes any previous tables produced by the Highways Agency.

Safety Service Delivery and Logistics Group

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the responsibilities of the Safety, Service Delivery and Logistics Group are; what projects the group is conducting; and from which budget project expenditure is met in each case. (234905)

The Safety, Service Delivery and Logistics (SSDL) Group was created on 1 April 2007 as part of a Department for Transport (DFT) reorganisation. The new structure combined the former DVO Group with GCDA (Government Car and Despatch Agency), the Road and Vehicles Safety Standards (RVSS) directorate and the Logistics and Freight policy division. In April 2008, SSDL was joined by the Information Management Directorate (IMD). The Group brings policy and delivery agendas closer together and provides added momentum to the pace of change needed to deliver the Department's objectives.

The SSDL Group aims to be a leader in modern and efficient public service while promoting road safety, effective logistics, and a cleaner environment. The Group works closely with its partners to deliver quality services to customers.

The SSDL agencies’ current capital plans are all included in their individual business plans, which are available in the House Library.

Of the five SSDL agencies, the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA), Driving Standards Agency (DSA) and the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency (VOSA) are classified as trading funds and capital expenditure is therefore funded from repayable loans which are provided to them from the DFT or from statutory fees.

VCA and GCDA are funded centrally by the Department.

Shipping: Safety

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when the Third Maritime Safety Package will be implemented in the UK. (237742)

The negotiations are still continuing between the EU member states and the European Parliament on the Third Maritime Safety Package. If agreement on the package is reached in the next few weeks, the UK will implement most of the legislation by 2011.

Transport: Hazardous Materials

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when the Hazardous and Noxious Substance Convention will be implemented in the UK. (237743)

There are a number of technical problems with the text of the convention that have prevented the UK, together with many other EU member states and third country states, from ratifying the Hazardous and Noxious Substances (HNS) Convention, 1996. As a result, the requirements for bringing the convention into force internationally have not yet been met.

In order to correct the inherent problems with the current convention, the international maritime community has agreed to develop a protocol, the text of which was agreed at the Legal Committee of the International Maritime Organisation in October 2009. The UK will ratify the amended convention as soon as possible after the protocol has been agreed at a Diplomatic Conference (expected to take place in 2010).

Transport: York

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how much local transport grant was given to the City of York unitary authority in each year since its creation. (236882)

The Department for Transport has provided the following grants for local transport to the City of York since it was established as a unitary authority in April 1996 in the following two tables.

£ million

Integrated transport block

Highways maintenance

Other funding1

Total local transport funding

2007-08

4.141

1.419

0.247

5.807

2006-07

4.478

1.386

0.514

6.378

2005-06

4.900

1.325

6.225

2004-05

4.840

1.462

0.840

7.142

2003-04

4.700

1.281

2.200

8.181

2002-03

4.400

1.155

1.139

6.694

2001-02

4.900

1,095

5.995

2000-01

1.550

0.712

2.262

1 Other funding covers detrunking, road safety grants, reward funding, re-allocated supplementary credit approvals (SCA), bus real time information.

Funding allocations made prior to local transport plan funding.

£ million

Transport supplementary grant

Annual capital guideline

Supplementary credit approval

Total

1999-2000

0.338

0.450

1.195

1.983

1998-99

0.168

0.189

0.770

1.127

1997-98

10.706

10.706

0.800

2.212

1996-97

11.284

11.284

0.772

3.34

1 Covers funding of £3.238 million for the Peasholme Green Bridge major scheme.

Revenue expenditure on transport is generally supported through the Department for Communities and Local Government’s Formula Grant.

Defence

Afghanistan: Peacekeeping Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many UK troops have been deployed as part of the operational mentor and liaison team programme in Afghanistan since September 2007; and how many have been killed or injured in each battalion. (234155)

Seven UK operational mentoring and liaison teams (OMLTs) work alongside the Afghan National Army in Helmand province. These teams total between 250 and 300 personnel at any one time. Approximately 800 personnel have undertaken this role since September 2007.

Fatalities and injuries are not recorded centrally by tasking, and troops from the infantry battalions providing OMLTs undertake other tasks as well. The three battalions that have provided OMLT teams since September 2007 have suffered the following number of fatalities overall:

2nd Battalion, The Yorkshire Regiment (Herrick 7): 3

1st Battalion, The Royal Irish Regiment (Herrick 8): 2

1st Battalion, The Rifles (Herrick 9): 0

For reasons of medical confidentiality, it is our policy not to produce a detailed breakdown of injuries by unit. However the Ministry of Defence does publish information regarding fatalities and statistical details of non-fatal injuries suffered by UK service personnel and civilian employees in Afghanistan on a fortnightly basis, two weeks in arrears. This can be found on the departmental website at the following address:

http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FactSheets/OperationsFactsheets/OperationsInAfghanistanBritishFatalities.htm

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether there have been any instances of aerial attacks on civilians in Afghanistan by British aircraft as a result of (a) error and (b) deception; and if he will make a statement. (236074)

I have nothing to add to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Leyton and Wanstead (Harry Cohen) on 20 October 2008, Official Report, column 118W.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the procedures are for ensuring that British military air strikes are not directed against civilians in Afghanistan. (236075)

The deliberate targeting of civilians would represent a direct contravention of international law. A wide range of checks and balances exist within the UK military chain of command to ensure that this can never happen. These include provision of absolutely clear direction into theatre and the deployment of legal and other experts to ensure this direction is followed.

Sadly, on a very small number of occasions, civilian casualties inadvertently result from the use of air-launched weapons. The UK, along with our partners in the International Security Assistance Force, makes every effort possible to minimise the risks of this occurring. Release of air-launched weapons is coordinated by controllers on the ground, who are fully trained in the use of lethal force, law of armed conflict and the appropriate rules of engagement. Controllers and pilots communicate with each other to ensure that the target is accurately identified, using target designating equipment where appropriate, and the weapon and method of attack is selected so as to minimise any risk of civilian deaths or injury, or damage to civilian property.

The risk of civilians becoming involved in military operations is greatly exacerbated by the tactics employed by the insurgent forces, who frequently attack UK and ISAF forces from within civilian locations.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether Harrier will be subject to a programme review in 2009 if it is withdrawn from Afghanistan (a) before and (b) after 1 April 2009. (236193)

[holding answer 17 November 2008]: We keep all our programmes under regular review as part of our planning process. This applies irrespective of operational deployments.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many Pakistani military personnel are (a) assigned, (b) attached and (c) embedded with UK armed forces in Regional Command South. (236451)

There are currently no personnel from the Pakistani armed forces assigned, attached or embedded with UK armed forces in Regional Command (South).

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many anthropologists are assigned to work with UK armed forces operating in Afghanistan. (236452)

There are no anthropologists assigned to work with UK armed forces operating in Afghanistan. Training on cultural issues is, however, provided to UK forces prior to their deployment to Afghanistan.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how many weeks passed between (a) the date of injury and the date of the decision that compensation was due and (b) the date of the decision that compensation was due and the date of first payment in the cases of each of the 18 personnel who were very seriously injured in Afghanistan in 2006 who have received compensation; (236626)

(2) how many weeks passed between (a) the date of injury and the date of the decision that compensation was due and (b) the date of the decision that compensation was due and the date of the first payment in the case of each of the 13 personnel who were seriously injured in Afghanistan in 2006 who have received compensation;

(3) how many weeks passed between (a) the date of injury and the date of the decision that compensation was due and (b) the date of the decision that compensation was due and the date of the first payment in the case of each of the 40 personnel who were seriously injured in Afghanistan in 2007 who have received compensation;

(4) how many weeks passed between (a) the date of injury and the date of the decision that compensation was due and (b) the date of the decision that compensation was due and the date of the first payment in the cases of each of the 23 personnel who were very seriously injured in Afghanistan in 2007 who have received compensation.

The time between an individual’s date of injury and the date on which they make a claim for compensation under the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) varies from person to person. For this reason, any figures produced on the time between the date of injury and the date of the decision that compensation is due will be misleading. The time between the date each claim was registered under the AFCS and the date of the decision that compensation is due, has been calculated for personnel that were seriously injured (SI) or very seriously injured (VSI) in Afghanistan during 2006 and 2007.

For data protection purposes and to maintain anonymity of claimants, information cannot be provided at individual level. Table 1 as follows presents the median length of time in weeks between the date on which a claim was registered under the AFCS and the date of the decision that compensation was due, for personnel with a cleared claim under the AFCS. Figures are presented by severity and year of injury in Afghanistan.

Table 1: Median number of weeks between the date a claim was registered and the date of the decision that compensation was due, by severity and year of injury in Afghanistan1

Number of weeks (median)

2006

Seriously Injured

10

Very Seriously Injured

13

2007

Seriously Injured

14

Very Seriously Injured

14

1 Figures are based on those that have had a decision made following their claim under the AFCS:

8 out of the 13 personnel who were SI and 16 of the 18 personnel who were VSI in Afghanistan during 2006, and 31 of the 40 personnel who were SI and 21 of the 23 personnel who were VSI in Afghanistan during 2007.

For data protection purposes and to maintain anonymity of claimants, information cannot be provided at individual level. Information on actual date of compensation payment under the AFCS is normally recorded on the joint personnel administration (JPA) database. JPA roll-out for the RAF, Navy and Army was 1 April 2006, 1 November 2006 and 1 April 2007 respectively. Payment dates prior to JPA roll-out could be collected only at disproportionate cost. Table 2 presents the median length of time in days between the date of the decision that compensation was due under the AFCS and the actual date of payment, for those recorded on JPA. 63 out of 76 had a recorded payment date on JPA. Figures are presented by severity and year of injury in Afghanistan.

Table 2: Median number of days between the date of the decision that compensation was due, and the actual date of payment, by severity and year of injury in Afghanistan1, 2

Number of days (median)

2006

Seriously Injured

9

Very Seriously Injured

8

2007

Seriously Injured

7

Very Seriously Injured

7

1 Figures are based on those that have had a decision made following their claim under the AFCS:

8 out of the 13 personnel who were SI and 16 of the 18 personnel who were VSI in Afghanistan during 2006, and 31 of the 40 personnel who were SI and 21 of the 23 personnel who were VSI in Afghanistan during 2007.

2 Figures are based on those that have payment details on JPA:

two out of the eight personnel who were SI and 10 out of the 16 personnel who were VSI in Afghanistan during 2006, and 30 out of the 31 personnel who were SI and all of those VSI in Afghanistan during 2007.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how much compensation has been paid to each of the 13 personnel who were seriously injured in Afghanistan in 2006 who have received compensation; (236627)

(2) how much compensation was awarded to each of the 40 personnel who were seriously injured in Afghanistan in 2007 who have received compensation;

(3) how much compensation was awarded to each of the 23 personnel who were very seriously injured in Afghanistan in 2007 who have received compensation.

Information on compensation amounts paid out to those personnel that were seriously injured or very seriously injured in Afghanistan during 2006 and 2007 could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how many of the 13 personnel who were seriously injured in Afghanistan in 2006 have subsequently left military service; how many weeks passed from the date of the injury to the date of their leaving military service in each case; and whether each serviceman or servicewoman received compensation for their injury; (236630)

(2) how many of the 40 personnel who were seriously injured in Afghanistan in 2007 have subsequently left military service; how many weeks passed from the date of the injury to the date of their leaving military service in each case; and whether each serviceman or servicewoman received compensation for their injury;

(3) how many of the 18 personnel who were very seriously injured in Afghanistan in 2006 have subsequently left military service; how many weeks passed from the date of the injury to the date of their leaving military service in each case; and whether each serviceman or servicewoman who left in such circumstances received compensation for their injury;

(4) how many of the 23 personnel who were very seriously injured in Afghanistan in 2007 have subsequently left military service; how many weeks passed from the date of the injury to the date of their leaving military service in each case; and whether each serviceman or servicewoman who left in such circumstances received compensation for their injury.

Of the 13 personnel who were seriously injured in Afghanistan during 2006, six personnel have subsequently left service as at 13 November 2008. Five of these personnel were awarded compensation following an in-service claim under the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS), the remaining one person went on to have a claim automatically generated for them following a medical discharge. The outcome of this claim is currently pending.

Of the 18 personnel who were very seriously injured in Afghanistan during 2006, two personnel have subsequently left service as at 13 November 2008. Both were awarded compensation under the AFCS following an in-service claim registered whiles they were still serving.

Of the 40 personnel who were seriously injured in Afghanistan during 2007, two personnel have subsequently left service as at 13 November 2008, Both were awarded compensation under the AFCS following an in-service claim registered while they were still serving.

Of the 23 personnel who were very seriously injured in Afghanistan during 2007, two personnel have subsequently left service as at 13 November 2008. Both were awarded compensation under the AFCS following an in-service claim registered while they were still serving.

For data protection purposes and to maintain anonymity of claimants, information cannot be provided on the time between the date of injury and the date of exit from service at individual level.

The following table presents the median length of time in weeks between the date of injury and date of exit from service for personnel that have subsequently left service following their injury. Figures are presented by severity and year of injury in Afghanistan.

Median number of weeks between date of injury and date of exit from service, by severity and year of injury in Afghanistan for those that had left service by 13 November 2008

Number of weeks (median)

2006

Seriously injured

58

Very seriously injured

79

2007

Seriously injured

70

Very seriously injured

76

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of Scimitar armoured reconnaisance vehicles in Afghanistan have been serviceable in each of the last 12 months. (237064)

The following table shows availability of the Scimitar Armoured Reconnaissance Vehicle in Afghanistan for each of the last 12 months.

Average availability (percentage)

November 2007

81

December 2007

89

January 2008

1

February 2008

78

March 2008

77

April 2008

49

May 2008

36

June 2008

24

July 2008

53

August 2008

37

September 2008

87

October 2008

75

1 No figures available

Recognising that Scimitar availability in Afghanistan is much lower in summer due to extremely hot and dusty conditions, rapid modifications have been made this year to improve availability. The Scimitar vehicle is also about to undergo an urgent package of measures to improve its performance and availability in hot, high and dusty conditions.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much the NATO and allied military presence in Afghanistan cost in each year for which figures are available. (237116)

I am only able to comment on those costs relating to the MOD and NATO common-funded costs. I am not able to comment on (and nor does the Department hold information concerning) individual allies' operational costs. MOD identifies the costs of UK operations in terms of the net additional costs it has incurred, which includes the costs that the Department would have incurred regardless of the operation taking place, such as wages and salaries. Reduced costs on activities that have not occurred because of the operation—training exercises for example—are also taken into account in arriving at the net figures.

Operational costs are calculated on an annual basis which are then audited by the National Audit Office. The UK operational costs for Afghanistan are set out in the following table:

£ million

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Total to date

Operations in Afghanistan total resource costs

187

236

36

58

148

560

1,071

2,296

Expenditure on capital equipment

34

75

10

9

51

178

433

790

Total

221

311

46

67

199

738

1,504

3,086

NATO common-funded costs for Afghanistan including the UK's share (which is incorporated in the operational costs) are set out in the following table:

Financial year

NATO cost1(£ million)

Approximate UK share(percentage)

Approximate UK financial contribution(£ million)

2003-04

35.771

12

4.293

2004-05

76.572

12

9.187

2005-06

81.488

12

9.779

2006-07

121.479

12

14.577

2007-08

162.291

12

16.222

1 Running costs plus capital investment

Armed Forces: Divorce

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 19 February 2007, Official Report, column 302W, what proportion of armed forces personnel disabled through injury or service were divorced in each year between 2002 and 2006, broken down by (a) those aged 24 years old and younger, (b) 25 to 34 years old, (c) 35 to 44 years old, (d) 45 to 54 years old and (e) those 55 years old and older; what assessment he has made of recent trends in divorce rates for service personnel who have seen active service; and if he will make a statement. (236489)

Information on numbers of armed forces personnel classed as disabled and divorced is not held centrally and can be provided only at disproportionate cost.

There has been no recent assessment of divorce rate trends for Service personnel.

Armed Forces: Labour Turnover

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what the (a) inflow and (b) outflow of helicopter crew pilots was in each month in the last three years, broken down by helicopter type; (235428)

(2) what the (a) inflow and (b) outflow of helicopter crew pilots has been in each year since 2003, broken down by helicopter type.

The information requested is not held centrally or available in the format requested. however some information is held by the single services and this is as follows:

Royal Navy

Helicopter crew inflow into the Royal Navy, by type of helicopter, between 1 April 2003 and 20 September 2008 is as follows:

Inflow

Sea King 4

62

Sea King 5/7

4

Lynx Mk8

44

Lynx Mk7

9

Merlin

28

Pilot outflow from the Royal Navy in the period requested is not held in such a manner to allow a breakdown between pilots of fixed wing or rotary wing aircraft.

Army

Army inflow to trained strength from training is as follows:

Inflow

2006

2007

2008

Attack helicopter

Lynx

Gazelle

Attack helicopter

Lynx

Gazelle

Attack helicopter

Lynx

Gazelle

January

February

5

5

March

2

3

April

4

1

3

May

4

12

3

June

7

4

2

July

6

2

5

August

September

4

7

4

October

6

3

1

November

3

9

December

3

13

3

Total

10

30

5

16

21

4

17

15

6

Army outflow is as follows:

Outflow

2006

2007

2008

Attack helicopter

Lynx

Gazelle

Attack helicopter

Lynx

Gazelle

Attack helicopter

Lynx

Gazelle

January

3

2

6

1

1

2

February

3

4

4

1

March

1

2

3

1

2

2

April

3

1

5

3

1

May

7

2

3

1

4

1

June

1

3

1

3

2

4

3

July

1

1

3

1

5

August

1

4

1

1

1

2

3

September

3

3

1

1

1

1

October

3

1

1

1

1

2

1

November

3

1

2

1

5

December

3

1

1

3

Total

2

37

14

4

33

7

10

37

6

RAF

RAF inflow to trained strength from training, between August 2005 and August 2008 is as follows:

Inflow

Chinook

86

Puma

42

Merlin

46

Sea King

41

RAF outflow between April 2003 and March 2006 was some 100 helicopter pilots.

Armed Forces: Self-mutilation

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what steps have been taken at the Duchess of Kent Psychiatric Hospital to ensure that medical staff are trained in the procedures to be employed following an assessment that military personnel about to be discharged back to barracks may be at risk of self-harm. (236185)

The Duchess of Kent Psychiatric Hospital was closed in 2003 as part of the Defence Medical Services’ move (in accordance with clinical best practice) towards providing treatment regionally, primarily through enhanced out-patient facilities and the contracting-out of in-patient treatment. The military community treatment capability was enhanced and the Defence Medical Services provide service personnel with speedy access to skilled and effective help and treatment that is flexible and based around their individual needs. A military Department of Community Mental Health (DCMH) is located a short distance from the old hospital ward.

Defence Medical Services mental health personnel undertake the same training, and obtain the same qualifications as their civilian counterparts. Psychologists and social workers who work for the defence mental health services are directly recruited fully trained, and all personnel engage in continuing professional development as recommended by the various professional bodies (such as the Royal College of Psychiatrists; Nursing and Midwifery Council and British Psychological Society). All training is conducted under the direction and administration of the Defence Postgraduate Medical Deanery and this organisation is advised by the Defence Consultant Advisor in Psychiatry.

The military Departments of Community Mental Health (DCMHs) assess all service personnel referred to them for risk in accordance with NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) Clinical Guidelines which include the identification of clinical and demographic features known to be associated with risk of further self harm and/or suicide. An appropriate care plan is agreed with the individual, in consultation with the unit medical officer and appropriately supervised treatment is implemented, and similar procedures take place where individuals are being discharged from in-patient care.

Mental health practitioners will also alert the chain of command where there is clear risk of death or serious harm to the patient or others, or where reasons underpinning the suicidal intent may also impact on others, balancing the issues of confidentiality and consent against the duty of care to the patient, as well as to others who might be harmed by a suicide attempt.

Army

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has made of the relative costs of a Gurkha infantry battalion and an English line infantry battalion in light of current policy and recent legal judgments. (231763)

The cost of a Gurkha infantry is broadly in line with that of British line infantry battalion.

I refer the hon. Member to the written ministerial statement made on 8 March 2007, Official Report, columns 141-42WS which explained that Gurkhas are now treated exactly the same as their UK recruited counterparts and receive the same benefits, with certain exceptions to satisfy the Nepalese Government.

The recent legal judgments in relation to pensions and immigration have had no impact on the cost of serving Gurkhas.

Departmental Aviation

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) how many flights have been taken by his Department’s civil servants of each grade in (a) first class, (b) business class and (c) economy in each month of 2008; (237286)

(2) how much (a) first class, (b) business class and (c) economy class air travel for his Department’s civil servants cost his Department in the last 12 months; and what criteria are used to determine the class in which such staff fly.

The information is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. All travel is conducted in accordance with the guidelines in Joint Service Publication (JSP) 800: Defence Movements and Transportation Regulations, Volume 2, Passenger Travel Instructions which sets out the criteria to be applied, dependent upon rank and the length of the flight involved.

Departmental Electronic Equipment

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much his Department and its agencies have spent on (a) flat screen televisions, (b) DVD players and (c) stereo equipment in each of the last three years. (237434)

This information is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. We apply the same principles to buying televisions, DVD players and stereo equipment that we do to buying all goods or services. These principles include securing best value for money, ensuring probity and accountability, enabling competition wherever possible, and ensuring compliance with the relevant provisions of UK and EU law.

Departmental Information Officers

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many full-time equivalent press officers (a) work and (b) provide assistance for his Department. (232972)

There are currently 108 full-time press officers listed in the Chief Office of Information's White Book for the Ministry of Defence not including those in agencies.

Press offices include civilian and military staff working across the Department (including within the single services) and are defined as those who directly interface with national or regional media on news issues.

Departmental Land

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many and what percentage of the overseas estate is in each grade, broken down by location. (235430)

Of the overseas estate, only living accommodation is graded for either condition or charge. Grade for charge (GfC) is an assessment of the chargeable condition of accommodation, along with other factors such as its size, location and closeness to amenities.

Other than GfC no separate assessment is made of the condition of all 71,000 service family accommodation (SFA) properties worldwide. Overseas SFA is at the following GfC:

G1fCG2fCG3fCG4fC

Country

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

Cyprus

504

22

173

8

1,211

54

Falkland/Ascension Islands

96

100

Germany

2,058

16

5,943

47

3,508

30

1,061

8

Gibraltar

52

11

96

21

87

19

194

43

Rest of the world

187

10

658

35

430

23

562

30

Total

2,297

13

7,211

42

4,198

24

3,124

18

As well as being assessed for its grade for charge, all single living accommodation (SLA) is also separately assessed for its physical condition and ‘scale’, as defined in Joint Service Publication 319 which is available to view at

http://www.defence-estates.mod.uk/publications/isp/isp315/volume1/index.php.

This methodology, which excludes environmental and location factors, is considered a better indicator of the physical condition of the accommodation.

As at June 2008, overseas SLA bed-spaces were at the following grade.

Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4

Country

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

Cyprus

26

2

614

43

782

55

Falkland/Ascension Islands

10

0.3

3,438

99.7

Germany

2,639

17

1,547

10

4,746

31

6,504

42

Gibraltar

225

52

84

19

128

29

Rest of the world

32

2

44

3

59

3

1,523

92

Total

2,707

12

1,816

8

5,503

25

12,375

55

We accept that some service accommodation is not of a standard that our service personnel and their families deserve and steps are being taken to address this. Over the next decade £8.4 billion will be spent on accommodation, of which over £3 billion will be on improving and upgrading accommodation.

Departmental Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 29 October 2008, Official Report, column 1032W, how many staff in his Department are receiving full salaries without being allocated work. (234420)

As at 5 November 2008, there were some 525 MOD civil servants who were in the civilian redeployment pool because their substantive posts had reached an end, or because they were returning from overseas or extended absence. A further 446 were in the redeployment pool because their posts were due to end within six months. Those staff receive preferential consideration for posts. While in the redeployment pool, staff whose substantive posts have ended remain in their posts, for which they continue to receive their normal salaries. They continue to be funded and managed by their previous management, who assist them with their development and job search and employ them on appropriate temporary tasks. As I explained in my answer on 21 October, Official Report, column 191W, while there may exceptionally be occasions where such temporary work is not available, that situation is continuously changing and is not recorded centrally.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many staff in his Department did not achieve an acceptable assessment grade in their annual report in the latest reporting year for which figures are available. (235227)

For the 2007-08 reporting year 93 MOD civilian staff were recorded as not receiving a performance award due to unsatisfactory work performance that was subject to the Department's restoring efficiency procedures.

This figure excludes MOD trading funds and agencies and does not include specialist occupational groups such as teachers, NHS grades, fire fighters and policeman, for whom records are not held centrally.

Departmental NDPBs

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the remit is of each non-departmental public body sponsored by his Department; and what budget each has been set for (a) 2008-09, (b) 2009-10 and (c) 2010-11. (236920)

The remit of each of the non-departmental public bodies sponsored by the MOD can be found in the supplementary document on NDPBs to the MOD annual report and accounts 2007-08, which can be found on the MOD internet site at the following link:

http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/AboutDefence/CorporatePublications/AnnualReports/MODAnnualReports0708/SupplementaryDocuments200708.htm

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 30 October 2008, Official Report, column 1230W, in respect of funding of Executive NDPBs. The advisory NDPBs sponsored by the Department incur little or no expenditure and are resourced from within the Department.

European Carrier Group Interoperability Initiative

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will place in the Library a copy of the Declaration of Intent with EU Partners on the European Carrier Group Interoperability Initiative. (235432)

I shall place a copy of the Declaration of Intent in the Library of the House.

Future Large Aircraft: Safety

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether a fuel inerting gas system will be fitted to the UK A400M fleet. (237069)

Yes, with the exception of one development aircraft that will either be retro-fitted with fuel-tank inerting at a later date, or if this proves impossible, excluded from use in areas of significant operational threat.

Future Surface Combatant

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the future roles are projected for each variant of the Future Surface Combatant. (235629)

[holding answer 17 November 2008]: It is currently planned that the Future Surface Combatant will replace and build on the capabilities of the T22 and T23 frigates. The programme is still in the concept phase, and the requirements for numbers and variants have not yet been finalised. The future roles to be undertaken by FSC have yet to be fully defined but will be coherent with the capabilities called for in the 2004 Defence White Paper, ‘Delivering Security in a Changing World, Future Capabilities’ (Cm 6269).

Military Aircraft

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence which close air support capabilities provided by Harriers are not able to be provided by Tornados. (236789)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 10 November 2008, Official Report, column 775W.

Military Aircraft: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much live training with submarines have (a) Merlin HM MK1 and (b) Nimrod MR2 crews have undertaken in each month of the last three years. (237070)

The amount of time spent live training by Merlin HM MKl and Nimrod MR2 crews with submarines over the last three years has been recorded as follows:

Merlin HM MKl

Hours:Minutes

2006

2007

2008

January

9:10

12:50

12:35

February

11:30

27:55

80:35

March

5:40

40:20

63:15

April

25:15

98:35

120:10

May

145:20

116:00

24:10

June

176:35

63:20

32:45

July

0

36:40

23:50

August

0

0

0

September

54:30

7:35

52:30

October

24:00

58:00

98:45

November

25:35

49:05

December

0

9:10

Nimrod MR2

Hours:Minutes

2006

2007

2008

January

13:20

23:15

0

February

125:10

13:10

0

March

79:10

21:25

0

April

15:35

38:40

176:00

May

46:05

32:30

79:00

June

147:35

14:00

12:35

July

12:10

11:55

245:30

August

21:15

19:25

10:30

September

94:05

71:00

6:10

October

46:45

87:55

0

November

31:20

52:30

December

6:50

0

These figures do not reflect operational flying or airborne synthetic anti-submarine warfare training.

Military Attachés

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 15 July 2008, Official Report, columns 309-10W, on military attachés, what the reasons for the increase in the cost for the defence section in Albania between 2000-01 and 2001-02 were. (236761)

The reason for the increase in cost for the Defence Section in Albania between 2000-01 and 2001-02 was that in March 2001, the last month of financial year 2000-01, a Military Liaison Officer (MLO) was seconded to the British embassy in Albania to help assess the feasibility of establishing a defence section in that country. His pay-related costs during that time were funded from another budgetary area within the Ministry of Defence while his subsistence costs were funded from the attaché budget, as shown in the answer of 15 July 2008, Official Report, columns 309-10W. In April 2001 an accredited defence attaché and his support staff were deployed to Albania and funded from the attaché budget, with the result that the costs of the defence section for the full financial year (2001-02) are shown in the answer of 15 July 2008, Official Report, columns 309-10W.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 15 July 2008, Official Report, columns 309-10W, on military attachés, if he will publish a breakdown of the cost of the defence sections in (a) Paris and (b) Moscow for each of the last three years. (236762)

The following table provides a breakdown of the cost for the Defence sections in Paris and Moscow for the last three financial years.

Financial year

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Defence Section Paris

Pay-related costs including ERNIC, pension contributions and costs of living allowance

721,228

801,544

821,582

Support costs including residential utilities, medical and dental costs, travel and subsistence, local school children’s fees, entertainment, IT equipment, vehicle servicing repairs and personal security enhancements

423,182

352,524

361,337

Total cost

1,144,410

1,154,068

1,182,919

Defence Section Moscow

Pay-related costs including ERNIC, pension contributions, and costs of living allowance

1,154,091

1,128,165

1,112,310

Support costs including residential utilities, medical and dental costs, travel and subsistence, local school children’s fees, entertainment, IT equipment, vehicle servicing repairs and personal security enhancements

380,539

386,993

440,737

Total cost

1,534,631

1,515,158

1,553,047

Military Decorations

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will bring forward proposals to establish a medal for members of the armed forces injured or killed in combat, analogous to the Purple Heart medal issued in the United States. (236454)

I refer the hon. Member to the written ministerial statement the then Defence Secretary made on 10 June 2008, Official Report, column 10WS which announced the plans for additional recognition for the families of members of the armed forces who die on operations and as a result of terrorist action. He made it clear that much detailed work would be required to work out the detail of this plan. Good progress is being made but it will be some months before we are ready to implement the plan. We hope to announce further details before the end of the year on matters such as the design and the qualifying criteria.

Military Police

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many fatal incidents were investigated by the Royal Military Police Special Investigation Branch in each overseas theatre of operations since Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary’s inspection of August 2006; and what the outcome of each investigation was. (236157)

When UK armed forces personnel are killed on operations, the Royal Military Police Special Investigation branch RMP(SIB) carry out an investigation in order to determine if there is any criminal liability on the part of UK personnel. The evidence they gather is passed to the military chain of command. In more serious cases, the case papers may be referred for trial by court martial.

The RMP(SIB) have investigated 129 incidents involving UK armed forces fatalities which have occurred since 1 August 2006. Of these, 106 investigations resulted in no further action being taken against any member of the UK armed forces; 20 are ongoing; and three were referred to the Army Prosecuting Authority (APA). Of the three cases referred to the APA, one was discontinued and two resulted in trial by court martial.

The evidence collated by the RMP(SIB) is also passed to coroners. For details of outstanding inquests and verdicts, I refer the hon. Member to the written ministerial statement made by my right hon. Friends the Secretary of State for Defence and the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice on 30 October 2008, Official Report, column 36WS.

Navy: Defence Equipment

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make it his policy to provide Royal Navy ships with non-lethal weapons similar to those available to the US Navy for the interdiction of pirates in the Northern Indian Ocean. (237188)

[holding answer 18 November 2008]: The MOD has no current plans to fit non-lethal weapons to Royal Navy ships, although research continues to establish their potential utility. As with all emerging technologies, MOD continues to review the possibilities such innovation presents.

UK weapon systems are consistent with international protocols, such as the Geneva convention. Their use is governed by Rules of Engagement, which ensures the application of proportionate force appropriate to the prevailing circumstances and conditions.

Nuclear Disarmament

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will assess the implications for UK nuclear weapons policy of the speech by the United Nations Secretary-General on 24 October 2008 on the importance of nuclear disarmament and security in a nuclear weapons-free world. (236369)

I welcome the contribution to the debate on multilateral nuclear disarmament made by Mr. Ban in his speech to the East-West Institute in New York on 24 October and, specifically, his acknowledgment of the UK’s leading role. It is important that all states work together to create the security environment conducive to further multilateral disarmament, leading ultimately to a world free of nuclear weapons. This would include zero tolerance on instances of proliferation.

Piracy: Detainees

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what guidance has been issued to Royal Navy commanders on the detention of pirates on board Royal Navy vessels; and if he will make a statement. (237195)

[holding answer 18 November 2008]: Commanding officers of Royal Navy ships are issued with guidance on the applicable law and principles relating to the handling and detention of those suspected of committing offences on the high seas. In addition, the handling of detainees and the humanitarian principles governing that activity are laid down in UK armed forces doctrine. More generally, the conduct of counter-piracy operations is governed as necessary by the applicable rules of engagement specific to a particular mission.

RAF Brize Norton

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much further infrastructure work is required at RAF Brize Norton before the Hercules fleet arrives; and what his estimate is of the cost of that work. (237386)

A number of infrastructure projects are being undertaken at RAF Brize Norton in preparation for the arrival of the Hercules fleet. These include the relocation of a simulator training facility; relocation of Forward Support and stores; provision of suitable freight handling capacity; expansion of the aircraft battery bay and engine bay; relocation of Hercules Force HQ. Additionally the relocation of 47 Air Despatch Squadron will be required as part of the move.

Other infrastructure work is also being undertaken at Brize Norton which does not relate solely to the arrival of the Hercules fleet.

The full costs of all infrastructure works related to the arrival of the Hercules fleet are not identified separately and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what his latest estimate is of the timing of the Hercules fleet's removal to RAF Brize Norton; and how that removal will be phased. (237387)

The move of the C130K and C130J fleets from RAF Lyneham to RAF Brize Norton is being planned for Summer 2011. The move will be phased to ensure support to operations is maintained.

Submarines

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the maximum future endurance on station of the Astute-class submarines. (236076)

Once deployed, Astute can patrol for 90 days and should not require refuelling throughout her full service life of over 25 years.

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what the crew strength per boat is in terms of (a) officers and (b) men, in respect of the current generation of attack submarines; and what the crew strength will be in respect of each Astute-class submarine; (236077)

(2) what assessment he has made of the practicability of having two crews for each Astute-class submarine.

The manpower liability for an Astute and Trafalgar Class submarine is as follows:

Class

Trafalgar

Astute

Officers

15

16

Senior Rates

54

51

Junior Rates

84

73

Total

153

140

The Astute Class of submarine is and will continue to be manned using the watch rotational manning system currently employed for Royal Navy attack submarines. This system allows the required availability of the submarines to be met while ensuring leave and training periods for all personnel.

Tornado Aircraft

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the average number of flying hours for Tornado GR4 aircrew has been in each month in 2008 to date. (236462)

Average monthly flying hours for Tornado aircrew is not recorded centrally, and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

USA: Nuclear Weapons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will assess the implications for UK nuclear weapons policy of the speech made by the United States Defence Secretary Robert Gates on 28 October 2008 in respect of United States plans to retain and replace its nuclear weapons system and warheads. (236370)

In his speech at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, Secretary Gates considered a number of elements of the United States nuclear weapons policy. His general assessments closely match those articulated in the 2006 White Paper “The Future of the United Kingdom’s Nuclear Deterrent” (Cm 6994).

Communities and Local Government

Christmas

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much (a) her Department and (b) its agencies have spent on Christmas (a) cards, (b) parties and (c) decorations in the last 12 months. (237491)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 13 November 2008, Official Report, column 1322W, to the hon. Member for Hertford and Stortford (Mr. Prisk) and the answers given by my hon. Friend the Member for Gloucester (Mr. Dhanda) to the hon. Member for West Chelmsford (Mr. Burns) on 17 January 2008, Official Report, column 1472W and the hon. Member for Guildford (Anne Milton) on 4 February 2008, Official Report, column 839W. Information on decorations could be answered only at disproportionate cost.

Council Tax: Fraud

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) of 30 October 2008, Official Report, column 1258W, on council tax, if she will place in the Library a copy of the Audit Commission guidance to local authority fraud investigators on how to follow up potential frauds and other anomalies. (235860)

The guidance issued by the Audit Commission on the National Fraud Initiative (NFI) is limited to how to interpret and prioritise the data matches released through NFI. The Commission does not provide guidance on the investigation of the referrals. It is the responsibility of each participating body to investigate matches, where appropriate, in line with their own policies and procedures.

As part of its continued development programme, the Commission has introduced online training tutorials for NFI 2008-09. This training material is integrated into the NFI web application and as such cannot be provided separately. Brief guidance notes to supplement the online material will be made available before the launch of the NFI 2008-09 results on 28 January 2009. A copy of those notes will then be placed in the Library.

Copies of the Commission’s guidance material issued to participating bodies for NFI 2006-07 have been placed in the Library, although this material is now out of date.

Council Tax: Pensions

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what percentage of council tax receipts in England were used to fund pension schemes that are funded by local authorities in the latest period for which figures are available. (237002)

A proportion of total local authority revenue goes towards meeting pension liabilities and costs, but there is no specific proportion of council tax receipts which is used to meet this liability.

Departmental NDPBs

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the remit is of each non-departmental public body sponsored by her Department; and what budget each has been set for (a) 2008-09, (b) 2009-10 and (c) 2010-11. (236918)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 21 October 2008, Official Report, columns 227-28W. Information on NDPBs' remits may be found on their websites.

Energy Performance Certificates

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether her Department has made an assessment of the suitability of reduced data SAP conventions as a model for producing energy performance certificates. (235482)

The Reduced Data Standard Assessment Procedure (RDSAP) was developed from the Government's Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP), which apply to all new buildings, for the specific purposes of undertaking energy surveys of existing dwellings. The assessment on suitability was carried out during a three year development period which saw extensive research, analysis and testing by industry relating to the projects specific purposes, and the Building Research Establishment, before RDSAP was approved for use.

Essex County Council

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what discussions she has had with Essex County Council on its proposal for privatisation of its services; and if she will make a statement. (236975)

Housing Benefit

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what assessment her Department has made of the effect on the supply of private rented accommodation of the introduction of the local housing allowances. (237251)

No assessment has been made of the effect on the supply of private rented accommodation of the introduction of the local housing allowance as it is too early to do so. The local housing allowance became operational, nationwide, from 7 April 2008 and only applies to new claimants or existing claimants who have moved to a different address.

The independent review of the private rented sector which Ministers commissioned on 23 January 2008 concluded on 23 October and the published report, headed by Julie Rugg of the university of York, contains major recommendations to improve the way in which local authorities secure accommodation in the private rented sector for low income and vulnerable people.

Housing: Derelict Land

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what steps she plans to take to make brownfield sites available for housing development. (229864)

Building on brownfield land is essential if we are going to develop the homes that the country needs. Communities and Local Government's policies and programmes play a key part in ensuring that this happens. Through ‘Planning Policy Statement (PPS) 3: Housing’, for example, local planning authorities are required to plan for the long term by identifying developable sites for housing. The policy guidance maintains a continuing focus on recycling land and retains the national target that at least 60 per cent. of new homes should be built on brownfield land. Current performance against this target is 77 per cent.

Policy guidance is also supported by priorities given to delivery bodies, such as the new Homes and Communities Agency which will be established later this year. Sustainability, including the reuse of brownfield land, will be at the heart of its work with a priority to bring about the most effective use of land and the ability to acquire derelict land for the provision of new housing.

Also, in March this year the Government published their response to English Partnerships' recommendations for a national brownfield strategy. The strategy considers brownfield land in the widest sense including all types of development and will help site owners, developers and regulators in the process of returning brownfield land to beneficial use. Work in developing the strategy has demonstrated the importance of a joined-up approach to developing brownfield policy. CLG and DEFRA have agreed to sponsor a new national body—the National Brownfield Forum—to secure better co-ordination at national level. The forum brings together key Whitehall Departments, agencies and industry stakeholders and promotes a more cohesive and inclusive approach to brownfield policy development and encourages knowledge sharing and best practice.

Housing: Low Incomes

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) of 3 November 2008, Official Report, columns 124-5W, on housing: low incomes, and with reference to the December 2004 letter to local authority directors of housing from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's Divisional Head of Housing Data and Statistics, which property attributes and fields were requested by the Valuation Office Agency; and which were (a) top priority and (b) mandatory. (236152)

The information requested is provided in the following list. No information was imported directly into the Valuation Office Agency's property attribute database.

Mandatory

Address

Data provider's property reference number

Reference number of the data provider

Report date

Date that the data relates to

Top priority

Report generator

Valuation

Valuation cloned or not

Date of valuation

Type of dwelling or other form of accommodation

Form of structure within which the dwelling is located

Lifts

Year built

Floorspace

Number of private living rooms

Number of bedrooms

Number of bathrooms for exclusive use of the tenants

Housing: Valuation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) of 22 July 2008, Official Report, column 1400W, on housing: valuation, how many localities have been given a name in addition to a unique reference number. (235869)

Information Commissioner

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will implement the recommendations made in respect of her Department by the Information Commissioner in Practice Recommendation, reference FPR0189170. (236132)

Communities and Local Government will implement the recommendations made by the Information Commissioner in his Practice Recommendation, and is already making significant improvements in its performance.

Local Authorities: Business

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government which local authorities have introduced business improvement districts. (236182)

The following list shows the local authorities which have introduced business improvement districts:

Eastern region

Bedford borough council

Great Yarmouth borough council

Ipswich borough council

East midlands

Derby city council

North Kesteven district council

London

Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames

Islington council

LB of Havering

LB of Camden

LB of Southwark

LB of Lambeth

LB of Ealing

LB of Redbridge

Waltham Forest

Westminster city council

South-east

Arun district council

Brighton and Hove council

Croydon council

Fareham borough council

Winchester city council

South-west

Bristol city council

Plymouth city council

Swindon borough council

Taunton Deane borough council

West Dorset district council

North-east

Hartlepool borough council

North-west

Allerdale borough council

Blackburn with Darwen borough council

Blackpool borough council

Bolton metropolitan borough council

Halton borough council

Hyndburn borough council

Liverpool city council

Oldham borough council

Vale Royal borough council

West midlands

Birmingham city council

Cannock Chase DC

Coventry city council

Shrewsbury and Atcham borough council

Rugby borough council

Sandwell metropolitan borough council

West Sussex county council

Yorkshire and Humberside

Hull city council

Ryedale borough council

Local Authorities: Debt Collection

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what powers local authorities have to hire bailiffs to collect unpaid (a) council tax, (b) council housing rent and (c) parking fines. (235833)

Local authority enforcement powers, including the levying of distress, for the collection of unpaid council tax are contained in schedule 4 to the Local Government Finance Act 1992 and part VI of the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 (SI 1992/613).

Under part 6 of the Traffic Management Act 2004 and the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/3483) local authorities in England that have civil parking enforcement powers have the right to use certificated bailiffs to enforce unpaid penalty charge notices.

There are no powers for local authorities to use privately-employed certified bailiffs in respect of arrears of rent owed by their residential tenants. Action against tenants in rent arrears must take the form of court proceedings, in which case, court bailiffs may be used for enforcement of the order.

Local Authority Business Growth Incentive Scheme

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the policy basis was on which the NUTS 2 territorial groupings were used for the distribution of the new round of funding from the Local Authority Business Growth Incentive Scheme. (235928)

The proposed basis for the distribution of rewards in the new round of the Local Authority Business Growth Incentives Scheme is currently subject to consultation. The consultation closes on 20 November 2008. Local authorities have been invited to include, in their responses to the consultation, the sub-regional groupings they consider to be appropriate. No decision has yet been made about the groupings to be used for distributing reward in 2009-10.

Local Government: Bank Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) what estimate she has made of the average change in rate of return on local authority investments in 2009-10 resulting from new investment strategies prompted by the collapse of Icelandic banks; (235834)

(2) what estimate she has made of the aggregate loss incurred by local authorities as a result of a reduction in interest earned upon unreturned deposits held by Icelandic banks.

We have made no such estimates. The rate of return on investments by local authorities is a matter for individual councils, taking into account the Department’s investment guidance.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate she has made of the length of time it will take for local authorities to recover assets deposited in Icelandic banks. (235835)

The Government continue to work with the Icelandic authorities to ensure a fair deal for all UK depositors. The administrators of Heritable Bank Plc and Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Limited bank, Ernst and Young have agreed to provide an estimate on the level of recoverable funds so that local authorities may take this estimate into account in planning their budgets for financial year 2009-10.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether local authorities may invest in government-guaranteed bank bonds. (235837)

A local authority may invest in government-guaranteed bank bonds provided that this has been agreed by full council as part of its annual investment strategy.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer to the right hon. Member for Oxford, East (Mr. Smith) of 4 November 2008, Official Report, column 343W, on local authorities: bank services, if she will place in the Library the advice to local authorities from the Chartered Institute of Public Finance. (235865)

I will arrange for a copy of the advice to local authorities from the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy to be placed in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what assessment her Department's predecessor made of the amount of unrecovered deposits by local authorities in the former Bank of Credit and Commerce International, expressed as a proportion of all local authority deposits in 1991-92. (236129)

According to the liquidators' website at:

http://www.bcci.info/

admitted creditors of BCCI will have received 86.5 per cent. of their claims by December 2008.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the level of exposure of each local authority to Icelandic banks is. (236219)

I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Sutton and Cheam (Mr. Burstow) on 6 November, 2008 Official Report, column 724W.

Local Government: Elections

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate she has made of the likely effect on voter turnout of the decision to hold the forthcoming English local elections and elections to the European Parliament on the same date. (235802)

When taking the decisions, approved by Parliament, to hold the 2009 English local elections and European Parliament elections on the same date, we had regard to the evidence which showed that the turnout for the combined local and European elections in 2004, was significantly higher than the turnout for the previous equivalent elections which were not combined. For the European elections in 2004, the voter turnout was 38.5 per cent. compared to 24 per cent. in the previous European elections in 1999. For the 2004 district council elections, turnout was 41 per cent. compared to 30 per cent. for the previous equivalent district elections held in 2000.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate she has made of the likely effect on public expenditure of the decision to hold the forthcoming English local elections and elections to the European Parliament on the same date; and what plans have been made on the use of any savings accruing from that decision. (235803)

While it is difficult to provide an accurate estimate of such savings, the indications are that savings in the region of £10 million could result from holding the English local elections and elections to the European Parliament on the same day. To the extent that the costs of the European elections are reduced, this will be reflected in a lower call on the Consolidated Fund, while any reduction in the costs of local elections will reduce the call on councils' own resources.

Local Government: Reorganisation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what steps her Department takes to consult representatives of the historic counties when taking decisions on unitary authorities. (235800)

The Association of British Counties, which promotes the historic counties, have made representations to us during our consideration of councils’ unitary proposals and the current implementation of the nine new unitary councils approved by Parliament.

Non-Domestic Rates: Ports

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what her assessment is of the impact of retrospective changes to business rates on the port of Liverpool on employment and economic activity in Merseyside; and if she will make a statement. (237303)

There is a concern for businesses in the current economic climate receiving large backdated rated liabilities that have to be paid immediately, as the position for a number of port occupiers has demonstrated. We are looking urgently at options for mitigating the financial impact on businesses facing immediate payment of such significant backdated liabilities.

Non-Domestic Rates: Valuation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the Answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) of 30 October 2008, Official Report, column 1284W, on non-domestic rates: valuation, how many sub-locations there are in each billing authority area in England. (236033)

Racial Harassment

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many complaints of racial abuse relating to staff for which her Department is responsible have been (a) investigated and (b) upheld in the last 12 months. (236890)

There been no formal complaints of racial abuse relating to staff in the Department in the last 12 months.

Robert Tym Partnership

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government when she expects the Robert Tym Partnership to present its report on council tax and empty properties to her Department. (236190)

Severn Barrage

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether she has held discussions with the insurance industry on the effects on levels of home insurance of the potential flooding arising from the construction of a Severn Barrage. (235335)

I have been asked to reply.

Assessment of impacts on flood risk is an integral part of the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) commissioned by the Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Study. Should this Study proceed following internal review, further work will be undertaken to better understand the impacts on flood risk, land drainage and ground water levels arising from the construction of the short listed tidal power options for the Severn Estuary.

Small Businesses: Tax Allowances

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate she has made of (a) the number of firms that have taken up small business rate relief and (b) the reduction in business rate revenue attributable to the relief in the latest period for which figures are available. (235970)

I refer the hon. Member to the answers I gave the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) on 11 December 2007, Official Report, column 559W, and on 3 November 2008, Official Report, column 132W.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what recent estimate she has made of the take-up rate of small business rate relief. (235971)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) on 13 December 2007, Official Report, column 901W.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) of 30 October 2008, Official Report, column 1284W, on small business rates: tax allowances, if she will place in the Library a copy of the business rates information letter dated 19th September 2008. (236026)

All business rates information letters are available on the Department's website at the following internet address:

http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/busrats1.htm

The letter in question can be found at the following address:

http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/busrats/bri52008.pdf.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what procedure small firms will have to follow to claim the proposed exemption from supplementary business rates. (236092)

Travelling People

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many cases there have been of Green Belt land being released in order to build publicly-owned Gypsy and Traveller sites in the last 10 years. (237750)

We do not hold information on the release through the development plan process of Green Belt land for Gypsy and Traveller sites.

Valuation Office: Databases

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) of 6 November 2008, Official Report, column 684W, on Valuation Office: databases, what the 2008-09 budget for the database alignment exercise is; and whether the budget includes payments to Ordnance Survey. (236022)

The database alignment exercise is being undertaken by Ordnance Survey. No payments are being made to Ordinance Survey for the alignment work.

Health

Alcoholic Drinks: Learning Disability

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people with a learning disability received NHS treatment for (a) alcohol and (b) drug abuse in the last five years. (236826)

Alcoholic Drinks: Misuse

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate he has made of the number of children and young people who have parents with alcohol use problems. (237041)

The Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy for England, published in March 2004, estimated 1.3 million children were living with at least one parent who misused alcohol. A copy of the strategy has already been placed in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment his Department has made of the level of primary care trust spending on services to reduce alcohol harm. (237160)

Data on national health service spend on alcohol interventions are not collected, however, in 2005 the Alcohol Needs Assessment Research Project reported that the NHS in England, in 2003-04, spent an estimated £217 million on alcohol interventions. An extra £15 million in additional funding has been included within primary care trusts (PCTs) general allocations from 2007-08 to improve alcohol interventions.

Additionally, the National Audit Office have carried out an audit of NHS spend on alcohol interventions. Their report, “Reducing Alcohol Harm: health services in England for alcohol misuse”, was published in November 2008 and found, that where primary care trust expenditure on alcohol services was known, an average of £600,000 was spent on commissioning alcohol services in 2006-07. A copy of the report has been placed in the Library.

Care Homes: Injuries

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what guidance his Department provides on manual handling in order to minimise the risk of bruising to care home residents or persons in other care settings; (234839)

(2) what research his Department has commissioned on and what assessment it has made of the reasons for bruising of residents of care homes and persons in other care settings;

(3) what standards his Department has set for the (a) monitoring and (b) reporting of bruising caused to care home residents.

All health and care providers must ensure compliance with the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992.

The Care Homes Regulations 2001 and the Domiciliary Care Agencies Regulations 2002 require care providers to make suitable arrangements to provide a safe system for moving and handling service users.

The National Minimum Standards for Care Homes for Younger Adults, Older People and Domiciliary Care Agencies require care managers to ensure safe working practices, including moving and handling and use of techniques for moving people and objects that avoid injury to services users or staff.

The Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI), as the regulator, will require registered care providers to adhere to the relevant regulations on lifting and handling and to ensure that staff are trained and updated in appropriate techniques and on how to use equipment by an accredited trainer, and for equipment to be maintained at intervals recommended by the manufacturer.

The Department has not commissioned research into bruising of residents in care settings and does not specifically require bruising to be monitored or reported. However, Regulation 37 of the Care Homes Regulations requires care homes to keep records of and notify CSCI without delay of the death of, serious injury to and any event in the care home which adversely affects the well-being or safety of any service user. CSCI inspectors assess and view these records.

CSCI issues guidance logs to care providers on the CSCI Professionals website at:

http://www.csci.org.uk/professional/care_providers/all_services/guidance/guidance_log_care_homes_for_o.aspx.

These include guidance as to procedures CSCI would advise or expect to see in terms of manual handling in a care home.

Guidance on lifting and handling is also available on the Social Care Institute for Excellence website at:

http://www.scie-peoplemanagement.org.uk/resource/docPreview.asp?docID=18.

Through the National Carers Strategy, launched in June 2008, the “Caring with Confidence” programme has been established as a training programme for carers, with the first training delivered in August 2008 and distance-training modules available from January 2009. It is being run by a consortium, led by the Expert Patients Programme, and also includes the three main carers organisations—Carers UK, Crossroads and the Princess Royal Trust for Carers—and Partners in Policymaking. There is £4.4 million a year to fund the training programme, which will cover a range of issues, including lifting and handling.

Care Homes: Inspections

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what measures relating to infection control form part of the Commission for Social Care Inspection’s care home inspection programme; and if he will make a statement. (237040)

Providers of registered care services are responsible of the health and welfare of people using their services. The Care Homes Regulations 2001 require care homes to make suitable arrangements to prevent infection, toxic conditions and the spread of infection, and to maintain standards of hygiene. The national minimum standards (NMS) for care homes reinforce these requirements. The NMS relating to infection control are key standards; the Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) will always refer to them during a key inspection.

CSCI requires providers to report on the performance of their service annually. This includes specific questions about infection control. If the previous performance of the home gives rise to concerns, or CSCI has received information which raises particular issues, then it will focus on these areas during an inspection.

Continuing Care: Direct Payments

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people received continuing care payments in (a) England, (b) each strategic health authority and (c) each NHS trust in each of the last five years. (236944)

Data on the total number of people in receipt of continuing care in each year are not collected centrally.

Departmental Co-ordination

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what guidance his Department has received from HM Treasury in the last six months. (235724)

The Treasury issues a wide range of policy and financial guidance to Departments. This includes guidance on the publication of 2008 Autumn Performance Reports, and aspects of accounting including the implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards.

Departmental Land

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans he has for each of the sites owned by his Department and registered on the Register of Surplus Public Sector Land; what construction projects are planned for each site; and when he expects each site to be returned to use. (236442)

The Department is actively pursuing the disposal of all the sites in its control that are currently included on the Register of Surplus Public Sector Land. It will be for the purchasers of these sites to determine the use to which they are put and when they are returned to use.

Departmental Public Relations

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Rochford and Southend East (James Duddridge) of 6 October 2008, Official Report, columns 406-7W, on departmental public relations, which firms were employed; and what topic of work each undertook. (233879)

The public relations (PR) agencies which were employed through the Central Office of Information (COI) framework agreement and the topics of work were as follows:

2005-06

The Forster Company - Alcohol Harm Reduction Stakeholder Engagement Programme

Trimedia Communications - El 11 (health insurance card) PR programme

Munro and Forster Communications - NHS Institute PR

2006-07

Band and Brown Communications - PR for National Breastfeeding Awareness Week

Trimedia Communications - Independent Reconfiguration Panel PR

Pier 55 Ltd - NHS Business Services Authority advertorials

2007-08

Band and Brown Communications - PR for National Breastfeeding Awareness Week

Disabled People: North East

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many young people in (a) Gateshead and (b) Sunderland are registered as physically disabled. (235963)

Elderly: Mentally Incapacitated

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) care homes and (b) beds for the elderly mentally infirm there were in (i) England and (ii) each local authority in each of the last five years. (234362)

I am informed by the Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI) that it does not register care homes according to the age of residents. CSCI inspectors will decide at the time of an inspection whether to inspect a home against the national minimum standards (NMS) for care homes for older people or younger adults. This decision is based on the age profile of the residents of the home at the time of inspection.

CSCI does not register care homes according to the client groups, such as those suffering from dementia, which they may accommodate. CSCI will register a home as being able to care for at least one service user from a particular client group. These client groups do not include the "elderly mentally infirm". CSCI registers homes as being able to care for people with dementia, people with learning disability and people with a mental disorder—not including a learning disability or dementia.

Information on the numbers of care homes with at least one place registered to care for older people with dementia and/or mental disorder which were active in each local authority area and England on 31 March at the end of each financial year shown, that had been inspected at some point prior against the NMS for older people (though not necessarily during the year in question), has been placed in the Library.

Health Services: Crosby

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what expenditure his Department has incurred on the establishment of new health service facilities in Crosby constituency since 1997. (236691)

This information is not collected centrally. However, the Sefton Primary Care Trust is a partner in the Liverpool and Sefton Local Improvement Finance Trust scheme which has delivered six primary care centres for patients. This includes the Litherland Town Hall Health Centre which was redeveloped at a cost of £5.1 million and opened to patients in September 2005.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what capital expenditure his Department has incurred on health service projects in Crosby constituency since 1997. (236692)

The information is not available in the format requested. However, the following table shows the total expenditure on purchased additions of fixed assets by national health service body. The Department does not hold information relating to the reasons for this expenditure, or for the geographical areas in which it is spent.

£000

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Sefton Primary Care Trust

886

743

Aintree Hospitals NHS Trust

8,994

14,751

5,329

4,645

917

Royal Liverpool Children's Hospitals NHS Trust

3,898

3,885

2,852

3,790

3,781

5,848

Southport and Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust

4,740

20,302

18,702

13,279

6,790

6,498

Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Trust

2,605

6,584

14,417

20,406

8,173

8,815

Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery NHS Trust

975

1,537

3,390

1,458

1,439

3,989

Total purchased fixed assets

21,212

47,059

44,690

43,578

21,986

25,893

Notes:

1. Data are not available for foundation trusts, so the information for Aintree Hospital NHS Trust only covers the period to 31 July 2006.

2. Sefton Primary Care Trust came into existence in 2006-07, so data prior to this is not available.

3. Levels of capital expenditure vary from year to year depending on local investment decisions.

Source:

Audited summarisation schedules

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many finished consultant episodes there were in Crosby constituency in 1997; and how many there have been in 2008 to date. (236700)

The information is not available in the format requested. However, the following table shows finished consultant episodes (FCEs) at the Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sefton primary care trust (PCT), and the former Southport and Formby and South Sefton PCTs.

PCT of responsibility

Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust as a provider

Sefton PCT

Southport and Formby PCT

South Sefton PCT

2006-07

100,008

95,548

2005-06

97,945

28,118

56,691

2004-05

91,900

25,360

53,478

2003-04

86,747

26,363

52,619

2002-03

78,117

26,613

47,269

2001-02

74,542

2000-01

78,248

1999-2000

74,910

1998-99

73,596

1997-98

80,535

Notes:

1. The Southport and Formby PCT and the South Sefton PCTs merged in 2006-07 to create the Sefton PCT—these two PCTs can be added together to compare with 2006-07.

2. As a result of the merger of the Southport and Formby PCT and the South Sefton PCT, figures are provided for these PCTs from 2002-03 to 2005-06. A complex merger occurred prior to 2002-03 and it is not possible to trace which trusts should be included in order to get an accurate comparable figure.

3. Ungrossed data—figures have not been adjusted for shortfalls in data.

4. A FCE is defined as a period of admitted patient care under one consultant within one health care provider. FCEs are counted against the year in which the FCE finishes. The figures do not represent the number of patients, as a person may have more than one episode of care within the year.

5. It is also important that the PCT and trust figures are not added together, as the same FCEs may be counted under both organisations. This is because the trust data look at activity provided by the trust, whereas the PCT activity looks at activity commissioned by the PCT (which may then be provided at Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust).

6. Data Quality—HES are compiled from data sent by more than 300 NHS trusts and PCTs in England. Data are also received from a number of independent sector organisations for activity commissioned by the English NHS. The Information Centre for health and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data via HES processes. While this brings about improvement over time, some shortcomings remain.

Source:

Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), the Information Centre for health and social care.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many patients in Crosby constituency waited more than six months for treatment in 1997; and how many have done so in 2008 to date. (236701)

The information is not available at constituency level.

At quarter 4 1996-97, there were 2,946 patients waiting more than six months for treatment in the former health authority area, which includes the Crosby constituency.

During 2008, no patients within the Sefton primary care trust area have waited more than six months for treatment.

Hospitals: Admissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate his Department has made of the average length of stay in hospital of a patient in days in the last 12 months; and if he will make a statement. (235461)

The median length of stay is two days. This figure relates to 2006-07 activity in NHS hospitals in England, and activity performed in the independent sector in England which was commissioned by the NHS in England. This is the most recent year for which information is available.

Hospitals: East of England

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much has been spent by the East of England strategic health authority on improving services in hospitals to compensate for the closure of other hospitals in the region in the latest period for which figures are available. (235732)

The information requested is not held centrally. The hon. Member may therefore wish to raise this directly with NHS East of England.

Hospitals: Waiting Lists

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what estimate he has made of the cost of additional activity to meet the 18 week target for operation waiting times in each of the last four years; (237043)

(2) what estimate he has made of the likely changes in NHS (a) activity levels and (b) costs from (i) achieving and (ii) maintaining the 18 week target for operation waiting times in the next two years;

(3) if he will estimate the cost to the NHS of reducing the maximum operation waiting time to (a) 17 weeks, (b) 16 weeks, (c) 14 weeks, (d) 12 weeks and (e) eight weeks.

The 2004 comprehensive spending review provided for an extra £1,000 million and £1,900 million in 2006-07 and 2007-08 respectively for extra outpatient and inpatient activity needed to cover demand growth, existing waiting time initiatives and progress towards the 18 week waiting time target.

Achievement of the 18 week target has required the national health service to increase elective activity at a rate to meet both underlying demand and also clear the backlog of waiters. Achievement of the 18 week target will reduce the required rate of growth to just underlying activity. The Department has not made an estimate of the savings of meeting the 18 week target.

There are no current plans centrally to estimate the cost to the NHS of reducing waiting times below the existing public service agreement 18 week target agreed with HM Treasury. However, primary care trusts may set and fund local stretch targets which include further reductions in maximum waiting times in some areas.

Incontinence: Medical Equipment

To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will meet representatives of the User Group Coalition to discuss the revised proposals on Part IX of the Drug Tariff; and if he will make a statement. (234678)

In conducting the review of arrangements under part IX of the Drug Tariff for the provision of stoma and urology appliances—and related services—in primary care—departmental officials have sought the views of a wide range of interested parties, including patient representatives. The User Coalition Group has met with officials—as have individual members of the group. Unfortunately, due to diary commitments I am unable to meet the group. However, I have asked departmental officials to contact the chair of the group to organise a meeting.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment his Department has made of the likelihood of including contractors for the dispensing of intermittent catheters in the proposed new arrangements for prescription fees under Part IX of the Drug Tariff; and if he will make a statement. (235458)

The review of the arrangements under Part IX of the Drug Tariff for the provision of stoma and urology appliances—and related services—in primary care had considered all appliances listed in Part IXA (catheter related), Part IXB and Part IXC. Intermittent catheters are included in Part IXC and consequently have been part of this review.

In addition, the review is considering reimbursement for items and remuneration for services to both dispensing appliance contractors (DACs) and pharmacy contractors. If such DACs dispense intermittent catheters then they would be included in any new arrangements for the provision of stoma and urology appliances and related services in primary care under Part IX of the Drug Tariff.

Medical Treatments

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which treatments have been appraised by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; which have been (a) fully recommended, (b) partly recommended and (c) not recommended for use in the NHS; and in respect of each treatment what the (i) indication for which it was appraised and (ii) estimated annual eligible patient population is. (237026)

A summary of technology appraisal guidance published by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence is shown in the following table. Information on the estimated eligible annual population could be collated only at disproportionate cost.

NICE technology appraisals published as at October 2008

No.

Title of guidance

Date of issue

Recommendation

1

Wisdom teeth

March 2000

Partly recommended

2

Hip replacement

April 2000

Partly recommended

3

Taxanes for ovarian cancer

May 2000

Partly recommended

4

Coronary artery stents

May 2000

Partly recommended

5

Liquid-based cytology—cervical screening

June 2000

Not recommended

6

Taxanes for breast cancer

June 2000

Partly recommended

7

Proton pump inhibitors

July 2000

Partly recommended

8

Hearing aids

July 2000

Partly recommended

9

Rosiglitazone for type 2 diabetes

August 2000

Partly recommended

10

Inhaler systems for under 5s

August 2000

Recommended

11

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators

September 2000

Partly recommended

12

Glycoprotein llb/llla inhibitors

September 2000

Recommended

13

Methylphenidate for Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

October 2000

Recommended

14

Ribavirin and interferon alpha for hepatitis C

October 2000

Partly recommended

15

Zanamivir for influenza

November 2000

Partly recommended

16

Autologous cartilage transplantation in knee joints

December 2000

Not recommended

17

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

January 2001

Not recommended

18

Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia

December 2000

Partly recommended

19

Donepezil, Rivastigmine and Galantamine for Alzheimer’s disease

January 2001

Partly recommended

20

Riluzole for motor neurone disease

January 2001

Recommended

21

Pioglitazone for type 2 diabetes

March 2001

Partly recommended

22

Orlistat for obesity

March 2001

Partly recommended

23

Temozolomide for brain cancer

April 2001

Partly recommended

24

Difficult to heal surgical wounds

April 2001

Recommended

25

Gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer

May 2001

Partly recommended

26

Non-small cell lung cancer

June 2001

Recommended

27

Cox II for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

July 2001

Partly recommended

28

Topetecan for advanced ovarian cancer

August 2001

Partly recommended

29

Fludarabine for B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

September 2001

Recommended

30

Taxanes for breast cancer—review

September 2001

Partly recommended

31

Sibutramine for obesity in adults

October 2001

Recommended

32

Beta interferon and glatiramer

January 2002

Not recommended

33

Colorectal cancer

March 2002

Partly recommended

34

Tratuzumab breast cancer

March 2002

Partly recommended

35

Enteracept juvenile arthritis

March 2002

Partly recommended

36

Enteracept and infliximab rheumatoid arthritis

March 2002

Partly recommended

37

Rituximab lymphoma

March 2002

Partly recommended

38

Inhalers 5-15

March 2002

Recommended

39

Zyban and nicotine replacement therapy

March 2002

Recommended

40

Infliximab for Crohn’s disease

May 2002

Partly recommended

41

Routine anti-D rhesus negative women

May 2002

Recommended

42

Human growth hormone for children

May 2002

Recommended

43

Atypical antipsychotics

June 2002

Recommended

44

Metal on metal

June 2002

Partly recommended

45

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride (Caelyx) for ovarian cancer

July 2002

Partly recommended

46

Surgery for morbid obesity

July 2002

Partly recommended

47

Glycoproteins—review

September 2002

Recommended

48

Home vs hospital haemodialysis

September 2002

Partly recommended

49

Ultrasonic locating devices for pacing central venous lines

September 2002

Recommended

50

Imatinib for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML)

October 2002

Recommended

51

Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy

October 2002

Not recommended

52

Thrombolysis

October 2002

Recommended

53

Long acting insulin analogues (glargine)

December 2002

Partly recommended

54

Vinorelbine for breast cancer

December 2002

Partly recommended

55

Paclitaxel for ovarian cancer

January 2003

Recommended

56

Tension free vaginal tape

February 2003

Recommended

57

Subcutaneous insulin infusion (insulin pumps)

February 2003

Partly recommended

58

Zanamivir, oseltamivir and amantidine for the treatment of flu

February 2003

Partly recommended

59

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)

April 2003

Partly recommended

60

Patient education models diabetes

April 2003

Recommended

61

Capecitabine and tegafur with uracil for metastatic colorectal cancer

May 2003

Recommended

62

Capecitabine for locally advance breast cancer

May 2003

Recommended

63

Glitazones for type 2 diabetes—review

August 2003

Partly recommended

64

Human growth hormone in adults

August 2003

Partly recommended

65

Rituximab for aggressive non Hodgkin’s lymphoma

September 2003

Partly recommended

66

Olanzapine and valporate semisodium for bipolar 1 disorder

September 2003

Recommended

67

Oseltamivir and amantidine for prophylaxis of flu

September 2003

Partly recommended

68

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) for macular degeneration

September 2003

Partly recommended

69

Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical screening

October 2003

Recommended

70

Use of imatanib for chronic myeloid leukaemia

October 2003

Partly recommended

71

Use of coronary artery stents

October 2003

Partly recommended

72

Rheumatoid arthritis—anakinra

November 2003

Not recommended

73

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction

November 2003

Partly recommended

74

Pre-hospital initiation of fluid replacement therapy in trauma

January 2004

Partly recommended

75

Hepatitis C—pegylated interferons, ribavarin and alfa interferon

January 2004

Partly recommended

76

Newer drugs for epilepsy in adults

March 2004

Partly recommended

77

Newer hypnotic drugs for insomnia

April 2004

Partly recommended

78

Fluid-filled thermal balloon and microwave endometrial ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding

April 2004

Partly recommended

79

Newer drugs for epilepsy in children

April 2004

Partly recommended

80

Acute coronary syndromes—clopidogrel

July 2004

Recommended

81

Atopic dermatitis (eczema)—topical steroids

August 2004

Partly recommended

82

Atopic dermatitis (eczema)—pimecrolimus and tacrolimus

August 2004

Partly recommended

83

Hernia—laparoscopic surgery—review

September 2004

Partly recommended

84

Sepsis (severe)—drotrecogin

September 2004

Recommended

85

Renal transplantation—immunosuppressive regimens (adults)

September 2004

Partly recommended

86

Gastro-intestinal stromal tumours (GIST)—imatinib

October 2004

Partly recommended

87

Secondary osteoporosis

January 2005

Partly recommended

88

Dual-chamber pacemakers for the treatment of symptomatic bradycardia

February 2005

Partly recommended

89

Cartilage injury—autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI)—review

May 2005

Not recommended

90

Vascular disease—clopidogrel and dipyridamole

May 2005

Partly recommended

91

Ovarian cancer (advanced)—paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and topotecan—review

May 2005

Partly recommended

92

Tooth decay—Healozone

July 2005

Not recommended

93

Colorectal cancer (advanced)—irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed—review

August 2005

Partly recommended

94

Cardiovascular disease—statins

January 2006

Partly recommended

95

Arrhythmia—implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs)—review

January 2006

Partly recommended

96

Hepatitis B (chronic)—adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alpha-2a

February 2006

Partly recommended

97

Depression and anxiety—computerised cognitive behavioural therapy (CCBT)

February 2006

Partly recommended

98

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)—methylphenidate, atomoxetine and dexamfetamine—review

March 2006

Partly recommended

99

Immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplantation in children and adolescents

April 2006

Partly recommended

100

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the adjuvant treatment of stage III (Dukes’ C) colon cancer

April 2006

Recommended

101

Docetaxel for hormone refractory prostate cancer

June 2006

Recommended

102

Parent-training/education programmes in the management of children with conduct disorders

July 2006

Recommended

103

Etanercept and efalizumab for psoriasis

July 2006

Partly recommended

104

Etanercept and infliximab for psoriatic arthritis

July 2006

Partly recommended

105

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

August 2006

Recommended

106

Peginterferon alfa and ribavirin for the treatment of mild chronic hepatitis C

August 2006

Recommended

107

Trastuzumab for the adjuvant treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer

August 2006

Partly recommended

108

Breast cancer (early)—paclitaxel

September 2006

Not recommended

109

Breast cancer (early)—docetaxel

September 2006

Recommended

110

Follicular lymphoma—rituximab

September 2006

Recommended

111

Alzheimer's—donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine (review) and memantine

November 2006

Partly recommended

112

Breast cancer (early)—hormonal treatments

November 2006

Recommended

113

Diabetes (types 1 and 2)—inhaled insulin

December 2006

Partly recommended

114

Drug misuse—methadone and buprenorphine

January 2007

Recommended

115

Drug misuse—naltrexone

January 2007

Partly recommended

116

Breast cancer—gemcitabine

January 2007

Partly recommended

117

Hyperparathyroidism—cinacalcet

January 2007

Partly recommended

118

Colorectal cancer (metastatic)—bevacizumab and cetuximab

January 2007

Not recommended

119

Leukaemia (lymphocytic)—fludarabine

February 2007

Not recommended

120

Heart failure—cardiac resynchronisation

May 2007

Partly recommended

121

Glioma (newly diagnosed and high grade)—carmustine implants and temozolomide

June 2007

Partly recommended

122

Ischaemic stroke (acute)—alteplase

June 2007

Recommended

123

Smoking cessation—varenicline

July 2007

Recommended

124

Non-small cell lung cancer—pemetrexed

August 2007

Not recommended

125

Psoriatic arthritis (moderate to severe)—adalimumab

August 2007

Partly recommended

126

Rheumatoid arthritis (refractory)—rituximab

August 2007

Partly recommended

127

Multiple sclerosis—natalizumab

August 2007

Recommended

128

Haemorrhoid—stapled haemorroidopexy

September 2007

Recommended

129

Velcade—multiple myeloma

October 2007

Recommended

130

Rheumatoid arthritis—adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab

October 2007

Partly recommended

131

Asthma (in children)—corticosteroids

November 2007

Partly recommended

132

Hypercholesterolemia—ezetimibe

November 2007

Partly recommended

133

Asthma (uncontrolled)—omalizumab

November 2007

Partly recommended

134

Psoriasis—infliximab

January 2008

Partly recommended

135

Mesothelioma—pemetrexed disodium

January 2008

Partly recommended

136

Structural neuroimaging in first-episode psychosis

February 2008

Not recommended

137

Lymphoma (follicular non-Hodgkin's)—rituximab

February 2008

Recommended

138

Asthma (in adults)—corticosteroids

March 2008

Partly recommended

139

Sleep apnoea—continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

March 2008

Partly recommended

140

Colitis (ulcerative)—infliximab

April 2008

Not recommended

141

Rheumatoid arthritis (refractory)—abatacept

April 2008

Not recommended

142

Anaemia (cancer-treatment induced)—erythropoietin (alpha and beta) and darbepoetin

May 2008

Partly recommended

143

Ankylosing spondylitis—adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab

May 2008

Partly recommended

144

Obesity—rimonabant

June 2008

Partly recommended

145

Head and neck cancer—cetuximab

June 2008

Partly recommended

146

Psoriasis—adalimumab

June 2008

Partly recommended

147

Breast cancer (advanced and metastatic)—bevacizumab

June 2008

Terminated

148

Lung cancer (non-small-cell)—bevacizumab

June 2008

Terminated

149

Glioma (recurrent)—carmustine implants

June 2008

Terminated

150

Colorectal cancer (metastatic)—cetuximab

June 2008

Terminated

151

Diabetes—insulin pump therapy

July 2008

Partly recommended

152

Coronary artery disease—drug-eluting stents

July 2008

Partly recommended

153

Hepatitis B—entecavir

August 2008

Recommended

154

Hepatitis B—telbivudine

August 2008

Not recommended

155

Macular degeneration (age-related)—ranibizumab and pegaptanib

August 2008

Partly recommended

156

Pregnancy (rhesus negative women)—routine anti-D (review)

August 2008

Partly recommended

157

Venous thromboembolism—dabigatran

September 2008

Recommended

158

Influenza (prophylaxis)—amantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir

September 2008

Partly recommended

159

Pain (chronic neuropathic or ischaemic)—spinal cord stimulation

October 2008

Partly recommended

160

Osteoporosis—primary prevention

October 2008

Partly recommended

161

Osteoporosis—secondary prevention including strontium ranelate

October 2008

Partly recommended

To ask the Secretary of State for Health on what basis the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) decided on a patient population not normally exceeding 7,000 as one of the criteria for consideration of a treatment under the supplementary advice on appraising end-of-life medicines announced by NICE on 4 November 2008; and what consideration was given to applying the advice to patient populations of (a) more than and (b) fewer than 7,000. (237032)

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is currently carrying out a public consultation on supplementary advice to its appraisal committees when they are asked to appraise life-extending medicines licensed for terminal illnesses affecting small numbers of patients.

The supplementary advice has been developed independently by NICE and states that

“The population for which the medicine is indicated and licensed should not normally exceed 7,000, with the intention of including medicines for rarer cancers and other uncommon conditions, and small groups within larger populations. The reason for selecting a small population maximum figure is that it may sometimes be the case that the costs involved in developing medicines for small groups of patients need to be reflected in a higher price, at least for the first indication.”

NICE will consider the comments it receives in response to the consultation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which interventions (a) have been and (b) are being assessed by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) through its (i) Single Technology Appraisal and (ii) Multiple Technology Appraisal processes; for which indications each treatment has been assessed; what estimate has been made of the annual eligible patient population for each treatment; and in respect of each treatment on which date (A) the treatment received its product licence, (B) the treatment was referred to NICE, (C) NICE began its appraisal and (D) NICE plans to complete its appraisal. (237086)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 4 November 2008, Official Report, columns 370-76W, showing the information requested on the timings of single technology appraisals published and in development by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Information on appraisals conducted through NICE's multiple technology appraisal programme and information on the estimated eligible annual population for all appraisals could be collated only at disproportionate cost.

Mental Health Services: Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate he has made of the cost of ensuring that no child under the age of 16 years is placed in an adult mental health in-patient ward. (237035)

No estimate has been made.

The national health service has made significant progress on this issue and the latest available figures, for July to September 2008, show only five bed days for under-16s on adult psychiatric wards. This is the lowest figure since data collection started in 2005.

Mental Health Services: Standards

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what research his Department has undertaken to establish the long-term recovery levels of patients receiving private mental health care for the purposes of benchmarking. (235817)

Methadone

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people were prescribed methadone in (a) the Gloucestershire Primary Care Trust area and (b) Stroud constituency in each of the last 10 years. (235961)

The Department does not hold information on the number of patients treated with a particular drug. However we are able to provide two related sources of data covering the Gloucestershire and Stroud areas. These are the number of methadone prescriptions and the number of people receiving specialist prescribing treatment for drug misuse.

The number of items prescribed and dispensed for methadone is in the following table. This information covers the last 60 months and is based on the primary care trust (PCT) that most closely represents the area requested.

Note:

Methadone can be used to treat more than one condition—it is licensed for use in opioid dependence, as an analgesic and as a cough suppressant.

Number of prescription items (not individuals receiving prescriptions) of methadone

Financial year

Gloucestershire PCT1

2007-08

5,995

2006-07

5,559

2005-06

3,990

2004-05

3,046

1 Due to changes in PCT configuration Gloucestershire PCT comprised the following PCTs, pre 2006 changes:

Cheltenham and Tewkesbury PCT

Cotswold and Vale PCT

West Gloucestershire PCT

The National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse’s (NTA) National Drug Treatment Monitoring System (NDTMS) collects data on people in drug treatment in England.

NDTMS records numbers of people receiving specialist prescribing for drug treatment rather than the type of drug which is prescribed. Most of those in treatment receive oral methadone, but buprenorphine or other substitute opioids may also be prescribed.

The NDTMS only records data based on local authority boundaries, and only since 2004-05. The NDTMS does not break down data specifically for Stroud.

Data for the number of people receiving prescribing treatment in the Gloucestershire Primary Care Trust area, for each of the years since 2004-05 are given in the following table.

Number of individual receiving prescribing treating (including methadone) for drug misuse

Number

2004-05

865

2005-06

1,314

2006-07

1,358

2007-08

1,467

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what budget was allocated within the East of England strategic health authority to reduce MRSA in hospitals in the latest period for which figures are available. (235731)

The information requested is not held centrally. Funding to deliver reduced methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitals is made available to the national health service mostly through general primary care trust (PCT) allocations. Individual PCT allocations are not broken down into funding or budgets for specific initiatives. It is for the national health service to decide locally how best to meet the national priorities set out in the “NHS Operating Framework” (a copy of which is available in the Library), including how much funding to make available. The hon. Member may therefore wish to raise this directly with NHS East of England.

NHS: Consultants

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) with reference to the analysis of consultants’ NHS and private incomes funded by his Department what permission was sought from consultants to use this data; in what ways the data were anonymised; and how much the study cost; (232029)

(2) with reference to the analysis of consultants’ NHS and private incomes funded by his Department, what the (a) total income, (b) private income and (c) NHS income was of NHS consultants in the period analysed, broken down by (i) place of work and (ii) place of NHS employment;

(3) if he will place in the Library a copy of HM Revenue and Customs correspondence files relating to securing access to the tax return database to complete the analysis of consultants NHS and private incomes undertaken by his Department;

(4) in which regions those consultants funded by his Department and included in its analysis of consultant NHS and private income worked; and what other studies involving interrogation of consultants’ and future consultants’ tax returns he has commissioned in the last 11 years.

The following table gives national health service consultants’ average total income, average private income and average NHS income for 2003-04.

The information is presented by pre-2006 strategic health authority (SHA).

Information by place of work and place of NHS employment is not available.

Consultant earnings 2003-04

SHA

Average total income (£)

Average NHS income (£)

Average private income (£)

Number of consultants in sample

Cheshire and Merseyside

131,659

75,630

56,030

1,297

Essex

131,226

75,005

56,221

552

County Durham and Tees Valley

124,735

73,772

50,963

614

Shropshire and Staffordshire

119,291

71,384

47,907

610

North West London

118,843

73,021

45,822

1,028

Birmingham and the Black Country

116,901

72,290

44,611

1,308

Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire

118,096

74,880

43,216

545

Cumbria and Lancashire

119,013

75,464

43,549

793

Northumberland, Tyne and Wear

109,788

70,302

39,486

912

Dorset and Somerset

114,396

75,543

38,853

505

North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire

110,446

75,929

34,517

637

Thames Valley

106,074

72,987

33,087

953

Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire

106,641

74,195

32,446

964

South East London

106,266

74,400

31,866

995

Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland

110,989

78,331

32,658

617

South West Peninsula

102,429

73,827

28,602

757

North East London

111,569

81,749

29,820

711

West Midlands South

105,397

77,413

27,984

680

North Central London

106,003

77,863

28,140

1,044

Surrey and Sussex

103,711

77,426

26,285

1,172

Kent and Medway

106,769

80,011

26,758

583

West Yorkshire

102,264

77,290

24,974

1,156

South West London

98,580

74,665

23,915

704

Trent

104,591

81,995

22,596

1,082

Hampshire and Isle of Wight

102,154

81,050

21,104

818

Greater Manchester

102,399

81,801

20,598

1,468

Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire

102,254

81,694

20,560

1,093

South Yorkshire

101,578

81,400

20,178

809

Notes:

1. Source: The Table is taken from the article: “Analysis of consultants’ NHS and private income in England 2003-04”—Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2008.

2. The income variables used were from employment income (assumed to be NHS income) and self-employment income (assumed to be income from private medical practice).

The table also shows the regions in which these consultants worked.

In summer 2006, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) statisticians created an anonymised statistical dataset for research into the staff market forces factor (MFF) used in NHS resource allocation. The dataset was created by linking selected variables supplied by NHS Information Centre for health and social care from the 2003 NHS Medical and Dental Workforce Census with three income variables derived from HMRC records: total employment income, total self-employment income and the sum of these two variables. Any variables used to link the data were removed prior to access by the academic researcher contracted by Department. This deliberately partial data set contained only the information required by the researcher to carry out the statistical (regression) analysis used in the review of the MFF.

The researcher had access to only this anonymised, statistical dataset. The statistical analyses were undertaken on HMRC premises. Having signed appropriate confidentiality undertakings, the researcher was allowed supervised access to the dataset in an isolated environment with no connection to either HMRC networks and administrative data systems or to external sites via internet or e-mail. HMRC reviewed all statistical output compiled by the researcher and released only aggregate non-disclosive summaries. No outputs based on single or small number of records were released. The smallest sample count in the published report was 30. This is well within the guidelines for dissemination of statistics in National Statistics protocols. The researcher was not allowed to return to the dataset once the agreed analysis had been completed.

As will be clear from the table, it was impossible to link records in the statistical dataset with any data relating to an identifiable individual, so no permission was sought from NHS consultants for this research to take place.

The total cost of the contract for research into the staff MFF was £75,000. The analysis of private sector earnings of NHS consultants was a relatively small, but influential part of the review of the MFF. The final research report on the review of the staff MFF will be made available on the Department of Health website alongside the PCT revenue allocations, to be announced at the time of the Operating Framework for the NHS later this year.

The correspondence files relating to securing access to the tax return data base do not exist, since no one was given access to a data base of tax returns. The process that was followed to give access to an anonymised data set is as described.

In the last 11 years, HMRC has conducted surveys into consultants’ earnings on behalf of the Department of Health for tax years 1998-99 to 2004-05 inclusive, using data from HMRC records. No outputs from this work have been provided to non-HM Revenue and Customs personnel in either pseudo-anonymised or non-anonymised form. HMRC released only anonymised outputs to the Department of Health or to the NHS Information Centre for health and Social care.

In addition, at the request of the Department for 2003-04 only, HMRC created an anonymised statistical dataset relating to consultants’ earnings. It contained only the pre-arranged data items for a sample of 24,407 cases that were necessary to enable researchers acting on behalf of the Department of Health to undertake statistical analysis. The researchers were allowed supervised access to the dataset on HMRC premises. HMRC reviewed the outputs from the statistical analysis to ensure that only non-disclosive summary and aggregate statistics were compiled and used in the report.

NHS: Improving Access to Medicines

To ask the Secretary of State for Health with reference to paragraph 5.12 of the report to his Department on improving access to NHS medicines by Professor Mike Richards CBE, how his Department plans to encourage primary care trusts to work together to make proactive commissioning decisions. (235619)

On 4 November, the Secretary of State accepted this recommendation and the national health service chief executive wrote to all strategic health authority (SHA) chief executives to ask them to review, by April 2009, the way in which primary care trusts in their area collaborate to support effective decision-making on new drugs.

All SHAs are now taking forward this piece of work in their local areas.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when he plans to implement Recommendation 3 of improving access to medicines for NHS patients. (237062)

We will publish in the new year a set of core principles to inform the way in which primary care trusts make decisions about funding new drugs, followed by detailed good practice guidance for the national health service.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what timetable he has set for implementing Recommendation 6 of improving access to medicines for NHS patients; whether he plans to publish the results of the work; and if he will make a statement. (237081)

The Secretary of State has asked Professor Mike Richards to take forward this piece of work, with a view to making the results public at the end of 2009.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to his Statement of 4 November 2008, Official Report, columns 131-33, on NHS patients: access to medicines, which drugs he will refer back to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence for re-appraisal. (237097)

We have no plans to refer any drugs or treatments back to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) for reappraisal. NICE already has a system in place for periodically reviewing those appraisals it has published.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the Statement of 4 November 2008, Official Report, columns 131-33, on NHS patients: access to medicines, what steps he expects the NHS trust to take with regard to the funding of any treatment needed as a result of complications in circumstances where it is not possible to identify whether complications have resulted from a patient’s private or NHS treatment. (235729)

The draft revised guidance published by the Department on 4 November is clear that, where patients pay for additional, private treatment, the national health service should not be expected to meet any predictable costs resulting from the private element of care. Copies of the guidance have already been placed in the Library.

However, in circumstances where it is not possible to identify whether complications have resulted from a patient’s private or NHS treatment, or in an emergency, patients should, of course, be entitled to NHS care.

NHS: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many full-time equivalent staff work at (a) the NHS Blood and Transplant Authority, (b) NHS Professionals, (c) the Commission for Social Care Inspection, (d) the General Social Care Council, (e) the Healthcare Commission, (f) the Appointments Commission, (g) the Mental Health Act Commission, (h) the Social Care Institute for Excellence, (i) the Hepatitis Advisory Group, (j) the AIDS Expert Advisory Group and (k) the Healthcare Regulatory Council. (233287)

The information requested is as follows:

Number

Arm's Length Bodies

NHS Blood and Transplant

15,579.86

NHS Professionals

1272.32

Commission for Social Care Inspection

11,541.20

General Social Care Council

1200.60

Healthcare Commission

1867.00

Appointments Commission

144.75

Mental Health Act Commission

141.00

Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence

116.00

Charities

Social Care Institute for Excellence

168.00

Advisory Non-Departmental Public Bodies

Neither of these bodies employ staff.

Hepatitis Advisory Group

AIDS Expert Advisory Group

1 Whole-time equivalent.

NHS: Private Sector

To ask the Secretary of State for Health with reference to paragraph 11 of his Department’s equality impact assessment on NHS patients who wish to pay for additional private care, which private treatments currently unavailable will be made available on the NHS. (235608)

The future use of specific interventions within the national health service will depend on a variety of factors, including recommendations made by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health with reference to paragraph 9.6 of his Department’s consultation document on Guidance on NHS patients who wish to pay for additional private care, what his Department’s definition is of unreasonable profit. (235617)

The draft revised guidance the Department published on 4 November sets out the clear principles that should be applied to every situation where a national health service patient chooses to purchase additional care privately.

One of these principles is that the NHS should not be seen to be profiting unreasonably from patients in these circumstances.

The Department does not consider it sensible to try to define this at a national level and the Government do not set prices for private healthcare. Instead, the principle set out in the guidance sets a clear expectation to all NHS organisations that any charges they make in their capacity as providers of private care must be reasonable and justifiable. It is then for NHS organisations to apply this principle locally, in line with their particular local circumstances.

A copy of the guidance has already been placed in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what his policy is on whether patients will have to pay for the full cost of the NHS element if they wish to proceed with the private element in cases where it is impossible to separate a private element of a patient’s treatment from an NHS-provided element. (235618)

The draft revised guidance, published by the Department of Health on 4 November, sets out clearly the principles that should apply in circumstances where patients wish to purchase additional, private care. It says that:

“As overriding rules, it is essential that:

the NHS should never subsidise private care with public money, which would breach core NHS principles; and

patients should never be charged for their NHS care, which would contravene the founding principles and legislation of the NHS."

The guidance goes on to say that,

“in order to ensure that there is no risk of the NHS subsidising private care:

It should always be clear whether an individual procedure or treatment is privately funded or NHS funded.

Private and NHS care should be kept as clearly separate as possible.

Private care should be carried out at a different time and place. A different place would include the facilities of a private health care provider, or part of an NHS organisation which has been designated for private care, including amenity beds.

This guidance applies to additional private health care that patients receive over and above their NHS care. It does not permit a “pick and mix” approach where patients can pay to upgrade any individual elements of their NHS care.”

The guidance has already been placed in the Library.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the Statement of 4 November 2008, Official Report, columns 131-33, on NHS patients: access to medicines, how many patients he expects will take up the right to purchase separate private care in each of the next three years. (235730)

The measures announced by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State on 4 November will improve access to drugs for national health service patients, reducing the number of patients likely to purchase additional care privately. The Department does not have sufficient data to estimate patient numbers reliably.

However, the Secretary of State accepted Professor Mike Richards’s recommendation that the Department should commission a national audit of demand for unfunded drugs. The Secretary of State has asked Professor Richards to lead this work.

Nurses: Maternity Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many registered neonatal nurses he estimates will be required in neonatal intensive care units in (a) Wandsworth and (b) London in (i) 2009, (ii) 2010 and (iii) 2011. (237298)

It is for local national health service organisations to analyse their local work force needs and develop plans, in liaison with commissioners, providers and service users, to deliver high quality, safe services and take action to secure the appropriate staff and skills to deliver these services.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many registered neonatal nurses there are in (a) Wandsworth and (b) London. (237299)

Neonatal nurses are not currently identifiable within the NHS census data collected by the Information Centre for health and social care. The number of qualified paediatric nurses in the London strategic health authority area, Kingston Hospital NHS Trust, and St. George's Healthcare NHS Trust can be found in the following table.

NHS hospital and community health services: Qualified paediatric nurses in the London strategic health authority area and each specified organisation as at 30 September 2007

Headcount

London strategic health authority area

4,164

Of which:

Kingston Hospital NHS Trust

70

St. George's Healthcare NHS Trust

146

Note:

Data quality: Work force statistics are compiled from data sent by more than 300 NHS trusts and primary care trusts (PCTs) in England. The NHS Information Centre for health and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid data. Processing methods and procedures are continually being updated to improve data quality. Where this happens any impact on figures already published will be assessed but unless this is significant at national level they will not be changed. Where there is impact only at detailed or local level this will be footnoted in relevant analyses.

Source:

The NHS Information Centre for health and social care Non-Medical Workforce Census.

Obesity

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what information he holds on the number of children who have been estimated to be obese or seriously overweight in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available; and how many teenagers have been diagnosed with diabetes in each such year. (235823)

Information on the percentage of children aged two to 15 who are overweight or obese in each of the last 10 years is available from the “Health Survey for England 2006 Latest trends: Children trend tables 2006” published on 31 January 2008. The information can be found on table 4. This publication has already been placed in the Library.

Further information on the percentage of children who are overweight or obese is also available for the year 2006-07 for those in school year reception (aged four to five) and year 6 (aged 10 to 11) from the National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP). This information is available in the “National Child Measurement Programme: 2006/07 school year, headline results” published on 21 February 2008. The prevalence of obese children can be found in table 1 (page 3). This publication has already been placed in the Library.

Information on the number of teenagers diagnosed with diabetes in each of the last 10 years is not available.

Patient Choice Schemes

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which primary care trusts use NHS Direct as their Choose and Book appointments line. (236955)

All primary care trusts have the facility to use the Choose and Book appointments line run by NHS Direct on behalf of the national health service.

While the vast majority of primary care trusts use this service for all of their calls, five primary care trusts have taken the operational decision to only use it for out of hours services between the period 07.00 to 09.00 and 17.00 to 22.00 hours Monday to Friday and 07.00 to 22.00 on a Saturday, Sunday and bank holidays.

Where primary care trusts take the decision to organise their own service outside of the nationally provided arrangement, the service is funded locally by the primary care trust.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the average cost per call to the NHS Direct National Choose and Book appointments line was in each of the last three years; and how much income the service generated in each year. (237164)

The Department does not collect information on the cost incurred by individual patients calling the national 0845 608 8888 number. The actual cost incurred by patients will vary depending on whether a patient calls from a landline or mobile and what cost tariff they are on with the phone service provider. The National Choose and Book Appointment Line do not generate any income from patient calls made to the service.

Patients can also book their appointment, free of charge, either via the internet or in their general practitioner (GP) surgery at the time of their referral by the GP.

The cost to NHS Direct of providing the National Choose and Book Appointment Line service is paid for from national health service financial resources.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health in what proportion of appointments booked via the NHS Direct National Choose and Book appointments line a hard copy confirmation of the booking was posted to the patient within two days in each of the last 36 months. (237165)

The NHS Direct choose and book appointments line are not responsible for posting a hard copy confirmation of a patient's booking. Details of a patient's appointment are conveyed over the telephone when patients choose to book their appointment in this way, with clinical details about a patient's appointment sent by the provider of their choice who in most cases will send the patient a hard copy confirmation of their booking.

Prescriptions

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what percentage of prescription items were dispensed to patients as repeat prescriptions in (a) Vale of York constituency and (b) England in the last three years. (233208)

The Department does not hold the information regarding the percentage of prescriptions which are issued as repeat prescriptions.

Quality Adjusted Life Year

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment he has made of the progress on the research commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) from the National Institute for Health Research to consider public opinion on NICE's use of the Quality Adjusted Life Year as a basis for its recommendations. (234674)

We have made no such assessment. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is an independent organisation and is responsible for considering the impact of research on its methods and processes.

NICE commissioned the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) to conduct two pieces of research into the use of the Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). The ‘What is the value to society of a QALY?’ report was published in July 2008 and ‘The relative societal value of health gains to different beneficiaries’ report was published in August 2008.

Sight Impaired

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many registered blind people there are, broken down by (a) region and (b) constituency; and if he will make a statement. (235925)

Data on the number of registered blind and partially sighted people are not collected centrally by constituency but are available for councils with adult social services responsibilities and Government office regions.

Information collected 31 March 2008, shows that 153,000 people were on the register of blind people, a slight increase of around 500 (0.3 per cent.) from March 2006 although there were 10,200 new registrations to the register of blind people, a fall of 5 per cent. compared to 2006.

The following table shows the number of blind and partially sighted people registered with councils with adult social services responsibilities in England.

Number of blind and partially sighted people registered with councils with adult social services responsibilities in England as at 31 March 2008

Rounded numbers

Total number of people (all ages) registered as:

Blind

Partially sighted

England

152,980

156,285

North East

6,785

8,310

Durham

1,475

1,805

Northumberland

720

840

Darlington

250

320

Hartlepool

220

190

Middlesbrough

290

475

Redcar and Cleveland

250

460

Stockton-on-Tees

365

530

Gateshead

505

710

Newcastle-upon-Tyne

810

840

North Tyneside

635

675

South Tyneside

450

480

Sunderland

805

990

North West

22,550

24,675

Cheshire

1,995

2,000

Cumbria

1,350

1,555

Lancashire

3,540

4,540

Blackburn with Darwen

530

835

Blackpool

565

870

Halton

255

360

Warrington

435

580

Bolton

750

1,020

Bury

865

750

Knowsley

455

560

Liverpool

1,195

1,120

Manchester

1,890

1,770

Oldham

870

775

Rochdale

1,525

835

Salford

1,025

1,065

Sefton

1,025

975

St Helens

335

565

Stockport

620

885

Tameside

665

580

Trafford

825

725

Wigan

675

1,005

Wirral

1,155

1,320

Yorkshire and the Humber

17,150

17,935

North Yorkshire

1,780

1,905

East Riding

1,055

1,125

Kingston-upon-Hull

735

705

NE Lincolnshire

425

355

North Lincolnshire

600

385

York

430

555

Barnsley

1,810

1,220

Bradford

1,670

1,725

Calderdale

480

465

Doncaster

760

1,225

Kirklees

785

670

Leeds

2,780

2,460

Rotherham

860

1,360

Sheffield

1,730

1,890

Wakefield

1,250

1,895

East Midlands

13,120

14,700

Derbyshire

3,040

3,070

Leicestershire

1,520

1,980

Lincolnshire

1,990

2,450

Northamptonshire

1,705

1,285

Nottinghamshire

1,830

2,820

Derby

995

590

Leicester

1,035

1,135

Nottingham

915

1265

Rutland

85

100

West Midlands

15,975

16,215

Shropshire

695

650

Staffordshire

2,085

1,930

Warwickshire

1,335

1,600

Worcestershire

1,125

1,205

Herefordshire

780

1,385

Stoke-on-Trent

750

640

Telford and Wrekin

305

390

Birmingham

4,690

3,965

Coventry

665

805

Dudley

800

810

Sandwell

850

805

Solihull

510

420

Walsall

700

825

Wolverhampton

690

785

South West

15,145

14,855

Cornwall

1,700

1,760

Devon

2,075

2,080

Dorset

1,260

1,365

Gloucestershire

1,530

1,885

Isles of Scilly

10

Somerset

1,560

1,275

Wiltshire

1,455

1,285

Bath and NE Somerset

540

535

Bournemouth

845

670

Bristol

930

1,025

North Somerset

670

635

Plymouth

640

570

Poole

645

635

South Gloucestershire

505

385

Swindon

305

285

Torbay

480

460

Eastern

15,110

14,740

Bedfordshire

665

680

Cambridgeshire

1,595

1,105

Essex

3,215

3,485

Hertfordshire

3,100

3,055

Norfolk

2,600

2,330

Suffolk

2,210

2,185

Luton

555

430

Peterborough

500

480

Southend

440

670

Thurrock

225

320

London

21,650

17,665

Camden

665

640

Greenwich

465

600

Hackney

590

450

Hammersmith and Fulham

520

330

Islington

680

600

Kensington and Chelsea

585

355

Lambeth

840

160

Lewisham

660

450

Southwark

750

520

Tower Hamlets

395

430

Wandsworth

785

630

Westminster

810

540

City of London

10

20

Barking and Dagenham

345

395

Barnet

950

905

Bexley

390

450

Brent

1,380

935

Bromley

955

1,020

Croydon

955

745

Ealing

970

650

Enfield

565

500

Haringey

915

685

Harrow

630

530

Havering

365

510

Hillingdon

645

730

Hounslow

750

710

Kingston-upon-Thames

345

260

Merton

590

515

Newham

965

610

Redbridge

915

830

Richmond-upon-Thames

370

270

Sutton

595

535

Waltham Forest

305

160

South East

25,495

27,190

Buckinghamshire

980

1,105

East Sussex

2,365

2,280

Hampshire

3,340

4,730

Kent

4,955

6,410

Oxfordshire

2,105

1,820

Surrey

2,455

1,840

West Sussex

4,000

3,945

Bracknell Forest

215

180

Brighton and Hove

900

645

Isle of Wight

365

470

Medway Towns

405

545

Milton Keynes

555

445

Portsmouth

505

430

Reading

480

490

Slough

285

205

Southampton

605

690

West Berkshire

325

370

Windsor and Maidenhead

370

320

Wokingham

285

270

Notes:

1. ‘—’ = 6 or less (or less than 50 for national and regional totals)

2. Figures may not add up because of rounding.

Source:

National figures are actual figures from 150 SSDA902 forms.

Sugar

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment he has made of the health effects of a significant reduction in the sugar content of soft drinks. (235819)

Current United Kingdom dietary recommendations for maximal levels of sugar intake are based on a review of the evidence carried out by the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy (COMA) in 1991, and are in line with a more recent review by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2003. The Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition, which now advises the Government on nutrition issues, are about to embark on a review of the evidence on carbohydrates and health, including sugars and sources of sugar. As a result, dietary advice and any recommendations on specific foods will be amended accordingly.

To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what meetings officials of (a) his Department and (b) the Food Standards Agency have had with representatives of food and soft drink manufacturers on the reduction of added sugar levels in food products in the last 12 months; what good practice case studies his Department has identified as suitable for promotion to manufacturers; and what steps he plans to take further to encourage manufacturers to reduce the calorific content of food products; (235820)

(2) what steps the Food Standards Agency is taking to encourage major retailers to reduce the sugar content of their own brand food and beverage products;

(3) what targets the Food Standards Agency has set for the substitution of extrinsic sugars by low calorie sweeteners in (a) food and (b) beverages; what progress has been made towards those targets; what assessment he has made of the public health benefits which will arise as a result of future progress towards those targets; and if he will make a statement.

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) has lead responsibility for taking forward the work with industry to reduce consumption of, and levels of, sugar in food, including drinks with added sugar, as laid down in the cross-Government obesity strategy “Healthy Weight Healthy Lives”.

As part of this initiative, the FSA is meeting with food industry representatives, including the major retailers and their suppliers, to pursue reductions in sugar to soft drinks. It has met with representatives of the soft drinks industry on four occasions over the past 12 months—one soft drinks industry meeting and individual meetings with Britvic (twice) and Coca Cola Bottlers (Ulster). In these discussions, examples of sugar reductions achieved have been reported by Britvic, Coca Cola and GlaxoSmithKline in some of their branded ranges. Departmental officials have not met with industry to discuss sugar reduction specifically.

The FSA is developing aspirational targets for reductions in added sugar and saturated fat in a range of key contributing food products as part of its Saturated Fat and Energy Intake Programme.

Sugar reductions in soft drinks are being encouraged by the FSA while maintaining taste, quality and consumer acceptability. Specific targets for the substitution of sugar with sweeteners have not been set.

Surgery

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate his Department has made of the average (a) length of hospital stay of an invasive surgery patient and (b) cost per day for an invasive surgery patient to stay in hospital in the last 12 months; and if he will make a statement. (235459)

It is not possible to provide an estimate of the average cost per day, as the data collected as part of the annual NHS reference cost collection include all costs associated with treatment and service provision, and not just the cost of the stay in hospital.

It is not possible to provide an estimate of the average length of stay, as specific data relating to the average length of stay for invasive surgery patients are not collected centrally.

Wines: Hazardous Substances

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what checks are in place to ensure that wine sold in the UK does not contain harmful levels of metals such as lead, zinc and copper; and if he will make a statement. (237005)

Food Authorities and the Food Standards Agency wine standards inspectors as part of their routine enforcement work carry out checks including sampling on wine sold within the United Kingdom to ensure that the wine complies with relevant wine-sector and food safety legislation.

Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform

BT: Public Telephones

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what recent representations he has received on BT’s public service obligation on the provision of public pay phones. (233618)

BERR officials have received correspondence from a number of local authorities on BT’s national rationalisation programme. Under Office of Communications (Ofcom) guidelines, unitary authority consent is required before BT can remove a payphone where there is not another payphone located within 400 m and BT has therefore been consulting with local authorities across England, Wales and Scotland on proposals to remove low-usage payphones in their area. Ofcom is aware of BT’s plans and BT are adhering to its guidelines for payphone removals. Further details on Ofcom’s guidelines is available from their website at:

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/uso/uso_statement/uso_plain_english/

Departmental Conditions of Employment

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what percentage of employees in his Department (a) are on a flexible working contract, (b) are on a job share employment contract and (c) work from home for more than four hours per week. (233825)

The Department considers flexible working opportunities are a key part of a healthy and productive working environment.

Flexible working options available include a range of working patterns that can be requested by all staff and can help individuals gain a work-life balance. These include home-working, flexi-time, part-time working, job share, compressed hours, and annualised or term-time working.

Guidance, available to all staff and managers, contains best practice hints and tips for flexible workers and managers, specific guidance on skills and how to manage work and performance.

Currently 56 per cent of staff in the Department report that they work flexibly.

Departmental Internet

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what the cost of maintaining the Departmental website for the 2007-08 financial year is; and what forecast has been made of the cost of maintaining websites within his responsibility for the 2008-09 financial year. (231379)

The main cost elements of the upkeep of the Department's website are:

The Rhythmyx content management system (CMS). The CMS is used by staff across the Department and cost £1,029,474.83 in 2007-08. The forecast cost for 2008-9 is £1,180,000.

Provision and maintenance of the site's search engine facility by a third-party supplier, Open Objects. In 2007-08 this cost £15,784.2. The forecast cost for 2008-9 is £25,000.

Postal Services: Liverpool

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what his assessment is of the impact of Royal Mail's proposal to close the sorting office at Copperas Hill, Liverpool on employment in the city; and if he will make a statement. (237302)

Decisions relating to operational matters, which include decisions on the restructuring of Royal Mail's sorting office operations, are the direct responsibility of the company's management.

Given that volumes of mail are falling due to the upsurge in the use of digital media for communications, it is important that Royal Mail structures its operations as efficiently as possible so that it can compete in a liberalised market, while continuing to maintain the universal postal service at affordable prices.

Regulation: Departmental Coordination

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what guidance his Department has given to other Government Departments, agencies and non-departmental public bodies on their obligations under the Code of Practice on Guidance on Regulation. (233543)

Guidance on how to comply with the obligations under the code is contained in a Guide to the Code of Practice on Guidance, published alongside the code of practice. The guide is available at:

http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file46951.pdf

The Anderson Review of Guidance was announced in the Enterprise White Paper in April 2008 and will report at the end of November. The review will make a series of further recommendations on how to improve guidance for business.

Work and Pensions

Bereavement Benefits: Publications

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions for what reasons leaflet D49 on bereavement benefits has been withdrawn; and what plans he has to publish a replacement for it. (235471)

[holding answer 13 November 2008]: Leaflet D49 (titled “What to do after a death in England and Wales”) was published in April 2006. A review of the leaflet earlier in 2008 raised a risk that some of the details in the leaflet were now inaccurate, and could mislead citizens if the title remained in circulation.

More recent versions of the information within D49 continue to be available on several government websites, and can be printed locally by the individual or on their behalf, during the brief period while a replacement to D49 is prepared.

The replacement to D49 is currently being agreed by senior policy officials from four different Government Departments responsible for registrars, coroners, probate and benefits. It is expected that the replacement leaflet DWP1027 will be published in December 2008.

To ensure that citizens are aware of their entitlement to bereavement benefits, an interim factsheet has also been produced to fill the gap until the replacement leaflet is published. The factsheet is available online, and has been made available to registrars and coroners offices across Great Britain for them to issue as appropriate.

Child Support Agency: Complaints

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many complaints about the Child Support Agency were received by the Independent Case Examiner in each of the last three years; and how many cases accepted by the Examiner have taken (a) more than six months, (b) more than nine months and (c) 12 months or more to reach a conclusion. (235889)

The Independent Case Examiner’s office does not hold all the information in the format requested. Such information as is available is in the table.

Number of complaints received about the Child Support Agency

Average case clearance in weeks for cases accepted

2005-06

3,187

22.46

2006-07

3,927

18.86

2007-08

3,860

21.21

Children: Maintenance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what his estimate is of the number of children who would be lifted from both (a) absolute and (b) relative poverty should all non-resident parents pay child maintenance; and if he will make a statement. (233097)

[holding answer 4 November 2008]: The receipt of child maintenance payments currently helps to lift around 100,000 children out of relative poverty.

We estimate that, under the current system of child maintenance, if all non-resident parents with a positive maintenance liability paid their child maintenance this would lift around 100,000 more children out of relative poverty.

Estimates of the impact on absolute poverty if all non-resident parents paid child maintenance are not available.

Notes:

1. Number of children lifted out of poverty is defined as the number of children in households lifted above 60 per cent. of equivalised median household income before housing costs after the receipt of child maintenance payments.

2. Estimates are based on analysis of 2006-07 Family Resources Survey and are rounded to the nearest 100,000.

Council Tax

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people received council tax benefit in (a) North Yorkshire and (b) the Vale of York constituency in each year since 1997. (237120)

Information is not available at parliamentary constituency level. Information is available for North Yorkshire for benefit units comprising single people and couples.

The following table provides the number of benefit units receiving council tax benefit in each year since 1997.

North Yorkshire

Number

1997

35,330

1998

32,940

1999

32,900

2000

30,890

2001

30,980

2002

30,070

2003

30,260

2004

33,280

2005

33,830

2006

35,160

2007

35,440

Notes:

1. Data refer to benefit units, which may be a single person or a couple.

2. The figures have been rounded to the nearest 10.

3. Figures for any non-responding authorities have been estimated.

4. Council tax benefit totals exclude any second adult rebate cases.

Source:

Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit Management Information System Quarterly 100 per cent. case load stock-count taken in May 1997 to May 2007.

Jobseeker's allowance (income-based) are published in the report “Income Related Benefits Estimates of Take-Up in 2006-07”. Estimates of the number of people eligible for the additional amount for carers in pension credit are not available.

The number of people in receipt of pension credit and carer’s allowance over the last five years is shown in table 1 and all pension credit expenditure on recipients entitled to the extra amount for carers is shown in table 2.

Table 1: Pension credit and carer’s allowance

Pension credit

As at February each year

Carer’s allowance

Total pension credit recipients

Recipients with the additional amount for caring

2004

656,310

2,282,300

95,200

2005

721,610

2,654,670

153,810

2006

777,910

2,709,220

187,830

2007

823,820

2,730,940

215,050

2008

872,080

2,723,140

237,700

Notes:

1. Carer’s allowance figures include those people who are entitled to carer’s allowance but who do not receive a payment as a result of the overlapping benefit rules.

2. Case load figures are rounded to the nearest 10.

3. Pension credit recipients are people who claim pension credit either for themselves only or on behalf of a household.

4. From February 2005, estimates are derived from Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study 100 per cent. data. Prior to this, information on receipt of carer’s addition in pension credit is not available from the same source, so estimates are derived from 5 per cent. Sample data.

Source:

DWP Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study.

Table 2: Pension credit expenditure

£ million

Expenditure in cash terms

Expenditure in 2008-09 prices

2003-041

143

164

2004-05

447

500

2005-06

593

649

2006-07

717

762

2007-08

856

881

1 Part year.

Source:

DWP Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study 100 per cent. data, 5 per cent. sample data and DWP accounting systems.

Council Tax: Crosby

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people he estimates were (a) eligible for and (b) in receipt of council tax benefit in Crosby constituency in each year since 1997. (236608)

The information is not available in the format requested.

The latest estimates of the number of entitled non-recipients of means-tested benefit in Great Britain are published in the report ‘Income Related Benefits Estimates of Take-Up in 2006-07’, copies of which are available in the Library. The report includes information about council tax benefit, income support, pension credit, housing benefit and jobseeker's allowance (income based).

Estimates of eligibility are not available below the level of Great Britain.

Information for recipients of council tax benefit is not available at constituency level.

Departmental Buildings

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Rochford and Southend East (James Duddridge) of 6 October 2008, Official Report, column 59W, on departmental buildings, what the cost of each refurbishment was. (233387)

Details of the costs associated with all completed refurbishments, as provided in the reply of 6 October 2008, Official Report, column 59W, will be placed in the Library.

Departmental Land

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much surplus land (a) his Department and (b) its agencies own; and what the (i) area and (ii) estimated monetary value of each site is. (236425)

Departmental Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many and what proportion of the headcount reduction in his Department in each year since 2004 were (a) redeployed within his Department including its business units, (b) redeployed elsewhere within the Civil Service, including the names of the destination departments and (c) placed on his Department's employment register. (219496)

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

From March 2004 to March 2008 staffing in the Department was reduced by 31,101 full-time equivalent posts. During this period a number of staff were declared surplus. The number of surplus staff who were redeployed internally or to other Government Departments together with the relative proportions to the reduction (where information is held) is shown in the following table.

Surplus staff redeployed within DWP

Proportion of reduction in staffing(percentage)

Surplus staff who transferred to other Departments

Proportion of reduction in staffing(percentage)

2004-05

Information not held.

n/a

Information not held

n/a

2005-06

1,896

30

254

4

2006-07

2,830

45

147

2

2007-08

1,881

30

182

3

Total

6,607

35

583

3

Note:

Proportions are approximate as headcount reductions were measured on a full-time equivalent basis and surplus/redeployments on an individual member of staff basis.

Over the same period 3,272 staff, who had not been declared surplus, also voluntarily transferred to other Departments. A breakdown for each year is shown in the following table:

Staff transferring to other Government Department

Proportion of reduction in staffing

(percentage)

2004-05

1,128

11

2005-06

826

13

2006-07

618

10

2007-08

700

11

Total

3,272

11

Note:

Proportions are approximate as headcount reductions were measured on a full-time equivalent basis and surplus-redeployments on an individual member of staff member.

Only limited information is available on the Department to which all transferees moved to during the period. The available information is summarised in the following table:

Department

Number of staff transferring from DWP

Home Office

435

Ministry of Justice

137

Department for Transport

116

Ministry of Defence

68

Department for Trade and Industry

64

Scottish Executive

64

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

62

HM Revenue and Customs

55

Department of Health

39

HM Treasury and Treasury Solicitor

36

Department for Education and Skills

34

HM Land Registry

31

Crown Prosecution Service

27

Department for Communities and Local Government

21

Cabinet Office

20

Health and Safety Executive

10

Others

75

Total

1,294

Note.

Departmental names shown as at the time staff member transferred.

In addition to normal resignations and retirements over the four year period, 8,370 staff left the Department on a voluntary basis under early release schemes. Of these no member of staff was required to leave the Department against their will.

No personnel records are kept on whether or not staff who leave the Department join the employment register.

Departmental Official Visits

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much was spent on overnight accommodation by his Department’s civil servants in the last 12 months. (228786)

During the 12 months from September 2007 to August 2008 the Department employed an average of 114,000 staff.

The total spent on overnight accommodation for staff in that period was £12.4 million.

Departmental Postal Services

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what steps his Department has taken to monitor the cost of its mail services in the last 12 months. (221486)

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

The Department for Work and Pensions proactively monitors and manages the cost of its mail services to ensure best value for money from the utilisation of public funds. Over the past 12 months, the Department has continued to work closely with Royal Mail to make improved use of new postal products/services (e.g. introducing Packet post and Clean Mail advance services to DWP sites). Since the introduction of online business accounts by Royal Mail in September 2007, the Department has used this service extensively to obtain clearer visibility of management information on the postal spend across the DWP network.

The Department has made use of liberalisation within the postal market place for down stream access from our two service delivery centres with our provider UK Mail. The Department will continue to monitor the developing postal market place, and maximise the use of pan-Government opportunities to maximise costs and efficiencies for business delivery and taxpayers.

Departmental Public Participation

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what (a) reviews and (b) public consultations have been initiated by his Department since 27 June 2007. (221363)

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

Information on the number of reviews that the Department and its agencies have undertaken since 27 June 2007 is not held centrally. However, the Department for Work and Pensions constantly keeps under review its regulation, policy and operations.

Current and closed public consultations are set out in the following table.

Date

Title

21 July 2008

No one written off: reforming welfare to reward responsibility

5 June 2008

Pension risk sharing consultation paper - June 2008

29 May 2008

The Pension Sharing (Pension Credit Benefit) (Amendment) Regulations 2008

28 May 2008

The Pension Protection Fund (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No 2) Regulations 2008

12 May 2008

Launch of public debate on the future of care and support.

25 April 2008

The powers of the Pensions Regulator—Amendments to the anti-avoidance measures in the Pensions Act 2004

31 March 2008

Updating the Myners principles: a consultation

27 March 2008

Financial Assistance Scheme (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2008

6 March 2008

Financial Assistance Scheme (Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 2008

6 March 2008

Revision of the annuity factors employed by the Financial Assistance Scheme

3 March 2008

Independent Living Strategy Consultation

19 December 2007

The Pension Protection Fund (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2008

10 December 2007

Pensions: Contracting Out - Self Invested Personal Pensions and Other changes

6 December 2007

Consultation on pension levies-related regulations

3 December 2007

Improving specialist disability employment services

25 October 2007

The Occupational Pension Schemes (Internal Dispute Resolution Procedures Consequential and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2008

22 October 2007

Consultation on the Government response to the independent report on the deregulatory review of private pensions

16 October 2007

The Occupational Pension Schemes (Non-European Schemes Exemption) Regulations 2007

10 October 2007

Consultation on the success of the Occupational Pension Schemes (Cross-border activities) Regulations 2005 in implementing the cross-border provisions of Directive 2003/41

1 October 2007

Flexible Retirement and Pension Provision

29 August 2007

Financial Assistance Scheme (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2007

8 August 2007

The Merger of the Health and Safety Commission and the Health and Safety Executive

7 August 2007

Amendments to the Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt) Regulations 2005 Draft regulations showing track changes Impact assessment—Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt) Definition of employment cessation event

31 July 2007

The Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (EEA States) Regulations 2007

18 July 2007

In work, better off: next steps to full employment

6 July 2007

Approaches to the Calculations of Pensions Transfer Values

Source

Department for Work and Pensions' website

Disability Living Allowance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of the number of people who received (a) disability living allowance higher rate mobility component and (b) war pensioners’ mobility component in the latest period for which figures are available; and how many vehicle excise duty exemptions were made for each group. (220310)

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

At November 2007, 1,719,920 people were in receipt of the higher rate mobility component of disability living allowance. Information about the number of vehicle excise duty exemption certificates issued by this Department for people in this group could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Information about the war pensioners’ mobility component is a matter for my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Defence.

Employment and Support Allowance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) what proportion of operational staff he estimates will be fully trained to operate the IT systems for the introduction of the employment and support allowance; (220211)

(2) how many Jobcentre Plus branches operate the customer account management system in anticipation of the introduction of the employment and support allowance.

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

The administration of Jobcentre Plus is a matter for the Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus, Lesley Strathie. I have asked her to provide the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Lesley Strathie:

The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your questions asking what proportion of operational staff he estimates will be fully trained to operate the IT systems for the introduction of the Employment and Support Allowance on 27th October 2008; and how many Jobcentre Plus branches operate the Customer Account Management system in anticipation of the introduction of the Employment and Support Allowance. This is something that falls within the responsibilities delegated to me as Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus.

For the introduction of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), we are introducing the Customer Account Management (CAM) system to capture new claim information and we have adapted the Jobseeker’s Allowance Payment System to make payments to ESA customers.

CAM will not be deployed within Jobcentre Plus offices before the introduction of ESA. Jobcentre Plus is implementing ESA using a carefully phased approach. The CAM system will initially be deployed in one of the 64 Benefit Delivery Centres, its linked Jobcentres, and the 6 Contact Centres that will handle ESA claims from 27 October 2008. The rest of the Benefit Delivery Centre and Jobcentre network processing ESA will operate clerical data input processes, with CAM rolling out fully following an evaluation of the initial deployment of the system. Further roll out is currently planned, subject to evaluation for the first half of 2009.

We have put in place a rolling training plan to ensure that staff can confidently use these new programmes whilst maintaining a full service to our customers.

This phased approach to CAM will provide an opportunity to learn from the initial deployment to ensure that a fully optimised system rolls out nationally. We are confident that, with the plans we have in place, ESA will be successfully delivered in October 2008, but we do not underestimate the challenge for Jobcentre Plus that ESA represents. ESA is not simply a new benefit but a cultural shift to focus on customers’ capability to improve their lives through finding and staying in work.

Health and Safety Executive: Inspections

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assessment he has made of the effect of Health and Safety Executive inspections on safety in the workplace. (219332)

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

Inspection is an important part of ensuring Health and Safety laws are adhered to. Research has indicated that inspection has an influence in this respect; alongside a variety of other factors which are also influential.

HSE influences employers in many different ways; including the provision of advice and guidance, and interventions through inspection, campaigns, blitzes and formal enforcement. The prime factor which governs whether there are fatalities, injuries or ill heath at work is the motivation of the employer. Changes in employer motivation cannot solely be achieved through HSE inspection.

HSE regularly reviews and revisits the impact of its interventions on health and safety outcomes. HSE is already developing further research that assesses the impact of inspection and associated activities, over and above the influence of other factors, on health and safety outcomes.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many Health and Safety Executive inspections he expects to take place in 2008. (219334)

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) expects to increase its operational productivity by 2 per cent. in 2008-09, compared to that in 2007-08. In 2007-08, HSE spent 190,561 days on frontline activity which includes inspection, investigation, assessment of safety cases and other work.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many Health and Safety Executive inspections took place in each of the last three years. (219335)

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) records the amount of lime spent on frontline activity which includes inspection, investigation, assessment of safety cases and other work, rather than the number of inspections carried out.

For the three years; 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08, the time spent by HSE on frontline activity was:

Health and Safety Executive Inspections

Frontline activity

Number of days

2005-06

174,040

2006-07

184,843

2007-08

190,561

Health and Safety Executive: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many inspectors were employed by the Health and Safety Executive's Nuclear Directorate in each of the last five years, broken down by division. (236567)

The answer to the question is provided in the following table.

Number of inspectors1 working in the Health and Safety Executive's Nuclear Directorate 1 April 2004 to 1 April 2008

Headcount

Division

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Director of NSD

1

1

1

1

1

Civil Nuclear Power Regulation

56

58

53

61

44

Nuclear Chemical and Research Site Regulation

58

53

48

50

54

Defence Nuclear Facilities Regulation

38

40

41

41

39

Operational Strategy, Communication and Stakeholder Engagement and Business Systems2

29

22

25

28

17

Nuclear Reactor Generic Design Assessment

0

0

0

0

18

Total

182

174

168

181

173

1 These are primarily nuclear installations inspectors, but also include a small number of other HSE-grade inspectors involved in the work of regulating nuclear installations. At 1 October 2008, there were 164 nuclear installations inspectors in post (approximately 159 full-time equivalents).

2 These figures include 17 corporate topic group inspectors in April 2004, 10 in April 2005, 8 in April 2006, and 8 in April 2007. ND managed two of HSE's corporate topic groups on radiation and on electrical and control instrumentation but these did not contribute to the work of regulating nuclear installations.

Incapacity Benefit

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the Government's policy is on the future of incapacity benefit; what related initiatives he (a) has recently introduced and (b) plans to introduce; and if he will make a statement. (219449)

[holding answer 17 July 2008]: The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

From April 2008, Pathways to Work support has been available to everyone in Great Britain on incapacity benefits. This is mandatory for new customers.

From October 2008 incapacity benefits will be replaced for new customers by the employment and support allowance. Employment and support allowance will include the new work capability assessment, focusing on what people can do, not what they cannot.

From 2009 Pathways to Work support will be mandatory for existing claimants under the age of 25. Also from 2009, we plan to start applying the new work capability assessment to incapacity benefits customers who are under the age of 25 to establish entitlement to employment and support allowance and to the rest of the incapacity benefits claimants from 2010, as and when customers are due to have their benefit entitlement reassessed. This means that over a three year period everyone on incapacity benefits will have been reassessed using the new test, and transferred either to employment and support allowance or to jobseekers allowance.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what transitional support will be available for incapacity benefit claimants who fail the new work capability assessment and move onto other benefits; and what account this support will take of (a) whether people continue to have disabilities and (b) the period for which people have been out of work. (220323)

[holding answer 21 July 2008]: The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

The new work capability assessment is a fairer and more accurate test of capability for work than the current personal capability assessment.

Those customers who move to jobseeker’s allowance following a work capability assessment will have voluntary early entry to the supported job-search stage of the new jobseeker’s allowance and flexible new deal programme, at the discretion of their personal adviser. All longer-term job seekers will have the enhanced personal, specialised support of the flexible new deal.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of the financial effects of the introduction of employment and support allowance on couples in the support group during the course of their claim, compared to the rates of payment of incapacity benefit; and whether these effects will apply to couples where one or both are claiming on the grounds of a terminal illness. (220324)

[holding answer 21 July 2008]: The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

Employment and support allowance will replace incapacity benefit and income support paid on grounds of incapacity from 27 October 2008. Compared to the existing system, couples in the support group who would have had no entitlement to the enhanced disability premium will receive £10.30 a week more under employment support allowance than income support paid on grounds of incapacity. Those who would have been entitled to the couple rate of income support and also already entitled to the enhanced disability premium would receive £7.85 a week less. There are no actual cash losers as existing customers will have the cash level of their existing benefits protected.

Employment and support allowance rates are paid after 14 weeks of the claim whereas the higher income support rates are generally paid after 52 weeks of incapacity or 28 weeks for those who are terminally ill or receive the higher rate care component of disability living allowance. In employment and support allowance the higher rates of benefit are paid immediately to people who are terminally ill.

Income Support: Lone Parents

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of the number of lone parents affected by the changes to the eligibility rules for income support coming into effect in November 2008 who have children (a) living in (i) relative poverty and (ii) absolute poverty before the changes came into effect and (b) who will be living in each such state immediately after the changes came into effect; and if he will make a statement. (230279)

The most common and internationally recognised threshold to measure relative low income poverty is income below 60 per cent. of the contemporary median. A threshold of 60 per cent. of the 1998-99 median has been used to measure absolute poverty. Specific information regarding low income for the UK is available in ‘Households Below Average Income 1994-95 to 2006-07’.

‘Ready for work: full employment in our generation’, Cm 7290, (published in December 2007) announced increased obligations for lone parents to be introduced from November 2008. Lone parents who are claiming income support solely based on being a lone parent move onto a more appropriate benefit when their youngest child is: 12 and over from November 2008; 10 and over from October 2009; seven and over from October 2010.

The Department's current estimates suggest that the changes to the eligibility rules for income support for lone parents will, by helping more lone parents into employment, help lift around an extra 70,000 children out of relative low income after five years.

The following table shows the number of children aged seven and over in lone parent families in receipt of income support in relative and absolute low income at 2006-07.

Numbers of children aged seven or over in lone parent families where their parent is in receipt of income support and the youngest child in the family is aged seven or over in households with incomes below 60 per cent. of contemporary and 1998-99 median income, before and after housing costs, United Kingdom, 2006-07

Million

Number in low income households

Low income threshold

Before housing costs

After housing costs

Below 60 per cent, of contemporary median

0.3

0.4

Below 60 per cent. of 1998-99 median

0.1

0.3

Notes:

1. These statistics are based on Households Below Average Income (HBAI) data.

2. Small differences should be treated with caution as these will be affected by sampling error and variability in non-response.

3. The reference period for HBAI figures is single financial years.

4. The income measures used to derive the estimates shown employ the same methodology as the Department for Work and Pensions publication ‘HBAI’ series, which uses disposable household income, adjusted (or “equivalised”) for household size and composition, as an income measure as a proxy for standard of living.

5. The figures are based on OECD equivalisation factors.

6. Numbers of children have been rounded to the nearest 100,000.

7. Figures have been presented on both a Before Housing Cost (BHC) and After Housing Cost (AHC) basis. For BHC, housing costs (such as rent, water rates, mortgage interest payments, structural insurance payments and ground rent and service charges) are not deducted from income, while for AHC they are.

Source:

Households Below Average Income 2006-07, DWP

Some lone parents are exempt from these changes and will still be able to receive income support. These include lone parents: who are in receipt of carer's allowance; have a child for whom they are receiving the middle or higher rate care component of disability living allowance; who are fostering.

Income Support: Mortgages

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the Answer of 6 November 2008, Official Report, column 704W, on income support: mortgage costs, if he will review the qualification criteria to take account of family circumstances where two incomes have been necessary to meet mortgage repayments. (237255)

We are currently considering all the ways in which we can help people, including couples, who are having difficulty in paying their mortgage.

Independent Case Examiner for the Child Support Agency: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many staff were employed by the Independent Case Examiner in each of the last three years. (235890)

The information is in the table.

Number of staff in post

4 April 2005

83

3 April 2006

90.6

2 April 2007

99.3

Independent Living Fund

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what contribution the Independent Living Fund makes to the delivery of his policy on personalised care and support for adults. (237091)

The Independent Living Fund plays a vital role in the delivery of policy on personalised care and support for adults.

The fund works in partnership with local authorities by making direct cash payments to enable severely disabled people to live independently. Over the last 20 years the fund has assisted more than 45,000 people to live independently in the community and we know it is much appreciated by its users.

The Independent Living Fund was one of six funding streams that have taken part in the Department of Health led individual budget pilots. The Government are currently considering the findings from the evaluation of the individual budget pilots and will look carefully at issues identified during the pilot phase.

Independent Living Funds

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what plans he has to implement the recommendations of the 2007 review of the Independent Living Funds. (237256)

The report of the Independent Living Fund review recognised the ground-breaking role played by the fund in enabling severely disabled people to live independently.

The report included 68 recommendations, a number of which have already been implemented by the trustees.

The recommendations specifically on the future of the fund largely relate to the outcome of the Individual Budgets pilots. The Government are currently considering the findings from the Individual Budget pilots evaluation report which was published on 21 October 2008 and will look carefully at issues identified during the pilot phase.

Industrial Accidents: Construction

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many construction industry workers died as a result of workplace accidents in (a) 2005, (b) 2006 and (c) 2007. (219880)

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

Fatal injuries to workers in the construction industry1

Year2

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08*

Employees

43

54

54

Self employed

17

25

18

Workers3

60

79

72

1 Section F 'Construction', determined according to Standard Industrial Classification (SIC). This system is used in UK official statistics for classifying businesses by the main type of economic activity they are engaged in, and is the responsibility of the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The latest version is 'SIC 2003'.

2 The annual basis is the planning year 1 April to 31 March. Statistics for 2007-08 are provisional, denoted by '*'.

3 The term 'workers' includes employees and the self-employed combined.

Source:

RIDDOR (The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995)

Industrial Health and Safety: Construction

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what plans he has to improve the safety of high tower cranes. (219336)

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

Work to improve safety arising from the use of tower cranes in construction is already being taken forward in a number of ways by both the construction industry and the Health and Safety Executive. Bodies such as the Strategic Forum for Construction and the Construction Plant-Hire Association are working to improve industry guidance on matters such as crane maintenance, crane operator competence and working conditions and better sharing of good practice. As well as giving substantial support to the work of industry, the Health and Safety Executive is taking action to improve safety through a mix of enforcement initiatives and the provision of guidance. Future work will also take account of the findings from the inquiries into recent accidents involving tower cranes that the Health and Safety Executive are currently undertaking.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many Health and Safety Executive inspections of construction sites took place in (a) 2005, (b) 2006 and (c) 2007. (219338)

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) records the amount of time spent on frontline activity—which includes inspection, investigation, assessment of safety cases and other work—rather than the number of inspections carried out.

For the three years 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08 the estimated amount of frontline activity spent on construction was:

Health and Safety Executive Inspections

Frontline activity1

Number of days

2005-06

23,153

2006-07

27,222

2007-08

28,545

1 These figures exclude time spent travelling to and from workplaces which have been visited.

These figures are based on a proportion of HSE's overall frontline activity in each of these years, reflecting the size of HSE's Construction Division compared to the Field Operations Directorate as a whole.

Minimum Wage: Crosby

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people in Crosby constituency experienced a rise in income as a result of the introduction of the national minimum wage; and what estimate he has made of the number of such people whose income is affected by the national minimum wage in 2008. (236678)

I have been asked to reply.

Evidence from the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE) shows that a growing number of people are affected by the National Minimum Wage (NMW). BERR estimates using ASHE data that in 1999 around 1 million people in the UK were covered by the introduction of the NMW. This rises to around 1.1 million people covered by the October 2008 uprating of the NMW. This reflects an increasing importance of the NMW when determining the hourly wage of the low paid. The adult NMW has risen by around 59 per cent during this period from £3.60 to £5.73 per hour. The rise in the NMW has been greater than average earnings over this period.

Information for individual parliamentary constituencies is not readily available in the ASHE dataset. However, information is available on a government office region basis. In 1999 around 120,000 employees in North West and Mersey were covered by the introduction of the National Minimum Wage. This estimate is based on Spring 1998 ASHE data. Using Spring 2008 ASHE data we estimate that around 130,000 employees were covered by the latest October 2008 NMW upratings.

It is difficult to isolate the effect of the NMW on income as income is affected by hours worked and other sources of income such as tax credits. However, evidence suggests that since its introduction the NMW is affecting more people and the hourly wage is rising faster than average earnings benefiting the lowest paid in the economy.

Motability

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what his Department's role is in the administration of the motability scheme; and if he will make a statement. (219529)

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

Motability is a charitable company incorporated by Royal Charter. It is responsible for the administration of the Motability scheme.

National Insurance

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many national insurance registration numbers have been issued to (a) non-UK nationals of each nationality and (b) UK citizens in (i) each year and (ii) each quarter since 1st January 2004. (233537)

I refer the hon. Member to the written answer I gave on 10 November 2008, Official Report, column 917W, on the number of national insurance registrations issued to adult non-UK nationals in each year since 1 January 2004.

The number of national insurance numbers issued to adult non-UK nationals in each quarter since 1 January 2004 has been placed in the Library.

The majority of UK nationals are registered with national insurance numbers (NINOs) as part of the juvenile registration process just prior to the age of 16. A small number of UK nationals apply for a NINO as adults and would go through the adult NINO allocation process. The data are not held in a format which allows us to extract a figure for UK nationals registered for a NINO under the adult NINO allocation process.

Figures for the juvenile registration process are as follows:

Period

Juvenile registration volumes (thousand)

Percentage change

2003-04

753.6

2004-05

743.2

-1.4

2005-06

722.9

-2.7

2006-07

772.1

+6.8

2007-08

667.3

-15.7

Notes:

1. Reporting period for juvenile registration is 1 April to 31 March.

2. For the majority of juveniles the registration process takes place just prior to the 16th birthday. However, some juveniles may initially miss out on this process, but can be recorded as part of this process until the age of 19.

3. There may be a small number of young foreign nationals who obtain a national insurance number through the juvenile registration process. These will not appear in the foreign nationals total for adult national insurance number registrations. However, the majority of juvenile registrations are for UK nationals.

Source:

Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs National Insurance Recording System (NIRS2) Management Information

The fall in registrations during 2007-08 was due to delays in the administrative allocation process following the loss of HMRC child benefit data. The backlog of registrations was completed on 8 May 2008

Figures for the juvenile registration process by quarter since 1 January 2004 are as follows:

Period

Juvenile registrations volumes (Thousand)

2004-05

January 2004 to March 2005

181.0

2005-06

April 2005 to June 2005

193.0

July 2005 to September 2005

183.1

October 2005 to December 2005

164.0

January 2005 to March 2006

182.8

2006-07

April 2006 to June 2006

199.3

July 2006 to September 2006

202.1

October 2006 to December 2006

187.7

January 2006 to March 2007

183.0

2007-08

April 2007 to June 2007

189.6

July 2007 to September 2007

198.1

October 2007 to December2007

113.8

January 2007 to March 2008

165.8

Notes:

1. Reporting period for juvenile registration is 1 April to 31 March.

2. For the majority of juveniles the registration process takes place just prior to the 16th birthday. However, some juveniles may initially miss out on this process, but can be recorded as part of this process until the age of 19.

3. There may be a small number of young foreign nationals who obtain a national insurance number through the juvenile registration process. These will not appear in the foreign nationals total for adult national insurance number registrations. However, the majority of juvenile registrations are for UK nationals

Source:

Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs National Insurance Recording System (NIRS2) Management Information

Pension Credit: Enfield

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many pensioners in Enfield, North constituency received pension credits in each year since 2003. (235416)

The information requested is in the following table.

Number of household recipients and individual beneficiaries of pension credit in Enfield, North, 2003-08

Household recipients

Individual beneficiaries

November 2003

3,240

3,930

May 2004

3,620

4,430

May 2005

3,960

4,870

May 2006

4,050

5,010

May 2007

4,090

5,030

May 2008

4,120

5,050

Notes:

1. Case loads are rounded to the nearest 10.

2. Household recipients are those people who claim pension credit either for themselves only or on behalf of a household.

3. Individual beneficiaries includes both claimants and their partners.

Source:

DWP Information Directorate Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study 100 per cent. data

Pension Credit: South Yorkshire

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many pensioners in (a) Doncaster, (b) Barnsley and (c) South Yorkshire received pension credit in each year since its inception. (236302)

The information requested is in the following tables.

Number of household recipients and individual beneficiaries of pension credit in Doncaster, Barnsley and South Yorkshire, 2003-08

Doncaster

Barnsley

South Yorkshire

Household recipients

Individual beneficiaries

Household recipients

Individual beneficiaries

Household recipients

Individual beneficiaries

November 2003

11,500

13,960

9,790

11,880

57,970

70,410

May 2004

14,510

17,890

11,840

14,570

69,670

85,880

May 2005

15,780

19,520

12,530

15,480

74,020

91,640

May 2006

16,150

20,070

12,610

15,650

74,390

92,480

May 2007

16,300

20,310

12,720

15,860

74,790

93,140

May 2008

16,230

20,260

12,690

15,840

74,110

92,360

Notes:

1. Caseloads are rounded to the nearest 10.

2. Household recipients are those people who claim pension credit either for themselves only or on behalf of a household.

3. Individual beneficiaries includes both claimants and their partners.

Source:

DWP Information Directorate Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study 100 per cent data.

Post Office Card Account

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of the cost of compensation to be paid to unsuccessful bidders for the Post Office Card Account contract. (236998)

[holding answer 18 November 2008]: The other bidders who were still in the competition at the point we halted it will be reimbursed for their reasonable bid costs.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the cost to his Department was of the tendering and bidding process for the Post Office Card Account. (236999)

[holding answer 18 November 2008]: It is not possible to give a precise figure as many of the staff involved were undertaking work on the procurement process alongside other duties, or work which would have been necessary in any event to put in place a new contract with the Post Office.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what his latest estimate is of the costs of the Post Office Card Account tender process over the last three years; and how much compensation will be paid to participants in the tendering process. (237403)

It is not possible to give a precise figure for the costs of the tendering process as many of the staff involved were undertaking work on the procurement process alongside other duties, or work which would have been necessary in any event to put in place a new contract with the Post Office.

The other bidders who were still in the competition at the point we halted it will be reimbursed for their reasonable bid costs. The precise amount is still to be agreed.

Post Office Card Account: Romsey

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many residents of Romsey constituency (a) have a Post Office card account and (b) had a Post Office card account in each of the last five years. (235950)

Information is not available in the precise format requested.

The following table shows the number of benefit and pension accounts paid into a Post Office card account in Romsey constituency in each of the last five years.

Post Office Card Accounts

As at April each year

Number

2004

560

2005

3,700

2006

3,660

2007

3,480

2008

3,210

Notes:

1. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10.

2. Figures refer to payment accounts live and in payment on the specified date. Claimants with more than one account will be counted for each account.

Source:

DWP, Information Directorate.

Poverty: Children

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of the number of children in child poverty in (a) Glasgow North West constituency, (b) Glasgow and (c) Scotland. (234848)

Our public service agreement “Halve the number of children in poverty by 2010-11, on the way to eradicating child poverty by 2020” includes a range of indicators related to low income for children. Our preferred measure of relative low income poverty for children is defined as being in a household with a household income of less than 60 per cent. of the contemporary median income on a before housing cost basis.

Latest information for Scotland shows that 210,000 children in Scotland were in households with household incomes below 60 per cent. of median income on a before housing cost basis. The data source does not allow us to provide robust numbers for estimates below this level.

Notes:

1. The source of this information is the 2006-07 Scottish Households Below Average Income publication.

2. The income measures used to derive the estimates shown employ the same methodology as the Department for Work and Pensions publication “Households Below Average Income” series, which uses disposable household income, adjusted (or ‘equivalised’) for household size and composition, as an income measure as a proxy for standard of living.

3. The figures are based on OECD equivalisation factors.

4. Figures are based on survey data and as such are subject to a degree of sampling and non-sampling error.

5. Number of children in low-income households have been rounded to the nearest 10,000 children.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many children in Crosby constituency were living in absolute poverty in (a) 1997 and (b) the latest date for which figures are available; and what percentage of all children living in absolute poverty this represented in each year. (236679)

The information requested is not available.

Our child poverty statistics, published in the Households Below Average Income series, only allow a breakdown of the number of children in absolute poverty at Government office region level. Information is therefore not available at parliamentary constituency level.

Poverty: Pensioners

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many pensioners are living in absolute poverty in Crosby constituency; and how many did so in 1997. (236605)

Poverty is a complex and multidimensional issue and, as such, there are many possible measures of poverty.

Our Public Service Agreement “Tackle poverty and promote greater independence and wellbeing in later life" includes a range of indicators related to low income for pensioners. These are relative low income (below 50 and 60 per cent. contemporary median household income), and absolute low income (below 60 per cent. of 1998-99 median income uprated in line with prices), all measured after housing costs have been taken into account.

The data source does not allow us to provide robust numbers for estimates below the level of Government Office Region. Information for the north west on the numbers of pensioners below 60 per cent. of 1998-99 median income uprated in line with prices is given in the following table.

Number of pensioners below 60 per cent. of the 1998-99 median household income uprated in line with prices after housing costs, North West

Number (million)

1997-98 to 1999-2000

0.3

2004-05 to 2006-07

0.1

Notes:

1. Three survey year averages are given as regional single year estimates are subject to volatility.

2. The income measures used to derive the estimates shown employ the same methodology as the Department for Work and Pensions publication 'Households Below Average Income' (HBAI) series, which uses disposable household income, adjusted (or "equivalised") for household size and composition, as an income measure as a proxy for standard of living.

3. The figures are based on OECD equivalisation factors.

4. Figures are based on survey data and as such are subject to a degree of sampling and non-sampling error.

5. Numbers of pensioners in low income households have been rounded to the nearest 100,000 pensioners.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many pensioners were living in poverty in each region of the UK (a) after housing costs and (b) before housing costs in each year since 1990. (234499)

Poverty is a complex and multidimensional issue and, as such, there are many possible measures of poverty.

Our public service agreement “Tackle poverty and promote greater independence and wellbeing in later life” includes a range of indicators related to low income for pensioners. These are relative low income (below 50 and 60 per cent. contemporary median household income), and absolute low income (below 60 per cent. of 1998-99 median income uprated in line with prices), all measured after housing costs have been taken into account.

Information that is available on the number of pensioners living below 60 per cent. of contemporary median household income, after and before housing costs, by Government office region is given in the following tables.

Table 1: Number of pensioners falling below 60 per cent. of contemporary media household income, after housing costs by region or country

Million

1994-95 to 1996-97

1995-96 to 1997-98

1996-97 to 1998-99

1997-98 to 1999-2000

1998-99 to 2000-01

1999-2000 to 2001-02

2000-01 to 2002-03

2001-02 to 2003-04

2002-03 to 2004-05

2003-04 to 2005-06

2004-05 to 2006-07

North East

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

North West

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

Yorkshire and the Humber

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

East Midlands

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

West Midlands

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

East of England

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

London

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

South East

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

South West

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

Scotland

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.1

Wales

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

Northern Ireland

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

Table 2: Number of pensioners falling below 60 per cent. of contemporary media household income, before housing costs by region or country

Million

1994-95 to 1996-97

1995-96 to 1997-98

1996-97 to 1998-99

1997-98 to 1999-2000

1998-99 to 2000-01

1999-2000 to 2001-02

2000-01 to 2002-03

2001-02 to 2003-04

2002-03 to 2004-05

2003-04 to 2005-06

2004-05 to 2006-07

North East

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

North West

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

Yorkshire and the Humber

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

East Midlands

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

West Midlands

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

East of England

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

London

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

South East

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

South West

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.3

0.2

0.2

0.2

Scotland

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

Wales

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

Northern Ireland

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

Notes:

1. Three survey year averages are given as regional single year estimates are subject to volatility.

2. The income measures used to derive the estimates shown employ the same methodology as the Department for Work and Pensions publication ‘Households Below Average Income’ (HBAI) series, which uses disposable household income, adjusted (or “equivalised”) for household size and composition, as an income measure as a proxy for standard of living.

3. The figures are based on OECD equivalisation factors.

4. Figures are based on survey data and as such are subject to a degree of sampling and non-sampling error.

5. Figures have been presented on both a Before Housing Cost and After Housing Cost basis. For Before Housing Cost, housing costs (such as rent, water rates, mortgage interest payments, structural insurance payments and ground rent and service charges) are not deducted from income, while for After Housing Cost they are.

6. Numbers of pensioners in low income households have been rounded to the nearest 100,000 pensioners.

7. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

8. Data for Northern Ireland are only available from 1998-99 to 2000-01 onwards.

9. Specific information regarding low income for the United Kingdom is available in “Households Below Average Income 1994/95-2006/07”.

Social Security Benefits

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will place in the Library a copy of the Work-Focused Health Related Assessment questionnaire which claimants of employment and support allowance will be required to complete from October 2008. (220326)

[holding answer 21 July 2008]: The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

Claimants of employment and support allowance will not be required to fill in a questionnaire in relation to the Work Focussed Health Related Assessment. The Work Focused Health Related Assessment is a discussion between the customer and the health care professional carrying out the work capability assessment. Health professionals will use an aide-mémoire for this discussion, and a copy has been placed in the Library.

The purpose of the Work Focused Health Related Assessment is to explore with customers their aspirations for engaging in or returning to work, and their views of the help that would support them getting back to work. It will also offer advice about health related interventions that will support a return to work. After the Work Focused Health Related Assessment the health care professional will complete a report and send a copy of that report to the customer.

Social Security Benefits: Appeals

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) whether he has set a target for the proportion of successful appeals for (a) incapacity for work cases and (b) disability living allowance cases; (234435)

(2) whether his Department has a performance indicator for the proportion of successful appeals that will trigger a review of the quality of initial decision-making for (a) incapacity for work cases and (b) disability living allowance cases.

There is no target for the proportion of successful incapacity benefits appeals.

There is no performance indicator for the proportion of successful incapacity benefits and disability living allowance appeals that will trigger a review of the quality of initial decision-making.

The Pension, Disability and Carers Service has an internal target that no more than 45 per cent. of disability living allowance cases that are heard by an appeal tribunal should be successful or changed.

Jobcentre Plus and the Pension, Disability and Carers Service will also continue to work with the Tribunals Service to monitor decision making issues and identify any areas for improvement.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the total cost to his Department was of appeals relating to (a) incapacity for work cases, (b) disability living allowance cases and (c) such cases in which the appeal was successfully defended by the Secretary of State in the latest period for which figures are available; and what the average cost of each case in each category was. (234437)

The cost of incapacity benefit appeals only started to be measured separately in April 2008. It is, therefore, not yet possible to provide the information requested.

The total cost to the Pension, Disability and Carers Service of processing all disability living allowance appeals in 2007-08 was an estimated £11.8 million. The average cost of each appeal was an estimated £134. Information about the cost of those appeals that were successfully defended by the Secretary of State is not available.

Social Security Benefits: Employment

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions whether earnings from permitted work done by claimants of employment and support allowance, whether income-based or contribution-based, will be disregarded as income for the purposes of assessing entitlement to other benefits. (220322)

[holding answer 21 July 2008]: The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

Claimants entitled to both income-related and contributory employment and support allowance will be permitted to earn up to £88.50 a week and retain benefit. Where a person retains entitlement to income-related employment and support allowance they will continue to receive full housing benefit and council tax benefit. For people not entitled to income-related employment and support allowance, housing benefit and council tax benefit disregards the first £20 of any earnings. We are currently looking at how the permitted work rules of employment and support allowance will interact with housing benefit as part of the housing benefit review announced in the Budget.

Social Security Benefits: Lone Parents

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assessment he made of the effect of possible higher unemployment levels on (a) the labour market and (b) Jobcentre Plus when drafting the Social Security (Lone Parents and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2008. (234622)

The labour market is dynamic with millions of moves between employment, unemployment and inactivity every year. Job opportunities will continue to become available. At present there are around 600,000 job vacancies in the economy.

We are committed to providing unemployed people with support to get back into work. Jobcentre Plus provides information, advice and access to skills development to help people return to employment as quickly as possible.

We have made a comprehensive assessment of Jobcentre Plus’s capacity to implement the changes and are satisfied that the plans Jobcentre Plus has in place will enable the organisation to manage the change. Plans include: additional resources to manage the move of lone parents from income support on to other benefits; supporting lone parents in receipt of jobseeker’s allowance or employment and support allowance; communicating with staff; and learning and development for staff.

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what safeguards have been put in place in (a) the Social Security (Lone Parents and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2008 and (b) Jobcentre Plus operations to protect the most vulnerable lone parents. (234623)

We propose introducing additional flexibilities and safeguards in regulations. These will meet the specific needs of parents, particularly lone parents, and further safeguard the welfare of children.

Jobseeker’s allowance regulations will be amended to enable Jobcentre Plus staff to consider just cause and good cause so that a parent who is claiming or receiving jobseeker’s allowance may not be penalised if they leave paid employment, or fail to take up paid employment, because appropriate or affordable child care is not available. The amendments will also give Jobcentre Plus staff additional flexibilities to treat parents as available for, or actively seeking, work in certain circumstances. For example, if a child is excluded from school or if there would be no reasonable prospects of a person with caring responsibilities obtaining suitable jobs in the area if they were to reduce their hours to a minimum of 16 hours a week. The existing jobseeker’s allowance hardship regime will be extended to include lone parents as a vulnerable group, and Jobcentre Plus staff will be able to consider whether travel time to a job is reasonable, taking health or caring responsibilities into account.

We also propose to introduce operational safeguards which will ensure that lone parents affected by the introduction of these changes and making a new claim are aware of their obligations to attend quarterly work-focused interviews, and that voluntary interviews will be available to them six weeks before their entitlement to income support ends. Also, if they fail to attend a fortnightly job review, at least one attempt at contacting them will be made by telephone on the day the meeting was missed. If no contact is made, a letter will be sent to their home address telling them that if they do not make contact within five working days their entitlement to benefit will end.

Social Security Benefits: Post Offices

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what proportion of each payable benefit was transacted through (a) a Post Office card account, (b) another account at a post office and (c) a bank account not accessed at a post office in (i) each local authority area and (ii) each parliamentary constituency in the last period for which figures are available. (235107)

Information is not available in the format requested.

Overall, around 78 per cent. of benefit accounts are paid into a bank account and around 20 per cent. are paid into a Post Office card account. About 60 per cent. of bank accounts can be accessed at the Post Office.

State Retirement Pension

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) how many individuals have deferred their state pension in each year since 1997; (229997)

(2) how many individuals deferred their state pensions in each of the last 10 years.

The information requested is not available. Information available on the number of people who have received a deferral reward, and the type of reward received, is in the following table. Figures for 1997 to 1999 are not available.

12 months to March each year:

Total number of customers who received a deferral reward

Number receiving increments only

Number receiving increments and lump sum

Number receiving lump sum only

2008

41,100

23,800

5,400

11,800

2007

35,800

28,500

3,500

3,800

2006

44,100

44,100

0

0

2005

43,300

43,300

0

0

2004

41,200

41,200

0

0

2003

38,400

38,400

0

0

2002

43,000

43,000

0

0

2001

44,000

44,000

0

0

20001

25,600

25,600

0

0

1 Figures for 2000 are for six months to March only

Notes:

1. Numbers are rounded to the nearest 100 and may not sum due to rounding.

2. Numbers are based on a 5 per cent. sample rated in line with the Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study (WPLS) total caseload, and are therefore subject to a degree of sampling variation.

3. New rules for deferral came into effect in April 2005 and lump payments became available from April 2006. This data were not available on the datasets until September 2006. A person who deferred their state pension before April 2005 would qualify for increments for the period up to April 2005 and may have a choice of either a lump sum payment or an increment for the period of deferral from April 2005. This means some people may have both an increment and a lump sum payment.

4. The number receiving a ‘deferral reward’ is the number of people with a lump sum or increments for the latest data and the number of people with increments for the data prior to September 2006. (This does not include inherited increments from a late spouse.)

5. Data regarding increments prior to September 1999 are not sufficiently robust to be released.

Source:

Information Directorate 5 per cent. sample

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many individuals received deferred state pensions in each of the last 12 months. (231851)

The information requested is not available. Information on the number of people who have received a deferral reward in the 12 months ending March 2008, and the type of reward received, is in the following table:

12 months to March 2008

Number

Total number of customers who received a deferral reward

41,100

Number receiving increments only

23,800

Number receiving increments and lump sum

5,400

Number receiving lump sum only

11,800

Notes:

1. Numbers are rounded to the nearest 100 and may not sum due to rounding.

2. Numbers are based on a 5 per cent. sample rated in line with the Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study (WPLS) total caseload, and are therefore subject to a degree of sampling variation.

3. New rules for deferral came into effect in April 2005 and lump payments became available. A person who deferred their state pension before April 2005 would qualify for increments for the period up to April 2005 and may have a choice of either a lump sum payment or an increment for the period of deferral from April 2005. This means some people may have both an increment and a lump sum payment.

4. The number receiving a ‘deferral reward’ is the number of people with a lump sum or increments for the latest data and the number of people with increments for the data prior to September 2006. (This does not include inherited increments from a late spouse.)

Source:

Information Directorate (IFD) 5 per cent. sample

Steam Rollers: Accidents

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people have been (a) killed and (b) injured by steam rollers in each of the last five years. (233176)

Based on reports submitted to the Health and Safety Executive as required by the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995, the number of deaths and injuries involving road rollers is as follows:

Non-fatal

Fatal

2003-04

7

0

2004-05

10

1

2005-06

9

0

2006-07

9

0

2007-08

3

0

Sunbeds: Health Hazards

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions when he expects the outcomes of the Health and Safety Executive's consultation on revisions to guidance on the use of UV tanning equipment to be published; and if he will make a statement. (220410)

The following answer was provided to the hon. Member on 17 September 2008, however, due to a procedural error it was not published in the Official Report. The answer is as follows:

The consultation closed on 17 July and when the comments have been considered, the Health and Safety Executive intends to publish revised guidance as soon as possible.

Taxis

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much was claimed in expenses for taxi travel by officials from (a) his Department and (b) its Executive agencies in (i) 2006-07, (ii) 2005-06, (iii) 2004-05, (iv) 2003-04 and (v) 2002-03; and if he will make a statement. (227047)

The information requested on taxi travel expenditure is available only from 2005-06 and is recorded at departmental level (which includes the Department’s Executive agencies) only. Details of the separate payments made by the Department’s agencies could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

The Department’s expenditure on taxis in the years for which information is available is as follows:

£ million

2005-06

1.89

2006-07

2.45

2007-08

2.02

This amount of expenditure should be viewed in the context of the size of the DWP work force of over 100,000 employees and the nature of its business operations that cover an office network of over 1,000 locations across Great Britain.

The Department has clear policies in place which not only limit the circumstances under which officials can justify the use of taxis but also challenges the need to travel and strongly advocates the use of video and teleconferences wherever these facilities are practical alternatives.

Winter Fuel Payments: Chronically Sick

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what recent estimate his Department has made of the likely cost of extending the winter fuel allowance to terminally ill people who would not otherwise qualify; and if he will make a statement. (236011)

Winter fuel payments are made to people aged 60 or over including those who are disabled or terminally ill.

The annual cost of extending winter fuel payments to people aged under 60 receiving disability living allowance under the special rules relating to a terminal illness is estimated to be approximately £6.6 million. This is an estimate for 2008-09 and is based on a £250 payment, which includes a one off additional payment of £50 for this year.

The extra heating needs of terminally ill people can arise at any time of year, not just in the winter months. Help is available for terminally ill people through disability living allowance, Attendance allowance and the disability premiums in the income-related benefits which have a substantially higher annual value and are spread over a 52 week period. In addition, where a disability premium is paid in an income-related benefit, a cold weather payment is payable in periods of very cold weather. Together, these payments are designed to meet the extra costs, including heating, of terminally ill people.

Winter Fuel Payments: Crosby

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many pensioners aged 60 and over have claimed the winter fuel payment in (a) Crosby constituency and (b) England in each year since its inception; and what proportion of such pensioners have not applied for the payment in each year. (236683)

Around 98 per cent. of winter fuel payments are made automatically without the need to claim.

Winter fuel payments made to people aged 60 or over from inception

Crosby constituency

Great Britain

1999-2000

14,965

10,084,130

2000-01

16,615

11,105,750

2001-02

16,835

11,201,900

2002-03

17,020

11,348,040

2003-04

16,955

11,468,240

2004-05

16,900

11,401,170

2005-06

17,090

11,514,760

2006-07

17,320

11,702,900

Notes:

1. Figures rounded to the nearest 10.

2. Parliamentary constituencies, local authorities and Government office regions are assigned by matching postcodes against the relevant ONS postcode directory.

Source:

Information directorate 100 per cent data.

Information relating to winter fuel payments for the winters of 1997-98 and 1998-99 is not available.

Information regarding Northern Ireland is a matter for the Northern Ireland Office.

Home Department

Acceptable Behaviour Contracts

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when acceptable behaviour contracts will be extended to young people caught drinking and behaving anti-socially in public. (234288)

Antisocial behaviour contracts (ABCs) are already available to tackle young people caught drinking and behaving antisocially in public.

Agricultural Machinery: Theft

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent steps she has taken to reduce the rate of theft of agricultural equipment. (235375)

[holding answer 17 November 2008]: The Government's crime strategy builds upon the achievements of the last 10 years in reducing crime and disorder but moves away from centrally imposed targets instead making local agencies accountable and responsive to the needs and priorities of the local community. This means that local areas can focus greatest effort on reducing those crimes that matter most to people locally, whatever the crime.

Where the theft of agricultural machinery emerges as a pressing local issue we would encourage local police forces and their partners in Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships to devote resources to tackling this crime. To this end the National Policing Improvement Agency has produced a practical guide specifically for those facing the challenges of policing rural areas, titled Neighbourhood Policing in Rural Communities (2008). This aims to support the police in tailoring their approach to the needs of the rural communities they serve.

The Home Office supports schemes such as Farm Watch and Countryside Watch, which are now operating across England and Wales, allowing farmers and those living in rural communities to share practical advice on crime prevention in order to look after their vehicles, property, families and animals.

Antisocial Behaviour Orders

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many anti-social behaviour orders have been (a) issued and (b) breached in each criminal justice system area since 31 December 2005. (232369)

The answer is given in the following table.

The number of antisocial behaviour orders issued in 2006 and the number proven in court to have been breached1 in 2006, by Criminal Justice System Area

CJS area

Number of ASBOs issued

Number of ASBOs breached3

Avon and Somerset

34

18

Bedfordshire

31

9

Cambridgeshire

31

15

Cheshire

43

29

Cleveland

80

39

Cumbria

31

30

Derbyshire

41

26

Devon and Cornwall

46

28

Dorset

15

14

Durham

26

21

Dyfed Powys

8

10

Essex

32

35

Gloucestershire

21

12

Greater London

359

213

Greater Manchester

225

203

Gwent

49

17

Hampshire

66

67

Hertfordshire

35

30

Humberside

115

70

Kent2

29

9

Lancashire

115

78

Leicestershire

42

16

Lincolnshire

17

6

Merseyside

94

51

Norfolk

27

22

North Wales

87

51

North Yorkshire

27

28

Northamptonshire2

13

0

Northumbria

70

22

Nottinghamshire

70

66

South Wales

54

30

South Yorkshire

83

53

Staffordshire

35

22

Suffolk

35

23

Surrey

26

27

Sussex

73

52

Thames Valley

44

33

Warwickshire

27

16

West Mercia

40

34

West Midlands

189

109

West Yorkshire

217

157

Wiltshire

4

10

England and Wales

2,706

1,801

1 ASBOs may be issued in one area and breached in another. Breaches are counted in this table by area of issue. ASBOs may be issued in one year and breached in another. Some of the breaches counted in the table will be associated with ASBOs issued prior to 2006. It is therefore not possible to compute breach rates from the figures presented in this table.

2 Breach data from the magistrates court administrative systems in Kent and Northamptonshire are known to have been under-reported.

3 Covers ASBOs issued in years prior to 2006 as well as those issued in that year.

Note:

Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

Sources:

(ASBOs breached): OCJR Court Proceedings Database.

(ASBOs issued): as reported to the Home Office by the Court Service.

Antisocial Behaviour: Crosby

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent assessment she has made of the effectiveness of anti-social behaviour orders in reducing anti-social behaviour in Crosby constituency. (236717)

Antisocial behaviour orders are one of many powerful tools we created to tackle antisocial behaviour. Three independent reports including the Home Affairs Select Committee report (2005), the Audit Commission report (May 2006) and the NAO report (December 2006) confirmed that they work.

Sefton antisocial behaviour unit uses the full range of interventions that deal with both prevention and enforcement in that they engage, educate and promote awareness among young people; engage with residents and tackle antisocial behaviour in families throughout the borough of Sefton, which includes Crosby. It operates the policy advocated by Home Office Guidance that the appropriate intervention should be used in the right way at the right time and incrementally. This means that a low-level intervention such as a warning letter or antisocial behaviour contract would be used before an ASBO unless the behaviour is sufficiently serious to warrant it.

British Crime Survey

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the technical report relating to the 2007-08 British Crime Survey will be published. (233569)

[holding answer 6 November 2008]: The 2007-08 British crime survey technical report can be found on the following webpage on the Home Office website:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/bcs-methodological.html

Community Policing

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department which police forces have expressed an interest in taking part in the pilots of the community safety participatory budgets referred to in the Policing Green Paper. (232904)

The Home Office has been working with Communities and Local Government and the Participatory Budgeting Unit to establish a set of criteria for the community safety participatory budgeting pilots. A number of practitioners from police forces, police authorities and local authorities have been assisting this process. The criteria are currently being finalised and the Home Office will shortly invite formal expressions of interest in running pilots.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department which local authority areas will receive funding from her Department under the community crime fighters scheme. (236412)

Funding for community crime fighters is not being allocated directly to local authorities. Training, funded by the Home Office, will be offered to around 3,600 people who are already involved with local services, such as tenants and residents groups, neighbourhood watch members and those working with neighbourhood policing teams.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what funding she has allocated to the community crime fighter scheme; and over what time-frame. (236413)

Total funding of £5 million has been allocated to the community crime fighters scheme to cover the period 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what role she proposes for local authorities in the proposed community crime fighters scheme. (236414)

Training will be offered to around 3,600 people who are already involved with local services, such as tenants and residents groups, neighbourhood watch members and those working with neighbourhood policing teams. Local authorities will have an important role, working with the police and other partners, to help identify those who are suitable for the training and to work with them once they have received it.

Crime

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) vehicle thefts, (b) domestic burglaries and (c) violent crimes there were in each of the last 17 years. (234497)

The British Crime Survey (BCS) is the best guide to long term trends in vehicle theft, domestic burglary and violent crime in England and Wales. Prior to 2001-02 the survey ran periodically and estimates are available for only selected years.

These figures are published annually in the Home Office statistical bulletin Crime in England and Wales, a copy of which is available in the House of Commons Library. These estimates are also shown in Table 1.

Table 1: BCS incidents of crime from 1981 to 2007-08

1981

1991

1995

1997

2001-02 ints

2002-03 ints

2004-05 ints

2005-06 ints

2006-07 ints

2007-08 ints

Property crime

Number of incidents (thousand)

Burglary1

749

1,380

1,770

1,621

969

973

756

733

726

729

With entry

474

869

998

852

552

561

469

440

425

435

Attempts

276

511

772

768

416

412

287

293

301

294

With loss

373

712

791

651

396

407

327

315

310

318

No loss (including attempts)

376

668

979

970

573

566

429

418

417

411

Vehicle-related theft

1,751

3,845

4,350

3,511

2,494

2,365

1,886

1,731

1,689

1,497

Theft from vehicle

1,286

2,424

2,544

2,200

1,496

1,425

1,210

1,121

1,129

994

Theft of vehicles

285

522

510

378

316

278

214

185

176

161

Attempts of and from

179

899

1,297

933

683

662

462

425

384

342

Unweighted base-household crime

10,905

10,059

16,310

14,900

32,720

36,395

44,973

47,610

47,027

46,765

Violence

All BCS violence2

2,074

2,556

4,176

3,593

2,728

2,714

2,320

2,349

2,471

2,164

Wounding

508

624

914

804

648

709

577

547

578

467

Assault with minor injury

609

784

1,356

1,198

709

623

629

572

571

481

Assault with no injury

793

966

1,567

1,257

1,015

1,079

860

918

1,002

903

Robbery

164

182

339

334

356

303

255

311

320

313

Violence with injury

1,194

1,441

2,408

2,184

1,497

1,441

1,300

1,227

1,270

1,042

Violence with no injury

881

1,115

1,768

1,409

1,231

1,273

1,020

1,121

1,201

1,122

Domestic violence

292

5343

989

814

626

506

401

357

407

342

Acquaintance

774

1.0433

1,816

1,642

862

949

828

817

845

765

Stranger

844

7973

1,004

784

883

956

836

863

894

744

Mugging (robbery and snatch theft)

250

2593

419

417

430

391

347

382

392

391

Unweighted base-personal crime

10,905

10,059

16,337

14,937

32,787

36,450

45,069

47,729

47,138

46,903

1 Burglary with entry plus attempted burglary add up to total burglary. Burglary with loss plus burglary with no loss (including attempts) also add up to total burglary.

2 All BCS violence includes wounding, assault with minor injury, assault with no injury and robbery. Mugging includes robbery and snatch theft. For more information see the glossary.

3 The 1991 estimates for domestic, acquaintance and stranger violence and mugging were calculated based on the estimate for all BCS violence. Estimates for these individual categories could not be calculated using their individual incidence rates because the data used for calculating these rates were not collected for that year.

Note:

For household crimes the 2007-08 numbers are derived by multiplying offence rates (incidence rates) by 23,607,316 households in England and Wales. For personal crimes the 2007-08 numbers are derived by multiplying incidence rates by 43,859,000 adults in England and Wales.

Crime: Crosby

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what funding her Department has provided to (a) victim support and (b) neighbourhood watch schemes in Crosby constituency in the last 10 years. (236706)

Victim Support is an independent charity and is the main provider of services to victims and witnesses across England and Wales. In 2003, the Government increased the core grant for Victim Support to £30 million, and has maintained annual funding at that level. Victim Support has received a further £12.6 million from government (£5.6 million in 2007-08 and £7 million this financial year) to deliver enhanced services to victims.

Victim Support in Merseyside received £1,134,000 as part of the national grant to Victim Support in this financial year. This covers the Victim Support community service (including additional funds for Victim Support Plus) and grants to the Witness Service, which provides support to witnesses giving evidence in criminal trials at both Crown and magistrates courts.

The Home Office directly meets the costs of providing public liability insurance for all police-registered Neighbourhood Watch schemes. Funding for local partners and statutory agencies to work together to tackle crime, drugs, and anti-social behaviour in their areas is provided to local authorities through the area-based grant. The Home Office does not keep detailed records giving a breakdown of payments to local schemes.

Criminal Records Bureau: Appeals

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people contested details held on record by the Criminal Records Bureau in each of the last five years; and how many of these disputes were upheld. (231777)

The Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) do not hold criminal records but do release information held on police records and other data sources.

The total number of disclosures where the details released by the CRB were contested by the applicant in the last five years and the total number of these that were subsequently upheld is detailed in the following table. These are referred to within the disclosure process as disputes and the CRB has procedures in place to allow an applicant to dispute the information provided.

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Total number of disputes

1,739

2,265

2,675

3,077

4,931

Total number of upheld disputes

1,739

2,265

2,669

2,797

2,785

Total number of disclosures issued

2,284,688

2,430,937

2,770,265

3,277,957

3,323,251

The CRB enhanced its recording of disputes during 2005-06. Prior to this, the CRB did not hold figures for disputes not upheld.

Information released on a disclosure can be disputed for a number of reasons including the inclusion of locally held non-conviction information which the applicant believes to be inaccurate or misleading; situations where an applicant has had their identity stolen; or the inclusion of data which an applicant was unaware would appear on the disclosure.

Departmental Data Protection

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether confidential or personal information has been compromised through the loss of property from her Department since 1997. (193447)

Except in exceptional cases, when it is in the public interest, it has been the policy of successive Governments not to comment on breaches of security. However, following the publication of the Data Handling Procedures in Government: Interim Progress Report on 17 December 2007, Official Report, column 98WS, all Departments will cover information assurance issues in their annual reports.

Departmental Written Questions

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what the average time taken by her Department has been to answer ordinary Parliamentary written questions in the Parliamentary session to date; (230573)

(2) how many ordinary Parliamentary written questions were tabled to her Department in (a) March 2008 and (b) April 2008; and how many such questions remain unanswered;

(3) how many members of staff are employed by her Department to support Ministers in answering Parliamentary written questions.

[holding answer 27 October 2008]: The information requested is in the following tables.

Number

Normal written questions received1

3,891

Target sitting days to answer

5

Average sitting days to answer

8

March 2008

April 2008

Normal written questions received (Number)

487

442

Questions outstanding1 (Number)

6

8

Percentage of received questions outstanding

1.2

1.8

1 To 13 November 2008.

There are four full-time equivalent posts in the Home Office parliamentary unit dedicated solely to supporting Ministers in answering parliamentary written questions. Many other officials contribute to answering questions, but this number can be quantified only at disproportionate cost.

Dispersal Orders: Enfield

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how dispersal orders have been issued in the London Borough of Enfield in each year since 2003. (235438)

The number of dispersal orders issued in Enfield since 2003 is as follows:

Number

2004

4

2005

4

2006

1

2007

3

2008

6

Driving Under Influence: Drugs

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when her Department plans to give type approval for a device for use in testing a driver for the presence of a drug in his body under Section 6 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, as amended. (237204)

[holding answer 18 November 2008]: Before approving such a device, the Secretary of State must be wholly satisfied that it will be reliable in operational use and suitable for the purposes of criminal law enforcement. This will be ensured by requiring the device to be compliant with the necessarily rigorous, detailed and precise specification that is currently being developed. How soon a device might be approved will depend on how soon manufacturers present a device which they claim is compliant, how that device performs in tests and how quickly manufacturers then make any necessary adjustments.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people were convicted of driving while unfit through use of a drug in the last year for which figures are available. (237205)

[holding answer 18 November 2008]: Information provided by the Ministry of Justice shows that in 2006 (latest available) there were 92,671 convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Data for 2007 are due to be published at the end of November 2008.

The data cover both drink and drugs offences combined, as volumes of convictions and custodial sentences for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs cannot be accurately established.

Driving Under Influence: Hertfordshire

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many offences of (a) drug and (b) drink driving were recorded in (i) Hemel Hempstead and (ii) Hertfordshire in each year since 1997. (233848)

Offences of driving while unfit through drugs or drink are summary offences and do not feature in the recorded crime statistics collected by the Home Office.

The Home Office does collect data on recorded offences of ‘Causing death by dangerous or careless driving (including while under the influence of drink or drugs)’. However, it is not possible to determine from the information held centrally which, if any, of these offences were committed while the offender was under the influence.

The available information for the above offence is given in the following table. Hemel Hempstead comes within the Dacorum local authority area. Data for this offence have only been collected at local authority area level since 2000-01.

Recorded offences of causing death by dangerous or careless driving (including while under the influence of drink or drugs)

Dacorum local authority area

Hertfordshire

1997

n/a

2

1998-99

n/a

6

1999-2000

n/a

5

2000-01

0

4

2001-02

0

12

2002-03

4

12

2003-04

0

6

2004-05

2

13

2005-06

0

4

2006-07

0

11

2007-08

0

13

n/a = Not applicable

Driving Under Influence: Police

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many police officers in England and Wales were convicted of drink driving offences in each of the last three years. (236911)

The information requested is not available.

Information is not collected centrally on the occupation of offenders unless specific to the offence legislation.

Dungavel Detention Centre

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the average length of detention period in Dungavel Detention Centre of (a) a family and (b) an individual, aged (i) under 18, (ii) under 16 and (iii) under 10 years old in each of the last three years. (232797)

[holding answer 3 November 2008]: The average length of detention for a family in Dungavel House has remained at three days for 2006, 2007 and up until September for 2008.

The average length of detention for single detainees was 17 days in 2006, 23 days in 2007 and 27 days up until September 2008.

We do not have the data available in relation to age groups and to provide them would be at disproportionate cost.

Electronic Surveillance: Databases

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) of 30 October 2008, Official Report, column 1251W, on electronic surveillance: databases, whether local authorities will have access to mobile telephone geodata. (236140)

No. Directive 2006/24/EC will not change the kinds of data that local authorities are permitted to access under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) of 30 October 2008, Official Report, column 1251W, on electronic surveillance: databases, whether local authorities will have access to communications data retained by internet service providers. (236141)

Local authority access to communications data retained by internet service providers will be on the same basis as their access to communications data retained by any other communications service provider. That is they will continue under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 to have access to service use and subscriber data, but not traffic data, the class of communications data that would indicate specific areas of internet interest or activity.

Entry Clearances: Kyrgyzstan

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) when the applications for visas for the Kyrgyzstan musicians and performers invited to perform in the UK in November 2008 were received at the UK Embassy in Astana; when the applications were processed; when the applications were refused; and if she will make a statement; (235552)

(2) for what reasons the musicians and performers invited to the UK by the Ambassador of Kyrgyzstan were denied visas to perform in the UK in November 2008; and if she will make a statement.

The applications have not been refused and are in fact ready to be issued pending receipt of results checks. However, I regret that this is obviously too late for the event in which they were originally due to perform. I can only add my apologies to those which have already been extended to the Kyrgyz ambassador in London by colleagues in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office for the disruption this caused to the event he planned in November.

The office in Almaty is working hard with engineers to rectify the problems as quickly as possible. UKBA hoped to resume a fully effective service in Almaty by 14 November.

Extradition: EU Countries

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many European arrest warrants for (a) British citizens and (b) non-British citizens her Department has issued to other EU member states; and how many people have been extradited to the UK under such warrants in each year since they came into force, broken down by (i) offence and (ii) member state to which the warrant was issued; (227620)

(2) how many European arrest warrants for (a) British citizens and (b) non-British citizens have been received from other EU member states; and how many people have been extradited under such warrants in each year since they came into force, broken down by (i) offence and (ii) member state of destination.

The Serious Organised Crime Agency is the designated central authority for the receipt and transmission of European Arrest Warrants in the UK. There is no Government involvement in the operation of the EAW. The following tables, provided by SOCA, give figures for the following:

(a) Number of persons extradited to EU member states under the EAW regime (Part 1 warrants) by the UK broken down by year and by country.

(b) Number of subjects surrendered to the UK by EU member states (Part 3 warrants) broken down by year and by country.

(c) EAWs received by the UK from other EU member states broken down by year and EAWs issued to other EU member states by the UK, broken down by year.

All figures for this year are January to September 2008.

It is not possible from current systems to provide data broken down into British and non-British nationals, nor into type of offence. SOCA is putting in place a new database to hold this information

Warrants issued by the UK for one individual may be sent to more than one member state. The UK receives a large number of warrants from other member states. To break down the figures in the third table by originating state would incur disproportionate cost.

Extradited from the UK

Surrenders

Part one EAW

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Total

Austria

2

2

Belgium

3

8

1

5

4

21

Bulgaria

1

1

Cyprus

1

1

Czech Republic

17

30

47

Denmark

3

3

6

Finland

1

2

1

1

5

France

1

4

15

8

11

39

Germany

8

16

19

13

56

Greece

2

1

3

Hungary

3

1

7

11

Ireland

4

11

20

23

17

75

Italy

5

9

2

16

Latvia

2

7

9

18

Lithuania

3

25

48

62

36

174

Malta

1

1

Netherlands

3

3

2

11

4

23

Poland

4

20

136

186

346

Portugal

5

3

2

3

2

15

Romania

2

11

13

Slovak Republic

4

4

1

9

Slovenia

1

1

Spain

1

3

4

6

13

27

Sweden

2

1

4

1

2

10

Total

23

75

151

320

351

Extradited to the UK

Surrenders

Part three EAW

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Total

Austria

0

Belgium

2

1

4

4

3

14

Bulgaria

1

1

Cyprus

1

1

2

Czech Republic

1

5

3

9

Denmark

2

1

3

Estonia

2

2

Finland

0

France

2

7

8

7

3

27

Germany

6

4

4

3

17

Gibraltar

1

1

Greece

4

2

1

7

Hungary

1

1

Ireland

4

22

24

24

74

Italy

1

1

1

3

Latvia

1

1

Lithuania

2

2

4

Luxembourg

1

1

Malta

0

Netherlands

2

10

4

11

9

36

Poland

2

4

6

12

Portugal

2

1

2

1

4

10

Romania

1

1

2

Slovak Republic

1

2

3

Slovenia

0

Spain

12

29

18

28

17

104

Sweden

1

1

Total

24

62

75

96

78

Number of EAWs issued to and by the UK since 1 January 2004

Totals by year

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Part one EAW

1,865

5,986

3,329

2,534

2,428

Part three EAW

96

131

75

185

172

Fingerprints

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the cost has been of police forces using handheld fingerprinting devices to date. (234864)

The total cost so far met by police forces using hand held fingerprinting devices is £31,400.

The project costs, including the provision centrally of the held-held fingerprint hardware, software, research and development, service and support to the end of 2007, the latest date for which figures are available, has been £3,350,000.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department from which budget the cost of paying for the use of handheld fingerprinting devices by police forces will be met. (234865)

The anticipated benefits derived from the provision of the handheld fingerprinting devices beyond the current field trials mean that their costs, supporting infrastructure and back-office services should be self-financing. As such, these costs will be met from within existing police force budgets. Other associated costs, for example, procurement, training, and the promulgation of good practice, will be met by the National Policing Improvement Agency.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what discussions she has had with the Association of Chief Police Officers on the issuing of new guidelines to take into account the use of handheld fingerprinting devices. (234866)

The Association of Chief Police Officers is represented at board level on the current field trials and procurement activity for future handheld fingerprinting capabilities. These projects will develop the procurement, training, and the promulgation of good practice for the use of mobile fingerprint capabilities. Amendments to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE), and the associated code D of its codes of practice, will govern the use of the fingerprint capability.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how the use of handheld fingerprinting devices will be monitored; and how the data so gathered will be recorded. (234867)

The use of the handheld fingerprint capability will form part of the stop and search/stop and account processes. As such, data on its use will be captured and reported on as part of the overall data submitted by police forces to the Home Office on these activities.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment she has made of the implications of the use of handheld fingerprinting devices for the recording of criminal records. (234868)

No such assessment has been made as it is not intended that the devices should be used to capture fingerprints for use in the validation or recording of criminal records.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment she has made of whether handheld fingerprint devices are used in a consistent manner by rural and urban police forces. (234871)

The use of handheld fingerprint devices is a matter for the chief constable of each police force and for the present time requires consent from the individual being sampled. Available data suggest that there is no difference in the use of the devices between police forces, given the nature of the deployment that it is supporting.

The use of the handheld fingerprint capability will form part of the stop and search/stop and account processes. As such, data on its use will be captured and reported on as part of the overall data submitted by police forces to the Home Office on these activities.

Fingerprints: Airports

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department for what reasons she would mandate airport operators to carry out compulsory biometric fingerprinting of UK domestic passengers. (214442)

The Government are considering using powers in paragraph 26(3) of schedule 2 of the Immigration Act 1971 to require operators of certain airports to verify the identity of travellers through biometrics such as fingerprints before boarding, where there is a mixing of domestic and international passengers in a common departure lounge and where this would be a proportionate measure to manage border security.

The Government continue to work closely with airport operators on the measures required to maintain the security of the UK border and of air travel.

Fraud

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether her Department has prepared a Code of Practice for disclosure of information to prevent fraud under section 71 of the Serious Crimes Act 2007. (236603)

As required by section 71 of the Serious Crime Act 2007, the Home Office prepared a code of practice for public authorities disclosing information to a specified anti-fraud organisation for the purposes of preventing fraud. The code was laid before Parliament on 6 October.

A copy of the code can be found on the Home Office Crime Reduction website:

http://www.crimereduction.homeoffice.gov.uk/organisedcrime/organisedcrime07c.pdf

Human Trafficking

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) arrests and (b) convictions there were for human trafficking offences in each of the last five years. (232793)

A total of 860 people were arrested under the Operations Pentameter 1 and 2.

Since the commencement of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (which came into force on 1 May 2004) to date, there have been 90 convictions for trafficking for sexual exploitation. Details of convictions by year are as follows:

Number of convictions

2004

3

2005

21

2006

32

2007

23

2008

11

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department for how long victims of human trafficking may remain in the UK. (232952)

There is no cap on how long a victim of human trafficking can remain in the UK. The length of stay is determined by the individual circumstances of the victim and is decided on a case by case basis.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many convictions there were for human trafficking for the purpose of (a) forced labour and (b) sexual exploitation in each of the last five years. (232957)

Since the commencement of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (which came into force on 1 May 2004) to date, there have been 90 convictions for trafficking for sexual exploitation. Details of convictions by year are as follows:

Number

2004

3

2005

21

2006

32

2007

23

2008

11

In respect of trafficking for forced labour there have been a total of four convictions to date all of which were secured in 2008.

Human Trafficking: Prostitution

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what steps her Department is taking to raise awareness of sex trafficking; and if she will make a statement. (235657)

We have run a number of awareness campaigns with partners. Our approach focuses on the use of the UK Human Trafficking Centre ‘Blue Blindfold’ awareness campaign, which was launched in January 2008. This campaign has the key message that trafficking is in local communities in the UK and encourages the public to call Crimestoppers with any information. We have also run a targeted campaign aimed at the purchasers of sex about the level and nature of exploitation and trafficking involved in off street prostitution.

All prevention material produced provides details of the bespoke Blue Blindfold website—www.blueblindfold. co.uk, which contains information on indicators of trafficking and dispelling myths about trafficking for sexual exploitation as well as providing contact details for local groups who wish to access the prevention material.

Human Trafficking: Sentencing

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if she will bring forward proposals for a tariff of mandatory minimum sentences for human trafficking offences. (233200)

No.

Sentencing guidelines issued by the Sentencing Guidelines Council provide adequate advice on sentencing for human trafficking cases, including aggravating and mitigating factors that can inform the judicial decision.

Courts are also guided by case law arising from Court of Appeal decisions on sentencing and the Attorney-General has the power to refer cases to the Court of Appeal where it is believed the sentence passed is unduly lenient.

Human Trafficking: Victim Support Schemes

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what progress has been made towards introducing a 45-day minimum recovery period for all victims of trafficking, as set out in the UK Action Plan on Tackling Human Trafficking 2007. (232951)

The ‘Update to the UK Action Plan on Tackling Human Trafficking’, published on 2 July, committed the Government to implement a 45-day reflection and recovery period before 1 April 2009. We are working with partners to finalise formal victim identification arrangements and the training associated with it and are on track to meet this deadline.

Identity Cards

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what proportion of respondents to each of the waves of the National Identity Scheme Tracking Research carried out to date said that they did not support the scheme because they were concerned that (a) it would be an infringement of personal freedom, (b) it would not work, (c) it is a waste of money, (d) personal data will be used without their permission and (e) it could be open to abuse; (227224)

(2) what proportion of respondents to each of the waves of the National Identity Scheme Tracking Research carried out to date said they (a) agreed strongly or slightly and (b) disagreed strongly or slightly with the Government’s plan to introduce the National Identity Scheme;

(3) when the next wave of National Identity Scheme Tracking Research will be carried out; and when she expects the results of this research to be published.

The findings of the National Identity Scheme Tracking Research can be found on the Identity and Passport Service website at:

http://www.ips.gov.uk/identity/publications-research.asp

I would refer the hon. and learned Member to that website.

The next wave of tracking research was being carried out at the end of October, the results of which will be published in December 2008.

Identity Cards: Contracts

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what contracts have yet to be awarded in relation to the identity card scheme; who has tendered for them; and what the value of each contract is expected to be. (224717)

Currently there are three National Identity Scheme procurements being undertaken with the five ‘Strategic Supplier Group’ framework suppliers who were appointed following open procurement in June 2008. For each of these procurements, an initial shortlist process has either happened or is planned and was announced in September. Further to this, a separate procurement is being conducted for replacement of a current passport production contract on expiry. This was advertised in the Official Journal of the EU in June 2008 and a shortlist of bidders from those expressing an interest was announced in September.

For all contracts yet to be awarded, no values have been agreed as they are subject to competitive procurement. However, as part of the procurement process, Identity and Passport Service has shared a current view on costs with bidders. This is to inform discussions while balancing the need to retain competition. Figures are derived from those published in the cost report to Parliament required under the Identity Cards Act 2006 and have recently been amended to reflect updates to bidders as part of the procurement process. They are subject to further refinement and discussion throughout the procurement process, so should be treated as indicative only.

Contract

Capability

Bidders

Value, estimate (£ million)

Application and Enrolment

Replacement of existing contracts as they expire from 2010, for processing of passport applications and supporting IPS infrastructure

CSC

350-450

Development of new capabilities to improve and support future passport applications process

IBM

Development of capabilities to introduce biometric passports and for supporting identity card application processes

Fujitsu

National Biometric Identity Service

Replacement of existing UK Borders Agency biometric database storage and matching capability when contracts expire

IBM

200-250

Development of new biometric matching and storage capabilities for UK Borders Agency

Thales

Development of new biometric capabilities for biometric passports and for identity cards

Card Design and Production

Capabilities to design and securely produce identity cards

CSC

250-350

EDS

Fujitsu

IBM

Thales

Passport Design and Production

Capabilities to design and securely produce passport documents, replacing existing arrangements when they expire in 2010

3M

700

SP and SL

De La

Rue

Gemalto

Thales

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the (a) value is of any penalty and cancellation clauses in the contracts awarded in relation to the identity card scheme and (b) the expected value is in contracts relating to the identity cards scheme that have yet to be awarded. (224720)

Contracts for the NIS using the ‘Strategic Supplier Group’ framework and for passports contain provisions for termination based on Office of Government Commerce guidance. These include terms for ending the contract for poor performance or where a decision is made to terminate early (for ‘convenience’). For termination for convenience where between 12 and 18 months notice is given, a supplier may recover costs incurred to the point of termination and those associated with terminating the contract. Where less notice is given, in addition to costs incurred, some anticipated profit lost as a result of the decision to terminate early may be claimed. As these provisions are based on formulae dependent on when any decision is taken, work incurred to date and what elements of services are being terminated, no ‘value’ can be calculated.

Identity Cards: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what costs have been incurred to date in the planning and implementation of the identity card scheme. (224606)

Between the financial years 2003-04 and 2005-06, £41.1 million was spent by the Home Office Identity Cards Programme in total.

Since the merger of the Home Office Identity Cards Programme and the UK Passport Service to create the Identity and Passport Service on 1 April 2006, projects to deliver passports including facial images and fingerprints, identity cards and other improvements have been necessarily combined. As much of the technology and operational processes needed to implement identity cards is also required for the implementation of these new passports, this is the most cost-effective way to deliver these initiatives.

Much of the work conducted by Identity and Passport Service cannot be categorised, both financially and operationally, as contributing towards either the introduction of passports with facial images and fingerprints or identity cards alone. The work is accounted for as future development projects which in the 2006-07 financial year amounted to £30.9 million. The costs accounted for as future development projects in the 2007-08 financial year were £61.7 million.

The latest six monthly Identity Cards Scheme Cost Report, published on 6 May 2008, sets out those elements of the cost estimates that relate specifically to passports, those specific to identity cards and those that are common to both. The cost of registering individuals for passports and ID cards is included in common costs because the same technology infrastructure and business processes will be used. In many cases, the same application will result in the issue of both a passport and an identity card.

The latest cost report may be found at:

http://www.ips.gov.uk/identity/publications-legislative.asp

I would refer the hon. Member to that report.

Identity Cards: Foreigners

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment she has made of the (a) effectiveness of the technology to be used from 25 November to obtain biometric fingerprints from juvenile foreign nationals over the age of six for the Identity Cards Scheme for Foreign Nationals and (b) merits of obtaining biometric fingerprints from juvenile foreign nationals over the age of six; what advice she has received on the psychological effect of collecting biometric identifiers from juveniles over the age of six; and if she will make a statement. (227984)

The UKBA has many years of experience of taking fingerprints from children aged five and upwards without difficulty. For example, we issued 39,401 application registration cards (ARC) to children aged from five to 16 from 2002 to 2006, and we collected biometric data as part of the visa application process between September 2006 and the end of April 2007 from 5,679 children aged from five to 16.

The benefits of taking children’s fingerprints are wide-ranging from providing a more secure and reliable documentary evidence of a child’s immigration status and identity to helping abate child trafficking, and fraudulent claims for public funds. In addition, it will allow the UK to comply with EU regulation 380/2008 (section 4b) which lays down a uniform format for residence permits for third country nationals.

When evaluating the pilot scheme for the identity cards for foreign nationals, children followed the same quick, easy and clean process that they saw their parent follow and there was no evidence to suggest that children were adversely affected by the process. To date, we have successfully enrolled the biometrics of over 13,000 people.

Immigrants: Vetting

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what access her Department has to the results of Criminal Records Bureau checks carried out in other EU member states; what arrangements are in place to ensure that all EU migrants are subject to a Criminal Records Bureau check before commencing employment in the UK; and if she will make a statement. (234670)

There is no direct equivalent to the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) in other countries or EU member states. Each country operates its own arrangements for providing access to criminal record information and the CRB does not currently access overseas criminal records as part of its Disclosure Service.

The Disclosure Service is only available for those positions and types of work included in the Exceptions Order (1975) to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974. The standard and enhanced disclosure process includes checks against the Police National Computer (PNC) and, if applicable, a search against Section 142 of the Education Act 2002, the Protection of Children Act and Protection of Vulnerable Adults (PoCA and PoVA) lists. Enhanced disclosures also contain a further check conducted by police forces for any relevant non-conviction information. All individuals who have received a successful offer of employment for a role which brings them into contact with children or vulnerable adults are subject to these checks irrespective of an applicant's nationality or length of residence in the United Kingdom.

The CRB introduced an overseas service in February 2003 to provide details and guidance to employers and individuals on how to obtain a certificate of good conduct or a copy of a person’s own criminal record from those countries included in the overseas service.

This information can be used in conjunction with the full range of pre-appointment checks to ensure that the prospective employee is suitable for the post. These pre-appointment checks are the responsibility of the employer and a CRB disclosure is only one part of that process. Full details of this service are available on the CRB website at:

www.crb.gov.uk//overseas.

Some countries also have arrangements enabling their citizens to obtain certificates of good conduct or extracts from any existing criminal record to show to prospective employers. These may be obtained once the prospective employees have arrived in the UK but it may be advisable for them to obtain the document before leaving their home country.

Immigration: Deportation

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the Written Ministerial Statement of 19 May 2008, Official Report, columns 5-6WS, on the UK Border Agency detention estate that an immigration offender is removed from the United Kingdom every eight minutes, how many new arrivals refused entry to the UK at port are counted as removed immigration offenders. (208720)

Of the 63,140 removals from the UK in 2007 (which equates to one removal, on average, every eight minutes), 33,680 were persons refused entry at port and subsequently removed from the UK. The latter figure includes cases dealt with at juxtaposed controls, persons departing voluntarily after enforcement action had been initiated against them and removals which have been performed by Immigration Officers at ports using enforcement powers. Figures are rounded to the nearest five and are provisional.

National Statistics on immigration and asylum are available from the Library of the House and the Home Office’s Research, Development and Statistics website at:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration-asylum-stats.html.

Immobilisation of Vehicles: Licensing

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether her Department's review of the regulation of companies involved in vehicle immobilisation on private land will include consideration of the proposal that the Security Industry Authority take responsibility for the level of fees charged in relation to vehicle immobilisation. (236483)

The Security Industry Authority (SIA) is undertaking a feasibility study of various options for the regulation of vehicle immobilisation companies who work on private land, which is expected to be completed by the end of December. This study is considering options relating to the fees charged in relation to vehicle immobilisation on private land.

Interception Modernisation Programme

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what estimate she has made of the (a) set-up and (b) annual running costs of the Interception Modernisation Programme database. (236501)

The objective of the Interception Modernisation Programme (IMP) is to maintain the UK’s Lawful Intercept and Communications Data capabilities in the changing communications environment. It is a cross-government programme, led by the Home Office, to ensure that our capability to lawfully intercept and exploit data when fighting crime and terrorism is not lost. It was established in response to the Prime Minister’s National Security remit in 2006.

As part of the Government’s Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR 07) a central bid was made to HM Treasury on behalf of the security and intelligence agencies. Funding for IMP was included in this bid.

The IMP will require a substantial level of investment which will need to tie in with the Government’s three-year CSR periods. The scale of overall economic investment is very difficult to calculate because of the complexity of the project and wide ranging implementation solutions currently being considered.

Given the commercial and national security sensitivities, the precise costs of the programme cannot be disclosed. Further detail on budgetary estimates for the IMP will however become available once the public consultation process (announced by the Home Secretary on 15 October) commences in the new year.

Members: Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many and what proportion of replies to hon. Members on immigration cases were signed by a Minister in her Department in the latest period for which figures are available; and what the procedures are for deciding whether the reply is signed by a Minister or the Chief Executive of the UK Border Agency. (213959)

[holding answer 26 June 2008]: In May 2008, 40.5 per cent. of the replies sent to hon. Members, that were originally sent to a Minister, were signed by a Minister.

Letters written directly to the Home Secretary by Cabinet colleagues, Members of the shadow Cabinets and leaders of other political parties will receive a reply direct from the Home Secretary.

Letters written to a Minister that ask for a meeting, are political or explicitly drawing the Minister’s attention to an issue, will also receive a reply from a Minister. Members of the Privy Council will also receive a ministerial reply if they write to a Minister.

The letters that do not fall into these categories are divided between the CEO (and deputy) of the Border Agency and Ministers for replying; with 80 per cent. going to the CEO (and deputy) and 20 per cent. to Ministers.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when she will respond to the letter of 29 September from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mr. Z Mohiny. (235589)

[holding answer 13 November 2008]: I replied to my right hon. Friend’s letter on 13 November 2008.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when she will respond to the letter of 30 September from the right hon. Member for Manchester, Gorton with regard to Mrs. Zara Gulshav. (235590)

[holding answer 13 November 2008]: I replied to my right hon. Friend’s letter on 12 November 2008.

National Policing Improvement Agency: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the budget for the National Policing Improvement Agency will be in (a) 2008-09, (b) 2009-10 and (c) 2010-11. (234744)

[holding answer 10 November 2008]: The National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) budget for resource and capital, as set out in the business plan 2008-11, is given in the following table.

£ million

Resource

Capital

2008-09

396.3

179.0

2009-10

393.8

125.0

2010-11

390.8

119.0

The 2008-09 budget has been delegated by the Home Office. The 2009-10 and 2010-11 budgets have not yet been formally delegated by the Home Office.

Further information can be found in section 8 of the NPIA business plan 2008-11, which is available on the NPIA website at:

http://www.npia.police.uk/en/7403.htm

Neighbourhood Policing Fund

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what the size of the Neighbourhood Policing Fund will be in (a) 2008-09, (b) 2009-10 and (c) 2010-11; (235475)

(2) what the total funding by her Department for police community support officers in England and Wales will be in (a) 2008-09, (b) 2009-10 and (c) 2010-11.

From 1 April 2008, the Neighbourhood Policing Fund has included the grant for police community support officers. The police funding settlement announced on 6 December 2007 set out allocations for 2008-09 and provisionally for 2009-10 and 2010-11. The total figures for England and Wales are (a) £324 million in 2008-09, (b) £332 million in 2009-10 and (c) £341 million in 2010-11.

Parenting Contracts

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many parenting contracts have been issued to parents of young people repeatedly found drinking in public. (234289)

Data on parenting contracts are not collected by the Home Office as they are voluntary agreements and therefore are not suitable for central data collection.

Police Cautions

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) cautions, (b) on-the-spot fines and (c) formal warnings were issued by each police force in each of the last 10 years. (235715)

Information provided by the Ministry of Justice showing the number of offenders cautioned is given in table 1. The number of penalty notices for disorder (on-the-spot fines) issued from 2004 (commencement of the scheme) to 2006 is given in table 2. Data for 2007 in relation to both cautions and penalty notices for disorder are due to be published at the end of November 2008.

Police forces can also issue ‘on the spot fines’ or fixed penalty notices (FPNs) for various motoring offences. Information on the number of FPNs issued, broken down by police force area for the years 1997 to 2007 are published in table 20(a) of the Home Office publication ‘Offences Relating to Motor Vehicles’. Copies are available in the House Library.

The only formal warning statistics that are collected centrally are cannabis warnings. Police forces have been able to issue a formal warning for possession of cannabis, known as a cannabis warning, since 1 April 2004. The available data are given in table 3. Figures for 2004-05 cannot be shown at the police force area level. For this period, there were an estimated 39,256 cannabis warnings in England and Wales.

Table 1: Number of offenders cautioned1, by police force area, England and Wales 1997 to 20062,3

Police force area

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Avon and Somerset

3,773

4,534

5,197

4,764

4,351

4,286

4,615

5,075

6,107

8,332

Bedfordshire

2,940

2,789

2,833

2,265

3,112

2,628

2,827

3,080

3,455

3,539

Cambridgeshire

2,477

2,621

2,569

2,308

2,207

2.114

2,063

2,618

3,985

4,233

Cheshire

4,048

4,587

3,592

3,111

2,780

2,085

3,051

3,268

4,572

5,318

City of London

1,146

751

709

559

902

1,083

974

605

807

850

Cleveland

7,242

5,583

4,321

3,267

3,087

3,020

3,256

3,490

3,617

5,672

Cumbria

2,902

3,015

3,032

2,337

2,505

2,392

2,615

2,753

2,652

2,956

Derbyshire

3,832

3,532

3,301

2,917

3,161

2,732

2,794

3,371

4,644

4,874

Devon and Cornwall

8,042

7,047

7,226

7,283

7,177

7,224

7,870

6,951

7,175

8,905

Dorset

964

1,741

1,787

1,926

1,787

1,709

1,789

3,114

3,115

4,024

Durham

2,014

2,089

2,393

2,349

2,424

2,681

2,628

2,160

3,137

4,330

Essex

6,717

6,064

5,296

4,690

4,640

4,330

4,277

4,799

7,530

11,763

Gloucestershire

2,331

2,897

2,754

2,848

2,828

2,815

2,590

2,696

3,822

3,553

Greater Manchester

16,297

19,716

16,142

12,389

11,181

9,774

11,063

12,778

13,184

13,820

Hampshire

7,592

6,424

7,478

7,014

7,436

6,765

7,587

8,747

9,180

8,962

Hertfordshire

3,057

2,867

2,779

3,182

3,237

3,096

3,378

3,826

4,006

6,379

Humberside

3,968

4,509

3,756

3,533

3,250

2,632

2,874

4,118

5,386

5,863

Kent

7,129

8,570

8,533

7,655

7,339

6,479

8,252

10,013

10,166

11,541

Lancashire

9,333

8,909

7,355

6,777

7,189

6,515

8,205

10,229

10,345

13,212

Leicestershire

3,155

3,409

3,202

2,512

2,149

804

2,564

3,898

5,029

6,045

Lincolnshire

2,566

2,425

1,957

1,440

1,799

2,101

2,063

2,177

3,672

4,264

Merseyside

13,763

14,205

12,159

8,216

6,142

6,331

6,165

6,388

3,785

4,030

Metropolitan Police

53,632

57,969

46,239

36,758

31,337

32,088

31,324

31,833

35,152

43,844

Norfolk

4,460

3,345

2,809

2,773

2,302

2,345

2,314

2,774

3,013

4,471

North Yorkshire

1,852

2,238

2,531

2,461

2,590

2,646

2,722

2,740

2,405

2,337

Northamptonshire

2,352

3,176

3,021

3,431

3,679

3,560

2,716

2,591

3,237

4,714

Northumbria

17,586

14,620

14,505

14,165

14,065

15,694

16,779

16,246

16,628

16,389

Nottinghamshire

5,966

5,808

5,323

5,142

5,118

3,862

4,814

4,868

7,640

9,872

South Yorkshire

4,965

5,306

6,217

3,950

4,304

4,102

4,839

4,891

9,506

12,344

Staffordshire

5,905

4,958

4,105

5,628

5,455

6,124

5,585

4,616

6,496

8,098

Suffolk

3,188

3,345

2,695

3,201

3,459

3,336

3,636

3,484

3,670

4,093

Surrey

2,861

3,514

3,914

3,213

4,097

3,675

4,793

5,435

5,654

5,265

Sussex

6,640

5,762

6,393

6,670

7,666

8,151

8,162

8,709

9,146

9,327

Thames Valley

3,705

3,209

4,626

6,790

5,157

6,149

6,534

8,243

13,337

13,410

Warwickshire

2,160

2,143

2,061

1,785

2,161

2,024

2,277

1,936

2,920

3,610

West Mercia

5,866

5,836

5,297

5,380

6,385

6,357

6,251

6,658

7,747

8,110

West Midlands

15,836

17,093

17,138

15,575

14,517

15,078

15,143

13,751

17,706

20,774

West Yorkshire

8,875

9,676

9,923

9,633

9,071

10,073

11,277

14,959

17,904

20,314

Wiltshire

2,575

2,497

2,678

2,853

2,115

1,695

2,347

1,985

2,046

2,081

England

263,712

268,779

247,846

222,750

214,161

210,555

225,013

241,873

283,578

331,518

Dyfed-Powys

3,109

3,452

3,313

3,185

3,495

3,761

4,491

3,170

3,973

5,179

Gwent

5,329

5,780

5,502

4,529

4,258

3,803

3,666

1,456

2,553

5,649

North Wales

3,074

3,544

3,619

3,124

3,120

3,559

3,299

3,237

2,706

2,842

South Wales

6,869

6,339

5,852

5,399

4,826

3,680

5,337

6,032

6,135

4,789

Wales

18,381

19,115

18,286

16,237

15,699

14,803

16,793

13,895

15,367

18,459

Total England and Wales

282,093

287,894

266,132

238,987

229,860

225,358

241,806

255,768

298,945

349,977

1 From 1 June 2000 the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 came into force nationally and removed the use of cautions for persons under 18 and replaced them with reprimands and final warnings. These figures have been included in the totals.

2 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

3 The cautions statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been cautioned for two or more offences at the same time the principal offence is the more serious offence.

Table 2: Number of penalty notices for disorder issued to recipients of all ages, by police force area, all offences, England and Wales 2004 to 20061

Police force area

20042

2005

2006

Avon and Somerset

508

3,244

3,951

Bedfordshire

503

1,239

1,645

British Transport police

n/a

n/a

3,058

Cambridgeshire

359

1,046

1,518

Cheshire

972

2,387

2,283

City of London

60

219

316

Cleveland

559

2,806

3,570

Cumbria

578

1,220

1,693

Derbyshire

656

1,593

2,583

Devon and Cornwall

1,889

5,134

7,022

Dorset

516

1,381

2,309

Durham

597

1,149

1,591

Essex

2,802

4,454

4,461

Gloucestershire

473

1,721

3,164

Greater Manchester

2,253

7,256

10,881

Hampshire

2,116

3,658

4,909

Hertfordshire

412

1,296

5,615

Humberside

1,596

3,265

5,490

Kent

767

5,032

7,080

Lancashire

5,077

10,222

12,479

Leicestershire

756

1,909

2,426

Lincolnshire

544

2,373

2,049

Merseyside

3,929

11,937

11,709

Metropolitan

12,758

18,047

20,856

Norfolk

475

676

1,332

North Yorkshire

1,078

1,596

2,395

Northamptonshire

570

1,403

2,541

Northumbria

211

2,147

6,418

Nottinghamshire

1,060

2,119

2,304

South Yorkshire

2,098

3,710

6,185

Staffordshire

1,450

2,169

3,261

Suffolk

472

901

1,472

Surrey

203

641

2,844

Sussex

1,509

4,193

5,268

Thames Valley

1,038

5,795

6,789

Warwickshire

481

933

1,049

West Mercia

275

1,774

3,533

West Midlands

4,773

7,320

8,015

West Yorkshire

4,277

9,217

8,930

Wiltshire

610

1,080

1,246

England

61,260

138,262

186,240

Dyfed Powys

459

1,214

1,393

Gwent

424

1,511

2,050

North Wales

1,255

3,792

6,167

South Wales

241

1,702

5,347

Wales

2,379

8,219

14,957

England and Wales

63,639

146,481

201,197

n/a = Not applicable. The British Transport police started issuing PNDs on 1 March 2006.

1 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

2 First year of PND scheme. Fully rolled out to all forces on 1 April 2004.

Table 3: Number of cannabis warnings issued by police force area and year 2005-06 to 2007-081,2

Police force area

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

Avon and Somerset

2,578

3,600

2,554

Bedfordshire

643

324

289

British Transport police

203

430

1,707

Cambridgeshire

492

956

1,594

Cheshire

393

532

757

City of London

682

373

436

Cleveland

392

331

686

Cumbria

219

231

218

Derbyshire

513

497

520

Devon and Cornwall

1,532

1,473

1,380

Dorset

340

348

393

Durham

207

257

256

Essex

697

722

1,348

Gloucestershire

395

419

459

Greater Manchester

3,235

4,943

5,311

Hampshire

1,113

1,477

2,260

Hertfordshire

488

1,394

1,485

Humberside

149

533

895

Kent

497

652

846

Lancashire

237

210

528

Leicestershire

978

1,555

1,967

Lincolnshire

471

543

508

Merseyside

8,561

7,204

7,229

Metropolitan

21,040

30,554

46,986

Norfolk

638

731

786

North Yorkshire

654

554

702

Northamptonshire

111

206

311

Northumbria

155

1,419

1,311

Nottinghamshire

855

1,077

1,210

South Yorkshire

1,023

1,027

1,296

Staffordshire

1,323

1,282

1,150

Suffolk

64

573

599

Surrey

482

754

993

Sussex

1,350

1,971

2,447

Thames Valley

1,883

2,431

2,753

Warwickshire

419

650

399

West Mercia

582

686

756

West Midlands

3,451

2,852

2,286

West Yorkshire

1,839

1,539

1,340

Wiltshire

394

231

218

England

61,278

77,541

99,169

Dyfed Powys

799

887

882

Gwent

396

646

757

North Wales

793

971

985

South Wales

536

1,266

2,414

Wales

2,524

3,770

5,038

England and Wales

63,802

81,311

104,207

1 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

2 Cannabis warnings cannot be shown at the police force area level for 2004-05. In this period, there were an estimated 39,256 cannabis warnings issued in England and Wales.

Police: Disciplinary Proceedings

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many police disciplinary proceedings following internal investigations took place in each year since 2001. (234736)

This information is no longer collected by the Home Office. The collation and publication of the statistics requested has been the responsibility of the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) since 1 April 2004, in accordance with the Police Reform Act 2002.

The Home Office data are set out in the following table.

Most severe misconduct sanction imposed on each officer by category

Misconduct Sanction

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

Dismissal

41

24

44

33

Requested to resign

84

73

71

62

Reduction in rank

15

19

18

14

Reduction in pay (disciplinary punishment)

7

3

Fine

154

191

169

138

Reprimand

86

88

58

42

Caution

51

50

42

21

Substantiated - no further action

4

8

7

14

Total

442

456

409

324

Police: Manpower

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many serving police officers there were in (a) North Yorkshire, (b) York, (c) Hambledon district and (d) Ryedale district in each of the last five years; and if she will make a statement. (236307)

The available data for North Yorkshire police and all of its Basic Command Units (BCUs) are given in the following table. Police personnel statistics are not collected by district.

Police officer strength by Basic Command Unit as at 31 March in each of the given years1

North Yorkshire BCUs

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

North Yorkshire Central

422

410

438

426

402

North Yorkshire Eastern

430

399

430

424

398

North Yorkshire Western

412

404

430

433

421

Central Services

269

347

356

387

361

North Yorkshire Police Force Total

1,534

1,560

1,653

1,670

1,581

1 These figures are based on full-time equivalents that have been rounded to the nearest whole number, due to rounding there may be an apparent discrepancy between totals and the sums of constituent items. Figures include those officers on career breaks.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many police officers per 100,000 population there were in North Yorkshire in each year since 1997; (237111)

(2) how many police officers there were in (a) North Yorkshire and (b) Yorkshire in each year since 1997.

The available data are given in the following tables.

Table 1: Police officer strength1 (FTE)2 by police force as at 31 March 1997 to 31 March 2008

As at 31 March:

Police force

19973

1998

1999

2000

20013

2002

20033

20043

20053

20063

20073

20083

North Yorkshire

1,338

1,367

1,337

1,283

1,305

1,417

1,444

1,529

1,543

1,636

1,654

1,560

South Yorkshire

3,159

3,182

3,168

3,163

3,197

3,199

3,183

3,279

3,265

3,255

3,254

3,172

West Yorkshire

5,209

5,155

4,982

4,822

4,815

4,889

5,029

5,275

5,631

5,644

5,655

5,744

Yorkshire (combined)

9,705

9,704

9,487

9,268

9,317

9,505

9,656

10,083

10,439

10,535

10,563

10,475

Table 2: Police officers1 (FTE)2 per 100,000 of the population for by police force, as at 31 March 1997 to 31 March 2008

As at 31 March:

Police force

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

20043

20053

20063

20073

20083

North Yorkshire

183

186

181

173

175

188

193

203

206

216

217

202

1 This table contains full-time equivalent figures that have been rounded to the nearest whole number. Because of rounding, there may be an apparent discrepancy between totals and the sums of the constituent items.

2 Full-time equivalent excludes those on career breaks or maternity/paternity leave.

3 Comparable strength (excludes those on career breaks, or maternity/paternity leave). The Police Numbers Task Force (2001) recommended that a clear presentation was made of the numbers of staff employed by police forces including those seconded into the force and those on any type of long or short term absence. These new calculations were first used in 2003, and are not comparable with data prior to March 2003. The data from 2003 onwards used here are termed comparable because they have been calculated on the old basis to allow comparison.

Police: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what training police officers are required to undertake on the issues of (a) domestic violence, (b) female genital mutilation, (c) forced marriage, (d) rape, (e) stalking, (f) human trafficking and (g) honour-based violence. (236458)

The National Police Improvement Agency (NPIA) has developed modules for training domestic abuse which are used by the police service. All new recruits and civilian staff receive this which equates to two days training and incorporates child protection training.

The modules are being currently being refreshed by the NPIA to incorporate female genital mutilation (FGM), stalking and harassment and “honour”-based violence (HBV).

Some police forces have produced stand-alone training, for example, the Metropolitan Police Service Project Azore, which relates to specialist staff receiving training on FGM and Thames Valley police, South Wales and the North Eastern regional police forces who have produced training around HBV, FGM and trafficking for frontline staff, senior investigating officers (SIO), call handlers, and specialists. This training has been forwarded to the NPIA product design for assessment with a view to informing the national training.

The specially trained officer development programme (STODP) was developed by the NPIA to develop the skills and competence of officers dealing with rape victims.

The role profile and the programme itself was developed through wide consultation with practitioners in the police service and representatives from the following:

Home Office

Crown Prosecution Service

Health Service

Voluntary Sector

Skills for Justice

The programme consists of three stages:

1. A knowledge acquisition stage—consisting of distance learning workbooks

2. A skills development stage—consisting of a two week course.

3. A workplace learning and assessment stage—through a professional development portfolio.

This programme was delivered to the police service through a number of regional roadshows conducted in November 2007.

Privacy

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans she has to carry out a privacy impact assessment on the provisions of the Communications Data Bill; and if she will make a statement. (231779)

On 15 October, I announced that we would be launching a consultation on how to maintain the ability of police and intelligence agencies to protect the public using communications data, in the face of the challenge of changing technology. This consultation will begin in the new year.

I am clear that we need to consult widely with the public and all interested parties to set out the emerging problem, the important capability gaps that we need to address and to look at the possible solutions.

Protection: Religious Freedom

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many individuals who have converted from Islam to other faiths have been placed on an at risk register by police forces in England and Wales following threats made to them as a result of their conversion. (173947)

Security Guards: Licensing

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many Security Industry Authority licence holders have had their licences revoked incorrectly following inaccurate information being provided by her Department on their right to work. (232343)

The Security Industry Authority’s revocation process, which applied following right to work checks with the United Kingdom Border Agency on non-EEA SIA licence holders, incorporates a number of safeguards to ensure that licences are not revoked incorrectly. This includes written notification to the holder informing them that the SIA is minded to revoke their licence and allowing 21 days to respond with evidence of their right to work, during which the licence remains in force. Revocation follows if no such evidence is provided, but the holder retains the right of appeal through the courts for a further 21 days and a licence remains in force until the appeal process is completed.

There have been instances where licence holders have not responded to requests for information from the SIA, had their licences revoked and subsequently demonstrated a valid right to work at appeal. The latest information available shows that there have been just over 250 such cases since 1 January 2008, or 3 per cent. of the approximately 8,100 cases where revocation ensued after a warning letter had been sent following the right to work checks on almost 40,000 non-EEA licence holders at the end of 2007.

Sex Establishments

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans she has to reclassify lap-dancing clubs as sex encounter establishments. (235650)

Terrorism

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what use has been made of the powers to search domestic hereditaments for weapons of mass destruction under section 52 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001. (222694)

Written Questions: Government Responses

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when she plans to answer question 195404 on routes to citizenship, tabled on 18 March. (206477)

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when she plans to answer question 195037, on security passes, tabled on 13 March 2008. (206493)

Culture, Media and Sport

BBC: Standards

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if he will place in the Library a copy of the most recent report on the inspection of the British Broadcasting Corporation by the Office of the Surveillance Commissioner. (236617)

The report is a matter for the BBC.

It is the view of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner that for public authorities to disclose the contents of his reports would prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs and the BBC does not therefore propose to place a copy of this report in the Library of the House.

Bed and Breakfast Accommodation

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what recent representations he has received from representatives of people running bed and breakfast establishments. (233565)

[holding answer 6 November 2008]: My predecessor, my right hon. Friend the Member for Barking (Margaret Hodge) met my hon. Friend the Member for Gloucester (Mr. Dhanda) the former Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) on 21 July 2008 to discuss concerns raised by VisitBritain, on behalf of small accommodation providers about the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 and its impact on their establishments.

DCLG is working with stakeholders on providing guidance to accommodation providers which will help them understand what is required of them and give them practical advice. The industry, VisitBritain and my Department continue to work with DCLG on addressing this issue.

Churches: Theft

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what support English Heritage has given to churches on tackling increases in thefts of lead from church roofs. (236514)

English Heritage is extremely concerned about the theft of metals from churches. A substantial proportion of its grant aid over many years has been given to re-roof parish churches, usually in lead which is the most robust and appropriate material. English Heritage has recently published a guidance note on its website

http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/upload/pdf/Advice_Note_on_Theft_of_Metal_Roof_Coverings_5_JS_.pdf

which provides information and advice on ways to minimise the threat of theft and suggests sensible precautions that congregations can take.

English Heritage scrutinises new methods of preventing theft when it is asked to do so. This work is undertaken by its national security adviser who tests for example, new devices and systems. English Heritage then disseminates findings on effective systems to all interested parties.

Community Development: Crosby

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what recent assessment he has made of (a) the effectiveness of community sport and cultural activities funded by his Department in engaging young people most at risk of committing antisocial behaviour and (b) the effectiveness of community sport and cultural activities funded in Crosby constituency in meeting their objectives. (236716)

Through our agencies we have a wide range of programmes that offer young people most at risk of committing antisocial behaviour the opportunity to participate more in sport and culture. These include the Kickz Programme, and the Department's Youth Mentoring Programme for media, music and sport which includes 'Your Hired!' and the 'Respect Athlete Mentoring Programme'.

We have not undertaken a specific assessment of the effectiveness of such programmes in respect of engaging young people most at risk of committing antisocial behaviour, or the effectiveness of community sport and cultural activities in Crosby in particular.

Cultural Heritage

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many staff in his Department were employed to work on heritage issues in each year since 1997. (227202)

Such headcount information as is available is shown in the following table.

Headcount

2003-04

37

2004-05

38

2005-06

37

2006-07

36

2007-08

30

These figures represent the position at the end of each financial year.

Departmental Consultants

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many external consultants work for his Department. (232843)

From 1 April 2008 to date 10 external consultants have worked for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

Departmental Data Protection

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what procedures are in place in his Department to ensure that data are not lost; and what steps his Department takes to ensure that companies contracted to provide services for his Department take steps to prevent such losses. (237034)

My Department protects its information by complying with government security standards which are a mix of physical and logical controls.

Staff have been reminded of their responsibility to protect and secure information and to not copy sensitive data to removable media unless it is absolutely necessary. If they do they have been reminded that it should be safeguarded as if it was a large amount of cash.

Laptop hard drives are encrypted and only encrypted data sticks may carry departmental information.

My Department uses the standard terms and conditions provided by the OGC in its contracts. It also includes the specific mandatory requirements set out in the Cabinet Office review of data handling in its invitation to tender documentation. Compliance with all security requirements is a compulsory element of tender evaluation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport whether the data shared between his Department and companies contracted to provide services for it is routinely encrypted. (237169)

My Department does not hold large amounts of sensitive data that need to be shared with suppliers. Payroll information is shared with a supplier and passes across a secure Government Secure Intranet and is not encrypted.

Departmental Land

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how much surplus land (a) his Department and (b) its agencies own; and what the (i) area and (ii) estimated monetary value of each site is. (236431)

Neither the Department for Culture, Media and Sport nor its agency The Royal Parks, own any surplus land.

Departmental Written Questions

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many Questions for written answer were tabled to his Department in Session (a) 2002-03, (b) 2003-04, (c) 2004-05, (d) 2005-06, (e) 2006-07 and (f) 2007-08 to date; and how many were (i) answered substantively and (ii) not answered on grounds of disproportionate cost. (235397)

The number of written questions tabled (and transferred) to DCMS is as follows

Number

2002-03

1,492

2003-04

1,389

2004-05

6,73

2005-06

3,080

2006-07

12,147

2007-08

12,375

1 Excludes figures for written questions answered by the Minister for the Olympics. Information obtained from the DCMS parliamentary questions database.

Information on how many written questions were answered substantively and not answered on grounds of disproportionate cost is not readily available and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. However all DCMS answers are a matter of public record and can be found in the Official Report.

Gambling Commission: Standards

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if he will place in the Library a copy of the report on the inspection of the Gambling Commission by the Office of the Surveillance Commissioner. (236614)

The report is a matter for the Gambling Commission and the Commission considers that it is not in the public interest to make the document available in the public domain at this time.

In the Commission's view, disclosing the scale and nature of the Commission's processes would, or would be likely to, compromise the Commission's ability to perform its statutory functions, which include investigating the commission of offences.

Government Art Collection

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport pursuant to the answer of 10 November 2008, Official Report, column 817W, on the Government Art Collection, what the eight missing works of art are; when each was recorded as missing; what the monetary value of each is estimated to be; and how much has been spent to date on their recovery. (235993)

The information is as follows:

Horse Guards from the Old Entrance, Scotland Yard

Print after Michael Angelo Rooker

(GAC15039)

Recorded as missing on 1 November 2007

Estimated value: £400

Monument to Balance 4/30

Print by Ernest DUNN

(GACL90)

Recorded as missing on 28 July 2008

Estimated value: £120

The Wording of Police Charges 37/150 1970

Plague 37/150 1970

(GAC12775)

(GAC12754)

Prints by R.B. KITAJ

Recorded as missing on 30 July 2008

Estimated value: £500 each

Yellow Square plus Quarter Blue 30/72 1972

Print by William SCOTT

(GAC11397)

Recorded as missing on 2 September 2008

Estimated value: £4,000

Mudbanks A/P 1978

Print by Julian Trevelyan

(GAC15018)

Recorded as missing on 2 September 2008

Estimated value: £500

Calypso 36/50

Print by Julian TREVELYAN

(GACL608)

Recorded as missing on 2 September 2008

Estimated value: £500

Breeze I 40/50 1967

Print by John Brunsdon

(GACL908)

Recorded as missing on 2 September 2008

Estimated value: £100

The only money spent on the recovery of these items has been in terms of staff time. There are more than 13,500 works of art in the Government Art Collection's holdings. At any one time approximately 70 per cent. of these are on display in over 400 different buildings in the UK and around the world and their location recorded on the GAC database. In addition to this central record the GAC undertakes audits of its holdings remotely and in person and these occasionally show that works are not in their previously recorded locations. However, after extensive searches many of these subsequently turn up. The answer provided on 10 November 2008, that eight works of art are currently registered as missing for the period 1 November 2007 to 31 October 2008, therefore represents the situation as it is at this particular moment.

These eight works of art are not original works but multiples.

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport pursuant to the answer of 10 November 2008, Official Report, column 817W, on the Government Art Collection, for what reason his Department's website lists only two works of art as missing; and when the relevant page of the website was last updated. (235994)

The two works of art listed on the DCMS's website were original works of art and were known to have been stolen from a particular building in February 2008. The circumstances were advertised on the DCMS website and the police were informed. They have since been recovered by the police and the relevant page was updated 13 November.

Historic Buildings: Consultants

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how much has been spent on consultancy fees in respect of (a) Old Sarum Castle and (b) Wardour Castle by (i) his Department and (ii) English Heritage in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. (235966)

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has not spent anything on consultancy fees in respect of Old Sarum Castle and Wardour Castle in each of the last five years.

English Heritage state that they have spent the following amounts on consultancy fees in respect of each of the properties in the same period:

£

Old Sarum Castle

Wardour Castle

2003-04

0

0

2004-05

921

0

2005-06

0

0

2006-07

0

0

2007-08

20,143

0

Historic Buildings: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how much (a) income has been received and (b) expenditure has been incurred by English Heritage in respect of (i) Old Sarum Castle and (ii) Wardour Castle since 1996. (235967)

English Heritage state that they have received the following income and incurred the following costs from Old Sarum Castle and Wardour Castle since 1996-97.

£

Earned income

Expenditure

Old Sarum Castle

2,719,216

2,828,108

Wardour Castle

798,341

1,096,938

Licensing Laws

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if he will bring forward proposals to extend the grounds on which the police can object to the issue of a temporary events notice (TEN) to include (a) the prevention of public nuisance and (b) the protection of children from harm; and if he will establish a mechanism for public objections in the application process for TENs. (236940)

The Government have no plans to extend police powers of objection to temporary event notices (TENs), nor do they plan to extend the right of objection to local residents. The system for temporary permitted activities (TENs) is a light touch system involving minimum bureaucracy. Such a light touch system is possible because of the limitations directly imposed on the use of the system by the Licensing Act 2003.

Only the police can object to the giving of a TEN, on the grounds of crime and disorder. However, there are also powers for the police or environmental health officers to close events where there is excessive noise nuisance. The giving of a TEN does not overrule existing environmental health, planning and health and safety law, all of which must be complied with for a temporary event to occur legally.

Of course, if there were evidence that problems were frequently occurring at events authorised by a TEN then we could look at the legislation again. However, despite there being an estimated 119,000 TENs given in 2007-08, I am not aware of such evidence.

Lotteries: Housing

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what advice the Gambling Commission has (a) given and (b) retracted on the legality of house sale competitions. (236616)

The Gambling Commission has advised that it does not have regulatory responsibilities in respect of prize competitions and free draws but that they do monitor the boundary between them and Lotteries. The Gambling Commission has published a range of guidance documents on the implementation of the Gambling Act 2005, including Guidance on Prize Competitions and Free Draws, published in November 2007. A press release urging homeowners to be aware of the rules on ‘house competitions’ was published in October 2008. The press release advised that individuals considering or operating a scheme to sell their house using prize competitions should consider the guidance on the Gambling Commission website and take independent legal advice before proceeding.

The Commission advised that in September 2008 they corrected advice given in response to an e-mail inquiry from a member of the public relating to house competitions, but that no other advice or guidance which has been published on the website or given in any other form has been subsequently corrected or retracted.

Public Houses

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what net change in the number has been made of the net change in the number of public houses over the last year. (236615)

We have made no assessment of the net change in the number of public houses over the last year. The DCMS Statistical Bulletin on Alcohol, Entertainment and Late Night Refreshment does not identify the number of pubs in England and Wales; but rather the number of premises authorising the sale or supply of alcohol by means of a premises licence or a club premises certificate. These figures apply not only to public houses, but also to other licensed premises such as hotels, off licences and convenience stores.

Regeneration: Coastal Areas

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what funds have been made available for regeneration of seaside towns in the last three years; and how much has been given to each area. (236997)

[holding answer 18 November 2008]: My Department’s contribution to the Government’s work in support of the regeneration of seaside towns is through the £45 million (£15 million pa over the next three years) Sea Change Programme. This has only been in place since 1 April 2008, but £14.6 million has been made available for regeneration of seaside towns through this initiative since then. The funding allocated to each area is set out in the following table:

Seaside town/resort

Grant awarded (£)

Blackpool

4,000,000

Dover

3,850,000

Torbay

2,247,532

Berwick

1,000,000

Bexhill-on-Sea

1,000,000

Littlehampton

480,800

Teignmouth

376,676

Boscombe

455,000

Weston-Super-Mare

951,447

Westward Ho!

1100,000

North Tyneside

229,525

Fleetwood

230,000

Margate

230,000

Illfracombe

230,000

Withernsea

230,000

1 Development grant.

2 Feasibility grant.

Swimming: Elderly

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many representations his Department has received from local authorities on the financial effects of proposals for free swimming for over-60s. (236180)

We are collating final responses but have received to date approximately 30 representations from local authorities on the financial effects of proposals for free swimming for over-60s.

Tourism: Departmental Coordination

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport when he last chaired a meeting with the Ministers from the Department for Communities and Local Government, Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform and the Home Office to discuss UK tourism-related issues. (236234)

[holding answer 17 November 2008]: The Secretary of State and I regularly raise tourism-related issues in the course of discussions with colleagues across Government.

My predecessor, the right hon. Member for Barking (Margaret Hodge) met with the right hon. Member for Birmingham Hodge Hill (Mr. Byrne) the former Minister of State at the Home Office in April to discuss visas. She also met with the hon. Member for Gloucester (Mr. Dhanda) the former Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Department for Communities and Local Government on 21 July 2008 to discuss concerns raised by VisitBritain, on behalf of small accommodation providers about The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 and its impact on their establishments.

I will shortly be meeting with the right hon. Member for Oldham East and Sadleworth (Mr. Woolas), Minister of State at the Home Office and HM Treasury to continue the discussions on visas and also with the right hon. Member for Wolverhampton, South-East (Mr. McFadden), Minister for State at the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform to discuss Daylight Saving.

Leader of the House

Racial Harassment

To ask the Leader of the House how many complaints of racial abuse relating to staff for which her Office is responsible have been (a) investigated and (b) upheld in the last 12 months. (236901)

The Leader's Office has a policy of zero tolerance to all forms of abuse. There have been no complaints of racial abuse within the last 12 months.